him and of all his benefits both of grace in this life namely of the forgiuenesse of sinnes of sanctification of gifts needfull for our particular calling and in the world to come of euerlasting life and glory Finally that these things being thus performed with thanksgiueings and petitions for our selues and the whole militant Church of Christ agreeably to Gods word and that sacred action the whole administration is finished to the glory of God and the edification of such as haue beene partakers of that holy table In all which administration there is nothing but that was taught and done by our Sauiour Christ and his Apostles Math. 26.26 c. Mark 14.22 c. Luk. 22.4 19 c. 1 Cor. 11 22.23 c. For our Sauiour at the first institution of his holy Supper deliuered the Doctrine which hee intended should be confirmed by it and that in a speech vnderstood by his Disciples and gaue commandement vnto them to doe the like and to shew forth by it the comemmoration of his death vntill his coming againe In like manner did the Apostles Act. 2.42 For the Euangelist Luke reporting that the Disciples continued in the doctrine of the Apostles in communication in breaking of bread and in prayers declareth that the Apostles ioyned Doctrine with the administration of this Sacrament and with prayer all the actions of that spirituall communion and societie which the Church of Christ at Ierusalem had together The like appeareth in the Apostle Paul 1 Cor. 11.23 both in that hee professeth to haue deliuered to the Corinthians concerning this Sacrament that which hee had receiued of the Lord and more particularly by that long speech which hee had at Troas before the administration of this Sacrament Act. 20 7. Act. 2 42. there also noted and comprehended vnder breaking of bread Moreouer concerning the administration in both kinds it is most manifest by the story of the Gospel and by the writing of the Apostle Paul that lesus Christ tooke bread and brake it and gaue it to his Disciples and likewise that he tooke wine and hauing giuen thanks not only gaue it to the Disciples to drinke but with these expresse words Drinke yee all of this Whereby it is most plaine that our administration of the Lords Supper in both kinds is according to that the Lord himselfe did at the first institution of it Yea it is also according to that hee commanded after to bee done in that he said Doe yee this in remembrance of mee Mat. 26.27 And more particularly concerning the cup Drinke yee all of this Which being the Doctrine practice and commandement of the Lord himselfe it cannot be doubted but the Apostles did both so administer it and teach concerning the administration of it especially seeing the Apostle Paul professeth which faithfulnesse is to be esteemed to haue bene also in all the other Apostles that hee deliuered to the Church that which hee receiued from the Lord. viz. as before hath bene declared that the Lord deliuered to his Disciples both bread and wine Whereby it is to bee vnderstood that whereas sometimes this Sacrament is noted or comprehended vnder the speech of breaking bread that it is not meant that it was administred in bread only but it is a speech that by one part doth note the whole Supper of the Lord administred in both kindes of bread and wine which is confirmed also to haue bene so deliuered by the Apostles by the practice of the primitiue church which did so administer it as it appeareth by the Apologie of Iustine Martyr so reporting of the administration of it Now as this order of administration of the Lords Supper vsed in our English church thus appeareth to haue beene receiued from the Doctrine practise and commandement of Christ him selfe and of his Apostles and so to haue beene vsed in the Primitiue Church so on the Contrary part the Sea of Rome hath in effect abolished the Supper of the Lord in their Masse hauing neither bread nor wine in the administration of it For the bread they say after Consecration is turned into the reall body of Christ which being flesh and bones it followeth by their Doctrine that there is no bread left in the Sacrament as it is ministred by them which errours of the reall and bodily presence and of the change and transubstantiation of the bread into the flesh of Christ are conuicted to be most absurd and erroneous both by the Scriptures and by common sence and reason For the Scripture euen after the consecration and setting apart of the bread to that sacred and holy vse to bee a Sacrament of the Lords Body doth often call it bread as it appeareth in the first Epistle to the Corinthians Chap. 11. where it is said The Bread that wee breake is it not the Cemmanion of the body of Christ Pillip 2.6.7 Heb. 4.15 And in the Chap. 11. As oft as yee shall eate of this bread and after diuers times This appeareth also in that the Scriptures teach that Christ became Man hauing the true nature of man like to vs in all things sinne only excepted Which prooueth that his body cannot bee in the small compasse of a wafer