Sathan trueth or vnrighteousnesse Tim. Which of these Lords is it best to be seruant vnto Sil. Vnto Christ and his truth because this seruice bringeth liberty wealth pleasure safety dignity and honour Prou. 3. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Tim. How may we know whether wee serue trueth or lust Sil. First we are seruants vnto that which we are obedient vnto Secondly our seruice is knowne by our loue and care what wee like best and take most care and paines to please that is our lord Tim. But are Gods children wholy freed from vnrighteousnesse Sil. No surely but they are not seruants to it it still abideth in them but it reigneth not ouer them it hath force and might to drawe them aside from the trueth of reason and of faith but without dominion ouer them Tim. Which lord do the wicked serue Sil. Vnrighteousnesse and lust by which seruice they gaine shame bitter griefe horrour of conscience daunger of this life and far more in the life to come Tim. What remaineth for them in the life to come Sil. Tribluation anguish wrath and indignation Tim. What did we learne out of these words Sil. That euill men after they are dead must suffer for sinne Secondly that the paines which they must suffer are extream Thirdly that their paines shal be both very great and sundry or of diuers sorts as the change of the wordes doeth imply Lastly this should serue to keepe men from sinning against God also to stirre vp men after they haue sinned vnto serious repentance Tim. How many things consider we in this Text Silas Three things First what is meant by persons and respecting of persons Secondly in what things it may appeare that God doth not respect persons Thirdly how farre forth we are to respect persons without sinning Tim. What is meant by persons Sil. The outward qualities as riches pouerty birth country friends some of these qualities are of our own election as to be a Captaine a Souldior a Magistrate a Minister Some put vpon vs by God as Country birth riches and pouerty The meaning then of these wordes is this that God is not moued with any of these qualities to loue or to hate to refuse or to receiue any to fauour no nor yet with any guifts either naturall as wit memory vnderstanding or gotten by labour as Learning Arts experience Tim. But was is not a respecting of persons when all men being alike in Adam he chose some to saluation and refused others Sil. It was not for these reasons First persons in this phrase of Scripture doth not signifie men and woemen Secondly Gods decree was before eyther there were men or woemen that is before they had any being Thirdly there must needs be a reiecting of some where some be elected Fourthly that which moued him to make this difference was not any condition or qualities in the parties but his good pleasure Fifthly the elect are not saued but by the merits of Christ the others are not condemned but by the desert of their sinnes adde hereunto that God is not tyed vnto any law and therefore cannot wrong any or offend against equity Tim. In what things may it appeare that God respecteth no persons Sil. In these two things First in bestowing his spirituall guifts and graces which he giueth to poore and meane ones as well as to great and rich ones as his effectuall calling faith repentance Secondly in inflicting his iudgements for sinne which he punisheth in great and rich ones as well as in poore and meane ones Tim. What vse are we to make heereof Sil. That we ought to be like vnto God heerein not to respect persons but to iudge according to the cause Tim. In how many things are not we to respect persons Silas In foure things First the Minister in deliuering Doctrine Math. 22 Thou teachest truely and respectest no mans person Secondly the Magistrate in administring iustice Deut. 16 19. Thirdly all Christians in their censure and iudgement of actions good and euill Fourthly in hauing the precious faith without respect of persons Iames 2 1. Tim. But there is some case wherein it is good to respect persons Sil. True as in giuing reuerence to euery man according to his estate and guifts examples heereof we haue in Abraham towards the Hittites in Ioseph towards Pharao in Salomon towards his mother the reason whereof is the authority and guists of our betters to whom ciuill reuerence is due DIALOGVE VIII Verse 12. For as many as haue finned without the Law shall perish without the Law and as many as haue sinned in the Law shall bee iudged by the Law Tim. VVHat is the purpose of the blessed Apostle in this present Text and how proceedeth hee Sil. The same as before to proue the iudgement of God in punishing sinners to be iust and himselfe to be no accepter of persons because howsoeuer the Iewes and Gentiles be vne quall in knowledge yet he will indifferently punish both both being sinners And heere Paul draweth neere to the particular obiections of Iewes and Gentiles preuenting them in that they would plead and lay in against this equity of Gods distributiue Iustice which the Iewes thought it should not take hold on them beecause God had graced and adorned them with the benefit and priuiledge of the Law by hauing whereof they looked not to be condemned but iustified the Gentiles seeing they wanted the Law deemed it hard to bee condemned whereunto he saith in this verse that it shall no whit helpe the Iewes that they had the Law northe Gentiles that they lacked it for notwithstanding this difference both were worthy to perish seeing both had in them sinne the proper cause of damnation This is the drift and sum of this verse and thus Paul proceedeth Tim. But why saith be of the Gentiles that they are without a Law as hauing no Law Silas This is spoken in comparison the Gentiles had not the Law so plainely deliuered in writing as the Iewes had yet were they not without a Law which he proueth afterward by two manner of wayes in the verses 14 15. the one externall doing some good things the other internall the testimony of Conscience Tim. How can they be said to sinne seeing sinne it the transgression of the Law which they were without Sil. They did sinne by breaking such a Law as was giuen them though they wanted Moyses Law Also they were finners against the Law of Creation which when Adam did breake he wrapt himselfe and all his posterity euen Infants in damnation Tim. What meaneth he when hee saith they shal perish Silas That their ignorance of Moyses Law should not excuse them from guilt and punishment of sin because they shall bee iudged by that Lawe of Nature against which they sinned Tim. What instructions are to be receiued from hence Sil. Two First that God giueth not the knoledge of his will to all alike For the Iewes had more knowledge and the Gentiles had lesse Secondly that
are offenders of vs being ready to receiue them to fauour whensoeuer they truely repent Tim. Howe vnderstand ye this that all men are vnder death Sil. After this sort first euery man so soone as hee is borne is euery houre apt to die Secondly euery man at his birth is spiritually dead quite destitute of Gods grace and holy spirit Ephe. 2 1. till his regeneration Thirdly euery person deserueth this death to become eternall euen euerlasting separation from GOD and his presence and felicity Tim. What equity or iustice is there in this Sil. The equity is iust for that one mans sinne was euery mans sinne for Adam was the roote of our kinde and therefore this fault is not personall resting in himselfe but reaching to all his posterity which were then in his loynes as Leuy was in Abrahams loynes Heb. 7 10. For such iuice as is in the tree commeth to all the branches also such as is the water in the fountaine such it is in the riuer and some such diseases as be in the parents descendeth to the children also amongst vs men the father beeing a Traytor the whole bloud is tainted Lastly the righteousnesse of Christ the head is conuayed ouer to the members so it is here againe God who is most iust so decreed and would haue it that the grace which Adam had hee should keepe or loose for himselfe and all mankinde who were to stand and fall wih him thus it appeares to be very equall Tim. What instructions learn ye hence Sil. First it reproues the vulgar conceit that God will not punish but for actuall sinnes Secondly it reprooues some Papists which exempt the Virgin Mary from this generall condition of sinne and death Thirdly it doeth admonish vs of our most wofull condition which wee are in without Christ. Fourthly it puts vs in minde of mutuall compassion seeing our case is equall one no better then another all alike 〈◊〉 and wretched Fistly it teacheth the necessity of a Sauiour not onely to know there must be one and who he is and what he hath done but to gette him to become ours by beleeuing the promises of him Tim. What are we to be put in minde of by the connexion and ioyning together of sin and death Sil. First that euery one is bound to make account of dying euery moment hauing sinne the matter and means of death still about him Secondly that the dāme of such a brood that is sinne which causeth no lesse then death is most carefully to be auoyded and abhorred euen to be fled from as one would flie from death Moreouer think that if an others sinne could doe this as to make thee culpable of death what will that sinne do which thou doest in thine owne person for Adams sinne is thine in account not in act yet so as this proueth Adams sinne to bee euery mans owne proper sinne as if he had himselfe acted and done it because else he should not dye for it for men in iustice are not to suffer death for any sinne saue that which is their owne by act or imputation Christ had had wrong done to him to be brought to death if sinne had no way belonged vnto him for death is not inflected but with reference to sin DIAL XI Verses 13 14. For vnto the time of the law was sin in the worlde but sinne is not imputed where there is no lawe But death raigned from Adam to Moyses euen ouer them that sinned not after the like manner of the transgression of Adam Tim. WHat is the drift of this scripture Sil. He proceedeth in his purpose to proue all men euen to the yong In fants newly borne to bee through Adam sinnetull by bringing in a secret obiection and answering it Tim. What is the obiection and how is it answered Sil. The obiection is this there could be no sin nor sinners before Moses seeing there was no law where there is no lawe there is no sinne This obiection the Apostle doeth answere two wayes first by a distinction betweene being and reputing sinne was in the world before Moses law yet not so reputed and esteemed so vile and soule seeing yet no law was giuen them Secondly hee prooues there was sin by the effects of sinne which is death whereunto euen before Moses law both olde and young were subiect which is a sufficient proofe that then all men sinned death being the stipend of sinne Tim. Now expound the wordes and tell vs what is meant here by this vntill the time of the law Sil. That is to say all that time that passed betweene Adam and Moses so expounded verse 14. Death raigned from Adam to Moyses Tim. What is meant hereby that sinne was in the world till then Sil. That is to say men which liued in this world had sin in them as well before the law as afterwards Tim. But howe could that bee seeing that yet there was no law and sin is the transgression of some law and indeede what law could be giuen to some of them as to Infants which had no vse of reason Sil. Therefore the Apostle in affirming that notwithstanding this there was sinne in the world hee meaneth there was a sinne euen afore the Law by which sin al men were borne sinners being both guilty of wrath and corrupted euen from the wombe This is the sinne of Adam in whose sinning all men were comprehended he being head and roote of our kinde as was sayd verse 12. Tim. Belike then this is now the scope of the Apostle to proue That as al men are guilty by their owne sinnes vvhich they do in their owne persons and haue in their owne Nature so there is a sinne of Adam by guilt whereof al men are obnoxious and culpable of death Sil. True this is in verie deede that which is intended and wherein Adam is like Christ the one being fountaine of sinne vnto death the other of righteousnesse to life Tim. What meane ye heereby in that it is saide Where no Law is there sin is not imputed Silas That afore the Law was giuen sin was not so thoroughly knowne and reputed but when the law was published it was better knowne and became more greeuous Tim. But may not these words carrie another sence which may wel stand with the Apostles minde and drift Silas They may so as thus that such as liued in the world after Adam though they wanted Moyses Law yet they wanted not a Law altogither Tim. How makes he that appeare Silas Heereby because that sinne was imputed and men became thereby guilty of wrath Tim. What Law might that be Silas The Lawe of nature giuen them in their Creation Tim. What examples can yee giue that sin was imputed to men before the giuing of the Law by Moyses Sil. Sundry and very manifest First the punishment of Caines murther Gen. 4 11. Secondly the reprehension of Abimelech Gen. 20 6. Thirdly the ouerthrow of the world by a flood Gen. 7 20.
this condemnation vpon vs all Sil. By the guilt of one offence which Adam did being imputed and reckoned vnto all his progeny Tim. Should this one offence without any more haue condemned and adiudged vs all to destruction eternally Sil. It should so for the Apostle in the words of trueth doth auouch it and that not without good reason for this is reason enough that it was Gods wil to haue it so whose will is neuer seuered from reason and Iustice for there is no iniquity with God Psal. 5. 4. and Psal. 45 7. Tim. What may we learne hence for our instruction Sil. That sinne is no ieasting matter and the offence of diuine iustice is no light thing but the most dreadfull euill in the world Secondly that infinite misery by due desert lies vpon euery man that is condemned not onely for Adams fault but for so many thousand sins as himselfe hath done in his life time Tim. What is meant here by iustification Sil. An acquiting or absoluing of sinners from all their faults both Adams and their own and pronouncing them iust from God adiudging them woorthy of eternall life through Christ whose fulfilling of the law in his obediēce and death not onely maketh himselfe iust but causeth also all-his members to bee absolued from all sinnes and to be pronounced iust so soone as they are conuerted and do beleeue Tim. What doth follow hereof Sil. Thus much that fithence the iuftice of Christ freeth vs from Adams offence and al our sinnes added to that and more ouer maketh vs iust before God when we be sinners so as wee stand before the tribunall seat of God not only without all manner of sin but decked with absolute righteousnesse according to our estate and degree which wee had by creation therefore it is true that the grace of God hath abounded aboue the fault of Adam But seeing Adam by his offence corrupted vs all and spoyled both vs and himselfe of perfect innocency and moreouer that all other sins come in by him and his one offence it should appeare that the good which Christ hath brought doeth not exceed the hurt we take from Adam but that they are equall at the least as much guilt and hurt by the one as benefit by the other Silas It is true that we haue lost a perfect righteousnesse in Adam but yet the person of Christ considered we haue a more excellent righteousnes from him which bringeth vs to a blessed life in Heauen Secondly it is also true that all other sinnes do come from originall sinne yet they are not of necessity knit vnto it for then all men should haue the selfe same sinnes euery one should doe such sinnes as others doe Abell should haue done murther as Cain Iacob should haue been prophane as Esau Peter should haue beene a Traitor like Iudas c. which is not so Therefore other sins of our life though they spring from the roote of birth-sinne yet our sclues are to be blamed for them as being done by our owne election and consent Now Iesus Christ our redeemer absolueth and freeth vs not onely from that one sinne of Adams but from innumerable heapes brought in vpon that by our owne deliberation and counsell and so excelleth it very farre for to take away many sinnes is more then to bring in one offence and a righteousnesse which consists of many good acts as Christs doth is more excellent then one sinneful act such as Adams transgression was Tim. But all are made sinners and condemned by Adams offence so are not all iustified and saued by Christ therefore Adams sinne exceeds the grace of Christ. Silas The power and force of Christs righteousnesse aboue Adams offence respects not number of persons but worthinesse and number of effects which are more and also more worthy from the righteousnes and grace of Christ. For first it blotteth out Adams sinne and all others as touching guilt Secondly it breaketh the strength and rage of sinne Thirdly it reformeth the heart to new obedience and giueth interest to perfect glory Tim. But for the number may it not be truely saide in some sence that as many be saued by Christ as perished by Adam Silas It should seeme that it may in this sense onely Infants which dye in their infancy do perish by original sinne and not all they but such onely as are not elect such as be men and perish do perish for their impenitency and continuance in actuall sinnes and not onely for their birth-sinne Whereas all that be saued whether infants or men are saued by the grace of Christ onely Adde here-vnto that touching such as do perish Christ were sufficient to saue them as most Diuines affirme but because God will not saue all therefore his grace hath no effect in them for being not ordained to life neither are they ordained to faith whereby the righteousnesse of Christ is laid hold on yet they worthily perish for their sinnes which they willingly doe O Israel thy destruction is of thy selfe Tim. What is the instruction from all this Sil. That the grace of Christ hath ouercome sinne as Conqueror ouer it for else sinne would ouercome all the elect also the Scripture witnesseth so much to wit that Christ is stronger then Sathan or sinne Tim. But sinne shall abide in the regenerate Silas Yet it cannot hurt them because it is taken Prisoner and broken in the strength of it also the faithfull are commanded to beleeue the remission of all their sinnes by Christ. Tim. What vse of all this Silas In this necessary Doctrine consists all Christian comfort and assurance of hope therefore it is that 〈◊〉 so much urgeth it DIAL XIIII Verse 17. For if by the offence of one death raigned through one much more shal they which receiue that abundance of grace and of that gift of righteousuesse raigne in life through one lesus Christ. Tim. VVHat doth this text contayne Sil. A repetition of the former matter touching the excelency of the grace of Christ aboue the sin of Adam somewhat more fully and plainly set forth Tim. What is the substance of this 17. verse Sil. This that if Adam could powre sinne and death into men so as they raigned or had rule in them much more is this to be granted to Christ that he can giue grace righte ousnesse and life and that liberally and so plentifully as to make them also euen to raigne in his members Tim. What contraries be here expressed Sil. Three offence and righteousnes death and life Adam and Christ. Tim. How is the grace of Christ amplified and set foorth Sil. Three wayes first it is called aboundance of grace which is more then barely to say grace Secondly gift of righteousnesse which is more then to say barely righteousnesse Thirdly raigne in life which is more then to obtaine life Tim. But what new thing hath this verse differing from the former Sil. First it expresseth the meanes how the righteousnesse of Christ becommeth ours
sorts First it maketh appeare vnto vs what is euill and sin and what is not Secondly it brings vs to behold the nature of sin how vile and filthy it is being against a righteous lawe and an infinite diuine iustice Thirdly it reueales the danger of sin what hurt it bringeth to the committers of it to wit no lesse then euerlasting destruction in hell after all the miseries of this life Lastly it giues a feeling of sinne in our hearts troubling our Consciences by some certaine byting and sting This experimentall knowledge is that which is chiefely meant heere where we are further to note that howsoeuer all Lawes both ciuill ceremoniall and iudicial as the law of nature also serueth to manifest sinne yet the morall Law of God being written by Moyses and rightlie vnderstood doth performe this office of reuealing sin most fully and feelingly because it striketh at the roote discouering our hidden and secret euil thoughts causing vs to seele the force of sin inasmuch as God himself in this Law doth with great power speake to the conscience for it hath his spirit ioyned with it which deserying and laying open our hidden naughtinesse and our bondage to it breeds terror in vs Rom. 8 15. Tim. What may be the vse of this first instruction Sila First it doth admonish all men to bee conuersant in the Lawe of God and to studie it if they do desire to be more and more acquainted with their own sins and wofull estate thorough the same Secondly it renders a reason why men haue so slender a sight of sins eyther their owne or others because they are ignorant vnsensible of the Law Thirdly it warneth the godly to bee thankefull vnto God who hath giuen them the Law to be as it were a Sentinell to bewray their enemy to them and a scourage to driue them forward to lesus Fourthly this directeth vs how to reade and heare the Law with fruite namely when wee finde out some thing by it which must bee forgiuen by mercie and repented of or amended by grace Lastly it serueth to pul downe our stomackes and hearts by the viewe of our owne sinfull estate to force vs vnto Christ and to make much of his grace and merites Thus farre of the first instruction Tim. Now tell vs of what knowledge the Apostle speaketh when he saith He had not knowne Lust c. As also what Law he speaketh of Silas He meaneth the morall Law or ten Commandements as is plaine by the instance of Lust which is sorbidden or condemned in euery one of them as the root whence springeth all other sinnes As for knowledge he meaneth both speculatiue and experimentall but rather this so as the sence is this I had neuer vnderstood lust to be a sinne at all or felt it to be so grieuous a sinne as now I doe without the helpe and light of Gods Lawe which forbiddeth Lust. Hence wee are put in minde againe how diligently the Law of God is to bee learned and weighed of vs seeing without it the hidden sinnes of our nature cannot bee espyed and knowne nor the force of sin so throughly felt as to enforce vs to Christ. Tim. But what Lust may it be that this our Text mentioneth for there be sundry sorts of Lusts some be good lusts which he cannot meane and sinful lusts be not all of one kind Shew vs which of them is vnderstood heere Sil. It is true as ye say for there be naturall Lustes when things tending to preseruation of our own nature are desired there is also a spiritual lust an hungring thirsting for iustice which is a desire of heauenly things that come from the Spirite and also there is carnall sinfull Lust which is of things contrary vnto God These be meant heere but not all these For of sinnefull lustes there be sundry kindes As first Originall lust which is the fountaine roote and spring of all other sins being that which is called byrth-sinne or corruption of Nature This Originall Lust is an impotencie of mans heart whereby it is inordinately disposed to this or that euill Secondly actuall lust which is euerie euill motion and desire of the soule against the law of God This proceeds as a fruite from the former Rom. 6 12. of which there are two degrees the one is an euill motion of the minde suddenly conceiued without consent of will this is called voluntarie Lust. The other is an euill motion which goeth together with consent and is ioyned with purpose and deliberation lames 1 15. This is called voluntary lust because it hath the consent of our will and is not onely in desire but in resolution to effect it if occasion serue Now our Text doth not speake of our voluntary lusts which are consented vnto by our will and resolued vpon First because without the morall Law Paul might know these lusts to be sinne by the light of naturall reason as many Heathens did Secondly by that which followes in this Chapter it appeares he speakes of such lusts as be resisted and irkesome to a godly minde which doe leade the Saints captiue euen against their will making them cry out O miserable men and therefore it is an originall lust which is the prauity of nature disposed to euil which is meant here and also the first degree of actuall lusts to wit such as go before consent the moral law being rightly vnderstood of the Apostle gaue him light to see that those lustes were sinnes deseruing eternal death which before he knew the law he did not perceiue or once surmise it to be so or to sticke so deeply in his nature and so to make him obnoxious to Gods wrath Tim. Let vs now heare what doctrines and lessons we are to gather from hence Silas The first is this the miserable estate wherein all men stand by Adams fall hauing their nature wholly poysoned and corrupted by sin Iusting after euill things alone in so much as if we should neuer thinke speake nor doe euill yet our very corruption of nature beeing the breach of Gods eternall law maketh vs guilty of eternall wrath Secondly our euill desires and motions though they be misliked and striuen against yet they be sinnes and deserue Hell fire because they are transgressions of the Law Tim. What vse and profit is to be made of these doctrines Silas First euery one must see that they haue need of the death and bloud-shedde of Christ euen for the least vaine and sinnefull thought or imagination yea for healing their infected dead nature Secondly that euery one must be humbled mourne and with sighes craue pardon for such thoughts and for their naturall inclination to sinne Thirdly all Christians stand bound not onely to take care and heed of their words and workes but euen of their thoughts and desires for there must a Conscience be made not onely of what men speake and doe but what men thinke and desire Fourthly it serues to
Nebuchadnezar when their captiuity was sharpe and their deliuerance long deferred yet because temporal deliuerance were Tipes of eternall and depended vpon Christ it is not to be doubted but Paul hath rightly applied it to the spirituall deliuerance by the Messiah to come through Faith Wherby the elect both vnder Law and Gospel were safe and made pertakers as well of Iustification and remission of sinnes presently as of life eternall in the Heauens Which concord in this great trueth of righteousnesse by Faith betweene the Prophets and Apostles it is implied not obscurely by this Particle As and whereas Paul ascribeth vnto holy Scripture the authority to proue the question in hand whether Faith or workes do iustifie before God we may note further in what estimation wee ought to haue the written word namely to account it the perfect rule of al diuine truth acording to which we ought to examine and iudge of al controuersies in matter of Faith and Religion for it is the wont of this blessed Apostle when he will confirme any Christian Doctrine or determine any doubt or question which may arise about it still to runne vnto Scriptures for probation which shewes the Scriptures alone to be a sufficient directory and a competent Iudge of all controuersies in Religion Tim. What did we obserue in the authority it selfe Sil. The reading and the Interpretation The reading standeth thus The iust by Faith shall liue this is the better reading or thus The iust shall liue by Faith this is the worse as though we were first iust and afterward should liue by Faith Also the word His is in the Prophet The iust shall liue by his owne Faith but it is left out by Paul because it is sufficient without the pronowne to proue his purpose that The iust by Faith shall liue Tim. What is the Interpretation of these words as they were first vsed of the Prophet Habakkuk Sil. To shew the duty of iust men in dangerous times namely by Faith to waite and rest vpon God if they would liue and be preserued when other which had confidence in themselues were destroyed Tim. What is the meaning as Paul sciteth it Sil. To teach thus much that such as imbrace righteousnesse by Faith shall be saued from Sinne Hell and Sathan and liue eternally in Heauen as well as be deliuered heere in earth from temporall dangers Tim. What Doctrines were gathered heere Sil. These three chiefely First that none shall liue but the iust Secondly none iust but by Faith Thirdly euery one is iustified by his owne Faith Tim. Why shall none liue saue the iust Sil. Because God hath not promised life but to such as are iust as it is written Doe this and liue Secondly he threatneth death to sinne and to all vnrighteousnesse therefore all vniust persons are certain to perish which sheweth the necessity of seeking and getting perfect iustice by beleeuing the gospell Tim. Why is none Iust saue by Faith Silas Because all men euen the best do lacke righteousnesse of their owne therefore they must seek it elswhere in Christ by Faith Rom. 10 3 4 5. Phil. 3 7 8 9. Tim. How is it declared that none is Iustified but by his owne Faith Silas As none seeth but with his owne eye or taketh hold of a thing but with his owne hand or eateth but with his owne mouth or walketh but with his owne feete so none seeth Christ to be his Sauiour or taketh hold of his merites or feedeth on him or walketh and commeth to him any otherwise then by his own Faith which is the eye hand and mouth of the soule Tim. What other things learned we from this Text Silas That we haue many notable benefites by Faith to wit Saluation Righteousnesse and Life who of all other be most principall Secondly that to liue by faith it is to exercise Patience Hope Wisedome Loue Obedience out of a liuely Faith by which a Christian is made able to mooue himselfe to all good duties vnto which by power of Nature wee can by no meanes attaine Tim. Is there any further thing to be obserued in this Text for our instruction Silas Yea it commendeth vnto vs the difference betweene the Law and the Gospell how the righteousnesse of the one is distinguished from the other For the righteousnesse of the Law requireth workes and the fulfilling of the Commandements Leuit. 18 5. Galath 3 12. But the Gospell saith The Iust by Faith shall liue The righteousnesse of the Law is a perfect obedience the righteousnesse of the Gospell is an imputation thereof to the Elect Sinner at what time he beleeueth Rom. 4 24. The Righteousnesse of the gospell God giueth to vs but the righteousnes of the Law men do giue it to God There is good vse of this difference and is to be held constantly because it freeth the trobled Conscience from snares and perplexities when hee shall perceiue that though he lacke good Workes and be full of wicked manners yet vnto the forgiuenesse of sinnes and absolution before God it is enough only to beleeue in Christ according to the gospel Secondly it takes from man al cause of reioycing and glorying in himselfe that he may glory only in this That he knowes God to be mercifull to pardon his sinne and accept him for righteous when by his sinfull Workes and transgressions of the Lawe hee deserued death Ier. 9 23. DIAL X. Verse 18. For the Wrath of God is reuealed from heauen against all vngodlinesse and vnrighteousnes of Men which with-hold the truth in vnrighteousnes Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text how doth it depend vpon and sort with the former Verse Silas The drift and purpose is to confirm the maine and grand proposition that sinners are Iustified and saued by the Faith of the gospell The argument is from the contrary Sinners are not Iustified by their Works therefore by Faith For in the cause of Iustification faith and workes haue the condition of contraries Rom 11 6. Now touching things which be immediately contrarie the maxime and rule is that when the one is denied the other is affirmed and what is taken from the one is giuen to the other it doth then necessarily followe that righteousnesse must be had by Faith seeing it cannot be had by workes Aud why not by workes Was it not the common and generally receiued opinion both amongst Philosophers and the Iewes themselues that Workes were the cause of righteousnesse To this secret Obiection the Apostle answereth by a reason taken from the contrary effects as thus Men cannot bee righteous by their Workes because their workes were wicked and vniust therefore punished of God which he proueth by a distribution of Gentiles vnto Chap. 2. Verse 17. and thenceforward of the Iewes till Chap. 3. verse 22. Tim. How many things are noted in this Text Silas Three First that the Gentiles had knowledge of God and good things naturally ingrafted in them signified by the word Truth
ignorance of Gods word will excuse no man it will not absolue the Gentiles from condemnation because they knewe not Moyses Law Tim. What Reasons to disswade Christians from Ignorance Silas It is a sinne being contrary to the Law Secondly it is the cause of many sinnes men do both erre and sinne for that they know not the Scriptures Thirdly it is a part of Satans kingdome yea the strength thereof Fourthly it maketh men like Beasts like diuels Tim. What meanes to obtaine knowledge Sil. Prayer Meditation Reading Hearing Conference Tim. What is the meaning of that he saith As many as sin in the Law Silas That is such as had and did know the Lawe of Moyses and yet sinned against it should receiue sentence of death from it Tim. What things may we learne from hence Sil. Three verie profitable Lessons First the law of Moyses is not able to keepe from sinning and to iustifie such as haueit for the Law was giuen to other purposes First to giue knowledge of sinne Secondly to reueale the wrath of God against sinners Thirdly to be a Schoolemaister vnto Christ Gal. 3 24. Tim. What was the second instruction Silas That many which know the Law of God after their knowledge do still liue in sinne which is a verie fearfull thing Tim. What Reasons haue we to liue according to our knowledge Silas Verie many and great First so it is commanded in sundry places Secondly the end of our knowledge is practise Thirdly knowledge without practise it is not only vaine but verie hurtfull Fourthly if wee practise that we know we are like to Christ and the Saints Fiftly we are vnlike to the Reprobates and wicked mē Sixtly all Gods benefits and corrections call vpon christians to be obedient to our knowledge Lastly it is a token of the childe of God to be a keeper of the word 1 Iohn 2 4 5. Tim. What is the third Lesson Silas That the Law should iudge them that are breakers of it this should admonish vs that wee doe with great reuerence and care obserue and keepe it because they that do sinne against the Law it will bee a seuere Iudge against them DIALOGVE IX Verse 13 14. For in the sight of God the hearers of the Law shall not be iustified but the doers of the same For when the Centiles which haue not the Law do by Nature the thinges contained in the Law they hauing not a Law are a Lavv vnto themselues Tim. WHat is the drift of this Text Silas To answere more distinctly the obiection which the Gentils or Iewes might make for themselues The Iew he might obiect that seeing he had the law of Moses there was wrong done to him to match him with the Gentiles in the case of sinne and damnation Vnto which the Apostle answered that they being breakers of the Law could haue no benefit of saluation from the Lawe which saueth none but the perfect keepers of it There is a perfect keeping of the Law either by Christ his obedience imputed to the beleeuer of this Paul speaketh not yet till the third and fourth Chapters or else suppose any man by his owne strength could fulfill the Law then should he thereby be iustified of this the Apostle heere in this place is to be vnderstood Moreouer there is a double Iustification one in opinion when men think and presume they be iust as the Lawyer did that questioned with Christ Luke 10. the Pharisies Luke 16 15. Ye are they which iustifie your selues The other is in truth before God which the Apostle meaneth heere and saith that if any in their deedes could answere the perfection of the Law thereby hee should be absolued and pronounced iust euen in Gods sight which is the true meaning of the word Iustified both heere and elswhere as appeareth by the opposition between Perishing Iustifying as also between condemning and Iustifying Rom. 8 33. and especially by that place in Acts Chapt. 13 39. From all things from vvhich ye could not be Iustified c. where the word can haue no other sense but Absolued Note further there is a legall Iustification and an Euangelicall The latter is by Christ thorough Faith the former by keeping the law perfectly For the end of the Law is not knowledge but practise to make the creature wholy conformable to the Creator therefore it must iustifie the performer Of this Iustification Legall Paul now entreateth Tim What vvas the lesson taught from hence Silas That the Law absolueth a man giueth righteousnesse and eternall life to them which by their owne strength do perfectly keepe the Law and not to them which only know and professe it Tim. What belongs to the perfect keeping of the Law Sil. Three things First that all bee fulfilled without failing in one iot Secondly that it be kept all our life long euen to and euen in the last gaspe Thirdly that it be kept in perfect manner with perfect loue of God and our neighbour Tim. Doth the Law reward with life eternall those which thus keepe it Silas It doth so by reason of the couenant which God hath made Do this liue Leuit. 18 5. Tim. Can any person thus perfectly do the Law Sil. None saue Adam in his innocency the man Christ all other men without exception break it The reason whereof is because all men being borne in sin cannot but in euery thing transgresse the Law till they be sanctified and after they be sanctified they can keep the Law but not perfectly because their new birth is imperfect in this life sinne still striuing against grace whereof it followes that none can challenge at all life eternall by the Law or the workes thereof as they bee done by vs. Tim. What is the Obiection of the Gentiles Sil. They might alledge that they had wrong done them to be condemned seeing they wanted the Law of Moyses Vnto which obiection the Apostle doth answer that though they lacked Moyses law yet they were not altogither without a Law First because that they did such things as Moyses Law required to be done Secondly because their thoughts excusing them in their well-doing and accusing them in euill doing did witnesse they had a Law euen the Law of Nature though not the Law of Moyses Tim. What is it to do such thinges as bee contained in the Law Silas First that in matter of Religion to think there is a God and that he ought to be worshipped Secondly in matters of manners to doe good things as to releeue the poore to helpe the helplesse to speake truth c. Thirdly in matters of policy to punish vices forbidden and to do good things commaunded by good lawes to restraine from euil and to constraine to good Tim. Did the Gentiles all this Sil. They did so as it is manifestly knowne by their Books and Stories which witnesseth of many that they both taught and practised honesty Tim. What letteth that they pleased not God
