but because there is truth in God to perform his Promises And we repent because we believe Remission Here note That to believe Remission may be considered either in the Promise or in the Performance The Promise of Remission is made for the Penitent and Repentance required as a mean to fit men for it Is not this evident by the Preaching of Christ and his Apostles Mar. 1. 15. Act. 2. 38. and 3. 19. The performance of this promised Remission doth presuppose Penitency in the sinner yea and doth put him more upon it So that as of Faith there is one act that doth go before Remission and another act that doth follow after So also of Repentance there is somthing of it doth go before Faith and something also doth follow after Indeed saith this Author Judas Repentance may go before Faith i. e. before the knowledge of Remission But Godly Repentance doth follow after I might reply That is improperly said to go before this Faith when as this Faith doth never follow after Doubtless if Faith be the knowledge of Remission it doth never follow upon Judas Repentance But this I rather reply That it was not a Judas Repentance that went before Remission in the Old Testament nor is it a Judas Repentance which the Apostle doth call for to this end that their sin might be blotted out Act. 3. 19. Nor can it with reason be denyed but that he who saith Repent and be converted that your sins may be blotted out doth leave them to conclude that unless they do repent their sins shall not be blotted out And again that if they do repent their sin shall be blotted out Consequently there is a Repentance which is required as a mean to obtain Remission and that by the warrant of Scripture-Text And therefore it is no Doctrine of Antichrist not footstep of the Man of Sin to declare Repentance as a mean of Remission But now to return to the Question propounded viz. Whence is it that sin doth trouble and terrifie the Conscience I should rather give this answer The reason is Because sin is not yet taken away out of the Conscience by the Application of the blood of Christ To say that there is no sin at all in the Conscience when we feel the sting and terror thereof is it not in effect to say No mote in the eye no thorn in the flesh when we feel the pain and pricking of it How doth it vex if it be not there Doubtless while it vexeth it is not quite taken forth nor is the rankling of it quite healed The Indisposition of the Body may adde to the distemper of the minde till it be removed and cured by Physick But when the body is in good order and yet the Conscience in spiritual distress doth it not appear that sin lyeth at the Door and must be removed out of the Conscience by the Application of the Blood of Christ Application of the Plaister is no less necessary then the preparation of it The Brazen-serpent set up cured none that would not look up to it Nor doth Christ cure any that will not believe him And how do we believe in him if we do not apply our selves to him for remedy This application of the blood of Christ is wrought by the Minstery of the Word and Sacraments hence it is called The Ministery of Reconciliation In which and by which God dispenseth his favors and comforts to them of his Houshold And by those Ordinances doth he bring home the blood of Christ to the Soul and Conscience of the worthy receiver And as in the Old Testament the guilt of sin was not removed out of the Conscience till the sacrifice appointed for this or that sin was offered which is not improbably aleaged as a reason why the sin of David lay so heavy upon him even because he made no hast to confess his sin and to bring his sacrifice without which no Remission so in the New Testament sin is not removed out of the Conscience till by the Ministery of Reconciliation the blood of Christ be applyed to the Conscience for the cure thereof God hath appointed the Ministery for this end and he will have his Ordinances honored and workings of his spirit in them acknowledged It is not for this cause that many who seek for Comfort with much importunity of prayer and supplication yet are held off for a long time Even because they do not address themselves to God in his Ordinances And here is that necessity and usefulness of Baptism to take away sin out of the Conscience which so much displeased the Antinomian Doctor nor of Baptism only but of the Lords Supper also yea of the whole Ministery of the Gospel Not as if the Word and Sacraments or the Ministery that dispenseth them had any power and efficacy in themselves But as hath been said because these are the Instruments of the spirit in applying the blood of Christ which alone is the remedy of our spiritual malady Note This Ministerial Application is only to the worthy Receiver And none such doth the Text of Scripture acknowledge but him who being truly humbled and grieved for his sin for this and that sin in particular doth judge himself And then by Faith looking up to Christ on the Cross as did Israel look up to the brazen serpent and resting upon the passion of Christ as the only satisfaction of Gods justice desireth to be purged in his Blood And in testimony of his Faith in the blood of Christ doth draw near to the Ordinance of Application that therein he may be made partaker of the blood of Christ to purge his Conscience and quiet his minde And here is the necessity of Repentance without which no Remission the second point of Antichristianism in the Antinomians account Not as if Repentance hath any efficacy of a meritorious yea or of an efficient cause but because Faith neither ought nor indeed can close with Christ and draw vertue from him for the purging of the Conscience but when it self is lodged in a penitent soul The Reason is Because so must the promise of pardon by Christ be receiv'd by man as it is tendred to him And this is not to the sinner as a sinner but to the sinner as humble and penitent as before was shewed So then the Answer of the Question returns to this Sin doth yet terrifie the Conscience notwithstanding that Christ on the Cross hath satisfied for it and so obtained reconciliation for the sinner Because otherwhiles men are not careful to seek for the Application of Christs blood to themselves in the Ordinances appointed What wonder if Israel dye of the serpent bitings if they will not look up to the Brazen serpent so here if men neglect the means of remedy what wonder is it if they lie and languish Object But even they that have often sought to God in these Ordinances yea and with much care have prepared themselves for the worthy receiving of
more sorrow nor crying no more curse nor fear therof according to the words of the Angel Rev. 21. 4. 22. 3. There is I grant a praejudicium in foro conscientiae a preludial Justification in the Court of Conscience which is a pregustation and foretaste of that final Absolution In the Court of Conscience doth Christ set up his Tribunal there doth he take notice of the Accusations that are put in by Satan against the sinner upon particular occasions and by the power and operation of the spirit working in the Conscience doth he upon the humble confession of the penitent soul pronounce the sentence of absolution by the Ministery of the Word and seal it by the blessed Sacrament and what is now done daily upon emergent occasions shall be ratified at the latter day according to that gracious promise of Christ made to Peter when he gave him the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven Mat. 16. 19. Whatsoever thou shalt loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven And the same in effect repeated to the Apostles Joh. 20. 23. Thus in present by the Ministery of Reconciliation there is a work of Iustification in the Court of Conscience But the final consummation is reserved to that day when Christ the Iudge proceeding judicially shal pronounce the sentence of absolution The main work of Iustification therefore is as yet future for to say that justification quatenus it comprehendeth remission of sin is one individual act or that the blood of Christ doth at once wash us from all even future sins in the Antinomian sense I dare not yield It is the blood of Christ and that alone which doth cleanse us from all sin so is it the word and spirit of Christ that leadeth us into all truth yet not all at once Truth it is that in our first union with Christ there is conferred the ground and pledge of future remission for all sins to the end of our lives the Ground of it is our Adoption sealed to us in our Baptism the which is not afterward cut off no not by the greatest sins which the believer doth commit still he is the childe of God though in respect of his sin he may be the childe of Wrath and lyable to punishment still he hath an interest in Christ and upon his repentance he shall have benefit and communion with him in his Merits and Graces The Pledge and pawn of future Remission i. e. of the Remission and Forgiveness of all future sins is that actual Remission of what sin for the present the soul stood guilty of at that time when he was United to Christ All sins past and present were actually pardoned viz. Actual sins in Converts Original in their Insants the guilt of these is remitted and their justification in reference to these sealed in Baptism This favor received is a Pledge of assurance to them that in future also by applying themselves to Christ they may and shall receive the forgiveness of their daily sins He that by the application of a salve hath his wound cured hath he not therein a Pledge of assurance that in the use of the same means upon the like occasion he may receive the same benefit But to say That in our first Union with Christ we receive an actual Remission of future sins is in mine Opinion as incongruous as to say The Cure is done and