finer manner but simply rejecteth all eating of his flesh with the bodily mouth We may not therefore forge any corporall eating in the Supper contrary to the Gospel 6. The conceit of a corporall presence and feeding on Christs flesh under the bread is wholly different and diverse from the formall consideration of a Sacrament Therefore it is to be rejected The Antecedent is proved because it cannot be accounted either for the signe or the thing signified of which two every Sacrament wholly consisteth It is not the signe or sacrament because it is not object to the senses and if it were there is nothing which it might signifie And further it hath no proportion or similitude with the thing that is with the spirituall eating Neither can it be said to be the thing signified seeing the Scripture no where speaketh of an essentiall transfusion and reall commixtion of Christs flesh with our bodies neither can there be any except wee entertain the follies and dreams of Eutychians and Swenckfeldians For the sacraments testifie of those blessings only and them onely doe they seale unto us which are contained in the promise of the Gospel Againe it is not the thing signified because this eating may be without faith and is common to the godly and ungodly But the things signified in the sacraments are received by faith alone and of the faithfull and godly alone Besides if it were the thing signified none had ever beene sayed or at any time should have beene saved without it For in all Sacraments the things signified are the same and are given to all that are to be saved because they are the benefits of the Messias comprehended in the promise of the Gospel which benefits are the same unto all and without them no man is saved Therefore no place is left for a substantiall presence and mouthy eating of Christs body under the bread or under the forme of bread and this substantiall presence and mouthy eating is indeed nothing but a vaine name and Idoll in the world Object The corporall eating is a signe of the spirituall eating and a singular confirmation of faith Therefore Christs body is also a Sacrament or signe and invisible grace is the thing signified Answ The Antecedent is denied 1. Because Christs flesh under the bread is invisible Therefore it cannot signifie another invisible thing or strengthen faith For Sacraments or signes ought to be visible so that it deserveth not saith Erasmus to be called a Sacrament which is not accomplished by an externall signe For to this end and use are they given of God that they may as it were effectually shew to our outward senses that which is promised in the Word and performed by the holy Ghost in our hearts that they may be visible testimonies and pledges of the promise of grace exhibited and applyed Whence is that saying of Austine a Sacrament is a visible word And Lib. 19. cap. 18. cont Fault lib. 2. cap. 1. De Doct. Christ de Catech-rud ca. 26. Prosp in sentent it is a visible forme of invisible grace And A signe is a thing besides that forme which it presenteth to our senses causing something else by it selfe to come into the knowledge And the signes indeed of divine things are visible but the things themselves are invisible And that of Prosper The sacrifice of the Church consisteth in two things in the visible forme of elements and the invisible flesh and bloud of our Lord Jesus Christ in the Sacrament or signe and in the thing of the Sacrament that is the body of Christ Therefore no thing or action which is invisible insensible and not naturall can make the nature or appellation of a Sacrament And consequently they who will have Christs flesh in under or with the bread to be a Sacrament or will have the bread to be transsubstantiated into his flesh let them shew us a visible or sensible eating of it in the Supper lest they seeme to dissent from the ancient Fathers 2. There must be an analogy and proportion betweene the signe or Sacrament and the thing signified or the thing of the Sacrament For Except the Sacraments saith Austine had some similitude of those things whereof they are Sacraments they were not verily and Sacraments Now Epist 23. ad Bonifacium if Christ flesh be also a Sacrament and the thing of those Sacraments be invisible grace what proportion then and similitude shall there be between the two Sacraments but seeing there can be none it followeth that Christs flesh may not be called a Sacrament as being no lesse the thing it selfe of the Sacrament then eternall salvation signified by way of proportion by visible bread as by a signe Wherefore the sacramentall eating which is done naturally by the mouth doth not belong unto the body of Christ considered by it selfe in any physicall or naturall respect because unto this sacramentall eating the externall signes only are object in their owne nature S. Austine demanding how bread is the body of Christ and wine his bloud These saith he brethren are therefore called Sacraments because in them one thing is seene and another thing understood That which is seene Serm-ad Infant hath a corporall forme that which is understood hath a spirituall fruit If then thou wilt understand the body of Christ here the Apostle speaketh to the faithfull Yee ar the body of Christ and his members If then yee be the body of Christ and his members your mystery is set on the table c. 7. The communion of Christ which is promised in his Word and sealed in his Sacraments is not corporall but spirituall But the communion of Christ which is given in the Supper is the same with that which is promised in the Word and sealed in all other Sacraments Therefore the communion of Christ in the Supper is not corporall but spirituall The Major is manifest For in the Gospel no other communion is delivered or specified but that which is spirituall The Minor also is evident because the same benefits are proposed in all the promises of the Gospel which are presented and offered in the Sacraments For the Sacraments are the visible word because they promise that which the Word promiseth by visible signes and are seales of the promise of the same grace 8. There is one and the same signification of all the Sacraments of the Old and New Testament and in them one and the same communion of Christ But the signification of all other Sacraments and their communion is spirituall onely Therefore there is no other in the Supper The Minor is granted on all sides The Major is demonstrated by the Apostle in these words 1 Cor. 12.13 10.2 By one spirit we are all baptized into one body And All were baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea and did all cate the same spirituall meate Object There is not the same thing signified of all Sacraments For in Baptisme the thing
that had not the Sonne of God revealed it unto us out of his Fathers bosome no wit of men or Angels could have attained unto it In their subjects They vary in their subjects and matter which they handle For the doctrine of the Church comprehendeth the full perfect and entire sense both of the Law and Gospel but Philosophy is quite ignorant of the Gospel and omitteth the principall parts of the Law and rawly and obscurely propoundeth that small portion it retaineth concerning discipline and externall duties drawn but out of some few precepts of the Decalogue It teacherh us also other arts and sciences meete and serviceable for mans life as Logick Physick and the Mathematickes all which are not delivered in Church doctrine but have their proper necessary use in handling and learning the same In their effects They concurre not in their severall effects For the doctrine of the Church alone sheweth us the originall of all evils and mans misery to wit the fall disobedience or sin of our first parents Moreover it ministreth true and lively comfort unto our consciences pointing out the meanes by which wee may wade out of the danger of sin and death and assuring us of life eternall through Christ As for Philosophy it knoweth not the cause of our evils neither yeeldeth it us any sound comfort or consolation Philosophy hath certain comforts common unto her with Divinity Comforts common both to Philosophy and Divinity such are 1. The providence of God 2. The necessity of obeying of God 3. A good conscience 4. The worthinesse of vertue 5. The finall causes or the ends which vertue proposeth 6. The examples of others 7. Hope of reward 8. A comparing of events because a lesse evil compared unto a greater carrieth a shew and shadow of good but true comforts against sinne and death are proper to the Church Comforts proper to Gods Church such as are 1. Free remission of sins by and for Christ 2. The grace and presence of God in our very miseries 3. Our finall delivery and life everlasting Wherefore Philosophy though in respect of Divinity it be unperfect and faile in these premisses yet it never impugneth Divinity Whatsoever erroneous opinions contrary to the true doctrine of the Church occurre in the writings of Philosophers or are cited out of Philosophy to overthrow Scripture all these are either no way Philosophicall but the vaine sleights of mans wit and very biles and sores of true Philosophy such as was the opinion of Aristotle concerning the eternity of the world and of Epicurus touching the mortality of the soule and such like or else they are indeed Philosophicall opinions but unfitly applyed to Divinity The use of these differences in doctrine These maine differences between Christian doctrine and other Religions and Philosophy also are very worthy observation for these ends 1. That Gods glory be no way impaired of us but reserved wholly unto himselfe which cannot be unlesse wee acknowledge and confesse in the face and eye of the world whatsoever he hath precisely commanded us to beleeve either concerning himselfe or his will and that wee adde nothing of our owne braine unto that which hee hath revealed For God cannot be mingled with Idols nor his truth confounded with Satans forgeries without high dishonour to his name 2. That we hazzard not nor endanger our salvation which might happen if erroneously we should imbrace for true Religion any Schismaticall doctrine or heathenish Philosophy 3. That our faith and comfort in Christ Jesus might be strengthened and confirmed which falleth out when wee discerne the perfection of the doctrine of the Church before all other Religions how many important and weighty matters are found in our Religion which are wanting in others What are the causes why they alone are saved who professe this doctrine and other Religions with their Sectaries and adherents are damned and of God rejected Finally that we separate our selves from Epicures and Academicks who either make a mockery of pietie and godlinesse or so rack Religion that they thinke every man in every Religion shall be saved wresting in this sense that saying of the Apostle The just man shall live by HIS faith Now these Epicures are not worthy the answering Rom. 1.17 Hab. 2.4 as for those Academicks they manifestly falsifie the sentence and meaning of the Apostle and are easily refuted For the pronoune HIS in no sort signifieth whatsoever faith every man frameth unto himselfe but the true Catholike faith particularly appropriated unto every man and this word HIS standeth in opposition against any other mans faith though it be a true and good faith and thwarteth and crosseth also the opinion of Justification by works So that the naturall sense of that Text is The just man is justified not by the works of the Law but by faith alone in Christ and that by his owne private faith not by the faith of another man 4 Whence it may appeare that the doctrine of the Church alone was delivered of God 5 By what testimonies the certainty of Christian Religion or Church-doctrine is confirmed GOD in the very creation of the world put this bridle in the mouth of all reasonable creatures that no man without extreame and manifest impudeney such as was the Divell in Paradise durst say that any thing if it were once apparently known to have been spoken or commanded by God might be called into question or that any man might refuse to obey it Here-hence are those things so often inculcated in the Prophets Hearken O heavens and hearken O earth for the Lord hath spoken Thus saith the Lord. The word of the Lord came to Esaias Jeremias c. Sith therefore it appeareth that the bookes of the Old and New Testament are the words of God there is no place left of doubting whether that be the true Religion and Doctrine which is contained in them but whether these books were written by divine instinct and by what proofes and testimonies we are certaine of so great a matter this is a question not to be let passe of us Wherefore this question is necessary For except this above all other things remaine stedfast and immoveable that whatsoever we read in the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles doth as truly declare the will of God unto us as if we did heare God openly speaking tous from heaven it cannot chuse but that the very foundation and whole certainty of Christian Religion must be weakned Wherefore it is a consideration worthy those who are desirous of the glory of God and doe seek for sure comfort to enquire whence it may appeare unto us The first part The authority of the Scripture doth depend on the Church that the holy Scripture is the Word of God To this question now long since answer hath been made by the Papists that forsooth it is not otherwise certaine then because the Church doth confirme it by her testimony But we
