and constant custom of the Primitive and the succeeding Churches throughout the several ages to Baptize the Children of believing Parents in their Infancy then it ought to be so still continued accustomed and practised This Warrant may be Reasoned out of the word or the Reason warranted out of Matth. 19.4.9 where Christ in case of a point of difference about divorce himself argueth and reasoneth from the Ancient times and the beginning of the Church of God So out of 1 Cor. 11.16 if any man seem to be Contentious we have no such Custom neither the Churches of God Where you and I may see the case there and here to be much alike The Corinthians had got up a fashion of their mens praying covered in their long Hair and their women praying uncovered in their shorn Hair you likewise have taken up a practice of baptizing onely believers when grown persons they make profession and have shut out Infants from their right to the Seal of Baptism being Covenanters with their Parents Saint Paul refuteth that their fashion by divers arguments drawn from the headship of man over the woman from the dishonouring of the head from the shamesulness and the uncomeliness of it from the Presence of the Angels from the light of nature five good and sound arguments and when he perceived for all those that they were contentious and quarrelsome with him about and for their fashion He clappeth upon them as his last argument this taken from the Churches of God that have been before us In like manner I have refelled your Practice by sundry Warrants and Reasons raysed out of the word from such Infants some of them having the spirit and faith in some degrees from their being in the same Holy Covenant of Grace with their Parents from the proportion and succession of Baptism unto Circumcision from Baptisme's being a remedy against Original sin especially from Infants capableness of the ends effects and benefits of Baptism five good and warrantable reasons out of the word and supposing for all this you will not be conquered though overcome but will still strive and contend contrary to 2 Tim. 2.24 Now I urge upon you in the last place this Reason which is the Custom of the Church both Modern we have such a Custom of Baptizing Infants of Believing Patents and we have no Custom approved or General of Baptizing onely Grown Believers As also Ancient Neither the Churches of God have had any such For so though Saint Paul argue N gatively onely the Reason is of as much force and weight affirmatively and the Custom of the Ancient and Modern Church's is good and pleadable both against the New Lights of late scismatical Innovators as also for the old Light of former and present Orthodex Professours As for the Negative the Not or No Custom Primitive and practice Apostolieal of Baptizing again at their growth upon Confession of Faith such as had been Baptized before in their Infancy I do reserve it for at other Place your Dipping Pond of which I shall speak at last onely here I shall bring in the Affirmative That the Ancient Prinritive Churchès succeeding the Apostles what the Apostles themselve did do and practied shall hereafter soon follow did hold and practice the Baptizing of Infants And though I think it will but disturb your Brain and cause you to stop your Nostrils and Mouth who small no sweet Savour or Odour of Antiquity as being one of the New Sent or unsent rather yet notwichstanding I shall and relate the Dictates of some of the Ancient Apostles succeeding Pastors and Fathers of the Church of old and I will do it for others sake who are Lovers of Antiquity but I will do it in English for your sake whom I am Instructing who are no lover of Languages more than you can speak I know you will not take this General Custom and Practice of the Church upon my bare word and present Assertion nor do I desire you should Therefore Remember the dayes of old consider the years of many Generations ask thy Father and he will shew thee thy Elders and they will tell thee ask now of the dayes that are past which were before wheâ—â—er there hath been any such thing as the Baptizing of Infants of Believers You shall readily find the same attested by the Reverend Fathers of the Church the Bishops and Doctors of the dayes of old and years of former Generations to have been so to be the Custom and Practice In a matter of Fact or Practice one Good and Creditable witness is sufficient and that I am sure I have Saint Augustine I mean not onely for the General Practice of Infant Baptism in his dayes and those present tim 's wherein he lived as might easily be shewed our of his Books of Original Sin Chap. 40. Third Book of the Merit of Sin and Remission Chap. 9. Third Book against Julian fourth Book of Baprism against the Donatists c. But also for the former and praeceding Churches up to the Primitive dayes For so Augustine who lived in the year after the Nativity of Christ 39â— and was Presbyter first and after Bishop of Hippo saith thus in his third Epistle to Volusian The Custom of the Mother Church in Baptizing little ones is in no wise to be despised not to be thought needless and were not to be believed but that it was as Apostolicall Tradition This is a very full and clear evidence of an Ecclesiastical Custom an Apostolical Tradition whether written or unwritten that infringeth it not according to that of the Apostle 2 Thest 2.15 hold the Traditons which ye have been taught whether by word or Epistle not to be despised but believed Nor did Augustine utter this suddenly but advisedly and therefore upon second thoughts saith it over again and the more Resolutely in his 15. Sermon of the words of the Apostle Let no man saith he buz or whisper into our eares any Doctrine to the Contrary This Practice of Baptizing Ghildren The Church alwayes had this it hath this it alwayes held this it hath received from the Faith or fidelity of our Ancestors and this it keeps Constantly to the end Therefore doth the same Father so often and so much press this Argument The Churches Practice of Baptizing-Infants upon Pelagius and his followers who were Contemporary with Augustine holding Infants were not taken or tainted with original Corruption and Sin by propagation but only contracted the same by Imitation as in his 150 Epistle unto Sixtus in his second Book of Marriage and Concup 18. Chap. in his first Book against Crescon the Grammarian cap 30. in his fourth Book against the Donat. c. 23. in his sixth Book against Julian one of Pelagius his Schollars or his opinions Now if this had not been truly and undeniably The Custom and Practice of the Church even up to the first and Primitive times as Augustine affitmed Pelagius and his Disciples would soon have fallen foul upon
him as the Pharisees did upon our Saviour and have said thou bearest witness of thy self for thy self thy witness is not true they would have given a check or denyal to such a Custom accused it of Novelty or but of Yesterday and so have turned off easily that Argument which of all other lay most heavily upon them the Ancient Churches Custom and Practice in Baptizing Infants But they never did that as who could not deny this And so that other exception against Augustine as if he should utter and urge this in Heat and Passion against Pelagius his Adversary in point of Baptizing of Infants and speak more of the Custom and Practice of the Church than was true falleth of it self For they differed not in that point of Infant-Baptism no nor in the matter of the Custom of the Church herein For so Augustine affirmeth both in his first Book of the Merit and Remission of Sin The Peloagians themselves do grant that little Children are to be Baptized as who cannot come in or stand up against the Authority of the Vniversal Church delivered without doubt or Traditioned by our Lord and his Apostles And again in the eleventh Book against Caelestius and Pelagius He affirms and cites that Caelestius in a Book of his written at Rome acknowledged that Infants in a Book of his wirtten at of sin according to the Rule of the universul Church and according to the sense and meaning of the Gospel and Therefore Pelagius not daring to deny though otherwise impudent enough the General Practice of the Ancient Church in Baptizing Infants as who then and that way might have slipt his neck out of the Collaror Yoke Augustine held him to was feign to shist off that Fathers Argument as well as he could but very poorly and pittifully That the Church Baptized indeed Infants but not for the washing away of original fin which he denyed in Infants but for the better bringing them to the Kingdome of Heaven which Christ said was of such as theirs And truly this makes a great Addition to the Truth of this The Custom and Practice of the Universal Ancient Church in Baptizing lnsants that Pelagius so great a Schollar and Travellour who had seen the Customas and Practices the manners and fasthions of the Affricane and Asiatiqne yea and Europaean Churches being also himself a Brittish born should not as indeed he could not make any denyal or take any exception thereto as who by his own eyes and experience saw found it to be most true and uniform and so I may say our Baptism of Infants is a true Baptism and the Ancient Churches Practice hereof is a true Practice even our enemies themselves being Judges as Deut. 32.31 〈◊〉 why then was not Augustine himself Baptized in his In … y who was such as strong Advocate for the Baptism of Infants the Reason is plain and makes nothing against our Infant Baptism or the General Practice of the Church for neither his Father nor Mother were Christians or Believers when himself was born and they continued so untill a little before their death Augustine himself was not converted from his Manichean Haeresies and other vices untill the 31. year of his age who two years continuing a Catechumen and in the mean time writing somethings to give proof and testimony of the truth of his conversion or of his conversion to the Truth was Baptized himself and his Son Adeodate together like as Ahraham was circumcised with Ismeal his Son on the self-same day These things may be seen in His Confessions I shall need to adde no more for the shewing Infant-Baptism to have been the Custom and Practice of all the former Ancient Churches Augustines Testimony of the same is to me instead of all and as Goliahs Sword to David there is none like that Give it me 1 Sam 21.9 I have taken it and I give it thee not as a single Testimony of one Father for it but as a Quadruple witness of the Universal Church and its Custom and Practice for the point of Paedobaptism being four times expresly deliveced though by one and the same Father Saint Austin Yet I may for more perspicuity sake follow up this General Testimony by one Father unto its Particulars I mean the Covattestations of other particular Fathers in their several ages You have heard what Augustine hath said and written as for that Century For the year 390. 