and confine Countries and that one of their Preachers who was burnt at Vienna had affirmed that above 80000. embraced the same doctrine within those Provinces and another named Lombard who was taken and burnt at Colein avowed that there were many of his Religion within and about that City and from those dregs saith he Bohemia is infected with these errors until this day But it was made known unto all the world what was the doctrine of the Bohemians at Constance and Basil Antonin par 3. tit 21. cap. 5. saith Many of them were burnt in many parts of the world especially Picenum or Marca Anconitana was full of them and also Florence whence many were exiled and spread themselves even unto Greece He called the Emperor Lewis a follower of them he saith Jo. Castillioneus and Francis Hacutara two Franciscans were burnt for the same doctrines Pa. Aemilius saith Under Charls the fair King of France were sublime engines and most learned men among them were some truly holy and others striving foolishly to exceed others kept no measure and became wicked and it is uncertain to guess of the judgement and manners of some the evils of the time were grievous to good men who mourned secretly P. Mornay in Myster pag. 440 454. About the year 1340. Conrade Hager who was a Preacher at Wortzburgh the space of twenty four years taught The Mass is not a sacrifice nor available to quick nor dead and money given for Masses is very robbery and sacriledge of Priests And certainly as he condemned the false sacrifice he declared the true For such doctrine he was imprisoned Fox in Act. out of the Register of Otho the VI. of Herbi An. 1390. twenty four Citizens of Mentz were burnt at Binga for the doctrine of the Valdenses Masseus speaketh of more then twenty who were burnt in Province at Narbon because they would not acknowledge the Roman Decretals and called them contrary unto Scriptures 8. There is an ancient record poetically compiled of the date or year An apology of a wolf fox and ass 1343. under the name Poenitentiari Asini there a fox a wolf and an ass are said to shrieve one another first the wolf confesseth unto the fox and was absolved easily then the wolf heareth the confession of the fox and sheweth him the like favor and lastly the ass confesseth that being hungry he took a straw out of a sheave of corn that was upon an horses back going in pilgrimage unto Rome he professeth repentance for the fault yet thinking that it was not so hainous as the faults of the other two he was confident of remission but discipline was sharply executed upon him he was condemned and slain By the wolf was meant the Pope and the fox resembled the Priests these do easily absolve one another but the Laicks who were meant by the ass must suffer sharp censure namely if the German Emperor come under inquisition he must be deprived though the cause be but like a straw yet the wolf saith It is a great crime So they exaugurating the escapes of the Laicks they flie upon them and devour them Fox in Act. 9. Francis Petrarcha a Florentine was Arch-Deacon of Parma about A description of the Roman Church the year 1350. a noble Poet and honored with a Poetical Crown in the Capitole in presence of the Nobility and people of Rome Platin. In his Latine Epistles which are full of gravity and zeal he declareth his minde concerning the present condition of the Church especially in those that have no title In Epist 8. he saith Whatsoever is spoken of the Assyrian or Egyptian Babylon whatsoever is written of the Labyrinth of Avernus of Tartarus and the sulphurous Lakes are but trifles in comparison of what we see now here is terrible Nimrod and Semiramis here is fearful Rhadamantus and greedy Cerberus here is Pasiphae lying under Taurus and that two natured Minotaur briefly you may see whatsoever confused thing And in Epist 9. he calleth himself a pilgrim of Jerusalem about the rivers of Babylon In Epist 10. you do marvel at the superscription of my Epistles and not without cause seeing thou hast read of two Babylons only ...... but marvel not there is a third Babylon in our quarters where can a city of confusion be said to be more justly then in the West who built it I know not but it is well known who dwell in her surely they from whom she hath her name and if thou wilt believe here is Nimrod potent in the earth climbing into the Heavens against the Lord ...... here is Cambyses more furious then he in the East or then the Turk In Epist 16. he sheweth the dangers of good men and lovers of truth and then saith Seeing without the Kingdom of vertue silly and naked truth is deprived of all aid what thinkest thou will be where all vertue is dead and buried surely there truth is the greatest crime and falleth under the hatred of many because all must hunt after the love of one man .... where is no piety no charity nor faith where pride envy avarice and luxury do reign where the worst are promoted and the bribing villain is exalted to Heaven but the just and poor are oppressed where simplicity is termed foolishness and malice is wisdom where God is contemned money is worshipped Laws are trodden under foot and good men have been so abused that now not a good man can be seen I would gladly exempt one from this deluge of sin and I confess he may deserve it but it is a scorn to except one therefore no Noah no Deucaleon shall escape and lest the woman be thought more happy no Parrha shall swim forth this City is drowned with a deluge of filthy lusts and with an uncredible torrent of wickedness ...... Unto this Epistle I have affixed neither my hand nor ring nor time thou knowest the voice of the speaker and where I am In Epist 16. he congratulateth a friend for leaving the Pope's Court then he saith If there may be any true presage the God of vengeance is at hand the Lord will freely deal his just reward unto the insolently proud is their own vengeance ... I remember what long since I said unto one who among very evil men was the best of our number and to whom thou art joyned in blood and I by acquaintance that a last day is approaching unto that Order when their pride shall fall the patience of God and man being wearied out and when he between stubbornness and derision did wish unto me the blindeness of Tiresias and objected the words Simon I have prayed for thee ...... and I replied that I spake not of the defection of faith but of the ruine of them who destroy the faith ....... then he said in earnest Hold thy peace although it be true yet let not us be the Authors ...... whether they will or not all things have their own time and the end of
and Lordships and if any wise man gain-say the open errors of Antichrist and teach men to give their alms to poor needy men to escape the pains of Hell and to gain the bliss of Heaven he shall be imprisoned as a man of unchristian belief and traitor to God and Christian Kings and Lords And whereas King Hezekiah was busie to cleanse God's house and put away all uncleanness from the Sanctuary ..... some Christians Lords in name and Heathens in conditions defile the Sanctuary of God and bring in simoniacal Clarks full of covetousness and heresie and hypocrisie and malice to stop God's Law that it be not known and kept or freely preached and some Christian Lords keep many Prelats and Curats in their Courts and in secular offices openly against God's Law and mans and withhold them from their ghostly office and helping of Christian souls ...... let these unwise Lords know that Eli the Prophet one only had the truth of God and King Ahab with 850 Priests and Prophets of Baal had the false part and after Micheas one alone Prophet of God had the truth against 400 Prophets of Baal that counselled Achab to war to his own shame and death so now a few poor men and Idiots in comparison of School-Clarks may have the truth of holy Scripture against many thousand Prelates and religious that be given to worldly pride covetousness simony hypocrisie and other fleshly sins and the rather seeing poor men desire only the truth and freedom of the holy Gospel and Scripture and accept mans law and ordinances only in as much as they be grounded on holy Scripture or good reason and common profit of Christian people ...... But it is to be feared full sorely that Kings and Lords now have been in the former sins of Manasses God grant that they repent verily and make amends to God and man as he did in the end And near the end of that Chapter he saith Now in England it is a common protection against persecution of Prelates and some Lords if a man be accustomed to swear needless false and unadvised oaths by the bones nails and sides and other members of Christ and be proud and letcherous and speak not of God's Law and reprove not sin about him and to abstain from needless oaths and not lawful and to reprove sin by way of charity is cause enough why Prelates and some Lords slander men and call them Lollards Hereticks raisers of debate and treason against the King ...... How much blood have Lords shed in wars for pride and covetousness by counsel of false Prelates Confessors and Preachers it passeth mans wit to tell fully in this life but of shedding blood and slaying poor men by withdrawing alms and giving it to dead stocks or stones or to rich Clarks and feigned religious were to speak now if a man had the spirit of ghostly strength now men kneel and pray and offer fasts to dead Images that have neither hunger nor cold and despise beat and slay Christian men what honoring of God is this c. The Bishops and Friers could not endure such doctrine but so long as Edward the III. lived he was safe for that King loved him and as some write the above named Acts were by his information máde against the Pope and Prelates when the King became old and unable his second Son John Duke of Lancaster was Regent for the King 's eldest Son was dead and his Son Richard was yong he approved the doctrine of Christ which Wickliff did teach so did Henry Percey Lord Marshal William Rigge Chancellor of the University and many more of account Simon Langham Arch-Bishop of Canterbury summoned him to appear at Lambeth An. 1376. The Duke of Lancaster went with him and the contention was great yet nothing was done against him at that time In the beginning of the reign of Richard the II. John the Regent and the Lord Marshal gave up their Offices then the Bishops thought to have the more advantage against Wickliff Nevertheless he continued preaching 1. The holy Eucharist after consecration is not the body of Christ but figuratively or sacramentally 2. The Church of Rome is not the head of all Churches nor had Peter any more power given him by Christ then any other Apostle had 3. The Pope hath no more power of the keys then any other within the order of Priesthood hath 4. If God be temporal Princes may lawfully and justly take their temporalities from Church-men sinning habitualiter 5. The Gospel is a rule sufficient by it self to rule the life of all Christians here c. These and such other Articles were brought to Pope Gregory the XI by him and twenty three Cardinals they were condemned as heretical And the Pope sent his Bulls unto the University to Simon the Arch-Bishop and unto the Bishop of London that they should apprehend the Heretick as he spoke he wrote also unto the King to assist the Bishops A convocation was held at Lambeth where Wickliff appeared professing himself to be a true Christian he explained the Articles and he denied some to be his assertions saying they had wrested his words At that time whether the Queen-Mother had discharged the Bishops to do him violence as some write or that the Londoners took his part as others say or both he was dismissed only they charged him that he should preach no more of that doctrine The Schism of the Antipopes gave some respite unto Wickliff and Simon was slain in a dissension between the Nobility and the Commons His Successor William Courtney was more fully against him and prevailed so with the King to banish him and in the fifth year of the yong King procured an Act that Hereticks as it pleased them to speak should be imprisoned until they justified their cause This Act mentioneth great numbers of them throughout all the Kingdom convening to Sermons in Churches Church-yards Market-places and other places where are great assemblings of people Philip Repington a Batchelor of Divinity had been summoned for the same doctrine but after this Act he forsook it and became Bishop of Lincoln and a cruel persecutor of the truth which he had professed John Ashton also fell away Nicolas Herford another Batchelor made his appeal from the Bishop unto the King and his Council but William caused him to be apprehended and imprisoned he escaped and continued preaching as before John Wickliff in the time of his banishment wrote unto Pope Urban a confession of his faith wherein he affirmeth that seeing the Bishop of Rome calleth himself the Vicar of Christ of all men he is most bound to follow the Law of Christ in the Gospel since the greatness among Christ's Disciples consisteth not in worldly honors but in exact imitation of Christ in life and doctrine and he advised the Pope to leave unto the Secular Powers all temporal rule as Christ did and he prayed that he and his Cardinals might follow the Lord Jesus and faithfully teach
decent union in Christ of twoe persons man and woman keeping a chast bed without breach and it is a signe of a great truth to wit the coupling of Christ with the Church and a believing soul By faith wee affirme that if God give a contrite and humbled heart for sin unto a falling sinner having the true faith of Christ and if with heart and mind and really he repent of his former sins such a one being so truly disposed if he find a presbyter able to discerne good from evill and whose lips preserve the knowledge of Gods law he should reveale uprightly unto such a priest his sins by confession by whom as a judge ruling in stead of God and the Church according to the law of the Lord the weight of the fault may be rightly discerned to the end he may be ashamed and being corrected he may have advice of repentance unto reformation of himself and being either loosed or bound by Christs keyes he may obey humbly and that such humble contrition of the heart is a sacrament that is a signe of true grace bestowed on the repentant But if there be not a heart contrite humbled through faith abhorring vice and an afflicted Spirit embracing the will of God and also confession with relaxation of the fault and moreover if fained satisfaction be added wee pronounce it to be a vain signe and void of the grace of Christ The anointing of the sicke containes two things in it first a cause of a more ready approaching unto the diseased for this it is not a sacrament the other is the thing signified by that unction which is given by God in Christ for which thing prayer especially should be made in true faith that it may be given unto the sick believer as blessed James commandeth saying Is any sick among you let him call for the Elders of the Church and let them pray for him anointing him in the name of God and the prayer of the faithfull shall save him and the Lord wil relieve him and if he be in sins they shall be forgiven him By faith of the sick the signe of unction assures him of the forgiveness of sins When wee have declared the faith of the Catholick Church and her truth by which truth holiness is given unto her it remaines to declare by the same certainty of faith the communion of Saints The communion of the Saints is when the members of the Holy Church doe for common benefite use the good free saving and administring grace of God which is given without repentance and they exercise themselves according to the grace of God given unto them to the common utility of others It is cleare then that the elect only are partakers of true faith grace and righteousness in Christ by his merite unto the glory of eternall salvation as also they receive the sacraments to the evidence of faith albeit they have been seduced yet damnation shall not ceize upon them But the wicked of unformed faith albeit they communicate truly in the Sacraments digniries administrations and publick manners if they he destitute of true faith they communicate unworthily as hypocrites and if they follow the erroneous by their leading they fall into seduction and deceit By faith of Christs grace wee pronounce freely that who communicateth with a lively faith by the same he attaineth through Christ true remission of his sins and also because he partaketh of the Sacraments of the Church he getteth by the same faith and certainty the relaxation of crimes and at the time of the last judgement in the resurrection the glorification of his soul Amen The Letter which they sent with this Confession is worthy of reading But for brevity I omit it When the Confession was delivered their adversaries ceased not to accuse them still as if they had writen otherwise then they did believe or practize and so the King went on in cruelty against them Wherefore they sent another Apologie where in they tooke God to witness of the injuries done unto them by their adversaries and that they had writenin singleness of heatt nor did their tongue dare to speak what their heart did not believe There also they expresse them selves more clearly in some particulares as concerning the Eucharist they say Wee do not only believe and confesse that the bread is the naturall bodie and the wine is the naturall blood sacramentally but also that the bread is the Spirituall bodie and the wine is the Spirituall blood And to believe this we are induced by the saying of the Apostle Paul The bread which we break is it not the communion of the body of Christ and the cup ..... for wee that are many are one bread and one bodie for wee are partakers of one bread and of one cup ...... The Redeemer of mankind hath commanded to take eate and to doe that in remembrance of him but no command is given unto believers to worship the sacramental subsistence of Christ's body and blood for Christ gave unto his disciples sitting what they should use and they obeying him did eat and drink but did not worship the sacrament And the Apostles and their successours for a long space of time went to the houses of believers and break the bread with joy and certainly they did not worship the sacrament nor in so doing did they erre nor were called hereticks But they did worship the personall subsistence of Christ at the right hand of the Father And unto the true worshippers of the Divine Majesty it is commanded in both the Testaments the old and new to worship and adore Christ very God and Man not in the sacramentall existence but in his naturall and personall subsistence at the right hand of his Father For the old Testament as the triumpher over Satan tempting him remembreth saith It is wrtiten Thou shall worship the Lord thy God and him only shall thou serve The vessell of election explaines the New when he saith God hath exalted him and given him a name which is a bove every name that at the name of JESUS every knee should bowe .... The incarnat truth confirmes this when he saith That all men should honour the Sonne as they honour the Father But none doeth worship the Father in any creature but only in heaven as that prayer published by Christ testifieth Our Father which art in heaven c. In the words following because they were accused that they did not worship the Virgine Mary nor the Saints they shew that they did esteem of the Virgine as blessed above all women not only for that she was sanctified but also for that the Sonne of God did assume a body of her body and they esteem of all them who were sanctified by faith in the grace of God through Christs merite and so as blessed of God they doe honour them with due honour they love them and would follow them but they can not give them more honour than Gods word directs them 10. When
Spiritual alliance did accurse the man who shall marry his god-mother Grego decreta 6. BONIFACE V. is said to have been a man of singular vertue and bountifulness especially toward those of the Clergy who were most vigilant in their calling He ordained that so great reverence should be had unto the Churches a refuge of impiety place of Gods worship that whosoever shall take his refuge into a Church should not be taken by force making the Law of God against murtherers and such ungodly men to be of no effect by his tradition because he loved them who bring saith I. Beda in Catal. Scriptor illust and that sacrilegious Except sacriledge persons should be accursed for he hateth them who take away In his time Testaments were of strength when they were confirmed by the Magistrates but his Successours would have this power to themselves His Epistles direct to England as in Beda's history wherein are sundry passages fighting against the perfection of Christ's satisfaction He sate 5. years and died an 622. 7. HONORIUS I. was a Monothelite Onuphrius in Annot. in Platin. A Pope condemned of heresie and Bellarmin de Ro. Pont. lib. 4. cap. 11. would purge him of this blot by the Epistles of a Monk Maximus and of Emanuel Caleca who lived about the year 1274. they cannot deny that they saw in the most common books of Councels this heresie imputed unto him in the sixth general Councel as also the Epistles of Sergius Bishop of Constantinople unto Honorius and of Honorius to Sergius were read in the twelfth Action or Session and in the sixteenth Action they both were accursed for that heresie and in the seventeenth a Confession was published contrary to the errour of the Monothelites and after the Confession Honorius Pope of old Rome is reckoned amongst the Hereticks see hereafter in Leo II. and some among the Romanists stick not to call him an Heretick as Melc Canus in loc Theol. li. 6. c. 8. Platina makes mention of his great care in building of Churches and transporting Ornaments from the Temple of Jupiter Capitolinus into the Church of St. Peter but nothing of his spiritual building He appointed Processions on the Lords day whence was the compassing of Churches Catal. test verit lib. 9. He sate 12. years and then the Seat was vacant 1. year and 7. months 8. SEVERINUS was confirmed by Isaacius Eparch of Ravenna Election of the Pope for at that time the Election of the Pope was naught till he were confirmed by the Emperour or his Eparch Platin. Isaacius came to Rome for confirmation of the Pope and saw great Treasure in the Lateran Church he took it all away because the Souldiers were in great necessity in time of the wars against the Saraâ—ens yet he gave only a part of it to the Souldiers and sent the rest to Ravenna whence he sent a part unto the Emperour like unto all other Popes Severinus was more carefull of houses then of souls Platin. He by Epistle reproves the Scots for observing Penticost or Easter on another day than the Church of Rome but his reproof had no place there because they were not accustomed with the yoke of the Romish Bishops saith Catal. test ver He sate 1. year 2. months Beda hist lib. 2. cap. 19. hath written None free of Original sin except our Saviour an Epistle at this time thus Unto the most learned and most holy the Scotch Bishops and Presbyters and other Doctours and Abbots Hilarius Arch Priest and keeping the place of the holy Apostolical See John a Deacon and chosen in the name of God and John Primicerius and holding the place of the Apostolical See and John a servant and counseller of the same Apostolical See The writings which the Bearers brought unto Pope Gregory of good memory he departing this life have not been answered till now Which being opened lest the mist of so great a question should continue ...... Hereby we know that the Pelagian heresie beginneth to revive among you wherefore we exhort you earnestly that so venemous a work of superstition be put from your minds for it cannot be unknown unto you how that execrable heresie is damned seeing it hath not only been abolished out this 240. years but it is also daily condemned by us by a perpetual anathema and is buried and we exhort that among you their ashes be not stirred up whose weapons are burnt For who will not abhor the proud and wicked attempts of them who say A man may be without sin by his proper will and not by the grace of God And indeed the first foolish saying of blasphemy is to say A man is without sin Which cannot be except the only Mediatour of God and Man Christ Jesus who was conceived and born without sin For other men being born with Original sin are known to bear the testimony of Adam's transgression even they who are without Actual sin according to the Prophet saying Behold I was conceived in iniquity and in sin hath my mother born me What may be collected out of this Epistle I leave unto all Judicious Readers only I would that this were remarked that in the inscription they observe the stile and phrase of the Roman Court directing their Letters unto the Scotch Bishops c. whereas neither at that time nor many ages thereafter was any Bishop in Scotland but only Abbots who were Doctours and Presbyters in several congregations 9. JOHN IV. bestows all the Treasure that Isaacius and Severine had left on the redeeming of some captives of his Nation Dalmatia and Istria from the Lombards He transports the bodies of Vincentius and Anastasius Reliques Martyres from Dalmatia to Rome from the hands of enemies to the superstition of a more eminent place In his time Lotharis King of the Lombards a good Justitiary and Arrian did permit in every City of his Kingdom two Bishops one Catholick as they spoke then or orthodox and another Arrian John sate 1. year 9. months 10. THEODORUS I. the son of Theodorus Bishop of Jerusalem Pretended authority availeth not strove against Paul Bishop of Constantinople because he was a Monothelite and sought his deprivation but in vain for he dealt by authority and not by Scriptures or reason and Paul despiseth his authority Lotharis said he was puft up with ambition and not inspired by a good spirit and therefore he contemned him also saying He fostereth many errours and reproved one only He disswadeth the Emperour Constans from the errour of the Monothelites therefore the Emperour sought his life Thereafter all his care was to adorn and adore the bodies of the departed Saints and their Reliques he died an 647. 11. MARTIN I. augmenteth the number of holy daies he commandeth New Rites the Priests to shave their hair continually and that each Bishop should consecrate the chrism or holy ode yearly and send it through all the Parishes of his Diocy and that all the Clergy should at their