Sciences so in the study of Divinity wee hardly and slowly conceive the grounds thereof nay all our knowledge is confuse and imperfect unlesse every part of the whole doctrine be delivered by the Professors and Readers and conceived by the Auditors and Hearers in some method and order Orderly delivery thereof in publick That the Students of Divinity may hereafter plainly and orderly deliver unto their auditory a briefe summe of this whole doctrine necessary it is that they themselves first carry in their understanding a complete frame as it were and perfect body thereof Invention and judgement of the interpretation of Scripture It is farther necessary to the finding out and judging of the true and naturall interpretation of Scripture which whereas it ought to square with faith that is to say to impeach no point of this heavenly doctrine of necessity the Interpreter must have an absolute knowledge of the main grounds and foundation thereof Examination of controversies in the Church It is needfull for the increase of judgement in Ecclesiasticall controversies which are divers difficult and dangerous lest perhaps otherwise we be carried head-long from truth into errour 3 Reading and meditation The third course of the study of Divinity is the reading and diligent meditation of the Scripture or holy Writ And this is the highest degree of the study of Divinity for which Catechisme and Common places are learned to wit that we may come furnished to the reading understanding and propounding of the holy Scripture For Catechisme and Common places as they are taken out of the Scripture and are directed by the Scripture as by their rule so againe they conduct and lead us as it were by the hand unto the Scripture Catechisme pertaineth unto the first part of the study of Divinity whereof it followeth that we presently discourse The Speciall Preambles touching CATECHISME THE Speciall Prefaces touching CATECHISME are these five which follow 1 What Catechising or Catechisme is 2 Whether it hath bin alwaies practised and of the originall thereof in the Church 3 What are the chiefe points thereof 4 The reasons why it is necessary 5 What is the scope and end thereof 1 What Catechisme is THE Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cometh from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is derived from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The significations of the word Catechisme both these words signifie in their common and largest sense to resound to instruct by word of mouth and to rehearse another mans sayings But properly to teach the rudiments and elements of any doctrine whatsoever and more properly in Church phrase to deliver the first principles of Christian Religion in which sense we read it used Luke 1.4 Acts 18.25 Gal. 6.6 c. So then this word Catechisme signifieth in a generall and common sense the first briefe and A B C Lecture in whatsoever doctrine delivered by word of mouth But as the Church useth it it signifieth an institution of the ruder sort in the elements of Christian doctrine Wherefore Catechisme is a briefe and plaine exposition and a rehearsall of Christian doctrine The definition of Catechisme framed for the capacity of the ruder sort select and gathered out of the writings of the Prophets and Apostles and drawne into certaine questions and answers Or Catechisme is a briefe summe of the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles delivered by mouth unto the simple and ignorant and exacted or required againe at their hands What the Catechumeni in the Primitive Church were and how many sorts of them 1 Ancient Converts Catechumeni in the Primitive Church were those who learned the Catechisme that is to say such as were now of the Church and were instructed in the principles and beginnings of Christian Religion Of the Catechumeni there were two sorts Some of good yeares and ripe age who of Jewes and Gentiles became Christians but were not yet baptised These were first instructed in the Catechisme and afterwards baptised and admitted to the Lords supper Such a Catechumene was Augustine when of a Manichee hee became a Christian Austen and hee whiles hee was yet but a Catechumene wrote many bookes before hee was baptised of Ambrose Ambrose Such a Catechumene was Ambrose when hee was chosen Bishop of Millaine the urgent necessity of the state of that Church so requiring for suppressing the pestilent heresie wherewith the Arrians had infected it Otherwise Paul forbiddeth a Novice or Catechumene to be chosen Bishop For the Neophiti or Novices were those Catechumeni who as yet were not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Tim. 3.6 or very lately were baptised so called from the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Enlish New-plants that is to say New-beginners and Punies of the Church Other Catechumeni there were little impes borne in the Church 2 Young children of Christian parents the children of Christians These eft soones after their birth as being members of the Church were baptised and after they were growne a little elder they were instructed in the Catechisme which when they had learned they were confirmed by laying on of hands and so dismissed out of the companie of the Catechumeni so that it was lawfull for them thence forward to draw neer with the elder sort unto the Lords Supper Of the Catechumeni you may see more in Eusebius tenth book of Ecclesiasticall history Euseb hist Ecclesiast lib. 10. cap. 4. Catechists and fourth chapter not far from the end They also were called Catechists who taught the Catechisme and were the instructers of the Catechumeni 2. Of the Originall of Catechisme and of the perpetuall use thereof in the Church AS of the whole ministery of the mysteries of Christianity so must we conceive of the originall of Catechisme The practice of catechising exereised in the time of both the Old and New Testament Gen. 17.7 that it was ordained of God and hath been of perpetuall continuance in the Church For whereas God since the beginning hath been the God not onely of the aged but of younglings also according to the forme of his Covenant made with Abraham I will be thy God and the God of thy seed he hath instituted and appointed that both of them after the exten◠and reach of their capacity be severally instructed in the doctrine of salvation First the elder by the publike voice of the Ministery then the younger by catechising at home and in schooles Concerning the instruction of the elder sort the case is cleere and out of doubt Touching the catechising of children in the Jewish Church In the time of the Old Testament there are expresse commands every where extant in holy Scripture In the 12. and 13. of Exodus God commandeth that children and the whole family should be taught the originall and use of the Passover In the fourth of Deuteronomie God chargeth Parents that they rehearse
whereby wee are out of Gods word informed and instructed unto faith or assent and beleefe as when wee use to say The Christian faith the Apostolike faith Oftentimes it is used for the fulfilling of ancient promises or the things themselves which are beleeved as Before faith came we were kept under the law and shut up unto the faith which should afterward be revealed Gal. 3.23 How faith differeth from all other kindes of knowledge Furthermore albeit there be also other certain notices whereunto we firmly give assent as understanding or apprehension of principles science sapience art prudence for the assent coming unto the notice doth confirme and perfect it so that what knowledge of a thing it had without assent it is imperfect and unprofitable yet none of those are that faith especially the Theologicall such as a little before is described for to those notices or apprehensions we do assent either because they are naturally engraffed in our minds or for that they bring demonstrance or some other true and certain proofs But the Theologicall assent or faith is not neither ariseth it out of the instinct of nature neither out of sense or experience neither out of demonstrations or reasons borrowed from Philosophy but cometh and dependeth of a peculiar and supernaturall revelation or divine testimony That therefore which is added in the former description for the asseveration of God himselfe distinguisheth Theologicall faith from all other knowledges even the most certain And this generall definition of Theologicall faith is necessary that wee may not think that out of Philosophy or such principles as are naturally known to all are to be drawn reasons or arguments sound and sufficient to confirme the articles of our faith but may know that the word of God and those good and necessary consequences and arguments which are framed out of it are a supernaturall light and more certain then all though most exact and exquisite demonstrances either Naturall or Mathematicall of Philosophers 2. How many kinds of faith there are in Scripture FOur sorts of faith are found rehearsed in Scripture 1. Historicall 2. Temporary 3. Working miracles 4. Justifying or saving faith The difference of these kinds one from the other appeareth out of their definitions Historicall faith is to know and think all those things to be true which are manifested from above What historicall faith is either by voice or by visions or by oracles or by any other manner of revelation and are taught in the books of the Prophets and Apostles and thus to be perswaded of them for the asseveration and testimony of God himselfe It is called historicall because it is a bare knowledge of such things as God is said to have done to do or that he will do hereafter of this faith these testimonies of holy Scripture make mention 1 Cor. 13.2 If I have all faith so that I could remove mountains c. Which saying notwithstanding may be construed of all the sorts of faith James 2.19 justifying faith only excepted The divels beleeve and tremble for the divell knoweth exactly both what things are written in the word and also what are not written because hee is a spirit witty quick and learned hee is present and seeth whatsoever things are done in the Church and also through long experience hath known the doctrine of the Church to be true Acts 8.13 Simon Magus beleeved to wit that the doctrine was true which the Apostle Peter propounded but he had not a justifying faith Temporary faith is to assent unto the doctrine of the Church together with profession and joy therein What temporall faith is though not true and unfained that is to say not springing from a lively sense of the grace of God towards them but of some other cause whatsoever therefore it endureth but for a time and in the instant of affliction vanisheth Or It is to assent unto the heavenly doctrine which is delivered by the Prophets and Apostles to professe it to glory therein and to rejoyce in the knowledge thereof for a time not for the application of the promise to themselves to wit not for any feeling in their hearts of Gods grace towards them but for other causes and therefore without any true conversion and finall perseverance in the profession of this doctrine This definition is drawn from the parable and words of Christ He that receiveth seed in the stony ground is he which heareth the word and incontinently with joy receiveth it yet hath hee not root in himselfe and dureth but a season Mat. 13.20 21. for as soon as tribulation or persecution cometh c. The causes of this kind of joy are in a manner infinite and diverse in divers persons yet all of them temporary at whose fading such faith also as is grounded on them flitteth and vanisheth Hypocrites rejoyce at the hearing of the Gospel Temporary faith is led in a string with the commodities of the world and with them doth live and die either because it is a new doctrine in their ears or because it seemeth to sooth and flatter their affections whilest it disburdeneth them of mens traditions as doth the doctrine of Christian liberty of justification c. or because they haunt a licentious custome of sinning or hunt after profits and commodities whether publike or private as riches honour glory c. which then appeareth when the crosse overtaketh them For then because they have no root they are parched and wasted with the heat thereof Thus hypocrites rejoyce they rejoyce not as true beleevers I mean on a sense and feeling of Gods grace working in them and on an application unto themselves of the blessings offered in the word which one thing only in the faithfull is the cause that they are rapt with exceeding true and perfect joy and the removing of this cause sufficeth to make faith temporary The difference of temporall and historicall faith This time serving faith differeth from historicall only in that joy which accompanieth it and not the other for the historicall faith hath a bare and naked knowledge only but temporary faith besides this knowledge rejoyceth therein for time-serving men receive the word with joy whereas divels beleeve historically and yet are hereon touched with no joy but rather tremble they I say joy not in that knowledge they have but wish it were quite extinguished Nay farther they professe not themselves to be followers of that doctrine though they know it to be true but horribly persecute and maliciously oppugne the same Notwithstanding in men historicall faith is sometimes coupled with profession and sometimes also severed from it for oftentimes men professe for I know not what causes that religion and truth which in heart they hate many also which are resolved and know assuredly the verity of Christian doctrine notwithstanding oppose themselves and set their faces against it and these are they which sin against the holy Ghost Object Yea but the
