Selected quad for the lemma: soul_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
soul_n	angel_n	body_n	heaven_n	5,423	5	5.4149	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A77265	A mustur roll of the evill angels embatteld against S, Michael. Being a collection, according to the order of time, (throughout all the centuries) of the chiefe of the ancient heretikes, with their tenets, such as were condemned by generall councels. Faithfully collected out of the most authentike authors. / By R.B. Gent.	Brathwaite, Richard, 1588?-1673.	1655 (1655)	Wing B4272; Thomason E1549_2; ESTC R209469	17,054	97

true body nor soule of a man and thus he fulfilled the mystery of our Redemption Philaster Brixiensis VII BASILIDES Ann. 124. He taught 1. That Christ did not suffer or was crucified but Simon of Cyrene Euseb Caesariensis lib. 4. Hist Eccl. Cap. 8. and Aug. lib. de haeresibus 2. He turnd away men from suffering Martyrdom affirming that it was no sin to deny Christ in the time of persecution 3. That the Angells made 365 Heavens and that these Heavens made the world Aug. and Philast de Haeresibus Niceph. lib. 4. cap. 2. VIII GNOSTICI circ Ann. 129. These were the most vile Hereticks in filthinesse of all others Epiph. l. 2. Tom. 2. haeres 26. their tenets were 1. That the soule was made of the substance of God and that bruit beasts had reason as man hath 2. That there were two Gods a good God and an evill God and that this evill God was the Creator of all things Philast lib. de haeresibus Niceph. lib. 4. cap. 2. lib. 2. cap. 24. IX CARPOCRATES Hee lived at the same time with the Ghosticks and is said to bee the Author of their Heresies Irenaeus lib. 1. cap. 24. He taught 1. That Christ was a meere man born of the seed of Joseph and not of the B. Virgin Mary That hee was a good man and that therfore after he was crucified his soule went up into Heaven but his body is still in the Grave Euseb Lib. 4. cap. 7. 2. He taught that the world was made by Angells 3. That there was no Resurrection Glossa in cap. 15. Leviti 4. He rejected the Old Testament as not Canonicall Scripture Aug. de heres Niceph. lib. 4. cap. 2. Philastrius and Tertul. X. CEDRON circ An. 144 taught 1. That there were two beginnings of al things a good God from whom came all good and an evill God from whom came all evill Hilarius li. 6 de Trinitate 2. That Christ was neither born of a woman nor had flesh neither did hee truely die and suffer but hee did seeme to die and suffer Aug. lib. de heres cap. 21 3. That the Law of Moses was evill and came from an evill beginning and this opinion was imbraced by his scholar Marcion as also by Manichaeus Tertul. ut supra Irenaeus lib. ● cap 28. XI VALENTINIUS circ An. 150. Affirmed 1. That Christ brought his flesh with him from Heaven and took no flesh of the B. Virgin but passed through her as water doth through a Conduit pipe Tertul. lib. contra Valentinianos 2 That ther are two beginnings of all things Profundum i. e. the deep and Silentium i. e. Silence these being married together had issue Understanding and Truth which brought forth three hundred Aeonas viz. thirty Ages or Angells and of the 130 Aeon were the Devill and others born who made the world Philast lib. de Haeresi bus XII MARCION Ann. Dom. 155. or thereabouts Was first a Stoick then a Christian he followed Basilides Cedron and Valentinius in their errors Policarpus called him Primo genitam Satanae i. e. The Devills eldest son 1. Hee Baptised them who died without Baptisme saying that S. Paul did will him so to doe 1 Cor. cap. 5 V. 29. Theophylact in com super locum 2. He taught that marriage was unlawfull and that it was a great sin to marry Hier. lib. 1 contra Jovinianum 1. That Cain the Sodomites and all wicked men were saved because they did meet Christ when hee descended into Hell but the Patriarches and Prophers are still in Hell for not meeting of Christ for they thought saith hee that Christ came to tempt them Iren. lib. 3 cap. 4. Ter. and alii XIII TATIANUS circ Ann. 173. Hee was of Syria and the Schollar of Justin Martyr and continued a good Christian as long as his master lived but after his death hee ran into many Heresies His Scholars were called Encratiae because of their continency 1. Hee held that Adam was damned 2. That it was not lawfull to eat the flesh of any creature for it came from the divell 3. He forbad marriage and drinking of Wine and said that the Divell was the Author of these also Irenaeus lib. 1 cap. 31. Clemens lib. 3. Strom. Epipha lib. 2. at the end of the third Tome XIV APPELLES about the yeare 178. 1. That Christ tooke not his flesh of his mother but of the elements the which hee restored to them again after his Resurrection and so hee went into Heaven without any body or flesh at all Euseb lib. 5. cap. 1● Aug. and Philast 2. He taught with other Heretikes that there were two Gods a good and a bad God But he did not teach that these two Gods were two beginnings but one beginning for the good God made the bad God and hee being bad made the world bad like himselfe Aug. de Haeresibus cap. 23. 