is no accepter of persons for as unto the Lord he that is greater is as the lesser and he that doth govern as the servant but with men there is a difference of persons viz. The King and under him Dukes Counts Barons Vavasors and Knights Counts so called because they take their name from the County or from the word society who may also be tearmed Consull of Counselling For Kings do associate such men unto them to govern the people of God ordaining them into great honour power and name when they do gird them with swords that is to say ringis gladiorum with the Belts of their swords ringis so called * quasi renes girans circundans for that they compasse the Reins of such that they may keep them from incest and luxury because luxurious and incestuous persons are abominable unto God upon this cause were the stations and encamping of Arms called in the ancient language of Rome casâ—â—â— even of the word Castrare to geld since that they ought to be castrata vel castra In that place ought a good Generall to foresee that Venus delights be as it were gâ—lded and 〈◊〉 off from the Army vide Sir John Ferne his Book intituled The glory of generosity The sword also doth signifie the defence of the Kingdome and Countrey There be other Potents under the King which are called Barons that is to say robor belli the strength of Warre There be others which are called Vavasors viri magnâ— dignitatis â—en of great dignity for Vavasor cannot better be said to be any thing than Vas sortitum ad valetudinem a vessel chosen for valour or as men standing with their Generall ad valuas Regni and this is enough if not too much in generall spoken of the Nobility of England now follow I a more particular discourse of them according to their severall degrees The Prince THe Kings eldest Sonne and Heir apparant is stiled Prince Quasi primum locum capiens post Regem the first next the King To him it was permitted by the Statute of 24. Hen. 8. cap. 13. To wear Silk of the colour of Purple and Cloth of Gold of Tissue in his apparell or upon his horse but by another Statute made in the fourth yeer of King James Chap. 25. all Laws and Statutes concerning apparell are taken away And by the Statute of 34. Hen. 3. cap. 2. Taking shall not be from henceforth made by others then by the Purveyors of the King of the Queen and of the Prince their eldest Sonne and that if any other mans Purveyor make such taking it shall be done of them as those which do without warrant and the deed judged as a thing done against the peace and the Law of the Land and such as do not in manner aforesaid shall be duly punished To eschew maintenance and nourish peace and amity in all parts of the Realm many Statutes have been made in the Raign of Hen. 4. prohibiting the giving of signes or Liveries to any but to their menialls Neverthelesse by the Statute of 2. Hen. 4. cap. 21. It is provided that the Prince may give his honourable Liveries of signes to the Lords or to his meniall Gentlemen and that the said Lords may wear the same as they wear the Kings Livery and that the menialls of the Prince may also wear the same as the Kings menialls But afterwards by occasion of divers other Statutes of latter times made by sundry other Kings for the suppressing of that enormity of maintenance and of the generall words in them that priviledge of the Prince was abridged or rather taken away therefore the Statute of 12. Ed. 4. was made as followeth Item Our Soveraign Lord the King considering that the Prince the first begotten Sonne to the King of England hath been at their liberties to give their Liveries and signes at their pleasure and that divers Statutes against givers and takers of Liveries and signes as well in the time of his noble raign as in the time of his progenitors and predecessors hath been made and that by force of the said Statutes his dear beloved first begotten sonne Edward Prince of Wales Duke of Cornwall and Earl of Chester is as well as any other person restrained to give any such Liveries and signes as our Soveraign Lord the King willing that his first begotten sonne the Prince be at his liberty in receiving any person and giving his signes and Liveries in as large form as any Prince first begotten sonne of any of his Noble Progenitors and predecessors in time pasâ— have been hath ordained and established by authority of the said Parliament that the Prince shall be at his liberty to retain and give his honourable Livery and signe at his pleasure and that the persons so â—â—â—â—ined or to whom such Liveries or signes be or shall be given may be retained and received and wear the same Livery and sign without trouble impediment or impeachment pain contempt or forfeiture or any penalty contained in any of the said Statutes or in any thing in them comprised notwithstanding Nor that the said Statutes in any manner shall extend to any retaining to be made by the said Prince in giving taking or retaining of any Livery or signe of the Prince By the Statute 21. Hen. 8. cap 13. The Prince may retain as many Chaplains as he will though all others of the Nobility other then those of the Kings bloud be restrained to a certain number and they or any of them may purchase licence or dispensation and take receive and keep personages or benefices with cure of souls By order of the common Law a King might have a reasonable ayde of all his Tenents as well of those that did hold of his highnesse by Knights service as of those that did hold their Land in soccage That is to make his eldest Sonne But first note that the ayde is not to be recovered before the Sonne be of the age of 15. yeers or before the Daughter accomplish the age of 7. yeers Fitz Harbert Nat. brevium Knight and for the Marriage of his eldest Daughter and the summe of money was not in certainty but at the Kings pleasure till by the Statute made in the 25. of Ed. 3. cap. 11. by which is enacted as followeth Item It is assented that reasonable aid to make the Kings first Sonne Knight and to marry his eldest Daughter shall be demanded and levied after the forme of the Stature thereof made and not in other manner that is to say of every Knights Fee holden of the King without mean rate 20s and no more and of every 20â— of Land holden of the King without mean in soccagâ— 20s and no more and so rata pro rata of the Lands in soccage And for Lands of the â—enure of Chevalry according to the quantity of the Fee By another Statute made in the said 25. yeer of Ed. 3. cap. 2. amongst other things it is declared that to compasse
King of England as also to our selfe by our Letters Patents doe grant and give licence for us and our heires so much as in us lyeth to the said Edmond to dispose and give all his Manours Lands Tenements and Knights fees with their appurtenances and Advowsons of Churches Abbies and Priories and Hospitalls which he holdeth of us in chiefe to whom he pleaseth To have and to hold to him and his heires for us and our heires by the service thereof for ever By which Grant the said Edmond gave all his Lands and Tenements to one William sonne of John Deyncourt and to his heires of his body comming And the said Edmond dyed the last yeere of Edward the second and the said William in the time of Edward the third was summoned among other Barons to the Parliament by vertue of the same gift untill his death which was Anno 3. E. 3. It appeareth by divers offices in the time of King Edward the third that John Handlow in the right of Maud his wife was seized of the Mannour of Holgate Acton Burnell c. for terme of her life remainder to Nicolas Handlow alias Burnell sonne to the said Maud and John by a fine in the Court levied and that John Lovell was next heire of the said Maud and her first-borne sonne by her first husband and afterwards the said Nicolas was summoned among other Lords to the Parliament by reason of the fine aforesaid and not the said John Lovel who was next heire Edward Burnell Baron of Holgate Philip Burnell Baron of Holgate Maud Burnell heire to her brother John Lovell the first husband John Lord Lovell Iohn Lord Lovell John Handlow second husband Nicolas Handlow Baron of Holgate Hugh Handlow alias Burnell Baron of Holgate Thomas de Beauchamp the elder Earle of Warwick by a fine levied 18. E. 3. entailed the Mannour and Castle of Warwicke with divers other possessions to himselfe for terme of his life the remainder whereof to Guy his eldest sonne and to the heires males of his body issuing for want of such heires the remainder to come to Thomes Beauchamp brother to the foresaid Guy and to his heires males of his body issuing c. And afterwards the said Gâ—y died without heires male of his body leaving two daughters and heires living afterward the said Earle dyed and the said Thomas the sonne entred into the Castle and Mannour aforesaid with other the premisses and was Earle of Warwick by reason of the entaile aforesaid notwithstanding that Katharine daughter of Guy and next heire to the said Thomas the elder was living 30. yeers after his death Thomas Beauchampe Earl of Warwick Guy de Beauchampe first son obiit ante patrem 30. E. 3 Katharine lived in 21. R. 2 Elizabeth Tho. de Beauchampe Earle of Warwicke by reason of the entail obiit anno 1. H. 4 Rich. Beauchamp Earl of Warwick obiit 17. H. 6 William Beauchamp de Beauchamp L. of Aberganey obiit 12. H. 4 Richard de Beauchamp Earl of Warwicke obiit 9. H. 5 Richard Earle of Arundell by a fine 21. E. 3. entailed the Castle Towne and Mannor of Arundell with other Lands to him and to his heires Males begotten of the body of Ellenor his wife By vertue of which entaile John Lord Matrovers Earle of Arundell after the decease of Thomas then Earle which died without heire Male although the sisters of the said Thomas possessed divers Lands and honors of the which the said Thomas died seised in Fee simple was Earle of Arundell Richard Earle of Arundell Richard Earle of Arundell obiit anno 21. R. 2 Thomas Earle of Arundell obiit anno 3. H. 5 Elizabeth married to Tho. Mowbray Duke Norfolk Jane Lady of Abergany Married to Lewthall John Arundell Knight Lord Matrovers John Arund Lord Matrovers obiit 6. H. 4 Io. Arund L. Matrovers obiit 9. H. 5 Io. E of Arun. by reason of the entail Thomas Lord Barkley was seised in his demesne as of fee of the Castle of Barkley and Mannour c. and a fine levied in the Kings Court 23 E. 3. of the aforesaid Castle Mannour c. to him for terme of his life remainder to Morrice his sonne and to the heires males of his body issuing with other remainders as aforesaid the which said Morrice had issue Thomas Lord Barkley and Iames Barkley Knight which Iames dyed in the life of his brother leaving Iames his sonne