have had from God at times of further Discoveries This is the substance of the answer of the Apostle and this reason Because of transgressions you see was a weighty reason why the Law should be given to the Jews if God had any love for them to make them his people above all other Nations viz. to keep them from running out into these gross sins which otherwise they would and other Nations not having the Law did run out into C. 19. Ver. 19 20. He sheweth his Word unto Jacob his Statutes and his Judgements unto Israel he hath not dealt so with any Nation And as for his Judgments they have not known them for though the Work of the Law be written in every mans heart as the Apostle tells us Rom. 2.14.15 where he is speaking of the Gentiles yet men will not be at the pains to read or study what is written there neither would Israel have done it had not the Law been written for them in Tables of stone too they would not have known God's Judgements any more then other Nations had not God given his Law to them by Moses And this we see by the event for that notwithstanding this Law yet when they came amongst other Nations they ran into their abominations though they had express Laws against them what would they have done therefore if they had been wholly without this Law There was therefore a necessity at least a great requisitness of a Law to be given to Israel if God loved them and would manifest his love to them more then to any other people he could not do it in an higher instance then in giving them the Law Therefore you see the Law might be given for other reasons then this to be a way of Justification by the works of it I will shew further anon why the lavv vvas given with respect to transgression I shall onely in the mean time observe one or tvvo things further in the Apostles answer to the objection which I mentioned by the Name of cautionary circumstances in his Answer one is this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it was added non data sed addita est it is not said simply the Law was given but added because of transgressions Added to what Why to the Promises to the Gospel that vvas on foot before long before above 2000. years before in Adam's time 430. years before in Abraham's time it vvas added to the Covenant that vvas before confirmed of God in Christ and it vvas added not as a supplement for the Gospel vvas compleat in it self it saved thousands before ever the Lavv vvas given by Moses and it vvould have saved thousands more and might have served till the coming of Christ for all any absolute necessity that there vvas of it Onely if the Lord vvould be so gracious to his people of Israel above all Nations in the World to give them his Will in Writing at large that they might be the better contained in their obedience better then other Nations vvere This vvas the Lords Bounty and Grace to them but it is certain ' t vvas never given them to be so much as a necessary supplement to the Gospel that vvas before in the matter of Justification It vvas added onely occasionally as an useful Appendix not as a necessary supplement not vvith design to supplant but to serve the Gospel I have mentioned one of the limitations or cautionary circumstances vvhich the Apostle useth in his assigning the reason of the Lavv's being given As the law was given onely occasionally and additionally so it was but a temporary dispensation it vvas added there is another 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 until such time as the Seed should come As the Law was but occasionally and additionally given at first so it is but temporary in its continuance as there is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in its beginning so there is an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a set-time of its continuance Here observe that though the Apostle doth allow that there was a weighty reason a great occasion of the Law 's being given yet he is afraid at the same time lest the Law should get too much advantage by this allowance of his and therefore gives these several terms of diminution whilest he speaks most for the honor of the Law Let us return now a little more to discover the mystery that is contain'd in that phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Law was added because of Transgressions for you shall find that there is much of mystery in it yet besides what I have mentioned What I have mentioned lyes more obvious that which remains is much more wonderful and mysterious yet expresly asserted by the Apostle in several places The Law therefore was added because of transgression in these three respects The Law was added because of transgression in three respects 1. To hinder transgression from being committed 2. To aggravate transgressions that were or should be committed And 3. ultimately to finish transgressions and make an end of sin by driving and directing the wounded sinner to a Saviour And all those three reasons are as I may say fundamental in the occasion of the Law its being added to the promises till the time that the Seed should come 1. The Law was added because of transgressions that is to hinder transgressions from being committed and the Law was added to hinder transgressions these two ways 1. As a large plain Rule to shew them what was their duty that so they might not run into transgressions through ignorance And 2dly as a fiery Law to deter them from sin and frighten them into their duty that so they might not run into transgressions through negligence 1. As a large plain Rule to shew them their duty This particular and this onely I insisted upon ere-while when I explained what was the substance of the Apostles Answer to the Objection and I shall add no more unto it 2dly It did not onely hinder transgression by informing them in their duty lest they should run into transgression through ignorance but as a fiery Law to deter them from transgression and to frighten them into their duty that they might not transgress through negligence though this doth not so much refer to the matter of the Law as to the manner of its delivery But yet this manner of its delivery is as much taken notice of by the Apostle and was as necessary almost as the matter of the Law it self Now this manner of its delivery with dread and terror consists of two things 1. Wherein consists the terror of the Law That it was delivered with thunderings and lightnings c. 2. That it was delivered much in the form of a Covenant of Works without that mixture of promises which the Gospel abounds with and these two things make up the terror of the Law of Moses and indeed this terror made up of these two parts is almost all that which is peculiar to their dispensation For else for
the matter of it setting aside the Ceremonial and Judicial Law it remains still obliging us in the dayes of the Gospel and the Apostle professeth to establish the Law even by the preaching of Faith 'T is true it was first of all given to the Jews that was their priviledge but now that it is given it is ours as well as theirs that therefore which seems to be peculiar to them in it was the manner of its delivery both being without promises and in that terrible manner given upon the Mount but yet still it was thus given because of transgressions to hinder transgressions they needed this terror at that time Children though they know their duty must have some terror to make them do it The Heir whilest he is a Child differeth nothing from a servant though he be Lord of all he is used like a servant harshly severely he is under Tutors and Governors till the time appointed by the Father Gal. 4.2 there is the same 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that the Apostle hath in his answer to the objection 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But because this particular hath some affinity with the second general end mentioned why the Law was given with respect to transgressions I shall now enter upon that and it was this 2. The Law was added because of transgressions for the heightning and aggravating of transgressions Rom. 5.20 The Law entered that the offence might abound 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 subingressa est irrepsit the Holy Ghost is pleased frequently to use such words as should shew that the Law came in by the by for some considerable ends indeed that the Lord had in delivering it but not as the great establisht way for Justification for certainly that could not come in by the by but the Law came in thus it stole in subingressa est it crept in by stealth irrepsit so the Original signifies But what was the end of the Law when it thus entred why it entred because of transgressions that the offences of men might abound In the 12. ver of Râ—â— 5. 〈◊〉 read that sin entered into the World and 〈◊〉 that the Law entered the Law hunted it followed it stole in afterwards to discover sin for as ver 13. hath it Before or until the Law sin was in the world that is not before the Law did oblige but before the Law was delivered in such a solemn manner as it was upon Mount Sinai before the Law sin was in the world but sin was not imputed when there was no Law yet death reigned all this while till Moses his time which was the curse of the Law Now that men might know wherefore they suffered death and the curse it was sit the Law should come into the world in a solemn manner delivered that so sin might be imputed by men to themselves as it was by God to men witness death the curse of the Law which reigned from Adam to Moses from Adam that sinned to Moses that gave the Law sin did not appear to be sin till the Law entred therefore it is said Sin that it might appear sin working death in me by that which is good viz. the Law that sin by the Commandment might become out of measure sinfull So Rom. 3.20 the Apostle proves that the Law cannot justifie for by the Law is the knowledge of sin The Law is so far from justifying saith the Apostle that it only brings sin to light brings the knowledg of sin with it makes the offence to abound and if that be the way to justifie sinners to aggravate their sins bind on their guilts more then ever upon their consciences let any man judg therefore indeed the Law in the immediate great intent of it was a killing Letter an Administration of Death a Ministration of Condemnation a Ministration of Desperation and not of righteousness unto justification and accordingly it was delivered with thundering lightning upon Mount Sinai to shew the horrible fire darkness tempest that there was in the Law it self to all that should come near it to think to make use of it for a way of Justification as Moses put a Vail upon his face to shew the vailedness of his Dispensation so the Law was delivered with fire to shew the fieriness of the Law unto the conscience for the Law was not only terrible to the beholders of it when it was given upon Mount Sinai but this terribleness is in the Law it self to all that ever had to do with it feelingly ever since to all that ever came near it for justification Indeed for those that stand aloof off from it only play about it at a distance hope to be saved in a loose way by their works by their good doings and by their good meanings they may perhaps never feel the stinging fiery lashes of the Law but let any of these self-Justiciaries drive their Principle to an Head let them come up near to the Law let them advance toward Mount Sinai and approach it and challenge their Justification from God by the Law and they shall quickly find themselvs scorched and scalded sent away with sad hearts and affrightned consciences they'â— find the Law to be a ministration of Death and not of Righteousness I might here shew in several particulars how the Lâ—w doth discover sin it discovers habitual sin St Paul or the man personated in Rom. 7. had never found there had been such a bottomless depth such a lively body of death within him but for the Law when that came sin revived and he dyed Rom. 7.9 2. It discovers actual sin I had not known sin that is lustings to be sin except the Law had said Thou shalt not covet ver 7. But I shall not insist longer upon this particular The third end of the Law 's being â—â—ded I hasten to the third great end of the Law 's being added with respect to transgressions and that was for the finishing of transgressions and making an end of sin as the expressions are though somewhat otherwise used Dan. 9.24 What shall we think that when God had given promises to Abraham and confirmed a Covenant in Christ to him and his Seed that he now gave a law to drive all his people into despair this amounts all to one as if he had broken his promise and his covenant as I have before argued out of the Apostle Paul did the Lord only send his law that they might know their duty and be affrightned into their duty as the first particular carries it if they did not do their duty should the law aggravate their sin bind on their guilts upon their Conscience and so leave them under desparation and be a ministration of death to them Was this all the Law came for If this were all they might better have been without the law at a venture then have had it they might have done better with the promises alone This therefore was not all the end
