there contained and the benefit and good that foloweth of it we receive upon tradition though the thing it selfe we receive not for tradition Of this sort is the Baptisme of Infants which may be named a Tradition because it is not expressely delivered in Scripture that the Apostles did Baptize Infants nor any expresse precept there found that they should so doe yet is not this so received by bare and naked tradition but that we finde the Scripture to deliver unto us the ground of it Bellarmine and Maldonate both doe confesse that the Baptisme of Infants may be proved by the Scripture and therefore Maldonate concludes nobis verò traditio non est Bellarmine * as Whitaker shewes contradicts himselfe for first he saith that the Baptisme of Infants is an unwritten tradition and after that the Catholicks can prove Baptisme of Infants from the Scriptures To this head we may referre the observation of the Lords day the precept whereof is not found in Scripture though the practise be And if for that cause any shall name it a Tradition we will not contend about the word if he grant withall that the example Apostolicall hath the force of a Law as implying a common equity concerning us no lesse then it did them If any man shall call the summary comprehension of the chief heads of Christian doctrine contained in the Creed commonly called the Apostles Creed a tradition we will not contend about it For although every part thereof be contained in Scripture yet the orderly connexion distinct explication of those principall Articles gathered into an Epitome wherein are implyed and whence are inferred all conclusions Theologicall is an Act humane not divine and in that sense may be called a Tradition But let it be noted withall that we admit it not to have that credit as now it hath to be the rule of faith for this is the priviledge of holy Scripture The Creed it selfe was gathered out of Scripture and is to be expounded by the Scripture therefore it is not given to be a perfect Canon of faith and manners By Tradition is noted 1. Whatsoever is delivered by men divinely inspired and immediately called whether it be by lively voyce or by writing 2. In speciall it notes the word of God committed to writing 1 Cor. 15. 3. 3. It signifies rites expressely contained in writing Act. 6. 14. 4. It betokens that which is not committed to writing but onely delivered by lively voyce of the Apostles 5. It signifieth that which is invented and delivered by men not immediately called In Scripture Tradition is taken 1. in good part for any rite or doctrine of God delivered to his Church either by word or writing whether it concern faith and good works or the externall government of the Church 2 Thess. 2. 15. 1 Cor. 11. 15. 23. 2. In ill part it noteth the vaine idle and unwarrantable inventions of men whether Doctrine or Rites Matthew 15. 3. Marke 7. 8 9. When the Fathers speake reverently of Traditions by the word Tradition either they understand the holy Scripture which also is a Tradition it is a Doctrine left unto us Or by Traditions they understand observations touching Ecclesiastill policy D. Moulin Reasons confirming the sufficiency of Scripture against Popish traditions 1. The whole Church is founded upon the Doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles which were not true if any doctrin was necessary to salvation not revealed by the Prophets and Apostles 2. The Prophets and Christ and his Apostles condemne Traditions Esay 29. 13. Mathew 15. 3. 6. Col. 2. 8. Therefore they are not to be received Christ opposeth the Commandement and Scriptures to Traditions therefore he condemnes Traditions not written If the Jewes might not adde to the Bookes of Moses then much lesse may wee adde to the Canon of Scripture so much increased since 3. Those things which proceede from the will of God onely can be made knowne to us no other way but by the Revelation of the Scripture all Articles of Faith and Precepts of Manners concerning substance of Religion proceede from the Will of God onely Mathew 16. 17. 1 Cor. 2. 9 10 11. Gal. 1. 8. As in this place the Apostle would have nothing received besides that which he Preached so 1 Cor. 4. 6. He will have nothing admitted above or more then that which is written See Act. 26. 22. John 20. ult whence it is manifest that all necessary things may be found in Scripture since full and perfect Faith ariseth from thence which eternall salvation followeth Bellarmin saith John speakes onely of the miracles of Christ that hee wrote not all because those sufficed to perswade the World that Christ was the Sonne of God Those words indeede in the 30 Verse are to be understood of Christs Miracles but those in the 31. Verse rather are to be generally interpreted for the History onely of the Miracles sufficeth not to obtaine Faith or Life The question betwixt the Papists and us is de ipsa doctrina tradita non de tradendi modo touching the substance of the Doctrine delivered not of the manner of delivering it and of Doctrine delivered as the Word of God not of Rites and Ceremonies They maintaine that there bee doctrinall Traditions or Traditions containing Articles of Faith and substantiall matters of Divine worship and Religion not found in the holy Scriptures viz. Purgatory Invocation of Saints Adoration of Images Papall Monarchy Bellarmin and before him Peresius distinguisheth Traditions both from the authours and the matter From the Authours into Divine Apostolicall and Ecclesiasticall From the matter into those which are concerning Faith and concerning Manners into perpetuall and temporall universall and particular necessary and free Divine Traditions that is Doctrines of Faith and of the worship and service of God any of which we deny to be but what are comprised in the written Word of God Apostolike Traditions say they are such Ordinances as the Apostles prescribed for ceremony and usage in the Church as the observation of the memoriall of the Nativity Death and Resurrection of Christ the alteration of the seventh day from the Jewes Sabbath to the day of Christs Resurrection Ecclesiasticall ancient Customes which by degrees through the Peoples consent obtained the force of a Law Traditions concerning Faith as the perpetuall Virginity of Mary the Mother of Christ and that there are onely foure Gospels of Manners as the signe of the Crosse made in the forehead Fasts and Feastings to be observed on cetaine dayes Perpetuall which are to bee kept to the end of the World Temporall for a certaine time as the observation of certaine legall Ceremonies even to the â—ull publishing of the Gospell Universall Traditions which are delivered to the whole Church to be kept as the observation of Easter Whitsontide and other great Feasts Particular which is delivered to one or more Churches as in the
the Gospell doth declare evidently that he taught nothing but that which is contained in Scripture seeing the Apostle defineth the Gospell which he preached to be that which is contained in the Scriptures Fifthly That the Thessalonians had some part of Christian doctrine delivered by word of mouth that is by the Apostles preaching at such time as he did write unto them and some part by his Epistles the Text enforceth us to grant But that the Church at this day or ever since the Testament was written had any Tradition by word of mouth necessary to salvation which was not contained in the Old and New Testament we will never grant The Papists doe commonly abuse the name of Tradition which signiâ—ieth properly a delivery or a thing delivered for such a matter as is delivered onely by word of mouth and so received from hand to hand that is never put in writing but hath his credit without the Holy Scripture of God as the Jewes had their Cabala and the Scribes and the Pharisees their Traditions besides the Law of God For the justifying of our translation it is true that we alter according to the circumstances of the place especially considering that the word Tradition which of it selfe is indifferent as well to that which is written as to that which is not written hath been of us and them appropriated to note forth onely unwritten constitutions therefore we must needs avoide in such places as this the word Traditions though our last translation useth it where the simple might be deceived to thinke that the Holy Ghost did over commend any such to the Church which he would not have committed to writing in the holy Scriptures and in stead of the word so commonly taken although it doe not necessarily signifie any such matter we doe use such words as doe truly expresse the Apostles meaning and the Greeke word doth also signifie therefore we use these words Ordinances or Instructions Institutions or the doctrine delivered all which being of one or neere sence the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth signifie and the same doth Tradition signifie if it be rightly understood Ob. 1 Tim. 6. 