the Popish iniquity have thought it their best Policy to be silent concerning it since that time But my Author will go higher than so aâ—d shake the Authority of the Hebrew and Greek Copies that are extant in the world And well might he contend with the London Ministers as his friends boasted he should if he could prove the word that they preached to be uncertain and their Greek Testaments supposititious Books but though he cannot prove them to be so yet he will give men occasion to suspect them for such witness his Speech aforementioned possibly he might remember the Counsel of the Poet Horatius Si vis esse aliquis facinus aliquod Audeas egregium c. i.e. If thou wouldst be a man of Fame Thou must do something of great name Other Considerations to prove the Purity of the Original Copies of Scripture And now Reader That thy heart may be throughly antidoted against Mr. R's most pestilent suggestion I shall offer thee these following Considerations 1. That Books of another nature are seldom questioned after this manner when did you hear any man making any doubt whether the Books of Plato of Aristotle Hippocrates and of Pliny and Galen Plutarch of Theophrastus and Cicero of Homer and Hesiod of Suetonius and Florus Tacitus and Livy were the writings of those men whose names they bear or whether they are agreeable to those Copies which they wrote at first So that the Writings of Philosophers and Poets Physicians Historians Naturalists Moralists though very ancient shall pass currantly for theirs whose names they go under and are not imagined to be corrupted or altered from what they were at first Mr. R. doth not insinuate any doubt in that case But when it comes to that which concerns our precious Souls that word which contains our rules in Life our comforts at death and our foundations of hope as to a better world hereafter O then his patient heart is moved his Doubts and Fears and Suspicions are suggested he kicks and flings and lays about him extreamly he throws his blackest dust in our Faces that we may have no eyes to see nor no reason to apprehend that those Copies of the Bible which we have among us are the same in sense and substance with them that the Pen-men of Scripture wrote And all because we have not those Original Copies to shew as we have not of the other for he cannot shew us any of Plato's c. hand-hand-writing Is it not manifestly the work of the Devil to cast doubts in mens minds about the one while he raiseth no doubts about the other It seems he can be content to have us believe that other Books are what they pretend to be but he is not so willing that we should believe the same of God's Book and no wonder for he knoweth the belief of that will be more likely to do us good than the belief of the other Argu. 2 2. If the Scripture were corrupted in the Originals it must be by such as believed it to be the word of God or such as did not If he say by them that believed it so to be then I would fain know how those that had so much Religion as to believe it should at the same time have so much profaneness as to go about to corrupt the Copies of it Would not the heart of the wickedest man fail him when he was about such a horrid design if he had but the least thought that it was the Word of his Maker that he set himself to corrupt If he say it was corrupted by those that did not believe it to be the Word of God but looked upon it as a piece of deceit and a politick innovation to keep fools in awe then why should they trouble themselves to corrupt it doubtless they would think it were corrupt enough already and would not much envy the holy Christians any of those delights and comforts which they had in it or from it And if they should ever have undertaken such a work it being that which would require much time and pains to do it to any purpose it must be supposed that they must have had some considerable motives from credit or profit of which no rational account I dare say can ever be given Nor can it be proved that ever any such thing was designed by the enemies of Christian Religion Julian the Apostate Emperor Acerrimus ille Christi hostis as an excellent Author styles him * Zanchius in Tom. 8. Orat. 1. He I say is well known to have been as fit a man to manage such a work as most ever was in the world for he had wit and learning in abundance he had also great power without him and an impenitent hardned heart within him and employed all his power and policy to the ruine not only of Christians but Christianity and accordingly he proceeded in mischiefs by Banishments and Imprisonments fire and Sword and by pulling down Churches and by putting down all Schools of Learning the two latter of which some that go for Christians among us could have wished him good success in yet I have not found that ever he did any such thing