he gave him sicut promissus sic missus he was not more mercifully promised than faithfully sent It did not seem good to his wisdome to confer this jewel presently but in the mean space that the Church might have somewhat to support her he vouchsafed the promise of it divine promises are as sweet bits to stay our stomachs before the full meal of his actual performances the promise of Christs first coming was that which comforted the Iewes and the promise of his second coming is that which now reviveth the Christian Church and since we have found him making good his word in the one we may assure our selves he will fulfill it in the other since as he was so good as to give a word so he will be so good as his word and give the thing whatsoever it is that he is pleased to promise for so it was in that singular eminent promise of Christ who is therefore not unfitly called the word and so much for that 2. The other substantive yet remaineth to wit life which is in the place of an adjective and may be rendred as an Epithete the living word and look as Christ when he is compared to bread to a stone it is with this addition the bread of life a living stone to difference him from other stones from common bread so he is here called the word of life to distinguish him from and advance him above other words for whereas other words though spoken by living persons yet have no life in themselves this word is the living word personally subsisting or else as he is called the bread of life because he giveth and communicateth life to them that feed on him so here the word of life because he is the author of life to them that receive him but the discussion of this falleth more fitly in in the next part to which therefore I pass on namely The particular exemplification in which Christ is characterized as God-man as God as man as God-man he is stiled the life and the eternal life as God he is said to be the life which was with the Father as man he is the life which was manifested Of each of which with all possible brevity and perspicuity He is called the life that eternal life If you ask in what respect this agreeth to him the answer is already hinted but shall now be more largely prosecuted He is the life and that eternal two wayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 formaliter and efficienter in himself in respect of us as being both vivus and vivificus living giving life 1. Christ is the life and that eternal life because in himself he liveth for ever this is true of him primarily as God this being one of his choice attributes that he is the living God inasmuch as divine attributes are better expressed by the abstract than the concrete he is fitly said not onely to be living but life it self and this life is most properly said to be eternal because it is so both a parte ante a parte post from everlasting to everlasting Secondarily this is true of him as Mediator God-man since though there was a time when thus he began to live to wit at his assumption of our nature and likewise his life on earth did expire to wit at his passion yet now he dieth no more death hath no more dominion over him but he is alive for evermore and that to make intercession 2. But that which I conceive most suitable to the Apostles meaning is that Christ is said to be the life because he is the original of life to us in this respect the abstract fitly agreeth to him because life is in him as sap in the root water in the fountain to convey it to all that believe on him in this sense it is that Christ useth it concerning himself as appeareth by his own Commentary I am the life whosoever believeth in me though he were dead yet shall he live hence it is that he is called by the Apostle Paul expressely our life nor is he onely life but eternal life that life which as Mediator he vouchsafeth to believers being eternal indeed all creatures are beholding to him for their natural life in him we live move and have our being but the life which believers have by him is an eternal life according as he saith himself I give to them eternal life This is that life which as the learned Davenant observeth 1 Christus promisit Christ promised to his disciples and in them to all Christians where he saith it is my Fathers good pleasure to give you the Kingdome 2 promeruit by his own death he purchased for all believers in which respect eternal life is said to be the gift of God through Iesus Christ our Lord 3 praeparavit being now ascended into heaven he there maketh ready for us according as he saith himself I go to prepare a place for you and yet more 4 inchoat he begins by the work of grace in the hearts of all the faithful in which respect he that believeth on him is said to have everlasting life and finally 5 reddet he will at the last day consummate by glory Indeed then it is that our bodies being raised our persons shall be glorified and this eternall life actually conferred therfore our blessed Saviour joyneth these two together in that forementioned place I am the resurrection and the life thus as the oyntment ran down from Aarons head to his beard and thence to his skirt so that eternal life which Christ rising from the grave personally enjoyeth shall be communicated to all his members To sum it up Christ God-man Mediator is the life that eternal life in respect of his threefold offices of King Priest and Prophet as Prophet he is the life by way of Revelation discovering this eternal life to us as Priest by way of impetration procuring this eternal life for us as King by way of collation conferring this eternal life on us and as the fulness of water is dispensed by the Sea to the Earth and the fulness of light is communicated by the Sun to the Air and the fulness of Corn was divided by Ioseph among the people so the fulness of grace and glory of life even eternal life is conveyed by Christ to his Church and therefore very justly doth this character belong to him And now what should this consideration teach us But 1. To bewail our sad condition whilest we are without Christ for if Christ be the life all that know him not or believe not in him must needs be in a state of death and damnation It is observable that St. Paul speaking of the Ephesians whilest in the state of unregeneracy saith they were dead in sins and trespasses and a little after renders this as the reason because at that time they were without Christ indeed as