Now this being the great means of transferring Justification from the Law to Faith I shall a little insist upon the Explication of it That which I have to say upon it will be contained in these two assertions 1. That Christ in his own person here upon earth undertook the Law and answered it in all that it had to say against us And whereas it was a killing letter he took out this condemning power of it for all believers 2. That this was done by Christ for all ages of the Church and so it was and is the great foundation of that Justification by faith which the Apostle Paul contends to have been in all ages before the Law under the Law and in the dayes of the Gospel to the end of the world so that the way of Justification by faith comes in kindly and in a comely manner without any neglect or violation of the Law I begin with the first assertion That Christ in his own person here upon earth undertook and answered the Law The first assertion That Christ undertook answered the law for us c. Now to prove and illustrate this assertion it will be usefull to us 1. To consider in what condition the Lord Christ found us when he came into the world as a Saviour We were therefore all of us Jewes and Gentiles We were all under the law when Christ came to save us prisoners to the Law I shall give the account of this in the Apostle's expressions which are somewhat mystical to which I hope I shall adde some light by laying them together and comparing them one with another Before Christ came and before faith came and so at the time when Christ came when faith came in the doctrinal discovery or at any time doth come to us in the hearty closing with it We were kept under the Law Gal. 3.23 the words are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Law had set a guard upon us and as it follows we were shut up unto the faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we were all shut up as so many prisoners unto the Law and under its guard and custody and in Rom. 7.6 speaking of the Law the Apostle saith We were held by it that being dead that is the Law wherein we were HELD or by which we were detained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For though these places in the Galatians and Romanes may referr to the different dispensations of the Old Testament and New that before the dayes of the Gospel when faith came to be preached men were under a legal dispensation they were kept under the Law and shut up to the faith that was to be revealed yet I dare affirm that there is a deeper meaning then that at least a deeper truth then that if not in those places which is this That till Christ and the way of Justification by faith be made known to the soul the soul must needs be under a legal frame â—f heart towards God under fear and bondage â—ay and a further sense then this yet and that â—s this That till the virtue of the blood of Christ â—e applyed to the soul till actual Justification â—y or upon faith every man lies under the curse â—nd threatning and wrath of the Law the Law â—ath taken hold of us all an evident signe of â—hich is this That death hath passed upon all and â—hat is the reason why for that all have sinned â—om 5.12 And if any could plead exemption from this abnoxiousness to the Law it must be either the â—â—ntiles that had not the Law as the expression is â—â—m 2.14 that is had not the Law given to â—â—em or those that lived before the Law was â—ven by Moses now neither of these can plead â—is exemption therefore all mankinde were â—ptives to the Law when Christ undertook the â—ork of Redemption or rather until the desigâ—ation of Christ by the Father to this work For the first viz. the Gentiles the Apostle tells us that he had proved them under sin which is the transgression of the Law therefore under the Law and their thoughts within them did accuse for their breach of the Law which was written in their hearts Rom. 2.14 Neither were they free from this arrest of the Law who lived before the delivery of the Law by Moses for the Apostle tells us plainly Rom. 5.13 That untill the Law sin was in the world that is from Adam till the time that the Law was solemnly given by Moses sin was in the world now sin is the transgression of the Law and accordingly as sin was in the world all that space of time from Adam to Moses so Death reigned from Adam to Moses Now we know that death 〈◊〉 the wages of sin and the strength of sin is the Law 1 Cor. 15.56 Sin could never have brought in death but by the Law which bindes sin upon the sinner and with sin the punishment due to it therefore all that space of time from Adaâ— to Moses sin and death being in the world 〈◊〉 they were to be sure there was the Law in its power energy it was there in effect as sure 〈◊〉 it was in the hearts consciences of Heathens and the Grave was the Law 's Prison Death it's Arrest Sin it 's great Charge and Accusation by and upon which Death entred Sin entred in the world and death by sin upon the threatningâ— the Law Rom. 5.12 This was the state and condition therefore that Christ found us in wâ— were all under the Law as Prisoners and Captives therefore when the Father sent fort Christ upon the work of Redemption it is saâ— Gal. 4.4 God sent forth his Son made of a woman mâ—â— under the Law to redeem them that were under 〈◊〉 Law This was written to the Galatians who were Gentiles That we putting himself and the Galatians together might receive the adoption of Sons therefore the Gentiles were under the Law when Christ was sent forth for their redemption And our Saviour tells us what he was commissionated to by his Father Luke 4.18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me because he hath anointed me to preach the Gospel to the poor he hath sent me to heal the broken-hearted to preach DELIVERANCE TO THE CAPTIVES and recovering of sight to the blinde to set at liberty them that are bruised or bound as it is in Isai 61.1 to preach the acceptable year of the Lord that is the Year of Jubilee when all servants were set free thus Christ's coming was to proclaim a Year of Jubilee to the whole world that the Law 's Captives should be delivered and those that served God under the tyranny of the Law might receive a spirit of Adoption So now thus farr we are gone in our proof of the first assertion that when Christ came as a Saviour and Redeemer of his people he found them all under the Law as the lawfull Captives and Prisoners unto it by reason of their sins which were
is also called the Promise Faith then is made void the Promise made of none effect Rom. 4.14 And lastly to mention no more the Promises is the Law then against the Promises of God Gal. 3.21 the verbs To him that worketh not but believeth his Faith is counted unto him for righteousness Having given this Muster-Roll as it were of both parties I come now to some other Positions the first was this viz. 1. That there are but these two ways imaginable of fication there are but two sorts of Righteousness and so but two ways by which men do or with pretence of reason can seek Justification in else there had been more mentioned by the Apostle The second position is this 2. That these two wayes are quite opposite one to the other and inconsâ—stent one with the other that is as to the Justification of the same man at the same time nay if a man doth but seek to be justified by the one he cannot be justified by the other at the same time This opposition I have argued out for me expresly by the Apostle Rom. 11.6 If by Grace then it is no more of works otherwise Grace is no more Grace but if it be by works then it is no more of Grace oâ—herwise work is no more work Rom. 4.4 5. Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of Grace but of Debt but to him that worketh not but believeth his Faith is counted for righteousness 3d. Position is this The way of works was once and still in its own nature is a way of justification Rom. 7.10 The Commandment was ordained to be unto life yea this way was the ancient and the first of the ways of God in his dealing with man and seems to be natural and necessary to the primitive Estate of mankind For God made made man upright in his own Image of knowledg righteousness and true holiness and gave him the Law though not written in Tables of stone yet in his heart which was better else it had not been sinne to have committed Murther Adultery Stealth false-witness bearing Perjury Idolatry and what not in the Estate of innocency for where there is no Law there is no transgression God gave man a Law and surnished him with ability to have hept it to a tittle so that if he would he might have had the works of the Law to shew for himself The way of Justification by the â—aw unsolded and aâ—gued to be the first natural way of juslification at what time soever the Creator should have called him to account and all the time he and others had kept themselves innocent and holy they must have been acceptable to God he would have had respect to them and their works and they would have obtained this Testimony from God that they pleased him which was all that Enoch who was too good to live in the World had to shew for his justification And this had been enough for Adam or any other man to have produced for their Justification if Satan had at any time turned Accuser And thus living according to the Will of God they should have continued in the favour of God and perhaps after some term of years have been translated to some more happy an estate Then they might have gloryed without sinning that is they might have pleased themselves with such thoughts and speeches as these Happy are we that we took heed and care to please God and kept our selves innocent for now have we obtained a glorious reward we might have ruined our selves as we see the Angels have done We had a Power to have started aside from God but we have kept our selves from that mischief Such an innocent glorying as this and no higher glorying can I imagine lawful even in such a state was not forbidden by the Law of Works it was not excluded Rom. 3.27 Thus we see Justification is a a thing feasible and attainable by works by the Law if a man have the works of it Our Saviour and the elect Augels were justified by the Law Yea our Saviour Christ had the Works of the Law and the Law justified him and the Angels that kept their first estate they were doubtless approved by the Law of their Creation and had all the Apostate Angels turned Devils and false Accusers of them as they are of the Brethren their Works would have justified them in the sight of God Not that the good Angels had no other reward but what a Covenant of Works would allow and before the world though I say not that the good Angels have no other reward but what a Covenant of works allots But I doubt not to affirm That the good Angels were justified and rewarded by a Covenant of Works in as much as there was a full trial made when the other Angels fell of their voluntary obedience So that the Law in it self hath not only a power to justifie and reward but hath actually rewarded the observers of it those that had the righteousness of it Yea all the Work of our redemption by Christ was brought about onely with the good leave of the Law Christ must make a recognition and publikely own the Authority and Majesty that was still remaining in the Law acknowledgement must be made how that that had been offended and some reparation must be made unto the glory of God which was much impaired as it is a revenue from us in the transgression of the Law And this was the onely way decreed by God that the Law must satisfie it self upon him whosoever would undertake our Redemption and then the Law must justifie him all which it did upon our Saviour Which proves the unquestionable Power and Authority that the Law had in it to justifie man had he but the works of it But now let any man or Angel but sin If the â—aw be once broken in a tittle it can justifie no longer and the Law can justifie him no longer if he have but the least failing in obedience the Law can onely condemn this person Man or Angel whoever he be but I shall limit my self to mankind For this take that Scripture Gal. 3.10 Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the Book of the Law to do them So that if a man hath once sinned and yet seeks to be justified he must not seek justification by the righteousness of the Law any longer there comes a necessity of Grace Pardon Mercy which the Law hath not in it the Law hath no such thing as Grace or Pardon in it The Law onely saith He that doth them shall live in them and he that doth them not is accursed Now this Grace Mercy and Pardon which a man comes to have a necessity of upon his first breach of the Law is in the way of Faith which I have proved to be the opposite way of Justification to that of the Law It is of Faith saith the Apostle
