SOCINIANISME in the Fundamentall point of Justification discovered and confuted Or an Answer to a written Pamphlet maintaining that faith is in a proper sense without a trope imputed to Beleevers in justification Wherein The Socinian fallacies are discovered and confuted and the true Christian Doctrine maintained viz. That the righteousnesse by which true beleevers are justified before God is the perfect righteousnesse and obedience which the Lord Iesus Christ God and man did performe to the Law of God both in his life and death By George Walker B of Divinity and Pastor of S. Iohn the Euangelists Church in Watling-street London A man that is an Hereticke after the first and second admonition reiect knowing that he that is such is subverted and sinneth being condemned of himselfe Tit. 3.10 11. LONDON Printed by R. O. for Iohn Bartlet at the Signe of the gilt Cup in Pauls Church-yard neare S. Augustins Gate 1641. To his Reverend Brethren the Godly Orthodox Pastors and Preachers of Gods Word in and about the City of London the Author of this brief discovery and confutation wisheth all increase of Grace peace and happinesse with the abundance of blessings from God on their faithfull labours MY Reverend and dearely beloved Brethren it is not unknown to divers of you what great conflicts I have had with the adversaries of this Socinian Faction about this main fundamentall point of Justification what pains I have taken to vindicate the truth above six and twenty yeares agoe from the opposition and subtile Sophistry of a cunning adversary who by the fame and opinion which men had of his great Learning and no lesse Piety had drawn many zealous Professors of Religion into some liking of his Errours His written Pamphlets went currently through the City and were to be found in the hands of many men in which he First utterly renounced the Law in whole and part performed by our selves or any other in our stead for the justifying of us in the sight of God Secondly rejected as a meere device of our late Divines the imputation of Christs righteousnesse and satisfaction not onely his habituall righteousnesse but also his whole obedience both active and passive and affirmed it to be a thing wherof there was no testimony or proof in Scripture nor any necessary end or use thereof Thirdly he professed and undertook to prove thot Faith even the act of beleeving and trusting in Christ for salvation after a generall and confused manner as a favourite of God and not as a perfect satisfyer of his justice and just Law is that which God accounts and accepts for righteousnesse to justification in stead of righteousnesse and perfect obedience performed to the will and Law of God either by Christ or our selves These and divers other errors which were here and there interlaced I did at the first discover in some sermons to be no Doctrines of sacred Truth by him digged out of the deep mines of holy Scripture and newly brought to light as his seduced Disciples proclaymed them to be for the inlightning of the blind world in these last dayes of darknesse and perillous times but the old errors and Heresies of Servetus and Socinus newly revived and raked out of hell by Arminius Bertius and others of their Faction Divers of his Friends who had begun to imbrace his opinion were not a little terrified at the hearing of these things and earnestly besought me to give him a meeting who at that time was to me unknown by face I condescended to their desire but wheras I came with an heart full of tender compassion and with Prayers in my mouth and teares in mine eyes layd open before him the danger of his errors and the evill and mischiefe which by meanes of his obstinate persisting in them might accrue to himselfe and those who were by him seduced and misled he on the contrary hardened his heart to maintain per fas et nefas and dolo malo his foresaid erroneous opinions shewing out of Luther on the Galatians some words which seemed to favour his error and to exclude the righteousnesse of the Law from justification which words he applyed to the righteousnesse of the Law performed by Christ for us and did most stiffly so urge them but the words which immediately followed to wit that God justifies us by the righteousnesse of his Son Jesus Christ and by his fulfilling of the Law for us he covered with his fingers till I pluckt the Book out of his hands and read them to those that were present whereby he was much confounded Now the issue of my fair and Christian dealing with him and of my modest and mild opposing of him without such sharpnesse as the cause and his carriage did require was the same which the gentle behaviour of Orthodox Divines towards perverse Hereticks hath commonly had in all former ages For his Factious disciples did impute it to the weaknesse of my Cause and to his arguments convincing my Conscience that his opinions were not so dangerous as I had censured them to be but rather unreprovable yea and laudable And upon my departure out of the City immediately after to Cambridge whither my occasions called me in my absence they reported that at our meeting he did so convince and confound me with strong arguments that I humbled my selfe to him confessed my ignorance imbraced his opinions and promised to hold and maintaine them till death This wicked and Jesuiticall policy which they used to retaine divers of his disciples who wer ready to fall off from him to recall those who were fallen off already did produce a quite contrary effect For when I returned again to the City and was saluted as a Socinian onvert and informed of their false reports lying forgeries I was inflamed with a double desire to vindicate both the truth of God and mine own reputation from their slanderous aspersions and hereupon I betook my selfe to handle and expound that place of Scripture Rom. 5.17 18 19. which doth most pithily and plainly set forth the Doctrine of Justification by the communion of Christs righteousnes and obedience And because I discerned in mine Adversaries a perverse Hereticall spirit and that they had made lyes their refuge and did sinne being condemned of themselves I did with all zeale confute their errours lay open the deadly poyson and malignity of them and cloath them with such reproachfull titles as divers grave and learned Divines of the best reformed Churches had before shaped and fitted to them I proved them to be profane and abominable Doctrine even the damned Heresie of Servetus and Socinus as Sibrandus Lubertus had before stiled them And that their denying of the reciprocall imputation of Christs righteousnesse and satisfaction to the faithfull and of their sinnes to Christ was impiety and blasphemy as learned Beza calls it Though by this meanes my adversaries were enraged and did suggest into the eares and minds of many godly people in the
no man can be legally justified but by his owne personall righteousnesse Evangelicall righteousnesse is CHRISTS perfect righteousnesse and fulfilling of the Law in the behalfe of all the elect and faithfull It was not the Law nor our works of the Law which moved GOD to give CHRIST to be our surety and redeemer but he of his owne free love and bounty gave Christ and Christ the Sonne of GOD out of his love humbled himselfe to become man and to fulfill the law for us Neither doe wee obtaine Communion of Christs satisfaction and righteousnesse by the workes of the Law but by the Gospell preached believed as the Apostle teacheth Gal. 3.2 And therefore though Christ his righteousnes be a perfect fulfilling of all obedience which the law requires of man GOD did exact of him every farthing of our debt both in active and passive obedience and in respect of the matter and substance his satisfaction may be called after a sort legall and is so called by Luther yet as it was for us not for himselfe and performed by him our head not by every one of us in our owne persons and is received and applied by Faith not by our workes of the Law and is brought unto us by the Gospell not by the Law and is given to us freely by GODS grace not merited or procured by any thing in our selves so it is not legall but Evangelicall and GODS justifying of us and counting us righteous by it is not a proceeding upon legall grounds nor pronouncing us legally just as this calumniator doth either foolishly imagine or falsely slander and misreport our Doctrine Fiftly in arguing for his owne false and forged sense of the word Justification he hath three reasons all which are for us and prove our Doctrine not his opinion For if this make a sense of the word Justification good because it doth intimate the former guiltinesse of him that is justified as wel as it doth discharge him from all punishment which is his first reason then is our Doctrine of justification by imputation of Christs satisfaction for all our sinnes very good and sound for it intimates a guiltinesse in him who is to bee iustified as well as a discharge from punishment Secondly we doe not plead for our iustification any consideration according to the Law that is wee doe not plead our owne innocency nor satisfaction and righteousnes performed in our own persons but we plead more then somewhat done for us even all Christs obedience active and passive by GODS free grace communicated to us not obtained or merited by our works of the law Thirdly though the law iustifies no sinner but threatens the curse death and condemnation as the due reward of the transgressors of it Yet it iustifies all who are free from all sinnes committed against it and are made righteous by the perfect fulfilling of it to the utmost And therefore when the Gospell hath brought us to the Communion of Christs full satisfaction by which we are made free from all sinne and perfect fulfillers of the law in him our head as GOD doth forgive us our sinnes and counts us righteous so the law is no more against us 1 Tim. 1.9 but is witnesse for us that in Christ we are worthy of remission and iustification By this are manifest the grosse errours and absurdities which he uttereth in this first part of his preparative Chapter But that his ignorance in the Doctrine of justification may more fully appeare I will lay downe the severall significations of the words justification and justifying wherein the Spirit of God doth use them in the holy Scriptures First the word iustifie and iustification signifie making men righteous or constituting or seting them in the state of righteousnesse This signification is justified by several testimonies of Scripture as Rom. 5.19 Where many are said to be made or constituted righteous by the obedience of Christ even as by Adams disobedience many were made sinners and 1 Cor. 1.30 and 2 Cor. 5.21 Where Christ is said to bee made unto us righteousnesse and wee are said to be made the righteousnesse of God in him And Rom. 3.24 and 4 5. Where we are said to be iustified freely by his grace through the redemption which is in Christ. And God is said to justifie the ungodly which cannot be meant of counting judging and pronouncing but of making them righteous by the Communion of Christs righteousnesse For to iustifie the wicked by judging and pronouncing them righteous without making them such is aoâ—mination to the LORD Prov. 17.15 And in this sense Preachers of GODS Word are as instruments under GOD said to iustifie many by bringing them unto righteousnesse and are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 iustifiers Dan. 12.3 This iustifying wee may very fitly call radicall or fundamentall iustification This Luther and other learned Divines call actionem individuam because it is GODS action of communicating Christs righteousnesse in a moment and not by degrees successively and in it men are mere patients and do not worke with GOD no more then Adam did in GODS first creating of him upright in his Image Even regenerate Infants may thus be iustified and are iustified before they actually beleeve Secondly the word iustifie signifieth GODS iustifying of men by Faith that is his counting and reputing them righteous upon their actuall beleeving and his enableing them to feele themselves partakers of the righteousnesse of Christ and to enioy it by Faith in this sense the word is used Rom. 4. Where GOD is said to iustifie us by imputing righteousnesse and counting Faith for righteousnesse that is counting a true beleever a righteous person And thus the word is to bee taken where we are said to bee iustified by Faith without the workes of the Law The Apostle doth much urge and presse this iustification Rom 4 and Gal. 3. because though in this taken actively GOD onely acteth yet taken passively as it is received of us and we by Faith feele and discerne in what account we are with GOD and by beleeving enioy Christs satisfaction for remission of sinnes and for righteousnes wee may be said to worke with GOD by way of receiving as a begging hand doth in receiving gifts freely given and put into it This iustifying doth necessarily presuppose the former and doth assure us of it For the iust GOD whose iudgement is according to truth cannot râ—pute us righteous till we have communion of Christs righteousnesse and be thereby truly righteous And this Justification Divines call imputative It springs from the former as from the root and is builded on it as on the foundation Thirdly this word iustifie signifies a manifesting and declaring of men to be righteous and iustified and that three wayes First in foro conscientiae in the court or iudgement of our own conscience when a man being troubled in his conscience with the sight of his sinnes and his want of righteousnesse after humble prayer and poenitent seeking
they bid their owne workes of the Law adiew and do no more dreame of iustification by them Secondly that GOD for the cure of their weak consciences tells them in the Gospell that if they beleeve in Christ this beleeving shall bee as good as a perfect compleat righteousnesse by this hee would make GOD a pure Socinian one who takes the Crowne from Christ and the righteousnes from GOD and man and sets it on the head of mans Faith which in the best beleevers and even in Abraham himselfe was mingled with much doubting and many infirmities In a word though all Orthodox Divines doe according to the Scriptures acknowledge that upon a mans beleeving truly in Christ GOD doth impute to him the perfect and compleat righteousnes of Christ which is made his before he can truly apply it by Faith Yet it can never enter into the heart of a true Christian but his soule will abhorre to thinke that any mans beleeving should bee to him as good as perfect compleat righteousnes or that GOD should accept it in stead of perfect righteousnesse and rather then the righteousnes of Christ GOD and man who is made unto us of GOD righteousnes 1 Cor. 1.30 and in whom we are found to have the righteousnes of GOD by faith Philip. 3.9 To conclude this passage let me adde this as a foule absurdity For if hee speake by experience that conscience leads men naturally to thinke that there can be no iustification without righteousnesse which is a perfect fulfilling of the Law Which I confesse my conscience and my reason tell mee and GODS word teacheth mee plainely Then what is become of his conscience who contrary to all truth and reason and the common conscience of all men will teach iustification without any true righteousnesse at all either of Christ or our owne and will crowne mans weak Faith with the Crown of righteousnesse which onely belongs to Christ and his perfect obedience Socinianisme SO that now the state and drift of the question is not either First whether Faith without an object or as separated from Christ bee imputed for righteousnesse for such a Faith doubtles in the point of justification was never dreamt of by any man that kept his 〈◊〉 company men may as well fancy a living man without a soulâ— or a wise man without his witts as a Faith without an object much lesse was such a Faith conceived by any man to bee imputed for righteousnesse Christianisme IN the fourth part or passage he first propounds five foolish quaeres which he denieth to concerne the state of the question Secondly he propounds a sixt quaere and that in plaine and precise termes hee affirmes I will first particularly answere the 5. quaeres and after lay downe the â—iâ—t at large and addresse my selfe to the confutation of his discourse upon it And first whereas he pronounceth him a mad man who dreames of faith without Christ the object or thinks that faith which believes not in Christ should be imputed for righteousnesse Here I must be bold to put him in mind that thus he dreames in the next Chapter where he boldly affirmes and by divers arguments laboureth to prove that the Faith of Abraham which was imputed to him for righteousnes was not a beleeving in Christ neither was Christ and his righteousnes the object of it And therefore by his owne confession and his owne wordes hee doth there play the mad man and keepes not his wits company but his fancy runs wild while he strives to prove that Abrahams Faith imputed to him for righteousnesse was not a beleeving in Christ. The second Quaere NEither is it any part of the intent of the question to enquire whether Faith bee the meritorious cause of a mans justification For both they that affirme and they that deny the imputation of Faith for righteousnes deny the meritoriousnes of Faith every way how ever it is true that they thaâ— would seeme most to disclaime it and cast it further from them doe yet in some of their most beloved tenets draw very neare unto it as will afterwards appeare Answer HEre behold either grosse ignorance or wilfull lying against knowledge and conscience For all the learned know that Faith and beleeving are held by the Church of Rome to be a principall part of mans righteousnesse and workes which GOD imputes and accounts meritorious of justification and of eternall life ex condigno Yea he himselfe in the passage next before hath plainely affirmed that Faith to him that beleeveth as Abraham did is as good as perfect and compleat righteousnes which if it be true then Faith must needs be as perfect and compleat righteousnesse is the meritorious cause of justification And therefore that which he here saith is verified in himselfe though he would seeme most to disclaime the merit of Faith and to cast it furthest from him yet in some of his most beloved tenets hee drawes very neare to it yea hee embraceth it with his heart in his whole discourse the maine drift whereof is to exalt Faith into the place of Christs most meritorious righteousnesse and to put the Crowne upon it For what can be imagined more meritorious of justification then that which GOD in a proper sense judgeth and counteth for righteousnes and for which he doth justifie men and counts them righteous The third Quaere NEither is it the question whether faith be the formall cause of justification that is whether GOD doth justifie a man with his faith as a Painter makes a wall white with whitenes or as a Master makes his Scholler learned with knowledge or learning conveyed into him for both parties make the forme of justification to be somewhat really different from Faith which is the genuine tenet of Arminius Answer THis quere is very ridiculous for to imagine a quality or act in man to be the formall cause of justification which is GODS act is the fancy of a distempered braine and the conceit of a mad man His exposition of his quaere shews his want of Logicall skill For the whitenesse wherewith the Painter makes a wall white is a forme introduced into the wall it is not the formall cause of his action of painting and so learning produced in a scholler is forma docti the forme of a Scholler as hee is made learned not the formall cause of his masters teaching surely his expounding of his quaere by such dissonant similitudes sheweth that hee had need of a Master to teach him some better knowledg and learning and to set on him some better stamp and superscription of rationall authority His phrase of learning conveyed is somewhat improper for learning is not conveyed into a Scholer but produced and begotten in him Let him not therefore condemne tropes of speech seeing he himselfe can and doth often speak tropically and improperly But to come home to his quaere If by justification hee meanes imputative justification in which GOD justifies a man by imputing
righteousnesse to him and man is justified by believing that GOD counts him righteous in Christ then wee deny not that faith in some respect is the formall cause of justification For in this justification taken passively as it is mans receiving by faith that which GOD imputes to him that is as it is a mans believing that God reckons him among the righteous and counts him to be in the state of a justified person so his actuall faith and believing is the forme of his justification But take Justification according to his owne opinion for GODS imputeing faith in a proper sense for righteousnesse Then is faith that somewhat by which a man stands in the state of a person Justified before GOD even his formall righteousnesse or that at least which is in stead of formall righteousnes Thus he is every way taken and entangled in his owne words Lastly what that is which hee saith is the genuine tenet of Arminius hee doth not expresse whether it be that faith is really different or not different from the forme of Justification for his words are included in a parenthesis which might very well be left out onely this I know that Arminius professeth this to be his genuine tenet That faith is imputed to the beleever for righteousnes sensu proprio non mâ—tonymico in a proper sense without a trope In Epist. ad Hippolitum de Collibus If elsewhere hee alters his tenet and writes otherwise It is but the common disease the vertigo and giddinesse of the Socinian faction to doe as here their fellow disciple doth in this his hovering and wavering discourse that is to say and gainesay affirme and deny the same things through the inconstancy of their windy braines and mindes unsetled The 4 Quaere NOr yet doth the question make any quaere at all whether Christ be the sole meritorious cause of justification of a sinner for both they that goe on the right hand of the question and they that goe on the left hand are knit together in the same mind and iudgment concerning this Answere WHosoever denyeth such a Spirituall union communion between Christ and the penitent and believing sinner iustified as doth make Christs righteousnesse and satisfaction to become his ransome and righteousnesse and to be imputed by GOD to him and to make him accepted by GOD as one cleane from the guilt of sinne and righteous in his sight This man denyeth Christ to be the meritorious cause of the Justification of a sinner For till Christ with his satisfaction be communicated and appropriated to the faithfull yea till his righteousnes be so made theirs and set on their skore that they have a right and interest in it Christ is no more meritorious of Justification to them then hee is to Infidels and reprobates for it is as impossible for Christ to be actually meritorious of Justification to any man who hath not an interest in him as for one mans money to ransom another who is a captive upon whose skore it was never set noâ— so much interest therein given to him that it is paid for him and accounted for his ransome 5 Quaere NEither doth the question as it is here propounded intâ—nd any dispute at all whether the active obedience of Christ falling in with the passive and considered in coniunction with it be that whereby Christ merited the Justification of sinners or that which GOD hath a principall respect and recourse unto in the Justification of sinners for this also is acknowledged on both sides at least by the greater partie of both Answere BVt while he denyes GODS communicating and imputeing Christs whole obedience hee denies the merit of them in our Justification and when hee affirmes that faith and not Christs righteousnesse is the thing imputed for righteousnesse to iustification he denies Christs obedience active and passive to be that which GOD hath a principall respect and recourse unto in the iustification of sinners and therefore here he contradicts himselfe and saith untruely that all sides hold the merit of Christs whole obedience when in his Doctrine he utterly overthrowes it The 6 Quaere which he alloweth and affirmeth BUt lastly the question in plaine tearmes is this whether the faith of him that truly beleeves in Christ or whether the righteousnesse of Christ himselfe that is that obedience that Christ performed to the morall Law consisting of all those severall and particular acts of righteousnesse wherein he obeyed in the letter and propriety of it bee that which GOD imputes to a beleever for righteousnesse in his justification so that he that beleeves is not righteous onely by account or by GODS gracious reputing and accepting of him for such but is rigidly literally and peremptorily righteous constituted and made as perfectly and compleatly and legally righteous as Christ himselfe no difference at all betweene them quoad veritatem but onely quoad modum the justified every whit as righteous as the iustifier both righteous with the selfesame individuall righteousnes onely this difference betweene one and the other the iustified weares iâ— as put upon him by another by imputation the iustifier weares it as put upon him by himselfe or by inherency That the Scriptures no where countenance any such imputation of the righteousnes of Christ I trust the spirit of truth directing and assisting to make manifest in the sequele of this discourse and to give good measure of truth to the Reader heaped up by testimonies from the Scripture pressed downe by the weight of many arguments demonstrations running over with the cleare approbation of many Authors learned and sound and every way greater then exception Multa fidem promissa levant Answere TO this question laid downe in plaine and precise termes I answer First that to move this question except with purpose to discover and oppose Socinus and his followers who affirme it and stand for imputation of faith in a proper sense for righteousnes is not to be tolerated among true Christians but to dispute for that damned errour which takes the Crowne from the all-sufficient righteousnes of Christ and sets on the head of mans weake faith is most hereticall impudency as in my whole answere I shall prove aboundantly Secondly his absurd expounding of Justification by Christs righteousnes imputed and how in this question the righteousnes of Christ and the iustifying of men by it are to be understood is a notable point either of calumny in slandering our doctrine and reporting it corruptly or of subtilty that when his opinion is proved to be blasphemous hee may have some starting holes through which hee may shift away and make an escape pleading that hee mistooke our Doctrine of being righteous by Christs righteousnesse imputed and ignorantly did oppose it First no man standing for the imputation of Christs righteousnes doth affirme that every particular act of Christ which hee performed was necessary to make up a perfect and sufficient righteousnes but that his righteousnesse containes in it all his acts
truth A shrewd nip if you marke it to you learned Doctors Preachers of the Citie of London who are great pretenders to the truth and yet the nearer that hee is come to the truth and makes his unlearned followers able to see it to the bottom as he hath often told us the further off hee is from your approbation If hee be thus bold and ready to nip you who doe not approve his opinion it is no marvaile that his rude followers doe lay all slaunders reproach and aspersions on us who oppose him and charge him with Socinian haeresie and blasphemy whom they admire and proclaime to bee the great light of GODS Church in these last dayes Socinianisme Foure things there are especially which much commend an Interpretation when they are found in conjunction and establish it like that King upon his Throne Prov. 36.31 against whom there is no rising up First if the Letter or Grammar of the Scripture will fairely and strongly beare it 2º If the scope of the place will close directly and intirely with it 3º When the interpretation which is set up against it cannot stand before the circumstances of the text 4º And lastly when the judgement of able learned and unpartiall men are found in concurrence with it If these foure be sufficient to furnish out an interpretation with authority and power then shall wee need no more Scriptures to prove the innocency of our affirmative viz. the imputation of faith for righteousnes the truth of the negative inseparably accompanying it but that one Chapter onely Rom. 4. Christianisme IN these wordes hee makes his enterance into the disputing of the point before propounded to wit faith in a proper sense is imputed for righteousnes in justification which speech excludes the righteousnes of Christ from being the onely righteousnes by which being communicated and imputed to true beleevers they are justified and stand righteous before GOD. First he propounds foure things which when they are found in coniunction with an interpretation of any Scripture they commend and establish it as he saith like that King upon his Throne against whom there is no rising up Prov. 30.31 These foure things First the literal sense strongly bearing it Secondly the scope of the place concurring Thirdly the inconsistence of the circumstances of the place with the interpretation which is contrary Fourthly the Judgement of able learned men agreeing with it these I say may passe for current But whether that one place of Scripture in the interpretation whereof these concurre bee alone without more Scriptures sufficient to prove the innocency of an assertion which is agreeable to that interpretation is a question many interpretations seeme to have all these and yet are contradicted by other Scriptures as that place Hosea 11.1 When Israel was a child out of Egypt have I called my Sonne being interpreted of the Nation of the Israelites was borne up by the letter concurred with the scope and circumstances more then many contrary expositors and all the learned and able Jewes so understood it and yet the Gospell expounds it another way Mat. 2.15 The place of Scripture upon the interpretation whereof established by these foure things hee intends to build his whole dispute in this Chapter is the fourth Chapter of the Epistle to the Romans so that his proofes by which hee goeth about to set the royall Crowne which is due to Christ and his righteousnes on the head of mans imperfect faith are according to these foure things divided into foure rankes First he undertakes to prove that the Letter of that Scripture Rom. 4. doth beare up his interpretation to wit that faith in it selfe and in a proper sense is said to bee imputed for righteousnes in justification Secondly by the scope of the place Thirdly by shewing that the circumstances of that Scripture cannot beare the Doctrine of Christs righteousnes imputed Fourthly by the judgement and testimonies of able learned and unpartiall men But how poorely he performes his undertakings and how pitifully hee faileth in them wee shall in the progresse shew That his disputation is like to be very Illogicall we may gather from the foule flaw which appeares in his Logicke in this his first enterance where hee saith wee need no more Scriptures to prove the innocency of our affirmative viz. the imputation of faith for righteousnes the truth of the negative inseparably accompanying it but that Chapter onely Rom. 4. First it is against all true reason and Logicke that the affirmative should be innocent from untruth and that the negative which is opposed to it should have truth accompanying it If his affirmative faith is imputed for righteousnesse in a proper sense be true then the negative must needs be false to wit faith in a proper sense is not imputed But perhaps by the negative he doth not meane the negative of his affirmative but some other negative proposition the subject whereof is different from the subject of his affirmative His hatred and envy against Christs righteousnesse least it should get the Crowne from faith is so great that wee may well conceive that by the negative hee in heart meanes this Christs righteousnes is not imputed in justification which if hee doth wee cannot but blame him for speaking ambiguously which Logick in a disputation abhorreth But I leave his trifling and come to the ground and foundation of his discourse even that fourth Chapter of the Epistle to the Romans on which he labours to build his hereticall opinion The words of that Chapter which seeme most to favour him are these Verse 3. Abraham beleeved GOD and it was counted to him for righteousnes and verse 5. To him that beleeveth his faith is counted for righteousnes and verse 9. For we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousnes That the truth may more plainly appeare and the contrary falshoode and errour be made more fully manifest I will first lay down the true orthodoxe exposition of the words which is according to the common judgement of the most godly learned and judicious Divines of the best reformed Churches Secondly I will truely rehearse the corrupt exposition of the Apostles wordes made by the hereticke Socinus and his followers the Arminians and other fanaticall Sectaries unto which this adversary adheres and grounds his whole disputation upon it The orthodox exposition I will illustrate and confirme by the scope and circumstances of the rext and by arguments drawne from other Scriptures The corrupt exposition also I will prove to be false and hereticall And afterwards I will proceed to answer this adversaries discourse in every particular The true Exposition explained FIrst these wordes that Abraham beleeved GOD and it was counted to him for righteousnes are generally held to be improper and tropicall and that the meaning of them is not that Abrahams faith or act of beleeving by it selfe in a proper sense was counted to him for righteousnes but that the object of his faith even that
