Selected quad for the lemma: sin_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
sin_n	flesh_n	send_v	sinful_a	6,272	5	9.8762	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A39279	A defence of the Thirty nine articles of the Church of England written in Latin by J. Ellis ... now done into English ; to which are added the Lambeth Articles ; together with the judgment of Bishop Andrews, Dr. Overall, and other eminent and learned men upon them.; Articulorum XXXIX Ecclesiae Anglicanae defensio. English	Ellis, John, 1599?-1665.; Andrewes, Lancelot, 1555-1626.; Overall, John, 1560-1619.; Church of England. Thirty-nine Articles.	1700 (1700)	Wing E587; ESTC R1641	74,086	146

is an Union between Two absolute Things there ind●ed there is a Composition But in God his Essence is absolute and the Person relative And Persons do not differ from one another really and essentially but really and personally i. e. by relative Personalities Obj. 8. Where there are One and Three Beings there there are Four Buut in God there are One and Three Beings the Father Son and Holy Ghost are Three and yet Essence it self is none of these Answ. * We are not to imagine here that the Author meant to favour the Sabellian Heresie For though to say that Three Persons are Three Modes of Subsistence be Sabelliani● yet as an Answer to the foregoing Objection the fa●rest Interpretation is That though there be Three distinct Persons in the Godhead or Divine Nature the Divine Nature is not to be reckoned as a thing distinct and separate from them And this will give likewise an Orthodox Sense to the Comparison of Light There is one only Essence in God and Three Persons are only the Three Modes of his Subsistence Now Modes do not number a thing but they are numbered and included in it so that it cannot be said to be different from them So for Example if there be Three Degrees of Light the Morning Noon and Evening Light Light it self will not be any fourth thing in respect of these Degrees which are to be reckoned up and included under Light singly and simply considered Obj. 9. If there be Three Persons in the Divine Essence then there will be first and second before and after and so it will not be perfectly simple Answ. Before and after do not relate to the Essence but to the Modes of subsisting And though they generally suppose a priority of Time and Essence yet there is a priority of Order that does not exclude a Co-aeternity And Eternity has relation to the Essence of God Obj. 10. The Doctrine of the Trinity is contrary to Reason because it asserts the same numerical Essence to be wholly in One and wholy in Three which seems impossible Answ. The Divine Essence is One and Infinite and so is wholly in One Person and wholly in Three This cannot be said to be impossible since the Essence of a reasonable Soul is totally in the whole and wholly in every Part. Now the true Image of this thing is this That many Men are One Man only by a Participation of the Species or Humane Nature Obj. 11. This Doctrine introduces Three Infinites when it is impossible thsre should be any more than One. Answ. There is One Infinite viz. the Divine Essence however that Infinity is not a personal Property but an essential one There are not indeed Three infinite Gods but Three Persons make up One infinite Nature Obj. 12. The Father is said to be the only true God Joh. 17. 3. Answ. Hereby are excluded all fictitious Deities or Creatures but not the Son or the Holy Ghost Even the Father alone is God who has an Omnipotent Son Obj. 13. The Scripture does not make use of these Words and Phrases Trinity Person and to proceed Answ. Although these Terms are not to be met with in the Scriptures yet the Sense and Meaning of them are plainly to be fetched from thence ART II. Of the Word or Son of God which was made very Man THE Son which is the Word of the Father begotten from everlasting of the Father the very and eternal God of one Substance with the Father took Man's Nature in the Womb of the Blessed Virgin of her Substance So that Two whole and perfect Natures that is to say the Godhead and Manhood were joyned together in One Person never to be divided whereof is One Christ very God and very Man who truly suff●red was cru●fied dead and buried to reconc●le his Father to us and to be a Sa●fice not only for O●nal Guilt but also for the Actual Sins of Men. Obj. 1. That it does by no means agree to a Spiritual N●e to ●eget therefore Christ is not 〈◊〉 