whereas their fathers being a great way from the fulfilling of the promises and having not such manifest revelations and signes as they now had by the Ministerie of Moses yet were more firme in faith than that present incredulous age Simler So shall it bee a just rebuke unto us that live now in the cleere light of the Gospell if wee be lesse zealous of Gods glorie than they which have lived before us in the time of ignorance Therefore let us give eare unto the Apostle The night is past and the day is at hand let us therefore cast away the works of darknesse and put on the armour of light Rom. 13.12 2. Observ. Affliction at the first is grievous but in the end comfortable Vers. 9. BVt they hearkened not unto Moses for anguish of spâ—rit Such is the condition and qualitie of affliction that it maketh the heart heavie and so disquieteth the soule that it can not raise up it selfe to lay hold on any spirituall comfort Simler as the Apostle saith No chastising for the present seemeth to be joyous but grievous but afterward it bringeth the quiet fruit of righteousnesse to them that are thereby exercised Heb. 12.11 Here the Apostle sheweth two divers effects of affliction one which proceedeth of our naturall infirmitie to worke sorrow and griefe the other wrought by grace in those that make good use of their chastisement it bringeth in the end peace and comfort 3. Observ. God raiseth honourable instruments from meane places Vers. 16. THese are the names of the sonnes of Levi This tribe by reason of Iacobs curse laid upon it was in disgrace and contempt yet God out of the same raised these honourable instruments Moses and Aaron So God many times raiseth his servants out of the dust as Mary was a poore despised handmaid in Israel yet chosen to be the mother of Christ the Apostles were taken some from base trades other from ignominious offices as Matthew that was a Publican 4. Observ. God giveth his gifts diversly Vers. 30. I Am of uncircumcised lips Moses had not the gift of eloquence but he had a most plentifull gift of heavenly wisdome and understanding thus God distributeth his gifts diversly Pellican Aaron had the gift of eloquence but was in heavenly knowledge and illumination inferiour to Moses So the Apostle saith To one is given by the spirit the word of wisdome and to another the word of knowledge and to another diversities of tongues 1 Cor. 12.9.10 Every one hath not all gifts that one may stand in need of another CHAP. VII 1. The Method and Argument MOses appeareth the second and third time before Pharaoh delivering the Lords message unto Pharaoh for the dismissing of his people and upon his refusall sheweth signes and calleth for the first plague of the turning of the waters into bloud There are three parts of the whole Chapter The first containeth the renewing of the charge and commandement of God to Moses to goe unto Pharaoh to verse 8. wherein these things are declared 1. The authoritie which the Lord giveth to Moses over Pharaoh vers 1. 2. His commission what he shall speake vers 2. 3. The event Pharaohs refusall 4. The end that God may worke his great judgements in Egypt vers 4. 5. Moses and Aarons obedience with a description of their yeeres and age vers 6.7 The second expresseth the generall signe which serveth for the confirmation of Moses calling by turning his rod into a Serpent from vers 8. to vers 14. wherein three things are further shewed first the commandement of God to Moses vers 8. Secondly the execution by Moses vers 9. Thirdly the event the hardnesse of Pharaohs heart vers 13. with the occasion thereof the Magicians counterfeit miracle in doing the like The third part describeth the first plague laid upon Egypt 1. The denuntiation thereof by the Lord containing the message to Pharaoh vers 15.16 The matter or subject of the first plague the water and fish therein the one shall bee turned into bloud the other shall die vers 17. with the generall instrument Aarons rod vers 19. 2. Then followeth the execution by Moses vers 20. 3. Then the events follow first the fish die the water stinketh vers 21. Secondly Pharaohs heart is hardened by reason of the like practice by the Egyptian Sorcerers vers 22 23. Thirdly the endevour of the Egyptians in digging pits for water 2. The divers readings Vers. 1. Aaron thy brother shall be thy Prophet B.G.A.P. cum caeter shall be thine interpreter I. the sense but not the words Nebi signifieth a Prophet Vers. 4. Pharaoh shall not hearken unto you that I may lay my hand B. G. and I will lay my hand L. V. A. P. S. H. rather when I have laid my hand I. Pharaohs hardnesse of heart is set forth as the cause rather why the Lord would send his judgements than an effect as the former verse sheweth and chap. 3.19 So Moses and Aaron did as Iehovah commanded them so did they I. A. P. better than Moses and Aaron did as the Lord commanded them even so did they B. G. cum caeter for the perfect distinction athâ—ah comming betweene divideth the first part of the sentence Vers. 9. Shall be turned into a Dragon I. A. P. S. rather than a Serpent B.G.V.L. Tanmin signifieth a Dragon yet he meaneth a Serpent called a Dragon because of the fearfulnesse and greatnesse of it as Moses fled from it chap. 4.3 Vers. 18. The Egyptians shall be grieved to drinke that is loath B.G. shall be troubled in drinking L. shall be wearied in drinking I.V. shall not be able to drinke S. shall labour A.P. so Iaah signifieth and it is sometime taken for to grieve or loath as Iob 4.2 Of the water of the river B.G. cum caeter of every river I. but in the originall there is no pronoune but an article onely set before yet the same effect followed also in other rivers and waters Vers. 19. Stretch out thine hand against the water as it is taken vers 5. I will stretch forth H. mine hand rather upon the waters V. L. cum caeter as chap. 8. 5. Stretch forth thine hand to worke on the waters I. to worke is inserted Vers. 23. He did not set his heart upon this I.L.S.A.P.B. did not consider this in his heart V. this yet did not enter into his heart G. 3. The explanation of difficult questions QUEST I. Of the divers appellations of the name of God Vers. 1. I Have made thee Pharaohs God This name and title of God is used and applied foure wayes in Scripture 1. essentially and so it is given onely unto the blessed Trinitie and is not communicable unto any creature 2. personally and so it agreeth onely unto Christ as man 3. according to the vaine opinion and estimation of men so the Idols of the Gentiles are caelled gods as 1 Cor. 8.5 Though there be that are
imposition of a new name the testimony of the Prophet Hosee He had power over the Angell and prevailed hee wept and prayed unto him 12.4 all these arguments doe evidently shew that this was a corporall and reall wrestling 3. Neither yet was it only corporall but spirituall also for Iacob did as well contend by the strength of his Faith as by the force of his body Mercerus QUEST XII It was a good not an evill Angell that Iacob wrestled with FUrther a question is moved what manner of Angell this was with whom Iacob wrestled 1. Origen thinketh he did strive against some of the spirituall adversaries such as Saint Paul calleth Principalities and powers and spirituall wickednesses Ephes. 6.12 and that he was assisted by a good Angell 3. lib. Periarch Procopius reporteth the opinion of some that say it was the devill in Esaus likenesse that strived against Iacob and that by the power of an Angell he overcame who lest he should ascribe this victory to his owne strength smote him upon the thigh the Hebrewes say it was Sammael Esaus evill Angel that contended with Iacob for the blessing 2. But these are untrue and improbable assertions 1. Here is mention made but of one that Iacob wrestled with 2. Hee that he wrestled with was the same that blessed him 3. He that strived with him was the same that touched his thigh Ergo it was a good not an evill Angell for an evill Angell would not have blessed him Mercer Perer. QUEST XIII Whether it were a ministring spirit or God Christ with whom Iacob wrestled NEither was this any of the ministring Angels but Christ the Son of God here called a man because he so appeared Pererius striveth to prove that it was an Angell and not Christ. 1. Hosea calleth him an Angell without any addition 12.4 but when Christ is called an Angell some other word is added as the Angell of the covenant Malach. 3.1 Cont. In that place the Prophet sheweth that by the Angell we must understand God for he saith He had power with God and he had power over the Angell and further he found him in Bethel the Angell with whom Iacob wrestled was the same that spake to him in Bethel but he was God Gen. 31.13 I am the God of Bethel Neither alwayes is an epithete added when Christ is called an Angell as Gen. 48.16 Iacob saith The Angell which hath delivered mee from all evill blesse the children But this Angell without any other addition is else-where called the God of Bethel 2. If at any time in the old Testament the sonne of God appeared it is most like in mount Sinai when the Law was given which was the most famous and Noble apparition of all but S. Steven saith Yee have received the Law by the ordinance of Angels Act. 7.53 Angels then appeared not Christ Perer. Cont. The Angels then were ministring Spirits giving attendance and executing their office at the delivering of the Law but it is no good argument the Law was given by the Angels Ergo not by Christ for S. Paul affirmeth both It was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediator Galat. 3.19 the ministery was of the Angels the authority of Christ. 3. If Christ had appeared at any time then there was greatest cause when word was sent to Mary of the incarnation of the Sonne of God both because of the worthinesse of that mystery and dignity of the person to whom that message was brought Contra. 1. It was not fit that the Sonne of God himselfe should be the Messenger of his owne comming into the world Princes use to send their Ministers and officers before to bring tidings of their comming and it was fit that this great Prince should send his Angels before that it might appeare that he was even Lord of the Angels 2. There was greater reason that the same Angell Gabriel who was the first revealer of this prophecie to Daniel concerning the Messiah 〈…〉 〈…〉 QUEST XV. How it iâ— sâ—id he could not prevaile against Iacob Vers. 25. WHen he saw he could not prevaile 1. Not that either God gave unto Iacob greater strength to resist than the Angell had to assault him as some of the Hebrewes thinke that it was Esaus Angell and so had no greater power than God permitted him for it was no such Angell as is shewed before 2. Neither as Cajetane thinketh Factum est ut Angelus assumeret corpus in 〈◊〉 mensâ—ra virium c. It came so to passe that the Angell assumed a body in such measure of strength as should not be able to overcome Iacâ—b 3. Neither as Tostatus Angelus 〈…〉 non posse superare The Angell fained that he could not overcome Iacob for I have declared before that it was Christ himselfe and not an Angell that wrestled with Iacob 4. Wherefore in that it is said when he saw here the Lord descendeth to our capacity for he knew before the event of this combat and what he had purposed to doe the experience then of the thing is taken for Gods knowledge Calvin and the Lord with the blast of his mouth had beene able to have confounded Iacob But he could not prevaile c. that is the Lord did both fight in and against Iacob he gave Iacob strength to resist and so in Iacob he overcommeth and seipso 〈◊〉 est and so is stronger than himselfe Calvin Thus in effect God could not prevaile against Iacob because hee would not he disposeth of his power according to his owne will and purpose so the Angell said to Lot I can doe nothing till thou be come thither Gen. 19.22 and the Lord to Moses thus saith Let me alone c. Exod. 32.10 Hereby the Lord sheweth how effectuall the faith and prayer of his servants are which as it were binde the Lords hands and doe give us victory in a manner against himselfe QUEST XVI In what place of the thigh Iacob was hurt Vers. 25. HE tâ—â—ched the hollow of his thigh 1. This was neither the inward or broad part of the thigh as the Septuagint read 2. Neither yet was the huckle-bone put out of joynt as some thinke for that could not be without great paine and griefe to Iacob 3. But whereas the word is caph which signifieth the bowing or hollow and so is taken for the palme of the hand and sole of the foot here it properly betokeneth the hollow bone into the which the huckle-bone called ischion runneth we may name it acetabulum the pan of the huckle-bone this hollow bone was not out of joynt but it onely hanged by reason of the sinew or nerve that goeth out of the pan or hollow to the huckle-bone which was hurt as it is expressed vers 32. QUEST XVII How long Iacob continued in his halting NOw whereas Tostatus thinketh that Iacob the next day was perfectly recovered of this hurt to whom Iunius subscribeth because cap. 33.18 it is said that Iacob came safe to Sichem I thinke rather
observation that Cherubim with van alwayes signifieth the creature but without van the worke it selfe of Cherubims But this observation doth not alwayes hold for in this place cherub 〈◊〉 the singular number is expressed with van though Cherubim in the plurall be written without is 〈…〉 they both in this place doe signifie the worke of the Cherubims 6. Therefore the best and 〈◊〉 sense of this word is to signifie a beautifull picture and is metaphorically translated from externall and materiall things to spirituall because the Angels are beautified and adorned with many excellent 〈…〉 In which sense the King of Tyrus in respect of his glorious state is called the annointed Cherub Ezech. 28.14 QUEST XXV What forme and fashion these Cherubims were of COncerning the forme and fashion of these Cherubims there are divers opinions 1. Iosephus thinketh they had the similitude of certain birds which are not knowne unto us being found only in the remote parts of the world and the reason of his opinion may be this lest if they had beene after the similitude of any knowne thing it might have ministred occasion of idolatry But Iosephus is convinced by that which is written Gen. 3. that the Cherubims were see to keepe the way to Paradise they were not fowles or other winged beasts but Angels which kept that way neither was there here any feare of idolatry because these Cherubims were not in the open view and sight of the people but in the most holy place whither none had accesse but only the high 〈◊〉 and that once in the yeere 2. R. Abraham Ab. Ezra thinketh that the Cherubims doe signifie any shape either of bird beast or man as Ezech. 1. the beasts which appeared having the face of an Eagle a Lion a Bullock a Man are chap. 10. called Cherubims Contra. The Prophet calleth them Cherubims not in respect of that forme and shape wherein they appeared but because he knew thâ—m to be Angels and blessed spirits that so appeared therefore he giveth the 〈◊〉 name to them all and there their forme and shape is expressed but when they are called Cherubims without any determination of their forme they are alwayes held to have appeared in humane shape Tostat. qu. 〈◊〉 3. Oleaster leaveth not this matter indifferent as Ab. Ezra but thinketh that these Cherubims had rather formam animalium the sonne of beasts such as Ezechiel describeth than of men because it is no where expressed that the Cherubims had the shape of men as there they are described to have the faces of beasts and beside if they had beene made like men with hands that would have hindered the stretching out of their wings Contra. 1. As though the Cherubims in Ezechiel are not as well said to have had the face of a man as of other creatures there expressed 2. To take away the other doubt and difficulty we need not imagine with Montanus who seâ—â—eth forth the Cherubs with wings only without hands for that were an imperfect forme to give them the shape of a man without hands and the Cherubs described Ezech. 1 8. had 〈◊〉 which came under their wings but the Cherubs might very well be described with stretching out wings notwithstanding their hands which they either touched the mercy seat with as some thinke 〈◊〉 her held them upright as praysing God as R. Salomon 4. Montanus saith 〈…〉 That these Cherubs were divers in the shape of male and female But that is not like 〈◊〉 they were made to represent the Angels and blessed Spirits where is no diversity of sex of male or female 5. The opinion than of R. Salomon is the â—â—st that the Cherubs were pictured and portraited in humane shape in the forme of young men because so the Angels used to appeare in times past as to Abraham and Lot and they 〈…〉 the Angeli were sent from heaven they are said to flie as birds 〈…〉 the ground Tostat. And what shape the Cherubims were of 〈…〉 be gathered by the description 〈◊〉 those which Salomon made which stood upright on their feet 2 Chron. 3. â—3 〈…〉 understood of any other than the humane shape Pelarg. Ribera They were pictured with wings and not naked as Montanus describeth them but clothed and apparelled because it is forbiddâ—nâ— chap. 20. 〈…〉 should be discovered at Gods Altar Iunius QUEST XXVI 〈…〉 Cherubim 〈◊〉 Seraphim BUt it will here 〈…〉 these are called Cherubim rather then Seraphim which is another name giâ—en 〈◊〉 Angels 〈…〉 1. Some were of opinion that they might indifferently be called either Cherubim or Seraphim but Hierom confuteth them writing 〈…〉 say in their prayers Thou which sittest 〈…〉 no where used in Scripture but only 〈…〉 2. Others answer that the Seraphim◠〈…〉 which shall be revealed in the next world the Cherubims ad ministerium for the ministery and service of God and therefore the Cherubims are here pictured rather than the Seraphims Contra. 1. But the most holy place where these Cherubims were set was made to represent Gods glory therefore the Cherubim served here to set forth Gods glory 2. The Seraphims also were ministring Spirits as well as the Cherubims as they are set forth Isay 6. 3. Neither is it a sufficient answer to say that the Seraphims appeared with six wings a peece Isay 6. and these had but two they were therefore Cherubims not Seraphims for the Cherubs that here were described but with two wings Ezach 1.6 were said to have foure So that if that were a good reason these should neither be called Cherubims Therefore they are not so called or distinguished in respect of their more or fewer wings for the Angels being Spirits have neither wings nor any other visible shape of themselves but they are described and called diversly according to those severall offices and imployments wherein it pleaseth God to use them 4. Ribera maketh this to be the reason why God is said to fit upon the Cherubims which word signifieth multitude of knowledge to shew that God farre exceedeth the wisdome and knowledge even of those excellent Spirits and therefore he is said to sit above the Cherubims But beside that this signification of the word Cherub hath no ground as is before shewed God in this sense might as well be said to fit betweene the Seraphim which signifieth burning as fire for the Lord in brightnesse and in fiery justice exceedeth the Angels 5. This reason then may rather be yeelded Visiones ad rerum sâ—â—arum argumenta accommodanda sunt Visions must be applied unto the argument and scope of the things themselves Iun. in Isai. 6.2 Now because Seraphim is a name given to the Angels in respect of their fiery and purging zeale they are so called when they are sent to purge and cleanse the world in being ministers of Gods judgements but Cherubim being a title of love and favour being taken for a beautifull and lovely picture this name was more fit to be used in this place these
made the creatures and last of all man whom he created for his glorie So after that God had appointed the Tabernacle to be made and every thing thereto belonging he in the last place setteth downe the office and ministration of the Priests who served to set forth Gods glory in the Tabernacle as man was created to that end in the world Borrh. 5. And to this end God ordained the ministerie of man in his service to succour and releeve the imbecillitie of the people who were not able themselves to endure the Lords voice Simlerus QUEST II. Why Aaron was chosen to be the high Priest Vers. 1. THy brother Aaron 1. The Lord maketh speciall choice of Aaron Moses brother for the Priesthood Propter principatum frequentia cum Deo colloquia Because of his preeminence and for the often conference they had with God and the great works which were done in Egypt by the hands of Moses and Aaron And therefore because in these respects they were more noble and famous than the rest of the people the Lord doth single out Aaron for this high office Simler 2. And the Tribe of Levi was taken from the rest of the Tribes Ad honorem Mosis Aaron ducum populi c. For the honour of Moses and Aaron the captaines of the people Ferus 3 And Aaron was appointed to be the high and chiefe Priest to be a figure and type of Christ Simlerus The divers glorious vestures made for the Priest doe shadow forth the most heavenly graces of the Spirit wherewith Christ was adorned Ferus And he is therefore called Moses brother Quiâ— enim ampliùs alâ—eri est fraterâ—â— foedere nexus quà m Christuâ— Mosi legi gratia novum Testamentum veteri For who can be neerer allied unto another by a brotherly league than Christ to Moses grace to the law the new Testament to the old Beda QUEST III Wherein the Priesthood of Christ and of Aaron agree and disagree NOw Aaron in some things most fitly resembled Christ and in some things betweene them there is great difference First Aaron herein prefigured Christ both in his peculiar function in entring into the holy place to make attonement for the people So Christ is now entred into the heavens to appeare in the fight of God for us Hebr. 9.23 As also in those functions which were common to Aaron with the rest which were these three dâ—cendo precando offerâ—â—do in teaching praying offering or sacrificing So Christ hath taught and lightned the world with the revelation of his Fathers will and by the preaching of the Gospell Christ also prayeth and maketh intercession for his people Heb. 9.25 And he also offered up himselfe in sacrifice for our redemption Tit. 2.19 Hee gave himselfe for us that hee might redeeme us from all iniquitie But yet there is great difference betweene the Priesthood of Aaron which was the type and figure and the everlasting Priesthood of Christ. 1. In the dignitie of their persons Aaron was a meere man Christ was both God and man 2. In their condition the Priests of the Law were men compassed with many infirmities and subject to sinne but Christ was holy harmelesse undefiled separate from sinners Heb. 9.26 3. In the excellencie of the sacrifice they offered the sacrifices of beasts but Christ offered up his owne bodie as the Apostle saith Heb. 9.12 Neither by the bloud of goats and calves but by his owne bloud entred he once into the holy place 4. In the effect they differ the Priests of the law did not perfectly reconcile but onely shadowed forth by that typicall reconciliation the true remission of sinnes by the bloud of Christ who hath obtained eternall redemption for us and hath redeemed us from the curse of the law Galath 3.13 5. In the continuance the Priesthood of Aaron was not to continue for ever but as the Apostle saith This man because he endureth for ever hath an everlasting Priesthood Heb. 2.24 6. In the manner of confirmation They were made Priests without an oath But this is made with an oath by him that said unto him The Lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedeck Heb. 5.21 Marbach QUEST IV. Why Christ is called a Priest after the order of Melchisedeck and not of Aaron ANd although Aaron were a type and figure of Christ yet he is called a Priest after the order of Melchisedeck and not after Aaron not because there was no resemblance betweene Christ and Aaron but for that Melchisedeck and his Priesthood did in three things more lively set forth Christs Priesthood than did Aarons 1. In the eternitie thereof 2. Office and function 3. And name 1. As Melchisedeck is set forth without father and mother without beginning of his dayes or end of his life not that he was so indeed but they are concealed in storie to make him a more lively type and figure of Christ who was in respect of his Divinitie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without mother in regard of his humanitie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without father 2 As Melchisedek was both a King and a Priest so Christ was a Priest in the expiation of our sinnes by the sacrifice of himselfe upon the crosse and a King both in gathering his Church together by the scepter of his word and governing them by his Spirit as also in that all power over all creatures and over the universall world is committed unto him 3. The name of Melchisedek fitly agreeth unto Christ which signifieth the King of righteousnesse and the place whereof he was King which was Salem that betokeneth peace did also set forth the peaceable Kingdome of Christ both making peace betweene God and us and taking away the wall of partition that was betweene the Jewes and Gentiles making of both one as the Apostle sheweth Ephes. 2.13 Now in Christ Iesuâ— yee which were once a farre off are made neere by the bloud of Christ for he is our peace which hath made of both one Marbach QUEST V. Why these Priestly garments are commanded to be made Vers. 2. HOly garments c. glorious and beautifull 1. These garments were called holy in two respects both because in respect of the end they were consecrated and ordained onely to holy uses and therefore the Priests onely were to put them on and none other beside and they were not at all times to use them but onely when they went into the Tabernacle when they went out they put them off as also in respect of the manner of consecration they were anointed with the holy oyle chap. 30. and so set apart for holy uses Tostat. quaest 2. 2. This apparelling of Aaron with such glorious apparell was commanded both in respect of themselves that they by these ceremonies might bee assured that their calling was of God Ferus 3. And in regard of the people hereby the Lord would have their ministerie the more reverenced and had in
