to works As Galat. 5.6 I or in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision availeth any thing but saith that worketh by love or that is wrought and perfected by love For so it is best rendered and sometimes opposeth evangelical obedience alone to the works of the Law as Galat. 6.15 Circumcision is nothing nor Vncircumcision but a new Creature And in the 1st of Cor. 7.19 Circumcision is nothing sayes he and Vncircumcision is nothing but the keeping the commands of God where by the commands of God is meant the Law of the Gospel And Circumcision as 't is often in other places is put for the whole Law For whosoever was circumcised the Apostle declares he was obliged to the whole Law By which it plainly appears that whenever St. Paul speaketh against Works in the matter of Justification 't is the works of the Law and not of the Gospel that he intends and so he is to be understood For by the works of the Gospel we come to have a right and title to Justification and Salvation as appears Rev. 22.14 Blessed are they that do his commandments that they may have right to the tree of life That Gospel Works are never excluded but are equally interested with faith in the matter of Justification will appear true beyond any good denyal by these two considerations First That faith that is said to justifie and does only so is a faith that worketh by love which is in other words to say 't is a faith that worketh by a sincere obedience and keeping all the Commands of God Secondly the promises of the Gospel are as well made and the rewards thereof equally annexed to our Gospel obedience as they are to our faith which plainly shews that faith and obedience are inseparably conjoyn'd in this matter and that faith is alwayes so to be understood as comprehensive thereof without it 't is dead is but a Karkass of faith and not such a living faith as the Gospel intends when it speaks of a justifying faith SECT IV. I Proceed to the third and last inquiry which is this How do we come to partake of the benefits of Justification before God and arrive at a justified estate To this the Scripture gives us a plain and ready Answer By peforming the Gospel-Condition For all the advantages that accrue to the world from Christs satisfaction are proposed conditionally to us and no man is actually justified till the condition be performed For whom he called them he justified And upon that account it is that we read in the New Testament of being justified by our faith of being justified by our words and works Gospel-faith and obedience being the condition required on our part to be performed and upon the performance of which we are justified and come to give up our account with joy at the great Judgement day men will be justified and condemned upon their performing or not performing the Gospel condition as we find by our Saviours own words Mat. 25. v. 35. That the Covenant of Grace is in the proposal of it conditional and that Christ with all his saving benefits is by the Gospel offered to us upon terms that we stand obliged personally to perform there needs no other proof then our Saviours own summary words about that matter He that believes shall be saved he that believes not shall be damned And we find Gen. 17. v. 1. When God first proposed the Covenant of Grace to Abraham he annexed sincere obedience to it as the condition of it Walk before me and be thou upright and I will make a Covenant with thee Nor do we find our Saviour ever encouraging any to come to him but upon the termes of taking his yoke and bearing his burden And indeed the Gospel is every where so express in this point and so very many Texts do affirm it that no man but one extreamly intoxicated with the phrenzy of Antinomianism can deny it and it were labour lost to prove it Now in regard the whole Conditionality of the Gospel is comprised in believing and in that one word Faith upon which account we are so often said to be justified by faith 'T is of great concern to arrive at the Scripture sense of this word and its intendment by it And to me it appears very evident That to be justified by faith in Scripture is generally taken to be Justified upon the terms of Christianity and the principles of the Gospel in opposition to Legal and Jewish Justification And by faith is comprehended whatever the Gospel requires of us in order to Justification The Gospel is stiled the Law of faith and whatever is required of us by it is called the obedience of faith Two Extreams are with great caution to be avoided in our conceptions of Gospel-faith First We must not on the one hand imagine that by faith and believing is meant only in the Gospel a bare Crediting of God and giving our assent to the Revelation of Jesus Christ and acquieseng therein For to be a Believer and to be a sincere practical Christian is all one in Scripture sense and When we are told that He that believeth shall be saved and are told in many other places by our Saviour and the Apostles that 't is those only that Obey him also and keep his commandments subduing their corrupt lusts and affections and working out their own salvation with fear and trembling that shall be saved and are generally told by the Gospel that without holiness no man shall see God 'T is a natural and necessary Inference that all that and whatever else is made conditionally necessary to a justified saving state and our continuance therein must be compriz'd in Faith and Believing Or else we shall make the Gospel not to be Correspondent with it self And indeed Faith is never spoke of in Scripture as bare believing and assenting in opposition to acting but as the grand principle of Action and so it is in it self The power of Belief is such that often it works physically and with great efficacy does it operate morally In the 11th to the Heb. the Apostle tells us All the great Actions of those noble Worthyes he mentions done before by faith God being not an object of sense since the world began Since Abels time the spring of all Religious and Godly actions has been faith But the world were never under the Law of faith till the Gospel was published That faith was nothing else and contained nothing farther then a bare Assent to the Revelation of the Gospel as true was that gross Delusion that led so many aside in the first publication of the Gospel Especiallly of St. Pauls Epistles For the Gnosticks and others unlearned and unstable as we find by Hegesyppus in Eusebius wrested the Scriptures and held That barely believing the truth of Christianity and professing it was enough without any thing farther done to save a man Against this it is That both St. John and St. James so fully
