there contained and the benefit and good that foloweth of it we receive upon tradition though the thing it selfe we receive not for tradition Of this sort is the Baptisme of Infants which may be named a Tradition because it is not expressely delivered in Scripture that the Apostles did Baptize Infants nor any expresse precept there found that they should so doe yet is not this so received by bare and naked tradition but that we finde the Scripture to deliver unto us the ground of it Bellarmine and Maldonate both doe confesse that the Baptisme of Infants may be proved by the Scripture and therefore Maldonate concludes nobis verò traditio non est Bellarmine * as Whitaker shewes contradicts himselfe for first he saith that the Baptisme of Infants is an unwritten tradition and after that the Catholicks can prove Baptisme of Infants from the Scriptures To this head we may referre the observation of the Lords day the precept whereof is not found in Scripture though the practise be And if for that cause any shall name it a Tradition we will not contend about the word if he grant withall that the example Apostolicall hath the force of a Law as implying a common equity concerning us no lesse then it did them If any man shall call the summary comprehension of the chief heads of Christian doctrine contained in the Creed commonly called the Apostles Creed a tradition we will not contend about it For although every part thereof be contained in Scripture yet the orderly connexion distinct explication of those principall Articles gathered into an Epitome wherein are implyed and whence are inferred all conclusions Theologicall is an Act humane not divine and in that sense may be called a Tradition But let it be noted withall that we admit it not to have that credit as now it hath to be the rule of faith for this is the priviledge of holy Scripture The Creed it selfe was gathered out of Scripture and is to be expounded by the Scripture therefore it is not given to be a perfect Canon of faith and manners By Tradition is noted 1. Whatsoever is delivered by men divinely inspired and immediately called whether it be by lively voyce or by writing 2. In speciall it notes the word of God committed to writing 1 Cor. 15. 3. 3. It signifies rites expressely contained in writing Act. 6. 14. 4. It betokens that which is not committed to writing but onely delivered by lively voyce of the Apostles 5. It signifieth that which is invented and delivered by men not immediately called In Scripture Tradition is taken 1. in good part for any rite or doctrine of God delivered to his Church either by word or writing whether it concern faith and good works or the externall government of the Church 2 Thess. 2. 15. 1 Cor. 11. 15. 23. 2. In ill part it noteth the vaine idle and unwarrantable inventions of men whether Doctrine or Rites Matthew 15. 3. Marke 7. 8 9. When the Fathers speake reverently of Traditions by the word Tradition either they understand the holy Scripture which also is a Tradition it is a Doctrine left unto us Or by Traditions they understand observations touching Ecclesiastill policy D. Moulin Reasons confirming the sufficiency of Scripture against Popish traditions 1. The whole Church is founded upon the Doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles which were not true if any doctrin was necessary to salvation not revealed by the Prophets and Apostles 2. The Prophets and Christ and his Apostles condemne Traditions Esay 29. 13. Mathew 15. 3. 6. Col. 2. 8. Therefore they are not to be received Christ opposeth the Commandement and Scriptures to Traditions therefore he condemnes Traditions not written If the Jewes might not adde to the Bookes of Moses then much lesse may wee adde to the Canon of Scripture so much increased since 3. Those things which proceede from the will of God onely can be made knowne to us no other way but by the Revelation of the Scripture all Articles of Faith and Precepts of Manners concerning substance of Religion proceede from the Will of God onely Mathew 16. 17. 1 Cor. 2. 9 10 11. Gal. 1. 8. As in this place the Apostle would have nothing received besides that which he Preached so 1 Cor. 4. 6. He will have nothing admitted above or more then that which is written See Act. 26. 22. John 20. ult whence it is manifest that all necessary things may be found in Scripture since full and perfect Faith ariseth from thence which eternall salvation followeth Bellarmin saith John speakes onely of the miracles of Christ that hee wrote not all because those sufficed to perswade the World that Christ was the Sonne of God Those words indeede in the 30 Verse are to be understood of Christs Miracles but those in the 31. Verse rather are to be generally interpreted for the History onely of the Miracles sufficeth not to obtaine Faith or Life The question betwixt the Papists and us is de ipsa doctrina tradita non de tradendi modo touching the substance of the Doctrine delivered not of the manner of delivering it and of Doctrine delivered as the Word of God not of Rites and Ceremonies They maintaine that there bee doctrinall Traditions or Traditions containing Articles of Faith and substantiall matters of Divine worship and Religion not found in the holy Scriptures viz. Purgatory Invocation of Saints Adoration of Images Papall Monarchy Bellarmin and before him Peresius distinguisheth Traditions both from the authours and the matter From the Authours into Divine Apostolicall and Ecclesiasticall From the matter into those which are concerning Faith and concerning Manners into perpetuall and temporall universall and particular necessary and free Divine Traditions that is Doctrines of Faith and of the worship and service of God any of which we deny to be but what are comprised in the written Word of God Apostolike Traditions say they are such Ordinances as the Apostles prescribed for ceremony and usage in the Church as the observation of the memoriall of the Nativity Death and Resurrection of Christ the alteration of the seventh day from the Jewes Sabbath to the day of Christs Resurrection Ecclesiasticall ancient Customes which by degrees through the Peoples consent obtained the force of a Law Traditions concerning Faith as the perpetuall Virginity of Mary the Mother of Christ and that there are onely foure Gospels of Manners as the signe of the Crosse made in the forehead Fasts and Feastings to be observed on cetaine dayes Perpetuall which are to bee kept to the end of the World Temporall for a certaine time as the observation of certaine legall Ceremonies even to the â—ull publishing of the Gospell Universall Traditions which are delivered to the whole Church to be kept as the observation of Easter Whitsontide and other great Feasts Particular which is delivered to one or more Churches as in the