past before the wound be made I grant That it hath been received and passed for currant in the schools of our Divines That all sins are remitted to the Believer at once all viz. past present and to come so hath it been received That justifying Faith is a particular perswasion of Gods mercy to me But as Amesius hath well observed in Medulla Theol. lib. 1. cap. 27. That this was set down only to oppose that general assent to the Articles of our Creed in which Papists do place the essence of justifying faith And therefore though he granteth that Fides justificans parit hanc specialem fiduciam c. yet he defineth it to be Qua recumbimus in Christum ad Remissionem so I suppose that our Divines did set down this position of Iustification transacted at once to cut off the Popish ground for the Sacrament of Penance not foreseeing what we by experience finde how unhappy a ground is herein laid for loosness and Libertinism Hereupon Amesius ibidem coming to set down his Opinion of the matter doth mince it Remittuntur peccata justificatorum non praeterita solum sed etiam aliquo modo futura Note that aliquo modo Now to explain himself he addeth Hoc tamen est discriminis quod peccata praeterita per formalem applicationem Remissionis nobis in Christo paratae futura autem virtualiter tantum Praeterita in sese Futura in subjecto vel persona peccante The which is in effect to say Non remittuntur nisi in pignore The actual Remission of sins past is the Pledge and Pawn of what shall be upon the use and exercise of Faith But to conceive sin remitted as it were by an Ante-dated pardon is not only against sense and reason but also against the grounds of Religion Sense and reason saith there is no need of Remission before there be a guilt nor is there guilt before the sin be committed no need of a Plaister before there be a wound prepared aforehand it may be and laid ready but application of it must needs come in after the malady Then for the ground of Religion 1. In the fifth Petition we are taught to pray for the pardon of sin Now prayer is an act of Faith and hope and both these are de futuris of things expected and not in present possession Faith looketh upon the Promise hope upon the performance neither of them upon the possession No man prayeth for what he hath in hand or for what is compleatly done and past already I know what is usually said viz. That not the pardon it self but the assurance the feeling and comfort of it is that which is desired in the Petition Nor do I deny but that in respect of sins past and formerly pardoned this is so We play for greater assurance of that pardon because our Faith is like a narrow-mouthed Bottle which though cast into the sea yet is not filled but by degrees Or rather we pray for the continuance of assurance we have received not as if God were off and on with us or would revoke what he had given But because this daily Petition is a mean appointed of God to work that continuance and no sooner do we cease to pray and take off our eye from God in Christ but we cease to believe and receive that continuance Thus I say it is in respect of sins past but now for the sins that daily are committed it is the direct pardon of them which we desire of God in that Petition Nor can the words receive any other sense except we should wrest them
and so wrong the Wisdom of our Saviour as if he could not make choice of such words phrases as might plainly and understandingly express his meaning And if these words Forgive us do signifie Make us to know that thou hast long since forgiven us then why shall not the next words As we forgive receive the same interpretation Nay why not so also in the other Petitions Lead us not into Tentation Give us our daily Bread i. e. in the Antinomian sense Make us to know that thou hast not lead us that thou hast given us our daily Bread Will not this be found a sensless gloss nay an utter perverting of our Saviours intention And why then should it hold only in the fifth Petition and in none of the other 2. Adde this That one end of our daily address to the Sacrament of the Lords Supper is to obtain the Remission of our sins by the application of Christs blood The words of our Saviour touching the Wine are these This Cup is the New Testament in my Blood which is shed for you and for many for the Remission of sins That in it as we have often need by reason of our daily Transgressions so we may often look upon that Brasen serpent for the cure of our often bitings Thus what we ask of God in prayer the same in the Sacrament doth God bestow upon us viz. The daily pardon of our daily sins Were it not in this respect needful to provide for our wants was the pardon of all actual sins at once sealed in this Sacrament as is the pardon of our Original guilt sealed in Baptism what necessity to receive this Sacrament any oftner then we do the other sc. once for all 3. And above all it is a ground of Religion that nothing is to be received and believed but what is Revealed to us for a truth by the Word of God Now there is no ground in the Word of God for any particular person to believe that his sins are remitted already before he do repent and believe in Christ The Word of God sets down what counsel hath been given to men that they might obtain Remission Act. 2. 38. and 3. 19. But no where doth the Scripture say to this or that man Thy sins be forgiven And for any man to perswade himself of Remission before it be yea before he hath a word for it is presumption and not saith The Antinomian Doctors say That the Spirit of God doth reveal it in the heart of a man and the Voice of the Spirit is the Testimony of truth In very deed we may not refuse the Testimony of the Spirit nor question the truth of it But in as much as we know that Satan doth somtimes transform himself into an Angel of Light and that there be many false Spirits in which respect the Apostles bids us to try the Spirits nor doth Satan seduce only by the Doctrines of men but also by false suggestions whispering to the sinner comfort upon false grounds How shall we discern the Testimony of the Spirit from the suggestion of Satan They Answer Hereby it is discerned Because it speaketh things consonant to the Scripture Let this be manifested and the question is at an end But where doth the Scripture countenance that Voice of the Spirit speaking to the sinner and saying Thou art justified in the sight of God and thy sin pardoned and that long ago in the day of Christs Passion How I say is this proved to be according to the Scriptures They say The Scripture holdeth forth the Free Grace of God in Christ viz. That Christ is given a Saviour for sinners for Enemies for the Rebellious That God doth justifie the Wicked and the ungodly even when and while they are such That he calleth for no works of mans Righteousness nor any previous dispositions to qualifie men that may come to Christ So that neither Impiety nor Enmity can cast in any bar to hinder him that will lay hold upon Christ This we do not much question but withall we adde That the Scripture doth also call upon sinners to Repent and turn to the Lord that so they may be pardoned and their sins bloted out and in as much as we know that one Text of Scripture is no less truth then another nor may we so cleave to the one as to neglect the other for they are not contradictory if rightly understood we conclude that Christ is held forth a Saviour to sinners but so that they repent and forsake their sins not else no sin not the greatness of any sin no nor the multitude of great Transgressions can bar the humble Penitent Saint Iohn saith If we confess our sins God is faithful and just to forgive us 1 Iob. 1. 7. Note that If q. d. If not then there is no ground to hope for it Again we say That God doth justifie the ungodly as Christ doth save sinners in sensu diviso i. e. Not while they are ungodly not while they are sinners but when they have forsaken their wicked ways have turned to the Lord by true and sound repentance That text of Rom. 4. 5. speaking of him that worketh not but believeth in him that justifieth the ungodly must not be understood simply of such a one that doth nothing at all but respectively of such a one as doth not rest upon his works nor rely upon his Righteousness but renouncing his own works doth cast himself upon the Free Grace of God nor doth it use that word ungodly in the common sense sâ— for one that hath no goodness in him at all but in a limited sense viz for one that wanteth such a perfection of goodness as on which he may build the hopes of his justification And the reason of this explication is because the proposition is drawn from the instance of Abraham a man certainly not altogether void of works and Righteousness though not so complete and perfect in them as that he durst rest upon them but renouncing his works he did cast himself upon the Free grace of God and so was justified by his Faith Consequently that voice of Revelation in man which teacheth him to comfort himself in the assurance of his justification without any respect to the work of Repentance wrought in him this is not the voice of Gods spirit but the delusion of Satan There is no word of God on which to ground such an assurance and therefore it may not be received nor believed for truth it being a ground of our Religion That nothing is to be received but what is revealed by the word of God I might adde this also Nothing is to be received as a truth which is cross and contrary to the Text of Scripture Now that sins should be actually pre-remitted before-hand and the person actually justified before that by Faith he be United to Christ how doth it not cross that Text of Saint Paul Rom. 3. 25. where speaking of the Remission of sin