the Scripture where any thing besides faith and believing is said to be counted to man for righteousnes is that place of the Psalmist Psal. 106. and 31. where the godly zealous act of Phinees in executing just judgement on Zamri and Cosbi is said to be counted to him for righteousnes Now the meaning of the wordes there cannot be that this act of Phinees was accepted of GOD and counted to him for righteousnes to justification For then it will follow that a man may bee justified before GOD by one act or worke of his owne Which the Apostle here utterly condemneth as a grosse errour and bends his whole discourse against it The true sense and meaning of the phrase is no more but this that Phinees performing such an act of godly zeale as is proper onely to a faithfull righteous man who by the spirit of regeneration dwelling in him is so united unto Christ that by faith he was a true partaker of his righteousnes GOD upon this act gave him the testimony of righteousnes and declared and judged him to bee a righteous man truly justified Therefore the Apostles phrase of counting faith to the beleever for righteousnes which he often useth in this Chapter signifieth after the same manner GODS counting a true beleever for a righteous man and giving him the testimony of righteousnes because he is righteous indeed by communion of Christs righteousnesse which hee hath apprehended applied and enjoyeth by faith The confutation of the false hereticall exposition of the Apostles wordes maintained by the Socinian faction FIrst whereas they hold that faith considered by it selfe in a proper literall sense without consideration of the object or laying hold on Christ and his righteousnes is counted to the beleever for righteousnes to justification and GOD requires in and of us no other thing for righteousnes neither our owne workes performed in our owne persons according to the Law nor Christs perfect righteousnes and fulfilling of the Law made ours by spirituall union and communion with Christ and accepted of GOD for us This I prove to bee false hereticall and blasphemous by these arguments following First faith taken in a proper sense is a part of our conformity and argument 1 obedience to the Law of GOD which above all things requires that wee give honour to GOD by beleeving him and his word and by trusting in him as our onely rock the GOD of our strength and salvation They therefore teaching that faith in a proper sense is counted for righteousnes doe teach that wee are iustified by a worke of obedience to the Law performed in our owne persons and GOD requires on our behalfe no other righteousnes for justification which Doctrine the Apostle utterly condemnes Therefore their opinion and exposition is hereticall and more impious then the Pelagian and Popish heresies concerning iustification Secondly that which was properly argument 2 imputed to Abraham and is so imputed to true beleevers is righteousnes so the Apostle in plaine wordes expresseth verse 6. and 11. but faith in a proper sense is not righteousnes For righteousnes is perfect conformity to the Law as sinne is transgression of the Law yea humane righteousnes is a mans keeping of the whole Law and his observing to doe all GODS commandements with his whole heart all the dayes of his life as wee read Deuteronomie 8. Thirdly that which chargeth argument 3 GOD with errour and falshood in his iudgement is blasphemous This opinion that GOD counts faith for righteousnes that is thinketh iudgeth and esteemeth it to bee righteousnes in a proper sense chargeth GOD with errour and falshood in his iudgement For faith is not any true righteousnes properly Therefore this opinion is blasphemy If they plead that GOD by his absolute soveraignty of power may accept and repute that for righteousnes which is not true righteousnes This doth but more entangle them and involve them in errour For GOD and his soveraigne power are all one as GOD cannot lye nor make contradictories true so his sovereignty of power cannot either make that to bee righteousnes which is not or truely iudge it so to bee Neither can his infinite iustice bee satisfied without perfect fulfilling of his Law nor allow any man to bee iustified without righteousnes nor will his truth suffer him to count any iust who is not iust Therefore by this base shift and wicked pretence devised to hide and cover their blasphemy they do runne further into blasphemy and make his soveraigne power a tyrant and oppressour of his iustice and truth argument 4 Fourthly that opinion which taketh away and denyeth the meanes by which GOD is revealed to be infinitely iust mercifull and wise and makes the satisfaction of Christ and his perfect fulfilling the Law a vaine and needlesse thing is most hereticall impious and blasphemous This opinion that GOD by his sovereigne power can and doth accept and count imperfect faith for perfect righteousnes takes away the meanes by which GODS iustice mercy and wisdome are revealed to be infinit yea it extenuates and vilifies GODS iustice mercy bounty and wisdom and makes Christs full satisfaction a vaine superfluous and needlesse thing Therefore it is an impious and blasphemous opinion First that which reveales GOD to be infinitly iust is that he cannot be reconciled to men that have sinned without execution of iustice to the full and a full satisfaction made according to his iust Law if not by men in their owne persons which is impossible yet by their mediator and surety in their behalfe and by him communicated to them and made theirs as truly as if they had fulfilled the Law in their owne persons And though this satisfaction be of infinit value yet it cannot profit them nor actually merit for them till they be partakers of it truely and really by spirituall communion This is that meanes by which GOD is known to be infinitly iust Secondly when GODS infinite iustice was so strict that nothing could satisfie it nor redeeme mankind but a satisfaction of infinite value made for them And when all the world was not able to find such a satisfaction that his wisedome should finde one out and have it ready before hand in her eternall treasures even a full satisfaction performed in mans nature by GOD the eternall son and also the meanes to make it truely and really the satisfaction of every man truely beleeving that is by the Holy Ghost shed on them through the Sonne Christ and making them one spirituall body with him This reveales GOD to be infinite in wisedome Thirdly in that GOD the Father would in this case give his onely begotten sonne to be humbled in our nature and to obey suffer and make such a satisfaction for poore miserable men in that the sonne would willingly take all this upon him to doe and suffer whatsoever iustice could require and in that the holy Ghost when this satisfaction could not otherwise profit men nor bee made theirs doth not
disdaine to take up for his constant dwelling the earthly tabernacles of mens bodies and to worke in them all graces needfull to conforme them to Christ and to make them sensibly to enjoy him with all his benefits This most wonderfully shewes GODS infinite mercy bounty and free goodnesse And all these meanes which are manifested and maintained by our Doctrine of justification this wicked opinion of the Socinians doth utterly take away First it denies GODS justice to require mans communion of such an infinite satisfaction made by Christ for him it treads GODS justice under foote by his soveraignty of power and maugre justice it makes mans imperfect faith to go current for righteousnes and to be accepted for perfect righteouses to justification Secondly if GOD by soveraignty of power can beare downe justice and make any weak and imperfect thing such as mans faith is serve in stead of Christs full satisfaction and perfect righteousnes Then hee might by the same power have appointed the sacrifice of a Lamb or any cleane beast or the satisfaction of any mere man and so it will follow that the giving of his son to bee made man was no point of wisedome but a going farre about and spending much even Christs blood when lesse might have served the turne As for GODS goodnesse mercy and bounty they are hereby made painted shewes and shadowes yea needlesse prodigality and Christs satisfaction is made vaine and superfluous Therfore this opinion which brings in such impious consequences is blasphemous and hereticall Fiftly that opinion which overthrowes the sacraments of the Gospel and takes away the true use of them is heriticall prophane and impious This opinion that Christs righteousnesse is not imputed to the faithfull doth so For the sacraments are seales of our union and communion with Christ Baptisme seales our engraffing into Christ in our new birth by which we become one with him The LORDS Supper is such a lively seale of our communion with Christ in the benefits of his death passion and full satisfaction expressed under the termes of eating his flesh and drinking his blood that it is commonly called the communion of the faithfull when it is rightly received But these Hereticks while by imputing faith in a proper sense they exclude the imputation of Christs righteousnes to the faithfull they deny their communion and union with Christ they take away the truth and the use of the Sacraments for if the faithfull are regenerate and by one spirit ingraffed into Christ and united unto him as Baptisme signifieth and sealeth and if they have spiritual communion with Christ of his righteousnes and all other benefits which the LORDS Supper signifieth and is thereof a seale to them Then GOD whose judgment is according to truth cannot but impute Christs righteousnes to them and accept it for them and account it theirs They who deny GODS imputing of it do either charge GOD with injustice and error of judgment in not counting and iudging that to be theirs in which they have communion and interest or else they deny the union and communion of the faithfull with Christ and make the sacraments lying signes and seales of false things and things which are not Therefore their opinion is most abominable profane impious and blasphemous argument 6 Sixtly that opinion which is invented and maintained by Heretiks who deny the eternall Godhead of Christ and tends mainely to perswade that there is no use of Christs being GOD and man in one person is Hereticall and blasphemous Such is this opinion of the Socinians it is an invention of Haretiks and tends to take away the use of Christs being GOD and to perswade men that there is no necessary use of his being GOD and man in one person For all Orthodox Divines give this reasō why it was necessary that Christ the mediator should be GOD in our nature even that the obedience suffering which he did under goe in mans nature might be the obedience and suffering of GOD and so of infinite value and though of him alone and but for a time yet of more worth then if all men in their owne persons had obeyed as much as hee did and suffered for ever in Hell They teach also that first for the removing of so great evils as the infinite wrath of GOD eternall death and torment in Hell and secondly for purchase of so great a good as is the state of righteousnesse and of grace and also of eternall glory in Heaven GODS justice could require no lesse satisfaction and righteousnes nor be satisfied with any other but that which is performed by him who is GOD and man in one person that is the perfect righteousnes and satisfaction of Christ which alone by the infinite value which it receives from his God-head is fit to remove so infinite an evil and to procure so infinite a good to men But the maintainers of this Socinian opinion by denying that GODS infinite justice stands in strength to exact such a satisfaction being over-ruled and oppressed by absolute soveraignty of power and by teaching that mercy and bounty run beyond reason freeing men from all need of such an infinite satisfaction to be communicated imputed to them and justifying them freely without righteousnes they do take away the use of Christs God-head in his mediation and the causes and reasons for which it was necessary that he should be GOD as well as man And in conclusion in places where they dare be bold to disclose the secret thoughts of their hearts they roundly deny Christ to be the Sonne of GOD of the same substance with GOD the Father Therefore this their opinion is most impious blasphemous and Hereticall And indeed it is never found in Histories to have been maintained by any but Samosatenian Heretiks deadly enemies to Christs deity Lastly that opinion which is builded upon an Hereticall and blasphemous ground and is upheld and maintained by blasphemous arguments which do shake and even raze the maine foundations of true Religion must needs be most wicked and blasphemous and such is this opinion for it is builded upon this blasphemous ground that GOD by his soveraigne power may do and will things contrary to his justice that is count and accept that for righteousnes which is no righteousnes nor worthy to be accounted an act of perfect righteousnes for such is the faith of fraile man taken in a proper sense The arguments by which it is commonly maintained are also blasphemous and wicked to wit First they argue that Christs righteousnes is not imputed to true believers neither can be made or counted theirs by GOD. Because Christs righteousnes is the righteousnes of another far different from them and GOD cannot iustify one by anothers righteousnes and therefore we are not iustified by Christs righteousnesse neither is it imputed in iustification Now what is this but a denying of the union of the faithfull with Christ for if he be one with us and we one
with him then are our sinnes made his by communion and in him satisfied and his righteousnes and satisfaction is made ours and we thereby are pardoned and iustified by it as it is made ours and is not the righteousnes of a stranger nor of one who is another so different from us but that he and we are one spirituall body and all his benefits are ours and we have an interest in them and possesse them and enioy them so far as every one hath need of them As this argument tends to overthrow our union with Christ so A. Wotton in a manuscript of essayes doth professe that our union with Christ is onely metaphoricall Secondly they argue that the righteousnes of Christ cannot be sufficient for the elect nor counted to them for all righteousnesse which is in effect a denying of Christ to be GOD and man in one person for if they acknowledg him to be GOD they must needs hold that his righteousnes and fulfilling of the Law is of more worth and value then if all men in the world had fulfilled the Law in their owne persons without failing in one point Thirdly they argue that if Christ his righteousnes and satisfaction be so made ours and imputed to us that the Law may be said to be fulfilled in us we may said to have satisfied GODS iustice in him our head and by him our surety then is there no place left for pardon and free forgivenesse of our sinnes for pardon and satisfaction are contrary By which they overthrow the Doctrine of redemption and of Christs satisfaction for us and deny Christ to be our redeemer and to have paid our ransome and made a full satisfaction to the justice of GOD for our sinnes contrary to the Scriptures and the judgement and beliefe of all Christian Divines who teach that Christ hath paid our ransome is our 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and properly called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 our redeemer And though GODS justice exacted of Christ our surety a full ransome and did not abate him the least farthing of our debt yet we are freely pardoned and have free forgivenesse and are freely iustified by GODS grace because hee did freely give his owne son to satisfy fulfill the Law for us doth freely by his grace and the free gift of his spirit unite us to Christ and make us partakers of his satisfaction imputing his satisfaction freely to us doth for it freely forgive our sinnes and justifie us Fourthly while they argue that faith in a proper sense is all the righteousnes which the faithfull have for justification and yet faith is not any formall righteousnes by their owne confession yea they deny that any formall righteousnes is required in justification hereby they deny the Saints justified to be righteous contrary to the Scriptures which call them the righteous and the generation of the righteous Psal. 1.6 and 14.5 and the righteous nation Isa. 26.2 and in many other places which title GODS spirit would never give to them if they were not formally righteous by righteousnes communicated to them after a spirituall heavenly manner For to hold as they doe that men are justified and counted righteous without any formall righteousnes which doth constitute and give being to a righteous and justified man as he is righteous and justified is a monstrous opinion contrary to reason Fiftly while they deny that the faithfull are constituted and made formally righteous by the obedience of Christ communicated and imputed to them which the Apostle in expresse wordes doth affirme Rom. 5.19 and 8.4 and Rom. 10.4 they in heate of argument fall into the Pelagian heresie and are forced to deny that Adams sinne and disobedience is communicated and imputed to his posterity so as that they are formally sinners by it And rather then they will yeeld that infants which dye before they commit actuall transgression in their owne persons are punished with death because they are guilty of Adams sinne they doe blasphemously affirme that GOD being offended and moved to wrath by the sinnes of parents will out of the magnificence of his judgement and rage of his iustice destroy innocent babes with their sinfull parents for terrour to others which is contrary to GODS word and Law which teach that children shal not dye for the sinnes of their parents unlesse they bee partakers with them either by communion and imputation or by imitation and approbation Whereas they bring for instance that the children of Korah were destroyed with their father though they were innocent and not partakers in the sinne herein they contradict the Scriptures which expressely affirme that the children of Korah dyed not numb 26.11 For they undoubtedly upon Moses his threatning of sudden destruction fled from their fathers tents and escaped and onely they perished who would not be admonished by Moses to separate themselves from the congregation of Korah but adhering to him were partakers of his conspiracy and sinne of rebellion Sixtly when they to colour their heresie proclayme Christs righteousnes to bee the meritorious cause of iustification and yet deny communion and imputation of it to true beleevers what is this but to hold that Christs righteousnes is meritorious to them who have no interest in it which being granted it will follow That Christs righteousnes doth merit for infidels and damned reprobates and doth as much for the justifying of them as it doth to justifie the Elect and faithfull For true reason can conceive no cause why Christ doth merit more or conferre more to the justification of the elect and faithfull by his righteousnesse then hee doth to Infidels and reprobates but onely this that he communicates it to the elect gives them a proper interest in it and makes them truely partakers of it so that it is imputed to them and made their meritorious ransome this while these men deny they deny Christs righteousnes to merit any more for the faithfull then for damned reprobates And thus their bent is to set up Pelagian and Arminian free will and to make this the onely difference betweene them that are justified and them that are damned that whereas both alike have equall share in Christs merits and Christ hath merited as much for the one as the other and given as much grace for iustification the one having power of free will doth use it and will beleeve and so is iustified by his faith imputed for righteousnes the other will not use the universall grace given to him nor beleeve which he might doe if he would and therefore is damned which is a most horrible and abominable Doctrine and hereticall opinion Lastly they argue that as in the first Covenant GOD required workes of the Law performed by every man in his owne person and this was the condition which man was to performe for iustification and eternall life and so that Covenant was not free but conditionall So in the new Covenant GOD requires faith
and beleeving which wee on our part must performe for iustification life and salvation And hereby they abolish the freedome of the new Covenant and make it a Covenant conditionall and not of free grace For what soever is covenanted-and promised upon a condition to be performed is not absolutely free nor freely given and so according to their Doctrine they that are iustified by faith are not freely iustified by grace whereas they plead Scripture for their errour and alledge that iustification and life is promised upon condition of beleeving If you beleeve you shall be saved I answer that this is a grosse and absurd mistake For every conditionall proposition doth not propound the conditition of a Covenant which the party to whom a thing is promised must performe that the promise may bee made good to him for such a condition whensoever it is performed makes the thing covenanted a due debt which the promiser is bound to give But oftentimes a conditionall proposition propounds the meanes by which a free gift is received or the qualification by which one is made capable and fit to receive and enjoy a free gift as for example it is often said in Scripture if yee will heare and hearken yee shall eate the good of the land and shall live and not be destroyed Isay 1.19 Ier. 26.3 and many other places If we love one another GOD dwelleth in us 1 Iohn 4. If we walke in the light we have fellowship one with another 1 Iohn 1.2 If we confesse our sinnes hee is faithfull and just to forgive 1 Iohnâ— 9 If a man be just and do that which is right he shall surely live Ezech 18.5.21 In all which and the like places there is no condition of the Covenant propounded but onely the way and meanes to receive blessing or the quality condition by which men are made capable and fit to enjoy the blessing and somtimes the signes tokens and effects of them that are in a blessed estate And even so when GODS word saith If you believe yee shall be saved There is no condition of the Covenant propounded to be performed on our part for justification and salvation but onely the qualification by which GOD of his free grace doth qualify and fit us to be iustified and saved and the meanes by which hee enables us to receive righteousnes and to lay hold on salvation which is freely given to us in Christ. Vpon these particulars severally observed out of their owne words and writings I strongly conclude that this opinion being builded upon such a blasphemous and Hereticall ground and upheld and maintained by such blasphemous arguments must needs be most impious Hereticall and blasphemous Having already proved the Socinian and Arminian opinion to be most false and abominable I proceed to answere the particular arguments contained in this 2. Chapter which was by the Authors owne hand delivered unto me to be answered And because he and his followers shall not complaine of misrelating any of his words I will as I have done in the former Chapter first lay downe his owne words Socinianisme THe first argument brought to prove that faith and believing are in a proper sense Rom. 4. said to be imputed to the believer for righteousnes in justification and not the righteousnes of Christ. First the letter of this Scripture speakes what we affirme plainely and speakes no parable about it yea it speakes it once and twice yea it speakes it the third and fourth time and is not ashamed of it Abraham beleeved GOD and it was imputed to him for righteousnes verse 3. Againe to him that worketh not but believeth in him that justifieth the ungodly his Faith is counted to him for righteousnes verse 5. And yet againe verse 22. And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousnes The same phrase and expression is used also verse 23.24 Certainely there is not any truth in religion not any article of our beliefe that can boast of the letter of the Scripture more full expresse and pregnant for it what is maintained concerning the imputation of faith hath all the authority and countenance from the Scriptures that wordes can lightly give whereas the imputation of Christs righteousnes in that sense which many magnifie hath not the least reliefe either from any sound of wordes or sight of letter in the Scripture Christianisme HIs first argument reduced into the forme of a syllogisme runs thus That opinion which hath the Letter of the Scripture more full expresse and pregnant for it then any truth in religion or article of our beliefe and hath all the authority and countenance from the Scripture that wordes can lightly give is certainely true This opinion concerning the imputation of faith in a proper sense is such Therefore it is a true and sound opinion That this imputation of faith may boast of the letter of Scripture and of all the authority and countenance that wordes can give hee proves because the letter of the Scripture speakes it once twice yea thrice and foure times to wit in this Chapter Rom. verse 3.5 22 23 24. to which I will adde a fift time verse 9. The more true that the proposition is the more false is the assumption wherein hee assumes most falsely to his opinion that which in no wise belongs to it and thereupon inferres a most false conclusion I answere therefore that his assumption is an heap of impudent lyes First the killing letter of the Scripture may give some countenance to it that is speeches of Scripture understood and urged literally which are spoken by GODS spirit tropically and in a figure This Saint Austin calls the killing letter because they who take the words properly and so urge them obstinately they slay their owne soules But the true literall sense of the wordes which are improperly literall will never give any countenance to this hereticall opinion as I have shewed before most fully 2 I cannot but accuse him here of most intollerable impudency in that he affirmes that this most Hereticall opinion hath more full expresse and pregnant testimony from the letter of the Scripture then any truth in Religion or any article of Religion and hath all the authority and countenance from the Scripture that words can give when as in all the Scripture faith is not once said to be imputed for righteousnes in a proper sense in all the word of GOD and is onely seven times said to be counted or imputed for righteousnes and that tropically while the Apostle useth the phrase borrowed from that improper speech which is spoken of Abraham Gen. 15.6 That when Abraham believed GOD he counted it to him for righteousnes For it is manifest that in this Chapter he altogether insists upon that speech and doth but repeat it six times and so likewise Gal. 3.6 Saint Iames also once useth it speaking of declarative justification to prove that Abraham was justified by workes Iam. 2.23 that is declared before men to be
righteous because the Scripture saith Abraham believed GOD and it was imputed to him for righteousnes So that of Saint Iames may be believed faith is not the righteousnesse for which man is accepted with GOD as the Socinians teach but that by which man obteines the testimony of righteousnes as Iustine Martyr understands this phrase Now that Christ and his fulfilling of the law is truely and properly the righteousnes by which all believers are justified constituted and made righteous before GOD the Scriptures do in proper literall speech as well as improperly more often affirme as Isa. 61.10 Rom. 3.24 Rom. 4 6. Rom. 5.17 18 19· Rom. 8.4 and 10.3.4 and Phil. 3.9 and 1 Cor. 1.30 and 2 Cor. 5.24 these twelve places do plainely teach and affirme that the righteousnes by which men are made and constituted righteous in iustification is Christs obedience and satisfaction made to the Law for our redemption and nine of them are proper speeches so that here wee see the communion of Christs righteousnesse which hee opposeth hath more authority and countenance from the Scripture and more full expresse and pregnant testimony from the letter of it If I should instance in other truths of Religion as that there is one true GOD even Jehovah and none beside him or that hee created all things or concerning the deity of Christ and of the holy Ghost or concerning redemption by Christ or the last Iudgment resurrection and life eternall ten expresse and pregnant testimonies of Scripture might be brought to prove any one of them for every one wherein imputation of faith is named So that here we see what he cannot proue by argument he goeth about by impudent outfaceing to impose upon his hearers and readers But let us examine the proofe of this bold assertion even his assumption which certainely is as poore weake and begerly as his forehead is strong like brasse in impudent affirming it The letter of the Scripture saith hee affirmes it plainely once and twice yea a third and fourth time Therefore it is most certainely true To this I answere that the letter of the Scripture affirmes that faith and believing was counted to Abraham and is to other believers but not in a proper sense but tropically and so many things are often affirmed by the letter of the Scripture which if we understand them in a proper sense are most false as for example GOD is said to repent Gen 6. two severall times to wit ver 6.7 and Ier. 26. three severall times viz. ver 3 13.19 and Amos 7.3 6. and Iud 2.18 and 1 Sam. 15.11 Psal. 135.14 Ier. 18.10 with many more So likewise an hand and armes and eyes and mouth are often attributed by the letter of the Scripture to GOD which speeches if wee should understand in a proper sense they would prove a killing letter to us therefore this is a most absurd and ridiculous proofe well beseeming the thing which it is brought to prove And as he falters in his Logick and his reasons so he shewes ignorance of rhethorik for he takes it for a certaine truth that one phrase foure times used must needs be taken in a proper literall sense But rhetorik would have taught him that to use divers tropicall speeches together is an Allegory and elegancy of speech often used in Scripture as the places last cited shew To which let me add one most pregnant instance Gal. 3. where the word faith in a discourse of justification is used ten times in an improper sense for the Gospel which is the word of faith and teacheth iustification by Christ and by believing in him and not by our owne workes which the Law requires to wit verses 3 5 7 8 9 12 14 22 23 25. Now it may be he perceived little strength in his argument brought for his imputation of faith notwithstanding his great braggs and therefore he shootes one fooles bolt against the imputation of Christs righteousnes which is an argument or syllogisme consisting of an assumption without a proposition or a conclusion expressed but I can coniecture what he meant to conclude namely that the imputation of Christs righteousnes in iustification is a mere faction and ought not to be believed The imputation of Christs righteousnesse in that sense which many magnifie hath not the least reliefe either from sound of words or light of letter in the Scripture To which I answer first that if this were granted which is most false yet it doth not follow that faith alone in a proper sense is imputed Ridiculum caput saith he in the Comedie quasi necesse sit si justitia Christi non dicitur imputari fidem reputari pro justitia It is a ridiculous conceipt to thinke that if Christs righteousnes be not imputed therefore faith alone in a proper sense must be said to bee imputed David tells us that Phinees his executing of iudgement was imputed to him for righteousnes and Saint Iames saith that Abraham was iustified by works not by faith alone why then are not works as well as faith imputed But secondly I answer that his assertion is most false and I prove it from the very wordes of the Apostle in the 4. Chapter verse 6. where he saith that to the blessed man righteousnes is imputed without workes and verse 11. where he gathereth that to the beleeving Gentiles though uncircumcised righteousnes shal be imputed Now faith is not righteousnes as hee himselfe confesseth for righteousnes is perfect conformity to GODS law this is not to bee found in all the world but only in Christ he alone hath in mans nature fulfilled the law As for faith evē in Abrahā himselfe it was stained with many doubtings and feares at some times as when he called his wife his sister for better safety and so it is in the best beleevers Beleeving also is but a dutie and a worke of obedience to the Law but this which is here said to bee imputed is a righteousnes without workes or any thing performed in our owne persons therefore faith is not the righteousnes which is here said to be imputed but the righteousnes of Christ apprehended by faith and couched under the name of faith and beleeving Socinianisme SEcondly the scope of the place rejoyceth also in this interpretation that faith should be taken properly in all those passages cited and from tropes and metonymies it turneth it selfe away It is apparent to the circumspect Reader that the Apostles maine intent and drift in this whole discourse of justification was to hedge up with thornes as it were that false way of justification which lay through workes and to put men from attempting any going that way and to open and discover the true way of justification wherein men shall not faile to attain that Law of righteousnes before GOD that is in plaine speech to make knowne unto them what they must doe and what GOD requireth of them to their justification and what he will accept at their hands this
