consequent the thinges that follow proue that both are found in the Scripture and with the fathers concerning the imputation of Christs righteousnesse there are two expresse testimonies among the rest in Scriptures Rom. 4.6 1. Cor. 1.30 And by Consequent these are speciall first That the remission of sinnes which is the second Part of Iustification is expressed in Scriptures by the name of not Imputing Rom. 4.7 8. Secondly that the Apostle denyeth any proper or inherent righteousnesse to the end hee might establish that which is of Imputation by faith Phil. 3.8 Thirdly because looke what the maner of our sinne is in Christ the same is also the manner of Christs righteousnes in vs to wit in both by imputation 2 Cor. 5.21 The testimonies of the fathers are also frequent To the SECOND FIrst whether you respect Gods truth Imputation of righteousnesse is conjoyned with the Remission of sinnes Dan. 9.24 Rom. 4.6 7. Or whether you respect our Salvation it was behouefull also that the two parts of Iustification should bee opposed to a double evill wherevnto wee were subiect to punishment remission of sinnes to offence imputation of righteousnesse Or lastly whether you respect the satisfaction of the Law two things were necessary the first that wee might bee freed from the punishment which the law threatneth secondly that wee might fulfill the law and so might bee made like vnto Christ Secondly neyther doe the places which are cited concerning the Remission of sinnes take away the Imputation of Christs righteousnesse sith the thinges which put themselues one with another cannot duely be put one against another Thirdly the opposition which is made in Rom. 5 hath not respect to the manner of inherence or imputation but to the Causes Effects and Subiects of salvation condēnarion The Causes of salvation being the obedience of the second Adam but of Condemnation the disobedience of the first The Effects that by the one wee are made iust by the other Sinners The Subiects on both sides there are many men found to witte in the cause of condemnation vniversally but in the cause of Salvation generally To the THIRD FIrst there is a double vse of the Imputation of Christs righteousnesse the one is to absolue vs before God the other to cover the imperfection of our righteousnesse that is Primary this Secondary Secondly the perfection which is attributed to Faith Hope and Charity is tearmed so aequivocally and is to bee expounded according to that three-fold respect thereof of which we haue before spoken To the FOVRTH FIrst wee are sayde to be Formally iust eyther subiectiuely or by relation subiectiuely by righteousnesse inherent in vs which is vnperfect relatiuely by Christs righteousnes which is perfectly imputed vnto vs. Secondly it is false that a thing should alwayes haue a name outwardly from the qualities which may bee inwardly sith even in naturall thinges the bodies of the starres shine not with their owne but with a b Ascititio borrowed light that is by the benefite of the Sunne Things subordinate doe not disagree neyther are they two contrary formes to wit the outward and the inherent sith that is both the fore-going and forming cause of this To the FIFT IF you respect the truth of righteousnesse imputed vnto vs wee are accounted truely righteous before God no lesse then Christ but if you respect the quantity and subiect Christ is more righteous then wee because hee is so actually wee imputatiuely hee subiectiuely wee relatiuely in him vnto him and therefore wee cannot nor ought to bee accounted Redeemers and Saviours for that of Christs actions there are two sorts the one is of them which being named in the Abstract or devided do not so much signifie the office of Christ as his benefite obtayned for vs the other of them which in the Concrete or conjunction doe not so much note out to vs the benefite as his personall office The names of those are wont to be changed but the names of these are bounded in the person of Christ To the SIXT OF the restoring of Gods image in vs by Christ there are two parts the abolishing of the depraved Image and the renuance of the same That is performed by the Imputation of Christs righteousnesse This is by the benefite of sanctification or inherent righteousnesse and both wee haue of Christ To the SEVENTH FIRst there is a double consideration of Christ the one as touching himselfe the other as touching vs whose person hee tooke vpon him in respect of the former Christ is sayd to be just holy c. In respect of the latter hee is saide to bee made sinne the curse c. Secondly albeit it sinne bee called a sacrifice according to the Hebrewes proper forme of speech yet the manner of opposition in the cited place requireth that hee bee rather sayde to be made sinne that is a sinner not in himself but by the guilt of all our sinnes imputed vnto him a figure of which thing the two he Goates were whereof mention is made Leu. 16. To the EIGHT FIrst there is a two-fold fairenesse of the Bride the one which shee hath of her Spouse by perfect imputation