saith Dr Twisse Bucer also was an excellent Divine He hath written a two-fold Exposition on all the Psalms one more large and Paraphrastical the other briefer and ad verbum Francis Iunius the very Oracle of Textual and Scholastical Divinity as Dr Hall cals him Epist. 7. Decad. 1. Vatablus his Annotations upon the Old Testament and Beza's on the New are commended by Zanchy in his Miscellanies But Arnoldus Boot in his Index Autorum before his Animadversiones Sacrae saith Robert Stephens and not Vatablus was the Author of those Scholia which are in Vatablus his Bible Doctus Vatablus prae caeteris quos adhuc videre contigit omnibus abstrusa quaequ◠in Psalmis explicuit partim suo sano judicio partim doctissimorum Hebraeorum testimonio quem etiam admirandus Calvinus studiose sequitur ferè ubique quasi à sententia Vatabli non tutum esset discedere Foord in Ps. 45. 1. Quid hac phrasi denotetur optimè exposuit D. Beza suis in Novum Testamentum nunquem satis laudatis notis Constantin L'Empereur in Dan. 2. 8. See more of him in Zanchies Epistles Amama Paulus Fagius Drusius Ludovicus Capellus Livelie Cameron Ludovicus de Dieu have been great Lights and by their skill in the Tongues have excellently interpreted Scripture Peter Martyr Lavater Musculus Zanchy Paraeus Rollock Rivet are sound Expositors Ex omnibus antiquis recentioribus medullam variarum interpretationum circa eos disceptationem collegit Willetus in hexaplis ad Genesin Exodum Leviticum Danielem Epistolam ad Romanos in libros Samuelis sibi dissimilis est compendio atque alia plane methodo commentatur optandum esset telam illam à Willeto tam foeliciter coeptam eadem methodo in reliquos Scripturae libros pertexi Voetius Biblioth Theol. lib. 1. cap. 14. 4. For Popish Expositors Aquinas is esteemed by the Papists as the Oracle of the Romish School whom for his profound learning and search into the mysteries of all Divinity they sirnamed Angelical He was the first thorow-Papist of name that ever wrote and with his rare gifts of wit learning and industry did set out Popery most Maximo altissimo ingenio vir cui ad plenam absolutamque totius tam divinae quam humanae eruditionis gloriam solus defuit linguarum eloquentiae usus quem eruditi istius saeculi utpote sublimioribus studiis intenti neglexere Sixtus Senensis Vide plura ibid. Luther on Gen. 9. chiefly commends Lyra for following the literal sense Nicolau◠Lyranus Vir tanta tamque pura vera germana Sacrae Scripturae scientia praeditiu ut in illa exponenda nullum habeat illius temporis parem Rainold de lib. Apoc. Tom. 1. praelect 21. Vide plura Tom. 1. praelect 42. He was a Jew converted Ex antiquioribus tanquam universales communes Commentatores habiti fuerunt Lyranus Glossa Voetius in Biblioth Theol. Jansenius eruditus moderatus Interpres Neque Pontificiorum quisquam doctius interpretatus est Evangelicam historiam Rainold de lib. Apoc. Tom. 2. Praelect 194. Cajetane went over all the Scripture saving the Canticles and Prophets which dying he left begun and the Revelation Quam de industria attingere noluit He was both a learned and moderate Papist as Chamier and Whitaker both shew He was chiefly intent on the literal sense and that according to the Hebrew truth of which Tongue he had little knowledge but had by him those that were skill'd in the Hebrew who would interpret ad verbum not onely exactly but superstitiously and often absurdly which often drew the like Expositions from the Cardinal Tostatus was admirable for his deep skill and almost incredible pains in interpreting holy Scripture There are now five Papists joyned together in several Volumes on the whole Scripture Immanuel Sa Estius Gagneius Tirinus and Menochius the last of which Grotius commends in his Preface to his Annotations on the Old Testament Estius doth excellently on all the Epistles The Commentaries of Immanuel Sa the Jesuite upon the Bible are shorter then the Text it self Familiam ducant inter Commentatores Jansenius Maldonatus Montac Analecta Exercit. 6. Sect. 4. Maldonate doth well on the Evangelists but was a most supercilious Writer and no marvel since he was for his Countrey a Spaniard and his Profession a Jesuite Masius hath written learnedly on Ioshua Quanta vir ille linguae Graecae sed praesertim Hebraicae Rabbinicae Syriacae cognitione fuerit imbutus nemini docto opinor incognitum Morinus lib. 1. exercitat 9. c. 6. exercit 1. c. 4. Andraeas Masius linguae Hebraicae Syriacae peritissimus atque in lectione Rabbinica egregiè exercitatus The Popish Postils are the burden of many Camels as Lipsius speaks of the Books of the Law and are sitly stiled by godly Divines Pigrorum pulvinaria Vide Zepperi Artem Habendi Andiendi conciones sacras lib. 1. cap. 4. pag. 38 39. c. Ministers to all the means formerly mentioned for the interpreting of Scripture must adde a conscionable practice of what they know and must in all humblenesse of minde seek the peoples edification The means to be used by the people to understand the Scripture and finde out the sense and meaning of it 1. If they be learned they may make use of most of the former means prescribed to Ministers 2. Such as are unskilfull and know not how to make use of those means are 1. Diligently to read the Scripture in which are to be considered 1. Antecedent Preparation that they come to the reading and study of the Scriptures with Prayers and greatest Reverence relying on the Divine Promises for the inlightening of their minds by the holy Ghost The Scripture may well be called The Revelation of Christ Rev. 1. 1. See Rev. 5. 5. 2. The Adjuncts of reading which are 1. Chiefest Attention in reading and a pious disposition and spiritual frame of the heart that they may not understand only but cordially affect what they understand 2. Application of all things to the Examination Correction and amendment of their own lives 3. Diligent Meditation 4. Conferring of it with others and catechizing 2. They ought to have recourse to those that are more skilfull then themselves and to consult with the best Commentaries and Expositions of the Scripture and reade them judiciously We teach concerning our Means that they all together do make a perfect way whereby we may finde the right sense of the Scripture Our Adversaries prescribe this method and course to be taken in expounding of Scripture which consists in four Rules The general Practice of the Church The Consonant Interpretation of the Fathers The Decrees of general Councels Lastly The Rule of Faith consisting partly of the Scriptures partly of Traditions unwritten In all these means the Pope is implicitely understood for the Rule of Faith is that which the
infallible ground there is none such of supernatural truth but the Scripture Because our Adversaries do contend for Traditions not written hotly and zealously against the total perfection of the Scripture that they might thrust upon us many points by their own confession not contained in Scripture and usurp to themselves irrefragable authority in the Church it shall not be amisse largely to consider of this matter And first to enquire of the signification of the words Greek and Latine which are translated Tradition and then to come to the matter which is controverted between us and the Papists The Greek word signifying Tradition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in the New Testament is used onely in these places Matth. 15. 2 3 6. Mark 7. 3 5 8 9 13. 1 Cor. 11. 2. Gal. 1. 14. Colos 2. 8. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and in the vulgar Latine is rendred Traditio Mat. 15. 2 3 6. Mark 7. 3 5 8 9 13. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 6. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and Praecepta 1 Cor. 11. 2. Whereto the Rhemists translation which seemeth to be but a bare translation of the Vulgar Latin doth wholly agree using the word Tradition every where excepting 1 Cor. 11. 