on this condition to keepe the law perfectly or else not to haue them because then these promises should bee voyde seeing none fulfil the law and so we should euer be doubtfull Tim. What is the second reason why the fulfilling of the law is no condition of the promise Sil. It is taken from an euident effect of the law through our default not of the law it selfe as thus the law accuseth vs and pronounceth vs guilty of wrath that is of punishment therefore remission of sinnes and saluation is not from the law for we cannot be saued by that which condemneth vs and punishment is repugnant to the inheritance and promise Tim. How commeth it that the law condemneth vs to punishment Sil. Through our trāsgression and breaking of it wherby we fall into the wrath of God for there must needs be transgression where there is a law because mans corruption cannot obserue it and where there is transgression there must needes bee wrath and such as are subiect to wrath and vengeance are voyde of eternall life therefore the Apostle reasoneth well that the inheritance is not by fulfilling the law because the law causeth wrath by reuealing it and declaring vs guilty of it insomuch as wee haue broken the law Tim. What woorketh this in men that the lawe causeth wrath Sil. In wicked men it worketh a hatred of GOD and causeth them to flye from him and strue against him but in the elect it leadeth them to Christ as the disease being felt driueth to the Physition Tim. What vse is there of this Sil. It serueth first to reproue the Papists who teach that eternall life may be merited by the workes of the lawe as one should say that life may bee found in death peace in wrath Secondly it reprooueth ignorant Christians who attribute saluation to their good deedes and seruing of God Thirdly it teacheth the true bounds and limits of the law that it was not giuen to iustifie and therefore that we should not leane to the law for saluation but hauing learned and beene made to feele by it that we are vnder wrath thereby to be driuen vnto Christ our peace-maker as the sence and smart of our wounds sends vs to the Chirurgeon DIAL IX Verses 16. Therefore it is by faith that it might come by grace and the promise might bee sure to all the seed not to that onely which is of the law but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham who is the father of vs all Tim. WHat is the drift of this text Sil. To proue the former point that the promise of heauenly inheritance is ours by beleeuing and not by woorking the reasons to proue this are two First if the promise bee made vpon any other condition then beleeuing then it is not free but of debt Secondly the promise is not sure except it bee ours by beleeuing for there can be no certainty by workes of the law which we be not able to do perfectly Tim. What other thing is contained in this text Sil. A distribution of Abrahams seede into beleeuing Iewes and beleeuing Gentiles the former called his seede after the law because the law was giuen to the Iewes the other which be of Abrahams faith viz. beleeuing Gentiles Tim. What doth he speake of here when he saith it is Silas Hee speaketh of the heauenly inheritance promised to Abraham also he saith it is by faith to shew that the promise of the heauenly inheritance was giuen on condition that wee do beleeuc and that faith is the Instrument to receiue it and the manner of Scripture phrase is to attribute that vnto the instrument which is proper vnto the agent Tim. What is meant by this that It might come by Grace Silas We may vnderstand by Grace either the obiect of Faith that is Gods grace and mercie offered vnto vs in Christ which is the very thing that faith looketh vnto and leaneth vpon as the marke and stay of it or by grace may bee vnderstoode the scope and end of Faith which is the glory of Gods grace and fauour for it is much to the praise of Gods grace to forgiue sinners which beleeue in Christ without all consideration of merits Tim. What things did we learne from hence Silas These three things First that to attaine a benefit by Faith and to attaine it freely is all one Faith grace being so knit as one put the other is put and contrarywise Secondly that it is a Doctrine that tendeth directly to the glory of Gods grace to teach that righteousnesse and life commeth by Faith Thirdly that such as will haue heauen by merit of workes are enemies to Gods grace whatsoeuer pretence they haue to cloake their wickednesse yet he puls downe grace who buildeth merit Tim. What learne we by these words that the promise might be sure to all the seede Silas First that there is a mutual relation or reference betweene the promise and faith that is to say the promise is made that men should by faith lay holde on it and faith on the other side taketh to nothing but the promise Secondly we learne that Faith maketh beleeuers sure of their saluation because it leaneth vppon a sure and firme promise for it is the nature of faith to be sure and certaine yet it is the more firme and certaine because the promise which it beleeueth is firm and certaine like to God the promiser Tim. Were not the promise sure if it were giuen on condition to keepe the whole Law Silas No because of mans weaknesse which cannot keepe it as also because of the Gentiles which were not subiect to the Law and Ceremonies and therefore could not haue enioyed the promise of life if it had bin by the Law Tim. Tell vs is there any thing which may hinder this certainty of belieuers Silas Yea two things First doubt of perseuerance to the end which satan and the flesh do suggest to the godly This hinderance may be remoued first by praier which beeing made from faith for the guift of perseuerance it obtaineth it Secondly by the Meditation of Gods eternall loue and couenant that he will bee our God for euer ler. 31. 3 32. 40. and of Christes intercession which keepeth the beleeuers from salling away Ioh 17. The 2. hinderance is our manifold and great sins This hinderance may be remoued by considering that none can be without sinnes and that the best men haue foule ones who yet lost not the certainty and holde of the promise thereby because vppon repentance they were sorgiuen for Christ his sake Tim. But will not this certainty of Faith breede in vs carnall security Sil. No especially if these cautions be obserued First that we ground our certainty out of our selues vpon the infallible promise of God Secondly our certainty must be ioyned with feare of offending God as it is written Be not high minded but feare Rom. 11 20. Thirdly presumptuous sinnes are to be auoided Psal. 19 13. Fourthly
vs in our persons vnto the person of our mediatour who must do euery iot for vs therefore he saith it behooued him to fulfill all righteousnesse Math. 3. and that hee is the end of the law for righteousnes Rom. 10 and hath made vs iust by his obedience as in our text and became subiect to the law to redeeme vs which were obnoxious to the law Gal. 4 4. 5. And indeed seeing Christ himselfe was giuen vs and that he was borne for vs wrought miracles suffered death arose ascended c. how must not his life also be ours Againe is it not written that Christ was made our sanctification as well as our righteousnesse and our righteousnesse as well as our redemption 1 Cor. 1 30. Moreouer he that continueth not to doe all things contained in the law is accursed Deut. 27. last verse Where of it followes that if any wil auoyd the curse of the law he stands bound constantly from his conception till his death to keepe the law which forsomuch as none can do by himselfe therefore all the contents of the law must be accomplished by our surety or else no escaping the curse Besides if the actuall obedience of Adam made vs sinners howe should we be iust without the actuall obedience of Christ and it seemes that Christ should be but halfe a Sauiour only suffering and not doing things pleasant to his Father for vs. What meaneth that that Christ sanctified himselfe for vs Iohn 17. and who knowes not that it is written of Christ that hee came to doe his Fathers will Heb. 10. Whereas Scripture attributeth our saluation to his bloud that is a Synecdoche a part put for the whole likewise where iustification is placed in forgiuenesse of sins Rom. 4 5 6. and the bloud of Christ shedde beeing his chiefest obedience as it comprehends the rest that went afore so it excludeth onely legall sacrifices as not meritorious Tim. Is not this a speciall marke of a good Christian to follow the example of Christ his obedience in our doings and sufferings Sylas It is so hereby men are knowne to be Christians if after Christs example they doe indeuour to doe the will of God and not by their profession only which may be in an hypocrite Tim. Why doth hee say many shall bee made iust and not in the present time many are made iust Sylas Because this obedience is giuen to the elect at what time they shall liue in the world and beleeue DIAL XVI Verses 20 21. Moreouer the law entred thereuppon that the offence should abound neuerthelesse where sinne abounded there grace abounded much more That as sinne hath raygned to death so might grace also raygne by righteousnes vnto eternall lyfe through Iesus Christ our Lord. Tim. WHat doe these words contayne Sylas The Conclusion of the whole treatise of Iustification by faith Tim. What is the matter of the conclusion Sylas In the conclusion he doth meet withall and make answere to a secret obiection made in the behalfe of the law The obiection is this that if the obedience of Christ be our full righteousnes before God without the works of the lawe then to what end doth the law serue To which the Apostle doth first propound his answere barely verse 20. and nakedly that the law was giuen first to encrease our guiltinesse Secondly that the grace of Christ thereby becomes more glorious the which the Apostle doth enlarge by a comparison of contraries verse 21. sinne and death set against righteousnesse and life as contrarie one to the other the sum of which comparison is thus much that as sin preuailes to make all guilty of death so the righteousnesse of Christ beeing freely giuen to the beleeuers doth preuaile much more to make them partakers of eternall life Tim. Now expound the words what is meant by the Law Silas The morall Law contained in the ten commandements Tim. In what meaning is it said it entred thereuppon Sil. The Apostle meaneth that it came in and entred vpon Adams offence which had made vs guilty of death that wee might become more guilty Some expound and say it entred beside the promise of grace as the more principall doctrine Tim. Was this the purpose of God in giuing the Law to encrease our guiltinesse Silas No not so the Apostle doth not note the intention of God with what purpose he gaue it but the euent that did follow the giuing of the Law that thereby our offence did more abound Tim. In what respects is offence and sinne said to abound by the Law Silas In these respects First because a Law beeing giuen sinne was made more grieuous now by the breach of it Secondly sinne is more stirred vp and irritated by the Law our nature desiring the things that are forbidden it Thirdly the Law doth affoord vs a clearer sight and knowledge of our sinnes which were more manifested vnto vs by the Law as may bee made plaine vnto vs by these comparisons first of a Glasse which makes vs see the spots of our face what they be and how foule they bee Secondly of a Candell which doth discouer vnto vs the thinges in a Roome which lye out of order and could not be espied in the darke So by the law we come to vnderstand what our sinnes be and how greeuous they are Tim. Tell vs now what is meant by Grace Silas The fauour of God in the free forgiuenesse of all sinnes by the merite of Christ his obedience Tim. In what sense is it said that grace abounded Silas In respect of vs and of our knowledge for by the forgiuenesse of our many and great sinnes the mercy and fauour of God in Christ did appeare most manifestly vnto vs and is more fully and famously knowne Tim. By what similitude may this be declared vnto vs Silas Of a skilfull Surgeon or Physition who by curing and healing great and desperate wounds and diseases doth not get more skill but doe more manifest their skill which they had Secondly of a most kind Prince or father who by pardoning some great faults of their Children or subiects do so much the more make known their clemency and kindnes by how much their offence was more heynous in like manner the more and fouler the sinnes be which be forgiuen vs of God the more plentifully doth he declare his grace From whence we learne first that wonderfull is the wisedome and goodnesse of God that can turne such a thing as sinne is to the praise of his grace as Dauids fall Psal. 51 1. and Peters deniall Luke 22 32. Secondly it affoordeth a great comfort to great sinners so as they feele their sinnes beleeue in Christ for whatsoeuer their sinnes be there is mercy with God more then to counteruaile them grace in Christ is more able to saue then Adams sinne to condemne Thirdly God suffereth men to abound in sinne with a meaning not to destroy them therefore but to poure and shew forth his goodnesse more richly
the meanes of spirituall nourishment the flesh and bloud of Christ spiritually eate and drunke by faith Secondly by recreation to wit singing of psalmes with ioyfulnesse Thirdly by exercise of prayer repentance and good workes Fourthly by sleepe euen by meditation of the worde Law and Gospell Fifthly by phisicke and good vse of afflictions both vpon our selues and others Sixtly the auoyding of hinderances as namely of sinne euill company euill example euill counsell Psal. 1 1. and 26 and 119. Tim. What further instructions are we to take out of this 11. verse Sil. First the death and life of Christ is not for himselfe but for vs which beleeue in him therfore as Christ dyed and liued for vs so let vs thinke our selues bound to liue for the good of others Secondly whatsoeuer good thing beleeuers haue which concernes the spirituall and heauenly life they are beholden only vnto Christ therefore which must helpe vs first of all to beate down the pride of our heart and to make vs humble seeing we can neyther dye to sinne nor liue to God nor do the least good thing but through Christ. Secondly to quicken our loue and thankfulnesse more and more toward Christ by whom we haue all our grace and looke for al our glory To Christ therefore which hath sanctified vs and giuen vs fellowship with his death resurrection both for remission and for mortification of sinne bee thankes and praise for euermore Amen DIAL VI. Verse 12. Let not sinne raigne therefore in your mortall bodies that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text and what doth it containe Silas To perswade those which are sanctified not to suffer the grace of the Spirit to bee idle but to set it on worke for the suppressing of sinne which remaineth in our nature These wordes of our Apostle containe an exhortation to that purpose and heere beginneth the second part of this chapter the first part was doctrinall this latter part is paraeneticall or hortatory Tim. What be the parts of the exhortation contained in this 12. verse Silas Three First the substance of the exhortation Let not sinne raigne in you Secondly the reason why wee should not suffer sinne to raigne in these words Therefore and Mortall Thirdly the meanes how to hinder the kingdome of sinne By not obeying the lusts of sinne Tim. Now expound the words and tell vs what doe yee call Sinne Sil. The corruption and pronnesse of our nature to all euill this naturall corruption is heere called sinne first because it is the punishment of the sinne of our first parents Secondly the matter and cause roote and fountaine of all other sinnes Thirdly because it hath the proper nature of sinne Tim. How proue ye that it hath the proper nature of sinne Silas First it is the transgression of the Law Rom. 7 7. Secondly it striueth and rebelleth against the motions of the spirit Rom. 7 23. I see a law in my members rebelling c. Thirdly because it engendereth death which is the fruit of that which is properly sin Rom. 5 14. and 6 23. Tim. When may sin be sayd to raigne Sil. When the lusts and motions of sinne are confented vnto and followed without resistance or when it is done readily which sin willeth and commandeth to be done Tim. What is meant here by the body Sil. The whole man consisting of Soule and body now he doth rather name the body then the soule because sin is first conuayed into the soule by the body and afterward executed and fulfilled by the body as an organ to the soule in committing of sin Tim. What are the instructions that we are to learne from this exhortation thus expounded Sil. First though sin cannot but still be in the regenerate yet it ought and may be kept from raigning else this exhortation were vaine Secondly that it behooueth euery child of God to doe his part and endeuour that sinne may not raigne Thirdly where this care is not taken to resist sinne there it will raigne as a tyrant or rather as a King Tim. What reasons may stir vp Gods children to a care of hindering the kingdome of sinne so much as euer lyeth in them to doe Sil. First seeing Christ hath put into them the grace to mortifie their sin it is their part not to suffer it to bee idle vnfruitful but to labour more and more to keep vnder and maister that enemy which Christ hath already begun to slay and destroy Secondly because wee are mortall and subiect to death therefore our resistaunce of sin must be the stronger seeing it will shortly haue an end Thirdly if we striue against the kingdome of sin to hinder it we are sure to conquer it otherwise it will ouercome vs to our euerlasting shame and destruction Tim. But what needeth this exhortation to the faithfull in whome sinne cannot haue any kingdome because Christ is their King and ruleth them outwardly by his word and inwardly by his Spirit Sil. It is very needfull because by their owne care and endeuour in resisting sinne it is kept from exercising any rule or kingdome ouer them God who will not haue sin to rule in his children the same God willeth his children not to bee secure but to doe what they can to stoppe and hinder the power and course of sin in themselues GOD workes by meanes Tim. Tell vs now what is the speciall meanes to hinder the kingdome of sin Sil. Not to obey it in the lustes thereof whereby this word lust is meant not corruption of nature but the first stirrings thereof euen all the euill desires and motions that spring from it which may appeare to bee so by these reasons First because he doth distinguish sinne from lust as the roote and cause from the fruite and effect Secondly because he speaketh of lusts in the plurall number saying lustes and not lust this shewes that hee meant not naturall corruption which is one entire thing dispersed into the whole man but those diuers and many wicked motions and desires which come of it whereof wee may reade the particulars Rom. 1 29. 30. 1 Cor. 6. 9. 10. Gala. 5. 19. 20 21. Colos. 3. 5. and Titus 3 3. Such an heape sea or worlde of euill lusts there bee lurking in our nature as so many enemies to fight withall Tim. Now ye haue told vs what is meant by lusts tell vs what it is not to obey these lusst Sil. Neither to practise them in our workes nor somuch as to consent vnto them in our will with great watchfulnesse and continuall prayer to withstand all motions and occasions of sin Tim. What is the doctrine we learne from hence Sil. That such as will keepe sinne from raigning must keepe downe the first motions thereof which may be declared by these similitudes first of woundes and diseases in the body which being lookt vnto at
reprooue such as doe thinke euill thoughts to be free also such as know euill thoughts to be sinnes and yet labour not to bridle and mortifie them and lastly it confutes the Papists which affirme that lust because it is vnuoluntary and naturall is not sinne vntill it be consented to by the will till then it is but fomes peccati set ad agonem Tim. What further instruction may we obserue out of this present Text Silas That in elect persons baptized and by the Spirite effectually regenerated concupiscence doth remaine as a sinne and a vicious thing the reason is because of it is written Thou shalt not lust which shewes it to be sinne else it should not be forbid nor called by the name of sinne as it is often in this Chapter yea in Paul being regenerate as verse 17 not alone for that it is the effect of sinne as the writing is called ones hand or the cause of sinne as death is tearmed pale but for that it is properly and truely sinne being a Rebell against the gouernment of the Spirite in the minde of godly persons Chap 7 23. and causeth death which springeth onely from sinne properly taken Rom. 5 13 14 c. Indeed it is forgiuen the elect touching guilt but the fault and spot is not remoued as the Conscience of the holiest persons may and doe witnesse to them Whereto agreeth Augustines testimony Concupiscentiae reatus in Baptismo soluiter sed infirmit as manet again ad Iuliam Concupiscentia minui consumi non potest It is therefore a nouell error in the Romish Synagogue repugnant to Scripture and antiquity to teach that Concupiscence both for guilt and corruption is quite abolished in the regenerate by which error they extenuate sinne extoll mans nature and free wil and ability to keepe the commandements also diminish the benefit of Christ his grace lesson our prayers and thankfulnes to God and our diligence and care to purge out such a staine as Concupiscence is DIAL VI. Verses 8 9. But sinne tooke occasion by the commandement and wrought in me all manner of concupiscence for without the Law sinne is dead for I was once aliue without the law but when the c. Tim. VVHat is the summe and purpose of this Text with the seuerall parts of it Silas It doth deliuer vnto vs the second vse of the law in respect of men which are vnregenerate whose sinne is encreased and irritated by the Law through the prauity and corruption of nature taking occasion by the Law more to rebell against God The parts of this Text are two the first is a proposition in these words But sinne tooke occasion the second is a reason in these words for without the Law sinne is dead Tim. Now come to expound the words and tell vs what is meant by the word Sinne and by Commandement Silas By sinne is meant corruption of nature or that originall lust which is the roote of all other sins which is eyther in thought word or deed in omission or commission and by Commandement is meant that Commandement mentioned in the former verse which forbiddeth lust and that when it is truely known and duely considered Tim. In what meaning is it said that sinne tooke occasion by this Commandement Sil. This that the law in it owne nature is so far from being the cause of sinnes and transgressions as it doth not so much as yeeld or giue any occasion of sinning but mans corrupt nature being irritated prouoked and stirred vp by the prohibitions of the Law once manifestly knowne doth snatch and take occasion thereby to become more fierce and to breake out into more foule sins And this is it which is meant by the word Wrought for the meaning is that mans corrupt nature by the knowledge of the Law which condemneth it in stead of being amended thereby doth beget and bring foorth sin and sinfull desires more abundantly Euen as Riuers flow from a Fountain and sparkles arise out of a furnace so corrupted nature engendreth more wicked lusts the more it sees it is restrained by the Law Tim. What is the doctrine or instruction from hence Silas It sets before vs the woefull and wretched condition of mans nature such as it is before new birth which appeares in this that the Law which should serue to call men to God doth make them the more to flye from him and to runne away headlong vnto sinne and death For as stubborne diseases as the Canker or Leprosie which by laying too of remedies become the worse euen such is the lust of our sinfull hearts encreased by the remedy Also as an vntamed Horse which the more he is spurred forwards the more he goeth backeward and as a wicked sonne who being commanded a duty doth the more labour against it euen so it fareth with our corrupt mindes they giue themselues the more to doe euill the more they be forbidden them and this doth bewray the most vntoward disposition of our croo ked nature altogether before grace receiued aduerse and estranged from God and all goodnesse Tim. What vse and profit is to be made of this doctrine Sil. First it taketh the whole fault of our sins from the Law and layeth it where it ought to bee euen vpon the naughtines of our nature For the Law is no more to be blamed by becomming the occasion of so great many euils then a Physition is to be blamed if vpon the forbidding cold drink vnto a sick man the patient should more feruently thirst after it Secondly that there is nothing so good but it may becom the ocasion through our own default of grieuous euils as God his workes his benefits his iudgements his creatures yea his Gospel his Sonne prooueth a stone of stumbling and a rocke of offence Tim. What other vse of this former Doctrine Silas The exceeding vicious quality of our poisoned Nature should cause all men by all possible meanes to seeke to haue it renewed Secondly such as haue their Nature already cured and chaunged by the grace of new byrth must see that there is cause for them to bee humbled both in regard that they were once vnder the power of this poysoned corruption and haue still the remnants of it sticking in them and soliciting them to offend Thirdly it must admonish all which come to heare Gods word to heare it with feare and prayer that they be not made the worse by it through the fault of their owne wicked nature Tim. What is meant heere by Concupiscence Silas By Concupiscence is meant actuall lusts or euill desires both vnvoluntary and voluntary For it is plainly distinguished from sinne which is originall Concupiscence as fruite from the roote And by all manner of Concupiscence is meant all euil desires and motions of all kindes and sorts either against holinesse required in the first or righteousnesse commanded in the second Table of the Law Tim. Were not these
of Paul his owne purpose that he did preach to the Romanes but of GOD whose Calling must be expected Secondly a lesson not onely for Ministers of the Word but for all others that what is in ones power to do for others good and namely for them to whom wee are more especially indebted wee should not faile to do it and that to the vtmost of our power with a chearfull and prompt minde according to that councell giuen vs in Ecclesiastes Whatsoeuer is in thy hand to doo see thou do it with all diligence Eccles. 9 10 Lastly let vs learn by Pauls example First to ouercome any discouragements whatsoeuer by the consideration of our Calling Secondly the goodnesse of the thinges we haue in hand Thirdly the hope of great gaine and successe by our labours DIAL VII Verse 16. For I am not ashamed of the Gospel of Christ for it is the power of God vnto Saluation to euery one that beleeueth to the Iew first and also to the Grecian Tim. WHat is the sum of thu Scripture Silas That we ought to glorie in the Gospel because thereby God is truly powerfull to saue all that beleeue it Heere doth end the holy Apostles 〈◊〉 and his Tract of Iustification by Faith beginneth at the 16. verse where he entereth vpon the Treatise by a Prolepsis making answere to a secret Obiection For Paul hauing written in the latter end of the 15. verse I hat he was readie to preach the Gospell at Rome it might be obiected vnto him the Gospell is euery where spoken against the Precepts therof be scorned and thy selfe accounted little lesse then mad which thinkest to teach the wise more wised ome by the Gospell To which the Apostle answereth ptofessing that He is not ashamed of the Gospell though it seeme neuer so contemptible and base vnto the worlde Whereof hee rendereth two reasons One because it is not his owne Gospell but of Christ as Author and concerning no friuolous or fruitlesse matter Christ as Matter Subiect The second from the Fort and 〈◊〉 thereof because it is a most healthfull and powerfull Organe or Instrument of 〈◊〉 to saue beleeuers So as this Text consisteth of two parts First a profession I am not ashamed Secondly a Reason For. And whereas he saith He is not ashamed it is a Liptote or Meiosis because more is meant then is spoken For it is as if hee had saide I am so farre from being ashamed and I do glory and reioyce in it so as I esteeme nothing so honourable Insinuating to the Romanes that they ought likewise so to do as he their Apostle did according to that which he spake plainly and without any figure vnto the Galathians Chap. 6 14. Now when he tearmeth the Gospell 1. the Doctrine of free Iustification by Christ the power of God he meaneth not of his Creating power or his reuenging power vnto destruction but of a power ioyned with fauour and loue for saluation not of his Essentiall power but of his Organicall Ministerial power or by a 〈◊〉 of the declaration of his power when it is manifested in the preaching of the Gospell to make it effectuall For by the Gospell God mightilie moueth the hearts of the elect when the houre of their conuersion commeth infusing the Holy-ghost which stirreth vp the vnbeleeuing heart and makes it able to beleeue whereby righteousnesse and saluation is obtained thorow Christ. Tim. What is the profession made in this present Verse Si. That Paul is not ashamed of the Gospell howsoeuer for in all Ages since the Gospell did first come abroad manie haue bin ashamed of it from the shame which accompanieth it haue they forsaken it or coldly professed it Yet Paul professeth that for no cause wold he be ashamed thereof A Confession worthy of such an Apostle Tim. How many wayes may we be ashamed of the Gospell of Christ Silas Two wayes especially First if we be ashamed of the Doctrine or duties of the Gospell or secondly of the Preachers and professors of it Tim. What things vsually make men ashamed of the Gospell Sil. Foure things First the strangenesse of the Doctrine being aboue naturall reason Secondly the simplicity and meannesse of the Gospell being without earthly pompe and glory Thirdly the troubles and crosses of such as are the Disciples and hearers of the Gospell Fourthly the plainenesse of the Gospell being voide of humane wisedome and excellency of words From whence we may obserue that great is the corruption of mans hart which is not ashamed of things shamefull and yet doe shame at things wherein they ought to glory Tim. What reasons should preserue vs from being ashamed of the Gospell Sil. Fiue First the example of Paul such an Apostle which had abid much shame for the Gospell and yet saw no cause to be ashamed of it Secondly the Nature of the Gospell being a gladsome and ioyfull message Thirdly the subiect of the Gospell which is Christ of whom if we be ashamed before men he will be ashamed of vs before God Fourthly because it is the Instrument of Gods power to beget Faith Fiftly the effect of the Gospell which is saluation the greatest of all benefits or rather it hath all safety in it comprehending deliuerances of all sorts both Temperall and Spirituall For whereas there be sundry and many kinds of saluations or safeties as of our goods and persons by good lawes and iust Magistrates against sicknesle and diseases by Phisitions and wholesome medecines from violence and iniuries of enemies by valiant Captaines and Souldiors from extremity of weather by builders of houses or Masons from colde by Garments as all these enemies dangers effects and 〈◊〉 came by sinne and be effects of transgression so our deliuerance and safety from them is a fruit of Christ his redemption and of that faith which embraceth it but heere is chiefely meant that saluation which is spirituall and is of the soule from sinne and eternall death whereof there be two parts the first part is deliuerance from guilt and punishment of sinne by remission the second is blessednesse and eternall life in the possession of Gods fauour and loue whereof there be three degrees First in this life at the time of regeneration when sinne being pardoned through Faith and the soule renewed by the Holy-Ghost it beginneth to liue that life which is eternall The second at death when the Soule seuered from the body is receiued into Abrahams bosome to rest in heauen with the Spuits of iust men The third at the day of Resurrection when the whole man shall be glorified with Christ euerlastingly This is that Saluation whereunto the Gospell bringeth the embracers of it Moreouer whereas it is preached to some vnto destruction it happeneth by the infidelity of men For the Gospell of it owne Nature and by the counsell of God is appointed to bee cause of Saluation Wherein it diftereth from the Law whose effect is to reueale wrath for sinne not to iustify and
Secondly that they violated the Law of nature in respect of duties to God and Men by vngodlinesse and vnrighteousnesse Thirdly that they were punished of God mightily Wrath from Heauen Tim. Begin with that part ye named last because it is first mentioned in the Text. What is meant by Wrath is there any such passion of anger and wrath in God Tim. In holy Scriptures Wrath Anger bee otherwise attributed vnto men then vnto God For it is in men properly as it is a perturbation of the minde inflaming or stirring vp to Reuenge Wrath in his proper acception is an appetite or desire of reuenge for some contempt or hurt done or supposed to be done to our selues or others whom we affect When men see themselues neglected or wronged straight way they are moued to take vengeance on the party thus it is in Men the truth whereof appeareth in Came Esau Achab c. whereas in God wrath is no affection but a iust act of God punishing wickednesse or the punishments themselues of warre famine pestilence sicknesse c. inslicted for iniquity so it is vsed in this Text. For it is here set against righteousnesse of God spoken of verse 17 which as wee haue saide signifieth both his mercifull goodnesse freely bestowing Iustice and life eternall vpon beleeuers and also Iustice or life giuen and bestowed graciously Therefore by wrath we must vnderstand both his indignation reuenging impiety and the Reuenge or paines themselues according to the Hebrew phrase Now this wrath is saide to be Reuealed that is to be declared by examples and by experience testified For howsoeuer sundry wayes Gods wrath bee Reuealed against sinne as by the light of nature euerie mans Conscience naturally accusing and tormenting him for euill doing Rom. 2. Secondly by the Gospell whose voice is not only Consolatory speaking pardon and life vnto beleeuing offenders but Comminatorie threatning death eternal to impenitent persons and vnbeleeuers as Mat. 3 10. Luke 13 3. Ioh. 3 18 36. Thirdly by the Law whose office is to reueale wrath and the curse against euery transgression Deut. 27. v. last Rom. 4 15. yet our present text would bee taken of that daily experience which witnesseth that God is wrathfullie displeased with the worlde for sinne and euen at that time when the Apostle wrote there were greeuous miseries of sword plague and famine abroad in the world Also it is plain by the verses following that Paul speaks of such iudgements as God had executed vpon all men for contempt of his Maiesty especially of spirituall punishments in hardning mens hearts and giuing them vp to vile lusts and a Reprobate mind Verse 24 28. Tim. What Learne we from hence Sil. Seeing sin prouoketh Diuine wrath it is necessary to take heed of it Secondly that this wrath appeareth most in spiritual Iudgements because they not only are tokens of wrath but deserue more wrath they are punnishments for sins past and encrease of more sinne Tim. What thinke ye that the Children of God haue their parts in Spirituall Iudgements Silas Yea as appeareth in the example of Adam Dauid Salomon and of many in our dayes which haue faln into some fits of dispaire also haue had the sinne punnished by Sinne as Paul affirmeth heere of the Idolatrous Gentiles Tim. In what sence may it be said that this wrath of God was reuealed From Heauen Sil. Howsoeuer men very learned and not a few haue drawne the sense of these words vnto the Heauens themselues which be instruments of wrath against such as contemne their maker as Ambrose some to the euill spirits which are aboue in the ayre to vexe by Gods appointment wicked liuers as Origen some to the second comming of Christ from Heauen to iudge the world as Theophylact others referre this to the vniuersality and large extent of his iudgements which were and shall be vpon all men vnder Heauen that do wickedly and on others to the euident declaration of his iudgement from Heauen as from an high and eminent place that they might bee most apparant vngainsayable as Martyr Beza Faius do think yet the best and fittest sense is by a 〈◊〉 to expound Heauen for God as Luke 20 5 15 18. and to oppose it vnto the fancy and opinion of Atheists Epicures and other prophane men which ascribe the punishmens that happen vnto men vnto chance and misfortune or to the malice of men or vnto the malignity of the starres and Elements or other inferior causes passing by the iustice of God and denying his prouidence in the gouernment of the world against which Paul affirmeth heere that the euils which be are scourges sent from God who though he may vse ordinary and naturall meanes for the plaguing of men yet himselfe is author ruler as it is euery where in Scripture testified of him that no euil cōmeth but frō him as in Amos that he createth darkenesse in Esay that hee sendeth the sword c. in Leuit. that hee rained Fire and Brimstone from Heauen on Sodom in Gene that he drowned Pharaoh in Exod. Finally it is God which deliuereth vp to vncleannesse and a Reprobate mind in this Chapter verse 24 28. The Doctrine hence is this that punnishments come from God as effects of his Iustice against sinne The duties whereunto it should prouoke men be First to beware of murmuring in time of calamity for this is to fight Gyant-like against God Secondly to be patient and contented because it is Gods doing for iust ends this is to submit vnto God Thirdly to sue and seeke first and principally vnto God for remouing calamities as Israelites in Iudges Nininuites in Ionas did Tim. What may we learne from this that wrath is saide to bee reuealed against all vngodlinesse and vnrighteousnesse of men Sil. Two things First by the order of words we learn that the breach of the first Table is more grieuous then the breach of the second Table Secondly seeing it is against all therefore there is no sinne how little soeuer that can escape punishment Thirdly by vsing the abstract rather then the contrete we learne that Gods anger is not against men themselues but against their wicked deeds principally Tim. Whereof did this admonish vs Sil. To make conscience of small sinnes Secondly it reproueth such as thinke themselues safe because they haue no great sinnes whereas vengeance is due to euery disobedience Tim. What is heere meant by Truth Sil. The remainder of light which since the fall of Adam is in euery mans Conscience to shew him what God is most good bounteous iust and mighty how he is to be worshipped by louing and fearing him aboue all and what is right and what is wrong what good and what euill for these things euen naturall light doth teach euery man Tim. What is the nature of this truth Sil. It delighteth and desireth to expresse it selfe that is it would come forth and appeare in our workes it abhorreth to be smothered and imprisoned
