any actual Obligation unto the Curse of the Law unless they should fall into such sins as should ipso facto forfeit their justified estate and transfer them from the Covenant of Grace into the Covenant of Works which we believe that God in his Faithfulness will preserve them from And although sin cannot be actually pardoned before it be actually committed yet may the obligation unto the Curse of the Law be virtually taken away from such sins in justified persons as are consistent with a justified estate or the Terms of the Covenant of Grace antecedently unto their actual commission God at once in this sense forgiveth all their Iniquities and healeth all their Diseases redeemeth their life from Destruction and crowneth them with loving kindness and mercies Psal. 103.2 3. Future sins are not so pardoned as that when they are committed they should be no sins which cannot be unless the commanding power of the Law be abrogated But their respect unto the Curse of the Law or their power to oblige the justified person thereunto is taken away Still there abideth the true nature of sin in every inconformity unto or transgression of the Law in justified persons which stands in need of daily actual pardon For there is no man that liveth and sinneth not and if we say that we have no sin we do but deceive our selves None are more sensible of the Guilt of sin none are more troubled for it none are more earnest in supplications for the pardon of it than justified persons For this is the effect of the Sacrifice of Christ applyed unto the Souls of Believers as the Apostle declares Heb. 10.1 2 3 4 10 14. that it doth take away Conscience condemning the Sinner for sin with respect unto the Curse of the Law But it doth not take away Conscience condemning sin in the Sinner which on all considerations of God and themselves of the Law and the Gospel requires Repentance on the part of the sinner and actual pardon on the part of God Whereas therefore one Essential part of Justification consisteth in the pardon of our sins and sins cannot be actually pardoned before they are actually committed our present enquiry is whereon the continuation of our Justification doth depend notwithstanding the Interveniency of sin after we are justified whereby such sins are actually pardoned and our persons are continued in a state of Acceptation with God and have their right unto Life and Glory uninterrupted Justification is at once compleat in the Imputation of a perfect Righteousness the Grant of a Right and Title unto the heavenly Inheritance the actual pardon of all past sins and the virtual pardon of future sins but how or by what means on what terms and conditions this state is continued unto those who are once justified whereby their Righteousness is everlasting their Title to Life and Glory indefeazable and all their sins are actually pardoned is to be enquired For answer unto this enquiry I say 1 It is God that Justifieth and therefore the continuation of our Justification is his Act also And this on his part depends on the immutability of his Counsel the unchangeableness of the everlasting Covenant which is ordered in all things and sure the Faithfulness of his Promises the Efficacy of his Grace his complacency in the Propitiation of Christ with the power of his Intercession and the irrevocable Grant of the Holy Ghost unto them that do believe which things are not of our present enquiry 2. Some say that on our part the continuation of this state of our Justification depends on the Condition of Good works that is that they are of the same consideration and use with Faith it self herein In our Justification it self there is they will grant somewhat peculiar unto Faith but as unto the continuation of our Justification Faith and Works have the same influence into it Yea some seem to ascribe it distinctly unto Works in an especial manner with this only proviso that they be done in Faith For my part I cannot understand that the continuation of our Justification hath any other dependencies than hath our Justification it self As Faith alone is required unto the one so Faith alone is required unto the other although its operations and effects in the discharge of its duty and office in Justification and the continuation of it are divers nor can it otherwise be To clear this Assertion two things are to be observed 1. That the continuation of our Justification is the continuation of the Imputation of Righteousness and the pardon of sins I do still suppose the imputation of Righteousness to concur unto our Justification although we have not yet examined what Righteousness it is that is imputed But that God in our Justification imputeth Righteousness unto us is so expresly affirmed by the Apostle as that it must not be called in question Now the first act of God in the imputation of Righteousness cannot be repeated And the actual pardon of sin after Justification is an effect and consequent of that imputation of Righteousness If any man sin there is a Propitiation deliver him I have found a Ransome Wherefore unto this actual pardon there is nothing required but the application of that Righteousness which is the cause of it and this is done by Faith only 2. The Continuation of our Justification is before God or in the sight of God no less than our absolute Justification is We speak not of the sense and evidence of it unto our own Souls unto peace with God nor of the evidencing and manifestation of it unto others by its effects but of the continuance of it in the sight of God Whatever therefore is the means condition or cause hereof is pleadable before God and ought to be pleaded unto that purpose So then the enquiry is What it is that when a Justified person is guilty of Sin as guilty he is more or less every day and his Conscience is pressed with a sense thereof as that only thing which can endanger or intercept his justified Estate his Favour with God and Title unto Glory he betakes himself unto or ought so to do for the continuance of his State and pardon of his Sins what he pleadeth unto that purpose and what is available thereunto That this is not his own Obedience his personal Righteousness or fulfilling the condition of the new Covenant is evident from 1 the experience of Believers themselves 2 Testimony of Scripture and 3 the Example of them whose cases are recorded therein 1. Let the experience of them that do believe be enquired into for their Consciences are continually exercised herein What is it that they betake themselves unto what is it that they plead with God for the continuance of the pardon of their Sins and the acceptance of their persons before him Is it any thing but Soveraign Grace and Mercy through the Blood of Christ Are not all the Arguments which they plead unto this end taken from the
Punishment threatened been immediately inflicted unto the utmost of what was contained in it this could have been no Question For Man had died immediately both temporally and eternally and been cast out of that state wherein alone he could stand in any relation unto the preceptive power of the Law He that is finally executed hath fulfilled the Law so as that he ows no more obedience unto it But 2. God in his Wisdom and Patience hath otherwise disposed of things Man is continued a Viator still in the way unto his end and not fully stated in his eternal and unchangeable condition wherein neither Promise nor Threatning Reward nor Punishment could be proposed unto him In this condition he falls under a twofold consideration 1. Of a guilty person and so is obliged unto the full punishment that the Law threatens This is not denied 2. Of a Man a Rational Creature of God not yet brought unto his Eternal End 3. In this state the Law is the only instrument and means of the continuance of the Relation between God and him Wherefore under this consideration it cannot but still oblige him unto Obedience unless we shall say that by his sin he hath exempted himself from the Government of God Wherefore it is by the Law that the Rule and Government of God over Men is continued whilest they are in statu Viatorum For every Disobedience every Transgression of its Rule and Order as to its commanding Power casteth us afresh and further under its Power of obliging unto Punishment Neither can these things be otherwise neither can any Man living not the worst of Men chuse but judge himself whilest he is in this World obliged to give Obedience unto the Law of God according to the notices that he hath of it by the light of nature or otherwise A wicked servant that is punished for his fault if it be with such a punishment as yet continues his Being and his state of servitude is not by his Punishment freed from an Obligation unto Duty according unto the Rule of it Yea his Obligation unto Duty with respect unto that crime for which he was punished is not dissolved until his punishment be capital and so put an end unto his state Wherefore seeing that by the pardon of sin we are freed only from the Obligation unto Punishment there is moreover required unto our Justification an Obedience unto what the Law requireth And this greatly strengthneth the Argument in whose Vindication we are ingaged for we being sinners we were obnoxious both unto the Command and Curse of the Law Both must be answered or we cannot be justified And as the Lord Christ could not by his most perfect Obedience satisfie the Curse of the Law dying thou shalt die so by the utmost of his suffering he could not fulfil the command of the Law Do this and live Passion as Passion is not Obedience though there may be Obedience in suffering as there was in that of Christ unto the height Wherefore as we plead that the Death of Christ is imputed unto us for our Justification so we deny that it is imputed unto us for our Righteousness For by the Imputation of the Sufferings of Christ our sins are remitted or pardoned and we are delivered from the Curse of the Law which he underwent But we are not thence esteemed just or righteous which we cannot be without respect unto the fulfilling of the Commands of the Law or the Obedience by it required The whole matter is excellently expressed by Grotius in the words before alledged Cum duo nobis peperisse Christum dixerimus impunitatem praemium illud satisfactioni hoc merito Christi distincte tribuit vetus Ecclesia Satisfactio consistit in meritorum translatione meritum in perfectissimae obedientiae pro nobis praestitae imputatione 3. The Objection mentioned proceeds also on this Supposition That pardon of sin gives title unto Eternal Blessedness in the injoyment of God For Justification doth so and according to the Authors of this opinion no other Righteousness is required thereunto but pardon of sin That Justification doth give Right and Title unto Adoption Acceptation with God and the Heavenly Inheritance I suppose will not be denied and it hath been proved already Pardon of sin depends solely on the death or suffering of Christ In whom we have Redemption through his Blood the forgiveness of sins according to the riches of his Grace Ephes. 1.7 But suffering for Punishment gives Right and Title unto nothing only satisfies for something nor doth it deserve any Reward It is no where said Suffer this and live but Do this and live These things I confess are inseparably connected in the Ordinance Appointment and Covenant of God Whosoever hath his sins pardoned is accepted with God hath Right unto Eternal Blessedness These things are inseparable but they are not one and the same And by reason of their inseparable Relation are they so put together by the Apostle Rom. 4.6 7 8. Even as David also describeth the Blessedness of the Man unto whom God imputeth Righteousness without Works Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven and whose sins are covered Blessed is the Man unto whom the Lord will not impute sin It is the Imputation of Righteousness that gives Right unto Blessedness but pardon of sin is inseparable from it and an effect of it both being opposed unto Justification by Works or an Internal Righteousness of our own But it is one thing to be freed from being liable unto Eternal Death and another to have Right and Title unto a Blessed and Eternal Life It is one thing to be redeemed from under the Law that is the Curse of it another to receive the Adoption of Sons One thing to be freed from the Curse another to have the Blessing of Abraham come upon us as the Apostle distinguisheth these things Gal. 3.13 14. 4.4 5 And so doth our Lord Jesus Christ Acts 26.18 That they may receive forgiveness of sins and inheritance a Lot and Right to the Inheritance amongst them that are sanctified by Faith that is in me 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we have by Faith in Christ is only a dismission of sin from being pleadable unto our condemnation on which account there is no condemnation unto them that are in Christ Jesus But a Right and Title unto Glory or the Heavenly Inheritance it giveth not Can it be supposed that all the great and glorious effects of present Grace and future Blessedness should follow necessarily on and be the effect of meer pardon of sin Can we not be pardoned but we must thereby of necessity be made Sons Heirs of God and Coheirs with Christ Pardon of sin is in God with respect unto the sinner a free gratuitous Act Forgiveness of sin through the riches of his Grace But with respect unto the satisfaction of Christ it is an Act in Judgment For on the consideration thereof as imputed unto him doth God absolve and
application of them unto all that do believe which may be justly pleaded unto the same purpose with those passages of the Context which we have insisted on But if every Testimony should be pleaded which the Holy Ghost hath given unto this Truth there would be no end of writing One thing more I shall observe and put an end unto our discourse on this Chapter Vers. 6 7 8. The Apostle pursues his Argument to prove the freedom of our Justification by Faith without respect unto Works through the Imputation of Righteousness in the instance of pardon of Sin which essentially belongeth thereunto And this he doth by the Testimony of the Psalmist who placeth the blessedness of a man in the Remission of Sins His design is not thereby to declare the full nature of Justification which he had done before but only to prove the freedom of it from any respect unto Works in the instance of that essential part of it Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man unto whom God imputeth Righteousness without Works which was the only thing he designed to prove by this Testimony saying Blessed are they whose Iniquities are forgiven He describes their blessedness by it not that their whole blessedness doth consist therein but this concurs unto it wherein no respect can possibly be had unto any Works whatever And he may justly from hence describe the blessedness of a man in that the Imputation of Righteousness and the Non-Tmputation of Sin both which the Apostle mentioneth distinctly wherein his whole blessedness as unto justification doth consist are inseparable And because Remission of Sin is the first part of Justification and the principal part of it and hath the Imputation of Righteousness always accompanying it the blessedness of a man may be well described thereby Yea whereas all Spiritual Blessings go together in Christ Eph. 1.3 A mans blessedness may be described by any of them But yet the Imputation of Righteousness and the Remission of Sin are not the same no more than Righteousness imputed and Sin remitted are the same Nor doth the Apostle propose them as the same but mentioneth them distinctly both being equally necessary unto our compleat Justification as hath been proved Chap. 5. Vers. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21. Wherefore as by one man Sin entred into the world and death by Sin and so death passed upon all men for that all have sinned For until the Law Sin was in the world But Sin is not imputed when there is no Law Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adams transgression who is the figure of him that was to come But not as the offence so also is the free gift For if through the offence of one many be dead much more the grace of God and the gift by Grace which is by one man Jesus Christ hath abounded unto many And not as it was by one that sinned so is the gift For the Judgment was by one to condemnation but the free gift is of many offences unto Justification For if by one mans offence death reigned by one much more they which receive abundance of Grace and of the gift of Righteousness shall reign in life by one Jesus Christ. Therefore as by the offence of one Judgment came upon all men to condemnation Even so by the Righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto Justification of life For as by one mans disobedience many were made Sinners So by the obedience of one shall many be made Righteous Moreover the Law entred that the offence might abound But where Sin abounded Grace did much more abound That as Sin hath reigned unto death even so might Grace reign through Righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord. The Apostle Chap. 3.27 affirms That in this matter of Justification all 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or boasting is excluded But here in the Verse foregoing he grants a boasting or a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And not only so but we also glory in God he excludes boasting in our selves because there is nothing in us to procure or promote our own Justification He allows it us in God because of the eminency and excellency of the way and means of our Justification which in his Grace he hath provided And the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or boasting in God here allowed us hath a peculiar respect unto what the Apostle had in prospect further to discourse of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not only so includes what he had principally treated of before concerning our Justification so far as it consists in the pardon of sin For although he doth suppose yea and mention the imputation of Righteousness also unto us yet principally he declares our Justification by the pardon of sin and our freedom from condemnation whereby all boasting in our selves is excluded But here he designs a further progress as unto that whereon our glorying in God on a right and title freely given us unto eternal life doth depend And this is the Imputation of the Righteousness and Obedience of Christ unto the Justification of life or the reign of Grace through Righteousness unto eternal Life Great complaints have been made by some concerning the obscurity of the discourse of the Apostle in this place by reason of sundry Ellipses Antapodota Hyperbata and other Figures of Speech which either are or are feigned to be therein Howbeit I cannot but think that if Men acquainted with the common principles of Christian Religion and sensible in themselves of the nature and guilt of our original apostasie from God would without prejudice read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this place of the Scripture they will grant that the design of the Apostle is to prove that as the sin of Adam was imputed unto all Men unto condemnation so the Righteousness and Obedience of Christ is imputed unto all that believe unto the Justification of life The sum of it is given by Theodoret Dial. 3. Vide quomodo quae Christi sunt cum iis quae sunt Adami conferantur cum morbo medicina cum vulnere emplastrum cum Peccato justitia cum execratione benedictio cum condemnatione remissio cum transgressione obedientia cum morte vita cum inferis regnum Christus cum Adam homo cum homine The differences that are among Interpreters about the Exposition of these words relate unto the use of some Particles Prepositions and the dependance of one passage upon another on none of which the confirmation of the truth pleaded for doth depend But the plain design of the Apostle and his express Propositions are such as if Men could but acquiesce in them might put an end unto this controversie Socinus acknowledgeth that this place of Scripture doth give as he speaks the greatest occasion unto our opinion in this matter For he cannot deny but at least a great appearance of what we
Justification Rom. 8.33 Isa. 43.25.45.23 Psal. 145.2 Rom. 3.20 What thoughts will be ingenerated hereby in the minds of Men. Isai. 33.14 Mic. 6.7 Isa. 6.5 The Plea of Job against his friends and before God not the same Job 40.3 4 5. Chap. 42.4 5 6. Directions for visiting the sick given of old Testimonies of Jerome and Ambrose Sense of Men in their Prayers Dan. 9.7 18. Psal. 143.2.130.3 4. Paraphrase of Austine on that place Prayer of Pelagius Publick Liturgies Pag. 8. § 3. A due sense of our Apostasie from God the Depravation of our Nature thereby with the power and guilt of Sin the holiness of Law necessary unto a right understanding of the Doctrine of Justification Method of the Apostle to this purpose Romans 1 2 3 4. Chap. Grounds of the antient and present Pelagianism in the denial of these things Instances thereof Boasting of Perfection from the same Ground Knowledge of Sin and Grace mutually promote each other Pag. 18. § 4. Opposition between Works and Grace as unto Justification Method of the Apostle in the Epistle to the Romans to manifest this opposition A Scheam of others contrary thereunto Testimonies witnessing this opposition Judgment to be made on them Distinctions whereby they are evaded The uselessness of them Resolution of the case in hand by Bellarmine Luk. 17.10 Dan. 9.18 Pag. 24. § 5. A Commutation as unto Sin and Righteousness by Imputation between Christ and Believers represented in the Scripture The Ordinance of the Scape Goat Levit. 16.21 22. The nature of Expiatory Sacrifices Levit. 4.29 Expiation of an uncertain Murther Deut. 21.1 2 3 4 5 6 7. The Commutation intended proved and vindicated Isa. 53.5 6. 2 Cor. 5.21 Rom. 8.3 4. Gal. 3.13 14. 1 Pet. 1.24 Deut. 21.23 Testimonies of Justin Martyr Gregory Nissen Austine Chrysostome Bernard Taulerus Pighius to that purpose The proper actings of Faith with respect thereunto Rom. 5.11 Matth. 11.28 Psa. 38.4 Gen. 4.13 Isa. 53.11 Gal. 3.1 Isa. 45.22 Joh. 3.14 15. A bold Calumny answered Pag. 38 39. § 6. Introduction of Grace by Jesus Christ into the whole of our Relation unto God and its respect unto all the parts of our Obedience No Mystery of Grace in the Covenant of Works All Religion originally commensurate unto Reason No notions of Natural Light concerning the Introduction of the Mediation of Christ and Mystery of Grace into our Relation to God Eph. 1.17 18 19. Reason as corrupted can have no notions of Religion but what are derived from its primitive state Hence the Mysteries of the Gospel esteemed folly Reason as corrupted repugnant unto the Mystery of Gâ—â—â—e Accommodation of Spiritual Mysteries unto Corrupt Reason wherefore acceptable unto many Reasons of it Two parts of corrupted Natures repugnancy unto the Mystery of the Gospel 1. That which would reduce it unto the private Reason of Men. Thence the Trinity denied And the Incarnation of the Son of God Without which the Doctrine of Justification cannot stand Rule of the Socinians in the Interpretation of the Scripture 2. Want of a due comprehension of the Harmony that is between all the parts of the Mystery of Grace This Harmomy proved Compared with the Harmony in the Works of Nature To be studied But is learned only of them who are taught of God and in experience Evil events of the want of a due comprehension hereof Instances of them All applied unto the Doctrine of Justification Pag. 53. § 7. General prejudices against the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. 1. That it is not in Terms found in the Scripture answered 2. That nothing is said of it in the writings of the Evangelists answered Joh. 20.30 31. Nature of Christs Personal Ministery Revelations by the holy Spirit immediately from Christ. Design of the writings of the Evangelists 3. Differences among Protestants themselves about this Doctrine answered Sense of the Antients herein What is of real Difference among Protestants considered Pag. 69. § 8. Influence of the Doctrine of Justification into the first Reformation Advantages unto the World by that Reformation State of the Consciences of Men under the Papacy with respect unto Justification before God Alterations made therein by the Light of this Doctrine though not received Alterations in the Pagan unbelieving World by the Introduction of Christianity Design and success of the first Reformer herein Attempts for Reconciliation with the Papists in this Doctrine and their success Remainders of the â—gnorance of the Truth in the Roman Church Vnavoidable consequences of the corruption of this Doctrine Pag. 83. CHAP. I. JVstification by Faith generally acknowledged The meaning of it perverted The nature and use of Faith in Justification proposed to consideration Distinctions about it waved A twofold Faith of the Gospel expressed in the Scripture Faith that is not justifying Acts 8.13 Joh. 2.23 24. Luk. 8.13 Matth. 22.28 Historical Faith whence it is so called and the nature of it Degrees of Assent in it Justification not ascribed unto any Degree of it A Calumny obviated The causes of true saving Faith Conviction of Sin previous unto it The nature of legal Conviction and its Effects Arguments to prove it antecedent unto Faith Without the consideration of it the true nature of Faith not to be understood The Order and Relation of the Law and Gospel Rom. 1.17 Instance of Adam Effects of Conviction internal Displicency and sorrow Fear of punishment Desire of Deliverance External Abstinence from Sin Performance of Duties Reformation of Life Not conditions of Justification not Formal Dispositions unto it not Moral Preparations for it The Order of God in Justification The proper object of justifying Faith Not all Divine Verity equally proved by sundry Arguments The pardon of our own sins whether the first object of Faith The Lord Christ in the Work of Mediation as the Ordinance of God for the Recovery of lost Sinners the proper object of justifying Faith The Position explained and proved Rom. 3.24 25. Ephes. 1.6 7 8. Acts 10.41 Chap. 16.13 Chap. 4.12 Luk. 24.25 26 27. Joh. 1.12.3.16 36.6.29.7.38 c. Col. 2.12 1 Cor. 2.1 31. 2 Cor. 5.19 20 21. Pag. 92 93 c. CHAP. II. The nature of justifying Faith in particular or of Faith in that exercise of it whereby we are justified The Hearts approbation of the way of the Justification and Salvation of Sinners by Christ with its acquiescency therein The description given explained and confirmed 1. From the nature of the Gospel 2. Exemplified in its contrary or the nature of unbelief Prov. 1.30 Heb. 2.3 1 Pet. 2.7 1 Cor. 1.23 24. 2 Cor. 4.3 4. What it is and wherein it doth consist 3. The Design of God in and by the Gospel His own Glory his utmost End in all things The Glory of his Righteousness Grace Love Wisdom c. The end of God in the Way of the Salvation of Sinners by Christ. Rom. 3.25 Joh. 3.16 1 Joh. 3.16 Eph. 1.5 6. 1 Cor. 1.24 Ephes. 3.10 Rom. 1.16.4.16 Ephes.
