It is sinfull doctrine to say that CHRIST takes away this sense of sin For 1. this is the very true tendernesse and gracious smitings of heart under any guiltinesse As 1 Sam. 24.5 2 Sam. 24.10 Davids heart smote him after he had cut off the lap of Sauls garment and numbred the people 1 Joh. 3.20 Job 27.6 And in some it is the naturall conscience accusing and challenging after sin is committed now CHRIST came not to extirpate conscience nor the power of feeling and discerning the obligation to wrath that the conscience apprehendeth after sin is committed nor the legall evill deserving of sin nor the contrariety between it and the Law 2. Christ by his death gives repentance and mourning for sin Acts 5.31 Eze. 12.10 11. 3. Christ commends this Jer. 31.18 I have surely heard Ephraim bemoaning himself 2 King 22.19 Because thine heart was tender and thou hast weept before me I have also heard thee saith the Lord. Luk. 7.44 She hath washed my feet with tears 4. If Christ by his death should remove this hee should bring on by his death a heart passed feeling and burnt with a hot iron which is condemned Eph. 4.19 1 Tim. 4.2 5. It speaks a gracelesse rockinesse of heart to sin and not care for it Act. 18.17 18. Pro. 30.20 Far lesse would the Lord have us to dream that a Christan is annihilated and melted into God where they leave off to know will desire feel act or do any thing but God is all and all in this life and that to the eye of faith though not to the eye of reason all sense of sin is destroyed this is a destroying and overturning of all of Law Gospel of all humble walking with God and removes all necessity of fearing hoping believing praying hearing and changes us over into blocks PART II. Of the Mediatour of the Covenant CHAP. I. Q. WHat room or place hath Christ the Mediator in the Covenants A. He hath place in the Covenant of Works as a satisfier for us 2. As a doer and an obedient fulfiller thereof in all points And he is Mediator and Surety of the Covenant of Grace 2. The first Adam marres all the second ADAM who makes all things new mends all The first Adam was a publick sort of stirresman to whom was committed the standing and falling of all mankind and in reference to man the standing of Heaven Earth and Creatures in their perfection and he spoiled all put all things a-reeling The second ADAM received in his arms the whole Creation that was a-falling for in him all things 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 stand fast Col. 1.17 And he bears up all by his mighty word Heb. 1 3. He satisfied for our sins and for our breach of the Covenant of Works 2. He is a full doer and fulfiller of the Covenant of Works most perfectly by doing 1 Joh. 3.7 He who does righteousnesse is righteous As he who suffers for the broken Law fulfills the Law Rom. 6.7 He that is dead 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is freed justified from sin in the obligation of it to punishment So Paul vers 8. If wee be dead with Christ we beleeve that we shall live with him This dying is to beleeve that he died for us at least it excludes not that And if we keep the Law we are not oblidged to suffer for the Law does not oblidge man in absolute sense both to perfect doing and to perfect suffering copulatively but to one of them But if we be legally dead with Christ as his death so excellent doth exhaust sins punishment and is a perfect satisfaction therefore we are freed or justified from sin not to suffer or satisfie by suffering for it as Rom. 8.3 For what the Law could not do so that it was weak by accident not of it self through the flesh God sending his own Son in the likenesse of sinfull flesh and for sin condemned sin in the flesh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the righteousnesse of the Law the passive righteousnesse in suffering for the breach of the Law might be fulfilled in us 2 Cor. 5.2 And Isai. 53.5 But he was wounded for our transgressions c. 6. The Lord laid upon him the iniquity of us all But though some suffer as the reprobate do and suffer in this life the beginning of satisfactory judgement yet are they not loosed from active obedience to the Law as the Law though they cannot having once sinned be under the Law as a Covenant of Justification and life nor is any flesh under that Covenant now Q. What place hath Christs righteousnesse here Ans. Pareus with some others distinguish between the Righteousnesse of Christs person which contains his essentiall Righteousnesse as God the habituall and actuall conformity of the Man Christ and the perfect holinesse of the Man Christ. Such a High Priest became us as is holy harmlesse c. Heb. 7.26 And The righteousnesse of his merit in the satisfaction of his suffering the satisfaction is the formall cause of our Justification which is counted ours this latter righteousnesse is acquired the former is essentiall Now the active obediēce of Christ falls under a twofold consideration 1. As the Man Christs perfect conformity to the Law of God so as man he was oblidged to do and suffer all that he did and suffered even to lay down his life for man But had he been only man his righteousnesse had neither been by condignity meritorious no◠yet satisfactory for us But 2. The whole course of Christs obedience from his birth to the grave by doing and suffering is to be considered as the doing and suffering of so excellent a person his being born his praying preaching dying coming from a Person God-Man Now the Law required not praying preaching of God-man the blood of God or the dying of him who was God-Man And so all these being both so excellent and then so undue have respect of satisfaction to God 2. The active obedience of Christ all that Christ did and suffered were performed by him in his state of humiliation In which he was poor 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Cor. 8.9 for us so also by the same ground a weeping man hungry thirsty weary for us made lower then the Angels by the suffering of death Heb. 2.9 Humbled by partaking of flesh and blood because of the children Heb. 2.14 Emptied himself for us Ph. 2. This was as Pareus well saith perpetua quaedam passio paena peccatorum nostrorum fuit tota vita Christi All these have a respect of punishment and suffering For since Christ was both a viator and a comprehensor and such a holy sinlesse person he ought to have had the actuall possession of the Crown of Glory from the womb and so should have been free of weeping hunger thirst wearinesse groaning sighing sadnesse persecution reproaches c. all which adhered to all his active holinesse and therefore in that his actions were
all threatnings and promises we are not to believe that though we sin we shall actually quoad eventum die and though we obey and beleeve wee are not to beleeve that GOD shall fulfill his promise and that our salvation shall come to passe only we are to believe jure that we deserve to die and that we shall have eternall life jure promissionis but not actually and according to the event Answ. Something is to be said of the threatnings then of the promises As touching the sense we are to beleeve In the threatnings conditionall as yet fourty days and Nineveh shall be destroyed and in that day thou eats thou shalt surely die in thy person and all thine the first and second death we are not to believe the event nor is it carnall security not to beleeve such an event we are only to have a godly fear and to tremble at the dreadfuâ—l deserving of such threatnings legall as alway are to be exponed and beleeved by all within the Visible Church with an Evangelick exception of repentance If therefore Adam did beleeve that he and all his should in their own persons actually suffer the first and second death and that irrecoverably he had no warrand for any such belief and the like may be said of Nineveh For when the Lord said in the day that thou eats thou shalt die the first and second death thou and all thy children personally His meaning was except I provide an Evangelick remedy and a Saviour Godly fear trembles more at the darkning of the glory of the Lord in a broken Law then at the event of inflicted wrath were it even Hells fire Obj. Adam was to beleeve no such exception Answ. True Because it was not revealed nor was he to beleeve the contrary that he should irrecoverably and eternally perish because that was not revealed But the threatning of the Law doth not deny the Evangelick remedy as it neither doth affirme it Obj. Then was Adam to believe it was true which the Serpent said ye shall not surely die quoad eventum but ye shall be as Gods living and knowing good and evill Ans. Neither doth that follow for in the meaning of the liar it was not true that they should not die either by deserving for Satan brangles the equity and righteousness of the Law and threatning or actually and in the event for both were false and neither revealed and faith is not to go beyond what is revealed of God And Sathan disputed against both the equity of the threatning as if it had been unjust in Law and against the event as a fiction and a thing that should not come to passe in the event which indeed did not come to passe but not according to the Serpents lying and false principles Obj. Was then Adam to despair and to beleeve nothing of a Saviour Ans. He was not obliged to despaire but to rely by vertue of the first Commandement of the Decalogue upon God infinitly powerfull mercifull gracious and wise to save for that was revealed and written in his heart and that is far from despairing But in the intervall between the fall and the Lords publishing the blessed Gospel and news of the seed to come he was so to trust in God for possible deliverance in generall as the Law of Nature requireth but he was to beleeve nothing of unrevealed particulars far lesse of the mystery of the Gospel which was kept secret since the world began Rom. 16.25 Obj. Then may also the damned in Hell who are not loosed from their obligation to the Law of Nature and the first Command be obliged to rely on an infinite and Almighty God for their deliverance for they are not obliged to despair nor is there an obligation to any sin Ans. There is not the like reason for though the damned be not loosed from the Law of Nature but are to rely upon God in his whole al-sufficiency yet with exception of his revealed Justice and Truth Now he hes expresly revealed that their worm never dieth and their fire never goeth out And to believe that is not to despaire Obj. What are then such Heathens to beleeve as touching that threatning who never heard of the Gospel Ans. They are under the Law of Nature and to beleeve that sin deserves wrath according to the infinitnesse of the Majesty against whom it is committed and to obey the Law of Nature and read the Book of the Creation carefully But and if the news and rumor of a Saviour come to their ears their sin cannot but be Evangelick in not pursuing the reality and truth of such a soveraign remedy Yet it is not to be thought that though the Gospel be come to all Nations Rom. 16.26 that that is to be meant 1. Of every Generation of all Nations Or 2. of the individuall persons either young or come to age of every Nation under Heaven experience and Scripture speaketh against both Obj. But is not the Covenant of Grace contrary to the Law and Covenant of Works Answ. A diversity there is but contrary wills in the holy Lord cannot be asserted Yea the Gospel may be proven out of the Law and from the first Commandement of the Decalogue if any act of the Lords free will and infinite wisedome shall be added to prove the Assumption So If the first Command teach that God is infinitely wise mercifull gracious just and able to save then if so it please him he shall save But the first Command teacheth the former And the Gospel revealing the unsearchable riches of Christ Eph. 3.8 expresly saith so much Ergo. As to the promises they contain not only the jus equity and goodnesse of the thing promised but also that the Lord shall actually perform yea and intends to perform what he hath promised upon condition that we perform the required condition And in this the promises differ not a little from these threatnings that are only threatnings of what God may do in Law but not from these threatnings which are both threatnings and also Propheticall predictions of what shall come to passe therefore must we here difference betwixt threatnings and such and such threatnings The promises are considered as they are Preached and anunciated to all within the Visible Church and as they are made in the intention of God with the Elect and Sons of the promise The same way the threatnings admit of a two-fold consideration The promises to the Elect as intended of God reveal that both the Lord minds to give the blessing promised and the condition that is grace to perform the condition and so they are promises Evangelick both in the matter and in the intention of the Lord But as proponed to the reprobate who are alwayes from their birth to their death under a Covenant of Works really as touching the LORDS holy Decree they are materially Evangelick promises but formally and in the Lords intention legall as every dispensation to
the coals of that hellish furnace and kindle a fire before night 3. They being under the Law of Nature are to rely on infinite mercy able to save Their witty darknesse of unbeleef saith they beleeve but they hate mercy in the generall toward others as to themselves 2. For a doubting child of God because the light of evidence which to them in that case is dimme comes nearer to the naturall light of reason then to spirituall light therefore faith must be set on work to act as faith and faith acts most strongly when reason is weakest Naturall causes work more strongly under opposition the fire burns most vehemently in winter frost and the internall heat of the body is most mighty for concoction when the coldness of the air is most piercing without faith sees God most piercingly at midnight in Job when rottennesse and deadness speaks the contrair Job 19. I know surely so the word Exod. 8.1 Psal. 31.8 that my Redeemer lives Isa. 50.10 He that walks in darknesse and hath no light of evidence let him trust on the Name of the Lord and let him stay himself upon his God Rom. 4.19 20. 2. There is a peece of unseen wilfulnesse in unbeleef and two refusalls in it as we see in Thomas Joh. 20.25 as there is a masse of sanctified will required in sincere faith Rom. 10.9 10. Mark 9.24 and so resistance must be made to that blind impulsion of will in unbeleef by which we please our selves in doubling our doubting 3. Should the commanding of killing the Son Gen. 22.2 seem to contradict the whole Gospel of the promised Seed Gen. 15.4 yet knowing both to come from God Abraham did well to leave the supposed contradiction to be solved by God and beleeve both as we are to beleeve food in no food and in famine Q. Where was there a word that God was Adams God Ans. Not directly For 1. that Covenant was like Letters of the King raised to such a day and the date being expired the Letters cease to be in force 2. Adam was to winne and purchase as it were God to be his God by consumate obedience God never said that he would be Adams God by giving him influences to obey and to obey to the end all influences granted to Adam to will and to do were granted to him 1. By God Creator not by the grace of a Redeemer as in the Covenant of Grace to walk Ezek. 36.27 to love Deut. 30.6 to persevere Jer. 32.39 40. 2. These influences were free gifts but not promised 3. They seem to be ordinis naturalis naturall though they did bow and previously inclince the will but not so in the New Testament for the whole Covenant is called by the promise of the giving of a new heart Heb. 8.10 Isa. 54.9.13 Jer. 31.31 32 33. Ezek. 11.19 20. Hos. 2.18 19. And therefore better it is that God be Lord of my heart and it be his then that I be lord of it and my heart be mine own heart the lesse of our heart be upon our heart the more upon God the better Ah! we cannot skill to guide a heart 3. The threatning of death to Adam if he should sin Gen. 2.17 may infer a Covenant of life and that God should be Adams God if he should obey CHAP. IX What life is promised in the Covenant of Works 2. Whether all we especially the Reprobate by the fall lost all right to the creatures 3. How the Lord is our God Q. WHat is meaned by life promised in the Covenant of Works A. 1. Not a life in Christ and the fruit of the merit of blood as our life is in the New Covenant Joh. 10.11 Joh. 3.16 For Adam was not Mediator of reconciliation here he was a sort of publick Law-head in whom he was to stand or fall if any please to call him so a Mediator 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but it is a Law-life happily a communion in glory 2. But the life he lived and the creatures for his service seems not to belong to this life for the creatures were given to Adam he not working for them Yet I should not oppose if any say that earthly blessings were given to Adam as a reward of an actuall obedience as they are given to such as keep the Law Deut. 28. But sure our gain in Christ of such a life bought by so noble a Ransome as the Blood of God-man is not little It s rawnesse and greennesse of wit to value it so low as we do Children see not what a hireing and taking apple Heaven is Q. Whether or no did Adam and all the Reprobats in his loyns by sin losse right to the creatures A. There is a three-fold right 1. Naturall 2. Providentiall 3. Spirituall A naturall right may be conceived two wayes 1. Absolutely so creature and man not created can have no jus or claime to being or life the Creators free gift is our best Charter to life and being 2. This right may be conceived conditionally as if God create the Sun a power to give light is congruous and debita naturae Solis suteable to the nature of the Sun nor can the creature plead for this as debt but if the Lord give being to injoy this being can not be sin because there is no law and command to nothing to receive or not to receive being and life from the Creator And where there is no Law there is no transgression And therefore to have being and life cannot be in it self a sin 2. Providentiall right is but a continuating of life and being untill the same power that gave it shall remove it by way of punishment For God as Creator of his Soveraignty gives being and life and the comfortable use of the creatures but as a Judge ordinarily for sin he removes it though he I deny not out of his Soveraignty may and possibly doth annihilate the meat that the Angels in assumed bodies and which the Man Christ after the Resurrection did eat 3. The spirituall right is that new supernaturall Title which the Elect beleevers have in order to a supernaturall end and all these being made theirs to promove their salvation 1 Cor. 3.21 All things are yours Rev. 21.7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things by Covenant-right so he adds And I will be his God and he shall be my Son Psal. 37 10. A drink of cold water by this Charter is better then a Kings Crown and hath refreshed some more then all the choise wine the earth yeelds The love of the Giver is better then wine Cant. 1.2 and here the Charter is by many thousands more precious then the Land For nature common to all is over-gilded with free-Grace And the naturall life and being and the materiall heavens we shall injoy are blessed in another manner to the glorified then these they now injoy 1 Cor. 15.40 41 42 43 c. 2 Pet.
