first vse Saint Paul speaking of himselfe saith Nay I know not sinne but by the laâ— for I had not knowne what lust meant except the laâ— hâ—â—â—â—id Thou shalt not lust That is he had noâ— knowne that euery tickling desire of concupiscence though râ—sisted had bene sinne except the law had said Thou shalt not lust Iames 1. Annotat. Rhems This vse of the law Popish Priests and Iesuites do deny First in teaching â—hat concupiscence it selfe is no sinne but when we do obey and yeeld to it Nay they doe suppose that â—he outrage of concupiscence and sensuall appetite is so â—arre off from sinne that he that consenteth not vnto it need not to say God forgiue vs our sinnes for the same Moreouer the Councell of Trident accurseth him that thinketh concupiscence to be a sin If it were no sin the law would not haue prohibited the same as it doth For saith S. Paul as it is in their owne translation But sinne I did not know but by the law for concupiscence I knew not vnlesse the law did say Thou shalt not couet But occasion being taken sinne by the commandement wrought in me all concupiscence Vpon which place the Annotation noteth That sinne Rom. 7. annotat Rhems or concupiscence which was asleepe before was wakened by prohibition the law not being the occasion thereof nor giuing occasion thereunto but occasion being taken by our corrupt nature to resist that which was commanded S. Ambrose vpon this place saith He hath not namely the Apostle discerned this concupiscence from sinne but ioyned it vnto it Signifying that when there was not so much as any suspition that this thing was not lawfull before God I knew saith he that it is a sinne The argument in the Rhems before the Epistle of Saint Iames thus speaketh The Apostle dehorteth from all sinne but yet also namely to certaine and from certaine As fro acception of persons froÌ„ detraction and rash iudgements from concupiscence and loue of this world By this we may see that concupiscence is of it selfe a sinne forbidden in the law before we do obey and yeeld vnto it Whosoeuer saith our Sauiour looketh on a womâ—â— to lust after her hath committed adultery with hâ—r alreâ—dy in his heart Againe not onely the man that â—illeth his brother is culpable of iudgement but he â—lâ—o that is angry wiâ—â— his bâ—â—ther vnaduisedly We â—râ— fâ—â—â—iâ—â—â—n 〈…〉 â—â—t onely to 〈…〉 tâ— be aâ—â—râ— Suruey 278. pag. 257. pâ—g 〈…〉 from a â—ultâ—â—â— aâ—â—â—â—â—â—â—tion buâ— alâ—o froâ— câ—â—â—â—s lookâ—s yea 〈◊〉 Wâ— aâ—e not only forbidâ—en tâ— oâ—â—end oâ—r friâ—eÌ„â—s but aâ—â—o 〈…〉 â—wes Againâ— thâ— lâ—â— restraineth oue◠〈…〉 â—s the ouâ—â—â—â—â— For Christ aâ—â—â—ng at that most excellent peâ—â—â—ction that was in Aâ—am when he wâ—s created forbideth in vs by his immâ—culate law thâ—t permitteth no sâ—â—th of siâ—ne the least euill that may arise through concupiscence to labour against his spirit in so heauenly a building as is the renouation of mâ—n to his pristen estate Aâ—g contra Iâ—â—â—â—â— liâ— 3 caâ— 3. Thâ—â—onâ—upiscence of the flesh saith Saint Augustine against which 〈◊〉 good â—â—â—â—it dâ—sireth or laboureth is both sinne it selfe and also the paine of sinne and the cause of sinne For as the Annotations vpon the Rhems teacheth Iames 1. mâ—â—â— In a tâ—â—â—â—tiâ—â— pâ—â—ted b◠〈◊〉 acâ—â—â—â—â—â—guâ—â—â—us 1â—â—0 From the concupiâ—cence of the flesh the â—â—â—â—upiscenâ—e of the eyes and the pride of life all sinne anâ— tempâ—â—tiâ—â—â— proâ—â—â—â— As Thomas vpon his Sums there cited confessâ—th Againe Concupiscence say they â—s aâ—â—â—rdinâ—te appetite of the soule inclining it to â—â—llow the dâ—â—ires of the fleâ—h proceeding from sinne and 〈◊〉 the soule to sinne Secondly they teach contraâ—â— to the law because they say that veniall sins as thâ—y stile them be no sinnes For a man saith the Aâ—â—â—ations vpon the Rhemâ— may be iust notwithstanding veniall sinnes Againe 1 Ioh. 1. marg Rom. 1. Rhâ—m Mat. 6. annotat Rhems veniall sinnes are pardonable of their owne nature and not worthy of damnation Now those sinnes that are pardonable in their owne nature owe to God no dâ—bt that is the punishment due for sins But venial sins do For dâ—bts do not onely sâ—gnifie mortall sinnes but also vâ—niâ—ll as S. Augustine by them often cited teachâ—th Therefore euery mâ—n be he neuer so iust yet because hee cannot liue without veniall sinnes may vâ—ry truly â—nd ought to sâ—y this prayer Forgiue vs our debts Againe wâ—osoeuer hath any impure matter of veniâ—ll sâ—nnes or sâ—ch other debts to Gods iudgments payâ—ble must into Purgatory or more truly into hell Rom. 6.23 if they be not pardoned in Christ For the wages of sin is death Thirdly they teach 1. Ioh. 1. marg 1. Ioh. 3. Annotat. Rhems that euery iniquity is not sinne against plaine Scripture that saith That all iniquity is sin 1. Ioh. 3.7 As it is in their owne Rhems Let no man say saith Saint Augustine sâ—â—ne is one thing iniquity is another thing I am a sinfull man but I am not vniust Euery one that doth commit sinne doth commit iniquity for sinne is iniquitie What thâ—â— shall wee do with our sinnes and iniquities No man in this life hath bene is or shall be perfectly iust Moreouer contrary to the law the Iesuite thinkes he sinnes not at all by lying impudently before his Kings fâ—ceâ— yea and confirming his lye with pâ—riury by laying his hand vpon the holy Gospel Anâ— why so Because hauing receiued a commandement from his Gâ—nerâ—ll to lye Iâ—suite Catech. 