communion of the Spirit according to the election of God which is ever accompanied with perseverance Doctor Featly in his Pelagius redivivus hath these words which being so pertinent I shall transcribe Second parallel p. 38. To the place alledged Rom. 11. 19 20. We Answer saith he First that it is not meant of particular Beleevers and their danger of falling away from justifying Faith but of the people of the Gentiles in general and their danger of being cut off from the true Olive into which they were ingraffed that is from the outward profession of Faith and communion of the Catholick Church into whith they were admitted upon the rejection of the Jewes The Gentiles therefore ought not to be high-minded against the Jewes but fear lest God who spared not the natural branches should not spare them but cut them off also as he did the natural branches if they should grow proud and presumptuously secure Now there is no question but that a visible Church which at this time professeth the truth and is a Member of the Catholick Church may fall away from the outward and publick profession of faith and cease to be a part of the Catholick visible Church as the most famous and sometimes flourishing Church in Greece and Asia planted by the Apostles themselves now over-runne with Mahometanisme Idolatry and Heresie prove by their lamentable Apostasie deplorable if not desperate estate But Bertius and the Appealer should have their eyes upon the mark and point in question which is not in the doctrine of Faith but of the habit of faith not de fide quam credimus but de fide quâ credimus not of the publick profession of a Church but of a particular affiance of every true beleever in Christ A Member of the visible Church may be cut off but no Member of the invisible for Christ cannot have damnâ—ta membra any Members who shall not be saved as the approver of the Appealers book rightly gathereth out of Saint Austine in his reply to Fisher A Church or Kingdome generally may depart from the Christian Faith or renounce the pure profession thereof in publick and yet no true Beleever either totally or finally lose his Faith but either secretly in that state or Kingdome or else-where openly he may retaine both Faith it self and the profession thereof So Peter Martyr Loc. Com. pag. 491. speaking to those words Be not high-minded but fear Neither saith he is there here speech concerning particular men but of the whole company and body of beleevers deservedly therefore the Apostle doth warne them Be not high minded but fear For as the Church of the Jews hath ceased to be and also Africa Grâ—cia and Asia have lost many Churches so it is to be feared lest the same may now happen to Churches which seeme to stand let them not therefore lift up themselves 〈◊〉 â—n the words Thou standest by faith saith He speaks of the generality of Jewes and Gentiles and upon these words Be not high-minded but fear saith He speaks to the Gentiles in general from many of whom as is to be bewailed the Kingdom of God is taken away as at first from the Jews as Persians Arabians Syrians Egyptians Asians and many others so that this Authour hath lost not only this Argument but this whole Text For if Reconciliation World Riches be thus understood and cutting off in like manner then he sees this Chapter in the whole against him and in no part for him And if any Writer against Arminians understand by the World Rom. 11. 15. onely the Elect unlesse they mean an Election into a Church-state they do but give advantage to them there is not meant universally the whole world that is too large not yet they that shall be eternally saved out of the world that is too strict but the men whom God perswades of Japhet to dwell in the Tents of Shem all Nations dispersed through the world at the last Annotations on verse 12. Argument 3. Thirdly The ingraffing must be meant of that act whereby the branch stands in the tree as a branch this will none deny it being the very terminus of ingraffing as heat the terminus of calefaction but that is by giving Faith Ergo. The minor is proved from verse 20. where it is said By unbelief they were broken off but thou standest by faith whence I argue That act whereby the branch stands in the tree as a branch must be the giving that means whereby the branch thus stands But that is Faith v. 20. Ergo the act of ingraffing is by giving Faith Answ Here I shall willingly grant the conclusion and do affirm that it is by Faith that grown persons whether Jews or Gentiles do stand in a visible Church-fellowship such a faith upon which all called ones among which few are Elect are admitted Such a faith that gave Simon Magus title that Hymeneus had of which he made shipwrack 1 Tim. 1. 19. Doctor Featley in the words above mentioned shewing Bertius and the Appealer their fallacy shews this objector his The Apostle speaks of the Doctrine of Faith this objector of the habit The Apostle speaks de fide quam credimus this objector speaks de fide qua credimus The Apostle speaks of the publick profession of a Church He of a particular affiance of every Beleever in Christ He addes This conceit I conceived and still think is so farre from the Apostles expressions that there seemes to be no shew of such a sense in the words giving in his reason For there is not a word of taking into the Olive but by Faith verse 19 20. There is indeed here no shew of reason unlesse it can be affirmed that there is no faith but the Faith of the Elect and that which is justifying therefore if it please the Authour I shall enter the lists with him in these three Positions 1. That Faith is taken in more acceptions then one in Scripture All Faith doth not entitle to the Church invisible and therefore there is scarce shew of sense in his reason disputing from the Genus to the Species affirmativè or from the Analogum to the Analogatum 2. That the Faith here spoken to is as Doctor Featly asserts the doctrine of Faith not the habit Faith of Profession and not a particular affiance fides quam and not fides qua credimus and so the fallacy is clear and it will no more follow that the ingraffing is into the Church invisible because it is by faith then it will follow that because bruits have souls that therefore they have reasonable souls 3. That there is no such thing in all Scripture as ingraffing into the Church inuisible by Faith All ingraffing is into the body visible and therefore by a faith of profession 1. All ingraffing is into that subject which immediately receives what is ingraffed as the stock receives the syens but it is Christ and not the Church invisible that receives the Elect Beleever Christ
of the Church of the Jewes so Hereticks are of the Church in Gospel-times 2 Pet. 2. 1. The Apostle tells the Elders of Ephesus Acts 20. 30. Of your own selves shall men arise speaking perverse things to draw away Disciples after them For Witches though there were a Law in Israel not to suffer a Witch to live Exod. 22. 18. Yet Israel had Witches as is seen in those that Saul put out of the Land and her that in his distresse he sought unto 1 Sam. 28. Paul had never reckoned up witchcraft among those sinnes that shut out of the Kingdome of heaven and certified the Churches of Galatia of it had there been an impossibility that any such should be found of their number that made claime to it This the Reverend Authour doth as much as acknowledge in the words that follow I deny not saith he but that in some sense any such notorious offendor may have the essence and being of a member of the Church as visible to wit in this sense a corrupt and rotten member fit to be cut off A member of the visible Church though formerly an inoffensive professor of the faith may afterwards fall away into any of these notorious scandals and yet for a while still retain the essence and being of a member of the Church as visible Master Rutherford that is there opposed I suppose will affirme no more Respective to the power of godlinesse there is in them no soundnesse nor yet in those that are better than these Some say that one that is such in any known foule sinne to them is no better than a Heathen as bad as a Turke or Pagan and nothing at all better for the name Christian And I say that to me they are as bad as to them and perhaps worse in the eyes of God This priviledge in which they stand thus interessed is an aggravation of their sinne and a farther provocation of God against them When the Lord saw it he abhorred them because of the provoking of his sonnes and of his daughters Deut. 32. 19. yet such is Gods long-suffering and forbearance of them that he is pleased to vouchsafe them farther and more large evidences of his favour Nehem. 9. 30. Hierusalem was corrupted more than Sodom and Samaria in all her wayes Ezek. 16. 47. Sodom and her daughters had not done as Hierusalem and her daughters ver 48. Samaria had not committed halfe her sinnes ver 51. In her abominations she had justified both of them yet Hierusalem enjoyed those priviledges that Samaria and Sodom enjoyed not Hierusalem was in covenant ver 16. when Sodom and Samaria were no covenant-people but worshipped they knew not what John 4. ver 22. Corazin and Bethsaida Cities of Israel were no better in the eye of God than Tyre and Sidon yea their sinnes deserved an heavier weight of judgement Matth. 11. 22. It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sydon at the day of judgement than for you saith our Saviour and so it was with Capernaum compared to Sodom ver 23. yet Chorazin Bethsaida Capernaum enjoyed those priviledges from God that Tyre Sydon and Sodom wanted As the Apostles zeal against the Samaritanes sinnes Luke 9. 54 did out-strip our Saviours when they would have fire from heaven to consume them so our zeale out-goes Gods when we would have such men root and branch parent and child struck out of covenant before God hath sued out any Bill of divorce against them or removed his Candlestick and taken all covenant-priviledges from them For the baptism of children of Apostates there is a greater difficulty Some of reverend worth say They see not how justly a Parents Apostasy should deprive the childe of Baptisme and some Texts of Scripture seem strongly to favour that opinion Ezek. 16. 20 21. Moreover thou hast taken thy sonnes and thy daughters whom thou hast borne unto me and these hast thou sacrificed unto them to be devoured Is this of thy whoredomes a small matter that thou hast slain my children and delivered them to cause them to passe through the fire for them There could not be an higher evidence of Apostacy than to give their children in sacrifice to a false god It was one of the highest acts of obedience that Abraham could testifie to the Lord and yet these yield it to Idol-gods They bring forth children to God and give them to Moloch Psal 106. 