in notions and opinions as others do in other opinions but we use to count it great uncharitableness to charge all of a judgement with that which some being of that judgement do hold but if all of that judgement were of this mind the Author should be of it for he holdeth universal redemption yet I hope he doth not rest there nor own or reject others as they hold or hold not with him in that point but the Author misrepresents others judgements as well as the udgement of those that are for general redemption Page 199. He tells us those that differ from those that are for general redemption do evidently contradict and deny unto them most clear certain and undeniable truths and all that which they say concerning conditional reprobation freewil falling away and the like as relating to the children of the first Covenant will find that from the Scriptures which will justifie it The Author is very confident and profuse in his accusation of the Anti-Arminians and too highly exalts their opinions that are for universal redemption as if they were the very Gospel calling their opinions most clear certain and undeniable truths but what are their opinions that are most clear and undeniable truths why he saith their opinions of conditional reprobation freewil falling away and the like as relating to the children of the first covenant Let us hear their opinions and first of conditional reprobation The Arminiuns opinion is that there is no absolute and irrevocable but only conditional decree of predestination to damnation or salvation and that the number of the elect and reprobate is not so certain but that is may be diminished or augmented and that the primary cause of the decree of reprobation not of its execution is the praeconsideration and praevision of sin and not the meer will and pleasure of God And is their opinion such a plain and most undeniable truth their doctrine is such that notwithstanding Gods decrees either to life or death there might either none have been saved or none damned And according to their doctrine the grace of election is made voyd for if it were not Gods free will and pleasure that was the primary cause of the reprobates reprobation and non-election but works foreseen then consequently it was not Gods free will and pleasure that was the cause of the elects election but their works foreseen and then fare well that discriminating grace and love of God from all eternity neverthelesse we still make sin the cause of damnation but Gods free pleasure the cause of Gods non-electing and passing men by in his eternal counsels resolving to leave them in their sins and to condemnation for their sins Concerning free will the Arminians hold that there is a sufficient universal grace derived upon all men by which they may believe and be saved if they will And is this most clear and evident in the Scripture no the contrary is evident in the Scripture Isa 53.1 John 6.44 45. John 12.38 39 40. Page 205. He saith that the flesh of Christ may be received and eaten either worthily or unworthily men not distinguishing between Christs living body and his crucified body The Author if he had pleased might in this case have considered of the old distinction of the Martyrs of eating and receiving panem demini and panem dominum of that which is the sign and sacrament and the thing it self no man but the true believer eats of the bread of life the Lord Jesus for hic edere est credere by eating is meant believing but he saith they do not distinguish between Christs living body and crucified body Alas the same body of Jesus Christ that was crucified is a living body for it was impossible for that holy one to see corruption and it is not the meer body of Jesus Christ considered as living or crucified that saveth us as Christ telleth us in that case it is the spirit that quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing Page 225. He saith Abraham was justified before God by that faith wrought out in Christ his head The Scripture telleth us that by Christs obedience we are made righteous and that we are justified by his blood but no where that we are justified by the faith that is wrought out in Christ we are justified by his righteousness imputed to us not by the faith that Christ had the Author seemeth all along to have many wide mistakes about the righteousness by which we are justified when the Scripture telleth us we are justified by the faith of Christ the meaning is that we are justified by Christ believed in not that we are justified by the faith which he had And so he saith in the same 225. page that faith considered as abiding in Christ and not in us is that which properly justâ—fieth the believer But Christ though in some sense he had faith that is to say he trusted in the father that he would carry him through the work of bearing our sins and that he would so accept of his bearing the chastisement of our peace that he would deliver us from going down to the pit because of the ransome that he paid and believed that he should see his seed that the pleasure of the Lord should prosper in his hands yet he had not such faith as in Scripture is called saving and justifying faith for he was no sinner that he received another for his righteousnes The Author leaving the simplicity of the Gospel runs in vain and unscriptural notions in those things Page 291. He saith that Christs Disciples were called the children of the bride-chamber and yet then had no higher knowledg of him then in his fle shly glory and perfection The place he mâ—aneth is Matth. 