not that is the Church ambiguously so called or that which is Hypocriticall that which hath neyther these nor that is not a Church at all But because the particular Church which hath these markes eyther hath them perfectly or according to parts and againe both wayes according to the quantity and quality diversly eyther more or lesse eyther more purely or more vnpurely Hence it commeth to passe that particular Churches both diversly erre and oftentimes fayle they erre more or lesse according as they either cleaue to the truth or swerue from the same x 1. Cor. 13.9 Rom. 7.23 Mat. 6.12 they fayle partly because they are not alwayes conspicuous in order regiment and continuall succession and partly because sometimes they vtterly perish by Apostasie and corruption y Apoc. 13 4.8 The End of the Church in generall is the glory of God himselfe or the prayse of the glory of his grace but in Particular the end of the Invisible Church is the salvation of the Predestinate and of the visible the consummation fulfilling of the body of Christ out of them that were generally called OF THE CHVRCH The Part Confuting In Defence of the Invisiblenesse of the Catholicke Church against Bellarmine cap. 12. Lib. 3. THE DISTINCTIONS I. THe Church is two wayes vsually considered eyther according to the outward matter and forme thereof or according to that which concerneth the whole or vniversall and inwarde forme thereof In the former sence it is called visible but in the latter invisible even the Scripture it selfe granting or condiscending herevnto which for this end calleth the Catholicke church the church of the first borne who are written in heaven the body of Christ not naturall but mysticall the Spouse all whose glory is inward II. THe reasoning is of no validity which is drawne from the particular church to the catholicke or Vniversall because those things pertaine not to every singular part which yet are most truely spoken of the whole in generall and indivisibly Now these are particular churches whereof there is mention made Numb 20.3 King 8. Act. 20 Act 15. ver 3. 4. Act. 18. 1. Cor. 15. Gal. 1. Phil. 3. III. THe conclusion is inconsequent from the catholicke church to a Particular for neyther doe all the conditions or properties of the whole church fitte to every part therof eyther alwaies or altogether and those two propositions Mat. 16. 1. Tim. 3. are to bee vnderstood of the catholicke and invisible church as all the circumstances thereof doe evidently proue For the foundation of the church cannot bee sayde to be visible or sensible whether you vnderstand Peter according to the confession of the Adversary for it cannot bee seene or Christ for hee is the mysticall head of a mysticall body or the confession of faith for faith is onely to be perceyved by the vnderstanding Neyther treateth hee of the Church over which Timothie was chiefe in respect of the visiblenesse therof but so farre forth as it was a parte of the catholicke invisible Church and did only comprehend those which were in very deed of the houshold IIII. THe name of Church is termed properly or Figuratiuely by the exposition or opposition of the two entire parts of the Church which are the Pastors and the Flocke For properly and absolutely it signifieth the vniversall body but oppositely this or that parte of the Church but in the place cited Mat 18. it is taken oppositely for the Rulers of the Church themselues who commonly are called the Church representatiue V. THe Argument which is not grounded vpon the authority of Scripture but vpon the bad exposition of Augustine concludeth nothing Now the proper translation and natural sense of these wordes In them hee layde a tabernacle for the Sunne is that God placed Tent in the Heavens or a certaine glorious seate for the Sunne VI. ESay 2. Dan. 2. Mich. 4 Mat. 5. Ans There is no good proceeding from the Figuratiue formes of speaking by which the dignity majesty of Christs kingdome or of the Catholicke church is set foorth to the visiblenesse of the same For eyther all that Majesty of the church as it is catholicke is inwarde or if it bee outward it belongeth not to the church as it is catholicke but in regard of the diverse and particular circumstances of place time and persons Of Place because that may be true a Secundū quid after a sort or in part concerning particular churches which absolutely and simply cannot bee spoken of the Catholicke Of the Time because the maner and fashion or outward appearance of the same is divers For the church is at one time more conspicuous then at another but it was most conspicuous at the time of the first preaching of the Gospell Lastly of the Persons because of the outwarde concourse of men eyther good or bad which Augustine against the Donatists proveth to haue beene in his time most populous VII Two times onely doe not make the vniversality of the church but all times from the beginning of the world to the end of the same Neyther could the church of the ancient people either be knowne by circumcision or were the gifts of the holy Spirit visible in the new Testament Not the one for al they which were of the circumcision did not pertaine to the catholicke church Not the other because the grace of the goly Spirite is not to be perceyved by the outward sence VIII THe church is called so aequivocally either simply absolutly or after a sort as touching some particular limitation of the same the church absolutely so called comprehendeth the Angels but after a sort so called either comprehendeth the whole vniversality of men in heaven and in earth and so the Soules of the dead or onely that vniversalitie of men which is on the earth The Society of these as they are elect is mysticall and spirituall and therefore not well compared to politicke or civill societies neyther doth the outward societie of the sacraments whereof Augustine speaketh cause any man to bee a member of the catholicke Church but of a particular Church onely IX THere is no consequence eyther frō an aequivocation or from the vnlike manner of the church the aequivocation is in the word Church which signifieth eyther the catholicke church Invisible or Visible Now the manner of the Iewish and Popish Church is vnlike because God commanded the form of the one but of the Popish church not at all and they that were partakers with that Church did partake in holy things and such as pertayned to the condition of that church and not in all things promiscuously or confusedly X. THere is one necessity absolute another conditionall the necessity absolute is that if wee will bee saved we adjoyne our selues to the catholicke church out of which there is no salvation but the necessity conditionall is that wee adjoyne our selues to this or that particular church for there is a twofold condition the one
