193. Now because Priests without knowledge and Confession of sinnes can not discerne or iudge when or what Sinnes are to be remitted or retayned It is further likewise confessed that in the Primitiue Church Confession auricular and particular of sinnes to the Priest was taught and practised And though (10) Contra Duraeum l. 7. p. 490. D. Whitaker doth affirme that Innocentius the Third was the first that instituted Auricular Confession for necessarie yet S. Leo who liued almost eight hundred yeares before this Innocentius is charged with like Innouation by M. Symonides (11) Vpon the Reuel p. 57. saying Leo the First first brought-in Auricular Confession And then presently after he citeth S. Leo his owne words for Auricular Confession And wheras long before Innocentius the Iacobites were condemned for affirming that we are to confesse our sinnes to God only And that Confession of Sinnes to a Priest is not needful this is acknowledged by the Protestant (12) p. 126. Authour of Catholick Traditions But to clear also S. Leo of al Nouellisme in this hehalf It is confessed by the Centurists (13) Cent. 4. col 425. And see col 426. that euen in the time of Constantin who liued aboue One hundred yeares before S. Leo that the Christians as then To this end had a Priest c. appoynted to whom those coming who had sinned should confesse the sinnes they had committed c. And the Priest vpon that condition absolued those who Confessed that they should desire from him Pennance for their Sinnes Yea they arise higher and plainly confesse (14) Cent. 3. c. 6. col â—27 that in the times of Cyprian Tertulian priuat Confession of thoughts and lesser sinnes was vsed and thought necessarie and their words are these Absolution from sinnes was so giuen that those who did Pennance first confessed their sinnes For so doth Tertulian greatly vrge Confession in his book of Pennance and that priuat Confession was vsual wherein they confessed their crimes as also their wicked thoughts it appeareth by some places of Cyprian as in the Fift Sermon de Lapsis third book of Epistles ep 14. 16. where he plainly sayth Euen for lesser sinnes which are not committed directly against God it is needful to go to Confession and this he commandeth to be done often l. 1. ep 3. c. Thus far the Centurists Confession being made by the Penitent to the Priest the Centurists (15) Cent. 3. col 127 81. 38. 49. 82. And see Caluin Instit l. 4. c. 12. §. 8. And Conc. Laodicenum Can. 2. apud Osiand ceÌ„t 4 p 386. further confesse that Pennance or Satisfaction was enioyned according to the offence And that the Priest (16) Cent. 4. col 425. 426. And see col 491. 834. 868. did absolue those who confessed their sinnes vpon that condition that they would demand punishment for the same And D. Whitaker (17) Cont. Camp rat 5. p. 78. acknowledgeth that Cyprian Tertulian thought by such their external discipline of life to pay the paynes due for sinnes and to satisfy Gods Iustice And that Not Cyprian only but almost al the most Holie Fathers of that time were in that errour So likewise Melancthon (18) In his Libelli aliquot fol. 10. 11. 16. disliketh that Cyprian vrgeth Canonical Pennance c. and confirmeth the opinion as though they were necessarie that for them sinnes are forgiuen c. In like sort the whole Nycene Councel ouercome with the consent of the multitude and time approued the Canons of Pennance And for the same doctrine he reproueth the (19) Ibid. fol. 19. 28. Carthage Councel S. Chrysostome Chemnitius (20) Exam. part 4. p. 68. chargeth the Fathers in general saying I am not ignorant that the Old Fathers do sometimes ouer largely and with words ouer loftie command that Canonical discipline As that Tertulian sayth by these Satisfactions sinnes are purged Cyprian sayth by them sinnes are redeemed washed cured Ambrose by them the paynes of Hel are recompensed Augustin God by them is pacifyed for sinnes past And such like Sayings there are which with true Faith neither can nor ought to be taken as they sound And Hamelmanus auoucheth that Cyprian seemeth fouly to haue erred concerning Satisfaction Yea sayth Caluin (22) Pref. Inst ad Reg. Galliae And see Inst l. 3. c. 4. §. 38. Those things which euerie foot occurre in the works of the Old Writers or Fathers touching Satisfaction moue me but litle (21) De Tradit l. 2. c. 7. col 97. for I see that diuers of them I wil say simply as it is almost al whose works are extant either haue erred in this matter or haue spoken ouer crabbedly hardly And agayne (23) Inst l. 3 4 c. 12. §. 8. The immoderate Austeritie of the ancient Fathers can no wayes be excused it differed wholy from the Commandment of our Lord was verie dangerous here their wisdome was to be required As also (24) Inst l. 3 c 3. §. 16. The ancient Writers exceeded measure with â—mmoderat prayses they commended that corporal Discipline They were more seuere in exacting chastisements then Ecclesiastical lenitie doth permit And the Centurists speaking of the Third Age affirme that (25) Cent. 3. p. 81. Most of the Doctours of this Age do wonderfully depraue the doctrine of Pennance yea they spare not to say of the Age next to the Apostles that (26) Cent. 2. p. 62. Euen then this part of Doctrine concerning Pennance began to be weakned Now as concerning Indulgences or Pardons of temporal punishment It is confessed by M. Symonides (27) Vpon the Reuel p. 84. that S. Gregorie remitted Canonical Penance promised clean remission of sinnes to such as frequented Churches on set dayes M. Bale (28) In Act. Rom. Pontif. p. 46 47. affirmeth that Gregorie confirmed by Indulgences Pilgrimages to Images for the deuotion of the people And that He was a defender of Pardons yet not a seller As also that He first granted Pardons for set dayes and to such as visited Churches In like manner Pantaleon (29) In Chr. p. 48. auoucheth of him that He first granted pardon of sinnes to the people visiting Churches vpon set dayes In Decret in 3. psal Paenit (30) In his Euseb Capt. published by Pâ—zelius vnder the Title of Act. 1. diei de Indulgentijs fol. 48. Hieronymus Marius thinketh that Gregorie the First and Boniface the Eigth were the chief authours of Pardons Cyprian (31) In his Treatise of the liues of Popes Engl. p. 32. also Valera confesseth of S. Grogorie that he granted Pardons but sold them not And D. Humfrey (32) In Iesuit part 2. rat 5. p 5. 627. repeating sundrie Catholick poynts of Faith taught and brought into England by S. Gregorie S. Austin inferreth from them in these words From al which what els is intended but that Pardons Monachisme Papistrie
others do report And that The manner was to send it by the Deacons to them that by sicknes or other necessarie impediment were forced to be absent to strangers Yea for this purpose they did in such places where they communicated not euerie day reserue some part of the sanctifyed Elements to be sent to the Sick such as were in danger of death Yea as then was vsual the Pixe for the reseruing or carrying therof in so much that (59) Assert Theol. part 2 sec 47. Marbachius confesseth that S. Basile reserued the Eucharist in a golden Doue And wheras D. Harding obiecteth for the Pixe the plaine testimonies of Symmachus Gregorius Romanus Gregorius Turonensis Theodorus the same are acknowledged by M. Iewel (60) In his Reply Art 9 p. 420. Fulk against Staplet p. 150 151. D. Fulk Lastly the Roman Church doth so directly follow the Doctrine and practise of the Primitiue Church in this so waightie a matter of the Eucharist as that she obserueth the external forme or figure therof vsed in the ancient Church D. Bilson (61) In his true Differ p. 4. p. 566. acknowledgeth from S. Epiphanius in Ancorato that the Eucharist was round in figure And M. Carthwright (62) In Whytguift Def. p. 593 And see Proet de Sacram p 287. 281. confesseth that it was a round wafer-cake brought in by Pope Alexander which Pope liued as Osiander (63) Cent. 2. p 10. Whitgift in his Def. p. 594. and D. Whiteguift confesse Anno Christ 111. which is now aboue 500. yeares Hospinian (64) Hist Sacram. l. 4. p. 370. auoucheth that It can not certainly be knowne when Christians first began either at home or in the Churcheâ— to prepare of floure or bread litle round Hostes morcels like peeces of siluer c. Epiphanius maketh mention of round bread in the Supper c. The ancient Iew s also did most plainly foretel the Real presence of Christs Bodie in the Eucharist and the Sacrifice therof for wheras Duraeus vrgeth from Galatinus the Hebrewes most plaine and plentiful Sayings iâ— behalf therof D. Whitaker answering thereto neither confesseth nor yet denyeth but only shufleth them off saying (65) Cont. Dur. l. 9. p. â—18 In this matter we do not desire thy Peter Galatin neither do we need those testimonies of the Hebrewes so not denying but rather supposing the truth of the forsayd testimonies euidently foreshewing and affirming the Real presence and Sacrifice of Christs blessed Bodie in the Sacrament And thus we see the Fathers and Doctours of the Primitiue Church to haue symbolized with vs Catholicks in the doctrine of the Eucharist teaching expresly First Transubstantiation itself Secondly and prescribing a most diligent care that no part therof do fal vpon the ground Thirdly yea and adoring it with special reuerence Fourthly and in that regard vsing Eleuation therof at Masse time as we stil continue Fiftly for which case they receaue fasting Sixtly the Marryed Laytie also forbearing the Companie of their wiues for some tyme before Receiuing Seauenthly Besides they not only kept and reserued the same for the sick and other such necessities But also vsed the verie forme figure of a round wafer-Cake obserued at this day Now the Fathers produced and reproued by Protestant Writers for the forsayd poynts are S. Gregorie Chrysostom Eusebius Emissenus Cyril Ambrose Hilarie Austine Nazianzene Basile Hierom Siricius Innocentius Calixtus Vrbanus Symmachus Gregorius Turonensis Epiphanius Cyprian Origen Tertulian Ignatius the Fathers in general The Protestants citing and confessing the foresayd Fathers are the Centurists Musculus Oecolampadius Vadian Anthonie de Adamo Peter Martyr Caluin Melancthon Bucer Osiander Vrsinus Hamelmanus Adamus Francisci Hâ—spinian Bucanus Chemnitius Chytreus Crispinus Marbachius Pelargus Altkircherus Zepperus Humfrey Whitaker Fulk Parker Parkins Carthwright Willet Iewel Field and Beard And now I appeale to al indifferent Readers whether Protestants themselues haue not sufficiently confessed that by the Sentence or Doome of the Senate of Antiquitie D. Morton and his Brethren are chargeable with Heresie as also the Romanists acquitted of Idolatrie Protestants confesse that the Primitiue Church of Christ beleeued taught and practised the Sacrifice of the Masse as also that it is a Sacrifice according to the order of Melchisedech and truly Propitiary for the liuing and the dead CHAPTER IX IT is the general (1) Conâ— Trident. sess 22. c. 9. and certaine Decree of the Catholick Church that Christ our Sauiour at his last Supper instituted a true and proper Sacrifice of his owne Bodie Bloud and that he gaue power and authoritie to his Apostles and to Priests their Successours to offer the same aswel for the Liuing as the Dead Protestants (2) Luth. de Capt Babyl c. de Eucha Chemnit Exam part 2. Caluin Instit l. 4. c. 18. §. 1. 2 deny al true proper and external Sacrifice to be ordained by Christ or to be vsed in the time of the Ghospel but only the spiritual Sacrifices of Prayse thankes-giuing and the like Now because D. Morton wisheth that (3) Prot. Appeale l. 2. p. 169. These two questions whether the Eucharist be a true essential Sacrifice whether it be properly Propitiatorie auaylable in itself for remission of Sinnes or no might be decided amongst other meanes by the verdict of ancient Fathers I wil therfore ioyne with him therein and that only from the verdict giuen by his owne Brethren S. Gregorie the Great is much reproued by manie Protestant Writers for his Doctrine and practise of the Sacrifice of the Masse M. Beacon (4) The Reliques of Rome p 344 affirmeth that the Masse was fully finished by Pope Gregory the first about Anno Domini 600. Melancthon (5) l. 4 Chr. in Henri i. 4 fol. 186. 187 confesseth that He allowed by publick Authoritie the Sacrifice of Christs Bodie Bloud not only for the liuing but also for the dead D. Humfrey (6) In Iesuit part 2. rat 5 p. 5 627. acknowledgeth that S. Gregorie S. Austin brought into England the Archbishops Palle for Solemne Masses Carion (7) Chr. l 4. p 567. 568. auoucheth that Gregorie c. approued the oblation of the Bodie Bloud for the dead M. Bale (8) Cent. 1. p. 68. granteth that Gregorie ordered the verie Ceremonies of the Masse made vp the Canon therof And that He commanded (9) Act. Rom. Pontif. p. 44. 45. 46. 47. Masses to be celebrated vpon the dead Bodies of the Apostles And the (10) Cent. 6 col 369. 370 69â— 694. Centurists charge him with Celebration of Masse Szegedine writeth that Gregorie is sayd to be the first Authour of this propitiatorie Sacrifice about the yeare Six hundred for he appoynted certain dayes in which Sacrifice should be offred with Solemnitie in the Church (11) Graues aliquot Quaestiones printed with Brunlerus fol. 161. 162. promised ardon of sinnes to such as came
ridiculously that reason truth compelleth vs to dissent from them And agayne (55) In omnes Pauli Epist in Hebr. 7. p. 924. How much the more do I admire so manie old Doctours of the Church to be possessed with this opinion that they wil persist in the oblation of Bread wine for thus they say Christ is a Priest according to the order of Melchisedech but Melchisedech offred bread wine therefore the Sacrifice of Bread and wine agreeth to the Sacrifice of Christ D. Fulk (56) Against Hoskins c. p 100. admitteth that It is granted that Cyprian thought the bread wine brought forth by Melchisedech to be a figure of the Sacrament that herein also Melchisedech resembled the Priesthood of Christ And agayne (57) Against Heskins c. p. 99. And see against Rhem. Tâ—st in Hebr. c. 7. sec 8. f. 405. Whitak cont Dur. p. 818. 819. more in general I confesse that diuers of the old Fathers were of opinion that the bread wine which Melchisedech brought forth was sacrificed by him that it was a figure of the Sacrament which they improperly cal a Sacrifice (58) De opificio Missae l. 1. p 28. It is not lawful sayth Chrastouius for Christian Pastours to cast away the consent harmonie of Interpretation that both for the neernes of the Apostolical Age as also for the singular agreement of al which is had in al places c. Al as it were conspiring that the Sacred oblation of Melchisedech is proposed that not only it may be thought to be offred to the Souldiers of Abraham but also an vnbloudy Sacrifice to God The ancient Iewes also were so agreable with vs herein that the Protestant Bibliander doubteth not to affirme that (59) De S. Trinitate l. 2. p. 89. with the Ancient Iewes it was a most receiued opinion that at the câ—ming of the blessed Messias al Legal Sacrifices were to cease only the Sacrifice Thoda of thankes-giuing to be celebrated c. and that to be done with bread wine (60) In his Defence c. p 473. See Parker against Symbolizing part 1. c. 2. p. 103. euen as Melchisedech King of Salem Priest c. brought forth bread and wine The Fathers also likewise much vrge the necessitie of mingling water with wine in the Chalice before oblation and consecration D. Whitguift affirmeth that Cyprian was greatly ouerseen in making it a matter so necessarie in Celebration of the Lords Supper to haue water mingled with wine which was at that time no doubt Common â—o more then to him Carthwright (61) In Whitguift Def. p. 525. acknowledgeth that In the mingling of water with wine a necessitie great mysterie was placed as may appeare both by Iustin Martyr Cyprian And M Iewel (62) In his Reply p. 34. See Schultetus in Med. Theo. p. â—70 also confesseth that Indeed S. Cyprian certain old Fathers spake of it force it much wheras not one new Protestant doth either allow or practise the same But D. Morton (63) Prot. Appeal l. 2. p. 142. is content to refer this new Romish Custome vnto Pope Alexander the supposed Authour thereof sayth he But may not D. Morton blush to cal it New Romish Custome and yet referre it to Pope Alexander who liued almost within a Hundred yeares after Christ Here then we may conclude that our Sacrifice of the Masse was not only allowed and vsed by the Fathers of the Primitiue Church but withal acknowledged by them to be truly a Sacrifice Propitiatorie for the remission of sinnes As also that the same was truly represented by the Sacrifice of Melchisedech offring bread and wine Now the Fathers confessed and reproued by Protestants for our forsayd doctrine of Masse are S. Gregorie Gregorie Turonensis Pelagius Symmachus Leo Austin Ambrose Nyssene Cyril Arnobius Athanasius Cyprian Origen Tertulian Ireneus Alexander Clemens Anacletus Ignatius As also the Councels of Ephesus Antioch the Second and Fourth of Carthage of Constantinople of Arles the Fathers in general The Protestants acknowledging and reprouing the forsayd Fathers are the Centurists Caluin Melancthon Carion Szegedine Hospinian Chitraeus Musculus Marcus Pelargus Osiander Chrastouius Chemnitius Sebastianus Francus Zepperus Schultetus Fox Whitaker Symonides Ascham Fulk Field Whiteguift Iewel Morton It is acknowledged by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church taught and beleeued the Power of Priests to Remission of Sinnes The necessitie of Auricular Confession The Imposition of Pennance and satisfaction to God thereby As also our Roman Doctrine of Pardons or Indulgences CHAPTER X. COncerning the Sacrament of Pennance the (1) Bellarm. de Paenitent l. 1. c. 10. l. 3. c. 2. l. 4. c. 5. Catholick Church teacheth First That God hath giuen truly and properly to Bishops and Priests as his instruments Power and Authoritie to forgiue sinne Secondly That sinners are bound to confesse their Sinnes in particular to Priests Thirdly That the sayd Priests are to impose Pennance or punishment vpon the Penitent after Confession of his Sinnes and that the Penitent in satisfaction is to performe the same by Prayer Fasting Almes-deeds and the like Now the Protestant Church hauing no true Subsistence but being a mere Negation or denial of true Religion directly (2) Instit l. 4 c. 19 §. 15 B za in CoÌ„f. fiâ—â—ci 7. art 11. denyeth al the foresayd Poynts taught and practised by the Roman Church What the Primitiue Church beleeued and practised herein I wholy referre to the plentiful Confe sions and testimonies euen of Protestant Writers And to begin with S. Gregorie Osiander (3) Cent. 6. p. 288. chargeth him that he teacheth vntruly of Pennance And the Centurists (4) Cent. 6. c. 10 p. 748. reprehend him for his opinion of Confession c. Pennance Satisfaction D. Morton acknowledgeth that S. Gregorie (5) Prot Appeale l. 1 sec 23. p. 26. indeed requireth that after man hath confessed his sinnes he should take reuenge of himself by penitential exercises c. S. Hierome tearming Pennance The second Table after Shipwrack Caluin (6) Inst l 4. c. 19. §. 17. reproueth him saying But it is the Saying of Hierome whose soeuer it is it can not be denyed but that it is plainly impious if it be expounded in their sense And as concerning the Power and Authoritie of Priests to remit sinne the denyal therof was reprehended in Acesius by the Emperour Constantin for the Centurists (7) Cent. â— col 653. report that Acesius his opinion was that al men should be exhorted to Pennance but the hope of remission of sinnes should be expected not from Priests but from God But when Acesius had sayd these things the Emperour added â— Acesius set a Ladder and clime alone to heauen This Historie is likewise confessed by Osiander (8) Cent. 4. p. 119. Chemnitius (9) Exam. part â— p. 188 part 2. p.