and heire living After the said Thomas Lord Barkley died Anno 5. H. 5. leaving Elizabeth his daughter and heir married to Richard Earle of Warwick after whose death Iames his Nephew on the brothers side entred into the Lands Castles and rem ' aforesaid by virtue of the entaile and was summoned among the Barons to the Parliament as Baron of Barkley 9. H. 5. which Elizabeth died in 1. H. 6. Tho. Lord Barkley Morrice Lo Barkley Tho. Lord Barkley Eliz. married to Rich. Earle of Warwick Sir Ia. Barkley died before his brother Iames Lo. Barkley by reason of the entaile Thomas Lord De la ware died seised in his demesne as of fee taile to himselfe and to the heires males of his body issuing by reason of a fine levied in the time of his ancestors of the Barony De la ware with divers other lands in other counties and died 5. H. 6. without heires of his body and Reignold West Knight of the halfe blood was next heire by reason of the entaile aforesaid and was summoned to the Parliament by the name of Reignold Lord De la ware Knight although Iohn Griffith was heire generall of the aforesaid Thomas De la ware being of the whole blood as appeareth by the genealogie ensuing Iohn Lord Delaware son of Roger. Iohn Lord Delaware Roger Lord Delaware Elisabeth daughter to Adam L. Wels. Iohn Lord De la ware died without issue Thomas Lord Dela ware died without issue Elisabeth daughter to the Lord Mowbray hâ—s second wife Iohn Griffin heire generall to the Lord Delaware Sir Reignold West Lord De la ware by the entail Katharine married to Nicolas Latimer Katharine married to Griffin Iohan married to Tho West Knight John de Vere Earle of Oxford seised in his demesne as of Fee taile to him and his heires Males of his body issuing of the honour and county of Oxford with divers other Lands Anno 18. H. 8. died without heires of his body and his three sisters were his next heires generall but Iohn de Vere his next heire Male as appeareth was Earle of Oxford by reason of the said entaile and none of the three sisters obtained Dignity Richard de Vere Earle of Oxford died 4. H. 5. Iohn de Vere Earle of Oxford deed 1. E. 4. John de Vere Earle of Oxford died without issue 4. H. 8. George de vere Knight Iohn de Vere Earl of Oxfo died without issue 18. H. 8. Eliz. married to Sir Antho. Wingfield Knight Ursula married to Edm. Knightley Esq Dorothy married to Nevill Sir Robert de Vere
Kt Iohn de Vere Iohn de vere Earle of Oxford by vertue of the entaile Iohn de Vere William Lord Pagâ—t of Bewdesert was seised in his demesn as of fee of the Baronies of Langden and Hawood and of and in the Mannours of Bewdesert Landen c. And being so seised by fine quinto Mariae entailed the Baronies and Mannours aforesaid to him and his heires males of his body issuing And afterward Anno 5. Eliz. died leaving Henry his sonne next heire male Which Henry entred into the Baronies and land aforesaid by vertue of the foresaid fine and died thereof seised 11. Eliz. leaving Elizabeth his onely daughter and heire After whose death Thomas Paget brother and heire male of the said Henry entred into the Baronies and Mannours aforesaid and was summoned to the Parliament by virtue of the aforesaid fine William Lord Paget of Bewdesert died anno 5. Eliz. Henry Lord Paget dies An. 11. Eliz. Elizabeth his daughter and heire Thomas Lord Paget by force of the entaile after the death of his brother Robert Lord Ogle entred into the Barony of Bothal and Ogle with divers other Mannors and Lands in the County of Northumberland by conveiance which was to himselfe for terme of his life the remainder to the heires males of his body begotten and he took to his wife Dorothy Witherington by whom he had issue Robert Ogle his eldest sonne and Margery his daughter married Gregory Ogle of Chippington And the said Robert the father after the death of the said Dorothy his wife took to his second wife Ioane Ratcliffe by whom he had issue Cutbert his second sonne and after died After whose death Robert the sonne was Lord Ogle from whom the same descended to Cutbert being brother of the halfe blood by vertue of the said entaile and not to the said Margery nor unto her heires being of the whole blood unto the said Robert the sonne Robert Ogle Lord Ogle Dorothy daughter of Henry Withrington first wife Robert Ogle L. Ogle died without issue Margery maried to Ogle of Chippington Cuthbert Ogle of Chippington Joan the daughter of Cuthbert Ratcliff Kni. the second wife Cuthbert Ogle L. Ogle died Margery Ogle married Robert Witherington Thomas Ogle Moreover concerning the second objection it is very â—rue that many ancient Mannours which were anciently holden by Barony as the head or parcell of a Barony are now in the hands of Gentlemen meane and un-noble by blood who neither doe nor may claime any Nobility or honour thereby But the reason that some former gifts made by the Kings Majesties progenitouâ—s the supreme Soveraignes of this Realme to such as they honoured in augmentation and support of their honour and by honourable services should thus come to the hands of mean personages are twofold First for that such Mannours have been alieued by licence unto such persons before spoken whom such possessions alone cannot make noble Secondly and that was usually such Mannours as were holden by Barony have upon divers eâ—cheasons and occasions come to the Crowne by way of revertor or eschete or forfeit by meanes whereof the ancient tenures derived from the Crowne by reason of those lands so comming again to the Crown were extinct and after the said lands were given or conveyed to others reserving other services than those which at the first were due for the same so that it was no marvaile to see that some Mannours anciently holden by Barony or other honourable service should now bee holden in soccage or by other triviall or meane tenure As to that which was thirdly objected that some ancient Barons there are which have aliened and sold away those Castles and Mannours of the which they have and doe beare the name and dignity and yet neverthelesse themselves doe still retaine and keep lawfully their estate dignity and degree of a Barâ—â— and have been and are called to the Parliament such alienation notwithstanding To this I answer That it is true but it proveth nothing against the former resolution And therefore for better satisfaction of this observation it is to be considered that such Barons either be originally Barons by writ or Barons by tenure Barons by writ in this respect now in hand are of two kindes For either in such writ whereby they or their Ancestors were at first summoned they were named onely by their owne names or else there was addition given them of the principall place of their aboad which was done either for distinction sake to sever them from some honourable person of the same surname or else to give them such honourable title by addition of the place which place notwithstanding was not holden by Barony And therefore if such a Baron doe alien away that place which anciently was his seat he may neverthelesse retain his honourable title in respect had of such a place But if a Baron by tenure doe alien away the honourarable Castle or Mannour holden by Barony unto a mean person not capable of honour and that by sufficient licence so to doe and after the alienour which made such alienation be called by writ to the Parliament under the title or as Baron of such Honour Castle or Mannour so aliened he is not any more a Baron by tenure in respect of that place for that he hath aliened that away which he held by Barony but thenceforth after such writ of summons he is become a Baron by writ and may retaine the name of Baron by title of the place as Baron by writ such alienation notwithstanding forasmuch as the writ directed at the pleasure of the Prince doth give unto him that addition of name and dignity And thus much touching the resolution of the said question and satisfaction of the said objections and of Barons by tenure BARONS by writ which is the second kind of Barons mentioned in the former Divisions of BARONS A Baron by writ is he unto whom a writ of summons in the name of the King is directed to come to the Parliament appoinâ—ed at a certaine time and place to be holden and there with his Highnesse the Prelates Nobility and Peeres to treat and advise touching the waighty affairs of the Realme Tâ—e forme of which writ is much to the effect of the writ before mentioned in the title of Earle which kind of writ is as well directed to the Barons by tenure as Baâ—â—â—â— by creation Patent or otherwise But those which 〈◊〉 Barons by tenure nor by Patent and have onely 〈◊〉 writs are therefore called Barons by writ and upâ—◠〈◊〉 of such writ and place taken accordingly in 〈◊〉 ought to enjoy the name dignity and hoâ—â— of a Baron 〈◊〉 â—ouching the antiquity of Barons by writ onely and â—â—eir first institution I finde little or no mention before â—he time of H. 3. And therefore I conceive that either the first of all or at least that the first frequent use of such Barons was had and devised 49. H. 3. in case of necessity and upon a lamentable
