The price of our redemption is the blood of Christ or his corporall life which consisteth in blood Stapleton in Prompt Quadrages fer 4. Hebdom Sanct. Caluin putteth not onely an other price beside the corporall death of Christ but also an other greater and more excellent Can Christian ears suffer this PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker lib. 8. cont Dur. sect 18. Caluin wrote most truely Christs death had done nothing That nothing had beene done if Christ had suffered onely corporall death Perkins de Serm. Dom. to 2. col 576. Reason it selfe teacheth Was not sufficient that onely corporall death of Christ was not sufficient to redeeme them who had deserued death of bodie and soule Willet Cont. 20. q. 3. p. 1088. The bodilie death of Christ was Was not the full price not in respect of Gods iustice the whole and full price of our redemption Caluin 2. Instit c. 16. § 10. Nothing had beene done if Christ There needed a greater price had suffered onely bodilie death There was an other greater more excellent price that he suffered in his soule the horrible torments of a damned and lost man Bezalib quaest vol. 1. Theol. Christ was in the midst of the torments of hell for to deliuer vs fully from both deathes c. Scarpe de Iustif Cont. 16. Writeth that diuers ProtestaÌ„ts say that those places of Scripture in which is saied that Christ dyed for vs are to be vnderstood onely of his feeling of the wrath of God and not of his bodilie death and that his bodilie death auailed nothing to our redemption nor was a parte of the satisfaction for sinnes THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that Christ hath reconciled vs in the bodie of his flesh by death hath pacified all things by the blood of his crosse hath sanctifieth vs by the oblation of his bodie hath found an eternall redemption by his blood hath redeemed vs by his blood with his blood in his blood hath purchased the Church with his blood The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that nothing had beene done if Christ had suffered onely corporall or bodilie death that his corporall death was not sufficient to redeeme vs that there was need of a greater and excellenter price that his corporall death auailed nothing to our redemption nor was any parte of the satisfaction for sinnes Which are so manifestly opposite to Scripture as some Protestants confesse it See lib. 2. c. 30. ART XVIII WHETHER CHRIST DIED for the impious and reprobats SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Christ died for the impious For him that perisheth For the vniust Rom. 5. ver 6. For why did Christ when we as yet were weake according to the time die for the impious 1. Cor. 18. ver 11. And through thy knowledge shall thy weak brother perish for whome Christ hath died 1. Peter 3. v. 18. Because Christ also died once for our sinnes the iust for vniust 2. Peter 2. v. 1. seq But there were also false Prophets in the people as also in you there shal be lying maisters which shall bring in sects of perdition and denie him that hath bought them the For those that goe to perdition Lord bringing vpon themselues speedie perdition vnto whome the iudgment now long since ceaseth not and their perdâ—tion slâ—mbereth not CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarmin l. 4. de Amiss Gratiae c. 7. Our Lord suffered and died for the vniust PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker Controu 2. q. 1. c. 9. p. 437. Christ did not giue Christ died not for the impious The wicked not redremed by Christ himselfe for the impious and reprobates Which he repeateth cap. 13. Rainolds thesi 4. q. 22. The wicked albeit they be termed faithfull for their profession of faith or for temporall faith yet are they not redeemed or founded in Christ. In Apologia thesium p. 246. Christ offered himselfe for the elect onely 247. Redeemed only the elect The elect onely were redeemed of Christ Perkins de Praedestinat tom 1. col 135. Whome at anie time he acknowledged not he neuer bought or redeemed with the price of his blood col 137. Of these Christ is onely a half-redeemer and therefore no redeemer And de Desertion col 1023. Christ is the redeemer onely of the elect and of none else So also D. Willet Contr. 