9.15 which holdeth forth no such thing but what a forrowing there should be in the Disciples when they were deprived of Christs bodily presence but that was not a depriving of them of that which the Author calleth the first Image but â—â—vay what fleshly glory and perfection was 〈◊〉 Christ that the Disciples should know Christ only in that Alas he had no fleshly glory and perfection his visage was marred more then any of the sons of men Isa 52. never was so glorious a person so obscured as he was insomuch that the people said is not this the Carpenters son his fleshly glory and perfection was so little that those which looked only at that could see no form nor comeliness in him wherefore they should desire him let the Author have better thoughts of the Disciples then that they followed Christ and left all for him only for his fleshly glory and perfection no they saw him with better eyes they saw him to be Jehovah their righteousness the only begotten son of God full of grace and truth Page 300. He maketh this the great sin of those in the first Image that they set up the sons Kingdom in their hearts in competition with and opposition to the fathers View the Scriptures
born are transgressors from the womb and if leâ—t to our selves grow worse and worse revolt more and more and if what the Author saith were true then every man had power to keep himselfe from unbeliefe for to be sure that is one of the highest provocations for which God swears in his wrath men shall not enter into his rest And the Author here telleth us that men may keep themselves from such provocations and if they have power to keep themselves from unbelief then consequently they have power to believe then farewel the discriminating grace of God his making us to differ we know men have their Wil nots as wel as their Cannots there is both they will not and they cannot they want will and power there is both wilfulnesse and weaknesse such vile and miserable Creatures are we of our selves and let not the Author make our case better then is is let us have a care of Freewill Page 182. and 183. He saith men may have a feare of God to keep them from sinning against him and may have an experimental sense of the emptinesse of their good works to justifie them and yet neither be under the Law nor Believers and so it was with the Centurion who was neither under the Law nor a Believer until Peter came to him and this he speaks in reference to those that are usually called the Heathens But though the Heathen have such a light set up in their understandings according to which their consciences accuse them or excuse them yet where doth the Scripture say that the fear of God keeps them from sinning nay most of them have denied that there is a God that infinite first being of all things and then they could not through the fear of him be kept from sinning and the truth is no man but the true believer is truly kept from sinning through a true fear of God the fear of hell and wrath may be without a true fear of God the true feare of God is a peculiar benefit of the covenant of grace and how have the Heathens an experimental sense of the emptinesse of their good works to justifie them that know not of heaven or hell to come the businesse of justification before God and forgivenesse of sins is not in all their thoughts But let us come to the Centurion and try whether he were thus and whether he was neither acquainted with the Law nor was a Believer before Peter came to him and the tenth chapter of the Acts will resolve us in these things out of that Chapter we may gather that Cornelius was a Proselyte in his beliefe and Religion and so might be a true believer in Christ though he did not know that Christ was already come and therefore the Lord sent Peter to acquaint him with it and so ver 22. shewes us that this Cornelius was of good report among all the Jewes and the word which God sent unto the children of Israel preaching peace by Jesus Christ that word Peter told Cornelius he knew Acts 10.36 37. From all which it is plain that Cornelius was not to be reckoned among the Heathen and that he might be a believer in Christ before Peter câ—me to him he might believe in Christ as to come though he might not have light to believe that he was already come as he was taught afterwards by Peters Sermon Page 183. He saith Paul when he saith that he was alive once without the Law Rom. 7. shews that he lived in good conscience in such a state But when Paul saith he was alive without the law once his meaning is not that he was not acquainted with the Law that was written in Tables of stone but that he was not acquainted with the spirituality of the Law but only made an overly Exposition of it not knowing how the Law reached the thoughts and principles of the heart for otherwise Paul knew the Law and was no Heathen in that sense for he was an Hebrew of the Hebrewes a Jew by father and mother and circumcised the eighth day but it shewes how a man may have the outward knowledge of the Law and yet be without the inward and spiritual knowledge of it Page 197. He saith those that hold general redemption and their opposers that goe under the name of Orthodox doe both bear a true witnesse and a false one against another and both of them oppose and exclude upon divers grounds the true righteous seed that live by faith But they cannot be both in the right in that dispute either Christ did die for the whole race of mankind or he did not and either there is an election from all eternity of a certain number to grace and glory or there is not and so throughout that controversie so that I say they cannot be both in the right in these disputes Well but he