cake hauing the dimensions and measures of length breadth and thicknesse which other mens bodyes haue And whereas it is pretended to bee so by miracle this is disproued two waies First in that the Scriptures which make expresse mention of Christs miracles doe neuer make mention nor obseruation of any miracle to haue bene done by him in this changing bread into his body Secondly the Scriptures making mention of any miraculous change of one substance into another doe declare that the change hath beene such as was to bee iudged discerned and perceiued by all meanes of vnderstanding both of sence and reason As for example when Christ changed water into wine Iohn 2.9 10 11. the wine was perceiued to be wine by the sight and tast so discerning of it But in this case neither doth the eye see any flesh nor the tast discerne of any but contrariwise that the bread remaineth bread still in substance appeareth by the fight smelling sauour and the taste thereof by the effect of nourishing by the place where it is on earth and by the accidents of whitenesse smalnesse roundnesse and by that it becometh in time to bee subiect to bee mouldy and that it may bee eaten by Mice and Vermine But it is most false erronious and blasphemous to affirme that the body of Christ which is most glorious in heauen can bee subiect to any of these accidents Besides how great is that blasphemy whereby it is said vnder pretence of this transubstantiation that the Priest is the Creator of his Creator maker of his maker But it would aske a long time to lay out the arguments reasons that confute this absurd damnable error and this labour is already partly bestowed in answer to another
and together with him doe God that honor that thereby they acknowledge all good guifts to come from him and therefore that they ought to be desired of him by prayer and that he is to be glorified for them with all thanksgiuing Therefore that God may be honoured with all this honor it behooueth and is necessary that he be serued in the Church in a speech that the people vnderstand Furthermore the edification of the people doth require the same 1 Cor. 14.26 concerning which it is the Lords expresse commandement That in the Church all things should bee done to their Edification By edification is meant their furtherance in the knowledge of God in the vnderstanding of the Scripture in faith in obedience in comfort and all Christian duties But none of these can be furthered in the people if the Minister vse a language which the people doth not vnderstand Therefore it is necessary for the instruction and comfort of the people that the Scriptures be read and expounded the Sacraments administred the Prayers and thanksgiuing bee made in the Church in a speech that all the people doth vnderstand On the contrary part by administring of diuine Seruice in a speech not vnderstood by the people both God is dishonoured and the people are suffered to perish For touching the first point Gods commandements of the right vse of his guift of tongues of doing all things in the Church to edification are broken God is also highly dishonoured in that the knowledge of him is kept from the people that his name is taken in vaine and Seruice prophaned and his people suffered to perish in ignorance and disobedience Concerning the peoples perishing by this meanes it is plaine in that the blind led by the blind must needes perish By this meanes they doe remaine in their sinnes and namely in the ignorance of God which howsoeuer the adherents of the Church of Rome teach to bee the mother of deuotion the word of God teacheth to be the iust cause of error disobedience and destruction For it is said Math 22.29 that the seruant that knoweth not the will of his Master shall be beaten Luke 12.47 48. it is said indeed with few stripes in comparison of the many stripes wherewith they shall be beaten which know their Masters will and do it not but by those few stripes are meant euerlasting torments 1 Thes 1.7 8 2. as the Apostle Paul teacheth saying And to you which are troubled rest with vs when the Lord Iesus shall shew himselfe from heauen with his mighty Angels in flaming fire rendering vengeance vnto them that doe not know God and which obey not the Gospell of our Lord Iesus Christ which shall bee punished with euerlasting perdition from the presence of the Lord-and from the glory of his power Now as the Church is edified by him that prophecieth 1 Cor. 14 3 4. receiueth instruction exhortation comfort and direction whereby they may ioyne together in Prayes and thanksgiuing So on the contrary they want all these meanes when diuine Seruice is administred in a strange tongue which they doe not vnderstand For the minister speaketh not to them that is to their vnderstanding and therefore whatsoeuer heauenly doctrine bee read or deliuered in a strange tongue the people is nothing instucted by it but departeth from the Church as ignorant of God of all godlynes as they came to it And as hee that is ignorant is not