But it seemeth that this great defection was about the seventh age for then Lamech of Cains race tooke unto him two wives then the Lord tooke away righteous Henoch that he should bee no longer grieved with the wickednesse of the world Then the world being replenished with great multitudes which are ring-leaders for the most part unto evill as it is written thou shalt not follow a multitude to doe evill began to give themselves to all kinde of wickednesse adultery oppression cruelty multiplicity of wives unlawfull lust even against nature and to fill the earth with uncleannesse 3. And although in this seventh age iniquity was come to the full height yet it began long before even in the dayes of Enos when as the righteous abhorring the great wickednesse of Cains posterity separated themselves and a part beganne to call upon the name of God Iun. 4. The Hebrewes note that at the beginning women were not so multiplied as afterward by whom they tooke occasion to sinne and therefore it is added there were daughters borne unto them c. vers 1. but this clause sheweth not a more speciall multiplying of that kinde but that when the world began to be stored both with men and women then they gave themselves to wantonnesse QVEST. III. The particular sin of the old world here noted Vers. 2. THey saw the daughters of men that they were faire c. 1. Their fault was not onely in that they of the righteous seed matched into Cains stocke Calvin 2. Or that they respected onely beauty having no regard to their piety and vertue Marlorat 3. But they by violence tooke unto them not to their wives but women for so with Mercerus and Iunius I rather interpret the word nashim from all men whatsoever as Iunius readeth both virgines and wives they cared not whom 4. Some Hebrewes here understand also the filthy sinne of buggery that they tooke all they liked even from among the bruit beasts but Moses speaketh onely of the daughters of men QVEST. IV. Who were these sonnes of God Vers. THen the sonnes of God 1. These sonnes of God were not the Angels which some have supposed to have fallen for their intemperancie with women and to have begotten of them spirits as Ioseph Philo Iustine Clemens Alexandrinus Tertullian conjectured who so expoundeth that place of S. Paul that women should be covered because of the Angels lest they should bee tempted with their beauty This opinion is easily confuted 1. Because the world was punished and God was angry not for the sinne of Angels but of men vers 3. My spirit shall not alway strive with man 2. Chrysostome urgeth that place Matth. 22. in the resurrection they neither marry nor are married but are the Angels Ergo Angels are not subject to carnall affections as men are 3. If Angels fell first for the love of women then they sinned not for 1000. yeares after the creation whereas the Scripture sheweth that the Devill was a murtherer and a liar from the beginning Ioh. 8.44 QVEST. V. Devils not corporall nor mortall IT is also absurd and improbable that these were devils which did company with women and of them came Gyants as thinketh Franciscus Georgius who affirmeth devils to have bodies and a generative faculty and to company with women Of the like opinion is Psellus that the devils have bodies and they are nourished by sucking and attraction as spunges and that they are males and females at their pleasures some are of a fiery some ayrie some a watery some of a terrene nature But these are fables and fictions fit rather to be laughed at than worthy to be confuted 1. The Devils are of a spirituall not corporall nature it appeareth by that story Luk. 8. where we reade that in one man there was a legion that is six thousand Devils how could so many spirits if they were corporall be included in one body 2. If they were of a fierie watery or earthly so of an elementall nature they should bee subject to corruption mutability and mortality and so some have imagined also as Plutarch writeth of the death of the great Pan a famous Devill among the Pagans and Cardane reporteth that he heard his Father say who was above thirty years familiar with the Devils that he learned of them that they doe die decay revive againe but this fancie is contrary to the Scripture which testifieth that the Devill hath beene a murtherer from the beginning of the world Ioh. 8 44 Ergo he hath continued from the beginning of the world and how should the soule of man be immortall if these spirits which are of a more subtill nature were mortall 3. Though it were granted that Devills have a kinde of airie bodies yet could they not ingender for the power of generation agreeth onely to perfect bodies which have their materiall and distinct parts and receive nourishment 4. And they being as they say male and female should ingender among themselves in their owne kinde 5. Or if they did company with women they could not beget men but multiply their owne kinde or at the least a mixt kinde as the mule is engendred of an horse and an asse and so some likewise have conceited that the Faunes and Satyres were the off-spring of such generation As Hierom in the life of Antonie reporteth that such an one appeared unto him in the wildernesse with goats feet long crooked nailes and hornes upon his head and spake unto Antonie but either this may be held to be a fable foisted under Hieromes name or if there were any such thing it might be some monster of the wildernesse which the Devill used as his trunke to speake out of QVEST. VI. Spirits doe not generate BUt much more absurd is the opinion of Paulus Burgensis that thinketh these which companied with the daughters of men were spirits called Incubi which doe assume bodies of the aire for a time representing the shape sometime of men sometime of women in the act of generation and then they are called Succubi and thus saith he were the Giants engendred and Tostatus approoving this conceit of Incubi and Succubi seemeth to give credit to that report of Merlin that he was begotten by a spirit In these assertions and uncertaine conjectures of men some what is true some part false 1. True it is that the Devill may appeare in the shape of man or woman and dissemble and counterfeit the act proper to both not that the spirits have any delight in such carnall acts having no true but assumed and counterfeit bodies but they doe it more strongly to delude men and women and entice them to that abominable sinne of the flesh which they know hath corrupted the hearts of many excellent men as of David Salomon 2. Though spirits can take upon them the shape of bodies yet they are but so to the eye they are not true bodies being easily
and blesseth God he blesseth neither bread nor wine the Preist blesseth and halloweth the cup. 4. He bringeth forth bread and wine to Abraham the Priest onely delivereth bread to the people and keepeth backe the cup. 5. Melchisedeck brought bread and wine in substance as is touched before the Masse-priest saith their substance is changed 6. Melchisedeck worshippeth God not the bread and wine the Masse-priest adoreth both So that in truth this example of Melchesedeck if they will stand to their tackling maketh altogether against the popish Masse sacrifice and nothing for it 4. Confut. Wherein Melchisedecks Priesthood consisted WHerein then the comparison holdeth betweene Christ and Melchisedeck the Apostle sheweth Heb. 7. 1. As Melchisedeck is interpreted a King of righteousnesse so our blessed Saviour was indeed a King of righteousnesse Isay. 11.4 With righteousnesse shall he judge the poore 2. Melchisedeck was King of Salem that is of peace Heb. 7.2 so the Messias is a Prince of peace Isa. 9.6 3. Melchisedeck was without father or mother that is they are not mentioned in the story but Christ was truly without father as he was man and without mother as God 4. Melchisedeck was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without genealogie so none can declare Christs generation as he is God Isa. 53.8 5. Melchisedeck had no beginning of his life or end of his dayes that is expressed in the Scripture but Christ the word is truly without beginning being from all eternity neither shall he have any end He is Alpha and Omega the beginning and the end Revel 1.8 6. As Melchisedeck was both a King and a Priest so our Saviour is Prince of all the Kings of the earth Revel 1.5 and he is our great high Priest Heb. 4.14 7. But especially in these three points following did Melchisedeck resemble our Saviour as Melchisedeck was not a Priest anointed with any materiall oyle as Aaron but declared so to be by Gods owne mouth and the testimony of the spirit so Christ was anointed by the spirit of God Luk. 4.18 and made a Priest by an oath The Lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedeck Heb. 7.21 8. As Melchisedeck was greater than Abraham for he blessed him and than Levi that payed riches in Abrahams loynes Heb. 7.4.9.10 so the Priesthood of Christ is greater than the Priesthood of Aaron 9. But herein most of all is Melchisedeck likened to the sonne of God because he received his Priesthood from none nor passed it over to any other in like manner as Christ succeeded none so neither doe any succeed him but he endureth ever and hath everlasting Priesthood Heb. 7.24 Object As Christs Priesthood is everlasting so it was necessary that he should have a sacrifice which should continue for ever 1. Which cannot bee the sacrifice upon the Crosse for that was but once done 2. Therefore it can be no other than the sacrifice of the Eucharist 3. neither doth it suffice to say that the efficacie or vertue of his sacrifice upon the Crosse continueth for ever for in this sense Noahs sacrifice might be said to be eternall because the efficacie of it remaineth still in keeping the world from being destroyed by water Perer. disp 7. in 14. Genes Answ. 1. But the Apostle sheweth the contrary that the once oblation of Christs body is that everlasting sacrifice of our high Priest Heb. 10.14 With one offering hath he consecrated for ever them that are sanctified 2. But the dayly sacrifice of the Masse it cannot be the Apostle saith which needed not dayly as those high Priests to offer up sacrifice Heb. 7.27 that cannot be an everlasting sacrifice which is dayly renewed and the sacrifice offered in the Church shall determine with the militant state thereof in earth and therefore cannot be everlasting 3. Noahs sacrifice procured no eternall or spirituall but a temporall benefit though to continue while this world lasteth and Christs sacrifice gave that durable force to Noahs sacrifice which was a figure thereof therefore Noahs sacrifice cannot be called everlasting or himselfe an everlasting Priest seeing that efficacie was not in himselfe or his sacrifice but in Christ the everlasting Redeemer and Priest 6. Places of Morall observation 1. Observ. Light afflictions goe before heavy judgements Vers. 2. THese made warre with Bala king of Sodom c. The Lord before he purposeth to bring an utter destruction upon any doth first admonish them with light punishments so he healeth with Sodome first they are scourged by these foure Kings of the East but seeing they received no warning thereby afterward the Lord rained upon them fire and brimstone Perer. We learne then that we should not neglect the gentle corrections of God lest they draw on heavy judgements thus God dealt with his owne people who were chastised sometime by a famine by the sword by the pestilence but when none of these would serve they were swept away and carried into captivity 2. Observ. To dwell among the wicked is dangerous FUrther in that Lot was carried away with the Sodomites we see that good men may together with the wicked taste of temporall judgements and what a dangerous thing it is to have any habitation or dwelling among the ungodly Muscul. therefore the Scripture saith Goe out of her my people that ye be not partakers in her sinnes that ye receive not of her plagues Revel 18.4 3. Observ. Rebellion no not against hard governours is to be attempted Vers. 4. TWelve yeares were they subject c. but in the thirteenth they rebelled first we see the justice of God in punishing the wicked life of the Sodomites with a tyrannicall government so the Prophet pronounceth this a curse upon the ungodly set thou a wicked man over him Psal. 109.6 Beside God punisheth the Sodomites for their rebellion where then a government is established though it be hard and unjust nothing is tumultuously to be attempted against it as the Lord commandeth that the King of Babylon who was but an hard Lord should be served and obeyed Ier. 27.8 Calvin 4. Observ. Riches evill gotten commeth to an evill end Vers. 12. THey tooke all the substance of Sodome c. They which used not their wealth to the good and comfort of the poore as the Sodomites did not Esech 16.49 doe heape it up to bee a prey for the enemie Calvin so the King of Babel boasteth That as a nest he had found the riches of the people Isa. 10.14 which they had first wrongfully scraped together 5. Observ. Gods enemies and the enemies of our Church our enemies Vers. 20. WHich hath delivered thine enemies c. Lots enemies are called Abrahams enemies and so indeed wee should account the enemies of Gods people and Church our enemies though in particular they have not hurt us Luther So the Prophet saith Doe not I hate them that hate thee c. I hate them with an unfained hatred as though
2. Neither is the reason hereof because Pharao was a more wicked King though Abimelech seeme to bee the honester man for the beginning of Gods mercy is from him not from us 3. But the difference of this proceeding commeth from the mercifull disposition of God who will have mercy on whom he will Rom. 9.15 QVEST. VI. Of divine dreames and the diversity thereof Vers. 3. IN a dreame by night 1. The visions which are shewed in the day are more excellent than those which fall upon men in the night if all other circumstances be alike not onely for that it must be a greater propheticall power which can sequester the soule from the thoughts and cares of the day wherein it is occupied than in the silence of the night which is Aquinas reason but because all the powers of the soule when the body is watching are in their operation and working and so better prepared for heavenly contemplation an argument hereof may be this that dreames in the night have beene shewed to naturall and carnall men as to Pharao Nebuchadnezer but visions of the day are shewed to the faithfull as to Daniel and Peter Act. 10. 2. Yet the person of Abimelech considered who was in the day occupied in the affaires of his kingdome the night was a fitter season for him to be drawne to heavenly meditation Muscul. 3. There are two sorts of divine dreames one which is by representations and similitudes of other things such were the dreames of Pharao and Nebuchadnezer the other is a more excellent kinde when one heareth God speake to him as Abimelech here or an Angell as Ioseph Matth. 1. or some man as Paul Act. 16.9 And these more noble dreames are for the most part shewed to the servants of God Perer. 4. But we must take heed that we ascribe not too much to dreames and to make those divine that are not which may be thus discerned 1. The dreames which God sendeth are good and godly not favouring of any carnall thing 2. They are sent upon grave and weighty occasions 3. And for the most part to men fearing God 4. And they leave a certaine perswasion and inward sense of Godâ— presence in the soule Muscul. QVEST. VII Why the Lord saith of Abraham he is a Prophet Vers. 7. DEliver the man his wife againe for he is a Prophet and he shall pray c. 1. Some make this clause for he is a Prophet a reason of the former sentence of delivering his wife because he being a Prophet did know that he had not come neare her and therefore Abimelech need not doubt to deliver her Iunius Perer. 2. Or he is a Prophet and deare unto me and the wrong offered to him I will revenge as done unto my selfe Iun. 3. Because he is a Prophet marvell not that this punishment is laid upon thee for doing wrong to such an excellent man Calvin 4. But it is better referred to the words following he is a Prophet and an holy man and therefore shall pray for thee and his prayers shall prevaile Musculus QUEST VIII Of divers kindes of prophesying THis word Prophet or to prophesie is diversly taken in Scripture 1. He is called a Prophet to whom things secret and hid were revealed and the knowledge of things to come by the spirit of God such in times past were called seers 1 Sam. 9.9 2. They were called Prophets among the heathen whosoever could foretell things to come as some did by the subtilty of Satan so Saint Paul calleth Epimenides the Cretensian Prophet Tit. 1.3 Thirdly they were called Prophets that had a speciall gift to indite hymnes and songs to the praise of God 1 Chron. 25.3 Ieduthun is said to have prophesied upon the harpe 4. They were said to prophesie which did imitate onely the Prophets outward gesture when they were beside themselves as Saul prophesied when the evill spirit came upon him 1 Sam. 18.10 that is his outward gesture and behaviour was as of a man beside himselfe 5. They were so called Prophets that were Expounders and Interpreters of Scriptures so is it taken 1 Cor. 14. so Aaron was Moses Prophet Exod. 7.1 that is his spokesman Exod. 3.16 QVEST. IX Two sorts of Prophets BUt a Prophet is taken properly the first way whereof there were two sorts 1. They were called Prophets which had secrets revealed unto them to publish by writing and preaching to the people and in this sense the word Nabi a Prophet commeth of Nub which is to speake 2. They also were called Prophets who though they preached not yet God revealed many things unto them and used them familiarly and in this sense Nabi shall be derived of ban which is to understand of this sort was Abraham a Prophet To stat Oleaster ex Perer. QVEST. X. How Sarah is said to be Abrahams sister Vers. 12. YEt in very deed she is my sister c. 1. Neither is their opinion sound that thinke Sarah to have beene Abrahams owne sister by his father not by his mother sic Lyppoman Satus Cajetanus for such mariages were not in use among the faithfull in Abrahams time 2. Neither was she the daughter of Terah his brother adopted by Terah for Abraham saith she was the daughter of his father 3. Therefore Chrysostomes sentence is to have bin preferred that holdeth Sara to have bin the daughter of Haran Arbahams brother whom Thare had by one woman Abraham by another this Haran died a long time before his father so that Sarah after the death of her father might very well be called the daughter of Terah because he was her grandfather and he was also in stead of her father being dead 5. And whereas Abraham saith In very deed shee is my sisterâ— he saith not that she was properly his sister being his Neece but he saith In very deed to free himselfe from the suspition of lying See more of this matter Gen. 11.4.18 QVEST. XI How much the sickle was in values Vers. 16. A Thousand peeces or sickles of silver The common sickle neither was of so little value as one Ribera affirmeth out of Budeus as equivolent to the Atticke drachma or groat which is the eighth part of an ounce 2. Nor yet doth it countervaile foure drachmaes or groats as Iosephus 3. Nor an whole ounce as Hierome 4. But the common sickle doth weigh ten gerahs the sickle of the Sanctuary was double of twenty gerahs in weight Exod. 30.13 and every gerah did weigh sixteene barley cornes so that the common sickle did weigh 160. barley cornes that is two drachmaes and somewhat more Iunius and therefore the 70. translate the sickle didrachma a double groat that is a quarter of an ounce about fourteene pence starling QVEST. XII Who is said to be the vaile of Sarahs eyes Vers. 16. HE is a vaile of thine eyes to all that are with thee c. 1. This is neither to be referred to the gift which Abimelech gave 1. As though he had given
that it belongeth to parents to provide that their children bee honestly bestowed in marriage and that children ought not contract themselves without the consent of their parents Abraham provideth a wife for Isaack Gen. 24.4 Isaack for Iaacob 28.2 By Moses law the daughters vow was not good unlesse the father did ratifie it Numb 30.6 Wherefore the canon law is injurious that alloweth contracts and espousals made without consent of the parents Muscul. 4. Doct. We must only sweare by the name of God and not of Saints Vers. 23. SWeare unto me here by God Abimelech though himselfe as it is likely were a worshipper of other Gods yet exacteth no other oath of Abraham but to sweare by God only superstitious then is the use of papists that urge men to sweare not only by God but by the Virgin Mary and other Saints whereas the Scripture saith thou shalt feare the Lord thy God and sweare by his name Deut. 6.13 Muscul. 5. Doct. Lawfull to take an oath before a Mâ—gistrate Vers. 24. ABraham said I will sweare This example condemneth the Anabaptists and sheweth that it is lawfull to take an oath before the civill Magistrate either to testifie the truth for the ending of strife Heb. 6. v. 12. or for the confirming of a â—â—â—gue and performing and keeping of faith as there was an oath betweene Iacob and Laban Gen. 31.50 Luther 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. No Sacraments but commanded of God Vers. 4. ABraham circumcised Isaack c. as God had commanded Wherefore in religious duties and especially in the administration of the Sacraments we must follow Gods ordinance and commandement nothing ought to be altered added and changed in the substance and necessary parts thereof otherwise than God hath left them Saint Paul delivereth to the Corinthians the same which hee received of the Lord 1 Cor. 11.23 The Church of Rome is found then to bee a falsifier and corrupter of Gods ordinance who have brought in seven Sacraments whereas the Lord commanded but two and these also of Gods institution they have defiled with many vaine inventions and idle superstitious ceremonies of their owne Calvin 2. Confut. Hagar was not Abrahams wife Vers. 11. THis was very grievous in Abrahams sight because of his sonne not because of Hagar it seemeth then that Hagar was not Abrahams wife as Pererius thinketh for these reasons 1. Because Abrahams affection would have beene greater to his wife than to his childe 2. Hagar is called a bond-woman still but if she had beene Abrahams wife she had beene free neither would Abraham if she were his wife have committed her to the power and government of Sarah as he did Gen. 16.6 Behold thy maid is in thine hand doe with her as it pleaseth thee The husband only in the family is the governour and head of the wife 3. It is not likely that Abraham should have beene commanded to send Hagar away never to returne if she had beene his wife the Scripture alloweth no such perpetuall separation but in case of fornication Matth. 5.35 Whosoever shall put away his wife except for fornication causeth her to commit adultery Neither are the contrary reasons of any value 1. Thom. Aquin. saith that as in the law Moses allowed to give a bill of divorcement ad evitandum uxoricidium to avoyd wive-slaughter so it was lawfull for Abraham to cast out Hagar for the manifesting of that mystery expressed by Saint Paul Galat. 4. Contra 1. Aquinas then thinketh that the very mariage was dissolved which Pererius denieth as shall even now appeare 2. That which Moses permitted was no approbation but a toleration as our Saviour saith for the hardnesse of their hearts Matth. 29.6 but this fact of Abraham was lawfull and commendable the examples therefore is not alike 3. God will not have his commandement broken to make a mysterie but if Hagar had beene Abrahams wife he in putting her away had violated that precept they two shal be one flesh 4. the mysterie better holdeth to make Ismael the sonne of Abrahams bond-maid rather than of his wife 2. Perer. this was done not by the will of Abraham but by the councell of God therefore Abraham might put her away though his wife in v. 21. Contra. 1. proove her first to be Abrahams wife and then I will yeeld that at Gods commandement she might be put away But this being the thing in question whether she were Abrahams wife it is more probable that she was not because of this seperatioÌ„ 2 God useth not to dispense extraordinarily with his law whereas his purpose and will may otherwise be effected as in this case the counsell of God for casting out of Hagar might stand without any contradiction to Gods precept if Hagar be held to be Abrahams concubine rather than his wife 3. We find in scripture that God brought man and wife together as Eve to Adam the Angell bid Ioseph not to feare to take Mary whom hee purposed secretly to send away but of Gods separating of man and wife but in the case excepted we read not 3. This separation was only from bed and bord not otherwise the marriage knot remained insoluble and untied still Perer. ibid. Cont. If the marriage bond remained how came it to passe that Abraham after Sarahs death tooke a new wife Keturah and not his former wife Hagar 4. But the Scripture saith Hagar was Abrahams wife Gen. 16.3 Sarah gave her to Abraham for his wife Contra. 1. The meaning only is that Sarah gave Hagar to be in stead of his wife in this office only for procreation of children and to be in her place for shee saith It may be I shall receive a childe by her neither is Hagar accounted afterward as a wife but an handmaid still 2. or wee may say that Hagar is here called a wife improprié improperly for Sarah had no power to give Abraham another wife Calvin 3. Confut. Many challenge to be true Catholikes which are not Vers. 10. THe sonne of this bond-woman shall not be heire Like as Ismael did challenge the birth-right and despised Isaack and by his mothers instigation sought the inheritance and bare himselfe bold of his eldership so it is no marvell if that they which are but a bastard Church and Pseudocatholikes doe appropriate unto themselves the name of the Church of Christ like to those of whom the spirit of God speaketh which were of the Synagogue of Satan calling themselves Iewes and were not Revel 3.9 But as Ismael for all his bragging was no whit nearer the inheritance so these bolstred out and embossed titles will no sooner make them the Church of God 4. Confut. Not lawfull to make allegories of Scripture THough Saint Paul having the instinct of Gods Spirit doth allegorize the history of Sarah and Hagar it is therefore no warrant to every expositer and interpreter to make allegories of Scripture which corrupt use the Romane Synagogue alloweth and others practise 1. Saint Pauls