in Scotland but they both made apostasie in the first year and were slain by Kedwalla Beda hist lib. 3. cap. 1. Oswald the second son of Ethelfrid succeeded unto them and overthrew Kedwalla Oswald did hold nothing so dear as to promote the Christian religion and sent unto Donal the 4. King of Scots for Preachers when Segenius was Abbot of Colmkill because the Scots language was not understood by his Saxons Oswald would often expound sentences or passages of their Sermons for in the time of his exile he had learned that language Amongst these Preachers the worthiest was Aidan the first Bishop of Lindsfarn he had no care of earthly things what was given him by the King or Potent men he was wont to part it amongst the poor at the first occasion He ceased not to go from town to town and from house to house not on horse but on foot alwaies catechizing whether he met with rich or poor if they were Pagans he taught them if they were Christians he confirmed them in the faith and exhorted unto the works of piety and charity especially to read the Scriptures diligently he died an 651. Beda lib. 3. cap. 4 5. From Northumberland the Word of God was spread among many others of the Saxon Kingdomes Pope Honorius sent Byrinus unto the West Saxons Ibid. cap. 7. Last of all Sussex or the South Saxons and the Isle of Wight were converted Fox in Act. moni Sigebert King of Essex had learned the Christian faith in France and opened the first School in Cambridge an 636. Paul Iovius in Angl. reg Chron. He was perswaded by his Monks to enter into a Cloister as if it had been a shame or sin to reign with David his end was lamentable for when he had given over his Kingdom to his cousin Egrik the fore-named Penda entred his Kingdom with an army his Subjects forced him to go into the fields where both he and Egrik were slain an 652. His son Penda was baptized by Finnan and accepted as a Bishop and Presbyter from him for instructing his Subjects Beda lib. 3. cap. 21. 4. Ferchard II. King of the Scots was odious to all his Subjects for his A despiser of admonition brought to repentance impiety against God cruelty against men for covetousness and drunkenness he spared not the life of his own wife and defiled his two daughters Herefore he was separated from the Communion of the Church and the Nobility did speak of putting him to death or to do unto him as they had done to Ferchard the I. But the fore-named Colman stayed them and assured them before him that God would shortly punish him Within few daies as he was hunting a Wolf did bite him and he became aguish and then vermin did consume his body Then he with tears did confess that he had deserved all these things for vilipending the admonitions of Colman Who said he should be of good courage and trust in God whose mercy is greater to a penitent sinner then any sin of man can let him To shew his repentance Ferchard caused to cover his bed with course coverlets and carry him abroad where he might make publick confession of his sins he died an 664. Boet. hist lib. 9. cap. 21. 5. From Colmkill as a most famous Seminary of learning at that time Famous men of Britain sprang forth not only who did resist the beginnings of Antichristian pride at home and in our neighbour country but they sowed the seed of the Gospel in other Nations Such was that famous Rumold about the year 600. who was called Mechliniensis Apostolus Gallus brought Helvetia from Paganism and as Pappus in histor convers gent. witnesseth built sundry Monasteries there Columban a man of excellent holiness and learning saith Trithe lived sometime in Bangor in Ireland and thence went into Burgundy where he began the Monastery Luxovien and taught the Monks of his own Country especially to live by the works of their own hands Bernard in Vita Malachiae cap. 5. Afterwards because he rebuked Theodorick for his leacherous life he was forced to flee and visited sundry parts of Germany thence he went into Italy and began another Abbey on the Apennin Hills beside Bobium in Tuscany Platin. in Bonifac. 4. Levin was industrious for the name of Christ about the year 630. he turned many to the faith about Ghent and Esca but some hardned person killed him he was held in such reverence that 200. years after his death his body as a holy monument was carried from Church to Church and at last an 1007. it was layed in the Church of Saint Bavo in Ghent Furseus and his brother Fullan with two Presbyters Gobban and Dicul obtained land from Sigebert King of Essex and built the Abbey of Cnobsherburg then bewailing the oppression of that country by Penda he commendeth the charge of that Monastery unto his brother and passing into France he began the Abbey at Latiniac where he died He was famous for his piety and Beda lib. 3. cap. 19. speaks of his visions and miracles Diuma was ordained first Bishop of Mercior where he converted many unto the faith in the reign of the Christian Penda and for rare gifts the Bishoprick of Middlesex was committed to his charge ib. cap. 21. unto whom succeeded Cella a Scot. Also Florentius went to Argentine or Strawsburg and was the first Bishop thereof he opened the first School in Alsatia about the year 669. he is said by his prayers to have restored Rathildis the daughter of Dagobert King of France unto her sight and tongue whereas she had been both blind and dumb Chilian or Kilian the first Bishop of Herbipolis or Wortsburg did first instruct the people of East France saith Bale or high Germany as Io. Pappus speaketh in the Christian faith an 668. because he rebuked Gosbert Prince of Herbipolis first privately but in vain then publickly for having his brothers wife Geilana she caused him to be slain Colonata a Priest and Thotnat a Deacon followed him in all his travels and were put to death with him Burcard or Rurcard succeeded after him to whom Pipin gave a Dukedom and from hence among all the Bishops of Germany only the Bishop of Herbipolis carrieth a Sword and Priest's Gown in his badge Hen. Oraeus in Nomencla Unto these Scots Io. Pappus joineth some Britans as Willibrod Reformer of Frisia and two brethren Evaldi the one surnamed the Black and the other the White D. Morton in his Appeal seems to doubt what doctrine they did teach because of the diverse opinions concerning them they lived about the year 689. yet Io. Pappus saith plainly They converted the Westphalians to the Christian faith and suffered martyrdom neer Breme Io. Bale sheweth their death the barbarous people slue the younger with the edge of the sword and they tormented the elder with a lingring death and pulled in sunder his members and at last threw them both into the River 6. Pope Agathosent
of virginity be commended so that the humility of marriage be not despised Catal. test ver lib. 9. Trithem in Catal. Illustr saith that he writ of redemption superfluously even to the salvation of Reprobates Here Trithem doth him wrong as appears by the book it self which was Printed lately at Rotterdam with a Preface of the learned Doctor Rivet or Renatus Deviraeus who hath a part of his XXX Epistle written unto Gotteschalk answering unto that question Whether we shall after resurrection behold God with bodily ey Here he commendeth the modesty of Augustine and denieth that God can be seen in his substance which priviledge is reserved unto the Spirit and then he saith Though I pay my debt of love unto thee much respected brother I cannot fully discharge it but I exhort thee that thou spend not thy spirits any more on such questions lest being taken up with them more than is needfull thou be less able to search and teach profitable things ...... In the mean time let us walk in the most large field of holy Scriptures and give our selves wholly unto the meditation of them and seek the Lord's face humbly piously and continually for no good shall be lacking unto them who seek him Then that Preface shews that this Abbot was not Authour of that Book which Trithemius and others do call his but another Lupus who did live at the same time to wit 20. Lupus Servatus a Benedictine in the Abbey of Saint Amand in the Diocy of Tornac writ a Treatise of free-will predestination and of the price of Christ's blood The sum of that Treatise the Authour did collect in an Epistle unto King Charls the Bald who had commanded him to write on that subject His words are God made Adam upright as the holy Scripture teacheth and in him he created us all originally upright this father of mankind forsaking natural uprightness none forcing him did sin so grievously that himself and in him he condemned us all which are begotten of both sexes God therefore made human nature excellently good but man hath corrupted it miserably by his spontaneous fault Adam was then as saith blessed Ambrose and we all were in him but Adam perished and we all perished in him Let us praise God's work and confess that nothing but punishment is due unto our fault But God to whom all things which were are and which are to come are present for he is what he is nor can be any addition or diminution of his knowledge seeing he fore-knew the whole mass of mankind to be corrupted with sin would not hold from it the good of his creation seeing he could use well even evil things and before the foundation of the world he did chuse out of that mass whom by grace he would deliver from deserved punishment as the Apostle saith As he hath chosen us before the foundation of the World But others on whom he vouchsafes not this grace of mercy he in just judgment leaveth them in damnation which they have deserved by sin And thus as the Apostle saith he hath mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardneth He shews mercy on such whom he assumeth by grace and he hardneth those whom he doth not mollifie by the same grace but howbeit in hid yet in just judgment he leaveth them Those then on whom he shews mercy are predestinated for glory as the Apostle saith Whom he hath foreknown he hath predestinated and they are called the vessels of honour These do ow unto him what they are and what they have because they are made by his goodness when before they were not and of his bountifulness they are saved when they were lost But those whom he hardneth that is whom he softneth not which are left in damnation which they have originally and actually deserved are called vessels fitted unto contumely and prepared for destruction That those are created it is the good gift of God and that they are punished it is their own evil Blessed Augustine in many of his books and especially in that he writ last doubteth not to say that they ar predestinated to punishment not meaning a fatal necessity on them which shall perish but the unchangeable desertion of them which are forsaken For he had read If God shut up a man who shall open unto him And also consider the works of God that none can correct what he hath despised And that also I have given them over into the desires of their hearts and they shall walk in their own devices And I think he was led into this thought especially by that testimony concerning God Which made what was to come And to whom it is said Thou wilt give to every one according to their works which indeed he will do to each one except whom he blesseth by forgiving their iniquities and hiding their sins which advancing his grace with highest praises can say He deals not with us according to our sins nor rewardeth us according to our iniquities With Augustine do in other words agree Jerom Gregory Beda Isidore ... as I could easily demonstrate Certainly the first man did by sinning lose free-will in good which he did despise and he holds it in evil which he chose But as if a man willeth he can kill himself by with-holding food from himself but when he is killed he cannot make himself to live so man could willingly lose the use of free-will in good by forsaking it but he cannot resume it by his own strength even although he would therefore he shall not have free-will in good unless it be made free by the grace of God Our Lord Jesus which knew as it is written what is in man declareth this soundly when he said Without me ye can do nothing to wit no good thing for he cannot be the Authour nor co-worker of ill who as John Baptist saith is the Lamb of God and takes away the sins of the World to wit both which were and that they be not done And elsewhere If the Son shall make you free ye shall be truly free ..... God's grace preveneth us as it is written My God his mercy shall prevene me that we may both will and begin and his grace followeth us as it is written Thy mercy shall follow me that in vain we will not or begin These then are principally of God as is clear by these testimonies and but consequently ours because they are done by us willingly as it is written Lord thou wilt give us peace for thou workest all our works unto us ....... Lastly whom God hath redeemed by his blood it is learned by the Gospel In Matthew the Lord saith Drink ye all of this for this is my blood of the new Testament which shall be shed for many for remission of sins And in Mark This is my blood of the new Testament which shall be shed for many But in Luke This is the new Testament of my blood which shall be shed for you Then two
necessity that he could not be otherwise but that He in his Almighty and unchangeable Majesty as he knows all things ere they be did foreknow that the wicked were to be such of their own will Nor do we beleeve that any is condemned in His prejudice but according to the merit of their own iniquity nor that the wicked do perish because they could not be good but because they would not be good and through their own fault continue in the mass of perdition or original and actual sin Ca. 3. But concerning the Predestination of God it pleaseth and faithfully doth please according to the authority of the Apostle saying Hath not the Potter power over the clay to make of the same mass one vessel unto honour and another unto dis-honour We confidently confess the predestination of the elect unto life and predestination of the wicked unto death and in the election of them who are to be saved the mercy of God precedes the good merit but in the damnation of them who perish their wicked merit precedes the just judgment of God And in that predestination God hath only appointed what he was to do either in his gracious mercy or just judgment as the Scripture saith Which hath done what things were to be But in the wicked he foreknew their wickedness because it is of them and he did not predestinate it because it is not of him but because he knows all things which he did foreknow and because he is just he did predestinate the punishment that follows their merit for with him as Augustine saith is as well a fixed decree as a certain knowledge of every thing and hither belongs that saying of the Wise Man Judgments are prepared for the Scorners Prov. 19. Of this unchangeableness of the foreknowledge and predestination of God by which the future things are already done may that well be understood Eccles 3 I know whatsoever God doth it shall be for ever nothing can be put to it and nothing taken from it and God doth it that men should fear before him But that any are by the power of God predestinated unto evil as if they could not be otherwise We not only do not beleeve it but even if there be any which will beleeve such evil with all detestation as did the Arausicane Synod we say Anathema unto them Ca. 4. Item of the redemption of the blood of Christ because of so great an errour which hath begun in this point so that some as their writings declare define that it was shed even for the wicked which from the beginning unto the coming of Christ being dead in their wickedness are punished with everlasting damnation contrary to that of the Prophet O death I will be thy death and O grave I will be thy destruction it pleaseth us to hold and teach simply and faithfully according to Evangelical and Apostolical truth that this price was given for them of whom our Lord saith So must the Son of Man be lifted up that whosoever beleeves in him shall not perish but .... And the Apostle saith Christ was once offered to take away the sins of many And moreover the four Articles that were defined unadvisedly in the Synod of our brethren at Carisiac for their inutility are also errour contrary unto truth and likewise other things concluded foolishly in the 19 Syllogisms of John Scot and glorious with no secular literature although it be boasted otherwise in which rather the argument of the Divel then any argument of the faith is found we discharge them altogether from the hearing of Beleevers and by the authority of the Holy Ghost we inhibit them that those and such things be altogether shunned and we do judge that introducers of new things should be corrected lest they be smitten more severely Ca. 5. We believe that it should be held firmly that all the multitude of the faithfull is regenerated by the water and the Spirit and thereby truly incorporated into the Church and according to Apostolical doctrine are baptized into the death of Christ and washed in his blood because neither could be true regeneration in them unless there were also true redemption seeing in the Sacraments of the Church nothing is in vain and nothing in mockage but altogether all things are true and relieth upon its truth and sincerity And yet of that multitude of the faithfull and redeemed some are saved by eternal salvation because through the grace of God they continue faithfully in their redemption hearing in their hearts the voice of their Lord Matth. 10. 24 Who continueth unto the end shall be saved and others because they would not continue in the salvation of faith which before they had received and did chuse rather to make the grace of redemption in vain through their wicked doctrine and life then to keep it attain no way to the fullness of salvation and possession of eternal blessedness Seeing in both we have the doctrine of the godly Doctour Whosoever are baptized into Christ are baptized into his death and All which are baptized into Christ have put on Christ and Let us draw near with a true heart in fullness of faith having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience and being washed in the body with clean water let us hold fast the profession of our hope without change And again For them which sin willingly after the received knowledge of the truth there remains no other sacrifice for sin and He that despised the Law of Moses ..... Ca. 6. Item of grace by which the Beleevers are saved and without which never any reasonable creature hath lived blessedly and of free-will which is weakned by sin in the first man but by the grace of Jesus Christ is renewed and healed in his Beleevers We beleeve constantly and with full faith the same that the most holy Fathers have left to be kept according to the authority of the Holy Scriptures what the Arausican and African Synods have professed what the blessed High-Priests of the Apostolical See have held in the Catholick faith and presuming to decline no way into another side concerning nature and grace But we reject altogether the foolish questions and almost the fable of old women and Scot's pottage which the purity of faith cannot disgest and which have miserably and lamentably arisen in these most dangerous and grievous times unto a heap of our labours and breach of charity lest Christian minds be corrupted and fall from the simplicity and purity of faith which is in Jesus Christ So far they What they say here of Scot's pottage they understand that Treatise of Iohn Scot and have borrowed the phrase from Jerom's Prologue on Ierem. lib. 1. speaking of Celestius a Disciple of Pelagius a Briton and not a Scot. And from this word Baronius ad An. 855. § 1. writes that this Synod was convened against some vagring Scots of whom Gotteschalk was the prime man and thereby hath brought not only his Binius