2. where they use the word Pâ—ecepts but set in the margent the word Tradition Arias Montanus in his interlineal Translation doth render it Traditio Beza doth commonly express it by the word traditio In the English Geneva Bible we translate it by the word Instruction Tradition calling mens precepts Traditions the Apostles Doctrine Ordinances or Instructions not that we feared the word Tradition but because we would not have the simple deceived as though the unwritten verities of the Papists were thereby commended or as though we had some honourable conceit of them and what we did herein the signification of the word doth give us free liberty to do in our last English Translation we use the word Tradition as often as the Vulgar Latine or the Rhemists have done not that we were driven by fear or shame to alter what was done before but because we would cut off all occasion of carping at our Translation though never so unjust First We contend not about the name Tradition the word may lawfully be used if the sense affixed thereto be lawful 2. All Traditions unwritten are not simply condemned by us 3. The Apostles delivered by lively voice many observations dispensable and alterable according to the circumstances of time and persons appertaining to order and comelinesse only we say That they were not of the substance of Religion that they were not general concerning all Churches 4. We receive the number and names of the Authors of Books Divine and Canonical as delivered by tradition but the Divine Truth of those Books is in it self clear and evident unto us not depending on the Churches Authority The Books of Scripture have not their Authority quoad nos from the approbation of the Church but win credit of themselves and yield sufficient satisfaction to all men of their Divine Truth whence we judge the Church that receiveth them to be led by the Spirit of God yet the Number Authors and Integrity of the parts of those Books we receive as delivered by Tradition 5. The continued practice of such things as are neither expresly contained in Scripture nor the example of such practice expresly there delivered though the Grounds Reasons and cause of the necessity of such practice be there contained and the benefit and good that followeth of it we receive upon Tradition though the thing it self we receive not for Tradition Of this sort is the Baptism of Infants which may be named a Tradition because it is not expresly delivered in Scripture that the Apostles did baptize â—nfants nor any expresse precept there found that they should so do yet is not this so received by bare and naked Tradition but that we finde the Scripture to deliver unto us the ground of it Bellarmine and Maldonat both do confesse That the Baptism of Infants may be proved by the Scripture and therefore Maldonat concludes Nobis verò traditio non est Bellarmine as Whitaker shews contradicts himself for first he saith That the Baptism of Infants is an unwritten Tradition and after That the Catholicks can prove Baptism of Infants from the Scriptures To this head we may referre the observation of the Lords-day the precept whereof is not found in Scripture though the practice be And if for that cause any shall name it a Tradition we will not contend about the word if he grant withall that the example Apostolical hath the force of a Law as implying a common equity concerning us no lesse then it did them If any man shall call the summary comprehension of the chief heads of Christian Doctrine contained in the Creed commonly called The Apostles Creed a Tradition we will not contend about it For although every part thereof be contained in Scripture yet the orderly connexion and distinct explication of those principal Articles gathered into an Epitome wherein are implied and whence are inferred all Conclusions Theological is an Act humane not divine and in that sense may be called a Tradition But let it be noted withall that we admit it not to have that credit as now it hath to be the Rule of Faith for this is the priviledge of holy Scripture The Creed it self was gathered out of Scripture and is to be expounded by the Scripture therefore it is not given to be a perfect Canon of faith and manners By Tradition is noted 1. Whatsoever is delivered by men divinely inspired and immediately called whether it be by lively voice or by writing 2. In special it notes the word of God committed to writing 1 Cor. 15. 3. 3. It signifies Rites expresly contained in writing Act. 6. 14. 4. It betokens that which is not committed to writing but only delivered by lively voice of the Apostles 5. It signifieth that which is invented and delivered by men not immediately called In Scripture Tradition is taken 1. In good part for any Rite or Doctrine of God delivered to his Church either by word or writing whether it concern faith and good works or the external Government of the Church 2 Thess. 2. 15. 1 Cor. 11. 15. and 23. 2. In ill part it noteth the vain idle and unwarrantable inventions of men whether Doctrine or Rites Mat. 15. 3. Mar. 7. 8 9. When the Fathers speak reverently of Traditions by the word Tradition either they understand the holy Scripture which also is a Tradition it is a Doctrine left unto us Or by Traditions they understand observations touching Ecclesiastical policy Du Moulin Reasons confirming the sufficiency of Scripture against Popish Traditions 1. The whole Church is founded upon the Doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles which were not true if any Doctrine was necessary to Salvation not revealed by the Prophets and Apostles 2.
Christ had told them of nor the Scriptures had taught them yet this is rather against the Papists For that which the holy Ghost taught them they undoubtedly left in record unto the Church as being faithful stewards and revealing the whole counsel of God unto the people 4. It hath been the practice of Hereticks as Augustine affirmeth at all times to cover their dreams and phantasies with this sentence of our Saviour Christ. Lastly If it be asked What were those grave and great mysteries which the Apostles could not for their rudeness bear they are forsooth oyl and spittle in Baptism Candles light at noon dayes which was not in the darker time of the Law baptizing of Bels and such like gue-gaws as the grossest and carnallest men are fittest to receive Object 2 Thess 2. 15. Therefore Brethron stand fast and hold the Traditions which ye have been taught whether by word or our Epistle From these words say our Adversaries it appears that all things were not written Et nullum Papistae in Scripturis locum probabiliorem inveniunt saith Whitaker The Hereticks say the Rhemists on this place purposely guilefully and of ill conscience refrain in their Translations from the Ecclesiastical and most usual word Tradition evermore when it is taken in good part though it expresse most exactly the signification of the Greek word but when it soundeth in their fond phantasie against the Traditions of the Church as indeed in true sense it never doth there they use it most gladly Here therefore and in the like places that the Reader may not so easily like of Traditions unwritten commended by the Apostle they translate Instructions Constitutions Ordinances and what they can invent else to hide the Truth from the simple or unwary Reader whose Translations have none other end but to beguile such by Art and Conveyance Thus farre the Rhemists Paul taught the Thessalonians some things by word of mouth which he taught them not in his two Epistles which he wrote unto them therefore he taught some Doctrins which he wrote not as if that Paul wrote no more Epistles then these two whereby that which he taught not them in writing unto them he taught them by writing unto others Secondly How followeth this Argument Paul wrote not all the Doctrines of God unto the Thessalonians therefore they are not all written in the Prophetical and Evangelical writings whereas it is plainly testified that the Old Testament containeth a perfect Rule of the Doctrine of salvation the New being written for a Declaration of the fulfilling and further clearing of that in the Old Testament Thirdly It appeareth manifestly in the Acts what was the summe of that which Paul taught the Thessalonians by word of mouth For there it is witnessed that Paul taught out of the Scriptures that it behoved Christ to suffer and rise again from the dead and that Jesus was Christ this teaching then by word is there limited to the Scriptures of the Law and Prophets Neither ought it to seem strange that this was the summe of all which the Apostle taught at Thessalonica where he he tarried so small a while when amongst the Corinthians where he remained longest of any place and consequently taught most he sheweth that he taught nothing but Christ and him crucified Fourthly The Apostle himself in this very place calling vers 14. whatsoever he taught by word or wrote by the name of the Gospel doth declare evidently that he taught nothing but that which is contained in Scripture seeing the Apostle defineth the Gospel which he preached to be that which is contained in the Scriptures Fifthly That the Thessalonians had some part of Christian Doctrine delivered by word of mouth that is by the Apostles preaching at such time as he did write unto them and some part by his Epistles the Text enforceth us to grant But that the Church at this day or ever since the Testament was written had any Tradition by word of mouth necessary to salvation which was not contained in the Old and New Testament we will never grant The Papists do commonly abuse the name of Tradition which signifieth properly a delivery or a thing delivered for such a matter as is delivered onely by word of mouth and so received from hand to hand that is never put in writing but hath his credit without the holy Scripture of God as the Jews had their Cabala and the Scribes and the Pharisees their Traditions besides the Law of God For the justifying of our Translation it is true that we alter according to the circumstances of the place especially considering that the word Tradition which of it self is indifferent as well to that which is written as to that which is not written hath been of us and them appropriated to note forth onely unwritten Constitutions therefore we must needs avoid in such places as this the word Traditions though our last Translation useth it where the simple might be deceived to think that the Holy Ghoâ—t did ever commend any such to the Church which he would not have committed to writing in the holy Scriptures and in stead of the word so commonly taken although it do not necessarily signifie any such matter we doe use such words as doe truely expresse the Apostles meaning and the Greek word doth also signifie therefore we use these words Ordinances or Instructions Institutions or the Doctrine delivered all which being of one or near sense the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth signifie and the same doth Tradition signifie if it be rightly understood Object 1 Timothy 6. 