are far from Righteousness None need the Physician but they that are Sick neither doth Christ invite any to come unto him but such as are heavy laden Come unto me saith he all ye that labour and are heavy laden and I will give you rest But what is coming to Christ but believing in him according to the saying of Augustin Therefore as Christ rejects none that come unto him that is such as return to him by believing but revives and justifies them so faith in Christ in which only our Salvation consists is no where of a saving efficacy but only in those whom it finds burdened and afflicted Another Objection If Faith only were sufficient to Iustification it would follow that good Works are not necessary But the Consequent is false And Therefore the Antecedent also is false That Faith ony is sufficient Vega confirms the Minor with this Argument Unless good Works had been necessary in all respects Paul had not so carefully given Instructions about Vertue and rebuked Vice and so mightily commended good Manners and Integrity of Life but we shall afterwards enquire into the Minor I come now to the Argument And First I deny the Major for this is not a necessary Consequence Salvation is obtained by Faith in Christ only Therefore good Works are not necessary The necessity of Vertue and honest discipline is and always hath been very great in all respects both private and publick yet this necessity doth not at all detract from the peculiar dignity of Faith that it should not be the only cause of Iustification as on the other side the Iustification of Faith doth not take away the necessity nor lessen the care of a Godly Life Therefore both Faith in Christ and the practice of Holiness are necessary the one to justifie Sinners in the sight of God and the other to exercise them that are justified in this World Therefore There is need of a distinction in this case for according to Philosophy a thing is said to be necessary two manner of ways First Absolutely and simply when one thing is so necessary to another that it cannot be done or consist without it Secondly In respect of Consequence when a thing is of such a Nature that as soon as it begins to be other things also are joyned with it or at least soon follow after and thus good works in persons justified are necessary to Salvation not simply but in regard of Consequence By what I have said any Reader that is not void of Sense may easily discern that we seek not to banish good Works out of the World that they should not be necessary but we only remove them from being a cause of Iustifying That so both Faith and Works may be put each of them in their own place and contained within their own bounds For Paul did not in vain nor without great necessity exhort with much vehemency to the Godly practice of a Christian Life For what is more glorious in it self or more worthy of the profession of Christianity or fitter to adorn the Doctrine of the Gospel than that those who are called by the Name of Christ should resemble him exactly in their manners and the practice of their lives And as they profess themselves to be Citizens of the Heavenly Kingdom they should according to their power endeavour to lead a Life like Heaven upon Earth On the contrary what is more abominable or odius than if those who have been engaged by so many benefits exalted to so great dignity and are joyned to him into so near an union by so many Covenants and Obligations if yet they do not follow his Foot-steps nor imitate him in the practice of their lives Therefore in this we and they agree that Works of Piety are very necessary but we must consider wherein this necessity lies For they are effects which of necessity depend upon their cause from whence they proceed but the cause hath no dependance upon them by any necessity By the like Consequence we call many things necessary in common Offices of Civility and Humanity as when Kindnesses are received what is more necessary and according to Iustice than a thankful remembrance of a Favour received and a readiness of Mind to give evidence of thankfulness not only in Words but also by repaying Kindness with Kindness if there be Opportunity Which thankfulness was nevertheless no cause of the Kindness that was done Let us here compare other kinds of Offices Who knows not that a Son and Heir ought of necessity to be dutiful to his Father But again who can be ignorant that this is no cause in him why he should receive the Inheritance The same also may be observed in Marriage where the Wife being tyed to her own Husband of necessity owes Subjection to him which nevertheless she shews to him not so much for any Law of necessity that extorts it as of her own accord and willingly being provoked by a Principle of Love moreover when she shews him the greatest Subjection this necessity is no cause of the Marriage bond Iust so it is in the performance of Godly Works which Paul commands us to maintain for necessary uses not that necessity of Works is any cause of Iustification but because it cannot otherways be but that where true Faith is there of necessity good Works are required and yet they are not so much required as they are a necessary Consequence for who was ever endued with the true Knowledge of Christ the Son of God or had the secret breathings of his Spirit or had a lively sense of his unsearchable Power and the unspeakable Glory of his Majesty but is drawn after him with the Cords of Love and cleaves unto him with all his Heart setting light by all the Vanities of this World Moreover who hath a true savour of Christ but he dispises the World and all the things of the World as the dirt under his Feet So that now there is no need of any Law to exact Works of Righteousness of him who is truly planted in Christ because he is a Law to himself and does more of his own accord than can be commanded by any Compulsion An Argument of the Iesuites The Word only is not found in the Holy Scripture therefore Faith only doth not justifie Though it is not true that this exclusive Word is no where found in the Holy Scriptures yet suppose we should grant it to be true what would be the Consequence Verily those things that follow from a necessary Consequence though they are not expressed yet they are implied And therefore ye also your selves admit many Words into your Confession of Faith of which the Scripture makes no mention But let us proceed you say this Exclusive Word is not found in Canonical Scripture I confess it is not in so many Letters and Syllables But seeing we meet with so many other things in sacred Writings that exclude all these Accessory
them that are justified but these things have no union with Faith in the concernment of Iustification And first as touching Repentance abundance hath been said before for seeing Repentance is nothing but a mourning for sins committed it may indeed of it self afflict the guilty person and fit him for receiving of Grace but it cannot obtain a pardon for the sins committed before a Secular Iudge and much less before the Iudgment Seat of God For that is the Office of Faith which as it only obtains a pardon so it obtains it for none but them that are afflicted and repent and believe in Christ. For for their sakes chiefly Christ was sent by his Father into this World that he may help all them that being in distress flie to him by Faith In which three things are to be considered and placed each of them in their own bounds and territories First that we may see what the Mediatour does what Faith performs what sorrow for sin produces All our Salvation flows from the Mediatour as from a Spring and Fountain But if you ask how or for what cause he saves I answer by Faith And if you ask whom he saves I answer those that repent of their wickedness or whom he draws unto himself by an inward Call Doth the Lord then save those for their Repentance No verily Suppose a man is greatly grieved at the remembrance of his by-past life but yet comes not to Christ will grief for his sins save him No surely Yea who can come to Christ unless he first hear and understand who he is from whom Salvation must be sought Now it is Faith and not Repentance that does this For it is not the grief and sorrow of a broken hearted sinner but Faith that discovers a Saviour to us and guides us to him and obtains Salvation from him Yea which is Salvation to them that are in distress for thus it is written This is the will of God That every one that seeth and believeth in him should have Eternal Life By which it is evident enough what should be attributed unto Repentance and what to Faith in the case of Iustification for sin is not therefore pardoned because he that sinned hath repented but because he that sinned not at all hath died for sin therefore the sinner is forgiven not for his Repentance but for Faith whereby he believes in him that died for our sins rose again for our Iustification Where Faith is joyned with Works and where it is not joyned AND hitherto we have been speaking of Repentance But as touching the Reformation of the Life in other respects though I know that nothing is more convenient than that Faith which is rightly instructed in Christ should have Charity and other Offices of Piety suitable to the Christian Profession joyned with it Yet it must be considered what manner of Union this is and of how large an extent for Faith and Charity have that wherein they are of necessity united And they have that also wherein they must of necessity be separated Where we deal with God about Salvation Iustification and the Expiation of sins here Faith only without Works is powerful and overcomes But in dealings with men in the Lives of the Iustified in popular duties in the exercise of Vertue there is a very near Union between Faith and Vertue of which the one cannot consist without the other Therefore these things should be measured by their own bounds that we may attribute unto Faith its due and to Works their due and unto both that which is meet For as that poisonous Errour of Eunomius should be abhorred who is reported to have been so great an Enemy to godly works that he thought it was not a matter of any concernment how any man led his life So also great care should be taken lest in shunning the Soylla of Eunomius we fall upon the other Carybdis of the Papists which is no less pernicious being mis-led by the Popish Doctors who make such a confused Union between Faith and Works that neither Faith without Works nor Works without Faith procure Iustification But this Union is easily confuted by the Authority of Scripture For if Faith only doth not bring Believers into a state of Salvation unless it be joyned with great Holiness of life why did not Christ joyn these together when he said simply He that believeth in me hath Eternal Life Why did not Peter joyn them together when according to the Testimonies of the Prophets he proclaimed remission of sins to all that believed in his Name Why did not Paul joyn them together when instructing the Iaylor in the Faith he said unto him Believe in the Lord Iesus and thou shalt be saved and thy house Many other such like things may be mentioned The History of the Galatians is well known who being led aside by the false Apostles did not wholly cast off Christ nor excluded Faith in Christ but they would have had the good Works of Believers joyned with Faith in the Article of Iustification before God unto Eternal Life for which cause how angry the Apostle was at them his Epistle bears witness But here again a place of St. Paul out of the same Epistle is objected where writing to the Galatians he speaks of Faith that works by Charity From hence the Tridentine Divines infer a necessary connexion between Faith and Charity so that Faith without Charity like matter without form avails nothing to the perfection of Righteousness And they say of Charity which they call Righteousness inherent in us That it is so impossible that it should be separated from Faith in the concernment of Iustification that they assert it only to be the formal cause of our Iustification But it is not difficult to answer to this place of Paul For in that Epistle the Apostle endeavours with great diligence to call back his Galatians to the Righteousness of Faith from which they had swerved In the mean while lest they should be seduced by a counterfeit Faith by these words he intimates what Faith it is that he speaks of Not such a Faith as is idle and dead without Works but which worketh by Love And in this sense we deny not that Faith is not alone But what consequence is that Lively Faith is not alone without Charity It is a lively Faith that justifies Therefore in Iustifying Faith is not alone without Charity This Argument is disproved in the Schools of Logicians for it is a Sophism a non causa ut causa Therefore I answer to the Major The Faith that is lively is not alone without Charity That is true in working but not in justifying Therefore as touching the Cause and Office of Iustifying this is not the consequence thereof Therefore in Iustifying Faith is not alone without Charity But as for the the Minor though Faith that justifies is called lively in respect of good Works yet it doth not justifie in respect
