Selected quad for the lemma: soul_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
soul_n	body_n	union_n	unite_v	7,351	5	9.9154	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A18903	A true and admirable historie, of a mayden of Confolens, in the prouince of Poictiers that for the space of three yeeres and more hath liued, and yet doth, vvithout receiuing either meate or drinke. Of whom, his Maiestie in person hath had the view, and, (by his commaund) his best and chiefest phisitians, haue tryed all meanes, to find, whether this fast & abstinence be by deceit or no. In this historie is also discoursed, whether a man may liue many dayes, moneths or yeeres, without receiuing any sustenance. Published by the Kings especiall priuiledge.; Abstinens Confolentanea. English	Citois, François, 1572-1652.; Munday, Anthony, 1553-1633.; Coeffeteau, Nicolas, 1574-1623, attributed name.	1603 (1603)	STC 5326; ESTC S118585	35,171	122

comes to yeeld it selfe vnder the tirannie of one alone giues therby reasonably to vnderstand that the course of life keeps it selfe for so long time as naturall heat dooth aboundantly disperse it selfe with the radicall humour and that the elementarie qualities doe hold a good simpathie among them selues in their harmony kind accord which wee call temperature And therefore it is blamelesse to define life by these two causes that is to say heat and temperature because it behooueth to take the definition by the cause which is most neere Now heat is the most neere instrument of the soule the temper next that of naturall heat which disposeth and accommodates it to diuers actions Then this causall definition is well deriued from the chiefe and principall occasion of life which heere wee haue alleaged by the authoritic of Aristotle Neuerthelesse Haruet goes after another fashion he defines the life of man to be an action of the reasonable soule produced into the bodie of man but this definition is not subtile enough For first formost life is no action at all of the soule otherwise it should be the soule that liueth and not the body but life is an abiding as hath bin said or an vnion of the soule with the body according as Aristotle describeth in another of his bookes wherof soone 8. Metaph. after proceedeth action Heere I add that the actions of life beeing to vnderstand to smell to mooue and to nourish if life be an action then it were an action of an action which is most absurd Or els if life be an action of the reasonable soule in so much then as shee is reasonable the corporal parts should then be driuen to performe they● operations as receiuing foode for nourishment to beget her like onely by reason and the intellect not by any naturall sence But peraduenture Haruet hauing drawn his definition from others hath read that life is an act of the reasonable soule which word of act he hath conuerted into action Or act is that which the Greeks call E●telecheia which is a perfection efficacie and moouing power of it selfe far enough differing from that which they call Ergon And so one may to some purpose define life an act of the soule in the body that is to say a power vertue of the soule by the vnion thereof with the body VVhence is casie to be vnderstood that taking life generally it should rather be imputed to naturall heat as to the organe of the soule then vnto reason in case notwithstanding that this heat still abides alwaies vnited with the radicall moisture which although that day by day it be consumed by this heate yet neuerthelesse nature prouideth a subrogation daily of new which she borrows from the nouritures we receiue as it hath bin said already heeretofore But Haruet imagineth that these nourishments serue yet to another vse which is saith he to relieue fortifie the spirits the which I●ubert hath omitted as if vnder this name of radicall moisture we should comprehend onely moisture by it selfe not the spirits likewise And what is he who will denie that the spirits are not restored strengthened both by eating and drinking Yee haue in very truth great store of things heere chawed and eaten vnprofitably and to little purpose And of abounding that vvhich he proposeth against Hippocrates in the 14. Aphorisme of his 2. Booke is altogether paradoxicall to wit that hee in whom heate is most languishing hath the more neede of nourishment which hee proues by the example of a forty-yeeres aged man who saith he receiueth more food then any infant of two or three dayes in whom notwithstanding there is an aduantage of this heat according to Hippocrates