as this we are speaking of or that he employed any others about it to corrupt the Copies of Scripture that were in the hands of Christians or to counterfeit it by any other writing He was crafty enough to take other courses against Christianity that were easier to be followed And if any such thing were done how soon would it be discovered If a Protestant should Print some Mass-Books with some considerable alterations leaving out a prayer to the Virgin Mary and putting in a Prayer to Christ instead of it how quickly would the Romanists espy the change how soon would the Bulls roar from Babylon * Revel 17.5.9.18 How many Declarations Manifesto's and Testimonies would be published speedily in the world to prevent the intended mischief and to assure all that were concerned that those Books were not Authentick or Catholick or allowed under the Hands of the Pope's Holiness And do ye think that the Christians in the Primitive times were not as zealous for the Scriptures as the Papist's are for the Mass-Books or that they would not have been as careful to discover such forgeries in or about them if any such things had been A 3d. Argument for the Purity of Scripture c. 3. If the Scripture were counterfeited or the Original Copies corrupted by any it must be by blockish and ignorant Persons or by Men of considerable Wit and Learning The former would not undertake such a work or if they should they could not manage it and carry it on Nor may we well imagine the latter for certainly Men of wit in any tolerable sense could not but apprehend the difficulty of such a work the Copies being dispersed among Christians that valued them more than all the wealth of the World and would be as careful to preserve
in the Grek to give vengeance to those that know not God and that obey not the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. And can he be said to give vengeance to them when he takes away their very Beings and so maketh them uncapable of receiving any punishment at all Surely not The lawful Magistrate under Christ is appointed to act the part of a Revenger upon them that do evil * Rom. 13.4 And that vengeance which according to God's Ordinance he inflicts upon Malefactors is commonly such as they are very sensible of And shall not ungodly sinners feel their punishment to the purpose as we say when the Supream Law-giver shall set himself purposely to execute wrath and render vengeance to them yea doubtless they shall For when He will execute vengeance upon them Ezek. 25.17 they shall then know that He is the Lord as the Prophet speaks But 't is plain they could not do so if his vengeance did consist in taking away their Being that which is not cannot know any thing 2. Destruction is not used in Scripture in reference to Men to signifie any such thing as the Total abolishment of their Natures Let any of my Author's Opinion disprove this by any Text whatsoever Indeed 't is said of the old World that the Flood came Matth. 24.39 and took them all away but 't is omnes only not totos it took away All those Persons viz. out of the Land of the Living But it did not take away the whole Natures Their Souls are living still And God will be so far from destroying the Souls of the wicked as to their Nature and Being as that he will quicken and raise their Bodies which Death and Worms had destroyed formerly Acts 24.15 There shall be a Resurrection of the just and the unjust saith St. Paul in the Acts. And they shall be raised for good and all as we say so as to see corruption no more for ever 1 Cor. 15.52 3. That to destroy signifies in respect of the wicked a state of real Misery and Torment as when it is said Matth. 10.28 that God is able to destroy Body and Soul in Hell that is to fill them with perfect Misery And if it were meant of destroying their Beings then that dreadful word Hell which is added as an aggravation of the destruction would signifie just nothing in point of Terror for if a Man be turned into nothing it is all one whether it be in the one or the other for nothing is no nearer to something in Heaven than in Hell And thus also the word is used very often in our own Language As when we say of Oppressors that they have destroyed whole Families we do not mean that they have turned them into nothing but that they have brought them into a calamitous condition And this I hope may be enough for that Text and I think it is not too much A third place I shall offer Matth. 25.41 urged for it to prove the everlastingness of the Punishment of the wicked is Matth. 25.41 He shall say unto them on his left hand Depart from me ye cursed into everlasting fire prepared for the Devil and his Angels 1. They must depart viz. really by changing place as Christ is departed or gone into Heaven in 1 Pet. 3. 