de leprae dijudicâ—tione agerâ—tur Ostende te inquiens Sacerdoti Beza de Presb. excom p. 17. Why then did Christ sâ—nd them thou wilt say To shew the respect he bare unto Levi's order and to remove that scandal as if he went about to break the Law And why the Lepers above all others of the diseased were sent to Christ Lyra gives two reasons 1. That the Priests might testifie if they were thoroughly healed 1. Quia Sacerdotes debchant iudicare num talip esset verè curatus 2. Quia pro sua emendatione tenebatur offerre sacrificium determinatum in lege Lyr. in Luc. 17. and so against their wills be witnesses of the Lepers curation and Christs miracle 2. To offer for their healing the sacrifice appointed under the Law upon other errands than they were sent and not to confess their sins Remitted then they were unto the Priests for trial and examination not for any acknowledgment not to confess they were Lepers but to make it apparent to the Priests first and by the Priests to the people that they were healed from their Lepry and freed from the danger of infecting It being the Priests office to try such men 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theophylact in Luc. 17. Importuna est illorum allegoria qui legem merè politicam inter ceremonias reponunt Calvin Siste te summo Sacerdoti de publico coetu intelligendus est ut praeteream fieri id solitum magis ad publicam gratiarum actionem vel ad partae sanitatis aut alterius cujuspiam beneficii judicium Iac. Rex Med. in Orat. Dom. p. 63. lat edit and they to undergo the censure How impertinent then is it to infer a Divine institution from a politick ordinance and to make a Law of State to become a typical ceremony especially where the manner and end are so different for in Auricular Confession the sin is acknowledged here the benefit the act there is private here publick there the spiritual lepry is revealed that it may be cured here after the cure that it may be censured there that the Confessed sinner might be restored to the faithful society here that the convicted leper might be exiled there exposed as an example of devotion here expelled upon danger of infection there penitents make their resort to receive the benefit and here the lepers to be thankful for the benefit râ—ceived This shewing therefore unto the Priests shews no such matter as Auricular Confession to be of Divine right and institution We must then see better cards Their best plea is from the words of Christ Receive the holy Ghost Ioh. 20.22 23 whose sins soever ye remit they are remitted unto them and whose sins soever ye retain they are retained Words of a pregnant sense in the Church of Rome as to bring forth at one venter twins two Sacraments of Penance and of Order That Christ therein conferred a power to the Apostles and their successors over sins is a clearer truth than may well be denied but whether such a power over consciences as is exercised in that Church must now be questioned The power it self in remitting and retaining sins we must adjourn to its proper place and must for the present examine whether the words of Christ in themselves considered or by necessary consequent prove auricular confession to be of divine right and institution The Roman Divines insist upon the latter and endeavour by necessary consequent to infer the same thus Such as have fallen into sin after Baptisme are bound by Gods law to repent thereof and seek to be reconciled unto him but none can be truly penitent or reconciled unto God without confession of sin unto the Priest which assumption they further confirm thus Christ hath instituted the Priests judges upon earth with such power Christus instituit Sacerdotes Judices super terram cum ea potestate ut sine ipsorum sententia nemo post Baptismum lapsus reconciliari potest sed nequeunt Sacerdotes judicare nisi peccata cognoscant Bellar. lib. 3. de poenit c. 2. as without their sentence No sinner after his Baptisme can be reconciled but no Judge can pass a sentence upon unknown sins and secret sins cannot be known but by Confession of the party therefore they conclude c. from which discourse thus framed arise in their opinion these two Consectaries 1. That Priests are instituted by divine right to hear and determine of sins brought before them by Confession 2. Comme l'institution des Prestres est de droit divine pour confesser les Pecheurs ausi est bien la confession des Pechez pour estre sait devanâ— ses Juges comme Diâ—u les a ordonâ—é commâ—ndé aux Prestres d'ouir les consessions pardonner les pechez ausi par la mesme ordonnance commandment à il obligé les fidâ—les Penitens à liâ—ur decoâ—urir declarer leurs fautes D. Bess Caresme Tom. 2. p. 724. That sinnâ—rs are injoyned by the same authority to appear at this Tribunal and there to accuse themselves that they may be absolved And as God hath ordained and commanded Priests to hear Confessions and to pardon sins so by the same ordinance and command hath he obliged the believing Penitents to discover and declare their offences No argument more cried up than this and as common with Romes proselytes as water in Tiber and thou hast it good Reader as it is pressed by a Jesuite and a Sorbonist who would be thought to be the onely Scribes and Pharisees of Papal Divinity and mayst observe how all the force hangs but upon the by one wheel moving another that if the least flaw happen in any one the motion that is the conclusion ceaseth Many consequences but how put together by what pins and contignations that 's a secret Persius Satyr ult depinge ubi sistam Inventus Crysippe tui finitor acervi For according to this induction without Confession to a Priest no absolution and without Priestly absolution no remission and without remission from the Priest no reconciliation with God Or thus No reconcilement betwixt God and a sinner except his repentance be sincere no Repentance is sincere till the Priest approve and judge it to be so no Priest can judge of the Sincerity of Repentance without notice of the offence and notice he cannot have without a sinners confession Christus certè nihil horum dicit in sententia illa Joan. 20 de tali judiciario processu nulla syllaba ibi extat Chemnit ex part 2. p. 178. Thus have you this argument up-staires and down-staires And if all these inferences flow so naturally and necessarily from the text how dull-sighted were the Ancient Doctors that could espy none of them Let us tread this Climax 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for if it appear that the Priest is not constituted a Judge in this case then there will lie against him exceptio fori and a sinner may
Ambrose thus Behold sins are forgiven by the holy Ghost Ecce quia per Spiritum Sanctum peccata dònantur homines autem in remissionâ—m peccatorum Ministerium suum exhibent non jus alicujus potâ—statis exercent neque enim in suo sed in Patris Filti Spiritus Sancti peccata dimittuntur isti rogant divinitas donat humanum enim obsequium sed Munisicentia supernae est potestatis Ambr. l. 3. de Spir. S. cap. 19. but men contribute their Ministâ—ry toward the Remission of sin but exercise no right of any power for sins are not remitted in their name but in the name of the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost they supplicate and pray God grants and pardoneth the service is from man but the bounty from an higher power So then the higher power is the key of authority and the humane service is the key of Ministery These several keys were well known to Scotus who writeth thus Judicial authority in censuring heaven to be open or to be opened to any man or not Authoritas judiciaria sententiandi coelum huic aperiendum vel apertum esse tripliciter intelligitur 1. Authoritas simpliciter principalis solius Dei 2. Non Principalis sed praecellens solius Christi quantùm ad duplicem praeeminentiam 1. unam quidem in universalitate causarum judicandarum 2. aliam in firmitate sententiae definitivae utraque praeeminentia potâ—st convenire illi qui omnia merita demerita novit quae sunt causae propter quas coeluÌ„ est aperienduÌ„ vel claudenduÌ„ habet etiaÌ„ voluntateÌ„ inseparaâ—iliter conformem justitiae divinae propter primuÌ„ potest in omnibus causis sententiare quia omnes novit propter secundum potest ejus sententia simpliciter esse firma irrevocabilis quiâ— semper justa Non potest haec Clavis esse in ecclesia Militante qâ—ia nullus in ecclesia novit omnes causas judiciarias nec habet voluntatem immutabiliter justam 3. Particularis quantùm ad causas cognoscendas infirma quantum ad sâ—ntentiam seâ—â—â—am puta quia ipsa fit aliquando revocabilis si quâ—ndo pâ—â—eter legem divinam judical poâ—â—st ergò esse in ecclâ—sia una clavis coâ—â—um aperiâ—ndâ— sc autoriâ—â—s sâ—ntentiandi parâ—iculâ—â—itâ—r non irrevocabâ—liter coelum essâ—â—peâ—tum Scâ—t l. 4. dist 19. Sect. Haec secunda is understood in a threefold sense 1. as the most principal and absolute residing in God onely 2. not as the most principal but a very excellent authority appertaiâ—ing unto Christ by a double preeminence which he hath 1. over all causes as one who knoweth all mens hearts and can judge thereof 2. in the validity of his sentence definitive as ever just and never to be repealed whâ—ch prerogative can onely sort with him who knoweth how well or ill all men have deserved for heaven stands open and shut towards us according as our deserts are as also in regard the will of Châ—ist is and evâ—r was undividedly conform ble to divine justice for the first reason Hâ— may be a Judge in aâ— cauâ—es who know th all things anâ— for the second h enâ—â—nce is firm and iâ—â—vocable bâ—cause alwayes just The militant Church is not capable of this key bâ—cause there is not any member in that Church endowed with so ample iâ— ellectuals as to know alâ— causes nor hath a will so confirmed in justice as therein to be immutable 3. There is a particular authority to hâ—ar causes but weak to give sentenâ—e and is many times revocable as pronouâ—ced besides the lâ—w of God there mâ—y bâ— then in the Church a ceâ—tain key to open heaven that is the authority of sentencing in particular and yet heaven not irrevocably open unto any Thus much Scotus from whose testimony clearly stream these deductions 1. The Ministerial key in the custody of the Church is not so ample and firm as that excellent key which is upon Christs shoulder and those words As my Father sent me so send I you relate to the certainty of the Commission and not to the extent thereof 2. That there is not in the Militant Church therefore not at Rome such a key as can fit all wards or such a Judge as can take cognizance of all causes nor is there that Oecumenicâ—l jurisdictâ—â—n â—ntituling Rome above all and unto all nor do all causes turn upon that Rota 3. That there is no mortal Judge either Ecclesiâ—stical oâ— Civil so confirmed in justice Clavis triplex 1. Authoritatis istam habet solus Dâ—us qui solus dimittit peccata authoritativè 2. Excellentiae qâ—aÌ„ solus homo Christus habâ—t in quâ—ntum â—ssctuÌ„ Sacramâ—â—tâ—rum potâ—st â—â—re siâ—â— Saâ—ramentis 3. Clâ—vis Ministerii istâ—m clavem habent Sacerdotâ—s per quam ligant sâ—â—â—â—nt Raymond sum tract 4. de Poenit. but that he may swerve and deviate from that rule Nullus in Ecclâ—sia saith Scotus In the Church no not one but hath a will subject to change the Pope then that boasteth of the infallibility of his keys either is not of the Church or above it And as this Schoolman hath expressed the differential properties of these keys so a Canonist the several titles and persons to whom they appertain The kâ—y saith be is tripartite 1. of Authority and that is in the hands of God alone who onâ—ly forgiveth sins wâ—th authoâ—ity 2. Of Excellency wh ch the man Christ hath insomuch that he without the Sacraments can confer the effect and benefit of the Sacraments 3. Of the Ministery and this key is in the custody of the Priests by virtue whereof they bind and loose The Church then must rest contented and good cause she hath so to do with this Ministerial key for the first authentical key posuit pater in potestate sua the Father hath put in his own power for the excellent key omnem potestâ—tem dedit filio he hath given that power to his Son and for the Ministerial kâ—y habemus thesaurum istum in vasis fiâ—â—â—ilibus 2 Cor. 4.7 we poor Clergy-men are rich in this treasure thâ— vessels containing the same are earthly but the key is from the Lord and heavenly the excellency of this power is from God the Ministery from us onely And thâ—t we may not be thought â—o accomplish any thing as from our selves 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theophil Com. in 1 Cor. 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Chrys 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but that every one who seeâ—h it may say it is wholly of God niâ—ping withall the false Apostlâ—s who ascribed all unto themselves as Theophilact piously admonishâ—th And indeed we need not be ambitious of further dignities God having highly honoured our Order with this depositum for to whiâ—h of the Angels said he at any time To thee will I give the keys c. and whaâ—soever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven c. Ignem veni mittere in terram
the keys is exercised And thus hast thou Gentle Reader the promise opened and the Contents of this Commission I pass to the performance thereof The Redhibition of the promised keys for without that all promises are but like Ixions cloud flattering our hopes for a season but at last sending us empty away Our God is faithful that hath promised and will never cheat our expectation The promise then was accomplished when Christ said John 10.23 Receive the Holy Ghost whose sins soever ye remit they are remitted unto them and whose sins ye retain they are retained Wherein is a collation of the former power shadowed under the Metaphor of the keys and of binding and loosing which being already sufficiently discussed little remaineth to be spoken save the weighing of the words and the method how they are set and placed And so they are not onely a concession of authority in remitting and retaining sins to certain persons but a ratihabition and confirmation of whatsoever they shall do in the lawful use thereof The Persons therein mentioned are three 1. 1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the person of the sinner or penitent in Quorum whose sins soever 2. of God in remittuntur they are forgiven but by whom 2 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God who in his own right pardons sins 3. 3 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Priest in remiseritis ye my Apostles and Ministers there are then three expressed and where three are expressed three are required we cannot rend off one part of the sentence If you leave out the sinner there is no work for remission and if God remission hath no force and if the Priest no ordinary application It is Gods will and ordinance to proceed by the Churches act and to associate his Ministers and to make them workers together with him they cannot be more excluded forth of this than any part of their function and to exclude them is after a sort to wring the keys out of their hands to whom Christ hath given them John 20.21 and to account of their Ministery in what sins soever they shall remit and of their solemn sending and inspiring as if it were an idle and fruitless ceremony And so the Persons are distinct Now the Confirmation of the Priests power is wonderfully expressed also if we respect first the order the Priests remiseritis standeth first and Gods remittuntur second whom the Minister forgives is seconded with Divine remission and it was Châ—ysostomes observation as I have formerly shewed and explicated the sober sense thâ—reof how forgiveness beginneth upon earth and that heaven followeth after so that whereas in prayer and other parts of Religion it is sicut in coelo sic in terra as in heaven so in earth Heaven being made a precedent for earthly imitation here it is sicut in terra sic in coelo as on earth so in heaven as if earth were a fit Pattern for Heaven to follow which how that Father hath amplified as if heaven should derive from earth authority of judging and God come after his servant giving him leave to judge first and himself after and how the same may not be understood as if God did conform himself and censures to the Priests but confirm rather their just proceedings hath been by me formerly mentioned and not now to be rehearsed I come to the next circumstance which is the time remittuntur they are not shall be remitted no delay instantly upon the conception of these words as Naâ—han to David not transferet but transtulit the Lord hath taken away thy sin Thirdly the manner in setting down the words so as if Christ were contented it should be accounted their act and the Apostles the Agents himself but the Patient suffering it to be done For the Apostles part is delivered in the active 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 imperium obtinâ—o potior superior sum vinco mordicus retineo H. Stephan remiseritis ye shall remit his own in the passive remittuntur they are forgiven and so for the retentive part retinetis whose sins ye retain the Greek signifying to retain with power and force they are retained Fourthly the certainty in the Identity of the word not changing the same for it is not whose sins ye wish pray for or declare to be remitted but whose sins ye remit using no other word in the Apostles office than he useth in his own right It is well observed by Richardus against such as diminish this authority in the hands of the Ministers as if God used them but as Heralds and Criers to declare his pleasure onely Dicunt Apostolicos viros peccata remittendi vel retinendi potestatem non habere cum Dominus hoc dicat dicunt eos tantummodo habere potestatem utrumque ostendendi cum Dominus hoc non dicat Quorum remiseritis inquit peccata non quorum remissa ostenderitis remittuntur eis Rich. de Clavibus cap. 11. Such men say the Apostolical men have not power to remit and retain sins whereas the Lord saith they have and say withall they have onely power to shew forth the same whereas the Lord saith not so Whose sins soever ye remit saith he not whose sins ye shew or declare to be remitted are remitted unto them The words then of our Commission we retain precisely not challenging more than the Lord hath given us which were presumption nor abridging his bounty which were in us either supineness or ingratitude And these words solemnly pronounced by the Bishop are still used and so ever have been are still accounted and so ever have been the very form and soul of Priestly order and institution thereby those Reverend persons exercise that branch of their supereminent power in conferring the holy orders of Priesthood in begetting Fathers not Children Masters 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiphan haer 75. pag. 908. not Scholars in the Church as Epiphanius rightly and this is the word that spiritual seed whereby that Paternity is conceived and brought forth And is it not a wonder that any son of this Mother any member of this Church should envy this power or sleight this gift seeing the Ministers receive not this benefit to their own use put not this Candle under a bushel lock not up this treasure within their own coffers But like the good Scribe bring forth new and old as occasion serveth and like the faithful Apostle That which they received of the Lord deliver they unto you Who then is Paul or who is Apollo 1 Cor. 3.5 Veâ—se 9. but Ministers by whom ye believed You the people are Gods husbandry we the Clergie are labourers together with Gâ—d And are you troubled at the seed we sow or the implements of husbandry we use to make you a fruitfull field ye are the Lords building and we his Builders think you much of our skill and indeavours that you may be edified Therefore whether Paul Verse 22. or Apollos or Cephas or the
world or life or death or things present or things to come all are yours all ye are Christs and Christ is Gods The greater the tâ—ust reposed in us is the greater is your hope and our account The Charge is ours but the commodity is yours for whose good we are enfeoffed with this power then for any man to slight or disparage the gift will argue either a disesteem of the thing it self or despair to reap any benefit from it rather give God the glory that hath given such power unto men and remember for whose sakes it was given I shall make up this part with the saying of Theophylact Behold with me the dignity of Priests 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theoph. in Joan 20. pag. 137. how God-like it is for to God iâ— belâ—ngeth to forgive sins they are then to be honoured as from God Let them be otherwise worthlâ—ss what then They are Ministers of Divine graces Grace worketh by them as it spake by the mouth of Balaams ass for our unworthiness doth not frustrate or hinder grace seeing then grace comes by Priests in that respect let them be honoured Novatian Heresie By this that hath been said it appeareth how much the Church was wronged by Novatus a Bishop in Africk and Novatian a Priest of Rome for those two laid their heads together in the conception of that desperate heresie Spoiling her of this Ministerial power in reconciling Penitents lapsed after baptisme into notorious offences though their repentance were never so sound or soundly demonstrated An opinion begotten upon the severity of those Primitive times wherein the Fathers of the Church however they might believe that the Church had warrant to receive such sinners yet they abstained from the use thereof Non quòd lapsos ad communionem Ecclesiasticam pacem admittendos negarent sed quod nullam ad eos reconciliandos condonandáque delicta jus in Ecclesia esse persidiosè crudeliter asserverarent quod Clavium potestatem Sacerdotibus detraherent D. Petav. Animadvers in Epiphan haer 59. p. 226 227. leaving them to their grief and Gods mercy nor were those Hereticks proscribed by the Church as Petavius informeth us for denying lapsed sinners to be admitted to the communion again but for cruelly and despâ—tefully maintaining that the Church had no right nor authority to râ—concile them Aiunt Novatiani se Domino dâ—ferre reverentiam cui soli remittendorum criminum potestatem reservent immo nulli majorem injuriam faciunt quà m qui ejus volunt mandata rescindere nam cùm ipse in Evangelio suo dixerit Dominus Jesus Accipite c. Quis est ergo qui magis honorat utrum qui mandatis obtemperat an qui resistit Ecclesia in utroque servat obedientiam ut peccatum alliget relaxet haeresis in altero immitis in altero inobediens vult ligare quod non resolvat non vult solvere quod ligavit Ambr. l. 1. de Poen c. 2. and to pardon their offences and upon the point wrested from her Priests the power of the keys The Novatians saith Ambrose tell us how they ascribe this reverence to God as to reserve unto him onely the power of pardoning offences whereas in truth none do him greater wrong than those that go about to repeal his commandments seeing the Lord Jesus himself in the Gospâ—l hath said Receive the Holy Ghost whose sins soever ye remit c. who is it therefore that honoureth him most whether the man that obeyeth or he that opposeth his commandments the Church in both preserves her â—bâ—dience as well in binding as in loosing sin But this heresie in that is cruel in this disobedient and will bind that it may not loose and will not loose what it hath bound And in this way the Latin Fathers set down this heresie but the Greek I know not how truly charge them further as affirming them to cut off such sinners not onely from the society of the Church without hope of reconcilement but from salvation without hope of mercy that those who denied Christ could not obtain mercy So Theophylact. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theodoret. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiphan adv haer l. 2. tom 1. haer 59. And Epiphanius Novatus brâ—ached this heresie saying there was no salvation but one repentance and he that fell after Baptisme could never after be able to obtain mercy But whether they called the mercy of God into question as they did the reconciliation of the Church may be doubted and it may well be whether Tertullian came home to them in this opinion or no in whom we read Christianos cum his non misceri eos neque congregare neque participare cum Christianis Tertul. contr Nat. l. 1. c. 5. That Christians should not be mingled with such grievous sinners who were to have neither right nor fellowship with Christians following the sharp discipline of the timâ—s wherein such lapsed sinners were made over unto God so Tertulliani temporum disciplina ità firmè observavit Ut ii Deo committerentur i. e. ut post longam quamlibet diuque tractam poenitentiam pacem ab Ecclesia impetrare non possint neque eorum ratio haberetur verùm in perpetuum Ecclesiâ absolutione vel in morte privarentur Gottofredi Notae ad Tert. contr Nationes as after a long and tedious repentance they could not be admitted to be at peace with the Church without any respect unto thâ—m at all but were for ever and at their death also excluded from the Church and absolution saith that learned Civilian who hath of late enriched the Church with another piece of Tertullian and pieced the same with his learned Notes Cyprian being censured for the breach of this discipline and dispensing Ut his qui libellis conscientiam suam maculaverint vel nefanda sacrificia commiserint laxandam pacem putaverim Cyprian Epist ad Anton. and admitting of such who had fallen in persecution and through frailty had incensed unto Idols made his apology for his practice herein The Church in his dayes and the dayes following not onely claimed the power but acted and used the same towards Penitent sinners of all sorts reaching the hand of absolution to such as devoutly craved the same For God maketh no distinction saith Ambrose who hath promised his mercy unto all Deus distinctionem non facit qui misericordiam suam promisit omnibus relaxandi licentiam Sacerdotibus suis sine ulla exceptione concessit sed qui culpam exaggeraverit exaggeret etiam poenitentiam majora enim crimina majoribus abluuntur fletibus Ambr. l. 1. de Poen c. 5. and hath granted to his Priests licence to absolve without any exception but he that hath aggravated in offending let him increase his sorrow for greater sins are to be washed with larger tears whereby we are given to understand that sins in themselves unlike are alike in pardon and if a Penitent distinguish
