Selected quad for the lemma: sin_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
sin_n offer_v sacrifice_n shed_v 3,218 5 9.9717 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A38405 Englands iustification for her religion Wherein it is maintayned to be the same our Saviour Iesus Christ hath taught us. Presented to the high court of Parliament. By a well-wisher of peace in the Church, and happinesse to the Kingdome. Well-wisher of peace in the Church, and happinesse to the Kingdome. 1641 (1641) Wing E2991; ESTC R218201 47,162 84

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

question of this kinde Therefore thus much may heere suffice to shew that by the errour of transubstantiation there is not left any bread vpon the Lords table by them that affirme the bread to bee changed into flosh and therefore that this part of the Sacrament is wanting in the Masse Now for the other the same may bee said concerning the wine which they doe likewise teach to bee turned into the very blood of Christ But it appeareth also further in that they haue sacrilegiously robbed the Lords table of that blessed cup that belongeth to it For although they suffer the Priest to drinke of the cuppe and the people also to drinke wine yet the wine that they giue the people is not consecrated nor any part of the Sacrament Therefore in such administration is committed a sacrilegious abuse in robbing the Lords table and his people of the cuppe of blessing which is the communion as the Apostle Paul speaketh of the blood of Christ and contrariwise our administration of the Lord Supper in both kinds of bread and wine is according to the Doctrine practice and commandement of our Sauiour Christ and of his Apostles Furthermore as by this meanes the Sea of Rome hath abolished both parts of the Sacrament so hath it peruerted the right end and vse for which it was instituted For that being as hath beene declared and as it is made knowne to the people in our administration of it to bee a Sacrament whereby wee celebrate the memory of the death of Christ for our sinnes to the signing and confirming vnto vs our spirituall communion with him to the participation of all his giftes euen to life euerlasting The Church of Rome hath transfigured this Sacrament into a sacrifice propitiatory for the sinnes of the liuing and of the dead And to this end they haue brought into the Church of Christ contrary to his word a Priest and an Altar that nothing might bee wanting to the offering of their sacrifice In which sacrifice they teach that the Priest doth offer Christ enery day vnto his Father as a sacrifice to take away sinnes Of which propitiatory Sacrifice our Sauiour Christ his Apostles haue made no mention at all but onely of a commemoration of the death of Christ in the celebration whereof wee magnifie God and our Sauiour for such vnspeakeable mercy and goodnesse and so offer as it were a Sacrifice of thanksgiuing pleasing and acceptable to God in Christ Iesus But of offering a sacrifice propitiatory to take away our sinnes and that daily and by the Priest there is no word in the Scripture for it Contrariwise the Scriptures teach directly the contrary and declare this Doctrine to bee full of errour and Blasphemy For the Scriptures teach vs that there is but one only Sacrifice that taketh away the sinnes of men which is that holy Sacrifice which our Sauiour Christ offered of himselfe that is of his humane nature assumed for that purpose and that by his eternall Spirit and that also once for all Heb. 9.14.25 26 28. namely dying vpon the Altar of the crosse and by the Sacrifice so offered he hath obtained an euerlasting redemption Wherefore to affirme that the Priest offereth Christ daily in Sacrifice for sinnes derogateth highly from the death of Christ whereby the sinnes of the faithfull are taken away as if that had not beene sufficient contrary to the whole course of the Scripture attributing our redemption to his death and blood shed vpon the Crosse Secondly This Doctrine highly derogateth from the vertue of the death of Christ in that it teacheth that Christ must bee daily offered for sinne whereas the Scriptures teach expresly the contrary saying that Christ was to dye but once Rom. 3.24 25. Rom 5.8.9 Gal. 2.14 Heb. 9.25 and to be offered but once and so to enter into heauen and not as the High-Priest in the Law once euery yeare offered sacrifice and so entered into the holy place For then as the Apostle there teacheth he should haue suffered often since the beginning of the world But now saith he in the end and consummation of the world Christ was manifested to abolish sinne by the sacrifice of himselfe Moreouer it is sayd that Christ offered his sacrifice by his eternall Spirit Heb. 9.26 whereby wee are taught that it was by the power of his Godhead that his sacrifice and blood was of so pretious inestimable and infinite value as being the bloed of God as the Apostle speaketh elsewhere which redeemed and purchased the Church Act. 20.28 Therefore it is open blasphemy to affirme that the Priest offereth Christ vnto his Father a Sacrifice for sinne which the Scriptures attributeth to Christs eternall Spirit and Godhead Furthermore many other are the abuses committed by the Church of Rome in abusing this holy Sacrament to sundry other ends for which Christ did neuer ordaine it For they abuse it to obtaine bodily health and prosperous successe of voyages at Sea of battels of marriage and such like They abuse it to recouer things that are lost to the quenching of Fire to the calming of Stormes and Tempests at Sea and at Land to ratifie leagues to triall of the innocent in Criminall causes and finally to deliuer soules as they faine out of Purgatory For these and such like ends they haue Masses said and sung and peruert the most holy ordinance of Christ to their secular and prophane desires Moreouer according to the Doctrine of our Sauiour Christ and his Apostles this Sacrament is with vs to bee administred so as not onely the Minister alone receiue it but others with him For so our Sauiour deliuered it to his Disciples and said Take ye eate and drinke yee all of this Likewise the Apostle Paul calleth the bread of the Lords table the Communion of the Lords body and the cuppe of blessing the Communion of his blood Whereby it is playne that this Sacrament ought to bee administred in a Congregation of the faithfull and Christian people which together with the minister should be partakers of the Lords table But contrary to this ordinance of Christ are all the priuate Masses of the Church of Rome in that the Priest alone hauing eaten vp his host as hee calleth it and drunke vp his wine sendeth the people empty away after that hee hath blest them with the empty cuppe to the high dishonour of God and the intollerable scorne and derision of his people Heere unto is to be added that horrible idolatrie that is the abominable fruit of the monstrous errour of Transubstantiation For from hence came the eleuation and adoration of the wafer-cake which the Priest with his backe toward the people lifting vp ouer his head all the people present falling downe vpon their knees and knocking their breasts religiously worship and adore euen with the same adoration which themselues acknowledge to bee done to God And after the Masse finished and ended they relerue the wafer-cake remaining whereas by
that by the offering of himselfe once hee had redeemed his people hee entred into heauen it selfe that hee may now appeare for vs before the face of God Which doctrine doth manifestly teach vs that to make intercession for vs to procure vs and our Prayers grace and fauour with God for euer is the proper and peculiar honor of our Sauiour Christ and without high treason against his dignity cannot bee communicated with any other For there is one onely high Priest of the New Testament which is Iesus Christ and therefore there can bee no other neither can that office bee made common to him with any other without high derogation to his Priesthood Beside that onely high Priest of the New Testament is made Priest of the order of Melchisedech of whose order none can bee but hee that is without Father and Mother and genealogie and therefore no other man whatsoeuer but hee that is also God Againe he that is a Priest of the order of Melchisedeck must haue beene made Priest by the oath of God but this agreeth onely to Christ as it is said Heb 7.21 I haue sworne and will not repent that thou art a Priest for euer after the order of Melchisedeck Further whosoeuer is a Priest of that order must bee also King of the Church Heb. 7.21 as Melchesedeck was a Priest and also King of Salem and as his name imported a King of righteousnesse But this honor cannot without high treason against the royall dignity of Christ bee communicated with any creature whatsoeuer Moreouer seeing there are two parts and duties belonging to this Priesthood and that the one which is to bee the aduocate that maketh suite and intercession for the Church and the other to offer himselfe to make propitiation for our sinnes and that none can bee our aduocate but hee that maketh propitiation for vs it is playne that wee can haue no other aduocate but the same that dyed for vs. And that this is so may bee proued many wayes The Apostle Iohn saith 1 Iohn 2.1.2 Wee haue an aduocate with the Father which is Iesus Christ the