Catholike but properly and rightly it is not so Also there may be a Catholike visible Church that is all the particular parts of the visible Church beeing considered in one common Notion in the minde But it is most truly and properly affirmed of the inuisible Church for that is the Catholike Church which is holy and Apostolike which in the true sense containes onely those that are truly sanctified and built on the foundation of the Apostles doctrine Thus you see what Church to repute Catholike namely that which is generall scattered and dispersed ouer all the world and not any particular Church much lesse may any one particular man be called properly Catholike And therefore it is a vaine brag of the Papists to say that their Church is Catholike It is a particular Church For first it is not generally dispersed ouer all the world and besides there was a time when there were other Christian Churches at Ierusalem and Antioch c. before euer their Church was and therefore there was a time when theirs was not Catholike and so not Catholike now because that which is Catholike is one and the same at all times I say not in one place but those that professe the same true faith that others did are still the Catholike Church A Priest of their owne hath well answered them that so long as they were gouerned by generall Councels they might bee called Catholikes But now seeing they are gouerned by one man namely the Pope it is fitter that they be called of him Papists And so much for the second Vse Vse 3 The third Vse As this teacheth vs what Church to repute Catholike so likewise it teacheth vs what faith is to be reputed Catholike not that which one onely Church doth embrace But then you will say there is but a little Catholike faith there is scarce any one Point Catholike for in what one Point of Religion haue all the faithfull agreed I answer first Yes euery fundamentall Point was alwayes held by al the faithul els they were not faithful if they were cut off from the foundation so that howsoeuer in smaller matters as of Ceremonies and circumstances and such like some differences and some errors were betwixt those that were faithfull yet in the maine substance there was none at all Secondly I say all times are not alike for the meanes and occasions of knowledge of some fundamentall Points in that cleerenesse as they should bee knowne the light of saluation breaking out euery day more cleerely then other Therefore it is sufficient if they all beleeued the same things that we doe so farre as they did and might attaine to the knowledge of them or if they were ignorant of some yet it is sufficient that they followed the rest and did not oppose against that which they knew not but did renounce and repent of their ignorance and this their very repentance of their ignorance is an acknowledgement of such Truths as they were ignorant of By this it appeares plainely that the faith of the Church of Rome is not Catholike because none of those Points wherein they differ from vs haue been vniuersally held no nor spoken by the faithfull as Purgatory Inuocation of Saints Transubstantiation Iustification by workes worshipping of Images and such like But they will say If our faith be not Catholike Obiect then yours is much lesse Catholike being gainsaid generally by the Church for many hundred yeeres I answer First Answ it is gainsaid indeed by many that professed themselues to be of the Church but those that were truly of the Church of Christ held and maintained that in effect which wee doe as we can instance in many particulars of euery Age. For the fiâ—st three hundred yeeres after Christ wee can proue the Church held the same faith which we doe now And sixe hundred yeeres after Christ when Popery got the vpper hand yet still wee had some that held the same faith from time to time and it was gainsaid by whom Not by those that were truly faithfull but by those that made dissensions in the Church But if this will not satisfie them then let this controuersie be decided by that other adiunct in the Nicen Creede where it is called Catholike and Apostolike for that alone is truly Catholike which is also Apostolike and then it is cleere on our side For if the Apostles beleeued and taught as we doe as we haue and can plainely proue then our faith is Catholike and whatsoeuer Church or Persons since them haue not so taught and beleeued must not bee held Catholike nor Apostolike nor yet their faith and Doctrine Therefore our faith being Apostolike must needs be truly Catholike and howsoeuer though none had beleeued since the Apostles dayes yet we holding the fame faith with them wee must needs haue the true Catholike faith Indeed this is a reason to flesh and blood which they make when they say Where was your Church so many hundred yeeres We answer Wee euer had a Church for we euer had some that opposed them and their courses and stood for the maintenance of this faith which we professe But if neuer any since the Apostles dayes had stood for this faith which we professe yet we say and can proue that the Apostles beleeued and taught the same that we beleeue and teach therefore our faith is truly Catholike and Apostolike And therefore as the Apostles were saued by this faith so shall wee and then what matter is it if all the world had opposed it Vse 4 The fourth Vse This requires thankfulnesse in vs that being Gentiles and so in darknesse the Lord hath vouchsafed vs this light and respited vs to those times of the Gospell wherein the Church is made Catholâ—ke Now wee come to the fourth Point that is That the Church is a Communion of Saints whereby two things are affirmed first that the Church that is the faithfull hath a Communion with Christ secondly that they haue a Communion one with another both which wee may see in the. 1. Iohn 1.3 that yee also may haue fellowship with vs and that our fellowship may be also with the Father and with his Sonne Iesus Christ And Rom. 12.5 So we being many are one body in Christ and euery one one anothers members First of the Communion the faithfull haue with Christ their Head which is the fourth Point We wil draw it into an obseruation and that is this namely Doctr. That all the faithfull the whole Church and euery member thereof haue a ioynt and mutuall communion with Iesus Christ he and we are brethren Heb. 2.11 It is a ioynt communion because all together doe participate therein and it is mutuall because all the faithfull partake in it in Christ and Christ with euery one of them The proofes of the Point are these 1. Cor. 1.9 God is faithfull by whom yee are called vnto the fellowship of his Sonne Iesus Christ our Lord. 1. Ioh. 1.3 That yee
a difference betwixt one and the same Church in one respect and betwixt the same Church in another respect We considered of it as it was distinguished in three respects First in respect of the bounds and compasse of it and so we shewed that there was a generall and a particular Church Of the generall we had before spoken of the particular we were hereafter to speake when wee come to speake of the visible Church Secondly it was considered in respect of the seuerall portions and states allotted to vs and that was twofold the first in this world which is a fight or warfare the second is in the world to come which is a Crowne or Triumph In the first respect the Church is called the Church Militant In the second the Church Triumphant of this we spake the last time Now we are to speake of the diuision of the Church in the third respect And that is in respect of the outward state of it in this world and so it is visible and sometime seene vnto the world and inuisible sometime not seene to the world The Church of God doth sometime attaine to such a flourishing prosperous estate in this world as that first her members are many in number secondly they haue an outward forme of setled Gouernment thirdly their Religion is countenanced at least not violently opposed by the State and Authority where they liue Fourthly they make open profession of their faith and Religion Fiftly they haue publike and solemne Assemblies at ordinary and seasonable times and in due and conuenient place where the Ministers teach the Word and where the people heare the Word preached and where the Sacraments are administred and Discipline executed at least in some measure and that without danger and without prohibition I say the Church doth oft-times attaine to this state euen in this world and then it is called visible On the other side sometimes it is brought to such a low and distressed estate that scarce any of these are found there but rather all quite contrary First their number is small secondly they haue no such outward forme of gouernment setled amongst them at least not so exercised as that thereby the world should take notice of them that they are such a holy Society thirdly they and their Religion is distasted disgraced derided hated and persecuted euen to the very death Fourthly their profession is secret Fiftly their assemblies and meetings for Religious exercises are seldome or none at all or at least very priuate at such vncertaine times and in such priuy and close places as they can light vpon and that are best and fittest for their owne safety Lastly they are depriued and debarred of the publike vse of the ministry of the word and of the Sacraments and discipline And in this case it is called an Inuisible Church So you see in generall how the state stands between the Church visible and inuisible Now we are to speake of them in particular First of the Church inuisible The Church of God is said to be inuisible in these fiue Senses First it is inuisible because it is not seene nor acknowledged by the men of the world neither is it possibly to be discerned by the sense of the naturall man but whosoeuer sees it and knows it to be the Church of God must haue a better light then that of nature Secondly it is inuisible in respect of the inward graces it is endued withall as their Election Faith c. for these are not visible at all and so it is inuisible euen then when it is most visible Thirdly it is inuisible in this sense because the greatest and chiefest part of it is in heauen and so not to be seene by mans eye Fourthly the Church is inuisible in this respect because that Congregation that professe themselues to be the true Church of God are indeed sometimes no better then the very Synagogue of Satan such as ouerthrow the foundation and persecute that which is the true Church of God indeede and so vpon Tryall proues a false Church and so makes the true Church inuisible not to bee seene of men whiles the false Church intertaines mens eyes and thoughts doting vpon her deluding them and blearing and dazelling their sight they cannot nor do not looke after any other and so the right and true Church lies hidden from their sight euen as the painted Harlot carries away mens eyes from beholding the modest Spouse So while men dote vpon the painted shewes of a false Church they cannot behold the true Lastly the Church is inuisible in this sense because though there bee some true professours yet there is no publike profession at all or else it is very secret so that there is no certaine outward Testimonies whereby it may bee knowne to be the true Church In these fiue respects the Church may bee said to bee inuisible Marke this well for herein stands the difference betwixt vs and the Papists The Church say they must be so notoriously visible that there must be a great number of them and they must make open profession of their Faith and must carry themselues so as that euery man and woman may know that they are the Church and that euery one may know which is the true Church whereunto hee is to ioyne himselfe Opposite to this we say the Church is sometimes inuisible in these respects before set downe So howsoeuer there may bee alwaies a Church yet it cannot bee alwaies so notoriously knowne to all the world Further we must consider that the Church doth somtime signifie the vniuersall Company of Gods chosen in heauen and in earth sometime onely the Company of Beleeuers on earth When it signifies the vniuersall Company of Gods chosen in heauen and earth in this sense it is simply inuisible and that both actually that is it is not seene and also potentially that is it cannot be seene as in the first second and third senses we haue shewed For first neither can the naturall man see them nor secondly can their graces be seene neither thirdly can the greatest and chiefest part of them be seene being already in heauen Secondly when the Church signifies the company of Beleeuers on earth it is inuisible either simply or after a sort simply and so there is no Church on earth inuisible but in the first and second senses onely or else after a sort that is as opposed to famous visiblenesse generally pretended by the Papists namely that there is a great multitude alwaies openly professing the true Religion and that in such outward shew state and carriage that it is or may bee generally knowne to bee the true Church and that any faithfull man may point with his finger to such a Congregation and say boldly This is the true Church and so may see and know which is that holy Society amongst men where he may safely and where he must ioine himself for his saluation And in this sense that
is as opposite to the Popish Church the true Church is sometimes though not alwayes inuisible which is partly in the Fourth and Fifth senses aboue specified So that the Church euen then when it is after a sort inuisible is also after a sort visible too that is it is inuisible because it is not easie and plaine to be discerned and visible because it is discerned by some though hardly and so consequently those Papists that make the visiblenes of the Church to be somtimes such that it can hardly be knowne agree with vs in the thing directly though they differ in the phrase and manner of Speech Now I will giue you some generall aduertisements here concerning the Church inuisible and visible whereby you may the better conceiue and vnderstand the whole busines first you must know that the Church inuisible is the whole company of Gods chosen in heauen and earth whether they be called or to be called whether they doe professe the Truth or whether they doe not yet professe it for Gods chosen which are not yet called nor doe not yet professe the truth are of the inuisible Church too as I haue heretofore shewed Secondly the vniuersall visible Church is the whole company of knowne professors on earth The differences betwixt the vniuersall inuisible Church and the vniuersall visible Church are these following 1. The inuisible conteines all good Wheate without chaffe 1. The visible conteines good and bad Wheate and chaffe together 2. The inuisible is partly in heauen 2. The visible onely on earth 3. The inuisible is of all times and places from the beginning to the end of the world 3. The visible is onely of certaine times and places asunder 4. The inuisible hath many sheepe belonging to it that are not yet brought into the fold 4. The visible hath many within the fold that professe to bee sheepe yet indeed are Wolues 5. Against the inuisible the Gates of hell shall neuer preuaile 5. Against the visible they may and doe preuaile in a sore measure sometimes vtterly rooting it out in some particular places as we see in the Churches of Ephesus and the second and third Chapter of the Reuelation They may preuaile against the visible Church to the horrible defiling and destroying of them But so they cannot do against the inuisible Church for that is out of their Reach The second aduertisement is this That the inuisible Church on earth is the whole Company of Gods chosen liuing in the world whether professing or not professing the truth whereof though some parts bee visible that is such as make open profession yet all cannot be seene Or more particularly it is a company of faithfull or professors for this being partly visible may haue Hipocrites in it euen whole hundreds that make profession of sauing faith yet so secretly either by reason of the fewnesse of their number or feare of persecution or the timorousnesse of their nature that they can hardly be discerned to be such So that one and the same Church may be visible and inuisible at once visible as making some profession that may be and is seene to some and yet inuisible too as not making that open profession that publike notice may be taken of it yea one and the same man may be a member of the Church visible and of the Church inuisible at once of the visible as his profession being partly seene and of the inuisible that is of the vniuersall Church as his Election faith and other inward graces are not seene The third aduertisment is that those that are of the Church both visible and inuisible are therefore saued not so much because they are of the visible Church for then all of that Church should be saued which is not so but because they are of the inuisible Church too for there is none of that that is of the inuisible vniuersall Church but are and shal be saued So likewise a man may bee no member either of the visible or inuisible and yet hee is not damned because he is not of the visible but because he is not of the inuisible vniuersall Church The fourth Aduertisement is this How we are to vnderstand some things that are affirmed of the Church in the Scripture for it is spoken of in diuers senses in the Scripture as first some things are affirmed of the visible Church onely which cannot be vnderstood of the inuisible as that in Matth. 13.47 48. where the Kingdome of heauen that is the visible Church is compared to a Net which gathereth both good and bad fish for the inuisible vniuersall Church containing onely the Elect hath no bad fishes in it Againe some things are affirmed of the inuisible Church onely which cannot be affirmed of the visible Church as that in Cant. 4.7 Thou art all faire my Loue and there is no spot in thee No visible Church but hath many spots therefore this is to be vnderstood of the inuisible onely And so likewise that which I haue spoken of heretofore that they are knowne onely to God and themselues is to bee vnderstood of the inuisible Church onely Againe some things of both and that in many respects First some things which are principally spoken of the visible Church are abusiuely applied to the inuisible vniuersall Church the whole taking denomination of the greater part as Matth. 8.12 The children of the kingdome shall be cast out This is spoken principally of the visible Church of the Iewes that should be cast off and yet is applied abusiuely to the inuisible to the children of the Kingdome whereas none of them can be cast off but shall certainely bee saued So Reuel 3.1 4. in the first Verse the Lord saith to the Church of Sardy Thou hast a name that thou liuest but art dead Here is a dead Church yet in the fourth Verse the Lord saith Thou hast a few names in Sardy which haue not defiled their garments c. Here is a liuing Church how is this to bee vnderstood This is spoken principally of the visible Church that it is a dead Church but is abusiuely applyed to the inuisible Church which was amongst them the whole taking denomination of the greater part And Rom. 10.21 compared with Rom. 11.1 In the tenth Chapter and last verse Israel is said to be a disobedient and gainsaying people In the eleuenth Chapter and first Verse they are said to bee Gods people which is to be vnderstood as the place before Some things are principally affirm'd of the inuisible Church but analogically are applyed to the visible Church as the whole taking denomination from the better part As for example If I come into the Barne and see a heape of Corne among the chaffe I may say truly It is a heape of Corne though the most of it be chaffe naming it from the better part And in this sense when the visible Church receiueth her denomination from the better part the Church may bee called the Body of Christ
them for then wee must goe out of the World as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 5.10 howsoeuer some heretikes as the Donatists haue maintained that the visible Church consists onely of the elect and chosen and some of our Diuines haue vsed the same words but the heretikes meant it in one sense and our Diuines in another The heretikes intend it as they speak it and so it is not true but our Diuines meane it principally of the Church inuisible and so it is true that none but Gods chosen are members thereof and when they doe apply it to the visible Church they vnderstand it of the liuing abiding and fruitfull members of the Church and so it is true too that none are liuing members of the visible Church but the chosen but yet there may be rotten and dead members too Secondly this teacheth vs what to esteeme of such as Vse 2 make profession to be of the Church and yet their liues are not answerable to their profession shall wee say presently they are none of the Church Certainely wee must iudge of them as members at least by possession and for ought wee know they may bee members by right too It is very hard and impossible for man to iudge who is an hypocrite and who not because that though hypocrites may discerne themselues by notorious falls yet the faithfull sometimes fall as dangerously as they and therefore wee must leaue that to God who onely knowes the heart in the meane time we may safely say that they are members by possession and for ought we know by right too This is harsh in many mens eares but yet the Doctrine is true and sound and the exceptions against it are easily answered The first exception is this How can these bee members of the true visible Church and yet are not members at all of the Catholike Church I answer Yes they are of the Church to vs both because they seeme so and in charity wee are to hold them so till we see the contrary Yea but doth not the Apostle say 1 Ioh. 2.19 They went out from vs because they were not of vs. I answer this is spoken of them after their falling away but yet while they abode with them they were members by possession though not by right and it is confest of the Apostles that Iudas had obtained fellowship with them and was numbred amongst them besides visible is additum diminuens that is it addeth not to the thing but diminisheth from the strict acceptation so that the wicked reprobates and castawayes may be of the true visible Church though not of the true Church simply The second exception is this How can they bee the members of the Church the body of Christ seeing they haue not Christ to be their Head for Christ is the Head of no Reprobate I answer Yes they are members of that body whereof Christ is the Head though simply he is neither Head to them nor they members to him but he is the Head properly of the faithfull in that body and therefore proportionably he is reckoned the Head of the whole Besides the wicked pretend and counterfeite themselues to bee the members of Christ but Christ neuer pretends and counterfeites himselfe to bee their head and therefore though head and members bee relatiues yet it is so that they may be members of him in their sense and yet he no way pretending to bee their head Lastly hee is their head in that sense that they are his members that is in the shew of the world and in their owne pretence though not in his The third exception But how then is the visible Church the Kingdome of heauen for so it is called many times in the Scripture I answer First it is said so in respect of the faithfull that are in it secondly it is said so because there is the meanes to bring all euen the wicked to heauen thirdly they doe all outwardly professe to be Citizens of heauen and are so to be reputed till there be euident proofe to the contrary and then they are to be cast out Fourth exception But what if all bee hypocrites is that a true visible Church I answer It is impossible for where the Word is truly preached it cannot bee but that there are some that doe sincerely professe Secondly I say that if it were possible yet till it be discerned to be so it is to be held a true visible Church The fifth exception Yea but you confesse your selfe that though they be members yet they are not liuing but dead members and will any man say that a dead member is a member of a liuing body I answer Yes euen as a rotten branch of a tree till it be cut off is a member of the tree as well as the soundest In Reuel 3.1 the case is auouched in this very kinde the Church of Sardis is said to be a dead Church because it had dead members and yet it was a true visible Church And so they may be members by possession and by shew though they bee dead members and so by right are not members for that belongeth onely to the faithfull Thirdly this teacheth vs that we should not be rash to Vse 3 condemne a Church for to be a false Church or no Church because it hath in it many hypocrites and wicked members for you see that true visible Churches haue alwaies hypocrites in them It is true that a Church full of hypocrites may bee called and doth well deserue to bee accounted a corrupt and an vnsound Church yea but so long as there are some it and of it that do openly professe the sauing faith in sincerity though otherwise it be full of wicked men and hypocrites it cannot bee denied to be a Church yea a true visible Church though there be a thousand hypocrites to one true Beleeuer This matter concernes vs neerely for it is one of the maine Reasons alleaged by Browne and Barrow and Greeneway and the rest of the separation to proue vs to bee a false Church Oh say they your Church is a profane multitude promiscuously mingled together of good and bad all were admitted together into the Church and so you continue in it without separation I answer If it were so this might proue vs to be an impure and corrupt Church but not a false Church so long as wee haue the Word and Sacraments openly embraced and obeyed by some amongst vs wee are still a true Church though wee should bee in a miserable and fearefull estate because the wicked if they were not rooted out would bee likely at length to ouerthrow the Church But secondly wee answer It is not so For first for admission we receiue none into our Church that are professedly wicked for our baptisme is administred to none but vpon solemne protestation and promise of the profession of the sauing faith and obedience to the same Now because they are receiued into our Church being young therefore this promise
