his treasures can keepe them Concerning the merites of CHRIST they say that there was such precious vertue in his blood that one droppe of it was sufficient to redeeme all the world now say they what shall become of all the rest of his blood which he shâ—…d in great abundance shall all this precious blood be lost and where can it be better kept than in the treasures of CHRISTS Vicar to be dispensated to the vtilitie of sinners when need requireth To this vaine assertion of Papistes I answere that the LORD nâ—…uer dealt sparingly neither with our bodies nor soules The LORD hath prouided greater abundance of aire for the refreshment of our bodies than all the breathing senses of men and beasts is able to draw in The LORD rained downe MANNA from heauen in greater plentie than might haue sufficed the people of the Ieweâ—… in the wildernesse euen so when the LORD is content to shed grâ—…at abundance of his precious blood he hath done it to set foorth the great riches of his mercie toward our soules but not to make a mortall man a dispensator of one drop of his blessed blood The chiefe questions betwixt vs the Romane Church anent Originall sinne are two First whether or no concupiscence which remaineth in the godly after their baptisme be in a proper acception called sinne or not for the Romane Church saith that it is called sinne by the Apostle because it came of sinne and it tendeth to sinne but not because it is sinne is a proper acception And the Council of Trent pronounceth an anathema against them who thinke otherwise than they haue determined The second controuersie is whether or no the naturall concupiscence mouing vs to euill can be called a sinne before wee giue the consent of our mind to it The Romane Church thinketh it no sinne vntill we yeeld the consent of our hearts vnto it The third question anent sinnes coÌ„mitted before after baptisme what way they are remitted because this question pertaineth more properly to another treatise I shal oueâ—…passe it at this time Now anent the first question I affirme that the Apostle Paul when he calleth concupiscence sin hee calleth it sin in a proper acception of the word sin Many names are giuen to sin in Scripture which expresseth what it is properly but especially these 3. names 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Concupiscence is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a transgression of the Law as the Apostle manifestlly witnesseth when he sayeth I had not knowne lust except the Law had saide Thou shalt not lust therefore concupiscence is sinne in a proper acception In like manner concupiscence or originall sinne is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is an aberration to wit from the Lawe and Commandement of GOD and in exprâ—…sse wordes the Apostle speaking of Originall sinne sayeth Wherefore as by one man sinne entered into the worlde and death by sinne and so death went ouer all men forasmuch as all men haue sinned c. In this place concupiscence is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is an aberration from the Commandement of GOD and consequently a sinne in a proper acception of the worde sinne Remember also that the Apostle is speaking of all men yea and of himselfe also in the estate whereinto hee was presently when he wrote this epistle that is after he was baptized Then let vs marke the third word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth a snappering and a falling to wit from the Lawe and Commandement of GOD and this word also is attributed vnto Originall sinne in these wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is through the offence of one man many bee dead so that all these three wordes concurring in one doe declare that concupiscence euen after baptisme in a proper sense is sin because it is a breaking of the Lawe an aberration from the Lawe and a falling from the Lawe Nowe the curses of the Councill of Trent which they cast out so prodigally against vs are not worthie one figge because they are not grounded in reason but are expresly repugnant to the written worde of GOD. The second question is this whether or no is concupiscence a sinne before we yeeld the consent of our heart vnto it To this I answere that if they vnderstood by concupiscence a bad inclination it is sinne euen in infants who doe not knowe what it is to consent either to good or euill but if they meane of the first motion or cogitation of sinne presented vnto the soule apparently this question belongeth rather to actuall than to originall sinne but whether it belongeth to the root of sinne or to the branches of sinne I shall produce three reasons wherfore the first motion of sinne is sinne euen before we yeeld vnto it the consent of our heart First because a consent is an indifferent thing called good or euill according to the nature of that thing whereunto we giue our consent and consequently the consent is euill because that motion of sinne whereunto wee consented was euill and if it had not beene euill in it selfe the consent of our heart giuen vnto it had neuer beene called euill Secondly Fathers from whome Papistes haue learned this Theologie that in them who are regenerated concupiscence is not to bee counted a sinne vntill a man giue the consent of his heart vnto it these same Fathers I say after they had pierced deeper into this question they corrected themselues as clearely appeareth by the wordes of Augustine against Iulâ—…anus a Pelagian saying Desiderium mali malum est etiamsi ci non consentiatur donec co perveniamus ubi nec habeatur that is the desire of euill is euill albeit consent be not giuen vnto it vntill wee attaine vnto that estate whereinto we shall be free of it Thirdly the Apostle IAMES when he damneth actuall sin he agreageth it by three circumstances to wit by the conception of it the birth of it and the punishment of it the conception of it is by concupiscence and this the Apostle setteth downe as the first circumstance of the amplification of sinne and not as a thing indifferent vntill wee giue consent vnto it how beit it is true that actuall sinne is not committed vntill consent be giuen to concupiscence yet in it selfe it is a sinne and the conception and root of sinne as the Apostle speaketh It is no point of wisdome to extenuate or to obscure and hide our sinnes for GOD can set them all in order before our face as the psalmist speaketh and if this bee all the gaine and aduantage wee haue by denying and obscuring a part of our sinnes it were better to lay all open before the great Phisitian of our soules to the end that in due time we may be cured by his medicinall plasters Augustine maketh rehearsall of three medicinall cures against concupiscence in these wordes In corpore mortis
a sufficient number of odious names Hee is called the Antichrist an aduersarie to God the man of sinne the childe of perdition and in other places the false prophet the beast that is worshipped great Babylon the mother of whoredomes which stile albeit they transfeâ—…re it vnto the Romane chaire when the tenne persecuâ—…ing Emperours compelled men to worship heathen gods yet the holy Scripture referreth it to that whore who braggeth that she is married to wit to Christ and shee is not a widowe Apocal. cap. 18. verse 7. And this agreeth better with the chaire of Rome wherein Popes doe sit than with the chaire of Rome when persecuting Emperours sate into it Besides all these odious names the Apostle addeth another hatefull name calleth him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is that lawlesse man who will bee subject to no lawe neither diuine nor humane but hee will bee aboue all lawes hee will judge all men and bee judged of no man what regarde hee hath of the lawe of GOD it maye bee knowne by this That the breaking of the Popes lawe is counted a greater sinne than the breaking of the Lawe of GOD for in matters of marriage and meates if the Popes lawe bee transgressed foorth-with a man is counted an Heretique But when the Lawe of GOD is broken for a small summe of money a pardon may be purchased Yea further I am bolde to saye that the moste discrepant Idiomes of the GREEKE language such as the ATTICKE and IONICKE Idiomes they differ not so farre as the lawes of CHRIST and ANTICHRIST differ one from another Albeit the Atticke Dialect delighteth in contractions and the Ionicke in resolutions yet notwithstanding one and the selfe same thing in substance and matter maye bee vttered in both these discrepant Idiomes But the Lawes of CHRIST and Antichrist are so opposite in matter and substance that they cannot both consist and stand namelie when the Lawe of CHRIST biddeth alloweth and approoueth and the lawe of the Antichrist in that same subject forbiddeth disalloweth and disapprooueth The Lawe of GOD Exod. 20. counteth worshippers of Images haters of GOD The lawe of the Antichrist counteth them good Catholiques The lawe of CHRIST in the doctrine of Faith Inuocation and Mediation sendeth vs onelie to the Creator The lawe of the Antichrist sendeth vs to the creatures also so that the Antichrist is justlie called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or a lawlesse man in respect hee will not bee obedient to the Lawes of CHRIST Concerning humane and ciuill ordinances Hee who dare assoyle subjectes from the oathe of alleadgeance to their soueraine lordes hee vndoeth all ciuill gouernement policie and lawes from the verie foundation I superceede to write further in this point In the second place let vs consider the time wherein the Antichrist shall bee reueiled pointed out in these wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is and then shall the wicked man bee reueiled which wordes beeing relatiue to that which immediatelie passed before importeth that the Antichrist shoulde bee reueiled at that same time when the mightie Monarchie of the Romanes was trodden vnder his feete Then it seemed that all the nations of the worlde should adore and worshippe the beast continuallie and that the tongues of men shoulde haue bene locked vp in silence so that no man euer shoulde take boldnesse to speake one word against the whore of Babylon yea and the Holy Apostle describeth the great securitie of the mother of whoredomes saying in his heart I sit being a Queene and am not a widow and shall see no mourning Apocal. 18. 7. At this same time the vnchangeable decreet of the Almightie God appointed that this wicked one should first be reueiled and afterward should be destroyed Wherin it is to be noted with what patient expectation wee shoulde attende vpon the times and seasons wherein it should please the Lord to performe his owne works for like as Christ thought it more expedient more teÌ„ding to the aduancement of His owne glorie to raise Lazarus out of his graue Ioan. 11. rather than out of the bedde of his infirmitie Euen so the Lord thought meet to suffer the Antichrist to mount vp vnto the top of all his desired prehemineÌ„ce then the Lord put hand to work both to discouer to destroy him to the further manifestation of his own vnspeakeable power wisdome In the third place the meanes are to be considered whereby the Antich should be discouered namely by the sincere preaching of the Gospel by the mouthes of men holy zealous Apoc. 11. 3 in gifts not vnlike vnto Henoch Helias Now seeing the man of sin is to be discouered by the sincere preaching of the Gospell let vs consider what benefite redoundeth to vs by the true and sincere preaching of the Gospell of CHRIST it is like vnto the light of the daye which manifesteth euerie thing in its owne coloures The thing that is beautifull is seene to bee bee beautifull and the thing that is euill fauoured is seene to be such as it is where of the madnesse of some Heretiques such as Gnostici and Mâ—…nichet is clearly perceiued who rejected the Scriptures of God because in them is contained a commemoration of the faultes of the Patriarches Shall the light be despised because it manifesteth both beautie and desormitie both strength and debilitie both the perfection of a complete body and the imperfection of a dismembered and mutilate bodie In like manner the Holy Scriptures are to bee had in the more reuerende regarde when they describe euery thing in their own colours and manifesteth on the one part the riches of the mercie of God in Iesus Christ and on the other part the falsehood subtiltie hypocrisie and pride of the Antichrist to the end that Gods people maye eschewe the Antichrist and rejoyce in the sweete saluation of Christ Iesus This discouerie of the Antichrist in some weake measure began about the yeere of our Lord 1300. at what time learned men fearing the tyrannie of the Emperour of the Turks fled to Italie and restored the Grieke and Latine languages to their own puritie This vindicating of languages from the grosse barbaritie of those times opened a doore of knowledge and a desire of reading with a judicious consideration of that which was read whether or not it were a suppositious worke More-ouer God annointed the eyes of many learned men with the eye-salue of vnderstanding whose sight increasing by degrees in end manifested to the worlde that the chaire of Rome was the seate of the Antichrist Marsilius Patavinus in his booke called Defensor Pacis writeth that the Clergie of Rome is a denne of thiâ—…ues and that the doctrine of the Pope is not to bee followed because it leadeth vnto eternall death Franciscus Petrarcha a man famously learned calleth Rome the whore of Babylon the Schoole and mother of errour the temple of Heresie the nest of treacherie growing and increasing by the oppression of others
as obeye the injunctions of the Priest What haue we to doe with such foolish and babbling speaches which are not grounded in Scripture For the Apostles who preached repentance and remission of sinnes after Christes ascention to heauen they ledde the people expressely to the promises made to the Patriarches and Prophets concerning the comming of Christ and of remission of sinnes in him heereby acknowledging no difference in substance betwixt repentance vnder the olde Testament and vnder the new Testamēt because both they and wee are ledde to one fountaine of the house of Dauid there to be washen and to be cleansed from all spotte of sinne Truely the doctrine of repentance taught in holy Scripture declareth that it is a worke wrought in vs by the Lord himself according as Christ our Lord witnesseth saying No man commeth vnto mee except my Father who sent me draw him The meanes whereby this worke is wrought in vs is by the fearefull trumpet of the law and by the sweet promises of the Gospell The instrumentes which GOD vseth in this worke are the Prophets Apostles their successors None of these things can be denied for the Apostle saieth God was in Christ and reconciled the Worlde vnto himselfe not imputing their sinnes vnto them and hath committed vnto vs the worde of reconciliation no we then are wee Ambassadours for Christ as though God did beseech you through vs we pray you in Christs sleade to beereconciled vnto God In these fore-mentioned places of Scripture three thinges are set downe First God is counted the efficient worker of repentance Secondly the promises of the Gospell whereunto the terroures of the lawe prepare an open doore are the meanes alluring vs to repentance Thirdly the Ministers of the Worde are the instrumentes to carrie the message of reconciliation vnto vs. The very law it selfe and the Gospell cannot haue the honour due to God who is the efficient worker of repentance because both law and Gospell was preached to reprobate Iewes but they were not conuerted by repentance to the trueth of God in regarde the Lord who is the efficient worker of repentance wrought not inwardly in their hearts As concerning the Preachers of the doctrine of reconciliation they receiue their honour from their Ambassadrie and they giue no honour vnto it except by accident in respect of the people who carry the greater reuerēce to an holy message when they see the Ambassadour who carrietith to bee an holy man But now let vs consider God in the worke of repentance as the head the message of reconciliation as the stomacke the preachers of the word who carrieth this message as the feete whose feete albeit they bee called beautifull in regarde of the sweete message which they carry yet the feete must neither haue the honour of the head nor of the stomack But the Romane church by giuing this honour to a priest that hee conferreth exopere operato remission of sinnes to the person who confesseth in particular all his faults vnto him they giue the honour of the head to the feete Like as in all their Religion their principall drift seemeth to bee this to leade the people from the Creator who is blessed for euer to an excessiue confidence in the creatures of God The grounde of the Sacrament of Pennance is a conceite of satisfaction which men can make for their own sinnes committed after Baptisme as if the promise of remission of sinnes made in Baptisme did extende onely to sinnes preceeding Baptisme What is this else but directly to contradict the words of Christ spoken to his Apostles Hee who beleeueth and is baptized shall bee saued Can any man be saued by an absolution from a part of his sinnes and not from all his sinnes This doctrine of the Romane Church bringeth in Christ as a Sauiour and not a Sauiour deliuering vs from the debt of by-past sinnes and setting vs once without the prison doore but knowing assuredly that wee shall be thrust into the prison againe there to remaine vntill wee satisfie for our own sins cōmitted after Baptisme And they make vs to be our owne sauiours rather than Christ for he who deliuereth a man from his last and greatest trouble is rather to bee counted his deliuerer than he who deliuered him from his first trouble The particular thinges required in the Sacrament of Pennance they say are foure to wit Contrition in the heart Confession in the mouth Satisfaction in the deede and Absolution of the Priest If these things were rightly conceiued in repentance all these thinges are necessarily required But as they are in the Romane Church all are meere abominations and displeasing vnto God First concerning the Contrition of the heart the Psalmist speaketh The sacrifices of God are a contrit◅ spirit a contrite and a broken heart O God thou wilt not despise But in the Romane Church when a Poenitentiare commeth to his father Confessor and discouereth a sinne not such as he hath already committed and for the which he is pearced with sore displeasure as Dauid was but rather hee discouereth to his father Confessor a treasonable attempt which he is minded to practise with obstinate purpose of an incorrigible heart shall such a man bee counted to haue a contrite and a broken heart Yet in our dayes no man is more welcome to a father Confessor than such a man as discouereth to him horrible treasons plotted against Noble Princes Yea and no confessions are more secretly buried in the mindes of father Confessors than those confessions are Is this a contrite spirite and a broken heart wherein the Lord delighteth Or can there bee a greater abuse of the doctrine of Contrition than to count them contrite in heart who are bent obstinately to runne forward in the course of vngodlinesse Popish Contrition is not vnlike vnto the fighting of Marcus Crassus both father and sonne against the Parthians Crassus the elder in his Oration made to encourage his army to fight valiantly his voyce failed him Marcus Crassus his sonne in his first out-going out of the house he stumbled Both these things were counted euill presages of the vnprosperous successe of the battell which after followed And what esperance can wee haue of this new found out Sacrament of Popish Pennance when as they judge so boldly of the first point thereof that is of Contrition counting traitors to bee men of a contrite spirit whome God hath appointed for the flames of euerlasting burning except they repent The forme of Confession vsed in the Romane Church hath neither warrand nor example in the Scripture of God that anie person should bee bound in particulare to confesse all his secret sinnes to the Priest The place of Scripture vildly abused Acknowledge your faultes one to another and praye one for another that yee may be healed c. it should bee expounded by another place of Scripture wherein a man who hath offended his neighbour is