9. q. 2. p. 893. Caluin l. cont Heshus p. 849. I would know how the impious Not crucified for the impious eate Christs flesh for which it was not crucified and how they drinke his blood which was not shed to redeeme their sinnes Beza in Colloq Montisbel p. 447. Christ died not for the sinnes of them that are damned He shed not his blood for the remission of the sinnes of the impious and damned Epist 28. It is false that Christ is the mediatour of the infidels also Zanchius in Summa Praelection to 7. col 272. Christ according to the purpose of his Father was borne praied suffered and died onely for the elect In Depulsion Calum col 253. The Reprobats not redeemed reprobats were not redeemed by Christ Piscator apud Gerlachium Disput 9. Christ no waye died for the reprobats other sufficiently or effectually THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that Christ died for the impious for the vniust for those that perish that he bought lying monsters who bring in sects of perdition and bring vpon themselues speedie perdition and whose perdition slumbereth not Catholiks say the same Protestants expressely teach the contrarie that Christ gaue not himselfe for the impious or reprobats that the wicked were not redeemed in Christ that Christs flesh was not crucified for the impious nor his blood shed for their sinnes that Christ offered himselfe onely for the elect that they onely were redeemed by Christ that Christ is redeemer of the elect and of none els no mediatour of Infidels was borne suffered and dyed for the elect onely that nether sufficiently nor effectually he died for the reprobats Which are so contrarie to Scripture as manie Protestants acknowledge it See l. 2. c. 30. ART XIX WHETHER CHRIST DIED for all SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 2. Corint 5. v. 14. For the charitie of Christ vrgeth vs iudging Christ died for all this That if one died for all then all were dead and Christ died for all 1. Timoth. 2. v 6. Christ Iesus who gaue himselfe a redemption for all Chap. 4. v. 10. Who is the Sauiour of all men especially of the faithfull Hebrews 2. v. 9. We see Iesus because of the passion of death crowned wiâ—h glorie and honour that through the grace of God he might taste death for all 1. Ioan. 2. v. 2. We haue an aduocate with the Father Iesus Christ the iust and he is the propitiation of our sinnes and not of ours onely but also for the whole worlds Ca. ver 14. The Father hath sent his Sonne the Sauiour of the world CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess
the disobedience of one man manie were made sinners CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 4. de Amiss Gratiae c. 13. In that one man all sinned PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Zuinglius de Peccato orig to 2. f. 116. Nether hindreth it We sinned but figuratiuely in Adam Not truely sinned that S. Paul Rom. 5. saieth All haue sinned For after the same manner the worde Sinned is putte metonymically De Ratione fidei ib. f. 539. I confesse that our first father committed a sinne which is truely a sinne but they who are descended of him did not sinne in this sorte Adolphus Venator apud Homium in Specimine c. We did not sinne in Adam art 15. Thereupon it may be gathered that we did not sinne in Adam because c. THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that all sinned in Adam that by his disobedience manie are made sinners The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that all sinned in Adam but figuratiuely that Adam truely sinned but not they who are descended of him that we sinned not in Adam ART XVIII WHETHER THERE BE anie originall sinne SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Scripture in places before cited saieth that all sinned Originall sinne true sinne in Adam that by his disobedience many were made sinners 1. Cor. 15. v. 12. that in Adam all died CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 5. Can. 2. If anie shall say that Adam by his sinne of disobedience transfused onely death and punishment of the bodie in all man kinde and not sinne which is the death of the soule be he accursed PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Zuinglius de Peccato orig to 2. f. 115. What could be saied Originall sinne is no sinne Not truely called sinne more breefly or clearly then that originall sinne is no sinne but a sicknesse Fol. 116. This is that I will that originall sinne is not truely called sinne but metonymically of the sinne committed of our first father fol. 115. What could be saied more weakly and more farre from Canonicall Scripture then that it is not a sicknesse but a guilt De Baptismo ibid. fol. 87. It followeth Not guilt No staine that litle ones or Infants are without all blemish or staine f. 90. Whence we gather that originall sinne is indeed a sicknesse which yet of it selfe is not faultie nor can cause the punishment of damnation Againe How can it be that what is a sicknesse and contagion deserueth the name of sinne or is sinne indeed And Respons ad Luther fol. 517. The summe of all which No sinne indeed Not such a sinne as hath fault Not properly sinne Maketh not guiltie of death I taught in my booke of originall sinne is this That originall contagion is not such a sinne that hath any fault but rather is a sicknesse which by reason of Adams sinne cleaueth vnto vs. Homius in Specimine c. art 15. bringeth many Protestants who denie originall sinne as Venator Originall sinne is not properly