535. Vogel 751. Thirdly of those which are in heauen and earth both together The matter of this reduced to sixe Heads all raised out of the Article of the Creed I beleeue the holy Catholike Church First Head It is but one The Church hath a threefold onenesse Difference of circumstances doe not cut off from the true Church as First of states Secondly of times Thirdly of persons Fourthly of place Fifthly of ceremonies Sixtly of iudgement in Points not absolutely fundamentall Second Head The Church is holy John 3. The third Head It is Catholike First how this word Catholike hath been wronged First by those in the Romish Church three wayes Rhemists in Act. 11 and Bristow in his moâ—es and demands 2. Cor. 3.5 Secondly it is wronged by some foure wayes Secondly the word Catholike righted in regard whereof three things are to be considered of First the antiquitie of it Vid Fulke ibidem Morney de ecclesia p. 13. 14. c. 19. ad 25. 29. vid. Rainold conclus 650. 671 Secondly the right meaning of it Oecumenius a Ipsa est ecclesia catholica vnde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 graece appellatur quae per totum arbem terrarum diffunditur Aug. epist 170. ad Seuerinum Rhemists in 1. Ioh. 2.6 Morney de ecclesia 23. Thirdly the common receiued vse of the word Vniuersalis ecclesia est Ierusalem ciuitas Dei viui quae continet ecclesiam primitiarum circumscriptâ—m in coelis Isychius in Leuit. lib 4. cap. 14 Catholica veraciter illa est quae ab omnibus perfidis eorum successoribus consortibus sincera pura immaculata communione diuisa est Gelasius ad Anast Aug. Euseb hist eccl applieth Catholike both to the whole Church through ehe world and to particular Churches too Vid. Field lib. 1. p. 16. 26. l. 2. 56. Thirdly the obseruations from it Sheldon Quod semper quod vbique quod ab omnibus Vincent lib. 3. 24. Obiect Fourth point That the Church is a communion of Saints whereby two things are affirmed First that the Church hath a communion with or is ioyned to Christ which is the fourth quality First Christs communion with vs in two particulars First in regard of our selues in foure respects Secondly he communicates with vs in respect of the things that belong to vs which consisteth in these things Secondly wee communicate with him First in regard of himselfe hee is ours two wayes Secondly we communicate with him in regard of all thâ— things that are his as First what he had Secondly what he did Thirdly what he suffered Fourthly what he hath obtained by his doings and sufferings How these things are to be vnderstood This communication with Christ in the things that are his drawne into two heads First in some things by merit Secondly in other things by power Reasons on Gods part First his election Secondly his couenant Thirdly his free gift of Christ to vs. Fourthly his Loue. Reason on Christs part Reasons on our part First our faith Secondly our couenant Thirdly by gifts Fourthly our loue Fifthly our necessity Three meanes of this communion First the Spirit Secondly the Word Thirdly the Sacraments A Christians Patent Royall vnder the broad Seale of heauen for his interest First in God Secondly in the promises Thirdly in the offices and benefits of Christ. Fourthly in full and finall glorification A Christians acquittance generall against all pleading of sinne and euery thing that is against vs. The second thing affirmed concerning the communion of Saints and that is the communion which the Saints haue one with another and this is the fifth quality Caluin instit lib. 4. cap. 5 1. 2. Morney de eccles pag. 8. Christ the light of the World Three things concerning this communion First what it is it is spirituall In how many senses it is spirituall Two things wherein this communion consisteth and that in two things First a communion of state and that in diuers respects Secondly this communion consisteth in a communion of practise And this is first generall Secondly it is particular And this diuers wayes First in regard of gifts Non tollitur gratiarum diversitas nec conuellitur ordo politicus Calu. Secondly in regard of their wants and that diuers wayes Thirdly this communion of practise in particular is in respect of their doings Fourthly in respect of their sufferings Fifthly in respect of their affections Sixthly in respect of themselues and all they haue Thirdly the extent of this communion Cautions herein to be obserued This communion extends to the Saints in heauen The Reasons are of fiue sorts first in respect of God The second sort of reasons in respect of Christ The third reason in respect of the Spirit Fourth sort of reasons are in regard of the faithfull them selues in diuers respects Fifrh sort of reasons are in regard of our aduersaries Things to be done that we may maintaine this communion Trials whether we practise this communion Teaching two things First knowne to God prooued Secondly to themselues Thirdly none but God and themselues know it The fourth generall Head in this question which is the diuision of the Church which is partly of the name partly of the thing it selfe First of the name Secondly of the thing it selfe Three wayes how the Church is distinguished Into vniuersall or particular Secondly it is distinguished into the Church Militant and Triumphant What the Militant Church is defined This warfare is spirituall in three respects That the good Angels are parties of this Church Militant in some sense though noâ— parts of it What the Church Triumphant is Eight differences betweene the Church Triumphant and Militant And in it fiue things What to be considered of fâ—r the fitting helping and directing of vs in this warfare A third diuision of the Church into visible and inuisible Of the Church inuisible and of the inuisibilitie of it in fiue senses The Church signifying the vniuersall company of Gods chosen in heauen and earth in this sense it is inuisible actually and potentially Secondly the Church signifying the company of beleeuers in earth is inuisible simply or after a sort Generall aduertisements concerning the Church inuisible and visible Differences betweene the vniuersall inuisible and the vniuersall visible Church Vid. Zanch. in Hos 2.8.9 p. 51. August in Ps 10 Hierom. cont Lucif Exceptions of Papists out of the fifth of Matthew for the visibilitie of the Church answered The second exception out of Mat. 18.17 The third exception out of Rom. 10.10 Nine things considerable in a visible Church First the definition of it Vera ecclesia est quae profitetur Christi fidem Bellar. de ecclâ—s milit p. 249. First some Churches are either vniuersall visible Churches or particular visible Churches First Particular visible Churches are first Nationall Parochiall or domesticall Jnstances first of a Prouinciall Church Secondly of a Parochiall Church Thirdly of a Domesticall Church Secondly they are either more or lesse visible Thirdly
this as a generall ground that the onely way whereby we are to find out the true Religion is by the true visible Church which may be true in some sense but not in this And their reach herein is to make all the Christian World to suspend thēselues vpon their Church as that being alwayes visible and so to receiue that Religion and none but that which their Church doth teach For say they there is no way to find out the true Religion but by the true visible Church but ours is the true visible Church therefore if euer you will find out the true Religion you must find it out by our Church It is not to be denied but that a true visible Church is a good meanes to find out the true Religion being assisted with the continuall presence of Gods Spirit and being furnished with the Word and Sacraments and gifts for that purpose but whereas they say it is the onely way it is not true for the Scripture hath another way and a better Ioh 5.39 Search the Scriptures saith our Sauiour for they testifie of mee Againe if this be the onely way to find out the true Religion by the Church then a man must first be well assured which is the true Church before hee can safely relie vpon her iudgement for the truth of Religion so that whereas before his care was to find out the true Religion and thereupon resolues to search it out from the true Church now his first and greatest care is to find out which is the true Church for other companies that are not may and doe bragge oft-times that they are the true Church when there is no such matter what are wee to doe in this case This Doctrine tells vs directly what is to be done where is it that the sauing truth is professed There and no where else is a true visible Church so that whereas they say the Church is the onely way for the finding out of the true Religion it is plaine as we haue shewed that the true Religion professed is the onely way or at least the chiefe way to find out a true visible Church The case is this we say the true Religion shewes forth the true Church the Papists say the contrary that the true Church shewes forth the true Religion And this that they say is true in some sense but that which we say is true in a better sense for the true Religion shewes the true Church as the cause shewes the effects but the Church shewes the true Religion as the effects shew the cause As for example the Sunne-shine is the cause of the day and the day proues that the Sunne shines Now one man may reason thus from the cause to the effect and say The Sunne shines therefore it is day another from the effect to the cause It is day therefore the Sunne shines and both say true but the first is the more forcible kind of reasoning when we reason from the cause to the effects So when I reason thus Here is the true Religion therefore the true Church here I reason from the cause to the effects and this is a more forcible and better reason then to say Here is the true Church therefore here is the true Religion which is but to reason from the effect to the cause This wee shall find to be true in the Scripture phrase where the Church is compared to a Candlesticke now what serues that for but onely to hold out the light then the sauing truth is the Light or Candle now the Candlesticke is not seene at all without the Light of the Candle in the dark night though it were of gold so in the darknes of this World the Church which is the Candlesticke if it hold not forth the sauing truth which is the Light or Candle it cannot be seene it selfe So that it is the truth of Religion that makes a true Church and the profession of this truth makes it visible then the Church is not the only way to find out the true Religion nor yet the best way but the best and safest way to find out the true visible Church is to find it out by the true Religion which they professe And so much for the reproofe of the Papists Vse 2 The second Vse is for triall Is it so that euery Congregation openly professing the sauing truth of God is a true visible Church then here is the straitest and precisest Rule to measure the being of a true visible Church by the definition containing all true visible Churches and no more Therefore look wheresoeuer the true sauing faith is profest there is a true visible Church And looke where there is a true visible Church there true sauing faith is profest for these hold in reciprocall termes so that whether wee would proue any assembly to bee a true visible Church or reproue and conuince any for a false we must lay it to this Rule so whether they professe the sauing truth of Christ or not and accordingly esteeme and iudge of them to bee true or false Churches Here certaine exceptions may bee made to this Doctrine The first exception is this What doe you say that a company professing the sauing truth makes a true visible Church Will profession onely make a true visible Church I answer No First it is required Answ that the sauing truth be amongst them indeed else they are no true Church Secondly that being amongst them it is not to bee smothered but profest Thirdly that it bee not onely outwardly profest but inwardly imbraced too at least by some of them Rom. 10.10 The second exception is this But what say you if they professe it with their lips and deny it in their liues and practise is such a Church a true visible Church I answer Answ a fearefull state are all such Churches in for God cannot bee more dishonoured his Spirit more grieued his Gospell more reproched his children more offended Satan and all Gods enemies more gratified and aduantaged then by this yet farre bee it from vs to denie them to bee a true visible Church so long as Gods sauing Truth is profest amongst them it cannot bee though there be neuer so great and generall a falling away from the practise of it but that some doe liue as they professe though they be not seene to vs. And therefore for their sakes though they bee but few and not to bee outwardly discerned it is to be reputed a true visible Church though a very corrupt and impure one The third exception But what say you of such a Church which though they professe the whole sauing faith yet they doe in certaine some crosse opinions which ouerthrow it Answ I answer wee must consider what manner of opinions these be which that Church holdes First whether they be such as ouerthrow the foundation secondly whether they bee publikely profest as the Doctrine of that Church thirdly whether they bee persisted in after they haue been admonisht by
Church gouerned by the word not else And in this sense the good Kings both of Israel and Iudah were alwaies the head of the Church not in deciding matters of Faith and Religion for that Gods Word decides But this word Head of the Church must be warily vsed because it is not found in the Scripture but chiefe Gouernor is and therfore in that sense the King may be said to be head of the Church within his dominions because vnder Christ he is chief Gouernor Secondly they except say the vniuersal visible Church hath a visible head Now where is this visible Head Christ is not visible I answer Yes Christ is visible for first though he be not actually seene in this dispensation of time yet he may be seene If the King after he is crownd should keep himself in his Closet all his life time yet hee is a King and a visible King too though he be not actually seene of his subiects So Christ he is the King of his Church and is now in heauen where the Saints see him and where wee shall see him too and that with these eyes of ours and therefore he is visible though he be not actually seene of vs now Secondly I answer that in some sort he is visible daily in his Church in the Word and in the Sacraments especially in the Lords Supper in these Christ is amongst vs and in our sight crucified Gal. 3.1 Thirdly hee was once visible and seene on earth for many yeeres and shall bee seene by euery eye at the last day and that as the head of the Church Fourthly his Ministers together with lawfull Magistrates doe in some sort visibly represent him amongst vs. So that Christ and not the Pope is the head of the visible Church though he be not actually seene euery day amongst vs. And so much for the first Vse The second Vse is matter of comfort to Gods Church in Vse 2 that Christ is their head and that many wayes First it shewes the excellency of the Church secondly the neerenesse it hath with Christ lastly it shewes the safety of the Church First it shewes the excellency of the Church for seeing it hath such a glorious Head as our Lord Christ is therefore the body must needs be glorious too the greatest Kingdomes and Monarchs in the World come infinitely short of the excellency of the Church euen as farre as their Gouernors come short of the excellency of Christ that is as farre as mortall and sinfull man comes short of the eternall and blessed Sonne of God As Christ hath a Name aboue all names to bee the Head of heads that is the most excellent and glorious head so hath the Church in her measure a name aboue all names the body of bodies the most excellent and glorious body in the World Secondly it shewes the neere coniunction the Church hath with Christ and is matter of comfort to the Church in that respect There is no coniunction so neere as this let any or all the Societies in the World shew me such a neere coniunction betwixt them and their Gouernours as is betwixt Christ and his Church Seruants haue their Lords Companies their Masters Cities their Maiors Subiects their Kings Sheepe their Shepheards c. yea but the Church hath Christ to be her head and this is the neerest coniunction that can be Other Gouernours of other Societies those that are vnder them or conioyned with them in the same Company may haue hurt and yet they not know of it or if they know it they doe not affect it at least if they doe affect it it is but for conscience of their place onely But Christ knowes the harmes and wrongs that are done to his Church and affects them as done to himselfe Act. 9. Saul Saul why persecutest thou me saith our Sauiour he tooke the iniury that Saul offered to his Church as done to himselfe And of necessity Christ must needs be sensible of the harmes done to his Church as the head is of the hurt done to the body It is imposible but that the head should be sensible of the hurt done to the body and that in regard of it selfe as well as of the members This the Church considers and receiues inestimable comfort by the consideration thereof for by this they are assured of Christs neerest presence to them in their afflictions by meanes of this neere coniunction and also they are assured that he will releeue them of the wrongs and iniuries done vnto them and reuenge them on their enemies as done to himselfe And also he will mercifully recompence all our releeuers as if they had releeued him on earth in his greatest extremity This point is maruellous comfortable to all such as know themselues to be liuing members of his body the Church Thirdly this is matter of comfort to vs in regard of our safety which wee haue by meanes of this neere coniunction Christ is our head therefore we shall be safe the gates of hell shall not preuaile against vs we are builded vpon the Rocke and that Rocke is Christ and they shall neuer preuaile against vs if they can preuaile against Christ then they may preuaile against vs too but the one is impossible and so is the other too Secondly it assures vs that we shall preuaile against them nay it is past doing for it is done already for Christ our head hath ouercome the World the Diuell and all the powers of darknesse the head being aboue water the body cannot possibly be drowned I haue ouercome the World saith our Sauiour Thirdly it assures vs that certainly we shall liue and reigne in heauen for where the head is there the members shall be also Ioh. 17.24 yea wee are already by communication with him in heauenly places Ephes 2.6 because he being our Head is there already The third vse is for instruction that seeing Christ is the Vse 3 head of a true visible Church then we must labour so to esteeme him and to beleeue in him to reuerence him and to obey him as our head First therefore seeing it is the nature of the head to conuey life sense and motion to the Body let vs therefore waite vpon our head Iesus Christ and call vpon him for his life and Spirit and for his direction in all our actions both for matter of Doctrine and manners and discipline too and also let vs defie all other directions and all other counsels that doe not agree either particularly or at least in the generall with his reuealed will all directions therefore that are against Christ and against his Word though it were brought to vs by an Angell from heauen we must not receiue it but stand at defiance with it and we must submit our selues intirely to the Scepter of the Word and Spirit of our Head Christ It was Israels peruersnesse 1 Sam. 8.7 and the Iewes wilfulnesse Luk. 19.14 that they did refuse to haue Christ to be their head
and to raigne ouer them and therefore he refused them to bee his Body therefore what direction soeuer Christ tenders vnto vs we must obey it and whatsoeuer is against the directions of Christ wee must defie them And secondly seeing Christ is our head therefore whatsoeuer life or direction wee haue in spirituall things wee must acknowledge the Fountaine of them that we haue them not of our selues but from him onely for of his fulnesse wee all receiue grace for grace Ioh. 1.16 and without him we are able to doe nothing Ioh. 15.5 and by him we are able to doe all things Phil. 4.13 Marke how sweetely these places agree together wee receiue all from him without him wee can doe nothing by him we are able to doe all things therefore whatsoeuer good things wee haue spirituall life or graces wee must receiue them thankfully embrace them sweetely vse them gratiously to the honor of thy head and the good comfort of thy selfe and thy fellow-members so likewise for vnprofitable members that dishonor our head wee should pray that our head Christ Iesus would either make them profitable or else cut them off and also that he would be pleased to purge from his body the noysome humours as sinne and superstition that so hee may haue a sound and a healthfull body Thirdly and lastly seeing Christ is our head therefore as he hath a gracious care for our safety so we should be as carefull to preserue and maintaine his honour and glory we should reioyce when we see his honor and glory aduanced and we should mourne and bee greeued when we see it opposed And so likewise we should bee affected with the good or harme of our fellow-members 1 Cor. 12.25 we should be carefull to bring one another to heauen and not bee carelesse whether they come thither or no. Vse 4 The last Vse is this hence wee haue a sufficient warrant that the Church of England is a true visible Church because Christ our head spirituall life and the Doctrine of Saluation is found truly in our Church But our aduersaries except against vs First say they you haue not Gods ordinances amongst you and therefore you haue not Christ to be your head We answer that they must shew vs out of Gods word that those are the ordinances of Christ which we want But say they you haue Antichrist to bee your head for you haue many things from him I answer we defy him as much as they do together with his doctrine wee defie his practises and courses if wee haue or vse any thing that he doth or hath vsed before vs first it is either no matter of substance but onely some passage or carriage or circumstance either in worship or gouernment or secondly they are such things as were vsed in purer time and Churches before Antichrist or thirdly it is of the best which that Church being in Apostacy that is hauing beene a Church and still pretending to continue the same hath reserued for still they haue some good things and professe some good truths Lastly at least it is throughly cleansed from their superstition and idolatry So that still we hauing Christ to be the head of our Church and his spirituall life and the Doctrine of saluation being found amongst vs and begetting spirituall life in many of vs we must needes bee a true visible Church And so much for this point The twelfth Lecture of the Church THe third point propounded to bee spoken of concerning the finding out of a true visible Church was touching the members of it for as I shewed you the Church being a body and that euery body consists of certaine members therefore if wee would exactly know the body we must know the members Now the members were taken either in a more generall sense including the head or else in a more strict and particular sense being considered as a diuerse thing from the head now because we would carry the matter fully before vs we tooke it in both those senses and hauing spoken of the members of the Church in the first sense where wee shewed that our Lord Iesus Christ was the head and the onely head of the true visible Church now we come to speake of the members of the Church in a more strict and particular sense being considered as a diuerse thing frō the head And thus considered the members are of three sorts First some are members by right onely and not by possession secondly some are members by possession not by right and thirdly some are members both by right and by possession First some are members of the visible Church by right onely not by possession for some members haue a good right in the body of the visible Church and the priuiledges thereunto belonging but yet are not actually possessed of them And of these there are diuers kindes irst generally all the elect of God liuing vpon the face of the earth that as yet are not called for the Church is theirs and the Word is theirs and the Sacraments are theirs and the Ministry is theirs the Lord specially intending his owne ordinances to the benefit of his chosen though indeed they themselues be notable so much as to know their own right in them much lesse are they able to reach forth their hands to claime it and enioy it yet because the Lord hath appointed them to be heires of saluation and therefore consequently hee hath appointed them a time in which hee will call them to the outward profession of the sauing faith therefore in respect of the purpose of God they are by right true members of the true visible Church though they be not as yet actually possessed of it And thus one and the same man may be at one and the same time a member of the Church malignant and Synagogue of Satan in his owne practice and profession and by right in respect of Gods purpose a true member of Christs true visible body This was the case of Saul who by his practice was of the malignant Church and persecuted the true Church of God and yet by right he was a member of the true Church of God Secondly those that are members of the true visible Church by right and not by possession are such as onely haue heard of Christ and of the Gospell and are endued with some little smatch of religion yet they are but entring into the Church onely their feet are in the Porch they are not yet come within the holy place they haue not yet receiued the Sacrament of Baptisme which is our admission into the visible Church so that after that time the Church doth acknowledge vs from thence forward to bee her children and wee acknowledge her to be our mother and so we are incorporated and become members of that body So then those that haue onely heard of Christ and of the Gospell and haue some little smatch of Religion they cannot iustly bee said to bee members by possession yet
