Touching Baptisme the Catholikes belieue that Children as being borne in Originall sinne cannot be saued except they be baptized with water according to those words of S. (1) Ioan. 3. Iohn Vnlesse a man be borne againe of water and the spirit he cannot enter into the kingdome of God The (2) Willet in his meditation vpon the 122. Psalme and Caluin and Beza most frequently Protestants belieue that Infants dying vnbaptized may be saued Touching the Sacrament of Pennance or Confession The Catholikes belieue that after a Christian hath committed any one mortal sinne that sinne cannot be forgiuen him but by meanes of cōfessing the said sinne to a Priest of the new Testament and receauing absolution therof from him answereably to that of S. (3) Ca. 20. Iohn whose sinnes you shall forgiue they are forgiuen them and whose sinnes you shall retayne they are retayned The Protestants belieue that neither the confession of sinnes to man nor the absolution of man is necessary for the remitting of sinne vnto them but that it is suficient to confesse them only to God And thus according to this their diuersitie of doctrine either the Protestants for want of this Sacrament graunting it to be necessary after he hath once mortally sinned cannot be saued or the Catholike for practising a false superstitious manner of seeking to haue his sinnes remitted supposing it to be repugnant to the Institution of Christ cannot haue them remitted and consequently cannot be saued Touching the most blessed Eucharist The Catholikes belieue that the verie body and bloud doth lye ineffably and latently vnder the formes of bread and wyne according to that (4) Mat. 26. This is my Body This is my bloud That (5) Ioan. 6. Vnlesse we eate his Body and drinke his bloud we shall not haue life euerlasting Lastly that we are to Adore Christ his Body being accompanied with his Diuinitie in the said Sacrament The Protestants do belieue that his true Body as neuer leauing heauen cannot possibly be truly and really vnder the formes of bread and wyne and consequently they belieue that the eating of his body and drinking of his bloud is not necessary to Saluation finally they hould our Adoratiō of the Sacrament to be open Idolatry and tearme Catholikes Idolaters for the adoring of it And thus the Protestants as not feeding vpon this Celestiall foode shall not haue life euerlasting if the Catholikes doctrine heerin be true or els Catholikes suppose they should erre for teaching and practising Idolatry heerin should incurre damnation Touching the meanes of our Iustification the Catholikes belieue that not only faith but works also do iustify The Protestants reiect all workes from Iustificatiō teaching that only fayth doth iustifie man yea they further proceede affirming that who once hath true faithe is most assured and (a) Caluin in Instit passim Kemnitius in exam Concilij Trident. certaine of his saluation whereas the Catholikes reputing this as meere presumption are willing according to the (b) Phil. 2. Apostle to worke their saluation with feare and trembling To be short the Protestants (*) so Luther in art 10. 11. 12. Caluin in Antidot Concil Trident. sess 6. Melancthon in locis tit de fide do teach that a man by thinking himself to be Iust is by this meanes become Iust wheras the Catholikes doe hould this doctrine not only to be phantasticall but also in (c) Vide Bellarm. l. 3. de Iustificat reason most absurd Touching grace without which man cannot be saued The Catholiks belieue that God out of the abysse and depth of his infinite mercie offereth to euery Christian sufficient grace wherby he may be saued and therfore they doe encourage euery one to endeauour to seeke their saluation The (d) This is taught by Caluin and Beza in whole Treatises and by D. Willet in his Synopsis of anno 1600. p. 589. Protestants teach that God giueth not this sufficiencie of grace to euery one but to certaine men only and that diuers there are who notwithstanding all their endeauour to belieue truly and liue vertuously yet cannot nor shall not be saued Touching the Decalogue or ten Commaundments The Catholikes belieue that except a Christian doe keep them he cannot be saued according to that saying of our Sauiour (d) Mat. 19. If thou wilt enter into life keep the Commaundments The (e) D. Reynolds in his 2. Conclus annexed to his Cōference p. 697. D. Willet in his Synopsis p. 564. Protestants do absolutely teach an impossibility of keeping them And thereupon (f) Serm. de Moyse Luther thus affirmeth The ten Commaundements appertaine not to vs. Lastly Touching the Pope or Bishop of Rome The Catholikes doe belieue that he is vnder Christ the supreme Pastour vpon Earth that who doth not communicate with him in Sacraments and doctrine not yealding him all due obedience in subiecting their iudgments in matters of faith to his iudgment and sententionall definitions set downe in a generall Councell cannot be saued The Protestants doe teach the Bishop of Rome is that Antichrist which is decyphered by the (g) 2. Thes 2. Apocal. 13. 17. Apostle and which is the designed enemy of Christ and that whosoeuer imbraceth his doctrine or enthralleth as they write their assents to his Cathedrall decrees in points of Religion cannot obtayne Saluation Thus far of these points in which I haue made particuler choyce to insist omitting some others of like nature because we see that most or all of them doe immediatly principally as is aboue said touch the meanes of purchasing of grace of remission of our Sinnes and of obtayning our Saluation being maintayned for such by the Catholiks but vtterly denyed and reiected by the Protestants And heere I now vrge two things First if these former doctrines as they are belieued by the Catholikes doe immediatly concerne Saluation become necessary meanes thereof as instituted by Christ then cannot the Protestants as reiecting all such Doctrines and such meanes both in beliefe and practise be saued If by a supposall they be not of that nature but false in themselues and the contrary doctrines of Protestants true then cannot the Catholikes as belieuing false doctrines immediatly touching mans Saluation and accordingly practising them be saued from which forked argument it may demonstratiuely be inferred that it is impossible that both Catholikes and Protestants the one part belieuing the other not belieuing the foresaid doctrines should both be saued Secondly I vrge that a false beliefe not only in these articles but also in all other Controuersies betweene the Catholike and Protestant is playne Heresy And this because this false beliefe is comprehended within the definition of Heresie as being in it selfe an Election and choyce of a new or false doctrine wilfully maintayned against the Church of God and therfore it followeth that eyther the Catholikes or Protestants for their persisting in this false beliefe or Heresie maintayning it
mention at al and yet the different beliefe of them is houlden necessary to SaluatioÌ„ both by Catholike Protestant From all which it shall appeare how farre distant the Catholike and Protestant Religion are from that vnity in doctrine so necessarily required to that fayth wherby a Christian is to be saued I do heere begin with the Apostles Creed first because the articles of the Trinity the Incarnation the Passion are included in the Creed Secondly by reason there are many Adiaphorists in Religion as I may terme them who seeme to deale more largly and liberally heerin seeing they are coÌ„tent to extend the necessary Obiect of Fayth not only to the articles of the Trinity the Incarnation and the Passion but to all points set downe in the Creed who assure themselues that God exacteth at our hands the beliefe of no other articles then are contayned in the Creed Now heere aforehand we are to conceaue that true Fayth resteth in the true sense meaning of the words of the Creed which was intended by the Apostles and not in the words themselues seeing both in the iudgment of all learned Catholikes and Protestants to belieue the words of the Creed in a sense different from the intended sense of the Apostles and consequently in a false sense is no better then not to belieue the Creed at all And the reason herof is because a false construction drawne from the Creed no lesse then from the Scripture is not the word of God but of man and coÌ„sequently the sayd letter of the Creed so interpreted is subiect to the same censure wherunto the word of man is lyable from whence it followeth that whosoeuer belieueth the words of