to be reverenced and doth strongly convince Private spirits when we can say none have as yet thought thus besides your selfe Secondly the true use of the ancient writers is in convincing those adversaries which trust unto them and relie upon them for although this follow not the Fathers say thus therefore it is true yet this followes these men pretend to follow the Doctrine of the Fathers yet in their opinions varie frō yea are enemies unto the Fathers and therefore they doe but deceive and juggle with the world making a shew of that which is not This is the usuall pranke of the Papists to exclaime that all the Fathers are on their side and when the matter comes to triall their Judges condemne them and the Fathers speake against them Thirdly the use of the Ancients is for the moving of the affections of their hearers for certainely modest Christians and ingenious natures will be much moved and strongly perswaded when they heare the thing they are exhorted to embrace not onely to be consonant to Scriptures but also agreeable to the example counsell and resolution of the Fathers Fourthly the use of the Fathers is to direct us in outward things or to teach us the nature of indifferent things how farre they may bee used and how they are abused Sect. 3 § 3. Whosoever is angry with his brother c. Quest 1 What is the meaning of this verse in general or of the words distinguished herein namely Anger Racha Foole Iudgement Counsell Fire Answ 1 If the Reader desire full satisfaction herein I referre him to Mr. Weemes in the tractate of the Judiciall Law of Moses lib. 1. chap. 16. and Doctor Field of the Church who will resolve him in this particular m D. Field of the Church lib. 5. cap. 9. for my own part I forbeare to transcribe them they being both in English and easily to be had Answ 2 Secondly because I would not leave my Reader altogether unresolved I intreat him to take notice that our Saviour here observes three degrees of anger The first is in the sudden heat and boyling of the affection inwardly without cause layd downe in these words Whosoever is angry with his brother unadvisedly The second is in shewing of this indignation outwardly by any disdainfull words as in calling one Racha that is idle-head light-braine for so Rik in the Hebrew to which this Syrian word Raka agreeth both in found and sense signifieth light or vaine u Iuniur s This indignation may bee expressed also by other signes as by grinning frowning spitting and such like The third degree of anger consists in open railing as calling one Foole with other tearmes of reviling which is a weapon fit for the Gyant with three hands because Tres quasi uno ictu occidit o Basting it killeth three as it were with one blow first himselfe that revileth and raileth Secondly him that giveth credit to his reviling and railing Thirdly him who is slandeted and reviled Answ 3 Thirdly as our Saviour maketh difference of the sinnes so also hee here sheweth three degrees of punishments alluding to the publicke forme of judgement used among the Jewes For first there was the Session of judgement of three who judged of small causes Secondly there was the Councell of three and twentie who determined more weighty matters Thirdly the great Synedrion or Judicatorie which consisted of seventie and two sixe chosen of every Tribe who sometimes convented before them the High Priest and sometimes false Prophets yea sometimes a whole Tribe as reverend Beza thinkes Fourthly from these premises I thus conclude Answ 4 and determine the question First hee that suffers anger to boyle in his breast shall be censured in the secret judgement of God Secondly hee that bewrayeth his indignation by opprobrious words shall be held guiltie before all the assembly of heavenly Angels and Saints Thirdly he that raileth and revileth shall bee judged worthy of hell fire that is of the greatest punishment For foure kindes of punishments were practised and exercised among the Jewes whereby they put malefactors to death First strangling secondly the sword thirdly stoning fourthly the fire Of the which they thought the last to bee the worst as Beza affirmes upon this place Or if wee looke to the former words they will helpe us to the true understanding of these It was sayd of old Thou shalt not kill and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of judgement where we see the Jewes held a murderer to bee guiltie of judgement and that not onely positively but privatively as if our Saviour would say yee yeeld the homicide to be guiltie of judgement who really takes away his brothers life but hee is not called into judgement with you who sheddes not his brothers bloud although he hate him in his heart revile him with his tongue But ego dico I say unto you whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of judgement Where wee see Christ gives as much to anger as they to murder p Areti s And therefore the true sence and meaning of the words I take to bee this Hee that is angry shall bee guiltie of judgement that is at the day of judgement hee shall give account and answer for that his anger q Math. 12.36 Hee that calles his brother Racha shall bee guiltie of a Councell that is shall bee more severely punished than the former as his sinne is greater Hee that calles his brother Foole shall bee guiltie of hell fire that is is condemned already before God r Augu. s And yet all these three are eternall punishments and the first may be resembled unto a pettie Sessions the second unto a generall Assizes the third to Marshall law Quest 2 Are then some of these mortall sinnes some veniall doth it deserve condemnation to call our brother foole but not to bee angry with him Answ 1 First the Papists answer here affirmatively both in generall that there are some sinnes in their owne nature mortall and some veniall and in particular that the last sinne mentioned in this verse is mortall the first to wit Anger is but veniall and therefore of his owne nature deserveth not everlasting condemnation which is onely due unto the last to call one Foole ſ Bellarm. de Purga lib. 1. c. 4. Secondly Thomas of Aquine likes the generall Answ 2 allowance of the distinction of mortall and veniall sinnes but dislikes the particular application thereof unto this place holding that this Anger which is here spoken of is a deadly sin in that Christ saith He that is angry with his brother is guilty of judgement which words must be understood De motu tendente in nocumentum c. of a motion tending to hurt where there is consent and so that motion is deadly sinne Thom. in opuscul Ex Lippom. Answ 4 Fourthly the distinction of sinnes veniall and not veniall in their owne nature in
respect of the greatnesse or smallnesse of the sinne is not to bee admitted and that for these reasons 1 In respect of the nature of sinne which of it selfe deserveth death Rom. 6.23 The wages of â—â—ne is death Yea sinne is the transgression of the Law 1 John 3.4 And every transgression of the Law is under the curse Gal. 3.10 2 In respect of the infinite Majesty of God which to violate can be no veniall sin of it selfe 3 In respect of the perfect and absolute righteousnesse of God which cannot abide the least blemish or imperfection And therefore in these regards no sinne committed against God can in it selfe be veniall t White s Exod. 20. Confut. 5 â—rac 6. f. 330. Fifthly this motion and passion of anger even when it is sudden and unadvised though there be no further purpose nor intendment to Answ 5 hurt is guilty of judgement as is plaine in this verse Whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be guilty of judgement that is shall be guilty of damnation for so judgement is taken in Scripture David prayes that the Lord would not enter into judgement with him u Psa 143.2 And Paul saith Thou that judgest another condemnest thy selfe v Rom. 2.1 where to judge and condemne are taken for all one to be culpable then of judgment is to be guilty of condemnation Thirdly we admit this distinction of veniall Answ 3 and mortall sinnes if it be understood not in respect of the nature of sinne but of the quality of the persons for unto those that beleeve and repent all sinnes are veniall and pardonable through the mercy of God Rom. 8.1 But to the wicked and impenitent all their sinnes are mortall Sixthly the Fathers side with us in our opinions Answ 6 holding that all these three sinnes here mentioned are mortall yea the Papists generally make anger whereof the principall question here is one of the seven deadly and mortall sinnes as Canisius Pupilla oculi Manipul Curatorum and the rest Chrysostome upon this verse saith Christus dat ultionem homicidio irae supplicium aeteruum adulterio concupiscentiae Christ doth not punish murder and spare anger or condemne adultery and acquit concupiscence but condemnes and punishes both the one and the other St. Augustine s saith that all these three are to be arraigned before Gods judgement-Seate where Hell shall be the reward of all If any object why then are the two former degrees Iudgement and Councell named Hee answers because there are severall degrees of punishment in hell according to the degrees of sinne on earth Saint Hierome condemnes the first degree of anger to be worse than idle words but these we must give account for at the day of Judgement when and where no sinnes that we must answer for are in their owne nature pardonable w Mat. 12.36 Saint Hilarie Non minus ira rea Evangelie quam homicidium lege Anger under the Gospel is no more a veniall sinne than murder was under the Law And therefore I shut up this question with this assertion That to be angry with our brother unadvisedly to call him Racha or foole in our anger are all mortall sinnes and deserve in their owne nature eternall fire Bellarmine tom 3. fol. 113. objects Object to bee angry with our Brother or to call him Racha doth not exclude us from the Kingdome of heaven and therefore they are not mortall sinnes The Antecedent he proves thus That which is not properly a precept but onely a degree of a precept cannot exclude us from the Kingdome of Heaven but to be angry with our Brother or to call him Racha is not properly a precept but onely a degree of that Commandement Thou shalt not kill Therefore this will not exclude us from the Kingdome of Heaven First here is Petitio principii a begging Answ 1 of the question hee taking it for granted without proofe that these two to call our Brother Racha or to be angry with him are no precepts which is the thing questioned Secondly if this were granted that these two were onely degrees of that Commandement Thou shalt not kill yet it would not hence follow that they are veniall sinnes which will not exclude us out of Heaven For to call our Brother Foole is but onely a degree of that Commandement and yet the Jesuite himselfe doth confesse that to be mortall and to deserve condemnation Bellarm. de Purgat lib. 1. cap. 4. tom 1. 1809. Answ 3 Thirdly because they are degrees of the precept as is confessed by the Cardinall therefore it cannot be denied but they must belong unto the violation and transgression of the Commandement and consequently deserve death because cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the Booke of the Law y Galath 3.10 There being no transgression so small but it shall be punished except it be repented of and washed away by the Blood of Christ Answ 4 Fourthly the Jesuite doth diametrally oppose Christ even in the very scope of the place Bellarmine saith the violation of the Commandement it selfe according to the letter excludes us from the Kingdome of Heaven but not the transgression of the degrees of the Commandement Christ here saith plainely that the Pharisees and Scribes did observe the Letter of the Law but that was not sufficient to bring them unto Heaven or to preserve them from Hell And therefore if we desire to be saved we must carefully observe the very degrees of the Commandements and therein our righteousnesse may exceed the righteousnesse of the Scribes and Pharisees because otherwise wee cannot enter into the kingdome of God Sect. 4 § 4. Whosoever is angry with his Brother Quest 1 Why are all Christians forbidden to bee angry Answ 1 First because Anger comes from the Divell as the authour thereof Give no place to wrath give no place to the Devill Ephes 4.27 Answ 2 Secondly because anger comes from our inbred corruption and pride of heart Non ab illius injurià sed a tuà superbia Basil hom de ira Anger proceeds not from the injury of others but from the pride of our selves that being the moving cause thereof Many are wronged and yet but some are provoked and some are not Why because some are patient and others are proud Now we should labour not onely to withstand the assaults of Satan but also to subdue our owne corruptions and pride and impatiencie in the suffering of injuries because these are the causes of Anger Answ 3 Thirdly Anger is forbidden us in regard of a three-fold pernicious effect thereof namely First it pleaseth not God Iam. 1.20 Those which are in the flesh cannot please God Rom. 8.8 But Anger is a worke of the flesh Gal. 6.20 And therefore cannot please God Secondly Anger is dangerous and pernicious to him that is angry for it hurts the heart it wounds the conscience it expels the holy Spirit and deserves to be
diversitie of sinnes but another kinde of punishment beside eternall it sheweth not For Iudgement a Counsell and Hell fire doe but signifie three degrees of the same punishment Hell fire being due to the rest but added onely for distinction to shew both the difference of the sinne and punishment Answ 2 Secondly Iudgement 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken in Scripture for everlasting punishment or condemnation as Roman 2.3 How shalt thou escape the Iudgement of God And therefore Bellarmines consequence is nought He that is angry shall be guiltie of judgement therefore not of hell fire for Iudgement signifies the punishment of ever-burning Tophet Thirdly Saint Paul sayth No rayler shall inherit Answ 3 the kingdome of God 1 Cor. 6.10 But he that sayth Racha to his brother is a â—ayler wherefore hee that sayth Racha shall not inherit the kingdome of heavens The Minor proposition is thus proved Racha is an Hebrew Interjection and is derived from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Raiak evacnare and is read by the Thalmud 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Inavis vacuus that is a light head or cock-braine wide and emptie of wisedome or understanding Now hee that thus reviles his brother railes upon him and therefore if Saint Paul may bee beleeved hee that calles his brother Racha shall not inherit the kingdome of heaven § 8. Whosoever shall say thou Foole. Is it Sect. 8 not lawfull then at all to call any Foole Quest 1 First it is lawfull for God to call wicked men Answ 1 fooles Prov. 12.6 and for Christ to call the two Disciples foolish Luk. 24.25 yea for Saint Paul to brand the Galatians with folly Gal. 3.1 and plainly to call the Cretians Liers and Slow-bellies Titus 1.12 Secondly this place is to be understood of Answ 2 them which charge men with folly with a mind to reproach them by way of revenge we must not call any foole in anger hatred or contempt because as was formerly sayd Christians must looke upon all men as their brethren and our Saviour sayth here plainly thou must not in anger call thy brother foole Doth the abuse of the tongue deserve hel fire Quest 2 or destroy the soule First Pomerius saith Convitia reprochfull Answ 1 words are veniall sinnes when they are thus qualified I. When they are given by superiours by way of correction or reproofe II. When they proceed not from hatred but from the levity of the mind III. When they proceed from a light or small anger and from unbridled or immoderate rage IV. When they procced from no desire of disgrace that is although a man use some reprochfull and disgracefull words unto his brother in his anger yet doth it not with a purpose or intent to disgrace him V. When by the reprochfull words which are given our brother is not much disgraced Secondly Pomerius saith Maledicta evill Answ 2 speeches and maledictions are but veniall sins when thus occasioned or uttered viz. I. When they proceed from a good cause or from some calling from God II. When they are pronounced against or reflect upon him onely who hath deserved to be evill spoken of III. When they are occasioned for a trifle a matter of no great moment IV. When they are from a sudden undeliberated heat of passion These respects thinkes Pomerius doe so allay and qualifie the poyson of the tongue that it wil not prove mortall unto us Thirdly we have a more sure word of prophecy Answ 3 to resolve and establish us in this particular then the opinion of an erring Papist and that is the word of God which teacheth us what to thinke or judge of rayling reproachfull and cursed speeches by these particulars First the Scripture commands us if wee desire to approve our selves to have put on Christ to put on the vertue contrary unto these Put on therefore as the elect of God bowels of mercies kindnesse humblenesse of mind meekenesse long suffering forbearing one another and forgiving one another p Coloss 3.12.13 All these are contrary or opposite to reproaches and evill speakings and therefore if the one bee commanded then is the other forbidden if one bee an argument of an elect vessell the other is of a reprobate at least for the present And therefore whether simply taken or according to Pomerius his qualifications and restrictions they are no veniall sinnes Secondly the Scripture prohibites these ex consequenti by a necessary consequent Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth but that which is good c. That you grieve not the Holy Spirit of God q Ephes 4 21. Now none will deny but that reviling and wicked speeches are corrupt communication at least tend not to edification but rather offend God The Apostle seemes plainely thus to argue those speeches which are corrupt and edifie not the hearers are displeasing to the pure Spirit of God and become not Christians but rayling reviling and reproachfull speeches are corrupt and tend not to edification and therefore they are unbeseeming Christians and displeasing to the Holy Ghost and consequently in their owne nature lethall and not veniall Thirdly the Scripture dislikes all speeches of this kind because they argue that there is neither grace in us for the present nor hope of glory for the time to come I. That man who gives way to these abusive speeches doth thereby testifie that his heart is not seasoned or sanctified with true grace If any man seeme religious and bridleth not his tongue he deceiveth his owne heart and his religion is in vaine r Iam 1. â—6 II. That man is as yet no heire of glory Be not deceived for raylers and revilers shall never enter into the kingdome of God Å¿ 1 Cor. 6 10. I conclude this particular with this plaine syllogisme That which excludes us both from grace and glory is mortall and not veniall but rayling reviling and reprochfull words not being repented of exclude us both from the possession of grace and true hope of glory therefore they are no veniall sinnes Fourthly these are directly and positively forbidden by God in his word and therefore are no veniall sinnes in their owne nature Lay aside all malice envy and evill speakings saith Saint Iames t 1 Pet. 2.1 and Saint Paul most plainely Let all bitternesse and wrath and anger and clamour and evill speaking be put away from you u Ephes 4.31 Having shewed that rayling and reprochfull words are Quest. 