that punishment which belonged to us we must needs be thereby acquitted and cleansed to this purpose he is called by the Authour to the Hebrews a surety and look as the surety paying his debt for whom he is bound dischargeth him from his creditor so Christ suffering our punishment freeth us from the obligation to it which is all one with cleansing from the guilt of sin and the reason is plain for since the guilt of sin is its binding the sinner over to the punishmenâ— Christ taking that punishment upon himself and suffering it in our roome must needs thereby cleanse us from that guilt so that in few words Christs blood being 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a laver became 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a price satisfactory for our debt hath obtained the forgiveness of it to us and so we are cleansed Having in some measure according to the scriptures explained the genuine notion of this causality I shall not much trouble my selfe nor you with those farfetched and ieiune inventions of the Socinians whereby they endeavour to elude these truths and yet I cannot passe by one evasion because it is that Socinus annexeth to this very scripture as if this saying the blood of Christ cleanseth from sin were no more but that his blood declareth us to be assureth us that we are cleansed so that what the Orthodox attribute to the Sacrament instituted by Christ in commemoration of his blood that these Hereticks attribute to the blood it selfe but how incongruous it is to expound this of a declarative cleansing appeareth in that the Apostle who could best interpret his own language in the very next verse save one unfolds it by forgiving besides this construction maketh cleansing from sin to antecede Christs blood for if it did not praeexist there not be could any declaring or confirming of it whereas the scripture both here else where plainly positively asserteth this cleansing to flow from come through the blood of Christ the consideration hereof no doubt forced Socinus to the finding out of other solutions and there fore he sometimes asserts that Christs blood cleanseth inasmuch as it perswadeth us to a beleefe hope of eternall life whereby we are induced to holiness of life and so our sins are cleansed but all which is hereby ascribed to Christs death is only a morall causality nay rather a meere antecedency sure it is Christs resurection rather then his death which ingenders that faith and hope in us and it is not imaginable that the scripture should so often attribute that to the death which cheifely depends on the resurrection of Christ adde to this which is very considerable how remote if any at all an influence it is which Christs blood according to this sence hath upon this cleansing for as Grotius hath well observed the thread must be drawn out to this length Forgiveness and cleansing from sin is conferred upon them that live holily to live holily we are induced by a certaine faith and hope of the reward the example of Christ raised from the dead and exalted to glory for the holinesse of his life is a way to beget this faith hope that glorifying and rising his death did necessarily antecede and thus our cleansing from sin is obtained by his blood but how credible it is that the scriptue should so frequently so positively so expresly attribute this cleansing to Christs blood and yet the dependance of these one upon the other to be at so remote a distance and of so slender an energie let any one who hath but a competent use of his reason Judge 3. I proceed therefore to the answer of the last question nor need we go further then the text it selfe to finde that if you would know how this blood becometh so effectuall to cleanse from sin the answer is because it is the blood of Iesus Christ his son I shall not altogether passe by nor yet insist upon that note which Estius hath upon the blood of his son that in them there is a confutation of three heresyes at once the Mâ—â—ichees who deny the truth of Christs humane nature since as Alexander said of his wound clamat me esse hominem it proclaymeth me a man we may say of his blood for had he not beene man he could not have bled have dyed the Ebionites who deny him to be God since being Gods naturall son he must needs be of the same essence with himselfe and the Nestorians who make two persons which if true the blood of Christ the man could not have been called the blood of Christ the son of God That which I conceive here chiefly to be taken notice of is that our Apostle contents not himselfe to say the blood of Jesus Christ but he addeth his son to intimate to us how this blood became avaâ—leable to our cleansing to wit as it was the blood not meerly of the son of Mary the son of David the son of Man but of him who was also the son of God Indeed that it was the blood of an innocent pure unsinnâ—ng man did much conduce to this worke since had he beene himselfe a sinner he could not have cleansed us from our sins and therefore our Apostle in the next chapter joyneth these two together Jesus Christ the righteous the propitiation for our sins and the Apostle Peter puts these together as of a pretious lambe without spot and blemish to this purpose it is St. Austin saith the blood because it was the blood of him who had no sin himselfe was shed for the remission of our sins and Leo sutably the powring out of a just mans blood for the unjust was effectuall to our redemption But though this was a necessary qualification in this person who did shed his blood for this end yet that which gave the efficacy and merit to his blood was the fullness of the Godhead which dwelt in him personaly thus Damasen speaking of his deity addeth thence his passion became of a saving and quickâ—ning virtue and St. Cyrill expresly his blood had not been a price for the worlds sin if he had been only man Indeed Socinus asserts that the dignity of his person added nothing to the value of his sufferings because the divinity it selfe did not suffer but though the Godhead did not suffer yet Godman did suffer and he who endured the punishment was God though he did not indure it as God in these respects it is said they crucify'd the Lord of Glory and God is said to purchase his Church with his blood and here it is called the blood of Iesus Christ his son and we may as well say it is all one to kill a King as a beggar a Father as a stranger because the mortall wound is directed against the body not the dignity or affinity The summe then is this Christs deity being personally united to his manhood giveth an efficacy to his sufferings hence
in our estimation The three persons in the sacred Deity God the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost their Trinity in Unity and Unity in Trinity The three-fold state of man to wit deformed reformed and transformed corrupt regenerate and glorified The three-fold coming of Christ in the flesh by his Spirit and at the day of judgement Those three grand enemies of mans salvation the flesh world and the devil The three Theological graces Faith Hope and Charity The three principal duties of Religion Prayer Hearing and Almes are plainly set before us in this parcel of Holy Writ Nay yet once more Those three things which every Christian man ought to be acquainted with for his souls health to wit the Creed the Lords Prayer and the Ten Commandments are here at least summarily comprized Our blessed Saviour telleth us the whole Law is reducible to these two great Commandments the love of God and our neighbour both which are here amply taught us The Lords Prayer is intimated in that we must aske according to Gods will which cannot be unlesse according to that patterne yea in that we are called sonnes of God it teacheth us to cry Our Father and that chief Petition in it Forgive us our sins is once and again inculcated Finally if you please we may out of this Epistle compile a Creed not much unlike that of the Apostles no lesse justly then commonly heretofore received amongst us though now almost forgotten by us in these or the like words I believe in God the Father invisible just holy pure and faithful who knoweth all things and is no lesse Almighty to do all things who is love it self whereby he vouchsafed to make the heaven and earth