therby to disgrace Church-gouernment and to make it the greatest trouble-state in the Christian world What was it that the Disciples contended about in our Sauiours time Luk 22.24 Was it not the matter of Church-gouernment Who should be the chiefest amongst them and so the Ruler and Gouernor of the rest By this occasion the Diuell made strife amongst the Apostles And what bred those great broyles and contentions in the primitiue Church betwixt the Easterne and the Westerne Bishops Was it not Church-gouernment which should bee the highest See and who should bee the highest and chiâ—â—â—t Bishop To goe further what brought forth Anti-Christ into the world and that aduanced the Pope to that high pitch which hee came to was it not Church-gouernment The Pope audaciously ingrossing all Soueraignty in the Church to himselfe and many good Bishops and Churches in their weaknesse yeelding too much to him in that kinde by the peruersenesse of the gouerned In a word what dishonour hath hereby beene done to God What disgrace to Religion What hinderance to the prosperous successe of the Gospell and of the Kingdom of Christ What furtherance and aduantage to the Kingdome of Satan What heart-burning hath it bred amongst some How hath it alienated the hearts of others from vs and that in many that otherwise are inclinable towards vs What tumults hath it bred at home What clamours abroad What griefe hath it brought to our friends and well affected What reioycing to our enemies and profane persons What distractions and doubts hath it bred in weake and tender Consciences What disheartning and discouraging hath it beene How many excellent Talents for Gods ministry haue beene hereby buried in the ground without profit And so consequently many congregations destitute of their faithfull Ministers and of their heauenly food and left as a prey to the Rauening Wolues by this meanes had they not by the prouidence and wisedome of our Gouernours beene otherwise prouided for I dare vndertake that in all likelihood had not the Diuell cast this bone amongst vs and throwne this businesse of Church-gouernment as a football before vs for euery one to runne after and so to set vs all together by the eares this Church of England through Gods blessing had been this day the most famous and flourishing Church that euer was in the world whereas now this businesse this onely businesse of Church-gouernment hath occasionally by the peeuishnesse of some hatched nourished and brought forth much ignorance prophannesse vncharitablenesse contempt of holinesse neglect of Gods ordâ—â—â—â—ces loosenesse and licentiousnesse I grieue to thinke on these things and I can haue no pleasure to speake of them and we may be all ashamed of them before God and the World and it must be euery ones care and endeauour to be instant with God by prayer that in his good time he would be pleased to redresse these foule euils yet here I haue mentioned them to the end that we may be both whetted on by these considerations to looke the more carefully into this businesse and also that we might be admonished to carry our selues the more temperately and moderately towards it And so much of the first point namely of the harmes and euils that haue happened occasionally by this matter of the Church-Gouernment though in it selfe holy and good The second point is what is meant by Church-Government Yea see here two words Church and Gouernment and each of these may carry three senses First for the word Church wee are not here to vnderstand it of the Catholike Church for that being dispersed ouer all places of the world cannot well be brought within the compasse of the same Lawes nor ruled by the same earthly Gouernours it is impossible for the reatures to weild such a great charge The sole Gouernour of the Church in this sense is Iesus Christ the onely Head thereof And the onely Lawes it is to be gouerned by is the presence power and direction of the Spirit but here we vnderstand it of a particular visible Church whether it be Parochiall Nationall or Prouinciall for these being confined and bounded within their seuerall places may and must haue their seuerall Lawes and Gouernours euery one for and within it selfe of this Church it is that we here speake of whether it be greater or lesse Now we come to the next word Gouernment which word in a generall sense signifies to maintaine secondly in particular to gouerne First in generall in respect of the state of nature as wee are men so the Lord gouernes that is maintaines and preserues his Church seating euery particular Church in the place where it is making a Fence about it feeding and clothing them supplying their wants affording them helpes and meanes for their reliefe defending them from their enemies deliuering them from dangers causing them to thriue and prosper in outward things and couering them with his fauour as with a shield And this kind of Gouernment the Lord extends ouer the whole world yea euen to the wicked as well as to the faithfull yet with this difference to the wicked in the common fauour of his prouidence to the faithfull in the speciall fauour of his Grace in Christ for euen in the very temporall blessings that the faithfull haue in this life they are theirs by Grace and promise in Christ And therefore to the wicked they perish in the inioying of them they haue no further benefit of them but outward and temporall to the faithfull they are helpefull and seruiceable in some degree to the worke of their eternall saluation for so God intends them and so the faithfull accept and vse them This is for the generall Gouernment of God in respect of the state of nature as we are men Secondly there is a particular Gouernment in respect of the estate of Grace as we are men professing the sauing Faith of Iesus Christ and so the Gouernment is twofold inward and outward First inward and this is proper to the Spirit of Christ God onely ruling in the hearts of his chosen as a King by the power of his Word and Spirit conuerting them from the seruice of sinne to the seruice of God causing them to beleeue Gods promises in Christ and so iustifying vs from our sinnes crucifying the old man and quickning the new acquainting vs with his will and framing vs to obedience putting good motions from time to time into our minds and stirring vs vp and enabling vs to entertaine them graciously and to giue place vnto them and so sanctifying vs and further he assures vs of Gods loue and fauour and our election in Christ and so comforts vs further he increaseth these and other Graces in vs euery day more and more so long as wee are in this world till at length they bee fully perfected in vs and wee receiued into his Kingdome of glory in heauen and so hee glorifies vs. This this is the right Kingdome of God and of Christ whereby God raignes in vs as
They are mingled with the professors of Mahomet which is a most pestilent Religion directly opposite to the Christian faith admitting no colour of Reconciliation but if we beleeue in Christ we must reiect Mahomet and if we beleeue in Mahomet we must reiect Christ And yet the Lord I say hath shewed himselfe a Ruler in the midst of his sorest enemies preseruing his faith and Church euen wheâ—e Satans throne is as he did the church of of Pergamus Reu. 2.13 secondly as it is a Pestilent Religion directly opposite to Christ so consider that it generally abounds and swarmes ouerspreading a great part of the knowne world and yet in these places the Lord hath reserued a remnant that sticke close vnto him and that follow not the sway of the world as he had 7000. in Israel in the daies of Elias that had not bowed their knees to Baall Rom. 11.4 so hee hath many thousands among them that haue not bowed the knee to Mahomet Thirdly consider the pleasingnesse of that Religion of Mahomet a great inchanter of nature yet still the Lord hath preserued some that chose rather with Moses to suffer aduersity with the children of God then to inioy for a season all the pleasure that euer Mahomet could euer promise or bestow vpon them Surely we must needs acknowledge it to be a heauy iudgement of God that such flourishing Churches in Achaia Macedonia Corinth Ephesus c. should come to that miserable ruine and desolation that Mahomet should raigne amongst them so generally in Christs own Territories and let vs know that it was for their vnprofitablenes in the vse of the Gospell and other meanes of grace which God so freely offered them and let vs consider of it and feare and labour to profit by the Gospell and pray to God that the like befall not vs for our vnprofitablenesse This I say is a great iudgement of God vpon them and yet withall see how in wrath God remembers mercy and in despight of Satan Turke and Mahomet and other instruments hee plucks out some as firebrands out of the fire to be professors of his sauing faith and members of his Church and the gates of hell shall not preuaile against them And so much of the Greeke Churches both improperly and properly so called Now wee come to the Westerne and Latin Churches which are generally of two sorts some acknowledging the Pope their head as the Church of Rome it selfe and sundry others that hold communion with that Church both in Doctrine and in all or most of the corruptions thereof others renouncing his headship and refusing to communicate in the deformities corruptions and abuses of the church of Rome being therefore called the reformed Churches I shall not neede to speake of the former in euery particular looke what is said of the Church of Rome it selfe the same may be applyed to all the rest as is the mother so is the daughter Ezech. 16.44 We will deliuer her state in two obseruation First we will shew what may be said in charity and yet in truth and sound iudgement for the church of Rome Secondly what may be said in zeale and yet in truth too and found iudgement against it For the first the obseruation is this Doctr. 1 That the Church of Rome euen as now it stands may in some sense be iustly reputed and acknowledged a true visible Church consider rightly of the Note First wee doe not absolutely say it is a true Church but for ought wee see it may in some sense be iudged a true visible Church Secondly wee say not a sound Church no that wee flatly deny as vntrue but a true visible Church as a man though hee be wounded fainting and dying yet so long as there is any sparke of life in him hee is a true liuing man not a false though he be an vnsound and dying man Thirdly we make a difference betwixt the Papacy or the Popish factâ—on and some better spirits in that Church which no doubt haue a righter beliefe and walke with a righter foote in the profession of the Gospell then the faction doth and these being mingled together with the rest the whole may be called a â—â—ue Church for their sakes as was in our Sauiors time the Scribes and Pharises were a faction in the Church pretending Religion and the true worship of God and yet swaying all against the truth and sincerity of it in their courses Mary Simeon Anna Zachary and Elizabeth and a few more with whom our Sauiour ioyned or rather they with him as liuing member of Gods Church and should not the whole be rightly acknowledged to be a true Church because of them Doubtlesse it may and so the church of Rome may rightly be acknowledged to be a true Church in respect of some better spirits that are mixed with them and not in respect of the Papacy and Popish faction alone The reasons to proue them a true Church are these first Reas 1 they haue beene a true Church of God directly affirming euery part of the foundation and they doe not directly deny any part of it yea in outward shew of words they expressely affirme it still and therefore may truely be acknowledged a true Church That they haue beene a true Church of God is plaine enough Rom. 1.8 But yee will say that is no sound arguement that they are so still I answer that yet this is to be considered for it is a great matter that must make a congregation that hath beene a true Church to become a false one and with more charity and loue are such to be censured that are in the state of Apostacy then other congregations holding the same errors that are but onely comming on in the saith and haue not yet beene throughly possest of the true being of a Church The Church of Ephesus was fallen away from her first loue Reuel 2.5 And the Church of Sardy had a name that she loued and yet was deade Reu. 3 1. And yet God calls them true Churches still A Church in Apostacy that is falling not vtterly fallen is still a true though an vnsound and dying Church hauing been a true Church and not directly ouerthrowing the foundation so long it may be still intituled a true Church well then the church of Rome hauing bin a true church it must appeare that they in outward shew at least affirme the whole foundation and euery part thereof but this they doe they affirme the whole foundation at least in outward shew and sound of words they professe the same Scriptures and the same Creed that we do yea they professe in words the very same foundation before spoken of in the very same termes in effect Looke into the Rhemists Testament you shall see that vpon those places 1 Tim. 2.5 1 Iohn 1.7 they acknowledge Iesus Christ to be the onely Sauiour of the world and therfore they may in some sense be rightly acknowledged
a true visible Church I grant that they come very neere the roote of faith and ouerthrow the foundation almost to the very ground by the Doctrine of Iustification by workes which error if they would reclaime few or none of vs would doubt but that they are a true visible Church yet this ouerthrowes Christ not directly but by consequence by consequence they doe because if mans merits iustifie then Christs merits alone doe not iustifie vs but directly they doe not for still they beleeue in Christ their onely Sauiour and they say that it is Christs merits that makes them merit they are not so grosse in this point as they were yet still they are grosse enough ouerthrowing the foundation by consequence yet still by consequence onely not directly and therefore still they may be reputed a true visible Church but ye will say is it not as dangerous against a mans saluation to deny Christ by Consequence as to deny him directly to shut him out at the backe-doore as at the foredore I answer It is not so great a sinne yet I say hee that doth this deserues in Gods Iustice to be cut off from Christs mercy as well as the other especially if hee see the consequent but if hee see it not it is not so foule a sinne as to deny Christ directly he that directly denies the foundation whether hee see it or not is in certaine state of Damnation but he that denies it by consequence and sees it not but yet doth firmely beleeue in Christ so farre as he knowes and is willing in reuerence and humility to learne more and to obey better and doth daily repent and beg mercy of God for his failings the Lord doth ordinarily either inlighten such an one and so bring him to repent or else doth forgiue him his ignorances and so saue him So that hee that denies Christ directly is in certaine state of damnation vnlesse he haue a partâ—cular repentance for that sinne but he that denies Christ by consequence if he confesse his ignorances and weaknesse to God and craue pardon of them and labour for more knowledge may be saued though they haue not this particular repentance for that sinne And that this is the case of many thousand poore simple soules that heretofore haue beene and now are contained in the besome of the Church of Rome no man of any bowells of charity can suspect So much for the first reason The second reason is taken from the comparison of Reas 2 the Church of Rome with other Churches in the same state compare her to the Church of Israel in Exod. 32.6 There they fell to Idolatrie worshipping the Calfe and yet they were a true Church still and in Numb 25.3 9. compared with the 1 Cor. 3.8 we see that they ioined themselues to Baalpeor and committed fornication with the Moabites thus they were very bad and yet a true Church still Looke further into the time of Ieroboam that set vp the Calues and made all Israel to sinne so that God threatned to giue them vp for the sinne of Ieroboam 1 King 14.16 and so in Ahabs time in the 1 Kings 16.30 Ahab the Sonne of Omri did worse in the sight of the Lord then all that were before him and so a time was when there was no passe-ouer in Israel for many yeeres and yet they were a true visible Church still So likewise compare it with the estate of the Church of the Iewes in our Sauiours time it was in the state of Apostasy and yet a true Church the Scribes and Pharises retaining some notable truthes were still to be heard Matth. 23.3 and yet their Leuen to be taken heed of Matthew 16.6 so that though they had many corrruptions yet they were a true visible Church The Church of Galatia retained circumcision whereby all profit and benefit by Christ is vtterly m de voide that is by consequence The Apostle saith Galat. 5.2 that if we be circumcised Christ shall profit vs nothing and yet this was a true Church still and I dare say that circumcision doth as neerely cut off from Christ as Iustification by workes by consequence they do both ouerthrow the foundation And so the Church of Sardis that had but a name to liue and was dead Reuel 3.1 was yet a true Church Now if all these were true Churches that were thus corruped why may not the Church of Rome though it be Idolatrous and haue many other foule corruptions be in some sense reputed a true visible Reas 3 Church The third Reasen is drawne from the Confession of many euen of our best Diuines as Luther Caluin Zanchey Morney and others that were most fierie and fierce against the Romish Church hating their abominations with as perfect hatred and detestation as any and yet they confest her to be a true Church though a corrupt Church though a dying Church though her life hung but by a thred this they haue confest of her I alleadge this not so much a Reason to prooue but rather as a qualification to mitigate the odiousnesse of this Speech in the eares of many which doe greatly reuerence the iudgement of these fathers and yet cannot endure to heare that the name of a true Church should be afforded to Rome Reas 4 Lastly their Baptisme is true Baptisme and therefore they are a true though an vnsound visible Church for the truenesse of the Church and of Christs Sacraments by them administred do necessarily inferre each other wheresoeuer there is a true Sacrament rightly administred for the substance of it there is a true Church But Baptisme in the church of Rome is rightly administred for the substance of it and therefore the church of Rome is a true church The error of rebaptization of such as haue beene baptised by Heretiques did arise from the want of the due consideration of the very like point in those things So much for the reason Vse 1 The Vses are these first then this teacheth vs that those were lawfully baptised that haue beene baptised in the Church of Rome and that the Baptisme wee receiued from them is lawfull Baptisme But some except and say that they that are Baptized in the Church of Rome are baptised into their faith I Answer No but they are Baptised into the Faith of the Trinity And this is the singular wisedome and mercy of God to keepe them sound in that that is for the substance of Baptisme though otherwise they are generally corrupt But ye will say It is intended by them into their faith I Answer first that their intent is so as being perswaded their faith is the true Christian Faith And secondly I Answer the Ministers intent makes not the Sacrament answerable to it but it is Gods worke and he makes it to a faithfull receiuer effectuall to the Vse 2 right vse that he hath ordained it vnto Secondly it iustifies our ministry against the Brownists and the Papists
that say wee haue no true Ordination we Answer that we had our ordination from the Church of Rome at the first and that being a true visible Church therefore we haue a lawfull Ministery Vse 3 Thirdly this may serue for satisfaction to that question which the Papists aske vs where was your Church before Luthers time did he erect a new church No he erected no new church but by his Ministry brought many faithfull out of their impure and vnsound Church into a more sound and pure Church not onely for matters of ceremonies for then he had beene a Schismatique to separate from them but for matters of substance so that this point well considered preuents a number of inconueniences which wee should runne into if wee should fall into that heate of zeale as to deny them to bee a true visible Church Vse 4 Fourthly this may comfort vs in respect of our fathers that haue liued in the Popish Church what shall we thinke of them that they liued in no true visible Church and therefore could not be saued far bee it from vs no we are perswaded that they liued in a true Church and that many of them where sound in those times and now saued they attained not to that high straine of Iustification by workes I would faine know whether they did not doe that they did ignorantly or whether they did challenge or disclaime their merits on their death beds many at the point of death disclaime their merits now though that point now is more stiffly defended by the Popish faction then euer it was much more did they doe it then Now to disclaime all their owne merits at their death is not that both repentance of former errors if any in that kinde and faith in Christ alone too If any beleeue in Christ crucified in truth of heart though hee hold but by the hemme of his garment shall he perish Surely no. Vse 5 Lastly this teacheth vs to vse charity towards them of the Popish Church in censuring of their estate we are not rigourously and rashly to call for fire from heauen vpon them as the Disciples would haue Christ haue done on the Samaritanes No yee know not what Spirit ye are of saith our Sauiour wee must not rashly Iudge them to bee vnbeleeuers but rather mis-beleeuers And so much for that point what in charity and yet in truth maybe said for that Church The seuen and Twentieth LECTVRE of the CHVRCH HAuing entred into the last point concerning the matter of the Church namely the application of the Doctrine of the Church to all Churches that we know in the world After we had diuided them according to their scituation and language into the Easterne and Westerne the Greeke and Latin Churches we beganne with the Easterne and Greeke Churches and so proceeded to the Westerne and Latin Churches And of them I tould you that some were vnder the yoke of the Pope and haue him to bee their head Others haue shooke off that yoke and head-shippe and are therefore called the Reformed Churches Concerning the Church of Rome that which is spoken of her may be applyed to her Adherents as is the mother â—o is the daughter as I haue said Now for the Chuâ—ch of Rome I propounded these two obseruations to be spoken to first what might be-spoken in charity for her and yet in truth and sound iudgement too and of that we haue spoken Secondly what in zeale and yet in truth and sound iudgement too may be said against it And that is it which wee are now to speake to what may be said in zeale and yet in truth and sound iugement against her A point very needfull to be well cleared and rightly vnderstood for whereas we haue deliuered in the former obseruation that the Church of Rome in some sense may rightly be reputed a true visible Church ' Euery one will be ready to except against it and say why then haue yeâ— forsaken it why doe ye not still hould communion with her what iust exception can yee alledge for your separation from her For Answere to which exception Doct. 2 I will propound in the second place this obseruation namely that howsoeuer the Church of Rome in some sense may be reputed a true visible Church yet it is maruellous vnsound and corrupt and exceedingly corrupt with many foule abuses errors and abhominations yea so corrupt as it is not lawfull nor safe for vs to communicate with her The Obseruation ye see consists of two branches the former is the ground of the latter auouching that shee is polluted with many foule abhominations the latter is an inference from the former that therefore it is not safe nor lawfull to ioyne with her The whole obseruation is to be vnderstood of that Church specially in respect of the Popish faction the Pope and his Darlings for as when wee spoke in charity for them acknowledging that in some sense they are to be reputed a true visible Church it was intended of some that were of better Spirits amongst them that are sounder in some chiefe points of Religion and that are not so obstinate in their errours as the rest So now that we come to speake in zeale against them that they are so foulely polluted that it is not safe to ioyne with them It is intended in respect of the Pope and his chiefe Darlings and factors called the Popish faction neyther is this any wrong to the Church that we so speake of the whole body in generall tearmes because the Church and faction are there mingled together in that Body as when wee come into a Barne floore and see a great deale of chaffe in the same heape with good wheat we may speake fauourably of the wheate and say there is good corne and we may speake disgracefully of it too and say it is but light stuffe We will begin with the first part of the obseruation that condemnes her corruptions And we will reduce all her corruptions to these two sorts First matter of Doctrine secondly matter of practice And though these be much incident one to the other yet for playnnesse sake we will distinguish them God willing as well as wee can First for Doctrine the point is this The Doctrine of the Church of Rome as it is at this day vnderstood and maintained by the Popish faction is very vnsound and corrupt full of grosse and abhominable errors they haue changed the truth of God into a lye light into darknesse and the Gospell of Christ the comfortable Doctrine of grace and faith into the erors of Antichrist and the damnable Doctrine of workes and merits and of mans traditions We wil not speake of all her corruptions in doctrine that were too much only we will shew it in some chiefe particulars that briefely we wil reduce them to these foure heads The first is error in Doctrine concerning the Scripture the second is concerning the direct