or in Judgement Not by infusing a habit for it is evident that both the Hebrew and the Greek Verbs from whence we must fetch the true sense of the Latin and English are Judicial and Forinsical words and arc scarce ever taken throughout the Bible to Juslify by making inherently Just or Just by Infusion The natural and primitive signification of them both is to justifie Legally and Judicially to make just by Plea and in Judgement And in that original sense or in a sense relative to it and derivative from it are the words generally taken in Scripture When either God is said to Justifie man or man is said to justifie God or one man is said to justifie another or one and the same man to justifie himself for all these wayes we read of Justification in Scripture 't is still without any signification of infusing righteousness or making just that way But that which is intended by the word is to make just defensatively declaratively judicially and not qualitively To give some instance of many Rom. 2. v. 13. Not the hearers of the Law but the doers of it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shall be justified That is pronounced and declared Just in judgment In the 11 Chap. of Job v. 2. Should a man full of talk be justified that is should he be defended and acquitted upon that account because he is full of words Shall that be a sufficient Plea for him So when we are told Pro. 17. v. 15. that To justifie the wicked is an abomination to the Lord 't is meant to justifie them by pleading for them and defending them or to justifie them in judgment while wicked For to justifie them in the other sense to make them inherently just and righteous is no abomination to the Lord but a thing he has every where declared himself to be well pleased with In the 8 of the Rom. St. Paul puts this question Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods Elect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is God that justifieth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Who shall condemn where by Gods justifying is meant his acquitting and clearing in judgment 'T is evident to be such a justifying as stands in opposition to charging and condemning Of the same import are the words most generally wheresoever we find them used by the Holy Ghost either in the Old or New Testament And this we have acknowledged by many of the Papists on the one hand and some of the Socinians on the other though both of them endeavour to prove that Gods justifying men is not his pronouncing them just and his declaring them so in a judicial way but his infusing of habits and making them in themselves actually and habitually righteous Justification in general may be considered as it may relate to two sorts of men First to righteous and innocent men and Secondly to Offenders Justification in both cases supposeth Charge and Accusation and stands in opposition to Condemnation A Righteous person when he is accused and found faultless that is inherently Righteous and Just he is by his righteousness made evident thereby justified that is declared and approved to be just acquitted and cleared both from accusation and condemnation David hath an expression to this purpose of God Psal the 51. That thou mightest be justified when thou speakest That is be justified by being manifested to be really righteous and just So Good men are sometimes said to be justified by their works that is defended and vindicated against false accusation and charge approved and declared to be just thereby A person so qualified is justified because he appears to be in himself righteous and just not righteous and just because justified Secondly an Offender when he is accused he can be no other way justified that is defended against accusation and acquitted in judgment but by pleading ample and proportionable satisfaction made for an offence and an acceptance of that satisfaction as such and procuring a remission of the offence thereupon 'T is not possible to contrive any other way of Justification in that Case For free and absolute remission of an offence cannot well be called Justification The more freely a man is pardoned without any sort of satisfaction the less he can be properly said to be justified Such a man now is not justified because he is found to be inherently just and without fault but he becomes Just is brought into the state of a just man because he arrives at a Legal Justification and upon satisfaction made obtains an acquitment in judgment Justification in scripture as 't is an act of God relating to Men is ever spoken of in this later way 'T is never meant to excuse or justifie a Sinner from being a sinner but to justifie a sinner supposing him a sinner to the utmost All Gospel-justification being founded upon Satisfaction as the grand fundamental of it But to come more nearly to the scripture-Scripture-sense and meaning of Justification by which we are generally told that all Sinners unpardoned are under Divine Wrath and stand Condemned at Gods Bar and that such whom God is pleased in the method of his Grace judicially to pardon and receive into favour he is thereby said to justifie To be justified therefore in Scripture sensee is to be Cleared and Discharged before the Tribunal of God from the Guilt of sin resulting from the breach of his Laws and Absolved from the Punishment due from Divine Justice thereunto This without any obscuring Speculation about the nature of Justification in general is that practical account we find the Scripture to give us of it suitable to its nature as it relates to sinful offending Man for it must still be remembred that Gods justifying in Scripture is his giving sentence with the Guilty party and so we can only be righteous because justified and justified by being pardoned and according to what it Operates and effects upon the subject by which also 't is best understood and becomes most accountable to every Capacity I include not herein the Cause of Justification nor the Condition of it but speak of it in its own proper form and simply in it self considered For had I so done I would after this manner have expressed my self Justification is an act of God whereby he does for the sake of Christs Satisfaction to his Justice upon mens sincere Beliefe of the Gospel account their faith for righteousness pardon their sins and Acquit them in Judgement That this Description I have given of Justification and our being justified is that which ought to be given and the direct account we have of it in Scripture will evidently appear from these four considerations Fist Sin being a transgression of Gods Law and so an Offence accountable for to Him nothing less can justify a sinner then the Supream judgement of God Himself as the Soveraign Lord and Judge of all the Earth The Apostle tells us that in few words It is God that justifies And He does it as an
is Davids blessedness of pardon Now 't were absurd to imagine that the Apostle should tell us that the Blessedness of Justification which must needs relate to the whole of it does consist in imputing righteousness without works which he makes to be all one with the pardon of sin and not imputing iniquity unless Justification were fully compriz'd therein and if it were so the form of it that it did as we say dare esse to it For nothing else can properly contain the Blessedness of it If it be meant by those that thus Object That by Pardon of sin the Scripture does not express the whole Effects that accrue by Justification That will be readily granted for our Pardon and Justification is but our Title in Law to the Grace and Glory of the Gospel is not the very things themselves though they are all virtually contain'd therein and inseparably conjoyned to it by the institution of God For Whom he justifies them he sanctifies and whom he sanctifies he glorifies And the Apostle in the 26 of the Acts conjoynes as inseparable forgiveness of sin and having an inheritance amongst them that are sanctified But if the meaning be That the whole form of a sinners Justification properly taken and as we find it spoken of in Scripture be not compriz'd in the Forgiveness of sin 't will appear to be a Mistake Those that thus Object tell us our Justification consists of two distinct parts First Remission of sin Secondly Adjudging to be Righteous Each standing upon a distinct bottom the first upon Christs passive obedience and the other upon his Active though in the Scripture we read not one Syllable of any such thing These two I have proved