the kingdome of heaven against men by their wicked and adulterine expositions of the Law folding up the prophesies lest the people should read Christ therein and believe maliciously detaining the key of knowledge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theophyl in Luc. 11. and not opening the Gates of the Law that is the obscurity thereof as Theophylact noteth So the good Scribes praise in the Gospel is to open to his hearers by preaching of the word the door of faith Acts 14.26 unlocking as it were the kingdome of heaven unto them by giving knowledge of salvation unto his people by the remission of sins Luke 1.77 79. to give light unto them that sit in darkness and in the shadâ—w of death and to guide our feet into the wâ—y of peace for to whom doctrine and instruction is committed that man hath the key of knowledge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theophyl suprà saith Theophylact. The key of knowledge is the authority of teaching saith Lyra by which the true understanding lying inwardly hid ought to be opened Clavis Scientiae est authoritas docendi per quam dâ—bet intellectus latens interiùs aperiri ipsi è contrario claudebant perversè inâ—erpretando Lyra in Luc. 11. and they on the contrary did shut it up by perverse interpretation Upon the point then to shut up the kingdome of heaven is to handle the word of God deceitfully or not at all and Christs woe unto you Lawyers which take away the key of knowledge is equivalent with Saint Pauls woe unto me if I preach not the Gospel And this key is truly turned when the word is duly applied 2. Prayer The next means ordained by God for procuring remission of sins and wherein the Minister doth exercise his function is Prayer Jam. 5.14 15. Is any sick amongst you saith Saint James let him call for the Eldeâ—s of the Church and let them pray over him anointing him with oyl in the Name of the Lord. And the prayer of faith shall save the sick and the Lord shall raise him up and if he have committed sins they shall be forgiven him And as the chains fell off from Peters hands upon the prayers and intercessions of the Church Acts 12.6 so the Angel of the Covenant toucheth a Penitents soul and the bonds of sin are released upon the prayers of the Presbyters Saint Chrysostome informes us that Priests do not onely exercise this power of forgiveness of sins when they beget us again in Baptisme 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrysost 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tom 6. pag. 17. but after the administration thereof that power of remitting sins continueth in them and for proof of that continuance he alleageth that former passage of Saint James and thereupon inferreth that Priests forgive sins not by teaching and admonishing onely but by helping us with their prayers Aug. de Bapt. contr Donat. l. 3. c. 17 18. And Saint Augustine maketh this one special way whereby the power of the keys is exercised in remitting sins and to this end he adviseth offenders to do publick Penance that the Church may pray for them Agite-poenitentiam qualis agitur in Ecclesia ut oret pro vobis Ecclesia Aug. hom 49. ex 50. and impart the benefit of absolution unto them and that which hath already been alleged from Leo Qui pro delictis Poenitentium precator accedit Leo in fine Epist 80. ad Episcop Campan that confession of sin is to be tendred to the Priest who cometh in as an intreater for the sins of the Penitent And that of Ambrose but lately quoted Isti rogant Divinitas donat humanum enim est obsequium sed munisicentia supernae est potestatis Ambr. de S. Spiritu l. 3. 19. The Priests intreat but the Deity bestoweth the service is from man but the bounty from an higher power And his reason is sound because it is the Holy Ghost onely that forgiveth sins by their function and none can send the Holy Ghost but God and stand he doth not at the Priests command but intreaty In the Schools two not of the meanest rank Alexander Halensis and Bonaventure are clear of opinion Alex. Hal. in sum part 4. Qu. 21. memb 1. that the power of the keys extendeth to remission of sins by way of intercession onely and deprecation not by imparting any immediate absolution whereof the later giveth reasons why the form thereof is deprecative and indicative Secundum quod ascendit habet se per modum inferioris supplicantis secundum quod descendit per modum superioris judicantis secundum primum modum potest gratiam impetrare ad hoc est idoneus secundum posteriorum modum potest Ecclesiae reconciliaâ—e ideò in signum hujus in forma absolutionis praemittitur oratio per modum deprecativum subjungitur absolutio per modum indicativum deprecatio grâ—tiam impetrat absolutio gratiam supponâ—t Bonav l. 4. d. 18. art 2. Qu. 1. for that by the former he looketh upward and ascendeth unto God by prayer and as a suppliant obtaineth grace and pardon by the second he reconcileth to the Church and for a sign and demonstration hereof to the form of absolution there is prayer premised by way of request then followeth the absolution it self by way of recognition the prayer begging for grace and the absolution supposing the same to be obtained And the ancient method or form of Divine Service observed in the absolving of a person excommunicate was first to repeat a Psalme or say the Lords Prayer Primò dicat aliquem Psalmum seu orationem Dominicam secundò dicat Salvum fac servum tuum Deus meus sperantem in te Vâ—rs Domine exaudi oâ—ationem meam Râ—sp Et Clamor meus ad te veniat Vers Dominus vobiscum Râ—sp Et cum Spiritu tuo Oratio Deus cui proprium est misereri semper parcere suscipe deprecationem nostram ut hunc famulum tuum quem excommunicationis catena constringit miseratio tuae pietatis absolvat per Christum Dominum nostrum Dein dicat Ego te absolvo c. Sum. Angel verb. absolutio 3. 1. secondly O Lord save thy servant which putteth his trust in thee Vers O Lord hear my prayer Ans And let my cry come unto thee Vers The Lord be with you Ans And with thy spirit The Prayer O God whose property is ever to have mercy and to forgive receive our humble petition that this thy servant whom the chain of excommunication bindeth the pitifulness of thy great mercy may absolve through Christ our Lord. Then say I absolve thee from the bond of excommunication in the name of the Father c. And accordingly in the new as well as ancient rituals of the Latin Church the form of absolution is expressed in the third person deprecatively as if it proceeded from God and not indicatively in the first person as if
judgment seats But if no disease be more deadly than sin and no law hath so powerful an avenger as God it will follow no ordinance to be more acceptable and necessary than that which reconciles the lost favour of God unto the transgressors of his laws Thou then whosoever thou art that disesteemâ—st the power of God in the Ministery of his Priests be first without sin before thou cast the first stone against it and except thou beest exempted from common infirmities vâ—lifie not these Physicians It is not the least of Satans subtilties to weaken this ordinance in many mens estimations as no useful institution of God but an usurpation of the Prelates serving more to establish their tyrannie over the peoples consciences than to quiet and pacifie them and as the Priests are too supercilious to prescribe so the people may be too superstitious to observe thus the Serpent by degrees hath brought this laudable practice first out of credit and next out of use for the most part and so highly that by many transported with impudence the Priest is questioned as Moses was by the Hebrew Exod. 2.14 Quis te constituit Judicem Who hath made thee a Pâ—ince and Judge over us though his intents be onely to part the fray betwâ—xt God and the sinner and set them at peace as Moses betwixt his countrey-men And as Korah and his complices said to Moseâ— and Aaron Ye take too much upon you Numb 16.3 seeing all the congregation is holy and the Lord amongst them So is the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy traduced by our modern Schismaticks for Vsurpation Matth. 12. â—4 for Tyrannie for Lording it over Gods inheritance Are not all the Brethren Saints why do you Prelates then lift up your selves above them Saints let them be is there not principality amongst Saints as well as amongst Devils But are not all Gods people a royal Priesthood why do you Priests arrogate unto you any prerogative above your fellows to such tender ears the very name of absolution is odious and the keys themselves disliked because born cross-wise at Rome lest therefore such Monsieurs les Greffiers question us as the Scribes did our Saviour By what authority doest thou these things We will clear the coasts and evidence these disquisitions 1. what power is given unto the Priest in the matter of sin and therein whence this commission issueâ—h and to whom it is directed 2. what are the actâ— and exercises thereof and wherewithall the same is executed 3. then of the properties thereof whether the Priests sentence be absoluâ—e and infallible and whether Ministerial and judicial 4. and lastly the abuses shall be parallel'd with the positive truth and thereby measured and discerned The first grant of this power unto man Of the Power of the keys Matth. 16.19 is the promise of Christ made unto Peter under the meâ—aphor of the keys saying I will give unto thee the keys of the Kinâ—dâ—m of heaven and whatsoevâ—r thou stalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven and whatsoever thou shalt lâ—ose on earth shall be lâ—osed iâ— heaven a power of great latitude and extent equivalent in the opinion of Saint Chrysostome as to give the places on his right and left hand in his kingdome 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrys in Matth. 16. Tom. 2. pag. 344. whereupon that Father questioneth but answereth himself how shall Christ give the power of the keys that hath not in his hands the placing of the seats thereby also demonstrating himself to be God in conferring that property power of remitting sins which appertaineth to God onely These termes are to be opened 1. what the keys mean 2. next how they are to be used under these words of binding and loosing 3. in the third place about what they are imployed the object quicquid whatsoever 4. and lastly by whom Keys Tibi Dabo I will give unto thee For the first The holy Ghost compareth a sinners case to the estate of a person imprisoned the very termes of keys of opening and shutting seem to have relation as it were to the prison gate and the termes of binding and loosing as it were to the fetters and bonds as if sin were a prison and the case of sinners like theirs that are shut up whereupon the power given unto Christ as man Luke 4.18 was to preach 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 remission or deliverance to captives And keys imply a faculty to that person to whose custody they are committed as when Eliakim was invested inâ—o Shebnahs place Esay 22.22 it is said I will lay the key of David upon his shoulder which words seem to be lent unto the Apostle and by him applied unto our Saviour Revel 3.7 These things saith he that is holy that is true he that hath the key of David he that openeth and ro man shutteth that shutteth and no man openeth with this difference the word house omitted in the latter Discrimon est quod illud videtur inferioris Ministri puta 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 idque tantùm in familia Davidis hoc supremi Gubernatoris atque quidem totius râ—gni Brightman Apocalyps cap. 3. 7. and that advisedly to distinguish betwixt the Type and the Truth Eliakim and Christ in Him resideth regal power and despotical in Eliakim Ministerial and Oeconomical onely as steward of Davids house for that room he sustained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aben Ezra Thesaurarius super domum regalem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 4 1. 1. Clavis authoritatis solius Dei 2. Clavis excellentiae solius Christi as appeareth 2 King 18. By the delivering then of this key Peter was made not a Lord over Gods inheritance but a steward of the mysteries of God for our case was thus As Adam was exiled and shut out of Paradise so are sinners from heaven and as Paradise was shut against him so was heaven against them also sin being the embargo betwixt us and heaven Now what key shall sinners find to open heaven gate God hath a commanding key who onely hath authority to forgive sin against whom it is committed and so often as a sinner is pardoned so often is heaven opened this key God keeps to himself 2. Christ hath an excellent key which openeth where no man shutteâ—h for by his merits hath this Angel of the Covenant like Peters Angel loosed our bands Acts 12.7 and set open the Prison doors enlarging the Captives and not them onely but the Palace doors Heb. 10.19 Sanguis Christi clavis Paradisi Tert. for by the bloud of Jesus we have boldness to enter into the holiest and elegantly it was said by Tertullian his bloud is the key of Paradise 3. The Apostles had an Oeconomical key as stewards in the Lords house for in Princes Courts the key is the ensign of that Office because unto their trust is committed the Ministery of Reconciliation 3. Clavis Ministerii of this key Saint
potestas judicandi non est justitia immo potest esse sine justitia ita potestas vel authoritas cognoscendi in aliqua causa potest esse sine cognitione aliqua Scot. lib. 4. dist 19. whereby they have power to make inquisition into and examine the case or the Penitent as a man that standeth by may know as much Law as he that sitteth upon the Bench although he hath not a Commission to examin the truth of a cause then in question according to his skill as the Judge hath for saith Scotus that authority whereby the Judge possesseth himself with the true information of the matter depending although it may require skill and discretion to manage the same aright even as the key of power requireth justice in the right use thereof notwithstanding as the power to judge is distinguish d from Justice and may be found where there is no justice as in Pilat so the power and authority to take cognizance of a cause may ofttimes be without any discretion or science at all as in Festus and Felix Saint Pauls Judges the gift then of knowledge and understanding is not the key but the guide thereof and the authority rightly placed when a man of understanding is in place 2. Clavis Potestatis The Second is the Authority of censuring or the key of power which we call the power of absolution consisting in the solemn denunciation of the Sentence for the former key which investeth the Priest with authority to discern Claves sunt discernendi scientia potentia judicandi i. e. solvendi ligandi usus harum Clavium 1. discernere ligandos solvendos 2. dâ—in ligare solvere Magistr l. 4. dist 18. and examine between leprosie and leprosie is but preparatory maturing onely and ripening the sinners case for sentence Judicium sumitur prout significat actum Judicis ut Judex est jus decit i. e. juridicam sententiam pronunciat Apol. pro Jure Princip pag. 173 174. final determination being the scope thereof wherein the Priest after a full notice and examination of the sinners case and comparing the same with the law of God the rule to direct his hand and key judgeth according to that law and pronounceth the sentence judicial I say as delegated from God whose Commissioner for such causes he is and proceedeth not as a Witness to give in Evidence nor as a Herauld or Crier or Pâ—rsevant to make intimation of the Magistrates decree as a Messenger onely but as a Judge though subalternate clothed with authority from Christ and Christ from his Father to give the sentence The Father saith Chrysostome hath given all power unto the â—on and I see thâ—t they 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrys 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tom. 6. p. 16. the Priests to have bâ—en made partakers of all that power by the Son for witnesses discover and declare the fact and Judges proceed aâ—cording to their evidence for example whether such a Murder were committed or no the eye-witnesses are the evidence as present and observing the fact although the Magâ—strate denounce the sentence and punishment The Penitent then becomes a selfe-accuser and witness and the Priest turns the key according to Gods law whose Deputy and Steward in that case he is Nor doth this power to be a Judge contradict his office as a Minister for as Magistrates are the (a) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 13.4 Ministerâ— of God and bear not the sword in vâ—in so are Ministers the Magistrates of God and bear not the keys in vain But of this there will be occasion to say something in the exercise of this power whether it be judicial or no. Onely thus as the Magistrate is a temporal M n ster and the end of his power the preservation of publick peace and tranquility so is the Minister a Spiritual Magistrate to procure the salvation of souls and the enlargement of Gods kingdome and as the Magistrates sword is Terrestrial punishing evil doers and protecting such as do well so is the Ministers key Celestial binding the obstinate and loosing penitent offenders And it goeth well with Church and State when the Ecclesiastical Ministery and Civil government keep the bounds God hath set them and in truth the mutual incroachments and confusions of these two powers have been the occasions of all the alterations and combustions in Christendome For as when the roof of the Temple rent in sunder not long after followed the ruine of the Temple it self So if these two principal beams and Top-rafters the Prince and the Priest reâ—t asunder the whole frame of Christian religion will be shaken The abuse of the keys hath occasioneâ— the Câ—vâ—l Magistrate to abridg in some cases the lawful use thereof â—nâ— when the Church men began to use them like swords the Sword men seized upon them as belonging to their Regiment Know tâ—en O Priest what the inscription is that is ingraven upon thy k yâ— They are the keys of the kingdome of heaven and remember that he who gave the keys to Peter said unto the same man put up thy sword into thy sheath And let the Magistrate be afraid to draw too near unto this holy ground to handle the Câ—nser and approach unto the Altar or to Usurp upon the true function of the keys 2 Chro. 26.16 which appertain not unto them but unâ—o the Priests that are consecrated lest they participate in the judgment and leprosie of Vzziah As the Spiritual keys are of the kingdome of heaven because they open and shut the same to different offenders Revel 1.18 so are they of Death and Hell too from the dire effects thereof to such as are impenitent for Hell hath gates as well as Heaven and the same key that shutteth Heaven gates openeth Hell and where the gates of heaven are opâ—ned those of hell are shut Now heaven is opened and hell shut when a sinner is loosed and absolved in like manner hell is opened aâ—d heaven shut when a sinner is bound and his sins retained The next thing we are to consider Whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth c. It had beâ—n more correspondent to the Metaphor and use of the keys to have used the termes of opâ—ning and shutting 2 Of Absolution â—ligation as did Esaias the Prophet and John the Dâ—vine but the Holy Ghost hath chosen to express this power under the words of binding and loosing Esay 22.22 Rev. 3.7 to signifie the miserable â—state of such to whom heaven is shut up as remaining bound with the cords of their own sins Nempè ut intelligamus quam misera sit conditio illorum quiâ—â—s Coelum clauditur manent enim ol stricti peccatorum vinculis Contrà verò quà m bâ—ati sunt illi quibus apertum est coelum qui scilicet à filio Dei liberati sunt sint ipsius cohaeredes Beza Annot. in Matth. 16. and contrariwise the blessed condition of those to
the Lepers was Gods doing the Priest serving onely to discern what God hath already done and to pronounce the same Richardus herein saith well though not alwayes well Distinguamus diligenter quid Dominus faciat per sâ—mâ—tipsum quid faciat per Ministrum suum per semetipsum resuscitat mortuum per Ministros solvit ligatum per sâ—mâ—t ipsum mundat Leprosum ministâ—rio Sacâ—rdâ—tis reducit eâ— etum Mortuum resusciâ—â—râ— Ieprosum mundar ad idem videtur resâ—â—â—re nam utrobique solvitur obligatio culpa sed vinctum solvere vel rejectum educere ad id m nihilominus vidâ—tur respicere quoniam utrobique sequitur obligatio paenae Leprosus mundatur quando pervâ—rsus quisque pravitatis suae sordiâ—us divinitùs exuitur Mortuus resuscitatuâ— quando peccato captivatus ad benè vivendum divinitus animatur Past emundationem leprae Sacerdotali officio interveniâ—â—â—â— ejectus priùs in sua reducitur instâ—tis involutus à Domini Ministris abirâ— ad sua redire permittitur quando per absolutionem consilium Sacerdotis ad vitae novitatem reformatur Rich. de Clavibus cap. 18. We are diligently to distinguish what God doth by himself and what he doth by his Minister by himself he raised the dead by his Ministerâ— he loosed him that was bound by himself he cleansed the Leper by the Ministery of the Priests her stored him that was cast out To raiâ—e the dead and to cleanse the Leper have respect unto one and the same thing for in them both the obligation of sin is loosed so also to loose him that was bound and to restore him that was cast forth seem to be the same for in both there followeth an obligation of punishment The Leper is cleansed when a sinner is by God stripped forth of the filth of sin The dead is raised when he that was in bondage unto sin is quickned by God to lead a good life After the cleansing of the Leprosie the Priests office intervening he that was formerly cast forth is restored and he that was bound with grave-clothes and loosed by the Lords Ministers is permitted to depart and return unto his own when through the absolution and counsel of the Priest he is reformed unto newness of life Thus much Richardus where we plainly see that absolution in the hands of a Priest is but an infranchising not a reviving of a dead sinner a reconciling and not a cleansing of a leprous Penitent 3. Spiritually The third way of absolution is which a Penitent in some select cases by the testimony of the Holy Ghost pronounceth it upon himself for remission of sins is the proper work of Gods Spirit therefore Christ endowed his Disciples first with the Holy Ghost and then with the power of remission and retention Hereupon saith Ambrose He that cannot absolve from sin Quâ— solvere non potest peccatum non habet Spiâ—itum Sanctum munus Spiritûs Sâ—nctii est officium Sacerdotis jus autâ—m Spiritús Sancti in solvâ—ndis ligâ—ndisque criminibus est Ambros l. 1. de Poen c. 4. hath not the Holy Ghost the charge of the Holy Ghost is the Priests office and the right of the Holy Ghost is in binding and loosing offences Wherein observe that Fathers distinction inter Spiritus Sancti munus jus Absolution from the Priest to a penitent is munus Spiâ—itûs Sancti the charge and office of the Holy Ghost whereas the absolution from a penitent to himself is jus Spiritûs Sancti that right whereby the Holy Ghost testifieth unto his conscience that his sins are forgiven Origen after his manner feeding upon an Allegory understandeth by the gates of hell sins Portae inferorum nominari possunt juxta speciâ—s peccatorum Sion autem portae intâ—lliguntur contrariae portis mortis ut mortis quidem porta sit intemperantia porta verò Sion temporantia arbitror quòd pro uâ—â—quâ—qâ—e virtute cognitionis aliqua sapientiae mâ—stâ—â—â—â—â—spondâ—ntia gâ—neri viâ—tutis aperiuâ—tur ei qui secundum virâ—utem vixerit Servâ—torâ— dâ—nte iâ—â— qui suâ—â—rari non possunt à portis insâ—rorum totidem claves quot sunt virtutes Origen and maketh every several vice a several gate and the gates of the daughter of Sion he makes the contrary virtues 〈◊〉 intâ—mperance is a gate of hell temperance of Siâ—n c. and by the keys he will have meant the piâ—us practice of each virtue So by the keys of Righteousness and temperance are opened the gatâ—s of Righteousness and temperance Our Saviour conferring saith he upon such against whom the gates of hell prevail not so many keys as there are virtues According to this Father a man by sinning shuts heaven gate and sets hell gate open for his soul and contrarywise by repenting and practising such virtues as are opposite to his former vices he shuts the gates of hell and sets open for him those of heaven To the same purpose saith Saint Chrysostome if that Homily be his whereof his learned publisher doubteth He hath given unto thee the power of binding and loosing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrys hom super Quaecunque c. tom 7. pag. 268. thou hast bound thy self with the chain of the love of wâ—alth loose thy self by an injunction of the love of poverty thou hast bound thy self with the furious desires of pleasures loose thy self with temperance thou hast bound thy self with the misbelief of Eunomius loose thy self with the religi us embracing of the right faith Thus God hath erected a Tribunal in the heart of man his Conscience arraigneth him upon Gods law as a Transgressor and guiâ—ty of the breach thereof but upon his confession and detestation of the fact Justificatio in S. Scriptura actâ—onem quandam forensem notâ—t qualis â—st absolutio aut absolutionis pronuntiatio D. Twiss de Permis lib. 2. part 2. p. 434. the holy Spirit recreates and comforts him with the sweet voice and promises of the Gospel that his sins for Christ's sake are forgiven kindling in his heart faith whereby he is justified and at peace with God For what else is the justificatâ—on of a sinner but a pronouncing of his absolution and this I call the inward and Spiritual Absolution And this is all our Church guided with Gods word and invested with this power teacheth concerning absolution the Rhemists confessing the use thereof in our Church Rhemist Annotat in Joan. 20. vers 23. That the English Protestants in their order of visiting the sick their Ministers acknowledge and challenge the same using a formal absolution according to the Churches order after the special confession of the party and for which it was even her happiness to have been accused by Schâ—smaticks being justified by the then gracious and learned Defender of her faith for when Arch-Bishop Whitgift read unto King James the Confession in the beginning of the Communion-book and the absolution following it His Highness perused them both in the book it self
