Crosse and of all his benefites Because Christ hath commaunded me and all the faithfull to eate of this breade broken and to to drinke of the cup distributed in remembrance of him with this promise g Mat. 26.27.28 Mar. 14.22.23.24 Luc. 22.16.20 1. Cor. 10.16.17 11.23.24.25 12.13 adioined First that his bodie was as certainly broken and offred for me on the Crosse and his bloud shed for me as I behold with my eies the bread of the Lord broken vnto me and the cup communicated to me and further that my soul is no lesse assuredly fed to euerlasting life with his bodie which was crucified for vs and his bloud which was shedde for vs than I receiue and tast by the mouth of my bodie the bread and wine the signes of the bodie and bloud of our Lord receiued at the hand of the Minister 76 What is it to eate the bodie of Christ crucified and to drinke his bloud that was shed It is not onely to imbrace by an assured confidence of minde the whole passion and death of Christ and thereby to h Ioh. 6.35.40.47.48.50.51.53.54 obtain forgiuenes of sins and euerlasting life but also by the holy Ghost who dwelleth both in Christ and vs so more and more to bee a Ioh. 6.56 vnited to his sacred bodie that though he be in b Act. 3.21 Act. 1.9 c. 1. Cor. 11.26 heauen and we in earth yet neuerthelesse are wee flesh of his flesh and bone of his c Eph. 5.29.30.32 1. Cor. 6.15.17.19 1. Ioh. 3.24 4.13 Ioh. 14 23. bones and as all the members of the bodie are by one soule so are wee also quickened and d Io. 6.56.57.58 Io. 15.1.2.3.4.5.6 Eph. 4.15.16 guided by one and the same spirite 77 Where hath Christ promised that he will as certainely giue his bodie and bloude so to bee eaten and dronken as they eate this breade broken and drinke this cup In the institution of his supper the wordes whereof are these e 1. Cor. 11.23 c. Mat. 26.26 c. Mar. 14.22 c. Luc. 22.19 c. Our Lord Iesus Christ in the night that he was betraied tooke bread And when he had giuen thankes he brake it and said Take eate this is my bodie which is broken for you this doe you in remembrance of me Likewise also he tooke the cup when he had supped and saide f Exod. 24.8 Heb. 9.20 This cup is the Newe Testament in my bloud g Exod. 13.9 this doe as often as yee shall drinke it in remembrance of me For as often as ye shal eat this bread and drinke this cup ye shewe the Lordes death till he come This promise is repeated by Saint Paul when he saith The cup of thankesgiuing wherewith we giue thankes is it not the Communion of the bloud of Christ The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ h 1. Cor. 10.16.17 For wee that are manie are one bread and one bodie because wee all are partakers of one bread 78 Are then the bread and wine made the verie bodie and bloud of Christ No verily But as the water of baptisme is i Math. 26.29 Mar. 14.24 not turned into the bloud of Christ but is only a sign and pledge of those thinges that are sealed to vs in Baptisme So neither is the bread of the Lords Supper the verie bodie of k 1. Cor. 10.16 c. 11.26 c Christ Although according to the manner of Sacramentes and that i Gen. 17.10 c. Exod. 26.27.43.48 13 9. Act. 7.8 Exo. 24.8 Le. 16.10 17.11 Isa 6.6.7 Tit. 3.5 Act. 22.16 1. Pet. 3.21 1. Cor. 10.1 forme of speaking of them which is vsuall vnto the holy Ghost the bread is called the body of Christ 79 Why then doth Christ call breade his bodie and the cup his bloud or the new Testament in his bloud and Paul also calleth bread and wine the Communion of the bodie and bloude of Christ Christ not without great consideration speaketh so to wit not onely for to teach vs that as the bread and wine sustaine the life of the body so also his crucified body and bloudshed are indeed the meat drinke of our soul whereby it is a Iohn 6.51.55.56 nourished to eternall life but much more that by this visible signe and pledge he may assure vs that wee are as verily partakers of his bodie and bloud through the working of the holy ghost as wee doe b 1. Cor. 10.16.17 perceiue by the mouth of our bodie these holie signes in remembraunce of him and further also that his suffering and obedience is so certainely ours as though we our selues had suffered punishments for our sinnes and had satisfied God 80 What difference is there betweene the Supper of the Lord and the Popish Masse The Supper of the Lord testifieth to vs that we haue perfect forgiuenesse of all our sinnes for that only Sacrifice of Christ which himself once fully c Heb. 7.27 9 12.26.28 10.10.12.14 Iohn 19.30 Mat. 26.28 Luc. 22.19.20 wrought on the Crosse Then also that we by the holie Ghost are graffed into d 1. Cor. 6.17 10.16 12.13 Christ who now according to his humane nature is onely in heauen at the right hand of his e Heb. 1.3 8.1 c. Father and there will be f Ioan. 4.21.22.23 20.17 Luc. 24.52 Act. 7.55.56 Col. 3.1 Phil. 3.10 1. Thes 1.9.10 worshipped of vs. But in the Masse it is denied that the quicke and the dead haue remission of sins for the onely passion of Christ except also Christ bee daily offered for them by their Sacrificers Further also it is taught that Christ is bodilie vnder the formes of breade and wine and therefore is to bee a In canone Missae item de consecrat distin 2. worshipped in them And so the verie foundation of the Masse is nothing else than an vtter denyall of that onelie Sacrifice and passion of Christ Iesus and an accursed Idolatrie 81 Who are to come vnto the Table of the Lord They onely who are trulie sorrowfull that they haue offended GOD by their sinnes and yet trust that those sinnes are pardoned them for Christes sake and what other infirmities they haue that those are couered by his passion and death who also desire more and more to go forward in faith and integritie of life But hypocrites and they who doe not truely repent do eate and b 1. Cor. 10.21 11.28 c. drinke damnation to themselues 82 Are they also to be admitted to this supper who in confession and life declare them-selues to bee Infidels and vngodlie No. For by that meanes the couenaunt of GOD is profaned and the wrath of GOD is c 1. Cor. 11.20.34 Is 1.11 c. 66.3 Ier. 7.21 c. Ps 50.16 c. stirred vp against the whole assemblie Wherefore the Church by the
posteritie Vnto other Nations but not vnto the Iewes it was free to be circumcised or not to be circumcised Wee must here obserue that they of the olde testament were of three sorts 1. Jsraelites which were of Abrahams posteritie and were necessarily bound by the Lawe to obserue circumcision the ceremonies 2. Proselytes who of the Gentiles were conuerted vnto the Iewes did more more for cōfirming of their faith submit thē selues vnto circumcision and the whole ceremonial lawe 3. Those of the gentiles who were conuerted vnto the Iewes but did not obserue the ceremonies For vnto the gentiles and Prosylites it was free to keepe or not to keepe circumcision and the ceremonies These latter were called also Religious men who embraced onely the doctrine and promises of god Obiect The males onelie were circumcised therefore the women were shut out from the couenant of grace Aunswere The women were comprehended in the circumcision of the males And God spared the weaker sex And it sufficed for them to come of godly progenitors 2 What are the ends of circumcision CIrcumcision was instituted 1. That it might bee a signe of the grace of God towardes Abrahams posteritie and that doubly First that God woulde receiue the beleeuers by the Messias who was to come Secondly that he would giue them the land of Canaan and graunt his church a certaine place there vntill the comming of the Messias 2. That it might be a bond to bind Abraham and his seede vnto thankefulnes or to faith and repentance and so to keepe the whole law 3. That it might bee a marke to distinguish the Iewes from other Nations and Sects 4. That it might bee a sacrament of initiating and receiuing them into the church 5. That it might bee an accusation and a signification of vncleannes For that rite did shewe that all men were subiect to sinnes and vnclean 6. That it might bee a signe which shoulde shewe and signifie that the meanes of their deliuerance through Christ which was to come shoulde not come elsewhence than from the bloud of Abraham 3 Why circumcision is abolished CIrcumcision is abolished 1. Because the thing signified is exhibited For among other things it signified that the Messias promised vnto the Fathers should come at length in his appointed time and should in our behalfe take our nature 2. Because circumcision was instituted for the seuering of the Iewes from all other Nations but now the church that difference being abolished is collected and gathered out of al Nations And now the sacrament of baptisme performerth the same vnto vs which circumcision did vnto them Moreouer as circumcision was a signe vnto them of their receiuing into the people of God So is baptisme vnto vs the first mark which seuereth the church from the wicked 4 Why Christ was circumcised CHrist was circumcised 1. That hee might signifie that hee was also a member of that circumcised people 2. That hee might shew that he receiued and tooke our sinnes on himselfe that he might satisfie for them 3. That he might testifie that he did entirelie and fullie fulfill the law in our behalfe 4. The circumcision of Christ was a part also of his humiliation and Ransome OF THE LORDS SVPPER THE chiefe questions 1 What the Supper of the Lord is 2 What are the ends thereof or wherefore it was instituted 3 What is differeth from Baptisme 4 What is the sense and meaning of the words of the institution 5 What is the difference betweene the Lords Supper and the Papists Masse 6 What is the right vse of the Supper 7 What the wicked receiue in the Supper 8 Who are to come and to be admitted vnto the Supper 1 WHAT THE SVPPER OF THE LORD IS FIrst we wil see by what names the Supper of the Lorde is called then wee wil in few woordes define what it is This action or ceremony or rite instituted by a Christ a little before his death is called A supper Why it is called a Supper from the first institution of it that is in respect of the originall or first beginning of this rite or in respect of the time wherein this ceremony was instituted which circumstance of time the church hath chaunged Jt is likewise called Synaxis that is Why a conuent a conuent in respect of the assembly and conuent of the church because some either few or many assemble and meete together in celebrating of the supper For in the first celebration the Disciples were present Take this and diuide it among you Wherefore it must needs be that there was some number there which also appeareth by the Apostle repeating the first institution 1. Cor. 11. where in the end he addeth When ye come together to eat tarry one for another And further that moe ought to come together to celebrate the supper this end of the supper doth euidently enough shew in that it was instituted to be a token and euen a bond of loue For we that are many are one bread and one bodie It is called also the Eucharist Why the Eucharist Why a sacrifice Why Missa because it is a rite and ceremony of thankesgiuing Last of all it is called also a sacrifice because it is the commemoration of christs propitiatory benefit And at length it was also called Missa frō the offering or from the dimissing of the rest who might not communicate after the sermō which went before the celebration was finished Now let vs come to define the Lords Supper The definition of the Lordes Supper THE Lords supper is a ceremonie or sacrament instituted and appointed of christ vnto the faithfull for a memorial of him whereby christ dooth certainly promise and seale vnto mee and all the faithfull first that his body was offered and broken on the crosse for mee and his bloode shed for me as truely as I see with my eies the bread of the Lord to be broken vnto me and his cup distributed and moreouer that hee doth as certainlie with his body crucified and his blood shed feed and nourish my soul vnto euerlasting life as my body is fed with the bread the cup of the lord receiued from the hand of the minister which are offered to me as certaine seales of the body blood of Christ It may be also more briefly defined on this wise The lords supper is a distributing receiuing of bread and wine commaunded of Christ vnto the faithfull that by these signes he might testifie that hee hath deliuered and yeelded his body vnto death and hath shedde his bloode for them and dooth giue them those thinges to eate and drinke that they might be vnto them the meate and drink of eternall life and that thereby also he might testifie that he would dwel in them for euer And againe that of the otherside hee might by the same signe bind them to mutuall dilection and loue seeing Christ spareth not to giue his body and bloode for vs. This
vnto vs of christs body euen as also it is coÌ„manded in the words of the institution Shew the Lords death til he come 5 The Analogie proportion of the sign the thing doth manifestly enough refel transubstantiatioÌ„ For in euery sacrament ar these two the sign the thing signified but the sign should perish if the bread should be transubstantiated that is if there shold be a change of the bread into christs body for so should remaine the thing signified onlie and not the signe therefore no sacrament Oâ—iection But the Accidents of bread and wine doe still remaine as whitenesse softnesse and such like Aunswere But so wil there not bee a proportion betweene the signe and the thing signified because accidents doe not nourish You can not say as the accidents of bread and wine nourish the body so the body of Christ nourisheth my soule vnto euerlasting life And further also the promise of God would by this meanes be made voide and frustrate For God promised that hee would giue the Messias not of the substaunce of wheat and wine but of the seede of Dauid Reply But we saie not that the bread and wine are conuerted into the substaunce of Christs bodie but that the substaunce of the bread and wine vanisheth quite awaie in place thereof succeedeth the substance of the bodie and bloud of Christ Aunswere Of this bread christ speaketh That it is his body and the same bread both before and in and after the administration of it is called bread Christ saith not this which is vnder the forme of bread is my body but he saith this that is this bread is my bodie And Paul saith The bread whith we breake is the communion of the bodie of Christ And againe For we that are many are one breade and one body Againe As often as yee shall eate this bread c. And a little after Whosoeuer shal eate this bread vnworthilie c. Moreouer Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eate of this bread Wherefore it is plaine and euident that the substaunce of bread and wine neither is changed neither perisheth neither lieth hid vnder a forme but remaineth stil the same bread and the same wine Nowe that there is no transubstantiation or conuersion of the substaunce of the breade and wine into the bodie of Christ is thus prooued If there bee anie transubstantiation christes institution is peruerted for it abolisheth and bringeth to nothing the substaunce of the bread which is the verie thing that in this ceremony is the body of christ For seing the bread is the body of Christ then doubtlesse if the bread remaine not neither doth the bodie of christ remaine in the supper and so christs woordes are no longer true when hee saide that that bread is his bodie and that wine his â—loud The Transubstantiaries if they be demaunded what thing it iâ— that they call the bodie of christ in the supper certainely they will not aunswere it is bread for they haue no bread left in the supper because it is transubstantiated but they will send vs to the very substance of christs body absolutely coÌ„sidered couered on the altar with the accidentes of bread Wherefore all they er who obiect and present the bodie of christ beeing considered by it selfe in it own proper matter and subiect to the external actions of the supper These and the former reasons refell consubstantiation also wherefore neither wil we bring any moe reasons seuerally against it Onely some certaine obiections of the Consubstantiaries themselues we will refute A refutation of obiections framed to confirme consubstantiation 1 OBiection Christ said This is my bodie But Christ is true Therefore we must beleeue him setting apart all Philosophicall subtiltie and sharpenes and so by consequent bread is not a signe of his bodie Aunswere Wee graunt their argument if they prooue that Christ putteth this to bee his meaning namely that Jn Vnder and With the bread is his bodie Replie But it is said here This is my bodie Aunswere In other sacramentes also are the like speeches as The Paschal Lambe is called the Passâ—ouer Bapâ—isme the washing of the newe-birth Circumcision the couenant Replie But we say not that the bread is the bodie of Christ reallie as the Papists say but that the bodie is in the bread Aunswere But in this respect the Papists seeme more to keep the word whom yet the Apostle expressely refuteth calling it bread both before the eating and in the eating and after the eating 2. It is no where saide either by Christ or by Saint Paul That the bodie of Christ is in the bread vnder the bread with the bread neither any where in scripture is this expressed But the true sense and meaning of those wordes is expressed in the text it self namely that the bread is the bodie of Christ symbolically that is as a symbole or tokeÌ„ of it For in the text it is plainly said Do this in remembrance of me So Paul also calleth the bread the communion of the bodie of christ Wherefore the bread is the representing or symbolical signifieng body of christ The bread is a sign of christs bodie but not a couert wherein his bodie it self remaineth 2 Obiection Christ is omnipotent Therefore his bodie may be there and so because he said it it is there Answere The reason is of no force which will conclude a thing to bee done because it may bee done Replie Whatsoeuer is at the right hand of God is euerie where Aunswere It is false For the sitting at the right hand of God signifieth the vnion of both natures in Christ his power and rule and excellencie of gifts Now although he rule all thinges yet is it not necessarie that hee shoulde bee present in bodie It is sufficient that his person is euery where and is present in dignitie As also hee sustained all thinges euen then when hee hung on the Crosse neither yet was his bodie euery where Therefore to say that christ sitteth at the right hand of the Father signifieth that christ is the person by whom the Father mediately gouerneth ruleth al things especiallie the church But no part of this Sitting is the vbiquitie of christs bodie it sufficeth that christs person is euery where 3 Obiection That which quickeneth and nourisheth vs is receiued into vs the bodie and bloud of christ doe quicken vs therefore they are receiued into vs. Aunswere The Maior is but meere particular and therefore false in general for not whatsoeuer quickeneth and nourisheth vs must necessarily be receiued into vs. That only must be receiued into vs necessarily which quickneth nourisheth naturally that is by a ioint-touching of our bodie This meate which so nourisheth vs after a naturall manner dooth not nourishe vs except thereby the substaunce of our bodie bee increased But wee speake farre otherwise of the nourishing of the soule which is spirituall Christes bodie doth not at all nourish vs naturally
obserued that Paschal sacrameÌ„t being abolished 2. That the same thing might be signified difference only of time excepted For the Paschal Lamb signified Christ which should come and should be sacrificed The supper Christ already sacrificed Obiection But when the supper was instituted Christ was yet to be sacrificed Aunswere But then was at hand the offering vp and sacrificing of Christ For a few houres after he was sacrificed and the supper was from that time forward to signifie christ sacrificed 3. That he might stir vp in his Disciples and in vs greater attention and marking of the cause for which he did institute it and that we might vnderstand how earnestly Christ would haue this supper to bee recommended vnto vs seeing he did nothing before his death but that which was of most weight and moment Therefore did he in the very point or instaunt before his death institute it For it is as it were the testament and last wil of our testatour For which cause it is added In the same night that he was betraied Hee tooke bread That is vnleauened bread nor leauened which then they did eat of at the table The institution of the Supper and Vnleauened bread did concur then together and fall out by an accident and therefore he prescribed not any certaine manner of baking bread for the lords supper Yet notwithstanding the bread of the Lords supper differeth from common bread because this is taken for the nourishment of the bodie but that for the foode and nourishment of the soul that is for the confirmation of our faith And here wee are to note that he is saide to haue taken bread from the table Hee tooke not his bodie therefore neither tooke hee his bodie in the bread with the bread or vnder the bread When hee had giuen thankes He gaue thanks for his office now performed and finished on earth his last act yet remaining to bee done that thus it had pleased the Father to redeeme mankind or that the typicall passouer was abolished and the signified passouer was now exhibited or lastly hee gaue thankes for the admirable and wonderfull gathering and preseruing of the church Hee brake it That is he brake the bread which hee tooke from the table distributed the same being one amongst many not any other inuisible thing hidden in the bread He brake not his bodie but the bread as S. Paul saieth The bread which we breake c. Now he distributed the bread being one among many because wee that are many are one bodie But the cause for which hee brake this bread was to signifie his passion and the separation of his bodie from his soul Wherefore the breaking of bread is a necessarie ceremonie both in respect of the signification in respect of our confirmation and therefore is this ceremonie also to bee reteined 1. Because Christ hath commaunded it 2. For our owne comfort that we may knowe the bodie of Christ to haue beene as certainly crucified for vs as we see the bread to bee broken 3. That the opinion of transubstantiation and consubstantiation may be pulled out of mens mindes Take This commandement belongeth to the disciples and to the whole Church of the new Testament Whence it is cleare and manifest 1. That the masse is not the Supper of the Lord but a priuate supper of him that sacrificeth 2. That we must not be idle beholders of the supper but religious receiuers of it 3. That the lords supper is not to be celebrated but in an assembly or congregation 4. That the supper is a signe in respect of God This is my body This that is this bread Obiection Then should it haue been said * These Greeke pronouns caÌ„not bee expressed with the like English particleâ— Because the woordes BREAD and BODY being of diuerse genders in Greeke the Greek pronouns also are diuerâ—e when aâ— in English our particle THIS serueth for woordes of all genders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aunswere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as if he had said this thing which I haue in my hand And that it is so to bee vnderstoode is prooued by these reasons 1. Christ tooke nothing but bread hee brake bread and gaue bread to his disciples to eate 2. Saint Paul saith expresly The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the bodie of â—hrist 3. Of the Wine it is said This cup is the new testament Wherefore after the same manner is it saide This that is this bread is my bodie that is a signe of my bodie which is broken and deliuered vnto death Wherefore farre be it from vs that we should say that Christ took bread visiblie and his bodie inuisiblie It is to be obserued that hee saith not Jn this is my bodie or this bread is my bodie inuisible but This bread is my bodie Which for you My Disciples that is for your saluation Is broken Obiection But Christes bodie neither was nor is broken Aunswere Hee hath a respect to the signification which the breaking of the breade did import Nowe this breaking signifieth the paines and renting of Christes bodie and the violent sundering of his soule and bodie one from the other For as the bread is broken and parted into diuers partes so the soule and bodie of Christ were separated and parted from each other Do this That is Being gathered assembled together take bread giue thankes distribute it Hee vnderstandeth the whole action which hee commaundeth and that to vs which beleeue and not the Iewes who were ready to crucifie him In remembraunce of me That is Thinking and meditating of my benefites which I haue done for you and which are by these rites recalled into your memory and further verily feeling and finding in heart that I giue you these my benâ—fites and therefore celebrating them by publique confession before God and Angels yea before men also and so giuing me thankes for them This remembraunce is the whole whose partes are the memory of christes benefites faith whereby we apply christ his merit vnto vs thankfulnesse or publique confession of his benefits Wherefore it followeth not Christ did institute his supper for a remembraunce of him therefore he did not institute it for confirmation of our faith For this obiection is no lesse friuolous than if I should say The holy Ghost confirmeth our faith Therefore the supper doth not For as it hath beene said before the reason followeth not to the remoouing of the instrumentall cause by the putting of the principall cause as neither dooth it follow to the deniâ—l of a paâ—â— by the putting of the whole For Remembrance compriseth the remembring of christes benefites faith and thanksgiuing For by his sacramentes christ remembreth vs of himselfe and his benefites and by his sacraments he raiseth and establisheth in vs our trust and confidence in him And further of that remembraunce of christes benefites it must follow that wee also yeelde thankes vnto him therefore publiquely This
one sacrifice for sinnes sitteth for euer at the right hand of God Now the Papists contrarie to these manifest places of scripture will haue Christ to be often offered in the Masse 6 The Masse is repugnant to the doctrine of grace and iustification which teacheth that in this life onelie is the time of obteining fauour by faith alone for the onelie merite of christ The papists neglecting faith which they haue no knowledge of reiecting Christs merit substitute in place thereof this idolatrous inuention For through and for this sacrifice of the Masse and so for this worke as they speake wrought they maintaine that the dead also obtaine remission of sinnes 7 The Masse is repugnant vnto the articles of our faith concerning the true humanitie of christ concerning his true ascension into heauen and his returning from thence at the day of iudgement For they make a corporal presence of christ in the Masse saying that christ is inuisible present vnder the forme of breade and wine the substance of the bread and wine beeing abolished as often as the Masse is celebrated and this presence of Christ is corporal when the accidents onely of the signe remaine Jt is contrarie also to the nature of sacraments which permitteth not the substance of the signs to be abolished neither requireth any naturall connexion of the signes and things and therefore neither is it required in the Supper which leadeth vs to christ crucified and raigning in heauen and from thence communicating himselfe vnto vs. 8 The Masse is contrarie to the communion of Saintes with Christ. For it imagineth an execrable inuention which is that Christes bodie doth descend into our bodies and remaineth as long within our bodies as the formes remaine of bread and wine But the supper reacheth that wee are made members of Christ by the holy gh st and ingraffed into him 9 The Masse is repugnaunt to the true worship of God because it maketh Christ to be there corporally present so by consequent there to bee worshipped Euen as of ould before his ascension it was not onely lawful but in duty required that Christ should be worshipped in whatsoeuer place hee was and so also did his Disciples alwaies worship him when he was present as also when he ascended from them but after his ascension they did not from that time adore worship him turning vnto any one particular place more than other Wherfore seing the Papists in their Masse tie the worship and adoration of christ vnto a thing whereunto christ himselfe by expresse word hath not tied it they professe them selues to be idolaters and doe no lesse absurdly and impiously in this than if they should worship Christ at a wal or if they should worship a piller falling downe before it Which we prooue 1. Because no creature hath power to ty the woorshippe of God to anie thing or place wherein God hath not commaunded by expresse word himselfe to be worshipped and wherein God hath not promised to hear vs. And hereby is the cause of that difference plainly scene why the Iewes directing their praier to the propitiatorie or mercy seat did notwithstanding withall in spirite worship the true God and were by promise from him assured to bee head but worshipping in Dan and in Bethel and in the high places and in the temple of Samaria were idolaters not knowing what they worshipped Ioh. 4 22. Yee worship that which yee knowe not we worship that which we know for saluation is of the Iewes and the cause of this thing is more at large declared in the second of Kinges cap. 17. 2. Because in the newe testament all worshippe which is tied to anie certaine place on earth is vtterlie taken awaie and spiritual worship onlie required stirred and kindled by the holy ghost and doone with a true faith and knowledge of God Ioh. 4.21 The houre commeth when ye shal neither in this mountaine nor at Jerusalem worship the Father In these words Christ doth plainely take away worship tied and restrained to any certaine place on earth Wherefore wee must also take away and haue in detestation this impious inuention of christs corporal presence in the Masse or in the breade and wine For this being but that christ is in bodie present in the bread whether it be said to be done by transubstantiation or by consubstantiation the popish adoration standeth fast and of the contrarie side the presence of Christs body in the breade is taken away if wee take away this foule and shamefull Popish adoration of Christs bodie lying couertly by their iudgement vnder the formes of bread and wine Now withall wee are here to obserue What it is to worship christ in the bread namelie to direct our worshippe in soule minde cogitation and as much as may be in the motion of our bodies to the place in which the bread is and turning thereto to yeelde reuerence vnto christ as if hee were present there m re than else-where So of olde they worshipped God at the Arke turning thereto with their mindes and as much as might be with their external grace and inclination of bodie 1 OBiection The Masse is an application of Christes sacrifice Therefore it is not to be taken away Aunsw I denie the Antecedent because wee applie Christs merit by faith onely Obiect 2. There must bee a perpetuall sacrifice in the Church because Jsai foretoldâ— that it should bee from sabbath to sabbath Aunswere There must indeed be a perpetuall sacrifice in the church which is the sacrifice of thankes-giuing 1. Because it is a remembraunce of Christes sacrifice 2. Because almes were giuen in the primitiue church after the supper was ended which were a sacrifice 3. The supper also is an Eucharistical or thankesgiuing sacrifice For a propitiatory sacrifice the Fathers neuer dreamt of 6 What is the right and lawful vse of the supper THE right and lawfull vse of the supper consisteth in three thinges 1. When the rites and ceremonies instituted of CHRIST are reteined and obserued yet so that they bee not obserued of one or two priuatelie but that in a conuenient and lawfull assemblie of the church the breade be broken distributed and receiued and the wine giuen to all that communicate in remembrance of Christes death that is for confirmation of their faith and to shew their thankefulnesse 2. When the rites are obserued of those persons for whome Christ did institute them that is when the bread and wine is distributed and receiued of others of whom the Lorde woulde haue it receiued namely not of his enemies but of his Disciples which are the faithful For the obseruing of the rite without faith and repentance is not the vse but the abuse of it 3. When the supper is receiued for the right end which is in commemoration and remembraunce of the Lordes death 7 What the wicked receiue in the Lords supper THE wicked receiue 1. The bare signes onely namely bread and wine 2. They receiue those signes
is gratefull vnto him thou shalt reape thence no comfort 2. Because there is first of all true consolation where there is thankfulnes for except thou be thankful thou canst not applie vnto thy selfe the merit of the Sonne of God For it is offered and applied onely to vs being thankful now thou canst not shewe thankfulnesse except thou knowe after what maner the Lord bestoweth on vs his benefites 3. The knowlege of our thankfulnesse is required necessarily because it is the chiefe ende and scope of our deliuery 1 Iohn 3.8 for this purpose appeared the Sonne of God that he might destroie the workes of the diuel 4. That we may know that those thinges which we doe are no merit but onely a declaring of our thankfulnes And what thou giuest thankes for that thou knowest that thou hast not deserued 5. By this thankfulnes our faith comfort is confirmed in vs. Obiection That which of it selfe followeth is not necessarie to be taught But thankfulnes must needes follow of it selfe Therefore it is not necessarie to be taught Aunswere Thankfulnes followeth deliuerie But not the maner of thankfulnes likewise for of this we are to bee instructed out of the word of God Furthermore that proposition is not vniuersally true for a thing may be taught which of it selfe doth greatlie followe for greater and fuller knowledge and confirmation Now thankfulnes it selfe we know 1. Out of the Gospel because it promiseth deliuerie with a condition of repentance 2. Out of the Law because the Law in speciall doth declare and determine the kindes of obedience Seeing that then the true sure and onely comfort of the faithful is the scope of the whole doctrine of christianity seeing that to that comfort these three are necessarily required that is The consideration of mans miserie of his deliuerie and of his thankfulnes it appeareth that these three are the chiefe partes of Christian doctrin And therfore we wil intreat of thē hereafter in order THE FIRST PART OF THE MISERIE OF MAN Whence knowest thou thy miserie OVT of the law of God a Rom. 3.20 What doth the Law of God require of vs That doth Christ summarily teach vs Mat. 22. Thou shalt loue the Lord thy God with all thy hart with all thy soule with al thy minde with all thy strength b Luk. 10.27 This is the first and the great commaundement and the second is like to this Thou shalt loue thy neighbour as thy selfe On these two commaundements hangeth the whole Law and the Prophets Art thou able to keepe all these thinges perfectlie No truely c Rom. 3.10 23. 1 Iohn 1.8 For by nature I am prone to the hatred of God and of my neighbour d Rom 8.7 Ephes 2.3 Tit. 33. Did God then make man so wicked and peruerse Not so e Gen. 1.31 But rather hee made him good and to his owne image f Gen. 1.26 27. that is endewed with true righteousnes and holines that hee might rightly know God his creator and hartily loue him liue with him blessed for euer and that to lawde and magnify him g 2 Cor. 3.18 Col. 3.10 Eph. 4.24 Whence then ariseth this wickednes of mans nature From the fall and disobedience of our first parentes Adam and Eue h Gen. 5. Rom. 5.12.18.19 Hence is our nature so corrupt that wee are all conceaued and borne in sinne i Psal 51.5 Gen. 53. Are wee so corrupt that wee are not at all apt to doe well and are prone to all vice Indeede wee are except we be regenerated by the holie Ghost k Iohn 3.5 Gen. 6.5 Iob. 10.4 15 14.16 3◠Esaie 53 6. Doth not God then iniurie to man who in the Law requireth that of him which he is not able to perfourme Noe l Iohn 3.5 Eph. 4.24 For God had made man such a one as he might perfourme it But man by the impulsion of the diuel m Luk 10.30 and his owne stubburnesse bereaued himselfe and all his posteritie of those diuine graces Doth God leaue this stubburnesse and falling-away of man vnpunished Noe But is angrie in most dreadfull maner n Rom. 5 1◠Heb. 9.27 as well for the sinnes wherein we are borne as also for those which our selues commit and in most iust iudgement punisheth them with present and euerlasting punishmentes as himselfe pronounceth Cursed bee hee that confirmeth not all the words of this Law to doe them o Deut. 27.26 Gal. 3.10 Is not God therefore mercifull Yea verilie hee is mercifull p Exod. 34.6 but so that hee is also iust q Exod. 20.5 Psal 5.5 2 Cor. 6.14 Wherefore his iustice requireth that the same which is committed against the diuine Maiesty of God should also be recōpenced with extreme that is euerlasting punishmentes both of bodie and soule IN THIS first part concerning the Miserie of man there are three places handled 1 Of sinne 2 Of the creation of man which maketh to the vnderstanding of the former place concerning sin 3 Of free will How we come to the knowledge of our miserie and sinne By the Lawe We know our miserie and that we haue sinned out of the Lawe of God which exacteth and requireth of vs the contrarie to that which is in vs. For we are prone to hate God and our neighbour which is very sinne it selfe but the Lawe requireth of vs the loue of God Nowe the name of miserie stretcheth farther then the name of Sinne. By the name of miserie we vnderstād the euil of trespas or offence that is al sin and the euil of punishment which comprehendeth al the destructions of our reasonable nature as griefes torments calamities To be short the euil of punishment comprehendeth al miseries and sinnes that follow after wherewith sinnes that goe before are punished So the numbring of the people committed by Dauid is both a punishment and a sinne That our miserie is learned out of the Law it appeareth sufficiently by this syllogisme or reason whose * That is proued by a syllogisme Whose maior being set by the Law Deut. 27.16 Gal. 3.30 Mat. 22.38 Maior or first proposition the Law it selfe mentioneth Accursed be euerie one who abideth not in the perfect loue of God and his neighbour Now this loue of God Christ calleth the first greatest commandement Likewise our conscience addeth the * And Minor added by our conscience The conclusion must necessarily follow as an approbation of the sentence of the Law Mat. 22.37 The part of the maior explicated 1 Why In perfect loue and what that is Minor or second propositiō I haue not abiddē in al of these two propositiōs ariseth the conclusion which is the approbation or alowing of the sentence of the Lawe therefore I am accursed So then out of the Law commeth our knowledge of sinne Neuertheles the Maior or first proposition is to be declared more at large First it is said
as much as al mē haue sinned cap. 7. We know that the law is spiritual but I am carnal sold vnder sinne Eph. 2. We were by nature the children of wrath as wel as others Last of al seeing infantes also are subiect to sinne whereupon also they die and are to be baptised as before time they were circumcised and they cannot as yet sinne by imitation it must needs be that sinne is bred in them as it is said Genes 8. The cogitation of mans heart is euill euen from his youth And Isaie 48. I called thee transgressor euen from thy womb Against this doctrine it is obiected first Obiect Of the deriuation of the soule from the soul of the parents If sinne bee propagated from the Parents vnto their posterity either the soul stained with originall sinne is deriued by deduction out of the soule of the Parents or is created by God of nothing infected with sinne and is infused into the bodie or els being created pure by God it draweth corruption and naughtines of the body vnto which it is vnited But since that a spiritual substance may not be cut into parts soules are not propagated by deduction out of the soule of the Parentes neither are they created corrupt of God because God by this meanes should be made autor of sinne contrarie to that which hath beene said God saw al which he had made they were verie good neither are the soules depraued by the bodies partly for that it would be against both the end vnto which man was created euen to life euerlasting and also against the goodnes of god for a pure and innocent soul to be ioined with a bodie of which it should be depraued partlie for that sinne can not be propagated by the bodie which ◠senseles neither exerciseth any action on the soule but by the soul Wherefore the children are not borne corrupt of corrupt parentes 1 Answere The souls are corrupted by the bodies To this the answeare is double First they can not proue that which in the third place in their Minor they affirme That the soules can not draw naughtines corruptiō from the bodies For our first Parentes also were created to eternall life and yet were depraued falling from god Wherefore as the creation of our first parentes and their triall by temptation and in temptation their falling away which being put their corruption was certainly to followe so also the vniting of the soules with their bodies in which certainlie they shall be corrupted is not contrarie to the goodnes of God partly because God is so good as also he will shew foorth his anger against sinne and his iustice togither with his mercie in his woorkes partly because he hath appointed a remedie in his sonne vnto the which who flie are deliuered from this hereditarie and necessarie corruption and from the danger of damnation neither is it disagreeing from his goodnes rather to saue men freed from sinne and death by the death of his onele begotten Son then if they had neuer fallen into these miseries Neither is it absurd that the nature or temperature of the bodie though it bee senseles yet should be prone to euill and no fit instrument for the good actions of the soule and that the soule not being established in that puritie in which it was made should follow the inclinations and corrupt temperature of the bodie and should fal from that integritie in which it was as soone as it is vnited vnto the bodie and seeing that the bodie proceeding from sinful and guiltie parentes is one part of a man that God should be offended with the whole man for that part of his which is guiltie and should withdraw the grace of his spirite that the other part also that is the soule being depriued of spiritual giftes may fall into wickednes and malediction But be it that they were able to prooue that Minor proposition 2 Answere The souls are togither created and vnited to their bodies yet there is another sufficient answere to the Maior so that wee haue no neede to enter into any doubtfull dispute about the deducting of the soule from the soule of the parentes by generation neither of the maner how Originall sinne is propagated For although wee graunt that the soules of all men as soone as they begin to liue are created of god yet it is not to be imagined that the soules haue a beeing some time before they are vnited to the bodies For at one and the same time they are both created and vnited to their bodies as it is said The soule of man is at the same time both created and vnited to the bodie Hee breathed in his face breath of life But as the substance also of bodies though it be taken out of the substance of the parentes yet is rightly said to be created of God that is framed by him and the substances both of men and diuels who both are sinfull are preserued of God neither is yet God the autor or maintainer of their sinne or malice so also the substance of the soules and their naturall faculties God togither both createth and bereaueth of his giftes which giftes hee gaue of that condition to Adam that hee would also giue them to his posteritie if himselfe did keepe them but would not giue them if hee by his vnthankfulnes should cast them away Now the soule being destitute of the spirite and spirituall light although it bee inclined to desires and operations yet is it blinde not inclined to such desires and actions as the law of God requireth And by this meanes the inclinations being despoiled of their rightnes are become of their owne accord euill and are repugnant to the lawe of God And those defectes in the minde and will and heart of our first parentes are the iust punishmentes of sin committed by our first parentes and by their seed in them as they are inflicted by God but the inclinations corrupted by these defectes and the defectes themselues because they are a cause that man neither is nor can bee conformable to the law of God they are sinnes as they are drawen by men sinning vpon themselues and their seede and as they haue from them and their seede their being 2 Obiection That which the Parents themselues haue not they cannot deriue vnto their posteritie Original sin is taken awaie from the godly Therefore at the leastwise these doe not deriue it to their posteritie Aunswere Original sinne is taken away from the godlie and saints of god as concerning the guilt of it that is so as it is remitted them for Christs sake But as it is a sinne repugnant to the Lawe so it abideth in them For although they be withal regenerated by the holie ghost vnto whomsoeuer their sinne is forgiuen yet that renewing is not perfected in this life Wherefore the godlie also doe deriue such a nature to their posteritie as themselues haue that is a corrupt one
