he hath not Can ungodly men that are not gracious themselves be good stewards of the manifold Grace of God Good stewardship of what of God's abounding Grace which is the Ability and Stewardship received And therefore in the following verses he makes an Exclusive limitation of such as are not thus furnished saying If any man speak let him speak as the Oracles of God and if any man Minister let him do it as of the Ability that God giveth which is as much as if he had said They that cannot thus speak and thus Minister ought not to do it for this If denotes a necessary Condition Now what this Ability is is manifest by the former words to wit the Gift received and the Grace whereof they are Stewards as by the immediate Context and dependency of the words doth appear neither can it be understood of a meer Natural Ability because man in this condition is said not to know the things of God and so he cannot Minister them to others And the following words shew this also in that he immediately subjoineth That God in all things may be glorified but surely God is not glorified but greatly dishonoured when Natural Men from their meer natural Ability meddle in Spiritual things which they neither know nor understand Fourthly That Grace is a most Necessary Qualification for a Minister Proof IV appears by these Qualifications which the Apostle expresly requires 1 Tim 3.2 Tit. 1. c. where he saith A Bishop must be blameless vigilant sober of good behaviour apt to teach patient a lover of good men just holy temperate as the steward of God holding fast the faithful Word as he hath been taught Upon the other hand He must neither be given to wine nor a striker nor covetous nor proud nor self-willed nor soon angry Now I ask If it be not Impossible that a man can have all these above-named Vertues How can a Bishop have these Vertues without the Grace of God and be free of all these Evils without the Grace of God If then these Vertues for the producing of which in a man Grace is absolutely necessary be necessary to make a true Minister of the Church of Christ according to the Apostles judgment surely Grace must be necessary also Concerning this thing a Learned Man and well-skilled in Antiquity about the time of the Reformation writeth thus * Whatsoever is done in the Church without the Ministry of God's Spirit is vain and wicked Whatsoever is done in the Church either for Ornament or Edification of Religion whether in chusing Magistrates or instituting Ministers of the Church except it be done by the Ministry of God's Spirit which is as it were the Soul of the Church it is vain and wicked For whoever hath not been called by the Spirit of God to the great Office of God and Dignity of Apostleship as Aaron was and hath not entred in by the door which is Christ but hath otherways risen in the Church by the Window by the favours of men c. truly such a one is not the Vicar of Christ and the Apostles but a Thief and a Robber and the Vicar of Judas Iscariot †Who is Judas Iscariot's Vicar and Simon the Samaritan Hence it was so strictly appointed concerning the Election of Prelates which holy Dionysius calls the Sacrament of Nomination that the Bishops and Apostles who should Oversee the service of the Church should be men of most intire manners and life powerful in sound doctrine to give a reason for all things So also * Franciscus Lambertus Avenionensis in his Book concerning Prophecy Learning Tongues and the Spirit of Prophecy Argentorat excus anno 1516 de prov cap 24. another about the same time writeth thus Therefore it can never be that by the Tongues or Learning any can give a sound Judgment concerning the Holy Scriptures and the Truth of God Lastly saith he the sheep of Christ seek nothing but the voice of Christ which he knoweth by the holy Spirit wherewith he is filled he regards not Learning Tongues or any outward thing so as therefore to believe this or that to be the Voice of Christ his true shepherd he knoweth that there is need of no other thing but the Testimony of the Spirit of God Object 1 § XVII Against this Absolute Necessity of Grace they Object That if all Ministers had the Saving Grace of God then all Ministers should be Saved seeing none can fall away from or lose Saving Grace Answ. But this Objection is built upon a false Hypothesis purely denied by us and we have in the former Proposition concerning Perseverance already Refuted it Object 2 Secondly It may be objected to us That since we affirm that every man hath a measure of True and Saving Grace there needs no singular Qualification neither to a Christian nor Minister for seeing every man hath this Grace then no man needs forbear to be a Minister for want of Grace Answ. I answer We have above shewn that there is Necessary to the making a Minister a special and particular Call from the Spirit of God which is something besides the Vniversal Dispensation of Grace to all according to that of the Apostle Hebr. 5.4 No man taketh this honour unto himself but he that is Called of God as was Aaron Moreover we understand by Grace as a Qualification to a Minister All have God's Grace which calls to Righteousness but all are not so leaven'd in its Nature to bring forth fruits a blameless holy life not the meer measure of Light as it is given to Reprove and Call