of God Answ. This is true Physically speaking in the manner that corporeal Substances be et their Likeness and Substance but it very well agrees in a Me a physical Sense as an Angelical or Human Mind begets Reason which is the proper Fruit of the Mind and in the most Spiritual Sense of all we may suppose one Person to beget another from and in himself as the Father begat the Son Obj. 2. That Christ has not all the Divine Perfections because he wants Paternity which is a Perfection of the Father therefore he is not God Answ. Christ has all the absolute Perfections that are common to the Three Persons which is sufficient although he has not the Chracteristical Ones which are proper only to One. Obj. 3. That if the Father and the Son are of the same Essence then if the Son be incarnate and made Flesh the Father is so too Answ. The whole Divine Essence is incarnate not absolutely but relatively inasmuch as it is wholly in the Son the whole Divinity originally undertook the Work of Incarnation This may be illustrated by a Similitude Three Sisters weave one Garment and the second wears it Obj. 4. If the eternal Son of God be incarnated it follows that he had a Being and was a Person before he was incarnate If this be so What is that which was conceived in the Virgin 's Womb and bo●n Not a Person for then there would be Two Persons and Two Sons of God If the Person is not born of the Virgin how does that deserve to be called a Man which is born of her since no body can be called a Man that is not a Humane Person For a Man is distinguished to be such by his Person and nothing else Answ. There is one sort of Individual which subsists of it self and is rightly called Person and another which does not subsist of it self but in another as the Hand in the Body But because it does not subsist of it self is therefore not to be called a Person So the Humane Nature of Christ never did subsist by it self but always in the Divine Logos and for that Reason was never of it self a Person Obj. 5. God sent his Son not in true Flesh but as the Apostle says Rom. 8. 3. in the Similitude of sinful Flesh And so Christ was not a true Man Answ. The true Flesh of Christ is called the Similitude of Flesh not simply so but as obnoxious to the Sin of the Flesh not that Christ did assume the Likeness of Flesh and as it were the Image of a Body and not a real one but only the Similitude of sinning Flesh This could not be for Christ was not a Sinner though he was like to Sinners Obj. 6. Christ and Melchisedeck are compared together because both of them were without Father and without Mother Heb. 7. 3. And therefore Christ was not born of a Virgin Answ. Christ is said to be without Father

and Mother in respect to different Natures not simply so For he was without Father in respect of his Humane Nature and in respect of his Divine without Mother Obj. 7 God was not angry with M●nkind but abundantly loved it and therefore out of meer Charity sent his Son for which Reason there was no necessity that the Father should be reconciled to us Answ. God was certainly angry with us although he sent his Son He loved us as Creatures and hated us as Transgressors God's Wrath excludes the special and particular though not that general Love of God wherewith as such he loves his Creatures ART III. Of the going down of Christ into Hell AS Christ died for us and was buried so also it is to be believed that he went down into Hell Obj. 1. The Evangelists that have mentioned the most minute Circumstances in the History of Christ do not speak one Word of this Descent into Hell Answ. The Evangelists desired only to relate those things of Christ whereof either they themselves were Eye-witnesses or else had it from others that were so but no Mortal could see Christ descend Obj. 2. Christ did not go down into Hell in his Deity which is every where nor in his Body which was laid in a Sepulcher nor in his Soul which was in Paradise Luke 23. 