35 36 37 38 39. They were mingled among the heathen and learned their works and they served their Idols which were a snare unto them yea they sacrificed their sons and daughters unto devils And shod innocent blood even the blood of their sonnes and of their daughters whom they sacrificed unto the Idols of Canaan and the land was polluted with blood Thus were they defiled with their own works and went a whoring with their own inventions These in this apostatized from God in covenant yet God lookes upon them as a covenant people ver 45. And he remembred for them his covenant c. But this seemes to be but a partial Apostasy taking in the worship of Idols they did not totally cast off the worship of God A line of profession was still it seemes held up God was not wholly cast off in Judah They seem to be of those that swore by the Lord and Malcham Zeph. 1. 5. keeping up the worship of the true God and yet take in the worship of a false god with him As for those in whom Master Firmin instanceth our Englishmen now in Turkey apostatized from the Faith to that Religion concerning whom quaeres are often put it may seem equal that as a man comes into covenant and his posterity with him So totally rejecting the covenant denying God as well in profession as in his works that he and his posterity should be out of covenant Being before an holy root to transmit holinesse to his seed now he becomes unholy and put out of such capacity and is disabled from making over any such priviledge to them But here we need not to trouble our selves with the Baptisme of such having renounced Christ they baptize not their infants in his name A Minister shall have none of these rendered to him and to baptize them into this body when he well knowes they must be never suffered to be of it were an high taking of Gods name in vaine and a mockery of so sacred an Ordinance Now in case a grandfather shall take one of these children and offer it unto Baptisme and being a Progenitor shall undertake the education in the Christian Faith and not in the Turkish abomination whether in this case there be right to Baptisme is the question Now these may be looked upon either as meer Heathens in the same condition as if they never had an Ancestor in the Faith or else as issuing out of the loynes of mediate Ancestors believing and so coming from a root that hath been holy If considered in the former way they may have a title to
different and consequently either make two covenants of grace distinct in kind or thrust all that were under the Old covenant out of all hope of salvation contrary to all Interpreters who make these covenants one in substance See the last larger Annotations on the words 2. Whether such an Interpretation do not utterly contradict New-Testament-light which holds out the New covenant in like latitude with the former in which many are called but few are chosen and where conditions are as explicitely and fully required as in Old Testament dispensations 3. Whether when Scripture speaks of things in opposition to mens erroneous conceits for a further Explanation of them and rectifying mens judgements in them it do usually lay down a full compleat and formal definition to which nothing is to be added or whether it doth not usually supply that in which men through mistake were defective and short And whether those Texts Esay 58 6 7. Is not this the fast that I have chosen to loose the bands of wickednesse to undo the heavy burdens and to let the oppressed go free and that ye break every yoak Is it not to deal thy bread to the hungry and that thou bring the poor that are cast out into thy house when thou seest the naked that thou cover him and that thou hide not thy self from thy own flesh Jer. 22. 15 16. Did not thy father eat and drink and do justice and judgement and then it was well with him He judged the cause of the poor and needy and then it was well with him was not this to know me saith the Lord Jam. 1. 27. Pure Religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this to visit the fatherlesse and widows in their affliction and to keep himself unspotted from the world are not parallel to this text in their way of delivery And in case we cannot finde a full definition of a religious Fast in that of Esay nor the whole of it that makes up saving knowledge in that of Jeremy nor the whole that makes Religion compleat in that of James why is it that we should earnestly contend that the full nature of a covenant is in this text exprest being fully parallel in the way of delivery to those other texts Thirdly it is upon the account of the outward Covenant and not the inward that men enjoy priviledges of Ordinances and interest in Sacraments Men that are so far honoured as to enjoy an outward covenant have just title to these priviledges It is in behalf of the Jew outwardly that the Apostle having so decryed his condition respective to the approbation of God puts the question What advantage hath the Jew what profit is there of Circumcision Rom. 3. 1. The Jew and Circumcision are there one A Jew outwardly and circumcision in the flesh go there in equal latitude He that by nature is a Jew as Paul speaks Gal. 2. 15. is of the circumcision And to these the Oracles of God are committed The instruments deeds and evidences of the covenants say the last Annotations It was the priviledge of Israel Psal 147. 19. Rom. 3. and then the priviledg of no other Nation Now it is the priviledg of all ingraffed in their stead This is confest even by a great part of those that understand the inward covenant or covenant keeping to acceptation almost whensoever they mention a covenant in that they baptize infants upon covenant grounds even all their infants that make a covenant profession and that upon just warranty It is further plaine in reason The outward covenant must have priviledges suitable to it self otherwise there is no manner of benefit or advantage of it This priviledge of the Sacrament is suitable being outward as the covenant is outward This is elsewhere spoken to at large and therefore I shall hear forbear I have indeed been challenged for this distinction of an outward and inward covenant as though I had been the sole Authour of it when all know that it is a distinction that of a long time among Divines hath been in common use and in case it had not been commonly received I should have forborne the use of it As I heard Mr. Ball once in discourse say that he denyed any such distinction of an outward and an inward call to the Ministery all calling being external unlesse the man called were a Prophet that which men terme an inward call being onely qualifications fitting for the work So that I deny in exact propriety of speech the inward covenant is any covenant but the answer of the soul unto that which the covenant requires And whereas it is said of me by way of conjecture It is probable that he thus distributes them from the blessings promised whereof some are inward and some outward for though he explain not himself fully yet I know no other sense that it will bear To this I say that I thus distinguish them to apply my self to the Readers understanding that hath been accumstomed so to call them and further I say that men that barely covenant and keep not covenant have onely priviledges that are outward They are visible Church-members and they have visible Church-priviledges and those who answer to covenant engagements which usually is called the inward covenant have priviledges both outward and inward A Jew outwardly had outward priviledges A Jew inwardly that is he that answered to his outward profession that worshipped God in spirit hath both those that were outward and inward It is further said It is evident that his outward Covenant hath no seal for it is a Covenant de sigillis conferendis If therefore it have a seal it is either the same which is promised or some other What this Authour means when he says it is a covenant de sigillis conferendis I am to learn If he mean that the seal follows the covenant and is put to after the covenant so it is in all covenants whatsoever He sayes they no where tell us what is the seal of their outward covenant me thinks we had no need to tell what the seal of that covenant was that the Jew entered was it not circumcision and did there not another follow viz. the Passeover Now I tell him that Circumcision and the Passeover were and Baptisme and the Lords Supper are seales of this covenant The Nation of the Jewes were in covenant as our Authour though he would yet must not deny They were not all in the inward covenant and yet they had these seales He says we are bound to give the seals to such Vocation which is effectual only to bring men to an outward profession of saving faith is larger then election and makes men such whom we are bound to baptize And such we say have right to them And to help him a little further Those men that he sayes the Church must baptize though without right we say are truely in covenant and have right when he knows what a childe he is to baptize he
in some Old Testament Texts is used as also the Latine word Foedus in prophane Authors All of which shews no more but that the word in the exact denotation and largest sense of it imports no more then an ordination or disposition yet that hinders not but that as Interpreters generally render it so the received and accustomed use of it is to hold out a covenant bargaine or agreement As the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in its largest sense comprizes any Assembly even for civil uses Acts 19. 39. yea rude congregated routs verse 41. yet in the generally received sense it is taken for holy Assemblies So it is with Berith the word may admit of a large sense but the received sense is with more restriction The Jews had their covenants man with man Abraham with Abimelech Gen. 21. 72. Isaac with Abimelech Gen. 26. 28. Laban with Jacob Gen. 31. 44. And this was the word whereby they did expresse their covenants And as the word Church is sometimes used improperly for Church Members that make not up a whole Church The Church in Aquila and Priscilla 's house Rom. 16. 5. Sometimes for Church-officers Matth. 18. 17. Tell it to the Church who could not be the whole Church whereof infants are a part or as all must confesse women who yet are no competent judges so there are improper acceptions of the word covenant when the proper sense is that which hath been held out which is a mutual compact or agreement on terms and Propositions The learned observe that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 properly answers to the word Berith Ravanellus observes out of Hierome that Aquila and Symmachus did so translate it and Rivet on Genes Exercit. 