it proceeded from the Priest himself thus Almighty God be mercifull unto thee and forgive thee all thy sins past Miscreatur tui omnipotens Deus dimittat tibi omnia peccâ—ta tua praeterita praesentia futura quae commisisti coram eo Sanctis ejus quae confessus es vel per aliquam negligentiam seu oblivionem vel malevolentâ—am abscondisti liberet te Deus ab omni malo hic in futuro conservet confirmet te semper in omni opere bono perducat te Christus Filius Dei vivi ad vitam sine fine manentem Consitentium Cerem antâ—q Colon. 1530. present and to come which thou hast committed before him and his Saints which thou hast confessed or by some negligence or evil will hast concealed God deliver thee from all evil here and hereafter preserve and confirm thee alwayes in every good work and Christ the Son of the living God bring thee to the life which remaineth world without end After this form are conceived all the Absolutions prescribed for use in the Liturgy of our Church as savouring of more modesty and less supercâ—tousness and that none of Gods glory might be thought to cleave unto the Ministers fingers for instance In the general absolution upon the confession of sin at the entrance of Gods worship Forms of Absolution in the Church of England He pardoneth and absolveth all such as truly repent them of their sins and uâ—feignedly believe his holy Gospel wherefore we beseech him to grant us true repentance c. And after a general confession of sins premised by the Communicants the Minister or Bishâ—p if present turning himself unto the people saith Almighty God our heavenly Fâ—ther who for his great mercy hath promised forgiveness of sins to all such which with earnest repentance and true faith turn unto him have mercy upon you pardon and forgive you all your sins strengthen and confirm you c. And at the visitation of the sick the sick party having confessed any wâ—ighty matter wherewith his conscience is troubled the Priest absolveth him after this sort Our Lord Jesus Christ who hath left power to his Church to absolve all sinners which truly repent and bâ—lieve on him of his great mercy forgive thee thine offences and by his authority committed unto me I absolve thee from all thy sins in the Name of the Father c. By all of which it is evident how much the Church attributeth to prayer and Divine authority in this ministration A third Ordinance whereby the Minister remitteth sins 3. By the Sacraments is in dispensing the mysteries of God the holy Sacraments and these added to the word of God render the pardon under seal Sacramenta non excludimus quae verbo tanquam sigillo regio appendi solent Masar de Minister Anglic. l. 5. c. 10. pag. 635. Acts 1.38 Acts 22 16. â—ur Baptizatis si per hominem peccata dimitti non licet in Baptismo utique remissio peccatorum omâ—ium est Quid interest utrum per poenitentiam an per Lavacrum hoc jus sibi datum sacerdotes vâ—ndicent unum in utroque M nistâ—rium est Ambr. l. 1. de Poen c. 7. the more to confirm and quiet a distracted Conscience for of Baptisme it is evident Repent saith Peter and be baptized every one of you in the Name of the Jesus Christ for the remission of sins And now why tarriest thou saith Ananias unto Paul arise and be baptized and wash away thy sins And the Nicene Creed I believe one Baptisme for the remission of sins Upon which ground Saint Ambrose questioned the Novatians that baptized and yet acknowledged no power in the Church to remit sins Why baptize you if sins may not lawfully by man be forgiven assuredly in Baptism there is a pardon for all offences What difference is there whether Priests claim this power as given unto them in the reconciling of Penitents or in the washing of Baptisme The Ministery in both bâ—ing one and the same So for the holy Eucharist that lively mirror of our Saviours passion wherein Christ is crucified 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before our eyes wherein the Bread is broken and delivered in token that his body was broken and his merits given unto us Matth. 26.28 wherein the Bloud of the new Testament is shed 〈◊〉 many for the remission of sins Now the virtue annexed to these Blessed Sacraments which are seals of the Promises of the Gospel as the Censures are of the threats is from God whose Sacraments they are and not from man who is but the Minister thereof From his side flowed the bloud and water and because both rise from that spring they have both this power Herein is no power for man where the grace of the Divine bounty prevaileth saith Ambrose It is one thing to baptize by the way of Ministery Nulla in his hominis potestas est ubi divini munâ—ris gratia viget Ambr. suprà Aliud â—st baptizare per Ministerium aliud per potestatâ—m sibi tenuit Dominus potestatem baptizandi servis Ministerium dedit Aug. tract 5. in Joan. and another thing by the way of power saith the Oracle of Hippo the power of baptizing the Lord retaineth to himself the Ministery he hath given to his servants And that School-man argued not amiss that framed this conclusion thence To baptize inwardly and to absolve from mortal sin are of equal power Paris potestatis est interiùs baptizare à culpa mortali absolvere sed Dâ—us non debuit potestatem baptizandi interiùs communicare ne spes poneretur in homine Ergo pari ratione nec potestatem absolvendi ab actuali Alex. Halens sum part 4. Qu. 21. Memb. 1. But God ought not to communicate the power of baptizing inwardly lest any hope should be placed in man therefore by the like reason ought he not to commit the power of absolving from actual sin unto any To conclude this point touching the Sacraments Cyprian or the Author of the XII Treatises De Cardinalibus operibus Christi writeth thus Forgiveness of sins Remissio peccatorum sive per baptismum sive per alia Sacramenta daretur propriè Spiritûs Sancti est ipsi soli hujus efficientiae privilegium manet Cypr. tract de bapt Chr. whether it be given by Baptisme or by other Sacraments is properly of the Holy Ghost and the privilege of effecting this remaineth unto him alone So much for the third mean wherein the power of the keys is exercised viz. in the due administration of the Sacraments The fourth and last thing wherein the power of the keys is discerned 4. By excommunication ecclesiastical censures consisteth in the interdictions and relaxations of publick Censures Therefore Divines refer the promise of the keys made unto Peter Matth. 16. to the Ministery and Preaching of the Gospel Illa de ligâ—ndo solvenâ—o Petro facta promissio non
A TREATISE OF THE CONFESSION OF SINNE And chiefly as it is made unto the Priests and Ministers of the Gospel Together with the power of the KEYS and of ABSOLUTION JOHN 20.23 Whose soever sins ye remit they are remitted unto them and whose soever sins ye retain they are retained Tantum relevat confessio delictum quantum dissimulatio exaggerat Confessio enim satisfactionis consilium est dissimulatio contumaciae Tertul. LONDON Printed by J.G. for Andr. Crook at the Green Dragon in St Pauls Church-yard M.DC.LVII The Principal CONTENTS OF THE WHOLE BOOK CHAP. I. THe names of things exemplifie their nature The Authors purpose Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth Repentance and Consolation which is variously rendred by the Septuagint Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Confession or a casting off by the same Interpreters is translated to give thanks and to praise Exagoreusis a forinsecal word an Indictment Exhomologesis Metanoea and Metameleia usuall in the New Testament Resipiscence and Penitude their difference and several uses pag. 1. CHAP. II. Repentance a Conversion and wherein it consisteth The Fathers define it from the sensible effects and signs thereof The Schoolmens errour in placing it in bodily corrections rather than in mental change The Reformed Divines seat it in the humiliation of the heart requiring also outward expressions of sorrow Conversion is the essential form of Repentance Self abnegation godly sorrow a Penitents practice and endeavour p. 10. CHAP. III. Discipline of penance wherefore enjoyned by the Church Exhomologesis divers kinds of Confession publick penance of Apostolical practice The austerity thereof in the Primitive times Order thereof prescrib'd in the dayes of Cyprian and Ambrose Divers examples of publick Penitents The solemn practick thereof in Records of the Church Sinners admitted but once to solemn Penance Actual reconciliation denyed by the Church to lapsed sinners No renewing unto Repentance how understood in the Epistle to the Hebrews Four stations observed by the ancient Penitents The restoring of this Discipline much desired p. 16. CHAP. IV. Confession of sin addressed unto God chiefly and to Man also with considerable relations grounded upon the Law of Nature with God himself a necessary antecedent to pardon Adam and Cain interrogated to extract Confession Sundry precedents of Penitents recoursing to God in Confession There is shame in confessing to God as well as unto Man Penitential Psalmes composed by David for memorials and helps to Confession The Rabbins doctrine of Confession of sin before God practised in the time of the Gospel preached and urged by the Ancient Fathers and so far by Chrysostome as a tribute due to God onely for which the Pontificians are jealous of him Confession before God is not destructive of Confession before man in a qualified sense though preferred before it and especially called for by the old Doctors although that be of singular use also p. 43. CHAP. V. Of Confession to Man The Confession of sin under the Law before the Priest at the Altar and the Sacrifice Special enumeration of all sins not required of the Jews The Law commandeth the acknowledgment of sin and restitution Jobs friends confessed their errours unto him who sacrificed for them Davids confession unto Nathan Rabbins affirming sins to be confessed unto the Fathers and Levites The place in St James chap. 5. Of mutual Confession explained and vindicated Testimonies of the Fathers for Confession unto man The opinion of the Schoolmen that sin in case of necessity and in way of Consultation for a remedy not in way of Absolution for reconcilement may be detected to a Lay-man and of the Reformed Divines That sins may be confessed to a Believing Brother for advice and to a Minister of the Gospel p. 65. CHAP. VI. Divers Offices and administrations in the Church The peoples Confession unto John at Jordan wherein they were particular The Confession of the Believers at Ephesus to St Paul Proofs from the Fathers for Confession to the Priests of the Gospel Such Confession withdraweth not from God but leadeth to him Testimonies of the worthiest Divines of the Church of England for Confession seconded with Divines of the Reformation from the Churches beyond the seas p. 90. CHAP. VII Concerning the Institution necessity and extent of Confession and is divided into three Sections p. 111. SECT I. The Decrees of the Tridentine Council for Divine right and authority of Confession The Anathema's hâ—ld too severe by some moderate Romanists Publick Exhomologesis vilipended by those Fathers The Schoolmens faintness in reasoning for the divine institution of Auricular Confession The Canonists plant the same upon the universal Tradition of the Church Divines siding with the Canonists Oppugners of Auricular Confession in former ages Pretences of Divine authority from places of Scripture examined Different proceedings in the Court of Conscience from earthly Tribunals Special cognizance of all sins not a necessary antecedent at all times to Priestly Absolution God pardoneth many sins immediately never spoken of to a Priest Differences of Popish Divines concerning the matter and form in Penance prove to be no such thing as Sacramental Confession which reacheth not higher than the Lateran Council Confession of sin of the same institution as Repentance is Divine institution manifold In what sense Confession may be said to be of Divine institution p. 113. SECT II. The abusive necessity of Confession Tyrannical inquisition into mens consciences distasteful Confession left at liberty in Gratians time Schoolmen leaning to the necessity thereof Confession not the onely Necessary means for absolution and remission The Ends aimed at in Popish confession unnecessary No express precept in Scripture for the absolute necessity thereof Confession an heavy burden upon fleshly shoulders Private Confâ—ssiâ—n not practised from the beginning Established in the place of the publick by an Edict from Leo I. The fact of Nectarius abrogating confession with the several answers and expositions of Roman writers expended Confession deserted in the Greek Church Divers kinds and forms of Necessity Confession in what cases necessary and the necessity thereof determined p. 144. SECT III. Scrupulous enumeration of all sins decreed in late Councils Circumstances aggravating and altering the property of sin Mill-stones to plain people Anxious inquisition into each sin with every circumstance a perplexed peece Particular reckonings for every sin an heavy load to the Conscience and without expâ—ess warranty from God implying difficulty and impossibility and tending to desperation No urgent necessity to be so superstitious in casting up of all sins and the circumstantial tails thereof Romish closets of confession Seminaries of sin and uncleanness Venial and reserved sins exempted by Rome from the ears of ordinary Priests upon what grounds Strict and specifick enumeration of sins but of late standing in the Church General Interrogatories proposed at the hour of death from Anselme Some sins are specially and by name to be rehearsed in confession The nature and quality of those sins described and determined p. 179. CHAP.
VIII Of the Confessary or Priest that receiveth confessions and his authority for the same Divided into two Sections p. 208. SECT I. The vulgarly disesteem of the power of Absolution in the hand of Priests Keys diverse Of 1. Authority 2. Excellency 3. Ministery The office of the Ministerial key in discerning and defining Ecclesiastical and conscientious Consistories The gift of Science in the Priest not properly the Key but the Guide Absolution a judicial act Magistrates spiritual and temporal distinguished in their jurisdiction and ends Bonds of sin culpable and for sin penal Satisfaction expiatory vindictive God forgiveth sins properly and effectively The Priest by way of application and notice as also dispositively qualifying by his function sinners for the same in which he proceedeth as a subordinate cause both declaratively and operatively The priority of binding and loosing on Earth to Heaven in respect of the sensible apprehension in the Penitent not of the purpose and operation in God Power of Absolution primitive in God in his Ministers derivative and delegate A Penitent absolving himself by the finger of Gods Spirit in what sense The power of binding in the Church rather privative than positive and declarative onely p. 211. SECT II. Peter seised of the keys to the use of the Church Power of Absolution conferred and confined unto Priests Laicks using the same not in case of officâ— buâ— nâ—cessity and where they are the parties grieved Boâ—ds of the soul â—nd sin onely loosed by this key The accomplishment â—nd actual donation of this power God remitteth by the Churches act The form of Priestly Ordination Heresie of the Novâ—â—ians denying in the Church power to reconcile Penitents Seed and bellows thereof austerity of those times Absolution in the Priest not absolutely efficacious but as relating to conditions in the Penitent The Priest not secured from failing in the act of absolution The erring key Priestly absolution declarative and demonstrative and in a moral sense energetical Judgments forinsecal are applied declarations of the Law to the fact Absolution a Ministerial act but powerful and judicial but not Soveraign nor despotical The spirit of judgment to discerne and determine how necessary for Priests in the act of absolution Fathers making Priests Judge of the Conscience The exercise of the keys 1. In the word oâ— reconciliation 2. In Prayer ancient forms of absolution expressed in a deprecative manner not indicative 3. In the Sacraments 4. In interdictions and relaxations of publick censures Keys abused at Rome dangerous to Soveraign Majesties and Republicks The superciliousness of Roman Priests in usurping upon Divine right subjecting the power of forgiveness in God to their arbitrements Their preposterous way in absolving first and afterwards in enjoyning Penance The feigned virtue of absolution Ex opere operato destructive of Piety and penitency Conditions requisite in the Penitent to be relieved by the keys and lawful use of Absolution p. 239. CHAP. IX Paternal affection in the Confessary Good for sheep if the shepherd know their diseases Medicinal Confession The grief better healed when clearer opened Ghostly counsel of great importance to a Penitent Great care in the choice of a discreet Confessor Rome's rigid Tenet Absolution denounced by any Priest besides the Ordinary to be invalid The inconveniences thereof The Parochial Priest not to be deserted without just cause and the same to be approved by the Diocesan p. 282. CHAP. X. Many positive precepts without fixed times The practick for times and seasons left to the Churches arbitration Times necessary for Confession when particular persons and consciences are perplexed Times convenient for all Christians 1. When visited with despâ—rate diseases 2. Vpon the undertaking of solemn actions and exploits accompanied with danger and needing special help from God 3. Vpon the receiving of the blessed Eucharist before which Confession to the Priest is alwayes Convenient and sometimes necessary and the neglect thereof in some cases damnable p. 295. CHAP. XI All convenient secrecy apprimely requisite in the Confessary Suspicion of discovery a great enemy to confession Sins already committed with expressions of grief to be concealed The Schoolmen bringing sins de futuro to be committed within the compass of the seal The damnable doctrine of the Jesuites that Treasons and Conspiracies yet plotting against Church or State and confessed to the Priest ought to be shut up in privacy The odious consectaries and inconveniences thereof Examples of sundry Confessors revealing treasons detected in Confession The preservation of Prince Church or State to be preferred before the secrecy of the Seal Sins opened in confession the concealment whereof complieth not with the Priests fidelity to his Prince and Countrey to be discovered Marriage in the Clergy no prejudice to the lawful secrecy of the seal especially if the penalty of the old Canons against the violaters thereof should be revived p. 300. CHAP. XII An Historical relation of the Canons and Constitutions of the Church of England concerning Confession and the practice thereof by some of the chief Members in the same p. 312. OF CONFESSION OF SINNE 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 BE perswaded industrious Reader to stand a little at the Gate and receive this light in the Porch lest a scandal may be taken where none is given The subject the Author of this ensuing discourse treateth upon is a duty of late times laid aside and which through the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and sluggishness of our devotion hath waxed old as it were and wasted it self but now beginneth to peep out from under a cloud of many abuses Inertiâ Caesarum quasi consenuit atque decoxit nisi sub Trajano Principe movet lacertos c. Florus Prolog histor and the sinews thereof requickned with spirits and motion as the Historian said of the decayed Empire of Rome And because the practice thereof is no whit plausible to flesh and bloud it is likely to be opposed by all such that are not guided by the Spirit He foreseeth also that some though otherwise well minded may herein be contrary-minded which may well come to pass by not looking narrowly into the duty it self covered under a mass of inordinances and thereupon crying down the duty because of the abuse But his hope is they will be better perswaded when they shall perceive the same to be defecated and disabused The matter it self is of no small importance and conducing to Repentance foâ— sin and Râ—mission And herein a great and learned Antiquâ—â—y said truly that the chiefest point of the Ecclesiastical state and function it taken up in Repentance it self the use and administration thereof Ecclesiasticae rei functionisque praecipua pars poenitenâ—ià â—jusque usu administratione continetur Dionys Petav. animadvers in Epiphan haeres 59. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gal. 1.10 His care hath been most in separating betwixt the light and darkness the thing it self and the abuse thereof and his aim the reviving of this discipline as it was
Priest is out the School distinguishing of the erring key confirmeth for what need to distinguishing of the erring key if the key never erreth therefore Lyra hedgeth him in Hoc tamen intelligendum â—st quando judicium ecclesiae divino judicio conformatur Lyr. in Ioan. c. 20. and tells him that his sentence is allowed of by God when the judgment of the Church is conformable to his Never any simple Priest hath been so arrogant as to assume this priviledge to be infallible the claim whereof the high-Priest at Rome hath made his prerogative but what will you say if the Pope hath erred and that in this present business of absolution and eke in his own case Read this ensuing story you that are devoted to his chair and tell me how you like it Popes have power to make choice of their Confessor of whom they please and there was a Pope perceiving his life to draw to an end Capellano suo authoritatem Apostolicam contulit se absolvendi sub plenaria remissione ut fieri solet in anno Jubilaeo that committed to a Chaplain of his own Apostolical power to absolve with plenary authority as in the year of Jubile By virtue whereof after confession made he received absolution and so departed this life Not many dayes after he appeared to his Chaplain with a heavy look and in a mourning weed and being demanded If he was the late Pope answered yea also the Chaplain desiring to know why he was so dejected in countenance and clothes for that quoth the Pope I am adjudged to eternal death Is it possible replied the Chaplain since upon thy confession thou receivedst the benefit of plenary absolution it is even so said the Pope Supremus judex absolutionem illam ratam non habuit Spec. Exempl dist â— Sec. 30. because the highest Judge would not ratifie that absolution The Relator tells us how by this apparition God would let us know that if it be so in the green wood and top of the Church we should consider what may fall out in the dry and under branches thereof where there is less authority that although God and the Pope have but one Consistory yet they are not alwayes of one mind and if Christ confirm not in heaven the sentence of his Vicar on earth we may well doubt if every Sir John's absolution discharge us before God and if the Popes keys may erre in his own case we may suspect their integrity in other mens and so we see the second link in this Sorites is feeble and apt to be broken For all this let it be granted that sins must be fully opened before the Priest can proceed to Sentence and that he could not proceed amiss in the sentence of absolution and pardon yet except God had made over the hearing of all sins unto his Priests Illa potestas remittendi peccata non ita intelligenda est data Sacerdotibus quasi Deus se eâ andicarit eam prorsùs transtulerit in Sacerdotes ità ut in absolutione non Deus sed Sacerdos remittat peccata Chemnit Exam part 2. p. 176. and reserved none to himself as not minding to be troubled about any such matters and had resolved neither to forgive the sin nor give the audience but to such onely as the Priests have remitted the argument would be the more impregnable But if our God be contrary minded as sure he is having shut out no sins from his gracious audience and is of so quick an ear as to hear the very desires of our hearts and so swift to mercy as to prevent oral Confession with a pardon how loosly doth this reason hang The present Greek Church upon confidence hereof addresseth her self unto God for a pardon even for those sins which upon some causes were left out in Confession Thus writeth their late Patriarch 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hierem. Patr. Constant ad Tubing Resp. 1. c. 11. Whatsoever sins the Penitent for forgetfulness or shamefastness doth leave unconfessed we pray the merciful and most pitiful God that those also may be pardoned unto him we are perswaded that they shall receive a pardon of them from God thus he God then remitteth sins never confessed to a Priest and ofttimes retaineth sins that are confessed for the Priests sentence is not alwayes agreeable with his nor of the same latitude and extent God remitting whomsoever the Priest assoileth if he proceed aright and many more besides and retaining whose sins soever he retaineth and many millions besides Thereupon Scotus observeth that the words of this Commission are not precise that is whatsoever you remit I remit also and no more and whatsoever you retain I retain and that onely For that many more sins are retained by God over and above those which the Priest retaineth is evident The Priest onely retaining such which are detected Illud verbum Quorum retinuerâ—ris c. non est praecisum non solùm enim illa râ—tenta sunt à Deo peccatori ad poenam quae retenta sunt à Sacerdote quia Sacerdos non retinet alâ—qua nisi aliquo modo sibi accusata sed signis indebitis poenitentiae tamen illa quae nullo modo sunt ostâ—nsa Sacerdoti Deus retinet ad vindictam Gehennae Ergò nec istud verbum Quorum remiseritis c. erit praecisum in such a confession whereof there are apparent signs that it proceeds not from a penitent heart in such cases where a sinner shall confess his sins and express no sorrow for the same like those Qui peccant publicant sin and glory in their sin wherein the Priest doth not absolve that is he retaineth and reserves for future sorrow or punishment Now God retaineth those that draw nigh to himself and the Priest with their lips but are far from both in their hearts God I say retaineth these and all those likewise that are not known to the Priest if they be not repented of to be punished in hell fire So for the other member viz. remission of sins If more sins be retained by God than are by the Priests it followeth that more sins are forgiven by God than are by Priests also for be it far from us to think that God shall be more strict than the Priest in retaining and not more copious than the Priest in pardoning or that God should exceed the Priest in detention of sins and not in remission No no God is rich in mercy and though in mercy he so far remember justice as to retain more sins than Priests take notice of yet his goodness is so great as to forgive more than Priests are able to take notice of or well understand Therefore the Commission runnes in words affirmative and not negative as if the remission and retention of sinnes made by the Apostles were precisely equall and of the same dimensions with the remission and retention of sinnes made by God which the negative termes if they
