solemne calling to be the Sons of God And this part of redemption is common to all who are baptized according to Christs commission given to his Apostles and their Successors to this purpose Another part of our Redemption whether that be altogether distinct from the former or but a consequent to it is our actuall exemption from the rage or tyranny of sinne within our selves whilst we live here in the flesh And this degree of redemption is proper only to those who though they live in the flesh doe not live according to the flesh or the fashions of the world as having their hearts purified by a lively faith in Christs death The last part or finall accomplishment of our Redemption is the exemption of both body and soule from the powers of hell and death by Resurrection unto endlesse glory which is the everlasting salvation here meant And this is proper only unto such as finally shall be sayed by continuance in faith and obedience But let us not deceive our selves for God will not be mocked and wee shall but mock him if we presume to goe to heaven by curious Distinctions or nice Doctrines without a constant progresse in syncere unpartiall obedience Nor will externall conformitie to orthodox all rites or Religion or eye-service suffice to obtaine the salvation here promised to such as obey him or if we be addicted to eye-service or obedience let us performe our obedience not in our own eyes or as in the eyes of sinfull men but as in the eyes and view of that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mentioned by our Apostle Chap. 4. of this Epistle ver the 9. In whose sight every Creature is manifest all things are open and naked This is that eternall word who is now made our high Priest and shall hereafter come to be our Iudge Let us then account it a principall part of our present and future obedience to powre out our soules in prayers and supplications to this our high Priest for the remission of all our sinnes past and seeing hee was consecrated once for all through afflictions or sufferings for so the current of our Apostles discourse implyes to be a compassionate and mercifull high Priest to his Father for us let us all publiquely and privately dayly and houâ—ely beseech him by his agony and bloody sweat by his Orâ—sse and bitter passion not only to make intercession for us but to powre out the spirit of prayer upon us â—o strengthen us with supplies of grace for â—ubduing the body of sinne which is within us unto the spirit and to quicken our spiâ—ies unto newnesse of life that so we may be able to stand before him in that great day of Iudgment SECT 2. Of the calling or designement of the Sonne of God to be an high Priest after the order of Melchisedech Of the differences and agreements in some particulars betweene the Preisthood of Aaron and the Priesthood of Melchisedech CHAP. 6. Of the Signification or Importance of the word calling used by our Apostle Heb. 5. with the generall Heads or Points to be handled and discust in this 2. 3. 4. Sections THat the making of the Sonne of God perfect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 v. 9. implyes a solemne Calling or Consecration to his high Priesthood is yet more apparant from the words following v. 10. Calledan high Priest after the order of Melchisedech This word Called imports somewhat more then a name imposed upon him though at his Circumcision or at his Baptisme more then a mere title of dignitie But what more then so A solemne Calling or Designement unto this high Office or Prelacy Such a calling but more solemne then Aaron had unto the legall high Priesthood Vnto this Priesthood Aaron is said Chap. 5. v. 4. that hee was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is by speciall Designement or destination advanced to the office of the high Driest during the Law But when the same Apostle speakes of the calling of the Sonne of God unto the high Priesthood after the order of Melchisedech v. 10. The word in the original is more significant and more solemne then 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it referres to Aaron for it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 solemnly declared or pronounced by God to be an high Priest after the order of Mechisedech 2 The method of our present inquiry or search into this grand mysterie must be this First who this Melchisedech was according to whose order the Sonne of God was called to be a Priest or how Melchisedech whosoever he were did represent or shadow out the person of the Sonne of God Secondly wherein the Priesthood of Melchisedech did consist or wherein it differred from the Priesthood of Aaron and what calling hee had to such a Priesthood Thirdly what divine Designement or calling the Sonne of God had to his everlasting Priesthood Fourthly a parallel betweene the Consecration of Aaron or other of his Successors to this legall Priesthood and the Consecration of the Sonne of God to his everlasting Priesthood prefigured or foreshadowed not by Aaron or his Successors but by Melchisedech before the Law was given Fiftly the peculiar acts or exercises of the Sonne of God's everlasting Priesthood This fift or last Point must be referred as an appendix unto the Articles of the Sonne of God's Ascension and his sitting at the right hand of God the Father All these are Points of good use and worthy of deeper and better consideration then they usually are taken into by most Interpreters of sacred Writ or Controversywriters The first Question only may seeme to be too curious And so perhaps it is indeed if wee should take upon us to determine the individualitie of Melchisedech's person after whose order the Sonne of God was consecrated or made a Priest But on the other side it would be presumptuous absolutly to deny this Melchisedech to have been the same individuall person whom the later Iewes generally and many late learned Christian writers take him for The greatest difficulty in this Point ariseth from the Apostles description of Melchisedech Chap. 7. v. 3. Without father without mother without descent having neither beginning of dayes nor end of life but made like unto the Sonne of God abideth a Priest continually 3 From this place some would peremptorily conclude that Melchisedech could be no mortal man no sonne of Adam but either the holy Ghost or the sonne of God then appearing to Abraham in the similitude or likenesse of man For of this Melchisedech save only in the history of Abraham Gen. 14. and 110. Psalme there is no mention at all in the old Testament To wave or rather dismisse their opinion who think Melchisedech was the holy Ghost the third person in Trinitie seeing it is but a conjecture of some few who rather wave then prosecute it Let us see what probabilitie there is that this Melchisedech should be the eternal Word or Son of God appearing to Abraham in the likenesse of man and exercising
Apostle Hebr. 7. 26. 27. For such an high Priest became us who is holy harmelesse undefiled seperate from sinners and made higher then the heavens who needeth not dayly as those high Priests to offer up sacrifice first for his owne sinnes and then for the peoples For this hee did once when hee offered up himselfe 2 So farre was our high Priest from standing in need of any sinne-offring or sacrifice for himselfe that hee himselfe became the full and perfect attonement for the sinnes of the whole world even the sinne-offring for the high Priests themselves which yearly made attonement for the people Againe 't was a defect or imperfection in the sacrifices by which Aaron was consecrated in that they were more then one or of diverse kinds for of bloody sacrifices there were three a bullock for a sinne-offring and two Rammes the one for a fire-offring or sacrifice of rest the other the Ramme of Consecration or of filling the hand It argues againe a greater defect in all these sacrifices whether you take them coniunctim or divisim in that they were to be often offered And this defect or imperfection in the substance of these sacrifices or in the sacrificer or his service the Lord sought to recompence or supply by the perfection of the number of severall times or solemnities in which they were offered For these sacrifices were to be offered seven times Aaron and his sonnes were to fill their hands seven dayes together before their Consecration was accomplished Our high Priest as he had no sacrifice but one to wit the sacrifice of himselfe so was he to offer this sacrifice or this sacrifice was to be offered but once either for his owne or for our Consecration And by this once offring of this one sacrifice hee did fully and absolutely accomplish whatsoever was fore-shadowed by the full number of the legall sacrifices or solemnities which were used at the Consecration of Aaron For the number of seven is a full number yea a number full of mysteries and wherein the Spirit of God seemes to delight Herein then as hath been intimated before the high Priest of the New Testament and the high Priest of the Old exactly agree that as the Consecration of the one so the Consecration of the other was to last seven dayes Aaron and his sonnes as you may read Exod. 29. were commanded to attend at the doore of the tabernacle seven dayes together Our Saviour after his entrance into Ierusalem did attend the Temple five dayes together teaching and instructing the people and in curing the blind and lame which were brought unto him Hee was more frequent and diligent in performing those and the like acts of mercy then Aaron and his sonnes were in offering sacrifices or performing other legall services And having purged the materiall Temple from brothery and merchandizing restoring it to the use of prayer which the high Priests of the Law had turned or suffered to be turned into a denne of theeves having thus purged the Temple on the first or second day of his Consecration and afterwards hallowed it by his Doctrine by his presence and exercise of holinesse in it hee went the sixth day into his heavenly Sanctuary into Paradise it selfe to purifie and sanctifie it with his owne blood to consecrate it for us as Moses at Aaron's Consecration did purifie and consecrate the materiall Sanctuary and the Altar with the blood of Bullocks and of Rammes Yet was not this Consecration as yet fully accomplished the period or accomplishing of it is from the moment of his Resurrection or Reunition of his soule and body As Aaron first so every high Priest of the Law after him was to continue seven dayes in his Consecration that the seventh day or Sabbath might passe over him because no man as they conceive can be a compleat Priest untill a Sabbath have gone over his head But the Sabbath of the Lord did never so exactly passe over any high Priest in his Consecratton as it did over the high Priest of the New Testament However it were of Aaron's it was the last day of his Consecration it was to him indeed a Day of rest after six dayes of labour of watching praying fasting and after hee had accomplished the workes which his Father had sent him to doe◠by the torments of his bloody sactifice and whatsoever paines he suffered upon the Crosse But after he had said consūmatum est which was in the end of the sixth day in that day whereon God first had made man and the Son of God had now redeemed man his Consecration was not yet consummate his body was to rest the Seventh day in the grave And his soule in blisse all the Sabbath or Seventh day and after the heavenly Sanctuary had been thus hallowed by the rest and presence of his blessed soule in it on the Seventh day his soule and body were reunited upon the first day in the morning at that time when the light begū to be distinguished from darknesse And this was the time of the accomplishment of his Consecration or of his admission to the Priesthood after the order of Melchisedech 3 So then to be seven dayes in Consecration was no imperfection in Aaron and his Priesthood but rather a mystery to be accomplished in the Consecration of the Sonne of God That Aaron should have his hands filled seven dayes together by Moses with the sacrifices which were offered for him was an argument as well of his owne personall imperfections as of the imperfections of his sacrifices Howbe it the mystery or morall implyed by the filling of the hand was no point of imperfection and for this reason was as exactly fulfilled in the Consecration of ou◠high Priest as in the Consecration of Aaron The morall implied by the filling of the hand was to signifie that Aaron did not usurp the dignity of Priesthood or take it up as we say at his owne hand but was hereunto lawfully and solemnly called by God from whom hee had received whatsoever he had The inference hence made by our Apostle is this Heb. 5. 4. 5. No man taketh this honour to himselfe but he that is called of God as was Aaron So also Christ glorified not himselfe to be made an high Priest but he that said unto him Thou art my Sonne to day have I begotten thee Hee that had thus said unto him did likewise prepare or fit a body to him for his sacrifice hee did not fill his hand with sacrifices or burnt offrings 4. It was an imperfection likewise in Aaron's person or his sacrifices or in both his Consecration it selfe was imperfect in that his Consecration did not serve for the Consecration of his sonnes or his Successors all of them were to have their severall sacrifices or other solemne rites of Consecration The perfection which this foil sets forth in our high Priest and his Consecration is this that we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Iesus
compâ—â—aâ— high Priest after the O 〈…〉 of Melâ—â—iâ—â— dâ—câ— Pag. 18. 5. That the Soâ—ne of God by his Consecration being â—ncâ— accomplished become the Authorâ— and Fountain of everlasting â—aâ—vâ—tion to all such and only such as obey him In what sâ—nce he is said to have dyed for 〈…〉 â—â—â—â— be 〈…〉 of all mankind Pag. 23. SECTION 2. OF the calling of designement of the Sonne of God to be an high Priest after the order of Melchisedech of the differences and agreements in some particulars betweene the Priesthood of Aâ—on and the Priesthood of Melchisedech CHAP. 6. Of the signification or importance of the word calling used by our Apostle Heb. 5. with the generall Heads or Points to be handled and discust in this 2. 3. 4. Sections Pag. 29. 7. In what sense Melchisedech is said to be without Father and Mother Heb. 7. 3. Whether he were a mortall man aâ— Abraham was though more auncient wherein the similitude betweene Melchisedech's person and the person of the Sonne of God doth specially consist Pag. 32. 8. That the omission of Melchisedech's â—â—â—â—â—logy did import a speciall mystery and what that mystery was pag. 40. 9 What manner of blessing it was which Melchisedech â—â—stowed on Abraham That the manner of the blessing argues Melchisedech to have beene Sem the great as the Iewish Rabbins enstile him the eldest sonne of Noah not by birth yet by prerogative of the first borne pag. 44. 10. Wherein the priesthood of Melchisedech did differ from the priesthood of Aaron That Melchisedech did not offer any sacrifice of bread and wine unto God when he blessed Abraham pag. 50. 11. In respect of what points especially the priesthood of Melchisedech did fore-picture the priesthood of the Sonne of God pag. 56. SECTION 3. OF the calling or destination of the Seede of Abraham and Sonne of David by solemne oath to the everlasting Priesthood CHAP. 12. The chiefe or main principle whereon our Apostle grounds his Treatise or discourse to the Hebrewes Containing a Paraphrase upon the most part of the sixt Chapter to the Hebrewes pag. 67. 13 The use of oaths and their observance is from the Law of Nature Of the manner of taking solemne oathes amongst the Ancients of severall Nations pag. 74. 14. Of Oaths promissory specially for Confirmation of leagues and of the fearefull judgements that usually fall upon them who wittingly and willingly violate them pag. 80. 15. In what cases solemne oaths were or are to be taken and administred pag. 90. 16. Gods oath to Abraham was an oath for Confirmation of the league betwixt them Of the severall manner of leagues pag. 96. 17. The League betweene God and Abraham did eminently containe the most accurate solemnities that were used betwixt Prince and Prince or Nation and Nation pag. 104. 18. What the Interposition of God's oath for more a bundant Confirmation of his promise to Abraham did import over and above all that which was included in the literall or assertive sense of the League betwixt God and Abraham pag. 113. 19. Of the two things wherein our Apostle saith it was impossible for God to lye pag. 122. 20. The former Importance of Gods Oath to Abraham and the contents of it specified in the two immediately precedent Chapters morefully confirmed by the â—enour of Gods oath to David and to his seed described at large by the Author of the 98 Psalm most concludently by the Apostle Heb. 7. pag. 127. SECTION 4. BY what Persons and in what manner the Consecration of Iesus Christ the Sonne of God to his Priesthood was prefigured CHAP. 21. That Iesus or Iehoshua the son of Nun Zerubbabel the sonne of Shealtiel and Iesus the sonne of Iehosadeck were speciall Tipes of Iesus Christ the Sonne of God respectively as he was to be made and now is both King and Priest pag. 145. 22. Of the harmony betweene the Prophet Ieremy and the Prophet Zachary concerning the man whose name is the Branch How his growth or springing up was prefigured by Zerubbabel the sonne of David His name and title as our high Priest fore-pictured by the name and title of Iesus the sonne of Iosedech That he was as truly the Sonne of God before all time as the sonne of David in time pag. 154. 23. The objection of the Iewes against the interpretation of the former Prophecy Ierem. 23. answered In what sense Iudah is truly said to be saved and Israel to dwell in safety by Iesus the Sonne of God and sonne of David pag. 163. 24. That our high Priest the Sonne of God did not only accomplish that which was fore-shadowed by the name and title and office of Iesus the Sonne of Iosedeck but withall the legall rites or solemnities none of which he did destroy or dissolve as he did the works of the Divell but change or advance them into better solemnities to be observed by us Christians That his solemne accomplishment of the feast of Attonement at the feast of the Passover was prefigured in the Law and fore-signified by Gods speciall command pag. 167. 25. In what respects the Consecration of Aaron and of his sonnes did especially prefigure the Consecration of the Sonne of God and in what respect's they specially differ That the Consecration of Aaron did in diverse respects serve as a foile to set forth the excellency of the Consecration of the Sonne of God pag. 182. 26. In what respects the Bullock offered at the Consecration of Aaron c. and the rites of offering it did prefigure the bloody sacrifice of the Sonne of God especially the circumstances of the place wherein it was offered pag. 190. 27. In what respects the Ramme of the Consecration and the Ramme which God did provide for a burnt offering instead of Isaack did prefigure the sacrifice of the Sonne of God Of other speciall rites wherein Aaron at his Consecration and in the function of his Priest-hood did prefigure the Consecration and Priesthood of the Sonne of God pag. 196. 28. A briefe recapitulation of what hath beene said in this parallel betweene the Consecration of Aaron and the Consecration of the Sonne of God the conclusion of the whole Treatise concerning it pag. 208. SECTION 5. OF the Resurrection of the Sonne of God By what Prophets it was fore-told By what persons or legall Rites it was fore-pictured or foreshadowed CHAP. 29. In what high esteeme S. Paul did hold the Article of of our Saviours Resurrection and Ascension c. That the want of explicite beliefe to this grand Article of the Resurrection did argue rather a dulnesse or slownesse to believe the Scrip tures then any infidelity or incredulity even in such as had seene his miracles and had heard him fore-tell his death and rising againe untill the event did manifest unto them the truth of his former Doctrine and predictions pag. 214. 30. That the Death and Resurrection of the Sonne of God was enigmatically fore-told in the first promise made to our Father Adam and