135. saith That which the Septuagint and Theodotio call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that Symmachus translates 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pactum foedus which saith he is the proper signification of the Hebrew word Berith which word is not read in the Old Testament for the ordering of a mans Will or Testament Now it is not denyed but the word foedus and pactum in Latine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greek covenant in English do signifie mutual contracts in which there are mutual performances and so the Hebrew word Berith in like manner this being according to the learned the genuine signification of it And if this were not the received signification of it how did the Objection before mentioned ever come into any mans head that the Apostle did bewray ignorance in the Scripture-use of the word in applying it to a mans Will or Testament and what needed so much pains for his defence in it Hierome on those words Gal 3. 17. This I say that the Testament confirmed of God saith If any compare the Hebrew volumes and other Editions with the translation of the Septuagint he shall find that where Testament is written it doth not signifie a Testament but a Covenant which in the Hebrew tongue is called Berith And in case Gods whole dispensations and Gospel-communications as Junius would have it be a Testament onely and no covenant why is the world so abused with the word foedus pactum in Latine covenant in English By which all men understand that which we call a covenant no man understands a Testament why do we say covenant of Works covenant of grace if the former onely were a covenant properly and the other a Testament as though we should cal an Eagle and a Lion both by the common name of a bird perswading that a Lion were a bird as well as an Eagle yet if it were a Testament properly so called it would not overthrow the conditionality as Mr. Grayl out of Swynborn shews Testaments have their conditions How comes it to pass that Scripture holds out so frequently that similitude of a marriage Is 54. 5. Hos 2. 19. 2 Cor. 11. 2. Eph. 5. 32. to set out this transaction A marriage contract is not a mans Testament hath a wife barely a Legacie and doth she enter no covenant with her husband How comes it to passe that turning aside from God after other lovers is called in Scripture by the name of whoredomes adulteries which is the breach of a marriage-covenant and how is sin against God called a dealing falsely with God we cannot deale falsely in the covenant if it be not a covenant but a Testament men may carry themselves unthankfully but falsehood argues an engagement How is it that we finde in Old and New Testament-Scriptures mutuall engagements between God and his people of God to them of them to him in case God hath vouchsafed them a Legacie by Testament in the death of his Son and left them out of covenant And how is that without Covenant without Christ without God without Hope with the Apostle are one and the same when yet all people that have hope in Christ are out of covenant There be that say The holy Writers do illustrate the New covenant rather by the Metaphor of a Testament then a covenant These seeme to make it neither a Covenant nor a Testament Every one knows that a Metaphor is a figure whereby a word is carried out of its proper signification into some other that carries resemblance with it In case there be a metaphor in that expression then it is not proper but borrowed But as I beleeve that Abraham spake not by a Metaphor to God when he said Gen. 18. 25. Shall not the Judge of all the world do right God absolving and and condemning the sons of men giving rewards and inflicting penalties is a Judge properly so called so I do not think that God spake in any Metaphor to Abraham when in the chapter before Gen. 17. 7. he saith I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee God is a Judge of all the earth properly so called and he hath entred a covenant with his people properly so called likewise It is true that we understand that relation of God to his people more clearly by the Analogy that it bears to Judges that are set up among men for absolution of the innocent condemning of the guilty And so we are holpen in our understandings of the covenant of God entred with his people by Analogy with the covenants that are among men but in neither of both of these is the word taken out of its proper sense and applyed to any other that it will not properly bear I finde indeed an eminent Divine affirming That a covenant is not so properly said to be with God and man as between man and man not denying the duty which man owes to God nor the engagement by which he is obliged but freely yeelding both and sticking only at the consent on mans part which among men he sayes is requisite and doth mutually concur to make the covenant valid But neither in the covenant of nature or grace is this consent anteceding the validity of the covenant required in man This I confesse
Prophets 1 Cor. 12. 28. The Holy Ghost hath here an hand Acts 13. 2. The holy Ghost said Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them Acts 20. 28. Take heed therefore unto your selves and to all the flock over which the holy Ghost hath made you overseers to feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own blood And this sending or authorizing is as their gifting or fitting either extraordinary and immediate nothing of man intervening or else mediate by mans Ministery and his approbation Paul had both an immediate way both his authority and ability for the work he professes that he is an Apostle not of man nor by man he owes it not to man as the Authour so may any Minister of Christ say he owes it not to man as an instrument so only Prophets and Apostles can say As his Calling was thus immediate so in like sort was his instructions for it Gal. 1. 12. For I neither received if of man neither was I taught it but by the Revelation of Jesus Christ They that divide these are exceedingly to blame assuming authority without man but confessing that for abilities as they must look up to God so they must make use of man must apply themselves to reading and make use of the helps of others The immediate Call is by Vision Revelation or whatsoever otherway God pleases to manifest himself Thus in a vision Paul was called where that is not the mediate Call only remains which is the way of all that attaine to gifts by education study and the blessing of heaven on their endeavours This is called as in Scripture so in Church-writers by the name of Ordination and the whole work containing as well that which is essential to it as the adjuncts of it may be thus described An act of men in a Ministerial function associated in a Presbytery setting some apart upon proof and examination as Presbyters and Elders in the Church by fasting and praying with imposition of hands We find no other but men in Ministerial function in all the holy Scriptures acting in it Paul and Barnabas ordaine Elders in every Church which in their journal they visite Acts 14. 23. Timothy is directed in the way of it 1 Tim. 5. 22. Lay hands suddenly on no man Titus is enjoyned to ordaine Elders in every City in Creet Tit. 1. 5. He is named alone but the naming of one excludes not others and therefore it appears that in Timothies Ordination a Presbytery or a combination of Presbyters did joyne 1 Tim. 4. 14. which way in our Church hath ever been held The Bishop supposed by some to be vested in the whole power of Ordination never had authority to ordaine alone but grave Presbyters according to the Canon were to joyn with him though by reason of greatnesse his vote ordinarily did overmuch sway in it Some would have the people here to have their hand in that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that place of the Acts chap. 14. 23. implies a lifting up of the hand But whatsoever the word in its Etymology may imply the use is not such as is plaine by comparing Acts 10. 41. where the immediate Ordination of God by the same word is held forth unto us They know the weight of the Ministerial function and they are best able to judge of requisite abilities One that is willing to give as much to the people as may be yet confesses that in Grammatical construction the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 can agree with no other but Paul and Barnabas and that it was only their act and therefore he would finde it in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which saith he doth not signifie in every Church as it is translated but according to the Church instancing in the Orators phrase Faciam secundumte I will do it according to thy minde So they viz. Paul and Barnabas ordained them Elders according to the Church that is according to the minde and will of the Church If this were granted it would only conclude an acquiescency in the people and that they had satisfaction in that Ordination carryed on by Paul and Barnabas Yet this phrase here can no where prove that the Church or people made choise of them then we man prove from that injunction of the Apostle Titus 1. 5. to ordaine Elders in every City that the whole City had there their vote in Elections As much stresse may be laid upon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in every City or according to the minde of the City in this of Paul to Titus as upon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in every Church or according to the minde of the Church in that of Luke in the History of the Acts. What power the people or the faithful may have in Election and how farre it may be convenient that they may be overborne for their good I will not here dispute I only conclude that we finde not the people any where ordaining we read of Ordination in Churches for the Churches use not Ordination by Churches taking it in that sense for the whole community of Beleevers These in a Ministerial function in this act of Ordination set select men apart for Presbyters or Elders so Acts 14. 23. Titus 1. 5. Titus is enjoyned to ordaine Elders in every City in Creet who are the same with Bishops as appeares in Titus 1. verse 5. 7. compared The qualification of Elders is there prescribed and the reason is given for a Bishop must be blamelesse which will hold no congruity if an Elder be not the same with a Bishop Which also may be seen Acts 20. comparing ver 17. and the 28. together The Apostle there speaks to the Elders of Ephesus and he gives them a charge to take heed to all the flâ—ck over which the Holy Ghost had made them Overseers that is had given them an Episcopal charge as the word signifies Elders must set apart men for Elders and Presbyters are to be set apart by a Presbytery This Ordination of Elders is to be in the Church or for the Church which may be taken either for the universal Church visible or for some particular Church and that either congregational or classical Ministerial functions are appointed of God for the Church universal visible God hath set some in the Church first Apostles secundarily Prophets thirdly Teachers c. 1 Cor. 12 28. No one particular Church congregational or classical enjoys all the particular kindes there enumerated yet so as the exercise of this function is to be with limit to one particular only They are Ministers of the Church universal yet so as orderly to exercise their function only there where God by his providence shall designe them There are some functions as I may say Catholick what such a one doth any where in his function is good every where as a publick Notary or Master of the Chancery that which they