384. and those years wherein he lived Hierom In his Epistle ad Laetam having told her that the good and the evill of little once are imtured much to their Parents he addeth in the middle of that Epistle unless perhaps you think the Sons of Christians is they receive not Baptism They onely are guilty of sin and that the wickedness also thereof is not to be referred or to redound to the Parents who would not give it especially at or in such a time wherein they could not contradict who were to receive it In his Book against the Pelagians towards the end he is for Infant-Baptism and confirms it by allerdging the Authority of Cyprian and his Colleagues In the same third Book against Pelag it is thus Crito i.e. Pelagian saith grant me thus much at lest that they are without sin who cannot sin speaking of Infants To whom Atticus i.e. Hieronimus Answereth I will Grant it if they have been Baptized in Christ and again They are without any Sin through the Grace of God which they have received in Baptism Chrysostom Arch-Bishop of Constantinople For the year 382. in his Homil. to the Neophytes is for the Baptism of Children and in his 40. Homil upon Genes calls Baptism our Circumcision His being not Baptized untill he was 21. years of age doth not prejudice here as whose Father and Mother were not Christians at his birth and who himself was brought up under Libanius an enemy to and a scoffer at Religion but after he was instructed in the Divinity knowledge by Miletus a Bishop and Baptized of him In his Homil ad Neoph having spoken of the Honours and Benefits of Baptism he saith a little from the beginning For this cause we Baptize the little Infants that they may not be defiled with sin that to them may be added Sanctity Righteousness Adoption Inheritance Fraternity of Christ That they may be all his Members and the Habitation of the Spirit In his 40. Homil upon Genes having spoken of Circumcision appointed to the Children of the Jewes and the pain of the Incision he addeth but our Circumcision or the grace of our Baptism brings the medicine without without such dolour and Innumerable benefits with it It hath indeed no definite time set down for it as that hath but it is lawful to receive both in the first and in the middle and in the last age this not made with hands Circumcision in which there is susteined no great pain but the weight of sins are put off and Remission of them is
Ancients their dipping and immerging as I have before touched in part and now shall fully handle For 1. I have shewed how the Ancients dipped and immerged in Rivers and Fountains and Wells and Fonts or Baptisteries made so wide and big of purpose but you especially of the later brood of the Separation run out into Ponds to do the same 2. They the Ancients dipped the whole bodies of those who were baptized naked and out of the cloaths such was the Candid Innocency honesty of the old times and for other reasons I have given but you do dip your converts and proselytes covered and in their cloaths for no reasons given by you that I hear of unless it be fear lest Satan tempt you to incontinency as these last ages are very naught indeed and wicked And yet I know some of the Ancients dipped immerged but a part of the body in the water this is not yet touched upon and it will make somewhat for what I have said before of sprinkling and pouring the water upon the head of the baptized Augustine in his 4. Homil saith and so he is cited of Gratian. decret de consec distinc 4. cap. 66. Postquam vos credere promisistis tertiò capita vestra in sacro fonte demersimus and this in the words following he calls Ordo baptismatis it was the very order and manner of baptism after their confession to dip and immerge their heads in the sacred Font. And before him Hierom. Dial. adversus Luciferianos hath these words Multa quae per traditionem in Ecclesia observantur authoritatem sibi scriptae legis usurpaverunt velut in lavachro ter caput mergitare To dip and immerge the head thrice in the laver of baptism he makes it a tradition of the Church and as Authentique as if it were a Law written And before Hierom a little a matter of two years Chrysostom upon these words of John 3. Vnless a man be born of Water and the Spirit saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To those who dip and immerge their head in the water as in a sepulchre the old man is buried and overwhelmed c. Yea before him Eunomius and his followers as ever the Heretiques like Apes will be following some Ancient Customs of the Church who started up in the year 360 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when they baptize they wet them down to the breast and no lower the word is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dip and immerge strictly but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i.e. dew or wet them it may be our English dew may be derived thence and so here by the way may be a proof of the Antiquity of our aspersing or sprinkling or bedewing the baptized for which cause when they the Eunomians baptized 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is labrum quasi lavabrum in a large and ample vessel such as they used in bathes or bucks the party to be baptized standing on the outside or brim thereof 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they bowed down his head unto his breast into the water all this is reported by Theodoret. lib. 4. haeret fabularum Lastly before these it is recorded of B. Laurentius that he baptized one Lucillus and the manner this as the words in the Acts are cum expoliasset eum fudit super caput ejus when he had stript him of his cloathes he poured the water on his head these lived about Cyprians time in the year 260 recorded by Surius tom 4. in the Hist of the Martyrdom of the B. Laurentius But you as you differed from some of the Ancients in dipping and immerging cloathed bodies wheras they did them so naked so do you differ from some other of them in dipping their whole bodies down even to their feet whereas these did but their heads down to their breasts 3. The Ancients dipped those thrice whom they baptized you had but even now the Testimony of Hierom and Augustine a part of whose words I reserved for hither Qui ordo baptismatis duplici mysterii significatione celebratur The order of baptizing with thrice dipping and immerging is famous in the Churches for these two mysterious significations 1. Of three Persons of the Deity 2. Of the three dayes death and resurrection some others add a 3. of the three sorts of sin cleansed by baptism offencâ—s in thought word and deed To which may fitly come in next Teâ—tullian advers Praxeam cap. 26. Nam nec semel sed Ter ad singula nomina in personas singulas mergimur as also Athanasius in dict interp scr qu. 91. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. To dip the childe thrice in the Baptistery or Font is to signifie as above Augustine saith I might add to these Chrysostom homil De fide in Deum Patrem Filium Spiritum sanctum Ambros lib. de Sac. 2. cap. 7. Gregor Mag. in Epistela ad Leandrum And it appears that as this custome was very general so very Ancient for that Arrius also who lived in 314. some ten years before Athanasius but yet a great while after Tertullian who lived in 190. and therefore best sheweth to be ancient He I say Arrius had got up also this manner of baptizing by thrice immerging who did it for an ill purpose and proof of three natures in the Trinity and not three persons and one God as the Catholiques then spake and therefore according to Christs form baptized in the Name and not in the names for there is but one Name and so but one Divinity which when the Fathers of the Church perceived they saw good reason to change that custome and order of thrice dipping and instead thereof to use but once dipping and thereupon Gregory the Great and the 4 Tolletan Councel are very earnest about it the leaving of that Trine immersion and taking up the simple or once immersion for the avoiding of the scandaling the weak and incouraging the heretiques and lest they should seem to countenance their error when they complyed in their customes But you herein also differ from the Ancients and your practise is to dip but once for so you tell me in your Letter and that with an emphatical reduplication If he had dipt them more then once I would have expressed so in my first Letter but he did dip them but once and so in your saying twice once and again that he dipt them but once you gain-say the greater and higher Antiquity and your self too for once dipping though it was also a good old way yet it was not The good old way as you say that is it is not the best and the oldest way amongst the orthodox Ancients Not but that I acknowledge once dipping to be as efficacious to the ends and fruits of baptism and as mysterious to the signifying of the one Deity of the three holy Persons and the one Death of Christ Jesus besides that in the unity of the same faith a diverse or different custom of the Churches cannot be
