Joh. 37.10 Rom. 8.1 Besides the Apostle in his Epistle to the Romans where he is more large in the vindication of his Doctrine concerning Justification by Faith then elsewhere in any place speaketh expresly of the constituting i. e. of the actual making of men just or righteous c. 5.19 that is the investing men with the state of Justification but no where mentioneth any thing concerning the manifestation of such a state And the truth is that the contest about Justification wherein be ingaged against the Jews with so much zeal so much ardencie of desire to convince them with such variety of exquisite and ponderous arguing to bring the truth to light against which they contended with him the contest I say had hardly been worth all this oleum opera all this solemnitie and height of ingagement by such a man had it been onely about the manifestation and not about the way and means of procuring a justified estate An account of this assertion might be given if need were Another thing worthy consideration about the great Subject of the Treatise is whether if so why justification or Forgiveness of sins is ascribed as well to such acts of Faith which do not at least directly or immediately relate unto Christ or unto the death of Christ as unto these which do Thou wilt sinde here more produced from the Scriptures to prove the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of such an ascription then as farr as my reading and memory can inform me is to be met with elsewhere and as much said upon a rational and probable account for clearing the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or reason of it as may be sufficient to quiet the thoughts of men in the case For it doth not bear hard at all either upon the Wisedom of God or upon any of his words in the Scripture to conceive that any act from a believing frame or disposition of soul in man towards God should reduce him under the Divine Decree of Justification and so interesse him in the benefit or blessing hereof considering that every such act doth arguitive as the School-men speak that is virtually and consequentially comprehend in it such an act of believing also which is directly and immediately acted upon Christ or his death It is a rule in the Civil Law â—avores sunt ampliandi the meaning is that such passages or clauses in the Law which were intended in way of favour or benefit unto men ought to be interpreted in the largest and most comprehensive sense that the words will any way bear as on the other hand there is this rule In odiosis stricte facienda est interpretatio Such sayings in the Law which concern the punishment of persons in one kind or other are to be understood in as narrow and restrained a sense as the words will permit Doubtless these notions for the expounding of Laws both in the one case and the other are equitable agreeable to reason and the light of nature and consequently are to be found in the nature of God himself who as the Scripture informeth us made man in his own image or likeness and vested the same or the like principles or impressions of Reason Equity and Understanding in him with those that were in himself So that it need be no great matter of wonder that God should be very indulgent and large in interpreting such clauses in the Gospel which relate unto the justification and salvation of men and consequently should finde justifying Faith in such acts of believing which may any waies even by the most abstruse subtile or profound way of arguing be conceived to evince or comprehend it Whether upon every reiterated or repeated act of believing the believer is justified afresh if so what doth a supervenient act of Justification profit him that is perfectly justified already or how is there place for the effect of such an act as that of Justification in him all whose sins by means of his being in Christ are already pardoned by God or if not what should be the reason why one act of the same Faith should not justifie as well as another Are problemes worthy the consideration and inquiry of an ingenuous Student in the mysterious science of Justification These also or some of them are ingeniously discussed and endeavoured to be resolved in this Treatise Doubtless every new act of believing doth not procure or bring unto him that so acteth a new justification properly so called and which consisteth in remission of sins Nor is this any disparagement to an after-act of believing in comparison of any former or the first act in this kinde by which Justification in this sense was obtained nor doth it argue any whit less acceptance of it with God For as the saying in natural Philosophy is Quiequid recipitur recipitur ad modum recipientis the qualification or condition of the Subject doth often if not alwaies modifie the effect of the act that is exercised or acted upon it So he who by virtue of a former act of believing remains and is in a complete state of Justification all his sins being forgiven him by God is not capable of receiving the forgiveness of them at least in the same sense or kind the second time because he needeth iâ— not For it being unpossible for God in respect of the infinity of his Wisedom to do any thing superstuous no creature can be in a regular capacity of receiving any matter of grace or favour from him unless in one respect or other it standeth in need of it Every repeated act of Faith doth indeed obtain from God another kind of Justification I mean Approbation which is oft in Scripture expressed and this without any great acyrology or impropriety of speech by the word Justification For though men were approved of him before as well as justified yet Approbation being susceptive of magis and minus or of degrees which Justification strictly taken is not they may be oft approved yet not often in that sense justified their former justification remaining That forgiveness of sins which Christ teacheth us to ask of God dayly either imports the continuation of the first act whereby he justified us which it is meet we should ask of him in respect of our new and dayly transgressions or which I rather conceive yet with submission Gods forbearing to punish us with temporal punishments for our dayly sins being at liberty we know thus to punish us notwithstanding our justified estate if he be not intreated by us in this respect to forgive us Other great and high concernments the care of repeated acts of belicoing which are not proper to be mentioned here 〈…〉 in Christ or in God by means of Christ for the Scripture useth both expressions indifferently qualifieth and inricheth the soul with all principles of righteousness and goodness and so constitutes a person inherently just and righteous some of late have conceived that in this notion or consideration it justifieth and that God
looking upon man as inwardly just and righteous by the worthy operation of Faith in and upon his heart and soul pronounceth him accordingly to be a just and righteous person With this conceit thou will â—ade the Author of the Treatise cast into somewhat a like passion with Paul at Athens when he beheld the City 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 given to Idolatry the Text saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his spirit was sharply-provoked or stirred within him Act. 17.16 I found him not so warm at any other work in all his Book as in his wrestlings against this Opinion His zeal in the case is very pardonable if not commendable rather the matter being exceeding weighty For if that be all the Justification we receive from God to be pronounced just or righteous by him according to that righteousness which he seeth truly and really inherent in us and for the same what becomes of our sins Are these still reteined and unforgiven Or if they be forgiven is the forgiveness of them nothing no part of our Justification And if they be forgiven are they forgiven for the sake of that inherent righteousness for and according unto which saith the Opinion God pronounceth us righteous that is justifieth us Doth not this notion wholly evacuate the first-born inter Magnalia Dei the most adorable Vouchsasement that ever the Grace and Love or Bounty of God issued forth unto the world I mean the propitiatory Sucrifice of Christ Besides if God shall pronounce us righteous onely for and according to that righteousness which he seeth and knoweth to be in us and this be our Justification the Grace of God will have but a saint and feeble hand in our Justification For it is but a kinde of debt for him that certainly knoweth another man to be righteous to give testimory unto him accordingly and to pronounce him such upon occasion But for the further eviction of this so Anti-Evangelical a notion I referr thee to the Treatise it self Onely if thou pleasest bear me a few words about what I conceive may be the occasion at least in part of the sad mistake When God in the Scripture calleth or pronounceth men righteous for and according to that righteousness which is really and truly vested in them 1. He speaketh not of an absolute district and perfect righteousness or such which without any more ade giveth them a right of claim to Heaven but first of such a righteousness which is inchoate only and wants many degrees of its perfect growth and stature admitting no small mixture of unrighteousness with it according to these and many like Scriptures In many things we offend all Jam. 3.2 If we say that we have no sin we deceive our selves c. 1 Joh. 1.8.10 Who can understand his errors Cleanse thou me from secret faults Psal 19.12 There is not a just man on earth that doth good and sinneth not Eccles 7.20 There is no man that sinneth not 1 King 8.46 Secondly He speaketh of a comparative righteousness pronouncing the Saints righteous viz. in respect of the world which as John saith lyeth in wickedness Again 2. When God pronounceth Believers righteous for and according to that good and righteous frame of heart which he seeth in them he doth not justifie them in the sense of the word Justifie in the Questions and Controversies about the justification of a sinner namely sensu forensi as persons are said to be justified from Crimes laid to their charge by a Judge but sensu morali as when persons that are approved by whomsoever for any thing either done by them or known or supposed to he in them are said to be justified by them The word Justifie is frequently used in this sense in the Scriptures Job 27.5 33.32 11.2 Prov. 17.15 compared with Ch. 24.34 28.4 Matt. 11.19 Luke 7.35 Matth. 12.37 with many others Whereas when God is said to justifie those that believe with that Justification which is said to be of or unto life i.e. unto salvation Rom. 5.18 he is said to forgive their iniquities to cover their sins not to impute sin unto them c. Rom. 4.5 compared with 6.7 8. Acts 13.38 with 39 See also Eph. 1.7 Col. 1.14 Luke 1.77 Rom. 3.25 with 8.26 The forgiveness of sins is indeed a most absolute district compleat righteousness in its kind having no mixture or tincture of any weakness or imperfection in it and as to the benefit and comfort of all that receive it comprehending in it the constant observation of the whole Law of God to every the least iota or tittle of it In respect of this most exquisite absolute and divine perfection of it as well as in others it may well be term'd as it is Rom. 3.21 22. twice together THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF God It is like the non-advertency of these particulars might render the Judgements of some learned men the more obnoxious to the error now impleaded Yet further he that desires to understand himself like a Christian in so material a piece of his profession as Justification had need be able and expert to distinguish the terms and phrases which frequently occur in the Scriptures relating to it out of their ambiguities and diversities of significations and imports and so likewise to know when different words or expressions are the same in sence and import either expressly or implicitly and by consequence otherwise they will never sit easia and light some in their judgment about many particulars belonging to it I must not stand to instance in particulars I have already exceeded the intended proportion of my Advertisement But in this concernment also thou wilt find the Treatise at hand a good Benefactor unto thee This will inform thee that the word Righteousness doth not always signifie the principle or virtue of righteousness inherent in the soul but sometimes that which we may call an adherent or a relative righteousness viz. a non-imputation of sin or the forgiveness of sin called also as we lately shewed the Righteousness of God and sometimes the Righteousness of Faith that is which is obtained by Faith So again it will acquaint thee with different significations of the words Just Justifie Justification and some others by the knowledge whereof the rough wayes of the study of Justification will be made smooth But the carriages or passages of the Treatise hitherto pointed at are in the eye of my comparing faculty but as Pictures of Silver the Apple of Gold amongst them and which to me is vena basilica the Master-Vein of the Discourse is that quarter of it in which the Evangelical purity and simplicity of Justification is asserted against the importune yet subtile and close insinuations of a legal spirit For as I know no Doctrine greater then that of Justification within the whole Hemisphere of Christian Profession as before was hinted so neither do I apprehend any thing more threatning the world with the loss of the great benefit and blessing of this great