sinne nor deserueth damnation Arminius Originall sinne is fondly saied to make guiltie of death Borrius There is no reason why God would impute this sinne to Infants Beza de Praedestinat cont Castel vol 1. p. 421. thus writeth of Castellio whome D. Humfrey ad Ration 1. Campiani much commendeth for learning and honestie Out of which it may be easily gathred that ether thou accountest originall Originall sinne a fable sinne a fable or els doest so diminish it that what is by origin thou wouldst haue to be attributed to imitation Nether is Beza himselfe farre from the same opinion for 2. part resp ad acta Colloq Montisbel p. 103. he denieth that elected infants need any renouation Faber also and Erasmus whome Protestants challenge for theirs do denie originall sinne in Rom. 5. THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that all haue sinned in Adam that all die in Adam that by his disobedience manie are made sinners The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that originall sinne is no sinne but a sicknes not truely a fault but figuratiuely not a guilte not a blemish not a staine not faultie of it selfe that it can not cause damnation not such a sinne as hath fault not a sinne indeed nor deserueth the name of sinne THE SVMME OF THIS CHAPTER OF SINNES The things which we hau◠rehearsed in this chapter do make manifest that Protestants teach of sinnes quite contrarie to holie Scripture For the Scripture and Catholiks with it teacheth that sinnes are imputed to the faithfull that they are mortall to them as well as to others that they ought to be ouercomen of the faithfull that whosoeuer serue sinne serue not God that great sinnes putte out grace nor can stād with iustice that they are to be redeemed with good workes that to abstaine from them is necessarie to saluation that they are the cause why men are damned that we must giue an account of them that they are committed of the elect and that with full consent that vsurie is a sinne and that originall sinne is a true sinne All which Protestants do denie They make also manifest that Protestants play the What Protest take from sinnes theiues towards sinnes also and steale from them no lesse then from good things but that they steale from sinne other kind of qualities and for an other end For from God from Christ from Saintes from the Church from Sacraments from good workes and other godlie and holie things they steale that which is good vertuous and worthie of praise and honour that thereby they may not seeme so worthie to be loued and esteemed of men But from sinnes they steale malice all power of hurting the faithfull in saying they are not imputed to them cast not them out of Gods grace and such like now rehearsed to the end that they should not seeme so horrible and so much to be auoided of the faithfull And thereby they shew themselues to be freinds of sinne and precursors of him who is termed The man of sinne And thus much of 2. Thessal 2. Sinnes Now of Iustification from them CHAPTER XVI OF IVSTIFICATION ART I. WHETHER IVSTIFICATION be of workes SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. IAMES 2. v. 21. Abraham our father was he not Abraham iustified by workes Man Rahab iustified by workes vers 24. Do you see that by workes a man is iustified Et v. 25. Rahab the harlot was not she iustified by workes Luc. 7. v. 47. Manie sinnes are forgiuen her because she hath loued much Act. 3. vers 19. Be penitent therefore and conuert that your sinnes may be putte out CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton in Rom. 4. v. 2. Abrahams workes had glorie euen before God and he was iustified of then as S. Iames doth most expressely affirme PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Apologia Confess Augustanae c. de Iustif Reconciliation Reconciliation not by workes is not receaued by workes c. de Implet legis If anie thinke that he obtaineth remission of sinnes because
without distinction of elect or reprobates Be euerie one of you baptized in the name of Iesus Christ And vers 41. They therefore that receaued his word were baptized So cap. 8. vers 12. They were baptized men and weomen CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Card. Bellarm. lib. 3. de Iustificat cap. 14. Simon Magus conuerted by Philippe and bapsized did follow Philippe as Luke writeth PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Beza cont Illyric vol. 2. Theol. p. 144. What thou writest that Simon Peter and Simon Magus receaued the same whole Not fully baptized baptisme is most false And p. 131. We do not acknowledge that the Sacraments are intirely receaued of the incredulous In Colloq Montisbel p. 118. I graunt that the intire sacraments are offered not onely to the godlie but also to the vngodlie but not receaued intirely of the vngodlie And in 2. part Resp ad acta Colloq Montisbel p. 91. The