himselfe Behold in my iudgement an argument very feeble if one should bring in all that he failes in if also we should oppose the organs of the twaine the one against the other For to the end that vnder this word Infant no cauillation may be couered I call all them Infants which are vnder 14. yeeres of age in the same maner as the Greekes do vnderstand this word Paidi● They I say that according to the proportion of their maw or little belly doe take more foode then men of middle perfect age as well by reason of the power of the facultie which seethes or boiles the foode whence proceedeth a speedie riddance thereof as by their frequent exercises during the which time good store of their substance glides it selfe thorow the pores into the skinne to the end I may be silent also in the two necessities alleaged by Hippocrates that infants haue of eating to wit for nourishing to giue encreasing to the bodie Now the strength of the facultie which boiles the meate in our stomack depends much vppon temperature and moderation but that is when it is excited and prouoked on by the heat natural which although that after one food is digested shee introduceth not then of herselfe any other nouriture as saith Haruet neuerthelesse because that this first is thus digested by heate there growes incontinently a feeling of penurie and want of foode at the mouth of the ventricle which we call hunger For this cause Ioubert referres only to heate as the principall agent the quantitie of those foodes which we take immediatly after and they are ruled by the appetite of hunger The facilitie of supporting Com. 2. Apho. 13. hunger saith Galen makes it selfe knowne thus when any one hath no appetite at all and yet neuerthelesse he feeles no endamagement or defect VVhich Haruet thus brings in that such as are restored from sicknesse haue a good appetite and yet notwithstanding no such meates are then giuen them as their appetite doth desire but when aduise is giuen for restoring of the powers it beho●es also to haue regard to the 〈…〉 of the naturall heate 〈…〉 is not to be any way iniuried but still supported This is thus done because that the temperature beeing not yet thorowlie reseated the naturall faculties feele themselues as yet to be diseased the organes cannot boile the foodes receiued in too great a quantity Now Ioubert in his demonstration purposed to speake of the healthfull not of the sick or else of them which are neither And therefore he concluds that olde men haue not need of meate often because they doo not desire or appetite often principally considering that they haue colde bodies whereto Haruet in no wise will agree for he saith that all the action of mixed bodies comes from the qualitie which winnes the vpper hand in the assembling of the elements So is it in liuing bodies heate ruleth ouer the other qualities of which heate all action hath his originall and not of colde I willingly admit the proposition with Aristotle so farre foorth as to mixte things inanimate or without soule which know the simple formes of the elements for their principles But in animate bodies hauing soules which haue a forme

son cours N' Aesculape son fils car si c'est maladie Le defaut d' alimens eut son ame rauie Mais sans boire manger celuy cy vit tousiours Viure ainsi n'est ce pas vn prodige bien rare Ce viure dementant la Nature ses lois Qui veulent qu'à momens nostre corps se repare Mass vn effect plus beau faict ton liure Citoys Repa●ssant nos esprits d'vn si precieus viure Qu'il fournit d' alimens pour en mourant reuiur● FIN The French Sonnet thus Englished A Miracle begets thy rich discourse Disputing If consumption doe ensue On want of feeding Or if lifes right due Be in a body life-lesse-liuing Since t is true Foode is the soule which dooth support lifes course ●●oebus nere saw the like in all his race Nor yet his Phisick Sonne for in disease Life fayles if nourishment doe not appease Yet without meate or drinke life heere holds place Ist not a wonder then one thus should liue Nature heere takes the lie and those decrees That euery moment as the bellies fees Bids fill the gut or else our health we leese Citoys to vs a further rule doth giue Feeding our spirits with a precious food Maintayning life in death more pure more good FINIS PEllegis hoc scriptum suffundere lurco rubor● Ni subis infensi pallidus ora Dei Ah tum te miserum iudex cúm venerit ille● Viuere neglectis qu●m potes vsque cibis I. MOR●AV O● LE MESME ROugiventre glouton à l' abord de ce liur● Si tu ne veux pallir au iugement de Dieu