that Christ is the Son of God Luke 4.34 and so doeth the carnall Jew teach that it is not lawfull to steal to commit adultery Rom. 2.21 22. But in the Old and New Testament Devils never accuse themselves of sin but tempt to it and challenge the Law and God Gen. 3.4 5. of unjustice never themselves Divels are most properly under the Covenant of Works and by no command is the Gospel Preached to them and next to them are such as are found in the letter of the Gospel but never convinced of sin Such are most under the Law as have least Law-work and Law-condemnation upon their Spirits these that are under the Law most as touching their state are most under the letter least under the Spirit as touching any penall awaking To be under Law-bondage is a more punishment to Divels and men under a Law state for legall terrors are upon Divels Math. 8.29 Jam. 2.19 and Cain Gen. 4.14 punishment as such neither maketh nor denominateth any gracious it is but accidentall to prepare any for Christ many tormented with the Law have believed such a case to be the pain of the second birth when it was but a meer Law-feaver and have returned to their vomit and become more loose and profane 1. Because the Law as the Law can convert none 2. Wrestling with Law-bondage without any Gospel-Grace is but a contradicting of God and his justice and God recompenceth opposing and blaspheming of him in hell with more sinfull loosenesse 3. Law-light under legall terrors shines more clearly and the guiltinesse in not making use of rods of that nature is so much the more grievous Ye that have been scadded and burnt in this furnace and are come back from hell are taught by sense to believe there is a hell and though hell torment can convert no man yet it renders men more unexcusable Humbling wakning and sanctifying Law-bondage is more then a work of the Law when it brings forth confessing praying believing humble submitting to God in Job David Hâ—zekiah Heman and what a Physician is Christ who can heal us with burning and coals of hell 3. A man under a Law-work may give a legall and dead assent to both the truth and goodnesse of the promises liberally conceived as temporaries doe and Simon Magus wonders but Saul Acts 9. the Jaylor trembles Acts 16. but that is in regard of the conviction not of the mind only but of the conviction of affection and the yeelding to what shall I do But Foelix trimbleth but only in regard of literall conviction on the mind but neither he nor Magus comes to what shall I doe they differ as the burning light of a fire which both casts light and with it shiâ—ing heat also and the light that precious stones cast in the night which is both little and hath no heat Fyrie and piercing convictions are good there is a dead conviction of the letter that doth not profite 4. There is a strong Law-conviction that vengeance followeth the scaddings of Sodomie and the killing of parents because naturall instinct kindles and fires the soul with Law-apprehensions when the minde hath engraven sharpnesse to discerne undenyable principles but the conscience is more dull in apprehending that spirituall vengeance followeth such spirituall sins as unbelief because untill there be some supernaturall revelation we are dead to the Gospel truths and Gospel sins but when a common Grace hightens the soul to a supernaturall assent that Christ is a Teacher sent of God Joh. 7.28 Joh. 3.2 the conviction is more strong But because it is more supernaturall and in stead of kindly affection of love which it wants it is mixed with hatred and anger and so degeners into fierie indignation against the Holy Ghost as Joh. 15.24 compared with Math. 12.15 26.31 cleareth 5. Conviction which is no more but conviction is no godly principle nor makes any heart change yea it goes dangerously on to wonder and despise except it send down coals of fire to the affections 6. He who is under the Covenant of Grace findes a threefold sweetnesse in obedience 1. An inbred sweetnesse in the command 2. In the strength by which he acts 3. An inbred sweetnesse in a communion with God No man is any other way under the Law then under a yoak what is only written seems the oldnesse of the letter Rom. 7. and is dead of it self and layes on a burden but gives no back to bear He that is under Grace findes sweetnesse of delight in a positive Law though the thing commanded be as hard to flesh and blood as to be crucified Joh. 10.18 yet it obtains a sweetnesse of holinesse from Gods will Psal. 40.8 I delight to do thy will O God even to be made a curse and crucified Thy Law is within my heart and he would but fulfill all righteousnesse even that which seems to be the outside of the Gospel to be sprinkled with water Math. 3.15 and this Christ would doe as under the Covenant of Grace 2. The stirrings and breathings of the Spirit makes the work sweet hearing brings burning of heart Luke 24.32 willing gladnesse Acts 2.41 and some sweetnesse of stirred bowells comes from the Lords putting in his hand through the Key-hole of the door of the heart Cant. 5.4 where as to an naturall man under the Law to lift up a Prayer is to carie a milstone on his back every syllabe of a word is a stone weight which he cannot bear 3. Were there no more in praying but a communion with God how sweet is it when Christ prayeth the fashion of his countenance is changed Luke 9.29 There is a heaven in the bosome of Prayer though there were never a granting of the sute sure there is a sin in making heaven a hire and in making duty a relative thing a horse for a journey a ship for a voyage to fetch home gold where as there is heaven in praising God before the Throne such as is both work and wages and so in spirituall duties here 7. Suppose there were no letter of a command because there is suteablenesse between the Law ingraven in the heart and the spirituall matter commanded a childe of Grace under Grace sets about duties so that in a maner there is no need to say to David Get thee to Jerusalem and to the house of God for he sayeth Psal. 122.1 I was glad when they said let us go to the house of the Lord. As there needs no command that the Father love the child nor is there need to exhort the Sea to ebbe and flow or the Sun to shine nor are many arguments usefull to presse the mother to give suck to the child nature stands for a Law here the strength of the ingraven Law in the heart overpowreth the letter So the new nature the indwelling anointing as a new instinct putteth the child of Grace to act But here we are to bewar that we
24. 2 Thes. 1.7 8. But it seems against all Scripture that Christ should die for these for whose sins he dies not And so that 1. Christ should half and part the sins of the Reprobate and the Scripture I judge shall not admit that Christ bare in his own body on the tree some sins of the Reprobate to wit all their sins against the Law absolutely or conditionally and he that bears not either absolutely or conditionally their other sins against the Gospel to wit their finall unbeleef and rebellion for Christ was wounded and bruised for the transgressions and iniquities of these for whom he died He must then have been wounded for some of their transgressions and not wounded for other of their transgressions And so the sins of the Reprobates are divided between Christs satisfaction upon the Crosse and their own satisfaction in Hell But he suffered one may say conditionally only for the Reprobates sins against the Law upon the Crosse if they beleeve not otherwise Ans. The same reall satisfaction conditionally that he performed on the Crosse for the Elect the same say the Authors he performed for the Reprobate conditionally if either beleeve but because the one beleeves it is accepted for payment for them and the other beleeves not it is not accepted for them 2. As there is a satisfaction performed for some sins not for all not for finall unbeleef that sin then must be in the same case with the sin of the fallen Angels there is no sacrifice for it nor is Christs death applicable by divine ordination to purge men from finall unbeleef more then to purge Devils from any sins they commit 3. The same incorruptible price of the blood of the Lamb that is given to ransome all from wrath Matth. 20.28 1 Tim. 2.6 conditionally is given to buy all for whom Christ died from their vain conversation also 1 Pet. 1.18 that is to merite faith to them conditionally Shew us the condition of the one more then the other If a condition cannot be shown Christ must have payed the price of blood upon the Crosse for some upon intention for others upon another unlike intention 4. If Christ died for all not because they did will and beleeve but that they might will and beleeve and if Jesus suffered without the Camp that he might sanctifie the people by his own blood Heb. 13.12 Heb. 10.10 That he might wash them from their sins and make them Kings and Priests to God Rev. 1.5 6. That they might offer up themselves holy living sacrifices to him Rom 12.1 upon a great designe of love to cleanse them with the washing of water by the Word and present them a glorious Church without spot or wrinkle Eph. 5.26 27. If he gave himself for them that they should live to righteousnesse being dead to sins 1 Pet. 2.24 That they might be delivered from the present evill world Gal. 1.4 If Christ gave himself for these for whom he dyed that he might redeem them from all iniquity and might purifie them to himself a peculiar people zealous of good works Tit. 2.14 Then did he die to redeem all men from iniquity even from finall unbelief the great iniquitie and from the vain conversation of finall unbelief and that they might be dead to sins especially the sin of finall unbelief Except it be said that Christ gave a price to buy faith to all Reprobate and Elect and to redeem them from finall unbelief if all would be willing But to commit to their free-will the efficacie of Redemption which Prosper saith maketh the will of God valide and effectuall and unvalide and weak according as the will of man which Davenantius Bishop of Salisburie if that opus posthumum have been written by him in his riper years and revised by himself justly censures as the boyl of Pelagian Doctrine which Faustus Rhegiensis did covertly teach The Lord saith he redeems such as are willing being a rewarder of their good or evill wils Now hardly can these eschew this Pelagianisme who teach that the death of Christ is an universall salve applicable by the decree of God to save all and every one of mankinde Christian and Pagan so they actually believe For it cannot be said that Christ hath died to make all mankinde saveable upon condition of actuall faith to receive Christ preached for so Infants to whom Christ preached is in no tollerable sense applicable that way by any ordination of God if they actually believe shal be no parts of the world they must be excluded from Baptism And it cannot be said that this argument shal militate against us for we do not defend such a conditionall applicabilitie of Christ upon condition of faith actual in preached Christ even to infants in the Visible Church yet we teach they are in Covenant with God and so God hath his decree of election to Glory and Redemption in Christ among infants as among aged professours 2. There is a providentiall and to many thousands of Pagans who never heard nor could hear of Christ an invincible impediment and so Christ is not applicable by Gods decree to them upon condition of actuall beleeving Rom. 10.14 How shall they beleeve in him of whom they have not heard It seems to me physically impossible that there is such a thing as the Indians worship Satan under such a name and in such rites if I never heard of the Indians or of their God or their worship So neither can they worship Christ in a Gospel-way who never heard of him It s impossible to beleeve a non ens Christ offered in the Gospel is very nothing and so not applicable to thousands by any decree of God 3. This is not written in Scripture God hath decreed that Christ be Preached and life be offered actually to all and every one of all and every Nation under Heaven and this opinion saith that Christ died and satisfied offended Justice for the sins of all and every one of all and every Nation under heaven except for finall unbâ—leef The Antecedent is clear by Scripture and experience God fulfills his decrees irresistibly But he never sent the Preached Gospel to as many as these Authors say he died for Nor can they themselves teach any such thing Nor is this true God hath decreed that Christ in the Preached Gospel and salvation may be offered to all and every one old and young of all and every Nation in all Generations upon condition of actuall beleeving And yet for all these without exception Christ died say they For not to say God never decreed that such may be offered to infants of Pagans for whom they say Christ died To make a thing that physically is possible the object of a decree of God we must say that God hath decreed to give the gift of tongues to all Professours and Pastours to speak to all and every Nation in their own Language and to make an offer of Christ