3 mortall sinnes it may hence be further demanded why the abuses of the tongue doe destroy the soule and must bee punished with Hell Fire Answ 1 First because the tongue was given unto us for other ends speech is onely given unto men and that for this end that thereby they might performe those dueties which God requires of them viz. to wit First wee must blesse and praise God with our tongues Jam. 3.9 Secondly wee must confesse Christ with our tongues Rom. 10. Thirdly wee must invocate and supplicate the
and the effect the sinne and the punishment the one being blotted out he will remember the other no more How doe we owe the debt of obedience unto Quest 6 God First wee owe it out of duty Because the Answ 1 Lord For this end hath I. Created and made us Ephes 2.10 Rom. 9 21. We were made men for his service II. Redeemed us that we might serve him in righteousnesse and true holinesse Luke 1.74 Tit. 2.14 III. Elected us and predestinated us unto the adoption of sonnes that as children wee might obey him i Ephes 1.4 IV. Called us that wee might obey him in sanctification and honour 1. Thess 4.7 V. Enlightned us that wee might increase in his service 2. Corinth 3 18. VI. Sanctified us in Christ that as members of Christ wee might performe his will Ephes 5.27 Answ 2 Secondly we owe obedience unto the Lord by command God hath given us a Law to obey and Christ hath renewed it Ephes 4.24 Wherefore S. Iames cals it the Law of liberty Iames 1.23 Now this command is that wee should serve him in Righteousnes towards man and Holinesse towards himselfe and that all our dayes Answ 3 Thirdly we owe obedience unto God for his benefits which wee daily receive from him Answ 4 Fourthly we are debters unto God by covenant and contract And that both First in Baptisme wherein wee promised fealtie and new obedience unto the Lord. Secondly in our profession and vocation unto Christianity as we are Christians wee have promised to put on Christ and serve God as the members of Christ all our dayes Thirdly in our daily Prayers wherein we make new promises unto God of new obedience Fourthly in the Sacrament of the Lords Supper wherein wee receive a pledge from God which is as a seale of that covenant which is made betweene us and God Quest 7 Is every man obliged to pay this debt unto God Answ Every man is obliged either to the debt of obedience or to the punishment of sinne whether they be Heathens or Christians or great men or the inferiour and ruder sort or prophane persans or ignorant or servants or children yea every one of what nation ranke or quality soever Sect. 2 § 2. Forgive us Obiect 1 Some object this place against the certaintie of remission thus Wee are here taught to pray for the pardon of our sinnes day by day al which were needlesse if we could be assured of pardon in this life and therefore there can bee no certaine assurance that our sinnes are remitted Answ 1 First this fourth petition must bee understood not so much of our old sins as of our present and new sinnes for as wee goe on from day to day so we adde sinne to sinne and for the pardon of them wee must humble our selves and pray Answ 2 Secondly wee pray for the pardon of our sinnes not because we have no assurance thereof but because our assurance is weake and small wee grow on from grace to grace in Christ as little children doe to mans estate by little and little and therefore we pray daily for more The Papists say Argu. that a man by good workes is justified Against this wee thus argue from this place Our Saviour teacheth every man though never so just to pray forgive us our sinnes And therefore no man is just by his workes To this Bellarmine answers Answ This petition of the Lords Prayer is to bee understood onely of veniall sinnes which are mixed with our good workes Bellar. de Iustif. lib. 6. cap. 20. resp ad loc 5. First the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Debts so that Reply 1 herein wee pray to have all our debts forgiven now wee are more endangered and endebted unto God by great sinnes then by small And therefore veniall sinnes onely are not here meant Reply 2 Secondly S. Luke readeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sinnes and S. Iohn defineth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sinne to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 transgression 1 Iohn 3.4 But great sinnes are transgressions of the Law more then veniall Therefore they are not excluded Thirdly if good workes be tempered with Reply 3 veniall sinnes how can they being imperfect make us just and perfect before God But of this more by and by The Papists say good workes are meritorious Object 2 and satisfactory and from this Verse goe about to prove that Prayer satisfieth for sinne wee pray saith Bellarmine for forgivenesse of sinnes and by thus praying we satisfie for our veniall sinnes The Lords Prayer overthroweth their doctrine of satisfaction wee therein concluding Answ for thine is the glory wee take not the glory to our selves but ascribe all unto God Forgivenesse of the debt is of mercy where then remission is of grace there can bee no satisfaction of worthinesse Stand all sinnes in need of remission art not Quest 1 some veniall and pardonable of their owne nature First the Papists say some sinnes are veniall Answ 1 and that either I. Of their owne nature because they are not ontra legem sed praeter legem Dei against the Law of God but besides it as the hatred of our enemie in some degree or not to be silent when an Elder commands and the like Or II. for the littlenesse and smallnesse of the sin because they are not equall to eternall death neither deserve it l Staple◠Antid Evang Secondly the Papists agree but jarringly amongst themselves in this particular some saying Answ 2 they are veniall sinnes because they are not against the Law of God some saying that they cannot properly bee called sinnes thus Bellarm. Thirdly that which is not Answ 3 Contra legem Dei against the Law of God is not sinne For the Law is the Rule both of good and evill And every sin is sin in as much as it is a violation the Law Answ 4 Fourthly what is lesse then the eating of an Apple Gen. 3 then an idle word Mat. 12.36 Then a corrupt thought Gen. 6.5 And yet these are threatned with judgement and punishment Answ 5 Fifthly because Stapleton saith these sins are not paria aeternae morti that is there is no resemblance analogy or proportion betweene these small sins and eternall death I adde therefore this one answer more That there is a parity resemblance and equality I. In the affection of the person offending who would for ever have given way to these if he had lived II. In the person offended who is an infinite God And III. In the choise of sin before life eternall And IV. In the guilt and staine of sin because it can never be blotted out by time or torment Object 3 The Fathers speake of veniall sins and the Scripture of mortall And therefore some are veniall Answ Sinne is called veniall or mortall foure manner of wayes namely First comparatively as a sin which is lesse evill Thus there are seven deadly sins as the Schoolmen say which are greater then a sin of ignorance because
that is excusable In tanto non in toto in part but not altogether Secondly in respect of the person sinning which is either I. Elected but not as yet regenerated now such a ones sins are all veniall in the event because they shall bee pardoned 1. Tim. 1.13 II. Regenerated and justified whose sinnes shall not bee imputed Hence David pronounceth such a one blessed Psalme 32.1 And S. Iohn saith such have an Advocate for their sinnes 1. Iohn 1.9 2.1 Hence sinne is sometimes said not to bee theirs Rom 7. Yea not to be sinne 1 Iohn 1.3.9 and 5.18 Thirdly in respect of the infallible danger so S. Iohn saith there is a sinne not unto death 1. Iohn 5.16 Where we may observe that sin is called Mortall for which we must not pray and that a sinne not unto death whose danger is not so great as that is Fourthly in respect of the merit that sin is called veniall which in the severity rigor and strictnesse of justice doth not deserve death And thus no sin is called small in all the Scripture Are all sinnes equall Quest 2 First the Stoicks affirme it and Christians Answ 1 who assent unto them herein thus confirme it I. Because sin doth not consist in the matter of the action but in the mind Sin is a prevarication and straying from the truth and right way The sin is alike to sinke a Ship by over-lading her either with Sand or Gold Thus the Stoicks the following reasons are produced by the Christians II. Because every sinne is a violation of the Law yea of the whole Law for hee who is guilty of the breach of one is guilty of all Iames 2.20 Therefore all are alike III. Because the same punishment is allotted to him who workes wickednesse and to him who consents onely thereunto Romans 1.32 IV. Because the action and cogitation are both alike before God to commit adultery actually and with the heart to kill and to hate as also of other sins Matthew 5. Are alike in the sight of God And therefore all sins are equall Secondly although sin differ not Answ 2 ab extrà differt intrà without yet it differs within to wit that sin which is committed through ignorance negligence and infirmity is lighter and lesser then that which is committed maliciously wittingly and of set purpose Againe many are worse then one Againe hee sins worse who sins against a greater measure of grace And therefore thus all sins are not equall Thirdly one sin differs from another ab extra Answ 3 even in regard of the outward act Thus the murder of a King or of a Father is much more horride then of a stranger enemie or private person Thus blasphemie against God is greater then contumely or reproch against our neighbour Thus it is a greater sin to rob a poore man then one who hath no want Fourthly certainly there is an inequality in the Scripture And that Answ 4 I. Of glory 1. Corinth 15. II. Of punishment Matth. 10.15 11.22 Of both which else-where III. Of sin there beeing a difference betweene anger Racha and foole as was shewed in the former Chapter vers 22. so Iohn 19.11 Fifthly we distinguish betweene the Nature of sin which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the transgression of the Law and is the same in all sins without any difference hence all are mortall even unto idle thoughts Degree of sin which is aggravated principally by these circumstances viz. First from the mind and heart and internall purpose if it bee done with inward boasting or a perverse will Answ 5 Secondly from the neglect of greater power strength and grace Thirdly from the number many sins being heaped together Fourthly from the time when sin is long continued in Fifthly from the person when it is committed against God And thus although all sins have one and the same nature as all Individua partake of the nature of their Species yet in regard of the degree of sin we say that those sins are greater which are committed wittingly and willingly then those which are committed ignorantly and with reluctation against them Those which are committed by a man of more grace strength and knowledge are worse then the infirmities of the weake Those in whom are legions of Divels and sins are worse then those who are given but to one sin as the young man Mat. 19.22 Those who continue in sin are worse then he who fals but once Those who sin immediately against God worse then those who sin immediately against man Quest 3 Are all sins pardonable because wee are taught here to pray for pardon against all Answ 1 First all sins are pardonable except the sin against the Holy Ghost Answ 2 Secondly the Papists seeme to grant this that the sin against the holy Spirit is unpardonable but yet they acknowledge that it is not so irremissible as though it did exceede the mercy of God if they could but repent but because God gives them over unto a reprobate sense and with holds from them the assistance of his Spirit whereby they might bee restored But in this point first Scotus is faulty who will not fully acknowledge the truth of it And Secondly Camara l Camara quaest coâ—cil et expos quae 175. Pag. 191. è Catharino erres here who saith onely that this sin is very hardly and very seldome pardoned Now the reason of this their error was twofold Namely I. Because they placed this sin in any act simply without those requisite circumstances thereof which follow by and by II. Because they stretched this sin beyond its bounds making six kinds thereof contrary to the six effects of the blessed Spirit which are these First trust and confidence in God Secondly the feare of God Thirdly the knowledge of the truth Fourthly joy for the aide of the Spirit towards our Brethren Fifthly a sorrow for sin Sixthly a purpose to repent Whose opposite is Desperation Presumption A resisting of a known truth Envy for graces blessings endowments which God hath bestowed upon our Brethren Gloriation or boasting in sin An obstinate purpose of continuing in sin Answ 3 Thirdly unto this sin against the Holy Ghost three things are required to wit I. Illumination Read those two places Heb. 6.4 10.26 If they have bene enlightned and have had a tast c. And againe if after wee have had a knowledge of the truth c. Thus there must be a knowledge of our duty and an opening of the eyes of our understanding before this sin can be committed II. A Relapse and falling away yea a returning unto impurity Read Heb. 6.6 2. Peter 2.1.20 21 22. Matthew 12.45 Unto this sin there must be a turning with the Dog to his vomite and with the Swine which was washed to the wallowing in the mire III. Malitious presumption or a hatred of Christ when a man shall deride contemne spurne trample under his feet and blaspheme Christ his Word Law and truth Religion
