offertur nomini meo oblatio munda quia magnum est nomen meum in gentibus dicit Dominus exercituum I haue no pleasure in yowe saieth the Lorde of hostes And as for meat offring I will not accept yt as your handes For from the rising vppe of the sunne vnto the going downe of the same my name ys great emong the gentiles yea in euery place shall ther be sacrifice doen and a clean meat offring offred vppe vnto my name For my name ys great emong the Gentiles saeth the Lorde of hostes This prophecie hath moche tormented the Aduersaries and therfore all Protestantes tormented with the propheâ—… 〈◊〉 howe â—…ey wrest yt their ingines hookes and all their fetches haue be sett vpon this place to drawe yt to their sense and pourpose but yt will not be all will not serue that they can doo for trueth will shewe yt self and preuaill This prophecie in dede inuinciblie proueth the Sacrifice of Chrystes Churche as hereafter shall be shewed But first let vs see howe the Aduersaries wolde wrest this place and let vs make yt plain to the reader that the sence whiche they wolde haue the scripture vnderstanded in ys not the right and full sence but a distorted sence a wrong sense and soche a sense as the place can not beare a sense disagreing from the expositions of all the holie Fathers bothe of the latin churche and of the greke churche Occolampadius in a booke that he did write of the Masse vnto the Senate of Basille saieth that by this prophecie of the Prophet Malachie was Prophecied Occolamp that the ministres of the newe testament shoulde make a faithfull people oute of all nacions as a pure and an holie oblacion and sacrifice to God And this saieth he ys the minde of the Prophet Martin Bucer not moche differing from him in his aunswer that he made to Latomus saieh that hy this Prophecie ys cheiflie promised the preaching of the Gospell by the whiche God shall be euery whear acknowleged and Bucer the fruicte also of the same preaching that ys faithe and the confessing of the same faithe And he saieth also that by the incense and oblacion are to be vnderstanded the sacrifices of chrysten men whiche be saieth he the praising and calling on the name of God wherunto ys allwaies annexed the geuing vppe of our selues to the will of God and the declaracion of our thaÌ„kefull minde towardes God by the doing and shewing of loue and mercie to the poore And thus dothe he expownde the Prophete Bullinger an other of the same secte and sorte saieth that the lawde and prayse of God his name ys the pure sacrifice that the Prophete speaketh of Bullinger Vrbanus Rhegius But Vrbanus Rhegius writing against Eckius his master in his firstbooke saieth thus The sacrifice that Malachias prophecied of ys the mortificacion of the flesh and the calling on the name of God with godlie prayer And this was his phantasie whiche so I terme as I might the rest for that eche of theÌ„ hath vnderstanded the prophecie as him listeth and not as the full mening of the same hathe required And although other haue vttered their conceptes and coniecturs vpon this prophecie Yet these being the standarde bearers of that wicked armie that hath so maliciouslie fowght against Gods truthe maie fuffice to be rehersed for this time presupposing that the rest do folowe their standerd bearers But let vs nowe examin and weigh their expositions Yf ye marke they do all agree in this that this prophecie ys to be vnderstanded of the sacrifice of praise and thanks geuing which thei call the pure sacrifice Yt ys to be considered here that Allmightie God by his Prophet declaring that the sacrifice of the Iewes which was onelie doen in Hierusalem shoulde be reiected abolished and lefte signified also that an other sacrifice shoulde be substituted in the place of the same whiche shoulde be a pure and clean sacrifice whiche shoulde not be doen onlie in Hierusalem as the other was But in euery place Nowe as for the sacrifice of a contrite heart of lawde praise and thankes geuing who doubteh but that they were vsed and offred of diuerse holie Psal 50. and vertuouse men in the olde lawe and well accepted whiche thing Dauid was not ignorant of when he saied Sacrificium Deo spiritus contribulatus Psalm 49. cor contritum humiliatum Deus non despicies A troobled spirit ys a sacrifice to God a contrite and humble heart o God shalt thowe not despice Of the sacrifice of lawde Dauid also speaketh Immola Deo sacrificium laudis Offer to God the sacrifie of lawde c. praise And in the same Psalm Sacrificium laudis honorificabit me Who so offreth me thankes and praise he honoureth me The hereticall expositions of the prophecie of Malachie cannot stand Therfore wher the Aduersarie wolde that these kinde of Sacrifices shoulde be they of the whiche the prophet Malachie spake that shoulde come into the place of the sacrifice of the Iewes whiche God wolde abolisshe their exposition can not stande For these can not nowe be placed as newe sacrifices whiche were placed and vsed from the beginning of the first good man that offred sacrifice to God Abel who withe the sacrifice of the fruictes of the earth whiche he offred offred also praise and thankes geuing to God These sacrifices then be not newe placed but being of olde time vsed God wolde haue them so continued Neither doo I meen that these be separated from that sacrifice that God wolde place in stead of the sacrifice of the Iewes For their ys no extern sacrifice Sacrifice of laude separated from the extern sacrifice but yf yt be rightlie and duely offred yt bringeth with yt the sacrifice of lawde and praise and of other also But that the Prophet dothe meen of these onelie and not raither of some extern sacrifice to be vsed offred and frequented among the Chrystians and that he ment not cheiflie and principallie of an extern sacrifice to be placed in the place of the Iewes extern sacrifices that ys most vntrue And that maie be perceaued by the difference of the newe sacrifice from the olde What ys that That yt shall be a pure sacrifice Why were not theirs pure sacrifices before in the olde lawe Was ther not a sacrifice of expiacion and a daie of expiacion assigned in the whiche the clensing sacrifice shoulde be offred Read the xvi chapter of Leuiticus and ther shall ye finde that Allmightie God saeth thus In hac die expiatio vestri erit Leuit. 16. atque mundatio ab omnibus peccatis vestris coram Domino mundabimini In this daie shall be your expiacion and cleÌ„sing and ye shall be made clean from all your sinnes before the Lorde Was not this then a pure sacrifice that purified and clensed the people from all their sinnes before God Ys yt not a pure sacrifice that ys
entreth not into their stomackes I meen into their solues ther to fede them and make them lustie and fatte that yt maie appeare in their faces in their outwarde conuersacion and godlie liuing Theise be the verie wasters in dede not wourthie to haue accesse to treasure houses storehouses and places of plentie Some other likewise lacking grace and discrecion abuse thinges of plentie As the father leauing to the Sonne great treasure for the mainteināce of his liuing and the mercifull releiuing of soche as haue nede the sonne abuseth and absumeth the same in mainteining of quarrells Suites contencions and molestations of his bretheren and other for whiche cause better yt had ben that soche treasure had ben deliuered vnto him as he had neded yt to helpe his necessitie than he hauing the libertie of the wholl wickedlie shoulde abuse yt Euen so men withoute grace and discrecion hauinge libertie to come to the treasure of the scripturs wher yt was geuen them to good vse as to maintein the godlie life that they shoulde lead in Christ and by counsell to relieue thē that haue nede of yt they abuse yt to Scisme and Heresie wherby cometh contencion Sectes and diuision to the great molestacion of their christen bretheren Wherfore were yt not better that this treasure were deliuered vnto them by soche as God hath appointed and so to vse yt well then hauing libertie of the wholl to abuse all Howsoeuer then this Proclamer to winne the people by flatterie wolde haue the scriptures common to all sortes yet as to the auncient Fathers yt hath appeared the best waie