43. Answ. The Soul of Christ might be upon one and the same Day in Hell and in Paradise For why may we not say that Christ after his Death and the Union of his Soul and Body restored might in a Moment descend into Hell and in a Moment return from thence We ought to believe many things the Manner and Circumstances whereof we are not able to define Obj. 3. Christ did not descend that he might shew his Victory because his Resu●rection was but the beginning of his Triumph nor that he might further suffer because he said upon the ●ss It is finished nor finally that he might free the Fathers from Limbo since Limbo is a meer Tale. Answ. * The Opinion ●f Bishop Pea●on and other emment Men of our Church in this Matter seems to be safer and l●ss liable to Exceptions That by He● or Hades is meant rather ●he Place and State of the Dead after the Separation of Soul and Body when Christ as to his Humanity was willing to be detained ●ill his Resur● His Resurrection was the beginning of his Triumph manifested to us but perhaps not absolutely so for his Descent into the Lower Parts mentioned Ep● 4. 9. was before his Resurrection And this Place seems very strongly to prove the real Descent of Christ into Hell Nor by our Adversaries Confession is there any Impiety in this Opinion if it be said that Christ went to manifest his Victory to the infernal Spirits and then presently enter'd into Paradise as he promis'd the Thief Obj. 4. It did not become Christ to honour those with his Presence who had been unworthy of his Favour and were eternally damned Ans. It did become Christ and for the Demonstration of his Justice and Glory it was fitting that he should present himself a Conqueror to infernal Spirits that he might bring a Terror upon the Devils and reproach the damned with their Folly and Wickedness However it be let us believe that Christ went down into Hell although we are not fully and plainly satisfied of the Sense and Manner of it ART IV. Of the Resurrection of Christ. CHRIST did truly rise again from Death and took again his Body with Flesh Bones and all things appertaining to the Perfection of Man's Nature wherewith he ascended into Heaven and there sits until he return to judge all Men at the last Day Yet it should seem that Christ could not raise himself from the Dead For Obj. 1. It appears very unaccountable that any one should die and yet raise himself to Life again Answ. It is indeed very unaccountable that mere Man should rise again by his own Power but Christ is God as well as Man Obj. 2. The Scriptures generally ascribe the Resurrection of Christ to God the Father as Rom. 6. 4. Answ. His Resurrection is indeed ascribed to the Father but not to him alone It is attributed to both because of the perfect Unity of their Essence Whatsoever the Father does that does the Son do likewise Obj. 3. 'T is objected That Bodies after Resurrection are not Flesh and Bones but of a Spiritual Nature 1 Cor. 15. 44. how could Christ then reassume his Body with Flesh and Bones Answ. Bodies after their Resurrection are said to be Spiritual not as to their Substance and Essence but as to their Qualities and Endowments they will be like to Spirits immortal and wanting neither Meat nor Drink Obj. 4. Bodies of Flesh are not immortal because as the Praphet Esa. 4. 6. says All Flesh is Grass Ans. All Flesh of pure Man is corruptible and as Grass but the Flesh of Christ is not such The Prophet there speaks of the common and ordinary Condition of Mortals and not of a most glorious Saviour who is very God Obj. 5. The Apostle tells us 1 Cor. 15. 50. That Flesh and Blood cannot inherit the Kingdom of God how then could Christ with both these ascend up into Heaven Answ. The Apostle speaks of Man as corrupted and not washed from his Sins by Christ or else of Flesh not yet freed from Corruption That such shall not inherit the Kingdom of God for the Body cannot enter into Heaven till it be freed from Corruption Obj. 6. Christ will not forsake us even to the last Judgment for he told his Disciples Mat. 28. 20. Lo I am with you even to the end of the World And in the way to Damascus he appeared to St. Paul Acts 9. 17. And again in the Castle he stood by him in the Night Acts 23. 11. Answ. Christ speaks of a Spiritual Presence by his Grace and not of a Bodily one by Nature And then what if Christ did promise his Disciples that he would be with them by a Substantial Presence if need so required We are not to fix Christ so to the Heavens as if he could not appear upon Earth as perhaps in an extraordinary manner he did appear to St. Paul although many understand that place of a mental Vision However Heaven is the ordinary place of his Residence Obj. 7. It is apparent that Christ will not judge all Men for he that believes shall not come into Judgment John 5. 24. The Prince of this World the Devil is already judged John 16. 11. And also he that believes not John 3. 18. is condemned already Answ. He that believeth shall not come into the Judgment of Condemnation but of Absolution But the Devils and all Infidels are already judged in God's Decree or in his revealed Word or by their own Consciences which is the beginning of their Punishment but hereafter they will be condemned accordding to the Revelation and Manifestation of Judgment already made to