consent proues not alwaies a true Church nor a true Religion for then the Iewes should be a true Church and their Religion true because they all consented to crucifie Christ and with one voyce cryed Crucifie him crucifie him here is consent and yet in the bloodiest matter that euer was in the world And so on the contrary Peter Paul and Paul and Barnabas should be of a false Church and a false Religion because they dissented and contended sharply but this was nothing to ouerthrow the truth of their Religion nor of the Church they were members of yea we see oft times that the worst matters are carried with the greatest consent and the best with great dissention as it is in the body that is the soundest body that striues most to expell hurtfull humours so that is the soundest Church that is most exercised with bickerings against the aduersaries of the Truth and in the true Church it is needfull that there should be dissentions and heresies that those that are approued may be knowne 1 Cor. 11.18 19. So much be spoken for the Papists exceptions which they take against vs for this dissention Now secondly wee are to shew what vse we are to make of these dissentions and differences surely though wee will not name them yet wee may make many good vses of them and first this should stirre vp our bowels of compassion to mourne for the breaches of Ierusalem and to see the Lord dishonoured and his truth blasphemed and the Church miserably distracted by mens infirmities frailties and dissentions Secondly this discouers the diuells malice that cannot not endure to see the worke of God to goe on prosperously forward but sets euen the builders themselues at variance to hinder them from building and from ioyning together with one hand against the common aduersarie yea he carries them into such outrage of passion and speech that thereby their persons and cause is much disgraced before the world so that if they were censured by his outrage they may seeme rather to be of the diuell then of God Thirdly heere wee may see the corruption and weakenesse if not wilfulnesse of men that rather then they will disclaime their errors and put vp disgracefull and opprobrious speeches they passe not to set the whole Church of God on fire Fourthly hence wee learne the nature of truth that neuer comes forth but incumbred with many oppositions both within and without and still mingled with some errors and contentions euen in the chiefe professors themselues Lastly hence we learne the power wisedome and goodnesse of God so that doth restraine the rage of man and the malice of Satan that howsoeuer we differ in some points yet we agree in the chiefe as in Iustification by faith alone and howsoeuer we differ among our selues yet each of vs agree against Anti-Christ and Popery with a common hand though not so throughly as otherwise we might doe yet so as neither of vs yeeld one iot to the Papist though they expected long ere this to haue deuoured both them and vs as a prey or at least that they should haue slept in a whole skinne as wee say working vpon the aduantage of our former dissentions The third point is what wee are to esteeme of these Churches notwithstanding these errors and dissentions Surlev if we should condemne them as false Churches wee should be very vncharitable and wicked For they haue been the chiefest instrument vnder God of our calling therefore far be it from vs to deny them to bee a true Church Besides we should wrong them much for seeing they affirme directly the foundation and euery part thereof there is no colour why wee should giue such hard sentence against them therefore let vs esteeme them as brethren and acknowledge them to be Gods owne Churches and let vs commiserate their blindnesse and ignorance and let vs beare with their infirmities and let vs passe by the wrongs they offer vs and let vs blesse God for the good that is in them and let vs intreate God to open their eyes and to pacify their mindes and to reconcile these vnhappy differences that are betwixt vs and to knit our hearts together in the bond of peace that we may be all of one minde and iudgement and speake one and the same thing And so much bee spoken concerning the Lutheran Churches Now we come to speake of our own Church which hath beene the speciall reach and shall bee the finall conclusion of this whole discourse We are generally acknowledged by most Protestant Churches that we are as well reformed in Doctrine as any Church It is Gods great mercy to vs that we are so reformed in the best and weightiest things And it is no small comfort to vs that wee haue the approbation of other Churches confessing for vs that we are a true Church of God sound in the faith so that if we doe faile in discipline as they say yet the substance being sound the danger is the lesse Discipline makes onely for the Beauty of a Church but yet neyther doâ—h the presence of it make a true Church nor the absence of it cannot marre the life being of a true Church therfore if wee be not reformed herein as we should for some reformation we haue many points and parts of Discipline are farre better amongst vs then in the Popish Churches yet as long as our faith is sound the life and being of our Church is sound and good I will deliuer the point by way of Obseruation Doctr. and that is this The Church of England euen as now it stands though it be guilty of many saylings and weaknesses yet notwithstanding it is a true and in good measure a sound visible Church of God first I doe acknowledge many faylings weaknesses in our church that I may not bee mistaken as if I should smooth vp the State of our Church as many doe with all is well when some things are amisse or iustifie euery particular because we haue many good things amongst vs No if there be any Baal amongst vs let him plead for himselfe I wil not plead for him Secondly I say that it is not onely a true but in some good measure a sound visible Church to distinguish it from other Churches specially from the Church of Rome which in some sense as we shewed is a true visible church but very vnsound but ours is true sound too that in some good measure The want of which difference rightly obserued hath caused many vncharitable censures to passe from vs against the church of Rome from the separatists against vs Thirdly I speake of the Church of England indefinitely which seemes strange in some eares that the whole company of professors in England should be called one Church and so make a nationall Church which say they is meerely a humane inuention not warrantable by the Word but to iustifie this speech against their exception take these
either more or lesse pure Fourthly they are more or lesse perfect Exception 1. Exception 2. Exception 3. The Church of England a true visible Church Eleuen Considerations to moue vs in England to be thankefull for the truth of God amongst vs and they shew the greatnesse of the blessing The second thing considerable in a true visible Church are the causes of it And they be of two sorts The second sort of causes haue first spoken of and they of two sorts Of this diuers Of this diuers The first sort of causes handled such as cause the Church directly and these are foure taking the Church in a comparatiue sense Taking the Church absolutely there are siue The efficient cause The instrumentall cause First outward Secondly inward How all the three persons haue a hand in causing the Church The Church of England iustified to be a true Church against the Separation The Church of England hath the meanes of saluation and of a Church Obiect You want dâ—scipline Your Ministers haue not a true Calling You haue your Calling from the Church of Rome You haue no couenant betwixt you and God Obiect You want the successe of the meanes It is ordinarily effectuall The first thing considerable in a visible Church the members of it In it first of the head And in it three things Corpus adaequatum Sit Christus Christiani caput Aug. lib. 3. cont Petil. c. 42. Reinolds confer 5. The blasphemy the Church of Rome doth run into in saying the Pope is the head of the Church The blow they giue to Christ therein in two respects First in regard of the body the Church The Pope is Antichrist Christ neuer gaue the headship of the Church to Peter Papists plea for the headship of the Pope answered Places alleaged by them for this answered as Mat. 16.19 And Ioh. 21.16 17. And Mat. 16.18 Christ saith He neuer will giue it None is able to weeld and sway it Secondly in regard of the Head Christ The power and authority that is giuen to the Pope proueth that he cannot be a ministeriall head as is pretended but rather a supreame head The Pope is made the Doctor yea the only Doctor of the Church The Pope doth what he doth of himselfe and not as vnder Christ for he taketh not the course prescribed by Christ in that he doth The Pope taketh vpon him to iudge the Apostles doctrine and so to be Peters Master and so proues himselfe to be Antichrist The Pope takes Christs name vpon him viz. Chiefe Shepheard Obiect You make the King head of the Church The word Head of the Church to be warily vsed because not found in the Scripture Christ the Head of the Church is visible Matter of comfort to the Church many wayes The second thing considerable in the third thing touching a visible Church viz. the members thereof in a more strickt sense and they are of three sorts The first sort and of the diuers kinds The second sort And of this two sorts The third sort Hyper. method 574. Additum diminuens A Church cannot be denied to be a true visible Church though there be an hundred hypocrites in it to one beleeuer The Brownists obiection of our Church being a prophane multitude answered diuers wayes Obiect You let wicked ones continue in your Church without separation Hyp. 577. 580. c. Bernard against Brownists 1034. where the assemblies are bad there the good must separate but where the assemblies be good there the bad must separate The fourth generall thing considerable in a visible Church viz. the Markes of it Reasons why there should be Markes of the Church Two qualities of these Markes to make them legitimate The first quality and It is attended with three other tha◠〈◊〉 subordinate to them The second qualâ—â—â—â— of these markes Vrsin 582. Vogel 727. Caluin inst lib. 4 cap. 1 sect 10. in Acts 2.42 Non secùs ac belli duces vt dissipatum clade aliqua exercitum recolligant signa militaria vel accensos ignes ex edito loce conspiciendos proponunt quo pedem referant quotquot ex clade dispersis palantes vagantur Morn de eccles p. 27. Morney â—6 29 One sort of excepters against this doctrine and their exception Two considerations necessary Bernard against Separat 122. 123. â—â—Second sort of excepters against this doctrine and their exceptions Third sort of aduersaries to this doctrine viz. the Papists and the Markes they alleage and answers to them Bellar. de eccles mili p. 184. 188. The fifth thing considerable in a visible Church viz gouernment Vid. Polâ—â— 426 459. And in it fiue things handled First the harmes and euils that haue been raised in the Church of God occasionally by Church-gouernment Second thing in Church gouernment what is meant by it The third thing considerable in Church-gouernment viz how needfull it is Reasons and that of some sorts First sort of Reasons Second sort of Reasons Third sort of Reasons Fourth sort of Reasons Fiue differences betwixt the inward and outward gouernment of the Church 〈…〉 The fourth thing considerable in Church-gouernment viz. whether there be any prescript forme of Church Gouernment in euery particular set downe in the Word What the Scripture saith herein deliuered in two positions The first drawn into an Obseruation Two extremes to be auoided Second thing considerable in this fourth point of Church-gouernment viz. that there is not any one particular forme of Church-gouernment for euery particular set downe in Scripture The fifth thing considerable in Church-gouernment The whole forme of Church-gouernment consisteth of three principals First the dutie or actions to be done in Church-gouernment and they are sixe principall Vid. separat sâ—bisâ— 137. The second duties to be done Vid. Zegred 120. The third sort of duties to be done The fourth sort of workes to be done Church censures Reasons of this How to proceed â—â— this The 〈◊〉 dutyâ— The sixth duty The second principle whereupon Church-gouernment consisteth viz. the Persons or Officers that are to performe this duty generally Church-officers must haue two things First they must be qualified with a competent measure of gifts Secondly they must be lawfully appointed to such offices Particularly What these Officers are First Bishops First their name Secondly their office consisting in two things First in ordaining Ministers The obiection that the Apostles did ordaine as Apostles not as Bishops and Timothy and Titus as Euangelists not as Bishops answered Secondly in redressing things amisse Secondly Presbyters Their office first generally Secondly more particularly Thirdly Doctors Fourthly gouerning Elders Fifth deacons Philip preached and baptized rather as hee was an Euangelist than a Deacon Sixthly widdowes Eighthly the christian Magistrate wherein first that hee is a Church Officer Secondly wherein this office consisteth First generally Secondly particularly in fiue things The third pillar whereupon the Church-gouernment consisteth viz. the Rules and Lawes by which the Gouernours are to be directed And they are reduced to three heads
vnto vs the sufficiency Scripâ— Thirdly such as forbid any addition to or detraction from the Scripture Fourthly such as condemne all Doctrine taught either without or besides the Scripture Rhemists 15 Acts â— The Papists say the church may coyne new articles of faith What authority the Church hath about articles of Faith Hyper 6â— Hyper 54. Secondly that the Church make any booke to bee Canonicall Scripture Which the Papists hould this confuted by diuers reasons Thirdly that the Church hath power to deuise adde diminish or alter any part of Gods worship which the Church of Rome hath done prooued by diuerse things Fourthly concerning customes The fathers iudgement concerning customes Fifthly concerning traditions How and in what sense tradition is to bee receiued Answers to the Popish tenent concerning tradititions Answer 1. Ob. Answer wherin is shewed that the Baptisme of Infants the change of the Sabbath and that so many bookes are Canonicall Scripture and are not had by tradition but proued by good consequence out of the Scripture Answ 2. Answ 3. Their proofe out of 2 Thes 2.15 Answe Answ 4. The scripture the so onely rule of saith acknowledged to bee by all Churches generally Secondly the Scripture is the onely tryall of euery truth How euery matter of substance is to be found in the Scripture Concerning Churches power in matters of circumstance and they are of two sortes one of miracles and what is to be helde concerning the same Secondly of discipline and this is of two sorts either matter of dâ—scipline which is spoken of before or secondly matter of ceremonies and what the church hath power to doe therein The bounds the Church is to keepe in ordaining matters of ceremony 1. 2. Vse 2. 1. The ninth generall point concerning the Church viz. the application of all that hath bin spoken to all visible Churches in christendome that I know of The generall diuision of all churches that haue beene or are since our Sauiours time into Easterne and WesteÌ„rne and this according to their scâ—tuation Secondly according to their language and so some be greek and some latin Churches VVhether Schismaticall or hereticall Churches may be accounted true visible Churches What a Schismatike church is Hereticall Churches First what they are and when any particular man is to be reputed an Heretike Heresies of 2. sorts first such as ouerthrow the foundation What this fundation is Resol Those that deny directly this foundation or any part thereof cease to bee Christians and are no more visible Churcher The Greeke Churches be here spoken of and what weare to thinke of them 1. of the Greeke Churches generally disperse in most at the Easterne parts of the world Ortelius 100. Ortelius 97. 98. 108. Secondly the Greeke Churches which are more particularly and properly so called and what we are to hold of them deliuered in an obseruation Doct. The mayne error of the Greeke Churches The Greeke Churches better then the Popish-Church The Papists vnchatarible censuring the Greeke Churches answered The Greeke Churches not guâ—lty of Schisme from Rome The Greeke Churches neuer subiect to the Romane Church One note of the Church as the Papists account it is found in the Greeke Church viz succession of Bishops The goodnes of God in perseruing of his Churches seene in the Greeke Churches vnder the Turke The miseries of the Greeke Church vnder the Turke in many particulars in regard of their persecutions in regard of the Religion of the Turks The Religion of the Turks 1. a pestilent Religion directly opposite to Christ 2. It ouerspreadeth a great part of the knowne world 3. It is a pleasing Religion For what it was that the Lord suffered such famous Churches to come to ruine applied to vs. The Western churches and first of those that acknowledge the Pope their head as the Church of Rome and those that hold with her and what maâ— be said and held of her deliuered in two obseruations The church of Rome as now it standeth may in some sense be reputed a true visible Church A differenâ—e betweene the papacy or the popâ—sh â—action and some better spirits amongst them in regard of whom the whole may be called a true Church The popish church doth not directly deny any part of the fundation but in outward shew of words affirme it The church of Rome hath beene a true Church The Papists by their Doctrine of iustification by workes must ouerthrow the foundation they by this ouer throw Christ not directly but by consequence Quest Answ It is not so great a sin to deny Christ directly as by consequence yet hee that doth this deserueth to be cut off from Gods mercy The Church of Rome compared with the Church of Israel 2. with the Church of the Iewes in our Sauiours times With the Church of Galatia Circumcision doth as neerely by consequence cut off from Christ as iustification by workes with the of Church Sardis Baptisme a true Sacrament in Rome and rightly administred there for the substance of it Those that were Baptised in the Church of Rome were lawfully Baptised Ob 1. Answ Ob. 2. Answ The ordinati of our Ministers from the Church of Rome and yet a lawfull ordination The question where the Church was before Luthers time answered The inconuenience preuented by acknowledging that the Church of Rome may be accounted a true Church What to thinke of our fathers that liued in the Popish Church They of the Popish Chuâ—ch are to â—e â—udâ—ed rather mis-beleeuers then vnbeleeuers The 2. Obseruation wherein is further delired what may be sayd and held further of the church of Rome The Church of Rome so corrupt that it is not lawfull to ioyne with her This that is spoken against thee is in respect of the Pope and Popish factors Corruption of the Church of Rome reduced to 2. sorts 1. matter of Doctrine reduced to 1. part of the Doctrine Foure heads 1 concerning Scriptures And their error therein Three things 1 denying the sufficiency of the Scripture 2 Perâ—erting the truth of the Scripture 3 Disanulling the authorâ—ty and credit of the Scripture many wayes 1 teaching the apochryphaâ—l bookes to be canonicall Scripture Secondly equalling traditions of men with the written word of God Thirdly preferring the authority of the Church aboue the Scripture Two heads wherein they orre in matter of Doctrine viz concerning the direct offices of the Mediator The Papists say there bee many mediators betwixt God and man The distinction of mediators of intercession and redemption answered Two things in a Mediator To be mediator of intercession is peculiar to Christ as well as to be mediator of redemption The popish shâ—ft off praying to the Saints not as helpers but as intercessor Answered The popish reason for praying to the Saints departed drawn from our desiâ—ing the Saints on earth to pray for vs Answered The third head wherein the church of Rome erreth in doctrine and that is concerning Images The church of Rome an abominable whore deseruing
businesse My purpose is therfore God willing to trauerse this whole controuersie so farre as strength and time and your capacitie will permit and so farre as I conceiue I will deale plainly and simply and indifferently without preiudice to the Aduersaries Cause or partialitie to our owne cause without traducing them or flattering our selues nor will I wittingly conceale any of Gods Truth from you vpon any sinister affection or respect whatsoeuer It is your duty also to trauell with me in this businesse faithfully and conscionably both by prayer to God and all other our best endeauours with this reach alwaies in our eye that euery one of vs be found members euen of the Church liuing members euen of the true Church of God for as it is of riches it is comfortable speaking of them when wee haue a part in them so it is of the Church much more It is sweet and comfortable to speake of it then when we know ourselues to haue our parts therein And thus much for the Introduction to prepare vs to the religious and sanctified handling of the question Now we come to the question it selfe in the handling whereof first some generall Points art to bee laid downe secondly we are to come to the particular matter The generall Points are these First of the name secondly of the titles thirdly of the nature fourthly of the diuision of the true Church and so wee will make a passage into the true visible Church First we wil begin with the name Church is a word that we haue at the second hand from the Saxons for they call'd it Kirke the very ancient sound and pronunciation wherof many of our Nation in the Northerne parts retaine to this day but it seemes to be fetcht originally from the Greeke for as they call the Sabbath day the time wherein God is worshiped 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords that is the Lords day Reuel 1.10 so the place too for the Lords publike seruice Musc 555. Bulling But this is not so vsed in the Scriptures and therefore seeing wee are to speake of religious matters it is good to speake as the Scripture speakes we will therefore insist onely vpon the name that the Scripture expresseth it by In the former Testament the Originall signifies a Company or Congregation as in Exod. 16.1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Deut. 5.22 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 33.4 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And when it is so called it is intended by way of excellency of the Church as that being the assembly of assemblies the most excellent Assembly in the World In the new Testament it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Matth. 16 18. which signifies a calling or a company called forth from amongst the rest according to the custome of the Athenians where certaine men were called forth by the voyce of a Cryer from the rest by some speciall meeting and businesse and so the holy Ghost seemes to translate it from a ciuill sense and vse to a religious intending another manner of Cryer and calling then was in Athens And it doth not only signifie the company so called but also the place where they are assembled for publike and religious exercises which I cannot say that it so signifies in Scripture but in vse of speech amongst vs and in some Ecclesiasticall Histories Piscat on 1. Cor. 11.18 22. Muscul pag. 556. Hyper. Method 527. 528. When God tyed his presence to a materiall building as in the former Testament the Temple might more properly be called the Church but now that hee is tyed to a spirituall building onely which are the faithfull it is not so properly called so but yet Synagogue signifies as well the place as the company Luk. 7 5. And by a figure we may call the place by the name of that it containes This I speake to iustifie the vse of the word Church amongst vs though as I said I cannot see that it signifies so in Scripture The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Congregation intends in the sence of the holy Ghost three things first that there is a company of them whether many or few there must be a congregation secondly they must have vsuall and solemne meetings for the publike worship and service of God Thirdly that the Lord himselfe hath called them to bee of this assembly and to performe this duty and this last is the maine and principall thing intended in this word Doctr. And from hence from the name of the Church I will draw this obseruation namely That those which are of the Church are called forth of God from amongst the rest to the knowledge and obedience of his will To open the way to the easier and fuller vnderstanding of the point we must consider and make some discourse of callings this word is vsed much in Scripture and hath diuers significations Wee will make foure diuisions of Callings First there is a generall calling and a particular calling Secondly there is an extraordinary and an ordinary calling Thirdly there is an inward and an outward calling Fourthly there is an effectuall and a not effectuall calling First there is a generall and a particular calling A generall that is when God doth proffer the meanes of saluation to a whole Citie or a Nation or to the whole world as it is Act. 17.30 but now God admonisheth all men euery where to repent or else when God onely giues to some particular men some generall or confused notice of sauing grace A particular calling is when God tenders occasions and a meanes of grace in some particular manner to some particular persons comming neerer to sinne and dealing more directly with sinne Examples wee haue of this Psal 31.6 Dauid saith thou hast taught me wisedome in the secret of mine heart And such a calling had the Iaylor Act. 16.31 there God deales particularly and directly with sin Beleeue in the Lord Iesus Christ and thou shalt be saued Now if this particular Calling bee apprehended and layd hold upon when God tenders it then we are saued if not it increaseth our condemnation The second diuision of Callings is extraordinary and ordinary Extraordinary calling is when God calls men euen many times without meanes or by some by-meanes or by weake meanes not tending or at least not sufficient vsually to such effects or else by some rare and strange meanes as when Paul was called by a voyce from heauen Act. 9.3 An ordinary calling is when the means time place and effect of grace is such as they are vsually wont to bee in that case if any of them be away it is extraordinary in that respect yet if the meanes be ordinary that is the preaching of the Word the calling is ordinary too because God ordinarily seconds the preaching of his Word with the worke of the Spirit as we may see Act. 10.44 while Peter yet spake the Word the holy Ghost fell on all them that heard him and Act.