And in Jesus Christ his only begotten Son who came in the flesh to wit by being conceived of the Holy Ghost and borne of the Virgin Mary and laid down his life for us being crucified dead and buried and having life in himselfe rose from the dead and ascended to heaven where he sitteth at Gods right hand is our Advocate with the Father and at that day of judgment shall come and appear again to wit to judge the quick and dead I believe in the Holy Ghost the fellowship or communion of Saints the forgiveness of sins and eternal life By this time you cannot but see beloved what a body of divinity what a treasury of spiritual knowledge this Epistle is well might Fâ—rus say Ipsam Evangelicae Doctrinae summam brevissimam complectitur the summe of Evangelical Doctrine is succinctly and yet distinctly comprehended in it and now me thinketh every one is ready to say with that Father Adoro plenitudinem sacrae Scriptura I adore and admire the fulnesse of Holy Scripture wherein every drop is as it were a rivulet every rivulet a great river and river an Ocean every branch a tree every tree an orchard an orchard a field I mean every Verse as it were a Chapter every Chapter an Epistle every Epistle a Volumne for the abundance of precious truths contained in them and yet more particularly by these considerations sufficient reason cannot but appear as for my discussion so your attention and thus this discourse serveth to make way for the following But before I begin I have one request to make to you and that from my very soule that as I hope you have not are not so you will not be wanting in your requests to God for me and what you should aske for me I shall not go out of this Epistle to tell you even that unction from the Holy One whereby we may know all things that anoynting which teacheth us all things and is truth and no lie Let this be the matter of your prayer both for me for your selves that it may teach me how to expound apply you how to hear receive both you me how to understand and obey the sacred saving truths which are delivered to us in this First General Epistle of St JOHN I shall not at this time enter upon the Epistle it self only in a few words take notice of the Title which is prefixed wherein we have two things considerable Namely The pâ—nman John and the writing which is set down for the nature of it to be an Epistle for the order the first and for the extent of it a general Epistle First The Epistle is asserted to be St. JOHNS Indeed we do not finde him setting down his Name in any part of the Epistle the other Apostles are express in this particular Iames and Peter and Iude and Paul in all Epistles except that to the Hebrewes but Saint IOHN in this Epistle is altogether silent in the other two he only giveth himself the common title of an Elder when he hath any occasion to mention himself in his Gospel and that in things much tending to his dignity it is done in a third person by way of circumlocution only in his Apocalypse he specifieth his Name but that without any addition of honour or dignity It lets us see in general the humility of this holy Apostle who thought so meanly of himself that he accounts himself not worth the naming Indeed on the one hand though it s often too true of many who arrogantly affect to blazon their own names and titles we are not to imagine that when the other Apostles prefixe their namâ—s and most of them their high calling that it is done out of vain glory But on the other hand we may justly conclude it a testimony of great humility in this Apostle that he suppresseth his Name his Office by silence Thus whilest he was high in Christs he became lowly in his own eyes whilest he was rich in grace his veâ—y Name carrying as it were grace as Benjamines sack did money in its mouâ—h he was poor in spirit scarce thinking himself worthy of a name Oh let us learn by his pattern not to affect our own praises nor speak high things of our selves ever remembring that as artis est celare artem it is an art to conceal our art so to neglect our own names and honour is the best way to true honour and a good name Besides this notion of humility it may further be conceived and not improbably that this concealment of his Name was an act of prudence especially considering the time when it is most rationally conjectured to be written to wit as the learned English Annotatour hath observed to my hand not long before the destruction of Ierusalem when as the Church was under a sharp persecution occasioned no doubt by those many Antichrists then arising in which S. IOHN was peculiarly involved yea of which he warneth those to whom he writeth and therefore wisely forbeareth to publish his Name which might have been prejudicial to him There is no doubt a policy consistent with piety which as all Christians so Ministers may use in persecuting times It was that our Saviour at least allowed his
the body without the soul is corporally so the soul without Christ is spiritually dead and alas whilest we are in this estate we are without all hope of life being under the sentence not onely of the first but second death and therefore Iohn the Baptist saith expressely he that believeth not the Son shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him oh heavy load and unsupportable weight which upon whomsoever it abideth must needs crush him to peices and sink him to the depth of Hell Oh labour we then both in respect of our selves and others to be sensible of our natural estate and if we mourn over our friends dead bodies much more should we mourn over theirs and our dead soules 2. To seek after this life because it is eternal and to seek it by union with Christ who is the life Indeed this temporal life may be used but onely that eternal life is to be sought the life that now is is a fleeting shadow a vanishing vapour a day which though never so pleasant cannot be long but the life which is to come is a light ever shining a leaf never fading and such a day as shall know no evening and now tell me which is most rational to seek after that life which is lost almost as soon as it is found or after that life which being once found can never be lost to catch after that which being got we cannot hold or that which being once got we cannot lose and therefore that I may allude to our blessed Saviours expression labour not for that which perisheth but for that life which endureth to eternity To this end let it be our continued care to gain to assure our interest in and union with Christ the Shunamite went to the Prophet for raising her dead childe we must to Christ for the quickning our dead souls it is very observable what St. Peter saith to this purpose To whom coming as to a living stone we also are built up as lively stones so that if you know how we become living stones it is by coming to and being built upon Christ as our foundation the soul cannot enliven the body till infused into and united with it nor can we receive life from Christ but by an interest in him he that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood saith Christ himself hath eternal life there is life eternal life in the flesh and blood of Christ but then we must eat and drink it that so this spiritual food may be incorporated into us and we made one with Christ. 