a fountaine incorrupted a Doctour among the Interpreters of Scripture as a Sunne among Planets as the greatest of the Fathers the worthiest Deuine that euer Gods Church had This great Doctour and Saint sayth Heresies haue no other origen then this that euery Heretike prefers his owne opinion drawne from his owne proper spirit before the commō opinion of the Church Againe Nothing makes them Heretiks but this that misvnderstanding the Scriptures they obstinatly defend their owne opinions The holy Scripture is dangerous to these who will wrest it to their owne peruerse hart who whē they ought to liue according to the will of God they liue according to their owne will and they will haue that to be the meaning of Scripture which is their owne when that which is the Scriptures ought to be theirs Againe Thy truth O Lord is neyther myne nor this mans or that mans but all mens whom thou callest publickly to the communiō of it and whereby thou dost terribly admonish vs that we seeke not to haue truth priuate least we be depriued of it for whosoeuer doth challenge to himselfe that which thou dost propose to be enioyed by all and will make that proper to himselfe which is common to all that man is driuen from the common to his owne proper that is from truth to falsehood Wherupō he reprehends the Pelagians because they vnderstood the Scripturs according to their own priuate sense the Donatists because eyther by too much louing their owne opinion or enuying their betters they went so farre vpon their diabolicall presumption as sacrilegiously to separate holy communion and bring in schisme or heresy and the Manichies You see that your worke is to take away all authority from Scripture and make euery mans mind and conceit authour of what is to be belieued or not to be belieued in holy Scripture that is that you will not subiect your selues to Scripture but will make Scripture subiect to your selues Thus doth S. Augustine condemne this spirit for that it doth prefer it selfe and owne opinion before the commō iudgement of the Church doth falsely interprete Scripture doth draw the meaning of Scripture to its owne wil yea the will of God to the same And he condemnes the Pelagians Donatists and Manichies for that by it they expounded Scripture and deuided themselues from the communion of holy Church With S. Augustine agrees Cyrill of Alexandria Heretikes should do well if they would seeke the true sense of Scripture and not turne all according to their owne will And with them both Vincentius Lyrinensis If any would seems a Prophet or Maister that is maister of spirituall thinges let him chiefly desire vnity and equality that is that he do not prefer his owne opinion before others nor doe departe from the generall opinions of all men Because all doe not take the holy Scripture in one and the same sense some do interprete one way others another way the same sentences so that as many senses are made as there be men Therefore it is very necessary by reason of many turninges and windinges of errours that the line of Catholicall and Apostolicall interpretation be directed according to the rule of the Ecclesiasticall and Catholike sense Heere is aduise giuen not to wrest all to our owne liking and spirit but to keep vnity and direct the interpretation of Scripture according to the rule of Catholike sense After all these Venerable Beda the honour of our Nation in the eight age sayth As the Prophets did write deliuer and speake not their owne wordes but the wordes of God so also the Reader of them must not vse his owne proper interpretation least he decline from the sense of the truth Therfore we affirme that no man presume to expound Scriptures according to his owne pleasure What more plaine I will adde to these the testimonyes of Luther and Caluin vttered in confutation of others but against themselues Luther x speaking against Swenkfeldius sayth It must not trouble vs that some do glorify of the spirit and little esteeme the Scriptures But sayth Luther good friend the spirit goes this way that way I also was in spirit and haue seene spirits if I may glory of my owne perhaps more then they shall see in a yeare and my spirit doth shew it selfe in something where theirs is yet in a corner Note that the Swenkfeldians and the Caluinists agree in that both of them rely on the Spirit and make it the ground of their Fayth they differ in that the former refuse scripture and rely only on the spirit these later admit scripture but both for canon and sense of it subiect it to their spirit so that the spirit in the one reiects scripture in the other it censures and Lordes it ouer scripture Whether is worse let any be iudge Caluin also speaking of the same Swenkfeldians sayth If that spirit was good it would be the same with the spirit of the Apostles and ancient faythfull people but their spirit would not be iudg without scripture so say we If Caluins or the Caluinist spirit were true it would be the same with the spirit of the ancient Church and Fathers Also against the Vbiquitarians he sayth Satan hath bewitched their mindes with horrible witchery c. And Satan by turbulent spirits doth endeauour c. Mans hart hath so many secret places of vanity is subiect to so many holes of lyes is couered with so much fraudulent hypocrisie that it often deceaues it selfe Againe Many false Doctours belye or counterfeite the title of the spirit many mad men start vp who rashely make ostentation that they are endued with the spirit of God They are fooles who amazed at the honourable title of the spirit dare not enquire after the matter it selfe Many braggo of the spirit yet speake in their owne priuate name goe out in their owne name vtter out of their owne sense Thus do these Patrons practisers of this priuate spirit wound themselues in thus stabbing the same in their aduersaries For what they affirme against them is verified against themselues But what can these Spiritualists as we may call them say to all these testimonies of Fathers Or rather what shall we say to them about the same I conceaue nothing can be sayd better then that which S. Augustine in the like case of originall sinne sayth against the like Heretikes the Pelagians for hauing cyted most of the Doctours before his tyme both of the Greeke and Latin Church as Irenaeus Athanasius Cyrill Nazianzen Chrysostome Basil Olympius Reticius fourteene more whose workes are not now extant as Eulogius Ioannes Ammonianus Porphyrius Fidus Zozimus Zoboenus Nimphidius Cromatius Iouinus Eleutherius Clematius all greeke Doctours and Cyprian Hilary Ambrose Innocentius yea Hierome of his owne tyme all Doctours of the Latin Church and all to proue originall sinne and
who receaue both the old and new Testament but interpreted according to Mahomets Alcaron and also by all Heretiks who seek to fill their books not oÌ„ly with words of Scripture but sayth Vincent Lyrin with thousands of testimonies thousands of examples thousands of authorityes out of the Law the Psalmes the Prophets the Apostles which expounded after a new and ill manner would thereby throw downe soules from the tower of Catholike fayth to the pit of wicked heresy being as our Sauiour sayth of them false Prophets or teachers who vnder the garments of sheep that is sayth Vincent Lyrin the wordes of the Prophets and Apostles are rauenous VVolues infesting the fold of the Church and deuouring the flocke of Christ and saying Christ is heere or there that is as Origen expounded it in this or that text of Scripture who thus transfiguring themselues into the shew of Apostles or preachers of Christ do labour to transfer the people into another Ghospell who depraue the Scripture to their owne and others destruction And by the wordes of the Law sayth S. Ambrose impugne the Law and do frame a false sense of the wordes of the Law that they may confirme their owne peruerse opinions by the authority of the Law Against al whome we may note the wordes of S. Hilary saying That Heresy is about the vnderstanding not the text of Scripture the sense not the words is the sinne And of S. Hierome That the Ghospell is not in the wordes but the sense of scripture not in the outward rine but in the inward marrow not in the leaues of wordes but in the root of the sense SVBDIV. 2. Who haue authority to make the Interpretation of Scripture SEcondly this sense and meaning of scripture because it is not facil and easy to be knowne to all by reason of the great obscurity in the wordes the great fecundity in the sense and the great profundity in the mysteries or articles belieued which cannot by euery one nor by any one without the assistance of the same spirit which penned it be vnderstood therfore is necessary some authentical certain and infallible authority for the true vnderstanding of this authenticall certaine and infallible sense of scripture This authority because it is in the Catholike Church chiefly in the Pastours and Prelates of the same for the better gouernement of it in true doctrine vpon whom God hath bestowed the infallible assistance of his holy spirit as is afterward proued therfore their authority is necessary for the finding out the true and certaine sense of scripture Whensoeuer therfore the chiefe Pastour or Pastours of the Church vsing the meanes for it appointed of which in the next proposition do either ex Cathedra or in a Councell confirmed approued or by a generall consent propose deliuer and declare any sense or exposition of scripture as true and to be belieued as an article of faith in any controuersy against heretikes then is that sense to be receaued for their authority as authenticall certaine and infallible From whence ensues that though in matters of Philosophy and reason we must rather attend what is said theÌ„ by whome it is said and respect rather the force then the authority of the person who sayes it yet in matters of faith we must first respect them who preach and the authority and commission of their person and by it iudge of their doctrine preached For if the person be lawfully sent if he haue lawfull commission if he be a lawfull pastour not deuided by heresy or schisme from the whole body then the people are to attend to him and for his commission to receaue his doctrine but if he want mission commissioÌ„ if he teach of himselfe and his owne authority if he produce the doctrine not of the Church-proposition but of his owne inuention let him teach what he wil proue it how he wil he is not to be heard nor belieued by the common and vulgar people to whom it belonges to be obedient subiect to the authority of their Pastour not to iudge of the verity of his doctrine more then in generall whether it be consonant or dissonant from the vniuersally receaued doctrine of the Church for they are to obey their Pastours to remaine in the same rule in the faith first deliuered in that which they heard from the beginning to auoid profane nouelties of words not to receiue any other Ghospel or doctrine but that which they learned and receaued from the beginning leauing the particulars to the testimony of others either equal to their pastour in function or superiour to him in authority Which point is to be noted against the Manichees of old and the Protestants of late who respect not the authority of the Preacher but the force of his reason attend not to the commission of the Pastour who he is that teacheth but to the plausibility of his doctrine what it is and how far it is pleasing to their priuat spirit disposition or iudgment SVBDIV. 3. What meanes are to be vsed to make this Interpretation and of foure Rules of infallible interpreting of scripture Thirdly The meanes which are to be obserued vsed and followed by these Pastours or Prelats for the securing vs of this true sense of scripture are these 1. The rule of faith that is the Catholike and vniuersally receiued doctrine of faith and piety which was deliuered by the Apostles receiued by posterity 2. The generall practise or obseruatioÌ„ custome or tradition of the whole Church in pointes where the doctrine is not certaine 3. The auncient exposition or consent of the holy fathers and doctours of the primitiue Church where the former do not appeare 4. The decrees and definitions of the Councels either generall or prouincial approued by generall and the conformity to them in all expositions doubtfull Thâ—se are as so many rules or conducts according to which the certaine and authenticall sense of scripture is by the Pastours of gods Church to be squared and guided First that the rule of fayth is to be presupposed obserued and followed in the finding out the true sense of scripture is proued 1. This rule of Fayth is by S. Paul who often doth mention it called sometymes a rule which bringeth peace VVho haue followed this rule peace be on them Sometimes a rule in which they are to remaine to auoid dissentions Let vs remaine in the same rule that we may iudge the same Sometymes his rule which he deliuered to them and by which they are to increase in fayth Your fayth increasing according to our rule Sometymes a reason of Fayth according to which is giuen the guift of prophesy or interpretation of scripture Donations or prophesy according to the rule of Fayth And in effect it is no other but the doctrine they receaued the fayth preached through the whole world the disposition
S. Augustine affirme the Bishops of Palestine to haue expounded that of Rom. 5. in whome all sinned of originall sinne deriued from Adam by propagation not imitation only By this same practise of the Church praying for the conuersion of Infidels and perseuerance of the faythfull did he proue against the same Pelagians grace of predestination and perseuerance By the same practise did he reconcile those places of Scripture of eating all that is set before vs and of not eating with sinners And to omit many other by the same practise of the Church not rebaptizing them baptized by Heretikes did he refuse to adhere to S. Cyprian and his opinion and confuted him and all the Bishops of Africa Cappadocia Bythinia and the rest who maintained the contrary And to conclude by this practise which he had learned publikly Eusebius did also alleadge Iustinus Miltiades Tatian Clemens Irenaeus Meliton and others against Artemon The same that did these Fathers did also the generall Councels The first Councell of Nice by the testimonyes which they had from the Fathers witnes Athanasius did decree against Arius The Councell of Ephesus following the confessions of the Fathers sayth it selfe and alleadging sayth Vincent Lyr. in particuler Most of the East and VVest Doctours as Maisters Confessours witnesses Iudges held their doctrine followed their counsell belieued their testimony obeyed their iudgment and so pronounced their sentence of fayth against Nestorius The Councell of Calcedon following sayth it selfe the holy Fathers the faith of the Fathers the exposition of the Fathers doth determine what is pious and Catholike fayth against Eutiches The sixth generall Councell witnesse both the letters of Pope Agatho and the Synode it selfe doth produce the testimonyes of Fathers for the exposition of scripture and thereby condemned the Monothelites The seauenth generall Councell and the second of Nice doth the same witnesse the letters of Pope Adrian against the Image-breakers And the Councell of Vienna witnesse the letters of Pope Clement in their definitions So that all antiquity whether in priuate disputations or in publike definitions hath alwayes vsed the testimony of Fathers as a meane in declaring the authenticall sense of scripture against Heretikes The fourth and most infallible meane of expounding the Scripture is a Councell either generall or prouinciall confirmed by a generall in which whatsoeuer is not obiter by the way nor as a proofe only but on set purose and as a conclusion or definition deliuered and defined that is without all question or examination to be receaued as a certaine infallible and authenticall sense of scripture Which to omit all testimonies before cyted for the authority of Councels is proued by the practise of the faythfull in all Councels for in the Nicen Councell were many places of scriptures for proofe of the consubstantiality of Christ produced and discussed and the Orthodoxe Fathers vrged and pressed diuers Texts of the same The Arians answered and interpreted them and vrged likwise many against the same The conclusion was the Fathers of the Councell preuailed and concluded both the doctrine of Christs diuinity the sense of the places of Scripture alleadged for it This definition was to all posterity so forcible that though the Arians vsed all force of temporall power which afterward was wholy for them though they summoned as Athanasius saith aboue ten Coūcels or Conuenticles against that one though they sought in a Councell at Hierusalem to restore their Bishops deposed and in a Councell at Antioch to bring in a new forme of faith couched in words not vnlike to the Nicene forme and in a Councell at Smirna did affirme craftily the Sonne to haue beene before his mother and before all times and not a creature like to others though in the Councell at Ariminum they deceaued many Catholicke Bishops and cunningly obtruded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like substance for the same substance which in greek differed only in a letter though they sent Legates into Italy France and al places with faire shewes and promises of vnion of subscribing and of submitting themselues but cunningly and disemblingly as the Protestants did at the first and chiefly Melanchton Bucer about Transubstantiation yet to all posterity and succeeding ages those places of scripture haue euer beene receaued and beleiued in that sense which the Councell then interpreted and vrged them so that that Councel hath beene a rule euer since for the exposition of them to all faithfull and true belieuers in Christ In like manner in the Councell of Ephesus hauing discussed diuers places before controuerted whether they were spoken of the natures or persons of Christ resolued that they were to be vnderstood of plurality of natures not persons in Christ And though Nestorius the eloquent Patriarch of Constantinople and many Bishops with him withstood the Councell and though Theodoret the most learned Catholicke Bishop of that age long opposed S. Cyrill about the same yet the authority of the Councell so far preuailed both then and euer since that all faithfull euer after haue alwayes receaued expounded them in the same sense as true and condemned the contrary as false And the like might be produced of other places for the humanity of Christ against the Manichees and Apollinarists For his two natures against the Eutichians and Monothelites For the holy Ghost against the Macedonians Eunomians And so for transubstantiation against Berengarius and the Sacramentaries which for breuity are omitted And thus much of these foure rules or meanes to wit 1. The rule of Faith 2. The practise of the Church 3. The consent of Fathers and 4. The decrees of Councels by which the Pastours and Prelates of Gods Church are to be directed and vpon which we may infallibly rely for any true certaine authenticall infallible sense of scripture There be other helps which are good and profitable as the consideration of the antecedents and consequences of places the conference of one place with another the obseruation of Scripture-phrases and the skill examination of the originall texts but because they are neither certaine nor infallible but only probable yea often doubtfull and somtimes deceitfull nor yet proper and peculiar to Christians but cōmon to Iewes Pagans Heretiks and all sortes and also not to our purpose for the present therfore we will omit them and shew that the priuate spirit which the Protestants most insist vpon and which we vndertake to confute neither is nor can be any certaine and infallible meanes of interpreting scripture as they do both in doctrine and pactise mantaine That the priuate spirit cannot haue this infallible authority and be this infallible meanes SECT II. THESE being supposed for the finding out the authority certaine and meanes necessary for true interpretation of holy scripture it remaines to be proued that the priuate spirit of euery particular man neither hath in it any certainty or authority nor yet