and euen the whole Chaos of Popish Superstition be builded vp But to cleare S. Gregorie of al Innouation in this point of Doctrine The Centurists acknowledge that (33) Cent. 5. c. 6. col 692. S. Chrysostom mentioneth dayes of Indulgence and Pardon And D. Field (34) Of the Church l. 1. c. 17. p. 33. confesseth that The Ancient Bishops were wont to cut off great partes of enioyned Pennance which remission was called an Indulgence Now to conclude Confession being made and Pennance inioyned the Priest as the Centurists confesse for the practise of the Third Age did afterwards absolue the Penitent euen with the now-like vsed ceremonie of imposing his hand So that the Primitiue and our present Roman Church do confessedly agree in the doctrine of Pennance First As that Priests haue truly Power to remit Sinnes Secondly that Auricular Confession is necessarie Thirdly that after Confession Pennance is to be imposed Fourthly (35) Cent. 3 col 127. that the same is truly Satisfactorie Fiftly after Pennance Absolution is giuen with Imposition of hands Sixtly yea Pardons and Indulgences are acknowledged to be granted and vsed in those purest times of the Church Primitiue Now the Fathers cited and reproued by Protestants for our foresayd doctrines are S. Gregorie Leo Chrysostom the Doctours in the Age of Constantin Ambrose Augustin Cyprian Tertulian the Carthage Councel the 1. Councel of Neece and the Fathers in general The Protestants accusing them are the Centurie-writers Caluin Chemnitius Melancthon Hamelmanus Osiander Hieronimus Marius Pantaleon Valera Symonides Bale Humfrey Field Morton and Whitaker It is granted by Protestants that the Catholick Doctrine of Purgatorie and of Prayer and Sacrifice for the dead was beleeued taught and practised by the Fathers of the Primitiue Church CHAPTER XI WHAT more generally disliked by Protestants then our Catholick doctrine of Purgatorie and our charitable pracise of Praying Sacrificing for the dead And yet what more generally confessed by Protestants to haue been the beleef and custome of the Primitiue Church then Purgatorie Prayer and Sacrifice for the dead Concerning S. Gregorie D. Humfrey (1) In Iesuit part 2. rat 5 p. 5. 627. acknowledgeth that he taught vs Englishmen by the preaching of S. Austin the doctrine of Purgatorie c. the oblation of the healthful Sacrifice Prayers for the dead (2) In Chro. l. 4. p. 567. 568. Carion confesseth that he approued the opinion of the oblation of Christs Bodie Bloud to be made for the dead Iohn Bale (3) In Act. Rom. Pontif. p. 44. 45. 46. 47. is of opinion that he made his foure books of Dialogues for the vpholding of Purgatorie c. and admitted euen Masses for the dead The Magdeburgians (4) In the Index of the 6. Centurie at the word Gregorie charge him out of his owne writings with the Doctrine of Purgatorie c. (5) Cent. 6. col 373. and with oblation of Sacrifice for the dead D. Fulk (6) Ag. Rhem. Test in 1 Cor. 3. sayth In the dayes of Gregorie c. the opinion of Purgatorie had gotten some ground in the Latin Church c. yet in the place by the Rhemistes quoted he granteth it but for very smal offences D. Sutcliffe auoucheth that Gregorie (7) Subuersion c. 4. vsed Litanies allowed Purgatorie c. And wheras D. Whitakers confidently auoucheth that (8) Contra Duraeum l. 7. p. 480. He that first deliuered Purgatorie for a certaine Doctrine was Gregorie the Great Yet M. Symonides (9) Vpon the Reuel p 83. only chargeth him not with beginning but with increasing two pernitious things in the Church Inuocation of the Dead and Prayer for the dead yea D. Morton confesseth that S. Gregory (10) Prot. Appeale l 1. Sec. 17. p. 19. â—0 frameth thus his conclusions Because such Soules departed appearing after desire the help of the liuing the Sacrifice of the Altar is profitahle for them Wherupon our Doctour concludeth saying This doth giue vs cause to obserue in him a deep plunge into Superstition And againe S. Augustin spake with a Peraduenture but S. Gregorie kindled the fire with a Credo c. And now of late the Romanists haue blowâ—e the flame with an Anathema So hotly do Roman Catholicks follow the Sent giuen by S Gregorie and S. Augustin But to clear S. Gregorie of al Innouation in this poynt (11) Ibid. p. 498. I wil ascend to his predecessours and Ancients And to begin with S. Augustin whom though D. Morton pretendeth to speak hereof only with a Paraduenture or doubtfully yet Bullinger hauing perused diuers places of S. Augustins writings concerning this poynt auoucheth (12) De origâ—â— Erroriâ— f. 223. That not in one but in manie places Augustin maketh mention of Sacrifice for the dead c. in Enchirid. c. 109. for it is not to be denyed sayth he but that the Soules of the dead are releeued by the pietie of their liuing friends when the Sacrifice of the Mediatour is offered for them c. And in his 32. sermon de Verbis Apostoli This sayth he deliuered from the Fathers the whole Church obserueth that prayer be made for them who dyed in the Communion of the Bodie and Bloud of Christ when in their place they are remembred in the Sacrifice and the Sacrifice also is offered for them This therfore sayth Bullinger I set downe more at large that thou mayst vnderstand this custome of Sacrificing for the dead to be ordayned not by the Apostles but by the holie Fathers D. Willet affirmeth That diuers of the ancient Fathers (13) Tetrastylon part 3. p. 97. did incline too much to maintayne and commend prayer for the dead with which errour sayth he S. Austin seemeth somewhat to be infected Augustine sayrh Caluin (14) Instâ—t l. 3. c. 5. § 10 in his books of Confessions telleth that his mother Monica earnestly desired that Memorie of her might be made at the Altar in performing the mysteries An old womans desire sayth Caluin which her Sonne squared not by the rule of Scripture but through affection of Nature would haue it approued to others D. Fulk confesseth that (15) In his Confut of Purgat p. 1â—0 Austin de Ciuitate Dei l. 21. c. 13. concludeth verie clearly that some suffer temporal paynes after this life this may not be denyed Yea he boldly auoucheth that Austin (16) Ibid. p 313. blindly defended prayer for the dead D. Morton affirmeth that Protestant Authours (17) Prot. Appeal p. 495. haue obserued S. Augustin to haue been the first who opened the window vnto the doctrine of Purgatorie by whose owne direction sayth he we haue a good warrant to dissent from him c. So admitting S. Austin for Purgatorie but most disgraciously insinuating that therin he is contrarie to himself which as most palpably vntrue I forbeare to confute and only proceed cleerly to shew that neither S. Austin was first nor the sole man that opened
(76) Luc. 1.15 Neither drink wine nor strong drink Al which his austerities and stricter Course of life are thus specially described by the holie Euangelists to his greatest Commendation Yea in these regards the ancient Father tearming him (77) Chrys hom 1. in Marc. hom de Io. Bapt. Hier. ad Eustoch de virg Seruanda Sozom. hist l. 1. c. 12. Cass col 18. c. 5. The Prince or beginner of Monastical life they are therfore reproued by (78) Cent. 5. col 711. Fulk ag Def. of the cens p. 82. Hospin de Origine Monach l. 2 f. 17. Osiand cont 3 p 84. Park in Problem p. 225. the Centurists by D. Fulk Hospinian Osiander M. Parkins Thus then we see that the Religious of these dayes haue taken their Institute and manner of life from their worthiest Predecessours of the Primitiue Church First who no lesse then now did confessedly build Monasteries both for men and women Secondly which also they specially consecrated or hallowed Thirdly the Monks and Nunnes wearing a distinct habit from Secular people Fourthly vsing extraordinarie Austeritie in their Apparel Diet Bed and the like Examples wherof are acknowledged in S. Antonie S. Symeon Fiftly they likewise vowed Chastitie the violating wherof was holden most sinful punishable Sixtly yea such was their Sanctitie that the cōfessedly shined with the Guifts of Miracles Seauenthly and so highly were they reuerenced in these best times that their Impugners and despisers were condemned by the Fathers for wicked Hereticks Eightly adde hereunto that sundrie truly beleeuing Iewes both before since Christ did likewise practise a kind of Monastical life and were therfore as it were the Prototypon of our future Religious Now the Fathers cited and reiected by Protestāts for the foresayd poynts are S. Gregorie Augustin Ambrose Hierom Ruffine Theodoret Sozomene Socrates the Fathers of the Councel of Chalcedon Basil Nazianzene Antonie Symeon Macarius and the ancient beleeuing Iewes The Protestants summoning them are Luther Caluin the Centurists Carion Osiander Hamelmannus Hospinian Iunius Molitor Crispinus Beza Chemnitius Bale Humfrey Carthwright Raynolds Willet Hal Parkins Morton Beard and Whitaker It is acknowledged by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church allowed and practised prescribed fasts and Abstinence from certain meates vpon dayes and times appointed holding the same to be obligatorie vnder sinne Condemning also our Puritan Sabaoth fasts CHAPTER XIX COncerning fasting The Doctrine of the Catholick Church is contayned in foure seueral poynts First that fasting (1) Bellar. de bonis eperihus in Partical l. 2. c 5 6. 7. 23. in general is commanded by God Secondly that fasting vpon certain dayes and from certain meates is not only lawful but being appoynted and commanded by the Church is also obligatorie vnder sinne Thirdly that no meates of their owne nature are vncleane or vnlawful to be eaten Fourthly that in honour of Christ our Sauiours Resurrection Sunday is not fasted The Protestant Church herein teacheth First (2) Caluin Inst l. 4. c. 12 Chemn Exam. part 4 p. 440. that fasting is not commanded by God but left free to the wil and deuotion euerie man Secondly (3) Caluin l 4 Instit c. 12. Luth de Libertate Christiana that the Church hath no Authoritie to command certaine dayes or abstinēce from certaine meates nor Christians bound to obey her therin Thirdly (4) Chemn Exam part 4. p 400 Protestants falsely teach that Catholicks forbeare certaine meates as of their owne nature vncleane or vnlawful Fourthly the most refined Protestants do keep their strictest Fastes vpon the Sunday Now what the Primitiue Church taught and practised concerning fasting I wil appeale to Protestants as witnesses impartial and free from al exception in this case First then M. Bale (5) Iu Act Rom Pontif. p. 44 c. confesseth that S. Gregorie the Great consecrated the beginning of Lent-fast with sprinkling of ashes c. And forbad to those that fasted the vse of flesh milk cheese butter and egges M. Symonides reporteth that (6) Vpon the Reuel p. 85 86. He wrote to Austin that the Clergie should in Quinquagesima abstaine from flesh milke and egges c. Wheras S. Ambrose (7) Serm. 25 34. 36. teacheth that It is sinne not to fast in Lent he is reproued for the same by M. Carth-wright 8) In Whit. Def p. 100. And Melancthon (9) In libelli aliquot c. fol. 9. affirmeth that Ambrose sayth of the fast of Lent c. This is of necessitie This opinion sayth Melancthon is stubble added to the doctrine of Faith He likewise reprehēdeth (10) In Ep. ad Rom. c. 14. p. 389. S. Austin for teaching abstinence from flesh wine in Lent For which verie poynt the Centurists (11) Cent. 4. col 1057. reiect Theophilus Alexandrinus D. Morton speaking of the fast of Lent sayth (12) Prot. Appeal l. 2 p 303. This fast we confesse was of great Antiquitie and c. had in general vse and obseruation which S. Ambrose teacheth to haue been ordayned by the diuine Institution of Christ c. And S. Augustin doth sometime write of the fortie dayes fast that it hath a diuine Authoritie c. M. Trigge not only alloweth himself prescribed and appoynted dayes of fast but alledgeth for the same S. Cyril (14) In his true Cathol p. 600. as also S. (13) Ibid. p. 304. Ambrose (15) Ibid. 601. 602. for fasting in Lent wednesdayes fridayes and withal sayth I would to God at this day al Christians would solemnly euerie week fast wednesday friday c. let vs obserue the fast of Lent and of wednesdayes fridayes c. The Centurists confesse that Epiphanius affirmeth haer 75. that the fast of wednesdayes fridayes vntil the Ninth houre was decreed in al Countries of the world (16) Cent. 4 col 440. and that he referreth the authoritie of that Decree vnto the Apostles They likewise (17) Cent. 4 col 44. admit that Gregorie Nyssen relateth the fasting from flesh wine in Lent And speaking of the Fourth Age (18) Cent. 5. col 44. in general they acknowledge that Histories testify that Christians of this Age did obserue fastes and that more Religiously or say the Centurists more superstitiously then in former Ages But the Fathers in this poynt were so resolute as that they doubted not to condemne Aerius for his contrarie Protestant Doctrine D. Fulk (19) In his Answer to a counterf Cath. p. 44. 45 and see Pantaleon in his Chron. p. 28. sayth I wil not dissemble that which you think the greatest matter Aerius taught that prayer for the dead was vnprofitable as witnesse both Epiphanius Austin which they count for an errour Also he taught that fasting dayes are not to be obserued D. Field (20) Of the Church l. 3. c. 22. p 138. likewise writeth The eleuenth is the heresy of Aerius c. He disliked set Fastes c. He was
Apostles withal and the Euangelists themselues euen after their receauing of the Holie-Ghost did write teach and defend seueral errours how can anie Christian build an infaillible sauing Faith vpon the Ghospels or other Apostolical writings How then can they be acerteyned of anie one true sentence of God's Word if the writers and deliuerers therof were not infallibly guided by the Holie-Ghost into al truth and so freed from al errour ignorance misprision or falshood And if some peraduenture except that these so Atheistical and Sacrilegious reproaches imposed vpon the sacred Scriptures and the Blessed Euangelists and Apostles be not the ordinarie opinions or practise of Protestants but peraduenture only of some few either ignorant or not endowed with the spirit the falshood and vanitie of this euasion is most apparent for who of forraine Protestants were euer reputed more learned or more enlightned with the spirit then Luther Caluin Beza Chemnitius Islebius Illiricus with the other Centurie-writers Castalio Zuinglius Musculus Brentius Andreas Friccius Adamus Francisci Bullinger and sundrie such others al of them highly esteemed of by their other Protestant Brethren Or who at home more honoured then Tyndal Iewel Goad Fotherbie Fulk Whitaker c. and yet al of those being indeed the primest men that euer they had do ioyntly conspire in this greatest impietie of censuring controuling correcting or reiecting some one part or other of the forenamed Canonical Scriptures or els of condemning the Euangelists and Apostles of seueral errours infirmities and sliding in matters of faith and Religion Which foule proceeding of so manie and so learned Protestants doth euidently according to D. Fulk's Rule conuince them to be perfect Hereticks For (88) Confut. of Purgatorie p. 214. whosoeuer sayth he denieth the authoritie of the Holy Scriptures thereby bewrayeth himself to be an Heretick Laus Deo B. V. Mariae FINIS A TABLE OF THE BOOKES AND CHAPTERS THE FIRST BOOKE WHERIN IS PROVED BY THE Confession of Protestants that the Catholick Roman Church hath continued Euer most Knowne and Vniuersal euen from Christs verie Time vntil the Date hereof THE antiquitie of the true Church and the force of the Argument drawne from the Authoritie thereof As also of these great necessitie of finding-out this true Church chap. 1. fol. 1. That the present Roman Church and Religion for the last thousand yeares after Christ haue stil continued most Knowne and Vniuersal throughout the Christian world chap. 2. fol. 4. A further confirmation of the vniuersal continuance of our Roman Church Religiō for these last thousand yeares is taken from the Confessed belief and profession of such Persons as liuing within the foresayd time were most Famous and Notorious in one respect or other chap. 3. fol. 8. That the faith of S. Gregorie S. Augustin and whereto England was by them conuerted was our Roman Catholick and not Protestant