Selected quad for the lemma: sin_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
sin_n	commit_v	law_n	transgression_n	6,211	5	10.5220	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A96425	The doctrines of the Arminians & Pelagians truly stated and clearly answered: or, An examination and confutation of their ancient errors, which by the Church of Christ in former ages were justly abhorred, but of late under the names of Comfortable truths to be embraced are newly published. Concerning I. The universality of Gods free-grace in Christ to mankind. II. Concerning election. III. Redemption. IV. Conversion. V. Perserverance. Wherein the principal arguments brought to maintaine the orthodox faith are propounded, and the principal objections against them answered. / By Thomas Whitfield, minister of the gospel at Bugbrook in Northampton-shire. The Tares of Arminian heresie showed in former times (and by the help of prelatical influence then given to them increasing) and now growing up so much in these; I conceive this book wherein the author doth learnedly state and confute those opinions, is very worthy the publike light. Joseph Caryll.	Whitfield, Thomas, Minister of the Gospel.; Carly, Joseph, 1602-1673.	1651 (1651)	Wing W2006; Thomason E646_7; ESTC R208798	87,011	101

insisted upon because it is one of the Arminians strong holds Object 6 If the decree of election be absolute without any foresight of sin then such also is the decree of reprobation then as God hath decreed the end so he hath decreed the meanes namely the fall of man and so he shall be the authour of sin Answ Though where he decrees the end he decrees the means also yet he doth not decree to work all the means but only such as are agreeable to his own nature It follows not therfore though God hath decreed Adams fall that he is the authour of it because he hath not decreed to work it but onely to permit it that God decreed to permit the fall is plain because otherwise it could not have come to passe for nothing can come to passe against Gods will And none can deny that God could hinder the fall if he would If therefore he would not hinder it he was willing it should be And the Arminians themselves grant that God gave to man sufficient grace but not effectuall for then he had actually stood now if he did deny him effectuall grace without which he saw certainly that he would fall being tempted to what end or purpose did he deny him this effectuall grace but that by permitting of his fall he might make way for the manifestation of his justice and mercy 2. In mans first transgression by eating the forbidden fruit as in all other sinfull acts there was natures work and so Gods worke for though the deformity was from man yet the act it selfe was from God in whom we live and move and what God doth in time he hath determined to do before all time therefore the fall must needs be decreed Object But here not only the manner of eating but the very eating it selfe was forbidden and therefore sinfull Answ Yet in this eating we must distinguish betwixt the eating it selfe and the vitiosity of it as being things in their own nature separable and distinct otherwise they might be praedicated the one of the other which they cannot be for the vitiosity is only an accident to the act of eating And it cannot be denyed that God doth concurre in the act and is the authour of that as he is the authour of every naturall act and therefore if the vitiosity could not be separated from it he should be the authour of that also Object God doth indeed decree to concurre with reasonable creatures in their actions but this is conditionally modo ipsi velint so they themselves will do this or that Answ God did concurre with man not only in the outward act of eating but in the inward act whereby he willed to eat for not only the hand and mouth but the minde and will move by him suppose that he did decree to concurre with man in the outward act of eating upon condition that man did will to eat yet upon what condition did he decree to concurre with him in this act of his will if it shall be said on this condition if man himselfe would it may as well be said that God did decree to make man eat so be it that he hid eat what need he to concurre with him in the act of his will when man willed the thing already 3. It follows no more that God is the authour of sin by decreeing this sin then by decreeing other sins now it is plain that he decreed the death of Christ for it s said that Herod Pontius Pilate and the people were gathered to gether to do whatsoever his hand and counsell had determined should be done against Christ Act 4.27 28. therefore the crucifying of Christ was determined and decreed of God and what greater wickednesse then those things which Herod Pilate and the Jews did against Christ Object But Gods decree is an energeticall decree and what he decrees he effectually procures to come to passe neither is his permission such a bare permission wherein he hath not a working hand as those hold who hold the absolute