oecumenicall Councels all of impartiall and authenticall authority which they do not And by this Catholiques are more secure of the true sense of scripture then they haue their faith better grounded vpon the scripture then they and haue their spirit better warranted by God more secured that it is from God and surer combined with the spirit of the auncient Catholicke and Apostolicke Church with the spirit of the holy and learned Doctours and Saintes of God with the spirit of the generall and receiued Councels of Gods Church none of which they haue And by this we haue our beliefe grounded vpon a certaine infallible authenticall sense of scripture which they haue not And thus much of this priuate spirit that it cannot be a fit and certaine Rule or meanes truly and infallibly to interprete the holy scripture THE PRIVATE SPIRITS AVTHORITY To iudge Controuersies of Fayth confuted by Reasons drawne from the nature of a Iudge of Fayth CHAP. VI. The properties of a Iudge of Fayth SECT I. THOVGH the Iudge of the sense of Scripture and of controuersies of faith be all one and therfore that which hath beene spoken of the one might also suffice for the other yet because faith extends it selfe larger then the scripture because the true Iudge of faith from the false may be the more clearly discerned the functiōs of this priuate spirit may be also more plainly confuted therfore I adde in this Chaprer these reasons drawne from the office of a Iudge of Controuersies to shew the insufficiency of this spirit to be a iudge of thē In which we may note for this iudiciary power and authority 1. What it is and what properties and conditions it requires 2. In whome it is and who are to exercise this authority 3. How it is to be ordered and what rules are to be followed in the exercise of it which being distinctly and fully considered the inability and insufficiency of this spirit to make a Iudge of faith will more clearly appeare First therfore we may note that as in a temporall Common-wealth where contentions arise offences are committed and tittles are questionable that besides the lawes established there are necessary also Iudges to determine causes to decide titles and to punish offences so also in the spirituall Common-wealth of the Church where controuersies are of a higher nature questions no fewer in number and the offences more grieuous in quality some personall Iudge or iudges are no lesse yea more necessary to discerne verity in all doubts to establish vnity in all contentions and to punish obstinacy in persons who offend Some Iudge therfore is necessary as well in spirituall causes as in temporall as well for matters of doctrine as of iustice and as well in pointes of faith as of manners This Iudge because all faithfull belieuers are obliged to belieue and obey his sentence as true and iust though not in consequences appendixes of faith yet in materiall and substantiall foundatitions of faith though not in schoole questions pulpit conceites which infringe not the solidity of faith yet in maine articles and principall mysteries of faith vpon which is cōposed a complet edifice of true religion though not in probations and allegations for the proofe of pointes of faith yet in the determinations and conclusions of the points or articles themselues though not in case when is intended only to confirme the weake to satisfy the curious or to confound the proud yet in case when is intended to condemne any doctrine as heresy vnder anathema and to declare and define expresly for the common and publicke good of the whole Church any verity of doctrine formerly by the practise of the Church receaued or by the assent of the faithfull at the least virtually belieued Because I say all faithfull are obliged to belieue and obey this Iudge and his sentence in pointes and articles substantiall defined and concluded by sentence definitiue against heresy for the good of the whole Church therfore it is necessary that this Iudge vpon whome depends the verity of beliefe and the saluation or damnation of so many who by a true or false faith are saued or damned haue these properties or conditions in him in his authority 1. That he be visible and manifest in person so that he may know and be knowne heare and be heard speake and be spoken vnto and therby haue a publicke Court giue publick audience examine publicke causes pronounce publicke sentence betweene parties who contend and in contentions which are debated 2. That he haue power and authority warrant and commission to giue Iudgment pronounce sentence and to compell parties to obedience and performance 3. That he haue warrant of infallibility in this his sentence that he cannot erre or determine errour deceaue or be deceaued in this his verdit corrupt or be corrupted by partiality in his iudgment All which are as it were essentially necessary for this iudge for if he be not publicke knowne in person others cannot haue accesse to him nor he vnderstand the causes of others if he be not certaine and infallible in his sentence he cannot determine matters of certainty nor can others be secured by him if he want authority and power to oblige and compell he cannot end the controuersy and establish peace and vnity in the Church which is the end of his iudgment Further because this Iudge is to haue this infallible authority and that all are obliged to rely vpon him and his iudgment that he may the more securly proceed in his iudgment and others more confidently rely vpon it therfore he must haue some Rule likwise infallible and certaine by which he may be directed in his iudgment and some solid foundation vpon which he may build his definitiue sentence This rule or foundation because it is to be a rule ground of iudgment and that for persons in number so infinit and for causes in substance so important therfore it can require no lesse then these and such like properties for the solidity of it and the security of iudgment by it In respect of it selfe 1. That it be so certaine infallible that it can neither deceaue or be deceaued 2. That it be so continued and not interrupted that it cannot decay or perish 3. That it be so firme and immutable that it cannot be changed or corrupted In respect of the persons whom it is to direct 4. That it be so knowne and visible that it may be discerned by all sortes who haue need of it 5. So markable notable that it may be a signe distinctiue to distinguish true from false beleeuers 6. So necessary and important that without it no certainty can be had 7. So vniuersal general that it may satisfy all sortes of people Iewes or Infidels Heretikes or Catholikes yong or old vnlearned or learned In respect of the matter or mysteries which are to be determined 8. That it be so fundamentall that
this preaching is deriued frō Mission according to that of S. Paul How shal they belieue him whom they haue not heard how shall they heare without a preacher how shall they preach except they be sent So that faith it by hearing hearing is by preaching of Pastours and preaching is by mission from the authority of Superiours Of which the reason is because faith is an argumēt or proofe of things that do not appeare either to our sense or reason but are aboue our vnderstanding and capacity therfore we cannot attaine to it by euidence of reason but by credit of authority To this authority that we may giue credit we must conceaue and heare it this hearing that we may be obliged to accept it must by Church-Pastors be proposed and preached to vs and this preaching that it may the better secure vs of it must be from lawfull mission by ordinary succession deriued and so lawfull mission from apostolical authority infallible preaching or proposition of Pastours and a pious disposition in vs to heare and belieue what is thus proposed are the meanes by which according to S. Paul true faith is attained But this priuat spirit quite ouerthrowes all this excellēt order and subordination ordayned by Christ Iesus proposed to vs by the holy Ghost For first it alone without any disposition of hearing without any proposition or preaching of Church Pastours without any authority of apostolicall mission and ordination teaches and directs in particuler euery one man woman or child which is true Scripture which is true sense of it and which is true doctrine collected out of it therfore euery one thus made faithfull by this spirit stands need neither of disposition to heare what is to be belieued nor of preaching to belieue what they heare nor of mission and ordination to secure them of what is preached because this spirit supplies the effect of all both ordination proposition and disposition of hearing therfore all order and discipline all subordination and subiection all sacraments or preaching are needlesse yea fruitlesse in Gods Church As this spirit secures alone so without Sacraments it sanctifies alone As it instructs all in faith so it corrects all in errours against faith And as it is directed by none but God so it is subordinate to none but God alone obliged to none obedient to none it is immediate as they which haue it imagine from God it wil be subiect only to God it will be directed only by God it alone inspires all what they are to belieue alone works all what they are to do and alone secures all that they cannot faile of their end and saluation and so alone to all is all in all that is the beginning progresse and end of all grace and goodnesse Thus is the spirit to them if you will credit them Secondly It alone hath warrant and commission power and authority in whomsoeuer it is whether he be yonge or old simple or wise vnlearned or learned secular or spirituall to examine censure to giue sentence and iudgment in any cause or Controuersy ouer any Pastour or Prelate vpon any Councell or Church particuler or generall present or past late or auncient For as Caluin and Kemnitius for example by the prerogatiue of this their spirit tooke vpon them to censure and correct by their Examine and Antidote not only the late generall Councel of Trent but also the auncient generall Councels of Nice Constantinople Chalcedon and Ephesus yea the whole Church of God and all Doctours in it for many ages togeather as is before shewed so euery bible-bearing Ghospeller who hath got but a tast of this spirit and can but read the Scripture in English will by the same prerogatiue of this spirit assume to himselfe the same authority to examine the same examiners to censure the same censurers and to iudge the spirit of the former iudges yea to examine censure and iudge all Pastours Doctours Fathers Councells and Churches and to determine which of them haue erred what sense of Scripture is to be preferred and what Fayth and Religion is to be imbraced All which as these new Protestant Maisters first practised vpon the ancient Fathers so these their new discipls haue learned to practise the same vpon them their maisters and do as well censure them as they did their Predecessours and that worthily for what they taught and practised against their Fathers is a iust punishment that their children should learne and practise the same against them That it cannot be a meanes of fayth which requirs credible testimonies SECT VI. FIFTHLY this fayth as it is obtained by piously hearing the infallible preaching of Pastours lawfully ordained and sent so also it requires besides diuine reuelation reasons and motiues of credibility forcible to moue the Vnderstanding to accept as probable this doctrine of Fayth thus by preaching proposed and by God reuealed for as before He that giueth credit quickly is light of hart And reasons of credibility such as are miracles sanctity vnity conuersions of Nations and such like before mentioned doe make a true fayth more credible according to that of Dauid Thy testimonies are made too credible But that this priuate spirit cannot giue any such credible testimonies or produce any probable motiue to conuince any one that it is a true spirit of God or a certaine meanes of faith is proued Because it cannot alledge any consent of people and nations nor any authority of miracles to vse S. Augustines words nourished by hope increased by charity and confirmed by antiquity such as confirmed S. Augustine in his faith it cannot alleadge any vnity which it causeth either with the head Christ or with his body the Church not any sanctity which it worketh by works memorable for piety or miraculous for power and vertue not any consent of vniuersality by which it hath been imbraced in all places at all times by all nations and persons no not in ancient time by any persons renowned for holinesse and learning not any succession of Pastours prelates doctours or saints who haue relied themselues their faith saluation vpon it it cannot produce any one euident either authority of holy scripture or any one tradition of apostolicall time or any one practise of auncient Church or any one decree of generall Councels or any one testimony of learned Doctours or any one probable much lesse conuincing argument of reason that either all or any one man must or may settle his beliefe in it interprete the Scripture by it rely his saluation vpon it deduce all resolutions of fayth all questions of Controuersies all doubts of Religion from it and giue peremptory iudgment and sentence of all Pastours and Prelates of all Saints and Doctours of all Churches and Councells of all doctrine and religion according to the suggestion of it which yet the precise Protestāts do both in doctrine professe and in practise performe That it cannot be a
knowne after the thing to be proued All which inconueniences this Circular manner of probation doth inferre making the probation either the same or equally or more obscure then the thing to be proued 2. Because it would follow that idem should be prius posterius notius ignotius respectu eiusdem knowne vnknowne first knowne and after knowne in respect of the same As when the premises do demonstrate the conclusion they must be first and better knowne then the Conclâ—sion And againe when the conclusion doth demonstrate the premises it should be first and better knowne then the premises so the same conclusion shal be prius notius as demonstrating the premises and posterius ignotius as demonstrated and proued by the premises both being vnderstood of the same premises 3. Because this Circular proofe is to proue the same to be the same because it is the same as the conclusion to be true if it be true or because it is true As saith Aristotle Si A est B est si B est A est ergo si A est A est In which as A is proued to be A because it is A so the conclusion is proued to be true because it is true Whereupon Aristotle concludes that euery Circular proofe and demonstration which is regressus ab eodem ad omnino idem that is when we returne froÌ„ one thing to the same thing againe and from one proofe to the same proofe againe is vitious and vnlawfull in Logicke And thus much of the nature of a Circle Secondly for the difference betweene a proper Circle which is bad and an improper which is good and lawfull we may note also that euery kind of Circular and reciprocall proofe is not vnlawfull for some is reciprocall betweene the cause and the effect as betweene rationale and risibile betweene the Sunne the Day And thus may be proued the effect by the cause à priori as Est risibile quia est rationale est dies quia Sol lucet or on the contrary the cause by the effect à posteriori as Est rationale quia est risibile or Sol lucet quia est dies Other proofes are reciprocall betweene two causes of diuers kindes as betweene the efficient cause and the finall in which sense we proue Phisicke to be good because as the efficient cause it causeth and worketh health and health to be good because as the finall cause or end it moueth to take Phisicke Or betweene the efficient and materiall cause as when we proue the entrance of the wind to be the cause that is efficient of opening the window and the opening of the window to be the cause that is materiall of the entrance of the wind Or when we proue the aboundance of raine by the aboundance of vapours as by the materiall cause and the aboundance of vapours by the aboundance of raine as by the effect All which kind of reciprocall or Circular proofe of the cause by the effect and the effect by the cause or of one cause by another is good and allowed in Logicke as being improperly a Circle Only that which is disallowed and by Aristotle all condemned is that proper manner of Circle which is 1. when in the same kind of cause one thing is proued by another and this againe by the former which is either idem per idem or ignotum per ignotius 2. When this reciprocall proofe is made by one and the same cause in one and the same manner of proofe 3. When to one and the selfe same person this one thing is thus proued by another and this againe by the former the one mutually prouing the other as when the premises demonstrate the conclusion and the conclusion againe the premises both being otherwise vnknowne As when the maister proues the seruant to be innocent and the seruant the maister both being before suspected as guilty In which the same