owne infirmitie but onely for our sake who are sheepe of the sheepfold of Christe to guide vs by it to correct our wandering wayes and to holde vs in decent order Therefore of all things in the worlde let vs count Scripture a thing most pertinent to vs according to the saying of MOSES the secret thinges belong vnto the Lorde our God but the things reueiled belong to vs and our children for euer that wee may doe all the wordes of this Lawe Deut. 29. ver 29. to wit the Lawe written as is clearely declared Deut. 27. ver 2 and 3. When thou shalt passe ouer Iorden into the lande which the Lord thy God giueth thee thou shtli set up great stones and plaster them with plaster and Shelt witte upon them all the wordes of this Lawe c. Now if the writteÌ„ word be that very portion that belonged properly to our fathers to vs to our children we should sticke as fast to it as euer NABOTH did to his vineyarde remeÌ„bring euer these words of MOSES Things that are reuei led to wit in writ pertaine to vs to our children for euer According to the patterne of this written word were al reformations of religion made not according to the vncertaine report of traditions IOSIAS made reformation according to the booke of the couenant that was founde in the house of the Lord 2. Reg. cap. 23. ver 2. And therefore this worde of God ought diligently to be kept as the very patterne of all true reformation in religion if any abuse fall out at any time In our natiue countrie men are not so careful by diligent custodie to keep other measures as the measure whereby all other measures in the lande are measured one towne hath the weightes another hath the jug the third hath the furlot another hath the el-wand these are diligently kept because that bythem all faulty measures are corrected and reformed so aboue all things in this worlde the holy Scriptures should be most diligently kept Now before I speake of humane traditions the very end wherefore the Apostles committed to write the summe of their wholesome doctrine is a sore prejudice to tradition For some persons who hearde the Apostles preach went from Ierusalem to Antiochia and troubled the hearts of the Gentiles saying that they behooued to be circumcised and keepe the Law of MOSES to whome the Apostles gaue no such commandement Actes 15. Therefore the Apostles tooke occasion to put in write the summe of their doctrine Nowe if tradition was not a faithfull keeper of the Apostolicke doctrine in the very dayes of the Apostles and in the mouthes of them who heard the Apostles preach with their owne eares howe shall wee leane vnto the vncertaintie of traditions after the issue of sixteene hundreth yeeres The generalitie of the worde tradition is an occasion of errour to many for so soone as this word soundeth in their eares incontinent they thinke that all things necessarie vnto eternall life is not contained in Scripture but the want of Scripture must be supplied by traditions yet the Apostle calleth the very articles of our faith traditions namely that Christ died for our sinnes that he was buried and that he rose the third day againe 1. Cor. 15 ver 3. The Papistes take good heede to the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and say here mention is made of tradition but they obserue not so diligently the subsequent wordes albeit they be twise repeated by the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is according to Scriptures If they will needs obtrude vnto vs traditions at the least let them be agreable vnto Scriptures and then the controuersie will cease For I may boldly speake of Popish traditions that which CLEMENS speaketh of the Philosophie of the Grecians comparing it vnto a nut 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is all the nut is not meet to be caten the kirnell is for eating but the hard shels whereinto the kirnell is enclosed are not nourishing food euen so saith CLEMENS not all the Grecian Philosophie is to bee embraced and credited The like I say of Romaine traditions that we must not glut ouer their traditions shels and kirnell altogether but those that are agreable to Scriptures we receiue but traditions repugnant to Scripture such as worshipping of images which DAMASCENE granteth to be an vnwritten tradition we vtterly detest and abhorre The place of PAVLS Epistles that seemeth to fauour vnwritten tradition is this Therefore brethren stand sast keep the instruction which yee haue beene taught either by worde or by our epistle 2. Thess 2 ver 15. Heere I affirme that like as they who rehearsed Christs wordes and wrested the true sense and meaning of them they are called false witnesses against Christ Math. 26. ver 61. Christ spake these words indeede Destroy this Temple and within three dayes I wâ—…ll build it vp againe but not in that sense that the false witnesses reported Euen so they who cite a testimonie out of the Epistles of PAVL in another sense then PAVL writeth it they are false witnesses against PAVL for PAVLS tongue in preaching was guided by the holy Ghost and PAVLS hand and pen in writting was guided by the holyGhost that same selfe trueth he preached that same selfe trueth he committed to write to the ende that the faith of the Thessalonians might be the better confirmed and strengthened If they will obstinatly contend that the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is disjunctiue I will constantly affirme with the most learned ANTONIVS SADEEL that in this place it is copulatiue in this sense Keepe that instruction which yee haue receiued both by word and epistle And in the same sense 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken 1. Cor. 13. ver 8. Whether prophecying shall be abolished or tongues shall cease that is both prophecying shall be abolished and tongues shall cease Stand fast and keepe the instruction 2. Thess. 2. ver 15 It is not the purpose of the Apostle in these wordes to exhort any man to wilfulnes and obstinacie but vnto constant adherence vnto the veritie of God For the Apostle PETER describing the qualities of false teachers calleth them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is men presumptuous standingon their own conceits 2. Pet. 2. ver 10. Wherfore a difference is to be noted betwene obstinat men constaÌ„t men It is obstinacie when a man walketh in his own wayes will not be corrected by the wisdome of God but it is constancie when a man walketh in the wayes of God and will not depart out of them for the fauour or feare of men CAIN was obstinat Gen 4. PETER and IOHN were constant Also to keepe fast the doctrine whereby they were taught both by word and Epistle is not onely to keepe it in memorie and to keepe the volume wherein scriptures are written but to keepe it indeede by the obedience of faith For men are thrise
sinne to eate flesh that wine was the gall of the Prince of darkenesse that mariage was an euill thing and a meane to bring in captiuitie a parte of the substance of the good God namely the soule within the bands of the substance of the prince of darkenesse that is within the body hath the Spirit of God I say foretolde nothing of these vile heresies in this prediction I answere That the Spirit hath both foretolde the hypocrisie of some and the open blasphemie of others And this is insinuated in these wordes For eue◅y creature of God is good and nothing to be refused if it be receiued with tha◅kesgiuing Truely in these words the Apostle would turne our harts both from blaspheming Manicheis and from hypocrite Papists The Manicheis say that it is neuer lawfull to eate flesh and that the doing of it aduanceth the kingdome of the prince of darknesse The Papists againe say that the eating of flesh on Eryday is a grieuous sinne but what saith the Apostle guided by the Spirit Euery creature is good and nothing to be refused so that both the Manicheis speake blasphemously and the Papistes hypocritically both willing to abridge Christian libertie the Manicheis by their opinion the Papistes both by their opinion and authoritie The Manicheis will needes haue some creatures of God vncleane at all times the Papists wil needes haue men polluted by eating of flesh at sometimes both these opinions are cut off in this word Euery creature of God is good Marke that in this diuersitie of opinions of Manicheis and Papists both of them shoot at one marke to wit that Christ Iesus shall not be the onely Lawgiuer in his Church but something shall be abridged of that libertie that Christ hath giuen to his Church Now the aiming and shooting at one marke is more forcible to proue the vnitie of Manicheis and Papistes then the diuersitie of opinions whereby either of them laboureth to attaine to their intended purpose can proue their diuersitie and therefore let the reader the lesse offend with this fellowship of Manicheis and Papists These two diuerse opinions shooting at one marke as said is are both to bee damned but chiefly that opinion that with greatest subtiltie and craft would thrust God out of his chaire and spoile him of his glory not to bee counted the only Lawgiuer in his Church And I do confidently compare Manicheis and Papistes as AVGVSTINE compare◅h APOLLO and HECATE lib. 19. de civit Det cap. 23. disapproouing both of them because both shot at one marke to hinder people from Christianitie but HECATE more then APOLLO because in praising of Christ as a just man whom APOLLO dispraised as an vnrighteous man justly cōdemned to death by the Iewes yet she called him onely a man not God hindering people after a more subtle maner from adhering to Christianitie then APOLLO did And truly the Manich is by damning flesh at all times as a creature in it selfe vncleane did not so great hurt to the Kingdome of God as the Papists who grant that both flesh and wine are the good creatures of God and yet they dare be bold to set out lawes commanding men vnder the paine of cursing and condemnation that they taste not flesh at some times If these times were times of a publicke calamitie whereinto God by a secret voyce latent in the trouble did cali vs to fasting mourning abstinence frō fish flesh wine Isa. 22. ver 13. then no new or vncouth yocke should be presented 10 mens consciences but Christs owne yocke which we are commanded to beare Mat. 11-but to appoint certaine daies of fasting and abstinence from this meate and not from anothe◅ meace is a noueltie vnder the Gospell and not the yocke of Christ but of the Antichrist Whereas mention is made of thankesgiuing the Apostle will not haue vs to set our hearts vpon the creature vpon the gift but vpon the Creator the giuer Whatsoeuer delite we haue in the creature there is infinitly greater delite in the face of the reconciled Creator and therefore lift vp our harts let our tongues be loosed to praise his blessed name from whose hands we haue receiued the vse of his creatures This if wee doe we haue both the gift the giuer and the presence of the giuer shall not onely sanctifie the gift to our vse but also shall turne our water into wine Iohn 2. when as by the contrarie if wee deuoure and glut vp the benefites of God without thanksgiuing we haue the gift without the fauour of the giuer eating of Gods creatures as the carnall I◅wes eated Quailes in the wildernesse Numb 11. ver 33. and the wrath of God was kindled against them and assuredly those who haue the gift without the giuer some day their wine shall be turned into water But there is not great controuersie in this point and therefore I passe it ouer in fewer words In end the Apostle leadeth vs vnto a sure ground that may quiet our consciences so that we shall not be troubled with the commandements of men for bidding vs to eat of meats which God hath created for our vse namely this thatGod hath sanctified his creatures to vs by his word Gen. 9. ver 3. And incase we joyne with this sanctification of them prayers proceeding from faith that we also may be sanctified receiueGods creatures with a good conscience there is not great peril whether we eat this or that meat moderatly Here marke that the Apost in the very matter of meat drinke corruptible food will haue vs to depend vponGods word to think that we haue not liberty to put one morsel of meat in our mouthes but so farre as God giueth vs allowance in his word how much more in matters pertaining vnto eternall life we are to depend absolutely vpon the vndoubted assurance of Gods written worde In all this discourse it may seeme that we loose the raines to licentious liuing to eating drinking marying and liuing wantonly as the original worlde did when they were drouned with waters but it is not so indeed Only in maters of religion we would haue the yocke of the cōmandements of men taken off mens cōsciences to the end that the yock of Gods commandements only may ly vpon the conscience according as Christ speaketh Take vp my yock vpon you Mat. 11. ver 29. Yea in the very mater of meats mariage there is a time wherinto God calleth vs to mourning lamentation baldnesse and sackcloth Isa. 22. ver 12. and to abstinence from eating of flesh and drinking of wine Yea the very bridegrome must come out of his chalmer fast and lay aside his costly apparell to the end hee may mourne with the humbled societie of Gods people loel 2. ver 16. And this commeth to passe whensoeuer the heauie hande of God is laide vpon a familie vpon a towne or vpon a countrie in the
it that is vile and filthie as hee did vnto the Priests of the succession of AARON If any man wil obstinatly contend that the promise made to the Apostles and their successours was absolute and not conditionall consider the inconuenients that will follow Seeing this promise was not made to PETER onely but also to all the rest of the Apostles and their successours then as none of the Romaine Bishops can erre in religion because they are the successours of PETER as they alledge so in like maner the Bishops of Ierusalem Alexandria Antiochia Ephesus Philippi Thessalonica Corinth diuerse other places are all exeemed from errour because the Apostles and Euangelists preached and constitute Churches in all-these places they are successours to the Apostles in that same sense that the Bishops of Rome are successours to PETER And if none of all these can erre what priuiledge hath the church of Rome aboue all other Churches Or how can that be performed which was foretolde by the Apostle concerning apostasie that should fall out the reuelation of the man of sinne childe of perdition 2. Thess. 2 For all the successours of the Apostles beeing exeemed from error what place could be giuen to the Antichrist or what doore could haue bene opened to MAHOMET by whose delusions the Orientall Church hath bene so miserably abused But seeing the Apostles had some extraordinarie things such as calling gifts and prerogatiues They were called immediatly by Christ and were taught immediatly by his Spirit and mouth Gal. 1. They receiued from heauen the gift of tongues and languages to vtter this celestiall knowledge to all tongues nations Act. 2. They had power by imposition of hands to conferre to others the gift of the holy Spirit Act 8 With these extraordinarie giftes they had also extraordinarie prerogatiues that in teaching the doctrine receiued from Christ they should not erre Now these who cal themselues successors to the Apostles they dare not clame to the Apostles immediat calling nor yet to their extraordinarie gifts but that which of all the rest was most extraordinarie to the Apostles viz. to be exeemed from errour in teaching and writing that is so fast adhered vnto that it is one of the principal grounds of the Romaine faith in our dayes that the Bishop of Rome cannot erre in faith and religion Yea so infortunate are the Bishoppes of Rome of late dayes that they would climme vp to the highest top and preeminence of Apostolicke dignitie to be exeemed from errour when as in things of lesse importance they cannot attaine as we speak to the Apostles garters This proud conceit of Apostolick succession with power of binding and loosing exemption from errour made some of the Bishops of Rome so high minded so vaine and ridiculous that learned fathers conueened together in Councils thought their pride more worthie to be receiued with scoffing wordes then with prolixe refutations Example whereof wee haue in a Councill gathered at Rome in the time of the Emperour OTTO the first about the yeere of our Lord 956. In which Councill IOHN 13. Others write Pope IOHN the 12. hee fled for feare of the Emperour OTTO Many grieuous accusations were giuen in against him such as incest murther saeriledge playing at dice and drinking to the deuill admitting of boyes to be Bishops for money with many other villanous things ouâ—…r and beside his perfidie in assisting BERENGARIVS and his sonne ALBERTVS against the Emperour OTTO contrarie to his promise and oath made before to the Emperour Libertie being granted to Pope IOHN to compeare without feare to answere to the accusations objected against him he beeing conuict in conscience would not compeare but he sent a short letter to the Council bearing that he was PETERS successor and had power of binding loosing by vertue of this power hee band them vnder paine of cursing that they should not proceede to his deposition To this proud letter the Councill gathered at Rome returned this answere that Christ gaue power of binding loosing to all his disciples as well as to PETER but one of them to wit IVDAS by abusing his power lost his power only he retained some power of binding to wit he had libertie to binde his owne necke to the gallous In which wordes they call him IVDAS and biddes this vile beast goe and hang himselfe if he lift Hist. Magdeb urg Cent. 10. cap. 9. PLATINA callâ—…th IOHN 13. homo sceleratissinus a most wicked man ONVPHRIVS the aduocate of all wicked causes blusheth and dare not stand at the barre to pleade the cause of IOHN 12. the predecessour of LEO the eight for both are one man he whom PLATINA calleth 13. and he whome ONVPHRIVS counteth 12. The Bishops of Rome might haue bene admonished by this one example if there were no mo not to be high minded not to cum to the supreame top of Apostolicke preeminence In a worde the Bishops of Rome of late yeeres are moâ—…e like to the successours of CAIAPHAS who would needes haue Christe to stand before his judgement seat judge of Christ his doctrine disciples Ioh. 18 ver 19. then they are like to the successours of PETER for I can see no inexcusable boldnes in CAIAPHAS damning Christs doctrine but I grope the like in the Romaine church that vsurpeth authoritie ouer the written word ouer Councils and consequently ouer Christ himselfe To conclude this treatise I will compare succession wherof the Romaine church braggeth so much to the way that lay betweene Samaria and Jerusalem this way led the people of Ephraim Manasse Jssachar Zabulon Nephthali and Aser to Jerusalem when they set their face Southward when they went vpward but the same way againe led them from Jerusalem when they turned their faces Northward when they went downward Euen so if a man set his face toward heauenly Ierusalem he shal finde a number of holy successors of the Apostles in puritie of doctrine honestie of conuersation patience in suffering that shall leade him to Christ to heauenly Ierusalem but againe it is as certaine if a man will set his face Northward to defection to backsliding and to preferre the traditions of men to the ordinances of God there shall not inlacke a number of guiders in the roll of personall successours as they call it to the Apostles who shall lead him from Jerusalem to Samaria from the mountaine of God to the valley of Benhinnon Therefore while we are in the way take heed what way our faces are set whether to Ierusalem or to Samaria and if they be set to Ierusalem let vs followe these sure guides who were true successours to the Apostles and they shall indeede leade vs to Christ to heauenly Ierusalem and to the glory which in heart and minde we waite for whereunto God lead vs for his Christs sake Amen CENTVRIE III. Chap. 1. Seuerus AFter PERTINAX and IVLIAN SEVERVS gouerned 17 yeeres 8. months