instructed in any thing so he that is dull and sloathfull in his duty to God or man according to Gods commandement is not furthered by exhortation nor he that is heauy in heart is not comforted verse 16. likewise when the minister prayeth or giueth thanks he can neither pray nor giue thanks with him nor answer firly to any thing he pronounceth because he vnderstandeth not what it is that he sayeth For this cause the Apostle saith that their vnderstanding remaineth fruitelesse and that fiue wordes spoken to their vnderstanding were more worth then many thousands in that sort And in respect of the Prophet or minister hee saith that in so doing verse 2 9. hee speaketh in regard of any benefit of the people as if hee spake into the ayre and his speech vanished away with the winde without profit to any Furthermore he sayeth verse 7 8 9. that the minister so speaking is like one that should sound a trumpet or strike a harpe or anyother Instrument without distinction of sounds whereby he intendeth that as the people not vnderstanding could receiue by it no direction in battell to march or retyre or in other actions what to doe or whereunto to prepare and dispose themselues So in the seruice of God they know not what they are directed vnto whether to pray to God or to giue him thankes or to what other part of the Seruice of God they are to apply themselues Moreouer verse 11. â—0 23. the Apostle affirmeth that where this disorder hath place they are as Barbarians one to another they are as little children in vnderstanding yea they will seeme to bee out of thir wits and destitute of common sence and reason Finally the Apostle addeth that to speake to the people in a language they doe not vnderstand is a token and signe of Gods wrath and anger to them Which may be easily vnderstood by some like thing in our life with men For if a seruant or a sonne that hath offended his Lord and Father or a subiect that hath transgressed the lawes of his Prince should present himselfe to him to craue pardon of his offence and to pray to vnderstand his pleasure that hee may performe it in time to come if that Lord that Father or that King shall not graciously comfort his supplyant but speake to him in a tongue that hee vnderstandeth not and so dismisse him is not that a manifest figne of his anger and indignation Euen so when any assembly of Christian people shall gather themselues together to present theÌ„selues to God to craue of him grace pardon for their sins to offer their petitions and seruice to him it must needes bee an heauy and vncomfortable token vnto them of Gods high displeasure toward them when hee vouchsafeth not to speake any gracious words vnto them that they can vnderstand but speaketh to them in a strange language Heereby therefore it appeareth that to haue diuine Seruice administred in a tongue not vnderstood by the people is contrary to the doctrine of our Sauiour Christ and his Apostles yea and that it is childish barbarous and contrary to coÌ„mon sence and reason vnprofitable for the people yea a hinderance to them and a meanes to keepe them in ignorance and all vngodlynesse and a signe of Gods indignation against them and a high dishonor to almighty God by the transgession of his commandements and taking his name in vaine Contrariwise heereby it appeareth that to administer diuine Seruice in a tongue
God then the shedding of the water in the streetes For it is by the blood of God as saith the Apostle whereby the Church is bought and purchased A 20.26 by which blood as hee made propitiation for our sinnes so it is by the same blood being of inestimable value because of the infinite dignitie of his person by which hee is entered into the presence of God to make intercession for vs. It is therefore of no vse that is said that hee is the onely mediator of propitiation but not of intercession For as it hath bene shewed by these reasons hee hath as good right to bee honored with this glory to bee the onely intercessor for his Church as hee hath to bee the onely giuer of all satisfaction for our sinnes Finally it behooueth that our intercessor bee God that hee may know the necessities of this people and vnderstand their groanes which cannot bee vttered but this agreeth not to any creature onely much lesse to men Thus then it appeareth in how high degree the Liturgie of the Church of Rome is contrary to the Doctrine of Christ and his Apostles and derogatory to the honor of God and of his onely Sonne in that prayers are made to any other then to God onely and that resting vpon the Prayers and intercession of many others and not onely of Iesus Christ Contrary wise hereby it may appeare that our Religion and diuine Seruice in England in these two last and excellent poynts concerning Prayer is according to the Doctrine of Christ and of his Apostles that wee pray to God onely and that by the onely mediation of Iesus Christ the righteous who is also the propitiation for our sinnes Thus it hath beene shewed both in the word