same consideration altogether is of Durance as is of Antiquity sith both is referred to the time and the one comprehendeth the other in it selfe Now those thinges which are spoken of the church are true as touching the common body of the church but false as touching the church particularly or of the Romish church IIII. THe multitude pertaines not to the Church alwayes nor to it alone nor altogether Not alwayes because in a little Flocke Christ hath his Church Not to it alone because it is a common State even to the Synagogues of Sathan which in multitude far exceedes the true Church Not altogether because though many be called yet few are chosen V. THere is one Succession of doctrine another of person that is principall this is secondarie The former is Coincident with the true and essentiall markes of the Church The latter cannot be knowne partly because it is particular for by the Confession of the adversaries it belongeth to the Church of Rome onely partly because it is accidentall according to the condition of the Persons Things and Places VI. THe Agreement in Doctrine with the ancient Church is spoken ambiguously for there is one with the Church Apostolicall and another with the Church of some former ages or with the Church of Rome the former wee acknowledge the latter wee deny because the purer Church knew not of it it disagreeth with the Scriptures and is common with Heretikes VII THere is one Vnion mysticall and spirituall by the bond of faith another outward by the bond of profession that is coincident with the true Marke of the Church this cannot be a Marke partly because it pertains not to the Church alone for there is also a certaine vnion and fellowshippe of the wicked partly because it pertaines not alwayes for oftentimes dissentions arise in particular Churches VIII THe Holinesse of doctrine is eyther of the Apostolike doctrine properly or of the Traditions and Constitutions of Popes ambiguously The first way it is coincident with the true and essentiall marke of the Church the latter way it can by no meanes bee knowne because it is vncertaine and mutable IX THe Efficacy of doctrine is twofold the one saving and proper to the Elect the other belongeth generally to al them that are called and is in many degrees different Yet neyther of thē is a marke of the Church not the one because it is inward not the other because it is divers X. THe holinesse of the life of the Authors or first Fathers is referred eyther to the Patriarkes Prophets Apostles or to other Doctors the Institutors of Religious Orders as concerning the first Order such true Holinesse is onely of the Elect and therfore cannot be a Marke of this or that particular Church as concerning the other in those Doctors and Institutors of Religious orders superstition indeed is acknowledged but Holinesse is not knowne XI THe glory of Myracles sith it hath reference to the Doctrine and not to the Church is properly to bee tearmed the markes of that and not of this Now it is a marke Accidentall for it is not alwayes convenient Particular for it is not conveniēt for every church Lastly not Proper because it is alike cōmon to truth and falshood XII THe Word Prophesie is ambiguous For eyther it generally signifyeth the gift of Interpretation and vnderstanding of the Scriptures or specially the gift of foretelling In the first signification whereof also the place of Ioel is to bee vnderstood Prophesying is coincident with the true and essentiall note of the Church For it hath the nature of a miracle and cannot be a Marke because it is an extraordinary gift in the Church XIII THe confession of the Adversaries is also an obscure Marke and vncertaine neyther alwayes true Again that which is from the light of nature onely hath rather the shadow and the Image of the truth then the truth it selfe XIIII XV. A Conjecture which is taken from eyther prosperity or adversity is vncertaine neyther doe particular examples make a generall rule because as temporall felicity doth not alwaies accompany the church but the crosse of Christ so an vnhappy end doth not alwayes follow the enemies of the Church That the Visible Church may faile against Bellarmine Lib. 3. Cap. 13. I. IT is one thing to treat of the Church as touching the Essence but another thing of the Church as touching the outward and visible manner and forme thereof onely The Church according to the Essence thereof cannot fayle at all but as touching the outward and visible manner of the same it may faile not that it is in it selfe invisible but that it cannot be seene and perceyv◠of men Now the places Mat 18. 