distinction of veniall and mortall sinnes Prou. 24. 16. A iust man falleth seuentimes and riseth vp againe Ergo Men may commit sinnes veniall and yet remaine iust Answ Here is no proofe that these falls or sinnes are not mortall in themselues For that a iust man sinning remaineth iust is not from the nature of the sinnes which he doth fall into but from the state of adoption and Gods mercy which giueth him grace to repent which is here to bee vnderstood by his rising againe God accepting of him in Christ through whom he is accounted iust and in whom all his sinnes are veniall XXXI Proposition Of keeping Gods Commandements THe question is not of man before his fall for he could then The state of the question keepe them nor of man in corrupt estate for hee cannot keepe them being altogether wicked and euill as before is proued nor of man in state of glory being in all perfection and able perfectly to doe the will of God But the question is of man regenerate in the state of grace as he here liueth going on by Gods assisting grace vnto the perfection in glory Neither is the question here of any kinde of keeping for the regenerate man in diuers respects may bee said to keepe Gods commandements First Imputatiuely in Retract lib. 2. cap. 19. Christ who is our Wisedome Righteousnesse Sanctification and Redemption and through whom we are pardoned To this fitteth that of Saint Austin All the commandements are then reputed done when that is for giuen which is left vndone Secondly in respect of his will God hauing giuen him a will and hearty desire in sinceritie to keepe his commandements and then in his mercy accepting the same will for the deed Thirdly in respect of his endeuour and carefull striuing in all good conscience to frame his life after these commandements so keeping them according to the measure of his grace receiued Fourthly comparatiuely in respect of others who liue loosely without care and conscience of obedience A godly gracious person in respect of such may be said to keepe the commandements Lastly in respect of his integritie of heart to one commandement as well as to another and to all and euery clause of euery commandement at all times without sinister regard according to his knowledge and power of diuine grace giuen to assist him therein Of such kinds of keeping is not the question but it is this That a regenerate man by assistance of Gods grace is able to obserue all and euery commandement of God in euery part at all times in thought word and deed perfectly as God in his Law requireth of him Confuted by their owne Bible 1. IT maketh all to haue sinne in them 1. Ioh. 1. 8 10. If we say Prou. 20. 9. we haue no sinne we deceiue our selues If we say we haue no sinne we make him a lyer Now here in the word wee is vnderstood Saint Iohn the beloued Apostle as well as others So Iames saith In many things we offend Iam. 3. 2. and Where sinne is there is the transgression of the Law 1. Ioh. 3. 4. And they that sinne keepe not perfectly the Law II. It maketh iust men imperfect and offenders against the Law Eccles 7. 21. There is no iust man in the earth that doth good and sinneth not Prou. 24. 16. Seuen times shall the iust fall and rise againe This they themselues expound of sinne that a iust man sinneth oftentimes III. It affordeth vs a world of examples of most excellent men which haue offended and greatly transgressed the Law of God Adam made in perfection iust Noah holy Aaron righteous Iob zealous Dauid Ieremie the Prophet Saint Peter and other the Apostles also when they forsooke Christ IV. It bringeth in Saint Paul who was an Apostle who had beene rapt into the third heauen bewayling himselfe calling himselfe an vnhapppy man because of that sinne which yet remained in him which made him to doe the euill which hee would not and hindred him in doing the good which hee would doe and so repugning the Law of his minde and captiuing him in the Law of sinne which is in his members Rom. 7. 19 24. In like manner Iob cap. 9. 28 31. fearing all his workes for though hee should be washed yet saith he speaking of God Thou shalt dip me in filth and my garments shall abhorre me Lastly it teacheth the forme of the Lords Prayer wherein wee all and euery one are taught to aske dayly forgiuenesse of God which sheweth that wee all trespasse dayly against him Contraried by Antiquitie Ambros in Comment on Gal. 3. The commandements are such as it is vnpossible to keepe them Austin in Confess lib. 9. cap. 13. Woe be to the most commendable life that we can leade if thou Lord setting thy mercie aside shouldest examine it Bernard on Cant. Serm. 50. The commandements neither haue beene fulfilled in this life by any man nor can be And afterwards he saith that the Law exceedeth mans strength and acknowledgeth that God commanded things impossible not to make vs sinners but to humble vs. Gainesaid by their owne selues Doway in Annot. on Prou. 24. 15 16. saith that without imperfections no man liueth Rhemists on Matth. 6. 12. doe acknowledge that euery man though hee be neuer so iust liueth not without veniall sinnes Now hauing proued before that all sinne in its nature is mortall Therefore by this their grant all men sinne mortally when they sinne if that there were not remission through Christ Ferus in Act. 15. The Law is an impossible burthen for it requireth not onely the hand but the heart Secondly it conuinceth vs to bee sinners for wee doe all more against it then for it Aquinas saith in Gal. 3. lect 4. It is impossible to fulfill the whole Law and citeth for it Act. 15. 10. Scriptures obiected answered Phil. 4. 3. I can doe all things through Christ which strengthneth me Answ 1. All things must of necessitie be limited for Paul could not doe all things without exception Secondly they are to bee applyed to the all things which hee before spake of in the former verse that is to bee abased and to abound In all things saith he I am instructed both to be full and to be hungry both to abound and to suffer need Here we see the Apostle limits his all things to these kinde of things Thirdly herein cannot bee included the commandements for that the Apostle should here contradict himselfe For in Rom. 7. 18 19 20. speaking of the Law he professeth his inabilitie to performe that which is good Fourthly let it be granted that here the commandements are included as they would yet perfect obedience will not bee hence included For its one thing to be a doer and another thing to doe all in perfection A man may say hee is to doe and can doe all his Masters businesse Will it therfore follow that he so doth it as no defect euer at any time
fire from heauen Leuit. 10. 1 5. Vzzah of a good intent but touching the Arke was striken dead of God 2. Sam. 6. 7. The Bethshemites for but looking into the Arke were smitten dead to the number of aboue fifty thousand 1. Sam. 6. 19. The Israelites slaine in the Wildernesse 1. Cor. 10. For vnaduisedly speaking yea when it came from a vexed and exasperated spirit was Moses punished Psal 105. 32 33. he was not permitted to goe into Canaan which was a type of Heauen but hee must dye before euen Moses Now whatsoeuer sinne vnder the Law God punished with death or commanded to be punished by death the same without remission deserued eternall death For the first time that death is mentioned it is to bee vnderstood of death temporall and eternall due to all had not there beene a Mediatour betweene God and vs Gen. 2. 17. Fourthly it teacheth that Originall sinne which is lesse then any actuall sinne whether in thought word or deed is punished with death Rom. 5. 12. Now if the reward of this sinne be death then surely much more any other flowing from thence though it seeme to man neuer so small an offence deserueth death as the very consent of the minde to other euill doers among which boasters are reckoned is worthy of death Rom. 1. 32. yea and Commessations which we translate Reuellings wherein too many much delight is a sinne which keepes the doers thereof that they cannot obtaine the Kingdome of God Gal. 5. 21. Fifthly sinnes of ignorance vnder the law Leuit. 4. 2 13 27. had sacrifices appointed to make an atonement to God for them Now all sacrifices for sinne shewed that a man deserued death for euery such sinne Now if sinnes of ignorance deserue death what may all men think of such sins as Papists call veniall before-mentioned plainely forbidden by the Word of God Sixtly to commit adulterie is a mortall sinne but their Bible telleth vs that for one to see a woman to lust after her hath al-already committed adulterie with her in his heart Matth. 5. 