from an auncestor a Subject but not where it discends from an auncestor who was King except in speciall cases 3. The issues of the King at the time of the levying of the fine are subjects therefore within the Statute and it seemd to them that there ought to be Letters Patents to give power to the Conisee to enter into the Land Nevills Case 2. Jacobi fo 33. THe dignity of an Earle intailed is forfeitable for treason 1. Resolved this is within the Statute of W. 2. De donis and experience is to give dignities in taile with remainders over also this was an office anciently and offices may be intailed 2. A dignity may be forfeited at the common Law by a condition in Law for the Office of Earle was Ad consulendum Regem tempore pacis defendendum Regem tempore belli therefore he forfeits it when he takes Councell and Armes against him 3. If it were not forfeited by the common Law yet it is by 26. H. 8. cap. 13. by this word Hereditament and the words use or possession which are added are to shew that every Hereditament shall be forfeited at the common Law Donee in taile had Potestatem alienandi post prolem suscitatam but if hee reteine the Land himselfe he hath no absolute fee for none shall inherit but the heire Per formam doni so it is now in case of annuity and other things out of the Statute Penall Statutes 2. Ja. fo 36. WHen a Statute is made by Parliament the King cannot give the penalty benefit or dispensation of the same to any Subject but the King may make a Non obstante to dispense with any perticular person that he shall not incurre the penalty of a Stature and the King after a forfeiture or penalty of a Statute by judgement and recovery may grant the same to any of his Subjects by way of reward and all the Judges of England subscribed to this the 8. Day of November 1604. Lillingstons Case 5. Jacobi fo 38. TEnant in fee grants a rent charge proviso that the person of the grantor shall not be charged the grantee acknowledgeth a recognizance according to 23. H. 8. and after releaseth to the grantor the conisee sueth an extent and brings debt against the grantor Terretenant 1. Resolved the rent is extendable for notwithstanding the release it is In esse as to the Conisee and cannot be discharged by the act of the Conisor also the extent relateth to the judgement at which time it was extendable See the Lord Aburgavenies Case in the sixth Report 2. Debt lyeth not so long as the extent indureth for so long the rent hath continuance although that by the release the freehold be determined if a rent charge be granted for life with proviso as above-said if the rent be determined debt lyeth against the grantor because he had no other remedy Bedels Case 5. Jacobi fo 40. R. B. Covenants in consideration of paternall love c. to stand seised to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to his Wife for life the remainder over 1. Resolv although the consideration in the deed runneth not to the Wife yet another consideration may be averred which stands with the Deed. The limittation of an use to the Wife importeth a consideration in it selfe so if it be to any of his blood but if he Covenant in consideration of a 100. l. to stand seised to the use of his Sonne nothing passeth untill inrollment Quia expressum facit cessare tacitum Beresfords Case 5. Jacobi fo 41. AN use is limitted to A B. and of the heires Males of the said A. lawfully begotten this is fee taile notwithstanding the words of the Body be wanting and that lawfully begotten are implied for no heire shall inherit who is not lawfully begotten Resolved that to create an inheritance the word Heires is necessary but the words De corpore are not necessary to make an estate taile if there be words which Tantamount and here the sence according to the intent of the Donor is of or by the said A. lawfully begotten A gift to a man haeredibus de se exeuntibus or Haeredibus suis de prima uxore sua are estates taile Kenns Case 4. Jacobi fo 42. C. K. had issue by E. S. M. K. and they are divorced and the Marriage sentenced void C. K. marrieth F. they have issue E. K. C. dyeth E. K. is found by office to be Heire M. and W. her Baron preferre a bill in the Court of wards to traverse the Office to which the Committees of the wardship answer one of the Committees dyeth M. and W. sue a Bill of Reviver and M. having issue E. dyeth E. her issue and R. her Baron bring a new Bill of Reviver 1. Resolved so long as the sentence stands in force the issue of the first feme is a Bastard because the spirituall Judge hath jurisdiction thereof and our Law giveth faith unto it Sentence of divorse may be repealed after the death of the parties but no divorse can be after their dearh for that will Bastardise the issue and the Court of the King hath triall of it originally not being hindered by any Sentence 2. The Plaintiffe shall not have a traverse without an office found for her for the King being sure of wardship shall not be ousted by one before that he be sure to have benefit by him and 2. E. 6. cap 8. doth not extend to give a traverse without office but if by two offices two are found Heires whereof one is within age by that Statute the other may traverse immediatly 3. A bill of reviver upon a bill of reviver shall not be suffered for the infinitnesse no more then a Writ by Journeys accompts By all the last bill was absurd which prayeth that the first bill be revived because M. was dead but it ought to be that her Heire may traverse The End of the Seaventh Booke THE EIGHTH BOOK The Princes Case 3. Jacobi in Chancery fo 1. THE Queene 37. Eliz. grants three Mannors parcell of the Duchee of C. to H. L. and G. M. the King at the supplication of the Prince brings a Scire facias against the said H. L. and S.H. to make Livery to the Prince by force of the Statute of 11. E. 3. H. L. pleads Null tielum recorde S. H. pleads the Patents with a Non obstante 32. H. 8. whereby these Mannors were made parcell of c. and the Act of Confirmation 43. Eliz. As to the plea of H. L. the Atturney sheweth an Inspeximus and demurreth upon the plea of the other two who joyne and as Amici curiae repeate part of the Statute of 1. H. 7. touching the Duchie H. L. demurreth 1. Resolv the Charter of creation of the Prince Duke of C. 11. E. 3. is an Act of Parliament for such a limittation to the first-begotten Son is void without Statute for if Grandfather King the Father Duke and Sonne be if
a restraint against any particular person in certeine Vpon a Feoffement without warranty the Feoffee shall have all the Charters which comprize warranty and others though they be not given to him because hee is to defend the Title at his perill Upon a Feoffement with warranty without expresse grant the Feoffee shall not have any Charters which serve for to deraigne the warranty paramount Also the Feoffer shall have all Charters which serve for maintenance of the Title but the Feoffee shall have all which maintaine the possession as Court Rolls and which are concomitant and incident to the possession If A. be seized of a Segniorie rent advowson or other thing that lyeth in grant and grant the same over unto B. with warranty and B. grant that to C. with warranty In this case C. shall have the first deed although B. be bound to warrantie for without that he cannot make any Defence against A. or any claiming by him Pelhams Case 32. El. fo 14. A Tenant for life the remainder in Taile the remainder in fee bargaines and sells the Land to one who before the Statute of 14. El. ca. 8. suffers a recoverie in which A. is vouched and voucheth over and he in remainder enters and the entry is adjudged lawfull for the Recovery is a Forfeiture and the remainder may enter for it is the common Assurance As if Tenant for life had levied a Fine c. and suing of execution doth not toll the entry of the remainder and a Writ of error was sued and the plaintiffe release the errors Porters Case 35. El. fo 22. 32. H. 8. P. devised a house to his wife and her heires upon condition that she by advise c. with all convenient speed after his death should assure it c. for maintenance of a Free School c. for ever and dyes 32. H. 8. the wife enters and 3. E. 6. leases to A. for yeares the heire of P. enters and his entry adjudged lawfull because 23. H. 8. extends not to good uses nor doth it make the conveyance voyd or give entry but makes the use voyd and admit the use voyd yet the condition is not for Counsell may devise c. as to have a Corporation by Pattent and licence to assure and therefore the wife ought to have performed it Any man at this day may give Lands Tenements or hereditaments to any person or persons for the finding of a Preacher maintenance of a Schoole maimed Soulders poore people reparation of Churches High-wayes Bridges marriage of poore maids or any other charitable uses But it is good policy in every such Feoffment or estate to reserve to the Feoffor and his heires any small rent or to expresse some small summe of money for the consideration of the cause before recited Altonwoods Case 42. Eliz. fo 41. H. 8. seised of an estate Taile to him and the heires males of his body and of a Fee expectant grants in Taile and dyes without issue male adjuded that the grant is voyd for the King had an estate Taile in possession by which he might grant a lawfull estate for his own life and a Fee by which he might grant an estate Taile by speciall recitall And these words ex speciali gratia c. shall not produce a strainable construction against the rules of Law or in deceptionem regis Capells Case 23. Eliz. fo 62. A Tenant in Taile the remainder to B. in Taile B. grants a rent charge A. suffers a common recovery and dyes without issue the grantee distraines the Alienee of A. brings a Replevin adjudged for the alienee by all the Justices of England that a common recoverie against a Tenant in Tayle shall binde not onely the remainder and all Leases charges c. granted or made by him in remainder but also the Reversion and all Leases charges c. granted by him in reversion Archers Case 39. 40. Eliz. fo 66. LAnd was devised to the Father for life the remainder to the next heire male of the Father and to the heires males of his body the devisor dyes the Father infeoffes J. S. with warranty First it was resolved by Anderson and Walmeslowe et tot Cur. that the Father had but onely an estate for life for that he had an expresse estate for life demised unto him and the remainder is limitted to his next heire male in the singular number and his right heire male may not enter for the forfeiture in his life for he cannot be heire so long as he liveth Secondly It was resolved that the remainder to his right heire is a good remainder although he cannot have a right heire during his life but it sufficeth that it vesteth eo instanti that the particular estate determineth Dyer 14. Eliz. fo 309. Thirdly it was resolved which was the principall poynt in this case per tot Curiam that by the Feoffment of the Tenant for life the remainder was destroyed for every contingent remainder ought to vest either during the particular estate or at the least eo instanti that the particular estate determineth for if the particular estate be ended or determined in Deed or in Law before the contingency fall the remainder is voyd And in this case by the Feoffment of the Father his estate for life was determined by condition in Law which cannot be revived by any possibilitie for this cause the contingent remainder is voyd for by the Feoffment no right of the particular estate remaineth and the better opinion was that the warranty bindes the remainder though in Abeyance Bredons Case 39 40. Eliz Fol. 76. TEnant for life and the remainder in Taile joyne in a fine Come ceo c. to A. who renders a Rent charge of 40. l. a yeare to Tenant for life the remainder dies without issue the second remainder in taile enters Tenant for life distraines for the Rent adjudged he may and that the rent remaines after the death of Tenant in taile without issue during the life of Tenant for life the fine was no discontinuance for every one gave that which he might lawfully give and t is no forfeiture by Tenant for life for the Law construes this First to be a grant of him in remainder and after the grant of Tenant for life Vt res magis valeat c. If Tenant for life and the first remainder in Taile make a feoffement t is no discontinuance though the first remainder in taile dies without issue nor is it a forfeiture but the feoffee shall hold it during the life of Tenant for life but if it be without deed then t is a surrender of Tenant for life and the feoffement of the remainder Vt res magis valeat c. Corbets Case 42. Eliz Fol. 84. of Perpetuities C. Covenants to stand seised to the use of himselfe for life and after to the use of A. his Eldest Son and the Heires Males of his body the remainder to the use of B. his second Son and the
Heires Males of his Body c. And if A. or his issue c. shall attempt c. to alien c. by which any estate shall be barred c. that after such attempt and before any act executed the use and Estate of him so attempting c. shall cease onely as to him so attempting in the same degree as if he were naturally dead and not otherwise and that then it shall be immediately to such persons to whom it should come by the intent of the Indenture c. C. dyes A. suffers a recovery B. enters c. adjudged he could not for this proviso is repugnant impossible and against Law for the death of Tenant in taile is not a cesser of the Estate taile but death without issue Males and by this reason the issue should have it in the life of the Father c. And for every discent c. Death naturall or civill is requisite and t is not materiall though Tenant in taile had no issue at the time of the breach for t was repugnant at the beginning and the estate taile doth not commence by the having of issue and a gift in taile upon condition that if the Donee dyes his estate shall cease is a void condition Also the proviso is void for the incertainty as a gift to two Et haeredibus is voide though a Warranty be made to them and their Heirs in Jermine Arscotts Case the like proviso was adjudg'd voide for be the proviso a condition or a limitation the intire estate ought to be defeated by it and an Estate in Land cannot cease for part and continue for the residue nor cease for one person and continue for another nor cease for a time and revive after The like judgement was betwixt Chomly and Humble but the Parliament or Law may make an estate voide as to one and good to another as Tenant in speciall taile levies a fine the issue is barred not the wife so a release by the demandant to the vouchee is good not by a stranger so if an Executor surrender a tearme to one respect t is extinct to another t is assetts c. And uses are within the Statute De donis though it speakes onely of Lands and Tenements and there shall be a Possessio fratris c. of them for they are guided by the Rules of the common Law Richill in the time of R. 2. and Thirning in the time of H. 4. Justices intended for to make a perpetuity but could not Shelleyes Case 23. Eliz Fol. 94. EDward Shelley leased for yeares and after Covenanted to suffer a recovery which should be to the use of himselfe and after to the use of A. for 24. yeares and after to the Heires Males of the body of the said E S. and the Heires Males of the said Heires Males c. E. S. dyes 9 of Octob. the first day of the Terme in the morning betwixt five and six a clock the recovery passes the same day and an Habere facias seisinam awarded the recovery was executed the 19 of Octob. 4 Decemb. the Wife of the Eldest Son before dead of E. S. was delivered of a Son named Henry Richard the second Son of E. S. entered and made a Lease c. Henry entred upon the Lessee who brought an Eject firmae and Judgement was given for the Defendant and t was resolved that if Tenant in taile suffer a common recovery and dye before execution that execution may be sued against the issue for the intended recompence in favour of the common assurance resolved that the revertion in judgement of Law is not in the recoveror before execution sued for the judgement is Quod recuperet seisinam which cannot be executed till entry or claime as 't is of a Common c. granted upon condition for when a man may enter or claime the Law will not put things in him till entry or claime The third and great point resolved was that the Uncle is in as by discent though he shall not have his age nor be in ward 1. Because the recovery being the Originall act had its Essence in the life of E. S. to which the execution hath retrospect 2. Because the use might have vested in E. S. if he were in life 3. Neither the recoverors by their entry nor the Sheriffe by making execution may make an Inheritance to whom they please 4. Because the Uncle claimed the use by the recovery and Indenture and by words of limitation not purchase Albanies Case 28. Eliz Fo. 111. A By Indenture infeoffed B. of two Acres to the use of A. for life the remainder in taile to C. the remainder in fee to D. with a proviso if E. dye without issue that A. at any time by indenture sealed c. in the presence of foure c. may alter c. any use c. A. of the one acre infeoffes F. and for the other Acre A. by Indenture renounces surrenders releases c. to B. C. and D. the said power condition authority c. E. dyes without issue A. by Indenture in presence of foure revokes the first uses and limits new resolved that by the feoffement the power to revoke as to limit new uses was extinct and by Wray chiefe Justice the future power may be released as a condition subsequent though the performance or breach cannot be done without an act precedent but as to this poynt the Court did not give their resolution but the whole Court agreed that if the power had beene present as t is usuall this might be extinct to any one who hath a free hold in possession reversion or remainder 'T was moved if the future power could not be released whether it might be defeated by the words of defeasance both being executory and 't was said that in all cases when any thing executory is created by a deed that the same thing by consent of all parties to the creation by their deed may be nullified as a warranty recognizance rents charge annuities covenant c. And of the same opinion was Wray chiefe Justice and the whole Court and judgement given according Chudleighs Case Or the Case of perpetuities Fo. 120. SIr Richard Chudleigh was seised in fee of the Mannor of D. and had issue foure Sonnes A. B. C. D. and 26º Aprill the third and fourth of Phillip and Mary infeoffed E. F c. in fee to the use of himselfe and his Heires of the body of G. then Wife of H. and after to the use of the performance of his Will for ten yeares immediately after his death and after to the use of the feoffes and their Heires during the life of A. the Eldest Sonne the remainder to the use of the first issue Male of the body of A. and the Heires of the body of the first issue Male and so to the second issue Male the remainder to the use of B. the second Sonne and the Heires of his body the remainder to C.