the Gospell doth declare evidently that he taught nothing but that which is contained in Scripture seeing the Apostle defineth the Gospell which he preached to be that which is contained in the Scriptures Fifthly That the Thessalonians had some part of Christian doctrine delivered by word of mouth that is by the Apostles preaching at such time as he did write unto them and some part by his Epistles the Text enforceth us to grant But that the Church at this day or ever since the Testament was written had any Tradition by word of mouth necessary to salvation which was not contained in the Old and New Testament we will never grant The Papists doe commonly abuse the name of Tradition which signiâ—ieth properly a delivery or a thing delivered for such a matter as is delivered onely by word of mouth and so received from hand to hand that is never put in writing but hath his credit without the Holy Scripture of God as the Jewes had their Cabala and the Scribes and the Pharisees their Traditions besides the Law of God For the justifying of our translation it is true that we alter according to the circumstances of the place especially considering that the word Tradition which of it selfe is indifferent as well to that which is written as to that which is not written hath been of us and them appropriated to note forth onely unwritten constitutions therefore we must needs avoide in such places as this the word Traditions though our last translation useth it where the simple might be deceived to thinke that the Holy Ghost did over commend any such to the Church which he would not have committed to writing in the holy Scriptures and in stead of the word so commonly taken although it doe not necessarily signifie any such matter we doe use such words as doe truly expresse the Apostles meaning and the Greeke word doth also signifie therefore we use these words Ordinances or Instructions Institutions or the doctrine delivered all which being of one or neere sence the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth signifie and the same doth Tradition signifie if it be rightly understood Ob. 1 Tim. 6. 20. O Timothy keep that which is committed to thy trust By the name of pledge saith Bellarmine not the Scripture but the treasure of unwritten doctrine is understood Depositum say the Rhemisis is the whole doctrine of Christianity being taught by the Apostles and delivered their successors Sol. Though other learned men interprete this pledge or gage to be the gift of the holy Ghost yet we willingly acknowledge that it is to be understood of the doctrine of Christianity as that which hath best ground both by circumstance of this and conferrence of other places Whence we inferre that the doctrine of truth is not the Churches dâ—crees but the Lords given to the Church to keepe onely wherewith the title of a pledge cannot stand unlesse one may lay to pledge a thing in his own hands since in Popery the Church her selfe maketh the doctrine which her selfe taketh to pledge Herein they handle it like a pledge that they lock it up fast where the people of God for whose use it is given to be kept cannot come unto it What had become of the Law of God if others had not been more faithfull keepers of it then the Priests to whom the principall Copy thereof written with the singer of God himselfe was committed There are some points of faith not contained in Scripture neither in the Old nor New Testament therefore it is not perfect In the old Testament no doubt but the females had some remedy whereby they might be purged from originall sin as well as the males circumcision was instituted only for the males the Scripture mentions not what was instituted for the females In the new Testament the perpetuall virginity of Mary the mother of Christ. Two things are considered in circumcision 1. Signum 2. Res signata or the end and use of the signe Sol. The thing signified or efficacie of the outward signe of circumcision was common both to Males and Females the very institution of circumcision teacheth that for it was a signe of the Covenant the Covenant belonged to all which were of the seed of Abraham if they renounced it not Although there were no decision of the other point out of the Scripture yet would it not thence â—ollow which the Jesuits pretend that some necessary point of Christianity wanted the ground of holy Scripture it being sufficient for us to know that she was a Virgin when our Saviour Christ was borne of her as the Prophets did foretell Yet as Chamier saith well we beleeve that she continued a Virgin all her life time for in those things saith he which are not properly de fide we hold the authority of the Church is great if it contradict not Scripture or produce no other absurdity Vide Riveti Apologiam pro virgine Maria l. 1. c. 15. Helvidius would gather from those words 1 Matth. 25. untill and first borne that Mary after had Children by her husband The word till doth not import so much See Gen. 8. 7. and 28. 15. 1 Sam. 15. 35. 2 Sam. 6. 23. Matth. 28. 