28. And can any sinne seeme lesse then concupiscence of the heart suddenly arising by the obiect to the sight And yet Papists make wanton dalliances no sinne or as none in their account Seuenthly it sheweth that it is Christs bloud that cleanseth from all sinne 1. Ioh. 1. Now if euery sinne needs cleansing by his bloud then euery sinne in its owne nature is mortall in that it cannot be cleansed but by his death Contraried by Antiquitie Austin in Enchirid. cap. 79. speaking of sinnes which might seeme small saith They might bee thought very light but that in the Scriptures they are demonstrated greater then wee doe imagine But that the truth speakes it who would thinke saith hee that for a man to call his Brother foole is guiltie of hell-fire The ancient Fathers earnestly exhort to beware of counting any sinnes light or small Basil qu. Contract qu. 4. No sinne is to bee accounted as small for that saith hee it is the sting of death See for this Austin Epist 108. and in Ioh. 11. 13. Chrysost on Gal. 1. Ierome in Epist ad Caelantiam It is very safe to beware of small sinnes as if they were great c. Neither doe I know saith he whether we may call any sinne small seeing it is committed with a kinde of contempt of God And he is most prudent who respects not so much the quantitie of the thing commanded as the dignitie of the Commander See Master Perkins his Demonst of his Probl. of veniall sin and therein many testimonies of the Ancients Gainsaid by their owne men Almaine out of Gerson Moral Tract 3. cap. 20. concludeth that no sinne is veniall of it selfe but onely through the mercy of God Azorius instit Moral part 1. lib. 4. cap. 8. doth maintaine against Bellarmine that veniall sinnes are against the Law Now that which is against the Law is deadly Of this opinion is Fisher Bishop of Rochester and diuers others See the Authors in Doctor Whites Way digres 38. pag. 247. and Bishop Mortons Protest Appeal pag. 646. To passe ouer the oppositions of one against another they all call them sinnes Now euery sinne is the transgression of the Law 1. Ioh. 3. 4. By which we come to the knowledge of sinne Rom. 3. 26. and 7. 7. And if there were no Law there were no transgression Rom. 4. 15. Therefore in confessing veniall sinnes to be sinnes they make them transgressions of the Law and then the Law worketh wrath Rom. 4. 15. and so necessarily through veniall sinnes they are vnder wrath and so sinne mortally euen to condemnation except God in Christ pardon them and that they doe heartily repent pray for pardon and seeke with God reconciliation by Christ Scriptures obiected answered Matth. 5. 25. Whosoeuer is angry with his brother without cause is in danger of Iudgement And whosoeuer shall say vnto his Brother Racha shall be in danger of Councill and whosoeuer shall say Thou Foole shall be guilty of Hell-fire Answ This place proueth not any sinnes to be veniall and not mortall in their owne nature For first this should be against the scope of Christs speech in confuting the Pharises mis-vnderstanding the Law and here in particular the sixt commandement They stucke to the Letter Christ here extendeth the breach of this Law to thoughts and words so making a man by causelesse anger and railing words to be before God guiltie of murder Is this then to make sinne veniall or are not rather those which they conceit to bee veniall by Christ here made mortall if to be guilty of bloud before God be mortall Secondly here is no difference made of sinnes in their nature but onely here is shewed the degrees of sinning and that one offence is greater then another For faine would I know of them how they can distinguish these in nature that anger and calling one Racha should be veniall and to call one Foole to bee mortall Thirdly the punishments here expressed distinguish not the nature of the sinnes but shew the degrees of punishments according as men sinne For as God in mercy will reward mens well-doings with degrees of glory so in iustice will he in hell the damned with degrees of punishment Matth. 10. 15. Fourthly whereas our Aduersaries make Iudgement and Councill temporall punishments for veniall sinnes and hell fire for mortall sinnes taking aduantage by the translation of the word Gehenna First it is cleere that punishments doe not alter the nature of sinnes but being duely executed doe shew onely the degrees of sinne to be greater or lesser and so are they accordingly punished Secondly Papists themselues hold vnaduised anger and words euen tending to blasphemie comming of sudden and vnaduised anger as the word Racha and Foole doe here to be veniall sinnes Therefore they erre in distinguishing the sinnes thus into veniall and mortall which they themselues account to be veniall Thirdly the punishments here mentioned are such
as either concerne the ciuill Magistrate to inflict temporally here or such meant as God will inflict eternally in another world but these are not punishable by the Magistrate in these cases for we finde not in Scripture any Law of Moses for Magistrates to call men into iudgement for vnaduised anger or to a Councill or to burne men for calling one Racha or Foole proceeding no further Therefore the punishments are meant such as God will inflict eternally in the life to come If so then I answer Fourthly that Iudgement Councill and hell fire are the degrees of Gods punishment vpon the wicked in hell Fifthly and lastly whereas by the translation hell fire is giuen to the third and not to the other two they would by the other vnderstand onely temporall punishments and by this eternall they are greatly deceiued or would deceiue or do both First for that these kinds of sinnes here expressed will not admit this distinction there being no such great difference betweene the sinnes as that the former should deserue but onely temporal punishments in this world or as they dreame in Purgatory and the other eternall in hell Secondly because the words in all the punishments are first to be conceiued and taken according to the proceeding after the accustomed forme of ciuill iudgements among the Iewes for some punishment was inflicted according to the sentence of the lowest Court here vnderstood by iudgement like to our petty Sessions Some according to the sentence of a higher Court their Sanhedrin consisting of three and twenty Elders like to our Quarter Sessions and some according to the sentence of the highest Court the great Councill at Ierusalem consisting of seuentie Elders like to our great Assizes whose sentence was inflicted vpon the presumptuous and greatest offendors Deut. 17. 12. worthy of the place named Gehenna which was also called Topheth in the valley of the children of Hinnom in the Suburbs of Ierusalem where Idolaters made their children to passe thorow the fire to the Idol Molech 2. King 23. 10. 2. Chron. 28. 3. Ier. 7. 31 32. which places Iosias defiled with filth in detestation thereof and became to be for such execrable Idolatry most accursed and so detestable as that for such as were worthy the greatest torments Topheth was said to bee prepared Esai 30. 33. Whereupon it came to be at length taken for Hell fire the place of the damned as here in Matth. 5. 29 30. and 10. 28. and 18. 9. and 23. 25 33. Iam. 3. 6. but here first taken properly as the other two are before and then applyed vnto Gods inflicting punishment as if it had been said As you Iewes here in your countrey doe make difference of offences and so haue differing degrees of punishing with death according to your seuerall Courts So after this life God accordingly in Hell hath degrees of punishment for differing sinnes which here men doe commit Thus standeth the similitude Else it were absurd as Papists make it to be partly of temporall and partly of eternall punishment for as there bee three degrees of sinne bad worse and worst of all and three degrees of punishment with death by hanging stoning and burning first by iudgement which is great then by Councill which is greater and lastly by highest Court as with Gehenna the greatest of all so is it with God in punishing the wicked with seuerall degrees of punishments after death Matth. 23. 24. Blinde guides that straine at a Gnat and swallow a Cammell Here is sinne compared one to a Gnat and another to a Cammell so in Luk. 6. 41. one to a moate and another to a beame Answ The places shew that all sinnes are not equall but some farre greater then other-some which we beleeue teach But they proue not that therefore some onely deserue eternall death and the other only temporall and not eternall For all sin bee it as a Gnat or a moate deserues in it owne nature death eternall as well as the sinne which is as a Cammell or as a Beame as before is proued Luk. 12. 59. Thou shalt not goe out thence till thou hast paid the very last mite This mite is veniall sinne say they Answ 1. The place is allegorically interpreted and therefore from the bare words is no sound proofe Secondly the absurditie and falshood of such an exposition is before confuted out of Matth. 5. 