be divided For he had not the Mannor of H. for his Wife had it joyntly with him See many excellent Cases in the Booke at large adjudged upon this word Having in the Statutes the Initium of a Will ought to be full and perfect which is the writing and therefore if the devisor command one to write his Will and he devises white Acre to A. and his Heires and black Acre to B. and his Heires and dyes before the devise to B. is written yet the devise to A. is good But if he devises to A. c. upon condition and he writes the devise and the Testator dyes before the Writing of the condition t is voyd for in the one case the devises are severall and the one is perfect in the other Case t is maimed and imperfect for the intire devise was not fully put in writing so t was resolved in the Case at Barre that neither the commencement nor the end of the Will was full or perfect for at the time of writing of it and at the death of the devisor he had no power in respect of the joynt estate in H. to dispose all the Mannor of T. which amounts to the value of two parts of all Also upon the first Branch he ought to have a sole estate and here his Wife is joyntly seised with him and shee cannot disagree during coverture The Statute gives liberty to him for to devise two parts by will but this is to be intended of such Land which he might convey by act executed but here by reason of the undivided estate of the Wife he cannot dispose it but during coverture Also the third part of cleere yearly value is saved to the King and the intent of the Statute was that the King shall have the equall benefit at least for his third part as the devisee hath for two parts but here the devisee had two parts absolutely and the King but a possibility Viz. If the Wife would disagree which is at her pleasure and this Statute hath been constru'd that equality should be observed A man which held three Mannors of three Lords could not devise two of them but two parts of every one upon these words Cleere yearly value 't was said that of Inheritances which are not of any yearly value some are devisable some not as Bona et catalla felonum fugit or utlagat Fines amerciaments within such a Mannor or Towne these cannot be devised nor left to discend but a Leete Waife or Stray or other hereditament appendant or appurtenant to a Mannor passe by devise of the Mannor with th' appurtenances as incidents and the Statute had no intent for to dismember these things which by lawfull prescription had beene united But if a hundred with goods of Fellons Outlaws Fines Amerciaments returne of Writts and such other casuall hereditaments within the same hundred have beene accustomably demised for a yearely rent they may be devised within the purview of the said Act. 'T was said upon the words of the Statute which says that he may devise a rent common c. Out of two parts that a devise of a rent of the full value out of all is voyd but out of two parts 't is good And 't was observed that upon 32. H. 8. a devile of all his land had beene good for two parts as adjudged in Vntons Case for Land is severable but a rent is a thing intire and 34. H. 8. onely gives authority for to devise it The second branch which speakes of division cannot be satisfied for during his life he himselfe could not Set it out and after his death it survives to the Wife The third and fourth branch is not satisfied in this word immediatly for till disagreement without question the Mannor of H. survived to the Wife and if an Office had beene found before disagreement without doubt the Queene should have a third part of the Mannor of T. and the devise being voyd at the death of the devisor the third part lawfully vested in the Heire by discent it cannot be made good and devested by a subsequent disagreement Littleton discent to the Heire of Tenant by the courtesy of a disseissoresse doth not take away entry for the Heire comes not in immediatly 't was agreed if a man devises two acres holden by Knights service and a reversion upon a Lease for life discends to the heire this is no immediate discent within the Statute but the third part of the two ought to discend see many excellent Cases of devises adjudged upon the Statute Another good Case of relations Jennings and Braggs Case a disseisee makes an Indenture purporting a Lease for yeares and delivers it to a stranger out of the Land as an Escroule and commands him for to enter and deliver this as his deed to the Lessee who doth it and adjudged a good Lease and this diversity agreed First When the person at the first delivery hath not ability to make the contract and before the second delivery hath 't is voyd as an Infant and a Fème covert otherwise when at first delivery the person hath ability but cannot perfect it till an impediment removed which is done before the second delivery there 't is good as at Barre Resolved secondly that to some intent the second delivery shall have relation to the former by fiction of Law Vt res magis valeat quam pereat as if a Feme sole deliver a Lease as an escroule and after takes Husband or dyes yet by the second delivery 't is a good deed Ab initio and to some intent Vt res magis valeat c. it shall not relate yet in truth the second delivery hath all its force by the first and is but an execution and consummation of the former as at Barre for if it should relate to the first delivery then it would avoyd the lease for it should be made by one who was out of possession fictio legis inique operatur alicui damnum vel injuriam Thirdly 't was resolved that as to collaterall acts that there shall be no relation Omninò as if the Obligee release before the second delivery such release is voyd Ratcliffes case 34. of the Queene fo 37. A. Feme sole devises Socage land to the sonne of her daughter in taile the remainder to two Sisters of the devisee and to the heires of their two bodies by equall portions to be divided the remainder in fee to the Mother of the daughters and dyes the sonne dyes without issue Martha one of the daughters dwelling in her Mothers house daughter of the devisor within the age of 16. and above 14. departed at the second houre in the night with the consent of the husband of her Mother in whose house she was 8. miles and there married E. R. the issue was whether E.R. the Mother had the custody of the said M. at the time of the contract and marriage aforesaid for if she had then the
the King dyes the Father is King and the Son Duke by the said Statute against the rules of Law 2. The Lands cannot be so annexed to the Duchie that they cannot be severed without Statute 3. The estate is limitted to cease when the King hath no first begotten Son and to revive when he hath which cannot be without Statute 4. It should be absurd that six being then created Earles that their creation should be firme and the Creation of the Prince void 5. In the Charter there is De communi consilio Praelatorum c. and in the end Per ipsum Regem totum concilium in Parliamento such an Act as beginneth Rex Statuit and alwayes reputed for a Statute shall not be drawne in question but if it be Rex ex assensu the Commons or Lords omitting the other part it is voide 2. The said Charter having the force of a Statute is good without aid of any other Statute and although the King in his Scire facias recite another Act for thâ—s surplus the writ shall not abate 3. The Prince had the Dukedome in Fee for it is an inheritance because 21. E. 3. 41. the Princesse was indowed and it is no estate taile because it is not limitted of what body it shall come but onely that they shall be Heires to the black Prince 4. Against a generall Statute Nul tiel recorde shall not be pleaded for although it be lost yet the Judges ought to take notice of it and this is such an one which concernes the Prince and the Statute of confirmations doth not extend unto it 1. Because this hath a speciall relation to certeine defects as Misnosiner c. 2. Patents are made good onely against the King saving the right of others therefore the Princes right is saved In a Scire facias the King or Prince may reply but the most formall way is for the Attourney to replie as here he did No Sonne of the King but his first begotten shall be Duke of C. although he be Heire apparent to the Crowne Calyes Case 26. Eliz. Banco regis fo 32. 1. REsolved that to maintaine an action against an Inkeeper for goods lost c. it ought to be a common June 2. He ought to be a Passenger therefore a Neighbour shall not 3. An inholder shall not answer for any thing but that which is Infra hospitium therefore if a Passenger require that his Horse be put to grasse the inholder shall not answer if he be stollen otherwise if he require it not 4. There ought to be a default in the Inholder or his Servants therefore if a Guest bring one with him who stealeth the goods the Inholder shall not be charged otherwise if the Hostler appoint one with him in his Chamber who doth it But an inholder shall not be charged if he require the Guest to put his goods in a Chamber and he leaves them in the Court but it is no excuse to the Inholder that he delivered the Key of the Chamber to the Guest or that no goods were delivered to him 5. The Hostler shall answer for Charters if they be stollen but not if a Guest be beaten and all this appeares by the Writ and the words of it Paynes Case 29. Eliz. com banco fo 34. A Feme Tenant in taile taketh Baron and hath issue who is heard to cry and dyeth the Feme dyeth without issue the Husband shall be Tenant by the courtesie for although the state of the Feme be determined yet it is Tacite implied in the guift that every Husband of a Feme inheritable to the said estate shall have the Land for his life after the death of the Feme if he be intitled to be Tenant by the courtesie If a Feme be delivered of a Monster this doth not intitle the Husband to be Tenant by the curtesie otherwise it is if the issue had humane shape but is blemished if a Feme be ripped and the issue taken out of her Wombe the Baron shall not be Tenant by the curtesie otherwise it is if the issue which they had dyes and Lands discends after A man shall not be Tenant by the courtesie but where his issue may inherit as heire to the Feme therefore he shall not be of a possession in Law because there he makes title from the auncester of the Feme and not from the Feme Barretry 30. Eliz. fol. 36. A common Barretor is a common maintainer of Suites or quarrells in Courts or in the Countrey As first in disturbance of the peace Secondly in taking and keeping of possession with force or deceite Thirdly by false calumniation and sowing of Quarrells but to indite him of it it ought not to be that he hath done so twice or thrice but that he is a common doer of them Grieslies Case 30. Eliz. com banco fo 38. BY the custome one is chosen in a Leete to be Constable who refuseth and departeth out of the Court the Steward imposeth a Fine of 5. l. upon him for which the Bailiffes of the Lord distreine and he brings a replevin 1. Resolved every Judge of record may assesse a reasonable fine upon any man who makes contempt or disturbance to the Court but a Judge who is not of record cannot 2. This fine heeds not to be afferred because the Statute of Mag. Ch. speakes of Amerciaments and not of Fines for a fine is imposed by the Court and an Amerciament by the Jury therefore the Judgement in an Amerciament is generall Quod sit in misericordia and after upon estreits directed to the Coroners they are afferred and the Statute is that a Noble man shall be Amerced by his Peers which is not used at this day because it is reduced to a certeinty Viz. A Duke to 10. l. and others to 5. l. but an Amerciament of an Officer of the Court or he who hath execution of Writs shall be afferred by the Court so of any who is Judge as Suitors If a Juror appeare and is adjourned to a day of which he makes default this shall be inquired by his Companions for he shall be fined to the value of his Land per annum which the Court cannot know 3. A distresse may be taken for a fine without custome or for an Amerciament which is lesse Whittinghams Case 45. Eliz. fo 42. IT was resolved that if there be Lord and Tenant an Infant and the Infant make a feoffement in fee and execute the same by livery of seisin by his owne hands and after dye without heires in this case the Lord shall not have the benefit of the escheate and the Feoffement is unavoidable There be three manner of privities Viz. privity in blood 2. Privity in estate 3. Privity in Law Privities in blood as heires in blood privity in estate as joyntenants Baron and Feme Donor and Donee Lessor and Lessee c. privities in Law as Lord by escheate Lord of a Villaine c. If a Lessee for life
he lost his Common the Jury found that the Defendant did not put in the Beasts but they of themselves depastured there 1. The Jury have found the substance of the issue for the Plaintiffe the depasturing there and it is not materiall if he put them not there 2. This Action lyeth for the Commoner for he may distreine damage feasant and it may be that with strong hand he is hindered to distreine and so if he shall not have this Action he is remedilesse 2. A Commoner who had freehold in the common shall have an Assize Ergo a Copy-holder shall have this Action 3. The wrong ought to be so great that the Commoner loose his Common as a Master shall not have an Action for beating his Servant without losse of his Service and it appeareth not to the Court that there are more Commoners then he and if there be yet an Action lyeth because each had private damage and it is not like to a common Nusans which shall be punished onely in a Leete if there be not speciall damage but be the Trespasse never so little the Lord may have an Action of Trespasse The Lord Sanchars Case 10. Jacobi fol. 117. For procuring the Murther of John Turnor Mr. of Defence 1. REsolv That a Baron of Scotland shall be tried by Commons of England 2. The Indictment of the accessory in one County to a Fellony in another County by the Statute of 2. E. 6. c. 24. shall recite that the fellony was done in the other County for an Indictment is no direct affirmation of the fact 3. The Justices of the Kings Bench are within these words of the Statute Justices of Gaole-delivery or Oyer and Terminer for they are the supreame Judges of Gaole-delivery 4. The Lord Sanchar cannot be in the Terme-time Arraigned in Midd. before Justices of Oyer and Terminer because Justices of Oyer and Terminer shall not sit in the same County where the Kings Bench is but the principalls were Arraigned in L. in the Terme-time because this is another County 5. There needs not be 15. dayes for the returne of the Venire facias upon an Indictment in the same County where the Kings Bench is otherwise in another County 6. Because there is no direct proofe that the Lord S. commanded one of the principalls but that he associated himselfe to one who was commanded the best way is to arraigne him as accessory to him whom he commanded but if he be Indicted as accessory to two and found accessory to one of them this is good The word Appeale in the Statute of W. 1. c. 14. is to be intended generally Viz. By Indictment by Writ or Bill c. and attainders is to be intended upon any such accusation Ergo if upon any such accusation the principall be attainted erroneously the accessory may be arraigned because the attainder is good untill it be reversed but if the Accessory be Hanged and after the Attainder against the principall is reversed the Heire of the Accessory shall be restored to all which his Father lost either by entry or Action By 5. H. 4. cap. 10. none shall be imprisoned by Justices of Peace but in the Common Gaole whereby it appeares that Justices of Peace offend who commit Fellons to the Counters in L. and other Prisons which are not Common Gaoles Cases in the Court of Wards Anthony Lowes Case 7. Jacobi fol. 122. A. L. Tenant of 59. Acres parcell of the Mannor of A. by chivalry and Suite of Court to B. whereof A. was parcell and both A. and B. were parcell of the Duchie of L. out of the County Palatine holden formerly of the King in Chivalry in Capite and of another House there holden of A. by fealty and rent H. 8. grants the rent by release to him and confirmeth his estate in the said Lands by fealty onely and grants to him the Mannor of A. Tenendum by fealty and rent It was Objected that when the King grants the Seigniory to his Tenant the ancient Seigniory is extinct and a new one that is best for the King created Viz. Chivalry 2. When he extinguisheth services parcell of the Mannor of A. this shall be holden as the Mannor of A. is that is by Chivalry But resolved that the 59. acres and house shall be holden by fealty onely and as to the said Objection the release of the King doth not extinguish service which is inseparable to a Tenure that is fealty but all others are gone and true it is when the K. grants and expresseth no tenure it shall be by Chivalry but when the Land moveth from a Subject and the Tenure is changed the new Tenure shall be as neere the ancient as may be as Feoffee of Tenant in Frankalmoigne shall hold by fealty onely and here although they grant the services yet he limits the grantee to doe fealty A Knights fee is not to be taken according to the quantity but the value of the Land as 20. l. per annum and a Hide of Land is as much as a Plough can Plough in a yeare Reliefe is the fourth part of the annuall value that is of a Knight five pound of a Baron a 100. Markes of an Earle 100. l. of a Marques 200. Markes of a Duke 200. l. The Eldest Sonne of E. 3. called the black Prince was the first Duke in England and Robert Earle of Oxford in the Raigne of R. 2. was the first Marques and the Lord Beaumont was the first Viscount created by K. H. 6. Floyers Case 8. Jacobi fol. 125. BAron and Feme seized of Lands holden in Chivalry in right of the Feme in Fee levy a Fine to one who grants and renders to them and the heires of the Baron and levy another Fine to their use for life the remainder to their three Sons in taile one after another the remainder in fee to the heires of the Baron the K. shall have neither wardship of body nor Land 1. Resol That is out of the Statute of 32. H. 8. cap. 2. if he who had the fee dye c. in respect the estate by the first Fine did not continue and this although both the Conveyances are voluntary 2. The King shall not have wardship of the third part because it is not for advancement of the Wife for in the first Fine the Land moved from her and shee had no more by the second Fine then by the first 3. In regard the particuler estate is out of the Statute no wardship accrueth to the King by advancement of him in the remainder but if a revertioner upon an estate for life convey it to the use of his Wife this will give wardship of the body of the heire for he in revertion is tenant if a Lease for life be the remainder to two and to the heires of one he who hath the fee dyeth his heire shall not be in ward if the heire of one joyntenant who had the fee dye of full age living the tenant for
life his heire shall not be in ward although he be within age by that Statute because he is not immediate heire Sondayes Case 8. Jacobi fol. 127. M. S. deviseth to his Wife for life the remainder to W. S. and if he shall have issue that then his issue shall have it the remainder to S. the remainder to T. c. Totidem verbis upon condition that if any of them or this heires of their bodies goe about to alien that he in the next remainder to enter after the death of M. W. and S. T. suffereth a common recovery to his owne use in fee he in the next remainder enters 1. Resol Every one of the Sonnes hath an estate taile 1. These words if he dye without issue Male are sufficient to create an estate taile 2. The generall clause if any of his Sons or heires of his body doe it maketh it manifest 3. The condition proveth it for they cannot alien if they have but for life for this would be a forfeiture 2. The restraint of tenant in taile to suffer a common recovery is voyd See Mildmayes Case in the sixth Book Quicks Case 9. Jacobi fol. 129. THe King Lord I. N. and Tho. Q. mesnes of a Mannor which they hold in common in Capite and tenant of three Acres holden in Chivalry T. Q. maketh a feoffment of his moity to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to I. Q. his Son in taile the tenant infeoffeth I. Q. who infeoffeth T. Q. to defraud I. N. of the wardship of his Sonne within age and dyes I. N. seiseth the Son T. Q. dyeth the King shall not have wardship of the body and moity of the three Acres 1. Resol By the death of I. Q. it was a Chattell vested in I. N. and the King had but a possibility to have it if T. Q. dye during the minority of the ward which possibility shall not devest the wardship out of I. N. 2. When the tenant infeoffeth a stranger to defraud the Lord of wardship the Lord shall not have ravishment of ward before recovery of the Land in a right of ward and although the title of I. N. be but in action yet it shall not be devested by a descent after See the Statute of 34. H. 8. in Case of collusion Bewleys Case 9. Jacobi fol. 130. THe King Lord mesne by Socage and tenant the tenant is attainted of Treason the King grants to one tenendum by Chivalry and Rent and to doe his services to other Lords the tenant shall hold by Socage of the mesne and he by Socage of the King because the intent of the King was to revive the mesnalty which cannot be by any other way and the reviving of the ancient tenure shall be in construction preferred before the reservation of a new and the honour of the King shall be preferred before his profit and there was no default in the mesne Thomas Holts Case 9. Jacobi fol. 131. GRandfather tenant in Chivalry in Capite Father and Son the Grandfather conveyeth part of his Lands to the use of the Father and his Wife the remainder to the Son in taile c. the remainder to the right heires of the Grandfather and conveys other Lands to his younger Children for life with diverse remainders over and dyeth the Father tenders livery and before he sueth it dyeth 1. Resol By the death of the Father before livery sued and after tender the King loseth the primer seisin but not meane rates if any be due 2. The Son shall not pay primer seisin nor sue livery because the Father and not he was within the Statute of 32. H. 8. 3. If the King had had one primer seisin he shall not have another of the Lands conveyed to the younger Children but that ought to be an effectuall seisin Ergo here because the King had not the effect of the primer seisin of the Father he shall have primer seisin of the Lands conveyed to the younger Children as if hee had the grant of a prochein avoidance and presents and his Clerk dyeth before Induction he shall present again and before the Statute of Donis If tenant in taile the revertion to the King had aliened post prolem suscitatam with warranty which descends upon the King it is no barr without assets the effect of the warranty 4. The King shall not have primer seisin in regard of a secke revertion which descends to the Son otherwise if a rent be reserved the King may have that for a yeare So note for a fruitlesse revertion there shall be wardship but no primer seisin Matthew Menes Case 9. Jacobi fol. 133. TEnant of the King of a Messuage in Capite who holds other Gavelkinde Land deviseth all to his 4. Sons equally 1. Whether the King shall have a third part of the Messuage onely 2. Whether out of the part of the heire onely because Praerogativa Regis cap. 1. Rex habebit c. De quocunque tenuerint c. is intended if the Land descend to the same heire to whom the Land holden did discende 1. Resolved if no Will had beene made the King shall not have the Lands holden of others in socage but when by the Will to which he is inabled by the Statute he deviseth it to his Sonnes there the saving in 32. H. 8. giveth to the King ward and primer seisin So if Lands in chivalry devisable by custome are devised to the Feme although the devisee be good for all without aide of the Statute yet the King shall have a wardship of a third part 2. The King shall have his third part out of all their Estates equally Ascoughs Case 9. Jacobi fol. 134. THe King Lord Mesne in Capite and Tenant in socage the Mesne grants to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to the Tenant in taile if the remainder suspends the Mesnalty during the life of the Mesne Resolved that during his life the Mesnalty is not suspended 1. Not as to the Mesne because he remaineth Tenant to the Lord nor by reason of the remainder for the avoâ—ding of Fractions otherwise if the remainder be liimitted in fee for then he hath as high an estate in the Mesnalty as in the Tenancy and this can never be revived and otherwise a Seigniory in fee shall issue out of a Mesnalty for life and there will be Lord and Tenant in fee and Mesne for life but if the Lord Grant his Seigniory for yeares the remainder for life to the Tenant the Mesnalty is suspended A Mesnalty or Seigniory cannot be suspended in part and in esse for part by the Act of the party but they may by act of Law or of a third party As if the Lord take a Lease of part of the Tenancy all the Seigniory is suspended but if a Gardian indow the Feme the Seigniory is in esse for that part and suspended for the residue If two Coparceners are of a Seigniory and one commeth to the Tenancy by