Trinity and yet all three persons have their joynt-working in them neither did the Father and the holy Ghost redeem mankind neither do the Father and the Son sanctifie the faithfull Ans It is a fallacie grounding upon that which is affirmed but in respect as if it were simply affirmed For the Creation is given to the Father Redemption to the Son Sanctification to the holy Ghost not as they are simply an operation or work for so should the other two persons be excluded from it but in respect of the order and manner of working which is peculiar and proper to every of them in producing and bringing forth the same externall work A more open declaration hereof may be this The works of our creation redemption and sanctification are the operations of the Godhead outwardly that is externall operations which God worketh on his creatures and they are undivided that is common to the three persons which they by common will and power work in the creatures by reason of that one and the same essence and nature of the Godhead which they have For the Scripture attributeth the Creation not onely to the Father but to the Sonne also and the holy Ghost All things were made by it John 1.3 Genes 1.2 Matth. 1.20 Psal 33.6 The Spirit of the Lord moved upon the waters That which is conceived in her is of the holy Ghost By the Word of the Lord were the heavens made and all the hosts of them by the breath of his mouth Likewise our Redemption is attributed to the Father and the holy Ghost John 3.17 Titus 3.5 6. God sent his Sonne into the world that the world might be saved by him Hee saved us by the renewing of the holy Ghost which hee shed on us abundantly And Sanctification both to the Father and to the Son God hath sent the Spirit of his Sonne into our hearts crying Gal. 4.6 1 Thess 5.23 1 Cor. 1.30 Ephes 5.26 Abba Father The very God of peace sanctifie you throughout Christ is made sanctification unto us Christ sanctifieth the Church All the persons therefore create redeem and sanctifie Why distinct operations or workings are attributed to the three persons Neverthelesse yet in respect of that order of working which is between them Creation is ascribed unto the Father not excluding the other persons but because hee is the fountain as of the Divinity of the Son and the holy Ghost so also of those divine operations which hee worketh and performeth by the Sonne and the holy Ghost Redemption is ascribed unto the Sonne not excluding the other two persons but because he is that person which executeth the Fathers will concerning the redeeming of mankind and doth immediatly perform the work of our redemption for the Son only was sent into the flesh and hath paid the ransome or price for our sins not the Father nor the Spirit To the holy Ghost is ascribed Sanctification not excluding the other two persons from this action but because it doth immediatly sanctifie us Object 2. The externall workes of the Godhead that is such as the whole three persons exercise not mutually one towards another but execute in the creatures are indivisible or cannot be divided that is they are not appropriated unto any one of the three persons without respect unto the other But Creation Redemption and Sanctification are externall workes of the Godhead Therefore they are indivisible and by force of good consequent there needeth no such distinction of them as is proposed Answer to the Major The works of the Trinitie are indivisible but with retaining to each person his proper and peculiar manner of working All three persons therefore work on the creatures but yet that order still is inviolably kept as that the Father still is the fountaine of the operations of the Sonne and the holy Ghost and doth all things not of any other but of himselfe by the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Sonne doth all things of the Father by the holy Ghost the holy Ghost doth all things of the Father and the Sonne by himselfe For The Father createth but mediately by the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Sonne from the Father and the holy Ghost from the Father and the Sonne The Father and the holy Ghost redeeme us but mediately by the Sonne but the Sonne immediately from the Father by the holy Ghost The Father and the Sonne sanctifie us but mediately by the holy Ghost but the holy Ghost immediately from the Father and the Sonne But as concerning the works of the Trinitie which are called outward and inward works it shall be more fully enlarged when wee come to handle the last Question save one of the doctrine touching GOD. a Deut. 6.4 Isa 44.6 45.5 1 Cor. 8.4 6. Ephes 4.6 Quest 25. Seeing there is but one only substance of God why namest thou these three the Father the Son and the holy Ghost Answ Because God hath so manifested himself in his word b Gen. 1.2 3. Psalm 33.6 Isa 6.1 3. 48.16 61.1 Mat. 3.16 17. 28.19 John 12.40 14.26 15.26 2 Cor. 13.13 Gal. 4.6 Ephes 2.18 Tit. 3.5 6. 1 John 5.7 that these three distinct persons are that one true and everlasting God The Explication IN this Question is contained the doctrine of the Church concerning one God Questions concerning God and the three persons of the Godhead The principall questions therein are 1. Whence it may appeare that there is a God 2. What hee is or what manner of God the God of the Church is whom wee worship and in what hee differeth from idols 3. Whether he be One only and in what sense there are said to be many gods 4. What the name of Essence Person and Trinity signifie and how they differ 5. Whether these names are to be used in the Church and whether they are had in the Scripture 6. How many persons there be of the God-head 7. How they differ and are to be distinguished one from another 8. For what cause it is necessary that the Doctrine of the Trinity bee held in the Church 1. Whether there be a God and whence it appeareth THe great misery of mans nature cannot be sufficiently thought upon that whereas it was created to the bright knowledge and even the very image of God it is fallen so far as not only it is ignorant who and what God is but also maketh disputation Three causes which have made men to doubt whether there be a God whether there be any God in heaven or no. The causes of this evill the Church alone doth understand the first whereof is The blindnesse and corruption of mans nature after his fall the next The instigation of the divell who would have the whole opinion of God razed out of the minds of men unto which cometh the horrible confusion of mans life and humane affairs in that oftentimes the wicked flourish and the godly either are oppressed by them
Person no separate thing from the essence That the persons are not any thing separated from the essence which is common unto them nor the essence is any fourth thing separate from the three persons but each of them are the very selfe same whole essence of the Divinity But the difference is this that the persons are each distinct from the other but the essence is common to them three And that the person is no other thing subsisting or other substance then the essence may be understood in some sort by the example of a man One and the same man or one and the same substance is a father and a man or a son and a man and yet the manhood or to be a man is one thing the fatherhood or to be a father another but there is not one subsistent which is the father and another subsistent which is a man but one and the same subsistent is both because both manhood and fatherhood is in him manhood absolutely fatherhood respectively as in regard of his son What reference essence hath unto person Of the word Essence also it is further to be noted that God or the Deity or divine essence is not in respect of the persons the same which the matter in respect of the effect because God is unchangeable neither is compounded of matter and form Therefore we cannot say well Three persons are or consist of one essence Neither is it as the whole in respect of the parts because God is indivisible Wherefore it is not well said that the person is a part of the essence or the essence consisteth of three persons for every person is the whole divine essence one and the same Neither is it as the generall to the speciall because essence is not the generall to the three persons nor person a speciall to essence But God is a more common name because the essence of the Deity is common to the three persons and therefore may be affirmed of each of them But these names Father Son and holy Ghost are more strict because the persons are indeed distinct and cannot be affirmed the one of the other Therefore it is well said God or the divine Essence is the Father is the Son is the holy Ghost Likewise The three persons are one God or in one God Again They are one and the same essence nature divinity wisdome c. They are of one and the same essence nature divinity c. Yet it cannot be well said They are of one God because there is no one of these persons but is whole and perfect God Wherefore the divine essence is in respect of the persons as a thing after a rare and singular manner communicated in respect of those things unto which it is common For neither is there the like example of community in any created things For a generall is a certain thing common to many specials and a generall and speciall to many individuals but yet so that they are affirmed of those many plurally not singularly as that the father and the son or this father and son are two living creatures two men But we may not speak after this sort of God and the divine persons as to say The Father and the Son are two Gods two Spirits two Omnipotents c. Because there is but one God one Spirit one Omnipotent c. Wherefore that affirmation The Father is God the Son is God the holy Ghost is God is a true affirmation affirming that which is more common of a thing which is more restrict that is affirming the essence of the individuall which hath in some sort an analogy and proportion only with the speciall affirmed of his individuall but it is not at all the same nor of the same kind What the Trinity is By the name of Trinity are understood the three Persons distinct in one essence of the Deity by three manners of being or subsisting Now Trinity and Triplicity as also Trinall and Triple differ That is said to be Triple which is comprehended of three essences or is distinct by three essences Trinall is that which in essence is but one and most simple but hath three manners of being of subsisting God therefore is not triple because there are not more essences but Trinall because he being one according to his essence is three according to his persons 5. Whether these names are to be used in the Church HEreticks of ancient carped at these termes because they occurre not in Scripture But wee imitate aright the manner of speech which was usuall in the ancient and purer Church and by their authority and example retain these names 1. Because though they are not found extant in so many syllables yet phrases and speeches of neer affinity and likelihood yea and sometimes words and terms of the same signification which these are are read in Scripture For instance that of the Lords own mouth I am that I am Again I am hath sent mee unto you Again Exod. 3. â—â— it cannot be denied but that the word Jehovah answereth to that wee call essence So the word Hypostasis is used to signifie a Person in the Epistle to the Hebrewes Who being the engraved form of his person Heb. 1.2 Neither doth the Church in any other sense call the persons the Trinity then as John saith that There are three which bear record in heaven the Father the Word and the holy Ghost 2. Because the course of interpretation requireth that the words of Scripture be expounded to the learned by such words as being more usuall in other languages or matters and doctrines are more easie for them to understand and paveth and maketh plain a way unto them for the understanding of the speech and phrase of Scripture Otherwise if no words were to be used but such as are extant in the Scriptures all interpretation should be taken away It is lawfull therefore that the Church invent and use words and phrases of speech whereby they may significantly expresse the sense of Scripture and their owne meaning 3. Because the sleights and sophisms of Hereticks which for the most part they go about to cloak and cover with the words of the holy Scripture are more easily espyed and taken heed of if the same things be expounded in divers words and those especially short perspicuous and significant For it cometh to passe that by reason of the pithinesse and plainnesse of these terms Hereticks are dismantled and can no longer shroud their sinister constructions and apparent corruptions Neverthelesse if there were a consent and agreement on the things wee should easily come to an agreement about the words for we detest contention brawling about words Neither is the Church at controversie with other Gentiles and Hereticks about bare terms but of this main substantiall doctrine That the eternall Father and the Son and the holy Ghost are one God and yet neither is the Father the Son or the holy Ghost nor the holy Ghost the