what other soever actions or acts can be certainly ascribed unto God with relation to his own Essence but with relation to his creatures no other can be conceived but in the way of purposing and decreeing what he would be pleased to do in time 't is very true what that Scripture assirms that known unto God are all his works from the beginning of he world Acts 15.18 that is which he intended to work But that God should be said to do any action adextra that is without himself such as Justification is which is terminated upon another person without the compass of his own Essence when yet there was nothing but himself in being is to me a contradiction God might indeed in the eternal counsel of his own uncontroulable Wil Pleasure PURPOSE to juscifie such and such persons after he had made them but what is this to actual Justification It may be as wel said in my mind that the World was created faom eternity because God purposed in his Eternal Counsels to create the World as it can be said that any were justified from eternity because God purposed from all eternity to justifie them Purpose and Decree is one thing Acting and Performance is another 3. I cannot understand any countenance which this opinion hath from Scripture when the Scripture comes to speak of Justification it expresseth it self as of an action done in time onely Rom. 4.3 What saith the Scripture Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for righteousness Ver. 10. How was it thon reckoned WHEN he was in circumcision or in uncircumcision Not in circumcision but in uncircumcision that is in the time of his uncircumcision Abraham is not said to have been justified from eternity but upon his actual believing and this actual believing was in the time of his uncircumcision 4. Seeing justification follows onely upon Faith as the Scripture tells us Justification cannot be before Faith Now Faith is onely in time therefore Justification was not in Eternity which was before all time I shall trouble my self with no more as to the answer of the first question Whether Justification be in Eternity or in Time Now follows the second question If it be in time at what time is it And how often is it Once onely or oftner Here are two questions more in one 1. At what time is it Now for answer Seeing that the righteousness of Faith is the righteousness which God alone accepts unto Justification therefore Justification commenceth onely from the time of our believing When was Abraham justified Why when he believed that therefore is the time of Justification its beginning The Question therefore now before us is onely this Whether this one act of Justification which presently follows upon our act of believing serves for the justification of our persons as long as we live or whether there be any repetition of God's act of Justification upon our persons afterwards Now for answer to this which is indeed no contemptible Quest I say 1. That indeed the first act of Justification when Divine approbation comes upon us according to the Law and Statute of the New-Covenant Acts 13.39 That by him all that believe are justified putsi us into a state of favour and if there be no intercision in the state which the Arminians hold there may be this first act is the great and famous act that makes us happy and blessed But yet 2dly I hold that seeing Justification chiefly consists in pardoning of sins according to that Scripture Acts 13.38 39. Be it known unto you therefore men and brethren that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins and by him all that believe are JUSTIFIED FROM ALL THINGS FROM WHICH YE COULD NOT BE JUSTIFIED by the Law of Moses every renewed act of Pardon is a renewed act of Justification for though the first act of God's justifying us upon our turning to God do acquit us from all our sins till that moment yet every new sin brings a new guilt for which we might justly be condemned without a new act of justifying grace and though every new sin doth not put us out of the state of justification yet it requires a new act of justifying grace for the continuing the state and this makes the Advocateship of Christ necessary to be continued who when any Saint commits a sin he interposeth with his Father that upon his repentance a pardon may be issued forth in the Court of heaven for that soul as to that sin This I hold necessary even for every sinfull infirmity of any Saint of God that is I hold Christ's intercession and our habitual repentance at least and faith necessary chough many times there cannot be actual repentance and faith for pardon as in the case of secret and unobserved sins But yet even in such cases our habitual and general repentance is necessary together with Christ's intercession and a renewed act of pardon unto our justification * I would not be thought to make this continued justification which consists in continued pardon to be of like consâ—teration with the first act of pardouing justifying grace at first believing I only contend for this That it is true and necessary justification And in extraordinary cases the truth of my assertion will be much more visible for when any Saint commits such a great sin as according to the doctrine of the Remonstrants makes him no Saint for the time here must certainly be repeated a new famous act of Justification according to their doctrine as famous as the first was as well as a new act of conversion Luke 22.32 But I need not go to this Supposition of a Saints falling away for I can shew that this is no absonous or unheard of thing in the Scripture that Justification may be repeated even upon a Saint of God that keeps his standing See that Scripture in James 2.21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he had offered up Isaac his son upon the Altar ver 22. And the Scripture was then fulfilled which saith Abraham believed God and it was imputed unto him for righteousness Now when was this Justification of Abraham which is here mentioned Why it was at least thirteen years after Abrahams first famous Justification for that was upon his believing that God would give him a Son this was upon his offering up the Son after he was given when he was grown up to be a stout Lad and could carry the wood for his father up the hill That first act of Justification passed upon him when Abraham himself was in uncircumoision this after he and all his family were circumcised therefore the act of Justification may be repeated over several times upon the same person And for a little countenance for this from the authority of Authors Mr Baxter in his Aphorismes makes mention of a threefold Justification inchoate continued and sinall Thesis 59. pag. 233. Justification is not a momentaneous act begun
that even in the dayes of the Gospel other acts of faith justifie besides that by which we have immediate respect to the blood of Christ I shall prove this second Assertion by Argument and Scripture 1. By Argument Certainly in the times of the Old Testament though I verily believe that saith in the death and blood of Christ was not necessary to Justification yet they had something in their faith that did answer our faith in the blood of Christ as perhaps a respect to the mercies of God and Gods readiness to be appeased which readiness in God was manifested by the Sacrifices which he had appointed Now I will argue by analogie If the Jewes had some such like object for their faith as the blood of Christ is to us and yet were not justified only by their fixing upon that object but for other acts of faith as is evident in the instances given then nothing hinders but we may be justified by other acts of our faith as well as that in the blood of Christ I will give another argument to prove my Assertion somewhat like this We are commanded in the Gospel John 5.23 That all men should honour the Son as they honour the Father and wherein did Abraham glorifie God so much as by his strong faith Rom. 4.20 If therefore our duty be to honour Christ by believing as ever any of the ancient Saints honoured God the Father why will not the same faith in the power of Christ justifie as did when it was placed in the power of God which yet I have proved that it did justifie Now for Scriptures c. I shall give several instances of faith in the power of Christ or at least in some attribute and excellency of Christ besides his blood which justified Luke 5.18 19 20. There was a great faith of the paralytick man and his friends that if he could but come to Christ he should be healed and therefore they opened the roof of the house and let him down through the tiling in his Couch and when Jesus saw cheir faith that is of the sick man and those that brought him he said unto him Man thy sins are forgiven thee Here is forgiveness of sins which is Justification upon a faith only to be healed whether it were in the goodness or power of Christ it was not faith in his blood for this man was as ignorant of that mystery sure as the Disciples of Christ were who yet understood little or nothing of it Luke 18.33 34. I shall give but two instances more of this and they are expresly of faith in the power of Christ as doubtless the former instance had much of this faith in it it is in Math. 9.28 29 30. There are two blinde men healed and restored to their sight and that purely upon their faith which great mercy coming in upon their faith was certainly a great token of divine approbation though indeed it be not then said that their sins were forgiven them Now what is the proper object of their faith at this time It is the power of Christ to help them Jesus saith unto them Believe yee that I am able to do this They said unto him Yea Lord then touched he their eyes saying According to your faith so be it unto you and their eyes were opened The last instance is of the Centurion's faith which I must needs say I think as pertinent an instance as either of the two former for his faith is highly approved of Christ I have not found so great faith no not in Israel as in this stranger to Israel and upon it speaks of him and others that are none of the children of the Kingdome that is not natural Jewes that yet shall go to heaven before these that are therefore I doubt not but this was a justifying faith in the Centurion Now let us see the compass of this Faith or wherein it chiefly manifested it self Why it was onely in this that Christ was able to cure his servant of the Palsie nay he thought that diseases were as much under the power of Christ to cure as the Centurions servants were under him to command he could make Diseases come and go as his servants would at his command Mat. 8 from the 5. to the 14. Having given instances of Faith in Christ which justifies besides Faith in his blood I shall give one general proof from a most remarkable Scripture out of the New-Testament for faith as justifying which onely carries in it a dependance upon God and Christ in straits and persecutions and distresses And indeed I must confess the former instances are not of so full proof to my particular though they are of good use because til Christ's death faith in his blood was not so necessary if at all necessary to Justification as afterwards but this place which I shall now give wil be beyond all exception it is Heb. 10.36 37 38. For ye have need of patience for yet a little while and he that shall come will come and will not tarry Now the just shall live by faith and if any man draw back my soul shall have no pleasure in him The Hebrews here were under great persecutions for the profession of the Gospel and they were somewhat inclined to Apostacy which here the Author of this Epistle endeavours to prevent by promises and threatnings 't is but a little while and he that shall come will come and will not tarry 't is not long saith he ere deliverance wil come one way or other either by the coming of Christ to judgement or some temporal deliverance In Habbakkuk it is The Vision is yet for an appointed time though it tarry wait for it And in the mean time saith the Author of this Epistle while the Vision tarries whilst he that is coming tarries wait his coming and endeavour to support your selves by faith for the just shall live by faith that is Faith wil keep him alive in straits The life that I live in the stesh saith Paul I live by the faith of the Son of God And saith Habakkuk Although the Fig-Tree should not blossome neither shall fruit be in the Vine c. when he describes a Famine yet I will rejoice in the Lord I will joy in the God of my salvation Hab. 3.17 18. This could be done onely by such a Faith as the Hebrews are provoked to live by This faith you see therefore by which the just live may be as wel a dependance upon the goodness and providence and power of God to support us in or deliver us out of straits and difficulties as resting upon the blood of Christ and that this living by Faith upon the Power of God and goodness of God here spoken of is an act of justifying-Faith nothing is plainer for that this is the great sentence the Apostle quotes to prove Justification by Faith out of the Old-Testament Rom 1.17 Gal. 3.11 when yet the occasion upon which it is delivered by Habbakkuk ch
these words I finde it only this That the sins that are past should be meant of the sins of a man's life past before he comes to believe which is a good honest sense for it is very true That when a man comes to believe in Christ and in his blood all the sins of his past life shall be forgiven him but that this is not meant by the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sins that are past seems clear to me from that term of opposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 at this time which is certainly meant of the times of the Gospel in opposition to a former time in which those sins past were committed and therefore that former time was the time before the Gospel-dayes which observation is strengthened by that parallel place in the Acts where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is opposed in the very same case to the times of Ignorance and Forbearance which God winked at I have now finished my proof of the second Assertion and so I have done with what I thought necessary to adde by way of Appendix to the former treatise the designe of which was to shew how the great business of Justification came to be transferred from Works to Grace from the Law to Faith in which I must needs say I reckon is contained the most considerable piece of Gospel-mystery in the whole Book of God The Lord give Me thee Reader a spirit of Illumination rightly to understand it and rellish it I come now to the Uses of the whole Discourse fore-going and here I need not be so large as otherwise I might be having inserted applications in several places of the body of the Discourse for that the very Discourse it self is altogether practical but most especially for that the chief end of the Discourse was the discovery of Legality and this I have so done my endeavour unto in the characters and their applications that I shall have nothing at all of that to do in the Uses Yet something I shall adde by way of application And first of all Is it so as I have above evinced that the Law was our natural way of Justification which we were born under 1 Use of Inso mation that we had all made our selves obnoxious to the wrath and curse of it that that had seised of us as Prisoners and Mâ—lefactors and that yet notvvithstanding all this we are all of us now either under the tender of Grace or in the state of Grace Favour vvith God all this in a comly and honourable vvay for the Lavv. Then this gives us matter of Information of or rather Admiration at the several Attributes of Goodness Wisedom and Holiness in God I shall be as brief as I may be in this Use because these things are obvious But here is certainly eminent goodness and grace to mankinde shevvn in this vvonderfull change of Justification from Works to Faith 1 Of the grace and goodness of God in this Gospel-way What that vvhen vve had undone our selves as to the Law had not only weakened our ovvn strengths when we were weak Christ died for the ungodly but weakened the Law it self for the Law was made weak through our Flesh so as it could not justifie us that then the Lord should not only seek out a vvay to support us from falling and sinking but set us into a better a more easie and more glorious vvay of salvation than we vvere in before this is a wonder of Grace and Mercy 1. For the glory of this way When an earthly Adam had betrayed all his trust for his posterity and undone us that then vve should have a second Adam who is the Lord from heaven and vvho is infinitely to be preferred before the first vve have a glorious representation of him in his similitude unto and dissimilitude from the first Adam in Rom. 5. from the 14. ver to the end 2. For the easiness of this way That vvhen we had made not found the Lavv not only difficult but impossible to be kept by us so that the going about to fulfill that novv would be like climbing up to heaven descending dovvn to hell and getting up again nay raising a Saviour thence or like compassing the vvhole world that instead of this novv vve should have a vvay set before us so plain That wayfaring men though fooles shall not erre therein Esay 38.5 so near us that vve need not go out of our selves for it if I may so express it the word is nigh thee even in thine heart and in thy mouth that thou mayest do it even the word of Faith Rom. 10.8 so easie that vve may run in it I will run the way of thy Commandements Psal 119.32 His Commandements are not grievous 1 John 5.3 My yoke is easie and my bur-then is light Math. 11.29 30. This way of salvation is so easie to every honest soul that it is but Ask and have seek and finde knock and it shall be opened Math. 7.7 And Rom. 10.13 Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved though this easiness be not found by wicked men Knowledge is easie TO HIM THAT UNDERST ANDETH and to him only Prov. 14.6 Neither is it easie to us without the assistances of the Spirit but these assistances are at hand to good men and therefore the way of Gospel-Justification and Salvation is wonderfull easie and delightsom and this is a very great argument of the goodness of God If God had proposed the highest difficulties imaginable and made it our duty to overcome them if we would obtain the Crown of Glory proposed to us we should have had no reason to complain but when he hath taken us off from a difficult nay an impossible way though once the true way that we were upon and set us upon an easier way that that is pleasant and delightsom and still proposeth the same or a greater reward this is grace and mercy indeed here are riches of Mercies Mic. 6.8 He hath shewed thee O man what is good and what doth the Lord REQUIRE of thee but to do justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with thy God What canst thou do less What wouldst thou do else Thy very work is reward enough and yet thou shalt have a reward infinitely more glorious than thy work deserves Besides in this way the holiness of God 2 Of the Holiness of God that is his hatred of and displeasure against sin is made very illustrious in that his Law must be taken off honourably before the way of Grace must enter I am sure this is so for us under the Gospel and if under the Old Testament men were saved another way I should think it very strange but of this above Lastly 3 Of the Wisedom of God not to mention the power of God discovered in this way in the Miracles of Christ his Apostles raising Christ from the dead c. The Wisedom of God is exceedingly manifested