Que feras tu chetif en ce terrible lieu Puss qu'on peut icy has long temps viure sans viure● ❀ The French thus Englished BLush belly-glutton to behold this booke Gods iudgements if they here thee not affright vvhat wilt thou do wretch in more dreadful plight On one long liuing foodlesse thou maist looke FINIS LE MESME I Ecroyois en la foy d'vn erreur populaire Que de ce corps mortel le foible bastiment Priuè du fort soustien d'vn solide aliment Caduc en peu de temps viendroit à se deffaire Mais le nouueau lab●ur de tes doctes escrits Plein de l'air animé d' vne belle parole Qui preuue le contraire m'enuoye â l'escol● Du choc de ses raisons estonna mes esprits Puis le naïf raport d'vne recente histoire Con●it an doux nectar de ton mielleux discours Puissant de me nourrir sans manger plusieurs iours Renuersant ma creance establit ta victoire FIN The same French Sonnet thus Englished A Populare errour long time me misse-led That the weake building of this bodies frame Robd of foodes strong support would shrinke the same And in short while deliuer it for dead But this fresh labour of thy flowing wit Full of the soule-breath of most pleasing words Approues the contrary and to me affords Schoole-p●ines againe so powerfull is thy writ A ●ecent History so sprightly told Sweetned with Nectar of thy honny-phrase Foodlesse ●eedes me for many many dayes And now to change h●leefe I may be bold FINIS HI● liber hu●●ns d●m tollit corporis escam Ingenio dulc●ns quis neget esse cibum Pasch Le Coq M. D. FOelix hoc praeco●e tuae virguncula vita I am non to siccus succus vt ante ●ouet Ipse sed aternam vitam dat accipit autor Incertum tu illi an debeat ille tibi A. CITOYS Frater in Curia Patronus LE MESME VNE humeur dans ce corps estroictement enclose Depuis vn si long temps ceste fille entretient Vne meilleure vie en ce liure luy vient Car ce liure la vie est vne mesme chose F J N. The French thus Englished AN humour in the body strictly closde Hath so long time this Maydens life supplyed A better life this booke hath her proposde For this booke and her life are neere allyed FINIS ❧ A MONSIEVR LESCARBOT SVR LA TRADVCTION DE cette histoire L'Autheur qui premier a enfanté cette histoire Sembloit auoir au peuple en●ié ce bonheur De cogno●stre scanoir par son docte labeur Ce prodige nouueau d'immortelle memoire Toy Lescarbot emeu non d'vne vaine gloire Ma●s d'vne affection digne d'vn noble coeur As supple ' au defaut de ce premier autheur Rendant son noble escrit à tous Francois notoire Si le nom de Citoys merite estre immortel Pour a●oir aus h●mains descouuert des mer●●illes Qui leur vont rauissant l'esprit les oreilles Ton nom certamement merite d'estre tel Qui par ton bean discours fais que la mesme chose Ore est commune à ce●s à qui elle estoit close I. DE LA ROQVE To Monsieur Lescarbot vpon the traducing of this history ⸫ THE Authour that first infanted this Booke Seem'd enuious of the peoples happines Loth that in his learnd labour they might looke On matter of such wondrous worthines Yet thou Lescarbot moou'd by no vaine-glory But in th' affection of a noble mind The first mans fault hast quitted in true kind And made all Fraunce acquainted with the story If Citoys name immortally deserue For opening such a meruaile to vs men As both their cares mindes may sweetly serue They name as worthily may merit then Thy queint discourse imparts the selfe same right In common now which he kept out of sight FINIS To his good friend A M. WOnder bee dumb And now no more prefer Like to some selfe lou'd boasting Trauailer Thy past Aduentures for an Age is borne Vpon whose forhead caracters are worne So strangely that ee'ne Admiration stands Amazde to read them with ●eau'd eyes and hands Times oldest Chronicle proues it most cleere England neere spent such a miraculous ye●re And Fraunce thy maiden child-birth goes by far Beyond all those bred in thy ciuill warre The wonder being by thus much greater growne Last day she spake no language but her owne Yet now shee 's vnderstood by Englishmen Such Magick waites deere friend vpon thy pen. Tho. Dekker ¶ A true and meruailous Historie of a Maiden of Poictou who for the space of three yeeres and more hath liued without either meate or drinke EVripides desired that either wee might line as dumbe in perpetuall silence or that dumbe thinges vvithout any ambiguitie of words might speake to vs. As for my selfe I could wish that either we were of those Indian people called Astomi whom Plinie Lib. 7. cap. 1. describeth to liue without mouthes or else contented like them with the sole benefit of ayre without eating or drinking wee might heere spend our time For by this meanes it might come to passe that our spirit which with a firme eye cannot cōtemplate things naturall no more then the Owle looke on the rayes