before are in the Scripture-method conjoyned Whoever is by God upon the belief of the Gospel for the sake of Christ judicially pardoned is thereby Justified and accounted as Righteous and the satisfaction of Christ is reckoned and imputed by God to all Believers in those effects and for those ends and purposes nor can it be rationally supposed to be otherwise imputed For no other persons Righteousness performed or Satisfaction made on my behalf can come to be any other way justly accounted mine then in the effects and advantages of it It can never be a Just Judgment to adjudge me to have Personally performed my self what was actually done by another though it was done on my behalf and be reckoned to my account There is no other possible way by which any man can come to be accounted Righteous in Judgment but either by a righteousness inherent in our selves which does constitute us innocent or by the Righteousness of Christ made ours in a way of personal imputation which must make us also to be justified as innocents and not as offenders The first is affirmed by the Papists and the later by many Learned Protestants The Overthrow of both which opinions I shall hereafter endeavour in this Discourse and thereby fully return Answer to this and all other Objections of this nature That Text Rom. 4. v. 25. is much pressed and insisted on But upon great Mistake as will easily be made to appear The words are Who was delivered for our offences and was raised again for our Justification Which words are not to be taken as if there were two distinct ends in Christs Death and Resurrection the one to obtain pardon of sin and the other to justifie And so to divide between them two whereas in truth the Apostle makes them one and the same thing But the natural meaning and intendment of the Holy Ghost in that text is this That All that Christ did and suffered was upon our account He was delivered to death upon the account of our sins 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for our greatest sins and utmost Apostacy for that sense is included in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and rose again upon the same account to justify us from the condemning power of them By being delivered for our offences and rising again for our Justification the Apostle intends the same thing which is to justifie and save us from our sins And the latter expression is exegetical of the former 'T is to instruct us that Christs Death and Resurrection the whole that he transacted had one tendency and was all in order to one and the same end For in some Texts we are said to be justified by his Death and by his Blood so that he Dyed for our justification as well as rose again for it The Scripture no where affords us the least warrant to assign one distinct end to Christs death and another to his resurrection Nay the Apostle himself upon another occasion Rom. 14. ver 9. positively conjoyns them as inseparable in their ends For this end says he Christ both dyed and rose again Whatever Christ dyed for he rose again for His Rising again did not induce any farther or other ends then were his Death but only compleat and perfect the whole Design and Intendment thereof For although Christ dyed for our sins yet if he had not Risen again we could not have reap't the Fruit and Effect of his Death His own Justification as Mediator and so ours depending upon his Resurrection as the supream and Glorious Effect of his Deity and that whereby he was declared to be the Son of God mightily from heaven Secondly 'T is Objected That Remission of sin doth only take away the guilt or ordination to punishment but doth not remove the Sin it self and therefore Justification cannot consist in it Although pardon of sin do make as if sin had never been in respect of the guilt of it yet not in respect of the denomination of the Subject Although David was pardoned yet his pardon did not make him a Just man in those acts of his Murder and Adultery He was truely a Murderer and an Adulterer notwithstanding Justification doth not denominate a man to be Just and a righteousness is requisite unto it A man is not Justified and therefore Just but must be Just and therefore Justified in the order of Justification To this I Answer in these three things First by Gods forgiving of sin in a Judicial way as much is done to obliterate and extinguish it in its proper denomination as is possible and nothing but Gods forgiveness could have done so much For he forgiveth as the Supream Soveraign and Lord of all And his forgiveness is not only the effect of his mercy but the result of all his infinite Attributes He is pleased with a redundancy of Grace to express himself in Scripture to us about this matter that we might have a strong consolation therein As first That he will turn his face from our sins Psal 51. Secondly That he will remember them no more Isa 42. Thirdly That he will not impute them Psal 32. Fourthly That he will cast them into the depths of the sea Mica 7. And fifthly that he will cast them behind his back Isa 38. Now I say
Where God hath so forgiven sin all the effects and consequences of it as such an Action are utterly extinguished and so it self ceaseth after a sort to be And he that hath committed Acts of sin when he is Legally pardoned is no more a Sinner nor ought he in Justice so to be accounted For 't was the judgment of the Law by which he is Acquitted that â—â—â—de him so to be 'T is true those sinful Acts do not naturally cease to be but all that was in those Acts obnoxious to the Law from whence their sinfulness arose upon Judicial pardon legally ceaseth to be and that is sufficient in this case For we are not in the discourse of this point making inquiries into a natural or metaphysical existence of things but only into a judicial and legal Secondly Let it be thus farther considered that nothing can more extinguish the denomination of sin and sinner then Legal and Judicial pardon As take it in the present instance of David in those sinful Acts of his The Acts 't is true were the same naturally considered after his pardon that they were before but legally and forensically considered they were not And how is it possible to be otherwise but that the very acts must be still naturally the same For suppose the righteousness of Christ to be personally imputed to David as those that thus Object would have it to be to denominate him a Righteous person and so render him a fit subject for Justification such Imputation will not make the Actions of his own sin to be naturally otherwise then indeed they are nor the Obliquity of them more cease to be then it does by Forgiveness There being no other possible way to bring an offender in the judgment of the Law into a righteous estate and condition but by Judicial pardon And if after such pardon what is here objected be true that the denomination of sin and sinner as such notwithstanding remain it will unavoidably follow by the strict Doctrine or personal imputation that a man may be under the proper denomination of a righteous man and a sinner at one and the same time which implyes a loud Contradiction For a man may be accounted righteous in respect of Christs righteousness personally made his own by imputation and yet he may be justly denominated a sinner however For although his sins be pardoned and cease to be in respect of the guilt of them yet not in respect of the denomination of the subject as 't is here Objected Whoever that was once an offender comes to be justly accounted righteous must first be fully cleared from the denomination of an