for God expresseth no condition in his promise 4. Nor yet need we answer that Iacob doth not vow the generall worship of God whereunto he was bound by his profession having received circumcision but a speciall service in consecrating that place to Gods service and offering of tythes or that it is lawfull for a man to tie himselfe by a new bond to performe that to God which he is otherwise bound to doe as the Prophet David saith Psal. 119.126 I have sworne and will performe it that I will keepe thy righteous judgements both these answers are true though not pertinent to this place ex Perer. 5. Wherefore Iacob doth not bring this forth as a condition If God will be with me this particle im is not here a conditionall but a word of time as it is taken vers 15. untill if that is when I have performed c. so is it taken here when God hath beene with me and kept me in this journey Iun Mercer and the words following are not to be read then the Lord shall be my God but when the Lord hath beene my God so they are not parcell of the vow which is complete in the 22. vers but they are part of the reason of this vow Rasi Iun. QUEST XVIII To whom Iacob voweth to pay the tenth Vers. 22. I Will give the tenth 1. Some thinke that he payed the tenth to Sem or Eber but Sem died before Iacob was borne and Eber also was dead many yeares before this in the 19. yeare of Iacob who is now supposed to have beene 77. yeare old 2. Therefore this giving of tithe was nothing else but the consecrating of the tenth part of his goods to be bestowed in building of Altars and in sacrifices for the service of God and such things as are devoted to religious uses are truly said to be given unto God sic Cajetan Mercer 3. Some Hebrewes referre this to the consecrating of Levi to the Priesthood but as Aben Ezra not men but cattell and beasts used to be tithed 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The ministery of Angels Vers. 12. THe Angell of God went up and downe By this is expressed the ministery of the Angels that are continually imployed for the good of the elect they ascend to report our necessities they descend to be ministers of Gods mercies as the Apostle saith Are they not all ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Heb. 1.14 2. Doct. How Gods providence is seene in permitting evill to be done in the world HEreby also is set forth Gods providence that watcheth over all things for the Lord standeth upon the top of this ladder whereby is signified the administration and government of the world Against which providence whereas it is objected that many evill things are committed in the world to the which the Lord is no way consenting Thomas Aquine answereth that although some defects are against the particular nature of things yet they are for the good of the universall and therefore as Augustine saith Deus non sineret malumesse in operib suis nisi sciret benefacere etiam de malâ— God would not suffer evill to be in his works if he did not know how to turne evill into good But it will be said God ought to draw men against their will unto good Dionysius answereth Non est providentia divinae violare naturam sed est cujusque naturae conservatrix Gods providence doth not change or violate nature but is the preserver of naâ—ure leaving to things indued with reason to follow their owne will and inclination Lib. de Divin nominib cap. 4 par 4. 3. Doct. How God forsaketh not the elect finally Vers. 15. I Will not forsake thee c. Gods promises to his servants are so stable and firme in Christ that they are sure finally not to be forsaken as the Lord said to Iosua I will never faile thee nor forsake thee Heb. 13.4 Calvin 4. Doct. Lawfull to vow Vers. 20. IF God will be with me c. By Iacobs vowing both their errour is condemned that take away the use of all vowes from Christians and their superstition that vow not as they ought Iacob 1. directeth his vowes to God the papists vow unto Saints 2. He voweth to testifie his thankfulnesse they vow to merit 3. He voweth such things as were in his power as to pay tithe they such things as are beyond their reach as single life where the gift is not 4. Iacob voweth such things as God commanded they vow things of their owne inventing as to goe in pilgrimage to fast with bread and water to garnish Idols and such like concerning the which we may say with the Prophet who required this at your hands Isay 1. â—2 Calvin 5. Doct. Signes called by the names of the things Vers. 22. THis stone shall be the house of God This stone was not Gods house but a monument or signe of the place of Gods worship for there Iacob to fulfill this vow afterward at his returne built an Altar to God Gen. 35.7 Thus by a metonymie that which is proper to the thing is given to the signe in which sense the bread in the Eucharist is called the body of Christ Marlâ—r 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. How the Angels are reporters of our prayers unto God and yet no mediators Vers. 12. LOe the Angels of God ascended and descended upon it Hence Pererius would gather that the Angels descended from heaven to reveale unto us the counsels of God and to execute his will so their office is by ascending to report unto God our prayers vowes and necessities in Gen. 25. numer 23. We grant that the Angels doe report unto God the affaires of the world and the acts and gests of men and so their supplications in generall but this they doe as messengers not as mediators The Prophet Zachary sheweth a distinct office of the Angelicall spirits and Jesus Christ there called the Angell of the Lord they returne this answer to Christ Wâ—e have gone thorow the world and behold all the world sitteth still and is at rest But the Angell of the Lord Christ the Mediator of his Church steppeth forth and prayeth O Lord of hosts how long wilt thou be unmercifull to Ierusalem Zach. 1.12 So then though the Angels be witnesses of our devotion and beholders of our teares and plaints they have no office of mediation neither have we any warrant to pray unto them 2. Confut. Against the Platonists that make three kinds of providence Vers. 12. THere stood a ladder upon the earth and the top reached to heaven Gods providence then descendeth from heaven to earth contrary to the opinion of the Platonists noted by Gregor Nyssen lib. 8. de provident cap. 3. who make three kinds of providence the first of God in taking care onely for things celestiall and spirituall and the generall causes of other things in the world the second they
that the Septuag translated the word monim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 money which by the Scribes was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the addition of one letter ex Mercer 5. Wherefore I rather thinke that here a certaine number is taken for an uncertaine that neither lesse than ten times Iacob was deceived nor yet just so many times but that he was very often beguiled at Labans hand as the Lord saith That the Israelites had tempted him ten times Num. 14.22 and Iob complaineth of his friends that they had ten times reproved him Iob 19.2 that is often Mercer QUEST II. Whence Iacob had his first particoloured goats that he saw in a dreame Vers. 12. SEe all the he goats leaping upon the she goats that are particoloured c. That are particoloured must be referred to the he goats not to the females because gnacâ—dim is of the masculine gender this difference is well observed by the Greeke and Latine translators Iun. Mercer and therefore our English translations are herein faulty that apply it to the she goats But here the question is from whence Iacob had these particoloured goats that leaped upon the females 1. Neither had Iacob these particoloured by miracle as the Hebrewes affirme that an Angell brought them from Labans flocke 2. Neither did Iacob borrow them of other shepherds for that had beene a fraud 3. Neither did he put his owne particoloured after they were increased to Labans white cattell for then he needed not to have used the device of the rods and beside it had beene a fraud 4. Nor yet are they called particoloured because they so appeared in the water while they leaped upon the ewes by reason of the pide and straked rods that were put into the gutters 5 Nor yet are they so named in respect of the issue and effect because they had particoloured lambs as if the rams that leaped the sheepe had beene of that colour as Mercer 6. But this vision is not to be referred to the beginning of this particoloured breed but at once sheweth to Iacob the great increase of them like to be that he should have particoloured both male and female of his owne in such abundance that they should ingender among themselves and grow into flocks QUEST III. Whether it were an Angell that spake unto Iacob in Bethel Vers. 13. I Am the God of Bethel c. 1. These two visions though reported together to Iacobs wives yet were not shewed at once to Iacob but at sundry times the one concerning the particoloured cattell 6. yeares before but the other for his returne in the end of the 6. yeare immediately before Iacobs departure from Laban vers 3. Mercer 2. This Angell was not any ministring Spirit which spake in the name of God as some thinke Mer. 3. But it was Christ himselfe for here hee is called the God of Bethel and in that vision beside the Angels ascending and descending the Lord himselfe stood at the top of the ladder who spake to Iacob Christ Jesus then was the great Angell of Gods presence that appeared before to Iacob in Bethel and now againe speaketh to him in vision QUEST IV. Why Rachel is set before Leah and speaketh first Vers. 14. THen answered Rachel and Leah 1. Rachel is named before Leah as before vers 4. because she was Iacobs principall wife the chiefe matron of the house Leah was thrust upon him undesired for this cause afterward in the forme of blessing which they used toward Ruth Rachel is preferred before Leah even by the Bethlemites that came of Iudah of Leah Ruth 4.11 2. Hebrewes note this as a presumptuous part in Rachel to speak before her elder sister and therefore they say she died first but the truth is the singular number is here used for the plurall and this answer though it might be made by Rachel was with the consent of both 3. In that they say All the riches which God hath taken c. is ours and our childrens they doe somewhat obscure Gods blessing as though God had given them but their due in as much as they being Labans daughters together with their children had interest in his goods Calvin Mercer QUEST V. Of the reasons that made Iacobs wives willing to depart Vers. 14. HAve we any more portion c. Iacobs wives use foure reasons of their willingnesse to depart three domesticall and one divine 1. Because they looked now for no more portion in their fathers house than that which they had gotten they had no reason to stay any longer they say not as some read Have we not yet any portion c. for they had a great part by Gods providence out of their fathers substance as they confesse vers 16. 2. He hath sold us he hath beene unkind to us setting us forth with no dowry but selling us for 14. yeares service and making againe and advantage thereof to himselfe 3. They say Should he still eat up our money that is should we remaine here still and suffer him to devoure our substance some doe otherwise read And hath eaten up our money referring it to the time past that whereas he had sold them for Iacobs service the price or money that is Iacobs labour he took to himselfe Mercer But the other reading is better which the particle gam etiam also doth imply should hee yet or still devoure c. 4. The divine reason which they use is from the Commandement of God vers 16. Whatsoever God hath said unto thee doe it QUEST VI. What the teraphim were which Rachel stole from Laban Vers. 19. RAchel stole her fathers idols the word is teraphim 1. Some by these teraphim understand the Priestly ornaments and implements that belong to sacrificing because Ose 3.4 the Prophet saith the children of Israel shall remaine a long time without Ephod and Teraphim Hieron epist. 113. ad Marcel But in this place the Prophet sheweth that the children shall bee without any forme of Church or common-wealth even such as when it was deformed with teraphim worship of idols Iun. 2. Some thinke that the teraphim were other pictures and resemblances than of men as Aquilas translateth them morphomata figures shapes but that teraphim had an humane shape appeareth 1 Sam. 19. where Michâ—l put an image in the bed in stead of David 3. Some thinke that the teraphim was made of the head of the first borne child which was embawmed and so kept from the which by the working of the devill they received answers Lyran. But if teraphim had beene such a thing it is not like Rachel would have stollen it away 4. Some thinke that they were certaine images which they consecrated for divination from whence they received answers R. Kimhi and they did represent the head of a man made of some kind of metall such a head Albertus Magnus had which Thomas Aquinas his scholler brake Tostat. and hereupon they derive the word from the root raphaph which signifieth remisse weake
in multeribus lethalem that yawning in travaile to women is morâ—all 2. The Hebrewes thinke that Rachel being wearied in her journey came before her time but it is not like that Iacob would have hastened his journey if his dearest wife had beene so neare her time 3. Neither hath it any ground that God punished Iacob with the death of Deborah and Rachel for the slaughter of the Sichemites Mercer 4. Ruperius in that Deborahs death and Rachels is expressed Rebâ—ckaes and Leahs death concealed thereby resembleth the â—ynagogue of the iewes which he would have prefigured by Deborah and Rachel for so their Synagogue did die and fall away the church of the Gentiles revived and increased But such allegories doe not much perswade having no warrant or ground in Scripture QUEST XVI Of the names Ephratha and Bethlem why and by whom they tooke beginning Vers. 19. EPhrath which is Bethlem 1. Some thinke that this place was called Ephratha of Calebâ— wife Ephrata 1 Chron. 2.9 which Caleb was sonne of Hezron and went downe with Iacob into Egypt and afterwards it was called Bethlem that is the house of bread after the famine in Elimelech and Ruths time of the abundance of corne R. Salomon Lyran. 2. Tostatus misliketh this opinion because this Caleb that went downe into Egypt must be 215. yeare old and more if he survived to returne with the Israelites into the Land of Canaan at which time it is like Ephrata tooke the name and beside if the name Bethlem were given in Elimelechs time how commeth it to be used by Moses so long before But these reasons may be easily answered for the name Ephrata might be given by the second Caleb after his grandfathers name and divers names are inserted into this history not knowne in Moses time as the name Dan Gen. 14.14 which were added by way of explanation by those Prophets directed by the spirit of God which disposed the Scripture into order Perer. 3. But it is more likely that this place had both these names of the fruitfulnesse of the ground for so Ephrath is derived of Pharah which signifieth to fructifie and it was afterward called Bethlem the house of bread Mercer but by whom these names and when they were imposed is uncertaine QUEST XVII Of the tower of Ader where Iacob pitched his tents Vers. 21. ISrael c. pitched his tent beyond the tower of Ader or of the flocks 1. The Hebrewes in this place doe hold that the temple was afterward built because the Prophet calleth Sion the tower of the flock Micah 4.7 but that cannot be for this tower where Iacob pitched was not far from Bethlem about a mile Muscul. but Ierusalem was further off Mercer yet this name was given to Sion because the people assembled thither in flocks or because of the flocks of sheepe thither brought to be sacrificed Perer. 2. This tower was made for the safegard of the shepherds in that country that used to watch their flocks by night and Hierome well observeth this to be a type and prophecie of those shepherds which in this very place watched their flocks at the birth of Christ where afterward Helena for a memoriall of the apparition of the Angels unto them builded a temple Perer. Luther QUEST XVIII Of the incest of Ruben with Bilha Vers. 22. RVben went and lay with Bilha his fathers concubine c. 1. The Hebrewes to excuse the sinnes of their fathers here imagine that Ruben did nor commit incest with Bilha but only cast out her bed out of Rachels tabernacle where Iacob had placed it after Rachels death whereas the text is evident that he slept with Bilha In like manner they would excuse the offence of Elie his sons that they did not lie with the women at the gates of the temple but onely deferred their businesse and so kept them longer from their husbands contrary to the evidence of the history 1 Sam. 2.22 2. Iacob though he might have used the sword in this case yet leaveth the punishment to God but for this sinne of defiling his fathers bed Ruben lost his birthright which was given to Ioseph in respect of his double portion the principality to Iudah 1 Chron. 5.1 3. This was a very great sinne to commit uncleannesse with his fathers concubine which was as his wife such fornication as was not once named among the Gentiles as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 5.1 for Antiochus the sonne of Seleucus being in love with Stratonice his mother in law yet for shame concealed it and fell into a most grievous disease Hippolitus is famous in the tragedie for resisting the unlawfull lust of Phaedra his mother in law 4. Some thinke that after this time Iacob did refraine the company of his wives but that is uncertaine Mercer It is most like that he after this accompanied not with Bilha as David served his concubines which Absolom went in unto 2 Sam. 20.3 QUEST XIX Of the genealogie of the Patriarkes wherefore it is here set downe Vers. 26. THese are the sonnes of Iacob which were borne him in Mesopotamia c. 1. Moses setteth here downe together the number of Iacobs sonnes 1. Because after this he had no more sonnes borne 2. As also Ruben is counted among them to shew that although he had fallen into this grievous sin yet the Lord vouchsafed to count him among the Patriarkes 3. As also to distinguish betweene Iacob and Esaus progenie which Moses prosecuteth in the new chapter Mercer Perer. 2. Dinah is not rehearsed among them because she made no tribe Mercer Neither useth the Scripture to set downe the genealogie of women Perer. 3. The word is put in the singular number which was borne for the plurall not for any such mystery as the Hebrewes note to shew that they were all begotten by one man or to shadow the birth of the Messiah but it is a property of the Hebrew speech to use the singular for the plurall 4. All these are said to be born in Mesopotamia whereas Benjamin was born in Canaan as Chrysostome thinketh for Benjamin was borne ten yeares after Iacob departed from Mesopotamia but here by a synechdoche according to the use of the Scripture that is affirmed of all which agreed to the most Mercer Perer. So Iohn 20.24 Thomas is called one of the twelve there being but eleven Iudas having hanged himselfe and so S. Marke calleth them the eleven Marke 16.14 QUEST XX. At what time Iacob came to Isaack his father Vers. 27. THen Iacob came to Isaack his father 1. Although now at the length ten yeares after Iacobs returne into Canaan hee came first to Isaack with his whole family yet it is not unlike but that Iacob went often over to see his father they dwelling not farre asunder Mercer 2. Mention is not made of Rebecca who is supposed at this time to have beene dead which is thought also to be the cause of Isaacks being in Hebron whom Iacob at his departure left
of the time as they imagine as though marriage were a pollution either of time place or person 6. Places of exhortation and morall use 1. Morall To cleanse our selves when we come before God Vers. 14. HE changed his raiment and came to Pharaoh As Ioseph changed his outward raiment and put off his filthy clothes when he came into the Kings presence so ought wee to cleanse our hearts and sanctifie our soules when we appeare before the Lord Muscul. as the Preachet saith Take heed to thy foot when thou entrest into the house of God Eccles. 4.17 2. Morall Not to glory in our gifts but to referre all to the praise of God Vers. 16. WIthout me God shall answer Ioseph doth extenuate his owne gifts detracteth from himselfe and giveth the glory to God so wee should not rejoyce in any thing that is in us but acknowledge every good gift to be from God for as the Apostle saith Neither he that planteth nor he that watereth is any thing but God that giveth increase 1 Cor. 3.7 3. Morall Gods speciall care in providing for his Church Vers. 16. GOd shall answer for the wealth of Pharaoh Though God had great mercy upon Pharaoh and all Egypt in forewarning them of the great famine to come that they might aforehand make provision for it yet Gods speciall care and providence watched over his Church in Iacobs house that they might be preserved as Ioseph himselfe acknowledgeth God sent me before you to preserve your posterity in this land Gen. 45.7 4. Morall Wisdome not to be despised though cloathed in rags Vers. 15. I Have heard say of thee thou canst interpret c. Though the Butler before making mention of Ioseph for feare rather than of love lest by others it might have beene made knowne to Pharaoh how Ioseph had expounded his dreame in prison did in tearmes disgrace him saying he was a young man a childe in a manner an Hebrew who were an abomination to the Egyptians and a servant or bondslave vers 12. yet Pharaoh disdaineth not to take counsell of him we should not then despise wisedome though cloathed with rags not contemne the graces of Gods spirit in poore and base men to the world Mercer Muscul. Thus saith the Prophet There was found a poore and wise man and he delivered the City by his wisdome Eccles. 9.15 5. Morall Famine is unsatiable Vers. 10. THe leane kine did eat up the seven fat kine c. and it could not be knowne that they had eaten them When God sendeth the judgement of famine there is not onely an outward want but there is also a greedy appetite within that cannot be satisfied and that which is eaten is not seene in the body as these seven leane kine were never the fuller nor fatter though they had swallowed up the seven fat and well liking kine so the Prophet saith He shall snatch at the right hand and be hungry and eat at the left hand and not be satisfied Isay 9.20 This judgement God sendeth upon men for abusing of plentie and he which eateth and drinketh of wantonnesse more than sufficeth is justly punished with a greedie and doggish appetite that never can have enough 6. Morall Men of gifts must be called to publike office Vers. 38. CAn we finde such a man as this in whom is the spirit of God Pharaoh thinketh Ioseph a fit man for government because he was indued with the graces of the Spirit So none should bee called to place of rule and oversight in Church or Common-wealth but such as are thereunto fitted and furnished with convenient and sufficient gifts as Numb 11.17 those Elders which were chosen to beare part of the burden with Moses received also part of his spirit 7. Morall The Kings office to provide for the want of his people Vers. 55. THe people cried to Pharaoh and he said goe to Ioseph Although the people knew that the King had deputed Ioseph the chiefe officer for corne yet they make their complaint to the King It then belongeth to the King to provide for the necessities of the people and to see that his officers doe their duty so the woman in time of famine cried to the King Helpe my Lord O King 1 King 6.27 CHAP. XLII 1. The Method or Argument of the Chapter IN this chapter first is set downe the comming of Israels sonnes into Egypt wherefore they came to buy food vers 1 2. which of them came all but Benjamin and why left he should die by the way vers 4. Secondly the manner of their entertainment in Egypt is described from vers 7. to v. 26. 1. Ioseph dealeth roughly with them in charging them to be spies vers 7. to 16. then in detaining Simeon and binding him before their eies till such time as they brought Benjamin vers 20. to 24. other interlocutory speeches are inserted of the Patriarkes among themselves in confessing their sinne toward their brother vers 21. 2. Ioseph sheweth this kindnesse to his brethren in causing their money to bee put in their sacks mouth vers 25. Thirdly their returne home is expressed 1. What happened in the way as they went that in opening of their sacks they found their money 2. The report and narration to Iacob of their manner of handling and entertainement in Egypt 3. The refusall of Iacob to send his sonne Benjamin with them although Ruben earnestly perswaded him 2. The divers readings v. 1. Why are yeâ— negligent or sloathfull H.S.C. why gaze yee or looke ye one upon another B.G.T.P. heb v. 2. Buy us necessaries from thence H. buy us food S.G. corne B. buy us from thence T.C.P. heb v. 4. 36. Lest he take hurt by the way H. be sicke by the way S. die in the journey C.G. lest destruction befall him B. T. P. asâ—n destruction death v. 7. He considered what he should say unto them C. he made himselfe strange unto them caeâ—er v. 9. Ye are come to consider the passages of the land S. to see the weakenesse or nakednesse caeter v. 11. We are peaceable men and intend no evill H. we are peaceable and no spies S. we meane truly and are no spies B. G. we are true or honest men and no spies C.T.P. heb cun right true v. 16. By the health of Pharaoh H.S. by the life of Pharaoh C.B. G. so may Pharaoh live T. P. heb Yee shall be carried away S. ye shall be in bonds caet v. 19. Carry the corne which ye have bought for your houses H. carrie the corne which ye have bought S. carrie the corne which faileth in your houses C. carry corne for the famine of your houses G. to put away the famine of your houses B. P. carry corne the famine whereof is in your houses T. carry corne of the famine of your houses· heb v. 25. To fill their sacks with corne H.B.G. to fill their vessels or instruments with corne C. T.P. calah a vessell v. 30. Put us
delivered to the Egyptians the grounds of these artes who yet is more likely to have beene the inventor of husbandrie and other such profitable trades than of the mysticall arts and sciences 4. Therefore the more probable opinion is that by whomsoever the first seeds of this mysticall profession were sowne among the Egyptians it is not to be doubted but that by Iacobs comming downe but especially Iosephs long time of government their knowledge was much increased the scripture bearing witnesse hereunto Psalm 105.21 He made him Lord over his house to teach his Senators wisdome and by the cohabiting of the Hebrewes 215. yeeres in Egypt the Egyptians might profit more in the profession of wisdome which that superstitious people might with their gentilismes and superstitions intermingled change and alter And for the truth hereof that the Egyptians learned many things of the Hebrewes this may serve as an evidence that in Herodotus Diodorus Siculus and other waiting of the ancient Egyptians many things are found having some conformity with the doctrine law and usages of the Hebrewes ex Pererio QUEST XVI Why it pleased God that Moses should be instructed in the Egyptian learning NOw it pleased God that Moses should be thus trained up in the wisdome of the Egyptians and have a courtly bringing up that by this meanes he might bee instructed in the government of the Common-wealth and be prepared for that publike function which he should afterward be called unto So David was taken from the flocke and brought up in Saules court to learne the discipline of the Kingdome Though it pleased God to use the ordinary meanes for Moses instruction yet he alwayes doth not so and especially in the new Testament the Apostles were extraordinarily inspired being in humane learning altogether unexpert for there was more abundance of spirit and grace in the new Testament under Christ than in the old under the Law Simler 2. Beside Moses by this meanes became famous and got himselfe great authoritie among the Egyptians that there might be greater respect had unto his message afterward and being fully instructed in the knowledge of the Egyptians he was the better able to discerne the errors and superstitions both to convince the Egyptians and to containe the Israelites in the obedience and profession of the truth ex Perer. QUEST XVII Why Moses had this name given him Vers. 10. SHe called his name Moses 1. Concerning the imposition of the name of Moses neither is the opinion of Philo and Clemens Alexandrinus probable that it is an Egyptian name derived of Mos which signifieth water and Iosephus will have it compounded of Mos water and Ises saved for the etymon of the name is not from the water but because he was drawne and taken out as the reason is here expressed 2. Neither yet is it like that Moses was in the Egyptian language called Mueves as Iun. out of Diodâ—r Siculus or Movion as Pererius out of Aben Ezra being of the same signification which Moses is in Hebrew that is drawne out for then it is like the Egyptian name would have beene expressed as Iosephs is Gen. 41.45 and Daniels Chalde name Dan. 4.5 3. Nor yet is it probable that Pharaohs daughter having learned the Hebrew tongue of her maids did give an Hebrew name unto Moses as Eugubinus Lippom. Thostatus for seeing the Hebrewes were an abomination to the Egyptianâ— it may be thought also that they abhorred their names 4. Therefore I rather incline to thinke with Simlerus and Osiander that this word whereof Moses is derived is Massah to draw out as it is taken Psal. 18.17 Thou hast drawne me out of the waters might be common both to the Hebrewes and to the Egyptians as some words are common to divers languages both alike in sound and signification or it might be translated or transposed out of the Egyptian tongue into the Hebrew 5. But as for other names that Moses should be called by as at his circumcision Ioachim which signifieth established and afterward Melchi my King as Clemens Alexandrinus writeth wee reject them as having no ground in Scripture seeing hee is perpetually called by the name of Moses which name was by Gods providence imposed wherein is set forth the principall part of his calling to draw the Israelites out of the waters and troubles of Egypt and to lead them through the red sea and so indeed historically to draw them out of the waters QUEST XVIII Of Moses visiting his brethren Vers. 11. ANd in those daies when Moses was growne hee went forth to his brethren 1. Very little mention is made of Moses time spent in the court till he was fortie yeere old for then as S. Stephâ—n sheweth Act. 7. he began to visit his brethren like as little is expressed of the doings of Christ while he lived privately till he was thirtie yeere old Pellican 2. Iosephus writeth how in this time he warred against the Ethiopians and while he besieged Saba the King of Ethiopia his daughter fell in love with him and was married to him whom the author of historia scholast saith was Zipporah But the Scripture sheweth that she was the daughter of the Prince of Midian Perer. 3. He was now growne not onely in stature of body but in the grace and gifts of the spirit Pellican And as it seemeth having neglected and forgotten his brethren hitherto being now especially stirred up called of God he goeth to visit his brethren he did it not onely of a naturall instinct as Hilary seemeth to write 4. And this the Apostle sheweth to have beene an excellent worke of faith For 1. he refuseth to be called Pharaohs daughters sonne He renounceth his courtly life and he pleasures of Egypt 3. He preferreth the afflictions of Gods people before the pleasures of Egypt 4. He looketh unto the reward Heb. 11. Ferus But if it be asked why Ioseph did not so likewise to leave the court as Moses did I answere first that some thinke that Ioseph did in his old age leave Pharaohs court and went and dwelt with his brethren in the land of Goshen beside the case betweene Ioseph and Moses is farre divers for in Iosephs time Pharaoh was a friend to Israel now an enemy then the people were in happy case now the state is miserable Iosephs calling was to be a feeder of Israel in Egypt Moses to bring them out of Egypt Simler QUEST XIX Whether it were lawfull for Moses to kill the Egyptian Vers. 12. WHen he saw no man hee slew the Egyptian Concerning the fact of Moses in killing the Egyptian we are farre off from accusing or blaming the same which was at the first the opinion of Augustine who thus writeth against Faustus Consulta aeterna lege reperio non debuisse hominem à Mose qui nullam ordinariam potestatem habebat quamvis improbium ocâ—idi I finde in the eternall law that Moses having no ordinary power ought not to have killed no not a wicked man