saith they both oppose and exclude though upon divers grounds the true righteous feed that live by faith God forbid But if it be so is not the Author one of them for I am sure he holdeth general redemption as his book doth sufficiently witnesse and though those that hold universal redemption are surely mistaken in that yet it doth not follow that they and their opposers therein doe exclude the righteous seed that live by faith for most that hold universal redemption and those that oppose them agree in that to wit that he that truly believeth in Christ shall be saved and no other many who are mistaken about the extent of Christs death are yet sound in the Doctrine of Justification Page 198. He saith those that are for the general extent of Christs death finding the truth of their belief expressed in the Letter of the Gospel as indeed it is satisfie themselves in that and rest there thinking it sufficient to try and judge all men as they reject or own this literal knowledge of the Gospel I shall not mingle so many disputes together or else I might undertake to shew that general redemption is not expressed in the letter of the Gospel if by the letter the Author meanes the meaning and mind of the holy Ghost but that hath been sufficiently witnessed by the worthies of our times but yet this Author doth not doe well to charge all those of that judgement in general that they rest there and try or judge all men as they reject or own that Doctrine for though I have known some that have been so rigid yet it is not so with all there are those of that judgement that do not own all to be saints that believe general redemption neither do they disown others that differ from them in that point but notwithstanding their judgement in that particular they do own or disown men according to their faith in Christ and power of godliness neither do they as the Author saith rest there but hold the necessity of applying the blood of Christ and of a new birth though yet some of them may take up
Christ the Lord our righteousness and so the author tells us that ceasing from his fleshly principles he gets to neere and intimate communion with the Father so then it seemeth he had not such neere and intimate communion with the Father before but we do believe that the very human nature of Christ had of Christ had alwaies very neer intimate communion with the Father excepting the time when it pleased the Father to bruise him and put him to grief when he made his soule an offering for our sins then God hid his face from him that made him cry out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Page 97. He makes Abrahams offering up Isaac spoken of James 2. To hold forth his offering up the first image I need not say much to throw downe his exposition of that place but I shall onely say this that if that act of his were the throwing up of the first image then it should seeme Abraham had not offered it up before and so according to the authors way was not in a saving state which if it were needfull might abundantly be confuted out of Genesis But Page 98. He saith Abraham herein was but the type or figure of Christ who performed this in himself and this act of obedience being imputed to us presents us righteous and without â—lame before the Throne of God But surely if we will put an allegoricall sense upon this passage of Abrahams offering up his son Isaac they do better that make Abraham to represent God the Father herein that offered his Isaac gave his Isaac for a sacrifice for our sins the beloved son in whom he was so well pleased but this author makes Christ both Abraham and Isaac he makes Isaac his fleshly part but I wold have the author follow his allegories a little better and wiselier not to plainly contradict the holy Ghost in his allegories for Gal 4. The holy ghost maketh Ishmael to signifie the covenant of workes and Isaac the covenant of grace and verse 28. So we as Isaac was are the Children of the promise so that when the holy ghost makes Isaac to signifie the new covenant the author is too bold to make him signifie the law and the offering of him to signifie the offering up of a legall state And so this author saith more plainly Page 99. That Christ actually sacrificed the true Isaac crucifiing in himselfe the life of his fleshly seed and legall principles Thus we see how he thwarts the holy ghost who will have Isaac to hold forth the new covenant the free woman the Ierusalem that is above and to hold forth those that are borne after the spirit in that 4. Galath But this author will needs have Isaac to signifie the fleshly seed and legall principles Page 99. He saith that Christ and his whole seed enter into rest by Faith But the author must have a care how he rank Christ and the Saints together and liken them in believing we come to him that is beleive in him and so our troubled weary heavy laden souls enter into rest Matt. 11.28 And there is no such way in the world to get rest for a weary soule but by faith in Christ applying his blood which speaketh better things then the blood of Abel but how Christ needes to enter into rest by faith as we sinfull creatures do is a paradox but as I said before he levels the Lord Jesus and mightily debases him Page 103. He saith that which in the first sense Christs naturall man was a sufferer in consisted in the weakness and disabilitie which was brought upon his fleshly mind to resist the powerfull workings of his faith or spirituall minde A strange passage that Christ had a fleshly carnall minde in him as well as a spirituall minde but we believe there was no fleshly mind in our