Li. 3. de libero arbitrio cap 4. And Augustine God is a iust reuenger of those thinges of which yet he is not an euill autor Wherefore those sinnes which ensue and followe are in respect of god considered as most iust punishments which as they are punishments haue their beeing from him as their author and causer but as they are sinnes in respect of men they come God neither willing nor causing them but permitting onely seeing he doth not cause men to do that which he would haue done for a punishment to this end as for to obay therein his will For one and the same work is good and holy in respect of God and sin in respect of men by reason of the diuersitie both of the efficiences of the ends For first man by reason of his great both ignorance and corruption will and worketh euill only But God because hee is exceeding good and the verie rule of goodnesse and righteousnesse doing in all things what he wil will and worketh alwaies only that which is good Secondly men haue such an end of their actions as is disagreeing frō the Law of God that is what they doe they do not to that end to obay God but to fulfill their bad and corrupt desires But God hath the end of all his woorkes agreeing with his nature and Law euen that he may declare and execute his iustice goodnesse and mercie By these two thinges it commeth to passe that the reasonable creature woorking together with God God woorking vprightly and holily doth neuerthelesse it selfe woorke vnholylie and corruptly 5 What are the effects of sinne NOw that it is defined what sinne is and from whence it came we are to consider also what be the euils which follow sinne For except this also be knowen we know not yet how great euil there is in sinne and with how great hatred God pursueth it It hath been said before that euil was of two sorts one of crime or offence which is sinne the other of paine or punishment The euil of punishment is the effect of the euil of offence That this maie be the better vnderstoode we must here againe remember that of punishments Some are onlie punishments as are the destruction of nature or tormentes others both punishments and sins as al sins which haue followed since the first fal 1 The sinnes which follow are effects of those which go before Sinnes ensuing effects of sinnes which go before So original sinne is the effect of the sinne or fal of our first parents By one mans disobedience manie were made sinners And secondly All actual sinnes are effects of original sinne Sinne took occasion by the commandement and deceiued me And thirdlie The effect of actual sins is the increase of them that is greater guiltines by reason of the most iust iudgement of God because God punisheth sins with sins Wherefore God also gaue them vp to their hearts lustes Rom. 1.24 2 Thes 2.11 Mat. 25.29 Other mens sins oftentimes effectes of actual sinne And therefore God shal send them strong delusiō that they should beleeue lies Frō him that hath not shal be takē away also that which he hath And fourthly The effects of actual sins are also oftentimes other mens sins by reason of scandale or example wherby some are made worse of others are entised or moued to sin So the persuasion of the diuel caused man to decline from God and now it worketh in stubburn-minded men The diuel put it into the heart of Iudas to betraie Christ Ioh. 13. Euil speeches corrupt good maners So euill teachers doe withdrawe men from god to errours idolatry and other sins So a vse of liberty out of season offendeth and draweth men to sinne An euil conscience an effect of sinne 2 There followeth sin in the immoueable and perpetual order of Gods iudgement an euil conscience which is the knowledge and dislike which we haue in our mind of our own sinne and the knowledge of the iudgement of God against sin and that proceeding out of the knowledge of Gods Law vpon which ensueth the fear of the wrath of God and punishment according to the order of gods iustice and a flieng and hatred of God who destroieth sinne which is the beginning of desperation and eternall torments except it bee cured by the comfort of the gospel Rom. 2. The gentiles shewe the effect of the Law written in their harts their conscience also bearing witnes and their thoughts accusing one another or excusing And Isaiah There is no peace to the wicked Temporall and spiritual euils effects of sin 3 Temporall and spirituall euils as temporall death and in a worde all the calamities of this life These euils are onely punishments that is torments and dissolution of nature If any man obiect that they also are subiect to temporall death and other calamities who haue all their sinnes remitted them and therefore al temporall euils are not the punishmentes or effects of sinne Temporal euils in the regenerate are effectes of sinne not as punishmentes but as chastisements but some haue other causes we answere that the consequence holdeth not from the denial of one particular to the denial of the general For albeit the calamities of the regenerate are not effectes of sin as a punishment which is inflicted on men sinning that so the iustice of God might be satisfied yet are they effects of sinne as chastisementes and exercises whereby sinne is repressed and more and more purged out vntill at length by corporall death the whole be abolished Now that of the blind man Ioh. 9. Neither this man hath sinned nor his parents Christ meaneth not simply that they had not sinned or that their sins were not a cause of this calamity but that their sinnes were not the principal cause why he was borne blind but that the woorkes of God should be shewed on him Christ by a miracle opening his eies 4 Eternall death which is the effect of al sinnes Eternall death the effect of sin as they are sinnes For al of what quality soeuer they bee are punished either with eternal paine as in the reprobate or with equiualent paine to eternal as in the sonne This death doth begin in the reprobate euen in this world that is anxiety and torment of conscience which we also should feele except we were deliuered by the grace of God Now by the name of eternal death is not vnderstoode the destruction of the soule or body or the separation of them but the abandoning and banishing of the soule and bodie liuing from the face of God a continuall horror and torment and a feeling and flying of Gods wrath and iudgement and a horrible murmuring against God taking vengeance of their sinnes If they obiect that the sinnes of those who beleeue in Christ The regenerate though they sin are not punished with this death because Christ hath suffered an equiualent punishment for them are not punished with eternall
out of what dignitie and felicitie man hath throwne himselfe by his owne vnthankefulnes Thirdly that we may know whence sin came and so not thinke God to be vniust Fourthly that we may know the greatnes of sinne in vs. Fiftly that there may be kindled and increased in vs an earnest desire of recouering our first felicitie yea and farre greater than that was Sixtly that we may be thankefull for the restoring of it But there occurre many thinges which proue God not to bee the author of sinne 1 The nature of God He is of his owne nature good God not the author of sinne which was also proued before pag. 101. and the chiefe good how then should anie euill thing come from him 2. It is written Gen. 1.31 All that God had made was verie good 3. It is proued by the lawe of God by which hee condemneth all euill thinges and sinnes and commandeth good thinges Wherefore he is not the author of sinnes For the lawe of God is as it were the glas of that puritie which is in God 4. It is proued by the punishmentes which God inflicteth vpon sinners but he were vniust if he shoulde punish that in man whereof himselfe were author 5. By the description of sinne which is a destruction of the image of God in man according to which man was made This image was righteousnes And therefore not sinne More vnto this purpose hath beene spoken in the former place of sinne To this place of the creation may be referred the place of the Image of God Likewise the place of the first sinne of Adam and Eue. Those two places we will handle next after this that so afterwardes wee may come to the place of freewill which is also ioined with this of mans creation THE QVESTIONS OF MANS CREATION ARE ESPECIALLIE TWO 1 What man was created of God 2 To what end or for what man was created 1 What man was created of God This question is proposed euen for the same causes for which the whole place it self is 1. That it may appeare that God is not the author of sinne 2. That wee may know the greatnes of the sinne of mans vnthankefulnes 3. That we may pray to God craue earnestlie for his grace our deliuerie from sinne 4. That wee may bee thankefull for our deliuerie from sinne MAn was created first consisting of bodie and soule His bodie was fashioned of a masse or lumpe of earth Man created perfect both in bodie and soule immortall if hee stoode still in righteousnesse mortall if hee fell for mortalitie ensued on sinne His soule is a substaunce incorporeall vnderstanding and immortall this was by god infused and vnited to an instrumentall body to informe or quicken it and together with it to make and constitute one person or Subsistent namely man to worke certaine motions and actions external and internal by the ministerie of the bodie and without the ministerie of the bodie iust and pleasing God all which the soule accomplisheth in the bodie and some also by the bodie as an instrument some by it selfe without the bodie that is not vsing the bodie or any part thereof as an instrument of his operations Secondly man was created perfectlie wise Thirdly Perfectlie holie and iust Fourthly Lord ouer other creatures Fiftly Truely and perfectlie blessed and happie And this is to be created to the image of God Obiect Perfect wisedome righteousnes blessednes are in god alone Man perfect but in a certaine degree and measure not infinitly as God Man is not God therefore these could not be perfect in man Aunswere This reason is a fallacie deceiuing by reason of the equiuocation or ambiguitie of the word Perfect For in the Maior proposition is vnderstoode The perfection of the Creator which is the very immensitie and vnmeasurablenes of his essence and properties by reason whereof nothing can be added more vnto God whereby he may be greater or better or happier of which perfection if the Conclusion also speake wee graunt the whole reason for this perfection is communicated reallie to no creature at all no not to the fleshe of Christ But it is an other perfection which is in creatures namelie a perfection in partes and degrees For all creatures euen the most excellent haue onely partes and degrees of good thinges distributed of the Creator vnto them euerie one such as are agreeable to their nature and place All things therefore are in their owne kind or sort most good and perfect when they are and remaine such as God woulde then haue euerie of them to bee when hee created them So in man at his creation was perfect wisedome or knowledge perfect Righteousnesse perfect Blessednesse not that nothing could bee added more vnto them or that they did match and equall the perfections of God but because they had that degree of perfection in which degree God woulde haue them to bee in man Wherefore for mans perfection it was sufficient if hee knewe all those thinges concerning God and his workes which God woulde haue him to knowe and further if hee did shewe and performe that conformitie which God exacted of him It was not required to mans happinesse that hee shoulde knowe all thinges or bee perfectlie iust holie blessed and happie for that had not perfected man but transformed him into God The same is to bee conceiued and thought concerning the perfect wisedome Righteousnesse and Blessednes of Angels 2 For what man was created THe last and principall end of mans creation is the glorie and praise of god The principal end of mans creation to praise worship God For therfore god created reasonable creatures that being known of them he might bee magnified It is an action proper vnto man to know magnifie god Therefore he was created to know and worship God that is to professe him to call vpon him to giue thankes vnto him to obey him Lastly to loue God his neighbour The worship of God comprehendeth Profession and Inuocation on the name of God Thankesgiuing Praiers Obedience Other ends of mans creation are The knowledge of God which consisteth in our loue and dueties towards God and men Many other endes are subordinated to this principall end For vnto the worship is substituted the true knowledge of God For God not being known can not be worshipped This is euerlasting life that they may know thee alone to bee the true God Further To the knowledge of God is subordinated or next in order the felicity blessednes of man which is the fruition and euerlasting participation of God Mans felicitie in which consisteth glorie and eternall life To this is subordinated the manifestation of God The manifestation of God or the declaration of Gods mercie in his chosen to euerlasting life and of his iustice and wrath against sinne to be punished in the reprobate For that thou maist know God and be happy it is needfull also that he make himselfe
manifest vnto thee Vnto the manifestation of God is subordinated the preseruation of societie in mankinde For except there were men God shoulde not haue whom to manifest himselfe vnto The preseruation of the society of men I will declare thy name vnto my brethren To this preseruatiō there folow next in order the duties of nature and the mutuall good turnes and benefites of one man towards an other For no societie or coniunction or conuersing of men together can be or consist without mutuall dueties passing enterchangeably betweene them Wherefore the societie of men and mutuall communicating and imparting of dueties betweene them are the subordinate endes of man created seruing for the obtaining of the principall end which is the manifestation participation or fruition knowledge praise and worshippe of God When therefore God is saide to be the ende of man it is meant of him manifested participated knowne and worshipped And in this end as being the chief and last the whole felicitie and blessednes and glorie of man consisteth 1. Obiect Heauen earth and other creatures which are void of reason Other creatures are said to praise God as being the matter of his praise which yet they shoulde not bee if man and Angels were not are said to worshippe and magnifie God Therefore the worship and praise of God is not the proper end why man was created Answere This reason hath a fallacie of equiuocation or ambiguitie Creatures voide of reason are saide to worship and praise God not that they vnderstand ought of god or know and worship him But because they bearing certain prints and steps of Diuinitie in them are the matter of gods praise and worship But the creatures endewed with reason are said to praise and magnifie god not onely because in them are extant most conspicuous and notable testimonies of god but chiefly because they beeing endewed with a power facultie of vnderstanding of conforming themselues to the will of god know by the beholding contemplation of gods works in thēselues other creatures the infinite goodnes wisedome power iustice bounty and maiestie of god and are raised and stirred vp to worship god aright both in minde and in worde and in the whole obedience according to his diuine law And if god had not created creatures of reason and vnderstanding who might beholde consider and with thankefull minde acknowledge his workes and the order and disposing of thinges in whole nature other thinges which are voide of reason might no more be saide to praise and worship god that is to be the matter and occasion of praising him than if they had neuer beene at all 2. Obiection The felicitie and blessednes of man is a qualitie or condition and estate in which or with which man was created that is it is a part of the image of God and a forme or propertie of man Therefore it belōgeth to the first question what man was created and not to this of the end of mans creation Answere This hath no contrarietie in it for the same may be in diuers the finall cause the formal For the soule and the properties or faculties thereof are both the formal and final cause of a liuing bodie the forme as they actuate and giue life vnto the bodie the ende as the bodie is framed of nature for this that the soule may informe it and exercise by it his operations actions In like sort the blessednes of man or participation or fruition of god as also the knowledge of god is a propertie and part of the image of god in man in respect of the beginning when man by his creation beganne both to bee and to bee iust and blessed it is the ende of man in respect of continuance perseuerance that is as god created man wise iust and blessed for this that hee shoulde continue so for euer that is man was created iust and happie he was created for this that he might be iust and happie Wherefore albeit the existence of blessednesse and the continuance abiding of the same are the same in the thing it selfe yet in consideration and respect they are diuers By reason of which diuers respects felicitie wisedome holines are both a qualitie and an end of man that is are referred to the questions WHAT and FOR WHAT man was created This first creation of man is diligently to be compared with the miserie of mankinde as also the end for which we were created with the aberration and swaruing from the end that so by this meanes also wee may know the greatnes of our miserie For howe much the greater wee see the good was which wee haue lost so much the greater wee know the euils to be into which we are fallen OF THE IMAGE OF GOD IN MAN The chiefe questions hereof are 1. What the image of God in man is 2. How farre forth it is lost and how farre it remaineth 3. How it is repaired in man 4. How it is in Christ and how in vs. 1 What the image of God in man is The image of god to be considered not in the body but in the soule SEing god is not corporeal neither hath a body we must consider this image not in the body but in the soule of man and because it is very much darckened and almost blotted out by sinne wee must iudge of it not by that state in which men began to be after sinne was committed but by the repairing which commeth by Christ that is by the nature of man regenerated And to conclude whereas there is but a small beginning of regeneration in this life we shall at length in the euerlasting life and glorie behold and vnderstand perfitely the image of God wholy restored shining in vs. It is not to be sought onely in the substaunce but chieflie in the qualities and giftes of the soule Further that wee are not to seeke the image of God in the substaunce alone of the soule but chieflie in the vertues and giftes with which it was adorned of God in the creation it is euen thereby manifest for that the nature and substaunce of the soule remaineth euen in the vnregenerate but the image of God for the most part is lost yet notwithstanding because the soule is an vnderstanding spirite the more excellent spirite the more excellent part of mans substance separable from the body immortal the beginning and cause of life and mouing in a liuing body wee must confesse that the nature thereof though vnregenerat is some shadow of that Diuinitie But the image of God seeing the substance as of spiritual natures in generall so of the minde of man is vnknowne to vs in the mist and darkenes of this life is to be considered in those faculties and operations in which wee see man to excell other creatures and know him by the word works of God to bee agreeable and conformed vnto God These faculties are especially two The vnderstanding and will The
be obiected that this honor is proper vnto Christ to be the image of god Coloss 1. and Hebr. 1. it is well knowen that Christ is after an other sort the image of god than other men For hee is in respect of his Diuinitie the image not of himselfe neither of the holy Ghost but of his eternall father coeternal and consubstantiall and coequall with his Father in essence essential properties and workes and is that person by which the Father doth immediatly reueal himselfe in creating and preseruing all thinges but chiefly in sauing the elect Secondly In respect of his humane nature he is the image of God that of the whole Trinitie because the three persons together bestowed on Christs humanity these giftes properties maiestie which are the image of God Now albeit this image of God is created finite not immense yet doth hee by many degrees and in number of gifts as in wisedome righteousnes power glorie far excell al Angels men after a peculiar maner resembleth the fathers nature and wil vnto vs in doctrine vertues actions because as the human nature which he took vnto him so all the properties actions thereof are proper vnto the Substantiall coeternall word of the eternall father Iohn 14. Philip hee that hath seene me hath seene my father Beleeuest thou not that I am in the father the father in mee The wordes that I speake vnto you I speake not of my selfe but the father that dwelleth in me he doth the workes Angels holy men are termed the image of god as wel in respect of the son the holy ghost as of the eternal father as it is said Let vs make man in our image according to our likenes that not for the likenes or identity of essence or some equality but for the agreeing of some properties not in degree or essence but in kind imitation which are essential infinit in god but in the creatures finite accidental that is qualities motions framed in thē by god to represent in some sort his nature They also who as in time past the Anthropomorphitae will haue the image of god to be the forme of mans body Adam not the image of God according to his bodie but according to his soule say that whole Adam was made to the image of God and therefore according to his body also But they perceiue not the vsual maner of speaking of a person composed of diuers natures which is called The communicating of properties when that is communicated to the whole person in the concrete which is onely proper to one of the natures as in the same place Adam was made a liuing soule Now as the scripture mentioneth the nature of the soule so also doth it mention such an Image of God as agreeth not vnto the bodie Again they obiect Christ is the image of god The faithfull not in al thinges like vnto the diuinitie in which they are like Christ because Christ himselfe in his body was not like vnto God but vnto man But the faithfull beare in their bodie the Image of Christ Heb. 2. 4. Philip. 4. Therefore the body also is the image of Christ There are 4. terms in this Syllogism because christ is not in his body but in his Diuinity the image of his father in soul or in the gifts or properties thereof actions he is the image of the whole Diuinity or godhead Wherefore the image of god is in the faithful the same which the image of god is in Christ neither are they in all thinges like vnto the godhead in which they are like Christ because there is somewhat in Christ besides his Diuinity the image of the Diuinity which is in the soul that is his body which hath an affinity not with the diuine nature but with the nature of our bodies Again they say The frame of mans body is made with admirable skil cunning wherefore there shineth in it is beheld as in an image the wisedom of the creator But it foloweth not hereof that the body is the image of god For so should al things be made to the image of god seing that in al gods works his power wisedome goodnes doe appeare which yet the scripture doth not permit which setteth out onely the reasonable creatures with this title commendation placeth the image of god in those things which belong not to the body but to the soul Here also question is made concerning the place of the Apostle 1. Cor. 11. Man is the image glory of god How man is said of S. Paul to be the image of god and not the woman but the woman is the glory of the man where Paul seemeth to attribute the image of god onely to man and to take it away from the woman But the Apostle meaneth that man only is the image of god not in respect of his nature being partaker of diuine wisedome righteousnes ioy neither in respect of his dominiō ouer other creatures for these are common to man woman but in respect of ciuil domestical ecclesiasticall order Gen. 3.1 Cor. 14. 1. Tim. 2. in which he wil haue the publick gouernmēt administratiō to belong vnto the man not to the womā Quest Seing that mā was made to the image of God it is demanded whence came this state in which now we see all things contrary Ans From the sinne of our first Parents OF THE FIRST SINNE Next vnto the place of the image of god is adioyned the place of the first sinne For seeing man was created to the imade of God that is perfectly wise perfectly righteous perfectly blessed the questiō hath been not without cause in all times whence this present estate of man commeth wherein he except he be born again by the holy ghost cannot do other than sin and be obnoxious to calamities of all sortes and at length to death it selfe To this question answere cannot be made but out of the doctrine of the Church onely which is that all this confusion and miserie floweth from the first sinne of our first Parents We must see therefore what that sinne is concerning which fower thinges especially come to bee considered 1 What it was 2 What the causes thereof 3 What the effectes 4 Why god permitted it 1 What that first sinne of Adam and Eue was The manifoldnes of the first sinne 1 In pride against God IT was diuers and manifolde and many and most grieuous sinnes are seene in that first sinne 1. Pride against god ambition and an admiration of himselfe For man not content with that state wherein god had placed him desired to bee eequal with God This doth God charge him with when he saith Behold the man is become as one of vs to know good and euill 2 In incredulitie contempt of Gods iustice 2. Incredulitie and vnbeliefe and contempt of Gods iustice and mercie because
magnifie the bountifulnes of God towards vs we must aske all thinges of him as beeing our creatour and soueraign Lord who hath the right and power of giuing al good things to whom and how far he will himselfe and vse those things which are granted to our vse with a good conscience to the glorie of god who gaue them And that this may be done we must not by our infidelity cast our selues out of that right which wee receiue in Christ if god of his own power autority either giueth vs lesse than wee would or take away from vs that which he hath giuen wee must submit our selues patiently to his iust purpose most profitable for our saluation And seeing the soule is the better part of man the happinesse of the bodie dependeth on the happinesse of the soul seing also we are created to immortall life we ought to haue greater care of those things which belong to the soule and eternal life than of those which belong vnto the bodie and this tēporall life And at length seeing the end and blessednes of man is the participation communicating of god his knowledge worship let vs euer tend vnto it referre thither al our life actions And seeing we see one part of mankinde to be vessels of wrath to shewe the iustice and seueritie of God against Sinne let vs bee thankefull to God for that of his meere and infinite goodnesse he would haue vs to bee vessels of mercie to declare through all eternitie the riches of his glorie Last of all that we maie learne consider and begin these thinges in this life let vs to our power tender and helpe forward the common society and saluation of others for which we are borne OF FREE-WILL WHEREAS God is a most free agent and man was created to the image of God The causes of diuers controuersies arisen about free-will yea and was furnished with libertie of will it seemeth to many not to agree that all the actions of mans will are gouerned by the vnchangeable prouidence of God that the nature of men is so corrupted by the fall of our first parents and Originall sinne that it is able to bring forth nothing but that which is euill and displeasing God without the renewing and especiall benefite of the holy Ghost For neither do they acknowledge that for liberty which is tied to any necessity neither seemeth it that wee shoulde graunt the whole libertie of the will to haue beene lost by sin because also after the fal there are left in men some prints and steps of Gods image and the blame and crime of sinne cannot be laid on men except the will be free To this is added the pride of mans wit which admitteth nothing more hardly than that the glorie and original of all good should be transferred from men to God alone Further also the notable vertues of men not regenerated and lastly the iudgement of our sense and reason which doth not marke without the light of Gods woorde the secret gouernement of Gods prouidence in humane actions Wherefore hereupon haue risen controuersies debates concerning free-wil while the olde diuines yeelding too much vnto the Philosophers swelling with a vain perswasion of wisedome and righteousnesse and the latter ascenting vnto the former haue either spoke more magnificently than they ought to haue done of the strength and power of mans will or haue endeuoured to arrogate that vnto men which is not found in them since the first fall But let vs remember that this doctrin of free wil is a view and contemplation not of mens ability and excellencie but of their weaknes and misery which is therefore to bee ioined with the doctrine of the creation and fall of man that wee knowing the more from what top of dignity and felicity into how deepe a gulfe of ignominie and misery we are cast by sinne may not more deepely plunge our selues by a vaine confidence of our owne strength vnto euils but may incline to a true humility and thankfulnesse towards God and bee of him reuiued quickned and healed For that the scope of this disputation may be knowen and the vse thereof perceiued The state of the maine question about free will we must vnderstand that the principal question in it is this Whether as man auerted himselfe from God and corrupted himself so of the other side he be able by his owne strength to returne to God and to receiue grace offered by God and to amend himselfe And further whether the will of man be the first and principal cause why others are conuerted others persist in their sins and as wel of the conuerted as not conuerted others are more others lesse good or euil and in a woord doe either good or euill some after one maner some after another To this question the aduersaries Pelagians and the like make answere That so much grace is both giuen of God and left by nature to al men that they are able to returne vnto God and obey him neither ought we to seeke any other cause before or aboue mans wil for which others receiue or retaine others refuse or cast awaie diuine succour and aide in auoiding sinne and do after this or that manner order and institute their counsailes aad actions Contrariwise we haue learned out of the sacred scripture That albeit by nature so much of God and his wil is knowen to all as maie suffice for taking away all excuse from them of sin and although it be manifest that many woorks morally good may be done euen of the vnregenerate and the wil doth in them freely make choise either of good or euil yet no work pleasing to God can be vndertaken or perfourmed by any man without regeneration and the especial grace of the holy spirit neither can more or lesse good be in any mans counsailes or actions than God of his free and purposed goodnes to euery one doth cause in them neither any other way can the wil of any creature be inclined than whither it shal seeme good to the eternall and good counsel of God And yet all the actions of the created wil both good and bad are wrought freelie The chiefe questions here to be obserued are fiue 1 Of the word liberty or freedome 2 What is the liberty of the wil. 3 What is common and what diuerse in the liberty of will which is in God in Angels and man 4 Whether there be any liberty in vs and what 5 The degrees of free wil. 1 Of the word Liberty Libertie from bond misery THere is one kind of liberty from bond and misery And this signifieth a relation or respect that is the power or right or ordering either of person or thing made either by ones wil or by nature to deale at his owne arbiterment or motion according to honest Lawes or order agreeable to his nature and to enioy commodities conuenient for him without inhibition or
his law therfore euen the least sin meriteth eternal abiection and casting away Most certainelie both in respect of his iustice which abhorreth and punisheth whatsoeuer is not agreeable vnto it and in respect of his truth because hee had denounced before that he woulde punish men if they obeied not his commaundement God therefore seeing he is true doth neuer change this his sentence 1 Obiection But the wicked florish here Aunswere The wicked florish but for a short time to bee cast at length into eternal tormentes except they repent Yea in this life also they are punished First they are miserablie vexed with the torments and terrors of conscience which in the reprobate are the beginning and sense of eternall paines 2. Euen those good things which they vse with greatest pleasure serue for their punishment and destruction and verilie so much the more how much the lesse they know and acknowledge them for a punishment For it is a most grieuous punishment not to receiue gods gifts in respect of gods promise nor to know the right vse of them neither with his giftes to receiue a will and abilitie also to vse them well For if these thinges concurre not in the fruition of good things mens sinnes and punishment must needs be the more encreased and exasperated and thereby except there come conuersion eternal destruction or death is certainely purchased 3. They are afflicted with other punishmentes also most grieuous oftentimes yet with more grieuous in the life to come where it shal bee a continuall death not to bee dead 2 Obiection But God made not euil and death Aunswere The euils of sin and punishment had not come if man would He made them not in the beginning and further also after the beginning neither euill nor death shoulde haue beene except our selues had woulde For they ensued on the voluntarie sinne of man God forcibly inflicting them as a most iust punishment 3 Obiection If God punish sinnes with present and euerlasting punishments he punisheth the same twise is vniust but God punisheth sinnes with present and euerlasting punishmentes therefore he punisheth the same sinne twise and is vniust Answ The Minor is to be distinguished for it is but one punishment but hath seueral parts For present punishments are the beginning of euerlasting because they are not sufficient to satisfie Gods iustice 4 Obiection If God punish sinnes with eternall punishments Then either all of vs perish or Gods iustice is not satisfied Aunswere If God should punish our sinnes in vs with eternal punishments we should all perish neither should we euer recouer vs thence but hee doth not so punish them in vs neither yet is Gods iustice impeached or violated because hee punisheth our sinnes in Christ with a punishment temporall but yet equiualent to euerlasting This equability doth the Gospel adde vnto the rigour and seueritie of the law 5 Obiection The iustice of God permitteth not that the same sinne be twise punished but our sinnes are most fullie punished in his sonne and this punishment is imputed vnto the godlie or beleeuers Therefore the same ought no more to bee punished in the godlie and so they are vniustlie afflicted Aunswere The afflictions of the godly are not punishments and satisfaction for their sinnes but onely fatherly chastisementes and the Crosse whereby they are brought to humility Which that it may bee better vnderstoode wee are necessarily here to speake of afflictions or calamities OF AFFLICTIONS The chiefe questions are 1 How manie kindes of afflictions there be 2 What be the causes of them 3 What comforts are to be opposed against them 1 How manie kindes there be of afflictions SOme afflictions are temporal and some eternall Eternal are the tormentes of the soule and bodie proper vnto the wicked into which all the Diuels are to bee throwen and all wicked men who are not conuerted in this life The qualitie of these tormentes is expressed when they are called in scripture a worme fire horror euerlasting torment likewise euerlasting death which is not a destruction of the bodie and soule or a perpetuall senselesnes but an infinite and endlesse continuaunce of those tormentes which the wicked in this life dispairing begin to feele or it is neuer to be dead yet to die continually that is to liue forsaken and abiected of God subiect to all tormentes both of bodie and soule But wee are here to collect testimonies of scripture against Epicures of which heard not a fewe are found euen in the Popes court thereby to demonstrate that the pains torments of the wicked both in bodie and soule Why the punishment of sinne ought to bee eternall shal be eternal 1. Isai 66.24 Their worme shal not die their feare shal not be put out Mar. 9.43 Into hell into the fire that neuer shal bee quenched where their worme dieth not the fire neuer goeth out Mat. 25.41 Go into euerlasting fire which is prepared for the Diuel his Angels 1. Pet. 4.18 If the righteous scarcelie be saued where shall the vngodlie sinner appear Mat. 10.28 Feare him who can cast both bodie soul into helfire The soul is the cause fountain of sins the body as a thing without reason and brutish doth execute that which the soul sheweth commandeth wherefore both the author instrument of sins shal be punished 2. The reason also why the paines and punishments of sins should be eternal infinit is euident because for sin committed against the infinit good an infinit punishment is iustlie exacted neither coulde there be made by anie temporall punishment of a meere creature sufficient satisfaction vnto gods infinit eternal iustice therefore the temporal punishment of Christ that it might be sufficient to deliuer the elect was to be equiualent to eternall pains Here the Epicures obiect He that is exceeding mercifull How Gods mercie and his iustice stand together in inflicting eternall punishment cannot behold the eternal torments of his creatures much lesse inflict such on them God is exceeding merciful because his mercie doth far exceed our sins Therefore he doth not suffer his creatures to remain in eternal torments Answ The Maior is true when exceeding most exact iustice such as is in god doth not exact require that exceeding sinne haue exceeding punishment Replie Exceeding strict iustice doth not stand with exceeding mercie because that admitteth no mitigating equabilitie In God is exceeding iustice therefore not exceeding mercie Answ Both the Maior and the proofe thereof is false Because God punishing of his exceeding iustice our sin with exceeding punishment doth notwithstanding shewe exceeding equability and fauorablenes whiles he translateth the punishment thereof from vs laieth it vpon his sonne They frame also the same reply on this wise With him that followeth extreme or strict iustice mercie and equabilitie hath no place But god in punishing sinnes foloweth strict iustice Therfore he is not merciful To which we answer 1.
that the Maior is false in respect of him who for his wisedome knoweth means to mitigate punishmēts or to exercise mercy as that notwithstanding his iustice may remaine inuiolated and himselfe bee satisfied So god doth execute extreame and exquisite iustice in punishing our sinnes shewing neuerthelesse exceeding and maruelous equabilitie and lenity while hee punisheth them in his Sonne and not in vs. And therefore one degree of mercie denied doth not straight enforce the deniall of others God punisheth sinne in the reprobate with eternal punishments yet is he merciful while he is not delighted with the death of him that dieth but doth by differring and mitigating the punishment and by bestowing benefites inuite all men to repentance When a Iudge putteth a robber to death he executeth extreame iustice yet may he be mercifull withall if hee reioice not at the destruction of the man but had rather hee were saued if so the lawe permitted Temporal afflictions belong both to the wicked and the godly Temporall afflictions belong to both both vnto the godly and to the reprobate These are either punishments or the Crosse The punishment is either destruction or torment inflicted by order of iustice on the person giltie of sinne And this is proper vnto the reprobate because it is inflicted on them to this ende that Gods iustice may bee satisfied For the law bindeth all men either to obedience or to punishment In the wicked they are punishmentes in the godly the crosse Obiection But the euils which the wicked suffer in this life are lighter than that they shoulde satisfie Gods iustice Answere They are a part of their punishment though not their whole punishment Nowe as euerie part of the Aire is called Aire so euerie part of punishment is punishment The degrees therefore of the punishment and paines which the wicked suffer are to bee obserued The first degree is in this life For when the conscience of their misdeedes and wickednesse doth gnawe vexe and terrifie them then beginneth their hellish and infernall worme The second degree is in temporall death When they departing out of this life without comfort come into the place of torment and vexations Luke 16. The third degree is at the day of iudgement when againe to euerie of their bodies raised from the dead their soules shal bee reunited For then at length shall the paines of hell bee consummated and shall fall in troupes together on both bodie and soule The Crosse is the affliction of the godly The Crosse of the godly is of foure sortes For this is not properly a punishment because it is not inflicted that thereby Gods iustice shoulde bee satisfied for their sinnes Nowe the Crosse is of foure sortes which are drawen from the endes for which it is laid on the godly First the Chastisementes 1. Chastisements which GOD layeth on the godly for the remnaunts of sinne in them and oftentimes also for some peculiar sinnes committed by them that they may bee admonished of their vncleannesse and stirred to repentaunce and the studie of godlinesse and good workes least persisting in their sinnes they bee condemned For they are not according to iustice inflicted to bee any satisfaction or recompence for their sinnes but according to mercie for their amendment and saluation For by these chastisementes they are admonished of the anger of GOD against sinnes and of eternall punishment which GOD will inflict on them if they repent not Secondly 2. Tryals The proofes and tryals of their faith hope inuocation feare of GOD and patience that the elect may goe forwarde in these vertues and the same also bee made knowen to others Such was the affliction of Iob. Thirdly Martyrdomes 3. Martyrdomes which are testifications concerning their doctrine For when the godly are for the confession of true doctrine pressed with calamities or slaine these afflictions are no punishmentes of certaine transgressions but martyrdomes whereby they testifie and witnesse the doctrine of the gospell which they professe to bee true and doubt not to seale this with their bloud and whereby also they witnesse that they in exceeding tormentes and death feele and haue experience of that comfort which they did promise out of that doctrine in their teaching vnto others They witnesse also and testifie that there remaineth another life and an other iudgement after this life Fourthly lastly the Crosse is their Raunsome euen the obedience of Christ alone 4. Raunsome which is a satisfaction for our sinnes consisting of his whole humiliation from the very first point of his Conception in the wombe to his last agonie on the Crosse A briefe type or table of mans afflictions Afflictions are some Temporal In the wicked as punishmentes properly in speciall so called In the godly as the Crosse and that is 1 Chastisements 2 Trials 3 Martyrdome 4 Raunsome Eternal as the hellish torments of the damned 2 What are the causes of afflictions The impellent cause sinne SInne is the impellent cause because it is an euill merite and deserueth euill of punishmentes in the wicked and also of the Crosse in the godlie yet after a diuers maner and in diuers respects It is a cause of punishment in the wicked that sinne may bee recompensed with iust punishment In the godly the cause of the Crosse is not to satisfie Gods iustice but that sinne may be knowen and so relinquished and put off The impellent cause then of punishmentes in the wicked is their sin to be punished or recompensed The chiefe efficient Gods iustice The principall efficient cause is the iustice of god inflicting punishmēt for sin Instrumentall causes thereof are diuers Instrumental causes all creatures Angels and men both good and bad and all other creatures which are all armed against sinners and fight vnder GODS banner The finall cause is that the iustice of GOD may bee satisfied The causes of the crosse of the godly The causes of the crosse of the godlie are 1 The acknowledgeing and purging out of sin God doth not giue the bridle vnto the godly but by fatherly chastisementes restraineth recalleth and amendeth them 1. The acknowledging and relinquishing of sinne 1. Corin. 11.32 When wee are iudged wee are iudged of the Lord. Psalm 119.71 It is good for mee O Lord that thou hast humbled mee But hee giueth the raines to the wicked that they may gallop to destruction he endoweth them with the commodities of this life and suffereth them to enioy a short ioy thereby to shewe his loue towardes his creatures and to conuince them of vnthankfulnes and to take away al excuse from them 2. The hatred of the Diuell and the wicked 2. The hatred of the Diuel and wicked men Iohn 15.19 If ye were of the world the world would loue you The Diuel especially lieth in wait ambush against the church and assaulteth it both by tyrants and by heretiques to pul many from God 1. Pet. 5 8.