which word for word is neither more nor lesse then to be made perfect 2 But many words there are in all the learned tongues whose prime signification every ordinary Grammar Scholar may know whil'st hee reades them onely in Historians or Rhetoricians And yet the best Grammarian living so he be no more then a GraÌ„marian may be altogether ignorant of their true meaning oâ— importance whilest they are used in legall or solemne Instruments or as termes of some speciall art or faculty Every schooleboy knowes the ordinary signification of Possum whilest he reads it in his Grammar rules or in such Authors as he is acquainted with and yet his master how good a Grammarian soever unlesse hee bee a Philosopher withall shall hardly be able to render the true notion or expression of Potentia in naturall Philosophy And a naturall Philosopher may bee sometimes as sarre to seeke in the use of the same word Potentia or Potestas in the faculty of the Civill Law Lastly he that hath his senses exercised in all these Faculties or Sciences mentioned would be a meer stranger to the notion of the same word in the Mathematicks as unable to expresse what Posse or Aequiposse imports in the Science of Geometry as a meer rustick is to understand the terms of Law Such a word or terme is this first word in my text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For it is more then a word of art verbum Jolenne used by the LXX Interpreters to expresse the legall and formall consecration of Aaron his sonnes and their successors to their Priestly function And in this sense it is to be taken in this place and is so rendred in our former English And being consecrated he was made the Author of salvation And so is the very same word rendred by our later English Heb. 7. and the last The word of the oath which was since the law maketh the Son Priest who is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 consecrated for evermore The Authours of both Translations if so it had pleased them might have given better content and satisfaction to their readers if they had constantly so expressed the same word with it's allies in most places of this Epistle That in this place the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 imports as much as we have said that is the formall and solemne consecration of the Son of God unto his everlasting Priesthood needes no farther proofe or declaration then the matter or subject of his discourse from the 14 th v. of the 4 th Chap. unto the 11. v. of this 5. Now the onely subject of his discourse aswell in these places now cited as through the whole 7. Chap. is the Consecration of the Sonne of God to his everlasting Priesthood and the super-excellency of the Priesthood aswell as of the CoÌ„secration to it in respect of legall Priesthoods or consecrations 3. This is the profoundest mystery in Divinity or rather the main foundation of all Evangelicall mysteries treated off by our Apostle unto the end of this Epistle But this profound mystery it selfe hath the same hap which other deepe foundations have that is to be least seen or sought into by such as are otherwise exact surveyors of superstructures or buildings raised above ground The summe of my present search or survey after this great mistery is this How the everlasting Priesthood of the Sonne of God and his consecration to it were prefigured foreshadowed or foretold either in the law or before the law Of the eternity of this our high Priests person that is the person of the Sonne of God Melchizedech long before the law was the most illustrious type or picture So was his order or Sacerdotall function the most exact shadow of the Sonne of Gods everlasting Priesthood Of the qualification of the Sonne of God for this everlasting Priesthood and of the manner of his Consecration to it Aaron and other legall Priests his lawfull Successors and the legall rites or manner of their Consecration were the most lively pictures First of the parallel betweene Aaron and his Successors lawfully ordained and the high Priest of our soules for their qualifications required by the Law of God and by the Law of nature Secondly of the parallel betweene Melchisedech and the Sonne of God aswell for their persons as for sacerdotall functions or exercises of them The parallel betweene Aaron and other Priests of the Law and the Sonne of God for their qualification to their different Priesthoods is as was but now intimated the subject of our Apostles discourse from the beginning of the fifth Chapter unto the tenth verse Wee are then in the first place to search out the true sense and meaning of our Apostle by tracing his steps from the first verse unto the ninth verse Secondly to shew in what sense the Son of God by his Consecration became the Author of everlasting salvation to all that obey him and to them only For so our Apostle saith being consecrated he became the Author or cause 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of everlasting salvation to all that obey him CHAP. 2. Of the Separation of the high Priest from men and of the compassionate temper which was the speciall Qualification of every high Priest Heb 5. v. 2. EVery high Priest is taken from among men so that every high Priest must be a man so separate or set apart from ordinary men for offering gifts or sacrifices unto God as that which wee call consecrated or hallowed ground is from common soile or places of secular use or commerce But albeit the Priests of the Law were by Consecration separated from ordinary men yet could they not be separated from their owne sinnes so long as they carried this body of death about them But such an high Priest saith our Apostle Chap. 7. v. 27. it behoved us to have as is harmelesse holy and separated from sinners Hee was so separated from sinners that hee could take no infection from them or their sinnes whilst hee lived and conversed amongst them Another special Qualification required in such as were appointed to the legall Priesthood we have verse the second of this fiâ—ft Chapter And that was to be able sufficiently to have compassion on them that were ignorant and out of the way and for this reason though God be not the Author of sinne in any yet he made an especiall use of the sinnes whereunto legall Priests were subject to teach them thereby to be compassionate towards others more compassionate then they would or could have beene if they had not beene conscious of their owne infirmites and grievous offences against God for which they were to offer sacrifices aswell as for the sinnes of the people And the more deepely they were touched with the consciousnesse of their owne sinnes or with Gods displeasure which they had incurred by them the more devoutly they prayed for the people the more diligent and carefull they were in their office of Attonement for them Every godly or considerate high Priest
7. were heard to the full For so it is said He was heard in that which he feared So both our English translations read it The later with this variation in the margine Hee was heard for his pietie Neither expression is altogether untrueâ— yet neither of them full or both put together not much ad apposituÌ„ litle pertinent to our Apostles intent or meaning How then are they to be amended By a more full explication of the severall acceptions of the words in the originall 3 This latter word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rendred by feare or piety imports in its prime or proper signification as much as a wary or cautelous feare And if good Interpreters doe not faile us it is alway taken in the better sense that is as we say for a filiall or pious not for a base or servile feare Whence seeing he only is pious or godly who is wary or circumspect not to offend God nor to wound his owne conscience the same word in the secondary or consequentiall sense doth signifie piety or godlinesse But whether in one or both of these two compatible senses we take this word in this place the construction which either the vulgar Latine or our English makes of the whole originall clause 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 exanditus est ob reverentiam hee was heard in that he feared or for his piety or reverence will be very harsh For the Greeke proposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cannot by analogy either to the Greeke or Hebrew be rendred by the Latine ob or propter or as our English doth in or for or in that he feared or for his pietie or reverent feare We are therefore to consider a twofold Hebraisme in this passage The one in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the other in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is a generall rule in the Hebrew Dialect that not only Participles but Noune Substanstives or abstract formes are aswell passive as active According to this analogy unto the Hebrew the word Hope aswell in the Greek as in the Latine and many other like are sometimes to be construed actively sometimes passively Spes quâ speramus spes quae speratur And so likewise promissio qua Deus promittit promissio quae promittitur This is the promise which he hath promised even eternall life And so is the word feare whether wee take it in the worse or better sense as for a naturall or servile fear or for a pious and religious fear there is timor quo timemus a feare by which we seeke to eschew evill and timor qui timetur which is no other then the evill feared Now the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must in this place of necessitie be taken in the passive signification not in the active that is for the evil which our Saviour so much or so piously feared Againe in asmuch as God alwaies delivered them from danger or dread whose prayers he heares hence it is that to be exauditus truly heard of God in prayers and supplications is as much as to be delivered from the dread or danger which we pray against So that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is in true English all one as if he had said And he was delivered from that which he so piously or mightily feared 4 The Apostles words containe a full expression of the Psalmists speech or rather a record of the fulfilling of his prophecy Psalm 22. 21. Save me from the Lyons mouth for thou hast heard that is thou hast delivered me from the hornes of the Vnicorne God had delivered his Sonne whose part in all his sufferings this Psalmist did respectively act or represent from the first temptation in the wildernesse and now he prayes he would deliver him from this farre greater temptation in the Garden when the whole hoast of darknesse had inviron'd him with strong cryes and teares Father if it be ' possible let this Cup passe from me And so S. Luke instructs us He was heard and delivered from that houre of temptation which hee did so much dread For in the second pang of that bitter agony an Angell was sent to comfort him and within the space of an ordinary houre this Cup which was ten thousand times more bitter then the death of the Crosse or any paines which he suffered upon it was â—ttely removed from him And after this houre was ended wee doe not read nor is there any circumstance in holy writ to enduce so much as a conjecture that he stood in fear of any evill that could befall him by the Iewes or Roman Souldiers but most patiently as our Apostle speaks endured the Crosse and despised the shame Of what kind soever the paines which hee suffered in the Garden were a point in the former Book discussed at large the suffering of them was neither necessary or requisite for making satisfaction to God the Father for the sinnes of the world For such satisfaction was abundantly made by the meere death of the Crosse Yet were these his unknowne or unexperienced sufferings in the Garden either necessary or most expedient for his Qualification and Consecration to his everlasting Priesthood that he might be a mercifull and faithfull high Priest able to compassionate and succour all such as are in any kind tempted Briefly seeing one speciall part of his Priesthood is to make intercession and supplication for us in all our distresses it was in the wisdome of God expedient that he should haue just occasion to offer up prayers and supplications with strong cryes for himselfe And in asmuch as these his supplications were heard of his Father we have assurance that he will not cease to make intercession for us untill God grant us deliverance from temptations so we pray unto him in such feare and reverence as he in his agony did unto his Father He will in this case doe for us as he desired his Father to doe for him 5 It seemeth the Consecration of legall high Priests so long as they accurately observed the rites and manner prescribed by Moses did one way or other cost them so deare that no man which duly weighed the charge laid upon them would be very ambitious of the office Hence saith our Apostle Heb. 5. 4. No man taketh this honour unto himselfe but he that is called of God as Aaron was So likewise Christ tooke not to himself this honour to be made an high Priest but he that said unto him Thou art my sonne this day have I begotten thee put this charge or honour upon him against his will questionlesse as man albeit hee most obediently submitted himselfe to his Fathers will because hee had taken the forme of a Servant upon him His Consecration we may safely avouch cost him dearer then the Consecration of all the legall Priests that had been before him or of all the Christian Bishops or Prelates which have lived since did or doth them whether severally or joyntly Never did any man utter those words
so truly and sincerely Episcopari nolo as hee did or pray so earnestly that the charge of his Consecration might be mitigated whilst hee was in his agony But how deare soever his Consecration cost him the costs and charges of it though altogether unknown to us were recompenced by the purchase which he gained by it For as it followeth being thus consecrated he became the Author of everlasting salvation to all that obey him and their salvation was and is as pleasant to him as his sufferings whereby he was consecrated were for the present distastfull CHAP. 4. The Consecration of the Sonne of God was not finisht immediately after his Agony in the Garden nor was he then or at the time of his sufferings upon the Crosse an actuall or compleat high Priest after the Order of Melchisedech BVt was his Consecration finished immediately after hee had beene anointed with his owne blood in the Garden or assoone as his prayers and supplications which hee offered up with strong cryes and teares were heard No whatsoever else was required for his Qualification there could be no true and perfect Consecration to his Priesthood without a Sacrifice without a bloody Sacrifice This was one principall part of Aarons Consecration to his legall Priesthood and so of his Successors But here the Iew who is for the most part lesse learned then perverse and captious will in this particular shrewdly object if not thus insult over the negligence of many Christian teachers When your crucified God was convented by the high Priests and Elders when he was arraign'd before Pontius Pilate when he was sentenced to the death of the Crosse tell us plainly whether in any of these points of time mentioned he were truly a Priest or no Priest If no Priest at all what had hee to doe to offer any Sacrifice especially a bloody one For this was a service so peculiar to the legall Priests which were the sonnes of Aaron that it was sacriledge for the sonnes of David For the greatest Kings of Iudah to attempt it If you will say then he was a Priest you must acknowledge him either to have beene a Priest after the order of Melchisedech or after the order of Aaron If you say hee was a Priest after the order of Aaron you plainly contradict this Apostle whom you acknowledge to be the great Teacher of you Gentiles for he saith Chap. 7. v. 14. of this Epistle It is evident that our Lord sprang out of Iudah concerning which Tribe Moses spake nothing concerning the Priesthood And againe Chap. 8. v. 4. hee saith Hee were not a Priest if hee were earth seeing there are Priests which according to the Law offer gifts Now if he could be no Priest were he now on earth then certainly he could be no Priest after the order of Aaron nor did he offer any legall or bloody sacrifice whilst he lived as sometimes he did here on earth 2 Was he then whilst hee lived here on earth a Priest after the order of Melchisedech and by this title authorized to offer sacrifice This I presume you dare not avouch For Melchisedech was a Priest according to endlesse life his Priesthood was an immortall everlasting Priesthood Now although every man be not an high Priest yet every high Priest must be a man and a man taken from amongst ordinary men to offer gifts and sacrifices for sinne The Priesthood is an accident the humanitie or manhood is the subject or substance which supports it Dare you then say that a mortall man whilst he was such could possibly be an everlasting Priest or a Priest according to an endlesse life when he was to dye a miserable and ignominious death the very same day Durum esset hoc affirmare This indeed is a hard saying a point of Doctrine whose intimation did cause the Iews such as were in part our Saviours Disciples or very inclinable to his service to question the truth of his calling and of his sayings Iohn 12. v. 32. c. And I if I were lift up from the earth will draw all men unto me Now this he said saith S. Iohn signifying what death he should dye to wit the death of the Crosse And so his Auditors conceived his meaning and for this reason the people answered him We have heard out of the Law that the Christ abideth for ever and how sayest thou the sonne of man must be lift up Who is that son of man v. 34. This people at that time had a cleare prenotion or received opinion that their promised Messias or the Christ should be a Priest after the order of Melchisedech that is a Priest to endure for ever for the Lord had confirmed thus much by oath Psalme 110. And out of this common prenotion whether first conceived out of that place of David The Lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedech or from some other Scripture the people in the fore-cited place questioned whether it were possible hee should be the Christ seeing by his owne confession he was shortly after to dye the death of the Crosse 3 These objections I confesse could hardly be answered if wee should grant what many moderne Divines out of incogitancy have taught or taken upon trust without further examination to wit that the eternall Sonne of God our Lord and Saviour was an high Priest from eternitie or an high Priest from his birth as man or from his Baptisme when hee was anointed by the holy Ghost unto his Propheticall function or whilst he was upon the Crosse But not granting this as wee have no reason to admit any branch of it the answer to the former objection is clear and easie Betwixt a Priest compleat or actually consecrated and no Priest at all datur medium participationis there is a meane or third estate or condition to wit a Priest in fieri though not in facto or a Priest inter consecrandum that is in the interims of his Consecration before hee be actually and compleatly consecrated Such a man or rather such a Priest was Aaron during the first sixe or seven dayes of his Consecration yet dare no Iew avouch that after the first or second day of his separation from common men he was no more then an ordinary man no Priest at all nor that on the seaventh day he was a Priest actually consecrated but as yet in his Consecration He was not till the eight day qualified to offer up Sacrifices unto God but had peculiar Sacrifices offered for his Consecration by Moses 4 Briefly then the Sacrifice of the Sonne of God upon the Crosse whether we consider it as of fered by himselfe or by his Father as it is sometimes said in Scripture to be offered by both was the absolute accomplishment of all legall Sacrifices or services Aaronicall And yet but an intermediate though an especiall part of his Consecration to the Priesthood after the order of Melchisedech not the ultimum
world which shall not last for ever Besides the inconveniences which they multiply by this vaine apology for their wicked practices we must of necessity acknowledge Melchisedech to have beene a type of figure not of Christ or not of Christ only or not so properly of him as of the whole generation of Masse Priests and his sacrifice to have beene a truer type of the unbloody sacrifice which they dayly offer then of Christ's bloody everlasting sacrifice upon the Crosse Yea the meanest most illiterate and lewdest masse Priest should be as true a Successor of Melchisedech of Christ himselfe as Phineas or Eleazar were of Aaron 5 Mariana in his briefe comment or large notes upon the 14 th of Genesis boldly avoucheth the unbloody sacrifice of the Masse to have beene prefigured by Melchisedech's sacrifice of bread and wine But the point it selfe he toucheth so gently as if hee had desired to have balked it as indeed he doth but wave it and questionlesse hee would have omitted it as hee doth many other tenets maintained by the Church of Rome when he comes to interpret those Scriptures whereon ancient Schoolmen or vulgar Commentators have laboured to ground them But unto the fore-cited history of Melchisedech because it is held such a principall fort of the Romish ReligioÌ„ he durst not but doe his wonted homage intimating withall that hee had somewhat more to say to this point when hee should come to interpret the Epistle to the Hebrewes But albeit he lived to finish his intended worke or learned Scholia upon the Bible yet when hee came to the seaventh Chapter to the Hebrewes all he had to say was to referre us to what hee had said upon the fourteenth of Genesis And to this reference he addes such a caveat or an appendix as if he would give us to understand that hee had said more upon the fourteenth of Genesis then hee could tell how to make good out of S. Paul's parallel between Melchisedech our Saviour Christ Miror in hoc Capite inter tot similitudines quibus Melchisedech Christum representat nihil dixisse de sacrificio Panis Vini quod Melchisedech obtulit ut diximus Gen. 14. 18. Symbolum nostri sacrificii Eucharistiae de qua malo alios audire quam ipse pronuntiare indicasse sit satis Mariana in 20 septimi Cap. ad Hebraeos 6 The youngest this day living whether in the English or Romish Church though he dye for very age shall not live to read or heare any Iesuit or other Advocate of the Romish Church give any satisfactory answer to this briefe demand The answer on our part is very easy because the Question on their part is foolish Our answer is that the Apostle was not to medle with more comparisons betweene Christ and Melchisedech then were true in themselves and intended by the holy Ghost of which number this fiction of the Romish Church concerning Melchisedech's sacrifice of bread and wine is no part or appurtinance neither doth the letter of the Text or any circumstance of the history unpartiall Antiquitie or any orthodoxall rule of interpretation favour it CHAP. II. In respect of what points especially the Priesthood of Melchisedech did fore-picture the Priesthood of the Sonne of God BVt if the Priesthood of Melchisedech did not herein specially differ from the Priesthood of Aaron in that Melchisedech did offer an unbloody sacrifice whereas the offerings of Aaron were for the most part bloody sacrifices what other difference can we with probabilitie conceive betwixt them or wherein did Melchisedech's sacerdotall function more excellently fore-picture our Saviours Priesthood then the Priesthood of Aaron did For as Aaron and his Successors did offer bloody sacrifices aswell dayly as anniversary so the Sonne of God did offer up himselfe in bloody sacrifice upon the Crosse and by this offering up of himselfe once for all did accomplish whatsoever was fore-pictured by all manner of bloody sacrifices which Aaron and his posterity were authorized to of fer To this Quare the answer hath been premised and it was this That when the Sonne of God did offer up himselfe upon the Crosse he was neither a Priest after the order of Aaron nor of Melchisedech but a Priest in fieri or in his Consecration fore shadowed by Melchisedech And after the Consecration was accomplished hee was not to offer any sacrifice at all either bloody or unbloody Though we dare not say Melchisedech did never offer any bloody or other sacrifice yet wee doe not read of any which he offered This part of his function if at any time he ever exercised it is omitted of purpose by the holy Ghost as his genealogie is that by this representation of him hee might more exactly foreshadow the Priesthood of the Sonne of God who after his Consecration was not to offer any sacrifice at all All the similitudes intended by the Apostle betweene Melchisedech and our high Priest consist especially in these three First in the identitie of their titles In the greatnesse of their persons and in the authoritative manner of bestowing their blessings For the identitie or analogie of their titles is a point which hath beene discussed before Some scruple is cast by an Author before mentioned that this title of King of Salem should be as nominall a title as Melchisedech or King of righteousnesse was But if this conjecture were trne our Apostle had instiled him when he interprets the importance of his titles not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as he did the former title Melchisedech King of righteousnesse or the righteous King Heb. 7. 1. Melchisedech was his praenomen or a name given unto him by such as had beene sensible of his righteous dealing with his subjects or neighbourhoods But when the Apostle saith he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this denotes the place or territory where of he was not by name only but by just inheritance King 2 For the greatnesse of his person or place in those times that we must learne from our Apostle Heb. 7. 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Now consider how great this man or this Priest was unto whom even the Patriarch Abraham gave the tenth of the spoiles And verily they that are of the sonnes of Levi who receive the office of the Priesthood have a commandement to take â—â—â—â—s of the people according to the Law that is of their Bretheren though they came out of the loines of Abraham But hee whose descent is not counted from them for he lived and died some centuries of yeares before them received tithes of Abraham and blessed him that had the promises and without contradiction the lesse is blessed of the better And here men that die receive tithes but there he receiveth them of whom it is witnessed That he liveth as I may so say Levi also who received tithes payed tithes in Abraham or was tithed in Abraham for he was yet in the loines of his