decree Answ It cannot be denyed that God hath a working hand in the sin that man commits for the Scripture plainely affirms thus much the Lord saith that he would harden Pharoahs heart Exod. 7.3 and that he had hardned it 10.1 He threatens to David that what David had done in secret he would do in the sight of the sunne speakeing of Absoloms sin with his fathers Concubines 2 Sam. 12.12 compared with 16.12 and he gave up the Gentiles to vile affections Rom. 1.28 and many other like expressions whereby it appears that there was more then a bare permission in the committing of these sinnes yet it followes not hence that God is the authour of sinne Quest How can God be free from blame if he works with man in the same blame-worthy action Because he works in a divers manner Answ As the law works in sin so God works for it is Gods agent and instrument that the law hath a work in sin appeares because it is said that where there is no law there is no transgression Rom. 4.15 and that when the Commandement came sin revived Rom. 7.9 yea the Gospell it selfe is the savour to death to some 2 Cor. 2.16 yet here neither Law nor Gospell are faulty causes of these things because they are onely causes by accident and do not per se in themselves and their owne nature tend to these ends but to the contrary the law tends to keep men from sin and the Gospell to bring life though by accident they worke sin and death God hardned Pharaohs heart not by instilling any hardnesse into it but by giving Pharaoh a charge and command to let his people go the command was good and in it self tended to a good end namely to make Pharaoh yeeld obedience and do his duty and it was good in God to propound this command and yet by accident it did irritate and stir up the stubbornnes and rebellion of Pharaohs heart so as he was hardned more then before He that stops a running stream hereby causeth the water to rise higher not by putting any more water to it but by stopping the course of that which runs already A Physitian by prescribing wholsome Physick to a distempered body may cause greater sicknes yea somtimes death yet here neither physick nor Physitian are justly to be blamed The Sun by the same beams raiseth a sweet smell from a Garden and an ill smell from a dunghill yet no fault in the Sun He that in felling of Wood by the slipping of the iron from the helve should slay his Neighbour Deut. 19.5 was the cause of his Neighbours death but not a faulty cause because only a cause by accident not intending it but man is causaper se of the sin he commits 2. Because man works to a divers end For God wrought with Iacobs sons in selling their brother into Egypt for it s said that he sent a man before them Psalm 105.17 but he had

another end in it then they had they did it out of envy to avenge themselves of their brother but he out of love for the advancing of Ioseph and preservation of his father and brethren Ashur was Gods Axe and Saw Esa 10.5 therefore wrought not alone without a hand guiding him yet he aimed at destruction God at correction Therfore it is said that Ashur was Gods rod yet he thought not so but imagineth to destroy and cut off Nations Esa 10.7 God oftentimes punisheth one sin with another thus Arminius himself confesseth that God permitted Ahab to murder Naboth that so he might fulfil the measure of his sins which is the most grievous punishment but to punish is an act of justice Therefore here God did so permit as withall he did work 3. There is no Law to tye God from the permitting of sia and from working with man in the same action which man doth sinfully for if there were then no sin at all should be committed for man is bound not onely not to commit it but not to permit it if it be in his power to hinder it by which law if God himself were bound there should never any sin at all be committed therfore it is no good Argument to reason from man to God in those things which man doth sinfully he not being subject to the same law Object But he is a law to himself the justice and holines of his nature being stronger then any law to keep him from doing evill Answ But he may work in the same action with man and what man doth ill he may do well because as already hath been shewed he works upon other grounds in another manner and to other ends then sinfull man doth He hardned Pharaohs heart but in another manner then Pharaoh did he sent Ioseph into Egypt but to another end then his brethren did he punished Israel by Ashur but to another end then Ashur did it He delivered his Sonne to be crucified but to another end then the wicked Jews did it Object But causa causae est causa causati the cause of a cause is the cause of the effect also which ariseth from that cause removens prohibens c. that which with-holdeth or taketh away a thing which being present wold hinder an event is the cause of that event as he that with-draweth a Pillar from a House that is ready to fall without it is the cause of the fall of that House but the want of supernaturall grace and of that power which being granted