contained in the Law of God So that besides this there is no other way laid open neither in the Gospel nor the Writings of the Apostles whereby we may be brought to the Heavenly Countrey and its immortality but that which is described only in the Law of God Suppose these things were granted you which you affirm though they be in themselves absurd and wholly Iudaical but let me grant or at least feign that this way which you shew is the only way and the most firmly founded and also that the same is the most easie and likewise that there is no other way by which we can come to Heaven but that only which is proposed by the description of the Divine Law Suppose we grant this yet in the mean while see thou teach me this how thou canst know that thou dost as many good works as are sufficient for a compleat obedience to the Law Of old our first Father Adam received but one command and failed in the performance and that in Paradise being placed in the highest degree of Innocency What and thou a miserable mortal man banished out of Paradise compassed about with so much infirmity of the flesh having received the Law of God in which so many and so great things are imposed to be performed and they are so imposed that he is liable to a Curse whosoever doth not most constantly continue in them all do'st thou stand so firmly that no storm of temptation can throw thee down at any time But what if having observed all other commands of God exactly so much as one tittle of the Law is neglected by thee What will thy Righteousness say to us in this Case Do you not see that the Sentence of the Law being pronounced you are as much in the fault as if you were guilty of all 〈◊〉 And yet you talk to us of no other way to the Kingdom of Life but that which is defined by the Ministry of the Law and the Exercise of Charity But now how will you teach that by what Scriptures by what Masters shall this appear evident to us which you assert by Paul I trow What then says he he To wit this is the mind and opinion of Paul say you that he asserts that all manner of destroying and suppressing of Lust is placed in the Grace of God which must be obtained by Faith and teaches that there is no other way of extinguishing and destroying it And a gain elsewhere Paul was never the Man that disapproved the Offices of Bounty as if they were little profitable for Salvation but taught that the only right way to Heaven was that which was Fixed in the continual Exercise of Charity c. I know indeed and confess that all proceeds from the Grace of God alone whatsoever is done by us aright and commendably whether in suppressing the Allurements of Vices or in observing the Discipline of Vertue Moreover that should not be denied which you do well assume according to the mind of Paul that we obtain this Grace from God by Faith Likewise that is not ill said which you add concerning Paul that he was never the Man that disapproved Pious endeavours of Exercising Charity seeing he every where extols those very things with wonderful praises For who knows not that the excellent Sermons of Paul are exceeding full of very serious Precepts and Instructions for governing the Life and that they are not in any matter more affectionate than in this that all every where who profess the name of Christ should together with a sincere profession of Faith joyn a proportionable Holiness of Life 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for necessary uses Suppose this to be most true as it is indeed yet that was never the meaning of the Apostle to place our Salvation principally in the Law as if he thought that the Kindom of God and the Righteousness thereof should be measured by our worthy Deeds and Charity or proposed Heaven to us as fit to be paid for or sold for the commodities of our Works as by a kind of Auction Yea when I read Paul's Epistles of a far different sense this seems to me to be the only scope and mind of the Apostle that he transfers all this Righteousness which you attribute to the Law unto Faith and so transfers it that he shuts out all mixture of Works and leaves only Faith in the Son of God which lays open for us a way into the Kingdom of Heaven For I beseech you he that affirms that we are justified by Faith without Works and who again says but now without the Law the Righteousness of God is made manifest being testified by the Law and the Prophets with what Words could he more evidently shut out the endeavours and merits of all our Vertues from the Divine gift of Iustification These things being thus agreed upon and concluded by the weighty authority of Paul of necessity from thence follows That there is a twofold manner or way of being righteous to be distinguished as I said according to the different conditions of both Covenants of which the one belongs to the Law the other is peculiar to Christ. Then both the Law and Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 have their own righteousness for as the Law which is wholly exercised in works of righteousness endures no unrighteousness and renders the fruits of righteousness plentifully to those who persevering in that which is good have filled up all the parts of perfect Innocency Likewise Christ also hath his own righteousness both much more powerful and also not a little differing from the other though not so much differing in respect of the matter yet exceeding much in the manner of dispensing for the Law communicates only to them that Work but Christ communicates to them that believe perfect righteousness and often also to the unworthy and underserving by a singular grace of dispensation Therefore this Righteousness is properly called the Righteousness of Faith Which is necessarily to be distinguished by us from the other which is called the Righteousness of the Law Which they who do not verily they do a great injury to the Scriptures and quench all light of Doctrine confounding both their own Consciences and the Consciences of their hearers with a wonderful kind of disturbance so that scarcely any Man can certainly know what should be hoped or feared for they who dispute thus concerning the Righteousness of the Law and draw all things to that alone as if there remained no other way to hope for Salvation but that which the strict and severe observation of the Law brings I beseech you what else do those Men do but leave the Souls of Men in a doubtful wavering And by what way those Men encourage us to hope by the same they compel us to fear and utterly to despair of Salvation seeing there is no Man in the World to whom the daily offences of his Life gives not
if they are righteous and not sinners whom Christ helps What need have the Righteous of a Redeemer What need have the whole of a Physician Moreover how will that saying of Paul hold true whereby Christ being made Man is said to have come into the World not to save the Righteous but Sinners I beseech you now O ingenuous Man according to your Modesty that I may deal very modestly with you If any Man treat with you on this manner in disputing about the Doctrine of Iustification what would you answer him if he should ask these things of you If any such Man should come to you who being affrighted in his mind and astonished at the greatness of his sins and burdened with horrour of Conscience and almost dead with the fear of the Iudgment of God should ask the help of counsel and comfort from you of which sort there are found not a few Examples in the Folds of the Lord's Flock what Remedy would you reach forth unto him Perhaps you will send him to those Books of yours concerning Righteousness and what will he find there whereby his afflicted and cast down Mind may be refreshed and recover it self what will you send him to the Law but what will he draw from thence fit for healing his wounds especially seeing that Law of Righteousness can only bring us in guilty because we have not kept the Law and oblige us thereunto as by bond at least it cannot by any means restore Righteousness that was once lost or satisfie the Iudge It remains then that you should bring over the miserable Soul of a Sinner from the Law in which there appears no hope of defence unto Christ seeing it is He only by whose Wounds and Stripes we are healed and who hath taken upon himself all the Impieties of us all that he might communicate unto us his own Righteousness That is very true indeed and upon that account I think you and yours are to be commended who though you seem not to have a clear enough sight of the genuine Office of Christ and his Divine Greatness in procuring our Salvation yet ye refuse not to profess his Name and a certain external reverence of Faith But because at present you have to do with men that are troubled and to whom it is not sufficient to retain only the Name of a Saviour unless we have also a right understanding of the Efficacy of his Death which he suffered for us and of the Power that he hath to save and the great benefits he hath bestowed upon us and his exceeding great Love and Good-will towards us and the infinite Riches that are promised to us in him Therefore you must proceed further and help the afflicted Minds of the Godly as much as may be that they may know and believe not only that there is eternal and durable Life in Christ but also that they may be taught the way and means and manner how that Life comes to us and to whom it belongs and what we must observe in attaining unto it What the power and efficacy of Faith is whom it justifies and how IN which matter there is great variety of Sentiments and Opinions amongst Divines For whereas Paul proclaims with a very audible Voice That Man is justified by Faith without the Works of the Law Those Men by the additions of their Comments do not explain the most evident meaning of the Apostle but render it obscure they do not expound but cavil So that some take the word Faith not as Paul for that Faith only which is in Christ Iesus but which is formed by Charity and Works Others interpret that which Paul saith of Faith without Works to be understood concerning Ceremonial Works Some interpret it of the Works of the Law in this sense that those works are undertaken not by Faith but by the command of the Law without Grace Others expound it otherwise without antecedent works only Some think it should be understood of the first Iustification only which they attribute to Faith alone as in little Children that are Baptized but the second in men come to years they attribute to Faith indeed but not without Works The scope of all which dispute is that Faith being adorned with Works may do something and on the contrary that if Works are not joyned with it it may seem a kind of rude matter void of life and form not only unprofitable to purchase Righteousnes but a certain dead and destructive thing Which if it be true I would know this of them and chiefly I would ask of you Osorius in what Common-wealth in what Church in whose Kingdom do you coyn this new piece of Divinity If it is the Church of Christ that is not yours It is his Kingdom in which you are only a servant What Shall not Christ have a free power permitted to him of administring his own affairs as in his own lawful Common-wealth And whence is this your great boldness in anothers Dominion in a Church that ye never founded to alter and change as you list the appointments and institutions of your Prince contrary to Law and Right Or by what authority do you oppose your selves but that every man may act in his own possession according to his own right and freedom of command What if it seems good in the Eyes of Christ to communicate freely the glory of his Kingdom to whom he will Will ye forbid him What if the most Gracious Lord will pay a full reward to those that come to work at the last hour of the day and make all equal by making the like agreement with them all should your Eye therefore be evil because he is good But now the Lord himself the Prince and Author of the Church professes in very evident words that eternal life shall be given to them that believe in his name What can be said more evident in signification or more clear to be understood He that believeth in me saith he hath eternal life And again repeating the same in the same words He that believeth in the Son hath everlasting life And chap. 11. He that believeth in me though he were dead yet he shall live And lest he should seem to testifie this of himself without the consent of his Father he adds This is saith he the will of him that sent me that every one that seeth the Son and believeth in him should have life eternal Who doth no less most evidently confirm these things by performances which he expresses in word adding also miracles thereunto For how great a multitude do ye meet with every where through all the Evangelists whom you see saved and healed by no other thing but faith only which relied on Christ. How often do we hear from the mouth of the Lord in the Gospel thy Faith hath made thee whole without hearing any mention of works And what Christ performed to faith will Osorius attribute that to Works