2.41 The third diuision of callings There is an outward and an inward calling An outward calling is when the meanes are outward as by the Word Sacraments Corrections Blessings Miracles the workes of Creation and prouidence the Edicts of the Magistrates or State wherein wee liue the naturall conscience and the common gifts of the Spirit all which of themselues onely goe to the outward man and procure an externall obedience to Gods call Examples might be giuen of euery one of these and this is it our Sauior speakes of Matth. 22.24 Many are called but few are chosen An inward calling is when the meanes and the working of them enters into the very Spirit and inmost affections of a man and this is onely by the Spirit of regeneration when God by his Spirit workes with the outward meanes in our calling Such a calling had Lidia Act. 16.14 while she heard Paul preach the Lord opened her heart c. The outward calling without this inward onely leaues vs without excuse and aggrauates our damnation oft-times in the Church visible the inward calling without the outward is auaileable to salvation as in the Church inuisible But both together are more comfortable and effectuall as in the liuing members of the Church visible Fourthly there is an effectuall and a not effectuall calling A calling effectuall is when the meanes of grace is both tendred powerfully vnto vs and when it is truly receiued and embraced and continued in vnto the end Math. 9.9 there was an effectuall calling when as our Sauiour called Matthew and hee arose presently and followed him and this calling is proper onely to the elect A not effectuall calling is when the meanes of grace which are able to saue vs are offered vnto vs of God but we doe not accept of them nor yeeld vnto them A calling may be not effectuall divers wayes as first wheÌ„ it is vtterly refused as it was amongst the Gadarens that desired Christ to depart from them Mat. 8.34 or secondly when it is deferred some will not vtterly refuse the meanes of grace but they will deferre them as Foelix that would heare Paul another time Act. 24.26 or thirdly when it is accepted to the halfes as it was with Agrippa Act. 26.28 thou hast perswaded me almost to become a Christian saith he to Paul or fourthly when it reduceth vs onely to some outward formall obedience without truth and singlenesse of heart And thus it was with the foolish Virgins Matth. 25.3 And thus it was also with Simon the Sorcerer Act. 8.13.21 hee made an outward profession of faith he beleeued and was baptised verse 13. but his heart was not right in the sight of God vers 21. Lastly or when it is not continued in to the end and thus it was with Demas 2. Tim. 4.10 that forsooke Religion and embraced this present world and these are in all the Reprobate yea many of them are in some of the elect for a time Proofes Now if wee vnderstand the Church in a large sence as it consists of all sorts good and bad it hath all these callings in it But if we speake of it in a restrained sence as it consists onely of the elect then it is not subiect to the not effectuall calling To come to the note All that are of the Church are called of God to the obedience of his will here are three things to be considered First they are called there is the worke secondly they are called of God there is the Author of the worke And thirdly to the obedience of his will there is the end of the worke First the Church of God is called for so the Apostle 1. Cor. 1.2 speaking of the Church calls them Saints by calling or as it is in the originall called Saints and Rom 8 28. called of his purpose Act. 2.39 euen as many as the Lord God shall call that is his whole Church Rom. 8.30 whom he predestinate them also hee called So yee see the Church is a called company now whether God deale mildly or roughly drawing vs or leading vs yet still it is a calling the worke is the same Secondly the Author of this calling that is God 1. Cor. 1.9 God is faithfull who hath called you and in this respect he is said to be the caller as it is in the originall Now whether God call immediatly by himselfe or by meanes whether the calling be outward or inward all is done by God the author is the same stil Thirdly the end of this calling is to the knowledge and obedience of Gods will 1. Thess 4.7 God hath not called vs to uncleannesse but to â—sse Now holinesse consists in knowledge and obedience It is true that the furthest end of our calling is to be made partakers of his glory but the immediate end of our calling is to vertue grace as they are ioyned in the 2. Pet 1.3 through the acknowledgement of him that hath called vs to glory and vertue and hence it is that our whole state and profession is called our calling as in Eph. 4.1 walke worthy of the vocation whereunto yee were called yea for this end it is called an holy calling 2 Tim. 1.9 and it is so called first in respect of the caller who is holy secondly in respect of the worke our calling which is holy Thirdly in respect of the meanes which are hoâ—y â—ourthly in respect of the end we are called to which is holinesse Fifthly in respect of the effect which is holy those that are truly and effectually called being by that calling changed and made holy Saints Obiect But some may except and say are not some of the Elect yet vncalled and yet they are of the Church too Answ I answer they are of the Church in Gods purpose and acceptance but they are not so in the eyes of men no nor yet in their owne apprehensions till they haue a calling which they are sure to haue one time or other first or last The Reasons of the pâ—int are these Reason 1 First that we should be of the Church of God and professe his seruice and worship this is anothers businesse not our owne nay it is Gods businesse not mans and therefore we must not thrust our selues into it but we must haue a vocation and calling to it and that from God Matth. 20. from 1. to 7. verse they that goe into the vineyard must be hired and who shall hire and bid them goe but the master of the Vineyard Now Gods Church is the Vineyard and God is the Master and therefore none can call but hee In Matth. 22.2.3 c. the wedding is prepared the Ghests must come but first they must be bidden and called and by whom must they be called and bidden but by the Bridegroomes Father euen God himselfe that makes the Feast for that is meant by the Parable God the Father marrieth vs to his Son Christ he prouides ioy and peace of Conscience for vs which is
refuse to come No let vs be thankefull for it it is a pretious Iewell and let vs take heed we doe not relinquish our Calling let vs not looke backe for no man that putteth his hand to the Plough and looketh backe is fit for the Kingdome of God Vse 4 Fourthly by this we may know whether wee are of the Church of God or no. Euery one that liues in the Church pretends to be of the Church but here is the tryall Art thou called Yes Why then thou art of the Church in some sense so farre as thou art called so farre thou art of the Church If thou hast onely an outward calling thou art but an outward member but if thou haue an inward and effectuall calling then thou art a true and liuing member of it But you will say how shall I know whether I haue this effectuall calling or not I answer It is easie to know it doest thou finde Gods Spirit worke effectually in thee to cause thee to leaue thy sins to stirre thee vp to repentance and to faith and to doe good workes As thou hast a new name so hast thou by this calling a new heart and a new life and new motions and affections new courses If thou hast then thy calling is effectual else it is but a dreame The surest marke of all is thy Conscience Doth that check thee for euery knowne sinne and infirmitie And doest thou labour in truth to obey it and renounce and ouercome that sinne thy Conscience checks thee for This is the surest mark of an effectuall Calling For when the Spirit hath thus quickned and purged thee and doth instruct thee and deale effectually with thy Conscience and frames thee to obedience to it here is a sure marke of an effectuall calling If we flee the Corruptions that are in the world through lust and if we giue our selues diligently to a course of grace and sanctification if we ioyne with our vertue faith c. this makes our calling sure and our Election too 2. Pet. 1.5 9 10. And if we doe these things we shall neuer fall Vse 5 The last vse is matter of reproofe or confutation of such as deny vs and the Church wherein wee liue to be a true Church We haue a true calling and that from God to sanctification by the Word and Sacraments and by the Spirit therefore we are a true Church This they cannot deny Ainsworth and others amongst themselues confesse that they had their Calling here yea their effectuall Calling and they will not say but theirs is a true Calling therefore so is ours and so our Church a true Church Yea but say they this calling is extraordinary I answer What is extraordinary in it The meanes are ordinary as the Word preached read and conferred on the Sacraments administred and Prayers offered vp to God It is extraordinary when wee are called without meanes or by rare and strange meanes but the meanes here are ordinary therefore the calling is so too Besides many thousands in our Church haue a true and effectuall Calling The meanes is dailie powerfull through Gods mercy either to winne or to confirme not a few but many thousands therefore the commonnesse of it proues it to be ordinary Yea but say they It is so in the Church of Rome too many are called there and yet that is no true Church It is strange that they will blind themselues so wilfully and not discerne betwixt things that so notoriously differ For first in the Church of Rome few or none are conuerted here in our Church are many Secondly they haue onely a generall call to a confused notice of God wee to the particular and precise knowledge of every Article and Point of Religion needfull to saluation Thirdly they haue not the meanes the Word truly preached nor read in a knowne Tongue wee haue Therefore it is strange that they should once open their mouthes to make such an absurd comparison The second Lecture of the Church NOw in the second place wee are to speake of the titles giuen to the Church there is no great difference betwixt the name and the title of a thing for sometime the name is called the title and the title the name yet as it is with persons of great place and qualitie they haue their names and their titles too as Paul an Apostle of Iesus Christ c. Paul there is his name an Apostle c. there is his title and so it is generally with all things of any great note they haue their names whereby they are ordinarily called and their titles whereby some extraordinary or speciall matter is attributed to them and affirmed of them So in the matter in hand concerning the Saints or company of the faithfull the name Church doth propound them barely or simply to our vnderstanding The titles raise vs vp to the consideration of some further matter in the nature and state of the Church then the name doth import and therefore hauing spoken of the name now we are to speake of the titles of the Church There are many worthy and goodly titles ascribed to the Church as it is said Psalm 87.3 Goodly and glorious things are spoken of thee Oh Citie of God Many as being much variety of matter to be considered in the estate of the Church and glorious as euery title commending the grace beauty and glory of the Church after a speciall manner And the Lord doth adorne her with these many glorious titles for many causes As first to giue vs a more full and perfit view of the whole Doctrine concerning the Church no one title is able to expresse all the particulars that concerne the Church therefore the Lord vseth many that what is wanting in some may be supplied by the rest Secondly that he might expresse and set forth the greatnesse of his loue to his Church which being infinite and extended in many excellent kinds requires many and glorious titles to expresse it by It is true that none indeed though neuer so many and glorious can expresse it according to the measure of his loue but these that wee haue doe fully expresse it according to the measure of our capacity so farre as we are able and as it is fit for vs to vnderstand Thirdly because by these many glorious titles giuen to the Church the Lord would inamour vs with her loue and allure vs to her communion that wee may the more willingly and chearefully be associated and gathered vnto her and the more sweetly and comfortably repose our selues in her bosome when wee heare so many and so glorious things spoken of her I cannot relate much lesse handle all the titles affirmed of the Church only I will reduce them to certaine heads and cull forth the choise of them out of each Testament They are of two sorts First some are absolute that concerne the Church simply in it selfe Secondly some are not so absolute but respectiue which concerne the Church as iâ—
it is holy thirdly that it is Catholike so it is said in expresse words Fourthly that they are ioyned to Christ And fiftly that they haue a Communion amongst themselues both these are intended where it is said they are a Communion of Saints sixtly and lastly that they are knowne onely to God and themselues and this is intended when it is said I beleeue it Wee haue past through two of these adiuncts for so I call them first that the Church is one and secondly that it is holy now we are to come to the third Adiunct Catholike The Church of God is Catholike In handling of this Point wee will first shew how this word Catholike hath been wronged secondly wee will right it and thirdly we will draw such obseruations from thence as it will fitly minister First it hath been much wronged for many hundred yeeres and that by many First by those in the Romish Church Secondly by some of our owne Church First it hath been wronged and corrupted exceedingly by those of the Romish Church and that in these respects first in that they falsly challenge it and appropriate it to themselues alone Secondly in that they boast of it as their Crowne and glory Thirdly in that they put their confidence in it that because they haue this name therefore they are vndoubtedly the true Church and in certaine state of saluation First the word is wronged in that they of the Romish Church do falsly challeng and appropriate it to themselues as if their Church were Catholike and none else and as if their faith were Catholike and none other and as if they were the onely Catholikes and none but they If they were Catholikes as they pretend to bee yet they might giue others leaue to be called so as well as they but they are not so onely the name of Catholikes is falsely arrogated to themselues and flatteringly yeelded vnto them by their friends and fellowes but indeed and in Truth they are no Catholikes at all Secondly it is wronged by them in that they boast and vaunt themselues of it as their Crowne and glory and they take it in great snuffe if they be not so called yea if you call them Papists or such other like name I know it by experience they wil be ready to fly in your face Surely it is a glory to those of whom it is truly affirmed yet it is not in that case to be boasted of but quietly and soberly to be inioyed Gods best graces in vs are not vainely to be boasted of much lesse any outward names which are but cast vpon vs least of all such as we take vpon our selues without desert Thirdly they wrong it in that they put much confidence in this name that because they are so called therefore saith Bristow and the Rhemists wee are the vndoubtedly true Church in certaine state of saluation for this is one of the Pillars of Popery the very names of the Church and Catholike they are the two pillars that Popery builds vpon But it is to be considered that the name makes not the man to be such as he is called but on the contrary because a man is such an one as the name imports therefore hee is so called As for example A Father or a Master is not such an one because he is so called but because hee is a Father or a Master therefore he is called so Therefore we must first examine our selues whether we are such as the name imports and then we may haue Comfort in our States whether we bee so named or not if the name be vpon vs without cause we are nothing the neerer to saluation If it be on vs vpon good cause then we may haue comfort in our state not for the name but because we are such as the name signifies so that the name is no way any matter of confidence to build our saluation on In the second place it is somewhat wronged by some amongst vs too not that wee either mistake it as the Papists doe nor maligne it as they say we doe but occasionally by their errour on the one side wee run into another on the otherside because they aduance it too high we debase it too low First some labouring to suppresse the name quite as certaine Lutherans that haue changed Catholike in the Creed into Christian Secondly others scoffing at it as a toy and a Iest Thirdly others that in the heate of their spirits and pregnancy of their wit doe depraue it and make a nickname of it cacolicke cartholike but these are distempered spirits not seasoned with grace and modesty as it were to bee wished Fourthly and lastly generally all of vs little regarding it nor hauing it in that good request as it well deserues It is true that the name of Christian is farre more ancient and proper and more warrantable as we may see in Act. 11.26 they of the Church of Antioch were first called Christians yet let not this name be supprest for to be called Catholikes hath been a matter of long continuance and vnderstanding it for the members of the Catholike Church it is a reuerent and an honourable stile Thus we see how this name hath been wronged first by them of the Romish Church secondly by some amongst vs. Now secondly we are to right the Word and restore it to the originall sense that so we may frame vs to a reuerent and sober estimation of it and neither esteeme of it too much nor too little and to this end first therefore wee will consider of the antiquitie of the Word secondly wee will shew the right meaning of it and thirdly the common receiued vse of it First consider the antiquitie of it this word is not found in any of the bookes of Scripture onely it is found in the preface of the Epistles of Iames Peter Iohn and Iude there they are called Catholike Epistles which is a Greeke word and signifies generall which prefaces whether they bee Scripture or not is vncertaine they may bee so and they may not yet certaine it is that the name is very ancient But come to the Creed and there this word is plainely found and that as an adiunct of the Church I cannot say that it was the Apostles owne doing but surely it was very neere to the Apostles times So likewise it is found in the Nicene Creed and also in Athanasius Creed and there hee applies it to the Faith The Faith professed by the Catholike Church is the Catholike Faith So wee see that the word is very ancient Secondly to right it we are to consider the right meaning of the word Catholike which is generall or vniuersall for so the Ancients expound the Prefaces to the generall Epistle of Peter and the generall Epistle of Iames as directed not to any particular Nation or Citie as Paul did his Epistle to the Romanes but generally and vniuersally to all the faithfull or to
12.11 Therefore as we looke to bee partakers with Christ in his glory so let vs partake with him in his afflictions and these afflictions shall tend to our greater glory Lastly here is matter of Comfort to vs in our hearing Vse 5 Reading and Repeating of Gods Word and in our prayers and all other our good endeauours because Christ Communicates with vs in them helping directing and quickning vs in the performance of them couering the infirmities of them dignifying presenting and making them acceptable before God Here likewise is comfort to vs in all our sufferings What if we suffer persecution and affliction Let vs know that Christ partakes in them and therefore they are sanctified vnto vs and also they are regarded of God with commiseration as the sufferings of Christ and they are already ouercome by his sufferings and therefore seeing they are regarded of God as the sufferings of Christ Act. 9.4 Saul Saul why persecutest thou me saith our Sauiour and seeing he doth so pitie vs in them how can wee but looke for a good end of them Let vs therefore comfortably suffer with Christ bearing his markes vpon vs here that so we may Reigne with him in glory hereafter The sixth Lecture of the Church THe fourth qualitie whereby the Church is described in that Article of the Creed concerning the Church is that it is called a communion of Saints which carries a double sense and imports a double communion one with Christ the Head the other with the members Of that which passeth betwixt the members and Christ the Head you haue heard already now in the next place wee are to speake of the communion the members haue one with another It is here aduisedly to bee recalled to minde what Church it is that we here speake of that is the Church of chosen men both in heauen and earth for so it was propounded to be spoken to in the entrance vpon this Point and secondly euery one of these sixe adiuncts in that Article of the Creed concerning the Church agreeth to each both to the chosen men in heauen as well as to the chosen men on earth For first the Church of chosen men in heauen is one with that on earth secondly they are holy also though not in a truer sense yet in a higher degree for they haue attained to the perfection of that holinesse which these on earth haue but in a small measure Thirdly they are Catholike too as well as we consisting of all Nations People and Kinreds as Reuel 7.9 Fourthly they in heauen haue a communion with Christ their Head as well as we on earth and that in a more speciall manner then we haue for Christ is present with them not onely by his Spirit as hee is with vs but also hee is bodily present with them which wee doe not yet enioy therefore they haue a more speciall communion with him then wee yet haue Fifthly they haue a communion with vs and wee with them so farre as is agreeing and fitting to both our estates Sixthly they also are knowne onely to God and to themselues and not certainly to any else and this also in a further sense to them then to vs because they know it not onely particularly euery one of himselfe as we doe but generally they know that all there amongst them are members which amongst vs is nothing so wee know but euery one for himselfe to be a member So we see that these sixe adiuncts agree to the Church of chosen men in heauen as well as on earth yea further most of these agree to the elect Angels too for they haue an vnitie amongst themselues and so are one also they are holy and so like wise they hauing Christ to be their Head as we haue no doubt but they haue a communion with Christ and Christ with them and when our Sauiour saith Luk. 15.10 that they reioyce ouer a sinner that is conuerted it is plaine that they haue a communion with vs also But because the Article saith a communion of Saints not of Angels therfore we will restraine it to holy men and not extend it to the holy Angels And further we must vnderstand that howsoeuer all these may bee truly affirmed of the Saints in heauen as well as on earth yet because they are more sensible in earthly Saints then in heauenly therefore they are most vsually affirmed and generally vnderstood of those on earth These things thus premised to set the article vpright in its own due sense and vnderstanding specially in this fifth adiunct because we shall haue speciall vse of it wee proceede now to the Point We will draw it into an Obseruation and that is this Doctr. The whole Church of God and all the parts and members of it haue a mutuall Communion and fellowship one with another For proofe of this point I will omit such places that proue both this and the former Communion as Rom. 12.5 and 1. Ioh. 1.3 and I will come to such particular places as proue this point Psal 122.3 Ierusalem is built as a City that is compact together in it selfe Wee must vnderstand that Dauid speakes here as a Prophet and vnder the Law somewhat darkely and vnder a shadow The substance is this the Citie is the Church of God Ierusalem the spirituall and heauenly Ierusalem the building that is the laying together of these liuing stones that is the faithfull into this liuing Church compact together c. there is the fellowship that they haue and do exercise one towards another So that the meaning is this The whole Church of God is a liuing Citie consisting of liuing stones and they are compact together they doe yeeld mutually that helpe and good one to another which they can And so is this shadow plainely now reuealed vnder the light of the Gospell as wee may see Ephes 2.21 22. In whom all the building coupled together groweth vnto an holy Temple in the Lord. In whom yee also are built together to bee the habitation of God by the Spirit All the building that is the whole company of the faithfull are coupled together that is fast linked and ioyned together one with another in goodly order and proportion groweth to an holy Temple that is make vp one Church or Temple not materiall but spirituall as Vers 22. for God to dwell in by his Spirit and this the Ephesians particularly had experience in In whom yee also are built together to be the habitation of God by the Spirit And 1. Iohn 1.7 If we walke in the light as hee is in the light we haue fellowship one with another Here this Communion is in plaine termes named and expressed Who are they that walke in the light but the faithfull onely that are in Christ Who is the light of the World Whosoeuer are such there is a mutuall fellowship and Communion betwixt them The Point is large and therefore requires a large explication and also it is a Point