1. Tim. 3. treate of the church in the first sense and not in the second Further the church is called the Pillar of the truth not by a a ratione architectonica sed forensi a maner of speech borrowed from the Art of Master-builders but from the Lawyers and Pleaders namely because the church hath the Truth as it were hanged vnto it II. THe Places Mat. vltimo Eph. 4. Psal 47. Esa 61. which contain an open promise without the name of the church doe eyther treat of all the faithfull and elect onely or of the perpetuall vse of the Ministery necessary in the Church or of the perpetuall glory and felicity of the catholicke church or lastly of the propagation increase and blessing of the Angelicall church for the covenants sake III. THe Parables which are cited doe shew that the church indeed as touching it selfe is visible which wee doe not deny but they proue not the necessity of that glorious conspicuity whereof we are in controversie IIII. THe Eternity of Christs kingdome whereof mention is Psal 88. Dan. 2 Luc. 1. pertayneth not to the outward glory and forme of the church neyther is the maner of Christs Kingdom the same as are the kingdomes of the world V. THe Testimonies of the Fathers haue eyther different and vnlike examples as that of Augustine and Lyrinensis or proue not the cause because they doe but after a sort testifie that the church cannot at all perish as that of Bernard VI. TO treate of the visible Church so generally called and of this or that particular church are two thinges most different Againe the church is called Invisible two wayes eyther in it selfe or in the eyes of the world and of the enemies of the Church it selfe The End of the Second Booke THE THIRD BOOKE CONCERning the Second Part of DIVINITIE and first of MAN and his diverse Estate in this Life and after this Life CHAP. I. HAving ended the first and Principall part of Divinity which is concerning the Causes of our Salvation so concerning the Workes of God Now by order wee are to come to the second which is concerning the subject of the same that is of Man and of his diverse estate The whole Knowledge of Man as far forth as the
Sacramentall Trope For as Christ sayed This is my Body when he gaue but the signe of his body so our bodies are sayed to bee cherished nourished and fed with the body and bloud of Christ when in very deede they are nourished with those thinges which are the Signes of the body and bloud of Christ VI. THe Fathers who spake of the Adoration of Christs flesh treated not of that which was done in the mystery but in the celebration of the mystery for that flesh hypostatically vnited to the eternall Son of God is rightly adored of vs as oft as the Supper of the Lord is celebrated VII THe Fathers who required of Communicants a feare trembling and faith did not put any essentiall change of the thing signified into the signes but they required a certain feare least the signes for their vilenes should be contēned but faith they required that that thing which is not seene might yet be beleeved and by faith receyved VIII THe Fathers who affirmed that a myracle was wrought in the Eucharist vnderstood no miraculous Trāsubstantiation of the bread into the body of Christ but the majesty of this mystery which they compared with the greatest miracles and by a Catachresis called it a miracle because by a wonderfull and incomprehensible manner God worketh in the hearts of the godly as oft as by a true faith they celebrate this mystery Of the Presence of Christ in the Supper against Bellarmine Lib. 1. Cap. 1. I. FIgures are eyther so called oppositely as they are opposed to the body as also shadowes to the Image or Relatiuely as in generall they figure signifie some thing else besides that which is seene In the first signification the Figures of the olde Testament are not opposed to the sacraments of the New but to the fulfilling of those things which were prefigured in the second signification the Figures or Sacraments of the old Testament are badly opposed to the Sacraments of the New Testament whether as touching their quality or as touching their excellency Because albeit by the word of Institution they agree in the generall partes the Relation and the end yet they differ in the measure vertue and easinesse of signification In which respect the Sacraments of the New Testament are saide to bee more excellent then the Sacraments of the Olde Testament II. AGainst Bellarmine cap. 5. 6. The Sermon which treateth only of the matter of the Sacrament and the communion thereof and not of the Signe as the very sence of the place the Interpretation of Christ the Analogy of Faith doe most evidently proue cannot proue the reall presence of Christs body vnder the formes or kindes of the Signes for the Spirituall eating is to be distinguished from the Sacramental because that is internall and invisible this externall and visible and though it bee granted that in that place there is speech made of the Sacramentall eating yet the foure arguments which are from thence drawne cannot proue that presence Not the First because the bread Synecdochically is taken for meat and the meat Figuratiuely for the flesh of Christ Wherefore in the place cited the bread is not the Subject but the predicate of the flesh Not the Second because Christ by correcting reproved and by reproving corrected the Capernaits and his Disciples as verse 61.62.63 doe evidently shew Not the third because the wordes of eating and drinking are taken Figuratiuely and as the Text declareth they are of the same force with these maners of speaking to belieue in Christ and to abide in Christ Not the Fourth because Christ confirmeth his censure before going shewing that then they shal consider their error when they shall see the sonne of man ascending III. THe Arguments which in cap. 9.10 are taken from the words of the Institution are aboue confuted in the distinctions of the Efficient cause IIII. THe three arguments which are drawne out of the 10 chapter of the former to the Corinthians haue no consequence not the first because it is a fallacy of that which is not the cause as the cause For the blessing or consecration is not the cause of the Sacramentall conjunction of the thing signified with the Signe but the Institution onely and the divine ordinance declared and confirmed by the blessing Not the Second for the breaking which