whole sacrament is not receaued of the vnworthie Besides ib. p. 110. he sayeth that the inwarde ablution of the Holie Ghost is an essentiall parte of baptisme And p. 41. seqq in Colloq pag. 355. seqq oftentimes repeateth that the blood of Christ is the principall and most essentiall parte of baptisme And will not that the reprobates receaue ether inward ablutiō or the blood of Christ And therefore will not that reprobates receaue the whole essence of baptisme Moreouer in 2. parte cit p. 76. he writeth thus We say that Baptisme is the seale of remission and generation but not in euerie one nor alwaies And in his opinion it is essentiall to baptisme to be this kinde of seale and consequently baptisme is not true essentiall baptisme in euerie one Peter Martyr cont Gardiner col 970. writeth that Baptisme consisteth of water and remission of sinnes Which remission he will not haue to be giuen to reprobats And therefore col 853. saieth If one would speake exactly he should say that the impious do not receaue the whole sacrament but onely one parte thereof Piscator in Respons ad Buscherum c. 10. The faith of the receauer pertaineth to the substance of the Sacrament But they will not admit that reprobates haue faith and therefore haue not the whole substance of the Sacrament Besides Sacramentaries commonly teach that Christ is the matter and substance of the Sacraments and namely of the Eucharist So expressely teacheth Caluin l. de Caena p. 2. and 4. Instit c. 17. § 11. Peter Martyr cont Gardiner col 655. 755. Confessio Heluet. c. 19. and Consessio Basileensis art 20. But they denie that the impious or reprobates receaue Christ and consequently must say that nether the impious nor the reprobates receaue intire baptisme or Eucharist Whereupon Bucer apud Hospin part 2. Histor fol. 147. saied That such impious as are quite impious receaue nothing but bread and wine And the like they must say of baptisme and consequently they should rebaptize such as were quite impious when they were baptized as not receauing the whole substance of baptisme without which baptisme is no true baptisme Which may be also confirmed by that which Pareus saieth Colloq Theol. 1. disput 15. That Sacraments nether signifie nor seale and much lesse do giue any thinge to the incredulous Such therefore as were incredulous when they were baptized ought to be baptized againe as not hauing receaued ether the signe or seale of baptisme THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that the reprobate Simon Magus was baptized and that diuers others were baptized without making any distinction betweene the elect or reprobates amongst them The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that Simon Magus had not whole baptisme that the impious or reprobats do not receaue the whole sacraments that if we will speak exactly we must say that the impious receaue but a parte of the Sacrament ART VI. WHETHER BAPTISME BE effectuall in the reprobates or profit them anything SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Gal. 3. v. 27. For as manie of you as are baptized in Christ haue Baptisme effectuall in euerie one put on Christ Act. 2. v. 38. S. Peter speaketh thus without anie distinction of elect or reprobate Be euerie one of you baptized in the name of Iesus Christ for remission of your sinnes and you shall receaue the guift of the Holie Ghost CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Card. Bellarm. lib. 3. de Iustificat cap. 14. All infants are truely iustified by baptisme And lib. 2. de Grat. cap. 16. Originall sinne is truely remitted to many reprobates by the grace of baptisme PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Caluin de Rat. Concordiae p. 664. The Sacraments to the elect are helpsto saluatiō others they profit nothing De Cōsens Profiteth nothing to reprobates Sacramentor p. 754. Wediligently teach that God doth not indifferentlie put forth his power in all that receaue the Sacraments but onely in the elect And p. 761. The Sacraments profit not indifferently all but onely the elect of God Devera reform p. 325. Who admit others beside the elect to baptisme do profane it And addeth pag. 349. that baptisme was not appointed for the reprobate Beza in Colloq Motisbel pag. 385. Whome God hath not elected albeit they were baptized a thousand times with the externall baptisme of water yet faith and the Holie Ghost would Baptisme effectuall onely in the elect neuer be giuen to them And ib. and other where often The power of baptisme sheweth it selfe onely in the elect And in 2. part resp ad acta Colloq Montisbel p. 89. Faith and grace of baptisme is not giuen to all infants that are lawfully baptized Manie thousand infants baptized and not regenerated Which he repeateth p. 90. and 97. And in Colloq cit pa. 393. Manie thousande of infants receaue baptisme who yet are neuer regenerated