Jewish Commonwealth and these do not bind Christians but there are others which have the nature of common Justice and a natural Law and are the Explications and Determinations of the moral one and the observation of them is likewise injoyned in the New Testament But these do bind every one to observe them Obj. 9. The moral Law is not made for a Righteous Man 1 Tim. 1. 9. Answ. The Law as to its Punishments whereof it threatens a great many is not made for a Righteous Man to Condemnation altho' it be made as to its Rules for Observation A just Man even for the love of Justice conforms himself to that Law and then the threatnings of the Law signifie nothing to him Consequently then this can be nothing to wilful Libertines that the Just are not bound by any Christian Laws ART VIII Of the Three Creeds THE Three Creeds Nice Creed Athanasius's Creed and that which is commonly called the Apostle's Creed ought thoroughly to be received and believed for they may be proved by most certain Warrants of Holy Scripture Obj. 1. This Article seems to be imperfect because it makes no mention of the Ephesian Chalcedonian and Constantinopolitan Creeds which were wont to be approved of by the Church Answ. This Article mentions the chief Creeds not exclusively to others as if they might not be true likewise and it was not necessary to mention All. Obj. 2. The Inventions of Men are not to be obtruded upon the Church nor to be received as necessary to be believed but the foregoing Creeds as such and are proposed to our Faith as if they were the W●d of God Answ. The aforesaid Creeds were indeed composed and methodized by Men but yet they are not the meer Fancies of Men contrary to the Holy Scriptures which the Argument supposes but the Doctrine contained in them is conformable to the Word of God Neither do we receive them with an equal degree of Faith with the Holy Scripture but we give them the next place to That and reverence them as the chief Monuments of Faith Obj. 3. To omit others that Sentence in Athanasius's Creed seems to be too severe where he speaks of the Confession of Faith That except every one do keep it whole and undefiled without doubt he shall perish everlastingly What shall we then say of those that labour under an invincible Ignorance How shall they believe on him of whom they have not heard says St. Paul Rom. 10. 14 If then Men want the Means of Knowledge and the Tidings of this Doctrine has in no sort come to them it is plain they are not to be blamed and that they are free from Damnation for God obliges no one to Impossibilities Answ. Athanasius means chiefly those to whom the Catholick Faith has been propounded and explained who have all the means requisite for the knowledge of the Truth As to others who of them will be saved God himself will in an extraordinary manner enlighten their Understandings that they may perceive what things are necessary to Salvation ART IX Of Original Sin ORiginal Sin stands not in the following of Adam as the Pelagians do vainly talk but it is the Fault and Corruption of the Nature of every Man that naturally is ingendered of the Off-spring of Adam whereby Man is very far gone from Original Righteousness and is of his own Nature inclined to Evil so that the Fleth lusteth always contrary to the Spirit And therefore in every Person born into this World it deserves God's Wrath and Damnation And this Infection of Nature does remain yea in them that are Regenerated whereby the Lust of the Flesh called in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which some do expound the Wisdom some Sensuality some the Affection some the Desire of the Flesh is not subject to the Law of God And altho' there is no Condemnation for them that believe and are Baptized yet the Apostle does confess that Concupiscence and Lust has of it self the nature of Sin Against which it is Objected Obj. 1. That God does not punish the same Sin twice but he has ●ready punished Adam's Sin in Adam and therefore will not punish it in us Ans. Adam's Sin was not Numerically but Specifically One and that inclusive of the whole Species As he sinned so have we likewise sinned in him and we are justly punished in our selves Obj. 2. It is plain there is no such thing as Original Sin because the Son shall not bear the Iniquity of the Father says the Prophet Ezek. 18. 