3 He said that the Prophets did contradict one another in their Prophesies because some of them had the spirit of the good God and some of the bad Euseb lib. 5. hist Eccl. cap 12. 4 He put out these words i e Iohn cap. 4. ver 2 and 3. Quicunque spiritus profitetur Jesum Christum in carne venisse ex deo est c. i. e. Every spirit that Confesseth Iesus Christ to have come in flesh is of God c. For these words doe prove the incarnation of Christ and confute his first Heresie Niceph hist Eccl lib 4 cap 28. XV MONTANUS about the year 181. Affirmed 1 That he had the Holy Ghost and that the Apostles had not 2. He did baptise the dead 3. He did allow the first marriages but not the second and permitted them who were married to be seperated when they themselves would 4. He did take away Repentance affirming that sinners could never have their sins pardoned by Repentance 5. That the Apostles and Prophets understood not any thing that they had written but were Areptitii Euseb lib. 5. cap. 15. 18. Epipha Theodoretus Socrates Heretikes in the third Century XVI ELCHESITAE Anno Dom. 239 or ther abouts They had their name from Elohesae an Arabian they defended the same heresies with the Ebionites and said that it was no sin to deny Christ in the time of Persecution if then they did resolve in their Hearts that they would be constant in the faith of Christ for God say they doth regard more the Heart then the tongue Euseb Hist Eccl. lib. 6. cap. 18. XVII MELCHISEDECHIANI Ann. 240. They thought that Melchisedech was not a meer man but a Power of God greater then Christ because that Christ was of the order of Melchisedech Psa 110 ver 4 Aug lib de haeresibus et Epiph Haeres 55. XVIII NOVATUS and Novatiani circ Ann 250 They were also called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e Puritanes for they thought themselves purer then others 1. They would not receive any into the Church after they had denyed Christ albeit they did repent Cyprian

no where but in Affrick and that there and no where else Baptism was rightly administred 2. That the Sacraments were holy and Effectuall when they were received at the hands of holy men and not otherwise 3. That their Sect was without Sin And 4. That they were not to have any Societie with them who had fallen into any Sin Aug Optatus Milevitanus XXV MACEDONIUS and the Macedo nians Anno. 359 or therabout They said that the Son of God was like the Father in Substance and in all things but that the Moly Ghost was unlike unto the father and Son and a meer Creature yet they preferrd him before the Angells Russinus lib. 1 hist Eccl cap 25 Aug lib de Haeresibus cap 5 2 XXVI APOLLINARIUS and his followers Anno. 377. or there abouts 1. That Christ in his Incarnation did assume a body without a Soule or if he had a soule yet it was no reasonable soule but that God the word was instead of it 2. Hee brought that body with him from Heaven and made it of the same substance with his divine nature and that this body when it came on the earth was passible visible and mortall 3. That sin is a part of mans essence and that therefore if Christ had beene a perfect man hee must needs have beene a sinner Gregor Nazianz in Epist ad Nectarium Basil Epist 72. Hieron in Catalogo Socrates Sozomenus Ruffinus XXVII PRISCILLIANUS and his followers Anno 388. or therabouts Was a Spaniard he gathered many Heresies out of the writings of those Heretikes who were before his time 1. He and they were of opinion with Origen that the soules sin'd before their infusion into the bodies 2. They thought with Tatianus and the Encratitae that the eating of flesh was an uncleane thing 3. With the Gnosticks and the Manichies they made two Gods one good and another bad ut supra 4. They confounded the Persons of the B. Trinity with Sabellinus 5. They were of opinion with Bardesanes that every man had his fatall Star and that our bodies were compounded according to the operation of the twelve signes in the Zodiack 6. They thought it no sinne to swear and forswear rather then to reveale the things they taught Aug. de Haeresibus Hieron in Chronico XXVIII JOVINIUS the Jovinians An. 395. or neere about He was a Monke at Rome contemporary with S. Jerom hee and his tribe defended 1. That it was lawfull for all men to eate all meates at all times albeit they were forbidden by the ecclesiasticall Lawes Aug. lib. de Haeresibus ad quod vult deum cap. 82. 