the Apostle teacheth vs Gal. 6.10 Doe good to all especially to the Houshold of faith Likewise it teacheth vs to separate our selues from all prophane and wicked men 2. Cor. 6.17 Come out from amongst them and separate your selues saith the Lord and touch none vncleane thing c. Lastly this may serue to controule the pride of the Romish Vse 6 Antichrist who regards not the saints but as his slaues he will not vse them as fellowes in a holy Communion this shewes him to bee Antichrist hee will bee the head of the Saints he will blesse all none must blesse him this is abominable pride and insolency not to be spoken of The seuenth Lecture of the Church WHereas the Argument wee treate of is the Church we turned aside to expound the Article in the Creede which concernes the Church I beleeue the holy Catholike Church the Communion of Saints and there as you haue heard we found sixe Adiuncts or Epithites that the Church is qualified withall First that it is one secondly that it is holy thirdly Catholike fourthly that they haue a Communion with Christ fiftly that they haue a Communion one with another Sixtly and lastly that they are knowne onely to God and themselues The fiue former are plainely laid downe in the Article of which you haue also heatd The sixth and last whereof we are now to speake is not plainely laid downe but yet it is directly implyed in the words for if you aske me how this clause growes from the Article I answer Because it is said I beleeue the Church c. Now if it were a knowne manifest thing to the eye and to the outward sense then it were not so properly said to be beleeued for faith is of things not seene Heb. 11.1 Doctr. Wee will make it plaine by an Obseruation and that is this That the faithfull the true Church are knowne to none but to God themselues You must vnderstand that their persons are to be taken Notice of as well as the persons of other men and likewise their profession is to bee seene as well as the the professions of other men yea but their sauing graces whereby they are made members of the true Church are not certainely knowne but to God and themselues You see how the Note stands first they are knowne to God secondly they are knowne to themselues thirdly they are knowne to none but God and themselues First God knowes them Mala. 3.16 God hath a book of Remembrance written before him of those that are his Iohn 10.14 I know mine saith our Sauiour And in Ioh. 13.18 he saith I know whom I haue chosen 2. Tim. 2.19 The Lord knoweth who are his This the Apostle referres to Gods own secret Counsell to know who are his Reuel 3.1 4. The Lord saith to the Church of Sardy I know thy workes for thou hast a name that thou liuest but art dead and Verse 4. Thou hast a few names yet in Sardy which haue not defiled their Garments c. so that they are knowne to God by name thou hast a few names in Sardy c. Secondly they are knowne to themselues 1. Ioh. 3.14.19 We know we are translated from death to life because wee loue the brethren and we know that we are of the Truth and shall before him assure our hearts And 1. Ioh. 4.13 16. Hereby we know that we dwell in him and he in vs because hee hath giuen vs of his Spirit and we haue knowne and beleeued the loue that God hath in vs. Here you must not vnderstand it as if they did certainely know each other to be so as that I should know you or you me certainely to bee of this number but that all know the nature of their state and particularly euery one of their owne Consciences assure them that they for their parts are of it Thirdly none but God and they know it Rom. 2.28 29. Reuel 2.17 He is not a Iew which is one outward neither is that Circumcision which is outward in the flesh But he is a Iew which is one within and the Circumcision is of the heart in the spirit Here is a plaine exception against all outward shewes and testifications whatsoeuer as altogether insufficient to make any certaine proofe to the world who are the true Circumcision and Iewes indeede that is who are truly sanctified and right members of the Church and it is restrained to the heart which God alone and themselues know It is as much as if he had expressely said They are onely knowne to God and to themselues 1. King 19.10 18. compared with Rom. 11.3 4. the Prophet Heliah complaines that hee was left alone he saw no Church at that time and yet the holy Ghost saith that there were then seuen thousand which had not bowed their knee to Baal If any could haue discernd them then the Prophet might that was their Teacher but he knew no such no nor scarce any that profest to be such therefore onely God and themselues knew it So much for the proofe of the Point The Reasons are these First that whereby they are Reas 1 knowne to men that is their profession is common to Hyprocrites as well as to them for Hypocrites may goe as farre in shew of grace as the best therefore they can bee knowne to none but God and themselues Secondly that whereby true Beleeuers are distinguished Reas 2 from Hypocrites that is the Truth of their hearts and their inward affections cannot be seene by men for the faithfull may fall as low in Sinne to the eye of the world as the wicked and yet haue truth in their hearts still but none knowes the heart but God and themselues therefore none knowes this who are true Beleeuers but God and themselues Thirdly Sinne is a secret thing in an Hypocrite and therfore Reas 3 he may beare a shew of Religion and yet harbour secretly some sinne that may vtterly cut him off from the estate of Grace therefore none can know who is Gods but God and themselues Fourthly there are certaine inward graces in the heart Reas 4 which cannot outwardly be discerned as faith and Repentance especially Gods loue and fauour to a man and the forgiuenesse of his sinnes is a close Secret not to bee discerned outwadly onely these are knowne to God that gaue them and to them that haue them Reu. 2.17 The vses are these first this serues to refute those that hold this opinion that we that are of the Church may know others to be so too and that take vpon them to affirme that such and such shal be saued Where God hath said it wee may boldly affirme it too as of Dauid Abraham Peter Paul c. but wee must meddle no further leaue the rest to God we may say of others that wee are perswaded that they are Gods but wee cannot say that we know it to be so Ioh. 21.21 22. when Peter would inquire of another what he should doe Our
Sauiour answers him What is that to thee follow thou mee For the exceptions made out of 1. Ioh. 3.10 where the children of God are said to bee knowne and the children of the Diuell Whosoeuer doth not righteousnesse is not of God c. And that in the 2. Ioh. 1. where the Apostle calles the Lady he wrote to Elect Lady And in the 1. Thess 1.4 knowing beloued saith the Apostle that ye are Elect of God These and such like places are thus answered that either this is spoken out of a Charitable perswasion or else it is spoken so of all because some are so for that seemeth to be the case 1. Thes 1.4 or if he had any certaine knowledge of any particulars it was by diuine Reuelation wee cannot say therefore out of a certaine knowledge that any particular man is a true member of the Church Onely this we may say that we are perswaded vpon good grounds he is so Vse 2 Secondly the Papists are here refuted for they sinne horribly in this kind in that they pray to such and such particular persons as Saints whereas many of them it is to bee feared are damned Spirits in Hell for false Teachers may be knowne by their fruits Matth. 7.19.20 Againe this refutes three other errors of Popery that do directly contradict these three branches of the Obseruation First they make Predestination to be contingent and so they say God himselfe doth not precisely know who are his for if Predestination do depend vpon mans will that if man will he shal be saued then God knows nothing till he see what man wil doe Secondly they deny certainety of saluation and so the faithfull themselues cannot know themselues to be Gods they will haue no man say certainely of himselfe that hee shal be saued and yet they will say it of others that they are saued And that is the third error which contradicts the third branch of this Obseruation in that they say the Church is alwaies visible and so generally others may know who are true members of the Church as well as themselues But we see all these errors are here refuted by this Doctrine wherein we haue taught and proued that the faithfull are onely knowne to God and themselues and to none other But if any man aske me How then shall wee loue one another and do good one to another as Brethren if we know not who are Brethren I answer we must perswade our selues of others that they are Gods vpon good grounds and good hope because wee see the fruits of faith and Repentance and loue in them so farre as can outwardly be discerned therefore we must be perswaded they are Gods and so we must loue them and doe good to them as Brethren The third Vse teacheth vs that if euery one may know Vse 3 himselfe to be Gods then euery one of vs should labour to learne this and know it for himselfe But you will say how shall we know this I answer by a due examination of thy selfe whether thou hast Gods Spirit the Spirit of Adoption which maketh vs to cry Abba Father that is which maketh vs go to God as to our father and to call vpon him as our father for that same Spirit beareth witnes to our Spirits that we are the Children of God Rom. 8.15 16. And in the 1. Cor. 2.11 12. What man saith the Apostle knoweth the things of man saue the Spirit that is in man euen so the things of God knoweth no man but the Spirit of God now we haue receiued not the Spirit of the world but the Spirit which is of God that we might know the things that are giuen vs of God The Apostle saith no man knowes the things of God that is the secrets of God but the Spirit of God Now this is one of Gods secrets to know whether we are Gods therefore hauing this Spirit wee may know our selues to bee Gods And that wee may further seale this vnto our selues let vs labour to make our Election sure vnto our selues by walking in good workes striuing against sin and working the workes of Holinesse and Righteousnesse and obedience to God which are the fruits of the Spirit of God and so shall we assure our hearts that we are Gods And so much be spoken of this last Adiunct and also of the Article Now wee come to the fourth generall Head propounded to be handled in the Doctrine of the Church and that is the diuision of the Church Now the diuision of the Church is partly of the name and partly of the thing it selfe First of the name The name is doubtfull and carries many significations yea and many contrary significations and therefore is to be diuided accordingly In the largest sense it may be applyed to any multitude or company of people whatsoeuer whether in case of Religion or not in case of Religion and the originall word both Hebrew and Greeke in the old and new Testament will beare it In the old Testament Ezek. 32.22 there the name is applyed to Ashur and his company to a company of men not in case of Religion And the same is applied Deut. 33.4 in case of Religion to the Congregation of Iacob that is to the Church of God Nay further that name is extended to those that maliciously oppose the Church of God and oppose Religion Psalm 26.5 I haue hated the assembly or Church of the wicked So that the Hebrew word in the old and new Testament beares it as well for a company not in case of Religion as for a company in case of Religion So likewise the Greeke word Ecclesia in the new Testament beares it in this generall sense as Act. 19.32 where it is applied to a disordered assembly in a case of mutiny The assembly that is the Church was out of order And in the Act. 2.47 the same word is applied to the company of Beleeuers that is to the Church of God The Lord added to the Church So wee see how this word hath been applied in the old and new Testaments to any multitude or company of people whatsoeuer either in case or not in case of Religion Yea but yet it is restrained in ordinary vse of speech and so hath been for many yeeres vnto a company of people as professing some certaine Religion whatsoeuer Religion it bee the Church is accordingly so called for there is a true Religion and euery Church that imbraceth that Religion is a true Church And againe there are false Religions and they that embrace any of them are false Churches so euery Church receiueth her denomination from the Religion she embraceth As for example we call those Iewes which are borne Iewes but those onely are of the Iewish Church which embrace the Iewish religion so that if a Iew borne doe embrace the Christian religion he is not of the Iewish Church though he be of the Iewish Nation yet he is of the Christian Church So likewise if a man bee a
Christian borne and yet ioyne with the Iewish Church in their religion hee is not of the Christian but of the Iewish Church and so it is of all others So then the name of Church and Religion are in some sense yoke-fellowes all Churches receiuing denomination from the Religion they professe Now then Religion being as the forme of the Church giuing it name and being therefore looke what Religion it is that the Church professeth and such is the Church to bee reputed There is a true Religion and euery Church embracing and professing the same is to bee reputed a true Church as the reformed Churches There are many false Religions and euery Church professing such Religion are false Churches as the Churches of the Heathen that worship false Gods and so embrace false Religions And so the Churches of the Saracens that erect and set vp Mahomet against Christ and of the Iewes that deny the comming of the Messiah in the flesh are false Churches But there are some Churches that embrace party Religions in part true and in part false yea what Church is so pure that is not tainted with some error and what Church is there so impure that professeth not some notable heauenly Truths We must therefore consider what truths and what errors they hold and so the truth will bee soone decided Without Christ there is no saluation and so no true Church 1. Ioh. 5.12 He that hath the Sonne hath life and he that hath not the Sonne of God hath not life If yee aske me whether one and the same Church may not bee a true Church in respect of some in it professing the truth or in respect of some fundamentall truths professed in it and yet a false Church in respect of some professing falshood in it or in respect of some fundamentall truths ouerthrowne in it I answer Surely it may till such time as the false Church hath gotten the vpper-hand and makes lawes for her errors and against the others truths with sentence of abandoning all those out of their Church which doe hold the truths So it was with the Church of Rome before the Councell of Trent And thus it was with the Church of Sardy Reuel 3.1 4. she had a name to liue but was dead and yet in the fourth Verse the Lord saith He hath a few names in Sardy c. Therefore take this for a Rule Whatsoeuer Church embraceth Christ Iesus God and Man the onely meanes of saluation is a true Church though tainted with many errors besides and on the contrary whatsoeuer Church beleeueth not this is a false Church though it hold many other excellent truths besides So much of the diuision of the name of the Church Now wee come to speake of the diuision of the thing it selfe that is of Gods Church which is not so to be vnderstood as if God had so many seuerall kinds of Churches for the Church as I haue shewed before is one and the same from the beginning of the world to the end that Church of God which was in the beginning and remaines now and shall continue to the worlds end is but one and the same Church therefore when we mention the diuision of the Church it selfe we meane not that it is seuerally diuided into diuers and seuerall kinds but distinguished in it selfe in diuers and sundry respects and principally for these first in respect of the bounds and limits or compasse of it secondly in respect of the seuerall portions belonging to it in the seuerall estates that it is ordained vnto thirdly in respect of the outward state of it to the world sometimes knowne sometimes vnknowne First it is distinguished in it self in respect of the bounds and compasse of it and so it is either vniuersal or particular vniuersall that is the whole company of Gods chosen both in heauen an earth But this hath no limits but is dispersed farre and wide ouer the face of the whole earth and reacheth to heauen it selfe But because I haue spoken of this before both in the Adiunct Catholike and also in handling the generall nature of the Church therefore I will trust your memories for that Point and not speake more here of it In the next place a particular Church that is euery particular company of the faithful or at least of those that are called to the profession of the faith which being seuerall by themselues of seuerall times and places are but particular Churches But because wee shall speake more properly of this when wee come to speake of the visible Church therefore we will respit it till then Secondly it is distinguished in it selfe in respect of the seuerall portions that belong vnto it in the seuerall states that it is ordained to and they are two The first is on earth or in this life and that is a fighting or warfare and the second is in heauen in the life to come crowned and triumphing And accordingly the Church is diuided into the Church Militant and the Church Triumphant To begin with the first the Church Militant is the Congregation of the faithfull on earth that doe continually exercise a spirituall warfare against sinne and Satan and all the aduersaries of God and of his Religion Marke the parts of the definition I say it is a Congregation of the faithfull that doe thus fight for though Hypocrites and sometimes those that doe persecute the Gospell doe fight the Lords Battels and so in a generall sense may be reputed parts of this Militant Church yet that is but colourably and outwardly for some sinister respect not in truth and singlenesse of heart nor in true hatred of sinne nor in a true desire to obey God and to aduance his Kingdome and glory And therefore to speake properly none are true parts of this Church Militant but the faithfull onely Secondly I say it is a spirituall warfare and that in many respects First it is spiritual in respect of the end of it for though sometimes the aduersaries of the faithfull oppugne them in their bodies and outward states yet it is meerely in a spiritual respect either directly or indirectly to hurt their spiritual estate or life of Grace so likewise when the faithfull defend their bodies or outward estate against their aduersaries when they maintaine their reputations or their liues it is not so much for the thing it selfe as to defend and maintaine our spirituall estates Secondly it is spirituall in respect of the weapons that are vsed in this fight for they are chiefely spirituall on both parts the aduersaries weapons are temptations c. the faithfull their weapons are the whole Armour of God Thirdly it is spirituall in regard of the Generals of the Field on both sides which are Spirits Gods good Spirit on the side of the faithfull and Satan and spirituall wickednesses on the wickeds side The third thing in the note is this that this warfare must be exercised continually for the enuious man
sleepes not Mat. 13. he and his are alwaies vp in armes against vs therefore we must be so against them And take this for a Rule that looke whensoeuer wee intermit out fight wee doe so farre forth for the time suffer our selues to bee ouercome if once wee start aside the enemy gets the more vantage of vs. Lastly it is generall against all the aduersaries of God and of his Religion for Satan and all his forces bend themselues against God and against his Church and therefore the faithfull must bend all their forces against Satan and all the aduersaries of Gods Church God promised to Abraham Gen. 12.3 that he would blesse them that blesse him and curse them that curse him And so must all Abrahams seed the faithfull doe for God as they must loue all that loue God so they must fight against all that fight against God A question may be demanded here Whether the good Angels be not also parts of this Church Militant I answer They are parties in this businesse in some sense for though the enemies cannot annoy them and therefore they need not neither doe they fight for themselues yet doe they fight for vs as true guardians and assistants and as Gods Instruments and Messengers to succour vs or to disclose and destroy our enemies and their enterprises against vs. They are heauenly Souldiers not onely in generall as the Starres and all the Hoast of Heauen are but in particular assisting vs in our spirituall warfare and that personally and by their office they comfort vs in our temptations as they did our Sauiour Christ Matth. 4.11 after his temptation And so Luk. 22.43 they comforted Christ in his agony there appeared an Angell from heauen comforting him And Psal 34.7 the Angels are said to pitch their tents round about them that feare God So that the Angels are not only about vs but they pitch their tents about vs to fight for vs and they do also deliuer vs. So then in some sense they are parties in this warfare yea but yet because they are out of the danger of the enemies that they cannot annoy them therefore they cannot properly bee said to be any part of the militant Church Secondly the Church Triumphant what is that That is the Congregation of Saints in heauen that haue already finished their warfare and ouercome their enemies and do now raigne and triumph in glory together with Iesus Christ in his Kingdome But because I haue spoken of this Point before therefore I will not now stand vpon it onely we will here shew some differences betwixt the Church Militant and the Church Triumphant and so come to an obseruation arising from hence The differences are these following The Church Militant The Church Triumphant 1. The Church Militant is of Men onely 1. The Church Triumphant is of Angels too 2. The Church Militant is on earth 2. The Church Triumphant is in heauen 3. The Church Militant is subiect to sinne error and misery 3. The Church Triumphant is free from them all 4. The Church Militant is running in the race 4. The Church Triumphant hath attained the Goale 5. The Church Militant are Saints in hope 5. The Church Triumphant are Saints in possession 6. The Church Militant hath need of the meanes the Word and the Sacraments c. 6. The Church Triumphant hath attained to her perfection and end 7. The Church Militant children vnder yeeres heires by promise 7. The Church triumphant are of full age seized on their inheritance 8. The Church Militant is like Christ crucified concerning infirmitie 8. The Church Triumphant is like Christ exalted and inuested into glory Doctr. The Obseruation from hence is this That seeing there is first here a Church Militant on earth and then a Church Triumphant in heauen hence I say ariseth this Obseruation That none can euer come to be members of the Triumphant Church in heauen except first they bee members of the Militant and fighting Church on earth This was figured in the passage of Israel out of Egypt into Canaan they must incounter with Pharaoh and his Hoast they must passe through the Red Sea they must wander in the Wildernesse many yeeres and sustaine hunger and thirst they must warre with their enemies euen whole Nations by the way All this they must doe before they can enter into this earthly Canaan euen so it is with vs in our passage to the heauenly Canaan We must meet with many enemies and sustaine and vndergoe many miseries as the Apostle saith Through many afflictions wee must enter into the Kingdome of heauen Act. 14.12 What are afflictions but assaults troubles temptations and fights Why through these wee must enter and through many of these saith the Apostle we shall meet with many of them here in this life yea we must passe through them saith the Apostle there is a necessitie of it it is vnauoidable The end we seeke after is Gods Kingdome why this is the way thither saith the Apostle these are the Pikes you must passe through euen many afflictions So in the 2. Tim. 3.12 the Apostle saith that all that will liue godly in Christ shall suffer persecution All those that looke to triumph in heauen must liue godly in Christ Iesus now all that will doe so shall suffer persecution whether they will or not 2. Cor. 4.17 For our light afflictions which are but for a moment cause vnto vs a farre more excellent and an eternall weight of glory not that our afflictions doe cause it by way of efficacy or merit for the Apostle saith Rom. 8.18 that the afflictions of this present life are not worthy of the glory which shall bee reuealed to vs. What is the meaning then of this place It must be vnderstood by way of order and consequence that afflictions must of necessity goe before or else the eternall weight of glory cannot follow after Reuelat. 2.10 Yee shall haue tribulation but bee thou faithfull vnto the death and I will giue thee the Crowne of life As if he should say Thou shalt haue trials and tribulations but be thou faithfull and fight and thou shalt haue the Crowne of life And the promise of life is restrained onely to those that ouercome Reuel 2.7 11 17. And hence it is that the whole course of the faithfull is called the Fight of Faith 1. Tim. 6.12 Fight the good fight of Faith lay hold on eternall life As who should say Whosoeuer thou art that hast faith fight for it or else thou shalt neuer lay hold on eternall life neuer receiue the end of thy faith which is the saluation of thy soule And Matth. 20.21 22. the Mother of Zebedeus children came to Christ and besought him that her two sonnes might sit one at his right hand and the other at his left in his Kingdome But Iesus answered and said Yee aske yee know not what Are yee able to drinke of the Cup that I shall drinke of c. that