20. O Timothy Keep that which is committed to thy trust By the name of pledge saith Bellarmine not the Scripture but the treasure of unwritten Doctrine is understood Depositum say the Rhemists is the whole Doctrine of Christianity being taught by the Apostles and delivered their Successors Answ. Though other learned men interpret this pledge or gage to be the gift of the Holy Ghost yet we willingly acknowledge that it is to be understood of the Doctrine of Christianity as that which hath best ground both by circumstance of this and conference of other places Whence we inferre That the Doctrine of truth is not the Churches Decrees but the Lords given to the Church to keep only wherewith the Title of a pledge cannot stand unlesse one may lay to pledge a thing in his own hands since in Popery the Church her self maketh the Doctrine which her self taketh to pledge Herein they handle it like a pledge that they lock it up fast where the people of God for whose use it is given to be kept cannot come unto it What had become of the Law of God if others had not been more faithful keepers of it then the Priests to whom the principal Copy thereof written with the finger of God himself was committed There are some points of faith not contained in the Scripture neither in the Old nor New
the person if it be publick in regard of the means is not forbidden for it is lawful for one man with Scripture Toti resistere mundo saith the Glosse of the Canon-Law the meaning of this place is That the Prophets were no Interpreters or Messengers of their own mindes but Gods The Catholicks hold saith Chamier meaning still by that Title the Protestants that the Scripture is to be interpreted by private labour and industry viz. of Augustine Ierom Chrysostom but not in a private sense that is in a sense arising from the brain of the Interpreter It is true saith Cartwright against the Rhemists that the Scriptures cannot be expounded of every private spirit nor which is more of any private spirit nor yet of all private spirits together but only of those which are inspired of God viz. the Prophets and Apostles which are here opposed unto private Interpretation And therefore it is evident That the Exposition of the Scripture ought not to be fetched from Ecclesiastical either Fathers or Councels which speak not by Inspiration but from the Scriptures themselves what he meaneth he declareth in the next verse where he sheweth the reason of his saying namely that it must be interpreted as it was written and by as high Authority Seeing therefore it was first spoken by holy men which spake as they were led by the holy Spirit and were inspired of God it followeth that it must be interpreted by the same Authority The Interpretation therefore that is brought out of the Apostles and Prophets is not private although it be avowed by one man only On the other side that Interpretation which is not brought from thence although it have the allowance of whole general Councels is but private This is a principal meaning of our Saviour Christ when he willeth that we should call no man Father or Master in the earth that is in matter of Doctrine we should depend upon the Authority of no man nor of all men in the earth but only upon Christ and upon God Our reasons by which we prove that the chiefest Judgment and Authority of interpreting Scriptures is to be given not to the Church but to the Scriptures themselves and the holy Ghost 1. That which only hath power to beget faith that only hath the chiefest Authority of interpreting Scripture and of determining all Controversies concerning Faith and Religion but the Scriptures onely and the Holy Ghost have this force Rom. 10. 17. The Holy Ghost onely can infuse saving Faith into our hearts which is called by the Schoolmen Infusa Fides The Faith which we have from the Church is acquired and sufficeth not to a certain perswasion 2. The Scriptures cannot be interpreted but by the same Spirit wherewith they were written that Spirit is found no where but in the Scripture whosoever have promises from God to understand the Scripture may interprett it but so have all the faithfull 3. Christ himself makes the Scripture a Judge Iohn 12. 48. and still appealed to it 4. Although the Fathers were men indued of God with excellent gifts and brought no small light to understanding of the Scriptures yet learned men in our dayes may give a right sense of sundry places thereof which the Fathers saw not yea against the which perhaps they consent Hath any man living read all the Fathers Nay have all the men living read them Nay Can they shew them Can they get them I had almost said Can they name them In the Exposition of those words Tu es Petrus super hanc petram almost every one of the Fathers at least the most part of them and the best expound it of Peters faith yet the Papists understand it non de fide sed de persona Petri. Here they disagree themselves from the Fathers Iohn 10. 16. by the title of one Shepheard Augustine Chrysostome Ierome Cyril Theodoret Theophylact Euthimius Rupertus Cyprian and other Fathers agree that Christ is theredesigned but Stapleton saith the Pope is there meant In the Division of the Law they go clean contrary to the greatest part of the Fathers for they divide the Commandments as we do but the Papists make the two first one and the tenth two 2. They have no father to countenance them in this but Augnstine Revet de Authoritate Patrum c. 5 6 7. There were no writings of the Fathers for a time many of them wrote 400 years after Christ but some 500 and 600 years after Christ what rule had they before that time of interpreting Scriptures The Fathers were given too much to allegorizing Cajetane therefore in the Preface of his Commentaries upon the Books of Moses saith That the exposition of the Scripture is not tied by God to the sense of the Fathers therefore he admonisheth his Readers not to take it ill if he sometime dissent from the stream of the Fathers 4. The Doctrine of the Church must be examined by the Scriptures Acts 17. 11. If Pauls doctrine much more may the decrees of the Pope Church Councels be examined by the Scriptures 5. The interpretation of the Scripture is a gift freely given by God for the edification of the Church Rom. 12. 6. 1 Cor. 12. 10. therefore it is not tied to a certain kinde of men but common to the faithful 6. The faithful are commanded diligently to try and examine every doctrine 1 Thess. 5. 21. 1 Iohn 4. 1. which cannot be altogether done without interpretation What means must be used in the interpretation of Scripture The end of the Scripture we heard was to direct the Church to all saving truth The means to be used for the attaining of that end by the Minister is diligent study and humble Prayer by the People attentive reading hearing prayer and meditating First the Teachers must pray earnestly to God for his spirit to inlighen them Mat. 7. 7 8 9. Rom. 15. The Scriptures are understood by that spirit that dictated them Secondly The Pastors and Teachers of the Church must diligently and painfully study the Scriptures giving themselves to read compare place with place Iohn 5. 39. Search the Scriptures it is a metaphor taken from such as search for Gold and Silver Oar in the earth who will search and sift and break every clod to finde out the gold Solomon useth the same metaphor Prov. 2. 4. and to this diligence in searching doth the Apostle exhort Timothy 1 Tim. 4. 13. This diligence of often exprest in Scripture in the Old Testament by the phrase of meditating in the word Iosh. 1. 8. Psal. 1. 2. Thirdly they must labour for a competent knowledge in the original tongues the Hebrew and Greek in which the Scripture was written that so they may consult with the Hebrew Text in the Old and the Greek in the New Testament and see with their own not anothers eyes as Gen. 3. 15. The Papists read it corruptly She shall break here the original soon determines the