excludes not but includes the Lords taking in members to the invisible and mysticall body which is to be observed against Anabaptists and Antinomians The Lord speaks often of the Covenant of Grace not so much as Preached quâ foedus ennunciatum though it so also must be Preached but as fulfilled by God and acted in an effectuall powerfull way upon the hearts of the elect only and that according to the Lords decree of election and will of pleasure So speaks the Lord of the Covenant Jer. 31.31 32 33. Jer. 32.37 38 39. Ezek. 11.16 17 18 19 20. Ezek. 36.25 26 27 c. Isa. 59.20 21. in a pure Evangelick way and in these places the Lord speaks of the Covenant not so much as it contains our duty as principally it holds forth his Gospel promise what he shall effectually do according to his decree and will of pleasure over-ruling our corrupt will which Papists Arminians and Socinians utterly mistake and will have it to be spoken of the Covenant as Preached according to the Lords approving and commanding will whereas there is not one word of a command in these places and therefore they say that these places speak nothing for the efficacy and mighty power of God in converting sinners 2. The Anabaptists from these places say none are to be baptized but such as are so in Covenant and as have these promises fulfilled in them in whom the Lord hath wrought a new heart and a new spirit and that there is no externall Covenanting under the New Testament But then the whole Gentiles Isai. 55.4 5. Isai. 11.10 Isai. 60.1 2 3 c. all Nations Isai. 2.1 2. all flesh Isai. 40.5 Psal. 65.2 all the Kindreds of the earth Psal. 22.26 27. the Kingdoms of the world Rev. 11.15 should be all chosen to life taught of God such as have the Law of God ingraven in their inward parts as Jer. 31.33 Ezek. 36.26 which is most false Now there are undenyable Prophecies that the Gentiles from the rising of the Sun to the going down thereof Mal. 1.11 shall be under the New Testament the people of God by Covenant Isa. 19.18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25. Then must the generality and mixed multitude of the Gentiles be some other way in Covenant then these of whom the Prophets sâ—eak Isa. 5â— 20 21. Isa. 55.10 Jer. 31.31 Ezek. 11.19 Ezek. 36.26 3. The Antinomians do also owne no Covenant of grace but this wherein the new heart is given and the condition is both promised and given And D. Crispe saith All other Covenants of God besides this run upon a stipulation and the promises run upon conditions altogether upon both sides The New Covenant is without any conditions whatsoever upon mans part Man in tyed to no condition that he must perform that if he do not perform the Covenant is made void by him Ans. Man is under a condition of beleeving and tyed to beleeve so as the wrath of God abides upon him he shall not see life nor be justified if he beleeve not Joh. 3.18.36 Rom. 10.6 7 8 9 2. Man is tyed to no condition which he must 〈◊〉 say which he can perform without the grace of God For have he grace or have he no grace the Holy Lord O if we could plead for him and his High Soveraignty is debter to no man he is so oblidged to beleeve as he sins against the Preached Covenant and forefaults his salvation if he beleeve not and so breaks the Covenant but devils or men cannot make itâ— void he may make it of no effect to himself he being an heir of damnation but being a chosen vessel God shall work him to beleeve and he makes it not void to himself If it be said that the New Covenant is without any conditions whatsoever upon mans pure It says too much for the beleevers being under no debt no obligation of conscience to beleeve or to any duty but as the Spirit their only Law leads them And if the Spirit breath not upon them to forbear adultery paricide sodomie or to beleeve pray praise hear mourn for sin as Peter and David they sin not for sin is a transgression of the Law And when the Spirit breaths not acts not there is no Law and this is most â—ilde Where observe that â— Antinomians and Familists confound the efficient cause of our obedience which is the Spirit of Grace and the objective cause which is the holy rule of the command promise or threatning For though the Spirit be absent and not given at all to men in the state of nature yet do they sin in committing of Sodomie and in not praying for they are oblidged not to sin and commanded in the first Command to pray to a revealed God I know Adam was not oblidged before he sinned to pray to Jesus Christ Mediator as Steven Act. 7. prayed to him The Spirit by grace does help us to obey the command and the Law but the Spirit is not the Law nor rule of out obedience 2. Not only will they have the Spiritâ— to be all the beleevers Law and word and the letter of the command to lay on no obligation but the Spirit as actually breathing and giving actuall influences must be the Law For though the naturall conscience or habituall light say that the man should not commit this wickednesse nor omit this duty seeing present necessity of one starving for want of one drowning in a water crying for my help is a call of God to perform the duty And if the Spirit give inward warning that I should do the duty yet if the Spirit actually breath not and contribute not his actuall influence the man hath no warrand of any command or Law to act without his rule since the Spirit acts not at all and cannot so be guilty in the committing of the most vile abomination for where no Law is no sin is M. Crispe pag. 160. brings this Argument The Covenant is everlasting if the Covenant stand upon any conditions to be performed by man it cannot be an everlasting Covenant except man were so confirmed in righteousnesse that he should never fail in that which is his part but he daily fails so daily breaks the Covenant Ans. To the first act of beleeving which is a performing of the condition of the Covenant there is no other condition required then that Ezek. 36.26 I will put in you a heart of flesh 27. I will put my Spirit in you and cause you walk in my statutes Zech. 12.10 I will powrâ— upon the house of David the Spirit of grace and supplication and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced that is they shall beleeve in me That is a strong confirmation to wit a promise that he will work the condition in us And so is that Joh. 6.37 All that the Father gives unto me shal come unto me that is beleeve in me and him that cometh I will in no wise
suitable to mans intire nature to love God yet to love him so and so by obeying the command of not eating the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge and some other Commands is not so connaturall but God might have commanded the contrair without any thing done contrair to mans nature Yet from this it followes no more that these are two Covenants then that there be two Covenants of Grace Because faith in God and the Morall Law in an Evangelick way are therein commanded and also some duties touching the seals by a positive Law are therein contained CHAP. VII It s not written in the heart of man by nature that GOD should promise life eternall to man upon condition of obedience 2. And that the debt of Justice can not tye GOD. 3. GOD punisheth not sin by necessity of nature 4. Nor defends he his own declarative Glory by that necessity 5. Nothing can be given to GOD Al-sufficient 6. No meriting of the creature 7. We should have humble thoughts of free-Grace 8. How low thoughts of our selves 9. Promises make no strict justice between GOD and us SUre it is not repugnant to the yet innocent and intire nature of man to know that God may reward all such as seek and serve him but that he must reward obedience either in the generall or so and so is neither written in mans heart nor hath it any truth For it were nothing against justice or bounty or any attribute of God not to reward his creature which is obliged to serve him and though there be a sort of quietnesse of conscience which is the naturall result of obedience in Adam and of all men yet it cannot inferre that there is an intrinsecall connexion ex naturâ rei between our obedience and a reward to be given of God Therefore nor will it be a good inference because there is disquietnesse in the conscience after sin and that it is naturall to a sinner to apprehend a revenging power pursuing sin committed that therefore it is naturall anâ— essentiall to the Lord to pursue sin with punishment in generall For a naturall conscience may and does know that God doth freely create the world and that he might not have created it that he doth good freely to his creatures and that he is not a debtor to his creatures Will it follow by any Logick that God creates the world by any naturall obligation And because by force of a naturall conscience all know that God is good and bountâ—full to his creatures in giving and doing good to them we cannot therefore infer that actuall beneficence is so essentiall to the infinite Majesty as he should not be God if he did not extend that goodnesse to them Common sense will say no more followeth but goodnesse and bounty intrinsecall are essentiall to God and these attributes are essentiall to him and were from eternity in him and are his good and bountifull nature Though not either man Angel or any thing else had been created to which he doth actually extend his goodnesse Ergo this actuall extension of goodnesse is not essentiall to God so neither is the actuall punishing of sin essentiall to God but free though Adam apprehended God would punish his eating of the forbidden tree Yet if he apprehended that he should not be God if he did not punish it his apprehension was erroneous And this only followes that there is an intrinsecall and internall Justice in God naturall and essentiall in God but so that the out-goings of his Justice the egressions are most free and that is said by some without all reason because the apprehensions we have naturally of God that he punisheth sin Vniversales apprehensiones nequaquam sunt eorum quae Deo vel adesse vel abesse possunt pro liberrimâ voluntate Universall apprehensions therefore they are not apprehensions of such things as may be or not be in God according to his free pleasure if the apprehensions of Gods doing good to Angels to men to all his creatures freely be in all by nature and cannot be rooted out and be universall then these apprehensions cannot be of such things as are in God according to his most free will and may be in the Almighty or not be in him But the conclusion hath neither reason nor sense for there are universall apprehensions in all men and they canot be rooted out that God does good to Angels men and creatures freely Ergo by this Logick the doing of good freely to Angels men and creatures is not a thing that is in God according to his free-will and may be in the Almighty or not in him Then the so doing must be in God essentially 2. Then must God not be God if he do not good freely to them 3. Then must God not be God except he create men Angels and creatures 4. But since he is God everlasting he must from everlasting have created men Angels and the creatures and from everlasting he must punish sin Life may be considered 1. As life 2. As such an excellent life to wit a communion with God In the former consideration life is either considered as the end or secondly as a free reward In the former respect To live an intellectuall life in obeying God was to Adam so created a connaturall end as to burn is to fire and to give light to the Sunne And God may put the respect of a reward upon any obedientiall end But that Adam should have such an eminent life for the reward of his obedience as a communion with God which is farre above his obedience is the free donation of God nor is there any necessary connexion between Adams perfect obedience and so high and eminent a life nor can this Covenant as touching such a promise be written in his heart God then never loved to make any Covenant yea even that of Works without some acts and out-goings of grace and the hyre was grace how is he not to be served who loves to hyre and allure us to be happy Arminius saith the reward of keeping the Covenant of Works cannot be spirituall nor can the punishment be spirituall because you teach saith he that the obedience is naturall Ans. It followeth not for the reward is spirituall yea and supernaturall from the free promise of God It was that God should recompence our naturall obedience coming from connaturall principles with so eminent a Crowne as communion with God Creator in a life of glory And this came from no innate proportion between a naturall work and supernaturall reward Otherwise we must say first that there is such an intrinsecall connexion ex naturâ rei between Adams work and so high wages as that glorious communion was as the Lord could not but in justice so have rewarded his obedience except he would be unjust but there is nothing in the creature that can conclude limite or determine his will 〈◊〉 wisdome who is infinite 2. It had been nothing against justice if
confirmed Angels and holy as the Man Christ and brought them so to glory should he not have been God in that case and should he have lost his naturall dominion over men in that case 4. The dominion of God over men is not only in one particular of penall Laws it is in remunerative Laws also in giving predeterminating influences to obey and persevere in obedience in not leading into temptation in hyring and alluring us to serve God in terrifying men with examples of the Lords Judgements on others he spared not the Angels c. 2 Pet. 2.4 Jud. 6. and therefore to say that God falls from his naturall dominion over man and leaves off to be God except he impose penall Laws upon men is first an errour in Logick à negatione speciei ad negationem generis nulla est consequentia If God have not a dominion over man in one particular of penall Laws he falls from his whole dominion naturall in other things It is an undue inference 2. It cannot be but too darring to tye the blessed God-head and his essentiall dominion over man to only making of penall Laws it smells of Scripturelesse boldnesse with the most High and limits the Holy One that he cannot be God except he be God in our way And saith he hath no way to preserve his glory but by creating a Hell And therefore let that stand as an unproven position since it hath no probation The reason that is given is as weak as the weak conclusion Though water may bear up water yet it cannot support the earth For 1. it saith if man be created a reasonable creature under a Law he may sin intercidi potuit obedientiâ and he may be created under a Law with perfect morall dependence upon God Creator as the Elect Angels and the Man Christ and yet never sin and yet God falls not from his dominion and leaves not off to be God 2. This lookes somewhat the Arminian way that man cannot be under the subjection of properly so called Morall obedience except his will be indifferent as Adams was to stand or fall to run to Heaven or Hell which indeed saith that the most perfect obedience of Christ who was obedient to the death Phil. 2.8 and delighted to do the will of God Psal. 40.8 John 4.34 is no proper obedience that is perfect obedience is not proper obedience And that obedience of Elect Angels the samplar of our obedience Mat. 6.10 Isa. 6.2 3. Psal. 103.20 is not proper obedience 3. Whereas it is said if man sin his morall dependency cannot stand except God punish him but so not only God shall not be God nor have dominion over man except he impose a penall Law upon man but he shall not be God except he actually punish man or his surety Christ. But the same pen saith that the out-goings of justice are free that is to say it is free to God to punish sin and yet he falls from his naturall dominion over man and leaves off to be God if he punish not sin But we do deny that God falls from his naturall dominion over man though he never impose a penall Law upon him and never punish and desire that this may be proven nor is it imaginable how God by necessity of nature must punish sin And yet in the way measure and degree of punishment and in the time when he can use moderation Which is as good as to say the fire must by necessity of nature burn the Sun cast light But the fire hath free will to burn when it pleaseth and at this time and not at this time and the Sun must shine by necessity of nature but it is free to shine at ten hours of the day and not at twelve and it may shine as bright as the Sun or as dimme as the Moon Or God the Father loves himself but it is free to him to love himself to day not to morrow and to love himself so much not so much And so he may say God is so mercifull and just to day as he may be no merciful no just to morrow and God is infinitly mercifull and just and yet he is