had been added had also comprised for Christ doth not say by way of negation after this manner Undè neutri affirmationi adiunxit negativam denotantem remissionem factam ab Apostolis vel retentionem esse praecisam respâ—ctu remissionis retentionis à Deo faciendae Scâ—tus lib. 4. dist â—7 whose sinnes soever ye remit not they are not remitted and whose sinnes soever ye retain not they are not retained for then the power in the hand of the Priest had been adequate unto that of God himself and all sins must necessarily have come through their hands to Absolution But their power is as a lesser sphere wrapt in a greater a spark onely of that celestiall flame or as the crumbs which fall from their Masters Table For example as every thing that standeth under the roof of an house is under the cope of heaven but not wwhatsoever is under the Sun is included under that roof so accordingly whatsoever the Priest remitteth according to Gods Word God remitteth but not convertibly whatsoever God remitteth the Priest remitteth There remaineth then forgiveness for sin in store besides that which the Priest ratione officii bequeatheth Therefoâ—e all sins are not restrained to Priestly remission nor by consequence to Auricular Confession as the onely means to come by absolution and pardon and so the third link is broken Last of all let it be granted that the Apostles and their successors have power from hence to remit sins not principally but Ministerially by way of arbitration and that they cannot arbitrate in an unknown cause and thereupon the matter which they are to decide is to be made known unto them and let that manifestation be granted to be confession what will follow from hence No more in the judgment of Scotus Ratio ista benè concludit quòd Sacramentum poenitentiae est institutum à Christo tanquam utile efficax non tamen sequitur ex hoc quòd sit neceâ—â—â—riò recipiendum ut cadens sub praecepto quia extrema unctio est instituta à Christo confi mationis Sacâ—amentum tamen neutrum est simpliciter necessarium nec est praeceptum dâ— isto vel isto recipiendo Siâ—t quatuor Sacerdotes quorum quilibet habet authoritatem absolvendi istum peccatorem non tâ—mâ—n tenetur peccator se cuilibet submittere sedillorum uni cui voluerit Scot. supr then that this was a good and profitable ordinance instituted by Christ yet not necessary to be observed for instance whereof Confirmation and extream Vnction which go for Sacraments at Rome as well as Penance both must be thought to be of divine institution yet neither adjudged necessary nor is there saith this Schoolman any precept urging the use thereof So here Arbitrators are appointed in cases of conscience but no express command for any to submit to that arbitration Pose le cas There are 4. Priests with equal power of absolution yet a Penitent being in place is not tied to submit to any one but to whom he please Here is then a judgment-seat erected a Judge set upon the Pench with commission to hear and determine of all sins and yet no sinners compelled to come in but such as please It seemeth Scotus held the words of Christ to invest the Priest with the power of a Judge and Arbiter in the case of sin to him that voluntarily submitted to that Trâ—bunal but withall that the words command not sinners to consent and subject themselves precisely to that jurisdiction At Caesars judgment seat Paul stood and ought to be judged here a sinner may stand if he please and be judged if he please and subject himself to that censure but he oweth no necessary service thereunto This seemeth to be this Doctors opinon though I suppose the business dependeth not upon this uncertainty but that there are some kind of sins though not all and some sort of sinners too though not all that not onely may but must come in be judged here if they love the welfare of their souls as we shall see hereafter Let us now gather up the broken pieces of this Argument 1. The Priest is to have notice of the sins of the Penitent before he can proceed to censure that 's true but a general knowledge may sometimes suffice without exaction at all times of particular Items 2. The Priest is constituted a Judge in such cases that peradventure is true but then he is fallible and often erring in judgment 3. The Priest remitteth sins that 's true in a good sense but God remitteth more properly and more then he and many more without him 4. The Court of Conscience is up the Judge enabled with authority and is present at the Bench to hear true but liberty is left to Christians to resort or not to submit or not to that jurisdiction Thus this Master-proof hangs together like a rope of sand for the matter it self I suppose great is the authority which Christ in this place hath put his Priests in and to great purpose questionless as in due time may appear and great care is to be taken by such that depend upon them how they frustrate not the power of God or rather their own souls of salvation for the Priests bear not this power in vaine Nor may the Spiritual men vainly imagin that they are in place Qui ex his cristas erigunt tyrannidem quandam sibi vendicant cur non meminerint corum quae mox praecesserint Erasm Hunc locum quidam non intelligentes aliquid sumunt de supercilio Pharisaeorum c. Hieron in Matth. 16. cristas erigere aliquid sumere de supercilio Pharisaeorum as Hierome said of some to become Pharisaically insolent or tyrannical nor are the people to dread the same as an usurpation upon their consciences but to be perswaded that this power is conferred for their peace this Physick for their diseases and this Ministery for their reconciliation Therefore when other Physick will not work prove this when the peace of Conscience cannot otherwise be had seek it here and when thy Reconciliation can no way else be made use these Arbiters and Mediators And although Christ hath not expresly charged thee to repair unto this Court to lay open thy case before these Judges Duo ista sibi mutuò respondent ut ubi nulla est consessio ibi nulla esse possit absolutio Confess Pertcroviae p. 252. 2. and submit thy self unto their censure yet consider how God would never constitute a Judge without a Circuit nor erect a Court without a jurisdiction and bethink with thy self for thy good all this was and is ordained He hath said Dixit Medicis ut curarent sed non dixit infirmis ut ad Medicos curandi causâ venirent hoc enim quasi certum esse voluit quod Aegri libenter se Medicis curandos offerrent Hugo and commanded his Physicians to heal and hath not said unto the sick Go ye to
wronged and this is morale positivum the morall positive part of the law 2. Modus à lege Confâ—ssio mâ—ntalis quae fit Deo est de dictamine legis naturae adjutae quodammodo per fidem Raymand sum tract 4. To confesse unto the Priest This manner of confession was injoyned by God and this is Positivum divinum the divine positive part of the law 3. But Virtus à gratia true confession whether to God Jam donum Spiritus Sancti habet qui confitetur poenitet quia non potest esse confessio peccati compunctio in homine ex scipso Aug. in Ps 1. or to his Priest is from the working of the holy spirit it being fulfilled in this as in all other graces what hast thou O man that thou hast not received The Ceremonial part which consisted in the Sacrifice ceaseth for a Christian hath another Altar and another Sacrifice Ex necessitate Consequentiae Christ Jesus slain upon the Crosse by vertue whereof his Priests assure the Penitent of pardon absolution For the second Confession is of divine right by way of deduction For if the use of the keys in the Ministery of the Priests be divine as it cannot be denied but that they are so and if that use consisteth in absolution and if that absolution ever presupposeth and cannot be denounced without precedaneous confession the consequent will tye them together for the world cannot break the relation that is betwixt Confession and absolution Ratione exempli And for the last a precedent we have in the Acts of the Apostles seconded with the practice of the Church as hath been declared Thou seest Good Reader how confession pretendeth to divine right in a strict sense Jus divinum laxè vel strictè sumptum hoc in S. literis invenitur illud ex earum sive instituto sive exemplis analogia recta ratione deducitur Azorius Instit Mor. part 2. l. 1. c. 2. as injoyned in the Scripture and in a large as a necessary consequent deducted by rational proportion from divine premisses how the same is corroborated by examples set forth in the Scripture and by ecclesiastical practice set forth in the discipline of the Church likewise This I must be interpreted to speak of Confession unto Gods Ministers in generall without respect to the manner thereof privately or publickly performed Which I think is left to the power of the Church to determine There was a time when the publick performance thereof was all in all that was left off and the private doing thereof succeeded in the room to supply that defect and which at the first alteration was esteemed to be no more Sacramentall or of no more necessity for obtaining remission of sinnes than the former So that the course taken herein may well be thought to have the nature of a temporall law which as Saint Austin saith although it be just Appellemus istam legem si placâ—t temporalem quae quâ—mvis justa sit commutari tamen per tempora justè potest Aug. de lib. arb lib. 1. cap. 6. yet in time may be justly changed Canus acknowledgeth confession in its own nature for a divine ordinance but for the Condition thereof secret or open he referreth to be ordered by naturall prudence his words are these Confession of sinnes ought to be made unto the Priest Confessio peccatorum Sacerdoti fieri debet non solùm ex traditione majorum verùm etiam ex Evangelico testimonio quod quidem est de necessitate Sacramenti Secretam verò aut publicam confessionem fiâ—ri prudentiae est naturali relictum quae dictat ut occulta occultè publica publicè jud centur Canus Relect. de poen p. 6. not onely by tradition from our Ancestors but also by testimony from the Gospel and this is of the necessity of the Sacrament But whether Confession should be secret or publick that 's left to natural prudence which willeth that secret sinnes should be judged in secret and those which are publick publickly Michael Vehe frameth to himself this objection Let it be granted that these words whose sinnes soever ye remit c. infer a confession to be made of all sinnes whatsoever which seeing it may be performed two waies privately or publickly and neither way by Christ commanded both would seeme of equall necessity But no man can say that publick confession is necessary and why may not so much be said of private answereth thus We say and affirm neither way of Confession to be necessary by any precept from Christ Respondemus dicimus neutrum confiteâ—di modum â—sse ex praecepto Christi necessarium utrumque autem necessarium sub distinctione liberum est ergo ecclesiae eligere illum vel illum cum autem etiam secretam voluerit esse confessionem ad publicam non tenemur Vehe tract 6. de Sacr. Poen c. 4. and yet both necessary with a distinction The Church then was left to her choise to take which she pleased and seeing she hath embraced to confess in secret we are not tyed to the publick Which two assertions how far they cut the throat of Clancular confession Rome may doe well to consider Confession then in it self may be of Divine right and the manner thereof whether private or publick a Churches constitution and which way the Church should conceive to be most profitable and command the use what am I that should contradict the same to whose benigne censure I submit what I have here resolved concerning the institution SECT II. The Contents The abusive necessity of Confession Tyrannicall inquisition into mens consciences distastfull Confession left at liberty in Gratian's times Schoolmen leaning to the necessity thereof Confession not the onely necessary means for absolution and remission The ends aimed at in Popish confession unnecessary No expresse precept in Scripture for the absolute necessity thereof Confession an heavy burden upon fleshly shoulders Private confession not practised from the beginning Established in the place of the Publick by an edict from Leo 1. The fact of Nectarius abrogating confession with the severall answers and expositions of Roman Writers expended Confession deserted in the Greek Church Divers kinds and formes of Necessity Confession in what cases necessary and the Necessity thereof determined WE are now come to the necessity of confessing a point necessarily to be opened the over-pressing of the same upon mens Consciences hath been thought a kind of Tyranny and hath caused the busie obtruders thereof to be suspected as if they aimed at their own ends and sought not those things that are of Christ Jesus Lording it over the Consciences of the people making their keyes become pick-locks and themselves not Seers but Spies not Judges but Accusers not Physicians but Betrayers not good Samaritans to bind up the wounds but cruel Tyrants to rent them wider More than time it is to consider of these things and to discharge the
duty it self of such abuses And from our endeavours herein hath sprung the controversie between Rome and us viz. our dislike of such a commanding necessity as shall lay violent hands upon a sinner and urge him to this Physick against his will where ofttimes the Purge becomes more violent than the disease and the potion more bitter than the grief it self The profit and great good reaped by Confession we willingly subscribe unto but confession upon the rack is that we distaste It is not called into question saith a Roman Doctor Non versatur in quaestione num utilis salutaris sit consessio nam Adversarii hoc ultrò donant sed hoc in contentionem rapitur An enumeratio delictorum in confessione sit de jure divino necessaria M. Vehe â—â—act de secreto Confess c. 1. Lypsiae 1535. but no Tridentine whether confession be beneficial and wholesome for our adversaries grant this of their own accord but the controverted point is whether the numbring up of sins in confession be necessary by Gods law or not The Trent Fathers decree the same to be a matter of necessity laid upon the necks of all sinners and plant their sixt Canon Si quis negaverit confessionem Sacramentalem vel institutam vel ad salutem esse necessariam jure divino c. Anathema sit Con. Trid. cap. 5. can 6. to discharge Anathema's against all such as shall deny the institution of confession and the necessity thereof from divine right for the obtaining of salvation Many moderate Divines of Germany as Chemnitius witnesseth endeavoured pacification herein as desirous to lenifie and mitigate the severity of this Papal practice with gentle Medicines Conati fuerunt multi Pontificii scriptores in Germania praesertim acerbitatem legis Pontificiae de confessione variis pharmacis mitigare sed concilium sine misericordia durissimas conditiones Pontificiae confessionis renovat confirmat stabilit Chem. Exam. part 2. p. 195. but that merciless council ratified and injoyned bitter pills and sharp receipts very corrosive upon the Consciences of men as apprimely necessary for the health of their soules And observes the progresse and proceeding how Confession came by those necessary tyes In the Primitive Church it was used as a profitable and wholsome discipline and did much good in restraining from sin and in pacifying the conscience after sin full and frequent are the passages in the volumes of the Fathers looking this way and commending the same to our Christian care Apud Patres extant exhortationâ—s ad confessionem disciplinae grâ—tiá Gratiani Lombardi t mpore coeptum suit d sputari An necessaria fuit confessio Gratianus Iaectori liberum permittit Judicium Longobardus â—inclinat ad necessitat m. Chemnit ib. p. 198. but in their dayes it was but exhortative not compulsatory After their dayes in Gratians time the necessity thereof came to be disputed yet so as nothing peremptorily was then resolved The Master of the sentences seemed to incline and draw to that opinion which held the same to be necessary and that which in his time was but probable and which might piously be embraced began at length to be entertained as certain and firmly to be believed And so now a necessity is laid upon us with a woe and an Anathema if we come not to confession It is very true what he spake of those two 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lombard Gratian the Castor and Pollux of Canonical and School-Divinity for Gratian reciteth at large the several sentences of the Doctors and at length leaves the matter wholly in suspense after this manner Vpon what authorities Quibus authoritatibus vel quibus rationum firmâ—mentâ—s utraque s nâ—â—ntia innitatur in medium brevitâ—â— expâ—â—â—iâ—us Cui autem potiùs adhaerendum siâ— Lâ—â—toris judicio reservatuâ— utraque enâ—â— fautores habet sapientes religiosos viâ—os De Ioen dist 1. c. 89. Quamvis or upon what strength of reasons both these opinions are grounded I have briefly laid open but to whethâ—r of them we should adhere is reserved to the judgment of the Reader for both of them have for their Favourers wise and religious men The Scales it seems hung so even that he durst not turn them to either side and so the business rested in suspense and undecided in his time which was MCL. years after Christ and all that while Christianity stood without this decision Peter Lombard hangs something upon one scale who proposing these questions 1. Whether sin is remitted upon contrition of the heart onely 2. Whether confession unto God sufficeth without any unto the Priest 3. And whether confession may be made to a faithful Lay man Of which In his docti diversa sentire inveniuntur quia super his varia ac penè diversa tradidisse videntur Doctores l. 4. d. 17. Sect. 1. learned men saith he are found to hold diversly and concerning them the Doctors seem to have delivered diverse yea and almost adverse resolutions But his resolution is thus framed Dici pot st quòd sine confessione oris solutione poenae exterioris peccata delentur per contritionem humilitatem cordis Quae dicta sunt de confessione Poenitentia vel ad confessionem cordis vel ad interiorem poenam referenda sunt ad contâ—mnâ—ntes vel negligentes referenda It may be said that sins are remitted upon contrition and humility of the heart without oral confession and performance of external punishment And that such testimonies of the Doctors as import confession are to be undeâ—stood of the inward Confession of the heart or else touch those as neglect and contemn confession which is made unto the Priest But he addeth withall that a Penitent ought to confess if he have time Oportet poenitentem si tempus habeat confiteri tamen antequâ—m sit confessio in ore si votum sit in cordâ— praestatur ei remissio yet before confession be in the mouth if there be a resolution thereof in the heart that a man is forgiven But afterwards he grows more peremptory From these and more proofs then these it appeareth without all doubt Oportet Deo primùm deinde Sacerdoti offerri confessionem nâ—c aliter posse pervenire ad ingressum Paradisi Id. ib. that confession ought to be tendred unto God first thence to the Priest if he may be had otherwise there can be no possibility of coming into Paradise This Magisterial determination hath these parcels 1. sin is remitted upon inward confession 2. a purpose of Confession is required for the remission of sin 3. the neglect or contempt of Confession either to God or the Priest is damnable 4. Confession of sin if opportunity serve is actually to be made unto God and the Priest upon peril of exclusion from Gods kingdome Thus the Master and we cannot expect better from the disciples for usually they are more forward and say more than those
that taught them and especially seeing the Council of Trent hath had so little compassion in this case we are out of hope that any Divines of that side should abate any thing of this decreed rigouâ— It remaineth that we examine the grounds why this extreme necessity is imposed for Laws and ordinances are not usually enacted nor necessarily exacted except upon sound purposes and ends And if those ends may be obtained without them or come by upon better termes or if the goodness thereof be ended the Laws are repealed the ordinances taken away and the necessity ceaseth this being a received Maxim that the necessity of the means must not exceed nor be above the necessity of the end and if the end be not judged necessary the like judgment must be had of the means Again such means are onely deemed necessary which serve for the attaining of the end and so far forth as without them such a proposed end cannot be accomplished For example If eating and drinking be onely necessary for this life then if I had no necessity to live I might have no necessity to eat Again If I am to go a journey it is not necessary that I shall go afoot because I may be carried two things then constitute the necessity of the mean aptitude and propriety that it be fit and onely fit to compass such a design These notions presupposed we shall inquire into the foundations of this necessity in exacting confession and if neither the end be necessary to be had nor the means so requisite for the due obtaining thereof we shall then cast away this necessity as an exaction it being a burden not to be endured which is sustained to no purpose and a tyrannie which laies a necessity upon the conscience where Christian liberty is every way as behoofeful The first ground of this imposition is upon a supposed perill of salvation for these men teach that as there is no reconciliation with God without remission of sin so no sin is remitted without confession or at least a purpose thereof unto a Priest for saith Bellarmine A necessary mean to reconcilement after Baptisme Medium necessarium ad reconciliationem post baptismum est confessio peccatorum omnium Sacerdoti sacta Lib. 3. de poenit cap. 2. is Confession of all sins made unto a Priest And hence it is they urge it so closely Confession to a Priest not necessary in all cases and to all persons necessitate medii and too urgent they cannot be if so great a matter were at stake But the question is whether the mean proposed be necessary to this end yea or no and whether remission of sins can be obtained of God no other way for if it may then we must conclude this not to be an adequate mean conducing thereunto for we must now consider of Confession not as an help and a kind of mean and in some sort of sinners onely but whether or no it be the onely mean for all sinners to gain a pardon for there can be no necessity for a Felon to use the mediation of one man onely to his Prince for pardon except the Prince be resolute to pardon no other way Now God hath not any where revealed so much that no mercy shall be had but upon such a condition nor dare the Jesuites confine him unto any such Christ the Author of the Sacraments Christus author Sacramentorum à Sacramentis suis non dependebat ideò non modò sine confessione sed etiam sine Baptismo peccata interdum remittebat Lib. 3. de poen c. 17. depended not upon his Sacraments and therefore did remit sins sometimes not onely without Confession but without Baptisme also saith Bellarmine Yea in the ordinary course remission of the sin comes in betwixt contrition of the heart and confession of the mouth Saint Augustine upon these words Non dicitur Ore confessus fuerit sed conversus ingemuerit undè datur intelligi quòd etiam ore tacente veniam interdum consequimur hinc Leprosi illi quibus Dominus praecepit ut ostenderent se Sacerdotibus in itinere antequam ad Sacerdotes venirent mundati sunt Aug. apud Magistr lib. 4. d. 17. Sect. 1. At what time soever a sinner shall be converted ingemuerit and shall groan he shall live and not die writeth thus It is not said and shall confess with his mouth but being converted shall grâ—an fâ—om whence is given to understand that sometimes we obtain a pardon when our lips are shut hence it was that those Lepers whom the Lord commanded to shew themselves unto the Priests in the way were healed before they came unto them And as Lazarus was first raised by the Lord Lazarus etiam non priùs de monumento eductus postea à Domino suscitatus sed intùs suscitatus prodiit foras vivus ut ostenderetur suscitatae animae praecedere confessionem Lombard and loosed from the power of death before he came forth of his grave so a sinner is first raised by Grace and loosed from the bonds of sin and guilt before he can come forth to Confession This order the Master observes 1. Nemo suscitatur nisi qui à peccato solvitur None can be raised but must be loosed first from Death because sin is the death of the soul and this solution is absolution 2. Nullus confitetur nisi resuscitatus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Psal 6.5 for as speech is the argument of life so confession of grace and in morte quis confiâ—ebitur tibi In death there is no remembrance of thee and in the grave who shall confess unto thee Now the mean in execution ever precedes the end Confession then is not the means to purchase remission which goes before it therefore Gabriel dislâ—kes this course and tels us That many Confessio quòd sit necâ—ssaria in actu varii variis mâ—des osâ—â—ndere niâ—untur sed plerique insufficienter qâ—idâ—m non potest ostendi suffiâ—ienter ex necessitate remissionis p ccâ—ti quâ—mvis remissio pâ—ccaâ—i sit necessaria ad salutem tum quia ad remission m peccati est alius modus sussiciâ—ns sine confessione in actu sc Contritio cordis per quam peccatum remittitur priusquam Peccator Sacerdoti consitâ—atur tum quia confâ—ssio secundum probabiliorem opinionem praeexigit remissionâ—m peccati per contritionem praeviam per hoc nunquam per confessionâ—m remittitur pâ—ccatâ—m sed eam praesupponit Biel. l. 4. d. 17. Qu. 1. and â—n a diverse manner have gone abâ—ut to shew the necessity of actual confession but for the most part very insufficiently and truly it cannot sufficiently be demonstrated from the necessity of remission of sin although remission of sin be necessary to Salvation for that there is another mean sufficient to come by forgiveness of sin without actual confession namely contriâ—ion of heart whereupon the sin is forgiven before the sinner can confess