as it comprehends Christs righteousnesse is counted to him that hath it righteousnes and Christs righteousnesse which the beleever by faith possesseth is set on his skore for iustification A second notorious untruth is that such a figure of speech as this is not to be found in all the Apostles writings besides For the same expression and figure of speeches used by this Apostle Cap. 2.26 as I have before plainely shewed Yea foure times in the foure last verses is the same trope used uncircumcision first for a man uncircumcised and secondly for the state of an uncircumcised Gentile and circumcision for a circumcised Iew and againe for inward sanctification whereof circumcision was the signe and Sacrament and ten severall times doth he tropically by faith meane the Gospell and Doctrine thereof which is the obiect of faith Gal. 3 as I have before noted where he discourseth about this weighty point of iustification A third impudent lye and manifest falshood is that the Apostle time after time and in one place after another useth the word faith or beleeving imputed without ever explaining himselfe or changing his speech For that which he calls faith and beleeving and faith it is imputed for righteousnes vers 3. and 5. he explaining himselfe and changing his speech v. 6.11 calls it righteousnes and saith GOD imputeth righteousnes and righteousnesse is imputed In a word I doe challenge him to shew one place in all the writings of this Apostle wherein he useth this phrase of faith or beleeving imputed for righteousnes except onely here in this Chapter and in Gal 3. In both which places he cites that testimony of Moses concerning Abraham that GOD counted faith to him for righteousnes and urgeth it in the phrase of Moses but in all other places where he writes of iustification he useth his owne expressions and saith that wee are iustified by Christs satisfaction made for our redemption as Rom. 3.24 and by his obedience and fulfilling of the Law Rom. 5.19 and 8.4 and 10.3.4 and that Christ is made to us righteousnesse 1 Cor. 1.30 and we are made the righteousnes of GOD in him 2 Cor. 5.21 If he cannot shew any place besides these then let him bee ashamed of his doings in that he hath bent his tongue and pen like a bow for lyes and shootes out in every passage so many notorious untruthes that hee may bee suspected to have full furnished his quiver from the armorie of the father of lyes the Prince of darknesse The second Argument SEcondly verse 5. it is said that to him that beleeveth his faith is imputed to him for righteousnes From which clause it is evident that that faith whatsoever we understand by it which is imputed is his somewhat that wayes truely and properly called his before such imputation of it bee made unto him Now it cannot be said of the righteousnesse of Christ that it is any mans before the imputation of it to him but faith properly taken is the beleevers before it be imputed at least in order of nature though not in time Therefore by faith which is here said to be imputed cannot be meant the righteousnesse of Christ. Answer THe righteousnes of Christ by spirituall union and communion which every true beleever hath with Christ is as truely his as his faith For Christ is made unto him righteousnesse 1 Cor. 1.30 and he is made the righteousnesse of GOD in Christ 2 Cor. 5.22 and that in order of nature before it is counted his righteousnesse For GOD whose judgement is according to truth doth not count that to the beleever which he hath not before communicated or at the same time doth communicate to him Secondly I answer that if faith which is here called his faith be faith in a proper sense and be imputed for righteousnesse to justification then is man justified by his owne inherent righteousnesse and by a worke done and performed in his owne person which every Orthodox Divine will tell him is flat popery or worse The third Argument THirdly granting a trope or Metonymie in this place and that by faith is meant the object of it or the thing beleeved yet it will not follow from hence that the righteousnesse of Christ should be said to bee imputed here but either GOD himselfe or the promise of GOD made to Abraham For it is said verse 3. that Abraham beleeved GOD not that he beleeved Christs righteousnes except we set up another trope to maintaine the former and by GOD will say is meant the righteousnes of Christ which would bee not a trope or figure but rather a monster of speech Therefore the righteousnesse of Christ is not here said to be imputed for righteousnesse but faith properly taken Yea whereas the object of faith as justifying is expressed with great variety of words and termes in Scripture in all this variety there is not once to bee found the least mention of the righteousnes of Christ as if the holy Ghost foreseeing the kindling of this false fire had purposely withdrawne or withheld all fuell that might feed it Sometimes Christ in person is made the obiect of this faith Iohn 3.16 besides many such expressions Sometimes Christ in his Doctrine or the Doctrine and word of Christ Iohn 5.46 had yee beleeved Moses yee would have beleeved mee Sometimes Christ in the relation of his person and that either as he stands related unto GOD as his father Iohn 20.31 or else as hee stands related to those ancient promises of GOD made unto the Iewes concerning a Messiah to be given and sent unto them Iohn 8.24 except yee beleeve that I am hee yee shall dye in your sinnes Sometimes the raising up of Christ from the dead as Rom. 10.9 Sometimes GOD himselfe is made the obiect of faith 1. Pet. 1.21 Sometimes the record or testimony of GOD concerning his sonne is made the obiect of faith 1. Ioh. 5.10 In all this variety or diversity of expressing the obiect of faith as iustifying there is no sound or intimation of the righteousnes or active obedience of Christ. Not but that the righteousnesse of Christ is and ought to bee beleeved as well as other things revealed and affirmed in the Scriptures yea it is of nearer concernment to the maine to beleeve it then the beleeving of many things besides comprehended in the Scriptures as well as it but the reason I conceive why it is not numbred or reckoned up among the obiects of faith as iustifying is because though it ought and cannot but be beleeved by that faith which iustifyeth yet it may be beleeved also by such a faith which is so farre from iustifying that it denyeth this Christ whose righteousnesse notwithstanding it beleeveth to be the sonne of GOD. Thus some of his owne nation the Iewes have given testimony to his righteousnesse and innocency who yet received him not for their Messiah nor beleeved him to be GOD. And this is the frame constitution of the Turkish faith for the
one Anselme on Rom 5. saith that by the righteousnes of one comming upon all the elect they come unto justification that they may bee justified by participation of Christs righteousnesse These with many other testimonies which might easily bee gathered out of the Ancients from the primitive times untill Luther doe abundantly shew the impudency of this man who so peremptorily affirmeth that the communion and imputation of Christs righteousnesse for iustification was never dreamed of among ancient writers but onely faith imputed for righteousnesse in a proper sense all these Ancients before named testifie the contrary But to descend to Orthodox writers of this last age since Luther It is well knowne that they generally hold imputation of our sinnes to Christ and of Christs satisfaction and righteousnesse to us for iustification to bee the forme of iustification by which beleevers are iustified Luther acknowledged that it was the doctrine of Saint Bernard concerning iustification by Christs righteousnesse imputed and not by our owne workes which moved him to suspect the popish doctrine and to grow into dislike and loathing of their religion And in his commentary on Galat where he doth debase the righteousnesse of workes and doth most highly extoll the righteousnesse of faith he telleth us that faith being weak in many of GODS children cannot be accepted for righteousnesse of it selfe that is in a proper sense and therefore there is necessarily required imputation of righteousnesse for iustification on Galatians 3.6 In editione Jenensi Tom. 1. pag. 32. hee saith faith obtaines what the Law commands and what is that but obedience and righteousnesse and againe by faith Christ is in us yea one bodie with us but Christ is righteous and a fulfiller of the Law wherefore wee all doe fulfill it while Christ is made ours by faith Also Tom. 3. p. 539. when Paul ascribes iustification to faith wee must of necessity understand that hee speakes of faith laying hold on Christ which makes Christ of efficacy against sinne and the Law Also Tom. 2. pag. 515. Faith settles us upon the workes of Christ without our owne workes and translates us out of the exile of our sinnes into the kingdome of his righteousnesse And Tom. 1. pag. 410. Sinne is not destroyed unlesse the Law be fulfilled but the Law is not fulfilled but by the righteousnes of faith and page 437. To keepe the Law is to have and possesse Christ the fulfiller of the Law And Tom. 4. pag. 44. Faith iustifieth because it comprehendeth and possesseth that treasure to wit Christ and page 45. wee say that Christ doth forme faith or is the forme of faith And Tom. 2. upon Genesis The laying hold on the promises is called sure and firme faith and doth justifie not as it is our work These speeches shew plainely that Luther conceived Christs righteousnes to be after a sort the formall righteousnes of the believer though not formally inherent yet formally possessed and enjoyed by faith Concerning this justifying righteousnes Luther also teacheth that it is not in our selves but in Christ even his fulfilling of the Law for us made ours and imputed to us Tom. 1. pag 106. By faith saith hee are our sinnes made no more ours but Christs upon whom GOD hath laid the iniquities of us all and he hath borne our sinnes And on the other side all his righteousnes is made ours for he layes his hand upon us And pag 178. The righteousnes of a Christian is the righteousnes of another and comes to him from without It is even Christ who is made unto us of God righteousnes so that a man may with confidence glory in Christ and say Christ his living doing and suffering is mine no otherwise then if I had lived done and suffered as he did as the married man possesseth all that is his wives and the wife all the goods which are her husbands for they have all things common because they are become one flesh and so Christ and the Church are one spirit by faith Christs righteousnes is made ours and all his are ours yea himselfe is ours And Tom. 2. pag 86. The righteousnes by which we are justified before GOD is not in our owne persons but without our selves in GOD because man shall have no cause to boast of his owne proper righteousnes before GOD. And Tom. 2. pag 385. A Christian is not formally righteous by reason of any substance or quality in him but relatively in relation to Christ in whom hee hath true righteousnes Melancthon in Epist. ad Rom. 8.4 saith wherefore Pauls meaning is thus to be taken that Christ is given for us that we may be counted to have satisfyed the Law by him and that for him we may be reputed righteous Although we our selves do not satisfie the Law anothers fulfilling of it is freely given to us and is imputed to us and so the Law is imputatively fulfilled in us And so when the Apostle saith that Christ is the end of the Law for righteousnes that is hee who hath Christ is righteous hee is reputed to have satisfied the Law and hee imputatively hath that which the Law requires And on chap. 10.4 upon these wordes Christ is the end of the Law for righteousnes c hee saith this is the simple meaning Christ is the fulfilling of the Law to the believer and hee who hath Christ that is believes in him is righteous and hath imputatively what the Law requires The Booke of concord subscribed by so many hundreds of Evangelicall Ministers of the reformed Churches in Germany in the Articles of justification saith that when we speak of justifying it is to be knowne that these three objects concurre which are to be believed 1. The promise of the benefit that is mercy for remission of sinnes and justification 2. That the promise is most free which excludes our merits 3. The merits of Christ which are the price and propitiation and a little after faith doth not justify because it is a worke worthy by it selfe that is in a proper sense but onely because it receives the mercy promised And againe How shall Christ be our mediator if in justification we do not use him for our mediator that is if we do not feele that for him we are reputed righteous The Divines of the Augustane confession condemned Osiander who held that the righteousnes of faith was the essentiall righteousnes of GOD and also them who taught that Christ is our righteousnes onely according to his humane nature And in the Epitome of the Articles controverted by some they with one consent affirmed that the righteousnesse of faith is remission of sinnes reconciliation and adoption to be Sons of God for the obedience of Christ onely which by faith alone of meere grace is imputed to all beleevers Artic 3. de fidei justitia And this obedience of Christ which is imputed for righteousnes they affirme to be the obedience which hee performed both in his death and passion and also in his
City to whom as yet I was unknown that I was a green headed novice carryed away with anger and passion rather then zeal yet divers of you my learned Brethren did judge otherwise of me and my labours and God blessed them and made them and your assistance of me therein powerfull and effectuall to the quelling of those errors and to the suppressing of them at that time by putting the Author of them to silence And now for 20. yeares and more they have been buryed in oblivion untill this new Adversary hath raked them up as coales out of ashes and out of a surreptitious Booke which the First Adversary had composed Printed beyond the Seas and procured to be brought in by stealth and sold underhand did bring them into the pulpit and from thence with a tumultuous noyse proclaymed them most confidently Now because I have sufficiently acted my part heretofore in opposing these errors and also divers of you have entered into the lists and with zeale and courage have begun to fight against the reviver of them I should have refrayned my selfe from further medling but because this common adversary hath singled me out and provoked me by a proud challenge to answere his writings I have once more undertaken to answer his challenge which Answer being sent to him privately might there have restâ—d if his most reproachfull and rayling reply full of lyes absurdities contradictions blasphemies and intollerable scoffes and reproaches had not forced me to send it abroad into the world to justifie it selfe from the rayling and slanderous clamours which he and his disciples and factious followers have raised against it I here commend it to your grave censure in hope that the goodnesse of the cause which herein I maintaine will cover mine infirmities and will stirre you up to perfect and finish what I have begun The Truth for which you shall fight is strong and will prevaile all power might glory and victory is Gods for whose cause you stand and our Lord Jesus Christ on whose perfect rigteousnesse you strive to keep the Crown hath all power given him in heaven and in earth To this God eternall and omnipotent and to his eternall Sonne our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and to the most holy and blessed Spirit three persons in one God I commend you and your holy and faithfull labours in my dayly Prayers humbly supplicating to his Majesty for this Grace that I may continue till death Your fellow Soldier and labourer in his Vineyard GEORGE WALKER THE ANSWERERS PREFACE To the first Chapter THE question which is propounded and the state and drift thereof laid down in this first Chapter is in the Authors own words this whether the faith of him that truely beleeves or the righteousnesse of CHRIST be imputed for righteousnesse in the act of justification In this question the imputing of Faith is opposed to the imputing of Christs righteousnesse for righteousnesse to justification which no Orthodox Christian durst attenâ—â— to doe at any time for the godly learned in the Scriptures and acquainted with the writings of Orthodox divines both ancient and Moderne from the time of the Apostles to this day doe alwayes joyne Faith with Christs righteousnesse in the act of justification and do never account them such opposites as doe the one exclude the other and cannot both stand together and be reputed for righteousnesse to beleevers in justification Though the Apostle doth oppose justification by faith to justification by works of the Law performed by every man in his owne person as two opposites which cannot stand together in GODS justification of sinners And this all true Christians receive imbrace and hold for a solid truth and a fundamentall article of Christian Religion Yet they abhorre and detest the opposing of Faith and Christs righteousnes in GODS imputing of righteousnes to beleevers and doe with an unanimous consent teach that in this justifying act of GOD Christs righteousnesse of which all true beleevers have communion is that which GOD in a proper sense is said to accept and repute for righteousnesse and Faith as it receives and applies Christs righteousnesse is said to be imputed but in an improper speech the name of the act being used to signifie the object which we see frequently in Scripture as for example Gal. 3.2.25 where the name Faith is used to signifie the thing beleeved that is the doctrine of the Gospell and Coloss. 1.5 where the name Hope is used to signifie the thing hoped for that is the inheritance and reward laid up for us in Heaven of which kind many more instances may be produced But as for them who have called into controversie the imputation of Christs righteousnesse and having propounded this question whether Faith or the righteousnes of Christ is imputed in the act of justification have set up Faith and thrust out Christs righteousnesse they have ever beene branded by all true Churches of Christ for pestilent Heretikes and enemies of GODS saving truth The first mover of this question was one Petrus Abilardus a pestilent and blasphemous Heretick who being full of the spirit of pride and error did in disputing and writing deny the communion of Christs perfect satisfaction obedience and righteousnesse and the imputation of them for righteousnesse in the justification of true beleevers This filthie wretch was gelded for corrupting and defiling of a Maid and for his blasphemous heresies Saint Bernard and the Bishops of France caused him to be excommunicated and condemned for an Heretike and his blasphemous books to be burned publikely The next instrument of the Devill after him mentioned in former Histories was Servetus that blasphemous Heretike who for heresies and blasphemies which hee dispersed as a vagabond in several Countries in divers books was by Master Calvin discovered apprehended at Geneva condemned and burned and dyed blaspheming Christ most horribly as Beza testifieth in vita Calvini The third notorious Heretike who in writing and bookes published did maintaine this wicked errour and by his Disciples dispersed it in Transilvania Polonia and other adjoyning Countries was Faustus Socinus whose blasphemous faction and sect still continueth and infesteth those Countries at this day The fourth Grand Master and propagatour of this heresie who brought it into Holland nearer unto us was Arminius He did first secretly teach and instill it into the eares and hearts of many disciples and afterwards did openly professe it as we read in his Epistle ad Hyppolytum de collibus wherein he confesseth that he held Faith to be imputed for righteousnesse to justification not in a Metonymicall but in a proper sense And although this and other errours held by him are condemned in the late Synod of Dort yet his disciples the Remonstrants doe obstinately persist in this errour though some of that sect would seeme to decline and disclaime it The fift perverse publisher of this heresie who first openly professed it in England and in manuscript Pamphlets and Printed Bookes
any come to us and bring not the true Doctrine of Christ but damnable Socinianisme errour and heresie we must not show so much curtesie as to bid him God speed 2 Iohn 10. The Analysis of his first Chapter in generall THe first Chapter of his Socinianisme which he cals his premising of somewhat for cleare underderstanding of the state and drift of the question consists of sixe parts In the first part he goeth about to rehearse the severall significations of the words justification and justifying and to determine in what sense the words are used in those Scriptures which speake of the justification of a sinner before GOD. In the second he layes downe 4. Propositions which he takes for granted on all hands and by none denyed but Heretikes In the third he comes to speak of imputation of righteousnesse for justification or rather of somewhat which God in the act of every mans justification doth impute for or instead of righteousnesse to invest him in all priviledges of a man perfectly righteous and withall to shew the reason of this imputation and afterward to determine that Faith is that somewhat imputed In the fourth part hee shewes first negatively how Faith is not imputed and excludes out of his question fiue severally quaeres Secondly affirmatively that Faith as he holds it to be imputed is opposed to the righteousnesse of Christ as to a competitor which receives the repulse In the fift part to cover the shame and scandall of his Hereticall opinion he doth admit Christs righteousnesse into part of the honour for peace and fashion sake as Esau was admitted unto some vanishing participation of some temporary blessings with Iacob For he forgeth a strange and false kind of imaginary imputation of Christs righteousnesse unto which he laboureth to wrest the words of Luther Calvin and the Homilies and Articles of our English Church In the last part hee undertaketh to shew more light that it may be seene to the bottome clearely what he affirmes and what he denyes in the question propounded The particulars whereof we shall see when I come to the answer of them But first I will begin with the first part and will proceed to answer the rest in order Socinianisme THat the termes of Justifying Justification c. are not to be taken in this question nor in any other that are usually moved about the Justification of a sinner either 1. Physico sensu in a Physicall sence as if Justification signified to make just with any habituall actual or any positive or inhaerent righteousnesse 2. Sensu forensi proprie dicto in a juridicall or judiciary sense properly so called when the Judge hath onely a subordinate or derived power of judging and is bound by oath or otherwise to give sentence according to the rule of the Law as to justify were to pronounce a man just or to absolve him from punishment according to the strict termes or rules of that Law wherof he was accused as a transgressor though this sense be received and admitted by many But 3. and lastly Sensu forensi improprie dicto in a Iudiciary sense lesse properly and usually so called viz. Where he that sits Judge being supreme Magistrate hath an Independency and Soveraignety of power to moderate and dispense with the Law as reason and equity shall require So that justifying in this question imports the discharging or absolving of a man from the guilt blame and punishment of those things whereof he is or might justly be accused not because he is cleare of such things or justifiable according to the letter and strictnesse of the Law for then he could not be justly accused But because the Judge having a sufficient and lawfull Soveraignety of power is willing upon sufficient and weighty consideration knowne unto himselfe to remit the penalty of the Law and to deliver and discharge him as if he were an Innocent and righteous man As for that Physicall sence of making just by inhaerent righteousnesse though Bellarmine and his Angels earnestly contend for it yet till the Scriptures be brought low and Etymologie exalted above them til use and custome of speaking deliver up their Kingdome into the Cardinalls hand that sense must no way be acknowledg'd or receiv'd in this dispute yet to give reason and right even unto those that demand that which is unreasonable Its true that GOD in and upon a mans Justification begins to justifie him Physically that is to infuse habituall and inhaerent righteousnesse into him But here the Scriptures and the Cardinall are as far out in termes as in 1000. other things they are in substance and matter That which hee will needs cal Justification the Scripture will as peremptorily call Sanctification Concerning that other sense of judiciary Justification usually so called wherein the Iudge or justifier proceeds upon legall grounds to acquit and absolve the party guilty and accused neither can this be taken in the question propounded except the Scripture be forsaken because the Scripture constantly speakes of this act of GOD Iustifying a sinner not as of such an act whereby he will either make him or pronounce him legally Iust or declare him not to have offended the Law and hereupon justifie him but as of such an act whereby he freely forgives him all that he hath done against the Law and acquits him from all blame and punishment due by the Law for such offences So that in that very act of GOD by which he justifies a sinner as there is a discharge from all punishment due unto sinne so there is a profession withall or plaine intimation of the guiltinesse of the person now to be justified according to the Law and that he is not acquited or discharged upon any consideration that can be pleaded for him according to the Law but that consideration upon which GOD proceeds to justifie him is of another order the consideration of somewhat done for him in this case to relieve him out of the course or order and appointment of the Law He whose Justification stands whether in whole or in part it 's not materiall here in the forgivenesse of sinne can in no construction be said to be Iustified according to the Law because the Law knowes no forgivenesse of sinne neither is there any rule for any such thing nor the least intimation of so much as any possibility of any such thing there The Law speakes of the curse death and condemnation of a sinner but for the Justification of a sinner it neither takes knowledge nor gives any hope thereof Christianisme IN this first part here are onely three significations of the word Justification and Iustifying rehearsed The first is Naturall or Physicall that is making a man just with habituall inhaerent righteousnesse The second is a Iudiciary sense properly so called when a subordinate Iudge doth according to the strict termes and rules of the Law acquit and absolve a man from punishment which is due by the Law to him being a
transgressor and doth pronounce him just The third is a Iudiciary sense lesse properly so called when a supreme Iudge by soveraignety of power doth acquit and absolve a man and remit the penalty of the Law which he deserves upon weighty consideration knowne to himselfe and doth deliver him and discharge him as if he were an innocent and righteous man The first Physicall sense he rejects and playes upon Bellarmine for reteining and using the word Iustifie in that sense And yet he himselfe immediatly acknowledgeth that GOD upon a mans Iustification begins to Iustifie him Physically by infusing into him habituall and inhaerent righteousnesse But this he saith is in Scripture called Sanctification The second sense he also disclaimes and in this dispute embraceth the third sense to wit that Iustification signifies GODS forgiving a man freely all that he hath done against the Law and his acquiting and discharging of a man from the guilt and punishment due by the Law for such offences not for any consideration which can be pleaded for him according to the Law but for somwhat done for him in this case to relieve him out of the course order and appointment of the Law His reason why he embraceth this sense is because he conceives Iustification to stand in forgivenesse of sinne which belongs to the Law in no respect at all In all this part and passage I find not one particle of solid truth but many grosse errors and falshoods for of all the three significations of the word Iustifie by him here named onely the first may passe in some tollerable construction but not in his sense for though GOD in the creation made our first Parents after his owne Image and similitude in perfect righteousnesse indued with a naturall and habituall uprightnesse conformable to his revealed will and Law and in this respect may be said to have Iustified that is made them upright as the wise Preacher saith Eccles. 7.29 GOD made man upright Yet whether this act of creation was a Physicall act of GOD or rather a voluntary act of his will of his wisdome and counsell and so may be called Artificial is something disputable As for the framing and making of the man Christ the blessed seed by the power of the holy Ghost pure holy upright and iust from his first conception this was a spirituall and supernaturall act and the holinesse and righteousnesse was a supernaturall gift given from above not introduced by naturall generation nor raised from naturall principles That making of men righteous in their sanctification which Bellarmine speaks of is not iustification in a naturall but in a spirituall sense For the spirit of GOD worketh those habits and graces of holinesse in men whom GOD hath begotten of his owne will in the word of truth And therefore when Bellarmine or Goodwin or any other call this a Physicall iustifying they erre grossely For if it be any iustification at all it is spirituall and morall But for my part I finde not that by the Spirit of GOD in Scripture any habituall holinesse of men begun in this life is called righteousnesse simply in it selfe But as the Saints regenerate and faithfull are called righteous in respect of their communion with Christ and participation of his righteousnes So their sanctity or habituall holinesse is called righteousnesse not simply in it selfe but by coniunction with the righteousnesse of Christ the head of the body which as it iustifies them by constituting and making them righteous so also it iustifies their rectified holy actions which they performe by the moâ—ions of the spirit and by Faith in Christ as learned Beza well observed and truth affirmeth Lib. contra Anonymum and their sanctification cannot be called iustification but by reason of coniunction with iustification in the same person For if it were possible for a sinfull man to be made perfectly holy and conformable to GODS Law in his owne person yet having formerly transgressed the Law and failed in many things â—his nâ—w conformity to the Law by reason of those sinnes and failings will prove a lame righteousnesse not fit to satisfie the Law and to be accepted for perfect righteousnesse to justification because if a man keepe the whole Law and faile in one point he is guilty of all Iam. 2 10. No righteousnesse can justifie which is not a perfect obedience and conformity of the whole man to the whol law in his whole life froÌ„ the beginning to the end Secondly that signification of the word Iustification which hee calls a judiciary sense properly so called is as he describes it a foolish fiction of his owne braine for never did any but a mad-man dreame of Iustifying sinners by a subordinate Judge absolving them from punishment according to the strict termes and rules of the Law for that were to give a false sentence and to pronounce a man free from all transgression of the Law and a perfect fulfiller of it in his owne person All our learned and Iudicious Divines doe hold that the full satisfaction and obedience of CHRIST being communicated and imputed to true believers they are absolved and have their sinnes pardoned and are counted and iudged righteous by GOD as men who have satisfied the Iustice and iust Law of GOD by CHRIST their head and surety not in their own persons which the Law in strict termes requires this is justification in the Iudiciary sense which is approved by the learned Thirdly that Iudiciary sense improperly so called which he approves allows in this dispute is an Hereticall and Socinian conceipt for so long as GOD the supreme Iudge of all the world is immutable and infinite in Iustice he neither can nor will dispense with his eternall iust Law in any iot or tittle but will have it perfectly fulfilled either by our selves or some sufficient surety in our behalfe and will forgive no sinner without a full suffering and satisfaction made to the Law in the same kind which the law requires though not in every mans person and this full satisfaction must be communicated to every one and made his owne by union with CHRIST his head before that GOD will iudge or account him righteous and pardon al his sinnes To imagin a somewhat in consideration whereof GOD forgives sinners and accepts them as if they were righteous besides the full satisfaction of GODS Justice and just law is to conceive GOD to bee mutable and not the same in his infinite justice at all times and to affirme it is Samosatenian and Socinian Blasphemy Fourthly in arguing against the second sense by him propounded he wrestles with his owne shadow and fights against a fiction of his owne braine and discovers his blindnesse and ignorance of the dictinction and difference betweene Legal and Evangelicall justification and righteousnesse Legal righteousnesse is the condition of the first covenaÌ„t of works and consists in perfect conformity and obedience to the law performed by every man in his owne person and
