one as for the excelleÌte giftes of God and nature in her most princelie appearinge ys vvorthie to inherite either this noble realme or any other be yt of muche more dignitie and worthines But nowe I claime nothinge for the vvorthines of the person whiche God forbidd shoulde be any thinge preiudiciall to the iuste title of others yf moste open and manifeste right Iustice and title do not coÌcurre with the worthines of the person Then lett the praise and Worthines remaine where yt ys And the right Where God and the lavve hathe placed yt But seinge God nature and the lavve dothe call the person to this expectation whose intereste and claime I do novve prosequute I meane the right excellente Ladie The Quene of Scots is the right heire appareÌte to the crovvne of Englande Ladie Marie Quene of Scotlande I hope that when her right and iuste title shall be throwghlie harde and considered by the indifferente Reader yf he be persvvaded alredie for her right he shall be more firmelie setled in his trevve and good opinion and that the other parties beinge of a contrarie minde shall finde good cavvses and grovvndes to remoue them from the same and to geaue ouer and yelde to the trevvthe Her graces title then yf God call our Souereigne ovvte of this transitorie life hauinge no issue of her maiesties bodye as yt ys moste open and euidende so yt ys moste conformable to the lavve of God of nature and of this realme And consequentlie in a manner of all other realmes in the vvorlde as grovvinge by the neareste proximitie of the royall bloude She ys a kinges and a Quenes davvghter her self a Quene Davvghter to the late kinge Iames of Scotlande sonne to ladie Margarett the eldest sister to our late Souereigne kinge Henrie the eight Whose Davvghter also the ladie Lenoux ys but by a later husbande The ladie Frances late vvyfe to Henry Marques dorsett aftervvarde Duke of Suffoocke And the ladie Elenour late vvyfe to the Erle of Cumberlande and theire progenye procedethe from the ladie Marie dowager of France yongest sister of the saide kinge Henrie late vvife to Charles Brandon Duke of Suffolke I might here fetche forthe olde farne dayes I might reache backe to the noble and vvorthie kinges longe before the conqueste of vvhose royall bloude she ys discended vvhiche ys no parte of our purpose neither dothe enforce her title more then to proue her no stranger vvithin this realme But the argumentes and proufes which vve meane to alleage and bringe forthe for the confirmation of her right and title in succession as heire apparente to the crovvne of Englande are gathered and grovvnded vpon the lavves of God and nature and not onlie receaued in the ciuill pollicies of other nations but also in the olde lawes and customes of our ovvne contrey by reason approued and by vse and longe concontinevvance of time obserued from the firste constitution of this realme in politicall order vnto this presente daye And yet for all that hathe yt bene aÌd yet ys by some men attempted artificiallie to obiecte and caste manie mistie darke clovvdes before meÌnes eyes to kepe from them yf yt maye be the cleare light of the saide iuste title the vvhiche they vvolde extingvvishe or at the leaste blemishe withe some obscure shadovve of lavve But in deede against the lavve and vvith the shadovve of parliameÌts But in deede against the trewe meaninge of the pliameÌtes And albe it yt were inowghe for vs our cawse beinge so firmelie aÌd suerlie established vpoÌ all good reason aÌd lawe to stande at defence and onlie to auoide as easelie vve maye theire obiections Whiche principallie and cheifelie are grovvnded vpon the common lawes and statutes of this realme yet for the betteringe aÌd strengtheninge of the same vve shall laye forthe sondrie greate aÌd inuincible reasons coÌioyned vvithe good and sufficieÌt aucthoritie of the lawe so approued and coÌfirmed that the aduersaries shall neuer be able iustlie to impugne them And so that vve truste after the readinge of this our treatise aÌd the effectes of the same vvell digested no manner of