the other which shee bath in her selfe by a beginning in this life Secondly the beauty of Christ and of his church differ not in Forme but in the Subj ct and manner of propriety for in Christ is fayrenesse by manner of inherence in the church by manner of imputation Thirdly shee is sayd to bee faire among women not opposed to Christ but to other women To the NINTH FIrst the Purenes wherewith wee are prepared for the seeing of God is as well that which we haue by Imputation as that which is in vs subiectiuely in this life Secondly neyther is imputation a vaine thing onely which may seeme or onely be thought to be for it is in very deede applyed vnto vs whereas Relation is not an idle thing but an application vnto the bound thereof it must needes bee that this Imputation is some what which wholy consisteth in Relation To the TENTH HEb 9. Ephes 5. Tit. 2. Ioh. 16. Ans First the word Sanctification is c Homonyma of divers significations for it signifieth Iustification it selfe or the effect of Iustification and in the first signification it is taken in the cited places but not in the second Secondly these wordes Truely and Imputatiuely are badly opposed the one to the other sith those things also which are imputed vnto vs are as truely ours as if they were in vs subiectiuely OF THE COVENANT of GOD. The Part Confirming CHAP. X. ANd these are the degrees according to which God in this life by calling effectually and iustifying freely disposeth the benefit of redemption Now by order we are to see concerning the outward meanes by which God ordinarily executeth that dispensation The outward meanes ordinarie of the execution thereof on Gods behalfe are two the couenant and the seales and sacraments of the couenant
for some are Principall Antecedent some Secondary and Consequent whereof those properly respect our Faith before God but these our confession before Men. After the first manner the end of baptisme is to signifie seale and exhibite Sacramentally the Remission of sinnes the benefite of Regeneration and our vnion with Christ The Remission of sinnes for albeit sinne by reason of the state of Nature abide as touching the disease or roote of sinne and the very matter yet it is taken away by reason of the state of the person as touching the guilt or forme which is not imputed to the faithfull Hence it is that Baptisme is sayde to bee given for the remission of sinnes f Act. 2.38 22.26 The benefite of Regeneration because we being ingraffed into Christ by baptisme are changed into his nature and are made partakers of his divine Nature for which cause it is called the Laver of Regeneration g Tit. 3.5.6 Our Vnion with Christ for hence it is that wee are sayde to be Baptized into Christ h Ga. 3.27 and into the Name of Christ i Mat. 28.19 1. Cor. 12 13. by baptisme to be buried with Christ and to be baptized into his death and resurrection k Rom. 6.3.4 After the Latter manner the end of baptisme is first that it may bee a Testimony of our godlinesse and obedience vnto God with Thanksgiving l Ioh. 4.1 Act. 2.41 Secondly that it may bee a badge discerning the Church together with her members frō prophane Nations Thirdly that it may bee the bond of the communion of the Church and their mutuall loue who are dipped in the same Lavar From this consideration of the causes two Consequents are drawn the one of the Necessity the other of the Effect and Efficacy of Baptisme The Necessity two thinges doe circumscribe or limite The Institution of God and the Condition of him that is to be baptized The Scope of Gods Institution is not to tie eyther the things signified to the Signes or the men to the Sacraments by an absolute necessity forasmuch as God by an immediate and extraordinary action when he will and on whome he will conferreth the thing signified neyther can the simple want but the contempt of the Sacrament be hurtfull which doth befall neyther vnto all Infants nor all them that are of ripe yeares but according to the liberty of his will it may seale the things signified in them who both can and should receyue the vse of the signes They that are to be baptized are persons of yeares and Infants to a person of yeares Baptisme is necessary vnto Salvation two wayes eyther by Desire and Will if liberty be not granted him to take the Layer of water or really and in very deed if liberty bee granted For faith hath alwayes joyned with it the desire of obedience To an Infant Baptisme is necessary not simply for the Invisible but after a sort for the visible ingraffing of him into Christ and the body of the Church which if the point of necessity doe bar him from that invisibly is fulfilled with out baptisme which otherwise is shewed in the visible baptisme The Effects of baptisme are not either the doing away of all guilt and punishmen or the conferring of grace by the worke done or lastly an impression of a marke that cannot bee raced out but they are the same with those which are the ends thereof aboue expounded The Efficacy of all which Effects is not ascribed to the outwarde