3. Lastly to set an high value upon Christ and give him the glory of this great mercy even eternal life of all the Titles that do express the personall excellencies of the Lord Christ that of the word is most glorious and of all those that do express the priviledges we have by him none so comprehensive as this of eternal life To you who believe saith the Apostle concerning this living stone he is pretious and well he may since he bestoweth so rare a Iewel and so invaluable a pearle as eternal life upon us indeed all our good and comfort is wrapt up in Christ he is the bread to nourish us the light to guide us the life to save us are then any beginnings of this life wrought in us any hopes of it assured to us let us look upon our selves as vessels filled by this fountain stars enlightned by this Sun carcases enlivened by this spirit acknowledging what we have and hope for to be onely and wholly from Christ that as we have life from him he may have thanks from us Now to him who is the life that eternal life be praise and glory in the Church throughout all ages Amen THE FIRST EPISTLE OF St. IOHN CHAP. I. Ver. 2. 2. For the life was manifested and we have seen it and bear witness and shew unto you that eternal life which was with the father and was manifested unto us AMong the mystical interpretations of those four living creatures mentioned in Ezekiel and the Apocalyps that of resembling by them the four Evangelists is the most usual among the Antients and St. Iohn is compared to the Eagle by them all except Iraeneus who likeneth him to the Lion St. Hieroms reason is from the Eagles wing which soareth highest of any bird St. Gregories from the Eagles eye which is able to look upon the Sun and both very apposite for so doth St. Iohn in his Gospel look upon the Sun of righteousnes and so are high in contemplation of his Divinity nor is this lesse observable in this Epistle than in his Gospel which both beginneth and closeth with the Deity of Christ Indeed we have here in this beginning both the God-head and Man-hood of the Messiah and the union of both in one person set before us when he saith That which was from the beginning c. The second Character here given and which now followeth to be handled is of Christ as God in those words which was with the Father It is the same no doubt in sense with that in the Gospel and the word was with God and to this purpose Theodoret applyeth that of the Psalmist With thee is the fountain of Life For the better explanation of it we must take notice of the Noun the Praeposition and the Veâ—â— â—ather with the Father was with the Father 1. By the Father we are here no doubt to understand the first person in the sacred Trinity Indeed it is a word that is taken in Scripture both 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 essentially and personally essentially it is common to all the persons personally it is onely true of the first when it is used of God in respect to the Creatures it is to be understood essentially and our Apostle so intends it when he saith Behold what manner of love the Father hath showed that we should be called the Sons of God But when of God in order to the persons it is to be construâ—â— personally as here and in the next verse it is manifestly so used And the first person is called the Father say some because he is the original of the Trinity as connoting the relation he hath both to the Son and the Holy Ghost but â—hy others more properly the first person iâ— the Father onely in relation to the second who is his begotten after the most perfect way of Generation and so he only a Father in regard of him But further 2. The chief thing considerable is what this meaneth that Christ the life is said to be with the Father The answer to which I shall lay down both negatively and affirmatively 1. Negatively we must not strain the expression too far as noting either an inferiority or separability between those two persons of the Father and the Word 1. Not a separability as if Christ were so with that he were without the
which he hath appointed us to walk in to wit of purity and holiness and thus let us walk as fast as we can and aspire as high as we may till we come to the utmost degree of conformity which our created and finite nature is capable of and whereas man desiring to walk in the light of Gods knowledge fell from his estate of innocency our endeavour to walk in the light of his purity will restore us to that state of integrity which here inchoated shall be hereafter consummated To end all put both these parts together we must walk in the light as he is in the light and this double consectary will naturally flow 1. True conversion maketh a manifest and wonderful alteration the Poet speaking of a grafted tree saith Miraturque novas frondes non sua poma It wondreth at those new leaves and fruits with which it is adorned so do Converts themselves and all that behold them wonder at the change which is wrought in them every man by his first birth is still-born dead in sin by his new birth he becometh alive to God as the Father said of the prodigal this my son was dead and is alive and surely what a difference was between Lazarus lying dead in the grave and Lazarus standing alive on his feet the same is between a natural and a regenerate man Every man naturally walketh in darknesse and is a slave to the Prince of darkness every Convert walketh in the light as he is in the light so that look what alteration there is in the same ayre by the arising of the Sun the like is in the same person by the infusion of holiness 2. That the works of Christianity is attended with no small difficulty Ah Lord how light do most men make of their general calling how easy a matter do they account it to get to heaven but surely they are such whom the devill casts into a sad sleep and sootheth up with fond dreams who can read that general assertion of our Saviour straight is the gate and narrow is the way that leadeth to life yea this more particular delineation of that way by the Apostle to be a walkâ—ng 〈◊〉 the light as he is in the light and not work out his salvation with fear and trembling Brethren if we intend to enjoy communion with God we must walk not sit there is no stepping out of the worlds ease into Gods rest yea we must walk upwards ascend to divine perfection there is no comming to heaven pâ—r saltum but per scansum it is no leaping thither in a moment in a word if it be no easy thing to be holy it must needs be difficult to be happy And therefore let us in a sence of the works difficulty together with our own impotency make our addresses to the Throne of Grace and that both for the light wherein we are to walk and the feet which may enable us to walk in this light pray we that he would by his preventing grace infuse the habit of holiness into our hearts and then by his assisting grace strengthen us to act that holinesse in our lives Finally according to the councel of that devout ancient when we first set foot upon the ladder of piety considering our deficiency and Gods excellency let us stretch forth our hands to him who is at the top of the ladder saying with the Spouse draw me and we will run after thee so shall we at the last come to him and be with him in the light of purity and glory for ever THE FIRST EPISTLE OF St. IOHN CHAP. I. Ver. 7. But if we walk in the light as he is in the light we have