thing is notius ignotius prius posterius that is more knowne and lesse knowne first knowne and after knowne both in one and the same respect and in respect of one and the same person and so a thing vnknowne is proued by another more vnknowne which is that vnlawfull Circle or Circular manner of demonstration disallowed and condemned by Aristotle By which is manifest what a Circular proofe is and of Circular manners of proofes which is improper lawfull and which proper and vnlawfull Thirdly Both Catholicks and Protestantes do mutually accuse one another of this vicious and Circular arguing and manner of proofe The Protestants accuse the Catholicks because they proue the authority of the scripture by the authority of the Church and the authority of the Church by the authority of scripture For aske a Catholicke how he knowes the Scripture to be infallible and true he will answer because the Church tels him it is so aske him how he proues the Church to be infallible and true he wil answer because the scripture sayes it is so and so he proues the Scripture by the Church and the Church by the Scripture The Catholicks accuse the Protestants because they proue the scripture by the spirit and the spirit by the scripture for aske a Protestant how he knowes the scripture to be true and the true sense of it he answers because the spirit so tels and assures him aske him how he knowes the spirit that it is of God and speakes truth he answers because the scripture tels and assures him so and so he knowes the Scripture by the spirit and the spirit by the Scripture The Catholikes cleared from the obiected Circle against their doctrine SECT II. THE question therefore is whether the Catholiks betweene Scripture and Church or the Protestants betweene the Scripture and the Spirit and otherwise do fall into this kind of vitious argumentation and proofe in maÌ„ner of a Circle And that the Catholikes are free from this fault and do make their proofe to seuerall sortes of persons in seuerall kinds of causes by a partiall manner of proofe and thereby do still proue one thing vnknowne by another more knowne to those persons is first to be proued For which we may note that the Catholikes require to Fayth for so much as is for our purpose two thinges First a preparation to prepare vs to accept the thinges belieued as credible and in prudence worthy to be belieued which is wrought by credible testimonyes such as are miracles consent sanctity antiquity and the rest before meÌ„tioned by which our vnderstanding is euidently conuinced to iudge and accept of the Christian Religion as more worthy or credit then any other Secondly they require a firme assent or beliefe to the articles of fayth proposed as true and of infallible verity which is wrought by the habit of fayth and dependes vpon the diuine reuelation of God declaring in Scripture or Tradition and proposing by holy Church what and why we are to belieue vpon which
reuelation thus proposed we settle our last resolution of fayth and the certainty of it as vpon the former credible motiues or humane fayth we setled our preparation or acceptation of fayth and the credibility of it Now if we compare or apply these togeather it will euidently appeare that in neither is committed any Circle because the former that is the acceptation depends vpon credible motiues which are as the Samaritan womans word making it seeme probable that Christ was the Messias and the later that is the assent to Fayth dependes â—pon diuine reuelation which is as our Sauiours word reuealing to them that he is the true Messias and so both haue seuerall grounds and principles on which they depend the one credible testimonies the other diuine reuelation wherby comparing them togeather no appearance of any circular proofe can be found betweene them For the actuall assent and beliefe it selfe whereby we infallibly belieue the mysteries reuealed though we belieue the verity of Scripture reuelations by the authority of Church proposition and Church proposition for the authority of Scripture reuelation whereby Scripture reuelation doth giue vs testimony of Church proposition and againe Church proposition of Scripture reuelation Yet that this reciprocall testimony and proofe is not any proper and vitious Circle is proued First because it is in diuerso genere causa in diuers kinds of causes which before out of Aristotle is admitted for good and lawfull for the testimonyes of Scripture reuelation to the infallibility of Church proposition is causall as a cause and that formall why we belieue and assent to Church proposition But Church proposition is only conditionall as conditio sine quae non to know Scripture reuelation and so they are reciprocall in a different manner of proofe the one that is Scripture à priori as including diuine reuelation the other that is Church à posteriori required only as a condition The former as a formall precedent cause the latter as a subsequent annexed condition Both of them not much vnlike to our Sauiours testimony of S. Iohn Baptist and to S. Iohns testimony of our Sauiour the one as of God and infallible the other as of an holy man credible or to the testimony of our B. Sauiour the woman to the Samaritans the one as giuing certainty the other as proposing credibility of his being the Messias Or to the former example of rationale and risibile of the Sun-shine and the Day of the Vapours and Raine of the opening the Window and the entring of the Wind. All which reciprocally proue one another as the cause and the effect or as seuerall causes And all which doe much resemble the testimony of Scripture to the Church and of the Church to the Scripture which is likewise in a seuerall kind of causality and a different manner of probation Secondly because this reciprocall proofe is not ad omnino idem as Aristotle requires to a proper Circle that is the one is not the totall and sole cause of knowing the other For Church proposition is not knowne only by Scripture reuelation and no other way but also by other proofes signes and credible testimonies conuincing that Church authority is necessary and infallible to distinguish true sense of Scripture from false and to end Controuersies about Scripture And therefore as Aristotle admits that though the premises haue proued the conclusion yet the conclusion may againe proue the premises that in eodem genere causae so that the conclusion be proued by another medium then by the premises So though the Scripture reuelation proue Church proposition yet Church proposition may againe reciprocally proue Scripture reuelation so it be knowne by another meanes as we see it is then only by Scripture reuelation for this according to Aristotle is only an improper Circle and not a bad and vnlawfull Circle Thirdly because this reciprocall proofe is not to one the same person who is ignorant or doubtful of both but to diuers persons and such as suppose the one For to a Catholike who admits as belieued Church propositioÌ„ we proue by it scripture-Scripture-sense or reuelation and so an vnknowne thing to him by another thing supposed and knowne to him but to a Protestant who admits as by him belieued Scripture reuelation we proue by it Church proposition so to him a thing vnknowne by another more knowne But to a Pagan who admits neither Scripture reuelation nor Church proposition we proue neither of them one by another but both the one and the other by other probable motiues and credible testimonies more agreeable to his natural capacity and by them persuade him first to accept as credible Church proposition and by it Scripture reuelation by which Scripture and Church or scripture expounded by Church we persuade him to assent and belieue the articles reuealed In all which we proue ignotum per notius the vnknowne by the more knowne to him and so preparing him to giue credit to one do by that induce him to belieue the other By which meanes we still proceed from a thing knowne to an vnknowne to that person and so auoyd the Circle and begging of the question into which the Protestants runne and there sticke fast In which note the difference betweene them and vs for they proue reciprocally and circularly the Scripture by the spirit and the spirit againe by scripture in the same kind of proofe to wit formally as shal be shewed We proue scripture by Church and Church by scripture in diuers kindes of cause to wit the one causall and the other conditionall as is shewed 2. They proue the one by the other no otherwise knowne then by the other as the scripture by the spirit which spirit is only and by no other meanes knowne then by scripture and é contra as shal be shewed But we haue more means to know the Church then by scripture as is shewed 3. They proue one by the other to the same person to wit the Protestant doubtfull of both we to diuers persons who suppose belieue the one so ad hominem by that we proue the other Al which as it is true as presently shal be shewed so it shewes an apparent difference between the Protestant circular maÌ„ner of proofe of scripture by spirit and of spirit by scripture and of our Catholike improper Circle and lawfull manner of proofe of scripture by Church and of Church by scripture And thus much to cleare the imputation layd vpon Catholikes for their circular manner of proceeding in their proofe of scripture by the Church and of Church by scripture The Protestants diuers manners of Circles SECT III. SVBDIV. â— The Circle betweene the Scripture and the Spirit IT remaynes to shew that the Protestants doe seuerall wayes fall into this vnlawfull Circular manner of probation for which we may note how the Protestants for their doctrine of fayth iustification and saluation do make this gradation concatenation
God not only that which was written in paper but also that which was deliuered in preaching by the Apostles We receiue without any addition or diminution that Canon which the auncient Church twelue hundred yeares ago receiued that translation which for as many ages hath been approued that sense which the auncient Fathers Councells and Church euer since Christ allowed that Iudge which hath an infallible warrant from God to iudge truly and impartially of the Canon the text the translation the sense all whatsoeuer is doubtfull And all our practise is to follow the spirit of God speaking in the auncient Fathers Councels Church by which we are secure from errour or falshood about the scripture and sense of it Fifthly For the Church of God they with their priuate spirit dishonor it and derogate from it 1. From the power and authority of it as not hauing according to them any visible head and gouernour assisted with the holy Ghost to direct and gouerne it and to iudge of all causes and controuersies in it and so make it headlesse and vngouerned We honour it in acknowledging it to be a visible and perpetuall Monarchy with a setled and spirituall both Gouernour and gouernement hauing in it an infallible authority to iudge and decide all causes and controuersies 2. They derogate from the visibility perpetuity and infallibility of the same making it not only subiect to errour and corruption but to haue erred and perished or at least become inuisible for many ages We honour it in belieuing that it cannot erre faile perish become inuisible or be corrupted in fayth but that it is the piller of truth against which assisted by the holy Ghost the gates and power of hell and heresy cannot preuaile 3. They derogate from the vnity sanctity vniuersality and succession of the same as notes and markes to distinguish it from all other congregations which they reiect and admit not We reuerence and respect it as one holy Catholike and Apostlike Church which no other congregation is or can be 4. They derogate from the vncontrollable authority stability of the decrees of Councells and from the infallible testimony of the vnanime consent of the Fathers Doctors of the Church both which they at their pleasure censure condemne We receaue imbrace and follow them as guids and directours to truth and as witnesses and testimonies of truth belieuing that which they belieue and reiecting that which they before reiected 5. They derogate from the splendour and beauty of the Church in the state of Prelates in the single life of the Clergy in the retirednesse of the Religious persons in the ornaments of the Churches and in the variety of so many orders and professions all which they reiect condemne as needlesse or superstitious We reuerence and honour the same as tending to the externall honour of God and the magnificence of his Church thereby making the Church beautifull as the Moone elect as the Sunne wel ordered as an Army of men And to cōclude they make the Church the mystery of iniquity a whore a harlot and a strumpet the whore of Babylon drunken with al abominable filth of superstition and abomination of idolatry and antichristianity with which she hath made all the Christian world all Kinges and Emperours and that not for one or two ages but for seauen on ten or twelue or fourteene ages according to diuers opinions drunke with the same cup of superstition abomination idolatry and antichristianity and make it a body consisting of persons whoeuen the best and purest are in all partes and in euery action stayned impure sinnefull vniust and wicked We doe belieue confesse it to be the kingdome the citty the house of God the spouse of Christ the temple of the holy Ghost the pillar of truth which Christ hath purchased washed with his precious bloud made immaculate incontaminate and vnspotted pure holy and perfect before him which no errour of superstition or idolatry can possesse no power of Pagans or Heretikes or Schismatikes or other wicked Christians can suppresse no subtilty of heresy infidelity or Sathan himselfe can supplant destroy or extinguish Sixhtly For the sacraments they from the number of seauen do curtaile fiue and leaue only two and from these two they take away from the one that is baptisme 1. The effect and vertue making it only a signe or seale no cause or instrument of grace and of no more vertue then the baptisme of S. Iohn Baptist 2. They take away all necessity of it making it not needfull for infants whom they will haue saued by the parents faith without it From the other that is the Eucharist they take away both the fruit and the substance of it making it not the reall body and bloud of Christ but only a bare signe and remembrance of it Not any sacrifice offered to God but only a Sacrament signing or sealing grace and therby robbe Christ of all adoration by it as a Sacramēt and of all subiection or acknowledgment of dominion by it as a sacrifice and they robbe the Church of all benifit comfort both by the Sacrament and sacrifice We do admit for seuerall states of persons seuerall sorts of benefits by seauen seuerall kindes of Sacraments all as instruments of Gods power causing grace which assists all sorts of persons in their seuerall states and functions and all excell the Sacraments of the old law For the Sacrament of baptisme we belieue it to be a meanes of regeneration from originall sinne by which all sinne and punishment due to sinne both original actual is fully remitted and by which all persons are admitted into the mysticall body of Iesus Christ in his holy Church and made capable of the benefit of the rest of the Sacraments And for the Sacrament of the Eucharist we belieue that not only i◠conteines the fountaine of Grace but also is offered to God as a sacrifice to apply the vertue of his sacrifice on the crosse for the remission of our sinnes by which is giuen much honour to God and receiued great benefit by Gods Church much comfort to the faithfull both liuing and dead Seauenthly for Faith they and their priuate spirit admit many sorts of faith and in that none at all and make as many faiths as there are priuate spirits in particuler persons and in that destroy all vnity of faith We admit one holy Catholicall and Apostolicall faith one in al and generall to all who in all are directed by one spirit of Gods Church They admit a new and new-deuised faith neuer receiued by any but in some one or other point by condemned hereticks in whom it was condemned We receiue an auncient and euer belieued faith euer receiued and approued by general Coūcells ancient Fathers holy Saints in Gods Church They reiect the grounds of faith as Scripture Traditions Church Councells and Fathers We admit belieue