20. He is called the first borne in Scripture which first opens the wombe whether other follow or no. 7. The Scripture is plaine and Perspicuous The Perspicuity of the Scripture is a cleare and evident manifestation of the truth delivered in it It is Perspicuous both in respect of it selfe and us 1. In respect of it selfe as appeares 1. In the things delivered which although they seeme obscure for their Maâ—esty and dignity yet they carry the light of truth before them therefore the Scripture is frequently termed a light Psal. 19. 8. and 119. 105. Deut. 30. 11. Prov. 6. 2. 2 Pet. 1. 19. 2 Cor. 4. 3. 4. 6. the Scripture is a most bright light There are 2 things in Gods revealed will verbum rei the word and res verbi the mystery The Scriptures are hard if we looke to the mystery but not if wee looke to the word as for example the Scripture teacheth that there is one God in three persons the words are plaine and easie every man understands them but the mystery contained in those words passeth the reach of man we may well discerne these things to be so though we cannot fully conceive how these should be so 2. In the manner of delivering or kind of stile which is fitted to the things and persons shewing the greatest simplicity both in words either proper or figurative and in the cleare sence and mosâ— perspicuous propriety of signification viz. that one which is called literall and Grammaticall 2. In respect of us because the Scripture is to us the principle meanes and inâ—â—rument of faith every Principle ought to be by it selfe and in its own nature knowne and most Intelligible and there being 3 degrees of
all happinesse promised nay we may invert the words with Hugo de sancto victore and say Quicquid ibi docetur esâ— veritas quicquid praecipitur bonitas quicquid promittitur felicitas All that is there taught is truth all that is there commanded is goodnesse all that is there promised is happinesse It is a wonderfull thing that all the particulars which the Canticles containe being taken from marriage are handled so sincerely that no blemish or spot can be found therein Therefore the Scriptures should be preacht read and heard with holy affections and should be reverently mentioned The â—ewes in their Synagogues will not touch the Bible with unwashed hands they kisse it as often as they open and shut it they sit not on that seat where it is laid and iâ— it fall on the ground they fast for a whole day The Turke writâ—s upon the outside of his Alcoran Let no man touch this Book but he that is pure I would none might meddle with ours Alcorâ—â— signifieth but the Scripture you need not be afraid of the word but such as indeed are what other men doe but think themselvâ—s 6. The Scripture is Perfect The perfection of the Scripture is considered 2 wayes 1. In respect of the matter or the Bookes in which the holy doctrine was written all which as many as were usefull to our salvation have been kept inviolable in the Church so that out of them one most perfect and absolute Canon of faith and life was made and this may be called the Integrity of the Scripture 2. In respect of the forme viz. of the sence or meaning of these Canonicall Books or of Divine truth comprehended in them which Books containe most fully and perfectly the whole truth necessary and sufficient for the salvation of the elect and therefore the Scriptures are to be esteemed a sole adequate totall and perfect measure and rule both of faith and manners and this is the sufficiency of the Scriptures which is attributed to it in a twofold respect 1. Absolutely in it selfe and that in a threefold consideration 1. Of the Principle for every principle whether of a thing or of knowledge ought to be the perfect since demonstration and true conclusions are not deduced from that which it imperfect therefore it is necessary that the holy Scripture being the first only immediate principle of all true doctrine should be most perfect 2. Of the Subject for it hath all Essentiall parts matter and forme and integrall Law and Gospell and is wholy perfect both 1. Absolutely because for the substance it eitheir expressely or Analogically containes the doctrine concerning Faith and Manners which is communicable and profitable for us to know which may be proved also by induction that all necessary opinions of Faith or precepts of life are to be found in the holy Scripture 2. Relatively because as it hath a perfection of the whole so of the parts in the whole that perfection is called essentiall this quantitative For all the Books are Sufficient with an essentiall perfection although integrally they have not a sufficiency of the whole but only their own yet so that at distinct times every part sufficed for their times but all the parts in the whole are but sufficient for us 3. In its effect and operation it makes men perfect 2 Tim 3. 16. 17. Rom. 15. 4. John 2. ult 5. 39. 2. As opposed to unwritten Traditions all which it excludes by its sufficiency but we doe not understand by Traditions generally a Doctrine delivered in Word and Writing but specially a Doctrine not written by Prophets or Apostles whether Dogmaticall Historicall or Ceremoniall for a perfect reason of the primary opinions belonging to Faith and Manners is delivered in Scripture and those things which are out of beside or against the Scripture doe not binde the Conscience 2. Historicall the Sayings and Deedes of Christ and the Apostles are perfectly contained in the Scriptures as many as suâ—fice us for our salvation John 20. 