God's name for ever And what more could be said in the assertive sence of our high Priest Or what argument can there be drawne from sacred authority that the Priesthood of Aaron should not be that the Priesthood of the sonne of David should be everlasting and unchangeable The only sure ground of this inference is that mentioned by our Apostle because Aaron and his sonnes were made Priests were destinated and authorized to their function without an Oath whereas the sonne of David was destinated and assigned to his Priesthood after the order of Melchisedech by solemne Oath interposed by him that said Thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedech which words are three or foure times reiterated in this Chapter The contents or importances of the Oath are most divinely expressed by the Apostle from v. 23. to the end of the Chapter And they truly were many Priests because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death but this man or rather this Priest because he continueth for ever hath an unchangeable Priesthood wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him seeing hee ever liveth to make intercession for them for such an high Priest became us who is holy harmlesse undefiled separate from sinnes and higher then the heavens who needeth not dayly as those high Priests to offer up sacrifice first for his owne sinnes and then for the peoples for this he did once when hee offered up himselfe For the Law maketh men high Priests which have infirmitie but the word of the Oath which was since the Law maketh the Sonne who is Consecrated for evermore Christ the sonne of David was a mortall man before hee was consecrated to be an immortall Priest for his very death was a part of his Consecration And after the accomplishment of his Consecration the Priesthood of Aaron became void as being never confirmed by Oath For all things not so confirmed are at the best but commensurable to time or succession and time it selfe shall be abolished by oath Rev. 10. 6. Iuravit per viventem tempus non fore amplius That opinion of some heathen Philosophers as of Hierocles concerning the endlesse succession of time or perpetuall continuance of all things according to the course of nature which now they hold is probable did take its originall from a mistake or misapplication of the tradition or prenotion concerning the stabilitie or everlasting condition of things confirmed by Oath He with some others apply this undoubted rule unto things temporall or to this present world which holds true only of the world to come SECT 4. By what Persons and in what manner the Consecration of Iesus Christ the Son of God to his Priesthood was prefigured CHAP. 21. That Iesus or Iehoshua the sonne of Nun Zerubbabel the sonne of Shealtiel and Iesus the sonne of Iehosadeck were speciall Types of Iesus Christ the Sonne of God respectively as he was to be made and now is both King and Prâ—est SOme good Historians have observed that many famous Kingdomes have been ruinated or extinguished under Princes of the same name with those that first did erect or advance them Darius the first King of that name in Persia made his Country famous and the Persians Lords of the best part of the inhabited world Another Darius makes Alexander famous by his mighty overthrow and raiseth up the Monarchy of Macedon by the fall of the Persian Augustus was the second great Caesar and the first perpetuall Roman Emperour and in Augustulus the very â—â—le of Emperour did die not so much as a shadow of the Roman Empire remained after him Constantine the great did first erect the Easterne Empire and founded the City of Constantinople the first of all Emperours that did publikely defend the Christian faith Another Constantine was the last Emperour of Constantinople leaving the Empire to the disposall of the Turke Baldwin Compeere of Godfrey of Bulloigne in the conquest of the Holy land and after his death created King of Ierusalem established this new King dome in peace which hee had wonne by warre Another of the same name and race leaves the Holy land it selfe for a prey unto the superstitious Mahumetan not repossest since his death by any Christian Prince 2 Nor doe humane stories only though many besides these alleadged might be produced afford us instances or observations in this ranke The visible Kingdome or Common-wealth of Israel taking Israel for the whole race of Iacob was first establish't and setled in peace by Hosea the son of Nun whom Moses upon fore-sight of this his good successe in planting the people of God in the land of their promised rest named Iehoshua that is to say a Savior In the dayes of Hosea the son of Elah did Israel as opposed unto the Kingdome of David that is tenne Tribes of twelve utterly cease to be a Nation Both King and people were led captives by Shalmanezar King of Assyria The Kingdome likewise or Common-wealth of Iudah did finally expire and determine under Iesus the sonne of David but altogether through this peoples fault hee never ceast to be a Saviour a greater Saviour of his people then Iesus the sonne of Nun had beene for hee was Salus ipsa Salvation it selfe But his people was become so wicked that salvation it selfe could not save them or preserve their common-wealth from ruine Howbeit to speake the truth this Iesus our Lord and Saviour did rather translate the Kindome of Iudah and David from earth to heaven then suffer it utterly to perish He still remaines a King and of his Kingdome there shall be no end though his Kingdome be not of this world nor over Israel or Iacob according to the flesh yet hee still ruleth in Iacob unto the ends of the world and so shall rule world without end This translation of the Kingdome of Iudah and David from earth to heaven or this new erection of this heavenly Kingdome by Iesus Christ our Savior was prefigured by onother Iesus as lively a Type or shadow of Christ as Iesus the sonne of Nun had been 3 For after Iudah through her riot and intemperancy had procured her bane as her sister Samaria had done and was carried for dead out of the dwellings wherein Iesus the sonne of Nun had first seated her the Lord in his all-foreseeing providence and in signe what was after to be accomplished and fulfilled concerning the Kingdome of David would have another Iesus the sonne of Iehosedeck to let Iudah after her recovery from captivity or civill death on her feet againe So it is specified 2. Esdras 3. Zach. 3. Haggai 2. that at this peoples returne from Babylon into their land Ieshua or Iesus the sonne of Iehosedeck was their high Priest and herein a Type of Christ as hee is our high Priest and Saviour Zerubbabel a Prince of the Tribe of Iudah and one of David's Line under whose conduct this people
give the month wherein that deliverance was wrought the preheminence of all the months in the year whereas before that time the month of September in which the feast of Attonement was celebrated was for order of time or accompt the first as being the season according to the tradition of the Hebrewes and in all probability of reason wherein the world was first created And after the month of Abib had by God's appointment got the preeminence of all other months yet the month Tisri or September still retaines the precedency in the civill accompt of the Hebrewes for matters temporall or secular The accompt of their yeares in matters of contract or bargaine as of morgage or purchase was alwaies to be taken from Iubile to Iubile or from one Sabbaticall or seventh yeare to another And the yeare of Iubile or Sabbaticall yeare did alwaies begin and end in the month of September And as wee of this land have two accompts the one from the yeare of the Lord the other from the raigne of the King so had the Hebrewes two accompts of the yeare more distinct and certaine then ours are The one for matters civill or secular according to which accompt September was the first month and March the seventh month The other for matters Ecclesiasticall or spirituall and according to this accompt the month of Abib or March was the first month and September the seventh month And because matters spirituall or belonging to the service of God or state of his Church were the matters which God did principally respect in the institution of his Law therefore the month Abib or March after this peoples deliverance from Egypt though not before was to be accompted the prime and principall month 8 So then albeit the feast of Attonement and the feast of the Passeover differ as much in respect of the distance of time as any two feasts in the yeare can doe as having just halfe a yeare betwixt them yet for identity of season or congruity of other circumstances they agree the best Both of them are in their kinds the first months light and darknesse hold the same proportion in both Both of them distribute day and night by equall ballance to all the inhabitants of the earth Iohn Baptist's conception fell upon the feast of Attonement and the solemnity of this feast was in diverse respects accomplished by our Saviour at his Baptisme or Consecration to his propheticall function Our Saviour's owne conception was about the feast of the Passeover and fitting it was for congruity of time that hee should finish the course of his mortall life and accomplish all the legall sacrifices by the bloody sacrifice of himselfe upon that day at that time wherein hee had received the first beginning of life as man fitting it was that he should be conceived to life immortall in the wombe of the earth upon the same day or at that time wherein he had first been conceived in the Virgins wombe to the miseries and fraile estate of mortality Briefly then in the alienation of preheminence or precedency from September to March the translation of the Attonement or Expiation from the one month or the other was included and foreshadowed The month Abib was by God's appointment made the first and principall month of the whole yeare with reference to this great worke of finall Attonement or Expiation which was to be wrought in it by the bloody sacrifice of the high Priest in which all other sacrifices and solemnities had their end and finall accomplishment There was no legall feast of Attonement to be celebrated after it 9 Againe for circumstance of time it was most fitting and congiuous that the second tabernacle should be erected at the same time and season wherein the first tabernacle was erected that the high Priest of the new testament or everlasting tabernacle should be consecrated at the same season wherein the high Priest of the Old Testament or earthly tabernacle was consecrated Now the first tabernacle was erected and Aaron the high Priest thereof consecrated in the first month Abib as is apparent from Exod. 40. v. 2. The tabernacle was begun to be set up upon the first day of that month and was twelve daies in erection Aaron was seven daies in his Consecration but whether he was consecrated in the first seven daies of the month or whether his Consecration begun from the eighth day and lasted to the fifteenth is all one for congruity of circumstance between the Consecration of Aaron and the Cōsecration of our high Priest Sometimes it so falls out that the Evangelicall misteries begin where the legall shadowes doe end and are as it were ushered in by them some-times againe the misteries fulfilled upon the same day wherein the legall services or solemnities which fore-shadowed them were or ought to have been celebrated But it is more then probable from many circumstances Levit. 8. that Aaron's Consecration did not begin till the seventh or eighth day of the month Abid and ended the fourteenth or fifteenth CHAP. 25. In what respects the Consecration of Aaron and of his sonnes did especially prefigure the Consecration of the Sonne of God and in what respects they specially differ That the Consecration of Aaron did in diverse respects serve as a foile to set forth the excellencie of the Consecration of the Sonne of God COncerning the Consecration of Aaron and his sonnes you may read at large Exod 29. Levit. 8. Their Consecration consisted partly in the sacrifices offered by Moses for them partly in other services or solemnities either performed by them or done unto them The Priests of the Law even Aaron the first high Priest himselfe was to be consecrated by Moses the man of God The high Priest of the New Testament was to be consecrated by God the Father by him that had sworne to make him a Priest after the order of Melchisedech Wee are not to parallel the Sonne of God and Aaron according to every part or solemnitie of their Consecration at least we are not to compare every part or particular in kind For in Aarons Consecration there be many circumstances which necessarily imply presuppose or argue such imperfections and defects either in Aaron's person or in the sacrifices or rites by which he was consecrated as may not so much as be imagined in our high Priest in his sacrifice or any part of his service But rather these imperfections in Aaron's person in his sacrifice or Priesthood doe serve as foiles to set forth the excellent and absolute perfection of our high Priests person of his sacrifice and of his Priesthood First it was a defect or imperfection in Aaron's person that hee should stand in neede of a sinne-offring or of an offring of Attonement to make him capable of the dignity of legall Priesthood or of his Consecration to it This dissimilitude betweene the Person of the high Priest of the Old Testament and the high Priest of the New is exprest by our
Christ once for all Hebr. 10. 10. Every Priest standeth dayly ministring and offering oftimes the same sacrifices which can never take away sinnes but this man or rather this Priest after he had once offered one sacrifice for sinnes for ever sate downe on the right hand of God and henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool For by one offering he hath consecrated for ever them that are sanctified ver 11. 12. 13. 5 As many as have reaped or hereafter shall reape any benefit either from Gods's Oath to Abraham concerning his seede in whom all the Nations of the earth were to be blessed or from the Renewing of this Oath to David concerning his son which was to be the Dispenser of this blessing and to be made a Priest after the order of Melchisedech who blessed Abraham all and every one of them are consecrated to the patticipation of this blessing by the Consecration of this our high Priest the Sonne of God The Law saith the Apostle makes men high Priests which have infirmity but the word of the Oath which was since the Law maketh the Sonne high Priest who is consecrated for evermore and by this his Consecration wee even all the Israel of God are consecrated by an everlasting Consecration So saith the Apostle Revel 1. 5. Iesus Christ the first begotten of the dead and Prince of the Kings of the earth hath washed us from our sins in his owne Blood and hath made us Kings and Priests that is Priests after the order of Melchisedech unto God and his Father By this his Consecration likewise to his everlasting Priesthood we are hallowed and consecrated as Temples to our God so saith S. Peter 1. Pet. 2. v. 4. 5. To whom comming as to a living stone disallowed indeed of men but chosen of God and precious yee also as lively stones are built up a spirituall house an holy Priesthood to offer up a spirituall sacrifice acceptable to God by Iesus Christ 5 But to take the severall bloody sacrifices which were offered at the Consecration of Aaron and his sonnes into more particular consideration Albeit these sacrifices were all imperfect not only absolutely or in respect of our high Priest's everlasting sacrifice but even in respect of these spirituall sacrifices mentioned by S. Peter which wee are to offer unto God yet were they all in their kind most perfect The best and chiefest in the whole ranke of legall or Aaronicall sacrifices they are as so many lineaments pourtraying in part or fore-shadowing that body or accomplishment not of them only but of all other sacrifices All meet in it as so many lines in their Center The first bloody sacrifice that was offered at the Consecration of Aaron was a Bullock The Priests might offer no other sacrifice then this for their owne sinne-offering because this was of all other the best and yet in comparison of this saith the Psalmist in the Person of this our high Priest in his affliction I will praise the name of God with a song and will magnifie him with thanksgiving this alâ—o shall please the Lord better then a bullock which hath hornes and hoofes that is beginning to spread the horne and hoofe for at that time they were most fit for sacrifice Psal 69. ver 30. 31. His meaning was that this sacrifice of thanksgiving should be more acceptable unto God then the very best sacrifice of the Law and so it was especially whilst offered by our high Priest even when he offered his bloody sacrifice upon the Crosse and after his enemies had given him vineger in his thirst to drink For after he had uttered that pittifull Song of the Psalmist Psal 22. whether only out of his griefe or anguish or upon other respects and intentions My God my God why hast Thou for saken Me he finally commends his soule his spirit unto his Father in the words of the Psalmists Song Ps 35. Father into thy hands I coÌ„mend my spirit The uttering of both these Songs in this anguish of soule argues hee lov'd his God and our God his Father and our Father with all his soule with all his heart with all his strength and his performance of this great Commandement as the Scribe which approved his answer to the Pharisees to the Herodians and the Sadduces had a litle before confest upon his answer to his Question was more then all whole burnt offrings and sacrifices Mat. 12. from v. 12. to 34. CHAP. 26. In what respects the Bullock offered at the Consecration of Aaron c. and the rites of offering â—â— did prefigure the bloody sacrifice of the Sonne of God especially the circumstances of the place wherein it was offered BVt you will aske wherein did the Sacrifice of the Bullock which was offered for a sinne-offering or Attonement at Aaron's Consecration or the circumstances in offering it punctually fore-shadow the bloody Sacrifice which our high Priest offered at his Consecration or the manner or circumstance of his offering it It did in circumstance at least prefigure the Sacrifice of our high Priest after the same manner or in respect of the same circumstance that the annuall sacrifices of Attonement did prefiure it of which hereafter Inasmuch as the head and flesh c. of the Bullock for sinne-offering or Attonement for Aaron at his Consecation was to be offered or burnt without the campe not to be burnt upon the Altar It fell under the same Law and undergoes the same considerations which the annuall-Sacrifices in the feast of Attonement did For so it is expressely commanded Exod. 29. 14. That the flesh of the Bullock and his skinne should be burnt without the Camp because it was a sin-offering Now it was an universall and peremptory Law that no flesh of any Sacrifice whose Blood was brought into the Sanctuary to make Attonement should be eaten by the Priests in the Sanctuary 2 It was againe a Law as peremptory that the Priests especially the high Priests might that is had power to eat the flesh of any Sacrifice whose Blood was not brought into the Sanctuary For to this purpose Moses Levit. 10. 17. expostulateth with Aaron's sonnes which were left after the death of Nadab and Abihu Wherefore have yee not eaten the sinne-offering in the holy place for it is the holy of holies and it vz. the flesh of the sin-offring he hath given to you to beare the iniquity of the Congregation to make Attonement for them before the Lord Behold the Blood of it was not brought in behold indeed you should have eaten it in the holy place as I commanded you Aaron in his Apologie for his sonnes against this accusation of Moses in no case questions the truth or extent of this commandement but rather excuseth himselfe and his sonnes for not observing the purport of the Law as the case stood with them his two sonnes Nadab and Abihu being lately consumed with fire issuing out from before the Lord for offering strange fire which
