hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light Col. 1.12 The first rise of Grace is in the bosom of eternal love the appearance of it in men is in supernatural gifts the period and center of it is in the Glory of Heaven Two things in this point of Grace offer themselves to our consideration the freeness of Grace and the Divine efficacy of it First The freeness of Grace is to be considered and that in two or three particulars 1. It is of Free-Grace that all mankind doth not eternally perish in the ruines of the fall That there is a possibility of Salvation for any one Son of Adam When the Angels sinned but one sin God turned them down into chains of darkness for ever Might he not in justice have dealt so with fallen men He was not bound to repair the Angels those golden Vessels once inmates of Heaven and who can who dares conceive such a thought That he was bound to repair men who are but Images of clay dwelling in the lower World I know many differences are assigned Man sinned by seduction Devils by self-motion in the fall of Man all the human nature fell in the fall of Angels all the Angelical nature fell not The sin of Angels was more damnable than Mans because their nature was more sublime than his Men are capable of repentance but Devils not because whatever they once choose they do will immovably But alas all these are but extra-Scriptural conjectures Man though tempted was voluntary in the transgression all men were involved in the fall but that 's no apology for the sin The sin of Man if not so high as that of Angels was yet a damnable one It is a vain dream to suppose that Almighty Grace could not have wrought a gracious change in Devils That which differences us from them is as the Scripture tells us no other than the meer Grace and Philanthropy of God towards us he might justly have left us under that wrath which our apostacy deserved Two things will make this evident 1. Original sin which reaches to all is properly sin and being such merits no less than eternal death We all sinned in Adams sin by that one man sin entred into the world The disobedience of that one constituted all sinners which unless it had been imputatively theirs it could never have done The want of Original righteousness is properly sin because it is the want of that which ought to be in us it ought to be in us because the pure spiritual Law calls for an holy frame of heart it ought to be in us or else we are not fallen creatures but are as we ought to be If it ought to be in us then the want of it is properly sin The Apostle proving that all are sinners and short of the Glory of God tells us That there is none righteous no not one none that understandeth none that seeketh after God They are all gone out of the way They are together become unprofitable There is no fear of God before their eyes Rom. 3. Which words denote a want of that habitual righteousness which ought to be in all even in little Infants That want is sin else the Apostle could not from thence conclude That all Infants not excepted have sinned and come short of the glory of God To want habitual righteousness which ought to be in us is to be sinners and short of our original That original concupiscence which is in all is properly sin it is over and over called sin in Scripture it is the root and black fountain of all impiety it is opposite to the Law and Spirit of God it impels to all sin it fights against all graces and particularly against that of love to God where the creature is inordinately loved there God is not loved with all the heart and Soul These things make it appear That Original sin is properly sin and if so it merits no less than death eternal The Scripture abundantly testifieth this The wages of sin is death but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord Rom. 6.23 In which we have a double Antithesis Wages is opposed to Gift and eternal Death to eternal Life By one man sin entred into the world and death by sin Rom. 5.12 Not meer infelicity but sin entred not meer temporal death but eternal followed upon it Hence the Apostle tells us That there was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 judgment unto condemnation and that upon all men vers 16 and 18. We are by nature children of wrath even as others Eph. 2.3 He doth not say by practise or custom but by nature we are Children of wrath that is worthy of it Nature as corrupted is here opposed to Grace which as the Text after speaks saves us wrath appertains to nature salvation to grace This one Text is as a stroke of Lightning * Hoc uno verbo quasi fulmine totus homo quantus quantus est prosternitur Bez. in