the Law is manifested even the righteousness which is of God by Faith 24. Being justified freely by his Grace 28. Therefore we conclude That a man is justified by Faith without the deeds of the Law The 7th and last Proposition is this That de facto there hath been no other way of Justification which hath taken effect upon any sinful man nor any other way adhered to by any of the true Saints of God since the fall of Adam but this way of Faith And the Apostle takes this way of proof viz from the event For most people are more affected with Events then with Arguments from the nature and profound reason of the thing Therefore having proved it first from the nature of the law I come to examples and they shall be but two one plain the other mystical and lastly prove it from a Testimony out of David to this way of Justification by Faith herein following the Apostle in the way which he takes or rather herein onely marking out the way which he takes not imitating it in doing the like The first and onely-plain example which the Apostle proves Justification by Faith by is that of Abraham this example of Abraham the Apostle hath continual recourse to in his Discourses of this subject both in the Romans and Galatians and well might having to deal with the Jews and Jewdâ—izing Gentiles who gloryed in nothing more then to be called and accounted Abraham's Seed and the Apostle in his urging this Example plainly proceeds upon such a supposition as this Certainly your Father Abraham was justified in the right way and you will desire to be justified in no other way then he was Now He prove to you clearly that he was not justified by the law nor by vvorks but by Faith by the promise therefore justification is not by the lavv nor by vvorks but by Faith Thus the Apostle argues Rom. 4. Gal. 3. Rom. 4.1 What shall we say then that Abraham our Father as pertaining to the flesh hath found That is either Abraham our fleshly Father hath found or Abraham our Father hath found according to the flesh that is in the vvay of a fleshly righteousness VVhat hath he found Hath he found Justification by the flesh Shall vve say he hath It follovvs ver 2. For if Abrahaw were justified by works he hath whereof to glory but not before God that is but he hath not vvhereof to glory before God therefore he vvas not justified by vvorks For if he vvere justified by vvorks he might glory before God for the lavv of vvorks if a man hath these vvorks doth not exclude glorying before God But novv Abraham hath not vvhereof to glory before God therefore he vvas not justified by works v. 3. For what saith the Scripture Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for righteousness v. 4 5. Now he that believeth as the Scriture saith Abraham did he worketh not that is seeks not Justification by works Novv see Gal. 3. vvhere the same example is brought in proof by the Apostle v. 6. Abraham believed God and it was accounted to him for righteousness v. 7. Knovv therefore that they which are of Faith and for the way of believing the same are the true Children of Abraham and the onely blessed or justified persons v. 18. For if the Inheritance be of the Law it is no more of the Promise but God gave it to Abraham by Promise therefore he had not the Inheritance by the Law nor the Works of it therefore we must not expect it that way for we must bejustified the same way that Abraham was Having given you the plain example I shal likewise give you the Mystical or Allegorical example which the Apostle produceth to prove this last assertion that de facto Faith hath been all along the way of Justification and it is safe using Allegories when the truth is once well established and I have heard it observed that the Jews were much taken with this way of Allegories The Allegorical example therefore is that of Hagar and Saraah The Allegory of Hagar and Sarah Isaac and Ishmael in Gal. 4. from the 21. ver to the end The substance of it is this Hagar was Mount Sinai in Arabia and that Mountain vvhich the Jews call Sinai the Arabians call Hagar Novv upon Mount Sinai or Mount Hagar vvas the Lavv delivered as much as to say Allegorically Hagar and her Seed are for Mount Sinai for the Lavv and the Works of it for justification But novv Sarah ansvvers Jerusalem that is above and to Mount Sion that is she vvas a Type of the Gospel-Church vvhich is for Justification by Faith Novv vvhat saith the Scripture v 30. concerning these tvvo Mothers and their Children vvhich was not onely true literally but is to be understood mystically and figuratively of the two Seeds of those two sorts of men that adhere the one to the Law for justification the other to the way of believing what saith the Scripture Cast out the Bond-woman and her son for the son of the Bond-woman shall not be heir with the Son of the Free-woman as much as to say Those that go to Mount Sinai to the Law for Justification shall never be heirs of God but only the Gospel-Churcch those that adhere to the way of Justification by Faith according to that Scripture Gal. 3.18 If the Inheritance be of the Law it is no more of the Promise but God gave it to Abraham and Sarah and her Seed by promise Abraham is the Father of us all Rom. 4.16 and Saraah vvhich ansvvers to Jerusalem that is above is the Mother of us all Gal. 4.26 Novv if any should object that this prove de facto onely since Abrahams time for all that vvould be accounted of his Seed I ansvver Let them look into Heb. 11. and there they may see a Catalogue of Saints from Abels time dovvn to the time of the Maccabees and in the end of that chap it is said These all obtained a good report through faith ver 39. I come novv to my last proof vvhich vvas to be from Testimony out of David vvhich the Apostle likevvise makes use of for an Argument Rom 4.6 7. vvherein the Apostle tells us there is a description of the blessedness of Justification and particularly that Justification vvhich is by Faith and give me a Scriprure-description this is Authentick and Divine Ver. 6. Even as David alsâ— describeth the blessedness of the man unto whom Goâ— imputeth righteousness without works This is purely a description of Justification by Faith Now what is it It follows v. 7 8. saying Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven and whose sins are covered blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin Here David makes him the onely blessed man that is justified by Faith and what is this Justification other then pardon of sin forgiveness of Iniquity Mercy Grace a thing that the Law is not acquainted with the Law cannot
believe whereas some think it as hard a business to believe as to keep the whole Law 2. They 'l say That I make the Gospel but a Covenant of works in a new dress and substitute Evangelical obedience in the room of Legal as the matter of our Justification 3. They may perhaps add that I leave out the great Gospel-mysterie which according to the Apostle is contained in Deut. and that is Christ That which Moses expresseth thus the Commandment which I command thee is not in heaven that thou shouldst say Who shall ascend for us into Heaven bring it unto us that we may hear it and do it The Apostle Paul expresseth thus Who shall ascend for us into Heaven that is to bring Christ down from above or who shall descend into the deep that is to bring up Christ again from the dead But what saith it The Word is nigh thee even in thy mouth and in thy heart and leaving out that thou mayest do it he addeth the Word of Faith which we preach that if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus and shall believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead thou shalt be saved Here we see the Apostle sinds Christ in all that speech of Moses and it was Faith on him that justified therefore it was not a keeping of the Law according to sincerity instead of unerring obedience which Moses meant and so the exposition given of Moses is useless Now I shall answer first this last objection against the interpretation of Moses his Covenant of Grace and then come to the other two objections and I shall do it in the words of truth as I hope I am sure in the words soberness The last objection first answered 1. I do believe all this which the Apostle adds by way of Paraphrase to agree wel with the words of Moses 2. That yet I cannot believe that any ordinary Saint or any other then some mightily inspired by God like an Apostle could have understood all that in Moses his words when they were first delivered viz. That Christ should descend into the deep and after that be raised from the dead and ascend into Heaven because Moses sayes Say not in thine heart Who shall ascend for us into Heaven and bring the Word from thence that we may hear it and do it Or because Moses sayes Who shall go for us beyond the Seas and bring the Word unto us Neither can I believe that it was their duty in Moses's time to confess with their mouth the Lord Jesus or to believe in their heart that God had raised him from the dead a thing which was not at that time true I say I do not think it was their duty to believe it because to us it is contained in the Word of Faith to wit the Gospel which the Apostle preached Neither do I believe that it was a necessary duty of that time so much as to believe that God would raise Christ from the dead and that for this reason For all the Apostles in the dayes of Christ's Flesh were ignorant of this Mystery yea did not believe it or understand it after Christ had told them of it as is very plein in Luke 18. from 31. to 35. The reciting the words of that Text is plain proof enough without urging them by force of Argument 31. Then he took unto him the twelve and said unto them Behold we go up to Jerusalem and all things that are written by the Prophets concerning the Son of Man shall be accomplished Ver. 33. They shall scourge him and put him to death and the third day he shall rise again Now it is said ver 34. that they understood none of these things and this saying was hid from them neither knew they the things that were spoken Therefore certainly these things were not necessary to be known and believed in Moses his time And therefore though there be so much Gospel contained in that Text of Deut. to us now that the Apostle hath discovered it unless we will say they are additional glosses upon that Text of Moses which perhaps may prove no false Divinity I say Permit all that be contained to us in that Text of Deut. which St. Paul hath discovered in it yet by them under the Old-Testament as I think there could be no more understood then this That they were not to lay it upon themselves as absolutely necessary to salvation and so unto Justification to keep the whole Law in the strictness of it but that they were to minde the keeping of it from their heart to turn unto the Lord their God with all their heart and with all their souls and so to keepe his Commandments and his Statutes which are written in this Book of the Law as it is ver 10. immediately preceding those Verses in Deut. 30. where the righteousness of Faith is said to be described and this to do to keep the Law with all their heart sincerely they should find easie and pleasant whenas for a strict Covenant of Works Do this and thou shalt live they would find it an unsupportable yoke and burthen Now I come to answer those other two objections against my interpretation The first answered the first is this That I make Faith too easie athing in comparison of keeping the Law whereas many good men judg it a hard to believe as to keep the whole Law I answer 1. That indeed I do think the way of Faith to be an easier way in it self then keeping the whole Law For I ask any sober man Whether it be not easier to keep the Law in a sincere manner that is to guide my actions onely by the rule of it and honestly to endeavour toconform to it though in some things I fail if this be not easier then the exact keeping the Law to a tittle The question I suppose is answered as soon as made Why then I say I look upon the way of believing to be this Corning to God humbling my self for my sins addicting my self to his service and walking faithfully with him The description 〈…〉 and in this way of well doing seeking for glory honour and â—mmortality In one word It is an Honesty to God upon terms of Grace and I being honest and true to him doubt not of his faithfulness to me for pardoning my sins and providing for me here and saving me here after Erge if this be Faith for proof of which I refer to my interpretation and require a better or fairer in confutation of it I say if this be faith then the way of Faith is easier then keeping the whole Law 2. But yet I have not said that though it be easier yet it is in a mans own power to believe it is not iâ— a man 's own power to move a finger without God and it is equally impossible without God to move a singer and to remove a Mountain yet there is no man in his right