vncleannesse with beasts Sodomitry which is an vncleannesse betweene them of one sexe Tim. Why is it called Sodomitry Silas Because the Sodomites are the first we reade to haue committed this sinne also they were outragious in the committing of it Gen. 19 4. 5 6 7 c. Tim. When be sayde they receyued such recompence as was meet what was this to say Silas That God did punish dolaters to shew his iustice and he did it with a fit punishment to shewe his wisedome This place plainly proueth that in sin there is something which God worketh and not suffereth only Sinne hath three things in it First a motion or action on which as it is such is of God in whom we all moue and liue and haue our being Secondly the naughtines of the action 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this is from our selues Satan not from God as a Waggoner when he strikes a lame horse is cause of his moouing but not of his halting which commeth from imperfection in the beast The third thing is Anti-iustice the recompence or retribution for former offences this is from God as Author for it is iust with God to render to men after their workes good to them which do good and euill to such as do euill here we haue the end wherefore God deliuereth to vacleane and vile lusts that by order of Iustice he may repay sinners their due Tim. If there be a diuine Iustice then it must needes bee ill with wicked men and wel with good Silas True it must be so for so Iustice requires which giueth to euery man his due but because this doth not alwaies appear to be so this proues that there is a iudgment to come 2 Thes. 1 4 5 6. Tim. What learne we by this Silas That it behooueth all men to feare sinne especially not to lye in any sinne because there is a most wise and iust God to reckon with vs. Tim. What are wee taught by the fitnesse and meetenesse of this punishment Silas That there is infinite wisedome in God to allot paine and iudgement answerable and like to their sin This should serue to encrease the feare of offending God who knoweth how to fit sinners their payment correspondent to their fault and to proportion the punishment to the sinne drowning Pharaoh in Water who caused the Israelitish Children to be drowned and striking that hand of Ieroboam where with he would haue stricken the Lords Prophet And worthily giuing vp these Idolatrous Heathens to dishonor their own selues with most base lusts and deeds because they had dishonoured God by giuing his Godhead and worship to most base ignominious creatures DIAL XVI Verses 28 29. For as they regarded not to acknowledge God euen so God deliuered them vp to a Reprobate minde to do these thinges which are not conuenient being full of all vnrighteousnes fornication wickednesse couetousnesse maliciousnesse Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text Silas Generally to conuict their guiltinesse and to shew what need they had of the grace of Christ but especially to lay foorth the equity of Gods iudgement against Idolaters The equity of God is this that as they did not iudge it right to render vnto God his knowne worst ip so God in his Iustice tooke all Iudgement from them that they should not know what was conuenient and good for themselues nor equall and rightfull toward their neighbor as henceforth he sheweth at large Tim. What is meant heereby That they did not acknovvledge God Sil. Two things First that they had not God before their eyes Secondly that they thought God had nothing to do with their matters for they neglected God and ran into his displeasure being led to do euill by forgetting God to bee witnesse and iudge of all men Moreouer that they neglected God yea and derided the true knowledge of God preferring their owne inuentions and so their sin was not of simple ignorance but of wilfull blindnesse Tim. What lesson was giuen vs heere Sil. That it is a good meanes to preserue vs in well doing if we consider that Gods eye is euer vpon vs to note and obserue vs and our doings and that it is a grieuous fault to scorne the true knowledge of God Tim. What is heere meant by a Reprobate minde Sil. Not persons reiected and reprobate of God for diuers of these were elect ones but such a minde as is destiture of iudgement and voide of common reason taking euill for good and good for euill also passiuely a minde reproued and disallowed both of God and all good men Tim. Doe ye not thinke some elect to be sometimes of a Reprobate mind Sil. Yes surely before their calling as Paul Manasses and the Theese vpon the Crosse and they spoken of 1 Cor 6 11. also diuers Reprobates were neuer giuen vp to a Reprobate mind but contrariwise some of them haue had a Ciuill mind guiding their actions according to reason together with great shew of godlinesse for a time as Iehu 1 Kings 10 29. and Demas 2 Tim. 4 10. and Iudas Math. 26. Tim. What should this teach vs Sil. Charity to hope well of all Secondly patience to beare with all men in the spirit of lenity so long as there is any cause of hope Thirdly wisedome to discerne of mens mindes by their workes and actions Tim. What difference do ye put betweene a Reprobate mind a Ciuill mind and a Religious mind Sil. The Reprobate mind doth neither feare God nor reuerence man and regardeth neither right nor wrong The Ciuill mind regardeth man but doth not reuerence God The Religious mind both feareth God and reuerenceth man dooing good and auoyding euill of Conscience toward the commandements of God Tim. What learned we from the particuler rehearsall of those sinnes and transgressions where-vnto they were giuen vp by the reuenging hand of Gods iustice flinging them as it were from an high Rocke into a deepe downefall and pit of vices Silas Three things First how corrupt and miserable mans nature is without Christ being a very sinke and Sea rather of most vgly loathsome sinnes and vices Secondly we learne how many enemies we haue to fight against euen so many as there be corrupt lustes Thirdly how much we are beholding to Christ for pardon of sinne and grace of new birth whereby so foule and inumerable vices are couered and cured Fourthly we may learne to detest all appearance of Idolatry which God doth so seuerely punish by giuing vp to such filthy sinnes as so many Tormentors Tim. What was noted heereby that they are saide to be full of all vnrighteousnesse the first effect and fruit of their reprobate mind Sil. That corruption is spread into and ouer the whole nature of all men before their conuersion Secondly that our life is thereby stuffed and ouer-laden or fraught with vices of all sorts which arise and spring out of that Fountaine of naturall corruption Tim. What is meant by vnrighteousnesse Sil. Not a peculiar
the example of our first Parents whose marriage God their Father made Secondly by the example of Isaac Iacob Sampson who were ruled by their Parents in their matches Thirdly by 1. Cor. 7. Fourthly Children are more in power of their Parents then their other goods Fiftly by the Law of Vowes Num. 30 4 5. for if a promise made of a Childe to God is of no force when parents dissent much more may parents breake the promise which their children shall make of themselues to other men Lastly Marriages made without consent of Parents are against the Law of Nature and of the Lord are commonly accursed of God Tim. For what reasons is disobedience to parents to be loathed of all Christians Silas First it is against the fift commandement which saith honour them Ephes. 6 1. Secondly it is against the Instruments of our life education and learning Thirdly it is against thē which bear the image of Gods authority Fourthly it bringeth many curses as short life to disobedient Children Hee that despiseth his Mother saith the Wise man the Rauens shal pick out his eyes Prou. 30 17. Also Absolon came to a fearfull end being a disobedient Childe DIAL XX. Verse 30. Without vnderstanding Couenant-breakers without naturall affection such as can neuer be appeased Mercilesse Tim. WHat do yee meane by those that are vvithout vnderstanding Sil. Such as haue vnderstanding and cannot vse it but deale as men voide of reason and counsell vnaduisedly and headstrongly following their passions These men breake the rule of the word which chargeth vs to walk wisely Secondly they are vnlike vnto God who doth all his things by wisedome and counsell Thirdly they purchase much woe to themselues thorough their foolish and rash dealing Fourthly they disgrace their persons their actions and oftentimes their profession through foolishnesse Tim. What Lesson was then giuen heere Sil. That wee vndertake nothing without good and due deliberation Establish thy thoughts by counsell sayeth Salomon in his Booke of Prouerbes Tim. Who are these Couenant-breakers Sil. They who will abide by no Couenants Leagues or promises further then it is to serue their turn These men they are vnlike to God who is faithfull in all his promises Secondly they shal neuer come into the lords Tabernacle Psal. 15 1. Thirdly they are enemies to humane society the band whereof is fidelitie and truth Fourthly they bring forth a fruite of the flesh Gal. 5 20. and breake the Law in a maine point Math. 23 23. vnder these be meant all which deny things committed to their trust or deceiue trust put in them Tim. How many manner of Couenants be there Silas Two Religious and Ciuil Of ciuil Couenants there be two sorts First publicke for publicke duties in respect of a place Secondly for priuate duties in respect of priuate Callings Tim. How else deuide ye couenants Sil. Nationall betweene Countries personall betwixt particular persons Tim. What do ye call naturall affections Sil. Such as be amongst them of one bloud and kindred as betweene parents and children husbands and wiues kindred countrey heathens yea Christians also voyde of these Tim. What doth it differ from humane and Christian affection Sil. Humane affection is that whereby wee embrace all men as men naturall affection is that whereby wee imbrace them which are neere vnto vs by bloud Christian affection is that whereby we loue good men because they belong to Christ. Tim. Who are they that can neuer be appeased Sil. Such as being once offended will neuer bee reconciled againe also such as can agree with none nor brook the conditions of others these men they are contrary to God who is ready to bee appeased Secondly they make God their enimie who hateth such as are enimies to peace yea reiecteth all their seruice done to him as abhominable See Math. 5. 23. 24. 25. Tim. Who are mercilesse men Sil. Such as cannot pitty any man but are cruell fierce hard-hearted Tim. What reasons to driue vs from mercilesnes Sil. First it is against Gods commandement and nature Secondly it maketh men also to bee mercilesse to vs because wee cannot pitty them that are in misery the Heathers were full of cruelties as also the Turks in their wars shedding the bloud of men women and children without all pitty casting men to beastes and causing men to kill one another at sword playing Concerning the forenamed sins which are 23. in number we are generally to obserue these few and short notes First that he first setteth downe one worde vnrighteousnesle which comprehends them that follow as kindes and parts of vnrighteousnes Secondly that they are here to be considered not simply as sinnes or causes of sinnes but as effects and punishments springing from the root of Idolatry Thirdly that he nameth not all the branches of iniustice to men see more Gal. 5. 19. 20. Col. 2 8. but the most principall and such as then reigned most amongst the Heathens Fourthly that though an imputation bee here laid vpon al the Heathen who are vniuersally blamed without exception because few among them liued ciuilly and all were by nature giuen to them yet no doubt all were not alike guilty and further howsoeuer all these sins were not found in euery one yet all were guilty of some one or more of them Moreouer he doeth accuse the Romanes directly to bee faulty in these transgressions but indirectly framing his speech vnder the persons of others to decline enuy letting them rather see in the mirrour of other mens liues what themselues were by nature then plainly charging them to do such things Lastly there is a great difference betweene godly Christians and prophane Heathens in respect of these vices which howsoeuer Gods regenerate children may fall into some of them of frailty and by strength of temptation yet they are not giuen wholy and for euer ouer vnto any of them nor bee full fraught with them DIAL XXI Verse 31. Which men though they know the Lawe of God howe that they which commit such things are worthy of death not onely doe them but fauour them that doe them Tim. WHat is the purpose of this Text Sil. To she we the wickednesse of mens hearts how far it goes where it is not restrayned that is not onely to doe great euils but to like praise them who are euill doers wherein he doth more amplifie their guiltines because they were not onely committers of euill but sauourers thereof Tim. What is meant by the iudgement of God and how did the Gentiles know it whence 〈◊〉 they their knowledge of it Sil. By iudgement or righteousnesse of God the morall law often commandements is not vnderstoode because this was neuer giuen but to the Iewes and that which hee speakes of death declares that it must bee expounded of the iudiciarie or coectiue and correcting power of God whereby he doth repay good to them which do good and euill to them who do euill life to the righteous death to the sinners This
iudiciary law is called iudgement or iustice because by the immutable order of iustice it is requisite that rewards and paines be repaied to men as recompence of their workes It is tearmed the iudgement of God because it doth not belong to God as a contingent effect of his free will which he may doe or not do as he will but as a naturall attribute is in God and by him vnchangeably expressed and executed 2. Thes. 1 6 7. Whereas the Gentiles are saide to know this iudgement the meaning is that they well vnderstood the law and iudgement of God to allot death to them which did such crimes and that vnto such crimes death did so firmely and necessarily cleaue by Gods iudgment as whether God did inflict or for some time spared yet the doers of such things were worthy of death that is some kind of punishment tending to destruction euen of Hels destruction the Gentiles were not altogether ignorant as by Virgil and other Poets may be collected This iustice of God the Heathens knew by light of Nature Secondly by witnesse of their owne Conscience and by experience in the daily examples of diuine reuenge Hence Draco appointed death to the breakers of his lawes and Gentiles iudged Adulterers vnto death Gen. 38 24. Also the Barbarians Acts 28 4 bewray murtherers worthy to dye in their iudgement Tim. What death are they worthy of which doe such things against the Law of God imprinted first in mans minde then written in Tables of Stone Silas Both naturall death violent death and death eternall this eternal death standeth in a separation from God and in a sense of paine-full torments in body and soule it is to be suffered in Hell a Prison a Lake a place of darkenesse a depth in the company of the Diuell wicked Angels and Reprobate men and for euer without end infinitely without measure Tim. How is this paine and smart of this death shaddowed out in Scripture Silas By the similitude of fire and Brimstone the effects of this paine be weeping howling and gnashing of teeth this paine shall endure as long as God endureth euen euerlastingly Tim. What vse is to be made of this description Sil. First it should humble vs much to think that we deserue such an vnhappy condition Secondly it should make vs flye from sinne that hath pulled it vpon vs. Thirdly it should stirre vp a loue to 〈◊〉 Christ that hath himselfe suffered the paines of this death to free vs from it Fourthly it should moue in vs great pittie towards such as do lye in sin and be in the Highway vnto this death Lastly it should breed great carefulnesse to keepe others from sinning Tim. What sinnes are chiefely to be auoyded of vs Christians Sil. Sinnes against our knowledge because they giue greatest wounds to our conscience and so most trouble the peace of our owne hearts Secondly they draw after them the greatest downefall in this world which is the sinne against the Holy-ghost Thirdly they procure greatest wrath and punishment after this life Lastly they haue in them slat contempt and Rebellion against God Tim. May not Gods Children sinne after their knowledge Sil. They may and do as appeareth by Dauids praier Psal. 19 13. and practise Psal. 51. Also by the example of Adam Manasses Solomon and Peter but in these sinnes the godly differ much from the wicked for the godly fall into these sinnes seldom with a strife of heart against them in the doing and great griefe of heart afterwards as also encrease of care and watchfulnesse against new temptation but none of these things bee in the wicked but the quite contrary for they run headlongly and wilfully into euill and are without remorse and returning to God Tim. What is it to fauour those that do euill Sil. To consent vnto their wicked deeds with approbation this may be done many waies as by praising by counselling and perswasions by hiring and rewarding by defending by dispensing by pardoning or procuring pardons by concealing and hiding and by pleading for them also by silence and not reproouing or not punishing all these worthy of death Tim. How may their fault bee set out which fauour euill doers Sil. By the example of Arch-rebels which wil maintaine all that rise vp against their Prince This is an high pitch and degree of sinne and in a very dangerous case they stand who be risen to this height of iniquity especially in this light of the Gospell CHAP. II. DIALOGVE I. Verse 1. ¶ Thou therefore art inexcusable O Man whatsoeuer thou art that iudgest for in that same wherein thou iudgest another thou condemnest thy selfe for thou that iudgest doest euen the selfe same things Tim. WHat is the purpose of this Text Silas The general purpose is to shew the guiltinesse of the Gentiles but especially to discouer reprooue a close kinde of sinners who tooke themselues to be righteous without fault because they reproued others and could not themselues be blamed of the world these sinners the Apostle telleth them that it is little helpe to them that the world cannot iudge them seeing they are iudged of their own Conscience and of God The text hath a reproofe in the first words Secondly a reason in the rest Tim. This indeed is the commonly receined opinion that the Apostle hauing in the latter end of the former Chapter reproued and conuicted open and bold offenders doth now in the beginning of this Chapter blame another kinde of trespassers amongst the Gentiles which were more polliticke and sinned with more cuning neither doing openly nor allowing such grosse crimes as were mentioned before but taxing and condemning them both morally by precepts as did Cato Socrates c. and ciutlly by their lawes as Solon Lycurgus Draco c. Yet in secret and priuately did the same things Some also there be which thinke that Paul hauing reprehended such as abused their contemplatine knowledge and contrary there vnto bad run into foule Idolatry against the first Table now taxeth such as abuse their practicke knowledge trespassing against their neighbours contrary to the knowne rules of common equity but what doe you thinke of the connexion of this Chapter with the former Sil. The first Particle of this Text Therefore doth well cleare it to me that this whole sentence is inferred and dependeth vpon the former words in the last verse of the precedent Chapter so as he doth not take vp a reprehension of a new sort of sinners but goeth on still to conuict the same transgrcssors but with a new 〈◊〉 Hitherto he hath reasoned from the effect of euill workes done by the Gentiles against God and men to wit the wrath and punishment of God reuealed and executed vpon them whereof it followeth strongly that the Heathen by their works deseruing damnation could not thereby challenge Iustification Heere he argueth and concludeth the same thing from a Testimony or iudgement of euery mans owne Conscience not from that particular morall iudgement
worke done so doth not the Hypocrite he looks to the act onely being carelesse of affection The one doth rather desire to be then to seeme to be the Hypocrite is quite contrary The one cleaueth to the Lord with purpose of heart the other is wauering and vnstable The one is led to good or to shun euill with regard of fauour or feare the other that hee may please God The one complaineth of his infirmity rather then hee will praise his good deedes the other delighteth to heare of his owne good doings The one saith little doth much the other doeth little and talketh much The one doeth cloake bad actions with good pretences so will not the other Tim. What further obseruations and instructions from this Text Silas First vpon this text is grounded the distinction of the inward and outward Sacrament Also of the visible and inuisible Church Secondly that as euerie Sacrament hath a Signe and a thing signified so these two are euer ioyned in the right vse of the Sacrament the one taken outwardly by the sense the other inwardly receiued by the spirit Lastly that grace is not tied vnto the Sacrament which some haue without grace and the benefites promised the thing of the Sacrament is separate from the signe vnto all beleeuers CHAP. III. DIALOGVE I. Verse 1 2. 1. What is the preferment of the Iew or what is the profit of Circumcision 2. Much euery way because vnto them of trust was committed the Oracles of God Timotheus IN few wordes lay downe the sum and order of this third Chapter Sil. The Apostle stil goeth on to proue the Iewes to be guilty thorough sinne of Gods wrath that whatsoeuer prerogatiues they had on Gods part to grace them yet because of their vnbeliefe and other transgressions they were no more iust before God then the sinfull Gentiles as he confirmeth by sundry authorities diuine out of the Prophets and Psalmes whereuppon hee inferreth that by the workes of the Law none be iustified in the sight of God and so at last concludeth demonstratiuely the maine and principall proposition of this Epistle that all elect sinners bee they Iewes or Gentiles are iustified without the workes of the Law by the faith of Christ. Touching the generall parts of this Chapter they bee these three First is a confutation of diuers cauils and calumnious Obiections which the Iewes might mooue on their owne behalfe out of such thinges as Paul had written vntill verse 9. The second from the 9. Verse vnto the 21. wherein he both propoundeth proueth the quality both of Iew and Gentiles in the case of sin and damnation In the third and last part he inferreth and by vnanswerable reasons demonstrateth this affirmatiue proposition All men bee iustified by faith from verse 21. till the end of the Chapter Tim. What is the drift of this present Text Silas To bring the Iewes the better to the sight of their owne sins and wretchednesse by answering such things as they obiected for their owne defence For it might trouble them which the Apostle wisely foresaw to heare Paul so extenuate Circumcision and other priuiledges Tim. What is the first Obiection and how doth the Apostle answere it Sil. The Obiection is this If notwithstanding Circumcision yet the Iew and Gentile be alike sinners and miserable wherein then is the preferment of the Iew in what doth he excell the Gentile For it were absurd and iniurious vnto God himselfe to equall the Gentile vnto the Iew. To which the Apostle so answeareth as leauing them equall for guilt of sinne yet he giueth to the Iew his prerogatiue Tim. What be the parts of this Text Sil. Two First a question in the first verse Secondly an answer in the second verse Tim. What learned we out of the Question Silas Three things First how hard a thing it is to bring men to yeelde to their owne conuiction and condemnation Secondly that men naturally do affect excellencie to bee thought better then others Thirdlie that such Ceremonies as men are accustomed to they cannot abide to haue them reproued And adde this as a fourth That Preachers must wisely preuent and remoue what may be scrupulous to the weake or occasion of slander vnto the malicious persons Tim. What did we learne of the answere Silas The Wisedome of the Apostle who in reporting the preferment of the Iewes doth not onely stand vpon the vertues of the Iewes but-onely reckons such things as were meete and belonged to God being his benefits least they should be proud For he doth point at many things in that hee saith Much euery way yet mentioned onely the Oracles of God as the chiefest of his sauours which is signified by the word First noting not an order but the dignitie of this priuiledge as generall containing the rest and most excellent surpassing the rest Tim. Whence did he setch this word Oracles Silas From the Gentiles who vse to cal the answers which were giuen by Apollo at Delphos by the name of Oracle Tim. What did this teach Sil. That wee should not put Religion in wordes when wee may vse them without any wrong vnto the truth Tim. What is meant heere by the Oracles of God Silas All the Scriptures of the Old Testament both Moysaicall and Propheticall but especially the free promises of grace and saluation by Christ. These Oracles were committed to the Iewes not as another mans thing laide to pledge but as their owne treasure to be enioyed for their vse to instruct and comfort them if they could haue vsed it well Howbeit thorough their owne fault they serued not to this end and so they lost the right of this prerogatiue so as it nothing profited them Tim. What instructions were giuen from hence Sil. Three that to haue the word of God amongst vs is the greatest priuiledge and sauour that God giueth to any people because hereby Gods counsell for our saluation is reuealed and men are called to the kingdome of heauen and to other fauours concerning the life to come therefore we ought to esteeme and loue the worde aboue all other things because God will not let the contempt of such a precious treasure goe without reuenge Secondly wee learne that it is a signe that God maketh high account of that people to whome hee doth of trust commit his worde which should woorke in vs great care of thankfulnesse to God with study and an earnest desire of pleasing him Thirdly wee learne that the office of the Church toward the word is to be a keeper of it for it is of trust committed to vs as a iewell to be kept the duty of the Church herein doeth consist in foure particulars First to interprete and giue the true sence of the worde Secondly to seuer it from all false and bastard Scriptures Thirdly to propound foundly the doctrine of the worde to the Children of the Church Fourthly to preserue the doctrine vncorrupt and to punish such as depraue it and herein the
turned ouer to the Iustice of God For if men once come to this passe to bee cauillers against the knowne truth there is little hope of them their iudgement is peruerted and their heart filled with pride and obstinacy therefore to be auoided as Dogs or Swine DIAL VI. Verse 9 10. What then are we better then they No in no wise For wee haue before accused both Iew and Gentile that they are all vnder sinne as it is written There is none righteous no not one Tim. WHat is the drift of this Text Silas To prooue all men whether Iew or Gentile to bee alike sinners by the testimony of Scripture The words haue first an Obiection in the person of the Iewes Secondly the answer of Paul which takes from them occasion of glorying too much in their Auncestors Tim. What learne wee heereby that Paul putteth himselfe in the same ranke of sinners Silas The wisedome that ought to bee in Teachers by all meanes to mollifie their reprehension of sinners and namely by taking in themselues when they may do it with truth Secondly that there is amongst men a communion or incorporation of sinne Tim. Is not this contrary to the first verse where he saith the Iewes were better then the Gentiles And now he makes them both equall Iew no better then Gentile Tim. No for there he meaneth that the Iewes were better in respect of God and his benefits vppon them heere he maketh them equall in respect of naturall corruption beeing alike sinners by nature the Iewes had a preferment of fauour to be Gods peculiar people to haue his Law and Prophets but concerning their manner of iustification before God by faith not by works it was all one to Iew and Gentiles all being sinners Tim. What did he meane by all being vnder sinne Silas That all men are vnder the guilt and punishment of sinne which is a matter of such daunger as it were better to haue the whole weight of the world vpon vs then to bee vnder the burden of one sin because the wrath of God which is the heauiest thing in all the world doth hang and lye vpon sinne and sinners for euer Vnder which condition all men without exception that are but meere men do lye Iohn 1 8. Tim. Whereof doth this admonish vs Sil. First of the miserable condition of al mankinde through sinne Secondly it stirreth vp our mindes to thinke vpon and looke after a Sauiour Thirdly it doth teach vs to reproue others with compassion considering our selues be sinners and in the same case and condemnation Gal. 6 1. Tim. How doth he proue the guilt and condemnation of all men Silas By authority of Scripture Psal. 14 3. Tim. What learne wee from this Silas That al Diuine truth must be proued by Scripture because the Conscience is not perswaded of anie sauing truth till it heare God speake who now doeth not speake to vs but in his word onely Secondly hee speaketh to his Church in Scripture onely and his voice alone is sufficient to perswade all truth For the word of God is perfect Psal. 19 7. Tim. From what Scripture doth he fetch his first Authoritie Sil. From Psal. 14 3. There is none rigtheous no not one In these words all men be comprehended as it appeareth by the vniuersall particle None Also by doubling the deniall No not one That is none at all one or other Tim. But were not Adam and the Man Christ righteous Silas They were so but Christ was more then a man and Adam was righteous before his fall This sentence must be vnderstood of meere men such as they be since the fall of Adam as for Dauid Iob Zachary with other righteous men they are indeede called righteous but it was with vnperfect righteousnesse inherent or imputed to their Faith or by comparison as in Genesis 6 9. Tim. What is meant heere then by righteousnesse Silas One that is perfectly conformed to the will of God in all his thoughts wordes and workes without any fault or defect Of this sort of men there is not one to be found in all the stocke of Adam The reason is because al men are conceiued in sinne and after their new birth they haue sinne still dwelling in them Rom. 7 verse 14 15 16 17 18 c. Tim. But it is only mens actions that are not righteous the persons of the elect are alwayes righteous Silas This Text speaketh of persons no man again if persons bee righteous then the actions are not nor cannot be vnrighteous Tim. What followes of this Silas That all haue neede of the righteousnesse of Christ apprehended by faith that they may stande iust before Gods tribunall seate seeing all and euerie one be in their owne persons destitute of righteousnes nay full of vnrighteousnesse DIAL VII Verse 11 12. There is none that vnderstandeth there is none that seeketh God they are all gone out of the way they haue been made altogether vnprofitable there is none that doth good no not one Tim. VVHat is the drift of these Scriptures Silas To condemne all mankinde of sinne and therefore voyde of true righteousnesse wanting Christ who alone is the iustice of sinners Tim. Wherein doth the corruption of sinne appeare Silas First in the vnderstanding by ignorance Secondly in the affection by frowardnesse Thirdly in the actions by doing euill and leauing good vndone Or thus he accuseth the Iewes first of iniustice Secondly of blindnesse Thirdly of falling away Fourthly of deceite Fiftly of cursing Sixtly of cruelty Seuenthly of discord Eightly of prophanenesse Tim. Why doth hee say That all men are without vnderstanding Silas Because all men naturally doe lacke the true knowledge of God to Saluation euen as blinde men who for lack of eies see hot the Sunne though it shine neuer so bright and note that Paul setteth downe by negation what the Psalmist spake affirmatiuely keeping the sence though not the words by his Apostolike authority Tim. What was obserued here Sil. The pollicy of Sathan doing to all men as the Rauens do to the Lambs whose eies they first pick out when they will deuoure them Secondly the misery of man being in his most noble part that is his vnderstanding wounded and spoyled so as he perceiueth not the thinges of God nor can do 1 Cor. 3 14. Tim. Why doth he begin with the vnderstanding Sil. Because on this dependeth the whole life which cannot bee but euill when the minde is naught for ignorance is the mother both of errour Yee erre not knowing the Scriptures and of prophanenesse as it is written Ephe. 4 18. Tim. What learne wee from hence Sil. First to be humbled for our ignorance Secondly to pitty others that remaine still in ignorance being ready to instruct them and to pray for opening their eies Thirdly to thanke God for sound knowledge if wee haue any Fourthly to pray to God for an vnderstanding heart for wee haue it not by naturall instinct Tim. Why doeth he
because he is so man as he is God also Thirdly because he is appointed to bee the person that should reconcile mankind Iohn 6 26. Tim. Why is it added By his blood Sil. This may bee ioyned either with faith to shew whereunto it leaneth namely to Christ crucified or ynto atonement because the propitiatory was sprinkled with blood by the High-priest when he entred into the holy place to teach that without blood is no remission of sin but whereas Paul doth onely mention his bloud thereby he would signifie the whole entire passion of Christ by a 〈◊〉 Bloud a part being put for the whole Sacrifice of Christ which was the consummation of his obedience Tim. What doth this put vs in minde of Silas First of the fiercenesse of Gods wrath and his wonderfull Iustice against sinne in that he could not be satisfied but by the bloud of his onely sonne Secondly of Christs aboundant loue to vs and what loue we owe to him againe Thirdly it giueth much comfort vnto great sinners being afflicted in soule and humbled that such an vnvaluable price was laide downe for their sins Lastly it sheweth that the fauor of God is of very great worth more then all the world seeing it could not bee purchased but by a price greater then the world Tim. But what means haue we to apply the bloud of Christ to vs Silas Onely by faith by the power whereof wee vnderstand and beleeue that blood to be shed for vs vnto our full attonement with God And note that there be two meanes or Instruments of our redemption First without vs on Christ his part which is his death or bloodshed Secondly within vs on our part Faith DIAL XV. Verse 25 26. To declare the righteousnesse of God by the forgiuenesse of the sinnes that are Dassed through the patience of God Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text Silas To expresse the cause or end for which God doth iustifie elect sinners which is the manifestation of his righteousnesse patience to the glory of his name Tim. What is heere meant by righteousnesse Sil. The truth and fidelity of God in sending his son according to his promise to worke the work of our redemption Secondly the Iustice of God in inflicting the whole punishment of sinne vpon the person of his Sonne Thirdly the mercy of God in smiting his Sonne that he might spare vs. We may vnderstand it of that which before was called the righteousnesse of Faith which God hath manifested to be the true iustice wherby men are iust before him Silas What learne we from this Tim. Seeing that God in reconciling the world vnto him by his Sonne did secke his owne glorie that is the marke which we our selues are to ayme at in seeking our saluation not seeking so much to be saued which may come of selfe-loue as that in our saluation God may haue his glory Tim. May not this bee vnderstoode of the righteousnesse which Christ wrought in his Man-hoode Sil. True it may be called the righteousnesse of God because the person was God which wrought it that is the onely righteousnesse which God doth allow and by which wee are acceptable For when this righteousnesse of Christ is giuen vs euen in our Iustification both sins past present and to come are forgiuen vs. Tim. Why doth he say then by forgiuenesse of sinnes passed Silas Some do vnderstand it of sinnes done vnder the old Testament but it is of others otherwise interpreted offinnes already committed because forgiuenesse is properly of sinnes past which men haue formerly done But the former interpretation seemeth to bee the best because of that which followes at this time present So then the meaning is this that as well the sins done before Christes comming in the flesh as those done since his first comming are forgiuen Gods Children which beleeue Tim. What was the vse of this Sil. To teach vs that the merit of Christs death looketh backwards and not onely forwards to them beleeuers that liued in the world before his passion aswell as to them that liued after his death and so he is the Lambe slaine from the beginning of the world For from the fall of Adam no forgiuenesse of sinnes to any but thorough Christ beleeued on Tim. Why is this added Through the patience of God Sil. Because he would shew that God doth bear with those sinners whom he will forgiue Tim. What is the patience of God Silas It is that propertie whereby hee suffereth them long exercising it towards the Reprobate in taking frō them all excuse and towards the godly in giuing them space of repentance Tim. What may we learne from hence Silas First to vse patience towards such as do offend vs that we may be like vnto God Secondly not to 〈◊〉 though God doth verie often for beare offenders because they may be such as God meaneth to forgiue and eternally saue to his owne praise DIAL XVI Verse 26 27. To shew at this time his righteousnes that he might be iust a Iustifier of him which is of the Earth of Iosus Where is then the reioycing It is excluded By what Lawe Of workes Nay but by the Law of Faith Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text Silas To set foorth now fully the finall cause or true end for which God sheweth mercy to sinners for the pardoning of their sinnes which was to declare his righteousnesse Tim. What is meant by this time Silas That time when the Apostles liued and preached the Gospell and so forwardes to the end of the world neither the sinnes of former times nor of times present or future are forgiuen any other way then by faith in Iesus Christ. Tim. What learne ye by this Silas That there is but one way for forgiuenesse of sinnes to all men which liued before and since Christ euen by faith in him Therefore the Religion not of Papists but of Protestants is the ancient true religion Tim. That he might be iust what is that to say Sil. That is to say that hee might bee manifest and known vnto vs to be iust as he is in himselfe God doth shew himselfe to be iust vnto vs-ward two wayes First by punishing our sinnes seuerely in the person of his Sonne Secondly in pardoning them mercifully vnto vs which beleeue for his promise sake For as God is iust in himselfe so this Iustice is communicated to vs thorough faith in Christ. Tim. How is God called a Iustifier Silas Because he it was which gaue his Sonne as also which offered him and who doth impute him with his obedience for righteousnesse vnto the beleeuers which be of the faith of Iesus that is to say whosoeuer hec is that by faith embraceth Iesus Tim. Why is faith required in them who are to bee iustified by Christ Sil. That men may be shut out from any matter of reioycing in themselues For if righteousnesse came by our workes wholly or in part then wee shoulde haue