doth not good fortune followe a good conscience And therefore hee murmureth against God and fretteth as did Cato and others 5. The finall causes in their chastisementes trials 5. The final causes of their afflictions and Martyrdomes Those causes are first Gods glorie The torment is lesse to the godly when they know that GOD is honoured by their sufferings and that thereby they shewe their thankefulnesse vnto him Psalm 119.75 Thou art iust O Lorde and thy iudgements are right Secondly Our saluation which is accomplished by afflictions Psalm 119.71 It is good for mee that I haue beene afflicted 1. Cor. 11.32 When wee are iudged we are chastened of the Lorde because wee shoulde not bee condemned with the woorlde Thirdly the saluation of others that is their conuersion and confirming For Actes 5. The Apostles reioyced euen because they sawe many by their ministerie to bee conuerted vnto GOD and faith to bee confirmed in others by the example of their afflictions and constancy in the truth and doctrine that they were counted woorthy to suffer rebuke for Christs name The Philosophers say It is a good end for which thou sufferest that thou maiest saue thy country and attaine vnto euerlasting renowme and glory But yet in the meane season wretched man hee thinketh what will these thinges profite me when my selfe perish But we are chastised that wee may not perish with the world 6. The comparing of ends euentes 6. The conference and comparing together of euentes It is better for a short time to be chastised of the Lord with certaine and assured hope of a glorious deliuery than to liue in plenty and aboundaunce of thinges and to be pulled from God and to run into euerlasting perdition The Philosophers conferring and comparing euils together finde but little good arising out of so manie euils 7. The hope of recompence Because the true good for the obtaining whereof they suffer euils they are wholy ignoraunt of 7. The hope of recompence Matth. 5.12 Your rewarde is great in heauen Wee knowe that there remaine other blessinges for vs after this life nothing to be compared with these momentary afflictions Euen in this life also the Godlie receiue grater blessinges than other man For they haue GOD pacified and pleased with them and other spirituall giftes and the beginning of eternall life Therefore also corporall blessinges are profitable for their saluation Marc. 10.29 There is no man that hath forsaken house or bretheren or children or landes for my sake and the Ghospels but hee shall receiue a hundred-fould nowe at this present and in the woorlde to come eternall life Psalm 37.16 A small thing to the iust man is better than great riches to the wicked Roman 5.3 Wee reioyce in tribulations A recompence in small euils doth in some sort comfort the Philosophers but in great euils not at all because they thinke that they hadde rather want that recompence than buie it so deare the reason whereof is because the recompence is but vncertaine small and transitorie 8. The example of the Sonne of GOD. For the seruaunt is not aboue his Maister Iohn 15.20 8. The Examples of Christ and his Saintes who haue suffered before vs. And God will haue vs to bee made like to the image of his Sonne Roman 8.29 And Philip. 2.5 Let the same minde bee in you that was euen in Christ Iesus 2. Cor. 8.9 IESVS CHRIST beeing rich for your sakes became poore Let vs accompany therefore Christ in ignominy and in glory For both the thankfulnesse which we owe requireth this and seeing Christ hath died not for his owne profite but for ours why shoulde wee refuse to suffer any thing for our owne profite and commodity Likewise the examples of other holy and godly men who haue suffered with the sauing both of themselues others haue not perished in afflictions but haue beene maruailouslie saued preserued Mat. 5. So did they persecute the Prophets which haue beene before you The examples therefore of holy Martyrs doe comfort and hearten vs while we thinke that we are not better than they but rather woorse And therefore ought wee much more patiently to beare our crosse Againe seeing they haue beene preserued by GOD amiddest their afflictions and haue escaped out of them wee haue confidence also that wee shall bee preserued and deliuered because the Loue of GOD towardes his is immutable and knoweth no chaunge 9. 9. The certaine presence and assistance of goâ—â— The presence and assistaunce of GOD in all cases and chances of our life Wee know that God hath a care of vs euen in our crosse that he will defend comfort strengthen and establish vs by his spirite that wee may not through griefe and paine forsake him 1. Cor. 10.13 God doth not suffer vs to be tempted aboue our power Psal 19.15 I am with him in his tribulation Iohn 14.16 I will send you another comforter Iohn 14.23 I my father will come vnto him Ioh. 14.18 I will not leaue you comfortles Esay 49.15 Can a woman forget her child and not haue compassion on the Son of her wombe Though shee should forget 10. The final and ful deliuerie yet will I not forget thee 10 The finall and full deliuerie For as of punishment so also of deliuerie there are three degrees The first is in this life where we haue the beginning of eternall life The second is in our bodily death when the soul is caried into Abrahams bosome The third is after the resurrection of our bodies when wee shall bee both in body and soule perfectly blessed that is fully deliuered from all both sinne and punishment Ioh. 10.28 No man shall plucke them out of mine hande Rom. 8.30 Whom he iustified them also he glorified Reu. 21.4 God shall wipe away all teares from their eies Wherefore as the first consolation is the foundation and beginning so this last is the finishing and accomplishment of all the rest THE SECOND PART OF MANS DELIVERIE 12 Seeing then by the iust iudgement of God we are subiect both to temporall and eternall punishments is there yet any meanes or way remaining whereby we may be deliuered from these punishments be reconciled to God GOD will haue his iustice a Exod. 20.5 23.7 satisfied wherefore it is necessary that b Rom. 8.3 wee satisfy either by our selues or by another 13 Are we able to satisfie by our selues Not a whit Naie rather we doe euerie day c Iob. 9.2.3 15.15 Mat. 6.12 increase our debt 14 Is there any creature able in heauen or in earth which is only a creature to satisfie for vs None For first God will not d Heb. 2.14 punish that sin in any other creature which man hath committed And further neither can that which is nothing but a creature sustaine the wrath of god against sinne and e Psal 130.3 Iob. 4.18 25.5 deliuer others from it 15 What manner of Mediatour
that is a Sauiour Because he saueth vs from al our Å¿ Mat. 1.21 Heb. 7.25 sinnes Neither ought any safety to bee sought for from any other nor t Act. 4.12 can elsewhere be found 30 Doe they then beleeue in the only Sauiour Iesus who seeke for happinesse and safety of the Saintes or of themselues or elsewhere No. For although in worde they boast themselues of him as their sauiour yet indeed they deny the onlie Sauiour a 1. Cor. 1.13 30. c. Ga. 5.4 Iesus For it must needes be that either Iesus is not a perfect Sauior or that they who embrace him as their Sauiour with a true faith possesse all thinges in him which b Heb. 12.2 Isa 9.6 Col. 1.19.20 2.10 Isa 43.11 25. Ioh. 1.16 are required vnto saluation 31 Why is he called Christ that is annointed Because hee was ordained of the Father and annointed of the holy Ghost the c Ps 45.8 Heb. 1.9 Deut. 18.15 Acts. 3.22 chiefe Prophet and d Ioh. 1.18 15 15. Mat. 11.27 Ps 110.4 Heb. 7.21 10.21 Doctour who hath e opened vnto vs the secret counsaill and all the will of his father concerning our Redemption And the high-Priest who with that one onely Sacrifice of his bodie hath f Rom 8.34 5.9.10 redeemed vs and doth continuallie g Ps 2.6 Luk. 1.33 make intercession to his father for vs. And a king who ruleth vs by his word and spirit and defendeth and h Mat. 28.18 Ioh. 10.28 maintaineth that saluation which hee hath purchased for vs. 32 But why art thou called a Christian Because through faith I am a member of Iesus i Acts. 11.26 1 Cor. 6.15 christ and k 1. Ioh. 2.27 Is 59.21 Ioe 2.28 partaker of his annointing that both I may l Mat. 10.33 confesse his name present my selfe vnto him a liuely m Rom. 12.1 Apo. 5.8.10.1 Pet. 2.9.2 Tim. 2.12 Rom. 6.12.13 Apo. 1.6 sacrifice of thankfulnes and also may in this life fight against sin and satan with a free good coÌ„science afterward n 1. Tim. 1.18.19 enioy an euerlasting kingdom with christ ouer al creatures 33 For what cause is Christ called the only begotten sonne of God when we also are the sonnes of God Because christ alone is the coeternal natural son of the eternall o Ioh. 1.14 Heb. 1.2 Ioh. 3.16 4.9 father we p Rom. 8.5 Eph. 1.6 Ioh. 1.12 1. Ioh. 1.3 are but sonnes adopted of the father by grace for his sake 34 Wherefore callest thou him our Lord Because he redeeming ransoming both our body and soul from sins not with gold nor siluer but with his precious blood deliuering vs froÌ„ al the power of the diuel hath set vs a 1. Pet. 1.18 10.1 Cor. 6.20 7.23 Ep. 1.7 1. Tim. 2.5.6 free to serue him 35 What beleeuest thou when thou saist He was conceiued by the holy ghost borne of the Virgine Mary That the sonne of God who b Ioh. 1.1 17.5 Rom. 1.4 Col. 1.15 c. Ps 2.7 Mat. 3.17 16.16 is and continueth true and euerlasting c Rom. 9.5 Is 7.14 9.6 1. Io. 5.20 Io. 20.28 God d Ioh. 1.14 Gal. 4.4 tooke the verie nature of man of the flesh and bloode of the Virgine Mary by the woorking of the holy Ghost f Ps 132.11 Act. 2.30 c. Rom. 1 3. that withal he might be the true seed of Dauid like vnto his brethren in al things sin excepted a Mat. 1.18.20 Luc. 1.35 36 What profit takest thou by Christs holy conception and natiuity That hee is our i Heb. 2.16.17 Mediatour and dooth couer with his innocency and perfect holines my sins g Phil 2 7. in which I was conceiued h Heb. 4.15 7.26 that they may not come in the sight of k Psal 32.1.1 Cor. 1.30 Ro. 8.3.4 Gal. 4.4.5 God 37 What beleeuest thou when thou saist He suffered That hee all the time of his life which hee lead in the earth but especially at the end therof l 1. Pet. 2.24 3.18 Is 53.12 susteined the wrath of God both in body and soule against the sin of al mankind that he might by his passion as the onely m 1. Ioh. 2.2 4.10 Rom. 3.25 propitiatory sacrifice deliuer our body and soule from euerlasting damnation and purchase vnto vs the fauour of God righteousnes and euerlasting life 38 For what cause should hee suffer vnder Pilate as being his iudge That he being innocent and n Luk. 23.14 Ioh. 19.4 condemned before a ciuil iudge might o Psal 69.4 Is 53.4.5 2. Cor. 5.21 Gal. 3.13 deliuer vs froÌ„ the seuere iudgement of God which remained for al men 39 But is there any thing more in it that hee was fastned to the crosse than if hee had suffered any other kind of death There is more For by this I am assured that he took vpoÌ„ himself the curse which did lie on me For the death of the crosse was p Deut. 21.23 Gal. 3.13 accursed of god 40 Why was it necessary for Christ to humble himselfe vnto death Because the iustice and truth of God could by no a Gen. 2.71 other meanes be satisfied for our sins but by the very death of the b Heb. 2.9.14.15 Phil. 2.8 Sonne of God 41 To what end was he buried also That thereby he might make manifest that he was c Acts. 13.29 Mat. 27.60 Luk 23.53 Io. 19.38 c. dead indeede 42 But since that Christ died for vs why must we also die Our death is not a satisfaction for our sinnes but the abolishing of sinne and our passage into d Ioh. 5.24 Phi. 1.23 Rom. 7.24 euerlasting life 43 What other commodity receiue wee by the sacrifice and death of Christ That by the vertu of his death our old man is crucified slaine and e Ro. 6.6.7 c. buried together with him that hencefoorth euill lustes and desires may not f Rom. 6.12 raigne in vs but wee may g Rom. 12.1 offer our selues vnto him a sacrifice of thankesgiuing 44 Why is there added He descended into hel That in my greatest paines and most grieuous tentations I may support my selfe with this comfort that my Lorde Iesus Christ hath h Isay 53.10 Matth. 27.46 deliuered me by the vnspeakable distresses torments and terrors of his soul into which he was pluÌ„ged both before and then especially when hee hanged on the crosse from the straits and tormentes of hel 45 What doth the resurrection of Christ profit vs First by his resurrection he vanquished death that hee might i 1. Cor. 15.16 54.55 Rom. â—4 25 1. Pe. 1.3 c. 21. make vs partakers of that righteousnes which hee had gotten vs by his death Again we are now also k Rom. 6.4 Col. â— 1. c. Ep. 2.5 stirred vp by his
power to a new life Lastly the resurrectiō of our head christ is a l 1. Cor. 15.12 c. Rom. 8.11 pledge vnto vs of our glorious resurrection 46 How vnderstād you that He ascended into heauē That Christ his Disciples looking on was a Act. 1.9 Ma◠16 19. Luc. 24.51 taken vp from the earth into heauen and yet still b Heb. 4.14 7.25 9.11 Rom. 8.34 Eph 4.10 Col. 3.1 is there for our sakes and wil be vntill he come againe to iudge the quick and c Act. 1.11 Mat. 24.30 dead 47 Is not Christ with vs then vntill the ende of the world as he hath d Mat. 28.20 Mat 26.11 Io◠16.18 17.11 Acts. 3.21 promised Christ is true God and true man and so according to his manhood he is not now on earth but according to his godhead his maiesty his grace and spirit he e Ioh. 14 17. c. 16.13 Ep. 4.8 August tract 50. in Ioh is at no time from vs. 48 Are not by this means the two natures in Christ pulled asunder if his humanity bee not wheresoeuer his diuinity is No for seeing his diuinity is incomprehēsible euery where f Act. 7.49 17.27 c. Ier. 23.24 present it followeth necessarily that the same is without the bounds of his human nature which he took vnto him and yet is neuertheles in it g Col. 2.9 Ioh. 3 13. 11.15 Mat. 28.6 abideth personally vnited to it 49 What fruite doth the ascension of Christ into heauen bring vs First that he h 1. Ioh. 2.1.2 Rom. 8.34 maketh intercession to his father in heauen for vs. Next that wee haue our flesh in heauen that wee may bee confirmed thereby as by a sure pleadge that it shal come to passe that he who is our head will i Ioh. 14.2 20.17 Eph. 2.6 lift vp vs his mēbers vnto him Thirdly that hee k Ioh. 14.16 16.7.2 Cor. 1.22 2. Cor. 5.5 sendeth vs his spirit insteed of a pledge between him and vs by whose forcible working we seeke after not earthly but heauenly things where he himselfe is l Col. 3.1 Phil. 3.20 c. sitting at the right hand of God 50 Why is it further saide Hee sitteth at the right hand of God Because Christ therefore is ascended into heauen to m Ep. 1.20 5.23 Col. 1.18 shewe there that hee is the head of his church by whō the father n Mat. 28.18 Ioh. 5.22 gouerneth al things 51 What profite is this glorie of our head christ vnto vs First that through his holy spirite he a Eph. 4.10 powreth vpon vs his members heauenly graces Then that hee shieldeth and b Ps 2.9 101. 2. Ioh. 10.28 Ephes 4.8 defendeth vs by his power against all our enimies c Lu. 21.28 Ro. 8.23.24 Phi. 3.20 Tit. 2.13 52 What comfort hast thou by the comming againe of Christ to iudge the quicke and dead That in all my miseries and persecutions I looke with my head lifted vp for the verie same who before yeelded himselfe vnto the iudgemēt of God for me and d 2. Thess 1.6.7 1. Thess 4.16 Mat. 25.41 tooke away all malediction from me to come iudge from heauen to throw al his my enimies into euerlasting paines but to e Mat. 25.34 translate me with all his chosen vnto himself into celestiall ioies and euerlasting glory OF THE HOLIE-GHOST 53 What beleeuest thou concerning the holy-ghost First that he is true and coeternall God with the eternal father the f Gen. 1.2 Is 48.16 1. Cor. 3.16 1. Cor. 6.19 Act. 5.3.4 Son Secondly that he is also g Mat. 28.19 2. Cor. 1.2 giuen vnto mee to h Gal. 3.14 1. Pe. 1.2 1. Cor. 6.17 make mee through a true faith partaker of Christ and all his benefits to i Act. 9.31 comfort me and to k Ioh. 14.16 1. Pet. 4.14 abide with mee for euer 54 What beleeuest thou concerning the holy Catholicke Church of Christ I beleeue that the Sonne of l Ioh. 10.11 God doth from the m Gen. 26.4 beginning of the worlde n Rom. 8.29.30 Ep. 1.10 1. Pet. 1.20 to the end gather defend and o Is 59.21 Ro. 1.16 10.14.17 Eph. 5.26 preserue vnto himselfe by his spirite and p Act. 2.46 Eph. 4.3.4.5 woorde out of whole q Mat. 16.18 Ioh. 10.28 mankinde a company r 1. Ioh. 3.21 2. Cor. 13.5 chosen to euerlasting life and agreeing in true faith and that I am a liuely ſ 1. Ioh. 2.19 member of that company and so shall t 1. Cor. 1.8.9 Rom. 8.35 c. Psal 71.18 remaine for euer 55 What meane these wordes The communion of Saints First that al and euerie one who beleeueth are in common a Ioh. 1.3 Rom. 8.32 1. Cor. 12.13 21. 1. Cor. 6.17 partakers of Christ all his graces as being his members And then that euerie one ought readily b 1. Cor. 13.5 Phil. 2.45.6 cherefully to bestow the giftes graces which they haue receiued to the common commodity and safety of all 56 What beleeuest thou concerning remissiō of sins That god for the satisfaction made by c 1. Ioh. 2.2 2. Cor. 5.19.21 Christ hath put out all the remembrance d Ier. 31.34 Ps 103.3.4.10.11 Rom. 7.24.25 Rom. 8.1.2.3 of my sinnes also of that corruption within me wherewith I must fight all my life time and doth freely endowe me with the righteousnesse of christ that I e Ioh. 3.18 come not at any time into iudgement 57 What comfort hast thou by the Resurrection of the flesh That not only my soule after it shal depart out of my body shal presently be f Luc. 23.43 Phil. 1.23 taken vp to christ but that this my flesh also being raised vp by the power of christ shal be again vnited to my soul shal be g 1. Cor. 15.53 Iob. 29.25.26 1. Ioh. 3.2 Phil. 3.21 made like to the glorious body of christ 58 What comfort takest thou of the article of euerlasting life That for asmuch as h 2. Cor. 5.2.3 I feel already in my hart the beginning of euerlasting life it i 1. Cor. 2.9 Iohn 17.3 shal at length come to passe that after this life I shal enioy ful perfect blisse wherein I may magnifie God for euer which blessednesse verily neither eie hath seene nor eare hath heard neither hath any man in thought conceiued it 59 But when thou beleeuest all these thinges what profit redoundeth thence vnto thee That I am righteous in Christ before God and an heir of k Heb. 2.4 Rom. 1.17 Ioh. 3.36 eternal life 60 How art thou righteous before God l Rom. 3.21.22.24.25.28 5.1 Gal. 2.16 Ep. 2.8.9 Phil. 3.9 Only by faith in Christ Iesus so that although my conscience accuse me that I haue grieuously trespassed against al the commandemēts
the holie ghost proceeding from the Father and the Sonne Euen as it hath bin manifested from aboue certain worde thereof beeing deliuered by the Prophets Christ and the Apostles and by diuine testimonies tâ—at the eternall Father together with the Sonne and the holy ghost hath created heauen and earth and all creatures and worketh all good things in all that in mankind he hath chosen vnto himselfe and gathered a Church by and for the Sonne that by his Church this one and true Deitie may be according to the word deliuered from aboue acknowledged celebrated and adored in this life and in the life to come lastly that he is the iudge of the iust and vniust The description of God according to philosophie Philosophically he is described on this wise God is an eternall minde or intelligence sufficient in himselfe to all felicitie most good and the cause of good in nature So is hee defined by Plato in his book of Definitions likewise in his Timaeus And by Aristotle Lib. 12. Metaph. Cap. 7. and Lib. de Mundo c. The Theological description of god In what the former descriptions differ which the church deliuereth differeth from this Philosophical description because that is pefecter than this 1 In the number of parts whereof it addeth manie by nature vnknown vnto men as of the Trinity of the RedeÌ„ption of man c. 2. In the vnderstanding declaration of those parts which are common to both for the Theological description declareth them more certainlie and fullie 3. In the effect or fruite By Philosophie or the light of nature men are not able to bee brought to the true knowledge of God both because it is maimed and false by mens corruption as also because it doth not stirre vp in vs Godlines that is the loue and feare of God seeing it teacheth not those things whereby this is effectuated and brought to passe An explication of the description of God deliuered by the Church GOD is an essence That is a thing which 1. hath his being from none but from himselfe 2. is preserued or sustained of none but subsisteth by himselfe 3. is necessarilie 4. is the only cause vnto all other things of their being Wherfore he is called Iehoua as if you would saie beeing by himselfe and causing other things to be to wit according to his nature and promises Spirituall 1. Because hee is incorporeal as being infinite and indiuisible most excellent 2. Insensible For first experience teacheth this Secondly God is without sensible qualities which are the obiects of the senses and Thirdly hee is immense The eies perceiue onely thinges finite and which are within a certain compasse 3. He is spirituall because both himselfe liueth and is the author of all life both corporall and spirituall Obiection Against this opinion manie places of scripture haue beene heretofore by some alleadged How God and Angels appeared vnto men in which it is written that God and Angels did appeare and were seen thereby to proue that their nature is corporeal and visible But we are to know that not the very substances of God and Angels but created shapes and bodies were beheld of men made carried and moued by the will and vertue of God or Angels that by them they might make knowen their presence and vse their ministerie and seruice in instructing men of those thinges which seemed good vnto them And these were sometimes by imagination represented to the interiour senses of men which also somewhere may somewhere cannot be gathered out of the circumstances of the histories As the Angels appearing to Abraham Lot were inuested with true bodies as which might bee toucht and handled Whether Micha before Achab saw with the eies of his bodie or of his mind the Lord and his Angels is a matter of doubt But that those visible shapes were not the very substaunce of God is hereby manifest for that the scripture with great consent teacheth that God is seene of no man neither can be seene and incomprehensible and vnchangeable But those visible shapes were not alwaies the same How God is saied to be seene face to face 2 Obiection To these they adde that which is saide that God was seene of Iacob face to face Gen. 32. And of Moses Exod. 33. and Deut 34. And of all the people Deut. 5. And that all of vs shall see God face to face in the life to come 1. Cor. 13. By which metaphor or borrowed speeche is signified a cleare and conspicuous manifestation and knowledge of God which is perceiued not with the eies of the bodie but of the minde either by meanes as by the word by his woorkes and outwarde tokens and such as runne into the the senses whence the minde may gather somewhat of God Or without meanes by inwarde reuelation And albeit in the life to come shall bee a farre more bright knowledge of god than nowe yet to knowe god most perfectly is proper to god onely as it is saide Iohn 6.46 Not that any man hath seene the father saue hee which is of God hee hath seene the father So farre is it that the inuisible infinite and euerlasting Deitie may euer be conceaued by bodilie eies whose nature is not to perceiue any obiectes but such as are finite and limited How the partes of mans bodie are attributed vnto God 3 Obiection They haue alleaged also those sayinges wherein the parts of mans bodie are attributed to God But these also are not properly but by a Metaphor spoken of god whereby is signified to vs a power in god working after an incomprehensible manner his workes a certaine shadowe whereof are those actions which men doe by the ministerie and helpe of their bodily partes as the eies and eares signifie the wisedome of god whereby hee vnderstandeth all thinges the mouth the publishing of his worde the face the declaration tokens and feeling of his diuine goodnesse grace or seueritie anger The hart his loue the hands and armes his power the feete his presence 4 Obiection They haue affirmed also The image of God in man doeth not argue a bodily shape in God because man was made according to the image of god that therefore god hath a humane shape not marking that the image of god consisteth not in the shape and figure of the bodie but in the mind integritie of nature in wisedome righteousnes and true holines Eph. 4. As for Tertullian whereas he reasoneth that god is a bodie that he speaketh vnproperly therein and abuseth the word bodie in steed of substance not only Austine witnesseth in his Epistle to Quoduultdeus but this is also an argumeÌ„t proofe thereof because he termeth also the soules and Angels oftentimes bodies Wherefore let vs know that therefore wee are taught the nature of god to bee spirituall Why wee must knowe God to bee spirituall that wee may not conceiue of god anie thing which is grosse terrene carnall
and vnworthie his diuine Maiestie neither shoulde deeme that hee can bee perceiued by our bodilie senses or in thought imagined but shoulde consider his nature by his worde and woorkes that wee shoulde not dare to represent him by any bodilie shape and in a worde that wee shoulde remember that hee is to bee worshipped not with the gestures or other thinges of the bodie but with the minde and spirituall motion of the heart Lastly Seeing hee alone inspireth into vs temporall and euerlasting life wee shoulde acknowledge the gift of both to come from him Out of this fountaine onely wee should seeke it and indeuour to referre it wholy to his glorie Intelligent 1. Why God is saied to bee intilligent and against whom wee are to holde it Because hee is the cause both of the minde of man and of the notions shining in it and also of that order which it in the nature of thinges and common weales 2. Because all intelligence or vnderstanding of the creature commeth from him both in respect of the facultie as also in respect of the operation For neither can the efficient and preseruing cause of intelligent natures and of the vnderstanding it selfe and order in nature bee but intelligent and vnderstanding And therefore the holy Scripture also reasoneth on this wise Psalme 94.9 He that planted the eare shall hee not heare or hee that made the eie shall he not see Nowe this wee are to holde first against those who setting nature in the place of God imagine the world and the varietie and order of thinges in it to arise from the matter and the inclination thereof to this forme when as notwithstanding these thinges coulde not haue their beeing from a cause not intelligent Wee are to holde it also thereby to acknowledge not onely true knowledge it selfe but also all abilitie of vnderstanding and the sagacitie and perceueraunce of the senses and minde to be the gift of God Eternall That such an eternitie which can haue neither beginning nor any end of beeing agreeth to God alone both nature sheweth The eternitie of god without beginning or end for so much as hee is the first cause of all things and of infinite perfection power and the scripture also recounteth as Psal 90.2 Before the mountains were brought forth or euer the earth and world were made thou art God from euerlasting and world without end But we are to obserue that not therefore onely the eternitie of God is so often inculcated in the scriptures that in regard hereof hee may bee discerned from thinges created but also because hee will impart eternitie vnto vs that is hee hath purposed and promised that he will giue vs of his eternall goodnes and prouidence eternal blessings and will haue continuall care of vs through al eternitie and wil haue a kingdome in Angels men whereof shal be no end Therefore are wee giuen to vnderstand that God is eternal to vs God eternal vnto vs. that we may oppose the certain hope of eternall blessednes grounded vpon his eternitie against the shortnes of mortall life and against the frailtie of mans condition For seeing hee is eternal he can and seeing hee promiseth he will for euer preserue vs with his protection Psal 48.13 For this God is our GOD for euer and euer And Psalm 111.9 Hee hath commaunded his Couenant for euer Wherefore being vphelde by this consolation let vs neither refuse to suffer the short miserie of this life neither preferre the short felicitie thereof before eternal blessings and seeing God wil be not only bountifull towards the godly but iudge also of the vngodlie eternally let the cogitation of the eternal wrath of god keep and hold vs in the feare of god that we may not desire to buie the fading shewe of whatsoeuer good with eternal miserie That god is other from all his creatures we must hold first against Philosophers God other and diuerse from all creatures who wil haue the world or nature it selfe to bee god that is either a generall matter or a power or a minde and intelligence or some forme to be infused mingled tied to the bodies of the world them to informe quicken sustein and moue as the soule susteineth and moueth mans bodie Which Virgil calleth the spirit of the world others the soule of the world Secondly against those who imagine the creatures either all as Seruetus or some according to the doctrine of the Manichees to spring from the verie essēce or nature of god deriuing it selfe as they speake into others by propagation Thirdly that al prophane vnworthie idolatrous cogitation of god whereby god may be made like to anie creature may be excluded For that the essence of god is far other than the essēce of al the creatures both nature the word of god sheweth whē as it teacheth that god is wise Creator of the world now the world hath manie parts vnreasonable and it self cannot be Creator to it selfe it sheweth also that things are not deriued out of the substance of god that beeing vnchangeable and indiuisible And lastly that the Deitie is most vnlike different from all things created because there can neither be nor be imagined anie similitude of a finite nature and an infinite First therefore whereas the scripture saith How all thinges are saide to bee of God that al things are of god Rom. 11.1 Cor. 8. it doth not mean that al things are god or the essence of god or propagated from it For al other things are of god not as begotten of him or proceeding from him as the word and eternal spirite of god but as created that is made of nothing Rom. 4.17 Who calleth those things that are not as if they were Secondly when as the soule of man is called celestiall and diuine Likewise when it is said we are the generation of god Act. 17.29 This is not meant of the cōmunicating of the diuine substance as if the soul were deriued from the essence of god but of the similitude of properties of the creation The soule therefore is said to bee celestiall and diuine that is adorned with celestiall diuine powers gifts which although they be a certain shadowe of the diuine nature yet are they created qualities Thirdly whereas the elect and saints are said to bee of god to bee borne of god and his spirite and the sonnes of god and spirituall Iohn 1.13 8.47 3.6 Neither is this vnderstood of the propagation of the essence but of the similitude of the properties or of the image of God to the which they are refashioned by Gods spirite And fourthly when Paul also saith 1. Cor. 6.17 That he which is ioined vnto the Lord is one spirit and Peter 2. Pet. 1.4 That we are made partakers of the diuine nature we are taught both that the spirite of God dwelleth in vs by grace and is ioined vnto vs as also that there is begun
mutatiō before that original beginning of the motions mutations of nature For god wil from euerlasting to euerlasting that al should then begin haue their moueing mutation beeing when this beginning was made There is therefore an ambiguity in the word quietnes For we grant the Maior as concerning that quietnesse which signifieth a priuation in the subiect that is taken away by motion But the maior is false if it meane such a quietnesse as is an absolute denial of the being of motion This is takē away not by motion but by the wil of god which alone without second causes any motion beginneth motion 4 Ob. If time be eternal then motion also is eternal for time is the measure of motion Time as it is taken for the measure of motion is not eternal wherby we iudge how long or short al motiō is But time is eternal because euery instant or point of time is the end of that time which went before the beginning of that which followeth Therefore also motion is from euerlasting Auns The appellation of time heere is ambiguous or doubtfull and therefore causeth a double aunswere For if time bee taken onelie for the measure of some motion the Maior is true but if it be takē for the during of any thing the Maior is false as it is manifest in the during of quietnesse which during also is time So also eternity is time without any mutation of the thing which is eternall So the Minor also is true as concerning duration but as concerning the measuring of motion it is false Neither is it furthered by the argument which is adioined concerning an instant For the first instant or moment wherein any motion beginneth may bee also without any precedent motion for otherwise wee shoulde bee faine to say that all euen the shortest motions of all thinges were from euerlasting And that instant is onely the beginning or first point or indiuisible moment wherein time by the will of God beganne to flowe or multiply but it is not the end of any time forepast So the first point in a line hath only line after it not also before it that is it is the beginning of the line not also the end Heauen is not corrupted naturally but by the power of God 5 Obiection Whatsoeuer hath a beginning hath also an ending The celestiall bodies haue no ending Therefore they had no beginning Aunswere The Maior is to bee distinguished Whatsoeuer hath a beginning naturally by motion or alteration of a preexistent subiect hath an ending also and is corrupted to witte naturally by motion The celestial bodies are not corrupted that is naturally for they haue not a matter which is capeable of another forme Therefore they had no beginning that is by naturall motion For by order of nature corruption followeth the generation of one thing out of another Nowe although heauen is not corrupted naturally yet is it corruptible by the absolute power of GOD woorking without anie motion For the omnipotencie of the Creatour is able most freely either to preserue in the same state or to chaunge or to bring to nothing as well those things which he formeth out of other things as which hee produceth out of nothing 6 Obiection God is eternal Heauen is the pallace and seat of god Therefore heauen is eternal Answere It doth not follow For first there are foure termes in this Syllogisme For God is one thing and the pallace and seat of god another thing which is not god In like maner the body is the seat of the soule But it followeth not hereof that the body is a spirituall intelligent immortall essence because the soule is Secondly heauen is the seat of God not properly nor necessarily because God as being an infinite essence is in al thinges and without althings Lib. 1. de Coelo cap. 9. And Aristotle himselfe witnesseth that hee is without heauen Therefore hee can bee though heauen bee not neither needeth he this Tabernacle But hee is saide to dwell in heauen though hee fill all thinges with his essence and power 1. Because hee is aboue all thinges and the Lorde and ruler of all 2. Because hee exhibiteth there his glorie maiestie and grace more clearly and fullie to be beheld and enioied of the blessed Angels and men than heere on earth Against the first aunswere the Vbiquetaries replie in Aristotles behalfe on this manner Heauē is the place of the blessednes of the elect but not god himself or blessednesse The blessednesse of GOD is not without GOD but is GOD himselfe Heauen is the blessednesse of GOD not anie place Therefore heauen is GOD himselfe Answere 1. Not onlie Aristotle but the sacred scripture also doth eueriewhere distinguish heauen from god as the thing made from the maker thereof and also opposeth heauen to earth so that it affirmeth earth to bee below and heauen aboue vs where GOD communicateth himselfe and his blessednesse vnto the elect more clearelie and fullie than on earth Heauen saith GOD himselfe is my seat and earth my footestoole Wherefore although heauen were somewhere taken for heauenly blessednesse yet might it not bee heereof inferred that heauen properlie is not a place wherein the elect enioie and shall for euer enioie that blessednesse For also hell sometimes signifieth hellish pains yet so that it excludeth not the place where the wicked beeing truely seuered from the Godlie shall suffer those paines and tormentes 2. The Minor is false if heauen bee taken for that blessednesse which is GOD himselfe beeing sufficient vnto himselfe in all thinges For heauen is a thing created and finite that blessednesse is increate and immense And if it bee vnderstoode of a created blessednesse which is in vs communicated from GOD there are foure termes in the Syllogisme For the Maior proposition speaketh of an increated blessednesse which is the verie essence of GOD neither is communicated at anie time to anie creature The external respects and relations of God are not the mutation or perfection of God but of the creature 7 Obiection Hee that is Lorde in possession is happier than hee which is Lord onlie in possibilitie But GOD before the creation was onelie in possibilitie Lorde Therefore hee is made happier by the creation But this is absurd Therefore the woorlde was from euerlasting Aunswere He is happier that is Lord in possession true if by the actual dominion and gouernement there arise anie more good vnto him than hee had before But vnto GOD by reason of his exceeding great perfection simplenesse and immutabilitie there coulde or can nothing at all come by his creation and dominion ouer his creatures For the respectes and appellations of Creatour Lorde Sauiour Redeemer Father of mankinde and the like which GOD in time assumeth vnto him doe not appertaine to Gods essence but signifie the beginninges and mutations of creatures that is GOD is termed creatour not of anie newe action or forme that is in
common to all three persons yet the order and manner of woorking is different and appropriate to eache But the Ransome the Sonne onely hath paied Secondly The Sonne is called the onelie Sauiour in respect of the creature to whom hee is opposed and from whom hee is discerned that is from the woorke of saluation not the Father and the holy Ghost but the creatures onely are excluded For no creature deliuereth from sinne and death So 1. Corinth 2.16 it is saide The thinges of god knoweth no man but the Spirite of god But it followeth not hereof that the Father and the Sonne knowe not themselues For the Spirite in that place is compared with the creature not with the Father and the Sonne Replie But there haue beene manie Sauiours of the people and some of them also called by the same name as Iosua Therefore not CHRIST onelie is Sauiour Aunswere Other were termed Sauiours but in a most diuers respect First Because they carried a type of this IESVS as our true onelie and designed Sauiour by GOD. Nowe albeit the Patents of Iosua when they gaue him this name coulde not so much as suspect that by him shoulde come the deliuerie of the people of Israell yet was it decreed with GOD from euerlasting that hee as also others shoulde bee a type of the onelie Mediatour and Sauiour Wherefore by his secrete and vnknowen prouidence hee so mooued and ruled his Parentes willes that they shoulde call him Iosua Secondlie GOD by them bestowed onelie corporall and temporall benefites vpon the Israelites But by this Iesus he saueth all the chosen dispersed through the whole world from all euils both of bodie and soule from sinne and death euerlasting Thirdly Christ is the author of all good things both temporal and eternall and these he by his owne efficacie bestoweth on whom he will They were onelie instruments and ministers by whom Christ gaue safety and benefites temporal to the people 2 Iesus is the perfect sauiour 2 Moreouer that this Iesus is the perfect Sauiour and doth most perfectlie deliuer vs from all euils these places testifie Col. 2.9 In him dwelleth all the fulnes of the godhead bodilie And verse 10. Yee are compleat in him that is Christ is that one and perfect God the fountaine of all knowledge and good therefore he is sufficient for your saluation he who hath Christ cannot bee ignoraunt or want any of those thinges which are necessarie to eternal blessednes neither hath any need to aske them elsewhere 1. Iohn 1.7 The bloud of Iesus Christ clenseth vs from all sin Hebr. 7.25 Christ is able perfectlie to saue them that come vnto God by him seeing he euer liueth to make intercession for them Against the Papists merits and intercessions of saintes Hereof in the 3â— question of the Catechisme is inferred a notable consequence against the Papists who couple their owne woorkes and the intercessions of Saintes with Christes merite and intercession namely that they indeede spoile and robbe Iesus of this glorie whereby hee is the perfect and onelie Sauiour Which is also true of them who seeke for but the least iot of saluation or felicitie in themselues or other thinges without Christ The collection is this He is the perfect and onelie Sauiour who bestoweth saluation neither iointlie with others nor in part onelie but full intire and whole But this Iesus the sonne of Marie is that Sauiour which is the onelie and perfect Sauiour whereof demonstration hath beene made a little before Wherefore hee bestoweth saluation neither iointlie with others neither part thereof onlie but he alone performes the whole and by a consequent they who ioine moe intercessours with Iesus or craue and expect anie part of saluation elsewhere doe indeede denie the onelie Sauiour Iesus Obiection To pray for others is to make intercession God will that one should pray for another as the Saintes for Saintes Therefore he will that one make intercession for another And by a consequent the glorie of Christ is not impeached if the intercessions of Saints be adioined vnto his intercession Answere There is an ambiguitie both in the woorde Praier and in the word Intercession God wil that one pray and make intercession for an other But this they must doe not standing on the worthines of their owne intercession and merites but on the worthines of the intercession and merites of the onely Mediatour Christ Christ maketh intercession for vs because he prayeth will and obtaineth and effectuateth it himselfe that for his owne sacrifice and prayers wee may bee receiued of God the father into fauour and bee reformed according to his image Christ therefore maketh intercession for vs by the vigour and vertue of his owne proper worthines and merite for his own worthines be is heard and obtaineth what be desireth After this sort doe not the Saints make intercession one for another Wherefore seeing the Papists faigne that the Saintes doe by their owne merites and praiers obtaine for others grace and certain good thinges at Gods handes they manifestly derogate from the glorie of Christ and denie him to bee the onelie Sauiour 2 From what euils he saueth vs. HE deliuereth vs from all euils of all both crime Christ saueth vs from all euils both of crime and paine and paine most fullie and perfectly Math 1.21 He shal saue his people from their sinnes 1. Iohn 1.7 The bloud of Iesus Christ clenseth vs from all sinne that is that it may not bee imputed vnto vs and that it may not raigne in vs but bee abolished and so wee at length leaue off to sinne Wherefore also hee deliuereth vs from all paine and punishment For the cause being taken away which is sinne the effect is taken away which is punishment Rom. 8.1 Now then there is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Iesus Iohn 10.28 I giue vnto them eternall life The saluation then which this our Sauiour Iesus Christ bringeth vs is righteousnes and life euerlasting Dan 9 24. Seuentie weeks are determined to finish the wickednes and to seale vp the sinnes and to reconcile the iniquitie and to bring in euerlasting righteousnes 1. Cor. 1.30 He is made vnto vs wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemption 3 How he saueth HE saueth vs after two sorts First by his merite that is yeelding a sufficient punishment or satisfaction for our sinnes Christ saueth vs â— By his merit whereby hee hath merited for vs remission of sinnes reconciliation with God the holy Ghost saluation and life euerlasting Vnto this beare many places of holy Scripture witnesse in plentifull sort 1. Iohn 2.2 If anie man sinne wee haue an Aduocate with the Father Iesus Christ the iust And hee is the reconciliation for our sinnes and not for ours onelie but also for the sinnes of the whole woorld Rom. 3.25 Whom God hath set forth to be a reconciliation through faith in his bloud to declare his righteousnesse by the forgiuenesse of sinnes Rom 5