is every one that continueth not in all things that are written in the Book of the Law to do them Gal. 3.10 2dly The Law is taken in a sence all as large as this is strict and that is for the whole Old-Testament So it is likewise taken in several Scriptures Gal. 4.21 Tell me ye that desire to be under the Law do ye not hear the Law For it is written that Abraham had two sons c. where the whole Book of Genesis is made a part of the Law again in Rom. 3. the Apostle makes the Psalms a part of the Law where having quoted a great part of the 14. Psalm in the 19. ver saith he Now we know that whatsoever things the Law saith c. and so in other Scriptures Now to apply the distinction in answer to the last query The Law strictly taken for a Covenant of Works did only teach Christ virtually and by consequence as it taught them that they could not be justified by its righteousness and thus for ought I know the Law in its accusations taught Christ to the Gentiles as it convinced them of the insufficiency of their own righteousness But now the Law in the second sense as taken for the Scriptures of the Old Testament taught Christ formally and directly though more obscurely then the Gospel teacheth him viz. in Types and Prophecies it were endless to reckon up all the Types Promises and Prophesies of Christ that are in the Old-Testament This way indeed the Law could not teach Christ unto the Gentiles who had not the Scriptures of the Old-Testament It is now high time and yet in this place seasonable enough to answer some other parts of the objection which I proposed at large some pages since which pleads for the Law its being a way of Justification unto the Jews at least before the coming of Christ if not to us now and something of that which remains yet unanswered Obj. 2. The Law was given to the Iews as their covnant is this If the Law was not given to be a way of Justification why is it called a Covenant the Old-Testament or Covenant 2 Cor. 3.14 and the first Covenant Heb. 7.8 expresly said to be made with the Children of Israel when the Lord took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Aegypt For whatever you have argued about Adam's estate of innocency that God made a Covenant of Works with him and that if he would he might have been justified by Works by the Law that since him all men have sinned and the Law was no way of Justification to them Whatever you have argued to this purpose say the objectors yet we find not that the Law was given to Adam but onely to the children of Israel by Moses and given to them as a Covenant therefore called the old Covenant or first Covenant in Heb. 8. out of Jer. 31.31 32.33 34. Therefore it was given them as a way of Justification for certainly the Justification that they were to seeke of God they were to seek in the way of a Covenant therefore in the way of the Law which was their Covenant To this I answer some things by way of concession A. 1. By way of concession in two particulars afterwards some things more concluding And first of all I grant that the Law is no where to my remembrance said to be given to Adam but onely to the children of Israel I am sure usually when mention is made of the giving of the law Where the law is said to be given it is to the children of Israel not to Adam Yet Adam had the Law and it was a Covenant of works to him 1. He had the Law it is likewise noted in the same place as given to the children of Israel by Moses so 2 Cor. 3 7. Heb. 8.9 1 Joh. 17. For the Law was given by Moses Gal. 3.19 Wherefore then serveth the Law It was added because of transgressions and it was ordained by Angels upon Mount Sinai in the hands of a Mediator viz. Moses Though when I make this concession that the Law is not said to be given to Adam but to the children of Israel by Moses I still think it may be easily collected from the Scriptures that Adam had the Law too and that it was to him a Covenant of Works 1. That he had the Law for 1. if Adam as a creature had not the Law written in his heart how came the Gentiles who had not the Law given them by Moses to have it written in their hearts 2. Else as I urged it before it had been no sin for man in innocency to have killed whom he pleased to have lyed forsworn himself to have defiled his own body by Adultery or other uncleanness for where there is no Law there is no transgression 3. If Adam had not the Law before his fall how came he to have it written in his heart presently after as it is certain he had for all other men have it so written and I cannot think that Adam alone wanted this excellency of all mankind neither do I think that he got this advantage by his fall to have the effect of the Law written in his heart which he had not written there before therefore he had it written in his heart before the Fall 2 It was to him a Covenant of works 2. It was a Covenant of Works to Adam in innocency For Adam then had no need of Grace or Pardon before his fall and I have proved that the Law is in its own nature a Covenant of Works and Adam had the Law therefore it was a Covenant of Works to Adam I deny not but Adam might have some positive Laws in his Covenant of Works as we find one viz. that of the forbidden fruit My second Concession is this That the Law was given to the Jews as a Covenant 2d Concession and where-ever mention is made of the Old-Covenant or First Covenant the parties covenanted withall are the people of the Jews So it is in 2 Cor. 3.6.14 in the 6. ver we have mention made of the New-Covenant which is that made by Christ in preaching the Gospel and in the 14th of the Old-Testament or Covenant which is that made with the Jews So in Heb. 8.6 7. the first Covenant is that which Moses was the Mediator of the second or better Covenant is that which Christ is the Mediator of this must not cannot be denyed and I have been often offended at persons that when they make a distinction of the Covenants a first and second old and new they make the first that with Adam in innocency the second the Covenant of grace made with the faithful ever since this though it may be true Divinity yet is not Scriptural or if it be somewhat Scriptural yet it is onely to be drawn by consequence out of the Scripture But there is another determination in this business that is more plainly
this legality lies of what it consists which men are so generally inclinable unto and this is the chief thingin the Conviction this I shall dispatch in three Propositions the first is negative shewing what it is not yet ought to be if they understood what they go about 1. It is not a professed putting themselves upon the Law of God strictly as it requires perfect unerring obedience for Justification so the Jews durst not adventure their souls the Jews acknowledged themselves sinners though not such sinners as the Gentiles We find when the Jews brought the Woman to Christ that was taken in Adultery he set the Woman at liberty by this Sentence of stoning her He that hath no sin let him 〈◊〉 the first stone Neither did the Galatians assert themselves free from sins alas they had been sinners of the Gentiles Gal. 4.8 They had been Idolaters and accordingly the Apostle disputes against them with such arguments as took that pro confesso that they were sinners Gal. 3.10 Is many as are of the works of the Law are under the curse for it is written Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the Book of the Law to do them Now surely as it might be supplyed you will not pretend to have continued in all things therefore you cannot expect to be justified by the works of the Law Though I must needs say this If they had gone wisely to work in their seeking Justification by the Law they must first have found themselves free from sin hitherto of their lives together with a power of keeping themselves free for the remainder of their lives or else must have desisted in the beginning and therefore the Apostle batters down their high imaginations of self-righteousness with such arguments as these The Law saith Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things now you have not continued in all things And in Rom. 3.19 20. when the Apostle had recited a Catalogue of sins out of the Law he infers Now we know that whatsoever things the Law saith it saith to them that are under the Law and so to you Jews especially that every mouth may be stopped and all the world may become guilty before God As much as to have said As for all these sins some are found in one and some in another and where-ever any of them is found there that man's mouth is stopped by the Law and every such person is become guilty or subâ—ect to the Judgement of God 20. Therefore by the deeds of the Law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight for by the Law is the knowledge of sin the Law tells you what is sin and so the wrath due to sin and by the Law every transgrestion should receive a just recompence of reward And so Gal. 5.3 I testifie again to every man that is circumcised which was the usual sign of their going off to the Law that he is a debtor to do the whole Law And yet this you dare not undertake O ye Galatians this you dare not profess to do A strange Dispensation that they gave themselves that they would aim to be justified by the Law and yet not hold themselves obliged to keep the whole Law How could they ever think that the Law should justifie them and yet these arguments brought by the Apostle to convince them both shew that they did not pretend to answer the Law byunerring obedience and fulfilling of it as also that they should have done thus had they gone wisely to work So much for the first Proposition shewing what their way was not yet ought to have been had they understood themselves 2. Yet though they did not profess to appeal to a strict Covenant of Works for Justification and did not understand themselves in what they did yet by the way that the Jews Galatians took for righteousness they fell under that way of Works were so reckoned by God to be and by the Apostle in his Discourses against them else his Arguments had concluded nothing against them And the reason is this for that though they did not formally intend a Covenant of Works yet the way they took was of that nature and tendency and we have a distinction in the Schools of sinis Scientiae Scientis now the sinis Scientiae is eternal and unalterable as proceeding from the nature of the thing let the finis Scientis be what it will so if the way they took be legal it is no matter whether they intended it or no. But you will say What was that in their way or what is that in this way which you say men usually taken which makes it so justly and unavoidably be called and reckoned by God a putting our selves under a Covenant of Works though we are not our selves aware of it I answer in the third and last place 3dly Wherein Legality consists positively It is such a mixture of the Covenant of Works with the Covenant of Grace as in which the Covenant of Works is predominant and so most justly gives the denomination to their way I fix upon the Word Predominant For else as I shal shew anon all the Saints have some legal mixtures in their Spirits even whilst they treat God for their justification and acceptation but because they are byassed and swayed more by Evangelical Principles then by Legal they are after the Spirit not after the Flesh in the business of Justification I shewed in the first Proposition that the Jews and Galatians did not profess themselves perfectly holy and so durst not appeal to the Law in a strict sense for a righteousness I shall now further shew how in many things it appears that these Legallists even whilst such did profess and adhere to the Gospel which is the way of Grace and then that yet by reason of their Legal mixtures all their Gospel was soured to them and turned into so much Law and they are no longer to be reckoned for Christians but the Disciples of Moses in Gal. 5.2 3 4. There are three proofs of this together that they were great professors of the Gospel when yet at the same time the Apostle disputes against them as adhering to a Covenant of Works for Justification Ver. 2. Behold I Paul say unto you That if ye be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing Here you see they thought to have had some profit and benefit by Christ Now this was a great mixture of Gospel in their way for if hope of benefit by Christ be not Gospel what is Nay you may see in another place of this Epistle that they had hope in the death of Christ which certâ—inly is a mixture of the Gospel with their Legal way Gal. 2.21 If righteousness come by the Law as your way leads you to say then Christ is dead in vain but you will not allow that Christ died in vain you hope for benefit from the death of Christ notwithstanding your cleaving to
He that is righteous let him be righteous still which two places the Doctor makes use of for proof But that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 should have these significations where the Apostle is strictly speaking to the business of Justification I can by no means allow yea I think it most abhorrent from the Apostles designe in this business what saith the Apostle Rom. 3.11 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there is none righteous no not one here the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith Rom. 1.17 There is no other righteousness takes place here And to rip up the whole business again which here I am put upon by the Doctor 's assertion and interpretations though otherwise I might have gone on smoothly in my way First of all surely the Doctor will not deny that Justification and Sanctification have different proper conceptions and notions which they are to be understood by that Justification is God's pardoning our sins and receiving our persons into special love and favour that Sanctification is a mans likeness to God in his heart and life or if the Doctor should deny this there are several places will evidence it I shall name but two Acts 13.38 39. Be it know unto you therefore Men and Brethren that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins and by him all that BELIEVE are justified FROM ALL THINGS from which yee could not be justified by the Law of Moses That is saith Dr Hammond shall certainly be freed and purged from the wrath of God and the punishments attending sin in another world from which the Law of Moses could not by all its Ceremonies Washings and Sacrifices purge or cleanse us The other Scripture shall be that in Janes 12.24 Yee see then how that by works a man is justified and not by faith onely Take Justification here for sanctification and let any one see if he can make sence of it nay it is plain in that Chapter that Justification is taken for being highly approved of God and being made the friend of God ver 25. And the Scripture was fulfilled which saith Abraham believed God and it was imputed unto him for righteousness and then as it were exegetical of that expression it is added he was called the friend of God But I know the Dr will allow of the particular without this proof That Justification and Sanctification have these different and proper conceptions mentioned 2dly Certainly the Dr. will allow that the Apostle Paul hath a mighty vigorous and curious Discourse concerning Justification