2. That in this life there is no disparity of merit nor any disparity of glory in the life to come but that all should bee rewarded alike in Heaven 3. That they who have a full and perfect faith when they are regenerate by Baptisme cannot sin any more after Baptisme 4. That the B. Virgin was carnally known of her husband Joseph after the birth of Christ Hieron libris duobus contra Jovinianum Aug. ut supra Aquinas in tractatu contra detrahent Religion cap. 6. Sabellicus lib. 9. Septim Eneadis XXIX ANTHROPOMORPHITAE They lived set abroach their Heresies at the same time with Jovinian 1. They thought that God had the forme and members of a man because that God is said to have made man after his own image likeness Gen. 1.26 2. They seperated themselves from the Church because Userers and wicked men were suffered therein Theodoretus lib. 4. Cap 10 Aug. ad quod vult deum Epiph. Niceph. HEIVIDIUS and the Helvidians Anno. 395. or near abouts These were at the same time with the Anthropomorphites and were called Antidicomaritae because they opposed the perpetuall Virginity of the B. Virgin Mary the Mother of God for they affirmed that shee had children by Joseph her Husband after the birth of Christ and this they would prove Mat 1 ver vult wher Christ is called the first born Son of the B. Virgin and Iohn 2 12 and cap 7 3 Epiph lib 3 Tom 2 Hieron cont Helv Aug Her 84. Heretikes in the fift Century PELAGIUS and the Pelagians Anno. Dom. 405. He was borne in Great Britany He with his Scholars held these Assertions 1. That the nature of Man after the fall of our first Parents was Good and not corrupted Especially the soule of Man and therfore Infants were born without Sin and needed no Baptisme but yet it was fit that they should be baptized that they might be honored with the Sacrament of Adoption 2. That the lust of the flesh was no Sin but a Natural good and that sin was not propagated unto mankind by generation but by innitiation only neither could Infants Sin for all Sin is voluntary 3. That Sin is not the Death but the condition of Nature Adam then should have died if he had never sinned 4. That all men have free will by nature not onely in all naturall and morall but in all spirituall things 5. That the beginning of our salvation is in our selves and we may attaine grace of regeneration in Christ by our naturall faculties if we aske seeke and knock for the same 6. That Faith is a Generall worke of nature and no speciall work of Grace and perseverance in Faith is in our selves 7. That the love of God and of our neighbour and all our Christian Virtues are of our selves and not of God 8. That the prayers of the Church are not necessary seeing whatsoever we pray for we may obtain without Prayer for God doth give his grace unto every one according to his own merits Lastly that men neede not commit any sin except they will themselves Aug. lib. de Haeresib ad quod-vult Deum cap 8 alibi in libris Epist suis cont Pelagianos Hieron in Epist ad Ctesiphont m. Prosp de Ingratis Hilarius Arelatensis Maxentius cont Hormisdam XXII PREDESTINATI Ann. 414. or thereabouts They had this name given them because in their disputations upon predestination this was their assertion viz. good works will doe men no good at all if by God they be predestinated unto death and damnation neither will bad workes hurt wicked men if by God they bee predestinated unto eternall life and Salvation By which this their assertion they did hinder many men from doing good works and did stir up wicked men to heap sin upon sin Sigibertus in his Chronicles Vincentius lib. 19 cap. 5 Luceburgensis XXXIII NESTORIUS and his Disciples about the yeare 427. NESTORIUS Archbishop of Constantinople and Anastatius his Priest Theodorus Mopsuetanus and the rest of that most wicked sect did teach with Cerinthus that the B. Virgin bare in her womb a meere man who had onely the nature of a man and was a man in his person and that therefore the said Virgin was not the mother of God but the Mother of Christ Neither was the Nativity Passion Resurrection or Assension of Christ more then humane

A MUSTUR ROLL of the evill Angels embatteld against S Michael Being a Collection according to the order of Time throughout all the Centuries of the chiefe of the Ancient Heretikes with their Tenets such as were condemned by Generall Councels Faithfully collected out of the most Authentike Authors By R. B. Gent. Sil. Ital. Heu primaec scelerum causa Mortalitus aegris Naturam nescire Deum London Printed for WILLIAM SHEERS and are to be sold at his shop in S. Pauls Churchyard at the sign of the Bible 1655. The Errata PAg. 15. lin 21. read admired 50.2 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 52.2 Ecbert 55.16 this name Eliel after c. 60.10 Venus 113.7 tristitiam 121.7 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 145.9 it is 171.7 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 178.10 Timaeus 194.2 it self 197.6 Womens names in the Title of the 2d Book 203. ult which the Aegyptians worship as a God in the Sun 227.4 a measure or rule To Sir I. P. Baronet SIR I Send you heere an Assize Booke or rather a Treatise of Poysons to peruse which I had not given you the trouble had not your own commands obliged mee to it for what my memory faild me of in our last discourse upon this subject of Heretikes I have to comply with your desires turn'd over those few Treasuries of Common places wherewith my reading hath furnished mee And now you may behold the Locusts creeping out of the bottomlesse Pit in their orders and heare all their severall tones for I have according to the order of time given you the names of