they believe it that if they do such and such things which are not made the condition of pardon by God for going such a pilgrimage for taking such a penance c. they shall have their sins pardoned for so long a time And wherein doth Justification consist so much as in pardon of sin Therefore they seek Justification by Works even by inventions of their own which is worse then by Works commanded Now that which is so gross amongst them may be as truly though more refinedly amongst our selves I have now done with the two first particulars in the Conviction I shall onely now recollect what I have said and proved that so I may borrow some strength for what follows and so proceed Is it so then that all mankind is so exceeding apt to seek Justification by Works And is it such an hidden and unsearchable evil of heart that we cannot easily know it it hath so many self-deceits and runs through so many contradictions Doth it lie in opinion of Merit yet is Merit so generally disowned and yet so many real votaries to it What need then have we to search and try if we are not guilty in this particular and how far we may possibly be guilty For though we have found out the very notion in which it must lie viz. The Opinion of Merit yet this will not serve usually to find it out by for who of us doth not renounce Merits and yet who of us if the foregoing assertions be true is not addicted to Legality I shall come therefore to some other ways of discovery of this evil distemper of heart some marks and signs of it some effects which discover their cause though never so occult and hidden before And this is the third particular in the Conviction which I promised The first was to discover that there are such men as seek Justification by Works The second was to discover wherein their Legality lies And this third to discover by some signs where this Legality is to be found either in a predominancy or in any less degree Now for the discharge of this last part of my Work in the Conviction The third thing in the Conviction viz. the Characters I shall first premise two things and then come to the Characters The first is this That all men in the world are either prophane and Atheistical or else in some way or other Religious as for those that are prophane and atheistical I have nothing to do with them in this Discourse for that they have nothing to do with Justification who make no pursuit after it at all The second observation that I would premise is this That as for the Religious World those that treat with God after any sort for their salvation they are all reducible to one of these two sorts they are either Legal or Evangelical in their service and obedience for there being but two wayes of Justification either in the Scripture or imaginable by us by unerring obedience and meriting or by the way of mercy which accepts an humble sincerity I say there being onely these two ways all that seek Justification must be of one of these two ways and hence I would infer that where-ever we find in Scripture any two ways of serving God that have followers and abettors being two opposite ways whereof one is good and acceptable the other evil and displeasing to God there are these two ways of Legal and Evangelical service and the Characters of the good way may be referred to the head of Evangelical the Characters of the bad unto the head of Legal Worshippers Or if we cannot make a clear reference of every miscarriage in Religion unto legallity yet this I dare affirm and shall prove That the distinction of Legal and Evangelical Worshippers or of such as are fleshly and such as are spiritual in the Worship of God is very ancient nay as ancient as all Antiquity so that throughout all ages in the Scripture and in our own age in undeniable experience there may be traced these two sorts of religious persons and that by Characters that are visibly Legalor Evangelical And whatever be the infinite perty differences of Sects in any age or place yet all men professing Religion may be reduced to these two classes or sorts of Legal and Evangelical Worshippers and these are the great things that are to be minded in them if you find that they are spiritual Worshippers pass by their petty differences if they are fleshly be not deceived by that fair shew which they make in the flesh for the Antiquity and continual suceession of these two sorts of Worshippers and that as they include all sorts of Religious persons see one Scripture then I come to the Characters it is in Gal. 4.29 But as then that is in Abraham's time he of the one side that was born after the flesh the son of the Bond-woman Hagar the Son of a Covenant of Works perseâ—nted him on the other side that was born after the Spirit that is the true Son of the Promise the Evangelical Worshipper so it is now As it was in the beginning so it is and ever wil be to the end of the World two sorts of Worshippers which two sorts all Religious persons may be referred unto If it were proper to enlarge upon this observation I could give more ample proof of it Now for the Characters 1 It is a 〈◊〉 way which â—e joiceth and glorieth in external priviledges and performances The proof that the legal way is an external fleshly way the first shall be this They that are for a Covenant of Works for the Law are much and chiefly for external services this I have partly touched before but I have a very fair occasion to speak to it here again and I dare promise the Reader to free him from the trouble of needless repetition I say those that are under predominant Legality in treating with God for their justification and acceptation they are chiefly for external services in their Worship and expressions of their obedience unto God This the Apostle calls flesh or a fleshly outward way of serving God in Phil. 3.2 3. the Apostle speaks home to this Character I will give you saith the Apostle in the first ver some SAFE advice and counsel what sort and party of men you should avoid and what sort you should close with Ver. 2. Beware of Dogs beware of evil workers beware of that evil sort of Worshippers that are in the sight of God no better then Dogs and not children Now who are they Why the concision 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By the Concision is usually understood the Circumcision or legal Jew that gloryed in his Circumcision here called the Concision by an Ironical Paronomasia alluding to the Factions and Schisms which they made every where Beware of these saith the Apostle and do not receive them nor adher to them for we are the Circumcision that is the true Children of
the holy Spirit is ready to fill ouâ— hearts with laughter and our tongue with singing in Col. 3.16 Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord. in Eph. 5.18 19. Be ye filled with the Spirit speaking 〈◊〉 your selves in Psalms and hymns and spiritual songs singing and making melody in your hearts to the Lord. So we see 't is the great duty of the Gospel for Saints to rejoice in the thoughts of God But there are several ways by which the Saints may and many do deprive themselves of comfort by falling into sins which to be sure will break their peace or else by admitting Satans subtilties against their peace hearkening to all the whispers of the Serpent against themselves who sometimes tells them they are not elected at other times that they have committed the sin against the Holy Ghost another time that they have out-stood the day of grace or that the spirit of God is departed from them and these things I believe many that have the Spirit of God dwelling in them have not out-stood their day of grace much less committed the sin against the holy Ghost may yet call into question and hear Satans suggestions about them so long till they be brought into a perfect maze and labyrinth of thoughts doubts and fears so that except the Lord should bring them our by a Miracle almost I cannot imagine how they should get out This fear and terror therefore was from their own faust at first though now they cannot help themselves 4thly Yet still I think it may be asserted that even for these very persons concerning whom the objection is made and which are mentioned in the last particular that even these when they are themselves and have the right use of their understandings for I reckon that such sad souls pass through many deliriums and irrational imaginations have all of them more kindly strains of ingenuity to God and of filial boldness than any Legallist in the world ever hath they have their lucida intervalla the smiles of God sometimes and feel the supports of the everlasting Arms or if they have not that which you may call comfort yet at least they are enabled to act towards God with a better spirit then that of a slave 5. But for others that are not thus and I hope I may say the greater part of true Saints they have a comfort and joy in the service of God and their hearts are mightily lightened and quickned by it Thy word saith David is sweeter to me then the hâ—ney or the honey-comb Psal 19.10 thy word hath quickned me Psal 119.50 I rejoiced in thy word as one that sindeth great spoil Psal 119.162 their joy bore the Apostles up above all their sufferings 2 Cor. 15. for as the sufferings of Christ abound in us siour consolation also aboundeth by Christ accordingly we are advised by our Saviour that when we suffer for righteousness sake we should rejoice and be exceeding glad or leap for joy as the word signifies Mâ— 5.12 And certainly if the joy of the Gospel be such as will carry us thorough the greatest sufferings it may well carry us thorough all the ordinary affairs and occasions of this life Yet for this see one place in the Book of Ecclesiastes ch 9.7 8. Go thy way eat thy Bread with joy and drink thy wine with a merry heart why so it follows for now God accepteth thy works When a man's ways please the Lord and he hath a sense of it which none but a Gospel-Saint ever hath it will make him go chearfully through all the actions and occasions of his life Now if there be such a general joy upon the true Saints of God arising from their Gospel-way of serving God as will carry them through sufferings and through all the actions of their lives and by consequence into the presence of God with a chearfulness and holy boldness is it not most injurious that the troubles and sadness of a few Saints brought upon themselves against the design of the Gospel through the subtilties of Satan and the Saints own default should be thought able to make this assertion too light viz. that a Gospel-spirit hath an holy boldness and a chearfulness in it and is freed from the Spirit of bondage which accompanies a Legal Spirit into the glorious liberty of son-ship and adoption I shall onely make one observation more before I pass off from the explication and proof of this Character which I think will add some light unto it and it will be of a very contrary nature from the observation which the objection fastens upon and it is this It hath been laid to the charge of the Puritans that they are too familiar with God in their Prayers Now truly I will not undertake to defend those good men that have been honoured with that Name in every thing but I think in this particular as in many other things they have a great excellency in that they know better than their adversaries how to use an holy boldness at the throne of grace And yet to shew that I am not altogether sensless of the danger that there is of erring this way I do here acquaint my Reader that I verily believe that many have grosly erred herein I have heard of one very famous once in London a Tradesman that being gotten in a Pulpit made thus bold with the great God in prayer Thou hast said O Lord that concerning thy sons and concerning thy daughters we should command thee we command thee therefore c I need not go to aggravate this boldness I have heard others my self unreasonably as I thought bold in their expressions in prayer but I dare not charge this upon those good people in the general which have been called Puritans But I am sure however it is with them in one extream it is as bad and worse with the Papists and those that are superstitiously addicted in the other that they dare not use that holy boldness which is allowed them nay which is necessary to be used They think it too great a boldness to go to God in prayer without the mediation and intercession of some Saint or Angel or if they go to the right Mediator they dare not go to him but by the intercession of the Virgin Mary all which are but over-servile fears and denials to themselves of that true liberty and boldness which the Lord admits us unto If they go to celebrate the Eucharist the Supper or Feast of Christ's body blood which we are to eat and to drink at the Lords Table for our souls health first the people must not have the Wine then the Bread must be carryed about and worshipped like a god the Table upon which it is consecrated must be an Altar it must not be received but upon your knees nor taken as the command is Take eat but received from the Priests hand into your mouths which are all
gross conception as this because I have said that the Centurion was justified for his faith in Christ for the healing of his servant and the woman of Canaan for faith for her daughter Abraham for â—ffering his son and so every man for any act of true Faith therefore if a man be to seek for the justification of his person let him find out but any thing in which Faith may act and he shall be justified As for instance I think it the duty of any that are enlightned concerning the corruptions of the Church of Chrise to believe that God wil destroy the Papal Hierarchy and all the superstitious innovations which the Church of Rome hath introduced into the Worship of God yea and I think to believe it strongly at this time when there is so great improbability of it is mighty acceptable to God and perhaps another such act of Faith as Abraham's was that he should have a son and as justifying But now if one that hath lived wickedly but now is greatly convinced of his danger as the Gaoler was should ask what he should do to besaved and justified it were a strange thing to put him upon this act of Faith That God would destroy the Pope of Rome which yet may be an act of justifying-faith to another man We would say to him as Paul and Silas did to the Gaoler when he asked this question They said Believe on the Lord Jesus and thou shalt be saved Acts 16.30 31 Believe that the blood of Christ can wash out as great stains as any of thy sins have made believe that Christ is willing to receive thee cast thy self upon his mercy and goodness Though every act of Faith juscifie yet there is a season for every act of Faith When the Centurion had a servant sick his act of Faith in the power of Christ was seasonable the womans faith for her daughter was seasonable the blind men's was seasonable Abraham's three acts were feasonable Noah's and Rahab's and that of Phineas were all seasonable Faith is a Divine faculty in the soul which hath great variety of operations e'en as many as the sight hath objects which are commended by the several seasons and occasions of acting Faith in famine seeds us in prison it sets us at liberty in weakness of nature it strengthens us yea and in weakness of Grace too Faith sometimes â—ixeth upon the Power of God sometimes upon the Wisdom sometimes upon the Faithfulness of God sometimes upon one attribute sometimes upon another Wee may see in Heb. 11. throughout the whole chap. what variety of glorious operations and effects Faith hath had Through Faith they subdued Kingdoms wrought righteousness obtained promises stopped the mouths of lyons quenched the violence of fire out of weakness were made strong women received their dead raised to life again c. ver 33. to the end All which were justifying acts of Faith onely they were seasonable and prudent he that was cast to the Lyons did not believe to have the sire quenched and they that were cast into the fire did not believe to have the mouths of the Lyons stopped Every act of faith is justifying but then faith is as an universal faculty which acts according to all the particular occasions of the