Reason If Baptism be a means and Remedy to free Christian-Infants from originall sin as to guilt and punishment and the dominion thereof in them that are Eâ—ect and Beleevers Then such are and ought to be baptised The Church or Minister of it knowing nothing of this and that particular Infant but he or she may be such This Warant is reasoned out of Gods Word or this Reason is Warranted out of Gods Word Romans 6.3.4 5 6. verses We as many of us as were baptised into Christ were baptised into his death therefore we are buried with him by baptism into his death that like as Christ was raised up from the dead so we should walk in newnesse of life c. Knowing this that our old man is crucified with him that the body of sin might be destroyed that henceforth we should not serve sin I must here add a little explication lest there may be a misconstruction construction of some Popery The Popery in this poynt is this That baptism taketh away original sin that it ceaseth after baptism to be a sin properly and is nothing but a defect or weaknesse which maketh the heart fit and ready to conceive sin like Tinder which is not Fire but is apt to conceive Fire This I abandon as Popery and an Error But this I aver as Truth and Protestancy 1. That after baptism in the Elect Infants original sin is taken away as to the punishment of it for there is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Rom. 8.1 2. As to the guiltinesse of the person there being nothing to bind them to punishment if no such condemnation 3. As to the dominion of it it shall not reign in their mortal bodies nor they serve it 4. As to the Imputation of it it shall not be imputed to them but be pardoned and in that respect be as if not But for all this original sin or concupisence remaines in the Elect Infants even after baptism and ever after and is still sin and properly sin some limbs and portions of the old man and the body of sin remain even where he is said to be crucified and destroyed in the manner above and there are and will be defilements in them that are washed I must enlarge no farether here However this may be a comfort to Beleevers that in Christ the promised seed who should and did break the Serpents head which in some good sense I may call original sin there is pardon of this sin to their natural seed and therefore Christ was also born not in the ordinary way as others of Mankind but of a Virgin as conceived by the Holy Ghost that so being free himself from original all sin He might procure the pardon of the same and be a plea against it Yea though Infants in present have no actual sins yet their baptism extends its vertue to the taking away also of the guilt punishment dominion and imputation of sins to come so the party baptised stand to the order terms of Baptism which is to turn to God beleeve actually in Christ and continually renew repentance as the place above mentioned imports Romans 6.4 and thus baptism saveth 1 Peter 3.21 So doth baptism seal the Pardon as of original so also of actual sin Acts 22.16 Ananias said to Paul Arise and be baptised and wash away thy sins calling upon the name of the Lord. Oh but we commit sins dayly after baptism that after justification will the Lord continue to pardon such sins yes if we continue to repent of and purge away sich sins So 1 John 1.7 8. If we confesse our sins he is faithful and just to forgive us how faithful and just to forgive sin it implyeth that he hath somewhere bound himself by promise to do it and where and when but in baptism and to whom but the party baptised so far as sin is repented of when the Conscience makes any question whether God will continue to pardon sin the washing of Baptism doth seal the assurance thereof the person baptised may say I am assured of it I have it sealed to me so many years ago at the time of my Baptism It is also a popish device who tell you that Baptism onely serveth for Remission of sins done before and therefore for sins does after they must have a Sacrament of Penance distinct from Baptism appointed for a remedy For the Sacramental force of Baptism doth extend it self to the whole life that is to be a Seal unto them of Remission of sin in the blood of Christ And the confession of sin is but a more effectual application of the force of Baptism like as the people who were baptised of John confessed also their sins And therefore there needs no Sacrament of Repentance or Penance to be set up for this purpose after Baptism to be a second Table for Refuge after sins actually committed like as they say making Baptism but the first Table for Refuge after original sin contracted For Baptism it self is the Baptism of Repentance for the Remission of sins Mark 1.4 Christs baptism being not different from Johns Baptism as is shewed as which teacheth and ingageth us to dye unto sin and rise unto newnesse of lie Romans 6.4 Which is nothing but Repentance which is called Repentance from dead workes and so a rising from them Heb. 6.1 It would therefore much promote the good cause of Infant-Baptism if the Doctrin of original sin especially also actual were pressed and urged upon People and Parents especially a little more and they heard oftener how all Men and Women and Children born in the ordinary way sin Adams fall are born in the guilt of original sin and have a sinfull and polluted being whosoever have any being and may and must every one confesse with David I was born in sin and in iniquity hath my Mother conceived me it is plain that he confesseth not his Parents but his own sin this being the scope of the whole Psalm so with Job Who can bring that which is clean not of that which is unclean that which is born of the flesh is felesh flesh and blood cannot inherit eternal life and that by Nature we are the Children of wrath and all Infants as that in Ezekiel 16. polluted in their bloods their Fathers are Adamites their Mothers are Hevites c. This if preached and pressed would shew to Parents what great need there is of a New-Birth for their Children and so would lead and drive them to procure for them the outward washing in Baptism as a Seal of the inward washing away of that natural pollution of sin by the Spirit Thus our Saviour Christ inforces it unto Nicodemus John 3.5 and that not so immediately in reference to actual sin as original or Birth sin the natural pollution in which Infants are born and I can see no good reason to the contrary but that the outward Elementary Baptism of Water is here intended as
a Seal of the inward washing by his Spirit which is also called the washing or Laver of Regeneration Titus 3.5 Because the inward washing of the Spirit in Regeneration is sealed with the outward washing in Baptism Therefore I find it in the Ecclesiastick Histories That in those ages and places where and when the vilenesse of original pollution was best understood of Parents of Children as most preached of by the Fathers of the Church as in Augustins dayes what running there was od Parents with their Children in their armes to Baptism and why not there being no other visible ordinance appointed of God in the Church but Baptism for the washing away the guilt and filth of that Birthfin and pollution And was it not so of old wherefore did God command the Infants of the Jewes to be circumcised and wherefore were they so circumcised in the fore skin of their flesh but to shew tht the very nature was defiled which they received by carnal generation from their Parents and which they were like to traduce and conveigh to their Children and to testifie what need they had to have such original Corruption and uncircumcision of the flesh to be done away by the clensing and Regeneration Spirit of Christ sealed in their outward Circumcision And that Circumcision in the former as Baptism in the latter dispensation do both poynt at this one and the same thing the Cleming away of the pollution of the natural birth by the Spirit of Christ there is a clear Text Colossians 2.11 12 13. We now are fallen into those days wherein there have been not only shaken but rased many foundations and principles of the Doctrines of Christ especially two of those six in Hebrewes 6.2 Which are Repentance from dead workes a chief of which is original sin and the doctrine of Baptism and wherein a Spirit of Pelagianism hath entred into many and goeth about preaching unto Parents a freedom from original sin pollution in their Infants as derived from Adam and so proclaming a liberty from baptifing of them just as the impostors foretold of by Saint Peter whilest they promise them liberty they themselves are the Servants of Corruption 2 Pet. 2.19 It concerneth us therefore so much the more who are Master-builders in the House of God or but Repairers of the breaches to uphold and maintain these two foundations of the Christians Faith and to teach the people first that as themselves were so their Children are defiled with original sin and pollution by their natural birth and then next that there is no other ordinary way of clensing and washing them but by the regenerating and purifying Spirit and Grace of Christ Signified Sealed and Exhibited in andby the outward washing of Water in Baptism as pleaseth God Again I say not that Baptism doth all this from or by the deed done or work wrought which is their Popish phrase but as our Protestants say either as it is a means to give exhibite Christ with his benefits the which it doth by signification as a particular Certificate assuring forgivenesse of sins or as a token or pledge of the Grace of God confirming it Or as an instrument because in and with the right use of Baptism God confers Grace where and