Redeemer and wonder that this author is so bold as to affirme it and he maketh it the worke of his death and cross to subdue his fleshly minde and if there were such a fleshly mind in Christ Jesus it was no suffering and affliction to have that taken away but rather a great mercy but far be it from us to have such low and mean and base thoughts of our deare Saviour But in the same 103. Page He saith that Christ was thus brought into such a frame of spirit that he was disabled from doing any thing against the truth and thereby qualified to do all for the truth As if there was a time when Christ had such a frame of spirit that he might have acted against the truth and will of God but by taking up the higher image was disinabled from doing so and before that time was not qualified to do all things for the truth and he adds in the same place that this profitable weakness and disability namely not to do any thing against the truth came not all at once upon Christs naturall man but gradually then this author would make him for a time to be in great danger of sinning but that by degrees he grew disinabled from sinning And Page 104. He saith thus in this first part of Christs passive obedience he through the law becomes dead to the law through the law of the spirit of life in the second Adam becomes dead to the law and life of the first fulfilling the whole law of righteousness by being rendred utterly unable to perform one tittle of it in mans first activity and sufficiency or as left alone to the grace strength received by his first covenant principles Let us examine how Christ by the law became dead to the law Paul indeed saith thus of himselfe Gal 2.19 I through the law am dead to the law that is seeing the law spirituality and my owne weakness to keep it that if I be under the law I must needs be under the curse I am dead to the law that is will not put my selfe under it as a covenant of workes to doe it and live but I seeke to have my life hid with Christ in God and to have him to be the end of the law for righteousness to me but Christ could not be dead to the law in this respect for he was able to performe every tittle of it which Paul and we were not able to doe but I say Christ needed not as we to fly from the law as that which is weake and unable through the flesh and inability in us to keep it to bring us unto life and so to goe unto another for righteousness and life and he goes on to make Christ one while keeping the law out of strength that he received by first Covernant principles but afterwards he faith he could not performe one tittle of it as left to those principles thus doth he represent Christ one while obeying upon the principles of the Covenant of works another while he could not obey at upon these principles running into these notions about Christ by slighting the
to have new hearts should rather question whether they themselves be so sanctified and their hearts so really and actually changed as to have new hearts and spirits and when we come to examine this very thing we shall finde that it is not such an ordinarie thing to have the heart which by nature is so desperately wicked to be so really and actually changed though the life may be much changed yet the heart may be the same even like a painted Sepulchre beautiful without but within full of dead mens bones but for this he maketh use of 2 Pet. 2.20 of mens escaping the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ who yet may be againe intangled in them But doth the Author know no difference between mens hearing of Christs calling for holinesse and departing from iniquity in the preaching of the Gospel that they do now leave their former prophaneness and pollutions hoping to get heaven or make themselves worthy of Christ by this their reformation I say is there no difference between this and the having of the heart really and actually changeed because Herod did many things and heard John Baptist gladly doth it therefore follow that he was so sanctified as to have his heart really and actually changed and purified Acts 15.9 the heart is purified only by true faith in Christ Jesus the life may be reformed by education by convictions of conscience and by a common head and notional knowledg of the Gospel and of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ yet I confess in a good sense the hearts of some natural men may be said to be changeed but it must be very warily understood Another place he quotes for this attainment of the matural man is Heb. 6. Those that tasted of the heavenly gift and yet might fall away c. What if these are said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 enlightened so was Balaam and others that I hope were never justified and sanctified by Christ we do not deny but that the natural man may have illumination what if they are said to have tasted of the heavenly gift and if this heavenly gift be Christ himselfe men may tast of Christ as Cooks do of their sauce which they spit out again men may come to try Religion and tast Christ and not having a pallat that savours the things of the spirit may not like him there is a great difference betweene the unbelievers tasting and the true believers experience what if they are said to be made partakers of the Holy Ghost that may be said of any man that is any way enlightened by the Holy Ghost and partakers of his common gifts only yea Bezaliel and Aholiab are said to be filled with the Spirit of God when yet it was but to enable them to devise cunning works in gold and in silver and in brasse Exod. 31.3.4 What if they tasted of the good Word of God I