according to the order and proportion of the whole that as the necessity and conueniency of the whole body doth require so the operation and function of the part is accommodated and applied and so all the parts and members of the Church being by one spirit combined and vnited togeather as members of one body and in vnity of one hody do euery one belieue as they are directed by the head and do proceed in all with subordination to the head and worke in all for the vse and benefit of the whole suffer for the defence of the whole and so by a communion both with themselues and with the whole do all labour for the whole conserue the whole and keep still an vnion and communion with the whole and are directed according to the faith the rule the reason and the Iudgment or direction of the whole body or Church of Christ As long therfore as euery member and his spirit hath this direction subordination and vnion with the whole body of the Church and the spirit of it so long doth it prooced in order and vnity and so farre it is agreable to the spirit of God directing his holy spouse the Church but when this spirit doth beginne to be singular of it selfe to deuise a new doctrine to teach otherwise then the rule of faith hath prescribed or to assume the authority of a new maister When it deuides it selfe from the spirit of Gods Church and doth oppose it selfe against it or extoll it selfe aboue it when it will not be subiect and subordinate to it but doth erect a Cathedra of authority of its own or an opinion of doctrine of its owne against it then it is an euident signe that it is not a spirit of vnity and concord but of dissention and diuision so not an inspiration of God to be imbraced but a suggestion of sathan to be reiected Out of which rule may be obserued the difference betweene a Catholicke and a Protestant spirit in expounding of scripture and withall the weaknesse or rather impertinency of the Protestant obiections for their manner of interpretation of scripture by this their spirit For first we distinguish betweene them who without offence lawfully may expound and who by authority haue warrant infallibly to expound holy scripture Of the former sorts are all faythfull Christians who hauing vnderstanding sufficient and a pious intention do with humility beginne and according to the rule of fayth proceed in seeking out the right sense of Scripture and so none who are thus able and thus proceed are barred from either reading or expounding to their own coÌ„fort the Holy Scripture as our aduersaries do falsely calumniate vs. Of the later sort are the Pastours and Prelates of the Church who hauing lawfull ordination and succession and continuing in vnity and subordination do either deliuer the sense of Scripture as it is taught by holy Church or els confirme and explicate any doctrine of fayth when they are collected in a generall Councell And these thus vsing the lawfull meanes and obseruing the vsuall rule of fayth haue authenticall warrant by the infallible assistance of the holy Ghost that they cannot erre in deliuering any sense of scripture as a ground of fayth and beliefe The Protestants doe giue not only liberty but also authority to all not only Pastours and Prelates but also Artificers and common people as well vnlearned as learned to frame to themselues such a firme assent to this or that seeming to them infallibly true sense of holy Scripture euery one according to his owne preiudicate conceit or priuate spirit that thereupon they dare aduenture the certainty of their Fayth and the hope of their saluation Secondly we make a difference betweene a sense of scripture produced in the Schooles to proue or confirme a schoole question a sense declared ex Cathedra to ground an article of faith or betweene a preachers conceit deliuered in the pulpit to exhort to good life and manners and a doctrine proposed by the Church as reuealed by God necessary to be belieued In which for the former we giue a liberty to any preacher to frame out of his own coÌ„ceit any sense which not being opposit to true fayth may moue the auditory to piety good life but for the later we confine the ranging liberty of the wit and inuention euen of the Doctours Pastours in Gods Church prescribe as fayth Vincentius Lyrin that They teach that which is deliuered to them not which is inuented by them that which they receaued not that which they deuised that which is of publike tradition not of priuate vsurpation that of which they are not authours but keepers not beginners but followers not leaders but lead In which cunningly caruing faythfully placing wisely adorning like another Beezeler the pretious pearles of diuine fayth by adding splendour grace and beauty they are to illustrate more clearely that which was belieued more obscurely and to deliuer to posterity more fully explicated that which by their forefathers being not vnderstood was with reuerence belieued Alwayes so teaching that which they learned that they teach after a new maÌ„ner but not a new doctrine That is as afterward he sayth That they interprete the diuine Canon according to the tradition of the whole Church and the rules of Catholike fayth that is Vniuersality Antiquity and Consent and if any part do rebell against the whole or nouelty oppose antiquity or if dissent of a few controule the consent of all or the most then mâ—st they preferre the integrity of the whole before the corruption of a part the veneration of antiquity before prophanation of nouelty and the generality of a Councell before the temerity of a few The Protestants giue a liberty by the priuiledge of their spirit to euery not only Preacher but priuate person to expound the most difficult and important places of Scripture namely of the Apocalyps S. Pauls Epistles not only for the schooles in scholasticall questions or in pulpit for exhortations to good life but in deepest articles greatest controuersies of Fayth euery one as his spirit shall suggest and thereupon they direct them to ground their fayth the saluation of their owne soule and of many others who rely vpon them Whereby as sayth Vincentius Lyrinensis They make it a solemne practise to delight in prophane nouelties and to loath all decrees of antiquity and by making ostentation of a false opinion of knowledge do make shipwracke of all fayth Thirdly the Spirit of a Catholike will not presume to expound any text of scripture contrary to that sense which either the rule of fayth or the practise of the Church or the decree of a Councell or the consent of Fathers hath receaued as true and authenticall but in al will receaue follow that which is determined and decreed in theÌ„ The ProtestaÌ„t spirit will censure reiect and condemne any sense though neuer
seriously discussed may suffice to satisfy the Reader that in their iudgement this priuate spirit is an vnfit Interpreter of holy Scripture and an vnable iudge to decide matters of Fayth Secondly we may note that though none of the ancient Fathers did in particuler write of this subiect nor yet on set purpose confute it yet these sayinges and sentences of theirs sought and picked out as so many dispersed flowers of their seuerall gardens and coupled togeather as into one nose-gay may serue for a taste of their generall opinions iudgement in this matter especially since their assertions were neuer contradicted nor their persons euer censured by any for them Thirdly we may note that those Fathers who doe either attribute this prerogatiue of interpreting Scripture to the Church or Pastours of it as the most cyted by Bellarmine before quoted doe or derogate the same from all humane and proper wit and iudgement as some of these heere cyted in their words do do both of them as much as if in expresse tearmes they had done it condemne this priuate spirit and power of it as incompetent for a Iudge of Fayth 1. because they who interprete Scripture and assigne the Fathers Councells or Church for approued and authorized Iudges in this case must needs condemne those who forsake them and oppose themselues and their iudgement against them which all they doe who rely vpon their priuate spirit and prefer their iudgement of it before the iudgement of the Church and Fathers 2. Because all who are guided by this priuate spirit and rely vpon it doe in effect rely vpon their owne iudgement and opinion and so either erroneously mistaking themselues or abusing the spirit do insteed of the spirit of God make their owne conceit fancy or imagination the iudge and vmpire of all These being supposed we will descend to particulers and cyte some of these Fathers and their testimonies in thei◠seuerall ages First therefore to begin◠〈◊〉 the first age of the Apostles to descend downe 〈◊〉 S Clement the scholer of S. Paul and coetaneall with the Apostles sayth It is to be obserued that when the law of God is read it ought not to be read or vnderstood according to the meaning of euery mans owne wit for there are many thinges in holy Scripture which may be wrested to that meaning which euery one volūtarily presumes to frame to himselfe but this cannot be Loe the sense which euery ones wit and iudgement which they call their spirit presumes to frame cannot be a true and infallible sense of Scripture In the second age Irenaeus a Doctour and Martyr whō S. Hierome calles Virum Apostolicum an Apostolicall man speaking of the Heretiks of his tyme sayth Euery one sayth that his owne fiction which he hath deuised of himselfe is wisedome that he vndoubtedly vnspottedly and sincerely doth know the hiddē mysteries These Heretikes made the inuention of their own braine the vndoubted spirit of wisedome to vnderstand the hidden mysteries of Fayth Tertullian speaking of Heretikes who differ among themselues sayth Euery one doth tune what he receaues according to his owne liking in the same manner as he who taught them made it according to his owne liking Againe shewing that diuersity of doctrine brings corruption of scripture he sayth They who are resolued to teach otherwise then the Church must change the meanes of doctrine that is scripture since how came the heretikes to be strangers and enemies to the Apostles but by the diuersity of doctrine which euery one according to his owne liking either made or receaued Againe VVho are rauenous wolues but subtill senses and spirits that lye close to molest the flocke of Christ VVho are false Prophets but false Preachers VVho are false Apostles but adulterous Ghospellers Againe He is to be counted an Heretike who forsaking that which was first doth choose to himselfe that which was not before Againe Heresy is called in Greek of Election by which one chooseth to beginne or follow it therefore S. Paul sayd that therefore an Heretike was damned because he chose to himselfe that for which he is damned It is not lawfull for vs to introduce any thing vpon our owne opiniō nor to follow that which others introduced vpon their owne opinion And he calles Adams sin an Heresy because he chose it rather vpon his owne then Gods election Heere are deceitful spirits euery one 's owne spirit liking will purpose resolution opinion and election described to be that which makes men Heretikes and strangers from God rauenous Wolues false Prophets and adulterous Ghospellers and damned Heretikes and changes the sense of Scripture Out of which the same Tertullian affirmes That heresy is a matter of humanae temerity not diuine authority which alwayes so amends the Ghospell vntill it corrupt it That all doctrine is true not which came from a priuate spirit but which agrees with the Apostolicall mother and originall Churches and that is without doubt to be held which the Church receaued from the Apostles the Apostles from Christ Christ from God all other doctrine is preiudicated as that which sauoureth against the verity of the Church of Christ. Againe That to deale with Heretikes by Scriptures is but to turne ones stomacke or breake his braine to loose his speach by contending to rayse choler by hearing their blasphemy since what the most expert Scripturist can alleadge they will deny and what he denies they will defend eyther by denying Scripture or by adding or detracting from it Valentinus sayth he receaued that which was most for his purpose and formed the Scriptures to his owne opinions but not his opinions to Scripture And so as S. Augustine saies They contend not for the true meaning of Scripture but for their owne opinions making that which is the opinion of their owne to be the meaning of Scripture In the third age Clemens Alexand. in his learned bookes Stromatum which he wrote according to Baron anno 204. shewing not only that Heretikes alleadge Scripture but also how they vse it sayth Though they who follow heresies presume to vse the propheticall Scriptures yet they neither vse all of them nor these they vse entirely but choosing those sayings which are doubtfull they draw them to their owne priuate opinions This is one of the chiefest sleightes of this their priuate spirit to wrest doubtfull sentences to their owne aduantage make that which is vncertaine in it selfe certaine and a point of Fayth In the same age S. Cyprian that Doctor suauissimus Martyr beatissimus as S. August calles him speaking of some whome the Diuell leades from one blindnes of the world to another darkenesse of errour sayth They call themselues Christians and while they walke in darknes they thinke they are in light the Diuell flattering and deceauing them who transfigures himselfe into an Angell of light
and subornes his owne Ministers as Ministers of iustice affirming night to be day damnation to be saluation and shadowing desperation vnder pretence of hope perfidiousnes vnder pretence of Faith Antichrist vnder the name of Christ Againe shewing how heresies and schismes arise out of disobedience of the people to one Pastour and Iudge in place of Christ he sayth No man should make any stirre against the colledge of Priests no man after diuine iudgement after the suffrage of the people after the consent of fellow-Bishops should make himselfe iudge not now of the Bishop but of God No man should deuide the vnity of Christs Church by discord being proud should by himselfe coyne and set abroad a new heresy Againe The beginning and endeauour of Heretikes and Schismatikes is to please themselues and to contemne their Superiour with swelling pride they goe out of the Church and set vp a new Altar breake peace and vnity Againe In doctrine as well diuine as philosophicall it is neyther safe nor fit that persons vnlearned and ignorant of that which belonges to those sciences should venture to discusse that they know not and to be maisters of what they are ignorant In all which the effect of the priuate spirit is described to be to question examine that which is determined by Bishops and Councels to make it selfe iudge of all to diuide the vnity of the Church to broach new heresies and in conceit and respect of it selfe to contemne all superiority to teach that they know not and to be maisters of what they vnderstand not In the fourth age S. Ambrose a man so worthy that S. Augustine reuerenced him as his Father who begot him in Christ so praysed him that he not only calles him happy the flower of latin writers but all the Roman world sayth he with me admire him his grace constancy labours perils both in workes and wordes Yea sayth he Pelagius the Heretike so extolled him that he durst not reprehend him his exposition of Scripture but acknowledged that in his bookes aboue others did shine the brightnesse of the Roman fayth This holy Saint and Doctour sayth Those are Heretikes who by the wordes of the law impugne the law for they set a proper sense vpon the wordes that they may commend the wickednesse of their owne opinion by the authority of the law Againe It is a very dangerous thing if after so many prophesies of the Prophets after the testimonies of the Apostles after the bloud of Martyrs thou darest presume to discusse the ancient faith as new after so many guides dost remaine in errour and after the toiles of so many departed this life darest contend in idle disputation let vs reuerence therefore our owne Fayth in the glory of Martyrs Heere is this priuate spirit and two effects of it the one to interprete Scripture according to euery mans owne liking the other to examine and question againe that which hath beene iudged by the Pastours of Gods Church and to censure them and their iudgement both condemned by S. Ambrose S. Hierome one whome Prosper calles Vitae exemplum mundi magistrum An example of life and the maister of the world whome S. Augustine calles One most learned skillfull in three tongues desires to conferre with him to adhere to him and to be instructed by him sent his books to be censured of him and commended others as Orosius who trauelled for that end from Spaine to Palestine to learn of him And whome Damasus the Pope and many from all the partes of the world consulted with about obscure places of Scripture This great lampe of Gods Church sayth Heretikes whatsoeuer they speake they thinke it to be the word or the law neither doe they vouchsafe to know what the Apostles or Prophets thought but doe apply certaine incongruous testimonies to their owne sense and meaning as though it were not a great most wicked manner of teaching to depraue the sentences of Scripture and to draw them contrary to their sense vnto their owne will A deuise proper to this spirit to thinke all it sayes to be Scripture and to wrest all scripture to its owne liking Againe he sayth That Heretikes of the guifts of Nature haue made to themselues Idols not which they receaued of God but which they made out of their owne braine That they haue turned the holy speaches and senses of Scripture into Idols which they haue framed out of their owne heart That hauing lost their iudgement they worship the Idols which they haue framed of their owne hart and are possessed with the spirit of spirituall fornication That of the sense of Scripture they haue made Idols of diuers opinions and abominations of offences That they vse the diuine wordes and testimonies to their owne sense and do giue them to drinke to those whome they deceaue and with whome they haue fornicated That in all questions they follow not the authority of Scripture but the opinion of human reason That they snatch certaine sentences out of Scripture and sowing them togeather doe set them to that matter to which they cannot agree and so do set them as pillowes vnder euery ones elbow to delude them Thus doe sayth he all heresies deceaue and draw to death by faire promises all sortes of ages and sexes giuing them not solid bread of Scripture but broken and cut peeces of crummes Thus did the Manichees Gnostikes Marcion take testimonyes out of the pure fountaine of Scripture but did not interpret them as they were written but cōuerted the simple meaning of Gods word to signify that which themselues would haue All this they did bragging of their receauing the spirit of God which yet they had not but the spirit of the Diuell by which they were carryed into diuers factions Such an Angell and diabolicall spirit did possesse and fill Philomela Apelles his virgin Cōcerning which spirit he concludes that It is called Heresy ab 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of election by choosing euery one that doctrine which seemes to him better vnderstanding the Scripture otherwise then the Holy Ghost meant it by which he is an Heretike The sūme of which gathered out of these dispersed places is that all Heretikes being deceaued by the spirit by their owne opinion and their owne selfe seeming conceit do choose to themselues what sense of Scripture seemes most pleasing to them and therby make it an Idoll of their owne inuention by which they deceaue themselues and delude others Eusebius confirmes the same saying of the Seuerians That they interpret the sense of Scripture according to their owne liking In the fifth age S. Augustine one so highly commended both by ancient Fathers and late Protestants that as before is at full cyted they both count him as a maister of all learning as