that yt shoulde be deliuered So shall our miserable experience teach vs at the last that yt ys the best waie Valdo a man alltogether vnlearned hauing a desire to cōme into this storehouse of God caused certain bookes of the scripture to be translated Valdo whiche he reading withoute vnderstanding fell into diuerse heresies and became an Authour of heresie hauing many foloweing as his Secte which Valdenses siue Pauperes de Lugduno were called after his name Valdenses and by an other name Pauperes de Lugduno the poor men or people of Lions Oute of the same fountain of ignorance saieth Alfonsus sprang an other sorte of Heretikes called Begradi Turelupini men plainlie ignorante and clere Begardi Turelupini withoute all learning All whiche mens errours proceaded of a peruerse sense and wrong vnderstanding of the scriptures whiche they through ignorance mixed with malice framed to them selues according to their phansies Nowe Reader hauing heard the mindes of the great learned and holie Fathers of the Churche as touchinge the difficultie of the scriptures the Luther ād zuīg their straunge doctrines Luther in Assertiō reading also and vnderstanding of the same of whom also and at whose handes ye must learne the vnderstanding of them what trueth ys to be thought in Luther and Zuinglius whiche so plainlie to the contrarie arrogantlie affirme the scriptures to be easie and plain for all men to vnderstand make yt free for all men to read and expowde them teache that not onelie men but also womē maye openlie preache the woorde of God And for the mainteinance of the same most wickedlie auouche all chrysten men and women to be preistes and to all theise mischeiuouse and wicked heresies adde this most pestilent heresie that as well a childe and a woman absolueth as the Bishoppe O Lord how manifestlie repugnante be theise pestiferouse assertions vnto the scriptures howe moche confownding and breaking the orde of the catholique Churche howe farre dissenting from all the holie Fathers Luther cōtrarie to himself yea and in some of theise how moche dothe Luther dissent from him self In one booke he teacheth as ys saied before that ther ys no difficultie in lib. de seruo arbitrio Luthers prowdbragges and lies the scriptures and boasting himself to be ignorant in no parte of them provoketh all men to bring him anie one place that he can not expownde This ys one mete to be an Heresiarch in Satans Sinagog that to gett him credite with his disciples extolleth him self with Luciferane pride accōpanied with falshood and lieng euen vnto the heauens But saincte Augustine endewed with an other Spirit and depressing and making himself lowe saieth of himself thus Fateor me in scripturis Dei plura nescire quam scire I acknowledge miself not to knowe mo thinges in the scriptures of God then to knowe Thus saieth saincte Augustin And yt ys easie for all men to iudge that betwixt theise two their ys no comparison whether ye haue respecte to excellencie of learning or sanctimony of lief But what trueth ys yn this saieng of Luther his owne woordes in an Luther in praefatione super psalmos other place shall be iudge thus he saieth Quocirca ingenuè me confiteri oportet me ignorare an legitimam habeam psalmorum intelligentiam wherfor I must francklie confesse that I am ygnorant whether I haue the lawfull vnderstanding of the psalmes or no. And a litle after that he saieth again Scio impudentissimae temeritatis eum esse qui audeat profiteri vnum librum scripturae à se in omnibus partibus intellectum I knowe him to be saieth Luther of most impudent Luther speaketh diuerselie as though he were not one but two diuerse mē rashnesse or foolish blodnesse that dare saie that he vnderstandeth anie one booke of the scripture in all partes Conferr theise two saienges with his other sentence before and then iudge of the Spirit of the man wolde ye not thinke them the sainges raither of two men the one sobre and the other drunke or the one sobre and the other stark madde When I conferred him in his first saing with saincte Augustin yt semed to me that I hearde Goliath and Dauid the condicions of the parties so well resembled eche other Neuerthelesse howe wicked so euer his Spirit and doctrine ys ther haue ben and yet be to manie that embrace and folowe the same For haue not The peoples arrogante irreuerēcia to diuiue matters the people vpon this persuasion of the easinesse of the scriptures taken a great boldnesse to read and dispute of the highest and hardest matters of all the scriptures Wil they not dispute and determine in predestinacon Ys yt not a common matter almost at euerie meting that man hath no free will Do not the Tauerns sownde of iustificacion Are not Barbre Shopps Schooles teaching God to be cause of Sinne doo not Innes and Alehouses swarme with disputers of the Sacramentes Howe manie ther be what ys the force of them what ys the Sacrament of the Altare what ys the woorthinesse of yt And what yt conteineth Do not the mouthes of women boies and Girles breath oute most filthie stincking and abhominable Blasphemie against this blessed Sacrament and the ministracon of the same in streetes high waies and feldes Ah Lord ys this the reuerence that aught to be geuen to the
sore against mankinde For sinne we hearde Thowe arte earth and into earth thowe shalt retourn But for asmoche as Chryst woolde ouerthrowe by his flesh this cruell Tyranne therfore that was shadowed among the olde Fathers in a misterie and they being sanctified withe the flesh and blood of a shepe God so willing did escape the plague aÌ„d destructioÌ„ Wher for then thowe Iewe art thow troubled seing nowe the trueth long before prefigurated why I saie arte thowe troubled yf Chryste do saie Except ye cate the flesh of the sonne of man and drink his bloode ye shall haue no life in yowe seing yt behoueth thee beinge instructed in Moises lawes aÌ„d taught by the olde shaddowes to beleue to be most readie to vnderstaÌ„d these misteries Thowe haest knowen the shaddowe aÌ„d the figure Learn therfor the veritie of the thing My flesh saieth he ys verilie meat and my blood ys verilie drinke Thus farre Cyrill Whome ye haue hearde at lenght declaring the figuratiue Paschall laÌ„be and the benefit that the Iewes had by the same Likewise ye haue heard him declaring the true Paschall Lambe and the benefite that commeth to vs therbie And when he hath applied the figure to the thing figured whiche ys the trueth of the figure as a matter sufficieÌ„tlie taught ther to be beleued of the Iewes He falleth into a wonder at the incredulitie of theÌ„ and reprouinge them all in the person of one saieth Why arte thowe o Iewe troubled seing nowe the verie veritie long before this prefigurated Yt behoued thee being instructed by Moises Lawes and verie well taught by the olde shadowes to beleue to be most readie to vnderstande these misteries Yf Cyrill did so earnestlie reproue the Iewes for their incredulitie being taught but by Moyses and the figures howe wolde he reproue our men who well instructed not by Moyses but by Chryste not by shaddowes and figures but by the gospell of treuth and veritie not moued as the Iewes semed to be to beleue a straunge noueltie but an aunciente faithe receared of antiquitie Yf the Iewes I saie be woorthie of reproche who knowe not the true faithe whiche they neuer yet had by plain knowledge receaued False Christians worthilie reproued for saking their faith how moche more be our false Chrystians to be reproued which the faithe that they were brought vppe in that they once embraced and receaued that they earnestlie beleued nowe haue maliciouslie not onelie contemned but also Reuiled detested and abiected God that ys the verie light lighten their heartes that they maie see into howe depe damnacion they haue deiected and cast them selues by their forsaking of the catholique faith being nowe bare and void of all excuse forsomoche as they did once knowe the trueth whiche nowe deuelishlie they blaspheme Si non venissem locutus eis fuissem peccatum non haberent nuÌ„c autem excusationem non habent de peccato suo Yf I had not commed saied Chryst Joan 15. and spokeÌ„ to them they shoulde not haue had sinne but nowe they haue none excuse