Pope approves The Practice of the Church is that which the Pope observes the Interpretation of the Fathers is that which the Pope follows the Determination of Councels what the Pope confirms so that the Pope must interpret all Scripture But divers Reasons may be alledged to shew that the true Interpretation of Scripture is not to be sought for from the Popes of Rome 1. Because the Popes of Rome have frequently and grosly erred in interpreting of Scripture as in Rom. 8. 8. Those that are in the flesh cannot please God that is Those that are married said Siricius the Pope Innocent so expounded those words Iohn 6. Unlesse you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his bloud you shall have no life in you that he thence concluded That there is no salvation without receiving the Eucharist and that it is to be given to Infants Pope Boniface interpreted Luke 22. 38. of the Temporall and Spirituall Sword delivered to the Pope 2. Because the Popes of Rome doe differ among themselves in interpreting of Scripture as Matth. 16. 18. Some Popes say rightly that by the Rock Christ or the Confession of Faith given by Peter concerning Christ is meant others interpret it of the person of Peter the Apostle others expound it to be the Romane Seat or Chair 3. Because many of the Popes of Rome have not only erred but been grosse and wicked Hereticks Liberius the Pope about the year 350 was an Arian and subscribed to the unjust condemnation of Athanasius and afterward as an obstinate Heretick was deposed Honorius the first was a Monothâ—lite he held that Christ had but one will and so but one nature and for this Heresie was condemned in three General Councels Some Popes were Atheists as Leo the tenth who called the Gospel Fabulam de Christâ— One cals the Pope that great Heteroclite in religion another saith The Pope is the worst of Cardinals who are the worst of Priests who are the worst of Papists who are the worst of Christians That the general consent of Fathers is no good Rule for interpreting Scriptures See Iaâ—â—â—us Laurentius his singular Tractate entituled Reverentia Eccles. Rom. erga S. Pat. veteres subdola Artic. 2. Proposit. 9. In his Auctarium he proves that the Protestants do more esteem the Fathers then the Papists and Jesuites For Councels Gregory the Pope equalizeth the four first General Councels to the four Gospels not in respect of Authority but in respect of the verity of the Articles defined in them He saith not They could as little erre but they did as little erre in their decisions or to speak more properly That their Doctrine was as true as Gospel because the Determinations in those first General Councels against Hereticks are evidently deduced out of holy Scriptures Dr Featley's Stricturae in Lyndomastigem concerning the 7 Sac. For if these four general Councels be of equal Authority with the four Gospels the Popes Authority as Papists say being above the Authority of the Councels it followeth That his Authority is greater then the Evangelists then which what can be more blasphemously spoken We say the true Interpretation of Scripture is not to be sought from general Councels First Because even universal Councels have erred the Chalcedonian Councel one of the four so much magnified by Pope Gregory in rashly preferring the Constantinopolitane Church before that of Alexandria and Antioch Those that condemned Christ were then the universal visible Church Matth. 26. 65. Iohn 11. 47. See Act. 4. 18. Secondly General Councels have been opposite one to another that of Constance to the other of Basil whereof one setteth down that Councels could erre and so also the Pope and that a Councel was above the Pope the other affirmeth the quite contrary Thirdly There were no general Councels after the Apostles for three hundred years till the first Councel of Nice when yet the Church had the true sense of the Scriptures Fourthly The general Councels interpreted Scripture by Scripture as Athanasius and Ambrose teach concerning the first Councel of Nice Fifthly Because they cannot be so easily celebrated to declare any doubtfull sense of Scripture They have expounded but few places of Scripture neither is it likely the Pope will assemble them to expound the rest The Papists say That the Scripture ought to be expounded by the Rule of Faith and therefore not by Scripture only But the Rule of Faith and Scripture is all one As the Scriptures are not of man but of the Spirit so their Interpretation it not by man but of the Spirit like wise Let Councels Fathers Churches give their sense of the Scripture its private if it be not the sense and interpretation of the Spirit Let a private man give the true sense of the Scripture it s not private because its Divine the sense of the holy Ghost and private in 2 Pet. 1. 20. is not opposed to publick but to Divine and the words are to be read No Scripture is of a mans own Interpretation that is private contrary to Divine The word is interpreted aright by declaring 1. The Order 2. The Summe or Scope 3. The Sense of the words which is done by framing a Rhetorical and Logical Analysis of the Text. In giving the sense three Rules are of principal use and necessity to be observed 1. The literal and largest sense of any words in Scripture must not be imbraced farther when our cleaving thereunto would breed some disagreement and contrariety between the present Scripture and some other Text or place else shall we change the Scripture into a Nose of wax 2. In case of such appearing disagreement the holy Ghost leads us by the hand to seek out some distinction restriction limitation or figure for the reconcilement thereof and one of these will alwayes fit the purpose for Gods word must always bring perfect truth it cannot fight against it self 3. Such figurative Sense Limitation Restriction or Distinction must be sought out as the Word of God affordeth either in the present place or some other and chiefly those that seem to differ with the present Text being duly compared together The End of the first Book THE SECOND BOOK OF GOD. CHAP. I. That there is a God HAving handled the Scripture which is principium cognoscendi in Divinity I now proceed to Treat of God who is principium essendi or thus The Scripture is the rule of Divinity God and his works are the matter or parts of Divinity This Doctrine is 1. Necessary 1. Because man was made for that end that he might rightly acknowledge and worship God love and honor him 2. It is the end of all Divine Revelation Iohn 5. 39. 3. To be ignorant of God is a great misery Being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them 2. Profitable Our welfare and happiness consists in the knowledge of God Ier. 9. 23. Iohn 17. 3. the knowledge of God
God 2. Epicurism scoffing at Divinity 3. Heresie depraving and corrupting Divinity VI. The Excellency of Divine Knowledge or the study of Divinity appeareth in these particulars 1. In the subject Matter of it which is Divine either in its own Nature as God and Christ Psal. 70. 7. Ioh. 5. 46. or in relation to him as the Scripture Sacraments It is called The wisdom of God Prov. 2. 10. 3. 13. 1 Cor. 2. 6 7. and That wisdom which is from above Jam. 3. 17. If to know the nature of an Herb or the Sun and Stars be excellent how much more to know the Nature of God Aristotle held it a great matter to know but a little concerning the first mover and Intelligences Paul desired to know nothing but Christ and him crucified 1 Cor. 2. 2. that is he professed no other knowledge Si Christum discis satis est si caetera nescis Si Christum nescis nihil est si cetera discis In this Mystery of Christ God is revealed in the highest and most glorious way 2 Cor. 4. 6. there is more wisdom holinesse power justice discovered in the Mystery of the Gospel then was known before to men and Angels Christ is the summe of all divine revealed truths Luk. 24. 27. Acts 10. 43. Here is the onely knowledge which is necessary to make the man of God perfect Col. 2. 3. The Metaphysicks handle not things properly divinely revealed but that which the Philosophers by the light of nature judged to be Divine 2. In the End The principal and main end of Divinity is the glory of God that is the Celebration or setting forth of Gods infinite Excellency the secondary end is mans blessednesse Iohn 17. 3. 3. In the Certainty of it Gods Word is said to be sure and like Gold seven times refined there is no drosse of falshood in it The Academicks thought every thing so uncertain that they doubted of all things 4. In the Cause of it These truths are such as cannot be known but by Gods revealing them to us All Scripture was given by Divine Inspiration Flesh and bloud hath nor revealed this unto thee a humane light is enough to know other things 5. In the Holinesse of it Psal. 19. 5. By them thy servant is fore-warned 1 Tim. 3. 15. The word of God is able to make us wise to Salvation and to furnish to every good work Christ makes this a cause of the errour and wickednesse in mans life that they do not read and understand the Scriptures 6. In the Delight and Sweetnesse of it Iob 23. 12. preferred the Word of God before his food David before thousands of Gold and Silver before the honey and the honey-comb Psal. 19. 10. 119. 