Whereupon ib. p. 377. he writeth thus We can onely probably affirme that infants who are baptized receaue the fruite of adoption Zanchius de Praedest c. 6. to 7. maketh this conclusion To those who are not elect baptisme bringeth no cōmoditte nor the praiers made for them of the Church And in Confess c. 15. to 8. We beleiue that all are baptized with water but the elect onely with the spirit Musculus in locis tit de Baptisme None I thinke is so madde as to say that the Holie Ghost doth euē in the reprobates whiles they are baptized worke the effect of his grace which is appointed for the elect and faithfull THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that whosoeuer are baptized in Christ do put on Christ that euerie one without distinction of elect or reprobate may be baptized for remission of sinnes The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that Sacraments profit onely the elect and giue nothing to others that baptisme is appointed for the elect alone that the reprobate though they were baptized a thousand times should not receaue grace that manie thousands of infantes are baptized and not regenerated that onely the elect are baptized with the
Spirit and that the coÌ„trarie is madnesse Which is so opposite to Scripture as the holie Fathers pronounce that he is no Catholik who saieth that baptisme doth not take Prosper ad c. vlt. Gallor away sinne in the baptized reprobats and manie Protestants confesse it to be coÌ„trarie to Scripture See l. 2. c. 30. ART VII WHETHER BAPTISME CLEANSETH or washeth away sinnes SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Ephes 5. v. 26. Christ loued the Church and deliuered himselfe Baptisme cleanseth for it that he might sanctifie it cleansing it by the lauer of water in the word Tit 3. v. 5. According to his mercie he hath saued vs by the Saueth lauer of regeneration and renouation of the Holie Ghost 1. Peter 3. vers 21. Whereunto baptisme being of the like sorte Remitteth sinnes now saueth you also Act. 2. v. 38. Be euerie one of you baptized in the name of Iesus Washeth sinnes Christ for remission of your sinnes c. 22. v. 17. Rise vp and be baptized and wash away thy sinnes CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Catechismus ad Parochos c. de baptismo This must be first deliuered that sinne whether it be originally contracted froÌ„ our first pareÌ„ts or committed of vs though it were so haynous as scarce could be imagined is remitted and forgiuen by the admirable vertue of this Sacrament of baptisme PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker Cont. 2. q. 1. c. 9. We do not get health by the outward baptisme Etib. c. 9. God forbidde that any attribute that Baptisme auaileth not to the outward Sacrament which belongeth to spirituall grace Etib. q. 6. c. 3. Baptisme of it selfe auaileth infants nothing to saluation nor infuseth faith or any grace into them Perkins in Gal. 3. to 2. col 171. Baptisme indeed saueth but Saueth not not baptisme of water Willet Cont. 12. q. 3. p. 567. Baptisme is not a remedie against Giueth not grace originall sinne 569. Baptisme doth not conferre grace Luther de Captiuit Babil c. de baptismo Baptisme iustifieth Profiteth not none nor profiteth anie ib. coÌ„t Cocleum f 408. No parte of Iustification can be attributed to baptisme Melancthon in locis edit 1522. Sacraments do not iustifie Which he repeateth l. cont Anabaptistas Zuinglius de baptismo to 2. fol. 62. Baptisme is giuen and receaued for their sakes who hould the same faith with vs not for his sake who is baptized for in him that outward signe can worke nothing Fol. 70. Externall baptisme which is done by water Helpeth not helpeth nothing to ablution of sinnes Etf. 56. Some cried that externall things are wholy vnprofitable to saluation and that no trust is to be put in them scing they are vaine and altogether vnprofitable And surely they saied well if they had not passed the bounds of charitie and modestie Fol. 97. Baptisme cannot Washeth not sinnes wash away the filth of sinne nor washeth away sinne It is nothing but a sacramentall signe whereby Gods people is bound to one faith and religion 98. Baptisme maketh vs no whit the Maketh no vs better better And l. de ver fal relig fol. 91. Some thinke that baptisme ether wipeth away sinnes or is a signe and certification of their wiping away both which say what they please not what the word of God hath tought And in Rom. 4. tom 4. The signe of baptisme is not receaued for to confirme faith for to purge sinnes Confirmeth not faith And apud Hospin part 2. Histor fol. 31. Sacraments are onely badges of Christian societie and helpe nothing to saluation Finally l. de Peccato originall to 2. f. 122. he saieth How foolish then should he seeme who for the words of Scripture would auouch that by baptismall water we are washed from sinnes Caluin 4. Instit c. 