of their sinne God I saie therfore haue mercie vpon them whilest time of mercie for them endureth and geue them grace dailie with the Prophett Dauid to crie and saie Respice exaudi me Domine Deus meus Illumina oculos meos ne vnquam obdormiam in morte ne quando dicat inimicus meus praeualui aduersus eum Consider Psal 12. and heare me o Lorde my God lighten mine eies that I sheape not in death lest mine enemis saie I haue preuailed against him What a preie and Spoill ys yt to our gostlie enemie and howe moche dothe he reioice when he deceaueth one that hath ben in the true faith and beâ—ieueth him of the same and so driueth him from God No doubte he counteth yt a great Spoill and reioiceth moch at yt as the verse of the same psalme immediatelie folowing dothe saie Qui tribulant me exultabunt si motus fuero They that trouble me will reioice at yt yf I becast down Return therfor in time and cleaue hard to the streight and strong piller of trueth For if ye be cast downe ye shall fall verie lowe and sinke depe Chryste sending his Apostles to preache taught them thus Into what cittie soeuer ye shall come enquire who ys worthie in yt and ther abide Math. 10. till ye go thence and whosoeuer shall not receaue yowe nor will heare yowe preachinge when ye departe oute of that house or cittie shake of the dust of yowe feete Verilie I saie vnto yowe yt shall be easier for the lande of Sodom and Gomorre in the daie of Iudgement then for that citte Consider therfore and heauie hand of God vpon Sodom and gomorre which in soche terrible sorte being sonke and destroied with fire and Brimstone from heauen argueth a more terrible damnacion to ensewe and folowe and yet yt shall be more easie to them in the daie of Iudgement then to soche as will not receaue faith Howe moche more greuouse then shall yt be to them which forsake that faith that not onelie they them selues haue receaued but the wholl Churche of Chryst throughoute all Chrystendom whiche faithe although yt hath diuerse times ben impugned as nowe in theise daies yt ys Yet God be praised yt was neuer ouerthowen nor neuer shall be and will cleaue to an heresie whiche hath ben not onelie sundrie and diuerse times ympugned but ouerthrowen condemned cursed and extincted Surelie as their reproche ys moche in this worlde for their so doing So shall yt be moche more before the face of God and his electe in the daie of his terrible iudgement But I will retourn from whence I haue digressed and touche one note more of Cyrill and so passe to other After he had thus rebuked the Iewes for their hardnesse of beleue he saied Vmbram figuram nosti disce ergo ipsam rei veritatem Thow hauest knowen the Shaddow and the figure learn therfore the verie thinge Note here again as before in Chrysostom ys noted that the olde Paschall lambe was a figure and owre Paschall Lambe the verie thinge Then yt ys not a peice of bread a bare sign or figure of Chryst for then these sainges of the learned Fathers were not true whiche saie plainlie that yt ys the verie thinge And this Father when he had willed the Iewes to learn the verie thing he declared furthwith what the verie thing ys Caro mea verè est cibus sanguis meus verè est potus My flesh saieth Chryst ys verilie meat and my bloode ys verilie drinke This saieth Cyrill ys the verie thing of the figure the verie flesh and bloode of Christ whiche be verilie meat and verilie drinke Howe this texte and other apperteining to the same matter in the sixte of S. Iohn haue ben wrested and wried and violentliie drawen by the enemies of gods trueth from their natiue and true sense yt shall be shewed more at large in the second
in dede And therfor he verie well bringheth the possibilitie of two workes vpon one thing namely that yt ys as possible for Chryst to make his flesh the meate of men as yt was to make the flesh whiche was earthlie nowe to be hauenly And so this Authour concludeth that the flesh of Chryst ys as reallie eaten of men as yt ys made heauenlie of Chryst But Chryst hath made yt heauenly wherfore he maketh yt to be eaten reallie Of this scripture Petrus Cluniacensis maketh a verie goodlie exposition paraphrasticallie Si videritis filium hominis ascendentem vbi erat prius Spiritus est qui viuificat caro non prodest quicquam hoc est quia me hominem inter homines videtis Petrus Cluniacen nihil de me adhuc quod ad hoc Sacramentum spectat plusquam de alio homine sentire potestis Et i leò carnaliter sapientes velut per frusta concisam carnem meam me vobis velle dare creditis Sed postquam in coelum ascendero postquam hanc carnem de qua agitur adhuc mortalem in Deum glorificauero tunc intelligetis quia Spiritus est qui viuificat hoc est spiritualliter intellecta accepta viuificant Caro autem non prodest quicquam quia carnaliter intellecta mortificant Dabo enim carnem meam hominibus non more cadauerum detruncandam minuendam consumendam quia sic accepta caro mea non prodesset quicquā sed dabo eam absque dolore diuidendam absque imminutione partiendam absque consumptione comedendam quia Spiritus est qui viuificat quia sic accepta intellecta caro mea vitam non mortalem sed aeternam percipientibus donat What if ye see the Sonne of man ascende vppe where he was before Yt ys the Spirit that quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing that ys bicause ye see me a man among men ye can nothing more vnderstand of me for somoche as apperteineth to the Sacrament then ye can of an other man And therfore vnderstanding This ys the maner of our Sacrament aries carnally ye beleue that I will geue my flesh to yowe as cutt in lumpes or peices but after that I ascende into heauen after that I shall glorifie this flesh of the whiche we nowe speake being yet mortall into God then ye shall vnderstand that yt ys the Siprit that quickneth that ys that these my woordes spiritually taken do quicken but the flesh prositteh nothing For This ys the faith of all catholikes carnally vnderstanded they kill I will geue my flesh vnto men not after the maner of dead karkases to be cutt in peices one from an other to be diminished to be consumed For my flesh so taken should not profitt anie thing But I will geue yt withoute greif to be diuided without diminucion to be parted withoute consumption to be eaten For yt ys the Spirit that quickneth And my flesh so taken and vnderstanded yt geueth to the receauers not mortall life but eternall Thus farre Petrus Cluniacen In this Authour as in the other before ye see that expowndeh he not this why Christ made mencion of hys ascension John vi saing of Chryst of his ascension into heauen that the reall presence of his bodie shoulde not be in the Sacrament but onely Chryst made mencion of his ascension to pull them from that grosse maner of eating of his flesh that they thought he wolde geue them lumpes or peices of that his visible flesh in carnall and grosse maner as a man wolde geue a peice of beof or mutton to one to eate And that his bodie so eaten shoulde be dead and so finally consumed and therfor yt self as they thought being mortall they merueiled howe yt shoulde make the eaters of yt ymmortall and howe yt being eaten and so consumed and ended shoulde make the eaters of yt continue for euer and to haue none ende To reforme this their vain and grosse ymagination he tolde them of his ascension But for his presence in the Sacrament as the holie Churche beleueth and teacheth his verie bodie in visible forme ys ascended and yet the same verie bodie in substance ys present inuisiblie in the Sacrament and ys wholly receaued of euery receauer Whiche maner this authour dothe very well seetfurth when he saied in the person of Chryste I will geue my flesh to men not after the maner of dead karkases to be cutt in peices to be diminished to be consumed for my flesh so taken shoulde nothing profitt but I will geue my flesh withoute greif to be diuided withoute diminucion to be parte dwith oute consumption to be eaten Thus ye maie perceaue that though the grosse maner of the vnbeleuing disciples be reprehended yet the faithfull maner of the beleuing Chrystians ys approued and therby also as the wresting of this scripture ys espied So ys their heresie by the same truly nowe declared and expownded