when he pleaseth for it is no Physicall but a Moral Instrument and sets his image or mark of Regeneration upon the party whence Baptisme is called the Laver of Regeneration God is at liberty and may when and how he pleaseth let his Grace accompany his ordinance of Baptism Which way soever God doth work these great things by or in Baptism Methinks it is a potent and invincible reason and warrant for the bringing Infants upon Baptism the onely outward ministerial remedy in the Church for the abating and abolishing the malady of original sin of which even Infants stand guilty born and conceived in it unlesse you would involve Parents in another guilt of neglecting the meanes and cure of that disease which they were instrumental to the bringing their Children into or else that you are of the opinion of the Pelagian Hereticks who held no original sin at all in Infants but actual which they also contracted by Imitation of other wicked whereupon all the Antient and Orthodox Divines urged and pressed them with the Baptism of Infants and made it a foundation and proof of original sin in Infants like as I now go the other way and urge and presse original sin in Infants as a proof and plea or warrant as you call it for the Baptism of Infants as being the only outward ordinary way to begin their cure and Rogeneration more briefly and syllogistically thus take it as I recollect it If Baptism be commanded of God in the Gospel for the washing away the guilt and filth of original and birth sin then all Infants who are Partakers of these are commanded Baptism But Baptism is commanded of God in the Gospel for the washing away the guilt and filth of original and birth-sin Therefore Infants who are Partakers of these are commanded Baptism The first proposition is not questionable the light of Nature and Reason commandeth the use of meanes and medicines to the end and for maladies the sick need the Physician c. Come unto me all ye that are weary and heavy laden c. The second proposition is the matter of the Texts Rom. 6.3 and 4. and Acts 22.16 as hath been declared and so I have reasoned baptism of Infants into a command before I intended it Sirs I speak to you Parents are you willing your little pretty babes should be saved you should be very willing and desirous of it and the rather in that you have been means of conveighing into them a corrupt seed you should labour they might be born again of the incorruptible seed by the Word of God and the Seales thereof one whereof which is fit for them in their Infantile Estate is this Baptism I am speaking of and for If you would have them saved it must be either without or with Regeneration without Regeneration they cannot be saved For Flesh and Blood cannot inherit the Kingdom of God That which is born of the Flesh is Flesh a degenerate sinful corrupt thing neither can corruption iherit incorruption Therefore they must be saved with Regeneration for except a man be born again of Water and the Spirit John 3.3.6 He cannot enter into the Kingdom of God That which is born of the Spirit is Spirit a Regenerate sanctified and clean thing If so the Sirs bring forth your Infants and Babes unto the Laver and means of Regeneration present them to the Water of Baptism and wati and pray for the Spirit of God that it would move upon the face of the Waters as it did in the first Generation and so form a spiritual Light out of or in a natural darknesse That the Baptismal Water may be effectual by and through that Spirit of God as Waters of Jordan were
upon it for the strengthening themselves in their own opinion of Infant-Baptism Origen the Schollar and Disciple of Clemens Alexandrinus For the year 204. so forward a Schollar that at eighteen years of his age he set up a School and taught others in his fift Book to the Rom. 6. c. the Church hath received the Tradition from the Apostles even or also to little Children to give Baptism because in them as in all are the Genuine or ingenerated filths of sin the which ought to be washed with water and the Spirit Somewhat more of this there is in his eighth Book upon Levit 8. Homil. and upon Luke Homil. 14. Tertullain whom Cyprian read so diligently and esteemed so highly For the year 195. that in all matters of doubt he would have recourse to him saying Give me my Master meaning Tertullian in his Book of Baptism chap. 18. According to the Condition disposition and also age of every person the delaying of Baptism is more profitable especially in and about Infants for what necescessity is there if it be not so necessary to bring the suerties into danger of not performing their promise and whether this be meant of the Children which were not born of Christian Parents as some will or of the Children of believing Parents as others say its evident that Baptism was administred in all ages and he intimates the Custom and practice of the Church in his age to Baptize them even Children as well as others Though he seems not to be so well pleased with it and yet again the words import no other then that he denyed the Necessity onely of Baptism to them being out of danger of death not simply the Baptizing of them rather as in another place he doth imply they ought to be Baptized if there be danger or fear that afterwards they may not or cannot be Baptized in his Book of the Soul Chap. 39. and 40. where he saith that Infants of believing Parents or one Parent have such a Sanctity and that from the Privilege of their Birth not the discipline of their bringing up as gives them a Right to Baptism Therefore Tertullain calleth the Children of Believers The designees or destinates of Holiness or as elsewhere the Candidates of Holiness and so here is an evidence for that Birth Holiness or foederal Holiness of which I shall speak anon out of the 2 of Acts. Irenaeus 2 Book For the year 170. Chap. 39. He came to save all by himself I say all who are born again by him into God Infants and little ones and Children and yong men and old men c. The intention of the words is of Christ Jesus who as it followeth there went through every age to Infants made an Infant Sanctifying Infants to little ones made a little one sanctifying those of that age but you see there is an expression of Infants of whom he saith they are born again into or unto God that is Baptized for so Baptism is usually stiled by the Ancients especially the Greeks a Renascence or New Birth or Palingensy as might be shewed out of Athanasius and Basil who took it from the Apostolique manner also of speaking Tit. 3.5 as before I mentioned I can go no higher for Irenaeus was the Schollar and Disciple of Polycarpus and Polycarpus was the Schollar or Disciple of John the Evangelists and to you see I am come up to the very skirts and thresholds of the Apostolique Churches and Primitive Times with the Custom and Practice of Baptizing Infants Some go yet higher to Justin Martyr quaest resp ad orthod qu. For the year 130 90 60 56. and so to Clemens the Roman Bishop in his Apostolical constit lib. 6. cap. 15. and to Dyonisius Areopagita in his Eccles Hietarchy Ch. last And indeed there are pregnant places in them for Baptizing Infants if the Authors were Legitimate they are so good and sufficient against the Papists who own them and maintain them for true and Genuine but with us they are held to be suppositions and spurious and though many good and true things are in them as Infant-Baptism c. Yet they are not belonging to such venerable Names as those I have rchearsed and therefore not of that Antiquity with them and so impertinent to my purpose Onely one thing I must ad to satisfie the Reader why on this side of Augustine towards the Apostles I have mentioned no more of the Fathers and Doctors of the Church seeing there were many more or what were they discrepant in their opinion about the Baptism of Infants no sure the reason must needs be this they all lived long before Pelagius came out from the Brittish Seat and gathered to himself a Sect of Locusts which spread over the world and troubled the Churches with this matter for one they denying the Traduction of originall sin in Infants Therefore those Ancient Fathers of the Church having no occasion to intermeddle with any such matters about Infant-Baptism kept close onely to such controversies and questions as were on foot in their dayes save onely that Cyprian as I touched before was questioned hereabouts the silence of those Fathers that touched not upon it gives consent to the Practice as unquestioned by them but God would put words of it it to the mouthes of some of them to be witnesses unto posterity of the Antiquity of Infant-Baptism and the Churches Practice The like answer may be given why in those two General Councels the Nicene and the Constantinopolitan and some other Provincial ones which were before Augustine nothing is touched upon in their Canons about Baptism of Infants except that of Cyprian and his 66 Colleagues before mentioned because it was at a thing never in question amongst them never opposed by any and yet that was a very sruitful age of haeretical weeds springing up in those purer times witness the Munichees Arrians Donatists Macedonians Aaerians Eunomians Luciferians c. amongst all which not an Antipaedobaptist not any that so much as made scruple at it which sure some or other in malice or envy to the Church would have done if they could have found how to have shaken that as they did all other Foundations of Christinaity But after Augustines time when Pelagius arose Then the Councils came in against him thick and threefold as the Milevitane or Council of Carthage in the year 402. 418. Canon 11. and the Gerundense Council held in Spain 518. Can. 5. and the Bracarense Council the 2. 572. Can. 7. And so the Fathers and Doctors of the Church are ever and anon storming of Pelagius and his adhaerents And now Sir I know all this Labor is lost as to you who are and desire to be but a man of to day and for ever but for yesterday or Antiquity there you will leave even Christ and his Church and go no farther you are none of the old Martiald Souldiery but the New Modell'd Militia and yet you may remember how you began