him to Righteousness but we understand Grace as it hath Converted the Soul and Operateth powerfully in it as hereafter concerning the Work of Ministers will further appear So we understand not men simply as having Grace in them as a Seed which we indeed affirm all have in a measure but we understand men that are gracious leavened by it into the Nature thereof so as thereby to bring forth these good fruits of a blameless Conversation and of Justice holiness patience and temperance which the Apostle requires as Necessary in a true Christian Bishop and Minister Object 3 Secondly They ‖ So Nic. Arnoldus sect 32. upon These 4. object the Example of the false Prophets of the Pharisees and of Judas But first As to the false Prophets there can nothing be more foolish and ridiculous as if because there were false Prophets truly false without the Grace of God therefore Grace is not necessary to a true Christian Minister Answ. Indeed if they had proved that true Prophets wanted this Grace The false not the true Prophets want the Grace of God they had said something but what have false Prophets common with true Ministers but that they pretend falsly that which they have not And because false Prophets want true Grace will it therefore follow that true Prophets ought not to have it that they may be true
any but that those Vertues are not in many of the Persons expressed by the Titles they bear neither will they allow to speak so to such in whom these Vertues are unless they be so dignified by outward Princes So that such as are truly Vertuous must not be styled by their Vertues because not priviledged by the Princes of this World and such as have them not must be so called because they have obtained a Patent so to be and all this is done by those who pretend to be his Followers that commanded his Disciples Not to call any Man Master and told them such could not believe as received Honour one from another and sought not the Honour which cometh from God only This is so plain to such as will indeed be Christians that it needs no Consequence Your Holiness Your Grace c. Fourthly As to those Titles of Holiness Eminency and Excellency used among the Papists to the Pope and Cardinals c. and Grace Lordship and Worship used to the Clergy among the Protestants it is a most blasphemous Usurpation For if they use Holiness and Grace because these things ought to be in a Pope or in a Bishop how come they to usurp that peculiarly to themselves Ought not Holiness and Grace to be in every Christian And so every Christian should say Your Holiness and Your Grace one to another Next how can they in Reason claim any more Titles than were practised and received by the Apostles and Primitive Christians whose Successors they pretend they are and as whose Successors and no otherwise themselves I judge will confess any Honour they seek is due to them Now if they neither sought received nor admitted such Honour nor Titles how came these by them If they say They did let them prove it if they can We find no such thing in the Scripture The Christians speak to the Apostles without any such Denominations neither saying If it please Your Grace Hypocrites want Titles Your Holiness Your Lordship nor Your Worship they are neither called My Lord Peter nor My Lord Paul nor yet Master Peter nor Master Paul nor Doctor Peter nor Doctor Paul but singly Peter and Paul and that not only in the Scripture but for some hundreds of Years after So that this appears to be a manifest Fruit of the Apostasy For if these Titles arise either from the Office or Worth of the Persons it will not be denied but the Apostles deserved them better than any now that call for them But the Case is plain the Apostles had the Holiness the Excellency the Grace and because they were Holy Excellent and Gracious they neither used nor admitted of such Titles But these having neither Holiness Excellency nor Grace will needs be so called to satisfy their Ambitious and Ostentive Minds which is a manifest Token of their Hypocrisy Fifthly as to that Title of Majesty usually ascribed to Princes we do not find it given to any such in the Holy Scripture but that it is specially and peculiarly ascribed unto God as 1 Chron. 29.11 Job 37.22 Psal. 21.5.29.4.43.3.63.1.96.6 Isa. 2.10.24.14.26.10 Heb. 1.3 2 Pet. 1.16 and many more Places Hence saith Jude ver 25. To the only wise God our Saviour be Glory and Majesty c. not to Men We find in Scripture the proud King Nebuchadnezar assuming this Title to himself Dan. 4.30 who at that Time received a sufficient Reproof by a sudden Judgment which came upon him Therefore in all the Compellations used to Princes in the Old Testament it is not to be found nor yet in the New Paul was very civil to Agrippa yet he gives him no such Title Neither was this Title used among Christians in the Primitive Times Hence the Ecclesiastical History of the Reformation of France relating the Speech of the Lord Rochefort at the Assembly of the Estate of France held under Charles the Ninth in the Year 1560 saith That this Harangue was well remarked in that he used not the Word Majesty invented by Flatterers of late Years And yet this Author minded not how his Master Calvin used this flattering Title to Francis the First King of France Eccles. hist. lib. 4. p. 445. Your