chap. 4. fol. 10. That the present Roman Church and Religion continued and flourished during the whole time of the Primitiue Church contayning the first six hundred yeares after Christ chap. 5. fol. 20. A further proof of the present Roman Religions Continuance from the Apostles time to these dayes is taken from the Christian belief of the Indians Armenians Grecians and Brittans al of them Conuerted in the dayes of the Apostles chap. 6. fol. 27. THE SECOND BOOKE Wherin is proued through al the chief Articles of Religion and that by the Confessions of Protestants that the same Faith which is now taught by the Roman Church was anciently taught by the Primitiue Church of Christ THat General Councels do truly represent the Church of Christ And of the Credit and Authoritie giuen by Protestants to the sayd Councels chap. 1. fol. 1. That the argument drawne from the Authoritie of the Primitiue Church of Christ and of her Doctours and Pastours is an Argument of force And for such approued by sundrie learned Protestants chap. 2. fol. 3. That the Fathers and Doctours of the Primitiue Church beleeued and taught that S. Peter was ordayned by Christ the Head of the Apostles and of the whole Church and that the Church was founded vpon S. Peter it is Confessed by Protestants themselues chap. 3. fol. 8. It is Confessed by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church beleeued taught the Bishop of Rome to succeed S. Peter in the Primacie of the whole Church chap. 4. fol. 11. It is confessed by Protestants that the Primitiue Church of Christ beleeued the Bookes of Tobie Iudith Ester Sapientia Ecclesiasticus and two first of Machabees to be truly Canonical Scripture chap. 5. fol. 25. It is acknowledged by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church beleeued taught our now Catholick Doctrine concerning Traditions chap. 6. fol. 30. It is Confessed by Protestants that according to the Fathers of the Primitiue Church the Sacraments do truly conferre Grace and Remission of sinnes And that they are in number seauen chap. 7. fol. 32. It is Confessed by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church beleeued and taught the Real Presence of Christs true Bodie and Bloud in the Eucharist As also our further Catholick Doctrines of Transubstantiation Adoration Reseruation and the like chap. 8. fol. 35. Protestants confesse that the Primitiue Church of Christ beleeued taught practised the Sacrifice of the Masse as also that it is a Sacrifice according to the order of Melchisedech and truly Propitiatory for the liuing the dead chap. 9. fol. 41. It is acknowledged by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church taught and beleeued the Power of Priests to Remission of Sinnes The necessitie of Auricular Confession The Imposition of Pennance and satisfaction to God thereby As also our Roman Doctrine of Pardons or Indulgences chap. 10. fol. 46. It is granted by Protestants that the Catholick Doctrine of Purgatorie of Prayer and Sacrifice for the dead was beleeued taught and practised by the Fathers of the Primitiue Church chap. 11. fol. 50. It is confessed by Protestants that the. Fathers of the Primitiue Church beleeued and taught our Catholick Doctrine of Christs Descending into Hel. chap. 12. fol. 55. It is confessed by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church beleeued and practised our Catholick Doctrine of praying to Angels and Saints chap. 13. fol. 57. It is confessed by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church allowed the vse of Christs Image and his Saincts placing them euen in churches and Reuerencing them chap. 14. fol. 60. It is acknowledged by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church did specially honour reuerence the holie Relicks of Martyrs and other Saints carrying them in Processions and making Pilgrimages vnto them at which also manie Miracles were wrought chap. 15. fol. 63. It is confessed by Protestants that the holie Doctours of the Primitiue Church not only vsed the signe of the Crosse but likewise worshiped the same attributing great efficacie power and vertue thervnto chap.
16. f. 65. It is confessed by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church allowed and practised the vow of Chastitie and that they neuer allowed such as were of the Clergie afterwards to marrie or such as had been twice married to be admitted to holie Orders without special dispensation chap. 17. fol. 69. It is confessed by Protestants that the Fathers of the Promitiue Church allowed practised the Religious State of Monastical life and that manie Christians of those purest times both men and women did strictly obserue and professe the same chap. 18. f. 74. It is acknowledged by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church allowed practised prescribed fasts and abstinence from certaine meats vpon dayes and times appointed holding the same obligatorie vnder sinne condemning also our Puritan Sabboath Fasts chap. 19. fol. 80. It is admitted by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church expresly taught our Catholick Doctrine concerning Free wil. chap. 20. fol. 84 It is granted by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church taught not only Faith but likewise Good works truly to iustifye that the sayd works are meritorious of Grace and Glorie chap. 21. fol. 86. It is acknowledged by Protestants that the Ceremonies now vsed in the Roman Church in the ministring of seruice or Sacrifice as also of the Sacraments were formerly vsed by the Bishops Priests and Fathers of the Primitiue Church chap. 22. fol. 89 THE THIRD BOOK WHERIN is proued that the Church of Protestants was neuer knowne or in Being before the d yes of Luther And that the Articles of Religion now taught by the Protestant Congregation were Heresies condemned by the Primitiue Church of Christ IT is confessed by Protestants that from the dayes of the Apostles vntil the tyme of Luther themselues neuer had any knowne Church or Congregatiō in anie part of the vniuersal World chap. 1. fol. 1. A Further conuincing proof of the Protestant Churches not being during the first 600. yeares is taken from the Fathers Condemning in the ancient Hereticks the chiefest articles of the Protestant Religion and our Protestants Confessing the same And First Concerning the Sacraments chap. 2. fol. 6. That the Fathers condemned in ancient Hereticks the opinions of Protestants concerning the Scriptures and the Church Militant and Triumphant chap. 3. fol. 9. That the Fathers condemned in ancient Hereticks the opinions of Protestants concerning Monachisme the mariage of Priests and prescribed Fasts chap. 4. fol. 12. That the Fathers condemned in ancient Hereticks the opinions of Protestants concerning Free-wil Faith Good works the Commandments sinne and the knowledge and Death of Christ chap. 5. fol. 14. Protestants Vsual recrimination of obiecting old Heresies to the Catholick Roman Church is cleerly examined discouered confuted by their owne acknowledgements chap. 6. fol. 17. A Further trial is Made Whether Catholicks or Protestants be true Hereticks and this by sundrie knowne badges or markes of Heresie chap. 7. fol. 23. A brief Suruey of D. Whites Catalogue wherin contrary to the Confessed truth in the precedent Chapter of no knowne beginning or change of our Romane Faith in anye Age he vndertaketh according to his Title therof to shew That the present Religion of the Roman Church was obserued resisted in al Ages as it came in and increased naming withal the Persons that made the Resistance And the poynts wherin And the time when from fiftie yeares to fiftie through-out al Ages since Christ chap. 8. fol. 35. THE FOVRTH BOOK WHERIN is proued by the Confession of Protestants that according to the Sacred Scriptures the Roman Church is the true Church of Christ And so to haue euer continued from his time vntil the Date hereof And of the contrary the Protestants Church to be only a Sect Heretical and neuer to haue been before the dayes of Luther PRotestants flying to the sacred Scriptures in proof defence of their Church and Religion it is shewed the sayd flight not only in itself to be dishonourable but also to be the ordinarie flight of al moderne Hereticks chap. 1. fol. 1. That euen the Sacred Scriptures themselues do most plentifully testify our Romane Church to be the Church of of Christ and the Congregation or Church of Protestants to be no true Church but a Sect Heretical most contrarie to the said Scriptures And that first by the Churches necessarie continuance and vniuersalitie chap. 2. fol. 5. The second Proof from sacred Scriptures in cōfirmation of the Roman Church and Confutation of the Protestant is taken from the Euer visibilitie of Christ's Church chap. 3. fol. 10. The third Proof from Sacred Scriptures in Cōfirmation of the Roman Church and Confutation of the Protestant is taken from the Churches Pastours which must euer continue with lawful Calling and Succession and with Administration of Word and Sacraments chap. 4. fol. 13. The fourth Proof from sacred Scriptures in confirmation of the Roman Church and Confutation of the Protestant is taken from the Conuersion of Heathen Kings and Nations to the Faith of Christ chap. 5. fol. 24. A Discouerie or brief Examination of sundrie sleights and Euasions vsed by Protestant Writers in Excuse of the manifest confessed want of their Churches fulfilling the foresaid Scripiures concerning the continuance vniuersalitie and visibilitie of Christs true Church chap. 6. fol. 33. THE FIFT BOOK WHERIN is shewed that Protestants in the Decision of Controuersies between them and Catholicks do absolutly disclaime from Antiquitie reiecting the Ancient Fathers and Councels for Papistical and the Sacred Scriptures for erroneous THat Protestants Disclaime from al Antiquitie since the Apostles and further reiect and condemne as Papistical the Ancient Fathers and General Councels chap. 1. fol. 1. That the Protestant Church disclaimeth from the Fathers of the Primitiue Church it is further proued by the Protestants condemning al the ancient Fathers in general for beleeuing teaching and practising the seueral particular actions of our Catholick Roman Faith and Religion chap. 2. fol. 12. That Protestants do not only disclaime from al the ancient Fathers as Papists but do further reiect the authoritie of the sacred Scriptures and of the Apostles themselues as being erroneous and that therefore they do not found their Faith or Religion vpon Sacred Scriptures or Christ his Apostles chap. 3. fol. 18. A TABLE SHEWING THE particular matters handled in this Booke A. AELfricus no Protestant l. 3. c. 8. pag. 51. Albigenses taught sundrie errours lib. 1. c. 3. pag. 12. Almaricus his errours l. 3. c. 8. p. 55. Antiquitie commended Praef. to the Reader and lib. 5. c. 1. pag. 1. 2. Antiquitie reiected by Protestants as a Popish Argument l. 1. c. 5. pag. 26. Anthonie the Monk commended l. 2. c. 18. Apostles according to Protestants erred in Faith euen after the comming of the Holie-Ghost l. 5. c. 3. p. 23. 25. Apocalyps reiected by Protestants lib. 5 c. 3. p. 24. Armenia conuerted by the Apostles lib. 1. c. 6. p.
the longest Continuance and greatest Antiquitie is a Popish Argument And the Doctrine of the Pope or Church of Rome was so timely working as that it was in being euen in the Apostles dayes For our Conclusion then we haue it here confessed that euer since the time of Constantin and Pope Siluester which contayneth some 1300 yeares al Popes and the Church of Rome haue been so agreable in Doctrine and Faith with our Present Pope and Church that therefore they are al censured for Antichrists Rome for Babylon the imagined Protestant Church during the same time not hauing anie one visible member in the world And not only this but that euen our first Christian Emperours are reproued by Protestants in regard of their very Religion and their honouring and defending of the foresayd Popes And as for the Roman Churches continuance from Christs time vntil the Raygne of Constantin it is plentifully acknowledged that as she was founded by the Apostles so she continued in the doctrine of the Apostles euen vntil the verie times of S. Augustin who flourished almost 100. yeares after Constantin in so much as during al the sayd time the verie Succession of Roman Bishops is granted by Protestants to haue been a good proof of the true Faith And wheras S. Austins Rule of making al such Doctrine truly Apostolical as hath no knowne beginning since the Apostles is approued and applauded by the learnedst Protestants yet themselues likewise confesse that the allowance of this Rule is the opening of a window to bring in al Poperie so truly Apostolical is the Doctrine of Papists Adde lastly that the Antiquitie of our present Papistrie is confessedly no lesse gray-headed then the times of S. Paul and the other Apostles and the continuance therof euer since such as that perusing Councels Fathers and Stories from the Apostles we stil find the print of the Popes feet Now my kindest Aduocats in this so important a Plea are no other then Caluin Suinglius Zanchius Danaeus Beza Winckelmanus Sebastianus Francus Rhegius Brocard Brightman Leigh Napper Parkins Whitaker Powel Fulk Raynolds Ridley Iewel Bunnie Carthwright Parker Field Whitguift Fotherbie Willet Midleton and Morton al of them Protestant Writers and men much renowned by their other Brethren A FVRTHER PROOF OF THE PRESENT ROMAN Religions Continuance from the Apostles times to these dayes is taken from the Christian belief of the Indians Armenians Grecians Brittans al of them Conuerted in the dayes of the Apostles CHAPTER VI. IT is recorded by sundrie Historiographers and acknowledged for most true by the learnedst Protestants that manie Heathen Nations were conuerted by the Apostles themselues to the Faith of Christ whereof peculiar instance is giuen of India Armenia Graecia Britanie c. The Conuersion of India is confessed by (1) Cent. 1. p. 37. Osiander and (2) Comment de Regno Christi p. 45. Nicolaus Phillippi affirmeth S. Thomas to haue been their first Apostle Chemnitius (3) Exam. part 2. p. 7. teacheth that S. Bartholomew preached the Ghospel to the Armenians And as for the Conuersion of Greece it clearly appeareth by Saint Pauls Epistles to sundrie of that Nation as to the Corinthians Ephesians Thessalonians and by the Apocalypse chap. 1. vers 11. Now as concerning the first Conuersion of Britanie it was so vndoubtedly Apostolick as that (4) Britannia c. p. 40. M. Cambden auoucheth that It is certayne that the Brittans receiued the Christian Religion in the verie infancie of the Church In proof wherof he there alleageth sundrie ancient Authorities (5) Ibid. p. 157. And See M. Hal in his Apologie against the Brovvnists p. 58. Further also teaching that in Britannie flourished the Monasterie of Glassenburie which taketh its ancient beginning from Ioseph of Arimathia c. for this the ancientest Monuments of this Monasterie do testify c. Neither is there cause why we should doubt thereof In like sort sayth (6) Description of Britanie annexed vnto Holinshead c. v. 1. p. 23. M. Harison That Ioseph preached here in England in the Apostles times his Sepulchre yet in Glassenburie and Epitaph affixed thereto is proof sufficient (7) Remedie against Schisme p. 24. M. Henoch Clapham is so confident of the Britans conuersion in the Apostles times as that he auoucheth that our Schismatikes may aswel ask me what assurance I haue there was a King Henrie as demand what assurance I haue of the other (8) Against Rhem. Test in 2. Cor. 12. fol. 316. D. Fulk thefore calleth them The Catholick Brittans with whom Christian Religion had continued in succession since the Apostles times This then supposed that al the former Countries were conuerted to Christianitie by Christ his Apostles and disciples themselues The next point to be examined is whether the sayd Faith and Religion which as then they learned receaued and beleeued and which for sundrie succeding Ages they practised and professed is more agreable to the present Roman or Protestant Faith And first as concerning the Indians (9) Comment de Regno Christi l. 1. p. 45. 46. D. Philippus Nicolai relateth that India in sundrie places is inhabited by them in great number who receiued the doctrine of the Ghospel from S. Thomas the Apostle c. vpon the seauenth day according to our custome they meete in the Churches that they may be present at the Sacrifices heare Sermons they vse in their Sacrifices wine made of dryed Grapes giuing bread they not only giue the bodie of Christ but also by drinking of the consecrated Chalice they giue his bloud hauing before made confession of their sinnes c. At the entrance of the church like vnto the Papists they are sprinkled with holie water with the same rite and the same religion they burie the dead c. praying vnto Christ for their eternal Saluation c. The Priests are so shauen vpon the head that they haue vpon the crowne the Image of the Crosse Amongst them there are Societies of Monks and companies of Sacred Virgins shut vp in seueral houses Chastitie is kept by al them with a great desire of honestie abstinence and religion c. They strictly obserue the fasts of Aduent and Lent c. And In the honour of S. Thomas they keep a Festiual day Yea he further writeth (10) Ibid. p. 64. of the remote Cataians of India that they haue their chappels in which for the safetie of their Marchants trauayling in strang countries Sacrifice is offred with Popish ceremonies and Masses Now by this testimonie of so learned a Protestant it appeareth that the Indian Christians first conuerted by S. Thomas retayne yet and practise these Catholick poynts of Faith The real presence of Christs Bodie and Bloud in the Eucharist Confession of sinnes before Receiuing Sprinkling with holie water prayer for the dead Shauing Priestes Crownes The Image of the Crosse Companies of Monks and Nunnes their Chastitie and abstinence The Feasts of Aduent and Lent The