Loc. to lay all men flat and prostrate before God even little Infants being unclean in themselves cannot if unregenerate stand at Gods right hand and enter into the holy Heavens they must therefore stand at his left and go into darkness Hence St. Austin †Finge Pelagiane locum ex officina perversi doginaâ—is tui ubi alieni a Christi gratia vitam requiei gloriae possidere parvuli possint Aust Hyp. l. 5. tells the Pelagians who denied Original sin That they must forge out of their Shop of Heresy a middle place for such Infants as are Aliens from the Grace of Christ If Infants are unregenerate they cannot enter Heaven the place of bliss If as the Pelagians say they are free from sin they cannot go to Hell the place of misery Tertium ignoramus A third place I know not nor can find any such in Scripture They are therefore subject to eternal death for their Original sin The sum of this Argument we have in Anselm Si originale peccatum sit aliquod peccatum De conc Virg. cap. 27. necesse est omnem in eo natum in illo non dimisso damnari If Original sin be sin it is necessary that every one born in it should be condemned for it unless it be pardoned it being impossible that any one should be saved so much as with one unremitted sin If Original sin be indeed sin and do merit death eternal then God may justly inflict that death for it seeing he cannot be unjust in doing an act of justice in inflicting that punishment which is due to sin 2. As on Mans part there is a merit of eternal death so on Gods the mission of Christ to save us was an act of meer Grace This is set forth in Scripture God commended his love towards us in that while we were yet sinners Christ died for us Rom. 5.8 In this was manifested the love of God towards us because he sent
crucified for us neither did it satisfie Justice on our behalf it is therefore Faith in its object that is Christ's Righteousness which justifies us against the Law that Faith which is counted for Righteousness is that which establishes the Law Vers 31. and that Establishment Faith makes not in it self but in its object Christ's Righteousness which established the Law by satisfying of it Faith therefore and its object must be taken together Hence the Apostle who mentions the Imputation of Faith Ver. 5. in the 4. Chapter mentions also the Imputation of Righteousness Ver. 6. It 's true both are but one in sence but in words the latter expresses the object of Faith as the former doth the Act Thus as I said before Faith in Conjunction with its object takes in the whole of Justification and then the after-words quoted out of the Psalm touching Remission do not describe the Imputation of Righteousness in its proper Nature but in its blessed Fruit viz. Pardon of sin which is not properly our Righteousness but a consequent upon it Another place is this Through this Man is preached unto you the Forgiveness of sin and by him all that believe are justified from all things from which you could not be justified by the Law of Moses Acts 13.38 39. Here it seems that what is called Remission in the first verse is called Justification in the next but I take it they are not the same in the 38. Ver. We have Remission in the offer or tender of the Gospel in the 39. we have Justification actual as it is in the Believer So they are not the same Justification here is not Remission but Justification by Sacrifice Justification by Christ's Sacrifice is opposed to Justification by the Legal ones Justification by these was typical and but in some cases the Law not allowing a Sacrifice in all but Justification by that is real and in all cases where Faith is not wanting here therefore Justification and Remission are not the same Another place is Luke 18. when the Publican penitentially prayed for Pardon God be merciful to me a Sinner he went home justified Vers 13 14. Justified is the same with Pardoned I answer This place shews that Justification follows upon true Repentance but not that Justification and Pardon are the same the Satisfaction of Christ justifies a Sinner a Pardon only frees him from punishment To name but one place more The free-Free-gift is of many offences to justification Rom 5.16 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the free-Free-gift seems here to import Pardon as if Pardon and Justification were all one To this I answer The Apostle in this famous place sets down a Parallel between the two Heads Adam and Christ Adam's Sin and Christ's Righteousness Adam's Sin making us Sinners unto death and Christ's Righteousness making us righteous unto Life But the word Pardon or Remission is not so much as once named in all the Parallel by the free-Free-gift Vers 16. is not meant Remission but Christ's Righteousness This is clear upon a double account the one is this The free-Free-gift is opposed to Adam's sin and that which in this Parallel is opposed to Adam's sin must needs be Christ's Righteousness this appears throughout the whole Parallel in the 15 16. Vers Adam's Sin and the Free-gift are opposed in the 18. Vers Adam's Offence and Christ's Righteousness are opposed in the 19. Vers Adam's Disobedience and Christ's Obedience are opposed Hence it appears that what is the free-Free-gift in the 15 and 16. Vers is the Righteousness or Obedience of Christ in the 18. 