the Creed in another sense then was intended by the holy Ghost and the Apostles doth not belieue the Creed at all but only belieueth the word of man which euer standeth subiect to errour and mistaking So as that sentence of S. Ierome deliuered only of the Scripture may iustly be applyed to the Creed (a) In Epistola ad Paulinum Scripturae non in legendo sed in intelligendo consistunt Scriptures or Creed do not coÌ„sist in the letter but in the sense and true vnderstanding of the letter This then being thus iustly presupposed let vs beginne to examine the articles of the Creed and see how we Catholikes and Protestants do differ in the construction vnderstanding therof And first touching the first article of our Beliefe in God obserue how different it is The Catholikes do belieue that their God no way formally cooperateth or willeth sinne in man that he hath but one simple and expressed will touching Sinne and this in detesting or hating of Sinne that he will not punish vs for not keeping of such precepts the which are not in our power to keepe that he imputeth sinnes to euery man that committeth sinne briefly that he giueth to all sufficient grace to saue their soules and desireth that al men may be saued Wheras the Protestants belieue the meere contrary to all these points for they belieue that God (b) Beza his display of Popish practises p. 102. saith God exciteth the wicked will of one thiefe to kill another see Swinglius tom 1. de Prouiden c. 6. fol. 365. Calu. Instit l. 2. c. 18. sect 1. cooperateth forceth and willeth a man to sinne That he hath a double will and therfore a dissembling will the one expressed in Scripture according to which he forbiddeth man to sinne the other concealed to himselfe by the which he impelleth man to sin that he will (d) D. Reynolds in his 2. Conclusion annexed to his Conference p. 697. punish vs for transgressing the ten Commaundements it not being in our power to keep the sayd Commaundements (e) Luther tom 2. wittenb de capt Babilon fol. 74. D. VVhitaker de Eccl. contra Bellarm controuersia 2. quaest 5. p. 301. that to the faythfull sinning neuer so wickedly no sinne shal be imputed Finally that to (f) Calu. de Inst l. 30. 23. sayth Confilio nutuque c. God doth ordaine by his counsaile that among men some be borne to certaine damnation froÌ„ their mothers wombe See Willets Synopsis p. 554. affirming the same certaine men he giueth not sufficient meanes of Saluation but purposeth and decreeth from all eternity that some men lyuing in the eye of the world in their owne consciences neuer so vertuously shal be damned thrall to sempiternall perdition Thus we see how great a difference there is betweene the Catholikes and the Protestants in beleiuing the first article of the Creed And how necessarily it followeth that eyther the Catholikes or Protestants do stand subiect and obnoxious to that saying of S. Augustin (g) q. 29. sup Iosue Who imagineth God such as God is not he carieth euery where another God a false God in his mind Touching the second article which is And in Iesus Christ his only Sonne We (h) Concil Trid. Catholikes belieue in Christ who is God of God and equall to his Father a Sauiour who suffred death quoad sufficientiam for all mankind and who accomplished the function of his Sauiourship only according to hiâ— humanity a Sauiour who dyed only in body and not in soule finally a Sauiour who from his first conception was endewed with all knowledge wisdome and prouidence and exempt from all ignorance passion and perturbation Wheras diuers cheife Protestants do belieue in Christ as their Sauiour who according to their faith is God of (i) D. Whitaker approueth this opinion alleadging Caluin in prooffe therof Contra CaÌ„pianum p. 121. himselfe and (k) Melancton in loc comm edit 1561. p. 41. inferiour to the Father who dyed only for the (l) So doth D. Willet teach in Sinopsi printed anno 1600. p. 780. as also Caluin and Beza in whole Treatises Elect who performed his mediation not only according to his humanity but also according to his diuinity though in the iudgment of all earned men true Diuinity is impassible who in the time of his Passion besides the death of the body as insufficient for our â—aluatioÌ„ suffred in soule the tormeÌ„ts (m) Melancton vbi supra D. fulke in his retent p. 89. (m) So teacheth Caluin Instit l 2. c. 16. sect 10. D. Whit. contra Duraeum l. 8. p. 556. of Hell briefly who laboured with ignoraÌ„ce (n) So teacheth Beza in resp ad act Colloq Montisb part 1. p. 147. D. Willet Synop. p. 599. 600. passion and euen desperation it selfe Touching the Article of Christs descenâ—â—ng into Hell the Catholikes do belieue â—â—ereby that Christ descended in soule after his Passion into that part of Hell with is called Lymbus Patrum to deliuer from thence the soules of the Iust there detayned till â—is comming of which iudgment are also some learned Protestants But the greatest part of (o) So D. Bilson in his Suruey of â—â—â—ists suffring c. p. 650. 651. 652.
The LutheraÌ„s are generally â—he same opinion Protestants do interpret this article of Christs descending into his (p) D. Willet in his Lymbomastix D. Fulke â—ged by D. Willet in Synop. p. 605. 606. â—â—aue so by the word Hell vnderstanding â—â—e graue But (q) l. 2. Instit c. 16. §. 20. Caluin teacheth that by Christs descending into Hell is vndertood that Christ apprehended God to be â—ost angry and offended with him for our â—akes and that thereupon Christ suffered â—â—eat anxiety and griefe of soule and which is more most blasphemously Caluin teacheth that Christ vttered words of desperation in saying O God my God why hast thou forsaken me Touching the article of Christs ascending into Heauen we Catholikes and the Caluinists do belieue heerby that Christ truly in body ascended vp into Heauen wheraâ— all Lutherans (r) Luther in l. de Sacrament Coenae Domini tom 2. fol. 112. where he saith Credimus quòd Christus iuxta humanitatem est vbique praesens The same is taught by Brentius in Apolog pro Confess Wittenberg And finally by all the Lutherans do teach that Christs Body is in all places with the diuinity and that therfore it did not really after his Passion ascend vp into Heauen it being there both before and after his Passion Thus the Lutherans both in ours and the Protestants iudgments do destroy by this their construction the whole Creed and particulerly Christs Incarnation Natiuity Passion death ascending to Heauen and his comming to Iudgment for supposing Christs body to be in all places all these articles were but apparently or phantastically and not truly and really performed Touching the article of Christs iudging the quicke and dead We Catholikes do beleiue that Christ at his comming to iudgment will so iudge man as that his good workes receauing all their force from our Sauiours PassioÌ„ shal be rewarded wheras the Protestants denying all (s) Calu. l. 3. Instit c. 5. §. â— Bucer in actis Colloq Ratisbon Beza Zwinglius and most ProtestaÌ„ts merit of workes as iniurious and derogatory to his death and Passion doe hould that Christ shall then reward only a bare and speciall (t) Calu. in Antidoto Conc. Tri. Kemnitius in examen Conc. Trident. and most other Protestants fayth Concerning the article I beleiue in the holy Ghost Wheras all Catholikes and many Protestants do beleiue that the holy Ghost is the third Person in the most Blessed Trinity Caluin how euer he was persuaded of the truth or falsehood therof much laboureth notwithstanding to auoyde the force of arguments drawn from the chiefest places of scripture and vsually alleadged by al Antiquity in proofe of the holy Ghost being the third Person in the Trinity Thus we find that Caluin (u) Instit l. 1. c. 13. §. 15. will not haue coÌ„trary to all Antiquity that passage of Scripture Psal 33. By the word of the Lord the Heauens were made and al the Host of theÌ„ by the spirit of his mouth to be vnderstood of the diuinity of the holy Ghost In like sort he reiecteth the argumeÌ„t (x) See of this Subiect against the Trinity Aegidius Hunnius a ProtestaÌ„t in his booke entituled Caluinus IudaizaÌ„s drawn froÌ„ that other most â—â—markable text Iohn 5. There be three that giue testimony in Heauen the Father the word the holy Ghost and these three be one Caluin vpon this place thus saying heerby to take away froÌ„ thence the proofe of the holy Ghost Quòd dicit tres esse vnum ad essentiam non refertur sed ad consensum potiùs Finally Luther was so far from acknowledging the holy Ghost to be the third Person in the Trinity or to confesse the Trinity it selfe that thus he writeth (*) Luther Confut ration Lat. Anima mea odit hoc verbum Homousion vel Consubstantialis My very soule doth hate the word Homousion or Consubstantiall Concerning the article I belieue the holy Catholike Church The Catholikes do belieue this Church to be a visible company of men professing the present Roman Catholike fayth of which some are predestinated others reprobated The Protestants doe belieue this Church to coÌ„sist only of the (y) Confess Augustana Art 7. Luther l. de Conc Eccles Cal. l. 4. Inst. c. 1. §. 