scruple owght to remaine in any indiferent mans harte concerninge her right and title Whose expectatioÌ aÌd coÌscience althovvghe we truste fullie in this discourse to satisfie aÌd doubte nothinge in the vvorlde of the rightfulnes of our cause Yet must we nedes coÌfesse the maÌner aÌd forme to eÌtreate therof to be full of difficultie aÌd êplexitie For suche causes of Princes as they be seldome and rare so ys yt more rare and stange to finde them discoursed discussed and determined by any lawe or statute Albe it nowe and then some statutes tende that vvaye Neither do our lavves not the corps of the Romaine and ciuill lavve lightlie medle With the princely gouernemente but vvith priuate mens causes And yet this not withstandinge for the better iustifiengè of our cavvse albe yt I denye not but that by the coÌmon lavve yt muste be knovven vvho ovvght to haue the crovvne And that the coÌmon lavve muste discerne the right aswell of the crowne as of subiects Yet I saye that there ys a greate difference betvvene the kinges right aÌd the right of others And that the title of the crovvne of this realme ys not subiecte to the rules and principles of the coÌmon lavve of this realme as to be ruled and tried after suche order and course as the inheritance of priuate personnes ys by the same The coÌmoÌ lavve of this realme ys rather grouÌded vpon a generall custome then any lawe written For the prouf wherof let vs consider What the comon lavve of this rerealme ys and howe the rules therof be grownded and do take place Yt ys verie manifeste and plaine that the comon lawe of this realme of Englande ys no lawe WritteÌ but grovvnded onlie vppoÌ a coÌmon and generall custome throvvghe ovvte the vvhole realme as apparethe by the treatise of the aunciente and famous vvriter vpon the lavves of the realme named RANVLPHVS DE GLANVILLA In êlogo suo eâsdeÌ libri fol. 1. 2. Who wrote in the time of the noble kinge Henrie the secoÌde De dicto Ranulpbo Glanuilla vide GeralduÌ CaÌbreÌsem in Topogra de vvallia of the lavve and custome of the realme of englande Beinge then and also in the time of the reigne of kinge Richarde the first the cheif counsailler and iustice of the same kinge And also by the famous Iustice Fortescue in his booke which he wrote beinge Chancellour of Englande Fortescue de laud legum Angliae ca. 17 De laudibus legum Angliae And by 33 H. 6 51. and by 8. E. 4. 19. Which custome by vsage and coÌtinuall practise heretofore had in the kinges covvrtes vvithin this realme ys onlie knovven and mainteined 8. E. 4 19 33. H. 6 51 piÌsoÌs printe Wherein we seame muche agreable to the olde lacedemoniaÌs vvho manie hundred yeares past most politikelie and famouselie gouerned theire common
c. Possessio fratris beiÌge gnÌrall Neither hathe bene or caÌ be stretched to the inheritaÌce of the croune for the brother of the half bloud shall succede aÌd not the sister of the vvhole bloud as maye appeare by Iustice Moile aÌd â 34 H 6. 58. Red. printe maie be êued by kinge Etheldred brother aÌd successor to kinge Edwarde the Martyr and by kinge Edvvarde the confessour brother to Kinge EdmuÌde aÌd diuers others who succeded in the crovvne of EnglaÌde beinge but of the halfe bloud As vvas also the late Quene Marie aÌd ys at this present our gratious Souereigne Elizabethe Who bothe in all recordes of our lavve vvherin theire seuerall rightes and titles to the crovvne are pleaded as by daylie experience asvvell in the exchequer al also in all other covvrtes ys manifeste do make theire conueiance as heires in bloude the one to the other vvhiche yf they vvere coÌmon or priuate persones they coulde not be allovved in lavve they as ys vvell knowen beinge of the half bloude one to the other Nor that the executour shall haue the goodes and chatelle of the testatour that ys to vvitt begotten of one father but borne of sondrie mothers Yt ys also a generall rule in the lavve that the executours shall haue the goodes aÌd chattelles of the testatour and not the heire aÌd yet ys yt othervvise in the case of the crovvne for there