is properly sayde to bee of the bread is improperly and Figuratiuely spoken of the Body Not the Third because the word Communion signifieth an Vnion ioyning together in fellowshippe properly of our persons with the person of Christ beeing indeed that same which is spirituall supernaturall if you respect the manner yet reall and true if you respect the bound and object thereof V. LIb. 1. cap. 13. The argument which is taken out of the 11. chapter of the former Epistle to the Corinthians concludeth nothing because the apostle treateth not of the eating of his body but of the outward receyving of the bread and wine which indeede with the former is conjoyned in the lawfull vse thereof but in the vnlawfull vse of them that communicate vnworthily is alone and yet maketh the communicant guilty of the body and bloud of Christ because the vnworthy taking and handling of the signes redoundeth vnto the reproach of the thing signified VI. THe Testimonies of the Fathers which are alleadged throughout the whole Second Booke we haue aboue answered VII LIb. 3. cap. 3. The profes which are alleadged from the omnipotency of God doe inferre no corporall presence of Christ in the Supper Not the First because the omnipotency of God excludeth both things contrary to his nature and things contradictory and not to be able to doe those things is not a point of weakenesse but of infinite power and constancy Not the Second because his first apparition was heavēly which nothing furthereth the presence of Christ on earth The second was in the night which appeared not to the eyes but to the minde Not the Third because the Fathers treated eyther of the presence of Christ as touching his person as Chrysostome or of the Sacramentall presence of his body in the Supper as Ambrose or of the effect of the eating of his body as Cyrill and Theophilact or lastly they spake Hyperbolically as Augustine Not the Fourth because to reason from the divine nature to the humane and from the one part of man which is spirituall to the other which is corporall is even proportionally inconsequent Not the Fift because it is one thing to treate of the mysteries which goe beyond Nature but another thing of the miracles which overthrow nature Not the Sixt because of those things which are equally vnited the one cannot be any where else where the other is not or may not be and to attribute to Christ two bodies equally vnited were a monstrous thing VIII CAp. 6. Lib. 3. The proofes which are taken from the illocality of the body are false The First because the consequence is of no validity from a
and Charity but properly eyther the action it selfe conjoyned with the holy ceremonies or the things which are offered II. SAcrifices some are Typicall or Signifying other some not Typical or signified and both eyther Pacifying or Propitiatory or else Eucharisticall or of Thanksgiving III. THe word Leholam with the Hebrewes importeth not the Infinitenesse of time but the continuance of the same sometimes longer sometimes shorter according to the subject matter IIII. THe Sacrifice of Christ is considered eyther properly or q Symbolice comparatiuely Properly It is one onely in verity and efficacy even that Sacrifice of Christs body on the crosse comparatiuely with the olde Doctors of the church the Eucharist was sometimes called a Sacrifice V. THe Oblation of Christ is one onely not onely in speciall kind but also in number for there can bee no oblation of Christ but by his comming betweene and therefore that distinction of Sacrifice into a bloudy and vnbloody is false In Defence of his Kingly OFFICE THe Kingdome of Christ is taken eyther Figuratiuely or Properly Figuratiuely then both Instrumentally for the Gospell and subjectiuely for the church properly for that Oeconomicall dominion of Christ which is called the Kingdom of Grace for the beginning thereof in this world and the kingdome of glory for the consummation thereof in the other In Defence of the State of Christs Humiliation I. THere is one Subiection naturall another Oeconomicall and by this latter Equality is not destroyed because the thing equall as Cyril sayeth is sayde to be subiect to the equall by way of dispensation II. OBedience is not an Act naturall of nature but voluntary of the person according to both natures Now the consequence is of no force from one speciall kind vnto the other from the Act of Nature to the Act of Will In Defence of his Exaltation I. THe maiesty of the Essence of the Word is one and of the dispensation another II. DIspensation comprehendeth two things one the mystery of the vnion the other the end of the mystery In respect of the vnion Maiesty hath properly respect vnto the nature assumed in respect of the end it fitly agreeeth with Christ according to both natures III. EXaltation is not the abolishing of â—ature but the perfection and all other power given to Christ is of Office and not of divine Essence OF THE CALLING OF MAN vnto Salvation The Part Confirming CHAP. VIII FOr asmuch as wee haue treated of the Beginning and Dispensation of our Redemption that is of the Person and Office of Christ Wee now are to treate according to our appointed order of the Application therof Now the verity of this Application ought three wayes severally to bee marked by the degrees thereof by the outward meanes and by the Subject the degrees according to which God in time applyeth vnto vs the benefite of Redemption are chiefly two Vocation and Iustification Vocation is the first degree of Application on Gods behalfe called therfore by Augustine The entry vnto salvation and the first passage towardes the end Of this Vocation there is vsually had a divers knowledge according as it is distinguished eyther as touching the manner of calling into an Inward and outward or as touching the divers condition of the cause Efficient into a Generall and Particular or Lastly as touching the effect of calling vnto an