20. O Timothy keep that which is committed to thy trust By the name of pledge saith Bellarmine not the Scripture but the treasure of unwritten doctrine is understood Depositum say the Rhemisis is the whole doctrine of Christianity being taught by the Apostles and delivered their successors Sol. Though other learned men interprete this pledge or gage to be the gift of the holy Ghost yet we willingly acknowledge that it is to be understood of the doctrine of Christianity as that which hath best ground both by circumstance of this and conferrence of other places Whence we inferre that the doctrine of truth is not the Churches dâ—crees but the Lords given to the Church to keepe onely wherewith the title of a pledge cannot stand unlesse one may lay to pledge a thing in his own hands since in Popery the Church her selfe maketh the doctrine which her selfe taketh to pledge Herein they handle it like a pledge that they lock it up fast where the people of God for whose use it is given to be kept cannot come unto it What had become of the Law of God if others had not been more faithfull keepers of it then the Priests to whom the principall Copy thereof written with the singer of God himselfe was committed There are some points of faith not contained in Scripture neither in the Old nor New Testament therefore it is not perfect In the old Testament no doubt but the females had some remedy whereby they might be purged from originall sin as well as the males circumcision was instituted only for the males the Scripture mentions not what was instituted for the females In the new Testament the perpetuall virginity of Mary the mother of Christ. Two things are considered in circumcision 1. Signum 2. Res signata or the end and use of the signe Sol. The thing signified or efficacie of the outward signe of circumcision was common both to Males and Females the very institution of circumcision teacheth that for it was a signe of the Covenant the Covenant belonged to all which were of the seed of Abraham if they renounced it not Although there were no decision of the other point out of the Scripture yet would it not thence â—ollow which the Jesuits pretend that some necessary point of Christianity wanted the ground of holy Scripture it being sufficient for us to know that she was a Virgin when our Saviour Christ was borne of her as the Prophets did foretell Yet as Chamier saith well we beleeve that she continued a Virgin all her life time for in those things saith he which are not properly de fide we hold the authority of the Church is great if it contradict not Scripture or produce no other absurdity Vide Riveti Apologiam pro virgine Maria l. 1. c. 15. Helvidius would gather from those words 1 Matth. 25. untill and first borne that Mary after had Children by her husband The word till doth not import so much See Gen. 8. 7. and 28. 15. 1 Sam. 15. 35. 2 Sam. 6. 23. Matth. 28. 20. He is called the first borne in Scripture which first opens the wombe whether other follow or no. 7. The Scripture is plaine and Perspicuous The Perspicuity of the Scripture is a cleare and evident manifestation of the truth delivered in it It is Perspicuous both in respect of it selfe and us 1. In respect of it selfe as appeares 1. In the things delivered which although they seeme obscure for their Maâ—esty and dignity yet they carry the light of truth before them therefore the Scripture is frequently termed a light Psal. 19. 8. and 119. 105. Deut. 30. 11. Prov. 6. 2. 2 Pet. 1. 19. 2 Cor. 4. 3. 4. 6. the Scripture is a most bright light There are 2 things in Gods revealed will verbum rei the word and res verbi the mystery The Scriptures are hard if we looke to the mystery but not if wee looke to the word as for example the Scripture teacheth that there is one God in three persons the words are plaine and easie every man understands them but the mystery contained in those words passeth the reach of man we may well discerne these things to be so though we cannot fully conceive how these should be so 2. In the manner of delivering or kind of stile which is fitted to the things and persons shewing the greatest simplicity both in words either proper or figurative and in the cleare sence and mosâ— perspicuous propriety of signification viz. that one which is called literall and Grammaticall 2. In respect of us because the Scripture is to us the principle meanes and inâ—â—rument of faith every Principle ought to be by it selfe and in its own nature knowne and most Intelligible and there being 3 degrees of
Pastor in the Old Testament had such authority much more the chiefe Priest in the New Sol. This one pastor signifieth neither the High Priest in the old Law nor the Pope in the New but Jesus Christ the High Shepheard for our soules Ob. Matth. 16. 19. Christ saith to Peter to theâ— will I give the Keyes of the Kingdome of Heaven therefore the Pope hath authority to expound Scripture Sol. First by the Keyes here is meant Commission to preach the Gospell not authority of interpreting the Scriptures When the Gospell is preached the Kingdome of heaven is opened to the beleevers and shut to the unbeleevers 2. That authority of the Keyes was not committed to Peter onely but to the other Apostles also Matth. 28. 18. 19. There is a twofold judgement 1. Of discretion 1 Cor. 10. 15. 2. Of authority as the Parllament judgeth Capitall crimes If the Papists understand the word Judge to â—ignifie Discerning as when we judge of meates by the taste every faithfull person ought to pray unto God for grace to judge to discerne and to know the true sense of the Scripture But if by judging they understand to pronounce decrees definitive and infallible judgements touching the sence of the Scriptures thereby to bind other mens consciences there is no man in the world that hath that power See Moulinâ— Buckler of Faith We have a more compendious way to come to the understanding of the Scripture It were too long when we doubt of any place to stay till we have the generall consent of the Pastors of the Church or to expect a generall counsell or to goe up to Rome But the word of God is amongst us the Scriptures themselves and the Spirit of God opening our hearts doe teach us how to understand them And yet we say not as the Papists falsely charge us that we allow every private mans interpretation of Scripture refusing the judgement of the Pastors of the Church Panoruitan saith the opinion of one godly man ought to be preferred before the Popes if it be grounded upon better authority of the Old and New Testament 2 Pet. 1. 20. No prophesie of the Scripture is of any private interpretation Stapleton saith interpretation is private either ratione personae when the man is private or ratione medij when it is not taken out of the context and circumstances or ratione finis when it is for a false end Now private interpretation in regard of the person if it be publike in regard of the meanes is not forbidden for it is lawfull for one man with Scripture toti resistere mundo saith the Glosse of the Canon-Law the meaning of this place is that the Prophets were no Interpreters or Messengers of their own minds but Gods The Catholickes hold saith Chamier meaning still by that Title the Protestants that the Scripture is to be interpreted by private labour and industry viz. of Augustine Jerome Chrysostome but not in a private sense that is in a sense arising from the braine of the Interpreter It is true saith Cartwright against the Rhemists that the Scriptures cannot be expounded of every private Spirit nor which is more of any private spirit nor yet of all private spirits together but onely of those which are inspired of God viz. the Prophets and Apostles which are here opposed unto private Interpretation And therefore it is evident that the exposition of the Scripture ought not to be fetched from Ecclesiasticall either Fathers or Councels which speake not by inspiration but from the Scriptures themselves what he meaneth he declareth in the next verse where he sheweth the reason of his saying namely that it must be interpreted as it was written and by as high authority Seeing therefore it was first spoken by holy men which spake as they were led by the holy Spirit and were inspired of God it followeth that it must be interpreted by the same authority The interpretation therefore that is brought but of the Apostles and Prophets is not private although it be avowed by one man onely On the other side that interpretation which is not brought from thence although it have the allowance of whole Generall Counsels is but private This is a principall meaning of our Saviour Christ when he willeth that we should call no man father or Master in the earth that is in matter of doctrine we should depend upon the authority of no man nor of all men in the earth but onely upon Christ and upon God Our reasons by which we prove that the chiefest judgement and authority of interpreting Scriptures is to be given not to the Church but to the Scriptures themselves and the Holy Ghost 1. That which onely hath power to beget faith that onely hath the chiefest authority of interpreting Scripture and of determining all controversies concerning faith and religion but the Scriptures onely and the Holy Ghost have this force Rom. 10. 