by the blood of Christ he mentioneth not sin indifinitely but Sins that are past for the Remission of sins that are past I know that some do by this phrase Sins that are past understand the Transgressions of them who lived in the time before Christ the Transgressions against the first Covenant Heb. 9. 15. But whether this be not an over-great straitning of the Text I leave it to the judgement of the Learned That of Heb. 11. 6. Without Faith it is impossible to please God alleaged by some to prove No Iustification before Faith is by H. D. turned off as not to the purpose Why so To please God saith he is to do things pleasing to God which cannot be done without Faith But he cannot so easily turn of those Texts Joh. 3. 18. and Eph. 2. In the former saith our blessed Saviour He that believeth not is condemned already How so Is the sentence of condemnation judicially past upon him or is the meaning of it that he is in the state of condemnation or in the words of John Baptist Verse 26. The wrath of God abideth upon him viz. till by Faith he lay hold upon Christ By nature we are the children of wrath saith Saint Paul we as well as others Jews and Gentiles one common estate of all till by Grace by a Quickning grace there be put a difference and this Grace is effectual through Faith Verse 8. Consequently no actual Remission of sin before the work of Grace which is yet more apparent from Verse 12. where speaking of those that then were quickned and justified he saith That before that work of Grace calling them and quickning to a communion with Christ they were without Christ without hope It is an overbase and unworthy conceit of the Scripture which is implied in the Answer that he maketh viz. This were something if we were so in Gods account as well as in our own esteem Unworthy of the Scripture is this conceit for whose Word is the Text of Scripture From whose dictating is it penned Doth Saint Paul in those words set down the judgement of men touching the state of Nature or rather the minde of God If so Howsoever in the purpose of God they were appointed to the effects and fruits of Love yet for the present they were not fitted for it till quickned by Grace Consequently not justified from their sins before their calling much less acquitted of their debts before they had run out into any sinful arrerages No pre-Pre-remission of sin before it be committed CHAP. V. The way of seeking vesolution touching our Adoption and Justification by signs and marks viz. The fruits of Sanctification whether it be altogether unsatisfactory THere be who teach That no fruit of Sanctification if it speak as the Lord giveth it to speak can speak peace to the soul And that inherent Qualifications are but doubtful Evidences for Heaven consequently that the way of seeking resolution by them is altogether unsatisfactory This conclusion I grant must needs follow upon those premises but how are they proved The reason alleaged is builded upon Gal. 3. 10. The Law is not of Faith but the voice of the Law is this Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things that are written in the Book of the Law to do them Are there not failings in all Can that that is full of failings speak peace How then can it secure a man that he hath Interest in Christ But now by this text alleaged to prove their position and by the Argument framed upon it it is evident that either they do not rightly understand what it is that we teach or will not rightly propound it For did we indeed hold forth these Qualifications to be immediate evidences in the way of a legal Righteousness then did they speak to the point Not so now when as we do only account them mediate Evidences and that in a way of Evangelical Righteousness We do not say That he that is Holy and Righteous is adopted for his Holiness or justified for his Righteousness or saved for his good works and duties performed No But this we say He that is Holy and Righteous is discerned to be Adopted Rom. 8. 14. They who are led by the spirit of God are the sons of God And whoso is adopted is justified and shal be saved Sanctification is an Evidence of Adoption and Justification not ex Antecedente but ex Consequente Not that either of these doth casually depend upon that but because there is an inseparable Connexion of all these in the person Adopted Saint Pauls Argument runneth thus Ye shall live because ye are children and known to be children because led by the spirit For the further clearing of this truth and discovering of Errors that darken the light and lustre of it I shall propound and prosecute these two propositions 1. That this is the way which the Saints of God have gone in seeking for and setting forth the evidence of their Salvation 2. That the new way of Evidencing only by the spirit and Faith cannot lay the Ground of a setled Peace except the work of the sanctifying spirit be also sought to give in Testimony The first Proposition This is the way which the Saints of God have gone in seeking for and setting forth the evidence of their Salvation I manifest this by three Texts which I make choice of to examine what Doctor Crisp hath objected against the instance of these three Graces Vniversal Obedience Sincerity of Heart and the Love of the Brethren which he refuseth as insufficient evidence of justification 1. Text. Psal. 119. 6. Saith David Then shall I not be ashamed when I have respect to all thy Commandments where note 1. His expectation Not be ashamed or confounded viz. when I am questioned either by God or Man 2. The ground of this When I have respect to all thy Commandments Do we not see That David doth comfortably assure himself that his Universal Obedience should give him boldness and confidence Whereupon is that it in ver. 5. His earnest desire was Oh that my ways were so directed that I might keep thy Commandments Now then was it so with David I might adde Job also whence that Confidence of his expressed Job 13. 15. and 27. 16. Is it not from his integrity see Chap. 23. 10. 13. and Chap. 31. was it so with them and may it not be so with us Had sanctification a greater influence upon their Spiritual estate then it hath upon ours Doubtless the Conscionable care of Universal Obedience is an Evidence and comfortable Ground of our assurance Object But how can this be an Evidence which Paul rejecteth as dross and dung Phil. 3. He was blameless as touching the Righteousness of the Law yet rejecteth it and will not rest upon it Sol. True indeed He was in his own opinion and in others also But this was only a Pharisaical blamelesness such as that that is mentioned Luke 16. 15. and 18.
the sacrament yet do not finde that peace of Conscience which is expected Sol. It may be so But do they withal rest upon it as an Ordinance of the spirit to apply the blood of Christ and so to seal unto the soul the Assurance of peace and pardon Do they I say rest in it or do they expect to receive their Assurance by some irradiation and immediate revelation of the spirit This is the error of some Others are careless in their walking afterward They forget that Caveat of the Psalmist The Lord will speak peace to his people But let them not return again to folly Psa. 85. 8. What wonder if the re-admission of sin into the soul renew the sting and terror of Conscience Satan re-entring brings seven other spirits worse then himself Hence commonly the terror afterward is greater then before Impossible it is that the soul should finde sweetness insin desire it delight in it And the Conscience not fear and tremble at the thought of Hel and the wrath of God Corol. To close up all Is the Conscience terrified See the way to finde remedy and how thou maist provide for comfort Not in the Antinomian way viz. by a violent perswasion of this That thy sin was long since laid upon Christ in the day of his Passion But by seeking for the Application of his blood in the Word and Sacraments Prepare thee for the worthy receiving of them by renewing thy Repentance By Faith look upon Christ in the Sacrament hear him speaking in the word as the assured remedy of all spiritual diseases and distresses carefully watch against future Tentations take heed of relapsing into sin Remember that as Christ hath joyned these two Petitions Forgive us our Trespasses and Lead us not into Tentation so hath he bound up the comfort of the former in the cautelous observation of the latter Whoso doth not watch against Tentation loseth all comfort of Remission THE ARGUMENTS OF The Compassionate Samaritan Touching the Power of the Magistrate in the compulsion of Conscience Examined THe intent and scope of the Book is to shew That the Magistrate ought not to punish any for the profession of his Conscience by Conscience he meaneth the mans present judgement and opinion though it be contrary to what is determined by Authority His Arguments be these 1. Because punishment is not due to what is necessitated 2. Because no man can presume of infallibility 3. Because the Magistrate ought not to compel any man to sin The first Argument VVHere there is a necessity there ought to be no punishment Because punishment is the just recompence of voluntary Actions not of necessitated But every man is necessitated to be of that opinion which he holdeth Nor can he chuse but be of that judgement whatsoever it is Because his reason doth necessarily enforce him to it while it concludeth the Position to be true or false Ans. Grant indeed Where there is a necessity there ought to be no punishment if there be no concurrence of the will Or if that necessitation proceed not from a faulty cause ex gr. The spider is by instinct of nature necessitated to make poison as the Bee to make honey The sinew that shrank in Jacobs thigh or the joynt that is dislocated necessitateth a man to halt he cannot chuse Yet here is no punishment due because