Father or the Son c. Now were it not that Hereticks cannot away with this doctrine they would easily admit of the phrases of speech But they therefore abandon the terms because they abhor the things and doctrine intimated and signified by them Hence we easily answer this their objection Obj. Words not extant in Scripture are not to be used in the Church But these names namely Essence Person and Trinity occurre not in Scripture therefore they may not be used in the Church Ans We expound the Major thus That which is not in Scripture neither concerning the bare words nor concerning the sense is be omitted But the names themselves of Essence Person and Trinity as concerning the things lively insinuated by them are extant in Scripture as hath been proved Again Terms not extant in Scripture are to be omitted if by sparing them the substance of the things themselves be not endangered But the drift and purpose of hereticks is no other but with the terms to abolish or at least deprave the doctrine of the Church Therefore they are to be retained to prevent their attempts Repl. But they breed contentions Answ This happeneth by accident by reason of contentious hereticks 6. How many persons there be of the Divinity or God-head Three persons are one God and one God is three persons IN one divine Essence are subsisting three Persons and those truly distinct one from another by their properties namely the Father the Son and the holy Ghost each of which three persons notwithstanding are one and the same God eternall infinite and most perfect in himselfe And these persons are consubstantiall co-eternall without any confounding of their properties and respects as also without any disparagement or inequality between them And That there are three persons each of which are that one true God Creatour of all things is proved 1. By testimonies of Scripture which are taken partly out of the old Testament and partly out of the new The old Testament yeeldeth us many testimonies Gen. 1.2 3. Exod. 3.2 The Spirit of the Lord moved upon the waters Then God said Let there be light The Lord is said to have appeared unto Moses in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush Acts 7.30 Steven calleth him The Angel of the Lord which is Christ the Son of God even that Angel of the great counsell The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me Isa 61.1 therefore hath he anointed me he hath sent mee to preach good tidings unto the poor to binde up the broken hearted Here the Spirit is discerned both from him that anointeth and from him that is anointed Hee is discerned also by his gifts because hee saith Upon mee that is dwelling in me sanctifying mee Therefore these be three diverse persons subsisting But yet there are both moe and more cleer testimonies in the new Testament Mat. 28.19 Teach all nations baptising them in the Name of the Father and the Son and the holy Ghost The Comforter which is the holy Ghost John 14.26 John 15.27 whom the Father will send in my name When the Comforter shall come whom I will send unto you from the Father even the Spirit of truth which proceedeth of the Father The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ 2 Cor. 13.13 and the love of God and the communion of the holy Ghost be with you all In this saying of the Apostle invocation is joyned with an application and distinction of the three persons By grace he meaneth the benefits of Christ by love the acceptation whereby God for his Sons sake doth receive us into favour by the communion of the holy Ghost his gifts which are common unto the godly There are three in heaven which beare record God saved us by the washing of the new birth 1 John 5.7 Tâ—t 3.5 6. and by the renewing of the holy Ghost which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour Here he maketh three authours of our salvation Ephes 2.18 Gal. 4.6 Through him wee have an entrance unto the Father by one Spirit God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into our hearts Therefore it is one Spirit which the Father and the Son sendeth 2. The same is proved by those places of Scripture which give unto these three the Father the Son and the holy Ghost the name of Jehovah and the true God In like manner those places wherein those things which are spoken of Jehovah in the old Testament are in the new referred expresly and most plainly to the Son and the holy Ghost 3. Those places which attribute the same whole divine essence to the three and shew that the Son is the proper Son of the Father most truly begotten of him and the holy Ghost is the Spirit of the Father and the Son and that so proper and peculiar as that he is and proceedeth of God which is the Father and the Son The Son therefore and holy Ghost have the same and that whole essence of the Deity which the Father hath the Son hath it communicated of the Father by being born of him and the holy Ghost of the Father and the Son by proceeding from them 4. Those places which give unto the three the same attributes or properties and perfections of the divine nature namely eternity immensity omnipotency c. 5. Those places which attribute to the three the same effects or works proper unto the Deity namely creation preservation and government of the world as also miracles and the salvation of the Church 6. Those places which yeeld to the three equall honour and worship and such as agreeth to the true God alone By this consent therefore of the old and new Testament it is confirmed that one God is three persons truly distinct and those three persons are one God By this also we understand that it is truely said that the Father is other from the Son and the holy Ghost and the holy Ghost other from both but not truly that the Father is another thing from the Son and the Son another thing and the holy Ghost another thing for to be another thing betokeneth a diversity of essence to be other a diverse manner of existing or a distinction of persons Now the three distinct persons have not a diverse Deity but one and the same in number It followeth that we should demonstrate of each severall person of the Deity that they are true Subsistents against Samosatenus and Servetus that they are distinct against Arrius Eunomius and Macedonius lastly that they are of the same and not of only like essence against the same hereticks But of the person of the Father there is no controversie and these scruples and doubts touching the persons of the Son and holy Ghost shall more conveniently hereafter in their proper place be cleared 7. How the three persons of the God-head are distinguished HEre we are first to observe and consider Attributes common to
it by an order changeable some by an unchangeable order and therefore in respect of some it is contingent and in respect of some necessary For as the originals or causes of contingency in things are that liberty which is in the will of God and Angels and Men and the mutable nature of the matter of the elements together with the readinesse or inclination thereof to divers motions and formes so the cause of absolute necessity in God is the very unchangeable nature of God but the cause of that necessity which is only by consequent is the divine providence or decree coming between those things which are in their owne nature mutable and also the nature of things created which is framed and ordained of God to certaine effects and yet subject to the most free will and government of God either according or besides or contrary to this order which himselfe hath made In respect therefore of second causes some things are necessary which are done by causes alwaies working after one sort as the motion of the Sun the burning of any matter put into the fire if it be capable of burning some things are contingent which have causes working contingently that is apt and fit to produce or to forbeare producing divers and contrary effects as the blasts of windes the locall motions of living creatures the actions of mens wils But in respect of the first cause that is of the will of God all things which are or are done in Gods externall or outward workes are partly necessary partly contingent Necessary as even those things which have second causes most changeable as that the bones of Christ on the Crosse were not broken by the Souldiers by reason of the unchangeablenesse or the decree and providence of God Contingent by reason of the liberty of his eternall and unchangeable decree and the execution thereof even those things which as concerning their own nature have second causes most unchangeable as the motion of the Sun and shadowes If therefore by contingency they meane the changeablenesse of effects What contingency is denied which they have by the natures of second causes or by the power and liberty of God it doth not follow that things are contingent because of that necessity which they have by the providence of God For this doth not take away but preserveth rather the nature order and manner of working in second causes ordained by God But if by contingency they meane the changeablenesse of second causes and effects so floating and wavering that they are not ruled and governed by Gods providence any such contingency the Scripture doth not admit or approve Whether the motions of a creature are contingent or necessary Hereby we also understand When it is demanded concerning the motions and effects of creatures whether they are to be termed necessary or contingent that some verily are more rightly and properly called contingent than necessary though both contingent and necessary are wrought by divine providence For they are rather to be called such as they are of their own nature and by the nature of their neerest causes than as they are in respect of Gods providence which is a cause more removed and farther off And nothing is more either certain or manifest than that according to the nature of second causes some things should be changeable some unchangeable yet by the power of God though all things in the creatures may be changed they are made notwithstanding unchangeable because of the certainty of his decree and divine providence So likewise we answer concerning fortune and chance What fortune and chance is denied For if by these names be understood such causes or events by accident as have no cause which is proper and by it selfe a cause they ought to be far abandoned from the Church of Christ But if wee understand thereby a cause which is by it selfe a cause and proper though unknowne to our senses and reason or such causes by accident which have notwithstanding some secret proper cause adjoyned nothing hindereth in respect of second causes which are causes by accident and in respect of our judgment whereby we attain not to the proper and that which is by it selfe the cause of these events that to be or to be a thing fortuning or done by chance which in respect of Gods providence cometh to passe by his most accurate and unchangeable counsell and decree according to those sayings Mat. 10.29 Pro. 16.33 One Sparrow shall not fall on the ground without your Father And The lot is cast into the lap c. The fifth Sophisme of the inutility or unprofitablenesse of means God is effectuall in working by means which himself hath freely ordained THat which shall be unchangeably and necessarily by the will and providence of God in vain to the furthering or hindering of that are means applyed as the use of the ministery the magistrates lawes exhortations promises threatnings punishments prayer our study and endeavours But all things are done by the decree of God unchangeably neither can they which work by the providence of God work otherwise then they doe Therefore all those means are vain and fruitlesse Answ It is not necessary that the first and principall cause being put the second and instrumentall cause should be removed and taken away In vain are second causes and means applyed if God had determined to execute his decrees without means neither had commanded us to use them But seeing God hath decreed by those means in some to work faith and conversion some to bridle and keep under means and some to leave excuselesse and hath for that cause commanded us to use them they are not in vain used and applyed yea when there cometh no profit by these yet they profit to this that they leave the wicked without excuse As therefore the Sun doth not in vain daily rise and set neither are the fields in vain sowed and watered with the rain neither bodies in vain with food refreshed though God createth light and darknesse bringeth forth the corn out of the earth and is the life and length of our dayes so neither are men in vain taught or do study to conform their life unto doctrine though all available actions and events proceed only from God for God from everlasting decreed as the ends so the means also and prescribed them unto us whereby it seemed good to him to bring us unto them Wherefore we using those means doe well Three causes why we must use means and obtain profitable and fruitfull events but if wee neglect them either by our fault we deprive our selves or others of those blessings offered by God or if God even in this contempt of his word have mercy on us or others yet our conscience accuseth us of open and grievous sin Wherefore we must use means 1. That wee may obey God therein who both hath decreed ends and ordained means to those ends and prescribed them unto us neither tempt
Deity either of nature that is by divine properties created which are not equall with the Creatour so are the Angels or of office so Moses is called called god and all Magistrates Luke 1.32 But unto the Son Christ it is communicated by the nature or essence it self so that the very Deity is his substance Which we thus prove 1. He is the onely begotten and proper Son of God the Son of the most High who also is himself the most High But he is the proper Son to whom the substance of the Father is communicated As the Father hath life in himself John 5.26 so likewise hath he given to the Son to have life in himself Therefore the Son also is God of himself living and the fountain of life Wherefore this communicating of the Deity maketh him equall with God and the same God with the Father So far off is it from proving the contrary Repl. 1. Power was given to him John 5.27 being man Therefore it was not given him by eternall generation Ans It was given to the Word by generation to man by union of the Word Repl. 2. It was given him after his resurrection Ans Then was given him the full authority and liberty of using that power which he had alwaies All things mad by the Word All things were made by it and without it was made nothing Wee interpret That all creatures were made by him in the beginning and that also by him is gathered out of mankind and regenerated through the working of the holy Ghost an everlasting Church They construe it That by all things are meant those things which are wrought in the new creation that is in the collection and regeneration of the Church by the Gospel which is called the second creation Answ 1. Wee grant this point not the whole interpretation but only this point of the creation and if this were the sense yet hereof would it also follow That Christ were very God and by nature God The second creation also which is regeneration proveth Christ God 1 Cor. 3.6 9. Heb. 3.4 6. Eph. 1.33 4.8 10. 1. Because to work the first and second creation by his owne nature power and operation is the proper worke of one and the same very God God gave the increase So then is neither he that planteth any thing neither hee that watereth but God that giveth the increase Yee are Gods husbandry and Gods building Hee that hath built all things is God And Christ worketh this new creation not as an instrument but by his own proper vertue Which is his body even the fulnesse of him that filleth all in all things Hee ascended up on high hee gave gifts unto men hee ascended farre above all heavens that hee might fill all things Hee gave some Apostles and some Prophets By whom all the body receiveth increase I give unto them eternall life Hee sanctifieth the Church John 10 2â— Eph. 5 2â— and cleanseth it by the washing of water through the word 2. Because no man can give the holy Ghost but hee that is very God whose proper spirit it is But the second creation is not wrought but by the holy Ghost whom Christ the worker and effector of this creation sendeth Therefore hee is very God and Lord. 3. Because the new creation is the regeneration of the elect to eternall life This began even from Adam albeit it was wrought in regard of the Mediatour which was to come And it was wrought by the same Mediatour the Sonne in regard of whom or for whose sake it was wrought ever since the beginning For Christ as by his merit so by his efficacy and vertue is Saviour not onely of a part but also of his whole Church and body which consisteth of all the elect and sanctified even from Adams time By whom all the body receiveth increase Eph. 4 1â— Esay 9. â— The everlasting Father authour preserver propagator and amplifier of his Church through all ages of the world The Ruler that should come forth out of Bethlehem Mieah 3.2 was given from everlasting to he the Head and Saviour of the Church Hee shall be peace even before hee came out of Bethlehem and the Saviour of his Church against the Assyrians and all her enemies Gen. 3.83 The seed of the woman shall breake the Serpents head This victory and conquest over the Divell beganne even from the beginning of the world David acknowledgeth the Messias also to be his Lord a Priest and a King not only that was to come in the flesh Psal 110. â— but even now present to whom now long before God had said Thou art a Priest that is whom hee had already ordained to this office living working and preserving the elect There is one God and 〈◊〉 Mediatour between God and man 1 Tim. 2.5 which is the man Christ Jesus Therefore this man is the Mediatour of all from the very beginning hee is the Mediatour obtaining and giving the blessings which hee hath obtained unto all I give unto â—hâ—m eternall life John 10.38 Ephes 1.22 1 Pet. 1.11 3 Hee hath appointed him over all things to be the head to the Church The Spirit of Christ in the Prophets By the Spirit hee went and preached unto the spirits that now are in Prison Eph. â— 2â— which were in time passed disobedient Yee are built upon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets Jesus Christ himselfe being the chiefe corâ—eâ—-stone Which place is diligently to be observed For then either Christ is the head foundation sanctifier and Saviour of a part of the Church onely which is most absurd or hee was this from the beginning of the world Hee is made the builder of the house whereof Moses also was a part Heb. 3.3 13. â—â— Jesus Christ yesterday and to day and the same for ever Ans 2. Wee deny their interpretaion For S. John there speaketh of the first creation Which wee shew 1. Because he speaketh of the second afterwards As many as received him to them he gave power to be the sonneâ— of God Of his fulnesse have wee all received Grace and truth â—ame by Jesus Christ Now hee therefore setteth downe the first creation before because both creations are the work of the same That therefore he might shew that the second creation was wrought by the Word it was necessary for him to teach that the first also was wrought by it For the same is the Creatour and Repairer of the world 2. Because he saith the world was made by him Repl. The world here is taken for the Church Ans No For he addeth And the world knew him not The same world which was made by him knew him not Therefore he meaneth the wicked whether elect or reprobate 3. Other places demonstrate the same My Father worketh hitherto John 5.17 and I worke Wherefore both of them from the beginning of the world Ibid. v. 19.20 worke the
truly say that hee also sitteth at the right hand of the Father Ans It doth not follow because the reason is grounded on an ill definition For although the holy Ghost be as well as the Father and the Son Head and Lord and Ruler of the Church yet doth it not agree to the holy Ghost but to Christ alone to sit at the right hand of the Father because hee alone took humane nature was humbled dead buried rose againe ascended and is Mediatour And further the Father worketh immediatly by the Son only but by the holy Ghost the Father doth not work immediatly but through the Son For the same order is to be kept in their operation and working which is in the persons The Father worketh not By himselfe but Of himself because he is of none The Son worketh By himself not Of himself because he is begotten of the Father The holy Ghost worketh by himself but from the Father and the Son from whom he doth proceed Therefore the Father worketh immediatly by the Son because the Son is before the holy Ghost yet not in time but in order but mediatly the Father worketh by the holy Ghost and therefore the Son the Mediatour is rightly said to sit at the right hand of the Father but not the holy Ghost Obj. 2. Christ before his ascension was alwaies the glorious Head and King of the Church Therefore he cannot now be first after his ascension said to sit at Gods right hand Ans Again this reason also is grounded upon a bad definition Christ was alwaies glorious but hee was not alwaies advanced and exalted in the office of the Mediatourship to wit in his Kingdome and Priesthood Now first he began to have the consummation and perfection of glory which before he had not that is gloriously to rule and administer his Kingdome and Priest-hood in the heavens Obj. 3. Christ saith To him that overcometh will I grant to sit in my throne with me Therefore we also shall sit at the right hand of the Father Ans We shall sit there by participation of glory where this must be also granted that the same is the throne of the Father and the Son In the same throne many may sit but not in the same dignity but some in higher room and some in lower Many Counsellers sit neer the Prince but the Lord Chancellour only sitteth at his right hand And so Christ will not give that chief dignity and glory given him of his Father unto any other Repl. But to sit at Gods right hand is also to live gloriously and blessedly and this agreeth to us Ans This is not a full and sufficient dâ—finition because a blessed life agreeth both to us and Angels but the sitting at Gods right hand doth not Whereupon these Articles were adjoyned together He ascended into heaven Hee sitteth at the right hand of God the Father 3. Whether Christ did alwaies sit at the right hand of God THis Question should not be needfull except mens curiosity had made it such To the explication whereof is required the distinction first of natures then of time Now as concerning Christs divinity 1. That alwaies sitteth at the right hand of the Father How Christ alwaies sate at the right hand of the Father according to his divinity as sitting signifieth an equall power and honour which Christ hath even the same with the Father For Christs divine nature was from everlasting equall with the Father in honour and power Likewise as To sit at the right hand of the Father signifieth To be the head of the Church For by the Word the Father did from the beginning alwaies preserve the Church as also by him he created all things In this sense Christ was placed by his eternall generation at the right hand of the Father 2. Christ according to his Divinity also doth so sit at the right hand of the Father as hee was ordained to this his office of Mediatourship from everlasting For hee was from everlasting ordained to the Mediatourship yea even according to his divinity 3. He doth alwaies sit according to his divinity at the right hand of God in that he begun from the very beginning of the world to execute and hath executed this his office How he sate not alwaies according to it but was there placed And Christ according to his divinity was in this respect after his ascension into heaven placed at the right hand in that his divinity then began to shew it selfe glorious in his body which in the time of his humiliation had hid it selfe from being openly manifested and declared For in the time of his humiliation which was when he lived on earth his God-head also had humbled it selfe not by making it selfe weaker but by hiding it self onely and not shewing it selfe abroad Therefore thus Christ also according to his divine nature was placed at his Fathers right hand namely by laying downe that humility which he took on him for our sake and by shewing forth that glory which hee had with his Father before the foundations of the world were laid but had hid the same in the time of his humiliation not by adding any thing unto it which it had not before neither by making it more bright and powerfull neither by manifesting and declaring it before God but unto men and by using fully and freely his right and authority which right and authority Christs humanity had as it were laid downe in the taking up and assumption of humane nature John 17.5 Therefore hee saith Now glorifie mee thou Father with thine owne selfe with the glory which I had with thee before the world was This glory he had not with men Therefore he prayeth that as he had it alwaies with the Father so he might manifest it unto men Wherefore this is not to be taken as if the Word received any change or alteration of his God-head but in that sense only which hath been said Now as concerning Christs humane nature according to it he was then first placed at the right hand of the Father when he ascended into heaven then he attained to his glorification when he received that which before he had not Luke 24.26 For thus it behooved Christ to suffer and so to enter into his glory The Ubiquitaries arguments drawn from Christs sitting at his Fathers right hand Object 1. Hee that sitteth at Gods right hand is every-where Christ sitteth at Gods right hand Therefore hee is every-where Ans This reason wee grant in respect of the communicating of the properties to the person But if it be further concluded that according to the flesh he is is every-where there will be more in the conclusion than was in the premisses Object 2. The right hand of God is every-where Christs humane nature sitteth at the right hand of God Therefore his humane nature is every-where Ans We deny the consequence of the whole reason because there are foure termes in this Syllogisme For