might power and at length to thrust them downe beeing falselie ouercome and conquered into eternall torments We are in this place to obserue the difference of the Prophetical Priestlie and roiall office both of them who were in the olde Testament and of Christ and of our selues In the olde Testament they were types or typicall Prophetes Priestes and Kings Christ is indeede the true Prophet King and Priest which they prefigured we are Prophetes Kinges and Priestes by participation as hauing Christs dignities communicated with vs. Now then let vs see what is our propheticall Priestly and roial office OF THE COMMVNION OF THE FAITHFVL OR CHRISTIANS WITH CHRIST IN the 32. Question wee are instructed concerning the inunction or annointing of the faithfull namely when they are called Christians or annointed and what is the dutie of Christians and what their comfort whereof this name doth aduertise thē Heere then is discoursed the common place concerning the communion of Christ the head with the faithfull his members and of the functions of these his members Hereof fowre things come to be considered 1 What is the annointing of Christians or whence beleeuers haue the name of Christians or Annointed 2 What is the Propheticall function of Christians 3 What their Priesthood 4 What their kingdome 1 WHAT IS THE ANNOINTING OF CHRISTIANS LVKE Act. 11.26 testifieth that the name of Christians first began to bee vsed in Antioche in the Apostles time whenas before time they had bin termed by the names of breethren Disciples Who is called a christian The name Christian is deriued from Christ in general he is called a Christian who is a Disciple of Christ followeth his doctrine or life who being inserted into Christ hath communion and fellowshippe with him whether he be such indeed or onelie carrieth a face or shewe before him of beeing such For there are two sortes of Christians some seeming or counterfeit Seeming false harted christiās and outward but not true that is hypocrits others seeming and true For not euery seeming christian that is who is in outward conuersation a Christian is an hypocrit though euery hypocrit is a seeming Christian They are called seeming but not true Christians who beeing baptized professe in woord life or outward conuersation the Doctrin and faith of christ and are in the company of those which are called but are not partakers of Christes benefites beeing destitute of true faith and conuersion Therefore they are not the true liuely members of the Church Mat. 20.16 Many are called but few chosen Seeming true harted christiās They are both seeming and true christians who being receiued by baptisme into the Church acknoweledge and professe Christs doctrine and being engraffed into Christ by a true faith are made partakers of all his benefites and beeing regenerated by the holie ghost led a life woorthie of true Christians Furthermore of hypocrites we are not here to speake but of those who are both without and within that is are truelie Christians and annointed of Christ by the holie ghost The annointing of these therefore The anointing of christians 1 Is an ordaining of them to an office 2 A bestowing of giftes on them whereof they take the appellation of Christians and Annointed is that being through a true faith engraffed by Baptisme into christ as members into their head they are made true partakers of his annointing For first he communicateth with them his Prophetical Priestly roial function that is he ordaineth maketh them Prophetes Priestes and Kinges Secondly he annointeth them with the true oile that is hee powreth into them the giftes of the holie ghost wherewith they beeing furnished maie easilie and rightlie discharge that their function For the holie Ghost is not idle in vs but woorketh the same in vs which hee doth in Christ albeit those graces and giftes in Christ are farre more excellent both in number and degree These thinges are expresselie shewed by these places of Scripture 1. Corin. 6 15. Knowe yee not that your bodies are the members of christ 1. Iohn 2.20 Yee haue an ointment from him that is Holie and yee haue knowen all thinges Actes 2.33 This Iesus by the right hande of God hath beene exalted and hath receiued of his Father the promise of the holie ghost and hath shed foorth this which yee nowe see and heare 1 Pet 2.9 Ye are a chosen generation a roiall Priesthoode Reuel 1.6 and 5.9 Thou wast killed and hast redeemed vs to God by thy blood out of euerie kinred and tongue and people and nation And hast made vs vnto our God Kings and Priestes and we shal raign on the earth By these places are these two thinges manifest What is to bee Christs member one is that our annointing is bestowed of Christ the other that it is bestowed onlie vpon those who are the members of Christ And to be the member of Christ is nothing else than to bee conioyned and vnited to Christ by the same spirite dwelling both in him and vs and by this spirite to be enriched with such righteousnesse and life as is in CHRIST to bee conformed vnto CHRIST and seeing this righteousnesse so long as wee remaine in this mortall bodie is vnperfect to bee acceptable vnto GOD for the righteousnesse of Christ which is imputed vnto vs. Rom. 8 11. 1. Corinth 6.7 Eph. 4.15.16 1. Corint 12.13 Rom 8.1 c. The similitude of mans bodie to declare our vnion with Christ Now the similitude of the head and members of the same bodie is most fitte and appliable to declare that most streit and indissoluble coniunction of vs with Christ For first As all the members of the bodie are knit to one and the same head and consequentlie to one another by sinews and fleshlie ligamentes and drawe their life sense and all their motion by the ministerie of the spirites from that one heade so long as they remaine vnited to their head and among themselues so Christ is that one and quickening head to whome al the elect who are the liuing members the church beeing vnited by the holie Ghost receiued thorough faith are quickened and are knit also among themselues by the meanes of mutuall charitie Which charitie and dilection must needs be there if we be ioined vnto the head For the connexion of the members with the heade is the originall and cause of the coniunction of the members among themselues For the quickning spirit of christ doth not flowe out of one member into another but out of one Christ as the head into all the members of the Church Ioh. 15.26 J wil send vnto you from the father the comforter the spirit of truth Secondly As in mans bodie are diuerse giftes and functions of the members and yet but one life and soule quickening and mouing all the members So in the bodie of the church are diuerse giftes and functions and yet but one spirite by the benefit whereof each
manie waies men are called sonnes 2 How Christ is and is called the sonne of God 3 Why his onelie begotten and first begotten 4 Whether the sonne be coeternal with god the father 1 HOW MANIE WAIES MEN ARE CALLED SONNES EVery sonne is a sonne either by nature or by grace A natural sonne A son by nature or a naturall and proper son is hee who is partaker of his fathers nature and essence or who hath the essence or nature of him whose sonne he is communicated vnto him and that either wholie as Christ in respect of his Godhead for vnto him the father by begetting him communicated his essence whole and the same or in part as men vnto whom is communicated some little seuered portion of their fathers essence Wherfore a naturall sonne beginneth at one and the same time both to be and to be a sonne A son by grace is he who hath the right and name of a sonne A sonne by grace not by nature that is not that he was procreated out of his substance whose sonne he is called but onelie by a free gift of his and by fauour So is he said the son of God by grace who not by nature but by Gods gift is called his sonne Nowe the sonnes of god by grace are of three sorts some by grace of creation The sonnes of God by grace of creation some by grace of adoption some by grace of vnion The sonnes of God by grace of creation are Angels and our first Parents before their fall For that God shoulde create them and conforme them vnto himselfe that is make them righteous and blessed and that now also he maintaineth those blessinges in them it is his benefite and gift proceeding of his grace And therefore God created them that hee might account them for his sonnes and they againe acknowledge and magnifie him as their bountiful and benigne father And although they were not borne of the substance of God yet neither were these at any time not his sonnes but at one and the same time beganne both to bee and to bee the sonnes of GOD. A sonne by grace of adoption or an adopted sonne is he Sonnes by grace or adoption who not by birth but onelie by the law and will of the adopter receiueth the right and name of a sonne so that hee is in the same place with him as if he had been borne of him whereas before hee had beene no sonne Wherefore an adopted sonne beginneth not at the same time to be to be a son but he sometime was when yet he was not a sonne After this sort that is by adoption are our first Parents after their fall so also are all the regenerat the sonnes of god For these by nature are the childrē of wrath but are adopted to be the sonnes of god are made Christs brethren not by any merite of their owne Our fraternitie and brotherhood with Christ but freely by for Christ Eph. 2. Furdermore our fraternitie brotherhood with Christ consisteth in these fower thinges 1. In the likenes and similitude of our humane nature For hee is true man procreated of the bloude of Adam the common father of vs all 2. In the fatherlie loue and bountifulnes of god towards vs who for Christs sake embraceth vs as his sonnes heapeth vpon vs his benefites 3 In our conformitie correspondence with Christ which is wrought by the holy Ghost whom hee bestoweth on vs. 4. In the consummation and accomplishment of his benefites that is in perfect eternal righteousnes blessednes and glorie In respect of the three latter we are the sonnes of God by adoption The sonne of God by grace of conception or vnion is Christ alone The sonne of God by grace of vnion in respect of his humane nature which by the special working of the holy ghost being conceiued formed and sanctified in the Virgins wombe was personally vnited vnto the word A TYPE OR FIGVRE OF THE SONNES OF GOD. Euerie Sonne of God is ether By nature and proper as is the WOORD onelie who hath by birth his fathers nature and substance communicated vnto him whole and the same By Grace either of Creation as Angels and Adam before his fall Conception and vnion as Christ according to his humanitie Adoption as Adam after his fall and all the regenerate 2 HOW CHRIST IS THE SONNE OF GOD. CHrist is the sonne of God according to both natures Christ is the sonne of God by nature according to his Godhead but in diuers respects According to his Godhead hee is the sonne by nature and his natural or proper and onely begotten sonne because according to this nature he alone was from euerlasting begotten of the substance of his father after a manner altogether ineffable beeing of the same nature and essence with him Ioh. 5.26 As the father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he giuen to the sonne to haue life in himselfe The eternall father therefore hath communicated vnto his sonne the life whereby both himselfe by himselfe necessarily is and maketh all other things to be which life is that one eternal Deitie creatresse and defendresse of all thinges Christ is the sonne of God by grace of vnion according to his manhood According to his humanitie hee is not the naturall and proper sonne of god because his humanitie as touching it selfe is not the person and it issued from the substance of his mother not from the substaunce of GOD But he is the sonne of god by grace not of adoption because he was at no time not his sonne as that hee shoulde bee made of no sonne or of the sonne of wrath the sonne of God but by grace of conception by the holie ghost and of vnion with the word For his humanitie was from the very wombe sanctified and vnited to the Godhead of the Word which Godhead is the sonne by nature That Christ according to his flesh was a sonne by grace not by merit of his humane nature And that a masse of fleshe in so maruelous manner by the power of the holy Ghost shoulde bee seuered out of the fleshe of the Virgin and that thereof beeing sanctified shoulde bee formed a true humane bodie that is quickened with a humane soule the same to be vnited to the verie sonne of god into one person subsistence was not the merite of his humane nature as which had not as yet any being is in it selfe but a creature but the speciall free gift or benefite of God as Paul in plaine woordes declareth Colos 1.19 It pleased saith hee the Father that in him should all fulnesse dwell And Phil. 2.9 God hath giuen him a name aboue euerie name Christ therefore as touching his humane nature was as the Sonne of GOD by grace euen presently from that very moment when hee beganne to bee borne man and that therefore because by the vertue of the holy Ghost
Iehoua is one in number of essence not of persons 12 Where are three and one there are foure But in God are three one to wit three persons and one essence Therefore there are foure in God Answere The Maior is to be distinguished Where are three and one reallie distinct there are foure But these three in God are not another thing distinct in the thing it selfe from the essence but each is that one essence the same and whole and they differ from their essence onely in their manner of subsisting or being The manner of existing is not a diuers substance from the existence being or essence 13 Christ according to that nature according to which in scripture he is called Son is the Son of god But according to his humane nature onely hee is called Sonne Therefore according to that onely and not according to his diuine also hee is the sonne of god and so by a consequent the sonne is not verie god Aunswere The minor is false For Christ is called the onely begotten and proper sonne of the Father and equal with the Father Iohn 3.16 Iohn 5.18 Rom. 8.32 The father hath created all thinges by the sonne The sonne from the verie beginning worketh all things likewise which the Father doth Iohn 5.17.19 The sonne reueiled the Fathers wil of receiuing mankinde into fauour vnto the Church before his flesh was borne Iohn 1.18 The sonne was sent into the worlde descended from heauen and tooke flesh Heb. 2.16 Iohn 3.13.17 But the Word which is God is the onely begotten and proper sonne of God and tooke flesh Iohn 1.14 And not the humane but the diuine nature of Christ is creatres and worketh with equal autoritie and power with the Father and descended from heauen Therefore God or the Godhead or diuine nature of Christ is both called in the scripture and is the sonne and by a consequent the sonne is that one true and verie God I BELEEVE IN CHRIST OVR LORD THree diuerse speeches are heere to bee obserued 1. To beleeue that Christ is Lord. To beleeue this is not sufficient for we beleeue also that the diuel is Lord but not of al nor ours as wee doe beleeue Christ to bee Lorde of vs all 2. To beleeue that Christ is Lord and that of al and also ours Neither is it enough to beleeue this For the Diuels beleeue also that Christ is their Lord as he hath ful right and autority not only ouer all other thinges but ouer them also to determin of them whatsoeuer pleaseth him 3. To beleeue in Christ our Lorde that is so to beleeue Christ to bee our Lorde that in him wee place our trust and confidence and bee thoroughly perswaded that by him wee are wholy freed and deliuered from all euill and are defended and safegarded against all our enemies and this is it which we especiallie ought to beleeue Whenas therefore we saie that wee beleeue in our Lorde we beleeue 1. That the Sonne of GOD Christ is Lorde of all creatures 2. But especiallie of his Church which beeing purchased with his owne bloode hee guideth defendeth and preserueth by his spirit 3. And that I am also one of his subiectes whom beeing redeemed from the power of the Diuell he mightilie preserueth ruleth maketh obedient vnto him and at length enricheth with eternal glorie that is I beleeue that hitherto I haue bin by and for Christ preserued and shal hereafter be preserued of him thorough al eternitie lastly that he vseth wil vse his dominion power which hee hath as ouer all other creatures so ouer me vnto my saluation and his owne glory But for the better vnderstanding of this that hath bin spoken wee are to obserue these two things 1 In what sense Christ is called Lord. 2 For what causes he is our Lord. 1 IN WHAT SENSE HE IS CALLED LORD TO bee a Lord is to haue right and power granted by Lawe either diuine or humane ouer some thing or person as to vse and enioie it and to dispose thereof at thy owne will and pleasure Christ therefore is our Lord First because he hath care of vs that is ruleth preserueth and keepeth vs as his owne to eternall life and glorie as beeing bought with his precious bloode Iohn 17.12 None of them is lost whom thou gauest me Ioh. 10.28 None shal plucke them out of my hand Secondlie because wee are bound to serue him both in bodie and soule that hee maie bee glorified by vs. 1. Cor. 6 20. Yee are bought with a price therefore glorifie God in your bodie and in your spirite for they are Gods Hereof also wee maie vnderstande that the woorde Lorde in the Creede is not a name of the diuine essence but of his office and is referred to both natures of Christ like as the names of Priest King and Prophet Christ then is our Lorde not onely in respect of his Diuinitie which created vs but also in respect of his humanity which redeemed vs. For the humane nature of Christ is the price of our redemption his diuine nature dooth giue and offer that price vnto the Father and dooth by the vertue of his spirite effectuallie applie it vnto vs sanctifie rule saue and defend vs against our enemies and dooth al these thinges the humane nature beeing priuie thereunto and most earnestlie willing it Yea further as hee is man also hee hath power not only ouer men but also ouer all creatures and therfore ouer the Angels themselues For the names of the office benefits dignity of christ are affirmed of his whole person to speak simply properly by communicating but not by confounding the properties of both natures 2 For what causes he is our Lord. CHRIST is Lord. 1. By right of creation gouernment Christ our Lord 1 By right of creation Of this rule and dominion it is said Al things that the father hath are mine Ioh. 16.15 For by him in him are al things created and by his mighty word that is by his forcible pleasure and wil or prouidence they are susteined and gouerned and whatsoeuer good is in al the creatures that wholy proceedeth from him And this is a most generall dominiō which extendeth it self vnto al creatures euen vnto diuels wicked men albeit not altogether after the same maner to vs to al the wicked diuels For. 1. he created vs to eternal life but them to destruction 2. The dominiō which christ hath ouer the wicked diuels cōsisteth in the right of requiring cōmanding of exercising his power bridling his enimies that is hee hath right power ouer the diuels and the wicked to doe with them what him listeth so that without his wil and pleasure they cannot so much as moue themselues And he permitteth them by bereauing and destituting them of the grace of his spirit to run headlong into sin and eternal destruction Hee hath also ouer vs right and power to do with vs what him listeth
but hee furthermore keepeth and gardeth vs as his owne flocke and proper people whome hee hath purchased with his bloode hee gouerneth vs also and guideth vs by his spirite hee woorcketh in our heartes faith and obedience that wee maie doe things acceptable vnto him and so fenceth vs against all the temptations of the Diuel and the flesh that we may neuer fal from him Therefore he is our Lord after a farre other sort than the Diuels and the reprobates 2 By right of redemption 2 Hee is our Lorde by right of redemption For hee alone paying the raunsome for vs deliuereth vs from the power of the Diuel by his spirit regenerateth vs and causeth vs to beginne to serue him and in this liberty whereunto hee hath brought vs by his merite and power hee also preserueth vs against al both outward and inward enemies euen to the end and being raised from the dead he fully enfreeeth and deliuereth vs from all sin and miserie and endoweth vs with eternal blisse and glorie And seeing hee hath deliuered freed vs it is manifest that we were Seruants and truely so wee were and are by nature Seruantes and bound-slaues of the Diuell from whose tyrannie Christ hath deliuered vs and heereupon nowe are wee the Seruants of Christ because vs who were by nature his enimies and deserued to be destroied of him hee notwithstanding preserued and deliuered For * The reason of this deriuation of the name Seruant could not be expressed in English as it is in latine from whēce our English word commeth Serui which signifieth seruants commeth from Seruando that is saued or preserued serui or seruants were first so named by the Romans from seruando which is in signification preserued bicause whē in the wars they might haue bin slain of their enemies they were preserued But this dominion of Christ ouer vs is speciall that is extendeth it selfe onely to the Church Obiection Jf we bee redeemed from the power of the Diuel therefore a ransome hath bin paid him for our redemption For from whose power wee are redeemed vnto him is the price and ransome due But God gaue not him the raunsome Therefore wee are not redeemed from the power of the Diuel Answer From whose power we are redeemed as hauing bin supreme Lord ouer vs and holding rightly his dominion ouer vs vnto him the price ransome is due But the diuel is no supreme Lord but the executioner of the supreme lord Wee are saide to bee redeemed in respect of god wee are deliuered in respect of the Diuel which is God who alone hath and holdeth by right dominion ouer vs. Wherefore in respect of God Christ redeemed vs for vnto him he hath paid the price But he hath deliuered vs or set vs at liberty in respect of the Diuell For wee are giuen vnto Christ our redeemer to bee his owne neither hath the Diuell nowe anie more right or power ouer vs. And this christs dominion and power ouer vs cost him enough who therefore also hath care of it and preserueth it Of that Dominion we dispute especiallie in this place For the Diuell dooth not acknowledge Christ to bee such a Lorde vnto him as wee confesse him to bee vnto vs because hee hath redeemed vs and because hee guideth vs with his spirite 3 In respect of our preseruation Christ is our Lorde 3 By right of preseruation because he defendeth vs vnto the end keepeth safegardeth vs to eternall life not only by defending our bodies from enimies but our soules also from sins Of this Dominion himselfe speaketh None of them are lost which thou gauest mee No man shal pluck my sheepe out of my hands He keepeth the wicked to destruction and defendeth their bodies only 4 In respect of Gods ordinance 4 In respect of Gods ordinance because the Father ordeined the woord and this person Christ vnto this that by him hee might woorke all thinges in heauen and in earth The Father gaue vs vnto him manifested him vnto vs to bee our Prince King Head hath made him heire of al. Now whereas he is our Lorde after a farre more excellent manner than others we also are far more bound to his allegeance obedience For he is so our lord that he doth indeed with vs what he wil and hath full right and power ouer vs but yet he vseth that his power to our saluation only For wee receiue dailie of this Lord moe and by infinite partes more excellent benefites than doe any other thoroughout the whole world And therefore wee ought alwaies to acknowledge the dominion and power which Christ hath ouer vs. Which acknowledging of his dominiō is 1. A profession of so great a benefit of christ as that he hath vouchsafed to be our lord to set free vs his enimies into this so fruitfull glorious a liberty 2. A confession of our bond duty For christ being so merciful a Lord vnto vs we ought both in word and life to professe our selues as his seruantes to bee bound to faithfull subiection and obedience vnto him in all thinges that he may bee magnified of vs for euer WHICH WAS CONCEIVED BY THE HOLY GHOST BORNE OF THE virgin Mary In the conception three thinges to bee obserued 1 The forming of Christs flesh First christ is said here to haue bin conceiued by the holy ghost Whereby three thinges are signified 1. That the masse of his humane nature was created or formed in the wombe of the Virgin miraculouslie and beside the order of thinges disposed of God in nature by the immediate working operation of the holy Ghost without the seede and substance of man Obiection But we are also formed and made of God Answere We mediately Christ immediately 2 The sanctifieng of his flesh 2. That the Holy Ghost did in the same moment and by the same operation cleanse this masse and from the verie point of the conception sanctifie it that is he caused that originall sinne should not issue into it and that for these causes First that hee might bee a pure sacrifice and a sufficient ransome for our redemption 2. Cor. 5.12 He hath made him to be sinne for vs which knew no sinne that we should be made the righteousnes of god in him Secondly That he might also sanctify vs by his sanctitie and holynesse For if Christ had beene a sinner hee could not haue satisfied for vs but himselfe should haue remained in death Therefore could he not haue bin our sanctifier neither by merit nor by his power and efficacie Heb. 2.11 For he that sanstifieth and they that are sanctified are all of one Heb. 7.26 Such an high Priest it became vs to haue which is holy harmelesse vndefiled separate from sinners Thirdly Iohn was not agreeable vnto the Word the eternall sonne of god to vnite personallie vnto him humane nature being stained defiled where in hee dwelleth as in his owne temple For God
is a consuming fire Fourthly That wee might know that whatsoeuer this sonne speaketh it is the will of God and the truth For whatsouer is borne of flesh which is sinful and not sanctified is flesh falshood and vanitie Obiection But he was borne of a Mother which was a sinner Why then should not Christ haue sinne Aunswere The Holy Ghost doth best know how to seuer sinne from mans nature for sinne is not of the nature of man but came else-whence euen from the Diuel Mary therefore was a sinner but that masse of flesh which was taken out of her substaunce was by the operation of the Holy Ghost at the same instant sanctified when it was taken The third thing which is signified 3 The vniting of his flesh vnto his Godhead in that Christ is saide to bee conceiued by the holie Ghost is the vnion of the humane nature with the Woorde For the fleshe of Christ was together both created or formed and also sanctified and vnited to the Sonne of the holy Ghost immediatelie but of the Father and the Sonne by the spirite It is added furder in the Creede Born of the Virgin that he was borne of the Virgine Mary that is of the Virgins substance and that cheifely for these causes 1 That we might know 1 The seede of Dauid Christ our Mediatour to be the true seede of Dauid that is to be true man and our brother who hath humane flesh made not of nothing neither else-whence but issued from the seede of Dauid Isaack and Abraham of whome also the virgine Mary hir selfe came yea of the selfe same masse of Adam whereof both they and we are 2 That it may certainly appeare vnto vs 2 Messias That this Iesus borne of the Virgine is that Messias promised vnto the Fathers For it was foretolde by the Prophets that the Messias the redeemer of mankind should be born of the stocke of Dauid and that by a miraculous conception birth hauing a Virgin for his Mother Wherefore seeing both that is both the prophecies and the miracles are in this Iesus fulfilled there can bee no doubt but that this is the Messias true Man and true God the reconciler of GOD and man 3 That this Christes birth of a Virgin might be a testimonie that he is pure and without sinne 3 Without sinne sanctified in the wombe of the Virgin by the vertue of the holy Ghost 4 That it might bee a figure of our regeneration 4 A figure of our new birth which is not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the wil of man but of God Iohn 1.13 Wherefore to beleeue in Christ which was conceiued by the Holie Ghost â—â—d borne of the Virgin Mary is to beleeue That this naturaâ— Sonne of God conceiued and borne after this maner is made true man after a marueilous order and the same to bee one Christ hauing two natures vnited by personall vnion one to another which are his diuinity and his humanitie and to beleeue farther that he was holy from his mothers wombe to redeeme sanctifie me and that I for this Sonnes sake so conceiued and born haue the right of the adoption of the Sonnes of God For he cannot be Mediatour betweene God men who is not himselfe man who is not righteous who is not vnited with the Woorde that is true and by nature God man of sufficiencie and abilitie to bestowe his purchased saluation for vs on vs. Next after this article of the conception and Natiuitie of Christ for the better vnderstanding thereof followeth not vnfitly the common place Of the incarnation of the Sonne of God or Of the two natures in Christ THE COMMON PLACE OF THE TWO NATVRES IN CHRIST The Questions here to be obserued 1 Whether there be two natures in the Mediatour 2 Whether they be one or two persons 3 If they be one person what maner of vnion that is of them and how made 4 Why this personall vnion was necessarie to be made 1 WHETHER THERE BE TWO NATVRES IN CHRIST OVR MEDIATOVR Two natures in Christ WHAT there are two natures in Christ this one reason doth shewe by good demonstrance Essentiall properties which are opposite caÌ„not be in the same nor be affirmed of the same thing in respect of the same nature or cause Vigilius lib. 4. One nature dooth not receiue in it selfe a thing contrarie diuerse But in one and the same Christ are are affirmed of him properties diuerse contrarie diuine and humane finite infinite passible impassible and such like Therefore there must needes be diuerse natures in him humane and diuine And that the very diuine nature creatresse of all thinges is in Christ Christ true man and of our kinde and nature hath bin alreadie proued It remaineth that we shew a true humane nature to be in him that such as ours is and perfect consisting of a bodie and a reasonable soule of which as of essentiall parts is made a third substance to wit this particular humanitie which the Word hauing taken once into the vnity of person doth neuer laie awaie againe Which we are to holde against heretickes both oulde and newe whereof some deny Christes fleshe to haue bin formed of the Virgins substance but will haue it brought down from Heauen into the Virgin or begotten in her of the substance of the holy Ghost Others fancie Christ to haue in steede of true fleshe the likenesse semblance and appearancie of a mans bodie Others acknowledge indeede that hee hath a true bodie but not a humane soule the roome whereof is supplied by the Woord vnited vnto the body Against these the like errors the sentence doctrine of the church is confirmed First by plaine places of scripture which testify christ Maries son to haue bin made like vnto vs in al things that is in essence in properties in infirmities sin only excepted Lu. 1.31 Loe thou shalt coÌ„ceiue in thy womb bear a son Seeing then the Virgine conceiued this her sonne in her womb bare it vntil the vsual time of deliuery and was deliuered of it as other weomen vse to bee of their children it followeth that his flesh was not brought from heauen or elsewhere taken which should but passe only through the womb of the Virgin but was formed in the Virgins womb of her seed substance Heb. 2.11 He that sanctifieth and they which are sanctified are al of one wherfore he is not ashamed to cal theÌ„ Bretheren And a litle after For asmuch as the children were partakers of the flesh and blood he also himselfe likewise took part with them Again In al things it became him to be like to his brethren Therfore he hath a humane nature of the same kind wholy with ours Heereof hee is called the fruite of Maries womb Luk. 1.42 the first begotten son of Mary Luk. 2.7 made of a woman Gal. 4.4 The seed of Abraham Gal. 3.16
Heb. 2.16 made of the seede of Dauid Rom. 1.3 Borne of the Iewes concerning the flesh Rom. 9.5 euery where the son of Abraham of Dauid and the son of man And also Luk. 3. his petigree stock concerning the fleshe is deduced vnto Adam Therefore hee was begotten of the substance of his mother Mary and issued from the same seede of Adam from which we did Luk. 24.39 Christ prooueth himselfe to be a true man and not a spirite by this that a spirite hath not fleshe and bones as hee hath and reteineth euen after his resurrection Apollinaris the hereticke saide that Christes bodie indeede was a true bodie but insteede of a soule he had the Woorde onlie But this man is easilie refuted because Christ should not then haue bin like vnto his brethren in al thinges except sinne And Christ himselfe doth plainly confesse My soule is verie heauy euen vnto the death Mat. 26.38 And Luk 2.52 he is said to haue encreased in wisedome and stature and in fauour with God and men And Iohn 10.18 To laie downe his soule and to take it againe But to encrease in wisedome and to bee heauy and sad doe neither agree vnto a bodie which is reasonlesse neither vnto the god-head which is not obnoxious to changes and passions Hither belongeth also that Luk. 23.46 Father into thine handes I commend my spirit And when hee thus had said He gaue vp the Ghost This cannot bee saide of christs godhead For that being immense infinit is euery where nether doth a remouing from one place to another agree vnto it it is not laid downe and taken vp again that is it neuer departed or was seuered from the body but remaineth alwaies vnited vnto it Wherefore there must needs be in Christ besides his body his Godhead a true humane soule which did truely suffer and abide in Christ these chaunges and the like Secondly it is confirmed by diuine promises and prophecies For the Messias in the old Testament was promised to be such a one as should be the seede of the woman of Abraham Isaac Iacob c. But this Iesus the Sonne of the Virgine Mary is that promised Messias Therefore he must needs bee true man issuing of the bloode and posterity of the woman and the Fathers and therefore to haue been indeede begotten of the substance of Marie and to haue taken true flesh Thirdly The office of the Mediatour confirmeth the same The sinne of men in respect of gods truth and iustice could not bee punished in any other nature than in a humane nature which shoulde bee of the same kind with ours But in the Mediatour which is Jesus Christ alone our sinnes were to bee punished Therefore he must needes bee true man who hath humane flesh not created of nothing or borne else-whence but sprong from the bloud of Adam as well as ours Moreouer Jt was necessarie for Christ not onelie to take but also to retaine our nature for euer Because GOD hath decreed to bestowe and dooth bestowe the benefites which Christ by his death hath purchased for vs by this man CHRIST vpon them onely who are and remain engraffed into his masse and flesh as members into their head or braunches into their vine 1. Cor. 15.21 For since by man came death by man came also the resurrection of the dead Iohn 15.6 Jf a man abide not in me he is cast forth as a braunch and withereth Lastly Jt behoued Christ to be made and to continue our brother for euer that as he is flesh of our flesh so we also of the otherside might be flesh bones of his flesh and bones by the same spirite dwelling in vs. Eph. 5.30 We are members of his bodie of his flesh and of his bones Iohn 5.56 Eph. 4.12.16 Rom. 8.11 c. Wherefore except Christ had indeede taken our nature without which hee cannot be our brother we shoulde loose that comfort euer needefull and necessarie for vs which consisteth in the Brotherhood onely of Christ with vs I am of his flesh and of his bones 1 Obiection The flesh of Adam that is humane flesh issuing from Adam by generation vnto his posteritie is sinnefull The flesh of Christ is not sinnefull therefore the flesh of Christ is not the flesh of Adam Aunswere The Maior proposition hath a fallacie of the accident For it is not necessarie that of whatsoeuer the accident of a thing is denied of the same the thing also or subiect of the accident shoulde bee denied because an accident dooth so cleaue to the thing wherein it is as it may bee separated from it Sinne is not of the essence and nature of humane flesh for that was created pure of God but sinne came otherwise by the defection falling of our first parents from god Seeing then the flesh of Adam is sinfull only by an accident it foloweth that the flesh of Christ is onely in respect of that accident not the flesh of Adam but is as touching the substaunce the same flesh with the flesh of Adam Wherefore they deale like Sophisters who denie the flesh of CHRIST for that it is voide of sinne to bee the same in substaunce or Essence or kinde with the flesh of Adam For hee that coulde in the beginning create humane flesh pure of nothing is able also by his omnipotent power and speciall working so to forme it of the substaunce of the Virgin being a sinner as withall to let and stop any issuing of sinne thereunto that is to make it pure and holy There is no new or strange thing therefore if the omnipotent Lord hath tooke humane substance without the accident sinne into the vnity of his person Wherefore this their Argument shal be rather thus inuerted The flesh of Adam is true flesh Christs flesh is the flesh of Adam therefore Christs flesh is true flesh and by a consequent Christ is true man as also the office of the Mediatour did require that he should both bee and continue true man For seeing true men had sinned he was to be true man that shoulde make satisfaction Because it must bee one and the same Mediatour who must alwaies make intercession vnto the father for vs and hee must euer continue such that is true and very man 2 Obiection That which is conceiued and begotten of another is of the same substance with him The flesh of Christ was conceiued of the holie Ghost Therefore the flesh of Christ is no creature but came downe from heauen issuing from the substaunce of God Aunswere There is a fallacie in the diuers vnderstanding of the particle OF For that in the Maior signifieth the matter or material cause in the Minor the efficient cause onely that is That which is conceiued or begotten of another transfusing or passing his substance or part of his substaunce into the thing begotten this is of the same essence with him who begot it CHRISTS fleshe was conceiued by the Holy GHOST not that hee transfused or
passed his substaunce into the flesh begotten but because in miraculous sort hee formed in the Virgins wombe of her substance the body of Christ so that it should not be contaminated or polluted with original sinne For neither could Christ bee in that sort conceiued by the holy Ghost as that his fleshe shoulde issue from the spirits substance and that for these causes 1. Because if this were graunted then were he not borne man of the Virgin or propagated of the Virgins substance 2. Because God is not changed into flesh 3. Because the Word tooke the flesh but was not changed into it 3 Obiection Jn God are not two natures Christ is God Therefore there are not two natures in him Aunswere Meere particulars doe enforce nothing For if the Maior bee taken vniuersallie it is false whosoeuer is God in him are not two natures this generall proposition is false The Maior therefore is true as touching God the father and God the holy Ghost but not as touching God the sonne incarnate Replie 1. But nothing can bee added vnto God by reason of the great perfection and simplicitie of his nature Christ is God therefore the humanitie could not be added vnto his diuine nature Aunswere Nothing can be added to God whereby his essence may bee changed and perfected But in that God the Word ioined the humane nature vnto him personallie there came no chaunge or great perfection thereby to the Word which tooke it but to the nature which was taken Replie 2. Humane nature cannot come vnto him who dwelleth in the light that none can come vnto 1. Tim. 6.16 Aunswere This is true if so God doth not assume and take it vnto him Replie 3. But it is ignominious for God to be a creature Christ man is God Aunswere The chaunging of the Godhead into a creature woulde haue beene ignominious and reprochful vnto the Word but that the godhead shoulde bee vnited vnto a creature is is most glorious vnto god as who by that meanes hath demonstrated and made knowen his infinite both goodnesse and wisedome and iustice and power to the whole world 2 Whether Christ be one person or mo IN Christ are two perfect natures whole and distinct and double properties also and operations naturall but one person which subsisting in both these natures diuine and humane is truely designed by the concrete termes or voices of both natures For it was requisit that one the same should be Mediator both by merit by power But they who make two persons make also two Christs with Nestorius the one a man passiue and crucified the other God not crucified and onelie assisting the man Christ by his grace 1 Obiection Jn whom are two things which in themselues make two whole persons in him also are two persons But in Christ are two things which make two whole persons namely the Word which is by it selfe a person subsisting from all eternitie and the bodie and soule which beeing vnited make likewise a person Therefore in Christ are two persons Aunswere We denie that part of the Maior to wit That the bodie and humane soule doe as in other men so also in Christ concurre to make a created person of the humane nature and diuers from the person increate and eternall of the Woordc For albeit the humane nature in Christ compounded of a bodie and a reasonable soule is an indiuidual and particular or singular substance as being from other indiuiduals of the same nature distinguished by certaine properties and accidents yet neither was it or is it a person or subsistence For first A person is that which is not onelie a particular or singular thing but also it selfe consisteth and subsisteth in it selfe and by it selfe not susteined in or of anie other But CHRISTS humane nature now from the verie first beginning thereof dependeth and is susteined by the person of the Word For it was at once both formed and assumed of the Word into vnitie of person and made proper vnto the Word before and without which assumption or personal Vnion it neither was nor had beene nor shoulde be so that this Vnion being dissolued and loosed it must needes follow that that this flesh and this soule should be brought to nothing Therfore Christs humane nature hath not any subsistence or person proper vnto it selfe Secondly Jt belongeth to the nature or definition of a person that it be an indiuidual incommunicable and also no part of another But the nature which the Word took and assumed belongeth to the substance of one Christ a part also of whom it is after a sort Therefore in it selfe and by it selfe it is no person Reply That which appertaineth to the substance of a person and is a part thereof cannot be a person The word appertaineth and belongeth to the substaunce of Christ and is after a sort a part of him as well as the humanitie Therefore neither shall the word be by this reason a person Ans The Maior proposition if it bee vnderstood simplie or vniuersally is false For a reasonable soule existing in the bodie is not a person but a part of an humane person which the soule together with the bodie doth make yet notwithstanding the same soule being loosed from the bodie is a person by it selfe not that compound and mortall person whereof it was a part that is an humane person but a person most simple and immortall such as are the Angels because it subsisteth out of the bodie by it self neither is part of another So may it be said of the Word if it be constred aright with indifferencie that the Word in it selfe and by it selfe is not the whole person of Christ or the Mediatour as he is Christ and Mediatour that is is not that whole thing which is Christ who is not onely God but also man and yet is in it selfe and by it selfe the perfect and whole person of the Godhead truelie subsisting before the flesh was that is the onelie begotten sonne of God For this selfe same person existing in it selfe from euerlasting and remaining for euer most simple and vncompound is by the assuming of humane nature made in time after a sort compound that is the Word incarnate Wherefore in respect of the person considered in Vnion or incarnate the Word is rather considered as a nature and both it selfe and the humane nature may be called as it were the parts of whole Christ are so called also of many of the auncient Fathers which were sound in faith not that the flesh assumpted did adde any part to the subsistence of the Word or as if of the Persons of the Word and the humane nature as being vnperfect parts was made another perfect person of a certaine third Essence consubstantiall with neither of those natures of which it is compounded but because the person of the Word altogether one and the same which before the flesh was taken consisted in the diuine nature onely doth now after the taking