contemners and despisers of his Sacraments fall heavily upon you and some or other curse of God pursue you so also that such water may be loathsom and noysom to you afterwards Remember Esau again For ye know how that afterwards when he would have inherited the blessing Heb. 12.16 17 he was rejected for he found no place of repentance though he sought it with tears Are they not ritghtly called Jacob's Supplanters one of the first planters of them was called Jacob and that rightly for they that take away your Birth-right Baptism will also take away your Blessing the Blessing of God in Covenant with you as well as with your Parents Yea remember one of the Separation by name Hodsou of the City of Glecester and by an Epithite called Hodson-peevish who since he was new baptised grew as light in the head as before he was light in heart the which I finde recorded by Master Thomas Wynell in print a Minister of Cranham nigh unto that City Yea remember the sad and desatrous ends of those first Ringleaders of re-baptising Muncer Cnipperdoling c. And now thirdly Can they charm sweetly and delightfully to any of you who have the root of bitterness in them from which I dehorted you and whose mouths are full of cursing and bitterness like as they have bitter envying and sirife in their hearts against your Mother-Church and your Baptism especially wherein ye were if regenerate at all born again of water and the Spirit My Brethren these things ought not to be doth a Fountain send forth at the same place or hole of heart or mouth sweet water and bitter Hear now ye Benjamites ye left-handed Protestants will the Son of Jesse Muncer who I mentioned but now give every one of you the Field Benefits 1 Sam. 22 2 5 and Vine-eard Priviledges of Christ and his Church by their new dipping of you and make you Captains of thousands and Captains of hundreds against your sins that they shall not raign or have dominion over your mortall bodies or immortall Soules that all of you have conspired against your Mother-Church and brethren Ministers O foolish Galathians who hath bewitched you that you should not obey the truth before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth crucified amongst you even in your Baptism Gal. 3.1 as the word and other Sacrament wherein you were sprinkled with the blood of Christ unto the washing away of sin being also crucified in the old man with him and buried with him by Baptism that the body of sin might be destroyed that thenceforth ye should not serve sin I mervaile that you are so soon removed away from your Baptism and your calling into the Grace of Christ and his Covenant of Grace unto another Baptism which is not another but there be some that trouble you and would pervert the Baptism of Christ Gal. 1.6 7 But though they or an Angell from Heaven preach any other Baptism unto you then that which we have preached and reached unto you let him be accursed and as I said before so say I now again if any man preach or reach any other Baptism unto you than that ye have received of us let him be accursed or let him shew where ever the Lord Blessed for ever at any time blessed or consecrated instituted or appointed a Baptism of Baptized ones Parents or Children or any other Baptism then once of Believing Parents and their Children once They say if a man put away his wife and she go from him and become another mans shall be return again to her shall not that Land be greatly polluted But thou hast played the Harlot with many Baptisms and many Dippers yet return again to me saith the Lord I say return again to the Lord Jer. 3.1 and to the Lords Baptism if thou hast put it away from thee and renounced it if thou be gone from him and with the strange woman hast forsaken the guide of thy youth yea Child-hood and forgotten the Covenant of thy God Prov. 2.17 and the Seal thereof art become another mans and betaken thy self to another Baptism for which the Land is also defiled as thy self I say return again to the Lord and his and thy first Baptism The Lord look upon thee and remember thy first Baptism and the words of the Covenant of Christ and go out from amongst them who by their Quaeres and intricate questioning of thee caused thee to deny thy first Baptism and therein thy Lord and Master go out and weep bitterly for the same Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen and repent and do thy first works Rev. 2.5 and leave not thy first Love hold fast that which thou hast already even thy first Baptism till Christ come I say Repent and be still as you were in your Infancy baptized every one of you in the Name of Jesus Christ and you shall have the Remission of your sins even of this sin of being Baptized again if so you have committed it For the promise is made to you and to your Children with many other words I would have testified and exhorted you saying save your self from this untoward Generation But that I hasten and will tell you to the contrary Look often back to your first Baptism in your Infancy and think not upon any other Baptism afterwards as to a Store-house of comfort in all time of your need if you be tempted by the devill and assaulted about your sins in your youth or old age think not now of ny new or second Baptism but recall thy first and old Baptism oppose it against him say and know that therein God hath promised and sealed unto thee the pardon of thy sins and the purchase of everlasting life by Christ If thou beest troubled with doubtings and weakness of Faith Fetch from thy first Baptism such a strengthening consideration and meditation for the doing of which to introduce another Baptism is but a Fetch that God hath given thee there an earnest and pledge of his loving kindness to thee in the water sprinkled upon thee representing the blood of Christ applyed to thee and so as when Thomas saw the Holes in Christs-side and the print of the nailes he strengthened his Faith against doubtings be not thou faithless but faithfull when thou reflectest upon thy Baptism and remembrest the pouring out of the blood of Christ for thee and the earnest thereof the pouring out of water upon thee If thou liest under any kind of Crosse or Calamity whatsoever have recourse to thy Baptism in which God hath promised to be thy God of which promise he will not fail thee nor canst thou be miserable having this promise yea if God be with thee who shall be against thee Thou doest often look upon the wills and Testaments of thy Father and Grandfather when you are in a doubt of hour Estate or in some trouble about it or in want to be resolved in all
matters thereabout do the same here look often back to thy Baptism wherein the will of thy heavenly Father which is this I will be thy God is delivered and sealed and thou wilt be well resolved comforted and cleered in all Estates and Conditions Onely look back also to and remember as often the obligation of Homage and stipulation of obedience wherewith thou hast bound thy self to God by thy suerties or prelenters of thee to Baptism now thou knowest and understandest it thou must stand to it nd make it good thy part of the Indentures perform the Order of Baptism on thy side which is to turn to God and believe in Christ and be continually renewing of thy Faith and repentance and then there shall be no need of any second Baptism or washing in water having the benefit and efficacy of and from the same Baptism at first For this also I will tell thee for thy farther comfort that the benefit and efficacy of Baptism extendeth it self to all actual sins like as originall to the whole course of the life of man whensovever he shall believe and repent and is not to be restrained to the time of the Birth and Infancy so after the administration of it Baptism hath the same force it hath before or in the time of its administring for Baptism is of force so long as the Covenant is of force and that is everlasting Esay 54.10 Hos 2.19 The Papists indeed will tell you as I have mentioned already that your Baptism will serve you only for Remission of sins done before it meaning your originall sin and so call your Baptism the first Table for Refuge as from it and for sins done after Baptism you must have their Sacrament of Pennance or Repentance which they call a second Table for Refuge like as the Anabaptists tell you you must have their Sacrament of Confession as I may call their second Baptism which they Minister upon Confession of Faith But I tell you both are needless and superfluous for your one first single Baptism supplyeth all you need no New Sacraments for the matter as whose force and efficacy though the rite and Ceremony were gone in an instant doth extend it self to your whole life time and to all sins to be a seal unto you of the Remission of all original and actual past and to come so you will still have recourse unto it and make application of the grace thereof offered and sealed to you on Gods part For I do not mean nor must you think that the bare and empty Review or Remembrance of your Baptism that such an outward Act was done will be unto you at all times a Remission of your sins but it must be an effectual application of the blood of Christ which is the virtue and power of it that will do it and this may be and is done in the confession of your sins and the profession so your faith I may rather speak more properly than they do and say that your Baptism is not so only the first Table for Refuge after Shipwrack and Repentance the second but that Baptism is the first and one long drawing Table that may and must be drawn out at length into the Two Leaves of it namely into and unto