reiected and refused Wherfore I will nowe leaue this scripture and go to the next THE SIX AND THIRTTETH CHAP. TREACTETH of the next text by S. Austen and Chrysostom SPiritus est qui viuificat caro non prodest quicquā yt ys the spirit that quickneth the flesh profitteth nothing This text the Aduersaries haue not a litle Joan. 6. triumphed on and haue made yt so familiar that boies and girles coulde blatter this against Chrystes presence in the Sacrament The flesh profiteth nothing My saing therfor left aparte I will laie the sainges and expositions of the Fathers before the reader and then shall ye see whether these wicked schoolemasters haue not well taught their wicked scholers and yonge ympes to blaspheme Chrystes blessed flesh saing that yt profiteth nothing and also howe well they wrest the scripture and violentlie plucke yt and teare yt as yt were from the natiue sense The first coople to shewe vs the exposition of this text shall be S. Augustine and Chrysostom S. Augustine saieth thus Quid est quod adiungit Spiritus est qui viuificat caro non prodest quicquam Dicamus ei patitur enim nos non contradicentes sed nosce cupientes Tract 27. in Joan. O Domine magister bone quomodò caro non prodest quicquam cùm tu dixeris Nisi quis manducauerit carnem meam biberit sanguinem meum non habebit in se vitam An vita non prodest quicquam propter quid sumus quod sumus nisi vt habeamus vitam aeternam quam tua carne promittis Quid est ergo Non prodest quicquam Caro non prodest quicquam sed quomodò illi intellexerunt Carnem quippe sic intellexerunt quomodò in cadauere dilaniatur aut in macello venditur non quomodò spiritu vegetatur Prōptè sic dictum est Caro non prodest quicquam quomodò dictum est Scientia inflat I am ergo debemus odisse scientiam Absit Et quid est Scientia inslat sola sine charitate Ideo adtunxit Charitas verò
heauē which Chryst our Sauiour by his blod hath bought vs to we shall be cōdēpned to that pain that we were once redemed frō ād so eternallie become miserable with him vnto whoos 's wordes we wolde geue credditte before the woordes of our Lorde God As nowe ye perceaue howe like the tēptacions be so maie ye perceaue howe like the rewarde of the assēting or agreing to the tēptaciō of the enemie ys Yf therfor ye will auoide the rewarde which ys pain eternal withstād the temptacion whiche beginneth the thrall A mong manie other two thinges methinketh shoulde with the assistēce of Two thinges which aught to moue vs to resist the temptatiōs of the Sacramentaries gods grace moche moue yowe to withstād his wicked tēptacions in this be half the one ys that as in the first tēptaciō to our first parentes he spake the plain cōtrarie of that God had spokē so in this his tēptacon he speaketh the verie contrarie to that that Chryst our Lorde God hath spoken For Chryst saied This ys my bodie But Sathā saieth yt ys not his bodie Now whē anie thing ys taught that ys manifestlie repugnant to the woorde of our Lorde God who cā speak nothing but trueth except we be woorse bewitched them the Galathians were we must nedes deme and iudge that doctrine to be false coming from Sathan the father of lies vntrueth and falshod And being false what ells ys to be doen but to withstande and reiecte yt The other thing that aught to moue vs to withstād this tēptaciō ys that Sectes of Sacramentaries Bereng Wicleff Io. Hus. the woordes of his doctrine be not consonant nor agreable For besides his diuerse and cōtrarie spirit which he breathed into Berengarius the first publique and open impugner of this blessed misterie as yt ys saied in the preface of this book into Wiceff and Hus he hath in this our time poured oute manie contrarie spitites and meruelouslie shewed himself the authour of dissētion and repugnant doctrine in the same misterie But for that I might be iudged partiall in the report of this diuerse doctrine I will not vse mie owne woordes but the woordes of Luther Satans cheif and first Commissionar in this maner of proceading and of Melancthon his right ofspring and defendour of his doctrine Luther in his breif confession noting the diuerse and repugnant spirittes that reigned amongest the Sacramentaries saieth in this maner At the first Eight disaegreing spirittes amōg the Sacramentaries nombred by Luther Carolstad Zwinglius Oecolamp Swenckfel these men were well warned of the holie Gost when that vpon that one text they diuided them selues into seuen spirits eche one differing allwaies from the other First Carolstadius wold haue the text so that this ys my bodie should signifie here sitteth my bodie Then Zwinglius saieth that that coulde not be well saied no though the Father of heauen had reueiled yt Therfor being moued with an other holie spirit of his own thus he turned the text Take eate this signifieth my bodie The thirde Oecolampadius brought furth his third holie spirit which turned that text into an other hew as thus Take eate this ys the token of my bodie The fourth Swenckfeldius thinking to make his stench to smell as muske brought vs furth of his holie spirit this rule These woordes this ys my bodie must be remoued from oure seight For they do let vs of the spirituall vnderstanding The fifth holie spirit being but excrementes of that other doth thus read that text Take and eate that which ys deliuered for yowe in this my bodie The sixt holie spirit saieth Take and eate this ys my bodie in remembrance as though Chryst had saied Take and eate this ys the monument of my bodie The seuenth holie spirit Ioannes Campanus bringeth this exposition Take and eate this ys my breadie bodie or bodie of bread Beside all these an other spirit flieth Ioan. Cam aboute For the Deuell ys an holie and great spirit whiche persuadeth men that herein ys no article of oure faith and therfor we aught not to contend of this matter but leaue yt free to euery man to beleue herein what he list Thus farre Luther See ye not by Luthers one woordes seuen and in th end of his collection one mo to make eight dissonant and disagreable doctrines vpon these woordes of Chryst This ys my bodie See ye not Sathan diuided against Sathan See ye not his ministres plaing at crosse wasters for the victorie Be persuaded then that wher soche contencion soche strife soche Battaill ys amongest men springing all oute of one Gospell that in that Gospell ys no treuth But we haue not yet seen the ende Melanchton the right of spring and heire of the Lutheran doctrine was not onelie intoxicated with a diuerse spirit from his Father and Fiue sectes of Sacramētaries amōg the Lutherans nombred by Melanct. master Martin Luther in the ende of his life but also reporteth that among the Lutherans them selues ther were fiue Sacramentaries sectes or heresies For some saieth he be of Helhusius minde some of Sarcerius minde some other folowe the ministers of Breme and some Ioachimus Morlinus other also he alleageth whose opinion ys that Chrystes bodie maie be in euery place Whiche sectes being fiue in nombre yf ye put them to the eight enombred by Luther they make thirtene Thus by their own report yt ys to be perceaued that the woordes of Sathans doctrine be not of one sownde of one agreeement but his spirit Chrystes woordes wrested to sixtene diuerse senses by the Protestants hath breathed into his disciples vpon these fewe woordes of Chryst diuerse and and plain repugnant expositions and doctrines To these thirtene diuerse doctrines yf we adde and putto the expositions of Luther himself Melanchton and Caluine whiche esteemed them selues as the lightes of the worlde we shall make vppe sixtene diuerse expositions and doctrines of this matter fettfurth by Sathans disciples As for Luther yt ys euindent that he expounded Chrystes woordes farre vnlike to Zuinglius Oecolāpadius or anie of that line yea vnto Berengarius himself For he saieth they must be thus vnderstāded This ys my bodie that ys this bread ys my bodie Melanchton in his later daies as yt ys common to heretiques to growe worse and worse forsooke Luthers spirit and tasted of Zwinglius spirit Melancth His mutabilitie but so as he wolde in soch wise correct him that he wolde make him a newe spirit And therfor he wolde haue this sense vpon Chrystes woordes This ys my bodie that ys This ys a participacion of my bodie whiche newe interpretacion saieth Staphilus ys plainlie a newe Sacramentaries heresie Last of all the doctrine of Caluine swarueth from all these teaching that Chryst ys geuen to vs reallie but not corporallie as though the sense of Io. Caluine Chrystes woordes might be This ys my bodie that ys This ys the verie substance of my bodie but it ys