Christ invites unto himself Consciences that are afflicted and burdened with sin Isaiab calls all that are athirst to come without price or any exchange to the Fountains of Christ that they may be refreshed Osorius will bestow the Kingdom which God hath promised upon none but righteous men and eminent good works I beseech you Sir according to your righteousness what excellent good work brought that sinful Woman with her in the Gospel out of whom seven Devils were cast What righteousness appeared in the Thief on the Right Hand of Christ except faith only why he should after the commiting so many evil deeds enter in together with Christ on the same day into Paradise what other thing did the Woman of Canaan that was a stranger bring to Christ but an importunate cry of faith so that she carried home not Crumbs but whole Loaves of Divine Grace What deserved the miserable Woman with the bloody Issue or Iairus the Governour of the Synagogue or Zacchaeus of Matthew or other Publicans with them why they being perferred before the Pharisees who seemed so much more righteous should obtain the benefit of free favour being so obvious and exposed unto them There is almost an infinite number of others of the like condition that may be discoursed of after the same manner in whom you can find nothing worthy of so great bounty of Divine Grace but faith only Blind Bartimeus cried the Lepers cried Iesus Master thou Son of David have mercy on us and they were heard For nothing cries louder than faith nothing is more effectual to prevail Let Osorius also cry and let us all cry with the like noise of Faith and we shall be heard alike I speak of that faith which is in Christ Iesus besides which there is not any passage into Heaven nor access unto God nor way of prevailing with God Therefore that we may be heard let us come and knock but let us do it aright to wit by Faith and in the name of only begotten Otherways it is in vain to cry to God who hears not sinners but drives them away who regards not servants and guilty persons unless they come to the Son or in the name of the Son Now by what way we are heard by the same we are Iustified For the Divine reward is always joyned with righteousness Seeing then all of us mortal men are by nature sinners and servants of sin therefore we must see what that is which makes us of servants free men of guilty persons sons of sinners righteous For this is the whole subject matter of the debate this is the question on which the whole controversie depends which is not so difficult to be judged of if the authority of Sacred Scripture may prevail upon impartial judgments For the testimony of the Gospel remains sure and eternal which no mortal man can weaken at any time instructing our faith thus As many as received him to them he gave power to become the Sons of God and that he may teach what it is to receive him he presently explains the same to them saith he that believe in his name c. Whereby it appears evidently what it is to which we are beholden for all that splendor and dignity wealth and riches yea and the possession of Heaven and Life I know that in those excellent offices of good works which you so much cry up in the exercise of charity and observance of Righteousness there is great weight and also great benefit as I consess also that the law it self hath great efficacy if a man use it lawfully Now the use of the law consists in this that it should bring us to Christ and be subservient to his glory But when you have heaped all these things together into one whatsoever were by God either prescribed to us in his Law or written within us they are far from restoring perfection to a mans deeds that are altogether imperfect or to a mans person that is wholly destroyed and ruinated They are far from making us of servants freemen of Slaves of Satan Sons of God heirs of his Kingdom co-heirs of Christ fellow Citizens of the Saints and Domesticks of the highest Father Verily that is not the Office of the Law but of Christ And it is not righteousness but grace that does this This is not the efficacy of works but of Faith which relying not upon works but being strengthned only by the promise of God brings us from bondage to liberty from death to life adopts us being reconciled unto God makes us Sons of the promise which is so far from being joyned with Charity and Works that it reconciles Charity it self and all works of life unto God and justifies them without which they could not have place in Heaven in the presence of the great God Upon what account and how Faith justifies Fallen Sinners NOW because I have demonstrated what the power of Faith is and what it performeth I must of necessity explain upon what account and for what cause Faith procureth unto it self so great efficacy and power of Iustifying how it is said to Iustifie alone without Works and what Men the same Iustifies whether the righteous or the wicked If the righteous what need is there now of Iustification or Faith when the Law is sufficient If the wicked whether those that are penitent and converted or the impenitent and rebellious If the Faith of Christ justifies the penitent frees them from guilt and makes them righteous of unrighteous which neither you your self can deny Why then do you inveigh against Luther so unmodestly and undeservedly Does Luther either say or teach any other thing Where does he at any time let loose the Reins to sin or promise liberty to the wicked or preach Iustification otherways than to those who being reformed by Repentance breathe after Christ and joyn themselves to him by Faith What Will you shut out those from all hope of pardon I trow not And what remedy then will you shew them Will you send us to the Faith of Christ or to the Sentence of the Law to heal our wounds What if the Law gives no help here and there is not any other thing in man that can help righteousness once violated except Faith only placed in Christ which neither you your self can deny And if this very Faith brings Salvation to none but those that deplore the sins they have committed which together with you Luther affirms to what purpose are those out-cries against Luther so Tragical and raised without any cause Wherefore then dost thou deceive us O Luther For when thou d'dst condemn pious tears and didst cast reproaches upon wise sorrowfulness and didst plead that all works were not only unprofitable but pernicious And presently going on in the same stile and waxing more violent For when say you thou didst put so much in faith that thou saidst there was help enough in that only the sense of thy
Concl. Therefore from Faith men are rightly and formally called righteous before God Again Ma. They that do justly should be called just before God Mi. They that believe in the Son of God do most justly Concl. Therefore they that believe in the Son of God are deservedly called just For what can any man do more justly or more holily than to believe in the only begotten Son of God and to embrace him with all his faith as the Gospel bears witness This is the work of God that ye should believe in him whom he hath sent And what Doctrine is more excellent than to know Christ the Son of God aright and the power of his Death and Resurrection Which knowledge how much it is valued by God above all other disciplines and arts it may appear by this which is foretold unto us of Christ by the Divine Prophet and my Righteous Servant saith he by his Knowledge shall justifie many What if our Iustification is placed only in the knowledge of the Son of God and the Faith of the Son is nothing else but knowledge Divinely Inspired what credit then should be given to those Iesuitical Sophisters who neither admit of any external cause of justifying nor acknowledge any other but this which they themselves place in Works And now what will they answer to this Argument of Augustin Ma. Whence we are saved thence we are just Mi. By Faith we are saved and reconciled to God and become Conquerors according to that saying of the Gospel This is the Victory which overcomes the World our Faith Conclu Therefore by Faith the name of Righteousness is rightly given to us according to the Testimony of Augustin But those Praters will not yet hold their Peace neither do they endure any either Internal or External Righteousness but this only which they describe in Works and the observance of the Law And they endeavour to prove it by this caption First then as touching Faith though that is an internal Vertue yet they plead that it doth not otherways justifie but upon the account of Charity But thus they dispute concerning the righteousness of Christ Because it is not our own but is peculiar to Christ. There is no cause why a Man should take upon him the Name of Righteous from that Righteousness which is anothers to wit according to the Law of Aristotle Which how frivolous it is and contrary to the Faith of the Gospel it will not be difficult to demonstrate by very clear words of Scripture for to what purpose is the Divine Love Preached in the Gospel and in the Prophets to have given Christ his only begotten Son unto the World Unless he had been willing to make us partakers together with him of all his Wealth Vertues Merits and whatsoever good things belong to him Whence Paul He that spared not his own Son but delivered him up for us all how shall he not with him freely give us all things What if Christ was given to us byhis Father poured forth exposed and is wholly made ours with all his goods and gifts is there any thing in him whether Wisdom or Iustice or Sanctification or Life or Victory or Death or any other thing besides which we may not by a due right lay claim to as our own If it is ours upon what account then do those Gymnosophists Preach that it belongs not to us Of which thing we may reason thus Ma. Whatsoever Christ did for us is esteemed ours just as if it had been done by our selves Mi. Christ fulfilled all Righteousness for us Conclu Therefore all the Righteousness of Christ is ours by Faith just as if it had been fulfilled by us It is 〈◊〉 by the Example of Adam that Christ's Righteousness is ours PErhaps the thing will appear more evident by Example Let us look upon Adam and in him let us behold the publick calamity of our Nature And also let us contemplate Salvation restored again by the second Adam from the ruine received by the first For if the Doctrine and Force of contraries be the same according to Philosophers it will be more easie by that means from the Evil of the one to judge of the advantages of the other Then let us compare both Adams with one another The first Earthly