Repentance of sin and confession of Faith at or upon which rightly used and applyed you and all true believers and penitent sinners may sit down and find plenty and provision of grace and mercy or which not so much as a Table or Plank but as the Ark and Ship it self will save you as Saint Peter saith So then let the effects and fruits of your first Baptism be acted and exercised by you aad let the force and efficacy thereof be seen in the reformation of your whole life for Baptism is a seal of a dying to sin and a rising unto Newness of Life Rom. 6.4 as well as a Seal of the Remission of sin Mark 1.4 and then you shall need no second Baptism and if not your first will be frustrated and yet you can have no second and I may say unto you Christians ye stiffnecked and unbaptized in heart and eares as Stephen doth the Jewes ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart ears when as you do not express the force and vertue of your first Baptism as they did not of their first Circumcision in the renovation and reformation of your hearts and eares i.e. life and actions Therefore when the Jews fell away from God at any time and were called to Confession of sin or profession of Faith the Prophets did not propound unto them a new or second Circumcision as if the former were voyded or vacated but onely mind them of their first and onely Circumcision and their Obligation in their Infancy bidding them to Circumcise the fore-skin of their hearts and to practice the inward Circumcision in conversion to God the spiritual and inward part of that Sacrament And so the Apostles used to call them that had sinned after Baptism as the Galathians by name who had fallen from the Grace of the Gospel to confession of sin and repentance to believe in Christ telling them of their Baptism into Christ so bringing and reducing them to that foretaken by them and the order set down there which is already mentioned nor do we read either in Prophet or Apostle of any other new order required afterwards of the Baptizing them again but only a renewing of their Faith and Repentance the Order and Obligation of their first and once Baptism by the Ministry of the word and that other Sacrament the Supper of the Lord. In a word learn now to practice thy Baptism the inward part of it to which appertains Repentance and Faith and so look not only back to it but into it an find out there thy ingagement and restipulation and perform that now that thou art come to knowledge thereof and walk before God in true obedience and in good resistance and abrenuntiation of the Devill and all his works For I would not such a looking back to thy Baptism as may put a vain confidence in the cutward element received by thee such a Respect or Contemplation of Baptism as to trust in the Elements is a misapplication of it through corruption and may well indeed occasion sin and encourage thee to a certain libertinisin licentiousnest in life there are some who being reproved for their swearing drunkenness and whordom take Sanctuary at their Baptism as if it assured men wilfully trading in sin of the remission of it without Repentance and Faith but rest not thou in the outward Letter or Element of the water but study the Spirit and walk in the Holiness of the same Repent of every breach of Covenant and this Repentance will be as a second plank or board after such Shipwrack to carry thee to the Haven of Happiness like as thy Baptism was a first step and stair of thy entrance into the visible Church and set
Gentiles that are in Covenant with God and enjoy the Ordinances of his grace and mercy do also by vertue of Gods Promise I will be thy God and the God of thy seed convey to their issue and posterity a state and privilege and so rather it is the joynt Covenant made by God with both together the Parent and his issue and posterity to be reputed of a holy and clean society and Congregation before God from the other Pagan and heathenish world and so the child or children born of such Parents in Covenant to be truly holy like as the Parent because of the Covenant Not that insants have any real personal qualitative holiness in them which is and must be in all true believers whither Parents or children to make them acceptable to God as to justification and Salvation whom I confess though born within the Church and of believing Parents to be born in sin naturally and be unclean children of wrath by nature as well as others the children of Pagans without the Church But I say they have a federal and parental so it may be called by a savory mouth and relative or imputative holiness put upon them by the Covenant of God and brought forth or executed on them by or at their birth of believing Parents which is sufficient and enough to make them passe in the eyes of God and in the face of the visible Church for clean and holy or if not their professions of the faith of Christ for you will not deny them to be professors of Christ and members of the Church in part and in kinde at leastwise by the mouth of their Sureties presenting them and speaking for them this will bear them out to be holy likewise And what if I should tell you in your ear that Christian infants in Covenant with God are holy too by an inward holiness also are not all inward sanctifying graces effects of Gods Covenant and who knoweth when God as where he effects them you perhaps would stop that ear cry out Then grace which onely maketh holy cometh successively and is derived by nature and Parents shall be the authors and conveighers of grace and holiness to their children No such matter Sir For the children are primitively holy with the Parents by the Covenant as co-partners and confederates with them therein I will be thy God and the God of thy seed not derivatively holy from the Parents as solely or first partners and prefederates without these Christian Parents and children are both joynt confederates I say and do both draw and derive together their holiness as other privileges from the Covenant and Tenour of grace therein and not successively from one another children from Parents derivatively as you fondly fansie to your self and erroniously imagine The which truth may also serve much to clear off those cloudy difficulties so much pressed by the Anabaptistical party from the Jesuitical side about infants being Baptized sanctified saved by the faith of their Parents as they use to blate and bâ—â—e abroad You like enough before you will believe any holiness in them would have them shew some such thing either in words before they can speak and whilest they are infants that is nonfants or indeed before they have any idoneity of instruments and ability to act Have patience a while and you may hear them speak the words and see them do some acts of holiness What! are you so sensual all for sense and so altogether lead by sense that nothing but a sensative or sensible manifestation of holiness in children will be believed by you I had thought you had walked by faith and not by sight you believe a holiness in other things in Faith in the Word in the Sacraments in the Church of God and in all things which the holy Scriptures the oracles of holiness have pronounced holy though you have not a visible and sensible demonstration of holiness in them you walk by faith there and not by fight and why cannot you believe a holiness in children of Christian Parents in Covernant with God though they shew forth no sensible effects of such holiness seeing also the same holy Scripture doth call them holy and not unclean and so supplying their defect of speech and action giveth you what you ask even a sensible manifestation of their holiness and speaks them holy unto your ears not declares them holy to your eyes so you may now walk by sight and hear say not by faith and hope limping and halting therein for except you shall see in their hands and tongues the prints of holiness in works and words and perhaps thrust your fingers into their fides to feel the holiness of their hearts too in affections and thoughts you will not believe What and if our Saviour Christ should now as once take one of our little children in Covenant with him and set it before you and say whosoever humbleth himself as a little child the same is greatest in the Kingdom of Heaven for of such is the Kingdom of Heaven would it not be strange for you to tell him you see no such yet you hear of such humility lowliness meakness mildness innocency in children and is it not a like to tell him you see no such holiness here when you hear of it from the mouth of Christ his and this Apostle Paul here saying They are holy But that I have said it before and already I would say that even children shew themselves more bumble lowly meek mild and innocent and so more holy than a great many of your grown Professors and grand Pretenders unto holiness and all those graces let their holiness and other graces rest but a while as seed hidden up in their hearts or wrapped up in Gods Covenant with them and see if afterwards they do not shew it and their holiness break not forth as the light at noon day that was within the cloud or as the seed in harvest that was within the clod and in the mean time shew me thy faith by thy works and thy holiness by thy words and learn to speak better of childrens holiness and to do better with children for their holiness even so well as to let them be Baptized But besides this in hand there are two eminent Texts that hold out infants of Christians their holiness by Covenant the one is Rom. 11.16 If the first fruit be holy the lump also is holy and if the root be holy so are the branches I know the stream of our Divine Advocates for Infant-Baptism run altogether and out of this Text upon a derivative holiness from the Parents or Ancestors to their children which notwithstanding they call and make a federal holiness I am not willing in my old and infirm daies to strive or swim against a stream onely I will be bold to venture and wade so far as to hint again and mention unto those akilful steersmen now especially that the waters of strife about Infant-Baptism are risen high