vncleane because they were procreated by mariage Origeniani Turpes These were vile and filthie beastes not abhorring from whoredome but from procreation of children to the end they might seeme to be chaste They were like to ONAN the sonne of IVDAH whome the Lord destroyed Gen. 38. ver 9. 10. All these heresies mentioned by Epiphan contra haereses lib. 2. I passe by almost with silence because they were like vnto abortiue birthes and continued not long to perturbe the peace of the Church Now concerning other Heretiques by whose venemous doctrine the Church of Christ had greater strife and perturbation ARTEMON and BERYLLVS B. of Bostra in Arabia denied the diuinitie of Christ and affirmed that he was not existent before hee tooke flesh of the Virgine With BERYLLVS ORIGEN conferred reduced him backe againe to the true faith and therefore I set not his name in the Catalogue of Heretiques because he added not vnto the fault of his bad opinion an obstinate defending of the same Euseb eccl hist lib. 6 cap. 33. The heresie of Helcesaitae otherwise called Sampsei because of the shorte continuance of it is scarce worthy to bee reckoned as I haue declared in the treatise of heresie They mixed the religion of the Iewes Gentiles and Christians together but were more addicted to the superstition of the Iewes then to any one of the other two Epiphan contra haereses lib. 2. They rejected the writings of the Apostle PAVL and affirmed that a man who denied the Lorde with his mouth in the time of persecution if so be he adhered to the faith in his hart he had committed no sinne They caried about with them a singulare book which they said was sent downe from heauen and they promised remission of sinnes to euery man who would hearken to the wordes of that booke Comment Func in Chronol NOVATVS a Presbyter at Rome was a man of a contentious spirit and men that are humorous high minded and contentious they are wise to doe euill but they can do no good Such a man was NOVATVS who disquieted with schisme and heresie two of the most notable Churches in the world at that time viz Carthage and Rome by giuing out a rigorous sentence against those who in time of persecution had fallen albeit they had repented after their fall and all outward tokens of vnfained repentance had beene seene in them yet his opinion was that they should not be admitted againe to the fellowship of the Church This opinion was not onely repugnant to the wordes of ISA 1. Ezech. 18. Mat. 11. to innumerable moe places of sacred scripture but also it was a foolish opinion aduancing the kingdome of the deuill and not the kingdome of God For the two great wheeles of the cart of the deuill whereby hee carieth men headlong to hell are presumption and desperation mercilesse NOVATVS taching a doctrine that strengthened not the knees of the weake he did what in him lay to moue sinners to despare Therefore CYPRIAN B. of Carthage who excommunicated him and CORNELIVS B. of Rome who did the like with aduise of a graue and worthy Councill gathered at Rome Euseb. lib. 6. cap. 43. are to be counted wise men because they endeuoured timonsly to suppresse those errors that weakened the harts of the children of God I reade of no heresie preceeding the heresie of ARRIVS and EVTYCHES that continued longer time in the Church of God then the heresie of NOVATVS partly because it crept in vnder pretence of zeale to the glory of God and vnder pretence of a detestation of sin partly also because the Novatian Heretiques in the question concerning the diuinitie of Christ were comformable to the opinion of the true Church Sozom. lib. 7. cap. 12. Thirdly because in time of the Arrian persecution the Novatians were banished and troubled with no Iesse hatefull malice and despite then the members of the true Church were yea and the true Catholickes and Novatianes beeing companions of one and the selfe-same suffering were content also to giue their liues one for another Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 38. And the foresaide authour saith Parúmque abfuit quin coadunarentur Socrat ibid. that is They were neere by vnited and agreed together to wit the true Catholickes and Novatians But what was the impediment that hindered their vnion Reade the historie and it shall not bee found in the true Catholickes but in the obstinacie and wilfulnesse of the Novatians And so it falleth out at all times that men who are authours of heresies and schismes are also the principall hinderers of the redintegration of the vnitie of the Church The razing and demolishing of the Temple of the Novatians in Cyzicum a famous towne of Bithynia together with the calamitie of the people of Mantinium a towne of Paphlagonia Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 38 clearely proueth that the Novatian heresie continued vntill the dayes of CONSTANTIVS the sonne of CONSTANTINE an Arrian Emperour and persecuter of the true faith The fauour that they obtained in the dayes of IVLIAN I passe ouer with silence But in the dayes of the reigne of THEODOSIVS the Novatians by the Emperours edict were permitted to haue publicke conuentions in Constantinople to enjoy such priuiledges as other Christians had to possesse the oratories and temples whereinto they were accustomed to serue God All this toleration and libertie was granted to them by the good Emperour THEODOSIVS because in the heade of doctrine anent the diuinitie of Christ they damned the Acrians agreed with the Homousians Socrat. lib. 5. cap. 10. The Magdeburg historie saith that this heresie continued in Constantinople vntill the time that it was conquessed by the Turkes Cent. 3. cap. 5. I haue written of this heresie at greater length to admonish all true Christians that it is not enough to adhere to some pointes of the true faith and to suffer persecution for righteousnesse at some times and to loue brotherly fellowshippe at some times so that we are content 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 life for our brethren all these things did the Novatians and were fauoured by the Emperour THEODOSIVS as said is yet were they both sehismatickes and Heretiques because they would be wiser then God and debarred them from the bosome of Christs compassions whom Christ inviteth to come vnto him saying Come vnto me all ye that are wearie and laden and I will ease you Mat. 11. ver 28 Let the example of the Novatians admonish men who studie to singularitie and to bring in newe customes or opinions into the Church of God to take heede that their opinions be not repugnant vnto the written word lest after they haue continued a long time in ende they be rejected as opinions foolish vaine hereticall and not agreeing with the scriptures of God His followers were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or puritans Euseb. lib. 6. cap. 43. Hist. Magd. cent 3. cap. 5. Let this name rest in the bosome of Heretiques And men
followed the opinion of ORIGEN without examining it in the balance of holy scripture Ambros. in Psal. 118. saith that all men must goe through the fire at the latter day euen IOHN himselfe the belooued disciple of Christ of whose death also some doubted yet no man can doubt of his passing through the fire Thus AMBROSE suffered this opinion of ORIGEN to sincke into his heart as though it had beene the vndoubted Oracle of God which no man should call in question HILARIVS maketh no exception of the blessed Virgine the mother of our Lord in Psa. 118 but she must also go through this fire at the latter day And this is a foolish thing to followe any man further then he doth follow Christ the warrant of the written word of God 1. Cor. 11. And therefore the first generall Councill Ann. 551. as wise behind the hand was compelled to examine the bookes of ORIGEN to excōmunicat himself albeit dead long afore to damne his books and vaine opinions specially anent his Purgatorie This Origenian errour before it was seriously impugned it was changed to the worse and grew neerer to the originall of PLATOES Phlegeton againe for ORIGEN AMBROSE and HILARIVS spake of a fire that should burne at the latter day which al men behooued to passe through before they could enter into the place of refreshment but PLATO in his dialogue Phedo spake of a flood of fire whereinto men behoued to bee tried and purged immediatly after their soules were separated from their bodies and what soules I pray you Not the soules of the best men which went to heauen nor the worst men for they went to hell but the soules of men that were not into a mid rancke neither very good nor very euill This opinion I say somewhat neerer to the opinion of PLATO then to the opinion of ORIGEN beganne to take place about the foure hundreth yeere of our Lord as the distinctions of AVGVSTINE clearely witnesse Valde bom valde mali non valde mali Augustin enchiridion ad Laurent Idem de octo Dulcitii quaest Thus wandering errours once taking place became like vnto a fretting canker euery day worse worse If any man think strange that so vile an error neither agreable to scripture neither yet to it self but changing the similitude of it as the Chameleon doth his collour it preuailed wonderfully and was so fastened into the peoples hearrts that scarcely can it be rooted out of their mindes in our dayes To this I answere that besides the authoritie of the fathers aboue specified who were entangled with errour euen they also who found out the opinion of Purgatorie fire to be erroneous and repugnant to scripture yet did they not fully and in all points impugne this false and lying doctrine but onely in a parte As namely AVGVSTINE refuteth that part of CLEMENS and ORIGENS opinion wherein they thought that the deuils and wicked men after suffering of long tormentes may possibly be forgiuen and finde mercy By one place of scripture he vtterly vndoeth that opinion Depart'vnto the cuerlasting fire prepared for Sathan and his angels Mat. 25. ver 4 And in the booke of the Reuelation And they shall bee tormented night and day for euer and euer Apoc. 20 August lib. 20. 21. de civit Dei Yet the other parte of the errour that tooke deepe root in his dayes AVGVSTINE knewe it better then he impugned it lest he should gain-say the receiued opinion among all the people who thought that the soules of many men after their death were tormented with fire for a while vntill a full satisfaction were made for the faultes that men committed in their life-time Against this opinion AVGVTINE speaketh but softly Non valde coarguo for sitan verum est that is I doe not greatly reprooue it possibly it is true August De civit De◅lib 21. cap. 26. This was also some strengthening of errour that it was not fully in all points clearely refuted by godly fathers whose comporting with the weakenesse of the people in a parte CHEMNIICIVS himselfe calleth prudence and wisdome but serious impugning of erroneous doctrine had beene more agreable to the will of God Alwayes AVGVSTINE in his doubtsome speach giueth no ground to Papists to make vp a newe article of faith anent Purgatorie For like as Constantinople was a great citie yet when it was shaken with an earthquake three dayes and three nights no man taried in that great towne to builde a new house during that time euen so AVGVSTINE is a great doctour yet when hee taketh him to forsitan or per◅aps this is not a sure ground to leane vpon This vnhappie conceit of Purgatorie fire had many handmaids waiting vpon her some going before and others following after her Before the conceit of Purgatorie goeth an opinion of our owne satisfactions For the faultes committed by vs after Baptisme if we do not perfitly satisfie for them before our death it resteth that in Purgatorie fire we should absolue the rest of our pennance that is vnfulsilled How much this first handmaide derogateth from the glory of Christ the Apostle witnesseth when he saith The blood of Christ purgeth vs from all sinne I. Ioh. I. making no exception ofsinnes after Baptisme committed The other handmaide preceeding the conceit of Purgatorie is praier for the dead albeit in all the old and new Testament there be not one example of praying for the deade or yet offering of sacrifice for the dead Pardon 's followed sometimes called indulgences in another sense then now they are these pardons I say are the handmaids following Purgatorie by which the B. of Rome as absolut commander of Purgatorie hath made vnto himselfe infinite gaine Before I proceede any further I exhort all true Christians as they detest Paganisme euen so to detest all Ethnick errours when they are creeping in into the sanctuarie of God The golden Eagle of the Romanes was more abominable when it was set vp in the Temple of Ierusalem by HEROD Ioseph de bello Iudaico lib. 1. cap. 21. then when it was set vp in the Capitoll of Rome And the image of CAIVS CALIGVLA sent to PETRONIVS his Deputie to be set vp in the Temple of Ierusalem made all the Iewes agast and they were more willing to die then to see their Temple so filthily abused with idolatrie Ioseph antiq lib. 18 cap. 11. It is more seemely then that the golden Eagle and image of CAIVS remaine at Rome where they were first fashioned then to bee brought to the Temple of Ierusalem And it is more seemly also that the opiniō of Purgatory remaine in the schoole of PLATO at Athens or in the schoole of CLEMENS at Alex andria rather then to send it abroade through all Christian Congregations to bee beleeued For Christians ought to be like to the forlorne sonne after he returned home againe to his father Luc. 15. Hee was so well fed and
conscience a great number of them entrea◅e this argument In like maner the factes and wordes of ancient Fathers are miserably abused When Papistes reade in the Epistles of Augustine that the Emperour went vnto the tombe of the Apostle Peter sometime a fisher and laide aside his Emperiall Diademe and humbly bowed his knees and prayed at the sepulchre of P◅ter they clap their handes and shout for joy as if their cause were wonne But such transparent visardes will blind no mans eyes except onely the eyes of simple ignorant people and the eyes of those who are wilfully blinded because the praying at the sepulchre of Peter will not proue that the Emperour prayed vnto Peter but onely to GOD. And this custome was the more tolerable because Christians for the space of three hundreth yeeres were accustomed to heare GODS worde preached to receiue the Sacramentes yea and to pray in such places whereinto Martyres had glorified GOD by patient suffering of death for CHRISTES sake In all these actions they worshipped GOD whose worde they hearde preached in that place whose blessed Sacraments they receiued also in that place and they bowed their knees and prayed to GOD and not to the Martyres in that place yea and when the persecution ceased and Temples were builded there was a reuerent commemoration of the names of the Martyres without any inuocation and praying vnto them as Augustine expresly declareth Nowe let this grounde bee deepely setled and rooted in our heartes that GOD is the onely Fountaine and giuer of all good giftes who also knoweth all our miseries and is Omnipotent and can support them at such time as his Majestie knoweth to be expedient For the vision of GOD as saith the Prophet hath the owne appointed time and at the last it shall speake and not lie though it tarie Waite for it shall surely come and shall not stay And so much the more let vs with patient expectation awaite vpon the support that commeth from the throne of the grace of GOD because the LORD neuer commeth to vs with an emptie hande and neuer visiteth vs out of season as earthlie Phisitions doe oft times but euen when hee findeth vs lying in our graues and rotting in the stinke of a tab◅rnacle forsaken by the ghost who was wont to dwell into it then can hee raise vs out of graues as hee did LAZARUS This grounde beeing deepely fixed in our heartes I proceede to the n◅xt heade to declare that no man can approach neere to GOD without a MEDIATOR and that CHRIST is the onely MEDIATOR both of our Redemption and also of our Intercession and none other except hee onelie As concerning the first assertion that wee haue neede of a MEDIATOR there is no man so voide of vnderstanding who will denie it Like as in the fabricke of the worlde fire and water are elementes of so discrepant qualities that the Lord would not set them contiguouslie together lest the one should haue comsumed the other Therefore the Lord in his vnspeakeable wisedome hath set an element of a mid nature betwixt them to wit the Aire In the vppermoste parte of it not abhorring from the qualities of the fire and in the lower region of it conforming to the qualities of the water Euen so there can bee no fellowship betweene the holy God and sinnefull man without a Mediator And it was well said by Iosua Yee cannot serue the Lord for hee is an holy God he will not pardon your iniquitie nor your sins Therefore necessitie driueth vs in the Treatise of Inuocation to speake of the Mediator I will not paine my selfe to proue the thing that is not denied Papistes themselues grant two thinges First that Christ is the onely Mediator of our redemption Secondly that Christ is the onely Mediator of intercession betwixt God and vs. But herewithall they affirme that the Saints are mediators betwixt Christ vs. Of that which is fully grāted that Christ is the only Mediator of our redemption I infer according to the grounds of holy Scripture that Christ is also the onely Mediator of intercession For these two are vnseparably lincked together and he who hath the one honour hath both In the Epist. to the H◅brues it is said that Christ is the onely Mediator of our redemption and hereof it is inferred that hee is the onely Mediator of our intercession the wordes of the Apostle are these speaking of Christ But this man because hee indure◅h for euer hath an euerlasting Priesthood In these wordes Christ is set downe as the onely Mediator of our redemption Now marke that which followeth as a necessary consequence vpon the fore-mentioned grounde Wherefore hee is able also perfectly to saue them that come to GOD by him seeing hee euer liueth to make intercession for them Heere Christ is pronounced to bee the onely Mediator of our intercession and this conclusion is gathered vpon this ground because hee hath saued vs by his euerlasting sacrifice which is as much as to say because hee is the Mediator of our redemption Againe holie Scripture will inuert this order and set intercession in the first place and vpon this ground that Christ is the only Mediator of our intercession will conclude that Christ is also the onlie Mediator of our redemption Marke the words of the holy Apostle My babes these thinges write I vnto you that yee sinne not and if any man sinne wee haue an Aduocate with the Father IESUS CHRIST the Iust and hee is the reconciliation for our sinnes and not for ours onely but also for the sinnes of the Whole Worlde In these wordes Christ is first called our Aduocate and hereof is inferred that hee is our propitiation which is all one as if hee had saide CHRIST is the onely Mediator of our redemption In the Law of Moses the high Priest was only but a type of the true Mediator of intercession yet while hee was presenting the blood of the sacrifice of propitiation into the most holy place all the people stood without and neither Priest nor people remained within the court where the Altar of brunt offering was vntill the high Priest came foorth out of the moste holy place Now seeing our Lord Iesus hath offered a sacrifice for our sins ◅nd hath caried the blood of the euer lasting Couenant vnto the moste holy place that is vnto Heauen and is actually performing the office of our great Aduocate and making intercession for vs let no man presume to step to the Alt◅r and to take vpon him to bee a Mediator of redemption or intercession our high Priest is doing that worke in his owne person tarie vntill hee come foorth out of the moste holy place and then there shall bee no more disputation anent Mediators of interc◅ssion Augustine vtterly excludeth Peter and Paul from this honour to bee counted Mediators of our intercession because like as they prayed for others euen so in like maner