the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you And we are to hold and keep these notes and marks 1. In respect of Gods glory that enemies may be discerned from sons 2. In respect of our own salvation that we may joyn our selves to the true Church Object 1. There were in all ages great errours both publike and private in the Church Against the first marke Ans 1. But still the foundation was held on which some built gold some stubble 2. Errours are not defended by the Church and this mark standeth sure if the foundation be held though on it stubble be built so that such errours and such stubble be not maintained Against the third marke Object 2. In many Churches which professe true doctrine this third mark is not seene Therefore they are no Churches Ans 1. There are many in them who indeed yeeld and indeavour to yeeld obedience 2. All obey acknowledging by their profession that sins ought not to be maintained But it is necessary that this third mark should be added because they should mock God Against all the foresaid markes Not all that challenge these marks are the Church because all have them not though they challenge them The ordinary succession of Bishops no necessary mark of the Church who would say that they received this Doctrine of Christ and would not frame their lives according unto it Object 3. But those which all Schismaticks and Hereticks doe challenge unto them are not the marks of the true Church But all of them doe challenge these unto them Therefore they are not marks of the true Church Ans I deny the Major For we are not to see whether they challenge them but whether they have them So also would it follow that the heavenly blessings which are proper to the true Church are theirs also because they challenge them Object 4. Without which the Church cannot be that is a mark thereof But without the ordinary succession of Bishops the Church cannot be Therefore it is a mark thereof Ans By ordinary succession in the ministery is meant the succession of Ministers in the same doctrine and administration of Sacraments And if the proposition be so understood it is true for such a succession is nothing else then those notes which we have put But in the conclusion of this objection is understood that there should be an ordinary succession into the same place whether they teach the same doctrine or a diverse from it And so also it should be a tying of the Church to a certaine City Region and so forth But in this sense the Minor and Conclusion are false 4. Why the Church is called one holy and Catholike One for consent in faith and doctrine THe Church is called one not in regard of the cohabitation or the neere dwelling of the members thereof or for their agreement in rites and ceremonies of their Religion but in respect of their consent in faith and doctrine It is also called Holy because it is sanctified of God by the bloud and spirit of Christ that it may be like unto him not in perfection but Holy 1. for imputed righteousness By imputation of righteousnesse because Christs holinesse and obedience is imputed unto it For inchoative righteousnesse By inchoation of righteousnesse because the holy Ghost doth renue it by little and little and cleanse it from the filth of sin that all the members may begin all the parts of obedience For the use to which it is consecrated Catholike in respect of place time and the members thereof Because it is consecrated to an holy and divine use and therefore sequestred from the rout of wicked ones who are without the Church It is called Catholike 1. In respect of place because it is spread through the whole world For there is one universall Church of all places and degrees of life neither is it tied to a certaine place and kingdome or to a certaine succession 2. In respect of time because there is but one true Church of all times which also is at all times so Catholike as that it is dispersed through the whole world neither is it at any time tied to any certaine place 3. In respect of the men who are members of the same For the Church is gathered out of all sorts of men all states kindreds and nations It is not Catholike because it possesseth many kingdomes For Catholike is a title given unto the Church in the Apostles time for before time the Church was limited within narrow bounds Now that there is but one Church of all times and ages One Church of all times and ages from the beginning of the world unto the end it is out of doubt For 1. It is manifest that the Church hath ever beene Neither can Abrahams daies be objected as if before he was called there had been no worship of the true God in his family and himselfe had beene after his calling alone without any others For before his calling he held the foundation and grounds of doctrine of the true God though it were darkned with superstitions mingled therewith Againe Melchisedech lived at the same time who was the Priest of the most high God and therefore neither was Abraham after his calling alone but there were others besides him worshippers of the true God whose Priest was Melchisedech 2. That the Church as it hath beene ever so shall it also continue ever appeareth by these testimonies My words shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out of the mouth of thy seed If the night and day may be changed Esay 59.21 then shall my Covenant also be changed I am with you alwayes unto the end of the world Jer. 33.20 Mat. 28.20 Moreover Christ was ever and ever shall be King Head and Priest of the Church Wherefore the Church was ever and ever shall be And hence also it is manifest That the Church of both Testaments is one and the same that which is confirmed also by the article following For Christ is the sanctifier of his Church who is common to men of both Testaments Hitherto appertaineth the question of the authority of the Church The Papists maintaine that the authority of the Church is greater then the authority of the Scripture But this is false For the Church made not the Scripture but the Scripture made the Church They urge S. Augustine his testimony S. Augustine against Manichaeus his Epistle cap. 5. sheweth how he was brought to the faith of the Catholike Church For he saith That he obeyed the Catholikes when they said Beleeve the Gospel and there he bringeth forth that common saying I would not beleeve the Gospel except the authority of the Catholike Church moved me thereunto By the testimony therefore of the Church he was moved to read the Gospel and to beleeve that heavenly doctrine was contained therein But doth he after he
Rom. 8.11 hee that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies Object 6. These all through faith are dead and received not the promise Heb. 11.39 Therefore they received not their Countrey Answ 1. Although they dying had not found their countrey yet would it not follow of these words that they are not at all or have no sense after death for he that is not or hath no sense seeketh not his countrey 2. The author of that Epistle doth not speak of the life after death which is led in the celestiall countrey 2 Cor. 5. but of this life in which the faithfull walking their pilgrimage sought for the celestiall countrey not finding their countrey on earth Object 7. They are flesh a wind that passeth away and cometh not again Answ By these and the like speeches the brevity of mans life and the frailty and perishing of all humane affaires without God is described and bewailed For as here they are compared to a wind eft-soons vanishing away so Psal 103. they are compared to dust grasse and flowers of the field Likewise Hee shooteth forth as a flower Job 14.2 and is cut downe and vanisheth as a shadow All flesh is grasse Isa 40.6 But if they urge the very word in these speeches it will follow that not only after death there is nothing remaining but that there is not any resurrection when hee saith a wind that passeth and cometh not again as flowers and shadowes whereunto man is compared doe so perish that they are not recovered Object 8. I am counted as the slain lying in the grave whom thou remembrest no more Ans In these words the Prophet doth not signifie either himselfe Psal 88.5 or the dead to be exempted from Gods providence but he complaineth that hee is forsaken of God even as the dead seem to men not to be cared for of him and therefore he speaketh not according to the sense of faith but of his own opinion and weaknesse and misery who judgeth those to be forsaken and neglected of God whose delivery for a while he doth deferre But what faith in the mean season suggesteth and telleth the godly even when they wrestle with temptation he sheweth when he saith The just shall be in everlasting memory Object 9. His spirit departeth Psal 112.6 and hee returneth to the earth then his thoughts perish Ans Here hee saith not Psal 146.4 the spirit or soul of man perisheth or vanisheth or dieth or it is bereaved of sense but that it departeth to wit from the body wherein it dwelleth and that not the spirit but the man returneth to his earth that is as concerning his body which was made of earth as it is written Genes 3. and Eccl. 12. And lastly hee saith that his thoughts perish which is not that the soul is after this life bereaved of reason judgement and sense of the mercy or wrath of God but that his purposes and counsels are made frustrate which man in this life had setled with himselfe to bring to passe Psal 112.10 in which sense it is said The desire of the wicked shall perish Object 10. They gather also other sayings which take away all praising and worshipping of God from the dead As Wilt thou shew a miracle unto the dead Or shall the dead rise and praise thee Psal 88.10 But in such speeches death and hell or the grave have two significations They who are spiritually dead whether afore or after the death of the body that is they who are deprived of Gods grace and forsaken and rejected of God and are in hell that is in the place and torments of the damned or else in this life despairing and destitute of comfort shall not praise God at all neither in this life nor in the life to come But they who are dead not spiritually but corporally only albeit they shall not praise God in this life while their bodies are in hell that is in the grave yet in the soul they shall not cease to acknowledge and praise God in the other life untill when receiving their bodies again they shall magnifie him in both in the celestiall eternity But in the mean season because God will also be agnised and magnified of men in this life therefore both the whole Church and every one of the faithfull not only pray that they may not fall into that forsaking and into that sense of Gods wrath wherewith the wicked are oppressed but also desire that they may be in this mortall life preserved and defended untill the end thereof by God appointed be expired For the Saints doe not simply stand in fear of the bodily death and grave but that they may not be forsaken of God neither fall into desperation and destruction or their enemies insult against God when they are overthrown this with daily and ardent prayers and petitions they beg and crave continually Now that which the adversaries adde further Psal 146.2 I will praise the Lord during my life as long as I have any being I will sing unto my God Answ This maketh nothing with them for hee restraineth not the praising of God to the time of his mortall life but only he saith that he will spend all that time in Gods praises which notwithstanding in many other places he extendeth to continue through all eternity as Psal 34. I will praise the Lord continually But oftentimes this particle untill or as long as signifieth a continuance of the time going before some event without any excluding of the time following as Hee must raign untill hee put all his enemies under his feet 1 Cor. 15.25 Object 11. Let him cease and leave off from mee that I may take a little comfort before I goe Job 10.20 and shall not return Answ Hee denyeth in these words that hee shall return into this mortall life and to converse among men in this world but he denyeth not that he in the mean season hath his being and doth live untill again hee see God in his flesh Chap. 17.26 even the same Job who then was afflicted Object Why dyed I not when I came out of the womb So should I have slept then and beene at rest Job 3.11 13. c. Answ Here also Job doth not deny the soules after death to be live feele and understand but onely he saith the miseries of this present life are not felt If they urge that neither the evils of the life to come are felt because then Job should wish for a bad change we answer that Job wisheth not for the death of the wicked but of the godly But if they adde further That Job doth make Kings and Princes also which gather gold unto them small and great that is all men good and bad partakers of this rest our answer is out of the processe and course of his whole speech that Job doth not teach here what is the state of men