2. lib. 122. pag. his vow of obedience is so precise that he thinkes he is freed from all sinne and that he faulted much more if by telling the truth he had not obeyed him Here they pâ—ay the Priscillianists which sayd Iura periura secretum prodere noli Sweare and forsweare but bewray no secrets Fourthly whereas the law commands obedience vnto the Kings of the nations who beare rule ouer vs Exod. 20. Luke 22. and are as the forbidden fruit and apple in paradice that may not be touched Touch not mine annointed Psal 105.15 Yet notwithstanding it is a common thing with the Iesuites to preach to their yong Nouices concerning the murther of Princes And do teach that the Bulles of Rome haue power to depose all the Kings of the earth I sâ—ites Catech. lib. 3 pag. 204. â—e Franc. â—nâ— pag. 18. â— 64 65. 34. and to depriue them of their temporall state and Soueraignty That Kings so excommunicated ought to best â—ne though they be Catholickes That it is a good and meritorious deed to murther them The Councell of Coâ—stance saith a Iesuite condemned that odious Proposition concerning the killing of Princes by priuate men whensoeuer they iudge them for tyrants but when the Pope that King of pride shal iudge them for tyrants it seemeth it is meritorious for his army of Priests to set vpon them Richard Walpoole the Iesuite furnishing Squire with poyson instructioÌ„s to kil
and is risen againe for our iustification If one dyed for all saith Saint Bernard in his 190 Epistle to Innocent Bishop of Rome then all were lead that so the satisfaction of one might be imputed to all euen as that one person bare the sinne of all No maâ— saith Kellison citing Saint Iohn hath greater charâ—ty then this to dye for his friend and especially for his enemy And this also extolleth Christs power most highly who by death ouercame death yea sinne also and condemnation Here it plainly appeareth by Kellisons owne words that sinne with the guilt and punishment is taken away by Christ and we deliuered fron all sin both originall and actuall veniall and mortall à culpa poena that is from the fault and punishment due to the same as the Annotations vpon the Rhems acknowledgeth and the very Canon law likewise confesseth 1. Ioh. 1. annot De consec 4 cap. 8. 2. Cor. 5.2 Rhem. pag. 570. in teaching that the Son God tooke vpon him the flesh of sinne that is to say sinfull flesh and the punishment he being without fault that so in the flesh of sin both the fault might be satisfied and the punishment also Nay more that we should be made the righteousnes of God in him For he hath made him to be sinne for vs which knew no sinne saith the Apostle that wee should be made the righteousnesse of God in him Vpon which place Saint Chrysostome cited by Doctor Fulke saith that we should be made the iustice of God in him what speech what mind can set forth these things worthily for him that was iust he made a sinner that he might make sinners iust But rather he said not so but that which was much more for he named not the quality but the essence he said not a sinner but sinne it selfe not onely him which sinned not but him which knew no sinne that we might be made he said not iust but iustice it selfe and the iustice of God For this is the iustice of God when iustification commeth not of workes seeing it is necessary that no spot be found but by grace by this meanes all sinne cleane vanisheth away In the meane time he suffereth them not to be extolled seeing God performeth all and sheweth the greatnesse of the giuer in that the former iustice was of the law and of works but this is the iustice of God Primasius vpon this text saith God the Father made his Sonne sinne for vs that is a sacrifice 〈◊〉 sinne The sacrifice offered for sinne in the law was called sinne although it did not sinne at all as it is written And he shall lay his hand vpon the head of his sinne c. By the bloud of these sacrifices that bloud which was shed for vs was prefigured for Christ being offered for our sinnes was called by the name of sinne that we might be made the iustice of God in him not in vs. Theodoret vpon this text saith That when he was free from sinne he suffered the death of sinners that he might loose theâ— sinne of men and being called that which we were hee made vs that which he was for he gaue vs the riches of his iustice Thus it doth appeare that Christ hath not onely taken away the paine and punishment of sinne but also merited a sempiternall righteousnes for vs which is as an Ancient saith the very roote of life