2. Elect and Predestinate Touching the Article the Communion of Saints The Catholikes doe heereby belieue such a CommunioÌ„ to be betwixt the Saints in Heauen the Soules in Purgatory men vpon earth that the one part doth help the other with their most auaylable prayers and Intercessions The Protestants deny all such entercourse of benefits betweene these seuerall parts â—f the Church of Christ (z) Calu. l. 3. Instit c. 5. §. 6. Centuriatores Cent. 1. l. 2. c. 4. col 460. Brentius in confes wittenberg c. de Purgatorio accounting the Catholikes doctrine heerein superstitious sacrilegious Lastly touching the Article of forgiuenes of Sinnes we Catholikes do belieue that this remission of sinnes is performed when the soule by a true and inherent Iustice and by the infused gifts of God enioyeth a renouation of herselfe and thereby becommeth truly iust in the sight of God The Protestants disalowing all inherent Iustice doe only acknowlege an (a) Keâ—nit in Examen Concil Trident. Cal. l. 3. Instit c. 11. imputatiue Iustice or righteousnes which coÌ„sisteth in that the Iustice of Christ is as they teach only imputed vnto sinners so as we remayne still sinners though our sinne be not imputed vnto vs through Christs Iustice A doctrine iniurious to the most meritorious Passion and death of Christ Thus haue we runne ouer the chiefe articles of the Creed from whence we collect that seeing as is aboue demonstrated He only belieueth auailably truly the Creed who belieueth it in that sense in which the Apostles did write it seing there are meere different or rather contrary constructions of euery Article giuen by the Catholikes and the Protestants so as if the construction of the Catholiks be true it followeth necessarily that the other of the ProtestaÌ„ts be false or contrarywise we may therefore iustly conclude that it is not sufficient to saluation for any one to say that he beliueth the Creed who belieueth the words of it in general without restrayning them to any peculiar construction giuen eyther by Catholikes or Protestants except he belieue it in that one particuler sense and none other which was intended by the holy Ghost when it was first framed by the Apostles Now in this next place we are to demoÌ„strate that graunting for a tyme by an Hypothesis or supposall that a man did belieue all the Articles of the Creed in their true sense and construction yet followeth it not that this beliefe though it be most necessary were sufficient for a man to obtaine his saluation hereby and the reason hereof is because it is most certayne that there are diuers points of Christian Religion houldeâ— necessarily to be belieued in
iudgment both of Catholikes and Protestants and accordingly are belieued iontly both by Ptotestants and Catholikes yet the sayd pointâ— are not contained or expressed in the Creed Among others I will insist in these following First That there are certayne diuine writings oâ— infallible authority which we commonly callâ— the Scriptures of the old new TestameÌ„t of which Testaments we find no mention in the Creed and yet all men are bound vnder payne of damnation to belieue thaâ— there are such writings since other wayeâ— abstracting from the authority of thâ— Church there were not sufficient meane left to belieue that it were a sinne to breakâ— any of the ten Commaundements oâ— which is more that Christ Iesus was thâ— true Sauiour of the world for though wâ— read in the Creed that he suffered and died yet we read not expresly there that he dyed to redeeme man 2. That there are spiritual Substances which we call Angels which now enioy the most happy sight of God and that many thousands of them did fall presently after their Creation and are become those malignant Spirits which vsually are tearmed Diuells 3. That there is any materiall place of Hel where the wicked are tormented of which we find nothing in the Creed in the iudgment of the Protestants for though the word Hell be mentioned in that Article He descended into Hell yet by the word Hell the graue is vnderstood by most of the Protestants 4. That the paynes of the damned shal be for all eternity and not for a certayne tyme only 5. That Adam did presently vpon his Creation fall from the grace of God and thereby transferred Originall sinne vpon all mankind so as by reason of his fall all men are borne in Originall sinne 6. That the world was once drowned for sin which Inundation is coÌ„monly called Noës floud 7. That our Sauiour whiles he conuersed heere vpon earth did any miracles 8. That S. Iohn Baptist was our Sauiours Precursor or forerunner and that our Sauiour did choose vnto him certayne men for his Apostles which did first preach and plant the Christian fayth throughout the world 9. That Circumcision is now forbidden as a thing most vnlawfull vngodly 10. That there are any Sacraments of the new Testament as the SacrameÌ„t of Baptisme or Eucharist and instituted by Christ for the spirituall good of mans soule These points besides some others all christians aswell Protestants as catholiks do belieue and do hould that their beliefe of these points is necessary to saluation yet not any one of all these Articles is expressed or set downe in the Apostles creed From whence I would conclude that the Apostles Creed cannot be a sufficient boundary to contayne and limit an auayleable fayth For what hope can that man haue of his saluation who belieueth that there are neyther any diuine scriptures nor Angells nor Diuellâ— nor any Decalogue commonly called the Ten commaundements nor that Christ did worke any miracles nor that he dyed for man nor that he instituted any Sacrament and particulerly the Sacraments of Baptisme and the Eucharist nor finally to omit the rest that there is any place of Hell or any eternity of punishment for the damned And heere I am to premonish the Reader that it is no sufficient answere to reply that most of all the foresayd points are expressed in the Scripture and therefore are to be belieued This I say auayleth not seeing heere I dispute against those who maintayne with wonderfull pertinacity of iudgment that it is sufficient to saluation to belieue only the Articles and nothing els which are contayned in he Creed buâ— not any of the former Articles are contayned therein Agayne seing to belieue that there are any diuine scriptures is not expressed in the Creed it conduceth nothing to the answering of this our argument to say that the forementioned articles are proued out of Scripture and therefore are to be belieued Neither secondly can the force of our said argument be auoyded in replying that all the former articles are virtually and potentially comprehended in that article I belieue the holy Church because the Church teacheth that all these articles are to be belieued This is no warantable answere by reason that as these may be reduced to this Arâ—icle of the creed so also may all other points controuerted between the catholikes and the Protestants be in like maÌ„ner reduced to the said Article seeing the church of God setteth downe what is the truth and what is to be belieued in the sayd controuersies bynding her children vnder payne of damnation aswell to belieue the truth in the controuersies of our dayes as to belieue the former mentioned articles which are not expressed in the creed And yet these our Newtrallists in Religion who make the Creed the sole square of their Fayth doe not thinke that those questions of Religion insisted vpon betweene the Catholikes and the Protestants are in belieuing or not belieuing of them any way hurtfull to their Saluation THE SAME PROVED FROM the want of vnity in fayth betweene Catholikes and Protestants in Articles necessary to be belieued and yet not expressed in the Creed CHAP. V. IN this third and last place we wil â—nsist in certayne controuersies of Religion necessarily to be belieued the one way both in the iudgment of â—atholikes and Protestants and not contained in the creed and yet so