here is no concurrence of the will nor is this necessitation from a faulty cause But now when drunkenness doth necessitate some to lust and others to wrath Or rather when corruption doth necessitate wicked men and Angels to sin such is their present condition they can do nothing but sin Yet is not this necessitation an excuse to save from punishment because this is not from natural instinct but from voluntary consent it is from a faulty cause so that it is not always true that where there is a necessity there ought to be no punishment Consequently we must inquire Whence this necessity viz. That he cannot chuse but be of that opinion whence I say it cometh Whether from a faulty or a faultless cause He saith His reason concludeth it to be so and so And hereby he is necessitated to be of this opinion He cannot believe otherwise then his reason guideth him Nor indeed is it fit he should during the time that reason so concludeth But then enquire farther whence is it that his reason doth so conclude Is it from the clearness of the Argument Or from the cloudiness of his understanding In some things there is such clearness in the Argument and such evidence in the light thereof that the judgement cannot but rest in it ex gr. The Articles of the Christian Faith and the Duties of the Moral Law The truth of the one the equity of the other is so clear that reason cannot but see the evidence and conclude accordingly But in respect of some other things though no less true and good in themselves there may be such cloudiness and darkness in the understanding that it cannot apprehend the evidence and force of that Argument and Reason which is aleaged and so for the present it is hindred in yielding assent to them But then the next enquiry is what may be the ground or spring of this darkness and obscurity Whether weakness and ignorance or wilfulness and prejudice If ignorance good reason that as yet the party be excused from punishment till farther information Not so if it proceed from passion and prejudice And would you know whether it proceed from the one or from the other Consider these Rules 1. If it proceed from weakness and not from wilfulness you shall finde in the man a readiness yea a diligence to enquire and search for farther information glad he is to be instructed Not so the other he is negligent and careless to enquire he liketh his present opinion and so pleadeth Conscience when indeed it is affection and affectation that doth wholly guide him He would not be convinced of an Error least he should lose what he hopeth to receive in holding this way 2. If from ignorance and weakness it is attended with meekness and humility Not so the other he is swelling supercilious self-seeking and self-conceited ready to contemn others at no hand ready to yield no not even to know truths if he perceive that they cross the conceit which he hath taken up Whereas the weak Christian is ready to acknowledge the gifts and graces of others that are contrary minded nor will he deny any truth though he cannot as yet acknowledge this in question to be a truth and â—o subscribe unto it Nor will he as doth the other too frequently censure those that are contrary minded 3. Weakness and Ignorance causeth in him sadness and sorrow of Heart in the consideration of his own dulness Grieved he is that he cannot see what other holy Saints and servants of God do see Hence also hearty prayer that God would reveal this truth also to him that
thee to note the object not the subject as there of Fear so here of Knowledge Scientia sui By the knowledge of him as Pagnin Vatablus and Tremelius Farther we cannot go till first we enquire what it is to justifie To justifie in the Text of Scripture doth sometime signifie To endeavor the justification of a sinner by acquainting him with the way and mean thereof as Dan. 12. 3. Sometime To effect it by acquitting the party accused from the Crime and Accusation which in this work of Justification is still presupposed Whether of these two other I let pass as not so applicable to this Text whether of them I say is most proper to the Text will appear by the Confirmation when we come unto it Onwards we make use of it to enquire farther into the Medium what is meant by His knowledge For answerable to these two the word His knowledge may import 1. Medium Revelationis That Doctrine by which Christ doth reveal the way of Justification 2. Medium Operationis That Grace by which Christ doth fit man for the benefit of Justification As Medium Revelationis so the Conclusion is The Gospel is that word of Truth that rightly enformeth us in the way and maner of Justification The Gospel i. e. that part of holy Writ which teacheth us the knowledge of Christ of his Person of his Office the Covenant of Grace and the condition required The Gospel opposed to the Law q. d. Not by the Law but by the Gospel and the Doctrine of Grace shall Christ propound and acquaint mankinde with the way of gaining their Justification Not by the Law Vnderst and this not in general as comprehending the writings of the Old Testament but in special as importing the Law of Moses and this considered as the condition of that Covenant made with Israel Not the Law of Moses but the Gospel of Christ is the mean of Revelation acquainting man with the way of obtaining his Justification What then Is this Law of Moses all of it altogether abolished Is it of no use and service to the Church of God to Believers now in the Constitution of the Church of Christ Some there be that would have it so whose main endeavor is to cast the Doctrine of it out of the Church and the care thereof out of the Conscience of the Christian neither the Precepts thereof alowed to binde men nor the Motives thereof to draw men to the Duties of Holiness See their Arguments examined Chap. 1. and 2. As medium Operationis and then the Conclusion will be That Faith in Christ is the way and mean of Justification Faith I say and not Works Faith not unfitly termed the Knowledge of Christ because this alone is that which doth rightly know Christ the fulness of his Merits and Graces None but the Believer doth acknowledge Christ nay none but he doth rightly fully and perfectly know him Faith is both the Daughter and the Mother of this Knowledge the knowledge of Christ The Daughter for Faith cannot lodge in an ignorant Soul The Mother for it leadeth on to perfection of knowledge This Faith is the mean by it shall Christ work in the heart of the Believer and dispose it for Justification Not by the works of mans Righteousness but by Faith in Christ is man justified How so Because it is Medium Recipiens as the hand or mouth of the Soul to receive that Spiritual Food and Physick that doth feed and cure the Soul It receiveth Christ and the communion of his Merits and Graces for the good of the Believer The Righteousness of Christ is not unfitly compared to Food and Physick to a Garment and Plaister which do no good but in the way of Application if not applied no good by them These are received by the hand or by the mouth and this is the work of Faith and by Faith we are said to be justified as by the hand the Body is fed and clothed viz. Instrumentally Upon this ground we conceive it That in order of nature justification cannot be considered as going before the habit yea the act of Faith but rather that Faith hath the leading hand and the precedency of Consideration St. Peter termeth Salvation the end of our Faith 1 Pet. 1. 9. By this end meaneth he only the consequent benefit which followeth upon it or rather the end intended and aimed at in believing Doth not Saint Paul prescribe it to the Jaylor as a mean to bring about the end Believe and thou shalt be saved Acts 16. 31. Doth he not shew the ground and reason of it Gal. 2. 16. We knowing that a man is not justified but by Faith in Christ even we have believed q. d. we have applied our selves to the use of the means that we might obtain the end If Faith be as a mean to the end then is it not to be considered as following but as foregoing the benefit of our Justification Plausible Arguments are aleaged to overthrow this Truth but their weight and worth is more in shew then in substance See them examined Chap. 3. In the Act expressing the benefit obtained by Faith we may not pass by the Tense of the Verb but by occasion of it as Doctor Crisp upon the like occasion see his Sermons on Isa. 53. 6. enquire into the Time when it is that this Act is done The Tense of the Verb is future He shall justifie Future it was then when the Prophet spake this Whether future still is a Question Or if not when it was to be transacted whether all at once dispatched The farther explication whereof see in Chap. 4. The Object remaineth This is in the word Many Not all but only a number There be who teach that All shall be saved a point well pleasing to flesh and blood If a man might live as he list abuse his Eye and Ear his Hand and Tongue yea his Hand and his Heart his Body and Soul to the service of Sin and Satan and yet hope for Salvation by Christ But this may not be it is not All but Many All shall not be justified by Christ nor saved by him Not through any defect of the means the Merit of Christ is sufficient to save all The Gospel doth call and invite all and no doubt but whosoever believeth shall be saved But it cometh to pass through the ill-disposition and negligence of man left to himself who regardeth not to perform the condition required By the Ordinance of God in whose hand as say our Divines Christ hath left the disposing of his Merit it is appointed That the Merit of Christ shall not be dispensed to mankinde but under a condition and without the performance of that condition it is not bestowed upon any Now mankinde left to themselves are negligent and careless to look to that condition and so through their own ill-deserts are excluded from the benefit of Christs Death and Passion So then it is not All but only Many Q. If not