17. the Holy Ghost onely can infuse saving faith into our hearts which is called by the Schoolemen infusa fides The faith which we have from the Church is acquired and sufficeth not to a certaine perswasion 2. The Scriptures cannot be interpreted but by the same Spirit wherewith they were written that spirit is found no where but in the Scripture whosoever have promises from God to understand the Scripture may interpret it but so have all the faithfull 3. Christ himselfe makes the Scripture a Judge John 12. 48. and still appealed to it 4. Although the Fathers were men indued of God with excellent gifts and brought no small light to understanding of the Scriptures yet learned men in our dayes may give a right sense of sundry places thereof which the Fathers saw not yea against the which perhaps they consent Hath any man living read all the Fathers nay have all the men living read them nay can they shew them can they get them I had almost said can they name them In the exposition of those words Tu es Petrus supra hanc petram almost every one of the Fathers at least the most part of them and the best expound it of Peters faith yet the Papists understand it non de fide sed de persona Petri. Here they dis-agree themselves from the Fathers John 10. 16. by the title of one Shepheard Augustine Chrysostome Jerome Cyrill Theodoret Theophylact Euthimius Rupertus Cyprian and other Fathers agree that Christ is there designed but Stapleton saith the Pope is there meant In the division of the Law they goe cleane contrary to the greatest part of the Fathers For they divide the Commandements as we doe but the Papists make the two first one and the tenth two 2. They have no Father to countenance them in this but Augustine There were no writings of the Fathers for a time many of them wrote 400 yeares after Christ but some 500 and 600 yeares after Christ what rule had they before that time of interpreting
Scriptures The Fathers were given too much to allegorizing Cajetane therefore in the Preface of his Commentaries upon the Books of Moses saith that the exposition of the Scripture is not tied by God to the sense of the Fathers therefore he admonisheth his readers not to take it ill if he somtime dissent from the stream of the Fathers 4. The doctrine of the Church must be examined by the Scriptures Act. 17. 11. If Pauls doctrine much more may the decrees of the Pope Church Councels be examined by the Scriptures 5. The interpretation of the Scripture is a gift freely given by God for the edification of the Church Rom. 12. 6. 1 Cor. 12. 10. therefore it is not tied to a certaine kinde of men but common to the faithfull 6. The faithfull are commanded diligently to try and examine every doctrine 1 Thess. 5. 21. 1 John 4. 1. which cannot be altogether done without interpretation 3. What meanes must be used in the interpretation of Scripture The end of the Scripture we heard was to direct the Church to all saving truth The meanes to be used for the attaining of that end by the Minister is diligent Study and humble Prayer by the people attentive reading hearing Prayer and meditating First the teachers must Pray earnestly to God for his spirit to inlighten them Matth. 7. 7. 8 9. Rom. 15. The Scriptures are understood by that spirit that dictated them Secondly The Pastors and teachers of the Church must diligently and painefully study the Scriptures giving themselves to read compare place with place John 5. 39. search the Scriptures it is a metaphore taken from such as search for Gold and Silver Oare in the earth who will search and sift and breake every clod to finde out the Gold Salomon useth the same metaphore Prov. 2. 4. and to this diligence in searching doth the Apostle exhort Timothy 1 Tim. 4. 13. This diligence is often exprest in Scripture in the old Testament by the phrase of meditating in the word Josh. 1. 8. Psal. 1. 2. Thirdly they must labour for a competent knowledge in the originall tongues the Hebrew and Greek in which the Scripture was written that so they may consult with the Hebrew Text in the old and the Greeke in the new Testament and see with their owne not anothers eyes 4. They should likewise be expert in all the liberall Arts especially in Grammer Logicke Rhetoricke generall Philosophy and History All the Treasures of wisedome and knowledge are hid in the Scriptures the treasures of naturall Philosophy in Genesis of Morall Philosophie in Exodus Deuteronomy and Ecclesiastes of the Politicks in the Judicials of Moses and the Proverbs of Solomon of Poetry in the Psalms of History in the Books of Chronicles Judges and Kings the Mathematickes in the dimensions of the Arke of the Temple of the Metaphysicks in the Books of the Prophets and Apocalyps 5. They must consider 1. The severall words 2. The Phrases In the severall words they must consider 1. Whether the word be taken properly or tropically and that they may the better understand the words an inspection 1. Of Lexicons is needfull some of which observed the order of the Alphabet but so as they distinguished betweene the roots and the Derivatives as Pagnine hath done for the Hebrew and Stephanus for the Greek The best Lexicons for understanding the Hebrew Text are Buxtorfe Avenarius Forster Schindler Mercer on Pagnine and Brixianus his arca Noae for the Greeke are Stephanus Budaeus Scapula my owne two I hope may be usefull for understanding both Testaments 2. Of Concordances some much extoll Buxtorfe for the Hebrew Kirchers is a very usefull one both for the Hebrew and the Septuagint Stephanus for the Greeke is the best Cottons Concordance as it is now inlarged by Newman is esteemed the best for the English See Dr. Featlies and Dr. Gouges Prefaces to it commending it and shewing the use of Concordances in generall They must 1. Consider the Text exactly in it selfe the Grammer of it must be sifted the nature of every word by it self and the alteration it admits in diversity of construction 2. The Rhetoricke whether any word leaving the proper signification receiveth a borrowed 3. Above all the Logicke as to know what he proveth and by what 2. Compare paralell places and obscurer with plainer To interprete that place this is my body make use of that other The Bread which we breake is the Communion of the body of Christ because both places are not onely concerning the Eucharist but also one and the same kind 3. Make use of Paraphrases and versions among which the Chaldee and the Septuagint for the Old Testament the Syriacke and the Arabicke for the new excell For the knowledge of the phrase they must proceed the same way and to understand the better both the words and phrases they must diligently consider of the scope and circumstances of the place as the coherence of that which went before with that which followes after and of the matter whereof it doth intreat All expositions ought to agree with the Analogie of faith Rom. 12. 6. Analogie is eitherof faith comprehended in the Doctrine of the Creed L. P. Command Sac. and gathered out of evident places of Scripture or of the Text by the coherence of antecedentia consequentia by the propriety of the phrase 6. The Jewish expositors the Ancient Fathers and other Interpreters Ancient and Moderne Popish and Protestant are usefull for the right understanding of the Scripture if they be read with judgement Not many but a few and those the best commentaries are to be consulted with of the Hebrew Interpretes and Rabbins two were most learned R. David Kimbi and Rabbi Aben Ezra saith Dr. Rainolds The pure Masters of the Hebrewes saith Mayerus in Philologia Sacra are specially Maymonides Rabbi David Kimchi wise Aben Ezra Rabbi Salomon Jarchi although the last two much favour Talmudicall dreames The Cabalists and many of the Rabbines are very fabulous and men in a burning fever cannot dreame of things more ridiculous then some of the Rabbines have seriously written and taught saith Muis against Morinus Vide Spanhem Dub. Evangel parte tertia Dub. 21. Dub 129. Glass Philol. Sac l. 2. partem primam Tract 1. Thalmud liber fabulosissimus Chamier Abarbanel hath done well of the greatest part of the Old Testament Scriptor famosissimus saith Buxtorfe of him in Decalogo Yet he was unknowne it seemes to Mercer and Drusius for neither of them mention him The Jewes say of Rabbi Moses Ben-Maymon that from Moses to Moses there arose not such a Moses He was the first of the Rabbines that ceased to doat Maimonides antiquus celeberrimus inter Judaeos Scriptor Capellus de Literis Ebr. Mr. Gregory stiles him the very learned Maimon The Church of God is much beholding to the Hebrew Rabbines being great helps unto us for understanding