offender for those two are visibly inconsistent in one subject And nothing else can more Effect that then forgiveness Thirdly To the latter part of the Objection That Justification doth denominate a man to be just and a righteousness is requisite to it A man is not justified and therefore just but just and therefore justified in the order of Justification I Answer The first thing affirmed herein That Justification doth denominate a man to be just and a righteousness is requisite to it is thus true That Justification necessarily supposeth a man to be just and it includeth the notion of his being so one of these two wayes either inherently or legally and judicially the one relates to an innocent persons Justification the other to an offenders And when justified they are both alike just in law-Law-sense though differently to be considered in the manner of their Justification and in their antecedent condition to it He that is not justified upon inherent righteousness but is an offender he can only arrive at the state of a just man by Legal acquitment in judgment and by having a sentence in law pass for him For whatever satisfaction he makes though it be true that there is virtually contained a righteousness in satisfaction yet being actually an offender in the judgment of the Law till the Plea of his satisfaction be accepted and he thereupon judicially acquitted he can never be accounted of as righteous and so can never be righteous previously to his Justification To speak of a previous righteousness properly so called requisite to an offenders Justification such as will justifie and defend him in Judgment has no tolerable sense in it For it supposeth a man to come under the notion of an offender and a righteous person at the same time This only is true in that case that a sufficient reason must be pleaded for the pardon and Justification of an offender before a righteous Tribunal And that alone can be plenary satisfaction and cannot be any thing else And that upon acceptance must needs produce Pardon And the natural End both of satisfaction and pardon is to re-instate an offender into a righteous condition The second thing affirmed That a man is not justified and therefore just but just and therefore justified is a great Mistake For it relates Justification solely and singly to innocents and renders the Justification of offenders about which the Scripture is only conversant utterly impracticable and impossible Persons inherently righteous are justified because found so and their Justification is but affirmative and declarative of such inherent righteousness But offenders are brought into the state of Just men upon legal pardon and discharge Nor can any Satisfaction in its nature operate farther Thirdly 'T is Objected That God requires a positive righteousness of us conformable unto his Law in the perfect obligation of it And therefore it follows that meer remission of sin under what distinction soever cannot be our righteousness Remission of sin frees from punishment but 't is perfect obedience that entitles us to eternal happiness To this I answer Legal sinless-righteousness which the Law requires God accepts satisfaction for in Christ 'T is Gospel-righteousness we are now to enquire after If God had not accepted Christ in our stead and his satisfaction to answer for all our obligements to the law as a Law of works and super-induced a better covenant thereupon this Argument had been good But seeing he has 't is of no force at all The Apostle tells us Rom. 10.4 that Christ is the end of the Law for righteousness to every one that believeth To understand which expression of the Apostle aright we must consider Finem alicujus rei as the School-men speak dici dupliciter in quem tendit res vel naturaliter vel ex ordinatione Agentis The End to which the Law naturally tended was such a particular personal sinless-righteousness in each man as he might justifie himself upon and claim the reward promised as a debt due This end the Jews pursued and sought after and the Apostle rejects as appears in the 3d ver But the end to which the Law tended by the ordination of God was Christs righteousness to make satisfaction for our disobedience and thereby to introduce another method of Justification in a way of saith and believing that we might no
Imprimatur H. London Justification Evangelical Or a Plain Impartial SCRIPTURE-Account OF GOD's Method in Justifying a SINNER Written by Sir CHARLES WOLSELEY Bart. Hosea 14.9 Who is wise and he shall understand these things prudent and he shall know them for the ways of the Lord are right and the just shall walk in them but the transgressors shall fall therein LONDON Printed for Nath. Ponder at the Peacock in the Poultry near Cornhill and in Chancery-lane near Fleetstreet 1677. THE PREFACE TO THE READER WHoever Treats upon this Weighty and most Important Subject of Justification I acknowledge ought to do it with great Caution with great Humility and with great Sincerity First with great Caution for 't is a point about which not only the best Learn'd but the most Holy and most Sincerely Religious have considerably differ'd and in all such contests both Grace and Discretion will instruct a man not to rush in violently or suddenly to declare against any one side or yet easily to suppose the truth wholly appropriated to any one party But in every advance to proceed with Moderation and Circumspection Secondly with great Humility 't is not a sit Subject for Proud and Disdainfull Pens the thing in its own nature is of a stupendious and humbling Consideration and ought to be discoursed of accordingly that an Apostate creature in open Rebellion against the Great God should not only be forgiven by an Act of Soveraignty but that it should become a righteous thing with God to forgive him and that he should be Justified in his sight be brought to stand rectus in curia before his Tribunal and at the Bar of his infinite Justice and his discharge be an Act Judicial and as much the effect of Justice as Favour is that which nothing less then Divine Wisdom could have contrived or effected and when we duely reflect upon it we find no less cause for mortifying Adoration then humble Thanksgiving and Infinite for both Thirdly with great Integrity the supream interest of mankind their Eternal condition hereafter is so bound up herein and the true notion of this point so inseperably necessary to it that as men regard the souls of others or have any value for their own they ought with the utmost Sincerity when they discuss this point to design themselves intirely to the service of Truth and casting off all Byass of Interest and Party and all respect to the Pleasures of men Alone endeavour to arrive at a cleer and full Discovery of what God has revealed to us in his Word about this matter These Rules I proposed to my self when I first engaged in theste Meditations and I hope the Reader will find nothing in the following Discourse that will occasion him to think I have wilfully transgressed any of them Many Books I know there are extant upon this Subject but to deal freely with my Reader the consideration thereof has been so far from diverting the publication of this discourse that it has rather been the occasion of it 'T is apparent to all that are conversant herein how greatly this point has been obscur'd by multitude of words and I considared that many who want leasure or Inclination or happily Ability to travail far into Polemick Intricacies will yet think an hour or two not ill spent to read over a plain short Scripture account of this matter I