in its proper notion or its foreusal acception as the Dr himself expresseth it pag. 379. ad finem The Apostle forms a professed Discourse nay a Dispute with the Jew and Judaizing-Gentile upon the business of Justification taken for Divine approbation they thought to obtain the favour of God one way but he shews them another These two particulars I shall take for granted Now I proceed 3dly The Apostle therefore being to remove one way of Justification viz. that of the Legallist and to set up another he makes mention of two Righteousnesses one of the Law the other of Faith That of the Law as I have shewed in the beginning of this Treatise is a perfect conformity to the Law perfect inherent righteousness unerring obedience this saith the Apostle no man hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there is none righteous no not one and the Apostle in that third chap. of the Rom. by enumerating all sorts of sins which we are all more or less guilty of proves that no man can be jusâ—â—ed by the Law this righteousness therefore the Apostle having fully removed as an impossible unattainable thing he as a Messenger from heaven substitutes another righteousness which he calls Gods Righteousness in opposition to our own the righteousness of God is revealed that is that righteousness which God will accept and what is that why it is Faith The righteousness of God is revealed from Faith to Faith as it is written The Just shall 〈◊〉 â—aith Rom. 1.16.17 The scope of the Apostles Discourse I doubt not is this That God hath designed and determined that seeing men have lost their Original purity and to can no longer stand upon their own bottom he will take them off from it altogether and make them live a life of pure dependance upon himself and that is by faith which must have holiness of life attending it and those that come off to do this renounce themselves their own righteousness and all creature-dependencies and roll themselves and all their concerns upon him and upon his Son though their imperfections may be 〈◊〉 yet this their faith shall be imputed to them â—â—r righteousness which they may plead for their â—â—tilication according to the Law of the new Covenant and they shall pass for righteous men as truly iustified and approved as if they had perfectly kept the whole Law under which they were created especially since God had made provision otherways how thâ— honor of that Law might receive râ—â—â—ation viz. by the death of his Son upon the Cross And this I suppose is no santastical notion of Justification by Faith which I suppose the Dr. is chiefly set against and seeing how many wayer men had corrupted the Doctrine of Justification by Faith after he had solidly confuted their opinions betakes himself to that of his own which I dare say had no evil intention though I still affirm that it is most unhappily exprest and I cannot but read it with a great displeasure and indignation For to think that the Apostle should make so much to do to decry the design of a legal Righteousness which in truth was no other in it self but true and real onely it must be perfect holiness however the Legallists all along in their pursuit after the Righteousness of the Law minded nothing less I say for the Apostle to dispute so vigorously against a Righteousness by perfect unerring obedience under the name of one's own righteousness and to set up Faith as Gods righteousness and yet that this righteousness of saith should signifie nothing else but those poor inconsiderable effects of Faith in holiness of life which the greatest part of Christians attain unto onely this seems a mean business for the Apostle to labour about Alas 't is true Faith works holiness and all the great Legallists shall never attain by all their stir and ado to so much true holiness as the meanest believer attains unto but yet this which we attain though by faith is nothing to give name to a righteousness in the sight of God for Justification to be justified by or for our holiness of faith is a low and base expression of Gospel-Justification The righteousness of Faith is an higher thing when a man comes off from himself and from all Creature-dependencies and professeth to live upon the Power and Goodness and Faithfulness of God and the blood spirit of Christ alone such a
unerring obedience faith was but a part of our duty which we owed to God under the first Covenant that is relying upon the power goodness and veracity of God and therefore where-ever faith comes to be our righteousness or our chief righteousness it argues that there is a great deficiency in the creature that is so to be justified and accordingly the Apostle often glances upon this that glorying is in this way excluded not by the law of works but by the law of faith Faith therefore cannot justifie by any natural excellency that it hath in it for though all the men in the world being now sinners and obnoxious to punishment by the law of their creation should resolve of their own accord to believe that there is so much goodness in God that he will not destroy the work of his own hands so depending upon his mercy and therefore they will endeavour to do all those things which they think may be pleasing and acceptable to him why all this faith and confidence attended with the most sincere obedience will not extort a Justification from Almighty God except it be in his good pleasure to justifie such believers and such obedient persons because they were all obnoxious to punishment for the breach of his law Faith therefore cannot justifie but by reason of divine ordination and constitution that hath passed upon it such as this The just shall live by faith and That if thou confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead thou shalt be saved Rom. 10.9 and for this reason I suppose it is so often called Gods righteousness Rom. 10.3 because it was a righteousness not in its own nature as works were but a righteousness purely of divine appointment This is Mr John Goodwin's notion of it Pag. 34. of the Banner of Justification displayed God was pleased to decree or make this for a law which the Apostle calleth the law of faith Rom. 3.27 that faith or believing in him through Christ should interesse men in the benefit or blessing of the death and blood shed of Christ that is in that remission of sins which was purchased by his death And in this consideration faith justifieth viz. by virtue of the Soveraign authority of that most gracious Decree or Law of God wherein he hath said or decreed that it shall intitle men unto or inright them in part and fellowship of that benefit of the death of Christ which consisteth in the forgiveness of sins or which comes much to the same as it is a qualification or condition ordained covenanted or appointed by God to bring upon those in whom it shall be found the great blessing of that pardon of sin which Christ hath obtained for men by his blood This is Mr Baxter's opinion too that is That saith justifies as it is made the chief condition of the N. Covenant Page 225 of his Aphorisms Thesis 57. It is the act of faith which justifieth men at age and not the habit yet NOT AS IT IS A GOOD WORK this is directly against Dr Moor's affirmation who faith that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is nothing else but to be approved as a good man or a doer of that which is righteous and good and that BECAUSE he doth that which is good and righteous methinks here is a Justification for good works purely and if faith comes in here to justifie it doth it only as it is a good work Mr Baxter is of another minde viz. That faith doth not justifie only under that quaâ—enus or reduplication AS a good work Faith saith Mr Baxter in the Thesis quoted doth not justlfie AS it is a good work or as it hath in it self any excellency above other graces But in the NEAREST SENSE DIRECTLY AND PROPERLY as it is the fulfilling the condition of the New Covenant c. But now though I have affirmed that it doth not justifie purely from its own nature Though faith doth not justisie purely from it's own nature yet it hath a great excellency in it self which might somewhat recommend it to this service but chiefly from the ordination of God and that it could not have justified without this ordination yet I shall adde that it had in its own nature a great fitness to be chosen of God for this eminent service to justifie men by It was the fittest medium that we can imagine when the first natural way of works failed to promote the honour of God and the good of the creature in Justification which consideration commends highly the wisdom of God in setting it apart for this use as the chief condition of our Justification To evince the truth of this let us consider a little the natural excellencyes that there are in faith And first of all faith takes in all spiritual objects 1 Excellency of Faith and represents them to the soul so that all other graces are beholden to faith for their objects Heb. 11.1 Faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen hope could not be if faith did not give a real and evident being and subsistence to the things that we hope for as also to all other the invisible and unseen things which a Christian a Saint as such converseth with and lives upon Again ver 6. of that chap. 11. Without faith 't is impossible to please God For he that comes unto God must believe that he is Now it is by faith that we believe and know that God is ver 27. by faith Moses forsook Egypt not fearing the wrath of the King for he endured as seeing him who is invisible by faith Moses saw him that is invisible I will acknowledge that reason may finde out that there is a God but if a mans wayes please God his reason delivers over this observation to his faith which is an higher thing an higher principle in the soul then reason though it never contradicts true reason yet it is somewhat above meer reason * If any one here will say that faith in such a case as the belief that there is a God is much the same with reason or a rational conviction of the truth of such a Proposition I will not much contend only because here the divine Penman sayes it is by saith we believe there is a God and his assertion must have a truth in it we may distinguish Reason Faith thus That Faith is a more particular faculty or habit of divine principles such as respect God and Religion but Reason is a more general faculty conversant about all objects whatsoever and this consideration must come in That meer Reason only makes one a man but Faith makes a man a Saint and therefore this Faith must have a divine afflatus and spirit in it beyond meer reason It is by faith that we believe that God is and that he is a rewarder of all them that diligently seek him And these two
the Cross and Christ nailed the Law to the Cross and all this without violence or affront offered to the Law it being but naturally consequent upon what the Law did first to Christ for if the Law set upon Christ as our Surety and do the utmost to him that it can it must needs follow that it hath no strength left against those for whom he undertook and so must die and expire by the same death that our Saviour dyed it being nailed to the Cross which is but a sigurative expression And yet I shall carry the Allegory a little further herein still following the Apostle Paul Is it any wonder now is it any unreasonable thing now that the Law is dead and taken out of the way that we should be married to another husband that we should reckon our selves to be no longer under the Law The woman which hath an husband saith the Apostle Rom. 7.23 is bound by the Law to her husband so long as he liveth but if the husband be dead she is loosed from the Law of her husband So then if while her husband liveth she be married to another man she shall be called an adulteress but if her husband be dead she is free from that Law so that she is no adulteress though she be married to another man ver 4. Wherefore my brethren ye also are become dead to the Law or the Law is become dead to you BY THE BODY OF CHRIST that ye should be warried to another even to him that is raised from the dead that we should bring forth fruit unto God The Law is every soul's first Husband since the fall so every one's actual sin the Law is an intolerable husband there is no living with it it so sets on guilt presseth the soul w th terrors nay instead of producing good works the natural fruit of this Marriage-relation of the Soul to the Law whilest in innocency it now produceth all manner of lusts according to the 5. ver of that 7. chap. When we were in the flesh the MOTIONS OF SINS WHICH WERE BY THE LAW did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death Now God in much mercy to mankinde finding that if the Law and the conscience or soul of man keep together his creature will be lost and himself lose those fruits of good works which the soul was first created for he provides another husband for the soul which is Jesus Christ only Christ must redeem his Spouse from that tyrannical Husband which now it lives with else the Soul shall be but an Adulteress to pretend marriage to Christ that is the way of grace whilest the Law can make a just claim to her as a wife which it might have done as long as it lived The manner of the rescue I have before declared it was by suffering and yielding to the Law yet so as in it the Law destroyed it self and then is it lawfull for the Soul that was before wife to the Law to be married to another husband and who so fit as he that redeemed her Now the Soul shall have it's forbearance under failings which the Law would not endure and God shall have a kindly and ingenuous Service there will be fruits unto God and this is the passage from Works to Faith from the Law to Grace I though the Law saith the