else Saint Paul was deceived He saith If ye live after the flesh ye shall dye Rom. 8. 13. and again He that soweth to the flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption Gal. 6. 8. If you will exempt him from all possibility of sinning and from all possibility of living after the flesh Then I grant he need not fear death and Hell But if such only be true Believers I suppose you must go out of the World to seek for your true Believers Consequently since it cannot justly and truly be said either that Believers need not the threats of the Law or that they need not fear them it is fit that they should hear them and have them pressed upon the conscience The threats I say and therefore much more the precepts and duties of the Moral Law This we teach and thus we practise For by Faith we do not make void the Law nay we do establish it saith the Apostle Rom. 3. 31. Our Faith in Christ doth give us an interest in the Promise of life and salvation But our Conformity to Christ in holiness and the daily growth and increase thereof is that which doth by degrees fit and fashion us for it Well therefore saith the Apostle 2 Cor. 7. 1. Having therefore these promises let us cleanse our selves from all filthines of the flesh and spirit perfecting holiness in the fear of God CHAP. III. A brief Answer to the Arguments of H. D. by him brought to prove Justification before Faith i. e. before the act of Believing Arg. 1. INfants are justified yet do they not believe Rom. 10. 17. therefore some are justified before they believe Answ. This Instance of Infants is not to the point in hand as not in the case of Apostacy and falling from Grace maintained by the Arminians * So neither in this point of Iustification before Faith maintained by the Antinomians For why That Iustification which is in question consisteth in the Remission of actual Transgressions Not so that which Infants receive in their Infancy They are as yet guilty of no more but Original Sin And it is enough for them that the guilt of that is removed of Actual Sin they shall then receive the Remission when they stand in need of it and are fitted for it Objection But whatsoever Infants do receive they receive it without Faith Sol. Hic aqua haeret And Divines do not all agree in expediting themselves Some do not stick to affirm That Infants have Faith I grant it is an hard matter to prove the Negative viz. That Infants have not Faith That Text of Rom. 10. 17. Faith cometh by Hearing is not fully to the purpose If Hearing be restrained to the Ear then all that are born deaf are excluded if extended to any way of acquainting man with the will of God even by the workings of the Spirit who shall exclude Infants As hard a matter it is to prove that Infants have Faith especially if Faith be defined by knowledge perswasion or confidence It is said of Iohn Baptist that he was filled with the holy Ghost This sheweth that Infants are capable of the Spirit but it doth not thereupon follow that they do believe Because though in its actings the Spirit depend not upon the faculties of the soul and their fitness yet doth it not usually prevent them Nor be the actings of Grace ordinarily found but where Age hath added some perfection to the Abilities of Nature All that can be said in this point is this That Infants do receive together with their Iustification the principle of Faith viz. The Spirit of Faith as he is called 2 Cor. 4. 13. This is that which some do call The Seed of Faith or Seminal Faith nor can the term be refused since it is grounded on the phrase of Scripture 1 Pet. 1. 23. and Iohn 3. 9. And so it may be said that Infants have Faith as they have Reason in Actu primo though not in Actu secundo in the seed though not in the flower And this is enough to make them capable of that Iustification which they receive in their infancy consequently though they have it without and before actual Faith yet not before Seminal Faith not before the seed the root the Spirit of Faith 2. Arg. He that is in Christ is Iustified and so Iustified before he do believe Because none can believe before he be in Christ Faith is the fruit of the Spirit Gal. 5. 22. Answ. Grant indeed None can believe before he be in Christ though that Text do not prove it yet he may believe so soon as he is in Christ and full as soon for time as he is Iustified and for order before he be Iustified for understanding whereof know That in the first moment of our Vnion with Christ the Soul hath a Communion of all that floweth from Christ both for Grace and Glory But how In the vertue and power of a Root and Seed from this Union floweth both Grace to enable the soul to do good actions and also Glory to crown and reward each good act that is wrought but each in his own order Ex. gr. The plant engrafted into the stock receiveth from it both sap and fruit Or thus from the vertue of life in the soul doth proceed a power both of Feeding and of Growing not both of them in the same maner for Feeding cometh as an Act Growing as an Effect yea an Effect of this Act so is it here To Believe and To be Justified come from our Union with Christ as indeed all that we have and all that we hope for is from him and without him we can do nothing And in that Union are they folded up as in the root and seed But still to be considered in their natural order in which one is the cause of the other and therefore to be considered in order of Nature before the other what say we that Glorification no less then Iustification doth flow from that Union will you then say that he that is in Christ is glorified yea glorified before he do believe Surely no As none is glorified before he be Iustified so neither is he justified before he be called Rom. 8. 30. In which call if Faith be not included it will not be effectual Thus every thing trust be considered in its own order All these Grace and Glory Faith and the Fruits thereof are rolled up as in a Root and bestowed upon us in our first Union but the explicite production and application of each to the Christian soul is in a just order 3. and 4. Arg. All the Elect of God are Iustified before God for why They cannot be charged with any thing Rom. 8. 33. Their Sins are taken away Isa. 53. 6. Ioh. 1. 29. 1. Pet. 2. 24. And this before they believe For some of them do not yet believe Answer All the Elect of God even they that yet have no being in the World yet when they are look't upon as justified
persons are considered of God as believers no less then justified before the World they are fore-seen as believing before fore-seen as justified Because in the World till they believe they are not justified still that that in the execution of the decree hath the precedency is considered in the decree as fore-going Sin before Condemnation Faith before Iustification The elect have their sins taken away before they do believe But how Not otherwise save in the purpose of God and the purchase of Christ Else what use nay what sense in those Exhortations Act. 2. 38. Repent and be Baptized for the Remission of sins Act. 3. 19. Repent and be converted that your sins may be blotted out Act. 22. 16. Arise be baptized and wash away thy sins is it not evident that the sins of these were not as then blotted out and washed away that they might use these means to compass this end The Texts aleaged for Proof of the Argument speak not home to the point intended That of Isa. 53. 6. onely sheweth that designation of Christ to be the sacrifice of Expiation Not is there more in the 6. verse then was expressed in the 5. verse He was wounded for our Transgressions this onely excepted That v. 6. sheweth That Christ should make peace for us by the way of a sacrifice even the sacrifice of himself upon whom God would lay the iniquities of us all as Aaron laid the iniquities of the Children of Israel upon the Goat Lev. 16. 21. Say the same of Joh. 1. 29. It sheweth whom God had appointed to that work And the Text of 1 Pet. 2. 24. sheweth That he hath executed his Office but none of these Texts do say any thing concerning the benefit thereof redounding to any one in particular whether without or before or after Faith Truth it is That this was said and done long before many of the Elect did believe So also before many of them had any need of Faith and Iustification even before they had a being Nay in that Text Rom. 8. 33. brought to prove the Elect justified because Nothing can be laid to their charge It is evident that the Apostle speaks of the Elect now made actual Believers For that phrase of laying any thing to the charge of Gods Elect doth presuppose them living and standing before the Tribunal consequently actual Believers For against the Elect till actually believing doth Satan lay no accusation And we doubt not to affirm That the Elect of God believing in Christ and laying hold on him by Faith are so justified before God that in vain shall Satan seek to charge any thing upon them But till then notwithstanding the Purpose of God and the Purchase of Christ yet are they not actually discharged of their sins nor actually justified in the sight of God 5. Arg. We were made sinners in Adam before we had done any evil and so we are made righteous in Christ before we have done any good This is the Assertion of the Apostle Rom. 5. 