Effectuall and not Effectuall Vocation Now of this Vocation whether Inward Particular and Effectuall or outward generall and ineffectuall there is a double respect the one Absolute in it selfe the other Ioynt or conjoyned in an ordinary vocation For God calleth outwardly in generall inwardly in particular and joyntly both wayes ordinarily Of both we are orderly to treate according to the course of the causes The outward and generall Vocation that wee may speake of it in the first place is a gracious action of God wherby he calleth men forth by word signe and worke from vnbeliefe vnto faith that both the faithfull might bee disposed to the communion of salvation and that others being coÌ„vinced of the grace offered vnto them by God might become inexcusable The cause Efficient of this Vocation is God because it is from him properly if you marke the true beginning therof and is from him first or chiefly by himselfe and principally if you haue a respect vnto the meanes which God would haue to be vsed eyther extraordinarily or ordinarily for the calling of men The beginning is that loue of God towards man wherby as a lover of soules and the Saviour of Men a Sap. 11.27 1 Tim. 4.10 hee beareth his good will towardes all men and generally offereth his Grace vnto them Now hee offereth the same that wee may in few wordes speake of the means by word by signes and by workes all which in respect of God that ordayneth them are generall by word eyther extraordinary such as was in the first times of the Church b Numb 12.8 Heb. 1.2 or Ordinary by the vniversall Canon of faith and life which wee call the Scripture c Ephes 2.17 Rom. 10.14 by signs by which added vnto the word the Lord being author his grace is visibly sealed vp d Rom. 4.11 Gen. 17.11 by works eyther Ordinary or Extraordinary eyther within the Church or without the Church The matter or Subiect of this vocation are all men without difference of nations sexes or states vnto whome by name the meanes whereof we haue spoken doe extend For God wil haue all men to bee saved both generally because hee calleth forth out of all whomsoever hee will or e Ex singulis generum genera singulorum out of every one of the generall sorts the generall sortes of every one vnto salvation as also because the grace of God is offered vnto all not by the vniversall efficacy of Christ but by a generall signe and power f Mat. 22.14 1. Tim. 2.4 The Forme is that outward Vocation which God mediately effecteth by the ministery of his word by the vse of the Sacraments and lastly by the communion of the Church and the members thereof in themselues and among themselues all which are â—ceyved by the outward senses g Heb. 4.12 The End is two-fold Proper both the inexcusablenes of the Reprobates and the salvation of the Elect Remote the manifestation of the Grace of God h 1. Cor. 15.28 And this is the outward and generall calling The Internall and particular calling is a gracious action of God whereby the elect from everlasting in their due time according to the good pleasure of God for the merite of Christ by the holy Ghost are inwardly informed vnto the receyving and communion of Gods grace for their owne salvation the glory of Gods mercy The Efficient cause of this Vocation â—s God according to the particular beginning and the ordinary means therof The beginning is the saving grace of God for Christ for two things doe distinguish this particular beginning of inward calling from
cited out of Acts 19. proue the same power of both Baptismes because they are the words of Paul speaking of them who were baptized by Iohn in the name of the Lord. The Second Place is of Marke the last ver 16. Answ It is there declared not why but who should bee saved and withall it is taught what is the Consequent of Baptisme and Faith The Third is of Iohn 3.5 Ans The name of Water is Equivocall For in the Scripture it is vsually taken in a three-fold signification for eyther specially it signifieth Baptisme or the the outward Legall washing or lastly the very Effect of the holy Ghost in vs. If it bee taken in the first signification the sense is that Baptisme is the ordinary Signe of Regeneration in the Church If in the second the sense is that the outward clensings of the Law doe not profite vnlesse the inwarde purging of the Spirite bee added thereto If in the third the Name of the Spirite is added d Exegetice by way of exposition for that the Efficacy of the outward Sacramentall Baptisme dependeth vpon the Spirite The Fourth is Act. 2. Answere To be baptized for the Remission of sinnes properly noteth not the Effect of Baptisme but the end and scope thereof neyther was the Action ordained to signifie the signe but the signe to signifie the action signified The Fift Act. 8. Answere The Particle By signifieth sometimes Efficiency sometimes the Instrument and sometime the Signe And in this place it is taken Symbolically because the gift of the holy Ghost by the laying on of hands is both signified and sealed The Sixt is the 1. Cor. 10. Answ To partake of one Bread is not a cause but a publicke Testimony that wee are of one Body wherevpon it is called one Bread not in number but by the common notion of a Sacrament to wit representing vnto vs that one mysticall body of Christ The Seventh is Eph. 1. Answ by a Metonymy that which is proper to the thing signified is attributed to the signe because Baptisme is the signe of our Consecration indeed effectuall not by it owne power but of him who being one became all things to vs the faithfull The Eight is the 1. of Pet. Answ Salvation is attributed to Baptisme because it is the visible Instrument of Salvation both by the signifying and sealing Adde further that Baptisme as a Counter-paterne is opposed against the deliverance from the deluge not in respect of Efficacy but of the Consequent or the thing signified Neyther is there a difference properly put betweene the Baptisme of the Iewes and