fellowship one with another and the blood of Iesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin THE life of man on earth is a race and every one in this world a Traveller The wayes in which all men walk are fitly and fully enumerated to be two the one on the right the other on the left hand so much Pythagoras his Y imports the one a straight and narrow way the other a wide and broad way so our blessed Saviour plainly asserts the one a lightsom the other a dark path as S. Iohn here insinuateth Hence it is that all men who either have been are or shall be are marshald into two ranks sheep and goats the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent the righteous and the wicked In Italy after the Guelphs and the Gibellines there arose two factions which were called the Albi and the Atri the white and the black these two indeed divide the whole world all men being children of God or of the devil such as walk in the light and such as walk in darknesse These two wayes are so directly contrary in their natures that though a man may go out of the one into the other yet it is impossible he sâ—ould at once walk in both and therefore St. John sets the one in a manifest Antithesis to the other But if we walk in the light nor are they lesse contrary in their ends then in their natures the one leadeth to life the other to destruction so Christ expressely the one causeth a separation between God and us and therefore they lye who walking in darkness say they have fellowship with God the other leadeth to communion with God and an interest in Christ so it is affirmed in the words of the Text. But if we walk c. Having dispatched the qualification which respects our duty passe we now on to the Collation which representeth Gods mercy and that in respect of two excellent benefits here specified namely fellowshâ—p with God and cleansing by Christ the one in those words We have fellowshâ—p one with another the other in those and the blood of Iesus Christ his Son cleanseth from all sin of each in their order 1. The first of these benefits namely our fellowship with God hath been already explicated from the third verse and therefore I shall not need here to insist upon it Indeed the phrase one with another seemeth to intimate another kind of fellowshâ—p then that before handled namely that fellowship which those who walk in the light have one with another but the connexion will by no means admit this interpretation this fellowship of them that walk in the light being an inference from the consideration of Gods being light and therefore must be understood of the fellowship they have with him Sutable to this it is that Grotius and Doctor Hammond observe the space in the Kings manuscript to be so little that it may more probably be supposed as left for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 then 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But our Greek copies do plainly read it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so it may as Beza and others observe admit a very fit exposition in reference to God we have fellowship one with another that
reason why we may not as wel expound the 10. by the 8. as the 8. by the 10. besides it is an usuall hebraeisme which kind of phrase our Apostle much followeth to put the preterperfect tense for the present therefore it is more rationall to expound those words we have not sinned by those we have no sin then these by those and so this assertion is verified concerning all Christians not only before but after conversion indeed this is not mine but St. Austins note upon the 8 verse St. John doth not say if we say we had but have no sin indeed there are two places in this epistle which seeme to contradict this construction of these words the one where he saith he that is borne of God cannot sin and the other not much unlike where he saith that which is borne of God sinneth not What the full sense of these Scriptures is I shall God willing insist upon in their proper placesâ— for the present it may suffice to answer either with St. Austin that he who is born of God sinneth not to wit as he is born of God Regenerate men being therefore subject to sin because but in part regenerate and that holy men fall into sin is because of the remainders of the old man not so far as their natures are renewed or else as St. John seemeth to expound himselfe in the one place that he who is born of God doth not sin that is doth not commit sin which being a synonimous phrase with working iniquity is onely true of unregenerate persons and in the other place that he who is born of God sinneth not that sin of which he there speaketh in particular namely the sin unto death notwithstanding which it still remaineth as a truth that even they who are borne of God cannot say they have no sin at all 2. This totall immunity from sin is denyed not onely of ordinary but eminent even the holyest Saints that have been are or shall be The We of whom my Text speaketh were the Apostles who as they were dignified in office above others so no doubt they obtained greater measure of grace then others yea he that includeth himselfe in the number was St. John who of all the Apostles was most beloved of Christ and as St. Austin excellently Who can say he is without sin when he that leaned in the bosome of Christ saith If we say we have no sin Indeed as Jehu wrote to the rulers of Iezreel in another case look out even the best and meetest of your Masters Sonnes I may say in this looke out even the best and holyest of Gods children see if any of them can or dare wholly acquit themselves from sin the truth is as that forementioned Father saith If we shall ask all the Patriarchs Prophets Apostles Martyrs de sepissi dum in hoc corpore degerent una voce concorditer responderent they would with one consent say of themselves as living on earth in these words If we say we have no sin we deceive our selves To this purpose is the observation of Beza and Zanch. upon the text Consider who it is that here speaketh and that in his own person who then can be excepted out of the catalogue It is true there is one whom he calleth in the next chapter Iesus Chrâ—st the righteous who is most justly to be excepted of him it is said He did all things well Himselfe maketh the challeng Which of you can convince me of sins he was no doubt altogether free from the least spot or staine of corruption but as for any other exception this generall rule admits none I know the papists contend very earnestly that the Mother might be exempted as well as the Son asserting her to be free from all kind of sin It is true St. Austin in one place speaking of the saints sinfulnesse doth except her but not in their senâ—se as if she were not a sinner but for the honour of Christ he would not have her mentioned as a sinner and therefore elsewhere he is cleare and expresse that all are sinners except the one onely mediator between God and man nor need we feare to injure the blessed Virgin in joyning her with the rest when as her selfe calling Christ her Saviour acknowledgeth her selfe to be a sinner indeed that her conception of Christ should be without sin was needful but that she her selfe should be without all sin was not necessary nor doth the Scripture or the ancient Church affirme Clement Alexandrinus is expresse onely the word is