imputation of righteousnes to the beleeuer without workes Tim. Who was Dauid Sil. The Pen-man of the Holy-ghost one of the holie Prophets Tim. What followes heereof Silas That his testimony is to be receiued as the testimony of God because the Prophets wrote as they were moued by the holy Ghost Tim. What meanes he by describing Silas Not a perfect definition but a short and plaine setting before vs of the matter Tim. What is meant by the Blessednesse of the man Sil. The man which is blessed or which may be esteemed and held blessed Tim. What do ye call blessednesse Sil. The happy condition and estate of such as bee in Gods fauour through Christ. Tim. What is meant by imputing Silas To impute is to put a thing into ones account or reckoning it is a word borrowed from Merchants who are saide to impute that whereof they exact a reckoning and account Tim. What is meant here by righteousnes Sil. The exact and perfect conformity and agreement to the will of the Creator which since Adam was found in Christ onely Tim. Why doth he say without workes seeing Dauid speaketh not of workes in that part of the Psalme Sil. It must of necessity bee vnderstood for if this bee the blessednes to haue the righteousnesse and good works of another that is of Christ accounted to vs then a man is righteous and blessed without his owne works Tim. Tea but he meaneth ceremoniall and naturall workes done before our conuersion workes done before faith Sil. Nay not so but he meaneth all workes wherein sin may be committed and therefore more principally works of the moral law because more properly sinne is in them againe Dauid speaketh this euen of himselfe being nowe conuerted and renewed vnto faith Tim. What were we taught out of the testimony it selfe Sil. Sundry things first that there is but one way for all men to become blessed and this is by free pardon Secondly from hence is matter of great comfort for the pore and needy in that the wealthy of the world haue no other true happinesse then that which is common to the poorest beleeuer Thirdly here is matter of great humbling for the mighty and rich in that the poore are equall to them in the chiefest things Fourthly here is matter of great vnity and loue amongst all sorts in that there is but one common saluation or meanes of forgiuenesse of sinnes to the begger and to the king Tim. What is that way of blessednes which is common to all the Saints tell vs-this more plainly and distinctly Sil. Free forgiuenesse of sinnes through faith in Iesus Christ which is expressed heere by three phrases or fashions of speech First remission of sinnes which is a discharge of a debt Secondly couering of transgression it beeing a speech taken from such as hide vnseemely things from the eies of others least they bee offended so our sins by forgiuenes are hid from the eies of Gods iustice Thirdly of not imputing that is not reckoning it to vs or calling vs to any account for it A speech borrowed from Merchants or Creditors who doe put that debt out of the reckoning which they meane to forgiue so are wee saide to haue sinne not imputed as when a creditor of grace and fauour accepteth a debt to be paid accounting it discharged when the party indebted is not able to pay it Tim. What vnderstandeth hee by forgiuenes of sinne more then is expressed Sil. The imputation of Christ his righteousnes which cannot bee seuered from remission of sinnes so heere is a Synechdoche of the part Tim. What was further here noted Sil. That forgiuenes is of all sinnes great and small many and few one and other Secondly that seeing we cannot be free from sinne but by forgiuenesse we should therfore auoyde sinne the more carefully being wary that wee do not that from which we cānot be quitted but by a pardon and least we abuse that mercy which doeth so graciously couer our faults Tim. What other things more were noted out of this text Sil. Sundry first touching blessednesse Secondly touching Gods mercy in forgiuenes of sin Thirdly touching our duty about leauing of sin Tim. What was noted and obserued concerning blessednes Sil. Many things first the causes of blessednes the chiefe working cause is Gods grace or the fauor of God the meritorious and materiall cause is Christ his obedience to death the ende or finall cause is Gods glory the instrument Gods word offering our faith apprehending the Sacraments sealing hence it is written Blessed are they that beleeue blessed are they that heare the word and keep it Secondly the effects of blessedness the effects towardes our selues are forgiuenes of sinnes regeneration peace of conscience ioy in the holy Ghost graces of the new man as knowledge wisedome faith hope loue and patience The effects towards others bee the workes of loue and mercy and all fruits of our labour in our calling hence it is saide Blessed is the man whose sinnes are couered Psal. 32. Blessed are the mercifull and the 〈◊〉 and the poore in spirit Math. 5. Thirdly the degrees of blessednes which bee three first in this life an entrance into a blessed estate by beeing engrafted into Christ through faith to bee 〈◊〉 of him and his benefits of forgiuenes of sinnes and sanctification Secondly the proceeding in it at death when the soule is receiued into glory the body beeing laide into the earth Thirdly the perfection of it in heauen when the whole man shall be glorified hence it is said Blessed are they which dye in the Lord Reuel 14. 13. Blessed are they who are called to the Lambes martage Reue. 19. Tim. What was obserued touching forgiuenes of sinnes Sil. That the Prophet speaking in the plurall number giueth vs to vnderstand that not one or a few nor smal but many and great sinnes are forgiuen the faithfull the reasons hereof are first because otherwise they coulde not bee blessed if one sinne were vnpardoned for they coulde haue no true peace Secondly Christs merits and Gods mercies exceedeth all and be much greater then al the sins of the 〈◊〉 were they all in any one man Tim. What vse of this Sil. Sound consolation to beleeuers in the time of 〈◊〉 for sinne Secondly an instruction for vs to forgiue our brethren whatsoeuer offence against vs when they come and say it repents mee euen as God for Christs sake forgaue vs Ephe. 4. 32. Obserue that our sinnes only hinder our blessednes which shall bee perfect when our sinnes be wholy taken away meane time it is but begun Tim. What were wee to learne as touching our duty about sinne Sil. That before the committing of sinne wee doe take good heed 〈◊〉 that we may not offend so merciful a God as hath forgiuen vs so great a debt Rom. 12. 1. Secondly because sinne being once committed we cannot bee well eased till wee be forgiuen further we learne that after the committing thereof we despaire not
Christ. This reioycing is a speciall good thing and it is as it were the very life of a mans life Tim. How many kinds of reioycings be there Silas There is a naturall reioycing common vnto all men when the hart is cheared either by an in-bred liuelinesse or by outwarde occasions as in the presence of things pleasant or agreeable to our nature This reioycing is not meant heere Also there is a spirituall and Christian kinde of reioycing which ariseth from the spirit of God stirring vp the heart to reioyce in spirituall and heauenly things when they are present with vs or certainly hoped for As first when the Church flourisheth Psal. 137 3. Secondly when a sinner returneth to the Lord Luke 15 10. Thirdly in the meanes of saluation Ps. 122 1. Fourthly in doing righteousnes iudgement and equity Fiftly in the exercising our selues in the praises of God Psal. 95 1. Sixtly in the reconciliation that we haue with God through Christ when it is beleeued or felt of this our Text speaketh Tim. What is it to reioyce concerning God Silas To haue ioy of heart in this respect that hee is become our Father and loueth vs as his Children and Sonnes Tim. What difference is there in these speeches concerning God as heere and to reioyce in God as 1 Cor. 1 31. and to reioyce with God as Rom. 4 2 Sil. To reioyce in God it is to attribute all thinges which be good vnto God and to render him all thanks for them this we may doe Secondly to reioyce with God it is to to bring something with vs of our owne wherein to glorie and reioyce besides Gods fauour and this we may not doe Thirdly to reioyce concerning God it is to be merry in our hearts for this that we do vnderstand how God doth loue vs as a father his children The like vnto this we haue in Ier. 9 24. Let him that reioyceth reioyce herein that he knoweth me to be mercifull and righteous whereas others reioyce in riches or pleasure or honour or wisedome the Christian ought to reioyce in Christ. Tim. Is there great and iust cause to reioyce for such a gift bestowed on vs as Gods Fatherly fauour through Christ Silas Yea very great for heerein consistes all mans happinesse both now and for euer to haue God reconciled that he may bee a Father to take vs for his sonnes sake and loue Such onely do reioyce therefore such as waigh these things and do inwardly feele them so as they are are affected with them do from hence gather exceeding strong hope of enioying euerlasting life For God is such a Father so constant in his loue as though he will correct them yet neuer will he disinherit them Tim. By whom is it that God is become a fauourable Father vnto vs Silas By Christ his beloued sonne who by his death on the Crosse hath made attonement for our sinnes being there in our stead by the will of his Father and by meanes of our receiuing it thorough faith in the promise of the Gospell we haue made it ours Tim. What thinges doe yee consider seuerally in this attonement spoken of in this place Silas First God to whom wee are reconciled he louing vs and giuing his sonne for vs. Secondly his Son comming to worke our attonement by his obedience passion and Sacrifice Thirdly our Faith embracing this attonement and receiuing it Fourthly a great reioycing of hart in the Faith and certainty of this reconcilement with God Tim. What do ye collect from this whole Doctrine Silas That our Christian and spirituall reioycing it is as our measure of beleeuing is none if our Faith bee none little if our faith be little great if our Faith bee great Therefore as any do long for much true Christian comfort let them endeuor a daily increase of Faith by the humble sincere and constant vse of al those holy meanes priuate and publicke whereby God vseth to enlarge the beleefe of his children DIAL X. Verse 12. Whereas by one man sinne entred into the world aud death by sinne and so death went ouer all men in whom all haue sinned Tim. WHat is the purpose of the Apostle in this Text Silas Hauing spoken hitherto of the first part of Iustification touching remission of sins by faith in the sufferings and death of Christ and laide out the same in the causes effects now he proceedeth to handle the other part of Iustification touching the imputation of Christs perfect obedience vnto vs which beleeue Tim. Is there any necessity of this part of Iustification Sil. Yea very great for we were two wayes endangered to God 1. by not fulfilling and keeping the law as we are bound we lost all right and title to Heauen Secondly by our sinnes done against the Law wee become worthy for euer of eternall punishment in Hell and therefore wee haue neede of a double remedy from Christ one to haue a satisfaction for the deserued punishment and this wee haue by the death and bloudshed of Christ imputed to vs. The other to restore vs to the right of our lost inheritance and this wee haue by the perfect obedience of his life put vpon our faith Tim. How may it appeare that Paul doth thus distinguish the parts of our Iustification Silas Two wayes First by the word reioycing or glorying vsed in the former verse wherein hee makes his passage to this Treatise Tim. What doe ye gather from hence Silas Thus much beleeuing Christians cannot fully reioyce and glory concerning God vntil together with the discharge from the paine due to their sinnes by free forgiuenesse through Christs passion they know and beleeue themselues to be decked and blessed with that absolute obedience and righteousnesse which the Law requireth and vnto which by the promise of the Law eternall life is due which seeing they haue not nor can haue in themselues therefore they haue it of Christ. Tim. What is the second way how ye gather this distinction of two parts of Iustification Silas By the comparison of Adams vnrighteousnesse and his disobedience with Christ his obedience both communicated to all elect persons though in diuers sorts and fashions the which he doth begin in verse 12. and continueth it to verse 20. Tim. Wherein be Adam and Christ compared together Sil. Both in things wherein they are like one to the other and in things wherein they are contrary one to the other They are alike in this generally that each of them conueyeth that which is his vnto such as are theirs and be of them particularly Adam sendeth ouer to all that come of him guilt of sinne and death by his disobedience imputed Christ conueyeth ouer righteousnesse and life to his members by free imputation of faith Also they differ in this that the offence of Adam by which death came vpon all men was but one but the obedience of Christ imputed to beleeuers doth not only couer and doe away that one but all other offences of
the elect also his obedience putteth vpon the faithfull a righteousnesse which meriteth a farre better condition then wee lost by Adams vnrighteousnesse this vnlikenesse is pointed at verse 15 and further laide open verse 16 17. Tim. What be the profits that will arise of this comparison Sil. These First it will serue to confirme our minds touching the certainty of hauing the righteousnesse of another giuen to vs to make vs happy this beeing as reasonable as that the vnrighteousnesse and sinne of another should be deriued to vs to make vs guilty Secondly it will serue much to humble Gods Children to consider well the nature and force of sinne and what hurt they haue taken by it Thirdly the great benefit they haue from Christ will bee better knowne more hungred after and esteemed of vs more greatly by setting before it the contrary euill as a cure is more commended being compared with the danger of the disease Tim. What be the parts of this 12 verse Silas Two First a proposition of the double harme which is come vpō the whole world by Adam through whom all men are vnder sinne and death Secondly a reason heereof in as much as all men were in Adams loynes when he sinned and so sinned in him In whom wee all haue sinned Tim. Now to the words and tell vs what is meant by that one man heere spoken off Sil. Adam as verse 14 vnder whom Eue also is contained for sinne came by them both Psal. 51 5. but the man is named and not the woman because hee being the man was the more worthy person Secondly because hee was more in fault then Eue in regarde of his more eminent power and grace Thirdly sinne is propagated and deriued to vs rather by the Father then by the Mother because he is the principall agent in generation Tim. What were we taught heereby that Adam beeing but one man so great and generall a mischiefe came of him Silas Two thinges First the infinite hurt that may come of one person being euill the meruailous good that may redound to many by one being good Tim. Whereunto should the knowledge heereof serue vs Silas First to admonish Parents verie carefully to looke to the education of euery one of their Children Secondly that it behooueth the publicke state much what manner of person he is that beareth gouernment Thirdly it behooueth them who haue gouernement to watch ouer the manners of all men vnder their charge because one man neglected may marre all as Achan did Iosh. 7. Tim. What was the other thing gathered from hence Silas An exceeding comfort to great offenders so they turne and beleeue the Gospell which may bee raised thus Adam and Eue which sinned so heynously also wrapt their whole kind euen a worlde of people within sinne and destruction were yet receiued to mercy and saued therefore let no sinner how horrible soeuer be out of hart if they come to the throne of grace for pardon with trust to haue it Tim. What is further to bee obserued from this that it is saide Sin entred by one man Silas Euen this that God is not to bee blamed as cause and author of sinne seeing it came in by thorough man For whereas Adam might haue refused the temptation if he would he freely obeyed and willingly yeelded and so sin entred by him without any fault in God who had made him righteous and giuen him freedome of will Tim. Was there not a necessity herein that Adam shold yeeld Silas True there was so in regards of Gods counsel who had decreed not to strengthen his wil in the temptation but to forsake him yea further that being left to himself he shold follow the suggestions that so there might be occasion of giuing and sending his Son to redeem the world to the manifestation of his Iustice and mercy But notwithstanding this yet Adams disobedience was voluntary because Gods decree tho it ruled the euent businesse yet offred no force to Adams wil which could not be compelled therfore of it own accord enclined it selfe to fulfill the motions of the Serpent and his wife and therefore the whole fault of our fall lieth vpon Satan and our first parents as the proper cause of sinne For God made man righteous but they found out sundry inuentions Eccles. 7 31. Tim. What was further learned by this that sinne entred vpon al by meanes of one man Sil. That sinne is not by creation but came in afterwards Secondly how dangerous it is to hearken to ill counsell by meanes whereof Adam being depraued did depraue the whole world Tim. What is meant heere by the world Sil. The men which dwell in the world whither elect or reprobate as it is expounded afterwards Death came ouer all men The word World somtime signifieth that fabricke or frame of heauen earth as Iohn 1 10. The world was made by him Secondly it signifieth elect mē onely which are the chiefe part of the world Ioh. 3 16. And God was in Christ reconciling the world 2. Cor. 5 19. Thirdly it signifieth the wicked reprobate onely Iohn 17 9. Fourthly the corrupt qualities and fashions of the world 1 Iohn 2 15. Loue not the world Fiftly the whole masse of mankinde good and bad as here in these words Sin entred into the world Tim. What is meant heere by sinne Sil. That hereditary disease called commonly originall sinne or birth-sinne spread ouer our whole kind as a Leprosie and hath tainted the whole race of vs. That this onely is heere meant may appeare First because he vseth the singular number but when he speaketh of the fruites of it he vseth the plurall number Secondly that which he calleth sinne heere he afterwards in verse 17. calleth disobedience of one man which must needes be the first or Originall finne Thirdly hee saith verse 17. by this sinne many are made sinners and this is only by originall sin Fourthly there was no other sin brought death ouer all men except that therefore that sinne is onely meant heere In that I call it hereditary it is because as a disease which resteth in any stocke and descendeth from father to sonne so is this sinne it runneth from Adam through his whole progeny from Parents to the Children euen to the worldes end as it is sayde heere It came ouer al men Tim. What may this teach vs Sil. That this sinne is hard to be expelled out of mans Nature as hereditary diseases are hard to be cured and therefore must the more be striuen against Secondly that Children haue no faults which they doe not borrow and deriue from their parents of whome they haue corruption which is the spawne of all sin which should cause in parents commiseration and patience towardes their Children Tim. How many things are contained in this sinne Silas These foure thinges First guilt or fault Secondly deseruing of punishment Thirdly corruption of nature Fourthly priuation or absence of Originall integritie euen
of that innocencie wherein man was created Tim. How proue ye guilt or fault and deseruing of punishment thereby Silas There is guilt or fault because wee are made sinners by it verse 17. and there is deseruing of punishment because this cannot be seuered from the former Also it is expressely saide that by it death went ouer all Tim. How do ye proue that there is corruption of Nature Silas Because it is written That weee go astray from our Mothers wombe Psal. 58 3. Againe that the frame of mans heart is onely euill continually Gen. 8 21. and that we are borne in sinne Psal. 51 5. and man borne of a woman cannot be cleane Iob 25 4. Tim. What doe ye call the corruption of our Nature and what be the fruites of it Silas It is a naughty vicious quality in our Nature whereby it is enclined to all euill naturally and vndisposed vnto any good yea enemie to God and disposed against all good as Titus 3 3. Hating God Col. 1. Minds set vpon euill workes The fruites of this our corrupt Nature are all sinnes whatsoeuer euen all those sinnes reckoned vp Ro. 1. 29 30 c. Gal. 5 19. Tit. 3 3. Col. 3 5. or in any other place euen all maner of sinnes not blasphemy against the Holy-Ghost excepted Tim. By what degrees doth this corruption proceede and go forward Silas First it begetteth lust which is an euill motion or desire sweruing from Gods will this is the spawn of all sinne The second is obedience to this lust Rom. 6 12. which we call consent when the will yeelds vnto the euill motions with purpose and resolution to do it this is called of Iames the conception of sinne Iam. 1 15 Then thirdly there followes an euill action in word or deede this is called of the same Apostle the bringing forth of lust it bringeth forth sinne that is some outward grosse acte in speech or action Lastly the going ouer this sinnefull acte by custome and continuance in it this is called the perfection or finishing of sinne vpon all this there succeedeth death as the terme last period or full point of this proceeding and course in sinning wherein it resteth Tim. But how proue ye that Original sin hath priuation or absence of Originall righteousnesse Silas This is the consequence vpon all the former for we could not be guilty deserue punishment and be corrupt if we had our first perfection Secondly except we had lost that we should not need to seeke and fetch that from another euen from Christ as ver 17. Thirdly when the Scripture saith God made man righteous but they found out many inuentions Eccl. 7 31. This prooueth that the perfect righteousnes giuen vnto vs in our creation is not only lost but thorow our owne fault lost Tim. Why is this sinne called Originall Silas First because it is from the beginning Secondly because it is first in vs before grace Thirdly it is the first head beginning of all sins Lastly it is in vs from our beginning euen from our very conception Tim. What vse of all this Sil. First it confuteth the errors of such which say it is nothing but priuation of righteousnes Also such as say it is nothing but the inclination of our nature to euill Secondly it sheweth the most heauy case in which we are all by birth we being all ouer-couered with corruption and sinfull putrifaction rotten and ful of sores and not so full of euill as voide of all goodnesse and so hatefull to God whose pure eyes cannot but hate vs abhorre vs and therefore we are called the children of wrath Eph. 2 3. See Ezck. 16. No leaper no lazar no Iob to be compared to vs if we saw our selues wee should loath our selues Thirdly the knowledge heereof must humble our stomacks and courages Fourthly it must stir vp great care of being washed and clensed from this spot all the water in the sea is too little to wash this one staine all care in the world is not great enough to get it scoured out Psa. 51 2 6. either repentance for this sinne or for no sinne Fiftly it must stir vp a desire and a thirst after the pure and holy conception of Christ which is the couer to hide the Salue to cure this originall sore Sixtly it may make vs compassionate and mercifull one to another especially to our children being all alike infected and they by vs and therefore in our chiding and corrections were should bee moderate Seauenthly it must keepe vs from extolling nature and the goodnesse of nature for all natures euen the best is poysoned there being nothing good in vs till grace come and plant goodnesse in vs for can one gather figges of thistles or grapes of thornes Math. 7. Tim. What is meant here by death Sil. Properly a depriuation of life vnproperly all such things as are forerunners and furthereis thereof all miseries sicknesses paynes the 〈◊〉 of death Tim. What life did Adam liue before sin Sil. A twofold life first of grace being led by the holy Spirit which moued him wholy to celestiall and diuine things this is called spirituall life The second is of nature wherby he was moued to follow those good things which tend to preserue nature and the estate of his body of both these kinde of liues Adam was depriued and so dyed a spirituall and naturall death for beeing before ioyned to God in his fauour mooued by his spirit hee now hauing sinned was turned from God lost his sauour and spirit and so could not aspire to any diuine thing but had his heart wholy set vpon euill and touching his naturall life he was threatned that to dust he should go Tim. Did not his sin deserue eternall death Sil. It did so but eternal death is nothing saue the continuance of spirituall death Tim. Yet naturall death was not inflicted vpon him after his sin for he liued still in the world and that a great while Sil. He did so howbeit he may be said to be naturally dead so soon as he had sinned First because by the guilt of his sinne hee was presently subiect vnto it Secondly God streight way gaue sentence of death vppon him and therefore hee may bee saide straight way to haue dyed as condemned persons are called dead men though they bee respited Thirdly the messengers and souldiers of death presently tooke hold on him and arrested him as hunger thirst cold heat diseases dayly wasting of his natural moysture to the quenching of life but God did spare him that the sentence was not presently executed to commend his patience and to giue Adam thereby occasion of saluation for the promise beeing giuen and hee called to repentance faitb by that meanes attained a better life through Christ then he lost through sin Tim. What did this shew Sil. That God doth not delight in the death of sinners but rather that they should returne and liue Secondly it teacheth vs patience towards such as
Fourthly the destruction of Sodom 19 24. Fiftly the drowning of the Egyptians Exod. 14 27 28. al which hapned for sinne Tim. What other examples can ye giue to proue this that sin was imputed Silas The death of infants as well as of men of yeares which plainly proueth all men to haue bin sinners and guilty before the Law of Moyses Tim. What learne ye by this that sinne and death doe vnseparably follow one the other Silas That death came in not by creation but by corruption Secondly that if men accompt death terrible they should not thinke sleightly of sin the breeder of it Tim. What meaneth this which is saide heere That death raigned from Adam to Moyses Silas Heereby hee signifieth the force and power of death to bee exceeding great bearing all men downe before it as a mighty King dooth subdue such as rise against him Tim. How long doth the raign of death continue and last Silas Not from Adam till Moyses onely but till the end of the world Tim. Ouer whom doth death exercise his power and kingdome Sil. Ouer all both olde and young none exempted Infants nor men Tim. Yet the Apostle saith of some that they shall not dye but be changed Cor. 15 52. Sil. True yet that change shall bee instead of death to them Secondly this is the condition of all men that through sinne they are subiect to death God may priuiledge whom he will as Enoch and Elias Tim. Whence got death this power Sil. Through mans sinne according to Gods decree Tim. What learne ye heereby Sil. That there is a necessity for al men once to come vnto death Tim. But the faithful haue their sinnes forgiuen them how is it then that they dye Sil. Yet sinne is still in them whence commeth death to them not as a part of the curse for sinne but as an entrance into heauenly blisse whither they cannot come but by death so as they are freed from the hurt which death brings but not from the necessity of dying Tim. What should this teach Sil. That all men are so to make account of death as they doe prepare continually for it and arme themselues continually against the fear of it by keeping faith and a good conscience Tim. You saide that death raigned ouer Infants tell vs by what words are infants described Sil. That they sinned not after that maner that Adam sinned Tim. What meaneth this Sil. That they are free from voluntary and actual sins as in respect of their owne persons Tim. What sin then haue Infants to procure death Sil. Their byrth-sinne or originall corruption which they draw from their Parents by propagation Tim. What is to be gathered hence for our instruction That parents haue cause to mourne for sinne in their young children as well as for their owne Secondly that in the death of their children they consider not so much the losse as the cause which is sinne which would keepe them from impatiencie serue to humble them Thirdly that there is diuers kindes of sinne to wit voluntary inuoluntary originall actuall Moreouer that all sinne is equall thus farre as to deserue death though in other respects vnequall Tim. What will follow of this Silas That God is no respecter of persons young or olde all are one with him Tim. Yet sinnes are not euery way equall Sil. No For there is difference in the degree both of the offence and of the punishment some more heynous then others some to be more grieuously punished then others Tim. What should this worke Silas It should be a bridle to wicked ones to refraine from sinne as much as they can thereby at least to lessen their paine Also a Curbe euen to the godly whose sins howsoeuer pardoned so as they shall not dye eternally for them yet sorer temporall punishments are inflicted as their sinnes be greater As is to be seene in Dauids example who had many smartfull blowes for his very shamefull falles DIALOGVE XII Verse 14 15. Which was the figure of him that was to come But yet the gift is not so as is the offence For if by the offence of one many be dead much more the grace of God and the gift by grace which is by one man Iesus Christ hath abounded vnto many Tim. VVWhat doth this Text containe Silas Two things First the similitude or like nes between Adam and Christ which was the tipe or figure Secondly the dissimilitude or vnlikenes betwixt them but yet the gift is not so Tim. What is meant by him that was to come Silas First Adams posterity as some iudge and then the meaning is all they should be sinners as he was Secondly Iesus Christ who in respect of Adam sinning was to come this is the truth Tim. In what meaning is Adam said to be a tipe or figure of Christ Silas Some take it thus that as Christ is an example to such as willingly obey God so Adam was an example to so many as sinne and disobey willingly this sauours of Pelagianisme as if sinne came by imitation and not by propagation Tim. How then do ye take Adam to be a figure of Christ Silas In respect of that force and efficacy which was in Adam to propagate and conuey euen into all his progeny destruction by sinne Heerein hee was a figure or a Tipe of the second Adam the man Christ Iesus in respect of the like force in him to deriue into his members eternall life by his righteousnesse imputed to their faith Tim. Report vnto vs more plainly and in few words this analogie and proportion which is betweene Adam and Christ Iesus Silas As Adam by his sinne was the cause of death to all men though they did not eate of the forbidden tree so Iesus Christ was made righteousnesse to beleeuers though them-selues had wrought no righteousnesse Heerein was Adam a figure of Christ. Tim. But it may appeare that this is rather a difference and vnlikenesse then a likenesse Sil. True it is so if you take it particularly but not if it be taken generally that is that as Adam meriteth death for his so Christ meriteth life for his that is to take it generally but particularly there is great oddes for grace righteousnesse and life came by Christ Sinne death and damnation by Adam Also Adam by generation of the flesh poureth euill things into men Christ by faith poureth good things into his members Tim. What vse can ye make of this Silas It serueth to confute both Iew and Papist the one for thinking that one Christ cannot bee the redeemer of the whole world whereas it is of them confessed that the whole world was corrupt by one Adam the other for denying that we are iust before God by the obedience of another to wit of Christ yet all men bee made vniust by the disobedience of another to wit of Adam and why not that as well as this De similibus simile iudicium parium par est ratio Tim. What do ye
obserue in the vnlikenesse or dissimilitude in verse 15 Silas These two things First the vnlikenesse set downe plainely that the sinne is not as the gift Secondly that wherein it doth consist for if through the offence of that one c. Tim. What is 〈◊〉 heere by gift But yet the gift is not so Silas The righteousnes or perfect obedience of Christ in keeping the Law nowe this is tearmed a guift to teach vs that it is free and becommeth ours not by desert of workes or dignity of person but because it is giuen vs of mercie euen contrarie to the merite of our deeds Tim. What is meant by offence Silas It is as much as fall and is put heere for sinne Adams sinne was his fall Tim. What learne ye heereby that sinne and fall are knit together Sil. How dangerous a thing sinne is which bringeth with it a fall euen as deepe and perilous as from heauen to hell from the heighth and top of all happinesse to the lowest bottome of misery Tim. What followes of this Silas That seeing such a fall followes sinne sinne is to be fled as one would shun a breakenecke downfall with all godly care and watchfulnesse before it be committed and repentance afterward Tim. Tell vs now wherein consists the vnlikelines betweene Adams sinne and Christs righteousnesse Sil. Heerein the righteousnesse of Christ is of more great strength and efficacie to iustifie then Adams offence was to condemne Tim. Now open the wordes what is this he saith Manie are dead through the offence of one Silas By one he meaneth Adam by many he meaneth all it being set against a few by dead hee meaneth separated or cast out from God vnto euerlasting death Tim. What do ye obserue heere Sil. This thing peculiarly that the infinite and Diuine Iustice is a wonderfull scarfull thing seeing it being but once hurt in one offence of Adam yet inflicted extreame and eternall misery on a whole worlde of men oh let that Iustice be dreadfull to thee Tim. What dooth he heere meane by Grace and guifte by Grace Silas Some thinke Grace doth signifie Gods fauour and Gift the holy Ghost and such good thinges as wee obtaine by him Tim. But how thinke you these words are to be taken Silas By Grace is vnderstoode Christ his righteousnesse whereof the grace and free fauour of God is the roote and fountaine Tim. What signifieth that gift by Grace Silas That most blessed condition wherein they bee which haue Christ his righteousnesse of frec fauour imputed to them Tim. What is that blessed condition Sil. That they are not onely absolued and quit from all guilt of sinne both Adams and their owne and so from all punishment temporall and eternall but also are adorned and cloathed with Christs perfect iustice innocency euen to the obtaining of eternall life Tim. By what similitude do ye explaine this difference betweene Grace and gift by Grace Silas Of a poore miserable man in bondage for debt to his Prince who not onely hath his debt freely discharged by his Soueraigne and King but withall hath a large treasure of many thousand pounds giuen him The treasure bestowed by the Kings Liberality is grace because it comes of free fauour and his happie condition in that of poore he is made rich may be called Gifte by Grace so it fareth in the case of a sinner Christs righteousnesse bestowed vpon him freely is Gods grace and the gift by Grace is that blessed condition wherein he is set through that righteousnesse imputed to his faith being of a sinner made perfectly iust and the child heire of God euen heire annexed with Christ. Rom. 8 17. Tim. What is meant by this that grace hath more abounded Sil. That the righteousnes which commeth by Christ doth in many degrees exceed in excellency and force the guilt and hurt that came by Adam Tim. Declare this vnto vs how grace hath farre exceeded sinne Sil. Because by the grace of Christ we haue forgiuenes of sinne we are regenerated and adopted to be the sonnes of God we are become brethren of Christ his members heires of his kingdome yea heires of this world also for all is ours 1 Cor. 3 22. By what similitude can ye expresse this super aboundance of gracs Sil. Of a Surgeon not onely healing a wound by his medicine but making one stronger and fairer then before Secondly of an Emperor not onely drawing a wretch out of prisou but aduancing him to all manner of riches and dignity so hath the grace of God abounded not onely for pardon of Adams sinne but to many excellent purposes besides to the engrafting vs into Christ to iustificatiō to reconciliation to sanctification to adoption to preseruation in grace to glorification in heauen Tim. What is the instruction to be made of this Sil. That beleeuers haue gotten more by Christ then they lost by Adam by whome wee should haue had an carthly paradice and vnconstant happinesse Secondly that exceeding and vnmeasurable grace of Christ should stirre vp and prouoke vnto exceeding loue obedience thankfulnesse and praise of Christ who is to be blessed againe and againe for euer and euer DIAL XIII Verse 16. Neyther is the guift so as that which entred in by one that sinned for the fault came of one offence vnto condemnation but the gift is of many offences to iustification Tim. VVHat doth this text containe Sil. An explaining of the difference or vnlikenesse put downe in the former verse concerning Adam and Christ. Tim. What was that difference Sil. That the grace of Christ was of more excellency and force to restore vs then was Adams sin to hurt vs. Tim. How is this explained to vs here Sil. Adams sinne that condemned him and vs all was but one Christs righteousnes couereth that sinne and infinite others which we haue added to it Tim. What seuer all things do ye obserue in this verse Sil. A threefold opposition or three things set against three as contraries First the gift and fault Secondly iustification and condemnation Thirdly one offence and many Tim. What is meant here by gift Sil. The righteousnes of Christ freely giuen and that most happy condition which the faithfull are in by hauing it allowed to be their iustice being now not onely absolued from all sinnes but made iust there by and heires of eternall life Tim. What is meant here by that which entred in by one that sinned Sil. This is meant by it first Adams fault in his disobedience to God Secondly that woefull condition wherein all men are wrapt by it being not onely depriued of perfect iustice which they had by creation but couered now with the filth and condemnation of sin thus it is expounded in the next words Tim. What is signified by condemnation Sil. The pronouncing of all men for sinners and worthy adiudging them to eternall torment as in ciuill condemnation the malefactour is first pronounced guilty and thereupon adiudged to his punishment Tim. How came
