Selected quad for the lemma: son_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
son_n lord_n sir_n thomas_n 32,077 5 8.8918 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A29745 A brief remonstrance of the grand grievances and oppressions suffered by Sir William Courten and Sir Paul Pyndar, knts., deceased as also by their heirs, executors, administrators, and creditors : humbly represented to both Houses of Parliament, prorogued to 21 October 1680 : faithfully collected out of several courts of record, orders of counsel, and treaties of peace and common alliance : with several remarks thereupon for the improvement of naviagation, trade, and commerce / by John Brown. Brown, John, of London. 1680 (1680) Wing B5025; ESTC R27230 34,787 30

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

English Ships Sailing directly from several Ports of England for Antwerp were stopt by a Man of War lying over against the Fort at Lillo some of them being Laden with New-Castle Coles although the Masters offered to pay what Tolls or Customs were reasonable but all would not serve their turn the Ships were forced to go back again to Flushing or Roterdam and there to unlade and pay the Duties of those Ports besides all petty Charges and then constrained to lade them in small Dutch-Roats and to pay them Fraight at their own Prices besides other Charges at Lillo and also at the Spanish Fort of St. Mary to the intolerable Expence and Burthen of His Majesties Subjects although the River ought to be free by the very Words of Stipulation in the said Treaty Marine for all English Ships of any Burthen being one of the best Navigable Rivers in the World A Ship Laden with 400 Tunn of Goods being passable to the Port of Antwerp at low Water In this River the Dutch Seamen were lately so bold to Attaque a Vessel wherein Sir Lyonel Ienkins comming from Nimegen was Imbarqued for England from the City of Antwerp presuming to demand Custom for Goods therein as of all other Ships passing through that Navigable River So that all the Material Demands in Agitation at Cologne Anno 1673 viz the regulation of Trade in the East-Indies settling the Freedom of Navigation in Europe the Arrears for Fishing upon the English Coast and ascertaining a settled Revenue to the Crown out of every Buss and Dogger Boat for that liberty hereafter and even the Reparations for Courtens Debts and Damages remains in sttatu quo unsettled The States of Holland falsly pretending that their Friends in the House of Commons would not have those points insisted upon by the King In the Year 1677. Several of the Proprietors Creditors and others Interested made fresh Applications to the King and Councel to be Heard and Relieved in the Premises and their former Complaints Whereupon these two following Orders of the Councel-Table were made At the Court at White-Hall the 24 th of Iuly 1677. By the Kings Most Excellent Majesty and the Lords of His Majesties Most Honourable Privy Council UPon the humble Petition of Thomas Kynaston Merchant George Porter Esq Son and Heir of Endimion Porter Esq and Thomas Tounsend Esq Adventurers in the joynt stock with Sir William Courten to the East-Indies George Carew Esq Administrator of Sir William Courten and Sir Paul Pindar Charles Earl of Shrewsbury Sir Thomas Meers Rt. Executor of Sir Erasmus de la Fountain Rt. deceased George Cole Thomas Coppin and Charles Whitaker Esqs on the behalf of themselves and others with many Orphans and Widows Creditors of Sir William Courten and his Son and Sir Edward Littleton and the late Earl of Bridgewater deceased Praying that they may be heard at this Board upon their former Petition setting forth their great losses and damages sustained by the East-India Company of the Netherlands by reason of their violent Depredation upon the two Ships the Bona Esperanza and the Henry Bonadventura His Majesty was pleased to appoint Wednesday the 10 th of October next for hearing the Petitioners by themselves or their Council Learned upon the matter of their said former Petition At which time all Parties concerned are to give their attendance JOHN NICHOLAS At the Court at White-Hall the 24 th of Iuly 1677. By the Kings Most Excellent Majesty and the Lords of His Majesties Most Honourable Privy Council UPon the Humble Petition of George Carew Esq Administrator of the Goods and Chattels of Sir William Courten and Sir Paul Pyndar Sir Thomas Meers Kt. Executor of Sir Erasmus de la Fountain Thomas Coppin Gilberd Crouch and William Hinton Esq Valentina Bazilla Loyd Executrix of Sir Peter Vanloar and Elizabeth Bartlet Widows Mark Fletcher and Thomas Carter Merchants on the behalf of themselves and many Hundreds of His Majesties Subjects of England herein concerned setting forth the Sinister Practices used by Peter Boudaen of Middleburgh Merchant Nephew and sole Executor of Sir Peter Courten in Possessing himself of the Estate Real and Personal of the said Sir Peter avoiding to come to any Accompt for the same and obstructing the ordinary Court of Iustice during his life as his Sons and Heirs have since done whereby the due Administration of Iustice hath been often denied and the Iudicial Acts and Decrees of the Prerogative Court and High Court of Chancery in this Kingdom slighted and contemn'd in the ordinary Courts of Iudicature in Holland and Zealand Whereby Order from the States in the year 1676. Iustice was positively denied the Petitioners to the great Oppression of them and of many Orphans and Widows claiming the Effects and Sir William Courten's Estate and his Sons as also of Mr. John Moncy's and Sir Paul Pyndars gotten into the Hands of the said Boudaen Pergens and others Inhabitants of Amsterdam and Middelburgh to the value of two hundred and fifty thousand pounds And therefore praying that speedy satisfaction may be required from the Embassadour Extraordinary of the States General or that Commissioners on either side may be forthwith named to inspect the Accompts between both Parties and determine the same according to Right His Majesty was pleased to appoint Wednesday the 10 th of October next for hearing the Petitioners at the Board concerning this business at which time the Parties concerned are to give their attendance and bring their Council Learned if they please JOHN NICHOLAS AFter two of the Petitioners with a Friend of theirs Addressed themselves to Mons. Van Beuninghen the Dutch Ambassador at his House in Westminster with Authentique Copies of the said Orders under the Seal of the Office Desiring that his Excellency would take notice thereof and make any defence at the Council Table by his Advocates if he pleased Whereupon after he and his Secretary had perused the same his Excellency toar the Orders in Pieces and gave the Petitioners very Menacing Language and so parted out of his Anti-chamber Then some of the Creditors who thought they had done a kindness to the Ambassador by sending him timely notice caused the said Order of Councel to be Printed with the Embssadors Deportment underneath and sent him the same in a Letter who thereupon gave in a long Memorial on the 12th of September 1677. in French to the King Complaining that three Persons had highly Affronted him by leaving a Citation with him to appear before the Council Table on the 10th of October following Alledging in his said Memorial that it was a proceeding of a very high nature the most Injurious violation of the Respects to the most Sacred Laws of Nations and prayed Reparations proportionable to the Grandeur of so outragious and publique Offence And moreover that His Majesty would oblige the Interested Persons to wave all their said demands as Mortified and Extinguished pretences It was a grand Mistake in his Excellency after all his Rodomontadoes