Majesty not used How taken notice of in 1560. and not only so but calls him Most-Christian King in the Epistle to his Institutions though by his daily persecuting of the Reformers it was apparent he was far from being such even in Calvin's own Esteem Surely the complying with such vain Titles imposed and introduced by Antichrist greatly tended to stain the Reformation and to render it defective in many things Lastly All these Titles and Styles of Honour are to be rejected by Christians because they are to seek the Honour that comes from above and not the Honour that is from below But these Honours are not that Honour that comes from above but are from below The Proud Mind loves Titles For we know well enough what Industry and what Pains Men are at to get these Things and what part it is that seeks after them to wit the Proud Insolent Haughty Aspiring Mind For judge Is it the Meek and Innocent Spirit of Christ that covets that Honour Is it that Spirit that must be of no Reputation in this World that has its Conversation in Heaven Phil. 3.20 that comes to have Fellowship with the Sons of God Is it that Spirit I say that loves that Honour that seeks after that Honour that pleads for the upholding of that Honour that frets and rages and fumes when it is denied that Honour Or is it not rather the Lordly insulting Spirit of Lucifer Lucifer's Spirit the Prince of this World he that of old affected and sought after this Honour and loved not to abide in the Submissive Low Place And so all his Children are possessed with the same ambitious proud Mind seeking and coveting Titles of Honour which indeed belong not to them For let us examine Who are they 1 Sam. 2.30 that are Honourable indeed Is it not the Righteous Man Is it not the Holy Man Is it not the humble-hearted Man the meek spirited Man And are not such those that ought to be honoured among Christians Now of these may there not be Poor Men Labourers silly Fishermen And if so how comes it that the Titles of Honour are not bestowed upon such But who are they that generally receive and look for this Honour Are they not the Rich ones such as have abundance of the Earth as be like the Rich Glutton such as are proud and ambitious such as are Oppressors of the Poor such as swell with Lust and Vanity and all superfluity of Naughtiness Who are the very Abomination and Plague of the Nations are not these they that are accounted the Honourable that require and receive the Titles of Honour proud Hamans Now whether is this the Honour that comes from God or the Honour from below Doth God honour such as daily dishonour him
and disobey him And if this be not the Honour that comes from God but the Honour of this World which the Children of this World give and receive one from another How can the Children of God such as are Christians indeed give or receive that Honour among themselves Hieron in his Epistle to Celant admonisheth her That she was to be preferred to none for her Nobibity for the Christian Religion admits not of respect of Persons neither are Men to be esteemed because of their outward condition but according to the Disposition of the Mind to be esteemed either Noble or â—ase he that obeyeth not sin is free who is strong in Vertue is Noble Let the Epistle of James be read without coming under the Reproof of Christ who saith That such as do so cannot believe But further if we respect the Cause that most frequently procures to Men these Titles of Honour there is not one of a thousand that shall be found to be because of any Christian Vertue but rather for things to be discommended among Christians As by the Favour of Princes procured by Flattering and often by worse Means Yea the most frequent and accounted among Men most-Honourable is Fighting or some great Martial Exploit which can add nothing to a Christian's Worth Since sure it is it were desirable there were no Fightings among Christians at all and in so far as there are it shews they are not right Christians And James tells us That All fighting proceeds from the lusts so that it were fitter for Christians by the Sword of God's Spirit to fight against their Lusts than by the Prevalency of their Lusts to destroy one another Whatever Honour any might have attained of old under the Law this way we find under the Gospel Christians commended for Suffering not for Fighting neither did any of Christ's Disciples save one offer outward Violence by the Sword in cutting off Malchus's Ear for which he received no Title of Honour but a just Reproof Finally if we look either to the Nature of this Honour the Cause of it the Way it 's conveyed the Terms in which it is delivered it cannot be used by such as mind to be Christians in good earnest § IV. Now besides these general Titles of Honour what gross Abuses are crept in among such as are called Christians in the use of Complements wherein not Servants to Masters or others with respect to any such kind of Relations do say and write to one another at every turn Your humble Servant Your most obedient Servant Lying accounted Civility c. Such wicked Customes have to the great Prejudice of Souls accustomed Christians to Lie and to use Lying is now come to be accounted Civility O horrid Apostasy For it is notoriously known that the Use of these Complements imports