will no farther attempt to pre-engage my Reader but only to assure him I have omitted no necessary diligence that I thought might capacitate me for this service I have carefully and Impartially perused what the Popish Doctors have urg'd in defence of their Doctrine and with what Exactness I could have considered over all the eminent Protestant Writers upon this Subject and although I highly value the Works of many of these latter both Dead and yet living and have learn't much from them yet I have purposely forborn to mention their Names for the same reason I find given by Grotius in the Preface to his Famous Annotations upon the Gospels Peperci autem plerumque recitandis nominibus quod ea videam factioso hoc saeculo magis ad oblimandum quam ad defaecandum judicium valere Should this endeavour succeed so well as to inform any that were before ignorant of this most essential part of Divinity or to unite any good men who have differently conceived hereof it will turn much to my satisfaction if any that are Judicious and Learned shall express their dislike of any part of this Discourse I shall upon all occasions endeavour by a just defence to render it more acceptable to them but if I find my self at any time attack'd by such as delight in Contention and love to turn all Polemick Discourses into impertinent Squabble I resolve not to be engaged by them nor upon any terms be brought to use the modern Expression serram reciprocare and indeed to all that sort of men that sullen answer before-hand may be proper enough and sufficient What I have Written I have Written ERRATA'S PAge 11 line 21 for By that read By Christ p. 15 l. 27 for prevailing r. Prevalency p. 29 l. 6. after were add not p. 32 l. 19. after were add in p. 48 l. 25 after saw add sit p. 51 l. 26 after that add be p. 52 l. 28 after high add what p. 54 l. 4 for require r. repaired p. 58 l. 9 after Believer add of p. 71 l. 23 for disobedience r. obedience p. 79 l. 16 after mentions add were p. 82 l. 23 after each add other p. 86 l. 22. after truth add of p. 86 l. 23 for imployes r. implyes p. 87 l. 2 after works add as p. 90 l. 28 for an r. any p. 99 l. 24 for principle r. principal p. 101 l. 12 after grace add the p. 104 l. 8 for pregnant r. regnant p. 107 l. 19 after go ad no p. 109 l. 9 for carefully r. fully p. 116 l. 26 for ake r. make p. 121 l. 10 after righteousness add imputed p. 129 l. 27 for men r. man JUSTIFICATION Evangelical IN discoursing the point of Justification these three things shall be first and chiefly considered First What is meant in Scripture by Justification Secondly What is the material procuring Cause of Justification before God Thirdly How do we come to partake of the benefits of Justification and arrive at a Justified state Not to obscure the meaning of the word Justification by nice Distinctions and hard and troublesom Terms The word Justification comes immediately from the Latine Justificare which is not a word of Ancient use amongst the best Latine Writers but is of a Later Edition has been introduced since by Divines to express the sense of the Greek Verb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so often used by the Septuagint in the Old Testament in rendering the Hebrew Verb Hitzdik and so often in the New Testament especially by St. Paul The meaning of it is to Justify and make Just by way of Vindication Defence
One being a voluntary act of Grace the other a necessary effect of Justice will not at all reach this case supposing it to be true For a sinners Justification results not from free and absolute Pardon nor consists in it but a sinner is pardoned and justified in a way judicial in pursuance of a Law by pleading an ample satisfaction made The greatest exercise of favour in such a case seems to lye in the acceptance of the satisfaction Now God who is the Party offended and the Judge declaring himself to be abundantly satisfied concerning the sins of the world by what Christ has suffered and done and it being perhaps highly requisite the Nature of Christs satisfaction considered in point of Justice too that he should so be the Pardon and Justification of a sinner are eminent effects of his Justice as well as of his Grace and Mercy And it becomes a Righteous thing now with God to pardon and justifie an offender so qualified in Judgement For it must be consider'd that although the Ground and Foundation of our Salvation and the whole of it in its contriving and effecting is nothing else but free and absolute grace and Divine goodness yet in such a Method and after such a Manner is Grace dispenced that in every Step that is taken toward the Salvation of a sinner God appears Righteous as well as Gracious and Justice and Mercy do kiss each other But still the Justification of such a one must exist in his Pardon by which he obtaines a Legal Discharge from all obligation to Punishment stands rectus in Curia no charge from the Law can be brought against him and he is upon even terms in the eye of the Law with those who never offended Nor can it be otherwise For no satisfaction be it never so Great can put an Offender out of need of forgiveness nor can it operate farther then to obtain forgiveness and so free him from condemnation and constitute him judicially righteous 'T is true that this is not such a Justification as an innocent person obtains in Judgment But 't is such a one as an offender is only capable of and has all in the effects and advantages that the other has and may be as truly and properly termed Justification And whoever denyes it makes the Justification of an offender utterly Impracticable and Impossible SECT II. ANd thus I have gone through the first Promise I obliged my self to which was to give an account of what is meant in Scripture by Justification We are not Justified as righteous and innocent persons by having Christs righteousness personally imputed to us as our own and we accounted in Judgment to have done what He did and acquitted as sinless thereupon Such apprehensions are vain and have no bottom in Scripture But we are Justified as in indeed and in truth we are as Sinners that is By pleading ample Satisfaction made for our sins in Christ and our own performance of that Gospel-condition which God has made necessary to our participation of the Benefits of it Upon which Plea God is graciously pleased judicially to pardon our sins to account of us as Righteous thereupon and to deal with us accordingly that is Legally to intitle us to all the grace and glory promised in the Gospel Divers Objections are raised against these Conceptions of Justification the value whereof seems to me to result rather from the Authors of them sundry Learned and Worthy men then from any weight in themselves The most Material are these three First It is Objected That when the Scripture describes Justification by Forgiveness of sin it speaks Synecdochically and expresseth the Whole by a Part. So in the 4th to the Rom. and other Texts And that Text Rom. 4. v. 25. is much insisted on to prove that Justification implyes more then Forgivenness of sin This Objection it will be acknowledged can be of no force unless it be proved that the Scripture does in other places ascribe some other distinct parts to Justification There can he but one more with any colour pretended and that is Adjudging Righteous upon the score of some righteousness Now it has been before proved That Pardoning of sin upon Christs satisfaction contains in it imputing righteousness without works and that in the Apostles sense they are all one When we are told in some Texts that we are justified by Christ in others That we obtain forgiveness of sin by Christ and in others That we are made righteous by Christ By an impartial comparing the Scripture with it selt it appears that one and the same thing is intended For whoever upon the performance of the Gospel-condition is legally Interested in Christs satisfaction and thereupon actually Pardoned is also thereby Justified and adjudged to be Righteous by the order and appointment of God in that case and in this the Scripture is every where very positive and plain That when the Scripture describes Justification by Forgiveness of sin it describes it Synecdochically expressing the whole by a part there is no good reason at all to believe but quite the contrary That it describes it comprehensively For it appears by Scripture-evidence that the whole form of Justification is compriz'd therein and the Scripture describes it most generally by pardon of sin and most fully in those places where it treats most largely and expressly of it In the forementioned 4th chap. to the Rom. 