are reckoned amongst orders of Monkes yet was their emploiment more in desending Christians from the injurie of Infidels then in reading praying or any other spirituail exercises What became of these Templarii after they were dispersed throughout EUROPE and whether they were justly or vnjustly cut off all at one time by the ordinance of Clemens the fift in the Councill of Vienne I omit to speake but whether they had beene guiltie or innocent it was but small clemencie in Pope Clem. to giue out a sentence of death against so many before they were warned heard and sufficiently conuicted of faults laide vnto their charge The Orders of Carmelâ—…es who dwelt vpon Mount Carmell where Helias prayed and of Camaldinenses Ioannites the Order of white Monkes of the holy Trinitie of S. Clara of Penitentiers and scourgers of themselues of Crosse-bearers and Starrebearers of Minimes and of Bonehomes of Penitent sisters of Saccit of Bethlehemites of the seruantes of Marie of Georgians and many more This multiplication of Orders declareth that there was greater care amongst late Monkes to find out some dissimilitude of habite and ceremonies amongst themselues then to conforme themselues to the similitude of CHRIST The Orders of the Franciscans and Dominicans ouerspred the worlde about the 1200. yeere of our LORD Their number in short time was mightilie increased so that the Francisâ—…ans rejoyced that there were founde of their Order in diuers Nations two thousande one hundreth fourescore and sixe Monasteries And the Dominicans numbred foure thousande one hundreth and fourtie sixe Monasteries in EUROPE all professing their Order as Creccelius sometime an Augustine Monke reckoneth These were like vnto the Frogs of AEGYPT whose number made them to bee fearefull And like vnto the Grasse-hoppâ—…rs of AEGYPT which ate the residue that remained and escaped from the Haile These were like vnto Mothes in a garment like Myce in a barne like Caterpillers amongst corne and roust in mettals so offensiue vnto the world that the people groned for the oppression of begging Friers The Dominicans followed the rules of the Augustine Monks this is the cause wherefore Creccâ—…lius of whom we spake before reckoneth not the Dominicans as one of the principall stockes and rootes from which other Orders as branches did proceed Both these Orders of Franciscans and Dominicans had their allowance and confirmation from Innocentius the third who dreamed that the Church of Laterane was bowing and inclining to fall and that saint Francis and saint Dominicke set to their shoulders to vphold the decaying Church of Laterane What wonder is it that these Orders teach a doctrine of lyes dreames whose confirmation coulde not bee obtained vntill Pope Innocentius the third dreamed that these two did vphold the Church of Laterane In the Sermones of the begging Friers saint Francis is extolled with excessiue praises as if by long fasting earnest prayers and deepe meditations he had beene counted worthie to see Celestiall visions and to bee marked in handes feete and side with the markes of the sufferinges of CHRIST Notwithstanding of all these Hyperbolicke praises in the verie beginning of his deuotion hee beganne at theft and stole money from his father and gaue it to a Priest to helpe the reparation of the Church of saint Damian And for this cause his father tooke him and did beate him with manie stripes In so farre that they who doe pleade saint Francis cause deny not that hee tooke away his fathers money neither doe they deny that for this cause hee was chastised by his father but they call the foresaide chastilement persecution The Monkes and Friers of the Order of Saint DOMINICKE doe attribute vnto him both in his life-time and after his death the working of so manie and so great miracles as if it were their purpose not onely to preferre him vnto saint FRANCIS but also to equali him to CHRIST and to his Apostles Notwithstanding his greatest deuotion was in beating himselfe thrise â—…uerie night with an yron chaine partlie for his owne sinnes partlie for the sinnes of other men who were aliue and partlie for the sinnes of those who were in purgatorie This fact I saie was as foolish and derogatorie to the honour due to CHRIST and to the merites of his sufferinges as anie thing that was done by that notable foole saint FRANCIS The latest Orders such as the Iacobines and Capuscings are but branches of the Francisâ—…ane and Dominicane Orders and are famous as Erostratus was rather for euill then for good The lapuscings are fine Trumpetters to proclaime warre-fare against the Citie of GOD And the Iacobines are souldiours of Sathan to put hande to worke and to fight against the Heauen in not sparing the Anointed of GOD and him who was anointed with that Celestiall oile that came from aboue as they themselues and others of their Religion doe affirme Concerning the Iesuites who may more properlie bee called Layolites then Iesuites because they walke rather in the foote-steps of Layola the author of their sect then in the footesteps of IESUS who neuer taught any man to follow the way of Cain as they doe But Layola was a souldiour and delited in shedding of blood Of them I say I am in doubt whether to call them an Order or not for the old Aenigma is reuiued in them Vir non vir percussit non percussit lapide non lapide avem non avem super arbore non arbore Euen so the Layolites may be called an order and not an ordere because they will not be bound vnto a certaine habite as a distinguishing note separating them from other Orders lest by their habite they shoulde bee discouered and made knowne to Princes against whose estate they trafficke with most treasonable attemptes neither will they conteine themselues within their owne boundes as if they woulde counterfeit the Apostles but with a preposterous counterfeiting called by the Gracians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Apostles were the Ambassadours of CHRIST the Iesuites are the ambassadours of the antichrist the Apostles endeuoured to set vp the Throne of CHRIST by preaching the death of CHRIST the Iesuites endeuour to repaire the losse of the antichrist with the slaughter of Christian Princes O generation of Vipers the broode alreadie conceiued in their venomous breastes will bee their destruction as it is the destruction of the feminine Vipers but I leaue a description of their bloodie attemptes to others who haue better knowledge of the profundities of Sathan more clearely manifested in them then it was of olde in the tenne persecuting Emperours To all these fore-mentioned Orders one thing is common that they are all obliged bound by vowes of chastity pouerty obedience euery one to the atteÌ„dance of his owne order the Layolites haue added the vow of temperancie without which custody it is hard to keepe chastitie the vow of chastitie is good prouiding that Matrimonial chastity be included vnder the generality of the word
of images into cities they emptied cities of the feare of GOD and filled them with errour If a short description of some vanitie of images could exonere men from the blame of Idolatrie then might the Gentiles also be freed from the vile imputation of Idolatrie The Idolatrie of the Jewes fraughted not onely with vanitie but also with vnthankfulnesse and a contempt of the lawe of GOD proclaimed from mount Sinai doth leade vs vnto a deeper consideration of the vilenesse of Idolatrie The golden Calfe which they worshipped in the wildernesse and the staire of Remphan declare that the nature of man is so prone and bent to Idolatrie that we are bent to follow the sinnes of those people who hath beene most hatefull enemies vnto vs. The Aegyptians were grieuous oppressors of GODS people neuerthelesse the Iewes followed their Idolatrie in worshipping the Calfe On the other part the Moabites and Ammanites hired Balaam to curse them Notwithstanding of all this they tooke vp in the wilnernesse the tabernacle of Moloch and the starre of Rempham figures which they made to worship them It is an vnsupportable mischiefe and a remeadilesse maladie lurking in our corrupt nature when we are bent to follow the sinnes of people who hate vs and wishes all kinde of harme to vs both in soule and body so that learned men vpon great considerations had called Idolatrie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the madde bentnesse vpon Idoles When the Apostle PAVL is making a particulare enumeration of the sinnes which the Iewes committed in the wildernesse namely Idolatrie fornication tempting of Christ and murmuring remember that Idolatrie is set in the first place as the very fountaine of all apostacie and defection from GOD. For like as in a matrimoniall contract betwixt man and woman when the principall heade of the contract is broken and a woman hath giuen her affection and body to anotherman all the rest of the points of the contract which are subordinate to this will easily be dissolued euen so if Idolatrie once take place in our heartes so that wee giue the glory of God to creatures all other defection will easily ensue and follow Therefore in the dayes of Iosua when the people were zealous for the glory of God they could not abide any kinde of appearance of defection from the true worship of God but alas it fareth with zeale as it doth with a teare that is soone dried vp so doth the zeale to the glory of God hastely euanish from amongst the children of men Moreouer it is diligently to be marked that the Lord is very strict and precise in the matter of his worshipping not onely forbidding to worship the gods of the Canaanites but also forbidding to worship the true God after the forme of theâ—… bad worshipping but only according to the rule of his own blessed Commandement And for this cause the ten Tribes of Israel because they worshipped not God in Ierusalem but offered sacrifices vpon the altars of Bethel Gilgal and Bâ—…sheba they are counted of God as prophane Aethiopians people who were strangers from the couenant of God Therefore in the matter of diuine worship let these two rules continually be set before our eyes First to worshippe God alanerly and not his creatures secondly to worshippe him according to the râ—…le of his owne Commandement alanerly Finally amongst the rest of the vnhappie manners of the nation of the Jewes it is to be noted that when outward Idolatrie seemed to bee forsaken amongst them so that they were content rather to sacrifice their liues than to suffer the Images of the Romane Emperours to bee set vp in their Temple At this same time I say they were defiled with inward Idolatrie which is moste abominable of all other Idolatries For the Idole of all Idoles is this when a man maketh an Idole of himselfe preferring himselfe to God his own will to the CoÌ„mandement of God his owne wisdome to the misdome of God manisested to the world by his owne deare Sonne Iesus Christ but so it is that the nation of the Iewes at that same time when they fo sooke the worshipping of Idoles made with mens handes they forsooke also the Shepheard of their soules euen the true MESSIAS preferred a murtherer to him VVhereof this conâ—…lusion may bâ—…e iustly inferred that Idolatrie is not rightly fortaken except all idoles both outward and inward be laid aside Many wâ—…rnings the people of the Iewes gote to beware of Idolatâ—…ie yea the LORD threatned them that incace they would prouoke the LORD to anger by thinges that were not Gods 〈◊〉 LORD also would prouoke them to angeâ—… by a people that was not a people But when no warning could auaile the LORD cast them off into a reprobate minde and receiued the Gâ—…ntiles to be his peculiar people But at our very first entrie we haue this warning to be humble and obedient lest hee who spared not the naturall branches how much lesse will hee spare vs if we make defection In the last head I haue to intreat concerning the Images of the Romane Church which in the sixt Centurie were receiued into places of adoration yea and a litle after were adored and worshipped finally the adoration of Images gote allowance in generall Councills Now seeing I am not intreating of Images made for ornament or for memorie of ciuile actions but onely of adoration and the in-bringing of them into places of adoration Let vs remember that the Apostles were faithfull dispensators of those things which they receiued from CHRIST whether it was for the feeding of the bodies or of the soules of CHRISTS people when they receiued barlie loaues blessed by CHRISTS mouth and miraculously multiplied they distributed vnto the people that same bread and none other which they receiued out of Christs hands In like maner they were faithfull dispensatoâ—…s of that spirituall food which they receiued from CHRIST to feed the soules of his people vnto eternall life Now we neuer read that CHRIST taught his Apostles by pictures images in the knowledge of his eternall trueth neither that the Apostles taught any others to know GOD and to follow the vertuous footsteps of the Saintes by presenting dum be images vnto their sight therefore this forme of teaching smelleth of noueltie and came not from CHRIST and his Apostles for the Apostles receiued commandement from CHRIST to preach his worde and to minister his Sâ—…cramentes but not to present dumbe images to the sight of the people iustly called by the Prophet HABACCVK doctors of lies Secondly places of holy Scripture both in the Olde and New Testament doe so manisestly damne adoration of images that the moste obstinate desenders of worshipping of Images were compelled to leaue Scripture and take them to the authoritie of vnwritten traditions and Damascene expresly calleth the worshipping of images 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hee forgetteth not to remember the brasen
a Poetesse of Scycion were abhorred by the Gentiles because in her verses shee brought in Adonis matching Cucumbers and Aples with the sunne yet is it a more tolerable thing to match an earthly creature with a heauenly creature than to match creatures with the Creator who is blessed for euer After that this opinion of Indulgences and Pardons in a newe and Romane sense once tooke place it is a wonderfull thing to heare what progresse it made from euill to worse Some thought that by Pardones might bee obtained a reliefe from temporall punishments or at least a permutation of eternall punishments into temporall but others running as it were to the supeâ—…latiue excesse of all spirituall madnesse affirmed that by vertue of Popes 〈◊〉 men were absolued both from fault and punishment aâ—… 〈◊〉 Pardones were called Plenissima Indulgentiae Of this sort was the Pardone that BONIFACIVS the eight proclaimed to such as would come to Rome in time of his appointed Iubile and visite the Church of Lateran ann 1399. Of this which I haue alreadie spoken it is euident that the Papistes in the wordes of Satisfaction and Indulgences deceiue both themselues and others for what auaileth it to keepe the ancient wordes vsed in the primitiue Church and to vse them into a newe sense vnknowne to Fathers who spake of Satisfaction and Indulgences Did not the Athenians of olde weare the badge of the golden Grashopper in token they were not extraneers but they were inhabitants in that lande whereinto both their predecessors and themselues were borne but when they were conquessed by the Romanes and their golden libertie was lost what auailed the badge of the golden Grashopper Euen so when substance of ancient words is lost what auaileth it to talke of Satisfaction and Indulgences as ancient things In the rest of this Treatise God willing I shall declare the absurditie of Popish Satisfactions and Indulgences The Councill of Trent in the 12. Canon deoperibus Satisfactionis they write If any man says that the whole punishment and fault is continuallie remitted by GOD and that the Satisfaction of penitent persons is no other thing but faith whereby they apprehend that CHRIST hath satisfied for them let him bee accursed This Act of the Councill of Trent in all the parts of it is flatly repugant to the Scriptures of God There we are taught that in Satisfaction two thinges are principally required First a perfect obedience to the Lawe of GOD. Secondly a perfect sacrifice for the sinne committed by man both these things are to bee found in CHRIST alone who by his obedience hath abolished the sinnewhich came in by the disobedience of ADAM and by one oblation hath consecrated for euer them who are sanctified Nowe to pronounce a curse against all them who leanes vnto the obedience and sacrifice of CHRIST as vnto their onely Satisfaction to the Iustice of GOD is all one as if they would pronounce a curse against all the true disciples of CHRIST who beleeues according as they are taught in the holy Scriptures of GOD. If at any time ancient Fathers speake roundly in this matter it is ourparte to doe that fauour to them which is done to all men to wit to giue them libertie to interprete the meaning of their owne wordes So when AMBROSE writteth that teares washes away sinnes hee declareth in what sense hee spake this to wit not to count the teares of PETER to bee a satisfaction for his threefolde deniall but rather that his teares was a testimonie that hee was one of the Elect for whose sinnes CHRIST had