foure Evangelists the Popes authority as Papists say being above the authority of the Councels it followeth that his authority is greater then the Evangelists then which what can be more blasphemously spoken We say the true interpretation of Scripture is not to be sought from generall Councels 1. Because even universall Councels have erred the Chalcedonian Councell one of the 4 so much magnified by Pope Gregory in rashly preferring the Constantinopolitane Church before that of Alexandria and Antioch Those that condemned Christ were then the universall visible Church Matth 26. 65. John 11. 47. See Act. 4. 18. 2. Generall councels have beene opposite one to another that of Constance to the other of Basill whereof one setteth downe that Councels could erre and so also the Pope and that a Councell was above the Pope the other affirmeth the quite contrary 3. There were no Generall Councels after the Apostles for 300 yeares till the first Councell of Nice when yet the Church had the true sence of the Scriptures 4. The generall Councels interpreted Scripture by Scripture as Athanasius and Ambrose teach concerning the first Councell of Nice 5. Because they cannot be so easily celebrated to declare any doubtfull sense of Scripture They have expounded but few places of Scripture neither is it likely the Pope will assemble them to expound the rest The Papists say that the Scripture ought to be expounded by the rule of faith and therefore not by Scripture onely But the rule of faith and Scripture is all one As the Scriptures are not of man but of the Spirit so their interpretation is not by man but of the Spirit likewise Let Councels Fathers Churches give their sense of the Scripture it 's private if it be not the sense and interpretation of the Spirit Let a private man give the true sense of the Scripture it 's not private because it 's Divine the sense of the Holy Ghost and private in 2 Pet. 1. 20. is not opposed to publike but to Divine and the words are to be read no Scripture is of a mans own interpretation that is private contrary to Divine The word is interpreted aright by declaring 1. The order 2. The summne or scope 3. The sense of the words which is done by framing a Rhetoricall and Logicall Analysis of the Text. In giving the sense three Rules are of principall use and necessity to be observed 1. The literall and largest sense of any words in Scripture must not be imbraced farther when our cleaving thereunto would breed some dis-agreement and contrariety between the present Scripture and some other Text or place else shall we change the Scripture into a Nose of wax 2. In case of such appearing dis-agreement the Holy Ghost leads us by the hand to seek out some distinction restriction limitation or figure for the reconcilement thereof and one of these will always fit the purpose for Gods word must alwayes bring perfect truth it cannot fight against it selfe 3. Such figurative sense limitation restriction or distinction must be sought out as the word of God affordeth either in the present place or some other and chiefely those that seeme to differ with the present Text being duly compared together The end of the first Booke THE SECOND BOOKE CHAPTER 1. OF GOD. HAving handled the Scripture which is principium Cognoscendi in Divinity I now proceed to Treate of God who is principium essendi or thus the Scripture is the rule of Divinity God and his workes are the matter or parts of Divinity This Doctrine is 1. Necessary 1. Because man was made for that end that he might rightly acknowledge and worship God love and honour him 2. It is the end of all divine Revelation John 5. 39. 3. To be Ignorant of God is a great misery being alienated from the life of God through the Ignorance that is in them 2. Profitable Our welfare and happinesse consists in the knowledge of God Jer. 9. 23. John 17. 3. the knowledge of God in the life to come is called the Beatificall vision 3. Difficult God being infinite and our understanding finite betwixt which two there is no proportion who knowes the things of God save the spirit of God A created understanding can no more comprehend God then a Viall-glasse can containe the waters of the Sea His wisdome is unsearchable Rom. 11. Job 11. 7. and 26. 13. Euclide answered very fitly to one asking many things concerning the Gods Coetera quidem nescio illud scio quod odêre curiosos Simonides being injoyned by Hiero to tell him what was God required a dayes time to be given him before he answered and at the end of that two when they were expired foure still doubling his time for inquiry till at the last being by Hiero asked a reason of his delayes he told him plainely that by how much the more he thought of God by so much the more he apprehended the impossibility of declaring what he was We know God per viam eminentiae negationis causationis 1. All perfections which we apprehend must be ascribed unto God and that after a more excellent manner then can be apprehended as that he is in himselfe by himselfe and of himselfe that he is one true good and holy 2. We must remove from him all imperfections whatsoever he is Simple Eternall Infinite Unchangeable 3. He is the Supream cause of all There is a threefold knowledge of God 1. An implanted knowledge which is in every mans conscience a naturall ingraffed principle about God O anima naturaliter Christiana said Tertullian 2. An acquired knowledge by the Creatures Psal. 19. 1. That is the great Booke in evey page whereof we may behold the Diety Praesentemque refert quaelibet herba Deum 3. Revealed knowledge of faith spoken of Heb. 11. 6. and this is onely sufficient to Salvation The Heathens had the knowledge of God in a confused manner Rom. 1. 19. 21. and 2. 14. a practicall knowledge 15. v. which shew the worke of the Law written in their hearts not the gracious writing promised in the Covenant the light of nature is not sufficient to bring man to Salvation onely in Judah is God known 76. Psal. 1. 2. and 147. 19. See Iâ—hn 14. 6. and 11. 27. Ephes. 2. 11. 12. The Heathen might know Gods nature and attributes that he was the Creator of the world that by his providence he did preserve and rule all things but they could not by the most industrious use of all natures helpes attaine unto any the least knowledge of God as he is mans Redeemer in Christ they knew not the truth as it is Jesus Ephes. 4. 21. In God we will consider 1. His Nature 2. His workes In his nature two things are considerable 1. That he is 2. What he is That God is is the most manifest cleare evident ungainsayable truth in the world It is the first verity
soule and body shall be perfectly united with God 3. How Divinity is to be taught In the generall it is to be handled methodically There is a great necessity of methode in Divinity that being usefull both to enlighten the understanding with the clearnesse of truth and to confirme the memory that it may more faithfully retaine things therefore in Divinity there will be a speciall need of art and orderly disposall of precepts because the mind is nowhere more obâ—use in conceiving nor the memory more weake in retaining There is a different way of handling Divinity according to the severall kinds of it Divinity is threefold 1. Succinct and briefe when Divine truth is summarily explained and confirmed by reasons and this Divinity is called Catecheticall Systematicall 2. Prolix and large when Theologicall matters are handled particularly and fully by definitions divisions arguments and answers this is called handling of Common places Scholasticall and controversall Divinity 3. Textuall which consists in a diligent meditation of the holy Scriptures the right understanding of which is the end of other instructions This againe is twofold either more Succinct and applied to the understanding of the learned as commentaries of Divinity or more diffuse and popular applied to the capacity and affections of the vulgar as Preaching which is called Patheticall Divinity and is especially usefull to correct the manners of men and stir up their affections 4. How Divinity is to be learned There is neede of a fowrefold minde to the study of it 1. Of a godly and heavenly minde most ardent Prayers in our learning being frequently powred out to God the fountaine of light and wisdome that dispelling the darknesse of ignorance and error he would deigne to illuminate our minds with the cleare knowledge of himselfe we can not acquire Divine wisdome as we doe the knowledge of other arts by our owne labour and industry it is a praise to learne humane arts of our selves here we must be taught of God 2. Of a sober minde that we may not be too curious in searching out the profound mysâ—eries of Religion as about the Trinity predestination we must be wise to sobriety and not busie our selves about perplexed and unprofitable questions being content to know such things which are revealed to us for our salvation 3. Of a sâ—udious and diligent minde other arts are not wont to be gotten without labour this being the Queene of arts requires therefore much paines both for its difficulty and excellency 4 Of an honest and good minde Luke 8 40. We must learne 1. with a deniall of our wit and carnall reason not measuring the unsearchable wisdome of God by our shallow capacities 2 with deniall of our wicked affections 1 Pet. 1. 2 3. 3 with a firme purpose of obedience Joh. 7. 17. Psal. 50. 23. Prov. 28. 28. 5. The things contrary to Diviniy are 1. Heathenisme being altogether ignorant of and refusing the true and saving knowledge of God 2. Epicurâ—isme scoffing at Divinity 3. Heresie depraving and corrupting Divinity 6. The excellency of Divine knowledge or the study of Divinity appeareth in these particulars 1. In the subject matter of it which is Divine either in its own nature as God and Christ Ps. 70 7. 