originall NOw whereas after the 22. verse the Septuagint and the Latine translator doe insert a whole verse of the birth of Eleazar with the reason of the imposition of his name all which is not in the Hebrew in this place but is transposed hither from the 18. chap. of Exodus vers 4. Bellarmine would therefore make us beleeve that herein the Latine text is perfecter than the Hebrew because mention is made onely of one of Moses sonnes whereas he had two lib. 2. de va Dei cap. 2. Contr. 1. It followeth not because some thing is omitted in one place to be inserted in another that therefore the Hebrew text is defective as S. Marke making mention of one blind man chap. 10.46 and S. Luke likewise chap. 18.36 whereas S. Matthew speaketh of two blind men chap. 20.29 are not therefore defective So neither is the Hebrew here thought to be wanting expressing onely one of Moses sons seeing the other is supplied chap. 18.2 And if the Septuagint is to be justified here then let them be borne out also for adding five more of Iosephs posteritie Machor Gilead of Manasseh and Suâ—â—am and Taam and Edom of Ephraim Genes 46. which are not mentioned in the Hebrew as not then borne but borrowed from the 26. of Numb and 1 Chron. 7. Likewise Exod. 6.19 the Latine and Septuagint put unto Moses and Aaron Miriam which is not in the Hebrew this rather sheweth great boldnesse 〈◊〉 thâ—se translators to adde that which the spirit of God passeth over in silence 5. Cont. Prayers are not meritorious Vers. 24. THen God heard their mâ—ne and God remembred his covenant The Israelites prayers are heard not for any worthinesse or merit of their sorrow but the Lord for his promise sake the foundation whereof is Christ heareth their complaint and hath respect unto them Simler Borrh. And that our prayers are not meritorious but heard in mercie Salomon sheweth Then heaâ—s thou in heaven and be mercifull to the sinne of thy people 1 King 8.24 6. Places of morall use 1. Mor. Rich and great men should have compassion on the necessities of their poore brethren Vers. 11. HE went forth to his brethren to looke on their burdens Moses though himselfe lived in all ease and courtly pleasure yet could not so content himselfe but goeth to visit his afflicted brethren and is touched in compassion towards them as Queene Hester also was moved with pity toward her people which teacheth us that rich and mighty men that are in high and wealthy place should submit themselves to take knowledge of the necessities and wants of their poore brethren therefore the Prophet reproveth the rich men of Israel that dranke wine in bowles and lived at ease but no man was sory for the affliction of Ioseph Ferus 2. Mor. Friendly admonition is not to be despised Vers. 14. WHo made thee a man of authoritie Moses here for his friendly admonition is recompensed with scornefull and disdainfull words which is the property of naturall and carnall men to repay them with evill which carefully watch over them by wholesome admonitions for the good of their soule Simler But the Wise man saith The eare that hearkeneth to the correction of life shall lodge among the wise but he that refuseth instruction despiseth his owne soule 3. Mor. Godly names to be given unto children Vers. 22. WHose name he called Gershom Moses giveth unto his sonne a name that might put both himselfe and his sonne also when he came to yeeres of discretion in minde of their state and condition that they were but pilgrimes and strangers here So did the Fathers use to give names unto their children of good signification and godly edifying that fond use therefore is to bee reproved among Christians that give names unto their children borrowed and taken from the Gentiles and such as have no good signification or which they understand not Pellican 4. Mor. Patience is necessarie in prayer Vers. 24. THen God heard their mone Yet it was forty yeeres before the Lord sent them deliverance we must not then thinke that our prayers are neglected of God if presently we see not the effect thereof but we must waite the Lords leisure and expect with patience till it bee his pleasure to performe our prayers and grant our requests Ferus S. Paul prayed thrice that is often that the pricke of the flesh the messenger of Satan might be taken from him yet was it not but the Lord gave him his sufficient grace with patience and strength to endure that combat 2. Cor. 12. 5. Mor. In affliction we must flie unto prayer ANd in that the people cried unto God in this their distresse they rebelled not nor sought to deliver themselves by their owne arme or strength it teacheth us that in all our afflictions wee should depend upon God and betake our selves unto prayer Pellic. as Saint Iames saith If any be afflicted let him pray Iam. 5.13 CHAP. III. 1. The method and parts THe generall preparation of the Instrument of this great deliverance is set forth in the Chapter going before in his preservation education persecution Now followeth the more speciall preparation in the vocation of Moses in this third Chapter and his confirmation chap. 4. In this Chapter is set forth first the preparation to his vocation to vers 7. Secondly the vocation it selfe to vers 22. The preparation consisteth partly in a vision which Moses saw both in what place vers 1. what vision it was vers 2. how Moses behaved himselfe vers 3. partly in the voice of God which Moses feared wherein Moses is charged what he should doe vers 4.5 and the Lord proclaimeth who he is vers 6. The vocation of Moses is either a generall charge or commandement to goe unto Egypt where 1. Moses office is injoyned him of God vers 10. with the occasion thereof the afflictions of the people vers 7. the twofold end thereof to deliver them out of Egypt and to bring them into the good land of Canaan vers 8.2 Moses excuseth himselfe 1. By his infirmity where the Lord satisfieth him by that present signe and assuring him of the future event that they should serve him in that mount vers 11 12. 2. By pretending the curiosity of the people in inquiring after his name that sent him verse the 13. where the Lord also satisfieth him by shewing his name vers 14 15. Beside the generall charge followeth a particular direction what course hee shall take to vers 19. and what effect it shall have For the first there is prescribed whom hee shall joyne with him the Elders of Israel vers 16. what he shall say unto them vers 17. what they shall doe goe unto Pharaoh vers 18. The effects or events are foure 1. Pharaoh shall refuse to let them goe vers 19. 2. The Lord will worke signes and wonders 3. Then he will send them out vers 20. 4. They shall goe out richly with ornaments and jewels vers
Neither was this sinne of Moses veniall that is a light and small sinne for such sinnes the Lord passeth over in his children but here he was angry with Moses If the Lord should bee angry with every small sinne and oversight of his children who should abide it 3. The forbearing of punishment sheweth not the smalnesse of the sinne but the greatnesse of Gods mercie 4. Cajetanes observation is false for the same phrase â—ichar aph Iehovah Iehovahs wrath was kindled is used upon occasion of great sinnes as when the people murmured Numb 11.3 and lusted for quailes vers 33. the same words are there put 4. This then may safely be held that although Moses at the first might in humility disable himselfe yet after God had given him satisfaction to all his doubts upon his foure severall refusals first for his owne insufficiencie and the greatnesse of the businesse Chap. 3.11 Secondly because they might inquire after Gods name Chap. 3.14 Thirdly he excuseth himselfe by the incredulity of the people Lastly by his owne imperfection of speech yet after all this to stand still upon his refusall sheweth no small infirmitie in Moses as it may appeare by the effect because God was angrie with him yet Gods anger is not such against his children as against the wicked for there he is angry and punisheth here he is angrie and rebuketh but withdraweth not his favour for immediatly the Lord concurreth with Moses desire and giveth him his brother to be his assistant Simler So that Gods anger here is as when the father is angrie with his child or one friend with another which notwithstanding is no breach of friendship QUEST XII Why Aaron is called the Levite Vers. 14. AAron thy brother the Levite 1. This is not added because the Priesthood should have belonged to Moses the Leviticall order to Aaron but that Moses was deprived of that honour for refusing his calling as Rabbi Salomon Pellican 2. But because there might bee other Aarons not of Levie this is expressed by way of distinction that Moses might know that the Lord did meane none other Aaron but his owne naturall brother of Levi Iun. Simler 3. And this might bee also a reason thereof because the Lord purposed to annex the Priesthood to Aaron and his posteritie Osiander QUEST XIII How Moses is said to be as God to Aaron Vers. 16. THou shalt bee to him in Gods stead This sheweth 1. that Moses should bee superior unto Aaron as his Prince as the Chalde Paraphrast and Aaron as his Chancelor Moses should give him direction from God what to speake Osiander 2. By this also Moses authority is signified by the which as in Gods place he ordained Aaron to be the high Priest Pellican 3. Likewise he is as God that is a wise counsellor and full of Gods spirit to whom Aaron should resort for counsell Vatab. Genevens 4. And as Aaron was Moses spokesman to the people so Moses should bee Aarons mouth to consult with God so the Septuagint and Latine read Thou shalt be for him in those things which appertaine to God 5. But Moses in another sense is said to bee Pharaohs God Exod. 7.1 not only to declare Gods will unto him but to execute Gods judgements upon him Genevens QUEST XIV Whether Moses did well being called of God in taking his leave of his father in law Vers. 18. THerefore Moses went and returned to Iethro 1. Some doe charge Moses here with an oversight that he presently dispatched not into Egypt but first tooke his leave of his father in law for Iacob went away without Labans privity and S. Paul saith that hee did not consult with flesh and bloud after he was called Galath 1. 2. Contra these examples are altogether unlike for Laban was unfriendly to Iacob and he feared he would worke him some displeasure and Iacob was then at his owne hand and kept sheepe for himselfe and beside he had in a manner sold over his daughters to Iacob and used them as strangers But Moses had a kinde and loving father in law he then kept his sheepe as hee covenanted and he entertained Zipporah still as his daughter and therefore Moses could not in humanity but take his leave of him 3. S. Paul consulted not with any for the approbation of his calling being therefore fully assured neither doth Moses conferre with Iethro to any such end but only to performe the office of humanity Simler 4. Wherefore the calling of God doth not take away civill duties toward parents and kindred saving where they are an impediment to our calling in which case wee are rather to forsake father and mother than to disobey God 5. Moses therefore taketh his leave of Iethro both because he purposed to carry away his wife and children and for that he had before covenanted to stay with Iethro chap. 2.21 Ferus QUEST XV. Why Moses concealed from Iethro the principall end of his going LEt me goe and returne to my brethren 1. Moses concealeth from his father in law the principall cause of his journey which was the calling of God both for that he sought Gods glorie and not his owne Ferus lest he should have seemed to boast of his visions Osiander and he doth keepe it secret of modesty least he might be thought to be a vaine man in telling such incredible things 2. In saying he went to see whether his brethren were alive and to visite them he dissembleth not though he went to doe more and it is evident by taking his wife and children with him that Iethro knew hee purposed not only to visite them but to stay there so that it seemeth likely that Moses imparted so much of his purpose concerning his stay there Simler and in generall also that he went for the comfort and profit of his brethren as Iosepus but in particular he kept secret the end of his going 3. Iethro being a good man would not hinder so charitable a worke though he had speciall use of him Ferus especially having such experience of the fidelitie and wisedome of Moses that without great cause he knew he would not desire to depart from him Simler QUEST XVI Whether God spake to Moses in Midian beside that vision in Horeb. Vers. 19. ANd Iehovah said to Moses 1. Some thinke that this sentence is transposed and that God thus spake unto Moses before he had moved his father in law Genevens Pellican But although such transposing of the order be usuall in Scriptures yet heere it need not to bee admitted for God might often appeare to Moses to confirme him Iun. and this was said in Midian the other vision was in Horeb the distinction of the place sheweth them to be divers apparitions Simler 2. The Lord to encourage Moses taketh away all doubts and telleth him that all which sought his life as well Pharaoh as the pursuers of the bloud of the slaine were dead Iun. And thus much Moses might impart also to his father
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 enchanters R. Levi taketh them to be those which by naturall meanes seeme to doe strange things while their craft is not perceived as here they seeme to make serpents of rods R. Saadias would derive it of chor and atam which signifieth an hole and secret because they did hide in secret holes and places as in graves those whom they consulted with and which gave answer unto them but this seemeth to be curious The fourth word is lahate of lahat which signifieth fire or the blade of a sword as Gen. 3.24 because Magicians use not onely words to enchant with but other instruments Aben Ezra But their enchantments are rather so called because they deceive men making them to take one thing for another as the fight is easily deceived in shaking of a bright sword Borrh. QUEST VIII Of the divers kindes of magick BEsides these here named there were other kindes of Magick as Plinie rehearseth divers as how they divined by water by the aire by the starres by basons shadowes talke with the dead lib. 30. c. 11.2 Augustine out of Proclus and Porphyrius sheweth that they made two kindes of Magick the one was thourgia which by certaine sacrifices and a fained purity of the body and by other rites did invocate as they thought the good spirits the other was called goetia because they used mourning in invocating of spirits and Necromantia because they consulted with the dead 3. Suidas maketh three sorts Mâ—gia art Magicke which was by invocating of the spirits for the effecting of some good worke as they were made to beleeve Goetia which by mourning called upon the spirits of the dead Pharmacia when they used or applied any venomous or poysoned thing Ex Perer. 4. But to know the divers devilish devices which Magicians used we can have no better direction than from the Scripture it selfe Deut. 18.10 Where beside these two kindes before rehearsed of jidgeni the wisard and casheph the Jugler or deceiver there are six more magicall practices set downe The first is Kasam the diviner 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Septuagint such as tooke upon them to tell of things which were lost and to declare hid matters and things to come such as divined by visions as Micah 3.6 The next is meghonen an observer of times Planetarius a Planetary such as by the aspect of the starres moving of the cloudes and by such like tooke upon them to prognosticate not of naturall things but of civill and humane affaires so is the word used Isai. 2.6 They are Southsayers as the Philistims and what the Philistims were we may read 1. Sam. 6. who by the going of the cart and by the way it tooke did take upon them to finde out the author of the plagues that were sent upon them the Septuagint reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such as observe words and use spels The third is nachash an Augur or Conjecturer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such as by the flying of birds or such like doe make conjectures as they that count the crossing of a hare the way ominous and such like The fourth is casheph the plurall whereof is cashphim deceivers touched before The fift is chober chaber the Inchanter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Septuagint that useth inchantment as it is expounded by another word Psal. 58.6 lachash which signifieth to mutter or whisper such as take upon them to charme Serpents and adjure Devils and to doe great cures by hanging inchanted things about the necke or such like the word chabar signifieth to joyne because such have a league and conjunction with evill spirits The sixt is shoel obh that asketh of familiars 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ventriloquus Septuagint that give answers as though a spirit or familiar spake within them for obh signifieth a bottle or the belly swelling and puffed up and ready to brast as Iob. 22.20 The seventh is jâ—dgoni the Wisard spoken of before The eight is doresh el hamethim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that inquireth of the dead such as make men beleeve they can raise up the dead to consult with them whereas it is the Devill in their likenesse as the witch of Endor brought up the Devill in likenesse of Samuel 1. Sam. 28. QUEST IX Of the first author and inventor of art Magick Vers. 11. THese Charmers of Egypt Though Egypt was much given to this devilish invention of Magicke yet neither were they the first founders nor the onely professors of it 1. Most Writers doe make Zoroastres of Persia the author of it as Plinie and Diogenes Laertius Iustinus Plinie writeth of him that hee only of all men that ever were laughed the same day hee was borne and his braine so moved up and downe that it would remove or put off the hand laid upon it which they say was a signe of his great and mysticall knowledge the author of the Scholasticall history saith that this Zoroastres was Ninus who wrote this art Magicke and the seven liberall Arts in fourteene pillars seven of brasse and seven of bricke to preserve them from the destruction of the world one by water the other by fire 2. Concerning the antiquity of Zoroastres hee was neither so ancient as some write that hee was 600. yeeres elder than Plato or five thousand yeeres before the battell of Troy as Hermippus as Laertius citeth him nor yet was he so late as Xantus Lydius maketh him to be but six hundred yeeres before Xerxes expedition into Greece For Zoroastres was in the time of Ninus when Abraham lived from whose birth to the first Olympiad are counted 1268. yeeres and the battell of Troy was 407. yeeres before the beginning of the Olympiades But Xerxes passage into Greece followeth in the 75. Olympiade and Plato his death in the 108 Olympiade by this it is evident that Zoroastres was neither so many yeeres before the first nor so few as the rest imagine 3. But Cassianus deriveth the first invention of Magicke from before the floud for whereas Adam having the knowledge of the celestiall bodies and elements taught the same unto Seth which kinde of knowledge continued uncorrupt in the righteous seed till they joyned in marriage with the posterity of Cain then they abused and prophaned the same to the finding out of superstitious and Magicall devices which wicked inventions they say were preserved by Cain and by him graven in certaine plates of mettall sic Cassianus collat 8. cap. 21. So these devilish practises continued along and were dispersed in the world they were rice in Canaan in Moses time as may appeare by the Lawes made against such in divers places but especially Deut. 18.10 And afterward about the time of the Trojane warre these Magicall studies were much followed as Homers fable of Circes sheweth Orpheus among the Thessalians and Osthanes that accompanied Xerxes in his warre against Greece were famous in this kind Pythagoras and after him Empedocles Democritus Plato seemed to make great account of
downe fire from heaven But how is it then called the fire of God if it were of Satans sending therefore the text it selfe is against that opinion some take it to bee called a fire of God that is a great and most vehement lightning as things of excellencie are so called as the wrestlings of God Gen. 30.8 and the mountaines of God Psal 36.7 Iunius But this sense in that place seemeth to be improper for as here the lightning is called the fire of God so Psal. 29. thunder is called the voice of God I thinke that it will not be said that here also it is so called because the thunder giveth a mighty voice for this is there beside expressed The voice of the Lord is mighty but there the reason is shewed why it is called the voice of the Lord because the God of glorie maketh it to thunder vers 3. Againe every where the Scripture maketh God the author of thunder and lightning and windes as Psal. 107.25 Hee commandeth and raiseth the stormie winde and Psal. 147.15 Hee sendeth forth his commandement upon the earth and his word runneth very swiftly he giveth snow like wooll Psal. 148.7 8. Praise the Lord c. fire and haile snow and stormy winde which execute his word they execute Gods word and commandement onely but if they might bee raised by the power of Satan then should they execute his word Further the Lord saith Iob. 38.25 Who hath divided the spoutes for the raine as the way for the lightning of the thunders and vers 28. the Lord is said to bee the father of raine and so consequently of the other meteors If the Devill can cause raine thunder lightning then he might be said to bee the father of it Hence it is that the people of God have used to pray unto him as the only author and giver of raine and weather as Samuel saith Is it not wheate harvest I will call unto the Lord and he shall send thunder and raine 1. Sam. 12.17 So Ambrose saith Cum pluvia expeteretur ab omnibus quidam dixit neomenia dabit eam c. When raine was desired of all one said the new Moone will bring raine although we were very greedy of raine yet I would not such assertions to bee true yea and I was much delighted that no raine was powred donec precibus ecclesiae datus manifestaret non de initiis lunae sperandum esse sed providentia misericordia creatoris untill it being at the prayers of the Church did manifestly shew that raine is not to be hoped for by the renewing of the Moone but by the providence and mercy of the Creator Some thinke that the fire which came upon Iobs flocke did not come downe from heaven but was otherwise kindled by Satan but that the Devill made as though it came from Heaven the more to terrific Iob when hee should see that even the heavens and God himselfe were set against him Of this opinion seemeth to bee the author of the Commentary upon Iob under Origens name Non de coelo cecidit ignis ille sed ita finxit nequissimus c. Non à Deo missus est sed tua iniquita â— miserrime omnium diabole succensus est That fire came not downe from heaven but so the wicked one fained it was not sent of God but kindled by thy wicked meanes O thou Devill of all most miserable And afterward hee sheweth that Satan cannot bring fire from heaven Dic ergo infoelix tunc super oves Iob ignem de coelo potuisti adducere cur non potuisti revocare illum ignem quem advocavit Helias Say then couldest thou O wretched one bring fire upon Iobs sheepe and why couldest thou not then keepe backe the fire which Helias called for upon the fifties for they were thy ministers and servants This authors judgement in this latter point wee willingly imbrace but his first conceit seemeth not to bee agreeable to the text which saith it was the fire of God then not kindled by Satan Neither yet is it to be thought that Satan had no hand in it but that it was wholly Gods worke for so God should be Satans Minister in serving his turne and not Satan his Wherefore my opinion is this that this tempest of fire and winde were in respect of the naturall generation of them of the working and sending of the Creator But Satan was Minister dejecti ignis the minister of the fire cast downe as Osiander saith not the author but the minister yet not Gods minister in the originall worke which proceeded of naturall causes but in the execution God caused the fire but Satan brought it upon Iobs flocke God raised the winde but Satan drave it upon the foure corners of the house for this we doubt not of but that thunder and lightning and winde being once raised that Satan hath power by Gods permission to carry and transport it from place to place if the winde blow one way he can turne it to another but of himselfe by his spirituall power I deny that he can raise windes and tempests where none are upon the reasons before alleaged And therefore we may hold that to bee a fable which Philostratus reporteth how Apollonius saw two tunnes among the Indians which being opened did send out the windes and being shut they were restrained So I conclude this place with that decree of the Councell Bracaâ—ens 1. c. 8. Si quis credit quòd diabolus tonitrua fulgura tempestates siccitates sua authoritate facit sicut Priscillianus docet anathema sit If any man beleeve that the Devill by his owne authority can make thunder lightning tempests drought as Priscillanus holdeth let him be accursed QUEST XV. Of the power of spirits in naturall workes NOw concerning the other actions of spirits which is called mediate they by applying tempering and qualifying naturall causes may bring forth strange effects for the vertues and properties of herbes plants precious stones mettals mâ—nerals are exactly knowne unto them and but in part unto us 1. As we see man by art by composing things together can effect rare and strange workes as is evident in the graffing and incision of trees in distilling of waters compounding of medicines so much more can spirits by aportioning and applying divers naturall causes together produce strange things 2. Againe many times the excellencie of the artificer or workeman addeth to the perfection of the worke beyond the vertue of the instrumenâ—â— as an axe serveth but to cut but the cunning workeman can therewith doe more than cut as frame a bed or table and such like so these spirituall powers by their great skill can by naturall instruments and meanes bring forth more excellent and strange works than their naturall force serveth unto because they are the instruments of Angels and spirits Sic Thom. Aqui. cont Gent. c. 103. 3. Augustine giveth instance of divers strange and admirable workes in nature as