the Sonne of God and do despite unto the Spirit of grace but unto Christ himself Christ was sanctified they say with this blood This indeed clearly takes this Text out of their hands that would from thence inferre the Apostasie of sanctified that is regenerate persons And if this hold it as little serves our purpose Here is Christ in covenant but no reprobate or wicked person in covenant But this reference of the words and the interpretation which is grounded on it hath I suppose come into the thoughts of few Interpreters and it seemes to be very much strained the scope of the place being for aggravation of their sinne that set themselves against the Sonne of God and the holy Spirit The common interpretation which is obvious and clearly held out in the Text fully vindicates it from any favour shew'd to the doctrine of Apostasie of the Saints and fully confirmes the point in hand There is a sanctification by separation for God and dedication to him as there is by inhesion and infusion Master Dixon on the words having so fully spoke my thoughts I had rather expresse my selfe in his words than my own putting the Question How the reprobate can be said to be sanctified by the blood of the covenant answers There is a sanctification to the purifying of the flesh and a sanctification to the purifying of the conscience from dead works to serve the living God Heb 9. 13 14. The sanctification external to the purifying of the flesh consisteth in the mans separation from the world and dedication unto Gods service by calling and Covenant common to all the members of the visible Church and it is forcible thus farre as to bring a man into credit and estimation as a Saint before men and unto the common priviledges of the Church whereupon as men so God also speaketh unto him and of him as one of his people and dealeth with him in his external dispensation as with one of his own people In this sense all the Congregation of Israel and every one of them is called holy yea Core also and his followers Num. 16. 3. The sanctification internall by renovation consisteth in a mans separation from the state of nature to the state of grace from his old conditions to be a new creature indeed by this latter sort a reprobate cannot be called sanctified but by the former he may be called sanctified and that by vertue of the blood of the covenant albeit he should not get any farther good thereby for as the blood of Christ hath vertue to cleanse the conscience and â—â—nue the soul which cometh unto it truely and spiritually so it must have force to do that which is lesse that is purifie the flesh and external condition of the man who cometh unto it outwardly only as the types did under the Law whereupon an hypocrite in the Christian Church must be accounted one of the congregation of the Saints as well as an hypocrite under the Law was so called because Christs blood cannot be inferiour to the Types which were of this force to sanctifie men to the purifying of the flesh Or we may say more shortly There is a sanctification by consecration when any thing is devoted or dedicated unto God and a sanctification by inhabitation of the holy Spirit 2 Cor. 6. 17. 18. Of the former sort the Censeres of Corah Dathan and Abiram are called holy and the reason is given Because they offered them before the Lord therefore they are hallowed Num. 16. 38. And in this sedse all the members of the visible Church even such as afterwards do prove Apostates are sanctified because they offered and offer themselves unto the Lord. But the inhabitation of the holy Spirit is proper onely to the elect and Gods children To the same purpose Paraeus on the words The sanctification of Apostates was not internal saith he but external consisting in the profession of Faith and participation of the Sacraments They were sanctified that is separate from the Jews and Pagans in profession and accounted for true Christians In the same sense as men are ordinarily called Saints as after we shall hear so those that are turned Apostates were sanctified by the blood of the covenant and therefore were men in covenant Neither can all the noise that hath been made about that Text 1 Pet. 2. 9. adversaries take it off but that it speaks fully to hold up a covenant in this latitude and from thence I thus argue If those phrases a chosen generation a royal Priesthood an holy Nation a peculiar people be applied to Christians as to Jewes in an equal latitude to one as to other then it must needs follow that there is a covenant in Gospel-times in like latitude as in the time of the Law including all that accept the termes of the covenant and visibly appeare as the people of God and is not restrained onely to the Elect regenerate The consequence is evident seeing the termes plainly imply a covenant Here is a covnant-people or no where But these termes a chosen Generation a royal Priesthood an holy Nation a peculiar People are applied to Christians as well as to Jewes to one in as great a latitude as to the other That which God speaks to Israel in the wildernesse that Peter speaks to the Church to which he writes All Israelites in Moses dayes all Christians professing in Peters time had those titles when only those that kept covenant were at any time worthy of them and had the comforts of them Here 't is objected that this Text is meant of the Church as it is invisible and so it follows not that it is spoken by the Apostle in that latitude as it was by Moses to the Israelites but in as great a difference as the Church visible stands from the Church as it is invisible but I would wish that it might be taken into more serious consideration First whether the first Verse of this second Chapter be meant only of invisible members Whether the Apostle perswades Regenerate men and only Regenerate men to lay aside all malice and all guile and hypocrisies and evil speakings Secondly whether the third verse be to be thus limited whether the Apostle makes doubt in that manner whether invisible members had tasted that the Lord is gracious and yet the words in both those verses must needs be understood of the same men and under the same notion as these ver 9. The Apostle brings his speech to no full period till ver 11. Those that must lay aside all malice guile c. and those of whom he makes question whether they had tasted that the Lord were gracious are this chosen Generation this royal Priest-hood Thirdly let us more seriously consider the Apostles farther enlargement of this honour of these Christians Which in times past were not a people of God words borrowed from Hos 1. 10. Hos 2. 23 and spoken of the call of the ten revolted Tribes and in
themselves to the true God and given their name to Christ and do professe him and his Religion whether it be done before God truely and sincerely or only before men so the people of Israel although they were not all truely holy yet they are all called holy so Paul calls all those Saints who had given their names to Christ so Peter 1 Pet. 2 calls all those Christians to whom he writes a holy Nation and a royal Priesthood And Laurentius 1 Pet. 1. 1. page 6. distinguishing of a threefold election 1. To any function civil or ecclesiastical 2. To the external communion of divine worship or the outward Church or people of God 3. To salvation and eternal life brings for proof of the second acceptation Deut. 7. 6. 1 Pet. 2. 9. both which Texts with him there are parallel and taken in the same sense that I understand them Ravanellus in verbum election quotes divers Texts of Scripture in which election is taken for the adoption of any Nation and puts this of 1 Pet. 2. 9. in the last place adding these words And this election is general as hath been said nor are all that are made partakers of it necessarily saved Rom. 9. 6. but respective to this general election he is said to be chosen of God who is called to the participation of his free covenant or a people whom God adopts to himself for a people So also in verbum Sanctus which he sayes is taken three wayes 1. By separation or segregation 2. By imputation 3. By inchoation of holinesse in this life He there gives many instances of the first acception of holinesse by separation distinct from the two other and 1 Pet 2. 9. for one So Salmero as I finde him quoted to my hand understands it of election distinct from that which is to eternal life and calls it an election to faith and all know that they mean no more than their Catholick faith which according to them doth not necessarily entitle to eternal life A Lapide with whom my adversaries in these controversies frequently joyn is also wholly on my part in his Comment on these words so that it needed not to have been said that no approved authour joynes with me Let the Reader judge as the strength of reasons given will perswade CHAP. XXXVIII Arguments evincing the Covenant of Grace in Gospel-times in that latitude as before is asserted THe first Argument shall be borrowed from those titles which undoubtedly and undisputably imply a covenant and yet in Scripture are still attributed to all that professedly accept the termes of the covenant and professedly appear as the people of God Those titles before mentioned by Peter from Moses are confessed to be such that argue a people in covenant and therefore adversaries are so shie to confesse them to belong to visible Professours But titles as high as these and as undeniably implying a covenant are given to visible Professours those then even according to them are on this account in covenant with God And these are all of those titles wherwith the people of God are honoured In New Testament-Scriptures which are especially foure Beleevers Saints Disciples Christians He that is a Beleever a Saint a Disciple a Christian he is a man in covenant with God But all visible Professors that accept the termes of the covenant are Beleevers Saints Disciples Christians so they are still stiled in New Testament-Scriptures Beleevers from the Faith that they professe Saints from the Holinesse to which they stand engaged or from the holy God to whose service they are separated Disciples from the Doctrine which they professe to learne and Christians from him whose they are whom they serve and from whom they expect salvation I know some have inured themselves to that language that those that are thus dignified are necessarily concluded by them to be Elect Regenerate persons It is grown I know the Dialect of the times but not of the Scriptures To begin with Beleevers He is in Scripture a Beleever that is a visible Professour that puts himself into the number of those that expect salvation by Christ Jesus So it is through the History of the Acts where account is given of the Converts made by the Apostles Ministry Acts 4. 