20. Answ. The Son does not bear the Personal Sins of his Father but the Sin of the first Man was a stain of the whole Nature when therefore any one is punished for the Sin of Adam he is punished for his own Obj. 3. Sin is a voluntary thing but Original Sin is not so in Infants Ans. Original Sin is voluntary in All nay even in Infants too for our Wills were in the Will of Adam as in the Principle of Mankind in him we willed and desired Evil. Obj. 4. An Accident of one Individual is not transferred to the whole Species but the Sin of Adam was only an Accident of one Individual Ans. Adam inasmuch as he was the Principle of Human Nature was to be look'd upon here as an universal Cause Obj. 5. The Children of Holy Men are Holy 1 Cor. 7. 14. therefore they are not born in Sin Ans. The Children of Holy Men are not so Holy as to be free from Original Sin but they are called so in regard of a Communion with the Church by reason of that Covenant Gen. 17. 7. I will be a God to Thee and to thy Seed They are therefore Holy with a relative and not with any inherent Holiness so also they are Innocent in respect to those Sins which are committed against Knowledge Obj. 6. In Baptism we receive a perfect Remission of Sins therefore Original Sin is wholly taken away and so remains not in the Regenerate Ans. Remission of Sin takes away Sin as to its Imputation not as to its Being for Mortification is but imperfect in this Life so in Baptism Sin is taken away but not so much the Sin it self as the Sting of it that it may not hurt us Obj. 7. Things absolutely disagreeing do not meet in the same Subject but Sin and Righteousness are of that sort therefore since there is Righteousness in the Regenerate there can be no Sin there Answ. Sin and Righteousness cannot be in the same Subject in the highest but yet easily in lower degrees Obj. 8. Concupiscence or a proneness to Evil is distinguished from Sin as the Cause is from the Effect Jam. 1. 15. and therefore is not of it self to be accounted Sin Answ. Concupiscence is distinguished from Actual Sin and from an external Act already compleated but in the mean time it has of it self the nature of a Sin because of it self it is not subjected to the Law of God And it is this

before Men as is plain from Verse 18. Shew me thy Faith by thy Works and Ver. 21. Abram was justified by the Work of Offering up his Son i. e. he was declared Righteous whereas before by the righteousness of Faith he had been pronounced Just before God Gen. 15. 6. Rom. 4. Obj. 4. Evil Works condemn therefore Good Ones justifie for the same reason holds in things that are opposite Answ. These Opposites here are not equal which that Axiom supposes for Evil Works are perfectly Evil but Good Ones are imperfectly Good Obj. 5. We are justified by Faith as appears by the foreg●ing Article but Faith is a Good Work for he that believes does well therefore we are justified by Faith which is a Good Work Answ. The major of that Argument is in one sense true and in another false for Faith properly speaking is not our Righteousness nor is it so imputed to us but it is the object of our Faith that is so to wit the Merit of Christ. ART XIII Of Works before Justification WOrks done before the Grace of Christ and the Inspiration of his Spirit are not pleasant to God forasmuch as they spring not of Faith in Jesus Christ neither do they make Men meet to receive Grace or as the School Authors say deserve Grace of Congruity Yea rather for that they are not done as God hath willed and commanded them to be done we doubt not but that they have the nature of Sin It is Objected Obj. 1. That God has rewarded some Works of Unbelievers as for Example the Egyptian Midwives Exod. 1. 21. and therefore they seemed to be acceptable to him Answ. From any Temporal Reward we are not to gather that the Work was in it self pleasing to God Obj. 2. The Gentiles do by Nature the things of the Law Rom. 2. 14. Now with such God is well pleased Answ. The Gentiles do indeed by Nature the things of the Law in some external Duties But not as to all other requisite Circumstances because they do them not in Faith nor to the Glory of the true God Obj. 3. Cornelius was a Gentile But before his Conversion to Christ his Alms-deeds were praised as good and acceptable Acts 10. 