Ephes 1.22 23. compared with 1. Cor. 12.27 Saints holy Catholike the Pillar of Truth c. these are principally affirmed of the Church inuisible but proportionally applyed to the Church visible the whole receiuing denomination of the better part Doctr. These things premised we come now to the Obseruation and that is this That the true Church of God is sometime brought into such straits that the outward face of it doth either not appeare at all or at least it doth very hardly appeare to the sight of the world I say the outward face of it doth hardly appeare for the inward graces of it are neuer seene as faith and election for the heart wherein these are cannot be discouered As these are alwayes inuisible so likewise the outward face of the Church is sometime hidden Againe I say it is so but sometime for sometime it is very plaine and apparant and glorious in the eye of the world We doe not here take vpon vs to prooue peremptorily that there is a time when there shall bee no visible and apparant Church in the World the World is large and many things are done in some places of the World that we neither doe nor can know and therefore in regard of vs we may say there is no such matter For the Point must stand thus That euen in those places and in such times where the Church is most likely to be as where the true Church hath lately been and where it hath flourished or where the best meanes are the Word and the Sacraments and the Ministry or where they professe to bee the true Church yet euen then and there the true Church may lie hidden and not bee outwardly discerned And so consequently if it may be in such a state in such places and at such times much more is it so at other places and times where there is no such probabilitie of a Church And this strikes home at the Papists that will haue the outward face of the true Church so notoriously apparant and visible to the world But as I haue shewed in such places and at such times where it hath been most like to haue been euen then and there the true Church may be hidden and not apparant to the World This I will prooue in the case of the Church of Israel in Elias time 1. King 19.10 where the Prophet complaines of such a scarcitie of the faithfull in his dayes as that hee saith be himselfe was left alone If there had been a Church any where in those times surely it should haue been in Israel where the best meanes were but there was no outward appearance of a Church and shall we thinke then it was any where else So likewise in the 2. Chron. 15.3 Israel had been for a long time without a true God without a Priest to teach without Law then they had no true visible Church of God amongst them And if it were not to bee found in Israel where should it be found The Papists will reply in Iudah if not with Israel Iudah preuailed against Israel because they stayed vpon the Lord God of their Fathers as wee may see in the 2. Chron. 13.18 Well yet they were bad enough too as wee may see in the 2. Chron. 14.3 5. they had their strange Gods and their Images and high places and Groues in all their Cities which Asa tooke away But yet if it were thus with Israel that they had no outward face of a true Church might it not be so with Iudah too and so in other Churches yea we will proue that it was so with Iudah afterward as we may see in the 2. Chron. 28.23 24.25 where it is said of Ahaz that he sacrificed to the gods of Damascus and to the gods of the King of Aram hee brake the vessels of the House of God shut vp the dores of the House of the Lord and made him Altars in euery corner of Ierusalem and in euery Citie of Iudah hee made high places to burne Incense to other Gods c. So Iudah was worse then Israel nay then the very Heathen that were before them as wee may see 2. Chron. 33.9 where it is said that Manasseh made Israel to erre and to doe worse then the Heathen whom the Lord had cast out before them So you see here was no outward face of a Church neither in Iudah nor in Israel if not in them where could there bee any Who could now point with his finger and say I know which is the true Church of God whereunto I may and must ioyne my selfe If it were so with them that were the naturall branches then there is no priuiledge for any other Church but that it may be so with them too But the Papists will obiect that this was so vnder the Law onely but it shall not bee so vnder the Gospell or if it bee so sometimes yet it shall not be so often to the end of the world I say I will proue that the state of the Church was so also vnder the Gospell and shall bee so not sometimes onely but often to the end of the world that there shall be no outward face of a true Church Reuel 12.6 14. the woman is said there to be fled into the wildernesse which is meant of the Church that at seuerall times to the worlds end shall bee driuen to liue in Desert and forlorne places how then shall men see it and take notice of it and ioyne with it when it is in such a secret place So in the Reuel 13.7 8. The Beast made warre with the Saints and ouercame them and power was giuen vnto him ouer euery Kindred and Nation and Tongue Therefore all that dwell vpon the earth worship him whose names are not written in the booke of life of the Lambe Where was the outward face of a Church in these times And in the 2. Thes 2.3 4 5. the Apostle sheweth that Antichrist shall come and sit in Gods Temple as God c. The Diuell shall bee so cunning that he shall set vp Antichrist in Gods Temple that is in Gods Church where there hath been an outward face of a Church continued for many yeeres and yet hee shall not be knowne but to be God but onely to those that are spiritually-minded for he shall sit as God so that then there shall be no outward face of a true Church there So likewise that in Luk. 18.8 proues this Point where our Sauiour saith When the Sonne of man commeth shall he find faith on the Earth If faith be so scarce to be found which is the life of the Church where then shall the Church be found But where shall hee not find faith In India or in Rome onely No not onely in one or two places but not in the earth And who shall not find it The Sonne of Man When the Sonne of Man commeth shall hee find faith on the earth Then the Church is not so palpable as that it may be
Bellarmine tendeth directly hereto and they labour to proue it with all their power and it stands them vpon for if this doth not stand the whole forme of their Church falls to the ground For whereas they say the true Church is alwaies notoriously visible and therefore their Church being so is the true Church We say and haue prooued that the true Church of God is sometime brought into such straights that the outward face thereof doth not at all or at least doth hardly appeare and therefore it will follow that if their Church haue and shall be alwayes notoriously visible then theirs is not the true Church Their exceptions bee of small moment if they be well considered I will stand but vpon two or three of the chiefe They alleage out of the fifth of Matthew and the fourteenth Verse That the Church is the light of the World now the light is alwaies seene therefore the Church is alwayes seene I answer This is spoken personally to the Disciples Ye are the light of the world and it is to be extended to the Ministers of the Gospell in regard of the Duty of Holinesse to be practised by them that they should not walke offensiuely to the World but rather to prouoke them to the practise of holinesse by the light of their good example How doth this serue then to proue the continual visiblenesse of the Church Besides I say that a Light may bee eclipsed for a time and yet be a Light still The Moone is a Light and yet not alwayes visible for sometimes it is eclipst and yet then it is as good a Light as when it is in her full brightnesse and therefore if this were to be vnderstood of the Church it doth not proue that it is alwaies visible because it is a Light Further I say that by that reason their life for that is as well if not chiefely vnderstood by the Light as vers 16. is also without error too as well as their Doctrine and that alwayes which is not so Lastly if it doe giue Light alwayes yet it is but to those that are in the house verse 15. that is to those that are members of the Church and that wee easily grant but what is this to proue the notorious visiblenesse of the Church to the world Secondly they alleage the eighteene of Matthew and the seuenteenth vers where our Sauiour saith Tell the Church and therefore there must bee alwayes a visible Church Marke saith Campian here is a remedy for a disease now the disease remaines alwaies and therefore the remedy must alwaies remaine I answer It is true it is a remedy for those that lie in such a state there spoken of and in some sense it is alwaies performed euen when two or three are ioyned together in the faith though there be no knowne visibility they may tell one another for it is not here meant that they shall appeale to Rome Their third exception is this but say they they that beleeue be they few or many must make profession of their faith else they cannot bee saued Rom. 10.10 now if they must alwayes make profession then they are alwaies seene and so the Church is alwayies visible I answer It is true they must professe alwaies and so they doe except it bee in time of their infirmity But must they do it to all the world No they may doe it among themselues alwayes though there bee but two or three of them yea and when they are many they may doe it to the eye of the World too if there bee no certaine danger in it yea though there be certaine danger in it yet if they haue a calling to it they are resolute euen to die for the profession of it and that is as much profession as is required And yet because their number is but few and that they liue in certaine places and are in this case for the most part obscure and simple men therefore it is not possible that any such generall notice should bee taken of them and those that doe heare of them or see them are vsually little mooued by their example at least they are seldome perswaded that they are the true Church and so ioyne with them Therefore there is no such perpetuall notorious visiblenesse of the Church as they would haue We will returne vpon them with these two Points and choke them with these two bones First wee aske them where the Church shall be when Antichrist comes for they themselues confesse that in Antichrists time there shall bee a desolation of the Church therefore by their owne confession it may and shall be sometimes inuisible Yea but say they ours is the true Church still though it be then obscured and we say then that Antichrist is come and our Church obscured therefore by their owne reason our Church is the true Church The second is from their Church which they haue here among vs they haue a Church here among vs here be Papists and Masses Arch-priests and Priests this themselues will not deny nay they boast of it sometimes yet is their Church visible among vs They will not affirme it at least they will not say it is visible in their sense that is that the world may take notice of it neither was it euer countenanced nor tolerated in our State so that in our sense and to vs it is inuisible and so may our Church bee to them The second Vse is for admonition to admonish vs that Vse 2 wee should not alwayes expect a glorious estate of the Church outwardly this is for earthly States and Kingdomes wee must not dreame of a temporall Kingdome here for Christs Kingdome is spirituall not of this World The Papists they say that it must be as glorious outwardly as any kingdome in the world but we must take heed that we be not carried away with shewes with the lookes of the Whore for Gods Kingdome comes not with obseruations Vse 3 Thirdly this may minister comfort to vs and may stay vs in the most desperate times that are when Satan rages most when persecutors are most bloody and deadly when the Prophets are slaine Gods Altars destroyed the Couenant forsaken when wee see hauocke to bee made of the Church faith renounced when wee see those that made great profession of Religion to hide their heads and like Starres to fall from Heauen when we see the Sunne to bee darkened and the Moone to bee turned into blood when we see Antichrist in his pride and pompe in the very Temple of God himselfe when wee see Heretikes swaying the World after them Schismatikes cutting and tearing out the bowels of their Mother the Church Nay euen in the generall Apostasie and reuolt from all Grace and Religion when there shall bee no honesty nor conscience found amongst men yet be not dismayed but rest thy selfe fully contented and satisfied with this truth that surely still God hath his Church in the World though there bee no
intendment as the thing it selfe tending directly to the damage and hurt of the Church and yet God so ouer-rules them as that they are meanes of the being of the Church as first hearing or reading the Word or some other good bookes with intent to deride or scoffe or cauill at them as we reade of one Virginius a Bishop of Rome who being set to write against Caluin and â—eading ouer Caluins bookes for that end hee saw the light so cleare against him that hee was conuinced and would write no more against him so that whereas he read ouer his books with intent to cauill at them God so ouer-ruled it that against his owne intendment he became a member of the true Church thereby Secondly the sinnes of Gods chosen why a man would thinke that they should tend directly to the hurt and damage of the Church yet God doth so ouer-rule the sinnes of his chosen as that he makes them causes of the being of the Church Thus God ouer-ruled the sinne of Saul in persecuting the Church to the making of him to be of the Church Act. 9.4.5 Thirdly the falling away of others from the faith is sometimes ouer-ruled by God to bee a cause of the raising of others to bee of the Church And this is the estate of vs all at this day the Iewes they fell away and through their fall saluation is come to the Gentiles as the Apostle shewes Rom. 11.11 Fourthly persecutions of the faithful that is so ouerrul'd by God as that it is made helpefull to the being of the Church Why what is more hurtfull to the Church euen to the destruction of it than this And yet this is sometime so ouer-ruled by God as against its owne bent and intendment it is a cause of the being of the Church for the cruelty of the Persecutors makes those that are of any humanity to detest them and their courses as also the constancy and holinesse of the Martyrs that are persecuted won the hearts of many euen of strangers yea of their aduersaries many times to the truth Examples of this wee haue had at home in our owne Land When were there euer more fruitfull times of the Churches increase in this Land than in Queene Maries bloody dayes at least euer since by occasion of those persecutions Lastly sometime the scattering of the Church in time of persecution is occasionally by the ouer-ruling hand of God a meanes of scattering the seed of the Word into many places and so of causing many Churches as in Act. 8.4 there was great persecution and the Word was scattered abroad what could hurt the Church more than this Yet this was so ouer-ruled by God as that hee made it a meanes of the propagation of his Church in many places whereas before it was in Iudea onely by this meanes it is come into Samaria too But all these are by-causes and therefore wee doe onely point at them and so passe them by yet this is worthy herein to bee taken notice of the wonderfull power wisdome and mercy of God that brings light out of darknesse and makes whatsoeuer pleaseth him euen besides and against its owne bent and intendment seruiceable meanes for the being of his Church The other sort of causes which were the first are such as cause the Church directly and of themselues and these are more proper and materiall than the other First then take the Church in a comparatiue sense as it is compared to a building and so the causes are to be apprehended thus As a building hath foure principall causes so hath the Church first in a building there is the foundation secondly the builders thirdly the matter of the building fourthly the forme So in Gods Church there is these foure causes of it first the foundation and that is Iesus Christ 1 Cor. 3.11 Other foundation can no man lay than that which is laid which is Iesus Christ and metaphorically the Prophets and Apostles as they teaching Christ 1 Cor. 3.10 As a skilfull master-builder I haue laid the foundation saith the Apostle Ephes 2.20 and are built vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles Christ Iesus being the head corner-stone c. Secondly the builders and they are the Teachers for so they are called 1 Pet. 2.7 The stone which the Builders refused c. that is which the Iewish Teachers refused And 1. Cor. 3.10 the teachers are called Master Builders Thirdly the matter of the building and they are Saints by calling liuing stones for so the faithfull are called 1 Pet. 2.5 liuely stones a spirituall house And in the 1 Cor. 3.9 they are called Gods building Lastly the forme of the building and that is the laying and the coupling of the faithfull together Ephes 2.21 22. In whom all the building coupled together groweth vnto an holy Temple in the Lord in whom yee are also built together to be the habitation of God by the Spirit And thus the Church is to be apprehended in a comparatiue sense as it is compared to a building Againe take the Church absolutely in it selfe and then it hath an efficient cause an instrumentall cause a materiall cause a formall cause and a finall cause First it hath an efficient cause from which it hath her being for that is the efficient cause of a thing from whence a thing hath that being which it hath Now the efficient cause from whence the Church hath her being is God himselfe he is the Author of it Act. 2.47 The Lord added to the Church c. so that God himselfe is the efficient cause of the Church Secondly the instrumentall cause or meanes of the being of the Church and they are of two sorts either outward or inward outward as first the Ministers of God they are the instrumentall causes whereby we are brought to beleeue as in the 1 Cor. 3.5 and these are sometimes ordinary sometime extraordinary ordinary that is when they haue an ordinary Calling as most Ministers if not all haue in these dayes extraordinary that is then when they are extraordinarily called as the Prophets and Iohn Baptist and the Apostles were The next outward instrumentall cause of the Church is the Word Ioh. 20.31 These things are written that ye might beleeue 2 Thes 2.14 whereunto he called you by our Gospell And in the 2 Cor. 5.19 both these outward instrumentall causes of the Church are laid downe together God hath committed vnto vs saith the Apostle the Word of reconciliation Then the Sacraments they are the next outward instrumentall causes or meanes of the being of the Church and first Baptisme Rom. 6.4 Know yee not that all we that haue been baptized into Christ haue been baptized into his death And the Lords Supper 1 Cor. 10.16 The Cup of blessing which wee blesse is it not the Communion of the blood of Christ The Bread which we breake is it not the Communion of the body of Christ By Baptisme we are made members of
answer we haue not our calling from the Church of Rome but from other ministers professing the same faith with vs as they haue Answ this might be a reason against Luther and other Ministers that had their calling in the Church of Rome Obiect it can be none against vs. Yea but say they Answ it came through their hands at first I answer that is nothing to vs many good things may come through theeues hands when the Arrian heresie spread it selfe ouer the world many Ministers came through their hands and therefore if this were a good Argument to proue wee were not a true Church then there should bee no true Church since the Apostles dayes But if wee had had our Calling from the Church of Rome I doe not see but that those Ministers that were ordained by the Church of Rome are warrantable and lawfull but I am sure ours now is lawfull if euer there were any since the Apostles death Yea but say they you haue no couenant made betwixt you and God Obiect I answer yes we doe make a couenant with God in Baptisme Yea but you were not gathered by the Word but compelled by a Proclamation in the beginning of Queene Elizabeths Raigne I answer Yes wee were gathered before in King Henery the eighth Answ and King Edward the sixth dayes so that this Proclamation was but a restoring of vs to our former estate as it was in the daies of Hezekiah 2 Chron. 30.5 where the people were restored to religion by the Kings Proclamation and this compulsion by the Proclamation was but to the outward meanes But now in our times there is no such compulsion but men are gathered by the word therfore this is vnseasonably applied to vs. Yes saith Ainsworth It is so still I answer If it be so that we are still compeld it is but to the outward meanes as I haue said but yet so many of vs as since the preaching of the Gospel doe voluntarily ioyne and enter couenant with God and the faithful are euen by our Aduersaries confession true members of a Church and therefore consequently such are a true visible Church Or else secondly they say If wee haue the meanes yet we haue not the successe Yes we haue the successe too for many of vs feele it and taste it to our singular consolation many of vs are conuerted Answ comforted instructed confirmed c. in our Church yea many of themselues were conuerted here amongst vs which is a manifest argument of our warrantable calling in that we haue experience of Christ that speaketh in our Ministers not weake but mighty in vs 1 Cor. 13.3 Or thirdly they say it may be effectually sometimes but it is not ordinarily effectuall I Answer What is more ordinary For first we haue many conuerted amongst vs and secondly this is dayly done and thirdly by these meanes that we haue amongst vs the preaching of the Word and fourthly this is as vsuall here as in any visible Church yea I dare vndertake that our Church is as fruitfull in gathering people and begetting Children vnto God as euer any Church was since the Apostles dayes they indeed had an extraordinary Calling and so an extraordinary successe which we must not looke for but ours is ordinarily effectuall for it is wrought vpon many and that day by day and also by the power of the meanes which is amongst vs and also as vsually as in any Church since the Apostles times And therefore ours must needs be a true Church therefore let none of vs entertaine any such thoughts into our heads as to thinke wee haue not the causes and meanes of a true Church amongst vs or that they be not effectuall to our conuersion and saluation or that they be not ordinarily effectuall But let vs blesse God for the means and the successe which daily they haue amongst vs lest for our vnthankfulnesse God depriue vs of them and turne from vs as he did from the Iewes and take his Church and presence from amongst vs. The eleuenth Lecture of the Church HAuing acquainted you already with the definition as also with the Causes of a true Church It remaines that we proceed in the third place to speake as we propounded of the members of the Church For whereas the visible Church is compared to a Body and every body consists of diuers parts and members framed and ioyned proportionably together if therefore wee would exactly know the body of a true visible Church we must be well instructed touching the parts and members of the same for the presence of the members proues the presence of the body looke where the members are there likewise is the body also And the state of the members well considered instructs vs rightly to esteeme of the state of the body for the body is to be accounted sound or vnsound accordingly as the members thereof are affected Now when we speake of the members of the Church we may as well vnderstand the head as the other parts for in a generall sense the head is as well a member as the rest of the parts of the body or else we may speake of all the other parts besides the head for so in a more strict and particular sense the head and the members are opposed against each other as they being diuerse from the head and the head from them Now because we desire to carry the matter fully before vs as neere as we can therefore we will speake of this body in the generall sense as including both head and members too First of the head for that being the chiefe and principall member is first and principally to bee spoken of specially in this case the head being here infinitely greater and more excellent than all the body besides and therefore first of that That which we will speake of in this point we will contriue into these three heads First that the visible Church must haue a head secondly that it must haue one head thirdly that this head is Iesus Christ and hee alone First that the Church being a body must haue a head for so in the first place the course of nature requires it for in the course of nature a headlesse body is a monstrous body imperfect without forme fashion life or gouernment Secondly as the course of nature requires it so the necessity of the Church requires it for the Church must be endued with spirituall life therefore it must haue a head to conuey life into it Thirdly the wisdome of God requires it for God is the God not of confusion but of order in all his works specially in his special workmanshippe that is his Church What a confused heape of stones would a Church be if it had not a head corner stone to hold all the other stones together euery one in his due place and what a disordered Assembly would the Church be if the members were without a head to order it and to releeue it Secondly as