Otherwise what would become of that faith which the Annotations vpon the Rhems speaketh of that reacheth to the life to come Rom. 10. annot making man assured of such articles as concerne the same As of Christs coming downe to be incarnate of his descending to hell of his resurrection ascension and returne againe to be glorified by which actions we be pardoned iustified and saued as by the law we could neuer be In vaine would our faith be saith the Apostle if Christ was not risen iustified from our sins we in him 1. Cor. 15. â—7 for theÌ„ we were yet in our sins that is guilty before God Therefore because Christ is risen we are no longer in our sinnes that is we are in very deed absolued from them and the punishment due for them Being thus compassed about with a cloud of witnesses concerning the perfect redemption of man who can but behold our King comming out of his sepulcher as out of a palace leading death in chains and the Prince of death fast bound in fetters of iron and with all his elect traine following him saying O death where is thy sting O graue Ibid. 15.55 56. where is thy victory The sting of death is sinne the strength of sinne is the law But thankes be vnto God that hath giuen vs victory in our Lord Iesus Christ by whom we haue redemption through his bloud Eph. 1.7 euen the forgiuenesse of our sinnes according to his rich grace Secondly forasmuch as that it standeth not with Christs Kingly power to begin and not to accomplish his subiects happinesse hee in his all-seeing wisdome hath merited the Spirit of his Father for vs through the effectuall working power whereof as by his diuine finger he writeth his law in our minds and hearts according to his promise So that the elect may say together with their Sauiour Heb. 8. Psal 40.8 I desired to do thy will ô my God I am ready to do it yea thy law is within my heart That is all knowledge to the performaÌ„ce of thy law which the naturall man cannot attaine vnto vnlesse God inlighteneth his vnderstanding to discerne betweene obiects things set before it in the holy Scriptures Againe Christ through the effectuall working of his Spirit prepareth the heart by making it soft and tender to will those things that are pleasing to God yea to do the will of God 1 Thes 4.3 whose will it is that we should be holy and cleane When he hath thus done he sitteth in the heart of man working both the will and the deed according to his good pleasure to the perfecâ— repairing of the Image of God in him God sittetâ— saith an Ancient in the heart of man like a King in 〈◊〉 palace in his word like a King in his Councell in hiâ— Church like a Generall in his army in his throne like a conquerour in his triumph Hee sate in the heart of Matthew whom of a Publican and notable sinner he made an Apostle and Euangelist He stirred such a course in the heart of Paul that of a cruell persecutor he became a faithfull and zealous Preacher Yea though Christ doth repaire that which we haue losâ— by Adams transgression according to the saying oâ— the Councell of Arausicanum chap. 21. Nature by Adam lost by Christ is repaired yet Kellison doth taxe his passion with this false imputation to egge vs forward to all vice to open a wide gappe to all licencious lilibertie and iniquitie But if a Pope with Bonifacâ— the eighth or Clement the sixth
thing at Gods hands that by their doctrine we be still indebted to God concerning the punishment the debt of sinne Therefore it must needs be that all that are deliuered out of the common condemnation are deliuered by the meanes and merits of Iesus Christ as the Annotations elsewhere truly teacheth or not at all Rom 9. annot Reue. 20. marg Againe they thus teach Reue 2. annot Reue. 1. annot 2. Tim. 4. annot That none vnperfectly cleansed can enter into the kingdome of heauen Againe that God cannot be good that can loue and saue him hee knoweth to bee euill Yet they send the Catholicke Christian man liuing but an ordinary honest life either not sinning greatly or supplying his fault by penance as a man of great iustice to challenge heauen in his owne right bargained and wrought for and accordingly to be paid for him Others that are altogether vncleane and not so chast as the Priest that keepeth but one Concubine that they may be made heires of other mens goodnesse that haue none in themselues as the Pope is of Peters make with the foolish virgins purchase of counterfeit oyle that they may receiue to their saluation righteousnesse from their workes of supererogation As the Pope though neuer so wicked receiueth his holinesse by succession of Chaire Others seeke it in Popes Pardons Apol. Bish Iewel pag. 147. Ibid. 125. who by power as hardening inforceth is Peter by annoynting Christ And thus Simon Begumus Bishop of Madâ—usia in the late Councel holden at Lateran in Rome sought it who poynting to the Pope as Iohn Baptist did to Christ said Behold the Lyon is come of the tribe of Iuda of the roote of Dauid ô most blessed Leo we haue looked for thee