question not but a natural man may do so as Herod that heard John Baptist gladly which shewed he was affected with the word and tasted some sweetnesse in it And what if they tasted the powers of the world to come and have often been scared as Felix was Acts 24.25 when Paul reasoned of the Judgement to come Felix trembled and so may other natural men do but doth this Scripture say as the Author doth that they received Christ in their hearts as their Lord and Christ and were made the righteousnesse of God in him this is the thing that we deny any natural man attaines to but we grant they may tast of the heavenly gift and of the powers of the world to come as that place in the 6. Hebr. doth declare Page 134. he saith These in the first Image are righteous workers according to the Law in the most Gospel administration of it but at the bottome are still upon the tenure and account of debt What is the most Gospel like administration of the Law but Christs fulfilling of it for us and taking the Law now into his own hands and prescribing the obedience the Law requires as duty to him the Lord our righteousnesse so that there is a modification of the Law to the fallen estate of man that Christ now doth not propound the Law to us as a Covenant of works that we should seek righteousnesse to justifie us by the works of the Law but he himself is made of God unto us righteousnesse and his blood cleanseth us from all sin and now will have us obey the Law as he exhibits it to us in the way of the Gospel that we should now obey out of love thankfulnesse and obedience to our Redeemer and this is the Gospel and Christs administration of the Law but this Author tells us that all the bottome they are upon the account and tenure of debt and that they are but still under the first Covenant which is a meer contradiction for the obeying of the Law in the most Gospel like administration of it implyes a disclaiming our own righteousnesse and confidence in our owne obedience and obeying it upon Gospel principles even our love and duty to Christ that constraineth us to do his will and what is acceptable in his sight and I would ask the Author whether those that came into his higher image are not to obey the Law and if so surely he will say they must obey it in the most Gospel like administration of it and then the obedience of them both are alike the confounding of Law and Gospel doth a little hang in this Authors light Page 136. He saith This sort of men were incorporated with the true spiritual seed in every one of the seven Churches mentioned Revelations 2. 3. Chapters But I pray were the Laodiceans that were neither hot nor cold that said they had need of nothing and knew not they were miserable and poor and blind and naked did this frame of spirit shew them to be made the righteousnesse of God in Christ and to be sanctified in Christ Jesus which is the question under debate but do not these things rather shew the contrary and that they had but a name to be thus but were dead and without Christ and Philadelphia which was one of the seven Churches doth the Lord say there were any of that Church that were not in a saving state are any enemies to the Crosse of Christ detected in that Church let the Author read Revel 3.7 to 13. and then let him tell us how he cometh to know that there were such in that Church as were not true Saints and the spiritual seed I am sure he that is holy and true in his message to them saith no such thing findes no such fault with them as he doth with the rest of the Churches but truly whatsoever this Author saith it would have been well if all the members of all those Churches had been such as have Christ to be the Lord their righteousnesse and truly received Christ
were Covered for ever by the robe of Christs righteousness let us compare Scripture with Scripture Psal 32.1.2 with this place where 't is said Blessed is he whose transgressions are forgiven whose sin is covered blessed is the man to whom the Lord imputeth not iniquity where the Holy Ghost plainly maketh it a state of blessednesse and salvation to have our iniquities forgiven and our sins covered that so the Analogy of faith and harmony that one Scripture hath with another teacheth us how to understand that Scripture to wit that it was the elect among the Jewes whose iniquities were truly forgiven the rest were forgiven in the sense there declared that is to say so as they were not presently destroyed neither did God stir up all his wrath but when ever he punished that people yet he left a seed he spared some he did not deal with them as with Sodome nor make them like to Gomorrah but why doth the Author think that all the Jewes were in that state which he calls the first image it s said ver 36.37 That they flattered God with their mouths and lyed to him with their tongues and their heart was not right with him how were they then sanctified by a real and actual change of the heart which the Author makes the first image yea ver 10. of that Psalm it s said they refused to walk in Gods Law how then were they in this state that the Author talks on they would have their high places and graven images ver 58. surely those were none of the Authors Images Page 173. He saith The Gyants spoken of Gen. 6. were in the first image We have seen before what he maketh the first image to be to wit to receive Christ into the heart as Lord and Christ in his first appearance and to eat his flesh and drink his blood and doth any body think these Gyants did so they were called Gyants because of their great statute and Lion-like strength and disposition not I wis for