he had not commanded them upon his Altar And seeing that although they had put off all the respect of the obedience of his sonnes yet could he not put off the affection of a loving Father towards them or suddenly cease to mourne for their untimely death whereas to have eaten the Sacrifices in the holy place with a sad countenance or heavy heare had been to pollute it So that this sad and ivofull accident made the eating of the sinne-offring in the holy place unlawfull or unexpedient to him and his sonnes which ordinarily or in case no such accident had befallen them had not only been lawfull but necessary But seeing the blood of the Bullock offered for Aaron's sinne-offering at his CoÌ„secration had not been brought into the Sanctuary and seeing no such wofull accident or legall impediment had at this time befallen Aaron and his sonnes it may justly be questioned what was the reason they did not eate the flesh of this their sinne-offring or Attonement It was a sufficient warrant unto them not to eat it because the Lord had forbidden it Exod. 29. 14. But if it be demanded what was the reason or intent of this Law or rather of this particular exception from the generall Law by which they were commanded to eate it Some make answer that Aaron and his sonnes were not as yet compleat Priests or Priests already consecrated but in their Consecration only and therefore were not comprehended under the generall Law which commanded the Priest forbidding all others to eate the flesh of the sinne-offering whose blood was not brought into the Sanctuary But this reason concludes only in probability against Aaron and his sonnes who did now attend their Consecration it no waies concludes against Moses who did consecrate them who was not only permitted but commanded by God to eate of all the Sacrifices or offrings which Aaron's sonnes or Successors might lawfully eate yet did not Moses eate any part of the Bullock offered at Aaron's Consecration for a sinne-offring or Attonement for God had expressely commanded it to be burnt without the Campe. Their answer therefore to that former demand is more pertinent who say that no high Priest whether ordinarily called or extraordinarily as Moses was for the Consecration of Aaron and his sonnes might eate of any sacrifice which was offered for a sinne-offring or Attonement for the Priests themselves although the Blood of it were not brought into the Sanctuary Of the Sinne-offrings for the people whose Blood was not brought into the Sanctuary the Priests might eate they were to eate 2. This commandement for them to eate of the peoples sinne-offring argues the sinnes of the people were to be borne or taken away by the Priest The prohibition for the Priests to eat the Sinne-offrings made for themselves argues the sinnes of the Priest could not be borne or taken away by the Priests of the Law or their sacrifices but were to expect a better sacrifice of a better high Priest The legall sacrifices in the meane time were to be offered in a place prefiguring the place wherein this better Sacrifice was to be offered a place without the gates of Ierusalem Whiles the people wandred in the wildernesse without any setled habitation or City to dwell in the Sacrifice or substance of the Sinne-offring was to be consumed with fire without the trenches or bounds wheresoever they did encampe as Souldiers doe in the open field neere unto the Arke of the Testament But after the Arke had found a setled habitation or resting place in the Temple which Salomon built the City of Ierusalem in which the Temple stood became the Campe of Israel And this and other like sodeiâ—â—ties and services which were commanded to be performed without the Campe whiles the people wandred in the wildernesse were to be performed without the gates of Ierusalem albeit the Sacrifice was to be offered in the Temple whence seeing our Saviour's Body was the offring for sinne or the Sacrifice of Attonement by which the mysteries imported by all other Sacrifices were fulfilled it was to be consumed or brought into the dust of death in Mount Calvary or Golgotha or some place without the City So that the Apostle's argument Heb. 13. drawne from the annuall Sacrifices of Attonement concludes as punctually for this Sacrifice of Aâ—â—onement or Sinne-offring at Aaron's Consecration We have an Altar whereof they have no right to eate which serve at the Tabernacle for the bodies of those beasts whose blood is brought into the Sanctuary by the high Priest for sinne as also of those beasts which were offered for the Priests Sin-offring at the Consecration albeit their Blood were not brought into the Sanctuary are burnt without the Campe. Wherefore Iesus also that he might sanctifie the people with his owne Blood suffered without the gate Now this sanctification of God's people by Christ's Blood was their Consecration with him to be Kings and Priests as he was now made King and Priest that is a Priest after the order of Melchisedech and as he himselfe saith Iohn 17. 29. For their sakes I sanctifie my selfe that is I undergoe the rites of Consecration prefigured by the Law that they also may be sanctified through the truth or truly sanctified that is after a better manner then they could be sanctified or consecrated by the legall Sacrifices ceremonies or services of the Law 3 The second sort of bloody Sacrifices offered by Moses at the Consecration of Aaron and his sons were two Rammes the one for a burnt offring to the Lord for a sweet Savour and offring made by fire unto the Lord. Exod. 29. 18. The mystery hereby fore-signified at our Saviour's Confecration is expressed by the Apostle Ephes 5. 1. 2. Be yee therefore followers of God as deare Children and walke in love as Christ also hath loved us and hath given himselfe for us an offring and a Sacrifice to God for a sweete smelling savour The other Ramme was to be offered as a peace offring and is called by Moses Exod. 29. the Ramme of Aaron's Consecration ver 26. because Aaron and his sonnes were to be annointed with the Blood of it CHAP. 27. In what respects the Ramme of the Consecration and the Ramme which God did provide for a burnt offring instead of Isanck did prefigure the sacrifice of the Son of God Of other speciall rites wherein Aaron at his Consecration and in the function of his Priesthood did prefigure the Consecration and Priest hood of the Son of God NOw if we consider the speciall references of the Aaronicall Priesthood there could no fitter Sacrifice be offered for Aaron and his sonnes at their Consecration then the Sacrifice of Rammes no other Sacrifices used in the Law could be so fit an embleme or representation of our high Priest's Sacrifice at his Consecration The points whereto the Aaronicall Priesthood whether during the time of their Consecration or after Aaron and his sonnes were consecrated Priests had peculiar reference
naturally beare In the mountain the Lord or Iehovah will be seene And this Proverbe taken up upon these occasions in whether sence or construction you list to take it was more then a Proverbe a true mystery or mysticall prophecy exactly fulfilled in the crucifying of our Saviour The Lord in the Mount did see and was seene by his speciall providence when hee provided the Ramme for a sacrifice instead of Isaac The mountaine whereon Abraham purposed to have offered Isaac as he was commanded by God for a burnt offering was one of the mountaines in the land of Moriah and that as all interpreters agree was about the place wherein Ierusalem was afterwards built most are of opinion that it was that part of mount Sion wherein the Temple was afterwards built wherein the threshing-floore of Arauna stood which David consecrated for the Altar of God But whether it were this mountaine or mount Calvary I will not dispute Mount Calvary likewise was in the land of Moriah and in this mountaine Iehovah did see and was seene he did in this mountain provide himselfe of a Lambe for a burnt offering he himselfe became a Lambe or visible sacrifice for our sinnes by whose blood he himselfe and wee in him were consecrated Priests to God the Father The other circumstances whether concerning Isaac or the Lambe were visibly and remarkably accomplished in the sacrifice of the Sonne of God Isaac did beare wood for the sacrifice up into the mountaine where Abraham intended to sacrifice him The Sonne of God did bear the wood of the Crosse whereon he was sacrificed at least part of it up to mount Calvary The Ramme which God provided instead of Isaac was caught by the hornes in the thicket of brambles or thornes and the Lambe of God the Sonne of God marched to his Crosse with a Crowne of thornes and brambles upon his head as most of the Fathers and best moderne interpreters collect from the Evangelists story For where it is said that they tooke off the purple robe and other royall ensignes wherewith they had in mockery invested him it is not mentioned that they tooke off this Crown of thornes this was the thicket wherein the murtherers caught him For as yee know he was condemned upon pretence that he affected the Crowne of David and suffered himselfe to be entitled and saluted the King of the Iewes and in derision of this great mystery which they understood not they put a Crowne of thornes upon his head and crucify him in it 4 But whilst the Princes of the earth and the Rulers take counsell against him while the heathen-Souldiers and Iewish pepole doe rage and make a mock of him hec that sate in the heavens laught them to scorne what they did act in jest or scorne here on earth he turnes into earnest and ratifies by an everlasting decree in heaven They cloath the Sonne of God with a purple or royall robe and bowing their knees thus they salute him Haile King of the Iewes unwittingly fore-prophecying as Caiphas did as well by matter of fact as by word that God would now annoint the Sonne of David to be that King over Sion to whom all knees should bow of things in heaven of things on the earth of things under the earth They in despite and bitter scoffes wreath a Crown of thornes or brambles about his head and fastened it on with a reede or mock-scepter which they had put into his hand litle considering that hee which sate in the heavens did consecrate him here by this part of his afflictions to the wearing of that everlasting Crowne of glory which David Psal 132. had fore-told should flourish upon him whilst his enemies were cloathed with shame ver 18. And of this Crowne of Glory as well the royall Diadem or Crowne of David wherein his Successors were enthronized as the Crowne of holinesse wherein Aaron and his Successors the high Priests were consecrated were but the shadowes or models and so no question was the Crowne upon the Arke or Mercy-seat And it is a point which I will commend unto the serious reader's observation specially in the reading of the apocalyps or the Revelation that in all or most part of the visions made to S. Iohn the Disciple whom hee loved of Christ in his glory he still appeares and his appearance is still emblazoned by this Disciple in some one or other of the robes which Aaron used at his Consecration Sometimes he appeares with a garment downe to the foot and girt about the paps with a golden girdle Such were the robes and girdle of Aaron the high Priest and to shew that his Saints were consecrated likewise in his Consecration his Saints or Angels appeared thus cloathed unto Iohn Rev. 15. ver 5. 6. And after that I looked and behold the Temple of the Tabernacle of the testimony in heaven was opened and the seven Angels came out of the Temple having the seven plagues cloathed in pure and white linnen and having their brests girded with golden girdleâ— Sometimes he appears with a Crown upon his head 5 His Pallace or Kingdome likewise his walke or verge is emblazoned or set forth by the materiall Temple the ministerie likewise of his glorified Saints and Angels But of this hereafter 6 Those temporary flashes of Royall salutations and greetings which the multitude tendred unto him when hee came into Ierusalem to be consecrated were ratified by an everlasting decree in heaven So 't is said Revel 7. 9. 10. And after this I beheld and loe a great multitude which no man could number of all Nations and kindreds and people and tongues stood before the Throne and before the Lambe cloathed with white robes and palmes in their hands and cried with a loud voice saying Salvation unto our God which sitteh upon the throne and unto the Lambe This was the accomplishment of the multitude's crying Hosanna to the sonne of David with palme branches in their hands and those which thus cryed in heaven are they as the Angell instructs S. Iohn which came out of great tribulation and have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lambe therefore are they before the throne of God and serve him day and night in his Temple and hee that sitteth on the throne shall dwell among them Revel 7. 14. 15. c. This washing of their garments in the blood of the Lambe was likewise prefigured in the Consecration of Aaron Exod. 29. 21. Thou shalt also take of the blood that is on the Altar and of the anointing oile and sprinkle it upon Aaron and upon his garments and upon his sonnes and upon the garments of his sonnes with him and hee shall be hallowed and his garments and his sonnes and his sonnes garments with him This blood wherewith their garments were sprinkled was the blood of the Ramme of the Consecration whose blood likewise Moses as it is in the 20 th verse was commanded to take and put it
upon the tip of the right eare of Aaron and upon the tip of the right eares of his sonnes and upon the thumbe of their right hand and upon the great toe of their right foot and sprinkle the blood c. This ceremony or service was literally and punctually fulfilled in the Consecration of our high Priest The high Priest of the Law was consecrated with forreigne blood with the blood of Rammes The high Priest of the New Testament was consecrated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with his owne blood and in this blood not only his hands his feet or eares were sprinkled or annointed but his whole body was annointed or bathed For though he was alwaies internally sanctified and though this his internall sanctification was most absolute and perfect from the wombe yet would the Lord have him thus visibly and externally consecrated with his owne blood that we by the same blood might be sanctified and consecrated after a better manner then Aaron was by the blood of the Ramme of Consecration The morall implyed in sprinkling of Aaron's right eare the thumbe of his right hand and the great toe of his right foot is this Our eares which are the sense of discipline and the gate by which faith entreth into our hearts must be consecrated and hallowed by the blood of our high Priest that wee may know God's will our hands and feet likewise which are the instruments of service are hallowed and sanctified by his blood that we may walke in his wayes and doe his will Finally as both our bodyes and soules have beene redeemed by his blood so both must be consecrated in it and enabled by it unto his service 7 Another ceremony or service at Aaron's Consecration was the offering up of one loaf of bread one cake of oyled bread and one wafer wherewith Aaron's and his sonnes hands were first to be filled and afterwards to be burnt upon the Altar for a burnt offering for a sweet savour unto the Lord. Exod. 29. ver 23. 25. The mystery signified by this and the other bloody sacrifice may best be gathered from that which hath afore been said concerning the circumcision of Isaack and of Abraham's seed or concerning God's demanding Isaac for a burnt offering which was then observed out of Rupertus an ancient Writer God did demand at Abraham's hands that he might thereby tye himselfe to give his own sonne unto Abraham and his seed To which may now be added the testimony of S. Chrysostome in his comments upon our Saviours words to the Woman of Samarin Da mihi bibore give mee to drink The Fountaine of life sitting besides the Fountaine calls for drink not that he was desirous to take but rather to give drink Give me to drink saith he that I may make thee drink the water of immortality I thirst after the salvation of mens soules not that I might drink but that I may give them salvation to drink I imitate my Father who said to Abraham offer me up thy Sonne thy only Sonne Isaac whom thou lovest for a burnt offering this he said not as if he had desired to accept Abraham's sonne but that he determined to give his owne Sonne for the sinnes of the world as S. Iohn saith Chap. 3. ver 16. In like manner God required the flesh and blood of Bullocks and of Rammes with unleavened bread to be offered up in sacrifice unto him at the Consecration of Aaron not that he stood in need to eate the flesh of Bulls or bread of wheat or drink the blood of Rammes but that he then purposed to consecrate for us and to give unto us his only Sonne whose flesh is meat indeed whose blood is drink indeed whose body is the bread of life which commeth downe from heaven which who so eateth shall live for ever for he that truly eateth is consecrated by it to be a King and Priest for ever unto God the Father CHAP. 28. A briefe Recapitulation of what hath been said in this parallel between the Consecration of Aaron and the Consecration of the Sonne of God the conclusion of the whole Treatise concerning it TO recapitulate what hath been said before The beginning of the everlasting Priesthood according to the order of Melchisedch is the determining of the Aaronicall Priesthood unlesse we shall say as perhaps we ought that this Priesthood with the legall rites and sacrifices did expire with the last mortall breath of him who is now immortall 2 The everlasting sacrifice whereby he is consecrated an everlasting Priest was then accomplished and the cessation of the Aaronicall Priesthood proclaimed when hee said consummatum est and commended his spirit unto God Yet is it not probable that his Consecration or the Consecration of the everlasting Sanctuary were at the same instant accomplished His sacred soule perfumed with the fresh odour and fragrancy of his sweet smelling sacrifice annointed with his most precious blood into whatsoever other place it afterwards went instantly repaired into the Holiest of Holies into Paradise it selfe This is the accomplishment of our Attonement prefigured by the high Priest's entring into the holy place with blood and the period of all sacrifices for his owne or our Consecration 3 That the vale through which the high Priest after the order of Aaron did enter into the most holy place should rend asunder at the very instant wherein the soule and spirit of this our high Priest did passe through the vale of his flesh rent and torne into his coelestiall Sanctuary was a lively embleme to all observant spectators that hee was no intruder but called by God And reason they had to observe this signe or accident in that hee had promised to one of them that were crucified with him Hedie mecum erit in Paradiso 4 The publike solemnitie of Consecration hath ever been a speciall testimony or adjunct of lawfull calling and Christ's Consecration was more solemne and publique then Aaron's was Such it was as flesh and blood could not affect such as nothing but filiall obedience to his heavenly Father could have moved this our high Priest to admit because it was to be accomplished by a lingring and a bloody death Moses at the Consecration of Aaron is commanded to gather all the congregation together unto the doore of the tabernacle Levit. 8. Ad tria voluit Dominus populum congregart Primum ut pro eo sacerdos offerret eumque expearet Secundum ad instituendum sacerdotem ut sciret populus Aaron filios ejus praefici sibi in sacerdotes mediatores de caeterâ— commendavit se illi Tertione esset inter eos aliquis qui postea sacerdotium ambiret postquam omnes sciebant Aarâ—nem à Deo sacerdotem institutum Oleaster 5 For the like reasons God would have the Consecration of his Son accomplished at the Passeover that is as a Father speakes at the Metropolis of Iewish feasts the most solemne publique and universall meeâ—ing that any one People or Nation in