signified unto the late Queene upon the Petition oâ— the sister and heire of Gregory late Lord Dacres deceased may appeare Moreover in the same Pedegree of the said Lord Dacres it is expressed that Thomas sometimes Lord Dacres had issue Thomâ—s his eldest son Ralph his second sonne and Humphrey his third sonne Thomas the eldest dyed in the life time of his Father having Issue Ioan his daughter and heire who was marryed unto Sir Richard Fines Knight And after Thomas Lord Dacres her Grandfather and Father unto the said Sir Ralph and Humphrey dyed After whose death Henry 6. by his Letters Patents bearing date at Westminster 7. Novem. Anno 7. regni reciting the said Peâ—egree and Marriage doth by his Lettâ—rs Pattents accept declare and repute the said Richard Fines to be Lord Dacres and one of the Barons of his Realme But afterward in the timâ— of Edw 4. the said Humphrey Dacres after the attaindor of the said Ralph and himselfe by an Act of Parliament which was in 1. Ed. 4. and after the death of the said Ralph and after the reversall of the same Act by another Act 12. Edw. 4. the said Humphrey made challenge unto the said Barony and to divers Lands of the said Thomas his Father whereupon both parties after their title had been considered in Parliament submitted themselves unto the Arbiâ—rement of King Edw. 4. and entred into Bond each â—o other for the performance thereof Whereupon the said King in his award under his Privie seale bearing date at Westminster 8. April Anno regni 13. did award that the said Rich Fines in the right of Ioan his wife and the Heires of his body lawfully begotten should be reputed had named and called Lord Dacres and that the said Richard Fines and the Heires of his body by the said Ioane begotten should keepe have and use the same state and place in every Parliament as the said Thomas Dacres Knight late Lord Dacres had used kept c. that the heires of the body of the said Thomas acres Knight late Lord Dacres lawfully begotten should have and â—old to them their Heites the Mannor of Holbech And furthermore the said King did award on the other part that the said Humphrey Dacres Knight and the Heires males of the said Thomas late Lord Dacres should be reputed had named and called the L. Dacres of Gillesland And that he and the heires males of the said Thomas then late Lord Dacres should have use and keepe the place in Parliament next adioyning beneath the said place which the said Rich Fines Knight Lord Dacres then had and occupied and that the heires of the body of the said Ioan his wife should have and occupie And that the Heires males of the said Thomas Dacres late L. Dacres should have to them to the heires males of their bodies begotten the Mannor of Jothington c. And so note that the name of the ancient Barony namely Gile sland remained unto the Heire male unto whom the land was entailed Moreover this is specially observed if any Baron by writ doe dy having none other issue then Female and that by some speciall entail or other assurance there be an heire male which doth enioy all or agreat part of the lands possessions and inheritances of such Barons deceased the Kings of this Realme have used to call to the Parliament by writ as Baron such here male omitting the Husband or issuâ— male of such heire female and this also appeareth by a notable controversie in the time of Henry 7. betweene Sir Robert Willoughby Lord Brooke and Richard Lord Latimer for the Barony of Latimer which in effect was The said Lord Brooke did challenge the Barony of Latimer as cosen and Heire to Elizabeth his great grandmother who was sister and heire to Iohn Nevill Lord Latimer who died without issue and hereupon exhibited a Petition to Henry 7. in Parliament whereto Richard then Lord Latimer was called to answer because he then enjoyed the said title and dignity The said Richard Lord Latimer by his answer did shew that it was true that after the death of the said Iohn Nevill Lord Latimer dying without issue the said Elizabeth was the sister and next heire and married unto Sir Thomas Willloughby Knight second son of the Lord VVilloughby but Henry 6. for that the said Iohn Nevill was dead without issue and that the next heire was female did therefore call to the Parliament George Nevill Knight second sonne of Ralph Earle of Westmerland to bee Lord Latimer as Cozen and next heire male of the said Iohn Nevillâ— Lord Latimer which George was grandfather of the said Richard Lord Latimer namely Father of Henry Lord Latimer Father of the said Richard In debate of which cause the question now in hand whether a Barony by writ may descend unto the heires females was advisedly considered of by the said King and his Nobility in Parliament and in the end adjudged with the said Richard Lord Latimer which President doth afford us two Iudgements in this point one in the time of Hen. 6. when the writ was directed to the said Sir George Nevill whereby he was summoned as Lord Latimer to the Parliament and as heire Male and not the said Sir Thomas Willoughby Knight husband of the said Eliz. heirâ— male And the second judgement was given in the time of Henry 7. wherby the Barony was adiudged vnto the said Richard Lord Latimer comming of the speciall heire male against the said Lord Brooke descended of the generall heire male But here the President before remembred of the Barony of Dacres may bee obiected to incounteâ— this confusion For there was an heire female married unto Sir Richard Fines who by the declaration of Hen. 6. was Baron of Dacres in the right of his wife and there was also Ralph and Humphrey the heires males before whom the heire female was preferred by the censure of Henry 6. and Edward 4. This obiection is easily answeared For although Hen. 6. through the Princely favour which he bare unto Sir Richard Fynes had declared him to bee Lord Dacres in the right of his wife yet notwithstanding did Ralph Dacres being heire male unto the then Lord Dacres deceased be are also the name of Lord Dacres by that name was attainted in Parliament Wherefore the reason why the heire male could not bee regarded was the said attainder of the said Ralph and Humfrey his brother and therefore when Humphrey 12. Edw. 4. laboured to have the said attainder reversed he submitted himselfe vnto the Arbitrament of the King who to satisfie both Competitors because both had well deserved of him after he had admitted them to his favour he allowed the one to be Lord Dacres the other to be Lord Dacres of Gillesland thus much concerning the second point whether a Barony by writ may discend unto the heire female or not As concerning the third point admitting such discent to bee to the heire female when there
Steward shall declare unto the people the cause why the King hath assembled thither those Lords and him and perswade him to answere without feare and then hee shall cause the Clarke of the Crowne to read his endictement unto him and aske him if hee bee guilty or not whereunto when hee hath answered not guilty the Clarke of the Crowne shall aske him how hee will bee tryed and then hee will say by God and his Peeres and then the Kings Sergeants and Attourney will give evidence against him whereunto when the Prisoner hath made answere the Constable shall bee commanded to retire the Prisoner from the Barre to some other place while the Lords doe secretly conferre in the Court together and then the Lords shall rise out of their places and consult amongst themselves and what they affirme shall bee done upon their Honour without any oath to bee ministred unto them and when they all or the greatest part of them bee agreed they shall returne to their places and sit downe and then the High Steward shall aske of the youngest Lord by himselfe if he that is arraigned bee guilty or not of the offence whereof hee is arraigned and then of the youngest next him and so of the residue one by one untill hee have asked them all and every Lord shall answere by himselfe and then the High Steward shall send for the Prisoner againe who shall bee led to the Barre to whom the High Steward shall reherse the verdict of the Peeres and give judgement accordingly Stamford Pleas del Coronae lib. 3. cap. 1. Poulton 188. The antiquity of this kind of triall by the opinion of the last recited Authours is grounded from the Statute of Magna charta so called not in regard of the quantity but in regard of the waight thereof Cooke Epistle to the 8. part fol. 2. c. 29. beginning thus Nullus liber homo c. nec supereum ibimus nec super eum mittemus nisi per legale judicium parvu ' suorum But I take it to bee more ancient then the time of Hen. 3. as brought into the Realme with the Conquerour being answerable to the Norman and French Lawes and agreeable with the Customes Fewdall where almost all the controversies arising betweene the Soveraigne and his vassall are tried per judicium Parvu ' suorum And if a Peere of the Realme upon his arraignement of treason doe stand mute or will not answere directly judgement shall bee given against him as a Traytour convicted and hee shall not bee pressed to death and thereby save the forfeiture of his lands for treason is out of the Statute of Westminster the first c. 12. 15. E. 4. 33. Dyer 205. and 300. But if hee bee arraigned upon an indictement of fellony hee may bee mute Iâ— appeareth by this Statute of Magna charta that a Peere of the Realme shall bee tried by his Peeres onely in case where hee is indicted at the Kings suite of treason or fellony for the words of the Statute bee Wee will not passe or sit in judgement upon him but by his Peeres But if an Appeale of murder or other fellony bee sued by any Common person against a Peere of the Realme hee shall bee tried by Common persons and not by his Peeres Stam. Pleas del Coron lib. 3. cap. 1. Brooke triall 142. Poulton 188. 6. This Priviledge hath some restraints as well in regard of the person as in the manner of proceedings As touching the person First the Archbishops and Bishops of this Realme though they bee Lords of the Parliament if they bee impeached of such an offence they shall not bee tried by the Peeres of the Realme but by a jury of Knights and other substantiall persons upon their oaths the reason thereof alleadged is for as much as Archbishops and Bishops cannot passe in like cases upon the triall of any other of the Peeres for that they are prchibited by the Common and Ecclesiasticall Lawes to bee Judges of life and death and reason would that the other Peeres should not trie them for this triall should bee mutuall for as much as is performed upon their Honours without any oath taken And so by the way you may see the great regard the Law hath to the word of a Peere of the Realme when hee speaketh upon his Honour even in a case concerning the life of a man and that of a Peere and therefore ought they much more to keepe their words and promises in smaller matters when they engate their Honours for any fast cause or consideration Crompton Courts 13. Secondly as touching the Persons no temporall Lords but they that are Lords of the Parliament shall have this kind of triall and therefore hereout are excluded the eldest Sonne and Heire apparant of a Duke in the life of his Father though he bee called an Earle and it was the case of Henry Howard Earle of Surrey Sonne and Heir apparent of Thomas Duke of Suffolke in 38. H. 8. which is in Brooks abridgement treason likewise the Son and Heir apparant of an Earl though he be called Lord or Baron And all the younger Sonnes of the Kings are Earles by birth though they have no other creation but shall not be partakers of this or other priviledges incident to the Lords of the Parliament Thirdly those that are Barons of the Nobility of Ireland or of Scotland if upon the like offence committed in England they be apprehended in England they shall not have their triall by Peeres no though they were borne within England for they received their dignity from a King of their Nations But if the King of England at this day do create one of his subjects of Scotland to be Viscount Roâ—hester within England or by ordinary summons under his great Seale doe call him to his upper House of Parliament do assign him a place and to have a voice there in his great Councell amongst the Lords and Peeres of the Realme he shall thereby also be a Peere of the Realme and be partaker with them in all priviledges and thus much concerning the restraint of the said priviledges in respect of the person as touching the manner of proceeding it appeareth by the said statute of Magna charta c 29. that a Peere of the Realme shall be tried by his Peeres only in case where he is indicted at the Kings suite of treason of fellony for the words of the statute be Nec super eum ibimus But if an appeale of murder or other fellony be sued by any Common person by a Peere of the Realme he shall be tried by Common persons and not by his Peeres Stam. Pleas del Corone lib. 3. cap. 1. Pâ—ulton 118. and so was Fines Lord Dacres tried in aâ—peale of murder 33. H. 8. Brooke Abridgement trials 142. The Nobility of this Realme enjoy that priviledge that they are not to be impanelled in any Iury or Inquests to mâ—ke tryall or Enquiry upon their corporall oathes betweene party and party for