that Pelagius Celestius Iulianus al of them Hereticks do see and Hilarie Gregorie Ambrose c. are blind This so worthie a Saying of S. Austin being alleaged against the Puritans by D. Bancroft he therupon inferreth (32) Suruey p. 352. 353. 351. Surely I do not perceiue why I may not without offence apply the same wordes to those men in those dayes c. Were there neuer learned men before you were taught the Principles of the Geneua Discipline c. Do you know what was in the Apostles times better then they who succeded the Apostles c. Is the light that shewed it self so manie wayes in the Ancient Fathers become such darknes that Carthwright Trauerse Fenner to whom I might as truly adde Luther Zuinglius Caluin Beza c. and such like should be thought so clearlie-sighted And shal Ireneus Tertulian Cyprian Ambrose Hierom Chrysostom Austin Gregorie Hilarie and al the rest of those whorthie men be reckned blind So cleerly doth D. Bancroft the Protestant late Primate of England acknowledge the shining light and glorie of the ancient Fathers and defend their authoritie from the imputations of Nouelists D. Morton ioyfully acknowledgeth (33) Prot. Appeal p. 33. That the ancient Fathers c. did obtayne in the Church of Christ honourable Titles as Augustin the great Mall or hammer against Hereticks Basil the light of the world Chrysostome The Doctour of the whole world Athanasius the Pillar as it were of the Church Nazianzene by a phrase of excellencie the Diuine Origen the Maister of the churches Cyprian the President of the whole world And lastly Ambrose A man called by God vnto an Apostolical Presidencie Now as for the Confidence which Catholicks place in the ancient Fathers D. Morton testifyeth for vs that (34) Ib. p 348 Neuer did the ancient Iewes more boast of their original and descent from father Abraham then do the Romanists glory in their pretended consent of ancient Fathers And though it be true that the ancient Fathers were men yet (35) Eccl. Pol. p. 115. The strength of mans Authoritie in M. Hookers iudgement is affirmatiuely such that the weightiest affaires in the world depend therupon Yea (36) Ib. p. 116. whatsoeuer we beleeue concerning saluation by Christ although the Scripture be therin the ground of our beleef yet is mans Authoritie sayth he the key that openeth the doore c. The Scripture could not teach vs these things vnles we beleeued men And wheras the sacred Scriptures do foretel sundrie things to be performed by the Church of Christ in succeeding Ages the answerable accomplishment therof in particular being matter of fact can be to vs at this day no otherwise made knowne then vpon the Credit of humane Testimonie commended to vs by Ecclesiastical Histories In which respect D. Whitaker truly teacheth that (37) Cont. Duraeum l. 7. p. 472. Historie plainly testifyeth al that to be accomplished which the ancient Prophets haue foretold concerning the Propagation amplitude and glorie of the Church So that there is no doubt sayth he but that Ecclesiastical Historie doth strengthen the Predictions of the Prophets Now from the Premisses we may briefly remember that not only al Catholicks but euen the Primest ProtestaÌ„ts that euer were do thus willingly appeale for the decision of Controuersies in Faith and Religion to the Censure and Determination of the Church of Christ which for the first six hundred yeares was confessedly sincere holie and religious Acknowledging withal the integritie and puritie of the Roman Church during the sayd time and professing to beleeue and teach no other Faith and religion then that which was taught and beleeued by the ancient Fathers of the same Church This then supposed I wil now descend in particular to the chiefest articles of Faith disputed at this day between Catholicks and Protestants And wil only examine whether the Roman or Protestant Church is now more agreable with the confessed Faith and Religion of the Fathers of the Primitiue Church in the foresayd poynts And for the cleerest preuenting of the manifold shiftes and euasions vsed by ProtestaÌ„ts when they are vrged in this kind I wil only produce such proofe from the Primitiue Church and Fathers as is recorded and confessed by Protestants and by them disliked and reiected as agreeing with our Roman Faith and condemning Protestancie THAT THE FATHERS AND DOCTOVRS OF the Primitiue Church beleeued and taught that S. Peter was ordayned by Christ the Head of the Apostles and of the whole Church and that the Church was founded vpon S. Peter it is Confessed by Protestants themselues CHAPTER III. BEcause the deciding of this present Controuersie of the Churches Primacie is indeed the speediest and most certaine meanes for the final dissoluing of al doubts in Religion either already begun or hereafter to arise I wil therfore more particularly and at large set downe the manifest and confessed Doctrine and practice of the Primitiue Church concerning the same And first as al gouernment whether Politick or Ecclesiastical the more it reseÌ„bleth the gouernment of this world by the Creatour therof ONE GOD or the gouernment of the Church during our Sauiours aboad vpon earth by ONE CHRIST the more it is to be approued coÌ„mended and followed so nothing is holden more Soueraigne or more needful for the procuring or preseruing of vnitie and concord in anie Bodie or Communitie then the vnitie of one Head or gouernment Monarchical Herevpon the (1) Bel. de Rom. Pont l. 1. c. 10. l. 2. c 12. Catholick Church doth beleeue and teach That S. Peter was ordayned by Christ the Supreme Ecclesiastical Head not only ouer the rest of the Apostles but euen ouer the whole Church And that the Bishop of Rome succeedeth him in the same Power and Authoritie The direct (2) Luther l de Potestate Papae in assertione Art 25. Calu. l. 4 Instit c 6. Morton in his Appeale l. 2. c. 5. Sect. 11. Negatiue wherof is not only taught by the protestant-Protestant-Church but withal it further beleeueth maintayneth that the Bâ—shop of Rome in steed of being the true Successour of S. Peter and the Vicar of Christ is the true Antichrist or Man of Sinne wherof so much is foretold in the sacred Scriptures To discouer now the Faith and practise of the Primitiue Church and to begin with the confessed Primacie of S. Peter And first that for the preseruing of vnitie and preuenting of Schismes he was appoynted by Christ the Supreme Head of that slender Bodie or litle Church of the twelue Apostles Wheras S. Hierom l. 1. cont Iouinianum teacheth that Amongst the Twelue one is chosen that a Head appoynted the occasion of Schisme should be taken away From hence (3) In his Examination c. against the Plea of the Innocent p. 106. 107. D. Couel hauing spoken of the necessitie of One aboue the rest to suppresse the seed of dissention thus argueth most strongly If this were the Principal
for our present Controuersie and manie others that M Carthwright (6) In Whit. Def. p. 103. And in his 2. Reply against Whit. part 1 p 84-85 86. sayth therof To allow of Austin's Saying is to bring in Poperie againe And if S. Austins Iudgement be a good Iudgement then there be some things commanded of God which are not in the Scriptures and therupon no sufficient doctrine contayned in the Scriptures Caluin also acknowledgeth the same words of S. Austin yet confesseth (7) Inst l 4. c. 10. § 20. not to respect them affirming also that Austin hath nothing besides coniectures In like sort S. Chrysostom in expresse words teaching (8) In 2. Thes hom 4. that The Apostles did not deliuer al things by writing but manie things without these be as worthie of credit as the other D. Whitaker (9) De sacra Scriptura p. 678. in answer hereto sayth I answer that this is an inconsiderat speach and vnworthie of so great a Father And wheras Epiphanius haer 6â— teacheth that we must vse Traditions for the Scripture hath not al things and therfore the Apostles deliuered certain things by writing and certain by Tradition with whom agreeth S. Basil de Spiritu Sancto c. 27. saying Some things we haue from Scripture other things from the Apostles Tadition c. both which haue like force vnto Godlines D. Raynolds (10) In his Conclusions to his Conf. Conc. 1. p. 689. his answer to these foresayd Sayings of S. Basil Epiphanius is I take not vpon me to controle them but let the Church iudge if they considered with aduise enough c. In like sort Eusebius affirming l. 1. Demonstr Euang. c. 8 that the Apostles published their Doctrine partly by writing partly without writing as it were by a certaine vnwritten Law D. Whitaker (11) De sacra Scriptura p 668. sayth hereof I answer that this Testimonie is plaine enough but in no force ta be receiued because it is against the Scriptures Chemnitius (12) Exam. part 1. p. 87. 89. 90. reproueth for their like testimonie of vnwritten Traditions Clemens Alexandrinus Origen Epiphanius Ambrose Hierom Maximus Theophilus Basil c. And M. Fulk (13) Against Purg. p. 302 303. 397 And agâ—inst Martial p. 170. 178. Anâ— against Bristowes Moâ—â—â—s p. 35. 36. confesseth as much of Chrysostome Tertulian Cyprian Augustin Hierom c. Schrederus (14) Opusc Theol. p. 72. acknowledgeth that Origen and Basil in his book of the holie-Ghost and Hierom against the Luciferians do relate manie Customes which they cal Doctrines receaued by Tradition without writing as Threefold immersion in Baptisme Prayer towards the East the words of Inuocation when the Bread of the Eucharist is shewed c. prohibition to Fast on Sunday c. Sacrifices for the dead c. And D. Whitaker (15) De sacra Script p. 678 681. 683 685. 690. 695. 696. 670. 668. acknowledgeth and reproueth for their like doctrine of Traditions Chrysostom Epiphanius Tertulian Cyprian Augustin Innocentius Leo Basil Eusebius c. The Centurists (16) Cent 4. p 299. condemne al the Fathers of the Fourth Age one by one reciting their Sentences and reiecting them Chemnitius reciting and reiecting the Sayings of Origen (17) Exâ—m part 1. p. 87. concludeth thus So Origen iudgeth that there are Apostolical Traditions And D. Fulk 18) Agaâ—â—st Purg. p. 393 confesseth that Tertulian taught Sacrifice and prayer for the dead vpon Traditions from the Apostles D. Whitaker (19) De sacra Script p. 685. being to answer S. Cyprians playne Sayings for Traditions writeth thus I answer first Cyprian was no Apostle and therefore his words are to be examined and not al things forthwith to be receaued c. therfore let vs not regard what he sayth c. Lastly wheras S. Dyonisius de Eccles Hierarchia c. 1. S. Paul's Schollar affirmeth that the Apostles did deliuer their Doctrine partly by writing partly without writing c. D. Whitaker (20) De sacra Script p. 655. deuoyd of al answear or euasion sayth I do acknowledge that Dionisius is in manie places a great Patrone of Traditions And D. Fulk (21) In his Answear to a Count. Cath p. 35. confessing that Papias was Scholler to S. Iohn yet M. Midleton 22) Papisto-mastix p. 200. affirmeth that Papias was the first Father and Founder of Traditions But Before al these liued the ancient Iewes of whom Paulus Fagius writeth that (23) Comment in Cap. Patrum The Iewes are of opinion that Moses receiued from God in Mount Sinai a double Law the one which they cal the Law deliuered in writing the other which they cal the Law which is in the mouth or deliuered by word of mouth And this last they affirme to be deriued by Moyses to posteritie by a certain order of Succession And the self same is confessed by D. Beard (24) Rotract from Rom. Relig. â— 73 74. M. Rollock likewise auoucheth that (25) Treatise of Gods effectual calling p. 241. The Church after Moyses had both the Tradition or sound of a liuely voice and of the Scripture and written Word of God And the same Doctrine of Traditions in the Iewes is confessed by Buxdorfius (26) Synagoga Iudaica p. 13 21. 48 67. a Protestant Hebrew Reader in Basile D. Morton admitteth that (27) Prot. Appeal l. 2. p 377. The Protestants wil as readily confesse that the Iewes pretended vnwritten Traditions as could either Egesippus or Anatolius but whether they did make that boast vniustly or iustly that sayth he is worthie our m st diligent Scanne Wel then the Fathers here confessed and disliked by Protestants for our Catholick Doctrine of Traditions are S. Gregorie Austin Ambrose Hierome Chrysostom Epiphanius Basil Eusebius Maximus Theophilus Innocentius Leo Cyprian Origen Tertulian Clemens Alexandrinus Dionisius Areopagita Papias and the faithful Iewes before Christ The Protestants citing and reprouing the sayd Fathers herein are Chemnitius Caluin Schrederus Buxdorfius Whitaker Carthwright Morton Beard Rollock Fulk and Rainolds So Apparent it is that our present Roman Church in the Doctrine of Traditions doth stil insist in the steps of the Primitiue Church It is Confessed by Protestants that according to the Fathers of the Primitiue Church the Sacraments do truly conferre Grace Remission of sinnes And that they are in number seauen CHAPTER VII PRotestants (1) Luth. in Assert 1. Articuli teaching Faith alone to iustify do consequently affirme the Sacraments to be but bare Signes not causes of our Iustification seruing either euen as preaching for an obiect to stir vp and nourish our Faith or for certaine markes whereby the Faithful are discerned from Infidels But contrarie hereto the Catholick Church (2) Conc. Florent ln Institut ArmenoruÌ„ Trid sess 7. can 1. hath defined the Sacraments to giue or conferre Grace to the worthie receiuer and that they joyntly with Faith and other vertues concurre to our
