Selected quad for the lemma: sin_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
sin_n	dead_a	death_n	quicken_v	3,267	5	10.4250	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A93852	The royal law contended for, or, Some brief grounds serving to prove that the Ten Commandments are yet in full force, and shall so remain till heaven and earth pass away. Also the seventh day Sabbath, proved from the beginning, from the law, from the prophets, from Christ, from his apostles, to be a duty yet incumbent upon saints and sinners. / By a lover of peace with truth Edward Stennet.	Stennett, Edward, d. 1690?	1658 (1658)	Wing S5402B; ESTC R184622	38,860	48

the Law and in this sense every true believer doth fulfil the Law though his compleatness be in Christ for love is the fulfilling of the Law Rom. 13.10 so that the commanding power of the Law is such a just measure that every one that loves acts his part towards the fulfilling of it Lastly it further appears to be the Ten Commandments by the use Christ makes of what he had before asserted Whosoever therefore shall break one of the least of these Commendments and shall teach men so shall be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven vers 19. that is forasmuch as this Law must stand till Heaven and Earth pass and I came not to destroy it therefore beware of breaking of it for whosoever you are that break any any part of it and shall teach men so you shall be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven but whosoever shall do and teach them the same shall be called great in the Kingdom of Heaven To prevent further mistakes he repeateth the Law in many particulars and gives the sence shewing how far their righteousness should exceed the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees vers 20. By all which it plainly appears that this Law which Christ came not to destroy is the Law of the Ten Commandments or the Laws that were comprehended in them 6. The Apostle confirmeth and establisheth this Law after the death of Christ as plainly appears Rom. 3. the drift of which Chap is to set Jews and Gentiles in a like condition by nature all breakers of the Law of God and so become guilty before him vers 19. and that therefore no flesh could be justified by the deeds of the Law the Law being for another purpose to convince of sin vers 20. or to bring sin to the knowledge he proves that Jews and Gentiles circumcised and uncircumcised are justified by and through faith and not by any Law of works vers 27 28 29 30. But lest the Gentiles should think because they could not be justified by the works of the Law that therefore they might look upon the Law as a thing done away or made void he puts this question to the uncircumcised Gentiles Do we then make void the Law through faith God forbid yea we establish the Law He puts this question out of question whether the Law be in force to believing Gentiles or no with a God forbid which shews the greatness of his zeal against such a perswasion it being the same answer which he gives to another gross question whether we should continue in sin that grace might abound and as if that were not enough he adds to it yea we establish the Law 7. This same Apostle doth prove that the Law was in force at the time of his conversion he saith he had not known sin but by the Law he had not known lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not covet Rom. 7.7 He was alive without the Law once but when the Commandment came sin revived and he dyed vers 9. that is not without the letter of it for that he had and did in a great measure conform to it but without powerful convictions for sin by the Law and in this sence when the Commandment came sin revived and he dies that before was alive in his own apprehension For without the Law sin was dead vers 8. and by the Law is the knowledge of sin and sin taking occasion by the Commandment deceived him and by it slew him Wherefore the Law is holy the Commandment is holy just and good vers 11.12 not that the holy and just Law was made death unto him God forbid but sin that it might appear sin by this good Law wrought death in him that by the Commandment sin might appear exceeding sinful vers 13. And if so then this Law did not dye with the body of Christ though we are dead to the Law by the body of Christ that we should serve in newness of spirit and not in the oldnesse of the letter and that we should be married to another even him who is raised from the dead we being dead to that spirit of bondage in whith we were held that we set our obedience to the Law no longer in the room of Christ as our head and husband Christ by his blood having purchased us from that power that the Law had over us by reason of sin So that our service is not to satisfie the Law as a woman serves to please her husband that we are dead to but we are not dead to serve in newness of spirit in obedience to Christ as our husband vers 4 5 6. In this sence the Apostle delights in the Law of God after the inward man vers 22. Though another Law in his members stood in great opposition to it vers 23. Mind this chap. well and it will appear so plain that he that runs may read that the Apostle intends no such thing as to take us from our obedience to the Law nor yet the abrogating of the Law But on the contrary 8. The same Apostle urges the Law in the very letter of it unto the Ephesians Chap. 6.1 2 3. Children saith he obey your Parents for this is right Honour thy father and thy mother which is the first Commandment with promise He proves his exhortation to be right from the Commandment and he takes notice of the order of the Commandments it is the first Commandment of that second Table and it hath a promise annexed to it he speaketh in the present tense he doth not say it was the first Commandment but it is the first with promise that thy dayes may be long on the earth he urges the promise to them for their encouragement and to prevent mistakes he shews the extent of it that it was not only to the Jews that they should live long in the land of Canaan but to the Gentiles also therefore the interpretation is large that thy dayes may be long on the earth 9. James gives a full confirmation to what I am treating of chap. 2.9 He convinces them of sin by this Law in having the faith of Jesus Christ with respect of persons as appears by vers 10.11 For whosoever shall keep the whole Law and yet offend in one point he is guilty of all he shews what Law he means and how it is that he that offends in one point is guilty of all because He that saith do not commit adultery saith also do not kill now if thou commit no adultery yet if thou kill thou art become a transgressor of the Law And John saith Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the Law for sin is the transgressionof the Law chap. 3.4 and in the next verse he explains what Law he means and saith it was such transgression that Christ was manifest to take away now if this Law of God was done away by the death of Christ sin could not be a transgression of it so long after neither could any be convinced