Lib. 4. Dut. 11. c. Quidam The age and parentage of Consubstantiation This opinion Lombard relateth and testifieth that it was before his time maintained by some but he calleth it a Paradox a strange or wonderfull opinion Guitmund fathereth it on Berengarius after his recantation and termeth it Impanation Others impute it to one Walrame against whom Anselme hath two books extant Some fasten it on Rupert Abb. Tuit who lived not long after Guitmond about the year of the Lord 1124. Petrus de Alliaco Cardinall of Cambray saith In lib. 4. sentent q. 6. art 2. that he had rather defend Consubstantiation the Transubstantiation unlesse the Church of Rome had defined the contrary He lived about the year of our Lord 1416. Lib. de Ca. Babyl At length Luther approving the judgement of this Cardinal of Cambray as himself witnesseth first thought it no article of faith to beleeve that the substance of bread remaineth or remaineth not but either point might be held without heresie Afterwards it seemed more probable unto him that the bread should remaine and the body of Christ should be under in and with the bread And this is now their opinion who name themselves Lutherans Wherefore they interpret Christs words This is my body thus In this with this under this bread is my body and they glory and boast no lesse then the Papists that they retain the letter without any trope or figure And so have they ranked themselves that if they combate with Papists then the particle This noteth with them bread only and the bread it self is the body of Christ If they bend their forces against us whom they call Sacramentaries then the particle This shall not signifie bread only but bread with the body of Christ lodged invisibly therein and the sense shall be This is my body that is This bread and my body lying hid in this bread is my body They illustrate this their glosse with vulgar similies as they call them that Christ when he gave his invisible body in the bread in like manner said This is my body as the Country-man saith of the graine in his sacke This is corne pointing at the sack or the Merchant of the money in his purse This is money pointing at his purse or the Mother of the Infant in his cradle This is my child shewing the cradle only or the Vintner of his wine This is Rhenish wine when he reacheth out the Goblet These formes of speech are noted and observed out of their books and disputations But good men they have that luck which the Poet alotteth unto fooles Fooles when they seeke to avoid an inconvenience Horat. Serm. lib. 1. sat 3. fall into an evill For in place of that absurd miracle of the subsisting of accidents without any subject they have induced another more absurd of the penetration of two bodies and whether we respect the letter or the sense they have wandred departed farther from Christs words then the Papists For the letter thus lieth This that is This bread is my body The sense standeth thus The visible bread broken and distributed is my true and essentiall body given for you It is my true body not by any change of essence and nature as the Papists would have it for bread was not assumed by the Word for us neither was bread given and crucified for us but it is my true body in a mysticall sense and Sacramentall kind of speech according to the interpretation of the sounder antiquity of Paul yea and of Christ himselfe The Transsubstantials glosse is farte wide of this the letter and meaning of Christs words As then the Papists retaine not the letter when in stead of Christs words This is my body they annex this seraphicall or super-angelicall glosse This thing or substance whatsoever undeterminate contained under these formes is my body so much lesse doe these reserve entire the letter and sense of Christs words when instead of them they place their own saying My body is in with under the bread or The bread and the body lying hid invisibly in the bread is my body For neither is the bread alone nor the bread with the body inclosed therein properly Christs body as an empty or full purse is not properly and without all figure of speech termed money Now the phrases they use are too improper and too much unfitting that they would expresse For as for the instances produced by them we know as soone as the Countrey-man Merchant Mother or Vintner speaketh that graine is in the sacke money in the purse an infant in the cradle and wine in the goblet But when these men tell us This is Christs body we know not forth-with that Christs body is in the bread neither can it be proved because an Article of the Christian faith testfieth that it is in heaven Of the Schisme of the Consubstantials LUthers foundation and maine ground at first was those words onely of Christ This is my body Afterwards in a disputation bad with the adversaries of this opinion pinion the 27. and 28. yeere he retired and fled to the Ubiquity and for that one foundation or ground afore-named he assumed four other 1. The personall union of the natures in Christ The right hand of God which is every where 3. The truth of God which cannot lie 4. The three fold manner of the existence of Christs body in any place But being at length repulsed from these holds he betook himselfe againe to Christs words and desired that all disputation of Ubiquity should quite be revoked Notwithstanding since his time some Lutherans by profession finding no sufficient warrant for their cause in Christs words have set Ubiquity on foot againe and at this day account it the best stake in their hedge Three sorts of Lutherans though others utterly disclaime it Hence arose a faction and division among the Consubstantials some are * 1. Simplices simply Lutherans who by Christs words only defend the being of Christs body in the bread and the eating it with the mouth some are * 2. Multipraesentiarii Omnipotentiarii multipresentiarie and omnipotentiarie Lutherans that is such as think Christs body to be present at once in many hosts by reason of the omnipotency really communicated therewith Lastly some are * 3. Omnipraesentiarii Ubiquitarii omnipresentiarie Lutherans who to assoile the presence of Christs body in the bread lay hold on the shield of Ubiquity and teach that Christs body is every where present by vertue of the union with the Word and therefore is present in the bread both before and after the use thereof in the Supper and that the right of consecration doth effect only that it be eaten in the bread Of this our young Divines for the understanding of this controverfie may not be ignorant For hereby they perceive that at this day there are two maine columnes or pillars erected to under-prop Consubstantiation namely The two principall
and from Sabbath to Sabbath shall all flesh come to worship before mee saith the Lord. The externall or ceremoniall Sabbath is a certain time ordained and in stituted by God in the Church dedicated to a ceasing from works and labours and given to the Ministery of Gods Word and to the administration of the Sacraments or to the externall publike worship of God This ceremoniall Sabbath was necessary in the Old Testament to be the seventh day and that on that day as also on other holy dayes the Leviticall ceremonies should be observed This ceremoniall Sabbath is a thing indifferent in the N. Testament This externall Sabbath is also of two sorts Immediate and Mediate Immediate is that which was immediatly instituted by God himselfe and prescribed to the Church of the Old Testament and this was diversly taken in the Old Testament Divers Sabbaths in the Old Testament The Sabbath of daies The Sabbath of dayes was every seventh day of the weeke which was in a more particular sense called the Sabbath both in respect of Gods rest from the Creation of the world and in respect of that rest which was commanded the people of God to be kept on that day Hence the whole seven dayes or the whole weeke was with the Hebrewes called by the name of the chiefe day the Sabbath or Sabbaths Now in the end of the Sabbath Mat. 28.1 when the first day of the Sabbath that is of the week began to dawne Likewise Levit. 23.15 the Sabbaths of daies were other festivall dayes as the feast of the Passeover Whitsontide Tabernacles Trumpets c. because in these feasts the people were to rest as on the seventh day The Sabbath of months The Sabbath of months was the new Moones The Sabbath of yeeres The Sabbath of yeares was every seventh yeere Lâ—v. 25.4 26 35. Levit. 25.8 wherein the Jewes were commanded to intermit the tillage of their fields And hereof also the whole seven yeeres were by a Synecdoche called Sabbaths Thou shalt number seven Sabbaths of yeeres unto thee even seven times seven yeeres The mediate externall Sabbath is that which God doth mediately constitute by his Church in the New Testament such as is the first day of the week to wit Sunday or rather the Lords day which the Christian Church ever since the Apostles time observeth instead of the seventh or Sabbath day in respect of Christs resurrection witnesse that of John I was ravished in spirit on the Lords day Revel 1.10 More briefly thus The ceremoniall Sabbath is twofold one of the old Testament another of the new The old Sabbath was tied to the seventh day and the keeping of it was necessary and was the precise worship of God The new Sabbath dependeth on the arbitrement or appointment of the Church which for certaine causes maketh choice of the first day and that first day is to be observed for orders sake but without any opinion of necessity as if that and no other were to be observed by the Church of which difference more shall be spoken in the Question next ensuing A Table of the distinction of the Sabbath The Sabbath that is to say the ceasing or rest from working is 1. Internall morall and spirituall as the rest from sinne 2. Externall and Ceremoniall instituted by God 1. Immediately in the old Testament as the Sabbath of 1. Dayes which were the 1. Seventh day 2. Feast-dayes of the Passeover Whitsunday c. 2. Months as the new Moones 3. Yeâ—res as every seventh yeare 2. Mediately by the Church in the new Testament as the Lords day 2. How the Sabbath belongeth unto us Christians THe Sabbath of the seventh day was even from the beginning of the world designed by God to signifie that men should after the example of God himself rest from their labours and especially from sinnes and afterwards in Moses law this Commandement was againe repeated and then with all was the ceremony of ceasing from labour on the seventh day ordained to be a Sacrament that is a signe and token of that sanctifying whereby God signifieth himselfe to be the Sanctifier of his Church that is to pardon her all her sinnes and offences to receive her to favour to endue and rule her with his holy Spirit for the beginning of new and everlasting life in her in this life which afterwards should be accomplished and perfected for and by the Messias promised to the Fathers And this is the reason why the Ceremoniall Sabbath of the seventh day is now abolished namely because it was typicall admonishing the people of their own duty towards God of Gods benefits towards them which was to be performed by Christ for which selfe same cause also all the other Sacraments and Sacrifices and ceremonies made before and after the Law were abolished by the coming of Christ by whom that was fulfilled that they signified But although the Ceremoniall Sabbath is abrogated and disannulled in the new Testament yet the Morall Sabbath continueth still and belongeth unto us and doth still remain which is that some time is to be allotted for the Ministery of the Church For as heretofore in the Jewish Church so now in the Christian Church we must ever have some day wherein the Word of God may be taught in the Church and the Sacraments administred But neverthelesse we are not restrained or tied to have either Saturday or Wednesday or any other certaine day For the Apostolike Church to distinguish it selfe from the Jewish Synagogue according to the liberty where-with shee is enfranchised by Christ instead of the seventh day hath on good reason made choice of the first day namely because on that day was Christs resurrection whereby the spirituall and internall Sabbath is begun in us Briefly the Sabbath doth not belong to us Ceremonially in speciall and particular albeit it doth belong to us and so to all men and ever continueth both morally and ceremonially in generall that is wee must have some day wherein the Church may be instructed and the Sacraments administred but wee are not tied to any certaine day Object against the abrogating of the Ceremoniall Sabbath The Jews against the abrogation of the Ceremoniall Sabbath thus urge Ob. 1. The Decalogue is a perpetuall law The commandement of the Sabbath is a part of the Decalogue therefore it is a perpetuall law and not to be abolished Ans The Decalogue is a perpetuall law as it is a Morall law But the Additions or circumstances and limitations of the Morall precepts annexed by way of signification were to be kept untill the coming of the Messias Object 2. The commandements of the Decalogue belong unto all This is a commandement of the Decalogue therefore it belongeth unto all Answ The commandements of the Decalogue which are morall belong unto all But this commandement is in part ceremoniall and so as it is ceremoniall it belongeth not to us albeit the generall belong unto us The reasons