of the flesh subsist in two perfect natures diuine and humane suffering no commixtion confusion or mutation that is The person of the Mediatour is saide to bee constituted of two natures diuine and humane as it were of partes because those two are necessarilie required and doe concurre to the absoluing and accomplishing of the woorke of our redemption In this sense therefore both by auncient and latter Diuines and also by Schoolemen are vsed well and without daunger these Phrases and speeches Christs person is compounded The two nature are as it were the partes of Christ The person of Christ is consisteth is constituted is made of or in the two natures of God and man the two natures concurre come together into one person and subsistence they make one hypostasis or subsistence Both natures belong and concur to the substance of one Christ Both are of the substance of Christ the humanitie with the Worde or contrarie the diuine person or subsistence with the humane nature doth constitute or make the substance of one Christ Of the worde and the flesh assumpted as of substantial parts doth one Christ consist By these and the like phrases of speech vsed of this mysterie singular and surpassing all capacitie of mans wit the Orthodoxal that is men of a right and sound iudgement in pointes of faith will signifie and some way expresse this onely that the two natures are so vnited and linked in that one person of Christ as that they exist wholy in the same person or subsistence which is perfect and whole proper vnto the word from euerlasting by nature and is whole made in time the person of the humanitie also now assumpted and destitute of the proper personalitie thereof and this it is made by grace of vnion so that the diuine subsistence or person of the Word being in it selfe most simple and most perfect doth notwithstanding subsist truely and indiuiduallie in the two natures Wherefore seeing the thing it self is cleare agreed vpon among them who are of right iudgement and sound in faith wee are not odiously to iar about words especially since that concerning these supernatural thinges no wordes of humane speech can be found which way at all suffice for the expressing of them But as it is not well said the person took the person or the nature took the person So these speeches are true agreeable to faith The person tooke the nature Likewise the Nature tooke the Nature For the diuine Nature is not here considered absolutely or essentially but in the person of the word or personallie 2 Obiection That which subsisteth not by it self is more vnperfect than that which subsisteth by it selfe Christes Humanitie doth not subsist by it selfe and ours doth subsist by it selfe therefore Christs humanitie is more vnperfect than ours Aunswere First if that which subsisteth by it selfe be opposed to an accident which existeth by being in another this part of the Minor Proposition is false that Christs humanity doth not subsist by it selfe because that also is a substance But in this disputation Subsisting by it selfe is opposed to that which is indeede substance but yet dependeth of another and consisteth in another So we say that mankinde and the vniuersall or generall kindes of all thinges doe not subsist in themselues but in their singulars as the common nature of all men consisteth not by it selfe but in particular men Wherefore for further aunswere wee say that the Maior proposition beeing simplie and generallie taken is false For the soule of man beeing loosed from the bodie dooth subsist by it selfe the same while it remaineth in the bodie consisteth not by it selfe but vnited with the bodie Neither yet is it therefore to bee thought more vnperfect when this rather dooth most make to the perfection thereof For it is created of GOD to this purpose that it shoulde together with the bodie constistute and absolue the Essence of man and shoulde bee a part thereof So the soule and bodie of CHRIST were created to that ende as to bee the proper soule and bodie of the sonne of GOD and to depende personallie of him That therefore CHRISTS humanitie hath his subsistence not in a created person proper vnto it by nature but in the eternall hypostasis and person of the Worde it is so farre from bringing any imperfection thereunto for the subsistence or manner of subsisting doth not change the nature or essence of a thing that rather the greatest ornament glorie and eminencie commeth thereby vnto it and this is the chiefe and principall difference whereby it differeth and is discerned from all men and also from the blessed Angels 3 Obiection A dead and an euerliuing thing are not the same subsistent or person Christ was dead and yet euer-liuing Therefore hee is not one person Aunswere The Maior is either particular or beeing taken generallie it is false For one and the same subsistent truely and indiuidually subsisting in diuers natures euen as Christ is may bee saide dead and euerliuing as one and the same man is both mortall and immortall in respect of diuers natures whereof he is made and doth consist 3 What manner of Vnion this is of the two natures in Christ and how made THE Vnion of the flesh with the Worde was not made in the Essence or nature or in any essentiall property but in the person of the Word That this may be the better vnderstood we must obserue 1 What is to bee vnited in nature or into nature 2 What likewise to be vnited in person or into or vnto one person or according to subsistence 1. WHAT IS TO BE VNITED IN NATVRE FIRST Those thinges are saide to bee vnited in nature or Essence which as essentiall partes are coupled to the ful perfection or constitution of one nature or essence or kinde that is which make a perfect and whole essence or kinde and are one essence or substaunce So the soule and bodie are vnited to constitute or make the kinde or essence or nature of man that is are some one and perfect man Whatsoeuer thinges then are essentiall partes of a perfect thing they are saide to bee vnited in nature and vnto or into one nature Secondly those things also are saide to bee vnited in nature or essence which are one in nature essence or kinde or which are one essence or of one essence and nature or haue one common-essence or vnitie of nature or are ioined and agree in one essence So two men are saide to bee vnited in nature that is are one in kinde or of the same humane nature The three persons of the God-head are vnited in essence that is are one in Essence or are of one and the same diuine essence in number or haue the same Godhead in common So likewise To bee vnited in properties or perfections naturall or essentiall is to gette or haue the same or like equall properties essentiall Which is indeede nothing else than to bee made and bee one nature
the flesh taken or assumpted is truely vnited both to the person and to the nature of the Word For the person is not any seuerall thing or reallie differing from the essence but is the essence it selfe yet is it well saide that the flesh is vnited to the Word in person only and Likewise that the person onely of the Word is incarnate The reasons hereof are 1. Because not the Father nor the Holy Ghost were incarnate but the sonne onely 2. Because the first and neerest terme of this vnion is the person onely of the Word assuming and taking the flesh but not the Godhead For the person onely is proper vnto the Word the essence of the Godhead is common to him and the same with the Father and the Holy Ghost This is plainely taught by the 6. Toletan Councel Cap. 1. in these wordes The son onely tooke the humanitie in singularity of person not in vnitie of diuine nature that is in that which is proper vnto the son not which is common to the Trinitie And Rusticus in his dialog against the Acephalists Not god the Word by the diuine nature but the diuine nature by the persō of god the Word is said to be vnited to the flesh And a little after Wherefore both God the Woorde and his nature is incarnate hee by him selfe in that he is himselfe his nature not so but by the person God the Word then as touching himselfe is vnited to the flesh for he is made one person and one subsistence with the flesh but as touching his nature hee is conioyned rather than vnited because there remaine still two natures Wherefore either foule shamefull is the follie or notorious the malice and slaunder of certaine smatterers that of this verie orthodoxall and sound position not of the schoolmen onely but of Councels also and auncient Fathers The flesh is vnited to the Word in person onely or according to subsistence and this onely maketh the proper difference of personall vnion they inffer that by this meanes the diuine nature of the Woorde is drawen away from the personall vnion But let them againe and againe looke vnto it least by that their reall communicating of the essentiall properties of the Godhead which are the verie diuine essence common to the sonne with the Father and the holy Ghost which communication they will haue to bee the personall vnion which they define by it they ouerthrowe as well the eternall Godhead of Christ man as also the manhood it selfe and withall plainlie incarnate the whole Trinitie That then one and the same Christ is and is called truly and reallie the verie eternall God immense omnipotent creatour and true naturall man finite weake subiect to passions and sufferinges and a creature the onely cause is the vnitie of person subsisting in two natures perfect whole and reallie distinct diuine and humane For euerie indiuiduall and person is denominated or named of the natures or formes and their properties and operations cōcurring or subsisting in it Wherefore seeing in the same indiuiduall person of the Word doe truely subsist and belong to the substance of one Christ these two most diuers natures vnto one and the same Christ of which soeuer nature he be called do agree are affirmed of him all the attributes and properties both diuine and humane but after a diuerse manner For the attributes which agree to Christ in respect of the personall vnion are of two sorts some are attributes or properties of the natures others of his office The naturall attributes are those which are proper to ech nature whether the same bee essentiall belonging to the essence of the thing or which necessarily followe accompanie it without which the nature can not consist or accidentall which may bee away and wanting without the destruction of the nature The essentiall properties and perfections of the Godhead are to be eternall vncreate immense euerie where present not to be circumscribed in place omnipotent omniscient and the like which are the verie essence of the Godhead as also to create to giue the Holy Ghost to regenerate The essentiall attributes of the humanity are to haue a soule vnderstanding immortall and a body compounded of elements consisting of skinne bloud flesh bones veines and sinowes hauing a certaine and definite greatenesse figure proportion and collocation or localnes of partes and therefore to be circumscried in one place to be solid visible palpable and such like These Christ reteineth for euer because without these nothing can bee a humane nature The accidental properties of the humanitie are those infirmities which ensued vpon sinne which infirmities Christ together with the humane nature it selfe assumed and tooke without sinne For he tooke the forme of a seruant which by his resurrection and ascension hee laide down againe The attributes of his office are called those which agree not to one nature onely but to both together that is it agreeth to the whole person according to both natures as being the compound of both A rule to be obserued as touching the attributes or properties of both natures in Christ BOTH natures and their properties are truely and reallie affirmed of the person and of themselues interchangeably in concrete termes or voices yet so that the proper predicate which is proper vnto one nature is attributed to the person not according to both natures but according to that onely to which it is proper The reason is for that one and the same person subsisting in two natures hath and reteineth for euer reallie the properties of both natures and also because one and the same person is signified by the concrete voices of both natures As therefore one the same man is liuing and corporeal according to diuerse natures and the corporeal is liuing by the soule onely and contrarilie the liuing is corporeall by the bodie onely For both soul and bodie are of the substance and essence of the same man So likewise one the same Christ is God eternal immense omnipotent according to the God-head onely is man the Virgines sonne created finite infirme and did suffer according to his humanity onely So likewise God is man borne of a Virgine annointed with the holy Ghost and suffered according to the flesh And man is God eternal creatour omnipotent giueth the holie Ghost not according to the humane nature but according to the diuine For the sense and meaning of these speaches is The person which is God creatour of thinges omnipotent by reason of the God-head the selfe-same person is man a creature infirme by reason of the flesh subsisting in it But notwithstanding one nature and the properties thereof whether they bee vttered in abstract or in concrete voices cannot be affirmed of the other nature or forme truly and really The reason is Because the vnion is not made in the nature that is two natures are not made one nature and because in neither nature the properties of the other doe reallie exist neither can exist
For the natures doe not communicate each to other their essentiall properties as neither doe these impart their essence that is one nature doth not receiue the properties of both natures Wherefore these kindes of speaches are false The Godhead is the manhoode or man was conceiued borne did suffer was dead and againe these The Man-hoode is the God-head or God is eternal immense vncircumscribed in place omnipotent giueth the holie Ghost dooth regenerate For al these are no more true and to be admitted than those A soule is a bodie or corporeal mortal visible and a body is a soul or a spirit inuisible immortal 1 Obiection The whole person of Christ is really omnipotent euerie where eternal c. The humanitie and the God-head are the whole person of Christ. Therefore both are reallie omnipotent euerie where eternal c. Aunswere This argument the Vbiquetaries who most of all ground vpon it and often vse it haue borowed from Schwenkefieldeans who commonly in their bookes reason thus Whole Christ is the natural onelie begotten Sonne of God is the true and the same GOD of the same infinite power and maiestie with the eternall Father conceiued borne of the Virgine suffered was dead rose againe ascended into heauen sendeth the Holie Ghost But both natures belong to the whole person of Christ Therefore Christ according to his humanitie also is the natural Sonne of god begotten of the substance of the Father from euerlasting and con-substantiall with the Father and the same GOD with the Father who is Creatour of all If then the Vbiquetaries collection bee lawfull and sound this doubtlesse of the Swenkefieldeans is lawfull also and sound but if the Swenkefieldeans collection bee corrupt and smelling of Eutyches heresie then that of the Vbiquetaries cannot bee at all good and sound But indeede both collections are Eutychian and Sophisticall they are Eutychian because two natures which are made equall in properties essentiall or which get and haue the same or equall essential properties are indeede made one nature and substance or are two substaunces of one nature Both opinions take cleane away the nature of the humanitie transform it into the God-head but the latter dooth further make two persons in Christ of the same nature It is also Sophisticall because whether the person of Christ be considered in it selfe as it was a person being but one and perfect that before the incarnation subsisting in one nature onely or whether it bee considered as it is incarnate and now subsisting in two natures yet stil the transition and passing from the person to the natures is faultie and Sophistical For neither is it necessary that what is truly in and attributed vnto a person the same also should bee reallie in al things concurring in that person and bee affirmed of all The reason is because the parts or natures though vnited in the same person yet retain their properties operations vnconfounded Wherefore that which is proper vnto the godhead cannot agree vnto the person in respect of the flesh also but only in respect of the godhead Whole man vnderstandeth discourseth and hath motion of wil ye◠he doth not this by his finger or body but by his mind only whole man is mortal and doth go eat and drink yet none but a mad man or an epicure will therefore say that the soule also is mortal or doth goe eat and drink So not halfe but the whole person of Christ was before Abraham and from euerlasting did create and dooth preserue all thinges and tooke flesh But the fleshe neither was from euerlasting neither did create nor dooth preserue all thinges nor tooke flesh but was created and being assumpted and taken is susteined of the Word and in it So whole christ was wounded dead yet not his Godhead nor his soul This is wel learnedly declared explicated by Damascene lib. 3. ca. 7. in these words Whole christ is perfect GOD but not THE WHOLE of Christ that is not both natures are God For he is not god only but also man And WHOLE christ is perfect mā but not THE WHOLE of christ is man For he is not man only but god too For THE WHOLE signifieth the nature WHOLE the person Wherefore if the Vbiquetaries wil at al haue the illation enforcing of their conclusiō on these premisses to be necessary The Maior propositiō must be expoūded after this sort The person is god creator omnipotent eueriwhere whole that is as concerning all that which it is or in which it dooth subsist or which doth belong vnto it But the Maior taken in this sense is false most absurd as was shewed a litle before For the true sense thereof is this The person is euery where whole that is without diuision or sundering of natures or subsisting vndiuidably in two natures But the humanity is not that whole subsisting in two natures Not euery thing then that agreeth really to the person agreeth also really to the flesh And albeit the person doth subsist in the humanitie the God-head mutually vnited one to the other yet as it hath beene said it is not hereof enforced that because the person is euery where therefore the humanity should be in proper substance present euery where For this is proper to the godhead neither is it really communicated to any creature or is in any Reply The diuinity is one present in al pleces but especially with the church The diuinity is but halfe christ Therefore only halfe christ is present with the church Answere 1. ther is an ambiguity doubtfulnes in the words halfe christ For if by halfe christ they vnderstād one nature which is vnited to the other in the same person the whole reasō may be granted namely that not both but one nature onely of christ though vnited to th' other that is his godhead is present with vs al things in his proper substance in al places at al times But they by halfe christ vnderstand craftily sophistically the one nature separated from the other as if the godhead were made to be with vs bare naked not incarnat But in this sense the Minor is false the Vbiquetaries own inuētiō For the same Word by reasō of the immēsnes infinitie of his essēce is whole euerywhere without his manhood yet so that he withall is abideth whole in his manhood personally vnited thereūto Wherefore the Word nether is nor worketh any where not vnited to the flesh albeit the flesh because it hath not an infinit essence but reteineth it circūscribed in place is not made to be present substātially in al those places in which the word incarnat or the word mā is 2. There is an ambiguity also double significatiō in the word present For the presēce wherby christ is presēt with his church is not of one kind Wherefore if the Maior be vnderstood of the presence of his substance in al places of his being amongest
proper to flesh created finit but to a nature infinit omnipoteÌ„t existing froÌ„ euerlasting Therfore christ promiseth the holy ghost to his disciples which is the spirite of trueth wisdome feare praier grace c. But although after that maner which hath bin spoken of the god-head only christ by reason of his god-head doth behold do al things is adored of vs yet his humanity also doth behold vnderstand hear our necessities desires coÌ„plaints praiers yet after another sort that is not of it selfe but by the godhead reueiling shewing our desires to the humane vnderstanding which is vnited to it And fuâ—der it performeth those things which we craue both by the efficacy of his merit by intercession made incessaÌ„tly to the father for vs whereby he wil obteineth of his father all blessings for vs by the force and omnipotency not of his flesh but of his godhead vnited thereunto by which christ man doth effectually apply to vs those benefits which he hath obtained for vs of his father Now to acknowledge when we worship Christ the Mediatour these things in him to profes the same both in words gestures actioÌ„s is the honor which is du is exhibited by vs to his humanity by reason of the god-head vnited thereto yet so that this veneratioÌ„ of the humanity is not separated froÌ„ the honor which agreeth to Christ according to his Godhead For with one the same particular indiuiduall inuocation worship we speak to honor whole christ god man according to the properties of both natures which he reteineth will haue also now in his glory for euer to be attributed to him vnitely but yet distinctly that is As the persoÌ„ office of the mediator so the adoratioÌ„ or worship is coÌ„pound hauing parts whereof some agree to the godhead some to the flesh as in the office so also in the honor of the person the properties operations of the natures are not separated nether yet confounded but being vnited are distinguished Wherefore as it doth not folow The godhead in Christ is redeÌ„ptres by reason of the flesh assuÌ„pted Therefore it is also subiect to sufferings mortal did suffer was dead So is there no necessity in this Vbiquitary argumeÌ„t Christs humanity is adored by reason of his god-head Therefore the same is also really omniscieÌ„t omnipoteÌ„t after the same maner to be adored as is the godhead The reason is because of the fellowship or coniunction of office honor in the person the same properties operations in natures are wrongly heretically inferred The sum of al is That christs humanity is adored by reason of his godhead coÌ„meth not thereof as if his humanity also were really omniscient and omnipotent as is the God-head For by reason of these other like properties is the godhead only inuocated but because it doth truely know vnderstaÌ„d hear our necessities cogitations desires praiers the diuine intelligence vnderstanding which is vnited to it reâ—â—iling and opening them vnto it And also because what we craue aâ— christs hands the same it effectually performeth not by the bones sinowes hands fingers feete but by the force and power of the same God-head Furdermore that maner form of speaking whereby the properties of one nature are really attributed to the person denominated of the other nature or of both natures is vsuallie called the communicating of the properties Likewise the communicating of names because the names and attributes of both natures are affirmed of the same person and of themselues enterchaungeably by reason of the vnitie of person consisting of both natures The communicating of properties hath some resemblance of the figure in speech called Synecdoche and is termed by manie Synecdoche because that is affirmed of the whole person which agreeth vnto it onelie in respect of one of the natures as a part It is also called a mutuall and enterchaungeable attribution because as humane properties are attributed vnto god in respect of the humanitie so diuine are attributed vnto man in respect of the Diuinitie As God suffered man is omnipotent So likewise the communicating of names For Man is God and God is Man by reason of the personall vnion of both natures A rule to be obserued concerning the attributes or properties of the office of Christ Mediatour THE names of office and honour agree vnto the whole person in respect of both natures keeping still the differences in natures of properties and operations These attributes are rightlie affirmed of subiectes both concrete and abstract that is both of the person and of the natures For it is well said The God-head quickeneth the Man-hood quickeneth And God or man quickneth The attributes of office are to be Mediatour to make intercession to redeeme to saue to iustifie sanctifie purge from sinnes to be Lord and Head of the Church to be woorshipped to heare and such like These offices require the properties and operations of both natures not separated neither yet confounded but conioined and distinct For euen for this verie cause was it necessarie that the two natures should be vnited in Christ Mediatour that what neither nature could doe being set a part in the work of our redemption that Christ subsisting in both ioined together might doe and accomplish by both As therefore the natures themselues so their properties also or faculties of woorking and operations are proper and remaine diuerse and distinct yet so that they concurre to the effectuating and working of one effect or work and benefit as parts and communicated labours For albeit the natures doe alwaies labor work together in the office and benefits of the Mediator nether without other yet doth not therefore one worke the same which the other doth But each woorketh according to his property force of woorking onely that which is proper to each nature not that also which belongeth vnto the other As neither the soule doth that which is proper vnto the body neither the body that which is proper vnto the soule but the same man doth woorke some one worke by his body and soul each dooing their proper function So likewise the humanity doth neuer accomplish that which is proper vnto the God-head nor the Godhead that which is proper vnto the manhood but the same Christ executeth and perfourmeth one and the same office benefit by both natures which he hath in him as parts of his person the Worde woorking according to the propertie thereof what belongeth to the Worde and the fleshe in like manner executing according to the peculiar and proper faculties thereof not according to others that which belongeth to the flesh For the properties operations proper to each nature are not common to both natures but to the same person consisting of both natures Wherefore in such like phrases of speech concerning Christes office which are called of the auncient 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that
flesh câ—nsubstantiall with men we doe not affirme him to bee according to the fleshe consubstantial with God For as according to the spirit he is not consubstantial with vs For according to this he is consubstantial with God So of the other side he is not according to the flesh coessentiall with god but according to this he is consubstantiall with vs. And as wee pronounce these to bee distinct diuerse one from the other not to bring in a diuision of one vndiuided person but to note the distinction and vnconfoundablenes of the natures and properties of the Word and the flesh so we affirme and worship those as vnited which make to the manner of the vndiuided vnion or composition Vigilius Lib. 4. against Eutyches IF there be one nature of the Word the flesh how then seeing the Word is euery where is not the flesh also found euery where For when it was in the earth it was not verily in heauen and now because it is in heauen it is not verily in the earth and in so much it is not as that as touching it wee looke for Christ to come from heauen whom as touching the Word we beleeue to bee in the earth with vs. Wherefore according to your opinion either the Word is coÌ„teined in place with the flesh or the flesh is euery where with the Word where as one nature doth not receiue any contrarie or diuers thing in it selfe and it is a thing diuerse and far vnlike to be circumscribed in place and to be euerie where and seeing the Word is euerie where and the flesh is not euerie where it is apparent that one and the same Christ is of both natures and is euerie where as touching the nature of his Godhead but is not euerie-where as touching the nature of his manhood is created and hath no beginning is subiect to death and cannot die the one he hath by the nature of the Word whereby hee is god the other by the nature of his flesh whereby the same God is man Wherefore that one son of God and the same made the sonne of man hath a beginning by the nature of his flesh and hath no beginning by the nature of his Godhead was created by the nature of his flesh and was not created by the nature of his godhead circumscribed in place by the nature of his flesh and not conteined in any place by the nature of his Godhead is lower also than the Angels by the nature of his flesh and is equal with the father according to the nature of his God-head died by the nature of his flesh and neuer died by the nature of his Godhead This is the Catholique faith and confession which the Apostles deliuered the martyrs established and the faithfull hitherto holde and mainetaine Now haue wee in few wordes expounded those articles of the Apostolique creede which intreate of the person of Christ and haue withall declared in the exposition thereof those things which are necessarie for vs to knowe both of the diuinitie of Christ and of his humane nature which was taken by the Word of the seede of Dauid vnited personally with the Word by the vertue of the holy ghost and begotten in maruelous nanner of the Virgines substance And it was requisite not to suffer that any sinne should passe or bee deriued into his substance 1. Because hee was to satisfie for sinne 2. Because it was not conuenient or meet that the Woorde the sonne of God should take a nature defiled with sinne To beleeue then in the son of God conceiued by the holy ghost is to beleeue 1. That he was made man after a marueilous manner and that hee was made one Christ of a diuine and an humane nature 2. That hee being so holily conceiued and borne doth purchase for vs the right and power to bee the sonnes of God Because this person is sufficient able to recouer for vs our lost righteousnes and to bestowe it on vs. For hee is vnited with the Worde that is hee is true and naturall God and man such as the Mediatour ought to bee Hee will also performe this because he was borne to this end euen to sanctifie vs. Of al these euerie one of vs may certainlie collect and conclude That this Christ is our Mediatour And the reason of this collection and consequence is Because by this that he is the only begotten Sonne of God it is manifest that Christ is true God consubstantial coeternal and equall with the Father By his holy conception and natiuitie it is also manifest that hee is true man and that perfectly iust and vnited with the God-heade or Woord and such a one was it requisite our Mediatour should be OF CHRISTES HVMILIATION THE course of order requireth that now consequentlie we expound and declare those Articles which treat of the office of Christ and first of al of his humiliation or humbling which is the former part of Christes office whereunto belong these Articles Hee suffered vnder Pontius Pilate was crucified dead buried descended into hel After we haue expounded these we wil come vnto the rest of the Articles which speake of his glorification which is the other part of Christs office HE SVFFERED VNDER PONTIVS PILATE I Beleeue in Christ which suffered that is I beleeue 1. That Christ froÌ„ the verie moment of his conception susteined calamities mesâ—ries of al sorts for my sake 2. That at that his last time he suffered all the most bitter tormentes both of bodie and soule for my sake 3. That he felt the horrible and dreadfull wrath of God thereby to make recompence for mine and others sinnes and to appease his ire and wrath against mankind These two are different To beleeue that christ suffered and to beleeue in Christ which suffered For that is to haue onely an historical faith of Christes passion neither to repose anie confidence in him but this is to beleeue not onlie that Christ suffered but also to repose and place our trust and confidence in Christs suffering and Passion OF CHRISTES PASSION THE Passion of Christ onelie doth followe next his conception and natiuitie 1. Because in his Passion consisteth our saluation 2. Because his whole life was a Passion suffering and calamitie Yet notwithstanding many things maie and ought to be obserued out of the storie of the whole race of his life on earth For that 1. doth shew This person to be the promised Messias seeing in him concur and are fulfilled all the Prophecies 2. That storie is a consideration or meditation of that humility or obedience which hee perfourmed vnto his Father The chiefe questions of Christes Passion are these 1 What Christ suffered 2 Whether he suffered according to both natures 3 What was the impellent cause of Christes Passion 4 What the final cause or end thereof 1 WHAT CHRIST SVFFERED BY the name of Passion is vnderstoode the whole humiliation or the obedience of his whole humiliation all the miseries
tormentes ignominies paines and grifes vnto all which Christ was subiect and obnoxious as wel in soule as in body from the point of his natiuity vntill the howre of his death resurrection Mat. 26.38 My soul is very heauy euen vnto the death Mat. 27.46 My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Isa 53.4 Surelie he hath carried our sorrowes But principally by the name of Passion is signified the last act of the humiliation and pains of Christ the chiefe part of which his pains and dolours was in his soule wherein hee felt the ire and wrath of God against sinne which also was the cause why he so trembled and shooke at death was so faint-harted in his death whereas other Martyrs of Christ haue susteined stoutlie and couragiouslie extreme torments For the torments punishments of others haue no proportion with the torments and punishments of Christ For others as Stephen Laurence and the like susteined only corporall paines and torments but were vpheld within by the holy ghost But Christ suffered the paines both of body soule For he suffered first our infirmity that is the infirmities of humane nature he hungered thirsted was wearie was stroken with sadnesse and griefe 2 Hee suffered pouertie Luk 9.58 The sonne of man hath not whereon to lay his head 3 He suffered infinite iniuries contumelies slaunders layings in wait for him backbitings reproches blasphemies annihilating and contempt Psalm 22.7 I am a worme and not a man Isay 53.2 He hath neither forme nor beutie when wee shall see him there shall bee no forme that we should desire him 4 Hee suffered the Tentations of the diuel Mat. 4.1 He. 4.15 He was in all thinges tempted in like sort 5 Hee suffered the death of the bodie and that reprochefull and contumelious euen the death of the Crosse 6 He suffered the most grieuous torments of soule that is he found the sense and feeling of the wrath of God against sinne to be laide on him Hereof it was that he cried with a loude voice My God why hast thou forsaken me as if he should saie why doost thou not driue and put away from me so great torments For he signifieth by those words not a diuulsion or separation of his Godhead from his manhood but the differring and delaying of help and succour We see then what and howe great thinges Christ hath suffered for vs which are therefore proposed vnto vs and sette before our eyes to giue vs to consider 1. The history it selfe of Christs passion agreeing with Gods sacred oracles and prophecies 2. The cause or fruites of Christes Passion 3. His example that wee are also to enter into eternal life and heauenlie glorie by death as did Christ and these three thinges are especially to be considered in Christs Passion Obiection There is no proportion betweene temporal punishment and eternal Christ suffered only temporal paines and punishmentes Therefore he could not satisfie gods iustice Aunswere There is no proportion betweene temporall and eternall punishment if they bee considered as beeing both in the same degree and in the same subiect Question But how may the raunsome of one person answere for the sins of an infinit number of men Aunswere It may and that for these two causes 1. Because he is true God which suffered Obiection But god cannot die and suffer Aunswere God cannot suffer in that he is God Or further we graunt that Christ was not God in that he suffered died Obiect Christ is not God in that he suffered Therefore it is false which is saide Acts 20.28 That God hath purchased the Church with his owne bloode Ans This was spoken by a communicating of the properties but this was in the person not in the nature that is That person which is God and man purchased the Church The communicating of properties is to attribute that to the whole person which is proper vnto one nature and this is attributed in a concrete voice not in an abstract because the concrete voice signifieth the person in which are both natures and the property of that nature whereof some thing is affirmed But the abstract name signifieth the nature which is in the person but not the person And therefore it is that nothing hindereth why that which is proper to one nature may not bee affirmed of the whole person so that propertie it selfe be in the person But contrarie of the abstract name onely the properties of that nature are affirmed vnto which they properly belong As of the God-heade which is the abstract name no propertie of the man-hoode maie be affirmed but onelie the properties of the God-heade because the God-heade signifieth not the person which hath both natures but onelie the diuine nature it selfe But of God which is the concrete name the properties not of the God-head only but of the manhood also may be affirmed because God signifieth not the diuine nature but the person which hath both the diuine nature and humane The second cause why the raunsome of one person may aunswere for the sinnes of an infinite number is the grieuousnesse of his punishment because hee suffered that which wee should haue suffered for euer His Passion therefore is equiualent to euerlasting punishment yea it surpasseth it For that God should suffer is more than that all the creatures shoulde perish euerlastinglie 2 According to which nature Christ suffered CHRIST suffered not according to both natures neither according to his God-head but according to his humane nature onely both in body and soule For his diuine nature is immortal Now he so suffered according to his humanity that by his death and Passion he made satisfaction for infinite sinnes of men Question But why could not his God-head suffer Answere Because it is not changeable neither can that which is life it selfe dy This susteined vpheld the humane nature in paines after death restored it to life Obiection God purchased the Church with his owne bloode Actes 20.28 Therefore the god-head suffered Aunswere It doth not follow because an argument from the concrete which is God to the abstract which is the God-heade is if no consequence Againe the kind of affirmation is altered God is said to haue died by a figure of speech which is Synecdoche vsed whē we signifie the whole by a part as whole Christ by God and by a communicating of the properties But when it is said The god-head died that admitteth no figure as beeing a meere abstract The concrete signifieth the subiect or person hauing the nature or forme But the abstract signifieth the bare nature and forme onelie Wherefore the argument doth not follow A man is compounded of the elementes and is corporeal Therefore his soul also is corporeal This cannot follow Because al things agree not to the forme which agree to the subiect the soule is the forme of man man is the essentiall subiect of the soule Wherefore neither doth it follow Christ God died Therefore Christs God-heade died For