them and after Judgement was given for the Plaintiffs Whistlers Case 10. Jacobi fol. 62. Vpon a speciall Verdict BEfore the Statute of Praerogativa Regis cap. 15. by the grant of the King of a Mannor all appendants without naming them passe and the Statute excepteth Knights Fees Advowsons and Indowments but all other appendants now passe without naming them and so doe Advowsons passe in case of restitution for the Statute speaketh of Grants and in Grants also without expresse mention by the words Adeo plené integré c. See other good matter there touching this Subject The Church Wardens Case of Saint Saviours in Southwark fol. 66. QUeene Elizabeth leased the rectory to the Church-Wardens of St S. for 21. yeares and after leased to them for 50. yeares in consideration of the payment of 20. l. and surrender of the Letters Patents by the Church-Wardens Modo habentes ad presens possidentes and the speciall Verdict found that they paid the 20. l. and that they delivered the Charter in Court to be cancell'd and that they paid the Fees but that no Vacat was made yet the grant is good for it appeares that the intent was not to make a surrender in deed because he saith Modo possidentes but a surrender in Law by acceptance of the second Letters Patents and although a Corporation cannot make a surrender in deed yet they may make a surrender in Law 2. Although an actuall surrender is requisit they have done all which belongs to them by delivery of the Chartar and payment of the fees and the Cancelling belongs to the Court. 3. Although it was recited that 20. l. was paid yet it needs not to be found for it is but in the personalty and is affirmed by the King to be paid and is also executed See Barwicks Case 5. Report 93. The Case of the Marshalsea 10. Jacobi fol. 68. In false Imprisonment AN Action upon the Case upon an assumpsit is brought in the Marshalsea whereas no party was of the Kings House the Plaintiffe recovered the Defendants arrested the Plaintiffe by a precept in the nature of a Capias ad satisfaciendum and he brings false Imprisonment and judgement given against the Defendants 1. Resolved the Steward and Marshall at the Common Law hath two Authorities One generall as Vicegerents of the Chiefe Justice in his absence within the Verge Another as Judges of the Marshalsea This last was limitted to Debt and Covenant where both are of the House and to trespasse Vi armis where one is but not if it concerne Land and because they have the generall authority at will and the other for life they draw many cases to the Marshalsea which ought to be in other Courts Their Jurisdiction by Fleta Lib. 2. cap. 2. Infra metas hospitij continentes 12. Leucas in circuitu And the Statute of 13. R. 2. c. 3. limits the 12. miles to be accounted about the Kings Tonnell 2. The reasons wherefore this speciall authority was given them were 1. Because the Suite there is by Bill by reason of their Priviledge which cannot be elsewhere 2. In respect of the necessity of attendance of the Kings Servants 3. If Strangers shall be suffered to sue there one Carman would sue another Carman there In aula Regis which were undecent but the generall authority vanished by the Act of 28. E. 1. c. 5. which Ordained that the Chancellour and Justices of the King should follow him therefore in Praesentia Majoris cessat c. and about 4. E. 3. the Court of K. Bench became Resident 3. The Statute of Articuli super Chartas is as much as an explanation of the great Charter and the Charter of the Forrest and not introductory of a new Law and the third Chapter of that act explaines the Jurisdiction of the Marshalsea as before and if he hold plea otherwise a prohibition lyeth and the party shall have an Action upon the Case as a consequent upon the Statute 4. That part of the Statute which giveth them Jurisdiction in trespasse shall be intended trespasse Vi armis 5. This action lyeth against the Defendants because the Court had not Jurisdiction and so have not done it by command of the Judge otherwise if the Court had Jurisdiction but proceedeth Inverso ordine or erroneously as if a Capias be awarded against an Earle c. one who is Indicted before Justices of the Peace cannot approve 1. Because he cannot assigne a Coroner 2. Because it is out of their Commission if a Court Leete be holden at another day then it ought to be the proceeding is Coram non judice otherwise it is of a Court Baron 6. R. 2. Action upon the Statute Plac. ultimo in the point that judgement in the Marshalsea when none of the parties is of the K. house may be avoided by plea without any Writ of Error which proveth that it is void Leonard Loveis Case 11. Jacobi fol. 78. In ejectione firmae for 8. acres c. L. L. seised of diverse Mannors in socage and in chivalry In Capite maketh a feoffement to diverse uses in an Indenture precedent whereby he limits to himselfe for life without impeachment of wast and to the use of his Lessees and devisees the remainder to his second Sonne in taile c. the reversion to himselfe with power of revocation after he purchaseth 8. acres in socage and revoketh as to certaine Mannors holden in socage and deviseth them and the 8. acres to his Eldest Sonne and the heires Males of his body for 500. yeares provided that if he alien otherwise then for yeares determinable upon the deaths of three persons or lesse number rendring the old rent or die without issue Male then to his second Sonne in taile with proviso to make Leases according to 32. H. 8. onely L.L. dyeth the Eldest Sonne enters into the 8. acres and dyeth leaving one Daughter who Marrieth R.D. who enters into the 8. acres c. second Sonne dyeth having L. L. who enters upon R. D. and leaseth to the Plaintiffe who enters upon whom the Defendant enters and ejecteth c. and if the entry of L L. the Lessor was congeable or not was the Question and it was adjudged that his entry was not lawfull and judgement was given against the Plaintiffe in this Case diverse points resolved some at the common Law and some upon 32 and 34. H. 8. of Wills 1. Resolv if a man seised of three acres of equall value one holden in Capite and giveth that and one of the other to his younger Sonne in taile he cannot devise any part of the third Acre because he had executed his power and if he purchase other Land in socage he can devise but two parts of that by reason of his reversion in Capite expectant upon the estate taile Object that the K. was once satisfied of the wardship by the Statute in respect of the Acre holden and the reversion thereupon shall not hinder the
devise of Land purchased after 2. The statute doth not regard this seck reversion but inheritances of annuall value Resp To the first that this reversion shall hinder the devise by the words of the Statute for he had a reversion of Lands holden but although the Statute saith that he may alien two parts by act executed or will if he alien to one of the three uses by act executed he may devise the reversion for the Statute is to be intended of an intire Alienation and where the Statute saith in reversion or remainder it is to be intended that the devisor be seised of such a remainder which drawes wardship To the second it was answered that things which of their nature are seck are out of the Statute but not things which of their nature are of annuall value but are not of value in respect of some Lease or gift Absque abliquo inde reddendo and therefore seck reversions are devisable by the said Statutes but if they be not yet they shall hinder the devises of other Lands To make one able to devise by those Statutes the time of Having Holding and disposing must concurre and therefore if a grant to the second Sonne here had beene in fee although with power of revocation the devise had been good because he had no Lands In Capite at the time of the devise if the Father conveyeth his Land to the use of his younger Sonne the eldest being within age after the death of his Father he shall be in ward although nothing discend A true Child and not in reputation is within the Statute and if the Sonne purchase Land Bona fide of his Father this is out of the Statute because it is not for his advancement If Tenant in socage devise and after purchase Land in Chivalry the devise is void for a third part but if Tenant in Chivalry and socage devise all and after aliens the Land holden this is good To make division that the King shall have a third part holden the Lands shall be taken according to their value at the time of the death of the Devisor The time of provision that a third part must discend needs not concurre with the time of alienation but it is sufficient that he had it at the time of his death The estate to any of the three purposes ought to continue to the time of death and the Tenure must till after death to make it within the Statute and the estate also of Lands holden ought to continue after death therefore if Tenant in taile in Capite devise socage Land and dye without issue this is good so privity must continue after death therefore if he who made the conveyance be attainted this is out of the Statute The uses to the second Sonne are in contingency and not executed by 27. H. 8. by the power to make Leases and devise reserved to the feoffor and therefore the fee is in the feoffor in the meane time so that having disposed of it and being seised of it he cannot devise the Land purchased after It was Objected that the Statute saith lawfully executed in his life but here no use was to be executed in the second Sonne untill after his death It was Answered that after his death the uses were derived out of the feoffement and so are as it were executed in his life It was holden by the Chiefe Justice that the remainder to the second Sonne is contingent in regard no alienation is found to be made by the Eldest and if there had been then it would be repugnant that after alienation the Land should remaine to the second Sonne and so Quacunq via data the remainder as this Case is cannot vest in him but this point was not resolved by the Court. 2. The revocation is good although the Indenture precedeth the feoffement and that the uses are in contingency and that the revocation is but in part and the Chiefe Justice held that the Eldest Sonne had but a terme determinable and the second an estate taile But in this the Kings Bench and Common pleas differ in Opinion and that if Lands be devised to one and the Heires of his body for 500. yeares the Executors shall have it and not the Heire and the devisee may alien it for it cannot be intailed and so in Peacocks Case 28. Eliz. Banco Regis was it resolved Doctor Leyfields Case 8. Jacobi fol. 88. in Trespasse IN Trespasse for Corne taken at O. C. the Defendant pleads that Q. Eliz. granted the Rectory of O. C. to C. P. without shewing the Letters Patents who demised to G. P. for 8. yeares if the said C. P. so long live and that he as servant of G. P. tooke the Corne and avers the life of C. the Plaintiffe demurreth because the plea amounteth to the generall issue and it was adjudged in the K. Bench that the barre was insufficient because the Defendant shewed not the Letters Patents and Error was brought in the Exchequer-Chamber because the plea amounts to the generall issue because the Defendant gave no colour wherein judgement ought not to be given against the Defendant but onely to answer over 2. Because he is not bound to shew the Letters Patents It was answered that colour shall not be given for colour shall not be given where the plea goeth to the barre of the right for it would be in vaine to give colour of right and to barre him if he had right as if a collaterall warranty fine Statute be pleaded or if he claimes by a waife otherwise where he pleads a discent for this doth not barre the right but the possession he who claimes by sale in a Market overt shall not give colour if he pleads generally but if he pleads that I. S. was possessed as of his owne goods and sold them in a Market overt or waived them there he shall give colour because he confesseth no interest in the Plaintiffe 2. If the Defendant claimes by the Plaintiffe he shall not give colour 3. If the plea be to the Writ or action of the Writ no colour shall be given 4. Colour shall not be given in case of Tithes for to whomsoever the Lands belong the Tithes belong to the Parson 1. Colour ought to be a doubt to the Laygents 2. It must have continuance 3. It must be such a colour that if it be effectuall will maintaine the Action 4. It ought to be given by the first conveyance 2. Resolved Lessee for yeares of Lessee for life of the K. must shew the Letters Patents for he who is privy in estate or interest or who justifieth in right of a Party or privy although he claime but part must shew the first deed and the reason that deeds are shewed to the Court is that the Judges and Jury that which respectively to them belongs shall judge of the sufficiency thereof therefore a deed shall not be suffered to be given in evidence by Witnesses or Copy except it be burned
Indictments The Statute of 3. Jacobi inflicteth Imprisonment upon a feme Covert yet it taketh not away the forfeiture before where a new person is designed by a new Statute this taketh away the ancient Statute if they cannot stand together and although there are exclusive words concerning Courts yet the Court of K. Bench is not excluded because it is Coram Rege 6. A Recusant may pleade Auterfoits convict or other collaterall barre as pardon submission c. out of the Indictment for 3. Jacobi c. 4. extends onely to defects within the Indictment or other proceedings and the informer cannot charge any who is convicted before at the suite of the Queene upon 23. or 35. Eliz. or 3. Jacobi and upon 23. the Informer must sue within a yeare and a day Nota if after a popular action comenced the K. Attorney will not prosecute the Informer may for his part and condemnation or acquittall at his suite is a barre against the K. and all others yet the K. may pardon it before an Action commenced and if the informer die the Attorney may prosecute the suite and the Information shall serve for the King The Case of the Maisters and Fellowes of Magdalen Colledge in Cambridge 13. Jacobi fol. 66. DOctor K. Master of M. Colledge and the Fellows 17. Eliz. grant to the Queene reserving rent upon condition to grant over which is done accordingly the Jury find 13. Eliz. of Deanes and Chapters and 18. Eliz of Confirmations a fine with Proclamations is levyed and five yeares passe Doctor K. dyeth the successor accepts the rent and within five yeares after his Election enters and he and the Fellowes demise to the Defendant And judgement given for the Defendant 1. Resolved the Master and Fellowes are restrained by the Statute of 13. Eliz. to grant to the Queen for the Q. is a Parson within the letter of the Statute and if he should be exempted this should be by construction of Law which cannot be 1. Because a generall Statute for maintainance of Religion and good literature and releife of the poore binds the K. although he be not named and it appeareth by the Statute of 1. Eliz. that the K. is included within the words Person or Persons for there he is exempted 2. Because the Statute is made to suppresse a tort therefore the Statute of Donis binds him 3. A Statute made to performe the intent of the Donor binds the K. without being named as the Statute of Donis 4. The Master and Fellowes are disabled to grant therefore the K. cannot purchase of them 5. The intent is to be observed which was to convey by the Queene to a Subject and so to make her an instrument of wrong as one who holdeth of the Bishop grants to the Queene to regrant to a Corporation by Covin to take away the Seigniory of the Bishop by extinguishment and to make an evasion out of the Statute of Mortmaine this Patent shall be repealed Jure regio so here and this Act extends to a Corporation not incorporate by such names as are in the Statute 2. The Statute of 18. Eliz. c. 2. doth not confirme this grant for it is out of the words of the Statutes because it is not made upon consideration and here the reversion of the rent is not considered because the Queene was to grant it before the rent be due 2. grants to the E. may be void or voidable 1. In respect of the Grantor as if an infant grant unto him 2. In respect of the thing granted as if a Foundership be granted 3. In respect of the estate as taile 4. In respect of the grant if it agree not with the rules of Law 5. In respect of omission of any circumstance as Inrollment this Statute aideth not grants of the first sort for it doth not inable persons disabled by the Law to grant as here nor of the second sort but confirmeth grants of Tenant in taile because he was able to grant but aides not grants of the fourth sort For Quae malo sunt inchoata principio vix est c. but it aideth grants of the fifth sort 3. At the time of the said Statute this grant needed no confirmation because Doctor K. the Master was living 3. The fine and Non-claime doth not barre them 1. Because although it was not a conveyance made by them yet it was suffered by them within the words of the Statute 2. Doctor K. nor any in his time cannot make his claime and claime was made within 5. yeares after his death 4. Acceptance of the rent doth not barre them because it is a body agregate of many and acceptance by the Master sole doth not barre all and the rather being without deed And judgement given Quod querens nil caperet per billam Lewis Bowles Case 13. Jacobi fol. 79. in Trover and Conversion T.B. Covenants to stand seised to the use of himselfe and his Wife for life without impeachment of wast the remainder to their first second and third Sonne successively in taile the remainder to the heires of their two bodies the remainder over they have issue I. T. B. dyes the issue dyes the Winde bloweth downe a Barne parcell of c. and the Timber in the Count mentioned was parcell of that Barne the Feme carryeth the Timber out of the Mannor he in remainder assignes by fine to the Plaintiffe the Feme dyeth the Plaintiffe brings an Action of trover and conversion against the Executors of the Feme and judgement given against the Plaintiffe 1. Resolved untill the birth of the issue T. B. and his Wife have an estate taile executed but after this it is divided and they have for life the remainder to the issue in taile 2. Tenant in taile after possibility had a greater estate as to the quallity then Tenant for life Therefore 1. He shall not be punished for wast 2. He shall not be compelled to attorne 3. He shall not have aide 4. Upon his alienation a Consimili casu lyeth not 5. After his death intrusion lyeth not 6. He may joine the mise upon the meere right 7. He shall not be named in an Action for or against him Tenant for life but not as to the quantity therefore his feoffement is a forfeiture resceit lyeth upon his default and exchange by him and Tenant for life is good 3. The Feme is not Tenant in taile after possibility c. for this must be a remainder of an estate taile by act of God and not by limitation of the party and although she be Tenant in taile after possibility of the remainder this doth not extinguish the estate for life because it is not a greater estate 4. She shall have the priviledges of Tenant in taile after possibility for the inheritance which was in her and because she is Tenant in taile after possibility of the remainder although she cannot claime it in possession 5. If Tenant for life or yeares cut Trees or prostrate Houses the
dyes after R. enters and dyes 18. Eliz. the executor of T. enters and assignes to J. S. the Successor of the Rector enters and Leases to B. who upon ouster brought an Ej. Firmae Resolved for the Plaintiffe and that the Lease to T. is voyd Argued for T. that his demise was good and a difference taken betwixt terminum annorum and tempus annorum as in this case of the demise to T. during so many yeares of the fourescore yeares c. not of the terme of fourescore yeares if a Lease be made for 21. yeares and after another Lease to commence from the end and expiration of the said terme of yeares and after the first Lease is surrendered the second terme shall commence presently not so if it were from the end of the said 21. yeares Resolved that the demises to R. and W. are voyd because the terme that El. had was sub modo if she should so long live which is determined by her death ergo no residue can remaine to R. and W. and so 't was adjudged between Greene and Edwards and the Court agreed the diversity betwixt the demises to R. and W. and the demise to T. 't was argued that the demise to T. was voyd 1. Because that the Lessor had not power for to contract for the land during the fourescore yeares for he had but a possibility to have the land againe during the fourescore yeares viz. if El. dyed which possibility cannot be demised but the Court delivered no opinion to this poynt 2. That the Lease to T. was voyd for the incertainty how many yeares should be behinde at the death of El. a termor grants to B. so many yeares as shall be behinde tempore mortis suae 't is voyd Locrofts case adjudged a man possessed of a terme of 90. yeares upon marriage of his Sonne demised the land to his Sonne for 70. yeares to commence after his death the Lessor dyes the lease was adjudged good because here he demised the land for 70. yeares which is certaine in which this differs from 7. E. 6. which diversity was agreed by the whole Court 3. That 't was voyd because he dyed in the life of El. so that the incertainty cannot be reduced to a certainty in his life time and so cannot rest in the executors a lease to one for so many yeares as his Executors shall name is voyd Note a diversity betwixt a covenant and agreement which is perfect and certaine though it takes effect in possession upon a future matter precedent and a covenant and agreement incertaine which is to be reduced to a certainty by matter ex post facto for in the first case the estate is bound presently in the other not which was agreed by the Court. 4. It was moved if T. had been in life the demise could not rest in him T. dyed before R. or W. and R. survived El. and by the expresse condition precedent R. could not take except El. dyed within the terme and W. could not take except R. dyed within the terme and this is as much as to say that if R. dyes before El. and T. cannot take except W. dye in the life of El. and R. survived El. So that both precedent contingencies faile viz. the death of R. and W. in the life of El. and though the demise to R. and W. are voyd yet the limitation precedent viz. the death of R. and W. in the life of El. to the demise to T. is not voyd for his interest may depend upon both the contingencies for so was the intention of the parties and this was affirmed by the whole Court by Popham Chiefe Justice The Lease to T. was voyd for another cause for it cannot commence upon a contingent which depends upon another contingent as here the demise to T. depends upon the contingent annexed to the demise made to W. and the demise to W. depends upon a contingency annexed to the demise to R. Digges Case 42. Eliz. fo 173. C. Digges was seised of the land in question and other lands in fee and by Indenture 6. Maij. 10. of the Queene covenanted in consideration of marriage betwixt him and his wife and for the advancement of T. their Sonne and for two hundred pounds paid to him before marriage that he and his heires would stand seised to the use of himselfe for life and after to T. in taile and after to the use of himselfe in taile with a proviso for the considerations aforesaid c. that it should be lawfull for him at any time during his life with consent of certaine persons by Indenture to be Inrolled in any of the Kings Courts to revoke any of the uses or estates and for to limit new uses 6. Maij. 12. of the Queene C. by consent c. by Indenture inrolled in the Chancery revoked the uses and estates aforesaid in part of the land and limitted the use of it to him and his heires after 20. Sept. 13. of the Queene by Indenture with consent c. inrolled in Banck M. 13. 14. of the Queene declared that for the payment of his debts that from the time of the inrollment of this Deed in Chancery all the uses in the first Indenture should be voyd and that the land should be to the use of himselfe in fee after C. 26. Octob. 14. of the Queene by Indenture covenanted for to levie a Fine of all his land part of which should be to the use of himselfe and his wife and his heires which Fine was levied the same terme after the Indenture dated 20. Sept. was inrolled in Chancery after C. enters and makes his claime and whether C. dyed seised in fee of the land mentioned in the Deed of Revocation of 20. Sept. was the question Adjudged 1. that C. D. might revoke part at one time part at another till he hath revoked all but he can revoke the same part but once except that he hath a new power c. to uses newly limitted for these words at any time amount to from time to time c. 2 That where the revocation is to be by Deed Indented to be inrolled this is as much as to say as by Deed Indented and inrolled and till inrollment no revocation shall be for otherwise perchance none shall be inrolled 3. That 't was no perfect revocation by the Indenture of 20. Sept. till the Deed were inrolled in the Chancery for though that the proviso of revocation in the first Indenture shall be satisfied with an inrollment in any of the Kings Courts yet for that the Indenture of revocation it selfe limits the revocation to take effect after the inrollment in Chancery it ought to be so 4. That the Fine levied before the inrollment in Chancery which was before the revocation hath extinct the power see Albaines case before adjudged and Popham Chiefe Justice said that without question such a power might be released for 't is not meerely collaterall but savours and tastes of