differently maintayned by Catholikes and Protestants as that graunting the maintayners on the one side hould the truth it followeth that the other party vphouldeth falshood and Heresy Now for the more daungerous wounding of our Newtralizing Christians heerein I will omit heere to speake of the coÌ„trouersies touching Purgatory Praying to Saints Freewill Monachisme and diuers other such like will restrayne my selfe only to those Controuersies the subiect of which Controuersies are taught by the one side to be vnder Christ the immediate meanes of our grace and Saluation denyed by the other party to be of any such force or efficacy for the soules euerlasting good So as if it be shewed that the Protestants and the Catholikes doe maynely dissent in the meanes of obtayning grace and purchasing of saluation it must of necessity be inferred that both the Protestants and Catholikes continuing in such their contrary fayths cannot attayne grace and saluation since not only Philosophy but euen naturall reason teacheth vs that he neuer shall attayne the end who vseth eyther not the same meanes or contrary to those meanes which are only and necessarily instituted to the gayning of the sayd end But to proceed to these points first Concerning the Sacraments in generall the Catholikes do belieue that all of them where no iust impediment is doe conferre grace into the soule of man by the help and continuance of which grace the soule in the end obtayneth saluation The Protestants doe not ascribe any such supernaturall effect or operation of grace to them And to come more particulerly to the Sacraments
Church S. Ierome distinguishing Schisme from Heresy thus discourseth Inter (m) In c. 3. ad Titum Haeresim Schisma hoc interesse arbitramur c. We take this to be the difference betweene Heresy and Schisme That Heresy maintayneth a peruerse and false Doctrine wheras Schisme ab Ecclesia pariter separat in like manner separateth a man from the Church in regard of dissention and disobedience iâ— our Bishops S. Augustine thus woundeth a Schismaâ—â—ke (n) Lib. de fide sym c. ro Haeretici Schismatici congregationes â—as Ecclesias vocant c. Heretikes and Schismaâ—â—kes do call their congregations the Churches But â—eretikes do violate their fayth in belieuing falsely â—â—uching God whereas Schismatikes though they â—â—lieue the same points which we belieue yet throgh â—â—eir dissentions they do not keep fraternall Charity â—herfore we conclude that neyther an Heretike beâ—ogeth to the Catholike Church because he loueth 〈◊〉 God nor a Schismatike because he loueth not â—s neighbour To conclude (o) Lib de fide ad Pet. c. â— S. 3â— Fulgentius agreeth â—ith the former reuerend Fathers thus sayâ—â—g Firmissimè tene c. Belieue for certayne and â—â—ubt not that not only Pagans but also Iewes Heâ—â—tikes Schismatikes who dye out of the Church â—e to goe into euerlasting fire And thus far concerning Schismatikes â—ho because they be not of the Church caÌ„â—ot obtayne saluation which point being â—ade euident by so many authorityes both â—â—uine humane then much more strongâ—â— may we conclude that Heretikes as exâ—â—eding the Schismatiks in prauity and maâ—e and being excluded with them in like â—â—rt out of Christs Church cannot be saâ—ed But before I end this Chapter giue me â—aue good Reader to expatiate a little beyoÌ„d my designed limits O then you Schismatikâ— heere in our owne Countrey whose souleâ— are wholly absorpt in earthy and muddâ— considerations cast your eyes vpon you owne states and vse some small introuersion vpon your selues You see heere whaâ— a daungerous censure the Auncient church of Christ by the mouths of its chiefe Pastorâ— and Doctours hath thundred agaynst you It sayth you are not of Christs Church you aâ— aliens straungers thereunto It further pronounceth that dying in such your state yoâ— are depriued of all hope of saluation Gooâ— God! what stupor and dulnes of yours â— this Are you Christians preferre then Chriâ—â— before the world Feare you God more theâ— man Giue then to God what is Gods and to Casaer what is Caesars Reflect vpon three principles of the Catholike and therefore you owne Religion The first that God ordinarily deriueâ— his grace into mans soule by the conduits oâ— the Sacraments and giueth absolution oâ— ones sinns particulerly by the Sacrament 〈◊〉 Pennance and confession not otherwise you wilfully depriue your selues of the participation of the Sacraments and thereby 〈◊〉 grace and of the remission of your sinnes are you not then as dryed branches void that heauenly iuyce which giueth lyfe the soule you want this grace and forgiuenes of your sinnes where then is your hope of eternall life remeÌ„ber the Apostles words â—nd be afrayd gratia Dei vitae aeterna and do not disioyne those asunder which S. Paul â—ath so inseparably vnited The second is The vncertainty of any parâ—icular mans saluation which point is able â—o stryke you dead through feare and the â—ather since it is no small signe of a mans fuâ—ure damnation deliberately and wilfully yeare after yeare to deuide himselfe from Christs church and from all the spirituall â—nfluences streaming from thence The third That there is a Purgatory the â—aynes whereof though terminable yet are â—nsupportable Suppose then the best that 〈◊〉 that you finally dye with true RepentaÌ„ce â—nd reconciled to Christs church which â—et is not in your owne power but out of â—he maine Ocean of Gods mercy neuertheâ—esse your owne fayth assureth you that you must suffer in that place euen insufferable â—orments for your former disunction that â—our continuance in dissembling thus with God serues but as bellowes the more to â—low that dreadfull fire O how great inteâ—est then are you to pay in the end for the â—nioying of this your mispent tyme If you â—â—e Catholikes though but in hart you belieue all heere sayd and therefore may the more assuredly presage of your owne future misery Yf you doe not belieue these three points of Catholike Religion then are youâ— damned no lesse for want of true Fayth in Christ then otherwise by your vnchaungeable Schismaticall liues for want of due coÌ„formity to the church of Christ Therefore I wish you to awake out of that spirituall letargy of the soule daily meditate on thaâ— of the Apostle Corde creditur ad iustitiam orâ— fit confessio ad salutem (q) Rom. 10. With the hart we belieuâ— vnto iustice but with the mouth Confession is maâ—â— vnto saluation And lest that dreadfull commination and threate of our Lord and Sauiour preuayle with you heerein (r) Luke 12. 〈◊〉 that denyeth me before men shal be denyed before the Angells of God But I will stay my selfe remembring my vndertaken Subiect and will proceed to the next Head THE FORMER TRVTH PROVED from the consideration of the punishments anciently inflicted vpon Heretikes by the Churcâ— of Christ CHAP. IX HAVING in the precedent Chapters shewed the Iudgement of tâ—â— church of Christ by way of doctrine speculation agaynst Heresy and Heretikes in generall we will in â—his place insist in relating the practice of the â—ayd church agaynst Heretikes consisting in â—he punishments aunciently inflicted vpon Heretikes by the authority of Gods church from the consideration wherof we may easily gather that the church of Christ in those â—ymes infallibly taught that Heretikes so liuing and dying could not be saued seeing â—t would neuer impose such multiplicity of â—euere punishments vpoÌ„ men for their houlling of those doctrines which might stand with the saluation of the belieuers of them And first we are heere to obserue that the punishments inflicted vpon offendours by the church were eyther Ecclesiasticall or Politicall Ciuill The first of Ecclesiasticall punishments â—or Heretikes was Excommunication by the which Heretikes were driuen away from â—he Sacraments were depriued of the common suffrages and prayers of the whole church and finally banished from the community comfort of the godly and faythfull This censure of Excommunication of Heretiks is most auncient seeing that it had 〈◊〉 beginning from the first times that counâ—ells began to be celebrated for the extirpaâ—ion and rooting out of Heresies is founded vpon all those places of Scripture in the foregoing chapters alleadged agaynst Heresy and Heretikes Another Ecclesiasticall censure agaynst Heretikes is the depriuing them of all the vse of spirituall power and authority whether it be of order or Iurisdiction This kind of power belongeth only to Ecclesiasticall Persons or the Cleargy according heereto if a Priest became an open Heretike he was