without fault and St. Basil the Scripture beareth witnesse onely to one that he knew no sin Tertullian expressely our Lord commandeth his disciples to pray forgive us our trespasses as knowing himselfe onely without sin I shut up this with St. Ieroms saying If there be any who may attain to this state of perfect purity he must be holyer then any nay then all the Apostles 3. This perfect freedome from sin is not denyed de suturo but de praesenti of the future but onely the present time Our Apostle doth not say If we say we shal have no sin nay it is an undoubted verity there will be a time when we shall sin no more yea when sin shall be no more As man in his created estate had a posse non peccare a possibility of not sinning so in his glorified condition he shall have a non posse peccare an impossibility of sinning But now as in his fallen estate he cannot say he doth any good so in his renewed condition he cannot say he hath no evill Alexander Alensis starteth an objection of Pelagius seemingly very accute nay solid that either God would have us without sin or he would not to say he would not have us without sin were to deny his nature contradict his word which calleth upon us to sin no more If he would have us without sin then surely we may be so since the Divine Will cannot be conversant about impossibilities To which he returneth this answer and that very aptly to our present purpose God would have us without sin quantum ad futurum statum as to the future but not as to our present state And if you desire a fuller untying of the knot be pleased to know that 1. Voluntate praecepti God calleth upon us to be perfect as he is perfect and requireth us to lay apart all filthinesse nor is it unjust for him to command that which we might once have done but now through our own default cannot and so is impossible not per se but per accidens in its own nature but accidently yea in wisdome he commands men not to sin though he know they cannot but sin that in the disobedient he may punish not the cannot but the will not thereby glorifying his justice and in the obedient he may reward the willing to doe what they cannot and so glorifie
being the impulsive cause from within moving God to make that Covenant But though it be of grace yet it is still a Covenant and therefore as in all Covenants there is a mutual obligation on both parties between whom the Covenant is made so is it in this wherein is signified as what God will do for us so what he will have done by us Hence it is that we find not only in the Law but Gospel commands as well as comforts precepts as promises yea these promises still proposed conditionally for so we may observe among other places in this Chapter and particularly in this verse wherein remission is annexed to confession If we confess our sins he is faithful c. Having already dispatched the duty in an absolute consideration as it is the matter of a precept we are now to handle the relative as it is the condition of a promise the prosecution of which shall be done two wayes 1. Negatively it is not a cause but only a condition of the promise and therefore it is not said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because but if we confess our sins indeed if confession be a cause of remission it must be either meritorious or instrumental but it is not it cannot be either of these 1. Confession is not cannot be a meritorious cause of forgiveness it is satisfaction not confession which merits remission and therefore with men forgiveness upon meer acknowledgment is an act not of equity but of charity in this regard the merit of remission is Christs not ours his blood whereby he hath made satisfaction not our tears which are only the concomitant of confession True it is there is a congruity in confession inasmuch as it maketh us fit for but there is no condignity to render us deserving of this mercy of forgiveness It may perhaps be here inquired why since the commission of sin is meritorious of punishment the confession is not of pardon for if the sin be therefore of so great a desert because against God why shall not the acknowledgement be of as great merit because to God The answer to which is iustly returned partly that whereas our Commissions are purely sinful our confessions are not purely penitent since even when we confess our sins we sin in confessing partly that whereas the demerit of the fault is chiefly respectu objecti in regard of the person to whom the injury is done the amends for the fault is respectu subjecti principally considerable in respect of the person by whom it is made and hence it is that though the sin committed by us bee of infinite demerit because against an infinite justice yet nothing done by us can bee of infinite merit because wee are finite persons 2. Confession is not the instrumentall cause of forgivenesse to clear this the more be pleased to know that there is a great deale of difference between that which is meerely conditionall and that which is so a condition as it is withall an instrument that may be a necessary condition which is onely required to the qualification of the subject on whom the thing is conferred but that which is not onely a condition but an instrument hath some kinde of influence into the Production of the thing which is conferred and this being well observed will serve excellently to clear that Orthodox doctrine of justification by faith alone we are justified a chiefe ingredient whereof is forgivenesse of sinnes onely by faith not by repentance not by charity nor by any other grace or work because it is onely faith which concurreth as an instrument to this work in as much as it is the hysope sprinkling the soul with the bloud the hand applying to the soule the righteousnesse of Christ for which wee are forgiven and justified and hence it is that the preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is onely used concerning faith hee is the propitiation for our sinnes through faith and we are justified by faith whereas it is never said wee are justified by confessing or forgiving or repenting though yet still these are conditions of justification and forgivenesse in as much as they are necessary qualifications required in the person whom God doth justify and to whom sinne is forgiven 2. Affirmatively it is a condition and that both exclusive and inclusive 1. It is an exclusive condition this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this si as nisi if otherwise not there is no forgivenesse to bee had without confession though it be not that for which no nor yet by which yet it is that without which no remission can be obtained I thinke it is needlesse to dispuâ—e what God could doe by his absolute power it is enough hee cannot doe â—t by his actuall because he will not truly though theâ—e is no need of any yet there is abundant reason of this divine pleasure since it is that which his justice his purity and his wisedome seem to call for Justice requireth satisfaction much more confessiion If God shall pardon them which doe not confesse but conceal and goe on in sinne it would open a gap to all prophanesse and impiety which cannot consist with his purity finally it cannot stand with Gods wisedome to bestow mercy but on them that are in some measure sitted for it and wee are not cannot be sitted for remâ—ssion till