satisfied The wordes of S. AMBROSE are these Legi quidem Petri lachrymas sed satisfactionem non lego that is to say I haue reade of the teares of PETER but of his satisfaction I reade not The Romanists in our dayes are like vnto men who haue benetrauelled vpon the Sea and in end they arriue to the harberie and when they set their foot on shore they thinke that the ground is running about them in a circulare reuolution This is nothing els but the conceates of their troubled braines euen so when Papistes reades in holy Scripture many exhortations to Fasting Prayer Almesdeedes they imagine that Scripture is speaking of Satisfactions for sinne But holy Scripture is like vnto the solide globe of the earth which is not vnder a continuall agitation but is euer like vnto it selfe and sendes vs continuallie in the matter of Satisfaction to that one oblation which hath consecrated for euer them who are sanctified Yea the false teachers of our dayes are like vnto the Edomites who were more cruell than the Babylonians who contented themselues with slaying of some and carying of others captiues and setting the towne on fire but the children of Edâ—…m câ—…ied out that the very foundations of the citie should be razed to the end it should neuer be a citie againe euen so they who sends vs to our owne satisfactions they would vndoe our sâ—…luation from the very ground as if Christ had beene manifested in our nature in vaine to make satisfaction for our sinnes for which wee must make satisfaction in our owne persons and by our owne workes our selues The principall argument whereby they endeuoure to prooue humane satisfactions by Scripture is in the wordes of the counsell of DANIEL giuen to NABVCHADNESER Wherefore O King let my counsell be acceptable unto thee and breake off thy sinnes by righteousnesse and thine iniquities by mercie toward the poore Loe let there be an healing of thine errour What is conteined in this most wholesome counsell of DANIEL but an exhortation to leaue off the course of doing euill and to doe good to the ende that the change of his conuersation might be a testimonie that GOD had forgiuen him his sinnes and accepted him in fauour The like wholesome counsell the Apost PAVL giueth to them who had sometimes bene theeues Let him that stole steale no more but let him rather labour and worke with his handes the thing which is good that hee may haue to giue vnto him that needeth Is there anything heere but an exhortation to desist from wonted vngodlinesse and to leade a newe and holy conuersation but the Apostle is speaking nothing of humane satisfactions yea that the holy Spirit who filled his mind with celestiall knowledge sanctified also his memorie that hee should speake nothing repugnant vnto that hee writeth vnto the Hebrewes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is By one oblation hee hath consecrated for euer them who are sanctified And the Apostle IOHN writing to to them who were already baptized and counted the children of GOD he sayeth My babes these things I write vnto you that yee sinne not and if any man sinne wee haue an Aduocate with the Father Iesus Christ the Iust. So that this new Theologie of our owne satisfactions for faultes committed after Baptisme came not from CHRIST and his Apostles but it is an inucntion of
the braine of man Likewise Christ in holy Scripture is called the Lambe of God who taketh away the sinnes of the world It is great obliuion in men to magnifie the finger which pointed out Christ so much as to count it incorruptible that the fire hath no power to burne it and it is an holy relique in the Romane Church and on the other part to bee so forgetfull of the golden sentence which hee vttered at the pointing foorth of his finger namely that CHRIST was the Lambe of GOD that is the onely propitiatorie sacrifice for our sinnes for that Lambe which was offered in the morning and the euening in the olde TESTAMENT did not represent our satisfactions but only the propitiatorie sacrifice which CHRIST offered vpon the Crosse for our sinnes The doctrine of Augustine agreeing with Scripture was this That CHRIST taketh away our sinnes three maner of wayes First by forgiuing the sinnes wee haue committed Secondly by supporting vs with his grace that wee should not commit the like in time to come and thirdly by bringing vs vnto eternall life where wee shall be free from committing of sinne Finally the writings of the Prophets and Apostles anent the doctrine of Satisfaction pointeth out CHRIST alanerly by whome wee obteine forgiuenesse of our sinnes as the Apostle PETER speaketh to CORNELIVS in these words To him also giue all the Prophets witnesse that through his Name all that beleene in him shall receiue remission of sinnes If this bee the summe of the doctrine of the Prophets and Apoâ—…es they who contend so seriously to prooue mens satisfactions for faultes committed after Baptisme they striue against the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles As concerning the worde Indulgentia what it did signifie of olde in the primitiue Church I haue already declared to wit a mitigation of the strict discipline vsed against great offenders but this matter will bee better vnderstood if it bee deduced froÌ„ the very first ground In time of the ten great persecutions many were found weake who fell away from the open profession of the trueth and sacrificed to Idoles The dayly increasing number of back-sliders from the trueth compelleâ—… the Church to enter into a deepe consideration howe this defection might bee stayed Novatus was in this opinion that they who made defection in the time of the ten persecutions should not bee admitted againe to the fellowship of the Church albeit they did repent This opinion was too rigorous and repugnant to Scripture Others thought it more expedient to institute Sermoâ—…s to bee preached at solemne times such as Natalitia MartyruÌ„ whereby the great coÌ„mendation of the constant Faith sufferings of the Martyres euen vnto the death might make these timorous backsliders ashamed of their defection on the other part if any of them craued to bee receiued againe into the bosome of the Church that they should testifie their repentance by publicke Satisfaction so many yeeres as was prescribed vnto them by Church discipline the mitigation of the rigour of this discipline was called Indulgentia In our dayes it is taken in another sense for an absolution from fault and punishment at the least from one of them and a dispensation of the merites of CHRIST and his Sainctes to offenders This abuse of ancient wordes to the noueltie of a new fact vnknown to Fathers makes Popish Religion iustly suspect to such as considereth their aberration from antiquitie albeit they bragge of it continually in so much that it may bee saide of them which Philip King of Maccdone spake of a Iudge who dyed his haire that he who was false in a matter of haire would ncuer bee true in a matter of Iudgement so the miserable abuse of the worde Indulgentia prognosticateth horrible abuse in the matter it selfe If any man demand howe doth this Treatise of Indulgences belong vnto this Centurie seeing that Indulgences and Pardones against which I write were not as yet in vse in the Romane Church yea we read not of Plenissimae Indulgentiae à poena à culpa before the 1200. yeere of our Lord. To this I answere that in this Centurie they were opening a passage to that which after followed As Iulian the Apostate when hee cutted a parcell of ground hee opened a passage to Euphrates to runne into Tigris and so procured that his shippes should arriue at Ctesiphon a towne situated vpon Tigris and not vpon Euphrates euen so in this Centurie the bishoppes of Rome were inlarging the power of their keyes which power they extended so amplie that they durst excommunicate Emperours at their pleasure and the posteritie following them finding the power to bee ample they tooke vpon them authoritie to absolue in earth from fault and paine persons whome GOD promised not to absolue in heauen because they were not penitent The two greatest absurdities in late Pardones are these First an absolution from fault punishment vnder another condition than is contained in the written worde of GOD. For there it is expresly written When the wicked turneth away from his wickednesse that hee hath committed and doth that which is lawfull and right hee shall saue his soule aliue But the Pardone of Pope BONIFACIVS the eight containeth a full absolution from fault and punishment vpon condition that men trauell to Rome in time of Iubile and visite the Church of Lateran If an Officer to whom the Kings letters are concredite did proclame his Highnes letters another way than they were first conceiued and stamped with the Kings signet hee would be counted a false messenger and would bee remooued from his office but hee who dare presume to alter the message of the great King to promise forgiuenesse to him to whom GOD hath not promised it in his owne written worde hee is a false teacher Promising liberue to others when as himselfe is a seruant of corruption as the Apostle speakes Before this great sinne was amended another greater sinne was added vnto it and Pardones were solde for money by which doing the bishoppes of Rome ceased from beeing the successours of SIMON PETER and became successours of SIMON MAGVS The Apostle commendeth in the Corinthians before they absolued the incestuous Adulterer godly sorrowe care a clearing of themselues holie indignation feare zeale and punishment amongst other thinges hee commendeth in them an earnest desire to wit of the conuersion of him who had fallen into an hainous transgression The worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vsed by the Apostle is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say an earnest desire of money but rather an carnest desire of the repentance of him who had offended The horrible abuse of Pardones solde for money were knowne to all Nations in Europe especially to the Countrie of Germanie to whome Pardones were sent both for sinnes by-past and for sinnes to come with Ticelius an eloquent Orator but Pardones at that time were come to the height and could consist no
sentence pronounced by the mouth of GOD from heauen but what shall we say gods Inpiter Amminius was formed with the body of a man but with the head of a Ramme Dagon whome the Philistims worshipped had the similitude of a man in the vppermost partes but the similitude of a fish in the lower partes of his body And Pan the god of shepheards was pictured with hornes in his head with the feete of goates and rough in all his body as if he had beene ouerlapped with the skinne of an vnshorne Ram. They became vaine in their imaginations and their foolish heart was full of darkenesse Yâ—…a as the Prophet speaketh the makers of them were like vnto them that is senslesse blinde and dead hearted and so were the worshippers of them Against the Gentiles who were Idolaters a woe is pronounced by the Prophet in these words Woe be to hun that saith to the wood awakâ—… and to the dumbe stone arise vp c. Let vs take diligent atâ—…endance to these words because GOD hath spoken tâ—…em by the mouth of his Prophet The Gentiles excused their Idolatrie so did the Iewes theirs and the Pâ—…pistes will seeme to honour GOD and his Saints in their Images but leâ—… all flâ—…sh be dumbe and siâ—…ent heare what the LORD speaketh from his Sâ—…nctuary Wâ—…e be to him that saith to wood awakâ—… The Pagans Iewes and Papists aâ—…e like vnâ—…o Adonâ—…iah loab and 〈◊〉 Thâ—…se were all banqueâ—…ting together euery one of them streng hened another in their foolish couâ—…se and they all said with one consâ—…nt God saue King Adonâ—…ah But there was another kind of conference in the chamber of King DAVID which did vndoe all their conferences and appointed that SALOMON should reiâ—…ne eâ—…en so notwithstanding of all the foolâ—…sh excuses wherewith Gentiles Iewes and Papistes excuse their Idolatrie GOD is like vnto himselfe and he pronounceth a wâ—…e against it The Papistes thinke that they hau fully sâ—…tisfied both GOD and good men when they grant there is no diâ—…inite in the Image and in substance iâ—… is a corruptible thing and the portrature of it is fashioned by the hand of the craftesmen Did not the Gentiles as much Did not Plato count the Images of most precious substance most vnprofitable to the people Did not Fabius Mâ—…ximus despise the Idoles of Tarentum as angrie Images agâ—…inst their owne people who depended vpon them Did not the Poet grant that iâ—… lay in the artificers hand either to make a bench or a god of the wild fig tree that came into his hands the verses are vulgarly knowne and in all mens mouthes Olim truncus eram ficulinus inutile lignum Cùm faber incertus scamnum facerétne Priapum Maluit esse Deum Yea Marcus Varro whose testimonie August citeth lib. 4. de Civitate Dei hee saide Qui primi civitatibus simulachra invexerunt metum dempserunt errorem addiderunt that is to say The first in bringers of images into cities they emptied cities of the feare of GOD and filled them with errour If a short description of some vanitie of images could exonere men from the blame of Idolatrie then might the Gentiles also be freed from the vile imputation of Idolatrie The Idolatrie of the Iewes fraughted not onely with vanitie but also with vnthankfulnesse and a contempt of the lawe of GOD proclaimed from mount Sinai doth leade vs vnto a deeper consideration of the vilenesse of Idolatrie The golden Calfe which they worshipped in the wildernesse and the starre of Remphan declare that the nature of man is so prone and bent to Idolatrie that we are bent to follow the sinnes of those people who hath beene most hatefull enemies vnto vs. The Aegyptians were grieuous oppressors of GODS people neuerthelesse the Iewes followed their Idolatrie in worshipping the Calfe On the other part the Moabites and Ammonites hired Balaam to curse them Notwithstanding of all this they tooke vp in the wilnernesse the tabernacle of Moloch and the starre of Rempham figures which they made to worship them It is an vnsupportable mischiefe and a remeadilesse maladie lurking in our corrupt nature when we are bent to follow the sinnes of people who hate vs and wishes all kinde of harme to vs both in soule and body so that learned men vpon great considerations had called Idolatrie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the madde bentnesse vpon Idoles When the Apostle PAVL is making a particulare enumeration of the sinnes which the Iewes committed in the wildernesse namely Idolatrie fornication tempting of Christ and murmuring remember that Idolatrie is set in the first place as the very fountaine of all apostacie and defection from GOD. For like as in a matrimoniall contract betwixt man and woman when the principall heade of the contract is broken and a woman hath giuen her affection and body to another man all the rest of the points of the contract which are subordinate to this will easily be dissolued euen so if Idolatrie once take place in our heartes so that wee giue the glory of God to creatures all other defection will easily ensue and follow Therefore in the dayes of Iosuae when the people were zealous for the glory of God they could not abide any kinde of appearance of defection from the true worship of God but alas it fareth with zeale as it doth with a teare that is soone dried vp so doth the zeale to the glory of God hastely euanish from amongst the children of men Moreouer it is diligently to be marked that the Lord is very strict and precise in the matter of his worshipping not onely forbidding to worship the gods of the Canaamtes but also forbidding to worship the true God after the forme of their bad worshipping but only according to the rule of his own blessed Commâ—…ndement And for this cause the ten Tribes of Israel because they worshipped not God in Ierusalem but offered sacrifices vpon the altars of Bethel Gilgal and Beâ—…sheba they are counted of God as prophane Aethiopians people who were strangers from the couenant of God Therefore in the matter of diuine worship let these two rules continually be set before our eyes First to worshippe God alanerly and not his creatures secondly to worshippe him according to the rule of his owne Commandement alanerly Finally amongst the rest of the vnhappie manners of the nation of the Iewes it is to be noted that when outward Idolatrie seemed to bee forsaken amongst them so that they were content rather to sacrifice their liues than to suffer the Images of the Romane Emperours to bee set vp in their Temple At this same time I say they were defiled with inward Idolatrie which is moste abominable of all other Idolatries For the Idole of all Idoles is this when a man maketh an Idole of himselfe preferring himselfe to God his own will to the CoÌ„mandement of God his owne wisdome to the misdome of God