the world ever had besides the concurse and confluence of strangers at the time of our Saviour's Passion The manner of whose death and the signes and wonders then exhibited made the heathen Centurion a man altogether ignorant of these sacred mysteries to confesse that this Iesus whom he had seene crucified was the Sonne of God But the time the manner and consequence of his Resurrection most directly proves as well his Priesthood as his calling to it to have been from God both more excellent then Aaron's was 6 Wee see it experienced Numb 16. 17. that notwithstanding the publique solemnitie of Aaron's Consecration by Moses there wanted not such rebellious spirits then as the world is full of now which thought themselves altogether as holy and as â—it to be high Priests as he After the earth had swallowed up the principals in this conspiracy the â—eaâ—â—â—eâ—â—e multitude though â—eâ—â—â—â—ed for a while with the fearefull disaster of their ring-leaders conspire aâ—â—esh against Moses and Aaron and had utterly perished in this rebellion had not Aaron runne into the midst of the congregation which sought his life and stood with his center as with a shield of defence betwixt them and death But seeing neither the fearefull examples shewed upon Coreh Dathan and Abiram nor Aaron's late compassion towards them when wrath was gone out from the Lord against them and the plague was kindled amongst them were able to quell their jealousies or appease their murmurings the Lord lastly made the Rodde of Levy alone inscribed with Aarons name amongst all the roddes of the Tribes of Israel to bring forth branch leafe blossome and fruit in one night and thus beautified with flowre and fruit which were not to fade in so many yeares as they had been houres inspringing to be laid up in the Arke of the testimony to stay the murmurings of the children of Israel and to be as a witnesse against them whensoever they should question Aaron's calling 7 The Tribes of Israel were never so maliciously and stubbornly bent against Moses and Aaron as the Tribe of Levi and Aaron's successors with their complices were against the sonne of David to whom the Lord destinated the Priesthood after the order of Melchisedech by solemn oath Though the earth did quake and the rocks rent in sunder though the graves did open and give up their dead more desirous to swallow up these rebellious miscreants quick then to swallow up Coreh Dathan and Abiram as doubtlesse they had done unlesse this Priest of the most high God had made an Attonement for them saying Father forgive them for they know not what they doe yet their murmurings cease not with his life their malice pursues him into his grave 8 The last and peremptory signe reserved by the wisdome of God either to stay their murmurings or to condemne them with Coreh with Dathan and Abiram unto the everlasting pit was the causing of this Rodde of â—esse this branch of David whom these cruell and mercilesse men had quite stript of flower of leafe of branch bereft of sappe and as it were scorcht and beaked in the fire of affliction to recover sappe and leafe and flower againe to bring forth the fruit which never shall â—â—de now consecrated to be the tree of life to all the Nations enthronized in the heavenly tabernacle and planted at the right hand of God untill his enemies by the rodde of his power be made his footstoole We have seene in part how fitly that testimony of the Psalmist Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee beeing understood of Christ raised from the dead is avouched by our Apostle to prove Christs calling his Consecration and advancement to the Priesthood here mentioned to have been from God and from the event answering to the Psalmist's prophecy and from that other testimony of Psalme 110. often mentioned doth S. Peter cause the murmuring of the people of Israel to cease For from the two premises Act. 2. ver 36. he thus concludes Therefore let all the house of Israell know assuredly that God hath made the same Iesus whom yee have crucified both Lord and Christ that is as much as if he had said both King and Priest by these declarations he gained three thousand soules which otherwise had perished in their murmurings 9 So then the day of his Resurrection is the day wherein the dignity of everlasting Priesthood is actually collated upon him and as he himselfe testifieth All power is given unto mee both in heaven and earth And if all power then as well the power of Priesthood as the power royall And as high Priest he gives Commission to his Disciples to teach and baptize The day of his Ascension or placing at the right hand of God is the day of his solemne enthronization and immediately upon this hee sent forth the Rodde of his strength out of Sion For by this rodde fore-told by the Psalmist Psal 110. we are to understand that power wherewith his Disciples were to be endued from above which they were to expect in Ierusalem at the feast of Pentecost The effusion of the holy spirit and emplanting the Law of the Gospell in their hearts upon that day or the day following wherein the Law of Moses was proclaimed was as a proclamation to all the world that the Priesthood was translated or changed by this manifest translation or change of the Law SICT. 5. Of the Resurraction of the Sonne of God By what Prophets it was fore-told By what Persons or legall Rites it was fore-pictured or fore-shadowed CHAP. 29 In what high esteeme S. Paul did hold the Article of our Saviour's Resurrection and Ascension c. That the want of explicite beliefe to this grand Article of the Resurrection did argue rather a dulnesse or slownesse to believe the Scriptures then any infidelity or incredulity even in such as had seene his miracles and had heard him fore-tell his death and rising againe untill the event did manifest unto them the truth of his former Doctrine and predictions WHen the Doctor of the Gentiles saith He esteemed to know nothing amongst the great Masters of knowledge save Iesus Christ and him crucified this exception no way excludes the knowledge of his Resurrection from the dead or implies that he had not the knowledge of the Article in equall esteeme with the knowledge of his Crosse How highly soever he did esteeme both mysteries it doth not argue that hee did rate the knowledge of his Ascention into heaven his session at the right hand of God or his comming thence to judge the quick and the dead one mite lower The greatest blessing which hee could either praise God for or pray unto him for whether for himselfe or for his beloved Ephesians was the knowledge as he termes it of these grand mysteries Wherefore I also after I had heard of your faith in the Lord Iesus and love unto all the Saints cease not to give thankes for you making mention of you
him a name which is above every name that at the name of Iesus every knee should bow of things in heaven and things in earth and things under the earth and that every tongue should confesse that Iesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father Philip. 2. verses 9. 10. 11. Let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God hath made that same Iesus whom yee have crucified both Lord and Christ Act. 2. 36. CHAP. 31. Shewing the concludency of the allegations used by the Apostles S. Peter and S. Paul to prove the truth of Christ's Resurrection and in particular of the Testimony Psal 2. Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee NOt to repeat other Types or propheticall testimonies of Christ's entrance into immortall glory by the sufferings of death of which the Reader may find plenty as well in Postillers as Commentators nor to dilate upon such generall testimonies whether meerly typical or propheticall or typically propheticall as have been heretofore handled in the seventh and eighth Booke of these Comments upon the Creed as that of Psal 82. c. I make no question but those testimonies out of the Psalmes or Prophets which are avouch'd to this purpose by the Apostles themselves specially by S. Peter and S. Paul were expounded by our Saviour himselfe unto the two fore-mentioned Disciples which did accompany him unto Emmaus 2 Now the testimonies most insisted upon by the Apostles as well for convincing the Gentiles as the Iewes are specially three that of Psal the 2. Thou art my Sonne this day have I begotten thee and Psal the 6. Thou wilt not leave my soule in hell nor suffer thine holy one to see corruption the third The Lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedech or which is much what the same The Lord said unto my Lord sit thou at my right hand untill I make thine enemies thy footstoole The extraordinary successe of all these allegations abundantly testifies that they were most concludent for many thousand soules at two severall times besides others were converted by them The testimony out of Psal 2. is prest home by S. Peter Act. 2. v. 6. to the 37. to the Iewes specially and by S. Paul both upon Iews and Gentiles Act. 13. Though with better successe upon the Gentiles The force and strength of this testimonie and likewise how farre it was meant of David and fulfilled in Christ hath been at large discust before The point at which these present endeavours aime is to declare how these two testimonies 1. Thou art my Sonne this day have I begotten thee and 2. Thou art a Priest after the order of Melchisedech doe concludently and irrefragably inferre the Resurrection of Christ that Iesus whom the Iewes had crucified being both the Sonne of God and sonne of David and his Consecration to his everlasting Priesthood for unto this later point both testimonies are drawne by our Apostle Heb. 5. v. 5. and 6. But how close they reach this point whether jointly or severally is not so cleerly set forth by most interpreters as that the Reader unlesse his understanding farre surpasse mine will easily collect The generall meaning of our Apostle hath been declared in the first Section and in the close of the fourth of this Booke it is punctually thus Seeing Aaron's calling to the dignity of Priesthood was publiquely manifested to be from God no man after might take upon him to erect a new Priesthood no not to the temporall prejudice of Aaron and his successors much lesse to abolish this Priesthood which God had erected unlesse he could manifest to man and Angels that his Commission for thus doing was immediately from God and authentique being sealed by oath and solemnely executed And seeing no man might therefore Christ though God and man did not glorifie himselfe as the Apostle addes to be made an high Priest but he that said unto him Thou art my Sonne this day have I begotten thee did put this dignity upon him Many Interpreters have stretcht their wits to make the literall sense of this Psalmist's words reach home to our Apostle's purpose Others so slight it as if they would give us to understand or cause to suspect our Apostle himselfe did not much stand upon it but only passe by it unto the second testimony Thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedech Albeit in my opinion the later testimony proves his fiat or Commission the former his ordination or execution of his Commission I will not wrong the judicious Reader 's patience with profering variety of such expositors unto his choise as his wisdome cannot approve Cajetan hath Ribera's approbation and of all the expositors which went before him drawes the Psalmist's Oracle Thou art my Sonne this day have I begotten thee neerest to the point in question So farre I am from carping at any thing which those two expositors have said to the point now in question that I will endeavour to explicate and extend their meaning in the best sort I can The Priesthood saith Cajetan as Ribera expounds him before the Law given was annexed as a prerogative to the first borne and descended from Abraham to Isaac and by speciall dispensation to Iacob Now the whole dignity of the first borne being lost by Ruben was divided amongst three of his Brethren The Soveraignty or Principallity fell to Iudah the Priesthood to Levi and the double Portion to Ephraim And in Aaron the sonne of Levi was the Priesthood established long before the Kingdome was established in David the sonne of Iudah and to the Priesthood so established David's sons had as litle right as Aaron's sonnes had to the Crowne or Diadem God's peremptory decree for thus dividing these two prerogatives Azariah is not afraid to plead unto King Vzziah's face Chron. 2. 26. And his speech did take impression for hee had no sooner made an end of speaking but the leprosie begunne to appeare in King Vzziah's face and for his usurpation of the Priest's office and intrusion into the house of God he is utterly excluded from his pallace and enforced to resigne the government unto his Sonne But inasmuch as he of whom the Psalmist speakes is solemnely registred and by him declared to be the first borne and Sonne of God it is not lawfull only but expedient but very necessary that all the branches of the first borne's prerogative which Ruben had scattered should be reunited in his Person Againe in that he is the promised seed hee is the compleat heire of all the blessings bequeathed to Abraham and out of whatsoever tribe this promised seed was to spring the honour of Priesthood was as due unto him as the Kingdome Levi and Aaron were but as foefes in trust for conveying the Priesthood as Iudah and David were for making over the Kingdome unto him 3 All those suppositions and others perhaps more then Cajetan or Ribera though
A TREATISE OF THE CONSECRATION OF THE SONNE OF God to his everlasting PRIESTHOOD AND THE ACCOMPLISHMENT of it by his glorious Resurrection and Ascention BEING THE NINTH BOOK of Commentaries upon the Apostles CREED CONTINVED BY THOMAS IACKSON Doctor in Divinity Chaplaine in ordinary to his MAIESTY and President of C. C. C. in OXFORD OXFORD Printed by LEONARD LICHFIELD printer to the Famous Vniversity AN. DOM. 1638. TO THE ROYALL Ma tie OF OVR MOST GRACIOVS AND PIOVS SOVERAIGNE CHARLES KING OF GREAT BRITAINE c. Most gracious Soveraigne THE only ends or scopes at which my desires in the first draught of this long worke of comments upō the Apostles Creed did ayme were first and principally the glory of God which is the supreme Cause of causes the maine End of all other ends intended by good men or Angels The second subordinate to this was to give satisfaction to my longing desires of discharging my duty to the Church my Mother by doing her such service as I was able in setting forth the true worship of God and in maintaining the faith professed by her The third subordinate to the second but principally to the first was to give an accompt unto my middle age how I had spent my youth and to leave a Constat unto my old age at which by Gods good providence beyond my hope or expectation I am now arrived that I had not altogether spent my best daies in a drowsie sleepe or which is worse in waking dreames or wandring projects after pleasure riches ambitious hopes or private ends But being first called unto Your Majesties service in my declining yeares I tooke the boldnesse upon me about some five yeares agoe in supplement of my weake performances in my Ordinary attendance to dedicate these three Bookes concerning the knowledge of Iesus Christ of him crucified unto Your Highnesse these being to mine owne apprehension the best fruites of my best and flourishing yeares The matter or subject of them will not I take it be denied by any to be the fittest Theme for the meditations of all good Christians according to their severall capacities And no subject under heaven can be either more profitable or more delightfull for contemplative or stronger wits to worke upon unto whom especially unto such of them as have better meanes or abilities then God hitherto hath blessed me withall I leave to amend or finish what I have long agoe begun thus far prosecuted Ful time it is for me but no time I hope as yet overpast to consecrate the rest of my labours unto death-bed-learning and devotions which is the best service that can be expected from me at these yeares and which the elder I grow the better able I trust I shall be to performe as having by long experience found my selfe to bee then the strongest in this kinde of exercise of minde and spirit when I am in greatest weakenesse of body Now of these my devotions and daily prayers unto God a great part must be consecrated to this end that he would vouchsafe to continue his gracious favours and mercies towards your Royall person and that the Crownes of these Kingdomes whereof you are next and immediatly under him and his Christ the supreame Lord and governour may long flourish upon your own head the heads of your Posteritie that after this life ended he may invest you with a Crowne of endlesse glory Your Ma ties most humbly devoted Servant and Chaplaine THOMAS IACKSON To the Christian Reader IT was in my thoughts when this Coppy of my meditations upon the consecratiō of the Son of God to his everlasting Priest-hood was first licenced for the Presse to have annexed unto it one or two Sermons or short Treatises of the like argument But being called from my studies by urgent occasions before the impression of this 9 th Book of Commentaries upon the Creed was neare finished I am constrained to publish it in a lesser volume then I first intended it though I take it in as many lines or more words then either of the two former Bookes upon the same argument to wit the knowledge of Christ and of him crucified doe containe The matter is not great and so much the lesse because I have ready in adversariis divers Sermons or short Treatises as appendices or appertinences to all these three Books respectively to another intitled Christs answer to Iohns disciples or an Introduction to the knowledge of Christ c. to be published as soone as God shall be pleased to grant me ability and opportunity Other three Bookes I have in like readinesse for the Presse to wit the 10 th Book of Comments upon the Creede or a treatise of the naturall mans servitude to sinne and of that poore remnant of Free-will which is left in the Sonnes of Adam before they be regenerated in Christ by the spirit together with directions for the right use or imployment of Free-will after our Baptisme for the accomplishment or rather for performance of the conditions on our parts required that mortification may be accomplished in us by the spirit of God The next of the three Bookes promised is the 11 th Booke of these Commentaries containing a treatise upon the Articles of Christs comming to judgement of the Resurrection of the dead of the Life everlasting which is the finall setence which at his comming to Iudgement shall passe upon all men as well upon them which have bin long dead as those that shall be found alive at his comming The last Booke of these Comments containes the second part of a treatise heretofore begun and in part published concerning the Articles of the holy Catholique Church of the Communion of Saints and the Forgivenesse of sinnes What I here promise or may occasion the Readers especially young students in divinity to expect shall by Gods assistance be shortly or in good time performed either by myselfe or by my Executors unto whose disposalls I am not likely to leave much scarce any thing else besides Books and Papers Thine ever in Christ Iesu THOMAS IACKSON A TABLE OF THE PRINCIPALL Arguments of the severall Sections and Chapters contained in this BOOKE SECTION I. OF Consecration and of the Qualifications of those that were to be consecrated high Priests CHAP. 1. Of the true value or signification of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or of being made perfect Pag. 3. 2. Of the separation of the high Priest from men and of the compassionate temper which was the speciall Qualification of every high Priest Heb. 5. v. 2. Pag. 7. 3. What were those strong cryes which the Sonne of God did utter in the dayes of his flesh how farre his prayers were heard and from what death and danger he was delivered Heb. 5. v. 7. Pag. 11. 4. The Consecration of the Sonne of God was not finisht immediately after his Agony in the Garden nor was he then or at the time of his sufferings upon the Cross◠an 〈…〉 or
esse or accomplishment of it It was not terminated till the day of his Resurrection from the dead But of this argument more at large Sect. 5. in the Article of the Resurrection of the Son of God That this eternall Son of God was not actually consecrated or made an high Priest untill his Resurrection from the dead our Apostle in the fift verse of this Chapter before cited to another purpose fully instructs us Christ tooke not to himselfe this honour to be made the high Priest but hee that said unto him Thou art my Sonne this day have I begotten thee put it upon him And this day or this Ego hodiè genuite as this our Apostle elswhere instructs us referres unto the day of his Resurrection or begetting from the dead After which day death hath no more dominion over him but Hee such an absolute power over death and the powers of darknesse that neither can annoy or assault him And from this day and not before doth his endlesse everlasting Priesthood commence And being thus actually consecrated by his Resurrection from the dead that is made both Lord and Christ hee is become the Author of everlasting salvation which was the second Point CHAP. 5. That the Sonne of God by his Consecration being once accomplished became the Author and Fountaine of everlasting salvation to all such and only such as obey him In what sence he is said to have dyed for all men or to be the redeemer of all mankind Hee became Author of Salvation to all that obey him THe signification of the single termes in this proposition is so plaine that it needs no paraphrase or explication and the connexion of them so firme as requires no distinction All the difficultie is about the limitation of the entire proposition it selfe as whether he be the Author or cause of everlasting salvation only to them which obey him or unto all to the end that they may obey him or whether this proposition be equivalent and but equivalent unto this proposition whosoever beleeveth in him shall be saved or a restraint of it Surely if in all these places of the old and new Testament wherein salvation is ascribed to faith or unto faith alone the Apostles or Prophets had substituted obedience instead of faith there could have beene no dangerous misnomure for as the faith is such is the obedience and è contra Both terms equally imply two the same things necessary to salvation First a submission of our wills to Gods will or a readinesse to doe his will revealed Secondly when wee have done as well as wee can to deny our selves and renounce all confidence in our best workes whether of faith or obedience But however the termes be fully equivalent yet the word obedience better befits this place then if he had said He became the Author of everlasting salvation to all that beleeve in him because obedience is the very formall effect of true faith or beliefe as they are set upō this particular truth or mystery here taught by our Apostle the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or impression or the ingrossment of the patterne here commended to our imitation For if we syncerely and stedfastly believe that the Son of God became obedient to his Father even unto the death of the Crosse that for our sakes he was consecrated through grievous afflictions through unknowne paines and terrors to the end he might be our faithful and compassionate high Priest This Doctrine it selfe being laid to our hearts will bring forth the like affection or obedience towards him specially if our faith be seconded by hope of being consecrated through obedience to be Kings and Priests with him unto our God which is the full paraphrase of our everlasting salvation here meant the true expression of that perfection mentioned by our Apostle Heb. 11. v. the last But if the Apostles punctuall meaning be that the Sonne of God is the Author of everlasting salvation only to such as obey him shall we not hence be concluded to grant that hee died only for such as finally shall be saved or that he redeemed none but the Elect because the Author of salvation to none but these Thus many in our dayes and which is more to be lamented some of this Church of England have from the former premisses collected and peremptorily taught that Christ dyed for none but the Elect without vouchsafing any mannerly answer to the Church their Mother who expressely maintaines the contradictony as that he dyed for all men that he redeemed not only every one of us in particular but all mankind Others have been so courteous as to vouchsafe their Mother and Bretheren some distinctions or limitations of that universall assertion as thus That he died for all sufficientèr not efficientèr sufficiently not efficiently for all that he redeemed all mankind with this limitation that is singula generum some o◠all mankind some rich some poore some Iewes some Gentiles The later distinction is very dangerous the former impertinently unnecessary for if by all mankind we once come to understand some of all sorts of men we shall commit no new error but only extend the same if by the whole world which God the Father is said to have created wee understand only some portion of every principall part of this universe as some portion of the heavens some of the starres some part of the earth some of the water some part of theayre some of every sort of vegetable or living things but not absolutely all The other distiction of sufficientèr and efficientèr falls under the common error of most moderne Catechists or Divines which is to take upon them to divide things which in their nature are indivisible as the Will of God the Death of Christ or the Value of his sufferings to leave other termes which import matter divisible undistinguished Such is the terme or word Redemption passively taken not as it is an act of God or as it in his prescience For however the will of God or the value of Christs sufferings be altogether indivisible because absolutely infinite yet of Redemption purchased for us by Christs bloody death and passion there are as you please to call them severall parts or degrees Now that may be absolutely true of some one or more parts of degrees which is not true of all The first degree of our Redemption purchased by Christ was the payment of the ransome for our sinnes unto his Father and our freedome from slavery by his conquest over Satan This part or these degrees of Redemption are alike common to all mankind Christ whether in his death upon the Crosse or in his conflict with the powers of darknesse in the Garden did suffer asmuch for any one as for all God was in him reconciling all men unto himselfe All were set free de iure from Satans servitude The second part or degree of Redemption is our actuall admission into the Catholique Church or which is all one our