unto the Priest And for that confession prerequireth forgiveness of sin according to the more probable opinion by an antecedent sorrow and by reason whereof sin is never forgiven by confession but is presupposed by it Thou wilt reply how Biel speaketh of actual confession and not of potential or the purpose and resolution in the heart to confess which is ever concomitant with contrition I answer Holy vows and purposes not reduced into act are in themselves of no worth but in case where they shall earnestly be endeavoured to be put in act and to be effected but the ability being wanting or disappointed by some greater power then they are taken for the deed and a faithful promise of confession is as good as confession it self Here when a Priest is at hand there needs no such vow or purpose there being no likelyhood the same should be crossed or intercepted this actual confession then supposeth none that is promissory I desire therefore this popish block may no more be cast in the way 2. Nâ—cessitas Finis Ends prescribed in popish shâ—â—ft unnecessary Other ends then may be excogitated and for them confession may be thought a necessary mean for sure the shoe wâ—ll not fit this foot the Question is indeed and upon this occasion proposed by the Master of the Sentences If it be demanded why Confession should be necessary Ad quid confessio necessariâ— cùm in contritionâ— jam deletum sit peccatum Resp 1. per conf ssionem intelligit Sacerdos qualiter debeat judicare de crimine 2. per eam peccator fit humilior cautior Lomb. l. 4. dist 17. Sect. ult since the sin already is blotted out by Contrition In answering to that demand he flies to other ends 1. As to inform the Priest of the nature of the offence and what he is to judge thereof but there can be no great end of that information when the sin is cancelled for why should another man remember when God hath forgotten it 2. And to make the sinner more humble and more cautelous Conduce it may somewhat this way but there are better texts for those themes and auricular Confession left out some inducements these but no ncessary prescriptions Furthermore saith Gabriel If we will narrowly and circumspectly listen unto the virtue of Confession Si funditùs atten â—â—mus viâ—tutem Conf ssionis ipsa non est instituta sâ—ltem in actu tanquam necessaria remissioni pâ—ccatorum sed hanc praesupponit sâ—d propter tria institâ—ta est 1. sc ut Peccator innotescat Ecclesiae tanquam absolutus 2. ut certa satisfactioÌ„ per quam poena peccati tollitur à Confessore imponâ—tur 3. ut poenae pars virtute Sacramentalis absolutionis remittatur Gab. Biel. ib. it was not instituted at least in act as necâ—ssary for the forgiveness of sin but that it supposeth but it was ordained for three other purposes 1. that the sinner might appear unto the Church to be absolved 2. That a certain satisfaction might be imposed by the Confessor whereby the punishment of sin may be taken off 3. and that a part of the punishment might be remitted by Priestly absolution Grave considerations and weighty sure but the scales must then hang at Rome to weigh them in else with us on this side of the Alpes they will be found lighter than vanity it self and in Biels own judgment imposition of penance the second reason is not so necessary to a discreet Penitent that c n allot himself a just portion for his sin yea absolution saith he may be injoyned without any imposition of penance at all Non videtur necessarium praesertim ubi consitens non indiget infâ—â—mâ—tione poena quae hic non solvitur solvetur in futuro fient queque tales salvi sed non nisi per igâ—em Gab. ib. as he saith if the Penitent will run the hazard of Purgatory and not make payment here but defer till then where the utmost pardon shall be exacted And in truth prescription of penance is the principal mark aimed at in Popish shrift and satisfaction the choicest imployment where Penitents are taught more to rely upon that reed and arm of flesh than upon him that dyed upon the Cross Like the Ambassadours of Ptolomaeus and Cleopatra who acknowledged in their Masters name Plus eos S. P. Q. R. quà m parentibus ejus quà m Diis â—mmortalibus debere per quos obsidione miserrimâ liberati essent regnum propè amissum recepissent Tit. Livius lib. 45. Sect. 13. that their Countrey was more bound to the Senate and people of Rome for their deliverance from a miserable siege and for the restitution of their kingdome in danger to be lost than to their own dear Parents yea than to the immortal Gods Let I say their actions be scanned and their intentions thereby discerned and when these ends are resolved to be necessary let confession be decreed to be so also 3. Necessitas Praecepti But what say you to the third necessity which is of Precept and Command Indeed Divine precepts should not be questioned but observed Let there be shewed any mandamus from heaven with a peremptory command for Confession upon such conditions and we submittimus fasces will yield the Bucklers as extremely loth to espouse any contrary opinion to the express word of God Therefore speak Lord for thy servants would gâ—adly hear The Lord hath said indeed Except a man be born again of water and of the Spirit but no where Except a man repent and be shriven by a Priest he cannot enter into the kingdome of God This is it the School-men and Jesuites have sought for narrowly Quod Cajetanus in Commentariis super hunc locum asserit institutionem Sacramenti Poenitentiae indè haberi non praeceptum certissimè fallitur Canus Relect. de Poenit. pag. 899. and are yet to seek And how well they have found it in these words whose sins soever ye remit c. hath in part been discussed and Cajetan saith but is checked for so saying that the institution of repentance may there be found but no precept A late Sorbonist hath found another Precept Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart Tout homme qui a perdula grace est tenu obliegé de droit divine de la recouvrer attendu que pas commandment express il est tenu d'aimer Dieu de tout son Cour Diliges Dominum c. Or celui qui n'a point la grace n'aime point son Dieu l'homme pecheur est privé de cete grace il est donc tenu de la recouvrer il la recouvre en confessant ses pechez au Prestre Pierre Bess Caâ—esme Tom. 2. p. 723. A Paris 1628. c. But how is Auricular confession concluded here marry thus The man that hath lost the grace of God is by Gods law obliged to recover the same for so much as by the commandment
and by the same authority be abolished by which it was at first prescribed and for the second how far necessary as an Ordinance Divine and in what sense it may be said to be ordained by God I must send back my Reader to the former Section where the point is stated We will tread the footsteps of necessity in the Schoolmens path and see what will result from thence Necessitas Praecepti Medii with them necessity is twofold 1. As a necessary Precept 2. or a needful mean Now every just command is grounded upon some reason and every lawful mean conduceth to some good In Divine Precepts we are not scrupulous to enquire after the Cause or Reason thereof but where Gods pleasure is to set it down for with us his will passeth for a cause all-sufficient So then it is necessary to salvation to obey all Gods commands or to repent for the disobedience although all his divine Precepts conduce not necessarily thereunto Josh 6.18 At the sacking of Jericho the spoils were devoted to the Lord and the Israelites might reserve nothing to themselves a necessity there lay in obeying the same though the commandment it self was not so necessary In the old Law as I shewed before there was a precept for Confession and in the new a president for the same why should it not then be thought necessary But take this along with you Positive Precepts contained in the Scripture are not to be extended further than the written Word or intention of the Law-giver direct for example God intendeth pardon upon sincere confession of the sin committed which Pardon when it may be had upon confession made unto God himself we extend it not unto Man So again if it may be procured upon a general confession before man we urge not the Delinquent to be particular but if the Conscience cannot be pacified except the pungitive sin be discovered in that case we require a special detection of that sin by name So then if the intended pardon may be compassed by any of these wayes that way is to be reputed necessary for that penitent which served the turn If by none but by all of these all of these then are necessary Moreover Gods word commandeth sins to be discovered to the Priest in termes absolute without further circumstance we dare not therefore extend that precept to the manner thereof whether it should be publick or private of all sins or some followed with remorse of Conscience and whether with the addition of aggravating circumstances or no. I say we lay no necessity of these cases upon any because we have not any express word for our warrant we counsel onely that no man permit sin to lie still in his bosome so long as he feels pain but complain still to his Physician till the cure be perfect Thus for the necessity of Precept The second branch is necessitas medii And we are to judge of that necessity by the end for no mean can be of greater necessity than the end for which it serveth and if the end be found necessary the mean must be thought to be so and in means we are to enquire if the proposed end may be attained by one onely mean or by divers some means may be useful but not necessary as a horse for a journey or simply necessary as wings to flie To apply remission of sins is the end a Penitent proposeth to himself which to compass we say that confession to a Priest is not of absolute necessity as the adequate only mean for faith in Christ who onely hath deserved it is also required nor a necessary concurrent mean for of faith I read but never of Auricular Confession that without faith it is impossible to please God but onely a conditional mean and so the necessity thereof hypothetical in some cases of Conscience to be instanced hereafter for sin in no case may be remitted without God in many without man But if we take confession as a medium utile in that sense we shall ever approve thereof although we resolve confession in it self not to be of absolute necessity for all but a precept binding some sinners and for some special sins onely As the holy Eucharist is a Sacrament of divine institution and singular benefit necessary to some Christians and at some times and the contempt thereof at all times damnable though in it self not simply necessary nor at all times nor to be imposed upon all persons without discretion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 then for all that can be said this Confession challengeth not any such necessity in it self as inherent in the same or any way belonging of soveraign virtue and necessary use but as a condition supposed for the acquiring of some necessary good Necessitas conditionalis seu necessitas consequentiae non est absoluta nec competit subjecto ex natura rei sed solùm consequitur ad talem suppositionem vel conditionem ex qua necessariò infertur id quod ex tali conditione dicitur necessarium necessitate secundum quid lic èt absolutè secundum se est liberum contingens Alvarez de Auâ—il l. 3. Disp 22. n. 40. viz. forgiveness of sins and reconciliation a penitent taking all good courses to ingratiate himself into the favour of God and this is onely conditional necessity and by way of consequence and so far to be urged as we shall find it a cause to promote the same and further we neither require nor urge it And amiss it cannot be that shall promove so good an end nor superfluous that advanceth such a purpose nor a heavy burden that brings so happy a benefit SECT III. The Contents Scrupulous enumeration of all sins decreed in late Councils Circumstances aggravating and altering the property of sin Mill-stones to plain-people Anxious inquisition into each sin with every circumstance a perplexed piece Particular reckonings for every sin a heavy load to the Conscience and without express warranty from God implying difficulty and impossibility and tending to desperation No urgent necessity to be so superstitious in casting up of all sins and the circumstantial tailes thereof Romish closets of Confession seminaries of sin and uncleanness Venial and reserved sins exempted by Rome from the ears of ordinary Priests upon what grounds Strict and specifick enumeration of sins but of late standing in the Church General Interrogatories proposed at the hour of death from Anselme Some sins are specially and by name to be rehearsed in Confession The nature and quality of those sins described and determined WE are now come unto the Contents of Confession namely sins and hence a difference springeth betwixt us and Rome about the extent and latitude thereof Whether forsooth all and every sin committed after Baptisme together with every aggravating circumstance following every sin be to be laid at the Priests feet and whether such an institution of such a Confession comprising all sins together with their remarkeable circumstances to
Roman Penitents yet he cries out Psal 19.12 Psal 38.5 Who can understand his errors cleanse me from my secret sins and again My iniquities are gone over my head Nimirum intelligebat quanta esset peccatoruÌ„ nostrorum abyssus quâ—m multae scelerum facies quot capita serret quà m longam caudam traheret haec Hydra Calvin Institut l. 3. c. 4. Sect. 16. as a burden they are too heavy for me Now truly he well understood how great a depth of sins there is how many strange countenances and shapes they resemble how many heads they lift up and how great a traine and long tail of circumstances this Hydra draweth after it Therefore he busieth not himself in drawing an Inventory of each several sin but cries out of the depth unto the Lord that the waters have entred into his soul that his sins are too heavy that there is no health in his bones nor rest in his conscience and in such termes spreads his sins before the Lord by better expressions than in any Method or formes of Confession and thereof are diverse set forth by our New Masters I must not forget that Popish writers streitned with the pressure of this reason remit something of the rigour and exact no further account than of such sins occurring unto the memory Ea solùm quae post diligentem excussionem memoriae occurrunt Bellar. de Poen l. 3. cap. 16. and seriously called to mind at the time of Confession and how poor a remnant this is to the sands of the Sea and how small a gleaning after so great a harvest that handful reserved for that time maketh manifest Confess all and every sin is the precept that is such onely as you can remember is the exception a gentle glosse for a severe law and as the injunction it self is too rigorous so the limitation is too ridiculous The Graecian Dame defiled by the Deacon in Sozomen confessed her sin 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Strom. 1. p. 217. lin 11. which I read rather distinctly than partially and so used by Clemens Alexandrinus viz. the doctrine of Christ deduceth providence unto things in singular yet a distinct confession of sin differeth from a distinct confession of all sins and a sinner may be particular in some though not singular in all offences a matter as we said of impossibility 3. Obligation of confessing sins all and singular a point of desperation Our third exception that to oblige the conscience to confess every sin with the pertinent circumstance is a doctrine of desperation for confess I must all my sins else look for no comfort from Gods hands and the Priests Now what soul can tell he hath told all his sins Thou wilt say tell all thou art able do thy best endeavour to lay open all and then though some are left out thou art discharged I do my best and part my sins into branches Usque ad circumstant â—arum minutias fractions atomes I weigh the nature and extent thereof I put thereunto every material circumstance I lanch forth into the depth of my lewd life and having nothing before but the open air and vast sea no haven no station and the further I enter into this Labyrinth the more I lose my self and the more diligent I am to number sins the more numberless I find them and after all my travel in this disquisition Haerebam inter Saxum sacrum nec alius tandem exitus reperiebatur quà m desperatio Calv. instit l. 3. c. 4. Sect. 17. my conscience is not quieted my Audit is not perfect therefore much suspect I shall not have my quietus est at the Priests hands such thoughts as these must needs present themselves to that soul whose conscience is kept awake Furthermore it is required of all penitents to use such diligence Diligentem excussionem vocant quam in rebus gravioribus ordinariè homines adhibere solent Bellar. l. 3. de Poenit. c. 16. to keep their sins in memory against the times of Confession as usually they do about such important affaires as otherwise much concern them and here arise new doubts and discontent in the mind whereby a Penitent is jealouâ— he hath not done his devoire especially when he calls to mind what diligence he hath shewed in accomplishing secular ends how careful he is in the things of this life studious of his preferment watchful to prevent dangers painful to augment his store provident in laying up for his posterity all which matched with the diligence he hath used on this behalf what restless perturbations ensue herein I took not time enough I used not industry enough I let slip many sins through negligence and forgat more through my carelesness and shall such negligent forgetfulness be excused I said above what Beatus Rhenanus related from a Divine of much experience concerning the impossibility of confession let us hear him further about the perplexity and torture thereof Many religious Carthusians and Franciscans were very conversant with him Ver ille magno rerum usu praeditus à Carthusianis Franciscanis intervischatur ab his discebat quibus tormentis quorundam piae meates affligerentur ob confessionem cui satisfacere ut ipsis videbatur nequirent similes querelas ad eum deferebaat sanctimoniales proindè motus fuerat ut libellum ederet in lingua Germanica cui titulâ—m fecit VON DEM BEICHTUNAH hoc est de morho Confessionis quo negabant esse tristiorâ—m qui eo tenebantur Eâ—at Carthusianus quidam qui propter confessionâ—m quae ei semper ob inexplicabilem c rcumstantiarum vim imperfecta videbatur sed ipse perfectissimam esse frustrà contendebat huc miseriarum venerat ut omnem salutem desponderet 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cogitaret hujusmodi homines illi libuit eo libâ—llo consolari B. Rhenan praef ad Tert. l. de Poenit. from them he perceived with what torments well-disposed people were afflicted about confession which scruples as it seemed unto them thâ—y could not satisfie the like complaint did the (a) We call them Nuns being for the most part Nonariae of whom the Poet Multùm gaudere paratus Si Cynico baâ—bam petulans Nonaria vellat Pers Sat. Vestal Virgins and Votaries make unto him whereupon he was moved to publish a Treatise in the German tongue which he entituled VON BEICHTUNAH that is the disease of Confession than which those that were visited with the same confessed none to be more grievous There was a certain Carthusian all long of confession which by reason of the unexplicable violence of circumstances appeared to him as imperfect although he did his best endeavour to perfect the same all he could who was driven to that wretched exigence as to despair of salvation and contrive his own death by affamishment such distressed persons he was pleased to relieve in that Treatise A sight whereof I have much desired but could
God and in that respect may all other sins be venial too as capable of Divine mercy So venial sin hath no prerogative that way nor may for that cause be justly exempted from auricular Confession For reserved cases wherin sins of the greater magnitude are made over to the Pope and whereby they shut up the kingdom of heaven before men without being opened by a golden key we have little to say save considering the great expences tedious journies continual delaies whereby much treasure was exhausted forth of this Land and many of the better sort of the Inhabitants made slaves we are to bless our God that this Antichristian yoke is cast off the tyrannie overthrown and our selves delivered from a more than Egypâ—ian servitude And while the matter was proposed and scan'd at Trent Rom non esse perspicuae veritatis à nullo Patrum mentionem ejus factam immò Durandum Gersoneni Cajetanum magni nominis viros affirmare non peccata sed censuras modò Pontificis judicio reservatas Colonienses Theologi affirmantes neminâ—m ex antiquis Scriptoribus reservationis mâ—minisse nisi in casu publicorum peccatorum certè haereticos eos accusare tanquâ—m pecuniarum aucupes Hist Concil Trid. l. 4. p. 283. the Divines of Lovain objected that it was not a point of evident verity mentioned not by one of the Fathers that Duâ—and Gerson and Cajâ—tan affirmed not sins but censures to be resâ—rved for Papal Judicature The Divines of Colen added how none of the ancient Writers mentioned Reservation but in case of publick sins and that the Hereticks would for certaine accuse them for contriving how to squeeze and empty mens purses and coffers So then if those men that stand so much for detection of all sins unto the Priest have made so bold as to cut off the two extremes vâ—z the greatâ—st and the least offences I see no reason but that we may use the like liberty Auricular's Câ—nsâ—ssiâ— prout in Ecclâ—sia Rom. usurpatur niâ—â—l sâ—rè â—st â—l uâ— qâ—â—m â—â—â—â—culâ—m ad hominâ—m sâ—creta arcana â—xâ—isâ—â—nda artificiosè contextam Quod quidâ—m non sit ut aegrès Mâ—dâ—cina vulâ— ratis câ—nsciâ—ntiis opobâ—lsâ—â—â—â— contritis solâ—tium solidum adhiberi possâ—t 〈◊〉 ut auâ—um argâ—ntum in lè conflâ—nâ—uâ— omâ—iaâ— ad ipsoâ—um lucâ—um convertantur Mason de Minister Anglic. lib. 5. c. 12. but upon far more likely and better reasons I shall conclude these exceptions with the saying of an able Divine at home Auricular Confession as it is used in the Church of Rome is almost nothing else but a Net artificially woven to fish after and comprehend the secret and hidden things of men nor is it so used as to afford Physick to the diseased or pretious balme for wounded consciâ—nces or sure comfort for broken and contrite hearts but thereby to compass Gold and Silver and to convert all into their own purses There are some Stories or rather superstitious Lies as Sir Tho Mâ—ore calls them devised to uphold this doctrine The one is of a Woman who having committed adultery could never in eleven years space be brought to utter the same in any Confession Two Priests whereof one was the Popes Penitentiary and another as holy as he Ad quamlibet expressionem unius pâ—â—cati Buho exibat de ore ejus Illi Bubones cum uno alio majoris enoâ—mioris formae turmâ—tâ—m ingrâ—ssâ— sunt in os mâ—licris ventrem coming into those parts and both being in the Church about their Priestly affaires the woman approached to the Penitentiary to be shriven at every sin she confessed the other Priest standing within view but not within hearing saw an Owle flutter out of her mouth and after the flight of many Owles she stopped it seemeth at her concealed sin and was no sooner absolved of the rest confessed by her and risen up then the same Priest saw all those Owles reenter into her mouth with another more ugly than any of the former The Priests proceeding onwards in their journey the one told unto the other what he saw The Penitentiâ—ry guessed that the woman had kept back some sin in Confession Spec. exâ—mplor d. 9. Sect. 31. Quo libro miraculorum monstra saepiùs quà m vera miracula legas Can. loc Theol l. 11. c. 6. pag. 540. Dist 3. Sect. 46. De omnibus pâ—ccatis quae modò protuli et quae non protuli culpabilem mâ— fateor coâ—am Deo vobis he returned therefore but at his return found her suffocated and dead to whom her soul appear'd tortured in a fearful manner and all for burying of that sin in silence and being questioned by the Penitentiary for what sins those of her sex were usually damned For Fornication said she wanton dressing and Painting and for shame in not confessing Hereby it is intimated that Confession en partie is of no validity and one sin concealed hinders all the rest from pardon But another Woman though faulty in the same kind yet had better success of whom the relation passeth thus She was otherwise very religious but in her younger dayes had fallen into a sin of that nature as she could not for shame utter the same unto the Priest but used to conclude Of all the sins which I have opened or not I confess my self to be guilty before God and you and could never be brought to specifie the same after her death and before her burial she revived and spake to this effect that she had committed one sin which for shame she could not confess but with many tears was wont to utter the same before the Altar and image of the blessed Virgin Coram ipsius altari vel imagine and desire her intercessions that she might not be damned for this concealed sin and told withall that after her death she was seised on by evill spirits Constituit in S. ecclesia nominem sine confessione salvari posse but rescued by the blessed Virgin and by her means to her Son restored from death to life to confess and be assoyled of that sin which was no sooner performed but she again yielded up the ghost Here three Popish tenets are confirmed at one blow 1. necessity to confess every sin 2. worshiping of Saints and 3. before Images and their Altars As this woman made her confession at the blessed Virgins altar so Gregory Turonensis relateth that Clotharius King of France confessed his sins at Saint Martins shrine Clotharius ad Sepulcrum Sancti Martini cunctas actiones quas fortassè negligenter egerat replicans orans cum grandi gemitu ut pro suis culpis B. Confessor Domini misericordiam exoraret Hist lib. 4. Sect. 21. and became an earnest suiter to that Confessor to become a mean for mercy for him but whether Saint Martin took that course with that Prince as the blessed Virgin did with her penitent to send him back after death to be shriven by a Priest or tendred