would keep men from falling into sin is the cause of their falling into sin and God is the cause of this want who denies to reprobates this supernatural grace and withholds this power whereby they should be kept from falling into sin therefore he is a true and proper cause of their sinne Answ God gave to Adam in the first Creation power wherby he might have stood he gave him posse si vellet as Divines speak for he created him in righteousnesse and true holinesse Ephes 4.24 which habituall righteousnesse was a power whereby the faculties of his soul were fitted to work according to the rule of righteousnesse both by abstaining from evill and doing of good and in Adam he gave this to all his posterity who were in the same covenant with him 2. Man did willingly lose this power and habituall righteousnes which God gave him in the first Creation God did not so take it away from him but he himself also cast it away yea God withdrew no thing which he had bestowed on him till man had merited such withdrawing Had God taken away originall righteousnes from man against his will or without his desert then might there have beene some shew of injustice but there was no such matter for God had made man righteous but he found out many inventions Ecclesiastes 7. last Object But Gods will is the only cause why the guilt of Adams sin rests not only on himself but his posterity also and why they are deprived of that originall righteousnesse which was bestowed on him Answ It is a just cause but not the only cause but Adams will which willingly yeelded to that sin which was the meritorious cause of the punishment that came both on himself and his posterity which punishment was justly inflicted not only on himself but his posterity because they being in his loins were to be considered as a part of himself and he being the head of mankind both might and did enter into such a covenant with God as should bind not only himself but all those which should arise from him Hence it is that the Apostle saith that by one man sin entred into the World and death by sin and so death passed over all men for that all bad sinned Rom. 5.12 all men had sinned in that sin of one man and therefore death came justly on all men and further it is said by the offence of one judgment came on all to condemnation Object If Reprobation be without foresight of the fall then God doth destinate or appoint the innocent or guiltlesse Creature to destruction which is such cruelty and injustice as can in no sort agree to God Answ It doth not follow for Reprobation is such a decree wherby God appoints not innocent and guiltlesse but sinfull and wicked creatures to be destroyed for he hath appointed such to be destroyed as are destroyed but none are destroyed that are not sinfull and wicked before they be destroyed and this sin and wickednes is a cause of their destruction yet though this be a cause of their destruction and goes before that it is no cause of the decree whereby they are appointed to destruction neither doth●t go before that because the decree of God is from all eternity whereas mans sin is committed in time As on the other side God doth save none but such as live holily and obey his Commands and doth decree to save onely such as these yet though holines and obedience go before salvation they do not go before Election which is Gods purpose and decree of salvation so it is here though sin goes before the execution yet not before the decree that was from all Eternity That the foresight of sinne is not the cause of reprobation is thus proved 1. No temporall thing can be the cause of that which is Eternall but sin is a temporall thing there being no sin before the world was and the decree of God is Eternall 2. The foresight of sin is no more efficacious to move God to appoint some to be vessels of wrath then the foresight of good works is to move him to appoint others to be vessels of mercy God being in his own nature no lesse prone to shew forth mercy by bestowing reward then to shew his justice by punishing but the foresight of good works is not the cause of Election 3. How can the foresight of sin be the cause of reprobation when as the foresight

Christs death is spoken of should be taken in any other then a literall sense but why may he not as well count it blasphemy to deny that the bread in the Sacrament is properly Christs body because he saith this is my body or to deny that Christ is properly a branch a corner stone a morning starre and such like because the Scripture expresseth him by these names 2. Himselfe acknowledgeth that although the Scripture in speaking of Christs death sometimes and in some places useth generall expressions yet in other places it useth expressions wherein that generality is limited as when it is said that he gave his life a ransome for many Mat. 20.28 this is my bloud that is shed for the sinnes of many Mat. 26.28 he was set or appointed for the rising of many Luke 2.34 the gift by Jesus Christ hath abounded to many Rom. 5.15 he was offred to take away the sins of many Heb. 9. last he bare the sinnes of many Esay 53. last he was plagued for the transgression of his people ver 8. 