said he may easily understand who will compare the new Divines with the ancient both Latine and Greek So far Berald Out of these two testimonies observe that Theophylact doth agree with the Ancients before him as Chrysostom Basilius and others of those ages whom he often quoteth and doth disagree from the multitude of Preachers in the Roman Church about the year 1533. Where then is their frequent gloriation of the constancy and unity of the Roman Church with the Ancient Fathers Hear then what Theophylact saith in the Articles of controversie in those daies In Prolog before Evang. Matth. he saith Because heresies were to bud forth which are ready to wast our manners it was thought necessary that the Gospels should be written to the end that we learning truth out of them should not be deceived with the lies of heresies and our manners should not altogether be undone On Cap. 13. near the end speaking of Christ and his mother he saith The mother would shew some human thing that she had power over her son for as yet she had no great thoughts of him and therefore while he was yet speaking she would draw him unto her Porsena here addeth on the margine Lege cautè To wit he saw that these words are against the Tenets of Rome that the Virgin was free from all sin and by right of her mother-hood she can command her son On Cap. 16. Because Peter had confessed that Jesus is the son of God he said that this confession which he had confessed shall be the foundation of Beleevers so that every man which shall build the house of faith shall lay this foundation for although we build many vertues and have not this foundation a right confession we do build unprofitably ..... They have power of binding and forgiving who receive the gift of Episcopacy or oversight as Peter did for although it was said unto Peter I will give unto thee nevertheless it was granted unto all the Apostles When when he said Whose sins ye forgive they are forgiven For when he said I will give he signifieth the time coming that is after the resurrection ...... When Peter speaks rightly Christ calleth him blessed but when he feareth without reason and will not have him to suffer he lasheth him and saith Go behind me Satan In Luc. cap. 2. Bishops should keep their Flock and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is sing in the field sing spiritual things and teach the people and hear divine visions and sayings Bethleem is the house of bread and what other is the house of bread but the Church in which bread is provided it is therefore the duty of spiritual Shepheards to seek heavenly bread which when they have seen they must preach it unto others ..... The things whereof the Scripture is silent we should not inquire On Cap. 16. Nothing is so profitable as diligent searching of the Scriptures the Divel may falsely and apparently make a search of the dead to deceive the unwise and from Hell he may sow doctrine according to his wickedness but those who do duly search the Scriptures nothing can delude them for the Scriptures are a lantern and light which when it shines the theef is found and made manifest therefore we should beleeve them and not regard the rising of the dead And a little before he saith As it is impossible for any man to pass from the company of the just into the place of sinners so it is impossible as Abraham teacheth us to pass from the place of punishment into the place of the just .... The bosom of Abraham is the possession of good things which are prepared for the just passing from the Waves of the Sea into the Haven of Heaven On Ioh. cap. 1. The new Testament is called grace because God gives freely unto us not only remission of sins but the adoption of children And it is called truth because whatsoever the Fathers saw in figure or spoke He hath here preached these clearly ........... Here we learn that the miracles of Christ's childhood are but feigned and lies and made up by them who would scorn the mystery for if these had been true how could the Lord have been unknown which wrought them for it is no way likely that he was not famous which did such miracles But it is not so for before he was baptized he wrought no signs neither was he known On Cap. 3. If thou knowest not the wind which is a Spirit subject to sense how searchest thou curiously of regeneration by the Spirit of God how and from whom it is breathed If this spirit cannot be comprehended far less is the grace of the Holy Ghost subject to the laws of nature Confounded therefore be Macedonius the fighter against the Holy Ghost and Eunomius before him for he would make the Spirit a servant although he hear in this place that the Spirit bloweth whither it will far rather hath the Holy Ghost a more free motion and doth work where he willeth and after what manner he willeth ...... When thou hearest that the Son of man came down from Heaven think not that his flesh came down from Heaven this did Apollinarius teach that Christ had a body from Heaven which did pass thorow the Virgin as thorow a Conduit But because Christ is one person consisting in two natures therefore whatsoever belongs to the Man-hood is spoken of the Word and again what belongs unto the Word is spoken of the Man So here the Son of Man is said to come down from Heaven because He is one person and again lest when ye hear it said The Son of Man came down you would think that he is not in Heaven He saith even he which is in Heaven for do not think that I am not there because I came down but both am I here bodily and I sit there as God with the Father ..... Here we learn that the old Testament is like or of the same nature with the new and there is but one giver of the old and new Testament although Marcion and Manicheus and that rabble of Hereticks deny it He teacheth also that since the Jews beholding the brazen Serpent did escape death far rather we looking on him which was crucified and beleeving shall escape the death of the soul ..... Adam died justly because he sinned but the Lord died unjustly because he had not sinned .... and because he died unjustly he overcame him by whom he was killed and so delivered Adam from death which was laid justly upon him On Cap. 6. Diligent faith is a guide unto good works and good works do conserve faith for both works are dead without faith and faith without works ....... He saith I am the bread of life he saith not I am the bread of nourishment but of life for when all things were dead Christ maketh us alive by himself who is that bread in so far as we beleeve that the leaven of mankind is heated by the fire
assured that this is the mind of Theophylact because for confirmation he adds The Lord said The bread that I will give you is my flesh and on these words in Ioh. 6. he saith Note well that the bread which is eaten by us in the Sacrament is not only some figuration of the Lord's flesh but the same flesh of the Lord for he said not The bread that I will give is a figure of my flesh but it is my flesh for by mysterious words it is transformed by mystical blessing and accession of the Holy Ghost into the Lord's flesh And at the words Vnless ye eat the flesh of the Son of man he addeth When we hear unless ye eat the flesh of the Son of man ye shall not have life we must in taking the Divine mysteries or Sacrament hold undoubted faith and not ask what way for the natural man that is who follows human and natural thoughts is not capable of spiritual things which are above nature and so he understandeth not the spiritual eating of the Lord's flesh of which they who are not partakers are not partakers of eternal life because they have not received Iesus who is eternal life for it is not the flesh of a meer man but of God and is able to Deifie us to wit being united unto the God-head That flesh is also verily food because it indureth not for a little time nor can be corrupted as corruptible food but it is a help unto eternal life In these his words we see that he speaks not absolutely as he did seem to speak on Matthew but as he spoke on Mark The bread is not only some figuration and then he saith It is transformed by mystical blessing and accession of the Holy Ghost And then he saith In taking the Divine mysteries we must hold undoubted faith then they who have not faith undoubted cannot eat that mysterious Sacrament And we must not ask what way to wit as they do now whether the substance of the bread be turned into the substance of Christ's body or whether the substance of the bread is turned to nothing and Christ's body comes into the form of the bread or c. Theophylact is far from asserting any of these waies And when he saith That flesh is verily food because it indureth not for a little time nor can be corrupted he speaks not of the visible bread which experience teacheth to be corruptible but he speaks of the Lord's flesh which we receive by faith In a word then Theophylact speaks nothing of transubstantiation but rather against it and the Papists delude themselves and abuse his words A fourth thing they object out of Theophylact that he asserts the Primacy of Peter when he saith on Joh. 21 He who durst not ask concerning the Traitour but did commit the question unto another now the government of all is concredited unto him And on the margine Porsena addeth Praefectura omnium Petro tributa and it follows as if Christ were saying unto Peter Now I bring thee forth that thou mayest govern the world and follow me and on the margine Praeest Petrus orbi But to expound these words as if Peter were the only governour of the World and the government of the World were wholly concredited unto Peter alone is far contrary unto the words and mind of Theophylact as we have heard from him on Gal. 2. where he asserteth that Paul was equal unto him and on Matth. 16 where he asserteth that all the Apostles were of equal authority Peter therefore was a governour of the world but not the only governour for all the Apostles were as much governours as he in respect of power since the power was given unto them all with one and the same words as Theophylact asserts and whatsoever power they had yet they had no civil power because as we have heard from Theophylact on Rom. 13. all souls even Apostles must be subject unto the Civil Magistrate Neither do the words of Porsena insinuate so much as they would have for Praefectura and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is but a subordinate power and a little jurisdiction yea and for the most part a conjunct power as Praefectus urbis which at Rome were two conjunct and subordinate unto the power of the former So this is all the power which they can bring unto Peter from the words of Theophylact and we may see how in many particulars he differeth from the Tenets of the Romish Church and favoureth them not in the main things wherein they pretend to have his consent 4. Radulph a Benedictine of Flaviak in this Century writ 20 books on Leviticus and 14 books on the Epistles of Paul as witnesseth Gesner In the Preface on Levit. he saith Although it should move us not a little to beleeve that the world was contrary unto the faith and now is subject unto the faith and that the faith was declared by so many miracles and testified by the blood of so many Martyrs yet the singular ground of faith is in the Scriptures when it is clearly seen to be fulfilled in our daies which we know was prefigured and foretold so many years by the Sacraments of the Fathers and Oracles of the Prophets Here by the way note that not only Radulph but many others of the more ancient Fathers do use the word Sacrament for the rites of religion yea and for mysteries and very largely or homonymously Lib. 1. cap. 1. Our Lord Jesus Christ is our Altar because we lay our oblation on him for if we do any good thing we hope that by him it shall be accepted of the Father and therefore the Apostle Peter saith Offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable unto God through Jesus Christ ..... The authority of the Holy Scripture doth furnish unto us matter of holy thoughts Ibid. Scarcely can any good work be perfected without admission of some sin it is therefore to be feared lest when the reward of perfect devotion is expected the punishment of our guiltiness be required of us Lib. 2. cap. 2. That Angel is none other but our greatest High-Priest of whom we speak to wit he was sent by the Father unto men and sent again from men unto the Father to plead the causes of men before the Father he being the Mediatour of God and men Ibid. cap. 4 Whatsoever man can do for himself were no way sufficient to obtain forgiveness unless the immaculate sacrifice of that Just one did commend the repentance of sinners Lib. 5. cap. 3 When ye do any good thing ascribe not the very affection of godliness unto you as if ye could do it of your self for it is God which worketh in us at his good pleasure both to will and to perfect ..... he who ascribeth grace unto himself must necessarily lose grace for which he was not thankfull Lib. 6. cap. 3. He dieth who discovereth his head because while he expects salvation another way then by the grace of Christ he doth
defended by the Canonical Scriptures and the sayings of blessed Augustine Observe here he whom the Pope calleth his Father and Master dependeth upon the Canonical Scriptures and upon Augustine and not upon the Pope nor thinketh upon that which now they call The casket of the Pope's breast I have also observed in his Epistles written unto the Popes Urban and Paschalis that he calleth them the Reverend high Priest of the Catholique Church and he saith your Highness your Majesty but he never saith your Holiness he calleth them the Vicar of St. Peter but never the Vicar of Christ nor in any place can I finde that he speaketh of any priviledge of Peter above the other Apostles and in the contrary in Comment on Mat. 16. he saith It is to be noted that this power was not given to Peter alone but as Peter answered one for all so in Peter he gave this power unto them all On Rom. 9. Seeing by the free-will of the first man all men fell into condemnation certainly it is not to be ascribed unto mans righteousness which is not before grace but unto the onely mercy of God that any of them are made vessels of honor but that any of them are vessels of wrath it should not be imputed unto the iniquity of God which is not but unto his justice He is Potter which of the same lump altogether corrupt in Adam maketh at his own pleasure some vessels unto honor in his mercy and others unto shame in his justice On 1 Cor. 1. The grace of God is given unto us through our Lord Jesus Christ and not through Peter or Paul grace is given by Jesus Christ because it is so appointed by God that whosoever believeth in Jesus Christ shall be saved not by works but by faith onely and freely receive the forgiveness of his sins On Rom. 10. Seeing hearing is of grace another grace is also necessary which may move the heart because the word of the Teacher outwardly availeth nothing if God do not inwardly touch the hearers heart On Chap. 14. He shall stand because God is able to make him stand for not he himself but God is able to make him stand for he who falleth falleth by his own will but by the will of God he standeth who standeth and riseth who riseth On 1 Cor. 4. Who hath discerned thee he saith this because of the mass of corruption which was by Adam none but God discerneth man that he is made a vessel unto honor But a man who is carnal and vainly puft up when he heareth Who hath discerned thee might answer by voice or thought and say My faith or my prayer or my righteousness hath discerned me The Apostle preveeneth such thoughts and saith What hast thou that thou hast not received God was the cause why thou wast and art thou the cause why thou art good Away for if God hath been the cause why thou wast and another hath been the cause why thou art good he is better which hath made thee good then he who made thee But none is better then God therefore thou hast received from God both that thou art and that thou art good On Hebr. 10. This true Priest did not offer often or many sacrifices but one offering which alone is sufficient for the sins of all believers after that he had fulfilled the obedience of his suffering sitteth his sacrifice was of such perfection and efficacy that it is needless to be offered again for the sins of any and albeit we offer it dayly that is but the remembrance of his suffering The Iesuit Raynaud denieth these Commentaries to be Anselm's albeit he cannot deny that in many Editions they go under his name nor can he bring any argument out of the Commentaries to prove what he saith and once he alledgeth that the Commentary on Matthew is Anselm's Bishop of Laudun and again he guesseth it to be Willielm Parisiens but this is an easie way to reject any Book But these testimonies agree with his other works which the Jesuit acknowledgeth and hath published That on Matth. 16. I finde not in them yet whereas he hath said in li. 1. ep 68. that he accordeth with the Canonical Books and with Augustine see then what Augustine saith on Ioh. Tract 124. As for Peter himself properly he was but one man by nature one Christian by grace one and the first Apostle by more abounding grace but when it was said I will give unto thee the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt binde on he did signifie the whole Church which is founded upon the rock from which Peter had his name for the rock was not named from Peter but Peter from the rock as Christ was not named from a Christian but a Christian from Christ therefore the Church which is founded on Christ received from him the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven that is the power of binding and loosing sins for what the Church is in Christ by propriety Peter is in the rock by signification And ibi Tract 7. In the name of Peter the Church was signified In many other places doth Augustine speak in that maner denying that power to have been given to Peter but as a member of the Church and at that time speaking in the name of all the Apostles or Church as that Commentary saith Concerning free-will and grace Anselm speaketh often and copiously I shall name but one in Tractat. de Concordia grat lib. arbi c. 13. Without doubt the will willeth not rightly unless it be right for as the sight is not quick or sharp because it seeth sharply but therefore it seeth sharply because it is sharp so the will is not right because it willeth rightly but it willeth rightly because it is right Now when it willeth righteousness certainly it willeth rightly Therefore it willeth not righteousness but because it is right I deny not that a right will willeth righteousness which it hath not when it willeth more then it hath but this I say it cannot will that righteousness if it have not righteousness by which it may will it Let us now consider whether any not having this righteousness can in any way have it of himself Certainly he cannot have it of himself but either by willing or not willing but by willing no man is able to attain it of himself because he cannot will it unless he have it and that any not having the righteousness of will can by himself attain it by not willing no mans minde can conceive therefore a creature can by no means have it of it self but neither can a creature have it from another creature for as a creature cannot save another creature so it cannot give that by which it may save it It followeth then that no creature hath that righteousness of will but by the grace of God But I have proved before that this righteousness may be kept by free-will therefore by the gift of God we have
us consider Whether it were fitting that God should forgive sin through mercy onely and without all payment of that honor which was taken from him To forgive sins thus is no other but not to punish and because to order sin rightly without satisfaction is no other but not to punish if it be not punished it is past without order but it is not fit that God should let sin pass without order therefore it is not fit that God should let sin pass without punishment and moreover if sin pass unpunished both the sinner and the not-sinner do fare alike with God which is not convenient unto God Yet more we all know that the righteousness of men is under a Law that according to its quantity the measure of retribution should be recompensed and if sin be neither paid nor punished it is under no Law and therefore if unrighteousness were let pass through mercy onely it were more free then righeousness is which were very inconvenient and this inconvenience were yet more that it would make unrighteousness equal unto God because as God is liable unto no Law so were unrighteousness And albeit he command us to forgive one another yet that is but because he so ordereth us that we take not in hand what belongeth unto him alone seeing to revenge is proper unto him who is Lord of all and when earthly powers do it rightly God doth it seeing they are ordained by him for the same effect As for his liberty and bountifulness we should think so reasonably of them that we destroy not his honor for liberty is but in things expedient and fitting nor can that be termed bountifulness which worketh any thing unfit for God And where it is said What God willeth is just and what God willeth not is not just that is not to be understood as if God would any inconvenient thing and it were just because God willeth it for it followeth if God will lye it were just to lye but rather that he were not God for a will cannot lye but such wherein truth is corrupt or rather which is corrupt by forsaking truth therefore when it is said If God will lye it is no other but if God be of that nature which can lye for this cause it followeth not that a lye is just unless it be understood as of two impossible things we say if this be that is because neither the one nor the other is as if one would say If the water be dry the fire is moist for neither of them is true And so it is true onely of these things which are not unbeseeming that God will them to say If God will this it is just Cap. 13. Nothing is less tolerable in the order of things then that the creature take away the honor which is due unto the Creator and pay not what he taketh away but nothing is suffered more unjustly then which is intolerable and therefore I think thou wilt not say that God should permit that which is unjust to be permitted as that the creature should not repay what he hath taken from God also seeing nothing is better then God nothing is more just then strictest justice which preserveth his honor in the dispensation of things and this justice is no other thing but God himself therefore God keepeth nothing more justly then the honor of his own excellency And think you that he keepeth it wholly if he suffer it to be taken from him so that it be neither paid nor he which hath taken it away be punished and if you dare not say so it followeth necessarily that the honor which is taken must be paid or punishment follow or else God were not just unto himself or that he is unable in both which to think were impiety Cap. 15. If you will say Why doth God permit his honor to be minced in the least certainly the honor of God cannot really be increased or minced for he is his honor incorruptibly and no way changeable nevertheless when each creature doth either reasonably or naturally keep its order which is commanded unto it it is said to obey God and to honor him and this is the reasonable creature especially to which is given to understand what it oweth which when it doth what it oweth it honoreth God not because it conferreth any thing on him but because it submitteth it self willingly unto his will and dispensation and so far as it may it continueth its order in the universality of things and the comliness of that universality but when it willeth not what it should it dishonoreth God so far as it can because it will not submit it self willingly unto his dispensation and it consoundeth the order and beauty of the universality so far as it may howbeit it cannot in the least do harm or defile the power and honor of God For if the things that are within the compass of heaven would not be under heaven or depart from heaven they cannot be but under heaven nor flee from heaven but by drawing nearer unto heaven for from whence and what way and whithersoever they go they are still under heaven and the more they go from any part of heaven they come the nearer unto the opposite part So albeit a man or bad angel will not be subject unto the will and dispensation of God they cannot flee from it because if they will flee from his commanding will they run under his punishing will And if you ask What way can they flee not but by his will permitting and what they will or do wickedly his infinite wisdom turneth it to the order and beauty of the forenamed universality for the same willing satisfaction of their perversity or requiring of punishment on them that satisfie not willingly besides that God doth many ways bring good out of evil have their place and continue the beauty of order in the same universality Cap. 19. This then is most sure if God could let sin go unpunished without satisfaction that is without willing payment of the debt a sinner could not attain unto blessedness at least that which he had before he sinned for in that way a man could not be restored such as he was before sin And whereas all nations do pray Forgive us our sins he who payeth not saith in vain Forgive and he who payeth prayeth because this belongeth unto payment that he doth supplicate for God is debtor to none and every creature is indebted unto him wherefore it is not fit that man deal with God as one with his fellow Cap. 20. Neither will you doubt I think that the satisfaction should be according to the measure of the fault Then what will you pay for your fault if you say repentance a contrite and humble heart abstinence and such toil of the body mercy in giving and forgiving and obedience In all these what give you unto God when you give any thing that you owe howbeit you had not sinned you may not reckon that for