we have practised confession None are fitioâ— mercy but they who see theâ—r need of it hunger after it and know how to value it whereas if God should offer pardon to an impenitent he would scarce accept it how ever hee would not prize it It is confession which maketh us taste the bitternesse of sin and so prepareth us for a relish of the sweetnesse of forgiving mercy The exclusivenesse of this condition is that which Solomon expresseth when hee opposeth hiding to confessing and as hee assureth mercy to the one so hee flatly denyeth it to the other he that hideth his sin shall not prosper and to this purpose it is that Almighty God threatneth I will goe and returne to my place till they acknowledge their offence and seeke my faâ—e in which doneâ— is manifestly intimated a nisi untill that is unlesse they acknowledge I will not vouchsafe my gracious presence to them yea this is that which David found verified in his own experience where he saith when I kept silence my bones waxed old day and night thy hand was heavy upon mee I acknowledged my sinne and thou forgavest unlesse the sore be opened and the corrupt matter let out the party cannot be healed when the ague breaketh forth at the lips then there is hope of its cessation If the Apostume break and come not forth at the eares or mouth the patient is but a dead man till that which oppresseth the stomach be cast up there can bee no ease and unlesse there be a penitent laying open of our sinnes
God is reconciled to us thus Durand asserteth that God forgiveth by himself releasing us from the bond of our sins and the Priest absolveth by declaring that remission to be granted And Fâ—rus though a Jesuite saith that man doth not properly forgive but only assure that God hath forgiven look as the Priest in the law was said to cleanse the leper because he did pronounce him clean saith the Master of the sentences so do the Ministers of the Gospel forgive bâ—cause they pronounce to us that God forgiveth and in this sence our Church understood it and therefore saith in the form of absolution he hath given power and commandment to his Ministers to declare and pronounce to his people being penitent the absolution and remâ—ssion of their sins Thus the Ministers are instrumental in this work and their power as appeareth by what hath been said is partly declarative and partly operative but stilâ— the princial efficient conferring this benefit is God and God alone The use therefore which we are to make of this truth is for direction and imitation 1. Be we directed whither to addresse our selves for pardon in the sence of our sins with the prodigal let us resolve to go to our Father and after Davâ—ds pattern let us implore Gods mercy Indeed since God hath set Ministers in his Church for this end that by their help we may obtain the pardon of our sins and the comfortable assurance of it we must not neglect much lesse despise their assistance and whereas what others do only in a way of charity they do in a way of authority having power committed to them for this end we must prefer their help before what private Christians can afford us In which respect I dare boldly affirm that many people want that comfortable sence of the pardon of their sins which they might attain to did they consult with a faithful Minister declare their sins together with their repâ—ntance to him earnestly and humbly desiring a declarative absolution from him But yet before and above all other means let us seek God by prayer and wrestle with him for this great mercy our Church hath taught her Ministers when they absolve to prefixe a prayer to Christ that he would absolve a poor penitent and as you desire absolution from the Minister so you must direct your prayer to God that he would speak peace to you so much the rather because though he is pleased ofttimes by his Ministers to give case to burthened sinners and accordingly we are to make use of them for that end yet the conscience can find no ease from the Minister unlesse he be pleased by the inward testimony of his spirit to seal a pardon to it so true is that of Elihu when he giveth quietnesse who then can make trouble and when he hideth his faâ—e who then can behold him 2. Be we exhorted to imitate God in this gracious act he forgiveth our sins against him let us forgive the injuries others do against us this was S. Pauls counsel to the Ephesians and that upon this very ground Be you kind one to another tender-hearted forgiving one another even as God for Christs sake hath forgiven you where the as is both modall and causall As to wit in the same manner as God doth forgive us we must others Indeed the parallell holds not every way for whereas God doth not forgive sins but to those that confâ—sse and bemoan them we are bound to forgive those who do not confesse but persist in their offering wrong to us according to the precept of blessing them that curse us And this by the way would be taken notice of in Answer to that Socinian argument against satisfaction from the parallell of Gods forgiving and mans since by the same reason that they say God should forgive without satisfaction because he requires man to do so they may as well say he should forgive without confession It is not then in every respect that this simâ—litude agrees buâ— as God when he forgiveth is fully reconciled forgetting all that is past as if it had not been without any desire of nay resolving against all future revenge ita purè perfectè so purely perfectly saith Anselm ought we to forgive our brethren And as thus in the same manner so likewise on this ground and so the as is causal because God for Christs sake forgiveth us we for Gods sake ought to forgive one another we find the Lord in the parable wroth with his servant to whom he had pardoned all his debt because he was so cruel not to forgive his fellow-servant and we pray in the Lords prayer for forgivenesse of our trespasses as we forgive others so necessary a connexion is there betwixt these two that our forgâ—venesse is a condition of Gods and Gods is to be a cause of ours Thus God doth seem as it were to put it in our power whether or no we will have our sins forgiven by making our forgivenesse a condition of it and as at first he made us after his own likenesse so he still taketh care that we may become like to him And surely as it is Gods goodnesse to require no more from then what he performeth to us so is it but reason we should at his command perform that to others which we expect from him and so much of the first the principal efficient He. 2. The internall impulsive causes here specified are two to wit Gods faithfulnesse and justice and these I may well call the two pillars which like Jachim and Boaz support our faith compare to the two Cherubâ—ns which look toward the mercy seat whence pardon is vouchsafed resemble to the two olive trees whence floweth the oyle or the two breasts which yield the milk of heavenly consolation to troubled consciences 1. The first here mentioned is Gods fidelity he is faithfull for the opening whereof be pleased to observe 1. That God hath made many promises of forgiving sins and cleansing from iniquity to those that acknowledge them to this purpose St. Cyprian saith Christ teaching us to pray for assures us God hath made promise of forgiving our trespasses Indeed God hath no where promised peccanâ—â—â—rastinum to morrow to the peccant but every where poenitenti veniam pardon to the repentant If my people shall humble themselves and pray I will hear from heaven and forgive their sins so we read in the Chronicles â—et the wicked forsake his way and the unrighteous man his thoughts and let him return unto the Lord and he will have mercy upon him and to our God for he will abundantly pardon so runs the promise in Isaiah If the wicked will turn from all the sins that he hath committed all his transgressions they shall not be mentioned to him so saith God by the Prophet Ezechiel Thus I might bring forth a Iury of textual witnesses to prove this assertion but those already mentioned