manifestè ostendit quis esset Irenae l. 5. adv hae cap. 7. and manifestly discover who he was And Chrysostome observeth that hereby Chrâ—st shewed himself to be God equal to his Father otherwise he would have said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrys hom 29. in Matth. why do you attribute unto me an unfitting opinion I am far from that power And proved himself further to be God because he saw their thoughts and by many passages of holy writ it is evident that God onely beholdeth what man beareth in mind Insomuch that as none but God can know the thoughts of men 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theoph in Mar. 2.5 Athan. orat 3. contr Arrian so none but he can forgive the sins of men the like collection maketh his Scholar and abridger Theâ—phylact upon Mark 2.5 And Athanasius maketh this power to forgive sin not the least of his arguments to prove Christ to be God A truth that shined so clearly in the Fathers dayes that it was not altogether overcast when the Schoolmen sate at the sterne Peter Lombards conclusion is Solus Deus maculam peccati abstergit à debito mortis aeternae absolvit Lib. 4. dist 18. Obligationem culpae solus Dominus solet valet dissolvere Rich. de Clavib cap. 3. God alone washeth away the spot of sin and absolveth from the debt of eternal death and Richardus who gives the Priests more than their due herein abridgeth not God of his but confesseth how God onely is wont and able to dissolve the obligation of sin that 's a reserved case in a point then confessed on all hands we will make no longer stay Assertion 2 The Priest substituted by God and in his name absolveth from sin 1. applicativè 2. and dispositivè first Priest absolves applicativè dispositivè by applying unto the Penitent the promises of the Gospel and assurance of pardon And how welcome the Messengers of peace are a distressed Conscience can best declare to whom these Doves after an inundation of sin and sorrow are ever accepted with olive branches in their mouthes Although Christ the good Samaritan putteth wine and oyle of pardon into our wounded hearts by the finger of the holy Ghost yet great comfort we receive in the further assurance thereof plighted by the Ministery of a godly Priest A discreet word is the physician of a languishing soul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 inquit ille ego etiam dixerim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quod in corporis morbis usu evenit ut qui se sentit jam convalescere magnoperè praeterea audito peritoâ—um Medicorum judicio confirmetur Bez. de Excom contr Erastum said he but I say of a soul in health which is seen usually in bodily diseases where a man sensible of his own recovery is much confirmed therein upon the hearing of the judgment of skilful Physicians Great was the consolation David felt upon those words of Nathan The Lord hath put away thy sin heâ—ce ariseth the first sense and apprehension of spiritual joy for remission of sin and the acceptation of a sinners person in the beloved are in God actiones immanentes nihil ponunt in subâ—ecto actions alwayes inherent in God without any touch in the penitent as Paul was a chosen vessel long before he was cleansed and knew not so much till Ananias gave him some light thereof but are then transient and sensible when the Minister brings news thereof to a sinner that repenteth 1. Cor. 5.18 19 God in Christ hath reconciled the world unto himself quantùm ad rei veritatem truly and really and he hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation Quoad veritatis evidentiam to evidence and make known the same by the due application thereof unto a contrite heart There cannot be a greater thing committed to the Priests charge and peoples comfort than 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Ministery of Reconciliation From Christ we come whose Ambassadours we are and unto you sinners now in hostility with him and our instructions are to conclude a peace and reconcile you unto him Good God! how highly doth Paul magnifie his office 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Oecumen in 2 Cor. 5. pag. 639. for Christs sake saith he are we Ambassadours for we have taken his business upon us in Christs stead therefore are we sent unto you as if the Father by us did exhort you who not only exhorted you by Christ but he being crucified doth by us still exhort as the Greek Scholia paraphrase upon the place thus do Priests forgive that is apply the gracious promises of the Gospel unto the penitent Quis potest peccata dimittere nisi solus Deus qui per eos quoque dimittit quibus dimittendi exhibuit potestatem Ambros lib. 5. Expos in Luc. for who saith Ambrose can forgive sins but God alone yet doth he forgive by them also to whom he hath given power to forgive Quamvis Dei proprium opus sit remittere peccata dicuntur etiam Apostoli remittere non simpliciter sed quia adhibent media per quae Deus remittit peccata haec autem media sunt verbum Dei Sacramenta Ferus in Joan. 20. And to this purpose Ferus Although it be Gods proper work to forgive sin yet the Apostles are said to remit also not simply but because they apply those means whereby God remitteth sins which are his Word and Sacraments and this is the first manner after which Priests remit sins by way of application The second sense wherein the Minister of the Gospel absolveth from sin is dispositivè Remittit maculam peccati dispositivè in quantum suo Ministerio assistit virtus divina quae peccata remittit Sum Angel verb. Claves n. 5. as an instrument fitting and preparing by divine helps and means a sinners heart so as God in Christ Jesus may be merciful unto him and so the sin is cancelled by the Ministery of the Priest or rather by divine virtue assisting therein for we are not to imagine that these choice graces salvation and remission of sins are promiscuously thrown open unto all that indeed were to cast pearls before swine (a) Donaâ—â— scit perdore nâ—scit contâ—ary to Oâ—ho Tacit. hiâ—tor lib. 1. God knoweth how to give not how to cast away his jewels The Covenant of grace requiring some conditions to be performed on our part for we read of two exceptions 1. except ye repent 2. except ye believe Now unto both of these doth a Priest by the power of his Ministery render a sinner well disposed Luke 13.3 John 3.3 For the first Peters Sermon wrought so effectually upon the peoples hearts Acts 2.37 38. that they were pricked therewith and said uâ—to him and the rest of the Apostles Men and brethren what shall we do Then Peter said unto them Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of
videbatur Hieron lib. 7. in Esay c. 23. neither making him that had the Leprosie unclean or him clean that was cleared thereof but onely declared him to be polluted saith Saint Hierom who before seemed unto many to have been clean Now because Ministerial and subordinate causes work in the power and strength of the superiour and principal the effect ofttimes is ascribed unto them who have the least finger in the business and thus much to the first point For the second the Priests sentence on earth is onely at such times ratified in heaven Non sequitur Deus Ecclesiae judicium quae per surreptioneÌ„ ignorantiam saepè judicat Lomb. l. 4. dist 18. when it proceeds according to heavenly directions God leaving such judgments in the Church gained by surreption or ignorance unto themselves It being a received maxim that as the Judge of all the world cannot do otherwise but right no more can or will he approve of any censure but what is just and righteous that of Saint Augustine being true in this case also that thing cannot be unjust wherewiâ—h the just God is pleased Injustum esse non potest quod placuit justo Aug. Qui scit illum intelligere potest non nisi grande aliquod bonum à Nerone damnatum Tertul. Apologet. c. 5. And as the most ancient and learned of the Latin Fathers said of Nero The man that hath any knowledge of him cannot but understand that it was some great good that Nero condemned So contrarywise those to whom the justice and goodness of God is known cannot be ignorant but that the cause must of necessity be good and just which he approveth and bad withall which he distasteth Either suppose then the Priests sentence on earth to proceed alwayes according to equity else not alwayes to be ratified in heaven In the third doubt there sticks a little difficulty how binding and loosing on earth can precede and go before that which is in heaven for those Fathers cannot be ignorant whose Deputy the Priest is and by virtue of whose commission he proceedeth That God absolveth upon contrition of the heart Non solùm piissimâ dispensatione Leprosi antequam ad Sacerdotes venirent in via mundati sunt ut ipsi mundatorem suum cegnoscerent Sacerdotes nihil horum mundationi se contulisse sentirent juxta verò spiritualem intelligentiam Leprosi antequam ad Sacerdotes veniant mundantur quia non Sacerdotes sed Deus peccata dimittit Haymo Dominic 14. post Pentecost pag. 401. Omnes concedunt quòd per contritionem veram sufficientem peccatum remittitur sine Sacramento in actu Gabriel l. 4. dist 14. Quaest 2. and where contrition is not the Priest absolveth but in vain That as the Lepers were cleansed in the way in going to shew themselves unto the Priests so sin is no sooner repented of but instantly the sinner by God is pardoned how can then this Ministerial absolution take place of that powerful one of God For answer whereunto these conditions must be premised 1. The sinner that stands in need of Priestly absolution hath his conscience perplexed and not quieted 2. The sinner before the Priest hath done his office conceiveth hope onely of pardon from God but no full assurance But 3. upon the Priests application of mercy from the word of God he receiveth comfort his conscience is quieted and he rests assured of forgiveness And to these we must premise again for our better understanding that many persons are members of Christ in election onely as Paul before his conversion 2. Many in election and pâ—eparation as Saint Augustine a Catechumen Membrum Christi 3. 1 praedestinatione 2 praeparatione 3 concorporatione Rich. de Clav. c. 20. Corde credens devotione fervens ad baptisma fâ—stinavit believing in his heart and fervent in devotion he made haste to be baptized 3. And many in election preparation and admission as reconciled penitents by ablution and absolution This priority then is not in respect of Gods election or preparation for mercy but in respect of the actuall and complete admission of the Penitent into his grace and his sensible remonstrance thereof for as the Divine purpose to save a Penitent was from eternity so to remit his sins also but in respect of the sinners first feeling and apprehension of mercy Gods goodness intended unto him by the Priests Ministery being reduced into the outward act Forgiveness may be first resolved upon in heaven but first felt and apprehended on earth Rom. 5.10 When we were enemies we were reconciled to God saith the Apostle who was himself a Persecutor and yet reconciled to God and by him whom he then persecuted quoad veritatâ—m but he reapâ—d not the fruit thereof was not sensible of this reconciliation quoad patefactionem salutarem â—jus communicationem in respect of the manifestation and saving communication thereof till his Conversion Now in râ—gâ—rd a thing is said first to be when it is first taken notice of so a Penitent is then said to be fiâ—st absolved when the Priest maketh known the benefit and the sinner groweth first sensible and communicateth thereof which because a sinner upon earth first apprehendeth and God in his heavenly word alloweth of that apprehension it remaineth that in this sense those sayings of the Fathers are to be allowed of and thus much for the clearing of those doubtâ— The premisses considered the distinction is easily made betwixt the power of absolution which God exerciseth by himself and by his servant for from God is the Primitive and original power the Apostles power is meerly derived that in God Soveraign this in the Apostles dependent Ministri peccata remittunt non 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in him onely absolute in them delegate in him imperial in them Ministerial Nor do the Bishops and Clergie forgive sins by any absolute power of their own for so onely Christ their Master forgiveth but ministerially as the servants of Christ and Stewards to whose fidelity their Lord and Master hath committed his keys and that is Pract. of Piety pag. 758. when they do declare and pronounce either privately or publickly by the word of God what bindeth what looseth and the mercies of God to penitent sinners and his judgments to impenitent and obstinate persons They then do remit sins because Christ by their Ministery remitteth sins as Chrâ—st by his Disciples loosed Lazarus John 11.44 And the Ancients have made the raising and loosing of Lazarus and the cleansing and admitting of the Lepers into the Camp a Type of the power residing in God and of the authority he hath given unto man And as Christ by his power made Lazarus alive and the Apostles onely loosing his bonds set him free so it is the grace of God which revives and justifies a sinner The Priests publishing his liberty whom the son of man hath made free In like manner the cleansing of
the use of the Church Power of absolution conferred and confined unto Priests Laicks using the same not in case of office but necessity and where they are the parties grieved Bonds of the soul and sin onely loosed by this key The accomplishment and actual donation of this power God remitteth by the Churches act The form of Priestly ordination Heresie of the Novatians denying in the Church power to reconcile Penitents Seed and bellows thereof austerity of those times Absolution in the Priest not absolutely efficacious but as relating to conditions in the Penitent the Priest not secured from failing in the act of absolution The erring key Priestly absolution declarative and demonstrative and in a moral sense energetical Judgments forinsecal are applied declarations of the Law to the fact Absolution a Ministerial act but powerful and judicial but not Soveraign nor despotical The spirit of judgment to discerne and determine how necessary for Priests in the act of absolution Fathers making Priests Judges of the Conscience The exercise of the keys 1. In the word of reconciliation 2. In prayer ancient formes of absolution expressed in a deprecative manner not indicative 3. In the Sacraments 4. In interdictions and relaxations of publick Censures Keys abused at Rome Dangerous to Soveraign Majesties and Republicks The superciliousness of Roman Priests in Usurping upon Divine right subjecting the power of forgiveness in God to their arbitrements Their preposterous way in absolving first and afterwards in enjoyning Penance The feigned virtue of absolution Ex opere operato destructive of piety and penitency Conditions requâ—site in the Penitent to be relieved by the keys and lawfull use of absolution 3. Persons Tibi dabo IN the next place it comes to be considered who the persons are to whom this Commission is directed the Trustees to whose charge this power is deposited Some throw it open too far extending it to all Christians which if so what need of special offices and functions in the Church He gave saith the Apostle some Apostles Ephes 4.11 some Prophets and some Evangelists and some Pastors and Teachers Now if all are Pastors and all Teachers then not some and if some are Apostles and some Prophets then not all Others shrink it up and confine it unto Peter or if to his Successors such as they appoint entailing it upon those that sit in the Chaire at Rome But if none but that Chaire be Apostolical Hoc modo Ecclesiae Apostolicae census suos deserunt sicut Smyrnaeorum ecclesia babens Polycarpum à Joanne conlocatum resert sicut Romanorum Clementem à Petro ordinatum edit Teâ—t adverâ— haeres praescript cap. 32. Christus Apostolis omnibus post resurrectionem suam parem potestatem tribuâ—t Cypr. de unit eccles Universam signisicabat ecclesiam Aug. tr 124. in Joan. Ecclesia quae fundatur in Christo claves ab eo regni coelorum accepit in Petâ—o i. e. potestatem ligandi solvendique peccata Id. Tertullian was mistaken in affirming the Chaire of Polycarpus at Smyrna to be Apostolical and instituted by John as well as the châ—ire of Clemens at Rome ordained by Peter and Cyprian in writing how Christ after his Resurrection bestowed the power upon all the Apostles and Saint Augustine that Peter at that time represented the whole Church and againe the Church founded upon Christ received the keys of the kingdome of heaven that is the power of binding and loosing by Peter And Theophylact All they have the power of remitting and binding that have obtained the sacred function of a Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theoph. in Matth. 16. p 94. Paris 1635. as well as Peter for albeit it was said unto Peter onely I will give to thee yet the keys were given to all the Apostles It is the Inheritance of the Church to whose use Peter was seised of these keys and the power executed by all that succeed in the function of Priesthood nor can Peter boast herein to have been anointed with any oyl above his fellows But withall as this oyl descended from Aarons beard to the skirts of his garment so it condescendeth no further for omni soli sacerdoti to all the Priests and to them onely is this authority conferred and confined To this parpose the Oracle of our Divines Bishop Andrews resolveth Serm. of Absolution the Apostles to be three wayes considerable 1. as Christians in general so it was said unto them Vigilate watch 2. or else as Preachers Ministers Priests so it was said Ite praedicate hoc facite Go and preach and Do this Mark 13. ult c. 3. or lastly as Apostles and so personally They were to be witnesses of his miracles and Resurrection Now the power of absolution was not peculiar to them as Apostles nor common as Christians but committed to them as Preachers Ministers Priests and consequently to those that in that function and office do succeed them yet not so committed unto them as if God could not work without them for Gratia Dei non alligatur mediis the grace of God is not bound but free can work without means of Word or Sacrament or Ministers either but ordinarily this is an Ecclesiastical act or course by him established the Ministery of reconcâ—liation to Ecclesiastical persons And if God at any time vouchsafeth by Lay-men that are not such they are Ministri necessitatis non officii in case of necessity Ministers but by office not so Hitherto are Mentis aureae verba bracteata the grave resolves of that learned Prelate at the feet of this Gamaliel we sit and take these Dictates 1. The Apostles received power to absolve as Priests and Ministers of the Gospel and so those that succeed them in that calling 2. That God can and doth remit sins by himself immediately without any subordinate means at all 3. That this power conferred upon Ministers is an ordinary and Ecclesiastical act 4. And that Lay men taking unto themselves this power are Ministers in case of necessity onely and not usual nor called to that office Hereupon saith Ambrose This right is onely permitted unto the Priests Jus hoc solis permissum est Sacerdotibus rectè igitur ecclesia vendicat quae veros Sacerdotes habet Ambr. de Poen l. 1. c. 3. therefore the Church may truly pretend thereunto that hath true Priests The Church then includeth Priests and Priests absolution The poor Christians in the Vandalick persecution were sensible hereof for when the Orthodox Clergie were exiled by the Arrians the People casting themselves at their feet Victor Uticens lib. 2. cried out To whom will you leave us wretches while you go forward to your Crown Who shall Christen these sucklings in the font of the everlasting water Who shall impart unto us the benefit of penance by reconciling and indulgence absolving us from the bands of our sins The Laity could not be in such distress if the grace of absolution had not been inherent in
the sinner and fidelity in the Priest that absolution may be efficacious Now as the sinner is not ever contrite and penitent in shriving no more is the Priest ever faithfull and infallible in pardoning the sentence of the Priest is then in force when grounded upon Gods word and treads the footsteps of the Judge eternal whatsoever sins ye remit that is after the form of the Church Quorum remiseritis peccata scilicet in formâ— Ecclesiae clave non errante remittuntur Bonav in Joan. 29. p. 20. Tom. 1. p. 417. Mogunt 1609. Hoc tamen intelligendum est quando judicium Ecclesiae divino judicio conformatur Lyra in Joan. 10. Supposito hîc in terra debito usu clavis Deus illud approbat in coelis aliter non Idem in Matth. cap. 16. and not with an erring key are remitted saith their Seraphical Bâ—naventure and Lyra limits the confirmation to just proceedings on earth sins are remitted and retained in heaven when the judgment of the Church is conformable to Divine judgment And again Vpon supposition of the true use of the keys God approves thereof in heaven otherwise not And these Caveats need not be entred if the Priest could not mistake herein And Richardus observing the words that they are not whatsoever thou hast a will to bind on earth Non dicit quodcunque volueris ligare sed qâ—odcunque ligaveris Ligat itaque absolvit sacerdotis sententia justa neutrum verò Sacerdotis sententia injusta Rich. de Clavibus cap. 11. but whatsoever thou shalt bind deduceth from thence that it lies not in the Priests pleasure to bind whom he thinks good but as he findâ— just cause and concludeth A just sentence from the Priest bindeth and lâ—oseth whereas the unjust sentence of the Priest is a meer nullity The Scâ—oolmen are seconded by the Canonists As the Mâ—nister or instrument hath no efficacy in operation but as moved by the principal Agent Sicut Minister instrumentum non habet efficaciam in agendo nisi secundum quod movâ—ntur à Principali Agente sic Sacerdos cùm operatur per istas claves instrumentaliter si utitur istis clavibus secundum proprium arbitrium dimittens rectitudinem divinae monitionis peccat Sum. Angel verb. Claves nu 4. Sacerdoti non licet his clavibus uti pro libito suae voluntatis quia cùm operetur ut instrumentum Dei divinam motionem sequi debet aliter peccat Barthol Armill aur verb. Claves n. 6. So the Priest who worketh by those keyes instrumentally If he use these keys after his own appetite and shall omit the just monition of God sinneth saith one of that rank and another much to that purpose It is not lawful for the Priest to use the keys as he please for seeing he worketh as an instrument of God he ought to follow the divine motion else he is out Now what need these Cautions and restrictions that the Priest must be directed by divine monitions if this instrument were infallibly moved by the virtue of the first agent and that advise to follow the divine motion if the keys in his hand were ever and undoubtedly swayed to the right wards These prescriptions are jealous of some eccentricities in the motion of these inferiour orbs and of some tamperings in these lower keys This unanimous consent of School-men and Canonists in this point whether it proceed from the beams of Divine truth or for that they would not throw open the Popes prerogative in Common whom they hold onely to be infallible I cannot say But it may safely be concluded Absolution to be then onely in force when matters are carried with right judgment and no errour committed in the use of the keys 3. Absolution declarative The third property that Absolution from the Priest is declaratory that is not absolving so much as pronouncing a Penitent from God to be absolved As the two Apostles having healed the lame man and the people filled with wonder and amazement had recourse unto them to do them honour they professed that it was not their power and holiness that had made that man whole but that the name of Christ Acts 2.10 12 16. through faith iâ— his name had made that man strong as very shie and fearful of Sacriledge in concealing the theft of Divine honours which the peoples opinion had stollen for them So it is not the holiness or power of the Priest and Minister that remitteth sin but God in the Name and Faith of Christ Jesus The Priest is an Herald making intimation thereof his absolution is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in his own right pardoning but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 demonstrative onely as a special officer of the King of mercy And as Gemini an old Astronomer delivered of the constellations in heaven that they are not the causes of rain winds tempests c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Genimi Isag Astron p. 36. apud Petavii 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But because observation found such accidents usually coming to pass upon the Cosmical and Acronical rising and setting of such asterismes such effects were ascribed unto them whereas they were not causes thereof but indications giving notice that the times and seasons were now come when such effects come to pass That which the Priest doth is to dispose the Penitent and by the word upon probable signs of sorrow to absolve him which absolution is not a proper act of forgiveness of sin no more then he that brings the Princes pardon can be said to pardon the Delinquent nor hath it any direct necessary or Physical influence in forgiveness of sin but he is onely causa moralis seu concilians whereupon God is said to pardon the Penitent when he seeth him humbled And as a Messenger of the Princes pardon is a mean whereby the prisoner is actually discharged and causa sine qua non a cause without whose message by him deliverâ—d the offender had been still a captive and perhaps executed So oftentimes the Minister is a cause though not of pardoning yet of freeing the sinner and though not of remission yet of the sense and feeling thereof by applying the mercy of God without which the poor sinner might peradventure have been swallowed up of grief Although then the Priests absolution be declarative yet it is not so jejune and leaden as many therefore imagine the same to be for what else are all Juridical sentences determinations and judgments in all kind of laws but the application of a point in law to a matter in fact and a declaration what the thing questioned then is in law and what justice either assertive or vindictive belongeth thereunto Now because the Judge is nothing else but the speaking law and his judgment an applied declaration thereof shall his sentence be therefore infirm because he judgeth according to law or shall the Priests absolution be the less respected because it is grounded upon Gods word denounced in