Apostle am dead to the Law that I might live to God Gal. 2.19 that is through what the Law hath done to Christ it hath nothing to do with me But now we are delivered from the Law that being dead wherein we were held that we should serve in newness of spirit and not in the oldness of the Letter Rom. 7.6 One Scripture more to this purpose it is Rom. 8.1 23.4 There is therefore now no condemnation to ohem which are in Christ Jesus who are married to Christ and have accepted the terms of the Gospel who walk not after the Flesh but after the Spirit for the Law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the Law of sin and death this chiefly relates to sanctification that the inward law or power of corruption which was occasionally and accidentally strenghtned by the Law of God was now broken by that inward power spirit and life which is conveyed by the Gospel of Christ and is called the spirit of life which is in Christ Jesus ver 3. for what the Law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh that is it could neither justifie nor sanctifie both these did God bring to pass by sending his Son in the likeness of sinfull flesh when for sin that is Christ's making himself a Sin-offering so answering the Law God condemned Christ in the flesh that is destroyed it both in the guilt and power of it out of us that were sinners so it follows that the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us who walk not after the flesh but after the spirit that is that the Law might no longer accuse us being answered by our Saviour and that we might attain to that which is the chief designe of the Law to wit righteousness and holiness which if we had continued under the Law we could never have attained unto What so common now with the Apostle in the Epistle to the Romanes as to tell them that now they are not under the Law but under grace by this means namely the BODY OF CHRIST offered and that therefore there shall be no condemnation and that therefore sin shall not have dominion over them which are the two great effects of the death of Christ though the first chiefly belongs to that subject which I am upon viz. Justification Having given now all these things in an allegorical and mystical dress yet herein only following the Apostle I shall deliver the same thing somewhat plainly and so conclude this first particular The summe of all this is Man was made holy had a Law to live by to which there was a threatning annexed In the day thou eatest thou shalt die the death or shalt surely die * This threatning I take it is due by the Law to intended against all sins according to that of the Apostle The wages of sin is death Ro. 6.23 speaking of sin indefinitly besides wise Adam might have committed any other sin and not have dyed Man did eat and so was to die death accordingly entred by this sin into the world that is a natural death and for eternal death hereafter and the spiritual death of the soul here which consist's in alienations from God both which all men at age are obnoxious unto being sinners as for children I neither affirm nor deny any thing the Lord in mercy designing to deliver men from provided a Saviour who should first live a perfect life that so he might be the more acceptable Sacrifice and his terms of saving men must be these that he must freely offer himself up to
God a Sacrifice for our sins give his life a ransome c. and though the Father loved him all the while as I cannot admit that the Father was really angry with Christ or that he tasted the Fathers wrath for God could never be angry with one that never displeased him yet undertaking such a load as our sins the Father would deal with him much like as with a sinner leave him to men and devils upon the Cross and with-draw the light of his countenance which forced those sad out-cryes upon the Cross Now upon condition of Christ's performing this great service which was as I verily believe the chiefest designe of his coming into the world for this cause came I to this hour John 12.27 though there were divers other great designes of his coming I say upon condition of performing this great service the great God of heaven would reckon that his word of threatning was fulfilled and the holiness of his Law satisfied in this eminent signification of his displeasure against sin shewn upon his own Son whom he would not spare when he had taken our sins upon him and for ever after would grant this new and living way of Justification unto the world THAT WHOSOEVER SHOULD BELIEVE AND OBEY SINCEREEY should be justified and saved and that for all such they should be no longer under the Law for their Justification but under Grace And I can understand no other sense of the Law 's being dead and Grace it's reigning through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ I shall only need to minde one thing before I go off from this particular The subjects of the great Priviledge of freedom from the Law and that is the subjects of this priviledge of freedom from the Law And they are only so many as put themselves upon the way of believing for Justification all others are really under the Law still When we were in the flesh the motions of sins which were by the Law did work in our members c. Rom. 7.5 All that are in the flesh are under the Law still But now saith the Apostle we are delivered from the Law that being dead wherein we were held The Law was alive before to their conscience whilest they were in the flesh and out of Christ but now the Law was become dead to them which plainly argues that the Law is dead or alive to men in the condemning power of it according to the state that a man is in either of sin or holiness So Rom. 6.14 For sin shall not have dominion over you for ye are not under the Law but under Grace plainly implying that if they were under the Law sin would have dominion over them an also that if sin had dominion over them it were a plain signe that they were under the law This being a great truth in this matter That all that are not serving God in the way of faith are under the law for that the law is the natural way which a man is born under and the way of faith and grace a superadded dispensation upon consideration of the death of Christ for all those that should believe and obey sincerely therefore till they get into the way of believing they must be in that state which men are naturally born under that is under the law I shall conclude this particular with a passage about Dr Preston I have heard it affirmed by one that was contemporary with Dr Preston in Cambridge a person of credit and worth that he heard him preach to this purpose That Christ dyed to make this Proposition true that WHOSOEVER BELIEVETH SHALL BE SAVED Now this I suppose is full to the purpose for proof of what I am upon That Christ dyed to buy a people off from the law that they might be justified by faith he dyed to buy those off from the law that should prove believers as for all others he leaves them to the law still For Christ did not dye to get the law annihilated or made utterly void Do we make void the law God forbid saith the Apostle Rom. 3.31 but he laid down his life for HIS SHEEP and to save HIS PEOPLE from their sins he bought them off from the law such as St Paul I through the law am dead to the law but not for wicked men that is such as continue so they shall finde the law alive to them and full charged with wrath against them it being nothing else but the holy will of the great God unto which all his creatures owe an exact conformity Now by what hath been said I suppose is plainly and fully proved that which I made my first assertion viz. That Christ Jesus in his own person here upon earth underlook and answered the law for all believers so that they may be justified for any accusation that the law hath to charge them with and thus they come under grace and into this easier and sweeter way of Justification in a comly manner the law being honourably taken off So that now God may be just that is mercifull saith Dr Hammond upon the place and the justifier of every one that believes in Jesus Rom. 3 24 25 26. He may now justifie the ungodly Rom. 4.5 which by the law if that had not been taken off by Christ he could not I think have done Methinks what I have said should be a clear proof of this assertion seeing I have not only proved that it is so but shewn out of the Scripture the very manner how the law was taken off All that I can apprehend to remain any whit doubtful or questionable is this How doth it appear that what Christ did in suffering under the law being under the curse c. did reach to the times that were before Christ's coming into the world it may be easily conceived how it makes clear way for our Justification by faith who have lived since his death for if he bare our sins the law will not charge them upon us if he dyed for us or in our stead we are not by the law to die if Christ were sacrificed for us as our Passover we need not fear if we have the Gospel-conditions of Covenant-relation to God in Christ but the destroying law will pass over us see how the word Passover comes from passing over Exod. 12.21 23 27. But how doth it appear that this death of Christ had this influence upon the times of the Old Testament to bring in the way of Justification by faith to them for that you have asserted that the way of Justification by faith hath been in all ages both before the law and under the law as well as now in the dayes of the Gospel and that none was ever justified in any other way Now how were they taken off from the law and brought under Justification by faith or how doth it appear that the death of Christ was the foundation of this way of Justification by faith even to them And unto the
heat of contention it were a worthy design in any man that were able to endeavour their reconciliation to each other if all means have not been used and especially considering that there is no other thing requisite in order to it but a right state of this or these two questions Whether and if so How farr Evangelical Works have an influence upon the justification of a sinner I say there is nothing else necessary to the ending of the controversies between all these but the stating of this question and the honest attending to such a state given For that all the parties agree upon the same things for matter viz. That we must believe and that we must do good Works and that to our utmost only one saith Evangelical Works have a share in our justification another sayes they have none one sayes they signifie so much another but so much none deny that good works are to be done I might mention another difference in opinion concerning faith in justification and that is concerning what kinde of faith it is that is the condition of our justification whether only that faith that hath a direct and express respect to Christ and his death or else all acts of faith whatsoever upon the power goodness and faithfulness of God as well as that upon Christ and his blood I hope I have in some of these things added one mire at least unto the treasury of Knowledg or else I were very impertinent indeed But this was not my design in composing this Treatise to give a state of such questions and therefore what I have done of such a kinde I have cast at the end of my Book as not being chiefly intended nor indeed intended at all at first but only as I found that it would be necessary to say something upon them Or if I had desired to engage in such a designe these several reasons might have discouraged me First that it required vast abilities to undertake it Secondly That I thought it had been very well performed by Mr Baxter already and Thirdly That though any should be judiciously satisfied that he could give a better state than yet had been given he might very well doubt how it would be entertained amongst the contenders when Mr Baxter of whom I have heard a very learned and godly Person say of late That he would shine in heaven for his book of Aphorismes yet by it purchased the highest displeasure from his Presbyterian Brethren My design therefore was wholly of another nature for observing that the Subject was as well practical and experimental as disputable though there are very worthy and lofty speculations to be had about it I thought it the most efficacious way of ending the disputes about it at least of making it usefull to honest men leaving disputers to themselves to shew how it was practical and experimental and by how much the shorrer I was in my doctrine upon this Subject to be so much the larger in my application And indeed I must needs say I observed as I thought that those who had hitherto written upon this Subject were deficient in one great piece of Application Mr Baxter and others I thought had done excellent service against the Antinomians who have sadly provoked them in these late times both in the Pulpit and Press and their private suggestions and insinuations but then they were more sparing in using the two-edged sword of Truth in this Subject on that side where it should cut the Legalist whereas there was as much or more need to set themselves against them as against the Antinomian If we would learn what Legality was that we might avoid it we must go to the Antinomians there was little to be heard of this Subject amongst others though in the mean time they did most dangerously poison their Auditors and Disciples with false descriptions of Legality so that I have my self whilest formerly an Antinomian and an Enthusiast looked upon that to be as ugly as Hell and Damnation which I now receive for good wholsom and precious Evangelical truth I could well have approved of that saying of Luther formerly Operatores sunt Martyres Diabâ—li that is That those that do minde Works in the matter of Justification