ours but betweene the outward and inward Baptisme for asmuch as the Effect of this is Salvation and Peace of conscience Distinctions in Defence of the END Bellarmine proveth by fiue Arguments that the sealing of Grace and Gods promises is not the End of a Sacrament 2. Cap. 14. Lib. 1. De Sacramento I. THe end of the Sealing of the Sacrament is not eyther that wee may bee taught what are Gods promises which the word teacheth or that wee should more belieue the Sacraments then the promises for the Sacraments are for the promises and not the Promises for the Sacraments but that the truth of Gods promises might bee confirmed and sealed II. THe Essence and nature of Sacraments ought to be gathered partly from the words of the Institutor partly from the properties of a Sacrament that the wordes of the Institutor do include a promise it hath beene aboue sayde that the property of a Sacrament is to signifie and seale the thing promised the Nature of every Relation and the vse of all signes doe evidently proue III. THe vse of divine Testimonies dependeth vpon the will of the Institutor whether they bee Signes or workes which being Subordinate neyther ought nor may bee opposed both are effectuall and haue their vse neyther doth the abuse of the Signes in Hypocrites take away the vse of them but such is the nature of things opposite doth more establish the same in the godly IIII. THe sealing of Gods promises hath respect eyther vnto the Faith of the covenant or vnto the Faith of them that are in the Covenant In Infants the sealing of Gods promise is made properly in respect of the Faith of the Covenant but in them that are of ripe yeares in respect of their faith in the Covenant V. THe end of Sacraments hath respect eyther vnto the Institutor or vnto him that vseth the same the end of the Institutor is that Sacramentes should seale but of the vsers eyther that they vse that sealing according to the will of the Institutor to their owne Salvation or that they abuse them to their owne condemnation Which last end being accidentall taketh not away the proper end whether Principall or Secondary OF BAPTISME The Part Confirming CHAP. XII THe Doctrine in speciall concerning the two Sacraments of the New Testament to wit Baptisme and the Lords Supper is next after added vnto the Doctrine touching the Sacraments already expounded in Generall The word Baptisme according to the manner of the true interpretation thereof doth Generally signifie any washing whatsoever especially the Legall and Iewish clensings and purgings or purifying which is done by water but Particularly it is taken eyther Metaphorically for the Crosse and Martyrdome a Mat. 10.38 which they call The Baptisme of bloud or Synecdochically for the pouring out of Gods visible Gifts wherewith the Apostles were furnished b Act. 15. which they call The Baptisme of c Flaminis Inspiration or most properly for the first Sacrament of the New Testament which they tearme the Baptisme of d Fluminis Water in which last signification it is of vs here taken and defined To wit that it is the first Sacrament of the New Covenant instituted by Christ consisting of things Analogicall to wit the Signe and the thing signified as also of the Analogicall relation of themselues betweene themselues together with their action or working by which they which are in the Covenant are washed with water by the Minister of the Church that being ingraffed into Christ they might bee made partakers of the inward washing of the soule by his bloude and spirite The Efficient Cause of Baptisme may bee considered two wayes eyther as the Cause Instituting or as the cause vsing Baptism instituted or the baptizing After the first manner Christ onely by his holy spirit ought to be called accounted the Author of Baptisme in asmuch as who first instituted Baptisme in the person of Iohn the Baptist whose Baptisme Christ himselfe witnessed not to bee of men but of God and from heaven e Ioh. 1.23 31. and afterwardes confirmed the Baptisme of Iohn instituted with the word of commaundement promise f Mat. 28.19 For albeit as touching the Circumstance and manner of Christs manifestation there was some difference betweene the Baptisme of Iohn and of the Apostles yet in kinde it was one and
affection or relation to that calling And according as one part of this Invisible church doth warfare on earth and the other triumphantly in heaven so the manner of the forme hereof is diverse for in the triumphant church it is perfect in it owne kinde but in the Militant it is onely inchoatiuely or by way of beginning tending to perfection by more or lesse efficacy acording to the measure of the spirit faith And hence it is that in respect of this forme the state of the Invisible church is divers For as it is vnited to Christ her head it cannot erre because there is but one truth of the heade the spirit the body but as it is considered according to it selfe and the diverse members thereof it erreth in divers wayes and degrees k 1. Cor. 13.9 1. Cor. 3.12 Apoc. 3.1 for albeit the Spirite bee alwayes in it yet the same worketh not perfectly by it but onely according to that measure which it hath l 1. Cor. 12 7.11 but this invisible church cannot revolt frō her God because it hath God that promiseth a Mediator that redeemeth and saveth and lastly giftes that cannot bee repented of m Mat. 16 18. Ep. 4.1.29 The Forme of the Church visible the one is Constitutiue which ordayneth the Church the other Distinctiue that distinguisheth the true church from the false The Forme which maketh the visible Church is that outward calling which God mediately effecteth according to that holy kinde of government which hee would haue to bee kept in his house To this calling three thinges are as hand-maids the word of the Gospell the vse of the Sacramenrs and the lawfull communion of Saintes for God calleth outwardly by Worde Signe and Worke whereof wee haue more at