receives either the inward testimony of the Spirit and is enlightned by GOD to see that he is in the state of righteousnesse absolved and iustified or by inward sense of his sanctification Faith and other graces proper to the righteous iustified is declared and made manifest to his owne conscience that he is justified and righteous and hath all his sinnes pardoned and is accepted of GOD for a righteous man This is that which wee are taught by Christ to pray for in that petition forgive us our debts or trespasses that is pacify and cleare our consciences by manifesting to us that we are justified and have remission of all our sinnes by thy free grace and by communion of Christs full satisfaction and thus wee are to understand the word wheresoever it is opposed to the accusations of Satan and the horrours and troubles of conscience as a remedie against them as Rom 8.33 Secondly it signifies declaring and proving men righteous in foro humano in the judgement and sight of men openly and that by outward fruites of Faith and externall workes of righteousnes and holinesse When GOD enableing us and moving us to doe such workes and bring forth such fruites as are by his word continually pronounced and proclaimed to be righteous and holy works and evidences of justification doth thus declare and prove us to be faithfull and righteous hee is said to justifie us before men In this sense the word is used Iob 13.18 where Iob saith that if hee may plead before GOD the integrity of his life he knoweth hee shall be justified as afterward he did cap. 31. and was thereby declared to be righteous and so justified And Iam. 2.21 where it is 〈◊〉 that Abraham was justified by workes that is declared to be a righteous man Thirdly it signifies judging and declaring men to bee persons justified and righteous in the universall judgement at the last day when the LORD Christ shall by the evidence of their workes of love and charity done to him in his members declare them to bee his faithfull servants and children of his Father justified by the communion of his righteousnes and in him worthie of eternall life and also adjudge them unto the inheritance of the kingdome of Glory In this sense the word is used Rom. 5.16.18 where it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justification of life and is opposed to the sentence of everlasting condemnation These are all the significations of the word iustifie recorded in the Scriptures And this great promiser here sheweth himselfe ignorant of them all and therefore how little satisfaction he hath given to any but such fooles as delight to fill themselves with huskes let the learned iudge Socinianisme THat Iesus Christ the naturall sonne of GOD and supernaturall sonne of the Virgin Marie ran a race of obedience with the Law as well Ceremoniall as Morall and held out with every letter iot and title of it as farre as it any wayes concerned him dureing the whole continuance of his life in the flesh no mans thoughts ever rose up to deny but those that denyed him the best of his being I meane his God-head which of you can convince mee of sinne was his chalenge to the nation of the Iewes whilst he was yet on earth Iohn 8.46 And remaines through all ages as a challenge to the whole World He that can cast the least aspersion of sinne upon Christ shall shake the foundation of the peace and safety of the Church That this Christ offered himself as a Lamb without spot in sacrifice upon the Crosse to make an atonement for the World and to purge the sinnes of it I know no spirit at this day abroad in the world that denyes but that which wrought in Socinus formerly and still workes in those that are baptized into the same spirit of errour with him I conceive it to bee a truth of greater authority amongst us then to meet with contradiction from any that Iesus Christ is the sole entire meritorious cause of every mans iustification that is iustified by GOD or that that righteousnesse or absolution from sinne and condemnation which is given to every man in his iustification is somewhat yea a principall part of that great purchase which Christ hath made for the world even as GOD for Christs sake freely forgave you Forgivenesse of sinnes or iustification is from GOD for Christs sake hee is worthie to be gratified or honoured by GOD with the iustification of those that beleeve in him It 's a truth which hath every mans iudgement concurrent with it that Faith is the condition appointed by GOD and required on mans part to bring him into communion and fellowship of that iustification and redemption which Christ hath purchased for the children of men and that without beleeving no man can have part or fellowship in that great and blessed businesse Christianisme IN this second part he doth promise foure severall propositions which hee conceives to bee out of question and undenyable By the first proposition hee makes a faire shew in words but his heart is farre removed and his meaning is wicked and so will appeare if we observe how hee in another place afterwards explaines himselfe First though hee seemes to acknowledge Christ to bee GOD yet he takes away the use of his being GOD as well as man in the worke of our redemption For if GOD by his supreme sovereigne power can dispense with the law of his iustice and instead of Christs full satisfaction made for us to the law and imputed to us and made ours can and doth accept our weake Faith for the perfect righteousnesse of the Law what use is there of Christs being GOD in our nature For all Orthodox Divines doe give this reason why it was necessary that Christ should be GOD in our nature viz. That his suffering and righteousnesse performed in our nature might be of value to iustifie all the sonnes of men who have communion of them and to whom they are imputed This communion and imputation while he denyeth hee takes away the use of Christs being GOD in our nature Secondly in affirming that Christ obeyed the whole Law in every letter jot and title he doth mock and delude his hearers and readers for he doth not hold that he fulfilled the Law onely for us but primarily for himselfe his words imply so much for he saith he obeyed the Law as far as concerned himselfe while he continued in the flesh and he dorh hereafter roundly affirme that Christ was bound to fulfill the Law for himselfe which is in effect a denying of his eternall God-head for if he be GOD infinite in glory and excellency his God-head must needes exempt the Manhood personally united to it from all bondage of the Law and make it worthy of glory at GODS right hand from the first assumption of it He continued in the flesh and obeyed the Law onely for us without all doubt as the Prophet foretold Esa. 9.6
saying To us a Child is borne and to us a Son is given Thirdly as he denies the satisfaction of Christ to be imputed to us so he denies the imputation of our sinnes to Christ and that very closely and cunningly under colour of that challenge which Christ made to the Iewes which of you can convince me of sinne For our Saviour speakes of sinne committed by himselfe and such aspersion none can say upon him But all our iniquities GOD laid upon him and he bare all our sinnes Esa. 53. And was made sinne for us 2 Cor. 5 21. and to cast this aspersion of all our sinnes on him is a sure foundation of the peace and safety of the Church In the second proposition hee doth most notoriously aequivocate and play the Hypocrite First in that he seemes to acknowledg the sacrifice of Christ to be an attonement and satisfaction for the world and a propitiatory sacrifice for the sinne of it Secondly in that he denyeth his Lord and Master Socinus and calles the Spirit which wrought in him a Spirit of error whereas indeed he himselfe is lead by the same Spirit and doth deny Christ to be the propitiatory sacrifice for our sinnes as far as Socinus ever did For in a propitiatory sacrifice offered to purge sinne and to make attonement there were three necessary requisits First the thing offered must be of his owne proper goods for whom it was offered so the Law required and therefore David durst not offer for his sinne that which was not his owne Purchased with his money 2. Sam. 24 24. Secondly the owner whose expiatory sacrifice it was did lay his hand upon the head of the Beast which was to be offered and thereby in a type imposed all his sinne and guilt upon it so that it became 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his sin 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his guilt Levit 5 6. and Exod. 30.10 and did beare upon it all his sins Lev. 16.22 Thirdly this sacrifice offered up by the Priest in that manner which GOD praescribed in the Law GOD accepted as a propitiation for him it was set on his skore and covered his sinne as the Hebrew words signifie Levit. 1.4 He who denies any one of these overthrowes the sacrifice of attonement Now this dissembler doth with Socinus deny all these things in Christs offering of himselfe a sacrifice of attonement to purge sinne First he denies the true reall Spirituall union betweene Christ and the persons pardoned and justified by which Christ and they are made one body and hee is their head and they his members For if he and the faithfull be one then all his goods are theirs and their debts are his and his satisfaction and righteousnesse is theirs and is set on their skore which he denyeth and altogether opposeth and so denyes their interest and propriety in Christ and their union with him as his Master Wotton did in expresse word In his Essayes of Justification Secondly he also denieth that the sinnes of the faithfull were layd on Christ and imputed to him and in this he chargeth GOD with notorious injustice who laid the punishments of all our sinnes on Christ without the sinnes For he saith that Christ bare the punishmeÌ„ts though hee had no share in our sinnes by any imputation Thirdly he denyeth that the sacrifice of Christs suffering and obedience offered up by him is imputed to us set on our skore and accepted for us And thus in the doctrine of Christs sanitisfaction and attonement he declares himselfe a true disciple of Socinus lead by the same spirit of error and of the same opinion though in words he denyes it And what he here seemes to grant is no more but what all Socinians yeeld unto In the third proposition viz. that Christ is the sole and entire miraculous cause of every mans justification c. Hee doth aequivocate and delude the simple and while hee deceives them hee is deceived himselfe as the Apostle saith of wicked seducers 2 Tim. 3 13. For if he doth understand his owne words that Christ is the sole meritorious cause of every mans justification that is justified by GOD he must needs grant that Christs satisfaction made to GODS justice and his perfect righteousnesse as it is meritorious and of great value in it selfe so it is appropriated communicated imputed to him that is it is made actually meritorious for him and makes him worthy to be counted righteous and to be iustified for his words signify so much though hee is in his purpose and meaning as contrary as darknesse is to light for he meanes no more but that Christ meritted for himselfe that GOD should gratifie and honour him with the justification of those that believe in him so hee explaines himselfe in the last words It is certaine that a thing may be merritorious in it selfe for the worth of it but it cannot be meritorious to any particular person till it be appropriated to him and set on his skore Wotton his Master this point being proved to his face with undeniable arguments was driven to disclaime the word merit denyed Christs meritting for the faithfull and rejected it as a thing not named in Scripture in his Essayes of Justification Besides this deceiving of himselfâ— and misconceiving of his owne words I find here much absurdity First in that he is wavering and not setled in his Iudgment for in many places he holds faith to be the righteousnesse of a man justified and here he calles absolvtion from sinne and condemnation the righteousnesse which is given to every man in his justification I grant that in a man iustified there is no righteousnesse inhaerent but his cleanenesse from guilt of all sinnes both of commission and omission and in this sense Calvin Luther and others say that all the righteousnesse in a man iustified is the remission of his sinnes that is his cleanenesse from the guilt of them but this is not the righteousnesse which iustifieth him and which is communicated to him to make him cleane and to worke this cleannesse from the guilt of his sin that is the righteousnesse inhaerent in Christ which makes him cleane and puts him in a stare of righteousnesse before GOD but this profound Doctor with that stamp and superscription of rationall authority which hee conceiveth to be set on him hath not yet searched into the deep things oâ— GOD. Secondly he is most absurd in imagining that Christ hath purchased favour and honour witâ— GOD that he might iustifie theâ—… that believe in him by Procuring that faith in a proper sense should be accepted for righteousnesse For Christ as he was GOD man was infinitely of himselfe in favour and honour with GOD and humbled himselfe onely for us and in our behalfe fulfilled the Law not to purchace honour and favour to himselfe nor to make himselfe worthy to be gratified and honored by GOD as hee affirmeth Thus wee see his absurdities and his deceiving of himselfe The fourth
of obedience none denyeth For suppose our Saviour by reason of imprisonment or some other restraint and impediment had beene hindered from doing divers of those workes of mercy charity and piety which hee did performe being at liberty this had not diminished his righteousnes so long as he had a ready will to doe good upon all occasions and did good workes when liberty and opportunity served Secondly none of our Divines doe thinke or write that Christs righteousnes imputed and communicated to beleevers doth make them rigidly literally and peremptorily righteous constituted and made us perfectly compleatly and legally righteous as Christ himselfe for though they are iustifiâ—d by the Communion of Christs satisfaction and have so much interest in it as to make them truely righteous yet they have it not as Christ hath it performed legally by himselfe in his owne person neither have they power to give the Spirit whereby they may communicate it to others to justifie them to make them righteous The Wife is endowed with her Husbands honours and riches and made honourable and rich but she is not endowed with her Husbands Lordship and dominion over them so far that she may give them away at her pleasure but onely posseseth them in him and with him for her owne use And so it is betweene Christ and the faithfull he is righteous rigidly and legally according to the letter of the Law They are righteous Evangelically by the Communion of his righteousnes that is originally righteous as the head in a naturall body is sensitive and hath sense and motion in it as the root and fountaine They are righteous by Communion from him and possesse his righteousnes as all the rest of the members in a living body possesse life by derivation from the heart not in the same degree as the heart doth to communicate it to others but every one so far as to be a living member Therefore all that hee here saith is but subtilty calumny and falsehood neither Scriptures nor any sound and learned Authors will minister arguments or demonstrations to him to prove any thing contrary to our Doctrine concerning the imputation of Christs righteousnes for iustification The more he strives to wrest and abuse testimonies of Scripture and learned Authors the more evident demonstrations will he give of his wickednesse and wilfull contending against GODS sacred truth Socinianisme GIve me leave here to mention that by the way which prevents many mistakes yea and offences too in reading the writings of many later Divines especially of other Churches touching this point of Justification If we take the phrase of imputing Christs righteousnes unproperly and out of the usuall and formall signification of it as Luther and Calvin and other Divines of the reformed Churches sometimes doe in their writings viz For the giving out and bestowing as it were the righteousnes of Christ in the returne of it that is in the priviledges blessings and benefits that are procured and purchased by it for men So a beleever may be said to be justified by the righteousnes of Christ imputed But then the meaning can be no more but this A beleever is justified by the imputation of Christs righteousnes That is GOD justifies a beleever for Christs righteousnes sake and not for any righteousnes of his owne Such an imputation of the righteousnes of Christ as this is is no wayes denyed or once questioned And thus such passages as those in Calvin GOD freely justifies us by imputing the obedience of Christ unto us Instit. 1. c. 3.11 and againe a man is not righteous in himselfe but because the righteousnes of Christ is communicated or imparted to him by imputation these and such like expressions in this Author are to be interpreted by such passages as these which are frequent in the same Author Christ by his obedience procured and merited for us grace and favour with GOD the Father and againe Instit. 1.2.17 and againe 1.3 c. 11.12 Christ by his obedience procured or purchased righteousnes for us And againe in Gal. 3.6 All such expressions as these import the same thing that wee are justified by the grace of GOD that Christ is our righteousnesse and that righteousnes was procured for us by the death and resurrection of Christ. By all which passages and many more of like importment that might be produced out of the same Author it s fully evident that where he mentions any imputation of the righteousnes of Christs in justification the meaning is onely this that the righteousnes of Christ is onely the meritorious cause of our justification and hee hath procured and purchased this for us at GODS hand that upon our beleeving we should bee accounted righteous by him or which is but the same that our faith should be imputed for righteousnes to us To which purpose hee speakes more significantly and expressely in the place last mentioned Gal. 3.6 men not having righteousnes lodged in them they obtaine it by imputation which imputation he thus explicates and interprets Because GOD doth impute or account their faith unto them for righteousnes Divers like passages might be drawne together out of other Authors which must be seasoned with the same salt of interpretation to bee made savorie and meet for spirituall nourishment In the Homilies of our Church there are severall passages that mention the imputation of Christs righteousnes in justification for the genuine sense whereof if wee consult with the 11. article of Religion which is concerning justification and is framed with all possible exactnes this way that so few words are capable of that will lead us directly to the same interpretation of them Wee are accounted righteous before GOD saith our Article onely for the merit of our LORD and Saviour Iesus Christ by faith and not for our owne workes or deservings Where it s to be observed that we are not said to bee constituted or made righteous before GOD in justification but onely that we are accounted or reputed such 2. It s not said that wee are accounted righteous with the righteousnes nor yet with the merit of Christ but onely wee are accounted righteous before GOD onely for the merit of our LORD Christ by faith The merit of Christ or of his righteousnes hath so farre prevailed with GOD on our behalfe that by our faith we shall bee accounted righteous before him which is in effect the same truth wee maintaine viz. that GOD for Christs sake or for Christs merits sake doth impute our faith for righteousnes unto us And thus Musculus expresseth himselfe roundly Faith is accounted for righteousnes for Christs sake And againe Loc. com de justifica This faith ought to be esteemed of us as that which GOD purposeth for Christs sake to impute for righteousnes to those that beleeve in him So Luther also ad Gal. 3.6 GOD for Christs sake accounts this imperfect faith for perfect righteousnes And Chamier calls remission of sinnes the righteousnes which is imputed to us
words then these of Calvin for if a man bee not righteous in himselfe then is hee not righteous by faith in a proper sense for his faith in a proper sense is in himselfe But let us not bee too hastie to insult over his folly it may bee his impudency will catch at some other words of Calvin which do not so expressely contradict him but are more obscure and them hee will wrest and abuse to expound Calvins plaine words in a contradictory sense It is even so indeed for hee cites in the next place some more generall and obscure speeches of Calvin to expound his plaine words and to make them contradictory to themselves I have heard absurd fellowes derided for going about to shew obscurum perobscurius that is to make men see dark things through greater darknesse and for running as the proverb is out of GODS blessing into the warme sun But that any should goe about to make others see the sun when it shineth in full strength by the dimme light of a candle and to perswade them that the sun is the moone this is madnes deserves that the Lunatike Melancholike person so doing should be sent to the Iland of Hellebore there to inhabit till hee recover his wits And doth not he so who seekes to make Calvins plaine words to contradict themselves by citing words wherein he speakes neither so plainely nor so fully as in them But let us see those other speeches of Calvin which hee brings for this purpose one is that Christ by his obedience hath merited and procured for us favour with GOD his Father These words doe not prove that the imputing of Christs obedience and righteousnesse signifies the bestowing of the benefit of it on us that is GODS favour but shew clearely the contrary to that which he intends namely that Christs obedience is made ours and imputed to us because it procures to us the favour of GOD which we cannot enjoy nor appeare gracious in his sight unlesse wee bee cloathed with Christs rich robe of righteousnes and washed cleane from the guilt of sinne by his satisfaction imputed to us Another is Christ by his obedience hath purchased righteousnes for us the true and plaine sense of which wordes is no more but this that Christ by his obedience hath fulfilled the Law of GOD for us and we by that obedience are constituted made righteous as the Apostle expressely affirmes Rom. 5.19 Another is that when we are said to be justified by the grace of GOD and that righteousnes was procured by the death and resurrection of Christ these expressions import the same thing with those that Christ is our righteousnes that is by union with him and communion of his righteousnes which he purchased by his death and resurrection and which GOD graciously gives to us wee are justified Another is men having not any righteousnes in themselves they obtaine it by imputation that is neither a mans owne workes nor faith taken in a proper sense for a gift grace or worke in him can be his righteousnes but onely that which is obtained by imputation to wit Christs righteousnes apprehended by faith which when true beleevers have laid hold on then GOD doth account them righteous and in this improper sense GOD is said to impute faith for righteousnes Thus every speech of Calvin which he brings against Calvin himselfe is like a stone cast against a brasen wall and rebounds against the caster and dasheth out the braines of his hereticall opinion And therefore it was his safest course onely to tell us of more such passages but not to recite any more out of Calvin or other Authors For being seasoned with the salt of their owne interpretation they will prove gravell in his mouth choake him and if it be possible put him to shame and silence From Calvin hee comes home to the Homilies allowed in our Church and they by his owne confession teach that we are justified by the imputation of Christs righteousnes But to prove that by the righteousnes of Christ they meane faith taken in a proper sense that is as it is the gift of faith in us and the operation of it in us even our beleeving hee brings the words of the 11. Article of Religion allowed in our Church by Law viz. we are ac counted righteous before GOD onely for the merit of our LORD and Saviour Jesus Christ by faith not for our owne workes or deserts where note that whereas the Articles send us to the Homilies as being very profitable plaine expositions of them hee on the contrary sets the cart before the horses to draw them after it Hee brings the text to expound the commentary or plaine exposition of it But hee gets no advantage by doing so for the words of the Article are very exact indeed and make much for us against his opinion they shew that the merit of Christ apprehended by faith is that for which wee are accounted righteous before GOD and that faith is not our righteousnes for then wee should bee accounted righteous for a grace in our selves and for a worke of our owne performed by us even our owne beleeving Oh but the Article doth not say that wee are constituted and made but onely accounted righteous True indeed the Article doth not speak of fundamentall justification mentioned Rom. 5.19 but of imputative justification of which the Apostle speakes Rom. 4 3. which necessarily presupposeth the other For GOD whose judgement is according to truth cannot judge and count us righteous till hee hath communicated Christs righteousnesse to us and by it constituted and made us righteous which when we by faith receive and apply by the assistance of his Spirit which dwells in us and makes us one Spirituall and mysticall body with Christ then GOD accounts us righteous and by our faith and believing we obtene as Abraham did this testimony from GOD that we are righteous as Iustine Martyr saith in the words cited in the next Chapter From the Article and Homilies hee proceedes to Musculus Luther and Chamier who though in their Doctrine they are opposit to his opinion as heaven is to earth yet hee snatcheth here and there some improper speeches out of their writings which hee wresteth to his purpose though they doe most plainely expound their owne meaneing to bee contrary to his mind The words of Musculus are these Faith is accounted for righteousnesse for Christs sake That is faith is accounted for righteousnesse and the true believer is counted a righteous man not sensu proprio nec per se sed propter Christum That is by reason of Christ and his righteousnesse whom the believer apprehendeth and by faith possesseth his righteousnesse and againe this faith ought to be esteemed of us as that which GOD purposeth for Christs sake to impute for righteousnesse to those that believe in him in which words Musculus folowing the phrase of the Apostle intends no more but this that wee