death of the onely begotten Sonne of God 2 That it might be an exasperating of the punishment and so wee so much the more confirmed in a true faith when wee consider Christ by this kinde of punishment to haue taken vpon him our gilt euen our punishment also and curse according to that Cursed is euerie one that hangeth on tree Deut. 21.23 Gal. 3.13 3 That the trueth might answere according to the types and figures so we might know the types to be fulfilled in Christ For 1 The sacrifices which shadowed the sacrifice of Christ were hung vpon trees thereby to signifie that Christ should be fastned on a tree and accomplishing his sacrifice offer a holy sacrifice vnto his Father 2 The sacrifices being lifted vp on high before they were burned did signifie the exalting and listing vp of Christ on the Altar of the Crosse 3 The same was shadowed in Isaack who being laid on wood was to haue beene sacrificed of his Father 4 The brasen Serpent which Moses set vp vpon a pole in the wildernesse depainteth this kind of punishment Christ himselfe interpreted of himselfe this type of the brasen Serpent Joh. 3.14 DEAD I Beleeue in Christ dead that is I beleeue Christ not onely to haue suffered extreame torments for my sake but also death it selfe hath by his death obtained for me remission of sinnes and reconciliation with God consequently also the holy Ghost who beginneth in me a new life that I may againe bee made the Temple of God and at length attaine vnto euerlasting life wherein I shall woorship and magnifie God for euer OF CHRISTS DEATH THE chiefe Questions hereof are 1 How Christ is said to haue bin dead 2 Whether it was requisite and necessarie that Christ should die 3 What are the fruits of Christs death 1 HOW CHRIST IS SAID TO HAVE BEENE DEAD IT is needful to moue this question because of the heretikes who haue depraued the sense of this article Marcion denied that hee died indeed as also hee affirmed the whole ordinarie dispensation and ministerie of the humane nature in Christ and all those thinges which hee did vndergoe for vs to haue bin but imaginarie and that hee onely seemed to bee as a man Nestorius separated the two natures in Christ neither would haue the sonne of God but man onely to haue died Doe not boast thou Jewe saieth Nestorius thou hast not crucified God The Vbiquitaries beleeue that the humanitie of Christ from the moment of his incarnation was so indowed with all the properties of the Godhead as that only in this the humanitie differeth from the Godhead that the humanitie hath by an accident whatsoeuer the Godhead hath by and of it selfe Hereof it commeth that they imagin that Christ was in the time of his death yea when hee was inclosed in the Virgins wombe in heauen and eueriewhere not onely as touching his Godhead but with his bodie too This is it which they call the forme of God Wherefore against all these wee affirme that Christ died truely and corporallie euen by a true diuulsion separation of his soule from his bodie so that not onely his soule and body were not together euerie where but were not together in one place Mat. 27.50 Thē Iesus cried again with a loud voice yeelded vp the Ghost Mar. 15.37 Iesus cried with a loude voice and gaue vp the Ghost Luk 23.46 Father into thy hands I commend my spirit And when hee had saide these words hee gaue vp the Ghost Iohn 19.30 Hee bowed his head and gaue vp the Ghost But yet this is further to be added that although his soule was separated from his bodie yet the Word notwithstanding did not forsake neither bodie nor soule but remained neuerthelesse ioyned both to bodie and soule and therefore the two natures in Christ were not diuelled or sundered by that diuulsion of the soule and bodie Obiection Why then cried hee Mat. 27.46 My God my God why hast thou forsaken mee Aunswere Because of his delay and differring of help and succour For the two natures in Christ ought not to haue beene diuelled or sundered because it is written God hath purchased the Church with his owne bloude And hee was to be the sonne of God who shoulde die for our sinnes that hee might bee a sufficient price for them Hereby also it doth clearely appeare that The vnion of both natures in Christ is no Vbiquitie For the soul being separated from the bodie was not in the graue with the bodie and by a consequent not eueriewhere because that which is euerie where can neuer bee separated Obiection But as vertue that is his diuinitie is saide to haue gone out of him so also hee gaue vp the Ghost Aunswere There is a dissimilitude in these Because the diuinity remaining vnited with the humane nature yet did worke abroade without it The soule did depart from the bodie The reason of this dissimilitude is because the act of his diuinitie is increate and infinite but the act and power of his soul finite and created 2 Whether it was requisite and necessary that Christ should die IT was requisite and necessarie that Christ should die 1. In respect of the iustice of God that so his iustice might be satisfied which required the death of men by whom it was violated For the hurting offending of the greatest good is to bee expiated with the greatest punishment or with the vtmost destruction of nature that is with the death of the giltie condemned for sinne according to that Rom. 6.23 The wages of sinne is death Now it was requisite that the sonne of God should die that hee might bee a sufficient ransome for our sinnes For no creature coulde haue sustained such a punishment as should haue beene equiualent to eternall punishment and yet withall should haue beene temporal Obiection They haue deserued eternall punishment whosoeuer are not reconciled to God by Christ. Therefore the soules ought not to be separated from their bodies that they might suffer eternal damnation Aunswere It dooth not followe but this rather That therefore both bodie and soule must bee together that they maie suffer it which at length shall so come to passe 2 Jn respect of gods truth that the truth of GOD maie bee satisfied For GOD threatned and denounced death when euer wee sinned which denouncing was to bee fulfilled after sin was once committed And this is that commination or threatning pronounced by God himselfe Gen. 2.17 In the daie that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death Obiection But Adam did not presently die Aunswere Truely he died spirituallie eternal death and now was dead I hard saith he Gen. 3.10 thy voice There was a terrour in him and a feeling of Gods wrath a strife with death the losse of al the giftes both of body and mind But there followed the equity moderation and lenitie of the Gospell For God had not expressely saide that hee shoulde certainelie die wholy and that
dead corps A dead body is indeed void of sense and feeling but yet notwithstanding ignominious is it for the bodie to be committed vnto the earth as it is said To dust shalt thou returne And as Christes resurrection from the dead and death is a part of his glore so his burial that is the debasing of his bodie to bee in the same state with other dead carcases is a part of his humiliation 3 A certaine type was to be fulfilled It was foretolde by the type of Ionas remaining 3. daies in the Whale That the Messias should be buried Therefore for the fulfilling of this type he ought also to be buried and to remaine vntill the third day in the graue 4 He would be buried that he might not be afraid of the graue but might knowe that our head Christ Iesus had laid open the waie vnto vs by the graue and death to celestiall glorie and therefore shall wee bee raised out of the graue albeit we die giue vp the Ghost 5 That we might knowe how we are indeed deliuered from death For in his death a testimonie and record whereof is his buriall consisteth our saluation 6 That it might be apparent and manifest as concerning his resurrection euen that hee was able indeede to rise againe and to shew that hee hath ouercome death and that his resurrection was not imaginarie but the resurrectiō of a reuiuing corps 7 That we beeing spirituallie dead that is to sin might rest from sinne Rom. 6.4 Wee are buried with Christ by Baptisme into his death that like as Christ was raised vp from the dead by the glory of the father so we also should walke in newnesse of life HE DESCENDED INTO HEL I Beleeue in Christ who descended into Hel that is I beleeue that Christ for me sustained in his soule infernall hellish pains tormentes that exceeding ignominie which is due vnto the wicked in Hell that thereby I might not descend into hell and that I might neuer bee forced to suffer them all which otherwise I should suffer in hell eternallie but that of the contrarie rather I might ascend with Christ into heauen and there enioie with him exceeding happinesse and glory for euer and euer This is the vse and profite of this Article of Christes descension into hel Now wee are a little more at large to declare what is the meaning of that Article or what is properlie that Descension of Christ into hell Hell in Scripture is taken three waies For it signifieth 1. The graue Genesis 42.38 Then yee shall bring my graie heade with sorrowe vnto hell Psalm 16.10 Thou wilt not leaue my soule in Hell neither wilt thou suffer thy holy one to see corruption 2. The place of the damned As in the storie of the rich man and Lazarus 3. The paines of hell that is the terrours and tormentes of the soule and conscience Psal 116.3 The griefes of hel caught me 1. Sam. 2.6 The Lord bringeth downe to hel and raiseth vp that is into exceeding pains and torments out of which afterwards he again deliuereth In this third sense is it taken in this Article for it cannot be vnderstoode of the graue because there goeth before He was buried If anie say that this latter Article is an exposition of the former hee saith nothing For as often as two speeches expressing the same thing are ioyned together so that the one is an exposition of the other it is meete that the latter bee more cleare and open than the former againe it is not likely in this so briefe succinct a confession that the same thing should be twise spokē in other words Neither cā this place be vnderstood of the place of the damned For Christ said Into thy hands I commend my spirit to the Theef This day shalt thou be with me in Paradise as if he should saie This day shalt thou be with me as touching my soule in Paradise that is in the place of euerlasting saluation or happinesse where thou shalt being deliuered from al tormentes enioie most pleasaunt quiet and repose This is not to bee vnderstoode of the Godheade of Christ as if that shoulde bee the same daie together with the soule of the Theefe in Paradise For the God-head is and shall bee euery where But thou shalt be in Paradise with me euen whom thou seest hanging on the crosse The descension of Christ therefore into Hell signifieth 1 those extreme torments and griefes which christ suffered in his soule namely the wrath of God against sinnes and that such as the damned feele partly in this life partlie in the life to come 2. The Exceeding and extreme ignomine and reproche which christ suffered That Christ suffered these thinges is prooued by the Testimonie of Dauid before alleaged The griefes of Hell caught mee which is sayde of Christ in the person of Dauid There are other the like sayings whereby the same is prooued Isa 53.10 The Lord would breake him and make him subiect to infirmities Mat. 26.38 My soule is verie heauie euen vnto the death The same doo those his vexations also shewe in the garden when he swet blood Isai 53.6 The Lord hath laid vpon him the iniquitie of vs all Therefore hee crieth out Mat. 27.49 My God my god why hast thou forsaken mee The same is proued also by this reason euen because hee ought to suffer not onlie in body but in soule to for vs that hee might also redeeme our soules Obiection 1. The articles of faith ought to be vnderstood properlie Aunswere True except an article beeing taken according to the proper signification be disagreeing from other places of scripture But this Article of Christs descension into Hell beeing taken properlie is much repugnant to that saying of Christ Iohn 19.30 It is finished For if Christ fulfilled and finished all the parts of our redemption on the Crosse there was no cause why hee should descend into Hell that is vnto the place of the damned Obiection 2. Hee descended into Hell and that by a locall descension as the papists affirm to deliuer the Fathers thence Answere 1. Wee denie that christ descended locallie into Hell and that for this reason Jf christ did locallie descend into Hell hee descended either as touching his Godhead or as touching his soule or as touching his body Not as touching his Godhead For that is euerie where Not as touching his soule because he saith Father into thy handes I commend my spirite Replie But hee might also bee in the hand of his Father that is in his Fathers protection euen in Hell According to that Psalm 139.8 If I lie downe in Hell thou art there that is there also will god haue care ouer mee and there also will hee keepe me that I perish not Answere One place enterpreteth another for he had said before vnto the Theefe This daie shalt thou be with mee in Paradise that is in the place and state of the blessed where both
are free from these paines that is hee speaketh of felicity and liberty which is not in Hell Whereupon also it is clear that Christ spake this to the Theefe not of his God-head but of that which suffered which was his soul For the godhead was with the Theefe neither did Christ suffer or was deliuered as touching his God-heade but as touching his soule Lastly Christ descended not into Hell locally as touching his bodie because his body was in the graue neither rose from any other place but from the graue It followeth therefore that this article cannot bee vnderstood of a locall descension into Hell Aunswere 2 Albeit it were true that Christ descended locally into Hell yet hee shoulde not haue descended for this cause which they imagine as namely to deliuer the Fathers Which also is prooued by this reason If Christ descended locally into Hel he descended either to suffer or to deliuer Not to suffer because now all thinges were finished on the Crosse as christ himselfe also hanging on the Crosse said Jt is finished He descended not to deliuer the Fathers 1 Because he did this before in suffering for them on earth 2 Hee did the same by the power and efficacie of his God-heade from the verie beginning of the worlde not by the descension of his soule or bodie into Hel. 3 The Fathers were not in Limbo Therefore they could not be deliuered thence As it is saide Luk. 16.46 Betweene you and vs there is a great gulfe set so that they which would go from hence to you cannot neither can they come from thence to vs. And in the same place Lazarus is said to bee in Abrahams bosome not in Limbo The soules of the iust are in the hand of God 3 Objection Christ indeede did not descend into Hell either to suffer or to deliuer but as some wil to shewe the Diuell and Death his victorie and so to strike a terrour into them Which they say is confirmed by that place of Peter 1. Pet. 3.19 By the which he also went preached vnto the spirits that are in prison which were in time passed disobedient Answere That for this cause Christ descended into Hell is not found in scripture that place of Peter is thus to be vnderstood Christ went that is beeing sent from the beginning of the Father vnto the Church by his spirite that is by his God-head and vnto the spirites that are now in prison that is in Hell hee preached in time passed when as yet they liued were disobedient namely before the flud and in the time of Noah inuiting them to repentance So is also another saieng of Peter to be vnderstood 1. Pet. 4.6 The Gospel was also preached vnto the dead That is vnto those which are now dead or were then dead when Peter wrote this and who then liued when the Gospel was preached vnto them Reply Christ descended into the lowest partes of the earth Ephes 4.9 Therefore to Hell Aunswere Into the lowest partes of the earth that is into the earth which is the lowest part of the world This interpretation is prooued by the scope and drift of the Apostle who maketh in that place an opposition of christs great glory his great humiliation But were it so that these places which some alleage for to establish this opinion were to be vnderstood of a locall descension of Christ into Hell yet would they not make for them but rather for the papists who teach That christ preached vnto the Fathers in Hell and thence deliuered them Now if these testimonies help not the Papists muchlesse wil they helpe them For it is certaine that it cannot be thence prooued that Christ descended into Hell to strike a terrour into Death and the Diuell This opinion indeed is not impious or vngodly is approoued by manie of the Fathers but yet I leaue it because it is not grounded on anie firme reasons and contrarie reasons are at hand easie to be had For 1. Christ himselfe said which testimonies haue now often beene recited This daie shalt thou bee with mee in Paradise Father into thy hands I commend my spirite Againe It is finished 2. Jf hee descended to triumph this Article should bee the beginning of his glorification But it is not likelie that Christ tooke the beginning of his glorification in hell For it is apparent by the opposition of the Article following That christes Descension was the lowest degree of his humiliation And yet I confesse withall that christ stroke a great terrour into the Diuels but that was by his death whereby hee disarmed and vanquished the Diuel sin and death THE THIRD DAY HE ROSE AGAINE FROM THE DEAD I Beleeue that Christ shooke off death from himselfe quickened his deade body reunited his bodie vnto his soule restored vnto himselfe a blessed celestial and glorious life and that by his owne proper power The chiefe Questions of christs resurrection are 1 Whether Christ rose againe 2 How he rose 3 For what cause he rose 4 The fruit of his resurrection 1 WHETHER CHRIST ROSE AGAINE THat Christ rose againe is prooued by the testimonies of Angels weomen Euangelistes Apostles and other Saintes who after his resurrection sawe him felt him and talked with him And wee were to beleeue the Apostles in respect of the authority which they had from heauen although they had not seene him 2 HOW CHRIST ROSE CHRIST rose first by his owne power euen by his Godheade Iohn 2.19 Destroie this temple and in three daies I will raise it vp againe Ioh. 10.18 I haue power to laie downe my soule and haue power to take it vp againe Ioh. 5.21 As the Father raiseth vp the dead and quickeneth them so the Sonne quickeneth whom he will Obiection But the Father raised him Rom. 4.24 Therefore hee raised not himselfe Aunswere The Father raised the Sonne by the Son himselfe not as by an instrument but as by another person of the same essence and power with the Father The Sonne is raised of the Father by himselfe Himselfe hath raised vp himselfe by his spirite Secondlie Iesus Christ true God and man rose according to that nature according to which he suffered namelie according to his humane nature euen the true humane nature and the same in essence and properties and that not deified but glorified al infirmities thereof beeing done away Luk. 24.39 Behold my handes and my feete for it is I my selfe handle me and see me for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see mee haue And truely nothing else coulde rise againe but that which had fallen The same bodie therefore which fell did rise againe which is the greatest comfort vnto vs. For hee must haue been one and the same Mediatour who should merit for vs a communicating and participation of those benefits which we had lost by sin who should restore the same vnto vs and applie them to euerie one Againe except Christes fleshe hadde risen neither shoulde ours rise
resurrection of our Mediatour was requisite for our iustification first because except his punishment had beene finite wee coulde not haue recouered out of euerlasting death from which the Mediatour was so to deliuer vs as that hee shoulde vtterly ouercome it in vs. If then our Mediatour was vtterlie to vanquish and ouercome death in vs hee ought then so to die as to ouercome death first in himselfe and so to fulfill indeede that which was foretolde Ose 13.14 1. Cor. 15.54 Death is swallowed vp into victorie O Death where is thy sting O graue where is thy victorie Againe Except Christ had ouercome death he could not haue bestowed his benefites on vs which by his death hee had merited for vs neither should we knowe that hee had satisfied for vs because if hee had continued in death it had beene a certaine argument that he had not satisfied but was ouercome of death of the burdē of sin For where death is there is sinne or if he had satisfied yet had remained in death this had been contrarie to the iustice of God Wherefore Christ was to rise both that wee might knowe that hee had promerited benefites for vs and also that himselfe might applie the same vnto vs that is that by his merit and efficacy we might be perfectlie saued and iustified 2. Christ rose for our regeneration For iustification or remission of sinnes sufficeth not without the inchoation and beginning of a new life 3. For our saluation and glorification God wil by this meanes euerlastinglie quicken and glorifie vs that beeing inserted and engraffed into the masse of his Son that is his humane nature wee maie for euer bee carried of it and out of it drawe life For these causes it was necessarie that Christ shoulde rise againe that is that his soul which was laide downe from the body should be againe ioined with the same body For resurrection is nothing else than a coniunction or reuniting of the same body with the same soule 4 What are the fruites of Christes Resurrection ALL the causes of Christs Resurrection are not fruites of his Resurrection And after a diuerse maner are the causes and the fruites of his resurrection considered and moreouer the benefites of Christ bestowed by his resurrection are one way considered as causes of Christs resurrection and otherwise as fruites of the same For the Questions are diuerse Wherefore christ rose And What fruits Christs resurrection bringeth vnto vs. Furdermore the fruite of Christs resurrectiō of two sorts the one respecting christ the other vs. For first as the Apostle sayth Rom. 1.4 Hee is declared by the resurrection to bee the Sonne of God euen the onely begotten and beloued Sonne of God who is also God himselfe Againe Christs humane nature also was by his resurrection adorned with that glorie which becommeth the nature of the Son of God The fruit of Christs resurrection which respecteth vs is of many sorts But to speake in general all the benefites of christes death are the fruites which we receiue by his resurrection For Christes resurrection maketh that his death hath his effect Christ by his resurrection dooth applie vnto vs those benefites which he merited for vs by his death by this means the same are the benefits both of his death resurrection which are otherwise merited for vs thā they ar bestowed on vs. For it was not necessarie that the verie act of meriting deseruing should dure all the time both of the old and the new Church but onely the act of bestowing or applieng the same and therefore it was necessarie also that the Mediatour should be continually that hee might bestow those benefites on the Church which hee was once to merite for this can not bee doone without a Mediatour and therefore neither can the Church be for one moment without a Mediator In the old church Christ the Mediator did bestow on the Fathers the benefits of his death to come by the force and efficacy of his resurrection to come nowe he bestoweth them on vs by the efficacie of his resurrection alreadie past It remaineth now that wee in speciall reckon the chiefe fruites which the resurrection of Christ bringeth vnto vs. First then by the resurrection of Christ wee know him to be the Messias as in whom the prophecies were fulfilled Secondly We are confirmed and warranted by Christes resurrection 1. Of his merit That hee hath fullie and perfectlie satisfied for our sinnes For one onelie sinne not being satisfied for had withheld christ still in death He was cast into such a prison as that except he had paied the vtmost farthing he had not beene let goe But he was let goe and dimissed Therefore he paied the vtmost farthing 2. We are confirmed of the application of Christes benefites which could not haue been bestowed if he had not risen For as was said before it was necessarie that the selfesame Mediatour beeing man should rise againe Ioh 7.39 The holy Ghost was not yet giuen Iesus was not yet glorified Wherefore wel saith Saint Paul Rom. 4.25 That Christ is risen again for our righteousnes that is to confer and apply righteousnesse vnto vs. Thirdly A fruit of christes resurrection is the gift of the holie Ghost by whom christ regenerateth vs and giueth vs eternal life Before time the Godlie were also endued with the holie Ghost and regenerated but more sparingly than nowe in the newe Testament and yet both by the force and vertue of his resurrection For the holy Ghost by whose vertue and operation onely wee are regenerated cannot be giuen but by the resurrection and ascension of christ Fourthly We must also ascribe and attribute it vnto christes resurrection that hee preserueth vs by his perpetuall and applied righteousnesse that hee beginneth in vs eternal life and so dooth also ascertaine and assure vs of the consummation and accomplishment of eternall life whereof wee cannot bee certaine except wee haue the beginning thereof and the beginning we should not haue except we had the holy Ghost Fiftlie The resurrection of our bodies is the fruite of christes resurrection 1. Because christ is our Heade and wee his members Now it is expedient for the Heades glorifie that the members bee glorious Christ indeede shoulde bee by himselfe though hee had no members or if his members continued in death but hee should not be Head because he is not heade but in respect of his members Neither shoulde hee bee a king without a kingdome according to the nature of correlatiues whose verie beeing dependeth vppon necessarie relation which one hath to the other and according to the nature of correlatiues a glorious head doth require glorious members and such as are correspondent vnto it 2. Because if Christ be risen he hath also abolished sinne If he hath abolished sinne either hee hath abolished his own sin or ours but not his owne therefore ours If he hath abolished our sin he hath abolished death also For if the cause
be taken awaie the effect likewise is taken awaie The wages of sinne is death Further if he hath abolished death and that by a sufficient satisfaction for our sinnes which satisfaction hee hath shewed and declared by his resurrection to bee sufficient it is certaine that his resurrection is a most certaine testimonie of our resurrection for he hauing perfourmed a sufficient satisfaction for the sinnes of his members the members cannot remaine in death But the resurrection of Christ the Heade is an argument of the perfect satisfaction for the sinnes of his members Therefore Christes resurrection is also an argument of the perfect resurrection of his members 3. As the first Adam receiued blessinge◠for himselfe and all his posteritie and lost the same from all So Christ the second Adam receiued life and al other giftes for himselfe and others and therefore also will communicate eternall life with vs. 4. Seeing the same spirite dwelleth in vs which did in Christ hee shall woorke also the same in vs which in our Head he did For the spirit is alwaies like neither dooth he woorke in the Head and sleepe in the members Therefore seeing Christ hath raised himselfe vp by his spirite for the dead he wil verilie also raise vs vp For if hee raised himselfe vp beeing dead much more shal he bee able beeing aliue to raise vs vp 5. Because Christ is man for execept hee were man we shoulde haue no hope of the resurretion of our flesh For by man came resurrection 1. Cor. 15.21 Obiection 1. Then the wicked shall not rise againe because christes resurrection is neither an argument nor the cause of the resurrection of the wicked but of the godlie onelie Aunswere There be other causes for which the wicked shal rise again euē for the iust iudgement of God whereby he hath appointed them to eternall paines For the same thing maie haue moe effectes and diuerse causes Obiection 2 These are the benefites of his death therefore not of his resurrection Aunswere They are of his death as by it he deserued them of his resurrection in respect of the application of his benefites Hee beeing rich was made poore and beeing poore was made rich againe that he might enrich vs. Obiection 3. The effect is not before the cause The cause of these benefites which is his resurrection was not before the first resurrection therefore neither the effect that is the benefites themselues Aunswere The resurrection was not as touching the accomplishment thereof but in the counsell of God and in efficacie and vertue it was in the olde Testament For then also were men receiued into fauour they were endued with the holie Ghost and receiued the other benefits but for and by the Mediator which was in time appointed to be humbled and glorified The last though not the least fruite of christes resurrection is The consummation and perfecting of all his benefites and the glorifieng of his church For christ did therefore die and is therefore risen and hath therefore perfectlie deliuered vs from sinne that wee may bee ioint-heires with him of his kingdome Coloss 1.18 Hee is the first borne of the dead Rom. 8.17 Wee are the heires of God and heires annexed with Christ He shal conforme vs and make vs like vnto himselfe because we liue by the same spirit whereby he dooth And this spirite is not vnlike himselfe Rom. 8.11 Jf the spirite of him that raised vp Iesus from the dead dwell in you he that raised vp Christ from the deade shall also quicken your mortall bodies because that his spirit dwelleth in you Ioh. 14.3 I wil come againe and receiue you vnto my selfe that where I am there maie yee bee also Now in this we obserue That the whole humiliation of the Mediatour doth not dure for euer For it was enough that hee suffered once but the efficacie and power thereof in preseruing and maintaining the blessings thereby comming endureth for euer Christ therefore rose that is by his owne proper vertue and power brought againe and returned his soule vnto his bodie that both soule and bodie might bee deliuered from al ignominie and infirmitie and be adorned with immortalitie and perfect glorie That is 1. Hee recalled his soule vnto his bodie 2. But both yet beeing now glorified and freed from infirmities 3. By his owne proper power he receiued his soule I beleeue then that Christ is raised from the dead that is that he therefore rose againe from the dead that hee might make vs partakers of his righteousnesse sanctification glorification which hee purchased for vs by his merite Seeing therefore Christ is risen it is manifest that hee is declared to bee the Sonne of God and as touching his humanitie is endowed with that glory which becommeth the nature of the Sonne of God and further that he endueth vs also with his spirite regenerateth vs by the vertue of his spirite and wil at length consummate and perfect the new life begun in vs and make vs compartners of the same his glory felicity and euerlasting life HE ASCENDED INTO HEAVEN CHRISTS Ascension into heauen is a locall true and visible translation and remoouing of Christs bodie into that heauen which is about all visible heauens to that light which is not to be come vnto to the right hand of God where he now is and remaineth and whence he shall returne to iudgement The chiefe Questions of Christs Ascension into heauen 1 Whither or to what place christ ascended 2 How he ascended 3 Wherefore he ascended 4 What is the difference betweene christs Ascension ours 5 What are the fruites of christs Ascension 1 WHITHER CHRIST ASCENDED IESVS Christ man when he was together with his Disciples in Bethania fourty daies after his resurrection after he had often prooued and confirmed his resurrection his true fleshe and humanity vnto his Apostles ascended in their sight into heauen Heauen in Scripture signifieth 1 The aire 2 The Skieye region and celestiall Spheres 3 The place of the blessed which is that space immense most lightsome glorious without and aboue the whole world and the visible heauen where God sheweth himselfe to the blessed Angels and men where is prepared the seat of our blisse with Christ and the Angels God is said to dwel there because there dooth his glorie especially appeare vnto the blessed Angels men It is called the new world paradise the bosome of Abraham This heauen is not euerie where Luk. 16.26 Betweene you and vs there is a great gulfe set so that they which would go from hence to you can not neither can they come from thence to vs. In this third signification is heauen here taken Christ then ascended into Heauen that is was caried vp into the place of the blessed Act. 2.2 The Holie Ghost came from Heauen in the day of Pentecost 2. King 2.11 Elias was taken vp into Heauen 2. Cor. 12.2 Paul maketh mention of the third Heauen Coloss 3.1 Seeke those thinges which are aboue
and shall bee adiudged to eternall paines Not as if the wicked were not alreadie condemned For as we said the Diuels were alreadie iudged so also are the wicked alreadie iudged and condemned namely 1. Jn the decree of God 2 Jâ— his word 3. In their owne consciences 4. As concerning the beginning of their iudgement But then the wicked together 〈◊〉 the Diuels shall bee iudged by proclaiming and publiâ—hiâ—g of that iudgement For then shal be 1 a manifestation of Goâ—s iudgement that they perish iustlie who perish 2. The wicked shall further suffer also punishment and tormentes of bodie which now is buried 3. The wicked and the Diuels shal be so sharply lookt vnto and kept vnder that they shall not bee able any more to hurt the godly or to despite God and his church A great gulfe placed betweene vs and them shall shut vp all passage from them so that they shall cease to harme vs. 8 For what causes that iudgement shal be THE chiefe and principall cause is the decree of God For therefore shal the last iudgement be because god hath said decreed that it shal be Wherefore it must needs be so that so God maie haue his end that is that he may shew and declare perfectlie and wholy his goodnesse and loue towardes vs that hee maie bee worshipped in his Temple which is in his chosen that the Sonne of God maie haue his kingdome and his citizens glorious and such as beseeme him 2. A lesse principal and subordinate cause is both the saluation of the Elect who are here vexed and the damnation of the wicked who here doe florish For therefore also shal the last iudgement bee that it maie goe well with the good and ill with the bad And of this shall the Godly take matter to magnifie and praise God 3. The last iudgement shal be because of Gods iustice Heere is not a full and perfect execution of Gods iustice For the wicked must bee in perfect and full ill state both in bodie and soule 9 When this iudgement shal be THIS iudgement shal be in the end of the world in the end of daies For there are three parts of the during and continuance of the world 1 Before the Law 2 Vnder the Law 3 Vnder Christ That part of the during of the world which is vnder christ is called the ende of the worlde the end of daies the last time Wherefore there shal not be so long space between christs first comming and his second as was from the beginning of the world vnto his first comming But the yeare the day the moneth of this iudgement is not knowen of Christ himselfe 1 As touching his humane nature 2 As touching his office and Mediatorship Mar. 13.32 Of that day and houre knoweth no maÌ„ no not the Angels which are in heauen neither the Son himselfe saue the Father 10 Wherefore God would haue vs certaine of the last iudgement THE time of the iudgement to come is vnknowen to vs but as it is most certaine that that iudgement shal come so God also would haue vs knowe the same First in respect of his glorie That wee might bee able to refute Epicures who account this heauenly doctrine of the diuine iudgement to come for a fable Jt should goe well saie they with the righteous But it dooth not so Therefore God either can not performe it or standeth not to his promises or there is no prouidence Vnto which their cauill we aunswere That because in this life it goeth not well with the Godly it shall go well with them at length after this life Secondly God will haue vs knowe it for our comfort That we may comfort our selues amidst our euils miseries with this that at length shall come a time when we shal be deliuered from this corruption and rottennesse Thirdly that we maie retaine keepe our selues in the feare of God and our dutie and that others also may be reclaimed from euill This iudgement shal be let vs endeuour therefore that wee may be able to stand in this iudgement The scripture vseth this argument both waies both to comfort vs and to hold and keepe vs in our duty Christ shall at length iudge the wicked and our enimies suffer we therefore patiently persecutions Rom. 14.10 Wee shal al appear before the iudgement seat of Christ therefore liue wee Godly Fourthly That the wicked may be left excuselesse For they are warned sufficiently that they shoulde bee ready at euerie season least they should say they were oppressed vnawares 11 For what cause God would not haue vs certaine of the time of iudgement ALbeit it be most certaine that the last iudgement shal at length be yet the day of that iudgement is altogether vncertaine Mar. 13.32 Of that day and houre no man knoweth no not the Angels which are in heauen nor the Sonne himselfe saue the Father Wherefore the yeare moneth day houre of the last iudgement Christ himselfe also knoweth not not onely as concerning his humane nature but also in respect of his present office The present office of Christ to wit in that he is our Mediatour doth not require that he should declare that vnto vs. Now the causes why God would haue it hid from vs are these 1 That he might exercise our faith and patience and so we should shew that we would beleeue God albeit wee knowe not the time of our deliuerie 2 That he might bridle our curiositie 3 That he might keepe vs in his feare in godlinesse and in executing of our dutie and so we should bee readie euery moment Mat. 24.43 Jf the good-man of the house knew Luk. 12.40 Occupie til I come 12 For what cause God differreth that iudgement HEE differreth it 1 To exercise faith patience hope and praier in the Godlie 2 That all the elect may bee gathered vnto the Church For in respect of them and not in respect of the wicked doth the world continue For the creatures were made for the children of the house The wicked vse them as theeues and robbers Nowe God will haue the elect gathered by ordinary meanes he will haue them in this life to heare the word and by it to be renewed conuerted vnto which is required some tract of time 3 He differeth it that hee might grant vnto all a time and space of repentaunce as at this time and that his differring might leaue the wicked obstinate without excuse Rom. 2.4 Despisest thou the riches of his bountifulnesse and patience and long sufferance not knowing that the bountifulnesse of God leadeth thee to repentance 13 Whether the last iudgement bee to be wished for WE are doubtlesse to wish for the day of iudgement because it is an vndoubted signe and token of that difference whereby the Elect are discerned from the reprobate which declaration the Godly doe earnestly desire Moreouer it shall bee a deliuerie out of those miseries in which we are Rom. 7.24 O wretched man that I am who
remission of sinnes is giuen REmission of sins is giuen by faith Remission of sinnes giuen by faith through the working of the Holy Ghost by which being wrought and kindled in vs by the holy Ghost wee receiue the same Therefore the purpose and decree of God of remitting sinnes is euerlasting but the executing and performance thereof is when by faith we applie remission of sins vnto vs. So also God doth alwaies loue his elect but that loue is not poured out in their hearts before their repentance For they haue that certain testimonie of conscieÌ„ce by the gift of the holy Ghost that they are loued of god so haue their sins remitted who truly conuert and repent Oâ— THE RESVRRECTION OF THE FLESH THE chiefe quâ—stions 1 What the Resurrection is 2 The Errours concerning the Resurrection 3 Whence it may appeare that the Resurrection shall certainelie be 4 For what end the Resurrection shal be 5 By whom 6 How 7 When. 8 What bodies shall rise 9 Whether the soule be immortall 1 WHAT THE RESVRRECTION IS THE Word Resurrection signifieth sometime preseruation The resurrection of the flesh is a restoring of the substance of our bodies after death euen of the same matter whereof they now consist and a reuiuing and quickening of the same bodies with life immortall and incorruptible by the same immortall soule whereby they now liue which God will woorke by Christ in the ende of the woorlde by his diuine vertue and power which restoring also shal be of the elect vnto the eternall glorie of God but of the reprobate vnto eternall paines That is 1. There shal be a restoring of the same bodie which is a recollecting gathering together of the same matter which was scattered and seuered into al the Elementes 2. An vniting of it with the same soule and a reuiuing of it 〈◊〉 the same soule which also it had before 3. A putting off of al infirmities a putting on of immortality 2 The Errours concerning the Resurrection THE Errours helde of the resurrection are of three sortes Some haue vtterlie denied it and haue auouched the souls to die together with the bodies 2. Some haue granted the immortalitie of the soule but haue constred the resurrection to bee a resurrection in this life but the bodies they denied to rise at all although the soules of the godlie haue fruition after death of euerlasting happinesse 3. Some as Anabaptistes deny that the verie selfe same bodies which we now haue shal rise again but they saie that Christ at his second comming will make new bodies 3 Whence it maie appeare that the Resurrection shall certainlie beâ— IT maie be verily collected probably out of philosophie that there shal be sometime a resurrection Probable proofes of the Resurrection yeelded by philosophie but no necessarie demonstrance but no necessarie demonstration can bee yeelded thence that the Resurrection shall certainly bee For in philosophy are manie principles which accord not with the sacred writinges of Gods spirite Againe in philosophy the knowleege which it hath of Gods iustice and trueth is but a maimed reason But in the holie writ of God the reasons are firme true Hence alone therefore is demonstration giuen for the most certaine accomplishment of the Resurrection And this first by testimonies of scripture then by reasons drawn out of scripture The testimonies of Scripture The Testimonies of scripture for demoÌ„strance of the Resurrection which confirme the certaintie of the resurrection hereafter to come are most euident and those taken both out of the olde and new Testament Iob 19.25 I am sure that my redeemer liueth and hee shall stand the last on the earth and though after my skin worms destroy this bodie yet shal I see God in my flesh Iohn 5.28 The hour shal come in the which all that are in the graues shall heare his voice And they shal come forth that haue doone good vnto the resurrection of life but they that haue doone euil vnto the resurrection of condemnation Iohn 6 40. I wil raise him vp at the last day 1. Corint 15.13 If there bee no resurrection of the deade then is Christ not risen And if Christ be not risen then is our preaching vaine and your faith is also vaine Reasons drawen out of the scripture for proofe thereof The reasons which are drawen also out of Scripture are diuerse 1. God promiseth eternall life not to the soule onelie but also to the bodie of the godly and contrarie to the vngodly hee threatneth eternall punishment and paines both of bodie and soule and these promises and threatninges of God must bee fulfilled For the certainty of them is vnchaungeable But they shal not bee fulfilled if the deade shal not rise Seeing therefore God dooth most certainelie in his good time accomplish that which hee promiseth to the godly and menaceth to the wicked it followeth of necessitie that the dead must rise againe 2. The mercie of God is perfect as which extendeth it selfe to the whole man and which will haue vs wholy saued Therefore our bodies also shal rise again 3. The mercie and loue of God towardes the godly is perpetuall and vnchaungeable so that what hee once will of his fatherly loue towardes them perfourme vnto them the same he euer will But he wil haue the godly saued both in soule and bodie therefore they must be both in soule and bodie euen whole saued and therefore that they maie bee whole saued they must needes rise againe 4. The perfect iustice of God requireth that the same wholie whereby they sinne should be punished with eternall paines But they sinne both in their whole bodie and in their soule Therefore their bodies also must be raised againe because they ought no lesse in body than in soule to suffer eternal pains 5. Christ is risen therefore wee also shall rise This sequele is most sure For first Christ therefore rose againe that hee might raise vs. Secondly Christ is our head and we his members Seeing then Christ our head is risen we also his members doubtles shal rise For the glorie of the head requireth this that he haue his members sutable in like condition with him Wherefore if the members should continue rotten the head should not be glorious Thirdly The same spirite is in vs which is in Christ raised he ioineth and vniteth vs with Christ and worketh the same in vs which he doth in Christ neither is at anie time not like himselfe But he hath raised Christ Therefore also hee will raise vs. 6. It is saide that Christ shall haue an euerlasting kingdome but this he should not haue if our bodies should alwaies continue in death for neither would it suffice that our soules are immortall or eternal without our bodies For that Christs kingdome may be eternall he must haue eternall subiects and those wholy eternall Therefore our bodies also shall rise that so wee whole may bee subiect eternally vnto Christ our king