they are letcherous in such a maner that they have not broken any bond of marriage Ibid. cap. 3. It is not possible that any of these whom God hath predestinated unto the Crown can lose their Crown it may be and it hath come to pass that some lose the Crown whom God hath called by a visible calling or which might have been heard by man Ibid. lib. 6. cap. 11. Excepting the Apostles whatsoever other thing afterwards is said let it be cut off neither have any authority therefore albeit after the Apostles there be any holy man how wise soever he be let him not have that authority seeing the Lord speaketh in the Scriptures Ibid. lib. 11. cap. 20. Possibly one will say Since Christ overcame death and ascended into the heavens doth he descend thence again surely he descendeth but invisibly all the world hath heard his descending when a sound was heard from heaven as of the Spirit coming and filled the house where they were sitting did not Christ then descend from heaven Is the substance or Majesty of the Son separated from the Spirit that when the holy Ghost descendeth the Son of God descendeth not also certainly he descendeth not in the form of his manhood yet undoubtedly he descendeth in his uncircumscribed Deity or in the Spirit that he giveth and he descendeth to visit the Nations by his Messengers whom he inspireth 9. Bernard in Epist 56. ad Gaufrid Episco Carnot writeth that Notbert Praemonstratensis did teach that Antichrist was before the doors and to be revealed in the same age Within these few days saith Bernard there I obtained to see this mans face and I learned many things from an heavenly fistule to wit from his mouth Behold what account this Author made of him who spake thus Hen. Oraeus in Nomenclat saith this Notbert was the beginner of the Order of Monks in the Diocy of Magdeburgh Pol. Vergil de inven rer lib. 7. cap. 3. calleth him a Priest of Lorrain and saith that he began that most exact Order after the rule of Augustinians as also in that Chapter and the preceeding he sheweth that sundry others seeing about that time that the Monastical institutions were not observed men becoming always worse and worse and godliness was corrupted by riches quae pietas ut mater illas à principio Ordini pepererat quotidie sunt qui ignaviae suae potius quà m religioni consulant therefore they would reform the Order and added some new Rites for distinction from others of the same Order who were become looser and by these means the number of Orders were multiplied 10. Theodoricus Abbot of St. Trudo at Leodium about the year 1120. said Simon Magus now reigneth at Rome and not Simon Peter and Simony is in place of the Gospel what may we not have if we have money In Catal. test verit lib. 14. are some of his verses concerning the Government of the Church he saith Vt Mopso Nisa corvo datur ecâ—e columba Qualis pullus erit quem fert commixtio talis Hence it appeareth that good men at that time bewailed the wretched condition of the Church 11. Hugo de S. Victore by Nation a Saxon and Abbot of S. Victor at Paris was in great account about the year 1130. His works are extant in three Tomes In one place he saith The Clerks of our time know not the Law nor learn they it but they study vanity ease surfeiting and drunkenness they are often in the streets seldom in the Churches slow to search the faults of sinners and ready to follow the trace of hares they give more bread to dogs then to the poor their beds are better arayed then the altars the barking of dogs and lowing of oxen is more pleasant unto God then the singing of such Clerks their preaching may be dispised whose life is contemned Of our communion with Christ he saith on Iohn 6. The Lord shewing a difference betwixt the bread he gave and which they did eat in the wilderness saith I am the bread of life for he is the bread wherewith an hungry soul is refreshed which is when true faith embraceth him for by faith we love him and by love we are united unto Christ which is our life therefore this spiritual bread is eaten by faith even without Sacramental eating and is profitable unto salvation dayly we have need of this bread while this present life endureth and so said Augustine Why preparest thou thy teeth and stomach believe and thou hast eaten On Chapter 20. he saith Whose sins ye forgive i. e. whose sins are forgiven by you God also forgiveth them this is spoken generally not onely unto the Apostles as some say this is the prerogative of the Apostles but it is spoken and granted unto all their successors On Rom. 3. The written Law is called the Law of works because men under the Law thought that all their righteousness was in the works of the Law but the Law of Faith and Grace is so called because men under Grace set the sum and efficacy of their salvation on Grace onely knowing that as no man is saved by righteousness of his works so none is justified by works of his righteousness for righteousness is not of good works but good works are of righteousness On Chapter 4. If man had not sinned he should have had perfect righteousness which consisteth in the perfect fulfilling of God's commands so that he should have had no lust against reason and he might have loved God with all his heart but after sin and for sin man cannot have this perfect righteousness unto which eternal life is justly due but God of his grace giveth faith unto man and of the same grace reputeth it for that perfection as if he had the perfection of righteousness De Scriptura Scriptor Sacris cap. 1. he saith That Scripture onely is truly called Divine which was from the Spirit of God and written by those who spoke by God's Spirit that maketh a man divine and reformeth him according to the image of God by teaching to know him and by exhorting to love him whatsoever is taught therein is truth whatsoever is commanded is good and whatsoever is promised is blessedness for God is truth without falshood goodness without wickedness and blessedness without misery In cap. 6 7. All Divine Scripture is contained in the Old and New Testaments and when he hath divided the Old Testament into the Law Prophets and Hagiographa and hath reckoned the Books that are in the Hebrew Canon he addeth There be also other Books as Wisdom the Books of Syracides Judith Tobias and the Maccabees that are read indeed but are not rolled in the Canon Catol test ver lib. 15. Likewise De Sacramentis fidei lib. 1. cap. 28. If it be asked What is original sin in us It is a corruption or vice by which in our birth we draw ignorance in our minde and concupiscence in the flesh And cap. 19. In the
it not of his own and so it is But what necessity required or what reason was there that seeing the mercy of God could by his onely word have delivered man yet the Son should assume flesh for our redemption and suffer so much even the ignominious death of the Cross We answer The necessity was on our part even the hard necessity of them who sat in darkness and in the shadow of death And the reason was the good pleasure of him who did it Who can deny that the Almighty had other ways to redeem justifie and deliver but this cannot priviledge the efficacy of this way which he hath chosen and possibly this is better by which we in this land of oblivion and of our fall are admonished the more powerfully and livelily of so many and so great grievances of our Redeemer and albeit we cannot fathom the mystery of God's counsel yet we may feel the effect of the work and perceive the fruit of the benefit It is a true saying and worthy of all acceptation that when we were yet sinners we were reconciled unto God by the death of his Son And he concludeth all his railings and invectives against God so that he saith All that God did appear in the flesh for was our instruction by word and example and all that he suffered and died for was the demonstration and commendation of his love toward us But what availeth his teaching us if he hath not restored us or are we not taught in vain if the body of sin be not first destroyed in us that we should not be the servants of sin If all that Christ hath been profitable unto us was the shewing a good example it followeth also that we must say All the harm that Adam hath done unto us was the onely shewing of sin seeing the plaster must be according to the quality of the wound for as in Adam all do die so in Christ shall all be made alive therefore as the one is so is the other Or if we will rest in the Christian faith and not in the Pelagian Heresie and confess that the sin of man was propogated by generation and not by example we must also confess that by Christ righteousness is restored not by example but by generation and life by righteousness that by one sin came upon all men to condemnation so by the obedience of one righteousness came on all men unto justification of life And if it were so that the purpose and cause of the incarnation as he saith was onely the enlightening of the world with the light of knowledge and the kindling of love by whom is our redemption and deliverance God forbid that I should glory in any thing but in the Cross of our Lord Jesus Christ in whom is our life salvation and resurrection And indeed I look upon three things chiefly in the work of our salvation the example of humility when God made himself of no reputation the measure of his love extending to the death even of the Cross and the mystery of redemption whereby he destroyed death which he suffered but the first two without this last are as if ye would paint in the air truly the example of humility is great and very useful and the example of love is worthy of all acceptation but they have no foundation and therefore no standing if there be not redemption I would with all my indeavor follow the example of Christ and I desire to imbrace with the mutual arms of love him who hath loved me and given himself for me but I must also eat the Paschal Lamb for unless I eat his flesh and drink his blood I shall not have life in me There be also many other Articles in his books and no less evil c. As every one may understand that upon these grounds follow the points of original sin of free-will of justification c. Pope Innocentius II. did condemn in a Councel of Cardinals at Rome this Abailard and all these his perverse Articles and commanded perpetual silence unto him as an Heretick and ordained all who followed his errors to be excommunicated as is in his Epistle which is among the Epistles of Bernard the CXCIV 28. When Calo. Johannes was Emperor of the Greeks was a Synod at Adispute between the Latins and Greeks Constantinople where Anselm Bishop of Havelbergens did dispute for the primacy of the Roman Pope and alledged these reasons 1. The Synod of Nice saith Let all men know and no Catholique should be ignorant that the Roman Church is not preferred by decrees of Synods but hath obtained the primacy by the Evangelical voice of our Lord and Savior when he said unto Peter the blessed Apostle Thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it and I will give thee the keys 2. Peter and Paul suffered martyrdom at Rome 3. The first See of the Church is Rome the second is Alexandria and the third is Antiochia which three are founded by Peter 4. Onely the Roman Church hath continued in all ages without heresies whereas all other Churches have been defiled with heresies 5. Christ said I have prayed for thee Peter that thy faith fail not and when thou art converted confirm thy brethren 6. The Church of Constantinople hath been obnoxious unto many heresies that have begun there or brought thither there was Arrius Macedonius Eutyches Eunomius Eudoxius therefore all Churches should acknowledge the Roman as their mother Nechites a Greek answereth The Roman Church was the first among the three Sisters but the Bishop of Rome was never called the first of Priests nor the first Bishop but the Bishop of the first See and he did first receive from Phocas to be called the head of all Churches Moreover these three Sisters were united together by some conditions that neither the Bishop of Rome nor of Alexandria nor of Antiochia might teach any things in their Churches which was different from the faith of the others and so they all should preach one and the same for this end it was ordained that two Legates well learned and sound in the faith or doctrine should be sent from the Church of Rome the one to abide at Alexandria and the other at Antiochia who should diligently observe whether they did continue preaching the analogy of faith and likewise two should be sent from Alexandria one to Rome and the other to Antiochia and two from Antiochia the one to Rome and the other to Alexandria and so they might aid one another if any need were and whatsoever was taught in any of these Churches should be confirmed by the Authority and testimony of the others but if any thing were contrary to the faith and disagreeing from the truth and communion of these Churches the Legates of the others should by brotherly charity and humble admonition correct that or if they could not correct it and one as temerarious and presumptuous
sin nothing hindered him from good and nothing moved him unto ill he had not infirmity unto ill and he had help unto good then his reason could judge without error and his will could follow good without difficulty but after sin and before reparation by grace he is burthened and overcome with lust and he hath infirmity in ill and hath not grace in good and therefore he may sin and he cannot but sin yea and damnably but after reparation and before confirmation he is burthened with lust but not overcome and he hath infirmity in ill but hath grace in good so that he may sin because of infirmity and liberty and he may not sin to death because of liberty and helping grace but he hath not that he can as yet not sin at all or that he cannot sin because the infirmity is not perfectly taken away and grace is not fully perfected but after confirmation when infirmity is altogether taken away and grace is perfected he cannot be overcome nor burthened and then shall he have that he cannot sin Ibid. A. That liberty which is from sin they onely now have whom the Son by grace maketh free and repaireth not so that they are altogether free from sin in this mortal flesh but that in them sin hath not dominion nor reigneth and this is true and good liberty which begetteth a good service to wit of righteousness Whence Augustin in Ench. faith None shall be free to do righteousness unless he being delivered from sin become the servant of righteousness and that is true liberty for their joy of the good deed and also it is godly service for obedience of the command Here it is to be noted that whereas it is said in the line propter recti facti laetitiam these Masters of Lovane have caused it to be printed in the margin recte faciendi licentiam This little change giveth occasion to consider whether the licence of doing a thing rightly or the joy and pleasure of doing well be more true liberty They shew that they do judge a licence of doing well is sufficient and nevertheless many have licence and commandment to do rightly and do it not nor have a will to do it and some do it and nevertheless are culpable because they do it not heartily or with pleasure but for some compulsion or by-respects as it followeth there in the line There is another liberty not true and conjoyned with evil service which is to do ill when reason dissenteth from the will judging that it should not be done what the will would do for to do good reason agreeth with the will and therefore that is true and pious liberty Whence it appeareth that the marginal alteration is far different from the meaning of the Master if it be not contrary Dist 27. A. Vertue is as Augustine saith a good quality of the minde whereby men live rightly and which none doth use evilly and which onely God worketh in man Therefore it is onely the work of God as Augustin teacheth of the vertue of righteousness upon that place of the Psalmist I have done judgement and righteousness saying Righteousness is an excellent vertue of the minde which none but God worketh in man Therefore when the Prophet in the person of the Church saith I have done righteousness he understandeth not the vertue it self which no man doth but the work of it Behold saith he here it is manifestly taught that righteousness in man is not the work of man but of God which is likewise to be meant of all other vertues B. For the Apostle writing unto the Ephesians of the grace of faith affirmeth likewise that faith is not of man but of God onely saying Through grace ye are saved by faith and that not of your selves for it is the gift of God Which is expounded by the Saints so This to wit faith is not from the power of our nature because it is meerly the gift of God Behold here it is clearly taught that faith is not from the liberty of will or of free-will which agreeth with what is said before that preveening and working grace is a vertue which maketh free and healeth the will of man Wherefore Augustin in lib. de Spir. lit saith We are justified not by free-will but by the grace of Christ not that it is without our will but our will is shewed to be weak by the Law that grace may heal the will and the will being made whole may obey the Law C Here it is clear that the motion of the minde whether unto good or ill is from free-will and therefore if grace or vertue be a motion of the minde it is of free-will but if it be of free-will even but partly then God alone without man worketh it not Therefore some have said not unlearnedly that vertue is a good quality or form of the minde which informeth the soul and it is not a motion or affection of the minde but free-will is helped by it that it may be moved and set on good and so out of vertue and free-will ariseth the good motion or affection of the minde and thence the good deed proceedeth outwardly as the earth is watered with rain that it may bud and bring forth fruit and the rain is not the earth nor the bud nor the fruit and the earth is not the bud nor fruit nor bud of the fruit So the rain of God's blessing is freely poured on the earth of our minde that is on free-will that is grace which onely God doth and not man with him is inspired whereby the will of man is watered that it may bud and bring forth fruit that is the will is healed and prepared that it may will good in which respect it is said to work and it is helped that it may do good in which respect it is said to cooperate And that grace is not without reason called vertue because it healeth and helpeth the will of man Because the Papists do wrest many passages of the Ancients wherein they finde the word meritum or meremur here we may see how these words are to be expounded and how Lombard did understand them in the Section E. Good will is both the gift of God and also the merit of man or rather of grace because it is principally of grace and it is a grace wherefore Augustin ad Sixt. Presbyt saith What is the merit of man before grace seeing nothing but grace worketh good merits in us for from grace as it is said which preveeneth and healeth the will of man and from that freedom ariseth in the soul of man the good affection or the good motion of the minde and this is the first good merit of man As for example from the vertue of faith and from the freedom of mans will is begotten in the minde some good motion and remunerable to wit to believe so from charity free-will another good motion proceedeth to wit to love which is a very good
fear laese-Majesty lest it seem that I deserve the gibbet as opening my mouth against the heaven nevertheless because Wido Cardinal of St. Potentiana beareth witness with the people I dare not altogether contradict them for he saith There is a root of duplicity in the Roman Church and I do ingenuously profess I never saw more honest Clergy-men then in the Church of Rome but seeing you press and command me and it is not lawful to lye unto the holy Ghost I profess ye are not altogether to be followed in your works for he who dissenteth from the truth is a Schismatick and Heretick but of the mercies of God there be some who will not follow all our works but I fear lest while you continue asking these things as you are pleased you hear from your foolish friend things that will not please you Why is it Father that you search other mens lives and search not your own all men rejoyce with you you are called the father and Lord of all men and all the oyl for sinners is poured on your head If you be a Father why cravest thou gifts from thy children or if thou be a Lord why causest thou not the Romans to stand in awe of thee and having brideled their presumption bringest them not again into the faith But thou wilt preserve the City unto the Church by thy gifts did Pope Sylvester so conquer it thou art a Father in the by-ways and not in the right ways it is to be conserved by such means as it was purchased c. The Pope told him the fable of the members grumbling against the womb and the same said he would befal unto Christendom if they should not resort unto Rome their head And then the Pope smiling at the mans boldness did require him that how oft he heard any thing spoken amiss of him he would presently advertise him Without doubt this Bishop had more things in his minde which he uttered not P. Morn in Myst ex Io. Sarisbu in Policrat lib. 6. cap. 24. In the same work lib. 6. cap. 16. he saith The Roman Legates do so rage as if Satan were come forth from the face of the Lord to oppress the Church oft do they harm and herein they are like the divel that they are called good when they do not evil with them judgement is nothing but a publick reward they do account gain to be godliness they do justifie the wicked for gifts and vex the afflicted souls they adorn their tables with silver and gold and rejoyce in the worst things seeing they eat the sins of the people they are clothed with them and in them do they riot many ways whereas true worshippers should adore the Father in the Spirit if any do dissent from them he is judged a Schismatick or Heretick O that Christ would manifest himself and openly shew the way wherein men should walk Lib. 7. cap. 10. We should be servants unto the Scriptures and not domineer over them unless one will think himself worthy to rule over Angels Cap. 17. One cometh into the Church trusting in the multitude of his riches and followeth Simon nor findeth he any that saith thy money perish with thee Another feareth to come unto Peter with his gifts yet privily Jupiter slideth in a shower of gold into Danae's bosome and the incestuous wooer entereth so into the bosome of the Church The Author of Catal. test ver lib. 14. sheweth ex Petro Paris Cantor in Abbreviat Verbo how this John did oppose the Pope and the Cardinals when they would enjoyn some new Rites and said ye should be so far from enjoyning new Rites that ye should rather take away some ancient ones albeit they were profitable for Christians are much burthened with the multitude of these useful traditions ye should rather endeavor that the word of Christ may be kept for now it may be objected unto us that the commandments of God are made of no effect in respect of mens traditions 8. Edmond Rich Arch-Bishop of Canterbury about the year 1181. was The cause of the ruine of the Church wont to say By gifts that are given on the one side and taken on the other Christianity is already corrupted and it will fail ere they be aware unless they be so wise as to cure themselves from this pest By these gifts some do understand not so much what was given by Intrants as what the Popes and Bishops gave to stop the mouths of such as spoke against their vices and errors to divert their reproofs Catal. test ver 9. Petrus Blesensis once Chancelor of Canterbury and then Bishop of Rotomagum for his learning and honesty of life was in great favor with Princes and Prelates saith Trithem He did very sharply rebuke the manners of the Clergy especially that they did abuse the power of the keys to satisfie their avarice In Epistle 25. unto a friend who was an official of a Bishop he saith Because I love thee affectionately in the bowels of Christ Jesus I have decreed to exhort thee with wholesome admonitions to come timely out of Ur of the Chaldees and from the midst of Babylon and forsake the ministry of that damnable stewardship I know covetousness hath subverted thy heart in so far as thou art become an official unto a Bishop I think officials have their name not from the nown officium but from the verb officio all the business of the official is in lieu of the Bishop to strip and excoriate the silly sheep which are concredited unto him these are the Bishops blood-suckers spuing out other folks blood after they have drunk it the riches which the wicked hath gathered he shall spue it out and God shall draw it out of his belly these are as a spunge in the hand of a strainer what he hath gathered by oppressing the poor goeth unto the Bishop's pleasures but to the official's torment as the bees gather honey not for themselves but for others so ye gather riches not for your selves but for others these are the privy doors by which the servants of Bell do thievishly carry away the sacrifices which the King had laid on the table so the Bishop taketh away other mens goods with long hands and layeth the blame of the crime and infamy on the official they have their eye on the reward but look not to the fatherless and widow what is done under pretence of counterfeit Religion and justice availeth not unto life nor edifieth unto salvation Saul did spare the fattest of Amaleks flocks as if he would sacrifice unto God and he did provoke God unto wrath I could the more patiently endure that damnable office if thou wert not eminent in the knowledge of the holy Scriptures these causes and judgements wherein thou hast entangled thy self imprudently I will not say impudently are fitter for a secular man a learned and ecclesiastical man should not meddle with secular affairs I wish that thou wouldest forsake these noisome