way and what not Now that which GOD precisely requires of men to their justification in stead of the works of the Law is their faith or to beleeve in the proper and formall signification He doth not require of us the righteousnes of Christ for our justification this hee required of Christ himselfe that which hee requires of us for this purpose is our faith in Christ. Therefore to certifie or say unto them that the righteousnes of Christ should be imputed to them for righteousnes would fall short of his scope and intent this way which was plainely and directly this to make known unto them the counsaile and good pleasure of GOD concerning that which was to be done and performed by them to their justification which he affirmeth from place to place to be nothing else but their faith in Christ or beleeving whereas to have said thus unto them that they must be justified by Christ or by Christs righteousnes and withall not to have plainely signified what GOD requires of them and will accept at their hand to give them fellowship in that righteousnes For justification which is by Christ and without which they could not be justified had beene rather to cast a snare upon them then to have opened a dore of life and salvation unto them Christianisme His second way of arguing to proue his opinions from the scope of the place and the intent of the Apostle in this discourse of justification His maine argument reduced into forme runs thus The scope of the place and intent of the Apostle is to hedg up with thornes the false way of justification which lay through works and to turne men from it as also to discover the true way to them to wit what they must do and what GOD requireth of them to their justification and what hee will accept at their hands instead of the workes of the Law and that is it which he here saith is imputed for righteousnesse But faith and believing in a proper and formall signification is that which they must do and performe to their justification which also GOD requires of them instead of workes of the Law and will accept at their hands instead of them Therefore faith in a proper sense is here said to be imputed To this argument I answere First that in the first proposition there is some truth affirmed but immediately contradicted and many falsehoodes intermingled That the Apostles scope and intent is to hedge up the false way of justification which lay through workes and to discover the ture way we grant for truth But like a mad or drunken man he immediately contradicts the truth which he had affirmed and tels us that the right way is doing and performing something which GOD requires at our hands to our iustification And what is this but the way which lyes through workes For to doe and perform somthing required of us that it may be accepted of GOD at our hands to our justification is to seek justification by the way of working in the judgement of men that are sober and in their wits Besides this manifest contradiction I find also much falshood and evill meaning 1. In saying the truth that the false way lyeth through works that is works performed in obedience to the Law by every man in his own person which is the true intent and meaning of the Apostle he hath a further wicked meaning namely that our seeking after the righteousnesse of Christ which consists in his works of obedience to the Law is the way which lyeth through works to justification and therefore the false way And this he declares to be his meaning in that he immediatly after labours to beat men off from Christs righteousnesse Wherfore I justly tax him here not onely of blasphemy in calling the righteousnesse Christ who is the way the truth and the life and seeking justification through it a false way but also of stupidity and blindnesse in that he cannot see the difference between our seeking justification by the righteousnesse offered to us in the Gospel to be apprehended by faith even Christs righteousnesse and our doing works of the Law for our justification or Christs performing works of the Law in his own person For Christs righteousnesse as it was performed by himselfe was legall and according to the strict termes of the Law but as it comes to us by communion and is applyed by faith it is Euangelicall 2. In that he saith God requires somthing to be done of men for their Justification which God imputes to them and accepts at their hands instead of the works or righteousnesse of the Law Hereby he sets up justification by some thing which a man doth and performeth which the Apostle altogether opposeth in this discourse and his whole scope is bent against it and his whole intent and drift is to shew that we are justified not by giving or doing but by receiving that which is freely given of GOD and reputed for righteousnes even the righteousnesse of him who is GOD and is called therfore the righteousnesse of God Chap. 3.21 and 10.3 Hereby also he brings in a doing and performing of somthing by men which is accepted of God over and above that which the Law requireth which is a meere Popish fiction tending to dishonour the Law and to make it an imperfect rule of mans wel doing And withall he makes the new Covenant a condicionall Covenant and not of free Grace promising justification and salvation upon condition of mens doing In the second place his assumption wherein he affirms that faith and beleeving in the proper and formall signification is that which men must doe and performe and which God requires and will accept at their hands instead of works of the Law for justification it contains in it most grosse Socinian errour and much absurdity and untruth First in that he calls faith and beleeving a thing done and performed by men this is directly contrary to the Apostle who teacheth that faith is not of our selves but is the gift of God Ephes. 2.8 and that we of our selves are not sufficient to think much lesse to do that which God can accept but our sufficiencies of God 2 Cor. 3.5 and it is God which worketh in us both to will and to doe of his good pleasure Phil. 2.13 so that faith and beleeving are not a condition performed by us to oblige God but a part of the Grace freely promised in the Covenant and given to us even the worke and motion of his Spirit in us Secondly in that he sets up faith instead of all righteousnesse and perfect fullfilling of the Law hereby he doth professe himselfe a Socinian Hereticke in plain terms and conspires with those Heretickes to overthrow the justice of God in our justification and to make Christs satisfaction vaine and needlesse as I have before shewed After his arguing for the imputation of faith he proceeds here in his second way of arguing as he did in the former
is neither ascribed unto the act it selfe there mentioned which is here Abrahams beleeving nor to the obiect mentioned likewise with it which is here GOD Abraham beleeved GOD but to something really differing from them both not so much as once mentioned in all the discourse as namely to the righteousnes of Christ what is this but to turne a mans back upon the text to looke out an interpretation to exchange that which is plainly affirmed with what is not so much as is obscurely intimated or implyed to make the Apostle to speake as never man spake besides not for the wisedom and excellency of his speech but for the uncouth abstrusenes of his meaning Doubtlesse no instance is to be found of any Author whatsoever sacred or prophane who so farre abhorred to be understood in what he spake as to put his mind into wordes of such a construction Thirdly and lastly neither is the righteousnesse of Christ the object of faith as justifying as hath bin said nor doth the Scripture where it speaks of faith as justifying which are places not a few make the least mention or give the least intimation of such a thing It is true the Scriptures often propound the righteousnes of Christ or his obedience to the law as that which is to be beleeved and so it may be termed a partiall object of faith somewhat that is and ought to be beleeved but so the creation of the world is propounded to bee beleeved and that Cain was Adams sonne is somewhat to bee beleeved And generally whatsoever the Scriptures affirme may be called a partiall obiect of faith But the obiect of faith properly as it iustifieth is either Christ himselfe or the promise of GOD concerning the Redemption and salvation of the world by him The righteousnes of Christ is no more the object of faith as iustifying then either his being borne of a Virgin or his ascending into heaven or the like and either the one or the other might as well be here said to be imputed to Abraham for righteousnes in that respect as his righteousnesse Thus you see at large how many passages and circumstances in the context stand up in contestation with that exposition which by Pauls faith in this Chapter will needes understand Christs righteousnesse Answere THat which I have noted before gives light to see many tergiversations and much trifling in this passage Let mee onely here desire him to repeat the wordes which he chiefly stands upon to wit Abraham beleeved GOD and it was imputed to him for righteousnesse and tell mee whether righteousnes bee not named which was imputed to Abraham and all who truely beleeve as appeares verse 6. and 11. and what righteousnesse can bee found fit to justifie a man before GOD besides Christs righteousnesse Socinianisme FOurthly and lastly this interpretation we contend for according to which the word faith or beleeving is to bee taken properly in all the passages mentioned and not tropically or metonymically was the common interpretation anciently received and followed by the Church of GOD from the primitive times and for 1500. yeares was never questioned or contradicted neither did the contrary opinion ever looke out into the world till the yesterday of the last age I speak this somewhat above the analogie and proportion of mine owne reading in matters of antiquitie which I confesse will not amount to any such confidence but I am confident in this behalfe upon the undertaking of another who searched diligently what interpretation of this Scripture ruled amongst the learned and Orthodox writers from time to time so that it is but a calumny of evill report brought upon the opinion and interpretation of this Scripture which we maintaine unworthy the tongue or pen of any learned or sober man to make either Arminius or Socinus the Authors or first founders of either And for the last hundred yeares and upward from Luther and Calvins times the fairest streame of interpreters so runs as to water and refresh the same interpretation you will easily incline I presume to beleeve both the one and the other that both former and latter times have beene friends and favourers to the interpretation given if you will please with diligence and without partiality to examine these few testimonies and passages following as they stand in their severall Authors respectively Christianisme HEre he enters into his fourth last way of confirmation that is to confirme his opinion and interpretation by testimony of learned Divines both ancient and moderne writers even from the Primitive times to the yeare 150. after Christ. His beginning is with great swelling words and with wonderfull confidence though builded not upon any reading or knowledg of his owne but upon the testimony of another doubtles of some Socinian braggadogo or impudent Arminian whom hee is ashamed to name who are all of this spirit that when they build upon weakest ground and are most strongly convinced by testimonies of Scripture and unanswerable arguments then they affirme and outface most impudently and brag and ly as if they contended to winne the whetstone Nay we think that this confession of his small reading is out of modesty or out of Satanicall subtilty that as the Divel in the person of the Serpent vented his lies to our first Parents so he may belch out desperate lies and forgeries under the person of another concealed Author verily I feare the latter because on anothers word hee doth so boldly and impudently charge all the learned of the best note in this age with calumny and false report raised upon his opinion unworthy the tongue and pen of sober and learned men in that they make Arminius or Socinus chiefe and first Authors of it and with out blushing affirmes that the fairest streame of interpreters from the time of Luther and Calvin runnes as water to refresh his interpretation In both which I find such manifest falsehood that no man of any reading can so speake and affirme without a brasen face maintaining wilfull and manifest lies against his owne conscience First to the bold charge of our learned Divines with calumny for taxing Socinus and Arminius as chiefe and first Authors of his opinion I answere That although that infamous heretick Petrus Abailardus who was gelded for his incontinence by a man whose daughter hee had abused laid the first ground of this opinion that Christs satisfaction is not imputed to iustification as Saint Bernard shewes Epist. 190. Yet the first Authors who expressely affirmed that fides per se that is faith by it selfe in a proper sense without a trope is by the Apostle said to be imputed for righteousnes were Servetus as Calvin shewes in opusculis Socinus part 4. cap. 4 and 11. de Christo Servatore And Arminius in Epist. ad Hippolitum de collibus thes 5. Secondly to his false pretence of the maine streame of writers since Luther and Calvin so running as water to refresh his interpretation I do answere and
confidently affirme that there is not one Orthodox writer to be found since that time which ever held that faith in a proper sense is imputed for righteousnes and denyed the imputation of Christs righteousnes Servetus Socinus Arminius and the rest of their sect branded for hereticks are the onely maintainers of that opinion To his testimonies and his impudent boasting of the generall consent of interpreters I answere First joyntly and in generall That of all the testimonies which hee hath cited there is not one which either affirmes that faith taken in a proper sense is imputed for righteousnesse or denies the imputation of Christs righteousnes Moreover that all Divines who are the most zealous opposers of his interpretation may say the same words which he cites out of Authors and yet hold justification by Christs righteousnes imputed yea and in proving that truth may with good reason presse and urge the same words rightly understood Soe that a more odious example of folly and impudency cannot be shewed then hee here shewes himselfe by making his folly strive for Mastery with his impudency Secondly for the particular testimonies which he brings both out of ancient and moderne writers They say no more but what Saint Paul saith and wee all acknowledg and embrace for truth viz. That Abraham beleeving that in Christ and through his satisfaction GOD was become his reward was thereupon counted righteous and GOD counted faith to him for righteousnes and so are we all iustified not by our owne righteousnes of workes performed to the Law in our own persons but by faith laying hold on the righteousnes of Christ which is counted for righteousnes not in a proper sense but relatively as it comprehends Christ and his righteousnes which Calvin calls apprehending the goodnes of GOD and trusting in it First for Tertullians words I take them as he doth render and rehearse them and so the rest in order and will take a light view of them that wee may see his vanity in citing testimonies which make nothing for him but some directly against his opinion Tertulian Lib. 5. c. 3 against Marcion BVt how the children of faith and of whose faith if not of Abrahams for if Abraham beleeved GOD and it was deputed to him for righteousnesse and hee thereby obtained the name of the father of many nations wee by beleeving GOD are therefore much rather iustified as Abraham was And lib. de patientia cap. 6. Abraham beleeved and was deputed by him to righteousnesse but hee tried his faith by patience when he was commanded to sacrifice his sonne All this wee grant for here is not a word of imputing faith in a proper sense onely an affirmation that Abraham by beleeving obtained this at GODS hands that he was accounted and reputed to be in the state of a righteous man which we all professe Origen in Epist. ad Romanos Cap. 4. verse 5. IT seemes in this present place that whereas many beleevings of Abraham werk before now in this beleeving his whole faith was gathered together and so was reputed to him for righteousnesse and againe in the same place Abraham was not by GOD testified to bee righteous for his circumcision but for his faith for before his circumcision hee beleeved GODS and it was counted to him for righteousnesse If Origens meaning be as Beza gathered from these and other wordes in that place that Abrahams faith and all his acts of beleeving made up a perfect righteousnesse and conformity to GOD will and law then is hee in as great an errour as the Papists who set up iustification by a mans owne inherent righteousnesse and his testimony is to be abhorred But if his meaning bee that by his beleeving and not by his circumcision he obtained from GOD this testimony that he was righteous by a righteousnesse beleeved then he is full for us and against his interpretation Justine Martyr Dialog with Trypho ABraham not for his circumcision but for his faith obtained the testimony of righteousnesse for before he was circumcised it is said of him Abraham beleeved GOD and it was counted to him for righteousnesse Wee grant that Abraham beleeving GOD to bee his reward in Christ this faith was the evidence of his being righteous by apprehension of Christ and his righteousnesse and therefore by it he obtained a testimony from GOD that he was in the state of righteousnes And Justine Martyres words say the same and so he is cleare for us against them who make faith the righteousnes imputed in a proper sense and not the evidence of righteousnesse Chrysostome on Rom. 4.23 saith that the Apostle HAving spoken many and great things concerning Abraham and his faith saith wherefore is it written but that wee might learne that we also are justified as hee was because wee have beleeved the same GOD and on Gal. 3.6 For what was he the worse for not being under the Law nothing at all for his faith was sufficient to him for righteousnesse All this we grant For as Abrahams faith laying hold on GOD as his reward in Christ by communion of his righteousnesse was sufficient to him for righteousnesse so is our faith also sufficient for us to iustification because by it wee possesse Christs righteousnesse Augustine on the 148 Psal. saith FOr by beleeving wee have found what the Iewes lost by not by unbeleeving for Abraham beleeved GOD and it was imputed to him for righteousnesse and on Psal. 140. for I beleeve in him who justifieth the ungodly that my faith may be imputed to mee for righteousnes and in his book de natura gratia For if Christ dyed not in vaine the ungodly is justified in him alone to whom beleeving in him that justifieth the ungodly faith is accounted to him for righteousnesse and in his 68. sermon de tempore Abraham beleeved GOD and it was imputed to him for righteousnesse See that without any worke hee is iustified by faith and whatsoever was possible to be conferred on him by his observation of the Law his beleeving alone gave it all unto him where note that beleeving gives righteousnes and is not the righteousnes given in iustification Primasius on Rom. 43. saith ABrahams faith by the guift of GOD was so great that both his former sinnes were forgiven and this faith alone is said to be accepted before all righteousnes that is before all righteousnes of his owne not instead of Christs righteousnes For if it had not laid hold and possessed the full satisfaction of Christ it could not have gotten pardon of his sinnes Beda's words which he citeth concerning the faith which is imputed are onely these not every faith but that onely which worketh by love This is a certaine truth for no faith can bring to us a true sense and assurance of our communion with Christ but that which worketh by love Haymo on Rom. 43 saith Quia credidit Deo c. Because hee beleeved GOD it was imputed to him for righteousnesse
are not to seeke righteousnes by our owne workes but by faith in Christ for if wee can obtaine grace to believe in him and to lay hold on his righteousnesse wee are for Christ and his righteousnesse sake upon our believing counted righteous before GOD because by our communion which wee have with Christ by the Spirit dwelling in us and enabling us to believe The righteousnesse of the Law is fulfilled in us imputatively by the righteousnesse of another even of Christ which is also ours for we are flesh of his flesh that is one with him these are Musculus his owne words in which hee roundly expresseth himselfe in Rom. 8.4 and 10.3.4 Luthers words at which hee catcheth in vaine are to the same purpose in Gal. 3.6 GOD for Christs sake accounts this imperfect faith for perfect righteousnesse Here Luther doth not charge GOD with error or iniquity in judgement by judgeing and accounting that for perfect righteousnesse which is imperfect for his speech is tropicall imitating the phrase of the Apostle by imperfect faith hee meanes a true believer by a weak faith laying hold on Christs righteousnesse and by perfect righteousnesse a man set in a state of perfect righteousnesse by communion with Christ and this is the sense of the words that if a true believer doth lay hold on Christ by faith which in the best of us is but weake and imperfect yet GOD accounts him perfectly righteous with the righteousnesse of Christ which is most perfect and compleat Thus Luther expounds himselfe 1 Tom. pag 32. Editionis Ienensis Christ saith hee is in us by faith yea one with us but Christ is righteousnesse and a fulfiller of all GODS commaundements therefore wee also doe by him fulfill all GODS commandements when hee is by faith made ours And 2 Tom. pag. 515. Faith puts us upon Christs workes of righteousnesse without our owne workes and translates us out of the exile of our sinnes into the Kingdome of his righteousnes And Tom. 1. pag 106. By faith our sinnes are made no more our owne but Christs upon whom GOD hath laid the iniquities of us all and againe all Christs righteousnesse is made ours for he layeth his hand on us If a man had the tongue of men and Angels hee could not speake more fully for the communion and imputation of Christs righteousnes to believers for justification and of their sinnes to Christ for remission then Luther doth in these and divers other places as I shall more fully shew in the second Chapter As for Chamiers words who calles remission of sinnes the righteousnesse which is imputed to us they shew that faith is not that imputed righteousnesse for faith or believing is our act remission is GODS act who can forgive sinnes but GOD But indeed the meaning of Chamier is the same with Calvin to wit that our cleannesse from the guilt of sinne which is Passive remission or justification is that which GOD lookes upon in us when hee counts us righteous in Christ as I have before shewed wherefore I conclude with the contradictory of his conclusion which hee inferres upon the speeches of our Homilies and of other learned Authors to weet thus That wheresoever we find in the Scriptures or any Authors of sound learning this phrase of faith or believing imputed for righteousnesse we must not understand faith in a proper sense but the righteousnesse of Christ even his fulfilling of the Law for us which together with the power and merit of it so far as every believer hath need is communicated to him and imputed to him for justification For as a Merchant cannot be said to be enriched by the gaine of a commodity which never was his owne and in which hee never had any interest or propriety nor any man by an office which was never his owne nor by him executed So none can have the merit and benefit of Christs righteousnesse nor be said to bee thereby justified neither can any such thing be imputed to them except they have a propriety in it and communion of it Thus his instances and similitudes are turned against himselfe to the confusion of his haereticall opinion But that his sinne may appeare out of measure sinfull hee doth not content himselfe with his abusing wresting and perverting of the godly sayings of other Authors and using similitudes which are most contrary to his purpose but hee also layeth profane hands on the holy Scriptures That excellent saying Iob 33 26. which Master Perkins learnedly expounds to be meant of Christs righteousnesse which when men humbly seeke to GOD by repentance and faithfull prayers GOD renders unto them by renuing their sense and assurance of their communion with Christ in his whole satisfaction This Doctor novice most Popishly applyes to a mans owne righteousnesse and saith that GODS rendring to a man his righteousnesse is giving him the benefit of it not the righteousnesse it selfe And yet if wee should grant what hee perversely seekes it will availe him nothing for as the fruite and benefit which GOD renders to a man is not the fruit of a righteousnesse in which he hath no propriety or interest but is his righteousnesse so the fruite and benefit which we receive of Christs righteousnesse GOD renders to us when that righteousnesse is become ours in the propriety of it That place Ephes. 6.8 whatsoever good a man doth the same hee shall receive of the LORD it is for us and against himselfe for as the good which a man receives from GOD for well doing is the good fruite of his owne well doing so is the fruite and benefit which wee receive in our justification the fruite of Christs righteousnes made ours and imputed to us Those speeches Revel 13.10 and 15.10 here is the faith and patience of the Saints c. are not to be understood of the fruite and reward of their patience as the circumstances shew which are killing and slaying and leading into captivitie but of the patience and faith themselves that in such times they are seene tride and proved and GOD at such times gives them patience and faith by threatning and foretelling the finall destruction of their enemies as learned Brightman truely expounds the wordes Besides if patience and faith were here used to signifie the fruit and benefit of patience and faith yet he cannot say it is the fruit of any patience or faith but of the Saints themselves who receive the benefit Likewise if wee grant that in the other places Psal. 128.2 Labour signifies the fruit of labour and Heb. 9.28 Sin signifies the punishment of sinne and Gen. 19.15 iniquitie signifies the judgement of GOD on Sodom for iniquitie by a trope or Metonymie of the cause for the effect This proves that faith which is the hand or instrument of the soule receiving Christ with his righteousnes may by the same trope be used to signifie that state of righteousnes which we receive by it as by an hand or instrument Thus while he runs
his owne personall righteousnes as the justifier they are righteous by communion and imputation as justified And as the hands and feet and other inferior members live by the same life and are sensitive by the same sense which is originally in the heart and head of the same body yet they are not so lively and sensitive as the heart and head but in a competent measure and proportion fit for every one of them So it is in the mysticall body of Christ betweene him the head and them his believing and justified members as I have before touched So that here we have an intollerable calumny and slander laid upon GODS sacred truth and the true professors of the same Secondly he utters a notorious untruth when he saith that to bee righteous by the same righteousnes which Christ performed is nothing else but to be performers of every act of his obedience in our persons Thirdly it is a wicked error to thinke as hee doth that obedience and righteousnes ether performed by ourselves or communicated to us should make GOD countable to us that is bound to give us the greatest rewards For the righteousnes of justification and the holynes and obedience of sanctification are onely free gifts which GOD gives to make us capable of eternall life and fit to stand in his presence and to see and enjoy his glory not bands to tye himselfe and to make him countable to us for if we be righteous what give we to him or what receiveth he at our hands Iob 35.7 eternall life though by Christ purchased for us yet is the free gift of GOD in Christ. Rom. 6.23 Here therefore this sublimate Doctor doth bewray his owne ignorance in the maine mysteries of salvation and is as David saith Psal. 14. become filthy stinking and abominable in his thoughts and imaginations concerning GOD himselfe while hee doateth after Socinian subtilties and sets himselfe to be singular by preaching his fond errors and heresies Lastly after all this in conclusion hee takes upon him to elude and evacuate those most plaine testimonies of holy Scripture wherein Christ is sayd to cloath and cover us with the garments of salvation and the robe of his righteousnesse Isa 61.10 that our sinnes and staines being thereby covered Psal. 32.1 sinne might no more be imputed to us but we in the robes of his righteousnesse may stand cloathed as with long white linnen robes Revel 19.8 And like Iacob in the garments of the first borne yeelding a sweet smelling savour may be accepted of GOD our heavenly father First hee saith that GOD in the justification of sinners cloathes none with the letter of Christs righteousnesse but every man that believes with the Spirit of it that is not with the righteousnesse it self but with the fruite and benefit of it that is with faith counted for righteousnesse where note that in his conceipt the righteousnesse of a justified man is a thing inhaerent in himselfe and a worke performed in his owne person not communicated to him from another ab extra as garments are and so no cloathing here is one grosse absurdity like as if one should say a mans cloathes are not on him but in him That speech of Paul these hands have ministred to my necessitie Act 20.34 are nothing to the purpose for he doth not say his hands were his necessary meat and cloathes but by working did get him necessaries and so Christ by his obedience procured righteousnesse for us which he doth communicate to us and cloathes us with and by GOD it is imputed to us and this Calvin calles righteousnesse gotten by Christs death and resurrection and all this is for us and against himselfe The other instances which hee brings from Scripture to prove that Christs righteousnesse is by a metonymie of the cause for the effect used to signifie the fruite and effect of it in us prove no such thing at all The first of them Iohn 17.3 this is eternall life to know thee the onely true GOD c. It is mistaken for to know GOD and Christ that is to have experimentall knowledge of GOD and Christ and to enjoy GOD in Christ as the word know by an Hebraisme signifies is not there mentioned as the efficient cause of eternall life but as the thing wherein it doth formally consist So also that speech Iob 33 26. as Master Perkins truely expounds it doth not speake of the fruite of a mans righteousnesse which GOD renders to him but of the righteousnesse of Christ which GOD renders to a man a fresh and after temptation doubting and distresse makes him feele and enioy it in himselfe when by repentance and humble and faithfull prayer hee seekes it And although the nation of the Israelites are often as hee alledgeth called by the name of Jacob in Scripture because he was their Father and they his naturall progeny yet this proves onely that the Scripture useth tropes of speech many times which we acknowledge willingly and in the next Chapter will prove fully Where hee forgetting and contradicting himselfe utterly disclaimes tropes and figures and exclaimes against all the learned who hold that Saint Paul useth a trope in saying that faith is imputed for righteousnesse Well for the present wee will grant him that our cleannesse from the guilt of sinne and the state of righteous and justified persons wherein we stand before GOD being the issue and fruite of Christs satisfaction communicated to us may very well be called by a trope the righteousnesse of Christ but this doth not overthrow but rather strongly prove the communion and imputation of Christs righteousnes to us Thus we see how hee labours in the fire and in vaine beats his braines and out of the confusion and distemper of them doth say and gainsay affirme and deny the same things oftentimes being like a clowd without water carried about with winds sometimes one way and againe the contrary way and never settling upon solid truth nor building upon a sure foundation Now what he promiseth in the conclusion of this Chapter you shall see how hee performeth by my answer to his second Chapter wherein as he begins here so he goeth on entangling and beating himselfe forging and falsifying and in every passage discovering his ignorance and folly mingled with much impudency hereticall perversenesse and pravity which that it may better appeare and that we may see his Socinian heresie to the bottome clearely I will lay downe the chiefe heads of the Doctrine of Justification as it is taught in the Scriptures and maintained by all Orthodox Divines both ancient and moderne Justification taken in a full sense is that act of GOD by which he justifies his elect and faithfull in his son Iesus Christ by the communion of his spirit that is doth make them righteous by Christs perfect righteousnes and full satisfaction spiritually made theirs and doth count them righteous by imputing the same unto them and doth declare them to be righteous inwardly to