are iustified by faith onely The Apostle wisely considered that no man could liue spiritually except hee had a fellowshippe with GOD. Againe there is no fellowshippe that mortall and sinfull men can haue with GOD without remission of sinnes Neither is there any remission of sinnes without 〈◊〉 Mediatour and Aduocate And wee can take no holde of this Mediatour except onely by faith so that by faith wee liue and by faith we are made iust in the sight of GOD. Then this place of Scripture teacheth vs that it is faith onely that leadeth vs vnto CHRIST in whome wee finde righteousnesse and life but by a due and competent order to wit by stripping vs naked of all conceate of our owne strength and righteousnesse to the ende wee may haue the greater delite in the saluation that is offered to vs in CHRIST Faith is not like vnto a robber who strippeth a mannaked without any purpose to clothe him with a better garment But faith doth to vs as the father of the forlorue sonne did to him and as the Angell of GOD did to IEHOSVA the high Priest Both these were vnclothed of their beggerly rayments but onely of purpose to clothe them with better apparell so doth faith strippe vs naked of all vaine conceate of our owne righteousnesse to the ende it may leade vs to the wardrope of GOD there to bee cladde with the garment of the righteousnesse of CHRIST which is able to couer our nakednesse and to present vs holy blamelesse and vndefiled before his father Before I leaue the wordes of the Prophet HABACCVK let vs yet againe ponder the Emphaticke worde Behold for by seeing and hearing some good lessons may bee learned Beholde men who haue leaned vpon the staffe of GOD in our owne time how peaceably haue they concluded their dayes with SIMEON reioycing that they had scene the saluation of GOD. And on the other side men who haue leaned to their own righteousnesse albeit only in a part what agonie trouble of conscience haue they found in their last battell vntill they haue forsaken all confidence in their owne merits and leaned onely vnto the merites of the passion of our sweet LORD and Sauiour IESVS CHRIST The Papistes in our COVNTRIE for the most part haue beene like vnto the fishes called Amphbia which can liue both in the Sea and on the Land but when any man approaches neere to doe them harme they trust more to the sca than to the land euen so when the terrors of death beginnes to shake our countrey people then they leaue confidence in their owne merites and betake themselues vnto the deepe Ocean sea of the mercies of GOD in IESVS CHRIST In the second heade I promised to speake of the difference betwixt Iustification Sanctification betwixt the righteousnes of the Law and the Gospell Our Iustification is a free forgiuenes of our sinnes for CHRISTS sake and a free imputation of his righteousnesse to vs. Our Sanctification is an inherent holinesse begunne in vs by the operation of GODS Spirit to bee a testimonie that wee are in CHRIST The not obseruing of the difference betwixt these two hath beene and as yet is the ground of great errours True it is that these two gifts are freely bestowed vpon vs at one and the selfe-same time yet are they distinct in order of causes because Iustification is the ground from whence Sanctification as an effect doth flow And like as the starres called Pleiades or Vergiliae they doe arise and manifest themselues vnto the worlde all at one time yet are they distinct starres and Electra is not Alcinoe nor Alcinoe Celeno nor Celeno Mâ—…ia And the like may bee spoken of the other tâ—…ree whose apparition and disparition albeit it bee inseparable yet are they distinct starres Euen so Iustification and Sanctification are inseparably linked together yet are they two distinct giftes of GOD. I will vse yet another similitude for declaration of the same purpose If a sword be laide into the fire vntill the mettall thereof be firie coloured this sworde at one time hath two powers one to cut and another to burne yet is not cutting burning nor burning cutting but these two distinct powers are at one time inseparably in one subiect Euen so are wee at one and the selfe same time both iustified and sanctified yet are they still two different giftes of GOD. Nowe the doctrine of Iustification rightly taught is our cihefe incouragement to Sanctification and on the other parte the doctrine of Sanctification rightly taught giueth vnto vs the greatest assurance of our Iustification A man who is assured that his sinnes are freely forgiuen that hee is beloued of GOD in CHRIST yea and that hee hath put on CHRIST as the Apostle speaketh he may with courage and gladnesse addresse himselse to lead an holy life being fully perswaded that GOD will accept of his willing obedience albeit it can not be perfect in all points so long as wee dwell into this sinsull tabernacle And on the other side when the spirit of sanctification worketh in our members it is a token that we are incorporated into the stocke of CHRIST by true faith For like as the spirit of man quickneth no member that is cut off from his bodie euen so the spirit of CHRIST worketh not true sanctification in any person who is not made a member of Christes body by true iustifying faith For this cause the Romane Church blames vs vndeseruedly as though by teaching that we are iustified only by faith we had impaired the zeale of the people in doing of good workes To this I answere that more credite is to be giuen to the holy Apost PAVL who was taught in all trueth immediatly by Christ himselfe nor to the calumnies of the aduersaries of the doctrine of grace for the Apostle exhorting the Romanes to agodly conuersation he saith I beseech you brethren sor the mercies of God that yee offer vp your bodies an holy liuely and acceptable sacrifice to God and what mercies are those I pray you whereof the Apostle speaketh but the mercies whereof hee hath intreated in the former parte of that Epistle to wit GOD hath freely elected vs he hath freely instified vs he hath freely sanctified vs and hee shall freely in his appointed time glorifie vs. Nowe in regard of all these mercies let vs endeuoure to leade a holy conuersation as it becommeth them who are partakers of so great mercies This holy exhortation could not haue beene drawne from a more pithie more persuasiue and mouing ground Therefore wee will walke in the footsteps of the holy Apostles and continue still exhorting the people to leade an holy conuersation in regarde of the rich mercies of GOD in CHRIST who hath freely elected them to eternall life and freely iustified them by faith in CHRIST alanerly Whereas they obiect that experience it selfe testifieth that people are not nowe so bent and readie to doe good
like maner I say to Papistes that their naked assertions not confirmed by testimonies of holy Scripture are nothing to vs but wee may lay them aside with as great libertie as they are prodigall in allcadging them Wee will answere to such arguments as seeme to be countenanced with some appearance of Scripture Now they say that the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 frequently vsed in Scripture importeth the merite of our good workes because GOD vouchsafeth vpon them a rewarde To this I answere that if Scripture be conserred with Scripture that same thing which in one place is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a reward in another place it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is an heritage in these wordes Come yee blessed of my father inherite the Kingdome prepared for you from the foundations of the world When that thing which properly is an inheritance is called a reward it is spoken metaphorically in respect it is giuen in the end of the world as an hire is giuen to a feruant in the end of the day The second argument proouing the merite of mens works and consequently Iustification by workes in a part is this that some men in Scripture are called worthie as when it is saide to the Angell of the Church of Sardis Thou hast a few names yet in Sardis which haue not defiled their garments and they shall walke with me in white for they are worthie To this I answere the godly are called worthie not in themselues but in Christ who hath made them Kings and Priestes vnto GOD. In themselues they are called vnworthie as when it is said No man was found wortbie to open and to read the booke And in another place it is saide that the afflictions of this present time are not Wortlne of the glorie that it to be shewed vnto vs. Nowe it is knowne that patient suffering of euill for Christes sake is a degree of greater obedience than willing doing of good and if the suffering of the Sainctes be not worthie of the glory that is to be reueiled how much lesse can our doings bee worthie of that glorious inheritance The third argument is taken from the nature of a conditionall couenant bound vp betwixt two parties which doe import that condition should bee keeped but so it is that GOD hath couenanted with such as liue a godly life that they shall dwell in the holy mountaine of God therefore by vertue of this Couenant men who ieades a good life are worthie to dwel in heauen To this I answere that this couenant foresaid is either Legal or Euangelicall if it be Legall we cannot fulfill the condition thereof because the Law requireth a perfect obedience which we cannot attaine vnto If it bee an Euangelicall couenant the Mediator of the newe couenant IESVS Christ is present at the couenant making for whose sake I grant that GOD promiseth vnto vs a dwelling place in heauen and for his sake also he performeth his promise giueth vnto vs a resting place in his holy Mountaine and in all this haue we no cause to reioyce in our selues but in the mercies of our GOD. Concerning our satisfactions whereby the Romane Church saith That sinnes committed after baptisme should be pardoned This belongeth to another Treatise of Indulgences and satisfactions for the present I ouerpasse this point of mens merites with silence The Romane Church that Mistresse of errour hath not onely learned vs to leane vpon our owne merites but also to leane vpon the merites of other men such as holy Prophets Apostâ—…es and Martyres because some of them haue not onely fulfilled the Commandements of GOD but also haue done more than the Law of GOD commanded For example the Lawe of GOD forbiddeth to commit adulterie fornication and all kind of vncleannesse but many of the Apostles Prophets Martyres not only abstained from all kind of whordome but also from mariage such workes are called in the Romane Church workes of supererogation these doe come into the treasure of the Bishop of Rome as the Vicar of Christ and he is a dispensator of them to such as haue need O deepenesse of errours forged by Sathan repugnant vnto it selfe If abstinence from mariage bee a worke of supererogation then either must mariage euen in men hauing a spirituall calling bee counted a thing lawfull and agreable to GODS holy Law or else the abstinence from it cannot bee called a worke of supererogation I grant that some fathers counted abstinence from mariage a worke of Evangelicall perfection like as the selling of all their possessions and distributing them to the poore but it entred not in their hearts to call such workes of Evangelicall perfection workes of supererogation to bee sent to the treasure of the bishop of Rome that he might bee a dispensator of them to such as had neede But nowe suppone that any such workes had beene in the Sainctes of GOD howe can they bee imperted and communicated to others Can the oyle of the wise Virgines bee distributed to the foolish Virgines It cannot be because it cannot suffice them both Likewise when wee compeare before the iudge of the worlde wee must compeare clad with the innocencie of CHRIST and not with the merites of his Sainctes for the Apostle saith Put on the Lord Iesus but hee saith not Put on the merites of the Sainctes Moreouer wee must bee acceptable as the holy Prophets Apostles and Martyres were acceptable but so it is that they were acceptable to GOD onely in Christ as the Apostle saith If any man sinne we haue an aduocate with the Father Iesus Christ the iust Here none exception is made of Prophets Apostles Martyres but all must be acceptable to GOD for Christs sake allanerly Finally the holymen of God when they die they rest from their labours and their workes follow them If the soules of the holy fathers doe goe to heauen to the bosome of ABRAHAM to the paradise of GOD howe can wee thinke that their workes doe goe to the treasure of the bishop of Rome except they would say that the soules of all the holy fathers are gone to the treasure of the bishop of Rome also and their works and merites following them are altogether lighted in his treasure But lest I should anticipate the treatise of Indulgences I referre all farder discourse vnto the owne place Intreating the Lord Iesus of his vnspeakable fauour to remooue the mistie cloud of ignorance from our soules that our heartes bee not transported from the loue of the Creator to the loue of the creatures but that we may seeke saluation in Christ in whom only it may be found to whom be praise for euer AMEN FINIS A SHORT COMPEND of the grouth of the ROMANE ANTICHRIST Comprised in the VII VIII and IX CENTURIES WHEREVNTO ARE ADDED TREATISES CLEARLY declaring the noueltie of POPISH RELIGION EDINBVRGH PRINTED BY ANDRO HART ANNO 1616. TO THE
Papistes woulde make it to sâ—…eme probable that the Antichrist is one singulare man onelie is taken from the force of the prepositiue article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A childish argument indeede as who woulde saye that it were not lawfull to praye in anie chamber except in one onâ—…lie in respect of the prepositiue article set before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in these wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Enter into thy chamber The time of the continuance of the Antichristes persecution three yeeres and an halfe is borrowed from Augustine who supposeth that the horne which shall speake words against the moste High and who shall chaunge times and lawes as thinges giuen vnto his handes vntilla time and times and the diuiding of a time by this horne I saye Augustine supposeth the Antichrist to be presented how beit others more judiciously haue referred this prophesie to Antiochus Epiphanes who blasphemed God chaunged Sabboâ—…hs and Festiuall dayes yea and by his impious lawes presumed to abrogate the law of the Almightie God and immediatelie after such presumptuous attempts God shortened his dayes for within the space of three yeeres and some fewe dayes hee ended his life in moste miserable manner They haue no better grounde to affirme that the Antichrist shall be of the Tribe of Dan than this Because the Tribe of Dan is not reckoned amongst the rest of the Tribes Apocal. 7. yet this was not done to exclude this Tribe from the sauing marke of Christ but to giue place to the Tribe of Leui and not to exceede the number of twelue Tribes for Holie Scripture which commendeth the faith of Barak of the Tribe of Nephtali and Gideon of the Tribe of Manasse and Iphtah of the Tribe of Gad commendeth also the faith of Samson of the Tribe of Dan Hebr. cap. 2. vers 11. One thing I cannot passe by The inuenters of such fables that the Antichrist shoulde bee of the Tribe of Dan borne in Babylon c. in some thinges haue ouer-seene themselues miserablie namelie when they affirme that the Antichrist shall build the Temple of Hierusalem and shall sit there in the Temple of God and the nation of the Iewes shall adhere vnto him and immediatelie after this the ende of the worlde shall come and Christ shall destroye the Antichrist by the Spirit of his mouth Heere marke the great contradiction that is betwixt the prophesie of Paul concerning the conuersion of the Iewes before the seconde comming of Christ and the foolish opinion of Papistes Paul saieth that the Iewes shall bee conuerted to the true faith before the Great daye of the LORDES seconde appearance but Papistes saye that the Iewes shall bee adhering to the Antichrist when Christ shall come to judge the worlde and to destroye the Antichrist by the brightnesse of his comming These two opinions cannot both consist therefore let the fable inuented by men fall that place may bee giuen to the trueth of God who is blessed for euermore AMEN A TREATISE Of the Antichrist CONTROVERSIES in ciuill matters are not all of like moment therefore it was ordained by the counsell of Iethro that great matters shoulde be brought to Moses and that inferiour Magistrates should judge in small causes But in controuersies of religion all causes both great and small are to bee brought vnto the mouth of Christ our true Moses who will speake from his Sanctuarie vnto vs and giue vnto vs resolution of all our doubtes out of His blessed worde In this TREATISE especially let vs runne to the month of Christ speaking by his Apostle Paul and vttering a notable prephesie concerning the comming of the Antichrist in the wordes following Let no man deceiue you by anie meanes for that day shall not come except there come a departing first and that that man of sinne bee dâ—…sclosed euen the sonne of perdition Who is an aduersarie and exalteth himselfe against all that is called God or that is worshipped so that hee doeth sit as God in the Temple of God shewing himselfe that hee is God Remember yee not that when I was with you I tolde you these things And nowe yee knowe what with-holdeth that hee might bee reuealed in his time For the mysterie of iniquitie doeth alreadie worke onelie hee who nowe with-holdeth shall let tell hee bee taken out of the way And then shall the wicked man bee reuealed whom the Lord shall consume with the Spirit of His mouth and shall abolish with the brightnesse of his comming Euen him whose comming is by the working of Sathan with all power and signes and lying wonders And in all deceiueablenesse of vnrighteousnesse amongst them that perish because they receiued not the loue of the trueth that they might bee saued And therefore God shall sende to them strong delusion that they shall beleeuelies That all they might bee damned who beleeued not the trueth but had pleasure in vnrighteousnesse The occasion mouing the Apostle to embarke into this Prâ—…pheticall prediction concerning the comming of the Antichrist was this Because some in Thessalonica spake of the second comming of Christ that it was neare approaching and euen at hand The Apostle on the other part woulde assure the Thessalonians that before the comming of that Great day there should first be a defection from the true faith and that the Antichrist should be disclosed It is not the purpose of the Apostle to disswade anie man from remembring the terrour of that Great daye wherein the verie Elements shall melt and if so be what manner of men aught we to be in holy conuersation looking for and hastening vnto the comming of the day of our Lord yea and the obliuion of the second comming of Christ is the principall grounde of the securitie of the euill seruant But the Apostle ledde by the conduct of the Holy Spirite fore-seeing that two things were needfull to bee remembered to wit the seconde comming of the Lord Iesus and the preceeding comming of the Antichrist hee would haue them so to remember the one that they should not forget the other lest whilest wee runne fast to the marke without marking the perilles that are in the waye wee fall into the snares of the Deuil Our maister Christ when he corrected the foolish precipitation of the sonnes of Zebedeus who woulde haue sitten at the right and left hand of Christ in His kingdome before they had beene baptized with his baptisme and before they had drunken of the cuppe of the sufferings of Christ hee disswadeth them not from continuall fastning their eyes vpon the glorie of Christes Kingdome but rather so to looke vnto the marke that they ouer-leape not the waye leading to the marke God hath indâ—…edep epared a kingdome for vs but by many tribulations we must enter into that kingdome The apostasie whereof the apostle prophecieth is not a desection in manners onely but also a departing from the faith as