and tokens of bondage and have no Land in Scotland unless they shall dwell in it and if they will not dwell there the Scots should give them for their present possessions 30000 marks of Silver All this time the English were not of one accord for the King followed the counsel of Spencer Earl of Arundel the other Nobility caused the King to banish him but the next year he was restored to the great disturbance of the Kingdom at last they conspire to imprison the King and Hugh Spencer suffered death Tho. Cooper 2. When King Robert came to great age he ordained in Parliament his Successors to wit his Son David a child of eight years old which was espoused to Johanna Daughter of Edward the II. and if he should die without childe he ordained his Son in law Robert Stuart to succeed After he had exhorted the Estates to keep amity and unity he gave them three counsels 1. To beware that the Isles Aebudes be never given unto one man 2. That they never hazzard all their strength in one fight with the English 3. That they make not long truce with them After him Thomas Randolf Earl of Murray was chosen Regent of Scotland he was a good Justiciary and by no means would spare thieves and robbers So that when a Gentleman came from the Pope's Court and thought himself secure because he had obtained the Pope's pardon Thomas caused to apprehend him and said The pardon of sin belongeth unto the Pope but punishment of the body is in the King's hand Buchan lib. 9. 3. An. 1328. Charls the IV. King of France died without children then The title of England unto France Edward the III. King of England his Sisters Son claimeth the Crown of France as nearest Heir The French prefer Philip de Valois the Uncle's Son and they exclude Edward by a Law which they call Salica excluding women from succession At the first when the Estates of France had received Philip Edward did him homage for his Lands in France but when he was denied of a just demand wars began between these two Nations which ceased not altogether until the year 1495. as Tho. Cooper sheweth or rather until the days of Queen Elizabeth for sometimes the French prevailed and sometimes the English even so far as to be crowned at Paris and held Parliaments and had Deputies governing France Sometimes were truce of thirteen years or of ten years but never an absolute peace before Queen Elizabeth In the year 1393. the King of Armenia came into France and shewed how the Turks and Scythians were not only oppressing Hungary but were aiming at the conquest of all Christendom and in the mean time Christians were devouring one another with such words he perswaded both the Kings into a truce for four years Frossard Hist lib. 4. But I leave Civil affairs and return unto the Church 4. In the year 1306. an English Eremite preached at Pauls in London that some Sacraments that were then in use in the Church were not of Christ's institution therefore he was committed to prison Io. Bale ex Io. Baconthorp in Sent. lib. 4. dist 2. q. 1. 5. That John Baconthorp wrote on the Sentences where he followeth the truth in many things especially he refuteth sundry subtilties of Io. Scotus as Baptista Mantuanus hath marked Iste tenebrosi damnat vestigia Scoti Et per sacra novis it documenta viis Hunc habeant quibus est sapientia grata redundat Istius in sacris fontibus omne sophos He wrote de Domino Christi where he proveth that the highest Bishop in every Kingdom should be under Princes Bale Cent. 4. sect 82. 6. Richard Primate of Ireland alias Armachanus was his disciple and taught the same doctrine he translated the Bible into Irish In a Sermon at Paul's Cross in London An. 1356. he said In the estate of innocence none had been a beggar therefore according to that estate unless the law of necessity do press men none desireth nor should be a beggar as neither was Christ willingly a beggar the Law also forbiddeth it Deut. 15. There shall not be a beggar among you He discovered the hypocrisie of Friers in that though they professed poverty yet they had stately houses like the Palaces of Princes and more costly Churches then any Cathedral more richer ornaments then all the Princes more and better books then all the Doctors they had Cloisters and walking places so stately and large that men of Arms might fight on horse-back and encounter one another with their spears in them and their apparel richer then the greatest Prelates These Sermons are extant The next year he appeared before Innocentius the VI. and some of the four Orders of Friers appeared against him and he proved his propositions stoutly and manifestly against them that in many respects they had lest their first rules but saith Walsing in Edwar. III. the English Clergy sent not unto him according to their promises but the Friers wanted not plenty of money and so lite pendente before the cause was decided the Friers obtained a confirmation of their priviledges Armachanus died there at Avenion and was canonized 7. William Ockam was a disciple of Jo. Scotus but he became adversary of his doctrine he was the Author of the Sect of Nominales whereby new occasions of controversies arose to withdraw men from the study of faith He was a follower of Pope Nicolaus the V. and therefore was excommunicated by Pope John Then he thought it more safe to live under the Emperor's protection and he said unto the Emperor Lewis Defend me Caesar from the injury of the Pope by thy sword and I will defend thee by the word by writing and invincible reasons and so they did so long as they lived He wrote a Compendium Errorum of Pope John the XXII and a dialogue between a Clark and a Soldier wherein he handleth these questions 1. Whether Ockam's questions the Pope hath any primacy by right from God 2. Whether Peter had any primacy or was ever Bishop of Rome 3. Whether the Pope and Church of Rome may err Concerning the Emperor he discusseth 1. Whether one man may discharge the offices both of Priest and Emperor 2. Whether the Emperor hath his power from God only or from the Pope also 3. Whether the Pope and Church of Rome have any power from Christ to commit any jurisdiction unto Caesar and to other Princes 4. Whether Caesar after his election hath power to rule the Republick 5. Whether Kings anointed by a Bishop receive any power from him 6. Whether these Kings be any way subject unto their anointer 7. Whether the seven Electors give as great authority unto the elected Caesar as succession giveth unto other Princes c. All which he disputeth on both sides and concludeth always against the Extravagants He wrote also against Pope Clemens and calleth him an Heretick the Antichrist an hater of Christian poverty a foe of the Common-wealth an
be silent and then they all said Now he is dumb now by his silence he confesseth Iune 7. on which day the Sun was almost wholly eclipsed they assembled in the Cloister of the Minorites John Huss was also brought His Accusers read some Articles and undertook to prove them by Witnesses He protested that he had never spoken those things Then said the Cardinal of Florence Master you know that in the mouth of two or three Witnesses every judgement should be stable and here you shall see many famous Witnesses against you and for my part I cannot see how you can maintain your cause against them Huss answered I take God and my conscience to witness that I never taught such things as those men fear not to speak against me what they never heard of me The Cardinal said We cannot judge according to your conscience but must stay our selves upon evident Witnesses Then it was objected He defended the errors of Wickliff He answered He never defended any error of Wickliff When they instanced in some particulars he said These are not errors but agreeable to Scripture They objected He had sown sedition between the Ecclesiastical and Political States of Bohemia He answered Pope Gregory had taken the Empire from Wenceslaus and the Colledge of Cardinals being offended with the same Pope had written unto the King that if he would deny obedience unto the Pope they would bring it to pass that another Pope should be chosen who should restore him unto the Empire which he did and hence arose the division between the King and the Arch Bishop Sbinco a follower of Gregory and said he it is easie to be known that I am unjustly accused in that cause as the Germans here present can witness Albert Warren Arch Deacon of Prague stood up to speak but they would not hear him He was accused of some words in contempt of the Emperor and was cleared by testimony of the Lord de Chlum The Emperor then said to Huss Seeing we may not defend any man who is an Heretick or suspected of Heresie we advise thee to submit thy self unto the Councel in all things then we will provide that they shall suffer thee to go in peace with an easie pennance which if thou wilt refuse to do the Presidents will have sufficient cause to proceed against thee for our part be thou assured we will prepare the fire for thee with our own hands rather then suffer thee to maintain any opinions longer He answered O most Noble Emperor I render unto your Highness immortal thanks for your Letters of Safe-conduct and I take God to witness that I never intended to maintain any opinion obstinately and I came hither gladly that if the meanest of the Councel can lay before me any holier doctrine then mine I will change my minde Then he was led away by the Sergeants under the custody of the Bishop Rigen who had also Jerome of Prague in prison On the morrow they met again the former Articles were read in audience of Huss and others were said to be collected out of his Books of Predestination and Perseverance He answered acknowledging what they had truly gathered out of his Books and gave the reasons thereof he shewed that in some Articles they had perverted and wrested his words as may be seen in the cited History from sol 15. until 24. Then Peter de Aliaco Bishop of Cambrey said Thou heaâ—est how horrible crimes are laid against thee now it is thy part to think what to do thou must either recant all these Articles and so thou mayest finde favor or if thou wilt stand to the defense of them I fear it will be to thy danger this I speak to thee by way of counsel and not in manner of a Judge The like said other Cardinals He answered Most reverend Fathers I have said already that I came hither not to maintain any error obstinately but if in any particular I have conceived a perverse opinion I would gladly be reformed and now I beseech you that I may have liberty to declare my minde and if I bring not firm and sufficient reasons I will most humbly submit my self unto your information A Cardinal said Behold how craftily he speaketh he calleth it information and not correction or determination Verily said Huss term it as ye will I take God to witness that I speak from my heart After other speeches a Priest said He should not be admitted to recant for he hath written to his friends that although he swear with his tongue yet he will keep his minde without oath until death Then the Bishop Rigen commanded to carry him to prison He writ all those things being in prison unto his friends that the truth might be known and calumnies be prevented as he declareth in his Epistles When he was removed the Emperor said unto the Presidents that either he should recant all those things that were laid against him and abjure all preaching and be exiled out of Bohemia or else be punished with fire and all his favorets in Constance be apprehended and punished namely his Disciple Jerome Others said When the Master is daunted his Disciples will be more tractable Iuly 6. the Emperor sent unto him four Bishops with the two Bohemian Barons to know what he would do When he was brought out of prison John de Chlum said first Mr. John I am an unlearned man neither able to instruct you a man of learning nevertheless I require you if you know your self to be guilty of any of those errors that you would not be ashamed to change your minde but I will not advise you to do any thing against your conscience but rather to suffer any punishment then to deny what you know to be truth John said with tears Verily as I have often said I take the most high God to be witness that I am ready with all my heart if the Councel will instruct me by the holy Scriptures to change my minde Then said a Bishop I would never be so arrogant as to prefer my judgement unto the judgement of the whole Councel John answered Neither do I otherwise but if the meanest of the Councel will convince me of error I will perform with all my heart whatsoever the Councel will injoyn me Mark said another Bishop how he continueth in his errors So they commanded to put him into prison again The next day a general Congregation was in the great Church and the Emperor was present here was laid down all the vestiments belonging to a Priest John was brought and falling down on his knees he prayed a good space The Bishop Londensis went up into the Pulpit his Text was Rom. 6. Let the body of sin be destroyed all his Sermon aimed that John Huss should be destroyed Then a Bishop read the process against Huss at Rome and the Articles of his accusation When he attempted to answer a word or two unto the Articles severally the Cardinal of Cambrey commanded
and there entred into the monastery of the Augustinians After three years he was inuited to be professour of Philosophy in Witembergh and there he was graduat Doctour of Divinity by Andr. Catolstadius An. 1512. In Erford he had learned of an old Augustinian that it is not sufficient to believe generally the remission of sin or that it belongs unto them only whose names are registred in Scriptures but every true penitent may believe that his own sins are forgiven him freely in Christ and accordingly is that to be understood Wee are justified by faith freely Afterwards he read the works of Augustin and despised not the Sententiaries namely Thomas Biel Occam c. In the year 1516. he had a publick disputation of Free-will against the common doctrine of the School-men as Lu. Osiand in Epit. hist cent 16. li. 1. c. 19. rehearseth His Question was Whether man being created after the image of God can by his naturall power keep the commands of God the creator or do or think any good and by grace deserve and know his merites Hee answereth in three Conclusions and so many Corollaries unto each of them Conclu I Man in respect of his soul made to the image of God and so fitted for the grace of God doth by his naturall strength only make every creature which he useth subject to vanity and seeketh himself and things according to the flesh Corollar 1. The old man is vanity of vanities altogether vanity and makes all creatures even which are good to be vain Coroll II. The old man is called flesh not only because he is led with sensuall concupiscence but albeit he be chast wise just because he is not renewed of God by the Spirit Corol. 3. Albeit all unbelievers be vain and do no good yet they shall not all suffer alike punnishment Conclus 2. A man without Gods grace can no way keep his commandements nor prepare himself unto grace vel de congruo vel de condigno but necessarily abides under sin Goroll 1. The will of man without grace is not free but serveth albeit not unwillingly Cor. 2. When a man doeth what is in himself he sinneth seeing of himself he can neither will nor think well Cor 3. Seing the righteousnes of believers is hid in God and their sin is manifest in themselves it is true that only the un just are damned and sinners whoores are saved Conclus III. Grace or charity which helpeth not but in extream necessity is very dull or rather no charity unless by extream necessity be understood not the perrill of death but every one's want Coroll 1. Christ Jesus our strength our righteousnes the searcher of the hearts and reines is the only searcher and judge of our merites Cor. 2. Seing unto a believer all things by the power of Christ are possible it is superstitious to depute other helps unto mans will or of other Saints Cor. 3. According to the premisses is the answer unto the Question He wrote unto an Eremite thus I desire to know what thy soul doeth whether now in the end it be weary of it's righteousness and learneth to be refreshed with and trust in the righteousness of Christ for in our time the tentation of presumption is strong in many and chiefly in those who study to be just and good by their own strength and being ignorant of the righteousness of God which is in Christ abundantly and is given freely seek by themselves to do well so long untill they have confidence to stand before God as it were adorned by their own strength and merites which is impossible Thou wast some time in this opinion or errour and so was I but now I fight against this errour but as yet have not overcome therefore dear brother learne Christ and him crucified learne to sing unto Him and despairing of thyself to say unto him Thou Lord Jesus art my righteousness but I am thy sin thou hast taken mine and hast given mee thine thou hast taken what thou wast not and hast given mee what I was not Take heed lest at any time thou aspire unto so great purity that thou wouldst not seem to thy self a sinner yea or not to be a sinner for Christ dwelleth not but in sinners for therefore came he down from heaven where he dwelt among the righteous that he might dwell in sinners Think upon that his love and thou shalt see his most sweet consolation For if we must come by our labours and afflictions to the peace of conscience why hath he died therefore thou canst not finde peace but by him and by fiduciall despairing of thyself and thy works and further thou shalt learne thereby that as he hath taken thee and made thy sins his so hath he made his righteousness thine Howbeit Luther had so disputed and written yet none did oppose him but rather he purchased love and estimation 3. When the Indulgences were proclaimed and preached in the manner Luthers first assault named before his zeal could not endure the vanity of them and the blasphemies wherewith they were commended At the first he spoke not against the use of indulgences but against the abuses of them and against the blasphemous commending of them and as he shewes in his Apology which is in Sleidan lib. 13 he wrote unto the Bishop of Mentz exhorting him humbly to inhibite or restrain these Friers but the Bishop returned him no answer yet the Bishop of Brandenburgh hearing of that epistle did admonish Luther to take heed lest he brought himself into danger Likewise Alb. Crantzius the historian said unto him Brother you speak truth but you can not help it go into your cell and pray Lord have mercy upon us And the Prior and subprior of Wittembergh did entreat him that for respect unto their Order he would be silent and not bring it into contempt and the rather that the Franciscanes were beginning to rejoice that the Augustinians were falling into contempt even as they Luther answereth All this will fall if it be not begun in the name of the Lord but if it bee let us trust to God that he will carry it on Schultet Annal. ad An. 1517. John Bishop of Misna at that time said he had lately read the holy Scriptures and therein had found a religion very unlike unto that that was presently professed And a litle before his death he heard of Tecelius and said This will be the last seller of such wares for intollerable is his impudence Ibid. A rich woman of Magdeburgh after confession could not have a pardon from a Dominican unless she would give a hundred florenes she adviseth with a Franciscan her former Confessour and he said unto her God forgives sin freely and selleth not as a merchant And he besought her that she would not tell Tecelins who had informed her so But when Tecelius knew that for this cause she would not give the mony he said that he shall be either burnt or banished
tolerated that good may spring out of them as neither did the followers of Luther pretend these scandals grievances flowing from the Romane Court and though they had done it they should not forsake Catholick unity but rather in the highest patience have suffered the most grievous extremities and therefore they should even now put that Edict into execution as the Apostolicall See is ready to relieve Germany of their uniust oppressions by the Romane Court if there be any As for the Annates seing the Pope will give an answer in due time he hath nothing to say But concerning their petition of a Councell he thinks it will be accepted by the Pope if they will smooth their words which seem to be harsh to wit that they require the consent of the Emperour and that it be called into one place rather than in another if these words be not smoothed they seem to curb the Popes power and so can bring no good effect c. This reply in these and other particulars was not acceptable for they did measure good and evill by the rule of gain unto the Roman Court and in the mean time they would amend in nothing but only in words of vain promises Therefore after deliberation they resolue that they will not depart from their former answer but will rather expect what the Pope will do Then the Seculare Princes begin to consider the manifold Grievances of the Nation flowing not from the Court only but from the whole body of the clergy When the Legate heares of this purpose he will stay no longer Nevertheless they go on and gather them which afterwards were called The bundred grievances of Germany and sent them unto the Court of Rome with a protestation that they could endure them no longer Some of the Grievances were the vast sums of money for dispensations absolutions and indulgences advocations of pleas from Germany to Rome Reservation of Benefices corruptions of Commenda's Annates exemption of guilty Church-men from Civill Courts uniust excommunications and interdictions the bringing of severall pleas unto Church-consistories covered with many pretexts c. and they reduce all unto three chief heads the oppression of the people with most grievous bondage Germany is spoiled of wealth and they usurpe the power of the Magistrate The Diet was dissolved March 6. An. 1523. and all these the Popes Brieve and his instructions the answer of the Princes the Legat's reply and the Grievances were printed and spread When they were brought to Rome it did gall the Court that by the Popes confession they were called the fountain of all these evills and the Prelates could not endure that they were brought into contempt and that the people now had not only cause to revile them but the Lutherans had matter of joy exultation and they were brought into inevitable necessity to loose their power and gain else it were cleare that they were incorrigible Who did favour the Pope made excuse that he was ignorant of the policies whereby Papall power and the authority of the Court had stood so long Pope Leo was more wise when the Germanes had blamed the Court he said It was their ignorance and mistaking so that if Luther had been sent to Rome when it was required he had not seen abuses there But in Germany they said The Popes confession was but a trick of that Court to confesse a fault and promise amendement and never to think of amending and so deceive people for their own interest And where the Pope sayd All things can not be Reformed at once they said merrily he will proceed so slowly that an age may slip betwixt the first and next step And nevertheless saith Pe. Soave Hadrian professed freely and ingenuously that the Church was corrupted and he was solicitous of remedies as appeares by the issue he died September 13. In that Edict or Answer of Nurembergh were also other particulares which the Germans did expound diversly according to their affections as where it was said Preachers shall not speak of such things that may raise broils among the people The Papists said the meaning is These things should not be repeated that Luther had taught and especially the pretended errours of Church-men On the other side who where desirous of Reformation said The meaning of the Diet is Priests should not mantain these abuses which heretofore had provoked the people against Church-men Again where it was said They shall preach the Gospell according to the doctrine of Doctours approved by the Church the Papists said The meaning is they should preach nothing but according to the late Schoolmen and the Postillators But others said By such Writers were understood the Fathers of the Primitive Church as Hilarius Ambrose Augustin Hierome and such And so that Edict which was supposed to quench the fire of controversies did inflamme them more and all good men saw a necessity of calling a Councell and that parties should submit thereunto Pe. Soave in histo Concil The adversaries of truth devise another The wranglings of monks trick against the Reformation to wit they traduce the opposite doctrin with maligne interpretations as when Luther said Christ hath satisfied for our sins and our works are not satisfactory unto Divine justice the Monks say The new preachers are enemies of good works as if faith alone were necessary unto salvation and as if it were alike whether we live holily or not When Luther said None is tied necessarily to confesse all his sins unto a priest the Monks said They make no confession unto God nor man In a word as Erasmus writes in Epist in Pseude-Evangel dated Friburg An. 1529. the Monks and Divines through cruelty of nature or foolishnes or for gain or hope or honour or privat malice did most cruelly accuse them not only of frivolous things and which might be disputed on both sides but most perversly they did miss-interprete what was well spoken And this was another spurre to provoke their followers to execute the Edict of Worms the same year Therefore said Erasmus Io. cit Before this time was some licence to dispute of the Popes power of indulgences and of purgatory but now we dar not speak of things that are godly and true we are compelled to believe that man of himself worketh meritorious works and by his works deserves eternall life ex condigno that the Blessed Virgine may command her son to hear the prayers of this or that man and many other things horrible unto godly eares John Prince of Anhalt began to affect the truth and did advertise Luther by Do. Hierom and a Franciscan that he should purge him of that calumny which Ferdinand Duke of Austria had imputed unto him in Norinbergh that he had said Christ was not the seed of Abraham Charles Duke of Savoy was very desirous of truth and purity Luther understanding it by Annemund Coct a French Knight writes unto him a Confession of faith to confirme him in the