1 Joh. 5. 46. or in relation to him as the Scripture Sacraments It is called the wisdome of God Prov. 2. 10. 3. 13. 1 Cor. 2. 6 7. and that wisdome which is from above Jam. 3. 17. If to know the nature of an Herbe or the Sun and Stars be excellent how much more to know the nature of God Aristotle held it a great matter to know but a little concerning the first mover and Intelligences Paul desired to know nothing but Christ and him crucified 1 Cor. 2. 2. That is he professed no other knowledge Si Christum discis satis est si caetera nescis Si Christum nescis nihil est si caetera discis The Metaphysicks handle not things properly divinely revealed but that which the Philosophers by the light of nature judged to be Divine 2. In the end the principall and maine end of Divinity is the glory of God that is the celebration or setting forth of Gods infinite excellency the secondary end is mans blessednesse John 17. 3. 3. In the certainty of it Gods Word is said to be sure and like Gold seven times refined there is no drosse of falsehood in it The Academicks thought every thing so uncertaine that they doubted of all things 4. In the cause of it these truths are such as cannot be known but by Gods revealing them to us all Scripture was given by Divine inspiration flesh and blood hath not revealed this to thee a humane light is enough to know other things 5. In the holines of it Psal. 19. 5. by them thy servant is forewarned 1 Tim. 3. 15. the Word of God is able to make us wise to salvation and to furnish to every good worke Christ makes this a cause of the errour and wickednesse in mans life that they doe not reade and understand the Scriptures 6. In the delight and sweetnesse of it Job 23. chap. 12 verse preferred the Word of God before his foode David before thousands of Gold and Silver before the honey and the honey combe Psal. 19. 10. 119. 103. and when he ceaseth to compare he beginneth to admire wonderfull are thy Testimonies Archimedes tooke great delight in the Mathematicks Austin refused to take delight in Tullies Hortensius because the name of Jesus Christ was not there Nomen Jesu non erat ibi 7. In that the Devill and Hereticks oppose it the Papists would not have the Bible translated nor Divine service performed in the vulgar Tongue TWo things are to be considered in Divinity 1. The rule of it the Scripture or word of God 2. The matter or parts of it concerning God and man Principium essendi in Divinity is God the first essence principium cognoscendi the Scripture by which we know God and all things concerning him I shall handle both these principles but begin with the Scripture as many Systematicall Writers do Of the Scripture It is necessary that the true Religion have a rule whereby it may be squared else there could be no certainty in it but there would be as many Religions as men It appeares by the light of nature the Heathen had known rules for their Rites Ceremonies and services the Turkes have their Alcoran the Jewes their Talmud the Papists their Decrees neither can any thing be a duty which hath not a rule God revealed himselfe divers wayes to the Fathers Heb. 1. The manner of revealing Gods will is threefold according to our three instruments of conceiving viz. Understanding Phantasie and senses to the understanding God revealed his will by ingraving it in the heart with his owne finger Jer. 31. 33. by Divine inspiration 2 Pet. 1. 21. 2 Chron.
Church 2. We grant that the Apostâ—es living and preaching and the Canon of the New Testament being not yet sealed their Gospell delivered viva voce was no lesse a rule of faith and worship then the writings of Moses and the Prophets 3. We doe not reject all the traditions of the Church for we embrace certaine Historicall and Ceremoniall ones but we deny that opinions of faith or precepts of worship can be confirmed by unwritten traditions 4. We call that an opinion of faith to speake properly and strictly when a Proposition is revealed by God which exceeds the capacity of nature and is propounded to be beleeved as necessary to be knowne to salvation Fundamentall opinions are those which by a usuall and proper name are called Articles of faith 5. What is not in respect of the matter an Article of saith may be a Proposition to be beleeved with a Theologicall faith if you looke to the manner of revealing as that the Sunne is a great light the Moone a lesse Gen. 1. 16. that Rachel was beautifull Leah bleare-eyed The Papists doe not cease to accuse the Scripture of imperfection and insufficiency as not containing all things necessary to salvation The Councell of Trent sess 4. decret 1. Saith that the truth and discipline is contained in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus The Papists generally divide the word of God into the word written and traditions They affirme that there are many things belonging to Christian faith which are neither contained in the Scriptures openly nor secretly This opinion is maintained by the Papists but it was not first invented by them The Jewish Fathers did use the traditions of the Elders and it hath been said of old Marke 7. 5. Matth. 5. 21. for their errours and superstitions yea at length they affirmed firmed that God gave to Moses in mount Sinai the Scripture and the Cabala or a double Law the one written the other unwritten The Tridentine Fathers session 4th doe command Traditions to be received with the same reverend affection and piety with which we embrace the Scripture and because one Bishop in the Councell of Trent refused this he was excluded In the meane space they explaine not what those traditions are which must be so regarded none of them would ever give us a list and Catalogue of those Ordinances which are to be defended by the authority of unwritten traditions not of the word committed to writing onely they affirme in generall whatsoever they teach or doe which is not in the Scripture that it is to be put into the number of Traditions unwritten The cause of it selfe is manifest that at their pleasure they might thrust what they would upon the Church under the name of Traditions Vide Whitak de Script controviae quaest Sexta c. 5. See also Moulins Buckler of Faith p. 51. Lindan the Papist was not ashamed to say that it had been better for the Church if there had been no Scripture at all but onely Traditions For saith he we may doe well enough with Traditions though we had no Scripture but could not doe well enough with Scripture though we had no Traditions Baldwin saith a Testament may be either scriptum or nuncupativum set downe in writing or uttered by word of mouth But a nuncupative Testament or Will made by word of mouth without writing must be proved by solemne witnesses The solemne witnesses of Christs Testament are the Prophets and Apostles Let Papists if they can prove by them that part of the Testament of Christ is unwritten Because our Adversaries doe contend for Traditions not written hotly and zealously against the totall perfection of the Scripture that they might thrust upon us many points by their owne confession not contained in Scripture and usurpe to themselves irrefragable authority in the Church it shall not be amisse largely to consider of this matter And 1. to enquire of the signification of the words Greek and Latine which are translated Tradition and then to come to the matter which is controverted between us and the Papists The Greeke word signifying Tradition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in the new Testament is used only in these places Matth. 15. 2. 3. 6. Marke 7. 3. 5. 8. 9. 13. 1 Cor. 11. 2. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 8. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and in the vulgar Latine is rendred Traditio Matth. 15. 2. 3. 6. Marke 7. 3. 5. 8. 9. 13. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 6. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and praecepta 1 Cor. 11. 2. Whereto the Rhemists translation which seemeth to be but a bare translation of the vulgar Latine doth wholly agree using the word Tradition every where excepting 1 Cor. 11. 2. where they use the word precepts but set in the margent the word Tradition Arias Montanus in his Interlineall translation doth render it traditio Beza doth commonly expresse it by the word traditio In the English Geneva Bible we translate it by the word instruction tradition calling mens precepts traditions the Apostles doctrine Ordinances or instructions not that we feared the word tradition but because we would not have the simple deceived as though the unwritten verities of the papists were thereby commended or as though we had some honourable conceite of them and what we did herein the signification of the word doth give us free liberty to doe in our last English Translation we use the word tradition as often as the vulgar Latine or the Rhemists have done not that we were driven by feare or shame to alter what was done before but because we would cut off all occasion of carping at our translation though never so unjust First we contend not about the name tradition the word may lawfully be used if the sense affixed thereto be lawfull 2. All traditions unwritten are not simply condemned by us 3. The Apostles delivered by lively voyce many observations dispensable and alterable according to the circumstances of time and persons appertaining to order and comelinesse onely we say that they were not of the substance of Religion that they were not generall concerning all Churches 4. We receive the number and names of the authors of Books Divine and Canonicall as delivered by tradition but the Divine truth of those Books is in it self clear and evident unto us not depending on the Churches authority The Books of Scripture have not their authority quoad nos from the approbation of the Church but winne credit of themselves and yeeld sufficient satisfaction to all men of their divine truth whence we judge the Church that receiveth them to be led by the Spirit of God yet the number authors and integrity of the parts of those Books we receive as delivered by tradition 5. The continued practise of such things as are neither expressely contained in Scripture nor the example of such practise expressely there delivered though the grounds reasons and cause of the necessity of such practise be