baptisme or the Elements of water but to the bloud of Christ and the inward baptisme of the Spirit which by a hidden operation conferreth that invisible Grace which is signified in the outward Baptisme OF BAPTISME The Part Confuting I. THe Word Baptisme is taken two wayes in the Scriptures Properly and Figuratiuely Properly it signifieth two things first a dipping into the water secondly any simple washing or cleansing and in this signification by an excellency the first Sacrament of the New Testament is called Baptisme Figuratiuely it importeth foure things eyther by an Allegory the deluge of the waters the passing through the Sea and the abiding vnder the cloud or by a Metaphor the crosse or every extreame affliction or by a Metalepsis the powring out of the giftes of the Spirite or lastly by a Synechdoche the whole doctrine of Iohn and his whole Ministery II. BAptisme in kinde is but one but in the manner of considering it is two-fold Outward and Inward that is of the Water this of the Spirite and bloud which three because indeed they are the parts of the whole Baptisme from each one every of the three kindes of Baptisme doe spring to witte the Baptisme of Water Inspiration and bloud In Defence of the Efficient Cause or the Minister baptizing and first that the baptisme of Iohn Baptist and the rest of the Ministers was one and the selfe same against Bellarmine Lib. 1. de Sacra Bapt. Cap. 20.21.22 THe DISTINCTIONS I. THat baptisme cannot bee sayde to haue beene instituted of Iohn himselfe which the Scripture teacheth to haue beene a baptisme administred by Gods commaundement Luc. 3.2.3 To be from Heaven Mat. 21.25 and which the Pharisies refusing are sayd to haue despised the counsell of God Luc. 7 30.15 but in that it is called the baptisme of Iohn it distinguisheth between the Ministery of Iohn himselfe and the mastership of authority of Christ II. THe Invocation of the Trinity is expressed in the Scriptures eyther according to the very formall words or according to the sence and truth albeit those wordes be not expressed in the administration of Iohns baptisme yet the consequence of diverse Arguments doe aboundantly proue the sence truth of the Invocation for therefore is Iohn sayd to haue baptized into Christ Act. 19.4 and to haue preached the baptisme of Repentance for the Remission of sinnes Mar. 1.3 III. THe time of the Institution of baptisme ought not to bee reckoned since Christs resurrectiō from the dead or since his baptisme in Iordan but since the time of his manifestation in the flesh from which the time of the New Testament ordinarily taketh his beginning IIII. THe difference of baptisme is one Essentiall the other Accidentall That according to the substance and effect This acording to the circumstance and manner of Christs manifestation but there are two causes why he would distinguish betweene his baptisme and Christs the first that hee might note the difference betweene the outwarde Baptisme of Water and the Inwarde Baptisme of the Spirite the other that hee might distinguish between his owne person and office and betweene the person and office of Christ Adde further that the Baptisme of the spirite is taken for the visible gift of miracles powred out on the Apostles according as the conferring of places m Parallelorum the one with the other teacheth Act. 1.5 11.16 but in that it is spoken in the future tense it is an Enallage or change
onely concerning the condigne but not so much as concerning the congruent The outward impulsiue cause is Christ God-man both in respect of his merit as also of his efficacy and operation Of his merite because both by obeying and suffering in his life and death he purchased for vs the benefite of Iustification t Esa 83.3 1. Tim. 2.6 1. Ioh 1.7 Rom. 8.30 31. Of this Efficacy because he effectually applyeth this purchased benefit both by offering the same by the preaching of the word conferring it by the inward and effectuall operation of his spirite u Rom. 1.16 2. Cor. 5.19 On mans behalfe that which is is called reductiuely the Efficient cause of the Passiue Iustification is wholy Instrumentall and it is saith by which not for which we are sayde to bee iustified both in respect of her Correlatiue as also in respect of her cōtrary the law and good works Of her Correlatiue because the whole forme of saith as it is justifying consisteth in relation neyther is it sayde to justifie vs as it is a quality but as it is occupied relatiuely in the applying of her Correlatiue u Gal. 3.8 Heb. 2.4 Rom. 1.17 Of her contrary because the good workes which are required in the person of him that is justified are excluded from the merit of Iustification as in the place concerning Earth and Workes shall be spoken more at large x Rom. 5.15 11.6 Ephes 2.8.9 The matter of Iustification which on Gods behalfe is considered actiuely is two fold according as there are two parts of Iustificatjon the Remission of sinnes and the obedjence of Christ For because we y Asiequuti sumus procured vnto our selues both the bond of death and the