how can yee speake good things when yee your selves are evill that is as Lyranus interprets it yee being filled with malice and envie against me cannot speake any good of me The good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth good things and the evill man out of the evill treasure of his heart bringeth forth evill things Anselm upon these words hath this Observation or Exposition Quomodo bonus homo non possit proferre mala nec malus bona sic non possit Christus mala nec diabolus bona opera facere As the good man cannot bring forth evill things nor the evill man good things So Christ can doe no bad workes nor the Devil any good Reade further for the proofe hereof Mat. 7.16 17 18 19. and Luke 6.43 44. From whence plainely this Argument may be drawne No corrupt and evill tree can bring forth good fruit But every man by nature is a corrupt and evill tree being the child of wrath and infected with sinne And therefore no man by nature or by the onely power of his Free-will is able to bring forth good fruits Sect. 3 § 3. A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth good things Quest 1 What is a good thing or a good worke Answ Good workes are generally thus described They are actions externall or internall conformable and agreeable to the will and to the Law of God But from this verse they may be thus defined They are workes which flow and proceed from a disposition of vertue For the good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth good things Quest 2 How many things are required unto a good worke Three things are required viz Answ First a good beginning that is the will well disposed and working out of true vertue For goods fruits cannot spring but from a good tree verse 33. Secondly a good matter or object that is something which is commanded by God for otherwise it will bee but will-worship as Matth. 15.6 In vaine doe they worship me teaching for doctrines the commandements of men Thirdly a good end that is the glory of God and those things which tend to his glory 1 Corinth 10.31 And thus if we desire to approve our selves to bee good men by our good fruits we must labour that I. Our wils may be rectified and rightly disposed And II. That our workes may be moderated according to the word of God in regard of the matter of them And III. That our end in all our good workes may be that God may be glorified in us and by us Verse 36 VERS 36. But I say unto you that every idle word that men shall speake they shall give account thereof in the day of Iudgement Object Bunderius a Papist from this place would prove Purgatory thus Men at the day of Iudgement shall give an account for every idle word which they have spoken Now which is this day of Iudgement certainely that day which comes presently after death according to that of the Apostle It is appointed unto all men once to die and after death comes Iudgement Therefore in that day after death men shall give an account of those things which have beene culpable and worthy of reprehension in them and which must bee expiated by temporall punishments now in what place can this be but only in Purgatory His meaning is this As soone as ever men die they shall give an account for their veniall and lesse sinnes which they have not satisfied nor suffered for on earth and those shall be purged by the paines and penance of Purgatory flames First Sophister-like he concludes that which Answ 1 hee proves not or hath that in the conclusion which is in neither Proposition For to me hee seemes to argue thus We must give an account for all our small sins Answ 2 at the day of Iudgement But this day of Iudgement is the time which followes presently after death Therefore there is a Purgatorie perhaps to punish such a Logician as hee is Secondly wee grant that by and by after death there is a particular judgement of God wherein every one shall give an account of those things which he hath done in the body Thirdly by the day of Iudgement both Franciscus Answ 3 Lucas and Gorranus and divers others understand the last day and generall Iudgement and some leave it doubtfull Sa Iudicij scilicet particularis in morte vel universalis that is by this Iudgement is either meant the particular Iudgement presently after death or the general Iudgement at the last day Now wee need not greatly care which of these say true for if the last day be here understood then Bunderius his Argument or Sophisme rather is absurd for there will bee no Purgatory after the day of Iudgement But if wee leane unto those who hold the place doubtfull then it will prove but an uncertaine Argument and consequently not an Argument of faith nor to build an Article of faith upon as Purgatory is to them A question may hence be demanded Quest whether every sinne be mortall of its owne nature or not Although it be true Answ that all sinnes are not equall but one greater then another and although also it be true that in a good and godly sense some sinne may be termed mortall and some veniall which yet may more fitly be called sins regnant and not regnant yet it is most true that every sinne is mortall of its owne nature and only veniall by way of Gods free acceptation and mercy for his owne names sake and merits of his deare Sonne our Lord Iesus as appeares by these reasons First because our Saviour here saith that wee must give a straight account of every idle word in the generall day of Iudgement and this is certaine because every idle word is flatly against the Law of God and yet these idle words are those sinnes which they call veniall And therefore this is a truth that all sinnes are mortall that is against the Law of God Secondly because the Rhemists Rhem. in 1. Iohn 3.4 confesse in plaine termes that every sinne is a swarving from the Law of God For doubtlesse that which swarveth from the Law is truely said to be against the Law but not agreeable to the Law Thirdly because the famous popish Friar and Romish Bishop Iosephus Angles in 4. sent pag. 215. teacheth the same doctrine in his booke dedicated to the Pope himselfe His words are these Omne peccatum veniale est al cujus legis transgressio Patet quia omne veniale est contra rectam rationem agere contra rectam rationem est agere contra legem naturalem praecipientem non esse a regulà rectae rationis deviandum Every veniall sinne is the transgression of some Law This is cleare because every veniall sinne is against right reason and to doe a thing against right reason is to doe it against the Law of nature which commandeth us not
to depart or swarve from the rule of right reason Thus every veniall sin is against right reason and against the Law of nature which is given to every one in his creation or in his birth and nativity Of this same opinion is Durandus in 2. sent dist 42. q. 6. and many of the Schoolmen Iosephus Angles in 2. sent pag. 275. and Fisher the Bishop of Rochester Rossensis Artic. 32. advers Luth. and Bellarmine unawares confesseth the same against himself Bellar. com 1. pag. 84. If the Reader would see the severall testimonies and words of the fore-quoted Authors and this Argument cleerly handled let him reade Master Bels Challenge pag. 81 c. unto 86. Fourthly Gerson de vita spiritual lect 1. part 3. in 1. corol hath these words No offence of God is veniall of its own nature but only in respect of Gods mercy who will not de facto impute every offence to death though he might do it most justly And so I conclude that mortall and veniall sins as they be such are not distinguished intrinsecally and essentially but onely in respect of Gods grace which assigneth one sin to the pain or torture of death and not another This Gerson who thus writeth was a famous Popish Bishop and a man of high esteem in the Councell of Constance and if his words be well marked they are able to confound the Papists and to confirm the point delivered by us For I. He telleth them plainly that every sin is mortall of its own nature And II. That no sin is veniall save onely in respect of Gods mercie And III. That God may Iustissimè most justly condemn us for the least sin we do And IV. That mortall and veniall sins are the same intrinsecally and essentially and differ but accidentally that is to say they differ in accident but not in nature in quantity but not in quality in mercie but not in deformity in the subject but not in the object in imputation but not in enormity save onely that the one is a greater mortall sin than is the other Fifthly because the least offence that can be imagined remaining eternally in respect of the stain and guilt of it though not in act as do all sins unremitted must be punished eternally for else there might some sinfull disorder and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 remain not ordred by divine justice Now whersoever is eternity of punishment there is an everlasting expelling and excluding from eternall life and happinesse and consequently every offence that eternally remaineth not remitted excludeth from eternall glory and happinesse and is rightly judged a mortall and deadly sin Field of the Church lib. 3. pag. 147. Sixthly all sins are mortall in them who are strangers from the life of God because they have dominion and full command in them or at least are joyned with such as have and so leave no place for grace which might cry unto God for the remission of them But the elect and chosen servants of God called according to purpose do carefully endeavour that no sin may have dominion over them and notwithstanding any degree of sin they run into they recover that grace by repentance which can and will procure pardon for all their offences VERS 37. For by thy words thou shalt be justified Vers 37 and by thy words thou shalt be condemned What is Justification Quest 1 First some say Iustificare to justifie signifieth Answ 1 Iustum facere to make just by a renovation or change of our nature but this is false for hereby our Justification and our Sanctification are confounded and made one thing as though to justifie were the action of God in regenerating and re-creating us Secondly to justifie is the work of God in Answ 2 judging us and therefore Iustificare to justifie doth signifie Iustum pronunciare that is to pronounce righteous and this is manifest by these two reasons namely I. Because in Scripture Justification is opposed to condemnation as in this verse By thy words thou shalt be justified and by thy words thou shalt be condemned II. Because in Scripture Justification is sometimes defined to consist in the remission of sins sometimes in the forgiving of wickednesse sometimes in the covering of sin and not imputing of iniquity and sometimes it is described by the imputation of righteousnesse All which do prove manifestly that Justification is the action of him who is the Judge of mankinde in absolving man from sin and the punishment thereof Who is it that justifieth man God alone as appears by these two particulars Quest 2 to wit First the Lord is the onely Judge of all Answ therfore it belongeth onely unto him to justifie He is called the Judge of all Heb. 12.23 And Act. 17.31 it is said He hath appointed a day in which he will judge the world in righteousnesse Of which day also the Apostle speaketh Rom. 2.5 16. And the reason hereof is given by the Apostle Rom. 14.7 8. to wit because he is our onely Lord to whom we both live and dye and to whom every one shall give account of himself Whereby it is cleer seeing God is the onely Judge of the world that to justifie and to condemn must onely belong unto him Secondly Justification consisting in the remission of sins and the not imputing of iniquity it necessarily followeth that none save God onely can justifie because none except the Lord can forgive sin as is cleer Mark 2.7 Luke 5.21 and Esa 43.25 and 44.22 and Psal 31.2 and 2 Corinth 5.19 Verse 38 39 40. VERS 38 39 40. Then certain of the Scribes and of the Pharisees answered saying Master we would see a sign from thee But he answered and said to them An evill and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign and there shall no sign be given to it but the sign of the Prophet Ionas For as Ionas was three daies and three nights in the Whales belly so shall the son of man be three daies and three nights in the heart of the earth Sect. 1 § 1. There shall no sign be given to it but the sign of the Prophet Ionas Quest What and how many things may we learn from this sign Christ that is from his death and Resurrection Answ 1 First from hence we may learn how great and horrible the pollution and guilt of sin is and how great the severity of divine justice is seeing that God would rather give his onely begotten and most dearly beloved Son to death than let sin go unpunished Answ 2 Secondly in this sign we may see more than a fatherly goodnesse and mercie in God for as a father hath pity upon his children so hath the Lord upon us Psal 103.13 yea he spared not his own and onely naturall son but gave him to death for us Rom. 8.32 that we might be freed from eternall destruction by him Answ 3 Thirdly from hence also we learn that there is no other way or means for us to obtain salvation by
Altar although it is frequent with the Fathers to call the death of Christ Sacrificium crucis the sacrifice of the crosse and St. Peter saith 1 Peter 2.24 That CHRIST bare our sinnes in his owne body on the tree and St. Paul saith Colos 2.15 Having spoiled principalities and powers he made a shew of them openly triumphing ever them in it that is in the crosse And the same Apostle saith That he will glory in nothing save in the Crosse of CHRIST and Bellarmine when he had accurately handled all the things which belong unto a Sacrifice he can find nothing to make an Altar of but the Crosse But the Crosse is not an Altar properly so called for the crosse and the Altar differ in their very ends and scope for the crosse is ordained for punishment and the Altar for sacrifice Thirdly we answer those things which are required Answ 3 unto a Sacrifice are of two kinds to wit I. Some things belong unto the very essence and nature of a Sacrifice And II. Some things belong unto the solemnity decencie and comelinesse of a Sacrifice Now an Altar doth not belong unto the first sort but unto the second and therefore there may be a sacrifice without an Altar Fourthly we answer that usuall and ordinary Answ 4 sacrifices have Altars properly so called but it doth not hence follow that therefore the sacrifice of CHRIST must have such an Altar because it was a transcendent and not an ordinaty sacrifice Christ himselfe being both the knife oblation altar and Priest Vers 20.21 VERS 20.21 Who so therefore shall sweare by the Altar sweareth by it and all things thereon And who so sweareth by the Temple sweareth by it and him that dwelleth therein Quest Whether is it lawfull to sweare by the Saints or by other creatures Answ They take the name of God in vaine which doe sweare by any other then by the name of God and therefore the Rhemists in hunc locum erre who maintains swearing by the name of Saints The truth of this answer appeares evidently by these particulars viz. First God commandeth that we should sweare onely by his Name Deut. 6.13 and 10.20 Exod. 23.13 Secondly God reproveth those which sweare by any other then by him as Zephan 1.5 Thirdly Invocation belongeth onely unto God but the taking of an oath is a kind of invocation therefore it is a service due onely unto God Fourthly in taking of an Oath we call God to be a witnesse unto our Soule but God only knoweth the secrets of the heart and neither Angell nor Saint nor any other Creature and therefore we are to sweare by none but God onely Fifthly hee that sweareth giveth unto him by whom he sweareth power to punish if he sweare falsly but God onely is able to punish the Soule Matth. 10.28 And therefore we must sweare onely by him Object Against this the Rhemists object thus It is lawfull to sweare by the name of Saints because all is referred to the honour of God as he that sweareth by the Temple sweareth by him that dwelleth therein Answ 1 First in this place CHRIST reproveth the Pharisees for their Swearing and condemneth it by this argument that howsoever they thought it a small matter to sweare by the Temple yet in effect they did sweare by God himselfe And thus he doth not here justifie swearing by Creatures but confuteth that nice and unwise distinction of the Pharisees who taught That it was nothing to sweare by the Temple but by the gold of the Temple verse 16. CHRIST here shewes that they could not avoid swearing by God when they did sweare by the Temple because it was the place of his habitation and so they did in such an oath take the name of God in vaine And thus we see the boldnesse of our Rhemists who dare justifie swearing by creatures by the same reason that CHRIST condemneth it Answ 2 Secondly our Saviour here saith nothing but this that in every oath there is an invocation of the divine power and therefore whosoever sweareth by a creature committeth idolatry in making it his God Answ 3 Thirdly if our Saviour should here allow of swearing by Creatures as by heaven saying He that sweareth by heaves sweareth by the throne of God he should be contrary to himselfe for elsewhere he saith Sweare not at all neither by heaven for it is the throne of God Matth. 5.34 VERS 23. Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees hypocrites for yee pay tithe of mint and annise and cummin and have omitted the weightier Vers 23 matters of the Law Iudgement Mercy and Faith these ought ye to have done and not to leave the other undone What things in generall were tithe able amongst the Jewes Quest First their yeerely encrease was either cattell Answ 1 fruits of the trees or fruits of the Land now of all these they payed tithes even to mint annise cummin as is cleare from this verse Secondly after many corruptions in the Church of the Iewes many things became questionable whether they were citheable or no whence the high Court of their Sanhedrim decreed That in the things doubtfull which they termed Demai though they paid neither first nor poore mens tithe yet they should pay a second tithe and a small heave offering namely one part of an hundred Moses Rotsens fol. 199. Colum. 3. Now mint annise and cummin seeme to have bene of these doubtfull things in which though the decree of their Sanhedrim required but one in the hundred yet the Pharisees would pay a just tenth as appeares by this verse whence it was that they boasted That they gave tithes of all that they possessed Luke 18.12 In which they out-stripped the other Iewes who in these payments tooke the liberty granted them in the Sanhedrim VERS 24. Yee blind guides Vers 24 which straine at at a gnat and swallow a Camell Bellarmine Lib. 2. Cap. 1. de Peccato produceth this place for the proofe of Veniall sinnes Object reasoning thus Some sinnes are compared to things which are most light in their owne nature and some to things most heavy Some compared here to Gnats and some to Camels and Luke 6. some to motes some to beames and therefore some are veniall some mortall First these are proverbiall speeches and therefore Answ 1 are not to bee extended beyond the scope of CHRIST Secondly that which is a gnat or a mote comparatively Answ 2 may be a great mountaine positively hence the earth is great and large absolutely but in comparision of the heavens it is but like a point And therefore this followes not some sinnes are small in comparison of others therefore they are so small and veniall in their owne nature that they doe not deserve eternall condemnation Bellarmine himselfe I know would confesse if he were alive that simple fornication were but a small sinne in comparison of poysoning and murdering the Pope and Cardinals and Clergie of Rome and burning to ashes the whole Citie but from