4. Many of them which heard the Word believed and the number of the men was about five thousand They that are thus numbred by the poll are visible Professours that outwardly embraced the Doctrine of Faith This might be seene and the names of such taken They are not all Elect regenerate Christians such could not be visibly known The generality of men and women in Samaria beleeved Acts 8. 12. But that they were Elect Regenerate in that universality cannot be conceived Simon Magus is an example to the contrary of whom the Text sayes that he did beleeve vers 13. and yet his heart not right in the sight of God vers 21. He was with those Israelites Psalme 78. 34. in covenant yet his heart was not stedfast in Covenant A great number of the Grecians beleeved upon the preaching of those that were scattered upon the persecution raised about Stephen Acts 11. 21. yet Barnabas whom the Church of Jerusalem sent to them well enough knew that there was no certainty little hopes that all of these were Regenerate persons therefore he exhorts them that with purpose of heart they would cleave to the Lord. He was afraid that the work might be overly and superficial of which the Church in every age hath sad experience he desires and endeavour that they may be rooted and established Only those hearers which are compared to the good ground are Regenerate persons But those compared to bad ground beleeve Luke 8. 13. Regenerate men who alone are invisible Church-Members have their hearts more right with God than to love the praise of men more than the praise of God but many beleevers are thus censured as we see John 12. 42 43. Regenerate persons make no shipwrack of Faith They are borne of incorruptible seed the seed of God abideth in them Yet there are beleevers that thus suffer shipwrack 1 Tim. 1. 19. Myriads of thousand of Jews beleeve Acts 21. 20. yet not all Regenerate The Apostle 1 Cor. 7. satisfies a case of conscience put to him by the Corinthians that if any brother hath a wife that beleeveth not if she be pleased to dwell with him let him not put her away If the beleeving brother here be only a Regenerate man then the unbeleeving wife is an unregenerate woman So the question will be whether a Regenerate sanctified man joyned in marriage to a Professour of the true faith not of those hopes for the truth of sanctification may dwell with her A case that never yet was disputed or doubted The unbeleever is a worshipper of idols one that sacrifices to devils and not to God The Beleever is a Professor of the Faith one in name a Christian and not a Heathen Saint is taken
viz. à duplici modo communionis externo interno Vindication page 4. One and the same Church hath members of a visible and invisible notion a more full explanation may there be seen This being premised I affirm that interest in Church-membership in a visible Church-state is theirs and may be claimed by all those that have interest in the covenant before named an external interest or an interest in the external covenant as usually it hath been called This is a sure rule Where the Covenant is there the Church is and in what latitude soever men are taken into covenant they are received into the Church Lawes tendred by a Prince and received by a people whether they be tendred immediately by himself or by his Heraulds or Embassadours make up the relation of King and people A marriage-covenant tendred by a man as by Abrahams servant in the name of Isaac to Rebecca Gen. 24. and accepted by a Virgin makes up the relation of husband and wife covenant-draughts between man and man for service as an apprentice his indentures make up the relation of Master and servant now the Gospel-covenant is all of these between God and a people where God tenders it and a people receive it there God hath his Spouse his Subjects his Servants These are his people and all of these are Church-members The Word preached and received hath ever been assigned by Orthodox Divines as the characteristical note of a Church of God a Church stands and falls with it where it is professedly received there is a Church-interest Let one man apart receive it as was the case of the Eunuch he forthwith becomes a Church-member and is to have as we see he had his present matriculation and to be admitted by baptism a member not of this or that Congregation but of the Church universal visible and upon this account wheresoever he comes is a Saint a Disciple a Christian a Beleever and so to be received and acknowledged This is abundantly confirmed in those parables of our Saviour Christ of the floore where there is both chaffe and wheat Mat. 3. 12. of the field where there is both wheat and tares of 〈◊〉 draught-net where are fishes good and bad Mat. 13. 24 47. As also in that of the Apostle 2 Tim. 2. 20. In a great house there are not only vessels of gold and of silver but also of wood and of earth and some to honour and some to dishonour The Church is this floore this field this draught-net this great house in which there is chaffe tares fish unfit for use and vessels of dishonour to which may be added the parables of the wedding feast in which there is a mixture of some without a wedding garment Mat. 22. of the sheepfold with kids and goats These parables are brought by Bellarmine for proof that the Church doth not consist only of the elect lib 3. de Eccl. Mil. cap. 7 to which Whitaker Controv secundâ quaest primà cap 7. answers by distinction Bellarmine saith he ought to prove that in the Catholick Church which is the body of Christ there are both good and bad reprobate as well as elect and for proof of this saith he he brings the parable of the floore in which there is wheat and chaffe but by the floore in this place is not meant saith he the Catholick Church but each particular Church in which we confesse there are bad as well as good and for the most part more bad than good And though he makes some exceptions against some of the Parables yet he applies the same answer to others Concerning that of the draw-net he saith The sense of the parable is manifest It happens in the Church when the Gospel is preached as in the sea when the draught-net is cast to take fish 1. All the fishes that are in the sea are not enclosed in the net 2. All are not good that are inclosed but some are unfit for use 3. The bad fish are not separate from the good till the net be drawn to land so when the Gospel is preached all men do not come in all are not good that come and the good and bad are not separate till the end of the world And Doctor Reynolds maintaining that position That the holy Catholick Church which we believe is the whole company of Gods elect and chosen saith The wicked must needs be a part of the Church if the name of Church did signifie the visible Church as we call it consisting of the good and bad Amesius who as we heard judges it very probable that there is no visible Church where the Word is truly preached in which there are not some that are godl◠and therefore is farre from concluding the godlinesse of all saith in his Bellar. Enervatus lib. 2. de Eccles cap. 1. It is false that inward graces are required of us to a mans being in the Church as to the visible state of it see Apollonius Syllog pag. 8. Professores Leyden disput 40. pag. 3. If any man judge it to be absurd that Christ should have wicked men who are limbs of Satan to be of his mystical body carnal wicked men to be members of such a gracious and glorious head Christ is the head of his Church say they if such be Church-members then Christ is their head I shall referre them to a full and satisfying answer to Master Hudsons Vindication page 6 7 8. And for those that deny any being of a Church universal visible as Master Blackwood in his Storme page 65. who saith the objector is overtaken in a grosse absurdity to think there is some universal Church visible begun in Abraham into which upon the rejection of the Jewes the believers among the Gentiles and their seed are to be received for besides the invisible Church the body of Christ mystical there are only particular Churches under the Gospel I would learn of them into what particular Church the Eunuch was received and by baptisme actually and solemnly admitted or whether he was still no Church-member but an alien and stranger to the Common-wealth of Israel not added to the Church To what particular Congregation the Apostles Prophets and Evangelists joyned themselves by covenant and to save farther labour leave them to Master Hudsons Vindication of the essence and unity of the Church Catholick visible which will receive a satisfactory answer when the Sun hath no more being in the Heavens CHAP. XLII A man in Covenant with God and received into the universal Church visible needs no more to give him accesse to and interest in particular visible Churches 2ly IT farther followes that a man by vertue of covenant being thus enrighted to membership in the Church universal visible and baptized into this body there needs no farther covenant to give him accesse to and interest in particular visible Churches What the Apostle gives in charge to the Church at Rome concerning those that are weak in the