to wit by the receiuing it with the hand of faith Secondly that this we get by Christ that we shall raigne in life not onely here by grace but be heirs of a glorious kingdome in heauen and so our happinesse by Christ exceeds that which we lost in Adam Tim. What do ye note here where it is said sin and death raygned by Adam Sil. That not onely they entred vpon all men but mightily raigned ouer them so to haue a predominant power Tim. What is it for sin and death to raigne Sil. To rule in men and as a King to subdue them to the lusts of sinne so as they can doe nothing but what sin will neither can they goe a foote from death but all they doe euen their go odlicst workes tend to death and condemnation for all deeds how glorious soeuer in shew yet are but gorgeous sins in men vnregenerated Tim. Is this the condition of all men before Christ be rereceyued by fayth Sil. It is so euen the elect of God are vassals to sin and to their corrupt lusts which worke in them to destruction so as their fairest workes are deadly and damnable Ephe. 2. 2 3 12. Titus 3 3. Rom. 5 6. Tim. What followes hereof Sil. That the elect before they beleeue are so farre off from beeing iustified as they bee in most miserable case slaues to sinne and death in bondage to Sathan which should worke in such as are vnder the kingdome of sinne and death to let them see what great cause they haue to looke after a Christ and Sauiour Tim. But how shall men know they stick in the power of sin and death Sil. By these two marks first if neuer they felt the bondage of sinne nor suspected the flauery of it Secondly if they do not taste the sweetnes of their liberty and reioyce in it aboue all things Tim. What should it woorke in such as are brought out of this raygne Syl. A continuall thankfulnesse to Christ expressed by a care neuer to look back to the seruice of sin from which they are so graciously freed Tim. What is meant by that righteousnes Sylas By an excellency he noteth the righteousnesse of Christ Iesus Tim. How manyfold is his righteousnes Sylas Twofold first essential as he is God Iehouah our righteousnes Ier 23 6. that is his deity or diuine essence which is righteousnes it selfe and giuer of righteousnes to other creatures Secondly accidentall which belongs to his manhoode and is inherent in the man Christ or in his humanity as a quality this accidental righteousnes which is a quality is twofold first an habit of most perfect vprightnes and holines infused into his humane nature euen from the moment of his conception by the holy Ghost This is opposed or set against the corruption of our nature of the imputation whereof at the eight Chapter is spoken at large The second is the most absolute Iustice and obedience which hee performed in the actions of his life and sufferings of his death this is the effect or fruite of the former habit it is distinguished of Diuines into actiue righteousnesse consisting in the fulfilling the workes commanded in the morall Law or passiue righteousnesse in suffering obediently the punishment of death for our breach of the Law The imputation of this wee haue heard of in Chapters 4 and 5. vnto the 11. verse and now in this place he entreateth of his actiue righteousnesse as it commeth instead of that guilt of Adams disobedience imputed to his posterity Tim. Why is his righteousnesse called Grace Sil. To note how we come by it that is by free fauour and what our condition is by meanes of it Tim. Why doth he adde aboundance of grace Silas To note that this Grace did ouercome Adams offence for that was but one acte Christs righteousnes consisteth of many actions Secondly that was but one fault his righteousnesse both quits vs from that and all other sinnes and gets vs to be pronounced iust worthy of eternall life And besides all this with that grace of righteousnesse there goeth the reforming of our nature breaking the force of sinne and framing vs againe to Gods Image which cannot be lost as afore hath been saide Tim. But how do we obtaine to this guift of righteousnesse Sil. By our faith receiuing it For it is the proper Office of Faith to receiue Christ and belongs to no other grace whatsoeuer as Iohn 1 12. Rom. 5 11. Galath 3 14. Tim. Is this receiuing necessary Silas So necessary as without it Christ and his perfect righteousnes cannot profit vs no more then cloaths not put on or meate not taken into the stomacke or a great guift neuer receiued Tim. Is there in this behalfe any difference betweene Christ and Adam Silas There is so and very great for beeing all in Adams loynes when he sinned we sinned with him and so euery one at the instant of our conception are corrupted by sinne whereas though Christ were promised from the beginning and had suffered death long since yet it doth not benefit vs till we do beleeue and receiue him Tim. What should this admonish vs of Silas That great neede there is that euery one labour for this true faith Secondly the blessed estate they bee in which haue it for they haue receiued Christ and his righteousnesse vnto life eternal by which assurance they be armed against doubtings Tim. When it is heere saide That such as receyued Christ shall raigne in life What is meant by life Silas That spirituall life of grace whereby the beleeuing soule now liues to God which heereafter it shal liue with him in glory Tim. What is meant by raigne in life Sil. When the righteousnesse and grace of Christ so beareth sway and ruleth in the soule as though one haue still many sins yet he standeth against their motions and feares not the guilt and danger of them and so is brought at last to saluation Tim. What learne ye now from this place Silas That these fiue things are knit together Christ Righteousnesse Grace Faith and Life haue one haue all lacke one lacke all Secondly that the Grace and righteousnesse of Christ hath set beleeuers in better condition for happinesse then they lost by Adams fault First because that was chaungeable this is permanent this word shall raigne noting perpetuity and euerlastingnesse Secondly that was to bee enjoyed in earth euen in Paradise this in the kingdome of heauen noted in the worde Raigne where God hath his seate and throne and raignes in glory there shall beleeuers raign likewise For they shall sit on thrones euen as Christ shal sit vpon a throne DIAL XV. Verses 18 19. Likewise then as by the offence of one the fault came on all men to condemnation so by the Iustifying of one the benefit abounded towardes all men to Iustification of life For as by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of that one many shall bee made
Righteous Tim. WHat doth this Scripture containe Silas First a rehearsall of the comparison betweene Adam and Christ begun in the twelfth verse Secondly a laying forth the ground of this whole comparison Tim. Declare the comparison as it is rehearsed in the 18. Verse Silas As by the offence of one Adam guiltinesse came ouer all men to make them subiect to death so on the contrary part the righteousnesse of Christ imputed to beleeuers through Gods free fauour iustifieth them that they may become partakers of eternal life Or thus as by Adam guiltinesse came on all men to death eternall so by Christ righteousnesse is giuen to all beleeuers vnto life eternall Tim. What is the ground of all this comparison Silas That Adam and Christ by the decree of God are not as two particular persons but as two rootes or stocks or heads of all mankinde that as out of the one springeth sin and death by Nature so out of the other springeth righteousnesse and life by Grace Tim. Whereunto tends all this Silas To make vs to vnderstand that we are iustified not by our owne workes but by Faith in Iesus Christ. For hauing in our selues by meanes of Adams offence guiltinesse death how can our workes iustifie vs and if they do not then Christs his obedience apprehended by faith must be our Iustice before God Tim. Now let vs expound the words and gather instructions What doth he meane heere by the offence of one Silas The sinne of Adam which was but one sinne as himselfe was but one person Tim. What learne yee by this That guiltinesse came on all men to condemnation Sil. That there is not one that came of Adam by naturall generation which escaped the condition of sinne and death Christ onely is exempted who was conceyued by the Holy ghost and not by the seede of man Tim. What do ye obserue heerein Sil. This namely how dreadfull a thing the offence of Gods Iustice is when but one sinne done in a moment could wrap a world of men in euerlasting death and paine Tim. What learne ye heereby That the Iustifying or righteousnes of Christ is set against the offence of one Silas That as the offence is without vs which makes vs all guilty so is the righteousnesse which iustifies vs not in vs but in Christ. Secondly that iustifying is an absoluing or acquitting vs from guilt and condemnation Tim. What meanes he by all men Silas All the Children of God which beleeue whereof there is an vniuersality as there is an vniuersality of the Reprobate Tim. Why doth he ioyne life vnto Iustification Iustification of life Sil. Not onely by the custome of speech peculiar to the Hebrewes but to teach that life is knit to righteousnesse and heereof it is also that faith and life are so often ioyned together because it is by Faith that wee take hold on righteousnesse which bringeth with it life as a proper and necessary effect Tim. What learne yee generally out of the whole 19. verse Sylas That Adam and Christ are not to be considered of as other particular persons bee but as two heades or rootes of all mankind which depend on them Tim. What seuerall and speciall things do ye now learne out of the 19. verse Sylas That Adams offence was disobedience to Gods word Secondly this disobedience ought to be familiarly known and what hurt we get by it therefore by an excellency called that disobedience as exceeding al others both for the quality and effects Thirdly this disobedience is communicated to all men to the making of them sinners which is done by an action called imputation and so it is euery mans owne sin no lesse then Adams Fourthly that distrust or doubting is the roote of all sinne and so to bee greatly taken heed of Adams fall began at doubting that carried him to disobedience Fiftly that wherein we disobey Gods will therein we bewray old Adam whose children wee shewe our selues to bee by our disobedience against Gods blessed commandement Tim. What do ye call disobedyence Sylas It is a vice which causeth vs not to beleeue God promising or threatning nor to obey him forbidding nor commanding either because the commandements be troblesome or because we cannot see the reason of them Tim. Now tell vs what was that whereby righteousnes and life entred into the world Sil. The obedience of Christ Iesus Tim. What is obedience Sil. It is a power by which a godly man is ready to do and to obey the will of God though the reason of it bee not vnderstood nor it appeare to be any way profitable Tim. Wherein did Christ shew his obedience to God Sil. Throughout his whole life doing alwayes in all things what his Father appoynted without any regard of men but especially in his death wherin he submitted himselfe wholy to the will and pleasure of his Father Tim. Is the actiue obedience of Christ in fulfilling the morall law by doing it necessary vnto the iustification of a sinner before God or his passiue obedience in sufferiug death doth it alone iustifie vs for the Scripture ascribeth our purging remission of sins and saluation to his bloud and death in many places it may seem that Christ kept the Law not for vs but for himselfe to make him a meete high Priest Sil. Iustification hath two parts First the forgiuenesse of sinnes secondly the making of vs iust For as we owed vnto God a satisfaction by death for the breach of the Law so we were bound to performe subiection to God with all power of body and soule and all the might of those powers euen from the time of our being Therefore as we needed the passion of our Lord to discharge the first debt of paine and punishment so the other debt of homage and conformity to the will of God was answered in the obedience of his life that so we might not onely escape death but finde an entrance into life eternall which without perfect obedience to the commandement might not bee granted according to the tennor of the Law Doe this and liue Leuit. 18 5. By which words it is plaine that by meere passiue obedience wee could not haue possession of life which is promised to doing all that is required in the Law for euen Christ himselfe by his doing the Law may claime and challenge eternall life and it cannot be denied him in rigor of iustice because hee fulfilled the condition of workes enioyned by the Law and how should we think to haue life without the Law done which not beeing possible by our selues therefore Christs obedience in his life must be imputed to make vs capable of life For seeing euery iote and tittle of the Law must bee done Mat. 5 18. therefore the sum and substance much more Now the summe of the lawe is to loue God with all our harts c. and this cannot be done by vs which are sinners then there must be a translation of the lawe from
The power of God which was then chiefely declared to his glory when Christ was raised from the dead and in vs it is shewed manifestly when casting away sinne we liue vncorruptly and holily Tim. What is signified by newnesse of life Silas The blamelesse life of Christians or purenesse of liuing Tim. By the word Walking what doth he teach Sil. That of a pure and blamelesse life there be certain degrees as in walking there is a going forwards to a certaine place so there must be a profiting in Christianity more and more Tim. Thus farre of the parts now tell vs the true and proper cause of our Sanctification Silas Our communion with Christ Iesus dead buried and raised againe or our fellowship with the death buriall and resurrection of Christ which is meant by those phrases of being baptised into the death of Christ and of being buried with him heereby signifying vnto vs thus much both that Christ when hee dyed and was buried was in our stead as our surety and also still communicateth the merite and vertue of his death and resurrection to such as are one with him for the destruction of sinne as well as for remission Tim. Shew vs this more plainly what your meaning is Sil. They which are the members of Christ by faith there is a power and vertue deriued and conueyed into them from his death and buriall for the beating downe and consuming the strength of sinne and from his resurrection to the quickning and raising vp their minds and wils to the study and loue of godlinesse Tim. Tel vs now distinctly and particulerly how doeth the death of Christ auayle to the mortifying and killing of sin Sil. Thus Christ Iesus consists of two Natures hee is God and Man as man hee dyed Now the power of his Godhead did in his death vphold his manhood from sinking and gaue merit to his death and the same Diuine power workes in his members for mortifying sin thorough his death Tim. How doth his buriall profit to the buriall of sinne or to progresse of mortification in vs Silas Christes bodie buried was by his diuine power kept from corruption in the graue and that verie power of Christ buried workes the continuall wasting of sinne that it may dye by little and little in his people Tim. Shew vs now how our raising to a newe life is effected by Christ his resurrection Sylas That diuine power that raised the dead bodye of Christ out of the graue worketh in the elect the resurrection of their soules from the death of sinne to the life of righteousnesse Tim. What doth follow of all this Silas First that Christ is a Sauiour not by merit onely but also by vertue and efficacie Secondly euery christian that desireth to partake in the merit of Christs death for Iustification must labour to haue fellowshippe with him in his death for mortification and to feele the Vertue of his resurrection vnto newnesse of life Thirdly such as haue fellowship with his death for the leauing of sinne with a hatred of it and with his resurrection for the leading of a godly and a iust life out of a loue vnto God and to his Law do thereby declare that they are one with Christ himselfe grafted in them Tim. How is our Sanctification made knowne to a Mans selfe and vnto others Silas By two pledges and testimonies the one inward the other outward the inward is the change of our affections when the heart loatheth the sinnes it was wont to loue and striueth against them and loueth such Vertues and duties as once it did abhorre endeauouring to do them with a desire to please and glorifie God The outward pledge is baptisme which is no empty bare but a powerfull pledge and instrument thereof Therefore it is said We are baptized into his death that is to say it is an effectuall pledge of our fellowship with Christ in his death aswell to Sanctification as to Iustification Tim. Declare how Baptisme is a pledge of our sanctification in all parts of it Silas The holy Ghost by the water of Baptisme being sprinkled vpon the childe as by an instrument not onely sealeth but worketh Sanctification by linking knitting the elect nearer vnto Christ from whome they draw vertue and power not onely for the mortifying the burying of their sinnes but for the pleasing of God in a new course of life Or thus the death of sinne is effectually represented by the water cast on vs at our baptisme and buriall of sinne by our being vnder the Water and by our comming out of the water is signifyed our arising out of our sinnes to a better life thorough the power of the holy Ghost applying Christ his death and buriall for the beating downe of our corrupt Nature and his resurrection or our quickning to godlinesse of liuing Tim. Then the power of Baptisme dependeth not vpon the Element of water or on the Minister or actions performed in the ministration Silas No surely but vpon the ordinance of Christ appointing it to be a pledge of remission of sinnes and repentance and vppon the Spirite and diuine power of Christ working by his ordinance a straighter Coniunction betweene himselfe and the elect beleeuers Tim. Whereof should this put vs in minde Silas That such parties as are baptized are much beholden to God for such a testimony and instrument of his grace and in this regarde stand bound to depart from sinne and to liue godlily especially hauing made a solemne Vowe and couenant in their Baptisme that they will not serue sinne in the lust thereof but God in keeping his word and doing his will therein reuealed to the vtmost of that Grace which they haue receiued DIAL III. Verse 5. For if we be planted with him to the similitude of his death so shall we bee to the similitude of his resurrection Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text Silas To make it manifest that the power grace of dying to sinne and walking in a new life is deriued and borrowed from Christ Iesus Tim. How is this declared and made plaine Silas By a similitude or comparison of planting For as it fareth with a grift translated from an old stocke into a new so is it with elect beleeuers As the grift liueth groweth and fructifieth by the iuyce drawne from the new stocke into which it is planted so the elect beeing taken out of the olde rotten stocke of Adam and planted into that Noble stocke Christ Iesus they participate of his heauenly Spirite by whose vertue applying the death and resurrection of Christ to them they receyue power to die to sinne and to liue to God Tim. What is meant by the similitude of his death and resurrection Silas Thus much that what was done in Christ by nature must be likewise done in vs by Analogie or proportion as thus Christ dyed naturally so wee must feele in our selues a dying of our sinnefull desires as hee rose againe out of the graue so
we must rise out of sin to liue a godly life And the power whereby wee can do this is deriued from the death and resurrection of our Lord as the grifte liueth by the life of the stocke to which it is ioyned Tim. What doth this similitude of planting teach vs Sil. Sundry things First that naturally we are strangers from Christ beeing in the stocke of rotten Adam whence we must be taken that we may be one with him Secondly that whiles we remain in Adam out of Christ we can no more do any good then a grift can bring forth fruite being alone and seuered from the stocke Thirdly to the end we may liue spiritually to God wee must first be vnited to Christ as the plant or grift is vnited to the Tree into which it is planted Fourthly whatsoeuer power is in vs to do good or to leaue sinne it is al from Christ not from our selues As the graft set in a stock taketh now no life from it selfe but from the stocke into which it is grafted By this is quite ouerthrown the concurrence of nature and grace Tim. What are we to learne from hence that the Resurrection of Christ is heere annexed and ioyned vnto his death and mentioned after it Sil. These two things First wee learne that as Christ had no way opened vnto his resurrection but by death so till we depart from sinne we cannot be raised vp and renewed to a righteous life Secondly as Christes death and resurrection be ioyned together so our death to sin is euer accompanied with a newe and vnblameable life which can no more bee seuered from mortification then the resurrection of Christ can be seuered from his death and therfore our Apostle hath truly affirmed before that such as bee dead to sin cannot liue in it verse 2. for nowe they lead their liues according to God Tim. I haue heard you speake of the likenesse between a grift and the elect and what we are to learne by it shew me nowe in this likenesse what dissimilitude and vnlikenesse there is Silas It is a sure truth that no similitude doth holde in all things it is sufficient to holde in that for which it is applied as in this present similitude which is brought to shew that as a slip passeth from one tree to another and hath life from that stock into which it islast planted so the elect passing from Adam to Christ are partakers of his spirit but as in euery other similitude there is a dissimilitude so in this likenes there is an vnlikenes and it doth consist in two things first the slippe or grift is taken from a good tree and fastned to a wilde Secondly it retaineth still his olde nature though it be planted into a new stocke now it is not so in this spirituall planting of men into Christ. For wee are plucked from an vnfruitfull tree and wild Oliue euen from the corrupt nature of Adam and are grafted into Christ as a most noble stocke a tree of righteousnesse whose very leaues are wholesome also we put off our old nature which we had afore and leaue the affections which spring of our birth-corruption are partakers of the spirit of Christ whose nature and properties we put on Rom. 12 14. Tim. When may we be said to leaue off our olde nature and affections of sinne and by what meanes are wee best furthered to it Silas When wee begin perfectly to know our selues that whatsoeuer commeth of our nature is in vs without Christ is naught and vicious and are moued to bee displeased with it and to abhorre it with an earnest and constant endeuour to leaue and forsake whatsoeuer is from our corrupt nature whereunto wee are much furthered and holpen by the faithful and fruitefull meditation of Christs painefull death when wee doe consider the shame and bitternesse thereof to bee occasioned by our owne sinnes it will cause a mans heart to rise against them as a mans heart ariseth against his enemy prouoking vs speedily to shake and cast thē off which cast our beloued and blessed Sauiour into such a bloudy agony and hell of sorrowes for who can beleeue that Christ was made a curse for his sinnes and yet still liue in the loue and seruice of sinne Tim. When may it be said of vs that we haue put on the nature and properties of Christ into whom we are newly planted Silas When we doe feele wrought in vs by his spirit such feelings and affections as he had putting on like mercy loue faith meekenesse patience long-suffering ioy goodnesse temperance and kindnesse as the man Christ had being meeke and lowly as he was c. DIAL IIII. Verse 6 7. Knowing that this our olde man is crucified with him that the body of sinne might be destroyed that henceforth we should not serue sinne for he that is dead is freed from sinne Tim. WHat is the substance of this Text Silas It rehearseth the principal argument to proue that beleeuers are dead to sinne taken from their Communion with Christ and his death with him Secondly it mentioneth the kind of death by which he merited for them the spirit of Sanctification by the death of the Crosse Crucified Thirdly it layeth foorth the ende of our Sanctification which is the destruction of sinne that the body of sinne might be destroyed Fourthly the duty of sanctified persons that hencefoorth they serue not sinne Lastly a reason thereof because they that are dead are freed from sinne verse 7. Tim. What is meant heere by the olde man Silas The vniuersall corruption of our nature as wee are conceiued and borne in sinne whereby we are prone vnto all euill and vndisposed vnto any good the which corruption is therefore called olde because it hath been in mans nature euer from our first parents Adam Secondly because it is in euery Child of God before that new quallity of holinesse for which they change their olde deformity at their new birth And for other two respects the name of Man is attributed vnto our sinnefull corruption First to shew how neerely the euill and poyson of sinne cleaueth to vs being as it were a mans selfe Secondly to note how men are addicted vnto it before they be sanctified they do not thinke themselues to be men without it so striuing for the maintenance of their dearling sinnes as they would doe for the safety of soule or body one were as good plucke out a mans hart as seeke to pull him from his beloued sinnes as good kill the man himselfe as his sinne Tim. In what sence is our olde man saide to be crucified Silas To haue our olde man crucified is to haue the strength of our sinne enfeebled weakened and broken by little and little as Christs body was weakened vpon the Crosse till he dyed Tim. What may this word Crucifie put vs in minde of Silas Of the kinde of death which Christ suffered namely the cursed death of the Crosse by which death he
not vnder the Law but vnder grace God forbid Know ye not that to whomsoeuer ye giue your selues as seruants to obey his seruants ye are whom ye obey whether it be of sinne vnto death or of obedience vnto righteousnesse Tim. VVHat doth this Text contayne Silas An answere of the Apostle Paul vnto a cauilling obiection made against his former doctrine Tim. First of all tell vs what he meaneth by Sinne when he saith What then shall we sinne v. 15. Sil. By Sinne is meant heere not one act of sin but a continuall course of sinning and it is as much as if it had beene said Shall wee liue or leade our liues in sinne as before verse 2. or shall we serue sinne verse 6. or shall we obey sinne This then is the meaning of the obiection Shall wee giue ouer our selues licenciously to sinne because wee are not vnder the Law but vnder Grace Which obiection did arise from the ill vnderstanding of the Apostles words For his words were so taken of some as if hee had meant by not beeing vnder the Law our freedome from the gouernment and doctrine of the law and so the bridle being cast loose in our necks we might haue liued as we list which was very farre from the Apostles meaning Tim. What may we learne from this Obiection Silas Our first instruction from this Obiection is to learne how ready and prone sinnefull men bee to snatch vp all manner of occasions which may nourish liberty in sinne peruerting holy doctrine to this end therefore al men must watch ouer their owne hearts being naturally bent to these crooked shifts auoyding the company of sinnefull men which affect such naturall licenciousnesse Secondly that the il vnderstanding of things wel taught breeds errors and cauillings and therefore we must take heed of mistaking good doctrine Thirdly that there is no doctrine so sound but one or other will carpe at it wrest it therefore Teachers must arme themselues with patience Fourthly that Ministers of the word must haue skill not onely to teach the truth but how to meet with and conuince such gaine-sayers Tim. Now tell vs what answere the Apostle makes vnto the former cauillations and how the Obiection is wiped away Sylas It is first to be noted that the Apostle doeth not directly answere their cauilling argument which is Sophisticall being a fallacy from the ambiguity of the speech of not beeing vnder the law which the obiectours tooke as beeing meant of a freedome from the obedience of the law wheras the Apostle vnderstood it of the rigorous exaction of the law forbidding euill thinges and giuing no strength to forbeare them but rather prouoking our lusts more after such euils as it forbids Our Apostle therefore contents himselfe to answere the consequent of the argument namely that which was vntruly concluded and gathered from his owne doctrine to witte that we might freely sin this consequent he answereth two wayes His first answere is by words of detestation God forbid in 15 verse hereby teaching vs that all wicked and false things inferred from the worde must bee abhorred of vs. In the second part of his answere he proues the quite contrary to the obiection namely that such as bee not vnder lawe but vnder grace ought not to serue sin but Christ their Lord. Tim. How doth he proue this by what argument Sylas By these two reasons the first is taken from the condition of Seruants in the beginning of the 16. verse This reason standeth thus It is meete that euery one obey him whose seruant he is but all true beleeuers are the seruants of God and not of sin therefore are they bound not to obey sin but God in doing his will Which the Apostle doeth confirme and backe by the testimony of euery mans conscience know ye not that a seruant must obey him that is his Lord and that Christ is your Lord and not sin ye all know this by the light of nature the one and the other ye know by the light of the word Tim. What thinges are wee to learne out of this first reason Sylas First that it is wisedome in the Ministers of the word to build their doctrine vppon knowne and receiued principles of which euery one is conuicted that they are true Secondly wee must iudge of our seruice either to sinne or to God not by our profession but by our practise and obedience if we do fulfill and obey the lusts of sinne then are we the seruants of sin whatsoeuer wee professe or say to the contrary Thirdly that it standes with great reason that a Christians life should be a continuall obedience to Christ because he is our Lord and hath admitted vs to be his seruants who by nature through Adams fall were wholly captiues to Sathan and sin but Christ by his death hath freed vs from this captiuity and addicted vs to himselfe to this end that we should not now serue sin our former Lord but Christ our new maister who hath deliuered vs from sin and Sathan as seruants which paste from one maister to another doe euer please and serue the latter maister Tim. What is the second reason whereby he proues that wee ought to obey Christ and not sin Sylas The second reason of this text is taken from the effects which follow the seruice of Christ and of sin which be death and life whether it bee of sin to death or of obedience vnto righteousnesse This second reason hath two branches and may be thus framed such as obey and serue sin must haue death for their reward therefore wee ought not to serue sin least we dye for it Againe such as obey Christ by doing righteous things shall haue eternall life for their reward therefore wee ought to obey Christ and renounce the seruice of sinfull lusts that wee may liue for euer Tim. What instructions do ye gather from hence Sylas First of all that sin and righteousnes be two contrary Lords as fire and water as God and Mammon loue the one and hate the other Secondly that all men must doe seruice to one of these two Lordes no man can serue both at once because they commaund contrary thinges Thirdly wee learne here the nature of sin that it is repugnant to the obedience of the lawe or vnto righteousnes therefore a filthy vnrighteous and bitter thing Fourthly that the seruice of sin is to bee auoyded as a damnable or deadly thing bringing to destruction in hell and deseruing it Lastly that a righteous life that yeelds obedience vnto God shall end in eternall life though it cannot merite it Tim. But our Apostle hauing said whether of sin to death why did he not likewise say or of righteousnesse to life but saith thus of obedience to righteousnesse What are we to learne by this kinde of phrase and stile Sil. These three things First that this is the righteousnesse of workes to liue obediently vnto the will of God reuealed in his word
engender both shame and death therefore the seruice of it is of all Christians to be carefully auoyded Silas What bee the generall instructions from this 21. verse Tim. First where sin goes before vnrepented of there of necessity by the ordinance and iustice of God shame and death will follow after these be the fruites which sinners must reape euen as they sow Secondly we are to learn from hence that howsoeuer men are not ashamed whiles they are in the act of sin yet afterward though they haue repented as these Romaines had the memory of their sin doth breed shame and trouble of minde Lastly the children of God because they haue much flesh and corruption remayning in them had need to be awed and held to their duties by fearefull threatnings where of there is vse euen for the most godliest to helpe to subdue their sturdy nature Tim. Nowe expound the wordes of the 21. verse and tell vs what is meant by fruite Silas Commodity gaine or profit this speech of the Apostle hath a mocke in it for hee well knewe that there came no fruit of such things but by this meanes he thought to presse and vrge their conscience more forcibly when they should perceiue that they had spēt their time in things whereof there came no credit or profit but both shame losse euen eternally this must cause euery one examiue himselfe in euery act whether he serue sin or righteousnes Tim. What are the things whereof the Romaines had cause to be ashamed Silas Two things generally first vnpurenesse of life and conuersation see Chapter 1. 24. 25. c. Secondly vnpurenesse of their religion they beeing both worshippers of Idols and prophane in their manners Rom. 1. 20. 21. 22. c. These things were accompanied with shame that is to say with griese and perturbation in minde and conscience in the fight of God vppon remembrance of these their offences against him for the shadow doth not more necessarily attend the body thē shame doth sin which maketh conscience blush within aswel as red checks without Tim. How many wayes is shame taken in scripture Sylas Two wayes first properly that affection so called which appeares in the countenance by blushing this is natural shame which commeth either for griese of some dishonesty already done or for feare of some dishonesty that may be done This kinde of shame is common both to good and bad and bringeth forth in them both certain common effects as to cause them to change their minds to bee loth to come in presence to doubt least they doe not please others to discourage them in their duties and somewhat to disquiet them finally touching this affection of naturall shame this counsell is to bee giuen that it bee so cherished in all in young folkes especially to be made a bridle to keepe from filthy things as care be taken least it grow vehement and excessiue Secondly shame is vnproperly taken for trouble or griese of conscience being cast down abased before God the former may be called shame of face and this latter shame of conscience when no shame-faced man is so dashed out of countenance before men for offending against common honesty and ciuility as the soule and conscience is ashamed for some sin wittingly committed against Gods law this shame considered in it selfe and as it is in the wicked is a part of the torment of hell but as it is in the godly it is blessed as a meanes to keep them from running into hell being a fruit and consequence of their repentāce as in these Romanes who nowafter their conuersion had shame for things done afore Tim. What things doth this shame of conscience work in the children of God and in the wicked of the world Sil. First it causeth the godly to come into the presence of God with reuerence and fear but it maketh the wicked to shun his presence as Adam who after he had sinned hid himselfe in the thicket of trees and Cain who hid himselfe after hee had murdered his brother Secondly it maketh the godly to blame and accuse the sins which they haue done with detestation and forsaking them as it is written of Ephraim Hee was ashamed but it hardeneth the wicked in their euils Thirdly it prouoketh the godlic more vnto dutie but from the wicked it taketh al heart of doing any good dutie Fourthly it helpes the godly vnto true peace at the last whereas it is but a torment vnto the wicked and beginning of their hell Lastly the godly are ashamed of God that he should knowe their sinnes but the wicked are more trobled that the world doth take knowledge of their sinnes This is it that vexeth them Tim. What aduice is to be giuen concerning this shame of Conscience Sil. A double aduice vnto Gods Children First that it should serue to stay them from committing sin seeing shame and griefe will follow it Secondly when they feele this godly shame and griefe after any sin vnheedefully done let them thanke God for such a mercie Also vnto the wicked this aduice is to be giuen that it moue them to hasten their repentance as they desire to auoide confusion of Conscience for euer in hell whereof their shame of sinne heere is both a part and an enterance if it be not looked vnto Tim. Seeing all euill is the fruite of sinne wherefore doeth the Apostle mention shame onely Silas The reason is because shame doth alwayes follow sinne so doth not other euils Secondly shame followes vs in euery place but wee doe not in euery place meete with affictions and other euils Lastly if as often as we sinne God should strike vs with some euill wee should neuer abide it therefore it is best for our profit to haue such a gentle monitour as shame is to pluck our conscience by the eare and to iogge vs on the Elbowe that wee may be stayed from doing euill when wee are tempted or from going on if we haue yeelded Tim. What is the next Reasons to hold vs from sin Tim. It is taken from the end of sinne which is death by which is meant the second death which is called eternall death in which we may consider two things first a separation of the whole man from heauenly glorie Secondly a destruction of the whole man in hellish paine Tim. What is meant heere by End Silas This word signifies eyther the cause for which a thing is done or it is put for the last terme of any thing so it is vsed heere For men do not sinne for this cause that they may dye eternally yet eternally death is the tearme of the seruice of sinne which doth determine in fearefull and endlesse destruction The reason whereof is this First because in sinne eternal Iustice is offended Secondly wicked men if they might liue alwayes they would sin eternally and therefore are worthy at the last to be punished with death eternall Tim. Now tell vs the Instruction that we are to learn