though Evangelical works so farr as they minde them they are the Devils Martyrs and bear their testimony by the anguishes of their spirit against the Righteousness of the Gospel and yet from such Teachers we must receive the notes of Legality others that are enemies to the Antinomians not offering at this Subject at least in that professed way as the Antinomians do This I looked upon to be a considerable defect especially when I observed that the Apostle Paul in his Epistles to the Romans and Galatians as also in some other places le ts out the chief of his zeal Rom. 61 2. VVhat shal we say then shall we continue in sin that grace may abound God forbâ—d So ver 15. Rom. 3.5 7 8. and useth the greatest strength of argument against this sort of men whereas he is but here and there sparingly touching upon the Libertine which I hold to be the practical Antinomian And as I said even now this Subject is a practical Subject and highly experimental yea every whit and rather more experienced in the inconveniences of Legality than of those of Antinomiansme For the Law and Grace contend for the dominion and mastery in every heart that but entertains the thoughts of Religion Now where the notion of Grace prevails in a right way there is the right Saint or Christian By this division thou maist if thou judgest necessary supply a member of a division that may seem to be wanting Pag. 117 118. where I have divided all Religious persons into two forts viz. Legal and Evangelical though were iâ— not for giving offence I might still leave the Antinomian that is the high practical Antinomian out of the number of Religious persons where it prevails in a wrong way without a due seriousness of heart there is Antinomianisme when the Law prevails there is Legality Now I verily believe that there are ten Legalists to one Antinomian for all the Superstitious world are Legalists and I have shewn in the following Treatise that there are many moral Legalists and there is evident reason why there may well be more Legalists than Antinomians for that with a little knowledge in Religion men may prove Legalists whereas to be Antinomians requires somewhat more than ordinary of notion in Religion besides there is another reason why there should be at least equal care taken if not more in the application of the doctrine of Justification for the searching and rooting out of Legality than there is to be had for the destroying Antinomianism because destructive Legality takes faster hold of men that are under it than destructive Antinomianisme doth For the Legalist that depends upon his external Priviledges or performances is not so easily beaten out of his hold as the
Joh. 37.10 Rom. 8.1 Besides the Apostle in his Epistle to the Romans where he is more large in the vindication of his Doctrine concerning Justification by Faith then elsewhere in any place speaketh expresly of the constituting i. e. of the actual making of men just or righteous c. 5.19 that is the investing men with the state of Justification but no where mentioneth any thing concerning the manifestation of such a state And the truth is that the contest about Justification wherein be ingaged against the Jews with so much zeal so much ardencie of desire to convince them with such variety of exquisite and ponderous arguing to bring the truth to light against which they contended with him the contest I say had hardly been worth all this oleum opera all this solemnitie and height of ingagement by such a man had it been onely about the manifestation and not about the way and means of procuring a justified estate An account of this assertion might be given if need were Another thing worthy consideration about the great Subject of the Treatise is whether if so why justification or Forgiveness of sins is ascribed as well to such acts of Faith which do not at least directly or immediately relate unto Christ or unto the death of Christ as unto these which do Thou wilt sinde here more produced from the Scriptures to prove the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of such an ascription then as farr as my reading and memory can inform me is to be met with elsewhere and as much said upon a rational and probable account for clearing the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or reason of it as may be sufficient to quiet the thoughts of men in the case For it doth not bear hard at all either upon the Wisedom of God or upon any of his words in the Scripture to conceive that any act from a believing frame or disposition of soul in man towards God should reduce him under the Divine Decree of Justification and so interesse him in the benefit or blessing hereof considering that every such act doth arguitive as the School-men speak that is virtually and consequentially comprehend in it such an act of believing also which is directly and immediately acted upon Christ or his death It is a rule in the Civil Law â—avores sunt ampliandi the meaning is that such passages or clauses in the Law which were intended in way of favour or benefit unto men ought to be interpreted in the largest and most comprehensive sense that the words will any way bear as on the other hand there is this rule In odiosis stricte facienda est interpretatio Such sayings in the Law which concern the punishment of persons in one kind or other are to be understood in as narrow and restrained a sense as the words will permit Doubtless these notions for the expounding of Laws both in the one case and the other are equitable agreeable to reason and the light of nature and consequently are to be found in the nature of God himself who as the Scripture informeth us made man in his own image or likeness and vested the same or the like principles or impressions of Reason Equity and Understanding in him with those that were in himself So that it need be no great matter of wonder that God should be very indulgent and large in interpreting such clauses in the Gospel which relate unto the justification and salvation of men and consequently should finde justifying Faith in such acts of believing which may any waies even by the most abstruse subtile or profound way of arguing be conceived to evince or comprehend it Whether upon every reiterated or repeated act of believing the believer is justified afresh if so what doth a supervenient act of Justification profit him that is perfectly justified already or how is there place for the effect of such an act as that of Justification in him all whose sins by means of his being in Christ are already pardoned by God or if not what should be the reason why one act of the same Faith should not justifie as well as another Are problemes worthy the consideration and inquiry of an ingenuous Student in the mysterious science of Justification These also or some of them are ingeniously discussed and endeavoured to be resolved in this Treatise Doubtless every new act of believing doth not procure or bring unto him that so acteth a new justification properly so called and which consisteth in remission of sins Nor is this any disparagement to an after-act of believing in comparison of any former or the first act in this kinde by which Justification in this sense was obtained nor doth it argue any whit less acceptance of it with God For as the saying in natural Philosophy is Quiequid recipitur recipitur ad modum recipientis the qualification or condition of the Subject doth often if not alwaies modifie the effect of the act that is exercised or acted upon it So he who by virtue of a former act of believing remains and is in a complete state of Justification all his sins being forgiven him by God is not capable of receiving the forgiveness of them at least in the same sense or kind the second time because he needeth iâ— not For it being unpossible for God in respect of the infinity of his Wisedom to do any thing superstuous no creature can be in a regular capacity of receiving any matter of grace or favour from him unless in one respect or other it standeth in need of it Every repeated act of Faith doth indeed obtain from God another kind of Justification I mean Approbation which is oft in Scripture expressed and this without any great acyrology or impropriety of speech by the word Justification For though men were approved of him before as well as justified yet Approbation being susceptive of magis and minus or of degrees which Justification strictly taken is not they may be oft approved yet not often in that sense justified their former justification remaining That forgiveness of sins which Christ teacheth us to ask of God dayly either imports the continuation of the first act whereby he justified us which it is meet we should ask of him in respect of our new and dayly transgressions or which I rather conceive yet with submission Gods forbearing to punish us with temporal punishments for our dayly sins being at liberty we know thus to punish us notwithstanding our justified estate if he be not intreated by us in this respect to forgive us Other great and high concernments the care of repeated acts of belicoing which are not proper to be mentioned here 〈…〉 in Christ or in God by means of Christ for the Scripture useth both expressions indifferently qualifieth and inricheth the soul with all principles of righteousness and goodness and so constitutes a person inherently just and righteous some of late have conceived that in this notion or consideration it justifieth and that God
that it might be by Grace the way of Grace is the way of Faith So that is the third assertion with its explication and proof The fourth Assertion is this That every man in the World hath broken the Law Rom. 3.23 For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God The Jews call the Gentiles by this Name The sinners of the Gentiles or of the Nations But what saith the Apostle speaking of the Jews of whom himself was one What then Are we better then they No in no wise For we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles that they are all under sin as it is written There is none righteous no not one v. 9 10. When the Jews brought a Woman taken in Adultery unto our Saviour to see what Judgement he would pass upon her he delivered the Woman by this sentence of stoning her Let him that hath no sin cast the first stone at her Now if there had then been but one there that durst pretend to have been without sin the Woman might perhaps have lost her life John 8.34 And we find it amongst our selves none but some brain-sick people dare pretend to be free from sin even actual sin committed in their own person either in deed word or thought at least Now if we have all thus offended the law and transgressed the law shall we dare appeal unto it or can it justifie us The fifth assertion therefore which determines the Question negatively is That the law is disabled from justifying us by reason of sin In Rom. 8.3 Justification is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that impossibility of the lavv translated thus What the Law could not do the lavv novv cannot do it according to that famous assertion of the Apostle Paul to this very purpose Gal. 3.21 For if there had been a Law given which could have given life verily righteousness should have been by the Law The Iavv cannot novv justifie and vvhat is the reason Why the Apostle tells us in Rom. 8.3 What the Law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh The law became thus disabled in the matter of Justification through the flesh through sinful flesh as appears by the following words so that now it could not justifie us if it would never so fain We can conceive no way now that the Lord hath to justifie by us the law but this one first to pardon then to give us a stock of grace ability to keep his law as he gave to Adam but then mark here you see first the way of Grace Faith must be made use of before the law can do us any good or stand us in any stead therefore still the fifth assertion holds true that the law in the present state of things cannot justifie us except the way of grace should first pass upon us and then what need vve come to the lavv again No it is so true that the lavv cannot novv justifie us nor give life unto us that if it could have done it it should have done it and God would not have made use of any other way I might now give several Scripture-proofs of this assertion under several Heads As 1. By the Law now comes onely the knowledge of sin Rom. 3.20 Therefore by the deeds of the Law there shall no flesh be justified for by the Law is the knowledge of sin Where-ever the Law comes now amongst sinners it discovers that they are guilty in such and such a particular I had not known sin saith the Apostle but by the Law for I had not known lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not covet Rom. 7.7 2. The Law worketh therefore Wrath therefore it cannot justifie this is the Apostles Argument Rom. 4. ver 15. Now the Law worketh Wrath these two ways either it setteth home the Wrath of God already deserved upon the Conscience or it gives occasion to further sinning and so to a further desert of Wrath for the Law hath this strange effect now upon a sinners heart that seeks to be justified by it that it will contrary to the first design of it which was to sanctifie justifie and save it will now stir up all manner of lusts in the heart as the Sun shining on a Dunghil sends forth a stink and so not onely discovers our former illdemerits and deserving of Wrath but provokes to further sinning so lays us under more wrath stil if this be not a truth let any make sence of these Scriptures if they can Rom. 7.8 9 10 11. Sintaking occasion by the Commandment wrought in me all manner of Concupisence for without the Law sin was dead for I was alive without the Law once but when the