of their first baptism that as many of them as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ Galat. 3.27 1 Cor. 6.11 such were some of you but ye are washed but ye are sanctified c. see also Rom. 6.3 c. The Husband who hath kept the marriage contract inviloable and undefiled in his part and is willing to receive into bed and board a fornicating wife requires no new marriage or the solemnities thereof again but her humiliation onely and submission with promise of better carriage after God who keepeth Covenant for ever fast and indissoluble on his part is also ever ready to admit into his Grace and Favor all who have gone a whoring from him onely upon their repentance and sorrow with resolves of reformation for time to come and expects no new solemn Re-baptizings and Re-dippings into the Covenant but I have spoken somewhat of this in the Scribe instructed I shall add to this point but a few words of the good old Fathers of the Church and shall shew by them that this your second baptism or rebaptizing was is none of their good old way Some of them built their judgements against Rebaptization upon those Texts Rom. 6.9 Heb. 9.28 wherein it s said Christ died once for all but once offered for sin Hence Basil de Spirit usancto Cap. 15. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I English it for your sake We know there is but one saving Baptism for that there is but one Death for the world and one Resurrection from the dead of which Baptism is the Figure Damasc lib. 4. Orthod sid Cap. 10. hath almost the same words as to the one Death Augustine also de vera falsa poen Cap. 3. if that be his Book hath the same also Semel Christus crucifixus est una morte suâ nos omnes redemit quod videns Ecclesia intellexit non iterandum esse Baptisma Let the English before serve for this also Yea Damascen calleth the Reiteration of Baptisin rightly collated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as if rebaptization were a kind of Recrucifixion of Christ others of them concluded against rebaptization from John 13.10 He that is washed needeth not save to wash his feet but is clean every whit Thus Augustine lib. 11. de Baptismo contra Donat. cap. 14. Quid sit perniciosius non baptizari an rebaptizari judicare difficile est Invenio de utraque Domini sententiam nam Petro dixit qui lotus est non habet necessitatem iterum lavandi Nicodemo nisi quis renatus fuerit ex aquâ Spiritu non intrabit in regnum coelorum It is hard to judge whether of the two is more pernicious not to be baptized at all or to be again baptized I finde the Lords sayings of both for he said to Peter He that is washed needeth not save to wash his feet but is clean every whit And to Nicodemus unless a man be born of water and of the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdom of heaven John 3.5 It seems St. Austin could not well tell or would not which of the two are the worst an Abaptist or an Anabaptist Ambrose also lib. de iis qui initiantur myst cap. 6. and Fulgentius de Fide ad Petrum cap. 36. agree to the same interpretation of and argumentation out of that place of John against Rebaptization especially Fulgentius whose words are Ideò Baptisma et si ab Haeretieis fuerit administratum modò in nomine Patris Filii Spiritus sancti fuerit factum venerabiliter agnoscendum ab hoc nullatenus iterandum esse juxta dictum Christi semel lot us non indiget nisi ut pedes lavet I shall english this the rather to you because it confirms a passage of mine before which perhaps seemed strange if not false to you Therfore Baptism although it were administred of Hereticks as long as it was done in the name of the Father Son and holy Spirit is venerably to be acknowledged and even for this not to be repeated or reiterated according to the saying of Christ once washed hath no need save to wash his feet Others of them concluded against Rebaptizing from Ephes 4.5 One Lord one Faith one Baptism Thus Leo Papa cited by Gratian decret de censec dist 4. Canon non licet And so Thom. Aquinas in 4. Sent. Distinct 3. I shall onely cite what the learned Hugo saith Hac authoritate universi utuntur All the Ancients make use of this Text and Authority against second or double Baptism quod enim unum est geminari non potest that which is but one cannot be doubled and iterated whether a man be baptized of a Catholique or of a Heretick as he also addeth but no more of this because there is somewhat of this unity of Baptism in my Instruction or a Scribe I know there be some of our Divines do not allow of these ancient Deductions and Argumentations from those Texts cited by them which I believe they would have made good and firm if they had been questioned in their times and now others might do the same in their behalf But this in present is onely my business to shew their Judgements not to maintain all their Arguments by which they grounded them I say to shew what their judgements about this your Redipping and Rebaptizing namely that they are quite against it and would not own it as any of their good old wayes its evident this was their strong and unanimons judgement and therefore the and very probably confirmed it from the Scripture Dictates mentioned and produced above The third Catechistic I Quoere aebout the maner of this Dipping Quaere 3. What warrant or command or example have you from the sacred Scriptures or the succeeding Primitive Antiquity for your dipping of persons in their clothes and vestments at your baptizing them so your two Sisters stripping themselves in a chamber and putting on other and others clothes that so they might have their own dry against they came to the House again from the Pond went into the Pond in their clothes and there were dipped in their body and clothes as you relate to me and as you or others instructed them All this speaketh novelty and nothing else but a new business unheard in Scripture unseen in Antiquity and the Ancient Churches For do your think that thd Eunuch or Lydia were thus and in this maner baptized of Philip and Paul in the waters clothed and with their garments upon them and that to this purpose they went aside in private to shift themfelves of the suits they had on and to put on others that they might have dry clothes ready against they came out of the water with their wet ones say not so no not in your thought for the Scripture saith no such matter no nor suggesteth any such thing to thought This being then silent here succeeding Antiquity must be heard what they say and you cannot refuse to do so seeing in your
kept and maintained in these Northern parts of the world where the Churches of God cannot practise or use it I speak of dipping and immerging with safety to our Infants healths and lives But to the other part of the objection or doubt I answer and that from Antiquity First I gave you but even now four several Testimonies out of four Ancient Fathers and Writers of the Church how in their times they poured water upon the heads of those who were baptized so I gave you good probabilities and more then so of John the Baptists manner of baptizing of Christ and Christs Apostles most of them if not all and the great multitudes that resorted to his baptism by pouring water upon their heads were not all those as amply and sufficiently baptized as those who had their whole bodies dipped and immerged under water and were they not as fully partakers of all the benefits and effects of Baptism In the Ark were the eight souls the Epilogue of the World and the Epitome of the Church saved by water The like figure whereunto even baptism doth now also save us 1 Pet. 3.20 21. Now then as the Ark being washed with water but in a part of it whether that which was immerged under the water or that which was aspersed with the rain that fell saved the Church then so baptism doth the Church now though but a part of the body as the head or face or fore-head be either immerged and dipped or aspersed and sprinkled with the water in baptism And good reason for it because by and from the Divine Institution the Baptismal-water is blessed sanctified and impowred of God and his grace to be the ablution and washing of the whole man body and soul though it be applied in the out ward Element but to a part onely of the body and so received but of a part it being so in this mystical as it is in some physical soveraign Doses and Receipts which being taken onely at the mouth and into the stomach diffuseth its healing vigour and vertue unto the whole body though not here in baptism by any natural and self-operation in this but a gracious and the spirits dispensation so then though the water which in baptism is poured onely upon the fore-head or face doth reach to or flow down to all the whole body in the external liqucur to wash and wet it yet in the internal vertue and efficacy which the same hath from the Institution and Benediction of God it extendeth to a total ablution of the party baptized so that it goeth over all body and soul too even to an internal ablution of the soul chiefly as being principal in sin and all this still by the force and vertue of the Divine Ordination of the water hereunto See it also from the Analogy that Baptism hath with Circumcision I know you are never willing to hear of that Circumcision but you shall hear of that whether willing or not In Circumcision there was but one part of the flesh the fore-skin was touched and cut off with the Knife yet it was and is so called the putting away the filth of the flesh the whole body and soul for that the vertue and efficacy of that which was done but to a part redounded also by Gods appointment to the whole even to the Circumcision in