Bessarion being a wretched Clerk in Trapezus became a gloriou Cardinal and almost Pope Luthet answered He seeth not what more affinity is between Christ and the Pope than there is between light and darknes nothing in all his life had hapned unto him more happily than the severity of Leo by the gracious providence of God for at that time he had only seen the abuses of indulgences and the Pope might have easily commanded him if his adversaries in that matter had been subject unto the lawes of equity but being provoked by the writings of the Master of the holy palace by the reproaches of Cajetan and severity of Pope Leo he took the whole matter into more diligent consideration and had espied more intolerable errours which he could not in conscience dissemble nor hide from others-and whereas he the Legate professeth himself not to be a Divine and that appeares by his reasons that he accuseth his doctrine of novelty yet he can not be ignorant that Christ and his Apostles and the antient fathers lived not as the Pope and his cardd and bb do now Nor can these arguments taken from the broiles in Germany strick against his doctrine but in the conceit of men which know not the Scriptures seing where ever the word of God is preached truly such stirres arise that the father is against the son but this is the power of the worde that who believes it he shall live and who spurneth against it is the more guilty And this is a most known errour of the Romane Church that they will underprop with humane reasons the Church of Christ as if it were a seculare Estate but such reasons are foolishness with God and that the councel may go well and bring good unto the Church it is not in the power of him who is but a mean man but rather of the Pope if he will let it be free that Gods Spirit may only preside and rule and laying aside all interests and usurpations and crafts of men let controversies be judged according to the Canon of the sacred Scripture If it were so he for his part will promise all Christian sincerity and charity and not to gain the favour of the Pope or of any mortal but only for the glory of Christ and for establishing the peace and liberty of the Church Nor can so great good be expected unless God be reconciled by casting away hypocrisy and by earnest repentance for our sinns .... Nor doth he regard the examples of Sylvius Bessarion these darke shewes can not move him .... yea the Legate and the Pope shall embrace his faith rather than he will forsake it Histo Concil Tride lib. 1. The same Vergerius dealt with other Preachers in Wittembergh and other places where he came he found no acceptance among them and where any did speake submissely he made no great account of them they were but few and he thought they could do little The same year Charles Duke of Savoy was persuaded by the exiled Bishop of Geneve to take arms against that City they had aid from the Swisers especially from Berne and gave the repulse the Swisers conquered all the land between them and the lake of Geneve Jo. Sleida Ibid. XXXI In the year 1536. the Preachers of the Cities which had The agreement in the question of the Ls Supper Ann. 1536. presented their Confession differing from the Augustane in the question of the Sacrament considering that the Pope might make his advantage upon that difference if the Councell shall hold at Mantua thought good to seek agreement with Luther and others So Capito Bucer went from Stawsburgh and others from Essling Memming Frankford Ausburgh Furfeld and Reutling and made accord with the Divines of Wittembergh On these articles following 1. We believe according to the words of Irenaeus that the Eucharist consists of two parts an earthly and an heavenly and we think and teach that the body blood of Christ is truly and substantially present with and given taken with the bread wine 2 albeit we deny transsubstantiation nor think that there is any locall inclusion in the bread or any durable conjunction with out the use of the sacrament yet we grant that the bread is the body of Christ by a sacramental union that is we think when the bread is given the body of Christ is also present and is truly given for without the use extra usum when it is keept in a boxe or is shewed in processions as a mong the Papists we thinke Christs body is not present 3. We think that the Institution of Christ is powerfull in the Church and that it dependeth not upon the dignity of the Minister or receiver Wherefore as Paul saith even the unworthy do eat the Sacrament so we think that the body and blood of Christ is truly reached unto the unworthy and the unworthy receive it where the words institution of Christ are keept but such do receive to their judgement as Paul saith because they abuse the sacrament when they use it without repentance and faith for it is institute for this end that he may testify that grace and the benefites of Christ are applied unto them and that they are ingrasted into Christ and washed in his blood who do repent and lift up themselves by faith in Christ If followes Because few of us are conveened at this time and this business belongeth unto other preachers and Magistrats of both parties we can not yet conclude the matter of concord before it be reported unto others also but seeing all the Divines here present do professe that in all the Articles of the Confession and of the Apology we would think and teach wholly the same we wish and earnestly crave that the Concord may be made and begun and if other Divines of both parties shall approve this article concerning the Lords supper we hope that a firme Concord may be made among us The above named Divines eleven in number did subscribe so did Luther Cas Cruciger Melanthon Jo. Bogenhagius Justus Menius and Frid. Myconius Hence it is cleare that then was no other difference in the articles of Confession and who hath made the difference after that time Osiander calleth this Formula Concordiae Wittebergensis others calleth it Concordia Smalcaldica But in the year 1537. was a solemn meeting of the Protestants at Smalcald by the advice of the Princes and Divines Luther wrote The meeting at Smalcald 1537. the Heads of Doctrin to be propounded and defended in the Councel which were approved and subscribed by the Ministers The article concerning the sacrament of the altare as they called it was thus Of the sacrament of the altare we judge that the bread and wine in the Supper are the very body and blood of Christ and not only given unto and received by the godly but also by the evill and wicked Christians and that not one kinde only should be given for we have not need of
exception at all but lacke of money Yee have a secret counsell by yourselves All other mens counselâ— secrets know ye and no man yours ye seek but honours riches promotion authority and reigne over all and will obey no man ... when a parish hyreth a schole master to teach our children what reason is it that wee should be compelled to pay this schoolmaster his wages if he take licence to go where he will and to dwell in another countrey and leave our children untaught Doeth not the Pope so have we not given up our tyths of courtesy unto one to teach us Gods word and comes not the Pope and compelleth us to pay it violently to them that never teach makes he not a Parson which comes never at us yea one shall have 5. or 6. or as many as he can get and woteth oftymes where never one of them stands Another is made Vicar to whom he gives a dispensation to go where he will and to set in a parish-priest which can but minister a sort of dumb ceremonies and because he hath most labour and least profite he polleth on his part and fetcheth here a masse-penny there a trentall yonder dirige-money and for his bead-role with a confession peny and such lyke Fol. 31. he saith Why did not David slay Saul seing he was None may judge a King so wicked not in persecuting David only but in disobeying Gods commandements and in that he had slayn 85. of Gods priests wrongfully verily because it was not lawfull for if he had done it he must have sinned against God for God hath made the King in every realm judge over all and over him is no judge he that judgeth the King judgeth God and he that layth hands on the King layth hands on God and he that resistes the King resists God and damneth Gods law ordinance If the subjects sin they must be brought to the Kings judgement If the King sinne he must be reserved unto the judgement wrath and vengeance of God And as it is to resist the King so it is to resist his officer which is sent or set to execute the Kings commandement ..... they asked Christ Mat. 22 whether it were lawfull to give tribute unto Coesar for they thought it was not sin to resist an heathen Prince as few of us would think if we were under the Turk that it were sin to rise against him and to rid ourselves from under his dominion so sore have our bishops robbed us of the true doctrine of Christ But Christ condemned their deeds and also the secret thoughts of all other that consented thereunto saying Except ye repent ye shall lykewise perish as if he had said I know that ye are within your hearts such as they were in their deeds and ye are under the same damnation except therefore ye repent betimes ye shall break out at the last into the like deeds and likewise perish as it came afterward to passe .... Another conclusion is No person nor any degree may be exempt from this ordinance of God Neither can the profession of monks or friers or any thing that the Pope or bb can say for themselves except them from the sword of the Emperour ot kings if they break the law for it is written Let every soul submitt himself unto the authority of the higher powers The higher powers are the temporal kings Princes unto whom God hath given the sword to punish whosoever sinneth God hath not given the sword to punish one and to let another go free and to sin unpunished Moreover with what face durst the spiritualty which ought to have been the light example of good living unto all others desire to sin unpunished Fol. 41 They have robbed all realmes The bb have universall intelligence not of Gods word only but of all wealth and prosperity and have driven peace out of all landes and withdrawen themselves from all obedience to princes and have sâ—parated themselves from lay men counting them viler than dogs and have set up that great idole the whore of Babylon Antichrist of Rome whom they call Pope and have conspired against all commonwealths and have made them a severall kingdom wherein it is lawfull and unpunished to work all abomination in every parish they have spies and in every great mans house and in every tavern and ailhouse and by confessions they know all secrets so that no man may open his mouth to rebuke whatsoever they do but he shall be shortly made an heretick In all Counsels is one of them yea the most part and chief rulers of the Counsels are of them but of their Counsell is no man Fol. 55 Let Kings Bb. should not be Stats men rule their realmes themselves with the help of lay men that are sage wise learned expert Is it not a shame above all shames and a monstrous thing that no man should be found to governe a worldly kingdom but Bishops and prelates that have forsaken the world and are taken out of the world and appointed to preach the kingdom of God ...... To preach Gods word is too much for half a man and to minister a temporall kingdom is too much for half a man also each of them requires a whole man therefore one can not well do both He that avengeth himself on every trifle is not meet to preach the patience of Christ that a man should forgive and suffer wrongs He that is overwhelmed with all manner of riches and doth but seek more daily is not meet to preach poverty He that will obey no man it not meet to preach how wee should obey all men ..... Paul saith God sent mee but to preach A terrible saying verily for Popes Cardinals Bishops If he had said Wâ— unto mee if I fight not and move not Princes unto warre or If I increase not S. Peters patrimony as they call it it had been a more easie saying for them Christ forbidds his disciples to climbe above Lords Kings and Emperours in worldly government but also to exalt themselves one a bove another in the kingdom of God But in vain for the Pope would not hear it though he had commanded it ten thousand times Gods word should rule only and not Bishops decrees or the Popes pleasure He hath many such passages against the governement of the Pope and prelates And also of the doctrine of faith he speakes well as Fol. 43. he saith Thou wilt say If love fulfill the law then it justifieth I say That wherewith a man fulfilleth the law â—declares him justified but that which gives him wherewith to fulfill the law justifieth him By justifying understand the forgiveness of sin and the favour of God Now saith the text Rom. 10. the end of the law or the cause wherefore the law was made is Christ to justifie all that believe that is the law is given to utter sin to kill the consciences to damn our deeds to bring unto repentance
and so to drive unto Christ in whom God hath promised his favour and forgiveness of sin unto all that repent and consent to the law that it is good If thou believe the promises then doth Gods truth justify thee that is forgives thee and receives thee to favour for Christs sake In assurance where of and to certify thy heart he sealeth thee with the Spirit Eph. 1. Fol. 54. Peter in Act. 2. practiseth his keyes and by preaching the law brought the people to the knowledge of themselves and bindeth their consciences so that they were pricked in their hearts and said What shall wee do Then brought he forth the keye of the sweet promises saying Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sinnes ...... As Christ compares the understanding of the Scripture unto keyes so compares he it to a nett and unto leaven and many other things for certain properties I marvell therefore that they boast not of their nett leaven aswell as of their keyes But as Christ biddeth us bewar of the leven of the Pharisees so beware of their counterfited keyes Fol. 56. The Bishop of Rochester would prove by Moses Aaron that Satan and Antichrist our most holy father the Pope is Christs Vicar and head of Christs Church Moses saith he signifieth Christ and Aaron the Pope And yet the epistle unto the Hebr. proves that the high priest of the old law signifieth Christ and his offering and his going once in the year into the inner temple signify the offring wherewith Christ offered himself and Christs going-in to the Father to be an everlasting Mediatour or intercessour for us ...... If the Pope be signified by Aaron and Christ by Moses why is not the Pope as well content with Christs law doctrin as Aaron was with Moses why do our bb preach the Pope and noâ— Christ seing the Apostles preached not Peter but Christ Paul speaking of himself and of his fellow apostles saith Wee preach not ourselves but Christ Jesus the Lord and Wee preach ourselves your servants for Christs sake c. For such doctrin Tindall was persecuted and when he escaped out of their hands into Germany they burnt the New Testament that he had translated into English and they caused the Masters of Lovan to burne his body An. 1535. II. It is not necessary to speak more of the grosse ignorance and wickedness Pa. Hamilton a Scotish Martyre of the clergy people at that time unless iâ— fall in by the by but behold how God brought the light of the Gospell into this Island I may say wonderfully First Patrik Hamilton a young gentleman was made Abbot of Ferne and then he would go and see other countries and in his trauels he visites Witemberg and there he heard Luther Melanthon others he had litle or no understanding before and hearkned unto them and took it to heart He returnes â—ome in the 23. year of his age in the end of the year 1526. In what companie he came he spared not to speak against the corruptions of the Church and to declare the truth as he had learned it The clergy could not endure this and under colour of conference they entice him unto Santan drews They had persuaded the young King James 5. to go in pilgrimage to S. Duthess in Rosse lest he sould hinder their proceeding In the night time Patrik Hamilton was taken out of the chamber where he was lodged and carried into the castle the next day he was presented before the arch Bishop James beâ—on and accused upon these articles The corruption of nature remains in children after baptisme 2. No the articles layd to his charge man by the power of free will can do any good 3. No man is without sin so long as he liveth 4. Every true Christian may know himself to be in the estate of grace 5. A man is not justified by works but by faith only 6. Good works make not a good man but a good man doth good works and an ill man doth ill works yet the same ill if truly repented make not an ill man 7. Faith hope charity are so linked together that he who hath one of them hath all and who lacketh one of them lacketh all 8. God is the cause of sin in this sense that he withdrawes his grace from man and grace being withdrawn he can not but sin 9. It is a devilish doctrine to teach that by any actuall pennâ—nce remission of sin is purchased 10 Auricular confession it not necessary to salvation 11. There is no purgatory 12. The holy Patriarchs were in heaven before Christâ— passion 13. The Pope is Antichrist and every priest hath as much power as the Pope He is demanded What he thinks of these articles He answereth â— hold the first seven to be undoubtedly true and the other are disputable points nor can I condemne them unless I see better reason than as yet I have heard After some conference with him these articles were delivered unto the Rectour of the University who with other twelve as they were called Divines Lawyers having censured and condemned them as hereticall redelivereth them within two dayes in a solemne meeting March 2. year 1527. of the two archbb three bb sixe Abbots and Priours and eight Divines These all set their hands unto the sentence and the â—ame day Pa. Hamilton was condemned by the Secular Judge and burnt in the afternoon When this execution was reported many in all parts of the kingdom do enquire why was such a man burnt and when they heard of the articles they talk of the truth of them and many do apprehend otherwise then was judged The blood of a Martyr 〈…〉 seed of the Church In the University these articles took a deep impression yea and many Friers begâ—n in their Sermons to comdemn the errours and abuses of the Clergy Thus God made the martyrdom of one man to be the meanes of spreading the trueth unto many In time of that Lent Alex. Seton a Dominican preached oft in Santandrewes the substance of his Sermons was The law of God is the only rule of righteousnes If Gods law be not violated no sin is committed It is not in mans power to satisfie for sin The forgiveness of sin is no way purchased but by unfained repentance and true faith apprehending the mercy of God in Christ He spoke not of purgatory pilgrimage prayer to Saints merits nor miracles as the Friers were wont therefore he was suspected of heresy Before the Lent was finished he went to Dundy and there he was advertised that another Dominican had publickly contradicted his former doctrine without delay he returnes and in a Sermon confirmes what he had taught before and moreover he speaks of the vertues that are required of a faithfull Bishop and made this Use of them Within Scotland are no true Bishops if they be examined by those notes which
baptisme pennance and sacrament of the altar little or nothing differing from the Church of Rome 3. he declareth that the cause of our justification is the only mercy of the Father promised freely unto us for his son Christs sake and for the merit of his passion yet good works are necessary with inward contrition charity and other spirituall graces and good motions that is when wee have received remission of our sins or are justified we must give obedience unto God in observing his Law 4. he commandeth pastors to teach their people that images should not be worshipped and are but representers of vertue and good example and therefore no incence knieling nor offering should be done unto them 5. Saints are to be praised or Christ is to be praised in them for their graces and good example that they have left unto us but wee obtain all grace by the only Mediation of Jesus Christ and of none other 6. concerning ceremonies as holy vestures holy water bearing candles on Candlemes-day and some such others he admits them to be good so far as they put men in remembrance of spirituall things but so that they contain in them no power to remit or take a way sin c. There he addeth other iniunctions specially he causethto translate the Bible and commandeth all priests to have a Latine and English Bible lying open in their parish-churches that whosoever pleaseth may read them Then diverse images were demolished An. 1538 especially the most notable stocks of idolatry at Walsingham Worchester ... which had devices to role their â—ies and to stirre other parts of their body and many other false juglings wherewith simple people had been deceived all which was then made known and destroyed Jo. Foxe in Acts. In the same year followeth the ruine of all religious as they had been called houses by advice of the same L-Cromwell Lord of the privy seale So that all friers Nuns and sects of religion were rooted out of England to the number of 645. Abbeys priories and Nuneries and by Act of Parliament their lands did return to the heirs of the first Donours All that time Steeven Gardener Bishop of Winchester so dealt with the king by representing unto him the grudge of his subjects for rejecting the pope and for his dealing toward his wifes he had then married Anna Sister to the Duke of Cleve An. 1539. and for these his late doings that he persuadeth him for taking away suspicion of heresy to consent unto the burning of John Lambert yea Gardener prevaileth so that the king hearkned no more unto L. Cromwell but contrariwise he beheaded him and Walter L. Hungerford July 28 An. 1540. Tho. Cooper He made an Act discharging the Translation of the Bible made by W. Tindall and restraining the authorized Translation with many limitations An. 34. Henr. VIII It came then to passe that the estate of Religion seemed more and more to decay and popish injunctions were authorized establishing Transubstantiation vowes of chastity private Masses and auricular confession and forbidding communion in both kinds and marriage of priests wherefore some said Henry had forsaken the Pope but not popery and he annulled not those former Statutes Such was the craft of the venemous serpent But God raiseth up some good instruments for Thomas Cranmer archb of Canterburry resists Gardener and the Counsel of England was divided some were for the old Religion and some for the Reformed and Statutes of both sorts were in force So in one day at Smith field An. 1541. Gardener with his faction for refusing his articles caused burn three godly men Do. Robert Barnes Tho. Garret Will Jerom priests and Tho Cranmer with his side caused hang drawe and quarter other three Ed. Powell Ric. Fetherston Tho. Abell for denying the kings Supremacy and maintaining the Bishop of Rome's authority Jo. Foxe in Acts. A stranger beholding these said Good God how can men live here on the one side Papists are hanged and on the other anti-papists are burnt The people were brought marvelously into doubt of Religion All the number of them which suffered in England for maintaining Papacy which was called Treason wer 24 persons but of the other sort many were burnt and so many were imprisoned the same year that room could not be found in the prisons of London and many were kept in other houses by intercession of the L. Chanceller Audley many of them were given to the custody of Noble men where they were used favourably In that year Henry was divorced from his fourth wife by Sentence of his Clergy which did hate her for Lutheranisme as they spoke yet with her own consent and within a month he married Catherin Howard a brothers daughter of the house of Norfolk the next year she was accused of adultery with Tho. Culpeper and beheaded in the Tower with Jane Lady Rocheford as accessory unto her deeds After that Henry began to misse his good Counseller L. Cromwell and to perceive the scope of Gardener he wrote unto Archbisbop Cranmer to reforme pilgrimages and idolatry and he permits to eat flesh in Lent pretending a civill respect and the benâ—fite of the people But bloodie Gardener â—easeth not from persecution and burnt in one fire Ro. Testwood Ja. Filmer Jo. Marbeck and Antonie pierson at Winchester An. 1543 and great numbers at Calice amongst whom was the abovenamed Alex. Seton The Commissioners of this bloody Inquisition were restrained by the Lords of parliament An. 1545 that no inditements should be received against any person but by the oaths of 12. men at least of honesty credite and free of malice Item that no person should be put in ward before his enditement were heard judged except at the Kings speciall command Item An. 35. Henr. VIII c. 16. it was enacted that the king should have full authority to appoint 16. of the clergy and 16 of the Temporalty to peruse and examine the canons constitutions and ordinances Provincial and Synodal and according to their discretions with his Royall consent to setle and establish an order of Ecclesiasticall lawes to be observed in time coming in all spirituall courts As these Acts did in some measure shew the mind of the King so Gardener ceaseth not yea he spareth not the godly Lady the Kings sixth wife and sent to apprehend her but by her wisedom and submission unto the King she was saved out of the butchers handes In a word Henry was much led by his Counsellers he died in January 1547. When he saw death approaching he nameth his son Edward to be his heire and failing him he appointeth the Crown unto Mary and failing her unto Elisabeth he appointeth 16. Counsellours as Governours of his son amongst whom were Th. Cranmer and Gardener but afterward he caused to blott out Gardeners name because said he he would trouble all the rest he is of so turbulent a spirit The chieff of these Counsellers was Edward Seymer Earle of Herford uncle to king