nothing though one should cut or wring it therefore 't is like a scabberd which admits of any sword not of steele only but of wood also or lead or brasse Doth then Parrie lye in this or hath the Jesuite lost his shame But yet they teare and defile the Scripture more miserably for thus Lindanus compares those that dispute out of Scripture to men drawing a woodden saw to whom being wearie there is no end of deluding Hosius in his book De expresso Dei verbo throughout it all handles these Positions That it is the propertie of Hereticks to dispute out of the Scriptures That they must not encounter with Hereticks out of the Scriptures That the Scriptures make Hereticks That the expresse word of God being alledged by Hereticks Protestants he meanes against the sense of all other that is of the Popish Church is the expresse word of the Divell We will not speak of other abominable passages which neither Jewes could attribute to Moses his Law nor Mahumetans to their Alchoran without punishment If heretofore such words had been spoken of Sibylla's leaves the Romans had punished them with death Yet for these or the like meritorious words by which they think they have cut off the Protestant sinews one receives a Bishops robe another a Cardinals Hat as a reward from the Pope O say they scoffingly what conferres your Scripture on you But boast not in thy wickednesse Psal 52.3 Pag. 24. the goodnesse of the Lord is powerfull every day But saith the Jesuite this is devised by Parrie Whitaker and such like deformed Reformers That in Popery the Scriptures are as much accounted as Aesops Fables without the Churches testimony That the Pope preferres the Church to the Scripture That in Popery they deny the word of God to be the rule of living and beleeving aright I answer that nothing of this is objected to us in the secular Theme why then doe you passe by things truly objected and accuse Poperie of these things Cover if you be wise the ulcers of your Babylon The first concerning Aesops Fables Brentius objected to Peter Asoto a black Friar anno 1556. Hee doth not obscurely saith hee intimate that hee hath plainly the same opinion of the Scriptures that any other Asoticus hath or hath written of to wit that the Scripture availeth as much as Aesops Fables without the Churches authority To whom Hosius answering anno 1557. saith thus This might be spoken in a pious meaning which any godly man endued with charity and that thinkes no evill might draw out of these words For truly if the Churches authority did not teach us that this Scripture is Canonicall it should have but little weight with us I pray you then how can you denie Poperie to be of this opinion which Hosius so great a pillar of the Romish Church confesseth may be spoken in a pious sense Tell me then what odds is there between these words To have a very little weight and between these To availe as much as Aesops Fables I wonder you touch the other sore Lib. de Concil col 12.13 which the chiefest of your side doe avoid willingly as a rock in the sea Bellarmine hath so touched it that hee equalls the Decrees of Councels in truth infallibilitie and Canonicall authoritie to the Gospels and holy Scriptures and extolls the Pope far above Decrees of Councels How then is the Pope according to Bellarmine not preferred to Scripture As for the third though we know not who objecteth it to you as you utter it yet it is doubtlesse true For according to the same Cardinall of yours the word of God written is but a partiall rule of right living and beleeving But a partiall rule is no rule if you will urge the nature of a rule for a rule in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is an infallible rule requiring or admitting of no addition or diminution to this that it may be a rule as the Jesuite knowes a rule to be defined by Basil and Varinus If then in Poperie the written word of God be but a partiall law of good life and faith not onely admitting but requiring also the addition of traditions it followes that this is plainly denied in Poperie which this fellow lies was devised by Parrie to wit that the written word of God is the rule of right living and beleeving 22. Lastly what Irenaeus wrote of ancient Hereticks when Roman Poperie is argued out of Scriptures it is turned to the accusation of the very Scriptures as if they were not right or had any authoritie and because they are diversly taken and because truth cannot be found out of them that want tradition 23. Roman Poperie then so many waies the originall of faith which is beleeved by tearing in pieces and blaspheming is deficient from the faith it overthrows faith both to it selfe and to its friends The Assertion If at this day Irenaeus that most ancient defender of the holy Scriptures against Hereticks did see our present controversies what else would he say think you against Poperie then what he wrote against the traditionarie Hereticks of his time that they cannot abide an encounter when they are convicted out of Scripture but fall upon accusing of the very words of God and that three waies First that they are not of authoritie Secondly that they are diversly spoken obscure doubtfull That finally they are imperfect not containing all truth At last they fix upon traditions which they think to be more perfect then the Scriptures they received from the Apostles All the Popish Masters now these hundred yeers past have after no other way handled this argument then what was the proper way of Hereticks of old For as often as they are convicted by our men out of Scripture do not they disswade any meeting or encounter That it is a vaine thing to draw a woodden saw with us Doe they not fall upon accusing the Scriptures themselves that they have no authoritie but what they have from the Church That they are most obscure and diversly spoken That by reason of their imperfection all truth cannot be found in them Doth not at length all their disputation end in tradition See the disputes and discourses of the Scriptures in Bellarmine Stapleton Lindanus Hosius Valentian and others Poperie then I hope understands whose successors the Scholastick Synagogues and Canonisticall in this part are and what principle of faith which is beleeved hath by unworthy tearing and blaspheming fallen from the faith and hath made the way of salvation unpassable both to it selfe and friends 24. Secondly to shake saving Faith by which we beleeve unto righteousnesse and to pull it out of mens hearts is to fail from the Faith and to overthrow faith both to themselves and others 25. Saving faith by which we beleeve unto righteousnesse is not onely an assent or knowledge of these things which concerning God and Christ are written in Gods Word but especially a confidence in the promises of the
never knowne to him whom finally as accutsed workers of iniquity he will cast into hell fire But you will say Christ died for all therefore rose againe for all The Answer is double One is As often as the Gospell extends the fruits of the works and benefits of Christ to all this is to be understood of all those that beleeve in Christ for this is the perpetuall and constant voice of the Gospell He that beleeveth shall be saved he shall not come into judgement who beleeveth not is already condemned and the wrath of God remaineth upon him Therefore the Gospell debarres from the benefits of Christ all Infidels not onely by a plaine exclusion but also by that condition of faith and repentance under which either expresly or tacitly God promiseth to men the benefits of Christ and which is never to be found in those that persevere in sin So then Christ is said to die for all to wit all that do or shall beleeve in him for whom alone he prayed and in whom alone he findes the faith of his death but as for Infidels and Reprobates for whom Christ prayed not whom he never acknowledged for his owne upon whom the wrath of God abideth for ever John 17.9 Mat. 7.23 John 3.36 Mat. 7.6 to extend I say on these the benefits of Christ what is it else but agâ—â—nst his owne command To give that which is holy unto dogs and to cast pearles before swine These we could solidly defend by authority of Scripture and orthodox Fathers and they mainely concerne Christian consolation There is an other Answer usuall in the Schooles by which we may gratifie the contentious that Christ absolutely died for all if you consider the amplitude and sufficiency of his price and merit for it is out of controversie that the death of the Son of God is of that value that it sufficeth to expiate the sins not onely of one but of millions of worlds if so be they had faith to apply this Physick to their sins But the Question is properly of the efficacy and participation it selfe of these fruits when we demand if Christ died for all Because to die for another is properly to die in the stead and place of another so that he is freed from death and saved alive as when David weeping cryed out I wish I had died for thee O Absalom that is I wish I had died in thy stead that thou mightest have lived But we utterly deny that this participation of Christs merits is common to all unbeleevers as well as to those that beleeve or that this is promised or exhibited in the Gospell for in this regard we conclude that Christ did not die properly for all even for unbeleevers and reprobates But here some unluckie patrons of Infidels taking it ill that we do not divide the pearles equally amongst sheepe and swine cry out that we deny the bloud of Christ and that we produce a Saracenicall Mahumeticall and more then an Heathenish blasphemy which utterly overthroweth Christian Religion But Sirs it is not our purpose to encounter or contend with such rayling pratlers But first we protest against such bitter calumnies making our appeale to the unanimous consent of the orthodoxall Church and the perpetuall voice of the Gospell that we deny not but honour the bloud of Christ when we say it is poured out not for those that slight it and tread Christ under their feet but for those who by faith are justified through it as the Apostle saith Whom God hath given to be an atonement by faith in his bloud Heb. 10.29 Rom. 3.25 Rev. 1.5 1 John 1.7 to declare his righteousnesse by the remission of sins that went before for this is not the voice of Infidels Who hath washed us in his bloud from our sinnes and that The bloud of Jesus Christ cleanseth us from all sin Out of Gods word we know and beleeve that this is no Saracenicall Mahumeticall and more then Heathenish blasphemy as this calumny doth impudently blaspheme but that it is the genuine true and saving doctrine of the Gospell of Jesus Christ and this we are ready at all times â—o demonstrate before the whole Church Besides we hold it worth the while and necessary with as much brevity as may be to pull off from these Wolves the Sheeps-skins with which they are clothed and to paint out in its owne colours this their prodigious doctrine which cunningly lurks under the calumny 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which under this they goe about to bring into the Church They contend That Christ dyed for all Who denieth this for this is the Scripture phrase They adde That he dyed for all and singular Neither doe wee simply deny this to wit in that sense which we shewed a little before although we do not find the Scripture speak so They go on That he dyed for all and singular alike for the elect and reprobate for Cain and David for Judas and Peter for the damned as well as for those that are saved without any respect of faith or infidelity This is hard They proceed finally That he dyed for all and singular not onely in respect of sufficiencie but also in regard of the efficacie of the price But what is this to wit That Christ by his death hath truly delivered from death purged from sin sanctified and reconciled to God all absolutely even those who are not saved but have been damned ever since Cain and are damned and furthermore are to be damned all those they say he hath received into his favour This is that impious monster by which they conclude another no lesle impious and false to wit That wicked men whosoever have perished doe or shall perish that they have perished doe and shall perish not for their sins for they were expiated by the bloud of Christ but onely for their incredulity They who have read their Books and Disputations will confesse that this is no fiction of ours But how monstrous are these to Christian eares These brave patrons of wicked men teach that all wicked and impure dogs before and after the death of Christ are received into the bosome and favour of God But we say first That this is a false and impious doctrine because it plainly opposeth Scripture which continually cries out that wicked men so long as they remaine without faith and repentance are not in the favour of God but that they remaine the sons of wrath and of eternall malediction That they are not delivered from sin and death but are held captives by the snares of the Divell and are strongly deluded yea that they are already condemned and are under the wrath of God Againe we affirme that this is a most absurd monster which overthrowes many principles of Christian faith and it selfe also For now let us set downe and examine their Position All men without exception faithfull and unfaithfull before and since the death of Christ are truely and undoubtedly by the bloud