large spoken in the place concerning the calling of men vnto Salvation The Forme that distinguisheth and maketh difference of the true Visible Church from the false is that which certaine markes doe limit and point out Now wee call them Markes by which the thinges which come into question are certainely knowne whether they bee to bee perceyved by sense or by vnderstanding or both wayes And as there is wont to bee of every thing a double knowledge the one which noteth out the Essence of the same by the true and immediate causes the other fette from the Accidents and affections declaring the vnseparable dispositions of the same or the other outward accidents which onely overcover the thing so also two sortes of markes are agreeable to this double knowledge for some are effectuall and necessary markes which they call Signes infallible and other some accidentall which they tearme Probable These former are the proper tokens of the church which certainely shew the Essence and nature of the same the latter are but common and probable signes thereof The proper and essentiall note of the visible church belonging to the Essence thereof immediately and properly and next of all flowing from the forme of the same is onely one to wit the truth of Gods word revealed and communicated wherevnto the truth of the Sacramentes as a thing inseparably tyed or knit with it is conjoyned n Heb. 4.12 Ioh. 10.27 Mat 28 10 Rom. 4.11 for the truth of both is so proper and so essentiall a token of the church that this truth and the church are alike changed The accidentall markes are two-folde for some are fet from those naturall dispositions of the Church which are inseparable which are also the naturall dispositions of that first marke to wit The pure preaching of the Word and the lawfull administration of the Sacraments o Ioh. 5 39. Act. 17 11 Mat. 26.26 1. Cor. 10 17. which are the two necessary and proper Adjuncts and Attributes of the church other some doe properlie pertaine to the order in the Church eyther publicke or private Such as are Ecclesiasticall power and publicke and private exercises of godlinesse and charity p Mat. 3.3 28.20 1 Tim. 2.1 The Power Ecclesiasticall is three-fold of Ministery of Order and of Ecclesiasticall Discipline The Power of the Ministery is an authority and right in the church to teach not every thing but that onely which the Lord hath prescribed by his Prophets and Apostles q Gal. 1.8 1. Tim. 6.3 and is the first part of the keies The Power of Order is an authoritie of the Church which is imployed partly about doctrine and partly about constitutions and lawes for the outwarde policie of the Church the one is commonly tearmed Doctrinall or Prescriptiue the other Constitutiue or Ordinate The Ecclesiasticall Discipline is a judiciall power of the Church whereby men receyved into the family of Christ are directed to godlinesse and are restrained least they should commit any thing vnbeseeming their christian profession but the offenders are reproved rebuked and corrected And this is the latter part of the keyes distinct from the former because that properly belongeth to the office of teaching but this is most of all practised in the correcting of mens offences and in the exercising of Ecclesiasticall Iudgements r Mat. 16.19 Ioh. 19.23 Mat. 18.18 1 Cor. 8.11 And according as there are two sorts of slippes to bee corrected some concerning doctrine and some others concerning manners so about both these Ecclesiasticall judgement is occupied for the private good of the offender and the publicke good of the Church Now there are three degrees of of that judgement rebuking conjoyned with admonishment Secondly an Excluding suspending or with holding from the Lords Supper whereby for a time the offender is forbidden or barred from the participation of the Supper Thirdly Excommunication whereby after a lawfull knowledge had before hand some person for his malitious contumacy is excluded from the communion of Saintes or as the Apostle speaketh is delivered vppe to Sathan to the destruction of the flesh that the Spirite might be saved ſ Mat. 18 18. 1. Cor 5.4 c. The publicke exercises of godlines and charity which notifie the true Church t Act. 2.42 1 Tim. 2.1 1. Cor. 1.2 are a gathering for the poore the Ministery the receyving of the word and sacrament Prayer u Ioh. 13.35 singing of Psalms c. but the private which indeede make for the ordering of our life are the exercises of repentance and those which respect our neighbour are the exercises of charity as Almes c. And of all those markes there is a common vse outward shew of them for the most part in all Churches but the right of possession and the lawfull vse of them is proper and particular to the true Church onely Whence judgement ought to bee given concerning the purity or impurity the cleanenesse or obscurity of the visible Church For that church which hath that Essentiall marke and all those which are accidentall is the purest that which hath that onely and not all these is the true Church but imperfect that which hath some of these and