their owne consciences by the inward testimony of his spirit and the inward sense and experience of inward grace and outwardly in this life before men and publiquely in the last judgements by their good workes which are evidences of their faith and of their union and communion with Iesus Christ and of their regeneration by his spirit and adoption unto GOD in him First GOD the father is the primary efficient cause of our justification Rom. 3.26.30 and 4.5 and 8.33 Secondly the inward moving cause is GODS owne free grace favour and love Rom. 3.24 Tit. 3.7 The outward moving or impulsive cause is Christs mediation Isa 53.11 Iohn 1â— 21 1 John 2.2 The instrumentall cause is Christ the mediatour communicating his whole obedience to us when by the spirit which GOD sheds on us through him wee are made one body with him 1 Cor. 12.13 Tit. 3.6 The meanes by which wee come to bee justified are either principall viz. the lively operation of the spirit spirituall union with Christ the pure and holy humanity of Christ or lesse principall the word and ministery thereof the Sacraments faith and the like as appeares Rom. 3.25.28 and 10.14 Gal. 3.8 Heb. 9.14 1 Iohn 1. â— Dan. 12.3 The materiall cause that is the righteousnesse it selfe by which they are justified that is made counted and declared to be righteous is Christs perfect righteousnes obedience and satisfaction which he GOD and man performed in our nature in the state of humiliation Rom. 3.24.25 Rom. 5.19 and 8.4 The formall cause of justification is that communion between Christ and us and that reciprocall imputation of our sinnes to Christ and of his righteousnes and full satisfaction to us which communion ariseth and floweth from the spirit which GOD sheds on us through Christ which spirit dwelling in us in some measure so as he dwelleth in the man Christ from whom hee is derived to us doth make us one spirituall body with Christ and works in us faith and all holy graces affections by which we adhere and cleave to Christ and apply and inioy his righteousnes so that it is our formall righteousnes not inherently but imputatively and by spirituall communion for it is that which doth constitute and make us righteous Rom. 5.17 18 19. and 8.4 and â—0 4 and 2 Cor. 5.21 The immediate fruit and benefit of our iustification is the state of righteousnes and of cleanenesse from the guilt of sinne and acceptation with GOD Rom. 3.25 and 4.2 also peace with GOD Rom. 5.1 The end and use of our iustification is the satisfaction and declaration of GODS iustice in that he iustifieth us by the full satisfaction of Christ and not otherwise neither by it till he communicates it to us and makes it ours Also the manifestation of his mercy free grace and bounty in that he would give his sonne to become man and to make satisfaction to the full when no other could bee found able to satisfie for us neither could his iustice by any other meanes be satisfied also in that hee would give us his spirit to unite us to his sonne and to bring us to a true communion of his righteousnes and to worke faith in us by which we receive and enioy Christ with all his benefits Rom. 3.24.26 Tit. 3.4 Ephes. 1.6.12 The contrary Doctrine of Socinus and his faction THough they grant that GOD is the chiefe efficient cause and his free grace mercy and love the inward moving cause yet they erre in the impulsive and instrumentall cause and make Christ and his righteousnes no otherwise meritorious but by procuring that GOD should count faith in a proper sense for righteousnes to them that beleeve neither any other way an instrument of iustification but by bringing faith to this honour to be accepted for or in stead of righteousnes Secondly they deny all causality of Christs righteousnes in justification except onely by way of efficiency whereas indeed and in truth it is the matter about which justification is exercised for what is justification but the communicating of that righteousnes to men and the imputing of it and declaring of them to be thereby righteous the very name of justification signifies so much and what is the forme of a justified man as he is righteous but righteousnes to imagine a righteous and justified man without righteousnes is as if one should dreame of a living man without life or soule Thirdly they deny the principall ground of justification to wit spirituall union and communion with Christ which cannot stand without imputation of Christs righteousnes for communion and union doe necessarily bring with them imputation If wee have communion of Christs satisfaction and righteousnesse GOD must needs judge and count them to be ours for his judgement is according to truth And faith which is an inferiour and subordinate meanes they set up in the place of Christs righteousnes Fourthly as they deny the materiall cause of iustification by reiecting Christs righteousnes from being the proper matter about which it is exercised so also the forme or formall cause even the mutuall communion and reciprocall imputation of our sinnes to Christ and Christs satisfaction and righteousnes to us whereby it is made our formall righteousnes not inherently but spiritually and imputatively for they acknowledge no formality but inherency Fiftly they deny the immediate fruit and benefit of justification to wit that state of righteousnes cleannesse from the guilt of sinne and acceptation with GOD wherein the justified are firmely established before GOD and stand in his sight which is the chiefe honour and prerogative of GODS Saints and their greatest comfort in all their afflictions and temptations Lastly they take away the true end and use of justification to wit the revelation of GODS infinite justice mercy bounty and free grace for they overthrow his infinite justice while they teach that GOD by his soveraign power puts his justice to silence and without Christs full satisfaction made to it for us and made ours by communion and imputation doth accept our weake faith in stead of it and makes himselfe as countable for it in all rewardes as hee would doe for the perfect fulfilling of the Law by our selves or by Christ in our stead They extenuate and vilifie GODS mercy bounty and free grace by setting up faith in stead of Christs perfect righteousnes and making it the condition of the new covenant For whatsoever is given or promised to us upon a condition to be on our part performed is not a gift of free grace and bounty And when justice may bee turned out of doores without a compleat satisfaction there is nothing left for mercy wherein to shew the power of it The infinite mercy of GOD doth appeare in this that when his infinite iustice required that wee should all be damned without a full satisfaction which none could make but the sonne of GOD in our nature and that performed for us and made ours Hee would give his onely sonne
for us to satisfie in our stead and his holy spirit to unite us to his Sonne and to bring us to communion of his satisfaction Thus wee see that they shut up the doore of Heaven and stop that onely way to eternall life by overthrowing justification which is the making and accounting of men righteous by that onely righteousnes of Christ besides which there is not any other to be found sufficient and able to beare us out before GODS tribunall of justice Now let all true Christians well weigh and consider the difference betweene truth and errour life and death true Christianity and Antichristian infidelity for such is the damned Socinianisme before discovered And if any man in the midst of the light of the Gospell shining so clearely and discovering so plainely cursed heresie will be blind let him bee more blind still and if any will be filthie let them bee more filthie still And if any love not the LORD Jesus but hate and blaspheme his truth let him be Anathema Maranatha Amen THE SECOND CHAPTER OF Socinianisme Wherein the imputation of faith for righteousnesse in a proper sense is undertaken to be proved from the Scriptures and the interpretation of those Scriptures confirmed both by reason and authority as well of ancient as moderne Divines THE PREFACE WHat it is that should be imputed for righteousnesse in justification all the wisdome and learning under heaven is not so fit or able to determine as the holy Ghost speaking in the Scriptures being the great Secretary of heaven and privie to all the wayes and counsels of GOD and therefore there is none to him to take up any difference or to comprimise betweene the controverters about any subiect in Religion All the difficulty and question is because though hee speakes upon the house top yet hee interprets in the eare all the Christian world either knowes or readily may know what hee speakes in the Scripture But what his meaning and intent is in any thing he leaves unto men to debate and make out amongst them To some indeed hee reveales the secret of his counsell the Spirit of his letter in some particulars but because these are not marked in the forehead therefore their apprehensions and thoughts though the true begotten of the truth are yet in common esteeme but like other mens till some stamp or superscription of rationall authority be set upon them to make the difference yea many times the nearer the truth the further off from the approbation of many and sometimes even of those that are greatest pretenders to the truth The Answere THe first part or speech is a solid truth to wit that no wisdome and learning under heaven is so fit or able to determine what is imputed for righteousnes in justification as the holy Ghost speaking in the Scriptures But this truth he contradicts in the next words which follow immediately where he saith that the holy Ghost leaues his meaning and intent to men to debate which if it be true then men are to determine and to take up every difference about any subject in Religion This beginning with contradiction is very ominous and prodigious and from hence we may gather what we are likely to find in his ensuing discourse The rule by which men are to judge of the Spirits meaning is the stamp and superscription of rationall authority set upon them so hee here expressely affirmes and in this hee openly professeth himselfe to be of the faction of the Socinian and Arminian remonstrants who doe teach that the best judge of the meaning of the Scriptures is recta ratio that is their owne carnall reason rectified by the art of Sophistrie Againe hee affirmes that all the Christian world knowes or readily may know what the holy Ghost speaks in the Scripture If this be true then they are all taught of GOD and the Spirit leaues not his meaning to men to debate and to promise betweene controverters Here is another contradiction Hee proceeds yet further in his absurdities and tells us that the holy Ghost reveales not to all the Christian world but to some the secret of his counsell the Spirit of his letter this is a contradiction to that which went next before And whereas before hee saith that all the Christian world knowes what the holy Ghost speakes in Scripture that is all saving truth here hee saith that hee reveales the secret of his counsell but in some particulars thus in every thing he contradicts himselfe and like a lunatick broken out of Bedlam he raves first saying and affirming and immediately denying and gainesaying in the same things But yet a lunatick persons have high conceits of themselves that they are of noble and royall blood right heires to Crownes Kingdoms and Empires or if not the holy Ghost himselfe yet persons wonderfully illuminated and inspired by him And many times they will not utter their conceits in expresse words but tell you of such great persons and complaine of your blockish dulnesse and stupidity if you doe not presently discerne that they speake of themselves and they are the men So here doth this illuminated Doctor deale with us He tells us of some speciall ones to whom the Spirit interprets in the eare and reveales the secret of his councell the Spirit of his letter who are the true begotten of the truth and that hee takes himself to be a chiefe among these it appeares first by his undertaking to give a reason of the counsell and purpose of GOD in his former Chapter as I have there noted Secondly by his taking upon him here to determine this question which none but such illuminated ones can be able to do And hee breakes off his prologue with a kind of complaint and exprobration full of disdaine namely this that because they meaning himselfe and his fellowes are not marked in the forehead by the Spirit of illumination therefore their thoughts and apprehensions are yet in common esteeme like other men you see non sapit humanum nec est mortale quod optat till some stamp and superscription of rationall authority be set upon them to make the difference Here hee seemes in this last clause to take courage and to conceive some hope that by the rational authority of his new coined Logick of which he lately gave us a tast whē he told us that causes are opposit ex diametro therefore the efficient impulsive instrumentall materiall formall and finall causes of mans justification and salvation cannot all or the most of them concurre in one person Christ though GOD and man hee will make the difference knowne betweene his excellency and other mens ignobility and obscurity The last clause of his complaint wherewith hee concludes his Preface is an overthwart blow to some where speaking of those first begotten of the truth he saith yea many times the nearer the truth the further off from the approbation of many and sometimes even of those that are the greatest pretenders to the
which he beleeved to wit Christ promised for righteousnes and salvation was that which by GOD was upon Abrahams beleeving counted to him for righteousnes It was not his faith simply considered in it selfe but his faith embracing Christ promised and possessing him with his righteousnes and satisfaction which was reckned to him for righteousnes and as to him so to every one that beleeveth his faith is counted to him for righteousnes For all true beleevers who by faith lay hold on Christ the promised seed of Abraham and beleeve GOD to be their shield and exceeding great reward in him they are by one spirit baptised into one spirituall body with Christ united to him their spirituall head and made his lively members and sensible partakers of his perfect obedience righteousnes and full satisfaction for redemption remission of sinnes justification and perfect salvation and need not any more to seeke the reward of blessednes by the righteousnes of their owne workes performed according to the tenour of the Law by every man in his owne person but in the LORD Iesus Christ who is Iehovah Zid-kenu the LORD our righteousnes Ier. 23.6 and the end and fulfilling of the Law for righteousnes to every one that beleeveth Rom. 10.4 they have perfect righteousnes And in him GOD is become their reward and the lot and portion of their inheritance Psal. 16.5 And that gracious and free favour which GOD shewed to Abraham when hee beleeved in Christ promised and firmely without staggering applyed to himselfe the blessing promised being fully perswaded that GOD who of his free grace promised was by his power able to performe though by the course of nature and by reason of the deadnesse of Sara's wombe he himselfe seemed to bee and indeed was uncapable of that blessing The same hee will shew to all true beleevers who are Abrahams faithfull seed and children of promise that is as hee reckoned Abrahams faith for righteousnes so hee will count their faith to them for righteousnes that is he will accept and account them for righteous persons as indeed they are not for any workes of their owne nor by any righteousnesse performed according to the letter of the law in their owne persons but by the righteousnes which is through the faith of Christ and is called the righteousnes of faith because it is the righteousnes of Christ GOD and man given to them of GOD and of them apprehended and applyed by faith For being thus justified by faith and having communion with Christ of his full satisfaction and righteousnes GOD whose judgement is according to truth doth certainely judge and count them as truly they are righteous in his sight becomes in Christ their shield and exceeding great reward This is the Orthodox exposition of the Apostles wordes in this Chapter generally received by all both ancient and moderne Divines famous for learning and godlinesse The corrupt and hereticall exposition of the Apostles words made by Socinus and maintained by his followers the Arminians and other fanaticall Sectaries THey of the Socinian faction doe generally hold and obstinately affirme that Abrahams beleeving and his faith taken in a proper literall sense without any trope is here said by the Apostle to be counted to Abraham for righteousnes in stead of all righteousnes which either Abraham himselfe was by the Law bound to performe in his owne person or any surety could performe for him And in like manner to every one that beleeveth his faith is in a proper sense said to bee counted for righteousnes even his faith by it selfe and not the righteousnes of Christ with it This is their exposition And upon these wordes of the Apostle thus falsly and corruptly interpreted they build all their hereticall opinions and doctrines concerning justification of the faithfull before GOD namely these following First that faith as it is in every beleever even as it is inherent in him and is his owne faith and beleeving is the onely thing which GOD of his grace and mercy and out of his absolute soveraigne power and dominion is pleased to ordaine appoint and account for all the righteousnes which a man shall have for his justification though in truth and according to Law and the rule of justice it is not righteousnes being weak oftentimes and full of imperfections Secondly that the Spirit of GOD in these wordes of the Apostle did not intend or meane any communion of the righteousnes and perfect obedience performed by Christ to the Law as our surety and in our stead nor imputation of that righteousnes to every true beleever for justification nor GODS accepting of the faithfull for righteous by that righteousnes communicated to them and of them applyed possessed and enjoyed by faith By faith and believing they do not understand that applying faith which is a gift and worke of GODS Spirit in the elect regenerate and sanctified by which they do believe and are perswaded that they are in Christ and Christ is their head and they as lively members of his mysticall body have communion of all his benefits even of his full satisfaction and perfect righteousnes for justification and full remission of all their sinnes But by faith and believing they understand onely a confidence in GOD that hee will performe his promises made in Christ and an assent unto his word that it is true The tenour of which word and promises they conceive to be this That Christ in his pure unspotted humane nature hath by his righteousnesse suffering and obedience unto death meritted such high favour with GOD that GOD in honour to him is pleased to accept and account the faith of them that believe in him and rest on him for their Saviour for perfect righteousnesse and requires no other righteousnesse to constitute and make them in any sort formally righteous in their justification When they acknowledge that the perfect righteousnesse and satisfaction of Christ is the meritorious cause of our justification they do not meane that they are communicated to us and so apprehended and possessed of us by faith that we are thereby indeed and in GODS account righteous before GOD and justified or that they deserve and are worthy that GOD should so account us for them But their mind and meaning is that Christ by his righteousnesse hath merited that GOD for his sake and in favour to him should account faith to us for righteousnesse without either our owne workes of the Law or Christs righteousnesse imputed to us and made ours by communion And when they say that faith is imputed for righteousnes as an instrument they doe not meane as the instrument or spirituall hand applying Christ his righteousnes to bee after a sort the formall righteousnesse of the believer but that faith as it is the instrument by which the believer doth believe that Christ hath purchased this favour that his believing should be the only thing accounted to him for righteousnes so onely and no other way GOD reckons to him
for righteousnes The orthodox exposition I will in the first place prove and confirme froÌ„ the words of the Apostle himself by other strong reasons afterward confute overthrow the Socinian hereticall exposition The true Exposition proved and confirmed FOr the right understanding of the Apostles wordes three things come first to be considered and explained 1. What is here meant by faith and believing 2. What righteousnes is here meant 3. What is meant by imputation First by faith in this text wee must not understand that naturall habit and power which is common to all reasonable men who upon their apprehension and knowledge of things spoken and promised do give willing assent unto them that they are true either for the authority of the speaker whom they doe respect and judge to bee faithfull or because they see good reason in the things spoken and promised And if the things spoken and promised bee such as tend to their owne good they rest upon them confidently and perswade themselvs that they are sure and certaine of them already or shall receive and enjoy them in due time without faile But here by faith we are to understand that supernaturall gift and grace of beleeving wrought in the elect regenerate by the spirit shed on them abundantly through Iesus Christ Tit. 3.6 which is therefore called most holy faith Iud. 20. verse This faith agreeth with the other in foure points First as that is an habit and power of beleeving so is this Secondly as that containes in it notitiaÌ„ in intellectu and assensum in voluntate that is both a notice and knowledge of the things spoken and beleeved and an assent of the will so doth this also Thirdly as that faith when it goeth no further then knowledge and assent is called hlstoricall so this also Fourthly as that faith when it reacheth to good things promised to our selves particularly to apply them and to rest on them hath also fiduciam in corde et affectionibus a trust and confidence of the heart and affections in it so hath this also and is called a firme perswasion trust and confidence But they differ in divers things First that is a naturall power or habit this is a spiritual wrought in men by the spirit of GOD dweling in them and uniting them to Christ in one mysticall body Secondly that hath in it no knowledge but naturall arising from light of naturall reason nor any assent of the will or confidence in the heart and affections but such as are drawne stirred up and wrought by meanes of naturall light and common causes This hath in it a spirituall knowledge arising from the spirit of GOD inlightning the understanding the spirit also inclines and moves the will to give assent and confirmes the heart with confidence and firme perswasion Thirdly that is common to all reasonable men This is proper to the elect regenerate and sanctified by the holy Ghost shed on them through Christ and is the first and as it were the radicall grace and vertue of renovation Fourthly that hath for the object or things beleeved either naturall and worldly things onely or things heavenly and supernaturall seene and discerned through the dimme mist of naturall reason and assented to and rested on with a carnall and unsanctified will and heart This hath for the object things supernaturall heavenly and spirituall discerned by supernaturall light assented to with an holy and sanctified will confirmed to the heart by a spirituall sense and sweet taste of the things promised wrought by the holy spirit in the true beleever apprehending and applying them But to come nearer to the text the believing which the Apostle speakes of in 3.9 and 22. verses is the faith and believing of Abraham who divers yeares before this act of believing which it here said to be counted to him for righteousnesse was called out of his owne country and by faith obeyed GOD calling and went and soiourned in the land promised to him and his seed as appeares Heb. 11.8 9. He had overcome and slaughtered foure mighty Kings and their victorious armies by faith and confidence in GODS promises And Melchizedek King of Salem the Priest of the most high GOD had blessed him as we read Gen. 14. And after these things the LORD appeared to him and sayd feare not Abraham I am thy shield and thy exceeding great reward and withall hee renued the promise of the blessed seed by meanes of which seed all the families of the earth should be blessed in Abraham and should become his faithfull Children besides his naturall seed and posterity which should come of the Son and heire of his owne bowels as appeares Gen. 15. verse 1.4 These were the promises which GOD made to Abraham and which Abraham believed to be true and resting upon the LORD by firme faith and beliefe for the performance of them the LORD counted it to him for righteousnesse Gen. 15.6 or as the Apostle expresseth the same sentence in the same sense though in words somewhat different it was counted to him for righteousnesse verse 3. even faith was reckoned to him for righteousnes verse 9. Now this faith was first an holy and spiritual beliefe and the faith of a man long before called of GOD sanctified by his Spirit and made obedient to GOD and his word Secondly it was a beliefe not onely of the promise of Christ the blessed seed in generall but more specially that Christ the blessed seed should according to the flesh come out of his owne bowels and that by Christ the Son of GOD made man of his seed the redemption both of him and of his faithfull seed all true believers should be wrought and performed GODS wrath appeased the Law fulfilled and justice satisfied and perfect righteousnes brought in for their justification and by his and their union with Christ by one spirit and communion of all his benefits they should have GOD for their portion and reward and for their shield and defence and should not need to seeke the blessing and reward from their owne workes or their righteousnesse and fulfilling of the Law in their owne persons but merely from the free grace of GOD and of his free gift in Christ as a reward of Christs righteousnesse freely given to them and of them apprehended by faith and believing Thirdly this faith of Abraham was not a weake but strong faith and beliefe without staggering even a full perswasion that GOD who quickeneth the dead and calleth those things which be not as if they were was able to make good and to performe what hee had promised yea it was a believing in hope against hope that GOD could out of a dead body and womb raise up a lively seed and make them spiriritually righteous which are by nature and according to the Law wicked sinners All these things are manifâ—st by the place before cited Gen 15. and by the expresse words of the Apostle in this Chapter from the tenth verse to the
one of his faithfull seed is here meant GODS setting of Christs righteousnes on every true beleevers skore and putting it on his account and judging counting and esteeming him no more guilty of sinne but perfectly righteous by that Evangelicall righteousnes which is called the righteousnes of GOD 2 Cor. 5.21 because GOD performed it in mans nature and the righteousnes of faith Rom. 4.13 and not of workes because it is applyed and enjoyed by faith Philip 3.9 For the confirmation of this exposition and iustifying of this truth wee need seeke no other arguments but such as may bee gathered from the Apostles owne words as in other of his Epistles so especially in this to the Romans argument 1 The first argument is drawne from the 2. Chapter of this Epistle v. 26. where this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it signifies to bee imputed or counted is first used by the Apostle in the very same phrase as here in this Chapter 4.3.5 9. If saith he the uncircumcision keep the righteousnes of the law shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision By uncircumcision in the first clause we must necessarily understand a Gentile uncircumcised as learned Beza in his notes observes and that by a trope of speech which is called Metonymia adjuncti for with some reason it may be supposed that an uncircumcised man may observe the precepts of righteousnes contained in the law but it is against common sense to suppose that the fore-skin of any mans flesh not cut off should performe the righteousnes of the Law no man in his right wits will father such a senseles meaning upon the learned Apostle The same word in the second clause as Beza also well observes cannot with any reason bee thought to signifie the foreskin of mans flesh not cut off that is uncircumcision in a proper sense for that cannot but most falsely be reputed and counted for circumcision because they are contradictories one to another But here by a trope or Metonymie called Metonymia signipro re signatâ the word uncircumcision signifies the state of Gētilisme Neither doth it signifie that state barely considered by it selfe but as comprehending in it the righteousnes of the Law which the uncircumcised man hath kept and performed in that state as the wordes necessarily imply for the Apostle doth not say that uncircumcision simply but uncircūcision which hath kept the righteousnes of the Law shall bee counted for circumcision So that here is a Metalepsis or double trope to wit first uncircumcision put for Gentilisme of which it is a signe or adjunct and secondly put not onely for that state of a Gentile but also for the righteousnesse of the Law kept by the man in that outward state of a Gentile uncircumcised which is a Metonymie of the subject containing for the thing contained Yea if wee looke thoroughly into the phrase wee shall see that the state of the man uncircumcised or the man in that estate put for that which hee hath done and performed even the righteousnes of the Law By circumcision we cannot with reason understand the outward cutting away of the foreskin of mans flesh neither taken literally and carnally as the corrupt blind Iewes did take it for a worke of righteousnesse and obedience to the Law for justification The Apostle affirmes Galatians 5.3 that so taken it was an obligation by which the circumcised was bound under paine of cutting off for ever to performe the whole Law And for a righteous Gentile to bee brought under this bondage was no benefit but a miserable condition an ill reward of his keeping the Law Neither can circumcision be here taken sacramentally as it was an outward signe and seale of the righteousnes of faith and of mortification and all vertues of holynesse by which men are sanctified to GOD and become his peculiar people For Ishmael Esau and all the Sonnes of Belial in Israel even Elies wicked Sons and the rest were partakers of the outward signe and sacrament of circumcsion and yet being destitute of the inward grace signified their circumcision was no reward to them but was a witnes to condemne them But the circumcision here mentioned by the Apostle is an honour benefit and a good condition and therefore undoubtedly signifies the inward circumcision of the heart in the Spirit and not in the letter so the Apostle doth expound himselfe verse 29. that is true mortification and sanctification The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shall be counted signifies here in a full sense judging counting approving accepting and using accordingly Now all laid together the meaning of the Apostle must necessarily be this without any contradiction That if a man uncercumcised do keep and observe with all holy endeavour the commandements of GODS Law and the righteousnesse thereof his state of Gentilisme and of outward uncircumcision comprehending in it a conscionable observing of GODS holy commandement shall be accounted and judged by GOD and by all who judge aright as it is indeed the state of mortification and sanctification which by the Prophets is called circumcising of our selves to the LORD and puting away the foreskin of our hearts Ier. 4.4 And this man though uncircumcised in the flesh and a Gentile in outward estate shall be counted of GOD for a true Israelite without guile circumcised with circumcision of the heart in the Spirit whose praise is not of men but of GOD. This sense and meaning of the words of this phrase is so cleare and manifest and so perfectly agreeable to all true reason that no man can deny it unlesse hee will set himselfe to rebell against the light And this phrase being the same with that which is made the ground of this dispute Rom. 4. where the same Apostle saith that faith and believing were counted to Abraham and so are to every true believer for righteousnes yea being the onely place in all this Epistle wherein the Apostle useth the phrase of imputing or counting except onely in this 4. Chap. and once in the 5. Chapter where hee saith sinne is not imputed it must needs give light to these speeches and words in controversie and as it hath the first place in this Epistle so it deserves to goe before as a guide to lead us to the understanding of the rest Wherefore if we will follow the Apostle himselfe and tread in the same steps after him being the surest guide and best expounder of his owne meaning we must by Abrahams believing by a Metalepsis or double trope with our learned Divines understand Abraham setled in the state of a true believer united by one Spirit unto GOD in Christ and having communion of his satisfaction and righteousnes which were of force and efficacy from the beginning to save justifie all the faithfull and to make GOD their reward And by faith imputed we must not understand faith by it selfe in a proper sense but the state and condition of a faithfull man and also that which faith