15. § 10. Now it is cleare how false it is that by baptisme we are loosed and exeÌ„pted from originall â—inne § 2. Who will say that we are cleansed by this water In Catechismo Is no lauer of the soule Washeth not pag. 36. Doest thou thinke that water is a lauer of the soule No. In Admonit vlt. ad Westphal p. 812. What if baptisme wash vs how is the onely blood of Christ otherwhere called our ablution p. 855. If they inferre that the filth of the soule is purged by the corruptible element of water the sunne of iustice it selfe wil be darkened In Actor 22. v. 16. Paule was not washed by baptisme but recedued a new confirmation of the grace which he had obtained In Rom. 4. v. 12. We denie that men are iustified by baptisme In Ephes 5. v. 26. We must beware to thinke that water purgeth the filth of the soule Beza in Catechismo vol. 1. Theol. pag. 693. Doth water wipe away sinne No. In Colloq Montisbel p. 366. The soule is not washed with water but the bodie onely p. 377. The baptisme Infants not renouated when they are baptized of water is not the lauer of regeneratioÌ„ and renouation but onely signifieth and representeth it Et 357. We thinke it absurd that infants are renouated ether at that verie time when they are baptized or befoee they be of discretion and haue knowne and apprehended Christ by faith Which also he hath in 2. part resp ad Acta p. 322. Where also he saieth p. 91. I saied and do yet say that the renouation of infants who come to be men is not to be restrained to the time of their baptisme giuen to them ether in their infancie or their youth but that it beginneth froÌ„ that time when by actuall faith they apprehend Christ Which he repeateth p. 106. And apud Grauerum in Absurdis Caluin c. 4. sect 20. I nether saied that all or anie children are regenerated at the time of baptisme Which also teacheth Musculus in locis tit de baptismo So that they will not haue children to be regenerated ether by baptisme or wheÌ„ they are baptized Zanchius l. 4. de tribus Elohim c. 5. Water is onely a signe of regeneration Piscator in Thes loco 25. Ananias saied to Paul Rise and be baptized and washe away thy sinnes not that his sinnes were to be washed away by baptisme which cannot be washed away but by the blood of Christ THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that the Church is sanctified and cleansed by the lauer of water that we are saued by the lauer of regeneration that baptisme saueth vs that we are baptized for remission of sinnes that by baptisme sinnes are washed away The same say Catholiks Prorestants plainely say that baptisme iustifieth not saueth not auaileth nothing to saluation infuseth not faith or anie grace that it worketh nothing in him who receaueth it maketh vs no whit better cleanseth not sinne purgeth not sinne washeth not sinne wipeth not sinne away confirmeth not faith certifieth vs not of remission of sinne is onely a badge of Christian societie a signe whereby men are bound to on faith and religion that children are not
proper to the Elect 350 22. VVhether faith come by hearing 352 23. VVhether faith be euer lost 353 24. VVhether faith be rewarded 355 25. VVhether the faith of those who toucht Christs garments were pure 356 Chap. 14. Of good workes in generall Art 1. VVhether anie worke of a Sinner may be good p. 360 2 VVhether euerie good worke be sinne 362 3 VVhether good works be a sweet smell to God 364 4 VVhether good works be fully good 366 5 VVhether they be iust or iustice in the sight of God 369 6 VVhether in good works there be anie worth 371 7 VVhether eternall life be promised to good works 373 8 VVhether good works be meritorious 374 9 VVhether there may be glorie in good works 376 10 VVhether all good works be equall before God 378 11 VVhether good works be commanded of God 379 12 VVhether they be necessarie to iustification 381 13 VVhether they be necessarie to saluation 384 14 VVhether they be profitable to saluation or iustification 387 15 VVhether they be anie cause of saluation 390 16 VVhether they be a testimonie of iustification or predestination 393 17 VVhether they be a cause of Gods loue towards vs 395 18 VVhether we ought to doe good works 396 19 VVhether they may be done for reward 399 20 VVhether they be to be done for the glorie of God 401 Chap. 15. Of workes in particular Art 1. VVhether it be good not to marrie 406 2 VVhether virginitie be a vertue 406. 3. VVhether the state of virginitie be better then marriage 408 4. VVhether God would haue men to liue single 410 5. VVhether Fasting be a vertue 412. 6. VVhether fasting be a preseruatiue against the Diuel 414. 7. VVhether choice of meats be laudable 415. 8 VVhether we may pray for all 416. 9. VVhether we may pray for the dead 417. 10 VVhether we may pray for that which God hath not promised 419 11. VVhether anie obtaine for the worth of their praier 421. 