soul and so it justifies I shall now add something of testimony out of Dr. More upon this second question What acts of Faith justifie because I am very sensible that my answer to it may seem very strange and sound very harshly unto some good men and I shall prove out of him so far as his Authority wil prove it That Abraham's act or acts of faith which were justifying to him were acts of faith in the Power Justice and Goodness of God and that they justifie by such their respect had unto these Attributes as also That our Gospel-Faith which indeed hath many new objects and encouragements offered to it doth justifie onely by agreeing with Abraham's faith in the general nature of faith or to use Mr. Goodwins words in the intrinsick nature and complexion of Faith which is ready to lay hold of all occasions of discovering our true and hearty dependance upon God acknowledging our own weakness renouncing all carnal confidence in any thing short of the omnipotent Power and Goodness of God And after these quotations out of him I shal proceed to some other questions In his Mysterie of Godliness p. 379. Faith saith he which is so highly commended by the Apostle I say it signifies nothing else but this in general viz. An high sense of and considence in the Power Justice and Goodnesse of God and a firm belief that he will assuredly bring to pass whatsoever he hath promised seem it never so unlikely and dissicult to flesh and blood And this is that which is so highly commended in Abraham as it is plain in the 4th to the Romans who against hope believed in hope that he might become the father of many Nations and being not weak in faith he considered not his own body now dead when he was about an hundred years old nor yet the deadness of Sardah's womb being fully perswaded that what God had promised he was ABLE to perform and therefore says the Apostle it was imputed to him for righteousness That is to say God approved of him In all this Justification of Abraham there is not a word of the blood of Christ for though I believe it was the blood of Christ that procured Abrahams pardon as a price yet I doubt not but it was Abrahams faith in the power and faithfulness of God that justified him Again pag 380 near the end of it Thus saith he from the example of Abraham would the Apostle commend the CHRISTIAN FAITH unto the World and in particular to the Jews the off-spring of Abraham For at the end of the fourth Chapter he makes this use of Abrahams faith being imputed to him for righteousness that we might also be brought 〈◊〉 TO BELIEVE IN HIM THAT RAISED UP JESUS CHRIST FROM THE DEAD who was delivered for our offences and raised again for our justification As Abrahams faith in the Power of God to give him a son was justifying so is our faith in the Power and Mercy of God as having raised up Jesus Christ from the dead who was delivered for our offences justifying Our faith viz. the Christian faith hath somewhat more in it than was in Abrahams faith yet Abrahams faith proving Justification to him we may well be encouraged to expect Justification in the way of a Gospelsaith And pag. 381. he gives us another instance of a Gospel-faith which he parallels with the faith of Abraham and that is A faith in the power of God to raise up Christ within us by his living Spirit from the 11th ver of Rom. 8. which I think is indeed rightly interpreted though with the favour of that great man not so happily applied but that I shall speak unto viz. wherein I differ from the
Dr. upon the next question The words are these But if the Spirit of him that raised up jesus from the dead dwell in you he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his spirit which dwelleth in you and if Christ be in you the body is dead because of sin but the spirit is life because of righteousness ver 10. His interpretation of the verse is excellent in my mind and it is to this sense as I apprehend it That when we are Christians and have the Spirit of Christ dwelling in us and the presence of Christ by his Spirit we shall be sensible how far yet we remain unsanctified and that unsanctified part in us which the Apostle calls the body of death and desires to be delivered from will appear as ghastly and deadly a thing to us as the dead body tyed by Mezentius to the living did to him because Christ is living in us But yet now our Christian faith teacheth us to believe that though the body be dead because of sin that is there be a great part of us yet unsanctified and dead because of sinful remainders in it and by reason of this unsanctified part or body of death in us we are exceeding heavy and indisposed to all holiness and goodness yet that the Spirit of Christ in us is life and righteousness and will by degrees qvicken those very dead unsanctified parts that are yet within us for if the Spirit of him that raised up Christ from the dead dwell in us he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken our mortal hodies that is that unsanctified part that is at present dead in sin by his Spirit which dwelleth in us Dr. More 's words are We finding a comfortable warmth in the grateful arrivals of the holy Spirit do believe That he that raised up Christ from the dead wil in due time even quicken these our mortal bodies or these dead bodies of ours and make them conspire and come along with ease and chearfulness and be ready and active complying instruments in alll things with the Spirit of Righteousness Which belief viz. that God will thus by his Spirit quicken our mortal bodies is saith he a chief point in the Christian faith and most of all parallel to that of Abrahams who believing in the goodness and power and faithfulness of God had when both himself and his Wife Saraah were dry and dead as to natural generation and so hopeless of ever seeing any fruiâ— of her Womb who had I say Isaac born to him who bears joy and laughter in the very Name oâ— him and was undoubtedly a type of Christ according to the spirit For Isaac is the wisedom power and righteousness of God flowing our and effectually branching it self so through all the faculties both of man's soul and body that the whole man is carryed away with joy and triumph to the acting all whatsoever is really and substantially good even with as much satisfaction and pleasure as he eats when he is hungry and drinks when he is dry And these now according to the designe of the Dis Discourse are acts of a Gospel-faith which justifie us as Abraham's believing in the power of God for a Son did justifie him I come now to another Question which is this How doth Faith justifie The fifth question of Iustification or under what notion and consideration doth faith justifie Now to this I answer that Faith justifies as our Righteousness It doth not justifie as some affirm only by relying upon the blood of Christ or apprehending the righteousness of Christ for I have given instances of several acts of faith which were justifying acts that had not this respect at all unto the blood of Christ at least not visibly and the reward of Justification was reckoned to them upon other accounts Abraham was fully perswaded that God was ABLE TO PERFORM and THEREFORE it was imputed to him for righteousness Rom. 4.21 22. Yea I have given instances of a faith in Christ that was justifying and yet was not directed to the blood of Christ by any thing that appears in the Scriptures quoted No faith it self is our righteousness faith in the power of God was Abraham's righteousness and faith in the power of God according as our necessities at any time require will be our righteousness But more especially faith in the power of Christ or in the blood of Christ is our Gospel-righteousness though as I affirmed before there cannot be true faith in God now in the dayes of the Gospel but it will turn into a faith in Christ as well as in God And for this Assertion that Faith is our Righteousness I shal give several Scriptures Rom. 4.3 What saith the Scripture Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for righteousness that is his believing in God and relying upon his power and faithfulness for the fulfilling of his promise this faith of his was accepted so farr was so highly pleasing to God that God made him his friend Jam. 2.22 23. and reputed and reckoned him through grace as righteous as if he had kept the whole Law So Rom. 4. ver 5. To him that believeth in God that justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted to him for righteousness What plainer expression can there be than this for our Assertion his faith is counted for righteousness to him or for his righteousness And for a little proof from the testimony of others for this Assertion I reckon is somwhat harsh see what Mr Baxter and Mr John Goodwin say upon it In his Aphorisms of Justification Thesis 20. pag. 108. saith Mr Baxter Our Evangelical righteousness is not without us in Christ as our Legal righteousness is but consisteth in our own actions of Faich and Gospel-obedience Thesis 23. pag. 125. In this sense also it is so farr from being an errour to affirm that faith it self is our righteousness that it is a truth necessary for every Christian to know that is Faith is out Evangelical righteousness in the sense before explained as Christ is our Legal righteousness And in the explication of this Thesis pag. 128. he hath these words Our Evangelical righteousness or Faith is imputed to us for as real righteousness as perfect obedience not that it is as much in true value yet it is so accepted because of the value of Christ's satisfaction Thesis 57. pag. 225. It is the act of faith which justifies men at age and not the habit yet not as it is a good work or as it hath in it self any excellency above other graces But 1. in the nearest sense directly and properly as it is the fulfilling the condition of the new Covenant in the remote and more improper sense as it is the receiving of Christ and his satisfactory righteousness Mr John Goodwin likewise declares himself not to be of their minde who conceive or teach That faith justifies as it is an instrument receiving
Christ's righteousness pag. 38. ult Banner of Justification therefore it must justifie as an act which by God's ordination investeth us in the priviledges of Justification therefore in his judgment faith it self is our righteousness But I shall adde no more in answer to those men that hold That Faith justifies only as it applyes the righteousness or blood of Christ unto the soul for I have shewn at large above That faith justifies in other acts of it besides resting upon the blood of Christ I shall have only here to do with Dr More his Notion and it is Mr Smith's too of the righteousness of Faith or Faith its being reckoned or imputed for righteousness and indeed I am very sorry that I should have a word to say against the opinion of so worthy a man and one that labour so vigorously and successfully against all that effeminacy of notion in Religion which is found amongst the Antinomians or others Neither yet do I much differ from him in designe only I cannot be faithfull to my present subject if I should not take notice of his unhappy mis-interpreting those phrases of the Righteousness of faith Justification and Faith's being impuâ—â—td for Righteousness I shall first give an account of the Doctor 's opinion and expressions in this business and then shew the reasons of my dissent from him herein In the 380 pag. of that book which I have so often quoted to borrow some authority and assistance from in this Discourse I mean his Mystery of Godliness at the end of that page the Doctor commenting upon Rom. 4.24 25. To believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead who was delivered for our offences and raised again for our justification hath these words In this verse are contained the two grand Priviledges of the Gospel that is Forgiveness of sins upon the satisfaction of Christ's death and the Justifying of us that is THE MAKING OF US JUST AND HOLY THROUGH A SOUND FAITH IN HIM THAT RAISED JESUS FROM THE DEAD I need quote no more to shew the Doctor 's notion and apprehension of the whole business but yet I shall ex abundanti quote some other passages The Doctor you see is of opinion That Justification signifies making us just holy and righteous and when we are made so then God looks upon us as so because he judgeth of things aright and because Faith makes us truly holy inwardly just and righteous therefore this righteousness by which we are thus inherently righteous is called The Righceousness of Faith For this see page 379. about the middle of it Abraham being not weak in faith considered not his own body now dead being fully perswaded that what God had promised him he was able also to perform and therefore saith the Apostle it was imputed to him for righteousness that is to say God approved of him FOR A GOOD AND PIOUS MAN who not confulting with the natural improbability of the thing but giving firm credence to the promise of God did that which was due to the goodness and power of God and BECOMEING A GOOD AND RIGHTEOUS MAN So that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is NOTHING ELSE but to be approved as a good man or a doer of that which is righteous and good and that because he does that which is good and righteous And afterwards in the same page 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies any virtue or goodness in a man whatsoever with much more to the same purpose And at last adds in page 372. Sect. 9. This is the only warrantable notion that I can finde of being justisied by faith So Mr Smith of Cambridge as I shew above page 220. saith that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Righteousness of Faith and the Righteousness of God is only a Christ-like nature in man's soul c. Having given an account of the Doctor 's judgment I shall now shew in how many things I agree with the Doctor as to this business and then where I conceive there needs some rectification of the Doctor 's notion And first of all I confess these are two GRAND PRIVILEDGES of the Gospel as the Doctor sayes viz. The forgiveness of sins and The sanctification of our natures which latter the Doctor as I doubt not mistakes to be meant by the word Justification in Rom. 4.25 2. I acknowledge that true Sanctification is produced only by faith purifying their hearts by faith Acts 15 9. no other principle will work holiness in the soul The Law made nothing perfect as to inward holiness 3. I grant that if true Sanctification should be wanting from Faith that Faith would not be a righteousness would not justifie Faith without works is dead 4. I allow that Works have some share perhaps a second place in the matter of Justification continued so saith Mr Baxter often and I think so saith St James Jam. 2.24 Yee see then how that by works a man is justified and not by faith only 5. I allow that Justification is attributed several times in Scripture to a Work the Faith not mentioned though the Faith is understood nay the chief honor belongs to faith and the crown is to be set upon Faith's head if we wili make a strict and right interpretation of that Scripture whatever it be Thus the act of Phineas in killing Zimri and Cosbi is reckoned for righteousness and yet no mention of his faith Psal 6.30 31. Then stood up Phineas and EXECUTED JUDGMENT and so the plague was stayed and IHAT was counted unto him for righteousness unto all generations for evermore So very many of the actions in Hebr. 11. which are there by the author of that Epistle reckoned to be the actions of Faith and in several places of that Chapter said to be imputed for righteousness verses 4 5 7. yet in the original places where their stories are recorded not a word mentioned of their faith Compare Abel's history Gen. 4.4 with Heb. 11.4 compare Enoch's Gen. 5.24 with Heb. 11.5 Noah's Gen. 6.13 22. with Heb. 11.7 c. There is not a word mentioned of their faith in Genesis but only of their works and yet their faith in those works is plainly said by the Author of this Epistle to the Hebrews to be a justifying faith Justification is indeed attributed to works the faith not mentioned And so sometimes pardon of sins and eternal life are promised to other graces besides faith Acts 3.19 Math. 5. from ver 3. to ver 11. for these two reasons 1. For that they have a share or a second place in the matter of Justification but 2. and especially For that they necessarily suppose faith as being the fruits and issues of a true and lively faith Yea. 6. I will allow that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Righteousness in the New Testament yea and in St Pauls Epistles signifies Holiness Rom. 6.13 18 20. and that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies to be just Rev. 22.11 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