103. and when he ceaseth to compare he beginneth to admire Wanderfull are thy Testimonies Archimedes took great delight in the Mathematicks Augustine refused to take delight in Tullies Hortensius because the name of Jesus Christ was not there Nomen Iesu non erat ibi He saiâ—â— in his Confessions Sacrae Scripturae tuae sunt sanctae deliciae meae 7. In the Excellency of the Students of it 1. The Saints of God in the Old Testament the Patriarks and Prophets 1 Pet. 1. 10 11. 2. The Saints of God in the New Testament Matth. 11. 25. Col. 1. 27. 3. It is the study of the Angels and Saints of God sn heaven 1 Pet. 1. 12. Ephes. 3. 10. 1. The natural knowledge and enquiry of the Angels could never have discovered to them the Mystery of Christ in the Gospel 2. They know it by the Church that is saith Oecumenius by the several dispensations of God to his people under the Gospel 8. In that the Devil and Hereticks oppose it The Papists would not have the Bible translated nor Divine Service performed in the vulgar tongue CHAP. II. Of the Divine Authority of the Scriptures TWo things are to be considered in Divinity First The Rule of it the Scripture or Word of God Secondly The Matter of Parts of it concerning God and man Principium essendi in Divinity is God the first Essence Principium cognoscendi the Scripture by which we know God and all things concerning him I shall handle both these principles but begin with the Scripture as many Systematical Writers do IT is necessary that the true Religion have a rule whereby it may be squared else there could be no certainty in it but there would be as many Religions as men It appears by the light of nature the Heathen had known rules for their Rites Ceremonies and Services the Turks have their Alcoran the Iews their Talmud the Papists their Decretals every Art hath its Rule neither can any thing be a Duty which hath not a Rule There are three general Characters whereby we may know any Word to be the Word of God and a Religion to be the true Religion 1. That which doth most set forth the glory of God 2. That which doth direct us to a rule which is a perfect rule of holinesse toward God and righteousnesse toward man 3. That which shews a way sutable to Gods glory and mens necessity to reconcile us to God The word of God sets forth Gods glory in all the perfections and is a compleat rule of holinesse to God and righteousnesse to men All the wisdom of the world cannot shew what is more sutable to the glory of God and the nature of man to reconcile God and men then for him that is God and man to do it God revealed himself divers wayes to the Fathers Heb. 1. 1. The manner of revealing Gods will is three-fold according to our three instruments of conceiving viz. Understanding Phantasie and Senses to the understanding God revealed his Will by engraving it in the heart with his own finger Ier. 31. 33. by Divine inspiration 2 Pet. 1. 21. 2 Chron. 15. 1. Heb. 8. 11. Iohn 14. 26. and by intellectual Visions Numb 11. 5. to the phantasie God revealed his Will by imaginary Visions to Prophets awake and by dreams to Prophets asleep Gen. 40. 8. 41. 8 9. Acts 16. 10. 10. 3. Numb 14. 4. to the Senses God revealed his Will and that either by Vision to the Eye or lively Voice to the Ear Gen. 3. 9. 4. 6. 15. 4 5. Exod. 20. 1 2. 3. 1 2 3. 33. 17. And lastly by writing This Revelation was sometimes immediate by God himself after an unspeakable manner or by means viz. Angels Urim and Thummim Prophets Christ himself and his Apostles The written Word for the Matter contained in it is called The word of God Rom. 9 6 for the manner of Record The Scripture John 10. 35. 2 Tim. 3. 16. 1 Pet. 2. 6. or Scriptures Matth. 22. 29. John 5. 39. Rom. 15. 4. 2 Pet. 3. 16. By an Antonomasie or an excellency of phrase as the most worthy writings that ever saw the light sometimes with an
more but also because fulnesse of all good that can be wished is to be found in God Therefore our happinesse is Compleat and Perfect when we enjoy God as an object wherein the powers of the soul are satisfied with everlasting delight This may suffice to have spoken concerning Gods Essence and Attributes by which it appears that God is far different both from all feigned gods and from all creatures The consideration of the Divine Persons followeth for in one most simple nature of God there are distinct Persons CHAP. XVI Of the Trinity or Distinction of Persons in the Divine Essence VVE say God may be known by light of nature Quod attinet ad unitatem Naturae but not Quod attinet ad Trinitatem Personarum We cannot by the light of nature know the mystery of the Trinity nor the Incarnation of Jesus Christ. 1 Cor. 2. 7 8. Aquinas par 1. Summae Theol. Quaest. 32. Art 1. Conclus saith Impossibile est per rationem naturalem ad Trinitatis divinarum personarum cognitionem pervenire It is impossible by natural reason to come to the knowledge of the Trinity of the Divine Persons He there shews that he which indeavours to prove this mystery by natural reason derogates from faith in respect of drawing others to believe Cum enim aliquis faith he excellently ad probandum fidem inducit rationes quae non sunt cogentes cedit in irrisionem infidelium Credunt enim quod hujusmodi rationibus innitamur propter eas credamus When a man to prove any Article of faith urgeth reasons that are not cogent he exposeth himself to the derision of Infidels For they suppose that we rely on such reasons and believe because of them We think saith Cloppenburg in his Answer to Bidel Argum 1. that the mystery of the holy Trinity as many mysteries of faith can neither be demonstrated nor refuted by reason 2 Cor. 10. 5. Adam in the state of innocency was not able by natural reason to finde out the Trinity But when by faith we receive this Doctrine we may illustrate it by reason The similâ—es which the Schoolmen and other Divines bring drawn from the creature are unequal and unsatisfactory since there can be no proportion between things Finite and Infinite Two resemblances are much used in Scripture the Light and the Word The Light which was three dayes before the Sunne Gen. 1. and then condensed into that glorious body and ever since diffused throughout the world is all one and the same Light So the Father of Lights which inhabiteth Light which none can approach Iam 1. 17. and Sunne of Righteousnesse Mal. 4. 2. In whom all the fulnesse of the God-head dwelleth bodily and the holy Ghost the Spirit of illumination are all one and the same God Again It is the same thing that the minde thinketh and the word signifieth and the voice uttereth so is the Father as the minde conceiving the Son as the Word conceived or begotten the holy Ghost as the voice or speech uttered and imparted to all hearers and all one and the same God A studious Father meditating on the mystery of the Trinity there appeared unto him a childe with a shell lading the Sea into a little hole he demanding what the childe did I intend said the childe to empty the Ocean into this pit It is impossible said the Father as possible said the childe as for thee to comprehend this profound mystery in thy shallow capacity The Mystery of the Trinity is necessary to be known and believed of all that shall be saved it was not so plainly revealed to the Jews of old as it is to us in the New Testament a perfect and full knowledge of this mystery is not attainable in this life Although Trinity in its native signification signifie the number of any three things yet by Ecclesiastical custome it is limited to signifie the three Persons in the Trinity This is not meant as if the Essence did consist of three Persons as so many parts and therefore there is a great difference between Trinity and Triplicity Trinity is when the same Essence hath divers wayes of subsisting and Triplicity is when one thing is compounded of three as parts they are three not in respect of Essence or Divine Attributes three Eternals but three in respect of personal properties as the Father is of none the Sonne of the Father and the holy Ghost of both three Persons but one God as to be to be true to be good are all one because Transcendents The acts of the Persons in the God-head say some are of three sorts 1. Essential in which all the Persons have equal hand Opera Trinitatis ad extra sunt indivisa the outward works which concern the creature belong to one Person as well as the other as to create govern 2. Some ad intra opera propria The personal properties or internal works are distinguished as the Father begets the Son is begotten of the Father and the holy Ghost proceeds from the Father and the Son 3. Appropriata as the Schools speak acts of office more peculiarly attributed to one Person thâ—n another Eph. 4. 7. So the Father is said to give the Son the Son to redeem the world to be made flesh the holy Ghost is the bond of union See Dr Hampton on Gen. 1. 6. 1 Pet. 1. 2. Gods plot in the work of Redemption was not only say some to exalt the Attributes of the Nature but to glorifie the Persons distinctly according to their appropriated acts There is in the Trinity alius alius another and another but not aliud aliud another thing and another thing as there is in Christ the Father is another Person from the Sonne but yet there is the same Nature and Essence of them all They differ not in their Natures as three men or three Angels differ for they differ so as one may be without the other but now the Father is not without the Sonne nor the Sonne without the Father so that there is the same numerical Essence The Father in some sense is said to be the onely God Iohn 17. 3. that is besides the Divine Nature which is common to the three Persons there is not another God to be found the word Onely is opposed to all feigned gods to every thing which is not of this Divine Nature So when it is said None knoweth the Father but the Sonne and the Sonne but the Father that excludes not the holy Ghost which searcheth the hidden things of God but all which are not of that Essence Though there be no inequality in the Persons yet there is an order not of dignity but of beginning The Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost made the world not as if there were so many partial causes much lesse as if God the Father were the Principal and these Instrumental but only meer order A Person is Diversus modus