Cyprian erroneously maketh necessarie Chemnitius (30) Exam. part 2 p. 58 also reprehendeth S. Cyprian for saying of Baptisme and Confirmation Then they may be clearly sanctifyed and become the sonnes of God if they be borne of both Sacraments 31) Against Symb p. 133. M. Parker reproueth (32) Ep. ad Iubaianum S. Cyprian for tearming The Oyle Signaculum Dominicum our Lords Seale And Chemnitius (33) Exam. part 2 p. 58. 64. 65. chargeth not only S. Cyprian but also the Laodicen Councel Melchiades Cornelius and Tertulian for the Sacrament of Confirmation For which also Danaeus (34) Resp ad Tom 2. Bell. p. 451. 452. reciteth and reiecteth sundrie of the ancient Fathers Concerning holie Orders to omit that already it is confessed here that S. Cyprian Tertulian and S. Denis did teach them to be truly a Sacrament numbring them amongst the rest the verie Minores Ordines inferiour Orders of Deacons Subdeacons Readers Exorcists Acolytes are so plainly taught in the Primitiue Church that D. Field maketh (35) Of the Church l. 5. p. 121 OsiaÌ„d cent 1. p. 131. no question but these Minour Orders were verie ancient alledging in proof therof the testimonies of Cyprian Cornelius and Ignatius And for the same the 36) Cent. 4. col 873. p. 874. Centurists alledge the Fathers of the Fourth Age. (37) Tom. 6. Wittemb fol. 53. But Luther confesseth that S. Denis S. Pauls Scholler affirmeth that there are in the Church Bishops Deacons Subdeacons Lectours Exorcistes c. Lastly as touching Extreame vnction Innocentius is reproued by (38) PageaÌ„t of Popes fol. 26. Szeged in Speculo Pontif. p 33. M. Bale Szegedine for that he affirmed Anoyling of the Sick to be a Sacrament Wel then the Poynts here confessedly taught by the Fathers of the Primitiue Church are that the Sacraments do not only signify but truly conferre Grace Iustification and Remission of sinnes That Infants dying vnbaptised can not be saued That in case of necessitie Lay-persons may baptize and that the Sacraments are seauen in number Now the Fathers produced and reproued by Protestants for these Poynts are S. Austin Innocentius Cyprian Origen Tertulian Iustin Clement Vrban the Councel of Laodicea Melchiades Cornelius Ignatius S. Denis The Protestants charging the foresayd Fathers are Luther Caluin Musculus the Mâ—gdeburgians Zuinglius Sarcerius Bucer Bullinger Scultetus Rhegius Chemnitius Danaeus Osiander Whitaker Carthwright Humfrey Parker Field Bale So euident it is that the Primitiue and our now Roman Church do most truly agree in the Doctrine number of the holie Sacraments It is Confessed by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church beleeued and taught the Real Presence of Christs true Bodie and Bloud in the Eucharist As also our further Catholick Doctrines of Transubstantiation Adoration Reseruation and the like CHAPTER VIII IT is the (1) Conc. Trid s ss 1â— c. 1. 4. certaine and general Decree of the Catholick Church that in the Blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist after the Consecration of bread and wine our Lord IESVS CHRIST God and man is truly really and substantially contayned vnder the formes of those sensible creatures And that the whole Substance of bread is conuerted into the Substance of Christs Bodie and the whole substance of wine into the substance of his Bloud which Conuersion is fitly called Transubstantiation Protestants herein being much diuided amongst themselues The (2) Luth. l. de Captiuit Babyl c. de Euchar. Chemn l. duabus Christi naturis Lutherans teach the Real Presence no lesse plainly then Catholicks only with this difference that they think withal the bread and wine to remayne after Consecration with the Bodie and Bloud which alteration is called Consubstantiation (3) Zuingl l De vera falsa Relig. Zuinglians are of opinion that Eucharist is only a signe figure or remembrance of Christs Bodie no wayes truly contayning the same Caluinists (4) Cvlu l. de Coena Domini Beza de Caena Domini seem in shew more liberal admitting the Bodie of Christ to be truly and really in the Sacrament and that the Sacrament is not only a Signe or figure or that thereby is only giuen to vs the fruits merits of Christs Bodie but euen the Bodie itself yet with this qualification that the same is not receiued by the bodilie mouth of the CoÌ„municant but only by his Faith Neither that the bread wine cease to be or are conuerted into the Bodie and Bloud of Christ but that when the bread and wine are receaued with the bodily mouth at the same time the bodie bloud of Christ are receaued spiritually mystically and by Faith Now in one thing herein I wil accord with D. Morton that (5) Prot. Appeal l. 2. p. 105. This question of Transubstantiation being of so great consequence that if it be defensible Protestants must stand chargeable of Heresie but it may be confuted the Romanists must necessarily be condemned of Idolatrie That therfore we both think it our bounden dutie to consult more exactly with the Senat of Antiquitie which I wil now only performe from the free grants confessions of D. Morton's owne Brethren And so to begin with S. Gregorie D. Humfrey (6) Iesuit parr 2. rat 5 p. 627. speaking of him and S. Augustin demandeth what Gregorie and Augustin brought into the English Church To which himself answereth that They brought with manie other Catholick poynts by him there recited Transubstantiation To arise to S. Chrysostome the Centurists (7) Cent. 5. col 517. confesse that he seemeth to teach Transubstantiation And Musculus (8) Loc. com p 336. reciteth and reproueth a Saying of S. Chrysostom's for the Real presence The Centurists (9) Cent. 4. c 10 col 985 295. likewise affirme that Eusebius Emissenus did speak vnprofitably of Transubstantiation And 10) Antony de Adamo in his Anatomy of the Masse f. 222 And see Cent 4. c. 4. col 295. Oecolamp lib. Epist p. 756. VadiaÌ„ de Euchar. Aphor. l. 5. p. 150 151 many Protestant Writers do greatly reproue the Bookes of Sacraments truly ascribed to S. Ambrose for affirming the opinion of Christs bodilie Presence in the Sacrament Insomuch that the Centurists (11) Cent 4. c. 4. col 295 charge S. Ambrose for not writing wel of Transubstantiation and Application for the dead In this respect also Peter Martyr (12) In de fens obiect Gardin p 4. p. 124. professeth to dislike the iudgement of S. Cyril And (13) In his Epistles annexed to his Common Places ep to Beza p. 106. p. 98 further annexeth I wil not so easily subscribe to Cyril who affirmeth such a Communion as thereby euen the Substance of the Flesh and Bloud of Christ first is ioyned to the blessing for so he calleth the holie bread c. Insomuch as in his second Alphabetical Table at the word Heresie is set downe Heresie of Cyril touching our Communion
recorded by (25) Libro de Passione Imaginis Christi And although some doubt be made vvhether this book be made by S. Athanasius yet it is cited as a most ancient historie by the seauenth Synod Act. 4. S. Athanasius of a certaine holie Image of Christ our Sauiour left in a house where a Christian had inhabited a litle before and at his remoual had forgot the same which the Iewes finding in derision of Christ Crucifyed spit vpon it buffeted it with their hands nayled the hands and feet vpon a Crosse offred it vineger mingled with gaul crowned it with a crowne of thornes strock the head therof with a reed and at the last pearced the right side therof with a lance from whence forthwith issued out water and bloud Which the Iewes perceiuing caused a vessel to be set vnder which presently was filled But they remouing it into theyr Synagogue intending therby to offer the greatest disgrace to Christ our Lord assembled thither al the disease and infirme which they could find which annoynting therwith there were cured the Sick of the palsie the blind the lame the deaf the dumbe the leapers and others Which the Iewes themselues seeing beleeued in Christ our Lord and went vnto the Catholick Church in that Cittie where prostrating themselues at the feet of the Metropolitan Bishop confessed their Sinnes and related al the Historie passed Wherupon the Bishop caused the Christian who had inhabited the house before to be brought vnto him and enquiring of him how he came to the Image he answered Nicodemus who came to Iesus by night made it with his owne hands and dying gaue it to Gamaliel who dying left it to Iames and Iames to Symeon and Symeon to Zachaeus and so by theyr Successours it continued in Hierusalem vntil two yeares before the Subuersion therof by Titus and Vespasian When the Christians admonished by the holie-Ghost left the cittie and comming into Syria they brought with them al things which belonged to the worship of Religion At which time the Image being brought amongst other things which concerned the Church remayned vntil this day in Syria which I receauing from my Parents departing this life haue vntil this time possessed by right of inheritance The Bishop hearing this was verie ioyful and instructing the Iewes in the Christian Doctrine after three dayes fast baptised them al and at their intreatie consecrated their Synagogue into a church in honour of the Sauiour of the world Afterwardes consulting what to doe with the sacred liquour of water and Bloud in the vessel resolued to send the same in bottles of glasse made of purpose to al churches through Asia Africa and Europe Exacting this of them that euerie yeare vpon the ninth of Nouember the like Solemnitie should be vsed as vpon the dayes of Christmas and Easter This sayth S. Athanasius is the true and verie credible Historie of the bloud of the side of our Sauiour which issued out of his holie Image which was crucifyed in Syria in the citie Berithus Here wil I leaue our Protestants condemning S. Athanasius of Credulitie and Superstitious Papistrie Now to proceed Functius confesseth that (26) Lib. 7. commentariorum in praeced chron fol. 6. Anno 494. Xenaias was the first in the church that stirred vp warre against Images So quiet possession had they in the Church before that time (27) Exam. part 4 pa. 26. Chemnitius sayth In one and only Tertulian I haue obserued the historie of the Sheepheard calling and seeking his wandring sheep to be paynted and grauen vpon holie Chalices In like sort sayth D. Beard (28) Retractiue from Romish Religion pag 401. Indeed we confesse that there was in these primitiue times of the church an historical vse of Images as may appeare by that Statue of our Sauiour at Cesarea mentioned by Eusebius and the pictures of Peter and Paul in the same Authour And of the good shepheard feeking the lost sheep paynted vpon the Chalices in Tertulian Another Protestant discoursing of the Religion taught and professed publickly by the Graecians and Abissines reciting amongst the rest their hauing (29) In his Catholick Tradictions pag. 212. 214. Pictures in their Churches and inclining and howing before the Images of Saints doth from thence conclude in these words (30) Ibid. pa. 216. It seemes that this is the greatest accusation which Protestants haue against the Churches of the East and Africa neuertheles c. the ancient Doctours which destroyed the Pagans Idolatrie haue approued it their deuotion did lead them vnto it c. So cleerly therfore may we conclude that our Catholick vsage of Pictures in placing them in Churches and reuerencing them doth most truly accord with the like practise and Deuotion of S. Gregorie Leo Paulinus Prudentius Austin Chrisostome Nicephorus Sozomene Athanasius Tertulian Lastantius Witnesses wherof are the Protestant writers the Centurists Osiander Chemnitius Peter Martyr Hospinian Functius Symonds Bale Fulk Parker Parkins Beard and Morton IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED BY PROTESTANTS that the Fathers of the Primitiue Chuch did specially honour and reuerence the holie Relicks of Martirs and other Saincts carying them in Processions and making Pilgrimages vnto them At which also manie Miracles were wrought CHAP. XV. AS it is to be supposed that such Hereâ—icks as deny the due worship and Inuocation of Saincts wil much more deny al reuerent respect or worship to be giuen to the Relicks of their dead Bodies So we may as confidently expect that al holie fathers who so confessedly before exhibited honour to the Blessed Saincts or Soules in Heauen wil likewise performe their answerable respect to their sacred Bodies vpon earth And to begin with S. Gregorie It is acknowledged by (1) In Act. Rom. Pontif. p. 44. c. M. Iohn Bale that Gregorie the great c. commanded Masses to be celebrated ouer the dead bodies of the Apostles And Carion (2) Chron. l. 4. p. 567. 568. auoucheth that He dedicated Churches to the bones and Ashes of Saincts (3) Cent. 6. Col. 381. The Centurie-writers charge him with Translation of Reliques (4) In Iesuit part 2. rat 5. p. 5. 627. And D. Humfrey reciting sundrie particular poynts of Catholick Doctrine which S. Gregorie and S. Austine brought into England amongst the rest doth number Relicks D. Fulk auoucheth that (5) Ag RheÌ„ Test in Apoc. 6. Gregorie liuing so neer the Reuelation of Antichrist it is no maruaile though he be more superstitious in Relicks And Againe (6) Ib. in 1. Tim. 4. Gregorie indeed willeth c. Altars to be built and Relicks to be layd-vp Gregorie indeed did send manie Superstitious tokens c. He sendeth a litle Key froÌ„ the bodie of S. Peter for his blessing in which is enclosed the iron of his chaynes c. Such was the practise and reuerence giuen to the Relicks of Saincts by S. Gregorie But to proceed S. Ambrose hauing made a godlie speech about the pious honouring of Martyrs Tombes the
ep ad Philippenses do but both of them affirme that He is guiltie of sinne who fasteth vpon Sunday The same is confessed by M. Carthwright (51) In Whit. Def. p. 99. who also with M. Midleton (52) In his Papistomastix p. 35. M. Parker (53) Against Symbol c. part 1. c. 4. p. 171. confesseth the same of Tertulian de Corona Militis c. 3. Yea M. Parker reciteth the seueral sayings to this purpose of Tertulian Ignatius Austin And M. Wilet 54) Synopsis controuers 9. q. 8 p. 384 sayth wee grant this opinion is verie ancient and that in Tertulians time it was receaued in manie Churches Thus then our Roman Church doth truly Symbolize with the Primitiue First in teaching that the fast of Lent is obligatorie and vnder sinne Secondly as also that certain meates are to be abstained from vpon certaine dayes and times Thirdly for the contrarie Doctrine wherof the Fathers censured Aerius for an Heretick Fourthly and with him Eustachius for their Sundayes fast Fiftly Catholicks being confessedly cleared from the imputed Heresies of Montanus Marcion Tatianus Now the Fathers acknowledged and reproued by Protestants for our foresayd Doctrine of fasting are S. Gregorie Ambrose Austin Hierom Theophilus Maximus Taurinensis Cyril Epiphanius Nyssene Origen Calixtus Tertulian Clemens Alexandrinus Egesippus Iosephus Ignatius Hermes al the Fathers of the Fourth Carthage Councel The Protestants citing them are The Centurists Melancthon Pantaleon Danaeus Aretius Chemnitius Hamelmannus Schultetus Schrederus Caluin Osiander Symondes Bale Trigge Carthwright Fulk Field Hooker Iacob Welch Midleton Parker Willet Morton Whiteguift Whitaker It is admitted by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church expresly taught our Catholick Doctrine concerning freewil CHAPTER XX. WHeras it is generally taught by Catholicks (1) See Bellarmine in his boo 1. s de Gratia libero Arbit that man euen after the fal of Adam hath freewil and libertie not only in actions natural or ciuil but likewise in moral and supernatural Gods Grace concurring Directly to the contrarie the learnedst Protestants (2) Caluin Inst l. 1. art 16. §. 8 l. 2. c. 4. §. 6. And see 3. §. 7. teach that man in the state of Nature now corrupted is not endowed with Freewil in anie action natural ciuil moral or supernatural The Primitiue Church is so wholy Roman Catholick in this poynt of Faith concerning Freewil as that the same is most plentifully confessed by manie Protestants Luke Osiander (3) Cent. 6. p. 288. speaking of S. Gregorie affirmeth that In manie articles he was fowlly Popishly deceaued for he attributed ouermuch to Freewil c. And the Centurie-writers (4) Cent 6. c. 10. col 748. repeating manie preteÌ„ded errours of his amongst the rest doe number Freewil But the Centurists (5) Cent. 4. col 291. proceed further for speaking of the Fourth Age they confesse in general that Almost al the Fathers of this Age speake confusedly of Freewil c. And contrarie to the manifest testimonies of holie Scripture And immediatly after they doe there recite and reiect the particular Sayings of Lactantius Athanasius Basil Nazianzene Epiphanius Hierom c. saying They were al deceaued al in darknes al washed about the doctrine of Man's Freewil Beza [6) In his Nou. Test in Praef. ad Principem Condensem discoursing of the times of Austin Chrysostom and Cyprian affirmeth that then was in vse the opinion of Freewil Caluin affirmeth in general that The (7) Inst l. 2 c. 2. §. 4. Grecians aboue others and amongst them Chrysostom notably exceed measure in extolling the facultie of man's wil. And agayne (8) Inst l. 2. c. 1. §. 