He that is righteous let him be righteous still which two places the Doctor makes use of for proof But that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 should have these significations where the Apostle is strictly speaking to the business of Justification I can by no means allow yea I think it most abhorrent from the Apostles designe in this business what saith the Apostle Rom. 3.11 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there is none righteous no not one here the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith Rom. 1.17 There is no other righteousness takes place here And to rip up the whole business again which here I am put upon by the Doctor 's assertion and interpretations though otherwise I might have gone on smoothly in my way First of all surely the Doctor will not deny that Justification and Sanctification have different proper conceptions and notions which they are to be understood by that Justification is God's pardoning our sins and receiving our persons into special love and favour that Sanctification is a mans likeness to God in his heart and life or if the Doctor should deny this there are several places will evidence it I shall name but two Acts 13.38 39. Be it know unto you therefore Men and Brethren that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins and by him all that BELIEVE are justified FROM ALL THINGS from which yee could not be justified by the Law of Moses That is saith Dr Hammond shall certainly be freed and purged from the wrath of God and the punishments attending sin in another world from which the Law of Moses could not by all its Ceremonies Washings and Sacrifices purge or cleanse us The other Scripture shall be that in Janes 12.24 Yee see then how that by works a man is justified and not by faith onely Take Justification here for sanctification and let any one see if he can make sence of it nay it is plain in that Chapter that Justification is taken for being highly approved of God and being made the friend of God ver 25. And the Scripture was fulfilled which saith Abraham believed God and it was imputed unto him for righteousness and then as it were exegetical of that expression it is added he was called the friend of God But I know the Dr will allow of the particular without this proof That Justification and Sanctification have these different and proper conceptions mentioned 2dly Certainly the Dr. will allow that the Apostle Paul hath a mighty vigorous and curious Discourse concerning Justification in its proper notion or its foreusal acception as the Dr himself expresseth it pag. 379. ad finem The Apostle forms a professed Discourse nay a Dispute with the Jew and Judaizing-Gentile upon the business of Justification taken for Divine approbation they thought to obtain the favour of God one way but he shews them another These two particulars I shall take for granted Now I proceed 3dly The Apostle therefore being to remove one way of Justification viz. that of the Legallist and to set up another he makes mention of two Righteousnesses one of the Law the other of Faith That of the Law as I have shewed in the beginning of this Treatise is a perfect conformity to the Law perfect inherent righteousness unerring obedience this saith the Apostle no man hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there is none righteous no not one and the Apostle in that third chap. of the Rom. by enumerating all sorts of sins which we are all more or less guilty of proves that no man can be jusâ—â—ed by the Law this righteousness therefore the Apostle having fully removed as an impossible unattainable thing he as a Messenger from heaven substitutes another righteousness which he calls Gods Righteousness in opposition to our own the righteousness of God is revealed that is that righteousness which God will accept and what is that why it is Faith The righteousness of God is revealed from Faith to Faith as it is written The Just shall 〈◊〉 â—aith Rom. 1.16.17 The scope of the Apostles Discourse I doubt not is this That God hath designed and determined that seeing men have lost their Original purity and to can no longer stand upon their own bottom he will take them off from it altogether and make them live a life of pure dependance upon himself and that is by faith which must have holiness of life attending it and those that come off to do this renounce themselves their own righteousness and all creature-dependencies and roll themselves and all their concerns upon him and upon his Son though their imperfections may be 〈◊〉 yet this their faith shall be imputed to them â—â—r righteousness which they may plead for their â—â—tilication according to the Law of the new Covenant and they shall pass for righteous men as truly iustified and approved as if they had perfectly kept the whole Law under which they were created especially since God had made provision otherways how thâ— honor of that Law might receive râ—â—â—ation viz. by the death of his Son upon the Cross And this I suppose is no santastical notion of Justification by Faith which I suppose the Dr. is chiefly set against and seeing how many wayer men had corrupted the Doctrine of Justification by Faith after he had solidly confuted their opinions betakes himself to that of his own which I dare say had no evil intention though I still affirm that it is most unhappily exprest and I cannot but read it with a great displeasure and indignation For to think that the Apostle should make so much to do to decry the design of a legal Righteousness which in truth was no other in it self but true and real onely it must be perfect holiness however the Legallists all along in their pursuit after the Righteousness of the Law minded nothing less I say for the Apostle to dispute so vigorously against a Righteousness by perfect unerring obedience under the name of one's own righteousness and to set up Faith as Gods righteousness and yet that this righteousness of saith should signifie nothing else but those poor inconsiderable effects of Faith in holiness of life which the greatest part of Christians attain unto onely this seems a mean business for the Apostle to labour about Alas 't is true Faith works holiness and all the great Legallists shall never attain by all their stir and ado to so much true holiness as the meanest believer attains unto but yet this which we attain though by faith is nothing to give name to a righteousness in the sight of God for Justification to be justified by or for our holiness of faith is a low and base expression of Gospel-Justification The righteousness of Faith is an higher thing when a man comes off from himself and from all Creature-dependencies and professeth to live upon the Power and Goodness and Faithfulness of God and the blood spirit of Christ alone such a
unerring obedience faith was but a part of our duty which we owed to God under the first Covenant that is relying upon the power goodness and veracity of God and therefore where-ever faith comes to be our righteousness or our chief righteousness it argues that there is a great deficiency in the creature that is so to be justified and accordingly the Apostle often glances upon this that glorying is in this way excluded not by the law of works but by the law of faith Faith therefore cannot justifie by any natural excellency that it hath in it for though all the men in the world being now sinners and obnoxious to punishment by the law of their creation should resolve of their own accord to believe that there is so much goodness in God that he will not destroy the work of his own hands so depending upon his mercy and therefore they will endeavour to do all those things which they think may be pleasing and acceptable to him why all this faith and confidence attended with the most sincere obedience will not extort a Justification from Almighty God except it be in his good pleasure to justifie such believers and such obedient persons because they were all obnoxious to punishment for the breach of his law Faith therefore cannot justifie but by reason of divine ordination and constitution that hath passed upon it such as this The just shall live by faith and That if thou confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead thou shalt be saved Rom. 10.9 and for this reason I suppose it is so often called Gods righteousness Rom. 10.3 because it was a righteousness not in its own nature as works were but a righteousness purely of divine appointment This is Mr John Goodwin's notion of it Pag. 34. of the Banner of Justification displayed God was pleased to decree or make this for a law which the Apostle calleth the law of faith Rom. 3.27 that faith or believing in him through Christ should interesse men in the benefit or blessing of the death and blood shed of Christ that is in that remission of sins which was purchased by his death And in this consideration faith justifieth viz. by virtue of the Soveraign authority of that most gracious Decree or Law of God wherein he hath said or decreed that it shall intitle men unto or inright them in part and fellowship of that benefit of the death of Christ which consisteth in the forgiveness of sins or which comes much to the same as it is a qualification or condition ordained covenanted or appointed by God to bring upon those in whom it shall be found the great blessing of that pardon of sin which Christ hath obtained for men by his blood This is Mr Baxter's opinion too that is That saith justifies as it is made the chief condition of the N. Covenant Page 225 of his Aphorisms Thesis 57. It is the act of faith which justifieth men at age and not the habit yet NOT AS IT IS A GOOD WORK this is directly against Dr Moor's affirmation who faith that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is nothing else but to be approved as a good man or a doer of that which is righteous and good and that BECAUSE he doth that which is good and righteous methinks here is a Justification for good works purely and if faith comes in here to justifie it doth it only as it is a good work Mr Baxter is of another minde viz. That faith doth not justifie only under that quaâ—enus or reduplication AS a good work Faith saith Mr Baxter in the Thesis quoted doth not justlfie AS it is a good work or as it hath in it self any excellency above other graces But in the NEAREST SENSE DIRECTLY AND PROPERLY as it is the fulfilling the condition of the New Covenant c. But now though I have affirmed that it doth not justifie purely from its own nature Though faith doth not justisie purely from it's own nature yet it hath a great excellency in it self which might somewhat recommend it to this service but chiefly from the ordination of God and that it could not have justified without this ordination yet I shall adde that it had in its own nature a great fitness to be chosen of God for this eminent service to justifie men by It was the fittest medium that we can imagine when the first natural way of works failed to promote the honour of God and the good of the creature in Justification which consideration commends highly the wisdom of God in setting it apart for this use as the chief condition of our Justification To evince the truth of this let us consider a little the natural excellencyes that there are in faith And first of all faith takes in all spiritual objects 1 Excellency of Faith and represents them to the soul so that all other graces are beholden to faith for their objects Heb. 11.1 Faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen hope could not be if faith did not give a real and evident being and subsistence to the things that we hope for as also to all other the invisible and unseen things which a Christian a Saint as such converseth with and lives upon Again ver 6. of that chap. 11. Without faith 't is impossible to please God For he that comes unto God must believe that he is Now it is by faith that we believe and know that God is ver 27. by faith Moses forsook Egypt not fearing the wrath of the King for he endured as seeing him who is invisible by faith Moses saw him that is invisible I will acknowledge that reason may finde out that there is a God but if a mans wayes please God his reason delivers over this observation to his faith which is an higher thing an higher principle in the soul then reason though it never contradicts true reason yet it is somewhat above meer reason * If any one here will say that faith in such a case as the belief that there is a God is much the same with reason or a rational conviction of the truth of such a Proposition I will not much contend only because here the divine Penman sayes it is by saith we believe there is a God and his assertion must have a truth in it we may distinguish Reason Faith thus That Faith is a more particular faculty or habit of divine principles such as respect God and Religion but Reason is a more general faculty conversant about all objects whatsoever and this consideration must come in That meer Reason only makes one a man but Faith makes a man a Saint and therefore this Faith must have a divine afflatus and spirit in it beyond meer reason It is by faith that we believe that God is and that he is a rewarder of all them that diligently seek him And these two