time of Austin fasting on the Sabbath day which was kept only at Rome Necessary Traditions which are delivered in the forme of a Precept that Easter is to bee celebrated on the Lords Day Free which are delivered in the forme of counsell as sprinkling of holy water Objection The Scripture it not perfect with a perfection of parts because many parts are either defective or excessive 1. Some labour wiâ—h a defect as Genesis 11. 12. a person is omitted in the Genealogy of Cainaan which was the Sonne of Aphâ—xad but it is reckoned in Luke in Christs Genealogy not in the old Testament therefore there is a defect Sol. Luke reckons it according to the vulgar opinion of the Jewes Junius in his paralels would have the fault to be in the Septuagint whom Luke followed not approving of their errour but yeelding to the time least the Gospell otherwise should have beene prejudicâ—d but Bezas opinion is rather to be approved of that this word is inserted from the Ignorance of those who undertooke to correct this Text according to the translation of the Seventy Interpreters For in an Ancient manuscript which Beza followed this word Cainaan was not to be found therefore he omitted it in his translation and so hath our great English Bible Ob. There is something found in the Scripture against the Commandement of God Deut. 4. 2. therefore there is excesse as well as defect for many Bookes which we beleeve to be Canonicall are added Sol. He doth not forbid adding by Gods Command but from the will of man for God himselfe added afterward The Papists arguments for Traditions answered Ob. Bellarmine saith Religion was preserved for 2000 yeares from Adam to Moses onely by Tradition therefore the Scripture is not simply necessary Sol. By the like reason I might argue that Religion was long preserved not onely without the Pope of Rome but also without Baptisme and the Lords Supper with the like institutions therefore they are not simply necessary yet none of ours hold the Scriptures simply necessary Secondly it is false that Religion was preserved all that while by ordinary Tradition onely for the living voyce of God sounded most perpetually in the Church and the doctrine of Religion was conveighed successivly from the Father to the Sonne which living voyce of God by little and little ceasing writing afterward succeeded and hath the same necessity now which Gods living voyce had before Ob. Whatsoever things are commended from Scripture are necessary but so are Traditions ergo they are necessary Joh 16. 12. I have yet many things to say unto you but ye cannot beare them now therefore say they the Lord spake many things which are not written Sol. 1. He saith not that he had many things to tell them which he had not taught them before but which they were not now so well capable of for it appeareth that he taught them that which they understood not and therefore they needed to be further taught of them by the holy Ghost which should not teach them any new thing that Christ had not taught but onely make them understand that which they had beene taught of our Saviour Christ. 2. If the holy Ghost did teach them any thing which our Saviour Christ had not before spoke unto them of yet that makes nothing for Traditions seeing that which the holy spirit taught them he taught them out of the Scriptures 3. If the holy Ghost should have taught the Apostles some things which neither Christ had told them of nor the Scriptures had taught them yet this is rather against the Papists For that which the holy Ghost taught them they undoubtedly left in record unto the Church as being faithfull Stewards and revealing the whole Counsell of God unto the people 4. It hath been the practise of Hereticks as Austine affirmeth at all times to cover their dreames and phantasies with this sentence of our Saviour Christ. Lastly if it be asked what were those grave and great mysteries which the Apostles could not for their rudenesse beare they are forsooth Oyle and Spittle in Baptisme Candles light at noone dayes which was not in the darker time of the Law Baptizing of Bels and such like gue-gaws as the grossest and carnallest men are fittest to receive Ob. 2 Thess. 2. 15. Therefore Brethren stand fast and hold the Traditions which ye have been taught whether by word or our Epistle From these words say our Adversaries it appeares that all things were not written nullum Papistae in Scripturis locum probabiliorem inveniunt saith Whitaker The Hereticks say the Rhemists on this place purposely guilefully and of ill conscience refraine in their translations from the Ecclesiasticall and most usuall word Tradition evermore when it is taken in good part though it expresse most exactly the signification of the Greeke word but when it â—oundeth in their fond fantasie againâ—â— the Traditions of the Church as indeed in true sense it never doth there they use it most gladly Here therefore and in the like plâ—ces that the reader may not so easily like of Traditions unwritten here commended by the Apostle they translate 〈◊〉 â—onstitutions Ordinances and what they can invent else to hide the truth from the Rimple or unwarry Reader whose translations have none other end but to be guile such by art and conveighance Thus farre the Rhemists Paul taught the Thessalonians some things by word of mouth which he taught them not in his two Epistles which he wrote unto them therefore he taught some doctrines which he wrote not as if that Paul wrote no more Epistles then these two whereby that which he taught not them in writing unto them he taught them by writing unto others Secondly how followeth this argument Paul wrote not all the doctrines of God unto the Thessalonians therefore they are not all written in the Propheticall and Evangelicall writings whereas it is plainly testified that the Old Testament containeth a perfect rule of the doctrine of salvation the new being written for a Declaration of the fulfilling and further clearing of that in the Old Testament Thirdly it appeareth manifestly in the Acts what was the summe of that which Paul taught the Thessalonians by word of mouth For there it is witnessed that Paul taught out of the Scriptures that it behoved Christ to suffer and rise againe from the dead and that Jesus was Christ this teaching then by word is there limited to the Scriptures of the Law and Prophets Neither ought it to seeme strange that this was the summe of all which the Apostle taught at Thessalonica where he tarried so small a while when amongst the Corinthians where he remained longest of any place and consequently taught most he sheweth that he taught nothing but Christ and him crucified Fourthly the Apostle himself in this very place calling verse 14. whatsoever he taught by word or wrote by the name of