punished Fructus ira lingua effraenis manus incontinentes contumeliae accusationes verbera z Basil hom de Ira. the fruits of anger are an unbridled tongue a quarrelling hand reproaches accusations stroakes and the like whence our Saviour reputes it murder in this place how lightly soever Bellarmine esteemes it Doe all the Papists thinke Anger a veniall Quest 2 sinne The more ancient Papists were otherwise minded Pomerius dom 5. Answ Pentec expounds these words thus He that is angry shall be guilty of judgement that is he shall be accused before God at the day of Judgement because hee hath sinned against that Commandement Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy selfe He that saith to his Brother Racha shall be in danger of the Councell that is the whole Congregation of the Saints will approve the sentence of his condemnation The same Author doth there for the better clearing of his exposition observe eight degrees of anger wherein there are some things amisse which I passe by because he speakes plainly and abundantly enough for the proofe of what wee affirme against Bellarmine The first degree of anger is provoked through zeale either towards God or against sinne and this is good as followes by and by The second degree is a sudden motion and disturbance of the minde which saith he is not sinne The third is a deliberated anger but quickly blowne over this saith he is a veniall sinne in it selfe Fourthly Anger joyned with some small desire of revenge or with a desire of some small revenge this also saith hee is veniall by reason of the smallnesse of the desire of revenge The fifth degree is when Anger is accompanied with a will and desire of some great vengeance but yet is concealed within in the heart comming no further neither shewing it selfe in the countenance or actions this he saith and that truely is mortall The sixth is when internall anger conceived and for a while concealed in the heart doth at length breake out revealing it selfe by some signes as for example either 1. by some frowning and lowring and discontented looke Or 2. by turning away the face from the party we are angry with all Or 3. by not speaking unto them Or 4. by not re-saluting them when by them we are saluted The seventh degree of anger is conjoyned with some reproachfull words as Foole or Asse this also saith he truely is a mortall sinne The eighth and last degree is Anger accompanied with some reall harme done unto those with whom we are angry this is also a mortall sinne And thus by his sixth seventh and eighth degree of Anger he doth plainly shew that all the three degrees of anger laid downe in this verse are mortall sinnes And therefore we should carefully avoid and abstaine from all prohibited Anger By what wayes or meanes may we resist and Quest 3 withstand this passion of anger The remedies against Anger are either in Others that is not to provoke us either by opprobrious words or injurious workes But this not being meant in this place I passe it by In our selves which are these which follow namely First Premeditation before thou beginne to bee angry ponder with thy selfe I. all the provocations reproaches injuries and wrongs which may bee offered unto thee that so thou mayest prepare thy selfe to contemne and despise them and not to bee exasperated by them II. Ruminate with thy selfe what thy duty is and how thou oughtest in patience to possesse thy soule notwithstanding all crosses and wrongs which may bee offered unto thee that thus thou maist arme thy selfe against them III. weigh with thy selfe what Christ suffered for thee and with what patience he suffered contempt derision injuries yea death for thee and in them all was like a lambe dumbe before the shearer or as a dove without gall And therefore remember this that thou maist imitate thy Master herein These premeditations being frequently and seriously in our hearts will be one excellent remedy against Anger Secondly suppresse it within give no place to the water nor to the fire of wrath as soone as ever an angry motion ariseth in thy heart nippe it at the roote that like Ionas his gourd it may suddenly wither Thirdly remember how unprofitable anger is it hurts thy selfe it harmes others but is gainefull to none Fourthly observe the excesse immoderate rage and anger of others marke how ill it becomes them yea how it doth disgrace them looke upon angry men as the Lacedemonians made their children behold drunkards that detesting it in another thou maiest avoid it in thy selfe Fiftly imploy thy selfe about some honest and lawfull affaires that thy mind may be taken off from the provocations unto anger Otio crescunt pathemata Sixtly accustome thy selfe to prudence and wisedome remember how thou oughtest to shew thy selfe to be a wise man yea a Christian endued with patience and heavenly wisedome and cloathed therewith as with a garment Colos 3.12 Iames 3.17 that so thou maist acquite thy selfe like a wiseman in all provocations injuries and wrongs whatsoever Sect. 5 § 5. Without a cause or unadvisedly Quest 1 What is the meaning of these words Answ 1 First they may be expounded subitò Hee that is angry with his brother suddenly or causually not willingly incensing himself unto wrath against his brother but rashly overcome by a Observ 1 sudden passion of anger Teaching us that Christ doth not only condemne in us voluntary and deliberated Anger but also rash sudden and harsh anger For he that is hasty of Spirit exalteth folly Pro. 14.29 Answ 2 Secondly they may be expounded sine causâ Hee that is angry with his brother without a just cause as if our Saviour would say Anger is not to be blamed when it springs from a good root or is moved and provoked by a good cause Teaching us that Anger is to be judged according Obser 2 to the moving cause thereof Or Anger is commendable if it proceede from a good cause Be angry but sinne not Esay 4.26 therefore there is a lawfull anger How may we know whether our Anger bee Quest 2 commendable or culpable Two things in anger are observable First Radix the roote therof from whence it springs that is the internall affection or irascible facultie as it is naturall and lawfull without any hypothesis moved against the sinne committed without any displicency or hatred of the sinner of this more plainely by and by Secondly the branches or the anger it self which is either Evill which is twofold namely Or First immoderate and excessive of this we spake § 4. Secondly unjust and is either When wee desire our owne revenge Or When wee are angry for our owne gaine or losse Good which springeth either from a cause Civill Ira cos fortitudinis I meddle not with this Spirituall which First is allowable and warrantable religion not prohibiting all anger for first this were impossible And Secondly it is sometimes profitable a Chrys sup for
cap. 7. and Reuchlin in lib. 1. Cabalae pag. 456. and Otho Gualtper syllog pag. 81. 82. 83. This place is strongly urged by Peltanus Object and Bellarmine lib. 1. cap. 1. and lib. 2. cap. 6. de Purgatorio and divers others for the proofe of Purgatorie Some of them briefly arguing thus If in the world to come the first and second degrees of anger here expressed shall not be punished with hell fire and yet shall bee punished with some torments then it remaines that they must bee punished in Purgatorie because after this life there is no other place of punishment but either hell or Purgatorie Bellarmine and Peltanus they dispute thus First our Saviour speakes here of punishments which are to be enjoyned unto and inflicted upon sinners by the judgement and sentence of God after this life Secondly that there are here distinguished by Christ three sorts of sinnes and three kindes of punishments and that hell fire and eternall condemnation is attributed onely to the third kinde and to the first and second more light punishments that is temporall And therefore some soules shall be punished after this life with temporall punishments to wit in Purgatory because there is no other place of punishment after death but either hell or Purgatory First wee grant that our Saviour speakes Answ 1 here of punishments which shall bee inflicted upon sinners by the judgement and sentence of God after this life But it followes not from hence that hee speakes of the temporall paines of purgatorie Chamier tom 3. fol. 1160. de Purgat cap. 6. Sect. 3. lib. 26. Scharp curs Theolog. de Purgat pag. 557. resp 2. Secondly wee deny that there are three distinct Answ 2 sorts or kindes of sinnes or punishments but rather three degrees of punishment in hell which although they bee unequall yet are all eternall as evidently appeares by these reasons First every transgression of the Law is sinne and the wages of every sinne is death Rom. 6.23 and 1. Ioh. 3.4 But to be angry rashly and to raile are transgressions and consequently sins as was shewed before And therefore in themselves are worthy of everlasting death Secondly he that loveth not his brother abideth in death that is hath no eternall life i 1 Ioh. 3.14.15 But hee that is angry with his brother unjustly loveth him not therefore he hath no part in eternall life Thirdly no raylers shall inherit Gods kingdome that is without repentance k 1 Cor 6.10 But he that sayth to his brother Racha that is idle-braine or light-head raileth therefore this sinne without repentance excludeth from heaven and consequently in it selfe is worthy of hell Willet Synops 408. Fourthly Christ speaks here of the sinne not of the punishment for to bee angry with our brother and to harme him with some opprobrious words is the fault of the sinne not the punishment thereof but every fault and guilt of sinne not pardoned doth bring upon the sinner eternall condemnation as shall elsewhere be shewed And therefore all these three degrees of sinne are guiltie of hell fire Fiftly Christ concluding this discourse commands every one to be reconciled unto his brother lest he be delivered unto the Judge and by him sent into prison from whence hee shall not come out untill hee have payd the uttermost farthing that is never as shall bee shewed by and by And therefore although there be divers unequall degrees of punishment in hell yet all are equall in regard of the eternitie and perpetuitie thereof Chamier de Purgat fol. 1160. § 5. Answ 3 Thirdly an Argument drawne from a Metataphor similitude or a resemblance is not to be stretched or urged beyond the scope or intent of him that propounds it But Christs scope here was to correct the false interpretations and expositions of the Decalogue the Pharisees restraining the transgressions of the Law onely unto the outward and more weightie commissions and acts and therefore our Saviour teacheth them that those sins which they account light and veniall as to bee angry with their brother or to reproach him by some disgracefull words are indeed great and mortall sinnes deserving hell and damnation it selfe Scharp de Purgat fol. 557. resp 2. Sadeel pag. 258. error 2. Answ 4 Fourthly if our Saviour speake here of Purgatorie where he represents divers judgements or jurisdictions of the Jewes whereof some were superiour some inferiour as the Judgement Councell and great Synedrion then it would follow hence that there are many severall jurisdictions in Purgatorie and appeales from the inferiour Judges to the superiour as was in them But this is so absurd that I never heard nor read Papist maintaine it and therefore I could wish they would thinke Purgatory it selfe as grosse Answ 5 Fifthly neither of these words Iudgement or Councell can in any respect agree or be applyed to Purgatory there not being in them the least mention or insinuation of any purging more than there is in the word Gehenna Amesius tom 2. pag. 201. Answ 6 Sixtly from this place they must either prove two distinct Purgatories or none at all for Bellarmine himselfe observes two kindes of punishments distinct from the eternall torments of hell fire And therefore if this argument bee worth the owning or maintaining he must grant two Purgatories distinct in place and situation For as the Councel is a distinct place and jurisdiction from the place of the fire of Hell as he saith so also is the place of Judgment a distinct place frō the Synedrion or Councell And therefore if the Papists contend for this that the Synedrion or Councell differs from the fire of Hell wee doe no lesse strive for this that in like manner Judgement differs from Councell and so cannot be numerically one Wherefore either they must goe set up a second and new Purgatory from this place or pull down the old one which they have so stoutly heretofore maintained from hence because this Scripture we see must either support two Purgatories or none Seventhly if this conclusion of the Papists be Answ 7 good our Saviour speakes of punishments after this life because mention is made of Hell fire then this will follow also that he speakes of the punishments of civill judgements or Courts in this life because he makes mention of a Judgement and a Councel which belong unto this life and are not in Purgatory and therefore if this be absurd and deformed so is also the former being both cut by one Last Eighthly what Fathers can they finde who Answ 8 interpret this place of Purgatory Theophilact upon these words by councell understands the consent of the Apostles in the great and generall judgement And Saint Augustine de serm Dom. in monte from this place concludes that there are different degrees of punishment in Hell Ninthly to prove Purgatory from this place Answ 9 cannot stand with some other opinions of the Papists and therefore if they could prove Purgatory hence yet they would lose