30 31. Those things which are delivered out of Scripture are to be esteemed mans writings 3. Ceremoniall or secondary opinions concerning Ecclesiasticall Rites and Customes are for Essentialls Substantials and Fundamâ—ntals generally contained in the Word of God The accidentals accessaries and circumstantials are free and mutable If Traditions agree with the Scripture they are confirmed by it if they oppose it they are disproved by it The perfection of the Scriptures is not First Infinite and unlimited that is an incommunicable property of God every thing which is from another as the efficiente ause is thereby limited both for the nature and qualities thereof Secondly we doe not understand such a perfection as containeth all and singular such things as at any time have beene by Divine inspiration revealed to holy men and by them delivered to the Church of what sort soever they were for all the Sermons of the Prophets of Christ and his Apostles are not set downe in so many words as they used in the speaking of them for of twelve Apostles seven wrote nothing which yet preached and did many things neither are all the deeds of Christ and his Apostles written for that is contradicted John 20. 30. 31 21. 25. but we meane onely a Relative perfection which for some certaine ends sake agreeth to the Scripture as to an instrument according to which it perfectly comprehendeth all things which have beene are or shall be necessary for the salvation of the Church Thirdly the severall Bookes of Scripture are indeed perfect for their own particular ends purposes uses for which they were intended of the Lord but yet not any one Booke is sufficient to the common end the whole Scripture is compleate in all the parts thereof one speaking of that which another doth wholy passe over in silence one clearely delivering what was intricate in another Paul speakes much of Justification and Predestination in the Epistle to the Romans nothing of the Eucharist or Resurrection Fourthly since God did reveale his will in writing those writings which by Divine hand and providence were extant in the Church were so sufficient for the Church in that Age that it needed not Tradition neither was it lawfull for any humane wight to adde thereto or take therefrom but when God did reveale more unto it the former onely was not then sufficient without the latter Fifthly the holy Scripture doth sufficiently containe and deliver all Doctrines which are necessary for us to eternall salvation both in respect of Faith and good works and most of these it delivereth to us expressely and in so many words and the rest by good and necessary consequence The Baptisme of Infants and the consubstantiality of the Father and of the Sonne are not in those words expressed in Scripture yet is the truth of both cleerely taught in Scripture and by evident proofe may thence be deduced that Article of Christs
must be first laid The excellent definition of catechising which the Apostle here gives yeelds us two good proofes of its necessity 1 It is the doctrine of the beginning of Christ by some rendred not unfitly for the sense which gives beginning in Christ. 2 It is a foundation which beares up all the building without this preaching is to no purpose which though it makes the least shew yet it is of greatest use it establisheth men and keepes them firme from wavering 3 This course is most agreeable 1. To Art all Arts proceed from principles Physitians have their principles Lawyers their maximes Philosophers their chiefe sentences 2 To nature which first formes the vitall parts then the more remote 3. It is sutable to reason Principles are 1. easiest in themselves 2. Facilitate other matters 3. Are the most necessary doctrines of all the rest they beare up all the rest 4. Are of continuall and constant use Prinâ—ipia sunt minima quantitate maxima virtute 4. Gods order and practise hath been still to lay principles things might easily passe from one to another at first they lived so long Cains and Abels sacrificing is an evidence of catechising before the flood there was no word written then therefore it is like their fathers taught them It was practised by Abraham Gen. 18. 19. the fruit of which observe in his sonne Gen 24. 63. and servant Gen. 12. 26. God himselfe writes a Catechisme for the Jewes describing a short compendium of religion in the two authentique tables of the Law Hannah delivered Samuel to Eli his instructor so soon as he was weaned Jehoida taught the young King Jehoash David and Bathsheba practised it 2 Chron. 28. 8 9. Psalm 34. 11. Prov. 4. 4. 31. 1. and Salomon himselfe seeme to give that precept out of the experience of his owne most excellent education Teach a child the trade of his way and when he is old he shall not depart from it though himselfe scarce did so and Eccles. 12. 23. he drawes all which he had said in his whole booke to two heads Feare God and keep his Commandements Catechising was also practised by Christ and his Apostles Luke 2. 46. Acts 22. 3. Heb. 6. 1 2 3. Christ at twelve yeeres old submitted himselfe to be catechised Luke 1. 4. and allowed of Hosanna sung by children He begins with regeneration to Nicodemus and he drew the whole Law into two heads Matth. 22. 37. John and Christ preacht Faith and Repentance and the Apostles after them Theophilus was catechised Luke 1. 4. Apollos Acts 18. 23. Timothy 1 Tim. 3 15. 2 Tim. 2. 2. The Apostle Paul commends to Timothies custody a patterne of wholsome doctrine which he cals a form of doctrine Rom. 6. 17. and the analogy of faith Rom. 12. 6. This duty principally belongs to Ministers their Office is set down under the name of catechising Let him which is catechised make him that catechiseth partaker Gal. 6. 6. Ministers must plant and beget as well as increase and build up feed the Lambs as well as the Sheepe they are compared to Nurses wise Stewards skilfull builders it must be performed by housholders also Ephes. 6. 4. God chargeth parents to performe this duty Deut. 6. 6 7. Rehearse them continually whet them upon thy children often goe over the same thing as a knife doth the whetstone They are bound to bring up their children in the nurture and information of the Lord children were to be taught the meaning of the Passover Exod. 12. 