the successor shall haue them and not the executour as appearethe in 7 H. 4 by Gascoine 7 H. 4. fo 43 11 H. 4 9. Yt ys likevvise a generall rule that a man Attainted of felonie or treason his heire throwghe the corruption of bloude Nor that a traitour is vnhable to take land by disceÌt withoute pardon vvithoute pardon and restitutioÌ of bloude ys vnable to take any landes by discente Which rule althowghe yt be generall yet yt extendethe not to the discente or succession of the crovvne althovvghe the same Attainder were by acte of êliameÌte as maie appeare by the Attainder of Richarde Duke of yorke and kinge Edvvarde his sonne and also of kinge Henrie the seaueÌthe whoe were attainted by acte of parliamente and never restored and yet no dishabilitie thereby vnto Edvvarde the fovvrethe nor vnto Henry the seaventhe to receave the crovvne by lavvfull succession But to thys you wolde seame to ansvvere in your saide booke saienge that Henry the seaventhe not vvithstandinge hys Attainder came to the crowne as cast vpon him by the order of the lawe For as muche that vvhen the crovvne vvas caste vpoÌ him that dishabilitie ceased Wherein ye confesse directlie that the Attainder ys no dishabilitie at all to the successioÌ of the crovvne For althovvghe no dishabilitie can be alleaged in him that hathe the crovvne in possession yet yf there vvere any dishabilitie in him before to receaue and take the same by lavvfull succession then muste ye saie that he vvas not lavvfull kinge but an vsurper And therefore in confessinge Henrye the seaventhe to be a lavvfull kinge and that the crovvne vvas lavvfullie caste vpon hym ye confesse directlie thereby that before he Was kinge in possession there vvas no dishabilitie in hym to take the crovvne by lavvfull succession hys saide Attainder not vvith standinge Whiche ys as muche as I vvolde vvishe you to graunte But in conclusion vnderstandinge your self that this your reason can not mainteine your intente you go abovvte an other vvaye to helpe your selfe An ansvvere to the aduersarie makiÌge a difference betwene attaiÌder the birthe ovvte of the alleageance makinge a difference in the lavve betvvene the case of Attainder and the case of forren birthe ovvte of the kinges alleagance sainge that in the case of the Attainder necessitie dothe enforce the succession of the crovvne vpon the partie attainted For othervvise ye saie the crovvne shall not descende to anye But vpon the birthe ovvte of the kinges allegeance ye saie yt ys othervvise And for prouf therof ye put a case of I. S. beinge seased of landes and havinge issevve A and B. A ys attainted in the life of I. S. his father and after I. S. diethe A livinge vnrestored Novve the lande shall not descende either to A or B. But shall goe to the lorde of the fee by vvaye of eschete Othervvise yt had bene ye saie yf A had bene borne beyonde the sea I S. breakinge his allegeance to the kinge and after I S. cometh againe into the realme aÌd hathe issevve B. and diethe for novve ye saie B. shall inherite hys fathers landes Yf the crowne had bene holden of any person to whom yt might haue escheted as in your case of I S. the lande did Then paraduenture there had bene some affinitie betwene your saide case and the case of the crowne But there ys no suche matter Besides that ye muste consider that the kinge cometh to the crovvne not onlie by discente but also and cheifelie by succession as vnto a corporation And therefore ye might easelie haue sene a difference in your cases betvvene the kinges Maiestie and I S. a subiecte And also betwene landes holden of a lorde above and the crowne holden of no earthlie lorde but of God almightie onlie But yet for argumentes sake I wolde faine knowe vvhere you finde your difference aÌd vvhat aucthoritie you can shevve for the proof therof Ye haue made no marginall note of any aucthoritie And therefore vnlesse ye also saie that ye are Pythagoras I will not beleve your difference Well I am assuered that I can shewe you good aucthoritie to the contrarie And that there ys no difference