the Angels of God worship him Revel 5. 13. The Lamb that is Christ hath the same worship rendred to him that the Father hath We are commanded to call upon his name to believe and trust in him Iohn 14. 1. 3. 16. 6. 40. to hope in him Isa. 11. 10. we are baptized in his name Matth. 28. 19. Act. 8. 16. and swear by him Rom. 9. 1. The mystery of the Sons generation is so profound that it is difficult and dangerous to wade further in it then we have clear ground from Scripture that the Sonne was of the Father begotten from eternity and is one with him and of equal power and dignity seems clear from Prov. 8 23 26. Iohn 1. 3. 10. 30. and 17. 5. Phil. 2. 6. but Modus quo genitus fuerit seems to some beyond humane reach Some of our Divines say Christ is begotten of the Father by a communication of the Divine Essence if this be granted say others it will be hard to defend the God-head of Christ. He that is God must have his being from himself à se Deus à Patre Filius Mr Wotton on Ioh. 1. goes this way and some others But some say then he should be his adopted Son Vide Bellar. de Christo l. 2. c. 15. The Athanasian Creed hath it God of God and Christ saith of the holy Ghost that he shall receive of him Illud arctè nobis tenendum à persona Patris per generationem Filio esse communicatam essentiam ingenitam R. Usser Ignat. Clem. Interpolator haeresi suspectus cap. 15. That Christ hath his God-head from the Father makes not against his God-head but for it if he hath the same God-head which the Father hath though from the Father then he is the same God with the Father Object Matth. 19. 17. Christ denieth that he was good because he was not God Answ. Christ applieth himself to him to whom he spake now he called Christ good in no other sense then he would have done any other Prophet and in this sense Christ rebuked him for calling him good Object Ioh. 17. 3. God the Father is called the only true God Answ. Some referre both these to God himself and Christ but others give a general rule that the Word alone is not opposed to the other Persons but to the creatures and feigned gods and so Ioh. 8. 9. the woman is not excluded but her accusers the added expressions shew him to be God because it is life eternal to know him as well as the Father Object Ephes. 4. 6. Answ. The word Father is not there used relatively or personally for the first Person in the Trinity but essentially as Mal. 2. Is there not one Father of us all and so he is God called Father in regard of his works ad extra Object Iohn 14. 28. My Father is greater then I. Answ. As he was man only or Mediator the Father was greater then he but as he was God that is true Iohn 10. 38. I and my Father are one not in union of will as Ioh. 17. 21. but in unity of nature See Phil. 2. 6. Object Prov. 8. 22. Ariuâ— objected this place The Lord possessed me in the beginning of his way Answ. This place much puzled the Fathers for want of skill in the original Tongue it is in the Hebrew Possessed me the beginning of his way So Arius Montanus reads it See vers 25. It is spoken of Christ as Mediator Object Col. 1. 15. Christ is called the first-born of every creature therefore he is a creature Here the Arrians say Christ is imanifestly called a creature Cum Christus primâ—genitus omnis creaturae sit eum unum â— numero creaturarum esse oportere necesse est Ea enim in Scripturis vis est primogeniti ut primogenitum unum ex eorum genere quorum primogenitus est esse necesse est Catechis Eccl. Polon c. 1. de persond Christi Ans. There are three answers given to this Text in the Annot. Edit 2. Vid. Bez. in loc It is a figurative speech Christ had the preâ—eminence over the creatures was Lord over them as the first-born An Arrian executed at Norwich for blasphemy against Christ in the dayes of Queen Elizabeth being moved to repent that Christ might pardon him replied to this effect and is that God of yours so merciful indeed as to pardon so readily those that blaspheme him then I renounce and defie him The Socinians deny Christ to be God and oppose his merits and satisfaction unto God for our sins they hold Christ is God salvo meliâ—ri judicio or prout mihi videtur till they can examine it better They are more vexed with Athanasius then with any other and call him for Athanasius Sathanasius he stood against three hundred Bishops in a Councel and maintained the Divinity of Christ against the Arian faction He hath written also most copiously against the Arrians and hath solidly refuted their arguments against the Divinity of Christ. The Gospel of S. Iohn was chiefly penned for this end to prove the Deity of Christ Christ there gives a resolute and constant testimony of himself that he was the Son of God and very God never any creature took this title upon him to be called God but the fearful judgements of God were upon him for it Mr Perkins on the Creed See him also on Iude. Vide Lod. Viv. de verit Fid. Christ. l. 2. c. 12. 14. Many Hereticks denied the God-head of Christ as Ebion Cerinthus Arrius the Jews also and Mahometans some denying him to be God others saying that he was not absolutely God but inferiour to him He is God not by office nor by favour nor by similitude nor in a figure as sometimes Angels and Magistrates are called Gods but by nature he is equal and co-essential with his Father there is one God-head common to all the three persons the Father the Sonne and the Spirit and therefore it is said Phil. 2. 6. that He was in the form of God and thought it no robbery to be equal with God Lo an equality to God the Father ascribed to him he is not God in any secondary or inferiour manner but is in the very form of God equal to him the God-head of all the three Persons being one and the same To beat down Arius his heresie the first Councel of Nice was called the Nicene Creed made The difference between the Councel of Nice and Arius was but in a Letter whether Christ was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â— like in essence or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 coessential to the Father The Arian Heretick presseth Augustine to shew where the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is read in Scripture Angustine asketh what is Homoousion Consubstantiall but I and my Father are one See of Arius his Heresie and end Heilins Geograph pag. 725. Amphilâ—chius a worthy Bishop petitioned Theodosius the Emperour that the Arians might not have publick
as that they had made an inequality between the Persons But since their forme of speech is That the holy Ghost proceedeth from the Father by the Sonne and is the Spirit of the Sonne without making any difference in the Consubstantiality of the Persons it is a true though an erroneous Church in this particular Divers learned men thinke that a Filio per Filium in the sense of the Greek Church was but a Question in modo loquendi in manner of speech and not fundamental 3. The personal propriety of the holy Ghost is called procession or emanation Iohn 15. 26. Bellarmine proves the Procession of the holy Ghost from the Sonne by Ioh 16. 14. and from Iohn 20. 