any holinesse they had more then other men for holinesse and grace they might shake hands with their brother Goliah whom David slew they were men of renown for the greatnesse and strength of their bodies not for the goodnesse and holinesse of their hearts truly those Gyants are much beholden to this Author for the good opinion he hath of them for other men think they were wicked and prophane men that lived without God in the world and I would fain have him shew us one expression in all that 6. of Gen. that sheweth them to be in such a state as he calls the first image Page 185. and 186. That those that are in the first image are taken out of that stock the first Adam and are transplanted into the good Olive tree the man Christ Jesus and made to partake of the fatnesse thereof Rom. 11. becoming thereby wholly a right seed Jer. 2.21 a holy and righteous seed in the principles and operations of their mind answerable to the holy and righteous flesh of Christ and are taught to see the need of coming to God and being accepted with him in the sacrifice or death of Christ who as considered as coming in the flesh is given to them for a new head and root yet he saith they become exalters of this their legall righteousnesse against the excellency of the knowledge of the Crosse of Christ Though Rom. 11. hath another meaning yet let us take it in his sense and see what it will hold forth in this matter to be transplanted into Christ and to partake of the fatnesse of that good Olive tree surely this is a saveing state a man cannot be taken out of the old Adam and be truly transplanted into Christ but he must be grafted upon the righteousnesse of Christ and planted into the likenesse of his death spoken of Romans 6. and to partake of Christs fatnesse is to receive of his fulness and grace for grace to derive quickning strengthening sanctifying comforting and all grace from Christ a blessed state and for holinesse he saith they are answerable to the holy and righteous flesh of Christ good still and I would fain see such a man that is thus is not in a saving state I am sure the Gyants he talked on before were far enough from this state and I would we could all finde such principles and operations of minde in us that the same minde were in us that was in Christ Jesus Philip. 2.5 That we had the same minde for humility the same minde for patience the same minde for submission to the Fathers will the same minde for self-deniall the same minde for contentment in all estates the same minde for publique Spiritedness the same minde for tender love and affections to the Saintes the same minde for pitty and compassion to mens soules But truly instead of these notions that the naturall man may have principles and operations of minde answerable to the holy and righteous flesh of Christ we should rather examine our own conformity unto him and mourn for our short coming in these things who should have the same minde in us that also was in Christ Jesus And he thinketh these in the first image are taught too he saith to see their neede of being accepted in the beloved in the sacrifice or death of Christ good still and surely they that are thus taught of God to see their owne righteousness a covering too scant for them and look truly to be accepted in Christ are built upon the Rock that the gates of hell shall not prevaile against but he saith for all this they became exalters of this their legall righteousness against the excellency of the knowledge of the crosse of Christ what doth he meane by their legall righteousness which they exalt no other but the righteousness of Christ who he supposeth to be their legall righteousness who are in the first image and their Evangelicall righteousness who are in his second image for he maketh it all one to have this kind of righteousness either inherent in us or by Christ imputed to us and maketh the trusting to it whether as inherent in us or as inherent in Christ and made ours by imputation to be a trusting in our owne righteousness and mans righteousness for that kind of righteousness in Christ he maketh but mans righteousness and but flesh a dangerous mistake but the Scripture distinguisheth between them in many places as Rom. 8.3.4 and Rom. 3.20 verse and so on and so he distinguisheth that sort of righteousnesse which was in Christ as he fulfilled the Law and bear the curse of it for us to be but mans righteousnesse and imputed to those that shall never be saved and the righteousness of Christ as he was taken up into the higher image he calls the righteousnesse of God not considering the reason why the righteousness of Christ is called Gods righteousnesse in many places of Scripture as 1. because it is the righteousnesse of
and it may be in the same page tells us they go about to establish their own righteousness To conclude this Chapter after the Author hath so cryed up the attainments of men in his first image as we have seen when he hath affirmed them to be called out of the world Christ made their righteousnesse in a way of justification and told us how they are one flesh one body with Christ knit and married to Christ faithful walkers with Christ he tells us very fairly at last Page 361. That these are the devills subjects though he telleth us in that same page that they owne themselves in a professed subjection and conformity to the law of God that is to what is righteous holy and good in its nature and not onely as it is within themselves but as they are made righteous in another viz. Jesus Christ the righteous Truly we never thought the devill had such subjects but the Author could not