of one and twenty yeares he shall be in ward but if the King had made him Knight in the life of his Father he should not have beene in ward after the death of his Father neither for the lands descended or for his marriage though he be within age Cooks 6. part 74. in Druries case Nobility and Lords in reputation onely THere are other Lords in reputation and appellation who neverthelesse are not de jure neither can they enjoy the priviledge of those of the Nobility that are Lords of the Parliament The sonne and heire of a Duke during his fathers life is onely by curtesie of speech and honour called an Earle and the eldest sonne of an Earle a Baron but not so in legall proceedings or in the Kings Courts of Iustice Brook Treason 2. But the King may at his pleasure create them in the life of their Ancestors into any degree of Lords of the Parliament Cook 8. part 16. b. A Duke or other of the Nobilitie of a forraigne Nation doth come into this Realme by the Kings safe conduct in which the Kings said Letters of Conduct he is named Duke according to his Creation yet that appellation maketh him not a Duke c. to sue or to be sued by that name within England but is onely so reputed But if the King of Denmark or other Soveraigne King come into England under safe conduct he during his aboad in England ought to bee stiled by the name of King though hee have not merum imperium out of his owne Kingdome yet he shall retaine honoris titulos Cook 7. part 15. b. sequentia All the younger sonnes of the Kings of England are of the Nobility of England and Earles by their birth without any other Creation and onely Lords in reputation And if an English man be created Earle of the Empire or of other title of honour by the Emperour he shall not beare the title in England and therefore is an Earle onely in reputation A Lord of Ireland and Scotland though he be a Postnatus is not a Lord in England in legall Courts of Iustice though he be commonly called and reputed a Lord. NOBLE VVOMEN ALthough Noble women may not sit in Parliament in respect of their sexe yet they are in the law Peeres of the Realm and all or most of the Prerogatives before mentioned which to Noblemen are belonging doe also appertaine to them Cook 8. part 53. But the opinion of some men hath been that a Countesse Baronesse or other woman of great estate cannot maintaine an action upon the statute de scandalis Magnatum because the statute of 2. R. 2. cap. 5. speaketh but of Prelates Dukes Earles Barons or other Nobles and other great men of the Realme and of the Chancellour Treasurer Clarke of the Privie Seale Steward of the Kings house Iustice of the one Bench or of the other great officers of the Realm by which words they conceive the meaning of the makers of that statute was onely to provide in that case for Lords and not for women of honour Crompton Justice of Peace 45. b. Also if any of the Kings servants within his Check-roll doe conspire the death of any Noble man it is not felony within the compasse of the statute 3. H. 7. cap. 13. Honourable women are of three sorts By creation by Descent or by Marriage King Henry the eighth created Anne Bullen Marchionesse of Pembrook and so may the King create any woman into any title of honour as to his Highnesse shall seem good As the King by by his Letters Patents openly read in the Parliament did create Widow the sole daughter of late Baron of Abergavenny Baronesse De le Spencer Cambden 63. 6. Noble women by descent are those to whom either the lands holden by such dignity do descend as heir and they are said to be honourable by tenure or those whose Ancestors to whom they are heires were seised of an estate descendable unto them in their titles of Dukedomes Earldomes or Baronies or those whose Ancestors were summoned to the Kings Parliament for thereby also an inheritance doth accrue to their posterities Noble women also are those who do take to their husbands any Lord or Peere of the Realme although they of themselves were not of any degree of Nobility Fortescue de laudibus legum Angliae fol. 100. Question and doubt hath been made whether if a man be summoned to the Parliament and afterwards die without issue male the dignity and title of honour may descend to the heire female and many arguments have beene made pro contra in that which at this time â— doe purposely omit because I have before discoursed thereof in the title of Barons in this Treatise Concerning the title of honour descendable to the heire female by reason of a tenure in her Ancestor there need no more doubt to be made than of offices of honour the which doe much import the publike wealth and being of estate of inheritance doe descend to the heire female if there be no heire male as the office of high-Constableship of England challenged in the time of H. 8. by the Duke of Buckingham and judged by the advice and resolution of the Judges as by a note of that case extant whereof my Lord Dyer in his Reports hath a memoriall is most evident Dyer 283. b. Kellaway 6. H. 8. 170. b. which descended to the daughters of Humphrey de Bohun Earle of Hereford and Essex as afore is declared the office of a Lord Steward descended to Blanch daughter of Henry Earle of Lancaster in whose right John of Gaunt her husband enjoyed the same The like may be said of the office of Earle Marshall which descended by an heire female unto the house of Norfolk all which offices are as unfit to be exercised by a woman as it is unfit for a woman to be summoned to the Parliament as Baronesse by writ as before is written And when the title of honour doth descend to a woman if question in Law doe arise betweene the noble woman and any other person whether she be of that degree of noblenesse or no the issue shall be tried by the Record thereof and by the Kings writ it shall be certified and not by a Jury of twelve men even as it should be in case her Ancestors had beene party Cooks 6. part 53. 7. part 15. Although the Lawes of this Realme regularly doe make all the daughters where there are no sonnes equally to inherit Lands and Tenements and to be but one heire to their Ancestor yet it is not so in the descent of dignities and titles of honour for inheritances concerning matters of honour being things in their nature entire paticipating of superiority and eminency are not partable amongst many and therefore must of necessity descend unto one and that is to the eldest daughter sister aunt or cosin female inheritable where there is no heires males that may lawfully challenge the same and so in
of his Substitution in Latine therefore called Vicecomes as it is to be read at large in Cambden The Earls in recompence of their travell concerning the Officers of the County received a Sallary namely the third peny of the profits of the said County which custome continued a long time after the Conquest and was inserted as a Princely benevolence or gift in their Patents of Creation as by divers ancient Patents thereof may appear which afterwards were turned into pensions for the better maintenance of that honour as appeareth by a Book Case upon the pleading of a Pattent whereby King Henry the sixth Created that worthy Knight Sir John Talbott Earl of Shrewsbury which pension is so annexed to their dignity as that by any means of Alienation it cannot be at any time severed and disjoyned from the same and therefore in respect of such pensions which were the third part of the profits of the County or such other sum given in lieu thereof some men have not without probability thereof imagined quod Comites nominabantur quia in multis fiscu Regii Socii et Comites item participes essent vide Cooks 7 part 34. a. Of the single Earls and not Palatine within the Realm of England there were and have been principally two kindes but every of them subdivided into severall branches for they either take name of a place or hold their title without any place at all Those that take their name of a place are of two kindes for either the same place is a County and this is most usuall as the Earl of Devon-Shire Cornwall Kent c. or else of some other place being no County as a Town Castle Honour or such like of which later sort some are most ancient having their originall even from the Conquerer or shortly after as the Earldome of Richmond in York-Shire Clarence in Suffolk Arundel ni Sussex all which had their originall in the time of the Conquerer by Donation of those Castles and Honors the Earldome of Bath in the time of H. 7. and after in the time of H. 8. erected in the Family where it now remayneth and the Earldome of Bridgewater whereof Giles Dawbery was created in the time of H. 7. Earldomes which have their titles without any place are likewise of two kindes either in respect of office as is the Earl Marshall of England for it is granted in this or the like manner Officium Marescalli Angliae with further words viz. A. B. c. Comitem Marescallum Anglia creamus ordinavimus constituimus c. By which it appeareth that the very Office is an Earldom which title of Earl Marshall of England King Richard 2. gave first to Thomas Newbray Earl of Nottingham whereas before they were simply stiled Marshalls of England Cambden 167. The second sort of Earls by birth and so are all the Sonnes of the Kings of England if they have no other dignity bestowed upon them and therefore it was said that John afterwards King of England in the life of his Father Hen. 2. was called countiscane terrae before he was affied to Alice the daughter of the Earl of Moreton in France though Hollenshed fol. 103. writing of the degrees of people in England saith That the Kings younger Sonnes