't will appear very plain to any impartial Reader That the Apostle there without any Synecdoche describes Justification in its full latitude if we consider these things First that he there fully and compleatly sets out the Justification of Abraham who in the manner of his Justification was to be the great pattern of Justification to all succeeding ages and the whole business of Gospel-Justification was compriz'd in the way and manner of his Justification Secondly he there states and determines the Grand and Deepest point about Justification whether it be by faith or works Now if he had not described it in its full extent and latitude and taken in the whole of Justification in that Quotation out of David by which he proves 't is not by works but by free forgiveness his Reasoning had not been Cogent For the Jews might well have replyed you speak but of one part of Justification and so conclude not about the whole That part indeed you prove to consist in the forgiveness of sin in the way of saith but it appears not but that there may be other parts also in Justification and they may result from works And so a man may be in part justified by free forgiveness and grace and in part by works Thirdly the Apostle very plainly makes the blessedness that David describes which in the blessedness of pardon and not imputing iniquity to be the blessedness of Justification For in the 9th ver Cometh this blessedness upon the circumcision only or upon the uncircumcision also that is the blessedness of Justification by faith which
then wrote And St. John tells us positively That he that Doth righteousness is only truely righteous And not he that reckons himself so without righteous Doing upon the score of believing And St. James expresly sets himself to confute this dangerous Errour and to prove these two things First That Christianity Believed and Professed will profit no man unless the Ends of it be pursued and prosecuted And secondly That that Faith that the Scripture calls a Justifying faith is an operative working faith a Faith that includes in its nature a suitable acting and obedience Speaking of Abrahams faith and his Justification which the Scripture makes to be the pattern of Gospel-faith and Justification and the one to run parallel with the other And which St. Paul had made so much use of to prove Justification by faith against the Jews Seest thou sayes he how faith wrought with his works and by works was faith made perfect and the Scripture was fulfilled which saith Abraham believed God and it was imputed to him for Righteousness Where 't is as plainly expressed as by words it can be That that faith that was accounted to Abraham for righteousness was such a faith as contained in the bowels of it a suitable obedience and subjection to all Gods revealed will and pleasure By works saith the Apostle faith was made perfect That is faith was in order to action and a suitable acting and obedience in pursuance of it was included in it and was that which when performed did compleat and perfect it and without which faith is altogether imperfect and is not such a faith as in the Scripture is said to be accounted for righteousness And therefore it was upon Abrahams suitable obedience in prosecution of his faith by which the Scripture was fulfilled when it sayes Araham believed God and that belief was accounted for righteousness By which it is plain that Abrahams faith was counted for righteousness with reference to that obedience that was virtually compriz'd in it and not otherwise And that his faith and his works wrought joyntly together to obtain the same end And this is no way contradicted by St. Paul who tells us that Abraham was not justified by works For the works that St. Paul means are plainly such as the Law required such perfect sinless works as would in strict rules of Justice make the reward to be Debt And therefore when he opposeth faith to works 't is but in other words to oppose the Gospel to the Law St. Pauls business is to prove Justification in the way of the Gospel against the Jews by faith in opposition to Justification by the works of the Law St. James his province is to prove that the faith that does justifie us under the Gospel is not a bare naked Assent but such a faith as Abrahams was that contains in it a suitable obedience The one Apostle asserts in opposition to the Jews Evangelical Justification against Legal under the general term faith The other Apostle for the confutation of Heretical Christians explains that term and tells us it imports not only believing of God but an obedient Acting in prosecution thereof That the Apostles do very well agree with each in their Doctrine that Abraham was justified by such a faith as was accompanied with works and not by faith only according to St. James And yet that Abraham was justified by faith and not by works according to St. Paul may be this made to appear First That Abrahams faith that was counted for righteousness included his suitable obedience according to St. James and that his works did compleat and perfect his faith And that the Scripture was thereby fulfilled that tells us the Act of his Believing was counted for righteousness is plain from the story it self in Genesis which St. James quotes Had not his Believing compriz d a suitable obedience instead of being counted for Righteousness it would no doubt have been esteemed of God as it had indeed been a great piece of hypocrisy For Abrahams upright walking was the terms upon which God at first proposed to enter into a Covenant with him Secondly That Abraham was not justified by works according to St. Paul though his faith that was counted for Righteousness included his obedience is thus evident St. Pauls business is to prove against the Jews that Abraham who came first under the Law of Circumcision and from whom they derived themselves for it appears by their discourses with our Saviour when they cryed out We have Abraham to our Father that they went no higher was justified before he came under the Law of Circumcision before he was obliged to the oeconomie of the Law upon Gospel-principles and so those had the precedence of legal even in Abraham their Father upon the terms of another Covenant the Condition of which was Faith upon such terms as both Jews and Gentiles were to be justified then under the Gospel Upon which account the Scripture stiles him the common Father of all the faithful Abrahant before that faith of his that was accounted to him for Righteousness had lived for some time in Heathen