22. by that ceremony Augustine and Cyril say Christ would signifie that the holy Ghost proceeds from him and Bellarmine produceth fifteen Latine and as many Greek witnesses who most evidently taught before the Grecians denied the Procession of the holy Ghost that the holy Ghost proceeded from the Father and the Son Bellarm. de Christo l. 2. c. 22. Neither hath the Word defined nor the Church known a formal difference between this Procession and generation The third internal difference among the Persons is in the number for they are three subsisting truly distinctly and per se distinguished by their relations and properties for they are internal works and different and incommunicably proper to every person There follows an external distinction in respect of effects and operations which the Persons exercise about external objects namely the creatures for though the outward works are undivided in respect of the Essence yet in respect of the manner and determination all the persons in their manner and order concurre to such works As the manner is of existing so of working in the Persons The Father is the original and principle of action works from himself by the Son as by his image and wisdom and by the holy Ghost But he is said to work by his Son not as an instrumental but as a principal cause distinguished in a certain manner from himself as the Artificer works by an Image of his work framed in his minde which Image or Idea is not in the instrumental cause of the work but his hand To the Son is given the dispensation and administration of the action from the Father by the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 8. 6. Iohn 1. 3. 5. 19. To the holy Ghost is given the consummation of the action which he effects from the Father and the Son Iob. 26. 13. 1 Cor. 12. 11. The effects or works which are distinctly given to the Persons are Creation ascribed to the Father Redemption to the Sonne Sanctification to the holy Ghost all which things are done by the Persons equally and inseparably in respect of the effect it selfe but distinctly in respect of the manner of working The equality of the Persons may be proved 1. By the work of Creation joyntly Psal. 33. 6. severally for the Father those places prove it 1 Cor. 8. 6. Heb. 1. 2. the Sonne Iohn 1. 3 10. Col. 1. 16. the holy Ghost Iob 33. 4. 2. By the work of Redemption the Father sends and gives the Sonne the Sonne is sent and given by him the holy Ghost perfects the work of Conception and Incarnation Luke 1. 35. 3. By the work of Sanctification the Father sanctifieth Iohn 17. 17. Iude v. 1. the Son Ephes. 526. the holy Ghost 2 Thess. 2. 13. 1 Pet. 1. 2. 4. By the worship of religious adoration The Father is religiously adored often in the Scripture Ephes. 1. 17. the Sonne Acts 7. 59. Heb. 1. 6. the holy Ghost Act. 28. 25 26. Rom. 9. 1. This is a wonderful mystery rather to be adored and admired then enquired into yet every one is bound to know it with an apprehensive knowledge though not with a comprehensive No man can be saved without the knowledge of the Father he hath not the Father who denieth the Son and he receives not the holy Ghost who knows him not Ioh. 14. 17. 2. We must worship the Unity in Trinity and Trinity in Unity as it is in Athanasius his Creed We must worship God as one in substance and three in Persons as if Thomas Iohn and Matthew had one singular soul and body common to them all and entirely possessed of every one we were baptized in the Name of Father Son and holy Ghost We worship another God then the Idolaters could imagine their God to be they conceived him to be the Creator and Governour of all things Omnipotent Eternal but they worshipped not one God in three Persons the Father who accepts the Spirit who works and the Sonne who presents our services One main intendment in the New Covenant was not onely to honour the Attributes of the nature but the glory of the Persons Ephes. 1. 3 7 13 14. 2. All the Persons have a special hand in the salvation of a sinner and every believer hath a special interest in the promises of the Persons Ioh. 5. 19. 3. The order of working in the Persons is sutable to the order of their subsisting the Father is first in order therefore in working therefore Adoption is reckoned by some Divines as the first of spiritual benefits then Redemption and Sanctification 4. We should walk in the love of them all 1 Ioh. 4. 16. See Iohn 5. 9. 14. 23 16. 27. and fear to offend them all not only the Father but the Son Ezek. 21. 10. and the Spirit Ephes. 4. 30. 3. We should praise God for revealing this mystery to us in his Word and be assured that what he promiseth or threatens shall be accomplished being confirmed by three witnesses Prudentius hath exercised his Poetry well in defending and illustrating the whole Christian religion against the Jews Heathens and Hereticks and in celebrating the holy Trinity The End of the second Book THE THIRD BOOK OF Gods Works CHAP. I. Of Gods Decree and especially of Predestination and the Parts thereof Election and Reprobation HAving spoken of the Scripture and God the works of God in the next place are to be handled which some make two the Decree and the Execution of the Decree others three Decree Creation Providence The works of God whereby he moves himself to his Creatures are three Decree Creation Providence not three individually for so they are innumerable but in the species and kinds of things The works of God are 1. Before time or eternall his Decree 2. In time 1. Past Creation of all things 2. Present Gubernation and Sustentation Government and Preservation Or thus Gods Works are 1. Internall which are in the very will of God from eternity and they are called the Decrees of God by which God determined from eternity what he would do in time We follow the received Phrase of Divines when we call the Decrees the works of God and speak of God after our capacity Therefore we call Decrees of God his Works because
in nummo aliter in Filio Augustine The Image of God in which man was created is the conformity of man unto God 1. In his soul. 2. In his body for his soul. 3. In the whole person for the union of both The soul of a man is conformable to God in respect of its Nature Faculties and Habits First In respect of its Nature Essence or Being as it is a spiritual and immortal Substance The Scripture witnesseth 1. That the soul of a man is a spirit Mat. 27. 20. Acts 7. 59. as appears by comparing the 1 Pet. 4. 19. with Heb. 12. 9. in Peter God is called The Creator of souls in the Hebrews The Father of spirits in the same sense 2. That it is immortal 2 Cor. 5. 8. Phil. 1. 21 22. 2 Pet. 1. 14. The Sadduces indeed denied the immortality of the soul this opinion of theirs began on this occasion Antigonus Sochaeus the Disciple of Simeon the just said We must not serve God for hope of reward or wages Hence his Disciples Sadok and Baithos took occasion to teach that there is no reward or punishment after this life whereas Antigonus meant that there ought to be in us so great love of the Divine Majesty and of vertue it self that we should be willing to serve God and ready to suffer any thing without looking for any reward or wages Reasons of its immortality 1. Because it cannot be destroyed by any second cause Mat. 10. 28. 2. Being severed from the body it subsists by it self and goes to God Eccl. 12. 7. Luk. 16. 22. 3. Because it is a simple and immaterial substance not depending on matter the minde works the better the more it is abstracted from the body when it is asleep or dying 4. Because it transcends all terrene and mortal things and with a wonderful quicknesse searcheth after heavenly divine and eternal things There is an invincible argument for the thing secretly imprinted in the instinct and conscience of the soul it self Because it is every good mans hope that it shall be so and wicked mans fear 5. The food of the soul is immortal 1 Pet. 1. 23. the evident promises of eternal life prove the soul to be immortal He that beleeveth in me hath eternal life and To day thou shalt be with me in Paradise Nothing can satisfie the soul but God 6. Man is capable of vertue and vice of immortal desires and affections 7. The souls of Adam and Eve were not made of any matter but came by immediate Creation in whom God gave a specimen what he would perpetually do with other men That is but a cavil that Solomon Eccl. 12. 7. speaks only of our first Parents See Dr Rainolds of the Passions c. 34. Children are called the fruit of their Parents body to note that they are only fathers of their flesh they have another namely God which is Father of their spirits S. Paul teacheth it Heb. 12. 9. and the use of it And this checks their opinion who will have souls propagated no lesse then bodies Many collect the immortality of the soul and salvation of Iobs children because they were not doubled as the rest of his estate was The soul of man is as it were the breath of God God did not say of mans soul as of other creatures Let it be made Let there be a soul in mans body No but when he had formed the body he breathed the soul into him It was to note that the soul of man had a more heavenly and divine original then any of the other creatures that are here in this world Vide Bellarm. de Amis gratiae lib. 4. cap. 11. See Sir Walter Rawleighs Ghost lib. 2. per totum And Master Rosse his Philos. Touchstone Conclusion 2. The soul of man is conformable to God in respect of its faculties in its Understanding Will and Memory is like the Trinity 3. In the Qualities Graces and admirable endowments of it In the Understanding there was First An exact knowledge of God and all Divine things Col. 3. 