3. He cannot deny that sometimes these notes of universality all every man world and the like are ofttimes used in a more restrained sense 1. The word all is sometimes taken for a part onely or some of all sorts so it is sayd that Christ healed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all or every kinde of disease Mat. 9.35 that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all Judaea and all the region round about some of all sorts went out to John Baptist and were Baptized of him Mat. 3.5 Luke 11.42 ye tith mint and rue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 every herb Peter saw a vessell let down to the earth wherein were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all foure footed beasts that is some of all kindes Act. 10.12 All flesh shall see the salvation of God Luke 3.6 I will powre my spirit upon all flesh Joel 2.28 not upon every particular man but upon some of all sorts so Esay 40.5 And in this sense it is said that Christ gave himselfe a ransome for all 1 Tim. 2.6 namely for some of all sorts of all estates orders and degrees of men in which sense the Apostle had ver 1. bidden them make prayers and prayers for all men for Kings and Princes c. 2. So the word every is many times put for some of every sort The kingdome of God is preached and every one presseth into it Luke 16.16 God will make manifest the counsels of the heart and then every man shall have prayse of God 1 Cor. 4.5 not every particular man but every good man of what estate and condition soever Every man saith I am of Paul I am of Apollo cap. 1.12 Every man taketh his owne supper and one is hungry and another is drunken cap. 11.21 Every particular man amongst the Corinthians did not make rents and schismes in the Church neither did every man come unworthily to the Sacrament but a great many did and therefore this expression of generality is used and so when the Apostle sayth that Christ tasted death for every man it doth not necessarily follow that he dyed for every particular man but for many he gave himselfe a ransome for many Mat. 20.28 even for every of the sonnes of God for every heire of salvation of whose salvation Christ is appointed to be the head and Captaine for so it followes in the next verse It became him for whom and by whom are all things in bringing many sonnes to glory to make the captaine of their salvation perfect through sufferings Heb. 2.10 3. So the word World is often taken not for the whole world but for a part only as when it is said that when Christ came into the World the world knew him not Joh. 1.10 that the world hated him cap. 15.19 that the World hated his chosen ones ver 20. that the Whole world lyeth in wickednesse 1 Joh. 5.19 This cannot be understood of the whole world as including every particular man but onely of the worst part of the Whole wicked world And as the word World is ofttimes taken for the worst so sometimes for the better part of the world as when it is said that God was in Christ reconciling the World to himselfe and not imputing their sinnes 2 Cor. 5.19 There is a great part of the world who were never reconciled but alwayes have and alwayes shall remayne in a state of enmity with God and Christ even all those to whom Christ shall say at the last day I never knew you Mat. 7.25 all those who before Christs comming had been strangers from the covenant and had lived without God in the World Eph. 2.12 A great part of the world shall have their sinnes imputed to them for Christ shall set them on his left hand and say unto them go yee cursed into hell fire Mat. 25. so also is the world taken when Christ sayth he came into the World not to condemne the World but that the World might be saved by him Joh. 3.17 This cannot be understood of the whole world for Christ shall condemne a great part of the world even all those that he shall set on his left hand and what ever he shall do at last he intended at first to do Neither shall all the world be saved by him neither did he intend to save all for then he should misse of his intention neither in reason can we thinke that he came to save such as were already damned therefore by world must needs be understood the better part namely so many as are saved So Christ is sayd to be the bread of God that came down from heaven and giveth life to the world Joh. 6.33 There is a world to whom Christ actually giveth life but he doth not this to the whole world but onely to the believing world for he that believeth not shall not see life Joh. 3. last he is condemned already Yea that place God so loved the world Joh. 3.16 which Arminians thinke serves so much for their turne cannot be understood of all men in the world for though the world be there taken communiter for mankinde for men living in the world yea for all sorts all estat●s orders and degrees of men yet it cannot be taken universaliter for every particular man living in the world for the love here spoken of is a speciall peculiar love God so loved In this God setteth out his love towards us that Christ dyed for us Rom. 5.8 yea this is the greatest love greater love then this hath no man Joh. 15.13 Now the same persons cannot be the objects of the greatest love and greatest hatred for then there should be no difference betwixt the elect and reprobate by all which it appeares that there is no necessity those generall expressions used in Scripture touching Christs death should be taken in a generall sense 4. It appeares plainely by many other places of Scripture that these expressions of Christ dying for all men loving the