both the duty and testimony of a truely deliuered sinner which hath indeed by the death of Christ escaped death Tim. But tell me what course sinners are to take that they may get the sound feeling of their owne woefull damnation due to their sinnes Silas It is no easie thing to get it nor euery sinners case to come by it yet I will commend vnto the sinner desirous to be humbled foure looking-glasses wherein if he vse often and intentiuely to behold himselfe hee may haply through Gods mercy attaine his desire to his euerlastaing good The first is Adams fall wherein hee shall see not onely himselfe depriued of all goodnes and exposed to all sin and misery but the whole race of mankind and al creatures in heauen and earth folded in gods fearefull malediction and vengeance The second is the curse of the Law in which he shall see God as a most terrible Iudge most seuerely denouncing vnto his Creature the worke of his hands all the miseries of this life bodily and spirituall which are innumerable separation in the end of life of the body from the soule which is terrible and after this life ended euerlasting destruction both of body and soule which is most horrible and all this euen for the least transgression of his Law Deut. 27 26. The third is the estate of a damned man in Hell where he shall see a liuely picture of misery it selfe to with a man for sinne chained vp in a prison where there is a continuall night and most lamentable roaring and outcries hauing for his companions the Diuell and his Angels and the Reprobate his tender flesh extreamely pained in euery ioynt and sinew his soulc lying in vnexpressable horror filled with hatred of God blasphemy and despaire fretting and vexing not so much in the sence of present punishment which yet is easelesse and endlesse as in remembrance of his exceeding losse beeing cast out of Gods kingdome without hope of recouery And here remember I pray that this woefull estate euery one hath deserued a thousand waies The fourth and last is the most bitter death and passion of our Lord Iesus wherein let him see and consider himselfe as principal debter and Christ but as his surety suffering for his sinne euen at the hands of his owne vassals the Iewes Gentiles most greeuous tants scornes and reproaches most smartfull buffeting whipping crowning and piercing with thornes speares and nayles in his head hands and feete his most tender parts and at the hands of his angry reuenging Father receiuing such inuisible strokes in his soule as drew from his body abundance of bloudy sweat in the garden and from his mouth a most dolefull complaint and crie vpon the Crosse My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Heere vpon if a man will consider this deepely that if Gods wrath did lye so heauy vpon Christ for sinne imputed who also had his diuine power to vphold his man-hood in suffering it how heauy will it lye when it lighteth vpon a meere man and that for his own sin This meditation may preuaile much to bring downe the stoutest and proudest heart and stomacke that is in the sight and feeling of his owne misery which by desart of sinne is due to him in iustice or if this doe it not the case is very hard for it is a signe of a full hard heart not to be touched with griefe for such greeuous things as the onely Sonne of God for our cause endured Tim. Now that you haue told vs how the Law doth kill vs by engendering in vs a sence of Gods wrath and eternall death let me heare you declare vnto me by what meanes sinne did kill Paul Silas Sinne deceiued him and so slew him deceitfull sinne killed him Tim. What is the instruction from hence Silas That sinne is a deceitfull thing may appeare by these three wayes First by the testimony of Scripture as Heb. 3 12 13. Take heed least any of you be hardened through the deceitfulnesse of sinne also in Ephe. 4 22. the lusts of sinne are called deceiueable lusts now whatsoeuer God saith is deceitfull must needs be so for hee cannot lye Secondly by the example first of Paul confessing that sinne deceiued him he being very wise learned and heedfull Secondly of Peter who was deceiued by his sinfull presumption Thirdly of Salomon and Dauid by incontinency Fourthly of Iudas who was deceiued by couetousnesse Lastly of Herod by pride Thirdly by reason because it is the brood of the Diuell that olde Serpent full of subtilty who deceiued the whole world by his guile and craft the Child being like his father such damme such broode Second reason sinne is in quality contrary to holinesse therefore as holinesse hath sincerity and truth so sinne hath deceit and guile annexed to it Lastly seeing it makes our hearts deceitfull therefore it selfe must needs be full of deceite For that which maketh a thing to be such it selfe is more such Quod facit tale id est magis tale Aristot. Tim. What hurt and daunger is there in being deceyned Silas From this deceite of sinne springs hardnesse of heart and spirituall deadnesse Heb. 3 13. And after this there followes eternall death without the mercies of God and great repentance Sil. Are all men deceiued alike Silas No the wicked are deceiued wholly willingly and vnto their destruction The elect in some things are deceiued by sin euen after calling but neuer wholly and finally Tim. After what sort and wayes doth sinne deceiue vs Silas First by making men thinke that they are aliue and happy when they are dead and miserable thorough sinne Secondly by causing them to neglect their inward thoughts and lusts resting in outward obedience onely as if that were enough and could iustifie them Thirdly by insinuating it selfe into their harts becomming more pleasant and delightfull to them by the prohibitions of the Law forbidding and condemning it By these three waies especially was Paul deceiued with sin Fourthly by blinding our iudgement by putting out the eyes of our minde that we should not be able to see it to be a sin in our selues which we see to be a sin in others not to be a fault in particular which men do know to be a fault in the generall As the couetous proud malicious will condemn couetousnes pride hatred in general yet perceiue not that their owne actions sauour of these vices Fiftly sin perswades mē that the things which the law forbids are good commodious for them as some kind oflyes and some litle breaking of the Saboth and vsury such like sin dooth often put on the name and countenaunce of vertue as pride of cleanlinesse niggardnesse of thrift great swearing and reuenge of manhood courage c. Seauenthly it turneth away our thoughts from thinking earnestly vpon the punishment due to sin Eightly when we do any good it maketh vs ascribe it to
is it that the Law cannot iustifie and make vs righteous seeing it doth teach a perfect righteousnesse Silas It is true indeede that the Lawe instructeth vs fully both what is to be done and what is to be auoyded but there are 3. other things required to the iustifying of vs which it is impossible for the Law to do for vs. As first to offer vs forgiuenesse of those thinges wee do against the Law which accuseth but absolueth not Secondly to worke faith in vs to lay hold vppon forgiuenesse being offred which the law cannot engender Thirdly to put strength and power into vs that we may be able to keepe all the commandements of the Law to the end of our life All which things are impossible to the Law because it only instructeth what to do but ministreth no strength to do that it bids It promiseth life to the doers threatneth death to the transgressors but offreth no power to sinners much lesse giues faith to apprehend it for this is the office of the Gospell 2 Cor. 3 9 7 8. The cause why these things are impossible to the Lawe is because it is weake that is vneffectual and feeble for these purposes which commeth not from the Law but from our flesh and corrupt nature Tim. What doth the Flesh signifie heere Silas That naughtinesse and sinfull corruption that through Adams fall passed thorough all mankinde and doth remaine still euen in men regenerate but it is corrected and reformed in part in them and that daily til it be abolished Tim. What is the effect and fruite of this remaining corruption and sinne Silas It doth make the members of Christ and newe borne Children of God vnable perfectly and fullie to keepe the Law As first because through force of this remaining corruption they do diuers things contrarie to the Lawe Secondly they leaue vndone manie good things commanded by the Law Thirdly in the good things which they do there is much imperfection and vncleannesse therefore it is impossible to bee kept of the most righteous that is In our creation it was possible and in state of glorification shall bee but in estate of our vnperfect Sanctification it cannot be Tim. Is it not a wrong to God to say that he hath giuen vs a Law impossible to be kept Silas No none at all First because in our Creation we receiued strength to keepe it which we lost through our owne default Shall a Landlord be blamed because the Tenant is vnable to pay his rent Secondly because in the estate of glorification wee shall haue power to keep it perfect for then our knowledge and loue of God and our neighbour shall be perfect Thirdly because in the estate of regeneration the godly may be saide after a sort and in some sence perfectly to keep it For the regenerating Spirit hath begunne in them obedience to the Law giuing them strength to desire and endeauour it Also their wants and failinges in their obedience are pardoned and he is saide to haue no sinne when that is not imputed which is done And lastly the perfect obedience of Christ is allowed vnto the faithfull Omnia mandata Dei inquit August fact a deputātur quando quicquid non sit ignoscitur Ti. In what sence is it thē that the law is imposs ble to be kept Silas The wicked which are strangers from Christ are absolutely vnable to do any part of it but breake it thoroughout Rom. 5 8. Secondly the regenerate and godly they are not able by grace inherent in their own persons perfectly to do it but faile in many things and sundry wayes 1 Iohn 1 7 8. Iames 3 2. Tim. Declare vnto vs the profit that we are to make of this Doctrine touching the impossibility of keeping the Law being iustified by it Sil. First it conuinceth and confuteth both the Pelagians and the Papist the one because they teach that men by the strength of nature are able to keep the commandements the other that by strength of grace the godly are not only able to keep the Law but to do more then the Law requireth Secondly it serues to humble vs much that we cannot keepe the Law and that thorough our sinfull weaknesse also to stirre vs vppe vnto Prayer for grace to yeelde better obedience vnto it seeking that strength from God which wee haue not in our selues to be able in some measure to yeelde obedience to the Law Thirdly it instructeth all the faithfull to know that iustification before God is not to be had by good workes because they are imperfect not answerable to the rigour of the Law and are all stayned by the corruption of the flesh mingled with them Fourthly this doth teach vs that seeing we cannot haue iustification from the Law therefore all men must bee content to deny themselues and go out of themselues and seeke perfect righteousnesse in another to wit euen from the Sonne of God sent into the world that he may be made man for vs and the end of the Law for righteousnesse to all which beleeue Tim. What are we to learne from these words that GOD sent his owne Sonne Silas These three seuerall Lessons First the distinction of the persons in the Trinity for if the Sonne be sent from the Father of necessity he is a person distinct from the Father which confuteth Sabelius who held a distinction not of persons but of names Secondly that Christ is the sonne of God otherwise then we are euen his own sonne that is consubstantiall and coequall with the Father contrary to the Arrians who denied the eternall Godhead of the Sonne whome they make an inferiour second created God that is indeede not a God at all Thirdly hence we learne that when the high and soueraigne cause of our saluation is sought for wee may not stay in Christ himselfe but arise vp vnto the goodnesse of God the Father sending his Son which confuteth such as will haue foreseene faith and workes to be the mouing cause of appointing vs vnto saluation when as Christ himselfe is not the impulsiue moouing cause of appoynting vs vnto saluation but Gods owne loue moued him to giue and send Christ vnto vs Iohn 3. 16. Tim. What is the vse of this third and last lesson Silas It doth admonish all the faithfull that since God freely out of his loue sent his Son for them therefore it is their duty to send their harts vnto him wholly to bee his as men send mutually gifts one to another Rom. 12. 1. Tim. What is meant here by the similitude of sinfull flesh Silas The meaning is that Christ being sent of his Father became a very man hauing the true nature of a man being like to all other men except sin also by flesh is here meant humane nature consisting of body and soule being considered without corruption of sin Tim Why doth he say in the similitude of flesh Silas To teach vs that Christes manhoode not onely seemed and appeared but indeed
was such as is the manhood and nature of euery other man Secondly to shewe vs that howsoeuer a naturall eye could see nothing but the forme of a man yet that he had another euen a diuine nature not to be perceiued but by the eye of faith Tim. Why is sin added here and put to flesh Sil. First because humane nature as we beare it is corrupted with sin but Christ tooke it pure without sin Secondly our nature as Christ tooke it though it were free from the contagion of sin yet it was not free from the effects and fruites of sin for he was subiect to hunger thirst cold nakednesse wearinesse and death it selfe which because they are the necessarie consequents of sin therefore are they here called by the name of sin Tim. What is the instruction that ariseth from these words being thus opened Silas That Christ was truely incarnate and made man for our sakes as God taking mercy on lost mankind is the efficient cause of our freedome so his Son sent is the materiall cause of our freedome Tim. Wherefore was the Son of God rather to take humane nature then the nature of Angels Silas Because the purpose of God was to redeeme and saue not the Angels but mankinde which as it doeth expresse the greatnes of Gods loue to man so it must greatly excite and stirre vp mans loue to God for it is very considerable that men and Angels are both sinners yet the remedy was allowed to vs. Tim. But wherefore was the Son of God to take mans nature pure without sin Sil. Because otherwise he could neither haue been made a sacrifice for vs nor righteousnesse to vs for had hee had our nature with the least sin hee could not onely haue bin no Sauiour to vs but himselfe should haue stood in neede of a Sauior and in stead of giuing righteousnesse to others must haue receiued righteousnes from another Tim. But how was it possible to seuer sin and our nature one from the other Sil. Well enough he that seuered them in the first Adam by creation could tell how to seuer them in the second Adam by incarnation as hee will at length seuer them in all beleeuers at their glorification sin being but an accident which may bee separated without hurt to the subiect Tim. What is the vse of this Sil. First to moue vs to blesse God who hath giuen vs a Sauior holy and separated from sin and sinners Secondly to hunger and thirst after the sanctity and purenesse of Christs humane nature seeing wee haue so great need of it to couer our most vnholy and defiled nature the infection whereof alone is enough to condemne vs without this remedy Tim. What was it that Christ did for vs being made man Sil. He did for sin condemne sin in the flesh Tim. What is meant here by condemne Silas Not to punish or exact punishment for sin but to abolish and take away sin at once out of mans nature as the word is vsed 1 Pet. 4. 6. condemnation being put for that which followes it as condemned persons vse to be taken out of the world that they may be no more so is sin from vs by the imputation of Christs perfectly sanctified manhood for though sin remaine in the godly yet it is as if it were not being not imputed as Augustine sayed Quicquid ille non imputare decreuit sic est quasi non fuerat Tim. What is to be vnderstood by this word when he sayth for sinne Silas Some interprete for sin of sin because sin did vniustly set vpon Christ to get him to dye and to bee crucified see Iohn 16 9. Secondly for sin by some doeth signifie for remission of sinnes Rom. 5 6 8. Thirdly some interprete for sin to be a sacrifice for sin 2 Cor. 5 21. but I take it this word for sinne must bee ioyned to the word sent and then it noteth the finall cause or ende for the which Christ became man namely to take away chase and driue sin out of our nature which hee tooke vpon him for this text speaketh of his incarnation and not of his sacrifice and death Tim. What is our instruction then from these last words Sylas This that all true Christians stand in extreame neede not onely of his passion and death in being made a curse or of his perfect obedience in doing the wil of God in his life but of his very incarnation and of his most holy and pure manhood because otherwise it is not possible that euer any beleeuing Christian should be saued but that they should all perish and Christ with whatsoeuer he is or hath as by testimony of Scripture giuen to vs ordained for vs and our Saluation Tim. Why doe ye say sa howe can they perish for whome Christ dyed and for whome he hath kept the law Silas Because none can haue eternall life in Heauen vnlesse they haue the absolute perfect righteousnesse which the law exacteth one principall part whereof is the perfect intregity of our nature our will and reason being conformed and fashioned agreeably to the perfect iustice of God reuealed in his law so as there bee not the least inclination or pronnesse to any euill but a through disposition to euery good thing This full perfection the law is not able as we haue heard to effect worke in vs because it is weake through our corruption wherby we are made vnable to answere it And therefore if we should not finde this perfect righteousnesse and integrity which the law requireth of them that are to liue for euer in the humane nature of Christ and haue it allowed and giuen to such as doc beleeue in him it were vnpossible that any should bee saued because nothing that is vncleane and vnholy shall enter into the new Ierusalem Reuel 21 27. and our nature euen after regeneration and faith it is still defiled by the remainder of sinne Howbeit Christ is not deuided he that hath one part of his Mediatorship hath the whole like a Ladder where no one stale can be lacking Tim. What profit is there to be made of this Silas First it teacheth Christians to be no lesse thankefull for Christs incarnation then for his passion Secondly it serucs to humble euen the godliest that are to thinke vpon their dwelling and remaining sinne for the abolishing whereof God must defcend and bee made man Thirdly it helpes to comfort the weake ones whē they are tempted to doubt of their saluation thrugh the in-bred corruption which they carry about them and prouokes them to sinne against God Let them by a true faith consider of Christ his most perfect naturall innocency that it is no lesse reckoned to them for healing their defiled nature then his obedience and sufferings for remission of actuall sinnes and acquiting them from eternall destruction DIAL IIII. Verse 4. That the righteousnesse of the law might be fulfilled Silas First it ouerthrowes all Popish additions of mens
as is in hungry men after meate and thirsty men after drink or wearied men after rest or in the sicke after health Secondly this desire is accompanied with an vnfaigned confession of particuler sinnes so farre as be knowne to vs and hearty bewayling of the deepe miserie due vnto them Thirdly there is wrought a perswasion that all their sinnes how great and many soeuer be pardonable being farre inferiour to the infinite mercies of God merites of Christ. Fourthly there followes an earnest and constant crauing of the forgiuenesse of them all Lastly there commeth the gift of a liuely faith assuring the Conscience that all are forgiuen and they fully reconciled vnto God whence ariseth great peace and rest with liberty and freedom to the soule And this faith in Gods promise is the testimony of the Spirit all which is shadowed out by the parable of the lost childe who felt a great neede of his Fathers reconciliation much desired it confessed himselfe vnworthy of it despaired not to finde it earnestly begged it with perswasion of it Tim. This Spirit of Adoption which is heere set as contrary to the Spirit of feare dooth it expell all feare where it is giuen Silas It doth expell all seruile feare though not vtterly as it is written Perfect loue casts out feare 1 Iohn 4 18. but it engendereth filiall feare as it is written There is mercy with thee that thou maist be feared Psal. 130 4. The adopted children of God haue then a mixt feare as they are not wholly free from feare of hell fire which serues them as a bridle and curbe to awe them and restraine them from sin yet they chiefely feare him because they would not offend his infinite goodnesse This feare is often commanded and they are often exhorted vnto it it hath many promises made to it in the word Tim. How may the children of God perceiue that they are endowed with this spirit of Adoption Silas Especially by that effect of calling vpon God for whereas the elect before they had this Spirite of adoption were afraide of God and did flye from him as from a most terrible Iudge example whereof we haue in Adam and Eue after their fall Gen. 3. being now adopted by grace the Spirite of God doth open their mouths to pray vnto God as children vnto a father with holy boldnesse Gal. 4 5. The reason heereof is because they being certaine that their sinnes bee forgiuen them and that God who was their enemy is reconciled therefore they may freely speake vnto him aa one friend vnto another and God is as ready to heare them as a father is to heare his owne deare Child Yea farre more ready to heare then his children are to aske preuenting their prayers oftentimes and alwaies granting them Tim. What vse is to be made of this point Silas First it confuteth such as teach that wee ought alwayes to doubt of Gods good will and of our owne adoption Secondly it comforteth such as haue the gift and willingnesse to pray because this is a certaine note vnto them that God is their Father Tim. Yet wicked men and hypocrites also Idolatrous and superstitious men doe pray Silas True yet Gods children alone can in truth say Abba father and in their prayers cry to God These two things godly confidence and feruency seuer the prayers of Gods children from all other who call vpon God eyther for fashion sake or for belly sake therefore coldly and without confidence Tim. But from whence doth arise this confidence and feruency which the faithfull exercise in their prayers Sil. There confidence doth spring first from the mercies of God he being pacified towards them in his Son Secondly from the truth of God promising to heare them for his Sons sake Thirdly from the merit of Christs intercession to whome the Father will deny nothing Their feruency also doth arise first from a true and particular sight and sense of their owne sinnes and miseries and secondly from the sound knowledge and meditation of the excellency of Gods graces which the more they are knowne and valued are the more cagerly thirsted after and desired Tim. What may wee gather from these things for our owne good Silas First the godly are instructed in all their prayers to prouoke themselues to earaest zeale and assiance by thinking seriously vpon the infinite mercies and promises of God the mediation of Christ and their own sinnes and miseries Secondly whensoeuer Gods childeren pray without consideration of these thinges they must needes pray vncomfortably and with weake confidence Thirdly from hence we may see that the prayers which be made to Saints to the Virgine Mary and to Angels that they come not from the Spirite of adoption which directs vs to pray vnto the Father but from a spirit of errour being indeed a doctrine of diuels Fourthly because we haue our adoption from Christ and his spirit therefore no vngodly men as Turkes and Iewes can call vpon God Fiftly seeing the godly are certain of God to be their Father there fore they may be also certaine of their adoption and consequently of their saluation because sonnes be heires The sonnes of this world cannot be so certaine of their Father as the faithfull bee of theirs Sixtly by the change of the person wee haue the Apostle woulde teach euery one to hope well of the adoption of other Christians and to bee assured of their owne hauing the testimony of the Spirit of Christ teaching them to call God Father Seauenthly the expressing of the name Father both by the Hebrewe and Greeke words teacheth that God is Father both of the Iewes and Gentiles which are indifferently partakers through faith of this adoption Lastly because Paul vseth heere this strange worde Abba wee cannot gather thence that the seruice of God should be in a strange tong as the Papists affirme directly against Gods commaundement 1 Cor. 14. 19. But these strange wordes were by vse and custome growne common and familiar being thereby commonly vnderstood and easie to be vnderstood therfore it was that both Hebrew in the Greek and the Greek in the Latine and English bee often kept in the naturall sound vntranslated DIAL XV. Verse 16. The same Spirit beareth witnesse with our Spirits that we are the children of God Tim. VVHat doth this text containe Silas A new reason to proue the beleeuing Romanes and al other the faithful to be the children of God It is proued by a double testimony one of Gods Spirite the other of our Spirit and in the mouth of two witnesses euery word or matter is confirmed Deut. 17 6. But all beleeuers haue two firme undeceiueable witnesses of their adoption the one without them and the other within them Therefore they may be and are certaine of their adoption that they indeed are Gods children The summe hereof is thus much that the Holy Spirite which stirres vp feruent prayer in the hearts of beleeuers doth beare witnesse with
many Israelites which were Abrahams children after the flesh do loose saluation Tim. What is the summe of this text Silas That the promise of grace and saluation was restrayned vnto Iacob by election onely before he was born not by his birth nor by his workes for then Esau should haue obtained the blessing promised who came of the same Parents and yet was reiected and hated of GOD therefore all which carnally come of Abraham be not the children of the promise Tim. How doth Paul knit this example to the former Silas By a gradation as a thing greater and stronger to proue his purpose that the promise of grace and saluation doth not indifferently and equally pertaine vnto all the posterity of Abraham but to such of them onely as were elect For the Iewes might obiect that Ismael was reiected because hee was borne of a bondwoman to wit Agar whereas no such thing could be alleadged in this example of Iacob and Esau who both came of Isaac Abrahams lawfull Son and of Rebecka at one time and by one birth yea and Esau was the elder of the twaine so as this example fits the Apostle much better to she we that the prerogatiue of carnal birth is not the cause of receiuing the promise Tim. Yea but the Iewes might alleadge that Esau being a prophane man and behauing himselfe ill was therefore reiected whereas Iacob was loued and had the effect of the promise because he was a good man and did well Sil. The Apostle meeteth with this obiection in saying that Gods purpose was declared touching them both ere euer they were borne and therefore their present good or euill works for they had done none when God had vttered his counsell of them could not moue God to loue the one and hate the other Tim. Yet it may be said that God decreed of them both for the fore-seene workes of them both Silas Paul denieth this saying it was not of workes and affirmeth the quite contrary that the purpose of sauing Iacob and of refusing Esau came of his free election whereby of his loue he chused the one not the other Thus whereas the Iewes stood much vpon the priuiledge of their birth and their works Paul reiecteth them both as no causes of Gods promises which are applied and take place by the decree of Gods election The mystery whereof vpon this occasion he beginneth to open both particularly by example and generally by testimony of Scripture verse 15 16. and in the rest of the Chapter Tim. What instructions are to be gathered from this Text thus vnfolded Silas That faith nor good workes neither present or foreseene are any cause why God electeth any vnto saluation And contrariwise infidelity and badde workes whether present or foreseene doe not moue God to refuse any man and cast him off from hauing any parte in Christ and the promises by him The reason is faith and good works doe proceede from election therefore cannot bee the cause thereof for one thing cannot bee the cause and effect in respect of another Now that faith and workes be effects see Acts 13 48. Titus 1 1. Ephe. 1 4. No man hath any good but what God purposed from euerlasting to put into him Secondly Gods election depends vpon his will onely verse 15. therefore not vpon foreseene faith and workes Thirdly infidelity foreseene and bad workes were not the cause that men were refused because all sinning in Adam God could see in whole mankind no other thing but vnbeleefe and concupiscence which hereditarily flowed from Adam vpon all his race and so all had beene reiected for sinne foreseene if any were cast out Tim. But if wicked men be destroyed for vnbeleefe and bad works then God decreed to destroy them in respect of these Sil. It is true so he did but hee refused and did not chuse them onely because hee would not chuse them without all respect to their ill qualities and works It is otherwise with the elect whom God did appoint in his eternall decree vnto saluation not in respect of their workes but in and for Christ yet so as hee purposed in time to call to iustifie and to sanctifie them ordaining to these things not for these things Tim. What vse of this point Silas It reproues such as tye Gods predestination to mens merites whereas it is independant and without all relation to the worthinesse and vnworthinesse of men Secondly it moueth the beleeuers to thanke God for their free election and to ascribe all to grace because free election is not onely in it selfe a great mercy but it is the spring of all other mercies both earthly and heauenly whatsoeuer For sinners beleeue and receiue the holy Ghost and are borne anew and blessed with repentance and good workes because they are Gods chosen and elect ones DIAL VI. Verse 11. For ere the children were borne and when they had neyther done good nor euill that the purpose of God might remaine according to election not by workes but by him that calleth Tim. VVHat is the drift of these words Silas To proue that God cannot be charged with failing of his word so long as he keepes it with the elect Tim. What is the meaning and substance of these words Silas That the saluation of beleeuers depends not at all on our selues but is all wholy to be ascribed to the election of God Whereas all men are alike by creation and nature and yet some beleeue doe good workes and are saued others beleeue not but liue wickedly and doe perish the cause of this difference is not in nobility of birth and bloud or dignity of workes as the example of Esau Iacob sheweth but in the election of God chusing some to life according to his will and refusing others because hee would not chuse them Summarily that which putteth the difference betweene one man and another all men beeing alike is Gods eternall election before all worlds Whence it is that some are not called to Christ and some be and of those which bee called some beleeue being elect some do not beleeue being not elect Election being the fountaine of all our weale therfore it would be taught distinctly and well vnderstood for it is a fundamentall doctrine reuealed in the Scripture Tim. From whence is this word Election taken Silas From the manners and affaires of men who will haue that to be firme and to continue which they haue by election chosen and vpon good aduice 〈◊〉 Whereas they are wont to alter such things which they rashly appointed but hold fast what by good election they haue purposed so are we to thinke of God of whom the Scripture speaks after the manner of men for our infirmity sake noting to vs in this word the stablenesse of his decree Tim. How manifold is Election Silas Two-fold one humane whereby men chuse whō and what they like aboue others And another diuine whereby God chuseth what
sake he maketh noble or base Eightly Paul saw no other cause of election but the will of God and it is dangerous to assigne that to bee a cause of election which Paul purposely entreating of this matter saw not this is to make our selues wise and him blockish nay our selues wiser then the Holy-Ghost Ninthly if the cause of election were workes or faith or vnbeleefe cause reprobation what need he say Oh the depth or obiect Is their iniquity with God and therefore it necessarily followeth that election is most free and absolute without any dependance vpon them Yet God did not chuse vs to the end without respect to the meanes for his decree concerneth both meanes and the end This is sufficient to stoppe the clamours of the Lutherans Tim. Doe ye thinke so of reprobation that it is free also without dependance on infidelity or ill workes fore-seene Silas In that some are not chosen to life it is without all respect of their vnbeleefe as a mouing cause but in that they are not onely refused but also appointed vnto destruction this is not without reference to infidelity sinne which as it is the proper cause of damnation so it moued God to ordaine to destruction but not to refuse and cast out from saluation for this was done to Esau ere he had done euill Secondly it is written God hardneth whom he will his will then is the high and first cause why men are not saued Thirdly God as a Potter may make vessels to ignominy for his wils sake Fourthly as we were corrupt in Adam God could see nothing in any man saue vnbeleefe and sinne And therefore if these had moued him not to chuse all had beene reprobated then Paul also should haue said that the purpose might remaine according to merite Lastly there is no vnrighteousnesse to cast off and refuse for sinne all will confesse this to bee iust Tim. What is the end or finall cause of election Sil. The vtmost end is the praise of his free grace Eph. 1. 5. hence elect are called vessels of mercy Rom 9 23. The nerest cause is mans saluation to attain eternal life and the final cause of reprobation is the praise of his iustice and the destruction of sinners Tim. What be the effects of election Silas Two First grace in this life as redemption by Christ vocation faith iustification adoption sanctification repentance good works perseuerance in grace Secondly vnspeakable and endlesse glory in heauen Tim. Are men and women elected to both these Sil. They be so for first Iacob and Isaac were chosen to the grace of the promise verse 8. but this comprehends al. Secondly it were absurd to separate the means from the end or end from the meanes Thirdly Scripture speaketh thus Acts 13 48. So many as were ordained to life beleeued Fourthly hec speaketh of election which is a preparation of the Vessell of mercie to glorie and which is ioyned with loue which is a willing of eternal life to men and all things which bring thither Tim. What vse of this point Silas It confuteth the Papists which say it is to grace and not to glory this they attribute to mans merits Secondly it reprooues such as thinke themselues elect to life they wanting notwithstanding the meanes of effectuall calling and good life Thirdly it comforts such as haue the means that they are sure they be elected to the end for meanes and end be linked together Ti. May they perish whō God hath chosen purposed to saue Sil. No they cannot for the purpose remaines firme Secondly God is vnchangeable and his loue is so too Thirdly then God should not be Almightie if he were not able to saue such as hee was once willing to saue Fourthly there would be no sound comfort to the godly except this foundation of God remaineth sure God knoweth who are his 2 Tim. 2 19. Tim. May such as be elect know themselues to be such Silas They may know it by their calling therefore is election heere ioyned with calling and before Rom. 8 28 30 because the counsel of election being hid before in the counsell of God is manifested in our calling Tim. What should this teach vs Silas First that such as haue but an outwarde calling by the Gospell ought to hope well of their owne election that it cōmeth of his purpose to saue them by saith Secondly because many are called which be not chosen it should stirre vp all sorts of Christians to examine their owne hearts whether they haue obeyed their Calling hauing their hearts changed from vnbeleefe and loue of sinne to faith and loue and practise of righteousnesse Thirdly let such as yet feele not this calling not dispair for who knoweth what may be tomorrow God calleth and turneth at all houres Mat. 20 1 2. Example in Paul and the theefe c. Tim. What are we to thinke of the election of others Silas First let euery man be most careful of his owne to assure it to himselfe by graces of the Spirit 2 Pet. 5 6 7. Secondly in charitie we are to hope well of all which heare the word and outwardly obey it 1 Thess. 1 6. Leaue to God the iudgement of certainty and the searching of hearts DIAL VII Verse 12 13. It was sayde vnto her the elder shall serue the yonger as it is written I haue loued Iacob hated Esau. Tim. VVHat is the end and scope of these words Silas To declare that the difference betweene one man and another touching grace and eternall life depends onely vppon Gods purpose and election and not vpon our worthinesse or vnworthinesse This is declared by two Oracles of God or testimonies of Scripture The first is taken out of Genes 25 23. The latter is taken out of Mal. 1 2. Tim. What is the meaning of the former place of Genesis Sil. That Iacob the younger brother should be Lord and Esau the elder should serue him Tim. This difference might come by chance or by their own deserts Silas Not so for first it was spoken ere they had done good or euill Secondly by another place of Malachy it is shewed that Iacobs dominion came from Gods loue and Esaus bondage from his hatred therefore it is Gods onely purpose which discerned between them and consequently betweene all other men Tim. But doe these words taken out of Genesis fitly belong to proue Gods eternall election to be the soueraigne cause of eternall saluation in heauen Silas Yea they are so or else Paul being ledde by the Spirit of God would not haue alleadged thē so for it were blasphemy against Christ to say that Paul did alleadge the Scriptures false or vnfitly being an Apostle of Christ who in his doctrine was priuiledged from erring as all other Apostles were Tim. Tell vs then how the lordship of Iacob and seruitude of Esau may proue that for which it is cited men may bee poore and lye in prison and be