18 19. Ans. The Text of the Apostle doth only set down this That as Adam is the Author of condemnation to all that be condemned so Christ is the Author of Iustification to all that are justified But as to the time when this is done in the one or the other the Text speaketh nothing Grant indeed That in respect of the Merit of Christ it may be said that we are justified in the sight of God before any good be done by us but now in respect of actual Application to particular persons as no man is condemned till he have an actual being and be found a sinner in himself so neither is any man justified before he have an actual being yea an actual being in Christ and in him made righteous Condemnation presupposeth sin in the party condemned and Iustification presupposeth Grace and Faith in the party justified 6. Arg. In Christ crucified before we believed was full satisfaction made Heb. 10. 11 14. And God was contented to rest in that satisfaction Mat. 3. ult. Isa. 53. 11. Therefore there will follow perfect Remission of sins Ans. No doubt of it perfect Remission will follow because satisfaction is made and accepted But when Not till the sinner need it not till he be fitted for it not till he have a being in Christ not till he come to Christ that he may receive In very deed the satisfaction was neither intended nor accepted but upon that condition That whoso will have it must come to Christ for it Hence they in Ioh. 5. 40. are blamed in that they would not come to Christ that they might have life That Text of Isa. 53. 11. is mis-applied to the Father being indeed spoken of Christ himself 7. Arg. Either we are justified in the sight of God before we believe or else even the Elect of God are for some time hated of him For he hateth all the workers of iniquity but certainly the Elect of God are at no time hated of God If so Then God should hate to day and love to morrow with much changeableness of Affection Nay more Gods love to us shall depend upon our love to God Ans. Set this down for a truth 1. That God hateth all the workers of iniquity whatsoever Psal. 5. 5. 2. That the Elect of God are loved of him from all eternity Ier. 31. 3. 3. That there is no variableness nor shadow of change in God Iam. 1. 17. 4. That we love him because he loved us first Now if there seem any contrariety in these laid together we are forced to some distinctions by which a commodious interpretation may be set down So then consider of these Explications 1. The love and hatred of God to the Creature may be considered either in the purpose of God or in the execution of that purpose this execution is in the effects of love and hatred The purpose of God is this to appoint the Creature to be the object upon which in time he wil exercise the effects of love or hatred in this purpose of God the Elect are always Loved never Hated nor doth God vary and change in this his purpose nor doth this purpose of his depend upō the foresight of any good in man 2. In the execution of this purpose the suspension of the Effects and Fruits of Love hath the name of Hatred And God may be said to hate them as the Husband that Wife from whom he with draweth the Effects of Love Now in this doth God walk oftentimes according to the present disposition of the Creature wheresoever God findeth sin he hateth it sin is properly the Object of Gods Hatred sin I say not the Creature and if this sin be in a person appointed to love though he will not change his purpose yet will he suspend all effects and fruit of love yea and put forth the effects of hatred until the party do part with his sin Contrarily wheresoever he findeth any good he loveth it yea
perfect peace except there come in also the evidence of inherent Qualifications The voice of Pardon is not the voice of the spirit except when it speaks to a Heart prepared and fitted for it Then only is it true when it falls upon a Penitent soul a Repenting sinner otherwise it is the suggestion of Satan Again the subscription of Faith is then a ground of comfort when it is accompanied with such inherent Qualifications as do certainly proclaim the work of the sanctifying spirit in the Heart otherwise it is but Presumption and rash Boldness The ground of all this is in the nature of this Testimony of the spirit It is not denied But that the testimony of the Spirit is the chief and principal assurance of our Adoption that without it the soul is not finally rid of fears that when it cometh it taketh away all fears and doubts But this is that which we are to nore that this is rather an Attestation then a Testimony a secondary not the first deponent is not this rightly concluded from that of Rom. 8. 16. The Spirit witnesseth with our Spirit where we have two witnesses joyning together their Testimonies to assert this truth That we are the Sons of God Two I say viz. Our spirit and the spirit of God the witness of our spirit i. e. of our conscience is the first The spirit of God is the second His work is not {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} but {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} to witness together with our Spirit i. e. To confirm and ratifie what that hath asserted So that indeed the evidencing of this Testimony of the spirit is from the Testimony of our own conscience If this do not first speak and conclude that other of the spirit speaks not at all Now the Testimony of the conscience is the conclusion of that practical Syllogism and the certainty of this conclusion depends upon the verity of the Assumption which mentioneth the work of grace in the Heart So then let it be the care of the Christian to make good the verity of the Assumption that he may truly say I do repent I am led by the spirit I do believe and rest upon Christ c. This shall not only afford him comfort by the conclusion but also assure him that he is not mis-led by the suggestion of Satan but guided by the spirit to rest upon that Testimony of his Adoption and Justification CHAP. VI Touching sin in the Conscience of the Believer The Doctrine of the Antinomians in this Point examined and found insufficient to satisfie the Conscience The right way of satisfying the Conscience and of taking away the scruple of sin set down THe Prophet Isaiah cap. 53. 11. having set down this That Christ shall Iustifie many addeth this as a reason For he shall bear their iniquities A phrase borrowed from the Levitical Priesthood in which the sacrificed Beast did bear the iniquity of the party that brought it his confession was that he had deserved death by his sin yet now casting himself upon the mercy of God he desired that the guilt of his sin might be transferred and laid upon that sacrifice and by the Blood of it he might finde Atonement So then the meaning of that saying of the Prophet is That Christ shall as a sacrifice of expiation take upon him punishment due to the sin of many Thus by bearing the punishment doth he take away the sin of his people This doth not please some the Antinomian Doctors by name The word iniquities is found in the 6. Verse of the Chapter And upon that Text one of them Dr. Crisp doth contend much for this That not onely the punishment of sin but the iniquity it self was laid upon Christ Not the guilt only but the fault it self His reason is Because otherwise it had been injustice in God to bruise hiâ— I should not much stick either at the Doctrine or the Reason but that I finde that the end of this for which they contend is not found viz. To shew the reason why it is said in Jer. 50. 20. That the iniquity of Iacob the Elect of God is sought for but cannot be found viz. Because God hath conveyed their iniquities away from the sinner and laid them upon the Back of Christ the which he seeketh to illustrate by him that to help a theef and deliver him from the danger of the Hue and Cry conveyeth away out of the thiefs house the stoln goods so that they are not found upon him It is not we see for nothing that these men depart from the received expressions of other Divines Iunius reads that sixth Verse thus Facit ut incurrat pena The punishment of us all met upon him answerable to Verse 5. The chastisement of our peace was laid upon him The Genevenses note is The punishment of our iniquitie and not the fault it self And Deodate saith Not the transgression nor the fault but the Bond by which we were lyable to Gods Iustice and the punishment of it Christ being our surety Amesius saith That the Imputation of our sin could agree to Christ in none other sense then this that he should undergo the punishment due to our sins See his Medulla Theol. Par. 1. cap. 6. But to let this pass Upon this truth and text That God hath laid upon Christ the iniquity of us all and that accordingly Christ hath born our iniquities A question is moved How then cometh it to pass that sin doth still trouble and terrifie the Conscience of many To this Question the Antinomians do Answer That many do trouble themselves needlesly that there is indeed no sin in the Conscience of the Believer but that men do put it in and so vex themselves without cause One of their Doctors out of that Text of Isa. 53. 6. The Lord hath laid on him the iniquities of us all hath delivered these Doctrines 1. That it is iniquity it self and not barely the punishment that is laid upon Christ 2. This iniquity of ours is really transacted and laid upon him truely and not only by so thinking 3. The laying of iniquity upon Christ is the Lords own act it is his prerogative alone to do it 4. This act is not now to be done but it is done already 5. This grace of laying iniquity upon Christ is appliable by forgiveness of sin to persons before the least measure of Sanctification Points of Doctrine in which we cannot readily suspect any iniquity at least they might pass with a favorable interpretation But by the conclusions thence deduced we cannot but see that there is a snake in the grass Hence he inferreth 1. That the reason why believers walk in bitterness of Spirit is because they imagine sin in the Conscience whereas indeed believers have no sin at all wasting their Conscience or lying as a burthen upon them 2. That our own performances faith and repentance have no hand at all in laying sin upon