7. Christ is a perfect Sauiour because he hath saued and reconciled to god whole man Therefore our corrupt bodie also shall be raised by Christ and rise againe 8. Christ is not of lesse force to saue than Adam to leese Nay Christ hath restored vnto vs al that which Adam lost destroied by sinning yea and far more and greater things by his merit Adam had lost from vs among other gifts the eternall life also of our bodies Therefore Christ hath restored it vnto vs and consequently we shall certainely rise againe 9. God is the God of whole man This reason Christ also vseth against the Sadduces Mat. 22.31 Haue yee not read what is spoken vnto you of God saying I am the God of Abraham and the God of Jsaac and the god of Jacob God is not the god of the dead but of the liuing And so God is the God of whole man not of a part onely For if he were God of a part that is of the soule onely he were not perfectly and fullie our God 10. He published his lawe vnto man after the fall Therefore hee will haue man once keepe it But that is not done in this life Therefore it shall be done in the life to come and therefore men shall rise againe 11. The wages of sinne is death Therefore sinne being abolished death shal be abolished and so death being abolished we shall rise againe vnto euerlasting life To this end also our bodies were made that in them as temples the holy Ghost might dwell for euer 4 For what end the Resurrection shall be THE last end of the Resurrection is gods glorie The endes of the resurrection 1 Gods glorie For to this end shall the Resurrection be that God may manifest and together fullie and perfectly exercise both his mercy towards the faithful and his iustice toward the reprobate and so may declare the vnutterable certainty of his promises The next and subordinate end to the former is the saluation and the glorie of the Elect and of the contrarie 2 The saluation and glorie of the elect and the damnation of the reprobate the damnation and punishment of the reprobate For the Elect or Saints of god shall rise to euerlasting life Reuel 3.21 To him will J graunt to sit with me in my throne Reuel 7.13 They shall be araied in long white robes Dan. 12.3 They shall shine as the Sunne But the wicked shall rise to be drawen to euerlasting paines and torments Mat. 25.41 Depart from me yee cursed into euerlasting fire which is prepared for the Diuel and his Angels and a little after And these shall goe into euerlasting paine and the righteous into life eternall Obiection Christs Resurrection is the cause of our Resurrection and also the benefite of Christs Resurrection is our Resurrection But this cause and this benefite belongeth not to vnbeleeuers and Jnfidels Therefore they shall not rise Aunswere This whole reason is graunted namely that the wicked shall not rise because of Christs Resurrection but hence it foloweth not that they shall not rise because they shal rise in respect of another cause which is that they may be punished There is but one end indeede of our Resurrection in respect of God which is his glorie but the manner of comming to this end is diuers 5 By whom the Resurrection shall be The Resurrectiō by Christ THE Resurrection shall be by Christ for by the force and vertue of Christ our Sauiour we shall rise Joh. 6.44 J will raise him vp in the last day Which speech of Christ is to bee vnderstood of the bodie For hee doth not raise vp the souls because they die not Now Christ man shall raise vs though by the vertue of his Godhead Joh. 5.28 The houre shall come in the which all that are in the graues shall heare the voice of the Sonne of man Act. 17.31 God hath appointed a day in the which he will iudge the world in righteousnes by that man whom he hath appointed whereof he hath giuen assurance vnto all men in that he hath raised him from the dead And hence ariseth vnto vs great consolation and comfort Because he is true man who shall raise vs he will not neglect his owne flesh and members but wil raise them euen vs will he raise to eternal life for which cause he tooke our flesh and redeemed vs. Obiection But the father is saide to raise vs yea to raise Christ himselfe Rom. 8.11 Hee that raised vp Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies because that his spirite dwelleth in you Therefore wee shall not bee raised by Christ nor by the power of Christ Answere The Father shall raise vs by his Sonne mediately But the Sonne shall immediately raise vs with his spirit as being our only Redeemer Phil. 3.20 We looke for our Sauiour from heauen euen the Lord Jesus Christ who shall change our vile bodie that it may be fashioned like vnto his glorious bodie according to the working whereby he is able euen to subdue all thinges vnto himselfe But the spirite shall immediately raise vs by himselfe 6 How the Resurrection shall be At the resurrection 1. The dead shall bee raised 1 THE dead shall bee raised with a shoute and with the voice of the Archangell with the trumpet of god and shal be presented before the high and most iust iudge Iesus Christ The resurrection therefore shall bee in glorious manner and openlie not fearefullie nor in secret and shall bee far other than that which was wrought in some men at the resurrection of Christ For it shall bee done all beholding it yea with the exceeding ioy of al the godly with the exceeding feare and trembling of the wicked 2. They who then shall remaine aliue 2 The liuing shall bee changed shall bee in a moment of time changed and bee made of mortall immortall Read Cap. 15 of the former to the Corinthians and Cap. 4. of the former to the Thessalonians 7 When the Resurrection shall be THE Resurrection shall be in the end of the world In the last day Joh. 6.40 J will raise him vp at the last day This question is to bee helde and proposed of vs that our faith bee not troubled while wee are forced to expect and tarry or that we may not imagine to our selues any certain time when we thinke these things wil happen and so beginne to doubt and thinke our selues to be deluded when those thinges fall not so out nor come to passe at the time appointed by vs. This question maketh for the increase of hope and faith in vs. 8 What bodies shall rise THese selfe same bodies shall rise The same bodies shall rise Iob. 19 26. Eph. 6.8 2. Cor. 5.10 and not others created of christ as the Anabaptists will haue it For Iob saith Jn this flesh shall J see my Lord. And the Apostle saith Euery man shall receiue in his bodie according to
that hee hath done If then the bodies which haue sinned shall receiue accordingly not other bodies but the same shall rise And the very word it selfe of rising enforceth as much for nothing can rise but that which is fallen Wherefore seeing our bodies shall rise no other bodies shall rise or bee quickened than those which haue fallen and are dead or no other than those which doe fall and die How flesh and bloud i◠denied the heauenly inheritance Obiection But saint Paul saith that flesh and bloud cannot inherite the kingdome of god Therefore our bodies cannot possesse the kingdome of god because they are flesh and bloud Answere The flesh oftentimes signifieth some qualitie or the substaunce in respect of some certaine qualitie So flesh that is being sinfull and corruptible shall not possesse the kingdome of God but our flesh then shall no more be able to sinne neither shall it bee corruptible Obiection 2. Our bodies shall be spirituall 1. Cor. 15.44 Jt is sowen a naturall bodie and is raised a spirituall bodie Therefore our bodies shall not then haue the properties of our flesh Aunswere In what sense our bodies shall bee spirituall They shall bee indeede spirituall but shall not haue all the properties of a spirite but some onely because they shall bee agile and quicke mightie and vncorrupt and indeede are therefore chieflie called spirituall because they shall be guided by the spirite neither shall any more the naturall life remaine in them That this is true is apparent by these reasons 1. The Apostle himselfe addeth This corruptible must put on incorruption 2. Hee calleth it a spirituall bodie but a spirite is no bodie 3. Jf anie bodie after the resurrection should be so spirituall as not retaining at all anie bodilie properties then surelie Christs bodie should haue beene so but now he saith to the Apostles Luk. 24.39 Handle me and see for a spirite hath not flesh and bones as ye see mee haue Obiection 3. How are wee saide to beleeue the resurrection when as yet wee are saide to hope for the resurrection to come Answere We are saide to hope for the resurrection as it is an effect of Gods counsell wee are saide to beleeue it as it is the counsell it selfe and purpose of God 9 Whether the soule be immortal The causes for which this Question is to bee moued Mat. 22.23 2. Tim. 2.17 BEsides that this question belongeth to the Article of the Resurrection the explication also thereof in it selfe shal not be altogether vnprofitable or fruitlesse For not now onely doe they beginne to dispute against the immortalitie of the soule but the Sadduces also denied it as they likewise that said the Resurrection was past alreadie vnto him that beleeued neither made anie other resurrection besides that spirituall resurrection of the regenerate Likewise also some Anabaptists denie the immortalitie of the soule Moreouer Paul the third Pope of Rome when he was breathing out his soule and readie to dy said that now at length he should trie know three things whereof in his whole time he had much doubted 1. Whether there were a god 2. Whether soules were immortall 3. Whether there were any hel Wherefore it ought not to seeme straunge if this question be moued neither shal it bee altogether vaine and needelesse both because it serueth for the controuling and refuting especially of Epicures and also because it maketh for the better vnderstanding of some places of holy Scripture But because there haue beene and euen nowe are who haue taught that the soule of man like as of bruite beastes is nothing else but life or the vitall power arising of the temperature and perfection of the bodie and therefore dieth and is extinguished together with the bodie and as some of them speake who wil seeme to beleeue the resurrection of the dead doth sleepe when the bodie dieth that is is without motion or sense vntil the raising of the bodie which indeede is nothing else than that the soule is mortal that is a meere qualitie onlie in the bodie and when the bodie is dissolued becommeth nothing because if it were an incorporeal substance it could not be without sense and motion against these we are to holde the recordes of Gods woorde and writ concerning the spiritual and immortal substaunce of mans soul The soule an in corporeall substance That the soule of man is not onely a forme or perfection or temperament or force and power or an agitation arising out of the temperature of the bodie but a substaunce incorporeall liuing vnderstanding dwelling in the bodie and susteining and moouing it these places following of holy Scripture doe shewe Psalm 48. His soule shal be blessed in life Heb. 12. God is called the Father of spirites And it is saide of the faithfull Yee are come to the celestial Ierusalem and to the companie of innumerable Angels and to the spirites of iust and perfect men 1 Cor. 2.11 No man knoweth the thinges of a man saue the spirite of a man which is in him In these and the like places of Scripture both the soule of man is called a spirite and the properties of a liuing vnderstanding substance are attributed vnto it Wherefore to no purpose doe the aduersaries of this doctrine oppose those places in which the name of the soul is taken for the the life and wil of man as Matth. cap. 6. The soul is more woorth than meate Iob. 13.14 J put my soule in my hand For by the fore-alledged places it is manifest thnt this is not general but is vsed by a * Metalepsis figure of speech whereby we cal the effect by the name of his cause Now the immortalitie of the soule is prooued by manifest places of holie Scripture 1. Luk 23.43 The soule immortall Christ hanging on the crosse said to the theefe this daie shalt thou be with me in Paradise But he could not be there in bodie because that was dead and buried Therefore his soule was gathered with Christs into Paradise and so consequentlie the soul liueth 2. Paul saith Phil. 1.23 I desire to be loosed and to be with christ he speaketh of the rest ioie which he should enioie with christ But they who feele nothing what can their ioie or happinesse bee Wherefore they also are refuted in this place who saie mens souls sleep so withall denie the immortality of the soul 3. Wised 3.1 The souls of the iust are said to be in the hands of god 4. Matt. 22.32 God is not the god of the dead but of the liuing Therefore the soules liue 5. Luk. 23.46 Into thy hands I commend my spirit 6. 2 Corinth 5.8 When we remoue out of the body we may goe vnto the Lord. Wherefore the soules sleep not as some Anabaptistes wil haue thē but enioie immortall life and celestiall glorie with the Lorde 7. In the Reuelation cap. 6.10 The soules of the godly that were killed are said to
crie with a loude voice vnder the aultar saying How long Lord holy and true doost not thou iudge and auenge our bloode on them that dwell on the earth Wherefore the soules liue 8. Luk. 16.22 Lazarus is said to bee carried into Abrahams bosome and out of the same place also it is apparent concerning the souls of the wicked For the rich glutton is also saide of the contrarie to bee caried downe to hell These testimonies therefore of Scripture teach and confirme most euidently that not onely in the bodie before death and after the resurrection of the bodie but also in the whole space and time comming betweene the soules are liue feele vnderstand out of the bodie though the manner of their operations bee to vs vnknowen Wherefore also this gift of immortalitie hath some similitude with God who alone as the onely fountaine and author of life hath immortalitie 1. Timot. 6. Man should haue liued immortallie if hee had not sinned But furdermore that man should haue lead a blessed life immortallie and for euer not in soule onely but also in bodie if hee had not purchased death and mortalitie vnto himselfe by sinne is first hereby proued because by sin death entered into the worlde as the wages of sinne Rom. 5. 6. Next because wee being freeed from sinne by christ are also freed from death And lastly because God him-selfe did withdraw from man being made by sinne subiect vnto death the signe or sacrament of immortalitie which was the fruite of the tree of life Gen. 3. Wherefore their obiections are nought worth who imagine the soules after death to sleepe or vanish away For Gen. 1. and 1. Cor. 15. Adam is saide to haue beene made a liuing soule not simplie as these will haue it like as other liuing creatures are termed in the same place liuing soules but as being made to the image and similitude of God which hee hath not in common with other creatures Gen. 2. When God saieth Jn the day that thou eatest of the tree of knowledge of good and euill thou shalt die the death hee doth not threaten vnto man the destruction or extinguishing of his soule but eternal death that is Sundrie places of scripture alleaged against the immortality of the soule interpreted according to their right sense and meaning the horrible feeling and terrour of Gods wrath and iudgement and to liue forsaken and cast from God subiect to all miseries and tormentes an adioint of which death is the separation of the soule and body which at that time through the mercy of God that mankind might be saued was differred For so was Adam dead while yet hee liued in Paradise according to Gods denouncement euen assoone as he had eaten of the forbidden fruite So in eternal death liue all the damned and reprobate Whose fire shall not bee put out and their worme not dy So Ephes 2. they are said to be dead through sinne who liue in sinne without repentaunce And Ephes 5. Hee is willed to rise from the dead who is reclaimed from sinne to God And Rom. 7 5. Paul saith that he was dead through the knowledge of his sinne and the wrath of God Iob. 11. Act. 7. 1. Cor. 11. 1. Thess 4. The deade are saide to sleepe but this is by a * Synecdochâ— figure of speech translating that which is proper vnto the bodie to the whole man For that this belongeth to the bodie which is to bee recalled from death to life as it were from sleepe to wake againe manie places declare as Iob 7. Beholde now I sleepe in the dust For not the soule but the bodie onely sleepeth in the dust and graue The Preacher saith The condition of the children of men Eccle. 3 1â— and the condition of beastes are euen as one condition vnto them Therefore there is no immortality of the soul Ans It is a fallacie concluding that which is in some respect so to bee simplie so 1. Men die as beastes in that men must needes once die and depart out of this life because men are not here to continue for euer nor haue heere a setled place 2. Men die as beastes that is in the sense and iudgement of the wicked Blessednesse and the kingdome promised to the Godly is saide then first to fall vnto them at the last daie Mat. 24.25 Mar. 13. Dan. 12. But these places shewe not that the soules of the godly doe not presentlie when they depart from their bodies enioie celestial blessednesse and ioy but that at the last daie when their bodies are raised againe their felicitie and glorie shall bee consummated and made absolute For so we praie thy kingdome come when yet God now also raigneth in vs. Of that which is saide 1. Corint 15. If in this life onelie wee haue hope we are of all men most miserable they thus reason He that is blessed and happie before the resurrection is not without the resurrection most miserable But we without the resurrection should be of al men most miserable Therefore we are not before the resurrection blessed and happie But the Maior wee aunswere Hee is not miserable without the resurrection who cannot onely before it but without it also bee blessed But wee are in such wise blessed before it that notwithstanding without it following and ensuing wee cannot enioie that former blessednesse because God hath ioyned with so vnseparable a knot the beginning and proceeding and finishing or perfection of the Electes blessednesse that none can haue the beginning who must not come to the ende consummation thereof Wherefore either we must rise again or wee must want also that celestiall blessednesse before the resurrection Rom. 8.11 Jf the spirit of him that raised vp Jesus from the dead dwell in you he that raised vp Christ from the dead shal also quicken your mortal bodies Heb. 11.39 These all through faith are deade and receiued not the promise Therefore they receiued not their countrie We aunswere first Although they dying had not found their countrie yet would it not follow of these woordes that they are not at al or haue no sense after death For he that is not or hath no sense seeketh not his countrie Secondly The author of that Epistle doth not speak of the life after death which is lead in the celestial countrie 2. Cor. 5. but of this life in which the faithful walking their pilgrimage sought for the celestiall countrie not finding their countrie on earth Psalm 78.39 They are flesh a winde that passeth awaie and commeth not againe By these and the like speeches the breuitie of mans life and the frailtie and perishing of all humane affaires without God is described and bewailed For as here they are compared to a wind eftsoones vanishing awaie so Psalm 103. they are compared to dust grasse and flowers of the field Likewise Job 14. Hee shooteth forth as a flower and is cut downe and vanisheth as a shadowe Isaie 40.6 All flesh
is grasse But if they vrge the verie woorde in these speeches it will followe that not onely after death there is nothing remaining but that there is not any resurrection when hee saith a wind that passeth and commeth not againe as also flowers and shadowes whereunto man is compared doe so perish that they are not recouered Psalm 88.5 I am counted as the slain lying in the graue whom thou remembrest no more In these wordes the Prophet doth not signifie either himselfe or the dead to bee exempted from Gods prouidence but he complaineth that he is forsaken of God euen as the deade seeme to men not to bee cared for of him and therefore he speaketh not according to the sense of faith but of his owne opinion and weaknes miserie who iudgeth those to be forsaken and neglected of God whose deliuerie for a while he dooth differre But what faith in the meane season suggesteth and telleth the godly euen when they wrestle with temptation he sheweth Psalm 11.2 when hee saith The iust shall bee in euerlasting memorie Psal 146.4 His spirit departeth and he returneth to his earth thē his thoughts perish Here he saith not the spirit or soul of men perisheth or vanisheth or dieth or is bereaued of sense but that it departeth to wit from the bodie wherein it dwelleth and that not the spirit but the man returneth to his earth that is as concerning his bodie which was made of earth as is written Gen. 3 and Eccles 12. And lastly he saith that his thoughtes perish which is not that the soule is after this life bereaued of reason iudgement and sense of the mercy or wrath of God but that his purposes and counsels are made frustrate which man in this life had setled with him-selfe to bring to passe in which sense it is said Psalm 112.10 The desire of the wicked shal perish They gather also other sayings which take away all praising and worshipping of God from the dead As Psal 88.10 Wilt thou shew a miracle vnto the dead Or shall the dead rise and praise thee But in such speeches death and hell or the graue haue two significations They who are spiritually dead whether before or after the death of the bodie that is they who are depriued of gods grace forsaken and reiected of god and are in hell that is in the place torments of the damned or else in this life despairing and destitute of comfort shall not praise god at all neither in this life nor in the life to come But they who are dead not spiritually but corporally onely albeit they shall not praise god in this life while their bodies are in hell that is in the graue yet in soul they shal not cease to acknowledge and praise god in the other life vntill when receiuing their bodies againe they shall magnifie him in both in the celestial eternity But in the meane season because god will also be agnised and magnified of men in this life therefore both the whole Church and euerie one of the faithfull not only pray that they may not fall into that forsaking into that sense of gods wrath wherewith the wicked are oppressed but also desire that they may bee in this mortall life preserued and defended vntill the end thereof by god appointed be expired For the Saints doe not simply stand in feare of the bodily death and graue but that they may not be forsaken of god neither fall into desperation and destruction or their enimies insult against god when they are ouerthrowen this with daily and ardent praiers and petitions they beg and craue continually Nowe that which the aduersaries ad farther out of the Psal 146.2 I will praise the Lord during my life as long as J haue anie beeing I will sing vnto my God this maketh nothing with thē For he restraineth not the praising of God to the time of his mortal life but only he saith that he wil spēd all that time in Gods praises which notwithstanding in manie other places he extendeth to continue al eternity as Psal 34. I wil praise the Lord continually But oftentimes this particle vntill or as long as signifieth a continuance of the time going before some euent without any excluding of the time following as 1. Cor. 15.25 He must raign vntil he hath put al his enemies vnder his feete Iob. 10.20 Let him cease and leaue off from mee that I maie take a little comfort before I goe and shal not returne Hee denieth in these wordes that he shall returne into this mortall life and to conuerse among men in this woorlde but hee denieth not that hee in the meane season hath his beeing and doth liue vntil againe he see God in his flesh euen the same Iob who thē was afflicted As himself saith ca. 19.26 Iob 3.11 Why died I not when I came out of the womb Here also Iob dooth not denie the soules after death to bee liue feele and vnderstand but only he saith the miseries of this present life are not felt If they vrge that neither the euils of the life to come are felt because then Job shoulde wish for a bad chaunge we aunswere that Iob wisheth not for the death of the wicked but of the godly But if they ad furder That Job dooth make Kings and Princes also which gather gold vnto them smal and great that is al men good and bad partakers of this rest our aunswere is out of the processe and course of his whole speech that Iob dooth not teach here what is the state of men after this life but onely desireth to bee rid of his present miserie and therefore through humane infirmity and impatiency doth compare the sense and feeling of his present miseries with the death and state of the dead whatsoeuer it be as they who are grieuously tormented with present distresses and calamities prefer any thing whatsoeuer before that which they suffer So also chapter 7. hee speaketh as one despairing of deliuerie in this life Remember that my life is but a wind and that mine eie shal not returne to see pleasure For so hee expoundeth himselfe when he addeth He shal returne no more to his house neither shall his place knowe him anie more So likewise cap. 17. My breath is corrupt and the graue is readie for me They are woords of one despairing of life and saluation god being wrath and angry But chapter 34.14 when it is said If he set his hart vpon man and gather vnto him selfe his spirit and his breath Al flesh shal perish together it is not saide that the soule dooth sleepe or perish but that by the departure thereof the body dieth and is dissolued Further they adde Jf presently after death the godlie were blessed then iniurie was doone vnto them who were called againe into this mortall life But to this we aunswere That neither god can be iniurious to any man whereas he is in no mans debt neither can any thing happen better
or more acceptable vnto the godly than to serue for the manifesting of gods glory either by life or by death As Phil. 1. it is said As alwaies so now Christ shall be magnified in my body whether it bee by life or by death c. Last of all if they say that the soule hath neither sense nor action but by bodilie instruments and therefore being naked and destitute of these is destitute also of sense motion and operation To graunt vnto them this Antecedent of the soule being in the bodie yet notwithstanding of the soule freed from the bodie both learned Philosophers confesse the contrarie the word of god testifieth the contrarie as 1. Cor. 13.9 We know in part we prophecie in part but when that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shal be abolished OF EVERLASTING LIFE THIS Article is placed in the end 1. Because it is perfectlie fulfilled after the rest 2. Because it is an effect of all the other articles that is we beleeue all the other articles for this and all things that we beleeue were done that we might beleeue this article and so at length inioy euerlasting life This article is the end and roofe of our whole saluation and life The chiefe questions of euerlasting life 1 What euerlasting life is 2 Of whom it is giuen 3 To whom it is giuen 4 Wherefore it is giuen 5 When it is giuen 6 How it is giuen 7 Whether in this life wee may bee assured of euerlasting life 1 WHAT EVERLASTING LIFE IS What life is in generall LIFE is defined among Philosophers diuersly and it is indeede a word of diuers significations signifiyng diuers things In generall it is either the verie existence and being of the soul with the bodie or the operation of a liung thing that is it signifieth to be or to doe those things which are proper vnto a liuing nature for it is taken both for the first act and for the second Therefore death is the destruction of a liuing thing and of the power or facultie of woorking Or Life is an aptitude of a liuing thing to worke the operations proper vnto it and is also the operations themselues by reason of the Vnion of the bodie with the soule Generally both as touching god and Angels and men it is the existence or being of a liuing thing and the facultie or power wherewith euerie liuing thing beeing endewed dooth exercise the operations and actions of life Spirits also liue but they haue not that from life but from their very nature essence Now when we mention euerlasting life we restraine the word for then it speaketh of the euerlasting life of men Angels That is called Euerlasting 1. Which hath neither beginning nor ending Life euerlasting hath a beginning but no end 2 Which hath no beginning and hath an ending as the decrees of god 3. Which hath a beginning but shal haue no end as euerlasting life But this question seemeth vnexplicable because it is said thereof Jsai 64.4 and 1. Cor. 2.9 Neither eie hath seene neither eare hath heard neither came into mans heart the things which god hath prepared for them that loue him Yet we will see what may be knowen concerning this question of the holy Scripture 1. Life in generall signifieth to liue or to be as wee restraine beeing to a thing liuing that is to bee endued with a soule which soule is that whereby we liue and the naturall life is the remaining or dwelling of the soule in a liuing bodie and the operation of the soule or the facultie of the soule working those actions which are proper to a liuing thing For the soule is the essential forme of life which who haue liue 2. Euerlasting life is nothing else but to be as we restrain being to a regenerate man which To be The full definition of euerlasting life is to haue the Jmage of god restored according to which we were at the first created But to explane expouÌ„d this we haue need of a more ful definitioÌ„ Wherefore euerlasting life is the habitation or dwelling of god in Angels and men by the holie ghost and the true knowledge of god his will and all his woorkes kindled by the same spirite in their hearts and true and perfect righteousnes and wisedome that is a perfect conformitie and correspondence of their will and powers and operations with the minde and will of god as also a ioy resting on god and a sufficiencie of all good thinges in god as touching both soule and bodie which shall neuer be interrupted hindered or haue an end Life euerlasting is 1 The knowâ—ege of God and wisedome The proofe and confirmation of the partes of this definition is easie 1. It is the knowlege of God and wisedome Iohn 17.3 This is life eternall that they know thee to bee the onelie verie God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ 2. 2 Righteousnes It is righteousnesse Luk. 20.36 They are equall vnto the Angels 3 Ioy. 4 Sufficiencie in God and are the sonnes of God since they are the children of the resurrection 3. It is ioy Ioh. 16.22 Your ioy shall no man take from you 4. It is sufficiencie in god Reuel 21.22 The Lord god almightie and the Lambe are the Temple of it And the Citie hath no neede of the Sunne neither of the Moone to shine in it for the glorie of god did light it and the Lambe is the light of it All those good things which we possesse here shall then be perfect 1. Cor. 13.10 When that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shall be abolished 5 Without interruption 5. It shall not be interrupted Reuel 21.4 God shall wipe away all teares from their eies Luk. 1.33 Of his kingdome shall bee no end Dan. 7.27 And the kingdome and dominion and the greatnes of the kingdome vnder the whole heauen shall bee giuen to the holy people of the most high whose kingdome is an euerlasting kingdome that is which hath neither beginning nor ending 3 Euerlasting life is that which hath a beginning but is without end In this third sense also shall wee enioy euerlasting life Obiection Euerlasting life is to liue euerlastinglie But the wicked also shall be raised and be immortall because they shall liue eternally Therefore the wicked shall haue euerlasting life Answere By the name of euerlasting life is not meant the presence of the soule in the bodie that is the naturall life but this being presupposed there is furder meant a spirituall life which the holy Ghost woorketh by his proper function and office Now with the naturall life in the wicked shall bee ioyned 1. A reiection from God 2. A priuation and want of the knowledge and grace of God 3. A perpetuall and vnutterable torment and vexation Their worme shal neuer die There shall bee weeping and gnashing of teeth Here-by is vnderstoode that euerlasting
death is The euerlasting death of the wicked and is so called not because the reprobate by once dyeng shall fulfill it but because they shall die perpetuallie and shall feele perpetuall tormentes 2 Who giueth euerlasting life Euerlasting life the worke of all three Persons GOD alone giueth eternall life the Father giueth it by the son the holy ghost Of the Father it is said Ioh. 5.21 As the Father raiseth vp the dead and quickneth them so the son quickneth whom he will In which place the same is affirmed of the son also as in like maner in these folowing Ioh. 14. In him was life Isai 9.6 The Father of eternitie Iohn 10.28 I giue vnto them eternall life that is not by merit onely but also by power and working Of the Holy Ghost likewise it is saide Iohn 3.5 Except a man bee borne of water and the spirit hee can not enter into the kingdome of God Rom. 8.11 Hee that raised vp Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies by his spirit dwelling in you And this testimonie is to bee obserued for the confirmation of the Godhead of both Obiection But the ministers also giue life according to that of Paul 1. Cor. 4.15 In Christ Iesus J haue begotten you through the Gospel Aunswere Christ and the holy Ghost giue life by their owne power the ministers are onely instruments by whom Christ worketh through thâ— vertue of his spirite Replie But Christ giueth life by a communicated power Therefore not by his proper power Answere He giueth it by a power communicated but communicated from euerlasting as he was begotten from euerlasting Ioh. 5.26 As the Father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he giuen to the Sonne to haue life in himselfe 3 To whom euerlasting life is giuen EVerlasting life is giuen to all the Elect All the Elect they alone are partakers of euerlasting life and to them onely Joh. 10.28 I giue vnto them eternal life that is to my sheepe who are his elect and chosen Iohn 17.9 I pray for them I pray not for the world but for them which thou hast giuen me for they are thine and verse 12. Those that thou gauest me haue I kept and none of them is lost but the childe of perdition Againe faith and repentaunce are proper vnto the Elect only but these are part of eternal life Therefore eternal life belongeth to the Elect onely Rom. 11.7 The Elect haue obtained it and the rest haue beene hardened Wee must obserue in this place whereas the question is To whom euerlasting life is giuen that it is better to answere That eternal life is giuen to the Elect than to say it is giuen vnto the conuerted * As they are elected so theâ— are but chosen to eternall life as they are conuerted so they are in part admitted vnto it and begin to bâ— put in possession of it For conuersion and faith are the beginning of eternal life And to say Eternal life is giuen to the conuerted were all one as if you woulde say life is giuen to the liuing 4 For what cause euerlasting life is giuen THE impellent or motiue cause of euerlasting life giuen vnto vs is the alone free mercy of God For a good thing doth communicate it selfe and make others partakers of it and his loue towardes mankinde God of his â—ree mercy giueth vs for Christs sake euerlasting life that wee might praise and magnifie the same his mercy for euer And he will that euerlasting life bee giuen vs and himselfe giueth the same vnto vs for the alone intercession and merit of Christ imputed vnto vs by the comming and interposing whereof gods mercy is more illustrated and manifested than without it But no work of man either foreseene in vs or present is the cause of this eternall life whereunto notwithstanding wee are brought by many meanes Before the beginning of eternal life our woorkes merit eternall death after the beginning thereof all our woorkes are effectes thereof and nothing is cause of it selfe The final cause or end for which eternal life is giuen vs is that the mercy of God might be acknowledged and magnified of vs. Eph. 1.6 To the praise of the glorie of his grace wherewith hee hath made vs accepted in his beloued For the same cause God giueth vs eternall life for which hee chose vs. 5 When euerlasting life is giuen Euerlasting life is beguâ— here by conuersion IN this life is giuen the beginning of eternal life and that necessarily For vnto whom life euerlasting is not begunne to be giuen here that is who beginneth not here to feele a part of eternal life to wit faith and conuersion vnto him life euerlasting shal neuer be giuen after this life 2. Corinth 5.2 Therefore we sigh desiring to be clothed with our house which is from heauen Because that if we be clothed we shal not bee found naked It is consuÌ„mated in the worlde to come by glorification The consummation of euerlasting life is after this life for vnto whom euerlasting life is begunne to bee giuen here to them shal it be giuen finished compleate and consummated And of this consuÌ„mation ther are two degrees one when the soule is presently carried into heauen because by the death of the bodie we are freed from all infirmitie the other degree is greater higher and more glorious when in the resurrection of the bodies the soules shall againe be vnited to their bodies because after the resurrection we shal be made glorious and shall see God euen as hee is Iohn 5.24 He that heareth my word and beleeueth in him that sent mee hath euerlasting life and shall not come into condemnation but hath passed from death to life 1. Iohn 3.2 Nowe are wee the Sonnes of GOD but yet it dooth not appeare what wee shall bee and wee knowe that when hee shal appeare we shal bee like him for we shal see him as he is 6 How euerlasting life is giuen vnto vs. EVerlasting life is giuen vnto vs by the holy Ghost God giueth vâ— euerlasting â—iâ—â— by the outwâ— ministerie 〈◊〉 thâ—â—warde miâ— of the spirit and the holy Ghost giueth it vs in this life by the ministerie of the word by the worde he worketh in vs the knowledge of God and his wil This knowledge hath following it a study and desire more and more to know God and to liue according to the prescript of his will It is giuen heere vnto infants so that they haue an inclination to repentaunce and faith But the consummation and accomplishment of euerlasting life shal be giuen vs after this life immediately Now that it is heere giuen vs mediately by the woorde is prooued by plaine testimonies of Scripture John 6.68 Whither shall wee goe say the Disciples Thou hast the words of life 1. Corint 4.15 Jn Christ Jesus J haue begotten you through the gospel Rom. 116. The gospell is the power of
it and is true Aunswere This is also a begging of that which is in question They must proue that Christ said his bodie was in vnder with the bread And further a man may speake figuratiuely and yet speake perspicuouslie and plainly Reply He is also omnipotent Therefore he is able to be eueriewhere and so in the bread Aunswere Albeit he were able to bring to passe that two flat repugnaunt thinges should be true together yet wil he not doe it Againe God is not able to woorke contradictories or thinges flat repugnaunt because he is true Now to wil those thinges which are contradictorie argueth a lier Wherefore wee deny not the trueth and omnipotency of God but these mens lies nay rather we defend gods truth affiming that God doth that which he spake But they oppugne it making contrary wils to be in God Replie Christs bodie hath manie prerogatiues not agreeable to our bodies as that he was borne of a Virgine walked on the sea was at one time and together in the graue in Hel and in Parâ—dise and passed through the gates when they were fast shut Aunswere These examples are partly not matches partly false For this may agree vnto a creature to walke on the waters as it did vnto Peter to passe through the gates shut as is agreeable to the nature of a spirit Againe These examples are not matches nor of the same qualitie with that which is in question Because these doe not â—mply a contradiction For when hee is saide to bee borne of a Virgine he is not said withal not to be borne of a Virgine But to be both finite and infinite as they wil haue Christs body who consubstantiate it with the bread these implie a contradiction Now it is false that they saie that hee passed thorough the gateâ— shut whereas the gates might yeelde and oâ—en vnto him as also that he passed through the doore or stone of the graue when as it is said that the Angell did open it and lastly when they saie that Christes bodie was at once and together in moe places which they seeme to haue taken out of Austine But Austine said That his bodie was in the graue his soule in hel and his Godhead eueriewhere 3 They reason from a circumstance of the time The same night in which hee was betraied No man which speaketh seriously speaketh figuratiuely Christ instituting his supper spake seriously Therefore without any figure Aunswere I denie the Maior because by that position no man that speaketh seriously should speak figuratiuely which is most false God speaketh in all sacraments though figuratiuely yet seriously I haue earnestly desired saith Christ to eate this Passeouer with you Wherefore I aunswere that he vseth not iesting or obscure figures This figure is perspicuous because it is vsual and his disciples speak so Where wilt thou that wee goe and prepare that thou maiest eate the passouer It is vsuall also in all sacraments It is forcible and emphaticall because it expresseth the similitude of the signe and the thing signified and the certainetie of the coniunction of both in the right vse and administration Againe we inuert their reason and say Because christ spake seriously therefore he vsed a figure which doth well expresse and declare the thing Replie Christ sayd This cup is the new testament Jn wils and testaments men speake properly Christ here instituteth a sacrament therefore c. Answere I denie the Maior and inuert the reason for seeing hee would institute a sacrament therefore hee spake figuratiuely calling his Supper the new Testament which is figuratiuely to be vnderstoode for these two reasons 1. Because otherwise there should be two couenants the one proper and the other the supper 2. Otherwise also they should be shut out from Gods couenant who cannot come to the supper and all who came to the supper should be in the couenant Obiection Christ saith In my bloud Therefore the real bloud of christ is in the supper and is drunke by the mouth Aunswere Wee conclude the contrarie rather by those woordes of Christ Because the newe testament was made by Christs bloud shed on the Crosse and applied vnto vs by faith not drunke by the mouth for otherwise they shoulde bee excluded from the testament and couenaunt who were not able to come to this sacrament Replie There is a great force in the woord Newe That which was doone in the old testament typicallie is done in the new reallie Aunswere If they adde Therefore doone by the mouth of the bodie they bring in more in the conclusion than was in the antecedent For there was no type in the olde testament which did signifie the eating of Christ with the mouth 2. We inuert their reason Christs bodie was no otherwise eaten in the new testament than in the olde But in the old it was eaten spirituallie onely Therefore in the new also it is so eaten Reply The newe testament differeth from the olde because in that were types in the newe is the bodie it selfe Heb. 9. Col. 2. Aunswere This difference of the old and new testament is no where set downe in holy scripture that Christ is eaten in the old not really and in the newe corporally by the mouth In the places which are alleadged out of the Apostle the bodie signifieth that the shadow was onely of the old testament and was accomplished and fulfilled by Christ Because there the bodie is opposed to those shadowes and further because he calleth it the bodie of christ which kinde of speech sheweth that by Christ was wrought the accomplishment fulfilling of the types or shadowes of the Old Testament Moreouer albeit wee haue Christ exhibited in the newe testament and hee is there borne man yet notwithstanding it dooth not therefore folow hereof that his bodie is in the bread but onely that it is in the new testament 4 They reason from the consent of the Euangelists and sainâ— Paul Matthew as Theophylact calculateth writ his gospel eight yeares after christs assension Marke ten yeares Luke fifteene yeares Paul twentie yeares And all vse the same words A speech that is often vttered with the same wordes is not figuratiue Such is the speech of the Lordes Supper Therefore it is not figuratiue Answere It is false that a speech often vttered in the same words is not figuratiue because when a figure is conspicuous knowen and forcible as this it is reteined Againe the Euangelists repeat the woordes of Christ because hee spake figuratiuely Often though it bee figuratiue is this repeated He shal baptize with the holie Ghost and with fier Ioh. 1. Matth. 3. Moreouer we denie that this speech of Christs Supper was repeated by all in the same wordes 1. Because Matthew and Mark say This is my bloud of the new testament Luke saith This cup is the new testament in my bloud 2. Matthew and Marke say This is my bodie Luke addeth which is giuen for you Paul which is broken for you 3.