lesse mercifull and more mercifull essentially according to his good pleasure which are speaking contradictions Yea this is that which misjudging Suarez saith that the creature may do a reall injurie to God and take away from God jus Dei ad gloriam his right to glory but the truth is the creature by sin darkeneth or overcloudeth his declarative glory but can take away no essentiall glory nor any reall right or reall good from God so Elihu Job 39.6 If thou sinnest what dost thou against him If thy transgressions be multiplied what dost thou to him To take his declarative glory from God is no lose to him no more then it is lose to the Sun that ye hinder it to shine upon the wall when yet ye take no light from the Sun for it shines upon an interposed body Job 35.8 Thy wickednesse may hurt a man as thou art and thy righteousnesse may profite the Son of man It is needfull say some that God preserve his own glory safe but if sin be without infliction of punishment it is impossible that he can defend his owâ— glory Ergo of necessity he must punish sin The proposition is out of controversie for all confesse that God must preserve his own glory 〈◊〉 by necessity of nature he must do so quoniam seipsum non potest non amare Because he cannot but love himself and he hath said my glory will I not give to another To this is answered the glory internall eternall and essentiall to God the Lord must defend and love as he loves himself by necâ—ssity of nature and if any say that the egressions and out-goings of God to defend and love his own essentiall Glory and his own holy Nature so as he may use moderation in the degrees and time of these and he may love himself and his own essentiall glory more or lesse and touching the time he may delay to love himself and he may love himself and his own essentiall glory to morrow not to day As the Author sayes the out-goings of revenging justice are moderated in punishing he speaks wonders and things unworthy of God The place Isa. 42. speaks not of this glory for no idol no creature can more take away from the Almighty this essentiall glory of God nor his blessed Nature can cease to be but there is a glory declarative of pardoning mercie as well as of revenging justice It must be a carnall conception and a new dream that God by necessity of nature loves himself as cloathed with revenging justice or as just and his own glory of revenging justice but that God loves himself as mercifull and ready to forgive or his own glory of pardoning mercie freely and by no necessity of nature Which the Author must say for the place Isa. 45.
should otherwise bear this sense my glory of revenging justice only I will not give to Idol gods and creatures But the place of Isa. ch 42.8 should not conclude but they might ascribe the glory of salvation and mercifull deliverances and victories over Judah the Temple the Sanctuary to their idol gods the contrair whereof is intended by the Prophet But if the Lord by necessity of nature love his declarative glory as he loves himself then he must love glory of one attribute as well as of another and so as his Nature not freedome or soveraignty puts him to it to defend the glory of justice when man sins Yea so as he cannot be God and essentially just except he vindicat his glory of justice Yea so he must love the glory of saving and pardoning mercy as himself for the one glory is no lesse essentiall to God if it be essentiall at all then the other And by this means God by necessity of nature to preserve safe the glory of saving mercie must send his Son and by the like necessity by which he loves himself he must redeem man Now the Lord does not love himself of free grace for he every way for the infinite excellency of his Nature is love-worthy and there is no interveening of freedome or free grace or soveraignty in the Lords loving of himself and his own essentiall glory There is a declarative glory which is not essentiall to God of which the Scripture Prov. 16.4 The Lord made all things for himself that is for his glory to be declared Eph. 1.6 He hath chosen us to the praise of the glory of his grace v. 11. In Christ we have obtained an inheritance 1â— That we should be to the praise of his glory Rom. 11.36 All things are to him to his glory Isa. 43.21 This people have I formed for my self they shall shew forth my praise All these are to be understood not of the essentiall glory of God but of the declarative glory of God that shines ad extra And this glory is not essentiall to God as so declared for he was infinitly glorious from eternity and should eternally be essentially glorious though neither world nor man nor Angel had been created And the meaning of that Isai. 42.8 is mistaken the length of the Heaven toto Coelo It is not this as I love my self so by necessity of nature I will and desire that my glory due to me as God be not given to idol gods and creatures 1. What by necessitie of nature God wills that certainly and by necessitie of nature is and existeth as he loveth himself and his Son by necessitie of nature and begets his Son by necessitie of nature so also by necessitie of nature God is loved and the Son of God is loved and the Son is by necessitie of nature begotten of the Father But it is most untrue that by necessitie of nature the Glory of God is not transferred to Idol gods and creatures The Scriptures cry the contrare When ever Idolatrie is committed Isa. 40. and 41. Isa. 46. Rom. 1. Acts 17. his Glory declarative is given most sinfully to another against his approving will 2. What ever sin God forbids he forbids the existence of it by his approving will not by necessitie of nature for if God essentially and by nature willed that sin and Idolatrie should never be he would efficaciouslie hinder it But what God wills by his commanding will we see he does not efficaciouslie hinder the existence thereof For then sin and Idolatrie should not be at all nor have any existence which is contrare to Scripture and experience And surely if God love his declarative Glory essentially as himself he must essentially no lesse love to keep this glory when Angels and men do obey him and to hinder the taking away of this Glory by sin then to revenge the taking away of this glory by punishment for every sin against a positive Law to eat of the tree of knowledge or for the Jews to eat swines flesh before Christ abolished such Lawes as well as sins against the Law of nature are contrare to the Glory of God and so contrare to that essentiall love that God hath to his Glory and to the Glory of the Lord the Law-giver himself Ergo by necessitie of nature because he cannot but love himself he should preserve his legislative Glory it is as properly and essentiallie the Glory of God which he requires of us in doing his will as the Glory of suffering punishment for sin committed is his Glory therefore by necessitie of nature because God cannot but love himself he should essentially hinder sin And if God absolve the guiltie where is the Glory of his justice True it should be lost so when God suffers the Angels to fall and Adam to sin where is the Glory of his legislative Majesty it is lost so far God is oblidged to defend the Glory of his Justice say and prove that he is oblidged by necessitie of nature to defend the Glory of his Justice more then by the same necessitie he must defend his legislative Glory 3. God must defend all his Glory with the same necessitie except the Scripture make some exception of some Glory which he must preserve as dearer to him then some other Glory which is unwarrantable to say and if God must by necessitie of nature and as God because naturally he loves himself and his own Glory defend his own Glory then by necessitie of nature he must defend the Glory of all his Attributes of Holinesse Graciousnesse Greatnâ—sse Omnipotencie Eternitie Infinite knowledge c. that the Glory of not one of these be taken from him by sin And because the Lord maketh and worketh all that he doth without himself in the creature for his own Glory Prov. 16.4 Rev. 4.11 Rom. 11.36 in all that he doth he must by necessitie of nature love his own Glory quoniam seipsum non potest non amare because he loves himself Ergo by this ground the Lord doth nothing freely without himself and so the Lord makes not the rain to fall the tree to bud the sea to ebbe the wind to blow the fowls to flee the fishes to swim for the declaration of the Glory of his goodnesse or his power or his mercy his holinesse with any freedome but all these he must do for Glory to himself by necessitie of nature which Glory he loves as himself for his Glory in all he doth without he loveth by necessitie of nature as he loves himself saith the Author And therefore as he cannot preserve the Glory of his Justice but by punishing sin and that by necessitie of nature so he cannot preserve the Glory of the rest of all his Attributes which Glory also he loves as himself but by doing all without himself in like maner by necessitie of nature which utterly destroyes the libertie and freedome of God in all his works of Providence and
for I am â—rudent I removed the bounds of the people 14. And my hand hath found as a nest the riches of the people and as one gathereth â—ggs that are left so have I gathered all the earth and there was â—one that moved the wing or opened the mouth or peeped This 〈◊〉 the fool-axe boasting against him that heweth with it And anoâ—her fool said Make an agreement with me by a present and come out to me Isa. 36.16 And this mad-nothing is above God chap. 37.10 Let not thy God in whom thou trustest deceive thee The Tyrant of Egypt the great Dragon that lyeth in the midst of the river said My river is mine own and I have made it for my self Ezek. 29.3 God made the Sea and all the Rivers There be three Pronouns in the mouth of another proud Monarch Dan. 4.30 And the King spake and said Is not this great Babylon that I have built for the house of the Kingdom by the might of my power and the honour of my Majesty So soon as there falls from the great Lord of being a chip or shadow of created being especially where being is rationall and under a Law there follows and results the Lord withdrawing a proud supposed I and a vain conceit of self and a dream of God-head comes in with borrowed being And therefore created sinlesse self is to be denyed Adam denyed not himself and thought in his sick imagination he should be like God knowing good and evill Gen. 3. Christ the more excellent Adam pleased not that noble self Rom. 15.3 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He denyed himself as man as a gracious meer man to be God or more then a man And this self-deniall is in elect Angels who blush and are sinlesly ashâ—med of self and cover their faces with wings before shining Infinitnesse of Glory and proclaim him thrice Holy holy holy Isa. 6.2 3. And who knowes not we owne grace as our own my prayers my faith my holiness my tears as if grace had a relish from self not from God but Paul 1 Cor. 15.10 Not I but the grace of God not my grace in me that was with me 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4. But is there no paction between GOD and the creature Surely we must say that the covenant between GOD and Adam is of another nature yea and promises also then these that are between man and man for there is proper giving and taking betwixt the creature 2. The proper covenants between man and man require that both parties be free and independent one of another there may interveen a jus a right and a debt upon the promissor to him to whom the promise is made Omne promissum ex ore fideli cadit in debitum Jurists say there is no proper binding Covenants between the father and the son the lord and the servant for the son and the servant are not lords of themselves nor sui juris The father by no paction can remove the foundation of the debt of nature that the son oweth to the father for impossible it is but if such a man be son to such a man but he owe to his father as to an instrument quod sit vivat being and living and the son can not satisfie by paying the father for that summe and the father can not cancell the band nor give him an acquittance Far lesse can any recompence the Lord for life and being The fallen Angels and damned in hell and all wicked men are in the Lords Compt-book everlasting debters to him for being But God who is more then a Father to whom men are but painted fathers may thus farre loose the bond as he may command the son to sacrifice the father as well as once he commanded the father Abraham to offer up his son to God But God cannot resigne his right that he hath over the creature to a creature because he cannot leave off to be Creator and so cannot lay aside or make over Creator-right jus Creatoris to any 2. Say that a creature had a jus or right over the Creator it is either an uncreated right or a created right so to pursue God by Law as to cause him do him justice it cannot be an uncreated right for that were near to blasphemie For no created head can bear the royall Crown of the King of Ages If it be a created right this created right must be under the dominion of him who is universall Lord of all then may the Lord make use of it at his pleasure then may not the man make use of it at his pleasure for an absolute dominion of one and the same thing cannot be in the hands of two absolute Lords who may have contradictory desires concerning the same thing such as the holy Lord and sinfull men often are Let us correct the bold pleadings and the daring charges that our vain hearts put upon the Lord Why dost thou strive against him saith Elihu Job 33.13 for he gives not account of any of his matters Men dare say when they are under the vengeance of ordinary sufferings The wayes of the Lord are not equal Ezek. 33.10 If our transgressions and our sins be upon us and we pine away in them how shall we then live But upon whom should sins and transgressions and the punishment thereof be if not upon the carcases of the Authors Will ye raise letters to summond him Where is the judge Where is the Tribunall But he promised so and so But this is not the Question of strict justice that saith something against the veracity and faithfulnesse of God but nothing against the justice But neither doth a promise as a promise raise a plea of unjustice against the holy and glorious Lord suppose he should not fulfill his promise For 1. A paction by promise creats no equality of justice between thing and thing between wage and work otherwise he that is called to the Vineyard and labours from the third hour hath a just plea for he should have more wages then a penny which he gets who labours but one hour But the Lord makes not the equality or proportion between much labouring for many hours and the quantity and degree of the wage his râ—le But the Lord pleads the free Covenant for his standing rule Mat. 20.13 Friend I do thee no worng didst thou not agree with me for a penny And vers 15. Is it not lawfull for me to do what I will with mine own Hence read our sickly queroulus nature 1. Naturally we argue from much working and would conclude God much running long sweaâ—ing and pains in keeping the Covenant of Works should binde God except he be unjust to give me as many ounces and pound weights of Glory everlasting as I have fasted moments and told over prayers upon beads and uttered sighs Wherefore have we fasted and thou seesâ— not We work and keep the Covenant of Works but God payes us not our wage Though