obiect of implicite fayth thâ— which articles as a man is bound implicitely to belieue in the fayth of the church so â—he is bound expressely not to belieue any thing contrary to the sayd articles Seing then diuers Controuersies betwene the Catholikes the Protestants are included vnder this implicite fayth and that the church of God houldeth of them but one way It manifestly followeth that the contrary belieuers of those points doe erre in their beliefe and consequently for want of this true implicite and necessary Fayth cannot be saued 3. A third reason may be this It is proper and peculiar to vertues infused such â—e Fayth Hope Charity that euery such vertue is wholy extinguished by any one act contrary to the said vertue Thus for example one mortall sinne taketh away all chaâ—ity and grace according to that (f) Matth. 28. He that â—ffendeth mone is made guilty of all One act of Despayre destroyeth the whole vertue of Hope then by the same reason one Heresy wholy corrupteth extinguisheth all true â—ayth Therefore seeing Fayth is a Theoloâ—icall and infused Vertue this fayth is deâ—royed with one act of Heresy whether it â—e about Purgatory Prayer to Saints Freewil or any other Controuersy between the Catholiks the ProtestaÌ„ts Therfore whosoeuer denyeth Purgatory or any of the rest graunting their doctrines to be true is depriued of all infused fayth touching any articles of Christian Religion whether they concerne the Trinity or the Incarnation or any other fundamentall point which he may seeme to belieue But without (f) Hebr. 11. Fayth that is without true infused and Theologicall Fayth it is impossible to please God as the Apostle assureth vs. 4. A fourth reason shal be this It is most certaine that what generall propension nature or rather God himselfe by nature as by his instrument hath engrafted in all men the same is in it selfe most true certayne and warrantable As for example Nature hath implanted in each mans soule a secret remorse of conscience for sinnes transgressions committed as also a feare of future punishment to be inflicted for the sayd sinnes perpetrated therefore from hence it may infallibly be concluded that sinne it selfe is to be auoyded and that after this life there is a retribution of punishment for our offences acted in this world since otherwise it wold follow God should insert in mans soule idlely vainely and as directed to no end certayne naturall impressions and instincts which to affirme were most derogatorâ— to his diuine Wisdome and repugnanâ— to that aunciently receaued Axiome God Nature worketh nothing in vayne Now to apply this we find both by history and by experience that diuers zealous feruent Professours of al Religions whatsoeuer both true and false haue bin most ready to expose their liues in defence of any impugned part or branch of their Religion From which vndaunted resolution of theirs we certainly collect that this their constant determination of defending the least point of their Religion proceedeth from a general instinct of God impressed in mans soule teaching each man that death it selfe is rather to be suffered then we are to deny any part of our Fayth and Religion And thus according heereto we find that euen the Athenians who were Heathens though they did err touching the particuler Obiect heerin as worshipping false Gods were most cautelous that no one point should be infringed or violated touching the worship of their Gods The like Religious seuerity was practized by the Iewes as Iosephus witnesseth And God himselfe euen in his owne written word threatneth that (g) Apoc. 22. Whosoeuer â—hall eyther adde or diminish to the booke of the Apocalyps written by the Euangelist from him he wil take away his part out of the booke of life Now â—f such daunger be threatned for adding to or taking from more or lesse then was set downe by the Euangelist in this one booke how can then both the Catholiks and Protestants haue their names written in the booke of life Since it is certayne graunted on all sides that eyther the Catholike addeth more to the fayth of Christ then was by him instituted or the Protestant taketh from the sayd fayth diuers Articles which Christ and his Apostles did teach But to returne to our former reason From all this we deduce that no points of true Christian Religion are of such cold IndiffereÌ„cy as that they are not much to be regarded or that they may be maintayned contrary waies by contrary spirits without any daunger to mans Saluation but that they are of that nature worth and dignity as man is to vndergoe all kind of torments yea death it selfe before he yield or suffer the least relapse in denying any of the sayd verityes 5. The fift and last reason to proue that the maintayning of false doctrines now questioned betweene the Christians of these tymes are most preiudiciall and hurtfull to the obtaining of our Heauenly blisse wherin at this tyme I will insist may be taken from the consideration of the different effects which the contrary doctrines particulerly betweene the Protestants and Catholikes produce in mens soules touching the exercising of vertue or vice Since most vndoubted it is that the belieuing of such opinions which of their owne nature do impell and as it were violently draw the soule to vice loosenes and impurity of manners and conuersation cannot stand considering Gods infinite hate to sinne and sinners with the hope of eternall happynes And the chiefe reason hereof besides others is this In that the Will which is the seate of vertue or vice doth necessarily irresistably worke as the Vnderstanding in which resideth Fayth all false doctrine doth dictate to the Will Now then the Vnderstanding being infected with Heresies tending directly to the planting of vice and eradicating of all vertue in the soule it of necessity followeth that the Will must worke and exercise it selfe according to those false principles which the Vnderstanding suggesteth to the will for true this with the greater facility in regard of the pronesse of mans nature throgh our first Parents fall enclined to liberty pleasure and sensuality But because the subiect of this reason is a large field to walke in and the truth therof is to appeare by seuerall instances drawne from diuers particuler doctrines maintayned at this present by the Protestants and all breathing nothing but vice dissolution and all turpitude in manners therefore I will reserue the ensuing Chapter for the fuller manifestation of the truth in this point THE SAME PROVED FROM the different effects of Vertue and Vice which Catholike and Protestant Religion doe cause in their Professours CHAP. XI THE first doctrine of this Nature wherein we will insist mantayned by the Protestants denyed by the Catholikes is the Impossibility of keeping Gods commaundements according heerto (a) Ser. de Moyse Luther sayth The ten commaundements appertayne not to Christians with whom Fox conspireth in
(b) Act. mon. p. 1335. these words The Commaundements were giuen not to doe them but 〈◊〉 know our damnation and to call for mercy to God Doctor Willet also saying The (c) In Sinop Papismi p. 564. law remayneth still impossible to be kept by vs through the weâ—kenes of our flesh neyther doth God giue vs abilityâ— keep it but Christ hath fulfilled it for vs. And â—â—nally Doctour Whitaker in that his seâ—tence (d) Contra Camp rat 8. Qui credunt ij non sunt sub lege sed sub gratia Quid plura Christiani execrâ—tione legis liberantur They who belieue are 〈◊〉 vnder the law but vnder grace What more in this point is to be sayed Christians are freed from the curse of the law Now then if Christians be freed from the curse of the law wherin the ten Commaundments are contayned how can the breach of them be any way hurtfull to the violators of them And if the Commandments were neither giuen vs to keep nor we haue power to keep them to what end should any man endeauour to keep theÌ„ Why should the Thiefe forbeare to steale or the Homicide to commit murther whoseeth not how this doctrine discourageth a man from liuing vertuously by bridling his vnruly and sensuall desires 2. Touching Chastity The Protestants do teach that Chastity is not in our power And hence it is that Luther thus wryteth It is (e) Tom. 5. Wittenb ser de matrimonio not in our power to be without a woman c. It is not in our power that it should be stayed or omitted but it is as necessary as to eate drinke purge make cleane the nose c. To whom omitting all others for greater breuity