of light But if thine eye bee evill thy whole body shall be full of darkenesse If therefore the light that is in thee be darkenesse how great is that darkenesse § 1. The light of the body is the eye c. Sect. 1 The Papists say Argu. that in men there is Liberum Arbitrium a malo ad bonum a freedome of will by which we may both doe good and abstaine froÌ„ evill Amongst many other arguments our men urge this verse arguing hence from the corruption of the understanding In man Liberum arbitrium proceedes from the understanding and wil which are faculties of the humane soule And therefore it is necessary that Free-wil Liberum Arbitrium should be such as the the understanding and will is The Argument is drawne from the understanding which is now corrupted in this manner If the understanding of man be evill then mans Free-will is not good If Free-will be not good then neither is it free from evill But the former is true therefore also the latter The consequence is plaine of it selfe but more evidently appeares from this verse The light of the body is the eye c. Which place all Interpreters acknowledge to be metaphoricall drawne from the light of the body unto the light of the minde see Chrysostome Iansenius and Lucas Brugensis sup The Antecedent namely that the understanding in all men naturally is corrupted vitiated depraved and obscured is thus confirmed from these places to wit I. From verse 23. If thine eye be evill c. Now that the eye is evill appeares from Luke 4.18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me and therefore hath the Lord sent mee to preach the recovering of sight to the blind and therfore it appeares that all men without Christ are blinde as Cajetane well observes upon those words II. From Mat. 4.16 The people who sate in darkenesse saw a great light where we see the state and condition the Galileans were in when Christ came to dwell amongst them so Luke 1.79 III. Hence salvation in and by Christ is described to be a freedome from darkenesse ye are called that you might shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkenesse into his marvellous light Col. 1.13 Thus without Christ all men are in darkenesse IV. Out of Christ all men are darkenesse Ephes 5.8 ye were darkenesse c. which darkenesse was wrought in us by Sathan 2 Cor. 4.4 If the Reader desire to see a further fuller and more ample prosecution of this Argument I referre him to Chamierus De libero Arbit lib. 4. cap. 3 Tom. 3. pag. 88. Sect. 2 § 2. If thy eye be single thy whole body shall be full of light Object The Papists hold that the workes of the righteous be perfect and Bellarmine De justific lib. 6. cap. 15. hopes to prove it from this verse arguing thus If thy eye be single thy whole body shall be light And Luke 11.36 for I joyne them as hee doth both together If thy whole body bee full of light having no part darke the whole shall be full of light as when the bright shining of a candle doth give thee light In these places is described a worke perfectly good both substantially intentionally and circumstantially both in regard of the matter intention and all the other circumstances For Oculus simplex the single eye is a good intention and Corpus Lucidum the light body is the good worke Now such a worke our Saviour pronounceth to bee full of light having no part darke But if such a worke bee a mortall sinne of his owne nature as the Lutherans say then it should be all darke For as an evill intention so any other fault or defect makes a worke evill although it be in his owne nature and kinde good Wherefore some certaine workes of the regenerate are so good that they are exempted and freed from all sinne defect fault and obliquity whatsoever First Bellarmine concludes extra thesin that Answ 1 which is not in controversie for wee doe not dispute whether the good workes of the regenerate be sinne in their owne nature for this none of us doe say and therefore he falsely ascribes this to the Lutherans but whether they be sinne by accident or not that is through the corruption of the workeman And this indeed we say that by reason of the contagion of our nature there alwaies adheres something to our best workes which of its owne nature is evill vitious and contrary to the law of God and consequently in the rigour severity of Gods judgement is mortall and deadly But we acknowledge that the good workes of the regenerate in their owne nature that is as they proceed from the grace of God within us and his Spirit assisting us they are good holy and pleasing unto God Secondly his consequence is naught Christ Answ 2 describes a worke perfectly and in every respect good Therefore the workes of the regenerate are such is a grosse and absurd conclusion We must not from hypotheticall and conditionall propositions collect categoricall and absolute conclusions for that is done without booke If thy eye be single thy whole body shall be full of light this is true but this proves not that the eye is so or if that were granted no more would follow from hence then this that all those actions which proceede onely from the mind were pure for the clearer taking up of this answer I lay downe these Propositions First in the law of God the Lord doth both Proposi 1 prescribe and describe workes perfectly good yea it is contrary to the nature of the law to admit of imperfection the law injoynes us to love the Lord with all our heart with all our soule and with all our strength in which words is described a worke perfectly good and so our Saviour in the places objected may give us an Idea of a worke full of light having no part darke in it Secondly although the law perscribeth and Proposi 2 describeth workes perfectly good yet it followeth not hence that any workes of the righteous are such When it is said that Philosophy is Amor sapientiae a love of wisedome the perfect nature thereof is described But we must not hence presently conclude that the Philosophy of Socrates or Plato or Aristotle was perfect Thus Christ saith not that any man hath a single eye or a body all light but speakes hypotheticâ—â— si fuerit If there be a single eye Thirdly by the eye is meant the mind which Proposi 3 is enlightned and healed by the grace of the holy Ghost Fourthly although we should grant that the Proposi 4 mind were perfectly enlightned and that all the actions of such a one were light in as much as they proceed from the grace of regeneration yet to those actions cleaves something which doth not proceed from this regenerate minde but from the corrupt and unregenerate flesh for that hath alwayes in it some darknesse and vitiousnesse
510 b c. Scribes See Pharisees Scripture Speech Word Word of God Divers singular questions concerning the definition nature markes division necessity writing reading translation use abuse excellency contents exposition power certainty infallibility utility perspicuity purity and Author of the sacred Scriptures and word of God pt 1. fol. 1 2 3 4. 29 b. 30 a. 46 b c. 100 b. 101 a. 103 a. 104 b c. 105 106 107 a. 175 a. 245 a. 331 b. 347 a. 396 b. 397 a. 399 a. 492 a. 500 b. 512 b. and pt 2. folio 34 b. 46 a. 94 a. 137 138. 149 b. 285 a. 312 b. 388 a. Who are enemies to the word of God pt 1. folio 100 b. How many wayes the Scripture speaks and how we may understand what it speakes pt 1. folio 213 214 c. How the word is a seed pt 2. fol. 141 b. 142 a. All are not happy who enjoy the word Part 1. folio 446. Three sorts of wicked words and speeches pt 2. folio 329 a. All our words are observed by God and what words he observes pt 1. folio 350. 521. Scrip. What is meant by Scrip. pt 2. folio 15. Secrets What is meant by this word Secret and who reveale secrets and what is required of us in regard of secrets pt 2. fol. 146 b. Security Divers questions concerning the nature division and causes of security and remedies against it Pt. 2. fol. 317 318 319. Seed What is meant by feed and how many things are observeable therein pt 2. fol. 141 â— 142 a. Seeke What Seeking imports and how many seekers there are pt 1. folio 350 b. 399 b. Why many who seeke Christ find him not and how we must seeke pt 2 f. 171 b. and Pt. 1. fol. 525 a. Selfe-deniall See Deniall Separatists See Anabaptiâ— Sepulchers See Buriall Serpent The nature of Serpents and wherein they may be imitated and wherein not pt 2. f. 21 b. 22 23. Servants Service Divers profitable questions concerning the service and servants of God and Christ pt 1. fol. 320 b. 332 333. 338. 469 a. and pt 2. f. 55. 103 b. The duty of faithfull servants pt 1. folio 469 a. and pt 2. fol. 330 b. Sheepe Why and wherein we should be like Sheepe pt 2. folio 169. 357 b. Shekel There was a double Shekel pt 2. folio 365 b. Sicknesses See Diseases Shooes What Shooes the Apostles must not provide pt 1. folio 15. Sight See Illumination Silver See Gold Simony Against Simony in Patrons of livings pt â— folio 13 a. Simplicity How many sorts of Simplicity there are and wherein good Simplicity doth consist pt 2 folio 23 b. 24 a. Sincerity Wherein sincerity consists and what things are common to the hypocrite and sincere Professor pt 1. fol. 163 a. and pt 2. folio 135 b. Sinne. Sinners Questions concerning the nature author defence hatred pollution power evill easinesse strength and punishment of sinne and remedies against sinne and impediments hindring us from turning from sinne pt 1. folio 58 a. 100 b. 103 a. 113 b. 394 b. 395 396. 409 a. 410. 467 b. 468 b. 489. and pt 2. fol. 2. a. 66 b. 212 213. 301 b c. and pt 1. folio 520 b. Questions concerning our freedome and ascension from sinne Pt. 1. fol. 19 a. 59 b. 129 b. 410 a. and pt 2. folio 45 b. 67 b c. Questions concerning the distinction of great and small veniall and mortall sinnes Pt. 1. folio 185 b. 196. 200 a. 310 b. 311 312. and pt 2. folio 83 b. 84 a. 129 â— c. 274 a. 299 b. The Devill makes all sinne to seeme beautifull unto us pt 1. folio 103 b c. The first sinne of all was Pride pt 1. folio 140 b. How our sinnes are to be borne pt 2. folio 100. Whence it is that men more clearely see other mens sinnes then their owne pt 1. folio 393 394. Sinne is often committed in the performance of good workes pt 1. f. 394. a. How many sorts of Sinnes there are Pt. 1. fol. 408 b. Why we must resist the least and first beginnings of Sinne. pt 1. fol. 342. Sinne is like unto a Feaver and to the Palsie and Leprosie See Feaver Leprosie Palsie Why Christ is said to have come of Sinners or sinfull Progenitors pt 1. fol. 9 a. Questions concerning the sorts and punishments of sinners and how grace is ordinarily wrought in great sinners and the comfort of penitent sinners pt 1. fol. 58 b. 356 a. 409 410 a. 480 481 b. 487 a. and pt 2. fol. 101. 213 b. 220 b. 274. 281. Reliques of sinne in the best Pt. 1. fol. 467. Sitting To Sit. What is meant by sitting pt 1. fol. 116 b. Why Christ sate when hee Preached Pt. 1. f. 134 b. Sleeping To Sleepe How many wayes men are said to sleepe Pt. 2. fol. 143 b. 144 a. Society See Company Sonnes See Children Sorrow See Compunction Souldiers Warre Warfare Whence it is that a Christians life is a Warfare pt 2. folio 50. How manifold our Spirituall Warfare is and who are Christian Souldiers pt 2. folio 50. When Warres are lawfull pt 1. folio 246 a. Soule Wherein the soule excels the body pt 1. folio 342 b. Divers and sundry errours and erroneous opinions concerning the soule pt 2. folio 125 b. 151. 179 b. 180 a. 198 a. 254. 258 a. 380 b. Specters See Spirits Speech See Scripture Spirit Holy Ghost Spirits Specters Spirituall things Questions concerning the names titles Deity Offices person operations comforts and consolations of the holy Spirit Pt. 1. folio 81 b. 82. 144. and part 2. folio 96 b. 116 b. 117. 138. 291 292 293. Questions concerning spirituall things pt 1. folio 254 a. 271 b. 343 a. 401 a. Why men naturally abhorre Spirits and Specters pt 2. folio 155. What is meant by this word Spirit pt 1. folio 138 b. 139. and pt 2. folio 392 a. What is our duty in regard of the motions of the Spirit in our hearts pt 2. folio 305 a. 329 a b. How the workes of spirituall and morall men differ pt 2. folio 350 b. Staffe What staves the Apostles must not have pt 2. folio 15. Star re See Comet Stones How God raised up children of stones unto Abraham pt 1. folio 73 a. What is meant by these words Command these stones to be made bread pt 1. folio 96 b. Strife See Contention Subjects We must be the Subjects of Christ and performe the duty of subjects Pt. 2. folio 103 b. 296 297. Subordination Why it is evill to suborne others pt 2. folio 372 b. Subsidies Taxes Tribute These are to be payed to Princes pt 1. folio 248 a. Succour See Helpe Sunne Questions concerning the Sunne pt 1. folio 256 a. 257 a. 258 a. Superiours The duty of all superiors pt 2. folio 119 b. Supper of the Lord. See Eucharist Suspition The division and prohibition of suspition pt 1. folio 424 b. and pt 2. folio 121 b. Sutes in Law Questions Cautions and
not at things which are seene but at things which are not seene l 2 Cor. 4.18 Where wee may observe that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is so to looke as the Archer looketh to the marke hee that beholdeth a woman thus hath an adulterous eye yea the word here used 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not onely to looke with the eye but with the heart signifying more then 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for this onely signifies the beholding of an object simply which way a man may behold a woman without sinne but that signifies the intention of the minde which goes along with the eye and thus to behold a woman with the sight of the eye and the lust of the heart as evill is here forbidden If the sight of the eye be thus dangerous and readie to conveye lust unto the Quest 2 heart is it not then good to plucke out or put out our eyes First some of the Heathen knowing how unruly the eye was have pulled out their eyes Answ 1 thinking them most happy who were so blinde of which minde was Seneca when he said Nonne intèlligis partem foelicitatis nostroe esse coecitatem It addes no small deale unto our happinesse that wee are blinde Secondly these were mistaken for Christ requireth not this of us to plucke out our bodily Answ 2 seeing eyes but to pull out our sinfull eye in the next verse that is to take lust from our eye which is a Member of our sinfull body and then the eye of it selfe is a good member of the body § 2. Hee that looketh upon a woman to lust after hath committed adulterie with her already Sect. 2 in his heart Quest It is questioned here by many Whether the uncleane desires of the heart bee a breach of this Commandement thou shalt not commit adultery or of the last Thou shalt not covet Answ 1 First some of the Fathers have thought that the uncleannesse of the heart doth not belong unto this seaventh Precept God doth not by this Commandement cut off the sinfull thoughts but the sinfull act said Gregor in Ezech hom 13. Yea Augustine also is of this opinion That in this seaventh Commandement the worke of uncleannesse onely is noted but in the tenth the very concupiscence m Aug. in qu 71. in Exod. Answ 2 Secondly the inward sanctimonie and purity of the minde is here commanded and the contrary forbidden as appeares by these particulars First by the definition of puritie and chastitie which is to be holy both in body and spirit thus Saint Paul describeth a true Virgin n 1 Cor. 7 34. And thus he exhorts us to bee o 1 Thes 5. â—3 Secondly both the soules and bodies of thâ— faithfull are the Temples of the Holy Ghost and therefore ought to be kept holy p 1 Cor. 3 16. Thirdly Chrysostome urgeth these foure reasons I. From the interpretation of our blessed Saviour who sheweth that this Commandement is broken in the very inward lust and concupiscence in this verse II. From the analogie and correspondencie which it hath with other Commandements To bee angry with our brother without a cause is a breach of the precedent Commandement Thou shalt not kill So to desire a strange woman though the act of concupiscence follow not is against this Precept III. In respect of God who doth not so much looke to the worke of man as to his heart IV. Because concupiscence is the cause of adulterie all adultery proceeding from concupiscence q Mark 7.21 Chrysostom hom 12. in Mat. And therefore seeing the effect that is adultery and outward uncleannesse is forbidden in this Precept it followeth also that the very cause thereof which is concupiscence should be restrained Sect. 3 § III. Whosoever shall looke upon a woman c. hath committed adultery with her Quest 1 Why doth our Saviour here ascribe Adultery to the eye and a wanton looke Answ 1 First because the sence provokes unto act as the Apostle saith he plants and Apollo waters unto good 1 Cor. 3.6 So we may say the eye plants and the tongue and speech waters unto impurity and uncleannesse Secondly because the eye is the most quick Answ 2 sense ut vidi ut perij sometimes a glade of the eye brings a glance to the heart which sets on fire the whole course of nature Observe here that a man hath two eyes to wit I. Oculus informans the right eye whereby sometimes he casually beholds a woman this is not simply condemned as was shewed before § 1. II. There is Oculus depascens the left eye which delights in the beholding of beauty and is never glutted therewith this is faultie and here forbidden as was shewed before Indeede the first sight is sometimes a baite and proves at last mortall as we see in Evah whose sight of the Apple cost the world deare r Gen. 3.6 afterwards the sight of women caused those sinnes that at length brought the Dleuge Å¿ Gen. 6.2 The sight of Dinaâ— cost the Shechemites their lives t Gen. 34.2 And the sight of Joseph unto his Mistresse brought her to forget all woman-hood u Gen 39.7 And Davids eye first casually beholding Bathsheba occasioned adultery subornation to drunkennesse and murder Thirdly because the beholding of beautie Answ 3 is evill and doth pollute in it selfe if it be with delight and desire after it And hence in the law the brother and sister were to be cut off if they saw and did contemplate that is willingly and with delight one anothers nakednesse v Levit. 20.17 And therefore with Iob we should make a covenant with our eyes and not give way to alascivioâ—s looke What lookes must we principally avoide Quest 2 There is a three-fold aspect of women Answ namely First there is Visus solicitans a sight which perswadeth and counselleth unto evill and this is wicked Solomon saith He winketh with his eyes w Pro. 6.13 that is he laboures by wanton lookes winkes smiles and the like to seduce and allure These as absolutely wicked are to bee avoided Secondly there is Visus ruminans a pleasing and delightfull looke this Solomon forbids Let not thine eyes behold strange women x Pro. 23.33 And his father David telleth us it is a vanitie and therefore we should turne our face from it y Psal 119.37 This is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the very thing which is here forbidden Noli aspicere quod non licet concupiscere Doe not looke earnestly upon that which it is not lawfull for thee at all to covet Bern. Oculus impudicus impudici cordis nuntius Augustin Such lookes are often the fore-runners of unchaste actions and doe presage an unchaste heart Thirdly there is Visus casualis an accidentall or casuall aspect this is not evill in it selfe yet even in this wee must be warie and watchfull and not let our heart goe along with our eye § 4. To lust