Commandment came sin revived and I dyed and the Commandment which was ordained to life I found to be unto death for sin taking occasion by the Commandment deceived me and by it slew me 13. Was then that which is good made death unto me God forbid but sin that it might appear sin working death in me by that which is good that sin by the Commandment might become out of measure sinful I know several of these expressions are and may be in part interpreted of sin in the guilt that it appears by the law but it must also be understood of the power of sin that the law discovers that likewise whilest it irritates and provokes it and I would fain know if there can be any other sence of that whole context from the 1. to the 7. ver of that chap. especially the 5. ver When we were in the flesh the motions of sin which were by the Law did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death 3. The law by both these effects discovering of sin and exciting sin as also shewing the Wrath due to sin is so far from justifying that it becomes the Ministration of Death and Condemnation to the sinner and not of justification unto life and for this we may consult the whole third Chap. of the second to the Corinthians My 6th Assertion therefore is this Faith is the way and the onely way that we have to take for Justification being sinners We must have Mercy Grace Pardon We must not think to stand upon our terms to require Justification as a due debt We must be glad to receive it as a gift and this is the way that Faith leads us in That Faith and Grace are one way I have proved before in reckoning up the several Synonymaes of those onely two wayes which the Apostle mentions Now that Faith is the onely way for us appears from what hath been already said and proved For if the law be no way and there be only these two wayes imaginable then there is no other way but this of Faith left us But I shall yet give one full Scripture-proof of this Rom. 3.21 Therefore by the deeds of the Law there shall no fiesh be justified in his sight but now the righteousness of God without
of the Law to bring them into desperation and there to leave them but by this desperation which indeed the Law was to bring them into to make them hunger and thirst after another righteousness then that of the law which by the law they might see they could not have to make them in love with the promises with any thing that looks like mercy and grace and in a word to direct them and drive them to Christ and a Gospel-Justification Gal. 3.24 The law was our School-master to bring us to Christ that we might be justified by Faith ver 22. The Scripture that is the Law hath concluded all under sin that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe 23. Before Faith came we were kept under the Law included as prisoners shut up unto the Faith which should afterwards be revealed Rom. 10.3 Christ is the end of the Law for righteousness unto every one that believeth So that indeed the Law was given not to undermine the promise but to serve the ends and honour of the promise The law entred not to preach a Legal Justification but an Evangelical The Law came into the world to confess its own impotency to save or justifie us as also to send and direct us to one that could according to that of Rom. 3.20.21.22 Therefore by the deeds of the Law shall no flesh be justified in his sight for by the Law is the knowledge of sin But now the righteousness of God without the Law is manifested being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets even the righteousness of God which is by Faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe The righteousness of God without the law is witnessed by the law There are other Scriptures to this purpose which I forbear to mention Thus the Law and the Gospel do mutually good turns for one another the Law preacheth the Gospel most effectually for men never well close with the Gospel till they feel the lash of the Law And the Gospel again most effectually establisheth and obligeth to the keeping of the Law for till men have a principle of faith they never have a living principle of obedience thus the elder which is the Law is made to serve the younger that is the Gospel but the Gospel hath an ingenuity in it to return the Law a due acknowledgement And the Law might well direct the sinner to Christ and preach Justification by Faith for this was the onely way of recovering its own honour and obedience which was due unto it Reas 1. Why the Law might well direct to Christ as appears in these three particulars First for that Christ personally fulfilled it to a tittle he lived a most perfect life and performed unerring obedience for more then thirty years together here amongst men upon earth and this is said by some Divines to be for the Justification of his own person and is known by the name of his active obedience 2. For those whom he was to save and redeem from under the law from under the punishments and penalties which were due to them for the breaches of it he underwent all that the law exacted from him as their Mediator till the law was fully satisfied 3. As for the persons themselves thus redeemed by the sufferings of an innocent and legally-righteous Saviour they are not owned by this Saviour to be his redeemed ones any further then as they acknowledg the perfect holiness of the law that they themselves are obliged as Creatures and the redeemed ones of Christ to endeavour to their utmost to keep the law still to a tittle and do actually perform a sincere obedience to it not dispensing with themselves in any command of it but bewailing their infirmities wherein they fall short of unerring obedience so that in the way of faith the law obtains its true end though not exactly in the persons justified yet in their Saviour Christ is the end of the law for righteousness Rom 10.4 Yea and in their persons thus far that they perform a sincere obedience and endeavour an unerring obedience to the law and thus the righteousness of the law is said to be fuifilled in them in as much as they walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit Rom. 8 4. So that now I have answered the great objection against Justification by Faith which was th s Wherefore then serveth the Law and that with some advantage to the present cause I have shewn that whatever the law was intended for in its delivery it was not given for a way of Justification because the way of faith was establisht before the reasons of its delivery were these 1. It was given to the Jews in mercy to shew them their duty more plainly then they could otherwise have known it by the light of nature or any other way of teaching which they had amongst them till that time that so they might not run into transgressions through ignorance and it was given with terror that they might not rush into transgressions through negligence and these two particulars made up the first end of the delivery of the law viz. to hinder transgressions from being committed 2. It was added to heighten transgressions in the guilt of them when they should be committed 3. Not to leave them in desparation but to direct them unto Christ and I have shewn that great advantage did accrue to the law this way that hereby it came to pass that though it was not fulfilled by the first Adam in the first giving of it yet it was all as well fulfilled by the second and every way recompensed and satisfied as if it had never been broken so that I reckon the Objection is quite taken off and may be retorted upon the objectors thus If they ask Wherefore then serveth the Law We answer It serveth to lead men unto Christ that they may be justified by Faith I have some things yet to add upon the two last last ends of the law 's being given which I thought not fit to insert in the first mention of them upon the second end of the law 's being given viz. for the aggravating of transgression and loading the Conscience with guilt I have this to add It is so true that the law was given to the Jews to make the offence to abound and to press the conscience with guilt that it had the same effect upon the Gentile World to whom it was not delivered as it was unto the Jews so saith the Apostle Rom 3. where when he had recited out of the Psalms a Catalogue of sins which the law doth condemn men for from the 10. to the 19. ver in that 19. ver Now we know saith he that whatsoever things the Law saith it saith to them who are under the Law that every mouth may be stopped and the whole world might be guilty before God Certainly the Gentiles are a part and the greatest part of the
essential branch of a New-Testament-faith 2ly His Intercession Secondly we are to look upon Christ as the procuring cause of all our mercies by his intercessions whereby he reaps the benefit of the purchase of his blood His Blood was the foundation of all his Intercession and his Intercession is as the harvest to that seed-time when he sowed in tears of blood He entred into the holy of holies by his own blood if he had not had that blood with him I conceive there had been no entrance for him there as a Priest but now that he is there entred and entertained as an High-priest for ever and ever liveth to make intercession for us Heb. 7.25 We are to look upon him as the great procuring-cause of all our mercies by his intercessions If when we were enemies we were reconciled unto God by the DEATH of his Son much more being reconciled we shall be saved by his LIFE Rom 5.10 1 John 2.1 My little children these things write I unto you that ye sin not and if any man sin we have an Advocate with the Father Jesus Christ the Righteous and he is the propitiation for our sins HE IS to this very day upon occasion of any failing of the Saints he interposeth to make God propitious to them and not onely to them saith the Apostle not onely for our sins who are the Saints of God but for the sins of the whole world He doth now as he did at his death and first entring into Heaven though not in the same form of offering which was but ONCE make use of his blood with his Father to prevail with him that he may be ready to pardon and receive into favour all that come unto God by him all that are come in upon any of their failings and all that shall come in with unfeigned repentance for their wicked lives past And as I shewed in the former particular of his death and blood that he did not onely procure pardon of sin by it but redeemed us from our vain conversation and purchased heaven it self for us so in this particular I might shew that he doth not onely procure pardon of sins for us by his intercession as our Advocate but every thing else that we stand in need of I am going to my Father saith our Saviour when he was leaving the World and there I will povide Mansions for you and whatsoever ye ask the Fther in my Name I will do it Joh. 14.2 3 13. Thus therefore our Faith if we would have it a right New-Testament Faith must eye Christ in his intercession and whatever we desire of God we must ask it in his Name and then believe that Christ as an Advocate with the Father wil take the care of it So much for the first Head or general Rule of a New-Testament-Faith We are to eye Christ as the great procuring cause of all our mercies 2dly 2 Gospel-faith eies Christ as the great dâ—spenser of all good things to us We are to look upon Christ as the great Dispenser of all our good things to us Our Saviour Christ hath the distribution disposal of all things committed to him as Joseph had in Aegypt The Father judgeth no man but all judgement is committed by the Father to the Son John 5.22 Jesus Christ is not onely represented unto us in the Scripture as standing at the right hand of God Act. 5.55 56. which may signifie his Advocatship and Priestly Office but much oftner as sitting at the right hand of God whch is a sign of his Kingly Office and Authority for this see Heb. 10 11 12 13. where sitting is opposed to standing as Maâ—esty is to Ministring And every Priest STANDETH daily MINISTRING and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices which can never take away sins But this man after he had offered one Sacrisice for sins for ever SATE DOWN at the right hand of God from henceforth expecting till his Enemies be made his footstool Our Saviour obtained of his Father by his death and offering not onely that sinners might be pardoned but that he might have the gift of pardon yea and of repentance too which is as great a gift as pardon it self Acts 5.30 31 32. The God of our fathers raised up Jesus whom ye slew and hanged on a Tree him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour for to give repentance to Israel and sorgiveness of sins and we are his witnesses of these things and so is the Holy Ghost whom God hath given to them that obey him In a word Christ hath all power both in heaven and in earth So our Saviour came and told his Disciples after he was risen Matth. 28.18 19. Jesus came and spake unto them the eleven saying All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth Go ye THEREFORE and teach all Nations This is the form of the Commission which makes an Apostle I have received power therefore go teach they are not the Apostles of God immediately but of Jesus Christ by the will of God 1 Cor. 1.1 2 Cor. 1.1 Eph. 1.1 To instance in the several branches of this power in heaven and earth would be too much for me in this place there is the power of pardoning sins raising the dead judging the world destroying the wicked These with many other I could prove by plain Scripture to be all deposited and be-trusted in the hand of Jesus Christ Now what is the Faith that belongs to Christ as the Dispenser of all good things to us for that is my proper business to enquire after Why even the Faith that we place in God the Father This Christ taught his Disciples when he was about to leave them Joh. 14.1 Let not your heart be troubled ye believe in God believe also in me As much as to say Ye have been used hitherto by your Old-Testament-Faith to believe in God and you have found comfort and support in it and yet you do not see that God you believe in Why so now for my self I am going in deed out of your sight and at this you are troubled but believe in me when I am out of your sight as ye have hitherto beheved in an invisible God and ye shall find the same comfort and support in this Faith as ever ye found from Faith in God None so common a New-Testament phrase as believing in Christ He that believeth in me though he weee dead yet shall he live and whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never dye Joh. 11.25.26 and our Saviour there giveth a very satisfactory reason The difference betwixt faith in Christ and in God the Father which is this I am the resurrection and the life therefore he that believeth on the Son hath life and shall have a resurrection unto lise Our Faith ought to be the same in the person of Christ as it is in God the Father onely with this difference that it must not be terminated in