not any Design of Service neither are any such Fools as to think so for if we should put them to it that say so they would not doubt to think we abused them and would let us know they gave us Wordâ— in Course and no more It is strange that such as pretend to Scripture as their Rule should not be ashamed to use such things since Elihu that had not the Scriptures would by the Light within him which these Men think insufficient say Job 32.21 22. Let me not accept any mans person neither let me give flattering Titles unto man For I know not to give flattering Titles In so doing my Maker would soon take me away * This History is reported by Casaubonus in his Book of Manners and Customs pag. 169. In this last Age he is esteemed an uncivil Man who will not either to his Inferior or Equal subscribe himself Servant But Sulpitius Severus was heretofore sharply reproved by Paulinus Bishop of Nola because in his Epistle he had subscribed himself his Servant saying Beware thou subscribe not thy self his Servant who is thy Brother for Flattery is sinful not a Testimony of Humility to give their Honours to Men which are only due to the One Lord Master and GOD. A certain antient devout Man in the Primitive Time subscribed himself to a Bishop Your humble Servant wherein I doubt not but he was more real than our usual Complementers and yet he was sharply reproved for it But they usually Object to defend themselves That Luke saith Most excellent Theophilus and Paul Most noble Festus I Answer Since Luke wrote that by the Dictates of the infallible Spirit of God I think it will not be doubted but Theophilus did deserve it as being really endued with that Vertue Concerning the Title Paul gave to Festus In which Case we shall not condemn those that do it by the same Rule But it is not proved that Luke gave Theophilus this Title as that which was inherent to him either by his Father or by any Patent Theophilus had obtained from any of the Princes of the Earth or that he would have given it him in case he had not been truly Excellent And without this be proved which never can there can nothing hence be deduced against us The like may be said of that of Paul to Festus whom he would not have called such if he had not been truly Noble as indeed he was in that he suffered him to be heard in his own Cause and would not give way to the Fury of the Jews against him it was not because of any outward Title bestowed upon Festus that he so called him else he would have given the same Compellation to his Predecessor Felix who had the same Office but being a covetous Man we find he gives him no such Style § V. It will not be unfit in this Place The Singular Number to one Person used in the Latin to say something concerning the using of the singular Number to one Person of this there is no Controversy in the Latin For when we speak to one we always use the Pronoun TU and he that would do otherwise would break the Rules of Grammar For what Boy learning his Rudiments is ignorant that it is incongruous to say vos amas vos legis that is you lovest you readest speaking to one But the Pride of Man that hath corrupted many things refuses also to use this simplicity of speaking in the Vulgar Languages For being puffed up with a vain Opinion of themselves as if the Singular Number were not sufficient to them they will have others to speak to them in the Plural Hence Luther in his Plays reproves and mocks this manner of speaking saying Magister vos es iratus Which Corruption Erasmus sufficiently refutes in his Colloquies Concerning which likewise James Howel in his Epistle to the Nobility of England before the French and English Dictionary takes notice That both in France and in other Nations the Word THOU was used in speaking to one but by success of Time when the Roman Commonwealth grew into an Empire the Courtiers began to magnify the Emperour as being
Fire and outward Light of the Sun as a certain Preacher said 357. it may be resisted 331 333 338 398 399. by this Light or Seed Grace and Word of God he invites all and calls them to Salvation 352 354 none of those to whom the History of Christ is preached are saved but by the inward Operation of this Light 353 355. it is small in the first manifestation but it groweth 353. it is slighted by the Calvinists Papists Socinians and Arminians and why 354. none can put it to silence 357. there are and may be saved by the operation thereof who are ignorant of the History of Christ 318 319 331 336 337 352 356 362. an answer to the Objection That none can be saved but in the Name of Jesus Christ 358 359 367. The Light within being believed in and obeyed leads to the use of the Scriptures 11. where the Light is there is Christ himself ibid. 63. the Light is not contradistinguished from the Gospel but is the same 64 some may have saving Light and Grace who after a certain manner may be said not to have the Spirit 66 The Light of Jesus Christ in Men will discover the Intents of the heart and flatter none 711. the Light is no Introduction to paganism 67. concerning the Light 123. the Light is come into the World c. 126 165. Light of Nature objected 693. The Light seed and Grace of God no part of Man's Nature 694. the Inward Principle of Life and Light described 699. Deaf People c. the Light may Influence which Writings c. cannot 759 805 302. Objections against the Universality of the Light 797 798. 