maie be by this perceaued that the Aduersaries figuratiue speache hath no place as they vnderstande yt in this saing of Chryste But this ys raither to be saied that his interprise in so wresting and abusing of Chrystes woordes ys wicked and detestabele For yf that sense might haue ben here vpon these woordes placed who can doubte that S. Ambrose so often rehersing them wolde not in one place or other haue reported the true sense and saied yt had ben but a signe But forasmoche as in no place he so doeth but continuallie and constantlie saieth yt ys the bodie of Chryst let no man doubte of the trueth of that that he teacheth Consecracion the terme of the Papistes vsed of S. Ambr. seriousâ—ie but embracing that let him flie the feigned figures In these sainges also of S. Ambrose this ys breiflie to be touched with a note that wher the Aduersarie in skorne when he happeneth to speake of this woorde consecracion for the most parte addeth as the Papistes teare yt yet ye perceaue that yt ys vsed of S. Ambrose and not sknorned And howe so euer yt liketh him to dallie and trifle withe that woorde yet S. Ambrose in so weightie a matter dothe vse the woorde seriouslie And if for that he vseth this woorde the Aduersarie will also accompte him for a papist I had leuer be a Papist wiht the one then an heretique with the other But yt ys time to call in an other coople THE THREE AND FIFTETH CHAP. CONTINVeth in the exposition of Chrystes woordes by Gregorie Nissen and S. Hierom. AS a man permitted to come into a councell chambre and admitted through speciall fauoure to talke withe eche of the counselours and haue their senerall aduertisementes howe he shall safelie beare him self in the state that he ys called vnto or as a man desierouse to be resolued in a matter of learning entreth an assembley of learned men and gentlie receaued heareth their seuerall iudgementes vttered with great and full agreement to his full resolucion and contentacion can not be but therwith moche delighted so I trust the reader being as yt were in Godes counsell chambre or in Gods Schoole and hearing the aduertisementes and iudgementes of Gods counselours and learned men so seuerallie and yet so agreablie vttered to his full and perfect resolucion I trust I saie he ys delighted and the more for that all these with whiche he hath conference and yet for a good nombre shall haue be all verie auncient and with in the compasse of sixe hondreth yeares after Chryst Wherfor let vs in Gods name proceade with delight and pleasure to heare the other that remain to be conferred with all for they be as ys saied a good nombre of theÌ„ bothe auncient and learned and though all be not auncient yet all learned and approued Of these auncientes that remain the first ys Gregorie Nissen the brother of S. Basill and therfor in the greke church meet next to folowe him This ys his iudgement in this matter Thus he writeth Qua ex cause panis in co corpore mutatus in diuinam virtutem transiit eadem de causa idem nunc fit Vt enim illic verbi Greg. Nissen anserm catathetico de diuinis sacram Dei gratia sanctum efficit illud corpus cuius firmamentum ex pane constabat ipsum etiam quodammodò panis erat sic panis vt ait Apostolus per verbum Dei orationem sanctificatur non quia comeditur eo progrediens vt Verbi corpus euadat sed statim per verbum in corpus mutatur vt dictum est à Verbo Hoc est corpus meum By what cause bread in that bodie chaunged passed into the diuine vertue by the same cause that same thinge ys nowe doen. For as ther the grace of the Sonne of God made that bodie whose substanciall nutriment was of bread and yt also in a maner was bread so also this bread as the Apostle saieth ys sanctisied by the woorde of God and praier not tending to this poinct that bicause yt ys eaten yt ys the bodie of the Sonne of God but that furthwith by the woorde yt ys chaunged into the bodie as yt was saied of the Sonne This ys my bodie By this authour who vndoubtedlie geueth a notable testimonie for the veritie of the Sacrament be ouerthrowen three heresies in the same matter Three heresies ouerthrowen by one saing of Gregor Nissen Of the whiche Luther or at the least the Lutherans did settfurth one which was that the Sacrament was the bodie of Chryst if yt were receaued and to him that receaued yt yt was the bodie of Chryst otherwise yt was not Another ys sett furth bothe by Luther and all the Lutherans and by Oecolampadius and all the Oecolampadians and by this Proclamer whiche ys that the bread and wine be not chaunged into the substance of the bodie and bloode of Chryst of the whiche we haue somwhat at large spoken before The thirde ys settfurth by Carolstadius Oecolampadius and their disciples and also by this Proclamer whiche ys that Chrystes substanciall bodie ys not verilie present in the Sacrament Against these three this authour teacheth vs very good documentes according to that that the catholique Churche now teacheth And nowe for the first that the Lutherans doo teache wher they saie that in the Sacrament ys the bodie of Chryst to him that receaueth the Sacrament otherwise yt ys not the bodie of Chryst this authour hath direct What warrant haue the LutheraÌ„s for this woordes to the contrarie wher he saieth Hic panis sanctificatur per verbum Dei orationem non quia comeditur eo progrediens vt verbi corpus euadat This bread ys sanctified by the woorde of God and praier not tending to this poinct that bicause yt ys eaten therfore yt ys the bodie of the Sonne of God So that yt ys not receauing or not receauing eating or not eating that causeth the presence of Chrystes bodie in the Sacrament Receauing or notreceauing causeth nor presence nor absence of Chrystes bodie in the Sacr. but the power of God with the woorde of Chryst as before ys saied The cause of so great a worke as to make present the bodie of Chryst dependeth not of so simple and weake cause as the will of man whiche yt should dooe if yt should depende vpon the receipte For yf the man wolde receaue yt then were yt the bodie of Chryste yf he wolde not receaue yt were not the bodie of Chryst so willing and not willing shoulde make bodie or no bodie after that fonde opinion But to adde somwhat beside the authoritie of this auncient Father which ys more then sufficient to conuince so vain and foolish an heresie what apparance haue they of anie scripture or holie writer For substanciall grownde in ame of them both they haue none to make some shewe or counteinance for the maintenance of their heresie yt ys certen that they haue
of blessing that ys of thankesgeuing For hauing him in handes we geue vndoubtedlie thankes vnto him who for owre sake hath shed oute his bloode and hath esteemed vs woorthie of vnspeakeable giftes He did not saie participacion but communicacion that he might expresse somwhat more that ys to saie a most near coniunction But that that he hath saied ys after this maner This bloode whiche ys conteined in the cuppe ys the same that flowed oute of the side of Chryste This when we take we participate that ys to saie we are conioined to Chryst Thus Theophilact Yf thow reader desierest to be instructed howe this text ys to be vnderstanded and what ys the verie minde of sainct Paule yf euer man did clerely expownd yt no man more plainlier then this although Chrysostom and Oecumenius as plainly and almost by the same woordes Consider therfore Theophilact cōmended this exposition well and credit yt and thowe shalt atteign to the true sense and mening of sainct Paule Ther ys nothing to be desiered in this man that ys necessarilie required to one to whome creditte shoulde be geuen He ys so auncient that he was before anie controuersie as touching the presence of Chryst in the Sacrament for he was before Berengarius And after the councell of Sisimius in the tripartite