concerning grace and works verse 6. to the 11. 2. He speaks to the Gentiles and to take down their insultation over the Jewes he shewes that this rejection of theirs is not final And this as the former is 1. Asserted verse 11. I say then have they stumbled that they should fall viz. irrecoverably fall God forbid 2. Proved by giving account of a twofold end of this rejection of the Jewes 1. The call of the Gentile verse 12. But rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles for to provoke them to jealousie 2. A more glorious returne of the Jews in emulation of the Gentiles verse 12. Now if thâ— fall of them be the riches of the world and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles how much more their fulnesse Hereupon he falls upon a large discourse of his zeal toward them and their re-ingraffing vers 13. 14 15. adding the words of the Text If the first fruits be holy the lump also is holy and if the root be holy so are the branches This Paraâ—us makes a farther Argument for proof that the Jews shall again be called Gomarus makes it an encouragement to the Apostle to endeavour their call howsoever here is a double similitude One drawn from the Ceremonial Law If the first fruits be holy the lump is also holy The other from Nature If the root be holy so are the branches The first is only mentioned the second is largely commented upon In both we see 1. A supposition 2. An affirmation The supposition is of the holinesse of the first fruits the holinesse of the root The affirmation is the whole lump is holy the branches are holy This last is grounded on a principle in nature universally true As is the root so is the branch they are both of one and the same nature As is the one so is the other Which he applies to the state of the Church of God first to the Church of the Jewes and that 1. In their ancient estate when they were a people of God in Covenant-relation holy so stiled of him frequently in Scripture 2. In their present state for a great part broken off and so made no people 3. In their future condition when they should be called of God and as it were risen from the dead Secondly he applies it also to the Gentiles 1. In their ancient estate as no people 2. In their present estate made a people of God in the place of the Jewes 3. In their possible estate and condition to be rejected and cast off On which we may ground several undeniable Positions some concerning the subject root and branch some concerning the predicate holy First concerning the subject root and branch in this place as by way of Metaphor set out the estate of parent and childe ancestor and issue 2. The whole body of the Church is compared to a tree to an Olive tree 3. The root of this tree viz. the first supreme universal root is Abraham Isaac and Jacob. Not Abraham alone so Ishmaelites would be of the body Nor Abraham with Isaac alone so the Edomites from Esau would have been taken in But the Apostle in this chapter from Old Testament-authority excludes both of them Abraham Isaac and Jacob are therefore joyntly the root 4. The branches of this tree are of two sorts â—ome natural issuing from the root by descent others ingraffed put in by way of insition The â—ewes were natural branches descending from the loynes of Abraham Isaac and Jacob. The Gentiles are branches by insition put into the stock the natural branches being broken off 5. The fatnesse of this tree is the glory of Ordinances of which the whole Church partakes or as some say Christ is the fatnesse but that is onely as he is tendered in Ordinances for he walks in the middest of the Golden Candlesticks In which sense onely we may yeeld that Christ is that fatnesse Secondly concerning the predicate Holy There is one and the same holinesse goes through the whole tree all the branches natural and engraffed through the whole Church and all the children of it Jews and Gentiles The whole of this holinesse is from one Original root and therefore one and the same 2. This holinesse is such as is communicable from parent to childe and necessarily communicated as a root communicates sap to the branches This is so plaine that if it be denied all the Apostles dispute falls 3. It is no holinesse of inhesion but relation not qualitative but federal The holinesse of the Jewes who were a holy Nation was such The holinesse of the Gentiles can be no other Holinesse of inhesion is not communicable but only holinesse of relation In holinesse of inhesion the proposition holds not as is the father so is the child who knowes not that holy fathers have unholy children regenerate parents have issue unregenerate These things considered it is evident that as the father is in regard of Church-state Covenant-holinesse so is the childe both in the Church of the Jews and Gentiles The father being without the childe is without the father being within the childe is within eo nomine because a branch of such a root a childe of such a father which is a full confirmation of the point in hand that the childe is in Covenant with the father and the person that actually enters Covenant is not solely vested in it One stands upon the contrary part and puts it to this issue for trial Whether this ingraffing be into the visible Church by profession of Faith or into the invisible by Election and Faith and concludes that it is meant of the Church invisible which if he can make good I shall confesse all Arguments drawn from hence as to this point are lost I would to avoid impertinent cavils and quarrels each Text were brought to such issue I shall in the first place bring arguments to evince that the breaking off and engraffing is respective to the Church as visible and then proceed to answer arguments from a late hand against it 1. That ingraffing which is into Abraham Isaâ—â— and Jacob as a root is not an invisible graffing by saving Faith and Election This is plaine we live not by power received from Abraham Abraham cannot say he bears us up in saving graces and that without sap from him we can do nothing But the ingraffing is into Abraham Isaac and Jacob as a root This argument as is said by one were of force if Abraham were made a root by communication and for prevention he is put to it to tell us of a root communicating nothing but an exemplary root or an exemplary cause of beleeving only what an exemplary non-communicating root is or meanes let the Reader Consider Secondly that ingraffing which caused disputation and contention in some emulation in others upon the sight and report of it was not by saving faith only into the invisible body but open visible and apparant into the
and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost for the promise is unto you and to your children and to all that are a far off even as many as the Lord our God shall call Here I must mind the Reader of that which I have already spoken on this text concerning this text Chap. On which words after a brief Analasis which there may be seen I have grounded this argument They to whom the covenant of promise appertains have right to Baptisme But the covenant of promise belongs to men in a Church-state and condition together with their children therefore those that are in a Church-state and condition have right to Baptisme together with their children My businesse being then to assert the just latitude of the covenant without respect to Baptisme or any other seale I spoke only to the minor proposition that the covenant extends it selfe not alone to men professedly in a Church-state but also to their children with them and to that I think I have there spoke sufficient Now I am put upon the proof of the major That they to whom the covenant of the promise appertaines have right to baptisme If this faile it must be confest that the ground of infant-Baptisme as to this Text falls with it seeing their right is not asserted quâ infants no more than the right of men of growth or men of yeares quâ of growth or in yeares but as they stand in reference to God in coventnt and this is clear in the Text. Be baptized for the promise is to you and to your children Because they are vested in the promise they have their right and interest in the seale If this do not hold the Apostles argument falls to evade this full and cleare argument one is bold to say that in the expounding of these words there are almost as many mistakes as words when words are only brought to convince us of so many mistakes though in a multiplication of exceptions First The Exposition is commonly carried as if the promise there meant were the promise Gen. 17. 7. To Abraham and his seed and this expounded as if it were meant that God would be a God to every Believer and to his seed in respect at least of visible Church-Membership When a promise is mentioned and a seale any man but he will presently understand that promise which is raâ—ified by such a seale For discovery of their mistake that make any other reference of it I shall referre the Reader to what I have said on these words Chap 48. and to Master Cobbets Vindication Part. 1. Chap. 2. Sect. 3. Secondly it is said They expound 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is Acts 2. 39. as if it were a promise of a thing to come some outward priviledg to be conferred on them and their children whereas the chief thing meant in the speech iâ— that as is expressly said by Paul Acts 13. 32 33. Yet no man is quoted for this Exposition of a thing to come but on the contrary quotes Master Cobbet against it It is meant of a present right for as yet they were not broken off from the Olive not Gentiles gâ—â—â—fed in in the instead Thirdly It is said It is taken as if to you were meant of those persons to whom he spake as then Believers and under that formal consideration and then reasons are brought against it I do not interpret it of any present explicite Faith in Christ as the Messiah though now this conviction that so evidently appeared did evidence them to be in an hopeful way and with that Scribe not to be far from the Kingdome of God and therefore he takes his opportunity and presseth it on to come into the way of Believers in Christ Jesus Fourthly It is said your children is expounded of their Infant-children yea it is carried as if of them only To thiâ— is sufficient spoken Chap 48. As for that which follows They would have the promise to be to their children as theirs whether they be called or no which can be verified only in their sense of their infants sith they maintain that even the children of Beleevers are not in covenant the promise is not to them they are not visible Church-members when they come to years of discretion except they be called in their own persons and accept the call Children as theirs whether they be called or no is a contradiction Children are called in their Parents call and we say they are in covenant the Promise is made to them they are visible Church-members till they reject the covenant and deny their Membership this is a calumny Fifthly He sayes Whereas it is urged that when it is said the promise is to all that are afarre off even as many as the Lord our God shall call which is expounded of the Gentiles it is not added to their children To this in the same chapter sufficient is spoken A sixth is the same with the tenth and thither I shall refer the Reader Seventhly It is said And in like manner we hold the command Be babtized every one of you in a covenantâ—sense that is a new devised nonâ—sense such as we have no Dictionary yet to interpret words by be baptized you and your children I am sure here is a non-sense devise to talk of Dictionaries does Calepin or Scapula Rider or Thomasius help us to compare covenant and seale promises and Sacraments Eighthly It is said Some would possesse people with this conceit as if Peters scope were to take away by ver 39. an objection or scruple they would make If we be baptized our selves our children shall be in worse case in respect of the priviledge our children had in the former dispensation of the covenant when they had the sâ—al of the covenant if they be not to be baptized also and that he answers them by assuring them that in this dispensation also their children were in covenant and were to have the seale of the covenant And then addes There is not a word of any such scruple in the Text nor iâ— iâ— likely that they were sollicitous about such an imaginary poor priviledge of their children I am of the same mind that there was no such scruple in their heads This unhappy conceit of casting the seed out of covenant was not then in being though I think the reason given is little to purpose Ninthly He sayes They all do most grossely abuse the meaning of the Apostle in interpreting the inference of the Apostle signified by the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for vers 39. which they would have to be this you have right and warâ—ant to be baptized For the promise is to you and your children as if the illative particle did inferre a warrant or right for them and theirs to be baptized whereas the thing inferred is not any right which in a legal way they might claime but is a plaine motive in a moral way urged to perswade them to be baptized They do grossely abuse their own