19. Vers neither indeed can the Parallel stand if any other thing than Christ's Righteousness should be opposed to Adam's sin The other is this these words The Free-gift are put instead of Christ's Righteousness or Obedience this appears in that where the one is mentioned the other is omitted in the 15 16 17. Vers The Free-gift is mentioned but the Righteousness or Obedience of Christ is omitted in the 18 and 19. Vers the Righteousness and Obedience of Christ is mentioned but the Free-gift is omitted Indeed in our Translation we have the Free-gift Vers 18. but not in the Original Hence it appears that they are the same I suppose that in the 18. Vers should be otherwise supplied Thus it appears that the Free-gift is not Pardon Having seen the most material Texts I shall observe one thing more Justification is set forth in such a way in Scripture that it must needs be distinct from Pardon It is set forth so that the Law is established by it Rom. 3.31 but the Law is not established by a Pardon but by a Satisfaction You will say Our Pardon is upon a Satisfaction but if that Satisfaction do not justifie us if it be no Ingredient in our Justification then in our Justification the Law is not established as the Apostle speaks Justification is set forth so that the Righteousness of the Law is fulfilled in us Rom. 8.4 But the Righteousness of the Law is not fulfilled in a Pardon neither is it fulfilled in our imperfect though sincere Obedience The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as Aristotle saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Eth. l. 5. cap. 7. Correctio injuriae Satisfaction for the injured Law but nothing is such but Christ's Righteousness The Apostle in the precedent Verse saith That sin was condemned in the Flesh of Christ and of this there is a double Fruit first Justification The Righteousness of the Law is fulfilled in us that is Christ's Satisfaction becomes imputatively ours and then Sanctification we walk not after the Flesh but after the Spirit This Interpretation harmonizes with the first Verse ther first we have Justification There is no Condemnation to them who are in Christ and then Sanctification We walk not after the Flesh but after the Spirit as therefore Christ's Righteousness is the only thing which satisfies the Law so it is the only justifying matter against it Justification is so set forth that the Law hath its end Thus the Apostle Christ is the end of the Law for Righteousness to the Believer Rom. 10.4 as he is the end of the Law so he is for Righteousness he is not the end of the Law in a procured pardon but in a Satisfaction made and applied Justification therefore consists not in a Pardon but in a Satisfaction applied and made ours by Imputation Thus far out of Scripture Secondly Justification cannot be without a Righteousness that God who judgeth according to truth who is Just and a Justifyer doth not esteem or pronounce us righteous unless we are so a pardon is not our Righteousness for that is God's Act and God's Act though it may make or esteem us righteous is not it self our Righteousness neither is that which a pardon gives viz. an immunity from punishment such an immunity from punishment which is ex merâ indulgentiâ as in the case of a pardoned Malefactor is not such the Malefactor