mother are but branches of that generall negative without genealogie Now whether we consider him as God or as man he cannot without wrong to the sacred character or sense of the holy spirit be thought or said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without genealogy as Melchisedech is for one generation or descent makes a genealogie Otherwise Cain and Abel should have beene 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without genealogie which titles notwithstanding cannot in the Evangelists meaning be applyed unto Adam for he derives all others genealogies from Adam's and Adam's from God Luk. 3. Now looke in what sense Abel Cain or Adam may be said to have a genealogie Christ may in the same sense have two One as he is the Sonne of God another as he is the Sonne of Abraham David and of Marie But so it is that even the wisest and most judicious Writers of times swallow such fallacies in historicall narrations or discourses of matters spirituall especially without any sensible disgust or dislike as would be rejected no lesse then poison unallayed were they exhibited to them in the simplicitie of language or logistick forme To instance in an notorious one much like unto this late mentioned 7 The most ancient Editions of Macrobius mention a jest of Augustus broken upon Herod for killing his Sonne at the same time that he butchered the Hebrew Infants Mallem Herodis esse percum quam filium Some ancient Christians to salve the truth of this narratioÌ„ being somewhat suspicious because Herod at that time had no knowne Sonne that was a child have made the old Tyrant father of a young sonne supposed to be borne unto him by a second wife of Iewish if not of Davids progenie which the age wherein hee lived never laid unto his charge Some later criticks better able to disprove this supposititious broode then apt to reforme that error in themselves which unreform'd in others did beget it have not spared to charge their Bretheren in time their fathers with falsification of Macrobius his Text as if the forecited passage had been inserted by some ancient Christians as many verses in Sibylla's oracles have beene unlesse these and the like Aristarchusses faile in their criticismes But for Macrobius his text it is without question uncorrupt and the Christian Fathers free from that falsification of it whereof late Criticks have accused them The zeale of the ancient Fathers and the censorious sawcinesse of later Criticks did alike overreach their judgments But this as I said is a fault common to us and to those that are farre our betters We maintaine our owne posittions as if wee were waking Wee peruse good Authors as if wee had never lookt upon them but in a slumber yet what punie Logician but would scorne to swallow this fallacy in a dreame Chaerilus fuit vir bonus Chaerilus fuit poeta ergo Chaerilus fuit bonus poeta Chaerilus was a good man and a Poet therefore a good Poet. The forementioned criticall collection is in regard of its forme a like false and disjointed only the matter of it is not so vulgar or palpable The roote of the Criticks erronious censure was this Herod killed the Syrian or Hebrew Infants amongst these Infants hee killed his owne son ergo this sonne of Herod when hee killed him was an Infant That Herod about the same time wherein the fants of Iudah and Bethleem were by his appointment slaine did out of his jealous feare command Antipater his turbulent sonne to be put to death no modern Critick shall be ever able to disprove That the killing of his owne sonne being come to maturity of age with these Infants doth better sort with the analogy of Gods Iustice usually manifested in the infatuation of Politicians and with the literall sense and character of Augustus iest taking it as Macrobius hath expressed it then if hee had slaine the same party in his Infancy shall elswhere by Gods assistance be declared 8 The fallacy for whose discovery these two former have beene produced is in my opinion of all three the most grosse the best forme that can be put upon it is this Melchisedech was without father or mother Melchisedech is like unto the Sonne of God ergo Melchisedech is herein like unto the Sonne of God in that he is without father or mother The premisses are most true but the conclusion if I may so speake more then most false for of all the persons that are or have beene in heaven or earth none are so unlike as the Sonne of God and Melchisedech if wee state the comparison betwixt them according to the naturall tenor or importance of these termes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What shall we say then that these titles expressely given to Melchisedech by our Apostle are altogether superfluous needlesse or impertinent to the conclusion intended by him Rather most necessary and most apposite As how Briefly thus This descripâ—tion of him by these titles is a condition or Qualification necessarily supposed or pre-required to the similitude intended betwixt Christ and him It is no proper part or formall terme of the similitude it self That formally consists only in being without beginning or end of dayes and herein they are as like one another as any body and its proper shadow can be 9 Every man that hath a father even AdaÌ„ himself who was without father or mother had a beginning of dayes Every man that hath a Son to succeed him as like wise supposed to have an end of daies Whence it is that no King of Iudah or Israel not Solomon himselfe in all his glory could be any true modell of the Son of God in respect of his eternitie No Priest or Son of Levi not Eleazar Phinehas or Aaron himself though pictured in their pontificall ornaments could beare any colour or resemblance of his everlasting Priesthood For all these are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their Parents their Sonnes and Successors are exactly registred in the sacred Volume the same Page or Table which expresseth their genealogie doth represent withall their mortalitie that they had a beginning or end of dayes And whosoever hath a beginning or end of dayes can be no true shadow of eternitie or of the Sonne of God as he is eternall CHAP. 8. That the omission of Melchisedech's Genealogie did import a speciall mystery and what that mystery was MAy we hence averre that every man mentioned in Scripture whose birth whose death or genealogie is not expressed may be a true shadow or picture of the Sonne God as he is eternall Wee doe not wee need not say so The day is oftimes mentioned in the Scripture without any mention of the night Yet to seeke after a mysticall sense in all such places were to set our wits a wandring in a waking dream But seeing in the Story of the worlds creation wee find such accurate and constant mention of the evening and morning making one day untill all the works of the sixe daies were
that obey him And is called of God from the time of his Resurrestion or exaltation an high Priest after the order of Melchisedech CHAP. 10. Wherein the Priesthood of Melchisedech did differ from the Priesthood of Aaron That Melchisedech did not offer any sacrifice of bread and wine unto God when he blessed Abraham THe office of Aaron and of his Sonnes wee have described Deuteron 10. 8. At that time the Lord separated the Tribe of Levi to beare the Arke of the Covenant of the Lord to stand before the Lord to minister unto him and to blesse in his name unto this day And againe Deut. 18. 3. This shall be the Priests duty c. For the Lord thy God hath chosen him out of all thy Tribes to stand and minister in the name of the Lord him and his Sonnes for ever ver 5. Could Melchisedech's office be greater or his patent ampler especially for duration For sacrifice prayer and blessing are the trinall dimensions of the Priesthood howsoever taken This difficultie perhaps did occasion a foule error in the Romish Church or encourage her followers to maintaine this error brought forth it may be upon other occasions to wit that the office of Melchisedech should properly consist herein especially differ from the Priesthood of AaroÌ„ For that when he met Abraham he offered up bread wine by way of proper sacrifice unto God as a type or pledge of the unbloody sacrifice of the masse unto which the Romanists for the most part restraine the exercise of Christ's Priesthood after the order of Melchisedech 2 To omit their chymicall conceits who labour in vaine to extract some act of sacrificing out of the originall word hotsi Maldonate the most zealous and laborious pleader in this argument because Calvin had held the monkish allegorizars to the literall and gramaticall sense of Scriptures holds it no sin to put a trick of Grammar so they would admit it upon Calvin's followers upon the very text it self For whereas the Romish Interpreters who went before him admit the vulgar edition Et erat Sacerdos Dei altissimi This Critick to despite Calvin will correct Magnificat and renders it thus Et erat sacrificans Deo altissimo His reason for this innovation is because the hebrew Cohen is for it's form a participle of the present tense but surely he was better read in his Gramar then in his Lexicon although better read in that then in the Hebrew Text for although the Hebbrew Cohen be usually taken for a Priest yet to sacrifice is no part of the proper formal signification of the radicall verb Cahan That directly imports no more then ministravit or Sacerdotem egit Whence though it be most true that every Sacrificer is a CoheÌ„ is a Priest or Minister of God yet is not this truth simply convertible that is Every Cohen Priest or Minister of God is a Sacrificer specially if we speak of times before the Law was given or since it expired much lesse will it follow that every act or function which the Minister of God performs should be a sacrifice So that albeit we should give the Criticall Iesuit leave to degrade the Hebrew Cohen and turne it out of a noun in which form and habit it was taken by all his Predecessors into the nature and value of a Participle the Grammaticall sense will amount to no more then this Et erat Ministrans or Sacerdotio fungens Deo altissimo and all this Melchisedech might doe and this he verily did in blessing Abraham not in bringing forth or offering bread and wine The letter of the Text runnes thus And Melchisedech King of Salem brought forth bread and wine and hee was a Priest of the most high God Suppose a man should here interrupt the Reader or relater of this History thus What if hee were a Priest of the most high God To what purpose is this clause inserted The holy Ghost in the next words clears the doubt or rather prevents the Question And he blessed Abraham In what forme or sort Blessed be Abraham of the most high God! So then Melchisedech is instiled a Priest of the most high God to shew his warrant to blesse in the name of the most high God And for this interpretation I have the warrant or confirmation from Cyril of Alexandria 3 As for his bread and wine hee offered these to Abraham and not to God as Philo Iudaeus a competent witnesse in this Controversie hath informed us For this good Author opposeth Melchisedech's hospitalitie towards Abraham unto Amalech's niggardly and uncharitable disposition towards Israel comming out of the house of affliction Amalech saith hee was excluded from the congregation of the Lord because hee met not Israel with bread and water whereas Melchisedech had met our father Abraham laden with the spoâ—â—es of his enemies with bread and wine He hath not in my opinion erred much in taking the symboles or elements of bread and wine for emblemes of that true pabulum animae which consists in contemplation of heavenly things And yet I am perswaded hee had no expresse knowledge of the true object of such contemplation to wit the body and blood of Christ or of the benefit conveyed to us from them since they were offered in sacrifice unto God by the elements of bread and wine not as mere signes but as undoubted pledges of his body and blood to be communicated to us 4 And although Suidas in his second Paragraph on the word Melchisedech will have our Saviours Priesthood after the order of Melchisedech to take beginning from the night before his passion wherein he tooke bread and wine and blessed them yet in his third Paragraph upon the same word he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Melchisedech brought forth bread and wine unto Abraham But let us suppose what the Text will not support that Melchisedech did offer up a sacrifice of bread and wine to the most high God thus much being granted wee may draw that net which the Romanist sets for others upon himselfe for our next interrogatory should be this Of what sacrifice may we by any analogie of faith imagine this supposed sacrifice of Melchisedech to be the type of the dayly reiterated sacrifice of the masse or of the one only sacrifice of the Sonne of God Surely if Melchisedech be a true type of the everlasting Priest his sacrifice must be a type of this Priest's everlasting sacrifice Now as we read not though Maldonate's reading of the former pâ—â—â—e were true that Melchisedech did offer any sacrifice besides this supposed sacrifice of bread and wine so wee must undoubtedly beleeve that the Sonne of God did offer no more sacrifices then one and that one never to be reiterated because the value of it being truly infinite the efficacy of it must needs be absolutely everlasting If otherwise wee should with the Romanists admit of a sacrifice by succession or multiplication as everlasting as this transitory
father when Melchisedech met him 3 About the manner how Levi was tithed in Abraham some Questions have been made by the Schoolmen or if haply made by others not so handsomely or happily resolved by them For they draw this point How Levi should be tithed in Abraham unto Physicall or Philosophicall disputes whereas our Apostle argues the case betweene the Priesthood of Aaron and of Melchisedech with such men as were too much addicted unto the Leviticall and Mosaicall law appealing not to the rules of that Law but to the rules of the Civill Morall Law or Law of Nations The extract of our Apostles meaning if I mistake not is this That if Levi Moses or Aaron had beene in full possession of their inheritance unto tithes from their Bretheren at that time when Melchisedech met Abraham Or if Melchisedech had lived in Canaan unto their dayes they ought to have done as their father Abraham did that is to have solemnely acknowledg'd this Melchisedeth to have beene their better by paying the tribute of tithes unto him Our Apostle takes it as unquestionable that Melchisedech was Abraham's better and being either better or a greater man then Abraham was then certainely a greater or better man then Moses or Aaron were then any Sonne of Abraham besides the promised Seed or Messias whom the Iewish Nation expected had beene And of this promised Seed alone Melchisedech for the greatnesse of his person was the only type 4 For albeit Abraham were a Prophet and did exercise the function of a Priest within his owne family or for some others upon speciall occasions albeit some of Abraham's seede were both Kings and Prophets others both Priests and Prophets yet none of them were both Kings and Priests none of them anointed to these two functions Melchisedech though perhaps never solemnely anointed to either function was the only man which was by divine providence or heavenly calling both a true King a Priest of the most high God By both these titles the tithes of all the spoils which Abraha had got by conquest were due nor are any other tithes prediall or personall due to any this day save only to the King or supreme Majestie or to Bishops and Priests within the regions wherein they accrue And for this reason as I coniecture the Danish Nation after they had embraced the Gospell and were become of a heathenish a Christian Commomweale or Kingdome did allot the tithes of their labors or increase of vegetables or profitable living creatures unto their King and to their Bishops excluding then the great Bishop of Rome For when he demanded his portion in them he was rejected by that sharpe and witty answer of Woldmarus Wee have our Kingdome from our subjects our life from our parents our religion from the Church of Rome which if your holinesse redemand we remit it by these presents Whether his meaning was that hee would abandon Christian Religion simply or the Religion of the then Romish Church only rather then forgoe his portion of rithes allotted to him as King I leave it with all Submission to the Searcher of all our hearts and Iudge of all our actions I have no warrant or just presumption out of any history to accuse this King either of Atheisme or irreligion 5 But Melchisedech was both King and Priest a more Soveraigne King then Woldmarus was and a greater high Priest then the Bishop of Rome or any other that have lived on earth besides the Son of God himselfe whose picture of shadoww he was That this Sonne of God or Seede of Abraham which hee assumed should be much greater then Melchisedech King of Salem is implyed in the manner of God's promised blessing unto Abraham being compared with the manner of Melchisedech's blessing Abraham For Abraham was blessed by Melchisedech not in Melchisedech's name but in the name of the most high God whose Priest hee was for he was blessed by him not in him whereas in Abraham's seede all the Nations of the earth Melchisedech as well as Abraham were to be blessed Howbeit this promised seede of Abraham was no greater then Melchisedech in externall beautie or prerogative royall till after his Resurrection or second birth During the time of his humiliation He was rather destinated then consecrated to be the Author or fountaine of blessednesse unto us For as the Apostle argues Heb. 5. 8. Though hee were the Sonne yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered And being consecrated to wit by his sufferings became the Author of eternall salvation unto all that obey him And is called of God from the time of his Resurrection or exalation an high Priest after the order of Melchisedech For from this time and not before his royall Priesthood did commence So he saith to his Disciples immediately after his Resurrection All power is given to mee in heaven and earth power to blesse with the blessings of this life and of the life to come And being now after his Consecration to be enthroniz'd in his Kingdome royall Priesthood he lift up his hands and blessed his Disciples And it came to passe that as he blessed them be departed from them and was carried up into heaven Lu. 24. 50. 51. Yet being there in body he continues with his Church here on earth by continuatiō of his blessings unto the worlds end That this part of his Priestly functiō to wit his Authoritative or Authentique blessing doth follow his Resurrection our Apostle intimates Acts 3. 26. Yee are the children of the Prophets and of the Covenant which God hath made unto our father saying to Abraham Even in thy seede shall all the Nations of the earth be blessed First unto you hath God raised up his Sonne Iesus and him he hath sent to blesse you in turning every one of you from your iniquities And againe Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the Law being made a curse for us that the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles Galat. 3. 14. So that the Iewes were the first but not the only parties interessed in the blesing wherewith God by Melchisedech blessed Abraham For in asmuch as that blessing was the same blessing though further spread and better branched wherewith God by Noah blessed Sem we Gentiles the Sonnes of Iapheth were heires of it in reversion For though Shem be the first Iaphet was in the scond place blessed with his Brother Shem. Gen. 9. 27. God perswade Iaphet that hee may dwell in the tents of Shem and let Canaan be his servant So that Melchisedech doth prefigure Christs Priesthood by his Authority to blesse in Gods name Blessing as it was applyed unto Melchisedech is but a shadow or surface only Abraham indeed was blessed by him but in the name of the most high God But blessing as appliable to Christ is a solid and hath its trinall dimension Wee are blessed for him we are blessed through him wee are blessed by him And which is the