head 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and he shall give them all to be on the head of the Goat in answer whereunto it is said that he bare them all upon him This he did by virtue of the divine Institution wherein was a ratification of what was done He did not transfuse sin from one subject into another but transferred the Guilt of it from one to another And to evidence this Translation of sin from the People unto the Sacrifice in his confession he put and fixed both his hands on his head Thence the Jews say that all Israel was made as innocent on the day of Expiation as they were in the day of Creation From ver 30. Wherein they came short of perfection or consummation thereby the Apostle declares Heb. 10. But this is the language of every Expiatory Sacrifice quod in ejus caput sit let the Guilt be on him Hence the Sacrifice it self was called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sin and Guilt Levit. 4.29.7.2.10.17 And therefore where there was an uncertain Murther and none could be found that was liable to punishment thereon that Guilt might not come upon the Land nor the Sin be imputed unto the whole People an Heifer was to be slain by the Elders of the City that was next unto the place where the Murder was committed to take away the Guilt of it Deut. 21.1 2 3 4 5 6 7. But whereas this was only a moral Representation of the punishment due to Guilt and no Sacrifice the Guilty person being not known those who slew the Heifer did not put their hands on him so to transfer their own guilt to him but washed their hands over him to declare their personal innocency By these means as in all other Expiatory Sacrifices did God instruct the Church in the transferring of the Guilt of sin unto him who was to bear all their Iniquities with their Discharge and Justification thereby So God laid on Christ the Iniquities of us all that by his Stripes we might be healed Isa. 53.5 6. Our Iniquity was laid on him and he bare it ver 11. and through his bearing of it we are freed from it His Stripes are our healing our sin was his imputed unto him his merit is ours imputed unto us He was made sin for us who knew no sin that we might become the Righteousness of God in him 2 Cor. 5.21 This is that Commutation I mentioned He was made sin for us we are made the Righteousness of God in him God not imputing sin unto us ver 19. but imputing Righteousness unto us doth it on this Ground alone That he was made sin for us And if by his being made sin only his being made a Sacrifice for sin is intended it is to the same purpose For the formal Reason of any thing being made an Expiatory Sacrifice was the Imputation of sin unto it by Divine Institution The same is expressed by the same Apostle Rom. 8.3 4. God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin condemned sin in the flesh that the Righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us The sin was made his he answered for it and the Righteousness which God requireth by the Law is made ours The Righteousness of the Law is fulfilled in us not by our doing it but by his This is that blessed Change and Commutation wherein alone the Soul of a convinced sinner can find rest and peace So he hath redeemed us from the Curse of the Law being made a Curse for us that the blessing of faithful Abraham might come upon us Gal. 3.13 14. The Curse of the Law contained all that was due to sin this belonged unto us But it was transferred on him He was made a Curse whereof his hanging on a Tree was the sign and token Hence he is said to bear all our sins in his own Body upon the Tree 1 Pet. 1.24 because his hanging on the Tree was the token of his bearing the Curse For he that is hanged on the Tree is the Curse of God Deut. 21.23 And in the blessing of Faithful Abraham all Righteousness and Acceptation with God is included for Abraham believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness But because some who for Reasons best known unto themselves do take all occasions to except against my Writings have in particular raised an impertinent clamour about somewhat that I formerly delivered to this purpose I shall declare the whole of my Judgment herein in the words of some of those whom they can pretend no quarrel against that I know of The excellent words of Justin Martyr deserve the first place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epist. ad Diognet He gave his Son a Ransome for us the Holy for Transgressors the Innocent for the nocent the Just for the unjust the Incorruptible for the corrupt the Immortal for mortals For what else could hide or cover our sins but his Righteousness in whom else could we wicked and ungodly ones be justified or esteemed Righteous but in the Son of God alone O SWEET PERMVTATION or Change O unsearchable Work or curious Operation O Blessed Beneficence exceeding all Expectation That the Iniquity of many should be hid in one Just one and the Righteousness of One should justifie many Transgressors And Gregory Nysson speaks to the same purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Orat. 2. in Cant. He hath transferred unto himself the filth of my sins and communicated unto me his purity and made me partaker of his Beauty So Augustine also Ipse peccatum ut nos justitia nec nostra sed Dei nec in nobis sed in ipso sicut ipse peccatum non suum sed nostrum nec in se sed in nobis constitutum Enchirid. ad Laurent cap. 41. He was Sin that we might be Righteousness not our own but the Righteousness of God not in our selves but in him As he was Sin not his own but ours not in himself but in us The old Latine Translation rendring those words Psal. 22.1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Verba delictorum meorum He thus comments on the place Quomodo ergo dicit delictorum meorum nisi quia pro delictis nostris ipse precatur delicta nostra delicta sua fecit ut justitiam suam nostram justitiam faceret How saith he of my Sins because he prayeth for our Sins He made our Sins to be his that he might make his Righteousness to be ours 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 O sweet Commutation and Change And Chrysostom to the same purpose on those words of the Apostle That we might be made the Righteousness of God in him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in 2 Epist. ad Corinth cap. 5. Hom. 11. What word what speech is this what mind can comprehend or express it For he saith he made him who was Righteous to be made a Sinner that he might make sinners Righteous nor yet doth he say so neither but that
his Priestly Office And therefore is Justification either expresly or virtually assigned unto them also Gen. 3.15 1 Joh. 3.8 Heb. 2.13 14 15 16. Rom. 4.25 Act. 5.31 Heb. 7.27 Rom. 8.34 But yet wherever our Justification is so assigned unto them they are not absolutely considered but with respect unto their relation to his Sacrifice and Satisfaction 3 All the means of the Application of the Sacrifice and Righteousness of the Lord Christ unto us are also included therein Such is the principal Efficient cause thereof which is the Holy Ghost whence we are said to be justified in the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God 1 Cor. 6.11 and the instrumental cause thereof on the part of God which is the Promise of the Gospel Rom. 1.17 Gal. 3.22 23. It would therefore be unduly pretended that by this Assertion we do narrow or straiten the Object of Justifying Faith as it Justifies For indeed we assign a respect unto the whole Mediatory Office of Christ not excluding the Kingly and Prophetical parts thereof but only such a notion of them as would not bring in more of Christ but much of our selves into our Justification And the Assertion as laid down may be proved 1. From the Experience of all that are justified or do seek for Justification according unto the Gospel For under this notion of seeking for Justification or a Righteousness unto Justification they were all of them to be considered and do consider themselves as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 guilty before God subject obnoxious liable unto his wrath in the curse of the Law as we declared in the Entrance of this Discourse Rom. 3.19 They were all in the same state that Adam was in after the Fall unto whom God proposed the Relief of the Incarnation and Suffering of Christ Gen. 3.15 And to seek after Justification is to seek after a discharge from this woful state and condition Such persons have and ought to have other designs and desires also For whereas the state wherein they are antecedent unto their Justification is not only a state of Guilt and Wrath but such also as wherein through the Depravation of their Nature the power of sin is prevalent in them and their whole Souls are defiled they design and desire not only to be justified but to be sanctified also But as unto the Guilt of sin and the want of a Righteousness before God from which Justification is their Relief herein I say they have respect unto Christ as set forth to be a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood In their Design for Sanctification they have respect unto the Kingly and Prophetical Offices of Christ in their especial exercise But as to their freedom from the Guilt of sin and their Acceptance with God or their Justification in his sight that they may be freed from condemnation that they may not come into judgment it is Christ crucified it is Christ lifted up as the brazen Serpent in the Wilderness it is the Blood of Christ it is the Propitiation that he was and the Atonement that he made it is his bearing their sins his being made sin and the curse for them it is his Obedience the End which he put unto sin and the Everlasting Righteousness which he brought in that alone their Faith doth fix upon and acquiesce in If it be otherwise in the Experience of any I acknowledge I am not acquainted with it I do not say that Conviction of sin is the only antecedent Condition of actual Justification But this it is that makes a sinner subjectum capax Justificationis No man therefore is to be considered as a person to be Justified but he who is actually under the power of the Conviction of sin with all the necessary consequents thereof Suppose therefore any sinner in this Condition as it is described by the Apostle Rom. 3. Guilty before God with his mouth stopped as unto any pleas defences or excuses suppose him to seek after a Relief and Deliverance out of this estate that is to be justified according to the Gospel he neither doth nor can wisely take any other course than what he is there directed unto by the same Apostle ver 20 21 22 23 24 25. Therefore by the Deeds of the Law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight for by the Law is the knowledge of sin But now the Righteousness of God without the Law is manifested being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets Even the Righteousness of God which is by Faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe for there is no difference For all have sinned and come short of the Glory of God Being justified freely by his Grace through the Redemption that is in Jesus Christ whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through Faith in his Blood to declare his Righteousness for the remission of sins that are past through the forbearance of God Whence I argue That which a Guilty condemned sinner finding no hope nor Relief from the Law of God the sole Rule of all his Obedience doth betake himself unto by Faith that he may be delivered or justified that is the especial Object of Faith as Justifying But this is the Grace of God alone through the Redemption that is in Christ or Christ proposed as a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood Either this is so or the Apostle doth not aright guide the Souls and Consciences of men in that condition wherein he himself doth place them It is the Blood of Christ alone that he directs the Faith unto of all them that would be justified before God Grace Redemption Propitiation all through the Blood of Christ Faith doth peculiarly respect and fix upon This is that if I mistake not which they will confirm by their Experience who have made any distinct observation of the actings of their Faith in their Justification before God 2. The Scripture plainly declares that Faith as Justifying respects the sacerdotal Office and Actings of Christ alone In the great Representation of the Justification of the Church of Old in the Expiatory Sacrifice when all their sins and iniquities were pardoned and their persons accepted with God the acting of their Faith was limited unto the Imposition of all their sins on the head of the Sacrifice by the high Priest Lev. 16. By his knowledge that is Faith in him shall my righteous Servant justifie many for he shall bear their iniquities Isa. 53.11 That alone which Faith respects in Christ as unto the Justification of sinners is his bearing their iniquities Guilty convinced sinners look unto him by Faith as those who were stung with fiery Serpents did to the Brazen Serpent that is as he was lifted up on the Cross Joh. 3.14 15. So did he himself express the nature and actings of Faith in our Justification Rom. 3.24 25. Being justified freely by his Grace through the Redemption that is in Jesus Christ whom God hath set
1 All our sins past present and to come were at once imputed unto and laid upon Jesus Christ in what sense we shall afterwards enquire He was wounded for our Transgressions He was bruised for our Iniquities the chastisement of our peace was upon him and with his stripes are we healed All we like Sheep have gone astray we have turned every one to his own way and the Lord hath made to meet on Him the Iniquities of us all Isa. 53.6 7. Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the Tree 1 Pet. 2.24 The Assertions being indefinite without exception or limitation are equivalent unto Vniversals All our sins were on him he bare them All at once and therefore once died for all 2 He did therefore at once finish Transgression made an End of sin made Reconciliation for Iniquity and brought in everlasting Righteousness Dan. 9.24 At once he expiated all our sins for by himself he purged our sins and then sate down at the right hand of the Majesty on high Heb. 1.3 And we are sanctified or dedicated unto God through the offering of the Body of Christ once for all for by one Offering he hath perfected consummated compleated as unto their spiritual state them that are sanctified Heb. 10.10.14 He never will do more than he hath actually done already for the Expiation of all our sins from first to last for there remaineth no more sacrifice for sin I do not say that hereupon our Justification is compleat but only that the meritorious procuring cause of it was at once compleated and is never to be renewed or repeated any more All the enquiry is concerning the renewed Application of it unto our Souls and Consciences whether that be by Faith alone or by the works of Righteousness which we do 3 By our actual Believing with Justifying Faith believing on Christ or his Name we do receive him and thereby on our first Justification become the Sons of God Joh. 1.12 That is joynt heirs with Christ and heirs of God Rom. 8.17 Hereby we have a Right unto and an Interest in all the Benefits of his Mediation which is to be at once compleatly justified For in him we are compleat Col. 2.10 For by the Faith that is in him we do receive the forgiveness of sins and a lot or inheritance among all them that are sanctified Act. 26.18 being immediately justified from all things from which we could not be justified by the Law Act. 13.39 yea God thereon blesseth us with all spiritual Blessings in heavenly things in Christ Ephes. 1.3 All these things are absolutely inseparable from our first believing in him and therefore our Justification is at once compleat In particular 4 On our Believing all our sins are forgiven He hath quickened you together with him having forgiven you all Trespasses Col. 2.13 14 15. For in him we have Redemption through his Blood even the forgiveness of sins according unto the riches of his Grace Ephes. 1.7 which one place obviates all the petulant exceptions of some against the consistency of the free Grace of God in the pardon of sins and the satisfaction of Christ in the procurement thereof 5 There is hereon nothing to be laid unto the charge of them that are so justified For he that believeth hath Everlasting Life and shall not come into Condemnation but is passed from Death unto Life Joh. 5.24 And who shall lay any thing unto the charge of Gods Elect it is God that Justifieth it is Christ that died Rom. 8.33 34. and there is no condemnation unto them that are in Christ Jesus ver 1. For being justified by Faith we have peace with God chap. 5.1 And 6 we have that Blessedness hereon whereof in this life we are capable Rom. 4.5 6. From all which it appears that our Justification is at once compleat And 7 it must be so or no man can be justified in this world For no time can be assigned nor measure of Obedience be limited whereon it may be supposed that any one comes to be Justified before God who is not so on his first Believing For the Scripture doth no where assign any such time or measure And to say that no man is compleatly justified in the sight of God in this life is at once to overthrow all that is taught in the Scriptures concerning Justification and therewithall all peace with God and comfort of Believers But a man acquitted upon his legal trial is at once discharged of all that the Law hath against him 2. Upon this compleat Justification Believers are obliged unto universal Obedience unto God The Law is not abolished but established by Faith It is neither abrogated nor dispensed withall by such an Interpretation as should take off its obligation in any thing that it requires nor as to the degree and manner wherein it requires it Nor is it possible it should be so For it is nothing but the Rule of that Obedience which the nature of God and man make necessary from the one to the other And that is an Antinomianism of the worst sort and most derogatory unto the Law of God which affirms it to be divested of its power to oblige unto perfect Obedience so as that what it is not so shall as it were in despight of the Law be accepted as if it were so unto the End for which the Law requires it There is no medium but that either the Law is utterly abolished and so there is no sin for where there is no Law there is no Transgression or it must be allowed to require the same Obedience that it did at its first Institution and unto the same degree Neither is it in the power of any man living to keep his Conscience from judging and condemning that whatever it be wherein he is convinced that he comes short of the perfection of the Law Wherefore 3. The Commanding Power of the Law in positive precepts and prohibitions which Justified Persons are subject unto doth make and constitute all their inconformities unto it to be no less truly and properly sins in their own nature than they would be if their persons were obnoxious unto the Curse of it This they are not nor can be for to be obnoxious unto the Curse of the Law and to be justified are contradictory but to be subject to the Commands of the Law and to be justified are not so But it is a subjection to the commanding power of the Law and not an obnoxiousness unto the Curse of the Law that constitutes the nature of sin in its Transgression Wherefore that compleat Justification which is at once though it dissolve the Obligation on the sinner unto punishment by the Curse of the Law yet doth it not annihilate the commanding Authority of the Law unto them that are justified that what is sin in others should not be so in them See Rom. 8.1.33 34. Hence in the first Justification of believing sinners all future sins are remitted as unto
afterwards to denote their state who were committed unto custody in order unto their Trial when the Government ceased to be popular wherein alone the other Artifice was of use And if this word be of any use in our present Argument it is to express the state of men after Conviction of sin before their Justification That is their Reatus the condition wherein the proudest of them cannot avoid to express their inward sorrow and anxiety of mind by some outward evidences of them Beyond this we are not obliged by the use of this word but must consider the thing it self which now we intend to express thereby Guilt in the Scripture is the Respect of sin unto the sanction of the Law whereby the sinner becomes obnoxious unto punishment And to be guilty is to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 liable unto punishment for sin from God as the supreme Lawgiver and Judge of all And so guilt or Reatus is well defined to be obligatio ad poenam propter culpam aut admissam in se aut imputatam juste aut injuste For so Bathsheba says unto David that she and her Son Solomon should be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sinners that is be esteemed guilty or liable unto punishment for some evil laid unto their charge 1 Kings 1.21 And the distinction of Dignitas poenae and obligatio ad poenam is but the same thing in divers words For both do but express the Relation of sin unto the sanction of the Law or if they may be conceived to differ yet are they inseparable for there can be no obligatio ad poenam where there is not dignitas poenae Much less is there any thing of weight in the distinction of Reatus culpae and Reatus poenae For this Reatus culpae is nothing but dignitas poenae propter culpam Sin hath other considerations namely its formal nature as it is a Transgression of the Law and the stain or filth that it brings upon the Soul but the guilt of it is nothing but its respect unto punishment from the sanction of the Law And so indeed Reatus culpae is Reatus poenae the guilt of sin is its desert of punishment And where there is not this Reatus culpae there can be no poena no punishment properly so called For poena is vindicta noxae the revenge due to sin So therefore there can be no punishment nor Reatus poenae the guilt of it but where there is Reatus culpae or sin considered with its guilt And the Reatus poenae that may be supposed without the guilt of sin is nothing but that obnoxiousness unto afflictive evil on the occasion of sin which the Socinians admit with respect unto the suffering of Christ and yet execrate his satisfaction And if this distinction should be apprehended to be of Reatus from its formal respect unto sin and punishment it must in both parts of the Distinction be of the same signification otherwise there is an equivocation in the subject of it But reatus poenae is a liableness an obnoxiousness unto punishment according to the sentence of the Law that whereby a sinner becomes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And then Reatus culpae must be an obnoxiousness unto sin which is uncouth There is therefore no Imputation of sin where there is no Imputation of its Guilt For the Guilt of Punishment which is not its respect unto the desert of sin is a plain fiction there is no such thing in rerum natura There is no Guilt of sin but its Relation unto Punishment That therefore which we affirm herein is That our sins were so transferred on Christ as that thereby he became 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Reus responsible unto God and obnoxious unto punishment in the justice of God for them He was alienae culpae reus Perfectly innocent in himself but took our Guilt on him or our obnoxiousness unto punishment for sin And so he may be and may be said to be the greatest Debtor in the World who never borrowed nor owed one farthing on his own account if he become surety for the greatest Debt of others So Paul became a Debtor unto Philemon upon his undertaking for Onesimus who before owed him nothing And two things concurred unto this Imputation of sin unto Christ. 1 The Act of God imputing it 2 The voluntary Act of Christ himself in the undertaking of it or admitting of the charge 1. The Act of God in this Imputation of the Guilt of our sins unto Christ is expressed by his laying all our Iniquities upon him making him to be sin for us who knew no sin and the like For 1 as the supream Governour Law-giver and Judge of all unto whom it belonged to take care that his holy Law was observed or the offenders punished He admitted upon the Transgression of it the sponsion and suretiship of Christ to answer for the sins of men Heb. 10.5 6 7. 2 In order unto this End he made him under the Law or gave the Law power over him to demand of him and inflict on him the penalty which was due unto the sins of them for whom he undertook Gal. 3.13 chap. 4.4 5. 3 For the Declaration of the Righteousness of God in this setting forth of Christ to be a Propitiation and to bear our Iniquities the Guilt of our sins was transferred unto him in an Act of the Righteous Judgment of God accepting and esteeming of him as the Guilty person as it is with publick sureties in every case 2. The Lord Christ voluntary susception of the state and condition of a surety or undertaker for the Church to appear before the Throne of Gods Justice for them to answer whatever was laid unto their charge was required hereunto And this he did absolutely There was a concurrence of his own Will in and unto all those Divine Acts whereby he and the Church were constituted one mystical person And of his own Love and Grace did he as our surety stand in our stead before God where he made Inquisition for sin He took it on himself as unto the punishment which it deserved Hence it became just and righteous that he should suffer the just for the unjust that he might bring us unto God For if this be not so I desire to know what is become of the Guilt of the sins of Believers If it were not transferred on Christ it remains still upon themselves or it is nothing It will be said that Guilt is taken away by the free pardon of sin But if so there was no need of punishment for it at all which is indeed what the Socinians plead but by others is not admitted For if punishment be not for Guilt it is not punishment But it is fiercely objected against what we have asserted that if the Guilt of our sins was imputed unto Christ then was he constituted a sinner thereby for it is the Guilt of sin that makes any one to be truly a sinner This is urged by Bellarmin
lib. 2. de Justificat not for its own sake but to disprove the Imputation of his Righteousness unto us as it is continued by others with the same design For saith he if we be made Righteous and the Children of God through the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ then was he made a sinner quod horret animus cogitare filius Diaboli by the Imputation of the Guilt of our sins or our Vnrighteousness unto him And the same Objection is pressed by others with instances of consequences which for many Reasons I heartily wish had been forborn But I answer 1. Nothing is more absolutely true nothing is more sacredly or assuredly believed by us then that nothing which Christ did or suffered nothing that he undertook or underwent did or could constitute him subjectively inherently and thereon personally a sinner or guilty of any sin of his own To bear the Guilt or Blame of other mens faults to be alienae culpae reus makes no man a sinner unless he did unwisely or irregularly undertake it But that Christ should admit of any thing of sin in himself as it is absolutely inconsistent with the Hypostatical Vnion so it would render him unmeet for all other Duties of his Office Heb. 7.25 26. And confess it hath always seemed scandalous unto me that Socinus Crellius and Grotius do grant that in some sense Christ suffered for his own sins and would prove it from that very place wherein it is positively denied Heb. 7.27 This ought to be sacredly fixed and not a word used nor thought entertained of any possibility of the contrary upon any supposition whatever 2. None ever dreamed of a Transfusion or propagation of sin from us unto Christ such as there was from Adam unto us For Adam was a common person unto us we are not so to Christ yea he is so to us and the Imputation of our sins unto him as a singular Act of Divine Dispensation which no evil consequent can ensue upon 3. To imagine such an Imputation of our sins unto Christ as that thereon they should cease to be our sins and become his absolutely is to overthrow that which is affirmed For on that supposition Christ would not suffer for our sins for they ceased to be ours antecedently unto his suffering But the Guilt of them was so transferred unto him that through his suffering for it it might be pardoned unto us These things being premised I say 1. There is in sin a Transgression of the Preceptive part of the Law and there is an obnoxiousness unto the Punishment from the Sanction of it It is the first that gives sin its formal nature and where that is not subjectively no person can be constituted formally a sinner However any one may be so denominated as unto some certain end or purpose yet without this formally a sinner none can be whatever be imputed unto them And where that is no non-imputation of sin as unto punishment can free the person in whom it is from being formally a sinner When Bathsheba told David that she and her Son Solomon should be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sinners by having crimes laid unto their charge and when Judah told Jacob that he would be a sinner before him always on the account of any evil that befell Benjamin it should be imputed unto him yet neither of them could thereby be constituted a sinner formally And on the other hand when Shimei desired David not to impute sin unto him whereby he escaped present punishment yet did not that non-imputation free him formally from being a sinner Wherefore sin under this consideration as a Transgression of the Preceptive part of the Law cannot be communicated from one unto another unless it be by the propagation of a vitiated Principle or Habit. But yet neither so will the personal sin of one as inherent in him ever come to be the personal sin of another Adam hath upon his personal sin communicated a vitious depraved and corrupted nature unto all his Posterity and besides the guilt of his actual sin is imputed unto them as if it had been committed by every one of them But yet his particular personal sin neither ever did nor ever could become the personal sin of any one of them any otherwise than by the Imputation of its guilt unto them Wherefore our sins neither are nor can be so imputed unto Christ as that they should become subjectively his as they are a Transgression of the Preceptive part of the Law A Physical Translation or Transfusion of sin is in this case naturally and spiritually impossible and yet on a supposition thereof alone do the horrid consequences mentioned depend But the guilt of sin is an external respect of it with regard unto the sanction of the Law only This is separable from sin and if it were not so no one sinner could either be pardoned or saved It may therefore be made anothers by Imputation and yet that other not rendered formally a sinner thereby This was that which was imputed unto Christ whereby he was rendred obnoxious unto the Curse of the Law For it was impossible that the Law should pronounce any accursed but the guilty nor would do so Deut. 27.26 2. There is a great difference between the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto us and the Imputation of our sins unto Christ so as that he cannot in the same manner be said to be made a sinner by the one as we are made Righteous by the other For our sin was imputed unto Christ only as he was our Surety for a time to this end that he might take it away destroy it and abolish it It was never imputed unto him so as to make any alteration absolutely in his personal state and condition But his Righteousness is imputed unto us to abide with us to be ours always and to make a total change in our state and condition as unto our Relation unto God Our sin was imputed unto him only for a season not absolutely but as he was a Surety and unto the special end of destroying it and taken on him on this condition that his Righteousness should be made ours for ever All things are otherwise in the Imputation of his Righteousness unto us which respects us absolutely and not under a temporary capacity abides with us for ever changeth our state and relation unto God and is an effect of super-abounding Grace But it will be said that if our sins as to the guilt of them were imputed unto Christ then God must hate Christ. For he hateth the guilty I know not well how I come to mention these things which indeed I look upon as cavils such as men may multiply if they please against any part of the mysteries of the Gospel But seeing it is mentioned it may be spoken unto And 1. It is certain that the Lord Christ's taking on him the guilt of our sins was an high act of Obedience unto God Heb. 10.5 6.