presupposeth a decree of permitting sin for as sinne cannot be unlesse God permits it to be so he cannot foresee it shall be unlesse he had decreed this permission this decree to permit sin presupposeth an end for which God permits it which can be no other then the glorifying of his justice in the just condemnation of some men and that being the end must needs in order of nature go before the means that tend to it therefore the decree of reprobation must needs go before the decree of permitting sin to be without which there can be no foresight of it besides what is first in Gods intention if we speak of the last ends must be last in execution therefore if the decree of permiting sin shall go before Gods decree of glorifying himself in the just condemnation of some men for sin then this should be last in execution and so God should first bring condemnation upon men for sin and afterwards permit them to sin which is so absurd as all will readily reject it 2. The doctrine which makes the foresight of the fall yea of all actuall sins to go before the decree of reprobation will not clear God from all appearance of cruelty and hard dealing with man no more then the doctrine of the absolute decree for if God did certainely foresee that having created man and placed him in such or such a condition that being left to himself without a new supply of effectuall grace he would certainly fall and commit such sins as would certainly bring upon him eternall damnation and destruction if he did foresee that his Sonne being offered to him he would certainly reject and refuse him and persist in doing so to the end why did he not prevent this why did he not keep men from falling at all or not raise them up when they were fallen by bestowing such effectuall grace upon them whereby they should have layd hold of Christ and persevered in doing this to the end since God could have done this yea have done it without any wrong to his justice as well for all as for some if he bears such love to all as he earnestly heartily and inwardly desires they should be saved why doth he not procure their salvation since he is able to do it if he be so tender hearted that he cannot endure their destruction why doth he not keep them from it since he is able to do it Object They will not accept of salvation when he offers it but wilfully run to destruction Answ But he can change this rebellious will he can take away the heart of stone and put into them hearts of flesh he can make them willing to accept of salvation he can work all this convenienti modo and that in all as well as in some if therefore he doth alike desire the salvation of all why doth he not deal with all alike and bestow the like effectuall grace upon all Here the Arminians can give no sufficient answer to maintain the equality of Gods love to all unlesse that they say he gives like grace to all but one mans will makes this effectuall which anothers doth not Object But doth not God himself say I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked Ezekiel 33.11 that he would have none to perish 2 Peter 3.9 Answ The will of God in Scripture is taken two wayes either properly or improperly either for the will of his decree or the will of his command that there is a reall difference betwixt these appears by these reasons 1. The will of his command may be resisted the will of ●●●●decree cannot be resisted Rom. 9. 2. The will of his command is mutable as were all the commands about the ceremoniall law the will of his decree is immutable 3. His commands are given forth in time whereas his decrees are from all eternity 4. His commands may be contrary one to the other as he gave command to Abraham first to kill then not to kill his son whereas his decrees are never contrary one to another 5. The will of his command is an effect that ariseth from him it is somthing that he puts forth out of himselfe but the will of his decree is the same with himself for take will properly and then velle agere and esse are all one in God To apply this to the present purpose the will of God in these and the like places is not to be understood of the will of his decree but of the will of his command he may be said not to will desire or delight in the death of a sinner because he commands and injoyns every man to do that which would keep him from death and certainly bring him to life were it observed oftimes though not alwayes as in