10. Knowledge is a principal part of Gods Image by reason he was inabled to conceive of things spiritual and universal Secondly A perfect Knowledge of all inferiour things Adam knew Eve and imposed names on the creatures sutable to their natures He had most exquisite prudence in the practical part of his understanding in all doubtful cases He knew what was to be done 2. In the Will there was holinesse Ephes. 4. 24. God had the highest place in his soul his glory was his end His liberty then stood not in this that he could stand or fall a possibility to sin is no perfection Thirdly The image of God in our affections stood in four things 1. All the affections were carried to their proper objects Adam loved feared and desired nothing but what God had commanded him to love fear and desire 2. They were guided by a right rule and carried in a due proportion to their objects Adam loved not his wife more then God 3. They were voluntary affections he loved a thing because his will made choise of it 4. They were whetstones of the soul in acting From this Image did necessarily follow peace with God fellowship and union He knew God to be his Creator and to love him in all good things he enjoyed God and tasted his sweetnesse Mans body also after a sort is an Image of Divine Perfection Observe first The Majestical form of it of which the Heathens took notice by the structure of the body a man should be taught to contemn the earth which his feet tread upon and to set his heart upon Heaven whether his eyes naturally tend It was convenient for man to have an erect stature 1. Because the senses were given to man not only to procure the necessaries of life as they were to other living creatures but also to know 2. That the inward faculties may more freely exercise their operations whiles the brain is elevated above all the parts of the body Aquinas part 1. Quaest. 91. Artic. 3. he gives two more reasons there of it Secondly Gods artifice in it Psal. 139. 15. Thou hast curiously wrought me and I was wonderfully made Vide Lactantium de opificio Dei Materiam superabat opus of the basest matter dust God made the noblest creature Thirdly The serviceablenesse of every part for its end and use Fourthly There is matter of humiliation because it was made of the dust Gen. 3. 19. Iob 14. 18 19. 5. 15. The Greek name makes man proud cals him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bids him aspire look up but the Hebrew and Latine humble him bids him stoop look down Adams body was mortal conditionally if he had not eaten of the Tree there could be no outward cause of his death for Gods protection kept that off nor no inward cause because original righteousnesse was in his soul and for old age
and worst idolaters that ever were as upon my soul saith he it is not Adoration is not commanded in the institution of it 2. Nothing is to be worshipt with Divine Worship but God Of Transubstantiation The word Transubstantiation as the Papists grant was not used of any ancient Fathers and it was not so named among them before the Councel of Laterane which was 1215 years after Vocabulum ante Concilium Lateranense inauditum The Jesuites which call Protestants in scorn Tropists because they defend a tropical and figurative sense in that speech of Christ This is my body are yet themselves constrained to acknowledge six tropes in the other words of Christs institution of this Sacrament a figure in the word Bread another in Eat a third in Given a fourth in Shed a fifth in Cup a sixth in Testament B. Morton of the Masse lib. 6. cap. 2. Sect. 4. The Papists to avoid one signe runne into many strange ones by the demonstrative Hoc they understand they know not what neither this Body nor this Bread but an individuum vagum something contained under the accidents of Bread which when the Priest saith Hoc it is Bread but when he hath muttered out Meum it is Christs body By the copulative Est is they understand either shall be as soon as the words are spoken or is converted unto or by Body they understand such a Body as indeed is no body without extension of place without faculty sense or motion The very term Matth. 26. 26. manifestly evinceth the truth This What That which he took viz. Bread therefore it must needs be a figurative speech 1 Cor. 10. 4. The Apostle speaking of the Bread being consecrated still calleth it Bread six times at least He calleth it indeed the Bread and this Bread to shew the difference of it from other Bread and the excellency of it above other bread but yet bread Therefore it is still bread of the same substance as other bread is though in respect of use incomparably better And so for the wine Matth. 26. 29. after consecration he saith I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the Vine He doth not say in general Of the fruit of the Vine but particularly with a demonstrative pronoun Of this fruit of the Vine viz. that which he had blest and delivered to the Apostles Transubstantiation was first occasioned by the unwary speeches of Damascene and Theophylact they were hyperbolical in their expressions about the real presence of Christ in the Sacrament Some of the ancient Fathers speaking of the sacramental Elements after consecration being then set apart from common use called it a mutation saying that the Elements were changed into another nature but withall they expresse their meaning to be not the changing of their substance but their use from being common bread and wine to become sacramental or sacred 1 Cor. 11. 27. The Apostle distinguisheth these four things Bread Body Cup and Bloud the Bread and Wine therefore receive no other change but that of use signification and relation 1 Cor. 10. 16. He distinguisheth also Bread from the Body Bread is the subject of the proposition and the Communion of his Body the predicate Reasons against Transubstantiation First Then Christ must hold himself in his own hands eat and drink his own flesh and bloud for the Papists say He did eat the Sacrament with his Disciples Secondly Christ must needs have two Bodies the one broken and having the bloud separated from it in the Cup the other whole and having the bloud in it which holds the Cup. Thirdly Christs bloud then should be shed before his crucifying and so a propitiatory Sacrifice offered to God before the Sacrifice of Christ upon the Crosse. Fourthly One body should be now in a thousand places at a time Fifthly A true body should be without bignesse void of all dimensions Corpus non quantum Sixthly Accidents should be without a subject but Aristotle saith Accidents are entis rather then entia Accident is esse est inesse the very essence of an Accident as it is an Accident is to be in some subject Vide Aquin. 1a 1ae Quaest 90. Artic. 2. Seventhly The same thing should be and not be at the same time or should be before it was Eightly This is an inhumane thing none eat mans flesh but Cannibals Ninthly Then the senses should be deceived we see bread we smell bread we touch bread and taste bread Tenthly There is no alteration in the sign of Baptism and there is the same use of the sign of the Lords Supper Matth. 26 26. Iesus took bread and blessed and brake it and gave it to his Disciples and said Take Eat This is my Body What our Saviour took that he blessed what he blessed that he brake what he brake he delivered to the Disciples what he delivered to them of that he said This is my Body But it was Bread that he took the Evangelist so saith and Bread therefore that he blessed Bread that he brake Bread that he delivered and Bread consequently of which he said This is my Body The universal custom of the Scripture in all places where like kinde of speaking is used plainly leades us to a figure see 1 Cor. 10. 4. The Hebrews wanting a proper word to set forth that which we mean by signifying do ever in stead of that use the word is When Ioseph had heard Pharaohs dream he saith The seven years of good corn are seven years of plenty and the seven thin ears seven years of dearth Gen. 41. 26 27. so the seven fat kine are seven years that is by way of signification and representation So Ezek. 37. 11. Dan. 2. 38. 7. 17. whence it comes that in the New Testament where the manner of speaking by the Hebrews is imitated the word is in matter of signs is used for the word signifie So in the Parable That which is sowed upon stony ground is he that heareth and after The seed is the Word Luk. 8. 11. the Reapers the Angels so I am the Vine Revel 17. 12. The ten Kings are ten horns Hagar is mount Sinai in Arabia 2. The Apostle Paul clearly goes before us in this interpretation for he saith the bread which we break is the communion of the body of Christ because it was appointed for a certain means of making us partakers of his body Our Saviour said long before viz. John 6. 63. that the flesh profiteth nothing that is the flesh by eating of it profits nothing for in no other sense can it be said to profit nothing See 2 Cor. 5. 16 17. Their Legend tels us that some Boyes getting by heart and pronouncing the words of Consecration Hoc est Corpus meum turned all the Bakers bread in the street into flesh In the Book of the Conformities of St Francis there is a miracle recorded for Transubstantiation that on a time Prier Francis