endure for ever and his throne as the Sunne before me It shall be established for ever as the moone and as a faithfull witnesse in heaven 8 The emphasis of the word once in the originall whether Hebrew or Greek is as well expressed by our English Proverb or Apophthegme Once done and aye done that is so well done as it needs no correction no amendment or reiteration Nor doe we read that God after the interposition of this oath first made to Abraham and afterward renewed to David did ever resume the like solemne Oath or make fuller declaration of it untill the seede promised was exhibited This is that which the Psalmist means I have sworn once by my holinesse that I will not fail David The true expression of which phrase is equivalent to that before mentioned upon the 18 vers of the 6 th to the Hebrews And the word in the originall is the very same with that which the Septuagint useth in the translation of this 89. Psalme The true meaning of both places is that not only the promise it self was irreversible but that the blessing promised after it was once exhibited should be exempted from all possibility of expiration or diminution The true reasoÌ„ whereof was because this promise was confirmed by Oath the declaration of his Oath reiterated in this Psalme verses the 36. and 37. being before avouched v. 3. And such reiterations in Scripture are not tautologies â—ut true characters as from the Scripture it hath beene afore observed of the stability of the thing promised or signified 10 The expressions in the beginning of this Psalme and in the close are Indices optimè moratae orationis true characters of pious humilitie and reverent devotion towards God The intermediate passages are full of expostulatorie passions This difference in the character perswades mee that the Psalmist did penne his owne part from the first v. to the 38. and represent the murmurings of male contents from the beginning of that verse unto 52. which is the last Two points more there be which require a further review before we leave this Psalm as first unto what former promises made to David in his life time the oath twice mentioned by the Psalmist doth literally referre Our later English in the margine upon v. the 3. sends the Reader an errand I must confesse not impertinent unto the fore-mentioned place of Samuel 2. Chap. 7. 11. Yet an errand which that place cannot fully dispatch for in that place there is no mention of an Oath Both the places cited out of the 89 Psalme literally referre unto the promise mentioned by Samuel but as it is confirmed by Oath upon record Psalme 132. which it is evident was composed by David himselfe a long time after the promise avouched by Nathan in the 2. Sam. 7. and longer before the 89 Psalme was penned The next querie worthy the judicious Readers consideration is what God's Oath by his holinesse or as the LXX Interpreters have it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in or by my holy one doth directly signify or collaterally import That God swearing by his holinesse did directly and immediately sweare by himselfe is not controversed for the Oath for its substance and essentiall object is the very same with that Oath which he made to Abraham Genesis 22. where it is said by my selfe have I sworne for God's holinesse is himselfe But for the collaterall object of this one and the same Oath I referre the judicious and moderate Reader to Calvin's exposition or resolution of this doubt thus related by Coppen in his ingenuous and learned annotations upon the 36. v. of the 89 Psalme Per sanctitatem id est per meipsum Calvinus putat Deum jurasse per Templum tanquam praesentiae suae symbolum quoddam habitaculum Ita Calvinus in harmonia Evangelistarum v. 17. Ch. 23. Math. Vbi principium hoc ponit figit non esse fas nisi per unius Dei nomen jurare unde sequitur quascunque ad jurandum formulas homines adhibeant uni Deo servandum esse suum honorem unde colligitur quomodo quatenus per Templum jurare liceat videlicet quia sedes est Sanctuarium Dei sicuti per coelum quia illic refulget Dei gloria Deus enim se in talibus praesentiae suae Symbolis in testem Iudicem advocari patitur modo jus suum salvum retineat 11 If this annotation be true and othodoxall that when God did sweare by his holinesse he did by way of attestation call his Temple his holy place to witnesse I should not understand the materiall Temple as then not founded in Ierusalem but that heavenly Sanctuary or most holy place whereinto God's holy one whom he would not suffer to see or feele corruption in the grave was after his Resurrection from the dead to enter and there to remaine as our immortall Mediator and Intercessor For so the Son of God God blessed for ever should be as true and essentiall an object of this oth as the Father himselfe was And this interpretation doth well accord with our Apostles expression or exposition of God's Oath to Abraham 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hee did interpose himselfe or intermediated by Oath 12 If the allegations hitherto mentioned cannot perswade I hope the authoritie and arguments of our Apostle will enforce the ingenuous Chtistian Reader to grant the maine conclusion in this discourse intended The Conclusion is briefly this However God's Promise made without an Oath be in the assertive sence the very same with promises confirmed by Oath yet in the charactericall sence they much differ Meere promises are conditionall and reversible the blessings so promised mutable or determinable by time but God's Oath annexed to his Promises is alway a character of irreversibility and of everlasting immutability after the blessing promised be possessed so farre as it concerns the life to come Two places there are in the seventh Chapter to the Hebrewes very pregnant to this purpose and which doe sufficiently authorize the fore-mentioned prenotion or received rule for interpreting all the former places of Scripture alledged as wee have done For after many forcible reasons to convince his Auditors that there was no such perfection in the Law or legall Priesthood as the Patriarchs and their godly fore-fathers did hope and wait for And that there was a necessity that both the Law and Priesthood should be changed which is the Subject of his discourse from verse the 10 hee pitcheth specially upon this verse And in asmuch as not without an Oath he was made Priest for those Priests were made without an Oath but this with an Oath by him that said unto him The Lord sware and will not repent thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedech by so much was Iesus made a surety of a better Testament Aaron and his sons had the promise were authorized by expresse charter to offer sacrifice and to blesse in
returned safe from Babylon was the type of Christ as King In respect of their deliverance from Babel or safe conduct in the way Zerubbabel had the precedency of Iesus the high Priest as Moses had the precedency of Iesus the sonne of Nun in respect of the peoples deliverance from Egypt But as Iesus the sonne of Nun was God's principall instrument in planting this people in the land of promise so Iesus the high Priest the sonne of Iehosadeck is the principall Saviour of this people after their safe returne from Babel into their native land the principall type or shadow of Iesus Christ our Saviour as he is consecrated by God to be the Author of everlasting salvation Zerubbabel the chiefe Prince of Iudah and Iesus the sonne of Iehosadech the high Priest and for his time the sole successor of Aaron in his office joyne both together the one a lively type of Christ Iesus the sonne of David as he was King the other a lively Type of Christ Iesus as hee was ordained to be our high Priest in the building of the materiall Altar which was to be erected unto the Lord in the City of Ierusalem after their returne from Babylon But whether of these two to wit Zerubbabel the sonne of David or Iesus the sonne of Iehosedech Aaron's successor had precedency in this great worke of erecting the Altar unto God the first worke of difficulty or moment to be undertaken by God's Servants upon their returne unto Ierusalem the City of God were hard to determine by any rule of sacred heraldry Ezra the scribe and sacred historian of this businesse gives Iesus the Sonne of Iehosedeck the precedency in stile Ezra 3. 2. Then stood up leshua the son of Iozadak and his brethren the Priests and Zerubbabel the sonne of Shealtiel and his brethren and builded the Altar of the God of Israel to offer burnt offrings thereon as it is written in the Law of Moses the man of God But in the second of Haggai verse 4. Zerubbabel the sonne of David hath the like precedency of stile Now be strong ô Zerubbabel saith the Lord and be strong ô Ieshua the sonne of Iosedech the high Priest and be strong all yee people of the land saith the Lord and work for I am with you saith the Lord of hoasts 4 Yet that Iesus the Sonne of Iosedech was the more illustrious and principall Type of Iesus Christ our Saviour and Redeemer as he is the builder and founder of God's spirituall Temple Gods holy Catholique Church is most apparent from the prophecies of Zachary a Prophet in those times extraordinarily rais'd up by God to encourage lesus the high Priest and his fellow-Priests to goe forward in building the materiall Temple in Ierusalem specially if we compare Zachary the third and part of Zachary the sixt with the Prophecies of Ieremy Chap. 23. verse 33. To begin with Zachary Chap. 3. Iesus the Sonne of Iosedesk by progeny the sonne of Aaron is solemnly enthronized as deputy or Proxie for the sonne of David the promised and long-expected high Priest after the order of Melchisedech This story or true legend of the installment or enthronization of Iesus the Sonne of Iosedech as in the right and interest of Iesus Christ the Sole Founder and Builder of the holy Catholique Church whereof the visible and materiall Temple of Ierusalem was but a type or shadow is very remarkably set out unto us as in a Map Zach. 3. The whole Chapter as also the 2. Chap. from the 6. verse unto the end is worth our perusall as most pertinent to this argument First Sathan that is the adversary of Iesus the high Priest waxed bold to resist him in the building of the materiall Temple being encouraged thereunto partly because the remnant of ludah then returning from captivity was but as a brand pluck't out of the fire the light whereof in the eyes of Sathan their adversary might easily have been extinguished unlesse the Lord had rebuked Sathan as the Lord there by his Angell doth and his rebuke was an Authentique prohibition Secondly Sathan was the bolder to resist this worke because Iesus the high Priest appointed by God and encouraged by his Prophets for accomplishing of it was for his bodily presence but weake and would quickely have beene daunted by his potent adversary unlesse the Lord by his Angell had rebuked and prohibited him Thus Sathan himselfe in person resisted our Lord and Saviour after his baptisme when hee first begun to lay the foundation of his Church and to erect the Kingdome of God being thereto emboldened by the weaknesse of his bodily presence and appearance in the fashion of man and forme of a servant untill the Lord himselfe rebuked him as the Angell in the name of the Lord did the adversary of of Ieshua saying avoid Sathan for 't is written thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him only shalt thou serve And upon this rebuke Sathan immediately left him and the Angels came and ministred unto him Math. 4. This is the Evangelicall accomplishment of the vision which Zachary saw as in the type or map Zach. 3. v. 1. 2. But here it will bee demanded whether the verses following v. 3. 4. which were literally historically meant of Iesus the Son of Iehosedech can be applied to Iesus our high Priest either according to the literall or mysticall sense Iesus saith the Text was cloathed with filthy garments and stood before the Angel and hee answered and spake unto those that stood before him saying take away the filthy garments from him and unto him he said Behold I have caused thine iniquity to passe from thee and I will cloath thee with change of rayment v. 4. Iesus his outward habit or rayment was sordid and unsightly Qualem decet exulis esse Such as well became a man as yet retainer to the house of mourning not fully absolved from the house of his prison or not yet admitted unto the house of his freedome 5 This Iesus in this habit was a true picture of Iesus our high Priest whilst hee continued in the forme and conditiion of a servant or whilst arraigned before the high Priests or Pontius Pilat and although in this estate he knew no sin yet as the Apostle saith 2. Cor. Chap. 5. v. last He was made sinne for us that we might be made the rigteousnesse of God in him Hee is said to be made sinne for us because hee bare the punishment due to our sinnes And this sinne or iniquity God did truly cause to passe from him because our sinnes were never inherent in him but made his by imputation only The punishment likewise due unto our sinnes did passe from him at his departure out of this world unto his Father The new rayments wherewith Iesus the high Priest was cloathed are emblemes or shadowes of that glory and immortality wherewith Iesus our high Priest since his Resurrection is invested The faire Mitre which was put upon Iesus
the Sonne of Iehozadeck's head was the modell of the Crowne of David which was to flourish upon Iesus the Sonne of David's head as it is Psalme 132. v. 18. But upon himselfe shall his Crowne flourish 6 Briefly the protestation which the Angell in the verses following makes to Iesus the Son of Iosedech is but a renewing or repetition of the promise which God had made unto Abraham and David concerning their seede The tenour of God's promise here renewed or repeated unto Iesus the high Priest is the same And the Angell of the Lord protested unto Ieshua saying thus saith the Lord of boasts if thou wilt walke in my wayes and if thou wilt keepe my charge then thou shalt also judge my house and shalt also keepe my Courts and I will give thee places to walk among these that stand by These words containe as ample a patent for the temporall or legall Priesthood unto Iesus the Sonne of Iosedech and his posteritie as David had for continuation of the temporall Kingdome in his race or progeny both the promises and patents were conditionall But that there should arise an everlasting Priest as well as an everlasting King one in whom God's promises should not be conditionall but yea and amen that is absolute and irrefragable the Prophet Zachary addes Heare now O Ieshua the high Priest thou and thy fellowes that sit before thee for they are what are they monstrous persons saith our former English or men wondred at saith the later Viri portendentes saith the vulgar The Prophets meaning is that they are men set for types or signes of great matters to come The word in the originall is the same Ezech. 12. 11. Say I am your signe like as I have done so shall it be done unto them that is to the Princes of Ierusalem and house of Israel they shall remove and goe into captivity As Ezechiel his digging through the wall in the peoples sight and carrying forth his stuffe upon his shoulders in twilight with his face covered that hee should not see the ground was a signe or prognostication of Zedechiah's stealth or flight from the Chaldeans army which besieged him So Ieshua the high Priest and all his fellowes in all this action or solemnity specially in laying the foundation of the Altar and Temple were prognosticke signes or prefigurations of Iesus the everlasting high Priest and of the spirituall Temple the holy Catholique Church which he was to build by the ministry of the Apostles So it followeth for behold I will bring forth my servant the branch For behold the stone that I have laid before Ieshua upon one stone shall be seven eyes behold I will engrave the graving thereof saith the Lord of hoasts and I will remove the iniquity of that land in one day CHAP. 22. Of the harmony betweene the Prophet Ieremy and the Prophet Zachary concerning the man whose name is the branch How his growth or springing up was prefigured by Zerubbabel the sonne of David His name and title as our high Priest fore-pictured by the name and title of Iesus the Sonne of Iosedech That he was as truly the Son of God before all time as the sonne of David in time THat this man whose name was the Branch was to build the Temple of the Lord that he was to take his investiture unto his priestly dignity by Iesus the Sonne of Iehosadech as by his proxie is apparent from the sixt Chapter of the Prophet Zachary 11. Take silver and gold and make Crownes and set them upon the head of Ieshua the Sonne of Iosedech the high Priest and speake unto him saying thus speaketh the Lord of hasts saying Behold the man whose name is the Branch and hee shall grow up out of his place hee shall build the Temple of the Lord even hee shall build the Temple of the Lord and he shall beare the glory and shall sit and rule upon his throne and he shall be a Priest upon his Throne and the counsell of peace shall be betweene them both 2 This place and the former are pregnant that the Servant of the Lord whose name was Zemah the Branch whose office was to build up the Temple of God should be a Priest and should sit upon his Throne as Priest But it cannot from either place be gathered it is not so much as intimated that hee should either be a Priest after the order of Aaron or of Melchisedech or of the seede of Aaron as Iesus or Ioshua the Sonne of Iehosedech was But as the Prophet affirmeth not that hee was to be Priest after the order of Aaron or Melchisedech so neither in plaine termes doth hee deny it true but as every Prophet of God speakes nothing but the truth so neither doth one of them speake all the truth or all that is requisite for us to believe concerning Iesus our Saviour That the man whose name was the Branch the same party of whom Zachary here speakes should not be of the seed of Aaron or a Priest after the order of Aaron is evident from the prophecy of Ieremiah Ier. 23. 5. uttered more then seventy yeares before Zachary began to prophecy Behold the dayes come saith the Lord that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch and a King shall raigne and prosper and shall execute judgment and justice upon the earth In his dayes Iudah shall be saved and Israel shall dwell safely and this is his name whereby he shall be called the Lord our righteousnesse It is plaine then out of the fore cited prophecy of Zachary that God's servant the righteous Branch was to be a Priest It is evident againe out of Ieremiah that he was to spring out of the seede of David and to raigne as King over Iudah and Israel as David had done And these two put together will directly conclude that this Branch of David was to be that sonne of David concerning whom the Lord had sworne and would not repent that hee should be a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedech who was both King and Priest and by interpretation the King of righteousnesse and King of peace both which titles are expressely given to this Servant of God and Branch of David the one by the Prophet Zachary the other by the Prophet Ieremiah 3 But is it intimated or fore-told by either of them that he should be as truly David's Lord as David's Sonne Yes Ieremy implies this in fuller termes then David himselfe doth Psalm 110. for David saith the Lord said unto my Lord Adonai not Iehovah whereas the Prophet Ieremy tells us that the supreame style or title of this Branch of David should be not Adonai Tzadkenu but Iehova Tzadkenu Iehovah our righteousnesse So that hee whom David in spirit calleth his Lord was to be as essentially Lord and God as he that said unto him sit thou on my right hand till I make thine enemies thy foot stoole But was he according unto this name or title
did solemnely confesse and acknowledg Christ Iesus to be as truly God as man The matter or object directly signified by these words is the only true and reall Foundation of faith as Christian of the Catholique Church it selfe Of this ranke or sort of names is the name Iehosadech as it was given unto the Father of Iesus the high Priest but this doth no way import that he was either Iehovah or a man more righteous thē other high Priests had beene and yet so called not by chance or out of vain ostentation of his parents but by divine instinct or appointment of God Or whatsoever intent his parēts might have in giving him this name God did so direct their intentiōs as he did Caiphas his speech to be a kind of prophecy of what was to come We may say of Iehosadech as the Angell said of Iesus and his fellow-Priests that hee was vir portendens his very name and office did portend or bode that Iehovah himselfe the righseous Lord should become our high Priest And in as much as the Sonne of Iehosadech was the first high Priest the first of all the sonnes of Aaron that was called Iesus that is a Saviour this likewise did portend or fore-shadow that the Saviour of God's people the high Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedech should be the son not of David only but of Iebovah the righteous Lord or Lord of righteousnesse And if he were to be as truly the Sonne of Iehovah the righteous Lord as he was to be the sonne of David then questionlesse hee was to be as truely Iehovah that is as truly and essentially God as hee is truly and essentially man For the relation betwixt the Father and the Sonne is much more strict in the Divine nature then it can be amongst men 9 Amongst men it will follow that if the Father be a man the Sonne must be a man if the Father be mortall the Sonne must be mortall but it will not follow that if the Father be a righteous or potent man the Sonne likewise must be a righteous or potent man The reason is because they are divided in substance But in as much as the Sonne of God is of the same substance or essence with his Father it will directly follow not only that if the Father be God the Sonne is God but also that if the Father be Lord of righteousnesse the Sonne also must be Lord of righteousnesse Yet in as much as not Iehosadech the Father but Iesus the Sonne became legall righteousnesse or a temporall Saviour to God's people in captivity this truly fore-shadoweth this truth unto us that although God the Father be as truly the Lord of righteousnesse as God the Sonne both being of one substance yet is Iehovah become our righteousnesse and our salvation not in the person of the Father but in the person of the Son CHAP. 23. The obiection of the Iewes against the interpretation of the former Prophecy Ierem. 23. answered In what sense Iudah is truly said to be saved and Israel to dwell in safety by Iesus the Sonne of God and Sonne of David YEt here the Iew will object that this prophecy is not yet fulfilled because Iudah is not fully saved nor Israel planted in their owne land But the Apostle hath fully answered this objection if wee could as rightly apply his solution All saith he are not Israel that are called Israel Rom. 9. 6. Yet many are true Israelites indeed which are not so in name Nor is he a Iew that is one outwardly but that is one inwardly The Apostle in the same place gives us to understand that many are Iewes or of Iudah inwardly which are not of Iudah outwardly or so called by name Whosoever is inwardly or in heart that which the name of Iudah importeth he is truly of Iudah though not the seede of Iudah or of Abraham concerning the flesh Now the name of Iudah or Iew importeth as much as a confessor or true professor of Abraham's faith and every one is a true Israelite that is so qualified as Nathaniel was one in whose spirit there is no guile unto all such and only unto such the Lord imputeth no sinne and all they unto whom the Lord imputeth no sinne all such as truly confesse Christ to be the Sonne of God and promised Branch of David are saved by him whether they be the somes of Iacob or of Abraham or Gentiles according to the flesh So that in conclusion all ludah and all Israel according to the full extent of this prophecy are saved by this Iesus for all of them dwell in safety they are not become afraid of themselves but possesse their soules with patience To become Iewes or Israelites in this sense is the first degree of salvation and this degree they likewise have from Iesus through whom and in whom they are to expect the accomplishment of their salvation Christ then first saves us from our sins that are inherent in us or as the Apostle speaks hee first sets us free from the Law of sinne by the spirit of life which is in him and finally exempts us from the wages of sinne which is everlasting death And thus much is contained in that fore-cited promise Ierem. 16. and in the close and conclusion of that prophecie Ierem. 23. concerning the saving of Iudah and Israel by the branch of David whose name or title is The Lord our righteousnesse Behold the dayes come saith the Lord that they shall no more say the Lord liveth which brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt but the Lord liveth which brought up and which led the seede of the house of Israel out of the North country The Hebrew phrase Meeretz zaponah according to the usuall and ordinary rate of that language signifies indeed from the North-land yet the originall of this signification or importance of these words was from a conceit which the Iews or such as had their habitation neere unto the Aequinoctiall line had That those parts of the world which were more remote from the Aequinoctiall or Southerne climes were hidden from the sun and were at least in respect of their Country lands of obscurity and darknesse The very prime and native signification of the originall words in the Prophet rendred by our English from the North land or Country is verbatim from the land of obscurity or darknesse And whatsoever the land of Chaldea whereof Babylon was the chiefe City or Metropolis was unto others it was unto the captive Iewes a country of darknesse a land of obscurity the very shadow of death And their deliverance from it was a true type or shadow of our deliverance from the region or land of darknesse it selfe The full importance of the Evangellicall mystery included in the fore-cited passage of the Prophet Ieremy according to the most proper and most exquisite literall sense is expounded unto us by our Apostle S. Paul Coloss 1. 12. 13. God the