deprjuation of righteousnesse and life both were needful for our Iustificatjon that both our sinne might bee abolished by Remission that wee might be freed from death which is the wages of sinne and that righteousnesse might bee communicated vnto vs to the end we might attaine vnto life z Dan. 9.24 Gal. 3.13 By the name of Remission of sinnes we vnderstand that gratious act of God whereby hee perfectly forgiueth and remitteth the fault and the punishment for the merit and satisfaction of Christ a 2. Cor. 5.19 Rom. 8.1 4.7 The foundatiō hereof is the righteousnesse of Christ not his Essentiall and Diuine b Esa 42.8 nor yet his habituall which was his originall righteousnesse opposite vnto our originall righteousnesse or spot of nature but his actuall righteousnesse which is the effect of both namely a most perfect obedience performed to the Father both by satisfaction for sin and by fulfilling of the Law For the obedience of Christ is two fold opposite to the double bond of man after his fall actiue for the fault passiue for the punishment or both for both The Actiue obedience is a perfect performance of Gods law which Christ fully and perfectly executed even to the vtmost title c 1. Cor. 1.30 Rom 5.19 2. Cor. 5.21 of the law the necessitie hereof in the worke of our Redemption and Iustification three things doe prooue the Iustice of God the office of a Mediatour and our Salvation The iustice of God for if you eyther respect his nature wherby he is infinitly iust he ought not to saue man but by the same manner of iustice d Prou 17 Exod. 20.5 eyther proper to vs or freely imputed or if we respect his will revealed in the law which is an vnmoueable 〈◊〉 of Iustice he hath prescribed none other way vnto life than obedience The office of Christ the Mediatour for wheras he as our surety was bound by a voluntary dispensation to vndergoe and performe those things which we our selues were necessarily bound to vndergoe and performe it was needfull that he should not onely suffer death for vs but also performe the law because we were bound vnto both e Rom. 8.3 Gal. 4 45. Our Saluation for whereas two things are necessary for the same a freeing from death and a giuing of life it was needfull we should obtaine the one by the purging of sinne and the other by the gift of righteousnesse f Rom. 10 4 Rom. 5 19 20. Hence it is that Christ is said to be the end and presection of the law vnto Saluation to every one that beleeveth and the actuall obedience of Christ whereby we are made just is in the Scripture opposed to the actual disobedience of Adam whereby wee are made sinners g Heb. 10.14 Rom. 4.25 1. Pet. 1.19 1. Ioh. 1.7 Gal. 3.13 Adde further that in the very passiue obedience the actiue neverthelesse doth of right challenge vnto it selfe the chiefty for the suffering doth not simply justifie but as it is the suffering of Christ voluntarily presenting himselfe to God the Father by his Eternall Spirit whervpon the same Christ by offering himselfe as a sacrifice suffered as a Sacrificer performed it The Passiue obedience of Christ is the sacrificing or suffering of Christ very necessary in respect of God of Christ the Mediator and of vs. Of God because his justice must haue beene satisfied by punishment Of Christ because he being our surety ought to haue payde our debt Of vs because it was needefull that we should be freed from death by death h Num. 8.33 The Subiect of this righteousnesse is Christ alone in whom subiectiuely that habituall Iustice is inherent and from whom that both actiue passiue obedience proceeded which wee called actuall righteousnesse The matter of Iustification which is considered Passiuely are men elect i Rom. 5.8 10. Tit. 3.3 Eph. 2.12.13 Of this matter there is commonly had a double notion the one according to Nature the other according to Grace supernaturall according to nature they are sinners and therefore subiect to the accusation and malediction of the law k Rom. 8.30 Eph. 5.30 Ioh. 17 20. according to grace supernatural they are beleevers or ingraffed by faith into Christ The forme of Iustificatiō taken actiuely is a feee imputation of Christs actuall righteousnesse whereby the merits and obedience of Christ are applied vnto vs by vertue of that most strait communion whereby hee is in vs and we in him The forme therfore consisteth in Relation in which the vnity that ariseth thereout hath between both boundes the manner of a forme and consisteth rather in the issuing forth and the habite then in the inherence Hence it is also that Relation is sayde m Non esse eius sed esse ad aliad not to bee his but to be in respect of another Now it is receyved by right of the giving and acceptance of the merites of Christes obedience for this imputed righteousnesse is grace and not nature the communicating of a benefite not a Real or habitual possession of the righteousnesse or substance of Christ Lastly an Imputation not a passible quality inherent in vs. In this Imputation we consider two things the truth