or forme of true doctrine which they had learned and is committed to them The doctrine which they receaued froÌ„ the beginning VVhich was first euangelized to them Or the precepts of the Apostles and ancients Or rather of our Sauiour deliuered by the holy Prophets and Apostles And the word of God which remaines for euer That the knowledge of this rule or doctrine of fayth is presupposed to the true knowledge and vnderstanding of scripture is proued both by scripture and reason By scripture the Prophet Isay sayth as S. Cyprian and S. Augustine do both of them read and vnderstand it Except you belieue you cannot vnderstand that is sayth S. Cyprian the Iewes cannot vnderstand the scripture except they first belieue in Christ S. Augustine sayth There be some of you who vnderstand not and therefore they vnderstand not because they belieue not let vs first adhere by Fayth that we may be reuiued by vnderstanding And in another place Fayth must go before Vnderstanding that the vnderstanding may be the reward of Fayth Therefore Fayth and the rule of fayth is necessary before the vnderstanding of Scripture Secondly the Scripture for the sense is a Booke sealed with seauen seales these seales none can open but he who hath the key of Dauid This key of Dauid is giuen only to them who are faythfull with Dauid therfore the key of faith is requisit to the opening the sense of the booke of scripture which is confirmed by S. Hierome who alleadging the same words sayth The Law is spirituall and requires reuelation that it be vnderstood For proofe of which he produceth the example of the Eunuch who read but vnderstood not the scripture till Philip did expound it to him made him faythfull and so became of a scholler a Maister Thirdly Euery learned Scribe in the Kingdome of Heauen is like to a man the maister of a family who bringeth out of his treasure new and old The Scribes were the Maisters and Interpreters of scripture but they were in the kingdome of heauen that is in the Church by Fayth and so did interprete the new and old Testament which S. Augustine alleadging to the same purpose against the Manichees sayth You vnderstand not because you belieue not as sayth I say for you are not instructed in the kingdome of heauen that is in the true Catholike Church of Christ for if you were you would produce old and new out of the scriptures Therfore one must be a scholler in the Church by fayth before he can come to vnderstand the scripture as a Maister Fourthly S. Paul sayth to Timothy Thou hast learned holy scriptures from thy infancy which are able to instruct thee to saluation by fayth which is in Christ. If the scriptures instruct by Fayth then Fayth is prerequired before we can be instructed by them or vnderstand them Fifthly the holy Fathers and Doctours of the Church haue by the breach of this rule as a signe discerned Heretikes and by the authority of it as a strong argument confuted the same Thus were discerned Marcion Valentinus Câ—rinthus and Basilides by their deprauing the rule of truth witnesse Irenaeus Thus Paulus Samosatenus by his forsaking the Canon of the Church and flying to strange and adulterous doctrine Thus Montanus by his vttering strange words contrary to the custome of the Church deriued by tradition and succession from the Apostles witnes of both Eusebius Thus Nestorius by forsaking the ancient doctrine and introducing of new witnes Socrates And thus all Heretikes by their forsaking the rule of Christianity witnesse S. Augustine They being all esteemed to haue truth on their side who walke according to the rule which the Church receaued from the Apostles the Apostles from Christ witnes Tertullian Thus did S. Hierome confute and confound the heresy of the Luciferians by the light of the Sunne of the Church Gregorius Nazianzen the same by the doctrine abhorring the same S. Basil the Eunomians by the vnwritteÌ„ tradition of the Church Athanasius the Arians by the authority of the Orthodoxe Church and his ancestors opposite to them and abhorring their doctrine S. Epiphanius the Melchisidechians by the tradition of the Apostles and succession of doctrine The Millenarians by their transgressing the limits of the holy Church of God and the hope of Propheticall and Apostolicall tradition in fayth and doctrine And the Demerâ—s and other Heretikes by the style of Christianisme and the phrase of the Apostles receaued from the Fathers S. Augustine the Pelagians by the grounded custome of the Church hastening to baptisme infants By the most ancient knowne and vndoubted rule of Fayth truth And by the authority of the Church so commended in scrâ—pture The Donatists by the authority of the Church and by apostolicall Tradition And both Irenaeus Origen and S. Augustine did confute all Heretikes by the tradition of the Apostles manifest to the whole world in the Church sayth Irenaeus By the Ecclesiasticall tradition dissented off by none sayth Origen By the Catholike Church whose not receauing any opinion is sufficient sayth S. Augustine to confound any heresy Therfore the doctrine and practise of the ancient Fathers was to discerne and confute all Heretikes by this rule of Fayth Sixthly the same is proued by Reason because the scripture is the booke of the faythfull not the faithlesse therefore as it was writ to the faythfull as the conuerted Iewes Romans Corinthians c. so it is vnderstood truely only by the faythfull as the Christians not by the Infidels as the Iewes Turkes and Heretikes who haue and read the wordes but vnderstand not the sense meaning because the veile is yet ouer their eyes in the reading of it for want of fayth therefore the letter that is the words and reading of it doth kill them and is to them a ministration of death and only the spirit that is the vnderstanding of it doth giue life to them who haue fayth Of which necessity of Fayth prerequired to the vnderstanding of Scripture see Stapleton de principijs Doctrinalibus where the same is further proued out of the ancient Fathers testimonyes to wit S. Augustine Irenaeus Origen Athanasius Cyrill of Alexandria Theodoret and Vincentius Lyrin who sayth that the holy and learned men did interprete the holy Scripture according to the traditions of the Catholike Church and the rule of Catholike fayth And againe That the line of propheticall and Apostolicall interpretation must be directed according to the rule of the Catholike and Ecclesiasticall sense Which and much more he alleadges against the custome of Heretikes who haue alwayes the Scripture in their mouth and out of it do confirme their errours Out of which may be inferred how vntruly and fraudulently the Protestants do generally auerre that in the scripture the spirit of God is and is to be sought
can be a fit meanes vpoÌ„ which any certaine and authenticall exposition of scripture can be grounded Which is to be performed two wayes 1. By reasons drawne from the property and condition of the holy scripture and the sense and meaning of it 2. By reasons drawne from the property and condition of the priuate spirit and the vncertainty and deceitfulnes of it SVBDIV. 1. By reasons drawne from the nature of holy Scripture which is to be expounded FIrst therefore for the holy Scripture such is the difficulty of it which ariseth partly from the ambiguity of the words including diuers significations partly from the fecuÌ„dity of the significatioÌ„s affording multiplicity of senses partly from the profundity of the matter inuolued in misteries obscure and exceeding our capacity such I say is the difficulty of the scripture which aryseth out of these grounds that no priuate man nor any priuate spirit of any man can secure himselfe of the certainty of any much lesse of all of them For if we respect the words and text of scripture this spirit cannot vpon any ground assure any man that either this booke rather then another is the diuine word of God or of this booke that this is the true and complete Canon or of this Canon that this is the first and originall text or of this text that it is the right authenticall translation or of this translation that any one rather theÌ„ another is the true and Canonical sense or of these senses that one more then other containes all articles and points necessary to saluation all which are yet necessary to be expounded This spirit cannot expresse and assure what booke is Canonicall and what not It cannot accord the Lutherans and Caluinists whether the Epistle to the Hebrewes of Iames 2. of Peter the 2. and 3. of Iohn nor the Catholikes and Protestants whether the bookes of Machabees Toby Iudith Hester c. be canonicall or not It caÌ„ giue no reason why there should be admitted into the Canon of scripture the Gospels of Mathew Marke Luke and Iohn and not the Gospels of Thomas Nathanael Matthias Thadaeus Bartholomew Iames Iohn c Andrew Paul Nicodemus the Hebrews the EgiptiaÌ„s with that of Peter or the Nazarits It can giue no reason why the Epistles of S. Paul Iames Iohn Iude Peter should be admitted and why not those of Barnabas of Luke the rest of S. Peter of S. Paul that to the Laodiceans the 3. to the Corinthians the 3. to the Thessalonians It can giue no reason why the Acts writ by S. Luke should be admiteâ—d and not the Acts writ by Peter by Paul and by Andrew Thomas Iohn Philip and Matthias nor the Periods of Paul Thecla nor the Constitutions of the Apostles or the booke of Hermes or Enoch why the Apocalyps of S. Iohn should be amittted not the Apocalyps of S. Peter Paul Thomas Stephen Elias nor the death of our Lady the circuite of S. Iohn the sentences of Bartholomew the ascension of Esie all which haue beene extant and by some challenged as Canonicall as may be seene in Doctour Stapleton It cannot resolue and assure what bookes were originally writ in Hebrew what in the Chaldean what in the Greeke or Latine tongue who they were that writ the bookes of the old Testament and whether they be the same which were first written and the same sound and vncorrupted Whether this Hebrew text be the same either in Character or letter of which is question or in wordes of which many doubt which was first written What is the sense signification phrase or stile of any Hebrew word Whether the Greeke of the Septuaginte which the Apostles followed be sound and incorrupted and to be preferred before the Hebrew Whether the ancient Latin vulgar or others of later translation as of Erasmus Luther Oecolampadius Bibliander Beza Castalio Tremelius and others be to be followed Whether of any English translations the Catholike translation of the Rhemist or the Protestants of Tindall of King Edward of the Bishops of Geneua or of King Iames are to be receaued as true which is to be rejected as false None of these can the priuate spirit in euery ordinary man nor yet in the learned Protestant certainly decide and resolue It cannot satisfy and assure when the wordes are in the literall or mysticall sense to be vnderstood And for the literall when it passeth from speaking of thinges carnall to thinges spirituall from temporal to eternall from the kingdome of Israell to the kingdome of Christ as often in the Psalmes and Prophets it doth As for exaÌ„ple from the Kings of Syria and Israell to our B. Lady Christ From the King of Babylon to Lucifer From Salomon to Christ From the barly Bread to the sacramentall Bread And for the mysticall sense when it is to be vnderstood morally for manners when allegorically of Christ or the Church militant when anagogically of glory or the Church triuÌ„phant When the same wordes beare a proper and when a figuratiue sense and of the figuratiue sense when the figure is Synecdoche the part for the whole When Metonimya the signe or cause for the effect When it is Catechresis by which the inuentour of a thing is called Father Cittyes are called Daughters posterity is called House c. When by Hiperbole or exageration the whole world is put for much all for many When by Liptote or diminution Idols are called vaine thinges â—oxious vnprofitable When by Analoge one person tyme number gender or signification is set for another When by Hendâ—adis two thinges are put for one as signes and tymes for signes of tymes When by Prolepsis or anticipation places citties are named by names which afterward were giueÌ„ them When by Analoge or mutation one sense as seeing is set for another as hearing tasting c. When by Hetorosis the abstracte as abomination for the concrete as abominable By Haebraisme causalites or similituds ar omitted tenses are changed persons or matters are supposed when an occasion is set downe for a cause the euent for the effect the diuel for sinne eternity for a long time When sinne is meant for sinne it selfe or for a sacrifice or punishment of sinne God for an angell a desire of doing for the deed an act as of seeing for the obiect of feare for the thing or person feared When lawes are called by names of precepts statutes iustice iudgement testimonies or testameÌ„t When works of the law of nature or of faith are tearmed only works or faith When Christ is taken for the person of Christ the head or for the body of Christ the Church or for both When father is meant essentially for God or personally for the first person only When by the Church is meant the Church militant or triumphant the whole body or principal members When Predestination is to glory or to grace When obduration is actiue
by our selues or permissiue by God When Christian liberty is for liberty from sinne or misery frō the law of Moyses or Christ or from obedience to Princes or Prelates c. All which and many more are difficulties vsuall and controuerted in the scripture both of the old and new Testament This priuate spirit in euery man cannot explicate when the figure is not only in the words but in the matter when one thing is a figure of another as the paschall lambe of Christ the red sea of baptisme the māna of the Eucharist mount Sion of the Church or when one thing is a figure of many things as Ionas of Christ and the Iewes the rocke of the baptisme of the faithfull and the punishment of the vnfaithfull the flood of Noe of baptisme and of damnation When one and the same thing is a figure in one sense not in an other as the fornicating wife of Osee was of the Iewes as she sinned in fornication before mariage not as she liued chast after mariage This spirit cannot explicate in euery one many seeming contradictions as that the sonne shall not beare the iniquity of the father and that God doth visit the iniquity of the fathers vpon the Children to the third and fourth generation That the gifts of God are without repentance and God repented that he made Saul King That In the Arke was nothing els but two Tables of stone and In the arke were the pitcher of manna the rod of Aaron and the Tables That Do not answere a foole according to his folly and answer a foole according to his folly That i God made not death and life and death are of God That The disciples should take nothing in the way not a rodde and should take nothing in the way but a rodde That If I giue testimony of my selfe my testimony is not true and If I do giue testimony of my selfe my testimony is true That Mary came to the monument when it was yet darke and She came when the sunne was risen That A man is iustified by faith without works and A man is iustified by works and not by faith That t If I did please men I should not be the seruant of Christ and I please al men in all things That S. Pauls companions at his conuersion with many others did heare a voice and did not heare a voice All which with many more many very learned both ancient as S. Augustine and moderne as diuers Interpreters haue with great paines in great volumes laboured to reconcile This spirit cannot vnfould many bookes Chapters and places in scripture most difficult as the first Chapter of Genesis about the creation of the world the bookes of Kings Paralipomenon and the Acts of the Apostles about Genealogies and reignes of Kinges The Prophesy of Daniel about the seauenty weekes Of Ezechiel about the Temple Of S. Iohn in the Apocalips about the Angels the seales the trumpets the phyals the dragon the whore and the rest in which saith S. Hierome are as many misteries as words If one should aske this spirit in euery ordinary Protestant how it will explicate and reconcile Moyses who according to the Hebrew and vulgar edition omits Cainam betweene Arphaxad Sala and with him 130. yeares in the genealogy of Adam with S. Luke who folowing the greek of the Septuaginte doth adde Cainā How it will accord the Hebrew text which accounts but 292. yeares from Noe to Abraham with the Septuaginte who account 942. yeares adding more then the hebrew 100. yeares almost to euery generation or person How it will accord the hebrew text which from Adam to Noe reckons vp but 1656. yeares with the greeke of the Septuaginte which reckons vp 2242. yeares somtimes adding somtimes detracting from the former How it will make an agreement betwixt the history of Moyses in Genesis and the relation of S. Luke in the Acts. 1. in Abrahās departure out of Haram Moyses by computation affirming it to haue beene before the death of his Father Thare for Abraham was 75. years old when he departed and was borne in the 70. yeare of his Father Thare who liued 205. and so Abraham departed out of the Land when Thare his Father was 141. yeares old that is 60 yeares before he dyed and yet S. Steuen sayth he departed after Thare his fathers death 2. In the tyme of the Israelites mansion in Aegypt Moyses by computation affirming it to haue beene but 215. yeares which S. Paul confirms accounting from the promise to Abraham till the departure out of Aegypt but 430. years that is 215. before the entrāce and 215. after the entrance till their departure and yet S. Luke and S. Steuen affirme from the entrance till the departure to haue beene 400. 3. In the number of persons that entred into Aegypt with Iacob Moyses saying that they were but 66. or 70. and S. Steuen and S. Luke saying that they were 75. 4. About the buriall of Iacob in this 1. in the place Moyses saying it was in Hebron ouer against Mambre and S. Luke and S. Steuen saying it was in Sichē 2. In the seller of the field or sepulcher Moyses affirming Abraham to haue bought it of Ephrem the sonne of Seor and S. Luke and S. Steuen of the sonnes of Hemor Which Hemor sayth Moyses sold it to Iacob not Abraham and was according to Moyses the Father of Sichem not as S. Luke and S. Steuen say the sonne of Sichem 3. In the buyer of the same sepulcher Moyses affirming that Iacob S. Luke that Abraham bought it of them 4. In the price of the sayd sepulcher or field Moyses affirming Iacob to haue bought it for a 100. Lambes or to haue got it by the sword or bow from the Amorrhoites S. Luke and S. Steuen affirming him to haue bought it for siluer If one should aske how the bookes of the Kinges and Paralipomenon and the Acts can by this spirit be explicated and made agree 1. In the yeares of Saul who 1. Reg. 13.1 is sayd to haue beene a child of two yeares old when he began to raigne and to haue raigned two yeares and yet 1. Reg. 9.2 he is sayd before his raigne to haue been higher by the shoulders vpward then any in Israell and Act. 15.12 to haue reigned 40. yeares 2. About the computation of tyme from the diuision of the land vnder Iosue to Samuel which according to S. Luke and S. Paul in his speach in the Synagogue at Antioch Act. 13.20 according to the Greeke and Protestant edition are 450. yeares but according to the computation made by raigne of the Iudges are but 345. For 3. Reg. 6.1 the Temple was built 480. yeares after the departure out of Aegypt from which if there be deduced 50.