25 26. where it is alledged for Purgatorie in which place onely veniall sinnes are payed for compared to farthings and mites But what is this last mite a mite of Is it of a summe which consists all of mites or else of other moneys and of greater summes To affirme it a summe of all mites were but an idle dreame and if it consists of greater summes then is the party cast into prison for these also Then the Allegorie vrged to maintaine Purgatorie makes it a place to satisfie both for mortall and veniall sinnes which our Aduersaries deny 1. Cor. 3. 12. Where by Wood Hay and Stubble are meant veniall sinnes Answ 1. It hath beene alledged before for Purgatorie and there answered at full But here yet further I answer Secondly that the Apostle speaketh here of vnwholsome and vnprofitable Doctrines And are these veniall sinnes Is errour in Doctrine not a sinne in its owne nature Is it not worthy of death to mis-lead by impure preaching and to breed errours in mens minds He is cursed with Amen that makes the blind goe out Deut. 27. 18. of their way Iam. 7. 14. Euery one is tempted of his owne concupiscence drawne and enticed then when lust hath conceiued it bringeth forth sinne and sinne when it is finished bringeth forth death Where they make some motions no sinnes some sinnes but not deadly and other-some deadly Answ Here is no distinction of sinnes in their natures but a genealogie of sinne from the mother concupiscence and the deserued reward thereof in the end which is death Here is no veniall sinne For first death is due to the mother lust which lust is sinne Rom. 7. and worthy of death Rom. 5. Secondly he speakes here of sinne singularly the fruit of lust conceiued brought forth and ripened as of one and the same sinne growing to the full height and not of diuers kinds of sinnes differing in nature Thirdly when Iames saith that lust brings forth sinne it is not by calling the fruit thereof sinne to cleere lust from being sinne for Saint Paul calleth it sinne Rom. 7. and what is it that naturally brings forth sinne that in it selfe is not sinne but it is to distinguish naturall corruption from actuall transgression Fourthly death is put in the last place for sinne consummate and not that lust is not worthy of death nor the sinne which floweth thence but to shew whereto our owne corrupt nature drawne and entised will at length bring vs by sinning euen vnto death if it bee not mortified And therefore this text is nothing for the proofe of their vntrue
come to them and blesse them Chap. 20. 24. to be high aboue all Nations to praise name and honour to be a holy people Deut. 26. 19. to circumcise their heart and the heart of their seed to loue him with all their heart and soule Deut. 30. 6. to be with them not to leaue them nor forsake them Deut. 31. 8. yea he promised that no new god should be among Psal 81. 9. them nor they to adore a strange god Psal 80. 10. Mount Sion was not to be remoued but to abide for euer and peace to be on Israel Psal 105. 1. whom he would redeeme from all Psal 1â—â— 1. Psal 13â— 8. Psal 132. 13 14 iniquities Psal 129. 8. He chose Sion and that to be his rest for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Psal 13â— 13 14. their way was to be the way of Holinesse and so direct that fooles should not erre by it Esay 35. 8. and such as erred in the Spirit should know vnderstanding the mutterer should learne the Law Esa 29 24. and they should haue Pastors according to the Lords owne heart which should feed them with knowledge and doctrine Ier. 3. 15. To conclude Israel had a promise to be saued with eternall saluation they should not be confounded and ashamed for euer and euer Esay 45. 17. yea that we may know that the promises were not to the people then liuing onely the Lord saith I will powre out my Spirit vpon their seede and my blessing vpon thy stocke Esay 44. 3. and touching the Temple thus saith God to Salomon I haue sanctified this House to put my Name there for euer and mine eyes and my heart shall be there 1. King 9. 3. alwayes 3. Kin. 9. 3. Yet for all these so gracious promises she erred she hath fallen away and remaineth in her sinnes We haue heard out of their owne Bible First how the Churches defection hath beene foretold Secondly how she also hath beene found guiltie Thirdly the same proued by Historie of the Bible from the beginning in Adam and Eue till Christ though the Church of Israel had admirable meanes to vphold it to which I do adde this last From Christs comming till Iohns being in Pathmos In this space we may finde errours in the Church The Apostles themselues before Christs Ascension were in an error touching Christ his Kingdome dreaming of a temporall kingdome Act. 1. 6. Luk. 24. 21. of restoring the kingdome to Israel and redeeming them so as they did striue among themselues which of them should be greatest Luk 22. 24. and hereupon it was that the mother of Zebedees children desired of him for her sonnes that one might sit in his Kingdome on the right hand and the other on the left Mat. 20. 20 21. Their knowledge was very imperfect for it is said often that they vnderstood not many things Mat 15. 16. Luk. 9. 45. and 10. 34. Ioh. 12. 16. and 29. yea so slow of heart and dull of hearing they were that Christ telleth them that he had many things to say to them but that then they were not able to beare theÌ„ Ioh. 16. 12. their faith was verie weake as appeareth by his calling of them Ye of little faith Mat. 8. 26 and 16. 8. Slow of heart to beleeue what the Prophets had spoken Luk. 24. 25. Also by their forsaking him and flying from him when he was taken Mat. 26 56. After Christs Ascension and the comming downe of the holy Ghost they were ignorant for a time in this that they did not thinke it was lawfull to go to the Gentiles as we may see in Peter Act. 10 15. 20. and the other Iewes vers 45. compared with Cap. 11. 2 3 18 19. The Churches of Galatia erred so as S. Paul said that he feared lest hee had laboured in vaine Gal. 4. 11. I neede not here speake of errors and Heresies creeping in troubling the Church and deceiuing many as in Act. 15. 2. 1. Tim 1. 3 6 7 19. 20. 2. Tim 2. 18 19. 1. Cor. 15. 12. Ephesus fell from her first loue Reu. 2. 4 Pergamus had in her such as vpheld the doctrine of Balaam and of the Nicolaitans Reu. 2 14. Thyatira tolerated Iezabel to reach and seduce Christs seruants Reu. 2. 20. Sardis was an hypocriticall Church and in a dying condition and Laodicea luke-warme rich in conceit but miserable naked blinde and poore in condition Reu. 3. 2 16 17. S. Paul telleth Timothy that all that were in Asia were departed from him 2. Tim. 1. 15. Thus was the Churches state euen in the Apostles dayes By which we may see the Church subiect to erre and to hold the contrary that she cannot erre Antiquitie is against Contraried by Antiquitie Origen Hom. 6. in Ezek. The Citie of God as long as she erreth not or doth not sinne hath God to her Father but when she beginneth to erre her father is an Amorite and her mother an Hittite he then thought she might erre Ierome complaineth in Dialog aduers Lucifer That the whole world groaned and wondered to see it selfe Arian Did not he thinke then that the Church might erre Aug. lib. 2. cap 18. Retract speaking of the Church on earth saith that by reason of ignorance and infirmities of her members the whole Church hath cause to say euery day Forgiue vs our trespasses Basil epist 70. telleth vs that Satan had in his time begun to sow the seedes of Apostasie in those places where the Gospell of the Kingdome first arose vp striuing to spread it into the whole World He speakes of Apostasie which is more then erring What meant Hilarie cont Auxentium when he said The Church is lost and wee are fallen into the time of Antichrist whose ministers do transforme themselues into Angels of light without all feeling or conscience of Christ Vincent Lvren aduers profan Nou. ca. 4. hath said that not only some portion of the Church but the whole Church it selfe is blotted with some new contagion Gainesaid by some of their owne Pope Innocent saith in the Canon Law The Churches Iudgement Decret Greg. li. 3. de sent excom ca. 28. A nobis est saepe Super 5. de sent excom Anobis 2. oftentimes followeth opinion which many times falleth out both to deceiue vs and to be deceiued it selfe Panormitan thus writeth A generall Councell representing the whole Church may erre in excommunicating him that should not bee excommunicate If in a matter of this nature where proofes may bee brought before sentence pronounced how much more in points of a higher nature without the Scripture for the guide A generall Councell is called the whole Church representadue If therfore this erre theÌ„ may the Church erre for how can the Churches voyce else be heard except in Can. 6. the Scriptures But by their owne confession generall Councels haue erred for the first Councell at Nice of 318. Bishops made the Bishop of Romes gouernment no more then that of Alexandria That at Ephesus of 200.