p. 26. By it God acts like himself and doth all for his own glory p. 27. It imports an hatred of sin and love of holiness in man p. 27 28. In all these respects it was manifest in Christ p. 28 29 c. It was not indecent for God to come in the flesh and dye p. 29 30. The glory of God breaks forth therein p. 31 32. His hatred of sin and design to extirpate it p. 33 34 35. His love to holiness in doing so much to recover it and linking it with salvation p. 35 36 37 38. We should be followers of God therein p. 38 39 c. CHAP. IV. Gods Punitive Justice asserted from Scripture and Nature p. 42 43 44. It was necessary that there should be a Satisfaction for sin p. 45. Rectoral Justice required it p. 46 to 48. Vnless Christs sufferings were satisfactory no good account can be given of them p. 49 50. It 's not enough to say That he was an Example of Patience p. 50. That he confirmed the Covenant p. 51. That Gods immense love was manifested therein or that his Resurrection assured ours ibid. 52 53. Gods Justice appears in that He though of infinite Mercy inflicted those sufferings on Christ p. 54 55. In that Christ the Patient was Man the Son of God an holy innocent One p. 55 to 58. In that the sufferings of Christ were proportionable to the sinning-powers in man p. 59. To the Law p. 60 61. To the sin and sufferings of a World p. 61 62 63. The fruits of his sufferings as to Himself and as to us p. 64 65. The dreadfulness of sin in respect of the sufferings of Christ and the miserable end of impenitent sinners p. 65 66 c. CHAP. V. Gods Love and Mercy manifested in that he stood not upon the old terms as he might and in giving his Son for us p. 70 to 75. The Socinian objection That if God loved us he was not angry answered p. 76 77 78. The earliness and freeness of Gods love in giving his Son p. 79 80 81. The greatness of the gift p. 82. The manner how he was given p. 83 84 85. The persons for whom p. 85 86 87. The evils removed and the good procured by it p. 87 to 91. The excellent Evangelical terms built upon it p. 91. These are easie and sure p. 92 93 94. The Love and Mercy of God an excellent Motive to stir up our love towards God and man p. 95 96 97 c. CHAP. VI. The Power of God manifest in Christ p. 99 100. In his incarnation and conception p. 100 101 102. In his Miracles p. 103 104. These were true in the History p. 104 105 106. True in the nature of Miracles p. 107. They were numerous and great 108 109 110. They were suited to the Evangelical Design p. 111 112. Divine Power manifest in converting the World notwithstanding its deep corruption and the opposition of Potentates and Philosophers to the Gospel p. 113 to 124. The instruments mean that the power might be of God p. 124 125. The Gospel proposes super-rational Mysteries super-moral Virtues super-mundane rewards things so much above us that without a Divine power the proposal would have been fruitless p. 126 127. CHAP. VII The Truth of God manifested in Christ p. 133 134. The Promise of the Messiah p. 134. The Messiah is already come ibid. 135. Jesus is the true Messiah p. 136 137 138. All the other promises are built upon him 138 139. The truth of the Moral Law evidenced in him 139. The Mandatory part proved by his active Obedience The Minatory by his Sufferings p. 139 140 141. He is the substance of the Types and Sacrifices p. 142 143 144. Somewhat in him answers to them p. 144 145. And somewhat in him infinitely transcends them p. 146 to 149. The truth of Worship set forth in him p. 150. He unclogged it from Rituals opened the spiritual mode of it communicates Grace for it reveals the great Reward of Eternal Life p. 150 151 152. CHAP. VIII Gods Providence asserted from Scripture Philosophy and Reason 156 157 158. It hath a double act Conservative and Ordinative p. 159 160 161. Both are manifested in Christ p. 162. It was over Christ over his Genealogy Birth Life Death p. 162 163 164. Over the fruit of his Satisfaction in raising up a Church p. 165. It aimed at a Church directed the means and added the blessing p. 166 167. That opinion That Christ might have dyed and yet there might have been no Church is false p. 168 169 170. All other Providences reduced to those over Christ and the Church p. 171 to 176. Epicurus's Objection against Providence answered p. 176 177 178. Providence over free acts of men asserted and yet Liberty not destroyed p. 178 to 186. The objections touching the afflictions of good men and the event of sin solved p. 186 to 192 The Entity in sinful actions distinct from the Anomy the Order from the Ataxy p. 192 193 c. CHAP. IX The Doctrine of Original sin the great moment of it p. 202 to 205. Adam's sin imputed to us p. 206. The proof of it from Scripture p. 207 to 209. Adam's capacity p. 210. Adam's righteousness ibid. Objections answered p. 211 to 215. Our inherent pravity p. 216. The proof of it from Scripture p. 217 218. The experience of our hearts p. 219 to 221. The actual sins in the world p. 222 223. The doctrine of Original sin manifested from Christs extraordinary Conception p. 224 225. His Headship opposed to Adam's p. 226 from the institution of Baptism p. 227. The wickedness of the Jews in crucifying of Christ p. 228 229. The purchase of Regeneration and Salvation made by Christ p. 230 to 234. A short improvement of this Doctrine p. 