mystery of the Trinity is necessary to be known and believed of all that shal be saved it was not so plainly revealed to the Jewes of old as it is to us in the new Testament a perfect and full knowledge of this mystery is not attainable in this life Although Trinity in its native signification signifie the number of any three things yet by Ecclesiasticall custome it is limited to signifie the three Persons in the Trinity This is not meant as if the Essence did consist of three Persons as so many parts and therefore there is a great difference between Trinity and Triplicity Trinity is when the same Essence hath divers waies of subsisting and Triplicity is when one thing is compounded of three as parts they are three not in respect of Essence or Divine attributes three Eternals but three in respect of personall properties as the Father is of none the Sonne of the Father and the holy Ghost of both three Persons but one God as to be to be true to be good are all one because Transcendents Opera Trinitatis ad extra sunt indivisa the outward workes which concerne the creature belong to one person as wel as the other as to create govern but opera ad intra sunt divisa the personall properties or internall workes are distinguished as the Father begets the Sonne is begotten of the Father and the holy Ghost proceeds from the Father and the Sonne There is in the Trinity alius alius another and another but not aliud aliud another thing and another thing as there is in Christ the Father is another person from the Sonne but yet there is the same nature and Essence of them all They differ not in their natures as three men or three Angels differ for they differ so as one may be without the other but now the Father is not without the Sonne nor the Sonne without the Father so that there is the same numericall Essence The Father in some sence is said to be the onely God John 17. 3. that is besides the Divine nature which is common to the three persons there is not another God to be found the word alone is opposed to all faigned Gods to every thing which is not of this Divine nature so when it is said None knoweth the Father but the Sonne and the Sonne but the Father that excludes not the Holy Ghost which searcheth the hidden things of God but all which are not of that Essence Though there be no inequality in the persons yet there is an order not of dignity but of beginning The Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost made the world not as if there were so many partiall causes much lesse as if God the Father were the Principall and these Instrumentall but onely meere order Persona divina est essentiae divinae subsistentia incommunicablis Wendelinus The Essence considered with the manner of subsisting is called a Person A Person is such a subsistence in the Divine nature as is distinguished from every other thing by some speciall or personall property or else it is the God-head restrained with his personall property Or it is a different manner of subsisting in the Godhead as the nature of man doth diversly subsist in Peter JAmes John but these are not all one It differs from the essence as the manner of the thing from the thing it selfe and not as one thing from another one person is distinguisht from another by its personall property and by its manner of working The personall property of the Father is to beget that is not to multiply his substance by production but to communicate his substance to the same The Sonne is said to be begotten that is to have the whole substance from the Father by communication The Holy ghost is said to proceed or to be breathed forth to receive his substance by proceeding from the Father and the Sonne joyntly in regard of which he is called the Spirit of the Father and the Spirit of the Sonne both Gal. 4. 6. The Father onely begetteth the Sonne onely is begotten and the holy Ghost onely proceedeth both procession and generation are ineffable In the manner of working they differ for the Father worketh of himselfe by the Sonne and through the holy Ghost the Sonne worketh from the Father by the Holy Ghost the holy Ghost worketh from the Father and the Sonne by himselfe There is so one God as that there are three persons or divers manners of being in that one Godhead the Father Sonne and the holy Ghost 1 Whatsoever absolutely agrees to the Divine nature that doth agree likewise to every person of the Trinity 2 Every person hath not a part but the whole Deity in it selfe A person is one entire distinct subsistence having life understanding will and power by which he is in continuall operation These things are required to a person 1 That it be a substance for accidents are not persons they inhere in another thing a person must subsist 2 A lively and intelligent substance endued with reason and will an house is not a person nor a stone or beast 3 Determinate and singular for mankind is not a person but John and Peter 4 Incommunicable it can not be given to another hence the nature of man is not a person because it is communicable to every particular man but every particular man is a person because that nature which he hath in particular can not be communirated to another 5 Not sustained by another therefore the humane nature of Christ is not a person because it is sustained by his Deity 6 It must not be the part of another therefore the reasonable soule which is a part of man is not a person That there are three persons in the Deity viz. Father Sonne and holy Ghost is manifest by expresse testimonies of Scripture Genes 1. 1. Gods created and v. 26. Psalm 33. 6. there three are named the Word the Lord and the Spirit Esay 6.3 Holy Holy Holy But this truth is most clearly taught in the new Testament Matth. 3. 16. Luke 3. 22. The first person in the Trinity utters his voice from Heaven This is my beloved Sonne the Sonne is baptized in Jordan the holy Ghost descends in the shape of a Dove upon Christ. Pater auditur in voce Filius manifestatur in homine Spiritus Sanctus dignoscitur in columba Aug. tract 6. in Joh. Adde to this the History of Christs transfiguration described Matth. 17. 5. Marke 9. 7. Luke 9. 35. In which likewise the voice of the Father was heard from Heaven This is my beloved Sonne the Sonne is transfigured the Holy Ghost manifests himselfe in a bright cloud Matth. 28. 19. The Apostles are commanded to baptize in the Name of Father Sonne and holy Ghost Cameron thinks that is the most evident place to prove the Trinity But that is as â—pposite a place as any for this purpose 1 John 5.
7. For there are â—hree that beare record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost The Arrians wiped this place out of many bookes 2 Cor. 13. 14. The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the communion of the holy Ghost be with you all The Arrians Samosatenians Sabellians Photinians and others deny the Trinity of persons in one essence of God Servetus a Spaniard was burnt at Geneva in Calvins time he denied that Christ was Gods Sonne till Mary bore him Servetus Trinitatem idolum item Cerberum Tricipitem vocabat See Mr Cbeynels rise of Socinianisme ch 1. p. 6. Socinus cals him Deum tripersonatum ridiculum humanae curiositatis inventum Infaustus Socinus omnium haereticorum audacissimus saith Rivet See Cheynels rise of Socinianisme Chap. 3. That the Father is God is confessed by all and it is manifest from Scripture we are directed to pray to him The Apostle saith Grace to you and peace from God our Father Philem. v. 3. That Christ is God is proved 1 By cleare Texts of Scripture affirming this truth in so many words The Prophet foretelling of him saith this in his name by which you shall call him Jehovah or the Lord our righteousnesse Jerem. 23. 6. and the mighty God Esay 9. 6. Paul saith Rom 9. 5. who is God over all blessed for ever and St John saith 1 John 5. 20. This is very God and St Paul saith 1 Tim. 3. 16. Great is the mystery of Godlinesse God manifested in the flesh and accordingly Thomas made his confession John 20. 28. My Lord and my God which title he accepteth and praiseth Thomas for believing and that he could not have done without extreame impiety had he not been God 2 By evident reasons drawn from the Scripture He hath the Name Titles Workes essentiall Attributes and worship of God ascribed unto him in Scripture 1 Divine Names and Titles are given to Christ He is the onely blessed Potentate 1 Tim. 6. 15. The King of Kings Revel 1. 5. and Lord of Lords Apoc. 17. 14. 19. 16. He is called the Image of the invisible God Col. 1. 25. the brightnesse of his glory Heb. 1. 3. the word and wisdome of the Father Prov. 8. 12. 9. 1. He is called the Word because he is so often spoken of and promised in the Scripture and is in a manner the whole subject of the Scripture he is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cum articulo John 1. 1. Acts 20. 28. 1 Tim. 3. 16. the great God Titus 2. 13. the true God 1 John 5. 20. God over all or blessed above all Rom. 9. 5. the most high Luke 1. 76. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by which name the Septuagint have expressed Jehovah the proper name of God alone John 20. 28. My Lord Jude 4. the onely Lord Acts 10. 36. the Lord of all 1 Cor. 15. 48. the Lord from Heaven 1 Cor. 2. 8. the Lord of glory 1 Cor. 2. 8. the Lord of Heaven and Earth Matth. 28. 18. These Titles are too high and excellent to be given unto any meere man whatsoever God therefore who wil not have his glory given to another would never have given these Titles to another if he were not God 2 The workes of God even the principall and most eminent of all which are proper to the Lord onely are ascribed to Christ. 1. The worke of Creation even of creating all things John 1. 3. and Col 1. 16. He for whom and by whom all things were created is very God for Christ and by him all things were created therefore he is very God 2 The worke of preservation and government is attributed to him also he is before all things and by him all things consist Heb. 1. 2. He who upholds all things by his powerfull word is God so doth Christ therefore he is God 3 The working of Divine miracles raising up the dead by his own power is given to him John 6. 54. and John 5. 21. He that can quicken and raise the dead is God so doth Christ therefore he is God 4 Redeeming of mankind Luke 1. 