God a Sacrifice for our sins give his life a ransome c. and though the Father loved him all the while as I cannot admit that the Father was really angry with Christ or that he tasted the Fathers wrath for God could never be angry with one that never displeased him yet undertaking such a load as our sins the Father would deal with him much like as with a sinner leave him to men and devils upon the Cross and with-draw the light of his countenance which forced those sad out-cryes upon the Cross Now upon condition of Christ's performing this great service which was as I verily believe the chiefest designe of his coming into the world for this cause came I to this hour John 12.27 though there were divers other great designes of his coming I say upon condition of performing this great service the great God of heaven would reckon that his word of threatning was fulfilled and the holiness of his Law satisfied in this eminent signification of his displeasure against sin shewn upon his own Son whom he would not spare when he had taken our sins upon him and for ever after would grant this new and living way of Justification unto the world THAT WHOSOEVER SHOULD BELIEVE AND OBEY SINCEREEY should be justified and saved and that for all such they should be no longer under the Law for their Justification but under Grace And I can understand no other sense of the Law 's being dead and Grace it's reigning through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ I shall only need to minde one thing before I go off from this particular The subjects of the great Priviledge of freedom from the Law and that is the subjects of this priviledge of freedom from the Law And they are only so many as put themselves upon the way of believing for Justification all others are really under the Law still When we were in the flesh the motions of sins which were by the Law did work in our members c. Rom. 7.5 All that are in the flesh are under the Law still But now saith the Apostle we are delivered from the Law that being dead wherein we were held The Law was alive before to their conscience whilest they were in the flesh and out of Christ but now the Law was become dead to them which plainly argues that the Law is dead or alive to men in the condemning power of it according to the state that a man is in either of sin or holiness So Rom. 6.14 For sin shall not have dominion over you for ye are not under the Law but under Grace plainly implying that if they were under the Law sin would have dominion over them an also that if sin had dominion over them it were a plain signe that they were under the law This being a great truth in this matter That all that are not serving God in the way of faith are under the law for that the law is the natural way which a man is born under and the way of faith and grace a superadded dispensation upon consideration of the death of Christ for all those that should believe and obey sincerely therefore till they get into the way of believing they must be in that state which men are naturally born under that is under the law I shall conclude this particular with a passage about Dr Preston I have heard it affirmed by one that was contemporary with Dr Preston in Cambridge a person of credit and worth that he heard him preach to this purpose That Christ dyed to make this Proposition true that WHOSOEVER BELIEVETH SHALL BE SAVED Now this I suppose is full to the purpose for proof of what I am upon That Christ dyed to buy a people off from the law that they might be justified by faith he dyed to buy those off from the law that should prove believers as for all others he leaves them to the law still For Christ did not dye to get the law annihilated or made utterly void Do we make void the law God forbid saith the Apostle Rom. 3.31 but he laid down his life for HIS SHEEP and to save HIS PEOPLE from their sins he bought them off from the law such as St Paul I through the law am dead to the law but not for wicked men that is such as continue so they shall finde the law alive to them and full charged with wrath against them it being nothing else but the holy will of the great God unto which all his creatures owe an exact conformity Now by what hath been said I suppose is plainly and fully proved that which I made my first assertion viz. That Christ Jesus in his own person here upon earth underlook and answered the law for all believers so that they may be justified for any accusation that the law hath to charge them with and thus they come under grace and into this easier and sweeter way of Justification in a comly manner the law being honourably taken off So that now God may be just that is mercifull saith Dr Hammond upon the place and the justifier of every one that believes in Jesus Rom. 3 24 25 26. He may now justifie the ungodly Rom. 4.5 which by the law if that had not been taken off by Christ he could not I think have done Methinks what I have said should be a clear proof of this assertion seeing I have not only proved that it is so but shewn out of the Scripture the very manner how the law was taken off All that I can apprehend to remain any whit doubtful or questionable is this How doth it appear that what Christ did in suffering under the law being under the curse c. did reach to the times that were before Christ's coming into the world it may be easily conceived how it makes clear way for our Justification by faith who have lived since his death for if he bare our sins the law will not charge them upon us if he dyed for us or in our stead we are not by the law to die if Christ were sacrificed for us as our Passover we need not fear if we have the Gospel-conditions of Covenant-relation to God in Christ but the destroying law will pass over us see how the word Passover comes from passing over Exod. 12.21 23 27. But how doth it appear that this death of Christ had this influence upon the times of the Old Testament to bring in the way of Justification by faith to them for that you have asserted that the way of Justification by faith hath been in all ages both before the law and under the law as well as now in the dayes of the Gospel and that none was ever justified in any other way Now how were they taken off from the law and brought under Justification by faith or how doth it appear that the death of Christ was the foundation of this way of Justification by faith even to them And unto the
the sins of the ages past I think there is this allusion in the words once in the end of the world for that the High-Priest offered but once in the year ver 7 of this chap. ours once in all and their once was in the end of the year nay about the same distance of time from the years end as our Saviour from the worlds end as is to be seen Lev. 16.29 it was in the seventh moneth seven bearing the same proportion to 12 or very near it that 4 doth to 7. taking it for granted that the world should last but about 7000 years therefore I would infer this allusion to be in the words that as theirs want c. Besides there is that in this Scripture which will enforce this Analogy of the end of the year to the fore-past year and the end of the world to the fore-past ages and it is this That if our Saviour through the excellency of his person and offering had not had this high honor from God that his once offering should serve instead of offering a hundred times over which the Priests under the law were fain to do and yet could never hereby purge away sin as to the Conscience I say if this once offering of our Saviour had not bin so highly acceptable to God as it was he must as the High-Priests did offer often have suffered often since the foundation of the world if he would have obtained pardon of sins for those for whom he obtained it he must have come into the World and suffered once a year or once in an age or else at the end of some certain term of years prefixed to him by his Father This is the argumentation of the holy Pen-man of the Epistle to the Heb. ch 9 25. * Dr Hammond in his Par. upon these words For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world hath it thus For then he should from time to time ever since the BEGINNING the world have dyed many times Now upon what ground doth this argumentation proceed other then this That when he suffered and offered himself it was as a propitiation to God for the sins of all the ages since the Foundation of the World For else whence would it follow at all though our Saviour should have been ranked by his Father amongst the common High-Priests his offering of himself no more accepted for pardon than their offering the blood of Buls Goats was I say whence would it follow that he must have offered himself often since the foundation of the World which certainly respects the ages past if he was not at all to make attonement for the sins of those past ages The Author of that Epistle would rather have said if he had not gone upon this supposition that Christ offered for the sins of the ages past before his suffering but had onely thought that he offered for the ages to come after his suffering I say he would rather have expressed himself thus If out High-Priest Jesus Christ had not been accepted for us under the Gospel more highly than the legal High-Priests were for their people under the law he must often offer as they did SINCE his first offering he must come and suffer death once in the year and then be raised to offer himself to God or at least once in an age or some set-period of time and this he must do to the end of the World he would never have expressed himself thus then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world But whereas now the Apostle looâ—ing upon the world as it were at an end or drawing towards its end for suppose the World last 70 oâ— years yet after 4000. years the Skale of Time is turned and Time in its declining he speaks of the world and the continuance of it as you would do of a year and the continuance of it faith he as the High Priest amongst the Jews did enter into the Holy of Holies once in the end of the year for to make an atonement for the sins of the year past so hath our Saviour once in the end of the world appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself Again for I have somewhat yet further which this phrase now once in the end of the world will afford us and that is this That indeed though it be true and I think I have sufficiently proved it above that this death offering of Christ frees US from sin that live after it as well as THOSE that went afore it yet I verily believe that his death hath a more obvious respect to them that lived in the ages before he suffered than to us who came into the world after he suffered though it hath indeed an influence upon us too and the reason is this for that the use of a Sacrifice is to make atonement for sin after it is committed When did you ever read of a Sacrifice for sins slain and offered before the sin was committed The Sacrifices that should be made thus would rather look like a bribing the Deity to get liberty to sin then to make atonement for sin Therefore all the particular Sacrifices that were appointed they were appointed to be used after the legal uncleanness was contracted and accordingly the High Priest that went but once into the Holy of Holyes it was at the end of the year not at the beginning of the year And thus our Saviour being to take away the sins of the world John 1.29 he came once in the end of the world to take away sin so that his appearing thus in the end of the world seems more plainly to respect the ages past than the ages which were to come and I verily believe if Christ had dyed only for the sins of those ages that have been since his death or shall be yet to the end of the world he would have forborn his death till the end of the world or the times that were near it from this very reason of decency That it is not proper to offer Sacrifice for sin till the sin be committed it rather looks like the dispensation to sin than making atonement for sin But now that Christ was to dye for the sins of all the Saints in all ages before him and that he stayed till the fulness of time even till the declining of time towards its end there being so many transgressions already committed that were to be removed out of the way it was no uncomely thing at all that our Saviour should come and die and offer himself to God when he did though the value of the same Sacrifice was to reach all ages after to the world's end and that especially for that there were many other ends of his coming besides the offering himself thus to God he was to take upon him the Mediatorial Kingdome Several other ends of Christs coming besides offering himself a Sacrifice for sin to set up a
spiritual Worship of God by pulling down all the Jewish Ceremonies making Jew and Gentile one and revealing all the mysteries that were concealed in Moses his dispensation nay his very Sacrifice is one of the greatest Mysteries of all by which we are informed of God's performing his threatnings that the threatnings of heaven are not as claps of thunder without a thunder-bolt in them we see God's hatred of sin punishing it so severely in his own Son we see God's love to the world that he would give his Son for the life of it though he gave him up to the death we have in his life a pattern of perfect holiness which is more than all precepts alone and we see in our Saviour an instance of the Resurrection heavenly glory all these things have been of mighty instruction to the Saints of all ages since the death of Christ If this phrase the end of the world should be understood of the end of the Iewish state this will not at all prejudice my ieference from it that Christs death had respect unto the ages before his coming but rather strengthen it will be to all Saints unto the end of the world and therefore I say these other great ends of his coming being considered there is no undecency at all in his coming so early in the end of the world and offering a Sacrifice that should serve for many ages that were then to come It was at the end of the world that he came and therefore might very well serve for those fewer succeeding ages though it had the first respect unto the ages going before In the sixth and last place I shall bring plain Scripture to prove that Christ dyed for the Saints of the ages that were past before his death There are two Scriptures that speak to this purpose the first that I shall name is in that 9th of the Hebrews the chapter out of which I have been arguing ver 15. And for this cause he speaking of Christ is the Mediatour of the New Testament that by means of death for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the First Testament they which are called c. Here it is said that Christ by the means of his death redeemed or expiated the transgressions that were under the First Testament therefore he dyed for the fins of those that lived under the Old Testament But I shall deal so faithfully with my Reader as to acquaint him with another interpretation which is not contemptible that others give of these words and that is this That our Saviour Christ the Mediator of the New Testament or Covenant by his most excellent Offering redeemed and expiated those sins which could not be expiated by any Sacrifices that were appointed under the First Covenant according to that in Acts 13.39 By him speaking of Christ all that believe are justified from all things from which they could not be justified by the Law of Moses There being in Moses no Sacrifices for adulteries thefts murthers c. whereas in the Christian Religion there is pardon for all sorts of sinners by means of the death of Christ if they have but the Gospel-conditions of pardon So that this interpretation makes the place to speak of the kindes of sins and not of the individual or particular sins which were committed under the first Covenant that Christ by the means of his death hath made redemption of those kinde of fins which there was no redemption for under the first Covenant But I have something to ask of those that make this interpretation yet taking it for passable and it is this I would fain know if any of those sins were pardoned under the Old Testament which here are said to be redeemed by Christ for his followers if they say they were not then all that committed any such kinde of sins were damned for ever which was untrue witness David and Manasseh if they were pardoned as they were then either they were expiated by some Sacrifice or they were not if those that own this interpretation say they were not expiated by some Sacrifice and yet pardoned I oppose not to mention that great argument again That they