235 236 c. CHAP. X. Touching Grace p. 239. The fountain of it Gods love ib. 240. The streams supernatural gifts p. 240 241. The center Heaven p. 242. It s freeness in that all perish not in the fall Original sin meriting death and Christ being a free gift p. 242 to 248. It s freeness in chusing a Church to God p. 248. Election not of all p. 249. No Legislative act but a singling out of some to life in an infallible way and meerly of Grace 250 to 259. It 's freeness in the external and internal Call p. 259 to 262. The distinction between the two Calls 263 to 269. The efficacy of Grace as to the Principles of Faith and other graces with the manner of their production p. 269 to 276. As to actual believing and willing with the proofs of it 276 to 285. As to perseverance in faith and holiness p. 285 286. The Habits of Grace desectible in themselves but not in their dependence p. 287 to 295. CHAP. XI Touching Justification as to the Law p. 325 to 327. Christs Righteousness constitutes us righteous p. 328. A double imputation One to the proper Agent another to those in
be upon our spiritual watch we should set guards within and without that sin may not creep in by the ports of sense nor rise up out of the deep of the heart When a temptation approaches to us we should say as an holy man did Auferte ignem adhuc enim paleas habeo Take away the fire yet I have chaff within If a Jonah fall into a pet against God if a David wallow in adultery and blood if a Peter deny his Lord with a curse What may not we do The remnants of Original sin in us should make us keep a watch over our hearts and ponder the path of our feet Our flesh is an Eve a Tempter within us nay a kind of Devil as an Ancient speaks Nemo sibi de suo palpet quisque sibi Satan est CHAP. X. Chap. 10 Touching Grace The fountain of it Gods love The streams supernatural gifts The center Heaven It s freeness in that all perish not in the fall Original sin meriting death and Christ being a free gift It s freeness in chusing a Church to God Election not of all no Legislative act but a singling out of some to life in an infallible way and meerly of Grace It s freeness in the external and internal Call The distinction between the two Calls The efficacy of Grace as to the Principles of Faith and other graces with the manner of their production as to actual believing and willing with the proofs of it as to perseverance in faith and holiness The Habits of Grace defectible in themselves but not in their dependence HAVING spoken of Original Sin I shall next consider of Grace which heals that deadly wound Grace in the primary notion of it is the Love and Good-will of God towards sinners and in a secondary sense it is those saving-gifts which are derived from that Love These are called Graces because they lye in mans heart as beams of that eternal Grace which is in Gods and tend to that Glory in Heaven which is Grace consummate Gods will goes foremost and works those Graces in mans which make him meet for eternal happiness The fountain of Grace is the free-love of God the streams of it are supernatural gifts in men the center of it is the glory of Heaven These things shew us the true notion of Grace 1. The Fountain of Grace is Gods free Love which moves it self and gratuitously flows out in spiritual blessings these issue out of love and that is a motive to it self Emphatical is that of the Apostle If by grace then it is no more of works otherwise grace is no more grace but if it be of works then it is no more grace otherwise work is no more work Rom. 11.6 It is essential to Grace to be gratuitous unless it be so it loses its nature Upon this account Pelagius that Enemy of Grace but for his counterfeit Recantation had had in the Palestine Council a just Anathema for that saying Gratiam dari secundum merita That Grace was given according to merits or works Aust Hyp. l. 3. When the Pelagians said Quia ego prior volui Deus voluit Because I first willed therefore God willed Saint Austin tells them That they brought in Merit that Grace was then no longer Grace In omni opere sancto saith he prior est voluntas Dei posterior liberi arbitrii In every holy work Gods will is first in order Si vel tantillum boni a Deo non est jam non omnis boni essector est eoque nec Deus Bucer and then mans Without this order Grace cannot be Grace nor God God If he be not the Fountain of all good if the least good start up and anticipate his will he is not as becomes him the origine of all good The Fountain of Grace must therefore be in his Love 2. The streams of it are Supernatural Gifts It 's true natural benefits are in some sense grace but