16. Masters of Families also must instruct their servants which are ungrounded as children Christ instructed his Apostles he taught them how to pray he being the Master of the family and they his family as appeareth because he did eate the Passeover together with them and the Law appoints that every family should celebrate that feast together The reason why God specifieth not this point in the masters duty is because if it be performed by the father it shall be needlesse seeing it is done to the masters hand but if the father neglect it surely the master which succeeds in the fathers roome and hath his authority must see it done For as a father in Israel was bound to see his owne sonne circumcised so he was bound to see his servant circumcised and if to circumcise him sure he must as well make him as his child to know what circumcision meaned And what Christ did as a master of a family that must every master of family doe seeing we must be followers of Christ every one in his place therefore every one must instruct his ignorant servants in the truths of Religion The Jewes did use catechizing Cyprian saith Optatus exercised it at Carthage and Origen at Alexandria Clemens Alexandrinus had his paedagogus Lactantius and Calvin their Institutions Athanasius his Synopsis Austin his Euchiridion his bookes de doctrina Christiana and de catechizandis rudibus Catechizing is institutio viva voce a kind of familiar conference The Hebrew verbe Chanach signifieth to instruct or traine up even from childhood and to initiate or dedicate from which word holy Henoch had his name importing nurture in the feare of God The Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to sound or resound as by an eccho and is applied even by Heathen writers unto that kinde of teaching which is by word of mouth sounding in the eare of him that is taught and especially unto the teaching of the first rudiments of any science whatsoever It signifieth any kind of vocall instruction Acts 21. 21 24. viz. that whereby the principles of Christian doctrine are made known unto the hearers as Luke 1. 4. instructed or catechized Gal 6. 6. taught or catechised See Acts 18. 25. Rom. 2. 18. 1 Cor. 14. 19. Catechizing is a plaine and easie instructing of the ignorant in the grounds of Religion or concerning the fundamentall principles familiarly by questions and answers and a spirituall applying the same for practice What ever the catechizing in the Primitive Church was in private for the publique it seems not to have been Dialogue-wise by question and answer but in a continued speech with much plainnesse and familiarnesse Catechizing differs from preaching preaching is the dilating of one member of Religion into a just Treatise catechizing is a contracting of the whole into a summe preaching is to all sorts catechizing to the young and rude Catechizing is 1. plaine that none might excuse themselves that the most illiterate might not say at the day of judgement O Lord thy waies were too hard for us 2 That the manner of the teaching might be sutable to the hearers 3 That no Governours might pretend the difficulty of it 2 Instructing which implyeth that originall ignorance and blindnesse we were borne with 3 It is such an instructing which is by way of distilling things in a familiar manner our
Florentine councell and that of Trent doe approve the said Bookes to be Canonicall as also Augustine and Innocentius To which it may be answered 1. That the Councell of Carthage was but a Provinciall Councell and therefore it cannot binde the whole world Moreover in that Councell there are divers things which the Papists will not endure as in the 26 Canon there is a decree that no Bishop shall be called chiefe or universall Bishop no not the Bishop of Rome how should the Papists binde us with the authority of that Councell with which they will not binde themselves 2. The Latine Fathers judged these bookes fit to be read for example of life and instruction of manners but not for confirmation of faith or establishing any doctrine 3. These Bookes are not Proto Canonicall truely and properly Canonicall inspired by God containing the immediate and unchangeable truth of God sanctified by him and given to the Church to be a perfect rule of sound doctrine and good life but Deutero-canonicall or rather Ecclesiasticall as they are stiled In this sence Augustine and Innocentius are to be taken when they reckon these Bookes among the Canonicall 4. No Councell hath authority to define what Bookes are Canonicall what not seeing Bookes truely Divine receive authority from God himselfe and are to be esteemed of undoubted truth although all the world should barke against them These two Councels are of too late standing to oppose against the other ancient Councels which reject these Bookes The coâ—ncell of Trent was gathered and kept against all Civill and Ecclesiasticall right neither was there any forme of justice observed in it 1. It was not kept in a lawfull place for whereas it was intended against the Protestants and the Germans were the parties accused it ought to have been kept in Germany according to the request exhibited by the body of the States of Germany assembled at Noremberg this equity was not observed the parties accused being called into Italy 2. In that Councell matters were concluded and the sentence passed the adversary not being heard speake nor so much as present for the Protestants might not be admitted to hearing neither could they obtaine to propound their opinion in the Councell muchlesse to avouch it by lawfull reasoning Sleidan fol. 29. and yet were condemned against divine and humane law for they both forbid the condemning of any before he have lawfull liberty granted him to plead for himselfe 3. In that Councell the accuser and Judge were the same for the Pope did accuse the Protestants of heresie he did convocate the Coucell he by his Delegates was President and Moderator in it and so together was Accuser Judge and Witnesse whereas the reformation of the