historie they are to be called li. 9 ca. 19. to the decision or dissolucion of a controuersie whiche wrote before that controuersie was risen and forsomoche as this authour did so therfore he maie well be called to this matter That he ys vncorrupted I suppose the Aduersarie will depose For yt ys knowen to all men learned that Oecolampadius did translate him owte of greke into latin whose sinceritie and dexteritie in the doing of anie soch matter they that be of that side can not asmoche as once suspect And although he hath in other places offended and vitiated him yet here he hath not Learning ther lacketh none in this authour for that he doth ys by imitacion of Chrysostom whose sentences and matters being setfurth at lenght this man doth collect and in a breif maner settfurth By which fact as we be sure that that ys setfurth ys learned matter So be we sure that the setterfurth ys without all doubte learned for soch a worke can not be doen of an vnlearned man And besides that the voice of all learned men doth with moch estimacion and praise so commende him And therfore he ys so reputed esteemed and taken Breiflie ther was neuer yet authour that euer yt happened me to read that did either for learning trueth or anie other soche like matter make as moch as a note of anie reprehension or declared anie thinge that was to be desiered in Theophilact Therfore seing all thinges be in him that are required to be in an authour he ys withoute all exception woorthie of creditte and in this matter as a wittnesse maie iustlie be produced The same blood that flowed oute of the side of Chryste ys in the cuppe euen by the minde of S. Paule In this exposition then wher no tropes no signes no figures of the blood of Chryst be admitted but the presence of the verie bloode taught to be in the cuppe yea and the verie same that flowed oute of the side of Christ what can we or maie we ells do but so take yt that ys that sainct Paule when he saied The cuppe of blessing which we blesse ys a partaking of the bloode of Christ spake of no figure nor by no figure But of the substanciall bloode of Chryst to be verilie in the cuppe of blessing whiche we also take and receaue and so be verilie partakers of the bloode of Chryste and partaking yt be conioined to Chryst as this authour saieth And here ys to be noted that Theophilact doth not here speake as shewing his owne minde but opening vnto vs the minde and meaning of sainct Paul and therfore saieth Quod autem dixit tale est That he saied ys this or after thys maner as who should saie this ys yt that he saied So that this exposition ys to be taken as the woordes of S. Paule for that yt dothe declare the minde Peter Martir his wresting of Theophil vpon the woorde vertue and meaning of S. Paule Neither ys Peter Martyr to be hearde who wolde peruert all the negatiues of Theophilact wherbie he denieth in sondrie and diuerse places that the Sacrament ys onely a figure of Chrystes bodie as in the xxvi of S. Matthew in the xiiii of sainct Marke in the vi of sainct Iohn and ther auoucheth the verie reall presence by expresse woordes The saied Peter Martyr wolde I saie taking a small occasion of a woord vpon the xiiii of S. Marke by violent pressing euen turne the face of theophilact backwarde and make him looke Vide ca. 60. li. 2. an other waie and to speake a directe contrarie sentence to that that he spake within ten lines before In the xiiii of S. Marke to proue the woordes of Chyst This ys my body to be no figuratiue speach he bringeth in the saing of Chryst in the vi of S. Iohn and saieth thus Dominus enim dicit Panis quem ego dabo caro mea est non dixit Theoph. in 14. Marci figura est carnis meae sed caro mea est Et iterum Nisi ederitis carnem filii hominis quomodò inquis caro videtur O homo propter nostram infirmitatem istud fit Quia enim panis vinum ex his sunt quibus assueuimus ea non abhorremus Idcirco misericors Deus nostrae infirmitati condescendens speciem quidem panis vini seruat in virtutem autem carnis sanguinis transelementat Owre Lord saieth The bread that I wil geue ys my flesh ▪ He saied not yt ys a figure of my flesh but yt ys my flesh And The flesh of Chryste in the B. Sacrament appeareth not for oure infirmities sake again Except ye eate the flesh of the Sonne of man And howe saiest thow ys not the flesh seen O man this ys doen for our infirmitie For bicause bread and wine be of these thinges vnto the which we haue ben accustomed we doe not abhorre them Therfor our mercifull God condescending to our infirmitie dothe kepe the outwardes formes of bread and wine but he turneth the substance into the vertue of flesh and bloode Here wolde Peter Martyr as ys saied wrest Theophilact that he wolde haue no reall presence and therfore that we receaue not the verie flesh and blood of Chryst in the Sacrament but the vertue of them But Reader I haue ascribed the full sentence of Theophilact to the entent that thow maist see that if anie soch sense should be gathered of him yt maie well appeare to thee that yt ys violentlie wrested and not truly according to the minde of the authour alleadged nor expownded And for proof of this first obserue and note that Theophilact
their vntrueth and their deuelish setting furth of the same and to kepe vs in in the right waie that we erre not with them if we will geue eare to good ād holsome doctrine And therfore seing God hath sent soche plentie of good authours yt were pitie but that they shoulde be brought furth wherby God in his trueth maie glorified and his people in the same edefied Of all these that remain first cometh to hande the learned grecian Euthymius who withoute all darke maner of speache openeth to vs the true vnderstanding Euth in 26 Matth. of S. Paules saing Thus he writeth Quemadmodum panis confortat ita Christi corpus hoc facit ac magis etiarn corpus animam sanctificat Et sicut vinum taetificat ita sanguis Christi hoc facit insuper praesidium efficitur Quodsi de vno corpore sanguine omnes fideles participamus omnes vnum sumus per ipsam horum Flesh vnited to the Sonne of God by assumption the same vnited to vs by participacion myst eriorum participationem in Christo omnes Christus in omnibus Qui edit inquit meam carnem bibit meum sanguinem in me manet ego in eo Verbum siquidem per assumptionem carni vnitum est baec rursus caro vnitur nobis per participationem As bread doth comforte so doeth the bodie of Chryst also this and more yt sanctifieth both bodie and soule And as wine dothe make gladde Euen so the blood of Chryst doth this also and moreouer yt ys made a defence And if all the faithfull do partake of one bodie and bloode we are all one by the same participacion of the mysteries For all be in Chryst and Chryst in all he that eateth saieth he my slesh and drinketh my bloode dwelleth in me and I in him For truely the Sonne of God ys vnited to the flesh by assumption Thys flesh again ys vnited to vs by participacion Thus Euthym. I nede not as to me yt semeth to saie anie thing to the opening of this authours minde For he ys both plain in himself and also plainlie dothe open the minde of sainct Paule vnto vs. Whose sentence he setteth furth in the plain tearmes and leaueth the tropes For wher sainct Paule saieth that we that eate of one bread and drinke of one cuppe are one bodie He saieth that we that partake of one bodie and bloode are made one So that wher the text calleth Bread and cuppe in S. Paule meē the bodie ād blood c. yt bread the expositour calleth yt the bodie and what the text calleth the cuppe that this authour calleth the bloode Wherfore the true mening must be taken as the expositour doth expownde yt For somoche then as the expositour doth expownd the bread and the cuppe calling them the bodie and the blood yt can not be auoided but that yt ys so except the Aduersarie will saie that the text expowndeth the exposition For vnto that sense that he wolde wrest all the authours vnto the text ys more nearer then the exposition The aduersarie wolde haue yt bread and the text calleth yt bread The Aduersarie wolde not haue yt the bodie of Chryst but this authour saieth yt ys the bodie of Chryst Wherfore to the sense of the Aduersarie the text ys more clere then the