of the Earth with this second Heavenly from Heaven Who though in their whole Nature they are most different one from another Yet by the singular Wisdom of God it so comes to pass that there is a wonderful resemblance between things that differ very much and the reason of our Salvation being restored agrees most aptly with the reason of the ruine received First in this that both were Originally Princes and Authors of our Propagation one of the Earthly and the other of the Heavenly And then afterwards there was added another thing in which he was a wonderful Type and Image of Christ who was to come a long time after How that came to pass we shall very well learn of Paul himself As saith he by the Disobedience of one Man many were made Sinners So by the Obedience of one many shall be made Righteous and doubling the same again and again in many words As faith he by one Man Sin entred into the World and by Sin Death came upon all Men in that all have Sinned c. And presently If therefore by the Sin of one Man Death came upon all Men to Condemnation in like manner by the Iustification of one Man good is propagated unto all Men to the Iustification of Life What is more clear than these words of the Apostle The whole force and summ of the Argument drives at this that the true Nature of our Righteousness is not due to our Vertues but we must be beholden for it to the merit of another Setting before us such a sense as this by Argument Argument Ma. In what manner Unrighteousness is propagated in the World in the same manner also Righteousness comes Mi. Unrighteousness is propagated by the Sin of one Man Only Conclu Therefore also Righteousness by the merit of one only is derived unto all that are allied to Christ by Faith Otherways Ma. As the matter is between Adam and us after the same manner is the matter between us and Christ. Mi. The sin of one Adam is imputed to all his Posterity yea all those who transgressed not with him Conclu Therefore The Righteousness of one Christ is imputed to all his Posterity to wit that believe in him though they did not obey with him Which things seeing they are of themselves clear and conspicuous the Point calls us to return to you O most excellent Osorius who seem either not to head carefully enough or else perniciously to deny that which Paul Discourses of Imputation so copiously and weightily Wherefore again and again beseeching you I appeal to this sacred Righteousness whereof you write and also to the equity of your own humanity that having
yours deserves You only look at how much you proceed in running but you do not also take heed how much you fail in your race And after all these things do you yet boast of your merits as if the reward of the Everlasting state were due to your Labours In which assertions I do not drive at this to dissolve the Pious endeavours of making Progress or to dishearten them by desperation For the Admonition of the Apostle is not in vain so run that ye may obtain And again no Man is Crowned except he strive Lawfully Let us therefore so strive that we may be Crowned let us so run that we may obtain But we do not therefore obtain because we run but we do therefore run because the promise is made to them that run not to them that slumber So that the running is not the cause of the promise but the promise stirs up to running and adds alacrity to the runners Therefore the Apostle that he may make them the more valiant in striving adds this promise your labour shall not be in vain in the Lord. And speaking of himself I have fought saith he the good fight and a Crown of Righteousness is laid up for me c. What then do you not see that labours well performed have their own reward due to them Be it so indeed But we treat not here of the labours of Men but of the merits of Labours we do not ask with what rewards the goodness of God dignifies us but what we our selves deserve to receive For there is no small difference between Gift and Merit If Merit is called that to which a recompense of reward is due by reason of its equality it is certain there is no equality between those things which we do here on Earth and those things which being promised we expect in Heaven The Inheritance of the Everlasting Kingdom is promised not that which upon the account of hire is due to our Works but which is promised to our Faith by the free gift of God Whence Paul when he said the wages of Sin his Death he doth not add next thereunto the reward of them that live Godly is Life Eternal But the grace saith he or the gift of God is Eternal Life And why doth he not as well say the reward of Righteousness is Eternal Life But that the difference between gift and reward between grace and recompence might be evident For if it is of grace than it is not of works If of works than it is not of grace But now that he might manifest the Infinite Riches of Divine Grace towards us through Christ Iesus He Proclaims openly that we are saved through Grace by Faith And that not of our selves it is the gift of God not of Works lest any Man should boast Which also elsewhere inculcating more clearly He says not by works of Righteousness which we have done How then But according to his mercy hath he saved us And now what is that mercy but the favour and loving kindness of God which remitting the rigour of Iustice spares those that are unworthy pardons the penitent receives them that are undone into favour which favour or mercy also glories against Iudgment All which being so what should be said of the Hypocritical Fathers of Trent who by the publick decree of their Senate pronounce those accursed whosoever dare say that the grace of God whereby we are justified is only the favour of God The Absurd Paradox of the Tridentines whereby they deny that we are justified by the favour of God only BUT Now by what other thing then will they say that we are justified if we obtain it not by the favour of God only By the Law But that works Wrath By the works of the Law But the Apostle expresly excludes those Not of works lest any Man should boast But here I call to mind the ordinary Glosse which doth resolve no difficulty but makes one by it's subtile comment partly affirming that we are justified by works and partly denying it For thus it says our works as they are ours have no power to justifie yet consider them as they are not from us but are wrought by God in us through Grace they merit Iustification And for that cause the Apostle would not say the wages of Righteousness is Eternal Life But chose rather to say the grace of God is Eternal Life Why so Because saith this device those merits to which Eternal Life is rendered are not from us but they come from grace whence they receive the vertue of meriting O wise yea rather wild talk to vilifie grace What if the Spirit of Christ influencing the Hearts of his own stirs up the Holy Offices of Charity and excellent motions to Piety What doth not the same Spirit also vouchsafe all other gifts to his Church bestowing on some gifts of Prophesie on others divers kinds of Tongues on others admirable Vertues of Curing and Healing and on others of Teaching for the Edification of the Saints What shall we therefore place our whole Iustification in those gifts received from Christ I know that there are both many and eminent vertues wherewith the Spirit of Christ always adorns his Church but it is one thing to adorn another thing to justifie the Church The gift of Sanctification is one thing the cause of justifying is another both whereof though Christ perform by his grace yet he Sanctifies one way and Iustifies another for he Sanctifies by his Spirit but he Saves and Iustifies only by his Death and Blood But you will say if Salvation is not placed in Grace why then is the grace of God called by Paul Eternal Life Verily it is certain and must be confessed which Paul teaches that our Life must be attributed wholly unto grace to which also it behoves us to attribute all other things But we must look what way this grace saves and justifies for it is that on which the whole controversy depends In which the generality of the adversaries are greatly deceived Against the Tridentines It is Demonstrated by the Scriptures that the grace of God whereby we are Iustified consists only in the free favour of God and Remission of sins not in the Merits of Works or Infusion of Charity THomas Aquinas and they that follow him according to the gloss which they call ordinary do not deny that which the Apostle affirms That we are saved by the Grace of God But if you ask after what manner they answer that it comes to pass upon the account of good Works For these are the words of the Gloss Grace says it is called Eternal Life because it is rendered to those Merits which grace hath conferred And to the same Sense are the Comments of Orbelius Bonaventure Halensis and others because say they without grace no Man can observe the Commands of God And Thomas adds elsewhere that to fulfill the Commands of the Law according to the
upon the Mercy of God only forgiving us our sins for Christ's sake Let us add hereunto the reckoning of Oecumenius lest we should not be too sufficiently guarded with Witnesses who commenting on the words of Paul Rom. chap. 3. Wherefore says he all after they believed in Christ are justified freely bringing Faith only with them and also intimating what that is wherein all the assurance of our Salvation is placed he introduces the remission of sins only in these words Being washed from our sins by Iesus Christ c. And again confirming this same and asking how this Iustification is brought to pass he makes answer himself saying By remission of sins which we have in Christ Iesus And soon after demonstrating the same more evidently viz. wherein Righteousness or the Iustifying Grace of God chiefly consists Herein says he that men who are dead in sins may be justified by the remission of sins Behold a demonstration of Righteousness set before you that not only God himself is righteous but also justifies his People by the Faith of Iesus By which there are two things which you may see to be very evident First That all power of justifying is placed in Faith only according to this man's Opinion where he says bringing Faith only with them and then That against the Tridentines he teaches that all this Iustification received by us from God consists in the remission of sins For what is more evident than this speech All Iustification which proceeds to us from God consists either in the forgiving of iniquities or in the covering of the same or in their not being imputed c. And these things we have said hitherto are taken out of Oecumenius to whom if we must agree what credit then should be given to those Catholick Tridentines who deny that they are justified by the remission of sins only which how contrary it is to all reason I need not plead against them with many Arguments because they ought to be convinced of falshood by nothing more than by their own Actions For who looks into the Lives of those Popes Cardinals Bishops Monks but he may easily perceive by those things which he daily sees that there is nothing whereof they stand in greater need or desire more ardently than the gracious Clemency of God in forgiving those sins which they have committed This doth appear both many other ways and also it is most evidently testified by their publick and daily wishes suffrages and prayers In their Temples in their Liturgies in the Solemnities of their Masses in their Antiphonies what other thing do they cry for what do they request of God but that they may obtain the pardon of their own sins and the sins of their Parents and Benefactors Otherways what is the meaning of those words daily repeated in the Prefaces of their Masses Let the Almighty and Merciful Lord give unto us the indulgence absolution and remission of all our sins C What is the meaning of so many Advocates in Heaven Patrons and Favourites to obtain Mercy from God Moreover to what purpose are those words wherewith they daily confess to God and blessed Mary and all Saints And again when they days and nights without measure and end vehemently call upon the He-Saints and the She-Saints and chiefly the blessed Mary with such sort of cryes By thy pious interposing wash away our faults O most holy Virgin