are but Gentlemen by birth till they have received creation from the King of high estate Earls and all others of the degree of Nobility and honour have Offices of great trust and confidence being for two principall purposes ad consulendum Regi tempore Pacis to Councell the King in time of peace the other ad defendendum Regem Patriam tempore belli to defend the King and Country in time of Warre and therefore Antiquity hath given unto them two Ensignes to resemble both the said duties For the first the head is adorned with a Cap of honour and a Coronet and the body with a Robe in resemblance of Councell Secondly They are girt with a sword in resemblance that they must be faithfull and true to defend the Prince and Country Cooks 7. part 34. a. But to come to the Kings high Councell of Parliament No man ought to presume before he hath received the Kings-Writ of Summons for the rule is ad consilium ne accedas antequam voceris the forme of a writ of Summons to an Earl is as followeth Rex c. Unto his welbeloved Cofin Edward Earl of Oxford greeting Because by the assent and advise of our Councell for certain weighty and urgent businesse concerning us the State and defence of our Kingdom and Church of England we have ordained to be holden a certain Parliament at our Citie of Westminster the 22. day of November next coming and there together with you and with the Prelates the great and noble men of our said Kingdom to have conference and treaty commanding and firmely enjoyning you upon your faith and alleageance whereby you are holden unto us that the dangers and perills imminent of that businesse considered and all excuse set a part you be present the said day in the same place with us and with the Prelates and great and noble men aforesaid to treat and give Councell upon the aforesaid businesse and hereof fail you not as you tender us our honour and the safeguard and defence of our Kingdom and Church aforesaid Witnesse our self at Westminster in the second day of March in the first yeer of our Raign Cromptons Courts tit Parliam 1. which is recited out of the Book of Entries 594. Upon this Writ three things have been observed First A priviledge incident to an Earl or other of degree above him for the Kings doth salute him by the name of his Coâ—in although he peradventure be of no consanguinity to the King Secondly When the King doth summon an Earl or any other Peer of the Realm of the Parliament he doth send his Writ directed to himself particularly and not to the Sheriff of the County as the generall Summons are for Knights and Burgesses for the Parliament Thirdly The Writ is to the Earl of Oxford greeting not naming him Knight though he be a Knight and though that degree be parcell of his name as appeareth 3. Hen. 6. fol. 29. And Priscot chief Justice in the 32. H. 6. 29. That iâ— an Esquire be made Knight he looseth the name of Esquire But if a Knight be made a Nobleman he doth still retain the name of Knight and so ought to be stiled in all Writs And Cooks 4. part fol. 118. a. saith Thâ— if a Baron be created an Earl yet his title of Baroâ— doth continue Bâ—t in Plowdens Book 213. It is agreed That if the Crown of England do descend to a Duke within England his name of Duke is gone for omne â—â— jus tollit minus The increase of Name by the Addition of Honour AFter a Man is created an Earl Viscount or in any other title of honour above them his title become parcell of his name and not an addition
generalty answerable to every kinde thereof in this manner A Baron is a dignity of Nobility and Honour next under the Vicount above the Banneret and Valvasor adorned with the title of Lord holding with us the same place as did the Patricii or Senators amongst the Romans The Books of Law do make difference between Dukes Earls Marquesses and Vicounts which are allowed names of dignity and the Baron For they affirm that Baron needs not to be named Lord or Baron by his Writ But the Dukes Marquesses Earls or Vicounts ought to be named by their names of dignity 8. H. 6. 10. 32. H. 6. 3. Cook 8. parts 53. b. a. part Pigot Lambert l. 4. 488. Cambden fol. saith that our common Lawyers do not allow a Baron to be one of the degrees of the Nobility Neverthelesse I do take the Books are to be understood of the Barons by Tenure or Barons by Writ only For the title of a Baron by Patent is in his Letters Patents under the great Seal adorned and named by the stile of Status gradus dignitas and therefore as requisit to be named as such dignities are a parcell of the Name of the possâ—ssor as well as the Stile and Title of a Duke Maâ—quesse Earl and Vicount c. And although there may be conceived this difference last mentioned between the Baron by Tenure or Writ and the Baron by Patent yet they being all Members of the higher House of the Parliament they are thereby made equally Noble Honorable and Peers of the Realm as they are Barons only without any other distinction that I have observed and thus much concerning the three degrees of Barons within this Realm may suffice to be said in generall upon this occasion for the better understanding and direction of the rest to be handled The Etymology and Derivation of the Name Baron MAny Wits have laboured to yeeld the Etymologie and signification of this word wherein following their own fantasies there hath been bred much variation of opinion As for Etymology of words I agree with him that saith That it is Levis fallax plerumque ridicula for saepenumero ubi proprietas verborum attenditur sensus veritatis amittitur It may have some use and serue a turn in Schools but it is to light for judgements in Law and Seats of Justice Cook 7. part l. 27. b. Thomas Aquinas setteth down a more certain rule in vocibus videndum noâ— tam à quo quam ad quid sumitur and words should be taken sensu currenti for use and custome is the best expositor of Laws and words quem penes Arbitrium jus norma loquendi In the Lord Chancellors Speech in the Case of Postnati fol. 61. And forasmuch as the word may aptly import men of strength Bracton as before appeareth not unaptly useth this signification thereof in these words Sunt alii potentes sub Rege quidicuntâ—r Barones boc est Robur belli The Antiquity of the Dignity of Barons and the sundry uses of the Name IT seemeth that the dignity was more ancient then the Name for in the ancient Constitutions Feodall of the Land there is no mention made of the name of Barons howbeit the learned Interpreters do understand that dignity to be comprehended under those which are there called Valuasores Majores and afterward called Capitanii for of the Valuasores there were three kindes Valuasores Majores Gve Capitanii which are thought to be the Barons Valuasores minores and valuasini or valuasores minimi The like dignity within this Realm before the Conquest had those which of the English Saxons were called Tbanes whereof read Lambert in his Preambulation of Kent Fol. 366. And the Book of Dooms-day remaining in the treasury of the Exchequer Neverthelesse the name of the Baron was not much used within this Realm untill the Norman Conquest and after that the word Baron seemeth to be frequented in this Realm in lieu and place of the word Tbane among the English Saxons for as they in generall and large signification did some time use the same to the sence and meaning and to import a Free-man borne of a free parentage or such like so did the Normans use the word Baron and therefore called their free Citizens of their best esteemed Cities and free Burgesses of their best esteemed Towns and Borroughes by the name of Barons And so the Citizens of London Barons of London in divers ancient Monuments of whom also Bracton maketh mention Fol. 272. a. Also there are divers Charters wherein mention is made of such like Barons as the Barons of Worwick in the Record of Doomsday and even to our time the free Burgesses of the five priviledged Ports are called Barons of the Cinque Ports And for that also divers of the nobility of Barons as well spirituall as temporall did in ancient time sit in the Exchequer to determine the difficulties and doubts there arising The Judges of that Court have been from most ancient time called and yet are Barons of the Exchequer Moreover the English Saxons had two kindes of Tbanes the like hath been observed as touching Barons for the Kings and Monarchs of this Realm have had their immediate Barons being the Peers of the Realm and in like manner certain other of the Nobility especially Earls which have had jurisdiction Palatine and Earls Marchers whose Countries have confined upon the coasts of the enemy have had under them for their better defence a kinde of Barons As namely under the County Palatine of Chester were these Barons the Barons of Halton Mounthalt Malebanck Shipbrooks Malpase Massa Rinderton Stockport c. The Earldom of Pembrook in Westwales being first erected by Arnulpâ—us Mountgumory that conquered part of that Country And therefore the Earls thereof being an Earl Marcher had also under him his Barons as appeareth by the Parliament Rolles 18. Ed. 1. It hath been therefore a common opinion received that every Earldom in times past had under it ten Barons and every Barony ten Knights Fees holden of him and that those that had fourteen Knights Fees were usually called and promoted to the dignity of Baron Also Lords and Proprietors of Mannors were in respect of them oftentimes in ancient remembrance cal'd Barons but abasiveth and the Courts and their Mannor called thereof Courts Barons of which Glamvile speaketh Fol. 67. l. 8. c. 11. It resteth now for the more explanation of the use of the name of Baron that we call to remembrance that which hath been before spoken that the custome of our Countrie is that if a Baron be created an Earl the eldest son of the said Earl in the life of his Father taketh upon him the name and title of the Barony although he want the Priviledges belonging to a Baron The tenor and proper signification of the word Baron BArons honourable are of three kinds by Tenure by Writ by Creation As for Barons by prescription which some men have spoken of they are intended