this is not the noted acception of the word in Scripture This acception was but Pallium Pelagianorum the Pelagians cloak under which they hid their Heresie Hence Aust Epist 105. when that question was asked What that Grace was which Pelagians thought was given without any precedent merits Answer was made That it was the humane nature in which we were made for before we were we could not merit a being Thus they confounded Grace and Nature together but the gifts of Grace are above the sphear of Nature and altogether undue to it Indeed in Innocency righteousness was natural to man not that it was a principle of Nature or an emanation from thence but that it was necessary and due to that Integrity which God would set up the human nature in God would make man very good and how that could be without righteousness I know not Moral goodness is that which is proper to a reasonable creature neither can it be wanting but there will be a maim in the creature There was in man an Union of rational powers in which he had communion with Angels and sensitive in which he had communion with Beasts This Union could not be made in a perfect orderly manner unless the sensitive powers being the more ignoble were subjected to the rational being the more excellent faculties that subjection could not be without a righteousness This is the rectitude and harmony of humane nature without it all the parts and powers of the Soul must needs jangle into confusion God would have man to serve and obey him in a perfect manner And how could this be without a principle of holy love Which way should there be actual righteousness without original Without an internal rectitude man could not love God as he ought amore amicitiae with a love of friendship for his own sake and without such a love referring all to God and his glory all mans acts a primo ad ultimum must needs be sin God would set before a man a most glorious end the happiness of the beatifical vision And how should man ever arrive at it without righteousness Or want that righteousness which qualifies for it Such a want would set him below the most contemptible creatures none of which are destitute of that furniture which is requisite for the reaching of their ends In all these respects righteousness was natural and in a sort due unto man in Innocency But after mans fall and forfeiture of Original righteousness saving gifts are altogether supernatural not only as being above the power of nature but as being totally undue to it To the state of Innocency righteousness was in a sense due but to the state of Corruption there was nothing due but wrath 3. The center of it is the Glory of Heaven Grace prepares a Kingdom for Believers Hence God bids them come and inherit the Kingdom prepared for them from the foundation of the World Matt. 25.34 it prepares them for the Kingdom Hence that of the Apostle Giving thanks to the father who
Grace is pure Grace his Love is meerly from himself Hence is that emphatical reduplication The elect whom he hath chosen Matt. 13.20 As if our Saviviour had said in Election there is nothing but pure Election nothing on mans part all is from the good pleasure of God This Truth is notably set forth in our Saviour Christ he was Gods chosen Servant Matt. 12.18 The Lamb fore-ordained 1 Pet. 1.20 And as St. Austin stiles him praeclarissimum lumen praedestinationis gratiae the most famous light of Praedestination and Grace He was as man predestinated to the superlative glory of the Hypostatical Union and that not out of any foreseen holiness in his human nature for all that did flow out of that union but out of meer grace the human nature did not do or merit ought to be advanced into that ineffable excellency neither may any man say Cur non ego Why were not I so advanced Nature is common but Grace is singular Here we have the Prototype and grand Exemplar of Predestination Christ was predestinated to be the Head we are predestinated to be his members He as man was predestinated that by an admirable assumption he should be the natural Son of God We are predestinated that we should be adopted ones He was predestinated to be such without any precedent merits or works We are predestinated to be such without them Hence the Apostle saith That we are predestinated to be conformed to the image of his Son that he might be the first-born among many brethren Rom. 8.29 Both Predestinations were free and in our Predestination there was a kind of imitation of his De bono persever l. 2. c. 24. Hence St. Austin saith Et illum nos Praedestinavit quia in illo ut esset caput nostrum in nobis ut ejus corpus essemus non praecessura merita