10. It is necessarie that be reiected which is so often repeated by Chrysostome Quem trahit volentem trahit whom he draweth he draweth willing Yea the famous Councel of Neece was so cleer for Freewil that our Puritans spare not to say (9) A brief Discouery of vntruths in D. BaÌ„crofts serm p. 21. We must needs confesse that not only this gouernment of the Church but also manie other poynts of greatest waight in Religion fel to decay long before the Councel of Neece c. Man's Freewil abilitie to fulfil the Law of God c. was winked at or buryed c. at the time of the Councel of Neece So that if this Argument taken from the Councel of Neece be good c. it is also powreful to ouerthrow the mayne poynt of our Iustification by Faith c. The Centurie-writers (10) Cent 3. col 247. arise yet higher affirming that S. Cyprian is euerie where a vehement defender of Freewil And againe (11) Cent. 3. col 77. The same thinketh Cyprian l. 3. ep 3. Man sayth he left to his owne libertie and placed in his owne power either desireth death to himself or life And they recite reiect suÌ„drie other of his like sayings which sayings also are confessed and reiected by D. Humfrey (12) In his Iesuit part 2. p. 540. It is likewise 13) Cent. 3. col 77. confessed that Origen hom 9. in Numeros thinketh that our wil can choose good things that it may be a vessel to honour or euil and earthlie things that it may be a vessel to reproach Yea they further alleage and reiect manie other of his like Sayings And els where 14) Cent. 3. col 2â—8 they reproue Origen herein and al the Doctours of the then precedent Age. Yea speaking of Tertulian Origen Cyprian and Methodius their modest Censure is that 15) Cent. 3. c. 4. p. 77. They do abuse the Scriptures intollerably for the maintenance thereof And as for Tertulian they 16) Cent. 3. col 240. acknowledge that he In manie and large Sentences attributeth Frewil to man euen after the corruption of Nature by Adams fal And in 17) Cent. 3. col 77. another place they reiect Tertulians sundrie testimonies of Frewil But Hamalmannus 18) De Traditionibus l. 2. c. 7. col 93. confesseth that Tertulian and Ireneus with manie followers defend Freewil c. Yea Schultetus 19) Medulla Theol. Patrum p. 369. 304. 466. 151. 105. 98. 48. 66. 73. 40. And see Cent. 2. c. 4. col 58. 59. And Cent. 3. c. 4. col 77. 78. 48. for the selfe same Doctrine of Freewil reproueth of errour Cyprian Theophilus Tertulian Origen Clemens Alexandrinus Iustin Ireneus Athenagoras Tatianus c. And the Centurie-writers 20) Cent. 2. c. 10 col 221. And see col 58. 43. And Humfrey in Iesuit part 2. p. 527. And Osiand cent 2. l. 4. p. 84. confesse that Ireneus admitteh Freewil euen in spiritual actions And that Ireneus 21) Cent. 2. c. 4. p. 53. disputes not dissinctly and wresteth the speeches of Christ and of S. Paul in fauour of Freewil saying that there is Freewil also in faith and beleef But these things say he Centurists are spaken grossly by
Ireneus and are repugnant to the Scriptures In like sort Osiander 22) Cent. 2. p. 5. 6. And see the Centurists Cent. 2. col 207. reproueth Iustin saying Iustine extolled too much the libertie of mans Wil in obseruing the Commandments of God And it is granted 23) Cent. 2. c. 4. col 59. And see Caluin Inst l. 2 c. 2 §. 4. that Clemens euerie where defendeth Freewil so that it may appeare say they that not only al the Doctours of that Age were in such darknes but also that the same after increased in the later Doctours D. Abbots 24) In defence of the Reformed Catholick part 1. p. 114. speaking of the booke of Hermes entituled Pastor and some others forged according to his opinion in the Apostles times sayth The poyson which Satan had conueyed into such counterfaite books was receiued as wholesome food and sundrie errours and superstitious fancies of vowed Virginitie and Prayer for the dead of Freewil of Inuocation of Saincts of Antichrist and the Assumption of Marie and such like by litle and litle got footing in the Church And here was indeed sayth Abbot the true beginning of manie doctrines of Poperie c. The Centurists 25) Cent. 2. c. 4. 4 coâ— 58. speaking of the times next after the Apostles doe acknowledge That almost no poynt of Doctrine began so soon to be obscured as this of Freewil Yea it is confessed 26) So say the Puritanes cyted in D. Bancrostes Sermon p. 23. that the Protestants know that euer since the Apostles time in a manner it flourished euerie where vntil Martin Luther took the sword in hand against it A true so euident that D. Humfrey 27) Iesuit part 2. p. 530. thinketh It may not be denyed but that Ireneus Clemens and others quos vocant Apostolicos whom they cal Apostolical in respect of the time in which they liued haue in their writings the opinions of Freewil c. Yea sayth M. Caluin 28) Instit l. 2. c. 2. § 9. Al Ecclesiastical Writers excepting Augustin haue written so ambiguously and differently in this matter of Freewil that nothing certain can be gathered from their wrytings And they were ouer ful in extolling Freewil Lastly D. Whiteguift 29) In his Defence against the Reply of Carthwright p. 472. 473. discoursing of Doctrine taught in anie Age since the Apostles time affirmeth without anie other exception of Age or Father that to vse his words almost 30) Ibid. p. 473. And see the lyke in Whitak de Eccl. Con. Bellar. Controu 2. p. 299. al the Bishops and learned Writers of the Greek Church and Latin also for the most part were spotted with doctrines of Freewil of Merit of Inuocation of Saincts and such like And the same also almost in the same words is confessed by D. Couel saying 30) In his Exam. c. 9. p. 120. Diuers both of the Greek and Latin Church were spotted with errours about Freewil Merits Inuocation of Saincts c. Yea the ancient Iewes did so firmely beleeue our Doctrine of Freewil that to omit the 31) c. 15. 12. 15. 16. 17. cleerest words of Ecclesiasticus which D. Whitakers had no other wayes 32) Resp ad Camp Rat. 1. p. 15. to euade but by denying the sayd booke to be Canonical Scripture D. Fulk tearmeth 33) Defence of the Eng. Transl p. 320. The Iewish Rabbins Patrons of Freewil which D. Morton 34) Prot. Appeal l. 2. p. 371. iustifyeth and further sayth 35) Ibid. p. 370. What if it be confessed that some Rabbins maintayned the libertie of mans Wil as Rabbi Moses did Yea M. Hal chargeth the Pharisees 36) Pharisaisme p. 50. with Freewil and Merit which is more then either Christ or his Apostles did who yet in other respects spared not to discouer their true Errours Wel then our Catholick Doctrine of Freewil is the Primitiue Doctrine taught by S. Gregorie Hierome Epiphanius Nazianzene Basil the Councel of Nice Chrysostome Athanasius Lactantius Cyprian Origen Tertulian Theophilus Iustine Athenagoras Tatianus Clemens Alexand. Ireneus Hermes and by al the Fathers since the Apostles vntil Luthers time Our strongest witnesses herof are the Protestant Writers The Centurists Beza Osiander Hamelmannus Schultetus Calum Humfrey Abbot Hal Morton Whiteguift Fulk and Whitaker Jt is graunted by Protestants that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church taught not only Faith but likewise Good works truly to iustify And that the sayd works are meritorious of Grace and Glorie CHAP. XXI COncerning Good-works It is the general (1) Se Bellarmin De Iustificatione l. 1. 4. 5. and receiued doctrine of the Roman Church First that the works of the iust are truly good and not of their owne nature sinne Secondly that not only Faith but likewise good works doe truly iustifie a man obtaine remission of sinnes Thirdly that the same good works do truly merit or deserue Grace in this world and glorie in the next Directly 2) Luther in Assert art 31. 32. 36. Caluin Instit l. 3. c. â—◠§ 4. and c. 41. §. 9. c. 19. §. 2. 4. 7. c. 15. § 2. contrarie to al the forsayd poynts concerning Good-works is the ordinarie doctrine of our new Protestants First affirming that the best works of the iust are of their owne natures deadlie sinne Sâ—condly that only Faith doth iustify Thirdly and lastly that works do neither merit Grace nor glorie To come now to the doctrine and Faith of the Primitiue Church The 3) Cenâ— 6. c. 10. col 748. Centurists making a Catalogue of S. Gregories pretended errours amongst the rest number his Errour of good workes and Iustification And 4) Cent. 6. p. 288. Osiander much reproueth him for that he attributeth ouer much to good works S. Augustin is reiected by 5) In Confess Wittemb Brentius for that the taught Affiance in mans merits towards remission of Sinnes The 6) Harmony of Confess in English sec 16. p. 509. Diuines of Wittemberg affirme that These reasons which Augustin bringeth for his opinion of Purgatorie doe seem to leane to this foundation That we obtaine remission of our sinnes and life not only for Christ his sake through Faith but also for the merits of our works And for the same doctrine of Merit of works he is further reprehended by 7) Cent. 4. p. 520. Osiander the 8) Cent. 5. col 507. 1133. Centurists 9) Instit l. 3. c. 11. § 15. Caluin 10) l. 1. Ep. p. 290 in Consil Theol. p. 240. And see Colloq Altemberg fol. 307. Field of the Church l. 3. c. 42 p. 170. Melancthon and D. Field So likewise the 11) Cent. 5. col 1178. Centurie-writers speaking of S. Chrysostom affirme that Chrysostom handleth impurely the doctrine of Iustification and attributeth merit to works They likewise say of Prosper 12) Cent. 5. c. 10. col 1363. that he retayned not a few freckles of his Age Such an
Fathers in particular pronounceth of them in general thus 40) In Col. Conuiual c. De Patribus Ecclesiae See ye what darknes there is in the Fathers writings concerning Faith for when that Article of the Iustification of men is couered with darknes it can by no meanes be that greater errours he auoyded Bullinger doth 41) In Apoc. Serm. 87. fol. 270. acknowledge that The doctrine of Merits satisfaction and Iustification of works did incontinently after the Apostles time lay their first foundations Caluin affirmeth in general that 42) Inst l. 3. c. 25. §. 2. The ancient Writers of the Church vsing euerie where the word Merit gaue occasion of errour to posteritie therby Adde lastly that D. Whiteguift 43) In his Def. against the Reply of Carthw p. 472. 473. treating of Doctrine taught in anie Age since the Apostles time affirmeth without al other exception either of Age or Father that Almost al the Bishops and learned Writers of the Greek Church and Latin also for the most part were spotted with doctrines of Freewil of Merits c. And the same is likewise taught by 44) De Eccl. cont Bellar. p. 299. D. Whitakers Now concerning the ancient Iewes The Books of 45) c. 12 9. 4.10 Tobie and Ecclesiasticus 46) c. 3. 33. are so pregnant for the Merit of works that sundrie Protestants say therof 47) Minist of Lincolne Dioces in their Abridgment p. 76. The two places of Tobie and Ecclesiasticus tend dangerously to the Iustifying of the Merit of Almes-deeds And others writing against the booke of Homilies say 48) â—ilenced Ministers in the 2. Part of Def. p. 164. The book of Homilies whereto we are required to subscribe c. expoundes Tobie saying that Almes is profitable to purge the soule from the spots of sinne alleaging these words of Tobie 4.10 and 12.19 c. and out of Ecclesiasticus c. Yea they further say This 49) Ib. p. 166. place of Tobie were it Canonical c. is verie pregnant for the Merit of works and as strong for it as the Scriptures are for the merit of Christ Buxdorfius also writeth of the Rabbins that 50) Synagog Iudaica p. 23. They perswade themselues that they may satisfy for their sinnes by doing pennance vpon their skinnes and that they may easily merit eternal life by keeping of the Commandments and Good works And the same also is acknowledged in them by 51) Pharisaisme p. 13. 50. M. Hal. I may then conclude that the Fathers of the Primitiue Church are our firmest Patrons for our Catholick Doctrine concerning Good-works confessedly teaching First that Good-works do truly iustify Secondly Meriting Grace and Remission of sinnes in this life and eternal glorie in the next For which verie doctrine the Fathers acknowledged by Protestants are S. Gregorie Chrysostom Augustin Prosper Ambrose Hierom Nyssene Nazianzene Hilarie Ephrem Cyprian Origen Tertulian Theophilus Lactantius Iustin Clemens Alex. Ireneus Hermes Ignatius and the ancient beleeuing Iewes The Protestant Writers producing and charging the forsayd Fathers are Luther the Centurists Brentius the Diuines of Wittemberg Osiander Caluin Melancthon Chemnitius Winkilmamus Schultetus Bullinger Buxdorfeus Wotton Whitaker Humfrey Couel and Whiteguift It is acknowledged by Protestants that the Ceremonies now vsed by the Roman Church in the ministring of seruice or Sacrifice as also of the Sacraments were formerlie vsed by the Bishops Priests and Fathers of the Primitiue Church CHAP. XXII HAuing thus passed through so manie particular Controuersies of greatest weight and finding in al of them a perfect agreement and sweetest harmonie between the ancient most holie and Primitiue Church and the present Roman Catholick Church and this by no weaker proofes or euidences then the free grants Confessions and acknowledgments of our sworne and professed Aduersaries I wil now for my Conclusion in this kind only examen one poynt further which being not purely Doctrinal but most sensible and external wil therby not only prooue most accommodate to the sense and capacitie of the meanest Reader but withal wil most euidently declare and make manifest the outward gracious and beautiful face of Christian Religion practised by the ancient learned and holie Bishops Doctours and people of the Primitiue Church Nothing is better knowne either to those of greater yeares who as yet may wel remember the Ecclesiastical rites and Customes of our owne kingdome or to others more moderne who haue trauailed forraine Nations then the external Ceremonies vsed in Material Churches in Celebration of Seruice and Administration of the most holie Sacraments For who knoweth not that when Catholick Churches are erected they are specially consecrated and dedicated either to Christ or some of his Saincts That in them are seueral Chancels and Vestries as also Altars Candles Reliques and Images that there are truly Priests who offer daily external Sacrifice at the Altar Whose Vestments and vessels are specially hallowed who likewise obserue Canonical houres saying some prayers in Secret others with a loud voice sometimes giuing the people their benediction and burning Incense at the Altar In the Church likewise there is a Font specially hallowed for the administration of Baptisme which is holden necessarie to Saluation and the same is ministred with the Signe of the Crosse with holie Oyles and sundrie other Ceremonies hereafter specifyed And to omit sundrie other In the Church is blessed by the Priest Holiewater Holie-bread Candles Ashes c. I need not describe the naked walles of Protestants Churches or the bare black coates of their wedded Ministers both of them deuoyd of al grace ornament puritie and state duly befitting places and persons Ecclesiastical And therfore I hasten to the confessed practise of the Primitiue Church Wherein I first find that when Material Churches were first built they were specially hallowed by the Bishop so much as S. Gregorie and S. Austin are reproued by D. Humfrey 1) In Iesuit part 2. rat 5. p. 5. 627. for bringing into England the new Consecration of Churches And the 2) Cent. 6. col 364. 365. Centurie-writers do charge S. Gregorie out of his owne writings with Consecration of Churches D. Morton affirmeth that he vsed 3) Prot. Appeal l. 1. p. 53. Superstitious manner of Consecration of Churches Yea the 4) Cent. 4. col 408. further confesse that Athanasius in his Apologie to Constantin plainly sheweth that Christians did not assemble togeather in Churches not consecrated And that in the Fourth Age the Fathers vsed 5) Cent. 4. col 497. Sumptuous Churches consecrated and Superstitious Insolencie in celebrating of Masse appointed to be sayd in no places but such as were hallowed by a Bishop 6) Cent. 4. col 497. Yea they reprooue Constantin himselfe for that say they concerning Consecration of Churches new built proud adorning of them and other Superstitious things the greatest part Constantine inuented and spread abrode in many Churches And wheras Sozomene hist l. 1. c. 8.