man sins not before God nor against the law of the land in that he lives nor can he be called an usurper and unjust malae fidei possessour of his life For the sentence was not that he should take away his life with his own hand but that it should be taken away by the judiciall hand and executioner of the Magistrate Nor is this Providentiall right a right of meer permission but of positive donation and free-gift for then we might by the same reason say that Reprobate men have a right of meer permission to keep and injoy the knowledge of these that God is Superiours Parents are to be honoured the whole is more then the part Yea they have the same naturall and providentiall right by nature that other sinners have to the one as to the other 2. These who injoy that of which they deserve to be deprived they sin in the act of using as touching the substance of the act of living being eating drinking That is most false These who injoy that of which they deserve to be deprived they in modo in the way maner and end of living eating c. do sin It is true and such have not spirituall and supernaturall right in Christ which they ought to have if they be in the Visible Church and hearers of the Gospel to life being and the creatures and they sin in not believing Rom. 14. not eating for the Glory of God 1 Cor. 10.31 Naturall men care not if they have and injoy things so they have them They have being so have earth stones c. they live so doe trees and hearbs they have health so have beasts and birds they swallow up many years so do Ravens and Harts and other beasts a long lump many thousand yairds and miles of life are sought diu sunt non diu vivunt But who lives for God who sleeps who wakes who eats for God and his Glory and they who make themselves their last end Idolatrously put self in the roome of God who only is the last end of all Rom. 11.36 Rev. 4.11 Prov. 16.4 and as good make self the first Author of Heaven and Earth and Creator as the last end Ye who eat and drink who pays your reckoning Christ Or are you usurpers Have you any Charter Or do ye robbe the Lord Q. What way is God ours A. By Covenant Ezek. 34.24 Genes 17.7 Jere. 32.38 Zech. 13.9 But he is not ours as if we had some gifted right and dominion over him as we have over the creatures 2. Nor is he ours as we are his the clay hath no soveraignty over the Potter Nor 3. is God simply as God ours but God as it were coming down in Christ to us Covenant-wayes as God incarnate to make out his goodnesse grace mercy to and for us 4. It s true God incarnate Christ is principally Gods 1 Cor. 3.21 not ours He is all for God he is Immanuel our Immanuel in order to save us and so is more ours then the God of Angels 2. God is the fluier of the Saints desire more to them then all heaven in the length and breadth thereof and all the inhabitants thereof Psal. 73.25 Isa. 63.16 more then all the Angels and Saints 1 Thes. 4.16 2. There is no hell to Christ but afar off God Psal. 22.1 Math. 27.45 no heaven but the glory he had with the father John 17.5 3. There is nothing more like a spiritual disposition then when the Spouse Cant. 3. hath soul-love to Christ I sought him whom my soul loved 2. She hath an ardent desire after him I sought him but I found him not 3. There could not be such diligent search after she found him if there had not been strong faith 4. And her conference with the watchmen Saw ye him whom my soul loveth saith She enjoyed Ordinances and means yet there may be which is to be observed a furniture of grace and a want of Christ I went a little further I found him whom my soul loveth Cant. 5. There is 1. a waking heart 2. A discerning of the Beloved and a telling over again of his words Open to me my sister c. 3. A stirring of Christs hand upon the key-hole of the heart 4. A moving of the bowels for him 5. A seeking of him and a praying but no finding nor answer 6. A love-sicknesse for him and yet a missing of himself I sought him but I found him not So compare Cant. 1.1 4. with Cant. 2 3 4. with v. 6 8. and other places it will be clear a God-head can only quiet the spirit and that its a question whether we know the field where the Pearle is and the Rubies Saphirs precious stones that are hid here which do in worth exceed the capapacity of Angels and Saints Therefore should his glory be the last end and stirrer of us in all our actings and grace the only efficient in all and so much of God if he be ours by Covenant as our wayes intentions may smell of him But there is much of the creature of self of gain of empty glory in our spirituall actings God weighs not down the creature nor heaven and union with Christ as Exod. 32.32 Rom. 9.3 2. It s a spirituall soul that misseth God rather then the train of all the graces of faith love hope dâ—siâ—e of and joying in him And know he is away though heaven were in the heart and can discern when the Ordinances are empty 3. It engages all we are hands knees body Exo. 20.5 Psal. 44.20 1 Cor. 6.19 self to be for God and to live wholly in him not in our selves 4. We are not to believe in believing nor to be sick of love with the love of Christ nor to make a god of faith or love It s a spirituall condition to have grace and to misse Christ. CHAP. X. Q. WHat are the false grounds of the Lords making the Covenant of Grace A. There are two bastard grounds devised by Arminians 1. Because the Covenant of Works cannot oblidge both to active and passive obedience but to one of them only say they and the Covenant of Works was so rigid that God could not follow it out and cast infants in hell for a sin which is theirs only by imputation and was pardoned to the first man that committed it Therefore he was necessitated to make a Covenant of Grace with all mankind none excepted But the Covenant of Works is broken and can now be a way of Justification and salvation to none but yet it oblidges all And sin cannot make us lawlesse for the spirituall Law is of an eternall obligation 2. They that never heard of Christ perish by the Law and not by the Covenant of Grace of which they never heard and the Gospel is written in the heart of none 3. The first Covenant was holy and spirituall and God should unjustly threaten death upon infants if they be not guilty of
eternall condemnation as Arminius disp pub 7. th 16.3 and the Scripture saith infants are guilty of this sin Eph. 2.3 Rom. 5. Psal. 51.5 Job 14.4 As also Christ must not have died for the sins of Infants if there be no sin in them they need not the ransome of Christs Blood The other bastard ground is the naturall antecedent desire and love of God to have all saved moved him say they to make this Covenant of Grace with all But this makes away free-grace and changes God as the blind Talmud which saith God hath a secret place in which he afflicts himself because he burnt the Temple and delivered the Jews to captivitie As also the Lord remembring the captivity of the Jews and their desolation he powres out two tears every day in the Sea or Ocean and for grief smites his breasts with both his hands And the Alcoran saith that God and the Angels wish well to Mahomet but cannot free him from death So made the Heathen their Jupiter to deplore the destinies which he could not amend And what is this but to say God hath passionate desires to have all Elect and Reprobat Men and Angels to obey and be eternally saved but he cannot help the matter and therefore must upon the same account be sorrowfull and mourn that he cannot get all saved which destroyes the power of grace and restrains the out-goings of free-love CHAP. XI The three-fold Covenant considered 2. The Law pressed upon Israel was not a Covenant of Works but a darker dispensation of Grace 3. The three-fold Covenant of Arminians refuted 4. Diverse considerations of the Law and the Gospel THere be who hold that there be three Covenants 1. A Covenant of Nature whereby God as Creator required perfect obedience from Adam in Paradice with promise of life and threatning of death 2. The Covenant of Grace whereby he promises life and forgivenesse in Christs Blood to believers 3. A subservient Covenant made 1. With Israel not witâ— Adam and all mankinde 2. For a time with Israel not for ever as the naturall Covenant 3. In Mount Sinai not in Paradice 4. To terrifie and keep in bondage the other from an inward principle required obedience 5. To restrain Israel from outward sins to prove the people that the fear of God might be before their eyes that they should not sin So they expound Exo. 20.20 the other Covenant was to restrain from all sin Yea and so was that on Mount Sinai to do all that are written in the Book of the Law Deut. 27.26 Deut. 28.1 2 3 4. c. to that same end to love God with all the heart and with all the soul Deut. 10.12 Deut. 5.1 2 3. Deut. 6.1 2 3. Deut. 5.29 Deut. 6.5 With all the heart with all the soul with all the might which is expounded by Christ Mat. 22.37 Luke 10.27 in as full a hight of perfection as ever was required of Adam 6. It was written to Israel in Tables of stone The naturall Covenant was written in the heart so was there a circumcised heart promised to Israel Deut. 30.6 though sparingly 7. It was say they given by the Mediator Moses as that of nature was without a Mediator Yea Moses was the Typical Mediator of the young Covenant of Grace The differences between the subservient Covenant and that of Grace 1. In the subservient God only approves righteousnesse and condemnes sin in that of Grace he pardons and renues Ans. Acts 15.11 We beleeve through the Grace of the Lord Jesus we shall be saved even as they under that Covenant Acts 10.43 To him gave all the Prophets witnesse that through his Name whosoever beleeveth in him shall receive remission of sins Abraham and David were justified in that sin was not imputed to them not by works Rom. 4.1 2 3 6 7 8 9 c. Gen. 15.6 Psal. 32.1.2.5 I said I will confesse my transgression and thou forgavest the iniquity of my sin Isa. 4325. I euen I am he that blots out thy transgressions for my own sake and I will not remember thy sins So David was a man according to the heart of God So Asa Josiah Jehoshaphat Samuel Baruch Gedeon Daniel the Prophets under that subservient Covenant except they be under a fourth Covenant were renued justified saved by faith Heb. 11. as under a Covenant of Grace 2. The former was do and live this was believe and live Ans. Doing and living was but a shuting them up under the Law that they might flee to Christ in whom they beleeved else the fathers must be saved and justified by works contrair to Rom. 2. Rom. 4. Heb. 11. 3. In antiquity the former came in as added 430. years after the promise of grace Gal. 3.17 Ans. True but he speaks of the Covenant in Sinai according to the strict Law part which could not save and so its different But that proves not two Covenants 4. In the former is compulsion and the Spirit of bondage in this heart inclining freedom and the Spirit of Adoption Ans. Yet the differences are accidentall there was a legall awing of the hearts as if they had been Servants yet Heirs and Sons they were Gal. 4.1 2. The whole Book of the Proverbs spake to the Godly as to Adopted Sons They were beleevers Heb. 11. Rom. 4. Acts 10.43 and so Sons as touching a spirituall state John 1.11 12. In regard of Oeconomie it was somewhat more rigid and legall they were restrained as servants Yet it was the Covenant of Grace by which beleeving Jews were justified and saved Acts 15. v. 11. Acts 10.43 5. In the former man is dead in this man is humbled for sinne Answ. Legally dead except they would flee to Christ and legally condemned but there was true humiliation for sins under that Covenant As David Josiah Hezekiah and all beleevers then as now were pardoned and justified 6. In the former there are commands not strength but here there be promises and grace given Ans. The full abundance of grace and of a new heart was reserved untill now And the Law could not make perfect nor give pardon in the blood of beasts as touching that legall dispensation But both grace the Spirit pardon righteousnesse and life were received and beleeved by looking on Christ to come 7. In the former Canaan was promised in this Heaven Ans. Canaan is promised only but sacramentally and that was a poedagogicall promise for the infancie of that Church but a type which was then in that Covenant and is not now make not two Covenants one then and another now Except ye say there was then a Lamb in the Passeover which was a Type of Christ to come and there is now no such Type because the body is come and Christ the true High Priest offered himself Therefore there are two Christs one then to come another now who hath come already The Lords dispensation with Israel is often called a Covenant now