Marquesse Earle Vicount or Baron do as the manner is by his Letters Parents give unto such new created Noblemen an Annuity or Rent for the support of his degree which they call creation Money this is so annexed unto the Dignity that by no grant assurance or any manner of Alienation it can be given from the same but is still incident and a support of the same Creation Dyer fol. 2. c. Jn all Cases wherein Suite of Law a Baron or Peere of the Realme is to be amerced other then a Duke his amercement is no â—esseâ—â—â—a 100. s. 9 E. 4. 9. 21. E. 4. 77. 38. E. 3. 31. 9. Hâ— 6. 21. but the amercement of a Duke is 10. l. 19. E. 4. 9. â— H. 6. 7. although the Statute of Magna Charta Chap. 14. be in the negative viz. Comites at Barones non â— merciantur nisi per pures suos et non nisi secundum modum delicti and yet the usage hath reduced it into a certainty also by the same Statute it appeareth that such amercements should be afferred per pures suos but for that it were troublesome to assemble Barons for so small a matter such amercements in times past hath beene afferred by the Barons of the Exchequer who sometimes were Barons of the Realme as is before in this Treatise mentioned and hereof writeth Bracton Lib. 3. Tract 2. chap. Fol. 116. viz. Comitet vero vel Barones non sunt amerciandi nisi per paces suos secundum modum delicti hoc per Barones de Scacario vel coram ipso Rege Vid. Cooke 8. part 39. sequentiae this Section is to be omitted because it is more fitly to be written hereafter If a Plaintiffe recover against a Peere of the Realme in an Action of debt or trespasse upon such a Plea pleaded by him or other default in him so that a Fine thereby doth grow to the King and thereupon a Capias per Fine issueth out against him this shall not prejudice that Nobleman so as the Plaintiffe may thereby take advantage by prayer that he shall abide in Execution for the Plaintiffe neither without his prayer not though he doe pray it by the opinion of Brian Justice 14. H. 7. 21. VVhereas by a Statute made 32. H. 8. Cap. 16. Jt is enacted that the Subjects of the Realme shall not keepe in their Families or Houses above the number of Foure Strangers borne neverthelesse by a proviso in the said Act every Lord of the Parliament hath his priviledge allowed unto him to keepe in his Family the number of six Strangers borne any thing in that Act to the contrary notwithstanding By the Statute of 24. H. 8. Cap. 13. a. A Priviledge was granted to the Nobility according to their degrees concerning their Apparell but because by a Statute made in the first Yeare of the King that now is Chap. 25. all Lawes and Statutes made concerning Apparell are taken away I leave further to speake of that matter 1. Jac. cap. 25. By the Statute of 5. R. 2. cap. 12. The King our Soveraigne Lord of his Royall Majesty defendeth the passe utterly of all manner of people aswell Clarkes as others in every Port and other Towne and place upon the Coasts of the Sea upon the paine of forfeiture of all their goods except onely the Lords and other great men of the Realme and true and Noble Merchants and the Kings Souldiers and every person then is before excepted which after publication of this Ordinance made shall passe out of the said Realme without the Kings speciall Lycence which Lycence the King willeth and commandeth that it be not from henceforth made but in one of the Ports vnder written that is to say London Sandwich Dover Southampton Plimouth Dartmouth Bristoll Yarmouth St. Buttolphe Kingstone upon Hull Newcastle upon Tine and the other parts and passages towards Ireland and the Iles pertaining to England shall forfeit towards the King as much as he hath in goods as afore is said but because this Statute is also taken away by a late Act of Parliament made in the fourth yeare of King James cap. 1. J doe not set downe this for one of the Priviledges appertaining to the Nobility at this day But Phillip Earle of Arundel Sonne of Thomas Duke of Norffolke was taken upon the Sea passing into France about the 30. yeare of the late Queene and was fined in the Star-chamber to a great summe because he did not take Shipping at one of the Ports mentioned Cromptons Courts 31. Whereas by the Statute of 2. H. 2. Parl. 2. cap. 1. Jt is ordained that the Justices of Peace in every County named of the Cuâ—rum should be resident in the Shieres wherein they are Justices there is a Proviso whereby the Lord and Peeres of the Realme named in such Commission are excepted By the Statute of 1. E. 6. cap. 12. amongst other things it is enacted that in all and every case and Cases where any of the Kings Subjects shall and may upon his Prayer have the Priviledge of his Clergie as a Clarke Convict that may make purgation in all those Cases and every of them and also in every Case and Cases of Fellony wherein the priviledge and benefit of Clergie is taken away by this Statute wilfull malice and poysoning of malice prepensed onely excepted the Lord and Lords of the Parliament and Peere and Peeres of the Realme having place and voyce in Parliament shall by vertue of this Act of Common grace upon his and their Requests and Prayer alleadging that he is a Lord or Peere of the Realme claiming the benefit of this Act though hee cannot reade without burning of the Hand losse of Inheritance or corruption of his blood bee adjudged deemed taken and used for the first time onely to all Jnstructions intents and purposes as a Clarke Convict which may make purgation without any further or other benefit of the Clergy to any such Lord or Peere from thenceforth at any time after for any cause to bee allowed adjudged or admitred any Law Custome Statute or any thing to the contrary notwithstanding By this Statute a Lord of the Parliament shall have the priviledge of his Clergy where a common person shall not viz. for the breaking of a house by day or night for robbing of any in the high way and in all other cases excepted in the Statute of 1. E. 6. 12. saving in wilfull murder and poysoning But in all other cases wherein Clergy is taken away by any Statute made since the said Statute of 1. E. 6. he is in the same Degree that a common and inferior person is but the Court will not give him the benefit of this Statute if he doe not require it Jf the Lord of the Parliament doth confesse his offence upon his Arraignment or doth abjure or is ourlâ—wed for Fellony it seemes that in those cases he may have the benefit of this Statute viz. his Clergy for that by the Statute of 18.
Land-lord and that by the space of two yeares whereupon he doth bring a writ of Cessavit which is his remedy given him by the Law thereby to recover the inheritance of the land but the said Lord for the saving of his tenancy being minded to pay all the arrerages before judgment given against him as by the Law hee ought to doe in this case hee must come in proper person and not by Atturney 15. H. 7. 9. b. If a noble man in contempt of any processe which hath beene awarded from out of any the Kings Courts doth make rescous and wilfully doth refuse to obey the said writ and the same his offence doth appeare of record to the Court by the Sheriffs returne there may be and shall be awarded against him a Capias 1 H. 5. Case ult 27 H. 8. 22. Cooks 6. part 54. If any Lord doe depart this Realm as Ambassadour or otherwise by the Kings licence or without licence and doe not returne at the Kings Commandement or upon the Kings writ under his privy Signet the King may seize his lands goods and chattells Dyer 108. b. 17. the Dutchesse of Suffolks case If a Lord arrested upon a Supplicavit for the peace doe wilfully refuse to obey the arrest and make rescous upon his returne shall issue an attachment against the said Lord for his contempt to take his body and this is the way to obtaine peace against any Lord of the Parliament whereas the party could not have an attachment against him if the Subpoena had beene duly served and peaceably accepted although the said Lord had not appeared thereunto Cromptons Justice of Peace 134. If a Lord of the Parliament doth with force and arms detaine a man in prison in his House or elsewhere the remedy is in such cases by himselfe or his friends abroad at liberty to have a writ called de homine replegiando to deliver him but if the Lord to prevent the execution thereof and of malice doe keep or convey away this man so wrongfully imprisoned so privily as that the Sheriffe cannot execute his said writ then will the Court award a Witheram whereby the Sheriffe shall attach and arrest the body of the said Lord and imprison him untill he doe deliver his said prisoner 11 H. 4. 15. All Lords are compellable to take the Oath mentioned in the Statute of 3 Jac. 4. vide the Statute 7 Jac. cap. 6. who have authority to minister the said Oath to them Bracton lib. 5. fol. 337. 6. H. 3. 351. writing of essoines delivereth this learning that if a Baron that holdeth by Baron tenure have his absence excused by essoine he which casteth such essoine or excuse ought to finde surety that the said essoine is true but in case of common persons it shall rest upon the credit and integrity of the Essoinee and so is the use at this day The Statute of magna charta cap. 1â— is quod liber homo non amercietur pro parvo delicto nisi secundum modum illius delicti pro magno delicto secundum magnitudinem delicti nulla praedictarum misericordiarum ponatur nisi per Sacramentum proborum legalium hominum de vicinate and accordingly is the Law thereunto at this day But the subsequent words in the said Statute viz. Comites Barones non amercientur nisi per pares suos non nisi secundum modum delicti are not in use for whether the offence be great or small for which they are to be amerced their amercement must be certaine viz. of a Duke ten pound and of any other of the Nobility Also whereas the amercement should be offered per pares the use is to offer them by the Barons of the Exchequer Cooks 8. Rep. 40. Bracton lib. 3. Tractat. 