hee doth thus collect the first plague of converting the waters into bloud continued seven dayes chap. 7.25 then upon the eight day came the frogs and the next day after chap. 8.9 which was the ninth they were taken away upon the tenth day the lice were sent upon the eleventh day the swarmes of noisome flies are threatned upon the next day being the twelfth they are sent and the morrow after they are taken away chap. 8.29 which was the 13. day upon the 14. the fifth plague of the murrane of cattell is threatned the morrow after it is sent chap. 9.6 which was the 15. day upon the 16. day the sixt plague of botches and sores followeth the 17. day the 7. plague of haile is threatned sent the next day chap. 9.18 which was the 18. day and taken away the next which was the 19. day on the 20. day the 8. plague of grashoppers is threatned sent the 21. day and removed the 22. day the three dayes following the thicke darknesse came chap. 10.22 the 23.24 and 25· dayes upon the 26. day Pharaoh expelled Moses from his presence and about midnight following the beginning of the 28. day the first borne were slaine So that from the first plague to the last there was not above a moneth the last plague then of the slaughter of the first borne falling upon the 14. day of Nisan the first moneth of the Hebrewes the first began about the middle of Adar the last moneth which answereth to our February as Nison doth unto March Pererius And that it is more likely that all these plagues came together in the space of one moneth rather than of twelve moneths it may thus appeare first because the plagues following one immediatly upon another without any pause or respite they were so much the more grievous and this was the strong hand of God whereby Pharaoh was constrained to let Israel goe chap. 6.1 Secondly the plagues were such as Egypt never saw nor felt before chap. 9.24 and 10.14 and if they had continued long the Egyptians could not have endured Thirdly whereas the Israelites spent full forty yeeres in the wildernesse Iosh. 5.6 and Mosâ—s was 80. yeere old chap. 7.7 before any of the plagues began and 120. yeere old in the end of the 40. yeeres travell in the wildernesse Deut. 34. much time could not bee spent in Egypt after the hand of God by the ministry of Moses began to worke upon them QUEST XXX Whether the good Angels or bad were the ministers of the Egyptian plagues COncerning the author of these plagues there is no question but that they came from God who thereby did most justly punish the Egyptians for the unjust vexation of his people for so the Lord saith He will smite Egypt with all his wonders chap. 3.20 But there ariseth a greater doubt who were the ministers of these plagues whether the good angels or evill 1. Genebrard thinketh because it is said Psalm 78.49 By the sending of evill Angels that the evill spirits were executioners of these plagues But Augustines reason is very strong against this opinion for in the two first plagues which were counterfeited by the Sorcerers it is evident that the evill Angels were doers by whom the Magicians wrought they certainly were not the ministers of the true plagues for then as he saith Angeli mali ex utraque parte consisterent the evill Angels should be of both sides hinc illos affligentes inde fallentes afflâ—cting the Egyptians on the side and deceiving them on the other If the evill Angels then were not ministers of the first plagues neither were they used in the rest and beside we have a more evident argument that when in the third plague the Sorcerers attempted to doe the like they could not the Lord inhibited and restrained the evill spirits that they should worke no longer by their ministers the Sorcerers If the Lord restrained their power then he loosed it not or used it 2. Wherefore they are called evill Angels not in respect of their office but of the effect because they were messengers and ministers of evill plagues Perer. 3. But I thinke with Iunius that it is not necessary here to understand Angels for those ministring spirits but the word malacâ— may here signifie messengers and is referred to Moses and Aaron that were the messengers and ministers of these plagues And this interpretation is confirmed by two reasons because in this historie it is directly expressed that most of the plagues were procured by Moses and Aaron as the three first by Aaron the sixt seventh eight and ninth by Moses the fourth and fift though it be not expressed yet it may bee supposed to bee done by the same instruments and againe that place Psalm 105.26 may helpe to expound this Hee sent Moses his servant and Aaron whom he had chosen they shewed among them the message of his signes The messengers then and ministers of these evill plagues were Moses and Aaron 4. Yet I deny not but that God used also therein the ministry of his Angels as it is evident in the last plague of the destruction of the first borne Exod. 12.3 but the meaning of this place in the Psalme is more properly referred to Moses and Aaron And although God useth both the ministry of good Angels in punishing the wicked as in the overthrow of Sodom and Gomorrha and of the evill sometime to trie the righteous as in the temptation of Iob much more in judging the wicked yet in this place for the reasons before alleaged the good Angels are thought rather to have beene used than the evill QUEST XXXI For what ends and causes the Lord wrought such wonders in Egypt THe ends wherefore it pleased the Lord thus to judge Egypt and to shew his mighty workes were divers 1. That the Lord might take just revenge of the Egyptians for the unrighteous vexing and oppressing of his people Exod. 4.23 2. That they by this meanes might bee forced to let Israel goe Exod. 6.1 3. That Gods power might bee knowne to all the world which exceedeth the law of nature or naturall things and that his justice might be made manifest in judging the wicked so the Lord saith For thâ—â— cause have I appointed thee to shew my power in thee and to declare my name throughout all the world Exod. 9.16 4. That the Hebrewes and people of God hereby might perceive the singular care and love of God toward them as Moses urgeth Deut. 4.20 The Lord hath taken you and brought you out of the iron fâ—rnace out of Egypt 5. That the fame of these great workes might keepe other nations in feare and awe of them by whom they should passe that they should not molest or trouble them neither that the Hebâ—ewes should be affraid of them so Rahab saith Iosh. 2.10 We have heard how the Lord dried up the water of the red sea before you when yee came out of Egypt To this purpose the
darkenes should be divided which argument our Saviour useth in the Gospell to shew that he did not cast out devils by the power of Satan 6. Wherefore the best interpretation is that by the finger of God they understood the power of God as the heavens in the Psalme are said to be the worke of his fingers sic Thostatus Lippoman So also is the hand of God taken 1 Sam. 6.9 And hereby is insinuated the great power of God if these horrible plagues were but the worke of his fingers that is an effect of his smallest power what are the workes of his arme and handes when hee sheweth his mightie power for so that which one doth easily or with small labour he is said to doe with his finger as the phrase is used of the Pharises in the Gospell that they laid heavy burdens upon others and would not themselves stirre them with their finger And indeede these plagues of Egypt if they be compared with Gods great workes as the universall floud brought upon all the world the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrha they will appeare to be but workes of Gods fingers in comparison of his whole hand Simler Perer. QUEST XVII Whether the sorcerers had any feeling of Gods power BUt now it will further be inquired whether these sorcerers thus spake as having any knowledge of God or feeling of his power 1. Some thinke that they used this pretence of words to satisfie Pharaoh that was angrie with them because they could not doe now as before and to excuse their want of power Cajetane But it seemeth rather seeing the Sorcerers were indeede hindred and controlled that they spake as they thought 2. Lyranus thinketh that they had no thought at all of God but that they understood the power of some superiour devill And his reason is that if they had in truth confessed and acknowledged the power of God they would not afterward have resisted Moses as it appeareth they did for they were smitten with botches and biles in the sixt plague cap. 9. Contra. But this is a weake argument for though they had at this present some sense of Gods power yet they might afterward returne to their former obstinacie as Pharaoh himselfe would one while seeme to relent and eftsoone be hardned againe and Nebuchadnezzar who upon the interpretation of his dreame by Daniel acknowledged the true God Dan. 2. yet presently after setteth up Idolatrie Perer. 3. Some as is shewed in the former question did thinke that the Magicians had some knowledge and speciall revelation not only of the power of God but of his spirit and so consequently of the Trinitie but such a particular knowledge cannot be ascribed unto them 4. Therefore I thinke rather that for a time they seeing their power hindred did indeede and as they thought acknowledge Gods power that Pharaoh might thereby be left inexcusable Iun. but this knowledge was soone againe obscured by the malice and obstinacie of their heart QUEST XVIII By what power Sorcerers do worke NOw whereas they confesse that Moses wrought by the finger of God they therein evidently bewray that they themselves did not worke by God This therefore shall briefly be made plaine and maniâ—est that Magicians and Sorcerers doe not worke wonders by any divine humane or naturall or Angelicall power I meane the good Angels but Satanicall and Diabolicall 1. These spirits whom they confederate with do require of them divine worship and that affectation of divine honour which they began in heaven and obtained it not being cast downe from thence they seeke to compasse in earth but good Angels refuse to be adored and worshipped as the Angell that appeared to Iohn Revel 22. 2. Sorcerers are men of an impure and wicked life and they use their enchantments to wicked purposes as to theft adulterie murther but good Angels do neither favour wicked men neither will bee assistant in any wicked worke 3. Magicians use to threaten the spirits to enjoyne them certaine impossible things if they come not when they are called but men can exercise no power neither can have any command over the good Angels 4. if it bee objected that Magicians doe often cast out devils but Satan doth not cast out Satan as our Saviour saith for then his kingdome should be divided and could not long stand To this it is answered that our Saviour speaketh of such casting out of devils as is done with power when Satan is violently dispossessed not of such when hee giveth way of himselfe by some compact and contract with the Conjurer And as Augustine saith our Saviour meaneth the perfect ejection of Satan when hee is cast both out of the bodie ad soule But when any seemeth to be cast out by a Satanicall power he goeth out of the bodie that he may more strongly possesse the soule which is indeede no casting out 5. That Sorcerers doe worke by the power of Satan themselves are the best witnesses for Porphyrius who was a great Magician as Eusebius noteth him doth confesse that the devils themselves whom he calleth gods doe signifie unto men quibus rebus dij cogantur qua illis offerendâ— sunt c. with what things the devils are forced and what is to be offered unto them what daies they should chuse what signes and images thâ—y should make and such like And Eusebius further setteth downe to the same purpose an epistle written by Porphyrius to Aâ—ebonus the Egyptian wherein he propoundeth nine inexplicable doubts as he calleth them about Magicall practices 1. How Magicians doe invocate the spirits as their superiours when they command them as their inferiours 2. Why the spirits of Magicians bid men to be just when as they being called upon and sent doe many wicked things 3. They will not heare the Conjâ—rer unlesse hee abstaine from venerie and yet they being sent doe inflame to venerie and unlawfull lust 4. They prescribe their disciples when they are about invocation to abstaine from eating of flesh and yet themselves delight in the smell and bloud of sacrifices 5. They will not have him that hath touched any dead thing to use any Magicall practice and yet many magicall enchantments are practised with dead things both beasts and men 6. They doe terrifie the spirits in their invocations with threats as if they answere not they will reveale the mysteries of Isis and deliver Osiris members to Typhan but how can spirits be feared with threats 7. They use ridiculous invocations as thus they call upon their spirits Thou which camest forth of the slâ—â—e of the earth which hast thy seate in the lake which canst change thy shape every houre which kind of prayers spirits should seeme not to regard 8. They use barbarous and strange words as though the spirits understood only the Scythian or some other barbarous tongue 9. Seeing spirits are insensible and incorporeall how then can they be allured with sensible and corporall things These are Porphyries doubts by the
which it is evident that Sorcerers work by the devill and that from him they have their directions And Augustine also confirmeth the same Neque potuit nisi primis ipsis docentibus disci quâ—d quisque illorum appetat quid exhorreat Neither could it be learned but by their teaching what everie one of them desireth and what they abhorre QUEST XIX Why spirits prescribe constellations to be observed and delight in corporall and externall usages BUt yet concerning some of those doubts a solution may be found out As why the devils will not come being called but under certaine constellations the reason thereof may be to make men beleeve that there is some divine vertue in the starres and so they should be brought to adore and worship them or because they many times worke by naturall causes it may be they are helped by such observations and sometime they concurre in their worke with the planets as Lunatickes are most vexed in the increase of the moone that men might lay the imputation upon the starres as though they were evill Againe why spirits being of no bodily substance yet are allured with hearbes and stones and perfumes and such like Augustine giveth the reason hereof because these things are offered unto them as signes of the divine honour which is given unto them and therefore they delight in them Ex Perer. QUEST XX. Whether it be ordinary for lice to breede out of the slime of Nilus BUt concerning this third plague of lice it will be objected that it is an ordinary thing in Egypt after the inundation of Nilus that divers small creatures as lice frogs and such like do breed in great abundance out of the slime of the earth which Nilus leaveth behind as Herodotus Diodorus Siculus and Solinus do write how then was this such a miraculous worke The answere is this that there is great difference betweene this swarming of lice and that annuall breed of vermine in Egypt 1. They come of the slime of the earth these out of the dust 2. They by the overflowing of Nilus these at the stretching forth of Aarons rod 3. Those swarmes are of divers sorts of small vermine these were lice 4. They are not bred in the signes of Aquarius or Pisces as these were but after the sunne is entred into Virgo for under the signe Leo Nilus increaseth and in the signe Virgo it abateth and returneth Sic Iun. The sunne entreth into Leo about the middest of Iune and into Virgo about the middle of Iuly and into the signe Aquarius in Ianuarie and into Pisces in Februarie which was about a moneth before the Israelites went out of Egypt as is before shewed quaest 29. in cap. 7. QUEST XXI Why Moses is bid to meete Pharoah by the water Vers. 20 STand before Pharaoh he will come forth to the water 1. Because Moses had no accesse unto Pharaohs presence in his palace he is bid to watch him at his comming forth and so he that refused to heare Moses privatly is forced to heare to his shame abroad Ferus 2. Pharaoh used in the morning to come forth to the water either for his health as in the morning it is wholesome to go forth unto rivers or rather of a superstitious minde because they attributed divine honour unto Nilus Simler QUEST XXII Why there is no mention made in this miracle of Moses rod. IN this fourth wonder no mention is made of Moses rod as in the former nor of any other thing used as ashes in the sixth plague God sometime useth such meanes to shew that all things are directed by his will and by these props to raise us up to consider of an higher power than can be in such weake instruments to effect such great things Sometime he worketh without any such meanes to teach vs that he needeth not any such instruments The like difference of working is observed in the miracles of our Saviour Christ in the Gospell who sometime used externall and visible signes as when he tempered clay to heale the blind man sometime he used no such but only healed by his Word Simler QUEST XXIII What manner of swarmes were sent in the fourth plague Vers. 21. I will send mingled swarmes 1. Not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Septuagint the dogge flie which Philo would have so called because this kind of flie doth boldly light upon men and beasts as the dog is noted to be among other beasts most hardie and bold and cannot be chased away till he hath fetched bloud some call it a dog flie because it lighteth most upon dogs about the eares and nose and draweth bloud but the word ghereb signifying a mingled companie sheweth that there was more than of one sort 2. Hierom therefore would have it read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all kind of flies as Aquilas also readeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Latine muscam omnis generis flies of all sorts But it seemeth they were not only flies for the earth was not only corrupted by them vers 24. but the Egyptians also themselves devoured and consumed Psalm 78 45. 3. Neither yet is it like that there were no flies at all in these swarmes as Cajetane thinketh because the Scripture maketh not any mention of any hurt they did to any man but only annoyed their grounds and houses but flies are most noysome unto men but herein Cajetane is deceived for it is said in the Psalme before alleaged that they devoured them that is the Egyptians 4. Some thinke they were all kind of wild beasts as Lions Beares Tigres and such like unto which opinion Iosephus seemeth to incline and Aben Ezra and Pagnin But because it is said that their houses should bee full of these swarmes it is not like they were those huge wild beasts and if they had been assaulted in their houses with ravenous beasts none of them should have escaped And beside it seemeth that the ground was covered with this kind of vermine but so many wild beasts as should cover the earth would have soone devoured all the inhabitans 5. Therefore it is more like that these swarmes were a mixture of divers kinds of noisome creatures both flying as hornets waspes and creeping as vipers scorpions and such like Siâ— Vatab. Rabbi Salomon Pellican QUEST XXIV Of the name of Baalzebub the god of flies IT may seeme probable that upon this and the like plague of flies and other vermine the Egyptians and the Philistims following them as out of whose countrey they came did erect the abominable Idoll of Baalzebub which signifieth the god of flies he was the God of Acearon one of the chiefest cities of the Philistims first some thinke the Idoll was so called of the abundance of flies which were engendred of the bloud of the beasts which were sacrificed Vatab. Or because the Idoll being sprinkled with much bloud did sticke full of flies Perer. 2. But rather it had the name because they supposed this Idoll
have done it and not the Angels as it is said God prepared a worme to smite Ionas gourd Ion. 4.7 Therefore this observation also of Tostatus is untrue 4. But this evasion he hath that if the name of God be used and not of the Angels in such small and particular workes it is for the confirming of those that be weake but they which are weake because they cannot ascend at the first or comprehend the majesty and omnipotency of God had so much the more need by the secondary ministration of Angels to bee brought unto that high and deepe apprehension of God And indeed the ministry of Angels serveth especially for the comfort and supporting of the weake whose faith not serving them immediatly to depend upon God are the more easily brought to have confidence in him by the subordinate deputation and ministry of Angels So when Daniel was in great distresse and perplexity in the lions denne God sent his Angell to stop the mouth of the lions and to comfort Daniel Dan. 6.22 So when Ioseph was doubtfull what to doe concerning Mary an Angell of the Lord appeared unto him in a dreame to confirme him saying Feare not to take Mary for thy wife Matth. 1.20 5. That instance of Iakobs vision of the ladder directly proveth that it was God that appeared unto Iakob and not an Angell 1. Because it is said that Iehovah stood upon it and said by which name of Iehovah no Angell is called in Scripture 2. He that speaketh to Iakob nameth himselfe the Lord God of Abraham 3. He that speaketh is but one but the Angels which ascended and descended were many 4. He saith The land whereon thou sleepest will I give thee and thy seede but the earth is only the Lords 5. Iakob himselfe saith that Iehovah was in that place Gen. 28.16 6. 1. The people were but yet weake while they were in the wildernesse yet then and there that great worke of leading and keeping the people and bringing them to the land of Promise is ascribed to an Angell which was none other but Christ the Angell of Gods presence Exod. 23.20 2. Yea wee shall finde that mention is made oftner in the stories of the Patriarkes and first Fathers of Israel as in the bookes of Genesis and Exodus when they were yet as it were in their infancy of the apparition and ministry of Angels then afterward for it was fit that they should be confirmed by such visible and sensible meanes therefore this reason here alleaged by Tostatus holdeth not 3. And in that place whereof instance is given by Angel is understood some Prophet and man of God not any of the celestiall spirits because the place is named from whence he came from Gilgal and hee is said to ascend or goe up but Angels descend from heaven and it is not unusuall in Scripture to call Prophets the Lords Angels as Hagg. 1.13 and Apocal. 2. and 3. chapter thorowout QUEST XXI Whether it were Iehovah the Lord Christ or an Angell that came downe upon mount Sinai 7. BUt that it was Iehovah himselfe the Lord Christ that appeared in mount Sinai and talked with Moses and gave them the law it is thus proved 1. Because he is called Iehovah which name is never in Scripture given unto Angels 2. Hee saith vers 5. Though all the earth bee mine but the earth is the Lords Psal. 24. not the Angels 3. The Lord here maketh a covenant with his people vers 5. But God himselfe not the Angels make a covenant with men to bee his people And so the Lord saith hee was an husband unto them Iere. 31.32 but Christ and not the Angels is the husband of the Church behold the Church is not the spouse of the Angels but Christs 4. He which writ the Law in tables of stone was the same that gave the Law to Moses but those tables were written by the finger of God Exod. 3â— 18 the same finger that writeth in the fleshy tables of mens hearts Ierem. 31.33 2. Cor. 3.2 5. S. Paul saith it was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediatour Gal. 3.14 The Angels attended as ministers and as the Lords instruments were used in those thunders and lightnings But the Lord himselfe the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament was there present as the Author of the Law as Moses saith The Lord came from Sinai c. he came with ten thousand of Saints and at his right hand a fiery Law for them Deut. 33.2 6. He that wrought those wonders in Egypt and carried the people as upon Eagles wings was the same that delivered the Law vers 4. But Iehovah himselfe did the first for many of the wonders in Egypt could not be done by any but the Lord as in converting and changing of one substance into another as of a rod into a Serpent of water into bloud of the dust into lice And so much Tostatus himselfe confesseth Fiâ—â—ant talia portenta quae nullus poterat facere nisi Deus Such wondrous things were done which none could doe but God So it was Iehovah himselfe that did leade the people thorow the red Sea and destroyed the Egyptians as chap. 14.24 Iehovah looked unto the hoast of the Egyptians out of the fiery and cloudy piller who is before called the Angell of God vers 19. which was the Lord Christ called the Angell of the covenant Malach. 3.1 So chap. 15.14 Iehovah brought the waters of the Sea upon them And further that Iehovah himselfe conducted the Israelites is evident Exod. 33.15 My presence shall go with thee And yet the Lord saith Exod. 23.20 Behold I send an Angell before thee to keepe thee in the way but what Angell this was is expressed afterward my name is in him This great Angell of the covenant in whom was Gods name and his presence who else could it be but the Lord Christ the Iehovah And that God himselfe appeared unto the Patriarkes and Prophets and not the Angels onely it is evident Numb 12.8 where the Lord saith Vnto Moses I will speake mouth to mouth c. he shall see the similitude of the Lord and the Apostle witnesseth that he that is Moses endured at he which saw him which is in visible Heb. 11.27 Not that Moses did see the very glory and substance of God who is invisible and whom never man saw nor can see 1. Tim. 6.12 but he saw only his backe parts Exod. 33.14 that is some part of his glory as the Lord thought good to reveale according as Moses was able to apprehend And that in this place it was Iehovah himselfe that came downe in Mount Sinai beside these reasons before alleaged it is the generall opinion of Divines both old and new Gregor Nyssen Praecepit Deus populo per Moseâ— ut tam corpore quam animo mundus fierit God commanded the people by Moses that they should be cleane both in body and soule Hierom. Accessuri ad audienda verba Dei