of being granted prove only thus much that the only begotten Son of God or first born to Abraham and to David had a just title to the eternall Priesthood They doe not directly prove that Iesus whom the Iewes have crucified to be that Sonne of God and seed of David meant by the Psalmist in the Psalme fore-cited Or this being granted all put together doe not manifest his Consecration or actuall admission to the high Priesthood by whose erection the Priesthood of Aaron was changed which is the conclusion punctually intended by our Apostle 4 For a more satisfactory declaration of the strength of this argument we are to take the words of the Psalmist into a further and more punctuall consideration then hitherto wee had occasion to take them As first of what GENERATION these words ego hodie genuite are principally meant whether meant at all of David or how of him and how of Christ the Sonne of God and Sonne of David 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Many of the Ancients being seconded by more of the Schoolmen and middle ag'd allegorizing Commentators understand this Psalmist's Oracle of that GENERATION of the Sonne of God which is mentioned in the NICEN Creed or that Creed which is to be publiquely read in the second service of our Church Begotten of his Father before all worlds and in these mens construction by the word HODIE is meant HODIE AETERNITATIS the day of eternity or eternal day wherein there is no succession of parts of houres or minutes But this interpretation is dislik'd by Calvin who is alwaies zealous for the literall though sometimes with prejudice to the mysticall or principally intended sense Yet that sense in this place cannot be exprest by HODIE AETERNITATIS or by the eternall Generation of the Sonne of God That it cannot be the literall sense of this Psalmist is apparent because neither the Resurrection of the Son of God nor his Consecration to the everlasting Priesthood can with any colour of probability be inferred or pretended from it much lesse can it be the mysticall or true allegoricall sense of this Oracle for these alwaies must be grounded upon the literall and no Scripture can be said to be fulfil'd according to the mysticall or true allegoricall sense untill it hath been first verified according to the literall sense Now the eternall GENERATION of the Sonne of God cannot follow either his Resurrection from the dead or his Consecration to his everlasting Priesthood nor could ever any Periphrasis or notation of it be either fulfil'd or verified in time seeing it is before all times 5 May we say then with good Commentators as with Calvin for one that these words this day have I begotten thee have no manner of reference to the Son of God's Generation before all worlds Certaine it is that this Generation is no part of the object no part of the immediate subject whether according to the literall or mysticall sense of the Psalmist's words whether we consider them written or intended by him or as avouched by S. Paul and other Apostles for the further confirmation of Christ's Resurrection from the dead All that can be said on their parts whom Calvin censures is this that the eternall GENERATION of the Son of God might be taken as a common notion or presuppos'd truth both by the Psalmist when he writ and by the Apostle when hee avouched these words ego hodie genuite That the Word or Sonne of God was from Eternity this was a common prenotion to all the Ancient learned or faithfull Hebrewes And that he who was the only begotten Sonne of God before all worlds should be begotten by him from the dead that is prov'd at large by S. Paul Act. 13. And that the raising of that Iesus the Sonne of David whom the Iewes had crucified from the dead unto immortall endlesse life was an authentique declaration that this Sonne of David was likewise the Sonne of God their expected Lord and Messias is most sweetly deduced by our Apostle Rom. â— v. 1. 2. 3. 4. Paul a Servant of Iesus Christ called to be an Apostle separated unto the Gospel of God Which hee had promised before by the Prophets in the holy Scriptures concerning his Son Iesus Christ our Lord which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh And declared to be the Son of God with power according to the Spirit of holinesse by the Resurrection from the dead This passage rightly infers that Christ was the Son of God the uncreated Word by whomall things were created before hee was made the Son of David â—â—â— he was made so only according to the flesh or humane nature but this eternity of his uncreated Person or essence was no part of our Apostles divine discourse or most concludent argument Act â—3 Men and Brethren children of the stock of Abraham and whosoeuer among you feareth God to you is the word of this salvation sent For they that dwell at Jerusalem and their Rulers because they know â—â—â— not nor yet the voiceâ— of the Prophets which are â—â—â—â— every Sabbath day they have fulfilled them in condemning him And though they found no cause of death in him yet desired they Pilat that he should be â—â—â—ine And when they had fulfilled all that is written of him they tooke him downe from the tree and laid him in a Sepulchre But God raised him from the dead and he was seene many daies of them which came up with him from Galileo â—â— Ierusalem who are his witnesses â—â—to the people And we declare unto you glad tidings how that the promise which was made unto the Fathers God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children in that he hath raised up Iesus againe as it is also written in the second Psalme Thou are my Sonne this day have I begotten theâ— And as concerning that he raised him up from the dead now no more to returne to corruption he said on this wise I will give you the sure mercies of David from v. 26. to 34. For the clearer fuller explication of this passage we are to enquire what manner of testimonies or predictions in which the Apostle instances were as whether propheticall only or typically propheticall 6 To begin with the former Ego hodie genui te this day have I begotten thee that with submission of my opinion to better judgments is a prediction typically propheticall which kind of prediction as hath been observed before is the most concludent and this one of the highest ranke in that kind that is an Oracle truly meant of David according to the literall sense and yet fulfil'd of Christ the Son of God by his Resurrection from the dead both according to the most exquisite literall and the mysticall or principally intended sense David without all question was the composer of the second Psalme and the joyfull occasions or extraordinary matter of exultation which raised his spirit to that high and majesticke straine of divine
poesie whereof this and the eighteenth Psalme with some others beare lively characters were partly the triumphant victories which he had already gotten over the enemies of Israel's peace and the confederators or conspirators against his Crowne and dignity partly the glorious promises which through patient expectation of deliverance hee had obtain'd for the further establishment and advancement of his throne and the enlargement of his hereditary Kingdome Before the composition of the second Psalme hee had the glorious and gracious promise of which Ethan the Esrait so curiously descants Psalm 89. I will make him my first borne higher then the Kings of the earth c. Now it can be no solecisme to say that hee who in sacred language is instil'd the first borne should have the title of the first begotten among the Princes of the earth Seeing the title of begetting is oftimes in sacred language to be measured not by the scale of Philophes'â— or naturalist's dialect â—ut of morall or civill language or interpretation For they that are sonnes by adoption only or next heires in reversion to a Crowne or dignity are said to be begotten of those which adopt thâ—â— or of whom they be the immediate heares or successors and in this sense in the sacred genealogy Ieconiah is said to have begotten Salathiel So that David upon his owne occasions whether upon his anointing to the Crowne of Iudah in Hâ—â—ron or of Israel in Sion might in the literall sense avouch these words Psalme 2. of himselfe I will preach the Law whereof the Lord said unto mee thâ—â— art my Sâ—â—t his day have I begotten thee 7 For David to call the day of his Coronation or of his designâ—ment unto the Crowne of Iudah or of all Israel his birth-day or begetting by God by whose speciall power and providence hee was crowned is not so harsh a phrase as some haply would deeme it that either know not or consider not that it was usuall in other states or Kingdomes beside Iudah to celebrate two nâ—tales dies two solemne 〈◊〉 or birth-dayes in honour of their Kings and Emperours the one they called diem natalem imperatoris the other diem natalem imperij The one the birth-day of the Emperour whereon he was borne of his naturall Mother the other the birth-day of him as he was Emperour which wee call the Coronation day The reason might hold more peculiar in David then many other Princes because he was the first of all the seed of Abraham that tooke possession of the hill of Sion and setled the Kingdome of Iudah fore-phophecied of by his Father Iacob upon himselfe and his posterity 8 But whatsoever may be thought of David or of his sonne the day of our Saviour's Resurrection may be as truly and properly called the day of his nativity as the day wherein he was borne of the blessed Virgin Mary This was his birth-day or nativity to his mortall life as he was the son of man that was the day of his nativity or begetting to immortality the birth-day of his Kingdome and royall Priesthood The most concludent testimony though least observed by most Interpreters is that of the Apostle before mentioned Heb. 5. v. 4. No man taketh this honour to wit of Priesthood but hee that is called of God as was Aaron So also Christ glorified not himselfe to be made an high Priest but hee that said unto him Thou art my Son to day have I begotten thee It was hee that did glorifie him with this title as he also saith in another place thou art a Priest forever after the order of Melchisedech The Apostles drift and meaning is that our Saviour did not intrude himselfe into the Priesthood but had as solemne a calling and Consecration â—o it by God his Father as Aaron had to the legall Priesthood by Moses And he did deprecate his calling or Consecration to this Priesthood more earnestly and fervently then any high Priest or Bishop did their Consecration Although they say Episcopari nolâ— they have no desire to be consecrated But sure our Saviour spake as hee meant when hee prayed unto his Father Father if it be possible let this cup passe from me Now thus he prayed after God had begun to anoint and bath him in his owne blood unto the Priesthood after the order of Melchisedech as Moses had anointed Aaron with the blood of beasts unto his legall Priesthood And this place of our Apostle concludes the point before handled to wit that our Saviour did begin his Priesthood after the order of Melchisedech from the day of his Resurrection for upon that day was the Psalmist's prophecy fulfilled Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee 9 The fulfilling of this Oracle meant of David according to the literall according to the mysticall sense in Christ Iesu the Son of David is most divinely exprest by S. Luke Acts 3. 4. in which two Chapters many passages above all others in this sacred history are worthy of serious and frequent mediations specially in respect of the circumstances of time and some other occurrences The holy Ghost as it is at large related Chap. 2. had been first powred out upon Christ's Disciples a litle before the ordinary time of the morning's service or devotions at this solemne feast of Pentecost And upon the same day as 't is very probable from the first verse of the third Chapter Peter and Iohn went together unto the Temple at the houre of praiers being the ninth houre and bestowed a better almes upon a poore creeple then after many yeares profession of that poore trade he durst presume to begge at their hands or pray to God for 10 The ungainsayable truth of the miracle wrought upon this creeple by Peter and Iohn who had they been as ambitiously minded as their examiners might have challenged the glory of it to themselves did not so much grieve the Priests and captaines of the Temple with the Sadduces as that upon this occasion they taught the people and preached the Resurrection of the dead through Iesus Christ Chap. 4. ver 2. 3. Vpon this griefe conceived at first by some few there present the next morning the high Priest with the whole host of his assistants and kndred did injoyne these two Apostles not to teach at all or speake in the name of Iesus but upon that magnanimous reply whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more then unto God judge yee ver 19. made joyntly by Peter and Iohn to the high Priest's and Elders peremptory injunction being let goe they made report of the whole businesse with the successe unto their owne company who when they heard it lift up their voice to God with one accord and said Lord thou art God which hast made heaven and earth and the Sea and all that in them is who by the mouth of thy servant David hast said why did the heathen rage and the people imagine a vaine
the first day of that weeke wherein our Redemption was wrought our Saviour came in triumphant manner into Ierusalem not only to fulfill the prophecy of Zachary before expounded at large for that might have been fulfilled at any other time or day for its substance but to testifie withall that hee was the true paschall Lambe appointed pointed for the sacrifice of that great Feast that Lambe of God which â—ame too take away the sinnes of the world For upon that very day of the month Abib were it the tenth or ninth in which our Saviour came to Ierusalem saluted with ecchoing cries of Hosanna the Son of David was the legall paschall Lambe according to first institution of the Passeover brought out of the fields unto the place appointed for the publique assembly with greater pompe perhaps and solemnity prescribed by custome than was expressely required in the Law Vpon the fifth day day of this â—acred weeke being as I take it the fourteenth of the month Abib our Saviour being to be offered in sacrifice at the time wherein the paschall Lambe was eaten by seterall families did eate the Passeover with his Disciples and preoccupated the usuall day for eating the paschall Lambe upon necessity In the night following which was the evening of the sixth day hee was apprehended and arraigned in the morning of the same day condemned by the Iewes â— and upon their solicitation adjudged by Pilate to be crucified and executed by the Roman Souldiers In the sixth day or which is all one the sixth evening and morning of the first weeke of times succession God is said to have finished the workes of Creation by making the first man In the sixth day or in the sixth evening and morning of the weeke of our Saviour's Consecration Hee by whom the world was made did solemnely declare the worke of our Redemption to be accomplished in respect of any labour worke or paines to be further undertaken by him For so farie his solemne proclamation upon the Crosse extends consummatum est And so he went into his rest upon the same day about the same houre wherein God was said to rest from all his workes of Creation that is in the close of that day a litle before the evening of the seventh day or Sabbath CHAP. 41. A Parallel betweene the day wherein Adam is thought to have been cast out of Paradise with the day wherein our Saviour was Crucified And betweene the first day of the world's Creation and our Saviour's Resurrection THere is a a tradition or rather a received opinion avouched by many good Authors in their severall writings that Adam the first man should fall and forfeit his estate in Paradise upon the same day wherein he was created The opinion it selfe we cannot disprove nor justly suspect to be a meere conjecture because we know not what warrant the first or immediate Authors of this Doctrine had to commend it to posterity But their language I take it is much mistaken by some later school-men the first Authors meaning or expression of it must be limited or rather extended to the same sense or construction as hath been before observed in the like words of Daniel Chap. 7. That Belshazer was slaine in the same night wherein after his carousing in the boules of the Sanctuary the hand-writing was seen upon the wall or that other 2. of Kings that Senacherib's mighty army was discomfitted upon the night immediately following that day wherein he sent that blasphemous message unto Hezekiah or the day wherein Isaiah returned his message to the good King In both places the same night cannot be understood of the selfe same naturall day and night but of the same night or day after the revolution of one yeare or more In like manner the first man according to the tenor of the former received opinion did fall upon the same day wherein he was created yet not upon the same day numerically individually or identically taken but upon the same day after the revolution of a weeke at least or more that is upon the sixth day and thrust out of Paradise before the Sabbath ensuing for his stealth or presumptuous usurpation of the forbidden fruit Vpon the same day after revolution of many yeares the Son of God or second Adam now consecrated to be a quickning spirit did restore the sons of the first Adam to their inheritance which their Father had lost by giving a true naturall son of the first Adam a thiefe by practise liverie de sezin or actuall possession of the coelestiall Paradise The bequest or legacy was punctuall and solemne Amen dico tibi hodie mecum eris in Paradiso Verily I say unto thee this day shalt thou be with me in Paradise Vpon the sixth day of the first week or week of Creation or vicissitude of times Adam's body was taken out of the substance of the earth Vpon the same sixth day was the body of the second Adam the Son of God shut up into the bowels of the earth after he had commended his spirit into his Father's hands which had given it him That temporall curse denounced against the first Adam In the day wherein thou eatest thou shalt die the death was exactly now fulfilled in the second Adam For in the sixth day of the weeke of his Consecration he died the death of the Crosse and was delivered to the earth whence the first man was taken only he was not to be resolved to dust but rested there without corruption For as God had rested the Seventh day from his works of Creation though not of Preservation so the Son of God was to rest from all his labour or toile upon the seventh day of the week of his Consecration not only to blesse and sanctify that day and make it his own but withall to hallow the grave or the wombe of the earth whence all flesh was taken and by the course of nature must returne by his sweet rest and presence in it So saith S. Iohn I heard a voice from heaven saying Blessed are the dead which hereafter die in the Lord even so saith the spirit for they rest from their labours and their workes follow them Rev. 14 ver 13. Their sleepe or quiet rest in the grave thus hollowed by our Saviour's Death and rest in it becomes the evenings or vespers of their everlasting Sabbath 2 The night immediately following the legall Sabbath wherein our Saviour did rest from all his Labours was part of the first evening and morning or of the first naturall day of the weeke His Resurrection upon that day and at that time of the day and at that season implieth a two-fold mystery or the accomplishment of two remarkable divine Oracles First that of Gen. Chap. 1. ver 1. 2. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth and the earth was without forme and void and darknesse was upon the deepe The darknesse made the evening and the separation of the light from