1. So that his Good Works seem to have disposed him to Grace or to have deserved as the School-Men say the Grace of Congruity Answ. Cornelius was endued with the extraordinary Grace of God and God rewarded him accordingly And he seems to have had a knowledge of Christ to come for his Prayers had not been heard but by Christ our Mediator and upon that account he is thought to have been Regenerate Obj. 4. If the Works of the Unregenerate have the nature of Sin as the Article expresses t it were better not to do than to do them because by doing them they sin and by not doing them the Sin would not possibly be so great And therefore it were better if such Men neither relieved the Poor nor taught the Ignorant Answ. Unbelievers would sin in omitting what they ought to do and the Sin of Omission is sometimes greater than the Sin of Commission However Works are not to be forbid for any accidental Fault of the Man but the Gentiles and the Unconverted are to be perswaded to do all Good Things which they are even obliged to by Precept The Works of an unregenerate Man have the Nature of Sin only accidentally as to the Manner and the End of Acting and not as to the Substance of the Works ART XIV Of Works of Supererogation VOluntary Works besides over and above God's Commandments which they call Works of Supere●ogation cannot be taught without Arrogancy and Impiety For by them Men do declare that they do not only render unto God as much as they are bound to do but that they do more for his Sake than of bounden Duty is required Whereas Christ says plainly When ye have done all that are commanded to you say We are unprofitable Servants Obj. 1. Christ said to a certain young Man Mat. 19. 21. I●●hou wilt be perfect sell all that thou hast and give to the Poor This was Counsel t●at did not indeed oblige all Men but if it were put in practice 't would procure a 〈◊〉 exc●llent deg●●f Glo●y Answ. This was a particular Precept given to this young Man and what is here commanded that every one is obliged to perform if the Necessity of his Brethren require it which also was practised by the Primitive Christians Affirmative Precepts although they always oblige yet not in all Conditions simply considered but on Supposition there be found requisite Circumstances Obj. 2. The Apostle tells us 1 Cor. 7. 25. Concerning Virgins I have no command yet I give my Advice which whosoever follows will do more than is absolutely necessary Answ. We cannot gather from hence that there is any thing more perfect than the Observation of God's Commands or indeed conducing to eternal Life Neither does this Opinion of St. Paul respect all times but only that present Necessity whilst the Church was under Persecution And then be it the Apostle's Council that Virginity is to be preferred to Matrimony this is directed to none but those to whom God has given the Gift in which Case this Counsel becomes a Precept to those who have the peculiar Gift of Continence There are indeed many Counsels concerning indifferent things but we reject such as ascribe a meritorious and greater Power to things purely arbitrary than to the Commands of God Obj. 3. St. Paul 1 Cor. 9 15. boasts of his Works of Supererogation because be had preached the Gospel freely which was not necessary for him to do Answ. St. Paul preached the Gospel freely that he might give no occasion of Reproach to false Apostles as if he took upon him that Office for the sake of Gain The avoiding of Scandal is not then a Work of Supererogation but every ones Duty for woe to him by whom an Offence cometh Mat. 18. 7. ART XV. Of Christ alone without Sin CHRIST in the Truth of our Nature was made like unto us in all things Sin only excepted from which he was clearly void both in his Flesh and in Spirit He came to be a Lamb without Spot who by Sacrifice of himself once made should take away the Sins of the World and Sin as St. John says was not in him But all we the rest although baptized and born again in Christ yet offend in many things and if we say we have no Sin we deceive our selves and the Truth is not in us Obj. 1. It is said That God made Christ to be Sin for us who knew no Sin 2 Cor. 5. 21. Answ. God is said to have made Christ to be Sin for us because he gave him as a Sacrifice for Sin and no otherwise Obj. 2. Every one that abideth in God sinneth not 1 John 3. 6. Therefore the Regenerate ●hat so abid● do not offend in many things Answ. By this we are to