Mother of Grace I am unworthy of Grace and less than all thy Mercies My sins 〈◊〉 anding in opposition O most holy I deserve not to be heard by 〈◊〉 O immaculate hide not thy face from me so 〈◊〉 a sinner O Star of the Sea suffer me not to wander from the way but by the guidance of thy Light deliver me from the darkness of sins O Queen of Mercy do not lose the renown of thy Antient Mercy in me a miserable sinner Hail Saviouress Redeem me O Redeemeress My sins burden me The World wraps me up I have sins I know not Merits O most bountiful take away my sins draw me from the World c. I beseech you good men what is the meaning of these Monsters of Religion If those things be true which your prayers declare how is not your Doctrine false with what Solder or Glue will these things so dis-joyned cleave to one another that they who by an assiduous deploring of their sins confess themselves to be sinners the same men should seem to themselves to be formally just and perfect men in the sight of God by inward Renovation that they should say they are less than the Mercies of the holy Virgin and in the mean while the Mercy of God should be less than that it can justifie alone That they know not Merits and yet bring in no other thing but Merits to make Iustification perfect What a contradiction is this of the Divines Or who should suppose them worthy to be believed who contradict in their Temples that which they dispute for in their Schools For they pray so as if they were void of all Righteousness But in Councils they so behave themselves as if no Unrighteousness were inherent in them and as if nothing were wanting to perfection of Righteousness Now these things being so what remains to be said to these Men but that with Hierom we should say this Let those Men either defend what they say or forsake what they cannot defend The Prophet cries It is the Lord's Mercy that we are not consumed and those Men hope that they shall not be saved by Mercy only but shall be Righteous before God by the Righteous performance of Works Isaiah so great a Prophet or rather Evangelist under the sense of his sins confesses his lips are unclean And the same elsewhere says We have all gone astray like Sheep Daniel in his Prayer laments We have sinned we have done wickedly we have behaved our selves unrighteously and departed from thy Commandments c. And lest any Man should pretend that these things were signified by the Prophets not in their own Name who were Saints but in the person of the People the Prophet presently made confession of himself adding Whilst I was yet praying and confessing my sins and the sins of my People c. Abraham and Sarah though praised upon the account of their Faith were rebuked in their laughter and their very thought was rebuked as a point of unbelief and their silent Motion of Heart was not hid from the knowledge of God though they were not Condemned of distrust because they laughed Moses than whom none was more familiar with God after he had received so great a power of grace yet he offended at the waters of strife and did not obtain to enter with his Brother Aaron into the Land of promise Peter the Apostle in whom so great gifts of grace received shined forth yet he is almost drowned and deserved to hear O thou of little Faith wherefore didst thou doubt If
the cause of blessedness this manner of arguing will appear to be more forcible by an evident Testimony of Scripture Argument Ma. That which is the cause of blessedness the same is the cause of Iustification Mi. Remission of Sins is the cause of blessedness and Salvation Con. Theresore Remission of Sins is the cause of Iustification But you may say What must then be answered to the Words of Christ who seems to promise the blessedness of the Kingdom as a reward of Works You may find an answer to this objection in the Book of Iacobus Cartusiensis who hath written on this manner Men do accept and love the persons of others for their Works that are acceptable and profitable to them but God accepts the Works for the sake of the person c. Therefore here there is need of a distinction between the Work and the person of the Worker But you may say Are not Works that are performed in Charity for the relief of the Poor pleasing and acceptable to God We deny not that our selves But we enquire into the cause wherefore they become acceptable Which that it may appear the more evidently let us examine these words of Scripture I was an hungred said Christ and ye gave me Meat I was thristy and ye gave me Drink c. I ask in the first place who is it here that was an hungred You will say Christ either himself in his own Body or in a Member of his Body Did you then feed Christ when he was an hungred That was Piously done indeed Therefore I see and commend what you have done But I ask what was it that stirred you up to do it Whether was it Charity setting Faith a work or was it not rather Faith setting Charity a work But what if some other that was no Member of Christ whether Heathen or Turk had need of your Meat Would you in your Charity have fed him I doubt of that But suppose you your self had not believed in Christ but had been an Enemy to him if you had seen one that belonged to Christ almost ready to perish for hunger would you have relieved him I do not believe so Why Because it is only believers that feed Christ but Infidels persecute him The Lord was thirsty on the Cross and he had Vinegar given him for drink which was a Hellish wickedness But why did they give him Vinegar Was it want of Love or was it not rather want of Faith in those unbelieving Pharisees Who if they had not wanted Faith they would not have wanted Charity to administer help and Charity would not have been unrewarded But let us proceed Suppose one that is not a believers whether Turk or Heathen should refresh a hungry Christian by giving him of his Meat as old Simon the Pharisee entertained Christ with a Dinner And many of the Heathens have been Eminent in offices of kindness and Love Can the giving of Meat and Drink by any such without Faith merit Eternal Life Surely not But if a believer gives his Christian Brother so much as a Cup of cold Water in his necessity shall he lack his Reward Christ himself says he shall not Hereby you may see whence it is that our Vertues and good deeds are acceptable to God and dignified with Rewards not for themselves but for the Faith of him that works them which first justifies the person before all works And after the person is justified his performances are accepted and though they are of small value in themselves yet they are looked upon as great and rewarded plentifully Wherefore we deny not that sometimes in the Scriptures the name of Reward is joyned with Eternal Life and that the works of Brotherly Charity may in some sense be called meritorious if so be these works are performed by persons who are already justified and received into favour by remission of sins and have obtained a right unto the promise of Eternal Life Not that their works are of such value that they should make satisfaction to the Law of God or merit any thing with God ex congruo or condigne as they phrase it either by congruity or worthiness But they are imputed as Merit by Grace Not that Eternal Life is due to the works themselves but because there are consolations laid up in Heaven for Saints and persons in a justified state to support them in their afflictions Eternal Life not being due to them for their works but by right of the promise just as a Son and Heir to whom his Father's Inheritance is due doth not merit the right of Sonship by any duties that he performs but he being born a Son his duties upon that account are meritorious so that he wants not a due reward and recompence Therefore in this Popish Argument there is a fallacy Another Argument taken from the words of Christ Matth. 25. Da. HE that doth the will of the Father shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven Ti. It is the will of the Father that we should do good works that are commanded in his Law Si. Therefore an entrance into Heaven is obtained by the works of the Law Answer Suppose we grant all contained in this Argument what will these Roman Iusticiaries infer from thence Therefore as Vega speaks Faith is not sufficient to Salvation without the keeping of the Commandments It is easie to answer him in a word Let him keep the Commandments according to the exact Rule of the Divine Will and he shall be saved But neither he nor any other man can perfectly keep the Commands of God in this Life From whence we infer this by necessary consequence That either there is no hope of obtaining the Kingdom or else that it lies not in the works of the Law Now if it be so what remains but that finding this is not the way to Heaven we should seek for another way and because there is no door of Salvation opened to sinners in the Law of Commandments therefore we must flie to another Refuge But what that Refuge is appearing to us from Heaven it self the Divine Will declares unto us which is not set forth in the Old Law but in the New Testament of the Gospel And this is his Will that every one who believeth in the Son should not perish but have Eternal Life For whereas the Law was weak because of the flesh God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin condemned sin in the flesh that the Righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us that walk not after the flesh but after the spirit Objection But here some may object Will the Faith of Christ justifie us in such a manner that there may be a Legality and Impunity for us to disobey the Will of his Father God forbid The Liberty of the Gospel allows not that for it openly affirms That they who are justified by the Faith of Christ walk not after the flesh but
in so many dangers and compassed about with so many troubles and snares yet it continues firm notwithstanding all this opposition in spite of the very Gates of Hell Wherefore is it thus Is it for its own merits or should we account the Grace and Power of Christ to be the only procuring cause thereof and no strength nor merit of ours Now it is evident to every reasonable man that the same thing which is the cause of Preservation is also the cause of Salvation to the Church which consists not in our Works but only in the Faith of Christ and his free Bounty An Argument out of St. Iames. Not the hearers of the Law but the doers shall be justified Not the hearer of the Law but the doer shall be blessed Iames 1. Mat. He that heareth my words and doth them c. Therefore not Faith only but Deeds do justifie I answer The Argument may be granted if the Minor be rightly added with the Inference which we shall set down here that the Argument may appear in its perfect form He is righteous that by deeds fulfils the Law No man by deeds fulfils the Law in this life Therefore no man is justified by deeds in this life The Minor is evident by the Authority of the same Apostle Iames Whosoever shall keep the whole Law and offend in one thing is guilty of all There is none in the Land of the Living but fails in some thing Iames 2. Yea there is no man that offends not in many things Therefore no man in this life fulfils the Law of God no not Iames himself Let us now consider the words of Christ that are cited out of the Gospel He that heareth my words and doeth them c. Who doth not clearly apprehend the mind of Christ in these words for it is manifest that his design was to rebuke the counterfeit pretences of Hypocrites and thereby to stir up the minds of his own Disciples to the power of Godliness and sincerity in their profession which he doth in more than one place and not without weighty reasons For as nothing is more detestable so nothing is more usual than for false Hypocrites to be covered with a Vizard of Holiness who having no experimental knowledge of the things which they profess nor drawn unto God by Effectual Calling nor taught by his Spirit being ignorant of God and strangers to the practice of Holiness do make a great shew amongst all men outwardly pretending to that which they are not indeed but would seem to be who take little or no care at all to be any way instrumental for the Glory of God But their chief endeavours are to encrease their gain and satisfie their ambitious