1 Pet. 3. ult last vers where it is the same Greek Verb that is used in both places 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so supposeth the continuance of their Being 2. They must depart not into Nothing or such a state if I might so call it as the World was in before its Creation but into Fire 3. And this Fire of what sort soever it be God knoweth is an everlasting Fire in the same sense as the Life and Happiness of the Righteous is everlasting Life in 46. verse yea it is that everlasting Fire which the Devils shall be for everlasting punished with v. 41. as in the Text it self and therefore certainly is everlasting in the saddest sense or without end And if any Man shall say they may be cast into this everlasting Fire but not suffer everlastingly in it he had need have no less than Mr. Richardson's Learning to enable him to give a good Account of his speech And he that can conceive any such thing as probable may by the same degree of acuteness perswade himself 2 Pet. 1.11 that the Saints may go into the everlasting kingdom of Christ and yet possibly not dwell everlastingly in it which yet they will hardly question in the least measure while they have so many faithful promises of a Happy Eternity * 1 Thess 4.17 Rev. 22.5 c. A fourth Text of Scripture which may conveniently be urged for the everlastingness of the punishment of the wicked is Daniel 12.2 Daniel 12.2 urged and opened Many that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake some to everlasting life and some to shame and everlasting contempt But before I come to speak of that which most directly concerns my present purpose Many how understood it will not be amiss to explain the word many for some have gathered from thence that there shall be no general Resurrection The weakness of which Opinion to speak no worse of it I might shew from a great many places These two for brevity sake I shall content my self with Jo. 5.28 29. The hour is coming wherein All that are in the Grave shall hear his Voice Jo. 5.29 and come forth c. So then there are none excepted And in the 24. chap. of the Acts it was the Apostles belief Acts 24.15 That there shall be a Resurrection of the just and the unjust that is of all and every one of them for if the just there do mean All the just the unjust must mean All the unjust for the phrase is alike of both of them so that he that grants the one may not deny the other And therefore that Text in Daniel cannot tend to strengthen that Opinion which that we may the better perceive these three things may be considered 1. That the Multi ex dormientibus many of them that sleep vid. Synops crit in loc is in substance the same as if it were said Multi dormientes i. e. Those many that are sleeping in the Dust of the Earth And then it will be no less than if it were said All of them 2. That the Proposition is particular only and therefore will not warrant a Universal Negative to be inferred from it Many Saints or Multitudes of Saints shall be caught up together to meet the Lord Jesus 1 Thess 4.17 at his coming to Judgment is a Truth Yet we cannot truly conclude that All shall not Doubtless their Lord will receive them all as well as any And St. Paul makes no difference between himself and the rest of the faithful in respect of that priviledge 3. Many sometimes put for All. By
aforesaid in his Comment on the Epistle to the Colossians Now when he saith If all Men are in God all Men are in Christ I grant it in the sense aforesaid All men are by Christ for he upholdeth all things by the Word of his Power And to the last passage Heb. 1.3 'T is commonly confessed that All who are in Christ shall be saved To this I say my Return is thus That if he mean All who are Members of Christ's Mystical Body or that have an Interest in Christ's Merits and Righteousness as it is meant in Rom. 8. v. 1. Then I grant that All who are in Christ shall be saved which that very Text demonstrateth But I utterly deny that All men are in Christ in this sense of the word But if he mean All that are by Christ made and maintained in the World by him then I deny that All such shall be saved for in this sense the Devils may be said to be in Christ Colos 1.16 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And thus Mr. R.'s rich Invention is proved to be worth nothing but scorn and contempt R. In Rom. 5. The second Adam in saving p. 178. is put in opposition to the first Adam in sinning And if All Nations shall be blessed as was foretold in Gen. 22. Every particular must also for the general word All includes every particular And it is a great lessening of the riches and fulness of God's grace and goodness to say that God hath made this World for All and the best World but for a few B. That which he would have us gather from Rom. 5. is manifestly thus That as all Mankind are liable to destruction by means of the