't is sufficient and saving ibid. 't is not nature's Light 829. the Testimony of Cyrill Alex. of the Light 344 Life The Principle of Divine Life is never Idle 644. the Life of Words witnessed ibid. see Christ no Nourishment no Life 414. Lifeless Members what Church they make ibid. Literature Humane Literature is not at all needful 421 c. see Minister Sciences Liturgy 444 455. Logick 423 424. ‑ Aristotle's â—ogick by Papists and Protestants made the Hand-maid of Divinity so called 305 Lord There is one Lord 279 280. No Man can call Jesus Lord c. 276 468. the Name of the Lord how taken in Scripture 487 Lot Abraham's and Lot's bowing 874 Love Of a Love-Feast 509 510 679 694 704 Lucifer Lucifer's Spirit affecting honour 537 538 Lukewarmness of the Church of Laodicea 411. see Church Religion Luther 526. Luther and Calvin testifying against Persecution persecute themselves thereby encouraging Papists 526 527. Lutherans their Seditions against Reformed Teachers and Assault c. 292. their Principle of Persecution c. 690. they hold no Salvation without the Knowledge of Christ and the Scriptures 692 M. Macquare R. M's most abusive Railing against the Quakers and their Doctrine 880. and his shameless Flatteries to J. B. ibid. Magistrate Concerning his Power in-things purely Religious and that he hath no Authority over the Conscience 515 530. nor ought he to punish according to Church-Censure 517. concerning the present Magistrates of the Christian Word 563 564. Magistracy and the Offices thereof 157 159 171. is an Ordinance of God 710. its Lawfulness and Power 865. he bears not the Sword in vain 665. not to punish for Religious Matters but Evil in Civil Matters ibid. Priests call for the Magistrates Sword to defend their Doctrine against the Quakers 76 they make him their Executioner 667. Christ's Kingdom needs not outward Power to protect it 846. the Nature of the Gospel is Extrinsick from the Rule and Government of State 517. if Magistrates have Power to punish Hereticks then Nero was no Persecutor 521. then forcing a Conformity is not Compelling the Conscience as J. B. Asserts 865. see Heresies Mahomet prohibited all Reason and Discourse about Religion 527. he was an Impostor 338. Majesty your Majesty see Titles ‑ excellent Majesty 875 Maintenance Minister's Maintenance 142. must be voluntary not coercive ibid. 143. the Gospel to be made without Charge 168 434. his necessities to be answered 432 661. God sends no Man away faring upon his own Charges 435. the Abuses Priests Maintenance brings 436. in the Primitive Times no stinted Maintenance was sought by the Ministers ibid. who hire a Teacher may pay his Stipend 438. what kind of Maintenance is denied 661 662. what Maintenance allowed to Ministers in Scripture 840. Malchus his Ear cut off see Titles Man see Knowledge his Spirit knoweth the things of a Man and not the things of God 275. the Carnal Man esteemeth the Gospel-Truths as Lies 276. and in that State he cannot please God 282. the New Man and the Old 294 593. the Natural Man cannot discern Spiritual Things As to the First Adam he is Fallen and Degenerate 294 308 310 317 318. his Thoughts of God and Divine Things in the Corrupt State are Evil and Unprofitable 310. nothing of Adam's Sin is Imputed to him until by Evil-doing he Commit his own 311 315 316. in the Corrupt State he hath no Will or Light capable of it self to manifest Spiritual things 311 314 367. he cannot when he will procure to himself Tenderness of Heart 389. whatsoever he doth while he doth it not by in and through the Power of God he is not approved of God 452 453. how the inward Man is nourished 495 497. how his Vnderstanding cannot be forced by Sufferings and how his Vnderstanding is changed 521 522. the Heart of Man is deceitful 301 312. his Imaginations evil ibid. the Natural Man discerns not c. 313. the Fall of Man did affect both Soul and Body 762. how Man's Mind is changed 522 Manifestation see Seed Marchandize what it is to make Marchandize with the Scriptures 426 Marriages the Care taken about them by the People called Quakers 210 211. Martyrs of Protestant Martyrs 523 528 J. B's condemning Primitive Martyrs falsly as led by a Spirit of Error 736. Mass 441 448 454 474. ‑ the Popish Mass and Vespers 443. see Papists Mathematician 293 294 Meats and Drinks the Law was Meats and Drinks not so the Gospel 512. the observing of Meats Drinks Washings to be considered in a threefold respect 586. Mechanicks 431. they contributed much to the Reformation 432 Mediator see Christ. Meditation the Quakers are not against it 452 Meetings to have set Meetings to the Glory of God and the Good of the Church in their proper Times and Seasons doth not contradict the being led Immediately by the Spirit of God 204 235. Meetings to take Care for the Poor Widows and Orphans c. 206. the necessity of Meetings set Times and Places 442. Assemblies of Worship in publick described 444. Silent Meetings 445. a secret Travel in Silent Meetings 446. speaking to Edification in Meetings 446. the mocker in Meetings ibid. our Work and Worship in our Meetings 447. a sweet Sound of Thanksgiving and Praise in our Meetings 448. set Times and Places and the Use and