to haue ascended from a lower place into an higher and to remaine in heauen vntill hee come to iudgement Nowe that some except That Christ dooth descend from heauen as oft as the supper is administred it is already refuted 4 We take not awaie the doctrine of the properties of christs humanitie Answere They altogether take it away For they wil haue his humane nature to be such as is not seene nor felt nor limited in place Reply But christ did put off these infirmities reteined the essential properties Answere But these are verie essential properties which being taken away the verity also and truth of his humane nature is taken awaie Austine saith Take awaie from bodies their spaces and they shall be no where 5 We abolish not the Doctrine concerning the communicating of properties of both natures Aunswere Yea but they endeuour it For they apply those properties of his diuine nature which are affirmed of the whole person in the concrete to both natures J wil be with you to the ende of the world This they vnderstand of both natures which is all one as if when it is said Christ God and man was circumcised one should thus conclude Therefore the godhead of Christ was circumcised as wel as his flesh Replie This onelie wee adde That those Articles belong to them Aunswere After this sort all sectes may shift off all testimonies of Scriptures But they belong hither and that by a double right 1. Because they are written of the bodie of Christ But the body of Christ belongeth to the supper Therefoâ—e these Articles also belong hither For they shew how Christs bodie is to be eaâ—en 2 They belong hither because no Article of faith is at variaunce with another So belongeth hither also the Doctrine of iustification because in the â—upper no other iustice or righteousnes must bee sought for but by the bloud of Christ 6 The manner how we eate it is not to bee defined Answere They commit a double fault in so saying 1. When they denie that the maner is to be defined and so contradict and gain saie the Scripture which defineth it and sheweth that it is spiritual that there is wrought an vnion with Christ by faith through the holy Ghost 2. They themselues define the manner as it clearly appeareth by their writings 7 The saieng of Durandus is true We heare the woords we perceiue the motions we know not the manner we beleeue the presence Aunswere Durandus maketh nought either for you or against vs or for himselfe because he was a Papist And againe if his saying be rightly vnderstoode we may admit it We heare the words This is my bodie not that we eate with our mouth the bodie of Christ in the breade Wee perceiue the motions that is we perceiue the bread to enter into our mouth not the bodie of Christ We know not the maner that is not perfectly to wit after what maner the holy Ghost is eueriewhere whole in Christ and in al the Saints and how he vniteth vs in Christ We beleeue the presence namely such as is the eating and as is the vnion of the members and the head 8 We teach this onelie That the bodie and bloud of christ is trulie substantiallie and naturallie exhibited Aunswere Wee grant that we eat the true bodie of Christ So then is their disputation vaine and friuolous First Because they confesse that wee are made partakers of the true bodie of christ and that wee must not question of the manner For this wee graunt Secondly Because the reasons and refutations which they bring are of no weight or moment Certaine reasons whereby is proued That the bodie of Christ is not present either in or vnder or at the bread of the Lords Supper neither is corporallie eaten Vnder With Jn or At the Bread 1 BEcause hee tooke a true humane nature Whereunto wee ad also that wee cannot eate him otherwise than his disciples did in the first Supper 2. He truely ascended out of earth into heauen 3. Such is our eating of him as his abiding is in vs. 4. All the Saints of the old and new Testament haue the same vnion with Christ 5 Christ onely is able to offer himselfe vnto his Father Now it is necessarie in the vse of the Supper to craue of God remission of sinnes Wherefore if he bee present at the bread we must craue of him and so wee offer the bread But in the New testament it is not lawfull to direct our prayer to any certaine place 6. The blessings which are promised vnto the godly onely are spirituall Vnto these and other fore alleaged reasons commeth the consent of the auncient Fathers Ambrose Athanasius Austine Basil Bede Bertram Chrysostome ClemeÌ„s Alexandrinus the councell of Nice Ciprian Cyrill Denis Gelasius Gregorie the Great Gregorie Nazianzene Hezichius Hierom Hilarie Irenaeus Justine Leo Macharius Origen Procopius Gaza Tertullian and so forth THE SECOND APPENDIX OR ADDITION Arguments whereby the opinion of Vbiquitaries is refelled and the truth of sound doctrine confirmed THE FIRST ARGVMENT THE Marcionites and Manichees imagined that Christ had not a true and solid bodie but onely made shew of the shape of a bodie so that hee seemed onely to haue flesh and bones whereas indeed hee had them not And further that the verie incarnation and al the motions and operations of christ did but only seeme so in outward appearaÌ„ce whereas in the truth of the thing there was no such thing done Now the opinion of Vbiquitie and of the reall communicating of the properties of both natures doth raise againe from Hel that phantasticall dotarie and frensie of those heretiques Therefore it is no lesse to bee abandoned and banished out of the church to Hell than that heresie of the Manichees That this opinion of Vbiquitie doth giue life againe to the former wee proue The Vbiquitaries are of opinion and so teach That all the properties of the Godhead were presently from the verie point of Christs conception reallie effused from the Godhead of the woorde into the humane nature which christ tooke Hence these absurdities will folow 1. Christ shall not be truely borne of the Virgine if as touching the nature of his humanitie he was truely and essentiallie without the wombe of his mother before hee was borne and after hee was borne hee remained no lesse truely and substantiallie as touching his humanitie in that selfe-same wombe than before 2. Christ was not truely weake in his humane nature and subiect to passions if hee were then also as touching the same nature partaker of the Diuine maiestie and omnipotencie 3. Hee was not truely dead if also in the time of his death as touching his soule and bodie hee were essentiallie present euerie where together with his Godhead For the soul being euerie where present could not be really separated in distance of places from the bodie which also should be euerie where present and so neither could the body die but onely
in outward appearance and imagination 4. Hee ascended not truely into heauen but it shall be saide to haue beene onely a vaine and imaginarie and phantasticall spectacle if hee were in his bodie substantiallie there before hee visiblie ascended thither and after he was ascended thither he remained yet in the substantiall presence of the same bodie no lesse truely than before on the earth yea and in the verie bodies also of the faithfull If these thinges so fel out in the truth of the thing it will follow that the same bodie of Christ was indeede at once and together both weake and omnipotent base and glorious subiect to sufferinges and not subiect dead and aliue limited and vnlimited which is horrible to affirme For auoiding therefore of these prodigious and impious absurdities they will except that he was not as touching his body otherwise than limited weak subiect to passions and mortal in the time of his humiliation because he had debased himselfe and would not shew forth that maiestie communicated vnto his bodie before his resurrection Aunswere They interpret amisse that debasing of himselfe of all the glorie and maiestie of his humanity hidden and kept close for a time whereas it is to bee vnderstoode in respect of the diuinitie of the Worde in that hee woulde take the forme of a seruant that is the masse of our nature and become man Moreouer it will folow that christ did shew forth the communicated power and maiesty of his flesh euen then when he was indeed weak and limited or circumscribed in bodie as when shedding teares he raised Lazarus from the dead and when being apprehended by the Iewes hee healed Malchus whom Peter wounded Now what is it else to raise the Marcionites vp againe from hell or in the greatest matter of all others impiously to blaspheme if this bee not THE SECOND ARGVMENT THE blasphemie of Samosatenus Arrius the late Antitrinitaries is this That Christ man is not properlie and by nature God but onlie by an accidental participation of diuine properties maiestie honour power and vertue The Vbiquitaries also maintaine the same consideration of the God-heade of Christ man while they define the personall vnion by his communicating alone of properties whereby the flesh of Christ is made omnipotent and euerie where So that now that man is and is called God not that he is properlie by nature God but because infinit power maiestie and glorie is giuen him from God and all the gifts of the holie Ghost are bestowed on him without measure Now this accidentall bestowing of the Godhead and all the properties doth not make christ to be properlie and by nature God but onelie by diuine grace or God vnproperlie so called Because it is not the verie essential God-head of the Word but a certaine participation thereof in vertue and effâ—cacie And therefore was it obiected by the sounder Fathers vnto the Arrians that they tooke awaie the true and eternall God-head of christ when they made him a God not by nature but by grace by participation onlie of dignitie and maiestie Therefore seeing the Vbiquitaries also equalling our Immanuel with God by participation of properties onlie take awaie his true and eternal God head wee doe disclâ—me and accurse this their doctrine as blasphemous and heretical And that they doe this Brentius in recog p. 20. Andrae Thes 20. disp Tubing and Thes 25. and 26. And Apol. Ing. 26. their owne words and opinions witnesse as Brentius and Iacobus Andraeas and others of them in their writings Whence wee conclude that the Vbiquitaries holde the same opinion with the Arrians and Antitrinitaries of the God-head of Christ manâ— that is that all these esteem him for God not by nature but onely by grace of participation new temporarie created adopted If these thinges bee true Christ shal not bee God and man but a diuine man such as the Vbiquitaries also repute him who as Seruetus Lib. 1. de Trinicate hold this opinion That God can communicate the fulnes of his God-heade giue his diuinitie maiestie power and glorie vnto man But wee execrate and detest the same blasphemie of both THE THIRD ARGVMENT NEstorius taught That the vnion of God the Word with man was wrought by the participation onelie of equality as touching maiesty honour power vertue and operation Neither doth he make the differeÌ„ce of the dwelling of the Word in mans nature which himselfe tooke and in other Saintes to consist in anie other thing than in those giftes and graces bestowed by God on man The selfe same also doe the Vbiquitaries teach because they crie that there is no difference betweene the inhabiting and dwelling of the God-head in Peter and in Christ except it bee taken from the communication of the giftes or properties of the God-heade And they contend that by this means this man which was takeÌ„ by the Word is God because the Word doth nothing without him but al things by him This is nothing els than to make christ man onelie God by an accident Wherefore the doctrine of Vbiquitie is altogether the same with Nestorius heresie Tertullian saith Tertul. lib. de Trinit p. 610. Jf Christ be man onlie how then is he present eueriewhere being called vpon and inuocated seeing this is not the nature of man but of God to be able to be present in al places By this testimony is refuted the Vbiquity of the human nature in Christ Obiect But the vnion of the diuine human nature in Christ is vnseparable Therefore wheresoeuer the diuine nature is there is also the humane nature Aunsw It is true which is said that the vnion is vnseparable The Worde neuer forsaketh the nature once assumed and taken But the Word is not in the humane nature as the soule is included in my bodie Wheresoeuer my bodie is there must my soule needes be neither is my soul at the same time without my bodie But the Worde is not so in Christ man but hee is so vnseparably and personally in the humane nature as that he is together also without the humane nature in all the partes of the world as hee filleth al and in holy men and Angels by his special presence The personall vnion of both natures dooth not euert the general action and woorking of his presence and maiestie neither doth it let or hinder the speciall woorking of his presence because the Word is effectual and worketh forcibly in the regenerate The generall points wherein the churches which professe the Gospell agree or disagree in the controuersie concerning the Lordes Supper They agree in these points FIRST that as wel the Supper of the Lord as Baptisme is a visible pledge and testimonie annexed by Christ himselfe to the promise of grace to this ende chiefly that our faith in this promise might be confirmed and strengthned Secondly that in the true vse of the supper as well as in al other sacraments two things are giuen by god vnto vs
anie means and for the creatures although it be lawful to expesse them yet god forbiddeth notwithstanding their images to be made or had as thereby to woorship or d Exo. 23.24 34.13.14 17. Num. 33.52 Deut. 7.5 12.3 16.22 2. Reg. 18.4 honour either them or god by them c 1. Sam. 15.23 Deu. 12.30 c. Mat. 15.9 98 But maie not images be tolerated in Churches which may serue for bookes vnto the common people No. For it is not seemly that we should be wiser than god who will haue his church to bee e 2 Tim. 3.16.17 2. Pet. 1.19 taught with the liuely preaching of his worde and not with dumb f Iere. 10 8. c. Hab. 2.18 19. images 99 What doth God decree in the third Commaundement That not only by cursing or g Leuic 24.11 c. Leuit. 19.12 forswearing but also by h Mat 5 37. Iac. 5.12 rash swearing wee shoulde not vse his name despitefully or vnreuerently neither shuld by silence or conniuence bee partakers of these horrible sinnes in others But that wee i Jes 45.23 vse the sacred and holie name of God euer with great deuotion and reuerence that he may be k 1. Tim. 2.8 worshipped and honoured by vs with a true and stedfast l Rom. 2.24 1. Tim. 6.1 Col. 3.16.17 confession and m Mat. 10.32 inuocation of his name lastly in al our woords and actions whatsoeuer 100 Is it then so grieuous a sinne by swearing or banning to take the name of God in vaine as that God is also angrie with them who as much as in them lieth doe not forbid or hinder it Surely most a Leuit. 5.1 grieuous For neither is there any sinne greater or more offending God than the dispiting of his sacred name Wherefore also hee b Leuit. 24.15.16 would haue this sinne to bee punished with death 101 May a man sweare also religiously and lawfully by the name of God He may when as either the magistrate exacteth it or otherwise necessitie requireth by this meanes the faith and truth of any man or thing to be ratified and established whereby both the glorie of God may bee aduanced and the safetie of others procured For this kinde of swearing is c Deut. 6.13 10.20 Is 48.1 Heb. 6.16 ordained by Gods word and therefore was wel d Gen. 21.24 31.53 Jos 9.15.19 1. Sam. 24.22 2. Sam. 3.35 1. Reg. 1.29 Rom. 1.9 vsed of the Fathers both in the olde and newe Testament 102 Is it lawfull to sweare by Saints or other creatures No For a lawefull oth is an inuocation of God whereby we desire that he as the onely searcher of hearts beare witnesse vnto the trueth and punish the swearer if hee wittingly e 2. Cor. 1.23 sweare falsely But this honour f Mat. 5.34.35.36 Iac. 5.12 agreeth to no creature 103 What doth God commaunde in the fourth commandement First that the ministery of the gospel and the schooles of learning should be g Tit. 1.5 1. Tim. 3.14.15 1. Cor. 9.11 13.14 2. Tim. 1.2 3.15 1. Tim. 4.13.14.15.16 5.17 maintained and that I both at other times and especially on holy daies should h Psal 68.26 40.9.10 Act. 2.42.46 frequent studiouslie diuine assemblies i 1. Cor. 14 19.29.31 heare the word of God diligently vse the k 1. Cor. 11.33 Sacraments l 1. Tim. 2.1.2.3.8.9 1. Cor. 14.16 ioine my praiers with the common praiers of the assemblie and bestowe some thing according to my abilitie m 1. Cor 16.2 on the poore And further that all my life-time I bee free from misdeeds or euil actions yeelding vnto the lord that he may by his holy spirit woorke in mee his worke and so I may n Js 66.23 begin in this life that euerlasting Sabboth 104 What doth God inioyne vs in the fift commandement That we yeelde due honor loue faithfulnes to our Parentes and so to all who bear rule ouer vs a Eph. 6.1.2.5 c. Col. 3.18.20.22.23.24 Eph. 5.22 Prou. 1.8.4.1 15.20 20.20 Exo. 21.17 Rom. 13.1 submit our selues with such obedience as is meete to their faithful commaundements and chastisementes And further also that by our patience wee b Prou. 23. â—â— Gen. 9.25 1. Pet. 2.18 beare and suffer their vices and maners â—uer thinking with our selues that god will c Eph. 6.4.9 Col. 3.19 21. Rom. 13. Mat. 22.21 gouerne and guide vs by their hand 105 What dooth God exact in the sixt commaundement That neither in thought nor in gesture muchlesse in deede I reproch or hate or harme or d Mat. 5.12.22 Gen. 9.6 Mat. 26.52 kil my neighbour either by my selfe or by another but e Eph. 4 26. Rom. 12.19 Mat. 5.25 18.35 cast away al desire of reuenge Furthermore that I hurt not my selfe or cast my selfe wittinglie into anie daunger Wherefore also that murthers might not be committed f Rom. 13.14 Col. 2.23 Syraâ— 3.27 Mat. 4.7 hee hath g Gen. 9.6 Exod. 21.14 Mat. 26.52 Rom. 13.4 armed the Magistrate with the sword 106 But this commaundement seemeth to forbid murther only But in forbidding murther god dooth further teach that he hateth the roote and cause of murther to wit h Iac. 1.20 Gal. 5.20 anger i Rom. 1.29 enuy k 1. Joh. 2.9.11 hatred and desire of reuenge and doth l 1. Ioh. 3.15 account them al for murther 107 Is it enough then that we kil no man in such sort as hath beene said It is not enough For when god condemneth anger enuy hatred he requireth that wee m Mat. 22.39 7.12 loue our neighbour as our selues and that he vse n Rom. 12.10 humanity lenitie curtesie o Eph. 4.2 Gal. 6.1.2 Mat. 5.5 Rom. 12.18 Mat. 57. Luc. 6.3.6 patience and p Exod. 23.5 mercie towards him q Mat. 5.45 turne awaie from him as much as we may whatsoeuer maie be hurtful vnto him In a word that we be so affected in mind as that we r Rom. 12 20.2â— stick not to do good also vnto our enemies 108 What is the meaning of the seuenth commandement That god hath in Å¿ Leu. 18.27.28 execrational turpitude and filthines therefore we also must Iud. 22.23 vtterly hate and detest it and contrariwise liue temperately modestly and a 1. Thes 4.3.4.5 chastly whether we b Heb. 13.4 1. Cor. 7.4 liue in holy wedlock or in single life 109 Forbiddeth God nothing else in this commandement but adulterie and such kinds of vnclearnes Seeing both our bodie and soule are the temples of the holy ghost god wil haue vs to possesse both in puritie holines And therefore deeds gestures c Eph. 5 3. 1. Cor. 6.18.9 20. woordes thoughtes d Mat. 5.27.28 filthie lustes and whatsoeuer entiseth a man vnto these al that hee wholy e Eph. 5.18.19
affect an excellencie aboue others but to bee well contented with those gifts which God hath giuen vs and to employ all our gifts studies to the glorie of God the safetie of our neighbours euen those which are of the baser and vnwoorthier sort neither at anie time to murmour against GOD if wee faile of our hope or if wee bee despised but in all things to ascribe the praise of wisdome iustice vnto God 1. Cor 4.6 These thinges I haue figuratiuelie applied vnto mine owne selfe and Apollos for your sakes that yee might learne by vs that no man presume aboue that which is written that one swell not against another for anie mans cause For who separateth thee And what hast thou that thou hast not receiued 1. Pet. 5.5 God resisteth the proud and giueth grace to the humble Humble your selues therefore vnder the mightie hand of god that he may exalt you in due time Matth. 18.4 Whosoeuer shal humble himselfe as this title child the same is the greatest in the kingdome of heauen Phil. 2.3 Doe nothing through contention or vaine glorie but in meekenesse of minde euerie man esteeme other better than himselfe 4 Patience is the knowledge agnising of Gods Maiestie wisedome iustice goodnesse resoluing through a confidence in gods promises and so in hope of gods assistance deliuering to obey god in suffering those euils aduersities which he sendeth on vs willeth vs to suffer neither in respect of the griefe which they bring to murmur against God or to doe any thing against his commandements but in our dolor griefe to retaine still the confidence and hope of gods assistaunce and to aske deliueraunce of him and by this knowledge and ful persuasion of Gods will to mitigate and assuage our griefe and paines Humilitie and Patience belong vnto the first commaundement not onely because they are partes of that internall obedience which god requireth immediately to be performed vnto him but also because they follow and accompany the true knowledge confidence loue and fear of god as necessarie effects of the same 5 Hope is a sure and certaine expectation of euerlasting life freelie to be giuen for Christes sake and of a mitigation or assuagement of present euils and of a deliueraunce from the same euils of this life and lastly an expecting and looking for al blessinges necessarie vnto saluation according to the counsell and will of God Now hope springeth from faith Because he that is certain of the present wil of God towardes him hath also certaine and assured promises of the time to come For God is not changed and the giftes and calling of God are without repentance Moreouer Faith and Hope differ in these considerations Faith embraceth the present benefites of god and his wil towardes vs. Hope embraceth the effectes and fruites which are to come of this present and perpetual wil of god Heb. 11.1 Faith is that which maketh those things to be which are hoped for and which sheweth those thinges which are not seen Hope that is seene is not hope for how can a man hope for that which he seeth 6 The loue of god is to acknowledge God to bee exceeding good and exceeding bountifull and mercifull not only in himselfe but also in vs and towards vs and that therefore he dooth employ his power wisedome iustice mercy goodnes to our saluation so through the acknowledging of this his infinit goodnes towards vs to loue God as that we more couet and desire our conioyning and conformity with him and the execution of his will than all other things whatsoeuer and further had rather leaue and relinquish all thinges than be bereaued of his communion and fellowship or offend him in any thing and are ready to part with all other thinges which wee loue for his sake nothing is more cared for of vs than how we maie doe thinges acceptable and gratefull vnto him 7 The feare of God is to acknowledge the infinit anger of God towards sinne his great power to punish sinne his wisedome and iustice and that right and dominion which he hath ouer al creatures and of the contrary to acknowledge our owne corruption and infirmity and therefore to submit our selues to god according to all his commaundementes and to account for the greatest euil our offending of God and estranging from him and in respect thereof highly to hate and detest al sinne and to bee ready rather to suffer al other euils whatsoeuer than that we will offend god in any thing Leuit. 14 19. Thou shalt fear the Lord thy god because J am the Lord. Ier. 10.7 Who would not fear thee O King of natiōs For to thee appertaineth the dominion for among al the wise men of the Gentiles and in all their kingdomes there is none like thee The feare and loue of god differ For the loue of god ariseth from a knowledge of gods goodnesse The fear of god ariseth from a knowledge of gods iustice and of his power to punish sinnes and of that right which he hath ouer al creatures Againe Loue pursueth good to wit god and our coniunction with him wherefore the loue of god is not to abide to be bereaued of god who is the chiefe good But fear flieth euill to wit the displeasure and wrath of god and our separation from him Wherefore also the fear of god is to beware that we offend not god Moreouer the fear of god which was in the nature of man vncorrupt differeth from that which is now in the regenerate in this life and which is in the blessed Angels and Saintes in the celestial life The feare of god which is in the blessed in euerlasting life is a high detestation of sinne and punishmentes without griefe because neither anie sinne is in them or any punishment of sin and they are assured that they shall neuer sinne or be punished Jsa 25.8 Hee wil destroie death for euer and the Lord God wil wipe awaie the tears from al faces The feare of god which is in the regenerate in this life is an acknowledging of sinne and the wrath of god an earnest griefe for the sinnes committed for the offending of god and for those calamities which by reason of sinnes both we and others susteine and a feare of future sins and punishments and an earnest desire of flying and shunning these euils by reason of the knowledge of that mercy which is shewed vnto vs through Christ Matth. 10.28 Feare yee not them which kil the bodie but are not able to kil the soule but rather feare him which is able to destroie both soule and bodie in hell Luk. 23.40 Fearest thou not god seeing that thou art in the same condemnation This feare is commonly called Sonne-like feare because it is such as Sonnes beare towardes their parents who are sorrie for the anger and displeasure of their father and yet notwithstanding are alwaies persuaded of the loue and mind of their father
science of casting caruing and painting is reckoned among those artes and craftes which are profitable for mans life Exod. 31.3 35.30 c. Syrac 38.28 and are the gifts of god Neither is the reason hereof hard or obscure because writing and painting are profitable for the memoriall of thinges doone for ornaments and for an ingenuous and liberall delight of mans life Wherefore the Law forbiddeth not the vse of Images but the abuse namely it forbiddeth that Images be made as by them to represent or woorship god For we ought not neither can we any way paint or graue or represent god much lesse must we tie gods woorshippe vnto carued or grauen Images This Doctrine doth the end scope of the commandement declare which is the obseruation of the vncorrupt worship of god And because god is incorporeall and infinite vnpossible is it that he should bee expressed or represented by any corporeall or finite image without an impairing of his diuine maiesty Esay 40.18 Rom 1 23. Deut. 4.15 To whome will ye liken God Or what similitude will ye set vp vnto him Moreouer as god will not haue himselfe to be engrauen or painted or anie Image or semblance of him to bee câ—â—ued and framed so also doth it not at all profit or auaile vs as being a cause an occasion of Idolatry 2 Why Images are to be abolished in the Churches of Christians Exod 23.24 34.13 Numb 33 25. Deut 7.5 1. Reg. 15.13 2. Reg 10.30 2. Reg. 18.4 Deut. 17 23. c. 1. Cor. 10.20 1 THey are to be abolished because of the commaundement of god who will haue Idoles to be abolished and all the corruptions of the true worshippe of god of true doctrine as his wrath anger against Idolatrie dooth testifie And hereof is it that for the taking away abolishing of Idols Iehu Ezechias and Iosias are praised in Scripture Jn respect of our confession of the syncere worship of god and of our hatred against Idolatrie 1. Iohn 5.21 This confession whereby we professe our selues not to be Idolaters consisteth not only in words but also in actions and in outward shew and signes 3 They are to be abolished for auoiding of offence superstition least by retaining of ancient Images or by substituting adding new the same daÌ„ger come to the church to the ignoraÌ„t people therby which in times past we see to haue issued hence and so the enimies of the Church be by this spectacle hauing so great a shew of Idolatry the more alienated from the Church so that they despite and reproch therefore the trueth of god So the Iewes because they see Images in the Churches of those which professe Christianity are greatly offended And wee see that Images neuer brought any good to them which had them but euen gods own people was seduced thereby as we may see often in the sacred storie especially in the booke of Iudges the Kings in the Prophets So prone and readie is our nature vnto this euill which hath after ensuing it most grieuous punishments as are those which the Lord reciteth by Moses besides many others I wil destroy saith he your high places and cut awaie your Jmages and cast your carkasses vpon the bodies of your Idoles and my soule shal abhor you In like manner also the Angel of the Lord vpbraiding the Israelites that they had made a league with the Idolatrous Cananites saith Wherefore I will not cast them out before you but they shall bee as thornes vnto your sides and their gods shall be your destruction It is no ceremony therefore to abolish Images seeing they are the instruments signes causes and occasions of Idolatry Neither are the causes of this commandement any way chaunged or diminished as namelie that the glory of god be maintained against Idolaters and the enemies of the church and that god bee not tempted through offering an occasion of superstition and of conceiuing false and corrupt opinions of gods worship vnto men which are of their owne accord inclining and prone vnto idolatry Wherefore this commaundement of taking away and abolishing images made for the representing of god or for diuine worshippe is Moral and dureth perpetuallie 3 Howe images are to be abolished IN abolishing and banishing Images two things are to be obserued 1. That the doctrine concerning the true woorship of God bee preached before the abolishing of Idols So wee read that Iosias did Let the woord therefore go before the idoles wil fal to the grouÌ„d 2. The images their altars the like instruments of idolatrie must be taken away not by priuat men but by publick autoritie For so hath god commanded the Israelites so likewise hath godly Kings put it in practise so also Paul disliking the Idoles of the Athenians Ephesians did not yet pul them downe or abolish them Certaine obiections of the Papists 1 VVE worship not the Jmages but God of whom those are signs and tokens Wherefore there is no cause why images shoulde bee abolished and taken out of churches Answere It is impiety to place and ordaine such signes as whereby God neither can bee truly signified neither at all ought to be signified And albeit they were such signes as whereby God might bee truely signified yet is it not in the power of any creature to ordain or establish them but only in the wil and pleasure of God 2 The bookes of Lai-men or the vnlearned are profitable Jmages are the bookes of the vnlearned Therefore they are profitable Aunswere 1. Such bookes of Lay-men are profitable as are deliuered vnto them by God 2. The Minor is false For the Prophetes teach far otherwise as Haba 2.18 An image is a teacher of lies Zacha. 10.2 The Jdoles haue spoken vanitie Whence we maie thus reason We ought not to speak vain things or to lie of God either in words or in gestures But wood or grauen Jmages are lies of God because they cannot represent God yea because they swarue so farre and carrie vs with them from God at their figure and shape is vnlike god so consequently they cause vs also to lie of God If then we wil not lie of god we must needs neither make nor haue anie Images or grauen semblances For as Ieremie saith 10.8 The stock is a doctrine of vanitie Nowe in this sense we graunt Images to be the books of the vnlearned to witte because partly they teach and signifie false things of God and partly because through the reuerence of the thing signified and the place when as they stand to the open view in churches and elsewhere they easily draw away others vnto superstition and teach the people Idolatry as experience sufficiently beareth witnes 3. It followeth not if it were so that Images did teach the vnlearned that therefore they should be reteined in the church as profitable books For God wil not haue his church to be taught by these but by his
viewing of mens hearts the hearing of them and infinite wisedome and knowledge But God onely is the viewer of our hearts Iohn 2.25 Hee knewe what was in man 4. By whom wee sweare vnto him we giue and ascribe the executing of punishment and omnipotencie as whereby he must maintaine the truth and punish him that lieth But God alone is omnipotent and executour of punishment Matth. 10.28 Feare ye not them which kill the bodie but are not able to kill the soule but rather feare him which is able to destroie both soule and bodie in hell Wherefore we may not sweare by any but onely by God and therefore such oathes as are sworne by Saintes are idolatrous and forbidden of God Obiection But Joseph sware by the life of Pharaoh Therefore it is lawfull to sweare also by men or creatures Aunswere Some graunt that hee sinned in so doing namely that hee erred following the custome of the gentiles who were wont to sweare by Kings that thereby he might keep close from his brethren who he was but we may make aunswere otherwise also namely that it was not properly an oath but onely an asseueration made for to shewe the euidence of the thing comparing it with a thing which was certaine and euident so that the tenure and meaning of such asseuerations is that those thinges which are auouched are as certaine as that man certainly liueth whom he that sweareth nameth as being knowen and yet liuing or so certain as hee that sweareth certainely wisheth that man to liue whom he nameth So also shall the meaning of Iosephs asseueration be as Pharao liueth that is as truly as Pharaoh liueth or is in safetie or as truely as I wish him to liue and to be in safety so truely say I these thinges The same sense and meaning is to be rendered of the like 3 Of what thinges we are to sweare VVEE must sweare 1. Of such thinges as are true because he that sweareth of things that are false maketh God witnes of a lie 2. Of things that are certaine for he that sweareth of vncertaine things sweareth with an euill conscience and with a contempt of God when as hee dareth to make God a witnes of that thing which hee knoweth not whether it be a truth or a lie and he that so sweareth it is all one to him whether hee make God witnesse of a lie or of a truth and withall hee desireth that either God will beare witnes vnto a lie or if hee will not bee accounted the witnes of a lie that then hee will punish him that sweareth 3. Of lawfull thinges for hee that sweareth of vnlawful thinges maketh God both a fauourer and an approuer of that which he hath forbidden in his lawe and so he maketh God contrary vnto himselfe because he desireth god to punish him if hee doe that which god commaundeth and furthermore either hee hath a purpose to doe against gods commaundement or if hee sweare not in earnest he alleageth god for a witnes of a lie Whatsoeuer things we ought not to do god forbidding them the same neither ought any man also to sweare 4. Of possible thinges because hee that sweareth of vnpossible thinges either is mad or sweareth hypocritically and so sweareth of a lie namely hee sweareth that he will doe that which neither he will doe neither shall at all be done 5. Of thinges waightie necessarie profitable worthie of such and so great a confirmation and which require that confirmation by oath for the glorie of god and safetie of our neighbour Because hee that sweareth lightly sheweth no reuerence that he hath of god and he that doth easily sweare doth easilie also forsweare But the principal and chiefe cause of an oath ought to be the glory of god first and then the safetie and welfare as well priuate as publique of our neighbours Obiection Thinges to come are vncertaine therefore we must not sweare of thinges to come Aunswere Wee must not indeede sweare of the euent as which is not at all in our power but of our owne present will of doing either now or hereafter that which is iust and lawful and of the present and future binding of our selues to doe it whereof euerie man may and ought to be certaine And so sware Abraham Isaack Abimelech Dauid Ionathas Booz and others binding themselues to a future performance of certaine dueties 4 Whether all oathes are to be kept OATHES conceiued or made rightlie of thinges lawfull true certaine waightie and possible are to be kept For if once thou hast acknowledged and testified thy selfe to bee iustly bound to keepe thy promise and hast called god to record hereof when as afterwards thou wittingly and willingly breakest thine oath thou doest violate and breake a iust bonde and doest either accuse god the witnes and maintainer of this bond of vanity and lightnes or prouoke him to punish thee Psal 15.4.5 He that sweareth to his owne hinderance and changeth not shall neuer be moued Numb 30.3 Whosoeuer voweth a vowe vnto the Lord or sweareth an oath to bind himselfe by bond hee shall not breake his promise but shall doe according to all that proceedeth out of his mouth But oathes that are male of vnlawful thinges either by an error or by ignoraunce or through infirmitie or against the conscience it is sinne to keepe them And therefore such oaths are to be retracted and recalled least we adde thereby sinnes vnto sinnes For he that keepeth an oath made of vnlawful things heapeth sinne vpon sinne both in that he sware and so hath a wil to sinne and also in that he endeuoureth to do that which he sware and so confirmeth that will of sinning by an oath For what thinges GOD forbiddeth those thinges hee will not haue men either sworne or vnsworne to perfourme and what hee forbiddeth vs to will or promise or sweare so much the more doth hee forbidde vs to doe the same how much the more grieuous a thing it is to doe them than to will or promise them They therefore who keep that which they haue ill sworne heape sinne vnto sinne as did Herod putting Iohn Baptist to death by pretence of keeping his oath and likewise such as keepe monastical vowes whereby they haue sworne Idolatrie and impious single liuing Neither is this argument of any force An oath is necessarilie to be kept but they haue sworne these thinges therefore they must needes keepe them For the Maior is true of a lawfull oath But an oath which is made of a thing forbidden by god is not to be kept because it is not a lawful oath which also is amended and corrected by repenting thereof and by desisting from an euil purpose not by persisting therein or by perfourming it according as it is saide Eph. 4.28 Let him that stole steale no more and according to the example and doctrine of Dauid 1. Sam. 25. who sweareth that hee will destroy Nabal together with his familie Saying So and more also doe
inuocation of God who is the father of our Lord Iesus Christ 2. In regard of the tru knowledge of him that we may know him to be our father who through and for his Son the Mediatour hath adopted vs to be his Sons when otherwise we were his enemies I goe vnto my father and to your father and further also for his Sons sake he regenerateth vs by the holy Ghost and endoweth vs with all giftes and graces necessary 3. In regard of reuerence namely that in vs may bee stirred vp and raised true reuerence towardes him that seeing hee is our father wee therefore behaue our selues as becommeth Sons and be affected with such reuerence towards him as it becommeth children to be affected towards their father especially being adopted children and vnworthy of Gods blessinges and benefites 4. In regard of confidence that the same be raised in vs whereby we may be assured that we shal be heard For seeing god is our father euen so louing a father vnto vs that he hath giuen his onlie begotten Son for vs to death how then shal he not giue vs together with him all things necessary to our saluation 5. For a memorial of our creation Now God wil hear those only that so pray because in them he obtaineth the end of his blessings and benefites Obiection Jt is the part of a father to denie nothing vnto his children But God denieth many things to vs. Therefore he is not our father Aunswere It is the part of a father to deny nothing vnto his children that is which is necessary for them Christ willeth vs to call God our Father not my Father 1 Thereby to raise in vs a confidence and full perswasion that wee shall he heard For because the whole church doth with one consent pray vnto him he doth not reiect her but heareth her praiers according to this promise of our Lorde Where two or three are gathered together in my name there am I in the middest of them Obiection But oftentimes thou praiest at home the Church not beeing priuie thereunto Aunswere The Godly and the whole Church pray for themselues and all the members with an affection and desire Loue desire is an habitual qualitie of the soul remaining also when thou sleepest it is not a passion quickly fleeting or passing a way And this also maketh much for the engēdring of cōfidence in vs because as hath been saide God doth not reiect the whole Church 2 To admonish vs of mutual loue wherewith Christians being endued must pray one for another And therefore doth he by this worde in the very proeme entrance of the praier admonish vs of mutual loue wherwith we must be affected towards our neighbor 1 Because there is no true praying without the true loue of our neighbor neither can we be perswaded that God heareth vs. For if wee approch vnto God not accounting the sonnes of God for our breethren neither will hee then account vs for his sonnes 2 Because without the loue of our neighbour there is no true faith without faith there is no true praier For whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne The second part of the proeme is Which art in Heauen that is Heauenly Heauen heere signifieth the habitation of God and the holy Angels and blessed men And God is saide to dwell there because there God is more glorious than in this world doth also there immediatly shew and manifest himselfe Now the Lorde willeth vs to call him our Father which is in Heauen 1 Thereby to shewe the opposition and contrarietie of earthlie fathers and this Father that so we should thinke that God raigneth in Heauenly glory and Maiesty and is a Father not earthly but Heauenly euen he 1 Who sitteth in heauen 2 Who ruleth and gouerneth there by his prouidence the whole world by him created 3 Who is voide of all corruption and change 4 Who also doth there especiallie manifest himselfe before the Angels and doeth there shewe what a Father he is how good and how mightie and rich 2 To raise vp in vs a confidence that God heareth vs for if he be our Father and one that is endued with exceeding goodnesse which he especially manifesteth and declareth in Heauen Then will he also giue vs all thinges necessarie to saluation If this our Father be Lord in Heauen and so omnipotent whereby he is able to helpe vs then is hee able most easilie to giue vs those good things which we aske of him 3 To raise a reuerence of him in vs seeing this our father is so great a Lorde that is heauenly who raigneth euerie-where who is able to cast both bodie and soule into Hell fire let vs then reuerence such a Lorde and approch vnto him with exceeding submission both of minde and bodie 4 That we cal on him in feruencie of spirit 5 That the mind of him that worshippeth be lifted vp to heauenlie things 6 That heauenlie thinges bee desired 7 That the errour of Ethnikes might be met withall who thinke that they may adore and worship God in creatures 8 To admonish vs that wee are not to direct our praiers vnto a certaine place as in the olde Testament Let these things suffice for the first part of Christs praier Now followeth the second part of the praier namely the petition which compriseth six petitions THE FIRST PETITION HALLOWED be thy name This petition is set in the first place because it is the end and scope of all the other petitions or rather because the end of all thinges must be gods glorie Now the end is the first thing which is intended the last thing which is performed and exequuted like as also the end of the other petitions is first to be desired if we will desire the rest aright Mat 6.33 Seeke yee first the kingdome of God and his righteousnesse and all these thinges shall be ministred vnto you We are here to consider 1 What is called the name of God 2 What is Holie 3 What to hallowe or sanctifie 1 The name of God signifieth 1 God himselfe Ps 116.13 J will call vpon the name of the Lorde 2 Gods commandement charge his diuine will and authoritie Mat. 28.19 Baptise them in the name of the Father c. 3 The properties and woorkes of God in which signification the name of God is here taken to wit for his diuine woorkes and all those thinges which may be attributed vnto God 2 Holie signifieth 1 All the properties of God For al the vertues in God are Gods holinesse So the Angels call god Holie Isa 6 3. Holie Holie Holie Lord God of hosts 2 That holinesse which is in creatures that is their conformitie with God which is begunne in the godly and is perfect in the Angels 3 The ordeining or appointing of thinges to holie vses In this sense that is called holy which is destined to some holy vse as the Temple of Hierusalem The word of Hallowing is here taken in
From what euils he saueth vs 433 How he saueth 434 VVhom he saueth 437 Of Christ What is signified by the name of christ 437 What Christes vnction or annointing is 438 What his Prophetical function 444 VVhat his Priesthood 448 VVhat his kingdome 451 Of the communion of the faithful with Christ vvhat the Annointing of Christians is 452 In what sense christians are called prophets 456 vvhat is the Priesthoode of christians 456 vvhat is the kingdom of christians 458 Of Christ the Sonne of God How manie waies men are called sons 461 How christ is the son of God 463 vvhy christ is called the only begotten and first begotten sonne of God 464 Of Christs Diuinitie The sonne of God is a subsistent in the flesh borne of the virgin and before the flesh 467 The sonne of God Christ is a person reallie distinct from the Father and the holy Ghost 498 The Worde is equall consubstantial with the Father 500 503 Other rules whereby the obiections of the Arrians are dissolued 507 The principall arguments against the Diuinitie of the Sonne and the Holie Ghost with the answeres vnto them 509 Of Christ our Lord. In what sense christ is called Lord 514 For what causes he is our Lorde 515 Of christs conception by the holy ghost and birth of the Virgin Marie 518 The common place of the two natures in Christ vvhether there be two natures in christ our Mediatour 520 vvhether christ be one person or moe 525 vvhat maner of vnion this is of the two natures in christ and how made 529 A rule to bee obserued touching the proprieties of both natures in christ 536 A rule to bee obserued touching the proprieties of christ the Mediatour 544 vvhy it was necessary that two natures should bee vnited in the person or subsistence of the sonne of God 550 Of Christs humiliation that is of his Passion vvhat Christ suffered 554 According to which nature christ suffered 556 The causes impellent or motiues of christes Passion 55â— The final causes oâ— ends of his Passion 558 Of Christs death How christ is said to haue beene dead 561 vvhether it was requisite and necessary that christ should die 562 The fruit of christs death 564 His burial 566 His descension into hel 567 Of Christs glorification that is of his Resurrection vvhether christ rose againe 571 How christ rose 571 For what cause he rose 572 vvhat are the fruits of christes Resurrection 576 Of Christs Ascension into heauen vvhither christ ascended 580 How wherefore christ ascended into heauen 582 587 vvhat is the difference between christs Ascension and our 588 vvhat are the fruits of christs AscensioÌ„ 589 Of Christs sitting at the right hand of GOD. vvhat the right hand of God signifieth 591 vvhat is to sit at Gods right hand 591 vvhether christ did alwaies fitte at the right hand of God 595 vvhat are the fruites of christes sitting at the right hand of the father 597 Of Christs comming to iudgement vvhether there shal be any iudgement 599 vvhat the last iudgement is 601 vvho shal iudge 603 vvhence and whither christ shal come 604 Howe christ shall come to iudgement 605 vvhom christ shal iudge 605 vvhat shall be the senteÌ„ce executioÌ„ 606 For what cause that iudgemeÌ„t shal be 607 vvhen it shal be 608 vvherefore God woulde haue vs certaine of the last iudgement 608 For what causes God would not haue vs certain of the time of iudgement 609 For what cause GOD differreth that iudgement 609 Whether the last iudgement be to bee wished for 610 The third part of the Creede of the Holie Ghost the sanctifier What the name spirite signifieth 610 Who and what the holie Ghost is 611 What the office of the holy gost is 617 Of whom the holie Ghost is giuen and wherefore 621 To whom the holie Ghost is giuen 622 How he is giuen receiued 624 How the holie Ghost is reteined 625 Whether and how the holie ghost may be lost 625 wherefore the Holie Ghost is necessarie 626 Howe wee may knowe that the holie ghost dwelleth in vs. 627 Of the Church What the Church is 627 How many waies the Church is taken 629 What are the tokens and markes of the church 631 Why the church is called Holy Catholicke 633 In what the church differeth from the common weale 634 Whence ariseth the difference of the church from the rest of mankinde 635 Whether any one may be saued out of the church 636 Of Predestination Whether there be Predestination 636 What Predestinâ—tion is 641 What are the causes of Predestination or Election and of Reprobation 642 What are the effects of Predestination 644 Whether Predestination be vnchangeable 645 How far forth Predestination Election and Reprobation are known vnto vs. 645 Whether the elect be alwaies meÌ„bers of the church the reprobate neuer 646 Whether the elect may fall from the church and the reprobate abide alwaies in the church 648 What is the vse of this doctrine 649 Of the communion of Saints 649 Of the remission of sinnes What remission of sinnes is 651 Who giueth remission of sinnes 652 For what remission of sinnes is graunted 653 Whether remission of sinnes agreeth with Gods iustice 653 Whether remission of sinnes be freely giuen 654 To whom remission of sins is giuen and how 655 Of the Resurrection of the flesh What the Resurrection is 656 The Errours concerning the Resurrection 656 Whence it may appeare that the Resurrection shall certainely be 657 For what end the Resurrection shall be 659 By whom the Resurrection shal be 660 How the Resurrection shal be 660 When the Resurrection shal be 661 What bodies shal rise 661 Whether the soule be immortall 662 Of euerlasting life What euerlasting life is 670 VVho giueth euerlasting life 672 To whom euerlasting life is giuen 673 For what cause euerlasting life is giuen 673 VVhen how euerlasting life is giuen vnto vs 674 675 VVhether wee can bee assured in this life of euerlasting life 675 Of Justification VVhat iustice or righteousnes is in generall how manifold it is 677. 678 In what iustice differeth from iustification 679 VVhat is our iustice 680 How Christs satisfactioÌ„ is made our iustice and righteousnes 681 VVhy Christs satisfaction is made ours 683 VVhy Christs satisfaction is made ours by faith onely 684 Obiections against this doctrine of iustification aunswered 685 Of Sacraments VVhat sacraments are 694 VVhat are the ends of sacraments 697 In what sacraments differ from sacrifices 699 In what sacramentes agree with the word and in what they differ from it 700 How the sacraments of the old new Testament agree how they differ 702 VVhat the sacramentall vnion is 703 In what the thinges differ from the signes 704 VVhat phrases and formes of speaking of the sacraments are vsuall vnto the church and scripture 705 VVhat is the right and lawful vse of sacraments 705 VVhat the wicked receiue in the vse administration of the sacraments 706 How