Idolatry and was a great sinner and so could not pretend to be justified by a sinless perfection which the Law required and the Jews insisted on and so not by works in that sense He was one of the ungodly St. Paul speaks of in 4th to the Rom. who had not Legal perfection had not such works to plead as would make the reward in strict rules Justice to be of debt His Justification was upon the very same terms that the Gentiles then might be justified upon though they had lived in the grossest Idolatry and that was by believing the revelation of God in Christ charging their course of life and becoming obedient to what God should require of them In short Abrahams faith and obedience was not such Righteousness as in its own nature and by its own intrinsick worth would justifle any man from the guilt of all his sin and denominate him perfectly a Righteous person for had it so been in it self it needed not any favour to have been accounted for Righteousness But God was pleased out of grace so to reckon and account it Abraham having blelieved God about the promises of the Messiah that was to spring out of his family by whom himself and all the world were to be saved for the sum of all Gods converse with Abraham was to shew him Christs day and reveal to him the Salvation that was to come by him God was pleased to give the world an instance in his imputing that faith of Abraham to him for Righteousness how and upon what terms men should be saved by the Messiah when he did come in a word what should be the condition he would require of us to perform by the Gospel that is By believing the revelation of Christ and acting suitably thereunto by a sincere though imperfect obedience This God would impute and account for Righteousness This
act accordingly that is to pursue the Ends of that Faith in all such acts of obedience as are subsequently required of us And this God sees virtually contained in the first Act of true Faith and the seeds of all future sincere persevering obedience therein And upon that account accepts thereof at first as the performance of the whole condition required by the Gospel legally to intitle us to the priviledge of a Justified state SECT V. ANd now the last thing proposed to be inquired after How and upon what terms we come to arrive at the benefits of a Justified state having been thus resolved that we arrive thereunto by coming up to the terms proposed by the Gospel and performing the condition therein required which is briefly comprized by our Saviour in Believing It will turn much to our account in this present Discussion to inquire with some farther particularity what is intended and comprehended therein And of that we may be much informed by the consideration of these three things First The way and method that God takes to justifie a sinner being originated in the depths of his infinite Counsels no way ever to be found out or discovered but by Revelation a great mystery hid from ages and a thing very incredible to a carnal mind and no way suited to the corrupt Reasonings of Flesh and Blood God expects in the first place that we should fully credit it and firmly give our assent to its veracity And this is in it self a very Righteous Act and so accounted of God firmly to believe him in what he reveals to us And herein the faith of the Gospel and that of Abraham in whose steps we are bid to tread do perfectly resemble each other For he believed God about diverse things in their own nature very hard to be credited He staggred not through unbelief but hoped against hope and still relyed upon Gods veracity and all-sufficiency Secondly God requires of us That he having revealed from Heaven such a glorious and extraordinary way of Justification and Salvation so far out of our own compass and span as is the sending of his Son to assume our nature and in that nature to perfect and compleat all that concern'd our present und future welfare He expects upon this that we should adore this Revelation bow before it with the greatest acknowledgments we are capable of making rely upon it acquiesce in it and be perfectly silenced to all attempts our own Wisdom can suggest to us about this matter And herein the faith of the Gospel answers punctually to that of Abraham For he wholly quitted all those methods carnal and corrupted reason would have directed him to He left his Country and his fathers house and went he knew not whither In a word he forsook the conduct of his own wisdom Believed whatever God told him Did all he bad him and Went whithersoever he called him whatever Difficulties appeared to himself and whatever Censures he lay exposed to from others in his so doing Thirdly God and the Mediator require of us that we should become Obedient to a New Recovering Law of Grace as the condition of our Pardon and Justification In a word That we should subject our selves to all the precepts of the Gospel For Christ as Mediator erects a Kingdom His exaltation is to be a Prince as well as a Saviour a Prince in being a Saviour and whosoever will be saved by him must become one of his Subjects must submit to the regiment of his Kingdom and subject himself to his Laws And herein the faith of Abraham and the faith of every Believer answer one to another as face answereth face in a glass For Abrahams Justification was upon performance of the terms and condition of the New Covenant The Apostle proves he was justified by faith which was to be justified upon the terms of another Covenant and not that of the Law For the law is not of faith nor faith of the Law there was no relation at all between faith and law the law made no promise to faith the promises of the law were to perfect obedience And as the Apostle with convincing evidence urgeth against the Jews Abraham was justified by a faith he had before he was circumcised or had any thing to do with the Law And that faith of Abraham was more then a bare fruitless assent to what God revealed to him 'T was such a faith as put him upon Action and approved its own truth by a suitable obedience And of this we are sufficiently informed by the Story it self in Genesis and by St. James his Comment upon it Some things there are to be remarked in this Disposal of God that highly exalt his Wisdom Holiness and Justice And some things that to a very stupendious degree do magnisie his Mercy First How is the Wisdom Holiness and Justice of God made very transparent by such a dispensing Pardon and Justification as this How suitable is this method to himself He forgives not as the Greatest of men often do and think it an effect of the most supream soveraignty so to do as if in forgiveness nothing were to be done but singly to exercise an act of soveraignty But he forgives like the Lord our Maker That eternal Jehovah who is wonderful in counsel and excellent in working with whom are inherent infinite Attributes none of which in the least can be Denyed or in the least Oppose or Contradict each other He proceeds in all he does in methods chalk'd out by his infinite Wisdom wherein they are all attempered together and do after an admirable manner harmonize each with other He annexeth such conditions to his forgiveness as no way lessen the grace and bounty of it and yet at the same time record his immutable holiness and justice Secondly The greatest righteousness that ever was extant the holyest state of man that he is capable of in his lapsed condition is introduced by the gospel and the precepts thereof and the greatest homage from Earth to Heaven that can be And yet all flesh put to silence in the performance of it We stand justified at Gods Bar in a way of Gods providing and contriving and we perform the Condition required of us solely by the power of his grace freely conferred upon us The glory of all redounds to God alone No Reward can be of Debt 〈◊〉 for all the Rewards of the Gospel are but Gods gracious remunerations of his own gifts and graces Free grace and Divine bounty is the Root that bears all nor can there be any boasting against that Root The holiest man that lives upon earth has the greatest occasion as having received most to abase himself and lie lowest in the dust before God in the Sense thereof in his best performances Thirdly By this method of forgiving these two great Ends are attained First Gods solemn hatred and dislike of sin is made very evident He save no man in his sin but from his sin Whom he