essence of it whereunto alone respect is had in this Law by any thing that can fall out And although God might superadd unto the original Obligations of this Law what Arbitrary commands he pleased such as did not necessarily proceed or arise from the Relation between him and us which might be and be continued without them yet would they be resolved into that Principle of this Law that God in all things was absolutely to be trusted and obeyed 7. Known unto God are all his Works from the foundation of the World In the constitution of this order of things he made it possible and foresaw it would be future that man would rebell against the preceptive power of this Law and disturb that order of things wherein he was placed under his moral Rule This gave occasion unto that effect of infinite Divine Righteousness in constituting the punishment that man should fall under upon his Transgression of this Law Neither was this an effect of Arbitrary will and pleasure any more than the Law it self was Upon the supposition of the Creation of man the Law mentioned was necessary from all the Divine Properties of the nature of God And upon a supposition that man would Transgress that Law God being now considered as his Ruler and Governour the Constitution of the punishment due unto his Sin and Transgression of it was a necessary effect of Divine Righteousness This it would not have been had the Law it self been Arbitrary But that being necessary so was the penalty of this Transgression Wherefore the constitution of this penalty is liable to no more change alteration or abrogation then the Law it self without an alteration in the state and relation between God and man 8. This is that Law which our Lord Jesus Christ came not to destroy but to fulfil that he might be the end of it for Righteousness unto them that do believe This Law he abrogated not nor could do so without a Destruction of the Relation that is between God and man arising from or ensuing necessarily on their distinct Beings and Properties But as this cannot be destroyed so the Lord Christ came unto a contrary end namely to repair and restore it where it was weakned Wherefore 9. This Law the Law of Sinless perfect Obedience with its sentence of the punishment of Death on all Transgressors doth and must abide in force for ever in this World For there is no more required hereunto but that God be God and Man be Man Yet shall this be farther proved 1. There is nothing not one word in the Scripture intimating any alteration in or Abrogation of this Law so as that any thing should not be duty which it makes to be duty or any thing not be sin which it makes to be sin either as unto matter or degrees or that the thing which it makes to be sin or which is sin by the Rule of it should not merit and deserve that punishment which is declared in the sanction of it or threatned by it The wages of sin is Death If any Testimony of Scripture can be produced unto either of these purposes namely that either any thing is not sin in the way of Omission or Commission in the matter or manner of its performance which is made to be so by this Law or that any such sin or any thing that would have been sin by this Law is exempted from the punishment threatned by it as unto merit or desert it shall be attended unto It is therefore in universal force towards all mankind There is no Relief in this case But behold the Lamb of God In exception hereunto it is pleaded that when it was first given unto Adam it was the Rule and Instrument of a Covenant between God and man a Covenant of Works and perfect Obedience But upon the entrance of sin it ceased to have the nature of a Covenant unto any And it is so ceased that on an impossible supposition that any man should fulfil the perfect Righteousness of it yet should he not be justified or obtain the benefit of the Covenant thereby It is not therefore only become ineffectual unto us as a Covenant by reason of our weakness and disability to perform it but it is ceased in its own nature so to be But these things as they are not unto our present purpose so are they wholly unproved For 1. Our Discourse is not about the Foederal adjunct of the Law but about its moral nature only It is enough that as a Law it continueth to oblige all mankind unto perfect Obedience under its Original penalty For hence it will unavoidably follow that unless the commands of it be complied withal and fulfilled the penalty will fall on all that Transgress it And those who grant that this Law is still in force as unto its being a Rule of Obedience or as unto its requiring Duties of us do grant all that we desire For it requires no Obedience but what it did in its Original constitution that is sinless and perfect and it requires no Duty nor prohibits any sin but under the Penalty of Death upon disobedience 2. It is true that he who is once a sinner if he should afterwards yield all that perfect Obedience unto God that the Law requires he could not thereby obtain the Benefit of the Promise of the Covenant But the sole Reason of it is because he is antecedently a sinner and so obnoxious unto the Curse of the Law And no man can be obnoxious unto its Curse and have a right unto its Promise at the same time But so to lay the supposition that the same person is by any means free from the Curse due unto sin and then to deny that upon the performance of that perfect sinless Obedience which the Law requires that he should not have right unto the Promise of Life thereby is to deny the Truth of God and to reflect the highest dishonour upon his Justice Jesus Christ himself was justified by this Law And it is immutably true that he who doth the things of it shall live therein 3. It is granted that man continued not in the Observation of this Law as it was the Rule of the Covenant between God and him The Covenant it was not but the Rule of it which that it should be was superadded unto its Being as a Law For the Covenant comprized things that were not any part of a Result from the necessary Relation of God and Man Wherefore man by his sin as unto Demerit may be said to break this Covenant and as unto any Benefit unto themselves to disannul it It is also true that God did never formally and absolutely renew or give again this Law as a Covenant a second time Nor was there any need that so he should do unless it were declaratively only for so it was renewed at Sinai For the whole of it being an Emanation of Eternal Right and Truth it abides and must abide in full force for
ever Wherefore it is only thus far broke as a Covenant that all Mankind having sinned against the Commands of it and so by Guilt with the Impotency unto Obedience which ensued thereon defeated themselves of any Interest in its Promise and possibility of attaining any such interest they cannot have any Benefit by it But as unto its power to oblige all mankind unto Obedience and the unchangeable Truth of its Promises and Threatnings it abideth the same as it was from the Beginning 2 ly Take away this Law and there is left no standard of Righteousness unto mankind no certain boundaries of Good and Evil but those pillars whereon God hath fixed the Earth are left to move and flote up and down like the Isle of Delos in the Sea Some say the Rule of Good and Evil unto men is not this Law in its original constitution but the Light of Nature and the Dictates of Reason If they mean that Light which was primogenial and concreated with our natures and those Dictates of Right and Wrong which Reason originally suggested and approved they only say in other words that this Law is still the unalterable Rule of Obedience unto all mankind But if they intend the remaining Light of Nature that continues in every individual in this depraved state thereof and that under such additional Depravations as Traditions Customs Prejudices and Lusts of all sorts have affixed unto the most there is nothing more irrational and it is that which is charged with no less inconvenience than that it leaves no certain Boundaries of Good and Evil. That which is Good unto one will on this Ground be in its own nature evil unto another and so on the contrary and all the Idolaters that ever were in the World might on this pretence be excused 3 ly Conscience bears witness hereunto There is no Good nor Evil required or forbidden by this Law that upon the Discovery of it any man in the World can perswade or bribe his Conscience not to comply with it in Judgment as unto his concernment therein It will accuse and excuse condemn and free him according to the sentence of this Law let him do what he can to the contrary In brief it is acknowledged that God by virtue of his supream Dominion over all may in some Instances change the nature and order of things so as the Precepts of the Divine Law shall not in them operate in their ordinary efficacy So was it in the case of his command unto Abraham to slay his Son and unto the Israelites to rob the Aegyptians But on a supposition of the continuance of that order of things which this Law is the preservative of such is the intrinsick nature of the Good and Evil commanded and forbidden therein that it is not the subject of divine Dispensation as even the School-men generally grant 10. From what we have discoursed two things do unavoidably ensue 1. That whereas all mankind have by sin fallen under the Penalty threatned unto the Transgression of this Law and suffering of this Penalty which is Eternal Death being inconsistent with Acceptance before God or the enjoyment of Blessedness it is utterly impossible that any one individual person of the posterity of Adam should be justified in the sight of God accepted with him or blessed by him unless this Penalty be answered undergone and suffered by them or for them the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 herein is not to be abolished but established 2. That unto the same End of Acceptation with God Justification before him and Blessedness from him the Righteousness of this Eternal Law must be fulfilled in us in such a way as that in the Judgment of God which is according unto Truth we may be esteemed to have fulfilled it and be dealt with accordingly For upon a supposition of a failure herein the sanction of the Law is not Arbitrary so as that the Penalty may or may not be inflicted but necessary from the Righteousness of God as the supream Governour of all 11. About the first of these our Controversie is with the Socinians only who deny the satisfaction of Christ and any necessity thereof Concerning this I have treated elsewhere at large and expect not to see an Answer unto what I have disputed on that Subject As unto the latter of them we must enquire how we may be supposed to comply with the Rule and answer the Righteousness of this unalterable Law whose Authority we can no way be exempted from And that which we plead is that the Obedience and Righteousness of Christ imputed unto us His Obedience as the surety of the New Covenant granted unto us made ours by the gracious Constitution Soveraign Appointment and Donation of God is that whereon we are judged and esteemed to have answered the Righteousness of the Law By the Obedience of One many are made Righteous Rom. 5.19 That the Righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us Rom. 8.4 And hence we argue If there be no other way whereby the Righteousness of the Law may be fulfilled in us without which we cannot be justified but must fall inevitably under the Penalty threatned unto the Transgression of it but only the Righteousness of Christ imputed unto us then is that the sole Righteousness whereby we are justified in the sight of God But the former is true and so therefore is the latter 12. On the supposition of this Law and its original obligation unto Obedience with its Sanction and Threatnings there can be but one of three ways whereby we may come to be justified before God who have sinned and are no way able in our selves to perform the Obedience for the future which it doth require And each of them have a respect unto a Soveraign Act of God with reference unto this Law The first is the Abrogation of it that it should no more oblige us either unto Obedience or Punishment This we have proved impossible and they will wofully deceive their own Souls who shall trust unto it The second is by transferring of its Obligation unto the End of Justification on a surety or common undertaker This is that which we plead for as the substance of the mystery of the Gospel considering the Person and Grace of this Undertakers or Surety And herein all things do tend unto the Exaltation of the Glory of God in all the holy properties of his nature with the fulfilling and establishing of the Law it self Math. 5.17 Rom. 3.31 chap. 8.4 chap. 10.3 4. The third way is by an Act of God towards the Law and another towards us whereby the nature of the Righteousness which the Law requireth is changed which we shall examine as the only reserve against our present Argument 3. It is said therefore that by our own personal Obedience we do answer the Righteousness of the Law so far as it is required of us But whereas no sober person can imagine that we can or that any one in our lapsed
those who have all their sins forgiven have the Blessedness of Justification and there is neither need nor use of any farther Imputation of Righteousness unto them And sundry other things of the same nature are urged unto the same purpose which will be all of them either obviated in the insuing discourse or answered elswhere Answ. This cause is of more importance and more evidently stated in the Scriptures than to be turned into such niceties which have more of Philosophical subtilty than Theological solidity in them This exception therefore might be dismissed without farther answer than what is given us in the known rule That a truth well established and confirmed is not to be questioned much less relinquished on every intangling sophism though it should appear insoluble But as we shall see there is no such difficulty in these arguings but what may easily be discussed And because the matter of the Plea contained in them is made use of by sundry learned Persons who yet agree with us in the substance of the Doctrine of Justification namely that it is by Faith alone without Works through the Imputation of the Merit and Satisfaction of Christ. I shall as briefly as I can discover the mistakes that it proceeds upon 1. It includes a supposition That he who is pardoned his sins of omission and commission is esteemed to have done all that is required of him and to have committed nothing that is forbidden For without this supposition the bare pardon of sin will neither make constitute nor denominate any Man righteous But this is far otherwise nor is any such thing included in the nature of Pardon For in the Pardon of sin neither God nor Man do judge That he who hath sinned hath not sinned which must be done if he who is pardoned be esteemed to have done all that he ought and to have done nothing that he ought not to do If a Man be brought on his tryal for any evil fact and being legally convicted thereof is discharged by Soveraign Pardon it is true that in the eye of the Law he is looked upon as an innocent man as unto the punishment that was due unto him but no Man thinks that he is made righteous thereby or is esteemed not to have done that which really he hath done and whereof he was convicted Joab and Abiathar the Priest were at the same time guilty of the same crime Solomon gives order that Joab be put to death for his crime but unto Abiathar he gives a Pardon Did he thereby make declare or constitute him righteous Himself expresseth the contrary affirming him to be unrighteous and guilty only he remitted the punishment of his fault 1 King 2.26 Wherefore the Pardon of sin dischargeth the guilty person from being liable or obnoxious unto Anger Wrath or Punishment due unto his sin but it doth not suppose nor infer in the least that he is thereby or ought thereon to be esteemed or adjudged to have done no evil and to have fulfilled all righteousness Some say Pardon gives a righteousness of Innocency but not of Obedience But it cannot give a Righteousness of Innocency absolutely such as Adam had For he had actually done no evil It only removeth guilt which is the respect of sin unto punishment insuing on the Sanction of the Law And this Supposition which is an evident mistake animates this whole Objection The like may be said of what is in like manner supposed namely That not to be unrighteous which a man is on the pardon of sin is the same with being righteous For if not to be unrighteous be taken privatively it is the same with being just or righteous For it supposeth that he who is so hath done all the duty that is required of him that he may be righteous But not to be unrighteous negatively as the expression is here used it doth not do so For at best it supposeth no more but that a Man as yet hath done nothing actually against the Rule of Righteousness Now this may be when yet he hath performed none of the duties that are required of him to constitute him righteous because the times and occasions of them are not yet And so it was with Adam in the state of Innocency which is the height of what can be attained by the compleat pardon of sin 2. It proceeds on this Supposition That the Law in case of sin doth not oblige unto punishment and obedience both so as that it is not satisfied fulfilled or complied withal unless it be answered with respect unto both For if it doth so then the pardon of sin which only frees us from the penalty of the Law doth yet leave it necessary that Obedience be performed unto it even all that it doth require But this in my judgment is an evident mistake and that such as doth not establish the Law but make it void And this I shall demonstrate 1. The Law hath two parts or powers 1. It s preceptive part commanding and requiring obedience with a promise of life annexed Do this and live 2. The sanction on supposition of disobedience binding the sinner unto punishment or a meet recompence of reward In the day thou sinnest thou shalt die And every Law properly so called proceeds on these suppositions of obedience or disobedience whence its commanding and punishing Power are inseparate from its Nature 2. This Law whereof we speak was first given unto Man in innocency and therefore the first power of it was only in act It obliged only unto Obedience For an innocent person could not be obnoxious unto its sanction which contained only an obligation unto punishment on supposition of disobedience It could not therefore oblige our first Parents unto Obedience and Punishment both seeing its Obligation unto Punishment could not be in actual force but on supposition of actual disobedience A Moral Cause of and Motive unto Obedience it was and had an influence into the preservation of Man from sin Unto that end it was said unto him In the day thou eatest thou shalt surely die The neglect hereof and of that ruling influence which it ought to have had on the minds of our first Parents opened the door unto the entrance of sin But it implies a contradiction that an innocent person should be under an actual obligation unto punishment from the sanction of the Law It bound only unto Obedience as all Laws with Penalties do before their transgression But 3. On the committing of sin and it is so with every one that is guilty of sin Man came under an actual obligation unto punishment This is no more questionable than whether at first he was under an Obligation unto Obedience But then the Question is whether the first Intention and Obligation of the Law unto Obedience doth cease to affect the sinner or continue so as at the same time to oblige him unto Obedience and Punishment both its Powers being in act towards him And hereunto I say 1. Had the
same manner as it was under the Covenant of Works But the Argument speaks not as unto the manner or way whereby it is so but to the thing it self If it be so in any way or manner under what qualifications soever we are under that Covenant still If it be of Works any way it is not of Grace at all But it is added that the differences are such as are sufficient to constitute Covenants effectually distinct As 1. The perfect sinless obedience was required in the first Covenant but in the new that which is imperfect and accompanied with many sins and failings is accepted Answ. This is gratis dictum and begs the Question No Righteousness unto Justification before God is or can be accepted but what is perfect 2. Grace is the original fountain and cause of all our acceptation before God in the new Covenant Answ. It was so also in the old The Creation of Man in Original Righteousness was an effect of Divine Grace Benignity and Goodness And the reward of Eternal Life in the enjoyment of God was of meer Soveraign Grace Yet what was then of Works was not of Grace no more is it at present 3. There would then have been Merit of Works which is now excluded Answ. Such a Merit as ariseth from an equality and proportion between Works and Reward by the rule of commutative Justice would not have been in the Works of the first Covenant and in no other sense is it now rejected by them that oppose the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. 4. All is now resolved into the Merit of Christ upon the account whereof alone our own Personal Righteousness is accepted before God unto our Justification Answ. The Question is not on what account nor for what reason it is so accepted but whether it be or no seeing its so being is effectually constitutive of a Covenant of Works CHAP. XIV The Exclusion of all sorts of Works from an interest in Justification What intended by the Law and the Works of it in the Epistles of Paul WE shall take our Fourth Argument from the express Exclusion of all Works of what sort soever from our Justification before God For this alone is that which we plead namely that no Acts or Works of our own are the Causes or Conditions of our Justification but that the whole of it is resolved into the Free Grace of God through Jesus Christ as the Mediator and Surety of the Covenant To this purpose the Scripture speaks expresly Rom. 3.28 Therefore we conclude that a Man is justified by Faith without the Works of the Law Rom. 4.5 But unto him that worketh not but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly his Faith is counted for Righteousness Rom. 11.6 If it be of Grace then is it not of Works Gal. 2.16 Knowing that a Man is not justified by the Works of the Law but by the Faith of Jesus Christ even we have believed in Jesus Christ that we might be justified by the Faith of Christ and not by the Works of the Law for by the Works of the Law shall no flesh be justified Eph. 2.8 9. For by Grace are ye saved through Faith not of Works lest any Man should boast Tit. 3.5 Not by Works of Righteousness which we have done but according unto his Mercy he hath saved us These and the like Testimonies are express and in positive Terms assert all that we contend for And I am perswaded that no unprejudiced person whose mind is not prepossessed with notions and distinctions whereof not the least Title is offered unto them from the Texts mentioned nor elsewhere can but judg that the Law in every sense of it and all sorts of Works whatever that at any time or by any means Sinners or Believers do or can perform are not in this or that sense but every way and in all senses excluded from our Justification before God And if it be so it is the Righteousness of Christ alone that we must betake our selves unto or this matter must cease for ever And this Inference the Apostle himself makes from one of the Testimonies before-mentioned namely that of Gal. 2.16 for he adds upon it I through the Law am dead to the Law that I might live unto God I am crucified with Christ nevertheless I live yet not I but Christ liveth in me and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the Faith of the Son of God who loved me and gave himself for me I do not frustrate the Grace of God for if Righteousness come by the Law then is Christ dead in vain Our Adversaries are extreamly divided amongst themselves and can come unto no consistency as to the sense and meaning of the Apostle in these Assertions for what is proper and obvious unto the understanding of all Men especially from the opposition that is made between the Law and Works on the one hand and Faith Grace and Christ on the other which are opposed as inconsistent in this matter of our Justification they will not allow nor can do so without the ruine of the opinions they plead for Wherefore their various conjectures shall be examined as well to shew their inconsistency among themselves by whom the Truth is opposed as to confirm our present Argument 1. Some say it is the Ceremonial Law alone and the Works of it that are intended or the Law as given unto Moses on Mount Sinai containing that intire Covenant that was afterwards to be abolished This was of old the common opinion of the Schoolmen though it be now generally exploded And the opinion lately contended for that the Apostle Paul excludes Justification from the Works of the Law not because no Man can yield that perfect obedience which the Law requires or excludes Works absolutely perfect and sinless obedience but because the Law it self which he intends could not justifie any by the observation of it is nothing but the renovation of this obsolete notion that it is the Ceremonial Law only or which upon the matter is all one the Law given on Mount Sinai abstracted from the Grace of the Promise which could not justifie any in the observation of its Rites and Commands But of all other conjectures this is the most impertinent and contradictory unto the design of the Apostle and is therefore rejected by Bellarmine himself For the Apostle treats of that Law whose doers shall be justified Chap 2.13 And the Authors of this opinion would have it to be a Law that can justifie none of them that do it That Law he intends whereby is the knowledge of sin for he gives this reason why we cannot be justified by the Works of it namely Because by it is the knowledge of sin Chap. 3.20 And by what Law is the knowledge of sin he expresly declares where he affirms That he had not known Lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not covet Chap. 7.7 which is the Moral Law alone That Law he designs
given by Moses we have already shewed the Vanity of that pretence But if they mean thereby the whole Law or Rule of Obedience given unto the Church of Israel under the Old Testament they express much of the Truth it may be more than they designed 5. Some say that it is Works with a Conceit of Merit that makes the Reward to be of Debt and not of Grace that are excluded by the Apostle But no such distinction appeareth in the Text or Context For 1. The Apostle excludeth all Works of the Law that is that the Law requireth of us in a way of Obedience be they of what sort they will 2. The Law requireth no Works with a Conceit of Merit 3. Works of the Law Originally included no Merit as that which ariseth from the Proportion of one thing unto another in the Ballance of Justice and in that sense only is it rejected by those who plead for an Interest of Works in Justification 4. The Merit which the Apostle excludes is that which is inseparable from Works so that it cannot be excluded unless the Works themselves be so And unto their Merit two things concur 1. A Comparative boasting that is not absolutely in the sight of God which follows the Meritum ex condigno which some poor sinful Mortals have fancied in their Works but that which gives one man a preference above another in the obtaining of Justification which Grace will not allow Chap. 4.2 2. That the Reward be not absolutely of Grace but that respect be had therein unto Works which makes it so far to be of debt not out of an internal Condignity which would not have been under the Law of Creation but out of some Congruity with respect unto the promise of God v. 4. In these two regards Merit is inseparable from Works and the Holy Ghost utterly to exclude it excludeth all Works from which it is inseparable as it is from all Wherefore 5. The Apostle speaks not one word about the exclusion of the Merit of Works only but he excludeth all Works whatever and that by this Argument that the Admission of them would necessarily introduce merit in the sense described which is inconsistent with Grace And although some think that they are injuriously dealt withal when they are charged with maintaining of merit in their asserting the Influence of our Works into our Justification yet those of them who best understand themselves and the Controversie it self are not so averse from some kind of merit as knowing that it is inseparable from Works 6. Some contend that the Apostle excludes only Works wrought before believing in the strength of our own Wills and Natural Abilities without the aid of Grace Works they suppose required by the Law are such as we perform by the Direction and Command of the Law alone But the Law of Faith requireth Works in the strength of the supplies of Grace which are not excluded This is that which the most learned and judicious of the Church of Rome do now generally betake themselves unto Those who amongst us plead for Works in our Justification as they use many distinctions to explain their Minds and free their Opinion from a co-incidence with that of the Papists so as yet they deny the name of Merit and the thing it self in the sense of the Church of Rome as it is renounced likewise by all the Socinians Wherefore they make use of the preceding Evasion that Merit is excluded by the Apostle and Works only as they are meritorious although the Apostles plain Argument be that they are excluded because such a Merit as is inconsistent with Grace is inseparable from their Admission But the Roman Church cannot so part with Merit Wherefore they are to find out a sort of Works to be excluded only which they are content to part withal as not meritorious Such are those before described wrought as they say before believing and without the aids of Grace and such they say are all the Works of the Law And this they do with some more Modesty and Sobriety than those amongst us who would have only external Works and Observances to be intended For they grant that sundry internal Works as those of Attrition sorrow for Sin and the like are of this Nature But the Works of the Law it is they say that are excluded But this whole Plea and all the Sophisms wherewith it is countenanced hath been so discussed and defeated by Protestant Writers of all sorts against Bellarmine and others as that it is needless to repeat the same things or to add any thing unto them And it will be sufficiently evinced of falshood in what we shall immediately prove concerning the Law and Works intended by the Apostle However the Heads of the Demonstration of the Truth to the contrary may be touched on And 1. The Apostle excludeth all Works without distinction or exception And we are not to distinguish where the Law doth not distinguish before us 2. All the Works of the Law are excluded therefore all Works wrought after believing by the aids of Grace are excluded For they are all required by the Law See Psal. 119.35 Rom. 7.22 Works not required by the Law are no less an Abomination to God than Sins against the Law 3. The Works of Believers after Conversion performed by the Aids of Grace are expresly excluded by the Apostle So are those of Abraham after he had been a Believer many years and abounded in them unto the Praise of God So he excludeth his own Works after his Conversion Gal. 2.16 1 Cor. 4.4 Phil. 3.9 And so he excludeth the Works of all other Believers Ephes. 2.9 10. 4. All Works are excluded that might give countenance unto boasting Rom. 4.2 Chap. 3.17 Eph. 2.9 1 Cor. 1.29 30 31. But this is done more by the Good Works of regenerate Persons than by any Works of Unbelievers 5. The Law required Faith and Love in all our Works and therefore if all the Works of the Law be excluded the best works of Believers are so 6. All Works are excluded which are opposed unto Grace working freely in our Justification But this all Works whatever are Rom. 11.6 7. In the Epistle unto the Galatians the Apostle doth exclude from our Justification all those Works which the false Teachers pressed as necessary thereunto But they urged the necessity of the Works of Believers and those which were by Grace already converted unto God For those upon whom they pressed them unto this End were already actually so 8. They are Good Works that the Apostle excludeth from our Justification For there can be no Pretence of Justification by those Works that are not Good or which have not all things essentially requisite to make them so But such are all the Works of Unbelievers performed without the Aids of Grace they are not Good nor as such accepted with God but want what is essentially requisite unto the Constitution of Good Works And it is ridiculous to think
in as much because Only we must say that here is a reason given Why Death passed on all Men in as much as all have sinned that is in that sin whereby death entred into the World It is true Death by vertue of the original constitution of the Law is due unto every sin when ever it is committed But the present inquiry is how Death passed at once on all Men how they came liable and obnoxious unto it upon its first entrance by the actual sin of Adam which cannot be by their own actual sin Yea the Apostle in the next Verses affirms That death passed on them also who never sinned actually or as Adam did whose sin was actual And if the actual sins of Men in imitation of Adams sin were intended then should Men be made liable to Death before they had sinned For Death upon its first entrance into the World passed on all Men before any one Man had actually sinned but Adam only But that Men should be liable unto Death which is nothing but the punishment of sin when they have not sinned is an open contradiction For although God by his sovereign Power might inflict Death on an innocent Creature yet that an innocent Creature should be guilty of death is impossible For to be guilty of death is to have sinned Wherefore this expression In as much as all have sinned expressing the desert and guilt of death then when sin and death first entred into the World no sin can be intended in it but the sin of Adam and our interest therein Eramus enim omnes ille unus homo And this can be no otherwise but by the imputation of the guilt of that sin unto us For the act of Adam not being ours inherently and subjectively we cannot be concerned in its Effect but by the imputation of its guilt For the communication of that unto us which is not inherent in us is that which we intend by imputation This is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the intended collation which I have insisted the longer on because the Apostle lays in it the foundation of all that he afterwards infers and asserts in in the whole comparison And here some say there is an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in his discourse that is he layeth down the Proposition on the part of Adam but doth not shew what answereth to it on the contrary in Christ. And Origen gives the reason of the silence of the Apostle herein namely Lest what is to be said therein should be abused by any unto sloth and negligence For whereas he says 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as which is a note of similitude By one Man sin entred into the World and Death by sin so the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or reddition should be So by one Righteousness entred into the World and Life by Righteousness This he acknowledgeth to be the genuine filling up of the comparison but was not expressed by the Apostle Lest Men should abuse it unto negligence or security supposing that to be done already which should be done afterwards But as this plainly contradicts and everts most of what he further asserts in the Exposition of the place so the Apostle concealed not any Truth upon such considerations And as he plainly expresseth that which is here intimated Ver. 19. So he shews how foolish and wicked any such imaginations are as suppose that any countenance is given hereby unto any to indulge themselves in their sins Some grant therefore that the Apostle doth conceal the Expression of what is ascribed unto Christ in opposition unto what he had affirmed of Adam and his sin unto Ver. 19. But the truth is it is sufficiently included in the close of Ver. 14. where he affirms of Adam that in those things whereof he treats He was the Figure of him that was to come For the way and manner whereby he introduced Righteousness and Life and communicated them unto Men answered the way and manner whereby Adam introduced sin and death which passed on all the World Adam being the Figure of Christ look how it was with him with respect unto his Natural Posterity as unto sin and death so it is with the Lord Christ the Second Adam and his Spiritual Posterity with respect unto Righteousness and Life Hence we argue If the actual sin of Adam was so imputed unto all his posterity as to be accounted their own sin unto condemnation then is the actual obedience of Christ the Second Adam imputed unto all his Spiritual Seed that is unto all Believers unto Justification I shall not here further press this Argument because the ground of it will occur unto us afterwards The two next Verses containing an Objection and an Answer returned unto them wherein we have no immediate concernment I shall pass by Vers. 15 16. The Apostle proceeds to explain his Comparison in those things wherein there is a dissimilitude between the comparates But not as the offence so is the free gift for if through the offence of one many be dead much more the Grace of God and the gift by Grace by one Man Jesus Christ hath abounded unto many The opposition is between 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 on the one hand and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 on the other between which a dissimilitude is asserted not as unto their opposite effects of Death and Life but only as unto the degrees of their efficacy with respect unto those effects 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the offence the fall the sin the transgression that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the disobedience of one Ver. 19. Hence the first sin of Adam is generally called the fall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That which is opposed hereunto is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Donum Donum gratuitum Beneficium id quod Deus gratificatur that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it is immediately explained The grace of God and the free gift by grace through Jesus Christ. Wherefore although this word in the next verse doth precisely signifie the Righteousness of Christ yet here it comprehends all the causes of our Justification in opposition unto the fall of Adam and the entrance of sin thereby The consequent and effect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the offence the fall is that many be dead No more is here intended by many but only that the effects of that one offence were not confined unto one And if we inquire who or how many those many are the Apostle tells us that they are all Men universally that is all the posterity of Adam By this one offence because they all sinned therein they are all dead that is rendered obnoxious and liable unto death as the punishment due unto that one offence And hence also it appears how vain it is to wrest those words of Ver. 12. In as much as all have sinned unto any other sin but the first sin in Adam seeing it is given as the reason why death passed on them it being here plainly affirmed That they