four dayes after his coming from Dundie that town was infected with the pest Upon this occasion he leaves Kyle with the grief of many and returnes to Dundy being confident that in that visitation they would hearken unto the comfort of the Word Because some were sick and some were clean he stood upon the east port and preached both in the hearing of the sick without and of the cleane within They hearken then unto him with such comfort that they wish to dy rather than live thinking that possibly they could not have such comfort afterwards He spareth not to visite the sick both with bodily and spirituall refreshment The Cardinal was enraged at this preaching and hireth a frier to kill him but Cod made his servant to espy the weapon under the friers goun and to gripe his hand The people would have used violence against the frier but he stayd them saying He hath done mee no wrong but rather good and shewes that I have need to take heed unto myself The frier declares who had sent him and was let go When the plague ceaseth in Dundy he returnes to Montros to visite the Church there and ministreth the Communion with both elements in Dun. From thence he was called by the gentle men of the West to meet them at Edinburgh because they intend to seek a dispute with the Bishops In the way he lodged at Innergoury in the house of James watson there it was revealed unto him that he was to glorify God shortly by martyrdom and not many shall suffer after him When he told these things unto others in that house he said also The glory of God shall triumph clearly in this realme in spite of Satan but alas if the people shall become unthankfull fearfull shall their plagues bee When he came to Edinburg these of Kyle came not he preaches sometimes there and some times in Lieth within privat houses at the entreaty of some he preached now in Brounstoun then in Ormestoun and somtimes in Hadingtoun in that town for feare of the Earle Bothuell few did hear him and he foretold the desolation that came on that town When he returned to Ormestoun he told that he was to be apprehended shortly the same night Bothuell comes with a number of armed men at the instigation of the Cardinal Wishart yeelds himself and is convoyd to Edinburgh and then to Santandrews There he was accused upon the doctrin of justifiâ—ation he defends himself by the Scriptures Neverthelesss he is condemned and burnt March 1. year 1546. When he was in the fire the Captain of the castle went near him and in few words exhorts him to be of good courage and crave pardon of his sins from God He ansvereth This fire is grievous to my body but touches not my soule yet said he pointing at the Card. he who so proudly lookes out of his window shall be shortly layd forth ignominiously Many of the Nobility were rather provoked than afrayd with such cruelty and they began to think Some thing must de attempted with hazert rather than always suffer shamefully So Normand Lesley the eldest son to the Earle of Rothes whom the Card. had much respected and other 16 persones conspire his death Buchanan Lib. 15 Histor saith a private quarrel moved them May 7. in the morning when the masons were wont to be let in to work they kil the porter at the gate and then having locked the gate they kill the Carldinal in his bedchamber A noise ariseth in the City some would climb the walls then the murderers lay the corps forth at the window whence he had beheld the burning of Mr Wishart to shew that their business was too late The report is quickly spred some said God had done justly albeit the attempt was wicked I passe over what was done by the Regent to punish the fact and how they keep the castle If we will judge of the fact by the event some of these murderers died in prison some in the galeys some escaped but all died miserably Nor did the posterity of the Cardinal enjoy long prosperity for his three daughters were Ladies of Crawford Vain and Kelly in Anguise and all these families are now ruined He gave good estates unto his three sons but none of their posterity have any heritage that he gave them but I return to the history Because the Scots were intending a match with France a fleet of ships sent from England arrive at Lieth unaworse they spoile Edinburgh and the country thereabout and sent their ships loadned with spoile again in the same year The Regent and Queen bring some aid from France but the country was a common prey to both the Nations and they were divided among themselves some adhering unto England and their first Contract and others pretending the old league with France but indeed cleaving to idolatry whereupon followed that infortunat battell at Pinky on the tenth of September An. 1547. The warrs continue some years betwixt the two Nations and the Queen was sent to France in April An. 1548. John Knox hapned to be within the castle of Saintandrews when the last siege began and was carried away to France with the others because it was made cleare that he was not at the murder nor did consent unto the other crimes he was set at liberty and went to Geneva thence he was called to the Ministry of Englishes at Frankeford In the year 1553. Mary being Queen of England peace was concluded with France England Scotland The next year the Queen Dowager went to France and procureth that the Regent was moved to dimit his office they terrify him that within a few years he may be called to account of his intromission and in present contentation the King of France gave him the Dukedom of Chatterault So he resigneth his office in Parliament unto the Ambassadour Mons d'Osell in favours of Q. Mary and her Curatours King of France and Duke of Guise The Ambassadour delivereth instantly the same office unto the Q. Dowager Then the Prelates thought that none durst open a mouth against them but the provident eie of God brought from England in time of persecution under Mary some learned men as Wi harlaw John willock c. and Jo. Knox returnes in the end of the year 1555. Before his coming the best Another step of Reformation men thought it not a sin to be present at Masse he by authority of Gods word persuades them to abhor it He abode at Dun and was exercised dayly in preaching then he went unto Calder where the Lord Erskin L. Lorn and James Priour of Sant Andrews son of James V. and sundry other Noble men were his hearers He went to Finlastoun and preaches before the Zealous Earle of Glencairn he ministreth the Lords supper wherever he preacheth When the Bishops heard of this they summon him to appear at Edinburg May 15. An. 1556. The Bishops assemble not and he preaches in the Bishop of Dunkells loding
to his words This is my body This is my blood So now sitting in the glory of Majesty he reaches by the hands of Ministers Such is his Divine virtue and power unto communicants his body and blood Therefore the Latine Church was wont to pray before the communion Let us lift up our hearts unto the Lord For as in the first institution of the Supper the Disciples had their eies fixed on the Lord who sitting at table reached unto them the Holy Supper So we should lift up our hearts unto the heavens unto him who sitting in the glory of Majesty reaches in the Supper by the hands of Ministers unto communicants his true body and blood that it may be the meat drink of the inward man who thereby is fed nurished and groweth unto everlasting life Whence Bernard speaking of the Supper saith This is the food not of the belly but of the soul for it is not given to repair the ruin of this life which is a vapor for a litle time but to confer eternal life unto the soul And as the water being sprinkled in Baptism hath done it's part so the bread eaten and the wine being drunken in the H. Supper have done their part but the spirituall virtue is possessed by faith and the verity of Christs body and blood is also maintained So Heming About the year 1571. this controversy waxed hote for in Witteberg Cas Cruciger the later Chr. Pezelius Fr. Widebram Henry Moller and others were against the Vbiquity and for it were these of Iena chiefly and with them were sundry other towns as Brunswic Luneburg c. In the same year Augustus the Elector of Saxony conveeneth the Divines of Witteberg and Leipsich into Dresda there they declared that they held no other doctrin but what was in the Confession of Ausburgh and agreeth with Luther and Melanthon's writings and they published their consent Against this consent Lucas Osiander and Selneccer and Jacob Andreiae did publish other books The Wittebergers wrote their Apology This contention waxeth hoter and hoter untill the year 1577. when George Count of Henneberg in a private conference said unto the Elector The Divines of Witteberg do foster some errors which can not be dissembled nor approved by the sincere Ministers of the Church neither is there hope of true peace among the followers of the Augustan Confession until these errours be noted and condemned The Elector answered I wish an harmony and that the corruptions were marked and that there were some beginning of so necessary and profitable a work I for my part will further it according to my power George undertook it At that time the Papists did upbraid them with their divisions and said There be so many parties among them of the Augustan Confession that if any would leave Papistry they know not unto what sect they shall cleave Osiandet histo Lib. 4. c. 2. shewes another ground of their variance that since the time of that unhappy Interim the corruptions and errors which began at that time could not be amended And it may be added that in all the periods of attempting reconciliations some did hold the points where-in they did agree at those several times and others would not accept them And Melanthon whose authority was much respected did for peace smooth his Common places in the year 1546. and again in the year 1558. for which cause the rigider sort called him a temporizer as also in the year 1552. he wrote a Confession of faith to have bin presented unto the the Councel at Trent This was and yet is called The Confession of Saxony and was subscribed also by the Ministers of Misnia In the year 1578. the Elector and the Count of Henneberg meet again at the marriage of Lewes Duke of Wurtembergh After the solemnity these three being together the Count shewes the Duke what conference had been before for removing the scandal of division then by common advice Lucas Osiander and Balthasar Bidembachius two Divines of Wurtembergh were appointed to pen some Overtures for removing those controversies Liber Concordiae This was done so privily that no other knew it but those Princes yea their Secretaries heard not of it When those two had written their judgement were assembled at Maulbron two Divines of Wurtembergh two of Hennebergh and one of Bada They examin and change as they thought expedient Osiand Lib. Cit. Cap. 3. Then their work was sent unto the Elector of Saxony and he cailed for Jacob Andreae Chemnitius and Selneccer and gave them the book they judge it too brief and enlarge it with other arguments and other questions This book was sent then unto sundry Vniversities and towns to be freely censured that if any thing were to be amended added or empaired they should admonish ingenvously Ibid. Cap. 4. The Electors of Saxony and Brandeburgh caused it to be subscribed by 8000. to wit by sundry Princes Imperial Towns and their Ministers and it was printed in the year 1580. with the title Liber Concordiae It was not examined in a publick Synod and was still conceiled from those Churches which did oppose Vbiquity and some within these Princes Dominions were displaced for refusing to subscribe it and without any reasoning So it turned into the Book of discord and made the greatest rent of all The book contained elleven Heads having first layd this ground that the books of the old and new Testament are the only rule whereby the doctrine of faith is to be judged and all other writtings may be vsed as witnesses only The first Head is of original sin where they teach that it is neither the nature nor any part of the nature of man but a corruption of nature leaving in man nothing sound or uncorrupt and can be known by the revealed word of God only II. of the free-will in the first act of regeneration that God worketh the conversion by the means of the word preached and by opening the heart to hearken so that it is the work of God only making man who is ignorant and unwilling to see and will III. Of righteousnes before God they declare it to be the righteousnes of Christ God-man for which God absolves us from our sins without any respect of the merite of our good works either by past present or to come And faith trusting in Christ and working by love is the only instrument whereby we apprehend the same Neither should a true believer doubt of the remission of his sins notwithstanding his sins of infirmity IV. Concerning good works they hold that these are not the cause of justification nor of eternall life but all men especially the regenerat are debters of good works yet so that they condem those positions Good works are necessary to salvation No man was ever saved without good works and it is impossible to be saved without good works And faith in Christ can not be lost and the elect do retain the Holy Ghost even though they fall into
adultery or other crimes and continue in them V. Of the law and the gospell they say Whatsoever in the holy Scripture is against sin belongs unto the law and the gospell properly is the doctrine teaching what man who hath not satisfied the law should believe to wit that Christ hath satisfied for all our sins and hath obtained remission but in a large sense the doctrine of repentance may be called the gospell And they condem it as pernicious and false to say The gospell properly is the doctrine of repentance or that it is not the only preaching of Gods grace VI. concerning the use of the law Albeit believers be free from the curse and coaction of the law yet they are not lawless but the law must be preached both unto the unconverted and converted yet with this different issue that those who obey for fear of the curse are said to do the works of the law and who being regenerat do obey willingly as if there were no curse nor reward are said to obey the law of Christ and the law of the mind neither are they under the law but under grace VII concerning the Lord's Supper they first condem those as crafty and deceiving Sacramentarians who believe the true presence of the very substantial and lively body and blood of Christ and that the presence and eating of it is spiritual by faith next they hold that the body and blood of Christ is truly and substantially there and is truly distributed with the bread and wine and received not only by them who come worthily but by the unworthy albeit by the one sort unto their confort and the other to their judgement and damnation unless they repent And the grounds of this their faith are 1. Jesus Christ is very God and man in one person undivided and inseparable 2. the right hand is every where and Christ in his manhood is set at the right hand of God 3. the words of the institution are not false 4. God knowes many wayes and can be present as he pleaseth neither is he tied to that only way which the philosophers call Local And so the body of Christ is present not only spiritually but also bodily yet not Capernaiticaly but in a spirituall and heavenly manner in respect of the sacramental union Thirdly they condem Popish transsubstantiation the sacrifice the refusing of the cup c. VIII of the person of Christ they say albeit the Godhead and manhood of Christ retain their several properties yet they are vnited personaly not as two planks conioined but as iron and fire or he soul and the body Wherefore among other articles they condem them who hold that only the manhood suffered and only the Godhead is present with us in the sacrament and in all our crosses or that this presence is not in respect of his manhood and the Sone of God doth not all the works of his omnipotency in and with and by his manhood and Christ in respect of his manhood is not capable of omnipotency and other Divine properties IX Concerning Christ's descending into hell they say It should not be curiously disputed but be believed simply that he descended into hell and overcame the power of death and Satan but when and how it can not be known in this life X. concerning Eclesiastical ceremonies which are not commanded nor forbidden in the Worde they say those are not any part of Divine worship and may be changed as the edification of the Church in several times and places shall require yet without levity and scandal and in time of persecution when a constant confession is required nothing should be yielded unto the enemies of the gospell or for their sake XI Concerning eternal predestination first they distinguish between prescience and predestination prescience say they is common to the estate of the godly and ungodly and is not the cause of sin in any man but predestination or election concerneth the godly only this can not be searched among the hid decrees of God but in the reveeled word which teaches that God hath shut up all men under unbelief that he might have mercy on all and willeth not that any man should perish but rather that all men should repent and believe in Christ neither is any saved but who believe in him And where it is said Many are called but few chosen it is not to be so understood as if God would not have allmen to be saved but to shew that the cause of the damnation of the wicked is their not-hearing or contempt of Gods word And they have no mention of reprobation They have a twelth Head against the heresies of Anabaptists Arians and Antitrinitarians This book was the occasion of an open separation The next year the Divines of the Palatinate reply under the name of Admonitio Neostadiana confirming the ortho doxe doctrine concerning the Person of Christ and the Supper shewing the false imputations of errors examining the authority and true sense of the Augustan Confession discovering the indirect means of penning and seeking subscriptions of that book and demonstrating the uniust condemnation of the true doctrine When this book was published some that had subscribed the former book declared that they had subscribed with limitations and not absolutely as the book was published and they recalled their subscriptions and the contrivers of that book replied under the title Apologia Erfurtensis So much was written pro and con The points wherein they insist most were the question of the Lord's Supper the communication of the Divine attributes unto the manhood and vniversal grace Unto those of the Palatinate were joyned the Princes and Ministers of Anhalt and Nassaw the Helvetians and many Cities of Germany besides those of other Nations Untill this day it is cleare that those Vbiquitaries inveigh most bitterly against their adversaries and impute many errors unto them falsely by which two means they a lienate the simpler sort from all reconciliation This difference occasioned the compacting of the Harmony of Confessions After that time there were other Conferences between these parties but all in vain V. In Constantinople the Muffti or highpriest of the Turks dealt with Troubles in the Greek Church Amurathes to take all the churches of the city from the Christians The Greeks Armenians and other Christian Nations did interceed in the contrary alledging the liberty that was granted by Mahomet 2. and others his successors The Muffti answered That liberty was granted when few Turks were in the city but now when there be so many of their own Religion Christians should have no place within the walls Two churches were taken from them and Amurathes turned all his wrath against the Patriarch and caused lead him in an iron-chain through the city and then banished him unto Rhodes Sundry causes were alledged as that he had caused the Christians receive the new Calendare of Rome to the scandal of many he had pronounced a Sentence of divorcement against a Noble