the example of Abrahams killing his son the will of his command is an effect of his internall will and therefore by a metonimy is called by the same name 2. Somtimes will and affections are attributed to God in Scripture per modum actionis in regard of his actions as he is said to repent not because he changeth his mind but because he changeth his actions as a repenting man is wont to do so he is said to will or desire such or such a thing because he so carries himself in his actions as one that desires a thing should be his actions are such as are fit to bring forth such an effect Thus likewise he may be sayd not to will the death of a sinner or the death of him that dies because his carriage towards them and all his actions and dealings with them are such as are fit to preserve them from death and destruction and to bring them to life and safety his goodnes forbearance and long suffering lead to repentance his judgments are upon the Earth that the Inhabitants of the World might learn Righteousnes much more do his Word and Ordinances immediatly tend to life That in this and the like places the will of God is not to be taken properly for the will of his decree or good pleasure appears because this is alway fulfilled what he wills he works Our God is in heaven and doth whatsoever he will Psalm 115.3 whatsoever pleased the Lord that did hee in heaven and in earth Psalm 135.6 where will properly taken and power concurre there effect must needs follow and so no sinner should die When the Scripture mentions two things of God which cannot stand together as that he doth repent and that he cannot repent 1. Sam. 15.11.29 that he wills not the death of a sinner Ezek. 33.11 and that the Lord hardens whom he will Rom. 9.18 we are to look which of these agrees with the nature of God and this is to be taken properly the other figuratively now it well agrees with the nature of God to effect his own end and purpose when therefore it is said that he doth not will or desire the death of him that dies this is not to be taken

those never receive it to whom it is given yea the thing it selfe which is given not have being at all in rerum natura 12. By this doctrine that speciall grace of conversion should be for litle purpose or rather be of no use at all for if God stands ready by his speciall grace to concurre with man in the act of believing and repenting onely when he sees man moving and applying his owne will to the doing of these things what needs there any such speciall grace at all for to will to repent and beleeve is all one with repenting and beleeving they teach that if man doth not resift God calling him to beleeve that God is ready to concurre with him in the act of beleeving now not to resist this call is to obey it to obey God calling to beleeve what is it but to beleeve If man doth believe what needs there any help of speciall grace to cause him to do that which he doth already or how can God be said to work that which hath been wrought already or give being to that which hath being already nothing can be a condition of it self and it is absurd to say that God is ready to work faith in us and cause us to believe if wee believe already before he puts forth this Worke of his Objections against the former Arguments Object 1 AGainst the first argument it is objected that God may be said to worke both the will and the deed and to cause men to walk in his statutes c. because he concurs with mans will in the act of obeying in the act of believing and the like Answ But according to their doctrine this is only a generall concourse or influence whereby he assists mans will in these as in all other actions that as if a man will speak walk or the like God is ready to concurre with him in these things so if he will believe hee is ready to concur with him in the act of believing and by this meanes God concurs onely ut author naturae non ut author gratiae as a supporter of nature not an infuser of grace whereas in all spirituall actions that man performs God doth act upon him not only by a naturall but a supernaturall power whereby he moves his will to do the same thing which he requires as also to do it in the same manner and to the same end which he requires for which a double grace is needfull one habituall whereby nature is regenerated and enabled for supernaturall acts the other actuall whereby the will being regenerate is excited and put on to these acts as to beleeve obey and the like 2. If God only assists men in the act of believing when he sees that they will believe how can he be said to work the will and the deed if when he sees that man wills to walke in his statures and keepe his Commands he only stands ready to concur with him in this worke how can be he said to cause him to walke in his statutes How can Faith be said not to be of our selves but to be the gift of God 3. This new motion of the will whereby it moves and stirres it self to repent and believe being a new entity and being whence can it proceed but from him in whom wee live move and have our being