and in case it were wholly yielded him whether thence he could draw his conclusion that Ministers in England should not baptize the infants of all that professe the Faith in Christ Jesus He confesseth in this question he hath disadvantage For if a man be looked upon saith he as a visible Saint and reputed a Member of a true Church if that Member be very scandalous and the Church let him alone and not deale with him that person may challenge any Ordinance in the Church both Baptisme and Lords Supper But I conceive such a person is not sufficiently qualified to make a Member of a Church nor ought to be continued a Member of the Church but the Church ought to seek to reforme him or if not to cast him out so that if the Church will let such a person alone and give him these Ordinances there will be guilt charged upon that Church Here is his acknowledgement that they are continued Church-Members though they should not be continued and see what he hath further It is true the wicked Jewes being members of that National Church so long as their Membership held they might challenge circumcision so for wicked persons so long as they continue members and the Church lets them alone they may challenge Baptism and so upon his own grounds they may of right challenge it and Ministers then must needes do wrong in case they deny it and so in all mens judgements the question is concluded in the Affirmative yea should the Church passe to the highest of her censures through all that is allowed to the highest top yet still the person under censure continues in a fundamental right of Membership though debarred of present fruition and so their infants entituled as we have seen to Baptisme His Arguments are worthy of examination in which he concludes such a one is not fit to be a Member First Members of Churches according to the Gospel are Saints visible But such a person as the question mentions is not a visible Saint Ergo. The Minor he proves Such as will say that such a person as the Question mentions is a visible Saint I thinke his eyes are not good He that tells me the Saints which Paul mentions in those places were no other than such a person as is in the Question he must pardon me though I beleeve him not Answ Visible Saint is taken either in regard of Separation for and dedication to God or for real qualifications according to the power of godlinesse in the first sense such are real Saints that he mentions and rejects in which sense we have shewn Saint to be frequently taken and such were most of the Members of the Church of Sardis there being few that had not defiled their garments and many such in the Church of Corinth In the second sense and I know not a third his eyes are better than mine that can determine concerning them Inward graces onely make a real Saint and these to me are invisible if he meanes so far as mens judgements can upon any fair ground conclude that they are such then the Apostles will be involved in our guilt who hand over head admitted members the same day they were converted being in foul sins and never staying time to make judgement of the hopeful truth of their graces Paul calls all those that he persecuted Saints Acts 26. 10. So doth Ananias Acts 9. 13. all those for whom after conversion he ordered and made Collections 1 Cor. 16. 1. And these were some of them as bad as any that in his Epistles he reproves Secondly If a bare profession in Christ be sufficient to make a member of a Church then no person can justly be excommunicated out of a Church for the vilest sins or heresies provided he doth but hold this profession of his faith the consequence is cleare the person is the same which he was when you took him into the Church The consequence is clearely erroneous for he made a profession of his faith and not of sin as we see in Simon Magus Thirdly He that manifestly opposeth Christ in his visible Kingdome is not fit to be a member of a Church But such a person as the question mentions doth manifestly oppose Christ in his visible kingdome Ergo Not fit to passe without censure should have been added but whiles he acts rebellion he professeth subjection and in the Apostles language is a professor Tit. 1. 2. Having thus made way he propounds several Arguments that Ministers by the Gospel are not to baptize the children of such Parents We come now to our Authours arguments First Such persons as de jure ought and de facto are excluded by godly Ministers from the Lords Supper ought also to be excluded from their childrens Baptisme But such persons as the Question mentions de jure ought and de facto are excluded from the Lords Supper Ergo. The Major is proved If Baptisme doth seale to the same covenant which the Lords Supper doth and doth signifie and seale as great blessings and priviledges as the Lords Supper doth then those who are excluded from the Lords Supper ought also to be excluded from theâ—r childrens Baptisme But the Antecedent is true Ergo. The Consequent This is Master Blackwoods argument to keep infants from Baptisme because they are kept from the Supper And if it be of any validity to serve our Authors turn it is of as great force for Master Blackwood Give me leave in Master Blackwoods behalfe to urge it in this manner with the least change of words that is possible If Baptisme doth seal to the same covenant which the Lords Supper doth and doth signifie and seale as great blessings and priviledges as the Lords Supper doth then those that are excluded from the Lords Supper ought also to be excluded from Baptisme But all infants are excluded from the Lords Supper eo nomine because they are infants and therefore they are to be excluded from Baptisme When Master Firmin hath given a faire and full answer to this Syllogisme he may easily fit it to his own to give like satisfaction An infant in covenant may be admitted by that signe and scale in the use of which he is meerely passive and yet be kept back on the account of his infancy from that sign and seale which the Participants must actually improve for their spiritual benefit and consequently a Parent may put a present bar to his actual admission by reason of present guilt to the one when his innocent infant can put no barre to his admission to the other The Parent stands de jure entituled when for the present he may be for his spiritual benefit de facto suspended Another reverend Authour hath made use of this argument from the uniformity of the service of God in general and in particular from the uniformity in the Sacraments to another purpose not to exclude any infants at all who descend from Christian Parents from Baptisme but for admission of
regard of persons for Themselves Posterity For themselves it is much to be able with the Psalmist to say Thou art he that took me out of the wombe Thou didst make me to hope when I was upon my mothers breasts I was cast upon thee from the wombe thou art my God from my mothers belly Psal 22. 9 10. This puts upon confidence in prayer as an argument drawn from long continued acquaintance as there follows Be not farre from me for trouble is neer Ver. 11. Such have timely knowledge of God sucking in somewhat of him while they suck milk from the brests An expression of height setting out this birth-happiness that hath sure more in it then can be applied to sinners of the Gentiles see how the Psalmist yet farther pleads it with God O Lord truely I am thy servant I am thy servant and the son of thy hand-maid Psal 116. 16. an allusion to the law of servants who were the inheritance of the Master in whose house they were Exod. 21. 4. Levit. 25. 16. I am such saith the Psalmist thy servant thy servant with all earnestneâ—â— of affection I am of thine inheritance I am one of those that are thy house-borne-servants my mother was thy hand-maid I have therefore this relation to plead and this he pleads again and again in the same words Psal 86. 16. This great priviledge Isaiah in like manner takes notice of Isa 49. 1. The Lord hath called me from the wombe from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name The Apostle mindes the Ephesians of their former condition and will have them to remember the time past when they were without Christ being aliens from the Common-Wealth of Israel and strangers from the covenants of promise having no hope without God in the world But there never was a time in which men of this birth-priviledge were in that condition these are Gods heritage from the wombe and with Timothy some in greater some in lesse measure from children have the knowledge of the Scriptures if not with John Baptist full of the Holy Ghost from the wombe Luke 1. 15. which yet doubtlesse is the happinesse not of few who are eminent in sanctification whose growth in grace is seen and yet the beginnings not known Howsoever it is with them for personal qualifications yet they are nigh when others are afarre off Ephes 2. 13. at the pools brim waiting the Angels moving of the water John 5. 3. Salvation is of the Jewes saith our Saviour John 4. 22. Saving Ordinances are their inheritance They are happily seated under that joyful sound which is able to save the soul Jam. 1. 21. Salvation is of his house who is the sonne of Abraham Luke 19. 