adding thereto three Epistles 11. He was the onely Apostle that was rapt in Spirit on the Lords day to receiue the Reuelation of Iesus Christ by an Angell foretelling the Churches estate to the worlds end 12. Lastly hee was of all the rest that liued the longest and alone after them all In these was hee farre beyond Peter He neuer denied his Master as Peter did Hee was neuer called Satan as Peter was Yet for all these excellencies in Iohn the Papists will not haue any Chiefty in him And surely if these eminencies wil not afford him the Headship among them it cannot be found in Peter who attained not to such excellencies Contraried by Antiquitie Cyprian de vnitat Eccles Verily the rest of the Apostles were the same that Peter was endued with equall fellowship both of honour and authoritie Ierome aduers Iouin lib. 1. All the Apostles receiued the Keyes of the Kingdome of Heauen and the strength of the Church was established equally vpon them all Origen on Math. 16. tract 1. saith of the Keyes that they were not giuen to Peter alone but to all alike and that which Christ said was spoken in common to them all Ambrose de incarnat cap. 4. saith that Peter receiued the Primacie of confession not of honour the primacie of Faith not of Degree Rabanus Maurus de institut Clericorum lib. 1. cap. 4. saith That the rest of the Apostles were fellowlike with Peter in Honour and Authoritie Gainesaid by some of their owne side Aquinas id opuse 20. calleth all the Apostles the Vicars of Christ Cusanus lib. 1. de concord Cathol cap. 13. Wee know that S. Peter hath not receiued more authoritie of Christ then the rest of the Apostles In the Masse they singing to Christ pray that he would keepe his flocke by the holy Apostles who are there called Vicars of his worke Gratian dist 21. in Nouo 24. 4. c. loquitur Nothing was said to Peter that was not said to the rest of the other Apostles who according to S. Ierome are all the Fundamentall stones of the Church Reuel 21. Leo first Bishop of Rome in Aniuers die assump suae ad Pontificatum Ser. 3. saith I giue thee the Keyes was a power transferred to all the Apostles Scriptures obiected answered Mat. 10. 20. Now the names of the twelue Apostles are these the first Simon who is called Peter c. Because he is first named therefore they will conclude a Headship ouer the rest Answ Here is no expresse word of Headship but in numbering the Twelue the first beginneth with Peter So he is onely first here in reckoning in order of numbring but not of commanding superioritie Saint Marke chap. 3. 16. Luke 6. 14. leaue out the word first in naming of the Apostles And Saint Paul in naming the Apostles with Peter giueth him not the first place Gal. 2. 9. He is first reckoned for that hee was first called by Christ Mat. 4. 18. Andrew knew Christ before him and Ioh. 1. 41 42. brought him to Christ but when Christ called them to follow him and to be his Disciples Peter is first in that place of Matthew For when Andrew brought him to Christ neither of them were as yet called by him to follow him for that was not till Iohn the Baptist was imprisoned Andrew was Iohns Disciple and his knowing of Christ was this by Iohns teaching Ioh. 1. 35 36 40. and he brought Peter to Christ vers 41 42. but Andrew abode with Christ but that day verse 39. neither did hee as yet leaue his Master Iohn but when Iohn was imprisoned both Andrew and Peter returned to their calling Mar. 1. 14 16. In which vocation Christ found them and then called them and the first of them was Simon Math. 4. 18. And hereupon being first named when he was called and the first called of all the Cyprian Ep 71. ad Quint. Greg. in Ezech. hom 18. are of this iudgement that Peter was first called Apostles by Mathews relation chap. 4. he is in the reckoning of the 12. first named by him in chap. 10. 21. and so by the other Euangelists For it is the Rhemists errour to say that Andrew was first called and a common mistake to yeeld them so much whereby they seeme to take more hold from this place and from the rest where Peter is first named then there is iust cause although the argument is of it selfe very weake as by the former Reasons is euident and as before hath beene proued For Reuben was first in the numbring but Iudah for all that was chiefe in gouernment Math. 16. 19. I will giue vnto thee the Keyes c. The Gagger will haue Peter chiefe for that he supposeth the Keyes were giuen to him onely Answ 1. The question which Christ propounded was to all the Apostles verse 13. 15. though Peter readiest euer to speake made the answer yet not onely for himselfe but for all the rest as appeareth in verse 20 where our Sauiour commandeth them all not Peter alone not to tell that he was Christ which sheweth that they all knowing it would haue professed as much if Peter had not preuented them Therefore his answer beeing for all Christs power giuen thereupon was generall to all Secondly the Keyes giuen are no such things as belong onely to Peter but are common to all See before an answer to this place Thirdly the words following in this Text Whatsoeuer thou shalt binde vpon earth c. containing the action or office of the Keyes belong to all Math. 18. 18. which power here was giuen not onely to Peter but also to the other Apostles by the Rhemists owne confession Fourthly Iesus Christ when hee breathed on them the Holy Ghost Ioh. 21. 22 23. which with one bredth he gaue to all saying As my Father sent me so I send you and gaue them all power of forgiuing and retaining of sinnes which is the power of the Keyes here spoken of Christ sent all his Apostles as his Father sent him Therefore Peter cannot haue more authoritie then the rest vnlesse they can proue that Peter was sent by Christ otherwise then Christ himselfe was sent by his Father Fiftly the words are a promise of giuing the Keyes and power to bind and loose to remit and retain sinnes afterwards and not the giuing of them now but this promise wee see was not performed to Peter alone but to all the Apostles Ioh. 20. 23. not then naming Peter and therefore this promise was made vnto all and so intended to be performed as the fulfilling sheweth Lastly the Fathers are of the same opinion with vs touching the meaning of this Text See before Origen Ambrose and the same on Psal 39. Austin in Iohan. tract 118. Theophylact on Mathew 16. Beda on this Text. 1. Cor. 3. 4 22. One saith I am of Paul I am of Apollos I am of Cephas I of Christ The Gagger here from the order would proue Peter chiefe next Christ
the least omission But this obedience is impossible to be performed of any in this life for that there is both flesh and Spirit in euery man which two are such aduersaries one to another so as the best men cannot do the things which they would Galat. 5. 17. This inability through this corruption Saint Paul found and confessed to be euen in himselfe Rom. 7. 15 19. Therefore all our obedience being imperfect our workes cannot bee meritorious and cause of saluation Merit requireth perfection and admits not imperfection for cursed is euery one that keepeth not the words of the Law and fulfilleth them not in workes Deut. 27. 26. So far is man from meriting as a malediction is due if hee doe not obey the commandements Deut. 11. 28. V. It teacheth vs that therefore through this our defect good workes are secluded from being the meritorious cause of our saluation 2. Tim. 1. 9. Ephes 2. 8 9. By grace you are saued through faith not of workes that no man glory Rom. 4. 2. If Abraham was iustified by workes hee had to glory but not with God None are cleane before him Iob 25. 4 5 6. 9. 2 3. Rom. 3. 28. 9. 16. Wee account a man to be iustified by faith without the workes of the Law It is not of the willer nor of the runner but of God that sheweth mercy Psal 48. 8 9. Hee shall not In ours Psal 49. 