For there be maâ—y Nations who never heard of Christ and understand not writing or any of the commonest Latine and Greek and there is not any such decree revealed in the word and we can not but know such gifts of Tongues are not bestowed on men and without this it is physically impossible to communicate the Gospel It shall not help to say that Christians should travell to all Countreys and learn their Tongues that so they may communicate the Gospel and it is their sin they do not so And therefore God hath decreed that the Gospel may be offered and Christ applicable Ans. 1. What shall become of the aged and of multitudes for whom Christ died who must die in Paganism before Christians can be so mixed and learn the Tongues of all Nations under Heaven 2. Did ever the Apostles to whom the Lord gave the gift of the tongues go to this Nation and not to this but by the call of the Spirit to Macedonia not to Bythinia Act. 16 Is there no call of God now required for spreading of the Gospel Some Nations would kill them some would persecute Christians to death and not receive them in the mean time many for whom Christ died perish 3. Show from Scripture that it is the duty of Christians to mix themselves with all Nations and to learn their Language and that they sin in not doing so Nor let it be said into what Nâ—tion soever I come I may say if thou beleeve in Christ thou shalt be saved Ans. 1. You can not say that except you Pâ—each the Gospel to them For they are not oblidged to believe upon one sentence and if you Preach the Gospel to the Nation God â—â—th some chosen ones there and it is no more a Pagan Nation 〈◊〉 Yoâ— are to say to any one by your way thou art oblidged â—o beleeve that Christ satisfied for all thy sins and for the sins of the whole world but that is a lie which you teach Pagans as a principle of the Gospel 3. It s false that I may say and Preach truely such a thing to every Nation and all in it 4. Nor is it physically possible that Christians can so speak to all and every old and young Also all is indeed referred to the free-will except the Authors say that God doth insuperably determine the will of the Elect to beleeve and the places speak of thâ—â—fficacious redemption of the Elect only But so God had two intentions in Christs dying one generall to render all mankind saveable another speciall actually to save the Elect. But 1. who can beleeve multiplied intentions in God of half redemption from wrath and of whole redemption from both vain conversation and â—â—ath upon their bare word when the Scripture saith Christ in suffeâ—ing without the Camp suffered for the world of Jew and Gentiles that he might sanctifie them he died for 2. What warrand to separate these two conjoined by God to wit that CHRIST should bear on the Crosse the sins of reprobate and not intend that they should die to sin and be redeemed but not from all iniquity be loved and washen and not made Kings and Priests to God That Christ should be wounded for the transgressions of many and yet the chastisement of his peace not be upon them 3. The dying for all and every one cannot be conditionall in so far as the condition is referred to dying to wit if they believe for so believing must go before dying either really which is manifestly false for multitudes for whom Christ dyed had neithâ—r being nor believing when he dyed for them Or in the prescience of God and that destroyes their principles for so Christ cannot have died for all and every one foreseeing that all and every one would believe for he never foresaw that the Reprobate should believe Then must the condition of dying or Redeeming or of paying the ransone of His blood these being all one be referred to Gods accepting of Christs death for so many or for all if they should believe And the same way the Argument is as formerly For God accepteth the payed ransome for all and every one if they all really believe or if they all and every one be foreseen of God to believe befâ—re the Lords accepting of them Both are false as is evidâ—â—t 〈…〉 they say in the issue what we say and contradict themselves to wit that believers and only believers are these for whom Christ died We before said the promises are conditionally to all within the Visible Church but so as the condition relates only to the benefite promised we shall have remission and life if we believe but not otherwise But now the Covenant-promise which is accepted of and assented unto by Professors in their very profession in themselves or their pâ—â—â—nts is absolutely made to all within the Visible Church and they are Covenant-wayes ingadged and say and professe they are the Lords people and they take him and no other for thâ—â—r God whether they obey and believe or no for a people not right in heart may bind themselves in Covenant with God Deâ—â— 29.10 11 12 13 14. compared with 21 22 23. Deut. 31.27 Jâ—sh 24.22 compared with Judg. 2.12 13. So God absolutely intends to save all for whom Christ dies and by his death intends to give a price to redeem them from hell and from unbelief or their vain conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 from all iniquitie Tit. 2.14 from this present evill world Gal. 1.14 Ergo from finall unbeleef the greatest iniquity of a present evill world But here the case widely varies upon no condition that we can read in holy Scripture gave Christ a price a ransome of blood to redeem men from unbeleef and from all iniquitie this price must be absolutely given and grace purchased to all whose sins Christ did â—ear in the Crosse that they may beleâ—ve that they may be sanctified Heb. 13.12 1 Pet. 2.24 2. Sinnes of Thomas refusing to beleeve the resurrection of Christ and of Peter denying the Lord before men and the Gospel-sinnes of beleevers after they are justified and are inlightened must be sins against the Covenant of Grace as well as against the Law And the denying of Christ before men hath a sad threatning of everlasting death Matth. 10.32 Mar. 8.38 annexed to it if they repent not And shall these within the Visible Church who receive not Christ be in a harder condition then Sodom and Gomorrah Matth. 10.14 15. if no sins against the Gospel be punished with eternall death but only unbelief Yea the Scripture saith such as live in the Visible Church and are in Covenant with God not only for finall unbelief are condemned but because they are unrighteous fornicators idolaters adulterers 1 Cor. 6.9 whoremongers unclean covetous persons Eph. 5.5 6. murtherers sorcerers dogs liers Rev. 21.8 Rev. 22.15 for all their ungodly deeds and hard spâ—eches Jude v. 15. 2 Pet. 2.17 for all disobedience 1 Cor.
4.5 Matth. 12.36 37. they are everlastingly punished And if Christ have suffered on the Crosse for all the sinnes of the Reprobate how are they judged and condemned for these sins as the Scripture saith And what Scripture saith they are condemned for the guilt of only unbelief or that Pagans are condemned for Gospel-unbelief where as Sodom Gomorrah Mat. 10.15 the men of Niniveh Mat. 12.41 Tyrus and Sidon Mat. 11.21 and such as have sinned without the Law Rom. 2.12 13 14 15. are freed of Gospel-guiltinesse and condemned for sinnes against the Law and yet this same way saith that there is a Gospel-Covenant made with all even thousands of Pagans who never heard of a Gospel never ingadged themselves by any profession to take the Lord for their God in Christ yet Christ bare their sins on the Tree and made his blood applicable to them by a Gospel-Covenant if they shall beleeve Whence they must all break the Covenant of Grace of which many of them never heard and be condemned for no sins but the last act of Sodomy gluttony parricide for the Gospel threatteneth not death to any sin but to finall unbelief say they There are not any sinnes committed against the Gospel but they are also sinnes against the Law because God incarnate and Immanuel is God and leaves not off to be God consubstantiall with the Father because he assumes the nature of man Then as the first Command oblidgeth Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac when God shall reveal that Command and Moses and the people are by that first Command to believe their deliverance out of Egypt and so if the firâ—â— Command oblidge us to believe and obey all Commands and Promises and Threatnings of God revealed and to be revealed because the Lord is God then must Christ God Redeemer and Immanuel be beleeved by this Command and so finall unbelief and finall despising of Christ God Redeemer is as directly against the first Command and so not a sin only threatned and forbidden in the Gospel as simple unbelief and simple despising of Christ God Redeemer For the believing final believing and unbelief and unbelief continuing to the end differ in the accident of duration not in nature and essence As a Rose that grows for a moneth only and a Rose of the same nature that groweth and flourisheth for three moneths Otherwise Christ could not have pronounced Peter blessed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mat. 16.17 in the present for believing in the present for he should not have been blessed to the end as Solon said of his blessed man And this cannot but subvert our faith crush the peace hope consolation of weak Believers to whom undoubtedly the promise of perseverance iâ—â—bsolutely made Jer. 31.31 35. Jer. 32.39 40. Isai. 54.10 Isai. 59.20 21. Joh. 4.14 Joh. 10.27 28. 2. If there be as formall a transgression of the fiâ—st Command in finall unbelief as in unbelief simply considered and in the other sins of Judas and other Apostates Why but as Christ bare in his body the sins of unbelief and satisfied for them he must so also bear the sins of finall rebellion and unbelief And shall we believe that Christ payed a satisfactory ransone of blood upon the crosse for the yesterdayes unbelief of Judas and not for the dayes unbelief If it be said No man can break the Gospel-Covenant for it is an everlasting Covenant Ans. It s an everlasting Covenant but yet all who sin against the commanding love and authority of our Immanuel especially they so professing to be his do truly break the Covenant but they so break it as it leaves not off to be the Covenant of life both to the breakers if they repent and beleeve and to others for so is the nature of this Covenant and so it is everlasting but the Covenant of Works if once broken ceases to be a Covenant of life for ever because the nature of it is to admit of no repentance at all Obj. Does not the Law command the sinner offending God to mourn and be humbled and confesse Ans. It doth But it injoines not repentance as a way of life with a promise of life to the repenter as the Law or as a Covenant of Works commands to its native and proper Covenanters obedience and every single act of obedience as a way to obtain the reward of a Law-life nor does the Law as a Covenant of Works command justifying faith and reliance upon God Redeemer or Immanuel but rather as the Law of Nature or as the Law of thankfulnesse to a Ransoning and Redeeming God the Law does this Though in a speciall Covenant way the Gospel command faith in Christ. Obj. But finall unbeleef as against God Redeemer and so considered is the only breach of the Covenant of Grace He that beleeves not is condemned as the man that rejects the only remedie of sin Ans. The only breach of the Covenant of Grace is too narrow to be the adequat cause of damnation for many Pagans who never heard of Christ and are under no Covenant but that of Works are condemned not for not beleeving in him of whom they never heard Rom. 10.14 nor for breach of the Covenant of Grace but for breach of the Covenant of Works 2. Unbelief may be called the nearest cause of damnation to such as 〈◊〉 within the Visible Church as the wilfull refusing of medicine which only and infallibly would heal the sick man of such a disease is the cause of his death but is the Morall cause For the disease it self is the Physicall cause or the materiall cause of the mans death And without doubt uncleannesse covetousnesse sorcerie lying idolatrie c. and many the like sinnes beside unbeleef are 1 Cor. 6.9 Eph. 5.5 6. Rev. 21.8 Rev. 22.15 Jud. 6.7 8. 2 Pet. 2.17.10 11 12 13 2 Thes. 2.9 10. 1 Pet. 4.3 4. 2 Pet. 2.2 3 4 5. the causes of the damnation of many visible professours where as this way saith Christ did satisfie upon the Crosse for all thâ—se sins and the damned of visible professours suffer in hell only for finall unbeleef And it seems unjust that both Christ and they should suffer satisfactory punishment for these same sins done against the Law And as strange that Châ—â—st should die for any and not die for their sinnes since the Scripture useth the word of dying for sinnes Rom. 4.25 delivered from our sinnes Christ is a pâ—opitiation for our sinnes and the same way not for ours only but for the sinnes of the whole world he died for sinners Heb. 2.17 that he might make reconciliation for the sinnes of the people that is for the sinfull people or sinners Heb. 9.28 so Christ was once offered to bear the sinnes of many That is to bear the sins of the sinfull many that he died for Heb. 10.12 But this man after he had offered one sacrifice for sin sat down on the right hand of God that is after
the Church Eph. 1.22 Col. 1.18 And whereas the Head hath merited faith to the Reprobate and that absolutely for a condition is not possible he should bestow it absolutely else there is no seriousnesse in the command of beleeving And since faith is no meritorious cause of right to remission and life eternall nor a cause in part or in whole of our compleat and actuall reconciliation it may well be said that they all are compleatly reconciled pardoned justified washen in Christs blood when nothing is wanting that compleats the nature of remission and justification for faith is only a condition applying not a cause buying nor satisfying for us and no cause giving in part or in whole any new right 3. Conclus Should we by faith have right to the promise of a new heart by beleeving we should have a new heart before we have a new heart for none can beleeve savingly any promise and so neither can he beleeve that promise that God shall give a new heart untill the habit of faith which is a speciall part of the new heart be infused For actuall faith must flow from habituall faith Therefore right to that promise must be absolutely purchased by the death of Christ to the elect before they beleeve Quest. How is it that not only penally but intrinsecally and formally we sinned in Adam and are inherenter sinners in him but we are righteous in Christ only imputativè and why should not Christ be named formally the sinner since he is made by imputation the sinner As Adams sin is ours by imputation and we formally and inherently are sinners in Adam Ans. How we sinned in Adam is a point of greater difficulty For this first sin the tottering and reeling of the specifick common nature in Adam is ours not because he is our father 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by nature though that be a ground of the imputation also but because he is such a father by Covenant and Law the Law and Covenant of Works being laid in pawnd in his hand There be three parts of Originall sin A partaking of the first sin of Adam we all sinned in him Rom. 5.12 14 15. 2. The want of the Image of God called the Glory of God Rom. 3.23 3. Concupiscence and a bentnesse of nature to sin Rom. 7.7 14 17 18 23 24. As to the first Adams sin is ours really and truely not so much because it is ours as because it is imputed to be ours by God who so contrived the Law of Works as it should be made with Adam not as a single father but with Adam as a publick person representing all man and having our common nature as a father both by nature and Law which came from the meer free-will of God 1. Who might so have contrived the first Covenant of Works that sin should only have been Adams own sin not the sin of his posterity For by no necessity of nature which is antecedent to the free decree of God are all mankind legally in Adams loins though naturally they be 2. But children are as naturally in their nearest fathers loines as we are all in the loines of Adam and all men are equally of that same specifick nature with their nearest Parents as with their first Parents Yet the sins of the nearest Parents by no necessity are alwayes charged upon the children but now all have sinned in Adam Rom. 5.12 18. 