first Adam so all shall be freed from it by the merit of the second Adam Jesus Christ But I cannot think how he will find any Text in it Rom. 5.18 cleared that may be made very serviceable for such a design unless it be the 18. Verse of that Chapter As by the offence of one judgment came upon all Men to condemnation so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all Men to justification of life But this will easily be answered For the comparison there made between Adam and Christ is not in respect of the Number of Persons that are saved or destroyed but in respect of the causes of Salvation and Damnation That as the cause of Damnation even sin is originally only from Adam so the cause of Salvation even Righteousness and Justification is wholly from Christ As all sinners became sinners through the first Adam and so are liable to damnation through him so all justified Persons are justified through Christ the second Adam and have a right to Heaven only through his Righteousness imputed to them So that when Paul saith by the Righteousness of one the free gift came upon all Men to justification of life it is not so to be taken as if Justification were common to All men but that it is through the Righteousness of Christ that All who are justified are justified viz. that none are justified otherwise As the Psalmist saith the Lord upholdeth all that fall Psal 145.14 not that he upholdeth every one that falls for some fall irrecoverably as Judas Pharaoh the Sinners against the Holy Ghost c. but that All who being fallen are upheld and preserved from falling away utterly are so upheld only by him Hanc Deo tribuit gloriam quod sine ejus ope nemo sustentetur Musculus in Psal 145. as a worthy Expositor on the place This glory saith he the Psalmist ascribes to God viz. That without his help none are upheld Rom. 8.30 Whom he justified them he also glorified but God doth not glorifie them that live and dye unconverted for Except ye be converted Matth. 18.3 ye shall not enter into the Kingdom of Heaven Matth. 18.3 Therefore neither doth he justifie any such Persons Nor is he more fortunate in alledging Gen. 22.18 for though All in it self be inclusive of every particular Genes 22.18 opened yet in that place all Nations cannot signifie all particular Persons of every Nation for if all Nations should be blessed in this largest sense none should be cursed as our Lord will say unto many at the last Day Matth. 25.41 Depart from me ye cursed Wherefore by all Nations understand some of all Nations or if you will many of all Nations even all true believers in every Nation And that the word all Nations doth not always mean all men in general Esay 2.2 is plain by Esay 2.2 where it is said that All Nations should flow to the Mountain of the Lord's house which cannot be said of all in general and is expressed by many in the 4. of Micah 1. Vers And as for the fulness and riches of God's goodness it is not to be judged of by the number of them that are saved by it The goodness of God how to be judged of but rather by the way and manner wherein and whereby they are saved and by that great Salvation which his People shall partake of Briefly thus The riches of God's grace and goodness is seen in the excellency of its effect For Life is a more excellent thing than Death and Righteousness than Sin and secondly in the powerfulness of the work for it argueth a greater power to save than to destroy to justifie than to condemn as 't is a greater matter to reform a few than to corrupt and harden a great many against the holy Ordinances and ways of God An Idle Hypocrite is too well able to do the one but a painful Minister is scarce able to do the other And by the way we do not say as Mr. R. that God hath made the best World or Heaven but for a very few For many shall come from the East and the West and sit down with Abraham Isaac and Jacob in the Kingdom of Heaven yet they are few in comparison of them that miss of Heaven Matth. 7.14 as was seen before from the words of him whom he dares not I hope contradict or cavil at And if a Man can think it is an obscuring of God's goodness to say that he hath not made Heaven for so many as he hath made the Earth for he may think it much more a denying of his goodness to say that he hath made comfortable provisions for the Birds and Beasts and at the same time reserved many thousands of mighty Angels for extream and everlasting punishment Yet so it is whether my Author allow of it or not he that spares the one did not spare the other He that prepares Food for these in this world hath prepared everlasting fire for those in another world Yet if a man do hence object and cavil against God's goodness 't is a sign he hath little goodness himself See 2 Pet. 2. Judes Epist Matth. 25.41 and as little wit but he goes on R. Shall we