8 9. giue vnto God his reconciliation and the price of the Redemption of his owne soule Therefore good workes though they euer accompanie those that are saued and iustified in Christ as fruits of a liuely faith yet are not the cause of saluation nor doe iustifie vs before God VI. It teacheth that God therefore to make vs accepted gaue vs his Sonne to become all in all for vs. First hee was made vnder the Law to redeeme vs from vnder it Gal. 4. 4 5. Secondly hee was made a curse for vs to redeeme vs from the curse Gal. 3. 43. Thirdly he was wounded for our iniquities and broken for our sinnes Esai 53. 5. by whose stripes we are healed 2. Pet. 2. 24. Fourthly hee himselfe bare our sinnes in his bodie vpon the tree 1. Pet. 2. 24. making Purgatorie for sinnes Heb. 1. 3. and so for vs was made sinne that we might be made the iustice of God in him 2. Cor. 5. 21. and so liue to iustice 1. Pet. 2. 24. Fiftly hereby hee is become our Wisedome Iustice Sanctification and Redemption 1. Cor. 1. 30. that we may glory in him verse 31. for in him the righteousnesse of God through faith is ours Rom. 10. 3. and 3. 22. and so there can be to vs no condemnation being in Christ Therefore hee is our merit and cause of saluation and not our owne workes VII It teacheth that the Apostle hereupon maketh mans blessednesse to consist not in his owne merits and workes but in reputing iustice without workes and in forgiuing and not imputing sinne Rom. 4. 6 7 8. which forgiuing is our keeping of the Law For as Saint Austin in retract lib. 1. cap. 19. saith All the commandements are holden to be kept when that which is not kept is forgiuen And againe All our righteousnesse saith he stands rather in the remission of our sinnes then in any perfection of iustice De ciu Dei lib. 19. cap. 27. Therefore if mans obedience and keeping be in forgiuenesse and his blessednesse stand therein without workes how is it possible to imagine workes to be the meritorious cause of our saluation VIII It teacheth that for all the graces in vs and for all our obedience to him God onely promiseth to be mercifull as in Deut. 7. 9. Thou shalt know that the Lord thy God hee is a strong and a faithfull God keeping his Couenant and mercy to them that loue him and to them that keepe his precepts So in Exo. 20. 6. Doing mercy to them that loue him and keepe his precepts Here both for the inward loue of God and outward obedience is onely promised mercy Now where mercy needeth there can be no merit Rom. 11. 6. IX It teacheth that the godly 1. acknowledge in all humilitie their sinnes Psal 51. 3 4. Esdr 9. 6. Dan. 9. 1. Secondly they vilifie themselues Iob 9. 2 3 30 31. and 42. 6. 1. Cor. 4. 4. and also those things which seeme to be of worth in them We saith the Prophet are become as one vncleane and all our iustices as the cloth of a menstruous woman Esa 64. 6. Thirdly they confesse that if God be strict in iustice none can bee able In ours Psal 130. 3. to indure Psal 129. 3. If thou shalt obserue iniquities O Lord Lord who shall sustaine it Fourthly hereupon they craue that God would not enter into iudgement with them for that so no flesh should bee iustified in his sight Psal 142. 2. Fiftly they In ours Psal 143. 2. therefore appeale from his iustice to his mercy calling and crying for it as in Psal 129. 3. With thee there is propitiation and Psal 130. 3. Psal 51. 1. saying also in Psal 50. 1. Haue mercy on me O God according to thy great mercy giuing a reason Dan. 9. 18. For not in our iustifications doe wee prostrate prayers before thy face but in thy many commiserations And therefore saith Dauid Psal Psal 119. 118. 76. Let thy mercy be done to comfort mee Hee seeketh comfort in mercy and not in merit Did these holy people of God dreame of merit and of the worth of their workes as the proud condemned Pharise did Luk. 18 or rather did they not as the poore Publican did who cryed Lord haue mercy on me a sinner and therefore went away more iustified then the other The godly know if that they should iustifie themselues their owne mouthes would condemne them Iob 9. 20. And all are by Christ Matth. 6. taught in Prayer to fly to God for mercie and to begge forgiuenesse and not to plead merit X. It teacheth that all whatsoeuer God did to Israel his people all was of his mercy Psal 135. The possession of the Psal 136. Land of Canaan was not merited by Gods people Deut. 9. 5. For saith God Not because of thy iustices and equitie of thy heart doest thou enter in to possesse thy lands I doe it not for your sake be it knowne vnto you saith the Lord but for my holy name So in Ezech. 36. 22 32. Now if the type of heauen could not bee merited by either inward grace or outward workes may we think that heauen may be merited when Saint Paul tels vs that it is the gift of God Rom. 6. 23 Gift is free and not purchased XI It teacheth that the passions of this time are not condigne to the glory to come Rom. 8. 18. If persecution and suffering Martyrdome cannot merit condignely the glory in heauen What may wee thinke of other workes whatsoeuer For neither our goods nor goodnesses is
or in any thing is to be found in him Fiftly Saint Paul speakes of his abilitie of doing all things through Christ strengthening him thereto But where is it written that Christ strengtheneth any man perfectly to fulfill the whole Law Saint Paul found not this in him as before is noted out of Rom. 7. Nor Saint Peter when hee forswore his Master and when hee after dissembled and was openly and worthily rebuked by S. Paul Gal. 2. Nor Saint Iohn when hee fell downe and would haue worshipped an Angell Reuel 19. Luk. 1. 5 6. And they were both righteous before God walking in all the commandements and ordinances of the Lord blamelesse Answ 1. That they were righteous we acknowledge it and also before God by the Text it is cleere and so are all the regenerate at this day But how by workes Not so before God The Apostle teacheth the contrary Rom. 4. 2. and the Psalmist Psal 143. 2. But by faith in Christ Rom. 4. 3 9. Phil. 3. 9. who was made sinne for vs that wee might be made the righteousnesse of God in him 2. Cor. 5. 21. By which righteousnesse we are righteous before God and yet for all this not without sinne in our selues For was not Iohn and Iames the Apostles righteous yet both acknowledge themselues to haue sinne 1. Ioh. 1. 8 10. Iam. 3. 2. Secondly Walking in all the commandements is here added as the fruit of their righteousnesse the manifest signe thereof and declaration of thankefulnesse as in Gen. 17. and not as the cause of it For by the workes of the Law shall none be iustified before God Rom. 3. 20. Thirdly a man may walke faintly he may halt yea now and then slip and yet be in the right way Fourthly by saying in all it noteth not perfection in obedience as may appeare in Dauid though of him it be said Act. 13. 22. that he should performe all Gods will yet hee fell fearefully sometime but it set out their soundnesse of heart hauing respect to all the commandements and ordinances of God as Dauid speaketh Psal 119. 6 117. for they did not seuer the commandements in their practice but made conscience of one as well as of another Fifthly whereas it is said without blame or blamelesse This is to bee vnderstood so before men but not before God For first God strucke him dumbe for his vnbeliefe verse 20. Secondly his very office as hee was a Priest conuinceth him of sinne for the Priest sacrificed as well for himselfe as for the people Heb. 5. 3. So that he was not blamelesse before God Luk. 11. 27. Blessed are they that heare the Word of God and keepe it Answ 1. This place proueth not the point in question for wee acknowledge that the regenerate doe keepe Gods Word But how Not fully and perfectly which is the question and is not hence proued Secondly imperfect obedience through Christ is accepted and such a one may be blessed Thirdly who knoweth not what imperfections are in hearing And the same is much more in keeping Fourthly hearing and keeping are a declaration of such as bee blessed and not the cause of their blessednesse The like answer may be made to Ioh. 13. 