cited as that of the Councell of Carthage and of Milevitum out of Augustine For those Councels doe treate against the Pelagians who at that time denied the baptisme of children and some are suspected as that of the Tridentine Councell and the Testimonies of the Popes III. INfants ought two wayes to bee considered eyther according to common nature or the singular manner of the covenant and grace that way they are conceived in sin but this way they haue obtayned remission of sinnes by the promise In Defence of the Effects of baptisme against the same Cap. 4 and the rest that follow I. SInne dwelling in vs is by baptisme taken away by three meanes and degrees First because it is not imputed Secondlie because by little and little the body thereof is destroyed Thirdly because in death it shall vtterly bee taken away by the power of the same bloud of Christ wherewith wee are washed in Baptisme II. IT is one thing to speake of the cause of Iustification and another thing of the Instrument thereof lastly an other thing of the sealing the cause is the merite of Christ the Instrument is Faith and the sealing is Baptisme III. THe new and vncertaine devise of the Schoolemen concerning the Character or Marke which cannot bee defaced is with the same facility denyed as it is affirmed chiefly whereas neyther Scripture teacheth nor necessary reason sheweth nor authoritie of Fathers proveth any such Character Adde further that the chiefe reason why Baptisme is not iterated is not the impression of the character but Gods onely Institution OF THE LORDES Supper The Part Confirming CHAP. XIII THe other Sacrament of the christian church immediately instituted of Christ for the perpetuall vse thereof is The Lords Supper whereof though there be divers appellations both in Scriptures and with the Fathers for in the Scriptures it is called The body and bloud of the Lord The New Testament The Communion The breaking of bread The Lords Table The bread and the cup The Communicating of the body bloud of Christ a Mat. 26.28 Luc. 22.20 Act. 20.7 1. Cor. 11.25 1. Cor. 10.21 1. Cor. 10.16 which by the Fathers First it is called a gathering together The Eucharist or Thankesgiving Publâ—â—g Administration Secondly the Latâ—â—â— Offering because of collections and sacrifice for the remeÌ„brance of Christs Sacrifie yet most properly by this appellation Of the Lords Supper the thing it selfe hath most fitly beene expressed and indeed it is called The Supper with respect had both of the thing and of the time because it is a holy banquet of the soule and not of the belly instituted of the Lord and that in the Evening but the Lordes in respect both of the Author who is the Lord and of the End which is the remembrance of the Lord. Now it is defined to be A Sacrament of the New Testament instituted of Christ consisting of the Signe and the thing signified proportionable by an Analogicall Relation and action of themselues betweene themselues whereby the full growne members of Christ and his church are trayned vp and taught in the lawfull vse of the visible signes concerning the true and spirituall communication of the body and bloud of Christ vnto life eternall The Efficient Cause of the Lordes Supper ought to be considered eyther as instituting or as vsing and administring the same that is the principall cause but this is the serving or administring cause The Principall or Instituting cause is the Lord from whome it hath beene customably called the Lordes Supper to wit Christ God and man our onely Redeemer instituting the mystery of his body and bloud by the oblarion whereof hee redeemed vs b Rom. 15 18. 1 Cor. 11.23 Of this mysticall and divine Institution there are two parts Christs Deeds and his Words by the one wherof hee limitted and left an example of Administration by the other a doctrine of Institution Of Christs Deeds wherby the manner of the lawfull publicke office or administratioÌ„ is declared there are three partes according as concerning both signes which Christ receyved he orderly vsed holy and ceremoniall actions c Mat. 26.26 Mat. 14.22 Luc. 22.19 1. Cor. 11 24. The first is Blessing and Thankesgiving for the Scripture vseth those two words the one Mathew Marke vseth the other Luke and Paul both signifying the one selfe same thing to witte how Christ by prayers to God by thanksgiving and all that holy action prepared appointed and sanctified the Bread and Wine to a holy vse that they might bee a Sacrament of his Body and Bloud not by their owne nature but by divine Institution and this is that true Consecration or Sanctification of the Sacrament whereof mention is made among the Fathers The Second is The breaking of the Bread and the powring of the wine into the Cuppe which Christ vsed not onely for the cause of dividing and distributing thereof but for the representing of his death for it is an Essentiall and Sacramentall Ceremony of the Lordes Supper pertayning to the end forme thereof d Mat. 26.26 Mar. 14.22 Luc. 22.19 1. Cor. 11.24 The third is the offering and distributing of the Bread broken and the Wine powred in For Christ gaue not the same to his Disciples that they should distribute but that they should receyue that which was distributed e Mat. 26.26.27 Mar. 14.22 Luc. 22.56 because they were in that Supper not the dispensers of Gods Mysteries but the Guestes But Christ as being the Feast-maker with one labour instituted and with his owne hands dispensed the Sacrament of his Grace and withall sanctified the Ministeriall dispensation thereof And all these Actions are Sacramentall and ought diligently to be considered as farre forth as they are vsed for the signifying and sealing of Spirituall things by divine Institution To these Actions that wee may come to the second part of the Institution Christ added Words whereof some include a Commaundement some a Promise and lastly some an Explication These in Schooles haue vsually been tearmed Preceptiue the other Definitiue and Sacramentall Lastly these Expositiue The Words Preceptiue are those by which hee hath injoyned both vpon the dispensers a necessity of their administration and vpon the communicants a necessity of taking and hath prescribed vnto both a forme of both Administration by his deed whereof we haue aboue spoken and by his commaundement of Imitation ioyned therevnto e Mat. 2 6 26. 1. Cor. 11.24 Of Communicating by a double Precept by the one To take by the other To eate and to drinke The Taking is a Sacramentall Rite prescribed to him that commeth to the Lords Table whereby wee receyue with our hand the Bread and Cuppe of Thanksgiving for it cannot bee gathered eyther from the Story of the Institution of the Lordes Supper oâ— froÌ„ the fashion of Christs sitting down and his Apostles that Christ in the first Supper did put those signes into the mouth of every of the Apostles by which
Instrumentall beginning thereof In Defence of the Efficient Cause of Actuall Sinne. I. IN Actuall Sinne there are two thinges Being and Iniquitie Of Being God is the Author and Principall Efficient of Iniquity the Will of Man II. A Thing is sayde to be done by Gods permission two wayes eyther by it selfe or by Accident That which is done God permitting it by it selfe hath the respect of good but that which is done by Accident God permitting the selfe same in respect of God permitting it by accident is evill because God permitteth not evill as it is evill but as it is a meane of his glory In Defence of the Matter of the first SINNE That the first Sinne was not Pryde but vnbeliefe against Bellarmine Lib. 3. de Amiss Gratiae Cap. 5. 6. I. EEccles 10.14 There is a fallacy of the sense or vnderstanding of the word For Pride is not the beginning or cause of backe-sliding or departing from God but on the contrary the very backe-sliding departing from God which is comprehended in vnbeliefe is made the beginning and cause of pride II. TO b. 4. Ans The place treateth not of the order of diverse actes in the first sinne but of the Effect of Pride to witte Perdition the beginning whereof is truely and properly attributed to Pride yet not exclusiuely III. ROm. 5. Ans Disobedience comprehendeth the whole Sinne of Adam to witte the violating or breaking of Gods commaundement which if it should bee resolved into it owne parts the first shall bee not Pride but vnbeliefe IIII. THe Testimonies of the Fathers which are alleadged eyther do not â—reate of the order of the first sinne â—ut of the next Adjunct thereof or Synecdochically they vnderstand by pride vnbeliefe it selfe as the immediate â—ause thereof V. THe inner actions are two wayes discerned eyther in respect of the Inâ—ention or in respect of the execution whereof the one properly respecteth the end the other the meanes but when there is speech made of the first sinne it is not inquired what was the first thing in the intention of Adam Eue but what was the first act of committing the Sinne. In Defence of the matter of Original Sin That Originall Sin is a quality or Concupiscence against Bellar. Lib. 5. cap 15. I. THe Positiue cause of original Sin is held to be three-fold the First the actuall sinne of Adam Secondly the Law of Nature originally passing the third the Iustice of God II. THe positiue quality is traÌ„sferred to the posterity after the same manner as the Sinne it selfe is not as a certaine accident of nature concreated or together with it created which should follow or accompany the substance by it self but as a whole corruption of the whole maÌ„ which hath a foundation in Adam as in the first instrument of nature it selfe neyther are the habits gotten convayed into the ofspring as they are personall but as in the name of the whole Nature one for all gotte them III. IN Concupiscence two things concurre the very Act of lusting or coveting which by it selfe is not evil and the deformity of that act of that God is the Author of this he must by no meanes bee the Author IIII. THe first sinne was not onely the sinne of the Body but also of the Soule Wherefore it was not onely the eating of the fruit forbidden but also vnbeliefe and pride in the soule and so whole Sinne is transmitted into