in your cases Pervse I praie you 22. H. 6. and there maye you see the opinioÌ of Iustice NewtoÌ 22. H. â fol. 43. that there ys no difference in your cases but that in bothe your cases the lande shall eschete vnto the lorde And Prisote beinge then of counsaile vvith the partie that claimed the landes by a discente Where the eldeste sonne vvas borne beyonde the seas durste not abide in lavve vpon that title This aucthoritie ys againste your difference and this aucthoritie I am well assuerid ys better then any that you haue shewed to proue your difference But yf We shall admitt your difference to be accordinge to the lavve yet your cases Whervnto you applye your differeÌce are nothiÌge like as I have saiede before But to procede on in the proof of our purpose as yt dothe appeare The supposed maxime of the adâsaries tovchethe not kinges borne beyoÌde the sea as appeareth by kinge Stephen and kiÌge H. 2. that neither the kiÌge nor his crovne ys bownde by theys general rules which before I haue shevved So do I like wise saie of all the residewe of the generall rules aÌd maximes of the lawe beinge in a maÌner infinite But to retorne againe vnto your onlie supposed Maxime whiche you make so generall coÌcerninge the dishabilitie of persoÌs borne beyonde the seas yt ys verie plaine
became I praye you of Harolde that by briberie aÌd helpe of his kiÌred vsurped the crowne against the foresaide yonge Eadgar as I haue saide aÌd as the olde monumeÌrs of our historiopraphers do plainlie testifie was the trewe aÌd lawful hâire Cui de iure debebatÌ regnuÌ Anglo ruÌ Io. âod in chronic Angliae Coulde he thincke you enioye his ambitiouse aÌd nawghtie vsurpinge one whole aÌd eÌtier yeare No suerlie eare the first yeare of his vsurped reigne turned aboute he was spoyled aÌd turned owt bothe of crovne aÌd â Rex Edvvardê° misit c. Vt velâpÌe Edvvardê° vel filiae eâê° sibi succedereÌt c. Rich. Cicest vid vvil Malmesb de regi Ang. l. 2. c. 45. l. 3. cap. 5. his lief with all FadeÌ verba sunt in Mat. vvestmo 1Ì flor hist Anâo 1066. Yea his vsurpatioÌ occasioÌed the coÌqueste of the whole realme by williaÌ Duke of NormaÌdie bastarde Sonne to Roberte the sixte duke of the same And maye we thincke all saufe aÌd sownde nowe from like danger yf vve shoulde treade the saide vvroÌge steppes vvithe Harolde forsakinge the right aÌd highe vvaye of lavve aÌd iustice What shall I nowe speake of the crevvell aÌd ciuill vvarres betvvene kinge Stephen and kinge HeÌrie the secoÌde Which vvarres rose by reasoÌ the saide HeÌry vvas vniustlie kepte froÌ the crovne devë to his mother mavvde aÌd to him aftervvardes The petifull reigne of the saide IohnÌ vvho doth not lamente vvith the lamentable losse of Normandie Aquitanie and the possibilitie of the Dukedome of Britanie What cala mities fell to this real me by the vsurpiÌg of kinge Harrold K. Stephen and IohnÌ aÌd vvith the losse of our other goodlie possessions in Fraunce Wherof the crovvne of Englande vvas robbed and spoiled by the vnlavvfull vsurpinge of him againste his nephevve Arthur Well let vs leaue theys greauouse and lothsome remembrances and lett vs yet seake yf vve maye fynde any later interpretation either of the saide statute or rather of the coÌmon lavve for our purpose And lôa the greate goodnes and êuidence of God vvho hathe yf the foresaide exaÌples wolde not serue prouided a later but so good so sure so apte and mete interpretation for our cause as any reasonable harte maye desier The interpretation directlie tovvchethe our case vvhiche I meane by the mariage of the Ladye Margaret eldest davvghter to kinge HeÌrie the seaveÌthe vnto Iames the fowrthe kinge of Scotlande and by the opinion of the saide most prudente Prince in bestowinge his saide dawghter into Scotlande A matter sufficieÌt inoughe to ouerthrowe all those cauellinge inuentions of the aduersarie For what time kinge Iames the fowerth senâe his ambassadour to kinge Henrie the seauenthe to obteine his good vvill to espouse the saide Ladie Margaret Polid. 