9. As it is full of consolation to Beleevers in respect of themselves so also in reference to their posterity their children are Gods children they being the Lords inheritance their children are his heritage in like manner they bring â—orth children to God and he ownes and challenges their seed as his Ezek 16. 20. An infinite love in God an unspeakable comfort to a perent when the Infant who by corruption of nature is in Satans jawes and in no lesse danger of hell than Moses sometimes was of the water and not so much as sensible of his condition God pleases in this sad state to look upon him and to make it the time of love finding out wayes for his freedome What the Apostle speaks from the Prophet Rom. 10. 10. of Gods care of the Gentiles is certainly true being applied to infants I was found of them that sought me not and made manifest to them that enquired not after me Had we that hopelesse opinion of our children as Papists have of theirs that die without Baptisme what a wretched case were it with David to part with an infant out of the world How could such mourne in any other way than as those that are without hope parting with an infant without any part in Christ and in no better posture towards God than the seed of the sinners of the Gentiles doomed both by the Psalmist and the Prophet Jeremy Psalm 79. 6. Jerem. 10. 25. Pour out thy wrath on the heathen that have not known thee and upon the families that call not upon thy name they might with Rachel weep for their children and refuse to be comforted because for eternity they are not But we finde God more rich in mercy entring covenant with his and their seed Christ himselfe imbracing them in their infancy and taking them into his special love as those that bear his name and though death should prevent their Baptisme whereby they have an actual interest in visible Church-priviledges yet he that hath appointed Ordinances is not tied to them but where he hath entered covenant can save without them Bellarmine confesseth that the desire of Baptisme in one that is in the number of the Catechumoni instructed in the principles of Christ and not baptized doth save though the text John 3. 5. so much urged by that party against the salvation of infants understood with their Comment be in the letter against it why then should not that grace which would shew it selfe in like desires when the person is of capacity qualifie for salvation in like manner Finding this love in God these bowels in Christ we may safely conclude that children have blisse parents have comfort parents and children have their interest in Church-Ordinances and Administrations And let God have the glory FINIS AN ALPHABETICAL Table Relating to the chief Heads handled in this Treatise A Abraham CIrcumcision was not a Seale of Faith peculiar to him pag. 239. Arguments evincing it ibid. All his seed were not in Covenant but his seed by Promise only pag. 298 He was not taken into Covenant as a natural Father but as a natural Father accepting Gods tender pag. 299 His seed is entitled to saving mercies on Gods termes ibid. His houshold-members out of Covenant not circumcised page 425 See Circumcision Root Actions Immanent and transient pag. 132 See Justification Adam Was in Covenant with God pag. 9 His integrity was connatural pag. 103 Stood not in need of a Mediatour p. 91 In what sense imperfect ibid. In case he had stood whether he had been translated out of Paradise into Heaven p. 100 He might have gone quick to Hell if Christ had not been promised p. 102 See Covenant Adoption Adoptive-right to Baptisme questioned p. 454 Angels In Covenant with God p. 7 Needed not a Mediatour p. 91 In what sense their obedience was imperfect ibid. Antiquity For Infant-Baptisme cleared p. 416 Apostasie Total and partial p. 453 Assembly Of Divines vindicated p. 406 Assurance Is to be gathered from the conditions of the Covenant p. 195 See Spirit B. Baptisme SIgnifies not barely dipping but every way of washing It is the door for admission into the Church visible p. 275 Pharisees not denied it seeking but being tendered rejected
it p. 272 Baptisme into particular Church-societies examined p. 461 See Infants Infant-Baptisme Beleevers Vnregenerate persons have the name and outward priviledges of Beleevers p. 249 Berith In the most proper sense signifies a Covenant p. 37 Birth-priviledge Birth-interest in Ancestours-priviledges is of the nature of the things that descend from Parent to Childe p. 401 402 It is so in civil Priviledges in all Kingdomes States Corporations ibid. Vpon this account Protestants are taken up by Jesuites and the Orthodox by Anabaptists in their words p. 403 Birth-interest in Ancestours-priviledges is held up in all other Religions p. 405 God ownes Infants borne in the Church upon account of their birth as his children his servants ibid. Birth-interest being denied parent and childe are heterogeneal p. 406 Children then brought up not in Covenant but for Covenant ibid. According to Scripture-grounds no hope left of their salvation p. 407 Branch What with the Apostle it signifies Rom. 11. 16. p. 325 Branches of two sorts Natural and engraffed ibid. See Root C Canaan GIven to Abrahams natural issue by Promise p. 301 That gift was an appendant to the Covenant p. 303 The promise of it did not denominate the Covenant mixt p. 226 Carnal See Covenant Camero's Assertion of an animal life in Paradise p. 100 His distinction of an absolute and conditional Covenant of the Antecedent and consequent love of God p. 46 47 Children Acts 2. 39. Comprizes Infants p. 322 Not the same with sons and daughters of the Nation vers 17. p. 319 See Promise Christ Is the Mediatour of the Covenant of Grace a fulnesse and fitnesse in him for that work p. 92 A Covenant made of God with him p. 14 This Covenant not the same with the Covenant of Grace made with man ibid. In the assumption of mans nature he did not change the law of nature p. 57 Whole Christ is to be received by Beleevers p. 190 Justification strictly so called seemes to be the fruit of Christs passive righteousnesse p. 123 His active and passive obedience both concurre to mans full happinesse ibid. See Mediatour Christians Vnregenerate persons have the name and outward priviledges of Christians p. 252 Church The distinction into visible and invisible asserted and explained p. 267 See Engraffing Church visible Distinguished into universal and particular p. 269 Universal visible Asserted p. 267 c. It consists of all that make profession of Christian Religion p. 268 Interest in it is of equal latitude with the Covenant p. 267 Church particular A man by Covenant with God interessed in the universal Church visible needs nothing farther for his accesse and interest in particular Churches p. 270 Cohabitation makes not up a Church congregational p. 273 Yet it is necessarily required ibid. A people cohabiting in a vicinity ough to associate in Church-fellowship for Ordinances ibid. Professing Christians in such cohabitation are to be esteemed particular Church-members p. 274 Church-Covenant Explicite or implicite p. 459 Covenant explicite not essential to the relation of a particular Church-member p. 460 Without any Scripture-precedent p. 272 460 Where all is enjoyed for the being of a particular Church much may be wanting for the well-being p. 273 Church pure impure When to be judged pure p. 277 Impure Churches have yet the being of Churches ibid Rome a Church of most impure being ibid. That which especially denominates a Church pure or impure is doctrine p. 278 Doctrines tending to the defilement of Churches are tainted either in the foundation or superstruction ibid. See Errors Parochial Churches Vindicated p. 274 See Place Circumcision A seale of spiritual mercies p. 227 Both a priviledge and a bondage p. 208 Called by the name of Covenant p. 423 It was bottomed on the commandement p. 297 Which command had relation to the Covenant ibid. It was peculiar to Abrahams natural issue p. 301. Cohabitation See Church particular Commands Frequent and full under Moses his administration p. 213 See Law Consent In man of necessity to his being in Covenant with God p. 3. Consequence From Scripture justified p. 416 Conditions Covenant What a Covenant-condition is p. 35 Conditions of the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace on Gods part seem to be the same p. 99 Conditions in the Covenant of Works Were in mans power p. 102 103 Kept man within himself for righteousnesse p. 115 116 Their end was mans preservation 117 Conditions in the Covenant of Grace Covenant of Grace hath it's conditions p. 33 34 Arguments asserting it p. 34 c. Objections answered p. 36 c. These conditions are not performed without special assistance of Grace p. 104 Arguments for special assistance in this work p. 104 105 Objections answered p. 113 c. These conditions carry a man out of himself for righteousnesse p. 116 They are for mans restitution p. 117 A people thus in Covenant must come up to the termes and conditions of the Covenant p. 190 c. No happinesse or assurance but in performance of these conditions p. 195 Objections answered p. 199 Covenant in general Figurative acceptions of the Word p. 2 Requisites in a Covenant p. 3 Mutual contracts of the nature of it p. 38 Distinguished p. 4 Defined p. 5 Covenant between God and Man Reasons why God dealt in a Covenant-way with man p. 6 7 Covenant between God and man defined p. 8 Definition asserted p. 37 38 This Covenant distinguished into Covenant of Works Covenant of Grace p. 8 Covenant of Works and Grace Their agreement p. 86 Their respective differences p. 87 c. Covenant of Works Was entered in mans integrity ibid. Was alone for his preservation p. 88 Did precede the Covenant of Grace ibid. Was a small time in force p. 90 Had no Mediatour p. 91 Covenant of God with Christ Not the same with the Covenant of Grace entered with fallen man p. 14 15 Covenant of Grace Defined p. 159 Distinguished into the Old and New or first and second p. 202 Hath it's solemnities in the highest way p. 5 12 Was entered in mans fallen estate p. 87 Is for mans restitution p. 88 Is in time after the Covenant of Works ibid. Is of everlasting continuance p. 90 Is in and by a Mediatour p. 91 God in this Covenant so manifests his free grace that he still keeps up his Sovereignty p. 53 Old and New or first and second Covenant Their agreement in 6. particul p. 202 c. They are one in substance p. 204 Old Covenant Was administred and held forth by Servants Prophets Priests c. p. 205 It received only the Jewes ibid. It had its date of time and is antiquated for another to succeed p. 206 It was dedicated with the blood of Bulls and Goats ibid. It held forth Christ only in a promise to be incarnate to suffer p. 207 It held all out under types figures and shadowes ibid. Vnder that dispensation knowledge dim those under it in a state of darknesse comparativè to Christians p.