comprehends and includes in it even the perfect righteousnesse and full satisfaction of Christ GOD and man for there is a metalepsis or double trope as in the place before expounded By righteousnes we must understand the state of a man justified and made righteous by the communion of Evangelicall righteousnesse and by counting and imputing we must understand the accepting approving esteeming and judging of Abraham and every true believer to bee in the state of a man justified and GODS setting on his skore and imputing to him being faithfull the righteousnesse of Christ apprehended by faith which no man can truely by faith lay hold on untill by one spirit he be united to Christ and have communion with him Heare then the true sense and meaning of the speeches in question parallelled with the sentence and speech before expounded Chap. 2.26 which I thus lay down paraphrastically Abraham upon a true inward spirituall sense of his union and communion with Christ did believe and was surely perswaded that GOD was his reward and this beliefe and faith apprehending Christ and after a sort containning in it as by a fast holding and possessing hand of the soule Christs righteousnesse GOD counted it to him for righteousnes that is set it on his skore and reckoned to him for justification and judged esteemed and accepted him for a man truely righteous as indeed hee was by Evangelicall righteousnes And so whosoever doth not rest on his owne workes for justification nor seeketh thereby to be iustified but by faith feeling himselfe by nature ungodly fleeth to Christs righteousnesse and by faith feeles himselfe to have communion of it and holds it fast and applies and enioyes it His faith is to him an evidence of his righteousnes and GOD who iudgeth according to truth knowing him to have share in Christs righteousnes doth accept it for him and counts him righteous and useth him as a man truely iustified Thus you see how the Apostles former using of this phrase in the second Chapter doth shew the true meaning of it here where it seemes to be more doubtfull The summe of the argument reduced into a short syllogisme is this That exposition of a doubtfull phrase which is most agreeable to the manifest sense and meaning of the same phrase used by the same Author in the same discourse is the best Our exposition of the phrase in question to wit faith and believing is imputed for righteousnesse is most agreeable to the manifest sense of the same phrase of speech used by this same Apostle Cap. 2.26 in this same Epistle Therefore undoubtedly our exposition is best argument 2 Secondly wheresoever the Apostle useth the phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is of imputing one thing for another there the thing imputed differeth from that for which it is imputed and cannot in any proper sense be called the same as in the place before cited Rom. 2.26 Rom. 9.8 and so it is Psal 106.31 where Phineas his executing of judgement is said to bee counted to him for righteousnesse And wheresoever a thing is said in a proper sense to be counted or imputed or set on ones skore it is said simply to be counted imputed set upon a mans account as Rom 4.4 where the reward is said to be counted of debt to him that worketh and verse 6. and 8. where GOD is said to impute righteousnes and not to impute sinne and verse 11. that righteousnes might be imputed unto them and Rom. 5.13 sinne is not imputed when there is no Law 2 Cor. 5.19 not imputing their trespasses to them 2. Tim. 4.16 I pray GOD it may not be laid to their charge or counted to them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Philem. 18. put that on my account Now here in the speeches controverted faith and believing are not said simply to be imputed to believers but to be imputed for righteousnes and therefore faith is not said to be imputed in a proper sense neither can it truely be counted or called righteousnes by it selfe and in a proper sense but the speech is tropicall and improper A third argument is drawne argument 3 from the Apostles words in the 4. verse where hee saith to him that worketh the reward is not reckoned of grace but of debt these words imply that the righteousnesse here said to be imputed brings the reward of blessednes to the believer which reward is of grace and not of debt Now there is nothing which can bring the reward of blessednesse in eternall life to him unto whom it is counted and set on his skore but the perfect righteousnesse and satisfaction of Iesus Christ. That all do grant to be meritorious of eternall life to all that are partakers of it and because the communion and imputation of it is of GODS free grace and the faith by which we receive and apply it is GODS free gift therefore the reward of it to wit eternall life is of free grace and not of debt as the Apostle here saith whereupon the conclusion followes that the righteousnes which GOD accepts and imputes is properly the righteousnes of Christ apprehended by faith Fourthly the Apostle teacheth argument 4 expressely verse 6. and 7. that the thing imputed simply and properly by GOD is righteousnes and such a righteousnes as being imputed brings forgivenes of iniquity covers sinnes and so makes the believer blessed Now there is no righteousnes to be found among all mankind but Christs perfect righteousnes and satisfaction and that is a perfect propitiation for all sinnes and an expiation of all iniquity to them who by faith have put on Christ therefore it is the righteousnes which is imputed to every believer for justification Fiftly that which is said to be imputed to Abraham and to every true believer is righteousnes argument 5 to justification for the discourse of the Apostle both here and in the Chapters next going before that which next followeth is altogether of justifying as appeares Chap. 3.24 25.26 28 30. and Chap. 5.1 16 17 18 19. in all which places he names expressely justification justifying and here in this 4. Cap. he brings Abrahams example and Davids testimony to shew how we are justified Now there is nothing which doth serve to us for justification but that which is found in Christ our mediator even his righteousnes and perfect fulfilling of the Law so he plainely affirmes and teacheth Chap. 5 19. and 8 3 4. and 10.3 4. and therefore his righteousnes upon the true believing of Abraham and the faithfull is counted and imputed to them and set on their skore and they by it are justified argument 6 Lastly as the imputing of any thing for righteousnes is to be taken in other places of Scripture wheresoever it is mentioned so undoubtedly it is here to be taken For the Scripture is the best expounder of it selfe and the spirit of God therein speaking doth best understand shew his own meaning Now the onely place in all
most part at this day Answere IN this third argument he undertakes to prove that if faith were said to be imputed by a trope or metonymie and that by faith were meant the object of it yet Christs righteousnesse cannot be meant because the object of that faith which is said to be imputed is GOD himselfe or the promise of GOD But to understand that by GOD is meant Christs righteousnes would be not a trope or figure of speech but a monster of speech To which I answere that Abrahams faith which was imputed was a believing that GOD in Christ was his shield and his exceeding great reward Gen. 15.1 Now no man can in believing by a true faith separate the righteousnes and full satisfaction of Christ GOD and man from Christ himselfe To beleeve GOD to be our reward is to believe that GOD is become our righteousnes and so our reward for the reward of blessednes is the reward of righteousnes and is called the Crowne of righteousnes 2. Tim. 4. So that the argument may be turned thus against himselfe Whosoever truely believes GOD to be his reward he believes that GOD is righteousnesse and so Christ as he is IEHOVAH his righteousnes Abraham when his faith was counted to him for righteousnesse believed that God was his reward Therefore hee believed that God was his righteousnes and so Christ as hee is IEHOVAH our righteousnes was the obiect of his justifying faith Secondly he hath here one most grosse and absurd speech which shewes either his palpable ignorance in Rhetorick or desperat impudency That is that if one should speak of believing God and meane believing Christs righteousnes this were not a trope or figure but a monster of speech Here I will intreat him to tell me ingenuously whether he doth hold the Lord Christ who appeared and spake to Abraham and the Fathers and whom they believed to be the true God If he denyeth him to be the true God then wee shall take him to be in all points of heresie a compleat Socinian if hee grants that Christ is God and his righteousnes performed in our nature is the righteousnes of God and inseparable from his person then hee who truely believes in Christ and enjoyes him must needs believe his righteousnes and enjoy it and to speak of believing in Christ God our shield and reward and to meane not his Godhead barely or his naked person but his righteousnes also and that he is IEHOVAH our righteousnes this is but a metonymie of the subject which non cane call a monster of speech but hee who is ignorant in the grounds of Rhetorick Thirdly in his denying that Christs righteousnes is the object of justifying faith he doth most openly contradict that which hee hath writ in the former Chapter in the 6 part where hee professeth that Christ and his righteousnes is the object of that faith which is imputed and if it doth not lay hold on Christ it is not capable of imputation His rehearsing of the variety of the objects of faith mentioned in the Scripture and denying Christs righteousnes to be any object or thing beleeved hee doth notoriously delude and gull his readers and shewes great impudency for what more often required in the Scripture to be beleeved then that Christ is our true sacrifice for sinne and our sacrifice of righteousnes and that he is the end and fulfilling of the Law for righteousnes to every one that beleeveth yea he gives himselfe the ly and by his owne argument overthrowes his conclusion For among the things which the Scriptures require that we should believe he reckons Christ himselfe and the doctrine of Christ and the promise of Christ the testimony which GOD hath given of his Son and the resurrection of Christ every one of which includes in it Christs righteousnes for if wee believe in Christ aright wee believe him to be the righteous servant of GOD in whom his soule delighteth who hath fulfilled all righteousnesse is the end of the Law for righteousnesse to every beleever and is Iehovah our righteousnes such a one he was promised to be The Gospel which is his doctrine teacheth him to be such a one The testimony which GOD hath given of him is that in him we have eternall life which is the crowne of righteousnes His resurrection is the evidence of his righteousnes and that the Law was fulfilled by him and death therefore could not hold him captive so that by rehearsing these as the objects of faith hee confuts himselfe and confirmes our doctrine And lastly he professeth vaine tergiversation openly by granting that Christs righteousnes is to be believed But whereas hee saith that Turkes and Iewes believe not Christ and yet believe his righteousnes this is a monster in speech sense and reason For how can a man beleeve that a person which is not is righteous and that righteousnes may subsist without a subject None can beleeve Christs righteousnes to be as the Scripture calles it the righteousnes of GOD unlesse he believe Christ to be GOD. Some Turks acknowledg Christ to have beene a Prophet but his perfect righteousnes performed to the whole Law for us they do not believe And the Iewes to this day blaspheme Christ and call him a lyar an Impostor a deceiver and malefactor justly crucified for his wickednes And therefore in this argument he sheweth that his tongue and pen are applied to ly and forge to contradict himselfe and to be constant in nothing but in holding obstinately his hereticall conclusions 4 Argument FOurthly that faith which is said to be imputed to Abraham for righteousnesse ver 3. is that faith by which he believed in God that quickeneth the dead and calleth the things which are not as if they were ver 17. But the righteousnesse of Christ can in no tollerable construction or congruity of speech be called that faith by which Abraham beleeved in God that quickeneth the dead Therefore the righteousnes of Christ is not that faith which is here said to be imputed for righteousnesse Answere I Answere first that a true believer may truely say my righteousnes which I have in Christ is this that I believe in God who quickneth the dead and graciously calleth and counteth me who am not righteous in my selfe nor by my owne righteousnes a righteous and justified person Secondly that God did not quicken and raise up Christ till he had perfectly fulfilled all righteousnesse and satisfied the law for us as our surety Neither doth hee quicken any dead but through his righteousnes and by his spirit communicating it to them the debtor or his surety layd up in prison cannot be released til the debt be fully discharged And therefore Christs righteousnes is comprehended by that faith which believeth in God who quickeneth the dead because quickning the dead necessarily presupposeth their communion of the righteousnes of Christ and under the name of that faith may by a metonimie be truely said to be imputed to justification
5 Argument FIftly the faith imputed to Abraham ver 3. is that faith wherein he is said not to be weak ver 19. and is opposed to doubting of the promise of God through unbeliefe ver 20. But the righteousnes of Christ cannot be conceived to be that wherein Abraham was not weak neither doth the righteousnes of Christ carry in it any opposition to doubting of the promise through unbeliefe being a thing of a differing kind and nature from it But betweene faith properly taken or a firme beleeving and doubting through unbeliefe there is a direct and perfect opposition And therefore it is faith in this sence and not the righteousnes of Christ which is said to bee imputed for righteousnesse Answer I Answer that though Christs righteousnesse bee a thing different from the beleevers faith yet when the beleever by a strong faith and without doubting possesseth Christ and his faith doth spiritually comprehend in it Christs righteousnesse then GOD counts it to him for righteousnes that is judgeth him a righteous man by communion of Christs righteousnesse but doth not iudge his faith and Christs righteousnes to be one the same very thing This argument is not to the matter It may bee turned against himselfe thus The more strong a man is in faith and farre from doubting of the promise through unbeliefe the more firmely he is united to Christ and the more full communion hee hath of Christs righteousnesse and with more reason may hee being so faithfull be counted righteous and Christs righteousnes under the name of faith be imputed to him This was Abrahams case he was strong in faith and doubted not and therefore having firme union with Christ and communion of all his benefits GOD justly imputed faith to him for righteousnesse and counted him so beleeving iustified and righteous by Christs righteousnesse and so in like case GOD will deale with other beleevers The sixt Argument SIxtly that faith which was imputed to Abraham was that by which he was assured that he who had promised was able also to doe it verse 21. and 22. But the righteousnesse of Christ is not capable of any such description as this that by it Abraham was fully assured c. Therefore it is not that which was imputed to Abraham Answer I Answer to this as to the former It is not to the matter untill he first prove that the name of one thing may not bee used by a Metonymie to expresse another except these two things be both one the same thing we wil deride such foolish arguments Though Christs righteousnesse be not one and the same thing with faith yet the more it doth assure us of the performance of GODS promise in Christ the more closely it comprehends Christs righteousnes and the more iust cause there is that under the name of faith Christs righteousnesse should be imputed by a Metonymie The seventh Argument SEventhly that which shall be imputed unto us for righteousnesse is said to be our beleeving in him that raised up Christ from the dead verse 24. But the righteousnesse of Christ is not our beleeving on him that raised Christ from the dead therefore it cannot be that that is said to bee imputed for righteousnesse unto us Answer THere is no faith under the name whereof Christs righteousnesse may so fitly bee expressed as that which is a beleeving on him who raised up Christ from the dead for we cannot truely beleeve GODS raising of Christ from death but withall wee must beleeve that GODS justice is by him our surety fully satisfied and his Law fulfilled in our behalfe and we being partakers thereof and enjoying it by faith GOD may justly impute this faith to us for righteousnesse Thus his arguments being all from his matter are easily turned upon himselfe 8 Argument EIghtly whereas the question or point of imputation in justification is handled onely in this passage of Scripture for those other places Gal. 3. and Iames 2. onely mention it but insist not at all upon any declaration or explication thereof it is no wayes probable but that the Apostle should speake somewhat distinctly and plainely of the nature of it otherwise hee might seeme rather to lay a stumbling block in our way then to have written any thing for our learning and comfort If wee take the word faith or beleeving so often used in this Chapter in the proper and plaine signification of it for that faith whereby a man beleeves in Christ then the tenour of the discourse is as cleere and full as may be the streame of the whole Chapter runnes limpid and untroubled but if wee bring in a tropicall and metonymicall signification and by faith will compell Paul to meane the righteousnesse of Christ we cloath the Sun with sackcloath and turne Pauls perspicuity into a greater obscurity then any light in the Scripture knoweth how to comfort or to relieve The word faith being a terme frequently used in Scripture is yet never found to signifie the righteousnesse of Christ the holy Ghost never putting this sword into that sheath neither is there any rule of Grammar or figure in Rethorick that knowes how to salve up the inconsistence of such an interpretation Answer THis argument is no more but his owne bare affirmation that it is probable the Apostle in this place where he handles the point of imputation would speak plainly and it is more plaine to speak of faith imputed in a proper sense the tropicall and metonymicall sense or interpretation brought in is a compelling of Paul to meane by faith the righteousnesse of Christ and thereby we cloath the sun with sackcloath in which multiplicity of words wee finde much vanity As for imputation in justification it is not the maine and principall point which the Apostle insists upon the maine and principall points of justification are in the 3. and 5. Chapter handled plainely and in the 8 9 and 10. Chapters where he plainely teacheth that the righteousnes by which wee are constituted and made righteous before GOD is Christs obedience and fulfilling of the Law The imputation of faith comes in onely by the way being occasioned by that testimony of Moses concerning Abraham which the Apostle brings to prove that iustification is not by our owne performance or workes of the Law but by a righteousnes which GOD gives even the fulfilling of the Law by Christ for our redemption which wee receive and enioy by faith so certainely that if we bee faithfull beleevers in Christ then are wee righteous euen in GODS account for true faith cannot be nor subsist in any who hath not communion of Christs righteousnesse This to all iudicious men is more plaine and limpid and cleere then to take faith in a proper sense and to set on it the Crowne of Christs righteousnesse especially seeing the Apostle in the 6. and 11. verses sheweth that the thing properly imputed is righteousnesse and therefore not faith which cannot properly be called or counted righteousnes yea he
tells us it is a propitiation to cover our sins which in no case can bee properly said of faith As for his words wherein he affirmes that there is more comfort in faith imputed then in the righteousnesse of Christ imputed they are most wicked and more hatefull then any poperie yea blasphemous in exalting mans faith into the royall Throne of Christs righteousnesse and calling the teaching of the imputation thereof the laying of a stumbling block in our way It is to be feared that he who thus speakes and writes hath stumbled at Christ the precious stone which GOD hath laid in his Zion as the Apostle intimates speaking of them who make the righteousnes of Christ a stumbling block and stone of offence Rom. 9.33 In the next place after these frivolous arguments hee takes upon him to answer some places of the Apostle which are produced by us and objected against him wherein faith and hope are used to signifie their obiects that is the things beleeved and hoped for as Gal. 1 22· and 3.23 and Colos. 1.5 And here he doth use notable trifling and most absurd tergiversation First hee grants the Apostle doth use in his writings such tropes of speech which is a thing so manifest that impudency it selfe is ashamed to deny it And by granting this he contradicts what hee hath before affirmed to wit that in all the Apostles writings such a trope is not to be found Secondly hee opposeth what before hee granted by a forged and false distinction affirming that the habit of faith may bee used to signifie the obiect but not the act Cujus contrarium est verissimum For in the places obiected the act as well as the habit and especially the act of faith and hope are to be understood for the habit is ordained to be exercised about the proper obiect but it never is exercised about it nor reacheth to it but by the act faith by believing comprehends Christ and his righteousnes and so doth hope by the acts of it reach that within the vaile And indeed if wee observe it we shall see in this discourse that faith which signifies the habit as well as believing which is the act is here said to be imputed for righteousnes as ver 5. and 9. and therefore this distinction helpes him nothing at all Thirdly hee contradicts himselfe againe and grants that the act may be used to expresse the object but then he flees to his old shift saying that Christs righteousnesse is not the object of justifying faith or of faith as justifying which error I have before confuted and indeed it is contrary to all reason for the proper object of faith as it is an instrument of justification is nothing else but righteousnes Fourthly he utters a notable untruth when he saith that the Scripture where it speakes of faith as justifying makes not the least mention of Christs righteousnes and fulfilling of the Law Let him read Rom. 3.24 and 10.4 and tell me whether the believing of the man to whom Christ is the end or fulfilling of the Law for righteousnes be not justifying faith when we are said to be justified by the redemption which is in Jesus Christ whether our beleeving of that our redemption be not a true justifying faith Lastly he argues without reason that though Christs righteousnes be a thing which is to be belived so is a partial object of faith yet it is not the object of justifying faith because creation of the world Christs being born of a virgin and his ascention are partiall objects and yet not of faith as it is justifying but either Christ himselfe or the promies of God concerning the redemption and salvation of the world by him To which I answere 1 that his sylogism is without mood or figure it is as if I should thus reason That Master Goodwin though he be a living creature yet because some living creatures as Asses and Apes are not reasonable creatures therefore he is not a reasonable creature 2. I must tell him there is but one true saving faith and that is iustifying faith and he who can by true holy faith beleeve aright the creation or the nativity of Christ borne of a virgin or his ascention he hath iustifying faith though when faith is acting about iustification the proper obiect is righteousnes even Christs full satisfaction for our redemption and salvation and the iustifying act is beleeving that Christ is made unto us of God righteousnes and we are made the righteousnes of God in him And faith imputed for righteousnes ver 3. is righteousnes imputed ver 6. and 11. Thus you see all circumstances in the context stand up in contestation with his exposition which by faith here said to be imputed understands faith in a proper sense and per se not faith in respect to Christs righteousnes But that I may not seeme to conceale any thing nor give any thing for his upon trust I will set downe these tergiversations in his owne words Socinianisme IF it be obiected that faith is sometimes put for the obiect of faith as Gal. 3.23 before faith came and Gal. 1.22 he preacheth the faith c. And may be so used with a good propriety of speech marke this bull that faith put for the obiect of it is a proper speech as hope is put for the thing hoped for which is an expression usuall in Scripture To this I answere first by concession it is true the name of the faculty is sometimes put for the obiect appropriated to it neither is there any hardnes or cause of offence or mistake in such an expression but it rather addes a grace and countenance to the sentence wherein it is used seasonably and with iudgement as might be exemplified by severall Scripture instances if it were pertinent But 2. by way of opposition I answer Here observe how he playes Jack a both sides First though the faculty bee sometimes put for the obiect yet the act is seldome or never to my remembrance the act or exercise of hope is never put for the things hoped for but hope it selfe is sometimes found in that signification as Col. 1.5 for the hope which is laid up in heaven so Tit. 2.13 looking for the blessed hope Now that which is here said to bee imputed to Abraham for righteousnesse was not the habit of his faith but Abraham beleeved GOD that is exercised or put forth an act of faith and it was imputed to him for righteousnesse Secondly though it should bee granted that as well the act as the habit or faculty may be sometimes put for the object yet when the act and object have beene named together and the act expressed and specified by an object proper to it and somewhat immediately ascribed to the act under that consideration all which is plainely seene in this clause Abraham beleeved GOD and it was imputed to him for righteousnesse in this case to conceive or to affirme that what is so ascribed
that is for remission of sinnes because by that very faith by which hee beleeved he was made righteous These wordes shew that faith by way of efficiency and as an instrument makes men righteous even as it brings remission of sinnes by applying Christs satisfaction to them Anselmes wordes are that hee beleeved so firmely this was by GOD counted to him for righteousnesse that is by this beliefe he was reputed righteous And I say there was good reason that he who by firme faith is partaker of Christs righteousnesse should bee reputed righteous before God These are his testimonies which he cites out of the Ancients whose maine streame as he boasted did so runne as to water his opinion But we see they so run as to overwhelme and wash away his muddie and slimie opinion and interpretation Not one syllable of faith in a proper sense counted for righteousnesse Thus the mountaines have travelled of a child and have roared out and have made a terrible sound and bustling and when it comes forth in the birth it is ridiculus mus nay not so much as a poore drowned Mouse in the eyes of judicious readers I proceed to his testimonies of moderne Divines LVther on Gal. 3.6 Christian righteousnes is an affiance or confident resting on the Son of GOD which confidence is imputed for righteousnes for Christs sake and a little after GOD counts that imperfect faith for perfect righteousnes for Christs sake in whom I have begun to believe We cannot desire plainer words to prove that faith is not the righteousnes by which we are justified nor so in a proper sense counted but propter Christum that is by reason of him which it possesseth with all his benefits and full satisfaction Bucers wordes are Abraham beleeved God he accounted this faith to him for righteousnes therefore saith he by beleeving he obtained this that God esteemed him for a righteous man These words shew that his faith was not his righteousnes but the thing by which he obtained the estimation of a righteous man Peter Martyrs words are To be imputed for righteousnes in another sense signifieth that by which we our selves are reckoned in the number of the righteous and this Paul atributs to faith onely marke the words hee doth not say that faith properly is our righteousnes but the onely thing by meanes of which we com to be reckoned in the number of the righteous Calvin on Rom 4.3 Abraham by beleeving doth embrace the grace offered to him that it might not be frustrate If this be imputed to him for righteousnes it followes that he is no other way righteous but because trusting in Gods goodnes he hath boldnes to hope for all other things from him And againe on verse 4. Faith is counted for righteousnes not because it brings from us any merit unto GOD but because it apprehends the goodnesse of GOD. These and such speeches of Calvin affirme no more but that faith is imputed for righteousnes not properly in it selfe nor for any merit or worth of it but meerely for that which it apprehendeth and embraceth when it is tendered That is GODS goodnes in giving Christ with all his benefits and righteousnes Musculus in his common places ss 5. This faith ought to be commended not in respect of any proper quality but in respect of Gods purpose by which he hath appointed that it to believers in Christ should for his sake be imputed in the place of righteousnes These words cut the throat of his interpretation for they tell us that faith is imputed for righteousnes not for it selfe or any proper quality in it but for Christs sake which is his righteousnes sake Also on Gal. 3.6 What did Abraham that should be imputed to him for righteousnes but onely this that hee believed GOD Indeed believing is the onely meanes to receive Christs righteousnes and therefore by beleeving onely we come to be counted righteous Also on Gen. 15. Hee so speakes of Abrahams faith that it is plaine hee disputes of that faith by which men do not simply believe GOD but believe in him That is trust onely in GOD and rely on the righteousnes of Christ God and man Again afterwards But when he firmely believed GOD promising that faith was imputed to him in the place of righteousnes that is he was reputed of God righteous for that faith and absolved from all his sinnes It is true it must be an holy faith and a firme beliefe which must so receive Christ and his righteousnes that it may be reputed to us for righteousnes and we may be reputed righteous and absolved from our sinnes Bullinger on Rom 4. Abraham committed himselfe to God and that very thing was imputed to him for righteousnes These wordes shew that faith in a proper sense is not imputed but our committing of our selves wholly to GOD by faith and relying on his righteousnes is that which is counted for righteousnes He addes also on Gal. 3.6 That same faith of Abraham by which hee beleeved on GOD was imputed for righteousnes And very well it might for by that he laid hold on GOD as his reward and his righteousnesse and shield Gualthers words on Rom. 4.4 are no more but the bare words of Moses Gen. 15.6 Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for righteousnes You see hee is put hard to it when hee cites the bare words themselves to prove his interpretation of them Aretius his words prove that faith is so acceptable to GOD that he counted Abraham righteous upon his believing by the righteousnesse of Christ imputed and set on his skore not inherent in him For thus his words run as he here cites them Rom. 4 He imputed righteousnes that is he so far accepted his faith as thereupon to account him righteous by a righteousnes which is imputative That is not by any righteousnes of faith or other workes or graces inherent in him but by Christs righteousnes which is imputative such as may be communicated spiritually and set on the beleevers account Also on verse 22. A faith so firme and pious was imputed to Abraham for righteous Hereby he notes that it must be a firme and godly faith which is accepted of GOD for no other but a firme and pious faith can possesse Christs righteousnes by reason of which it may be imputed to the believer for righteousnes Illyricus on Rom. 4.3 That same beleeving was imputed to him for righteousnes yea for true righteousnes These words shew that the righteousnes for which faith is said to be counted is true righteousnes that is onely the righteousnes of Christ onely for faith of it selfe is no true righteousnes The wordes cited afterwards are directly against himselfe That begging faith laying hold on Christs righteousnes was imputed to him in the place of his own inherent righteousnes It is not therefore faith per se proprio sensu but faith holding fast Christs righteousnes which is counted for righteousnes Pelican in Gen.