68. Matth. 20 28. Eph. 1. 7. Rev. 1. 5. 5 Sending of the Holy Ghost John 21. 22. 14. 16. and of Angels is ascribed to him Matth. 13. 41. Revel 1. 1. He forgives sinnes Marke 9. 2 5. He gives eternall life 3 The principall and incommunicable attributes of God are given to him 1 Omniscience John 2. 24 25. He knew all men and he knew what was in them John 21. 17. Lord thou knowest all things 2 Omnipotency Rev. 1. 8. Phil. 3. 21. 3 Eternity John 17. 5. Revel 1. 18. John 1. 1. Esay 9. 6. He is called the everlasting Father 4 Omnipresence Matth. 18. 20. 5 Unchangeablenesse Heb. 1. 11 13. 13. 8. He that is Omniscient Omnipotent Eternall Omnipresent Unchangeable equall to the Father in Majesty and glory Phil. 2. 16. is God so is Christ therefore he is God Laâ—â—ly worship due to God is ascribed to him Heb. 1. 6. Let all the Angels of God worship him Revel 5. 13. the Lambe that is Christ hath the same worship tendred to him that the Father hath We are commanded to call upon his name to believe and trust in him John 14. 1. 3. 16. 6. 39. to hope in him Esay 11. 10. we are baptized in his name Matth. 28. 19. Acts 8. 16. and sweare by him Rom. 9. 1. Ob. Christ is called God of God and light of light Sol. Christ as God is from himself but if the Deity of Christ be considered as in the person of the Sonne so it is from the Father The Sonne in respect of his essence is from none in respect of the manner of subsistence he is from the Father Ob. Matth. 19. 17. Christ denieth that he was good because he was not God Sol. Christ applieth himselfe to him to whom he spake now he called Christ good in no other sence then he would have done any other Prophet and in this sense Christ rebuked him for calling him good Ob. John 17. 3. God the Father is called the onely true God Sol. Some referre both these to God himselfe and Christ but others give a generall rule that the word alone is not opposed to the other persons but to the creatures and feigned Gods and so John 8. 9 the woman is not excluded but her accusers the added expressions shew him to be God because it is life eternall to know him as well as the Father Ob. Ephes. 4. 6. Sol. The word Father is not there used relatively or personally for the first person in the Trinity but essentially as Mal. 2. is there not one Father of us all and so he is God called Father in regard of his workes ad extrâ—i Ob. John 14. 28. My Father is greater then I. Sol. As he was man onely or mediator the Father was greater then
or uttered which hath revealed the councels of God to men especially the elect that we may know the Father by the Sonne as it were by an Image John 1. 18. so also he is the externall wisdome instructing us us concerning the will and wisdome of the Father to salvation 1 Cor. 1. 21. and v. 30. 3 The Property of the Sonne in respect of the Holy Ghost is to send him out Iâ—hn 15 26. Hence arose the Schisme between the Westerne and the Easterne Churches they affirming the procession from the Father and the Sonne these from the Father alone To deny the procession of the holy Ghost from the Sonne is a grievous errour in Divinity and would have grated the foundation if the Greeke Church had so denied the procession of the Holy Ghost from the Sonne as that they they had made an inequality between the Persons But since their forme of speech is that the Holy Ghost proceedeth from the Father by the Sonne and is the Spirit of the Sonne without making any difference in the consubstantiality of the Persons it is a true though an erroneous Church in this particular divers learned men thinke that à Filio per Filium in the sense of the Greeke Church was but a question in modo loquendi in manner of speech and not fundamentall 3 The personall propriety of the holy Ghost is called procession or emanation John 15. 26. neither hath the word defined nor the Church known a formall difference between this procession and generation The third internall difference among the Persons is in the number for they are three subsisting truly distinctly and per se distinguished by their relations and properties for they are internall workes and different and incommunicably proper to every person There follows an externall distinction in respect of effects and operations which the persons exercise about externall objects namely the creatures for though the outward works are undivided in respect of the Essence yet in respect of the manner and determination all the persons in their manner and order concur to such workes As the manner is of existing so of working in the persons The Father is the originall and principle of action works from himselfe by the Sonne as by his Image and wisdome and by the holy Ghost But he is said to worke by his Sonne not as an instrumentall but as a principall cause distinguished in a certaine manner from himselfe as the Artificer workes by an Image of his worke framed in his mind which Image or Idea is not in the instrumentall cause of the worke but his hand To the Sonne is given the dispensation and administration of the action from the Father by the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 8. 6. John 1. 3. 5. 19. To the holy Ghost is given the consummation of the action which he effects from the Father and the Sonne Job 26. 13. 1 Cor. 12. 11. The effects or workes which are distinctly given to the Persons are Creation ascribed to the Father Redemption to the Sonne Sanctification to the holy Ghost all which things are done by the Persons equally and inseparably in respect of the effect it selfe but distinctly in respect of the manner of working The equality of the Persons may be proved 1. by the worke of Creation joyntly Psalm 33. 6. severally for the Father those places prove it 1 Cor. 8. 6. Heb. 1. 2. the Sonne John 1. 3 10. Col. 1. 16. the holy Ghost Job 33. 4. 2 By the worke of Redemption the Father sends and gives the Son the Son is sent and given by him the holy Ghost perfects the worke of conception and incarnation Luke 1. 35. 3 By the worke of Sanctification the Father sanctifieth John 17. 17. Jude v. 1. the Son Ephes. 5. 26. the holy Ghost 2 Thess. 2. 13. 1 Pet. 1. 2. 4 By the worship of religious adoration The Father is religiously adored often in the Scripture Ephes. 1. 17. the Sonne Acts 7. 59. Heb. 1. 6. the holy Ghost Acts 28. 25 26. Rom. 9. 1. This is a wonderfull mystery rather to be adored and admired then inquired into yet every one is bound to know it with an apprehensive knowledge though not with a comprehensive No man can be saved without the knowledge of the Father he hath not the Father who denieth the Sonne and he receives not the Holy Ghost who knowes him not John 14. 17. 2 We must worship the Unity in Trinity and Trinity in Unity as it is in Athanasius Creed We must worship God as one in substance and three in Persons as if Thomas John and Matthew had one singular soule and body common to them all and entirely possessed of every one we were baptized in the Name of Father Sonne and Holy Ghost 3 We should praise God for revealing this mystery to us in his word and be assured that what he promiseth or threatens shall be accomplished being confirmed by three witnesses The end of the Second Booke A Treatise of Divinitie The third Booke CHAP. I. Of Gods Workes HAving spoken of the Scripture and God the Workes of God in the next place are to bee handled which some make two the Decree and the Execution of the Decree others three Decree Creation Providence The Works of God whereby he moves himselfe to his Creatures are three Decree Creation Providence not three individually for so they are innumerable but in the species and kindes of things The Workes of God are 1. Before time or eternall his Decree 2. In time 1. Past Creation of all things 2. Present Gubernation and Susteâ—tation Government and Preservation Or thus Gods Workes are 1. Internall which are in the very will of God from eternity and they are called the Decrees of God by which God determined from eternitie what he would doe in time We follow the received Phrase of Divines when we call the Decrees the works of God and speake of God after our capacity Therefore we call Decrees of God his Works because the Decrees of man are Works or Actions from man and really distinct from his understanding and will by which we conceive the Decrees of God or rather God decreeing 2. Externall Creation and Providence 1. Of Gods Decree Decree is a speech taken from the affaires of men especially Princes in the determination of causes between parties at variance whose sentence is called a Decree or secondly it is a resolution of things consulted of either negatively or affirmatively according to the latter use of the Phrase it is applyed to God Esay 46. 10. Decretum in the Latine is indifferent to signifie either in the Abstract Gods Decree or in the Concrete a thing decreed Gods Absolute Decree is that whereby the Lord according to the Counsell of his owne Will hath determined with himselfe what he will doe command or forbid permit or hinder together with the circumstances of the same Acts 2. 23. and 4. 28. Luke 22. 22. John 7. 30. Or