could not be pardoned without expiation in any consistency with the veracity of God in his threatning this seems a strange rarity in the dealings of God with us that under the New Testament no sin is pardoned but what is expiated by the death of Christ and yet under the Old Testament which was certainly a dispensation more severe than ours there the greatest sins should be pardoned without the intervention of any Sacrifice nay what a strange thing was it in their very dispensation that legal uncleannesses such as Leprosie and Issues c. must be purged by sacrifice See Lev. 14 15. chapters yet the greatest sins of all should be pardoned without a sacrifice if therefore those great sins of Murther Adultery Witchcraft Idolatry c. were pardoned by expiation it must be by this death of Christ to ensue in the end of the world for there was no sacrifice so much as appointed for these sins those that were appointed could never reach to the purging and cleansing of the conscience they only purged the flesh from a fleshly uncleanness Heb 9.13 the blood of Christ alone hitherto hath had a virtue in it to cleanse the conscience therefore I conclude that the blood of Christ made expiation even for those individual sins for which there was no expiatory sacrifice appointed under the Old Testament But to let pass that Scripture what will be said to that in Rom. 3.25 26. where we have these words Whom speaking of Christ God hath set forth or fore-ordained as it is in the margin to be a propitiation through faith in his blood to declare his righteousness for the REMISSION OF SINS THAT ARE PAST through the forbearance of God to declare I say AT THIS TIME his righteousness that he might be just and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus Now I suppose there may be this sense contained in these words That God in the dayes of the Gospel hath set forth clearly what that is by which he was alwayes propitiated and atoned for sins even those sins that were fore-past and fore-committed in the dayes of his forbearance and long-suffering that is the darker times of the world which times we have otherwise expressed in Acts 17.30 to be the dayes of ignorance which God winked at they were the dayes of God's forbearance it was and is the blood of Christ by which God alone alwaies was and still is propitiated for sins only then it was not so well known but now God hath declared 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Acts it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that the forepast sins the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as well as these that are committed under the Gospel were all redeemed and expiated by the blood of Christ As for any other sense that is given of
that hath wrought and can work wonderfull things Witness but these three verses quoted Heb. 11.33 34.35 It was faith made the walls of Jericho fall down by faith in prayer Elijah that was otherwise a weak frail man as we are stopped the bottles of heaven for three years and six moneths that it rained not and by faith again he opened these bottles and the heavens gave rain and the earth brought forth her fruit Jam. 5.17 18. Faith enabled the Apostles to do miracles when the Disciples could not cast out a devil of one that was possest our Saviour tells them the reason was from their unâ—elief and that if they had faith but as a grain of mustard seed they should be able to say unto a mountain Be removed hence into yonder place and it shall remove and nothing should be impossible to them Mat. 17.19 20. What then would a strong faith do if a small faith would do so much It was by faith that persons obtained miracles to be done for themselves and others Math. 9.29 30. Then touched he their eyes saying According to your faith â—e it unto you and their eyes were opened and in Math. 15.28 Jesus answered and said unto her the woman of Canaan O woman great is thy faith be it unto thee even as thou wilt a large grant indeed and her daughter its said was made whole from that very hour This is commonly known by this name the Faith of Miracles and is plainly exprest what it is Mark 11.23 For verily I say unto you that whosoever shall say unto this mountain Be thou removed and be thou cast into the sea and shall not doubt in his heart but shall believe that these things which he saith shall come to pass he shall have whatsoever he saith So again 1 Cor. 13.2 If I had all faith so as to remove mountains Now if Faith will remove mountains even all mountains of difficulties and procure any thing from heaven that we need who would not endeavour to be strong in faith to be rich in faith as the several expressions are Rom. 4.20 Jam. 2 5. 2ly Faith will serve all occasions whatsoever 2 Motive and no wonder if it will work all miraculous effects therefore be rich in faith In famine it will feed thee as it did Elijah and the Widdow of Zareptha 1 King 17. and our Saviour in the Wilderness who lived not by bread but by the word of God for 40 dayes together Math. 4.4 In prison it will enlarge thee as it did Peter Acts 12. or at least enlarge thy heart as it did the hearts of Paul and Silas Acts 16.25 If thy children servants friends are sick it will heal them Mat. 15.28 Mat. 8.6 Jam. 5.14 15. There is no case but faith will reach it We may oppose this shield to all the fiery darts of Satan Eph 6.16 ABOVE ALL taking the shield of Faith whereby we shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked This I have spoken largely to above and therefore shall not enlarge here Faith and that alone will free thy minde of all cares and burthens 3 Motive Cast thy burthen upon the Lord and he shall sustain thee Psal 55.22 casting all your care upon him for he careth for you 1 Pet. 5 7. Now this is to be done onely by faith who would not have a minde quiet and free from cares and who can be carefull when he really believes that the only wise and omnipotent Jehovah takes all his cares upon himself This is the victory that overcometh the world even our faith 1 John 5.4 4. This will quicken all thy graces 4 Motive this you may see likewise above upon the last Question There is no thriving Christian but a believing Christian This is the highest way of honouring God that can be taken 5 Motive Abraham was strong in faith and so gave glory to God if thou doest not make it thy chiefest design in the world to honour God thou art no Saint of God now if thou wouldst study all the wayes imaginable to honour God thou canst not do it so effectually as by this one onely way of believing How is God known in the world in any way with such an honourable reflection as by men's trusting in him To trust our own wit and coÌ„ntrivance and endeavours only in what we do is as much as in us lyes to put God out of the world I am sure it is a living without God in the world whereas trusting in him for all is the only advancing the Lord upon his Throne of Sovereignty Goodness This is the only way of pleasing God 6 Motive Without faith it is impossible to please God for he that comes unto God must believe that he is a rewarder of all them that diligently seek him Men cannot more highly displease God than to believe that he is not good yea that he is not good to ALL that diligently seek him let them look to it that confine and set limits to his Goodness yea God is so highly pleased that men should trust in him that he hath made this the principal condition of the pardon of all our sins and receiving us into his special love and favour Abraham was therefore called the FRIEND OF GOD which is the highest honour in the whole world by this Enoch obtained this testimony taat he PLEASED GOD Heb. 11.5 which was an honourable testimony indeed Yea to conclude this Motive and all the Motives in this Use that the Lord might give us a testimony how highly he is pleased that we should trust in him and how fain he would have us rely upon him he hath at this time 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in these blessed dayes of the Gospel set forth Christ a propitiation to shew how ready he is to be reconciled to all the world in a word one of the greatest ends of the oeconomy by Christ seems to be this that in him representing his Father being the express Image of his Pâ—rson yet partaking of Flesh and Blood like us we might have a fit instrument and help or mediate object for our faith to work upon first upon him and by him upon God himself according to that place once already mentioned 1 Pet. 1.21 Who by him that is Christ do believe in God that raised him up from the dead and gave him glory that your faith and hope might be in God I come now to the matter of the Exhortation it self Be exhorted therefore to be strong in faith that is in the acts of assent and the acts of affiance for these as I take it are the two chief proper acts of faith though after I have ended the Exhortation unto these two I shall give one notion of faith more under which we are to be exhorted to exercise faith 1. For Assent so faith is taken Isai 53.1 Who hath believed our report and Mark 1.15 Repent and believe the Gospel that is the doctrine
of the Gospel and to mention but one place more Rom. 14.23 Whatsoever is not of faith is sin This notion of faith viz. dogmatical faith where the word faith signifies an act is the most common notion of faith in the New Testament that is as the former part of the verse he that doubteth is damned if he eat because he eateth not of faith carrieth it whatsoever a man doth without a sound perswasion in his minde that it is lawfull to do it he sinneth in that action This is the first notion therefore of faith namely the assent to any Proposition though more accurately the assent to a testimony but yet you see the Scripture-notion of faith is somewhat larger than that of the Schools namely the perswasion of or assent unto the truth of a Proposition First therefore if thou wilt be rich in faith be thou rich in truth in thy assent unto truths that is truths in Religion for though it be faith to believe there is such a place as Rome or Constantinople yet my designe confines me here to truths in Religion Be thou rich therefore in assent to divine truths and that whether they be clear by the light of nature or revelation for assent to truths that are clear even by the light of Nature is called Faith by the Author of the Epistle to the Hebrews Heb. 11.6 where to believe that God is which certainly is clear by the light of Nature is called Faith as I have shewn above pag. 291. I say be rich in thy assent unto all truths as near as thou canst whether they be clear by the light of Nature or only by Revelation Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisedom Col. 3.16 So Christ shall dwell in your hearts by faith for according to thy light and knowledge and assent unto truths so will be thy heart affections and conversation he that hath a large light may have a large heart whereas those that have but a narrow light and a scanty knowledge can have but a lower and a more limited sphear and compass to act in for God And if it happen as often it doth that they that know little yet do more than many that know a great deal this comes not from any advantage of the honest man's ignorance but from the folly and carelesness of those persons that are knowing and their want of firm assent to the notions of truth which float in their brains I am but a little carefull here of distinguishing betwixt Knowledge Assent being confined with in the narrow limits of an Use Enlarge thy minde with knowledge and thou gettest a larger field of action and service than otherwise thou canst possibly have for thou must first know thy duty before thou canst do it rightly for he that doth the best actions in the world not knowing that they are good pleaseth neither God nor man they are only the actions of the man they are not humane or manly actions as the Schools distinguish Yea though thou dost a good action yet if thou doubtest whether it be good or no thou sinnest in doing this good action because whatsoever is not of faith is sin For this largeness of faith by assent see that last character where I shew how we should endeavour to know much of Christ 2. But then withall take this advice too in thy faith of assent do not only endeavour to get a true light and perswasion of the truth and goodness of things or actions but get it as firmly rooted and as clear as ever thou canst this will be a mighty advantage to thee for if thou hast only a glimmering light a little cloud will soon darken it if thou gettest but a faint perswasion a small objection will quickly turn it into doubting therefore get thy faith firmly built that thou maist be firm and stable in thy faith and perswasion Be not like children tossed to and fro with every winde of doctrine Eph. 4.14 Be not children in understanding in malice be ye children but in understanding be ye men 1 Cor. 14.20 I think we have sufficient experience in these times of of the sore evil of a weak perswasion about matters of Religion by the running up and down of so many from one party to another till at last they have made shipwrack of their faith that is saith doctrinal as well as of their consciences 1 Tim. 1.19 3ly As to this part of faith which lyes in assent as we ought to endeavour that it be large and strong so we must especially be wary that we fail not in our assent and that a firm assent to those truths that are most important Though it were to be wished yet it cannot be expected that all Saints should be so well acquainted with all truths even those of less weight as it may be justly expected their guid◠should be yet all must look to it that they be well establisht in foundation-truths such as the Death of Christ and his Expiation of sins the Resurrection of the body and the last Judgment we must be sure to continue in this faith grounded and settled and not moved away from the hope of the Gospel Col. 1.23 Rooted and built up in him that is Christ and stablished in the faith as we have been taught that is Faith doctrinal especially in that great Foundation of Jesus Christ Col. 2.7 And truly I think there hath been no greater weakening of our faith in foundation-truths than the multiplying of Fundamentals for taking off that weight and stress which we should lay upon those few fundamentals of the Faith of Christ that are really so and laying it upon things non-funnamental must needs make us unsettled from the foundation So much for the first part of Faith which lyes in assent and the directions about it 2ly For that part of Faith which lyes in Affiance I need not quote many Scriptures to evince this notion of Faith I shall give but one or two John 14.1 Let not your heart be troubled yee believe in God believe also in mee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there is a credere Deo which is to believe what the Lord sayes to be truth and a credere in Deum which is a resting and relying upon God committing all my cares and concernments to him He that believeth in the Son hath everlasting life John 3.36 So that phrase of Scripture to cite no more places of faith in the blood of Christ Rom. 3.25 can be understood of no other than some kinde of affiance such as this that for that blood sake the Lord is ready to be propitious to me if I have the Gospel-conditions of Justification and in this sense namely of affiance I have generally taken faith throughout this Treatise and the reason is this For that this is the end of a dogmatical faith or a faith of assent and cannot be conceived without it as that may without this not that I think there can be