2. cap. 1. fol. 116. b. When a Peere of the Realme is arraigned in Appeale of Fellony he shall not have that priviledge to bee tried by his Peere as he should in case of Inditement but must undergoe the ordinary triall of twelve men Stamford Pleas of the Crowne lib. 3. cap. 1. Brook triall 142. Ferdinando Poulton 188. b. Read the book of Entries title appeale Sect. 7. also in Case of an Inditement the Defendant though a Peere of the Realme may not challenge any of his Triers either peremptorily or upon causes which in like cases permitted to all other common persons The Judgement to be given against any Lord of the Parliament in case of Felony or Treason shall be no other than according to the usuall judgement given against common persons and although the execution be not pursuant but with the losse only of their heads yet that is by the speciall grace of the King and not ex debito as by the examples of Thomas Lord Dacre 33. H. 8. and of the Lord Sturton 2 Mariae may appeare Brook tit Jury 48. By attainder of Treason or Fellony is corruption of blood so that their Children may not be heires unto them nor unto any of their Ancestors And if hee were a noble man before he is by the attainder made ignoble and not only himselfe but also his Children having no regard unto the Nobility which they had by their birth and this corruption is so strong and high that it cannot be saved by the Kings pardon or otherwise than by authority of Parliament Stamford Pleas del Coronae lib. 3. cap. 34. But here it is to bee observed that Nobility is not a thing substantiall but meere accidentall for that may be present or absent without corruption of the Subject whereof it dependeth for experience sheweth that the passage of honourable titles are restrained by exorbitant crimes when as nature in the meane while cannot bee thrust away with a fork Wherefore although the Lawyers doe terme and call that extinguishment of Nobility which hapneth by such hainous offences committed as corruption of blood neverthelesse they use not this manner of phrase and speech as though Nobility were naturally and essentially in the humour of blood more than any other hereditary faculty but because the right of inheritance which is by degree of communication of blood directed is by that meanes determined and ended and also in regard of the hatred and detestation of the crime it is called corruption of blood note in Dyer 16. Eliz. 332. the Lord Charles Howards case If one be made a Knight in a forraigne Kingdome by a forraigne Knight yet he is to be so stiled in this Realme in all legall proceedings but if a man be created by the Emperour an Earle of the Empire or into any other title of dignity he shall not beare this title here in England Cooks 7. part 16. 20. E. 46. If there be a Father and Sonne and the Father is seised of lands holden in Capite or otherwise by knightly service the King doth create the same Duke and Earle or of any other degree of Nobility and afterwards the Father dieth his Sonne being within the age
this point is the civill Law Neverthelesse there was a judgment in the time of H. 3. touching the descent of the Earldome of Chester after the death of the Earle who dyed without issue his sisters being his heires which Judgement was that the said Earldome should bee divided amongst the said copartners as other lands and that the eldest should not have it alone 23. H. 3. Fitz. partic 18. But this judgement was holden erroneous even in those times wherein it was given For Bracton a learned Judge who lived in that age thus writeth thereof treating of Partition among Copartners lib. 2. cap. 34 fol. 76 b. De hoc autem quod dicitur quod de feodo militare veniunt in divisione capitalia messuagia inter cohaeredes dividuntur hoc verum est nisi capitale messuagium illud sit caput comitatus propter jus gladii quod dividi non potest vel caput Baeroniae castrum vel aliud aedificium hoc ideo ne sit caput per plures particulas dividetur plura jura Comitat ' Baroniarum deveniant ad nihilum per quod deficiat regnum quod ex Comitatibus Baroniis dicitur esse constitutum Si autem plura sunt aedificia quae sunt capita Baeroniae dividi possunt inter cohaeredes facta electione salvo jure essentiae quia cùm plura sunt ibi jura quodlibet per se poterit integrè observart quod quidem non est in uno ut praedictum est licet à quibusdam dicatur quòd in aliis regionibus aliquando de consuetudine dividatur sed quod nunquam dividi debeat in Anglia videtur nec visum fuit contrarium erit consuetudo regionis observanda ubi haereditas quae petitur personae nascuntur quae petunt unde sic dicatur quòd in regno Angliae aliquando facta fuit partitio hoc fuit injustum It is therefore evident that Baronies and dignities of Honour do by the Lawes of this Realm descend unto the eldest Coapercener and the Iudgement given once to the contrary thereof Bracton doth rightly account to be unjust his reason is notable for in as much as the honour of the Chivalry of the Realme doth chiefly consist in the Nobility reason would not that such dignitie should be divided amongst Coaparceners whereby through multitude of partitions the reputation of Honour in such snccession and so divided might be impaired or the strength of the Realme being drawne into many hands with the decrease of livelihood by partition should be enfeebled in which Resolution Britton the learned Bishop of Hereford who compiled his Booke of the Lawes of the Realme by the commandement and in the name of E. 1. according Britton 187. and therefore howsoever that Judgemâ—nt was given or whensoever it is neverthelesse very evident that it was soone redressed for if it were given upon the death of Renulph the last of that name the Earle of Chester who dyed about 17. H. 3. without issue the Writers of that time doe testifie that the Earledome of Chester came wholly unto Iohn Scot the sonne of David Earle of Huntington and Anguish and of Maud the eldest sister of the said Renulph if it were given upon the death of the said Iohn Scot who dyed without issue about 14. H. 7. yet notwithstanding the said Judgement stood not in force for that the said King assumed the said Earledome into his owne hands upon other satisfaction made to the sisters Coparceners of the said Iohn Scot. Ne tanta hereditas colos deduceretur Matth. Paris Monast S. Albani in Arr. fol. 3. 66. B. tamen vide Vill. fol. 75. et Ioh. Guill 78. For this it is to be observed out of Presidents and to be acknowledged of every dutiful Subject that the King is at liberty to call and advance to honour whom his Highnesse shall in his Princely wisdome thinke most meet and therfore whereas Ralph Lord Cromwell being a Baron by Writ dyed without issue having two sisters and co-heires Elizabeth the eldest married unto Sir Thomas Nevill Knight and Ioane the younger married unto Sir Hunt Burther hee who married the younger sister was called unto the Parliament as Lord Cromwell and not the said Sir Thomas Nevill who had married the eldest sister and Hugh Lupus the first and great Earle of Chester was by the Conquerour his Uncle created Earle of Chester Habemus sibi heredibus adeo libere per gladium sicut ipse Rex tenuit Angliam per Coronam Hugh dyed without issue and the inheritance of his Earledome was divided amongst his foure sisters and the eldest had not the Seigniory entire unto her selfe Reade Mills 74 75. Cookes b. part 53. 7. part 15. If a Woman be Noble by birth or by discent with whomsoever she doth marry though her Husband bee under her degree yet she doth remaine Noble for her Birthright Est Character in delibilis Cook 4. part 118. b. 6. part 53. b. Other Women are enobled by Marriage and the text saith thus viz. Women with the honour of their Husbands and with the kindred of their Husbands we worship them in the Court we decree matters to passe in the name of their Husbands and into the house and sirname of their Husbands wee doe translate them but if afterwards a woman doe marry with a man of baser degree then loseth she her former Dignitie and followeth the condition of her latter Husband Fortescue de laudibus legum Angl. 100. And as concerning the second disparaged Marriage as aforesaid many other bookes of the law doe agree for these bee rules received in those Cases Si mulier nobilis nupserit ignobili desit esse nobilis eadem modo quo quidem Constitut dissolvitur Cookes 6. part 53. B. 4. part 118. It was the Case of Ralph Hayward Esquire who tooke to his wife Anne the widdow of the Lord Powes they brought an Action against the Duke of Suffolke by the name of Ralph Hayward Esquire and the Lady Anne Powes his wife and exception was taken for misnaming her because shee ought to have beene named by the Husbands Name and not otherwise and the exception was by the Court allowed For said they by the Law of God shee is Sub potestate viri and by our Law her Name of Dignitie shall bee changed according to the degree of her Husband notwithstanding the curtesies of the Ladies of Honour and Court Dyer 79. And the like was also in Queene Maries Raigne when the Dutchesse of Suffolke tooke to her Husband Adrian Stoakes Prob. 456. and many other presidents have beene of latter time and herewith agreeth the Civill Law punctually Digest lib. 1. Tit. 9. Lege 8. Eodem de Dignitate Liber 12. Lege 2. In this case of acquired Nobility by Marriage of Question in Law be whereupon an issue is taken betweene the parties that is to say Dutchesse or not Dutchesse Countesse or not Countesse Baronesse or not Baronesse the
of dignity and the Entry of Capias alias plures was according to the said originall but in the Exigent and Proclamation and in the Entry of it the Defendant was named according to his degree of Dignity upon a Writ of Errour after judgment doubt was if this might be amended in another Court then where the originall was made and at last it was resolved by all the Court that the Record should be amended by the Cursitor and made according to the Note or Title delivered unto him by the Plaintiffes Attorney Cook 8. part fol. 15. b. It appeareth in our Book of Law that the highest and lowest Dignity are uniuersall For as if a King of a Forreign Nation come into England by leave of the King of this Realm as it ought to be in this case he shall sue and be sued in the name of a King 11. Ed. 3. Test Breccon 473. So shall he sue or be sued by the Name of a Knight whersoever he received that degree of Dignity 20. Ed. 4. 6. H. 6. 14. but otherwise it is as if a Duke Marquesse Earl or other Title of Honour given by any Forreign King yea though the King by Letters Pattents of safe conduct do name him Duke or by any other his forreign Title of Dignity For experience sheweth that Kings joyned in league together by a certain mutuall anâ— as it were a Naturall power of Monarchs according to the Law of Nations have denized one anothers subjects and Ambassadors graced with this title of Honour Therefore though a Knight receive his Dignitie of a Forraigne Prince he is so to be stiled in all Legall proceedings within England Vide Cooke 7. part fol. 16. b. And Kings were wont to send their sonnes to their Neighbour Princes to receive Knighthood at their hands Vide Selden fol. 331. 308. thinking that it was more honourable to take Armes of some other lest affection might seeme to prevent judgement when the father gave them that honour Thus was our King H. 2. sent unto David King of Scots and Malcombe also king there sent unto our H. 2. and our king to the king of Castile to take of them Military or Civill Armes for the tearmes and phrases they used in that age for the making of a knight Vide Camden 174. 