Pope was the thing in question Lastly all Councels ought to be free but in this Protestants might not propound their cause nor defend it neither might any thing be proposed but according to the mind of the Legates or otherwise then they approved no man had any voyce in the Councell but such as were sworne to the Pope nothing was there determined which was not first concluded of at Rome by the Pope in the Colledge of Cardinals and sent from Rome to Trent whereupon this Proverbe arose Spiritum Sanctum Roma pâ—r peram mitti Tridentum The Holy Ghost came to Trent packt up in a Cloke-bag We hope therefore since the Apocrypha are justly rejected out of the Canon that hereafter they will neither have the honour to be bound with our Bibles nor read in our Churches The Apocrypha was never received by the Church of the Israelites before Christ his comming nor of the Apostolicke and Primitive Church for more then 300 yeeres after as both Eusebius out of Origen and the Councell of Laodicea Can. 59. confirmed afterward by the sixth generall councell of Constantinople sheweth for the Greeke Church and St Jerome for the Latine CHAP. VI. Of the Authenticall edition of the Scripture NOw we must enquire which is the Authenticall edition of holy Scriptures it being necessary that this heavenly truth committed to writing should be delivered in some forme of words and in some language which may be understood Lawyers from whom the use of the word Authentique seemeth borrowed doe call those instruments and writings authentique which have a certaine and just authority in themselves A booke or writing is authentique either by divine or humane institution those are by Divine appointment and institution authenticall which have from God sufficient and absolute authority to command and approve themselves worthy credit and faith in as much as God himselfe doth approve thtm by humane institution such writings are held authenticall which by the opinion and sentence of learned men in their severall professions may be esteemed worthy credit and beliefe for themselves and for the truth in them There is a great diversity of editions of holy Scripture all cannot be simply and perpetually authenticall in of and for themselves without reference unto another no more then many draughts of the same Lease or Deed or copy of one pardon can be Some amongst many are authentique whence the others are transcribed yea it cannot be that there should be many but although there may be many counterpanes of the deed yet there is but one or two principall Deeds so amongst this great variety of editions one or more ought to be as principall and authenticall Thrre is a question betwixt the Church of Rome and the reformed Churches about the authentique edition of Scripture they say that the edition of the Bible in Hebrew and Greeke iâ— not authenticall but rather the vulgar Latine We hold that the vulgar Latine is very corrupt and false that the Hebrew for the old Testament and the Greeke for the new is the sincere and authenticall writing of God therefore that all things are to be determined by them and that the other versions are so far to be approved of as they agree with these fountaines The Tridentine Councell thus decreeth that in all sermons readings disputations controversies the vulgar Latine Translation should be taken for authentique before the Hebrew or Greeke and that no man should presume upon any occasion to reject it or to appeale from it When the Councell of Trent saith the vulgar Latine is authenticall it compares it with other Latine Translations not with the Hebrew Muis. Andradius the chiefest of the Divines at the Councell of Trent thinketh that the Councell of Trent did not meane either to condemne the Hebrew truth as he calleth it or to acquit the Latine Translation from all errour when they called it Authenticall but onely that the Latine hath no such errour by which any pestilent opinion in faith and manners may be gathered This saith Rainolds against Hart. ch 6. p. 202. Chamier tomo 1. l. 12. c. 2. The Rhemists in their preface to the new Testament translated by them prolixly
Church 2. We grant that the Apostâ—es living and preaching and the Canon of the New Testament being not yet sealed their Gospell delivered viva voce was no lesse a rule of faith and worship then the writings of Moses and the Prophets 3. We doe not reject all the traditions of the Church for we embrace certaine Historicall and Ceremoniall ones but we deny that opinions of faith or precepts of worship can be confirmed by unwritten traditions 4. We call that an opinion of faith to speake properly and strictly when a Proposition is revealed by God which exceeds the capacity of nature and is propounded to be beleeved as necessary to be knowne to salvation Fundamentall opinions are those which by a usuall and proper name are called Articles of faith 5. What is not in respect of the matter an Article of saith may be a Proposition to be beleeved with a Theologicall faith if you looke to the manner of revealing as that the Sunne is a great light the Moone a lesse Gen. 1. 16. that Rachel was beautifull Leah bleare-eyed The Papists doe not cease to accuse the Scripture of imperfection and insufficiency as not containing all things necessary to salvation The Councell of Trent sess 4. decret 1. Saith that the truth and discipline is contained in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus The Papists generally divide the word of God into the word written and traditions They affirme that there are many things belonging to Christian faith which are neither contained in the Scriptures openly nor secretly This opinion is maintained by the Papists but it was not first invented by them The Jewish Fathers did use the traditions of the Elders and it hath been said of old Marke 7. 5. Matth. 5. 