whom and another in or to whom it is done God is the Author of salvation and free-will is capable onely we have will from free-will but not the power to do what we will I say not will to do good or will to do evil but onely will for to do well is increase to do ill is decrease to will simply is that which increaseth or decreaseth Creating grace made free-will saving grace maketh it to increase but it prostrateth it self to decrease so free-will maketh us willing and grace maketh us to will well Near the end he saith What hast thou that thou hast not received thou art created healed saved Man which of these hast thou of thy self which of these is not impossible unto free-will thou which wast not could not create nor being a sinner couldest thou justifie nor being dead couldest raise thy self I do pass these good things that are necessary unto them which must be healed and laid up for them that shall be saved but what I say is clear for the first and last as none doubted of the middle thing but he who knoweth not the righteousness of God and would set up his own not being subject unto the righteousness of God And he concludeth there Without doubt it is of God both to will and to do according to his good will therefore God is the Author of thy good work he both applieth the will unto work and maketh the work easie unto will or if we will speak properly these which we call our merits are some seeds of hope proofs of love tokens of hid predestination presages of future felicity the way of the Kingdom not the cause of reigning In a word whom he justifieth not whom he findeth just doth he glorifie In fest omnium Sanct. Ser. 1. What can all our righteousness avail before God shall it not be reputed as a filthy rag saith the Prophet and if it be narrowly examined all our righteousness shall be found unrighteousness and naught and if our righteousness cannot stand for it self what shall become of our sins therefore we must pray with the Psalmist Lord enter not into judgement with thy servant and with all humility let us flee unto mercy which onely can save our souls And Ser. 2. Who can say I have a clean heart who can say The snare is broken and my feet are safe from falling seeing the Apostle saith Let him who standeth take heed lest he fall and of himself he saith O wretched man who shall deliver me In Annunt B. Mariae Serm. 1. Thou must first believe that thou canst not have remission of sin but by the mercy of God next that thou canst not have any good work unless he give even that thirdly that thou canst by no works merit eternal life but that it is given freely for the Apostle saith We are justified freely by faith Who is a better man then the Prophet of whom God witnesseth I have found a man according to mine own heart and nevertheless he had need to say Lord enter not into judgement with thy servant therefore let no man deceive himself In Feria 4. Heb. Dom. Paenos Worthy is the Lamb which was slain to receive power for doing that he came for to take away the sins of the world I mean a three-fold sin waxing on the earth think ye that I will say the lust of the flesh the lust of the eyes and the pride of life indeed that is a three-fold cord which is not easily broken but I intend to speak of another threefold sin which also the vertue of the Cross doth overcome possibly that may be heard with more profit the first is original another is personal and the third is singular Original sin is the greatest of all sin which we all have from the first Adam in whom we all have sinned and for which we all do die certainly it is the greatest which hath so defiled all mankinde that there is none free none save one it is extended from the first man until the last and this poison in each one runneth from the sole of the foot unto the top of the head yea also it is spread abroad through every age from the day when each man is conceived by his mother until that day when the common mother receiveth him and certainly that original sin is very grievous and infecteth not onely the person but even nature and yet personal sin is more grievous unto every one when with loose reins we give our members as weapons of unrighteousness unto sin being guilty now not so through the fault of another but by our own fault the singular fault is the most grievous which is done against the Lord of Majesty when wicked men kill a just man unjustly How wilt thou Lord make the thirsty drink of the river of thy pleasure who so doest pour the oyl of thy mercy on them who crucifie thee It is clear then that this passion is most powerful to take away all sorts of sins And in the next Sermon De caena Dom. A Sacrament is a holy sign or a holy secret thing for many things are done for themselves onely but other things are done to sanctifie other things and these are called and are signs for to take example from usual things a ring is given simply for a ring and there is no signification and it is given for investing into an inheritance and then it is a sign so that he which receiveth it may say This ring is little worth but the inheritance was I seeking After this maner when the Lord was to suffer he would invest his disciples in his grace that invisible grace was given unto them by a visible sign For this end were all the Sacraments ordained as the Eucharist the washing of feet and Baptism the first of all Sacraments wherein we are complanted to the similitude of his death What is the grace into which we are invested by Baptism certainly cleansing away of sin for who can bring a clean thing out of unclean but he onely who is clean and on whom sin falleth not even God and indeed the Sacrament of this grace before was circumcision I have often said it unto you nor should ye ever forget it that in the fall of our first parents we all did fall and we have fallen upon a heap of stones and among clay so that we are not onely defiled but wounded and broken grievously we may be washed soon but we have need of much dressing ere we be healed we are washed in Baptism and thereby is the hand-writing of damnation blotted away and this grace is given unto us that lust should not hurt us if we do not consent unto it and so the corrupt matter of that old ulcer is removed when damnation is taken off and the answer of death proceedeth from it But who can endure the itching of that ulcer be of good chear that in this also grace will help and that ye may be assured ye
have the investiture of the Sacrament note of the Lord 's precious body and blood for that Sacrament worketh two things in us it diminisheth the feeling in the smaller sins and taketh away the consent in the more grievous If now any of you do not feel so oft so bitter motions of wrath envy letchery and such others let him give thanks unto the body and blood of our Lord because the vertue of the Sacrament worketh in him and he should rejoyce that the wretched ulcer is like to be healed But what shall we do seeing so long as we are in this body of sin and in this evil time we cannot be without sin shall we despair God forbid Blessed John saith If we say we have no sin we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us but if we confess our sins God is faithful to In many things we all offend yet none should dispise or think little of that for it is impossible to be saved with these and it is impossible they can be washed away but by Jesus Christ and unless he wash them I say therefore let none be perniciously careless and use the words of wickedness to excuse his sins for as he said unto Peter unless Christ shall wash them away we shall have no part with him and yet we should not for them be too solicitous he will forgive as readily and gladly if we acknowledge what we are for in such sins as inevitable both immoderate fear and carelesness is worthy of blame hence it is that he hath taught us to pray dayly for the forgiveness of sins for as I said of lust he hath taken away the damnation of it as the Apostle saith There is no damnation unto them that are in Christ nevertheless for to humble us he suffereth it to live in us and to afflict us grievously that we may know what grace doth unto us and that we should always run unto him for help so doth he with us in these lesser sins by a pious dispensation that they are not altogether taken away but by them God will teach us that seeing we cannot shun these lesser things we might be sure we do not overcome greater sins by our own strength and so we should be ever in fear and watchful that we lose not his grace which we see to be so many ways necessary unto us Super. Cant. Serm. 13. Hearken what God saith My glory I will not give unto another Lord what wilt thou give unto us he saith Peace I give unto you peace I leave unto you It is enough for me I take it thankfully what thou leavest and I leave what thou reservest so I am content and I doubt not but it is for my advantage I do altogether abjure glory lest if I do usurp what is not given I do miss that which is offered and lose it justly peace I would have and I desire no more he who is not content with peace is not content with thee for thou art our peace who hast made both one this is necessary this is enough to be reconciled with thee and to be reconciled with thy self for since I became an adversary unto thee I have been grievous unto my self and now I am more wary and I would not be ingrate for the benefit of peace which thou givest nor a sacrilegious usurper of thy glory unto thee Lord unto thee be glory wholly happy am I if I have peace Serm. 14. The Law which never brought any man to perfection is a yoke that neither they nor their fathers could ever bear but the Synagogue is strong and careth not for a light burthen nor a sweet yoke she is whole needeth not a physician and trusteth in the Law Ser. 22. Whosoever being grieved for his sins hungreth and thirsteth for righteousness let him believe in thee who justifiest the ungodly and being justified by onely faith he hath peace with God Ser. 61. Confidently will I take what I have need of out of the bowels of the Lord they abound in mercy the piercing nail is unto me an opening key that I may see the Lord's will why should I not see through these holes the nails cry the wounds cry that verily God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself therefore the mercy of the Lord is my merit I shall not have need of merits so long as he wanteth not merits and if the mercies of the Lord be manifold I have merit enough Shall I sing of thy righteousness Lord I will mention thy righteousness only for it is also mine seeing that thou wast made even of God to be righteousness unto me Shall I fear that it be not sufficient for us both it is not a short mantle the righteousness of the Lord endureth for ever What is longer then eternity it will cover both thee and me sufficiently it is a large and eternal righteousness and indeed in me it will cover a multitude of sins but in thee Lord what will it cover but treasures of piety and riches of bountifulness Ser. 62. The vine of the Lord is the Church of them who are predestinated Ser. 63. What is so powerful to heal the wounds of conscience and to purge the sight of the minde as the frequent meditation of Christ's wounds Ser. 65. By the vine I mean her which filleth the earth whereof we are a portion that large vine planted by the Lord's hand redeemed by his blood watered with his word propagated by his grace and made fertile by his Spirit Ser. 66. The Spirit saith manifestly that in the last days some shall depart from the faith giving heed unto the spirits of errors and doctrines of divels certainly he speaketh of these men now for they forbid to marry and abstain from meat which God hath created but see now whether this be not properly the craft of the divel and not of men as the Spirit hath foretold Ask the Author of that Sect they can give you none What Heresie hath not a principal Author among men the Manichees had Manes each of these pests had their master from whom they had their beginning and name but what name or title will ye give these none because that Heresie is not from men and yet we will not say that it is by the revelation of Christ but rather and without doubt as the Spirit hath fortold by the fraud of divels speaking lyes in hypocrisie and forbidding to marry certainly they speak so in hypocrisie and guile of the fox faining that they do it for love of chastity which they have devised to increase and multiply filthiness The matter is so plain that I admire how a Christian could ever be perswaded thereunto except they are so beastly that they could not perceive how he that condemneth marriage looseth the bridle unto all uncleanness or certainly they are so full of wickedness and divelish malice that though they know it yet they dissemble and rejoyce in the destruction of men Take away
they call it and there they corrupt their judgements with apparent arguments and with alledging unto them texts of Logick of natural Philautia Metaphysick moral Philosophy and all manner of books of Aristotle and of all manner of Doctors One holdeth this another that one is a real another a nominal What wonderful dreams have they of their predicaments universals second intentions quiddities hecceities and relatives and whether this proposition be true Non ens est aliquid whether ens be aequivocum or univocum Ens is a voice only say some ens is univocum saith another and descendeth into ens creatum increatum per modos intrinsecos When they have this way brawled 8 10 or 12. years or more and after that their judgements are utterly corrupt then they begin their Divinity not at the Scripture but every man taketh a sundry Doctor which Doctors are as sundry and divers the one contrary unto the other as there be divers fashions and monstrous shapes none like another among our Sects of Religion every Religion every University and almost every man hath a sundry Divinity Whatsoever opinions every man findeth with his Doctor that is his Gospel and that only is true with him and that he holdeth all his life long and every man to maintain his Doctor corrupteth the Scripture and fashioneth it after his own imagination as a Potter doth his clay And in the margin Yet in this they all agree That no man is saved by Christ but by holy works and that Christ hath given up his God-head unto the Pope and all his power and that the Pope may give Christ's merits to whom he will and take them from whom he will Of what Text thou provest Hell another will prove Purgatory another Lymbus patrum and another the Assumption of our Lady and another will prove out of the same Text that an Ape hath a tail and of what Text the Gray-Frier proveth that our Lady was without original sin out of the same shall the Black-Frier prove that she was conceived in original sin and all this they do with apparent reasons with false similitudes and with arguments and perswasions of mans wisdom ..... The wisdom of one is that a white coat is best to serve God in another a black another a gray another a blew and while one saith God will hear your prayer in this place another saith in that place and while one saith this place is holier another saith that place is holier this Religion is holier then that this Saint is greater with God then that and an hundred thousand such things c. And if ye will hear a Papist writing of those times Corn. Agrip. De triplici ratione cognoscendi Deum c. 4. de vanitat scien c. 97. describes them thus Scholastical Divinity by little and little is turned into Sophistry while the latter Theosophists and huksters of God's word which are Divines but by a bought title of so sublime a faculty have made a kind of Logomachy moving questions forging opinions and doing violence unto the Scriptures by intricate words putting a strange sense upon them readier to winnow then examine presuming to device many seminaries of contentions whereby they furnish matter of strife unto the wrangling Sophists when they abstract forms call the words genera species some cleave to the things and others to the names and what they take from one they adscribe unto another and some take it indifferently and every one studies how to prove his own heresie and they turn the sacred faith into sport and infidelity whereof Tho. Aquin. did complain among the wise of this age while they dispise the Canonical Scriptures of the holy Ghost and chose unto themselves many questions of divine things to foster brawlings wherein exercising their wits and wasting their time they will have all the doctrine of Divinity to consist in such things If any will oppose unto them the authority of the holy Scriptures he shall hear anon The letter killeth it is pernitious it is unprofitable but say they we must search what is hid in the letter and then turning to their interpretations glosses and syllogisms they allow any sense rather then the proper sense of the words If you do urge them instantly you shalt receive reproaches and be called an ass which understands not what is hid in the letter but as a serpent eatest the earth only so that among them none are thought to be Divines but who can contend to purpose and give an instance in every matter and quickly devise new meanings making a noise with so monstrous words that he be understood by none and then are they called Subtle Angelical Seraphical and divine Doctors when they talk so that no man understands them These wicked Hypocrites and presumptuous Sophists which as Paul saith teach not Christ of good will but for strife have brought in so many heresies that the Philosophers shall sooner accord then these Divines which have killed all that glory of ancient Divinity with opinions of men and new errors and labyrinrhs of infinite expositions which they have devised under disguised titles they profess detestable doctrine and falsly usurp the name of sacred Divinity and abusing the names and doctrine of the holy Doctors they introduce Sects as it was said in the Church I am Apollo's I am Pauls I am Cephas's pretending regard of them by whose means they began to know and swearing to the words of their Master they dispise all others not regarding what is said but who hath said it And no Divine is thought to be truly learned which hath not addicted himself unto some Sect and maintains it stoutly and covets to be named and advanced by the title thereof as a Thomist Albertist Scotist Occamist for it is no credit unto such Masters to be called Christians since that name is common to Butchers Cooks Bakers and every body and these Sectators are divided again many ways .... Moreover they do forge so many strange things of God so many forms of the God-head and so many Idols of phantasies concerning divine things and they pull Christ our Savior into pieces with the wickedness of their opinions and clothe him with so many vizards of sophisms and as an Idol of wax they forge and reforge him into any shape they please by their absurd suppositions that their doctrine may be called meer Idolatry I pass over the debates and heresies concerning the Sacraments Purgatory Primacy the commandments of Popes and obligations thereunto concerning Indulgences Antichrist to come and many such things wherein they shew mad wisdom with the presumption whereof they are puft up like the Giants in the Fables Then coming to the Preachers he saith They make stories of the Saints with pious lyes they counterfeit reliques they devise miracles and which they call examples plausible and terrible fables they number prayers weigh merits measure ceremonies sell indulgences distribute pardons make merchandise of good works and by begging they
eat the sins of the people and they spake as assuredly of the apparitions adjurations and responses of the dead as if they had learned them from the books of Tundalus and Brandarius or from St. Patrick's cave they play the Tragedies of them in Purgatory and the Comedies of Indulgences in Pulpits as on a Stage with so Soldier-like boldness so thrasonical boasting so arrogant eys changing their countenances stretching out their arms with so various gestures as the Poets feign Proteus transforming themselves they thunder unto the people with windy tongues and Stentor's voice But they which are more ambitious among them and would have the gallantry of eloquence and perfect knowledge these in crying I would say declaring sing poesies tell stories dispute opinions cite Homer Virgil Iuvenal Persius Livius Strabo Varro Seneca Cicero Aristotle Plato and for the Gospel and word of God they prattle meer toys and words of men preaching another gospel adulterating the word of God which they preach not in sincerity but for gain and reward and they live not according to the truth of the word but after the lusts of the flesh and when in the day they have spoken of vertue erroneously they bestow the night in the Stews and this is their way to go unto Christ c. Erasmus in his Annotations on 1 Tim. 1. at the word Vaniloquium speaketh of the School-men at that time thus What shall I say of ungodly questions which are made concerning the power of God and of the Pope whether God can command any evil as to hate himself and forbid all good even the love and worship of himself whether he can make a thing infinite in respect of all dimensions whether he could have made this world even from eternity in a better condition then he hath made it whether he could have made a man that cannot sin ..... There is more work concerning the power of the Pope while they argue of his two-fold power and whether he may abrogate what is decreed in the writings of the Apostles whether he may decree what is repugnant unto the doctrine of the Gospel whether he may make a new Article of faith whether he hath more power then Peter had or equal power whether he hath power to command the Angels whether he can make empty that which is called Purgatory whether he be a man only or as God whether he partaketh of both natures as Christ doth whether he be more merciful then Christ seeing we do not read that Christ did ever bring any out of Purgatory whether among all men the Pope alone cannot err Six hundred such questions are disputed in great volumes ...... and their schools are earnest about such questions and time the swiftest of all things is wasted with these questions which are propounded ridiculously and determined timerariously our time is short and it is a difficult thing to act the duty of a Christian rightly The third power of the Friers was to proclaim and sell Indulgences Because this falleth in often I will here only repeat the Indulgences words of Pa. Paulo in the first book of the Councel of Trent This manner of giving money for pardons was put in practise after the year 1100. for Pope Urban the II. having granted plenary Indulgences and remission of all sins to whosoever would fight in the holy Land to recover and set free the Sepulchre of Christ out of the power of the Mahumetans it is followed by his Suceessors of whom some as always new inventions are inlarged granted it unto those who would maintain a Soldier if they could not or would not go personally in these wars and thereafter Indulgences were granted unto such as would take Arms against Christians not obeying the Church of Rome and many times infinite exactions under these pretences And lib. 8. he saith It is sure and cannot be denied that in no Christian Nation of the East either in ancient or modern times was ever any use of Indulgences of any kinde whatsoever and in the West no proof of them can be brought before Pope Urban the II. from his time until the year 1300. it appeareth that the use of them was sparing and only imposed by the Confessor to free men from punishment after the Councel at Vienna the abuses did increase mightily Pol. Virg. de inven rer lib. 8. cap. 1. saith They reap no small harvest by these Indulgences especially Pope Boniface the IX in whose time such pardons were granted with a full hand not only at sometimes but as Platina witnesseth were sold dayly and every where as any other merchandise not without the dammage of the giver and receiver seeing by these as the vendible remedies or soul diseases many did the less abstain from sin and the power of the keys became contemptible and that was not without cause because as Jerome saith where a reward is the means or interveneth spiritual gifts become the more vile which oh if that age only had seen So far he 31. When the Tartars prevailed first in Asia the Kingdom of the Turks was overthrown and they were divided among themselves into seven families at last they became all subject unto the house of Othoman or Otman Laon. Chalcocon lib. 1. de Reb. Turc He was a victorious and cruel Tyrant and was declared first Emperor of the Turks about the year 1300. all his Successors have kept his name He conquered Prusa a City of Mysia An. 1303. and made it the seat of the Empire His Son Orcanes expelled the Tartars and others of them through dissensions among Christians have raised that great Empire of Asia and subdued the Empire of Constantinople as partly is said and more followeth CHAP. IV. Of BRITAIN 1. KIng Edward sent the marble Chair of the Scots unto London and Troubles between England and Scotland left nothing that he thought could excite the mindes of our Nation to any remembrance of former condition so he promised unto himself a final conquest but a fresh trouble ariseth upon occasion of his tyranny Robert Bruce the Son of the former competitor and John Cumine the Cousin-German of John Baliol beholding at Court the contempt which the Scots did suffer and considering how Edward had abused them against their native Countrey they thought upon a revenge yet they they durst not communicate their thoughts At last John perceiving the other pensive and thinking the same might be the cause of his sadness adventured first to discover his minde and he blamed himself and the other also that their Countrey-men had fallen into such miseries by their procurement and in the mean time were both frustrated There they promise taciturnity and mutual fidelity and they covenant that John shall never pretend any title unto the Crown but assist Robert to recover it and he shall have all the Lands belonging unto Robert and be second unto him in the Kingdom these things were written sworn and sealed Robert followeth King Edward still waiting opportunity Behold