so in the translation of the guilt of the sinner unto it as is fully declared Levit. 16.20 21. Only I must say that I grant this signification of the word to avoid contention For whereas some say that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies sin and a sacrifice for sin it cannot be allowed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Kal signifies to err to sin to transgress the Law of God In Piel it hath a contrary signification namely to cleanse from sin or to make expiation of sin Hence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is most frequently used with respect unto its derivation from the first conjugation and signifies sin transgression and guilt But sometimes with respect unto the second and then it signifies a sacrifice for sin to make expiation of it And so it is rendered by the LXX sometimes by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ezek. 44.27 sometimes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Exod. 30.10 Ezek. 43.23 A Propitiation a Propitiatory Sacrifice Sometimes by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Num. 19.19 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Purification or Cleasing But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 absolutely doth no where in any good Author nor in the Scripture signifie a Sacrifice for sin unless it may be allowed to do so in this one place alone For whereas the LXX do render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 constantly by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where it signifies sin where it denotes an Offering for sin and they retain that word they do it by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an Elliptical expression which they invented for that which they knew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of its self neither did nor could signifie Lev. 4.3 14 32 35. Chap. 5.6 7 8 9 10 11. Chap. 6.30 Chap. 8.2 And they never omit the preposition unless they name the Sacrifice as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is observed also by the Apostle the new Testament For twice expressing the Sin-offering by this word he useth that phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 8.3 Heb. 10.6 But no where useth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to that purpose If it be therefore of that signification in this place it is so here alone And whereas some think that it answers Piaculum in the Latine it is also a mistake for the first signification of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is confessed to be sin and they would have it supposed that thence it is abused to signifie a Sacrifice for sin But Piaculum is properly a Sacrifice or any thing whereby sin is expiated or satisfaction is made for it And very rarely it is abused to denote such a sin or crime as deserves publick expiation and is not otherwise to be pardoned so Virgil Distulit in seram commissa Piacula mortem But we shall not contend about words whilest we can agree about what is intended The only enquiry is how God did make him to be sin He hath made him to be sin so that an act of God is intended And this is elsewhere expressed by his laying all our Iniquities upon him or causing them to meet on him Isa. 53.6 And this was by the Imputation of our sins unto him as the sins of the people were put on the Head of the Goat that they should be no more theirs but his so as that he was to carry them away from them Take sin in either sense before mentioned either of a Sacrifice for sin or a Sinner and the Imputation of the guilt of sin antecedently unto the punishment of it and in order thereunto must be understood For in every Sacrifice for sin there was an imposition of sin on the Beast to be offered antecedent unto the Sacrificing of it and therein its suffering by death Therefore in every offering for sin he that brought it was to put his hand on the head of it Lev. 1.4 And that the transferring of the guilt of sin unto the offering was thereby signified is expresly declared Lev. 16.21 Wherefore if God made the Lord Christ a Sin Offering for us it was by the Imputation of the guilt of sin unto him antecedently unto his suffering Nor could any Offering be made for sin without a Typical translation of the guilt of sin unto it And therefore when an Offering was made for the expiation of the guilt of an uncertain Murther those who were to make it by the Law namely the Elders of the City that were next unto the place where the man was slain were not to offer a Sacrifice because there was none to confess guilt over it or to lay guilt upon it But whereas the neck of an Heifer was to be stricken off to declare the punishment due unto Blood they were to wash their hands over it to testifie their own Innocency Deut. 21.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. But a Sacrifice for sin without the Imputation of guilt there could not be And if the word be taken in the second sense namely for a sinner that is by imputation and in Gods esteem it must be by the imputation of guilt For none can in any sense be denominated a sinner from mere suffering None indeed do say that Christ was made sin by the imputation of punishment unto him which hath no proper sense But they say sin was imputed unto him as unto punishment which is indeed to say that the guilt of sin was imputed unto him For the guilt of sin is its respect unto punishment or the obligation unto punishment which attends it And that any one should be punished for sin without the imputation of the guilt of it unto him is impossible and were it possible would be unjust For it is not possible that any one should be punished for sin properly and yet that sin be none of his And if it be not his by inhaesion it can be his no other way but by imputation One may suffer on the occasion of the sin of another that is no way made his but he cannot be punished for it for punishment is the recompence of sin on the account of its guilt And were it possible where is the Righteousness of punishing any one for that which no way belongs unto him Besides imputation of sin and punishing are distinct acts the one preceding the other and therefore the former is only of the guilt of sin Wherefore the Lord Christ was made sin for us by the imputation of the guilt of our sins unto him But it is said that if the guilt of sin were imputed unto Christ he is excluded from all possibility of merit for he suffered but what was his due And so the whole work of Christs satisfaction is subverted This must be so if God in judgment did reckon him guilty and a sinner But there is an ambiguity in these expressions If it be meant that God in judgment did reckon him guilty and a sinner inherently in his own person no such thing is intended But God laid all our sins on him and in judgment spared him not as unto what was due unto them And so he suffered
it was in force was a duty of the Moral Law And the Works of the Law are the Works and Duties of Obedience which this Law of God requires performed in the manner that it prescribes namely in Faith and out of love unto God above all as hath been proved To say that the Apostle excludeth only Works absolutely perfect which none ever did or could perform since the entrance of sin is to suppose him to dispute with great earnestness and many Arguments against that which no Man asserted and which he doth not once mention in all his discourse Nor can he be said to exclude only Works that are looked on as meritorious seeing he excludeth all Works that there may be no place for merit in our Justification as hath also been proved Nor did these Galatians whom he writes unto and convinceth them of their error look for Justification from any Works but such as they performed then when they were Believers So that all sorts of Works are excluded from any interest in our Justification And so much weight doth the Apostle lay on this exclusion of Works from our Justification as that he affirms That the admittance of it overthrows the whole Gospel Ver. 21. For saith he if Righteousness be by the Law then is Christ dead in vain and it is dangerous venturing on so sharp a fence Not this or that sort of Works not this or that manner of the performance of them not this or that kind of interest in our Justification but all Works of what sort soever and however performed are excluded from any kind of consideration in our Justification as our Works or Duties of Obedience For these Galatians whom the Apostle reproves desired no more but that in the Justification of a Believer Works of the Law or Duties of Obedience might be admitted into a conjunction or copartnership witn Faith in Christ Jesus For that they would exclude Faith in him and assign Justification unto Works without it nothing is intimated and it is a foolish imagination In opposition hereunto he positively ascribes our Justification unto Faith in Christ alone Not by Works but by Faith is by Faith alone That the Particles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are not exceptive but adversative hath not only been undeniably proved by Protestant Divines but is acknowledged by those of the Roman Church who pretend unto any modesty in this Controversie The words of Estius on this place deserve to be transcribed Nisi per fidem Jesu Christi sententiam reddit obscuram particula Nisi so the vulgar Latin renders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 instead of sed or sed tantum quae si proprie ut Latinis auribus sonat accipiatur exceptionem facit ab eo quod praecedit ut sensus sit hominem non justificari ex operibus Legis nisi fides in Chrislum ad ea opera accedat quae si accesserit justificari eum per legis opera Sed cum hic sensus Justificationem dividat partim eam tribuens operibus legis partim fidei Christi quod est contra definitam absolutam Apostoli sententiam manifestum est interpretationem illam tanquam Apostolico sensui scopo contrariam omnino repudiandam esse Verum constat voculam nisi frequenter in Scripturis adversative sumi ut idem valeat quod Sed tantum So he according to his usual candor and ingenuity It is not probable that we shall have an end of contending in this World when Men will not acquiesce in such plain Determinations of Controversies given by the Holy Ghost himself The Interpretation of this place given as the meaning of the Apostle That Men cannot be justified by those Works which they cannot perform that is Works absolutely perfect but may be so and are so by those which they can and do perform if not in their own strength yet by the aid of Grace And that Faith in Christ Jesus which the Apostle opposeth absolutely unto all Works whatever doth include in it all those Works which he excludes and that with respect unto that end or effect with respect whereunto they are excluded cannot well be supposed to be suitable unto the mind of the Holy Ghost Ephes. 2.8 9 10. For by Grace ye are saved through Faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God not of Works lest any Man should boast For we are his Workmanship created in Christ Jesus unto good Works which God hath fore-ordained that we should walk in them Unless it had seemed good unto the Holy Ghost to have expressed before hand all the evasions and subterfuges which the wit of Man in after ages could invent to pervert the Doctrine of our Justification before God and to have rejected them it is impossible they could have been more plainly prevented then they are in this context If we may take a little unprejudiced consideration of it I suppose what is affirmed will be evident It cannot be denied but that the design of the Apostle from the beginning of this Chapter unto the end of Ver. 11. is to declare the way whereby lost and condemned sinners come to be delivered and translated out of that condition into an estate of acceptance with God and eternal Salvation thereon And therefore in the first place he fully describeth their natural state with their being obnoxious unto the wrath of God thereby For such was the method of this Apostle unto the Declaration of the Grace of God in any kind he did usually yea constantly premise the consideration of our sin misery and ruine Others now like not this method so well Howbeit this hinders not but that it was his Unto this purpose he declares unto the Ephesians That they were dead in trespasses and sins expressing the power that sin had on their Souls as unto Spiritual life and all the actions of it but withal that they lived and walked in sin and on all accounts were the children of wrath or subject and liable unto eternal condemnation Ver. 1 2 3. What such persons can do towards their own deliverance there are many terms found out to express all passing my understanding seeing the intire design of the Apostle is to prove that they can do nothing at all But another cause or other causes of it he finds out and that in direct express opposition unto any thing that may be done by our selves unto that end 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ver. 4. It is not a work for us to undertake it is not what we can contribute any thing unto But God who is rich in mercy The adversative includes an opposition unto every thing on our part and incloseth the whole work to God Would Men have rested on this Divine Revelation the Church of God had been free from many of those perverse opinions and wrangling disputes which it hath been pestered withal But they will not so easily part with thoughts of some kind of interest in being the Authors of their own happiness Wherefore two
Holiness without which no man shall see God vehemently declaming against that Doctrine as destructive of Holiness which was so fruitful in it in former days 2. It doth not appear as yet in general that an attempt to introduce a Doctrine contrary unto it hath had any great success in the Reformation of the lives of men Nor hath personal Righteousness or Holiness as yet much thrived under the conduct of it as to what may be observed It will be time enough to seek countenance unto it by declaming against that which hath formerly had better effects when it hath a little more commended it self by its fruits 3. It were not amiss if this part of the controversie might amongst us all be issued in the advise of the Apostle James Chap. 2.18 Shew me thy Faith by thy works and I will shew thee my Faith by my works Let us all labour that fruits may thus far determine of Doctrines as unto their use unto the interest of Righteousness and Holiness For that Faith which doth not evidence it self by works that hath not this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this Index which James calls for whereby it may be found out and examined is of no use nor consideration herein Secondly The same Objection was from the beginning laid against the Doctrine of the Apostle Paul the same charge was managed against it which sufficiently argues that it is the same Doctrine which is now assaulted with it This himself more than once takes notice of Rom. 3.31 Do we make void the Law through Faith It is an objection that he anticipates against his Doctrine of the free Justification of sinners through Faith in the blood of Christ. And the substance of the charge included in these words is that he destroyed the Law took off all Obligation unto Obedience and brought in Antinomianism So again Chap. 6.1 What shall we say then shall we continue in sin that grace may abound Some thought this the natural and genuine consequence of what he had largely discoursed concerning Justification which he had now fully closed and some think so still If what he taught concerning the grace of God in our Justification be true it will not only follow that there will be no need of any relinquishment of sin on our part but also a continuance in it must needs tend unto the exaltation of that grace which he had so extolled The same objection he repeats again v. 15. What then shall we sin because we are not under the Law but under Grace And in sundry other places doth he obviate the same objection where he doth not absolutely suppose it especially Ephes. 2.9 10. we have therefore no Reason to be surprized with nor much to be moved at this objection and charge for it is no other but what was insinuated or managed against the Doctrine of the Apostle himself whatever inforcements are now given it by subtilty of arguing or Rhetorical exaggerations However evident it is that there are naturally in the minds of men efficacious prejudices against this part of the Mystery of the Gospel which began betimes to manifest themselves and ceased not until they had corrupted the whole Doctrine of the Church herein And it were no hard matter to discover the principal of them were that our present business However it hath in part been done before 3. It is granted that this Doctrine both singly by it self or in conjunction with whatever else concerns the grace of God by Christ Jesus is liable unto abuse by them in whom darkness and the love of sin is predominant For hence from the very beginning of our Religion some fancied unto themselves that a bare assent unto the Gospel was that Faith whereby they should be saved and that they might be so however they continued to live in sin and a neglect of all Duties of Obedience This is evident from the Epistles of John James and Jude in an especial manner Against this pernicious evil we can give no relief whilest men will love darkness more than light because their deeds are evil And it would be a fond imagination in any to think that their modellings of this Doctrine after this manner will prevent future abuse If they will it is by rendring it no part of the Gospel for that which is so was ever liable to be abused by such persons as we speak of These general observations being premised which are sufficient of themselves to discard this Objection from any place in the minds of sober men I shall only add the consideration of what answers the Apostle Paul returns unto it with a brief application of them unto our purpose The objection made unto the Apostle was that he made void the Law that he rendred good works needless and that on the supposition of his Doctrine men might live in sin unto the advancement of Grace And as unto his sense hereof we may observe 1. That he never returns that answer unto it no not once which some think is the only answer whereby it may be satisfied and removed namely the necessity of our own personal Righteousness and Obedience or Works in order unto our Justification before God For that by Faith without Works he understandeth Faith and Works is an unreasonable supposition If any do yet pretend that he hath given any such answer let them produce it as yet it hath not been made to appear And is it not strange that if this indeed were his Doctrine and the contrary a mistake of it namely that our personal Righteousness Holiness and Works had an influence into our justification and were in any sort our Righteousness before God therein that he who in an eminent manner every where presseth the necessity of them sheweth their true nature and use both in general and in particular Duties of all sorts above any of the Writers of the new Testament should not make use of this truth in answer unto an objection wherein he was charged to render them all needless and useless His Doctrine was urged with this objection as himself acknowledged and on the account of it rejected by many Rom. 10.3 4. Gal. 2.3 He did see and know that the corrupt lusts and depraved affections of the minds of many would supply them with subtile arguings against it Yea he did foresee by the Holy Spirit as appeareth in many places of his Writings that it would be perverted and abused And surely it was highly incumbent on him to obviate what in him lay these evils and so state his Doctrine upon this objection that no countenance might ever be given unto it And is it not strange that he should not on this occasion once at least somewhere or other give an intimation that although he rejected the works of the Law yet he maintained the necessity of Evangelical Works in order unto our Justification before God as the condition of it or that whereby we are justified according unto the Gospel If this were indeed his
Doctrine and that which would so easily solve this difficulty and answer this objection as both of them are by some pretended certainly neither his wisdom nor his care of the Church under the conduct of the infallible Spirit would have suffered him to omit this reply were it consistent with the truth which he had delivered But he is so far from any such Plea that when the most unavoidable occasion was administred unto it he not only waves any mention of it but in its stead affirms that which plainly evidenceth that he allowed not of it See Eph. 2.9 10. Having positively excluded Works from our Justification not of Works least any man should boast it being natural thereon to enquire to what end do Works serve or is there any necessity of them instead of a distinction of Works legal and Evangelical in order unto our Justification he asserts the necessity of the later on other Grounds Reasons and Motives manifesting that they were those in particular which he excluded as we have seen in the consideration of the place Wherefore that we may not forsake his pattern and example in the same cause seeing he was Wiser and Holier knew more of the mind of God and had more zeal for personal Righteousness and Holiness in the Church than we all if we are pressed a Thousand times with this objection we shall never seek to deliver our selves from it by answering that we allow these things to be the condition or causes of our Justification or the matter of our Righteousness before God seeing he would not so do Secondly we may observe that in his answer unto this objection whether expresly mentioned or tacitly obviated he insisteth not any where upon the common principle of moral Duties but on those motives and reasons of Holiness Obedience good works alone which are peculiar unto Believers For the question was not whether all mankind were obliged unto Obedience unto God and the Duties thereof of by the moral Law But whether there were an Obligation from the Gospel upon Believers unto Righteousness Holiness and good Works such as was suited to affect and constrain their minds unto them Nor will we admit of any other state of the question but this only whether upon the supposition of our gratuitous justification through the imputation of the Righteousness of Christ there are in the Gospel grounds reasons and motives making necessary and efficaciously influencing the minds of Believers unto Obedience and good Works for those who are not Believers we have nothing to do with them in this matter nor do plead that Evangelical grounds and motives are suited or effectual to work them unto Obedience yea we know the contrary and that they are apt both to despise them and abuse them See I Cor. 1.23 24. 2 Cor. 4.4 such persons are under the Law and there we leave them unto the Authority of God in the moral Law But that the Apostle doth confine his enquiry unto Believers is evident in every place wherein he maketh mention of it Rom. 6.2 3. How shall we that are dead unto sin live any longer therein Know ye not that so many of us as were Baptized into Jesus Christ c. Eph. 2.10 For we are the workmanship of God created in Christ Jesus unto good Works Wherefore we shall not at all contend what cogency unto duties of Holiness there is in Gospel motives and reasons unto the minds of Vnbelievers whatever may be the truth in that case But what is their power force and efficacy towards them that truly believe Thirdly The answers which the Apostle returns positively unto this objection wherein he declares the necessity nature ends and use of Evangelical Righteousness and good Works are large and many comprehensive of a great part of the Doctrine of the Gospel I shall only mention the heads of some of them which are the same that we plead in the vindication of the same truth 1. He pleads the Ordination of God God hath before ordained that we should walk in them Eph. 2.10 God hath designed in the disposal of the order of the causes of Salvation that those who believe in Christ should live in walk in abound in good Works and all Duties of Obedience unto God To this end are Precepts Directions Motives and Encouragements every where multiplied in the Scripture Wherefore we say that good Works and that as they include the gradual progressive Renovation of our natures our growth and increase in grace with fruitfulness in our lives are necessary from the Ordination of God from his will and command And what need there any further dispute about the necessity of good Works among them that know what it is to believe or what respect there is in the Souls and Consciences of Believers unto the commands of God But what force say some is in this Command or Ordination of God when notwithstanding it and if we do not apply our selves unto Obedience we shall be justified by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ and so may be saved without them I say 1 As was before observed that it is Believers alone concerning whom this enquiry is made and there is none of them but will judge this a most unreasonable and senseless objection as that which ariseth from an utter ignorance of their state and relation unto God To suppose that the minds of Believers are not as much and as effectually influenced with the Authority and Commands of God unto Duty and Obedience as if they were all given in order unto their Justification is to consider neither what Faith is nor what it is to be a Believer nor what is the Relation that we stand in unto God by Faith in Christ Jesus nor what are the Arguments or motives wherewith the minds of such persons are principally affected and constrained This is the Answer which the Apostle gives at large unto this Exception Rom. 6.2 3. 2 The whole fallacy of this Exception is 1 In separating the things that God hath made inseparable These are our Justification and our Sanctification To suppose that the one of these may be without the other is to overthrow the whole Gospel 2 In compounding those things that are distinct namely Justification and eternal actual Salvation the respect of Works and Obedience being not the same unto them both as hath been declared Wherefore this Imagination that the commands of God unto Duty However given and unto what ends soever are not equally obligatory unto the Consciences of Believers as if they were all given in order unto their Justification before God is an absurd figment and which all of them who are truly so defie Yea they have a greater power upon them than they could have if the Duties required in them were in order unto their Justification and so were antecedent thereunto For thereby they must be supposed to have their efficacy upon them before they truly believe For to say that a man may be a true Believer or truly
Rule of all Inherent Moral or Spiritual Obedience What are the Works of the Law declared from the Scripture and the Argument thereby confirmed The nature of Justifying Faith further declared Pag. 400. CHAP. XV. Of Faith alone CHAP. XVI Testimonies of Scripture confirming the Doctrine of Justification by the Imputation of the Rightesness of Christ. Jere. 23.6 Explained and vindicated Pag. 419. CHAP. XVII Testimonies out of the Evangelists considered Design of our Saviours Sermon on the Mount The purity and penalty of the Law vindicated by him Arguments from thence Luk. 18.9 10 11 12 13. The Parable of the Pharisee and Publican explained and applied to the present Argument Testimonies out of the Gospel by John Chap. 3.14 15 16 17 18 c. Pag. 425. CHAP. XVIII Testimonies out of the Epistles of Paul the Apostle His design in the Fifth Chapter to the Romans That Design explained at large and applied to the present Argument Chap. 3.24 25 26. explained and the true sense of the words vindicated The Causes of Justification enumerated Apostolical Inferences from the consideration of them Chap. 4. Design of the Disputation of the Apostle therein Analysis of his Discourse Ver. 4 5. particularly insisted on their true sense vindicated What Works excluded from the Justification of Abraham Who it is that worketh not In what sense the ungodly are justified All Men ungodly antecedently unto their Justification Faith alone the means of Justification on our part Faith it self absolutely considered not the Righteousness that is imputed unto us Proved by sundry Arguments Pag. 431. Chap. 5. Ver. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18. Boasting excluded in our selves asserted in God The design and sum of the Apostles Argument Objection of Socinus removed Comparison between the two Adams and those that derive from them Sin entered into the World What Sin intended Death what it compriseth What intended by it The sense of those words in as much or in whom all have sinned cleared and vindicated The various oppositions used by the Apostle in this Discourse Principally between Sin or the Fall and the Free Gift Between the disobedience of the one and the obedience of another Judgment on the one hand and Justification unto Life on the other The whole Context at large explained and the Argument for Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ fully confirmed P. 464. Chap. 10. V. 3 4. explained and insisted on to the same purpose Pag. 489. 1 Cor. 1.30 Christ how of God made Righteousness unto us Answer of Bellarmine unto this Testimony removed That of Socinus disproved True sense of the words evinced P. 497. 2 Cor. 5.21 In what sense Christ knew no sin Emphasis in that expression How he was made Sin for us By the Imputation of Sin unto him Mistakes of some about this expression Sense of the Antients Exception of Bellarmine unto this Testimony answered with other Reasonings of his to the same purpose P. 502. The Exceptions of others also removed Gal. 2.16 Pag. 513. Ephes. 2.8 9 10. Ephes. 2.8 9 10. Evidence of this Testemony Design of the Apostle from the beginning of the Chapter Method of the Apostle in the Declaration of the Grace of God Grace alone the cause of Deliverance from a State of Sin Things to be observed in the Assignation of the Causes of Spiritual Deliverance Grace how magnified by him Force of the Argument and evidence from thence State of the Case here proposed by the Apostle General determination of it By Grace ye are saved What it is to be saved inquired into The same as to be justified but not exclusively The causes of our Justification declared Positively and Negatively The whole secured unto the Grace of God by Christ and our Interest therein through Faith alone Works excluded What Works Not Works of the Law of Moses Not Works antecedent unto believing Works of true Believers Not only in opposition to the Grace of God but to Faith in us Argument from those words Reason whereon this exclusion of Works is founded To exclude Boasting on our part Boasting wherein it consists Inseparable from the Interest of Works in Justification Danger of it Confirmation of this Reason obviating an Objection The Objection stated If we be not justified by Works of what use are they answered Pag. 516. Phil. 3.8 9. Heads of Argument from this Testimony Design of the Context Righteousness the Foundation of Acceptance with God A twofold Righteousness considered by the Apostle Oppossite unto one another as unto the especial end inquired after Which of these he adhered unto his own Righteousness or the Righteousness of God declared by the Apostle with vehemency of speech Reasons of his earnestness herein The turning point whereon he left Judaism The opposition made unto this Doctrine by the Jews The weight of the Doctrine and unwillingness of Men to receive it His own sense of Sin and Grace Peculiar expressions used in this place for the Reasons mentioned concerning Christ. Concerning all things that are our own The choice to be made on the Case stated whether we will adhere unto our own Righteousness or that of Christs which are inconsistent as to the end of Justification Argument from this place Exceptions unto this Testimony and Argument from thence removed Our Personal Righteousness Inherent the same with respect unto the Law and Gospel External Righteousness only required by the Law an impious Imagination Works wrought before Faith only rejected The Exception removed Righteousness before Conversion not intended by the Apostle Pag. 256. CHAP. XIX Objections against the Doctrine of Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Nature of these Objections Difficulty in discerning aright the sense of some Men in this Argument Justification by Works the end of all declension from the Righteousness of Christ. Objections against this Doctrine derived from a supposition thereof alone First principal Objection Imputed Righteousness overthrows the necessity of an holy Life This Objection as managed by them of the Church of Rome an open calumny How insisted on by some among our selves Socinus fierceness in this charge His foul dishonesty therein False charges on Mens opinions making way for the rash condemnation of their persons Iniquity of such censures The Objection rightly stated Sufficiently answered in the previous Discourses about the nature of Faith and force of Moral Law The nature and necessity of Evangelical Holiness elswhere pleaded Particular answers unto this Objection All who profess this Doctrine do not exemplifie it in their lives The most holy Truths have been abused None by whom this Doctrine is now denied exceed them in holiness by whom it was formerly professed and the power of it attested The contrary Doctrine not successful in the Reformation of the lives of Men. The best way to determine this difference The same Objection managed against the Doctrine of the Apostle in his own days Efficacious prejudices against this Doctrine in the minds of Men. The whole Doctrine of