when as of olde the people were wont to communicate euerie daye and therefore hee calleth the Lordes Supper a daylie sacrifice The Papistes are so farre from reproouing the people for not communicating that they make prouision onely for one to eate and drinke at the Altar and not for manie and they inuite not the people to communicate with them but rather by the noueltie of their newe inuented religion they distinguishe the Altar from the Communion table and the Sacrifice from the SacrameÌ„t farre contrarie to the custome of the Primitiue Church who by a Metaphore called the Sacrament a Sacrifice and by the like Metaphore called the Communion table an Altar If anie man will rudely presse the wordes of Chrysostome expresse contrarie to his meaning let him vnderstand that the like forme of speaking is vsed in Holy Scripture where it is saide And no â—…an receiued his testimonie to wit the testimonie of Christ. The meaning is not that no bodie receiued the testimonie of Christ but that verie fewe receiued it Euen so the meaning of the words of Chrysostome is that verie fewe of the people did communicate And this hath bene verie judiciously marked by Master IEWELL that worthie Bishop in his disputation against master Harding To bee short in this head of Antiquitie of the Popish Masse Their bragging of Antiquitie is not vnlike to the Gibeonites shoos which were olde and put on of purpose to deceiue yet were not their shoos so olde as the shoos of GODS people which by the miraculous worke of GOD lasted fourtie yeeres in the Wildernesse and were not rent GODS people might haue bragged indeede of ancient and vnrent shoos but the deceitful Gibeonites they bragged and deceiued Gods people with antiquitie falsely pretended Such is the antiquitie of the masse and no better Before I leaue this head I will admonishe the Reader not to bee deceiued with olde Latine transations of Grieke Authors Socrates writeth of the fauourers of Paulinus that after hee died they communicated not with Flauianus bishop of Antiochia but they kept Assemblies apart by themselues Nowe the wordes of the Grieke language 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is better translated this way Separatim conuentus faciebant than as some olde Latine interpreters translate the wordes Separatim missarum celebrabant solennia howbeit the olde interpreters by missarum solennia vnderstand nothing but Ecclesiasticall conuentions IN the second head we haue the definition of the Masse to be set downe and to bee examined The Masse is called a sacrifice propitiatorie vnbloodie wherein the Priest offereth the bodie of the Sonne of God to the Father vnder the formes of bread and wine and that without suffering for the sinnes of the quicke and the dead From the worde of Sacrifice auncient Fathers did not abhorre but they called the Holy Sacrament a Sacrifice of thankesgiuing and a commemoratiue Sacrifice of the death of Christ the wordes of Augustine are these Hujus sacrifitii caro ante aduentum Christi per victimas similitudinum promittebatur in passione per ipsam veritatem reddebatur post ascensum Christi per sacramentum memoriae celebratur that is to say The flesh of this sacrifice was promised by sacrifices of similitudes In the suffering of Christ it was in verie deede exhibited and after the ascension of Christ it is celebrated by a Sacrament of His memoriall In these wordes Augustine distinguisheth a sacrifice prefiguratiue before Christes comming and a sacrifice commemoratiue after the Lordes ascension from the sacrifice of Christes bodie in veritie and actually exhibited vpon the crosse other sacrifices point out as types and figures the great sacrifice of the bodie of Christ once offered vpon the crosse but they are not that selfe same sacrifice except by a figuratiue manner of speach And like as the towne Nicopolis was not the victorie of Augustus Casar when hee faught against Antonius and Cleopatra but it was onely a memoriall of the victorie Euen so the commemoratiue sacrifice of the new Testament is not the true sacrifice of Christes bodie but only a memoriall of that blessed sacrifice Iustinus Martyr had good occasion offered vnto him to write of the sacrifices of Christes Church because Paganes slaundered Christians and called them Atheistes in regarde they offered not bloodie sacrifices nor incense vnto their God to whome Iustinus returned this answere That Christians offered to GOD such sacrifices as they knew to bee moste acceptable to Him to wit the sacrifices of prayer and thankesgiuing And as concerning the creatures of God appointed for the sustentation of mankinde we keepe them saith hee for our owne vse and for the sustentation of indigent people but we consume them not with fire If there had bene anie corporal sacrifice in the Church of the bodie of the Sonne of God vnder the formes of bread and wine Iustinus had occasion offered vnto him to haue spoken of it but hee knew no such sacrifice in his time Yea and the sacrament of the Lords Supper is called by Iustinus a Sacrifice of thanksgiuing who confidently affirmeth that prayer thanksgiuing are the onely sacrifices perfect and acceptable to GOD euen at that time when the Sacrament is ministred which putteth vs in remembrance of the Lordes suffering Testimonies out of the bookes of ancient Fathers should bee cited without fraude and deceite and should not bee wrested to another sense and meaning than they were spoken into by the Authors And so the worde Sacrifice could offend no man if it were spoken in such sense as ancient Fathers spake it The Romane Church shoulde doe well so to remember the names that ancient Fathers haue giuen to the Sacrament that they shoulde not forget that Holy Scripture calleth it a Communion of the bodie and blood of Christ. Then let it be such a sacrifice wherein many participates of one bread and one cup and thereby sealeth vp that they are all members of one mysticall bodie of Iesus Christ but not such a sacrifice wherein the people standeth gazing and looking and the Priest alone eateth and drinketh and distributeth nothing vnto the people They answere that the Priest who offereth at the Altar he communicateth with others who doe the like seruice in other places This is but falsehoode in reasoning arising vpon the deceitfull handeling of one worde hauing two significations The worde Communion importeth two things First a Communion in religion Secondly a participation of the Holy Supper in one place and an eating of one bread and drinking of one cuppe and in this second sense it is taken by the Apostle in the 10. Chapter of his first Epistle to the Corinthians in which sense their priuate Masse cannot be called a Communion The second word of the definition of the Masse is propitiatorie This word doeth signifie a sacrifice purchasing remission of sinnes as the Apostle witnesseth And this honour doeth onelie appertaine to the sacrifice of Christ who
chap. 8. vers 3. For euerie high Priest is appointed to offer giftes and sacrifices wherefore it is necessarie that this man haue somewhat also to offer What is in this place that countenanceth the sacrifice of the Masse Like as euerie priest was furnished with an offering euen so the High priest and Bisshop of our soules CHRISTIESVS hee had an offering to wit his blessed bodie which hee offered for our sinnes But papists referre this place to an offering which euerie priest must offer presently so long as hee enjoyeth the honour of his priesthood and therefore saye they seeing CHRIST offereth no externall sacrifice in Heauen he must doe it in earth by the sacrifice of the Masse But the verie Grammer refuteth them for the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a worde of the preterit and not of the present tense and importeth that CHRIST hath alreadie offered a sacrifice for our sinnes which hath no neede to bee iterated because it hath perpetuall vertue to saue them that beleeue Another place of the Epistle to the Hebrewes chap. 13. vers 10. they abuse wherein it is saide Wee haue an altar whereof they haue no power to eat who serue in the tabernacle Here say they mention is made of an altar therfore in the Church there must not only bee a Communion table but also an altar in a proper sense to offer CHRISTES bodie vpon it To this I answere That in the newe Testament like as there is but one high priest and one propitiatorie sacrifice so in like manner there is but one altar euen Iesus Christ who is in Heauen and in whom our spirituall sacrifices are acceptable vnto God as the Apostle Peter saieth Bee you made a spirituall house an holie priesthoode to offer spirituall sacrifices acceptable vnto God by Iesus Christ. 1. Pet. chap. 2. vers 5. Of this Altar to wit Christ the Iewes who were miserablie addicted to the ceremoniall lawe they could not be partakers for by adhering to shaddowes they neglected to embrace the veritie represented by those shaddowes after it was indeede exhibited vnto the worlde In the booke of the Reuelation wee reade of an Altar in Heauen vnder which the soules of them who were slaine for the worde of GOD doe repose Apocal. chap. 6. vers 9. This is not a materiall altar because it is in Heauen but this Altar is Christ vnder whose shaddow the soules of the Godlie finde comfortable refreshment And Ireneus in expresse wordes saieth Est ergo Altare in Coelis illue enim preces nostrae diriguntur that is Therefore our Altar is in Heauen for thithertoe our prayers are directed The Romane Church woulde deceiue vs in this point as Zebul of olde deceiued Gaal the sonne of Ebed when Gaal sawe men comming from the mountaines Zebul answered The shaddowe of the mountaines seeme men vnto thee IVD CHAP. IX VERS XXXVI Euen so when holy Scripture speake of Christ the true Altar they would perswade vs that Scripture is speaking of a materiall altar such as is among them The fift absurditie of the Masse is a contradiction to it selfe In the description of the Masse there are two manifest contradictions First it is called a sacrifice propitiatorie and vnbloodie which two thinges are so opposite that they cannot consist together because the Apostle in the ninth chap. to the Hebrewes and the 22. verse saieth Without shedding of bloode there is no remission of sinnes Secondlie they saye that in the Masse the body of Christ is offered without suffering these two things also are so flatte contradictorie one to another that the Apostle continuallie joyneth suffering with offering in so much that hee saieth If Christ had offered himselfe often hee behooued also to haue suffered often Heb. chap. 9. vers 25. and 26. The sixt absurditie is a foolishe multiplication of vnprofitable ceremonies both before the Masse and in the celebration thereof with neglecting the essentiall rites of the Sacrament instituted by CHRIST himselfe such as breaking distributing eating c. for in their sacrifice that which they brake in three pieces to represent the threefolde estate of Christs bodie dead buried and risen againe from death by the ordinance of Pope Sergius the first this bread I saye which they breake they distribute not and the bread which they distribute in the Sacrament to the people they breake it not These essentiall rites beeing laide aside they haue inuented manie vnprofitable ceremonies as namelie before the celebration of the Masse Vestmentes Altars Altar-clothes Corporasses Paxes Torches and Candles and manie other preparations In the verie action and celebration of the Masse are diuerse histâ—…ionicall gestures of the Priest to lift vp his eyes and cast them downe againe to spreade abroade his handes and to close them againe to warble with his fingers to bow downe to bende vp to turne from the right hand to the left and from the left hand to the right with manie other vnnecessarie ceremonies All these they count ceremonies of signification representing viuelie the passion of CHRIST But it appertaineth vnto GOD to institute ceremonies of signification who can seale vp by them some inwarde grace in mens heartes The Church maye content themselues with ceremonies of order as the Apostle writeth in his first Epistle to the CORINTHIANS in the fourteenth chapter and fourtieth verse thereof where hee saieth Let all thinges bee done honestlie and by order The seuenth last absurditie is the vnhappie consequences of the Masse Albeit they bee manie yet at this time I reduce them to three heads First prohibition of marriage to men in spirituall offices is a consequent of the Masse for albeit in the Councell of NICE this matter was seriouslie vâ—…ged and IEROME in the furie of his disoutation against IOVINIAN speaketh not so reuerentlie of marriage as became him yet this prohibition preuailed not fullie vntill the sacrifice of the Masse was receiued and established Then it was thought meete that like as married persons for prayer and fasting I. CORINTH CHAPTER VII VERSE V. shoulde abstaine for a short time from matrimoniall fellowship In like manner these who are called to a continuall exercise of praying and sacrificing they shoulde also continuallie abstaine from the bed of marriage So that prohibition of marriage to men in spirituall offices attended the Masse as a Page doeth his master And Popes such as SIRICIVS CALIXTVS GREGORIVS the seuenth c. did vrge prohibition of marriage with no lesse vehemencie than they did the establishing of the Masse The seconde consequence of the Masse is a miserable abusing of the people of GOD because by this sacrifice for the moste part the people were bereaued of the preaching of the Worde and the ministration of the Sacramentes the verie ordinarie meanes whereby the Kingdome of GOD is builded amongst them The Worde was seldome preached and in verie vnfruitfull manner and mixed with fables and lying miracles borrowed out of legendes not worthie to bee read
It is a Nouelty because that ancient Fathers wheÌ„ they spake of Satisfaction meaned not of a satisfactioÌ„ made to God but of a satisfaction made to the Church Yea and S. Augustine calleth it Satesfactio quiasatis fiebat Ecclesiae that is because the Church was satisfied It is also a blasphemous opinion because the honour only due to the merites of Christes suffering is attributed to the worthinesse of mens satisfactions such as Fasting Praying distribution of Almes going in Pilgrimage to holie places and such like offices But the vsurpation of the least of the honoures belonging onelie to CHRIST is hornbletreason in the sight of God CHRIST is a propitiation for our sinnes saieth the Apostle 1. Ihon chap. 2. vers 2. If anie man doe imagine that hee can make a satisfaction for his owne sinnes hee is blasphemous against the sonne of God And like as Iulian the Apostate when hee suffered himselfe tò bee saluted by the Armie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Emperour CONSTANTIVS the Emperour by that one worde vnderstoode the treasonable attemptes of his aspiring minde And let vs bee perswaded in our owne heartes That incase anie man imagine that hee can satiâ—…fie for his owne sinnes hee is but a Traitor against the SONNE of GOD. THe last head of Popishe Pennance is Absolution wherein three things doe concurre to wit blasphemie vncertaintie and foolishnesse It is blasphemie to saye that any man can forgiue finnes who is not Eternall GOD Marke 2. 7. except in forme of a Messenger executing GODS commaundement in such manner as GOD hath prescribed in his holie worde It is great vncertaintie to absolue men from the guiltinesse of their faults but not from their punishment insomuch that if they bee preuented by death before they haue fulfilled the pennance enjoyned by the Priest then their soules must bee tormented in Purgatorie vntill they haue made full satisfaction for their offences Then Popishe Absolution depending vpon the vncertaintie of a mans life cannot bee a certaine thing but a miserable excrutiation of poore soules put in vaine hope of absolution and yet vncertaine whether they be absolued or not Nowe because they will needes referre the institution of the Sacrament of Pennance vnto CHRIST as the Author thereof when Hee breathed vpon His Disciples and saide Whose sinnes yee remitte they are remitted c. Ihon chapt 20. verse 23. Necessitie constraineth them to prooue two thinges out of the wordes of CHRIST which they count essentiall in the Sacrament of Pennance First that CHRIST commaunded a penitent sinner to make a particulare rehearsall of his secrete sinnes in the eare of the Priest which thing CHRIST neuer commaunded Secondlie that in the absolution of a penitent sinner CHRIST commaunded to enjoyne vnto him a satisfaction whereby hee might merite at the handes of GOD forgiuenesse for sinnes committed after Baptisme which thing CHRIST neuer commaunded yea repugneth manifestlie to the Holie Scriptures of GOD in the which it is saide With one offering hath Hee consecrated for euer them that are sanctified Hebr. chapt 10. vers 14. This is not a single and vpright dealing to referre the institution of the Sacrament of Pennance vnto CHRIST when as they cannot prooue that thinges moste essentiallie requisite in their Sacrament hath allowance from the mouth of CHRIST I compare the Romanists in their doctrine of Pennance to king Hezekias not in time of his zeale vprightnes but in time of his reproueable weaknes for hee shewed vnto the Ambassadours of the King of BABEL the house of his treasures his Siluer Golde Spices and Precious Ointmentes and all the house of his Armour The Messengers of the King of BABEL had no such commission from their Master to viewe the Treasures Riches and Armour of King HEZEKIAS but onely to present letters of congratulation for the miraculous restitution of HEZEKIAS to health and to bring vnto him a present from MERODACH BALADEN King of BABEL But HEZEKIAS King of IVDA in his reprooueable weakenesse as I haue alreadie spoken let the Ambassadoures see maine chinges which they had no commission to see to the great harme and disaduantadge of his posteritie Euen so CHRIST sent out His Apostles and their true Successours to preach the doctrine of repentance and remission of sinnes But the ROMANE Church will let the Ambassadoures of GOD see such thinges as are not contained in their commission to wit a particular confession of all secrete sinnes together with a satisfaction to GOD for sinnes committed after Baptisme of which thinges no mention is made in the written worde of GOD. Heere I leaue them delighting in their Nouelties which haue no grounde from the mouth of CHRIST nor from the doctrine of His Apostles Yea they are like vnto the frogges of the I le of SERIPHVS one of the Iles called CYCLADES in the which the Frogges sette vp their heads in the Monethes of March and Aprill but they vtter no sounding voyce as the Frogges in other places doe Euen so the ROMANE Church holdeth vp their heads as if they would prooue that CHRIST instituted this Sacrament but they faint in the probation A TREATISE Of the Sacrament of Confirmation IN the Sacrament of Confirmation there is a glorious shewe of a signe and a spirituall thing signified The outward signe is Chrisme that is Oyle mixed with some mixture of Baulme which beeing signated with the signe of the Crosse vpon the fore-head of him who is confirmed in the Name of the Father Sonne and holy Ghost they saye that with this outwarde signe is conferred the seuen-folde grace of the holy Spirit And this Sacrament they extoll aboue the Sacrament of Baptisme because the grace of God which is begunne in vs by Baptisme is perfected by the Sacrament of Confirmation Yea and a Priest or Deacon of the Church may baptize but the Sacrament of Confirmation must only bee ministrated by a Bishop Verie early did Popish bishops prouide that they shoulde not be altogether idle for they beganne to loath the office of preaching and baptizing and lest they should seeme to bee idle bellies they reserued some easie exercise to themselues to wit the making of Chrisme and anointing the people therewith To all this is added a Rhetoricall discourse That the people of Israell after they had passed thorow the redde Sea they entered into a Wildernesse in the which they had a great combate with many troubles before they could enter into their rest And in like manner after that we are baptized we haue a great fight with many aduersaries troubles before we can enter into the rest of God All this is true but what is inferred vpoÌ„ this If the Apostle Paul were our instructor hee woulde bid vs put on the complete armour of God to the ende that we might withstand spirituall wickednesse and eate the blessed bread and drinke the cuppe of blessing to the ende that beeing corroborated by the strength of the