Iouinian can disproue And the same is confessed in Iouinian 65) Chron. p. 32. and cent 5. col 5â—8 by Pantaleon and the Centurists And yet D. Beard acknowledgeth that S. Austin doth preferre Virginitie before Marriage as a greater good But Luther 66) Tom. 5 Wittemb in 1. Cor. c. 7. fol. 107. much exceedeth Iouinian herein saying I do conclude that matrimonie is as gold and the spiritual state of single life is as dung In which absurditie and impuritie he is also defended by 67) Cont. Camp Rat. 8. p. 151. D. Whitaker The single life of Priests was impugned by Vigilantius whom therefore 68) Cont. Vigil c. 1. S. Hierome reproueth in these words What do the Churches of the East of Aegypt and the Sea Apostolick who take Clergie-men either such as are Virgins or continent or if they haue wiues yet cease to be as husband Agreably hereunto D. Fulk 69) Answ to a Count Cath. p. 45. see Hier. l. 1. cont Iouinis c. 14 and 19. and Apol. ad Pamachius c. 8. Epiph. her 59. confesseth that Iouinian also was condemned for that he taught that such as could not containe though they had vowed Virginitie should neuerthelesse be married And D. Morton confesseth that a) Appeal p. 604. Vigilantius and Iouinian are condemned by S. Hierome for impugning the vnmarried life of Priests The impugning of prescribed Fasts was condemned in Aerius of whom confesseth D. Fulk that he taught that fasting-dayes are not to be obserued D. Feild 17 sayth He disliked set Fasts c. He was iustly condemned Osiander 72) cent 4. p. 434. reporteth him to say that set Fasts are not to be obserued c. According to libertie a man is to fast when he wil. This errour was reproued in Aerius by S. Austin 73) her 53. Epiphan her 75. and S. Epiphanius And S. Austin 74) her 82. reporteth Iouinian to say Fasts 70) answer to a Count. Cath. p. 44. 45. or abstinence from certaine meates do nothing profit Yea he 75) de Eccl. dog c. 68. auoucheth further that to beeleeue that such as abstaine from wine and flesh haue no greater merit is not the part of a Christian but of a Iouinian which Censure of S. Austin is confessed in him by Chemnitius 71) of the Church l. 3. p. 138. 76) Exam. part 4. p. 142. And whereas Protestants keepe their strictest Fasts vpon Sundayes S. Epiphanius 77) her 75. witnesseth that the Aerians desired rather to fast vpon Sunday to eat vpon Wednesday and Friday And S. Austin 78) Ep. 86. affirmeth that to fast on the Lords day is a great offence especially since the detestable Heresie of the Manichees c. who appoint vnto their hearers this day as lawful to be fasted vpon This saying of S. Austin is alleaged by D. Whitguift 79) Defen p. 502. and cent 4. col 445. 401. and the Centurists and the like of S. Ambrose by 80) Against Symbo part 2. p. 38. M. Parker From these few premisses I may inferre first that the Protestants impugning Monkes and Monastical life are condemned in the Hereticks Circumcellians Petilianus and Vigilantius by S. Austin and S. Hierome Secondly their impugning of voluntarie pouerty is condemned in Vigilantius by S. Hierome Thirdly their equalling of marriage with Virginitie was condemned in Iouinian by the same S. Hierome Fourthly their impugning the vnmaried life of Priests was condemned in Vigilantius also by S. Hierome Fiftly their denyal of set Fasts and abstinence from certaine meats is condemned in Aerius by S Austin and S. Epiphanius and in Iouinian by S. Austin Lastly our Protestants Sunday-fast was condemned in the Manichees by S. Austin and in the Arians by S. Epiphanius So perfect harmonye we euer finde between the ancient Hereticks Vigilantius Petilianus Iouinian Aerius and the Manichees and our Moderne Protestants And between the ancient Doctours S. Austin S. Hierome S. Epiphanius and the present Roman Church THAT THE FATHERS CONDEMNED in ancient Hereticks the opinions of Protestants concerning Free-wil Faith Good works the Commandments sinne and the knowledge and Death of Christ CHAPTER V. BVT now to come to the cheifest articles of mans Freewil Faith good workes and the possibilitie of the Commandments sinne and the like The denyal of Freewil was condemned in the Manichees by S. Hierome 81) in ProeÌ„ lib. cont Pelagianos fin saying it is proper to the Manichees to condemne mans nature and to take away Freewil and the assistance of God of whom also sayth S. Austine 82) de fide cont Manich c. 9. The Manichees bark against these with wonted blindenes and when they are conuinced that Nature is not an euil thing and that it is in the power of man to do wel or euil they say that the soule hath not Freewil and they see not their blindnes Herevpon it is that Hemingius 83) de vniuersali gratia p. 109. chargeth his other Protestant Brethren denying Freewil with the doctrine of the Manichees and the Stoicks And wheras some answer hereunto that the Manichees condemned Nature which Protestants do not we reply againe that we do not charge them therwith but only with the denial of Freewil and Gods grace for the denial wherof the Manichees were condemned and though it were vpon other grounds then Protestants doe yet that excuseth not since the very denial of Freewil was condemned in them by the Fathers As likewise the denial of any article of Faith vpon what reason or ground soeuer it be is notwithstanding to be condemned for errour The pretended sufficiencie of onlie Faith was condemned in Eunomius by S. Austin 84) her 54. who reporteth Eunomius to haue taught That the committing of anie sinnes whatsoeuer and continuance in them would nothing hurt a man if he was partaker of that Faith wich was taught by him Agreably to whom sayth D. Whitaker 85) de Eccl. p. 301. we affirme that if one haue an act of Faith sinnes do not hurt him this Luther affirmed and this we al say The denial in general of the diuersitie of merits was condemned in Iouinian by S. Austin 86) de Tem. ser 191. saying We condemne the errour of Iouinian who sayd there Was no difference of merits in the world to come And S. Ambrose 87) Conc. Telense Rescript Ambrosij aliorum ad Siricium PapaÌ„ ibid. and others tearme it A rude houling c. to confound al things promiscuously c. and to take away the degrees of different merits The denyal of the possibilitie of keeping the Commandments was condemned in certaine Hereticks by S. Hierome 88) In expl symb ad Damas saying We accurse the blasphemie of them who say that anie thing impossible is commanded by God to man And the same words vseth S. Austin 89) De tem ser 191. in so much that the Protestant Hoffman rather accurseth S. Hierome saying 90) CoÌ„ment
the Emperour doth nothing proue any Innouation in the Roman Church but rather to the contrarie doth plainly shew his vnion and Communion therewith in matters of faith and Religion In like sort where he obiecteth that S. Bernard freely noted diuers Corruptions then comming in it is so vnprobable yea so grossely vntrue as that to the contrarie (90) L. 2. Cont. Dur. p 154. Fulk against Rhem. Test f. 133. D. Whitaker and D. Fulk both of them confesse that he taught the Popes Supremacie and D. Whitaker (91) Ad Rat. Camp rat 7. p. 105. aknowledgeth that he was of our Church (92) In specul Eccl. p. 23. Gomarus calleth him our S. Bernard The Centurists affirme that he was 93) â—ent 12. c. 10. col 1637. a most earnest Defender of the Sea of Antichrist Bel (94) Challenge c. p. 148. tearmeth him Bernard the Popes deare Monk and reuerend Abbot Yea the Centurists further report That he sayd 95) Cent. 12. col 1939. to the Duke of Aquitaine whatsoeuer is out of the Roman Church by the Iudgement of God is certainly to perish euen as those things which were out of the Ark were drowned in the diluge As also he that persecuteth the Pope of Rome persecuteth the Sonne of God Now by this al of it confessed by sundrie and much more learned Protestants then M. White it more then cleerly appeareth that S. Bernard was no fit witnes to be produced against the Roman Church nor that he himself did differ in anie one point of Faith from her much lesse did note anie pretended corruption of Faith comming in And as for the feast of the Conception or the Doctrine concerning the Virgin Maries freedome from original sinne it is not yet to this day defined by the Church as a matter of Faith But where he further vrgeth that S. Bernaâ—d was against Merits Iustificatâ—on by works Freewil keeping the Law Seauen Sacraments and vncertantie of our Saluation and the Popes greatnes in Temporalities it is al of it most vntrue as himself might haue plainly shewed if he had been pleased to haue set downe the answers out of Cardinal Bellarmine as he was to haue his obiections In like sorte that which he obiecteth concerning Arnulph pertaineth only to matter of life and manners not to Faith or doctrine and therefore it maketh nothing to proue anie Innouation or change in our present Roman Religion As also though as then one preached in Antwerp against the Real Presence yet I haue before freed our Church from al Innouation therein in far more ancient times And as for Honorius his noting the bringing in of Wafers into the Sacrament in this Age it is so vntrue that M. Cartwright (96) See before l. 2. c. 8. confesseth that it was brought in by Pope Alexander who liued Anno 111. which is some thousand yeares before the time now obiected After 1150. to 1200. I name saith M. White the Emperour Frederick Barbarossa forbidding Appeales to Rome and the comming of Legats from Rome into Germanie c. But though the Emperour did this being as then at discord with the Pope yet his fact was so faultie as that he was thervpon and for other iniuries Excommunicated From which 97) Baron Anno 1160. num 31. 32. Anno 1168. num 60. after vpon his submission 98) Baron Anno 1177. num 22. and promise of obedience he was absolued and permitted to come to the Pope whose feet the Emperour kissed and bowing his head receiued reuerently his benediction And that the Roman Church as then made no Innouation concerning Appeales or sending of Legats it is most cleere by general practise allowance thereof in the purest times of the Primitiue Church proued at large 99) Before l. 2. c. 4. heretofore And as for Lincolniensis noting as then the Noueltie and Heresie of Friars M. White only barely saith it without al further proof yea though as then the Institution of Friars had been but new yet neither was it in anie thing Heretical nor proued anie Innouation in the Church in Faith and doctrine But to come to the Waldenses who according to D. White were dispersed ouer al this part of the world and in most substantial poynts resisted the Papacie c. as it is not denyed but that in some poynts they reuolted from the Roman Faith so haue I shewed 100) Before l. 1. c. 3. before that in sundrie other weighty Articles of Religion they agreed with Catholicks against Protestants And it is verie easie further to proue that indeed they beleeued sundrie grosse errours though M. White would make the world to think That the sayd errours were falsly imposed vpon them 103) Ibid. p. 729. 747. 760. For Illiricus himselfe 101) Catal. Test verit p 731. 745. 730. 732. testifyeth that they taught That Laymen and women might Consecrate the Sacrament and preach That Clergie men should haue no possessions or proprieties That 104) Ibid. p. 731. 743. married Persons mortally sinned who accompanied togeather without hope of Issue That neither Priest 105) Ibid. p. 760. 740. Osiand Cent. 9. 10. 11. p. 440. nor Ciuil Magistrat being guiltie of mortal sinne did enioy their dignitie or were to be obeyed And to omit many 106) Ibid. p. 734. others they went to the Catholick Churches dissembling and offered confessed and communicated dissemblingly And now must M. White either charge his owne Brother Illiricus to haue falsely imposed these errours vpon them or els must he confesse that these so dissembling and ignorant witnesses are altogeather insufficient to proue anie change in the Roman Church out of which themselues went out After 1200. 1200. to 1250. I name sayth M. White Almaricus a Doctour of Paris that was buâ—ned for withstanding Altars Images c. It is not denyed but that Almaricus was an Heretick falling from the Roman Church But yet I hope D. White wil be ashamed to clayme him for a Protestant for he was condemned first by the Vniuersitie of Paris after by Innocentius and a Synod at Rome for these propositions following (o) Cesarius Dial. l. 5 That there is no Resurrection of bodâ—es Secondly that there is no Paradise norhel Thirdly that the bodie of Christ is no more in the Sacrament after the words of Consecration then in a stone or horse Fourthly that God spake as much in Ouid as in Austin and other such to the number of 20. for which he was burned openly in Paris with certaine other blasphemous Hereticks against the Persons of the B. Trinitie sayth (p) Lib. 6. Hist Franc. and see Gers Tract 3. in Math. Aemilius li. 6. Hist Gal. Genebrad in Chro. Anno 1208. Gagninus Besides I haue (107) Before lib. 2. c. 14. 22. proued before that the foresayd Catholick poynts vrged to be denyed by Almaricus were yet al of them taught and beleeued by the Fathers of the Primitiue Church so that no
that the Church must be visible (15) Compend loc 24. p. 201. Gesnerus auoucheth that The external and visible Companie of those who are called Baptized and professe the name of Christ whereof Christ speaketh Math. 1.14 was neuer hid And a litle before he affirmeth that It can not be hid and be obscure (16) Serm. 4. fol. 90. M. Web likewise in his Sermons vpon the 2. Psalme inferreth the like from Math. 1.4 Crāmerus (17) Scholae Propheticae p. 381. teacheth that The State of the Church is painted out by similitude of a Mountaine whereby the Church is signified which neuer was nor can be hid but as a high Mountaine easily yeeldeth itself to be seen of al as Christ Math. 5.14 saith of a Cittie which placed vpon a Mountaine can not be hid These and sundrie other Protestants do not only defend the Churches Euer-visibilitie but they defend the same euen from the Scriptures themselues condemning the contrarie opinion of the Churches Inuisibilitie as contrarie to Scriptures and al ancient and moderne Writers From this so certaine and confessed a truth of the Churches Euer-visibilitie sundrie Protestants of special note do further inferre and teach the absolute necessitie of the Churches Euer-visibilitie to the remission of Sinnes and the Saluation of man plainly condemning to eternal damnation al such as liue and dye out of the visible Church of Christ To this end (18) Instit l. 4. c. 1. Sac. 4. Caluin writeth Because I intend to dispute of the visible Church let vs learne though with this one testimonie of our Mothers prayse how profitable yea how necessarie is the knowledge of her vnto vs seing there is no other entrance into life except she conceiue vs in her wombe except she bring vs forth except c. to conclude she defend vs vnder her custodie and gouernment vntil we dying c. Adde hereunto that out of her bosome no remission of sinnes is to be hoped for M. Parkins (19) Vol. 1. p. 308. teacheth that The Arke out of which al perished figured the Church out of which al are condemned c. out of the Militant Church there are no meanes of Saluation no preaching of the Word no Inuocation of Gods name no Sacraments and therefore no Saluation For this cause euerie man must be admonished euermore to ioyne himself to some particular Church c. D. Humfrey (20) Iesuit part 2. p. 242. cōfesseth that Secret aboades are not the Christian Conuocation c. because this Cōmunion of Saints is an open testification of Christianitie which open testification is necessarie to Saluation (21) De Ecclesia Milit. p. 36. 38. Molitox testifyeth that The inuisible Church of the Elect is latent in the visible Church and out of it can not be found as it is truly sayd out of the Church to wit the visible Church there is no Saluation c. Keckermanus (22) System Theolog. p. 408. vrgeth that The Church of the new Testament by reason of her Markes and external forme must alwayes be sensible and visible that so other Nations who are yet out of the Church may know to what Church they ought to adhere c. (23) Meth. Theolog. p. 552. Hiperius thus iustly demandeth Verily except these Signes were and that the true Church could be apprehended by Senses how could a man know to what Companie he should adhere for the obtayning of Saluation (24) Of the Church l. 1. c. 1. p. 3. Philip Mornay auoucheth that Into the visible Church al must retire themselues in this world that wil be gathered in the inuisible Church in the world to come Al this supposeth the necessarie visibilitie of the Church in al Ages seing in al Ages God hath prouided sufficient meanes for man's Saluation Yea it further conuinceth that supposing the Church could be inuisible at anie time that as then al the Professours and members therof dying should incurre damnation seing according to the truth and the iudgement of so manie Protestants out of the visible Church there is no Saluation To apply then this so certaine and necessarie Doctrine to the Roman and Protestant Church I haue formerly proued the Inuisibilitie of the Protestant Church in al Ages before Luther As namely euen at Luthers first appearing (25) See before l. 3. c. 1. by the testimonies of Luther himself of Morgēsterne Rhegius Miluius Bucer Caluin Camierus Dent Brightman Whitaker and Iewel as also in al Ages for these last 1000. yeares by the (26) See aboue l. 3. c. 1 confessions of D. Fulk Parkins Bale Bramlerus Simon de Voyon Powel and others And that it was no lesse inuisible during the time of the Primitiue Church (27) See before l. 3. c. 1. it is formerly acknowledged by M. Brightman Nappeir Carthwright Beza Fulk Cario Francus others Now to the contrarie the cleerest visibilitie of our Roman Church during al Ages since Christ is most plentifully testifyed and first for these last 1000. yeares (28) See before l. 1. c. 2. by Powel Symon de Voyon Parkins Fulk Danaus Whitaker Dowaham Wotton Hospinian and manie others And for the first 600. yeares (29) See before l. 1. c. 5. by Broccard Brightman Leigh Napper Winckelmanus Danaus Fulk Raynolds Caluin Zanchius Whitaker Ridley Iewel Bunnie Morton Parker Francus Field and seueral others So that my Conclusion may truly be that seing according to plaine Scriptures and the answerable acknowledgemēts of Protestant Writers the Church of Christ must euer continue visible in al Ages and times which the Roman Church hath euer the Protestant neuer performed that therefore not the Protestant but the Catholick Roman Church is the only true Church of Christ described in the Scriptures The third Proof from sacred Scriptures in Confirmation of the Roman Church and Confutation of the Protestant is taken from the Churches Pastours which must euer continue with lawful Calling Succession and with Administration of Word and Sacraments CHAPTER IIII. THE sacred Scriptures do plentifully further shew the necessarie Being Continuance Calling and Succession of Ecclesiastical Pastours In which respect God himself thus promiseth to his Church (1) Esay 59 2◠My Spirit which is vpon thee and the words which I haue put in thy mouth shal not depart out of thy mouth nor out of the mouth of thy seed nor out of the mouth of thy seeds seed from henceforth for euer As also (2) Ps 45.16 In steed of fathers children shal be borne to thee thou shalt make them Princes through al the earth (3) Esa 62.6 And vpon thy walles Ierusalem I haue appoynted watchmen al the day and al the night for euer they shal not hold their peace S. Paule (4) Ephes 4.11.12 assureth vs that our Sauiour hath placed Pastours to continue in his Church to the Consummation of Saincts til we al meet in vnitie of Faith that is for euer according to the exposition hereof by D.