fine be reversed by nonage of the wife all the estate shall be restored to the wife presently for all the estate passed from her by the fine and so it was adjudged Banco regis in Worseleys case Resolved that though the variance of the limitation be onely in one estate and they agree in all the other yet all is voyd But if two joynt tenants or two having severall estates vary 't is good for every of their parts and shall be directed by their interests but if the variance had been in limitation of part of the land and they had agreed in the use it should be voyd for that part and good for the residue Note That though the husband might dispose of the land during coverture yet for the cause aforesaid his declaration was voyd If A. tenant for life and B. in reversion or remainder both levie a fine together generally the use shall be to A. for life the reversion or remainder to B. in fee for either of them grants that which lawfully he may grant and either of them shall have the use which the Law vesteth in them according to the estate which they would convey over Winningtons case 40. of the Queene fo 59. W. Infeoffed B. upon condition to regive to the Feoffor for life the remainder to J. Sonne and heire of the Feoffor the Feoffor enters and takes the profits without agreement or contradiction of the Feoffee and leases to D for 21. yeares and yet continues possession the Feoffee acknowledges a Statute to J. the Feoffor makes a feoffement to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to his second Sonne in taile c. and dyes the Feoffee enters and infeoffes the Sonne and heire upon which the second Sonne enters c. Resolved that though the intention was that the Feoffee should make an estate to him for his life when he hath entered without agreement of the Feoffee 't is a disseisin and the rather because as owner of the land he tooke upon him to make a Lease for yeares Resolved that by the Lease by Indenture he hath dispensed with the condition during the terme Resolved that when the Feoffor disseises the Feoffee upon condition and the Feoffee acknowledges a Statute c. This is no disability to cause the Feoffor to enter for the right of the Feoffee is not subject to the Statute but when the Feoffee in possession takes a wife grants a rent or acknowledges a Statute the land is presently subject c. And though upon entry he may be disabled yet till then he is not because the wife may dye or the Statute be released and then he may enter and performe the condition and the Feoffor by his feoffement hath extinct the condition so that the Feoffee may enter and when he hath infeoffed the eldest Sonne he hath done well Westcots Case in Communi Banco 41. El. fo 60. IF a man make an estate to three and to the heires of one of them one of them in this case hath Fee simple and yet the joynt estate continues for it is all one estate created at one time and therefore the Fee simple cannot drowne the joynture which taketh effect with creation of the remainder in fee but when three joyntenants are for life and after one of them purchase the Fee or else the Fee discends to him there the Fee simple doth drowne the estate for life for the estate for life was in esse before Note by this resolution if tenant for life grant his estate to him in the reversion and a stranger 't is a surrender for the moity and the benefit of survivor not regarded so the doubt in 7. H. 6. well resolved Resolved upon view of three presidents that judgement should be given for the plaintiffe upon a demise made by husband and wife without alledging it to be by Deed. Tookers Case 43. Eliz. fo 66. IOhn Arundell seised of Lands in Fee maketh a Lease thereof to A. and B. for their lives and after grants the reversion to C. for his life to which grant A. doth atturne being joynt tenant with B. and after A. by his Deed doth surrender to C. all his estate title and interest c. and then dyeth C. entereth claiming to hold in common with B. and whether his entree was lawfull or no was the question and judgement was given that it was lawfull for the attornement of the one tenant for life shall vest the entire reversion in the grantee because the estate of the joynt Lessees is entire and every joynt tenant is seised per my pro tout ' and by consequence the reversion which is dependent and expectant upon this estate is entire also and the atturnement of the one joyntenant is the atturnement of both Attournement is a lawfull act if one joyntenant assigne Dower 't is good Also the attornement passes no interest from him that attournes but perfects the grant of another And if one joyntenant give seisure of rent that shall binde the other but in a quid juris clamat or quem redditum reddit or per quae servitia one joyntenant shall not be permitted to attourne without his companion for doing of prejudice to his companion By Popham one joynt-tenant may prejudice another in the personalty but not in the realty if one take all the profits or release a personall action the other hath no remedy because of the privity and trust betweene them and the folly imputed to him to joyne with such a companion Note if a tenant have notice of the grant by a stranger and doe give his assent thereunto it is a good atturnement although it be in the absence of the grantee but disagreement ought to be to the party himselfe or doe atturne for any part it is good for the whole for the intent of an atturnement is but onely an assent to perfect the grant of another and he which atturnes cannot apportion divide or alter the grant Lord Cromwells case 40. of the Queene fo 70. BLunt bargained c. the Mannor of Alexton to which the Advowson of A. was appendant by Indenture to have as after in the same Indenture is mentioned and B. covenanted to suffer a common Recovery to the use of Andrewes and his heires rendring 42. pounds per annum to B. and his heires with a nomine poenae And further 't was covenanted and agreed as well for the assurance of the Mannor to A. as of the rent to B. that B. should levie a Fine c. to A. and his heires and A. by the same Fine should render a rent of 42. pounds per annum c Provided alwayes that A. by Deed should give the Advowson c. to B. during his life and if it did not become voyd during his life one turne to his executors c. And further 't was covenanted and agreed that all assurances afterwards to be made should be to the use of this Indenture c. after a recovery was
had and after B. and A. levie a Fine to Perkins and he renders a rent of 42. pounds to B. and the Mannor with the Advowson to A. A. dyes without granting the Advowson and B. did not request it B. enters for condition broken and by Indenture inrolled bargained c. to the Lord Cromwell by which he entered and upon the reentry of the Sonne and heire of A. brought an Assise In this Case is shewed when this word proviso or provided maketh a condition and when not which upon long debate was judged by all the Justices of England It was adjudged that the Law hath not appointed any place in a deed or instrument proper or particular to a condition but in what place it pleaseth the parties and this word proviso or provided is as apt a word to make an estate conditionall as Sub conditione or any other word of condition but notwithstanding when this word proviso maketh an Estate or interest conditionall three things are to be observed First that the proviso doe not depend upon another sentence nor participate thereof but stand originally of it selfe Secondly that the proviso be the word of the bargainor Feoffor Donor Lessor c. Thirdly that it be compulsory to enforce the barganee Feoffee Donee Lessee c. to doe an act and where these concurre it was resolved that it was a condition in what place soever it be placed for Cujus est dare ejus est disponere And although words of Covenant be contained in the same clause of the proviso it selfe yet the proviso being in judgement of Law a word of condition it shall not loose his force and so it hath beene judged In Symson et Titterell 26. El. Serjeant Bendlowes demysed to Titterell certaine Lands in Essex for forty yeares provided alwayes and it is Covenanted and agreed betweene the said Parties That the Lessee c. should not alien and this was adjudged a condition by force of the proviso and a Covenant also by force of th' other words Also it was adjudged in Banco Regis 36. El. betweene the Earle of Pembrooke Plaintiffe and Sir Henry Barkely Defendant The Earle granted the Office of the Lievtenant-ship of the West part of the Forrest of Fronslewood in Com. Somerset to Sir Mawrice Barkely Father of the said Sir Henry in Taile provided alwayes and the said Sir Mawrice Barkeley for him c. doth Covenant to and with the said Earle that neyther he the said Earle nor any of his Heires Males c. shall cut downe any Wood growing upon any part of the premises And it was resolved by all the Justices of England upon argument before them at Serjants Inne that although the proviso was coupled with the expresse Covenant of the Grantee and every condition ought to be created by the words of the Grantor Donor Feoffor c. yet in judgement of Law this word provided was a condition created by the Grantor although all the residue of the sentence be the words of the Grantee for proviso being an apt word of a condition the same sentence containeth the words of the Grantor purporting a condition and the words of the Grantee comprehending a Covenant This word proviso when it dependeth upon another sentence or hath reference to another part of the deed doth not make a condition but a qualification or limitation of the sentence or part of the deed to which it is referred As in a Lease without impeachment of wast provided that he shall not doe voluntary wast grant of a Rent charge provided that the Grantee shall not charge the Grantor c. Resolved that B. shall have the Rent notwithstanding that before the Reddendum the use in Fee was vested by the recovery in A. and notwithstanding 't was objected that the Rent ought to be limitted out of the Estate of the Recoverors for 27 H. 8. hath an expresse clause Where diverse be seised to the intent that one shall have an annuall Rent the same person be adjudged in possession and seisin of the same rent as if a sufficient grant had beene made and so here the intent being that B. should have the Rent construction shall be made Vt res magis valeat quam pereat Resolved that the fine leavyed by B. and A. to P. hath not extinct the condition and this was the great doubt of the Case 1. Because by the generall Covenant 't is declared that all assurances afterwards to be made should be to the uses and intents in the same Indenture and to no other and the Indenture intends that the condition should be saved as the Lord releases all his right in the Land saving his Rent Putnams Case 4. 5. P. and M. Dyer Feoffement of a Mannor rendring Rent and a reentry and a Covenant by any Indenture to Leavy a fine which should be to the uses and intents of the first Indenture and to no other use which was leavyed according with the usuall words of release of all his right yet resolved that neither the Rent nor the condition was destroyed and 23. of the Queene Tussers Case a rent reserved by a fine before was not destroyed by a common recovery and generall entry into warranty and 34. of the Queene in Clever and Childs Case adjudged according to Putnams Case for the same reason t was adjudged in this Case 14. of the Queene for the Advouson of Alexton for Modus et conventio vincunt legem and Covenant and agreement of the parties hath power First to raise a use Secondly to declare uses upon fines recoveries c. Thirdly for to preserve Rents and conditions and for to direct recoveries fines c. and the saving may be contained in another deed delivered at the same time And these common assurances as fines and recoveries are to be construed according to the intent and common usage without prying into them with Eagles eyes Also here the Bargaine c. recovery c fine c. though made at severall times yet all by mutuall agreement are but one assurance and tend for to perfect a bargaine c. and therefore the one shall not destroy the other resolved that except in speciall cases a fine Sur grant render cannot be averred by word to another use then is in the fine feoffement c. yet in some cases it may be ruled in part by averrement by word when the originall contract is by deed but a man may by word averre another consideration which stands with the consideration expressed but not against it Reade the Booke at large for this purpose Resolved that by the death of A. the condition was broken for when the Feoffee or Grantee is to doe an act to the Feoffor c. upon condition and no time is limitted regularly the Feoffee may doe it at any time during his life If the Feoffor or Grantor doe not hasten the same by request and upon request and day or time limitted the Feoffee or Grantee ought to doe it
accordingly and if no request be made and the Feoffee or Grantee that ought to performe the condition dye the condition is broken Yet this generall rule admits an exception for here in case of an advowson he hath not time during his life though no request be made but upon contingency to wit if no avoydance fallin the meane time for if the Grantee stay till the avoydance fall Ipso facto the condition is broken for B. cannot have all the presentations during his life which was the effect of the grant and the Advowson is come into another plight then t was But where the day is certaine for the performance and the party dye before the condition is discharged because the performance is become impossible by the Act of God and therefore when a day certaine is appointed t is good that the Heire of the feoffee be named in the condition Another diversity was also agreed when t is to be performed to a stranger he ought to request the stranger in convenient time for to limit a time when it shall be done but if it be to the Feoffor himselfe he ought not to performe it before request Another diversity was taken by some when the feoffee dyes and when the feoffor dyes for in the one case the condition is broken in the other not Binghams Case 43. of the Queene fo 91. R. Bingham the Grandfather held the Mannor of B. M. of Sir Jo Horseley as of his Mannor of H. and levyed a fine to the use of him and his Wife for life and after of R. the Father his Sonne and Heire in taile and after to the right Heires of the Grand father R. the Father dyed the remainder in taile discended to R. his Sonne within age Sir I. H. suffered a recovery of the Mannor of H. to the use of himselfe and his Wife in taile and after to Sir R. H. his Sonne and Heire in taile after to the Heires of Sir I. Sir I. and his Wife dyed without issue Sir R. enters R. B. the Grandfather dyes by which the reversion in Fee discended to R. B. the Wife of Robert dyes R. within age enters and Leases c. Resolved that the use limitted to the right Heires of the Grandfather upon the fine is a reversion in the Grandfather expectant upon the taile not a Remainder so t was resolved in Fenwick and Mitfords Case and so t was resolved in the Earle of Bedfords Case Resolved that Sir R. H. shall not have the ward of the Land for the reversion in Fee is holden of him and not the Taile though both discend from the same Ancestor for the taile cannot be drowned and if Tenant in taile grant over the reversion he shall hold the Taile of his Grantee and though the Seigniory of the taile be suspended yet the Donee hath two distinct estates and the reversion is as a Mesne betwixt the Donee and the Lord and the Lord is not defeated for the Law gives no wardship in such cases and if it were admitted that by the unity of Tenure betwixt the Donee and reversion t was determined yet nothing shall be holden of the Lord but the reversion and in some cases the Donee in taile shall hold of no body as a gift in taile the remainder to the King Resolved if the Grandfather were Tenant for life the remainder to the Father in taile the remainder to the Father in fee the Father dyes his Heire within age and Sir I. H. grants the Seigniory to Sir R. H. and the Grandfather dyes that Sir R. H. shall not have the ward of the Heire because R. the Father did not hold of him nor any of his Ancestors the day of his death nor the Taile was not within the see and Seignory of Sir Ra. or any of his Ancestors at the death of R. the Father and the Writ saith Praecipe c. Eo quod terram illam de eo tenuit die quo obijt And though that during the life of Tenant for life the Heire of the remainder shall not be in ward because Tenant for life is Tenant to the Lord yet the death of Tenant for life is not the cause of ward but the removing of an impediment as in Paget and Caries Case Tenant for life commits wast and after Tenant for life in remainder dyes he in remainder in fee shall have wast T was said when two accidents are required to the consummation of a thing and the one happens in the time of one and the other in the time of another neither the one nor the other shall have benefit by it as the Tenant ceases for a yeare the Lord grants his seigniory and then the Tenant ceases for another yeare neither shall have a Cessavit which was agreed So Lacies Case Trin. 25. of the Queene who gave a mortall wound upon the sea of which the party dyed upon the Land yet he was discharged because the stroake was upon the Sea the death upon the Land so that neither the Admirall nor a Jury can inquire of it and t was said when diverse accidents are required to the consummation of a thing the Law more respects the Originall cause then any other A man presents to a Church in time of Warre notwithstanding the party be instituted and inducted Tempore pacis all is voyd So the Law more respects the death of him in the remainder the Originall cause of wardship then the death of Tenant for life which is but Causa sine qua non and rather a removing of an impediment then a cause so t was resolved that neyther the one nor the other shall have the ward Resolved that Sir Ra. should not have the third part of the Land by 32. 34. H. 8. for though R. the Grandfather had limitted the use to the Father which is within the Statute yet when R. the Father dyes in the life of the Grandfather the Statute extends no further for the Heire of the Father who is in by discent shall be in ward by the common Law not by the Statute and if the Statute should extend to the Son and Heire of him in remainder by the same reason it should extend to all the Heires of him in remainder In infinitum THE THIRD BOOK The Marques of Winchesters Case 25. of the Queene fo 1. LIonell Norris and Anne Mills were seised of the Mannor of M. and to the heires of the body of L. a common Recovery is had against L. without naming Anne H. Norris being in remainder in taile is executed for Treason and 't is enacted that he shall forfeit Mannors c. uses possessions offices rights conditions and all other hereditaments L. dyed without issue Anne dyed the Queene brought error against the Marques of Winchester heire of the survivor of the recoverors the error was that the originall Writt of entry wants the defendant pleaded that 14. of the Queene shee gave and restored to the Lord Norris Sonne and heire of H. Norris
the husband had and to the remainder A. tenant in taile the remainder to B. the remainder to C. the remainder to D. A. makes a Feoffement the feoffee suffers a recovery B. is vouched and he vouches the common vouchee A. is not bound but B. and all the remainders are for though the remainders are discontinued and cannot be remitted till the taile be recontinued yet in a common recovery which is the common assurance he which comes in as vouchee shall be in judgement of Law in privity of the estate which he ever had though the precedent estate upon which the estate of the vouchee depends be discontinued so here the husband shall be said in of the taile and 't is the stronger because the estate of the wife was put to a right so that the husband came in as sole tenant in taile and not joyntly with his wife because she is not vouchee and he cannot be in of another estate because once he had a taile but had they had a joynt estate to them and the heires of their two bodies he being onely vouched it might be doubted whether the taile should be barred because the wife had a joynt inheritance with him 8. of the Queene Dyer Knivetons case A Praecipe is brought against tenant for life and the remainder in taile they vouch over it shall not binde the taile for the remainder is not tenant to the Praecipe and the land is recovered against the tenant for life onely and recompence shall not goe to the remainder and the remainder was never seised by force of the taile and so 't was adjudged in Leach and Coles case 41. of the Queene Heydons case 26. of the Queene fo 7. THe Gardians and Cannons Regular of the late Colledge of O. seised of the Mannor of O. granted a Coppihold to Father and Sonne for their lives c. and after they leased it to H. for fourescore yeares rendring the ancient Rent and after surrendred their Colledge Resolved that the lease to H. was voyd the Coppi-hold for life continuing by the Statute of 31. H. 8. For Coppihold is an estate for life and the Statute saith of which any estate or interest for life c. at the making of such grant had continuance reade the Booke at large where you have admirable rules for true interpretation of all Statutes Resolved when a Parliament alters the service tenure interest of the land c. in prejudice of the Lord custome or tenant the generall words shall not extend to Coppi-holds as the Statute of W. 2. de donis conditionalibus doth not extend to them for if the Statute should alter the estate this should also alter the tenure for the donee ought to hold of the donor and to doe such services without speciall reservation as his donor did to the Lord and the intent of the act was not to extend to such base estates which were taken then but tenants at will and the Statute saith Voluntas donatoris observetur in carta c. So that which shall be intailed ought to be such an hereditament which may be given by Charter and great part of the land within the Realme being granted by Coppy it would be inconvenient that Coppi-holds should be intailed yet neither Fine nor Recovery should barre them so that the owner cannot without making a forfeiture by assent of the Lord and a new grant dispose of it for payment of debts advancement of his wife or younger issues wherefore the Statute doth not extend to them by Manwood Ch' Baron which the Court agreed But 't was objected that the Custome and the Statute cooperating might make a taile as if by a custome a remainder had been limitted over and injoyed and plaints in nature of a Formedon in discender brought and the land recovered by it so neither the custome without the Statute nor the Statute without the custome can make a taile And Littleton saith that if a custome hath been that lands c. have been granted c. or in taile c. paulo post that a Formedon in discender lyes of all tenements which Writ was not at common law Manwood answered if the Statute doth not extend to them without question the custome cannot for before the Statute all estates of inheritance were fee simple and no custome can commence after the Statute for this being made 13. E. 1. is made within time of memory and Littleton is to be intended of a fee simple conditionall for he knew well that no custome could commence after the Statute of W. 2. as appeares in his booke 2. ca. 10. and 34. H. 6. and a Formedon in discender in speciall cases lay at the common Law And by the Court another Act made at the same time which gives an Elegit extends not to Coppiholds for the reason aforesaid but other Statutes made at the same time extend to them as ca ' 3. which gives a Cui in vita receite and ca ' 4. which gives to the particular tenant a Quod ei deforceat Resolved that though 't was not found that the said rents were the usuall rents accustomed to be reserved within 20. yeares before yet because 't was found that the accustomed rent was reserved and a custome goes to all times before it shall be so intended without shewing the contrary and judgement was enterd for the Queene The common Law is founded upon the perfection of reason and not according to any private and sudden conceite or opinion Borastons Case 29. of the Queene fo 19. B. Devised land for eight yeares and after to his executors to performe his will till H. his youngest Sonne come to the age of 21. yeares and when H. comes to 21. yeares then that he shall have to him and his heires H. dyed at the age of 9. yeares Objected that till H. attaines to 21. yeares the land descends to the heire and for that he never attained to 21. yeares this remaines in the heire and the intent appeares by the words that he should not have till he come to 21. yeares and this ought to precede the commencement of the remainder and if land were leased till H. comes to 21. yeares H. then being of 9. yeares 't is no absolute lease for 12. yeares for if H dye before 21. the lease shall be determined which the Court agreed 'T was also said that when the particular estate which should support the remainder may determine before the remainder can commence there the remainder doth not vest presently but depends in contingency If one make a Lease to A. for life and after the death of B. the remainder to another in Fee this remainder depends upon contingency for if A. dye before B. the remainder is voyd A Lease is made to A. for life the remainder to B. for life and if B. dye before A. the remainder to C. for life this is a good remainder upon contingency If A. survive B. which case is all one with