this Gordian knot if he were set about it for if righteous in Christ in a way of justification and sanctified by his blood how are they the devills subjects nay the Author before had told us they were Christs subjects and a man at the same time cannot be Christs subject and the devils subject a man is translated from the power of darknesse when he is translated into the Kingdome of Christ Thus have we examined the Authors notions concerning men in his first image so full of contradiction to themselves and the truth Now to examine his doctrine about men in his higher image which he maketh a saving state shall be the work of the next Chapter CHAP. IV. Examines the Authors doctrine about his higher Image which he counts a saving state HE tels us Page 7. That this higher Image is the communion of the Holy Ghost 2 Cor. 13.14 which Paul wishes unto them after the grace they had shared in from Jesus Christ our Lord as the common salvation Jude 3. and as the fruit of the love of God the Father This shews the Author to be a Critick indeed as if a man might have the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ and yet be shut out for ever from the love of God the Father and the communion of the Holy Ghost but what is it to have the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ but to have the pardoning strengthning sanctifying quickning grace of the Lord Jesus and he that hath this to be sure hath the love of God he both loveth God and God loveth him and this communion of the Holy Ghost is an effect of the love of God and the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ who giveth the blessed Spirit to those who are partakers of his grace and righteousnesse to sanctifie them wholly comfort them lead them into all truth and seale them to the day of redemption and the common salvation spoken of Jude 3. which the Authour quotes is the grace of God which bringeth salvation to all true Believers Gentiles as well as Jews called there common because this righteousness of God which is by faith in Jesus Christ is upon all and unto all them that believe whether Jews or Gentiles for the same Lord is rich in mercy to justifie and save all that believe on him though they be not Jews by nature but sinners of the Gentiles in this respect is the grace and righteousness that is in Christ called common salvation and not that it is common to them that are eternally saved and to them that perish Page 58. He describes the higher Image to be a beholding of Gods very similitude open and bare faced But is this saving faith to be beholding Gods very similitude open and bare faced as the Authors phrase is Alas we can have no access to him as an absolute God with comfort and for salvation without relation to a Mediator sesus the surety of the better Testament John 14.6 No man commeth to the father but by him and he saveth them that come to God by him Hebr. 7.25 that is true saving faith not the seeing of Gods similitude open and bare faced but how much better doth the Apostle describe faith and saving grace 2 Cor. 4.6 where he calleth it Gods shining into our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ There is a very neere approach to God that the Saints shall have in glory and a glorious view of him in the beatifical vision in glory but that is not faith but glorification not here but hereafter as God told Moses Exod. 33. No man shall see my face and live But blessed be the Lord for ever that he puts us into the clift of the Rock the Lord Jesus and there we see his goodnesse passing before us and hear him proclaming his name the Lord the Lord God gratious and abundant in mercy and that by beleiving in Christ we are his children and that because we are thus his sons he sendeth the spirit of his son into our hearts whereby we can call him Abba Father this is unspeakable comfort to us in our present state that we thus know that we are now the sons of God though yet it doth not fully appear to us what we shall be but we know that when he shall appear even Jesus Christ the righteous that we shall be like him and see him as he is as 1 John 3.3 and however others pretend to see God in his very similitude open and bare faced we confess as 1 Cor. 13.12 that we now see but through a glass darkly though we yet expect at that day break of eternal brightness in Heaven to see face to face and know as we are known That which the Author saith of saving faith and the higher Image p. 75 76. we will grant taking it in a good sense and with this caution that what he there saith is improperly called the newbirth but rather glorification and that his expressions are too liable to mistakes but for quietness sake we will pass them by and come to Page 139. He saith these in the higher Image are under the ministery of Christs second appear ance wherein he doth not only appear a King of righteousness conveying a seed of righteousness answerable to that perfection commanded by the Law but also a King of peace conveying a seed of everlasting peace But the Author must know that where Christ is to any soul a King of righteousnesse he is also a King of peace The peace of God which passeth all understanding for its sweetness and comfort is an effect of Christs righteousness and so saith the Scripture Isaiah 30.17 the work of righteousness shall be peace to wit peace with God the effect of righteousness to wit Christs righteousness quietness and assurance for ever for as Rom. 5.1 being justified by faith that is by Christ and his righteousness believed in we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ so that this is the difference