desires that they may be great in this World and get applause and renown amongst men Such a frame of spirit is in most Hypocrites But the great searcher of hearts who looks into every dark corner of the Soul and discerns all the most hidden imaginations is not unacquainted with their Hypocrisie and there is nothing more abominable unto him Therefore our Lord in giving Instructions of Piety to his Disciples strictly commands that such as take upon them the profession of Faith in his Name should not only make shew of it in words or account it enough to encline their Ears to his Doctrine but also practise it in their Lives and endeavour as much as in them lies to walk suitable to their profession By what I have said it may evidently appear that these words do not express the way how we are justified but they only declare what manner of men they ought to be who are Iustified and have obtained a right to the Heavenly Inheritance by Faith and free Grace Another Argument The Foolish Virgins were shut out of Heaven not because they wanted Faith but because they neglected taking Oyl in their Vessels Mat. 25. The same appears in the slothful Servant Therefore The Kingdom of Heaven is due to good Works and not to Faith Answer The Consequence must be denied For this is the true consequence thereof Therefore Men are justly shut out of Heaven for Evil deeds and Impiety For though a slothful and lazy Servant ought to be shut out of the House yet it doth not therefore follow that the Inheritance must needs be due to him that faithfully and diligently performs his duty The Kingdom of Heaven is given to faith not to duties by way of gift not by way of bargain not for merits but freely And though faith in the mean while is not idle but diligently exercises it self in the ways of Holiness yet the possession of this great benefit should not therefore be attributed unto Works suppose an adopted Son in managing well his Father's Goods shews himself a faithful Steward in his Father's House is not his Father's Inheritance bestowed upon him of free gift notwithstanding all this care and industry Moreover that is not true which is denied in the Antecedent that the foolish Virgins were not shut out for want of Faith For had they had true Faith they would not have wanted provision of Oyl For Faith that is lively cannot be slothful Therefore in Scripture these Epithets are given to Faith 1. That it is true and not feigned 2. It is sure and not wavering 3. One and not diverse 4. Lively and not dead 5. Great 6. Fervent and not luke warm 7. Laborious and not Idle 8. Strong 9. Couragious and not fearful 10. Stable and not unconstant Another Objection taken out of Iohn 5. They that have done good shall come forth unto the Resurrection of Life and they that have done evil unto the Resurrection of Damnation and again Rom. 2. Every Man shall be rewarded according to his Works The Argument of the Adversaries taken out of Ioh. 5. Rom. 2. Therefore the Salvation or Destruction of Men depend on their Works and not Faith only If any Man desires to see this Argument in a Syllogistical term he may take it thus There is no Iustification without Works where there is a reward given according to Works The Iudgment of God rewards according to VVorks Therefore there is no Iustification in the Iudgment of God without VVorks Answer As there is nothing more sure than the Words of Peter in which he affirms that Christ is appointed Iudge of the Living and the Dead so also that is a truth which is asserted by Paul That we must all appear before his Iudgment Seat who will render to every Man according to that which he hath done whether Good or Evil. Therefore you say Not Faith but Works do justifie which are the procuring cause either of Salvation or Destruction But this is not the consequence of the Words of the Apostle nor the sense of that Scripture But if we Reason according to the mind of the Holy Ghost in these places of Scripture we must rather draw
consists not in the Merits of Works but in Grace only and the Hope of Mercy unto which Men fly for refuge in their emptyness of Vertues as he speaks But let us proceed Another Argument Evil Works deserve Eternal Destruction Therefore Good Works Merit Eternal Life Answer Both are true indeed if you consider things in respect of the just rewards due unto them For as the vile Abominations of an Ungodly Life procure the Wrath and Vengeance of God so Works of Righteousness would procure his favour if we could perform good things with as great perfection as we do Evil things But because we cannot do that therefore of our selves we can deserve nothing according to the rules of Iustice but only Death and Damnation But now by the right of Redemption through Christ we are set free from the Law of Iustice and translated into the Kingdom of Grace by Vertue of a new Covenant whereby it comes to pass that God hath respect not to our Merits but only to Christ the price of our Redemption Therefore I answer That this opposition of contraries is of force according to the strict severity of the Law but not according to the Grace of the Gospel for here there is a block put in the way To wit The Blood of the Redeemer that frees us from the Law of Sin and Death Moreover the Argument from contraries avails not except the contraries are set equally in their full extent one against another Now Evil Works in us are perfectly Evil but good Works though assisted by Grace yet because of the refractary imperfection of the Flesh in the sight of God are imperfect at the best as they are performed by us Wherefore Hierom says The perfection of all Righteous Men in the Flesh is Imperfection Another Argument The Grace of Iustification is lost by Evil Works Therefore it is retained by good Works Answer By the same Answer the Fallacy of this Sophistical Argument is discovered because our Sins and Vertues are not equally contrary to one another But whereas it is said that the Grace of Iustification is retained by Obedience though this in some sense may be granted yet Iustification is not thereby procured Moreover when we say It is retained by Works that should not be so understood as if this were done for the Merit of the Actions but only for the sake of the Redeemer upon whose account first the person is accepted and afterwards the actions are well pleasing which otherways would be unclean and of no value They say that perseverance in Righteousness is lost by Evil Works But Evil Works as they are in us admit of a twofold consideration either as they are inherent in us as in all Saints thro' the infirmity of the Flesh and we presently rise up again by Repentance and Faith And such kind of Sins as Paul asserts shall not have dominion over us or in the next place as we give up our selves to Sin against our own Conscience that we may serve it and take a sinful delight therein But such a Sin can by no means consist with this Faith whereof Paul speaks which hath place in none but those that are turned from Sin and returned to God Another Argument Faith Iustifies Faith is a Work Therefore Works Iustifie Answer I Answer The Argument is faulty because the middle term is of a larger extent in the Major than in the Minor For Faith in the Major is taken correlatively for Christ or the Promise which is apprehended by Faith In the Minor it is taken only for a quality of the Mind as it is an act of our Will Otherways if Faith is taken in the Minor just as it is in the Major it is false and the Minor should be denied To wit That Faith is a Work Another Argument of the Iesuits If Faith only Iustifies it would Iustifie without Charity Faith doth not Iustifie without Charity Therefore Faith only doth not Iustifie Answer I may oppose unto this Argument another not unlike it that the Fallacy of the one may appear the more easily by the other Thus then by way of Instance a Man may infer If the heat of Fire only makes warm then it makes warm without light But the heat of Fire doth not make warm without light joyned therewith Therefore The heat of the Fire only doth not make warm I doubt not but by this mutual comparing of Arguments it appears evident to the Reader how like the one is to the other and consequently how he should judge thereof so that there is no need of any further Refutation For all things that are joyned and agree together in some respects are not therefore engaged in the same Office He that hath Feet Eyes and Ears though he hath not these Members in separation from one another yet it is an untruth if it is said That he sees not with his Eyes only or walks not with his Feet only Though I deny not that in the performance of those duties which belong to this Life Faith is not separated from Charity So if we look upward to things that are Divine and Eternal if we contemplate and view what that is which can help us at our appearance before the Dreadful Iudgment Seat of God and appease his Wrath and deliver us from Eternal Destruction and conquer Death and the Devil and regain the favour of God and Iustifie us and procure us the Crown of Life Faith only in the Mediatour doth so bear rule in these affairs and so fully performs all things requisite to our Salvation and Redemption that here Charity hath nothing to do for the Kingdom is not promised or due to you because you love this or that Neighbour after your manner but contrarily because you neither love God as you ought nor your Neighbour as your self therefore unavoidable destruction is due to you unless Faith only through the Mediatour should come in for your help and set you free from the condemnation due unto you notwithstanding your Charity Faith is so far from needing to be joyned with Charity for Iustification that unless Charity it self were justified by Faith it could not stand nor keep it self from falling to ruine and Destruction Of the like nature is that Argument which they wrest out of the Writings of the Apostle Paul An Argument out of 1 Cor. 13. If I have all Faith so that I can remove Mountains but have not Charity I am nothing Therefore Iustification comes by Faith and good Works Answer Erasmus did write in his Exposition on the Second Chapter of Iames Faith which is cold without Charity and puts not forth it self when the matter requires it is not Faith but only the Name of Faith c. They of Paris argue contray ways that Faith can be without Charity out of this place of Paul If I have all Faith so that I can remove Mountains Erasmus following Basil Interprets this Scripture on this manner That we should take this to