things belong to God and Prouerbes He that searcheth the glory shall be confounded with the maiesty also Esay 6 2. the Cherubins couering their faces before the throne of God teach vs this modesty that we should not pry into that which God will haue kept secret from vs. This doctrine may bee set foorth by the comparison of a weake eye vnable to looke on the sun in his beauty and strength or of a simple or ignorant Boore presuming to sift and scan the important affaires of Princes and States euen such madnesse is it in silly man to reason and striue against God thinking to bring his actions and decrees vnder our controulement and censure as if all without our reach ought to bee reiected Tim. What profit is to be made of this instruction Silas First it serues iustly to reprooue the audacious wickednesse of such men as are too busie to examine God and his wayes why hee made the world no sooner what hee did and where hee was before the worlde why hee made them men and women why hee made some poore and not all rich why he would not chuse and saue all why hee suffered Adam to fall sithence he might haue kept him from sin c. Such persons little consider how easie a thing it is for that infinite maiesty to confound these curious fooles with his very becke Secondly the godly are here to bee exhorted to bridle this wickednesse in themselues by a due meditation of Gods infinite greatnes compared with their owne most pittifull smalnesse being in respect of him not so much as a droppe of water in respect of the whole sea or as a little dimme candle to the light of the sun How small a portion of that incomprehensible wisdome doe we see This therefore will bee our wisedome to labour in al sincerity and humbly to know beleeue and doe that which wee by his word shall perceiue to belong to vs. DIAL XIII Verses 20 21. Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it why hast thou made mee thus Hath not the Potter power ouer the clay to make of the same lumpe one vessell to honour and another to dishonour Tim. VVHat doth this text containe Silas The reall answere of Paul to the thing obiected to wit cruelty in God if for his very will sake he should chuse some to life and harden others The former answere was personall beating down the presumption of such men as would call the workes of God to account now he satisfieth the very matter obiected Tim. What is the summe of this reall answere which Paul makes to the thing it selfe Silas Thus much that though God shew mercy where hee will and shew no mercy where hee will not yet none may repine at him or accuse him of cruelty The cause here of is the most high and absolute power that God hath ouer his creature to dispose of it as pleaseth him himselfe being the supreme cause of all and independant all other things rather depending on his pleasure Tim. In what manner or forme is this set downe by the Apostle Silas By a parable or similitude wherein men are likened to a pot of clay and God to a Potter The substance whereof is thus much that as a pot may not finde fault with the Potter howsoeuer hee make it because hee hath full power ouer the clay to make what hee will with it so God hath absolute power ouer men to dispose of them as he liketh either to death or life and therefore hee cannot be charged with cruelty though he reiect and cast off some for his meere pleasure sake This comparison our Apostle borroweth from other places of Scripture as namely from Esay 45. 9. and Iere. 18. 1. 2 3. Tim. Doth this comparison hold in all things doth God man agree in euery thing as doth the Pot and the potter Silas No they differ in these things First the potter hath matter to wit clay prepared to his handes God made man of nothing Secondly man hath vnderstanding and will the clay hath not so much as anie motion Thirdly it is a greater matter to destroy a man than a pot of clay Similitudes saith Chrysostom are not of force touching all parts for thē many absurdities would followe it is sufficient to holde in that for which it is brought Tim. In what things doth this similitude consist Silas First as sundry pots be made out of one lumpe so all men are made out of one masse whether we consider men in the estate of their creation or corruption yet the Originall beginning of all men as touching their bodies is all one and the same to wit clay or slime Secondly the power and right that God hath ouer men is as great as any potter can haue ouer the pot yea and much greater without comparison Thirdly the pot if it could speake may not reason with the Potter why was I made so and not so neither may man reason with God why he made him thus or thus Lastly as the Potter of what forme soeuer the pot be made taketh nothing frō it so neither doth God take any thing from man what end soeuer he appoint him vnto Man was beholden to God for whatsoeuer hee is or hath but man gaue nothing to God Tim. To what scope and marke doth this similitude tend Silas Not onely to checke such as repine at Gods eternall decree of election and reprobation but to cleare this decree from all suspition of cruelty and tiranny because as his mercy is arbitrary so his right in and power ouer his creatures is absolute Tim. Now tell vs what instruction we are to learne from this latter end of the 20. verse Silas That it is not lawfull for men to contend or striue with God about-any thing which hee decreeth before all times or which he doth in time Tim. Howe may this doctrine bee fitly gathered from this text Silas In this wise by an argument a minori if the pot must rest in the will of the Potter without questioning or expostulating why it was made in this base forme or to such a vile vse much more are men to be satisfied with the will of their creator without repining or reasoning against it if it be an vnworthy and vnreasonable thing for the pot to question with his Former much more vnmeet is it that man should question with his Maker Tim. What may be the reason of this doctrine Silas First because God himselfe being most iust his will is the highest and most perfect rule of al righteousnes insomuch that whatsoeuer it bee that is once knowne to bee willed of God must without ali question and dispute bee helde for most vpright and iust and cannot bee but a most grieuour sinne to quarrell with him or to answer him againe Tim. What vse is to be made of this first doctrine Silas First it serueth to stop the mouthes of all such as cauill at the doctrine of Gods most free
causes in respect of the reprobate Silas There be three mentioned in this Text. First to shew his wrath against their sinnes Secondly to make knowne his power by breaking them not withstanding their obstinacy against him Thirdly the abuse of his long suffering and lenity Vpon these grounds and for these ends God reiecteth some and is auenged on them Therefore his dealing is not tyrannicall but most iust Tim. Expound the words and first tell vs what is meant here by wrath Silas First Gods iust displeasure conceiued against the reprobate for sinne Secondly the paine or vengeaunce due thereunto Tim. What meaneth this to shew wrath Sil. First to ordaine them to this punishment Secondly in due time to inflict it vpon them most iustly Tim. What doctrine 〈◊〉 from 〈◊〉 Silas That God is most iustly offended with the reprobate for sinne and wil most seuerely reuenge it in them The reason heereof is because sinne is 〈◊〉 to the nature of God Secondly it is the office of diuine iustice to take vengeance on sinne else in vaine were God called the iudge of the world Gen. 18 Rom. 3. Tim. What vse are Christians to make of this doctrine Silas First it strengthens our Faith concerning the righteousnesse of God For sithence he neither punisheth the wicked nor euer meant to doe it but in regard of their sinnes deseruing it we are therefore to beleeue him to bee righteous whatsoeuer corrupt reason obiect against it Secondly it stirreth vp to repentance and to hatred of sinne because God so abhorreth it that he wil eternally plague it euen in his own and most noble creature Act 17 30. Thirdly it should moue all to dread the fearefull iustice of God if Beasts dread the roaring of a Lyon Amos 〈◊〉 4. how much should flesh dread that iust and terrible God Tim. What is the second end or finall cause why God reiecteth and destroyeth some Silas To make his power knowne which is a thing most iust that God should declare and manifest his power to his owne praise and glory Tim. But how is Gods power shewne vpon the Reprobate Silas Heerein that howsoeuer they be many and of great might yet God is mightier then they being able to put them downe and throwe them to destruction which turneth as to the praise of his iustice so of his power treading downe all thinges which resist it as it is written All the Aduer sar es of Iehouah shall perish none shall stand before him when he is angry 1 Sam. 2 10. Psa. 37. And Now is the Axe laide c. Mat. 3 10. Tim. What is the doctrine which ariseth from hence Silas This that the vtmost end of reprobation is the manifestation of Gods power and not simply the destruction of the Reprobate which is the nearest end in respect of the men themselues and is no further respected of God then as it tends to the declaration of his power and Iustice. The reason of this doctrine is because else in vain had God created the world if it had not bin to manifest his glorious properties whereof his power is one Secondly it was his will by this meanes to shewe forth his power and why might he not Tim. What vse of this Doctrine Silas First Gods Children must in the ruine of the reprobate finde cause to magnifie God As Moyses and Mirian did praise God Exod. 15. for the temporall calamity of Pharaoh and his hoast in the redde Sea so the godly must praise him much more for the eternall destruction of the Reprobate in hell insomuch as out of it hee worketh his owne praise Reuel 11 17 18. Secondly God being stronger then man he is more to be feared then all men This reproues the fearefull and iustifyeth Gods iudgements against them and it comforteth the faithfull to consider that they haue such a strong patron to vphold them and put downe their enemies were they as strong as Pharaoh and all Egypt Tim. What is the third cause why God takes vengeance on the Reprobate Silas Because they abuse his suffering and long patience whereby he spared them when hee might strike them dead Tim. What is the Doctrine from hence Silas That God is very patient not onely towardes his Children 2 Pet. 3. but euen towardes his verie enemies Acts 13. Psal. 103. The reason heereof is to giue them space of repentaunce and to take all excuse from them il they be obstinate Rom 2 4 5. Rom. 3. Tim. Shew vs what vse we are to make of this point Sil. Gods Ministers and Children must by the example of their Father learne patience towards those that be euill 2 Tim. 2 24. Col. 3 12. So long as there is any cause to hope that by our sufferance there is any good to bee done vpon them but if they growe more obstinate by our lenity then obey that in Math. 7 7. Tim. What other doctrine from hence Silas It is a fearefull marke of a reprobate alwaies to abuse Gods patience to the hardning of themselues in their euils because none but they do it as none but Gods children can profit by it to amendment of life Tim. What vse of this point Silas It serues for a trial and examination of our selues whether we be our of the ranke of reprobates namely if we finde that we haue profited by the patience and long sufferance of God towards vs to the reformation of our wayes also it serues for terror vnto such as are not made the better by the patience of God towards them And lastly it serues for comfort to such as are bettered by his long-suffering and kindnesse thereby learning more to fear the offending of such a gracious God This is a good token and very comfortable Tim. Shew vs why reprobates are called vessels of wrath Silas Vessels they are called in respect of Gods preordination and creation He fore-appointed and made them to some speciall vse as vessels be euen to the setting foorth of his power and iustice as was saide before Vessels of wrath in regard of their owne sinnes whereby they corrupted and made themselues worthy of his wrath and punishment Tim. What is meant by prepared and by whom are they prepared to destruction Silas To be prepared signifies to be made fit meet before hand and this is done partly by God eternally reiecting them creating them in time permitting them to fall in Adam and iustly hardening them for resisting his will Secondly by Sathan solliciting them to sin and inspiring into them sinne-full motions obdurating them also in sinfull courses Lastly by themselues in regard of their naturall corruption and voluntary deprauation following the lustes of their ignorance with greedinesse Thus in regard of creation and the end to the which they are ordained reprobates are prepared of God as also in regard of sinne as it is a meanes to bring them to that end but respecting sinne as it is sinne which they bring of their owne so
First it cleares Gods iustice against such as fasten the blame of their destruction vpon Gods seuerity because hee hardeneth and destroyeth none but such as by their owne malice haue deserued it Secondly it prooueth the Papists slanderers and false accusers for they are not ashamed to write of the Ministers of the Gospel that wee teach God to bee the chiefe author and proper cause of hardnesse euen as it is a sinne whereas with one consent we all doe teach the proper cause of vnbeleefe and sinne as it is a sinne to lurke in our owne nature and doe wholly discharge God of this God neyther willeth approueth nor worketh sinne saith Philip Melancton vpon the first Chapter to the Romanes Euery one sinneth willingly saith Peter Martyr and no man is compelled of God to sinne vpon the 9. Chapter of Iudges The originall of sinne is not in God saith Caluine vpon Iames 1 13. Wee hold him for impious and blasphemous faith Beza contra Castil which saith there is iniquity with God yet both Dureus the Iesuite and the Rhemish Priestes doe charge vs that we doe make God the proper authour and worker of hardnesse of heart and the actiue cause of sinne Yea hereupon Stapleton the Diuinity reader at Doway inferreth that the God of the Catholikes and the God of the Protestants is not one For saith hee the Catholikes God is not the cause of sinne but the God of the Protestants is so which is a wicked calumniation may be iustly retorted thus The true God allows no Masse Transubstantiation Purgatory prayer to or for the dead merites c. Tim. But you sayd that spirituall blindnes and hardnes proceedeth from Sathan how proue you that Silas First from the text which maketh the slumber or sencelesnesse of the Soule in heauenly matters to be an effect of the euill spirite sent by God into the wicked to make them more blinde and obstinate then they were afore Also it is written 2. Cor. 4 4. that Sathan doth blind the mindes of the wicked and 1. Kings 22 22. Sathan is sent of God with authority to leade into error and blindnes that wicked King Ahab Tim. But how is Sathan the cause of hardnes of heart Sil. As a tempter and instigator and inspirer to breathe and droppe in vngodly and vnrighteous cogitations into wicked mens hearts as liquor is distilled and dropped into a vessell Hence hee is sayed to woorke in the children of disobedience Ephesians 2 2. and to bee effectuall in the wicked strongly to delude them 2. Thes. 2. 9. and to haue entred into Iudas by his suggestion to encrease his malice against Christ. Tim. Is this power giuen to Sathan ouer any which are born of God Silas No ouer none of them but ouer the reprobate only for it is written that that wicked one toucheth them not 1. Iohn 〈◊〉 8. also by watchfulnesse and prayer they are kept from falling into his snares though they bee sore and often tempted Mat. 6 13. and 26. 41. His tyranny is exercised onely vppon and ouer them which are addicted and wholly giuen to disobedience ouer the reprobate in whome hee raigneth and worketh euen at his pleasure 2. Thes. 2. 10. Thereason here of is because wicked men are worthily committed to Sathan to be gouerned by him because they want only and wilfully shake off the regiment of God and will not bee ledde by his worde and Spirite Psalme 2 3. That which Pharaoh spake with his mouth the same all wicked men thinke in their harts and say in their soules Who is the Lorde that wee should obey him And therefore they haue an euill Spirite sette ouer them as it did happen vnto Saul who resisted the good Spirite of GOD and had therefore an euill Spirite sent to rule and vexe him Tim. What is the profit to be made hereof Silas It should teach all Christians willingly to obey God labouring to keepe his worde and suffering it to gouern their wayes lest after their deseruings he do put them into the hands and power of Sathan to be by him carried along vnto destruction for there is no remedy such as cast off the yoke and gouernment of Christ must be put vnder Sathans rule and dominion Tim. Why did you affirme that God was the cause of a blind and hardned heart Sil. Because the Scriptures both in this Text and in innumerable other places doe attribute it to God in Esay 6. 9. God commands Esay to goe and make their hearts fatte and Esay 29. 10. the Lorde is sayed to couer them with the Spirite of slumber and to shut their eyes and Esay 19 14. the Lord mingled amongst them the Spirite of errour and often in Exodus it is affirmed of God that he hardned Pharaohs heart of Sihon King of Hesbon that the Lord God hardned his Spirite and made his heart obstinate Deut. 2. 31. also Rom. 1 24. that God deliuered vp to vile affections c. and 2. Thes. 2 11. that God sent strong delusions that they should beleeue lyes and Iohn 12 40. God hath blinded their eies and hardned their hearts These and many other texts shew that God hath a hand and a worke in the hardning of sinners else wee should deny the word of God and take from God more then halfe the gouernment of the world if wee should deny him to haue an operation in the sinfull workes of the wicked whose soules and bodies are subiect to God who made them and are to be disposed by him Tim. Will not this bring in God to be the author and cause of sin seeing hardnes of heart and blindnes of minde is a sinne and if it be of God then God doth worke sinne Silas No not so this will not follow hee is the author of the iudgement but not of the sinne There bee two things to be considered in hardnesse of heart The first is apostasia the repugnancy or aberration from the will of God this God neither willeth approueth nor worketh but abhorreth and punisheth it as comming from Sathan and from the corruption of mens harts and being contrary to his image and worde The other is antimisthia Rom. 1 27. the recompence or iudgement which is executed when a sinner that was blinde and obstinate before is further indurate and blinded as a reward due to his contempt of God Of this punishment and due recompence God is the authour and cause for it is a iust thing with God to punish sin with sinne lesser with greater former with latter sinnes All punishment being an act of iustice is good Therefore sinne as it is a punishment commeth from God and not as it is a transgression for so it proceeds from Sathan and the wicked Thus Augustine teacheth Pharaoh sayeth he hardneth himselfe libero arbitrio and God hardened him iusto suo indicie againe God hardeneth not as an euill auth our but as a righteous iudge who though hee doeth not instill any sinne into the creature
the great fall and misery of the Iewes his owne and onely people for many thousand years endowed with innumerable priuiledges as in Rom. 9 5 6 7. yet the greatest part of the whole Nation was fallen from God into extreame desolation The reason heereof is the malice and infidelity of the Iewes striuing against Christ the Sonne of God and his Gospell preached by himselfe and his Apostles and calling them sweetly vnto saluation see verse 20. Tim. What vse is to be made of this doctrine Silas It warneth all men to stand in awe of Gods seuerity and to keepe from sinne through feare of his iustice Psal. 4 5. How will he spare thee when hee did not spare a whole Nation how will hee pitty a wilde branch which did cut off the true Oliue Therefore feare him all yee people because he iudgeth without respect of person 1. Pet. 1 17. The second vse is to exhort vs to beware as of all sinne so chiefely of vnbeleefe which thrust Adam out of Paradice the Iewes out of the Church and out of heauen too and tumbled them downe to hell Reue. 21 8. Vnbeleefe most dishonoureth God most hurteth men beeing the roote of all sinnes and cause of temporall and eternall torments therefore we ought much mislike it and mightily striue against it Tim. What is the second doctrine Silas That the Iewes shall be restored to grace towards the end of the worlde and that not by two or three or a few but by great companies As the whole nation in a manner departed from Christ so in a manner shall the whole nation returne to him the proofe heereof is in this verse in the word abundance and in verse 26. Tim. What profit is to be made heereof Silas It commends the immeasurable mercy of God in deliuering such a rebellious and forlorne people Secondly his incredible power beeing able to call vnto Christ a people that despised and strongly resisted him as if he should raise the dead out of the graue Lastly seeing God is willing to pitty them it behoues vs so to doe and earnestly to pray to God for their recouery and not to despaire eyther of our selues or others beeing very greeuous sinners before God Tim. What is the third doctrine Silas That the true riches of a Christian is not in gold or siluer c. but in the multitude of the faithfull and plentiousnesse of Gods graces in them 1. Cor. 15. Ephe. 3 16. Reue. 3 18. The reason is because all other riches are earthly and vanishing but these are from heauen and therefore euerlasting Tim. What is the vse of this doctrine Silas It serues to call our mindes from corruptible riches to fixe them vpon incorruptible to labour to bee rich in Christ not to the world as Christ counselleth Mat. 6 19. Lay not vp treasure c. Secondly to strengthen those in their good resolution which for the riches of Christ haue learned to contemne the world for they haue with Mary chosen the better part which shall neuer be taken from them Tim. What is the fourth doctrine Sil. That the conuersion of one hindereth not the conuersion of another but rather much furthereth the same as it is written of the Gentiles that it shoulde much helpe their saluation to see the Iewes generally conuerted In the state of this worlde the preferring of one often crosseth the preferment of another but it is contrary in the state of grace The reason is because the more be conuerted and the more full the body of the Church is they doc the more abound in mutuall help As in an army amongst many Souldiours one succoureth another and amongst many trauailers one encourageth another Tim. What fruite may wee reape by the knowledge of this trueth Sil. It serues to prouoke all Christians to pray and seek for the turning many vnto God that they may be the stron ger Secondly to praise God heartily for such as bee called out of darknes to light as Paul often doth for the Gentiles whereof see the proofe in his Epistles to the Philippians and Colossians Lastly to take heede wee enuy not the repentance of any but rather to reioyce at it after the Angels example who are glad of the conuersion of a sinner Luke 15 10. DIAL XI Verse 13. 14. For in that I speak to you Gentiles in as much as I am the Apostle of the Gentiles I magnfie mine office to try if by any meanes I might prouoke the of my flesh to follow them and might saue some of them Tim. WHat doth Paul performe in this text Silas First hee proueth the sentence which he put forth before touching the saluation of the Iewes by their emulation of the beleeuing Gentiles verse 13. 14. Secondly hee comforteth the Iewes by giuing them hope of being restored to Christ before the end of the world Tim. By what argument doeth Paul proue that the conuersion of the Gentiles shall turne to the saluation of the Iewes Silas By a reason taken from his owne example or from the end of his owne Ministery among the Gentils which was by conuerting the Gentiles to prouoke many of the Israelites to follow them The reason standeth thus The end which God propounded to his own counsell in reiecting the Iewes and which I set before mine eyes in my Ministery and preaching must needes be attained vnto But as God in his counsell so I in my doctrine haue propounded this end that the Iewes might be brought at last to desire grace and be saued by means of that grace giuen to the Gentiles Therefore it is certaine that at the last many Iewes shal bee saued Otherwise the end both of Gods decree and my doctrine should be frustrate which cannot be Tim. Vpon what grounds doth Paul comfort the Iewes in the 14. verse Silas Vppon this ground that seeing reconciliation came to the world of the Gentiles by their fall therefore howsoeuer their case seemes to be desperate as of dead men yet God will quicken them that they may be partakers of the common reconciliation Tim. Why dooth Paul call himselfe the Apostle of the Gentiles Silas Because hee was of God appointed to bee a preacher to the Gentiles as Peter was to the Iewes Gal. 2 7 8. 1 Tim. 2 7. Tim. Wherefore doth Paul direct his speech to the Gentiles in this sort Silas By this insinuation to creepe into their mindes and the more to knit their heart to him as one that was ordained to set forwards their saluation Tim. What is the doctrine from hence Silas That Ministers of the word must take all occasions to witnesse their lone to their flocke And secondly that it behooues the people to bee perswaded of the good affection of their Teachers towards them The reason heereof is because the doctrine of godlines will more easily pierce the mindes of the hearers if they bee well affected towardes
world And reconcilement is put for saluation wherof our atonemēt with God by Christ is the chiefest part because a sinner entreth then into the estate of saluation when sinnes are pardoned through Christ. Tim. But how may the casting away of some be the reconciling and sauing of others seeing euill must not bee done that good may come of it Silas First the casting away of the Iewes as it comes from God had the nature not of an euill but of a good worke because it was the execution of his Iustice vpon them for their vnbeleefe Secondly it was not properly the cause of the Gentiles saluation but accidentally insomuch as the Iewes being cast out by that occasion the Gentiles were called to Christ who could not be called till they were reiected by reason that the Iewes malice was such as made them to contemne the grace of Christ and to enuy that the Gentile should bee partakers of it Neither would they enter nor suffer others as a Dogge in the manger which neyther eateth the Hay nor suffereth the Oxen to eate it therfore as by tumbling down the dogge the beast comes vnto the foode so by casting off the stubborne Iewes the Gentiles found enterance both into the estate of Grace and Reconciliation with God Tim. What instructions haue wee from the former part of this Verse Silas First that God can turne the greatest euill to much good for his children the reason is his most admirable wisedome and goodnesse euen as Satan by his very great malice and subtilty can so poison the best things as they proue hurtfull to the wicked Tim. What is the vse to be made of this point Silas First to mooue vs to loue praise and admire the most singular loue and wisedome of God Secondly to labour after Gods example to make benefit of all euils which happen to our selues or others euen of our owne sinnes and of the transgressions of other men to make vs more humble and watchfull thereby for the time to come Tim. What other Lesson learne we from the beginning of this verse Silas That the summe of the Gospell is to preach reconciliation with God to wit that of sinners enemies and vngodly being without God and true life subiect to wrath and death for sinne wee are receiued to fauour and become friends children and heyres of life through Iesus Christ beleeued in See 2 Cor. 5. what Paul saith of God in verses 18 19. and of the Apostles and other Ministers verse 20. Tim. What be the parts of reconciliation Silas Two First remission of sins or not imputing our faultes with imputation of Christ his perfect iustice in keeping the Law vnto beleeuing sinners Secondly Sanctification in killing the strength of sin and quickening the soule by works of righteousnesse in the Spirit Rom. 6 2 3 4. Remission takes away the guilt and paine of sinne Sanctification remoues the dominion kingdome of sinne that it raigne not Rom. 6 12. and is a necessary companion of remission and fruite of reconciliation with God 1 Cor. 1 30. Tim. What profit is to be made of this point Silas That Preachers ought diligently to teach this Doctrine of reconcilement and the people to learne it that they may be throughly acquainted with Gods mercies to their comforting after heauinesse for sinne and their own miseries to their humbling after grace bestowed on them For as nothing will so cheare vp a troubled spirit as the declaration of the sweete sure mercies of Christ vnto firme and full attonement with God so nothing is more auailable to humble them thē the remembrance of their vnhappy condition in being strangers from God Tim. Come to the latter part of this verse and tel vs what is meant by receiuing as also by life Silas Heere the effect or consequent is put for the cause or antecedent which is an effectuall calling or receiuing of the Iewes into the Christian Church and by life is meant the quickning by grace to liue to God being before dead in trespasses Thus Oecumenius expounds this place What saith hee shall bee their assumption but this that we may say of him that assumeth or receyueth that he reuiueth them being dead in sinnes This speech is borrowed from the last great resurrection of the body whereunto the Scriptures do often resemble the restitution of the Iewes both from their bodily and spirituall calamities See Esay 26 19. Hos. 13 14. Ezek. 37 11 12 c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 11 12. to teach vs that the restitution of the Iewes beeing spiritually dead to the faith of Christ in the end of the world shall be as certaine and sure as that the corporally dead shal be raised out of their graues at the last day which is an Article of our faith Tim. What else are we taught from hence Silas That in all men naturally there is no more strength to do a good worke no not to thinke a good thought pleasing God then there is force in a deade man to do any worldly worke Iohn 15 5. 2 Cor. 3 4. 1. Cor. 2 14. This confuteth the counsell of Trent which teacheth that wee haue power if we will to receyue grace offered to beleeue and repent when wee are exhorted Session 6. But this is false because God must draw vs to Christ Iohn 6 44. also work in vs both the will and deede Phil. 2 13. and because of our wil being dead God is not onely to helpe it but to reuiue vs by putting as it were a new soule of grace into vs. This must stirre vs vp to giue the whole praise of our newe birth to God as Col. 1 21. Ephe. 1. 1 2 3. Againe from hence we may learne that wee may not despaire of the saluation of any either of others or our own how hopelesse soeuer For if God can reuiue the Iewes now sixeteene Ages rotten in the graue of sinne then how much more others also see Iohn 5 25 28. Tim. What Vse of this last point Silas This must nourish a charitable opinion of the greatest sinners and preserue men in hope of thēselues so they do not deferre but betimes endeauour to turne from sinne and seeke to God who is rich in mercie and power whose example should teach vs not to be cruell and rigorous as many Christians are being far vnlike to God who enclineth to pity pardon and to saue euen most for lorne offenders 〈◊〉 Whereas many thorough hardheartednesse be so implacable as nothing will appease them no 〈◊〉 and confession after crimes yea sundry Parents be heerein wodrthy to be blamed that as some are too indulgent so others too too seuere refusing to take to fauour their relenting and repenting children Oh what would become of themselues if God so deale with them But there is much mercy with God and plentifull compassions so ought there also to bee with men DIAL XIII Verse 16. For if the first fruites be holy so is the whole lumpe and if
the roate be holy so are the branches Tim. VVHat do these words performe Silas A proofe of the former reason touching the vniuersall restoring of the Iewes vnto grace before the end of the worlde where Paul meant both to comfort the Iewes and to warne the Gentiles that they do not proudly contenme the Iewes This proofe is taken from force of the league and promises made to Abraham and to other antecessors of the Iewes who be beere compared vnto the first fruites and roote and the Iewes which came of these antecessors vnto the lumpe and branches The proofe stan deth thus The Iewes are an holy nation by the promises made to their Fathers therefore God will not cast them away 〈◊〉 but as the first fruites and roote being holy doe make the lumpe and branches holy so Abraham and the fore-fathers of the Iewes being holy by vertue of Gods couenant to bee their God will cause holinesse in Gods good time to be deriued to their posterity for there is like condition of causes and effects of roote and branches Tim. Vpon what parts doth this Text consist Silas Vpon two comparisons the first whereof is taken from the obseruation of the Mosaicall Law touching first fruites the other from naturall experience of the root and the branches It is the nature of the root to draw good sap out of the ground and to disperse it into the stocke and braunches to make them fruitfull Therefore what the roote is such will be the branches if the roote be sappy and full of good iuice it wil cause good nourishment to the tree and plentifulnes of good fruites Tim. What was the Law to be obserued by the Iew touching first fruites Silas This of al the encrease of the earth God commanded the first fruites to be giuen him as Num. 15 20. Leuit. 23 10 11. Also when they made a masse of dowe there was a part for God whereof were sweete cakes or Shew-bread made to set before the Arke this done the rest of their fruite and their bread was sanctified vnto them that is the vse and eating of their fruite and bread became holy and wholsome Tim. For what causes did God ordaine this Lawe of first fruites Silas For sundry good purposes and causes First that by such a ceremony the Iewes might know and acknowledge that it is God to whom they owe thanks for all their fruites as being his free guift as worldly Princes will haue their seruants to pay some peny a yeare for some great Lordship bestowed on them onely to testify their dependance vpon their Soueraigne and not to enrich themselues so it it heere Secondly by such Oblations the holy Ministery of Priests and Leuits with their families were maintained and there is such great manifolde and necessary vse of the Ministery of the word as men are to vphold that though vnto their great cost Gal. 6 6. 1 Corin. 9 5 6 7 8 9. Thirdly in all their first fruites were represented Christ the first borne of euerie creature and the first fruites of them which tise againe from the dead whereby all the faithfull are sanctified to an happy resurrection 1 Cor. 15 20. Lastly the first fruits were a type figure of the estate of the Iewish Church wherein the Patriarkes Abraham Isaac Iacob and other godly Fathers were like vnto the first fruites to conuay the holinesse of the couenant made with them to the remainder of the Iewes which came of them And also in this respect they are resembled by a roote which imparteth all the sap it hath to branches so the godly Patriarks impart the grace of Gods couenant vnto their of spring where upon it is not to be doubted but the Iewes which ly now as men dead abiect and without hope to see too yet shall bee receiued to bee Gods people and reuiued albeit they are as it may seeme desperate as men laid in the graue and buried Tim. Now that we haue seene to what purpose Paul vsed these two metaphors and similitudes passe forwardes to the dectrines and tell vs what they be Silas First wee learne that whensoeuer wee reape the fruites of the earth wee ought to shewe thankfulnesse to God by giuing the first to him that is to our teachers to the poore in his name for the equity of this law is perpetuall although the ceremony be ceased Secondly from hence we learn that the couenāt-graces of the parents belong to such children as are borne of them Tim. But how may this bee since the Patrierkes were holy but many of the Iewes were rebellious and experience teacheth that of the best Parents come the woorse childeren In one people some be called onely some be elect and beleeuers also Silas It is true that the personall and inherent holines of the Parents to wit the godly habit of their mindes as faith hope doe not passe from the parents into the children as if vertuous and beleeuing parents should alwayes bring forth such children for these qualities come not by generation but by regeneration 〈◊〉 many outward priuiledges and qualities do descend from Fathers to childrē as free-men be get free-men Iewes beget Iewes Christians Christians by the blessing of the couenant which is made both to parents and their Children Tim. But if we bee all conceiued in sin howe doeth the holy roote make the branches holy Sil. The Iewes are spoken of as they come from Abraham and not as they come from God howsoeuer naturall corruption be contradictory to the grace of regeneration which doth qualifie and take it away yet it may well agree and stand with the grace of the couenant For as one may be borne leprous and yet be a free man when the Parents be such so one may bee borne a sinner by Adam and yet bee borne a Christian and a member of the visible Church too because hee and his parents bee within the couenant of grace which couenant though it bring with it forgiuenesse of that sinne which we draw from our first father Adam yet when it shall haue force wee are ignorant And Scripture doth not teach vs whether original sinne is forgiuen to the Infant in the wombe or at birth or presently after or at baptisme or afterward for it is not giuen to all men at one time as they teach which tye grace and forgiuenesse vnto the Sacraments But for that Infants belong to the couenant of mercy and forgiuenesse wee doe verily beleeue that they are holy and shall be pardoned so many as are elected howsoeuer they come sinners from Adam Tim. If onely such branches be holy as come from an holy roote what is this vnto vs Gentiles which are no branches of this roote Silas The Gentiles be branches grafted in though not naturall therefore the blessing and vertue of the couenant reacheth vnto vs though not by hereditary right yet by free insition and planting in which made the Apostle say of the Corinthians that their children were holy