from the departure till the diuision of the land and also 40. of Samuel and Sauls raigne 40. of Dauids togeather with 4. of Salomons raigne which in all make 134. as they are collected out of Scripture there remaines from the departure out of Aegypt till the building of the Temple not 450. years as S. Luke relats but only 345. 3. About the raigne of Ioram King of Iuda and Ochozias his sonne after him for Ioram began to raigne when he was 32. years old raigned 8. years which for his whole life is 40. yet Ochozias his sonne who succeeded him is sayd to haue beene 42. yeares old when he began to raigne 2. Para. 22.2 by which he being 42. yeares old when his Father dyed being but 40. should be two years elder then his Father who begat him a question to S. Hierome inexplicable 4. About the raigne of Ioachim or Iechonias King of Iuda who is sayd 2. Paral. 36.9 to haue beene but eight yeares old and 4. Reg. 24.8 to haue beene eighteen years old both of them when he began to raigne 5. About Ioram King of Israel who is sayd to haue begun his raigne 4. Reg. 1.17 in the second yeare of Ioram King of Iuda and yet 4. Reg. 3.1 to haue begun the same in the eighteen yeare of Iosaphat who was Iorams Father and raigned 25. yeares 6. About the supputation of tyme as it is counted by the raigne of the Kings of Iuda and of Israel for from the beginning of the kingdome of Israel in the first of Roboam King of Iuda till the end of the same in the sixth of Ezechias when Samaria was taken are 260. yeares according to the raigne of the Kinges of Iuda and yet in the same tyme according to the raigne of the Kinges of Israel are only 240. yeares To all which if we adde the difficult places which according to S. Peter are in the Epistles of S. Paul as for example how are to be interpreted that of 1. Cor. 3.11 Gold siluer hay stubble the day of our Lord fire and to be saued by the fire That of 1. Cor. 15.29 How to be baptized for the dead That of Hebr. 6.4 It is impossible for those that fall to repent If we adde the difficult places which in the Euangelists are hard as for example in S. Marke who cites the Prophet Esay for Malachy In S. Matthew who cites Ieremy for Zachary In S. Luke who adds a generation of Cainam to the same cyted by Moyses and makes 40. Generations from Dauid to Christ where S. Matthew makes but 28. In S. Iohn who maks the day of Christs Passion the day before the festiuall day the rest of the Euangelists the day of the feast If we add the difficult places of which many holy and learned men of ancient time doubted sent for explication some to S. August as Marcellinus a Noble man and Martyr Volusianus gouernour of Rome and Paulinus Simplicianus Euodius and Honoratus all Bishops Some to S. Hierome as Marcella and Principia Suna and Fratella Hebidia and Algasia noble and religious women as Vitalis Dardanus Euagrius Damasus holy and learned Bishops And lastly if we adde all those places which all ancient and moderne Heretikes haue in so many articles of fayth abused and corrupted for the establishing of their new inuented heresies If I say we adde all these to the former it will by them appeare that the priuate spirit in euery man can be neither a competent nor yet a sufficient meanes to expound and interprete the true certaine sense of Scripture neither in places difficult to be vnderstood nor in points necessary to be belieued And this is the first kind of reason drawne from the nature of scripture against the priuate spirits interpretation of it SVBDIV. 2. By reasons drawne from the priuate spirit which should expound Scripture SEcondly other reasons are drawne from the nature and condition of the priuate spirit which whether it be in a priuate person who wants lawfull ordination and authority or in publike Doctour Pastour or Bishop who diuided by heresy or schisme doth not conforme his spirit to the comon spirit of Gods Church and generall rule of Fayth yet that it cannot be a competent Iudge of fayth and decider of controuersies is proued by these reasons First because this priuate spirit is excluded as vnable and vnfit to interprete the scripture and that by scripture it selfe for S. Peter hauing commended the propheticall word or the wordes of Scripture made by the Prophets as being a candle shining in a darke place doth giue this Caueat as principally to be vnderstood that the sense of it is not to be made by any priuate interpretation that is though the scripture be a light yet as it is a light not to Gentils Iewes or Infidels who vnderstand it not so it is not a light to Heretikes who by the priuate spirit make a priuate interpretatiō of it why Because by mans will Prophesy was not at any tyme brought but the holy men of God spake inspired by the holy Ghost that is as the holy men of God the Apostles inspired by the holy Ghost spake and dictated the word of God when it was made so the interpreters of the same word ought not to bring in any exposition of the same word of God vpon their owne will and sense but vpon the inspiration of the same holy Ghost when by them it is interpreted so that we should receaue the sense of scripture from the same spirit from which we receaued the text of Scripture As therefore no priuate spirit but one and the same spirit of the Prophets and Apostles of Christ made the scripture so no priuate spirit but the common spirit of Pastours and Prelates of Christs Church should determine and iudge of the sense of Scripture Of which place and others see more in the first Chapter Secondly because as truth and faith is not priuate to one nor singular in any but common to all and generally receaued by all the faithfull for so saith S. Augustine Thy truth O Lord is neither myne nor this mans or that mans but all mens whom thou callest publickly to the Communion of it terribly admonishing vs not to haue it priuate least we be depriued of it for whosoeuer will challenge that as proper to himselfe which is giuen as common to all and will haue that only to himselfe which is for all men that man is driuen from the common to his owne that is from truth to falshood so also the spirit of truth is not priuate to any one but common to all the faithfull for if the spirit of the teacher be not common with the spirit of all teachers it is not a spirit as it ought to be which is one keeping an vnity of spirit in the bond of peace making mē of one mind in one spirit labouring together
continuance and duration for as it is a priuate spirit in euery one and can continue no longer then the person in whome it is and with whome it begins and ends liues and dyes so it hath no promise of Scripture to endure from age to age from generation to generation from Saboth to Saboth as long as the Sunne and Moone shall endure till the end of the world to the seed and seeds seed for all generations All which are yet promised to holy Church and the spirit of God in it Thirdly it wants immutability and freedome from alteration or change for as we see it changes in euery place tyme and person yea as often as the Moone breeding as S. Hilary sayd of the Arians a monthly yearly fayth and as one of them confesses What to day they hould you know but what to morrow neither you nor they can know in what head of religion do they agree who oppugne the Bishop of Rome if you examine all from the head to the foot you shall almost find nothing affirmed by one which another will not auerre to be wicked the Deuines do dayly differ from themselues coyning a monthly fayth Thus it changes in all doctrines and in opinions of Scripture some affirming this part to be scripture which others deny some inuenting one sense and others a contrary and it so alters from sect to sect from heresy to heresy from Catholike to Lutheran from this to Caluinisme from that to Anabaptisme from thence to Arianisme and so on to Iudaisme Turcisme and Atheisme And as this alteration de facto workes in Protestants so also it hath no promise of constancy that it is a Rocke a pillar a foundation as the Sunne before God as sure as the day and the night that it hath an euerlasting couenant which shall stand for euer and for an eternall glory and not be giuen ouer All which is yet promised to the Church and the spirit of God in it Fourthly it wants Visibility and publike manifestation to vs not only that it is the spirit of God of which before but much more in whom it remaines for as that which is in one cannot manifest it selfe to another so others cannot manifestly know that it is in any one Aske for example the Lutherans who follow Luther and his spirit the Caluinists who follow Caluin and his spirit the Anabaptistes who follow Rotman and his spirit the Aâ—ians who follow Seruetus and his spirit the Libertines who follow Quintinus and his spirit or any Precisian who follow a precise preacher and his spirit how they know that Luther doth enioy this spirit more then Caluin or Caluin more then Rotman or Rotman more then Seruetus or Seruetus more then Quintinus or any one of them more then the Pope and Catholike Church vnder him They can giue no reason more for one then for another shew no cause why they follow one spirit more then another or why they should be persuaded confirmed directed to the fayth of any one more then another This spirit therefore hath not the conspicuity and visibility of being as a tabernacle in the Sunne the Sunne in my light a candle vpon a candlesticke or seauen candlestickes in the Temple a citty vpon a hill a mountaine in the top of mountaines eleuated aboue the little hills that it may be seene and knowne of all the world All which yet are agreable to the Catholike Church and the spirit of God in it Fifthly this spirit wants combination or connexion by which it may combine all faithfull in one bond of Vnity and Concord and so distinguish a true Church from a false a right belieuing Catholike from a deceitfull heretike and a right way to heauen from an erroneous path to perdition It is priuate and particuler in euery man diuerse and contrary in most men It did suggest of old one beliefe for example in Sabellius another in Marcion another in Nestorius another in Apollinaris and Eutiches and it hath suggested of late one in Luther another in Zuinglius a third in Caluin a fourth in Munzer a fifth in Seruetus and aboue 220. in this last age in so many new Maisters and founders of new sects all whose hartes are diuided and like the Aegyptians run togeather against the Aegyptians and by diuision make the kingdome of Christ desolate And yet all of them call this their spirit of the Lord all build their beliefe vpon it all are directed by it in their contrary doctrine and beliefe Aske any one or all of them how they are instructed who they follow by what they are directed all answere by this spirit all appeale to this priuate spirit and yet all want that spirit which keepeth vnity of the spirit in the body of peace which should continue them in one minde in one agreement and iudgement in one hart and soule in one way and path and make them all one as Christ was one in his Father Which spirit notwithstanding resides and dwels in the Catholike Church Sixthly this spirit wants Vniuersality as vnable to resolue all doubts and questions which arise either about Scripture in the obscurity profundity and multiplicity of senses or in the seeming contradictions figuratiue locutions and seuerall interpretations of the wordes the various Texts and reading the many dissonanceâ— of yeares in numbring the different translation of words from the originall or which arise about the mysteries belieued as the vnity of the God-head the Trinity of persons in the Blessed Trinity the person the natures the wills the body the soule of Christ the nature of grace free-will sinne iustification sacraments Church prayer to Saints for the dead Purgatory and thousands such like which this spirit could neuer decide and end either in tymes ancient or of late but with contention it begunne all these differences in contention it proceeded in them and neuer ceased till by contention it consumed it selfe and ended them It cannot sufficiently conuince any one either Pagan or Infidell either Turke or Iew either Heretike or obstinate Person that they are in errour and haue not the spirit of God as well as true Christians It cannot conuert reduce or confirme any to the verity of true fayth who is either ignorant of Fayth or staggering in his fayth or obstinate against faith It can giue no probable reasons of persuasion propose no credible testimonies of inducement deliuer no conuincing arguments of certainty of fayth and doctrine and in effect can shew no grounds sufficient in prudence to persuade any iudicious man to accept as credible the religion of ChristiaÌ„s more then of Iewes Turkes or Pagans therefore it cannot extend it selfe to all Nations enlarge the place of his Tents stretch out the skins of his Tabernacles increase the sea with knowledge sucke the milke of Gentils and be nursed with the
the same motiue nor yet combining them in any vnity either of one and the same Church or of one and the same discipline or gouernment or of one and the same scripture and sense of it is apparent and proued First Because this spirit is priuate proper and peculiar in euery one without subordination to any without connexion with any or without dependance vpon any It is singular and seuerall in euery one hauing a kind of operation which is for the manner singular for the motiue different and for the effect opposit in euery one It wanteth one and the same either authority of God for warrant or reuelation from God for motiue or proposition by Church for surety or direction of one visible head for gouernment as a linke and combination of all the spirits in one vnity either of Sacraments seruice or ceremonies or of faith discipline and exposition of scripture Wherupon it withdraweth al men from the high way of vnity diuerts them into by-pathes of diuision conducts them into the downfall of schisme and heresy and so precipitates them headlong into a gulfe of infidelity and perdition 2. Because as experience teaches vs it hath hatched all the viperous sects schismes and heresies which this last age in such aboundance brought forth into the world It vpon the first breathing of the new Ghospell deuided the followers of it into Lutherans Sacramentarians Anabaptists and subdeuided the Lutherans againe into the Zealous the Ciuill and the disorderly Lutherans and subdeuided yet againe the zealous into 14. the ciuill into 20. and the disorderly into 7. subfactions and petty heresies It subdeuided the Anabaptists into 13. seuerall factions and the Sacramentaries into so many new opinions in seuerall Countries inuented by so many seuerall new maisters as that within the space of an 100. years fewer some as Gualter reckon vp 117. others as Rescius 170. others as Hedio a Protestāt within 30. yeares after Luther 130. all inuented and nourished by this spirit And for multiplicity of scripture senses it deuised as one 50. yeares ago collected no fewer then 80. and as another since hath obserued no fewer then 200. seuerall expositions all out of foure wordes Hoc est corpus meum Which dissention and diuision was euen in Caluins time so memorable and markable that he himselfe confesses that this age hath brought forth horrible monstrous sects so that many staggering and no◠knowing which to follow haue cast away all care of any religion at all By which is apparent that this Scripture neither doth nor can beget any vnity or concord in fayth and religion and so cannot be a fit instrument to beget and conserue fayth That it cannot be a meanes of certainty of Fayth SECT III. SECONDLY Fayth must be certaine and infallible to vs more certaine sayth S. Chrysostome are we of things we see not then of thinges we see Yea so certaine as that it admits no deliberate and voluntary doubt not only actuall but not so much as possible For as Fayth is an inward assent of the mind which we giue to that which God who is the prime verity and can neither deceaue nor be deceaued hath reuealed to vs by meanes of the preaching and teaching of the true Church so our assent must be as certaine as is the verity of God vpon which it dependes that is so certaine that it admit no more deliberate doubt incertainty or fallibility then doth the word of God vpon which it depends Which certainty of fayth because Luther Caluin and Zuinglius extend to euery mans particuler saluation they consequently affirme that euery man must be as certaine of his saluation as he is certaine there is a God that he can no more loose his saluation then Christ can loose it But that no such certainty can be in this priuate spirit I proue besides that which is in the former Chapter shewed by these reasons First because no certaine and infallible rule or ground can be giuen certainly and infallibly to know that this spirit in any man is a spirit of truth not of errour of light not of darknes of God not of Sathan or not humane therfore there is no reason why any should build vpon it as certaine Secondly because that they who admit a certainty of it admit it only in the persons who haue it not in others who follow them who haue it wherupon all who follow the spirit and doctrine of any other whosoeuer as the cōmon both people and preachers do follow that which to them is fallible and vncertaine and so build vpon a ground fallible and vncertaine Thirdly because experience conuinces that this spirit hath deceaued doth daily deceaue many for whatsoeuer either sense of Scripture or doctrine of faith or certainty of saluation the spirit of one man doth certainly assure him as true the spirit of another man doth as certainly assure him that the same is false as for example the spirit of Zuinglius Oecolampadius Caluin and other Sacramentaries assures them that the sense of Hoc est corpus meum is figuratiue that the body of Christ is not really and corporally present in the Sacrament and that they in this faith are infallibly sure of their saluation but the spirit of Luther assures him that the sense of the words is literall that Christs substance is really and corporally present with the substance of bread and that the Sacramentaries are heretiks and damned who hould the contrary The like doth the spirit of the Anabaptists Libertines and others assure them of other such places against both Lutherans and Caluinists And the spirit of the Arians assures them of the like against all the former And all this is wrought by this spirit all conceauing a certainty in it yet all opposit and condemning one another by it What certainty therfore can there be in any of these spirits what infallibility more in Luther then in Caluin what in Caluin more then in Rotman what in Rotman more then in Seruetus or what in any one of them more then in any other Sectary What can any one claime or challenge for the certainty of his spirit which the other cannot as infallibly claime and challenge for the certainty of his Euery one of these assure themselues that their spirit is of God Euery one of them all are certaine of their sense of scripture of their faith and of their saluation by it yet euery one defends a contrary faith inuents a contrary sense of scripture condemns the contrary part of heresy is certaine by his spirit of the others damnation as the other conceaue themselues certaine of their owne saluatiō What certainty therfore can there be amongst so opposit certainties Surely none but to be certaine that all of these spirits are most vncertaine and fallible yea wicked and damnable that the state of all who depend of them is pittifull and