but also the manner of our Participation of it or its Communication unto us from Faith to Faith the Faith of God in the Revelation and our Faith in the Acceptation of it being only here concerned is an eminent Revelation Righteousness of all things should rather seem to be from Works unto Works from the Work of Grace in us to the Works of Obedience done by us as the Papists affirm No saith the Apostle it is from Faith to Faith whereof afterwards This is the general Thesis the Apostle proposeth unto Confirmation and he seems therein to exclude from Justification every thing but the Righteousness of God and the Faith of Believers And to this purpose he considers all Persons that did or might pretend unto Righteousness or seek after it and all ways and means whereby they hoped to attain unto it or whereby it might most probably be obtained declaring the failing of all persons and the insufficiency of all means as unto them for the obtaining a Righteousness of our own before God And as unto Persons 1. He considers the Gentiles with all their notions of God their Practice in Religious Worship with their Conversation thereon And from the whole of what might be observed amongst them he concludes that they neither were nor could be justified before God but that they were all and that most deservedly obnoxious unto the sentence of Death And whatever men may discourse concerning the Justification and Salvation of any without the Revelation of the Righteousness of God by the Gospel from Faith to Faith it is expresly contradictory to his whole Discourse chap. 1. from ver 19. to the End 2. He considers the Jews who enjoyed the written Law and the Priviledges wherewith it was accompanied especially that of Circumcision which was the outward Seal of Gods Covenant And on many Considerations with many Arguments he excludes them also from any possibility of attaining Justification before God by any of the Priviledges they enjoyed or their own compliance therewithall chap. 2. And both sorts he excludes distinctly from this priviledge of Righteousness before God with this one Argument That both of them sinned openly against that which they took for the Rule of their Righteousness namely the Gentiles against the Light of Nature and the Jews against the Law whence it inevitably follows that none of them could attain unto the Righteousness of their own Rule But he proceeds farther unto that which is common to them all And 3. He proves the same against all sorts of Persons whether Jews or Gentiles from the consideration of the universal depravation of nature in them all and the horrible effects that necessarily ensue thereon in the Hearts and Lives of men chap. 3. So evidencing That as they all were so it could not fall out but that all must be shut up under sin and come short of Righteousness So from Persons he proceeds to Things or Means of Righteousness And 4. Because the Law was given of God immediately as the whole and only Rule of our Obedience unto him and the works of the Law are therefore all that is required of us these may be pleaded with some pretence as those whereby we may be justified Wherefore in particular he considers the Nature Use and End of the Law manifesting its utter insufficiency to be a means of our Justification before God chap. 3.19 20. 5. It may be yet objected That the Law and its works may be thus insufficient as it is obeyed by Vnbelievers in the state of Nature without the Aids of Grace administred in the Promise but with respect unto them who are Regenerate and do believe whose Faith and Works are accepted with God it may be otherwise To obviate this Objection he giveth an Instance in two of the most eminent Believers under the Old Testament namely Abraham and David declaring that all Works whatever were excluded in and from their Justification chap. 4. On these Principles and by this Gradation he peremptorily concludes That all and every one of the Sons of men as unto any thing that is in themselves or can be done by them or be wrought in them are guilty before God obnoxious unto Death shut up under sin and have their mouths so stopped as to be deprived of all pleas in their own excuse that they had no Righteousness wherewith to appear before God and that all the ways and means whence they expected it were insufficient unto that purpose Hereon he proceeds with his Enquiry how men may be delivered from this condition and come to be justified in the sight of God And in the Resolution hereof he makes no mention of any thing in themselves but only Faith whereby we receive the Attonement That whereby we are justified he saith is the Righteousness of God which is by the Faith of Christ Jesus or that we are justified freely by Grace through the Redemption that is in him chap. 3.22 23 24 25. And not content here with this answer unto the enquiry how lost convinced sinners may come to be justified before God namely That it is by the Righteousness of God revealed from Faith to Faith by Grace by the blood of Christ as he is set forth for a Propitiation He immediately proceeds unto a positive exclusion of every thing in and of our selves that might pretend unto an Interest herein as that which is inconsistent with the Righteousness of God as revealed in the Gospel and witnessed unto by the Law and the Prophets How contrary their Scheme of Divinity is unto this Design of the Apostle and his management of it who affirm that before the Law men were justified by Obedience unto the Light of Nature and some particular Revelations made unto them in things of their own especial private concernment and that after the giving of the Law they were so by Obedience unto God according to the Directions thereof as also that the Heathen might obtain the same benefit in compliance with the Dictates of Reason cannot be contradicted by any who have not a mind to be contentious Answerable unto this Declaration of the mind of the Holy Ghost herein by the Apostle is the constant Tenour of the Scripture speaking to the same purpose The Grace of God the Promise of Mercy the free pardon of Sin the Blood of Christ his Obedience and the Righteousness of God in him rested in and received by Faith are every where asserted as the causes and means of our Justification in opposition unto any thing in our selves so expressed as it useth to express the best of our Obedience and the utmost of our personal Righteousness Wherever mention is made of the Duties Obedience and personal Righteousness of the best of men with respect unto their Justification they are all renounced by them and they betake themselves unto Soveraign Grace and Mercy alone Some places to this purpose may be recounted The Foundation of the whole is laid in the first Promise wherein the Destruction of
which is far more sublime and excellent For he speaks not of an inclination or affection but expresseth the quality it self For he says not he made him a sinner but sin that we might be made not meerly Righteous but Righteousness and that the Righteousness of God when we are justified not by works for if we should there must be no spot found in them but by Grace whereby all sin is blotted out So Bernard also Epist. 190. ad Innocent Homo qui debuit homo qui solvit Nam si unus inquit pro omnibus mortuus est ergo omnes mortui sunt ut videlicet satisfactio unius omnibus imputetur sicut omnium peccata unus ille portavit Nec alter jam inveniatur qui for as fecit alter qui satisfecit quia Caput Corpus unus est Christus And many more speak unto the same purpose Hence Luther before he engaged in the Work of Reformation in an Epistle to one George Spenlein a Monk was not afraid to write after this manner Mi dulcis frater disce Christum hunc crucifixum disce ei cantare de teipso desperans dicere ei Tu Domine Jesu es justitia mea ego autem sum peccatum tuum tu assumpsisti meum dedisti mihi tuum assumpsisti quod non eras dedisti mihi quod non eram Ipse suscepit te peccata tua fecit sua suam justitiam fecit tuam maledictus qui haec non credit Epist. An. 1516. Tom. 1. If those who shew themselves now so quarrelsome almost about every word that is spoken concerning Christ and his Righteousness had ever been harrassed in their Consciences about the Guilt of sin as this man was they would think it no strange matter to speak and write as he did Yea some there are who have lived and died in the Communion of the Church of Rome it self that have given their Testimony unto this Truth So speaks Taulerus Meditat. vitae Christ. cap. 7. Christus omnia mundi peccata in se recepit tantumque pro illis ultro sibi assumpsit dolorem cordis ac si ipse ea perpetrasset Christ took upon him all the sins of the World and willingly underwent that grief of heart for them as if he himself had committed them And again speaking in the person of Christ. Quandoquidem peccatum Adae multum abire non potest obsecro te Pater Coelestis ut ipsum in me vindices Ego enim omnia illius peccata in me recipo Si haec irae tempestas propter me orta est mitte me in mare amarissimae passionis Whereas the great Sin of Adam cannot go away I beseech thee Heavenly Father punish it in me For I take all his sins upon my self If then this Tempest of Anger be risen for me cast me into the Sea of my most bitter passion See in the Justification of these Expressions Heb. 10.5 6 7 8 9 10. The Discourse of Albertus Pighius to this purpose though often cited and urged shall be once again repeated both for its Worth and Truth as also to let some men see how fondly they have pleased themselves in reflecting on some Expressions of mine as though I had been singular in them His words are after others to the same purpose Quoniam quidem inquit Apostolus Deus erat in Christo mundum reconcilians sibi non imputans hominibus sua delicta Et deposuit apud nos verbum reconciliationis In illa ergo justificamur coram Deo non in nobis non nostra sed illius justitia quae nobis cum illo jam communicantibus imputatur Propriae justitiae inopes extra nos in illo docemur justitiam quaerere Cum inquit qui peccatum non noverat pro nobis peccatum fecit hoc est hostiam peccati expiatricem ut nos efficeremur Justitia Dei in ipso non nostra sed Dei justitia justi efficimur in Christo quo jure Amicitiae quae communionem omnium inter amicos facit juxta vetus celebratissimum proverbium Christo insertis conglutinatis unitis sua nostra facit suas divitias nobis communicat suam justitiam inter Patris judicium nostram injustitiam interponit sub ea veluti sub umbone ac clypeo a divina quam commeruimus ira nos abscondit tuetur ac protegit imo eandem nobis impertit nostram facit qua tecti ornatique audacter secure jam divino nos sistamus Tribunali Judicio justique non solum appareamus sed etiam simus Quemadmodum enim unius delicto peccatores nos etiam factos affirmat Apostolus ita unius Christi justitiam in justificandis nobis omnibus efficacem esse Et sicut per inobedientiam unius hominis peccatores constituti sunt multi sic per Obedientiam unius justi inquit constituentur multi Haec est Christi justitia ejus Obedientia qua voluntatem Patris sui perfecit in omnibus sicut contra nostra injustitia est nostra inobedientia mandatorum Dei praevaricatio In Christi autem obedientia quod nostra collocatur justitia inde est quod nobis illi incorporatis ac si nostra esset accepta ea fertur ut ea ipsa etiam nos justi habeamur Et velut ille quondam Jacob quum nativitate primogenitus non esset sub habitu fratris occultatus atque ejus veste indutus quae odorem optimum spirabat seipsum insinuavit Patri ut sub aliena persona benedictionem primogeniturae acciperet Ita nos sub Christi primogeniti fratris nostri preciosa puritate delitescere bono ejus odore fragrare ejus perfectione vitia nostra sepeliri obtegi atque ita nos piissimo Patri ingerere ut justitiae benedictionem ab eodem assequamur necesse est And afterwards Justificat ergo nos Deus Pater bonitate sua gratuita quo nos in Christo complectitur dum eidem insertos innocentia justitia Christi nos induit quae una ut vera perfecta est quae Dei sustinere conspectum potest ita unum pro nobis sisti oportet Tribunali divini judicii veluti causae nostrae intercessorem eidem repraesentari qua subnixi etiam hic obtineremus remissionem peccatorum nostrorum assiduam cujus puritate velatae non imputantur nobis sordes nostrae imperfectionum immunditiae sed veluti sepultae conteguntur ne in judicium Dei veniant donec confecto in nobis plane extincto veteri homine divina bonitas nos in beatam pacem cum novo Adam recipiat God was in Christ saith the Apostle reconciling the world unto himself not imputing-unto men their sins In him therefore we are justified before God not in our selves not by our own but by his Righteousness which is imputed unto us now communicating with him Wanting Righteousness of our own we are taught to seek for Righteousness without our selves in
Arguments For 1 without the due consideration and supposition of it the true nature of Faith can never be understood For as we have shewed before Justification is Gods way of the Deliverance of the convinced sinner or one whose mouth is stopped and who is guilty before God obnoxious to the Law and shut up under Sin A sense therefore of this estate and all that belongs unto it is required unto Believing Hence Le Blanc who hath searched with some diligence into these things commends the Definition of Faith given by Mestrezat that it is the flight of a penitent sinner unto the mercy of God in Christ. And there is indeed more Sense and Truth in it than in twenty other that seem more accurate But without a supposition of the Conviction mentioned there is no understanding of this definition of Faith For it is that alone which puts the Soul upon a flight unto the mercy of God in Christ to be saved from the wrath to come Heb. 6.18 fled for Refuge 2 ly The Order Relation and use of the Law and the Gospel do uncontroulably evince the necessity of this Conviction previous unto Believing For that which any man hath first to deal withall with respect unto his Eternal Condition both naturally and by Gods Institution is the Law This is first presented unto the Soul with its Terms of Righteousness and Life and with its Curse in case of failure Without this the Gospel cannot be understood nor the Grace of it duely valued For it is the Revelation of Gods way for the relieving the Souls of men from the sentence and curse of the Law Rom. 1.17 That was the Nature that was the Use and End of the first Promise and of the whole work of Gods Grace revealed in all the ensuing Promises or in the whole Gospel Wherefore the Faith which we treat of being Evangelical that which in its especial nature and use not the Law but the Gospel requireth that which hath the Gospel for its Principle Rule and Object it is not required of us cannot be acted by us but on a supposition of the work and effect of the Law in the conviction of sin by giving the knowledge of it a sense of its Guilt and the state of the sinner on the Account thereof And that Faith which hath not respect hereunto we absolutely deny to be that Faith whereby we are justified Gal. 3.22 23 24. Rom. 10.4 3 ly This our Saviour himself directly teacheth in the Gospel For he calls unto him only those who are weary and heavy laden affirms that the whole have no need of the Physician but the sick and that he came not to call the Righteous but sinners to Repentance In all which he intends not those who were really sinners as all men are for he makes a difference between them offering the Gospel unto some and not unto others but such as were convinced of sin burdened with it and sought after deliverance So those unto whom the Apostle Peter proposed the Promise of the Gospel with the pardon of sin thereby as the Object of Gospel Faith were pricked to the Heart upon the conviction of their sin and cried what shall we do Act. 2.37 38 39. Such also was the state of the Jaylor unto whom the Apostle Paul proposed Salvation by Christ as what he was to believe for his Deliverance Act. 16.30 31. 4 ly The state of Adam and Gods dealing with him therein is the best Representation of the order and method of these things As He was after the Fall so are we by nature in the very same state and condition Really he was utterly lost by sin and convinced he was both of the nature of his sin and of the effects of it in that Act of God by the Law on his mind which is called the the opening of his Eyes For it was nothing but the communication unto his mind by his conscience of a sense of the nature guilt effects and consequents of sin which the Law could then teach him and could not do so before This fills him with shame and fear against the former whereof he provided by Figg-leaves and against the latter by hiding himself among the Trees of the Garden Nor however they may please themselves with them are any of the contrivances of men for freedom and safety from sin either wiser or more likely to have success In this condition God by an immediate Inquisition into the matter of fact sharpeneth this Conviction by the Addition of his own Testimony unto its Truth and casteth him actually under the Curse of the Law in a juridical denunciation of it In this lost forlorn hopeless condition God proposeth the Promise of Redemption by Christ unto him And this was the Object of that Faith whereby he was to be justified Although these things are not thus eminently and distinctly transacted in the minds and consciences of all who are called unto Believing by the Gospel yet for the substance of them and as to the previousness of the Conviction of sin unto Faith they are found in all that sincerely believe These things are known and for the substance of them generally agreed unto But yet are they such as being duely considered will discover the vanity and mistakes of many definitions of Faith that are obtruded on us For any definition or description of it which hath not express or at least virtual respect hereunto is but a deceit and no way answers the Experience of them that truly believe And such are all those who place it meerly in an Assent unto divine Revelation of what Nature soever that Assent be and whatever Effects are ascribed unto it For such an Assent there may be without any respect unto this work of the Law Neither do I to speak plainly at all value the most accurate Disputations of any about the Nature and Act of Justifying Faith who never had in themselves an Experience of the work of the Law in Conviction and Condemnation for sin with the Effects of it upon their Consciences or do omit the due consideration of their own Experience wherein what they truly believe is better stated than in all their Disputations That Faith whereby we are justified is in general the acting of the Soul towards God as revealing himself in the Gospel for deliverance out of this state and condition or from under the Curse of the Law applied unto the Conscience according to his mind and by the ways that he hath appointed I give not this as any definition of Faith but only express what hath a necessary influence into it whence the nature of it may be discerned 2. The Effects of this Conviction with their respect unto our Justification real or pretended may also be briefly considered And whereas this Conviction is a meer work of the Law it is not with respect unto these Effects to be considered alone but in conjunction with and under the conduct of that temporary Faith of the Gospel
And this must diligently be considered that by our regard by Faith unto the Blood the Sacrifice the Satisfaction of Christ we take off nothing from the free Grace Favour and Love of God 3. All those wherein the Wisdom of God in the contrivance of this way of Justification and Salvation is proposed unto us Ephes. 1.7 8. In whom we have Redemption through his blood the forgiveness of sins according to the Riches of his Grace wherein he hath abounded towards us in all Wisdom and Vnderstanding See chap. 3.10 11. 1 Cor. 1.24 The whole is comprized in that of the Apostle God was in Christ reconciling the World unto himself not imputing their Trespasses unto them 2 Cor. 5.19 All that is done in our Reconciliation unto God as unto the pardon of our sins and Acceptance with him unto Life was by the presence of God in his Grace Wisdom and Power in Christ designing and effecting of it Wherefore the Lord Christ proposed in the Promise of the Gospel as the Object of our Faith unto the Justification of Life is considered as the Ordinance of God unto that End Hence the Love the Grace and the Wisdom of God in the sending and giving of him are comprised in that Object and not only the Actings of God in Christ towards us but all his Actings towards the Person of Christ himself unto the same End belong thereunto So as unto his Death God set him forth to be a Propitiation Rom. 3.24 He spared him not but delivered him up for us all Rom. 8.32 And therein laid all our sins upon him Isa. 53.6 So he was raised for our Justification Rom. 4.25 And our Faith is in God who raised him from the dead Rom. 10.9 And in his Exaltation Act. 5.31 Which things compleat the record that God hath given of his Son 1 Joh. 5.10 11 12. The whole is confirmed by the Exercise of Faith in prayer which is the Souls Application of it self unto God for the participation of the Benefits of the Mediation of Christ. And it is called our Access through him unto the Father Eph. 2.18 Our coming through him unto the Throne of Grace that we may obtain Mercy and find Grace to help in time of need Heb. 4.15 16. and through him as both an High Priest and Sacrifice Heb. 10.19 20 21. So do we bow our Knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ Ephes. 3.14 This answereth the Experience of all who know what it is to pray We come therein in the name of Christ by him through his Mediation unto God even the Father to be through his Grace Love and Mercy made partakers of what he hath designed and promised to communicate unto poor sinners by him And this represents the compleat Object of our Faith The due Consideration of these things will reconcile and reduce into a perfect Harmony whatever is spoken in the Scripture concerning the Object of Justifying Faith or what we are said to believe therewith For whereas this is affirmed of sundry things distinctly they can none of them be supposed to be the entire adequate Object of Faith But consider them all in their Relation unto Christ and they have all of them their proper place therein namely the Grace of God which is the Cause the pardon of sin which is the Effect and the Promises of the Gospel which are the Means of communicating the Lord Christ and the benefits of his Mediation unto us The Reader may be pleased to take notice that I do in this place not only neglect but despise the late Attempt of some to wrest all things of this nature spoken of the Person and Mediation of Christ unto the Doctrine of the Gospel exclusively unto them and that not only as what is noisome and impious in it self but as that also which hath not yet been endeavoured to be proved with any Appearance of Learning Argument or Sobriety CHAP. II. The Nature of Justifying Faith THat which we shall now enquire into is the Nature of Justifying Faith or of Faith in that Act and Exercise of it whereby we are justified or whereon Justification according unto Gods Ordination and Promise doth ensue And the Reader is desired to take along with him a supposition of those things which we have already ascribed unto it as it is sincere Faith in general as also of what is required previously thereunto as unto its especial Nature Work and Duty in our Justification For we do deny that ordinarily and according unto the method of Gods proceeding with us declared in the Scripture wherein the Rule of our Duty is prescribed that any one doth or can truly believe with Faith unto Justification in whom the Work of Conviction before described hath not been wrought All Descriptions or Definitions of Faith that have not a respect thereunto are but vain speculations And hence some do give us such Definitions of Faith as it is hard to conceive that they ever asked of themselves what they do in their Believing on Jesus Christ for Life and Salvation The Nature of Justifying Faith with respect unto that Exercise of it whereby we are justified consisteth in the Hearts Approbation of the way of Justification and Salvation of sinners by Jesus Christ proposed in the Gospel as proceeding from the Grace Wisdom and Love of God with its Acquiescency therein as unto its own Concernment and Condition There needs no more for the Explanation of this Declaration of the Nature of Faith than what we have before proved concerning its Object and what may seem wanting thereunto will be fully supplied in the ensuing Confirmation of it The Lord Christ and his Mediation as the Ordinance of God for the Recovery Life and Salvation of sinners is supposed as the Object of this Faith And they are all considered as an Effect of Wisdom Grace Authority and Love of God with all their actings in and towards the Lord Christ himself in his susception and discharge of his Office Hereunto he constantly refers all that he did and suffered with all the Benefits redounding unto the Church thereby Hence as we observed before sometimes the Grace or Love or especial Mercy of God sometimes his actings in or towards the Lord Christ himself in sending him giving him up unto Death and raising him from the dead are proposed as the Object of our Faith unto Justification But they are so always with respect unto his Obedience and the Atonement that he made for sin Neither are they so altogether absolutely considered but as proposed in the Promises of the Gospel Hence a sincere Assent unto the divine Veracity in those Promises is included in this Approbation What belongs unto the Confirmation of this Description of Faith shall be reduced unto these four Heads 1 The Declaration of its contrary or the nature of privative unbelief upon the proposal of the Gospel For these things do mutually illustrate one another 2 The Declaration of the Design and End of God in and
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The doers of the Law shall be justified The place declares directly the nature of our Justification before God and puts the signification of the word out of question For Justification ensues as the whole effect of inherent Righteousness according unto the Law And therefore it is not the making of us Righteous which is irrefragable It is spoken of God Rom. 3.4 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That thou mayest be justified in thy sayings where to ascribe any other sense to the word is Blasphemy In like manner the same word is used and in the same signification 1 Cor. 4.4 1 Tim. 3.16 Rom. 3.20 26 28 30. Chap. 4.2 5. Chap. 5.1 9. Chap. 6.7 Chap. 8.30 Gal. 2.16 17. Chap. 3.11 24. Chap. 5.4 Tit. 3.7 Jam. 2.22 24 25. And in no one of these instances can it admit of any other signification or denote the making of any man Righteous by the infusion of an habit or principle of Righteousness or any internal mutation whatever It is not therefore in many places of Scripture as Bellarmine grants that the words we have insisted on do signifie the declaration or juridical pronuntiation of any one to be Righteous but in all places where they are used they are capable of no other but a Forensick sense especially is this evident where mention is made of Justification before God And because in my judgment this one consideration doth sufficiently defeat all the pretences of those of the Roman Church about the nature of Justification I shall consider what is excepted against the observation insisted on and remove it out of our way Lud. de Blanc In his Reconciliatory endeavours on this Article of Justification Thes. de usu acceptatione vocis Justificandi grants unto the Papists that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth in sundry places of the New Testament signifie to renew to sanctifie to infuse an habit of Holiness or Righteousness according as they plead And there is no reason to think but he hath grounded that concession on those instances which are most pertinent unto that purpose Neither is it to be expected that a better countenance will be given by any unto this concession then is given it by him I shall therefore examine all the instances which he insists upon unto this purpose and leave the determination of the difference unto the judgment of the Reader Only I shall premise that which I judge not an unreasonable demand namely That if the signification of the word in any or all the places which he mentions should seem doubtful unto any as it doth not unto me that the uncertainty of a very few places should not make us question the proper signification of a word whose sense is determined in so many wherein it is clear and unquestionable The first place he mentioneth is that of the Apostle Paul himself Rom. 8.30 Moreover whom he did predestinate them he also called and whom he called them he also justified and whom he justified them he also glorified The reason whereby he pleads that by justified in this place an internal work of inherent Holiness in them that are predestinated is designed is this and no other It is not saith he likely that the Holy Apostle in this enumeration of gracious Priviledges would omit the mention of our Sanctification by which we are freed from the service of sin and adorned with true internal Holiness and Righteousness But this is utterly omitted if it be not comprized under the name and title of being Justified For it is absurd with some to refer it unto the Head of Glorification Answ. 1 The Grace of Sanctification whereby our natures are spiritually washed purified and endowed with a principle of life Holiness and Obedience unto God is a Priviledge unquestionably great and excellent and without which none can be saved Of the same nature also is our Redemption by the Blood of Christ. And both these doth this Apostle in other places without number declare commend and insist upon But that he ought to have introduced the mention of them or either of them in this place seeing he hath not done so I dare not judge 2. If our Sanctification be included or intended in any of the Priviledges here expressed there is none of them Predestination only excepted but it is more probably to be reduced unto than unto that of being justified Indeed in Vocation it seems to be included expresly For whereas it is effectual Vocation that is intended wherein an Holy principle of spiritual life or Faith it self is communicated unto us our Sanctification radically and as the effect in its adaequate immediate cause is contained in it Hence we are said to be called to be Saints Rom. 1.7 which is the same with being Sanctified in Christ Jesus 1 Cor. 1.2 And in many other places is Sanctification included in Vocation 3. Whereas our Sanctification in the infusion of a principle of spiritual life and the actings of it unto an encrease in duties of Holiness Righteousness and Obedience is that whereby we are made meet for Glory and is of the same nature essentially with Glory it self whence its advances in us are said to be from Glory to Glory 2 Cor. 3.18 and Glory it self is called the Grace of life 1 Pet. 3.7 It is much more properly expressed by our being Glorified than by being Justified which is a Priviledge quite of another nature However it is evident that there is no reason why we should depart from the general use and signification of the Word no circumstance in the Text compelling us so to do The next place that he gives up unto this signification is 1 Cor. 6.11 Such were some of you but you are washed but ye are Sanctified but ye are Justified in the name of our Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God That by Justification here the infusion of an inherent principle of Grace making us inherently Righteous is intended he endeavoureth to prove by three Reasons 1 Because Justification is here ascribed unto the Holy Ghost ye are justified by the Spirit of our God But to renew us is the properwork of the Holy Spirit 2 It is manifest he says That by Justification the Apostle doth signifie some change in the Corinthians whereby they ceased to be what they were before For they were Fornicators and Drunkards such as could not inherit the Kingdom of God but now were changed which proves a real inherent work of Grace to be intended 3 If Justification here signifie nothing but to be absolved from the punishment of sin then the reasoning of the Apostle will be infirm and frigid For after he hath said that which is greater as heightning of it he addeth the less For it is more to be washed then merely to be freed from the punishment of sin Answ. 1. All these reasons prove not that it is the same to be Sanctified and to be Justified which must be if that be the sense of the latter
being supplied by some to comply with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that ensues And this phrase of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is peculiar unto this Apostle being no where used in the New Testament nor it may be in any other Author but by him And he useth it expresly 1 Epist. 2.29 and Chap. 3.7 where those words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 do plainly contain what is here expressed 2 To be justified as the word is rendred by the vulgar let him be justified more as it must be rendred if the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be retained respects an act of God which neither in its beginning nor continuation is prescribed unto us as a duty nor is capable of increase in degrees as we shall shew afterwards 3 Men are said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 generally from inherent Righteousness and if the Apostle had intended Justification in this place he would not have said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 All which things prefer the Complutensian Syriack and Arabick before the vulgar reading of this place If the vulgar reading be retained no more can be intended but that he who is Righteous should so proceed in working Righteousness as to secure his justified estate unto himself and to manifest it before God and the World Now whereas the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are used 36 times in the New Testament these are all the places whereunto any exception is put in against their Forensick signification And how ineffectual these exceptions are is evident unto any impartial Judge Some other Considerations may yet be made use of and pleaded to the same purpose Such is the opposition that is made between Justification and Condemnation So is it Isa. 50.8 9. Prov. 17.15 Rom. 5.16 18. Chap. 8.33 34. and in sundry other places as may be observed in the preceding enumeration of them Wherefore as Condemnation is not the infusing of an habit of wickedness into him that is condemned nor the making of him to be inherently wicked who was before Righteous but the passing a sentence upon a man with respect unto his wickedness no more is Justification the change of a person from inherent unrighteousness unto Righteousness by the infusion of a principle of Grace but a sentential Declaration of him to be Righteous Moreover the thing intended is frequently declared in the Scripture by other aequivalent terms which are absolutely exclusive of any such sense as the infusion of an habit of Righteousness So the Apostle expresseth it by the Imputation of Righteousness without Works Rom. 4.6 11. And calls it the Blessedness which we have by the pardon of sin and the covering of Iniquity in the same place So it is called Reconciliation with God Rom. 5.9 10. To be justified by the Blood of Christ is the same with being Reconciled by his Death Being now justified by his Blood we shall be saved from wrath by him For if when we were Enemies we were reconciled to God by the Death of his Son much more being reconciled we shall be saved by his life See 2 Cor. 5.20 21. Reconciliation is not the infusion of an habit of Grace but the effecting of peace and love by the removal of all enmity and causes of offence To save and Salvation are used to the same purpose He shall save his people from their sins Matth. 1.21 is the same with by him all that believe are justified from all things from which they could not be justified by the Law of Moses Act. 13.39 That of Gal. 2.16 We have believed that we might be justified by the Faith of Christ and not by the Works of the Law is the same with Act. 15.11 But we believe that through the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved even as they Ephes. 2.8 9. By Grace ye are saved through Faith and not of Works is so to be justified So it is expressed by pardon or the Remission of Sins which is the effect of it Rom. 4.5 6. By receiving the Atonement Chap. 5.11 not coming into Judgment or Condemnation Joh. 5.24 Blotting out sins and Iniquities Isa. 43.25 Psal. 51.9 Isa. 44.22 Jer. 18.23 Act. 3.19 Casting them into the bottom of the Sea Micah 7.19 and sundry other expressions of an alike importance The Apostle declaring it by its effects says 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Many shall be made Righteous Rom. 5.19 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who on a juridical Trial in open Court is absolved and declared Righteous And so it may be observed that all things concerning Justification are proposed in the Scripture under a juridical Scheme or Forensick Tryal and Sentence As 1 A judgment is supposed in it concerning which the Psalmist prays that it may not proceed on the terms of the Law Psal. 143.2 2 The Judge is God himself Isa. 50.7 8. Rom. 8.33 3 The Tribunal whereon God sits in Judgment is the Throne of Grace Heb. 4.16 Therefore will the Lord wait that he may be gracious unto you and therefore vvill he be exalted that he may have mercy upon you for the Lord is a God of Judgment Isa. 30.18 4 A Guilty person This is the Sinner who is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so guilty of sin as to be obnoxious to the Judgment of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 3.19 Chap. 1.32 whose mouth is stopped by Conviction 5 Accusers are ready to propose and promote the charge against the guilty person These are the Law Joh. 5.45 and Conscience Rom. 2.15 and Sathan also Zach. 3.2 Rev. 12.10 6 The Charge is admitted and drawn up into an Hand-vvriting in form of Law and is laid before the Tribunal of the Judge in Bar to the Deliverance of the Offender Col. 2.14 7 A Plea is prepared in the Gospel for the guilty person And this is Grace through the Blood of Christ the Ransome paid the Atonement made the Eternal Righteousness brought in by the Surety of the Covenant Rom. 3.23 24 25. Dan. 9.24 Eph. 1.7 8 Hereunto alone the Sinner betakes himself renouncing all other Apologies or defensatives whatever Psal. 130.2 3. Psal. 143.2 Job 9.2 3. Chap. 42.5 6 7. Luk. 18.13 Rom. 3.24 25. Chap. 5.11 16 17 18 19. Chap. 8.1 2 3. ver 32.33 Isa. 53.5 6. Heb. 9.13 14 15. Chap. 10.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13. 1 Pet. 2.24 1 Joh. 1.7 Other Plea for a Sinner before God there is none He who knoweth God and himself will not provide or betake himself unto any other Nor will he as I suppose trust unto any other defence were he sure of all the Angels in Heaven to plead for him 9 To make this Plea effectual we have an Advocate with the Father and he pleads his own propitiation for us 1 Joh. 2.1 2. 10 The Sentence hereon is Absolution on the account of the Ransome Blood or Sacrifice and Righteousness of Christ with Acceptation into favour as persons approved of God Job