3. Where a sin is inherently and personally there is no need of imputation which is a free Act of God had Christ been inherently and personally the sinner God needed not make him or impute our sins to him as Isai. 53.6 2 Cor. 5.21 and if we had been intrinsecally sinners in Adam his sin had been ours as intrinsecally as it was Adams and as Adam was not the first who sinned by imputation but personally and intrinsecally so neither should Adams sin have been our sin by imputation but intrinsecally and personally now the Scripture saith Rom. 5.19 By one mans disobedience many were made sinners 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 then they were not intrinsecally sinners before they were made that is before they were reputed sinners in Adam or before Adams sin was imputed to them as we are not intrinsecally righteous in Christ before we be justified and made or reputed righteous in Christ When therefore our Divines say wee are as guilty of eating the forbidden fruit as if our hands were there and our teeth and we did eat in him the speech cannot be taken physically personally for we were not then born but morally and legally but our nature was legally there But when the Elect does sin Christ is not said to have been in our loines legally but he was made sin he was punished so as if he had been the sinner though there was in Christ no formall guiltinesse no reatus culpae but reatus paenae But we are deprived of the Image of God and inclined to all sin not by imputation as the young Lion and the young Serpent have not the bloody and the stinging nature of the old Lion and the old Serpent by imputation but by naturall and intrinsecall inherencie Now our holie harmlesse and undefiled High Priest hath no sin in him by inherencie 3. A legall satisfaction and paying of a summe yea more then the debter was owing can never take away a morally inherent guiltinesse nor inherently justifie and make innocent the sinner and make him one who hath never borrowed the money and wasted it or one who hath never sinned in Adam and who hath never sinned in his own person Yea the Law of Works standing as it is most spiritual and holy It is 〈◊〉 impossible that he who hath once broken the Law though he be made inherently most holy and perfectly sanctified can be made righteous which requires there shall never be one the least sin committed and what is done cannot be undone 2. The suffering of another as of the Man Christ may well stand for what we should have suffered but cannot remove the inherent blot of sin and remove fundamental guiltinesse The paying a thousand Crowns for him who borrowed five hundreth Crowns and spent them on harlotry and drunkennesse may free the debter from being in Law lyable to pay the five hundreth Crowns but can never free him from being an unjust borrower and a profuse waster 3. The two Covenants of Works and of Grace standing its impossible that the active obedience of Christ can make us actively and inherently righteous or restore to us our lost innocency CHAP. III. How Christ suffered for us in our roome and place 2. He died not for all and every one 3. How many wayes Christ is said to die in our stead 4. The Lords so dying for all makes not all saveable nor the Gospel Preachable to all Nations 5. Christ died in the stead of the Elect. THe Lord Jesus hath a roome in each Covenant of Works and of Grace
In the Covenant of Works as a sufferer for the breach of it It s said by Learned Davenantius one is said truely and properly to die for another who dies to procure his good though the other by his own fault get no good of his dying for him But there is not such a Question as this whether one may truely and properly die for another but whether Christ in the sense of the Holy Ghost died verè propriè truely and properly the just for the unjust to procure good to the unjust and yet these unjust may eternally perish and reap no good by Christs dying through their unbeleef 2. Will it not follow that Christ 1. died truely and properly for all and yet non obstante morte Christi notwithstanding of the Lords dying all the world may eternally perish as say Arminians and Socinians 3. It shall follow that the immediate yet the compleat effect of Christs death is not actuall but possible saving of all And Christ hath verè propriè truelie and properly died for them Nor 4. is it enough to say that Christ had a speciall intention in dying for the Elect to give them faith but he had no such intention in dying for the Reprobate But hence it follows that Christ as properly and truely died for the Reprobate as for the Elect as touching the nature and intention of his dying and that he offered as sufficient a ransome for the one as for the other and that is a meer possible ransome but as concerning the intention to apply effectually or no effectuall intention to apply the death there 's the difference But 1. we aske for Scripture where it is said CHRIST dying as dying for the world had these two contrair intentions The Scripture saith Christ died to gather his scattered children Joh. 11.5 to bring to God 1 Pet. 3.18 these for whom he died that they might have life Joh. 10.11 live to God 2 Cor. 5.15 die to sin 1 Pet. 2.24 be redeemed from their vain conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 be delivered from this present evill world Gal. 1.4 Here is our effectuall intention where is there a place for his dying with no effectuall intention to bring any to God and yet he dyed for all good and evill to make salvation possible say they It is not enough to coyn two intentions in Christ-God-Man dying and give us Scripture for one of them only and bid us take the other on trust 2. Nor is it enough to say all these places speak of Christs effectuall dying for his Elect only For 1. it is not truely nor properly said that Christ effectually died for the Elect only for he effectually died for no man by this way because he died only to make salvation possible to all so as they might perish for ever notwithstanding of his dying for them So the efficacy of dying is in Christs intention and application Now efficacy of intention and efficacy of application are both extrinsecall to his laying down his life 2. The place 2 Cor. 5.15 cannot be expounded by them of only the effect For it speaks as they expone it of Christ dying for all that were dead as v. 14. and these they say are Elect and Reprobate 3. Nothing is said whether Christ on the Crosse did sustain the person of all for whom he died Elect and Reprobate and whether he sustained two persons for he was cut off but not for himself Dan. 9.26 one for the Reprobate another for the Elect And whether he finished the transgression and made an end of sins as Daniel saith 9.24 that is of all sins and transgressions finall unbeleef and all others For except he did that hee cannot finish the transgression make an end of sins make reconciliation for iniquity and bring in everlasting righteousnesse to these for whom he died Except either he bring in half a righteousnesse or at least imperfect and never make an end of some sins and transgressions because men will not have it so and set bounds to the infinit sufficiency of Christ Oâ— because he puts an end of sin and brings in everlasting righteousnesse conditionally and is gracious and mercifull as men will and decrees to show mercy not upon discriminating rebellion or upon unbeleef which separateth a Reprobate from an Elect if so it seems good to men and if man shall have mercy on whom he will and harden whom he will or which is all one if man shall have mercy upon himself because he will or harden himself because he will harden himself Yet may it be disputable to some whethâ—r grace by which one is effectually drawn to Christ rather then another be the grace of predestination continuated and so before Christs death or a fruit of Christs death and so after But it may well be sâ—id that every created saving grace is a fruit of Christs death and that we receive the habit of saving grace out of his fulnesse and the saving habit infused separateth an Elect from a Reprobate For it is peculiar to Beleevers and the Elect to be gifted with one heart Ezek. 11.19 and a new heart in the habit Ezek. 36.26 and with the spirit 〈◊〉 grace and supplication to beleeve and mourn Zech. 12.10 and the Spirit and blessing that is powred on the thirsty ground and the seed Isai. 44.3 And so must we say that the same habit as actuated by the Lords Spirit and as it makes one to beleeve and draws him effectually to the Son actually and efficaciously and draws not another is a fruit of Christs death but this way must glory be a fruit of the death of Christ but not habituall saving grace 2. The death of Christ for all is as common a means of salvation as the Preaching of the Gospel And both must be made effectuall by efficacious grace which is not the fruit of the merit of Christ by this way and since grace to actually apply the death of Christ is not given to Pagans and millions for whom Christ died as these Authors teach how unsufficient must the death of our Lord be For it leaves faith as impossible to the reprobates as if he had never died for them for neither habituall nor actuall faith is purchased to them by this death Only the Pelagian application is left to them which they should have had suppose Christ had never died for them 2. It is to be considered how many wayes CHRIST may be said to give himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a ransome for us or in our place 1. Christ hath sufficiently died for all in their room to redeem them For pro 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for men noteth ever the decree and intention of Christ dying for men but the sufficiency and worth and intrinsecal dignity of Christs death depends not upon the decree intention of God for the worth of the death and the blood of him who is God Act. 20.28 1 Cor. 2.8 and the Lord of Glory
Christ and beleevers actually freed from satisfactory punishment So that both beleevers and Christ must actually bear the satisfactory punishment Which indeed makes beleevers half redeemers with Christ against which we disputed before 3. Arminians denies that we payed our debts to God in Christ paying them for us So that the broken man cannot be said to have satisfied the debt in and through the surety who satisfied for him which in all Law is unjust And since Arminians denies that we payed to Justice a ransome for sin because our Surety Christ payed for us he must deny that Christ was wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities or that the chastisement of our peace was upon him Contrair to Isai. 53.5 because we made him not our Mediatour and Surety but God made him Mediatour and laid our iniquities upon him Isai. 53.6 But it is accidentall in Law that the debter substitute the surety or request him to take the place of surety upon him But he is a reall and a most legall surety who not requested of free grace becomes surety and pays the very same summe in speciè in kind that the debter ought to pay this reason does prove he is both a surety and a gracious surety As a Kings son who comes in and layes down his head for a malefactor truely and really dyeth and layeth down his life in the room and place of that malefactor though there was no Covenant nor paction between him and the Kings son though neither the malefactor nor any friend in his name did request the Prince to become surety and die for him Reuben offers his two sons to Jacob as pawnds to be slain if he should not bring home Benjamin safe to the father And had Jacob accepted of the offer Reubens two sons who knew not of the bargain had been sureties for Benjamin Gen. 42.37 and Judah might have been Law-surety for Benjamin to Jacob though Benjamin requested him not to take any such place The Lord the Creditour and Christ the Cautioner did strike hands together Christ put himself in our room as an hostage pledge and surety to die for us and payed the first and second death the summe that we was owing according to a paction between the Lord and Christ and we requested not Christ to be surety only by beleeving we thank him and subscribe and say Amen to what is done But in Law we payed in regard the same nature that suffered was ours and accepted as ours But Arminians clearly refuse that Christ shall be an hostage and surety for us because the offended party of his own furnished not one that died for him and so he strikes at the root of a reall sacrifice that is satisfactory to God because one and the same cannot be both satisfied and de suo of his own furnish a satisfying surety For so as his own Socinus saith one cannot be both a satisfier and a person satisfied and this is no satisfaction at all saith Socinus 4. Our beleeving cannot effectuate this that Christ hath actually born the satisfactory punishment due to us Arminius saith that Christ hath not actu ipso actually born that punishment he must say he hath born it only potentially potentià Then its like when we beleeve he bears that punishment compleatly but he cannot die nor suffer but once only he must mean that Christ did actually bear our sins but the satisfactory punishment is not accepted as suffered in our name But our beleeving hindereth not but he hath in genere causae moralis meritoriae really as a meriting cause deserved that God in justice cannot exact from us that same satisfactory punishment that Christ hath suffered for our sins its impossible that our faith can adde any meritorious power to Christs death therefore though not in our selves and physically yet really morally legally in Christ deliverance from satisfactory punishment is due to us we being in Christ legally and life eternall is due to us being in Christ according to the rigour of justice and injuria irrogata Christo sponsori foret wrong should be done to Christ and commutative justice by which ex condigno by condignitie he hath bought freedom from hell and right to heaven to these he died for if we should suffer eternall wrath in our persons whether we beleeve or beleeve not for beleeving is no part of the meriting cause of the satisfying ransome Yea Christ by right of buying and selling and we in Christ our surety may claime freedom from the second death and right to everlasting life so as God should fail against commutative justice against Christ and break with reverence and humble submission to his Glorious Majesty be it spoken Covenant to Christ and he should buy with a price more then enough his seed and not get his wages if these he died for die the second death and come short of glory eternall if the Lord say to Christ I promise to thee a seed that they shall be delivered from the second death and have life eternall providing thou shalt give me a price abundantly sufficient to buy these to wit the life and blood of God-Man and offer thy self a sacrifice upon the Crosse to offended Justice If CHRIST shall do this and pay the ransome and Christ get no wages no saved seed but they perish through the want of faith only either must faith be a part of the ransome which none can say or then the Lord shall not keep Covenant to Christ. 5. When Arminius saith that the Lord can nullo jure by no Law nor Justice crave of us faith and conversion to God if we have payed our debts by rigour of justice exactly to God in Christ who legally in our stead and place payed for us he supposes plainly that God requires faith and obedience of us as a part of recompence made to offended Justice And Arminiâ—s saith that Christs righteousnesse is ours not as performed by him but as imputed to us by faith So that faith comes in as a collaterall price payed for us or a part of the price the very act and work of beleeving being counted ours and our righteousnesse before God Yea but God by no necessity of hurt Justice craves faith and repentance from us That CHRIST died not for our good only but in our stead is proven 1. Because Christ in some other more legall way died for us then for Angels for he died for their good that he might â—e made the Head of Angels Col. 2.10 Phil. 2.7 8 9 10 11. Rom. 10.9 11. and he died for the good of the whole Creation that he might make all things new and restore the creatures to their perfection which by the sin of man they had lost Rom. 8.20 21 22 2â— Acts 3.21 Rev. 21.5 but he died not as suffering punishment due to the Angels and the work of Creation in their stead â—s wounded for their transgressions as he died for our