iure diuino Yea M. Mason himself acknowledgeth and that from M. Fox that amongst (54) Consecration of the Bishops in England p. 264 And see Fox Act. Mon. Vol. 2. p. 1295. The Articles sent by Queen Marie to Bishop Bonner one was this Item Touching such persons as were heretofore promoted to anie Orders after the new sort and fashion of Orders Considering they were not ordered in verie deed the Bishop of the Diocesse finding otherwise sufficiencie and abilitie in these men may supply that thing which wanted in them before and then according to his discretion admit them to Minister Here though M. Mason would gladly inforce a different Glosse yet the words are most plaine that Queen Marie and the Church in her time censured such as were promoted to anie Orders after the new sort and fashion of Protestant Orders in K Edwards time were not ordered in verie deed So that stil it deserueth further search whence our present English Clergie as also other forraine Ministers haue obtayned true power and authoritie to preach administer Sacraments And as for Forainers as the Ministers in Germanie Denmark Holland the rest they are so cleerely and confessedly destitute of al true Ordination that M. Mason acknowledgeth that (55) Consec of Engl. Bish. Ep. Dedic wheras other Reformed Churches were constrained by necessitie to admit extraordinarie Fathers that is to receaue ordination from Presbiters or Ministers rather then to suffer the fabrick of the Lord Iesus to be dissolued The Church of England had alwayes Bishops to conferre Sacred Orders according to the ordinarie and most warrantable Custome of the Church of Christ So that no Protestant Ministers in the world haue anie ordinarie Calling or Ordination by Bishops but only the Ministers of England who yet beg and deriue al that which they haue from their imagined Antichrist himself as now shal be shewed Some Protestants therfore teach that they haue their Calling Ordination from the Church of Rome so D. Bridges (56) Defence of the GouernmeÌ„t p. 1276. speaking of our Catholick Bishops and their Calling vrgeth thus in our behalf If our Protestant Brethren wil make them but meer Lay-men then are neither they nor we anie Ministers at al but meer Lay-men also for who ordayned vs Ministers but such Ministers as were either themselues of their Ministerie or at least were made Ministers of those Ministers Except they wil say the people can make Ministers c. yea some (57) SileÌ„ced Ministers supplication of Anno 1609. p. 9. 10. 17. Puritans do reproue their Protestant Brethren for deriuing their Ministerie from the Church of Rome But (58) Cont. Dur. l. 9. p. 820. D. Whitaker exemplifyeth the same saying Luther was a Priest and Doctour according to your Rite or ordination c. And it is manifest that so also was Zuinglius Bucer Oecolampadius and innumerable others c. M. Parkins (59) Vol. 1. p. 737. speaking of the Calling of the first Preachers of the Protestant Ghospel argueth thus If they had no Calling neither haue we that are their followers But They had their Callings c. from the Romish Church itself for they were either Priests or Schoole-Doctours as in England Wiccliffe in Germanie Luther in Bohemia Iohn Husse and Hierom of Prage at Basil Oecolampadius in Italie Peter Martyr others And therefore these with manie others were ordayned either in Popish Churches or in Schooles c. And agayne We say the first restorers of the Ghospel in our times had their first Callings of them to wit the Papists M. Mason discoursing at large of this verie poynt of Ordination and in particular of the Ordination of our English Protestant Clergie confesseth first that the Roman Church hath euer had true power of Ordination (60) Consecration of the Bishops of England Ep. Dedic Such was the goodnes of God saith he that euen in the darknes of Poperie as Baptisme so the Ministerial function c. was wonderfully preserued for the Church of Rome by Gods special prouidence in her ordination of Priests retayned such Euangelical words as in their true and natiue sense include a Ghostlie Ministerial power to forgiue sinnes c. Thus the Church of Rome gaue power to her Priests to teach the truth c. which (61) Ibid. p. 262. Power saith he is a Rose which is found in the Romish wildernes but the plants therof were deriued from the garden of God It is a Riuer which runneth in Aegipt but the fountaine and Spring of it is in Paradise It is a Beame which is seen in Babilon but the original of it is from the Sphere of the Heauen Wherefore when your Priests returne to vs our Church paring away their Pollutions suffereth them to exercise their Ministerial function according to the true meaning of Christs word And agayne (62) Ibid. p. 262. we being content with their calling and commission of their function already committed vnto them do not reiterate their ordination and Imposition of hands And as Catholick Priâ—sts Apostated only through vice are here allowed for sufficient Ministers without al new ordination from anie Protestant SuperinteÌ„dent so doth M. Mason most seriously labour throughout his whole Booke to proue the ordination of the Protestant English Clergie to haue been certainly deriued from our Catholick Roman Church To which end acknowledging that (63) Ibid. p. 64. 65. 66. The whole Clergie of England at this day deriueth their Consecration from Cranmer he painfully laboureth to proue that Cranmer was appoynted by Pope Clement to be Archbishop of Canterburie and that he was Consecrated by three Catholick Bishops which Consecration was performed with wonted Ceremonies according to the vsual forme of the Romane Church which saith he continued al the dayes of King Henrie the Eighth euen when the Pope was banished yea he expresly concludeth his book thus (64) p. 267. Thus it appeareth that although we receaued our Orders from such as were Popish Priests yet our Calling is lawful So cleer it is that M. Mason would be glad to wring his Ministers Ordering from our Roman Church And the like is acknowledged taught by (è) Cath. Trad. p. 183. Buca loc com p. 509. Bernard in his Diswasion from Brownisme p. 144. Whyte in his way to the Church p. 404. Fotherby his Answer annexed to his 4. Sermons p. 81. Sutcliffe against D. Kellison p. 5. Sarauia of diuers Degrees of Ministers p. 9. sundrie other Protestants But here I can not but obserue by the way how strange it is that Protestants should thus much delight and please themselues in their Ordination from Cranmer a man so vicious inconstant and treacherous both to God and man Doth not D Godwin relate that (65) In Cranmsr p. 123. Being yet verie young he â—aryed and so lost his fellowship in Iesus Colledge in Cambridge Doth not Fox report that being Archbishop in his returne from Rome he brought with him a Dutch
Confess Mansfelden Ministror tit de Antinomis f. 89. 90. that the Law of God is not worthie to be called the Word of God If thou beest a where a whore-mungar if an adulterer or otherwise a sinner beleeue and thou walkest in the way of saluation When thou art drowned in sinne euen to the bottom if thou beleeuest thou art in the midst of happines Al that busie themselues about Moyses that is the Ten Commandments belong to the Diuel to the gallowes with Moyses In like sort Illiricus the chief of the Centurie-writers and whom M. Bel termeth 16) Regim of the Chur. p. 28. a very famous Writer and most worthie defender of the Christian truth this so famous defender of Protestancie is accused of these Antinomian errours by his owne Brethren saying 17) Act. Colloq Aldeburg p. 94. After the death of Luther when Flaccus Illiricus and manie other factious Companions of his had begun againe those Antinomian filthinesses c. And with no litle applause of the multitude c. had dispersed them abroad c. Yea D. Hutter publick Professour at Wittenberg addeth yet further saying 18) Concord explicat Art 5. c. 1. p. 478. And see Art 6. p. 535. 536. c. But neither did that errour rest in a narrow compasse but presently getting strength crept abroad c. In so much that Melancthon in the last Edition of his CoÌ„mon Places hath plainly renewed the same errour c. And An. 59. the later Antinomians who named themselues the Schole-men of Wittemberg publikly and before the whole Church vndertook the Defence of that errour Yea that Antinomian furie encreased so much that also An. 70. in this our Wittemberg some Diuines for the obtaining of the highest degree in Diuinitie c. propounded publickly that errour and endeauoured to defend it as it appeareth by the 38 and 39. Theses of that Disputation Some Protestants also teach that 19) Act. Mon. p. 1335. And see the Parable of the wicked Mammon wherof Tindal is sayd to be Authour p. 573. 486. the Commandments were giuen vs not to do them but to know our damnation and to cal for mercie to God And D. Whitaker sayth accordingly 20) Cont. Camp par 8. p. 153. Christ proposeth to vs another more easie condition Beleeue and thou shalt be saued By this new league the old one is taken away that whosoeuer beleeueth the Ghospel is freed from the condition of the Law For those who beleeue are not vnder the Law but vnder Grace what need I say more Christians are freed from the curse of the Law not from the obedience But if Christians be deliuered from the condition curse of the Law how can they be bound to the obedience of it Or what can the breach therof be preiudicial vnto them So that if Catholicks do at anie time vrge against Protestants the authoritie of Moyses or of his Law or the Ten Commandments sundrie of the chiefest Protestants haue alreadie answered I wil not heare Moyses he is Christ's enemie he is the maister of hangmen Away with Moyses therefore to the gallowes His Law is a fable leading to Acheron or the pit of Hel. The Ten Commondments do not pertaine to Christians they are the fountain of al Heresies and are not to be taught in Churches The Law of God is not worthie to be called the Word of God Yea if thou be an adulterer or drowned in the depth of sinne do but beleeue and thou art in the midst of felicitie And so al Arguments drawne from Moyses or his writings are of no force or esteeme in the iudgement of Protestants But to proceed to other Scriptures Luther further affirmeth that 21) In Ser. Conuin tit de Patriar Prophet he doth not beleeue al things to be so done as they are related in the booke of Iob. And againe 22) Tit. de libr. Vet. Nou. Testa the booke of Iob is as it were the argument of a fable to propose the example of Patience And when Luther had read ouer the booke of Ecclesiastes his graue censure was 23) Pet. Robenstock lib. 2. Colloq Lat. Luâ—her c. de Vet. Test This Booke is not perfect manie things are taken away it wanteth bootes and spurres that is it hath no perfect sentence It rideth vpon a long reed as I when I was a Monk was wont to do in the Monasterie And as for the Canticles which our English Protestants terme the Ballet of Ballets of Salomon 24) Bible of An. 1595. Luther was of opinion that they imported no further but only a familiar 25) In Exordio fuarum Annot. in Cant. conference between Salomon and the Common-wealth of the Iewes inuiting Salomon to raigne ouer her But Castalio proceedeth further iudging this Book to be only 26) In his Laâ— Transl of the Bib. Praef. in Cant. the first Edit And see Beza in Praef. ante Comment Calu. in Iosue a loue-communication betweene Salomon and his Mistris Sulamitha for which he citeth those words Returne Sulamitha returne and let vs looke vpon thee adding also in the Margent Sulamitha the Mistris and spouse of Salomon And Beza testifyeth of Castalio that 27) In Vita Caluini And see Vvhitak poorest euasion hereof cont Dur. l. 1. p. 121. he commanded the Canticles of Salomon to be thrust out of the Canon as an impure and obscene Song reuiling with bitter reproches such Ministers as resisted him therin Yea this so impious reiecting this parcel of Canonical Scripture was so grosse in Castalio a Caluinist that now since in the later Editions of his Bible at Basil the Protestant publishers therof haue for verie shame altered it But now to passe from the Old Testament to the New and to omit that Caluin 28) Instit l. 2. c. 16. §. 18. resteth doubtful whether the Creed commonly called the Apostles Creed was made and published by the Apostles or no and consequently whether it be of infallible authoritie and beleef He further chargeth S. Mathew's Ghospel with errour saying 29) In Matth. 27. vers 9. Surely the name of Hieremie to be erroneously put for Zacharie the thing itself sheweth because no such thing is read in Hieremie but that other place vnlesse it be dexterously applyed may seeme to be drawne into a contrarie sense c. And wheras Math. 20.16 Christ sayth Manie are called but few are chosen Caluin reiecteth it saying 30) Harm in Math. 20.16 Minimè quadrat quae à quibusdam inseritur sententia Multi vocati pauci electi That sentence Manie are called few are chosen which by some is inserted doth not agree Which words doth not agree he expoundeth in French is nothing to the purpose M. Iewel likewise affirmeth 31) Def. of the Apol. p. 361. that S. Mark alleadgeth Abiathar for Abimelech and S. Mathew Hieremias for Zacharius 32) Bible of An. 1592. Our English Church Math. 6. receaues as Canonical scripture these
p. 23. Primacie Ecclesiastical denyed to Emperours by the Fathers of the Primitiue Church l. 2. c. 4. p. 23. l. 3. c. 3. p. 9. 10. Priests ordained by Bishops l. 2. c. 22. Priests are to liue chast l. 2. c. 17. p. 69. Hereticks impugning the same condemned l. 2. c. 17. l. 3. c. 8. p. 42. 48. Priests anoynted at their Consecration l. 2. c. 22. Priests haue power from God to remit sinne l. 2. c. 10. p. 46. Priests crownes shauen in the Primitiue Church l. 2. c. 22. The Primitiue Church her authoritie l. 2. c. 2. p. 3. seq To the Primitiue Church some Protestants pretend to appeale l. 2. c. 2. p. 3. 4. Other Protestants dislike the foresaid Appeale l. 5. c. 1. p. 2. Protestant Church inuisible at S. Gregorie's time l. 3. c. 1. p. 1. Inuisible al these last 1000. yeares Ib. p. 1. at Luther's time Ib. p. 2. at Wicklifes time Ib. p. 3. at at Waldo's time Ib. p. 4. at Constantine's time and since Ib. p. 4. 5. In the Apostles time and after to Constantine Ib. p. 5. Protestants went out of the Catholick Church l. 3. c. 7. p. 24. Protestants neuer wrought miracles l. 4. c. 4. p. 22. 23. Protestants confessed external dissimulation in matters of ReligioÌ„ l. 4. c. 6. p. 38. Protestant Writers preferred by Protesstants before S. Peter and S. Paul l. 5. c. 3. p. 22. 23. The name Protestant from whence first l. 3. c. 7. p. 32. The name Puritan from whence first Ib. 32. Protestants are enforced to vse diuers names for distinction of their Religion and opinions Ibid. p. 33. The name Papist whence Ibid. p. 31. Purgatorie Prayer and Sacrifice for the dead confessedly taught by the Fathers of the Primitiue Church l. 2. c. 11. p. 50. seq l 5. c. 2. p. 14. Purgatorie belieued by the ancient belieuing Iewes l. 2. c. 11. p. 53. Purgatorie denyed by Aerius and he condemned for the same by the Fathers l. 2. c. 11. p. 52. l. 3. c. 3. p. 11. R. RElicks confessedly reuerenced by the Fathers of the Primitiue Church l. 2. c. 15. l. 5. c. 2. p. 15. By Relicks miracles wrought l. 2. c. 15. To Relicks Pilgrimages made in the Primitiue Church Ibidem Relicks translated Ibidem Relicks impugned by Vigilantius and he condemned for the same by the Fathers l. 3. c. 3. p. 10. Roman Church continued confessedly a pure Church for the first 600. yeares l. 1. c. 5. p. 21. 22. l. 2. c. 2. Roman Church continued vniuersally these last 1000. yeares l. 1. c. 2. p. 4. Roman Church continued vniuersally since Constantine l. 1. c. 5. p. 26. Roman Church continued the first 300. yeares after Christ l. 1. c. 5. p. 22. Roman-Church hath no knowne beginning since the Apostles l. 1. c. 5. p. 26. Roman Church her beginning is ascribed to the Apostles times Ib. p. 20. S. SAcraments to conferre grace is the confessed doctrine of the Primitiue Church l 2. c. 7. p. 32. Seauen Sacraments taught by the Primitiue Church l. 2. c. 7. p. 32. Saints to be prayed vnto is the confessed doctrine of the ancient Fathers l. 2. c. 13. p. 57. Saints to be prayed vnto was taught by the ancient Iewes l. 2. c. 13. p. 59. Vigilantius and Aerius denying the same were condemned by the Fathers l 2 c. 13 p. 58. l. 3. c. 3. p. 10. Scotus obiected against the Real presence and answered l. 3. c. 8. p. 46 47. Scriptures appealed vnto by al Hereticks l. 3. c. 3. p. 9. l. 4. c. 1. p. 2. Scripture hath seeming repugnances l. 2. c. 5. p. Scriptures discerned for Canonical by the Church l. 1. c. 1. p. 2. Simeon the Monk commended l. 2. c. 18. p. Sinne attributed to God as the Authour condemned l. 3. c. 5. p. 15. Sigebert l. 3 c. 8. p. 52. T. TRaditions confessedly taught by the Primitiue Church l. 2. c. 6. p. 30. Traditions taught by the ancient belieuing Iewes Ibid. p. 31. Transubstantiation confessedly taught by the Fathers of the Priuitiue Church l. 2. c. 8. p. 34. V. VEstments Vessels consecrated to Church vses l. 2. c. 22. Vow of Chastitie approued and practised by the Primitiue Chuch l. 2 c. 17. p. 69. Iouinian condemned for denyal therof l. 3. c. 4. p. 13. W. WAldo no Protestant l. 1. c. 3. p. 12. Wales conuerted to Christianitie in the Apostles times l. 1. c. 6. p. 18. The VVelch-men or ancient Brittans were Roman Catholicks l. 1. c. 6. p. 28. They changed not their Faith before S. Austin's coming l. 1. c. 6. p. 30. VViccliff no Protestant l. 1. c. 3. p. 11. 12. VVorkes to iustifye and merit confessedly taught by the Primitiue Church l. 2. c. 21. p. 86. Heretiks denying the same condemned l. 3. c. 5. p. 14. FINIS FAVLTS ESCAPED Epist Ded. Parag. Now supposing for plainly read painfully Lib. 1. c. 1. pag. 2. lin 26. for Ccclestical read Ecclesiastical p. 3. for ea read and. cap. 2. p. 4. lin antepen for Confirmation read Confutation Lib 2. c. 1. p 2. lin vlt. for Church read Churches c. 4 p. 17. lin anteantep for which read with p. 18. lin 18. for Athasius read Athanasius p 19. lin 40. for 20 read second hundred cap. 5. p. 26. lin 42. for Churches read Councels p. 29. lin 33. for only not read not only cap. 8. p. 37. lin 10. for purposely to read purposely profâ—sseâ—h to p. 38. lin 13. for or read of cap. 10 p. 48. for command read commend Lib. 3. c. 1. p. 4. lin 21. for thy read this cap. 4 p. 13. lin 34. for Arians read Aerians cap. 6. p. 2. lin 14. for roriter read writer cap. 7. p. 23. lin ante p adde 9 p. 26. lin 6. for with read which p. 31. lin 24. for that read the. p. 32. lin 14. for the read that cap. 8. p. 37. lin 36. for Turctisme read Turcisme p. 48. lin 1. for contracted read contradicted lin 17. for 66 read 26 p. 43. lin 29. for noâ— worthie read not vnworthie Lib. 4. c. 2. p. 5. lin 25. v. Dauid adde 7 lin 27. v. Church adde 8 p. 6. lin 2. v. Vvittemberg adde 17 p. 7. lin 36. v. VvhitaKer adde 34 p 8. lin 1. for often read after lin pen for Scriptures read Scriptures cap 4. p. 13. lin pen. p. 14. lin 27. for Vzias read Ozias lin 9. p. 20. lin 9. for had read and p. 24. lin 3 for ad read al lin 35. for Chapter 4. read Chapters Lib. 5. c. 1. pag. 3. lin 1. sor read sort c. 1. pag. 4. lin 3. ad read and. pag. 10. lin penult beshabken read beshaken lib. 5.