land of M. was lost by the Statute of 4. and 5. P. and M. ca ' 8. Resolved that there were two manners of custodies or Gardianships the one by the common law the other by the Statute at common Law foure manner of Gardians viz Gardian in Chivalry Socage Nature by Nurture The first two are fully described in our Bookes but great controversie was at barre for Gardian by Nature Some held that the Father onely shall have the custody of his sonne and heire apparent within age not the Mother Grandfather c. Also that the Father shall not have the custody of his daughter and heire for it ought to be such an heire as shall continue sole and apparent heire as the Father shall not have the custody of the youngest sonne in Borough English for tenure in Chivalry Others affirme that not onely the Father but every auncestor male or female shall have the custody of his heire apparent male or female Trespas quare 〈◊〉 consanguinium haeredem of the plaintiffe cujus maritagium ad ipsum pertinet c. rapuit c. lyes The Mother though she had no land brought ravishment of ward of J. her Sonne and heire against the grandfather who had land that might descend By the Court both erre for 't is true that every auncestor shall have trespas or ravishment of ward against a stranger for his heire male or female and the Writ shall say Cujus maritagium ad ipsum pertinet and good reason for the establishment of his house consists upon providing of a convenient marriage for his heire apparant and it matters not of what age such heire is but such action lyes not against gardian in chivalry by any of his auncestors but the Father So the Court resolved here the Mother could not be gardian in Socage if the land had descended to the daughter nor by nurture because she was above 14. but the common Law gives remedy against a Stranger as aforesaid Resolved here the Mother shall have the custody within the provision of the Act which hath ordained two new manners of custodies 1. By reason of nature 2. By assignation the first the Father after his death the Mother the second by assignation of the Father by his will or any act in his life See the Booke at large for the exposition of this Statute Resolved that the assent of the husband was not materiall for the Statute hath annexed the custody to the person of the Mother jure naturae which is inseperable and by marriage cannot be transferred to the husband the Father shall not forfeit the wardship by outlawry nor shall his Executors have it Resolved though she departed out of the house sixe houres before the contract yet in judgement of Law the Mother had the custody at the time of the contract for 't is inseperably annexed to the person of the Mother Resolved that by this devise the two daughters wete tenants in common in taile by these words equally to be divided though they never make partition in facto and so it hath been often adjudged Resolved that the husband and wife damsell had good title upon this verdict against the other daughter for by these words to the next of kin to whom the inheritance should c. come after her decease during the life of such person who shall so contract c. it seemes the daughter shall not have the forfeiture for though she be of the blood yet if M. dye her issue shall have the land if without issue the Mother in the remainder To the objection that the Mother cannot have it for she is not of the blood of the daughter but econtra Father or Mother are not next to whom administration shall be granted and land shall escheate rather then it shall goe to Father or Mother Resolved often against 5. E. 6. that the Father or Mother are next to whom administration may be granted and Littleton says that the Father is neerer of blood then the Uncle and therefore the Father shall have a remainder limitted to the next of blood of the Sonne but he shall not have an inheritance by discent from the Sonne for a Maxime prohibits it And 't was said at barre if he in reversion had been brother of the halfe blood he might have entered as Proximus de sanguine yet none of the halfe blood could inherit See the Booke at large where is excellent learning of discents as also the learning of Possessio fratris c. Resolved by the Court that it doth not come in question who shall enter for the forfeiture by the Statute for the issue was joyned upon a collaterall point whether the Mother had the custody at the time of the contract and the finding of the Jury is not materiall and therefore though the Plaintiffe who was lessee of the husband of the damsell as appeared had good title against the defendant being lessee of the husband of the other Sister yet because the issue was found against him judgement was given Quod nihil capiat c. Boytons case 35. Eliz. in Banco regis fo 43. A Writ of cap ad satisfaciendum is retornable at Westminster die Lunae prox post Crastin Animarū the partie is arrested the Sheriffe is not bound to bring the prisoner in recta Linea from the place where he was arrested or from the Countie But if he have the prisoner in Court at the day of the returne being never out of his custody in the meane season it is good But if a Sheriffe or a Bayliffe assent that one who is in execution and under their custody to goe out of the Gaole for a time and then to returne yet although he returne at the time it is an escape And so it is likewise if a Sheriffe suffer him to goe with a Bayliffe or a Keeper for the Sheriffe ought to have him in arcta custodia the Statute of Westminster 2. cap. 11. says Quod carceri manucipentur in ferris So as the Sheriffe may keepe him in yron and fetters to the intent that they may sooner satisfie their Creditors The Sheriffe upon a Habeas corpus for one in execution may bring the partie what way he will so as he have his bodie at the day according to the Writ If one in execution escape out of the Gaole and fly into another Countie the Sheriffe upon fresh suite taketh him again before any action brought against the Sheriffe the Judges have adjudged this no escape and if one in execution escape de son tort and be taken againe he shall never have an audita querela because a man shall not take advantage of his own wrong Sir George Brownes case 36. of the Queene fo 50. ISsue in speciall taile the remainder to himselfe in fee in the life of his Mother tenant in speciall taile levies a Fine in truth with Proclamations though they were not found to Sir G. B. the Mother living the Sonne leased for three lives
for the intended recompence and if the wife and the issue had joyned in a Fine this had barred the taile so if the wife had surrendered the issue might have suffered a recovery H. 39. of the Queene the case was that the younger Sonne tenant in taile by devise was vouched in a recovery suffered by a woman tenant for life by the same devise and this was to the use of the vouchee and his heires who dyed and 't was adjudged that the Sister of the vouchee by the intire bloud shall have it not the elder brother that the recovery was not within 14 of the Queene though suffered by tenant for life and the Statute says that it shall be utterly voyd for 't was not the intent that the Act should extend to a recovery in which he in remainder in taile was vouched who had an estate that might continue for ever and had the power to docke all the remainders so here this Statute doth not extend to this warranty because c. Resolved when the first issue disables himselfe for to take advantage of the forfeiture and dyes his issue shall never take benefit of it because he was not in rerum natura nor had the immediate interest at the time and this was Sir George Brownes case before where the issue in taile in the life of his Mother tenant in speciall taile levied a Fine without proclamations and here if error were in the recovery the warranty barres him of his action because he himselfe by his own act hath barred his entry But here if the wife had released c. after the death of the issue his issue might have avoyed the warranty Note Reader it seemes to me if in such case a woman levies a Fine or suffers a recovery though the daughter enters or not and though she joynes in the Fine or is vouched in the recovery or by any other act disables her selfe yet the Sonne borne after shall take advantage of it for entry upon this Act of 11. H. 7. is not like entry upon the Statute of 6. R. 2. ca ' 6. For there the daughter by expresse words hath it as a perquisite but upon 11. H. 7. per formam doni Resolved if tenant in taile in of another estate suffer a common recovery and a collaterall auncestor releases with warranty to the recoveror after the recoveror makes a Feoffement to uses which are executed by the Statute of 27. H. 8. and the auncestor dyes though the estate be transferred in the post before the discent of the warranty yet it shall binde and the terr-tenants shall Rebutt See excellent learning upon this point where an estate transferred in the post before discent of the warranty shall binde where not and where there shall be Rebutter in such case where not Pennants case 38. of the Queene fo 64. LEase for yeares upon condition that the lessee shall not assigne c. without assent of the lessor he assignes c. the lessor not having notice of the assignement accepts the rent due after and enters it was adjudged for the lessor his entry lawfull for that the condition being collaterall the breach whereof may be so secretly contrived that it is not possible for the lessor to have notice thereof and notice in this case is materiall and issuable for otherwise the lessee might take advantage of his owne fraud But if a man make a Lease for yeares rendring rent upon condition if the rent be not paid to reenter In this case if the Lessor demand the rent and the same is not paid if after he accept the rent before the reentry made due at another day he hath dispensed with the condition for there the condition is annexed to the rent and he having made demand of the rent well knew the condition was broken but although in this case that he accept the rent due at that day for which he made the demand yet he may reenter for as well before as after his reentree he may have an action of debt for the rent upon the contract between the Lessor and the Lessee If the Lessor distraine for the rent for which the demand was made he hath affirmed the Lease for after the determination of the Lease he may not distraine for rent It was also resolved that as well in case of the condition annexed to the rent as in case of a condition annexed to any collaterall act if the conclusion of the condition be that then the Lease for yeares shall be voyd there no acceptance of the rent due at any day after the breach of the condition will make the voyd Lease good Resolved that as a voidable Lease cannot be affirmed by word for money c. so the acceptance of a rent which is not In esse nor due to him which accepts it doth not affirme the Lease as a gift to a Husband and Wife and to the Heires of the body of the Husband the Husband dyes the issue accepts the rent of the Lessee of the Husband during the life of the Wife the Wife dyes yet the issue shall avoyd the Lease for no rent was due And there is a diversity betweene a Lease for life and for yeares in case of a lease for life though the conclusion of the condition be that it shall be voyd yet acceptance of a rent due after the breach shall affirme it for the freehold being created by livery cannot be determined before entry If the successor accept the rent upon a Lease for yeares of a Parson Vicar Prebend 't is worth nothing for 't is voyd by death otherwise of a Lease for life But if the successor of a Bishop Abbot or Prior accept the rent upon a Lease for yeares he shall never avoyd it for 't was voydable onely Note Reader it seemes to me if upon a Lease for life the Lessor accepts the same rent which was demanded he hath affirmed the Lease for he cannot accept it as due upon any contract as upon a Lease for yeares for when he accepts it he cannot have an action of Debt for it but his remedy was by Assise if he had seisin or by distresse but after reentry he may have an action of Debt If he that hath a rent service or rent charge accepts the rent due at the last day and therfore makes an acquittance all the arrerages due before are thereby discharged and so it hath beene adjudged In Hopkins Mortons Case 10. El. Dyer A man is not bound to pay an annuity without an Acquittance but a rent service or rent charge he is If the Lord accepts the rent or service of the Feoffee he loses the arrerages in the time of the Feoffor though he makes no acquittance for after such acceptance he shall not avow upon the Feoffor at all nor upon the Feoffee but for the arrerages which incurred in his time otherwise where the Feoffor dyes and there is such an acceptance But acceptance of rent or service by
the wrong but that the said Bill shall remaine alwayes of record to their infamy and here no murther or piracy can be punished upon any Bill exhibited in English but he ought to have beene indicted and therefore he hath not onely mistaken the Court but also the nature of exhibiting the Bill hath not appearance of any ordinary course of justice but no action lyes upon an appeale of murder returnable in the Common Bench for though the Writ is not returned before competent Judges who may doe justice yet 't is in nature of a lawfull Suite namely by Writ of appeale wherefore judgement was given for the Plaintiffe And in a Writ of error in the Chequer Chamber brought by Wood 't was resolved that Sir R. B. might have had a good action but here because the action was not upon the Bill exhibited at Westminster but because he said in the County of S. that his Bill was true In auditu quamplurimorum without expressing the said matters in particular so that it was not any Slaunder judgement was reversed Stanhopp and Bliths Case 27. of the Queene fo 15. MAster Stanhopp who was a surveyor of the Dutchy and had divers Offices and was a justice of peace Hath but one Mannor and that he hath gotten by swearing and forswearing Resolved that the action doth not lye for they are too generall and words which charge any one in an action in which damages shall be recovered ought to have convenient certainty and he doth not charge the Plaintiffe with swearing c. and he may recover a Mannor by swearing c. yet not procuring or assenting to it Resolved if one charge another that he hath forsworne himselfe no action lyes First because he may be forsworne in usuall communication Quia benignior sensus in verbis generalibus seu dubijs est praeferenda Secondly it is an usuall word of passion and choller as also to call another a Villaine a Rogue or Varlet these and such like will not mayntaine Action Boni judicis interest lites derimere But if one say to another that he is perjured or that he hath forsworne himselfe in such a Court c. For these words an Action will lye Hext Justice of Peace against Yeomans 27. of the Queene fo 15. FOr my ground in H. Hext seekes my life and if I could finde one J. H. I doe not doubt but within two dayes to arrest Hext for suspicion of felony Adjudged that no action lyes for the first words 1. Because he may seeke his life lawfully upon just cause and his land may be holden of him 2. 'T is too generall and the Law inflicts no punishment for seeking of his life but adjudged that the action lyes for the last words for for suspicion of felony he shall be imprisoned and his life in question Birchleys case 27. 28. of the Queene fo 16. THe Defendant said to B. Clerke of the Kings Bench and sworne to deale duely without corruption you are well knowne to be a corrupt man and to deale corruptly Adjudged that the action lyes 1. Because the words Ex causa dicendi imply that he hath dealt corruptly in his profession Et sermo relatus ad personam intelligi debet de conditione personae 1. This touches the Plaintiffe in his oath 2. The words Scandalize him in the duty of his profession by which he gets his living Skinner of London said that Manwood was a corrupt Judge adjudged actionable Resolved in this case that if the precedent parlance had beene that B. was a usurer or executor of another and would not performe the will and upon this the Defendant had spoken the words following no action would lye Weaver and Caridens case 37. of the Queene fo 16. AAjudged that no action lyes for saying that the Plaintiffe was detected for perjury in the Starre-chamber for an honest man may be detected but not convicted Stuckley and Bulheads case 44. and 45. of the Queene fo 16. ADjudged that an action lyes for saying Master St. he was a Justice of peace covereth and hideth felonies and is not worthy to be a Justice of peace for this is against his oath and his office and a good cause to put him out of Commission and for that he may be indicted and fined Snagg and Gees case 39. of the Queene fo 16. THou hast killed my wife and art a traytor Adjudged that the action will not lye for the wife was in life as appeared in the Declaration and so the words vaine and no scandall otherwise if shee had beene dead Eaton and Allens case 40. of the Queene fo 16. HE is a brabler and a quarreller for he gave his Champion counsell to make a Deed of gift of his goods to kill me and then to fly out of the Country but God preserved me Resolved that the action will not lye for the purpose without act is not punishable and though he may be punished for such conspiracy in the Star-chamber yet this is by the absolute power of the Court not by ordinary course of Law Observe well this case and the cause and reason of this Judgement Anne Davies case 35. of the Queene fo 16. THe Defendant said to B. a Suitor to the Plaintiffe and with whom there was neare an agreement of marriage I know Davies daughter well she did dwell in Cheapside and a Grocer did get her with childe and the Plaintiffe declared that by reason thereof the said B. refused to take her to wife Resolved the action lyes for a woman is punishable for a Bastard by 18. of the Queene ca. 3. And though that fornication c. is not examinable by our Law because done in secret and uncomely openly to be examined yet the having a Bastard is apparant and examinable by the said Act. Resolved if the Plaintiffe had been charged with nude incontinency onely the action lyes for the ground of the action is temporall viz. the defeating of her advancement in marriage By Popham an action lyes for saying that a woman Inholder had a great infectious disease by which shee loses her guests Banister and Banisters case 25. of the Queene Resolved that an action lyes for saying to the sonne and heire that he was a Bastard for this tends to his disinherison but resolved if the Defendant pretend that the Plaintiffe is a Bastard and he himselfe right heire no action lyes and this the Defendant may shew by way of barre Jeames case 41. 42. of the Queene fo 17. THe Defendant said to B. Hang him innuendo praedict J he is full of the pox innuendo the French pox c. Resolved two things are requisite to have an action for slander 1. That the person scandalized be certaine 2. That the scandall be apparent by the words themselves And therefore if a man says that one of the servants of B. is a notorious felon or traytor an action lyes not if he have more servants and innuendo cannot make it certain