M. Perkins subscribeth saying The vow of (f) In his reformed Catholike pag. 161. CoÌ„tineÌ„cy is not in the power of him that voweth Now this doctrine being imbraced for true how forcibly doth it inuite or rather impell all people vnmaryed both men or women to satisfy their lust by their owne incontinent liues In like sort what great encouragemeÌ„t doth it giue to maryed persons to violate the bond of matrimony when either of the persons through absence or long sickenes or some other suddayne and accidentall impotency cannot render the act and due of matrimony And the partyes thus sinning eyther maryed or vnmaryed being expostulated and charged with their offence therein may they not iustly reply in excuse of themselues that they are not to be blamed or rebuked for their incontinency seing by their owne doctrine and Religion they are expresly taught that they haue not the guilt of chastity and that it is not in their power to liue chastly continently 3. The Protestants doctrine of Venial and Mortall sinne doth wonderfully extenuate and lessen the atrocity and malice of sinne in the belieuers of that doctrine For the Protestants do teach that there is noâ— such difference of sinnes in themselues buâ— that the most grieuous sinnes whatsoeuer being perpetrated and committed by any one that hath true fayth are but veniall their reason heereof is because in their doctrine no sinnes are imputed to those whâ— haue true fayth Thus accordingly D. Whitaker teacheth (g) De Eccles cont Bellarm. Controuer â— q. 5. p. 301. Si quis actum fidei habet 〈◊〉 peccata non nocent Sinne is not hurtfull to him whâ— actually belieueth who did learne this of his great mayster Luther thus writing of this point (h) Luther in his sermons Englished printed 1578. pag. 176. No worke is disallowed of God vnles the authour therof be disallowed before All which being graunted as true doctrine it must needs follow that who shall take himselfe to be one of the Faythfull as euery Protestant is bound by his owne Religion to belieue of himselfe shall make small accompt of committing any sinne considering he is taught by the former doctrine to belieue that to vse the words of one of their owne maysters (i) Wotton in his answere to the lute Popish Articles pag. 92. Sinne is pardoned him as soone as it is committed 4. The Protestants doctrine of Reprobation and denyall of Freewill mightily disanimateth and discourageth the belieuers thereof from imbracing of vertue and eschewing of sinne for if it be true as this their Doctrine suggesteth that some men are borne euen from their mothers wombe Reprobats and thrall to damnation and cannot be saued to what end should they seeke their owne saluation by a true Fayth auoyding of sinne and practizing of a penitentiall vertuous lyfe Or if we haue not Freewill with the concurrence of Gods grace to do well as the former doctrine instructeth why should we giue our best endeauours to imbrace vertue and fly all vice Since it is not in our power according to the Protestants fayth to exercise the one and fly the other 5. To this may be adioyned the ProtestaÌ„ts like doctrine of Predestination and their supposed certainty of Saluation For admit that men be Predestinated without any respect or reference to their works and lyues and that do what wickednes they can imagine yet certaine it is that they shal be saued is not this Doctrine most potent and forcible to diswade all the belieuers therof from exercising an austere pious and Religious lyfe and to engulfe them easily in all kind of enormities and sinnes and the rather considering how precipitious headlong mans nature is to sinne to decline all rigorous and exemplar courses of vertue especially if so the case stands that man can neither aduantage or hurt himselfe by any such different maner of lyfe Now that by the Protestants Doctrine no sinne can endaunger the Predestinate in regard of their certainty of SaluatioÌ„ appeareth seeing according heerin we find D. Fulke thus to say of Dauids adultery (k) In his tower disput with Edm. Campian the 2. dayes coÌ„ference Dauid when he committed adultery was and remained the child of God And Beza himselfe to the like purpose thus wryteth therof (l) In Respons ad Colloq Montisbel part altera p. 71. Dauid by his adultery and murther did not loose the holy Ghost So powerfully do these their positions incline men to satisfye their desires in all vice impiety and sensuality 6. Touching the Protestants Doctrine of Iustification by Fayth only which potentially includes diuers of the other points heere set downe and which position of it owne nature excludeth from Iustification all works how vertuous and pious soeuer we find the Protestants thus to say And first Luther speaking heereof bursteth forth with wonderfull rashnes saying (*) Tom. 1. prop. 3. Fides nisi sit sine c Vnlesse fayth be without the least Good workes it doth not iustify nay it is not fayth That Iustification by fayth only extinguisheth all exercise of vertue is iustifyed not only by experience of these dayes but also by the acknowledgmeÌ„t euen of some learned Protestants for thus Iacobus Andraeas a famous
Protestant complayning and dislyking this Doctrine writeth (m) Conc. 4. in c. 21. Lucae A serious and Christian discipline is censured with vs as a new Papacy a monachisme they say we haue now learned to be saued by only fayth in Christ and we cannot satisfy by our fasting and prayer and therfore permit that we may giue ouer these seeing we may be saued otherwyse by the only grace of God And to the end sayth this Authour further that all the world may knowe they be no Papists nor trust in good workes they take course to put none in practice With whose true iudgment heerin M. Stubbs an English Protestant seemeth to conspire saying (n) In his Motiues to good works printed 1566. p. 42. The Protestant trusteth to be saued by a bare and naked fayâ— deceauing himselfe without good works thâ—â—â—fore either careth not for them or at least setteth litle by them And thus much touching gooâ— works wholly exiled and banished by thâ— Doctrine of Iustification by fayth only Now that this Doctrine of Iustification by only fayth doth incorporate as it were within it selfe and admit all kind of sinnes appeareth no lesse by the frequent acknowledgments of the most learned Protestants And first Luther thus wryteth thereof (o) Tom. 2. wittenb de capt Babilon fol. 74. A Christian baptized is so riche that although hâ— would he cannot loose his saluation by any sinnâ— how great soeuer vnlesse he will not belieue Anâ— Luther in another place (q) Luther in loc com class 5. c. 27. As nothing iustifyeth but beliefe so nothing sinneth but vnbeliefe To which Doctrine D. Whtaker as aboue is shewed accordeth saying (r) Vbi supra Sinnes are not hurtfull to him that belieueth And thus much now touching the Doctrine of Iustification by fayth where we see euen by the confession of the Protestants that this Doctrine preuayleth in the professours thereof no lesse for the committing of all sinne and iniquity then for the expelling and banishing of all good works vertue and deuotion 7. Touching the Protestants particuler Doctrines of Fasting voluntary Pouerty and Chastity or Virginity the three steps of Iacobs adder by the which a vertuous soule ascenâ—eth to Heauen And first of fasting Perkins â—eacheth thus (s) In his Reformed Catholike p. 220. fasting in it selfe is but a thing â—ndifferent as is eating and drinking with whome coÌ„spireth D. Willet in more full tearnes saying (t) In Synops pag. 243. Neither is God better worshipped by eaâ—ing or not eating Voluntary pouertie is so debased by the Protestants Doctrine as that the foresaid Willet thus teacheth thereof (u) In Synops pag. 245. He is an enemy to the glory of God who chaungeth his rich estate wherin he may serue God for a poore So contrary he is to the iudgement of our Sauiour saying (x) Mat. 19. If thou wilt be perfect goe sel thy substance giue to the poore and thou shalt haue a treasure in Heauen Lastly touching single lyfe in comparison of Marriage Luther thus sayth (y) Tom. 5. wittenb in exeg ad c. 7. 