die in the place and stead of sinners then to die for sinnes must be to die in the place and stead of sinnes Ans. These and the like argue much the vanity of Socinus if this be retorted as justly it may Then as Christs dying for sinners is for the good profite saving beleeving and confirming of the faith establishing the comfort of sinners then by the like Christs dying for sins must be to save sins from hell to bring sins to God that sins should not live to themselves and to establish the faith the consolation of sins whereas Christ died not for sins as for sinners that he might save sins but to dissolve the works of the devill to take away sin 1 Joh. 3.9 Joh. 1.29 Christ dies one way for sins and another way for sinners The Physitian one way cures the disease that it may be rooted out and be no more and another way the diseased person that he may live and be in health CHAP. IV. Now we are iâ— Christ dying and crucified in him 2. A twofold crucifying of us with Christ. 3. A discourse of mortification 4. The actings of the mortified 5. That we are to be mortified in our affections to every thing that is not God c. IT is objected that we was not born nor haâ— we any being when Christ died then we died not in Christ nor could we rise ascend to heaven nor sit in heavenly places with him Ans. But 1. in Physicall actions there is required the reall existence of the worker Not so in legall actions for as we had no being who now beleeve when Christ died so our sins had no being How then could our sins that were not deserve punishment Yet I desire to beleeve that Jesus Christ 1 Pet. 2.24 his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree And that he was wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities who now live Isai. 53.5 and they cannot deny this who teach that CHRIST died for the sins of the world none excepted And the child in the womb when the father is absolved from treason is really and in Law restored to his fathers inheritance And the sucking child may be Crowned a King and take possession of a Kingdom and take the oath of loyalty of the subjects in the person of another though physically he neither do nor know what is done but sleep in the armes of the nurse So we legally in CHRIST satisfied our nature in Christ was crucified and we though not born did satisfie and suffer satisfactory punishment in Christ. Heb. 1.3 Having by himself purged our sins he sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high Heb. 9.28 So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many And in him we were legally crucified and dead to the Law As Gal. 2.19 so as Christ once being dead and crucified the head and members whole Mysticall Christ is dead to the Law and Christ can die no more for he cannot satisfie and pay the debt twise And so are we in him dead to hell to wrath to Law-vengeance Sathan raises a discussed plea against the conscience thou art a sinner and under the curse of the Law There is no answer to that but by beleeving I was with Christ crucified and am dead to the Law and died to death first and second For Christ suffered mysticall Christ legally satisfied and so did I in him I speak not now of personall suffering with or for Christ and therefore that is a plea of Sathans forging and taken away And unjust summonds may be answered by non-compearance and by the appeal of faith to Christ who having payed the debt sits Judge upon his own debts which he himself payed and therefore cannot suffer these for whom he died to suffer for his proper debt which once he payed The husband cannot endure the wife to be imprisoned for the debts which he made his own and fully satisfied Obj. 2. All men must die and return to dust and so must sinners as the Law requires therefore Christ died not for thee Ans. Socinus and Crellius object the same which Sathan doth For that death in the hew and collour of Law-wrath is holden before a beleever now and then under doubting as a temptation For we suffer not death such as Christ suffered to wit for sin watered and affected with the curse of the Law nor must we measure death from body or bulk of departing but from the salt and worst of death which is the curse and that being removed we never die Joh. 11.26 Joh. 5.24 no more look upon death in the Law for there it raigns but in Christ and in him death is dead and removed the formall demeriting power is removed when the Law is satisfied And a beleever being dead to the Law is dead to the curse and to the worst of death as Christ is dead to it now Obj. 3. But the conscience of the beleever suppose there were no devill challenges him of sin and therefore that he is under a curse Ans. The conscience may be the factor and deputie of Sathan in that also for it is the deposing of Christ from his Office of Mediator in satisfying and answering by his death all the demands of the Law there is none but Christ when the Law demands blood and the torments of the second death can plead any thing on the contrair Rom. 3.19 We know that what things soever the Law speaks it speaks to these that are under the Law but the Law speaks not then to a beleever for he is under grace and so is not in tearms of treating or parleying with the Law Christ was crucified and the beleever is legally crucified with Christ buried and risen again with Christ. 1. Then the Law is not his judge it spake to Christ and condemned him and put him to death when he was under the Law and condemned you in him now you say Christ is not condemned and crucified when ye enter in a new treatie with the Law to receive a new sentence from it and thus ye undoe what Christ hath perfectly done 2. To hearken to conscience componing and making another paction with the Law then Christ hath made is to take the plea that Christ hath embarked in off his hand ye are to stand still and be silent and beleeve that Christs dying and your dying in him is a closing of a satisfactory bargain with the Law Christ condemned sin in the flesh by taking on his flesh the curse due to us for sin for sin that is for sins cause that it might be taken away he sent his Son to die Rom. 8.3 and judge and condemn sin 3. This is to mistate a question well debated and discussed by Christ for he being the end and perfection of the Law hath silenced and satisfied the Law and to what use can it serve to make a new plea and a bastard controversie with a satisfied party
so he should fail against justice with all glory to him be it spoken if he should exact these from us Christ died not for our good only but also in our stead There be considerable differences between Christs punishment and that punishmeÌ„t which was due to uâ— eternally A fivefold onenes law identity samenes betweeÌ„ Christ the surety and sinners for whom he satisfied Scripture and arguments froÌ„ Scripture prove that Christ died in our room and stead If Christ was made the curse that was due in law to us that blessing not due to us might coÌ„e upon us then he suffered in our place Oratio pro Arâ—hia Poeâ—à Oratio pro Marcello 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Demosthe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Isocrates 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Col. 1.24 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Homer 〈◊〉 5. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Three for one slain 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rex 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Il. 1. Rom 9. ◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈…〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 10.11 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 15.13 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 11.50 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 5 6· 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 v. 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Sam. 18. Syria versio Quis dabit me mori loco tui Chaldae Paraph Vellem quod mortuus essem tu mansisses â—odiè fili mi. Ge. 22. LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gen. 44. LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mar. 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mat. 20.28 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 23. dabis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Daebis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Prov. 11.8 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Job 34. â—4 Heb as before Ps. 45.16 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Job 16 4 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mat 2.22 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Trostius Syria versio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Loco Herodis patris sui 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tremel Trostius vice piscis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ro 12.17 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tremellius Trostius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pro multis sed Mat. 2.22 vertunt loco 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pro vel vice omnis hominis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 loco seu vice vestri 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 loco â—â—ium suarunt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vice populi 1 Tim. 2.6 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 loco omnis hominis 1 Pet. 2.11 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pro nobis vice nostri In stead or â—or another cannot note alwayes for the profit and good of another but it must make non-sense Socinus de Servato l. 2. c. 8. Cateches Raccoviens c. 8. pa. 183 184. The vain reason of Socinians that Christ died not in the place and room of sinners because he died not in the place and room of sinnes and transgressions retorted answered We legally died suffered for sin in Christ altho many of us for whom he died were not then born and neither we nor our sins had any being CHRIST willeth not that we answer plea's that he hath answered and that by unbeleef wee trouble our selves with debt that he hath payed Socinus de Servato l. 2. c. 8. Quomodo igitur vice loco nostri Christus est mortuus si nos quoque perpetuo â—idem mortis generi expositi sumus Crellius adversus Grotium c. 9. par 9. How wee die though Christ have died for us We depose CHRIST with reverence to his holiness from his office of Mediator when we embark having once beleeved in him in a new plea with the Law We are not to act of new a plea with the Law being now in another kingdome and freed from the Law We are not to desire a Law-wakening under Gospel-deadnesse VVe sinned in AdaÌ„ though we had neither being nor hand in making Adam either our naturall or Law-head so may we be legally crucified with Christ our surety though we had no hand in appointing Christ to be our surety All the requisits to a reall satisfaction are in Christs dying for us What mortification is Mortification comes froÌ„ Christs death as from a real cause and from a real new principle procured by the death of Christ. Gospel arguments how and upon whoÌ„ they work When reasoÌ„ is green adherence to a course by perswasion is unstable Four sorts of considerable actings in one mortified 1. No actings are in the mortified at most moving objects The motions of grace are quiet slow The actings of a mortified man in order to all created things are indifferent not peremptory not so absolutly fixed but he can qâ—iâ—e them 〈◊〉 Goâ— Actings terminated on God may be fiery Mortification sweetly closes with all providences Mortification or deadnesse meerly naturall only because the Tools are broken the horse wearied hath nothing to do with the death of CHRIST 2. Compelled mortification is not froÌ„ Christs death 3. Philosophick and bookish mortification not from Chrst crucified 4. Superstitious and religious mortification Luther Com. on Gal. 6 14 5. Pharisaâ—cal mortification 6. Civil mortification D. Preston Serm. 1. of mortification p. 8 p. 9. 1. Mortification to self 2. Mortification to will Much will much life all will is no mortification 3. Mortification to life 4. Mortification to wisdom there is a paper sicknes for maÌ„y books 5. Mortification to learning books Ptolemaeus Philadelphius King of Egypt gathered in the Bibliotheck of Alexandriâ— 40000. books ad luxuriam non ad utilitatem ait Livius and they were all burnt Serenus Sammoniâ—â—â— left in Testament to Gordianus junior three score and two thousand books Petrarcha Librorum larga copiae est operosa sed delectabilis sarcina animi jucunda distractio libri quosdam ad scientiam quosdam ad insaniam deduxere dum plus hauriâ—nt quam digerunt Vt stomachis sic ingentis nausea saepius nocuit quam fames 6. MortificatioÌ„ to riches The simple desire of riches is not the sin Whether acts of covetousnesse may consist with mortification and how 7. Deadnesse to honour Sis pro nobis peripsema Plutarchus De profectu virtutum lib. 11.5.237 Themistocles somnum sibi Miltiadis Tropheo adimi eoque se excitari electo Plutarch ib. pag. 239. Quid mihi nunciaturus es nisi Homerum revixisse Men may judg themselves mortified to honour because they are deadned to riches and not be mortified Plutarch de capienda ex hostibus utilitate lâ—bel n. 3â— pag. 241. Zeno cum nunciaretur navim ipsius qua negotiabatur fractam Bene facis inquit fortuna quae nos intra palliolum compellis All sins are not mortified with the like labour 8. Deadnesse to injuries Plutarch lib. de liberis educandis moral 1. n. 15.20 pag. 17. Aâ— si me Asinus calce feriisset jussuri eratis ut contra eum calcem impingerem Omnibus hoc ei exprobrantibus calcitronem adolescentem appellantibus