all the Commandements or any of them is impossible 10. That no humane lawes do oblige in conscience to their performance 11. That the Sacraments chiefly Baptisme are seales and signes of predestination to glory of remission of sinnes and perseuerance in Gods fauour and that in Baptisme are forgiuen sinnes past and to come 12. That man by reason of Gods decree and originall sinne hath no liberty or freedome of will to do or auoid bad workes 13. That God hath ordained and predestinated vpon his meere will and pleasure without any cause giuen or so much as forseene all who are damned both to damnation and to sinne All which positions as they are auerred by the learned Protestants and preached to the people so they do ouerthrow all the articles of the Creed all the petitions of the Pater noster and all the precepts of the Ten Commandments and leade to all loosenesse and dissolution of life as shal be shewed SVBDIV. 1. In generall dectroying all fayth AND first that these Positions do quite ouerthrow take away all diuine and supernaturall fayth which is the first foundation and corner-stone of our spirituall building the first preparation to life and iustification the first root of all true vertue and good workes the first gate by which God enters into our soule the first light which shines in our vnderstanding the first true seruice which we offer to God and the first step by which we beginne to walke our iourney to heauen that this doctrine doth quite ouerthrow this fayth and all the articles of the Creed proposed in it is proued 1. Because they distinguish three sortes of fayth 1. Historicall of thinges reuealed and related in scripture and proposed by the Apostles in the Creed such as are the Trinity Incarnation Passion Resurrection and Ascension of Christ with all other articles which all Christians vsually belieue 2. Generall of promises in generall and all graces promised by Christ to all as the sending of the Holy Ghost the coming to iudgment the raysing of the dead and the like which are generall for all 3. Speciall of the promise made to euery man in particuler of his predestination iustification and saluation by which euery one is made infallibly certaine that his sinnes are forgiuen him and that he shal be saued Whereas I say they make these three sortes of Fayth the first and second of these Faithes to wit Historicall and Generall by which they belieue the articles of the Creed promises of God in general they affirme to be faigned not true fayth a shadow of Fayth not a real iustifying faith a Fayth which is common to the reprobate and damned euen to the Diuels themselues and only the third or Special fayth they assigne to be the true diuine and supernaturall iustifying fayth which hath for his obiect the speciall mercy of God to them in particuler applyed the certainty of remission of their sinnes assuredly past and security of their saluation infallibly to come by which they doe as much or more assuredly belieue their iustification and saluation then they do the B. Trinity Incarnation or the rest of the articles of Fayth Now if this speciall fayth be the only true diuine supernaturall and sauing fayth by it is belieued only one article of the Creed that not truly as shall appeare to wit Remission of sinnes and the Historicall and Generall fayth by which the rest of the articles are belieued be only a shadow of Fayth a fayth of the damned and Diuells then we haue no diuine and supernaturall fayth of the rest of the articles but belieue them only by a Faith which is a fained faith a shadow and no more a guift of God then the fayth of the damned and the Diuells in hell Therefore all true â—nd diuine beliefe of the articles of the Creed is by this special doctrine of speciall Fayth quite abolished and taken away from all Christians and nothing but a shadow of Fayth a fained and diabolicall faith left to them and so by one position of theirs is cut off all diuine fayth or beliefe of all the articles of the Creed Secondly whiles they deny all authority of Tradition Church Councels and Fathers and will belieue nothing but what they themselues find in Scripture and that as their priuate spirit interprets it While they make their spirit the iudge of all fayth all controuersies of fayth what is to be receaued or reiected belieued or condemned While I say they doe thus they may by the vertue of this spirit call in question the authority and credit of the Creed it selfe with the authours of it as not to be found in Scripture and the particuler articles they may either reiect as counterfeit intruded or els expound and interpret them as their spirit shal lead them Thus Luther and Caluin following Erasmus for Erasmus is sayd to haue layd the egge which Luther hatched to haue insinuated that which Luther assured to haue doubted of that which Luther downe right denyed made doubt of the authority of the Creed whether it was made by the Apostles or not And the Seruetians in Transiluania witnesse Canisius admit it but so farre as it agrees with the word of God interpreted no doubt by their spirit Thus did Beza by his spirit affirme that part of the sixt article he descended into hell to haue been thrust into the Creed Thus Caluin and Zuinglius following likewise Erasmus by their spirit affirmed that part of the tenth article the Communion of Saints to haue beene intruded into this Creed out of some other Creed and not to haue beene found in the ancient Creeds Thus Luther by his spirit changed in his Germane Creed the word Catholike Church into Christian Church And Beza reiected the same word Catholike as most vaine and wicked And thus by their Glosses and expositions vpon many articles as not pleasing their tast they wrest diuers as shall appeare from their natiue proper sense for example he descended into hell that is he descended into the graue so make a new Creed in sense and meaning agreable to their spirit and the doctrine of it Of which who will haue a full view let him read Andr. Iur. his Nullus and Nemo and Fitzsimons vpon the Masse where their many absurd glosses and expositions are at large discouered and confuted SVBDIV. 2. In particuler against all the twelue Articles of the Creed THIRDL Y because by this doctrine and these Doctours are oppugned in particuler all the mysteries of fayth in euery article of the Creed which by this briefe enumeration of euery one shal be made manifest And first in the first article attributed to S. Peter I follow the diuision of S. S. Augustine and Doctour Kellison is oppugned 1. The faith and beliefe of all the articles in generall in the word Credo by all who hould that it is
heare him alwayes loue him alwayes assist him alwayes comfort him that no feare doubt wauering or perturbation did or could euer enter into his will or vnderstanding yea that all that time of his passion his soule had the perfect vision and fruition of God and only his sensible partes endured those paines and torments of the crosse Tenthly As for his descending into hell they derogate from it and dishonour him in that they affirme he descended either only to the graue in body or also to the lower hell in soule to suffer the paines of it either before his death on the crosse or after it in hell but not to haue freed the Patriarchs from Limbus by the presence of his soule there We honour it in belieuing that he descended in soule further then to the graue to which he only descended in body but not so far as to suffer the paines of hell in soule but only to the Limbus patrum where he gaue the Patriarches there detained present liberty fruition of eternall hapinesse afterwards carried them with him to the place of glory and so triumphed ouer hell led aptiuity Ccaptiue Eleuenthly From his resurrection and ascension they derogate and dishonour him both by denying him the subtility or penetration of his body wherby he was able to passe through either the stone of the sepulcher at his resurrection or the dores of the house at his entrance to his disciples or the hardnesse of the heauens at his ascension all which they wil haue either dissolued or opened or diuided We honour attribut more dignity to the same belieuing that by the gift of subtility or penetratioÌ„ his body did pierce passe through the stone the dores and the heauens at his resurrection and ascension as it did also his Mothers wombe at his natiuity with out any diuision dissolution or detriment to the nature of either the one or the other in which also he shewed his subtility and consequently his impassibility or immortality Twefthly From his adoration and inuocation by vs as he is now in heauen they derogate and dishonour him in affirming that as man he is not to be adored or inuocated by vs. We honour him as man so far that we bow downe at the name of Iesus praying to him with the blind man the Cananean saying Sonne of Dauid haue mercy on vs And fall down with the Sages the womeÌ„ adore him In al which and many more as they by their priuate spirit the doctrine of it do derogate take from Christ his honour his power his goodnesse his beatitude his knowledge his sanctity his certainty of saluation his adoration and the vertue and power of his passion redemption resurrection ascension so do we in our Catholike doctrine attribute to same due honour and dignity so both in our doctrine practise giue more honour praise power and glory to God and to Iesus Christ then they do either in doctrine or practise Thirdly For the Saints and blessed soules in heauen they dishonour them and take from them 1. Their state of beatitude affirming as Luther and Caluin do that they yet sleepe and neither know what we do nor yet enioy any present glory and beatitude till the day of Iudgment 2. Their perfection of Sanctity in affirming as Caluin doth both of Angels and Saints that their obedience is imperfect that their iustice is defectiue and doth not satisfy God that their works require pardon and that in them is folly vanity and frailty 3. Their power of doing miracles by the gift of God which Beza Piscator Vrsinus and Perkins â—hould to be a vertue proper only to God not communicated to any creature man or Saint 4. Their difference and degree or honour affirming that all are equall in glory beatitude and reward and that no lawrels or crownes of accidentall beatitude are due to Martyrs Confessours or Virgins 5. Their respect and esteeme with God denying that God doth either apply in any sort their merits to vs or doth help and respect vs for their prayers 6. Their knowledge of vs and our affaires on earth denying that they heare vnderstand or know vs or any thing we do heere on earth 7. Their charity towardes vs affirming they neither at our intercessious sollicite or pray to God for vs nor offer vp any petitions and miseries of ours to God 8. Their honour and inuocation by vs denying it to be lawfull to worship them to honour theÌ„ to inuocate them or so much as saith Luther to imitate and follow their example 9. The custody and â—uition of Angels ouer vs and their hierarchies and orders in heauen denying or at least doubting of the custody of our Angell guardian the difference of al Hierarchies and orders among Angels In al which we and our doctrine on the contrary do attribute to them perfect and present beatitude in their soules complete obedience in their performing the will of God vpright Sanctity in all their actions extraordinary power in working miracles notable difference of degrees of glory eminent knowledge in vnderstanding our prayers excellent charity in making intercession for vs and due honour and veneration in giuing them adoration inuocation and imitation befitting both the Saints for their prayers for vs and the Angels for their custody of vs. Fourthly For the word of God they abuse it take 1. From iâ— one first and principall part of it to wit all the vnwritten word or which is diuine vnwritten tradition 2. From the written word they chop and cut off from the old Testament fourteene peeces or partes and some of them from the new Testament seauen whole bookes from the Canon of scripture 3. For the translation of scripture they reiect the ancient and follow euery nation euery congregation and euery person a new translation which best pleases them therby leaue no certainty of the verity of any 4. For the sense of scripture they contemne that which the spirit of God did inspire to the ancient Fathers Councels Church and follow that which euery mans priuate spirit suggests and therby follow not the meaning of the spirit of God but that of their owne spirit 5. For their faith grounded vpon scripture they belieue only those points which their spirit finds in that part translation and sense which they chose and therby make an vncertaine imperfect mained kind of faith and religion 6. For their Iudge and meanes to try which is scripture and which is true sense of it they admit not any infallible Iudgment either of Church or of CouÌ„cels or of Pastours but leaue to euery man to choose himself what he will belieue to iudge and follow whom he pleases in his beliefe wherby they can haue neither any vnity in faith not any certainty of scripture of scripture sense We in our doctrine do admit for the word of