of us to be worshipped Ergo the Father Sonne and holy Ghost are that one God Simler So our Saviour saith Yee beleeve in God beleeve also in mee Ioh. 14.1 Christ the Sonne of God is God because he is to be beleeved upon And againe This is life eternall that they know thee to be the only very God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ Ioh. 17.3 God the Father then and Christ his Sonne are the only very God And that the Sonne of God is to be worshipped with the Father the Prophet David sheweth Psal. 2. 11 12. Serve Iehovah in feare c. Kisse the Sonne lest he be angry In the former verse whom hee calleth Sonne here he nameth Jehovah So wee reade in the words of the Prophet Agur Prov 30.4 Who hath established all the ends of the world what is his name and what is his Sonnes name if thou canst tell Further that the Spirit of God is also one God with the Father and Sonne to be worshipped and glorified beside plentifull evidence out of the new Testament which shall not need to be inserted here because we are in hand with the law of the old Testament sufficient testimony may be taken from the law and Prophets as Gen. 1.1 The Spirit of God moved upon the waters But God only created the world So likewise the renovation of the heart is onely the worke of God because it is a new creation as David saith Create in me a new heart Psal. 50.10 but this is also the worke of the Spirit Take not thine holy Spirit from me ibid. vers 11. Likewise it is only Gods worke to teach us his will and to bring us to life eternall but this is wrought by the Spirit Psal. 143.10 Teach mee to doe thy will for thou art my God leâ— thy good Spirit lead me unto the land of righteousnesse Ambrose very fitly proveth the Spirit to be God by that place Iudg. 14.5 where it is said That the Spirit of the Lord came upon Sampson But Iud. 16.20 after his lockes were polled it is also said Hee knew not that the Lord was departed from him Hee which came upon him before was the same that departed from him now there called the Spirit of the Lord and here the Lord and Jehovah therefore the holy Spirit is Lord and Jehovah Ambros. lib. 2. de Spirit cap. 2. Damâ—scen doth thus excellently prove the Trinity by this demonstration Vnus Deus non sine Verbâ— est God being but one is never without the Word but this Word hee hath in himselfe begotten of his owne substance not like unto our word which hath no substance but vanisheth in the aire because the condition of our nature is temporall But like as our word proceeding from the mind neque per totum menti idem est c. is neither the same with the mind nor yet altogether divers from it So is the Sonne unto the Father which is his Word the same in substance but divers in subsistence Oportet autem Verbum Spiritum habere nam verbum nostrum nequaquam spiritus est expers But the Word also must have a Spirit for neither is our word without a spirit but here is the difference our spirit is not of the same substance with us but the drawing in of the aire for wee are of a compound nature but the Spirit of the Word is of the same substance with the Word To this effect Damascen lib. 1. de fide orthodox cap. 6.7 And in the same place he useth another demonstration Impossible est Deum destitutum esse nativae foecunditatis c. It is impossible that God should bee destitute of naturall fecundity The Lord therefore must needs beget Sed ex propriâ— substantia generat but he begetteth out of his owne substance and that from all eternity for if the Sonne had not beene from the beginning coexistent with him of whom hee was begotten we shall bring in a change of his substance Nam cùm non esset Pater postea factus est Pater for so when he was yet no Father he afterward should become a Father c. Damascen ibid. Thus out of the first Commandement both the unity of the Godhead and the Trinity is concluded as Bernard thus elegantly inferreth Quid sibi vult iste ut ita loquar â—ine numero numerus si tria quomodo non numerus si unum ubi numerus What meaneth this number without a number if there be three how can there be but a number if one where is the number But here I have what I may number and what I may not number there is one substance and three persons c. Bernard lib. de consideraâ— Thus by the unity of nature the errour of the Gentiles is abolished and by the joyning of the Word and the Spirit to the Father the Jewish opinion is overthrowne Et ex utraque secta nobis accedit utilitas ex Iâ—daica opinione naturae unitas ex Gentilitia sola personarum discretio So by either sect wee receive some profit by the Iewes opinion the unity of nature by the Gentiles the discerning and difference of the persons only Damasc. ibid. Transgressors then of this Commandement concerning the unity of the Deity and Trinity of the persons are 1. They which affirme and hold one God but deny the three persons as the Montanists and Marcellians in times past and the Turkes and Jewes now 2. They which hold not the distinction of three persons only but the division also of substance as the Tritheists The Arrians and Eunomians are of the same sect qui filium Deum confitentur sed conditum asseverant which confesse the Sonne to bee God but yet affirme him to be made So they bring in another God contrary to this precept Thou shalt have no other Gods c. Theodoret. 3. They which brought in a quaternian of persons as Anastasius the Emperour and the Apollinarians 4. They also which affirme the three persons to be but three names given unto God in Scripture and therefore they say that the Father became man and suffered for us which are therefore called Patripassians 3. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. That justifying faith is not contained or commanded in the law 1. BUt although to beleeve in the Trinity be commanded in the first precept to adore and worship the Father Sonne and holy Ghost as the only God yet it followeth not that justifying faith which properly belongeth to the Gospell whereby we apprehend Christ and his merits should be contained and included in the law therefore we mislike that assertion of Bellarmine concurring therein with other Romanists That the Gospell differeth from the law as a perfect thing from an imperfect and that the Gospell is contained and included in the law as the tree in the seed Bellarm. de justif lib. 4. cap. 4. Some Protestants also come somewhat neere this opinion as Marbachius saith that they offend against this precept Qui Christi
the uncleane nor â—â—y part thereof were not to bee brought into the Tabernacle The cleane beasts were of two sorts either such which they might eat of but not sacrifice as the Hart the Rocbuck and the like but these being uncleane in respect of any religious use because they were not to be sacrificed no part thereof was to be brought into the Tabernacle And as for the cleane beasts which might â—e sacrificed the fat thereof was to be burned upon the Altar Tostat. qu. 6. 2. These spices were of two sorts some were to be tempered and incorporate together to make a soft and liquid ointment and some to be beaten to powder to make a sweet perfume they were to bring them not mixed or compounded but in their simple nature for neither did they know how to compound them but Moses by Gods direction shewed after how they should be made and beside if they had brought the ointment and perfume ready compounded there had beene danger lest they should have prophaned it for their private uses which is straitly forbidden chap. 30. Tostat. qu. 8. QUEST XIV Of the mysticall and morall application of these divers oblations COncerning the spirituall application and end of these divers oblations 1. Beda doth mystically interpret them by the gold he understandeth a sincere faith more precious than gold by silver the confession of faith by the blew or silke colour the lifting up of our hearts to heaven by the purple the sufferings and passions which are endured for the truth by the double scarlet the two fold love of God and our neighbours by the silke the chastity of the flesh by the goats heire whereof they made sackcloth repentance 2. But Rupertus application is more fit and lesse curious by these divers oblations he understandeth the divers gifts which God hath bestowed upon his Church As some he gave to be Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists Haec grandia dona aurum argentum sunt c. These great gifts are as the gold silver and precious stones whereby the spirituall Temple is built 3. Likewise Procopius maketh this morall use that as here the Lord accepteth not only the gold and silver sed neque laâ—aem caprinam aspernatur c. so neither doth he despise even the goats haire if it be offered with a franke mind c. So God refuseth not the smallest and meanest gifts which are offered unto him in faith as our blessed Saviour commended the devotion of the poore widow that threw two mites into the treasury QUEST XV. Of the signification of the Sanctuary and wherefore it was ordained Vers. 8. ALso they shall make me a Sanctuarie 1. Some Hebrew Rabbines as R. Abraham Ab. Ezra doe very curiously by the Tabernacle decipher the three worlds the Intellectuall world where is the seat of God with his Angels for so over the Arke was Gods mercy seat and the Cherubims stretching their wings over it represented the Angels and blessed Spirits And the Materiall world as they would have the blew covering to signifie heaven the vaile the clouds the seven lampes the seven planets by the fire on the Altar and the water in the laver they understand the element of fire and water So the third world which is called the little world which is within man they would have represented by this Tabernacle as in the Arke there were two tables so there is in mans minde understanding and reason as there were divers instruments in the Tabernacle for divers purposes so in man there are divers organicall parts for the naturall functions and operations And in this curious manner the Rabbines goe on pleasing themselves in their owne fansies whereas the Lord ordained not his Tabernacle for any such end or purpose but onely that they might have a place where to professe the worship of God that he might dwell among them and shew them comfortable signes of his presence in hearing their prayers and granting their requests 2. Yea these Rabbines to their curiosity adde impiety for they thinke that God ordained the Tabernacle and the instruments of divers figures and divers mettals Vt diversae virtutes à coelestibus influxae recipiantur c. That thereby divers vertues should have their influence from the celestiall bodies and to this end they say the Temple was afterward built at Jerusalem because of some supernaturall influence in that place more than in others In which Rabbinicall assertion Ab. Ezra bewrayeth 1. Both impiety making God as an Inchanter or Sorcerer working by figures and mettals as Magicians in their inchantments observe such things whereas the Lord by his Law condemneth all such superstitions 2. As also absurdity tying the Lords supernaturall working to certaine places and instruments Gods naturall operation indeed is exercised by such naturall subordinate meanes as he hath appointed but his supernaturall worke is not limited to places nor meanes 3. Likewise an impossibility followeth in making corporall and materiall things the instruments to convey spirituall graces whereas spirituall things are not derived but by spirituall meanes Tostat. qu. 9. 3. But the true ends wherefore the Sanctuary was ordained where these First the Historicall that seeing God had made the Israelites a peculiar people to himselfe that they might have a peculiar kinde of worship from all other nations therefore God appointeth a certaine place with certaine persons and Ministers by whom certaine rites and ceremonies should be performed whereby he would be worshipped with more reverence sanctity and purity than the Gentiles worshipped their gods Tostat. qu. 9. Secondly for the mysticall end Beda saith that this earthly Tabernacle representeth the heavenly unto the similitude whereof we should conforme our selves in earth Si ad Angelorum in coelis consortia tendimus debemus vitam eorum in terris c. imitari If we tend to enjoy the company of Angels in heaven we should imitate their life in earth The Tabernacle also signifieth Christ by whom God is worshipped and in whom God doth manifest himselfe unto us Simler Thirdly every faithfull man is this Temple of God as the Apostle applieth it Ye are the temple of the living God as God hath said I will dwell among them and walke there Whereupon Bernard maketh this morall application Et nos mundemus conscientiam nostram c. And let us purge our conscience that when the Lord commeth paratam in nobis inveniat mansionem he may finde in us a mansion prepared QUEST XVI How the Lord is said to dwell in the Sanctuary Vers. 8. THat I may dwell among them 1. God hath three kinde of temples Habitat principaliter in seipso c. He dwelleth principally in himselfe because he onely comprehendeth himselfe as Apocal. 21.22 The Lord God almightie and the Lamb are the temple of the celestiall Ierusalem Habitat Deus in doâ—â— sacrata c. God also dwelleth in his sacred house by that spirituall worship which is there exhibited unto him Habitat Christus per
the old and new Lippom. panes azymi munditiam vita the unleavened bread betokeneth the holinesse of life without the leaven of maliciousnesse as S. Paul expoundeth 1 Cor. 6. 2. The solemne washing of Aaron and his sons did signifie the Sacrament of Baptisme and as they doe not put on their garments untill first the filth of the flesh be washed away Sic nisi in Christo novi homines renaseantur So unlesse they become new men in Christ they are not admitted unto holy things Hierom. They which come unto God must first bee purged and cleansed from their sins Pelarg. And hereby more specially was signified in this solemne washing with water the publike Baptisme of Christ which though he needed not in respect of himselfe yet thereby he would consecrate that Sacrament for us Osiander 3. By the putting on of the Priestly garments after they were washed is signified the putting on of Christ cum tunicas polliceas deposuerimus after we have put off our old vestures Hierom. So Procopius applieth those words of the Apostle Put on the Lord Iesus Christ So also Pelarg. 4. By the oyle wherewith Aaron was annointed Beda understandeth Gratiam Spiritus sancti The grace of the Spirit And Hierom here applieth that saying of the Prophet David Psal. 45. God even thy God hath annointed thee with the oyle of gladnesse above thy fellowes Therefore was Aaron onely annointed in the head and none of the rest because Christ received the Spirit beyond measure and the holy Ghost descended and lighted upon him when he was baptized Matth. 3. Osiander QUEST X. Why the Priests lay their hands upon the head of the beast Vers. 10. AAron and his sons shall put their hands upon the head c. 1. Augustine by this ceremonie understandeth the receiving of power Vt ipsi etiam aliquid consecrare possent that they also might consecrate afterward unto God So also Lyranus But because the people also did use to lay their hands upon their sacrifices which they brought Levit. 4. who received thereby no power to sacrifice this seemeth not to be the meaning 2. Iunius thus expoundeth it Quasi seipses sisterent sacrificarent Iehovae As though they did present themselves to bee sacrificed unto God yet not in their owne person but Christs But this cannot be the meaning for the former reason because the people did also lay on their hands who were therein no type of Christ that sacrificed himselfe for us 3. Some thinke that by this ceremonie in imposing of their hands they did resigne their right in that beast Tostat. Et destinarunt illud ut fieret sacrificium and ordained it to be a sacrifice Osiander 4. But there is more in it than so they hereby confesse that they were worthie to die in Gods justice for their sins Sed ex divina misericordia mors in animal transferebatur But by the divine mercie their death was transferred upon the beast Lyran. wherein Christ is lively shadowed forth who died for us Simler QUEST XI Of the divers kinds of sacrifices and why some kinde of beasts were taken for sacrifice and not other Vers. 11. SO thou shalt kill the calfe c. 1. There were three kinde of sacrifices which were usually offered the first was called holocaustum a burnt offering because it was wholly consumed upon the Altar and this kinde was offered specially ad reverentiam majestatis for reverence of the divine majestie to testifie our obedience and service The second was the sacrifice for sin whereof part was burned upon the Altar part was for the Priests use unlesse it were a sin offering for the Priest or the people in which cases all was consumed on the Altar The third sort were peace offerings which were offered in signe of thanksgiving for some benefit received or to be received whereof part was burnt upon the Altar part was for the Priest and the rest was for the offerer Thom. 2. Now although there were many cleane birds and beasts yet there were onely two kinde of the one the pigeon and turtle dove and three of the other bullocks sheepe and goats which were taken for sacrifice whereof Philo giveth this reason because both among the fowles and beasts these are of the meekest and mildest nature the pigeon and turtle dove and amongst the beasts these three sorts are tamest when we see that whole heards and flocks of them may be driven by a boy and they have neither pawes or clawes to hurt as ravenous beasts nor yet armed with teeth to devoure wanting the upper row wherein appeareth the harmlesse disposition of these creatures Philo addeth further that these beasts of all other are most serviceable unto mans use sheepe and goats for cloathing and food and bullocks beside the use of their flesh for meat and their skins for leather they serve with their labour in the tilling of the ground To these may a third reason bee added because the land of Canaan most abounded with these kinds of fowles and beasts they are prescribed for sacrifice And a fourth also may be this they were not to offer of wilde beasts because they could not easily bee had and hardly are they gotten alive for which cause they were not appointed to offer fishes which could not so easily be taken and very hardly alive but their sacrifices must be brought alive Riber 3. Now in the consecration of Aaron and his sons all these sacrifices are offered a bullocke for a sinne offering one ramme for a burnt offering and another for a peace offering QUEST XII Why the bloud was laid upon the horns of the Altar Vers. 12. THou shalt take of the bloud and put it upon the hornes c. 1. The bloud here was not used to confirme any league or covenant betweene God and his people as chap. 24. for in that case first the words and articles of the covenant were read before the bloud was sprinkled and beside each partie betweene whom the covenant was made were besprinkled not onely the Altar which represented God but the people also But here neither of these is performed there is no covenant rehearsed neither are the people sprinkled with the bloud 2. There was then another use beside this of the sprinkling of bloud which was to purge and cleanse and so to pacifie and appease as this reason is yeelded why they should not eat the bloud because the Lord had given it to be offered upon the Altar to be an atonement for their soules Levit. 17.11 And not onely the Altar of burnt offering was cleansed by bloud but the whole Tabernacle the high Priest in the day of reconciliation sprinkled the bloud upon the Mercie seat and before the Mercie seat the Altar and Tabernacle also to purge them from the sins and trespasses of the people Levit. 16.16 Therefore the Apostle saith Almost all things by the law are purged with bloud Heb. 9.22 The bloud of the sacrifices then was put upon
Altar Simler 2. But here the bloud is not appointed to be laid upon the hornes of the Altar as in the sinne offering not because as some thinke in the sinne offering expiation was made for sinne and therefore the hornes of the Altar were touched with bloud for in other sacrifices also there was expiation of sinne as Levit. 1.4 it is said of the burnt offering It is his atonement and the peace offering also was for a sweet savour Levit. 33. And generally in every sacrifice the bloud which was offered upon the Altar was for atonement Levit. 17.11 now the Altar was sprinkled with bloud both in the burnt offerings Levit. 1.5 and in the peace offerings 3·2 therefore in them also there was atonement made But because the sinne offering was specially and principally intended to be a sacrifice for sinne whereas the other directly were referred to the praise of God therefore after a more speciall manner the hornes of the Altar are touched with bloud in the sacrifice for sinne and not in the other Tostat. quast 8. QUEST XX. Why the dung in the sinne offerings being an uncleane thing was prescribed to be burned Vers. 17. ANd wash the inwards and the legs c. This rite and usage was not observed before in the sinne offering for there the skin and dung was burnt without the host But here this doubt will be moved seeing that no uncleane thing must be offered unto God how the dung could be burnt with fire For answer whereunto 1. It must be considered that this was no part of the sacrifice properly for the sacrifices which were offered unto God were burnt upon the Altar but these things were burnt without the host so likewise the red cow which was burnt without the host with the skin and dung Numb 19. was not properly a sacrifice offered unto God though it were an holy rite by him ordained to be observed 2. This ceremonie in burning the skin and dung of the sin offering without the host was prescribed to be done to this end ad monstrandam detestationem peccatorum magnorum c. to shew the detestation of great and enormous sinnes and therefore this rite was onely observed in the sin offerings for the Priest and the whole congregation to shew that their sinnes were greatest in the sin offerings for the trespasses of others it was not prescribed Tostat. quaest 10. QUEST XXI Why the burnt offering was so called and how it differed from other sacrifices Vers. 18. FOr it is a burnt offering unto the Lord. 1. The name in Greeke is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so called because it was whole or all burnt upon the Altar saving the skin in other sacrifices as for sinne and in the peace offerings certaine parts onely were burnt as the fat and the kidneyes with some other parts but here all was consumed Tostat. qu. 10. 2. But the word in the originall is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gholah or as Iun. reades hholah Oleaster pronounceth it without an asperation â—lah which is derived of ghalah to ascend so called because it all ascended into vapour and smoake Oleaster 3. So this holocaust or burnt offering is commended for three things 1. Because it was a burnt offering it was all consumed upon the Altar 2. In respect of the effect it was a sweet savour all here turned into vapour and so gave a more fragrant smell than the other sacrifices which did not send up such a cloud of vapour or smoake because they were not all consumed as the burnt offering was 3. It was an offering made by fire Dicâ—tur hoc ad differentiam elixorum which is so said by way of difference from those things which are boyled in water Cajetan QUEST XXII Why the burnt offering is called a sweet savour Vers. 18. FOr a sweet savour 1. The word is riach nicâ—oaâ—h a savour of rest that is an acceptable savour wherein the Lord delighteth and being thereby appeased resteth and ceaseth from his anger Oleaster It is a metaphor taken from sweet odors wherein he which smelleth a sweet savour resteth and contenteth himselfe Non parientes aliquid fastidii c. such odors as bring no loathsomnesse Cajetan 2. Which phrase must be figuratively taken for properly God nor no other spirit is said to smell for savour and smell is the object of the sense of smelling Spirits then not being endued with the sensitive facultie are not properly affected with the object of the sense And though the Lord should bee affected with smells yet the savour that commeth from the burning of flesh of it selfe is not so pleasant and savourly Tostat. qu. 10. 3. Therefore it is said to be an acceptable savour unto God in regard of their obedience and willing minde as Augustine Deum delectat cùm spiritualiter exhibetur God is delighted when it is spiritually presented c. that is with faith and true devotion of the heart So also Theodoret Sacrificium quod ex lege fiebat suavem odorem appellavit The sacrifice which was done according to the law he calleth a sweet odor Therefore where the externall act was offered without the inward devotion and obedience the Lord was not pleased with such sacrifices as with Cains and Sauls Tostat. qu. 10. 4. But it is called a savour of rest specially because it was a type and sacrifice of our blessed Saviour who was indeed an offering and a sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God Ephes. 5.2 Osiander Gallas To the same purpose before them Procopius Christ was offered for us all unto his Father in odorem bonae fragrantia for a sweet smelling savour QUEST XXIII Of the mysticall sense of the ramme of burnt offering FOr the mysticall sense of this second sacrifice of the first ram which was a burnt offering 1. Procopius by cutting the same in peeces understandeth the divers members of Christ which make all one bodie by the washing of the inward parts sermonis puritatem the purenesse of speech 2. Pelargus by the division of the parts would have signified the right dividing of the Word by the washing of the inwards the purging of our internall parts by the burnt offering the consecration both of our bodies and soules unto God 3. But these figures are more fitly accommodated and applied to Christ. By the killing of the ram the division of the parts and the washing of them is shadowed forth the passion of Christ and by the burnt offering the ardent love of Christ quo totus in cruce conflagravit wherewith he was all as it were set on fire on the crosse Marbach 4. And as the burnt offering ascended up in the fire so Christ is ascended into heaven having obtained eternall redemption for us and afterward sent the fire of his Spirit upon his Apostles Simlerus Borrhaius QUEST XXIV Of the third ram why it is called the ram of consecracion Vers. 20. ANd take of the bloud and put upon the lap of Aarons eare c. 1.