be feigned by the Apostle for Amplification which is not nor can be And seeing Thomas Aquin. here by all Faith understands perfect Faith Therefore because perfect Faith is not found without Charity it is necessary that according to the Interpretation of Basil we should here take notice of a Trope or Fiction which Quintilian also reckons amongst the forms of amplifying Therefore whereas we deny a Dead Faith without Charity to deserve the name of Faith we speak this by a very usual Trope as we say That an unprofitable and idle Man is no Man or Wine which is decayed and hath lost its strength is no Wine Therefore that which is cited out of Paul If I have all Faith but have not Charity c. Must be understood thus Not that Paul simply affirms Faith to be a gift of God without Charity But he speaks Figuratively to amplifie the praise of Charity as he that says Though I have an hundred Tongues and as many Mouths yet I could not fully set forth the matter as it is he doth not therefore presuppose that there is any Man who hath an hundred Tongues and as many Mouths Paul useth the like Figurative Speech Though I speak with the Tongues of Men and Angels for Angels have no Tongues but it is feigned by way of Amplification to signifie some excellent Tongues surpassing those that are human Thus he said If what hath been hitherto said doth not satisfie the Adversaries I Answer thus That this Speech of Paul belongs not to the manner of Iustification but to the Life of the Iustified Person If I have all Faith saith he But want Charity c. What then Therefore Charity enters together with Faith into Iustification But this is no good Consequence But this is rather the consequence thereof Therefore Charity is necessary in the Regenerate Which must of necessity be granted for Love is necessary and pleasing to God To wit In those that are in a state of Reconciliation and for the sake of Christ. For God naturally delights in the Obedience of his own Which though it be imperfect yet he approves of any endeavours in those that are reconciled unto him by Christ. So then Faith that is Christ apprehended by Faith Iustifies us freely But on the other side we must not receive this Grace in vain But he receives it in vain who is not obedient to the precepts and example of Christ. Howbeit there are also some that answer that this Faith here mentioned by the Apostle should only be taken for the Faith of Working Miracles amongst whom is Chrysostom who calls this the Faith not of Doctrine but of Miracles Moreover whereas they urge this word of the Apostle as if he had used it in a general signification To this it may be answered that the Word all signifies often not the universality of a kind but the perfection of a species to which it is joyned as 2 Cor. 9. God is able to make every good gift abound in you that having all sufficiency in all things c. In like manner in this place of Paul If I have all Faith that is the most perfect Faith of working Miracles so that I can remove Mountains c. Another place out of Paul 1 Cor. 13. Now these three remain Faith Hope and Charity but the greater of these is Charity Argument Our Iustification flows from the more worthy cause Charity is a thing more worthy and great than Faith Therefore we are justified more by Charity than by Faith Or if you would rather take it thus If we were justified by Faith and not by Charity Faith would be greater than Charity But Charity is greater than Faith Therefore we are justified rather by Charity than by Faith Answer That I may briefly Answer both these Arguments First let us rightly conceive not only the words of the Apostle but in what sense he speaks them These three remain saith he but the greater of these is Charity in which words we hear the Apostle preferring Charity before Faith And we acknowledge it to be true but let us see in what sense it is true I will make use of an argument like it There hath not risen a greater than Iohn the Baptist amongst those that are born of Women Therefore Iohn the Baptist must be greater than Christ. I answer from the sense of the Scripture Though Christ seemed less than Iohn the Baptist by the judgment of the World and the general opinion of People yet in the Kingdom of Heaven he was and always will be greater than Iohn we may observe something like this in Faith and Charity Though in this World in Mens dealings with one another mutual Charity hath the preeminence Yet in the Kingdom of Heaven that is in our concernments with God against Satan Death Sin the Iudgement of God his Wrath and Vengeance and the terrors of Conscience Faith doth so far excel that it only hath the Dominion not only above Charity but also without it If the dignity and excellency of any thing is discernable by its effects and performances as a Tree is known by its Fruits let us now compare these Vertues with one another that it may the better appear what each of them can do what is the efficacy of Charity what Faith performs and how much it excels And first as touching Charity and its Offices let us hear how greatly the Apostle commends it Charity saith he is patient and bountiful and courteous fitted for every condition of Life Charity doth not envy doth not behave it self unseemly is not puffed up seeks not its own things but seeks the good of all it is not easily offended nor desirous of revenge and though it suffer injury it deviseth not to do evil to any man it delights not in the wickedness of the wicked but rejoyceth in the Truth it suffers all things believes all things hopes all things endures all things waiting for better with an undefatigable expectation Though other things may fail though Prophecies and Miracles and Knowledge may cease yet Charity will never fail mutual Love will endure for ever Hitherto ye have heard the Apostle set forth the duties and offices of Charity with deserved praise which though they are exceeding great and magnificent and cannot be sufficiently commended by any man according to their worth yet such is the nature of all these offices of Charity that they pass not beyond the bounds of this mortal Life and the mutual Communion of Christians with one another But now let us raise up our minds as high as we can to contemplate the power and efficacy of Faith and what it doth not only upon the Earth but in Heaven in the presence of God Whilst Charity is exercised in this inferiour World amongst men Faith ascends into the Kingdom of God where first by a sublime contemplation it lays hold on the Son of God the Mediatour at the right hand of Majesty
the Lord would intimate unto us by the Prophet the same thing that the Apostle declares to wit that we attain unto so great Felicity by the free Gift of God only and not by Works or Merits of Works For what can be the sense of these Words of the Apostle Without Works but the same that the Prophet expresseth in these Words without Money and without Price What hole can the Papists find here to creep out at Without our own Works say they or without those that go before Faith as Campian says or without the Works of the Law as Osorius speaks but not without the Works of Faith or those Works which flow from the Grace of God but this vain Sophistry is overthrown by the similitude of the Prophet which would be utterly absurd unless upon all accounts Salvation were freely offered without any Condition of Works For otherwise what will they answer the Prophet or how can they interpret his Words where he commands to eat without Money and without Price Will they distinguish Money in this place just as they distinguish Works So that they reject that Money as unprofitable which is our own being purchased by our own labours but what is given us of God they are so far from excluding this that unless we have it it is in vain to come and eat O vain janglings of Sophisters not so fit to be confuted by Arguments as to be hissed away and accursed by an Apostolical Execration Suitable hereunto is that saying of the same Prophet Ye were sold for nought and ye shall be redeemed without Silver What else can be understood by these Words but the freeness of the Infinite Mercy of God towards us without any Merit of ours Where then are the Merits of inherent Righteousness which the wicked bring before God if none obtain Iustification as they plead but those who are first endued with Charity and thereby are rendered just and worthy of Life Eternal For the Confirmation of what we assert let us add also the Example of Abraham From whence we may argue thus Argument Rom. 4. The VVorks of Abraham were done in Faith and Grace The VVorks of Abraham have no Praise or Glory before God Argument Therefore VVorks done by Faith and Grace Merit nothing before God I am not ignorant what these Interpreters Answer absurdly wresting these Words of Paul to another Sense contrary to the Mind of the Apostle For thus they comment upon this place If Abraham by VVorks c. The good VVorks of Abraham done in Faith are not by these Words excluded from Iustification neither is he declared to be justified by Faith only But the VVorks of the Law done without Faith are excluded which sort of VVorks because Abraham did not therefore he is truly said to be justified by his VVorks before God Moreover as they say it is not proved by these Words that the good Works of Abraham being a renewed Man and righteous though done in Faith did not justifie but that Abraham was not justified by Works only without Faith Thus they say What should I answer then but that their Interpretation doth not agree with the Mind of the Author Paul writing to the Romans when he had proved it by many and weighty Arguments That a Man is justified by Faith without Works being about to confirm the same by an Example He enquires concerning the Works of Abraham What shall we say that Abraham our Father according to the flesh found For if he was justified by Works he hath whereof to Glory but not before God c. First let us see what these Works were of which Paul treats and next whose Works they were The Adversaries Answer and amongst those Campian our Countrey-man who a while since when he was urged by this place of Paul concerning the Works of Abraham is reported to have answered thus like his own Iesuits the Works of the Law as they are done without Faith and Grace avail nothing to Iustification but because the Works of that Holy Man were not such being replenished with Faith and Grace therefore he is truly said to be justified by his own Works before God yet not as his own Works What do you say Was he justified by Works of whom Paul says expresly that he had no cause of glorying in his Works before God Was the Apostle ignorant of the Holiness and Excellency of the Works of the Godly Patriarch which were not without Faith and the Grace of God And yet Paul denies that these Works though excellent in themselves availed any thing before God in respect either of glorying or of Iustification And it is evident by the Authority of Paul that it was of Faith and nor of Works that he was justified before God for Abraham believed God and it was accounted to him for Righteousness How then will those Interpreters agree with the Apostle in affirming he denies for they contrarily do plead that Abraham was justified by his Works Whereas in opposition thereunto the whole scope of this Epistle is to remove the works of the Saints though excellent in themselves from Iustification not that pious works should be contemned but that the free Bounty of God towards sinners may evidently appear who liberally communicates his Righteousness not to the dignity of Merits but to Faith not to him that worketh but to him that believeth in him that justifies the ungodly who justifieth the ungodly saith the Apostle But here Campian objects after his former manner pleading first That Abraham was justified by Works and next he renders the reason why he was justified by Works because that his Works were not done in Circumcision nor in the Law but before Circumcision and the promulgation of the Law by Faith and Grace And therefore they were acceptable to God Thirdly Commenting upon the scope of the Epistle he affirms that we misunderstand the words of the Apostle because his whole drift through all that Epistle is to separate from Iustification the Ceremonies of the Law and the Works that were done before Faith in the Law or by the Law only without Grace For thus he reasons and such are all Camplan's Objections To all which I answer that they are most false 1. Whereas he affirms That Abraham was righteous by Works Paul expresly denies it Reason openly confutes it and the thing appears evident of it self For what need had he of the promised Seed and a Redeemer if already he had been righteous by Works or what need was there that Faith should be accounted unto him for righteousness who was afterwards to obtain the praise of Righteousness by Works Moreover death being the wages not of righteousness but of sin by what right could he be subject to the dominion of death if he had not been a sinner If he was a sinner how then was he righteous by works 2. Whereas he says That these works were not done according to the Law nor under the Law but before the