of speech one selfe-same word vsed in seuerall sences First in il part for condemning others vncharitably then in good part for examining our selues and pondering our owne actions so to order them as no offence come thereby wee may not iudge others but we may ought to iudge our selues these be not contrary 1 Cor. 11 31. Tim. What is our Docrine from these words thus expounded Silas That after our conscience is by good reason conuicted of any sinne we must striue to leaue it and vse it no more so Paul speakes heere Let vs no more though ye haue beene bold to iudge and condemne one another for these indifferent matters yet now that ye haue heard so good and manifest reasons against it from the dignity of your Lord and his office of Iudgeship hencefoorth do it not The reasons heereof are first when wee liue in sinne after knowledge it is the greater sinne Iohn 9 41. Iames 4 17. Secondly it draweth greater wrath and punishment both temporall and eternall Prou. 1 29. Luke 12 47. He that knowes his Maisters will and doth it not shal be beaten with many stripes God bare with the Israelites in their ignorance but when they had sinned stubbornly after sundry warnings by his straunge workes hee sent strange plagues amongst them 1 Cor. 10 5 6 7. The examples of Gods iudgements against the Old world Sodomites 〈◊〉 the sonnes of Ely against Corazin and Bethsaida all of them warned by Noah or 〈◊〉 by Moses by Ely and by Christ doe confirme this truth that it is daungerous to continue in sinne after warning Thirdly sinnes against knowledge are the high-way to the sinne against the holy-Ghost for though euerie sinne after knowledge bee not that vnpardonable sinne which hath knowledge ioyned with malicious hatred of the knowne trueth of saluation by Christ yet it is a step and degree thereunto Tim. What is the vse of this instruction Silas To exhort euery one to beware chiefely of such sinnes whereof he hath beene admonished and clearely conuicted For if our loue to our bodies bee such that wee carefully auoide such things as we know are wont to hurt them how much more ought we to shew foorth this care for our soules For if ciuill Iustices Maisters Parents will more seuerely strike where their warnings be despised let not vs thinke that God will forget such as neglect his admonitions but will wound them deeply first or last that goe on in knowne sinnes as himselfe threatneth Leuit 26 21 24. I will walke stubbornly against them that walke stubbornly against me Oh that this in time might bee considered of such as haue beene often and many wayes aduertised of their faults yet are so farre giuen ouer as they vse no endeauour for the forsaking of them do not enter into any care or course of amendment Tim. What is heere meant by a stumbling blocke and occasion of falling Silas They be speeches borrowed from earthly things and translated to spirituall as from high-wayes wherein stones and blockes do lye to make men stumble and fall or from snares and nettes of Powlers and hunters they signifie euery thing that hindereth in the course of godlines either quite turning vs away from religion which is meant heere by falling or causing vs to goe on lesse chearefully which is called heere stumbling blocke and when the Apostle saith put not the meaning is that we giue no manner of offence neyther small nor great to our Brother either to make him flye whollye from Christ or to trouble him neuer so little For this place speakes not of a passine offence which is taken where none is giuen as the Pharisies and Scribes which were offended with the doctrine and myracles of Christ Mat. 15 12. and as worldlinges now are grieued with Magistrates Ministers and others for doing their duties for their zeale against vices which beeing good things ought not to scandalize any and do offend none but ill mindes But of an actiue scandal which is an offence giuen when some euill is not secretly either spoken or done but openly contrary to Gods Lawe or when our liberty in things indifferent is vnseasonably vsed by the which others are made the worse lesse godly and honest For as a stone or block so an offence must appeare An horrible crime whilst it is vnknowne it is an offence to God hurts the committer but no offence to others to hurt them till it be manifested Tim. What is our Doctrine from this place Silas That all Christians must carefully looke to this that they neuer be a iust occasion of sinning to any man either by words or deedes to hurt the saluation of any or by building them vp vnto sinne by our euill examples in our sayings or dooings For first this is against the commandement of God 1 Cor. 8 9 10. and 10 32. Secondly it puls downe heauy iudgements on our selues Math. 18 8. Better a Milstone were hanged about our necke c. The world is full of examples of such as haue beene grieuously plagued of God for being authors and occasions of sinne to others as Gen. 3. the History of Adam and Eues fall the Serpent punished more then Eue and Eue more then Adam Iezabel more plagued then the Iudges and false witnesses which accused and killed Naboth Ieroboam for making the Israelites to sin more punished then the Israelites themselues Thirdly it is against the example of the blessed Apostle 1. Cor. 8 13. Fourthly by offence giuen wee breake the rule of charity which shunneth the greeuances hurt of euery man and studieth how to foster help and strengthen euen the weakest As in a naturall body the stronger mēber succoureth the feebler or as a Phisition or Chirurgion tenderly handleth a diseased or pained party so loue is maruailous chary not to trouble or doe the least harme to the soule of any Christian brother Rom. 14 15. Fiftly by offence giuing wee sinne against our neighbour while wee beate nay wound his weake conscience which is great cruelty procuring him by our example to allow or doe some thing whereof in his conscience hee was not resolued or which he knew he ought not to do had not we made him to stumble 1. Cor. 8 12. Nay by our offence we destroy our brother so much as lyeth in vs and become very butchers murtherers of our brothers soule eyther wholy driuing him away from the faith or discouraging him and what a matter is this for so slender a thing as meates and drinkes daies or such like indifferent things to bee the death and slaughter not of the body but of the precious soules of men Rom. 14 15. Lastly this reacheth not to our brother alone and to his destruction but euen so high as Christ the head and Lord against whome wee sinne in wounding or hurting any member or seruant of his 1. Cor. 8 12. There is that straight coniunction betweene Christ and the faithfull that the
good or the euill offered to them redounds to him Mat. 25 45. Also how can wee by our offence giuen make voide the fruite and force of Christs death towards our brother offended by v so much as we may and no thankes to vs if it bee not so what other thing I say can this be then to sinne against Christ by plucking from him one whom he hath so dearely bought Which ought not to bee vnderstood as if any effectually redeemed by the death of Christ and by faith ingrafted in him could indeed perish as Huberus many Lutherans teach for this is most firmely to be held as Augustine saith That none of the predestinate can vtterly fall away from grace for then Gods election should be frustrate and Christ vntrue who saith It is vnpossible Mat. 24. And his loue changeable Iohn 13 1. His couenant broken Iere. 31 32. Christs intercession vnauaileable Iohn 17 15 20 21. Gods wisedome decelued his power and goodnesse ouercome and vanquished by mans sinne all which are not onely absurd but impossible howbeit in respect of mans weakenesse ready to fall euen as a young childe or a sicke person soone ouerturned and the extreame power and malice of Sathan that like a Dragon is able to shake and pull downe Cedars euen strong ones if God permit And lastly in regard of the great dangerous temptations and scandals which sore tempt vs it is true that the beleeuer may be destroyed and when any offence is giuen them then what lyeth in the party that put the blocke in his brothers way hee casteth his brother downe headlong to eternall destruction but the mighty God with his hand vpholds all his not from falling but from falling away Tim. What duties may this doctrine of offences teach vs Silas It instructeth vs to know that such things as in respect of their nature bee not euill and which otherwise we might doe yet if they proue scandals and hurts to our brethren we ought to shun them as things sinfull and vnlawfull for that meate which may be eaten if no offence follow to eate it with offence is euill to him that doth it Rom. 14 20. and the like we are to iudge of all other indifferent things that accidentally by the scandall annexed to them they cease to be indifferent and pollute him that doth them with offence Secondly here is an admonition to all Christians which openly commit grosse sinnes and by their example teach others to doe the like Also to parents Maisters and all Gouernors which in the presence of their inferiors haue spoken or done wicked things or foreslowed good duties as prayer reading c. edifying them in iniquity by such naughty practises and by sins of omission that betimes vpon the former reasons they moue themselues to hearty repentance for the scandall and offences they haue set before others For seeing Christ hath said it Woe must bee to such by whom offences come except such as giue thē be truly humbled turning to God desiring forgiuenesse of his mercy fully purposing to walke without offence heereafter for certainely they shall feele the curse of God which doe giue occasion of harme to the soules of heedelesse men seeing a cursse is threatned Deut. 27 18. Will God poure his curse and vengeance on them who make the blinde stumble to the hurt of his body wil he not much more do this to soul destroyers Tim. Now that we haue done with the doctrine of offences and proued it by reasons both forreigne and bred in the Text let vs heare what we are to learne from the obiection in the 14. verse and first what it is to be perswaded through the Lorde Iesus Silas Through the Lord Iesus signifies not the merit of his death as some thinke for before the time of his passion nothing was vncleane in his owne nature but either 1. generally through Adams sinne which polluted all or 2. morally by intemperancie and ryot or 3. Ceremonially prohibited as certaine Beasts vnder the Law or 4. scrupulously and superstitiously of such as doubt of the lawfulnesse of lawfull meates It signifies therefore by the teaching and instruction of Christ by whose spirit he knew and was perswaded not probably and couiecturally as the word is vsed when the Scripture speaks of other mens faith and constancy as Rom. 15 14. 2 Tim. 1 5. Heb. 6 9. but certainly infallibly and assuredly so as he knowes it could not be otherwise In which sence the word is vsed when a man speakes of his owne Religion and saluation as Rom. 8 20. For euery man knowes best his owne heart and those things that himselfe hath receiued of God 2 Cor. 2 12. Tim. What is our Doctrine hence Silas That Christian faith is not a bare opinion or a doubting thinking a thing to bee so but an vndeceiuable certainty of that wee doe beleeue containing in it these three distinct things First a sound distinct knowledge of the thing beleeued I know Secondly a firme perswasion strongly assuring the heart Thirdly a confidence resting and reioycing with satisfaction vnto our mindes surely looking to enioy that we beleeue Tim. What Vse is to be made of this doctrine Silas That ignorant Christians who do either hate knowledge or seeke not for it also the wauering minded which do not rest with any gladnesse in the promises of Christ they are quite destitute of Faith what socuer they thinke of themselues And they doe falsly teach the doctrine of faith who deny to it infallible certainty And lastly it is a good token both of the being and growing of faith in a Christian heart the more firmely and strongly it doth apprehend and sticke to the word Moreouer from the 14. verse we are taught that the Papists defile pollute Gods creatures to themselues because they iudge them to be vncleane for meates bee as they are esteemed vncleane to him that thinks them so Of the purity and impurity of meates we shall say more in verse 20. Tim. Then in the meane time expound and collect the instructions from verse 16. the last verse of our text Silas It hath a new argument to disswade from giuing offence to the weak in our christian liberty about meats thus We may not do ought which may cause our Christian liberty to be euill spoken of but for the strong to eate with offence to the weake it wil cause our commodity to be euill spoken off therefore offences ought to be auoided For exposition of the words howsoeuer by your good or commodity some vnderstand their faith or hope of glory or godlinesse yet the matter in hande which is to direct to the right vse of christian libertie in middle things and the comparing this Text with 1 Cor. 10 29. wher that is stiled Liberty which here is phrased Good doth clearely open this place to be meant of this liberty which might be blasphemed that is reproched and euill spoken of and Christ also by it
inumerable for the accomplishment of this our conference to the illustration and clearing of this darke Epistle in some measure for the instructiof the Church be all praise and glory Amen FINIS AN INDEX OR TABLE of the chiefe words and matters opened and treated of in this Epistle ABba Chap. 8. Dial. 14. Abraham a pattern of all iustified persons Ch. 4. verse 1 and v. 22 27. Abraham how the father of the faithfull and heire of the world Chap. 4. v. 13. and 17. Abrahams faith commended ch 4. v 17 18 19. Abraham when iustifyed and why circumcised chap 4. Dial. 1 2 5 6. 7. Abrahams true Children and counterfet ch 9. Di. 2. Abraham how the root of the Iewes ch 10. di 13 15 Abrogation of Moses Law how farre and wherein not ch 6. di 8. and ch 7. dial 2 4. No Abolition of the creatures at the last day but an alteration onely chap. 8. Dial 19 20 21. Abstinence from certaine meates at certain times no matter of Religion or saluation against Iewish and popish abstinence Chap. 14. ver 17. Absolution from sinne first part of Iustification Chap. 5 verse 1. Actions their end and euent Ch 14. v 6. Adams fall Chap. 5. verse 12 6. Adam propagated sin and death into his posterity ch 5. v. 12 13 14 c. Adam compared with Christ to whom hee is like vnlike in sundry respects How and wherein the second Adam excels the first ch 5. v. 15 16 17 18. Adiaphora that there bee such and howe to discerne them and deale in them ch 14 throughout Adoption what it signifies also how manisold what it is ch 8. v. 15 23. Adoption to bee certainly known and how ch 8. v. 16. Adoration by Latria doulia a vaine distinction Ch 1. v. 9. Adulti haue faith by hearing ch 10. v. 14. Aduocate or intercessour how Christ is so and howe the Spirite and what things required to Christes aduocateship and what comfort in it Mary no aduocate Ch. 8. v. 26. and 34. Adultery Chap. 1. v. 29. Affictions their causes kinds ends vses and remedies how they worke patience ch 5. v. 3. 4. Ch 12. v. 12 AEdification what Ch. 14. v. 19. 20. ch 15 v. 2. All not euer put vniuersally but indefinitely and for to take away distinction of nations ch 10. v 11. c 11 32. Almes or benificence vnto the poore how woor thie a duty and what prouocations to it and hinderances ch 12 13. ch 15 25 26. Allegation of Scriptures how vsed by the apostles ch 1. 17. 4. v 3. ch 11. v 13 14 Altars Priests Sacrifices vnder the Gospel and how ch 12. v 1. ch 15. v 16. Ambition what ch 12. v 16. Analogy of faith what Ch. 12. v. 11 12. Anathema what and whither Paul praied to be made so Ch. 9. v. 3. Angels good bad what their power is ch 8 v. 38. Anguish what ch 8. v. 35. Antiquity of the Gospell and of the Doctrine of free iustification by Fairh Ch. 1. v. 2. and 17. Antiquity of Fathers and doctors of the church what we are to yeild vnto it Ch. 9. and 10. in 〈◊〉 dial Antichrist Cha 3. v. 5. cha 12. v 10. Apostle what it meaneth how many of their calling authority dignity diligence and efficacy of the Ministery and extent of their commission and other markes whereby to know one ch 1 v. 1. Ch 15. v. 14 15. Iesuites no Apostles Harmony betweene Apostles Prophets Ch. 15. v 20 21. Application of Doctrine how it is a part of faith ch 1 Appeare all must before Christ when and how Ch. 14. v. 12. Arrogancie and pride how differ Ch. 12. v. 16. Astrologie coniecturall or Astronomicall science why and wherein to be blamed Ch. 9. v 9 10. Assurance a necessarie effect of faith Ch. 4. v. 21. Augustine no English Apostle or conuerted vnto the faith Ch. 10 v 18. Authority the kindes and degrees of it causes vse of it How to bee submitted to and why ch 13. v 1 2 3 4 Awakening corporal spirituall why needfull ch 13. v. 11 12. B. Backbowed what it meaneth ch 11. v. 10. Backbiting what ch 1 30. Baptism is not regeneratiō but a seale of it whence it hath his force it is not absolutely necessary to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not ex opere operato ch 4. v 11 and Chap. 6 verse 3. Benefits of the Couenant Ch. 〈◊〉 v 29. Blaspheming what Ch. 1. v 24. Ch 14. v. 16. Blesse what it importes ch 12. v. 14. Blessednesse what it is wherein it consisteth the causes and effects of it ch 4 v 6 7 8. Bloud of Christ comprehends his whole sufferinges and obedience why ioyned with faith Ch. 3. v 25. Blindnes of the Iewes ch 11. v 10. Boasters who ch 1. v 30. Body why sinne so called ch 6 v 6 c 7. v 24. Body how the Church so likened ch 12. v. 3 4. Body the resurrection of it ch 8 11. 14. v. 9. c. 8. v. 34 Boldnes in a Minister a good thing the reasons of it ch 15 v 15. ch 9. v. 27. Bondage of the wise to the husband in what things how long and what freeth her ch 7 v. 1 2 3. Bondage to sin and the law wherein it is and how freed from it ch 7. v. 4 5 6. Bound to sin how the ingodly and godlye differ in this ch 7. v. 6. Bow the knee to Christ what it noteth Ch 14. v 11. Branches seeming true Ch 11. v 17 19. Brethren why Christians so called whether Papistes be our brethren or not cha 12. v. 1. and v. 10. C. Calling to a function Ecclesiasticall by whom what workes of it how needfull Ch. 1. v 1. Calling of English Preachers iustified to be of God ch 10. v. 15. Calling vnto Christianity generall or speciall Calling often ioyned with election and why Ch 8. ve 28 〈◊〉 Ch. 9 v. 21. Chap. 9 verse 11. ch v 9. 24. Canon of faith and manners is the written word of God Ch. 14 v. 23. and often elsewhere Cauillers at good doctrin how to be handled ch 3 8. Chambering what it is ch 13 v. 13. Charity or loue how a debt howe differs from others debts ch 13 verse 8. Howe it doth not iustifie vs and yet it is the fulfilling of the Law Chap 13. verse 8 9 10. Charity chiese of Morall vertues it iudgeth coniecturally Chap 12 verse 9. ch 8 v. 38. Chastity lost by drunkennes and gluttony c. 13. v 13 Certainty of saluation by Faith and by hope infallibly by both and why chap. 8. ver 1 24. Certainty of Gods prouidence stands wel with meanes ca 15. v. 30. Ceremonies Legal determined in Christ his death ch 14. v. 1 2 3 4. Christ true God also man and why ch 1. v 3 4. Christ his person his offices his benefits ch 1. ver 3 4. Christ deliuered to death by Iudas and by his Father ch 4. ver 25. Christ why both dead and
obedience chap 12. v. 1. God ordainer of powers and is obeyed or resisted in them and how many waies ch 13. v. 2 3. God of peace of patience and consolation why so called ch 15. v. 5. God sent his Sonne out of loue to mankinde and why ch 8. v 32. God the onely auenger and why ch 12. v 19. God with him no vnrighteousnesse or cruelty either in execution of decrees or in the decrees themselues Ch 9. v 14 19 20. chap 11 v 35 36. God no respecter of persons ch 2. v 11. Howe persons may bee respected Gods will supreame cause of all his counsel and works ch 9. v 11 15. Gods will not to bee registred how it is to be vnderstood ch 2. v 19. Gods glory in manifestation of his mercy iustice the vtmost 〈◊〉 of all his counsels ch 9. v 22 23. Gods wrath and Iustice how fearfull a thing ch 3 5. and ch 5. v 6. and 8. Gospell of God why so called ch 1. v 2. and 15. verse 16. Gospell what it signifyes preached by the Prophets the authority excellencie antiquity and efficacy of it ch 1. v. 2. Gospell wherein it differs from the Law ch 1. verse 17. Gospel not to be ashamed of ch 1. v 16. Gospell how the power of God ch 1. v 16. Gospell how called a form or mould ch 5 v 17. Gospell what a blessing to enioy it ch 3. v 2. Gospell good holie iust ch 7. v 12. Gospel to be delighted in ch 7. v 22. Gospel how to bee esteemed and receiued Chap 1. v 2 3. Gospel preached both is obiect and instrument of Faith Gospel how the Iewes enemies to it Ch 11. v 28. Gospel why at first confirmed with myracles Chap 15 v. 19. Gospel a sacrificing sword ch 15. v 16. Gospel bow cause of death being a word of life Gospel word of faith and why Ch 10 v. 8. Gospel brings Spirit of Adoption Ch 8. v 14. Good why the Law so entitled Ch 7 v. 12. Good earnestly to bee sollowed Ch 12. v. 9. Good purposed when it cannot be effected Ch 15 verse 22. Good which we would we cannot alwayes do Chap 7. verse 15 16. Good is wrought out of al things toward the elect ch 8 v 28. Good doers may looke for praise and neede feare no punishment Chap 13. verse 3 4. Good by the wise GOD drawne out of euil Ch 8 v. 28. Ch 11 v 11. Good by sinne conuerted to euill Ch 11. v 9. 7. Grace what it signifies how manifold the spring of all good giftes Chap 1 ver 7. Grace howe holinesse so called Chap 6. v 23. Grace how Apostleship so tearmed Ch 1 verse 5. Ch 15 15. Grace extolled by Faith suppressed by the Law Ch 4 16. Grace in cause of Iustification contrary to works Ch 11 verse 6. Grace more abounds wher sinne abounds how to bee vnderstood ch 5. v 20. What it is to bee vnder Grace ch 6. v. 15. Grace of Christ how preuailes aboue Adams sin ch 5. v 16 17 c. That Grace may abounde we may not sin Ch 6. v. 1. Grace of God how necessary for all beleeuers Cha 16 v. 20 and 24. Griefe what it is cha 10 verse 2. We must grieue mourn with such as mourne how Ch. 12. v. 15. Griefe in Paule great for the abiection of the Iewes Chap 9. verse 23. and Ch. 10 1 2. H. Heart what it signifies ch 10 v. 9 10. From the heart what it is ch 6 17. From the heart prayers must come if they be accepted ch 10 15. Heart-hardnesse what it is how manifo'd how procured how to be cured how dangerous fearfull when it is whollye and for euer Markes to know it by the causes of it ch 2. v. 5. Chap 11 v. 7. Hast an effect of vnbelief and cause of shame ch 9. v last Head of the Church not Peter or Pope but Christ. Ch. 12. v. 4. Hearing how Faith by it Ch. 10 14. Heauens howe vnder vanity how to bee glorified New heauens what Ch. 8. v 21 22. Heathen their calling to Christ prophefied of ch 15. v. 9 10. 11. Heathens how a wild Oliue ch 11. v. 17. Of their grafting in and how partakers of the fatnesse of the Oliue Heathens how beholden to Gods bountifulnes chap. 11 v. 18 19 20 21. Holy how Scriptures bee so why the law is so entitled ch 1. v 1 2. Christians sacrifice how holy ch 12. v. 1. Holinesse way to heauen ch 6 v. 23. Holy how the branches so because root is so ch 11 16. How our children beso ib. Hope what it is how manifold how Christian hope differs from 〈◊〉 see ch 5. v. 5 6. and c. 8. v. 24 25. Hope how it makes not ashamed Hope how saued by it Hope the office of it Hope how the fruite of experience and ioyned euer with patience ch 8. v. 24. Hope is of good things to come only of eternal glo ry chiefly See ch 8 24. Hope a temedy of afflictions ch 12 v 12. I. Iesus what it meanes ch 1 1. 3. Ignorance of God how great a sinne why to bee auoided ch 2. v. 12. Ignorance how it excuses Ignorance polluteth zeale Ignorance ioyned with pride and rebellion against God ch 10 v. 2. 3. Ignorance how dangerous in a guide and teacher Ch. 2 v. 19 20. Image of God vnlawfull how Image and Idol all one ch 1. v. 23. 25. Iustice imputed inherent Iustification how differs from sanctification Causes and effects of it Ch. 〈◊〉 v. 14. Iustified how wee are by Christs resurrection ch 4. verse last Iustification the partes of it how it is the grounde of peace ch 5. v. 1. K. King how Christ is so ch 1. v. 3. Kingdome of Christ spirituall Kingdome of God what be the conditions and parts of it ch 14. v. 17. Kissing the Booke in an Oath ch 9. v. 1. Kisses how vsed in the primitiue Church ch 16 v. 16. Knowledge of the worde how excellent and necessary ch 13. v. 12. Knowledge part of faith ch 14. v. 14. Knowledge of sinne speculatiue and experimental both by the Law ch 7. v. 7. Knowledge of the Lawe what it worketh ch 3. v. 20. and 4. v. 15. L. Law how many significations ch 3. 19. Law how manifold of nature of Moses Ceremonial iudiciall morall how abrogate Chap. 2. v. 14. and Ch 10 4. Law how spirituall and what to be learned by it ch 7 v. 14. Law how called iust ch 7 v 12. Law impossible to be kept and why ch 8. v. 3. Law how ordained to life and occasion of sinne and death Chap. 7. verse 10 11. Law of members and of minde what they be ch 7. v. 23. Lawe how to be delighted in and why ch 7. v. 22. Law cannot iustify vs and why ch 8. v. 3. Law the righteousnesse of it neither easie possible cer taine or comfortable chap. 10. v. 4 5 c. Law how the inheritance is not by it ch
the elect Tim. What doctrine ariseth from these word thus opened Silas That nothing that is in men their thoughts words deeds do not auail any thing to election or saluation in such sort as to be causes to moue God to chuse and saue some and not others this comes not by willing and running out of our merits Tim. Must wee vnderstand this dectrine of vnregenerate onely or of the faithfull also Silas Of all sorts of men both one and the other it is not the desires and deedes of any whereupon their saluation and election depends as vpon 〈◊〉 motiues or efficient causes Tim. What is it then that you iudge of the will and deedes of naturall men Silas Euery man before his new birth hath in him the power of willing euen from his birth the force and power of his will is to will freely euery thing that is euill freely to will some good things for the will cannot bee compelled it willeth freely whatsoeuer it willeth The good things which it willeth are either naturall and ciuill good things that belōg to this life as to eat rest take phisick c. or to resraine the outward 〈◊〉 of vices and to doe the outward actions of vertues yea and in diuine thinges a man hath power naturally to will that which is outwardly to bee done yet so as with this power of willing there commeth the effectuall power of God moouing all things and prolpering that which men do well Tim. Why doth the Apostle say it is not in man that willeth or runneth if it be so Sil. He doth not absolutely deny that men do wil or run or forbid vs simply either to desire or endeuour or doe any thing but he teacheth that God eternally did see nothing that was to bee naturally in man to moue him to elect him to life or that ought which a man doeth or willeth before his new birth is acceptable to God and auailable to saue himselfe Tim. But are we not to iudge otherwise of the workes and wils of 〈◊〉 persons Silas No otherwise as in this regard 〈◊〉 they should haue any stroke in their election to moue God thereunto indeede they please God through Christ because they are the fruites of his Spirite though vnperfect as also they be the way wherein the godly walke towardes heauen But as they cannot merit our saluation by the doing of them so the foresight of them did not moue God to elect vs or yet to call or iustifie or adopt and sanctifie vs and saue vs. Tim. But are not Gods children bound to will and to do good duties to beleeue and to repent Silas True they are and without them none of yeares can be saued but not to ascribe their election vnto them because many Infants are chosen who neuer coulde doe good Tim. Shew vs the reason of this doctrine Silas First all the goodnesse which is in the woorke and will of man proceedes from Gods purpose and election and therefore can be no cause of it 1. Tim. 1. Ephe. 1. 4. Secondly there is that contrariety in the matter of election and saluation betweene mercy and workes grace and merite that if in any sort it doeth depend vpon workes it doeth in no sort come from grace and mercy as the opposition in this text shewes and the plaine words of chap. 11. verse 6. Tim. What is the vse hereof Silas It confutes such as set vp free will and make the beginnings of their saluation to come from themselues which as it directly crosseth the Scriptures which teach that in our will or vnderstanding there is no goodnesse till GOD put it in so it derogateth much from the glory of Gods mercy also too much exalteth and puffeth vp flesh and bloud Secondly though this may not quench and kill our care and endeuour of well doing yet it must serue to humble vs euen for our best desires and endeuours for as much as they doe wholly spring from Gods mercy and are of no value in the cause of election and saluation Tim. What doctrine are wee to learne from the second part of this text Silas That Gods mercy is the whole and all-sufficient cause of mans election as also of all our willing and running well yea and of our heauenly inheritance Tim. If all must be committed to Gods mercy what then are we stocks and stones doe we nothing Sil. Yea 〈◊〉 the godly doc both will and worke but they are impelled thereunto by his Spirite which they receiue from his grace Gal. 4. 5. Rom. 8. 15. Phil. 1 Iohn 15 without mee ye can doe nothing God preuenteth the vnwilling to make him willing saith Augustine and followeth him being made willing least he do will in vaine Tim. Then it seemes that our working and Gods shewing mercy doe together get vs to bee saued as God calleth by the voyce of the Minister and by Parents brings children into the world and Magistrates rule through the helpe and blessing of God and he giues life by foode and light by the sunne so men are saued by his mercies and their owne endeuours Silas Indeede some haue so taken these wordes of willing and running as if they alone by themselues were not sufficient without Gods mercy and so they part the matter of our saluation betweene God and man mercy and workes so as that wee doe were nothing in comparison of that which Gods mercy performeth yet were of some force but it may as well be saide that mercy is not sufficient without our willing and running Secondly mercy is here so set by the Apostle against our will and courses as that the setting vp one of these is the putting downe of the other 3. It is the mercy of God that doth enable men to will and to doe well giuing them faith and repentance and perseuerance in these graces so as mercy is all in all it begins and finisheth our saluation What I am I am by the grace of God Tim. Why would God haue all that belongs to our saluation referred to his mercy Silas First that all might be free as from grace of God not merit of men and he might haue glory of all Secondly that such as would reioyce might reioyce not in themselues but reioyce onely herein that they know God to be mercifull praysing him for putting into them good willes and power to doe good workes and finally for crowning his owne gifts and all of his mercy Phil. 2 13. Tim. What is the vse heereof Silas It admonisheth all Gods children to thinke of themselues and all that they can doe most basely most highly of the rich mercies of God in Christ louing them praysing them and studying to imitate them also to depend vpon his mercy for the beginning proceeding and end of their saluation and to abhorre all conceit of iniustice in God in respect of his eternall election sithence all being lost in Adam hee might according to iustice haue left
all to themselues to be hardened in their sinnes it being his most merciful nature and nothing else which moued him to exempt some from that common misery that being freede from sinne and death by Christ they might partake in his heauenly glory to the glory of his grace DIAL X. Verse 17. For the Scripture saith to Pharaoh for this purpose haue I stirred thee vp that I might shew my power in thee and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth Tim. VVHat is the Apostles drift in these words Silas Hauing cleared God before of iniustice in respect of his electing some out of lost mankinde because hee did it out of the prerogatiue of his absolute and most free mercies as Paul confirmeth by testimony of Scripture so now he like-wise proueth by Scripture that God is not vniust in the matter of reprobation out of Exodus 9 16. Tim. What argument doth Paul take out of this Scripture to proue his purpose Silas From a particular example of Pharaoh whom God did not chuse but reiect very iustly as appeareth two wayes First from the quality of Pharaoh beeing a man hardened by sinne noted in this word raised vp as Paul expounds it in the next verse for seeing Pharaoh was hardened and became obstinate before hee was destroyed therefore God could not be vniust in appointing him vnto destruction for sinners doe perish iustly therefore God is not vniust when he doth appoint them vnto destruction Secondly from the end which hee propoundeth to himselfe of his owne counsell namely the declaration of his owne power and iustice to the praise of his name Now that cannot bee vniust which is done of God to so good an end if withal it be considered that Gods glory is the cheefest good thing and that he hath an absolute right in all his creatures to dispose of them as he thinkes best for his owne glory Tim. But how fitly doth Paul gather a generall doctrine touching all reprobates from this one example Silas Very fitly because the cause and case of all reprobates is one and the same for none of them perish but in regard of their foregoing sinne and God is glorified in the destruction of euery one of them therefore if God dealt iustlye in reprobating Pharaoh vpon these grounds hee is also iust in the reprobating and refusing all other appointed to damnation Tim. What are the parts of this Text Silas Two First a preface and secondly a testimony of Scripture Tim. What is meant by Pharaoh Silas It was a name common to the Kings of Egipt signifieth an auenger as afterwards their Kings were called And the Kings of Gezar Abimelech and the Emperors of Rome Caesar. Tim. What is meant by Scripture Silas Generally euery thing that is written but more especially the holy writings of Moses and yet more particularly the booke of Exodus and therein this one sentence And further by Scripture wee may vnderstand God speaking in the Scripture as appeareth by comparing this place with verse 25. as also by reason for the Scripture is the word of God Tim. What instruction doth arise from hence Silas That euery clause and sentence of holy Scripture must be spoken of and heard and vsed with all religious reuerence firme beleefe The reason heereof is because the most glorious God is the author of it and hath inspired them 2 Tim. 3 16. 2 Pet. 1 21. Tim. What vse is to be made of this point Sil. It reprooues such as faile in excesse of reuerence to the Scriptures ascribing diuine force to the Letters and Syllables pronounced as if God had enclosed his vertue in them which is a meere inchantment and sorcery Secondly such as faile in defect and want of reuerence receiuing Gods words as the worde of a man prophanely denying authority and obedience to them Thirdly it warnes vs in the hearing of the word to remember that we haue to do with God whosoeuer bee the Instruments to deliuer this vnto vs Acts 10 33. Tim. What other doctrine will arise from this Preface Silas That the doctrine of reprobation ought by the Ministers of God to be taught vnto the Church but warily and with circumspection as the mindes of the people be not estranged from God by the rash handling of it For the doctrine of reprobation is a part of the holie Scripture and is reuealed therein therefore it belongeth to vs to take knowledge of it Deut. 29 29. Also this doctrine is profitable and necessary to be knowne for it serueth well to commend Gods mercie toward the elect and to encrease their thankefulnesse finee they know that he freely elected them to life 〈◊〉 they were no lesse corrupt and miserable then those whom he refused Also it teacheth all men to iudge and speak aright of God to wit that he hath absolute power ouer men to appoint them to what ends it pleaseth him without any vnrighteousnesse at all Ti. Is there any other things to be collected out of this Preface Silas Yea two things First that not only the whole Bible but euery particular sentence therein is to be accounted the word of God Lastly it confutes such papists as say that the Scriptures be mute and dumbe for God speaketh in them it is a speaking Iudge Let Christ iudge saith Augustine and the Apostles with him for in them Christ speakes Tim. What are we to learne out of the testimony being the second part of the Text Sil. Three things First that God is the author of reprobation Secondly by what degrees and meanes that counsell is fulfilled Thirdly the vtmost end of this decree of God Tim. How is the first gathered from this Text Sil. Because it is saide I that is I God haue stirred thee vp also that God hated Esau verse 13. and that God prepareth vessels to wrath verse 22. Adde heereunto 1. Thess. 5 10. Tim. What profit of this Sil. First it confutes such as will not haue reprobation depend vpon the will of God but vppon the workes and will of men Secondly such as affirme that there is no decree of reprobation at all Sil. But if God for his wil sake reprobate men is he not herein vniust Silas No because betweene the decree of his reprobation and the execution of it there alwaies goes the sinne of the party as the meritorious cause of theyr destruction Also God refuseth for most holy ends and lastly his will is the rule of righteousnesse Tim. What is meant by the stirring vp of Pharaob Silas It containes those degrees and meanes by the which Gods counsell was performed vpon Pharaoh The degrees be these First that he was created of God iust in Adam but in him suffered to fall Secondly that God had aduanced him to the kingdome Thirdly that amids the great plagues of Egypt he preserued him aliue when others were destroyed Exod. 9 15. Fourthly that GOD withdrew grace from him that hee could not profit by those wonderful