of the intire blood shall have it not the younger sonne Resolved though a Copy-holder in judgement of Law hath but an estate at will yet custome hath so established and fixed his estate that by the custome of the Mannor 't is descendable to his heires and is not meerely ad voluntatem Domini but c. secundum consuetudinem manerij so the custome is the soule and life of Copy-holds See the booke at large of what antiquity Copy-holds are and some generall learning concerning them Resolved when custome hath created such inheritances the Law shall direct the descent according to the Maximes and rules of the common Law as incident to every estate descendable When uses had gained a reputation of inheritances the Law directed the descent and of them there shall be a possessio fratris But resolved that such customary inheritances shall not have any collaterall qualities which doe not concerne descent of inheritance which other inheritances have and therefore they shall not be assets to the heire upon an obligation nor there shall not be Dower nor tenancy by the Curtesie nor a descent shall toll entry c. For as without custome they cannot descend so without custome they cannot have a collaterall quality for Copy-holders have inheritances secundum quid viz. to descend to the heires and not to be determined by the will of the Lord not simplicitèr to a collaterall quality Resolved that the heire before admittance may take the profits and may surrender to the use of another before admittance but this shall not prejudice the Lord for his Fine upon the descent and he is a tenant by Copy of Court-roll for the roll made to his auncestor belongs to him and admittance of tenant for life shall serve for the remainder yet it shall not prejudice the Lord for his Fine And though 't was objected that every admittance amounts to a grant and so may be pleaded and therefore nothing vests before admittance yet 't was resolved that as after admittance the heire may in pleading alledge this as a grant and this to avoyde inconveniences for if he should be compelled to shew the first grant it was before time of memory and so not pleadable or if within memory then the custome failes yet he may alledge the admittance of his auncestor as a grant and shew the descent to him and that he enterd and this without admittance but he cannot plead that his Father was seised c. by Copy c. and dyed seised and that this descended c. For in truth 't is but a particular estate at will in judgement of Law though descendable by custome Ryvets case 24. of the Queene fo 22. A Greed that a husband shall not be tenant by the Curtesie of a Copy-hold without speciall custome Deale and Rigdens case 36. of the Queene fo 23. ADjudged that if a recovery be in plaint in nature of a reall action against tenant in taile admitting Copy-hold may be intailed that this is a discontinuance for in as much as plaints are warranted by custome 't is incident that it should make a discontinuance The like judgement was between Clun and Pease Bullock and Dibleys case 35. of the Queene fo 23. REsolved that a surrender by the husband is no discontinuance to the wife nor her heires And if a Copy-holder for life surrender to the use of another in fee this is no forfeiture for it doth not passe by livery And Copy-holders have not such quality without speciall custome so also adjudged in severall cases Gravenus and Teds case 35. of the Queene fo 23. REsolved that the descent of a Copyhold doth not toll entry and that where the custome was that he may grant in fee simple that he may by the same custome grant to a man and the heires of his body for be it a fee simple conditionall or a taile 't is within the custome so of a grant for life or yeares for fee simple includes them Fitch and Huckleys case 36. of the Queene fo 23. REsolved that admittance of a Copyholder for life is an admittance of him in remainder but not to prejudice the Lord for his Fine And that upon a surrender to the use of himselfe for life and after to the use of his last will that the fee remaines in the Copy-holder not in the Lord. Clarke and Pennifathers case 26. of the Queene of 23. REsolved that the heire of a Copyholder may enter and have trespas before admission and if the heire as the principall case was dye before admission his heire may take the profits and have trespas And Wray said that 't was adjudged that there shall be possessio fratris of it Resolved that where H. 8. granted a Mannor to the Queene for life that the Queene was a sole person exempted by common law and may make a lease or grant without the King and may plead and be impleaded and that 32. H. 8. is but a declaration of the common Law Adjudged that a grant of a Copyhold in fee escheated to her by the Queene tenant for life bindes the King his heires and successors for she was domina pro tempore and the custome of the Mannor bindes the King And that every one who hath a lawfull interest in a Mannor c. though but at will may grant Copyholds escheated c. rendring the auncient rent customes and services and this shall binde the Lord for he is dominus pro tempore For a Copyholder derives not his interest out of the estate of the Lord onely but out of the custome and the grantee is in by that without regard to the estate or person of the grantor and therefore such a grant by the husband shall binde the wife so of Infants non compos mentis Bishop Prebend Parson shall binde for ever for the custome is that the tenements are parcell of the Mannor and demised and demisable c. But the Lord must have a lawfull estate for if a disseisor or Feoffee of a disseisor c. makes such grants this shall not binde him that hath right after a recontinuance of the Mannor but admittances by such upon a surrender or of the heire shall binde c. for they are lawfull quodam modo judiciall acts which to doe he may be compelled in a Court of equity P. 26. of the Queene fo 24. ADjudged if a Lord takes wife and a Copyholder for life according to the custome dyes and the Lord regrants for lives and dyes that the wife in Dower shall not avoyde these grants for though the grant were after the title of Dower yet the custome was before If a Feoffee upon condition makes a voluntary grant the condition is broken the Feoffor reenters the grant shall stand Rous and Arters case 29. of the Queene fo 24. ADjudged that if tenant pur auter vie of a Mannor after the death of cestuy que vie continues in and holds Courts and makes voluntary grants this shall not
construed shall or might be leavyed and so 't was holden of a Lease or limittation of a use otherwise he which is to leavy the Summe by deferring to doe it may exclude the reversioner for ever see the Booke at large Resolved when the heire or reversioner c. enters and expulses him to whom the Land is limitted he hath election to recover the Mesne profits in an action or reentry and retainer till he leavyes the inteir Summe and the other shall not have advantage of his owne wrong and if a stranger had entered and occupied the Devisee ought to have taken notice at his perill for Vigilantibus non c. and none is bound to give notice but here the Heire himselfe concealed the will and the Devisee had no remedy for the Mesne profits after the death of the heire Resolved that a Gardian shall not ouste Tenant for life nor yeares of the Tenement Resolved that admitting the Gardian shall ouste Tenant for yeares yet he shall not hold over because his terme is certaine in the commencement continuance and end otherwise of Tenant by Elegit Statute c. they shall hold over because the terme is uncertaine Southcots Case 43. Eliz. in banco regis fo 83. IF A. doe deliver goods to B. for to keepe the goods be purloyned away yet B. shall be charged in a Writ of detinue For to keepe and to keepe safely is all one but if B. doe take them to keepe as his owne goods he shall not be charged with them And if A. doe pledge or Guage goods unto B. in this Case B. shall not answer for them if they be purloyned for he had some property in them and not a custody onely but a ferryman a common Inkeeper or a Carrier which taketh hyre they ought to keepe the goods safely and they shall not be discharged if they be stollen or purloyned But a Factor or a Servant although he have wages doing his indeavour shall not be charged Luttreles Case 43. Eliz. in banco regis fo 86. IF a man have estovers eyther by grant or prescription to his house although he alter the Rooms and Chambers in his House it seemeth that the alteration of the qualities so as it be not of the house it selfe and without making new Chimnyes by which no prejudice accrewes to the owners of the Wood is not any destruction of the prescription and though he make new Chimnyes or make a new addition to his old house he shall not loose his prescription thereby but he may imploy or spend any of his new estovers in the Chimnyes or in that part newly added It was also resolved that if a House or Milne doe fal or be taken downe by the act of the owner or by wrong of another yet for that the perdurable part which includes all doth remaine which is the Land whereupon the Fabrick is built he may reedifie the same againe without any Losse of his apendant or apurtenant but it ought to be upon the same place which was the Foundation of the old House for as it did support and in judgement of Law included the ancient house when it was standing so it supports and includes the new house so as it is in a manner a continuance of the ancient house Diverse Tenants doe hold of another as of his Mannor by fealty and suite to the Lords Milne the Lord doth alien his Milne with the suite of his Tenants and after the vendor dyeth and his Sonne entereth and buildeth a new Milne upon the other part of his demeane he shall have the suite to his owne Milne which the Vendee had before for the suite belongeth to him that hath the Mannor for no man may have suite to his milne by reason of a Tenure If it be not of Corne growing upon the Lands within the Seigniory or Mannor and the Lord may erect a new Milne within any part of the Mannor and the Tenure is due to the same and not to any particular Milne Druries Case 43. Eliz. Error in Banco Regis fo 84. A Countesse being a Widdow retaineth three Chaplaines he who is last reteined is not capable of a dispensation for the Statue of 21. H. 8. c. 13. is executed by reteining of two and the reteining of the third shall not devest the capacity which was in the first two but if the reteiner had beene at one time he who is first promoted shall be first preferred because in Aequali jure c. 2. Resolved if the two first die the third is not capable of dispensation without a new reteiner because he was reteined at the common Law and not according to the Statute Quod ab initio non valet c. As if the Sonne and Heire of a Baron reteineth a Chaplaine and giveth him Letters under his Seale and after the Father dyeth And it was said that the said Act shall be taken strictly as if a Baron be made Gardian of the 5. parts he shall reteine no more Chaplains then before and if a Baron retaine two Chaplaines who are promoted he cannot discharge them and reteine others during their lives Slades Case 44. Eliz. fo 92. IT was resolved that every contract executory imports in it selfe an assumpsit For when one doth agree to pay money or to deliver any thing by that he doth assume and promise to pay or to deliver the things and therefore when he selleth any goods to another and agreeth to deliver them at a day to come and the other in consideration thereof agreeth to pay so much money at such a day in this case both parties may have an Action of Debt or Action upon the case upon the assumpsit for the mutuall executory agreement of both parties import in themselves as well a reciprocall Action upon the Case as an action of debt and a recovery or barr in an action of debt is a good Barre in an action upon the Case brought upon the same contract and so likewise in an Action upon the Case a recovery or Barre in the same is a good plea in an Action of Debt upon the same contract The Defendant in an Action of the Case upon the assumpsit may not wage his Law as he may doe in an action of Debt If a Summe of money be promised in Marriage to be paid at severall dayes an Action upon the assumpsit lyeth for non payment of the first although no Action of Debt lyeth untill all the dayes be past Multitudo errantium non parit errori patrocinium and if the Debtor of the King sueth by Quo minus in the Exchequor the defendant shall not have his Law for the benefit of the King Adams and Lamberts Case 44. and 45. Eliz. in banco Regis in Ejectione firmae fo 104. UPon consideration of the Statute of 1 E. 6. cap. 14. it was resolved 1. That if one demise to any of his Kindred to superstitious uses although he limit them to pay certaine Summes of
The question was whether they have an estate for life or an inheritance in taile And it was resolved that if they had children at the time of the Demise made then they had but an estate for life But if they had no children then they had an estate of inheritance in taile Sir Edward Cleeres case 42. Eliz. fol. 17. A Man is seized of three acres of Land houlden in Capite and maketh a Feoffment in Fee of two of them to the use of his wife for her life and after maketh a feoffment by Deed of the third acre to the use of such persons and of such estate and estates as he should limitt and appoint by his last Will in writing And afterwards by his last Will in writing hee Devised the said third acre to one in fee and if this Devise was good for all the third acre or not or for two parts thereof or voyd for all was the question And it was adjudged that the Devise was good For the Feoffor by his last Will limitted the estates according to his power reserved to him upon the Feoffment the estates should take effect by force of the Feoffment and the use is directed by the Will So as in this case the Will is onely directory But if he declared his Will by writing without any reference to his authoritie or power as owner of the Land and to limitt no use according to his power In this case the Land being houlden in capite the Devise is good for two parts and voyd for the third part If a man make a Feoffment in Fee of Lands in capite to the use of his last Will although he Devise the Land with reference to the Feoffment yet the Will is voyd for a third part for a Feoffment to the use of his last Will and to the use of him and his heires is all one In this case when the partie had conveyed two parts to the use of his wife by his act executed hee cannot as owner of the Land Devise any part of the residue by his Will and therefore because he hath not an election as in the case put before whether to limit according to his power or Devise the same as owner of the Land for in the case at Barre as owner of the Land having conveyed two parts to the use of his wife he cannot make any Devise The Devise of necessitie must inure to a limitation of the use otherwise the Devise should be altogether voyd Packmans case 37. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 18. WIlson brought an action upon the case upon a trover against Packman The case was thus A man dyed intestate and the Ordinary committed the administration to a stranger and after the next of kindred of the Decedent sued out a Citatiō in the Court Christian to have it repealed and pendente lite the administrator to defeate the plaintiffe selleth the goods of the decedent to the defendant and after the Letters of administration were revoked by sentence and the first sentence anulled and made voyd and the administration granted to the plaintiffe And it was resolved that the action did not lie and in this case the diversitie was houlden betweene a suite by Citation for to countermand or revoke the former administration and an appeale which is alwayes a reversing of a former sentence for an appeale doth suspend the former sentence otherwise of a Citation And in this case because the first administrator had the absolute propertie of the goods in him without question he may sell them to whom he will and although the administration be revoked afterwards yet that cannot defeat the Sale But if the sale or gift be by covine it is voyd against Creditors by the Statute of 13. El. but it is good against a second administrator And if an administrator wast the goods and afterwards the administration is granted to another yet every debtor shall charge him in debt An administration may be granted upon condition and whatsoever the administrator doth before the condition broken is good Gregories case 38. El. Banco Regis fol. 20. VErba aequivoca in dubio posita intelliguntur in digniori potentiori sensu secundum excellentiam as if the speech be or writing of J. S. generally it shall be intended of the father where the father and sonne are both of a name and if it be of two Brothers both of a name it shall be intended of the eldest for these are more worthy so where the Statute of 4. 5. Phil. Ma. speaketh in any Court of Record it shall be intended of the foure Courts at Westminster because the Kings Attorney is attendant there Michelbornes case 38. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 21. THe Court of Marshalsea doth onely hould plea of actions of trespasse within the verge if the one of the parties be of the Kings houshold and in contracts and Covenants where both parties are of the Kings houshold and of none other actions nor persons by the Act of Articuli super Chartas 28. E. 1. Butler Goodalls case 40. El. Banco Regis fol. 21 IT was resolved upon the Statute of 21. H. 8. that a Parson of a Church ought to stay and be Commorant upon his Rectorie viz. upon the Parsonage-house and not in any other house although it be within the Parish but lawfull imprisonment without covine is a good excuse of non-residence also if there be no Parsonage-house for impotentia excusat Legem also sicknesse without fraud if the patient remove by advice of his Councell in Physicke bona fide for better aire and recovery of his health Ambrosia Gorges case 40. El. fol. 22. in Cur. Wardorum IT was resolved that the Father shall have the Wardship of his Daughter and heire apparent so long as shee continueth his heire apparent But when the Father hath issue a sonne then shee shall be in ward to the Queene for then he is heire apparant and not the Daughter Ambrosia was daughter of Sir Arthur Gorge by Douglas Daughter and heire of Vicount Bindon and was married to Francis Gorge which Francis dyed when Ambrosia was of ten yeares of age It was resolved also that the Queene notwithstanding the said marriage should have the Wardship of the said Ambrosia for it was not a compleat marriage because to every marriage there ought to be a consent For consensus non concubitus facis matrimonium consentire non possunt ante annos nubiles And upon conference had with the Civilians it was agreed after such a marriage if the husband and the wife marry again it shall not be counted Bigamie And 30. E. 1. tit Gard. 156. if the ancestor marry his heire infra annos nubiles and dye the Lord shall recover the body of the Infant because the heire may disagree It was agreed that the grandfather shall not have the wardship of the sonne within age the father being dead in his life time Marquesse of Winchester his case 41. Eliz. fol. 23.
none will buy their Wardships 5. After Tender and refusall if the heire be made Knight and marry he shall not forfeite the double value because he is out of Ward but immediatly the Lord shall have a Writte de valore maritagij This was the last Case that Sir John Popham chiefe Justice of England c. ever Argued Sir George Cursons case 7. Jac. Cur. Wardor fol. 75. SIr W. L. seised of a reversion expectant upon taile made to his sonne of land in Capite Covenants to stand seised to the use of his neece the sonne dyeth the King shall not have primier seisin 1. Resol It was Collusion apparent within the Statute of Marlebr cap. 6. to infeoffe the heire apparent and if he infeoffe others upon Collusion averrable but no averrement shall be where the remainder or reversion is left in a stranger or upon a Devise 2. Or otherwise to dispose in the Statute of 32. H. 8. have relation to wills onely for before the Statute every man might dispose of his lands by act executed 3. The Clause in the said Statute which saveth primier seisin to the King hath relation onely to acts executed for the King shall have without that primier seisin of the third part not devised but without that he shall not have it of any part conveyed by act executed 4. If the grandfather convey land to the sonne living the father this is out of the Statute otherwise if the father be dead and so a gift to a Collaterall Kinsman who is not heire apparent is out of the Statute for none will by intendment disinherit his heire to defeate the King of the Wardship or primer seisin and so is the experience of the Court of Wards Bullens case 5. Jacobi Com. Banco fol. 77. THe Lord may have a certeine summe pro certo letae for it shall be intended it was granted at the first by purchase of the Leete for the ease of the Tenants and in consideration of the Lords claiming of it at his owne costs every Eyre The issue was if the plaintiffe was a chiefe pledge and by speciall verdict he was found a Resiant and certified by the chiefe pledges to be a chiefe pledge and was amerced for his default It seemeth he was not Sed materia praedicta consopita fuit in arbitrio See 30. E. 3.23 of franke pledges Lord Abergavenies case Com. Banco fol. 78. A Judgement in an action of Debt is had against a joyntenant for life who afterwards releaseth to his companion all the right c. yet that moytie is liable to the Judgement and so it is of a rent charge during the life of the Releasor Sir Edward Phyttons case Com. Banco fol. 79. EXecutors may take benefit of the Kings generall pardon by which is enacted that all Subjects of the King their heires Successors Executors and Administrators shall be acquitted and discharged of all offences contempts c. and that shall be expounded most beneficially for the Subject And further doth give and grant all goods Chattells Debts c. forfeited And prohibiteth any Clerke to make out any Writte c. Provided that every Clerke may make forth cap. ut at the suite of the plaintiffe against persons outlawed to the intent to compell them to answer and that the partie shall sue forth a scir fac before the pardon in that behalfe shall be allowed which is as much to say having regard onely to the plaintiffe But in regard of the King it is an absolute pardon and grant of his goods and he is a person inabled against the King but not against the partie plaintiffe And every person by himselfe or his Atturney may plead this act for discharge Executors shall have restitution upon the Statute 21. H. 8. Also Administrators shall have a Writt of error upon the Statute 27. El as was adjudged in the Lord Mordants case 36. El. And yet these Statutes speake onely of the partie and not of the Executors or Administrators because no Writt can be against Executors they may plead it without Processe The End of the Sixth Booke THE SEAVENTH BOOK Postnati Calvins case 6. Jacobi Banco Regis fol. 1. R C. By his gardian bringeth an assize the defendants say the plaintiffe ought not to be answered Quia est alienigena natus 5o. Novembris Anno Domini Regis Angliae c. tertio apud E. infra regnum Scotiae ac infra ligeanciam Domini Regis Regni sui S. ac extra ligeanciam Regni sui Angl. c. the plaintiffe demurreth The Case was Adjourned into the Exchequer Chamber and was argued by two Justices every day and by the Chancellour and resolved by the Chancellour and all the Justices except Walmesley and Foster that the plaintiffe ought to be answered For these six demonstrative Conclusions drawne from the Law of Nature the Law of the Land Reasons of State and Authorities of Records and Booke Cases 1 Every one that is an Alien by birth may be or might have been an Enemy by accident but C. could never be an Enemy by any accident whatsoever ergo no Alien by birth 2. Whosoever are borne under one naturall ligeance due by the Law 〈◊〉 nature to one Soveraigne are naturall borne Subjects But C. was borne under one c. ergo a naturall borne Subject 3. Whosoever is borne within the Kings protection is no Alien But C. was borne under c ergo he is no Alien 4. Every stranger borne must at his birth be either amicus or inimicus but C. at his birth could neither be amicus nor inimicus because he was subditus ergo no stranger borne 5. Whatsoever is due by the Law of man may be altered but naturall legeance of the Subject to the Soveraigne cannot be altered ergo not due by mans Law Lastly whosoever at his birth cannot be an alien to the King of E. cannot be an alien to any of his Subjects of E. but C. at his birth could be no alien to the King of E. Ergo he cannot be an alien to any of the Subjects of E. the Maior and Minor both be Propositiones perspicuè verae and although Alienigena dicitur ab aliena gente yet that is all one as Alienae ligeantiae and arguments drawne from Etymologie are feeble for Saepenemero ubi proprietas verborum attenditur sensus veritatis amittitur yet when they agree with Law Judges may use them for Ornament and dâ—verse inconveniences would follow if the Plea against the Plaintiffe should be allowed For first it maketh legeance locall wereupon should follow first that legeance which is universall should be confined within locall limits 2. That the Subject should not be bound to serve the King in Peace or in Warre out of those bounds 3. It should illegitimate many which were borne in Gascayne Guyan Normandy c. and diverse others of his Majesties Dominions whilst the same were in actuall obedience And lastly this strange and new devised Plea inclineth too much to