Topicks of the name of God his Mercy Grace Faithfulness tender Compassion Covenant and Promises all manifested and exercised in and through the Lord Christ and his mediation alone Do they not herein place their only trust and confidence for this end that their Sins may be pardoned and their persons though every way unworthy in themselves be accepted with God Doth any other thought enter into their Hearts Do they plead their own Righteousness Obedience and Duties to this purpose Do they leave the prayer of the Publican and betake themselves unto that of the Pharisee And is it not of Faith alone which is that Grace whereby they apply themselves unto the Mercy or Grace of God through the mediation of Christ It is true that Faith herein worketh and acteth it self in and by Godly sorrow Repentance Humiliation Self-judging and Abhorrency Fervency in Prayer and Supplications with an humble waiting for an Answer of Peace from God with engagements unto renewed Obedience But it is Faith alone that makes Applications unto Grace in the Blood of Christ for the continuation of our justified Estate expressing it self in those other ways and effects mentioned from none of which a Believing Soul doth expect the Mercy aimed at 2. The Scripture expresly doth declare this to be the only way of the continuation of our Justification 1 Joh. 2.1 2. These things write I unto you that you sin not And if any man sin we have an Advocate with the Father Jesus Christ the Righteous and he is the Propitiation for our Sins It is required of those that are justified that they sin not it is their duty not to sin but yet it is not so required of them as that if in any thing they fail of their Duty they should immediately lose the Priviledge of their Justification Wherefore on a supposition of sin if any man sin as there is no man that liveth and sinneth not what way is prescribed for such persons to take what are they to apply themselves unto that their sin may be pardoned and their acceptance with God continued that is for the continuation of their Justification The course in this case directed unto by the Apostle is none other but the Application of our Souls by Faith unto the Lord Christ as our Advocate with the Father on the account of the Propitiation that he hath made for our Sins Under the consideration of this double Act of his Sacerdotal Office his Oblation and Intercession he is the Object of our Faith in our absolute Justification and so he is as unto the continuation of it So our whole progress in our justified Estate in all the degrees of it is ascribed unto Faith alone It is no part of our enquiry what God requireth of them that are justified There is no Grace no Duty for the substance of them nor for the manner of their performance that are required either by the Law or the Gospel but they are obliged unto them Where they are omitted we acknowledge that the Guilt of sin is contracted and that attended with such Aggravations as some will not own or allow to be confessed unto God himself Hence in particular the Faith and Grace of Believers do constantly and deeply exercise themselves in Godly sorrow Repentance Humiliation for sin and confession of it before God upon their Apprehensions of its Guilt And these Duties are so far necessary unto the continuation of our Justification as that a justified Estate cannot consist with the Sins and Vices that are opposite unto them So the Apostle affirms that if we live after the flesh we shall dye Rom. 8.13 He that doth not carefully avoid falling into the Fire or Water or other things immediately destructive of life natural cannot live But these are not the things whereon life doth depend Nor have the best of our Duties any other respect unto the continuation of our Justification but only as in them we are preserved from those things which are contrary unto it and destructive of it But the sole Question is upon what the continuation of our Justification doth depend not concerning what Duties are required of us in the way of our Obedience If this be that which is intended in this position the continuation of our Justification depends on our own Obedience and Good Works or that our own Obedience and Good Works are the Condition of the continuation of our Justification namely that God doth indispensably require Good Works and Obedience in all that are justified so that a justified estate is inconsistent with the neglect of them it is readily granted and I shall never contend with any about the way whereby they chuse to express the conceptions of their minds But if it be enquired what it is whereby we immediately concur in a way of Duty unto the continuation of our justified estate that is the pardon of our sins and acceptance with God we say it is such alone For the Just shall live by Faith Rom. 1.17 And as the Apostle applies this Divine Testimony to prove our first or absolute Justification to be by Faith alone So doth he also apply it unto the continuation of our Justification as that which is by the same means only Heb. 10.38 39. Now the Just shall live by Faith but if any man draw back my Soul shall have no pleasure in him But we are not of them that draw back unto perdition But of them that believe unto the saving of the Soul The drawing back to perdition includes the loss of a justified Estate really so or in Profession In opposition thereunto the Apostle placeth Believing unto the saving of the Soul that is unto the continuation of Justification unto the end And herein it is that the Just live by Faith and the loss of this life can only be by unbelief So the life which we now live in the flesh is by the Faith of the Son of God who loved us and gave himself for us Gal. 2.20 The life which we now lead in the flesh is the continuation of our Justification a life of Righteousness and Acceptation with God in opposition unto a life by the works of the Law as the next words declare ver 21. I do not frustrate the Grace of God for if Righteousness came by the Law then is Christ dead in vain and this life is by Faith in Christ as he loved us and gave himself for us that is as he was a Propitiation for our sins This then is the only way means and cause on our part of the preservation of this life of the continuance of our Justification and herein are we kept by the power of God through Faith unto Salvation Again if the continuation of our Justification dependeth on our own works of Obedience then is the Righteousness of Christ imputed unto us only with respect unto our Justification at first or our first Justification as some speak And this indeed is the Doctrine of the Roman School They teach that
unto the ultimate manifestation of Divine Glory in the Creation and Guidance of all things are sufficiently manifest And whence it appears how little force there is in that Argument which some pretend to be of so great weight in this cause As every one they say shall be judged of God at the last day in the same way and manner or on the same Ground is he justified of God in this life But by Works and not by Faith alone every one shall be judged at the last day Wherefore by Works and not by Faith alone every one is justified before God in this life For 1. It is no where said that we shall be judged at the last day ex operibus but only that God will render unto men secundum opera But God doth not justifie any in this life secundum opera Being justified freely by his Grace And not according to the Works of Righteousness which we have done And we are every where said to be justified in this life ex fide per fidem but no where propter fidem or that God justifieth us secundum fidem by Faith but not for our Faith nor according unto our Faith And we are not to depart from the expressions of the Scripture where such a difference is constantly observed 2. It is somewhat strange that a man should be judged at the last day and justified in this life just in the same way and manner that is with respect unto Faith and Works when the Scripture doth constantly ascribe our Justification before God unto Faith without Works and the Judgment at the last day is said to be according unto Works without any mention of Faith 3. If Justification and eternal Judgment proceed absolute-on the same Grounds Reasons and Causes then if men had not done what they shall be condemned for doing at the last day they should have been justified in this life But many shall be condemned only for sins against the light of nature Rom. 2.12 as never having the written Law or Gospel made known unto them Wherefore unto such persons to abstain from sins against the light of nature would be sufficient unto their Justification without any knowledge of Christ or the Gospel 4. This Proposition that God pardons men their Sins gives them the Adoption of Children with a right unto the Heavenly Inheritance according to their Works is not only foraign to the Gospel but contradictory unto it and destructive of it as contrary unto all express Testimonies of the Scripture both in the old Testament and the new where these things are spoken of But that God judgeth all men and rendreth unto all men at the last Judgment according unto their Works is true and affirmed in the Scripture 5. In our Justification in this life by Faith Christ is considered as our Propitiation and Advocate as he who hath made Atonement for sin and brought in everlasting Righteousness But at the last day and in the last Judgment he is considered only as the Judge 6. The end of God in our Justification is the Glory of his Grace Eph. 1.6 But the end of God in the last Judgment is the Glory of his remunerative Righteousness 2 Tim. 4.8 7. The Representation that is made of the final Judgment Math. 7. and Chap. 25. is only of the visible Church And therein the plea of Faith as to the profession of it is common unto all and is equally made by all Upon that plea of Faith it is put unto the trial whether it were sincere true Faith or no or only that which was dead and barren And this trial is made solely by the fruits and effects of it and otherwise in the publick declaration of things unto all it cannot be made Otherwise the Faith whereby we are justified comes not into Judgment at the last day See Joh. 5.24 with Mark 16.16 CHAP. VII Imputation and the Nature of it with the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ in particular THe first express Record of the Justification of any sinner is of Abraham Others were justified before him from the Beginning and there is that affirmed of them which sufficiently evidenceth them so to have been But this Prerogative was reserved for the Father of the Faithful that his Justification and the express way and manner of it should be first entered on the Sacred Record So it is Gen. 15.6 He believed in the Lord and it was counted unto him for Righteousness 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was accounted unto him or imputed unto him for Righteousness 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It was counted reckoned imputed And it was not written for his sake alone that it was imputed unto him but for us also unto whom it shall be imputed if we believe Rom. 4.23 24. Wherefore the first express Declaration of the nature of Justification in the Scripture affirms it to be by Imputation The Imputation of somewhat unto Righteousness And this done in that place and instance which is Recorded on purpose as the president and example of all those that shall be justified As he was justified so are we and no otherwise Under the new Testament there was a necessity of a more full and clear Declaration of the Doctrine of it For it is among the first and most principal parts of that Heavenly mystery of Truth which was to be brought to light by the Gospel And besides there was from the first a strong and Dangerous Opposition made unto it For this matter of Justification the Doctrine of it and what necessarily belongs thereunto was that whereon the Jewish Church broke off from God refused Christ and the Gospel perishing in their sins as is expresly declared Rom. 9.31 10.3 4. And in like manner a dislike of it an Opposition unto it ever was and ever will be a principle and cause of the Apostasie of any professing Church from Christ and the Gospel that falls under the power and deceit of them as it fell out afterwards in the Churches of the Galatians But in this state the Doctrine of Justification was fully declared stated and vindicated by the Apostle Paul in a peculiar manner And he doth it especially by affirming and proving that we have the Righteousness whereby and wherewith we are justified by Imputation or that our Justification consists in the non-Imputation of sin and the Imputation of Righteousness But yet although the first Recorded instance of Justification and which was so recorded that it might be an example and represent the Justification of all that should be justified unto the end of the World is expressed by Imputation and Righteousness imputed and the Doctrine of it in that great case wherein the eternal welfare of the Church of the Jews or their ruine was concerned is so expressed by the Apostle yet is it so fallen out in our days that nothing in Religion is more maligned more reproached more despised then the Imputation of Righteousness unto us or an Imputed Righteousness A putative Righteousness the
should answer for him Gen. 30.33 And we have an Instance of it in Gods dealing with men Psal. 106.31 Then stood up Phineas and executed Judgment and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness Notwithstanding it seemed that he had not sufficient warrant for what he did yet God that knew his heart and what Guidance of his own spirit he was under approved his fact as Righteous and gave him a Reward testifying that Approbation Concerning this Imputation it must be observed that whatever is our own antecedently thereunto which is an Act of God thereon can never be imputed unto us for any thing more or less than what it is really in it self For this Imputation consists of two parts or two things concur thereunto 1 A Judgment of the thing to be ours to be in us or to belong unto us 2 A Will of dealing with us or an actual dealing with us according unto it Wherefore in the Imputation of any thing unto us which is ours God esteemeth it not to be other than it is He doth not esteem that to be a perfect Righteousness which is imperfect so to do might argue either a mistake of the thing judged on or perverseness in the Judgment it self upon it Wherefore if as some say our own Faith and Obedience are imputed unto us for Righteousness seeing they are imperfect they must be imputed unto us for an imperfect Righteousness and not for that which is perfect For that Judgment of God which is according unto Truth is in this Imputation And the Imputation of an imperfect Righteousness unto us esteeming it only as such will stand us in little stead in this matter And the Acceptilation which some plead traducing a fiction in humane Laws to interpret the mystery of the Gospel doth not only overthrow all Imputation but the satisfaction and merit of Christ also And it must be observed that this Imputation is a meer Act of Justice without any mixture of Grace as the Apostle declares Rom. 11.6 For it consists of these two parts 1 An acknowledging and judging that to be in us which is truly so 2 A Will of dealing with us according unto it both which are Acts of Justice The Imputation unto us of that which is not our own antecedently unto that Imputation at least not in the same manner as it is afterwards is various also as unto the Grounds and Causes that it proceeds upon Only it must be observed that no Imputation of this kind is to account them unto whom any thing is imputed to have done the things themselves which are imputed unto them That were not to impute but to err in Judgment and indeed utterly to overthrow the whole nature of Gracious Imputation But it is to make that to be ours by Imputation which was not ours before unto all ends and purposes whereunto it would have served if it had been our own without any such Imputation It is therefore a manifest mistake of their own which some make the Ground of a Charge on the Doctrine of Imputation For the say if our sins were imputed unto Christ then must he be esteemed to have done what we have done amiss and so be the greatest sinner that ever was and on the other side if his Righteousness be imputed unto us then are we esteemed to have done what he did and so to stand in no need of the pardon of sin But this is contrary unto the nature of Imputation which proceeds on no such Judgment but on the contrary that we our selves have done nothing of what is imputed unto us nor Christ any thing of what was imputed unto him To declare more distinctly the nature of this Imputation I shall consider the several kinds of it or rather the several grounds whence it proceeds For this Imputation unto us of what is not our own antecedent unto that Imputation may be either 1 Ex justitia or 2 Ex voluntaria sponsione or 3 Ex injuria or 4 Ex gratia all which shall be exemplified I do not place them thus distinctly as if they might not some of them concur in the same Imputation which I shall manifest that they do But I shall refer the several kinds of Imputation unto that which is the next cause of every one 1. Things that are not our own originally personally inherently may yet be imputed unto us ex justitia by the Rule of Righteousness And this may be done upon a double Relation unto those whose they are 1 Foederal 2 Natural 1 Things done by one may be imputed unto others propter relationem foederalem because of a Covenant Relation between them So the sin of Adam was and is imputed unto all his Posterity as we shall afterwards more fully declare And the Ground hereof is that we stood all in the same Covenant with him who was our Head and Representative therein The corruption and Depravation of nature which we derive from Adam is imputed unto us with the first kind of Imputation namely of that which is ours antecedently unto that Imputation But his actual sin is imputed unto us as that which becomes ours by that Imputation which before it was not Hence saith Bellarmine himself Peccatum Adami ita posteris omnibus imputatur ac si omnes idem peccatum patravissent De Amiss Grat. lib. 4. cap. 10. The sin of Adam is so imputed unto all his Posterity as if they had all committed the same sin And he gives us herein the true nature of Imputation which he fiercely disputes against in his Books of Justification For the Imputation of that sin unto us as if we had committed it which he acknowledgeth includes both a Transcription of that sin unto us and a dealing with us as if we had committed it which is the Doctrine of the Apostle Rom. 5. 2. There is an Imputation of sin unto others ex justitia propter Relationem naturalem on the account of a natural Relation between them and those who had actually contracted the Guilt of it But this is so only with respect unto some outward Temporary effects of it So God speaks concerning the Children of the Rebellious Israelites in the Wilderness Your Children shall wander in the Wilderness Forty years and bear your Whoredoms Numb 14.33 Your sin shall be so far imputed unto your Children because of their Relation unto you and your Interest in them as that they shall suffer for them in an afflictive condition in the Wilderness And this was just because of the Relation between them as the same procedure of Divine Justice is frequently declared in other places of the Scripture So where there is a due foundation of it Imputation is an Act of Justice 2. Imputation may justly ensue ex voluntaria sponsione when one freely and willingly undertakes to answer for another An illustrious instance hereof we have in that passage of the Apostle unto Philemon in the behalf of Onesimus ver 18. If he have wronged the or oweth thee
ought 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 impute it unto me put it on my account He supposeth that Philemon might have a double Action against Onesimus 1 Injuriarum of wrongs 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if he hath dealt unjustly with the or by the if he hath so wronged the as to render himself obnoxious unto punishment 2 Damni or of loss 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if he oweth thee ought be a debtor unto the which made him liable to payment or restitution In this state the Apostle interposeth himself by a voluntary sponsion to undertake for Onesimus I Paul have written it with my own hand 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I Paul will answer for the whole And this he did by the Transcription of both the debts of Onesimus unto himself For the crime was of that nature as might be taken away by compurgation being not Capital And the Imputation of them unto him was made just by his voluntary undertaking of them Account me saith he the Person that hath done these things and I will make satisfaction so that nothing be charged on Onesimus So Judah voluntarily undertook unto Jacob for the safety of Benjamin and obliged himself unto perpetual Guilt in case of failure Gen. 43.9 I will be surety for him of my hand shalt thou require him if I bring him not unto the and set him before thee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will sin or be a sinner before thee always be guilty and as we say bear the blame So he expresseth himself again unto Joseph Chap. 44.32 It seems this is the nature and office of a Surety what he undertaketh for is justly to be required at his hand as if he had been originally and personally concerned in it And this voluntary sponsion was one ground of the Imputation of our sin unto Christ. He took on him the person of the whole Church that had sinned to answer for what they had done against God and the Law Hence that Imputation was fundamentaliter ex compacto ex voluntaria sponsione it had its foundation in his voluntary undertaking But on supposition hereof it was actually ex justitia it being Righteous that he should answer for and make good what he had so undertaken the Glory of Gods Righteousness and Holiness being greatly concerned herein 3. There is an Imputation ex injuria when that is laid unto the charge of any whereof he is not Guilty So Bathsheba says unto David it shall come to pass that when my Lord the King shall sleep with his Fathers that I and my Son Solomon shall be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sinners 1 Kings 1.21 shall be dealt with as Offenders as guilty persons have sin imputed unto us on one pretence or other unto our Destruction We shall be sinners be esteemed so and be dealt withal accordingly And we may see that in the Phrase of the Scripture the Denomination of sinners followeth the Imputation as well as the inhesion of sin which will give light unto that place of the Apostle he was made sin for us 2 Cor. 5.21 This kind of Imputation hath no place in the Judgment of God It is far from him that the Righteous should be as the Wicked 4. There is an Imputation ex mera Gratia of meer Grace and Favour And this is when that which antecedently unto this Imputation was no way ours not inherent in us not performed by us which we had no Right nor Title unto is granted unto us made ours so as that we are judged of and dealt with according unto it This is that Imputation in both branches of it Negative in the non-Imputation of sin and positive in the Imputation of Righteousness which the Apostle so vehemently pleads for and so frequently asserteth Rom. 4. For he both affirms the thing it self and declares that it is of meer Grace without respect unto any thing within our selves And if this kind of Imputation cannot be fully exemplified in any other instance but this alone whereof we treat it is because the foundation of it in the mediation of Christ is singular and that which there is nothing to parallel in any other case among men From what hath been discoursed concerning the nature and grounds of Imputation sundry things are made evident which contribute much light unto the truth which we plead for at least unto the right understanding and stating of the matter under debate As 1. The Difference is plain between the Imputation of any works of our own unto us and the Imputation of the Righteousness of Faith without works For the Imputation of works unto us be they what they will be it Faith it self as a work of Obedience in us is the Imputation of that which was ours before such Imputation But the Imputation of the Righteousness of Faith or the Righteousness of God which is by Faith is the Imputation of that which is made ours by vertue of that Imputation And these two Imputation differ in their whole kind The one is a judging of that to be in us which indeed is so and is ours before that judgment be passed concerning it the other is a Communication of that unto us which before was not ours And no man can make sense of the Apostles discourse that is he cannot understand any thing of it if he acknowledge not that the Righteousness he treats of is made ours by Imputation and was not ours antecedently thereunto 2. The Imputation of works of what sort soever they be of Faith it self as a work and all the Obedience of Faith is ex justitia and not ex gratia of Right and not of Grace However the bestowing of Faith on us and the working of Obedience in us may be of Grace yet the Imputation of them unto us as in us and as ours is an act of Justice For this Imputation as was shewed is nothing but a Judgment that such and such things are in us or are ours which truly and really are so with a treating of us according unto them This is an Act of Justice as it appears in the Description given of that Imputation But the Imputation of Righteousness mentioned by the Apostle is as unto us ex mera Gratia of meer Grace as he fully declares 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And moreover he declares that these two sorts of Imputation are inconsistent and not capable of any composition so that any thing should be partly of the one and partly of the other Rom. 11.6 If by Grace then it is no more of works otherwise Grace is no more Grace but if it be of works then it is no more Grace otherwise works is no more works For instance if Faith it self as a work of ours be imputed unto us it being ours antecedently unto that Imputation it is but an acknowledgment of it to be in us and ours with an ascription of it unto us for what it is For the ascription of any thing unto us for what it is not is no Imputation but
is allowed unless we grant it self to be imputed nor can we have any Participation of the effects of it but on the supposition and foundation of that Imputation The impertinent Cavils that some of late have collected from the Papists and Socinians that if it be so then are we as Righteous as Christ himself that we have redeemed the World and satisfied for the sins of others that the pardon of sin is impossible and Personal Righteousness needless shall afterwards be spoken unto so far as they deserve All that we now aim to demonstrate is only that either the Righteousness of Christ it self is imputed unto us or there is no Imputation in the matter of our Justification which whether there be or no is another Question afterwards to be spoken unto For as was said the effects of the Righteousness of Christ cannot be said properly to be imputed unto us For Instance Pardon of sin is a great effect of the Righteousness of Christ. Our sins are pardoned on the account thereof God for Christs sake forgiveth us all our sins But the pardon of sin cannot be said to be imputed unto us nor is so Adoption Justification Peace with God all Grace and Glory are effects of the Righteousness of Christ. But that these things are not imputed unto us nor can be so is evident from their Nature But we are made Partakers of them all upon the account of the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto us and no otherwise Thus much may suffice to be spoken of the Nature of Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ the Grounds Reasons and Causes whereof we shall in the next place enquire into And I doubt not but we shall find in our Enquiry that it is no such figment as some Ignorant of these things do imagine but on the contrary an Important Truth immixed with the most fundamental Principles of the mystery of the Gospel and inseparable from the Grace of God in Christ Jesus CHAP. VIII Imputation of the sins of the Church unto Christ. Grounds of it The Nature of his Suretyship Causes of the New Covenant Christ and the Church one mystical Person Consequents thereof THose who believe the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto Believers for the Justification of Life do also unanimously profess that the sins of all Believers were imputed unto Christ. And this they do on many Testimonies of the Scripture directly witnessing thereunto some whereof shall be pleaded and vindicated afterwards At present we are only on the consideration of the general notion of these things and the Declaration of the nature of what shall be proved afterwards And in the first place we shall enquire into the foundation of this Dispensation of God and the Equity of it or the Grounds whereinto it is resolved without an understanding whereof the thing it self cannot be well apprehended The principal Foundation hereof is that Christ and the Church in this Design were one mystical Person which state they do actually coalesce in through the uniting Efficacy of the Holy Spirit He is the Head and Believers are the members of that one Person as the Apostle declares 1 Cor. 12.12 13. Hence as what he did is imputed unto them as if done by them so what they deserved on the Account of sin was charged upon him So is it expressed by a Learned Prelate Nostram causam sustinebat qui nostram sibi Carnem aduniverat ita nobis arctissimo vinculo conjunctus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quae erant nostra fecit sua And again Quid mirum si in nostra persona constitutus nostram carnem indutus c. Môntacut Origin Ecclesiast The Antients speak to the same purpose Leo. Serm. 17. Ideo se humanae infirmitati virtus divina conseruit ut dum Deus sua facit esse quae nostra sunt nostra faceret esse quae sua sunt And also Sermo 16. Caput nostrum Dominus Jesus Christus omnia in se corporis sui membra transformans quod olim in Psalmo eructaverat id in supplicio crucis sub Redemptorum suorum voce clamavit And so speaks Augustine to the same purpose Epist. 120. ad Honoratum Audimus vocem corporis ex ore capitis Ecclesia in illo patiebatur quando pro Ecclesia patiebatur c. We hear the voice of the Body from the mouth of the Head The Church suffered in him when he suffered for the Church as he suffers in the Church when the Church suffereth for him For as we have heard the voice of the Church in Christ-suffering my God my Lord why hast thou forsaken me look upon me so we have heard the voice of Christ in the Church-suffering Saul Saul why persecutest thou me But we may yet look a little backward and farther into the sense of the antient Church herein Christus saith Irenaeus omnes Gentes exinde ab Adam disper sas Generationem hominum in semet ipso recapitulatus est unde a Paulo Typus futuri dictus est ipse Adam lib. 3. cap. 33. And again Recapitulans universum hominum genus in se ab initio usque ad finem recapitulatus est mortem ejus In this of Recapitulation there is no doubt but he had respect unto the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mentioned Ephes. 1.10 And it may be this was that which Origen intended aenigmatically by saying the Soul of the first Adam was the Soul of Christ as it is charged on him And Cyprian Epist. 63. on bearing about the Administration of the Sacrament of the Eucharist nos omnes portabat Christus qui peccata nostra portabat He bare us or suffered in our person when he bare our sins Whence Athanasius affirms of the voice he used on the Cross 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We suffered in him Eusebius speaks many things to this purpose Demonstrat Evangel lib. 10. cap. 1. Expounding those words of the Psalmist Heal my Soul for or as he would read them if I have sinned against thee and applying them unto our Saviour in his sufferings He saith thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because he took of our sins to himself communicated our sins to himself making them his own For so he adds 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 making our sins his own And because in his following words he fully expresseth what I design to prove I shall transcribe them at large 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I have transcribed this passage at large because as I said what I intend to prove in the present discourse is declared fully therein Thus therefore he speaks How then did he make our sins to be his own and how did he bear our Iniquities Is it not from thence that we are said to be his Body as the Apostle speaks You are the Body of Christ and members for your part or of one another and as when one member suffers all the members do suffer so the many members sinning and suffering He according unto the Laws of
or that we may be interessed in it that it may be made ours which is all we contend for And this is our actual coalescency into one mystical person with him by Faith Hereon doth the necessity of Faith originally depend And if we shall add hereunto the necessity of it likewise unto that especial Glory of God which he designs to exalt in our Justification by Christ as also unto all the ends of our Obedience unto God and the Renovation of our Natures into his Image its station is sufficiently secured against all Objections Our actual Interest in the satisfaction of Christ depends on our actual Insertion into his mystical Body by Faith according to the Appointment of God 4 thly It is yet objected That if the Righteousness of Christ be made ours we may be said to be Saviours of the World as he was or to save others as he did For he was so and did so by his Righteousness and no otherwise This Objection also is of the same nature with those foregoing a meer Sophistical Cavil For 1. The Righteousness of Christ is not transfused into us so as to be made inherently and subjectively ours as it was in him and which is necessarily required unto that effect of saving others thereby Whatever we may do or be said to do with respect unto others by virtue of any power or quality inherent in our selves we can be said to do nothing unto others or for them by virtue of that which is imputed unto us only for our own benefit That any Righteousness of ours should benefit another it is absolutely necessary that it should be wrought by our selves 2. If the Righteousness of Christ could be transfused into us and be made inherently ours yet could we not be nor be said to be the Saviours of others thereby For our nature in our individual persons is not subjectum capax or capable to receive and retain a Righteousness useful and effectual unto that end This capacity was given unto it in Christ by virtue of the Hypostatical Vnion and no otherwise The Righteousness of Christ himself as performed in the Humane Nature would not have been sufficient for the Justification and Salvation of the Church had it not been the Righteousness of his Person who is both God and Man for God redeemed his Church with his own Blood 3. This Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto us as unto its ends and use hath its measure from the Will of God and his purpose in that Imputation And this is that it should be the Righteousness of them unto whom it is imputed and nothing else 4. We do not say that the Righteousness of Christ as made absolutely for the whole Church is imputed unto every Believer But his satisfaction for every one of them in particular according unto the Will of God is imputed unto them not with respect unto its general ends but according unto every ones particular Interest Every Believer hath his own Homer of this Bread of Life and all are justified by the same Righteousness The Apostle declares as we shall prove afterwards that as Adams actual sin is imputed unto us unto condemnation so is the Obedience of Christ imputed unto us to the Justification of life But Adams sin is not so imputed unto any person as that he should then and thereby be the cause of sin and condemnation unto all other persons in the World but only that he himself should become Guilty before God thereon And so is it on the other side And as we are made Guilty by Adams actual sin which is not inherent in us but only imputed unto us so are we made Righteous by the Righteousness of Christ which is not inherent in us but only imputed unto us And imputed unto us it is because himself was Righteous with it not for himself but for us It is yet said That if we insist on personal Imputation unto every Believer of what Christ did or if any Believer be personally Righteous in the very individual Acts of Christs Righteousness many Absurdities will follow But it was observed before that when any design to oppose an Opinion from the absurdities which they suppose would follow upon it they are much enclined so to state it as that at least they may seem so to do And this oftimes the most worthy and candid Persons are not free from in the heat of Disputation So I fear it is here fallen out For as unto personal Imputation I do not well understand it All Imputation is unto a person and is the Act of a person be it of what and what sort it will but from neither of them can be denominated a Personal Imputation And if an Imputation be allowed that is not unto the persons of men namely in this case unto all Believers the nature of it hath not yet been declared as I know of That any have so expressed the Imputation pleaded for That every Believer should be personally Righteous in the very individual Acts of Christs Righteousness I know not I have neither read nor heard any of them who have so expressed their mind It may be some have done so but I shall not undertake the defence of what they have done For it seems not only to suppose that Christ did every individual Act which in any instance is required of us but also that those Acts are made our own inherently both which are false and impossible That which indeed is pleaded for in this Imputation is only this That what the Lord Christ did and suffered as the Mediator and Surety of the Covenant in answer unto the Law for them and in their stead is imputed unto every one of them unto the Justification of Life And sufficient this is unto that end without any such supposals 1 From the Dignity of the Person who yielded his Obedience which rendered it both satisfactory and meritorious and imputable unto many 2 From the Nature of the Obedience it self which was a perfect compliance with a fulfilling of and satisfaction unto the whole Law in all its demands This on the supposition of that Act of Gods Soveraign Authority whereby a Representative of the whole Church was introduced to answer the Law is the Ground of his Righteousness being made theirs and being every way sufficient unto their Justification 3 From the constitution of God that what was done and suffered by Christ as a publick person and our surety should be reckoned unto us as if done by our selves So the sin of Adam whilst he was a publick Person and represented his whole Posterity is imputed unto us all as if we had committed that actual sin This Bellarmin himself frequently acknowledgeth Peccavimus in primo homine quando ille peccavit illa ejus praevaricatio nostra etiam praevaricatio fuit Non enim vere per Adami inobedientiam constitueremur peccatores nisi inobedientia illius nostra etiam inobedientia esset De Amiss Grat. Stat. Peccat lib.