17. 14. 23. Matth. 12. 50. Luk. 11. 2. Thy will be done as in Heauen so in Earth Answ 1. This proueth not what men here on earth doe but what they should pray for and begge of God to doe Secondly wee are not here taught to begge any thing impossible neither for the word as hath not relation to the degree of absolute perfection of obedience in heauen but to the manner of doing Gods will there willingly ioyfully faithfully and constantly which we desire to imitate here according to the measure of grace which we receiued of God The Gagger calleth this Petition a demand as if in Prayer wee were not beggers but claimers of our dues and rights from God see the proud spirit of an Antichrist 1. Ioh. 5. 3. This is the loue of God that we keepe his commandements and his commandements are not grieuous Answ 1. Wee acknowledge that the loue of God neither is nor can bee without obedience to the commandements for true loue forceth thereto obedience is the true fruit of loue and the true signe thereof So as these words This is the loue of God may be thus expounded This is the true signe of the loue of God that wee keepe his commandements Secondly this doth not proue the point for wee acknowledge also the keeping of Gods commandements but wee deny the perfect keeping fully according to the rigour and strictnesse of the Law which this place speakes not of Thirdly touching the praise of them as not grieuous or heauy This is to be vnderstood not so in respect of the commandements themselues for they are a heauy yoake according to these places Act. 15. 10. Rom. 8. 3. and 7. 14. but in respect of such as be in Christ to whom the commandements are not heauy nor grieuous First for that Christ helpeth them with his grace and holy Spirit to keepe them Secondly because they truely loue God and so are willing to vndergoe any thing for Christ and so to a willing minde nothing is grieuous Thirdly for that they haue a spirituall delight in Gods commandements feeling the peace of a good conscience in well doing Fourthly for that such men doe not in their minde esteeme them heauy or grieuous Lastly they may be said not to bee heauy and grieuous respectiuely to that which they were before Christ through the manifest incumbrances vnder Moses but now Christ hath fulfilled them for vs he hath borne the burthen remoued the curse made vs by faith fulfillers of them and thus are they not heauy nor grieuous but yet it proueth not that any man can keepe the commandements The Gagger hath collected many other places onely he citeth them but vrgeth them not Ezek. 36. 27. Walke in my Statutes and keepe my iudgements and doe them Answ Here is no mention of either the manner or measure which was the thing he should haue proued else we grant all The like answer is to Ecclus 15. 15. which booke is not Canonical Matth. 11. 30. My yoake is easie and burthen is light Answ 1. Here is no mention of commandements Secondly Christs yoake is not the Law but the doctrine of the Gospell and his owne discipline Thirdly whatsoeuer is meant by yoake and burthen the same being Christs to the regenerate it is easie and light by the former reasons alledged to the place of 1. Ioh. 5. 3. Matth. 19. 17. If thou wilt enter into life keepe the commandements Answ 1. This place imposeth a duty but proueth not performance for it is one thing for God to command and another thing for man to perform his commandement Secondly Christ speakes not here thus to this yong man as imploying abilitie in him to keepe the commandements but to answer to the pride of his heart to conuict him
works supererrogatory which from hence they can neuer doe for men praised for one action iustifieth them not therefore as perfect obseruers of the Law Or for that they doe a voluntarie action praise-worthy that therefore it will follow they haue done perfectly all necessarie duties Againe these Eunuches which so made themselues they did it the text saith for the Kingdome of Heauen that is to further their passage to Heauen Now this euery man as much as lyeth in him is bound to doe and to auoid all the hinderances according to that of Christ If thy eye offend thee plucke it out if thy hand or foot cut them off so he that hath the gift of Continencie and knowes that Marriage would hinder him must make himselfe an Eunuch that is liue as an Eunuch vnmarried And this not by way of counsell but as a duty to further his owne saluation Thus this first part helps nothing to these arrogant workes Not the second for it is not a bare counsell but a very commandement of Christ to him that hath the gift of continency to vse the same He that can receiue it that is he that hath this gift giuen him of God to abstaine from marrying else hee cannot verse 11. let him receiue it that is let him abstaine from marriage This is Christs cōmandement For God giuing vs any gifts bindeth vs to make true right vse of them euen this very gift of continencie to further vs for hee giueth no gifts in vaine to any one but will require the vse thereof Luk. 12. 48. and the gift is Gods calling to employ the gift to Gods glory and to our owne comfort else he will punish the neglect Matth. 25. 15 25 27 30. The Gagger citeth Luk. 10. 25. 1. Cor. 7. 1. Reuel 4. 3. All idle and nothing to the purpose Perhaps hee found them quoted some-where and so set them downe being sure his Popish credulous Readers would neuer examine them no more then himselfe did Act. 2. 45. So chap. 4. 34. These places speake of beleeuers selling their goods and possessions and that they were distributed to the poore among them as euery one did need Answ 1. Charitie we know is a dutie commanded and so farre no worke of supererrogation Secondly at some time so the case may be that we are to forsake all for Christ and for his Gospels sake so as hee that doth it not then is so farre from doing a worke of supererrogation as hee himselfe cannot bee Christs Disciple as Christ speakes in Luk. 14. 33. Whosoeuer he be of you that forsaketh not all hee hath hee cannot be my Disciple So then that act of forsaking all may bee no worke of supererrogation but a necessarie dutie Thirdly this act here of selling and giuing all away to the poore then was a voluntarie act a vertue of very high praises yet was it no worke of supererrogation First for albeit no particular commandement did bind them hereto and so was it a free worke yet in generall they were bound to it by the commandement To loue our neighbour as our selues Now a man will sell all Iob 1. 4. to relieue his owne selfe and by the commandement to doe things honest iust pure louely of good report matters of vertue and praise Phil. 4. 8 9. The present necessitie of the Church also required a more then an ordinarie charitie and in such a case Christian compassion moueth euen deepe pouertie to be rich in liberalitie beyond abilitie 2. Cor. 8. 2 3. and so is it in such a case a dutie which at another time bindeth not Secondly it was the worke of grace in them it came of God and what they gaue to the Saints it was that which God gaue them The consideration whereof in Dauids infinite preparation for the Temple made him not to conceit any worke of supererrogation but to debase himselfe and to admire the worke of Gods grace and mercy towards him and his people therein and to giue God the sole glory thereof reade 1. Chron. 29. 13 16. Thirdly to make this act a worke of supererrogation they must proue first that all these that thus sold and gaue all away had done perfectly before God all such duties as they were bound to doe for this must euer bee presupposed before wee can dreame of any worke of supererrogation but whosoeuer presupposeth so much doth presuppose that which is most false as before is proued Iam. 3. 2. 1. King 8. 46. Eccles 7. 