if we know which is the true church the other if by meanes of the times wee can adjoyne our selues to the same XI FRom a false definition layed down a false proofe is drawne and therefore both the Antecedent and Consequent of the Argument is denyed XII THe Testimonies of the Fathers which are cited doe eyther treate of the inward forme of the Church as that of Origen and Cyprian or of the Eternity of the Church and not of the Visibility therof as that of Chrysostome or lastly of the Particular Churches of some certaine time as that of Augustine In Defence of the matter of the Church and first that they which are not baptized and the Catechized or novices belong to the Catholicke church Against Bellarmine Lib. 3. Cap. 5. I. COr 5. It is one thing to treate of the not baptized by reason of their vnbeliefe and another of the not baptized because of their vncapablenes eyther of age or profession of faith and to be without and not to be baptized are things different for as they are sometimes without which are baptised so on the contrary they are sometimes within which are not baptized II. ACT. 2. there is a two-fold adding to the church the one according to the judgement of the truth and the inward nature of Christianity the other according to the judgement of charity which is beleeved to be because of the outwarde communion of the Signes that is proper to the Church invisible but this to the church visible and of this but not of that doth the place treat III. THe Body of the Church and Baptisme are so called ambiguously for the body is eyther outward or mysticall and spirituall Baptisme likewise is eyther outward or inward eyther of water or of bloud all which are baptized with water are of the outward body of the Church but all those which are baptized with the bloud of Christ are of the mysticall and spirituall body of the Church IIII THe Catechized or Novices with the Fathers are two wayes distinguished the one according to the opinion of the common people for they were not numbred amoÌ„g the Christians who might not seeme to belieue albeit they beleeved The other according to the forme of the Church To which because they pertain not properly they are thought not to bee of the Church though they bee the members of the Church invisible V. THe respect of right is one and of the fact is another he hath right to the Sacraments which hath faith Now by Fact none are admitted to the outward communion of the sacraments but those which professe faith Secondly that those which are excommunicated belong to the Church Invisible against Bellarmin Lib. 3. Cap. 6. OF Persons Excommunicate there are two sorts for some are justly excommunicated and some vnjustly those which are justly excommunicated are cast foorth out of the particular churches but not simply out of the catholicke Church For Excommunication is a censure not of the catholicke church but of the particular they which are vnjustly are neyther cast out of the visible church by right nor out of the invisible by right or fact Now the Testimonies of the Scriptures or of the Fathers which are alleadged doe eyther treate of those which are iustly excommunicated or of the Excommunication of particular Churches whereof there is no question Thirdly that the predestinate alone pertaine to the Invisible Church against Bellarmine Lib. 3. Cap. 7. I. TO be in the Particular church and to be of the catholicke church are thinges different the one is for a man to adjoyne himselfe to that outward society of the faithfull but the other to bee as a member ingraffed and conjoyned vnto Christ Wherefore also these are two thinges different namely to be cast out of the particular church and to be cast out of the catholicke church That is done by Excommunication but this by no means can ever â—e done Now the places which are cited Mat. 3. Mat. 15. Mat. 25. 1. Cor. 5. 2. Tim. 2. are true concerning the particalar outward churches and not concerning the Catholicke Adde further that the Argumentes drawne from Parables are of small waight beyond the meaning of the Holy Ghost II. A Man is sayde to be of the church two wayes eyther according to Gods Election or Predestination or according to the outward Temporall calling the one way every faithfull man is a member of the catholicke church even from everlasting the other way no man is indeed to be a member of the visible church vnlesse he bee called in time Paul then was of the catholicke church even when he was not of the visible church before his calling but Iudas was not of the catholicke church though hee was of the visible church as touching his outward calling III. PRedestination is two wayes to bee considered eyther abstractly or absolutely as it comprehendeth that decree of God from eternity or compositiuely and Relatiuely as it comprehendeth all the meanes which are necessary for the execution of that decree as Vocation Iustification c. After the first manner every Person Predestinate is called a member of the catholicke church after the latter maner no man is called a member of the visible church but as hee is called Iustified c. IIII. THe Respect of brethren and of the church is not the same For they are called brethren which are eyther joyned together in an outwarde society and profession of faith or who haue the same Right of adoption with vs. Those are knowne these are not In like manner the Church is considered eyther as Catholicke or Particular the Predestinate are called the members of the Catholicke church and not of the Particular generally Of the FORME of the Church first of the Markes thereof against Bellarmine Lib. 4. Cap. 4. to the End of the booke I. THe manner of reasoning from Names is inconsequent For according as the things are certaine so Names which are of Imposition are accidentall voluntary and therefore vncertaine Neyther can that bee a marke of the Church whereby the true may bee discerned from the false which eyther cannot be seene because of the vniversality it selfe which is only to be perceyved by the vnderstanding or is commonly vsed according to that which is spokeÌ„ of others who liue without the Churches II. ANtiquity as beeing a thing accidentall separable common by sense not perceiuable cannot bee a Marke of the Church It is a thing accidentall because it maketh not the Essence of the Church but happeneth therevnto because of the processe of time It is a thing separable because without this the Church was somtimes knowne both the old church in the time of Adam and the churches of the New Testament in the time of Christ and of the Apostles It is a thing common because a lye or heare-say haue also their antiquity It is a thing by sense not perceiuable because antiquity it selfe can be discerned by the vnderstanding and reason onely III. THe