his Lords name and applied by his special direction The place wherein they serve is a Stewards place and the Apostle telleth them 1 Cor. 4.2 that it is required in stewards that they be faithful They may not therefore behave themselves like the unjust Steward Luke 17.7 8. presuming to strike out their Masters debt and put less in the place without his direction and contrary to his liking 2 Cor. 5.20 Ambassadors they are for Christ and must be careful to follow their Masters instructions and not to intrench upon soveraign points as to imagine the power of proclaiming war or concluding peace lay at their devotion this indeed were not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to exceed their Commission and upon the matter to subject themselves to the danger of the law and their proceedings to be vacated and made of none effect The Master of the Sentences resolveth this power to consist not in binding or in loosing Sacerdotibus tantùm tribuit potestatem solvendi ligandi i. e. ostendendi homines ligatos vel solutos In Levitico se ostendere Sacerdotibus jubentur Leprosi quos illi non faciunt leprosos vel mundos sed discernunt qui mundi vel immundi sunt hi ergo peccata remittunt vel retinent dum dimissa à Deo vel retenta indicant ostendunt Lomb. l. 4. dist 18. Sect. non autem but in shewing forth onely who are bound and who are loosed and produceth the authority of Saint Hierome to maintain his resolution that as in the Levitical law the Lepers were commanded to present themselves unto the Priests whom they made neither clean nor unclean but discerned who were so and concludeth that Evangelical Priests remit and retain sins when they discover and shew forth what sins by God are retained or remitted Lombard is followed by Occam The Priests bind or loose in shewing men to be bound or loosed Sacerdotes ligant solvunt quia ostendum homines ligatos solutos Occ. l. 4. Q. 8 9. Non quòd homo propriè remittat peccatum sed quòd ostendat certificet à Deo remissum neque enim aliud est absolutio quam ab homine accipis quà m si dicat En sili certifico te tibi remissa esse peccata annuntio tibi te habere propitium Deum quaecunque Christus in baptismo Evangelio promisit tibi nunc per me annunciat promittit Ferus in Matth. 9. edit Mogunt 1559. And they both by Ferus Not that any man properly remitteth sin but that he sheweth and certifieth from God that it is remitted for the absolution thou receivest from man is nothing else then as if he should say Behold my son I certifie unto thee thy sins to be forgiven I declare unto thee that thou hast a merciful God and look whatsoever Christ in baptisme or in the Gospel hath promised unto us he now by me declareth and promiseth unto thee And with this pregnant testimony we conclude this property The last property to be inquired Whether Ministerial and Judicial If the act of this absolution be Ministerial or Judicial and my answer is both ministerial and judicial per partes to be demonstrated For the first It cannot be otherwise no effect exceeding the virtue of its cause and no property transcending the nature of its subject If therefore our calling be ministerial so is every office and act thereof And let none of that order distaste the name for Jesus Christ was a minister of Circumcision Rom. 13.8 and the Apostle styles himself a Minister of the Gospel Colos 1.23 1 Tim. 4.6 and Timothy a consecrated Bishop a good Minister of Jesus Christ Away then with all contemptuous thoughts 2 Cor. 3.6 Heb. 1.7 for God hath made his Ministers a flame of fire able Ministers and of the Spirit Ministers of the Spirit and graces thereof amongst whom remission of sin is not the meanest and not Lords Therefore before they were habilitated for remission of sins our Lord is said to breathe upon them and say Receive the Holy Ghost for this is not the gift of man saith Ambrose neither is he given by man Non humanum hoc opus neque ab homine datur sed invocatus à Sacerdote à Deo traditur in quo Dei munus Ministerium Sacerdotis est Paulus Apostolus in tantum se huic officio imparem credidit ut à Deo nos spiritu optaret impleri Quis tantus est qui hujus traditionem muneris sibi audeat arrogare itaque Apostolus votum precatione detulit non jus authoritate aliqua vendicavit impetrare optavit non imperare praesumpsit Ambr. l. 1. de Spiâ—itu S. cap. 7. but being called upon by the Priest is given by God wherein the gift of God is the Ministery of the Priest Paul the Apostle held himself so far unmeet for this office that he rather prayed we should be filled with the Spirit of God what man hath so highly coâ—ceited of himself as to arrogate the collation of this gift The Apostle therefore made his request by prayer and challenged no right by authority choosing rather to intreat and not presuming to command Ministers then we are and suppliants on the peoples behalf that they may receive power from above and not Lords or commanders of the Spirit of Grace The same Father also informeth us saying Behold how sins are forgiven by the Holy Ghost Ecce quia per Spiritum peccata donantur homines autem in remissione peccatorum ministerium suum exhibent non jus alicujus potestatis exercent neque enim in suo sed in Patris Filii Spiritûs Sancti nomine peccata dimittuntur isti rogant Divinitas donat humanum enim obsequium sed munificentia supernae est potestatis Ambr. l. 3. de Spirit S. cap. 19. but men exhibit their Ministery in the remission exercising no right or faculty of any power for sinnes are not forgiven in their name but in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost They intreat but the Deity bestoweth the obsequiousness is from man the bounty from an higher power and thus much for the Ministerial part Whether judicial For the second I have cast my self into divers cogitations why this office of absolution should be denied to be a judicial act Is it because declarative The like exception lieth against all civil judgments Judicium est definitio ejus quod est justum which are declarations what Law is in particular cases or is it because the Priest may erro in his declaratory sentence and that laies hold of a Civil Judge likewise who hath lawful authority to judge right yet no assured infallibility that his judgments shall alwayes be right Is it because Ministerial Then exclude all Judges from the Bench that sit there by virtue of an higher power we determine then that
the fault is and what repentance hath followed thereupon that such as Almighty God doth visit with the grace of compunction those the senâ—ence of the Pastor may absolve Greg. And hence it comes to pass that the Fathers erect thrones for these Presbyters making them Judges and honouring their resolves as solemn judgments Saint Austin expounds the thrones Rev. 20.4 and those that sate thereon and the judgment given unto them in the Revelation Non hoc putandum est de ultimo judicio dici sed sedes Praepositorum ipsi praepositi intelligendi sunt per quos ecclesiae nunc gubâ—rnatur Judicium autem datum nullum meliùs accipiendum quà m id quod dictum est Quaecunque ligaveritis c. undè Apostolus Quid enim inquit mihi est de his qui foris sunt judicare nonne de his qui intus sunt vos judicatis Aug. lib. 20. de Civit. Dei cap. 9. not of the last judgment But the seats of the Rulers and the Rulers themselves are understood to be those by whom the Church is now goveâ—ned And the judgment given unto them cannot be taken better than of that which is spoken whose sins soever ye remit c. and the Apostle what have I to do to judge those that are without and do not you judge of those that are within And Saint Chrysostome extols the same far above the glittering pomp of earthly Tribunals Although the Kings Throne seem unto us majestical for the precious stones dazling therein and the gold wherewith it is beset 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrys 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tom. 5. p. 152. But withall the administration of earthly things alone comes under the jurisdiction thereof and further authority it hath not whereas the Pâ—iests throne is seated in heaven and matters thence are turned over to their decision And Saint Hierome having the keys of the kingdome of heaven they judge after a sort before the day of judgment Qui claves Regni coelurum habentes quodammodo ante diem judicii judicant Hierom. ad Heliod Ecce non solùm de semetipsis securi sunt sed etiam alienae obligationis potestatem relaxationis accipiunt principatumque superni judicii sortiuntur ut vice Dei quibusdam peccata retineant quibusdam relaxent Greg. supâ—à And Saint Gregory Behold they are not onely secured on their own behalf but receive the power of loosing the bonds from others and obtain a principality of judgment from above that they may in Gods stead retain the sins of some and release the sins of others Either then we must ascribe judgment to the Priests in the Ministery of the keys or else afford but little in this behalf to these Doctors Judges sure they are if these Ancient worthies have any judgment 3. The exercise of the keys We are now come to the exercise of this power which is indeed the very life thereof and this practice is spiritual as the weapons of our warfare are containing the means in the discreet use and application whereof God forgiveth sin and his Minister giveth notice of that forgiveness Dr Field of the Church Book 5. chap. 22. pag. 104. London 1610. Now there are four things in the hand of the Minister as a great Divine of our Church noteth the Word Prayer Sacraments and Discipline by the word of Doctrine he frameth winneth and perswadeth the sinner to repentance and conversion seeking and procuring remission from God By Prayer he seeketh and obtaineth it for the sinner By the Sacraments he instrumentally maketh him partaker as well of the grace of remission as of conversion and by the power of the discipline he doth by way of authority punish evil doers and remit or diminish the punishments he inflâ—cteth according as the Condition of the party may seem to require Thus that judicious man hath reduced the practick of the keys unto four heads and we receiving this method from him shall open them more particularly 1. By the Word The first is the word of Reconciliation and consisteth in the preaching and due applying thereof and the Ministery thereof doth the Apostle specially place as a powerful ordinance 2 Cor. 5.18 John 15.3 whereby a sinner is cleansed from his inâ—quity Now are ye clean through the word I have spoken unto you whereupon Aquinas observeth God to have given us the virtue Dedisse virtutem inspirasse in cordibus nostris ut annuntiemus mundo hanc reconciliationem esse factam per Christum Aquin. in 2 Cor. 5. and to have inspired into our hearts that we should declare unto the world this reconciliation to have been made by Christ Therefore it is called 1. the word of salvation Acts 13.16 2. and the word of his grace Acts 14.3 and the word of promise Rom 9.9 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the word of reconciliation 2 Cor. 5.19 and the word of faith which we preach Rom. 10.8 Insomuch that when Timothy shall rightly divide the word of truth that is 2 Tim. 2.15 promises to whom promises belong and judgment to whom judgment appertaineth and that by preaching of the word instantly 2 Tim. 4.2 and applying the same by way of reproof and exhortation or by private admonition therein he doth the work of an Evangelist and maketh good proof of his Ministery Solvunt eos Apostoli sermone Dei testimoniis Scripturarum exhortatione virtutum Hieron Lib. 6. Comment in Es 14. Remittuntur peccata per Dei verbum cujus Levites interpres quidam executor est Ambr. After this manner did the Apostles loose the cords of sin by the word of God saith Hierome by the testimony of the Scriptures and by exhortations unto virtue And Saint Ambrose sins are remitted by the word of God whereof the Levite was an Interpreter and a kind of Executor And in this sense the Apology of the Church of England acknowledgeth the power of binding and loosing Ministris à Christo datam esse ligandi solvendi aperiendi claudendi potestatem solvendi quidem munus in eo situm esse ut Minister dejectis animis verè resipiscentibus per Evangelii praedicationem merita Christi absolutionem offerat certam peccatorum condonationem ac spem salutis aeternae denunciet c. Apol. Eccles Anglic. of opening and shutting to have been given by Christ unto the Ministers and the power of loosing to consist herein when the Minister by the preaching of the Gospel shall tender the merits of Christ and absolution to dejected spirits and truly penitent and shall denounce unto them an assured pardon of their sins and hope of eternal salvation Luke 11.52 This is that key of knowledge mentioned by our Saviour Matth. 23.13 And as the Jewish Scribes were by him justly reprehended for shutting up
Penance as the Priest imposeth The disorder of Romish penance and pardon And herein is justly râ—prehended that preposterous course observed in the Church of Rome for whereas in the Primitive Church open sinners were put to penance and after due performance thereof they were reconciled and no discharge nor absolution could be expected from the Minister till all reckonings were ended by the Peniteâ—t It is the fashion in this Church to absolve immediately upon confession Hodiè statim à facta confâ—ssione manus poenitâ—nti imponitur ad communionis â—us admittitur post absolutionem opera aliqua pietatis quae ad carnis castigationem reliquiarum peccatorum expurgâ—tionem faciant injunguntur Cassand Consult Art 11. de Confessione and after absolution to impose the penance and so come in with their after reckoniâ—gs And what is this but as some of the Ancients have observed first to loose and afterwards to bind Putting herein as that Ecebolius of the times La Romana perversità pone il carro inami alli Bovi prima concede la remissione poi impone l'opere di penitenza quali dourâ—bbono procedere dal Pentimento cosi molto più precedere la remissione Marc. Anâ—on de Dominis Predica in Londra appresso Gâ—ovanni Billio 1617. and Renegado Spalatio once observed the cart before the horse first conferring pardon and afterwards impose the work of Penance which ought before to proceed from the Penitent and much more to precede Remission But not the least wrong committed against the just use of the keys is in making the absolution of the Priest a Sacramâ—ntal act conferring grace by the work wrought and that absolution issuing from the Priests lips striketh such a stroke Absolution not efficacious ex operato that by virtue thereof attrition doth become contrition As much as if they had said that a sorrow arising from a servile fear of punishment and such a fruitless Repentance as Judas carried to hell with him may by virtue of the Priests absolution bâ—come a godly sorrow working repentance to salvation not to be repented of which must needs proceed from a secret and mysterious kind of operation in the absolution it self when as sorrow conceived upon dread of punishment and that may be found in wicked Cain as well as in righteous Abel shall be changed into such a sorrow as ariseth upon an hatred of sin upon an apprehension of Gods displeasure and his abused mercy that his gifts are slighted and virtuous exercises too much neglected which is a filial sorrow and proper to such which are sealed by the Spirit to the day of adoption It cannot be conceived the great harmes that fall out upon this Spiritual cosenage which flattereth and milketh sinners that although they bring not perfect repentance D'attrito si fâ—cci subito contrito cioé che se bene non há il vero perfetto pentimento d' suoi pâ—ccati má un certo picciolo lâ—ggiero per timor solamâ—nte dâ—l dâ—vin castiâ—o non per odio dei peccato con l'assolutione Egli goda il beneficio della remissione tanto quanto se egli havesse il vero perfetto pentimento col vero odio del peccato Predica supra pag. 47. but a light and small sorrow conceived upon fear of punishment and not upon hatred of sin pieced with absolution they shall obtain remission of sins in as ample manner as if they had brought all the sorrow in the world and their repentance had been as compleat as might be accompanied with a very hatred of sin Is not this to dandle sinners in their evil way And as for that temporal punishment which is supposed to remain for the Priest to inflict and to afflict the sinner either a formal penance or a Papal indulgence shall strike off that likewise A plausible doctrine for those that would live after the flesh that sin may be pardoned without hatred of sin that sorrow in it self imperfect by virtue of another mans help may be perfected That there lies such virtue in absolution as to qualifie persons otherwise indisposed to reap the fruit thereof for what sinner would stand so much upon contrition if attrition would serve the turne or earnestly repent if such a small or crude sorrow might be accepted I may not well stay any longer upon this abusive part of the keys And at the length soit peu soit prou as the French-man speaks be it little or much I have God being my help absolved this point the Ministery of the keys being no small part of our Sacred Function and with what success I had rather the judicious Reader suppose then make the relation my self it being a matter not usually or at least not methodically unfolded by your ordinary writers Conclusion By all this that hath been said you may discerne how powerful and usefull the keys are how far forth they conduce to remission of sin by the act and benefit of absolution promised Matth. 16.19 and accomplished John 20.23 Now little or no use can be made hereof except the sin and inward contrition for the same be discovered by some sensible demonstrations And no sins either for number or greatness are excepted from absolution Christ teacheth us to forgive till seventy times seven which amounteth to (a) 490 times accounting as it ought to be a Jubilee to consist of 49 years not 50. Psal 40.12 Orat. Manasseh Luke 4.27 Qualities requisite in such that desire to be relieved by the benefit of the keys ten Jubilees of pardon and we have example of one whose sins were more in number than the hairs of his head and of another whose were more than the sands of the sea that obtained pardon Yet as Christ saith There were many Lepers in Israel in the time of Elizeus the Prophet and none of them were cleansed save Naaman the Syrian So many sins there be and many sinners there be and none remitted except they be of the Quorum remiseritis by God or the Ministery of his Priests You may perceive by what hath been discoursed that many things are required to remission oâ— sins The Priest may do his devoir yet the absolution may not close except the Penitent stand rightly disposed The party then rightly qualified 1. he must be within the house or family to whom the keys belong for what have Priests to do to judge those that are without It is required then that he be within his jurisdiction that is to say a member of the Church and a believing Christian Exod. 26.34 In the Law the Propitiatory was annexed to the Ark to shew that they must hold of the Ark as Gods people that would be partakers of the propitiation for their sins Remission of sins being sors sanctorum dos ecclesiae the inheritance of the Saints and dowry of the Church 2. Also he that would claim any benefit of the keys must be repentant for in Christ's
observation of the discipline rendred more pious He that truly repenteth Qui agit poenitentiam non solùm diluere lachrymis debet pâ—ccatum suum sâ—d etiam â—mâ—ndationibus factis operire tegere dâ—licta supâ—riora ut nâ—n ei imputâ—tur peccatum ergo tegamus lâ—psus nostros posterieribus factis Amb. l. 2. de Poen c. 5. Satisfactio duplex 1. Propâ—tiatoria pro nostris totius mundi pâ—ccatis Christus est 2. Quam Ecclâ—sia exigâ—t à peccatoribus vindicta â—st quam ex praescripto sacerdotis vâ—lut sâ—iritu â—â—s Medici de nobis sumere debemus commâ—ssis peccatis contraria sacientes Grop de Sâ—cram Poenit. p. 107. Edit Antw. 1556. saith Saint Ambrose ought not onely to wash away his sins with teaâ—s but amends being made to cover and hide his former defects that his offences may not be imputed unto him let us therefore cover our former faults with good deeds following Sound is that distinction of Gropperus 1. there is a propitiatory satisfaction which is Christ Jesus for our sins and the sins of the whole world 2. and there is another which the Church requireth of sinners a Revenge which according to the prescriptions of the Priest our spiritual Physician we ought to take of our selves by performance of holy actions diametrically opposite to the former iniquities whereby the sinner is humbled God is pleased and the Church satisfied and the dregs of sins by the contrary acts of virtue defecated and cleansed Thus much for Theodorus Anno Dom. 740. Egbert Egbert was the next who made Ordinances on this behalf A man who by his birth as Brother to a (b) Egbert King of Northumberland King and by his office an (c) At York Arch-Bishop might well be sufficiently authorized for such proceedings A Penitential was by him prescribed highly esteemed and carefully preserved amongst the huge devastations of Religious houses and Libraries although time had like to have deprived him of the honour of such a work Opus poenitentiale in magno olim fuisse precio post veterum MSS. Codicum insigneÌ„ cladâ—m quae Coenobiorum subsequuta est cataclysim supersunt hodie diversa exemplaria splendidè quidem antiquissimè exarata Spelman Concil pag. 275. and given it to one whose learning and piety might render him suspicious thereof for placed it is at the end of Venerable Bedes works under this Title Canones ad remedia Peccatorum are antidotes for sinful and sorrowful Patients and the Priest as Ghostly Physician is taught well and seriously to advise upon the sex age condition state and person of each penitent Sacerdos Christi sexum aetatem conditionem statum personam cujusque poenitentiam agere volentis ipsum quoque cor poenitentis curiosè discernaâ— nè post stultum Medicum vulnâ—ra animarum siant pejora to distinguish exactly of several maladies to enquire all he may into the heart and inward man and accordingly to administer lest in case he proceed confusedly the wounds in the soul by the Physicians folly prove more dangerous for prevention whereof Non omnibus unâ câdemque librâ pensandum est there followeth a catalogue of sins and oâ— such penances as concern the same holding an equal analogie between the malady and the medicâ—ne the sin and the sorrow And all this not to expiate or satisfiâ— for what hath passed but to exclude and prevent what may follow non pro remissione peccatorum sed pro remedio Poenitentibus atque lugentibus vera medicamenta salutis not for the remission of sin but for remedy against sin for so much they are intituled Excerpta Patrum remedia animarum Râ—ceipts of the Fathers for the souls preservative All which fowre and sharp potions prescribed by the Ancients serve not to justifie but sanctifie real converts For the not imputing the remitting and covering of sin appertain to the righteousness of faith Psal 32.1 Whereof cordial sorrow fasting and chastising of the body almesdeeds c. are the fruits of a good life and evidence of justifying faith Place then such exercises of piety under sanctification and no incroachment will be upon the solemn Sacrifice of our Redemption The like construction charity may put upon all the subsequent testimonies These Canons were decreed about the year of grace 740. at which time Egbert possessed the Chair at York Beda in magna devotione tranquillitate ultimum è corpore spiritum efflavit Flor. Wigorn. ann Dom. 735. Chron. pag. 271. Lond. an 1592. Fasti Regum Episcoporum Angliae ad finem Rerum Anglic. Scriptor Lond. à Dom. H. Savilio editi and for that cause could not be published by Bede dead four years before as Florentius Wigorniensis and the Savilian Fasti testifie A Council celebrated at Calchurch situated as Hollingshed will have it in the Mediterranean Kingdome of this Island King Offa then reigning in the year of our Lord 787. where a Roman Legat presided and where were assembled the Arch-BB and BB. of both Provinces Gregorius Ostiens Episcopus Praesidens ponit Author Antiq. Britan. Ecclesiae in Northumbria Hollenshedus verò rectiùs in regno Merciorum insomuch that the Noble Collector styles it Concilium Legatinum Pan-Anglicum A Convocation of all England Si quis autem quod absit sine poenitentia confessione de hac luce discessit pro eo minimè orandum est where amongst other Chapters and Constitutions there is one De conversione poenitentia confessione and for Confession thus If any person which God forbid depart this life without repentance and confession that man is not to be prayed for and not to pray for the Dead was in that age held as uncharitable as with us to pray for the living is esteemed charitable And that Confession there mentioned is the same made unto the Priest the words immediately before specifie Juxta judicium Sacerdotum modum causae Eucharistiam sumite fructus dignos poenitentiae sacite Inter Concilia Orbis Britan. c. operà scrutinio V. C. Henrici Spelman Equ Aurati edita Lond. A. D. 1639. where we read According to the judgment of the Priest and nature of the offence receive the Eucharist and bring forth fruit meet for repentance A. D. 924. King Athelstane King Athelstane who began his reign over all England by him reduced to a Monarchy and Crowned at Kingston by Athelmus Arch-Bishop of Canturbury in the year of grace 924. amongst his and other laws of the Saxon Princes collected by Mr Lambard this is fifth that was enacted by him If any being condemned desire to confess himself unto the Priest that all do earnestly and diligently promote all the Laws of God c. I have not seen the law in Lambard himself the Treatise being in few mens hands where I suppose it is more at large but rather as it is pointed unto Book 16. pag. 1360. and the