whereunto the Sacraments are annexed and also in prayer in which two parts principally consisteth the whole seruice of God that our Religion professed in England is the same which was taught by Iesus Christ and by his Apostles which was desired to be proued and further that the Liturgie of the Church of Rome in all the poynts heere debated is directly contrary to the Apostolicall Doctrine and that which was deliuered by the Lord Iesus himselfe Which being so performed heere might bee an end of this Treatise but that it is further desired to bee shewed if any of the Martyres haue giuen testimony to that Religion which in England is professed For satisfaction wherein here is added that which followeth CHAP. X. Of Martyrs MArtyr is originally a Greeke word and signifieth in English a witnesse which generall signification by an elegancy of speech is vsed by the Church to note such as testifie and beare witnesse of true Religion and of the right Seruice of God and of faith in Iesus Christ euen by the suffering of death rather then to deny the truth of God So as in this sence Martyr is a witnesse of true Religion by his suffering of death for it Such in the time of the Prophets were Daniel and his three noble kinsmen of the tribe of Iudah Dan. 3.20.21 For these three rather then they would worship Nebuchadnezzars golden Image and yeeld to an Idoll the honour due to the onely true God endured to bee cast into the furnace of fire From which though God by miracle deliuered them yet are they worthily accounted Martyrs for their most constant resolution Dan. 6.16 Likewise Daniel rather then hee would not yeeld vnto God the honor of prayer endured to bee cast into the denne of Lyons for his noble Profession In the new Testament our Sauiour speaking of Martyrdome saith Math. 5.11 Blessed are yee when men persecute you for righteousnesse and for my sake And forewarning his Disciples of such Persecution saith You shall beare witnesse of mee Iohn 15.27 Iohn 16.2 and they will put you out of their synagogue and whosoeuer shall kill you shall thinke hee doth God good seruice The Apostle Peter saith If any man suffer because hee is a Christian 1 Pet 4.16 let him not hee ashawed let him rather glorifie God on this behalfe Thus also wrighteth the Apostle Paul alledging it out of the Psalmes Psal 44.22 Rom. 8.36 For thy sake are wee put to death all the day long wee are accounted as sheepe for the slaughter By these and many other like testimonies it appeareth that a true Martyr dyeth for no other cause but for a good iust and holy cause and namely for witnesse bearing to true Religion as for refusing to worship Idols and for professing himselfe a Christian and one that honoreth Christ and 〈…〉 the Doctrine of the Gospel that hee taught and professeth to belieue to bee saued by him Which being thus proued by these generall testimonies shall bee likewise confirmed by the examples of such true Martyrs to the end that hereby it may appeare that whosoeuer are to bee acknowledged to haue beene true Martyrs haue suffered for earing witnesse to some principall doctrine of the same Religion that together with all Christendome is professed at this day in England and not for maintenance of any of the errors or false worships maintained by the Sea of Rome and wherein they being fallen away from the truth of the Gospel dissent from many nations of the Christian world They challenge indeed to themselues that all the Martyrs that dyed in the Primitiue Church dyed for their Religion But it is not to bee shewed that they dyed for that Corruption of Christian Religion that is properly called Popery because it hath beene and is still maintained by the authority of Popes but onely for refusing to worship Idols for professing to beleeue in God and in Iesus Christ our Sauiour Which being the holy faith now professed in England and in many other nations of Christendome that agree with vs therein it will appeare that all the Martyrs of the primitiue Church dyed for the maintenance of that Seruice of God and for that faith of Christ which is now professed in England which is the other part that is defired to be proued Now for the proofe let vs first consider of the Martyrs recorded in the new Testament Whereof the first that obtained the Crowne of Martyrdome was Steuen who had beene one of the Seuen Deacons of the Church of Ierusalem Of him it is manifest that hee was stoned to death in a fury of the Iewes after that hee had giuen notable testimony to Iesus Christ First by his great signes and wonders that hee did Secondly his so wise and Zealous reasoning with men of the Synagogues and schools of the Iewes of diuers nations that were in Ierusalem as they were not able to withstand the wisedome and spirit wherewith hee spake Thirdly Act. 6.10 Act. 7 2 c. V. 52. V. 55 V. 59 by his notable Apologie which hee made for himselfe before the High-Priest and the whole Consistory his face shining as an Angel concluding it with charging their Fathers to haue slayne the