〈◊〉 I Paul have written it with my own hand that he would answer for both and pay back a valuable consideration if required Hereby was he obliged in his own person to make satisfaction unto Philemon but yet he was to do it for Onesimus and not for himself Whatever Obedience therefore was due from the Lord Christ as to his Humane Nature whilest in the form of a servant either as a Man or as an Israelite seeing he was so not necessarily by the necessity of nature for himself but by voluntary condescension and stipulation for us for us it was and not for himself 5. The Lord Christ in his Obedience was not a private but a publick person He obeyed as he was the Surety of the Covenant as the Mediator between God and Man This I suppose will not be denied He can by no imagination be considered out of that capacity But what a publick person doth as a publick person that is as a Representative of others and an undertaker for them whatever may be his own concernment therein he doth it not for himself but for others And if others were not concerned therein if it were not for them what he doth would be of no use or signification Yea it implies a contradiction that any one should do any thing as a publick person and do it for himself only He who is a publick person may do that wherein he alone is concerned but he cannot do so as he is a publick person Wherefore as Socinus and those that follow him would have Christ to have offered for himself which is to make him a Mediator for himself his offering being a Mediatory act which is both foolish and impious so to affirm his Mediatory Obedience his Obedience as a publick person to have been for himself and not for others hath but little less of impiety in it 6. It is granted That the Lord Christ having an Humane Nature which was a Creature it was impossible but that it should be subject unto the Law of Creation For there is a Relation that doth necessarily arise from and depend upon the Beings of a Creator and a Creature Every rational Creature is eternally obliged from the Nature of God and its Relation thereunto to love him obey him depend upon him submit unto him and to make him its End Blessedness and Reward But the Law of Creation thus considered doth not respect the World and this life only but the future state of Heaven and Eternity also And this Law the Humane Nature of Christ is subject unto in Heaven and Glory and cannot but be so whilest it is a Creature and not God that is whilest it hath its own Being Nor do any Men fancy such a transfusion of divine properties into the Humane Nature of Christ as that it should be self-subsisting and in it self absolutely immense for this would openly destroy it Yet none will say that he is now 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 under the Law in the sense intended by the Apostle But the Law in the sense described the Humane Nature of Christ was subject unto on its own account whilest he was in this World And this is sufficient to answer the Objection of Socinus mentioned at the entrance of this Discourse namely That if the Lord Christ were not obliged unto Obedience for himself then might he if he would neglect the whole Law or infringe it For besides that it is a foolish imagination concerning that holy thing which was hypostatically united unto the Son of God and thereby rendered incapable of any deviation from the Divine Will the eternal indispensible Law of Love Adherence and Dependance on God under which the Humane Nature of Christ was and is as a Creature gives sufficient security against such Suppositions But there is another consideration of the Law of God namely as it is imposed on Creatures by especial dispensation for some time and for some certain end with some Considerations Rules and Orders that belong not essentially unto the Law as before described This is the nature of the Written Law of God which the Lord Christ was made under not necessarily as a Creature but by especial dispensation For the Law under this consideration is presented unto us as such not absolutely and eternally but whilest we are in this World and that with this especial end that by Obedience thereunto we may obtain the reward of Eternal Life And it is evident that the Obligation of the Law under this consideration ceaseth when we come to the injoyment of that Reward It obligeth us no more formally by its command Do this and live when the life promised is injoyed In this sense the Lord Christ was not made subject unto the Law for himself nor did yield obedience unto it for himself For he was not obliged unto it by virtue of his created condition Upon the first instant of the Vnion of his natures being holy harmless undefiled and separate from sinners he might notwithstanding the Law that he was made subject unto have been stated in Glory For he that was the object of all Divine Worship needed not any new Obedience to procure for him a state of Blessedness And had he naturally meerly by virtue of his being a Creature been subject unto the Law in this sense he must have been so eternally which he is not For those things which depend solely on the Natures of God and the Creature are eternal and immutable Wherefore as the Law in this sense was given unto us not absolutely but with respect unto a future state and reward so the Lord Christ did voluntarily subject himself unto it for us and his Obedience thereunto was for us and not for himself These things added unto what I have formerly written on this subject whereunto nothing hath been opposed but a few impertinent cavils are sufficient to discharge the first part of that charge laid down before concerning the impossibility of the Imputation of the Obedience of Christ unto us which indeed is equal unto the Impossibility of the Imputation of the Disobedience of Adam unto us whereby the Apostle tells us That we were all made sinners The second part of the Objection or Charge against the Imputation of the Obedience of Christ unto us is That it is useless unto the persons that are to be justified For whereas they have in their Justification the pardon of all their sins they are thereby righteous and have a right or title unto Life and Blessedness For he who is so pardoned as not to be esteemed guilty of any sin of omission or commission wants nothing that is requisite thereunto For he is supposed to have done all that he ought and to have omitted nothing required of him in a way of duty Hereby he becomes not unrighteous and to be not unrighteous is the same as to be righteous As he that is not dead is alive Neither is there nor can there be any middle state between Death and life Wherefore
acquit the sinner upon his tryal But pardon on a juridical tryal on what consideration soever it be granted gives no right nor title unto any favor benefit or priviledge but only meer deliverance It is one thing to be acquitted before the Throne of a King of Crimes laid unto the charge of any Man which may be done by clemency or on other considerations another to be made his Son by Adoption and Heir unto his Kingdom And these things are represented unto us in the Scripture as distinct and depending on distinct causes So are they in the Vision concerning Joshua the High Priest Zech. 3.4 5 And he answered and spake unto those that stood before him saying Take away the filthy garments from him And unto him he said Behold I have caused thine iniquity to pass from thee and I will cloath thee with change of rayment And I said Let them set a fair Miter upon his Head so they set a fair Miter on his Head and cloathed him with garments It hath been generally granted That we have here a Representation of the Justification of a sinner before God And the taking away of filthy garments is expounded by the passing away of iniquity When a Mans filthy garments are taken away he is no more defiled with them but he is not thereby cloathed This is an additional grace and favor thereunto namely to be cloathed with change of garments And what this rayment is is declared Isa. 61.10 He hath cloathed me with the garments of Salvation he hath covered me with the robe of Righteousness which the Apostle alludes unto Phil. 3.9 Wherefore these things are distinct namely the taking away of the filthy garments and the cloathing of us with change of rayment or the pardon of sin and the robe of Righteousness by the one are we freed from Condemnation by the other have we right unto Salvation And the same is in like manner represented Ezek. 16.6 7 8 9 10 11 12. This place I had formerly urged to this purpose about Communion with God p. 187. which Mr. Hotch in his usual manner attempts to answer And to omit his reviling expressions with the crude unproved assertion of his own conceits his answer is That by the change of rayment mentioned in the Prophet our own personal righteousness is intended For he acknowledgeth that our Justification before God is here represented And so also he expounds the place produced in the confirmation of the Exposition given Isai. 61.10 where this change of rayment is called The garments of Salvation and the robe of Righteousness and thereon affirms That our Righteousness it self before God is our Personal Righteousness p. 203. That is in our Justification before him which is the only thing in question To all which Presumptions I shall oppose only the testimony of the same Prophet which he may consider at his leisure and which at one time or other he will subscribe unto Chap. 64.6 We are all as an unclean thing and all our Righteousnesses are as filthy rags He who can make garments of Salvation and robes of Righteousness of these filthy rags hath a skill in composing Spiritual Vestments that I am not acquainted withal What remains in the Chapter wherein this Answer is given unto that testimony of the Scripture I shall take no notice of it being after his accustomed manner only a perverse wresting of my words unto such a sense as may seem to countenance him in casting a reproach upon my self and others There is therefore no force in the comparing of these things unto life and death natural which are immediately opposed So that he who is not dead is alive and he who is alive is not dead there being no distinct state between that of life and death For these things being of different natures the comparison between them is no way argumentative Though it may be so in things natural it is otherwise in things Moral and Political where a proper Representation of Justification may be taken as it is forensick If it were so that there is no difference between being acquitted of a crime at the Bar of a Judge and a Right unto a Kingdom nor different state between these things it would prove that there is no intermediate estate between being pardoned and having a Right unto the Heavenly Inheritance But this is a fond imagination It is true That Right unto Eternal Life doth succeed unto freedom from the guilt of Eternal Death That they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among them that are sanctified But it doth not so do out of a necessity in the nature of the things themselves but only in the free constitution of God Believers have the pardon of sin and an immediate Right and Title unto the favor of God the Adoption of Sons and Eternal Life But there is another state in the nature of the things themselves and this might have been so actually had it so seemed good unto God For who sees not that there is a Status or Conditio Personae wherein he is neither under the guilt of Condemnation nor hath an immediate Right and Title unto Glory in the way of Inheritance God might have pardoned Men all their sins past and placed them in a state and condition of seeking Righteousness for the future by the Works of the Law that so they might have lived For this would answer the original state of Adam But God hath not done so true but whereas he might have done so it is evident that the disposal of Men into this state and condition of Right unto Life and Salvation doth not depend on nor proceed from the pardon of sin but hath another cause which is the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto us as he fulfilled the Law for us And in truth this is the opinion of the most of our Adversaries in this cause For they do contend that over and above the remission of sin which some of them say is absolute without any respect unto the merit or satisfaction of Christ others refer it unto them they all contend that there is moreover a Righteousness of Works required unto our Justification only they say this is our own incomplete imperfect Righteousness imputed unto us as if it were perfect that is for what it is not and not the Righteousness of Christ imputed unto us for what it is From what hath been discoursed it is evident that unto our Justification before God is required Not only that we be freed from the damnatory sentence of the Law which we are by the pardon of sin but moreover that the Righteousness of the Law be fulfilled in us or that we have a Righteousness answering the Obedience that the Law requires whereon our acceptance with God through the riches of his Grace and our Title unto the heavenly Inheritance do depend This we have not in and of our selves nor can attain unto as hath been proved Wherefore the perfect Obedience and
Righteousness of Christ is imputed unto us or in the sight of God we can never be Justified Nor are the cavilling Objections of the Socinians and those that follow them of any force against the Truth herein They tell us that the Righteousness of Christ can be imputed but unto one if unto any For who can suppose that the same Righteousness of One should become the Righteousness of many even of all that believe Besides he performed not all the Duties that are required of us in all our Relations he being never placed in them These things I say are both foolish and impious destructive unto the whole Gospel For all things here depend on the Ordination of God It is his Ordinance that as through the offence of One many are dead so his Grace and the Gift of Grace through one man Christ Jesus hath abounded unto many and as by the Offence of one Judgment came upon all men unto Condemnation so by the Righteousness of One the free Gift came upon all unto the Righteousness of life and by the Obedience of One many are made Righteous as the Apostle argues Rom. 5. For God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin that the Righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us Rom. 8.3 4. For he was the End of the Law the whole End of it for Righteousness unto them that do believe Chap. 10.4 This is the Appointment of the Wisdom Righteousness and Grace of God that the whole Righteousness and Obedience of Christ should be accepted as our compleat Righteousness before him imputed unto us by his Grace and applied unto us or made ours through believing and consequently unto all that believe And if the actual Sin of Adam be imputed unto us all who derive our Nature from him unto Condemnation though he sinned not in our Circumstances and Relations is it strange that the actual Obedience of Christ should be imputed unto them who derive a Spiritual Nature from him unto the Justification of life Besides both the Satisfaction and Obedience of Christ as relating unto his person were in some sense infinite that is of an infinite Value and so cannot be considered in Parts as though one Part of it were imputed unto one and another unto another but the whole is imputed unto every one that doth believe And if the Israelites could say that David was worth ten thousand of them 2 Sam. 21.3 we may well allow the Lord Christ and so what he did and suffered to be more than us all and all that we can do and suffer There are also sundry other mistakes that concur unto that part of the Charge against the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto us which we have now considered I say of his Righteousness for the Apostle in this case useth those two words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Righteousness and Obedience as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same signification Rom. 5.18 19. such are those that Remission of Sin and Justification are the same or that Justification consisteth only in the Remission of Sin that Faith it self as our Act and Duty being it is the Condition of the Covenant is imputed unto us for Righteousness or that we have a personal inherent Righteousness of our own that one way or other is our Righteousness before God unto Justification either a Condition it is or a Disposition unto it or hath a congruity in deserving the Grace of Justification or a down-right merit of Condignity thereof For all these are but various expressions of the same thing according unto the Variety of the Conceptions of the Minds of men about it But they have been all considered and removed in our precedent Discourses To close this Argument and our Vindication of it and therewithal to obviate an Objection I do acknowledg that our Blessedness and life eternal is in the Scripture oftimes ascribed unto the death of Christ But it is so 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the principal Cause of the whole and as that without which no imputation of Obedience could have justified us for the Penalty of the Law was indispensibly to be undergone 2. It is so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not exclusively unto all Obedience whereof mention is made in other Places but as that whereunto it is inseparably conjoyned Christus in vita passivam habuit actionem in morte passionem activam sustinuit dum salutem operaretur in medio terrae Bernard And so it is also ascribed unto his Resurrection 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with respect unto Evidence and Manifestation But the Death of Christ exclusively as unto his Obedience is no where asserted as the Cause of eternal life comprizing that exceeding Weight of Glory wherewith it is accompanied Hitherto we have treated of and Vindicated the Imputation of the Active Obedience of Christ unto us as the Truth of it was deduced from the preceding Argument about the Obligation of the Law of Creation I shall now briefly confirm it with other Reasons and Testimonies 1. That which Christ the Mediator and Surety of the Covenant did do in Obedience unto God in the discharge and Performance of his Office that he did for us and that is imputed unto us This hath been proved already and it hath too great an Evidence of Truth to be denied He was born to us given to us Isa. 9.6 For what the Law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin condemned sin in the flesh that the Righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us Rom. 8.3 4. Whatever is spoken of the Grace Love and Purpose of God in sending or giving his Son or of the Love Grace and Condescention of the Son in coming and undertaking of the Work of Redemption designed unto him or of the Office it self of a Mediator or Surety gives Testimony unto this Assertion Yea it is the Fundamental Principle of the Gospel and of the Faith of all that truly believe As for those by whom the Divine Person and Satisfaction of Christ are denied whereby they evert the whole Work of his Mediation we do not at present consider them Wherefore what he so did is to be enquired into And 1. The Lord Christ our Mediator and Surety was in his Humane Nature made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 under the Law Gal. 4.1 That he was not so for himself by the necessity of his Condition we have proved before It was therefore for us But as made under the Law he yielded Obedience unto it this therefore was for us and is imputed unto us The exception of the Socinians that it is the Judicial Law only that is intended is too frivolous to be insisted on For he was made under that Law whose Curse we are delivered from And if we are delivered only from the Curse of the Law of Moses wherein they contend that there
believe is represented in the words of the Apostle He doth therefore use his utmost endeavor to wrest and deprave them And yet although most of his Artifices are since traduced into the Annotations of others upon the place he himself produceth nothing material but what is taken out of Origen and the Comment of Pelagius on this Epistle which is extant in the Works of Jerome and was urged before him by Erasmus The substance of what he pleads for is That the actual transgression of Adam is not imputed unto his posterity nor a depraved nature from thence communicated unto them Only whereas he had incurred the penalty of death all that derive their nature from him in that condition are rendred subject unto death also And as for that corruption of nature which is in us or a proneness unto sin it is not derived from Adam but is an habit contracted by many continued acts of our own So also on the other hand that the Obedience or Righteousness of Christ is not imputed unto us Only when we make our selves to become his Children by our obedience unto him he having obtained eternal life for himself by his obedience unto God we are made partakers of the benefits thereof This is the substance of his long Disputation on this subject De Servator lib. 4. cap. 6. But this is not to expound the words of the Apostle but expresly to contradict them as we shall see in the insuing consideration of them I intend not an Exposition of the whole discourse of the Apostle but only of those passages in it which evidently declare the way and manner of our Justification before God A comparison is here proposed and pursued between the First Adam by whom sin was brought into the World and the Second Adam by whom it is taken away And a comparison it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of things contrary wherein there is a similitude in some things and a dissimilitude in others both sorts illustrating the truth declared in it The general Proposition of it is contained in Ver. 12. As by one Man sin entred into the World and death by sin and so death passed on all Men for that all have sinned The entrance of sin and punishment into the World was by one Man and that by one sin as he afterward declares Yet were they not confined unto the person of that one Man but belonged equally unto all This the Apostle expresseth inverting the order of the Effect and Cause In the entrance of it he first mentions the cause or sin and then the effect or punishment By one Man sin entred into the World and Death by sin But in the Application of it unto all Men he expresseth first the effect and then the cause Death passed on all Men for that all had sinned Death on the first entrance of sin passed on all that is all Men became liable and obnoxious unto it as the punishment due to sin All Men that ever were are or shall be were not then existent in their own persons But yet were they all of them then upon the first entrance of sin made subject to death or liable unto punishment They were so by vertue of Divine Constitution upon their foederal existence in the one Man that sinned And actually they became obnoxious in their own persons unto the sentence of it upon their first natural existence being born children of wrath It is hence manifest what sin it is that the Apostle intends namely The actual sin of Adam the one sin of that one common person whilest he was so For although the corruption and depravation of our nature doth necessarily insue thereon in every one that is brought forth actually in the World by Natural Generation yet is it the guilt of Adams actual sin alone that rendred them all obnoxious unto death upon the First entrance of sin into the World So death entred by sin the guilt of it obnoxiousness unto it and that with respect unto all Men universally Death here compriseth the whole punishment due unto sin be it what it will concerning which we need not here to dispute The wages of sin is death Rom. 6.23 and nothing else Whatever sin deserves in the Justice of God whatever punishment God at any time appointed or threatned unto it it is comprised in death In the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death This therefore the Apostle lays down as the foundation of his discourse and of the comparison which he intends namely that in and by the actual sin of Adam all Men are made liable unto death or unto the whole punishment due unto sin That is the guilt of that sin is imputed unto them For nothing is intended by the imputation of sin unto any but the rendring them justly obnoxious unto the punishment due unto that sin As the not imputing of sin is the freeing of Men from being subject or liable unto punishment And this sufficiently evidenceth the vanity of the Pelagian Gloss that Death passed upon all meerly by vertue of natural propagation from him who had deserved it without any imputation of the guilt of sin unto them which is a contradiction unto the plain words of the Apostle For it is the guilt of sin and not natural propagation that he affirms to be the cause of Death Having mentioned sin and death the one as the only cause of the other the guilt of sin of the punishment of death sin deserving nothing but death and death being due unto nothing but sin he declares how all Men universally became liable unto this punishment or guilty of death 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in quo omnes peccaverunt in whom all have sinned For it relates unto the one Man that sinned in whom all sinned which is evident from the effect thereof in as much as in him all died 1 Cor. 15.22 Or as it is here on his sin Death passed on all Men. And this is the evident sense of the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being put for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is not unusual in the Scripture See Matth. 15.5 Rom. 4.18 Chap. 5.2 Phil. 1.3 Heb. 9.17 And it is so often used by the best Writers in the Greek Tongue So Hesiod 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 modus in omnibus rebus optimus So 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in vobis situm est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hoc in me situm est And this reading of the words is contended for by Austine against the Pelagians rejecting their eo quod or propterea But I shall not contend about the reading of the words It is the artifice of our adversaries to perswade Men that the force of our Argument to prove from hence the imputation of the sin of Adam unto his posterity doth depend solely upon this interpretation of these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by in whom We shall therefore grant them their desire that they are better rendred by eo quod propterea or quatenus
are dead or that death passed on them by that one offence The efficacy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the free gift opposed hereunto is expressed as that which abounded much more Besides the thing it self asserted which is plain and evident the Apostle seems to me to argue the equity of our Justification by Grace through the obedience of Christ by comparing it with the condemnation that befel us by the sin and disobedience of Adam For if it were just meet and equal that all Men should be made subject unto condemnation for the sin of Adam it is much more so that those who believe should be justified by the obedience of Christ through the grace and free donation of God But wherein in particular the gift by Grace abounded unto many above the efficacy of the fall to condemn he declares afterwards And that whereby we are freed from condemnation more eminently then we are made obnoxious unto it by the fall and sin of Adam by that alone we are justified before God But this is by the grace of God and the gift by Grace through Jesus Christ alone which we plead for Ver. 16. Another difference between the comparates is expressed or rather the instance is given in particular of the dissimilitude asserted in general before And not as it was by one that sinned so is the gift for the judgment was by one to condemnation but the free gift is of many offences unto Justification 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By one that sinned is the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by one sin one offence the one sin of that one Man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we render judgment Most Interpreters do it by reatus guilt or crimen which is derived from it So 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Judicium is used in the Hebrew for guilt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Jere. 26.11 The judgment of death is to this Man this Man is guilty of death hath deserved to die First therefore there was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the sin the fall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of one Man that sinned it was his actual sin alone Thence followed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 reatus guilt this was common unto all In and by that one sin guilt came upon all And the end hereof that which it rendered Men obnoxious unto is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 condemnation guilt unto condemnation and this guilt unto condemnation which came upon all was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of one person or sin This is the order of things on the part of Adam 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the one sin 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the guilt that thereon insued unto all 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the condemnation which that guilt deserved And their Antitheta or Opposites in the Second Adam are 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the free donation of God 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the gift of Grace it self or the Righteousness of Christ. 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justification of Life But yet though the Apostle doth thus distinguish these things to illustrate his comparison and opposition yet that which he intends by them all is the Righteousness and Obedience of Christ as he declares Ver. 18 19. This in the matter of our Justification he 1. calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with respect unto the free gratuitous grant of it by Grace of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with respect unto us who receive it A free gift it is unto us and 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with respect unto its effect of making us righteous Whereas therefore by the sin of Adam imputed unto them guilt came on all men unto condemnation we must inquire wherein the free gift was otherwise Not as by one that sinned so was the gift And it was so in two things For 1. Condemnation came upon all by one offence But being under the guilt of that one offence we contract the guilt of many more innumerable Wherefore if the free gift had respect only unto that one offence and intended it self no further we could not be delivered wherefore it is said to be of many offences that is of all our sins and trespasses whatever 2. Adam and all his posterity in him were in a state of acceptation with God and placed in a way of obtaining eternal life and blessedness wherein God himself would have been their reward In this estate by the entrance of sin they lost the favor of God and incurred the guilt of death or condemnation for they are the same But they lost not an immediate right and title unto life and blessedness For this they had not nor could have before the course of obedience prescribed unto them was accomplished That therefore which came upon all by the one offence was the loss of Gods favor in the approbation of their present state and the judgment or guilt of death and condemnation But an immediate right unto eternal life by that one sin was not lost The free gift is not so For as by it we are freed not only from one sin but from all our sins so also by it we have a right and title unto eternal life For therein Grace reigns through Righteousness unto eternal life Ver. 22. The same truth is further explained and confirmed Ver. 17. For if by one Mans offence death reigned by one much more they which receive abundance of Grace and of the gift of Righteousness shall reign in life by one Jesus Christ. The design of the Apostle having been sufficiently manifested in our observations on the former Verses I shall from this only observe those things which more immediately concern our present subject And 1. it is worth observation with what variety of expressions the Apostle sets forth the Grace of God in the Justification of Believers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Nothing is omitted that may any way express the freedom sufficiency and efficacy of Grace unto that end And although these terms seem some of them to be coincident in their signification and to be used by him promiscuously yet do they every one include something that is peculiar and all of them set forth the whole work of Grace 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 seems to me to be used in this Argument for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is the foundation of a cause in tryal the matter pleaded whereon the person tried is to be acquitted and justified And this is the Righteousness of Christ of one 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or a free donation is exclusive of all desert and conditions on our part who do receive it And it is that whereby we are freed from condemnation and have a right unto the Justification of life 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is the free grace and favor of God which is the original or efficient cause of our Justification as was declared Chap. 3.24 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hath been explained before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the abundance of
grace is added to secure Believers of the certainty of the effect It is that whereunto nothing is wanting unto our Justification 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 expresseth the free grant of that Righteousness which is imputed unto us unto the Justification of life afterwards called the obedience of Christ. Be Men as wise and learned as they please it becomes us all to learn to think and speak of those Divine Mysteries from this Blessed Apostle who knew them better then we all and besides wrote by divine inspiration And it is marvellous unto me how Men can break through the fence that he hath made about the grace of God and obedience of Christ in the work of our Justification before God to introduce their our own Works of Obedience and to find a place for them therein But the design of Paul and some Men in declaring this point of our Justification before God seems to be very opposite and contrary His whole discourse is concerning the Grace of God the Death Blood and Obedience of Christ as if he could never sufficiently satisfie himself in the setting out and declaration of them without the least mention of any works or duties of our own or the least intimation of any use that they are of herein But all their pleas are for their own works and duties and they have invented as many terms to set them out by as the Holy Ghost hath used for the expression and declaration of the Grace of God Instead of the words of Wisdom before mentioned which the Holy Ghost hath taught wherewith he fills up his discourse theirs are filled with conditions preparatory dispositions merits causes and I know not what trappings for our own works For my part I shall chuse rather to learn of him and accommodate my conceptions and expressions of Gospel Mysteries and of this in especial concerning our Justification unto his who cannot deceive me than trust to any other conduct how specious soever its pretences may be 2. It is plain in this Verse that no more is required of any one unto Justification but that he receive the abundance of Grace and the gift of Righteousness For this is the description that the Apostle gives of those that are justified as unto any thing that on their part is required And as this excludes all Works of Righteousness which we do for by none of them do we receive the abundance of Grace and the gift of Righteousness so it doth also the imputation of Faith it self unto our Justification as it is an act and duty of our own For Faith is that whereby we receive the gift of Righteousness by which we are justified For it will not be denied but that we are justified by the gift of Righteousness or the Righteousness which is given unto us for by it have we right and title unto life But our Faith is not this gift for that which receiveth and that which is received are not the same 3. Where there is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 abounding grace superabounding grace exerted in our Justification no more is required thereunto For how can it be said to abound yea to superabound not only to the freeing of us from condemnation but the giving of us a title unto life if in any thing it is to be supplied and eeked out by works and duties of our own The things intended do fill up these expressions although to some they are but an empty noise 4. There is a gift of Righteousness required unto our Justification which all must receive who are to be justified And all are justified who do receive it for they that receive it shall reign in life by Jesus Christ. And hence it follows 1. That the Righteousness whereby we are justified before God can be nothing of our own nothing inherent in us nothing performed by us For it is that which is freely given us and this donation is by imputation Blessed is the Man unto whom the Lord imputeth Righteousness Chap. 4.6 And by Faith we receive what is so given and imputed and otherwise we contribute nothing unto our participation of it This it is to be justified in the sense of the Apostle 2. It is such a Righteousness as gives right and title unto eternal life For they that receive it shall reign in life Wherefore it cannot consist in the pardon of sin alone For 1. the pardon of sin can in no tolerable sense be called the gift of Righteousness Pardon of sin is one thing and Righteousness another 2. Pardon of sin doth not give right and title unto eternal life It is true he whose sins are pardoned shall inherit eternal life but not meerly by vertue of that pardon but through the imputation of Righteousness which doth inseparably accompany it and is the ground of it The description which is here given of our Justification by Grace in opposition unto the condemnation that we were made liable unto by the sin of Adam and in exaltation above it as to the efficacy of Grace above that of the first sin in that thereby not one but all sins are forgiven and not only so but a right unto life eternal is communicated unto us is this That we receive the Grace of God and the gift of Righteousness which gives us a right unto life by Jesus Christ. But this is to be justified by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ received by Faith alone The conclusion of what hath been evinced in the management of the comparison insisted on is fully expressed and further confirmed Ver. 18 19. Ver. 18. Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all Men unto condemnation even so by the Righteousness of one the free gift came upon all Men unto the Justification of life So we read the words By the offence of one the Greek Copies vary here Some read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whom Beza followeth and our Translation in the Margin by one offence most by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the offence of one and so afterwards as unto Righteousness but both are unto the same purpose For the one offence intended is the offence of one that is of Adam And the one Righteousness is the Righteousness of one Jesus Christ. The Introduction of this Assertion by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the note of a Syllogistical inference declares what is here asserted to be the substance of the truth pleaded for And the comparison is continued 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 these things have themselves after the same manner That which is affirmed on the one side is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the sin or fall of one on all Men unto condemnation that is Judgment say we repeating 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the foregoing Verse But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is guilt and that only By the sin of one all Men became guilty and were made obnoxious unto condemnation The guilt of it is imputed unto all Men. For no otherwise can it