stone is one and very apt to our present purpose Since as in respect of Satan He is lapis triumphalis a stone of victory and triumph dashing that Goliah in the forehead so in respect of God he is lapis foedificus a stone of league and amity such as that between Laban and Iacob or rather lapis angularis a corner stone for as this uniteth the walâ— which were one seperate from the other together so doth he unite and that not onely Iewes and Gentiles to one another but both to God This is that truth which the Apostle Paul planly asserts in those Scriptures which speak of reconciliation to God thus he saith God was in Christ reconciling the world to himselfe and again Christ is said to reconcile both to wit Jew and Gentile unto God in one body by the crosse and againe It pleased the Father by him having made peace through the bloud of his crosse to roconcile all things to himselfe It would not be passed by what is by Socinians objected against these Scriptures that they speake onely of our being reconciled to God not of Gods being reconciled to us and so prove not any pacification of divine wrath by Christs death whence it is that they understand this reconciling of us to God to be no more then the turning of us from sin to God by true repentance But to vindicate this great truth and that as asserted in those Scriptures be pleased to consider briefly that Though the phrase onely run in this straine the reconciling us to God yet it doth not therefore follow that the reconciliation is onely on our part and not on Gods nay rather the one involveth the othâ—r since if we were not sinners there were no need of reconciling us to God and being sinners there is no lesse need of his being reconciled to us unlesse we will say that sin doth not provoke him which is to deny him to be a God And though this reconciliation being mutuall doth no lesse imply Gods to us then ours to him yet it is very fitly thus expressed because God is the pars offensa the party offended and man is pars offendens the party offending he that offendeth another is more properly said to be reconciled to him whom he hath injured then he that is offended in which respect Christ adviseth him who bringeth his gift to the altar If he remember his brother have ought against him to go and be reconciled to his brother and St. Paul wisheth the woman that departeth to be reconciled to her husband as having by departing offended him But as the reconcililing of a woman to her husband a trespasser to his brother is the paâ—ifâ—ing the one of her husbands anger the other of his brothers displeasure justly conceived against them so the reconciling us to God is the appeasing of his wrath towards us which for our sins was incensed against us And that this is St. Pauls meaning appeareth plainly in one of those forecited places where the manner how God in Christ reconcileth us to himselfe is expressed to be his not imputing our trespasses and Christ in whom we are thus reconciled is said to do it by being made sin for us It is not therefore our turning from sin to God but Christ becomming a sacrifice for our sins and Gods not imputing our sins to us for his sake which is our reconciltation to God and inasmuch as it is God who being offended receiveth us againe into favour therefore it is ascribed to him as his act and because it is Christ who hath by his death appeased Gods anger therefore it is attributed to him and so the cleare meaning of our Apostle appeareth to be the same with that which here S. Iohn asserts and intends when he saith of Christ He is the propitiation for our sins And because the Socinians being resolved to make all Scripture stoop to their reason endeavour to pervert this text as if it were onely a delivering us from the wrath to come upon impenitents by turning us from our sins Give me leave to set before you the genuine sence of this word which our Apostle here useth and that both in its native signification and legall allusion 1. If we consider this word in its native signification we shall find that the verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Text commeth in all writers both sacred and prophane Poets Oratours Historians as the learned Grotius hath observed signifieth to appease or pacify or render propitious and is usually construed with an accusative expressing the person whose anger is pacified Indeed there is one place in the Hebrewes where being joyned with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the plurall accusative it is rendred to expiate the sins of the people but either the use of the word there must be altogether different from its sence of perpetuall signification or it must signify such an expiation as tends to a pacification so it is all one whether you read it here He is the expiation or He is the propitiation since the one depends on the other and by expiating our sins it is that He propitiateth God towards us 2. If we consider this word in its legall allusion we shall find a double reference which may be made of it 1. To the mercy-seat which covered the arke where the law was whence God gave answers and from which he shewed himselfe propitious to the people whereof we read in the booke of Exodus Hence the Seventy and the Authâ—r to the Hebrews from thence cal it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a propitiatory to this the Apostle Paul manifestly alludeth where the very same word is used when he saith Him hath God set forth a propitiation and possibly St. John in this word might have the same reference Indeed Christ may well be called the propitiatory or a propitiation in allusion to the mercy-seat since there is a fit analogy between them For as it covered the Law so Christ the transgressions of the Law as thence God gave answers so by Christ his Evangelical Oracles are revealed and as from thence God shewed himselfe propicious so is he in Christ well pleased but in this last analogy in which respect it was called a propitiatory and serveth to our present purpose though there is a fitnesse yet not a fulness for whereas the mercy-seat is called the propitiatory onely because it had vim declarativam a declarative vertue to signify Christ is the propitiation as having vim effectivam an operative energy to procure divine favour and therefore was God pleased to manifest himselfe benevolous from the mercy-seat because it was a type of Christ in whom he is propitiated towards sinners In vaine therefore do the Socinians confine the antitype to the type as if that Christ must be in no other sense a propitiation then the mercy-seat was since it is sufficient to make a type