all the chiefe Heretikes with their positions throughout all the Centuries Here are none but such as were condemned by Generall or Oeconomicall Councels Nor is there any Author quoted that is not of a venerable name I might have inserted more of this deluded gang but when one followed another allready condemned and lick't but up his vomit I have omitted him for there is a kind of transmigration of Heresie which needs no proofe to such as live in this Age wherein her womb is more fruitfull of monsters then Affrick This Bedroll I submit to your judgement which is abundantly able to supply any defect you may finde therin Capitall Heretikes in the severall Centuries Heretikes in the first Century I. SIMON MAGUS An. Dom. 55. or thereabouts HE was a Samaritan borne Of him and his Sorcery and the great opinion the Samaritans had of him we read Act. cap. 8. verse 9. c. He was the Head and beginner of Heresie Euseb lib. 2. cap. 13. He affirmed 1. That he himselfe was the Father Son and Holy Ghost and that he was worshipped of all people by divers names 2. That Christ did suffer no hurt of the Jewes for hee was Christ S. Jeronym contra Lucifer 3. That any man might lie with any woman for this was no sin 4. That the world was made by Angels and that an Angel redeemed Mankind 5. Hee denied the Resurrection 6. He thought that the gifts of the Holy Ghost might bee bought with money Act. ch 8. vers 18. And therefore that sinne of him is called Simony II. CHRINTHUS about the yeere 69. He is said to be a Jew by birth he lived at the same time with Saint John the Evangelist Irenaeus lib. 3. cap. 3. He taught 1. That Jesus our Saviour had for his Parents Joseph and Mary and that at his Baptisme Christ descended on him who saith he is called the holy Ghost by whom hee did all his Miracles when Josus was to bee crucified of the Jewes then Christ left him and went up againe into Heaven Epiphanius Heresi 28. Hist Magdeburgens Cent. 1 lib. 2. cap. 5. 2 That Christs Kingdom after the Resurrection should be an earthly Kingdome and that men then should live in all fleshly lusts and pleasures together for a thousand yeares Euseb hist Eccles lib. 3 Eccl. Hist cap. 14. 3 He denyed the divine nature of Christ and said that he had onely a humane Nature and that he was not yet risen from the dead but he should rise hereafter Jrenaeus ut Supra 4 He affirmed that the old Law and all the old commandements and precepts belonging unto it were to be kept together with the new Law or Gospell and that therfore Circumcision was necessary for every one that would be saved Philastrius lib. de haeresibus III. EBION An. 80. or thereabouts He taught with Cerinthus 1. That Christ was but a meere Man Hilarius lib. 1. de Trinitate And therfore the Gospell of Saint John was written to confute him Hieronymus lib. de Eccles Scriptoribus 2. That when Iesus was thirtie yeares old there descended on him and dwelt in him another Person who was called Christ and thus Jesus and Christ dwelt and were united together Ireneus lib. 1. Cap. 25. and 26. Epiph. heres 30. Niceph. hist Eccl. lib. 3. cap. 13. 3 He agreed with Cerinthus in the rest of the Heresies touching Circumcision and keeping all the Law of Moses Epiph. Ireneus Niceph. ut supra IV. MENANDER Anno 81. or therabouts He was the schollar of Simon Magus and lived about the same time with Ebion and Cerinthus He held 1 That the world was made of Angells and that these Angells could be overcom by no meanes but by Art magick 2. He denyed Christ to be a true Man and 3 Affirmed himselfe to be the saviour of the world and that he came from Heaven to save mankind and that all who would be saved must be baptized in his Name Euseb lib. 3. cap 26. August lib. de haeresibus Niceph. lib. 3. cap 12. V NICHOLAS of Antiochia He was one of the seaven first Deacons Act. cap. 6. Ver. 5. He having a fair wife and being accused of being jealous of her gave leave to any that would lie with her Clemens Alexandr lib. 3. Strom. Others taking occasion of this fact of his thought it Lawfull for any man to have the company of any woman whom they themselves would like Against these men Saint John doth write in the Apocalips cap. 2 ver 6 Epiphanius saith that they taught Venery to be so necessary that those men who used it not every week on Fridaye could not bee saved Epiph. lib. 2 Tom. 2. heres 25. Of these Nicholaites S. August and Philastrius doe speake lib. de Haeresibus S. Jerom in epist de Fabiano lapso Niceph. lib. 3. Eccles. hist cap. 15. The English notes upon the prementioned 2. cap. of the Apoc. in the Remish Testament saith that this Nicholas was not onely thought to have taught community of wives but also that it was lawfull to eat of meates offered to Idols Idolothita Heretikes in the second Century VI. SATURNINU circ An. Dom. 1●8 He was borne at Antioch He held many opinions of Menander and Simon Magus 1. That the World was made of seven Angells without the knowledge of God the father Tertul. de Heresibus 2. That Christ was but the shaddow of a man for he had neither the