together on the first day of the week and did break bread and Paul taught unto them Act. 20. Answ This is all the meeting or preaching that ever we find was upon the first day except the disciples being together for fear of the Jews mentioned before that meeting was at evening so this seems to be because when they came together Paul preached with them and continued his speech until midnight it is not likely then that they observed the day and came together in the morning seeing he continued his speech so long And secondly as we have the cause of the disciples being together with their doors shut so we have the cause of this meeting Paul was ready to depart on the morrow vers 7. upon an extraordinary occasion Paul having many things to communicate to them as appears by his discoursing with them till midnight and talking till break of day vers 11. But that which makes the Objecters lay such stress upon this Text is because the disciples came together to break bread which they judge to be the Lords Supper Suppose it were so what doth this make for the observation of the first day more then Christs first instituting the supper upon the fifth day of the week as is generally conceived doth make for the observation of it But there is no proof that this was the Supper of the Lord that they came to pertake of but it seems to be such breaking of bread as the margin of some Bibles refers unto Acts the 2.46 They continued dayly with one accord in the Temple and breaking bread from house to house did eat their meat with gladnesse of heart So Luc. 24.30 35. And it is explained what breaking of bread it was vers 11. where it is said when he was come up again and had broken bread and eaten and talked a good while till break of the day he departed here is eating and talking it is not solemnized as the Supper of the Lord But some would have this common breaking of bread and the other in verse 7. to be the Supper it is very unlikely that here should be two sorts of breaking of bread at one time by the same persons and yet nothing spoke distinctly by which we might know the one from the other so that the most that can be said is but a supposition it cannot be proved that this was the Lords Supper And how weak a ground this is for the observation of this day as a Sabbath or more then any other day or to limite the administration of the Supper to this day I leave to the truly wise in heart to judge Obj. But the Church had their gatherings upon the first day of the week from which it appears that it was the day that they met together upon 1 Cor. 16.2 Answ The words are these Vpon the first day of the week let every one lay by him in store as God hath prospered him that there be no gatherings when I come Here is no proof for their meeting together but rather on the contrary every one of them was to lay by him in store as God had prospered him no publique gathering but private laying up but because the Apostle saith in the close of the verse that there be no gatherings when I come therefore it is thought the Scripture cannot be so understood because it would not prevent gatherings but is this fair when a Text of Scripture stands alone to put such a sense upon it as doth plainly contradict the very letter of it when it saith let every one of you lay by him in store then to say the meaning is to have publique gatherings and but one store and would not the end of the Apostle be fully answered namely to have no gatherings if each of them did lay by them in a store as God had prospered them in the world ready against the Apostle came they knowing of his coming and when he came was it not as easie to carry it with them to him as for us to carry our Bibles to a meeting and what need would there be then of gatherings And this way of giving would not be Pharisee-like but according to the words of Christ Mat. 6.11 Take heed that you do not your alms before men to be seen of them otherwise you have no reward of your Father which is in Heaven but when thou doest thine almes let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doth vers 3. that thine almes may be in secret and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly ver 4. Obj. But John was in the spirit upon the Lords day and had that glorious revelation upon it which is conceived to be the first day of the week Rev. 1 10. Answ It is true John was in the spirit on the Lords day but the question will be what day that was if any one of the seven it must be the Sabbath for no other day is so called but it God calls it his Holy Day Isay 58.13 and Christ saith he is Lord even of the Sabbath day and if so then it is his day for he is Lord of it and that by way of eminency not as some would have it to shew that he is Lord of every day but as it is the Sabbath for so it is said the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath day So that this notion that the Lords day is the first day is meerly taken up on trust one from another without one word in the Scripture to prove it so Ob. But it wil be yet objected by those that are for no Sabbath from the words of the Apostle Col. 2.16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat or in drink or in respect of a holy day or of the new Moon or of the Sabbath days which are a shadow of things to come but the body is of Christ from whence it is concluded that the Sabbath was but a shadow The Apostle speaks here of such Sabbaths as were a shadow of things to come but the seventh day Sabbath was in commemoration of something past to wit the work of creation as appears in the Commandments and none are to be judged for not observing of it Answ There were Holy-dayes and Sabbaths besides the seventh day Sabbath or the Sabbath of the Lord thy God for so it is called in the commandment as doth appear in Levit 23.39 now because it is implyed in the words of the Apostle that Sabbaths were shadows and done away by the body of Christ doth it therefore follow that all Sabbaths were so any more then where the words of the Apostle implies that men shall be saved proves that all men shall be saved and if we consider the verses before it will plainly appear that the Apostle is not speaking of any of the Ten Commandments in the 15. verse the Apostle is speaking to the Gentiles shewing how they were dead in their sins and in the uncircumcision of their

flesh but now quickened by Christ and all their trespasses forgiven them In the 14. verse he shews what further benefit they had by the death of Christ bloting out the hand-writing of Ordinances which was against us and contrary to us he took it out of the way nailing it to his cross and the Scripture upon which the objection is bottomed hath its dependence upon this and comes in with a therefore let no man judge you in meats and drinks and so forth as though the Apostle had said forasmuch as Christ hath blotted out nailed to his cross those ordinances that were against you which are Gentiles you are not to be judged for the non-performance of them Now the Ten Commandments were never against the Gentiles nor contrary to them for the same Apostle saith the matter of them was written in their hearts as was said before and they did by nature the things contained in them and therefore they were not contrary to them but circumcision and other ordinances stood as a wall against the Gentiles which Christ brake down by taking them out of the way and nailing them to his cross having abolisht in his flesh the enmity even the Law of Commandments contained in Ordinances for to make in himself of twain one new man so making peace that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the Gross having slain the enmity thereby Eph. 2.15 16. So that it is clear the Apostle is speaking of such Commandments as are contained in Ordinances and not those Commandments that are so eminently distinguisht from Ordinances but those Ordinances which were against the Gentiles and made them and the Jews two as meats and drinks New-Moons and Holy-dayes and Sabbath dayes Christ by his blood having taken these away hath made them one but that the Ten Commandments should be struck at there is no colour in this Scripture for it or that the Sabbath should only be taken out from them nailed to the Cross with New-Moons meats and drinks and other shadows and Ordinances which were against man when as Christ saith the Sabbath was made for man so that in this place there is no proof for the abrogating of this Command of God Ob. But how is it that the Apostle saith Rom. 14.5 6. that one man observes one day above another another observes every day alike and yet he doth not blame either of them Answ I make no doubt but if the controversie here had been about the Sabbath whether it were to be observed or no but it would have been plainly exprest and not past over so slightly but the Apostle is speaking of indifferent things which men were not to be judged for their doing or not doing and not of Commandments But because it is said that some esteem every day alike therefore some conclude that this takes in the Sabbath day but we must compare Scripture with Scripture and find out such a sense as may bring them into a harmony and sometimes interpret general terms by restrictive Scriptures for instance Christ bids his disciples go preach the Gospel to every Creature we must understand it thus to every creature that is in a capacity to hear the Gospel The Apostle saith that every Creature of God is good and nothing to be refused now some are poison and are to be refused but his meaning is every Creature that is eatable is good and not to be refused So here every day is alike that is every working day which God hath made alike but the seventh day he hath sanctified and made it a Sabbath of rest and so not like the other and this interpretation is according to the Scripture Exod. 16.4 Behold I will rain bread from Heaven for you and the people shall go out and gather a certain rate every day and in verse 12. They gathered every morning every man according to his eating yet on the Sabbath day there was none to gather And in our common speech it is so we call the six dayes every day men say we work every day or we travil so far every day when they mean only the six dayes that they count working dayes So the Apostle speaking to them that kept the Sabbath speaks in the same language and we have no ground to think otherwise for there is no Scripture that we find before this that hath any seeming dislike against the observation of the Sabbath but much on the contrary Obj. Ye observe dayes and years and times and months I am afraid of you least I have bestowed upon you labour in vain Gal. 4.10 11. Answ This cannot be understood that the Apostle here strikes at the meer observation of dayes a thing of such dangerous consequence for he would not have them judged that observed one day above another in Rom. 14.5 6. and in this place he himself judges these as persons that had so far degenerated that he was afraid that he had bestowed upon them labour in vain but it is manifest that these Galatians were gone back to circumcision so were debters to the whole Law seeking justification thereby Chap. 5.2 3 4. and so they observed days and years according to the Law that was a shadow of good things to come solemnizing the days months and years with those things that were appointed for them as burnt-offerings meat-offerings the waving of the sheaf the Passeover and unleavened bread and the like as you may see at large Lev. 23.8 9 10 11. and so on for they could not be said to observe times and months and yeers according to the Law except they did such service and this gave the Apostle just ground to fear that he had bestowed on them labour in vain But to imagine that to observe the Sabbath according to the Commandment or to observe a day voluntarily to the Lord is so dangerous is contrary both to Scripture reason Obj. We which believe are entred into rest which the Sabbath was but a Type of as appears by the words of the Apostle Heb. 4.3 Answ If eternal rest by faith be the Antitype of the Sabbath the Sabbath ceased to be in force to every man so soon as they believed which is ridiculous to think and contrary to the current of Scriptures but the Apostle saith We which do believe do enter into rest for he that is entred into his rest is ceased from his own works as God did from his vers 10. Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest lest any man fall after the example of unbelief vers 11. Mind this Chap. well and I am perswaded you will see that the drift of the Apostle in mentioning the seventh day here is but to amplifie and set forth that perfect rest which they that believe do and shall enjoy of which the Land of Canaan was but a Type and to shew that Gods rest was before the Land of Canaan vers 4. and that yet there remains a rest to the people of God