make a Lease for yeares and after enter into the Land and make wast and the Lessor recover in an Action of wast against the Lessee for life he shall avoid the Lease for yeares made before the wast committed But if a Lessee for life make a Lease for yeares and after enter and make a feoffement in fee the Lessor shall not avoid the Lease for yeares and so if a Tenant make a Lease for yeares and after is attainted of felony or dyeth without heire the Lord by escheate shall not avoide the tearme But because the feoffement in the case at barre was executed by Letter of Attourney it was resolved to be void and the Land escheated to the Queene Jehu Webbes Case 6. Jacobi com banco fo 45. THe King grants the office of the Kings Tennis plaies at W. to one who being disseised brings an assize The Patent shall have a reasonable construction not onely when the King himselfe playes but when any of his Houshould As if a Commission be made to take Singing-Boys in a Cathedrall-Church for the Kings Chappell those that Sing there for their pleasure cannot be taken but such as get their living by it There were but two manner of assizes at the common Law assizes De libero tenemento and De communia pasturae but for no other common but for this onely there is a Writ in the Register But the Statute of W. 2. c. 25. giveth it De proficuo in certo loco capiendo in lieu of a Quod permittat and although that there offices amongst other things are named yet an assize lay of an office at the common Law and although that no Tenant for life may have a Quod permittat yet an assize did lye for him but that is to be understood of an office of profit for it lyeth not of an office of charge Originall Writs made by Statute cannot be altered without Statute In an assize of a new office it ought to be shewed what profit belongs to it but not for an ancient office because that is sufficiently knowne Syms Case 6. Jacobi fo 51. TEnant in taile levyeth a fine with warranty and dyeth the warranty discends upon the issue of him in the remainder inheritable to the taile and another the issue in taile brings a formedon and is barred for all for the warranty is intire and barreth every one upon whom it discends of all his right as if one seised of three acres maketh a feoffement of one with warranty and dyes having issue two Daughters who make partition the Mother purchaseth the part of one brings dower against the feoffee who Vouches the Daughters shee shall recover all the other acre of the other Daughter if Tenant by the curtesie make a feoffement with warranty and dyes and his Sonne heire of the Feme recovers and assets discends after the feoffee shall have a Scire facias to have the Land first recovered by the Statute of Glouc. c. 3. but if assets descend to the Heire in taile bound with a lyneall warranty after recovery in formedon the Feoffee shall have a Scire facias to have the assets for otherwise if the recoverer alien the assets the issue of him will recover the Land in taile againe but in these cases the discontinuee ought to confesse the title of the Demandant and pray that if assets descend after they may discend unto him for if he plead a warranty and assets this is peremptory unto him if it be found that assets did not discend for the Statute is that a Scire facias shall issue out of the rolls of the Justices and in this case there is no ground for the Scire facias in the Record but in this case if the issue in taile pleads no assets and assets are found but not to the value the tenant shall have a Scire facias to recover the assets discended after for that false plea of the Vouchee Warranty and estoppell discend upon the heire generall and warranty barreth although that he upon whom it discends claimeth not by him that made it but so doth not an estoppell but estoppells with recompence binde the right of one who claimeth not by him that made it Roger Earle of Rutlands Case 6. Jacobi fo 55. THe King grants the pannage and herbage of a Park to M. for life and reciting this grants it to the Earle of Rutland for his life 1. Resolved the King hath three manner of inheritances 1. Some which he cannot excercise himselfe and cannot grant them in reversion or remainder as Corodies and Churches of which he is Patron 2. Others which he cannot excercise himselfe but may grant them in reversion or remainder as offices 3. Others which he may excercise himselfe and may grant as Lands Houses c. 2. The King here is not deceived for when he reciteth here that M. had for life and grants for life this inureth as by Law it may that is as a grant in reversion 3. In this case the grant to the Earle shall commence after the determination of the estate of M. and if the King grants Land to one and his Heires Habendum to him and his Assignes it is good and the Habendum shall be rejected for the honour of the King See the Lord Chandos case in the sixth Booke and when a Charter of the King may be taken to two intents good in many cases it shall be taken to such intent as is most beneficiall for the King but if it may be taken to one intent good and to another void then for the honour of the King and benefit of the Subject then it shall be taken so that it may take effect Beechers Case 6. Jacobi fo 58. B. Plaintiffe in Debt Se retraxit by attourney and by the judgement is not amerced he brings eror 1. Resolved a Retraxit ought to be in proper person for at the common Law every one who appeared ought to come in proper person and make his attorney after by license of the Court but if it be without writ he cannot without a writ of Attornato faciendo In cases where one may make an attourney but for contempt is bound to appeare in person if he appeare by attourney this is not error because the court may dispens with the contempt otherwise where he cannot appeare by Law by attorney as here for if he appeare by attourny this is error 2. B. ought to be amerced if upon a Nonsuite a Fortiori upon a Retraxit and although it is for his advantage yet he may assigne it for error because the judgement is not perfect and because it is for the advantage of the King and it shall not be amended because the act of the Court. 3. Where one disclaimes he shall not have a Writ of error because he hath confessed that he had no right otherwise it is upon a Retraxit for this is but a barre of the action à fortiori here where it wat void done by an attourney
a Retraxit ought to be when the party is supposed to be present therefore it shall not be when he imparleth Swaynes Case 6. Jac. fo 63. 1. REsolved the King grants a Mannor for life except Timber Trees the Lessees grant copy-hold the Grantees may shrowde Timber Trees because they come in by custome Paramount the exception 2. If Copyholders prescribe to take profit in any part of the Mannor if the Lord aliens it a Copy-holder admitted after shall have it because he is in paramount the severance but he shall prescribe and plead specially that is untill such a time Viz. Before the severance Talis habebatur c. consuetudo c. and then shew the severance Sir William Fosters Case 6. Jac. fo 64. C. F made a feoffement 4. E. 6. reserving a rent charge which rent descends to T. F. who dyes intestate his administrators avow for it and alleadge no seisin within 40 yeares yet good for the Statute of 32. H. 8. c. 3. that none shall avow for rent if he had not seisin within 40. yeares is to be intended when it was necessary to alledge as upon rent betwixt very Lord and Tenant for this may be had by incroachment and perhaps the comencement of the Seigniory was before time of memory but where rent is by deede or reservation as here or upon an estate taile the seisin is not materiall for the deed or reservation is the Title and incroachment shall not hurt and they shall not have a Ne injuste vexes but shall avoide it in an avowry and Magna Charta c. 10. Quod nullus distringatur ad faciendum majus servitium c. doth not extend to donee in taile Lessee for life c. but is intended betweene very Lord and very Tenant Lovedayes Case 6. Ja. fo 65. IF a Jury who appeareth to try a certaine issue give a verdict which is accepted be it perfect or imperfect they are discharged and shall not trie the same issue upon a new Nisi prius but a Venire facias de novo shall issue otherwise it is of the Recognitors of an assize they shall trie all the issue because they are not to trie any certeine issue and because they come in upon an Originall the Court will not award a new Originall but the Plaintiffe shall have a Certificate of assize to trie the imperfections the Plaintiffe sueth a Venire facias against diverse the Sheriffe returneth no Writ the Plaintiffe shall not have severall Venire facias after for he cannot vary from the first Crogates Case 6. Jacobi fo 66. THe Defendant pleads in barre to trespasse that the B. of N. leased by Copy to W. M. to which copyhold there is common in B. and justifieth as Servant to the said W. the Plaintiffe replies De injuria sua propria c. this is an insufficient replication for De injuria c. hath reference to all the plea in barre and not to the Commandement Ergo if the Defendant in false Imprisonment justifie for that a Capias was awarded to the Sheriffe who made a warrant to him to take the Plaintiffe De injuria c. is no plea because it referreth to all and so Record shall be tried by Jury but he shall traverse the Warrant which is matter in fact but this had beene a good plea if the proceeding be in a Court which is not of Record 2. De injuria c. is to be pleaded where the plea is matter of excuse and not where he claims an interest in his owne right or in the right of his Master for there he shall traverse the Commandement 3. Where authority is derived from the Plaintiffe himselfe or is given by Law as to fee if wast the Plaintiffe ought to answer to it although no interest be claimed and he shall not plead De injuria c. 4. If this plea be admitted here all parts of the plea in barre shall be tried and the issue will be full of multiplicity Trollop Case 6. Jacobi fo 68. THe Defendant in error pleads excommunication c. and sheweth the Certificat of the Vicar generall de D. the words of which were Vniversis clericis literatis per totam diocesim D. the Plaintiffe pleads the generall pardon 3. Jac. 1. Resolved the officiall cannot certifie excommunication for none shall doe that but he to whom the Court may Write to assoile the party as the Bishop and Chancellour of C. or O. and for that if a Bishop certifie and dye Before the returne of the Writ it shall not be received but the Successor shal doe it and one Bishop shall not certifie an Excommunication made by a Bishop in another Court but a Bishop after Election before Consecration may and so may the Vicar generall if it appeare that the Bishop is in Remotis agendis 2. The Certificat is insufficient because by the particular direction to the Clerks of D. the Kings Court and all others are excluded and so a protection in one Court serveth not in another and Excommunication is such a thing as the Court of the King hath conusance and therefore the Suite and the Cause are to be expressed in the Certificat that the Kings Court may judge of the sufficiency and if it be insufficient as if a Bishop certifie an excommunication made by himselfe in his owne Cause the Court may write to absolve him If the Certificat had beene good the point was whither the generall pardon dischargeth an excommunication or not Whitlocks Case 6. Jacobi fo 69. A Revertioner upon an estate for life levys a fine to the use of himselfe untill Marriage of his Sonne and then to the use of himselfe for life with power to make Leases so that they exceede not 21. yeares or three lives reserving the ancient rent the remainder to his Sonne in fee the Sonne is Marryed the Father maketh a Lease for 99. yeares if two shall so long live reserving rent to him his heires and the reversioners this is a good Lease 1. Resolved he had pursued his authority for if he had a perticular power to make Leases for 21. yeares or three lives he cannot make leases determinable upon lives but having a generall power to make Leases so that they doe not exceede 21. years or three lives he may 2. The rent reserved goeth to the Sonne although that he who reserved it had but for life because the Lease for yeares hath no being out of the Lease for Life but out of the Fee and in judgement of Law preceedeth both in construction upon the limitation of uses but the most safe way here had beene to reserve the rent generally and lest it to the distribution of the Law Greenelyes Case 7. Jacobi fo 71. BAron and Feme Tenants in speciall taile the Baron infeoffeth P. G. and dieth the Feme dyes the Sonne enters and Leaseth to the Plaintiffe 1. Resolved if Baron joyntenant in speciall taile with his Wife had made a Feoffement or had beene
disseissed at the common ley and dyed and the Feme before entry dyed this is a discontinuance to the Sonne because he cannot enter as Heire to both but if the Feme enter the discontinuance is purged 2. The estate which the Feme had jointly with her Baron is within the purviewe of the Statute of 32. H. 8. c. 28. That no fine levyed by the Baron sole of Lands of the Feme shall hurt her and within the Statute of West 2. c. 3. 3. The entry of the Sonne is lawfull although he claimes not as heire to the Feme as the Statute speakes but as heire to both because he is within these words or to such as have right by the death of such Wife and this is to be intended of discontinuances made by the Baron and not of a rightfull barre of the issue for they cannot avoide it and the Statute is that they may enter which they cannot doe where they are barred and if the Feme enter within 5. yeares as shee may after a Fine levyed by the Baron this doth not take away the future barre of the issue and if shee enter not within 5. yeares shee also is barred Baron tenant in taile the remainder to the Feme in taile makes a feoffement the Feme may enter after his death by this Statute but if the Baron suffer a recovery she shall not enter in the Case at barre the son may have a Formedon at the common Law and where before this Statute a Cuj in vita or Sur cuj in vita did lye entry is given by this Statute and not otherwise The Lord Staffords Case 7. Jacobi fo 73. THe Queene revertioner upon an estate taile grants the revertion to T. T. in taile upon condition is to have Praedictam reversionem in fee the condition is performed the Lord Stafford Tenant in taile levyeth a fine his issue is barred 1. Resolved that a condition of accruer may be annexed to a thing which lyeth in grant and to an estate taile as if Lessee for life be the remainder for life with condition of accruer to the first this is good and yet no Merger of estate 4. things are requisit to an accruer 1. A particular estate as the Foundation Ergo a Lease at will shall not be 2. The estate ought to continue in the Grantee untill accruer therefore if the Grantee alien and repurchase the condition is Tolled but Quaere if the Tenant alien upon condition which is broken if the fee shall accrew but grantee may grant part of his estate as if Lessee for life make a Lease for yeares he may performe the condition after so may Tenant in speciall taile after he is become tenant in taile after possibility c. so may the surviving jointenant and the heire of Tenant in taile An instant is sufficient to support an accruer as if the condition be if the Lessee be ousted Eo instante that the ouster is the fee accrueth but if Lessee for yeares accept a confirmation for life the condition is gone but it is not necessary that the estate of the grantor or Lessor continue because by his owne act he shall not defeate his grant 3. It ought to vest at the time of the condition performed or never and for that rather that it shall not vest at this time by performance of the condition the fee without office or other ceremony shall be devested out of the King 4. It is necessary that the particular estate and the condition be in one deede or two deeds delivered at the same time for in Law they are but one grant and by the condition performed he had fee from the delivery Resolved Praedict reversionem signifies the reversion which the Queene had Viz. That which depends upon both the estates taile and so was the intent also shee granted Omnia praemissa which maketh it cleere Resolved also that these words Will and Declare doe amount to a grant and are so used in Patents of Liberties and things to take effect in Futuro Tenant in taile the remainder in taile the remainder to the King Tenant in taile suffers a recovery this doth not barre the remainder in taile because the issue in raile is not barred and therefore the revertions and remainders in taile are preserved by the Statute of 34. H. 8. c. 20. Lastly Resolved if the reversion in fee had remained in the Crowne that the fine levyed by Ed Lord Stafford the Father had not barred the Lord that now is Notlyes Case 31. Eliz. com banco Wiat Wields Case 7. Jacobi 78. W. W. seised of Land to which he had common appurtenant aliens 5. acres to one who in replevin counts that he and those whose estate he had in the said 5. acres have had common there c. and good 1. Resolved although by purchase of part of the Land in which c. the common appurtenant is destroyed in all yet it is not so by alienation of part of the Land to which but all remaines without damage to the Tenant of the Land 2. That the pleading of it was sufficient Vinyors Case 7. Jacobi fo 80. ONe was bound to stand to the award of W. R. and revokes the submission the Obligee brings Debt 1. Resolved the Countermand is good for an authority Countermandable by the Law cannot by any way be made irrevocable 2. Although that the Plaintiffe doth not show that the Defendant had given notice to the arbitrator yet it is good because this is implied for without notice the revocation is void 3. The Obligation by the Countermand is forfeited because he doth not stand to c. when he Countermands it 2. By his owne act he had made the condition impossible Ergo the Obligation is single if one bindes himselfe to give License to carry Wood c. for a certaine time if he give it and disturbe him the Obligation is forfeited Sir Richard Pexhalls Case 7. Jacobi fo 83. SIr R. P. seised of Lands part whereof is houlden in Capite deviseth 100. Sheepe 10. Bullocks and 10. l. quarterly to one with clause of distresse and that the Grantee shall hold his Courts for his life for rent arreare for 2. yeares the grantee avoweth 1. Resolved a devise of rent out of all is good and taketh effect out of two parts and as to the third is void 2 The grantee shall have an estate for life in rent and so he shall if it be granted by Deede also by the Intent of the Devisor it appeares that the Grantee shall hold Courts and have 10. l. per annum for his wages and quarterly here had relation to rent onely because the word Et disjoyneth it from Sheep and Bullocks and judgement given for the Avowant Buckmers Case 7. Jac. fo 86. T. B. gave a House in Gavellkinde to M. his Eldest Daughter in taile the remainder of one Moity to J. a second Daughter in taile the remainder of the other Moity to K. a third Daughter in
taile with crosse remainders to J. and K. M. discontinueth and dyeth without issue J. dyeth without issue K. dyeth and her issue brings a Formedon in the remainder and good although severall remainders for they depend upon one estate and commence by gift at one time In actions reall in which title is expressed a man shall not have one Writ for Lands to which he had severall Titles as in escheate cessavit Writ of Mesne c. but he may have a Writ of ward of Land onely although it be by severall Tenures nor one formedon upon two distinct gifts where the foundation is severall but he shall have it if there be one gift although it take effect at severall times because the foundation was joynt and single as upon a gift in taile to Brother and Sister who dye without issue or if the Brother dye without issue and the Sister dye having issue who dyes without issue he to whom the remainder limitted shall have one formedon although it vest at severall times so in an estate taile to Father and Sonne and so here In actions reall founded upon Torte a man shall have one Writ to recover Lands to which he had severall Titles as in an assize a Writ of entry c. but in a Writ of entry upon disseisin made to my Mother and her Sister Coperceners because there title is in the Writ it appeareth he ought to have severall actions but in personall actions one may comprehend severall torts and causes of actions as trespasse for trespasse made at severall dayes and places wast upon severall Leases and so of Debt Nota if a remainder be executed issue in remainder shall not have a formedon in remainder but in the discender and Count of an immediate gift but if there be a Lease for life to one the remainder in taile to A. the remainder in taile to B. A. dyes without issue if B. be chased to his formedon he shall not count of an immediate remainder but shall shew the first remainder to A. and that he is dead without issue 2. In formedon in the remainder or reverter omission of issue inheritable in the pedigree of the demandant abates the Writ but not upon the part of the perticular Tenant 3. The Demandant must make mention of the Sonne who survived the Father to which Son the Land discended but was not seised by force of the taile but he shall name him Sonne but not heire 4. The Demandant in a formedon in the Discender must make himselfe heire to him that was last seised and he to the Donee Note here because K. was never seised the Writ shall say Remanere not descendere and the Writ was Remansit jus because a discontinuance otherwise it should be Tenementa remanserunt Fraunces Case 7. Jac. fo 89. THe Plaintiffe pleads in barre of avowry that R. F. devised to I. his Sonne who leased to him the avowant replyeth that after the devise R. F. made a Feoffement to the use of the said I. upon condition that he shall suffer his Executors to take away his goods and the estate limitted to him was for sixty yeares if he should so long live with diverse remainders over and that after the death of F. I. hindered the Executors to carry away the goods whereupon T. in remainder entered and judgement given for the Plaintiffe 1. Resolv Although the condition be taken strictly the uses to I. onely and to his Heires are onely avoided by it 2. A disturbance by paroll is no Breach of the condition and because the avowant did not shew a speciall disturbance his replication was void 3. I. ought to have notice of the condition being a Stranger to it or otherwise he cannot breake it as a Copy-holder shall not forfeite for denyall of rent to him to whose use a Mannor is transferred before notice but he who bindes himselfe to doe any thing must take notice at his perill because he hath taken it upon him 4. Although that the Title which the Plaintiffe had made in barre to the avowry be destroyed yet he shall have judgement because his count is good and another Title that is to have the Land for sixty yeares by force of the uses declared upon the feoffement is given unto him by the Replication although that the title which he made for himselfe be destroyed yet the Court must adjudge upon all the record and judgement was entered for him accordingly Edward Foxes Case 7. Jacobi fo 93. A Revertioner upon a Lease for life the remainder for life in consideration of 50. l. demiseth granteth c. his reversion for 99. yeares rendering rent this is a bargaine and sale and there needs no attornement for the words of bargaine and sale are not necessary if there are words which tantamount as if at the common Law one had sould his Land an use had beene raised to the Vendee because their intent so appeared so here but if it appeare that their intent was to passe it at the common Law as if a Letter of Attorney be made to make livery the use had not risen and here appeareth their intent to passe it as a bargaine and sale because rent is reserved presently therefore it is reason that he shall have the rents of the particular Tenants presently which cannot be if it passe not by bargaine and sale and inrollment is not necessary because a tearme for yeares onely passeth in this case and â—o freehold See Sir Rowland Heywards Case 2. Report fo 35. Matthew Mannings Case 7. Jacobi fo 94. LEssee for yeares is bound in 200. Markes to W. C. and deviseth to his Wife for life and after her death to M. M and makes his Wife Executrix who agrees and dyeth intestate M. M. enters and takes administration of the goods not administred W. C. brings Debt against him Resolved that M. M. takes by Executory devise and not as a remainder and the estate limmitted to him in construction precedeth the limittation to the Wife as if he had devised that if the Wife die within the terme that then M. M. shall have the residue and also devised it to his Wife for life 2. This case is most strong because a Chattell which may vest and revest at pleasure of the Devisor without mischiefe to the Praecipe 2. A devise of the Terme and Occupation thereof all one Viz. So many yeares as the Feme shall live the remainder to M. M. 4. After the Executrix had agreed the first devisee cannot barre the Executory devise 5. A man may devise an estate which he cannot convey by act executed as to his Executors untill his Debts shall be paid the remainder over they have a Chattell determinable upon payment of the Debts which cannot be at the common Law If a Sheriffe sell a Terme upon a Fieri facias and judgement is reversed the sale shall stand otherwise none will buy any thing upon Execution and judgement was given for the Plaintiffe and affirmed in Error