transgressions of the Law Now therefore what remains but this that if Jesus will save his people from their sins if he will deliver the Law 's Captives he must make satisfaction to the Law The Law was such a thing as must not be dealt with in a way of violence 't is true when our Saviour came to redeem us from the power of Satan he did that by an holy violence he fought with all the powers of hell upon his Cross and conquered them by force of arms as I may speak and triumphed over them in himself or in his Cross but now the Law must be taken off in a more honourable way for the Law had an authority in it the Law was nothing but the will of God revealed for mans life with a reward and threatnings annexed so that the great God himself stood up in vindication of his own Law that if the Prisoners of it were rescued it must be upon such terms as these which appear what they were by the event That he that is the Saviour of the Law 's Captives must first be made under the Law himself The terms upon which the Law 's captives be delivered God sent forth his Son made of a woman made under the Law to redeem them that were under the Law And secondly That he must pass thorough a legal Justification himself before he can take others off from the Laws condemnation for being made under it the Law must either justifie him or condemne him which latter it did not for any personal breach that he made of it therefore it must and did acquit him But then for us who were under the curse of the Law if he will deliver us from it he must be made a curse Gal. 3.13 if he will save us from our sins which were invigorated by the Law with a sentence of condemnation all the strength of sin for condemnation being in the Law he himself must be made sin that is as much as an immaculate Lamb could be viz. a sin-offering 2 Cor. 5.21 he was made sin for us who knew no sin that we might be made the righteousness of God in him that is that we might be made righteous by Gods accepting Gospel conditions instead of legal for our Justification If Christ will redeem us from the wrath of the Law which is the wrath of God the Law worketh wrath Rom. 4 15. truely he must come under that wrath so farr as it was possible for such an innocent person to be under it and we know that he was under as horrible a desertion as ever any that trusted in God was under and that at such a time when he needed the greatest supports even when he hung upon the Cross crying My God My God words of an high saith why hast thou forsaken mee words expressing a most dreadfull desertion Math. 27 46. Not to mention his agony in the Garden which was but a fore-taste of that Cup which he was afterwards to drink off And methinks there is an eminent place for this in Zech. chap. 13. ver 7. saith the Lord there as it were stirring up his wrath against Christ Awake O Sword against my Shepherd and against the man that is my Fellow saith the Lord of Hosts As much as to say there is a man upon earth that is my Fellow and he hath undertaken to rescue the Law 's Captives to redeem them from under the Law Curse and Wrath now awake my Sword against him Here the great God the Lord of Hosts doth as it were set himself in battel array against Christ but what doth Christ now Doth he make resistance doth he redeem his Captives from the Law by forceâ— No though he were equal with God though he were God's Fellow as here the Lord calls him yet he made it not a prey or a robbery to be equal with God so as to hold it fast and stand it out but gave way he knew what he had undertaken to redeem Captives indeed but it was from under the Law the righteous and holy and pure law of God and this must not be violated this must not be resisted He had to do with his Father and there must be no resisting him The Cup which my Father hath given me shall I not drink it John 18.11 Though he were God's Fellow though he were equal to God as it is Phil. 2.6 7 8. Yet he made himself of no reputation he laid aside his equality took upon him the form of a Servant and humâ—â—ed himself and became obedient unto death even the death of the Cross And this was the utmost that the Law could do to him here the Law ended it's rage the Law brought Christ to the Cross and when he ascended the Cross he bare our sins in his own body 1 Pet. 2.24 and being as yet under the Law for the Law pressed him with our sins he carried up the Law as Sampson did the gates of the City upon his shoulders Judges 16.3 he carried up the Law upon the Cross he nailed the Law to the Cross both Moral and Ceremonial as to all it's condemning power as to all that wherein it was a gainst us wherein it was contrary unto us he answerit fully cancelled it and left it behinde him upon the Cross to this very day Christ came down again but the Law could never come down since Col 2.14 Blotting out the hand-writing of Ordinances that was AGAINST US THAT WAS CONTRARY UNTO US and took it out of the way â—ailing it to his Cross Now this was the manner of Christ's enervating the Law and leaving it without strength or obligation upon us to punishment as the expression is Rom 76. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Law is made of no strength against us so it might be rendred though the Translation is this we are delivered fram the Law the Law can hold us captives no longer it is made a weak and a vain thing to us having spent all it's rage fury upon Christ for the Law could do no more then it did upon Christ what can the Law do more to a debtor nay to any malefactor then arrest him bring him to trial and execution and all this the Law did upon Christ as our surety and so left no strength or vigour in it self against those whose Surety he was The Law when it fell upon us it left us without strength Rom. 5.6 When we were yet without strength in due time Christ died for the ungodly but when Christ comes to deal with the Law he leaves the Law without strength nay though he offered no affront or violence to the Law yet he left it for dead as it is Rom. 7 6. Now we are delivered from the Law THAT BEING DEAD WHEREIN WE WERE HELD The Law that fell upon us when we were weak was taken by the Captain of our salvation and left for dead nay he made it suffer the same death that it put him to The Law nailed Christ to
the sins of the ages past I think there is this allusion in the words once in the end of the world for that the High-Priest offered but once in the year ver 7 of this chap. ours once in all and their once was in the end of the year nay about the same distance of time from the years end as our Saviour from the worlds end as is to be seen Lev. 16.29 it was in the seventh moneth seven bearing the same proportion to 12 or very near it that 4 doth to 7. taking it for granted that the world should last but about 7000 years therefore I would infer this allusion to be in the words that as theirs want c. Besides there is that in this Scripture which will enforce this Analogy of the end of the year to the fore-past year and the end of the world to the fore-past ages and it is this That if our Saviour through the excellency of his person and offering had not had this high honor from God that his once offering should serve instead of offering a hundred times over which the Priests under the law were fain to do and yet could never hereby purge away sin as to the Conscience I say if this once offering of our Saviour had not bin so highly acceptable to God as it was he must as the High-Priests did offer often have suffered often since the foundation of the world if he would have obtained pardon of sins for those for whom he obtained it he must have come into the World and suffered once a year or once in an age or else at the end of some certain term of years prefixed to him by his Father This is the argumentation of the holy Pen-man of the Epistle to the Heb. ch 9 25. * Dr Hammond in his Par. upon these words For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world hath it thus For then he should from time to time ever since the BEGINNING the world have dyed many times Now upon what ground doth this argumentation proceed other then this That when he suffered and offered himself it was as a propitiation to God for the sins of all the ages since the Foundation of the World For else whence would it follow at all though our Saviour should have been ranked by his Father amongst the common High-Priests his offering of himself no more accepted for pardon than their offering the blood of Buls Goats was I say whence would it follow that he must have offered himself often since the foundation of the World which certainly respects the ages past if he was not at all to make attonement for the sins of those past ages The Author of that Epistle would rather have said if he had not gone upon this supposition that Christ offered for the sins of the ages past before his suffering but had onely thought that he offered for the ages to come after his suffering I say he would rather have expressed himself thus If out High-Priest Jesus Christ had not been accepted for us under the Gospel more highly than the legal High-Priests were for their people under the law he must often offer as they did SINCE his first offering he must come and suffer death once in the year and then be raised to offer himself to God or at least once in an age or some set-period of time and this he must do to the end of the World he would never have expressed himself thus then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world But whereas now the Apostle looâ—ing upon the world as it were at an end or drawing towards its end for suppose the World last 70 oâ— years yet after 4000. years the Skale of Time is turned and Time in its declining he speaks of the world and the continuance of it as you would do of a year and the continuance of it faith he as the High Priest amongst the Jews did enter into the Holy of Holies once in the end of the year for to make an atonement for the sins of the year past so hath our Saviour once in the end of the world appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself Again for I have somewhat yet further which this phrase now once in the end of the world will afford us and that is this That indeed though it be true and I think I have sufficiently proved it above that this death offering of Christ frees US from sin that live after it as well as THOSE that went afore it yet I verily believe that his death hath a more obvious respect to them that lived in the ages before he suffered than to us who came into the world after he suffered though it hath indeed an influence upon us too and the reason is this for that the use of a Sacrifice is to make atonement for sin after it is committed When did you ever read of a Sacrifice for sins slain and offered before the sin was committed The Sacrifices that should be made thus would rather look like a bribing the Deity to get liberty to sin then to make atonement for sin Therefore all the particular Sacrifices that were appointed they were appointed to be used after the legal uncleanness was contracted and accordingly the High Priest that went but once into the Holy of Holyes it was at the end of the year not at the beginning of the year And thus our Saviour being to take away the sins of the world John 1.29 he came once in the end of the world to take away sin so that his appearing thus in the end of the world seems more plainly to respect the ages past than the ages which were to come and I verily believe if Christ had dyed only for the sins of those ages that have been since his death or shall be yet to the end of the world he would have forborn his death till the end of the world or the times that were near it from this very reason of decency That it is not proper to offer Sacrifice for sin till the sin be committed it rather looks like the dispensation to sin than making atonement for sin But now that Christ was to dye for the sins of all the Saints in all ages before him and that he stayed till the fulness of time even till the declining of time towards its end there being so many transgressions already committed that were to be removed out of the way it was no uncomely thing at all that our Saviour should come and die and offer himself to God when he did though the value of the same Sacrifice was to reach all ages after to the world's end and that especially for that there were many other ends of his coming besides the offering himself thus to God he was to take upon him the Mediatorial Kingdome Several other ends of Christs coming besides offering himself a Sacrifice for sin to set up a