body and soule not onely by the law of generation by which man formeth or yeeldeth forth man but also according to the corruption of him that generateth wherby man as hee is corrupt begeteth corrupt man V. THe Quality was not diminished both because then it passed as it were into another nature as also because it cannot eyther bee diminished or abolished but by the singular grace of God VI. THe Concupiscence of the Flesh against the Spirite doth not onely signifie those first motions voyde of consent but also the very roote of evill and the whole corruption which is not onely of the coveting but also of the other faculties of the Soule VII ORiginall Sinne is taken away in this life by the regeneration of Baptisme not that it might not be but that it might not be imputed for sinne In Defence of the matter of Actual sinne against the distinction of Sinne Veniall and Mortall Bellar. Lib. 1. Cap. 9.10 I. THe Testimonies of Scripture doe not proue or confirme the Verity of the distinction according to the mind of the adversary Not the First Mat. 5. for hee treateth of the inequality not onely of sinnes but also of punishments by an allusion to civill or politicke punishments Not the Second Mat. 23. for hee treateth of the nature of Hypocrites who being carefull in small matters doe openly neglect the chiefest things and make not a difference betweene those things which by themselues and alwayes are necessary and those whereof not the want but the contempt doth make vs guilty or culpable Not the Third Luc. 6. for he treateth of them who hunt after prayse by the reprehending of others but doe neyther know nor reproue themselues being in others very quicke sighted but in themselues blind Not the Fourth Luc. 12. for hee speaketh of the duety of loue towardes our neighbour whereby wee are bound after the example of Gods goodnesse to forgiue even the least sinnes Not the Fift 1. Cor. 3. for hee speaketh of doctrine and the manner of teaching that by a supposition applyed to the Doctors of the Corinthians Not the Sixt Iac. 1. for hee speaketh of the degrees of sinnes which are three Vitiousnesse a vitious motion and vitious action And of all these Death is made the reward or wages Not the two Last Math. 12. for hee speaketh of the nature of Sinnes even the least or lightest for which notwithstanding we are presented guilty before God Eph. 5. because both the heavinesse of sinnes and the effect of the same are expounded Synecdochically II. THe Testimonies of Councels and Fathers are either suspected or in controversie as of the Tridentine Councell and of the Popes both Pius and Gregorie or doe treat of the inequality and divers degrees of sins as the Councell of Milevitum and of the Fathers Augustine Origen Chrysostome and Hierome III. THe reasons which are alleadged proue nothing Not the first because it is grounded vpon a double false presupposall Vppon the one that sinnes in the faithfull are not mortall For the Wages of Sinne of whatsoever manner it be vnlesse it bee forgiven is Death Vpon the oâ—her that the sinnes of the faithfull are lighter then the sinnes of the vnfaithfull and so in their Nature Veniall For in that sinnes are Veniall in the faithfull it is not from the nature of the sinnes but from the Grace of God and in that they are not so in the vnfaithfull it is not from God but from the nature both of the sinnes and sinners Not the Second because Sinne is not sayde
to be Veniall or pardonable for that it is worthy of pardon but for that God vouchsafeth pardon to the Sinne and the Sinner Not the Third because it is false both that Sinne is Veniall of it own nature and that any the least Sinne should not bee against Charity For it is the transgression of the Law the ende whereof is Loue. Not the Fourth because the Nature or consideration of man offended is one and of God is another for according to the party offended the greatenesse of the offence is esteemed Not the Fift for no sinne is vnperfect because every sinne is a perfect iniquity though there bee degrees of this perfection Not the Sixt because though all sins doe not exclude charity yet they offend Now in that they exclude not or are veniall to the faithfull we must impute it not to sinne it selfe but to Gods mercy in Christ OF FREE WILL. The Part Confirming CAP. V. NOw after the Condition of man vnder Sinne followeth the consideration of humane strength which after Sinne remayned in man and is commonly and vsually expounded and noted by the Name of Free-Will But it is needefull we discerne the nature of this Doctrine three manner of wayes First commonly and absolutely according to the causes thereof Secondly in Particular according to the state and condition of man being a Sinner Thirdly respectiuely and comparatiuely according to the diverse estate of Man out of the State of Sinne whether of his Integrity or redemption or glory Commonly and Absolutely Free-will is defined to bee a naturall power or faculty of the Soule by it owne and proper motion without coaction or forcing to chuse or refuse the