the Sonne of the liuing God Mat. 16. Euen so whatsoeuer the men in this world speake of mariage the trumpet of God sounding in his word alloweth mariage and pronounceth a blessing vnto it Psal 128. And the Apostle saith Mariage is honourable in all persons Heb. 13. ver 4. but the honour that the Romaine church giueth to mariage calling it an holy sacrament is like vnto the purple garment wherewith the souldiers clad Christ and yet they spared not to buffet his blessed face euen so the church of Rome in one worde will call mariage an holy sacrament in another they will call it a worke of the flesh and a state vncompetent to dispensators of heauenly mysteries But let them barke against mariage as the dogs barke against the moone vntill they be wearie of barking this word standeth fast Blessed are they that feare God and walke in his wayes Psal. 128. And this is spoken of persons maried yet from my hart I like the words of CHRYSOSTOM who inculcats in our eares the word of fearing God declareth that albe it all that came to the altar without a lawfull calling had an euill successe as CORAH his retinue yet not all that came to the altar with a lawful calling had a good successe euen so euery one that goeth in vnto an harlot is accursed of God but euery one that goeth in vnto his owne wife is not blessed of God but onely he who feareth God Chrysost in epist Heb. cap. 11. homil 33. Followeth nowe in the wordes of the Apostle that men should be bold to forbid meats which God hath created to be receiued with thankesgiuing No doubt but the Apostle here setteth downe as two opposit things God man God creating blessing permitting the vse of created blessed creatures to man with thanksgiuing And on the other part arrogant fellowes starting vp correcting the wisdome of God saying albeit God hath giuen liberty to eate of such such meates with thanksgiuing yet for many causes such libertie must be restrained eating of flesh on Fryday must be as great a sin as the eating of the forbidden tree What it this but a plaine spitting in the face of God As if he who hath taught vs the way to eternall life could not also in his blessed word reach vs how to eat drinke Truely the whip is meet for the back of the foole he who will needs be wiser then God in any thing if it were but in the precepts of eating drinking he is more worthy to be scourged out of the Temple of God then the buyers sellers money changers Ioh. 2. For the buyers sellers albeit they made marchandise into a place appointed for another vse yet no vnclean beast nor fowle was brought in into the temple to be bought or sold but these miserable wretches wil make the very cleane creatures of God vncleane at their pleasure which is no lesse fault then to fetch in an vncleane beast into the Temple of God Next it is to be marked in the wordes of the Apostle to whom belongeth the vse of the creatures of God namely to the belceuers only Here the Apostle declareth that there is foolishnes as well as arrogancie in the questiō of meats It is arrogancy as we haue already spoken to be wiser thē Gods word in this mater of meates it is as great foolishnes to feare that wee shall be polluted with moderate eating of the creatures of God It is not eating of flesh that will defile vs but rather fleshly affections of an heart that is not renued by faith that defileth a man as our master Christ speaketh That thing that entreth into the mouth defileth not the man but that which commeth out of the heart Marke 7. ver 18. As if a corpulent foole sweating and blowing into an hote sommer day should take vp his staffe and beate his owne shadow yet is not his shadow the cause of his grieuance but the fatnesse of his owne belly euen so foolish men are afraid to be polluted with meates but indeede it is the foolishnes of an vnbeleeuing heart that polluteth a man It is a custome among men when they would handle a fine white linnen cloth they looke to their hands lest their foule and filthie fingers defile the cleannesse of the cloth euen so when wee meddle with the creatures of God take heede to our conscience lest it beeing polluted with infidelitie it make Gods creatures vncleane vnto vs as the Apostle speaketh Vnto the pure all things be pure but vnto them that are defiled and vnbeleeuing is nothing pure but euen the minde and conscience of them is defiled Tit. 1. ver 15. Now consider whether or not the spirit hath spoken euidently and giuen a cleare warning to the last age to beware of false teachers yet is the last age more senslesse then the first age of the world that was drowned with a flood of waters God spake not in secret but openly to NOE the righteous preacher Gen. 6. and God spake not onely by word but also in deede by the building of the Arke Heb. 11. ver 7. yet would not the first age take warning but liued in deepe securitie and was drowned with waters But the last age of the world is more benummed then the first age was In the last age the spirit speaketh euidently but men will not heare the spirit ordaineth this prediction to be written but men will not reade nor ponder nor vnderstand the forewarning of the spirit the spirit pointeth out by the finger of his word who are the deceiuers of whome we should beware to wit men who teach a doctrine of deuils forbidding mariage and meates which God hath created for the vse of man with thanksgiuing For all this threefold warning in worde in write and in particular demonstration yet the last age cannot hearken to the warnings of God because God hath determined to destroy the most part of them as he did the vncorrigible sonnes of ELI who would not hearken to the counsell of their father 1. Sam. 2. ver 25. The men of this age are like vnto a deafe ignorant and foolish fellow one commeth to him and cryeth loude but hee heareth nothing at all then he beginneth to set his minde in write but that also profiteth nothing because he cannot reade In end he beginneth to signe with his finger but he taketh no notice that way because hee is a foole and the last age of the world in not receiuing so euident so cleare a warning hath kythed deafnesse dulnesse ignorance and foolishnesse It may nowe bee objected hath the Apostle PAVL soretolde onely the hypocrisie of the Romaine Antichrist in the matter of mariage and meates and is there nothing foretold anent these ancient Heretiques specially Encratitae Manichaei who vttered and dispersed in the world a doctrine of deuils that it was a
vnderstandeth not one particulare man but the estate of an vsurped kingdome wherein likewise one succeedeth to another But now let vs see how the Romane Emperour so long as he consisted in his owne full strength did hinder the attemptes of the Antichrist First no man was admitted bishop of Rome a long time without the consent of the Emperour Secondlie inuestment of bishops by staffe and ring beeing likewise in the Emperours hands the excessiue pride of the Romane bishops euen after they were called Uniuersall Bishops was mightilie borne downe Thirdly so long as Emperours kept in their owne hand the power of conuocating Generall and Nationall Councels the bishops of Rome all this while acknowledged Romane Emperours for their soueraine lordes But when the Emperours were bereaued of all their forementioned rightes as Palinurus by storme of weather was cast out of the ship and the rudder by violence of the tempest was washen out of his handes then all things were turned vp side downe as we shall heare God willing in the subsequent words wherein he prophesieth that he who letteth should be taken out of the way that is the Romane Empire shall bee vtterly weakened so that it cannot make resistance against the Antichrist but it stoupeth vnder his might adoreth him as the Vicare of Christ who cānot erre and as a god on earth is content to be crowned by him and to make the oathe of alleadgeance to the Pope In what base estate are the Emperours of late dayes how is their golde turned into drosse and the might of their dominion into seruile subjection vnto the Antichrist as was shortly comprised in these verses ROMA tibi serui fuerant domini dominorum Seruorum serui nunc tibi sunt domini Is not the Romane Empire so farre deuested of their auncient glorie that whereas their predecessours wanted nothing of the dominion of the habitable continent knowne in their time except a little part in the East now it hath no commandement except in a little part of the West But it may bee demaunded How can the bishops of Rome be blamed as ouer-throwers of the glorie of the Romane Empire seeing it was the Saracenes who vndid the Empire of the East and the Gothes Vandales Lombardis Hunnes Auares Danes and Normandis weakened the Empire of the West To this I answere That the Bishops of Rome were like unto a lowse tooth and a wrested foote and were deceitfull friendes both to the Emperours of the East and of the West rendering vnto them euill for good Did not the Emperour Iustinian deliuer them from the tyrannie of the Gothes Did not Tiberius the second support them verie kindlie when they were sore pinched with famine and oppressed by the Lombards But what recompence rendered the bishops of Rome to the Emperours of the East when they found their estate to bee weake Euen such as the Edo◅ites rendered to Gods people in the day of their trouble of whom the Prophet speaketh Thou shouldest not once haue looked on their affliction in the day of their destruction nor haue laide handes on their substance in the day of their destruction Euen so the bishops of Rome should not so much as haue laide their hands vpon the substance of the Emperours of the East who had dealt so kindly and friendly with them Neuerthelesse the first occasion that they found to enrich themselues with the possessions of the Emperours of the East they ouer-passed it not but tooke the gift of Exarchatus Rauennae and Pentapolis in Italie which duely belonged to the Emperour of the East These dominions I say they tooke by the gift of Pipinus king of France who was prodigall in bestowing vnto the chaire of Rome other mens possessions and they possesse the dominions afore-saide with their townes villages and territories euen vntill this day On the other part Carolus Magnus Emperour of the West was friendly to the chaire of Rome and made them free of the molestation of the Lombards Notwithstanding after his death and the death of Ludouicus Pius his sonne when cruell hostilitie fell out amongst the children of Ludouicus Pius to wit Lotharius Lewes and Charles whereby the puissance of France was weakened and the Danes and Normans got the more easily place in France What was the carriage of Sergius the second bishop of Rome at this time Platina writeth that hee sent Gregorius Arch-bishop of Rauenna to reconcile these brethren who contended one against another with insupportable hatred but the tragedie of Ludouicus Pius house declared that the bishops of Rome were little grieued when the estate of Emperours houses decayed prouiding their owne estate did increase And I remit to the course of the Historie what friendship the posteritie of Carolus Magnus and his sonne Ludouicus Pius found at the hands of the bishop of Rome for all their bountifull kindnesse towardes that vnthankfull chaire Alwayes remember the wordes of Salomon Hee that ewardeth euill for good euill shall not depart from his house Prouerb 17. 13. What shall I speake of the Emperiall authoritie when it came amongst the Germanes Otto the first a worthie Emperour what fidelitie founde hee in Pope Ihonne the thirteenth whome Onuphrius calleth Ihonne the twelft Hee assisted Berengarius and his sonne Albertus against the Emperour Otto nothing regarding his oath of alleadgeance made to the contrarie And albeit euerie Emperour was not so magnanimous as Otto and euerie Pope was not so beastly as Pope Ihonne the thirteene yet when one of the best Emperours and one of the worst Popes were matched together wee may easily perceiue whereat the Popes aimed continually to wit at the vndoing of the dominion of the Emperour By the waye let vs marke diuerse affections striuing in Onuphrius as they did of olde in Medea when shee killed her owne childe to wit anger and motherly affection contended one against another in her but anger got the vpper-hand and the childe was killed Euen so in Onuphrius a desire to couer the turpitude of the Romane chaire contendeth with a necessitie to report the trueth of the Historie and trueth getteth the vpper-hand at this time and hee leaueth the defence of this vile beast The valiant courage of the Emperour Hendrie the fourth counted no lesse fortunate in warre-fare than Iulius Caesar was in olde times and the gallant spirites of Frederick the first and second could not mende this matter the curses of the Antichrist so terrified the world that they forgot their duetie to their soueraine lordes and suffered them to bee trodden vnder the feete of the Antichrist In the 8. verse followeth the prophesie of the discouerie and destruction of the Antichrist concerning his discouerie three thinges are to bee considered First who shall bee discouered Secondly when shall hee be discouered and thirdly the mean◅s of his discouerie The Antichrist is hee who shall bee discouered to whome the Apostle attributeth a new name and calleth him that wicked man Is he not pointed out already with
is a propitiation for our sinnes the sinnes of the whole world This ground being once laide that Christ is the only person in whom the Father is well pleased with vs and Christes sacrifice is the onely meanes whereby we are reconciled to God In the second place we shall consider wherefore the word of propitiation was in so frequent vse in the olde Testament The golden coucring of the Arke was called the propitiatorie likewise the tenth day of the seuenth moneth whereupon the High Priest entered once in the yeere within the Vaile and into the most Holy place it was called the daye of propitiation and the sinne-offeringes were called propitiatorie sacrifices To this doubt the Apostle answereth that the lawe hauing the shadowe of good thinges to come and not the verie image of the thinges can neuer with those sacrifices which they offer yeere by yeere continuallie sanctifie the commers thereunto By these wordes it is euident that the sinne-offering and the blood carried within the Vaile and the golden couering of the Arke had no power to purge the consciences of men from sinne onelie they were types and figures representing Christ in whome that was to bee actuallie performed which was represented by those figures And like as no prefiguration sacrifice in a proper sense could be called propitiatorie Euen so in like manner no commemoratiue sacrifice of Christes death can bee called a propitiatorie sacrifice except typically and figuratiuely The wordes of Augustine speaking of the sacrament of the Altar in the celebration whereof there was a commemoration of the names of manie men who were departed this life presenteth to Papistes some occasion of cauillation for they saye that Augustine thought the sacrament of the Altar to bee a propitiation for men who had beene of a middle-ranke that is neither of the best nor of the worst sort of people But they who are well acquainted with Augustines writinges will not bee easilie miscaried with such Amphthologies as lurke in wordes True it is that AVGVSTINE calleth the Sacrament a Sacrifice but in what sense A commemoratiue Sacrifice as hath beene declared alreadie And in the like sense hee calleth the Sacrament of the Altar propitiatio because in it there is a commemoration of the propitiatorie sacrifice which CHRIST offered vpon the Crosse. His distinction of men who are departed in three rankes some haue beene verie good men others haue beene verie badde men the third ranke haue neither bene the best nor the worst sort of people together with his doubtsome opinion cōcerning the estate of weake Christians who are departed this life presenteth no solide grounde to any man to build his argument vpon the testimonie of a doubting author The next worde of the definition is vnbloodie Howe repugnant this part of the definition is vnto the former part wherein it was called a propitiatorie Sacrifice GOD willing I shall declare in the last head concerning the absurdities of the Masse For one speciall respect Papistes shoulde speake sparinglie of their vnbloodie hostie for they haue made it bloodie by the cruell shedding of the blood of manie innocent people whome they haue persecuted to the death massacred tormented with formes of newe inuented crueltie circumueened by false and deceitfull promises and they haue excogitated horrible treasons the like whereof haue not beene hearde since the foundation of the worlde and these villanies were hatched in their hatefull heartes for the establishing of their Idolatrous Masse Vesperae siculae maye bee called an vnbloodie Euen-song and the sacrifices offered to DIANA in TAVRICA CHERSONESVS maye bee called vnbloodie sacrifices with better reason than the Popishe Masse can bee called an vnbloodie sacrifice because the seruice done to DIANA albeit it beganne with the shedding of humane bloode yet it ended with the shedding of the bloode of beastes But the crueltie of the Papistes will make no such exchange because they walke in the way of Cain The next part of the definition is this That in the Masse the Priest offereth the bodie of the Sonne of GOD to the Father No part of the definition is more vntollerable and more flatlie opposite to holie Sripture than this part for holie Scripture setteth downe CHRISTES bodie as the onelie propitiatorie sacrifice and CHRIST himselfe as the onelie High Priest who offered this sacrifice And to transferre this high honour onelie due to CHRIST vnto a sinfull man it is a thing vntollerable to true Christians who are affectioned to the glorie of IESVS CHRIST their Master and Sauiour But incase a mortall and sinfull man will take vpon him such boldnesse as to offer the bodie of the Sonne of GOD in a sacrifice to the Father let vs consider by what warrande of the calling of GOD dare hee presume so to doe Papists affirme that when CHRIST instituted the holie Supper at one and the selfe same time hee instituted both a Sacrament and a Sacrifice and consecrated his Apostles and their successours to bee Priestes of the newe Testament to offer vp the bodie of Christ vnto His FATHER vnder the formes of Bread and Wine and these were the wordes whereby they were consecrated to this Priesthood Doe this in remembrance of mee The Apostle Paule vnderstood the meaning of the words of Christ better than the whole Councell of Trent did and he expoundeth these wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Doe this referring them both to Pastors and people To Pastors when he saith That which I deliuered vnto you I receiued of the Lord to people when he saith As ost as yee drinke drinke it in remembrance of me Then the Pastors do this when they minister the Sacramēt expressely according to the institution of Christ and the people doe this when they eate and drinke at the Lordes Table in remembrance of the Lords death But the Apostle Paul doeth not expound the wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Councell of Trent hath done More-ouer if CHRIST in these wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Doe this hee ordained his disciples to be Priests of the new Testament and to offer in sacrifice the bodie of Christ to his Father then Christ when hee ministred the holy Supper hee offered himselfe in a sacrifice to the Father for hee biddeth them doe that same thing which hee did and consequently hee offered himselfe at two diuerse times and behoued to suffer twise as the Apostle testifieth which is an absurd thing once to thinke such a thing Further I maye boldly affirme that the Leuiticall sacrifices were not so farre different from the sacrifice of Christ as the Masse is different from it The Leuiticall sacrifices differed in manie thinges from the sacrifice of Christ as namely in the order of priesthoode in the worthinesse of the Priest in the excellencie of the sacrifice in the preciousnesse of the Tabernacle in the glorie of the Vaile and moste Holy place and finally in the vertue