26. there were of his counsaile not ignorante of the lawes and customes of the realme Kinge H. vvith his cownsaile ys a good interpÌtour of our present cause that did not vvell like vppon the saide mariage sayenge yt might so fall ovvte that the right aÌd title of the crovvne might be deuolued to the Ladie Margaret and her children And the realme thereby might be subiecte to Scotlande To the vvhich the prudente and wise kinge ansvvered that in case any suche deuolution shoulde happen yt vvolde be nothinge preiudiciall to Englande For Englande as the cheif and principall and worthieste parte of the Isle shoulde drawe Scot lande to yt as yt did Normandie from the time of the coÌqueste vvhiche ansvvere was vvonderfullie vvell liked of all the counsaile And so coÌsequentlie the mariage toke effecte as appearethe by Polidor the historiogropher of this realme And suche a one as vvrote the actes of the time by the instructioÌ of the kinge him self I saye theÌ the vvise worthy SalomoÌ foreseinge that suche deuolutioÌ might happen was an interpretatour with his prudent and sage consayle for our cause for eles they neaded not to reasoÌ of any suche subiection to Scotlande Yf the children of the Ladye Margaret might not lavvfullie inherite the crovvne of Englande For as to her husbande vve coulde not be subiecte hauinge him self no right by this mariage to the title of the crovvne of this realme Where vpon I maye well inferre that the saide nevve maxime of theis men whereby they wolde rule and ouer rule the succession of Princes was not knowen to the saide wise kinge neither to any of his counsaile Or yf yt were yet was yt taken not to reache to hys bloudd royall borne in Scotlande And so on everie side the title of Quene Marye ys assuerid So that nowe by this that we haue saide yt maye easelie be seen by what light and âklender consideration the adversarie hathe gone abowte to straine the wordes Enfants or childreÌ to the first degre onlie Of the like weight ys his other consideration imageninge aÌd surmisinge this statute to be made by cawse the kinge had so manye occasions to be so often over the sea vvith his spowse the Quene As thowghe diuers kinges before him vsed not often to passe over the seas As thowghe this were a personall statute made of speciall purpose and not to be taken as a declaration of the coÌmon lawe Whiche to saie ys moste directlie repugnaÌte and contrarious to the letter of the saide statute Or as thowghe his children also did not verie often repayre to owterwarde contreies as IohnÌ of Gawnte Duke of Lancaster Polid Polychr Froserd that Maried Peters the kinge of castilles eldest dawghter by whose right he claimed the crovne of castill as his brother Edmunde The mariages of k. E. 3. sones Erle of camebridge that maried the yongeste dawghter as lionell Duke of clarence that maried at Millain Violane Dawghter and heire to Galiatius Duke of Millan But especiallie Prince Edwarde whiche most victoriouslie toke in battaile IohnÌ the Frenche kinge and browght hym into Englande his prisoner to the greate triumphe and reioicinge of the realme whose eldest sonne Edwarde that died in shorte time after was borne beyonde the seas in Gascoigne and his other sonne Richarde that succeded hys grandfather was borne at Burdeauxe As theis noble kinge Edwardes sonnes Married withe forrainers So did theye giue ovvte theire dawghters in Mariage to forraine Princes As the Duke of Lancaster his dawghter Philippe to the kinge of Portingale and his dawghter Katherin to the Kinge of Spaine And his nece IohaÌ dawghter to his sonne Erle of Somersett was ioined in mariage to the Kinge of Scottes IohaÌ dawghter to his brother Thâ mas of Wodstocke Duke of GloÌcester was Quene of Spaine And his other dawghter Marie Duches of Bretaigne Nowe by thys mans interpretation none of the issewe of all theis noble womeÌ coulde have enioyed the crowne of Englande wheÌ yt had fallen to them thowghe they had bene of the neareste royall bloudd after the deathe of theire Auncesters Which suerlie had bene against the auncientâ presidentes and examples that we