of of the Sun beeing freed from those mistes thicke vapours occasioned by the vse of meats would comprehend with a perfect regard the Ideas and formes of things nakedlie and according as they are indeede Heracl Chrisippus then should not neede to take Helleborus with such obseruāce for the purging of his vnderstanding to the end he might the more subtilly see the strength of his arguments Our soule against her nature would be no heauie burden at all vnto vs shee should not neede to serue herselfe with the salt of our bodies to keepe her from corrupting but rather shee would be like vnto a Phar●s which in our diuine nauigation would discouer the way for our attayning to the land of heauen But in regard that our life is maintained by the nourishing of the bodie and that by one mutuall assistance both together doe conserue thēselues euen while we our selues doe studie how to support this life by continuall care for furnishing it with ●oodes it ensueth that wee altogether abase cast downe to the earth that part of the soule which otherwise of her selfe would couet nothing els then to eleuate her selfe to high and heauenly things Notwithstanding Plato holdeth that In his Timeus man is pouruayed of store of repletion and cloying for the intestines to shewe that God hath created him a soule full of reason councell with out which as the plants are euermore fastened to their rootes for their feeding so would hee likewise alwaies haue meate in his mouth or else as the beasts his minde would be perpetually labouring in seeking after nothing but fresh pasture You may see the same thus while the meate dooth conuay it selfe by the passages of the belli● the spirit naturally sends his strength vegetatiue nutritiue thorow the bodie and by this commixture life the motion of the bodie is maintained and as this more sublime part of nature passeth on further still to shewe the effects of his force and vertue so after foode hath sustained the bodie the spirit is called too the desire of new viandes constrainde to yeeld it selfe subject to the bellies appetite Lib. 26. cap. 8. For there is nothing saith Plinie that is more painefull to a man then his bellie for the content whereof the most part of men imploy their whole life time This importuning vessell of the bodie euermore is at hand with vs like a greedie creditour summoning vs many times in the day but he is not to be listened to alwayes when he calls if hee haue had his dutie paide him No more then one vnder age who would not allow his tutour or guardian the expences for his nourishing as though he had liued with him onlie vppon winde and yet continually hath bin Tit. De alim pup praest C. by him and fed with his pursse but whosoeuer shall or doth deale so the Emperour hath iudged him not receiueable except he can proue he hath had his feeding elswhere The necessitie of the bellie is alwayes in such rigour with vs that the Stoicks themselues who were excluded in themselues from all sense of man constrainedly did yet listen to the bellies murmuring and did eate but how to the end they might shunne eating Quite contrarie to certaine gourmandes and gluttons who vsed then and yet doe to eate and drinke only to encrease their eating and drinking hauing no other God but their bellie wheron they bestowe whatsoeuer serues to excite luxurie for which the Seas are trauersed euen so farre as to the Riuer Phasis ransacking her entrailes for contentation agreeing with their insatiable appetites And this is that part wherein we come neerest vnto brute beastes who by their proper nature are led to desire whatsoeuer their bellie demaundes and with whom we make cōmon this necessitie of eating and drinking For nature hath giuen to all creatures one instrument of life which is naturall heate that euen as our wood in the fire hath his seate in the triple substaunce of our bodie to ●it the solide humorall and spirituous parts which without ceassing he ruinates and consumeth so that in very small while all would bee wasted if it were not maintained by a fresh supply of meates and drinkes neither more or lesse then as the flame of a Lampe which is extinct so soone as the Oyle is consumed if no more be put thereinto for longer lasting And heereupon Hippocrates Lib. 1. Aph. 14. the Prince of Phisitians sayd that the