righteous who is the propitiation for our sinnes By which words it appeareth to appertaine to one and the same person to bee the aduocate and to make propitiation and satisfaction for our sinnes But there is no creature that can make satisfaction for our sinnes this being of all parts confessed to belong onely to Christ Iesus Therefore also to bee aduocate and intercessor for the Church cannot belong to any creature either man or Angell but is proper to Iesus Christ And if any should deny it to bee proper to the person of Christ to make propitiation for our sinnes it may bee proued by this that the Apostle Paul saith Act. 10.28 That God redeemed the Church by his blood so calling it the blood of God wherewith the Church is redeemed because in the same person of Iesus Christ are both the nature of man whose blood was shed and the nature of God which made it of inestimable prize and value to bee effectuall to redeeme the Church But the blood of no other Person can bee called the blood of God therefore no other person can make satisfaction for sinne and reconcile vs vnto God Now touching the intercession of Christ it is to be considered that it is by the same his owne blood that he entred into heauen as the High-Priest entred into the holyest place of the Sanctuary with strange blood there to appeare alwayes in the presence of God as our aduocate and to make intercession for vs. Which being the blood of God as hath bene declared whereby he entered into heauen and that because hee is as it were sprinkled with that most precious blood of inestimable value hee is worthy to obtaine fauour for all his redeemed and hearing for all their Prayers It is plaine heereby that no other Person whatsoeuer can bee our intercessor because they are not entered by that blood into heauen nor cannot present themselues sprinkled with it before the presence of God thereby to obtaine fauour with him for vs and our Prayers Finally that Iesus Christ and no other person can bee our intercessor with God is proued by this that it behooueth him that should present our Prayers to know all the prayers of the Church But this none other but God knoweth for this is a part of the high stile proper to God That he knoweth the heart Therefore no other person but Iesus Christ can bee intercessor Psal 44.21 2 Chro. 6.30 Act. 1.24 Act. 15.8 Rom. 8.15 Gal. 9.6 Rom. 8.26 and to whom else can it agree but to him whose Spirit teacheth vs to call Abba Father and who onely vnderstandeth the meaning of the spiri● that teacheth vs to pray with vnspeakable gronings as being his owne Spirit that stireth vp those sighes in the faithfull By all which reasons it is proued that no person amongst all creatures can bee our intercessor to offer our prayers to God and by whom wee are to offer them but on the contrary that it is onely by the person of Iesus Christ Thus both these poynts in the prayers of our Church in England are shewed to bee grounded in the Doctrine of Christ and of his Apostles Now it followeth to shew that contrary to this Doctrine of Christ and of his Apostles the Church of Rome maketh prayers to other then to God onely and by other Mediators and intercessors then by the onely Mediator and intercessor Iesus Christ the righteous who is the propitiation for our sinnes which is first to bee shewed Now if the liturgie vsed in the Church of Rome bee compared with the diuine Seruice in England in these two principall poynts concerning Prayer it will bee cleare to all that haue eyes to see that as our practise in them is directly that which was taught by our Sauiour Christ and his Apostles so that which is vsed in the Church of Rome is directly contrary to Christs most holy doctrine and that was deliuered by the Prophets and Apostles For touching the former poynt which is that all prayers petitions requests supplications and thanksgiuings are to bee made and yelded to God onely In the Liturgie of the Church of Rome there are many prayers petitions and thanksgiuings that are made and yeelded vnto Creatures and euen vnto the Images and representations of them They are made protectors and patrons to bee prayed vnto for helpe by seuerall Countryes Cittyes Kindreds States orders professions artificers houses persons Their helpe is prayed for seuerally according to diuers states of men Knights men of study Physitians Lawyers artificers as Painters Shoomakers Smithes Potters Likewise according to sundry occasions of the liuing Creatures they possesse diuersly as for Geese Sheepe Horses Oxen. They pray also to sundry Patrons to bee deliuered from stormes and tempests from Earthquakes Fyres and blastings And in case of diuers fickenesses they pray to sundry helpers