21. for their errours and superstitions yea at length they affirmed firmed that God gave to Moses in mount Sinai the Scripture and the Cabala or a double Law the one written the other unwritten The Tridentine Fathers session 4th doe command Traditions to be received with the same reverend affection and piety with which we embrace the Scripture and because one Bishop in the Councell of Trent refused this he was excluded In the meane space they explaine not what those traditions are which must be so regarded none of them would ever give us a list and Catalogue of those Ordinances which are to be defended by the authority of unwritten traditions not of the word committed to writing onely they affirme in generall whatsoever they teach or doe which is not in the Scripture that it is to be put into the number of Traditions unwritten The cause of it selfe is manifest that at their pleasure they might thrust what they would upon the Church under the name of Traditions Vide Whitak de Script controviae quaest Sexta c. 5. See also Moulins Buckler of Faith p. 51. Lindan the Papist was not ashamed to say that it had been better for the Church if there had been no Scripture at all but onely Traditions For saith he we may doe well enough with Traditions though we had no Scripture but could not doe well enough with Scripture though we had no Traditions Baldwin saith a Testament may be either scriptum or nuncupativum set downe in writing or uttered by word of mouth But a nuncupative Testament or Will made by word of mouth without writing must be proved by solemne witnesses The solemne witnesses of Christs Testament are the Prophets and Apostles Let Papists if they can prove by them that part of the Testament of Christ is unwritten Because our Adversaries doe contend for Traditions not written hotly and zealously against the totall perfection of the Scripture that they might thrust upon us many points by their owne confession not contained in Scripture and usurpe to themselves irrefragable authority in the Church it shall not be amisse largely to consider of this matter And 1. to enquire of the signification of the words Greek and Latine which are translated Tradition and then to come to the matter which is controverted between us and the Papists The Greeke word signifying Tradition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in the new Testament is used only in these places Matth. 15. 2. 3. 6. Marke 7. 3. 5. 8. 9. 13. 1 Cor. 11. 2. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 8. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and in the vulgar Latine is rendred Traditio Matth. 15. 2. 3. 6. Marke 7. 3. 5. 8. 9. 13. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 6. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and praecepta 1 Cor. 11. 2. Whereto the Rhemists translation which seemeth to be but a bare translation of the vulgar Latine doth wholly agree using the word Tradition every where excepting 1 Cor. 11. 2. where they use the word precepts but set in the margent the word Tradition Arias Montanus in his Interlineall translation doth render it traditio Beza doth commonly expresse it by the word traditio In the English Geneva Bible we translate it by the word instruction tradition calling mens precepts traditions the Apostles doctrine Ordinances or instructions not that we feared the word tradition but because we would not have the simple deceived as though the unwritten verities of the papists were thereby commended or as though we had some honourable conceite of them and what we did herein the signification of the word doth give us free liberty to doe in our last English Translation we use the word tradition as often as the vulgar Latine or the Rhemists have done not that we were driven by feare or shame to alter what was done before but because we would cut off all occasion of carping at our translation though never so unjust First we contend not about the name tradition the word may lawfully be used if the sense affixed thereto be lawfull 2. All traditions unwritten are not simply condemned by us 3. The Apostles delivered by lively voyce many observations dispensable and alterable according to the circumstances of time and persons appertaining to order and comelinesse onely we say that they were not of the substance of Religion that they were not generall concerning all Churches 4. We receive the number and names of the authors of Books Divine and Canonicall as delivered by tradition but the Divine truth of those Books is in it self clear and evident unto us not depending on the Churches authority The Books of Scripture have not their authority quoad nos from the approbation of the Church but winne credit of themselves and yeeld sufficient satisfaction to all men of their divine truth whence we judge the Church that receiveth them to be led by the Spirit of God yet the number authors and integrity of the parts of those Books we receive as delivered by tradition 5. The continued practise of such things as are neither expressely contained in Scripture nor the example of such practise expressely there delivered though the grounds reasons and cause of the necessity of such practise be
