Selected quad for the lemma: son_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
son_n	begin_v	king_n	reign_v	13,807	5	9.8575	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A16969	A defence of the booke entitled A co[n]cent of Scripture for amendment of former Atheian most grosse, and Iudaique errours, which our translations and notes had: against the libel, scoffing a Scottish mist: and slaundering that the Iewes epistle sent from Byzantian Rome, was a forged worke, and not in deed sent thence. By Hugh Broughton.	Broughton, Hugh, 1549-1612.	1609 (1609)	STC 3858; ESTC S114309	15,638	34

the worlde admire the new Testament as I shewed in my advertisement and in a Disputation in the Martialcie against the Rhemistes who translated the new Testament from the Latin saying that the Greeke was corrupted Bancroftes vnthankefulnes Bar. Lo. in his Libell against the Scottish mist and Brittish Nation forged with a Giddie headed slaūder a most senseles lye that I disputed in defence of the Lxx. which none ever defended to bee well copied yet Bancroft conspired with the vnlearned vngratefull shamelesse Libeller to allow the traitorous Athean worke of a most impudent slaunderer foming out his owne shame as the raging waves of the sea preparing him selfe a lodging in gloomie darknes Article V. A fayning that Baasa King of Israell fought against Asa tenne yeares after he was dead IN the third yeare of Asa Baasa began his reigne of 24. yeares 1. King 15.33 Now he must die in the 26. of Asa by this true scripture Bancroft his croft of bane by barbarous rudenes that knew not Malc●th to meane there a kingdome not reigne 1. Chron. 16.1 Thus goeth Bancrofts allowed learning in the 36. yeare of Asa came Baasa King of Israell against Iuda 2. Chron. 10.1 It was the 36. since the kingdome of Asa was devided from Israell twentie yeares before Asa reigned as my Concent noted with an evident title Iuda or Asaes Kingdome D. Bancroft was rude that knew not the generall name Sequell So Baasa came ten yeares dead to fight by Bancroftes allowed divinitie by as good Machmad the foule spirit may be hoped to returne to his deceaved Knightes It is straunge that a D. and bearing G. in title should after warning suffer such stuffe to be solde vnder the name of the Bible Article VI. Farre greater Atheismes are allowed by the learned D. and most Reverend F. about Ochozias sonne to King Ioram IOram was thirtie and twoo yeares olde when he began to reigne and he reigned eight yeres in Ierusalem so he died aged 40. yeares And Ochozias his sonne reigned in his stead two and twentie yeares old was Ochozias when hee began to reigne and he reigned one yeare in Ierusalem and his mothers name was Athalia the grand daughter of Omry so when he reigned he fell into the yeare 42. of Omries house rooted out by Iehu And perished Ben of that 42. yeares falling into their Lot as oftentimes meaneth Gods iudgement shewed in time to be termed Time Apoc. 11.12 How Bancroftes vnskilfulnes for Ben vsuall for any Lot taking it for age alloweth Ochozias to be elder then his father by two yeares and twentie yeares elder then him selfe Bancroft alloweth this translation as having Gods authoritie from the Ebrew fortie and two yeares olde was Achozias when he began to reigne 2. Chro. 22.2 Now his Father died at 40. 2. Chro. 20.20 and 2. King 8.17 and he reigned at 22. 2. Kin. 8. 26. and reigned but one yeare for he was kild so by D. Bancroft his divinitie he was two yeares elder then his father and twentie elder then himselfe and reigned when he had been dead twentie yeares M. Iacks told D. still at Hadley of this aboue 22. yeres agoe Another allowance of as Giddiheaded a Smitherie in the margent note vpon 2. Chro. 22.2 It is to be noted that he reigned 20. yeares with his father yet living His Father reigned but eight yeares in all so by Bancrofts Arithmetique he should reigne twelve yeares before his father Besides this nothing helpeth to shew how he is not two yeres elder then his Father All this the booke of Concent opened of old but hogges care not for pearles Grunting in a reuting libell will be their grace Of a most wicked note allowed by D. Bancroft to the overthrow of the Gospell the note is prefixed to Saint Mathewes Gospell Thus it standeth The posteritie of Sollomon left in Ochozias wherby the kingdome was transported to the line of Ioas sonne to Iuda The bane of this banned croft Iewes sweare that Bancroft and all that would teach against their native iudgement for the storie of the Kings that Ioas was not the sonne of Ochozias and all to Iechonias were of Salomon such were shameles Atheistes and no Graecian ever denyed that And all ages have allowed Iosephus in this that Salomons house held on to Iechonias The Giddiheadines of this forged smithery is so more contemptuous of God in that Ioas is six times termed the son to Ochozias in as plaine tokens of propertie as ever any was called sonne to his father A D. of grace should not allowe the Kings storie to bee so contemned And twentie yeares agoe I wrote in my Concent enough to haue taught anie man of grace the trueth of this poinct But D. Bancroftes libeller against Archb. Whitg and Bishop Wintons Syllogisme for the Creede to meane a going vp to Paradise in the Godly thought that booke to be atormēt for his vnlearned soule and Bancroft allowed the Lunatique libell against the Brittish nation from the slyme of a Fishemongers spawne that God reserved him to a most iust reproofe for most detestable dotage not so much from olde yeares as from olde contempt of trueth God doth nothing but he telleth his servantes the Prophetes as when hee meant to end Salomons house in Iechonias he sware to Ieremie it should so fall out and bad him proclaime it to all the earth But he tolde no ending in Ochozia but cleane contrarie six times a continuance There a D. of any grace besides his title should not allow such gracelesse Divinitie to the overthrow of Saint Matthew and Ieremie in the Kings storie and Ezra for the Chronicles and of Saint Luke as giving wicked Ioas a name never given him without any token of being otherwise called But I haue written sufficiently of this in the treatise of our L. Familie whereof I haue sent 250. copies to Archbish Bancroft with 50. commentaries vpon the Lamentations to bestowe on what Preachers he will at his owne price Article VII Of his breeding the Gospell high contempt touching Governours In the table of Davids house touched afore this also is allowed RHesa governed 66. yeares Iohanna fiftie yeares and others in their portions No Iew ever heard that any of these governed one houre So should these set before the Gospell make Iewes thinke the Gospell is not true Nowe that Iewes desire to be taught such trappes should be remooved and not allowed by a D. of Grace Article VIII Of a Iudaisme invented by wicked Iewes to overthrow the Gospell and confusion of the Kings storie Thus the Iewes reason The true Redeemer of the world redeemeth in a Iubilae that they gather most learnedly from Levit. 25. as in Zohar vpon that place and Rimchi affirmeth it vpon Ezek. 4. where he would haue the 25. yeare of his captivitie and 14. after the citie was stroken to be the Iubilie and to containe a vision of Messias that should redeeme in a Iubilee The latter is true That Messias redeemed in a Iubilee