all gracious habits must have a first efficient that gives being to them which can bee no other then him that is the authour of grace Object 2 Against the third argument it is objected that man is not wholly dead in sinne nor properly dead but only by way of resemblance and similitude for there are many differences betwixt one that is corporally and spiritually dead and this is somtimes resembled to sicknes or sleep where life remains as well as to death Answ Though mans soule bee not properly dead yet it is truly dead and wholly dead in sin being as wholly void of spirituall life as the body is of naturall when the soule is separated from it and though there be some differences betwixt the naturall and spirituall death as in all similitudes there is some dissimilitude yet they agree in the maine which is this that as he who is naturally dead cannot prepare himself to live or put life into himself no nor hinder his owne reviving and quickning when God will worke it no more can he that is spiritually dead do this and though spirituall death sometimes be compared to other things as sickness sleep c. yet this hinders not but the Soule may be truly and wholly dead because in divers respects it may be said to be sick and asleep and also dead sick because weak infirme and void of spirituall strength asleep because void of sense and disabled for motion and action as a sleepy man is for a time dead because disabled not onely for the act but deprived of the faculty of spirituall action and motion and that not for a time but alway unlesse God restore it by infusing spirituall life Object But a dead man cannot resist the infusion of life whereas a dead sinner resists the work of grace Answ Though a sinner wants the life of grace yet the sin which is in him wants not life that old man and body of sinne which wholly possesseth him and prevails in him is lively quick and active causing a man to yeeld the members of his body as instruments of unrighteousnes to commit iniquity Rom. 6.13 alway lusting against the Spirit Gal. 5.17 this is no argument to prove that a man is not wholly void of the life of grace because he is able to performe actions belonging to the life of sinne but rather the contrary for where sinne most prevails there grace hath least power sinne wholly prevailes in an unregenerate man for he is a servant of sinne Rom. 6.17 Object 3 Against the Seventh argument it is objected that though all have the like outward means and like inward abilities yet it is not man but God that makes the difference because he dispenseth the means to some in such a congruous manner and time when they are so fitly disposed as he knows they will receive grace offered which he doth not to others Answ Though grace be offered in the most congruous manner and time that may be yet still he that receives may reject it if he will and he that rejects may receive if he will and so it is mans will that makes the difference and since this congruous disposition whereby a man is more fit and ready at one time for receiving of grace and mercy then at another doth or may arise from naturall causes hence it will follow that the efficacy of grace may be resolved into nature 2. What congruity is there betwixt contraries what agreement is there betwixt righteousnesse and unrighteousnesse light and darknesse 2 Cor. 6.16 if whatever is borne of the flesh be flesh and the flesh alway lusteth against the Spirit they being contraries Gal. 5.17

not onely in mans free-will but in the rocke it selfe not onely in the sheepe but in the sheepheard for if he be both carefull and able to keep them what should hinder that they are not kept If it be said that their own wils hinder because they either neglect or reject their owne conservation this cannot be for when Christ made them his sheep of unwilling he made them willing to come to him to heare his voice and follow him when he takes them into his custody he causeth them to be both willing and carefull to remaine and abide with him If at any time they grow carelesse and backward they become crosse and perverse he causeth them to see this and repent of it otherwise how were he a faithfull sheepheard if he did not preserve those that are committed to his custody from all such dangers and defections as will bring destruction when he is able to doe it and when he hath promised that they shall never perish John 10.2 how was Christ a perfect Saviour as before was shewed if he should preserve and deliver his sheep for whom he hath laid down his life and whom he hath taken into his custody from some dangers and some enemies only and not from all if he should deliver them from externall enemies only and not from internall from fathan and this evill World but not from the power of that corruption that cleaves to their natures from the old man and body of sinne from that law of their members which rebels against the law of their mind and leads them captive to sinne and death from that flesh which alalway lusts against the Spirit as being alway contrary to it especially