shall abate against all but if it be for matter in fact onely as for misnaming one Defendant it shall abate onely against him omission or addition which doth not alter the forme is amendable as if Dei gratia be omitted Voluntary or negligent keeping of Records by the Clerke is amendable by other parts of the Record or by exemplification Count or plea in barr c. which wanteth substance shall not be amended in another Terme but default in the colour because this is the default of the Clerke shall be a Record shall be amended in another Terme by the paper Booke and a thing apparent to be the fault of the Clerke shall be amended in another Terme as rien luydoit de hoc c. predictus defend pro quaerent Nisi prius shall be amended by this Statute if power be given to the Justices to proceed otherwise not as if issue joyned in the Record be mistaken in the Nisi prius it shall not be amended but misprision of dammages shall be because this is not materiall to the issue and it is the default of the Clerke Warrant of attorney and returnes are amendable by this Statute but if there be none at all it is out of the Statute and because this Statute leaveth many cases without remedy the Statutes of 32. H. 8. cap. 30. and 18. Eliz. cap. 14. were made Ten misprisions as yet not remedied 1. Variance materiall betweene the originall and the Count. 2. Want of substance in the originall or Count. 3. Insufficient tryalls 4. If a Coroner returnes the Jury where the Sheriffe ought 5. Lack of name of the Sheriffe to the returne 6. Where no returne is indorced upon the Venire facias 7. When one who is not returned giveth a Verdict 8. Pleas of the Crowne 9. If it appeare to the Court that he who hath a Verdict had no cause of action 10. Errour in Law Cases in the Court of Wardes Myghts Case 7. Jacobi fol. 163. 1. REsolved if J. M. purchase Lands to him and an Infant in fee it cannot be averred that this was to take away the wardship because he never was sole Tenant to the King 2. No feoffement that I. M. can make of his moity can be aver'd to be by collusion c. because without feoffement no wardship shall be and also the Statute speakes of sole seisin 3. A feoffement to the wife or younger Child cannot be averred to be by covin c. upon construction of the Statute of 32. 34. H. 8. where collusion cannot be averred by the Statute of Marlebridge it cannot be now to seize all the Land but it may be for the third part which belongs to the King If a third part be left to the King no averrement of covin may be for the other two parts the Father makes a feoffement to diverse uses the remainder to his second Sonne and dyeth his Eldest Sonne dyes the second Sonne shall not be in ward by averment of covin Digbies Case 7. Jacobi fo 165. TEnant of the King conveys his Lands to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to his Sonne and Heire in taile and after is attainted of Treason the King shall have no wardship of any part of the Land by 32. 34. H. 8. because there is no Heire and livery must be sued in the name of the Heire but the King shall have wardship in such a case before 26. H. 8. because there was an Heire The Earle of Cumberlands Case 7. Jacobi fol. 166. E. 2. granted the Castle and Mannor of S. in taile to R. C. H. 6. granted the reversion to T. C. if the taile be good if not he grants it in possession this is good one way or other and so are many Patents from time to time Paris Stoughters Case 7. Jacobi fol. 168. BY Mandamus it was found that P. S. dyed seised 40. El. and held of the Queen in common socage 7. Jacobi a Melius inquirendum was awarded whither he held of the King by common socage or in chivalry and it is found that he held of the Queene by chivalry This Writ of Melius c. is repugnant and giveth no authority to find this office because a Tenure cannot be of the King in the time of Queene Elizabeth and therefore a new Writ shall be awarded but if the first Melius be good no other shall issue 1. For avoiding Infinitnesse 2. A Diem clausit c. shall not issue upon a Diem c. Nor Mandamus upon a Mandamus so a Melius c. shall not issue upon a Melius 3. If an Office be found against a Subject he shall have a traverse and if upon that it be found against him he hath no remedie So the King shall have but one office and a Melius and no more although that a Tenure be found of two Subjects or one hath an Ouster le maine the King shall not reseise without a Scire facias Toursons Case 8. Jacobi fol. 170. IF Tenant of the King commit Fellony Ao 1. Jaco and after is attainted Ao 3. for the same and after in Ao 4. all is found by office Now this office shall have relation to the time of the Fellony to avoid all meane alienations and incumbrencies but for the meane profits it shall have relation to the time of the Attendor for their the Kings Title appeared of Record and the like Law is of an Ideot But in case of a ward within age the King shall have the meane profits from the death of the Auncestor because he hath it by reason of his Seigniory and he looseth the rent and services in the meane time the difference is when the King seiseth jure protectionis regae or Nomine destrictionis and when Ratione Prioris recti seu tituli Sir Gerrard Fleetewoods Case 8. Jacobi fol. 171. SIr William Fleetewood receiver of the Revennues of the Court of Wards in Anno. 35. Eliz. was possessed of a Messuage and certaine Lands in Harrow in Com Mid for a tearme of yeares in Anno. 36. Eliz. he became Receiver generall and was bound in 20. Obligations of 200. l. a peece to make true account c. And after upon severall accounts he became indebted in great Summes of money to the Queene and being so indebted in consideration of 1100. l. did bargaine and sell the said Lease to James Pemberton which by meane conveyance came to Sir Gertard Fleetwood Question Whither this Lease c. was extendable and lyable to the Kings Debt c. and it was resolved that the said sale of the tearme was good against the King because the tearme was but a Chattell and the sale of Chattells after judgement Bona fide is good but not after Execution awarded And Cooke Chiefe Justice said that a Receiver or other accomptant which is indebted shall not be in worse case then a Fellon or a Traytor that may after Fellony or Treason and before conviction sell Bona fide for his
defeasible Title the other shall distraine for the moity of the Seigniory and the Act of the Coparcener shall not prejudice her There are foure manner of Avowries 1. Upon his very Tenant 2. Upon his very Tenant by the manner where the Tenant had but a particular estate 3. Upon his Tenant by the manner when the Lord had but a particular estate 4 Upon the matter in the Land as within his fee but the Lord hath liberty to Avow according to the Common Law Thoroughgoods Case 9. Jacobi fol. 136. TEnant in fee infeoffeth one by Deed indented and delivereth it upon the Land in the name of seisin this is good and hath a double operation at one instant Viz. to deliver the Writing as a Deed and to deliver seisin of the Land according to the Deede 1. Resolved this is his Deed although he doth not say so but delivers it in the name of seisin for delivery is good without any words if one deliver a Deed to one as an escrow to be his Deed upon performance of conditions this is his Deed presently otherwise if he deliver it to a stranger so words are good without actuall delivery as if he saith take it like to a livery within view If the Obligee deliver the Obligation to the Obligor to redeliver the Obligor may retaine it for the words to redeliver are void 2. Delivery of the deede upon the Land amounteth not to livery and seisin but it doth if delivered in the name of seisin so of any other thing or if he saith I deliver you seisin without delivering any thing this is good also Beaumonts Case 10. Jacobi fol. 138. I. B. and E. his Wife Tenants in speciall Taile the remainder to the Heires of the Baron I. B. levies a Fine to K. E. 6. who grants to the Earle of H. in fee I. B. dyeth E. enters the Earle of H. confirmes her estate to have to her and the Heires of the body of I. B. E. dyeth seised having issue F. B. who accepts a fine Sur conusans de droit tantum with Proclamations and dyes having issue Sir H. and I. Sir H. in Ward to the K. after full age and before livery Covenanteth to stand seised to the use of himselfe and his heires Males of his body and dyes having issue onely a Daughter in Ward whether shee or I. B. shall have the Land c. 1. Resolved that E. had an estate taile and the Statute of 4. H. 7. c. 24. which inableth the Baron to barre the issue saveth the right of the Feme if shee enter or c. and one may have an estate taile which cannot discend as if the Sonne in the life of the Father levyeth a fine the Father remaineth Tenant in taile still although it cannot discend and E. here hath an estate taile so long as shee liveth or the Heires in taile remaine 2. The Confirmation is void for he who did confirme had but a possibility which passeth not by the confirmation and if he had a reversion in fee yet it should be void 1. Because the taile which the Feme had was confirmed which cannot descend 2. The confirmation doth not add a descendible quallity where he who should have it is disabled to receive by discent 3. This would in effect repeale 4. H. 7. 32. H. 8. two of the principall Pillars of the Law 4. 5. If Tenant in Dower grants her estate there is a discendible quality in the Heire to bring wast against Tenant in Dower and although the Heire confirme her estate for life and after shee assigneth it to I. S. who committeth wast yet the action of wast is maintainable against her Pari ratione in the Case at Barre in regard the confirmation doth not inlarge the estate of E. it cannot add unto it a discendible quallity 6. There are but three manner of Confirmations Viz. Perficiens Crescens aut diminuens and the Confirmation in this Case is none of them and if E. had no power to levy a fine or suffer recovery the reason is because she cannot barre that which was barred before by her Husband but this point was not now in Question The End of the Ninth Booke THE TENTH BOOK The Case of Suttons Hospitall Baxter Plaintiffe Sutton and Law Defendants in Trespasse in the Kings Bench and adjourned into the Exchequer Chamber and judgemet given against the Plaintiffe 1. Obj. BY the Parliament 7. Jacobi the Hospitall was Founded at H. in Essex Ergo the incorporation made after by the Kings Letters Patents is void and the Charterhouse is not given by the said Statute because S. purchased it after 2. Sutton who had License to Found an Hospitall before the Foundation dyed 3. The K. cannot name the House and Lands of S. to be an Hospitall because in Alieno solo 4. Every Corporation ought to have a place certaine but here the License is to found an Hospitall at or in the Charterhouse Ergo before that S. had made it certaine there was no incorporation also the place of Corporation ought to be certaine by Meates and Bounds and a place knowne will not serve 5. The King intended to make an incorporation presently which cannot be before that S. name a Master 6. Governors cannot be untill there be poore in the Hospitall Ergo S. calleth it in his Will his intended Hospitall 7. The Foundation cannot be without the words Fundo erigo c. and before such Foundation a Stranger cannot give Lands unto it 8. The Master was named at will where he ought to be for life and have freehold in the Lands also the Hospitall must be Founded before a Master be named 9. The bargaine and sale made by S. is void 1. Because the Money paid by the Governours in their private capacity shall not inure to them in their politick capacity 2. The Habendum is to them upon trust which cannot be in a Corporation 3. Because as before no Hospitall was Founded 10. The King cannot make Governours of a thing not in Esse To the first it was answered that the Letters Patents recite the preamble of the Act whereby and in many parts of the Act it appeareth that the incorporation was to be In futuro when it shall be erected and the Statute doth not give any Lands unto it but power to give without License of alienation and mortmaine and it appeareth by the Letters Patents that the erection precedes the License 2. The License is to him his Heires Executors c. at any time hereafter and the words of incorporation are in the present and so the incorporation precedeth the execution of this License 3. Although the King gave the name yet S. devised it and assented to it and the K. did it at his Suite 4. The K. makes an Hospitall of all the premises so that it is certaine and as to that which was said that a place uncertaine cannot be an Hospitall It was answered that a Mannor may be which is
such a possibility as may be released ought to be Propinqua and not Remota and it is more then a common possibility that an Executor will dye before 5000. yeares and the person who releaseth it ought to have it in certeine therefore if a remainder be limitted to the right Heires of I. S. his Eldest Sonne cannot release it because he is not certeine whither he shall be Heire at the death of his Father so if a Lease be made to Baron and Feme the remainder to the survivor of them for 21. yeares the Baron cannot grant this Tearme 4. This by her death goeth to her Executors therefore it may be extinguished by her if the disseissee release all actions to the disseissor who dyes the disseissee shall have a Writ of entry against his Heire or if Bailor release all Actions to the Bailee he shall have adetinue against his Executors 5. It is a present Legacy although the interest be In futuro and therefore the Legacy may be discharged and consequently the interest it selfe For Qui destruit medium destruit finem and this may be before assent of the Executor 6. Otherwise there would be a perpetuity of Chattells 2. By this release the Executor had a perfect estate for 5000. yeares absolutely 3. The request and acceptance of the release by the Executor amounteth to an agreement The Case of the Chancellour Masters and Schollers of the Vniversity of Oxford 11. Jacobi fol. 53. THe Statute of 3. Jacobi giveth presentments of Churches which belong to Recusants convicted to the Chancellour and Schollers of O. and makes grants of such Recusants void One indicted of recusancy grants a prochein avoidance and is after convicted the Church becommeth voyd the Chancellour Masters and Schollers bring a Quare impedit and averr that he remained a Recusant 1. Resol The grant of the next avoydance betwixt the Indictment and conviction is void for the Statute is that a Recusant convicted shall be disabled c. from the time of the Session of the Parliament so a grant of the next avoidance by an Abbot before surrender and after the Statute of 31 H. 8. cap. 13. of Monasteries is void so if an Officer of the King purchase Land and alien it and become indebted to the King this Land is lyable to the debt 2. Covine shall not be presumed if it be not averred and if the Jury finde that Covine was to one intent that shall not be taken to another intent therefore because it is not sayd that this grant was by Covine it shall not be intended 3. Although the Statute giveth the avoydances to the Chancellour and Schollers of O. yet they may bring a Quare impedit in the name of their Corporation and the misnaming of the Corporation doth not avoyd the act when it appeareth what Corporation is intended 2. It was pleaded that the Statute giveth it to the Chancellour Master and Schollers and the Defendant had demurred upon it 3. This being a private act it shall be taken as it is pleaded 4. The University must shew that the Grantor was a Recusant convicted at the time of the avoydance but not that he continued so because it is a Chattell vested in them which shall not be devested by his conformity after Judgement for the Plaintiffs The Bishop of Salisburies Case 11. Jacobi fol. 58. THe Defendant in a second deliverance pleads a grant of the Bishop of S. to E. G. and himselfe of the office of Surveiorship of his Mannors with a rent charge of twenty Nobles per annum with confirmation of the Deane and Chapter and that it is Antiquum officium used to be granted in such manner to such person and persons as the Bishop and his Predecessors shall please The Plaintiffe pleads the Statute of 1. Eliz. and that the sayd Office hath not beene used to be granted but for the life of one whereby the grant is voyd Et hoc paratus est verificare It was excepted to the Barr that the avowant had pleaded that the Bishop and his Predecessors have used to grant the said Office to such person or persons c. And the Plaintiffe pleads in barr that it had not been used to be granted but for one life and concludeth hoc paratus est c. where it ought to have been quod inquiratur per c. yet it is good because the avowry is in the disjunctive 2. It is not averred that the Bishop is dead and if he be not the grant is good during his life it is good for it appeareth by the words nuper Episcopum that he was dead or removed exceptions to the avowry that to say this is an ancient Office is too generall because hee made title to the Office it selfe but it had been good if he had claimed another thing by reason of the Office and the exception holden good It was objected that this grant was out of the Statute of 1. Eliz. because no parcell of the possessions of the Bishoprick as the Statute speaketh 2. Such things are restrained by the Statute whereof a rent may be reserved 3. If it had been an Office parcell of the Bishoprick which the Bishop might exercise this had been within the Statute but this is not so 4. If it be restrained for two lives then also for one life But it was Resolved that the sayd grant for two lives was voyd against the successor by the Statute of 1. Eliz. 1. Resol This grant had been good at the Common Law by confirmation of the Deane and Chapter 2. The Act of 32. H. 8. cap. 28. inableth the Bishop to make a Lease for 21. yeares or three lives observing the limitations of the Statute without the Deane and Chapter 3. The Statute of 1. Eliz. restraineth the Bishop to grant any parcell of his possessions or any thing belonging to his Bishoprick but for 21. yeares or three lives c. but against the Bishop himselfe it is good and this Office may be sayd belonging to his Bishoprick because he had an inheritance in the disposition of it and the intent of the Statute was to avoyd diminutions and dilapidations therefore a grant of such an ancient Office of service and necessity for one life as was accustomed is out of the Statute but more then that he cannot doe because it is not of necessity and the death of one of them in the life of the Bishop is not to the purpose for the grant was voyd against the successor and it shall not be made good by accident after 4. Such a grant for one life without confirmation of the Deane and Chapter is voyd because it is out of the Statute of 1. Eliz. and resolved also that although the Bishoprick be new yet a grant of a necessary Office with a reasonable Fee of which the Court shall judge bindeth the successor Nota Where there was a clause in 1. Eliz. that Bishops may grant to the Queene c. 1. Jacobi by Parliament restraineth
c. the remainder to D. c the remainder to the right Heires of himselfe Sir Richard Chudley died without issue of the body of G. 1º of the Queene the feoffees C. living by deed infeoffed A. in fee without consideration he having notice of the first uses A. hath issue a Sonne named S. and after I. and after infeoffes Sir I. C. with warranty S. died without issue c. I. enters c. agreed by all the Justices and Barons but two that the feoffement made by the feoffees which had an Estate for life devests all the estates and the future contingent uses also and though A. had notice of the first use 't is not materiall because the ancient uses were devested and this new estate cannot be Subject to the ancient uses which rose out of the ancient estate agreed that 27 H. 8. doth not extend to destroy uses otherwise then by execution and transferring the possession to them agreed by the most that 27. H. 8. doth not transferre the possession to any use but onely to uses In esse which doth appeare by the Statute for there ought to be a person In esse seised and also a use In esse for if there be onely a possibility of a use there cannot be an execution of the possession to the use the Statute sayes That the estate shall be out of the feoffees and that the estate shall be in such person which hath the use So that no Estate of the feoffees shall be transferred in abeyance and upon this t was concluded that contingent uses or in possibility may be destroyed or discontinued before that they come In esse as they might at common Law so the remainders limitted in use here shall follow the rule and reason of Estates executed in possession by the common law and if the estate for life here had beene determined by death before the birth of the Sonne the remainder in future should be voide though the Sonne were borne after for a remainder ought to vest during the particular estate or Eo instanti when it ends And t was holden by all that if the contingent use here had come In esse without alteration of the estate of the Land it should be executed by the Statute of 27. H. 8. Also it was holden by most that 27. H. 8. against the expresse Letter of it shall not be taken by equity because by preservation of contingent uses mischeives intended to be prevented shall be preserved and greater introduced Popham chiefe Justice said that by 27. H. 8. some uses in esse are executed presently uses in futuro agreeable to Law are executed if they come In esse in due time but uses not agreeable to Law are extirpated for the intention of the Statute was to restore the ancient common Law Five other points adjudged besides the principall matter 1. When Tenant for life the remainder being in taile to A. infeoffes the reversioner t is a forfeiture for it devests the estate in remainder so if there be Tenant in taile the remainder in taile ctc. and the diversity is when the privity and estate is sole and immediate when not 2. If A. hath issue B. and C. infants and a lease is made to A. for life the remainder to B. in taile the remainder to C. in taile A is diseised and releases to the disseisor with warranty and dyes this discends upon B. within age B. dyes the warranty discends upon C. within age C. comes to full age and three yeares after enters his entry is lawfull for he might enter in the life of his Ancestor and if he doth not enter yet the warranty shall not binde him otherwise it is when he is put to action and Caveat that after his full age he doth not suffer a discent before entry 3. If a disseisor c. who hath a defeasible title in a Mannor grant a voluntary estate by Coppy being forfeited or escheated to him this grant shall not binde him that hath right after a recontinuance of the Mannor but admittances which a disseisor c. makes to Coppy holds are good for they are in a manner judiciall acts and shall binde the disseisee 4. That an estate made to one and his Heires during the life of B. is but an Estate for life upon which a remainder may depend 5. That an Estate made to A. and his Heires of the body of Jane S. is an Estate taile against the opinion of Ascugh 20. H. 6. 36. Anne Maiowes Case 35. Eliz. fo 146. FEeoffor and Feoffee upon condition by Deed joyne in a grant of a rent charge to C. the condition is broken the Feeoffor reenters the grantee distraines the Feoffor brings a Replevin Resolved that the rent remaines to the objection that 't is the grant of the Feoffee and the confirmation onely of the Feoffor and a confirmation cannot make a conditionall estate absolute nor alter the quality of it except it inlarge it as if a Feoffor confirme the estate of the Feoffee upon condition before the condition broken it doth not make it absolute Answered and agreed by the Court that there is a diversity when the estate of him to whom the confirmation is made is upon an expresse condition there the confirmation doth not toll the condition but if such feoffee infeoffe another without condition there a confirmation to the second feoffee extincts the condition Feoffee upon condition grants a rent in fee the feoffor confirmes it to him and his heires and after enters for condition broken yet the rent remaines and by Littleton every fee simple land may be charged one way or other Concurrentibus his c. and the case 11. H. 7. is all one with our case and here 't is the stronger because the grant and confirmation were by the same Deed so that the rent was never subject to any condition The Rector of Chedingtons case 40. Eliz. fo 153. 2. E. 6. the Rector of Ched demised the Rectory to El Elderker for fourescore yeares if she should live so long and if she dyed within the said terme or aliened that then her estate should cease and then by the same Indenture demises the premises to R. E. for so many yeares as shall remaine unexpired after the death or alienation of El. for the residue of the terme of fourescore yeares if he shall live so long without alienation c. And if he dye or alien within the said terme then his estate shall cease and then by the same Indenture he grants the premisses to W. for so many yeares of the said terme of fourescore yeares as remaine if he lives without alienation and if W. dyes or aliens within the said terme that his estate shall cease and then he grants c. during so many of the fourescore yeares which shall be unexpired to T. his executors and assignes which Indenture and estate was confirmed by the Patron and Ordinary the Rector dyes T. dyes W. dyes and 17. Eliz. Ellerker