bodies of young men haue neede of more nourishment then others because they haue much more heate then they for otherwise saith hee their bodies would consume themselues Contrariwise the bodies of olde men because they haue but little store of heate they haue neede but of as little nourishing Aph. 13. Hence may we draw a confirmed atgument by this which Hippocrates himselfe hath said that old men easilie endure fasting but next thē such as are in the strength of theyr age yet lesse then young men infants least of all other but especially such as are liueliest and readiest in theyr bodily functions For the littlenes of heate the tenacitie of the primitiue humour and the densitie or thicknes of the body impeacheth old● men that this triple substance canno● wast it selfe at all whence proceedeth that they haue nothing at all such neede of meates and the desire or appetite after thē if so I may say which is hunger in them is much languishing As cōtrariwise in young men it is so much the more ardent as the heat naturall is aboundant the 〈◊〉 more fluxible and the composition of the body more thin and lesse heaped together VVhich three things as they cause the foode receiued to consume so by little and little they repaire any defect there arising For as it should be thus that the substance of euery creature dissolues it selfe by the pores of the skin into the ayre which enuirons it 1. De sym●om caus 7. saith Galen so followes it of necessitie that the very neerest parts of the skin should be first destitute of nouriture that by their propper strength vertue they might draw the nourishment from the other neighbouring parts onely to repaire that which through default of sustentation is become worst those there from the veines these heere from the liuer the liuer frō the intestines ventricle by the mesenterie veines calling what is most familiar and conuenable to his nature Then the ventricle seeing her selfe emptie by a naturall vnderstanding which she hath of that which is wanting to her shee is incited to desire meate wherwith she may be sustained But if some body be presented which hath but small store of heate and much more naturall moysture whereto the pores and respiracles of of the skin doe giue place there is no great euacuation made of this triple substance and so consequentlie there is no neede at all of much nourishment Neither is it altogether necessarie as Galen witnesseth

seruiceable for them These are the arguments wherwith the learned Ioubert hath fortified his opinion arguments which in my iudgement vntill this instant houre there could be no one found that did knowe deseruedly how to stand against them VVherto there are ioyned many examples both of plants and other creatures that not only preserue thēselues many dayes but also many yeares without any nourishment taken outwardly As in plants the Onyon and the Garlick c in graine VVheate Re Barley Oates Millet and others in and among beastes Serpents Lizardes Dormise Beares Crocodiles and Cameleons Of which examples Haruet striues to weaken the authoritie by opposition of the dissimulitude and great disproportion which is betweene the life of brute beastes yea much more of plants that of man because his principall is referred to the reasonable soule and theirs to the soule vnreasonable and beside that heate the instrument thereof is much more noble in man then in the vnreasonable soule and yet more in the vnreasonable soule then in the plant VVherto I answere that the similitude of these examples doo very well agree together in that kinde of life whereof we speake in this place which is the facultie of nourishing and feeding of the bodie which is equally distributed as well in beastes as in 2. Deg●● Cap. 5. plants saith Ari●●●tle And moreouer that they agree in the kinde of the cause to wit the rawe phlegmatique humour wherewith their bodies are as well filled as those of men But who can saith Har●et Page 78. support such a great aboundance of fleame in Diaphragma without a palpitation of the hart sicknesse of the stomacke paine of the collick the reines who can retaine them in the head without an apoplexie I answere that this humour abounding in cruditie seethes it selfe in the bodie there and yet hurtes it not at all for beeing according to nature it cannot create any accidents and diseases against nature He will obiect perhaps that the sole abounding of fleame causeth an apoplexie But I say that it is an excrement properly of the braine which hath not bin wunt to goe lodge it selfe at the ventricles therof nor