makes us cold but by and by wee burn So at first we are afraid of sin by and by fearlesse therof at first our affections freez afterwards fry in the love of sin at first wee abstain from sinne and are hardly drawn to the committing of sinne but by and by custome makes it habituall and naturall unto us and us insensible of it III. In a Feâ—er when we are cold yet even then we are hot within though we are not so sensible of that heat So even then when the naturall man fears and trembles to commit sin there is the fire of evill concupiscence which in time sets on fire the whole course of nature shews it selfe outwardly in the practise of sin IV. The Fever inflames the whole body even to the very toes of the feet So sin wounds and enfeebles us from the crown of the head to the solâ— of the foot Esay 1.6 Answ 4 Fourthly siâ—ne may be resembled to a Fever Respectu effectuum in regard of the effects For I. The Fever in membris in the parts of the body workes this effect it debilitates and weakens the whole man so that hee cannot walke forth of doors nay bee cannot walke within his owne house neither is able to stand but forced to sit or lye and keep his bed So by sinne we are so weakned that wee are neither able to walke in the wayes of God nor run the race that he hath set before us nor worke out the work of our salvation with fear and trembling II. The Fever in intellectu in the understanding works this effect it disturbs takes away the use of reason making a man not know what he saith or doth And this is for the most part or at least very often mortall and deadly So when men grow obstinate and bold in sinning and are neither sensible of sinne nor punishment but will do whatsoever they will Ier. 44.16 it is an argument of a soule not distant from death III. The Fever In appetitu in the appetite produceth these effects namely First it loaths the most wholsome things So sinne makes us to loath both I. Good workes and duties and exercises of religion like the Iews who cryed when will the new Moons and the Sabbaths be done that we may return unto our sins Malach. 1.13 II. Good Counsell for that we think to bee a hard saying and we cannot endure it Ioh. 6.60 Secondly as the Fever loaths that which is wholsome so it longs for that which is unwholsome So wee loath the heavenly Manna of the word and spirituall graces and love the vaine pleasures of sin although they be but for a season and the end therof destruction and death Rom. 6.23 Thirdly In a Fever there is a thirst not to bee quenched or satisfied but insatiable having no moderation in drinkiâ—g if it can come unto liquor So many are furious in sinning and cannot cease to sin h 2 Pet. 2.14 although they see oftentimes that I. The thing is childish and of that nature that it is a shame for a man to be besotted therewith Yea II. That the event is perillous and dangerous And III. That both the estate is lessened and impaired and the body enfeebled and enervated therby Thus no feverish man is more mad after drink then wicked men are after their sins Fourthly Potus factitij made drinks quench not the thirst in a Fever but now pleaseth the Pallat and by and by displeaseth it it being only cool things which allaieth and asswageth the heat therof although often they kill because the stomack is not able to bear them So it is not ordinary comforts that appease the soule because they cannot fill the soule neither can they allay the heat of a wounded spirit but it is the word and the comminations and promises thereof which afford ease and peace to the troubled heart And yet sometimes this cooling Cordiall doth kill and drives accidentally to desperation as we see in Cain Gen. 4. and Iudas Mat. 27. Fifthly sinne may be resembled to a Fever Respectu finis in regard of the end thereof For I. Sometimes it ends in health and life of it selfe that is a man recovers sometimes out of a Fever without the use of any means or help of any man II. Sometimes the Fever ends in health and life by the use of good means and the helpe of the Physician III. Sometimes the Fever ends in a sickly and weakly estate that is when the Fever leaves a man oftentimes he fals into deafnesse and swellings and boyls and the like IV. Sometimes it ends in death Fevers often bring men to the period of their life now this is two-fold viz. First sometimes a Fever brings a man to a speedy death when he dies therof Secondly sometimes it brings a man unto a lingring death and that either I. By an Hâ—ctick Fever which inflames the heart or lungs Or II. By bringing a man into a Dropsie Now to apply this First sinne herein differs from a Fever this as was said sometimes ends in health and life without the use of physick or helpe of the Physician but never that for sin cannot be cured or healed of it selfe Secondly sin is cured and healed by Christ who is the only Physician of the soule Thirdly if sinne end not thus in health and life by Christ then it ends either I. In a dry Hectick Fever and a barrennesse of all good fruits Or II. In a cold Dropsie or Lukewarmnesse in Religion Or III. In a deafnesse and unwillingnesse to hear the word of God Or IV. In filthy Vlcers and putrified Boyls of actuall transgressions V. The safest Crisis or conflict of nature in this sicknesse is evacuation and that either by vomiting purging sweating or bleeding So we must labour either to vomit up our sinnes by Confession or sweat them out by Contrition or purge them out by alienation and separation or else if the Lord love us he will bleed us and make us forsake sin by affliction as hee did by David and Manasses Quest 2 How may we know whether we are sicke of the Fever of sin or not By these plain signes namely Answ First if without thou be inflamed with the lust of sinne or if it shew it selfe in in thy life and actions Secondly if the fire of concupiscence kindle thy affections unto evill although as yet it doth not appear by thy actions and outward man Thirdly by examining what drink pleaseth us best whether is the word of God unpleasing to our taste or not câ—rtainly if we be refreshed and comforted with the pleasures of sin and that the word of God relisheth not with us we are feverish Fourthly by examining whether Christ hath cured us or not whether we be freed from the Fever of sin or not For this Fever of the soule differs from the bodily Fever there being many in health of body and free in body from the corporall Fever but none at all from the Fever of
things are observable viz. First the sum of it wherein is shewed First what the creatures have The Foxes have holes The Birds have nests Secondly what Christ hath not The Son of man hath not where c. Secondly the Application of it in these words Iesus saith unto him And therefore although they be first in shew yet they are last in the order of nature which order I here now observe Our Saviours answer to the Scribe seems to be not pertinent and indeed it doth not hansomly square with the words of the Scribe but with his minde meaning and understanding most properly which Christ shews is not hid from him but as he hears the words of the mouth so hee sees and knowes the thoughts of the heart whence we may learn Observ That Christ knowes the secrets of the heart Psalme 7.9 Zach. 4.10 Heb. 4.12 13. Quest How doth it appear that Christ sees the secrets of the hidden man of the heart Answ 1 First because he made the heart Psal 33.15 Answ 2 Secondly because he is true God and this is Gods Royall Prerogative Ier. 17.9 10. Answ 3 Thirdly it is clear that he sees the heart because he is angry and threatens to punish for the sins of the heart and inward man Ier. 16.16.17 and 17 10. and 32.19 Vers 21.22 VERS 21 22. And another of his Disciples said unto him Lord suffer me first to goe and bury my Father But Iesus said unto him follow me and let the dead bury their dead Sect. 1 § 1. And another of his Disciples said unto him Quest 1 What is meant by this word Disciple Answ 1 First commonly this name Disciple is attributed to the twelve selected Apostles Answ 2 Secondly sometimes it is given to the seventy Disciples Answ 3 Thirdly sometimes for all those who purposely followed him I dare here determine nothing positively but only say with Beza that this was none of the twelve but whether hee was one of the seventy or not I know not Quest 2 Why doth not Christ reject him and let him go as well as the Scribe Answ 1 First some answer because he was his Disciple one of his servants and family Answ 2 Secondly but I conceive that this Scribe which Christ suffers to depart was one of his Disciples also at least outwardly because it is said here Another of his Disciples said unto him c. which seems to imply that this Scribe whom Christ answered was one of his Disciples also Quest 3 If both these were Disciples then why doth Christ detaine the one and dismisse the other Answ Observ Because he would whence we may learn That salvation depends upon the mere mercy and free grace and dispensation of God Reade Iames 1.18 and Titus 3.5 and Rom. 9.18 and verse 15. and Exod. 33.19 Luke 17.34 Yea our disposition unto good is not the cause of Gods love towards us but the effect Sect. 2 § 2. Suffer me first to go and bury my Father Quest 1 What doth this Disciple desire of Christ Answ Leave to depart hee seemes to be of a good and honest heart because Christ recals him and retains him and yet hee begs temporall things before spirituall From whence we may observe Observ 1 That there are Reliques of sinne remaining in the Regenerate Rom. 7.23 25. and 2 Corinthians 12.8 9. Quest 2 Why hath God left the remainders of sin in his children Answ 1 First sometimes to prove and try us whether we will strive to hate them and expel them or not Exod. 20.20 Iudg. 2.22 Secondly sometimes to humble us that having Answ 2 such strong enemies and reliques within us wee might never be puffed up but stand in awe and fear 2 Chron 32.25 Thirdly alwayes to exercise us God would Answ 3 not have Adam idle in Paradise but he must dress the Garden Gen. 2.15 Much lesse must wee be idle in this wicked world and therefore that wee may be alwayes employed the Lord hath left us enemies that wee might bee the more watchfull and carefull over our selves and more couragious against our enemies Reade Iob 7.1 and Ephes 6.12 c. 2 Tim. 4.7 c. Heb. 12.14 and 1 Pet. 2.11 And therfore the best and al the Saints have their duties required of them as long as they live namely I. To weed and root sin and vice out of their hearts And II. To hold fast what they have whether grace or strength against sin Revel 2.11 And III. To labour daily to grow and increase in grace and strength more and more For how long time did this Disciple aske Quest 3 leave to be gone Only for a small time Answ but untill hee could bury his Father and yet Christ would not permit it To teach us that we must not absent our selves Observ 2 from Christ not for a small time but must labour to be present with the Lord continually either in our words by speaking of him or in our hearts by thinking of him or in our works by serving of him Why must wee never depart from our Lord Quest 4 Christ First because in Negative Precepts we are obliged Answ 1 Semper ad semper we must never doe any thing which is forbidden us as long as we live Secondly because we are alwayes in danger of Answ 2 sinning and can bee frâ—e no longer then we stick close unto him the occasions of sinne occurre daily and wee shall daily fall into sin except Christ protect us And therfore we must be carefull never to forsake him Must we never sin at all this is too strict May Quest 5 we not take liberty sometimes unto evill First sinne is poison and therfore as a man Answ 1 must not once take a draught thereof no more must hee sinne once for one Cup of poyson is mortall to the body and one sin to the soule Secondly sinne is a Serpent and therefore if Answ 2 it can but get entrance with the tip of his tayle hee will wind in his whole body Suggestion unto evill being harboured brings a man often times at length to finall impenitency Why did this Disciple desire to depart Quest 6 To bury his Father Answ Whether was his Father dead as Chrysostome Quest 7 thinkes or onely aged and decrepite as Gualter imagines and also Calvin Whether was hee Mortuâ—s or Moribundus It matters not much whether Answ seeing the Scripture herein is silent although I rather thinke the latter If his Father were dead was it not a good worke to bury him and if he were old was it Quest 8 not well done to attend upon him and to comfort him why then is it not granted Answ 1 First certainly children are to honour and tender their aged Parents Levit. 19.3 Prov. 23.21.22 and it is an unchristian thing not to bury the dead Answ 2 Secondly but the comparison is here whether we must forsake Christ or Parents and from our Saviour we are taught to contemne Parents in respect of Christ Answ 3
the taste that it makes the sicke man refuse all good meat and medicine yea this sinne doth not onely disinable a man from doing good but makes him decline from the right rule and disorder and deprave himselfe more and more for they sinne not only simply out of malice but out of malice and that de industria What are the remedies against this sin or rather Quest 7 the meanes to preserve us from it First let us watch against all sinne yea against Answ 1 all beginning of evill Ephes 4.27 Hebr. 3.11 As those who feare the plague fly farre from the house infected therewith Secondly let us highly prize the presence and Answ 2 grace and operation of the Spirit for if wee so doe then we shall not reject him neither be rejected by him but if wee contemne and despise him then he will give us over unto strange delusions 2 Thess 2.10 11. Thirdly let us learne to esteeme and value Answ 3 Christ above all things and then wee shall not sleight the Gospel but thinke it a joyfull and blessed message Fourthly if with Peter wee have fallen Answ 4 then let us with him labour speedily to recover our selves As the most deadly poyson becomes not mortall if it be suddenly evacuated or purged out or vomited up So the greatest sin becomes not damnable if by and by with teares and sighes wee repent us of it Fifthly while our spirits are something soft Answ 5 and mollified with the sight and sense of our sins and while the Spirit of God workes in our hearts by his good motions let us pray fervently unto our God to pardon our by-past sinnes to plucke us out of the dominion and power of sinne and Sathan and to preserve us from all sins for the time to come § 2. Neither in this world nor in the world to Sect. 2 come Who are confuted by these words Quest 1 The Sadduces Answ who denied the immortality of the foule and affirmed that there were neither Spirits nor Angels Orig. contra Cels Non agnoscunt se Seculum nisi praesens that is they acknowledged not a time to come when there shall be a Resurrection Although our Saviour saith here Neither in this life nor in the life to come whereby is intimated both the immortality of the soule and the Resurrection of the body Hence by the Iewes these Sadduces were called Menaim or Probrosi contentious or calumnious Gabia the sonne of Pesisa reasoneth against the Sadduces thus x Talm. phesikra Si quod non fuit id fuit Ergo quod fuit erit That is if that which was not was Therfore that which was shall be He meant if God created and made the world of nothing may he not make our bodies of something againe Object Bellarmine strongly presseth this place for the proofe of Purgatorie arguing thus Blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven neither in this world nor in the world to come Therefore some sins shall be forgiven in the next world by the prayers and suffrages of the Church But this remission is neither obtained in heaven nor in hell Ergo it is in Purgatory and therefore there is a Purgatory Bell. de purgat lib. 1. Cap. 1. loc 1. ex novo Testam Because this objection is abundantly answered by our men I may be the shorter in the answer of it I referre the Reader to Amesius Bell. enervat tom 2. pag. 197. 198. and Chemnitius exam part 3. pag. 135 136. Arg. 7. and Hill of the knowledge of the true God pag. 387. 388. Pareus s And because this place is urged by the Rhemists upon Matth. 12. § 6. I therefore referre the Reader to venerable Fulke and Cartwright upon the place onely entreating him to observe that this is no Categoricall Argument but only an Enthymeme in which the Antecedent is Christs and therefore most true but the Consequent will appeare to be most false Answ 1 First that which is fully paid and satisfied is not remitted But the Papists say that by Purgatory paines the debt is paid and Gods justice satisfied and therefore sinnes are not remitted in Purgatory It is one thing to pardon an offence and another to punish it and therefore if sinnes be punished in Purgatory as they say then how are they pardoned It is one thing fully to satisfie a debt another freely to remit it for how can he be said to remit a debt which makes the debter pay the utmost farthing as they say the soules in Purgatory doe Now this place speaking not of a paying but of pardoning not of recompensing but of remitting It shall shall neither be forgiven in this life nor in the life to come belongs not at all to their Purgatory where men satisfie Gods justice as they wickedly say to the full and wherein for the time men are extremely tormented the paines thereof being as some of them say equivalent to the paines of hell for the time And therefore by this their Argument instead of raising the fabricke of Purgatory they have razed the foundation as appeares thus The scope of their Objection is to prove that the sinnes of beleevers are remitted in the world to come now to remit and to punish are opposites as Chrysostome Hom. de poen confes saith Nemo remittit qui punire vult and therefore if the sinnes of the faithfull be remitted and pardoned in the world to come as they would prove from this place then undoubtedly they are not punished in the world to come And thus instead of confirming they have confuted instead of planting they have plucked up Purgatory by the roots for to deny that soules are punished in Purgatory is to deny Purgatory it selfe Secondly by this world is meant a mans life Answ 2 time in this world from the birth to the dying day and it is certain that in this time sins may be remitted the world to come is after this life is ended but a mans sins may be remitted at the hour of death And therefore by a Synechdoche it may be true that sins are also remitted in the other because the hour of death is the beginning of that other world The sense and meaning of this place therfore is That the sin against the holy Ghost is neither remitted in life nor death Now according to this exposition the place maketh nothing for Purgatory at all Thirdly or by the world to come may be Answ 3 meant as is generally understood the world succeeding this and so answereth to the world present as Mark 10.30 They shall at this present receive an hundred-fold and in the world to come life everlasting Wherefore Purgatory being imagined to be now present it cannot be taken to belong to the world to come And so also Ephes 1.21 and Heb. 6.5 the world to come is taken for the world which shal be after this is ended Willet Synops fol. 405. yea the Papists I think are not able to produce one place of Scripture