Because the seventh day is determined wherein he rested then consequently they were six daies wherein he was making the world 2. Mention is made of the evening and morning therefore the day and night one succeeded another 3. And seeing light was created the first day and light and darknesse could not be at once in the same hemisphere the one therefore must needs successively follow the other 2. But yet although God made the world successively in respect of the daies which one succeeded another and all was not made in one day Yet Tostatus opinion is not to be received that in some of the works of the creation God did agere persuccessionem worke by succession and in time and did not produce the creatures in instanti in an instant The first second and fourth daies worke he granteth were done in an instant but the third daies worke was done successively the winde helping to drie it which is said to have moved upon the waters And the plants and trees were brought out of the earth in time God giving such great strength and force to the earth to bring them forth As he giveth instance of some herbs as 〈◊〉 parsely that will grow out of the ground in the space of two houres Likewise in the creation of man hee thinketh it is probable that the Angels made his bodie of the slime of the earth and the Lord breathed in the breath of life Contra. 1. That God created 〈…〉 Psal. 33.9 he spake and 〈…〉 2. That was not the winde which moved upon the 〈…〉 as in the same Psalme vers â— the Spirit is called the breath of Gods mouth By 〈…〉 Lord were the heavens made and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth 3. Neither did God use the helpe of the Angels in the framing of mans bodie he did it himselfe for when he said Let us make man in our image he consulted not with the Angels but with the blessed Trinitie for he was created in the image of God Genes 1.27 nor in the image of Angels for then Christ when he was made man should have taken upon him the nature of Angels which the Apostle denieth Hebr. 2.16 And it is directly said that God Iehovah made the man of the dust of the earth Genes 2 7. but Iehovah is not given unto any Angell it is a name peculiar unto God QUEST XIX How the Lord is said to have rested and from what Vers. 17. IN the seventh day he ceased and breathed 1. Which is a metaphor taken from those which when they have sore laboured doe breath and take aire Oleaster Not that God was wearied with the works of the creation but he onely left creating all things being finished which he intended to make and he did it for our instruction that we by his example might keep an holy rest 2. God then ceased from creating of another world Osiand or from creating any new workes for then the creation had not been perfect if any thing had been wanting neither could it have been said God saw all that hee had made and loe it was verie good Gen. 1.31 3. But he ceased not both from preserving that which hee had made which is no new worke but that was continued during all the six daies and is exercised still Tostat. For God is not like to a builder of an house or carpenter of a ship which having finished his worke so leaveth it but Gods providence still watcheth over that which he hath made Gallas Likewise the Lord ceaseth not from making particular works daily for he doth wonderous things and miraculous thorow the world sed non creat novas species he doth not create now any new kind Marbach 4. Then here appeareth the error of certaine Hebrewes which thinke that the Sabbath which is called Saturns day was appointed first to bee kept because that is an unluckie planet and unfortunate and therefore it was not fit to undertake any businesse upon that day for the reason appeareth to be this because God rested upon the seventh day and they will not say that God was afraid to doe any thing upon Saturns day Tostatus quest 11. 5. Againe hence is gathered a firme reason for the continuance and perpetuitie of the Sabbath because God did not create the heaven and earth only for the sonnes of Iacob but for all men Quibus ex aquâ— Creator est nemiâ—em ergo ab isto Sabbatisâ—â— excludi c. To whom he is a Creator alike and therefore no man is to be exempted from the keeping of the Sabbath Lippoman QUEST XX. What workes are to be rested from upon the Lords day what not ANd as God rested not from all kind of workes upon the seventh day so neither are all kind of workes unlawfull now to be done upon the Lords day of rest The workes that men attend are of two sorts either naturall or voluntarie 1. Naturall workes are not forbidden to be done as to eat drinke sleepe so they be done in order and measure 2. Voluntarie works are either good or evill evill workes are at all times unlawfall much more upon the sabbath 3. Good workes are either sacred or civill and politicall the sacred are either immediatly belonging to the worship of God as the duties of the first Table which principally are to be done upon the Lords day 4. Or they are such workes as are mediatly referred unto God as the workes of mercie the duties of the second Table which also if occasion so require are to bee done upon this day as to visite the sicke to helpe those that are in danger 5 The politike workes follow as the workes of mens vocation merchandise making of warre all which must be intermitted upon the Lords day and therefore that commandement beginneth with Remember that men aforehand should thinke of the Lords day and not deferre any of their busines till then but vrgent necessitie constraining such things may be done then as the Macchabees did fight upon the Sabbath and the Disciples of Christ being hungrie pulled the eares of corne Marbach QUEST XXI Whether Moses received the directions concerning the Tabernacle in the first or second fortie daies Vers. 18. THus when the Lord had made an end of communing with Moses c. 1. R. Salâ—m whom Lyranus followeth understandeth this communing or speech of God with Moses only of the former charge concerning the Sabbath not of all the declaration before going which concerned the making of the Tabernacle which hee thinketh was done in Moses second going up to the Lord after the people had made the golden calfe and so he thinketh the historie to be transposed 2. Contra. 1. First as sometime in Scripture the order of time is changed and the historie transposed when there is any apparant cause to meet with some inconvenience which otherwise might follow so to imagine any such transposing where there is no such necessitie were to bring in such an uncertaintie into the sacred storie as
thinke diversum aliquid hic notari that some divers thing is here noted than before for in the same sense the Lord is said to goe before them and to goe with them in the middest of them But in that the Lord saith againe vers 17. I will doe this thing also which thou hast said it is evident that Moses added somewhat to his former request and begged somewhat which was not yet granted though Calvin thinketh it is but the repetition of the same thing tollenda dubitationis causa to take from Moses all doubting So also Oleaster 2. Some doe thinke that Moses here asketh a divers thing from that which the Lord granted where there are divers opinions 1. Lyranus taketh it that whereas God promised to goe before Moses he further entreateth that hee would totum populum praecedere goe before not him only but all the people c. But the Lords promise was generall that his presence should goe before not expressing whom and Moses request which the Lord yeeldeth unto wherein hee maketh mention of the people vers 13. sheweth that the Lord so meant that hee would be a guide to all the people 2. Cajetan saith because the Lord had promised only in generall My face shall goe not expressing whether antâ— eos cum eis post eos before them with them or behinde them now he entreateth that hee would goe with him But Moses repeating Gods words doth put to no such limitation only hee saith If thy presence goe not carrie us not hence by which repeating of Gods words Moses knew well enough that God promised to goe before them 3. Rupertus therefore and Tostatus follow this sense that because the Lord by his presence might understand some Angell he presseth God yet further that he would goe himselfe with them But this answer is granted upon the oversight of the Latine translation which readeth here If thou wilt not goe before whereas in the originall it is being well translated If thy presence goe not So that Moses by Gods presence understandeth God himselfe as hee expoundeth vers 16. shall it not bee when thou goest with us 4. Wherefore in this reply Moses partly confirmeth the Lords answer by shewing the inconvenience that would follow that it were better for them to remaine there still than without Gods presence to goe on and offer themselves to infinite danger partly hee intreateth that God would not onely goe before them as he did before others of the Heathen whom he used in his service as he raised and stirred up Cyrus whom he conducted as the Lord saith by his Prophet Thus saith the Lord to Cyrus his anointed whose right hand I have holden to subdue nations before him c. I will goe before thee and make the crooked strait c. But that the Lord would also dwell among them in his Tabernacle as he purposed And therefore the Lord herein condescending to Moses saith afterward vers 17. I will doe this also which thou hast said that is Non solum praibo sed vobiscum ero I will not only go before you but with you also Gallas So Moses also in saying that the people may have preheminence entreateth ut non cesset Deus facere signa coram gentibus that the Lord would not cease still to doe signes and wonders for his people before the nations that they may know that God is among them Ferus Simlerus Osiander For the faithfull are not satisfied nisi Deum totum habeant unlesse they have God wholly and all Ferus QUEST XXXII Why Moses addeth Carrie us not hence seeing even in that place also they had need of Gods protection Vers. 15. CArrie us not hence 1. Calvin so understandeth Moses here as though hee should meane that it were better perire in deserto to perish in the desart than to goe forward without Gods presence But Moses by no meanes would have wished the perishing of the people for whose preservation he intreated so earnestly before wishing himselfe rather to be raced out of Gods booke than them to perish 2. Rupertus draweth it to a mysticall sense Carrie us not hence c. Quid attinet nos vivere c. To what end should we live and beget children unlesse thou come which onely canst regenerate unto life those which are borne to death c. He applyeth it to the comming of the Messiah but the phrase here used Carrie us not hence sheweth that Moses here speaketh of going into the land of Canaan for otherwise the Messiah might have beene given unto them as well in this place as in Canaan 3. His meaning therefore is melius esse iter non ingredi that it were better for them not to goe thence at all unlesse God would be their guide Simler not to stirre one foot from thence 4. Which Moses speaketh not as though they needed not Gods protection and preservation there but because they were subject to many more dangers in walking forward still for they were to passe by the countries of divers nations who would suspect them as having a purpose to invade their land whereas now remaining still they should not be molested of any Tostat. qu. 16. QUEST XXXIII Why it is added People upon the earth Vers. 16. ALL the people that are upon the earth 1. This is not added by way of distinction as though there were any people under the earth they which are gone out of the world are called people as Abraham is said to be gathered unto his people but not properly because they are spirits and not men in hell there can be no people because there is no order nor communitie as where a people is there is a mutuall communitie and they are governed by Law nor yet in heaven is there said to bee a people properly their bodies being laid aside their spirits only there living in bliffe 2. Neither are those which are called Antipodes which dwell on the other side of the earth under but upon the earth as we are 3. Sed positum est ex superabundantia This is added of abundance for more plaine evidence and demonstration Tostat. qu. 16. QUEST XXXIV Whether Moses desired to see the verie divine nature and essence of God Vers. 18. I Beseech thee shew me thy glorie 1. Ferus thinketh that Moses only asked of God to shew him certaine signes and evidences of his glorie quibus omnes homines te agnoscant credant whereby all men may acknowledge thee and beleeve in thee But this had beene a lawfull request and the Lord would not have denied it 2. Some thinke that Moses desired ostendi sibi aspectabilem formam divinae majestatis that there might be shewed unto him some visible forme of the divine Majestie not for his owne satisfaction but to content the rude people that he might make some description thereof unto them who desired to be instructed by some visible demonstration which was the cause why they caused in Moses absence a Calfe
to shoot thorow the boords Whether this middle barre went quite thorow the boords in the midst within is handled at large quest 22. chap. 26. whither I referre the Reader here only this point shall be briefely touched whether this middle barre were only in the West end of the boords and not on the sides 1. Tostatus thinketh it was only in the west end because it is said it went thorow from corner to corner but on the sides there was but one corner where it joyned with the west end neither was there any need of a middle bar for the sides but only in the ends to hold both the sides together Tostat. qu. 2. Contra. 1. Though the Latine Interpreter read from corner to corner yet the Hebrew word hakatzeh properly signifieth an end so it must be translated from end to end as Vatab. Pagnin Montan. Iun. Chalde the Septuagint read to the same purpose from side to side 2. The middle bar served not to hold the sides together for to that end were the two corner boords which were double but to strengthen the boords and to joyne them one to another therefore there was the like necessitie of this middle bar also in the sides as well as in the end 2. Wherefore the better opinion is unumquodque ex tribus lateribus habuisse talem vâ—ctem that everie of the three sides had such a bar Osiander For this middle barre was one of the five ranke of barres which was in the middest now everie side had these five orders or rankes of barres as is evident out of the text QUEST IV. To what purpose the hookes upon the pillars served Vers. 38. FIve pillars with their hookes c. 1. Some Hebrewes thinke that these hookes served to hang the sacrifices upon which should bee offered upon solemne dayes But that is not like for these reasons 1. The pillars which the first veile did hang before had also hookes vers 36. but thither were brought in no sacrifices 2. If the bloudie sacrifices had hung upon these hookes they would have marred and spotted the veiles 2. Therefore these hookes were to no other end than for the cords to be fastened to whereon the veiles did ride to and fro Oleaster The other questions out of this chapter see handled before chap. 26. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. That all things ought not to be common among Christians Vers. 3. THey brought still unto them free gifts Whereas the people are willed by Moses to bring their offerings toward the worke of the Tabernacle and afterward when they had brought sufficient they are bid to bring no more this sheweth that all things ought not to bee common among the people of God for then there could not be properly any gift because one should not give of his owne everie one having a like interest in that which was given Marbach 2. Doct. It is lawfull to possesse and enjoy riches ANd further in that some brought jewels of gold and silver and other precious things it is evident that it is lawfull to possesse and enjoy the riches of this world so they be well gotten and charitably used and employed Marbach Abraham was rich not onely in cattell but in silver also and gold Gen. 13.2 and Ioseph was a rich man that begged the body of Jesus Matth. 27.57 3. Doct. Of the right use of riches BUt in the possessing of riches speciall care must be had of the right use of them which is threefold 1. There is a necessarie use of riches either private as in the education of children and other domesticall affaires for he that provideth not for his owne c. is worse than an infidell or publike in civill duties as in paying custome tribute c. Rom. 13.7 and supporting other necessarie charges of the Common-wealth and in Ecclesiasticall as in maintenance of the Ministers of the Gospell Gal. 6.6 2. There is another use of riches in expences non ad necessitatem sed ad honestatem not for meere necessitie but for comelinesse and honestie Diogenes would not allow that any should weare a gold ring or have any other ornaments or feed of any delicate meat or use any costly apparrell But as the Scriptures alloweth diversitie of callings and degrees among men so it condemneth not that everie man in his order in his behaviour apparrell maintenance should bee sutable to his degree so it be done without pride and vaine-glorie as Ioseph being exalted to honour by Pharaoh did weare a gold ring fine linnen and a golden chaine he did also eat and drinke of the best 3. The third use of riches is in liberalitie and beneficence toward the poore with such sacrifices God is pleased Heb. 13. Marbach 4. Doct. The use of Temples and Churches lawfull Vers. 8. THey made the Tabernacle As the Israelites had their Tabernacle so is it lawfull for Christians to have Temples and Churches and peculiar places for the service of God yea we refuse not such places as have beene superstitiously abused in time past to idolatrie so they bee purged from all monuments of superstition The good Kings of Judah did indeed pull downe the houses of Baal and other idolatrous temples because it was not lawfull for them to have any more temples but one namely that at Jerusalem but the case is otherwise now with us Simler 5. Doct. Of the Church of Christ the parts divers kindes and the signes thereof THis Tabernacle was a type and figure of Christs Church which is a company of men acknowledging and worshipping the true God whom Christ doth regenerate and sanctifie here with his Spirit and purposeth afterward to glorifie them in his Kingdome This Church is either universall and generall or particular The universall Church called the Catholike Church comprehendeth the faithfull in all ages times and places and it consisteth of two principall parts of the triumphant Church in heaven or the militant here in earth This militant Church here in earth is said also to be holy and without spot partly by the imputation of the righteousnesse of Christ partly because the righteousnesse thereof is begun here and perfected in the next world It is also the seat of truth because it professeth Christ the foundation of all truth yet is it not altogether without spot in this world It is two wayes considered it is visible when a multitude doe outwardly professe the faith of Christ and in this visible Church there may be many hypocrites and carnall livers the invisible is the company or societie onely of beleevers who are knowne unto God and not unto the world Particular Churches are so said to be in respect of particular countries cities or families which all are in effect but one generall Church as all holding of the same head Christ Jesus This Church is knowne by certaine marks some which are essentiall unto it the preaching of the Word and puritie of doctrine and the right administration of the Sacraments Some which are
of the altars which the Patriarkes had made to aske counsell of God seeing God was every where present to the prayers of the faithfull 7. Neither are we to imagine that she used any such superstitious way as to lay aguâ—â— castus lawrell or any such thing under her head to have a dreame or a vision as she had seene her friends to doe in her owne countrey sic author histor scolastic in Gen. c. 66. for she was farre from such superstitious toies ex Perer. 8. Nor yet did she consult with God by Abraham then living as Aben Ezra Iun. for this oracle was given her by Gods owne mouth rather than mans Calvin 9. But she went to some secret place to pray and received some revelation from God Muscul Calvin Mercer Perer. QUEST XXXII How many waies they used to consult with God in Israel FOure waies they used to aske counsell of God in Israel 1. Beside the casting of lots which was but seldome used as by Iosua in Achans cause Iosua 7. and by Samuel at the election of Saul 1 Sam. 10. and by Saul to finde out the transgression of his vow by Ionathan 1 Sam. 14. there were three waies beside to aske counsell of God which are mentioned together 1. Sam. 28.6 by dreames urim and prophets 2. The second way was by dreames and visions as the Lord spake to the elder Patriarkes but this way God seldome revealed his will by after he sent them prophets and for these visions they used to prepare themselves by fasting and prayer Dan. 10.3 3. They used in hard and difficult matters to seeke unto the prophets as Saul went to Samuel 1. King 9. Ieroboam sent his wife to Ahiah the Prophet 1 King 14. These Prophets had such matters revealed unto them three waies 1. The Lord instructed them aforehand as he did Samuel before Saul came at him 2. Sometime at the same instant when they were consulted with as the Angel of God spake to Eliah 2. King 1.15 3. Sometime the Prophet presently gave no answer but waited upon God by prayer as Dan. 9. or stirred himselfe up extraordinarily that the spirit might come upon them as Elisha did 2. King 3.15 4. They also consulted with God by the priest who asked counsell of God for them by his Vrim as Abiathar applyed the Ephod for David 1. Sam. 23.9 30.7 Now the Priest received answer by the Ephod not as the Hebrewes fable by finding written in the foulds and pleats of the Vrim the sentence or answer of God nor as Iosephus supposeth by the extraordinary shining of the stones in the Vrim which miraculous kind of answering he confesseth to have ceased two hundred yeares before his time 3. antiquit Iudaic. for how could the shining of the stones be a signe in such variety of matters which were demanded of the priests and more than two hundred yeares before Iosephs time who lived vnder Domitian were such gifts of prophecying ceased as under Iudas Maccabeus 1 Maccab. 4.46 yea long before that the Church complained We see not our signes there is not one prophet more Psal. 74.9 And further the Scripture would not have beene silent in setting downe such a miraculous gift Therefore God did otherwise reveale unto the priest and inspire him with the knowledge of his will by the illumination of his minde for so Vrim signifieth illumination Perer. QUEST XXXIII How the elder is said to serve the younger Vers. 23. TWo manner of people shall be divided out of thy bowels c. the greater shall serve the lesse 1. The Hebrewes apply this text against the Empire of the Romans whose Emperors they say came of the Idumeans as Iulius Caesar the rest that succeeded him who though they held the Iewes in subjection in the end should be destroyed sic David Kimhi Rabbi Salomon ex citat Perer. 2. But the right literall meaning is of the Idumeans and Israelites the posterity of Esau and Iacob for so we read that the Idumeans were subdued unto Israel by King David 2. Sam. 8.14 and so continued to the reigne of Iotham Mercer 3. Neither were the Israelites onely superiour in temporall dominion but also in spiritual blessings for they were the visible Church of God Edom was cut off Calvin 4. Spiritually these two people doe signifie the carnall Iewes subdued unto the Christians being yet themselves the elder people August lib. 16. de civitat c. 25. Againe by the striving of Esau and Iacob in their mothers wombe is signified the continuall fight in the wombe of the Church betweene the true and carnall professors which are said to be the greater because they are more in number but as the greater here did serve the lesse so the wicked while they persecute the righteous quibus nocere volunt prâ—sunt plurimum stirâ—â—â—tem ipsi maxime nocent they profit those whom they goe about to hurt hurting themselves most Augustin serm de tempor 78. Beside Origen draweth from hence this mysticall sense understanding these two people to be within vs and this strife and combat to be betweene the flesh and the spirit vertue and vice hom 12. in Genes QUEST XXXIV How Iacob was sanctified in his mothers wombe FUrther whereas Iacob strove with Esau in his mothers wombe which was an extraordinary motion and worke of Gods spirit here ariseth a question whether Iacob were sanctified in his mothers wombe which doubt not resolved but onely expounded by Pererius may thus briefly receive satisfaction 1. that first if santification be taken for an actuall and inherent holinesse so neither Iacob nor any other were sanctified but onely Christ in which sense the Angel saith to Marie That holy thing which shall be borne of thee shall be called the sonne of God Luke 1.35 2. There is also a certaine holinesse ascribed to all the children of the faithfull because they are within the covenant 1. Cor. 7. vers 4. whereby they are distinguishâ—d from the seed of unbeleevers Iacob was sanctified otherwise than thus 3. There is a particular sanctification that is a setting apart or preparing of a thing to some speciall use as Paul was separated from his mothers wombe in the purpose of God to preach the Gospell Galath 1.15 Thus also was Iacob sanctified and separated to be the father of the people of God 4. A thing also is said to be sanctified when any extraordinary worke or motion is wrought upon it by the spirit of God as Iohn Baptist was sanctified in his mothers wombe when as at the voice of Maries Salutation the Babe sprung in his mothers belly Luk. 1.44 and thus Iacob also was sanctified and stirred by the spirit to wrestle with his brother not that he had any sense or understanding in fighting against the carnall generation but he was used as an instrument by the spirit to prefigure that state and condition of the people of God which should be resisted and wrestled against by the world QUEST XXXV Esau why so