so a spirituall man iudges of all thinges in generall that is both of spirituall thinges which are diuine and mysticall and also of humane thinges which are terrene and sensuall but a sensuall man iudges only of temporall thinges of the world and not of spirituall which are of God The reason therfore is de generibus singulorum that a spirituall man iudges of all sortes of thinges both diuine humane but not de singulis generunt that he can iudge in particuler of all kindes or spirituall thinges as when a man is sayd to eat of all thinges it is meant that he eates of all kinds of meat both flesh and fish not of euery particuler peece of both 2. Euery spirituall man doth iudge spirituall thinges but according to such rules and directions as euery thing is to be iudged that is thinges manifest and certaine he iudges according as they are iudged already and determined thinges vncertaine and obscure according to the rule of Fayth and the authority and testimony of Councels Fathers Tradition and Church as before is explicated not according to his owne selfe-seeming spirit and conceit in which his spirit is still subordinate to the spirit of Gods Church and directed by it 3. Because euery faithfull Christian is not alwayes spirituall that is perfect hauing his senses exercised in the discerning of good and euill for some haue need of milke and not of strong meat and euery one that is partaker of milke it vnskilful of the word of iustice for he is a child Therfore this iudgment especially of misteries of faith is not for al imperfect though faithfull Christians but only for persons spirituall that is perfect and vnderstanding in spiritual learning wisdome And so it makes nothing for the priuate spirits iudgment in euery faithfull Christian And because spirituall persons haue not euery one a spirit for all spirituall things for to one certes by the spirit is giuen the word of wisdome and to another the word of knowledge according to the same spirit and to another Prophecy to another discerning of spirits all which one and the same spirit worketh And all are not Apostles Prophets or Doctours nor worke miracles do cures or speake with tongues And because some mēbers are more some lesse honourable or base some more weake some lesse and some haue offices functions some more honourable some lesse some to see and direct others to walke and be directed euery one according to his nature function though one and the same spirit worke all these therefore all persons who are spirituall haue not all spirituall offices guifts but some the guifts of prayer and contemplation some of mortification and humiliation some of obedience patience others of discerning of spirits and others to whō by their office it belongs of iudging of faith and scripture as before And therefore though spirituall men iudge all things spirituall and temporall yet euery spirituall man doth not infallibly iudge and discerne euery spirituall thing no more then euery faculty of the soule as sensitiue vegitatiue or rationall doth performe all and euery function of feeling growing and reasoning but euery one his proper function And as the function of the eye is only to see and of the hāds to worke and the feet to walke so they who will giue the function of seeing and iudging of the sense of scripture and misteries of faith to euery person in the body of the Church do as much as if one should attribut the function of seeing to the handes and feet for as in a body naturall so in the body mysticall which is S. Pauls comparison some are principal members some inferiour so euery one hath his proper function in the Church as the bishops are eyes to discerne truth the princes are armes to defend the body and the people are the rest of the parts of the body to be directed The function therfore of one is not to be attributed to another but euery one in his place and degree is to exercise his owne function in his proper office and worke By which is apparent that those and such like places of scripture do make nothing for the authority and power of this priuate spirit in euery one to discerne and iudge of all places of scripture and misteries of faith except the Protestants as they attribut to euery spirit power to do euery thing so they will out of euery place of scripture inferre any thing so ex quolibet proue quodlibet as their spirit doth direct and teach them And thus much of the first manner of arguments or obiections drawne from the guift of the spirit of God and grace impertinently applied to proue this their priuate spirits authority Other obiections answered SECT III. THE second manner of obiections are drawne from the meanes which are prescribed in scripture for the due right Vnderstanding of holy scripture which are prayer meditation and diligent seeking enquiring out the true sense of scripture out of scripture and such like by which the Protestants seeme to backe much their spirits proceeding for so doth Caluin professe to imbrace that sense of scripture which by meditation annexed the spirit of God doth suggest by vertue of which spirit he contemns all what any humane wisdone can oppose For which they obiect that Dauid did meditat day night in the law of God That Timothy did from his Childhood learne the Scripture which might instruct him That S. Peter did will them to attend and looke into the propheticall word as to a candell shining in a darke place That S. Paul affirmes that faith faithful persons are built vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles That they of Beroea did search the scriptures if the things were so as Paul did teach And that Christ did will the Iewes to search the Scriptures For all which we are to obserue 1. That these meanes are good and profitable but not sufficient of themselues for a certaine and infallible exposition of scripture for besides them is required the infallible assistance of the holy Ghost for an infallible sense of scripture to be relied vpō 2. That these meanes are to be vsed by those who haue power and authority to expound scripture to whom though they be necessary yet are they not of themselues either sufficient or infallible either to euery priuate person or to others without other helpes and assistances of the holy Ghost 3. That priuate persons when they vse apply duely these meanes may giue a probable exposition of scripture either for their owne consolation and confirmation in faith or for the edification and aduise of others but cannot rely vpon it either as a sole and solid foundation of their beliefe or as a generall rule for the true and certaine exposition of all the difficult and abstruse places of scripture For as S. Augustine saith such is the
profundity of holy scriptures that though his wit was better his leasure more and his diligence greater yet he might from his child-hood tiâ—l his old age profit in the vnderstanding of them not for that so much of them as is necessary to saluation is so hardly to be atteined but for that when once ones faith is grounded vpon them so many and manifold misteries remaine for the more intelligent proficients inuolued in the words and the maâ—ter that the moâ—t aged witty and industrious may say when he is become perfect then he begins For which elswhere he professes that he is ignorant of more things in scripture then he knowes Therfore only prayer meditation and study will not surfice for euery one to find out the true and certaine sense of euery place of Scripture which for euery one to assume to himselfe would not be a certainty of faith but presumption of pride And the same which is sayd of Prayer Meditation and study may be sayd of skill of tongues conference of originall texts and other places and of consideration of antecedents and consequents of phrases and the like Of which see Stapleton Which supposed the answere to all the former obiections is facile First Dauid did read and study the Scripture but he did it for his priuate consolation and meditation not for his foundation in fayth in which he was before grounded 2. Timothy did read and study them from his childhood but to learne the sense and meaning of them of his Maisters and teachers not to be iudge and censurer of them and that for his instruction in manners not for his doctrine of fayth which he receaued from his Ancestours not from his owne reading of Scripture 3. S. Peter did will them to attend to the propheticall doctrine but not to interprete it according to euery ones priuate spirit and proper interpretation which he forbids saying No prophesy of Scripture is made by priuate interpretation much lesse with a neglect of the rules and grounds of fayth or with a contempt of the Pastours and Superiours of the Church of God preferring its owne before their exposition 4. S. Paul affirmes that we must be built vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles that is not only vpon the written word of the Apostles or Prophets for many had fayth and were Cittizens of Saints and Domesticals of God before any scripture or writing of the Apostles was extant and many built their fayth vpon the Apostles who writ nothing at all but vpon the doctrine and fayth reueiled to the Apostles and by them left by preaching or writing to posterity and as such by the Church proposed to vs. Out of which nothing can be inferred for making the scripture much lesse the priuate spirit interpreting it the sole or sufficient ground of Fayth Againe taking the foundation either for the doctrine or writinges of the Apostles and they who are built vpon it or for principall partes or for the body of the Church we may consider first the foundation of doctrine either in it selfe and so as being the truth reuealed it is the ground of fayth or in respect of vs as by vs it is accepted and so it relyes vpon the Pastours and Prelates of the Church by whome it is proposed to vs as reuealed and for whose authority we receaue it as reuealed Secondly we may consider the Church either as it is the whole body of all faythfull in all tymes especially after the Apostles and so it is built vpon the doctrine preached and written or as it signifies the first heads and directours of it to wit the Apostles and so it is built immediatly vpon Christ and the holy Ghost reuealing to them that doctrin and scripture which they haue left to posterity and which they preach and propose to vs and in this sense the Church that is the Apostles and first Pastours were before the doctrine was either preached or written by them so were the foundation of their doctrine and preaching of it to vs though to the rest of the faythfull the doctrine preached and written by them is the foundation vpoÌ„ which their fayth is built Which answere doth not only cleare the Scripture for hauing any priuate spirit as Iudge ouer it but also declares how the Church is built vpon the doctrine of the Apostles or Prophets taking the Prophets eyther for the writings of the Prophets in the old Testament or for the Interpreters of the Apostles writing in the new and also how the Church in the sense before declared is the ground of the Apostolical and propheticall doctrine reuealed to the Church and the first Pastours of it and by them left to vs who receaue it from them and their authority and so from the Church 5. They of Beörea did search the scriptures whether those thinges were so as Paul declared that is not so that by searching the scripture they did make themselues and their spirit iudge of the Apostolicall doctrine preached out of scripture but so that either being nor yet fully conuerted and satisfyed they would with diligence and in humility enquire further of the doctrine preached which is alwayes permitted and aduised to all for otherwise he that giueth credit quickly is light of hart or that being satisfyed they would as Catholicke Doctours do search out conferre and vnderstand those places of scripture which Paul did alleadge and thereby the more strongly confirme themselues and better satisfy others in Fayth In which as they did proceed prudently and piously and we permit and aduise euery learned Catholike to do the like so they did no more make either their spirit or the Scripture interpreted by their spirit iudge of the Apostles doctrine then if one for searching the testimonyes of S. Augustine which are cyted by Bellarmine should therby be sayd to make himselfe iudge of Bellarmine his doctrine or as one searching the places cited by Caluin to see if they be as they are by him cited should thereby make himselfe iudge of Caluin and his doctrine Which to inferre out of their actions as it is absurd so is it to inferre that the Beröeans made themselues iudges of S. Pauls doctrine out of the Beröeans seeking out the places which S. Paul alleadged 6. Our Sauiour willed the Iewes to search the Scripture it is true but which Iewes to wit those who were learned and how Not so that he would make them and their priuate spirits iudges of Scriptures or the truth found in them but that he would haue them being yet incredulous studiously to informe themselues of him being the true Messias out of those Scriptures which they belieued already to be true and to beare true witnesse of the true Messias which is no more then to persuade any Protestant to read Scriptures Fathers and Catholike authours and out of them to informe himselfe of the verity of Catholike Religion which is to search out
for the faith of the ghospel but it is a spirit of dissentiō which comes in his owne name speaketh lies of it selfe leadeth disciples after it selfe and seeketh as a thiefe to kill and destroy And if the spirit of the hearer be not conformable to the teacher then it is not a spirit of God nor of truth because he who is borne of God heareth the voice of the spirit and to heare the voice of vs saith S. Iohn that is of the Pastour is a signe to discerne who knows God and who hath the spirit of truth not falshood But if he on the contrary do follow a stranger do heare the voice of strangers do harken to a Prophet who ariseth and saith let vs follow strang Gods whom thou knowest not that is new Pastours vnknowne who they are or whence they come it is a signe of a spirit which followes not God nor is directed in truth Therfore the spirit of God is not a spirit priuate and singular by it selfe but a spirit common and generall to all the faithfull vniting the sheepheard with the flocke and the flocke with the sheepheard both in the fold of Iesus Christ in vnity of one spirit and faith Thirdly Because this priuate spirit is not only euill but also most vncertaine and fallible for it is vncertaine in whom it is whether in Luther Caluin Seruetus or Rotmā and why not as well in Bellarmine as in any of them It is vncertaine to him who imagines he hath it whether it be the spirit of God of nature or of Sathan and most vncertaine altogeather vnknowne to any but him who challengeth it It is vncertaine whether that sense it suggests be the certaine meaning of the holy Ghost or the inuention of ones owne braine It is vncertaine whether those interpreters of scriptures which follow it and others who follow them as Caluin Luther Osiander Beza or others do expound the scripture in the sense of the holy Ghost or of their owne It could not accord the Lutheran Deuines of Saxony in the Conference at Altemburge 1568. whether the scripture was to be receiued as interpreted by Luther only as the Duks Deuines of Iene Lipsia prescribed or as by Luther and Melācthon also as the Electours Deuines of Wittemberge resolued It could not agree Luther Melancthon with Zwinglius Oecolampadius at Marspurge 1529. about the sense of these words Hoc est corpus meum whether they are meant properly or figuratiuely It could not combine in vnity at Wormes 1557. the twelue Catholicke Doctours with the twelue Lutheran about many points of controuersy nor the Lutheran Doctours among themselues of whom seauen the maior part excluded fiue the lesser that is Amsdorpius Gallus and others the rigid Lutherans It cannot pacify to this day the dissentions about the sense of scripture betweene the Lutherans Swinglians Caluinists Vbiquitaries Osiandrians Swenk feldians Trinitarians Puritans Familists Anabaptists and others in number infinite and in contention vnplacable So vncertaine it is in all so vncertaine it leaues all Fourthly Because it is not only false and vncertaine in expounding the scripture but also it is opposit to the spirit and iudgement of the whole Church of all generall Councels and of all auncient Fathers reiecting and condemning them and preferring it selfe in euery preacher or Parochian before them It will in euery vnlearned Protestant with Caluin examine all the spirits of all men according to the rule of the word of God it selfe I say will examine and iudge them It will with Luther affirme and stand to it also that it will permit none to be iudges but all to be obedient to it It will with Whitaker resolue that all iudgment of Fathers Councels and Church is only humane and only its owne is diuine of which contempt of Fathers and Councels see the first Part Chap. 5. Fifthly Because it is not only false fallible opposite to the spirit of Gods Church but is the very author and supporter of all heresies as Stapleton well notes saying Out of this priuate spirit to which they stand stifly for the exposition of scripture haue issued and flowed all the stincke of heresies and new opinions which haue infected the whole world And indeed as euery hereticke diuided himselfe from the Church and forsooke the spirit of it so by his new spirit he inuented a new heresy of his owne and sought to draw people after him All which both concerning heresies rebellions shal in the third Part at large be demonstrated Sixtly Because all the partes and properties of an infallible Iudge are wanting in this spirit as shall appeare in the next Chapter And thus much against the priuat spirits authority of expounding scriptures by reasons drawne from the obscurity fecundity and profundity of scripture and from the falsity fallibility and vncertainty of this spirit Out of which it doth follow first that since the Protestants build their saluation only vpon faith and their faith only vpon the scripture and the scripture and the sense of it only vpon the spirit which is so vncertaine fallible and doubtfull therefore their whole faith and state of saluation is very vncertaine fallible and doubtfull as builded vpon a ground so vncertaine fallible and doubtfull 2. It followes that they who in shew rely so much vpon scripture who extoll it so much read it so diligently seeme to be so cunning in it and to build so much on it do not indeed rely build vpon the scripture but vpon their owne spirit or conceit by which they set vpon the scripture what sense they please and draw the sense to what doctrine they please and make the doctrine to serue to what times and turns to what ends and vses they please 3. It followes that the Catholikes whom the Protestantes so much accuse of neglect of scripture do more solidly safely rely on it then the Protestants do and do with more security and certainty ground their faith vpon it then they do for the Catholikes receiue the scripture as the word of God as much as they more parts of it then they they reuerence it as much as they and haue kept it from corruption longer then they They ground their faith and beliefe vpon it as strongly as they did the same before it was knowne to them yea deliuered it to them and to many mo besides them For the true sense and right vnderstanding of it they do not rely vpon euery mans priuate spirit or conceit as they do but vpon the iudgement of the Church infallibly assisted by the holy ghost vpon the testimony of the catholike and apostolicke rule of faith vpon the conformity of the auncient practise and obseruation of the Church vpon the generall consent of the holy and learned Fathers and doctors of auncient time vpon the infallible decrees of general and