justifies he sanctifies No mans sin is so forgiven as that the least allowance is vouchsafed to it How impossible were if for God openly to tolerate a Rebellion as all sin is for 't is a disobedience to some Law against himself How inconsistent were it with his Holiness and his Soveraignty By the Conditions God has annexed to his Forgiveness 't will evidently appear before men and Angels what a Contrariety and Opposition there is in God to all sin resulting from the essential Purity of his nature And that none but such as are sanctified can be accepted of him Secondly By the performance of these conditions we are made meet for Glory 't is approaching Heaven gradually 'T is impossible without holiness to see God And 't is our great happiness that so great a stress is laid upon our attaining to it That we are under so solemn an obligement to our greatest Interest Doubtless the most effectual way to introduce sanctity was to make it conditionally necessary to our Justification and to oblige us to forsake our sins upon our utmost Peril and greatest Penalty Some things there are also observable in this Gospel method of Pardon by which the grace and mercy of God are made greatly evident and appear in their highest elevation First The Precepts of this new recovering Law of Grace the commands of the Gospel our obedience to which is made conditionally necessary to a justified state They are such as appear to be wholly calculated for our advantage and welfare The yoke of Christ 't is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a gracious benigne bountiful yoke and his burden is a light burden His commands are in no sort Grievous to any man truly and rationally informed of his own welfare God has not arbitrarily commanded us as he might do for we owe him all conceivable subjection but singly oblig'd us to such precepts as are in their own nature absolutely necessary to our present and future welfare In short he has only bid us live a sober righteous religious life here such as is rationally Best for our selves and others and be gradually preparing for those Eternal fruitions that are to come Whoever comes short of Heaven by not performing the Gospel-condition denyes his own present as well as future Interest And 't will be a black Reflection hereafter to consider That whatever brought us to a state of Misery in the Next world made us also unhappy in This That God requited no more of us to qualifie us for future Felicity Then that we would live wisely and profitably to our selves and usefully to others here Secondly Whatever is by the Gospel Conditionally required of us is all freely and fully given to us Faith at first and every other Grace in pursuance of it is the gift of God Whatever we are commanded to do as a peculiar and principle effect of Christs purchase by the Law of Grace we receive a power to perform The Holy Ghost upon Christs ascension was eminently sent from Heaven for that very purpose and will not cease in his operations till all the members of Christs Body are fully inabled to perform the Whole of what the Gospel requires at their hands This is an apparent Effect of the highest Grace and Goodness and renders Christ as free a Gift to the World as if no Condition had been annexed to the proposal of him since the power of performing all is Freely conferred upon us when from the Greatness Holiness and Justice of God and our own present and future welfare it became necessary that such holy Conditions there should be God in his boundless Grace undertakes in Christ and obliges himself by his Covenant to furnish us with ability for their utmost performance By which method the whole will appear perfectly made up of free grace The Satisfaction contriv'd provided accepted and the condition performed And every saved person will appear righteous both before God and the world and 't will be very apparently a righteous thing with God to bring such unto Glory who have Christs righteoussness by way of satisfaction and compensation to answer for them with respect to the Law and their own faith and sincere though imperfect obedience to answer the terms of the Gospel Thirdly This gracious recovering Law of the Mediator 'T is not given as God gave the first Law to Adam and as he after gave the Law upon Mount Sinai requiring exact and punctual obedience in every circumstance of it upon the greatest penalty But 't is given from the hand of a Mediator upon far more gentle and mitigated terms 'T is required by it that we be deeply and thoroughly sensible of the ill of our former state and conversation while without God and Christ in the world and strangers to this grace of Gospel and of our utter inability to procure acceptance with God any other way be rationally satisfied of the excellency of that life the Gospel calls us unto of the glorious reward that will ensue And so make a solemn choice of it to our selves and sincerely resolve as men of Truth and Fidelity ought strenuously to endeavour to attain to it to live in the practice of every duty the Gospel annexes to our state and condition and to depart from every Gospel-sin This conviction and resolution the Gospel makes indispensibly necessary and 't is compriz'd in all sincere and true Faith But 't is thus qualified for the advantage of an offender That that which constitutes and preserves the union between Christ and a Believer the thred that tyes a man to Christ as I may so express it in the whole performance of the Gospel-condition is sincerity of Intention and endeavour and what could the Great God require and accept less from the hand of an Apostate Creature and not perfection of Action And this sincerity too reckon'd as much to our advantage as possible may be That is Whatever can upon the utmost allowances be truly so called shall be so reputed And he that can enter a just claim to the lowest degree of sincerity that is when all the Infirmities that can accompany sincerity and not overwhelm and extinguish it that can consist with its denomination so to be are admitted shall yet be accounted a sincere man and numbred amongst those that are truly so Till this thred of sincerity be utterly broke the union between Christ and a Believer is never Dissolved but he still remains in a justified state before God Though a man sin often through infirmity and strength of Temptation and the best men so sin very often if his Resolution abide firm and sincere for obedience to Christ and holy living he is still reckoned to perform the Gospel-condition and abide in a justified state Such a man is in the first Latitude of Gospel-forgiveness But if a man through the power and prevalency of his Lusts and the violent impetuous assaults of temptation have an invasion made upon his sincerity that is that a man often fails