exposition And so yt cometh to passe as before ys saied that the text expowndeth the exposition whiche ys after the maner of other of their doinges For they turn the catte in the panne and make light darknesse and darknesse light But thowe Reader be thowe sure that Chryst who hath promised his holie spiritte to his Church which ys the pillour of the trueth hath not left yt contratie to his promisse destitute of this guide of trueth these thousand yeares but yt was that Spiritt that did leade the minde and the penne of these holy Fathers to vnderstand and perceaue the true sense of the scriptures and so to write yt to vs. God hath left vnto vs bread euen the holie scripture to feede vs withall but as he bidde his Apostles to breake the breade that he had Ioan. 6. Bread of the woord of God how yt ys brokē blessed for the siue thousand people so by his mynistres in the church he hath commaunded the bread of the scripture to be broken to the people and what ys yt to breake yt but to expownd yt And why shoulde they expownd yt yf their were not places to be opened and cleared by exposition And therfore I saie these holie fathers being appointed to breake this bread of the woorde of God vnto vs ther ys no doubte but as they had learned of the master of trueth so they brake yt truly vnto vs and haue geuen vs the true vnderstanding of yt And therfore the bread and the cuppe expownded by so manie to be the bodie and bloode of Chryst yt must nedes be true that by so manie and so manie yeares hath with concorde and consent withoute contradiction ben preached taught and written This also ys not to be ouerpassed that thys Authour leaueth yt not vntaught howe we are made all one in Chryst bicause saieth he we do all partake of one bodie and bloode we are all made one by the participacion of the mysteries So that although he well knewe that we are all made one in Chryst by faith and charitie yet he also saieth that we are made one by the participacion of the mysteries And that yt shoulde moste manifestlie well be be perceaued what maner of vnion this ys of the whiche he speaketh here when he had alleaged the saing of Chryst He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood dwelleth in me and I him mening therby to proue this vnion he by most plain woordes openeth the same saing The Sonne of God ys vnited to the flesh by assumption this flesh again ys vnited to vs by participacion wherby yt ys very manifest that we are vnited to Chryst by the vnion of his flesh For that flesh vnto the whiche the Sonne of God was vnited that same ys vnited to vs. Chryst was vnited to vs by his incarnacion we be vnited to him by participacion c. So that as Chryst was vnited to vs by taking of our flesh in his incarnacion and so was made one with vs In like maner we are vnited to him by the taking of his flesh in the Sacrament and are therby made one with him Wherfore note that he saieth not that we are in the receipt of the Sacrament vnited to Chryst by faith but by participacion of his flesh And yet this authour was not ignorant that we are also vnited to Chryst by faith But minding to open the peculiar commoditie of this mysterie he teacheth that by flesh we are vnited to Chryst Consider therfore Reader that wher the Aduersarie trauaileth to obscure and hide the benefittes of God whiche he geueth to the woorthie receauers of his
wicked assertion of the Sacramentaries who against all trueth that maie be learned in scriptures and the most auncient Fathers teache that neither Chrystes verie naturall flesh ys receaued in the Sacrament neither that Chryst ys naturallie in vs but onely spirituallie The contrarie wherof ys not onely by this Authour in plain woordes taught but also by Chrysostome and sainct Cyrill as before ys shewed That sainct Hilarie intended by his disputacion to confute the Arrians denieng Chryst to be naturallie in vs and also the holie Gost as yt maie be thought left the same to confute the Sacramentaris yt doeth verie well appeare by a conclusion that he maketh vpon the same disputacion thus sainge Haec idcireo à nobis commemorata sunt quia voluntatis tantùm inter Patrem Filium vnitatem haeretici mentientes vnitatis nostrae ad Deum vtebantur exemplo tanquam nobis ad Filium per filium ad Patrem obsequio tantùm ac voluntate religionis vnitis nulla per Sacramentum sanguinis naturalis communionis proprietas indulgeretur cùm per honorem nobis datum Dei filii per manentem in nobis carnaliter Dei filium in eo nobis corporaliter inseparabiliter vnitis mysterium verae ac naturalis vnitatis sit praedicandum These thinges are for this cause spoken of vs that heretiques vntruely saing the vnitie betwixt the Father and the Sonne to be onelie the vnitie of will vsed the example of our vnitie with God as though we being by obedience and will in religion onelie vnited to the Sonne and by the Sonne to the Father no proprietie of naturall communion shoulde be geuen by the Sacrament of the flesh and bloode sithen that both by the honour of the Sonne of God geuen to vs and by the Sonne of God carnallie abidng in vs and we being corporallie and inseparablie vnited in him the mysterie of the true and naturall vnitie ys to be declared Thus moch he By these woordes as S. Hilarie improoueth the Arrians saing that Chryst The Sacramentaries ioin with the Arrians in denieng natural vnion be twè Chryst and vs by the bless Sa ys not naturallie in vs so doeth he the Sacramentaries teaching the same And thus maie we see the sinceritie of them who doe maintein the pestilent doctrine of the Arrians And that that was confuted and reprooued as heresie twelue hondreth yeares agon ys nowe with a litle false skouring and colouring solde to the people for trueth The Proclamer hath promised that he wolde subscribe yf we coulde bringe furth but one that by plain woordes coulde teache the trueth of soche articles as he Proclamed Here nowe be two both right auncient and famouse The first saieth that ower flesh ys nourished withe the cuppe He saieth not as the Sacramentarie doeth with the cuppe of the Lorde but he speaketh as the catholique Churche doeth sainge With the cuppe whiche ys the bloode of oure Lorde Neither vseth he the hereticall phrase sainge that our flesh ys nourished with the Sacramentall bread but the phrase of Chrystes Churche sainge that our flesh ys nourished A plain saing for the Procla with the breade whiche ys the bodie of our Lorde calling them by expresse woordes the bodie and bloode of Chryste Ys not this a plain speache The other saieth that as trulie as the Father ys naturallie in the Sonne So trulie ys Chryst naturallie in vs by the receipt of his naturall flesh in the Sacrament Whiche speach ys also so plain that except men will not As God the Father ys naturallie in the Sōne so ys the Sōne by his naturall flesh receaued in the bless Sacr. naturalie in vs. see or will not heare or hearinge will not vnderstand they can not choose but see heare and vnderstand a merueillouse plain trueth Whiche trueth was so euident plain famouse and notoriouse in the time of these Fathers that they might vpon the same grownde and frame strong argumentes against great and famouse heresies as nowe ye perceaue these Fathers to haue doen. To conclude then seinge the one of these Fathers saieth that we be nourished with the flesh of Chryst by the receipt of the same in the blessed Sacrament And the other that by the same receipt Chryst ys naturallie in vs and we naturallie one with him we maie verie well saie with sainct Paule that we are membres of his bodie of his flesh and of his bones THE SIXTETH CHAP. TREACTETH VPON this text of sainct Paule to Hebrues He haue an Aultar c. IN the xiii chapter of S. Paules epistle to the Hebrues we finde this sainge We haue an Aultar of the which yt ys not laufull for them to eate that serue in the tabernacle Whiche saing I finde so expownded that by the Aultar ys vnderstanded the bodie of Chryst in the Sacrament So that the sense of those woordes maie be these We haue the bodie of Chryst in the Sacrament of the whiche yt ys not laufull for anie Iewe resting and abidinge in the lawe of Moyses to eate Isich in leuit li. 1. c. 4. That thus yt ys to be vnderstanded