1. Cor. fol. 107. We conclude that Marriage is as gould and spirituall or single lyfe as dung And D. Whitaker likewyse teacheth thereof in this maner saying (z) Contra Camp rat 8. Virginity is not simply good but after a certaine maner it is neuer better then Mariage but in regard of the circumstance that is of the troubles accoÌ„panying Mariage Now I heere demaund with what encouragement can any man goe about to practice these foresayd vertues of fasting voluntary pouerty and perpetuall virginity if he be firmely and inwardly persuaded that the Protestants former positions 〈◊〉 Doctrines touching the sayd vertues bâ— true and agreable to Christs sacred Institutions 8. But to hasten to an end in this matter I will conclude with the Protestant Doctrines touching Purgatory and Confession oâ— Sinnes And as concerning confession of Sinnes it is found by experience that besides the first Institution therof by (a) Mat. 18. Ioâ—n 20. Christ a man is much debarred from sinninge through the shame that he is to endure by confessing his most secret sinnes to a Preist as on the contrary it much enbouldeneth one to sinne if he be persuaded by his owne Religion that confession of them alone to God is sufficient Touching the Doctrine of Purgatory How doth the denyall of this Doctrine open the sluce to all liberty and iniustice Since by the Protestants teaching that no temporal punishment remayneth for sinnes once remitted it taketh away all restitution of things wrongfully detayned all satisfaction for committing of former sinnes and finally all mortification of body and soule and to conclude it freeth a man of all feare of suffering any punishment after this lyfe and this vnder colour that Christ hath satisfyed for the sinnes of all the world by which reason we might take away prayer or that Christ prayed for all in the garden But now to cast our eye backe vpon the foresayd Doctrines If all the different opinions of fayth in Controuersie betwene the Catholiks the Protestants were meerely speculatiue without any reference to the vertuous or vicious working operation of the Will deryued from them then with greater shewe of reason in a vulgar iudgment it might be auerred that supposing they teach not the fundamentall points of Christian fayth they might be either affirmatiuely or negatiuely houlden without any daunger of saluation such were the Heresyes of (b) See heerof S. Augustine Haeres 43. Origen teaching that the Diuells in the end of the world should be saued Of Cyprian touching Rebaptization and diuers such like from the maintayning of which points either way the Will in respect of any externall working or operation drawne from thence can sucke noe poyson But the Case is farre different in the former Doctrines set downe aboue for we fynd that the sayd Doctrines which breath nothing but all dissolution and turpitude of manners euen in speculation do most forcibly immediately touch the pulse of the Will the Will strongly beating and indeed breaking out into outward actions of vicâ— and lyberty according as shee remayneth afore infected with the contagion and poyson of the former Doctrinall speculations Well then this vpon necessary inference being graunted so as the working effect and force of the sayd Doctrines are in the Will nothing but liberty dissolution of manners improbitie sensualitie and sinne I referre to the iudgment of any man whether the sayd Doctrines be but points of Indifferency oâ— noe and may be defended either way without preiudice to the beleiuers fayth and daunger to his Saluation as our Formallists doe auerre For can it possibly be conceaued that these Doctrines should be reputed as indifferent to mans SaluatioÌ„ or in themselues true which as is proued most strongly drawe the will to all vice against which God hath thundred out such dreadfull threats as where it is sayd Psal
91. All they that workâ— iniquity shal be confounded And againe Ecclesiast 40. Death bloud contention edge of sword oppression hunger contrition whippes are created for sinners And further Psal 9.10 God shaâ— raigne snares of fyre vpon sinners brimstome with tempestuous wynds shal be the portion of their cuppâ— (c) Matth. 25. our Sauiour speaking of Sinners saith Depart you accursed into euerlasting fire Beside infinite other places of like nature Now to the former Premises may I adâ—oyne the Confessions euen of Protestants â—hemselues who confesse that the liues of Catholikes are commonly farre more verâ—uous and of better edification then the liues â—f the Protestants who by their owne ackâ—owledgments lye groueling in all sensuaâ—itie For thus euen Luther sayth heereof When we were (d) Dominica 26. post Trinitatem seduced by the Pope euery man â—id willingly followe good works and now euery â—an neither sayth nor knoweth any thing but how 〈◊〉 get all to himselfe by exaction pillage theft lying â—sury c. to which ConfessioÌ„ to omit diuers others (e) In loc com cap. de Decalogo in explanat tertij praecepti Musculus a forward ProtestaÌ„t subcribeth sayng Vt verum fateor c. That 〈◊〉 may confesse the truthe heerein they are become 〈◊〉 vnlike to themselues that wheras in the Papacy â—hey were Religious in their Errours and Superstiâ—â—â—n now in the light of the knowne truth they are â—ore profane then the very Sonnes of the worlde Which disparity of liues and conuersation â—an be iustly ascribed to no other cause then â—n that the Protestants were ready to put in â—ractise what afore they had learned by speculation of their owne Doctrines which â—oint then being thus I meane that the Doctrine of the Protestants do depresse vertue â—nd blandish contenance and exalt vice â—nd thereupon the liues of the Protestants by confession of themselues and to the disedyfying of their followers are becomâ— actually farre worse and lesse vertuous theâ— the liues of the Catholikes I here demaund how it can be warranted by any shew oâ— reason that these Doctrines of the Protestants begetting so great a chaunge froâ— vertue to vice in their professours can bâ— reputed but as points of Indifferency Oâ— that men belieuing them practising theâ— in their conuersation and finally dying iâ— them can be saued So contrary it is to oâ— Sauiours prescript If thou (f) Mat. 19. wilt enter into lifâ— keep the Commaundements Sinne being indeâ— so great an enemy to mans Saluation as thâ— God himselfe vouchsafed to be incarnate 〈◊〉 to suffer an opprobrious death only for thâ— taking away of the sinnes of the world THE SAME PROVED FROâ— the fearefull deaths of the first broachers of Protestancy CHAP. XII IN this next place we will briâ—fly take a suruey of the particulâ—â— deaths of some few of the chiefâ— Protestants who haue byn thâ— first stampers or broachers of the Controueâ—sies betweene the Catholikes and the Prâ—testants then we will leaue to the iudâ—ment of others whether those kinds of death 〈◊〉 befal in Gods accustomed proceedings 〈◊〉 men who first did set on foote and mainâ—yne points and positions of Religion of â—at Indifferency as that either the belieuing 〈◊〉 not belieuing of them may well comâ—ort and stand togeather with mans salâ—ation To beginne with Luther omitting to â—eake either of his vicious life or of the liues â—f others heereafter set downe though conâ—â—ssed and displayed for such by many of â—â—eir owne Brethren It is certayne that â—uther (g) Cochlaeus in vita Lutheri Whose sudden death is also confessed by Dauid Chitracus an eminent Protestant in orat funebri Christophori Ducis Megapolitani these words Lutherus ipse vesperi mensae assidens paucis post diam noctem horis decessit dyed very sudainly for when at â—â—pper being in good health he had fed â—uteously vpon great variety of meates â—ntertayned his guests then with him with â—itty but dissolute discourses the very â—â—me night he dyed Zwinglius was slayne in the warrs of Gerâ—any vndertaken for Religion only in â—hich warres he dyed not as a Preacher but 〈◊〉 a warriour armed in the field and yet 〈◊〉 such sort that Gualterus an earnest Proâ—â—stant sayth thus of him (h) Gualterus in his booke intiâ—led Apologia pro Zwinglio p. 31. Nostri illi c. â—iuers of vs are not affrayd to pronounce Zwinglius haue dyed in sinne and therefore to haue dyed the â—â—me of Hell (i) Cochlaeus in Actis Lutheri 1537. Oecolampadius the reputed Bishop of Basill where he lyeth buried and a man most forward in spreading the points of ProtestaÌ„cy went healthfull to bed but was found by his wife dead in the morning in his bed Andreas Carolstadius an eminent Protestant and a great aduauncer of the supposed Ghospell was killed by the Diuell as certayne (k) In their Epistle de morte Carolstadij ministers euen of Basill do iustify Iacobus Andreas a famous Lutheran and in other points an earnest Protestant lyueâ— and dyed as (l) Hospinian in histor Sacra part 2. fol. 389. Hospinian the Protestant wryteth as if he had had no God but MammoÌ„ Bacchus he neuer praying neyther going