Christ Nor is there any other end of our Faith save onely to manifest what is done long ago by God and Christ 3. That we may save all our care and fear for the work is done to our hand yea to think that we must take pains to get pardon is a deceitful Imagination 4. That our Righteousness may hinder our closing with Christ so may our sinfulness c. Not much unlike is the dealing of another of the same Society Who having set these two truths 1. That Christ hath taken away sin out of the sight of God by a sacrifice the effect whereof is Atonement and Peace 2. That he hath taken sin also out of the Conscience that so we might have the answer of a good Conscience and this is the effect of our Faith Act. 15. 9. Hence he draweth this conclusion That it is in effect the Doctrine of Antichrist the Man of sin whose design is to set up again what Christ hath destroyed To perswade any that sin is not taken away out of Gods sight or out of the Conscience till the work of Baptism and of Repentance To say That Baptism taketh away sin out of the Conscience Or that Repentance washeth away sin That no forgiveness of sin with God before Repentance Nay he closeth up the discourse with this speech Doth any declare Repentance to be a mean to obtain Remission It is a footstep of Antichrist These inserences being so dissonant from the truth give us cause to suspect the grounds on which they are builded and upon Examination we finde that the Explication of the Points delivered is not sound Touching the first man Who from that text God hath laid on him grounded those Points aforementioned viz. That God hath laid upon Christ all the sins of the Elect and that therefore men do needlesly trouble themselves by putting them again into the Conscience And that they should rest upon this assured ground that all their sins are so done away that there is no need of Repentance and Humiliation for them This man I say either did not throughly look into the text to finde out the true meaning of that phrase or else did willingly neglect it as not fit for his purpose For I desire it may be seriously considered whether that phrase The Lord hath laid upon him doth intend any more then what St. Paul hath expressed in that verb {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} Rom. 3. 25. God hath set him forth or pre-ordained him to be a propitiation in which respect it is that he is called The Lamb of God that taketh away the sins of the World i. e. The Lamb the sacrifice of Expiation which God hath appointed for that end And so the words of the Prophet do give us this as the intention of God that though we every one of us have gone astray and so incurred the just wrath and displeasure of God yet doth not God lay the punishment of our transgression upon our own persons but hath appointed him the Lord Christ to bear the punishment and satisfie the Iustice of God so that we do make the fault and he doth bear the blame But now as touching the mean and maner how the fruit of this sacrifice shall redound to us whether absolutely without any intervenient act of man or conditionally in and upon mans recourse to Christ this is not determined in that text but to be fought elswhere Consequently to that which he urgeth That it is Gods own act to lay iniquity upon Christ and that it is done long since We may Reply This is little to the point the Pre-ordination of Christ in this office is Gods own act man hath no hand in it No nor in the purchase of pardon that is Christs own act Both these are done long since yet this hinders not but that in the Application of it to man which cannot be till man have a being it hinders not I say but that man may have his Act as indeed he hath The which is evident by that Analogy which holdeth betwixt the Type and the Truth the sins of the people were not laid upon the Sacrifice but by the hand of Man God indeed appointed the Sacrifices for Expiation and in that sence may be said to lay the iniquity of the sinner upon the sacrifice but beside this the man that brought the sacrifice was to lay his hand upon it And yet more evident is this in that Doctrinal Ceremony of the Scape-goat in Lev. 16. 22. Till the Priest by Confession of the iniquities and transgressions of the people had laid them on him the Scape-Goat did not bear them away So that Man also hath his act in laying iniquity upon Christ no less then God not in the preparation of the price but in the way of Application Adde this that the words Vs all which he applyeth to sinners contending against the necessity of inherent Qualifications in any to dispose them and make them fit to receive the benefit of redemption purchased these words I say are not Universal but only in relation to the Church of God So that till a man be of the Church and in the Number of Believers he may not include himself in the list of them to whom it doth belong For why If it belong to sinners as sinners then to all sinners And so he will lay the Ground for an Universal Redemption which I believe he doth not intend If this Redemption belong not to all as sinners and yet the terms of the promise run in the Universal then some act of Man sanctified by the spirit of God must come in between by which he may be included before he conclude for himself Truth it is That no sin may keep off the penitent soul from closing with Christ And if in saying that this grace is appliable by forgiveness of sin to persons before the least measure of sanctification if he intend no more but this that such is the vertue and value of Christs Sacrifice that no sin how great soever can hinder the hope of Pardon in case he come in and apply himself to Christ I know no man that will not subscribe No sin may may keep off the Penitent but till man be Penitent no man may close with Christ nor conclude to himself the Remission of sin The reason hereof is because mens names are not set down in the Book of God They must know that the conclusion of Comfort is by the way of a practical Syllogism in which alway the Assumption is the Testimony of the Conscience touching that work of Grace in the heart to which the promise is made ex gr. He that believeth in the name of the Son of God shall not perish If we confess our sins he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins Here is the Promise made to the Penitent believer now saith the Conscience I do believe I do confess my sins this is the Testimony of the sanctified Conscience speaking
the work of the spirit upon the heart of man Hence the conclusion of Comfort is This promise is mine My Portion is in it and hence both peace and joy in the Holy Ghost But now look upon the Antinomian ground of Comfort and let even reason judge whether it can produce any true consolation God hath laid the Iniquity of Sinners upon Christ God justified the ungodly But I am a sinner I am ungodly therefore the Benefit is mine Is it not evident that except all sinners promiseuously receive this benefit there is no certainty of Comfort in the conclusion If it may appear as who doubteth but that it may appear that there be many ungodly that never had nor shall have benefit by Christ Is not the conclusion uncertain True saith the Author aforesaid Names of particular persons are not written in the word But what hinders that thou maist not have part in Christ the Pardon is to all theeves may not each particular take his part This general tender of free Grace is as sufficient for satisfaction of mans Spirit as if his name were written Well But this Pardon is to all Theeves is it not if they will come in And surely it is intended that they come in as Penitents not as perverse rebellious Persons and till they come in thus can they claim the benefit of the Kings pardon And therefore whereas he addeth Hath the Lord given thee an heart to come in that thou fain wouldest have Christ if thou durst it is enough He should deny himself if he should cast thee off This is a precious truth if rightly understood But in his Intention it halteth For besides this that when God giveth an heart to come in to Christ he giveth an holy heart an humble and penitent heart an heart no less ready to take Christ for a Lord then for a Saviour Nay indeed more desirous of this then of that Not that he might merit favor by his service but out of the abundance of Love to Christ he is much desirous that Christ should now be glorified by him as formerly he hath been dishonored before himself be glorified by Christ Besides this I say the conclusion of comfort grounded upon the general tender of free-grace is not by the Assumption I am a sinner I am a theef But by this I do come in Hereupon it followeth that he may not cast me off And this coming in what is it but to believe in the name of Christ Joh. 1. 