12. VVhether we may pray in an vnknowne tongue 422. 13. VVhether we be commanded to say our lords praier 423 14. VVhether we may make vows 424 15. VVhether almes deliuer from death and sinne 426 16. VVhether we may giue all to the poore 427 17. VVhether pennance be commanded to all 428 18 VVhether affliction of the bodie be a parte of pennance 429. 19 VVhether pennance of the Niniuites was good 431 20. VVhether Eremitical life be lawfull Chap. 16. Of Sinnes Art 1. VVhether sinnes be imputed to the faithfull 435. 2. VVhether anie sinne be mortall to the Elect and faithfull 437. 3. VVhether onely incredulitie be sinne 438. 4. VVhether sinne ought to be ouercomen of vs 440. 5. VVhether anie that serue the flesh can serue God 441. 6 VVhether by greuous sinnes we fall from grace 442. 7 VVhether sinne can staÌ„d with iustice 8. VVhether sinne may be redeemed by good works 447. 9. VVhether to abstaine from great sinnes be necessarie to saluation 448 10. VVhether sinne be the cause of damnation 451. 11. VVhether we must giue account of our sinnes 453. 12. VVhether the iustified commit ill p. 454. 13. VVhether the iustified commit sinne 455. 14 VVhether the iustified euer do sinne wilfully 457. 15 VVhether the widows 1. Tim. 5. did sinne in marrying 458. 16 VVhether vsurie be sinne 459. 17. VVhether all sinned in Adam 460. 18. VVhether there is originall sinne 461. Chap. 17. Of Iustification Art 1. VVhether Iustification be of works 465. 2. VVhether it be of faith onely 467. 3. VVhether the iustified be iust in Gods fight 469. 4. VVhether the iustified be cleane 472 5. VVhether sinne remaine in the iustified 474. 6. VVhether sinnes be simply forgiuen 477. 7. VVhether all the iustified be equally iust 478. 8. VVhether there is anie inherent iustice 478. 9. Whether inherent iustice can be imputed 481. 10. Whether the iustified be infallibly certaine of their iustice 482. 11. Whether pennance goe before iustification 845. 12. Whether iustificatioÌ„ can be lost 487. 13. Whether the iustified may feare to fall 489. 14. Whether iustification be proper to the Elect 492. 15. Whether we cooperate to our iustification 493. 16. Whether after iustification anie punishment remaine 496 Chapt. 18. Of life and death euerlasting ART 1. Whether life euerlasting be a reward p. 499. 2. Whether it be a crowne of iustice 501. 3. Whether it be of faith onely 503. 4. Whether all men be to be iudged 505 5. Whether eternall life be to be rendered to anie 506. 6. Whether the soules of the Reprobates doe now suffer in Hell 507. 7. Whether Hell be anie place 509. 8. Whether Hell fire be true fire 510. Chapt. 19. Of Gods law ART 1. Whether Gods law be possible 513. 2. Whether euer anie kept Gods law 515. 3. Whether anie loued God in all theâ—â— heart 517. 4. Whether Gods law be in thâ— heart of anie 519. 5. Whether we ◠〈◊〉 â— that we may keepe Gods law 520. 6. Whether the keeping of Gods law be necessarie to saluation 521. 7. Whether the law of God be abrogated from the faithfull 522. Chapt. 20. Of mans law and superioritie ART 1. Whether there be anie Superioritie among Christians 526. 2. Whether man can make laws 527. 3. Whether mans law bindeth the conscience 529. Chapt. 21. Of free will ART Whether man be free in indifferent matters 532. 2. Whether man be free in morall matters 534. 3. Whether man cooperate with Gods grace to good 536. Chap. 22. Of mans Soule ART 1. Whether mans Soule be immortall 539. 2. Whether Mans soule be the forme of his bodie 545. 3 Whether there be anie resurrection of the dead 547. THE INDEX OF THE CHAPTERS CONTAINED in the second booke CHAPTER 1. That Protestants contradict the truâ— sense of Scripture because iâ— so manie points they gaynesay the expresse words thereof pag. 549. Chapt. 2. That Protestants confesse they contradict the sense of those words which the Cathol Church long since and manie of themselues now beleiue to be the words of God p. 611. Chapt. 3. That Protestants are forced to vse violence to that parte of Scripture which they receaue p. 615. Chapt. 4. That Protestants ouerthrow all force of the words of Scripture yea contemne and deride them p. 620. Chapt. 5. That Protestants say that words of Scripture which make against them were not spoaken of certaine knowledge p. 630. Chapt. 6. That Protestants saye that manie weightie sayings of the Scripture were not spoaken according to the mynd of the speakers p. 633. Chapt. 7. That Protestants are forced to say that the Scripture speaketh ironically c. p. 640. Chapt. 8. That Protestants are forced to turne the most generall speaches of the Scripture into particulars p. 647. Chapt. 9. That Protestants limitate manie propositions not limitated by the Scripture p. 654. Chapt. 10. That Protestants change manie absolute speaches of Scripture into conditionals p. 665. Chapt. 11. That Protestants change conditionall speaches of Scripture