come upon them unto condemnation no otherwise can they be rendered obnoxious unto death and judgment on the account thereof For we have evinced that by death and condemnation in this disputation of the Apostle the whole punishment due unto sin is intended This therefore is plain and evident on that hand In answer hereunto the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of one as to the causality of Justification is opposed unto the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the other as unto its causality unto or of condemnation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By the Righteousness of one That is the Righteousness that is pleadable 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unto Justification For that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Righteousness pleaded for Justification By this say our Translators the free gift came upon all repeating 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the foregoing Verse as they had done 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before on the other hand The Syriack Translation renders the words without the aid of any supplement Therefore as by the sin of one condemnation was unto all men so by the Righteousness of one Justification unto life shall be unto all Men. And the sense of the words is so made plain without the supply of any other word into the Text. But whereas in the original the words are not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so in the later clause somewhat from his own foregoing words is to be supplied to answer the intention of the Apostle And this is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gratiosa donatio the free grant of Righteousness or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the free gift of Righteousness unto Justification The Righteousness of one Christ Jesus is freely granted unto all Believers to the Justification of life For the all Men here mentioned are described by and limited unto them that receive the abundance of Grace and the gift of Righteousness by Christ Ver. 17. Some vainly pretend from hence a general grant of righteousness and life unto all men whereof the greatest part are never made partakers then which nothing can be more opposite nor contradictory unto the Apostles design Men are not made guilty of condemnation from the Sin of Adam by such a Divine constitution as that they may or on some conditions may not be obnoxious thereunto Every one so soon as he actually exists and by vertue thereof is a descendant from the first Adam is actually in his own person liable thereunto and the wrath of God abideth on him And no more are intended on the other side but those only who by their relation through Faith unto the Lord Christ the second Adam are actually interessed in the Justification of life Neither is the controversie about the universality of Redemption by the Death of Christ herein concerned For those by whom it is asserted do not affirm that it is thence necessary that the free gift unto the Justification of life should come on all for that they know it doth not do And of a provision of Righteousness and life for men in case they do believe although it be true yet nothing is spoken in this place Only the certain Justificatin of them that believe and the way of it is declared Nor will the Analogy of the Comparison here insisted on admit of any such interpretation For the all on the one hand are all and only those who derive their being from Adam by natural propagation If any man might be supposed not to do so he would not be concerned in his Sin or Fall And so really it was with the man Christ Jesus And those on the other hand are only those who derive a spiritual life from Christ. Suppose a man not to do so and he is no way interessed in the Righteousness of the one unto the Justification of life Our Argument from the words is this As the Sin of one that came on all unto condemnation was the Sin of the first Adam imputed unto them so the Righteousness of the one unto the Justification of life that comes on all Believers is the Righteousness of Christ imputed unto them And what can be more clearly affirmed or more evidently confirmed than this is by the Apostle I know not Yet is it more plainly expressed v. 19. For as by one mans Disobedience many were made Sinners so by the Obedience of one shall many be made Righteous This is well explained by Cyrillus Alexandrinus in Joan. Lib. 11. Cap. 25. Quemadmodum praevaricatione primi hominis ut in primitiis generis nostri morti addicti fuimus eodem modo per obedientiam justitiam Christi in quantum seipsum legi subjecit quamvis legis author esset benedictio vivificatio quae per spiritum est ad totam nostram penetravit naturam And by Leo. Epist. 12. ad Juvenalem Vt autem reparet omnium vitam recepit omnium causam ut sicut per unius reatum omnes facti fuerunt peccatores ita per unius innocentiam omnes fierent innocentes inde in homines manaret justitia ubi est humana suscepta natura That which he before called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he now expresseth by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Disobedience and Obedience The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Adam or his Disobedience was his actual transgression of the Law of God Hereby saith the Apostle many were made Sinners Sinners in such a sense as to be obnoxious unto Death and Condemnation For liable unto Death they could not be made unless they were first made Sinners or guilty And this they could not be but that they are esteemed to have sinned in him whereon the guilt of his Sin was imputed unto them This therefore he affirms namely that the actual sin of Adam was so the sin of all men as that they were made sinners thereby obnoxious unto Death and Condemnation That which he opposeth hereunto is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Obedience of one that is of Jesus Christ. And this was the Actual Obedience that he yielded unto the whole Law of God For as the Disobedience of Adam was his actual Transgression of the whole Law so the Obedience of Christ was his actual accomplishment or fulfilling of the whole Law This the Antithesis doth require Hereby many are made Righteous How By the Imputation of that Obedience unto them For so and no otherwise are men made Sinners by the Imputation of the Disobedience of Adam And this is that which gives us a right and title unto eternal life as the Apostle declares vers 21. That as Sin reigned unto death so might Grace reign through Righteousness unto eternal life This Righteousness is no other but the Obedience of one that is of Christ as it is called vers 18. And it is said to come upon us that is to be imputed unto us For blessed is the man unto whom God imputeth Righteousness And hereby we have not only deliverance from
things we may observe in the Apostles assignation of the causes of our deliverance from a state of sin and acceptance with God 1. That he assigns the whole of this work absolutely unto Grace Love and Mercy and that with an exclusion of the consideration of any thing on our part as we shall see immediately Ver. 5 8. 2. He magnifies this Grace in a marvellous manner For 1. He expresseth it by all names and titles whereby it is signified as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mercy Love Grace and Kindness For he would have us to look only unto Grace herein 2. He ascribes such Adjuncts and gives such Epithets unto that Divine Mercy and Grace which is the sole cause of our deliverance in and by Jesus Christ as render it singular and herein solely to be adored 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rich in Mercy Great Love wherewith he loved us The exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness Ver. 4 5 6 7. It cannot reasonably be denied but that the Apostle doth design deeply to affect the Mind and Heart of Believers with a sense of the Grace and Love of God in Christ as the only cause of their Justification before God I think no words can express those conceptions of the Mind which this Representation of Grace doth suggest Whether they think it any part of their duty to be like minded and comply with the Apostle in this design who scarce ever mention the Grace of God unless it be in a way of diminution from its efficacy and unto whom such Ascriptions unto it as are here made by him are a matter of contempt is not hard to judge But it will be said these are good words indeed but they are only general there is nothing of Argument in all this adoring of the Grace of God in the work of our Salvation It may be so it seems to many But yet to speak plainly there is to me more Argument in this one consideration namely of the Ascription made in this cause unto the Grace of God in this place then in an hundred Sophisms suited neither unto the expressions of the Scripture nor the experience of them that do believe He that is possessed with a due apprehension of the Grace of God as here represented and under a sense that it was therein the design of the Holy Ghost to render it glorious and alone to be trusted unto will not easily be induced to concern himself in those additional supplies unto it from our own works and obedience which some would suggest unto him But we may yet look further into the words The case which the Apostle states the inquiry which he hath in hand whereon he determineth as to the Truth wherein he instructs the Ephesians and in them the whole Church of God is How a lost condemned sinner may come to be accepted with God and thereon saved And this is the sole inquiry wherein we are or intend in this controversie to be concerned Further we will not proceed either upon the invitation or provocation of any Concerning this his position and determination is That we are saved by Grace This first he occasionally interposeth in his enumeration of the benefits we receive by Christ Ver. 5. But not content therewith he again directly asserts it Ver. 8. in the same words for he seems to have considered how slow Men would be in the admittance of this Truth which at once deprives them of all boastings in themselves What it is that he intends by our being saved must be inquired into It would not be prejudicial unto but rather advance the truth we plead for if by our being saved eternal Salvation were intended But that cannot be the sense of it in this place otherwise than as that Salvation is included in the causes of it which are effectual in this life Nor do I think that in that expression By Grace ye are saved our Justification only is intended although it be so principally Conversion unto God and Sanctification are also included therein as is evident from Ver. 5 6. And they are no less of sovereign Grace than is our Justification it self But the Apostle speaks of what the Ephesians being now Believers and by vertue of their being so were made partakers of in this life This is manifest in the whole context For having in the beginning of the Chapter described their condition what it was in common with all the Posterity of Adam by nature Ver. 1 2 3. He moreover declares their condition in particular in opposition to that of the Jews as they were Gentiles Idolaters Atheists Ver. 11 12. Their present delivery by Jesus Christ from this whole miserable state and condition that which they were under in common with all mankind and that which was a peculiar aggravation of its misery in themselves is that which he intends by their being saved That which was principally designed in the description of this state is That therein and thereby they were liable unto the wrath of God guilty before him and obnoxious unto his judgment This he expresseth in the declaration of it Ver. 3. Answerable unto that method and those grounds he every where proceeds on in declaring the Doctrine of Justification Rom. 3.19 20 21 22 23 24. Tit. 3.3 4 5. From this state they had deliverance by Faith in Christ Jesus For unto as many as received him power is given to be the sons of God Joh. 1.12 He that believeth on him is not condemned that is he is saved in the sense of the Apostle in this place Joh. 3.15 He that believeth on the Son of God hath everlasting life is saved but he that believeth not the wrath of God abideth on him Ver. 36. And in this sense saved and Salvation are frequently used in the Scripture Besides he gives us so full a description of the Salvation which he intends from Ver. 13. unto the end of the Chapter that there can be no doubt of it It is our being made nigh by the Blood of Christ Ver. 13. Our Peace with God by his death Ver. 14 15. Our Reconciliation by the Blood of the Cross Ver. 16. Our access unto God and all Spiritual priviledges thereon depending Ver. 18 19 20 c. Wherefore the inquiry of the Apostle and his determination thereon is concerning the causes of our Justification before God This he declares and fixeth both Positively and Negatively Positively 1. In the supream moving Cause on the part of God This is that free sovereign Grace and Love of his which he illustrates by its adjuncts and properties before mentioned 2. In the meritorious procuring cause of it which is Jesus Christ in the Work of his Mediation as the Ordinance of God for the rendring this Grace effectual unto his Glory Ver. 7 13 16. 3. In the only means or instrumental cause on our part which is Faith By Grace are ye saved through Faith Ver. 8. And lest he should seem to derogate any thing from the Grace
consists in them alone For without Faith it is impossible to please God And to what purpose should the Apostle exclude evil works and hypocritical from our Justification Who ever imagined that any could be justified with respect unto them There might have been some pretence for this gloss had the Apostle said his own Works but whereas he rejects his own Righteousness to restrain it unto such Works as are not righteous as will denominate none righteous as are no Righteousness at all is most absurd 3. Works wrought in Faith if applied unto our Justification do give occasion unto or include boasting more then any others as being better and more praise worthy then they 4. The Apostle elswhere excludes from Justification the Works that Abraham had done when he had been a Believer many years and the Works of David when he described the Blessedness of a Man by the forgiveness of sins 5. The state of the Question which he handles in his Epistle unto the Galatians was expresly about the Works of them that did believe For he doth not disspute against the Jews who would not be pressed in the least with his Arguments namely that if the inheritance were by the Law then the promise was of none effect and if Righteousness were by the Law then did Christ die in vain For these things they would readily grant But he speaks unto them that were Believers with respect unto those Works which they would have joyned with Christ and the Gospel in order unto Justification 6. If this were the mind of the Apostle that he would exclude one sort of Works and assert the necessity of another unto the same end why did he not once say so especially considering how necessary it was that so he should do to answer those objections against his doctrine which he himself takes notice of and returns answer unto on other grounds without the least intimation of any such distinction Bellarmine considereth this Testimony in three places Lib. 1. cap. 18. Lib. 1. cap. 19. Lib. 5. cap. 5. De Justificat And he returns three answers unto it which contain the substance of all that is pleaded by others unto the same purpose 1. He saith That the Righteousness which is by the Law and which is opposed unto the Righteousness which is by Faith is not the Righteousness written in the Law or which the Law requires but a Righteousness wrought without the aid of Grace by the knowledge of the Law alone 2. That the Righteousness which is by the Faith of Christ are opera nostra justa facta ex fide our own righteous Works wrought in Faith which others call our Evangelical Works 3. That it is blasphemous to call the Duties of Inherent Righteousnes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 loss and dung But he labors in the fire with all his sophistry For as to the first 1. That by the Righteousness which is by the Law the Righteousness which the Law requires is not intended is a bold assertion and expresly contradictory unto the Apostle Rom. 9.31 Chap. 10.5 In both places he declares the Righteousness of the Law to be the Righteousnes that the Law requires 2. The Works which he excludes he calls the Works of Righteousness that we have done Tit. 3.5 which are the Works that the Law requires Unto the second I say 1. That the substance of it is That the Apostle should profess that I desire to be found in Christ not having my own Righteousness but having my own Righteousness for Evangelical Inherent Righteousness was properly his own And I am sorry that some should apprehend that the Apostle in these words did desire to be found in his own Righteousness in the presence of God in order unto his Justification For nothing can be more contrary not only unto the perpetual tenor and design of all his discourses on this subject but also unto the Testimony of all other holy Men in the Scripture to the same purpose as we have proved before And I suppose there are very few true Believers at present whom they will find to comply and joyn with them in this desire of being found in their own Personal Evangelical Righteousness or the Works of Righteousness which they have done in their tryal before God as unto their Justification We should do well to read our own hearts as well as the Books of others in this matter 2. The Righteousness which is of God by Faith is not our own Obedience or Righteousness but that which is opposed unto it That which God imputes unto us Rom. 4.6 That which we receive by way of gift Rom. 5.17 3. That by the Righteousness which is by the Faith of Christ Jesus our own Inherent Righteousness is not intended is evident from hence That the Apostle excludes all his own Righteousness as and when he was found in Christ that is what ever he had done as a Believer And if there be not an opposition in these words between a Righteousness that is our own and that which is not our own I know not in what words it can be expressed Unto the third I say 1. The Apostle doth not nor do we say that he doth call our Inherent Righteousness dung but only that he accounts it so 2. He doth not account it so absolutely which he is most remote from but only in comparison with Christ. 3. He doth not esteem it so in it self but only as unto his trust in it with respect unto one especial end namely our Justification before God 4. The Prophet Isaiah in the same respect terms all our Righteousness filthy rags Chap. 64.6 And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is an expression of as much contempt as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 5. Some say all Works are excluded as meritorious of Grace Life and Salvation but not as the condition of our Justification before God But 1. what ever the Apostle excludes he doth it absolutely and with all respects because he sets up something else in opposition unto it 2. There is no ground left for any such distinction in this place For all that the Apostle requires unto our Justification is 1. That we be found in Christ not in our selves 2. That we have the Righteousness of God not our own 3. That we be made partakers of this Righteousness by Faith which is the substance of what we plead for CHAP. XIX Objections against the Doctrine of Justification by the imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Personal Holiness and Obedience not obstructed but furthered by it THat which remaineth to put an issue to this Discourse is the consideration of some things that in general are laid in objection against the truth pleaded for Many things of that nature we have occasionally met withal and already removed Yea the principal of those which at present are most insisted on The Testimonies of Scripture urged by those of the Roman Church for Justification by works have all of them so fully and frequently been answered by
believe in answer unto the commands of the Gospel and not to be thereon in the same instant of time absolutely justified is not to dispute about any point of Religion but plainly to deny the whole truth of the Gospel But it is Faith alone that gives power and efficacy unto Gospel Commands effectually to influence the Soul unto Obedience Wherefore this Obligation is more powerfully constraining as they are given unto those that are justified then if they were given them in order unto their Justification Secondly The Apostle answers as we do also Do we then make void the Law through Faith God forbid yea we establish the Law For although the Law is principally established in and by the Obedience and Sufferings of Christ Rom. 8.3 4. Chap. 10.3 4. Yet is it not by the Doctrine of Faith and the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto the Justification of life made void as unto Believers Neither of these do exempt them from that Obligation unto universal Obedience which is prescribed in the Law They are still obliged by vertue thereof to love the Lord their God with all their Hearts and their Neighbours as themselves They are indeed freed from the Law and all its commands unto Duty as it abides in its first consideration Do this and live the opposite whereunto is Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things written in the Law to do them For he that is under the Obligation of the Law in order unto Justification and Life falls inevitably under the Curse of it upon the supposition of any one Transgression But we are made free to give Obedience unto it on Gospel motives and for Gospel ends as the Apostle declares at large Rom. 6. And the Obligation of it is such unto all Believers as that the least Transgression of it hath the nature of sin But are they hereon bound over by the Law unto everlasting punishment or as some phrase it will God damn them that Transgress the Law without which all this is nothing I ask again what they think hereof And upon a supposition that he will do so what they further think will become of themselves For my part I say no even as the Apostle saith There is no condemnation unto them that are in Christ Jesus Where then they will say is the necessity of Obedience from the Obligation of the Law if God will not damn them that Transgress it And I say it were well if some men did understand what they say in these things or would learn for a while at least to hold their peace The Law equally requires Obedience in all instances of Duty if it require any at all As unto its Obligatory power it is capable neither of Dispensation nor Relaxation so long as the essential differences of good and evil do remain If then none can be obliged unto Duty by vertue of its commands but that they must on every Transgression fall under its curse either it obligeth no one at all or no one can be saved But although we are freed from the Curse and condemning power of the Law by him who hath made an end of sin and brought in everlasting Righteousness yet whilest we are viatores in order unto the accomplishment of Gods design for the Restauration of his Image in us we are obliged to endeavour after all that Holiness and Righteousness which the Law requires of us Thirdly The Apostle answereth this Objection by discovering the necessary Relation that Faith hath unto the Death of Christ the grace of God with the nature of Sanctification excellency use and advantage of Gospel Holiness and the end of it in Gods appointment This he doth at large in the whole Sixth Chapter of the Epistle to the Romans and that with this immediate design to shew the consistency of Justification by Faith alone with the necessity of personal Righteousness and Holiness The due pleading of these things would require a just and full Exposition of that Chapter wherein the Apostle hath comprized the chief springs and reasons of Evangelical Obedience I shall only say that those unto whom the reasons of it and motives unto it therein expressed which are all of them compliant with the Doctrine of Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ are not effectual unto their own personal Obedience and do not demonstrate an indispensible necessity of it are so unacquainted with the Gospel the nature of Faith the genius and inclination of the new Creature for let men scoff on whilest they please he that is in Christ Jesus is a new Creature the constraining efficacy of the grace of God and love of Christ of the Oeconomy of God in the disposition of the causes and means of our Salvation as I shall never trouble my self to contend with them about these things Sundry other considerations I thought to have added unto the same purpose And to have shewed 1 That to prove the necessity of inherent Righteousness and Holiness we make use of the Arguments which are suggested unto us in the Scripture 2 That we make use of all of them in the sense wherein and unto the ends for which they are urged therein in perfect compliance with what we teach concerning Justification 3 That all the pretended Arguments or motives for and unto Evangelical Holiness which are inconsistent with the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ do indeed obstruct it and evert it 4 That the Holiness which we make necessary unto the Salvation of them that believe is of a more excellent sublime and Heavenly nature in its causes essence operations and effects than what is allowed or believed by the most of those by whom the Doctrine of Justification is opposed 5 That the Holiness and Righteousness which is pleaded for by the Socinians and those that follow them doth in nothing exceed the Righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees nor upon their principles can any man go beyond them But whereas this Discourse hath already much exceeded my first intention and that as I said before I have already at large treated on the Doctrine of the nature and necessity of Evangelical Holiness I shall at present omit the further handling of these things and acquiesce in the answers given by the Apostle unto this Objection CHAP. XX. The Doctrine of the Apostle James concerning Faith and Works It s agreement with that of St. Paul THe seeming difference that is between the Apostle Paul and James in what they teach concerning Faith Works and Justification requires our consideration of it For many do take advantage from some words and expressions used by the later directly to oppose the Doctrine fully and plainly declared by the former But whatever is of that nature pretended hath been so satisfactorily already answered and removed by others as that there is no great need to treat of it again And although I suppose that there will not be an end of contending and writing in these causes
unto the Preface unto his Exposition of his Epistles of which kind they will be directed unto more in due season But he needs not the Testimony of men nor of the whole Church together whose safety and security it is to be built on that Doctrine which he taught In the mean time it would not be unpleasant to consider but that the perverseness of the minds of men is rather a real occasion of sorrow how those who have the same design do agree in their conceptions about his Writings for some will have it that if not all yet the most of his Epistles were Written against the Gnosticks and in the confutation of their errour others that the Gnosticks took the occasion of their errours from his Writings So bold will men make with things Divine to satisfie a present interest Secondly This was not the judgment of the ancient Church for three or four hundred years For whereas the Epistles of Paul were always esteemed the principal treasure of the Church the great guide and rule of the Christian Faith this of James was scarce received as Canonical by many and doubted of by the most as both Eusebius and Hierome do testifie Thirdly The design of the Apostle James is not at all to explain the meaning of Paul in his Epistles as is pretended but only to vindicate the Doctrine of the Gospel from the abuse of such as used their liberty for a cloak of Maliciousness and turning the Grace of God into lasciviousness continued in sin under a pretence that Grace had abounded unto that end Fourthly The Apostle Paul doth himself as we have declared vindicate his own Doctrine from such exceptions and abuses as men either made at it or turned it unto Nor have we any other Doctrine in his Epistles than what he Preached all the World over and whereby he laid the foundation of Christian Religion especially among the Gentiles These things being premised I shall briefly evidence that there is not the least Repugnancy or contradiction between what is declared by these two Apostles as unto our Justification with the causes of it And this I shall do 1. By some general considerations of the nature and tendency of both their discourses 2 By a particular explication of the context in that of St. James And under the first head I shall manifest 1 That they have not the same scope design or end in their discourses That they do not consider the same question nor state the same case nor determine on the same enquiry and therefore not speaking ad idem unto the same thing do not contradict one another 2 That as Faith is a word of various signification in the Scripture and doth as we have proved before denote that which is of divers kinds they speak not of the same Faith or Faith of the same kind and therefore there can be no contradiction in what the one ascribes unto it and the other derogates from it seeing they speak not of the same Faith 3 That they do not speak of Justification in the same sense nor with respect unto the same ends 4 That as unto Works they both intend the same namely the Works of Obedience unto the moral Law As to the scope and design of the Apostle Paul the question which he answereth the case which he proposeth and determines upon are manifest in all his Writings especially his Epistles unto the Romans and Galatians The whole of his purpose is to declare how a guilty convinced sinner comes through Faith in the blood of Christ to have all his sins pardoned to be accepted with God and obtain a right unto the Heavenly inheritance that is be acquitted and justified in the sight of God And as the Doctrine hereof belonged eminently unto the Gospel whose Revelation and Declaration unto the Gentiles was in a peculiar manner committed unto him so as we have newly observed he had an especial reason to insist much upon it from the opposition that was made unto it by the Jews and Judaizing Christians who ascribed this priviledge unto the Law and our own Works of Obedience in compliance therewithal This is the case he states this the question he determines in all his Discourses about Justification and in the explication thereof declares the nature and causes of it as also vindicates it from all exceptions For whereas men of corrupt minds and willing to indulge unto their lusts as all men naturally desire nothing but what God hath made eternally inconsistent namely that they may live in sin here and come to blessedness hereafter might conclude that if it were so as he declared that we are justified freely through the Grace of God by the Imputation of a Righteousness that Originally and inherently is not our own then was there no more required of us no relinquishment of sin no attendance unto the duties of Righteousness and Holiness he obviates such impious suggestions and shews the inconsequence of them on the Doctrine that he taught But this he doth not do in any place by intimating or granting that our own Works of Obedience or Righteousness are necessary unto or have any causal influence into our Justification before God Had there been a Truth herein were not a supposition thereof really inconsistent with the whole of his Doctrine and destructive of it he would not have omitted the Plea of it nor ought so to have done as we have shewed And to suppose that there was need that any other should explain and vindicate his Doctrine from the same exceptions which he takes notice of by such a Plea as he himself would not make use of but rejects is foolish and impious The Apostle James on the other hand had no such scope or design or any such occasion for what he wrote in this matter He doth not enquire or give intimation of any such enquiry he doth not state the Case how a guilty convinced Sinner whose mouth is stopped as unto any plea or excuse for himself may come to be justified in the sight of God that is receive the Pardon of sins and the gift of Righteousness unto life To resolve this question into our own Works is to overthrow the whole Gospel But he had in hand a business quite of another nature For as we have said there were many in those days who professed the Christian Religion or Faith in the Gospel whereon they presumed that as they were already justified so that there was nothing more needful unto them that they might be saved A desirable estate they thought they had attained suited unto all the interest of the Flesh whereby they might live in Sin and neglect of all Duty of Obedience and yet be eternally saved Some suppose that this pernicious conceit was imbibed by them from the poysonous Opinions that some had then divulged according as the Apostle Paul foretold that it would come to pass 2 Tim. 4.1 2 3. For it is generally conceived that Simon Magus and his followers
He is utterly mistaken for the Apostle doth not ascribe Justification partly to Works and partly to Faith but he ascribes Justification in the sense by him intended wholly to Works in opposition to that Faith concerning which he treats For there is a plain Antithesis in the Words between Works and Faith as unto Justification in the sense by him intended A dead Faith a Faith without Works the Faith of Devils is excluded from having any influence into Justification Fourthly He adds that the Apostle compares this Faith without Works unto a rich man that gives nothing unto the poor ver 16. and a Body without a Spirit ver 26. wherefore as that knowledg whereby a rich man knows the wants of the poor is true and real and a dead body is a body so is Faith without Works true Faith also and as such is considered by Saint James Ans. These things do evidently destroy what they are produced in the confirmation of only the Cardinal helps them out with a little Sophistry For whereas the Apostle compares this Faith unto the charity of a man that gives nothing to the poor he suggests in the room thereof his knowledge of their poverty And his knowledge may be true and the more true and certain it is the more false and feigned is the charity which he pretends in these words Go and be fed or cloathed Such is the Faith the Apostle speaks of And although a dead body is a true body that is as unto the matter or substance of it a Carcass yet is it not an essential part of a living man A Carcass is not of the same nature or kind as is the body of a living man And we assert no other difference between the Faith spoken of by the Apostle and that which is justifying than what is between a dead breathless Carcass and a living animated body prepared and fitted for all vital acts Wherefore it is evident beyond all contradiction if we have not a mind to be contentious that what the Apostle James here derogates from Faith as unto our Justification it respects only a dead barren lifeless Faith such as is usually pretended by ungodly godly men to countenance themselves in their sins And herein the Faith asserted by Paul hath no concern The consideration of the present condition of the profession of Faith in the World will direct us unto the best exposition of this place Thirdly They speak not of Justification in the same sense nor unto the same end It is of our absolute Justification before God the Justification of our persons our acceptance with him and the grant of a right unto the Heavenly inheritance that the Apostle Paul doth treat and thereof alone This he declares in all the causes of it all that on the part of God or on our part concurreth thereunto The evidence the knowledge the sense the fruit the manifestation of it in our own Consciences in the Church unto others that profess the Faith he treats not of but speaks of them separately as they occur on other occasions The Justification he treats of is but one and at once accomplished before God changing the relative state of the person justified and is capable of being evidenced various ways unto the glory of God and the consolation of them that truly believe Hereof the Apostle James doth not treat at all for his whole enquiry is after the nature of that Faith whereby we are justified and the only way whereby it may be evidenced to be of the right kind such as a man may safely trust unto Wherefore he treats of Justification only as to the evidence and manifestation of it nor had he any occasion to do otherwise And this is apparent from both the instances whereby he confirms his purpose The first is that of Abraham ver 21.22 23. For he says that by Abrahams being justified by Works in the way and manner wherein he asserts him so to have been the Scripture was fulfilled which says that Abraham believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness And if his intention were to prove that we are justified before God by Works and not by Faith because Abraham was so the Testimony produced is contrary yea directly contradictory unto what should be proved by it and accordingly is alledged by Paul to prove that Abraham was justified by Faith without Works as the words do plainly import Nor can any man declare how the Truth of this proposition Abraham was justified by Works intending absolute Justification before God was that wherein that Scripture was fulfilled Abraham believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness especially considering the opposition that is made both here and elsewhere between Faith and Works in this matter Besides he asserts that Abraham was justified by Works then when he had offered his Son on the Altar the same we believe also but only enquire in what sense he was so justified For it was Thirty years or thereabout after it was testified concerning him that he believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness and when Righteousness was imputed unto him he was justified And twice justified in the same sense in the same way with the same kind of Justification he was not How then was he Justified by Works when he offered his Son on the Altar He that can conceive it to be any otherwise but that he was by his Work in the offering of his Son evidenced and declared in the sight of God and man to be justified apprehends what I cannot attain unto seeing that he was really justified long before as is unquestionable and confessed by all He was I say then justified in the sight of God in the way declared Gen. 22.12 And gave a signal Testimony unto the sincerity of his Faith and trust in God manifesting the truth of that Scripture he believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness And in the quotation of this Testimony the Apostle openly acknowledgeth that he was really accounted Righteous had Righteousness imputed unto him and was justified before God the reasons and causes whereof he therefore considereth not long before that Justification which he ascribes unto his Works which therefore can be nothing but the evidencing proving and manifestation of it whence also it appears of what nature that Faith is whereby we are justified the Declaration whereof is the principal design of the Apostle In brief the Scripture alledged that Abraham believed and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness was fulfilled when he was justified by Works on the offering of his Son on the Altar either by the Imputation of Righteousness unto him or by a real efficiency or working Righteousness in him or by the manifestation and evidence of his former Justification or some other way must be found out 1 That it was not by Imputation or that Righteousness unto the Justification of life was not then first imputed unto him is plain in the Text