to be our Sauiour And thus the Ambassadors of Sicilia fought it who cryed lying prostrate on the ground O thou holy Father that taketh away the sinnes of the world haue mercy vpon vs Thou which takest away the sinnes of the world giue vs peace Others in the Popes Chaire For the truth saith Cardinall Cusanus cleaueth fast to the Popes Chaire Therefore the members vnited to that Chaire and ioyned to the Pope make the Church Others whom the Pope iudgeth in his finite wisedome to bee somewhat vncleane are sent into Purgatory which as Angelus Parsiensis saith is the peculiar possession of the Pope there to stay till his Holinesse thinke them sit through the mediation of Angels to passe to heauen There is none sent to haue passage by Christ to that hauenly Ierusalem but the abiects of the Gentiles Cal. 3. annot Rhem. who commit mortall sinnes For they as the Annotations teacheth cannot be deliuered by themselues nor by any other meanes from the curse of the law but by faith and the grace of Christ Iesus Here we may behold the Angels of light leading to Christ in teaching that not some part but all Christs obedience is imputed vnto vs. The other namely the Angels of darknesse hauing mingled lerma malorum a heape of mischiefe sends men thither from Christ to seeke saluation in them But as Saint Augustine saith Ecclesia in nullo homine spem ponere à suo redemptore dedicit The Church hath learned of her Redeemer to put no trust in any man OPPOS 7. The Preachers of this Monarch teaching that faith onely iustifieth open a gap thereby to all vice Suruey pag. 526. THis Popish Iesuite vseth Faith that is an assurance in Christ for happinesse according as hee hath done the obiect namely Christ Iesus In teaching that faith cannot iustifie without opening a gap to vice As Christ could not make a perfect redemption for vs without opening a gate to all licentious libertie vice and iniquity But contrary to this Pelagian opinon we will proue that Faith onely doth iustifie and withall in the next position make manifest that though the Preachers of this Monarch teach this doctrine yet withall preaching an inherent righteousnesse as well as an imputatiue sanctification as well as iustification open no gate at all to vice Whereas they teaching neither the one nor the other neither the tree nor the fruit set open a gap to all idolatry But first concerning this doctrine in hand we are to consider that the reason why we are iustified by faith and not by workes is because iustification and therefore saluation goeth before workes For the way which the holy Ghost vseth to make vs able for them is Faith vniting vs to Christ whereof he himselfe is a witnesse who saith As the branch cannot beare fruit of it selfe except it abide in the vine no more can you except you abide in me Apol. Bish Iewel pag. 296. The beginning saith Saint Syrill cited by Bishop Iewel and foundation of our â—olineâ—se is Christ by faith I meane and none otherwise for in this sort Christ dwelleth in vs. Those onely are to be counted good wookes saith Saint Augustine which are wrought by loue Faith of necessity must go before for they must take their beginning from saith Rhem. â—4 pag. and not faith from them Saint Ambrose cited by Doctor Fulke thus speaketh Faith onely shal go with you to the next life and iustice shall also accompany you Heb 11. annot If faith go before which as the Annotations vpon the Rhems teacheth is the ground and foundation of all other vertues and worship of God without which no man can please God Rhem. pag. 232. Then that which followeth after which is workes cannot be the cause of that which goeth before namely the free iustification of life through faith By this argument Paul proueth that neither Gentile nor Iewe are iustified by workes but by grace For by grace yee are saued saith the Apostle through faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God The Church casteth all her liuing into the gift of God which vnderstandeth all that she liueth not to be of her merit but of Gods gift when she saith God be mercifull to me a sinner As Beda teacheth cited by Doctor Fulke For whether we respect faith or righteousnesse and life which we receiue from Christ by that instrument of faith they are all the gifts of God No maruaile then if Saint Augustine stileth the opinion of merit pride and the iustification of saith the discipline of humility Seeing this as Saint Basil teacheth is a full and perfect reioycing in God When a man doth not boast himselfe of his owne iustice but knoweth himselfe to bee voyd of of true iustice and to bee â—ustified by onely faith in Christ Saint Paul in the definition of the Gospel the seed of immortality sheweth Rom. 1 1â— that the efficient cause of our iustification is the power of God Rom. 1.10 Gal. 3.11 Heb. 10.3 the end our saluation and the instrument whereby it is receiued faith for he addeth vnto euery one that beleeueth And this he confirmeth by a testimony of the Prophet Abacucke wherein