called Vers. 25. HE that came out first was red c. 1. In that Esau came out red it betokened his bloody disposition in comming forth all hayrie as a beast it shewed his savage and cruell nature Muscull 2. This birth of Esau was extraordinary for children are borne usually with haire only on the head eyelids and eye browes in the other parts it groweth afterward and such hairy conceptions are not without much griefe and trouble causing loathsomenes in the stomacke heart-burning and such like Perer. 3. Hee was called Esau that is already made and perfect of the word gnasah to make which is passively to be taken that he came forth with haire as a perfect man not actively as though he should be active and prompt in his businesse Mercer 4. He had three names Esâ—u because he was compleat Edom of the red pottage and Seir that is haire Perer. QUEST XXXVI Of Iacobs holding Esau by the heâ—le what it signifieth Vers. 26. AFterward came his brother out and his hand hold Esau c. 1. It is not to be supposed that Iacob at the time of the birth as he came forth held Esau by the heele and that one birth immediatly followed another for this had beene against the common course the head of the infant first comming forth and might have put the mother in danger but it is like rather that Iacob before his birth put forth his hand holding his brothers heele which by the mid wife was put into his place againe and then after a while he was borne also and came out orderly with his head first Mercer 2. for so is the usuall and naturall manner for the head of the infant to appeare first to come out footling that is with the feet first is against nature as Nero was borne and hereupon they which were borne with such difficultie had the surname of Agrippa Varro writeth that the infant in the wombe is pitched upon his head with his feet upward as a tree hath the branches uppermost Perer. 3. Hee was called Iacob of gâ—achabh which signifieth to supplant taking it in the proper sense because he held Esau by the heele not in the metaphoricall to deceive as Esau wresteth the word to bring his brother into hatred Genes 27.36 yet this name was a prediction of that which fell out afterward that Iacob should supplant and overthrow his brother Perer. 4. The conceit of Rasi is but weake that Iacob was first conceived in his mothers wombe though Esau were borne first and that therefore the birthright did belong unto him for the right of birthright consisted not in the priority of time but the election of grace 5. Yet this is strange in Iacobs birth as Aben Ezra noteth that Iacob putting forth his hand did breake that rimme or skin wherein the infant is inclosed which did prognosticate that he would breake in upon his brothers birth right QUEST XXXVII Of the divers studie and profession of life in Esau and Iacob Vers. 27. ESau was a cunning hunter c. 1. Hunters and hunting in Scripture are for the most part taken in the worst sense as Nimrod is called a mighty hunter not because this exercise is unlawfull but for that it is more sutable to men of fierce nature Muscul. 2. Otherwise the delight it selfe is lawfull and commendable both profitable to keepe the body in health by moderate exercise as also to prepare and accustome it to labour and make it fit and serviceable for warre Perer. 3. Iacob was a simple man without fraud and lived a quiet life dwelling in tents which the Hebrewes expound of frequenting the tents of Sem and Heber for knowledge but it is a description of those which keepe cattell and follow tents as in this sense Gen. 4.20 Iubal is said to be the father of them that dwell in Tents and of such as have cattell Iun. 4. Esau is said to be a man of the field not as the Latine translateth an husbandman but one continually conversant in the field because of his game a field man as the Septuagint 5. By the lives and dispositions of these two Gregorie noteth the divers studies of worldly men that hunt after the pleasures of this life as Esau did and of holy men that give themselves to the contemplation and studie of vertue with Iacob lib. 5. moral QUEST XXXVIII Why Isaack loved Esau. Vers. 28. ISaack loved Esau c. 1. By this we see that parents are carried with blind affection to fansie those children which are evill conditioned Muscul. 2. But Isaack is not said simply to love Esau but for his venison sake he loved not his evill conditions Cajetan 3. He loved him because he saw him active and well exercised his forward qualities he thought might in time be allayed 4. Some thinke that Esau by his flattery insinuated himselfe and so doe make a metaphor of these words hunting was in his mouth but the other sense is more agreeable Mercer 5. Rebecca loved Iacob not so much thereunto inclined by the oracle received as mooved by the gentle and obedient behaviour of Iacob Mercer QUEST XXXIX Of Iacobs red pottage and Esaus greedie demanding of it Vers. 30. ESau said to Iacob let me eat c. 1. It is but a toy devised here of the Hebrewes that Abraham died this very day when Esau sold his birth-right when he was 15. yeares old lest he should live to see the wicked manners of Esau for upon this day they say Esau killed a man ravished a woman betrothed and Iacob sod lentils they say which used to bee set before those which mourne for the dead thereby conjecturing that he mourned for Abraham But these are uncertaine conceits having no ground in Scripture ex Mercer 2. This was rather the usuall food which Iacob prepared for himselfe for if it had beene common for the whole house Esau might have had otherwise accesse unto it Perer. 3. Esau was very hungry as hunters commonly are and seemed to be very ravenous and unsatiable for 1. he saith feed me or let me swallow at once so the word lagnat signifieth only found in this place as Camels are fed by casting gobbets into their mouth 2. Beside for haste he doubleth the word this red red Mercer 3. He saith he must die if he have it not as men of appetite cannot governe themselves but they must die if their humour be not satisfied Perer. 4. The Hebrewes note that as Esau was red so he delighted in red things in red pottage which beside the rednesse of the lentiles might be coloured with saffron or such like he dwelt also in a red soyle called therefore Idumea c. Mercer 5. Although this may seeme to be but a light matter which passed betweene Esau and Iacob yet considering that they were of discretion to know what they did and Esau was of yeares and strength to follow hunting till hee was wearie Iun. and beside his parents upon this accident
Doe ye the same things unto them Ephes. 6.9 So both superiours and inferiours must discerne what is due to each one in their place and accordingly by the rule of justice measure out unto them Contrary hereunto is partiality and inequality when any doe exact at others hands what is due unto them but are negligent in doing their duty as the Prophet Ezechiel crieth out against those Shepheards which did feed themselves fat but would not feed the flockes againe Ezech. 34.2 2. There is required diligence and sedulity in every one to doe his duty faithfully and studiously whether superiour or inferiour as Rom. 12.7 He that hath an office must wait on his office c. he that distributeth with simplicity he that ruleth with diligence c. Contrary hereunto are 1. Negligence and carelesnesse in men either not to know their duty or knowing it not practising accordingly as the Prophet Zachary crieth out against the foolish shepheard which did not looke for that which was lost c. Zachar. 11.15 16. 2. Hypocrisie in doing of the office rather for praise or commendation than of conscience which S. Paul calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 eye-service Ephes. 6.6 3. Curiosity when one busieth himselfe with anothers office and medleth with things not appertaining unto him against such busie bodies the Apostle speaketh 1. Tim. 6.13 3. Love is commanded both in superiours toward their inferiours and in them againe toward the other Matth. 6.24 This reason is given why one cannot serve two masters because he cannot love them both Contrary hereunto is 1. Want of naturall love which was one of the sinnes of the Heathen Rom. 1. 30. 2. Too much indulgence or foolish affection which winketh at their faults or gratifieth them in things not lawfull and so they one beare with another as the Prophet saith they wrap it up Micah 7.3 4. Mutuall gratitude in acknowledging the benefits mutually received as appeareth in Davids kindnesse toward Mephibosheth for his fathers sake and his thankfulnes againe for the same 2. Sam. 19.29 30. Contrary hereunto is 1. Ingratitude and unthankfulnesse as Saul was unkinde to David who deserved well of him 2. Mutuall gratification in things unlawfull as Ioab served Davids turne in hastening Vrias death 5. Sobernesse and gravity in a moderate respect of our credit and estimation in the world in doing of our duty as the Apostle saith Let every man prove his owne worke and then shall he have rejoycing in himselfe and not in other Galath 6.3 Contrary hereunto are 1. Levity in being carelesse to preserve a good name in the world such the Prophet saith have a whores forehead Ierem. 3.3 which are impudent and shamelesse and blush not at any thing 2. Ambition and vaine glory when one doth their duty for the praise of men as Herod Act. 12. when he apparelled himselfe gorgeously and made an oration to the people 6. Modesty also is requisite that every one consider their owne infirmity neither ascribing too much unto themselves in their doings nor detracting from others as the Apostle saith Galath 6.3 If any seeme to himselfe that he is somewhat when he is nothing he deceiveth himselfe c. Contrary hereunto are 1. Arrogancy and vaine ostentation as Pilate said to our blessed Saviour vaunting of his authority Knowest thou not that I have power to crucifie thee and power to loose thee Ioh. 19.10 2. Dissimulation when one pretendeth modesty in refusing of honours that he may be had in more admiration as Saul that hid himselfe among the stuffe when he was chosen King 1. Sam. 10.22 7. Equity and moderation which is a mutuall toleration of ordinary defects and infirmities both in superiours and inferiours and a mitigating of the rigour in the full exacting of duties as S. Peter giveth this counsell to servants Be subject to your masters with all feare not only to the good and courteous but also to the froward 1. Pet. 2.18 Contrary hereunto are 1. Too much rigour in finding fault and censuring of others which our blessed Saviour reproveth Matth. 7.3 Why seest thou the meat in thy brothers eye and perceivest not the beame in thine owne eye 2. Too much lenity in winking at others faults and not reproving them as time and place requireth as it is in the Psalme 50.18 When thou seest a theefe thou ruinest with him c. as they doe which see and suffer others to sinne and reprove them not 3. Flattery and soothing men up in their sinnes which the Prophet calleth sowing of pillowes under their arme holes Ezech. 13.18 Sic fere Vrsinus 2. Doct. Of honouring of the spirituall parents by giving them due maintenance as by tithes c. HOnour thy father and thy mother c. One speciall part of this honouring is to give reliefe and maintenance as to our naturall parents so also to our spirituall fathers whom Saint Paul would to be had in double honour 1. Tim. 5.17 that is to bee sufficiently maintained and the reason hereof is Servus communitatis debet sustentari à communitate the servant of the comminalty must bee maintained by the comminalty as Saint Paul reasoneth that they which serve at the Altar must live of the Altar Laborant bono publico c. they labour for the publike good and therefore they should bee maintained by the publike good which is performed two wayes either by the common treasure where any such is or by the goods in common of particular persons Tostat. qu. 19. But S. Paul giveth a better reason 1. Cor. 9.11 If we have sowen unto you spirituall things is it a great thing if we reape your carnall They therefore which give grudgingly sparingly and fraudulently toward the maintenance of their Pastour and Teacher and doe withdraw their rights and tithes due unto them doe offend against this Commandement in not honouring their spirituall parents 3. Places of Controversie 1. Confut. Against the Maniches FIrst the Maniches who rejected the old Testament objected that this precept of honouring the parents is contrarie to that in the new Testament where our Saviour said to one that asked leave to goe and bury his father Let the dead bury the dead Luk. 9. Augustine thus answereth 1. If herein the old Testament and the new are contrary then the new herein should be contrary to it selfe for S. Paul also urgeth this Commandement Ephes. 6.2 2. Whereby it is manifest saith he Honorem parentum in gradu suo esse servandum c. That honour in a certaine degree is to be reserved unto parents Eos tamen in divini amoris comparatione c. yet that in comparison of the love of God there is no doubt but they ought to be contemned Cont. Adimant cap. 6. 2. Confut. Against the Anabaptists which deny government SEcondly the Anabaptists are here condemned which deny that it is lawfull for a Christian to be a Magistrate because Christ hath made us free Contra 1. The internall freedome and liberty of the Spirit
doth not take away externall subjection unto Princes as the Apostle saith Art thou called being a servant care not for it 1. Cor. 7.21 As one may be a servant and yet retaine his Christian liberty so he may also be a subject Bucan 2. The Prophet Esay saith Kings shall bee thy nursing fathers Isay 49.23 shewing that even under Christs kingdome there should be beleeving and faithfull Kings Serigius Paulus the Proconsull was converted by S. Paul and yet he was not charged to leave his calling Basting Act. 13. 3. Confut. Against the Papists that would have the Clergy exempt from the authority of the Magistrate THirdly the Romanists are here confuted which doe exempt their Clergy both their persons lands and possessions from the jurisdiction of the Civill Magistrate Concerning the first it is evident by Saint Pauls doctrine in saying Let every soule be subject to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 that none are to be excepted as Chrysostome saith Etiamsi Apostolus fueris etiamsi Evangelista etiamsi Propheta c. Though thou beest an Apostle an Evangelist or Prophet Hom. 23. ad Roman But the Pope and his Clergy are so farre from yeelding due obedience and subjection unto the Civill power that they have usurped authority over Emperours and Kings and commanded them by whom they should have beene commanded Basting Concerning the immunity of the lands and possessions of the Clergy 1. There is no reason but that they which possesse temporall things should also beare the burden imposed upon temporalties and not lay the burden wholly upon others 2. The Apostles rule is generall Tribute to whom tribute custome to whom custome Rom. 13.7 And our Saviour refused not to pay poll money for himselfe and Peter 3. Whereas it is objected that the lands of the Egyptian Priests were free from the payment and tax of the fifth part the reason is because their lands were not sold to Pharaoh as the peoples were as the text it selfe sheweth Except the land of the Priests only which was not Pharaohs Genes 47.25 And the Priests and Levites in Israel were exempted because they possessed no inheritance among their brethren but lived onely of the Offerings 4. Yet it is not denied but that Ecclesiasticall persons may enjoy such immunities and privileges as are bestowed upon them by the liberality of Christian Princes but they are not to challenge them by any Divine right Buâ—an 4. Morall observations upon the fifth Commandement 1. Observ. Of the duty of children to their parents HOnour thy father c. This strait charge of honouring parents reproveth their ingratitude which are sparing in relieving their parents in their age Calvin saith it is detestabilis barbaries a detestable and more than barbarous rudenesse for a childe to neglect his parents a great impiety it is and too usuall in these dayes Oleaster reporteth out of R. Simeon that God doth preferre the honouring of parents before his owne service I will have mercy and not sacrifice and rewardeth it more for those that honour God he honoureth againe but those which honour their parents he rewardeth with long life which is more than honour But this is somewhat too curious indeed honouring of parents is preferred before the ceremoniall part of Gods service which consisted in sacrifices but not before the morall part as it is set forth in the first Table And the honour which God promiseth is more than long life comprehending the glory of this life and the next But yet the Lord commandeth honouring of parents as a speciall duty for the neglect whereof our Saviour reproveth the Pharisies Mark 7. 2. Observ. Of the care of parents toward their children AGaine on the other side parents are to be carefull to provide for their children and to see to their good education not to provide only for their bodily life for so brute beasts doe for their young ones but especially to see that they be brought up in the knowledge of their heavenly Father which duty S. Paul requireth at parents hands Ephes. 6.4 And Solon made a law that the children should not be bound to relieve their Father that had not brought them up in some good trade The sixth Commandement Thou shalt not kill 1. The questions discussed QUEST I. Why this precept is set before the other that follow 1. AS the former Commandement exacteth and requireth to doe good and to performe our duty unto man so these following concerne our innocency in doing of no hurt unto our neighbours and brethren Pelarg. Lyran. 2. And they are propounded negatively Quia negativa sunt majoris obligationis gravioris transgressionis because negatives doe bind more strongly and the transgression is more grievous for it is a greater sinne to doe evill than not to doe good Tostat. quaest 21. 3. There are two rules and Canons in Scripture upon the which these precepts of the second Table depend the one is Quod tibi fieri non vis alteri ne feceris That which thou wouldest not be done unto thee doe not to another Hic canon omnes tollit injurias This rule taketh away all injuries and wrongs the other is Whatsoever you would that men should doe unto you even so doe you to them Matth. 7.12 Hic canon ad omnem similiter nos cohortatur beneficentiam This rule likewise doth exhort us to all beneficence and doing of good Procopius 4. Now whereas injury is done three wayes unto our neighbour Perversitate operis falsitate sermonis improbitate voluntatis by the perversenesse of the deed falsenesse of speech and badnesse of the minde and the perversenesse of the deed is either offred to ones person or substance and his person is two wayes considered as it is simplex his single person or conjuncta his coupled person in his wife therefore these three Commandements which forbid murder adultery theft are set first Pelarg. 5. And because the greatest hurt which can bee done unto a man is touching his life Quia mors tollit esse simpliciter because death taketh away a mans being simply as other wrongs doe not therefore this precept is set before the other as forbidding the greatest wrong Tostat. QUEST II. Whether it be here forbidden to slay any beasts THou shalt not kill Some have imagined that all kinde of killing is here forbidden yea even of brute beasts But this foolish opinion may be diversly confuted 1. Augustine thus reasoneth If it be not lawfull to slay beasts Cur non etiam herbas why also is it not unlawfull to pull up herbes and plants which although they have no sense yet they are said to live and so also may dye as the Apostle saith That which thou sowest is not quickned except it dye 1. Cor. 15.36 And this indeed was the mad opinion of the Maniches that thought it unlawfull to pull up a plant If then this Thou shalt not kill be not meant of plants because they have no sense then neither is it understood of brute beasts