15.6 Hee simply believed GODS word and asked no signe of the LORD and hee did impute that very faith unto Abraham himselfe for righteousnes by which GOD is believed to be propense or ready for our good Hunius also saith The faith by which Abraham believed GOD promising was imputed to him for righteousnes Beza saith Here the busines is concerning that which was imputed to him namely his faith Inius and Tremellius on Gen. 15.6 GOD esteemed or counted him for righteous though wanting righteousnes and reckoned him to be in the state of righteousnes because by firme faith he embraced the promises Paraus Rom. 4.3 Wee understand by the word faith which is said to be imputed for righteousnes Abrahams resting not in himselfe or his owne merits but in the promise and good will of GOD. These testimonies are brought to begge the question for they onely affirme that faith is imputed and by believing men come to be counted righteous but there is not in any one the least intimation that faith is imputed in a proper sense but their owne words in the same places shew That faith by reason of that which it beleeveth and apprehendeth that is Christ with all his merits and benefits is counted for righteousnes which is our true genuine Orthodox exposition of the Apostles words And thus I have answered all whatsoever hee hath said for his interpretation onely his severall falshoods and manifest untruthes in severall phrases and boasting wordes prefixed before the testimonies of every Author whom he nameth I leave to the Reader to observe For indeed they are most palpable that every man of understanding may run and reade them But because I will not have such a forger and false suborner of witnesses escape away without the iust brands of forgery and notorious impudency I will bring in the best learned of the Ancients and also of late Orthodox Divines even those whom hee calls to witnesse for him and will make them speake in their owne wordes and testifie to all the world that by faith imputed for righteousnesse they understand not faith by it selfe in a proper sense but the satisfaction and righteousnesse of Iesus Christ GOD and man performed according to the Law in our nature and in our behalfe that through him the righteousnesse of the Law might be fulfilled in us who beleeve in him and are lead by his spirit First Iustin Martyr testifieth that we being in our selves transgressors and ungodly cannot possibly bee iustified but in the onely sonne of GOD now if onely by being in him and by that union and communion which all have with him who are in him then onely by his righteousnesse For as the same Author saith in the same place It is his righteousnes and nothing else which can cover our sinne Iustin Martyr in Epist ad Diognetum and in exposit◠fidei hee saith that Christ as well by his exact conversation of life that is his perfect righteousnes as by his undeserved death hath abolished and covered our falls and failing which came in by Adam Irenaeus is so strict for our communion with Christ in his obedience unto death and for our reconciliation and iustification therby that he imputes Christs obedience to us and saith Jn secundo Adamo reconciliati sumus obedientes usque ad mortem facti In the second Adam wee are reconciled being made obedient even unto death lib. 4. c. 14. adversus haereses Athanasius in his 2 Tom. pag. 270. of Cornelius edition saith that it is most necessary for us to beleeve the Scriptures that Christ who hath freed us from the curse is the first fruites of the masse of mankind who are by him redeemed and that the perfect fulfilling of the law by him the first fruites is imputed to the whole masse his wordes in greeke are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And in his booke de incarnat verbi hee affirmes that we shall live and bee saved because wee are partakers of the righteousnes without spot which Christ GOD in the flesh brought into the world Gregory Nyssen Orat. 2. in Cantica saith Christ having the filth or guilt of my sins transferred upon himselfe hath communicated his perfect purity to mee and made mee partaker of that beauty which is in himselfe Ambrose saith as Adam is the patterne of death because of sin so Christ is the patterne of life because of his righteousnesse in cap. 7. Lucae lib. 5. And our iustification by faith and not by workes he saith was prefigured by Jacobs getting of the blessing in sweet smelling garments Iacob was a type of every true beleever under the Gospell Rebecca of the Church The garments of the first borne Christs righteousnesse The Iewes of the elder testament like Esau sought righteousnesse by their owne workes and true beleevers put on the righteousnes of Christ by faith being so taught by the Church their mother and obtaine by the merit of it the blessing Ambrose lib. 2. c. 2 de Iacob vita beata CHrysostome saith If a Iew aske thee how can all the world be saved by the righteous doings of one Christ thou mayest answer him even as all the world is condemned by one Adams disobedience on Rom. 5. homil 10. And in his booke de recta fide It is absurd saith he to thinke that wee should bee made heires of the punishment of the first Adam by his disobedience and should not bee partakers of the righteousnesse of the second Adam who doth bring us to life by his most perfect obedience Theodoret Serm. 10. de curand Graec. affect saith It is very convenient that he who highly praised righteousnesse should in his comming in the flesh fulfill righteousnesse for men Augustine Enchirid. ad Laurent c. 41. saith he was made sin that we might be made righteousnes not our owne but GODS righteousnesse not in our selves but in him even as he was sinne not his owne sinne but ours not in himselfe but in us And serm 6. de verb. Apost he saith GOD the father made him sinne that wee might bee made the righteousnesse of GOD in him Behold here two things the righteousnesse of GOD not our own◠〈…〉 not in our selves Leo the 〈◊〉 Epist. 70 saith that by the innocency of one we are all made innocent and that by righteousnesse from him derived unto men who hath taken mans nature upon him Bernard Epist. 190. as one hath borne the sinnes of all so the satisfaction of one is imputed to all It was not one which forfeited and another which satisfied for the head and the body is one Christ. Also in serm ad Milites templi he saith Death is made to flee away in the death of Christ and Christs righteousnesse is imputed to us and a little after Hee who hath willingly beene incarnat willingly suffered and willingly crucified will hee keep back his righteousnesse from us and againe one man sinned and all are made guilty and shall the innocency of one Christ bee imputed onely to
fulfilling of the Law for our sakes Ibid. Artic 3. And concerning faith they teach that in justification before God it trusteth neither in contrition nor love nor any other vertues but in Christ alone it is the onely meane and instrument which receives the free grace of GOD the merit of Christ and remission of sinnes and resteth on Christs most perfect obedience by which hee fulfilled the Law for us which obedience is imputed to beleevers for righteousnes Ibid Artic. 3. Calvin is so zealous and so plaine and perspicuous in teaching and maintaining the doctrine of justification by the communion and imputation of Christs perfect obedience to the Law even his full satisfaction and righteousnes that among Christians who read Calvins institutions one would think the very Father of lyers the Divel himselfe should if not blush and be ashamed yet in policy and subtilty be afraid to call Calvin for a witnes on his side in this point least the most simple should see and discerne him for an open lyer and forger and abhorre and hisse him out with derision The Doctrine of Calvin concerning justification I will lay downe in certaine Articles gathered from his owne writings especially his Institutions Lib. 3. cap. 11. and 12. First hee affirmes in plaine wordes that justification consists in remission of sinnes and the imputation of Christs righteousnes cap 11. ss 2. As for the word remission of sinnes hee useth it two wayes somtimes in a large sense for that act of GOD by which he doth communicate and impute the full satisfaction of Christ unto his elect and faithfull so that the whole guilt of all sinnes both of commission and omission is thereby taken away and they are no more accounted nor appeare in his sight as sinners In this sense he calls remission of sinnes in his comment on Rom. totum justificationis and in his Instit. 3. cap. 11. sect 4 totam justificationem For indeed when the guilt of all sinnes of omission and commission are taken away by that part of Christs satisfaction imputed which is called his passive obedience or voluntary suffering of the penalties of the Law and the defects which come in by the sinnes of omission supplied by his active obedience in fulfilling the righteousnes which the Law requires which is the other part of Christs satisfaction imputed so that now the elect are reputed and esteemed as righteous men who have the defects which came by omission supplied and have no more the sinnes of commission or omission imputed the guilt being taken away this is perfect and whole justification and is very fitly called by the name of remission to distinguish it from justification by our own workes and by our owne inherent righteousnes But sometimes hee useth this word remission in a more strict sense for that part of GODS act of communicating and imputing Christs satisfaction which respects the passive obedience of Christ which takes away the guilt of sinnes committed but doth not supply the omission of righteousnesse and in this sense he makes remission of sinnes but a part of justification And GODS imputing of the active part of Christs satisfaction and counting the faithfull righteous by it imputed hee makes the other part of iustification in the wordes before cited Lib. 3. cap. 11. ss 2. Secondly he constantly teacheth and affirmeth that there is no righteousnesse by which a man can stand before GODS tribunall and bee accepted for righteous in his sight but onely the full satisfaction of Iesus Christ and his perfect righteousnesse which he GOD and man performed in our nature For that which is not intire and absolute and without all staine and spot of sinne such as never hath beene nor shall bee found in any meere man can never be accepted of GOD but is with him sleighted and vilified beyond all measure And whosoever prate of any righteousnes in mens owne workes or doings they have no true thought nor least sense of the justice of GOD but make a mock of it Instit. lib. 3. cap. 12. ss 1.3 and 11.16 Thirdly he affirmeth that man is justified by faith when hee is excluded from the righteousnesse of workes and by faith layeth hold on the righteousnesse of Christ with which hee being cloathed doth appeare in the sight of GOD not as a sinner but as a righteous man Instit. 3. cap. 11. ss 1. And the same chap. ss 11. This is that admirable way of justifying that being covered with Christs righteousnesse men doe not feare the iudgement of which they are worthy and while they deservedly condemne themselves they are reputed righteous without themselves Fourthly concerning the office of faith in iustification he teacheth that faith being in it selfe weake imperfect and of no dignity worth price or value is never able to iustifie us by it selfe but by bringing Christ unto us who is given to us of GOD for righteousnesse it is not our righteousnesse but it makes us come with the mouth of the soule wide opened that we may bee capable of Christ. And it is as a vessell or pot for as the pot full of money enricheth a man so faith filled with Christ and his righteousnes is said to iustifie us and to bee counted for righteousnesse It is a foolish thing to mingle our faith which is onely the instrument of receiving righteousnesse with Christ who is the materiall cause and both the Author and minister of this great benefit cap 11. ss 7. And againe ss 17. Faith is hereupon said to iustifie because it receiveth and embraceth righteousnesse offered in the Gospell Fiftly hee affirmeth that the righteousnesse by which beleevers are iustified and stand righteous before GOD is not in themselves but in Christ even his perfect obedience and righteousnesse communicated to them by imputation ss 23. Lastly hee sheweth how this righteousnesse comes to bee the righteousnesse of beleevers and to bee so communicated to them that GOD doth justly impute it to them for justification and accepteth it as if it were their owne to wit by meanes of their spirituall union and conjunction with Christ by which they are made partakers of Christ and with him and in him possesse al his riches Sect. 10.20.23 This is the summe of Calvins Doctrine concerning iustification briefly comprised and collected out of his wordes in the places before cited where the Reader may bee fully satisfied Beza in the doctrine of iustification by faith doth fully agree with Luther and Calvin in all the former articles First he saith that faith is not any such virtue as doth iustifie us in our selves before GOD for that is to set faith in the place of Christ who alone is our whole and perfect righteousnesse But faith iustifieth as it is the instrument which receiveth Christ and with him his righteousnesse that is most full perfection and we say that wee are iustified by faith onely because it embraceth Christ who doth iustifie us with whom it doth unite and couple us that wee may bee
partakers of him and all his goods which being imputed to us are sufficient that wee may bee absolved before GOD and deemed righteous Confess cap. 4. ss 7. in notes on Romans 3.22.24 Secondly that faith sends to Christ for perfect righteousnesse to justification and that it assures us of salvation through his righteousnesse alone because whatsoever is in Christ is imputed to us as if it were our owne if so bee wee embrace him by faith The righteousnesse of Christ which is imputed hee describeth to bee the greatest and most absolute perfection of righteousnesse consisting in these two things First that he hath no sinne in him Secondly that hee hath fulfilled all the righteousnesse of the Law confess cap. 4 ss 8. in his notes on Rom 3.22.26 and Rom. 4.5 and 5.12 and Phil. 3.9 Thirdly hee sheweth that wee come to have communion of Christs righteousnesse by spirituall union and mariage with Christ. If saith he wee bee united and ioyned together into fellowship with Christ by faith nothing is more properly ours then Christ and whatsoever is Christs confess 4. ss 9. Fourthly hee pronounceth that it is no lesse then wicked blasphemie to denie the mutuall and reciprocall imputation of the sinnes of beleevers to Christ and of Christs perfect satisfaction to beleevers Lib. contra Anonymum de justificatione Fiftly hee affirmes that righteousnesse which iustifieth men before GOD must bee both a full satisfaction for sinne and also a perfect fulfilling of GODS commandements in every part on Rom 3.20 Our learned Whitakers in his answere to Campions 8th reason pagâ—8 â—8 and in the 8 Book against Duraeus pag 177.182 183. doth pithily dispute and stoutly maintaine the Doctrine of the righteousnes of Christ imputed which he proves to be the onely perfect righteousnes able to justifie us before GOD. Master Perkins also in his Golden Chaine Chap. 37. makes the translation of the beleevers sinnes to Christ and Christs righteousnes to the beleever by a mutuall reciprocall imputation the very forme of iustification Polanus in Syntagmate Theolog l. 6 c. 36. doth maintain the same dâ—ctrine with Luther Calvin MelaÌ„cthon Beza Whitakers proves every point fully by plain testimonies invincible argumeÌ„ts out of the holy Scriptures And in his Symphonia catholica he brings testimonies of the ancients affirming every article of our doctrine and in his Theses de iustifi hee shewes the consent of the most famous Orthodox Divines of the reformed religion since Luther As for Musculus and Junius whom hee brings as favourers of his errour with other later Dâ—vines let their owne writings speake and declare how wickedly hee doth abuse them in bringing their wordes to overthrow the imputation of Christs righteousnes Musculus on Rom. 8.4 expounds the Apostles wordes that the righteousnesse of the Law might be fulfilled in us to be meant first of all imputatively by the righteousnesse of another even of Christ which is also ours for wee are members of his body of his flesh and of his bones and Rom. 10.3.4 and by the righteousnesse which iustifieth beleevers hee understands Christs perfect righteousnesse imputed to us Also Iunius thes 35. and 36. doth affirme that the righteousnesse of faith imputed to beleevers is the righteousnesse which the Law requires performed by Christ differing onely in this that legall righteousnesse is every mans fulfilling of the Law in his owne person but this Evangelicall is the fulfilling of the Law by Christ GOD and man our surety and mediatour And for this Socinian hereticall opinion of faith imputed in a proper sense for righteousnesse in iustification No man can shew greater enmity against it nor with greater detestation oppose and condemne it then Paraeus in his commentary on the Romans and in other his workes Thus much for the vindicating of the best learned both Ancient writers and moderne Divines from the foule slanders most falsly belched out against them by this most impudent forger of false witnesses without any feare of GOD or shame of men And by their owne testimonies and plaine wordes rehearsed out of their owne writings I have made manifest their unanimous consent in the true Doctrine of iustification by the righteousnesse of Christ imputed to true beleevers and of them apprehended and applyed by faith Now I leave it to all indifferent readers and zealous Christians to consider whether it bee not their dutie both to take heed to themselves and also to admonish others that they have no fellowship with so openly profest Socinian sectaries as this man and his followers are you see the Doctrine which they maintaine is wicked and blasphemous heresie And after many admonitions given by grave learned Divines divers publick coÌ„fuatations censures often passed in publique against this errour they still persist in their pestilent heresie and are more mad to disperse it then before And when truth cannot help them they flee for aide to the father of lyars and make lyes their refuge and in forging lyes they sinne being condemned of themselves even against their knowledge and conscience as the Apostle foretold of heretikes Tit. 3.11 How wilfully against the known truth and his owne conscience this desperate man hath proclaimed Luther Calvin Beza Musculus Iunius and others to bee of his opinion I have sufficiently proved if ever he hath looked into the writings of any of them his own eyes have taught him how opposite they are to his heresie But it is no new and strange thing for heretikes to sin being condemned of themselves when they are once subverted The Apostle hath foretold us that we must expect no better from such in that place before named Tit. 3 11. Now in conclusion I appeale to all Christian readers and desire their opinion and judgement in the particulars following First whether I have not in all this answere declared and expressed what I meane by the righteousnesse of Christ which I have proved to be imputed to beleevers for justification If I have made manifest by plaine profession that by the righteousnes of Christ I understand his perfect fulfilling of the whole Law of God and performing whatsoever the Law requires of man for righteousnesse even a full satisfaction made in mans behalfe to the Law of justice Then I appeale to the judgement of all reasonable men whether my adversary hath not most wickedly belyed me in word and writing for he hath both wayes charged me that I neither hold Christs habituall holynes and uprightnes of his humane nature nor his active obedience to the whole Law or any righteousnes of workes by him performed nor both these together to be the righteousnes of Christ imputed and thereupon he clamours against me that I hold and teach a righteousnes of Christ which never was in Christ I confesse I have ever taught and held That neither the habituall nor actuall righteousnes of Christ alone nor both together without his satisfaction of justice by bearing our sinnes and suffering the punishments due to them are a sufficient ransome to redeeme us nor a compleat and perfect obedience and fulfilling of the whole able to justifie us in the sight of GOD and to reconcile us to him Now to affirme that all three together are imputed is not to deny the imputation of the two first though they that are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Calumniators may so wrest the words Secondly whether hee who hath beleeved and preached and in writing maintained for 28 yeares last passed to this houre what hee in this answere hath professed held and maintained can without wilfull lying and more then Jesuiticall forging be reported abroad confidently charged for a turnecoat whom this Adversary by this his Socinian learning and Sophistry hath so confounded and convinced him that hee is wholly turned to be of the same opinion and hath vowed to maintaine his Socinianisme both publikely and privatly to the utmost of his power So this mans followers have reported and have withall added that so many as have come within his breath are all illuminated by him and being converted to his opinion do rejoyce in the light by which he hath shined into their hearts Thirdly whether this Answer to his Socinianisme be such that both it and the Author of it have nothing in them but words and passion and that herein hee is strangely and monstrously metamorphosed from a Minister of Christ into an Angell of darknes besmearing the brightnes of his face with the foot and grease of Hell that the words and phrases of this answere are the black Princes coine and there is little in it besides cursing and rayling For many such fiery darts hath this Adversary throwne against the Answerer in a scurrilous Libel fraught with lies forgeries absurdities contradictions and blasphemies and sent forth under the name of a replie which is also confuted by the Answerer and the filthynesse thereof so plainely discovered that all true Christians and modest men will say of it that the reciting of it is a full confutation From all such wicked spirits the GOD of truth defend his Church and People and grant a free passage to his Gospel and to his faithfull Ministers a doore of utterance that they may preach among all men every where the unsearchable riches of Christ. To this GOD of truth let us consecrate our tongues and pens and resolve with both to maintaine his truth by his grace and the assistance of his Spirit so long as strength breath and life shall last And to him let us give all glory now and ever Amen FJNJS December 8. 1640. Jmprimatur THOMAS VVYKES Epistolica Collatio cum Bertio pag 1. 2. Lib. con Anonymum Wotton de Reconciliatione 1 Cor. 2.12 1 Part. 2 Part. 3. Part. 4. Part. Ans. Answer Answere Answere