I haue wittnesses but I will not trooble the reader with manie but onelie produce a coople which bothe be grecians And they be Isichius and Theophilact the one of the higher house and the other of the lower Isichius saieth thus expownding a text of Leuitic Omnem sanguinem reliquum Vituli fundi circa basim altaris holocausti quod est in tabernaculo testimonii praecepit Altare holocaustomatis rursus Christi corpus intelligamus Sicut enim ipse Sacerdos sacrificium est sic altare est Quia autem intelligibile altare corpus Domini beatus Paulus intelligit ipso dicente cognosce Ait enim habemus Altare de quo edere non habent potestatem qui tabernaculo deseruiunt corpus videlicet Christi dicens De illo enim comedere Iudaeis fas non est He comaunded all the rest The aultar of the which the Jewes maie not eatc ys the bodie of Chryst of the blood of the calfe to be powred oute aboute the foote of the Aultar of the burnt sacrifice which ys in the Tabernacle of wittnesse Let vs again vnderstande the Aultar of the burnt Sacrifice to be the bodie of Chryste For as he ys the preist and the Sacrifice so ys he the Aultar also That sainct Paule also doeth vnderstand the intelligle Aultar the bodie of Chryst know by his owne saing For he saieth We haue an Aultar of the which yt ys not lauful for them to eate that doe serue in the Tabernacle that ys to saie the bodie of Chryst sainge that of yt yt ys not laufull for the Iewes to eate Thus moche Isichius I nede not here moch to saie to open the place for yt ys open enough of yt self and can not well be wrested but that in the literall sense yt must be Hoopers glose edere 1. credere vnderstanded of the
34. item lib. 3. cap. 33 Chryste commaunded himself to be offred lib. 3. cap. 16 Chryste offred euerie wher ys but one bodie and sacrifice lib. 2. cap. 10 Chryste gaue his owne bodie to his Apostles cap. 50. 64. he geueth himself to be eaten in the Sacrament lib. 1. cap. 14. Chrystes woordes This ys my bodie be not figuratiue lib. 2. cap. 42. 43. 44. sequent Chryste verīe bodie in the blessed Sacrament not the figure onelie lib. 1. cap. 21. item lib. 2. cap. 7. item lib. 3. cap. 7. 59. Chryste geueth vs the same flesh by whiche he was ioined to vs or tooke of our nature lib. 1. cap. 14. item lib. 2. cap. 5 Chryste ys ioined to vs corporallie lib. 1. cap. 14. Chryste and the Paschall lambe compared lib. 1. cap. 15. Chryst in our passouer verilie perfectlie lib. 1. cap. 16. 19. in the Iewes passouer vnper fectlie cap. 17 Chryste yf he be receaued but spirituallie then ys our passouer all one with the Iewes passouer cap. 19 Chryste first eate and dranke his bodie and blood and then gaue to his Apostles and whie lib. 1. cap. 16. item lib. 2. cap. 55. Chryste gaue inconsumptible meat tho Sacramentaries consumptible meat li. 1. cap. 17. Chryste consecrated his owne bodie lib. 3. cap. 51. and commaundeth the same to be consecrated li. 1. ca. 20. the preist consecrateth Chryste and not the pope made the Sacra-Chrysts bodie ibid. ca. 18 Chryste did three notable things in the institution of the blessed Sacrament lib. 3 cap. 16. Chryste commended to vs his bodie and blood 24 Chryste in the lawe presented in figure represented in the Gospell in veritie lib. 1. cap. 18 Chryste ys nowe receaued in veritie li. 3. ca. 5. 59. Chrystes verie bodie set before vs in earth lib 1. ca. 18. Chryste the onelie begotten Sonne of God receaued in the blessed Sacrament ibid. lib. 3. ca. 25 Chryste verilie vpon the aultar lib. 1. cap. 18. Chryste geueth his owne blood in the cuppe lib. 2. cap. 61 Chryste turned the bread into his bodie and the wine into his blood lib. 1. cap. 20. he made the bread his bodie lib. 2. cap. 49. Chryste saing this ys my bodie with the woorde made the thing cap. 55 Chryste not man doth consecrate lib. cap. 20. 31 Chrystes woordes this do ye be referred to the substance not to the maner lib. 1. cap. 27 Chrystes maner in ministring hath no cōmaundement ca. 26. neuer synce vsed ibid. Chryste left the maner of ministracion to be ordered of his Apostles cap. 26. lib. 3. cap. 34. Chryste in his supper bare himself in his hands lib. 2. cap. 10. 54 Chryste geueth his flesh in substance verilie not in maner grosselie ca. 36 Chryste in his supper the geuer and the gifte ca. 47. 53 Chryste the meat that we all feed on lib. 3 cap. 6. Chryste ys the substance of the blessed Sacrament cap. 10 Chrystes bodie as verilie receaued in the Sacrament as yt ys beleued to haue hanged on the crosse ibid. Chrystes blood in the Sacrament shed vpon the soldiours garments lib. 1. cap. 24 Chrystes bodie receaued with mouth both of bodie and soule li. 1. cap. 20. li. 2. ca. 14. 25. Chrystes flesh ys not disgested as other meates lib. 1. cap. 14. yt turneth vs into yt li. 2. ca. 5. lib. 3. ca. 59. Chryst ys not there receaued spirituallie where he ys not beleued that he maie be receaued reallie li. 1. cap. 31. Chryste doth sanctifie and transmute the bread and wine ibid. See bread Chrystes bodie vpon the crosse called bread li. 2. ca. 6 Chryste doth blesse sanctifie and diuide his holie bodie to the receauers lib. 2. cap 8. Chrysts flesh in the Sacrament geueth life to the woorthie receauers li. 2. cap. 6. li. 3. cap. 7. Chryste in all receauers naturallie in good receauers both naturallie and spirituallie lib. 2. cap. 20. 24. 25. lib. 3. cap. 6. Chryste as verilie in the blessed Sacrament as he was verilie incarnated lib. 2. cap. 24. Chryste by his incarnacion ioined to vs we by the Sacrament ioined to him lib. 2. cap. 14. 28. item lib. 3. cap. 27. 59. Chrystes bodie shall raise our bodies lib. 2. cap. 26. Chryste feadeth vs with a bread whiche ys his flesh ca. 32 Chryste moued the Iewes to beleue in his godhead and to eate the flesh of his manhead li. 2. ca. 2 Chryste by the Sacrament maketh vs one with his bodie and among our selues li. 3. cap. 26. Chryste instructed his Apostles in the faith of the blessed Sacrament before he in stituted yt cap. 56 Chryste spake plentifullie of his bodie and bloode in the sixt of Sainct Iohn lib. 2. cap. 55. Chrystes institucion ys to receaue his bodie and bloode in the remembrance of his death li. 3. cap. 36. Chrysts bodie ys not in the Sacramentall bread of the communion cap. 42 Chryste whie he instituted the Sacrament vnder two kindes lib. 2. ca. 67 Chryste being whollie vnder eche kinde the people be not defrauded receauing but th one ibid. Chryste saied Masse li. 3. cap. 33 Chryste taught the newe sacrifice of the newe Testament lib. 1. cap. 34. 37. item lib. 2. ca. 56. 58. Chryst ment a sacrifice li 1. ca. 31 Chryste must of necessitie be graunted to haue offred sacrifice in his supper ibid. Chryste ceasseth not to excute his perpetuall preisthead and sacrifice cap. 37 Chryste offred euery wher ys but one bodie and one sacrifice li. 2. cap. 10 Chryste both in heauen and earth in veritie ibid. Chrystes being in the Sacrament ys miraculouse contrarie to the rules of philosophie ibid. Chryste bodie vpon the crosse in heauen and on the aultar all one lib. 2. cap. 15. 22. Chryste the Sonue of man howe he was in heauen when he spake in earth lib. 2. cap. 34. Chrysts godhead and manhead distincted as two breades ca. 3. 15. Chryst sitteth in heauen and yet ys dailie sacrificed by the preist ca. 46 Chrystes bodie on the aultar that was in the maunger ca. 45. Chryste why he made mencion of his ascension in the vi of Sainct Iohn cap. 34. 35. Chrystes flesh besides nature ascended into heauen and besides nature geueth life in the blessed Sacrament ca. 34. Chrystes woordes wrested to xvi diuerse senses by protestants ca. 41 Chryste was the spirituall rocke not the materiall and therfor ys ther no figure in Sainct Paules speache lib. 3. cap. 3 Chryste before the consecracion of his bodie lift vppe his eies and gaue thankes to his Father li. 3. ca. 34 Chryste tooke the cuppe of wine mixed with water into his handes and blessed and sanctified them cap. 35 Chrysts blood not onelie in heauen but also in the chalice ca. 25 Chryste entred in to his Apostles the doores being shett li. 2. ca. 11 Chryste shall come to iudgement with the sign of the crosse and prints of his woundes li. 3. ca 45. Chryste howe he ys hath ben and shall be a