good or the evill which is proposed or offered to the will by the mind or vnderstanding to bee chosen or refused The Efficient Cause of this Free-will is vsually two wayes distinguished For one is Primary and another Neerest The Primary or Principall is God the beginning not onely of every good in nature but also of Nature it selfe and of the faculties and functions thereof a Gen. 45.8 Pro. 16.1 Ier. 10.23 Phil. 2.13 The Neerest is Free-will it selfe that is the will of mā which by judgement of reason going before of it owne accord choosing imbraceth or refusing shunneth that which was objected by the mind b Esa 1.19.20 Mat. 23.37 1. Kin. 3.5 Of this will there is vsually had a double consideration the one as touching the Speciall the other as touching the Operation As touching the speciall it is sayed to bee a faculty of willing or nilling as touching the Operation it is sayde to bee a function or action of that faculty eyther improperly occupied about the ends or properly about the meanes that tend to the ends The Matter hath the nature eyther of a Subiect or Obiect That which hath the nature of a Subiect as in this place we consider it is a substance created intelligent indued with reason wherein namely the vnderstanding and will are the essentiall parts proportionally but freedome is sayde to consist or be in these parts as the separable accident in the Subject That which is of the Obiect is generally all that which is put or consisteth in election or choice But specially it is the moral good or evil whervnto the will of the Creature is freely carried or which it freely escheweth And as touching Free-will in the cause of Naturall good the question is more Philosophicall then Divine The Forme of Free-will is the very freedome of the mind or of the Electiue will which for learning sake must three wayes be distinguished known For there is one freedome in the Subject another to the Object and lastly another from the lett that crosseth the same which three it is needefull that wee know for the making of this Forme and for the condition of mans Free-will First there is required freedome in the Subiect that is in the will it selfe which from her inward beginning worketh alwayes freely and that by reason of it owne nature according to which a free necessity of willing is laide vpon it So that it is not to bee called a Will which is bereft of this Freedome For the wil hath such a reciprocacy with Freedome as with it owne Essentiall property Then there is required freedome to the Obiect eyther to both opposite by way of disjunction to witte eyther morall good or morall evill whereof the one is chosen or refused before or rather then the other or to eyther of thē when onely one is offered to be taken or refused Lastly there is required freedome from the let that crosseth For the wil of man is freede from compulsion and from necessity From Compulsion for what it doth it doth the same of it owne accord From Necessity for albeit in respect of the Speciall it be necessarily limited to doe eyther good only or evill onely or both yet by it own inward power it freely limiteth it selfe to the bringing forth of it owne act yet it is needefull that both manners of Freedome be distinguished First from the Freedome of right and secondly from the Freedome of slavery That nature hath denied to man This the corruption of nature He hath not freedome of right who of due is Subject to another and according to the will of the same liueth is moved and worketh c Pro. 21.1 Act. 2.23 Wherefore all selfe power or liberty ought to bee given and assigned to God alone he hath not freedome from slavery who through his owne fault hath made himselfe a slaue to sinne and the tyranny thereof d Ioh. 8.34 The End is the glory of God in his Iustice and mercy and the Salvation or inexcusablenesse of man Particularly in the state of Corruption Free will is defined to be a naturall faculty and power freely and without coaction to chuse and performe the evill which by the mind is offered to the will to be chosen and performed The Efficient Primarie Cause is God both in respect of the Will and the freedome it selfe as being the Author and beginning of both as touching the naturall state thereof The neerest cause are the mind and will of man so farre forth as both by corruption of nature are averted from good and converted to evill and the vnderstanding verily proposeth and iudgeth falshood for truth and the will chuseth and followeth the evill in stead of the good c T it 1.15 1 Cor. 2.14 Rom. 8.7 Rom. 5.6 2. Tim. 2.26 The Matter as it is considered in the Subiect is the naturall or carnal man but as in the obiect it is the evill vnto which the actions of both faculties are carried Now the Evill whether you referre it to the inward or to the outwarde actions wee two wayes consider absolutely and in it selfe or Relatiuely as having reference to another thing The Evill absolutely is that which is strictly forbidden of God Relatiuely is that which is evill in the obiect circumstances and end that is which