20. And therefore there are no workes of supererrogation For the Apostle Peter Matth. 19. 27. speakes of himselfe and of the rest that they had forsaken all But had they perfectly fulfilled the Law how came it then after that hee fell so fearefully and that they forsooke Christ and so failed of their dutie yea did not Christ often reproue their ignorance their weakenesse of faith their dulnesse of hearing and once called Peter Satan Therefore men may forsake all and yet doe therein no worke of supererrogation as the Apostle implyeth 1. Cor. 13. 3. XXXII Proposition Of iustification by faith onely BEfore the question bee propounded the Reader is to know the termes of the question and what wee meane by them First by the word iustification in this question we meane not Regeneration and Sanctification But we vnderstand first the imputation of Christs righteousnesse who by his perfect obedience fulfilled the Law and by his death paid the full ransome for sinne and fully satisfied Gods iustice all which God accepteth and accounteth as performed by vs and so maketh vs iust in Christ Thus the word iustifieth is taken in Rom. 4. 5. Whereupon the Apostle out of the Psalme defineth it the blessednesse of a man to whom the Lord imputeth righteousnesse without workes Rom. 4. 6. Psal 32. 1. Secondly remission and absolution both from the guilt as also from the punishment of sinne for Christs sake Ephes 1. 7. and so are wee pronounced iust and thus is the word iustifieth vsed Rom. 8. 33. Which two wee by faith apprehending our iustification is formally accomplished Secondly by faith wee doe meane First not the faith which is called historicall assenting and beleeuing that to be true which God speaketh Secondly not the extraordinarie faith to work miracles Thirdly nor the temporarie faith which is for a time Fourthly not any conceited fantasticall or presumptuous faith a fleeting opinion of Gods fauour standing onely in imagination Fifthly not an ignorant foolish implicite faith Sixtly not an idle fruitlesse dead faith or a solitarie faith alone without other graces but a distinct intelligent liuely operatiue obedient applicatiue faith taking hold as by a hand of Christ applying him and his benefits particularly to our selues as God of his mercie giueth him vnto vs which we doe call iustifying faith and yet not as it is a grace as other fruits of the Spirit be or that it hath any vertue or merit to iustifie vs but that it is the instrument taking hold of
1. 30. who hath perfected for euer by one offering them that are sanctified Heb. 10. 14. and so hath obtained euerlasting redemption for vs Heb. 9. 12. So as though no man can say that his heart is perfectly cleane nor that hee is pure wholly from sinne in himselfe or by himselfe yet is he in and by Christ most perfect so as he need not doubt of his saluation Iob 9. 20. If I iustifie my selfe my owne mouth shall condemne me c. Answ 1. Iob here disclaimeth his owne righteousnesse hee was then no Papist Secondly this is no argument against the assurance of his saluation For though there be no righteousnes of a mans selfe nor the righteousnesse of the Law to assure him of his saluation yet is there another righteousnesse which is called the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 4. 13. by which a true Beleeuer is certaine of his saluation And though Iob thus renounced his owne righteousnesse yet was he assured of his saluation yea and so assured as in the midst of his so grieuous afflictions he seemed through it to triumph Iob 19. 25 26 29. neither could his faith bee made to let goe its hold for hee said If hee kill mee yet will I trust in him 1. Cor. 4. 4. For I know nothing by my selfe yet am I not thereby iustified Answ 1. What is this against assurance of saluation What if Paul was no Papist reiecting iustification by workes must it needs follow that he had therefore no assurance of saluation It is cleere as before is proued that Paul was certaine of his saluation Therefore hence to fetch an vncertainty thereof crosseth the plaine euidences of his assurance and so is a lewd collection Secondly the Apostle here though hee knowes himselfe not iustified by his owne innocent liuing and righteousnesse Phil. 3. 9. yet was he sure that by Christ he was iustified Gal. 2. 16 20. 5. 20. hauing attained to that righteousnesse through faith Phil. 3. 9. Of his iustification he doubted not for hee here absolutely denyeth himselfe to know as certainly that hee is iustified by Christ Gal. 2. 20. Phil. 1. 19 20. Therefore though by the first he cannot assure himselfe of saluation yet may hee by the latter as indeed he was Rom. 8. 11 30 39. Thirdly the Apostle speaketh not here of the iustification of his person but of his office as hee was an Apostle and a Teacher of the Corinthians and of the Gentiles For when he saith I know nothing by my selfe he meaneth it of the outward dispensation of the ministerie wherein his owne conscience bare him witnesse that hee had beene faithfull as hee also speakes in 2. Cor. 1. 12. and 2. 17. and 4. 2 5. and had not failed of his duty to his witting yet could he not hereby iustifie himselfe nor would hee iudge himselfe nor regarded hee to be iustified of other but referred the iudgement thereof vnto God who saith he iudged him to wit that hee was faithfull by the testimonie of his owne conscience So as here is no argument against assurance but rather for his assurance as knowing that God iudged aright of him though neither himselfe nor other could so iudge of him Phil. 19. 12. Who can vnderstand his errours Cleanse thou mee from secret faults Answ 1. It followes not that because a man cannot know all his errours and hidden faults therefore he is not sure of his saluation For as the knowledge of them all if so a man could know them would not giue assurance of saluation for the sight of sinnes sheweth to vs misery and not hope of felicitie so the not vnderstanding them cannot debarre a man from the assurance of saluation because saluation is purchased by Christ who cleanseth vs of all sinne secret as well as open vnknowne as well as knowne and faith taking hold of the promise of the forgiuenesse of sinnes through Christ assureth of saluation Secondly this speech that none can vnderstand his errours being vnderstood of all men whatsoeuer then it comprehendeth Abraham and Moses Dauid holy Simeon Peter and Paul with other holy men who yet had assurance of their saluation as our Aduersaries deny not And therefore the not vnderstanding of all the errours of a mans life is no hindrance of the assurance of saluation 1. Cor. 10. 12. Let him that thinks that hee standeth take heed lest he fall Answ 1. Good counsell to vse meanes as wary circumspection diligent endeuour to perseuere is no argument against the certainty of saluation for sound confidence causeth no negligence in any good meanes as we may see in Saint Paul and others assured of eternall life Secondly Saint Paul speakes to the presumptuous and conceited for hee saith Let him that thinketh hee standeth take heed Thirdly grant it spoken to the best assured yet here is nothing against that assurance for the Apostle saith not Lest hee fall away as speaking of Apostacie finall but of falling into sinnes lest they prouoke God to punish them as he did the Israelites Fourthly if yet further it bee yeelded of falling away then it is to be vnderstood onely of such among them as might finally perish for Saint Paul spake to a mixt company and not of the Elect among them for in verse 13. following the Apostle strengtheneth their assurance very fully against all temptations Therefore take this place howsoeuer they please yet it is nothing against the certainty of saluation 1. Pet. 1. 17. Passe the time of your soiourning here in feare Answ Feare that is filiall attendeth on faith keepeth a man with God from falling from him and so rather assureth them then any way causeth doubting of saluation The answer before to Phil. 2. 