time of Austin fasting on the Sabbath day which was kept only at Rome Necessary Traditions which are delivered in the forme of a Precept that Easter is to bee celebrated on the Lords Day Free which are delivered in the forme of counsell as sprinkling of holy water Objection The Scripture it not perfect with a perfection of parts because many parts are either defective or excessive 1. Some labour wiâ—h a defect as Genesis 11. 12. a person is omitted in the Genealogy of Cainaan which was the Sonne of Aphâ—xad but it is reckoned in Luke in Christs Genealogy not in the old Testament therefore there is a defect Sol. Luke reckons it according to the vulgar opinion of the Jewes Junius in his paralels would have the fault to be in the Septuagint whom Luke followed not approving of their errour but yeelding to the time least the Gospell otherwise should have beene prejudicâ—d but Bezas opinion is rather to be approved of that this word is inserted from the Ignorance of those who undertooke to correct this Text according to the translation of the Seventy Interpreters For in an Ancient manuscript which Beza followed this word Cainaan was not to be found therefore he omitted it in his translation and so hath our great English Bible Ob. There is something found in the Scripture against the Commandement of God Deut. 4. 2. therefore there is excesse as well as defect for many Bookes which we beleeve to be Canonicall are added Sol. He doth not forbid adding by Gods Command but from the will of man for God himselfe added afterward The Papists arguments for Traditions answered Ob. Bellarmine saith Religion was preserved for 2000 yeares from Adam to Moses onely by Tradition therefore the Scripture is not simply necessary Sol. By the like reason I might argue that Religion was long preserved not onely without the Pope of Rome but also without Baptisme and the Lords Supper with the like institutions therefore they are not simply necessary yet none of ours hold the Scriptures simply necessary Secondly it is false that Religion was preserved all that while by ordinary Tradition onely for the living voyce of God sounded most perpetually in the Church and the doctrine of Religion was conveighed successivly from the Father to the Sonne which living voyce of God by little and little ceasing writing afterward succeeded and hath the same necessity now which Gods living voyce had before Ob. Whatsoever things are commended from Scripture are necessary but so are Traditions ergo they are necessary Joh 16. 12. I have yet many things to say unto you but ye cannot beare them now therefore say they the Lord spake many things which are not written Sol. 1. He saith not that he had many things to tell them which he had not taught them before but which they were not now so well capable of for it appeareth that he taught them that which they understood not and therefore they needed to be further taught of them by the holy Ghost which should not teach them any new thing that Christ had not taught but onely make them understand that which they had beene taught of our Saviour Christ. 2. If the holy Ghost did teach them any thing which our Saviour Christ had not before spoke unto them of yet that makes nothing for Traditions seeing that which the holy spirit taught them he taught them out of the Scriptures 3. If the holy Ghost should have taught the Apostles some things which neither Christ had told them of nor the Scriptures had taught them yet this is rather against the Papists For that which the holy Ghost taught them they undoubtedly left in record unto the Church as being faithfull Stewards and revealing the whole Counsell of God unto the people 4. It hath been the practise of Hereticks as Austine affirmeth at all times to cover their dreames and phantasies with this sentence of our Saviour Christ. Lastly if it be asked what were those grave and great mysteries which the Apostles could not for their rudenesse beare they are forsooth Oyle and Spittle in Baptisme Candles light at noone dayes which was not in the darker time of the Law Baptizing of Bels and such like gue-gaws as the grossest and carnallest men are fittest to receive Ob. 2 Thess. 2. 15. Therefore Brethren stand fast and hold the Traditions which ye have been taught whether by word or our Epistle From these words say our Adversaries it appeares that all things were not written nullum Papistae in Scripturis locum probabiliorem inveniunt saith Whitaker The Hereticks say the Rhemists on this place purposely guilefully and of ill conscience refraine in their translations from the Ecclesiasticall and most usuall word Tradition evermore when it is taken in good part though it expresse most exactly the signification of the Greeke word but when it â—oundeth in their fond fantasie againâ—â— the Traditions of the Church as indeed in true sense it never doth there they use it most gladly Here therefore and in the like plâ—ces that the reader may not so easily like of Traditions unwritten here commended by the Apostle they translate 〈◊〉 â—onstitutions Ordinances and what they can invent else to hide the truth from the Rimple or unwarry Reader whose translations have none other end but to be guile such by art and conveighance Thus farre the Rhemists Paul taught the Thessalonians some things by word of mouth which he taught them not in his two Epistles which he wrote unto them therefore he taught some doctrines which he wrote not as if that Paul wrote no more Epistles then these two whereby that which he taught not them in writing unto them he taught them by writing unto others Secondly how followeth this argument Paul wrote not all the doctrines of God unto the Thessalonians therefore they are not all written in the Propheticall and Evangelicall writings whereas it is plainly testified that the Old Testament containeth a perfect rule of the doctrine of salvation the new being written for a Declaration of the fulfilling and further clearing of that in the Old Testament Thirdly it appeareth manifestly in the Acts what was the summe of that which Paul taught the Thessalonians by word of mouth For there it is witnessed that Paul taught out of the Scriptures that it behoved Christ to suffer and rise againe from the dead and that Jesus was Christ this teaching then by word is there limited to the Scriptures of the Law and Prophets Neither ought it to seeme strange that this was the summe of all which the Apostle taught at Thessalonica where he tarried so small a while when amongst the Corinthians where he remained longest of any place and consequently taught most he sheweth that he taught nothing but Christ and him crucified Fourthly the Apostle himself in this very place calling verse 14. whatsoever he taught by word or wrote by the name of