doth except it be driuen by the spirit or the vapour He will say that in these natures the spirits are more feeble and haue not power sufficient to make so great a violence or impetuositie VVherto I reply albeit that otherwise the exercise of the bodie is healthfull saith Galen yet Com. 3. Aph. 20. neuerthelesse if you will exercise a man full of fleame or of one and the other choller or else full of bloode you shal forward him by such exercise either to an Epilepsie or Apoplexie Now where hee saith that our life is differing from that of Plants beasts and that her principle which is our soule is much more noble thē the others what is he that wil deny it whē Aristotle himselfe belieued that she onely was diuine and came from abroade or without to lodge within our bodie But because hee encloseth within his obiection the vegetatiue soule of Plants and the sensitiue of beasts it behooueth to let him know that our body hath a vegetatiue soule and nourisheth it selfe as a Plant senseth or senteth as a brute beast and hath the discourse of reason of which it makes vse as a man For marke but his beginning saith the same Aristotle he liueth as the plant and hath onely then the vegetatiue soule afterward in time he gaines the sensitiue at length comes the intellectuall and reasonable which bringeth with it all perfections For he is not all at one time both an animall and a man nor an animall and an horse though this reason be scant seemly in the mouth of a Christian Philosopher but he● is first of all an hearbe a Lettise afterward a dog a horsse or the like thing and at length he comes to be Casar or Cato De prisc● med But Haruet continues on yet and prooueth by Hippocrates that our elders would neuer haue sought out a proper manner of feeding for man if one selfe same drinking eating might haue suffised for the nourishment both of men and beasts Neuerthelesse he omitteth that which Hippocrates addeth that in the first age men vsed one selfe-same foode as the other creatures did when the inuention of sowing and planting was as yet vnknowne to them then they fedde on fruites which nature on her owne good will brought foorth without any tillage howbeit notwithstanding the omnipotent Creator of man had a wil from the beginning that he should not only feed on the fruites of the earth but also that he should vse the vnreasonable creatures for his nourishment VVhat would he haue Hippocrates to say more That which our auncients then did declared a will to prouide for the infirmitie of our naturall heat which beeing sometimes vnable to digest those meates that were too crude raw is now better supplied and maintained by such as are prepared and corrected by knowledge and experience in the dooing whereof the health of man is the lesse subiect to perrill Otherwise a man might take eate without danger if he had been thereto accustomed of Hemlocke with the Stare and of Helleborus with the Quaile or as Mithridates vse poysons not to be poysoned and he being inured to such a custome they were to him as naturall viands In like manner an old man of Athens recorded by Galen vsed familiarly 3. De fimpl fac Lib. 9. hist Plant. cap. 18. Arist de reg prin to eate Hemlock as Thrasiaes did the like of Helleborus by report of Theophrastus A mayden beeing sent by the King of the Indiaes to Alexander she did a long time feede before euery one of Napellus called VVoolfes-bane without any preiudice to herselfe But without all these the earth our good Mother hath not shee brought foorth from her bosome many other thinges necessary to maintaine life yes truly hath she in the estate as she receiues vs whē wee come to arriue in the Inne of this world she therafter entertaines and feedeth vs shewing herselfe alwaies benigne sweet indulgent ready to do whatsoeuer she can deuise to serue our vse VVhen shee is tilled and husbanded what diuersitie of foodes doth she produce proper and apt for our nourishing How plenteously is she furnished without tillage vvhat odours what fauours what iuyces what cullers And yet in this while we will needs exercise our crueltie vpon the brute beasts we will keepe those creatures imprisoned to whō Nature hath giuen the free wide palace of heauen VVhy are not vvee more carefull to make our bankets in simplicitie and without butcherie after the manner of Pythagoras rather then to war in the ayre aduēture life on the Seas and Riuers and make such spoile of the earth as wee Ouid. 1. Meta. doe Our elders doo report that the age which we call the golden age was happy in this that it fullied