promulgation of the Law I would ask him What the Law is which if it is nothing but the Rule of Righteousness how can any man be just where there is no Law But what man was there ever in the World but he carried about with him the Law of God if not written in Tables yet written on his heart and engraven on his conscience But the Decalogue was not yet engraven on Tables of Stone But what was contained in the Moral Decalogue which that holy man did not already comprehend within his own heart both of loving God and his Neighbour of not Murthering of not committing Adultery or honouring Parents c. 3. As touching the scope of this Epistle how greatly is campian mistaken For who is so void of sense that he doth not clearly perceive that the drift of the Apostle is not that which those Iesuits dream of to attribute our Salvation or Iustification to any Works either going before or following after Neither was this Office of an Ambassadour committed unto him that he might contend with the Iews about Ceremonies or with the Gentiles about Moral Duties but as Peter was entrusted with the Apostleship of the Circumcision so also the Preaching of the Gospel to the Uncircumcision was committed unto Paul not that he should Preach the Law but the Faith which before he opposed Not that he might declare the Righteousness of Works in which there is no Salvation but that God by him might reveal his Son amongst the Gentiles and might manifest unto the World that heavenly Trophy and glad Tydings of Peace and Victory obtained in Heaven by Christ and spread abroad far and wide through the Churches the boundless riches of Divine Grace which he had experienced in himself For he was called for this purpose to the Apostleship that the infinitely gracious Lord and Redeemer Christ Iesus might first exercise his Mercy towards him and afterwards by him declare his great Mercy towards Sinners not only by hisExample but also by his Ministry For thus he bears witness of himself that the Ministry of Reconciliation was committed to him for which he was appointed to be a Preacher and Apostle and Teacher of the Gentiles in Faith and Truth that he being an Ambassadour in Christ's stead might invite all men yea and beg of them that they would be reconciled unto God And this seems to be the principal scope that Paul aims at not only in the Epistle to the Romans but also in all his Doctrine to proclaim amongst the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ and that he might set before the view of all men what is the Communion of the Mystery that was hidden with God in former Ages c. But now in the Righteousness of Works no such Mystery lay hidden with God from former Ages Therefore it is false and abominable which Campian the Iesuit and such like Sophisters assert concerning the scope and sense of Paul's Epistle to the Romans For by the Law which Paul excludes from Iustification they understand that part thereof which comprehends Ceremonial and Iudicial Works wherein the Iews gloried or Works purely Moral performed before Faith on which the Gentiles relied Yea on the contrary when Paul removes the Law from Iustification he doth not only exclude it upon the account of Iewish Ceremonies or Moral Works performed before Faith but also upon the account of its weakness through the flesh both in Iews and Gentiles both in the regenerate and the unregenerate so that it cannot make sufficient satisfaction to the Iustice of God And Paul affirms That for this cause God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh What did God do but what flesh could not do For sin he condemned sin in the flesh In what flesh ours or his own Sons Who of all the Regenerate though endued with great habitual Faith and Grace hath so led his life walking not according to the flesh but according to the spirit but he always carries about with him flesh that is weak in many respects and vicious and subject to sin Concerning which every one may complain with the Apostle I know that in me that is in my flesh dwells no good thing And again I find a Law that when I would do good evil is present with me c. For what they speak of Works following Faith and Grace how little that helps their cause appears not more evident by any Argument than by the Lives of those that maintain this Controversie if they be strictly enquired into If that be true which Campian with his Iesuits pleads for That Righteousness is not obtained in men come to years but by Works that follow after Faith Let us behold then what excellent Works this Faith of the Mother Church of Rome brings forth seeing they so much glory in the Title of Catholick Faith and Preach so many things about Charity which is the fulfilling of the Law Let us look into the Life and Works of the Roman Popes Cardinals and Bishops and the whole Crew of the Monks and Iesuits Where can you find more of the flesh or less of true holiness than in those false-hearted and painted Hypocrites whose whole profession of Religion consists in Purple Gowns high topped Mitres Purple Caps Rings adorned with Iewels solemn Vows Ceremonies which in reality are rather Stage-playes than Exercises of Piety This appears to be too true by the unhappy Tumults raised in the World the Wars and Persecutions that are stirred up by none more than by those very men that call themselves Spiritual and Catholick whom it should become to be the chiefest encouragers of Concord and Messengers of Peace But having so much enlarged upon this sort of men with their Works and Merits let us return to the Examples of those of whom we spake before who were freely admitted unto Baptism and received into favour by Faith without any commendation of Merits at all yea without mention of any Works except such perhaps as were evil Amongst which number those Iews may be reckoned of whom three thousand at one time were Baptized by Peter Likewise also the Eunuch whom Faith only without Works made not only meet for Baptism but also an Heir of the Heavenly Kingdom And the Iaylor whom Paul Baptized Moreover Paul himself and all the Apostles and Publicans the family of Cornelius Zacehaeus Mary Magdalen and the Thief on the Cross If Faith without Works was sufficient to them for the Grace of Baptism why not also for the obtaining of Iustification and Life Eternal Vega and those of his Association answers after his usual manner that in all these Repentance was joyned with Faith and other things also belonging to good Manners and a godly Life But it easily appears how vain and insignificant this Answer of Vega is He says Repentance and other Vertues are joyned with Faith Which tho' I confess to be in some sense true in the lives and persons of
Prov. 24. Prov. 24. 1 Iohn 1. August de Civitate Dei l. 19. c. 17. August in Ioan. Tract 4. Aug. Epist. 54. ad Macedon Andrad lib. 6. Lorichius c. 8. A brief summary of the things treated of before Iames 3. Faith only justifies sinners but whom Iames a Servant of Iesus Christ and Paul an Apostle of Iesus Christ reconciled Hosius in confut 〈◊〉 140. Canis in praefatione in Andrad 〈◊〉 Andrad Vega de justificat in Epist. Osor. de just 〈◊〉 7. Osor. ibid. 〈◊〉 2. An Answer to the Objections The consequence is denied The abuse of good things should be taken away but the things themselves should be continued Mark 16. Esa. 52. Hosius 〈◊〉 lib. 3. pag. 140. Against the assurance of Christian Salvation Objection Faith only Answer In Sermons frequent Exhortations are used to Pious Works An Answer to this Objection Ambiguity Faith only Iustifies but not all kind of Sinners The Love of Mary Magdaline Love rises from Faith not Faith from Love Charity is no cause of Iustification Psal. 34. Isa. 57. Andrad Vega. De Iustif. pag. 833. Coming to christ is believing in him Esa. 16. 9. Esa. 9. Ps. 107. Ioh. 1. If we confess our Sins he is faithful to sorgive us and the Blood of Iesus Christ cleanseth us from all Sin Faith only justifies the Uogodly but not unless he be first humbled by Repentance A Fallacy in the terms The Life of Faith is not begotten of Charity but only is evidenced thereby A twofold Life and Operation of Faith What Faith Works with God and what with Men. A twofold Opperation of Faith After what manner doth 〈◊〉 only Iustifie 〈◊〉 Life of Faith is not Charity but Christ. Gal. 2. 1 Cor. 4. Rom. 4. Ex Andrad Viga de Iustificatione Quaest. 1 Ex Canisio aliis August we are justified by that by which we are saved Psal. 32. Rom. 4. Blessed are they whose Iniquities are forgiven c. Iacobus Cartusiensis de Authoritate Ecclesiae An. 1440. Works withoutFaith thoeminent in themselves are of no value with God yet on the contrary the Works of believers that are mean in themselves lack not their reward How the name of reward in Scriptures is attributed to works Works imputed for Merits by Grace Andr. Vega. Iohn 6. Romans 8. Matth. 25. A notion of Bucer It is one thing to do the Will of the Father and another thing to obey it without any imperfection A feigned and hypocritical Faith An Answer to the first Argument Answer to the second The strength of our Vertues is weak Works please for the sake of the perfon being first reconciled Aug. de fide operibus Iacob David Abraham Adam Abel Iames 1. Romans 2. The Argument retorted upon the Adversaries Iames 2. The words of Christ are considered Matth. 7. A good Conscience and Faith unfeigned 1 Tim. 1. Ex Andrad Vega. Mat. 25. A bad Consequence 1. Timoth. A good Conscience and Faith unfeigned 2. Iames. Let him ask in Faith not wavering Mat. 14. O thou of little Faith wherefore didst thou doubt 3. Ephes. 4. One God one Faith 4. Habbac The Iust lives by Faith 5. Mat. 15. O Woman great is thy Faith c. 6. Mat. 14. Luk. 17. If ye have Faith as a grain of Mustard Seed 7. Iames. 3. Faith without Works is dead c. 8. Coloss. 2. The confirmation of Faith 9. Ephes. Taking the Shield of Faith Act. 10. 2 Cor. 5. Rom. 10. The inevitable severity of Iudgment should stir us up to care watchfulness Ioh. 5. Coloss. 3. As we are Workers but as we are Believers Rom. 4. Habbac Ioh. 17. A Fillacious Sophismfrom the concrete to the abstract A Fallacy Mercy forgiving Evil deeds Imputation puttidg a great value upon finall things The Iudgment of God is twofold according to Aug. de confut Evang. lib. 2. cap. 30. The Iudgment of damnation the Iudgment of discretion The Righteousness of condemnation The Mercy of separation A twofold kind of sinners Romans 8. Who are liable to the Iudgment of Condemnation The Rule of Right Iohn 5. Luke 21. Why the day of Iudgment is called a day of Redemption The Saints shall judge the World Pit Canis in opere Catechistico de Iudicio cap. 3. Psalm 142. Iob 31. It is incident to the greatest Saints to be in donbt sometimes concerning their spiritual graces and to be afraid of their sins Romans 8. Galat. 4. Philip. 1. Apoc. 22. 2 Tim. 4. For them that love his appearance Iohn 5. Of the wedding garment Answ. Rom. 13. Galat. 3. Apoc. 7. The Parable of the Marriage and Marriage-Garment considered and explained Isa. 25. The Marriage of the Lamb of God with his Bride The Guests of the Marriage The Guests of the Marriage Feast Luk. 14. Who are the Blind and the Lame that are invited to the Marriage Rom. 9. Against the Righteousness of Works The Wedding-garment Philip. 3. Agreeableness should be every where observed according to the circumstances of places times and things The Kingdom of the Law and the Kingdom of the Gospel The difference between the Law and the Gospel What the wedding garment signifies Matthew 5. The sense of thatScripture I came not to destroy the Law but to fulfil it A twofold Office of Christ the Mediatour The Errour of those who take Christ for theirLawgiver Christ is not a Law-giver but a Redeemer Christ is one way under the Law and we that are in Christ another way Andr. Vega de Iustif. pag. 741. The glorious resemblance between the Bread of the Sacrament and the Lords Passion Isa. 25. Iohn 6. Iohn 6. Iohn 2. 38. Luke 8. Matth. 4. Iohn 17. Romans 9. Repentance doth not make a Sinner perfect but evidences what he is The material of Repentance Heb. 9. How far the Promises reach and to whom they belong What Faith does and what Repentance August de 〈◊〉 gratia cap. 7. To come to Christ is to believe in him for he himself says No Man cometh to me unless it be given him of my Father Andrad Vega de Iust. 2. p. 741. A twofold necessity 1. Absolute 2. In respect of Consequencee How are good Works are necessary to Salvation Paul was a Zealous Exhorter to a Holy Life Necessity of Consequence Tit. 2. Rom. 3. Ibid. Gal. 3. Rom. 11. Tit. 3. Eph. 2. 2 Tim. 1. Rom. 9. 〈◊〉 Rom. 3. now he demonstrates that Faith only hath in it self the Power of justifying Oecumen photi in Cap. Rom. 3. only believing Origen Cap. 3. The only just cause of Glorying is in the Cross of Christ. August de verb. domini Serm. 4. He would have this one thing imputed whereby the others are gathered by Consequence Amb. 1 Cor. 1 It is appointed by God that a Believer should be justified by Faith only Chrysost. Serm. 5. in Cap. 2. Eph. Paul professes him to be Blessed who is supported by Faith only Basil. de humil by Faith only which is in Christ. Hierom. in Epist. ad Gal. cap. 1.