that season with admonitions tending to unfeigned repentance Prohibemus ne ullus sacerdos lapsus in peccatum mortale ad altare praesumat accedere celebraturus antequam confiteatur nec puto ut quidam errantes credunt quod mortalia deleantur per confessionem generalem Lindw l. 3. de celebr Mis cap. Lintheamina The same Arch-Bishop also forbad Priests that had fallen into mortal sin to approch unto the Altar there to celebrate without making their confession adding that he could not suppose as some others erreneously believed that mortal sins could be washed away by a general confession Where by the way note that Parenthesis good Reader as some believe intimating that there were in those dayes some that so believed viz. that general Confession might procure remission of sins and were not perhaps so punctual for private particular confession whose belief that Prelate censured for erroneous By the same man are Ghostly Fathers under a great penalty conjured to secrecy and silence Nullus sacerdos irâ odio metu etiam mortis audeat detegere quovis modo alicujus confessionem signo motu vel verbo generaliter vel specialiter Et si super hoc convictus fuerit sine spe reconciliationis non immeritò debet degradari Lin. l. 5. de poen remis c. Prohibemus That if at any time or by any means or upon pâ—ssion of hatred or fear of death shall lay open by signs motions or words either generally or specially what hath been privately deposited in Confession and shall be convicted thereof he shall be degraded without hope of reconciliation Also another Constitution of the same mans doing for the reviving of Publick penance for notorious scandalous offences Ut peccata graviora vulgatissimo suo scandalo totam commoventia civitatem sint solenni poenitentiâ castiganda Lindw l. 5. de poen remis c. Praeterea complaining that by the neglect of the ancient Canons the same hath been long buried in obliviâ—n whereby heynous sins have been the more frequented and the reynes and rigour of Christian discipline too much remitted And a * Lindw lib. 5. de poen remiss c. Licet fourth for the substitution of a grave and learned Penitentiary in every Deanry to take the Confessions of the Clergy residing within the same John Stratford Arch-Bishop of Canturbury MCCCXXXIV A. D. 1334. made a Provisional Law that Priests should not be cited juridically and thereby forced either to detect such arcana Et illis ex tunc Parochiani peccata renuunt confiteri Lind. l. 2. de Judiciis c. Exclusis infra as they received under the seal of Confession or else offer violence to their consciences lest thereby Parishioners might refuse to come to confession It seems equivocations mental reservations and such juglings devised to cheat justice were not up nor thought on when this course was taken that Judges should forbear to examine them The last of these Metropolitans that made any law for Confession is Simon Sudbury who was preferred to that eminency A. D. 1375. An. MCCCLXXV Confessiones mulierum audiantur in propatulo quantum ad visum non quantum ad auditum Moneantur Laici in principio Quadragesimae â—ito post lapsum consiteri ne peccatum suo pondere ad aliud trahat Lind. l. 5. de poen remis c. Confessiones mulierum He ordained women to be shriven in an open place where they may be seen of all but not heard And to admonish the Laity to repair unto Confession every year about the beginning of Lent and whilest their sins are green in their memory lest the weight of one sin press them upon another He ordained likewise to confess and communicate three times a year viz. at the three solemn Feasts of Christmas Easter and Whitsontide And to prepare themselves with such abstinence as the Priest should prescribe Prius tamen se praeparent per aliquam abstinentiam de consilio sacerdotis faciendam vivens ab ingressu ecclesiae arceatur moriens christianâ careat sepulturà Lind. l. 5. de poen remis c. Confessiones And all and every such Persons as should not come to confession and to the communion once a year at the least to be debarred from entring into the Church in his life time and after death his body not to be interred in Christian Burial By which constitutions we see how other times were appointed for Confession as well as Easter but then chiefly required for four causes and at those times is Confession required 1. Ratione sacramenti sc si vult celebrare vel communicare vel sacrum ordinem suscipere c. 2. Ratione periculi si est in periculo mortis 3. Ratione conscientiae ut si dictet sibi conscientia quod statim teneatur consiteri 4. Râ—tione dubii ut si nunc habeat confessoris copiam caeterum per totum annum non habiturum Lindwood supra saith Lindwood 1. In respect of the Sacrament whensoever the same shall be celebrated and received so upon admission into holy Orders c. 2. In respect of the danger or dread of death 3. In respect of the Conscience if a mans heart shall tell him that he hath present need of Confession 4. If it be doubtful a Confessor cannot be had within a year to take him while we may Some of these Canonical reasons we have before examined and censured A. D. 1533. A book of Religion entituled Articles devised by the Kings highness set forth an Reg. Henrici 8. 28. These were Ecclesiastical Constitutions made by several Church-men in their times But when Henry VIII had wrested the Supremacy of Spiritual causes from forraign Usurpation and annexed it to the Crown then for essayes of that new authority was substituted a Vicegerent for the Clergie Articles of Religion set forth and said to be devised by his Highness which caused the commotion of the * April 28. an RR. Hen. 8. 31. Hall Chron. p. 228. Lincoln-shire men And in a Parliament held at Westminster was established (a) Hall fol. 224. the act of the six articles which was named the bloudy statute and the whip of six strings which drew so much bloud upon poor Christians and whereof Auricular Confession was one of the strings The procurer of that Draconical law together with the occasion thereof is particularly described by our Ecclesiastical Annalist Mr John Fox whoever was the chief doer therein Ecclesiastical persons were the chief sufferers The King upon some distaste to his Clergy was willing to sharpen the edge of the Law against them and his minde being known there wanted not abbetters to whet him thereunto So fearful is the condition of the Church if once removed from under the shadow of the Crown and wings of the Royal Scepter and would soon become a prey to the little foxes if the Kingly-Lion should not protect And as in that Princes
by the latter our selves And I am of opinion many are displeased with Confession not for any hurt or distaste at the thing it self but at the difficulty thereof and abstain from it not as an act unlawful but unseemly to men of their quality and disagreeing with their disposition No small argument that it is a work of grace whereas our corrupt nature so much frowneth at it But how burthensome soever it may seem to flesh and bloud sure the burthen of a wounded Conscience is greater Acts 15.25 for who can bear it It seemed good unto the Holy Ghost and unto us as the first Council in the Church decreed to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things It being not the least part of prudence to cut off things superfluous as withall to impose necessary This later age hath not been so much a vintage as a pruning of the Churches vineyard And 't is not impossible for a quick and fruitful branch to be amputated and cut off amongst so many fruitless and unprofitable Matth. 13. â—9 Those Weeders had need to have great care that pull not up some hopefull blades amongst store of weeds There is not any I suppose that can throughly purge his floor and gather the wheat into his garnâ—r Matth. 3.12 but he whose fan is in his hand and will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fi e. I honour the memory of the first Reformers of the Church as good men yet but men and not exempted from errour and verily believe that the great abuse and jugling under the sacred veil of the keys Confession and Absolution the merchandize and trading in Indulgences the lewd profaning of Ecclesiastical censures made them less zealous for the true use of Confession the keys and censures and so by a kind of connivency there waxed a general coldness in all the parts of the mystical body of Christ in the commendable and necessary exercise thereof The Ministers and Pastors of Christs flock could with no sins for Confession no perplexity for the Conscience no wounds no diseases in the soul and that all the flock were so sound and whole that there needed no Physicians But they may wish the best and fear the worst and find too much work for Physicians if throughly imployed too many bonds and bars for their keys and too many infirmities for their power to work on Confession cannot be out of request so long as there are so strong temptations to assault and so weak a fort and poorly man'd to defend Let then thy soul be of more worth than thy body and to the healing of spiritual wounds lend a quicker ear for thy bodily health what wilt thou not undergo what not indure lancing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Clem. Alex. Str lib. 1. Ut valeat corpus ferrum pâ—tieris ignes Arida nec sitiens oâ—a â—â—gabis aquâ Ut valeas animo quicquam tolâ—rare recuses At pars haec pretium corpore majus habet burning purging vomiting and is a little shame in confession a small austerity in penance tedious to be undertaken for thy souls good thou settest not that price upon the better part of thy self which thou oughtest that refusest such receipts for the safety thereof For saith a Father he is nothing neer such a Benefactor which freeth the body frâ—m a disease 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Clem. Alex. Strom. l. 1. p. 258. as he that delivereâ—h the souâ— from unrighteousness in regard the soul is far more precious than the body Let then the great benefit redounding to the soul by confession vanquish the shame and natural repugnancy Declare thou thy sins first that thou mayest be justified Esay 43.76 as the LXXâ—I read it Justification follows upon that declaration not condemnation Whereupon Saint Chrysostome assignes the difference betwixt the consequent of confessing at the tribunal of God from terrestrial bars For at these external tribunals below after accusation and confession of sin 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrys 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tom 5. p. 139. deaâ—h followeth but at the divine Tribunal upon confession where the sinner accuseth himself there goes a Crown And herein is a beam of Gods mercy in not extorting Confession as our Judges do to the prejudice of the accused but as a Physician to know our diseases for their better healing and his justice too after a sort herein shineth that the sinner in confessing might blush for sin whereof he was not ashamed in committing By this means doth the Shepherd of the flock come by notice of the several kinds of infirmities wherewith his sheep are troubled and can the better prescribe the remedies By this discovery of sin many disorders may be rectified at this consistory of Conscience which no Political Benches of justice can search into or redress hereby secret wrongs may be recompensed secret amends may be made secret injuries remitted and secret enemies reconciled The greatest gainer is the Penitent himself for besides the assoyling of his offences he hath purchased a Counsellor to advise him for the best how to avoid sin a Comforter to embalme his wounded conscience from Gods word sweeter than the honey or the honey comb and an Advocate to plead on his behalf to God with prayer and intercession By this high minds are abated and a sinner waxeth sensible of a higher power incensed by his sin By this unbridled offenders are kept in some awe and discipline By this Gods Priests are the more reverenced and his ordinance in their hands more powerful In a word amongst all the Tribes Judah that is Confession hath the Star Scepter and promised seed The Answer then returned by the Neophytes or new Christians in Japonia Percontanti mihi quosnam Religionis Christianae ritus quaeve instituta sibi maxâ—mè crederent prosutura Duo illa semper sc confessionem communionem sine controversia responderunt Epist Japon l. 1. p. 59. 2. Dilinguae 1571. is very remarkable when Xaverius had often demanded of them what rites and exercises in the Christian Religion seemed unto them most profitable and availing constantly answered those two without all controversie the Communion and Confession 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ad eos qui in libellum inciderint 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 FUll Nineteen courses hath that glorious Bridegrome of heaven made and in which 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or space the other Luminary hath through many various revolutions returned to the same point in the Celestial girdle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lunae à Sole in Enneadecaeteride est 46′ 56″ cui in signifero respondit ¾ gr 16′ 56″ since this Treatise past the Authors last hand and eye having for ought he knew like the Antique subterraneous Obeliskes lyen buried or by the late more then Civil wars been driven into coverts in which process of time being grown out of knowledge and memory is by the hand of that immense providence sweetly disposing all things
to confession Harpsfield Cope hath set forth this story with great applause and tells us full sadly that the Portugals assailing a Castle in the East Indies Nulla priùs peccatorum confessione praecunte gravissimas negligentiae suae poenas experti sunt feles mures nigerrimi tanto numero támque horribiles noctu apparuerunt Cop. Dialog 2. pag. 297 298. came off with great loss for not being armed with confession and of a certain Portugal to whom in the night there appeared a great number of black Cats and Mice impar congressus very dreadful to see to and ready to have devoured him Histor alia impressa ante Alcoran p. 99. had they not been prevented by his prayers to a CRUCIFIX hanging in the room and his vows to be shriven with all speed I know not how such creatures as Cats and Mice may Cope in visions otherwise they hold little correspondence concerning the authority of such phantastick shades Casaub praefat de libert Ecclesiae Poenarum celebres sub styge feriae Prudent Bellar. de purg l. 2. c. 18. Sect. ad quintum wherewith the writings of Friers are replenished more than with wisdome and learning it may be said as the Turk did of Papal Indulgences granted by Pius II. to such as took armes against him requiring his Holiness to call in his Epigrams again and as Casaubon of the late interdict against the Venetian Republick that it was Dirum carmen and as Bellarmine of Prudentius appointing certain holy-dayes in hell for the damned souls to rest from their pains that he did but play more poetico So these and many other visions of this stamp seem to me nothing else but the Poetry of the Church of Rome or a moral application of pious and useful fables Thou seest good Reader no necessary cause why Confession should be so necessarily urged Reasons why Confession is not of absolute necessity in all cases and over all persons and our Church is the more sparing and tender in imposing any such absolute necessity upon these grounds following The first is because Auricular Confession hath not been practised continually in the Church but is the daughter and successor of that which was publickly solemnized I speak not of Confession in it self absolutely considered which I have elswhere laid down as a Divine Ordinance but of the clancular and privy carriage thereof to promove such ends as are designed in the Roman Church I say Confession so understood is not of absolute necessity but of late introduction Publick exhomologesis was in ancient times held such a sanctuary for troubled souls that not onely scandalous sinners which were obliged thereunto but many besides came in and confessed openly their sins carried in secrecy and submitted themselves to that discipline yea Qui de fide majore timore meliore erant quamvis nullo Sacrificii aut libelli facinore constricti apud Sacerdotes Dei dolenter simpliciter confitentur exomologesin conscientiae suae faciunt animi sui pondus exponunt salutarem medelam parvis licet modicis vulneribus requirunt Cypr. l. 2. de laps some devout Christians not stained with incensing unto Idols or casting the holy Scripture into the fire two scandals in those times purged with this discipline guilty onely of lesser scars and griefs grew ambitious of undergoing this burden of publick Confession and Penance and hence it was that many a scoffing Ishmael Multi verò audientes vel exprobrant vel irridâ—nt vel malè loquuntur Chemnit and railing Doeg began to exprobrate and deride the Penitents To this end therefore that the discipline might be carried in a discreet manner a prudent Minister was appointed to be made acquainted before hand and by whose advise the Penitent was directed what sins onely were fit to be opened in publick Confession And here is the first mention of Confession to a private Confessor with the occasion annexed that he hearing the story of a sinners life at large may select such offences onely as seemed to him fit for publication Circumspice diligâ—ntiùs cui dâ—beas consiteri peccatum tuum proba priùs Mâ—dicâ—m si iâ—tâ—llâ—xerit praeviderit talâ—m eâ—se languorem tuum qui in conventu totius Ecclâ—siae exponâ— debeat curari ex quo fortassâ— caetâ—â—i aedificari poterunt tu ipse sâ—nâ— sâ—nâ—â—â— multa hoc deliberatione satis perito Mâ—â—ici illius consilio procurandum est Oâ—igen hom 2. in Ps 37. tom 1. p. 293. Be circumspect saith Oâ—gen to whom thou art to Confess prove thy Physician first and if he shall understand and foresee thy disease to be such as ought to be exposed in the assembly of the Church and there to be cuâ—ed whereby peradventure others may be edified and thy self easily healed this must be done upon great deliberation and skilful advise of that Physician Private sins therefore brought in private Confession to hear them by the way and to advise the Penient whether they or onely some of them are fit to be openly known and in such cases to direct him further what course he should take in publick Penance But in process of time this rigour and devotion melted and many abstained from this Confession as abhorring to publish their sins and to bring themselves upon the stage For in Tertullians age when this discipline was in force Plerosque hoc opus ut publicationem sui aut suffugere aut de die in diem disserre pudoris magìs memores quam salutis Tert. de poenit c. 10. and the Church exercised with persecution it may seem strange that many should be more in fear of shame than death abstaining more from being Confessors of their faults than Martyrs for the truth I say the remedy was not as in his dayes to arme the Penitent with resolution for to trample under feet censure and shame but to remit something of the severity namely that the sin should be confessed in private Ut secretò consitâ—rentur Sacerdoti qui licèt crimen illud infacie Ecclesiae non proderet injungebat tamen delinquenti pul licam poenitentiam ut ipso sacto in genere coram Ecclesia confiteretur declaret se grave aliquid commisisse Chemnit ex Sozom nâ—in histor Tripartit l. 9. c. 35. and buried there onely the penance imposed was publickly to be performed by which the Church gathered although she knew it not that some grievous offence or other was committed as Chemnitius explicateth from Sozomen and the tripartite History Those whom you observe to do penance saith Saint Augustine have committed great sins Illi quos vidâ—tis agâ—re poenitentiam scelera sua comâ—â—serant aut adulteria aut alia immâ—nâ—a facta Aug. l. 1. de symb ad Catechum c. 6. as adulteries or some other foul facts the penance by them performed convincing them of hainous sin openly though not evidencing the same unto all Thus the Church became contented with publick penance
and remitted the confession of the sin unto private cars howbeit the publick dâ—tection of sin was left off earlier in the Greek Church than in the Latin for in the East the persecution under Decius was no sooner blown over but that the Church appointed a discreeâ— Presbyter to receive Confessions that Penitents might resort unto him and interest his bosome with their offences out of which he was to select such and prepare as he thought meet for the publick and conceal the rest and herein his office consisted The substituting of this Officer is witnessed by Socrates and Sozomen both whereby the penitent was not as formerly left to his choice of what Physician he pleased but confined to that Penitentiary the Church had ordained and this is that addiâ—ion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Socrat. hist l. 5. c. 19. viz. the election of one certain Penitentiary which those Historians note to have been made unto the penitential Canon Episcopi hanc 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Canoni adjecerunt ut Presbâ—ter bonae conversationis prudens 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ad hoc ordinaretur ut lapsi ad illum accederent ipsi confiterentur peccata Chemnit ex Sozomen Exam. p. 192. But whether this Penitentiary was taken to receive Confession of all sins and conceal them all onely imposing publick Penance or to discern what sins should publickly be rehearsed and what not can hardly by the light of story be discerned for the former opinion namely that none of the sins confessed were to be revealed serveth that requisite quality that he should be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one that could lay his hand upon his mouth and say nothing And for the later scilicet that some sins were revealed appeared by the confession of the vitiated Matron so soul that it caused the Church to stop the mouth of all publick Confession ever after My thoughts lead me to this issue that the Primitive Penitents were too forward to confess publickly more than needed therefore it was ordained that they should confess in private first and then if any of their sins were deemed fit by the Confessor to come abroad in publick they were admitted to that publick Medicine whereas the succeeding Penitents were too remiss in publick Confession and needed the spur insomuch that offences of that nature as needed publick expiation and discovered upon a private bearing were reserved for the Theatre and they obliged to publick recital and penance And when this also was taken away upon the Matrons stupration and the Church would hear no more of such matters without doubt the Confession and Penitentiary too were then abrogated In the Latin Church the discipline was on foot till Leo I. who was the first that exiled the same and set up Auricular Confession in its stead In whose dayes a writing the contents whereof were particular sins was exhibited by the Delinquents to be publickly read in Churches the same was attempted for private confession not long since and as that course was broken off by Leo Declarat non licere per literas seu internuncium Confessario absenti peccata Sacramentaliter confiteri ab eodem absolutionem obtinere Caracalla vit Clem. 8. in Platinae supplem so this attempt by Clement VIII who condemned the same as false temerarious and scandalous to confess by deputation or writing and receive absolution from a Priest not present The injunction of Leo followeth Let not a confession of several sins conceived in writing be publickly rehearsed Ne de singulorum peccatorum genere libellis scripto professio recitetur cúmque reatus sufficiat conscientiarum solis sacerdot bus indicari confessione secretá Quamvis enim plenitudo fidei videatur esse laudabilis quae propter Dei timorem apud homines crubescere non veretur tamen qâ—ia non omnium hujusmodi sunt peccata ut ea quae poenitentiam poscunt non timeant publicare removeatur tam improbabilis consuetudo ne multi à poenitentiae arceantur remediis dum aut erubescunt aut metuunt inimicis suis facta sua reserare quibus possint legum constitutionibus percelli sufficit â—â—m illa Confessio quae primùm Deo offertur tunc etiam Sacerdoti qui pro delictis Poenitentium precator accedit quòd tum demùm plures ad poenitentiam poterunt provocari si populi auribus non publicetur Conscientia confitentis Leo Epist 80. ad Episcopos Campaniae c. seeing it may suffice thâ—t the guilt of mens consciences be declared in secret Confession to the Priests alone for although the fulness of faith may seem to be laudable which for the fear of God doth not fear to blush before men yet because all sins are not of that nature that Penitents may not be afraid to publish such of them as require repentance Let so inconvenient a custome be removed lest many be driven back from the remedies of repentance whilest either they are ashamed or afraid to disclose their deeds before their enemies whereby they may be drawn within the peril of the laws For that confession is sufficient which is offered first unto God and then unto the Priest who cometh as an Intercessor for the sins of the Penitent for then at length we may be provoked to Repentance if that the Conscience of him that confesseth be not published to the ears of the people From this testimony of Leo we may observe 1. That to open confession of secret sins secret confession succeeded in the room thereof 2. We may observe also the reasons of this alteration viz. fear and danger of the law which accompanied the former practice and retarded many from the same to remove which impediments it self also was removed or rather changed 3. And lastly that the manner of Confession be it private or publick is but a Church-constitution and the law thereof but temporal and may be changed at the discretion of the Church as that ancient discipline so highly extolled by the Fathers yet by Leo is removed as an unprofitable custome and subject to divers inconveniences and notwithstanding his edict the times may come when the same may be fancied again and private Confession give way thereunto Private Confession then is not an ordinance of absolute necessity the thing to be demonstrated And therefore that conjecture of Beatus Rhenanus for which his mouth is stopt by the Index expurg is more than probable Ne qâ—is admiretur Tertullianum de clancularia ista admissorum confessione nihil loquutum quae quantùm conjicimus nata est ex ista exomologesi per ultroneam hominum pietatem ut occultorum peccatorum esset exomologesis occulta nec enim usquam praeceptam legimus B. Rhenan Arg. lib. de Poenit. pag. 11. edit Franckerae 1597. that clancular confession now in use took its beginning from the publick by the voluntary devotion of men that of secret sins there might be held a secret confession for we do not read that