12. And what is that but to rest upon him for salvation So then the general tender of free-grace made to sinners is conditional as touching the benefit of Pardon viz. If they come in and cast themselves upon the mercy of God in Christ there is hope of Pardon And indeed it may appear that this is that which the Doctor did intend howsoever in the prosecution of the point his words did seem to drive farther for thus he concludeth in one of his Sermons So then notwithstanding any sinfulness which thou findest in thy self thou maist boldly come to Christ and commit thy self unto him as an All-sufficient Saviour Touching the second Author who hath more covertly and more cautelously delivered himself he sets it down as a Doctrine of Antichrist to say That sin is not taken away out of the Conscience till the work of Baptism and of Repentance Particularly touching Baptism this he censureth as a Doctrine of the Man of Sin That Baptism doth take away sin out of the Conscience and out of the sight of God And well he may if it be maintained in that sense which he opposeth viz. As an Ordinance which hath in it a vertue and efficacy of taking away sins not derived from and subservient to the blood of Christ In this sense if any do maintain any efficacy in that Sacrament let him be Anathema But if it be no derogation to the spirit that the Ministery of the word is said to have an effectual working power in the conversion of men and causing them by Repentance to return to God In as much as the efficacy of the Ministery is subservient to the spirit as the Instrument by which the spirit worketh Why is it derogatory to the Blood of Christ that the Sacrament hath an effectual power in this act of taking away sin out of the conscience In as much as it is intended hereby to ascribe no efficacy at all to it save only as an Ordinance of application yea and this also subservient to the spirit The blood of Christ is that that taketh away sin out of the Conscience But then doth it perform this spiritual cure when it is applyed And the Sacrament is a mean of application A mean I say by which the spirit applyeth the blood of Christ unto the Conscience In which respect by a communication of Phrases it is said To wash away Sin Act. 22. 16. And God is said to save us by the washing of Regeneration Titus 3. 5. And Christ is said to cleanse his Church by the washing of water Ephesians 5. 26. Not as if any vertue were in the Water which Saint Peter denyeth 1 Pet. 3. 21. But because the Blood of Christ which hath that vertue in it is applied in and by the Administration of that Sacrament And therefore for him to say That if Baptism taketh away sin out of the Conscience then hath not Christ finished the taking away sin by his one and alone offering This I say is not to the purpose in as much as beside the paying of the price there must also be an Application of it otherwise the work is not done A wound in the flesh is not cured by the preparation of an effectual Plaister but by the Application of it to the wound Nor can there be any perfection to the creature without the Application of this price of this Plaister This he was not ignorant of and thereupon seeketh to make his advantage for thus he argueth Is there saith he any perfection to the Creature without Application Surely no and yet Heb. 10. 14. By one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified What he would hence conclude I see not Will he from the word Hath perfected conclude the Application already past viz. From the very hour of Christs Passion How can that be Is there any here said to be perfected by that one sacrifice but they that are sanctified Are any sanctified but by the Communion of Christs spirit Doth not this Communion presuppose an Union Is not that Union with Christ sealed to us in our Baptism Sanctified persons then are perfected by that one sacrifice Yet how perfected All at once Not so But the ground-work of their perfect consummation is laid in that one sacrifice And so laid that in due time by the vertue and power thereof without any other offering they shall be perfected The true meaning therefore of them that say if any do say it in those terms that sin is not taken
away out of the Conscience till by the Sacrament of Baptism it be taken away Their meaning I say is no more but this That till the Elect of God be really and actually united to Christ they are not actually made partakers of that Remission which was purchased for them by that sacrifice In which respect they do call upon Converts and Believers as did Ananias upon Paul Arise and be Baptized and wash away thy sins A text plainly proving that Baptism hath some kinde of work and efficacy in washing away sin He Objecteth That these words were spoken to a Believer Consequently If Paul was already a Believer and yet his sins not washed away until he were Baptized Then it will follow that sin is not alway pardoned to a Believer But this Objection doth nothing hinder the Conclusion set down Because Though Paul as a Believer had right to the benefits of Christ by vertue of the Promise made to Believers yet could he not have fruition of them till he had taken possession of Christ by being incorporated into him Faith is the hand of man to receive but the Sacrament is the hand of the spirit to convey unto us Christ and all his benefits Might not he have learned this out of that text He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved had he well marked it If there be nothing added by Baptism to complete the state of a Christian why is it enjoyned I demand Whether a Believer suppose him to live and dye in the wilful neglect of that Sacrament can be saved Nay more suppose him to have been an Alien a stranger or as Paul a Persecuter of the Church of God but now a Convert as Paul was nay a professor and zealous Preacher of Christ and so to have washt away his sins in the sense that this man giveth of Ananias words The sense of those words of Ananias which H. D. giveth is this Break off thy sins It is a washing in conversation sc. To manifest to the world that thou art another man And he noteth That one washed in respect of Gods imputation and washed in Conscience in respect of manifestation and apprehension of the grace of God in Jesus Christ may yet be exhorted to wash in respect of Conversation By which it seemeth that there was no farther use of Baptism to Paul at this time save only to manifest to the world that he was a Convert which I suppose is so sensless a position that it needeth no Refutation I say then suppose a man thus to have washt away his sins Can all this profit him to salvation if he wilfully reject the Sacrament of Baptism Can he by his profession and Preaching obtain a part in Christ and a pardon of this wilfulness Surely except the Church of God in all ages hath hitherto wanted light and sight to see the true meaning of the words that text of our Saviour Ioh. 3. 5. reprehending Nicodemus for his backwardness in this Duty is very clear and evident for the proof of the Negative viz. That such a man so wilfully rejecting the Sacrament cannot plead his Faith nor have entrance into the Kingdom of Heaven This man is not more out in the point of Baptism then he is in the next point touching Repentance This doth he account a Doctrine of the Man of Sin to say That Repentance doth wash away sin that Repentance is a mean to obtain Remission that there is no forgiveness with God before Repentancce Touching that first Expression We do not say that Repentance doth wash away sin in any other sense but this That there is no forgiveness of sin to the impenitent It is necessary as a passive Qualification It hath no efficacy in procuring pardon or perfecting forgiveness more then this that it fitteth the person to receive it And this is no Doctrine of the Man of Sin it was the Doctrine of Moses and the Prophets True saith he it was so in the Old Testament Contrition and Confession went before Remission But in the New Testament Remission doth go before Contrition This is soon said But how is it proved What text of Scripture what Argument from any text of Scripture The worldly Tabernacle of Moses was it not a figure and patern of Heavenly things May we not see as the mercy of God shadowed forth in those sacrifices of Expiation so the Duty of the sinner expressed in those Legal Purifications To this he Answereth That Contrition went before Remission in our High Priest He was bruised broken slain before any Remission This no man doubteth But we demand Whether as then Contrition was required of the People before by their sacrifice they could have Remission So now also it be not required that Contrition be found in us before we obtain Remission by the sacrisice of Christ At no hand will he endure to hear of this Christ saith he confesseth our sins offereth for our sins maketh peace through his Blood and calleth upon us to believe this Peace and Atonement made This we deny not But still insist upon this Whether Contrition be not required of Believers in the New Testament as well as of them in the Old Testament to make them capable of Remission If not What is there in the New Testament to answer to that figure I finde it interserted in a parenthesis That Preist sacrifices and people were all of them figures of Christ What the meaning of it should be I cannot guess except it be this That Christ must be all and do all Upon him must lie no less the work of Repentance for sin then of satisfaction Thus shall the burthen be increased to him that so it may be cased to the sinner had the Scripture revealed it so to be we had received it now we may not Well it is that Christ hath done for us what we could not viz. He hath made satisfaction It is not much if he require of us what we may well do viz. To be truely contrite and penitent for our sins But saith he Faith which is the knowledge of Remission must needs go before Contrition else would it be sin For whatsoever is not of Faith is sin Rom. 14. 23. I might justly reply and say Like point like proof Neither is justifying Faith the knowledge of Remission Nor doth that text of St. Paul speak of justifying Faith But this I say That if Faith be the knowledge of Remission viz. fully past and already in possession it doth rather take away Contrition then call for it There is no place for sorrow in Heaven the spirits of just men made perfect who are in full possession of Remission do not now any more weep and shed tears for the sins that they have committed He addeth We do not therefore believe Remission because we repent But therefore repent because we believe Remission I Answer We do both we believe Remission because we do repent not as if there were any merit in our repentance to deserve it