since this of all other enemies is the most dangerous as being within us and therefore neerest to us as being that without which all outward enemies could do us no harme outward enticings not being able to prevaile if we were not drawne away and enticed by our own concupiscence How can Christ bee said to save us out of the hands of our enemies and all that hate us if hee doth still leave us in the hand of our nearest and worst enemy saving us onely from the power of Satan and wicked men but leaving us to the power of sinne and corruption and to the sway of our owne evill hearts which are desperately wicked and deceitfull above all things Jer. 17.9 and which will certainly lead us to destruction if we be left to the evill bent and inclination of them To conclude how can the faithfull be said to have strong consolations Heb. 6.9 either from the promises of God or merits and mediation of Christ if the utmost extent of these be to give them assurance that they shall bee kept free onely from force and violence so as they shall never be drawne from Christ against their wills and made to fall away whether they will or no but otherwise if at any time their wills faile then shall Christs helpe be ready to faile and hee will no longer undertake the keeping of them then he sees them carefull to keep themselves Is it not Christs keeping that makes them watchfull and careful to keep themselves Is it not his care and good will that makes them both willing and able to resist temptation and to do all things needfull for their owne safety and preservation certainly if it were not they could take small comfort in all the promises that are made to them Object 3 Against the 8. argument it is objected that the word is in it selfe immortall seed though those perish who have received it The Word of God hath not this denomination of seed as it is considered in it selfe but as it hath relation to those that are borne of it and called immortall or incorruptible because it is the principle of an incorruptible and never dying life which denomination it could not have if the life that ariseth from it were subject to decay as that life is which ariseth from corruptible seed Object 2 Against that place 1 Iohn 3.9 it is objected that the regenerate man cannot commit a sinne unto death so long as the seed remaines in him but through his owne fauit through his negligence or wilfulnesse that seed may by little and little fall from him and then he may wholly fall Answ But this contradicts the Apostle and makes his argument of no force for he having affirmed that who ever is borne of God sinneth not that is doth not wholly fall under the power of sinne brings this as an argument to prove it because the seed the divine principle of regeneration remains in him which were of no strength if this seed might be lost and not remain and when the Apostle saith it doth remain how dare any say the contrary Other Objections answered Object 4 A righteous man may fall from his righteousnesse commit iniquity and dy in his sinne Ezek. 18.24 Answ This is not to be understood of true righteousnesse such as ariseth from inward sanctification of soule and spirit but for such outward actions of righteousnesse as may be performed by one whose heart is not sound and upright therefore where the Prophet speaks of the same thing Ezek. 33.13 he expresseth what kind of righteousnes here he means saying that if the righteous man trust to his owne righteousnesse and commit iniquity he shall die for the same hee that is truly righteous doth not trust to his own righteousnesse Object But if this be but seeming and feigned righteousnesse better then to forsake it then continue in it Answ The outward actions of righteousnesse may be good though somtimes they proceed not from a right heart a man may do that which is lawfull and right and thence be called a just man Ezek. 18.5 though these things proceed not from right principles within being ready to rest in the outward actions when the inward affections are wanting neither doth every one feign and dissemble who performs outward actions of obedience though not moved to do these by the strength of Gods commands and looking at Gods glory as his chief end Object But this outward righteousnesse will not bring men to life Answ But the way of righteousnesse leads to life Prov. 12. last though all that walke in this way do it not with a right heart 2 Chron. 25.2 and so misse of the end whereto the way leads the outward actions of righteous men are the way to blisse though they may bee done by such as are not truly righteous 2. Some understand this death which may befall a righteous man not of eternall death but temporall death or other temporall punishments but because this death stands in opposition against the life which a righteous man attains by persevering in the wayes of righteousnesse the former answer seems best to agree with the place and to satisfie the doubt Object 5 Every branch in me that bringeth not forth fruit he taketh away Iohn 15.2 therefore there are some that