nostra sed opera sua futura praescivit He predestinated him and us that he should be our Head and we his Body was not from our merit but the work of God It is certain that the Members cannot be above the Head they were not elected to a Beatifical Vision out of foreseen faith and perseverance when the Head was elected to the Hypostatical Union out of meer grace 3. It is of free grace that God calls men There is a double call an External and an Internal one both are of grace 1. The External call is of grace The Gospel is not a debt but a meer gift freely given to men It may be substracted from a Nation for their sins but it is never given to a Nation for their worthiness for all men are unworthy of it When God gives it to some it is not for their dignity when he denies it to others there is always in them a concomitant indignity of it No natural man can be worthy of it It is meerly of Gods good pleasure that the Sun of Righteousness shines in one part of the world and not in another that the Evangelical dew falls in some places and not in others Here the only solution is that of our Saviour Even so Father for so it seemed good in thy sight Mat. 11.26 I know it is here said by some That facienti quod in se est Deus non denegat gratiam To him who doth what he can God denies not grace The promise is Habenti dabitur To him that hath that is rightly useth what he hath more shall be given Upon the right use of naturals the Pagans might have supernaturals The Gospel in such a case should be revealed to them But as Bishop Davenant observes experience confutes this Proferant ab orbe condito vel unius Pagani exemplum saith he Determ f. 236. Let them bring forth if they can the example of one Pagan since the world began who by the right use of naturals attained to Evangelical Grace One would think that such as Socrates and Plato might if any rightly use naturals but they had not the Gospel manifested to them which yet hath been revealed to the poor Americans who comparatively to the other were brutish and barbarous That of the Schools Facienti quod in se est Deus non denegat gratiam Serm printed An. Dom. 1632. fol. 286. is as Bishop Saunderson in his Sermons calleth it the rotten principle and foundation of the whole frame of Arminianism ultimately it resolves all into nature Salvation is resolved into Faith Faith into the Gospel preached that into the use of naturals Nature may now lift up its hand and touch the Crowns of Glory above Grace may fall down to so low a rate as to be earned at the fingers ends of Nature And what is this but pure impure Pelagianism In the Palestine Synod Pelagius but for his counterfeit recantation had had a just anathema for that saying Gratiam dari secundum merita Secundum merita with the Fathers is all one with secundum opera and secundum opera all one with facienti quod in se est The Apostle flatly opposes this opinion He hath called us with an holy calling not according to our works but according to his own purpose and grace 2 Tim. 1.9 The call is not according to works or according to the use of naturals but meerly purely totally from Grace Rightly to use naturals is to live up to the light of nature that tells us that God is the Supreme good and therefore in all reason to be loved with a supreme love We should not give him part of the price but all the mind heart soul spirit and that in pure perfection and who where is the Saint on earth that doth so Their purest acts of love come forth ex laeso principio out of an heart sanctified but in part and in their egress from thence cannot but have a taint or tincture from the indwelling corruption and may we imagine that God should offer the Pagans a Gospel on such terms as no Saint on earth ever arrived at Or that he would have them go about by the way of perfection to enjoy a Gospel of Grace It cannot be But suppose that they may have it upon a sincere love of him Can a Pagan out of natural Principles truly love God May true Love be without Faith the Root or without the Spirit the inspirer of all Graces Or doth the Holy Spirit work in a supernatural way without a Gospel or Ordinances Or if it did doth it work and not effect so much as the first element in Christianity I mean a sense of the want of Grace May the Spirit converse in those unclean places where nothing appears but Error Pride Idolatry Impiety and Wickedness of all sorts It is not reasonable to believe it If Nature could lift up it self to a sincere love of God the Spirit and the Gospel seem to be superfluous thereunto And as for habenti dabitur it speaks not to the point in hand because it speaks not of the use of natural