to prove that by the world to come is meant the time betwixt death and the day of judgement but alwaies either for the last day or the eternity which is after that day Luke 20.35 And thus Augustine de Civit. Dei lib. 21. cap. 24. by the world to come in this place understands the day of the Resurrection And Damascene also de orthod fid lib. 2. cap. 1. saith Aeterna vita aeternum supplicium futurum seculum ostendunt And thus This world is taken for the distance of time to the end of the world and The world to come for that eternity which shall begin after Christs second comming And according hereunto there shall be two times in which sins are pronounced remitted to wit this world by the preaching of the Gospel to the repentant and that to come when Christ shall confesse with his own mouth before Gods Angels to whom they are remitted and by which remission they are made truly blessed for that remission to come shall be a confirmation of this present and those which are not remitted here neither shall there be so pronounced Wherfore from this speech of our Saviours this Argument is gathered from the Antithesis If the sin against the holy Ghost be neither remitted in this world nor in the world to come then other sins are remitted both in this and the other or at least either in this or in the other But it is not remitted in the other because it is not remitted in this as hath been said It followeth therefore that other sins are remitted both in this and in the other Now in this sense this place doth not onely not make for Purgatory but also repugneth it For these two remissions in this world and the world to come are conjoyned and one is not separated from the other Chrysostome expounding this place together with this partition of time saith thus Amongst men I. Some shall be punished for their sins both here and there as the Sodomites II. Some onely in this life present as the Corinthian fornicator III. Some onely in the life to come as the rich glutton IV. Some in neither as the Prophets and Apostles And from this partition he infers that the meaning of our Saviour is That the sin against the holy Ghost is so grievous and horrible that they which commit it shall feel the judgement of Gods wrath both here and in the world to come which hapneth not to all who commit other sins Certainly they which with a set purpose deny the known truth against their consciences feel a hell of torments in their consciences in this life at some time or other if not alwaies and in the life to come their pains shall be exquisite and unspeakable in the most rigorous manner And therefore from this place nothing can be gathered for their Plutonicall rather than Platonicall Purgatory Answ 4 Fourthly it follows not the sin against the holy Ghost shall not be remitted in the next world therefore other sins shall no more than this followeth which Christ saith I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine untill I drink it with you in my Fathers kingdom Mat. 26.29 That therefore he did drink of other things because he did not drink of the vine For it is a most foolish absurdity from two Negations to infer an Affirmation as for example Saint Peter neither in this life nor in the life to come shall be made an Angell therfore some Saints in the life to come shall be made Angels Now Bellarmine would justifie this Argument by that example where Christ saith My kingdom is not of this world And Pilate inferreth thereupon Art thou a King then where an Affirmation is concluded out of the Negative To this Doctor Willet Synops f. 405. answers That the reason is not alike except Bellarmine will reason as Pilate did Thy kingdom is not of this world Therfore thou hast a kingdom So Blasphemy shall not be forgiven in the next world Therefore there shall be Blasphemy then Thus he might have concluded truly and thus he should have concluded if he would reason as Pilate doth for in hell there shall be Blasphemy Answ 5 Fiftly it follows not some sins shall be forgiven in the other world therefore in Purgatory For many have thought that sins shall be forgiven after this life and yet not in Purgatory neither Thus Origen imagined that after some long and grievous torments both the sins of the devils and of wicked men should be remitted And the Chiliasts thought that after a thousand years from the day of judgement all should be pardoned yea Augustine lib. 6. contrâ— Iul. cap. 5. thought that in the day of judgement some sins should be forgiven And therefore Purgatory is not necessarily concluded from the remission of sins after this life Answ 6 Sixtly by this reason of Bellarmines it may be concluded that mortall sins shall be remitted in the world to come because Christ onely excepts the sin against the holy Ghost but this the Papists will not grant and therefore why should we grant the other Seventhly from a particular Negation contrary Answ 7 to all Rules of Logick they infer an universall Affirmation If the sin against the holy Ghost shall neither be remitted in this life nor in the life to come Then say they all the temporall punishments of all sins which are not here fully paid shall be paid and satisfied by the faithfull in the world to come The meaning whereof is temporall punishments are due unto the faithfull for their sins part of which punishment they suffer in this life and the remainder in the life to come The Argument is cast in the same mould with this Socrates or Solomon is no fool therfore all men are wise and he is a fool and not wise who admitteth of such Arguments Sadeel adver hum satisf object pag. 247. Eightly Bellarmine argues A subcontrariis and Answ 8 yet doth not observe the Law of Subcontrarieties from which the force of the conclusion should follow As for example I. Some sinne is not remitted Some sinne is remitted II. Some sinne is not remitted in this life Some sinne is remitted in this life III. Some sinne is neither remitted in this life nor in the life to come Some sinne is remitted both in this life and in the life to come Now these are contraries and concluded according to the Rules of Art But the Papists conclude thus Some sinne is neither remitted in this life nor in the life to come Therefore some sinne is not remitted in this life but in the life to come Where the errour is so plaine that a fresh man can tell that it doth not conclude aright For to a double negation should be opposed a double affirmation wheras they oppose onely one As if a man should argue or conclude thus Some neither love God in this life nor in the life to come Therefore Some shall love God in the life to come which
Christians life for the better understanding hereof observe that there is a three-fold scope and end of a Christians life all which eâ—â—s are crossed and twarted by him who gives offence I. We were â—reated for Gods glory Those who offend doe I. Dishonour God And II. We were created for our brethrens edification Those who offend doe II. Infect their brethren And III. We were created for the salvation of our owne soules Now contrarily Those who offend doe III. Ruin and destroy their own souls For the better understanding of this we must yet observe that there is a double scandall or offence namely First in unlawfull things as Rom. 2.24 and 1 Cor. 5.12 and 2 Cor. 11.29 Now woe unto him by whom such offences come Secondly in lawfull things as Rom. 14.13 and 1 Cor 8.13 Now concerning these wee lay down this Rule That as Religion regulates Christian charity so love should regulate Christian liberty 1 Iohn 10.20 We expound and explain the Rule thus viz. I. This must bee understood of indifferent things not of Religious for wee must not for our love unto our brother omit or neglect any religious dutie or worke but wee may and ought to forbeare indifferent things if our brother be offended by them II. This must bee understood of indifferent things so long as they remaine indifferent and free and not of those things which are commanded by lawfull authority our love unto our brethren must not make us to disobey the Magistrate but if no such command be then wee must not offend them but for beare those things which are offensive III. This must be understood of infirme and weak brethren and not of those who are refractory obstinate and perverse Those who are weak and desire to be informed wee must be carefull not to offend as much as in us lies those who are obstinate and self-willed we need not be so carefull to please Quest 5 It is questioned amongst Divines whether Protestants with a safe conscience may go to the Popish Masse or not Answ To this a Reverend Prelate of our Church doth answer negatively and amongst other reasons brought for the confirmation of his answer produceth this drawn from this place because if any of our Religion goe unto their Masses hee sins against his brethren and principally those who are weak before whose feet he laies a stone of offence while by his example he allures and enticeth them unto the same liberty whereby their consciences must necessarily bee polluted Now that it is a sinne thus to offend them appears by these words Woe be unto that man by whom the offence commeth Neither can it be denied but that in so doing hee gives offence at least to the weak because an offence is nothing else then something said or done Minus rectum which gives unto another an occasion of stumbling and falling Now this deed of going to Masse doth give occasion to the weak to suspect that Masse is not a wicked idolatrous action and so consequently makes a way for him to incline and fall unto Popery and Superstition And therefore they sin who do so h Bishop Davenant qu. 7. determ pag. 40. Vers 8.9 VERS 8 9. Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee cut them off and cast them from thee it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maâ—â—ed rather thâ—n having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire And if thine eye offend thee pluck it out and cast it from thee it is better for thee to enter into life with one eye rather then having two eyes to be cast into hell fire Something hath beene said of these words before Chap. 5 29.30 And therefore I will onely adde a word or two to what hath been spoken Sect. 1 § 1. If thy hand or foot or eye offend thee Si sâ—â—ndâ—lâ—â—â— if it shall offend thee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as was said before comes a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Claudiâ—s as if our Saviour would say faciet clandicart Whence we may note Observ That sin makes men stumble and halt and fall into danger Rom. 11.11 12. and 14.4 1 Cor. 10.12 and 2 Cor. 11.3 The truth hereof further appears thus wee are commanded First to stand fast in faith and obedience Rom. 11.20 and 1 Cor. 16.13 Galath 5.1 Ephes 6.13 and 2 Thessal 1.15 and 1 Pet. 5.12 and Colos 4.12 and 1 Thessal 3.8 And Secondly to walk in the wayes of God Colos 1.10 And Thirdly to run the race of his commandements Rom. 9.16 and 1 Cor. 9.24 Galath 5.7 Now to fall is opposed to all these namely to standing walking and running For sin makes men fall either I. From obedience and that either Finally as Heb. 6.6 or Dangerously as Hebr. 12.15 Or II. From faith Galath 5.4 and 1 Tim. 6.21 What is here required of us Quest First wee must take heed of Apostasie that Answ 1 being a sin unpardonable Heb. 6.6 and 1. Iohn 5.16 if it be I. After illumination II. If it be a totall relapse III. If it bee conjoyned with presumption against the holy Spirit Hebr. 10.26 there remaines then no more sacrifice for sin Secondly wee must take heed of the cosen Answ 2 Germaine or rather brother unto this Apostasie namely the contempt of Christ or the Spirit or the Word and graces of God These which follow were the great sins of the Pharisees to wit I. They spake against Christ and his Word Matth. 12.25 and Marke 3.22 Hee casteth say they out Devils by the helpe of Beelzebub c. II. They contemned the means of grace the Word and Sacraments III. They abused the gifts and graces of the Spirit namely illumination and compunction IV. They spake often against their own consciences And therefore wee must take heed of these sinnes which lead unto a totall relapse wee must not speak against Christ or religion wee must not despise the means of grace that is either neglect or abuse the Word or Sacraments wee must walke according to our light and knowledge and be obedient to all the good motions of the Spirit and we must principally beware of sinnes against conscience because they lead unto Apostasâ—â— and Atheisme Yea Thirdly wee must take heed of all sinne Answ 3 whatsoever because nothing is so little that it shall goe for naught Yea because every sinne is mortall Wee must beware wee fall not I. From the course of our obedience and service of God unto the service and obedience of Sathan And II. From the liberty of the sons God into the snares and captivity of sin and satan 1 Timothy 2.25 III. We must take heed that we decline not from the grace of God for so long as we live holily God will protect us but if we tempt him we may justly fear that he will leave us IV. We must beware lest we fall from the comfort of the holy Spirit Ephes 4.29 we must not grieve the holy Spirit V. We must take heed