8. vide Selden fol. 315. And knights in all forraigne Countries have ever place and precedencie according as they are ancient knights which priviledge is deemed to Noblemen for be they never so ancient in forraigce Countries they shall goe before as Puesneys The degree of knighthood is not onely a Dignitie and honour to the party for so it is termed in Brooke title Additions fol. 44. but honourable for the kingdome and therefore it hath been an ancient Prerogative of the kings of this Realm at their pleasure to compell men of worth to take upon them this degree upon the payment of a Fine as appeareth in Ann. 7. H. 6. 15. Fitzh Abridg. tit Im. 12. and by the Statute a. 1. Ed. 2. de militibus But we see by experience in these daies that none are compelled thereunto and that is the reason wherefore if the Plaintiffe be made knight hanging the Writ it shall abate because hâ— hath changed his name and that by his owne act Vide Cooke 7. part f. 27. b. part 10. b. 1 Ed. 6. cap. 7. contrary And for that cause also by the common Law not only the king but every Lord of a Manor ought to have of every of his tenants a reasonable fine to make his eldest son knight Vide Bracton fol. 36. b. and all lands are subject to these aides except onely ancient Demeasnes and grand and petty serjeantly tenures as the Law hath been anciently delivered Vide Fiszh Nat. bre f. 83. a. and Selden f. 13. where it is also said one that wrote a little after the statute of West the first allowes as a good barre to the avowry for the tenant to plead that the father himself is no knight so that one not knighted cannot claime the aide of his own Tenants Briton de Prises de Avers And it was not at the liberty of the Lord to make more or lesse of his Tenants by the common Law in this case but by the statute at Westminster 1. cap. 35. it is put into certainty viz. forasmuch as before this time reasonable and to make one son knight or to marry his daughter was never put into certainty nor how much should be taken at that time whereby some levyed unreasonable aide and more often then seemed necessary whereby the people were sore grieved And it is therefore provided that from henceforth a whole knights fee be taken but 20. s. and of more more and of lesse lesse after that rate and that none shall levie such aide to make his son knight untill the sonne be 15. yeares of age nor to marry his daughter untill she be of the age of 7. yeares and of that there shall be mention made in the kings Writs formed on the same if any one will demand it and if it happen that the Father after he had leavied any such aid of his Tenants did before he hath marryed his Daughter the Executors of the Father shall be bound to the daughter for so much as the Father received for the Aid And if the Fathers goods be not sufficient his heir shall be charged therwith unto the daughter and this Heir is so incident that although the Lord do confirm unto the Tenant to hold by fealty and certain Rent and release unto him all other services and demands yet he shall have the aid to make his eldest Son Knight Anno 40. E. 3. f. 22. Finches book 24. but the King was not bound by the statute beforementioned because the King was not named in that statute and therfore by the statute 25. E. 3. cap. 11. The Kings aids were brought to a like value Selden fol. 3. 30. The intention of the Law is that an heir within the age of 21. years is not able to do Knight-service till his full age of 21. years Littleton lib. 2. cap. 4. f. 22. But such a presumption of Law doth give place to a judgment and proof to the contrary as Bracton saith Sabilitur presumptioni donec probetur in contrarium And therfore the King who is the Sovereign and Supream Judge of Chivalry hath dubbed him Knight he by this hath judged him able to do him Knight-service and all men concluded not to say to the contrary therfore such an heir being made Knight either in the life of his Father or afterwards during his minority shall be out of ward and custody both for Lands and for his body or marriage by the ancient common Law by reason also that the Honour of Knight-hood is so great that it is not to be holden under by any yet if the King do create any such an Heir within Age a Duke or Marquesse Earl Count Viscount or Baron by this
But this objection is repugnant to the nature of a descent which for the most part doth carry the patrimony descendable by act in law presently upon the death of the Ancestor unto the heire or not at all Wherefore the custome of our countrey and manifold presidents doe prove that this kind of Barony doth descend from the Ancestors to the heire and there needs not any words of heirs in the writ of summons Onely one president there is in a speciall writ sometimes directed to Sir Henry Bromsted in 27. H. 6. wherein he was stiled Lord Veysey wherein there are these words inserted Volumus tamen vos haeredes vestros masculos de corpore vestro legitimè procreatos exeuntes Barones de Veysey existere which is to bee read in Co. 7. part 33. b. Wherefore as it is true that where the heire of any such Baron by writ is called to the Parliament that his descent of honour is thereby established and approved by the gracious judgment of cur sacred Soveraigne so it is also true that if it shall stand with his Highnesse pleasure that such heire shall not be summoned at all for none can come to so high a Councel unlesse he be called then that Nobility is much empaired and in a manner extinguished in the censure of all men for that it had none other originall but by writ of summons from the which in the judgment of the supreme soveraign he is excluded As to the second principall point whether the Barony by writ may descend to the heires females it shall not be amisse likewise to view the reasons of either part and by conflict of argument the truth may the better be discerned Those that maintain the affirmative part do reason after this manner In reason the sexe of the heire female ought no more to bar her of the dignity than the nonage of the heire male ought to bar him although during his nonage he be unable to do the service but as the service of the one is for borne for a time so the sexe of the other may at all times be supplied by the maturity and sufficiency of her husband Offices of honour which do much import the publiquè weale being passed by inheritance do descend to the heire female if there be no nearer heire male As the office of the high Constableship of England which descended to the daughters of Humphrey de Bohun Earle of Hereford and Essex a memoriall whereof is in Dyer 285. but more at large in Keilway 6. H. 8. Also the office of Lord-Steward descended to Blanch daughter to H. Earle of Lancaster the like may be said of the office of Earle Marshall which descended by an heire female unto the house of Norfolk all which offices are unfit to be exercised by a woman as it is unfit for a woman to be summoned to the Parliament as a Baronesse by writ And many noble houses in England do support the dignity of Baronage unto them descended by women They which stand on the negative part of this controversie do encounter their adversaries on this manner viz. The writ of summons to the Parliament whereby the Baron by writ hath his originall is to call that honourable and worthy person so summoned to be one of the number of that right high and honourable Assembly and to be a Judge to sit heare and determine life and member plea and right of land if there shall come occasion likewise to give counsell and advice in the most weighty affaires of the Realme But these things are convenient for the quality of men unfitting and altogether unbeseeming the sexe of women Ergo having respect unto the finall purpose of such writs such inheritances should only descend unto the heire male and not unto the heire female Secondly if it shall be answered that although the heire female to whom such inheritance is descended be unfit in her owne person for the accomplishing of these things yet she may marry with one sufficiently able for her and in her behalf to execute the same this answer will neither satisfie nor salve the inconveniences For admit that such heire female were at full age at the death of her Ancestor unmarried it doth lie in her own choice who shall be her husband so shall the pleasure of the Soveraigne in the choice of his Councell in the great causes of the Realme be subject to the will of his subject in the choice of her husband which were altogether inconvenient Thirdly if such husband shall be called in the right of his wife the writ should make some mention hereof for otherwise it may well be taken that the husband was chosen in his own person and in behalfe of himselfe and not in regard of his wife or such pretended dignity descended unto him But there was never such writ of summons seen wherein the wife was mentioned and if the husband of such wife have been called to the Parliament which is alwayes by generall writ not mentioning his wife he is now made thereby a Baron of himself and in his own right by that writ Having thus heard both sides speak place doth now require to interpose opinion to compound this controversie This question or point is somewhat perplexed by means of difficult presidents for first it is observed that some presidents do prove that Baronies by writs have descended unto heires females whose husbands have beene called to the Parliament whether in regard of themselves or in regard of their wives it matters not But sure it is that the marriage of such Ladies gave them occasion so to be summoned and such husbands aâ—d their posterity have and do lawfully beare the same name of dignity which the Ancestors of such wife did before rightfully beare For by this controversie there is no purpose to call the right of such noble houses into question Howbeit secondly this is to be observed out of the presidents and to be acknowledged of every dutifull subject that the Kings Majesty is neverthelesse at liberty to call to the high Councell of Parliament whom his Highnesse shall in his Princely wisdom think most meet which his Majesties Progenitors have in former ages observed And therefore whereas Radulph Lord Cromwell being a Baron by writ died without issue having two sisters and coheirs Eliz. the eldest married to Sir Tho. Nevill Knight and Joan the younger married Sir Hunt Bourcher he who had married the younger sister was called to the Parliament as L. Cromwell and not the said Sir Tho. Nevill who had married the elder sister 3. It is to be observed that if a Baron by writ die without heire male having his daughter sister or other collaterall heire male that doth or can challenge the lands of the said Baron deceased by any ancient entaile or otherwise the title of such heire female hath bin hereâ—ofore allowed aâ— by the bonourable opinions and relations of the right honourable the late Commissioners in the office of Earle Marshall