to bed norysing from thence and that in the residue of hiâ— life he shewed no Godlines Who (*) So ZaÌ„chius the ProtestaÌ„t affirmeth in his Epistles printed 1609. l. 2. p. 340. also was once taken in Adultery Caluin the refiner of all Protestancy and chiefe supporter of all controuerted points agaynst the Catholikes dyed being consumed with lyce and wormes extremely blaspheming agaynst God of whose death (m) In Theolog. Caluinist l. 1. fol. 72. This particular manner of Caluins death is witnessed by Ioannes Herennius a Caluinist preacher who was present as Caluins death as he witnesseth in his libello de vita Caluini Conradus Schlusselburg a famous Protestant thus wryteth Deus manu sua potents c. God with his mighty hand did visit Caluin for he despayred of his saluation called vpon the Diuells and gaue vp his soule swearing and blaspheming Caluin dyed being eaten away with lyce for they sâ—bred about his priuy members that none about him could endure the stench and smell Thus far the foresayd Protestant Finally Melancthon a great pillar of Protestancy made so bad an end as that Morlinus his owne scholler and a forward Protestant despayred of his saluation thus writing in his publike Lectures Si possem redimere c. If I could redeeme the Saluation of our mayster Philip Melancthon with the perill of my life I would do it But he is caryed to the horrible tribunall of God to plead his cause there c. See hereof also Slusselburge in Theolog. Calu. l. 2. art 10. Now then seeing all these men belieued all the fundamental points of Christian Religion as the Trinity the Incarnation the Passion c. seeing also they were the most principall men that first introduced disseminated ProtestaÌ„cy
repugnancy betwixt both their beliefes Therfore if both of them though wanting this Vnity can be saued then hath the Apostle falsely and erroneously described and delineated the faith of a Christian But to reflect vpon the former passages is any man so stupid as to dreame that that doctrine should be true which giueth so open a lye to so many vnanswerable texts of Gods holy writ touching the condemning of Heretiks in generall as also touching the definition excellency and propriety of true Fayth It is impossible it is not to be imagined Gods word is like himselfe most true sacred and inuiolable and therefore it iustly witnesseth of it selfe that (i) Ioan. 2. scriptura 〈◊〉 potest solui And agayne (k) Mat. 24. Caelum terra transibunt verba autem mea non transibunt Heauen and earth shall passe but my wordes shall 〈◊〉 passe But to proceed further touching the forâ—sayd want of vnity and disagreements iâ— Fayth If euery Christian might be saued iâ— his owne Religion then might those be saued which belieue the Articles of the creâ—â— in a most different sense and manner theâ— which what can be more rashely and exorbitantly spoken seeing there is but one true intended sense by the Apostles of the creed the which if we attayne not then do we belieue that which is false but to belieue the creed in a false sense is no better then not to belieue it at all And therefore it would follow by way of inference that he might be saued who belieued not any one article of the creed at all Now that the Catholikes Protestants doe belieue the articles of the creed in different or rather contrary senses and consequently that the one side belieueth it in a false and erroneous sense is aboue proued in the fourth chapter If it be heere replyed that the maintayners of this doctrine do so far yield that they only are to be saued which in a true sense belieue the creed yet by this their restraint they condemne al those others who belieue â—t in any other sense different from that intended by the holy Ghost and the Apostles â—nd consequently they condemne in their â—udgement and depriue of saluation eyther â—he Catholikes or Protestants since of necessity the one of these do belieue the creed not in the true but in a false and hereticall â—ense and construction different from that of the Apostles But supposing that the Caâ—holikes and Protestants belieued the creed in that true sense inteÌ„ded by the holy Ghost yet if our Newtrallists would haue the creed the square or rule thereby to measure our fayth then marke the Absurdities following For by this doctrine one might be saued who belieued not that there were any Scriptures at all written by the Prophets Apostles since the creed maketh no mention of any such deuine writings .. In like sort he might be saued who did not belieue there were any Angells or Diuells or that there is a materiall place of Hell or that the pains thereof are eternall or that Adam did presently vpon his creation fall from grace thereby transferred Originall sinne vpon all his posterity or that our Sauiour whilst he conuersed heere on earth wrought any myracles or made choyce of certayne men to be his Apostles to preach the Christian fayth throughout all the whole world or that he died for the saluation of mankind for though we read in the creed that he dyed and suffered yet the end why he dyed is not expressed in the creed Or that circumcision is now forbiddem antiquated or finally that there are any SacrameÌ„ts of the new Testament as Baptisme the Eucharist c. I say by our Newtrallists Religion he should be saued who belieued none of the foresayd articles seeing not any one of them is expressed or set downe in the Apostles creed and yet the beliefe of the sayd Articles is necessarily exacted and required to Saluation in the iudgment both of Catholikes and Protestants both which parties doe with an vnanimous consent teach the necessity of belieuing the sayd articles But to proceed further and to come to the different Articles of fayth differenly belieued by the Catholike and Protestant and yet not expressed in the creed and articles of such nature as that they are houlden by the catholikes to be instituted by our Sauiour as subordinate yet necessary meanes of the grace of God and of our Saluation whereas the Protestants as not belieuing at all the sayd articles doe wholy disclayme from acknowledging any such meanes These Articles I haue recited aboue to wit That Sacraments in general do conferre grace That a Child dying without Baptisme cannot be saued That mortall sinne is not remitted without the Sacrament of Pennance and Confession That we are to adore with supreme Honour the blessed Sacrament That not only fayth but also works do iustify man That a Christian by thinking himselfe iust is not thereby become iust That euery Christian hath by God sufficient grace offered to saue his soule And that therfore God on his part would haue all men saued That without keeping the ten Commandements a man cannot be saued Finally that all Christians ought vpon payne of eternall damnation to communicate in Sacraments and doctrine with the Church of Rome and to submit themselues in all due obedience to the supreme Pastor of that Church In all which points the Protestants doe belieue directly the contrary condemning vs of Heresy Superstition yea Idolatry for our belieuing the foresayd points Now I say seing the former articles doe immediatly touch and concerne eyther remission of our sinnes or grace of our soule or our Iustification or our due honour and adoration to our Sauiours Body being accompanyed with his diuinity or Lastly our communion with Christ his church and head thereof in any of which as concerning so neerly our eternall happynes who erreth cannot possibly be saued And seing the Protestants as is sayd doe in all the sayd points maintaine the iust contrary to the catholikes and therby do abandon the catholikes acknowledged meanes of their Saluation I heere aske in all sobernes of iudgement what can be reputed for a greater absurdity then to affirme with our Newtrallists that the Catholikes and Protestants notwithstanding their so different contrary beliefe answerable practice in the former Articles so neerly touching mans Saluation may both be saued Seing it must needes be that eyther the catholikes shal be damned for setting downe certayne meanes of our Saluation contrary to Christs mynd and Institution supposing the sayd articles to be false or that the Protestants shal be damned for reiecting the former meanes of Saluation instituted by Christ admitting them to be true But to passe forward If euery Christian might be saued in his Religion in belieuing only the fundamentall points of the Trinity the Incarnation c. then hath the church of Christ eueÌ„ in her Primitiue dayes at what time the (*) D. Iewell in his