inst 4. 17. § 40. Here observe two things viz. First this state of grace in which we should be when we come to the Lords Table is diversely defined For I. The Papists say that it consists in Faith repentance and a confession of sinnes because it is necessary that he which comes to this holy Sacrament should confesse his sinnes to the Priest and be penitent for them and believe with a generall Faith the promises of the Gospell Concil Trid. II. We say that this state of grace in which we should labour to be doth consist in a hatred of all sinne in a resolution to leave all sinne and in a sure hope and confidence of mercy in and through CHRIST Secondly observe that Bellarmine here taxeth Calvin because he saith that men ought to come to the Lords Fable with a conscience of mortall sinne But we answer for Calvin thus That there is a double conscience of sinne I. A conscience accusing of some sinne which yet raignes in the heart without any confidence of remission that is when a mans conscience telleth him that the old leaven of sinne is not yet purged out but remaines and raignes in his mortall body neither hath any hope that the sinnes past are pardoned This is an evill conscience and it is dangerous for a man to come unto the Table of the Lord with such a conscience of sinne II. There is a blushing conscience for sinne which remaines within and presseth downe both in regard of the time present and by-past That is when a man blusheth and is ashamed both for his sinnes already committed and also for the reliques of sinne which remaine within him and strive and wrastle continually against him And this conscience of sinne Calvin requires in every one who approcheth unto the Supper of the Lord. II. Wee must examine our Faith and repentance by those markes and properties which were before shewed Quest 31. III. We must examine our desire of God and his holy Sacrament but of this we speake before in this same question answ 1. And thus much for our Preparation Who are to be held unworthy to partake of this Quest 35 Supper Or to whom is this Sacrament not to be given First it is not to be given to a Heathen or Answ 1 Gentile who is not baptized It is the Childrens bread and therefore must not be given to Dogs which are without the Church Secondly it is not to be given to those who are Answ 2 ignorant that is I. To those who are Infants aetate children in yeares And II. To those who are Jnfants eruditione et moribus children in manners and understanding for there are many babies of threescore yeares old who are as ignorant of the grounds and principles of Religion as children of three Both these sorts ought to be kept backe untill they be thorowly informed of the doctrine and nature of the Sacrament For Children and such ignorant ones as cannot discerne the Lords body are not to be admitted 1 Cor. 11.29 Answ 3 Thirdly this Sacrament is not to be communicated or given to notorious sinners whether I. Such as are justly excommunicated for giving some great and grievous scandall and offence unto the congregation wherein they live 1 Cor. 5.11 Or II. Those who publikely commit some haynous and enormious offences and repent them not of them for there are many such offenders who are not Excommunicated and yet because they are such offenders they are to be debarred from this sacred mystery Here observe that a signe is made enormious divers and sundry wayes viz. First Gravitate facti by the haynousnesse of the offence Thus Adultery drunkennesse murder swearing blasphemy treason and the like are enormious sinnes Secondly by a proud and obstinate defending of it as 1 Corinth 5.2 for the defending and maintaining of what is evill is a great aggravation of sinne and makes a little sinne a great one Thirdly sinne is made enormious by a negligent continuing therein And Fourthly by scandall and offence as 1 Corinthians 5.11 and 2 Samuel 12.14 Matthew 18.6 and 1. Corinthians 8.9 And therefore they who are given to grievous sinnes or who defend and justifie their sinnes or continue in their iniquities or give offence by their transgressions either to those within or without the Church are to be kept backe from the Sacrament untill they have shewed some repentance and amendment of life Fourthly this Sacrament is not to be given to a particular person as in private Masses because it is a Communion of Christians as was shewed before Quest 34 What doe they who are unworthy gaine by comming unto the Lords Supper Answ 1 First sometimes they gaine temporall punishment 1 Corinth 11.30 Answ 2 Secondly sometimes also eternall condemnation 1 Corinth 11.27 29. Quest 35 What is required in the administring or Minister of this Sacrament Answ 1 First he must administer true Elements and pure and good according to the institution 1 Corinthians 11.23 Answ 2 Secondly he must not separate the Elements that is give one and not another but administer to every Communicant both bread and wine Answ 3 Thirdly he must consecrate and blesse the Elements before he administer them and therefore if as it sometimes happens the wine faile which is first provided and a new supply of Wine is made by fetching more that is to be consecrated before it be administred 1 Corinth 10.16 Fourthly he must breake the bread Mark 14.22 Answ 4 Fifthly he must communicate it to a company Answ 5 and not to himselfe onely as in private Masses Is not preaching needfull and required in the Minister Quest 36 at the administration of this Sacrament First some answer here that it is not necessarily to Answ 1 the Sacrament required and they give two reasons for it namely I. Because it is not of the essence of the Sacrament neither is once mentioned in the Evangelists or in 1 Corinth 10. or 11. II. Because there is no commandement given any where to use it Secondly J answer that it is very usefull Answ 2 Ad bene esse and profitable for our preparation and instruction Thirdly there are many weighty causes why Answ 3 this Sacrament should be celebrated with Preaching or why preaching should be adjoyned to the administration thereof And that both I. That we may be instructed in the nature of the Sacrament and learne to discerne the Lords body and to make a difference betweene comming unto the Lords Table and our owne and of taking those Elements and our owne repast at home which too many doe not for want of instruction And II. That we might be admonished to prepare our selves to come unto the Lords Supper with reuerence And III. That by preaching our hearts might be the better excited both First for the expectation of the promises which are made in the Gospell to the worthy receiver And also Secondly for the performing of the Promises Articles and Covenants which we make unto God in the Sacrament And
from God Part 2. fol. 1. a. b. To which of Christs Apostles he gave Power and what power hee gave them Pt. 2. f. 1 b. Absence See Presence Abuse The best and most lawfull things may be abused Part 1. fol. 243. b. Account Divers necessary questions concerning our Spirituall account and reckoning with God Pt. 2. fol. 328 329 330. Actions Workes Divers profitable questions concerning the definition division necessity and nature of Workes in generall and good workes in particular Pt. 1. f. 72 a b. and 154. a b. 158 b. 177. b c. 179. a. b. 266 b. 270. b c. 341. b. 425. b c. 427. a. 471 a. 50â— b. 506 a. Pt. 2. f. 16 b. and 129 a. Divers questions concerning the merit reward examination and regulating of good Workes Pt. 1. f. 98 b. c. 158 a b. 258 b. 259 260. 266. 269 b. 270. 403 b. 426 b. 428 b. and Pt. 2. f. 46 b. 73 a. Who are enemies unto good Workes pt 1. f. 161. b. 259 a. 273 a b. Vnbeleevers cannot performe good Workes Pt. 1. fol. 262 a. Whether the Workes of the Righteous be perfect Pt. 1. fol. 330 331. Questions concerning Supererogatory Workes Pt. 1. f. 188 a. and pt 2. f. 235 a. 337 b. Adiaphorall things Ceremonies The Ceremonies of our Church used in Baptisme and the Lords Supper are lawfull Pt. 1. f. 67 b. and pt 2. f. 354. b. 355. Circumstances may make indifferent and lawfull things unlawfull and how pt 1. fol. 98 a b. Lawfull and Adiaphorall things are to be regulated according to a three fold rule Pt. 1. f. 98 a. Divers questions concerning Offences given and taken by Ceremonies and Adiaphorall things Pt. 2. fol. 207 208 c. and pt 1. f. 496. a b. Admonition Advice Counsell Who hide their Counsels and how it may lawfully be done Pt. 1. fol. 32. a b. Wee must Admonish Counsell and advise our Bretheren how and why Pt. 1. f. 153. a b. and pt 2. fol. 19. a b. Questions concerning Evangelicall Counsels unto Perfection Pt. 1. f. 186 a. 226 a. 262 b. and pt 2. fol. 243 b. 286 b. c. Adoption The nature markes and signes of adoption Pt. 1. f. 113 a. 487 488. Adversity Affliction Divers questions concerning the Causes end utility removall reward and benefits of Affliction and our duty in affliction Pt. 1. fol. 50 b. 112 b. 142 a. 169 a b. 303 a b. 314 a b. 362. and 439 b. and 448 a. and pt 2. f. 58 59. and 159. and pt 1. fol. 489. The Lord afflicts his Church and why pt 1. fol. 78 a. Vnlawfull meanes are never to be used in Affliction and misery and why pt 1. fol. 99 b. 100 a. Advice See Admonition Adultery Fornication adultery and uncleannesse must be avoided and why pt 1. fol. 216 a b. and 227 b. c. Divers questions concerning the division effects punishments and remedies of adultery fornication and uncleannesse pt 1. fol. 216 c. to fol. 223. Affections A right use of the affections helpes us in Gods service pt 1. fol. 41 b. Affliction See Adversity Agreement Vnity Concord Questions concerning our Vnion with Christ pt 2. fol. 278 a b. The Vnity and Vnion of the Church and faithfull is manifold pt 2. f. 8 a. 40 a. How brotherly Unity and Concord are to be continued pt 1. fol. 321 b. c. Christ loves Amity and unity amongst brethren pt 1. fol. 120. Allegories Figures It is lawfull to use Allegories and Figures in preaching pt 1. f. 120 b. Rules observeable in the Allegorizing of any Scripture pt 1. fol. 43 a. Almes Charity Divers questions concerning the division necessity impediments and remedies thereof and rules to be observed in the distribution of almes pt 1. f. 153. 155 156 157 158 160 b. 248 b. 268 269. Who are enemies to Almes-deeds and workes of charity pt 1. fol. 150 b. 151 a b. 267 a. Whether Almes-deeds be meritorius pt 1. fol. 160 a. and 267 a. Ambition Ambition is often the cause of arrogancy and arrogant presumption pt 1. fol. 46 a b. Amen What is meant by this word Amen part 1. fol. 321 b. Amity Love Divers questions concerning Love in generall the definition and division thereof and of our Love unto God pt 1. f. 133 b. 252 b. 334 b. 335. and pt 2. f. 54 b c. 286 287 288. Divers questions concerning the Love of our brethren Pt. 1. fol. 120 a. 159 b. 252 b. and pt 2. f. 56 b. 57 a. 135 b. 288 b. 289 a. Concerning the Love of our enemies See Enemies How Love is the fulfilling of the Law pt 1. f. 405 a. pt 2. f. 289 a b. Whether Love be a meritorious worke or not pt 1. folio 254. a. Anabaptists Famalists Separatists The Conventicles of Anabaptists and Familists are not warrantable pt 1. fol. 125 b. 126 a. Separatists are unpleasing unto God pt 2. folio 8 a b. The faithfull must be separated from the world and how Pt. 1. f. 175 b. Angels Divers questions concerning the evill Angels pt 1. f â—7 a. 140 b. 346. â— Questions concerning tutelary Angels part 2. fol. 214 b. Anger Divers questions concerning the nature originall causes effects degrees kinds and punishments of anger and the remedies against it pt 1. fol. 44 45. 105. 108. Christians must not be angry why pt 1. fol. 197. a. And what commendable anger iâ— Pt. 1. fol. 198 b c. and pt 2. fol. 297 b c. Whether anger be a â—eniall or mortall sinne pt 1. fol. 196 197 b. Anguish Griefe Mourning Divers questions concerning godly Mourners and mourning and the comforts and blessednesse which belong unto such Mourners Pt. 1. folio 142 143 144 145. There are divers sorts of Mourners pt 1. fol. 143 a b and 509 a. The outward expressions of sorrow are divers pt 2. fol. 8â— b. Answers All our Answers must be gentle and to the matter and why Pt. 1. fol. 114 a. Antichrist Who is Antichrist pt 1. folio 19. Whether he be one particular man pt 1. folio 17 b. and pt 2. fol. 315. b. Whether Antichrist be yet come pt 2. fol. 312 a. 313 a b. Antiquity When and how farre Antiquity is to be beleeved pt 1. fol. 189 b. 190 a b c. 194 b. Antiquity is a good proofe in controversies pt 2. fol. 233 a. Apostacy Backsliding The causes why so many are in danger to fall back and why so many doe fall back from Christ and Religion pt 1. fol. 132 b. and 506 a. and pt 2. fol. 28 a. 69 a b. Those who forsake and fall from Religion shall be forsaken pt 2. f. 6 a. Apostles Disciples Divers questions concerning the 12 Apostles and Disciples of Christ pt 1. fol. 134 135. 140 a. 171 172. 467 a. 495 a. and pt 2. fol. 1 a b. 2 a b. 12 a. 27 b. 387 b. Ministers must be Disciples before Apostles and why pt 2. fol. 1
hence to conclude that therefore fornication is a veniall sinne were I. To fall into a heathenist errour Non est flagitium juvenem fornicari who thought that for a young man to commit fornication with a single woman was a pardonable offence II. This were to contradict and oppose the Apostle Paul even in the very termes who distinguisheth and distinctly nameth Adultery and Fornication and positively affirmeth that not onely the Adulterer but also the fornicator shall never enter into the Kingdome of heaven 1 Cor. 6.9 13. Answ 4 Fourthly in good workes there is such a difference of degrees betweene the greatest and the least as there is in sinnes now the Papists say that the least good workes merit eternall life as well as the greatest and therefore not a mote but a beame is in their eye who cannot see the least sinnes truely to merit eternall death Vers 25 29. VERS 25.26 Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees hypocrites for ye make cleane the outside of the cup and platter but within they are full of extortion anâ— excesse Thou blind Pharisee cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter that the outside of them may be cleane also Object It may here be objected CHRIST is the promised seed Gen. 22.18 in whom all the nations of the earth are blessed Galath 3.16 who was not sent to condemne the world but to save it Iohn 3.17 and 12.47 â—cts 3.26 and will he twit and reproach and disgrace with reproachfull termes and names any Yea although they were sinners yet he is mercifull and meeke of whom it was foretold That he should be like a Lambe dumbe before the shearer not opening his mouth against his persecuters and we are commanded by him to learne of him to be lowly and meeke Matth. 11.28 And therefore how doth he now upbraid so tartly the Scribes and Pharisees Answ CHRIST doth not calumniate or reproach them out of hatred as they doe him Iohn 7.20 and 8.52 but out of love Indeed we read that he called Herod Foxe and the Pharisâ—es fooles and blind guides verse 16. and blind Pharisees verse 25. and painted sepulchers verse 27. and hypocrites or dissemblers and counterfeits in many verses of this Chapter but these were onely reprehensions and comminations because they slighted and abused the Gospell Hence then we may learne Obser That the true Ministers of God are sharpe and tart in reproving the contempt of the Gospell when they see the word which is the mighty power of God unto salvation despised and scorned then they stretch forth their voyces like a Trumpet Esa 58. and become Boanerges Sonnes of Thunder Moses was the meekest man in the world and yet he brake the two Tables for anger when he saw the Idolatry and wickednesse of the people Exod. 32. and afterwards was very angry with Korah and his company Numb 16.15 CHRIST was meeknesse it selfe and yet hee was angry when the Gospell was despised and the Messiah the true Corner stone rejected Marke 3.5 and denounceth many woes against such Contemners verse 13 14 15 16 25 27 29. of this Chapter Paul when the Gospell and word of God was slighted and spurned at separates the Apostles and departs and shakes off the dust of his feet Acts 19.9 Why must the true Ministers of the word be so Quest 1 sharpe and severe in reproving the contempt and contemners of the Gospell First because the Gospell is a great grace Read Answ 1 Rom. 15.29 and 1.11 and 1 Thes 1.5 and therefore it is a great ingratitude to slight or reject it Ierem. 51.9 Luke 19.42 Math. 23.37 Secondly because the contempt of the Gospell Answ 2 is the contempt of God hence CHRIST saith they have not despised you but me Thirdly because the contempt of the Gospell is Answ 3 scandalous to those who are without and makes it evill spoken of And therefore there is great reason that the Ministers of the word should be sharpe in their reproofes of the contempt of the Gospell and that both I. In regard of the contemners whose punishment shall be intolerable if they repent not And also II. In regard of God who is despised when his word is disrespected And likewise III. In regard of the Gospell which becomes odious unto those who enjoy it not when it is slighted and contemned of those who possesse it What is here required of those people or persons Quest 2 who enjoy the word First it is required that they endure patiently Answ 1 the word of reproofe and not wonder when the contempt of Religion is severely and tartly reprehended as wicked children are to be whipped and franticke men must be scourged and those who are lethargicall must be pinched and with a loud voyce called upon so those who doe enjoy the word or have long enjoyed it and doe not regard it are sharpely to be rebuked And Secondly it is required of them to take heed Answ 2 that they doe not provoke CHRIST by the contempt of his word or Gospell If men be offended with us men may mediate for us yea although our sinnes should depresse us and Sathan provoke us and the Law condemne us and the Lord be angry with us yet CHRIST could reconcile us and would if we prize as we ought the word of reconciliation Rom. 8.25 c. and 2 Cor. 5.19 20. But if CHRIST be angry with us who shall mediate or intercede for us If he shut the gates against us Matth. 25.22 and will not owne us Matth. 7. what will become of us how miserable will our estate and condition be And therefore if we desire that CHRIST may be our friend and we Gods favorites we must not contemne and reject but respect value and obey the Preaching of the Gospell Our Saviour having reproved the hypocrisie of the Scribes and Pharisees who made cleane onely the out side of the cup and platter verse 25 doth now exhort them to cleanse also yea first the inside of them The word here used is worth observing namely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies to purge in the Physitians sense as followes by and by The care of the Pharisees being onely to keepe the outward man free from the corruptions of the world and not the inward pure in the sight of God are reproved here for it by our Saviour and advised by him unto the contrary for this 26 verse containes the counsell of CHRIST concerning the purging of the inward man of the heart where although the proposition seeme to be single yet it is indeed double for our Saviour grants the Thesis that he may remove the Hypothesis The Thesis is purge The Hypothesis is not the outward man onely but the inward also and principally but I conjoyne them together Quest 2 What is meant by this word Purge Purge first the inside of the Cup. Answ 1 First sometimes it is taken for sweeping sometimes for brushing sometimes for wiping sometimes for washing and the like Answ 2 Secondly but