12. is a full answer to this place Places of Scripture obiected that iustifying faith once had may bee lost and a true beleeuer finally perish And therefore no certaine assurance of saluation Before the obiected places be produced it is good to know the truth of the Tenent and how it is to be vnderstood to wit That the faith of the Elect once had cannot vtterly be lost Faith is diuersly taken in the Scripture First for historicall faith a bare and naked knowledge of God with an assent to the truths of God and profession of Religion but without liuely effects and fruits this is a dead faith Iam. 2. 17 24. Also it is taken for a certaine perswasion of some wondrous effects to bee done through Gods assisting power 1. Cor. 13. 2. Matth. 17. 20. Acts 14 9. This is called a miraculous faith Thirdly it is taken for knowledge with a ioyfull assent of the minde Matth. 13. 20. hearing gladly Ioh. 5. 35. yea and doing many things Mar. 16. 20. But this endureth but for a season Ioh. 5. 35. Mar. 4. 17. for that it hath not roote in him that hath it Matth. 13. 21. wanting moisture Luk. 8. 6. the heart being as stony ground Mar. 4. 16. and so in time of persecution for the Word
professing haue erred concerning the faith Answ Faith as before is here the sound and wholesome Doctrine of faith For it is opposed to prophane and vaine babblings and oppositions of sciences falsely so called verse 20. Also the word erred shewed as much for errour is to bee vnderstood of Doctrine and not of the gift of faith it selfe And thus is Faith taken in 1. Tim. 4. 1. Reuel 2. 5. Remember from whence thou art fallen Answ 1. Here is no mention of losse of faith of which the question is Secondly by falling here is not to be vnderstood of a totall or finall falling away but onely the decay of loue not being in him in such a degree as at the first For this Angell had yet very excellent graces in him workes labour patience zeale against false Teachers hating those whom God hated hauing patience and not fainted Reuel 2. 3 6. If he fainted not he had not lost his faith This place is therefore rather against our Aduersaries then any thing for them But our Gagger gazing about without iudgement where-euer hee found a word sounding to his fancy though nothing to purpose that hee will set downe He should haue remembred that euery sticke will not make a gagge for euery mouth Luk. 19. 24. Take from him the pound Answ 1. This is a Parable and therefore affordeth no sound demonstration by argument in a matter of controuersie Secondly if the words be to be vrged he lost not his pound but it was taken from him and then when iudgement was to bee executed vpon him Mat. 25. 30. Our question is of losing it here before iudgement Thirdly by pound here is not meant sauing faith of which the question is but some common graces afforded to Castawayes such as this man was Matth. 25. 30. which if not wel vsed or abused God may depriue a man of But where is it read that God will take away his sauing grace from any man and damne them Matth. 25. 8. And the foolish said vnto the wise Giue vs of your oyle for our Lamps are gone out Answ 1. This is a parabolicall speech and therefore is not fit for argumentation in a controuerted point Secondly by Lamps and Oyle are meant not iustification or iustifying faith or adoption or Christ being made our Wisedome for then could not the receiuers bee deciphered by the name of foolish Virgins But some other more common graces which in some receiuers vanish in others are fed and increased vnto a due progresse of life and light putting them into a true state of iustification This was only in the wise Virgins The foolish had onely a false fire or blaze of some good beginning which neuer came to growth and herein they represent the Reprobates Heb. 6. 4 5 6. It is impossible for those which were once enlightened and haue tasted of the heauenly gift and were made partakers of the holy Ghost and haue tasted the good Word of God and the powers of the world to come if they should fall away to renew them againe to repentance c. Answ 1. This is but a supposition with an If they should fall away He teacheth not positiuely that such may fall away Secondly grant that such may fall away It is meant of Reprobates and not of the Elect For they here are said to be enlightened and but to taste of the heauenly gift and Word of God c. But the Elect doe more then taste for they receiue it digest and concoct it and finde nourishment and strength thereby Againe these are such as cannot be renued by repentance which is such a falling as neuer happeneth to the Elect. Moreouer these are such as make a generall Apostacie crucifying to themselues afresh the Sonne of God and euen sinne against the holy Ghost which the Elect in Christ cannot doe So by this Text we see that they which haue these gifts and illuminations may fall totally from Christ But there bee proper graces to the Elect and such things as accompany saluation which as the Apostle was perswaded were in the Hebrewes though he thus spake vnto them verse 9. Ezek. 18. 24 26. When a righteous man turneth away from his righteousnesse Ans 1. There is a righteous man seeming so before men Mat. 9. 13. but is not before God such a one may turne from his righteousnesse and such a one is here meant For this righteous man here so falls as that he may commit all the abominations that the wicked doth verse 24 and dye therein verse 26. and so apostate finally but a righteous man before God doth not so for he shineth more and more vnto the perfect day Prou. 4. 18. and shall be in euerlasting remembrance Psal 112. 6. and his memory is blessed Prou. 10. 7. Secondly there is a double righteousnesse the one Legall and the other Euangelicall which is the righteousnesse of faith that is the righteousnesse of Christ applyed to vs by faith and so made ours which cannot be lost because it is Christs But the other may and this is the righteousnesse which here the Prophet speaketh of For this righteousnesse is such as is blotted out by sinne and which in the day of trespasse shall not be mentioned as not being able to cleere him before God vers 24. But Euangelicall righteousnes is not blotted out in the day of mans transgression but is able to pacifie Gods wrath and keepe the repentant in Gods fauour Besides these many obiected places against the assurance of saluation they alledge reasons especially these which to the ignorant carry a great shew Obiection First that God in the Scripture doth not speake particularly by name to any that he shal be saued And therfore no mā can haue faith to beleeue certainly himselfe to be saued because there is not any such particular word of personall saluation to any man Answ There is in effect as much counteruailing a particular promise as if the true-hearted Beleeuer were personally named The promises are propounded in general It is true that in Gods book we find the proposition only in this māner Mar. 16. 16. He that beleeueth and is baptized shall be saued Ioh. 3. 15. Whosoeuer beleeueth in him shall not perish but haue life euerlasting Act. 10. 43. Whosoeuer beleeueth in him shall receiue remission of sinnes and shall not be ashamed Rom. 9. 33. 10. 11. The assumption or Minor is suggested by experience I beleeue Thence the conscience with comfort inferreth the conclusion necessarily following Therefore I shall not perish but haue life euerlasting First these and such like promises in generall to all include particular persons Whence it is that sometime they are propounded singularly in the second person If thou confesse with thy mouth the Lord Iesus and beleeue in thine heart thou shalt bee saued Rom. 10. 9. Awake thou that sleepest and arise from the dead and Christ shall giue thee light Ephes 5. 14. Thus speaking as to particular men Secondly Gods Ministers