heart and ears and lips as the Scripture every where speaketh Now in Christ Jesus also we are circumcised with the Circumcision made without hands in puting off the body of the sins of the flesh Coll. 2 11. that is we are baptized with the baptism of Christ to the washing away the sins of the body and soul and therefore though but some one part and the fittest part the head or fore-head or face be onely externally sprinkled washed with the water thereof yet the baptism is valid and effectual to the ablution internally of the soul also and all the body also virtually some way according to his ordination Lastly I think not the meaner of our Baptism by reason of our but handful of water and our but sprinkling or pouring on of it upon the face and fore-head or the better of yours by reason of your Pond-full of water and your immerging and dipping of the whole body therein No Ordinance of God is to be esteemed more or lesse effectual for either the more or the lesse of the Instrument or Element for God usually and more usually saveth with a few then many 1 Sam. 14 6. with little then with great that so all power might be known to be of him so all glory might be to him Rom. 11.36 as who is the God of the Valleys as well as of the Mountains 1 Kings 20.28 This is true especially in mystical and spiritual Ordinances and proceedings which have his Inslitution and Benediction upon them as I have shewed in Circumcision and may do the like in the Lords Supper where a smal portion of bread and a little pittance of wine a morsel of the one and a spoonful of the other are as sâ—gniâ—cant as effectual to a spiritual and internal refection of the Communicant as if a whole loaf of the one and a full Cup of the other should be given and taken So also in baptism a few drops of water or a little handfull of it sprinkled and poured on the face or forehead of an Infant or other is as representing of and as working to a spiritual and internal ablution of the baptized as if a whole pailfull of water should be poured on or the whole body of the Infant dipped and immerged into a River full of water after the custome of the Eastern Churches I will onely add to this point a Testimony or two of Antiquity Chrysostom writing in his 6 Homil. upon the 2 Chapter of the Coloss and those words in the 11 Verse In whom ye are circumcised with the Circumcision made without hands in putting off the sins of the body c. buried also with him in Baptism He hath these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I shall not stand to English all the effect of all is this that both in Circumcision and Baptism though the hand in the one doth but cut off a part of the flesh as the fore-skin with a small knife and in the other pour on a little water but upon some part of the body as the fore-head the whole body of sin may be and in the Elect is cut off put off in the Apostles phrase and washed away in both Sacraments by a spiritual operation of Christ So also for the other Sacraent the Lords Supper it being one of the Popish evasions for their not giving the wine unto the people by reason of the great quantity of wine would be spent upon the numerous multitudes of them that would then the rather come and drink great draughts which should not have been thought upon here by them seeing at other ordinary seasts and banquets they stand not upon such
and effects thereof to comfort and support you upon your faith and repentance and all this for impotent element and beggarly rudiment as the Apostle speaketh Col. 2.22 for I may add your Affirmative of Dip again to their Negatives Touch not taste not which all are to perish with using ordinances after the commandments of men having indeed a shew of wisdom in Will-worship and Humility and neglecting of the body not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh or sanctifying either flesh or spirit or which is neither seal of any Covenant by Gods institution neither leaves any benefit behinde it in the present act nor carrieth any good before it to the future life as you will see when the scales fall off from your eyes which now hang upon them In this you did but run along with the Papists if you did not out-run them they teach that Baptism of Infants taketh away all sin that goeth before it as Original sin but for sins commited after as actual ones they must be taken away by their devised Sacrament of Penance or Repentance And your masters have taught and told you that they must be taken away and that after Repentance hath taken them away by their forged Sacrament of Re-dipping and so both of you do though in several wayes destroy the true nature and use of Baptism which is the Laver for all sins past present and to come to be washed in and away as to the guilt and filth of them True that Repentance is also another good way to take off sins committed and to procure the remission of them according to Gods Promise and Covenant but it must not thrust out Baptism to bring in it self to be a Sacrament of Pennance as the Papists would have it nor lay aside your Infant-baptism to carry you out to a Man-dippism as the Anabaptists have served you For that your Infant-baptism being the Seal of the eternal Covenant is ever effectual and of force and upon the repentance of your actual sins at any time whatsoever will doth comfortably assure and seal unto both the pardon and remission of them so that there will need no new Sacrament to be set up by them of penance nor any second dipping to be practised by you as a Sacrament of profession as I may call it Nay more Repentance Faith c. Conversion Sanctification are all but as the fruits and effects of the Covenant of Grace offered and sealed to on Gods part by his Spirit of Grace and also but the parts and conditions of the same Covenant of Grace entered into and sealed to on your part to do and perform by the operation of the same Spirit in the use of the means of Grace so that therefore those and all other such like do continue and demonstrate both to Papists and Anabaptists the efficacy of the first Infant-baptism which runneth along and even liveth in them And Sir as to your self take it from me and be no longer mistaken from those who make but merchandice of your soul as they do of the Word Whatsoever things are true in you to use the words of St. Paul Phil. 4.8 Whatsoever things are honest in you whatsoever things are just in you whatsoever things are pure in you whatsoever things are lovely in you whatsoever things are of good report in you if there be any vertue in you and if there be any Grace of God appearing in you plucking you out from your wicked wayes unto the knowledge of the Truth they sprang all and are derived to you from that first Covenant of Grace with your believing Parents and your self I will be thy God and the God of thy seed and from the initial Seal of that Covenant your Baptism which was imprinted upon you in your Infancy and which still remaineth in the force and efficacy thereof if you will mind it and embrace it and practise it and none of all these Goods or Graces have been wrought in you or communicated to you by the Spirit of God in or by your late dipping as being none of the Signes or Seals of Grace appointed of God Do men gather Grapes of thorns or Figs of thistles Mat. 7.16 you are not nor will be any whit the better thereby as to the salvation of your soul and I perceive you have been somewhat worse thereby as to the health of your Body The which I somewhat wonder at seeing your two Sisters who were dipped at your House said as I am rightly informed in your chamber as they were shifting off their wet clothes and putting on dry The one of them I have been these many years in a Consumption and now by this I finde my self even cured now yea and I indeed Sister replyed the other do find and feel much comfort in this Why Sir how came this about that you went farther and fared worse had it not been better for you to have been dipped in your own Pond at home then to ride out and be dipped in a strange Pond abroad Are not Adgors and Kettring's Ponds of Much-leighes better then all the waters of either of the Lavers 2 Kings 5.12 might you not have washed in those and have been clean sure your own Pond and water would as well have cured you of a Consumption and comforted your heart as it it did your two Sisters But the reason was The vertue and operation of Kettrings waters was not then known when you were to be dipt as now they are and are famous even as the Laver waters whither you went and were dipt onely now there is this difference The Laver Pond and Waters are for the dipping of the Brothers and they do sometimes well and sometimes ill upon it witness your self but Kettring Pond and waters are for the dipping of the Sisters and they do alwayes well upon it and are cured of Consumptions and cheered up with comfort after which may redound to your credit and glory and the reputation of your waters Nay this hath fallen out very happily to your profit and advantage also and may be very helpful to the paying of your Rent more then either the returns of your Crop or the Retail of your Shop if you would know how I shall tell you First make it to be more publickly known abroad in this County and Secondly give notice hereof to Mercurius Politicus to Print it in his weekly Intelligences to be communicated to all other Counties and the whole Common-wealth that at Kettring's House in Much-leighes of Essex there is a Pond wherein upon once dipping two Sisters have been instantly the one cured of a Consumption the other much filledwith Comfort And you will have out of hand all the sorrowful souls and Consumptious bodies in the Nation at leastwise this County come flocking to your House as the blinde and the halt did to the Pool of Bethesda Joh. 5.2 3 4. and then I hope you know how to deal with them and to make your gain of your Pond