the Church hath a head so it hath but one head for as a Body without a head is a monster in nature by defect so likewise if there bee two or many heads to one body it is a monster in nature by excesse Now the Church is but one body and therefore must haue but one head Thirdly this our head is Christ Iesus and hee alone for seeing the Church is his owne body therefore hee alone must bee the head if wee shall assigne any other to bee the head of the Church being Christs Body it is as if we should take the body of a man and set vpon it the head of a beast and so should be a body against nature for as a body without a head is a Monster in nature by defect and as a body with two or many heads is a Monster beyond nature by excesse so for a body to haue a head of another kind is against nature is as monstrous as either of the other therfore the Church being the body of Christ must haue Christ alone to be the head of it And thus the way is beaten out plaine to this naturall Obseruation which followeth Doctr. Namely That our Lord and Sauiour Iesus Christ as hee is most truly and properly the Head of the Church in generall that is of the whole company of the Elect which are his true mysticall body as we haue taught before so proportionably hee is also the Head of the true visible Churches that is of all Congregations in the World professing openly the sauing Faith For the clearing of this point wee must heare call to minde two things of which wee haue heard before First that there are some things affirmed in Scripture which are principally spoken of the inuisible Church but proportionably are to bee vnderstood of the visible the whole taking the name of the better part and so this is to be vnderstood here For when it is said simply that Christ is the Head of the Church it is meant principally of the inuisible Church and yet is proportionably to bee vnderstood of the visible Church because some of those members that are in the visible Church are also of the inuisible vniuersall Church the whole taking denomination of the better part And therefore I doe not say in the obseruation that Christ is simply the Head of a visible Church but proportionably because there are some in the visible Church that he is the head of The second point that we are here to call to mind for the clearing of the obseruation is this that the visible Church is either vniuersall or particular The vniuersall is the whole Company of those that professe the sauing truth through the world from the beginning to the end thereof a particular visible Church is a Company of those that ioyne together in the profession of the same sauing truth in some particular place and time c. Now therefore when I say Christ is the Head of a true visible Church I meane chiefly and most properly the vniuersall visible Church not but that it may be affirmed also of euery particular visible Church yea and of euery member too that is so farre forth as it is a member of Christ and Christ the Head thereof as the head is the head of the right side as well as of the left and of the hand too as well as of the whole body yet not simply and by way of appropriation but together with the rest of the members by way of participation and communication that is as being a member with the rest of such a body so all particular visible Churches from the beginning to the end of the world are indeed but one body though diuers in time place and other circumstances yet in the profession of the sauing truth they are but one and the same in generall And Christ is the head of the whole vniuersall visible Church and also hee is the head of euery particular visible Church but that is onely by way of communication as that particular Church concurres and participates with other particular Churches in the vniuersall visible Church simply in it selfe Christ cannot bee said to bee the head of one particular visible Church for then we should make many heads and many bodies as the head cannot be said to bee the head of the hand simply by it selfe but by way of concurrence with the rest of the members therefore when we say Christ is the head of a particular visible Church wee must vnderstand it in common as all particular visible Churches are members of that body whereof Christ is the head The Apostle makes this plaine in the 1 Cor. 12.27 Yee are the body of Christ and members for your part they are the body of Christ in some sense and yet in some sense they are but members and in both these senses they haue Christ to be their head Consider the Church of Corinth in it self and it is a body consider it in the generall with other particular Churches and it is but a part of the body I note this the rather to preuent an obiection ready to bee made against this truth which is That if Christ bee the head of euery particular visible Church in England and France c. then either there are many Christs because there are many bodies or else there is but one head to many bodies both which are absurd but Christ is the head of euery particular visible Church proportionably that is as that particular Church is a member of the vniuersall visible Church and so much shall serue for explication Now we come to the proofes That Christ Iesus is the Head and the onely Head proportionably of a true particular visible Church In Ephes 1.22 the Apostle saith God hath appointed him ouer all things to be the Head to his Church I grant that this is spoken principally and properly of the Church vniuersall for that is the onely body that is in all respects fitted and equalled to the head and the head to it Yet it holds consequently and by proportion of the visible Church for that is therefore called a Church because it is presumed that there were at least some faithfull and elect of God amongst them yea the Apostle seemes to speake it with reference to that particular Church of Ephesus whom he calleth Saints in the first verse and it could be no comfort to them to know that Christ is the Head to his Church vnlesse it were intended that they were a part of his body And so likewise Ephes 4.15 16. Christ is said to be the head of his body Now what body is that but onely that body spoken of in the 11. and 12. verses where his Ministery is publikely exercised and that is a true visible Church So in Ephes 5.23 Christ is the head of the Church and the Church is his body that is spoken principally of the inuisible Church but is proportionably to be vnderstood of the visible for the
Church So that in Ioh. 21. where our Sauiour saith three times to Peter Feede my sheepe c. What a slight ground is this to build the headship of the Church vpon And if they aske then why Christ should thus presse it vpon Peter so often The Fathers answer them that it is onely a speciall charge binding to Duty not any vniuersall authority or iurisdiction pressed thrice vpon him for his former threefold deniall of Christ that so hee might be the more carefull for the time to come else the charge is alike to all the rest of the Apostles for shall wee think that any of them were not bound to feede the sheepe of Christ as well as he The Apostle giues this charge to all Ministers 1 Pet. 5.2 Feed the flocke of God c. Yea but Peter is the Rocke and vpon this Rocke Christ will build his Church Matth. 16.18 I answer if the Church were built vpon Peter then it was either built vpon his person or vpon his Confession but it was not built vpon his person for then when he died the Church must haue failed too Therfore the place must be vnderstood of Peters confession or of his faith or of that Christ which he confessed Christ built his Church on the confession of Peters faith because himself was the substance of his confession c. Peters confession of his faith is the Rocke in making knowne the Church But Christ himselfe is the Rocke as being the substance of that his confession so that the Church is not built vpon Peters person And if it had what is that to the Pope Vnlesse they can proue these two things First that Peter sate at Rome as head of the vniuersall Church secondly that hee intended to leaue his headship to the Pope of Rome and to none other which is a meere fancie and deuice of their owne braine for which they haue no colour So then Christ neuer gaue Peter much lesse the Pope this headship Secondly as Christ neuer did giue it so he saith expressely he neuer will giue it Luk. 22.25 26. Our Sauiour saith to his Disciples that it was enough for the Gentiles to be Lords and to raigne one ouer another but it shall not bee so amongst you saith he so that Christ checks them for hauing but a conceit of superiority so far is he from giuing it to any of them Further this being a great part of Christs glory as he is Mediator to be head of his Church hee will not giue it to any other Isai 48.11 My glory will I not giue to another And as Christ neuer gaue this nor meant to giue it to any other so no man is able to weeld or sway it no more than any one temporall Gouernor can rule all the Kingdomes in the world no this power is reserued onely to him that made the whole world and all things therein So that we see they ouer-reach in saying the Pope is the head of the vniuersall visible Church Secondly they ouer-reach as far in saying he is the head if you aske them what head they meane They will say onely a ministeriall head vnder Christ heere is some shew of modesty But aske them further what power they ascribe to him And then they bewray themselues for they say that the gouernment of the whole Church through the world depends on him that he hath power and authority to iudge and determine of all causes of Faith and Religion to rule Councells to order Bishops and Pastors to excommunicate and to suspend and to inflict other penalties vpon offenders yea whatsoeuer concerneth either preaching of Doctrine or the practice of Discipline in the Church of Christ the power of gouerning in all such causes they say lies in the Pope Is this to be a ministeriall head This is rather to be an absolute supreame head If by head they meant onely some chiefe Gouernour the name head in that sense might agree to some one man in respect of some one particular place for so the Scripture vseth the word in other cases in the 1 Cor. 11.3 The man is the womans head c. But neuer in this case for a man to be the head of the whole Church This transcendent power by them ascribed to the Pope is a great part of Christs owne power and can neuer agree to any man in the world for Christ is the onely Doctor of his Church Mat. 23.8 10. How then can the Pope determine all matters of faith and religion Is not this to make him a great Doctor yea the onely Doctor No say they for hee doth it but vnder Christ But he doth it of himselfe if the Pope in controuersies would take Christs booke and vse prayer to God for direction therein and in humility and sincere loue of the Truth would examine euery cause and so iudge there were some hope that he would doe many things well and that he would iudge rightly as in Christs stead and so honour his Master and doe good seruice to the Church But first he takes no such course but mingles with the word and vseth his owne Canons in stead of the word and he is so farre from vsing prayer to God for direction as that he presumes the truth is tyed to his Chayre and therefore that he cannot erre in any of his Sentences likewise hee is sinisterly affected to the Truth framing it to the state and practice of his owne Church and accordingly hee iudges and pronounces Secondly if he should take the former course yet his reach is not infinite hee cannot iudge rightly in all causes of faith and religion for no one man that euer was Christ Iesus onely excepted and his Apostles that was able to iudge of all Truth Therefore euery Pope in particular must be at least as one of the Apostles nay he must be as Christ is For if the Apostles could doe it yet they had fellowes Paul as well as Peter could do this But the Pope is without any fellow yea he will take vpon him to iudge of the Apostles owne Doctrine and writings so that though he pretends to be Peters successor only yet vpon the point he takes on him to be Peters Master euen to be Christ so proues himself to be very Antichrist yea and he not onely takes vpon him Christs Office but he takes his name vpon him also hee calls himselfe the chiefe Shepheard which name is proper to Christ onely 1 Pet. 5.4 What is this but to step into the throne of Christ But they except against vs and say doe you finde fault with vs for saying the Pope is the head of the Church Why you your selues make the King supreame head of the Church I answer how do we say the King is the head of the Church as they say the Pope is No but wee say the King is the head of the Church within his iurisdiction to see Gods religion maintained Answ and to see the
it so these hypocrites professe themselues outwardly to bee true members by possession and are so accounted of others yet they are not that within which outwardly they professe and therefore are no true members by right Thirdly there are some that are members both by right and by possession too and so are onely the faithfull that make profession of the sauing faith and none but they Rom. 10.10 If they beleeue with the heart and confesse with the mouth they are true members for faith giues vs right to be true members of the Church and the outward profession of this faith giues vs possession of it so that onely the faithfull making profession of their faith are true members of the visible Church by right and by possession I will giue you an instance of all these kinds of those that are members by right and not by possession and also of those that are members by possession and not by right lastly of those that are members both by right and by possession In Matth. 21.29 there is a Parable of the two sonnes the eldest sonne hee was bid to goe and worke in the Vineyard and he said he would not but afterward hee repented himselfe and went here was a member by right though not by possession then because hee refused to goe in the 30. verse there is the younger sonne that was bidden goe and said he would but went not there was a member by possession because he said he would goe but not by right because he went not So likewise the Scribes and Pharisies Mat. 23.3 made shew to be members of the Church but by right they were not for they said and did not Lastly members by right and by possession too so were all the Prophets and Apostles so was the Prophet Dauid Psalm 116.10 I beleeued saith he therefore I spake and so was the Apostle Paul and the rest of the Apostles 2 Cor. 4.16 We beleeue and therefore we speake We beleeue here is our right therefore we speake here is our possession So that in these instances we haue examples of these three sorts of members Now the matter of greatest doubt and most consequence is concerning the wicked how they can be members of Gods Church therefore that is most to bee insisted on And for the better vnderstanding thereof I will draw it into an Obseruation And the Obseruation is this Doctr. That Hypocrites and Castawayes may be and are oftentimes members euen of a true visible Church for proofe of this you shall heare it witnessed out of their owne mouthes Luk. 13.26 We haue eaten and drunke in thy presence and thou hast taught in our streetes c. Therefore they were members of the true visible Churches and yet they were Reprobates for our Sauiour saith vnto them vers 27. I know yee not depart from me yee workers of iniquity And so Matth. 7.22 they shall say to our Sauiour Haue not we by thy Name prophesied and by thy Name cast out Diuels and by thy Name done many great workes And yet our Sauiour shall say vnto them I neuer knew yee depart from me yee workers of iniquitie These were members of true visible Churches and yet they were hyprocrites and castawayes so yee haue heard it from their owne mouthes Now take it from a surer witnesse out of the mouth of our Sauiour himselfe in that Parable Matth. 13.47 48. where the kingdome of heauen is compared to a draw-Net cast into the Sea that gathereth all kind of fish good and bad Here it is so clearely laid downe as if the Parable had been framed of purpose to proue this point I will not stand here to proue that by the kingdome of heauen is meant the visible Church though the place would beare it wel enough but it signifies plainely the preaching of the Gospell or the Gospell preached whereby a Church is gathered and fitted for the Kingdome of heauen for in that sense it is taken in vers 31. Now vnderstand the comparison thus Like as a draw-Net that is cast into the Sea gathers of all kinds good and bad so the preaching of the Gospell is cast forth into the World and gathers all kind of men good and bad chosen and reprobates hypocrites and true beleeuers all are gathered by this Net into the outward communion of the faithful and as the bad fishes are part of this draught as well as the good so the wicked outwardly gathered by the Gospell are also parts and members of the visible Church as well as the godly So likewise another Parable we haue to proue this point Ioh. 15.1 2. In the first verse our Sauiour saith I am the Vine and in the second verse hee sets downe two sorts of branches some that abide in him and bring forth fruit and these are the faithfull others that beare no fruit that are taken away what are these but hypocrites and castawayes Therefore they are parts of the visible Church as well as the faithfull Obiect But will some say Was there euer any hypocrite or castaway a true Branch of Christ then belike the true branches that is the true members of Christ may bee cast away I answer None are in Christ Answ but such as are ingrafted into his body now some are so ingrafted as that they receiue iuyce and life from the root and they are the faithfull others are so ingrafted as they receiue iuyce only from the barke and so neuer thriue but only continue in shew for a short time a yeare or two c. and then fall away and these are hypocrites The faithfull that are ingrafted into the body of Christ they receiue iuyce and life from him and can neuer fall away but hypocrites and castawayes they are but grafted into the barke that is into the outward communion and so receiue iuyce onely and continue for a time but afterward they fall away so wee haue seene it proued by Parables See it likewise proued by examples and that will make it more plaine and in alleaging these examples I may propound these two things First what Church euer was there but had some wicked men in it and secondly what wickednes was there euer so great but it hath been found in the members of some visible Church or other as by these examples may appeare Looke into Gen. 4.3 Caine was a member of the visible Church his outward conformity to religious duties proues it for he brought his offering to God and yet hee was a wicked reprobate So Gen. 9.18 Ham he was a member of the visible Church for he was preserued in the Arke and yet hee was an accursed wretch as we may see in the 25. verse If we looke into our Sauiours chosen Disciples they were certainely a true visible Church else there was neuer any in the world and yet there was a Iudas a member of it and a Diuell Ioh. 6.70 So if wee looke into those Churches in the Reuelation 2. and 3. Chapters many of them were
right to and possession in When God giues a man gifts he hath a possible right and when he is appointed by the Authoritie and Orders of the Church that giues him actuall possession Secondly euery such officer is an officer both for God and for men and therefore hee must bee inuested by each Man inuests him by appointment God inuests him when hee is qualified by himselfe and appointed by man according to Gods ordinance So much for the first generall answer that officers in the Church must bee men qualified with a competent measure of gifts Secondly that they must bee appointed thereto by the Authority and Orders of the Church wherein they liue Answ 2 Now I come to answer particularly and by name to the Question namely what these officers are It were too great a labour and yet to no great purpose to reckon vp all particular officers that haue had to doe in Church businesses for besides the ordinary there haue been many extraordinary Some in our Sauiours time and the Age next succeeding as Apostles that were to teach at large through the whole world Matth. 28.19 c. and Prophets to foresee and foreshew things to come as Agabus Act. 11. and Euangelists to bee Assistants to the Apostles Others there were also in many Ages after as Exorcists Doore-keepers Acolutiues and Readers c. but whether these were in rightfully or wrongfully is to bee seene hereafter In the meane time we will speake of such officers as were of ordinary and necessary vse in the Church either such as were indeed or else are pretended so to be on probable and plausible grounds Wee will begin with the officers of the Ministery as that being the principall duty and so they the principall Church-officers in the most strait and proper sense We will take them in their orders first we will begin with Bishops secondly we will come to Presbyters then to Doctors then to gouerning Elders then to Deacons then to Widowes then to other Assistants lastly we will come to speake of the Christian Magistrate First wee will begin with Bishops and first wee will speake of their name secondly of their office First of their name Bishop is as much to say as an Ouerseer in the Originall and it is attributed vnto them by a kind of excellency for there are many Ouer-seers but these are the chiefe in the Scripture sense that are and these are Ouer-seers by a kind of excellency whether we respect the persons they ouer-see or whether we respect their designement to that office or whether wee respect the worke they doe First if we respect the persons they ouer-see they are ouer-seers by a kind of excellency for they ouer-see the faithfull or the flocke of Christ for whereas they haue other ouer-seers as they are Subiects they haue the King and other Magistrates to be their Ouer-seers yet none are so as these for these are their Ouer-seers as they are the flock of Christ Secondly if we respect their speciall designment ouer that flock they haue a more speciall designment ouer the Lords flock than any other Ouer-seer hath ouer any other people the holy Ghost makes them ouer-seers after a speciall manner Thirdly if we respect their worke which is to feede and that not with bodily foode but with spirituall and heauenly food to eternall life All these are intimated Act. 20.28 Take heed to the flocke ouer which the holy Ghost hath made ye Ouer-seers to feed the Church of God c. First they are Ouer-seers and that by a kind of excellency first in respect of the persons they ouer-see which is the flocke of Christ Take heed to the flocke c. Secondly in respect of their speciall assignment ouer which the holy Ghost hath made yee Ouer-seers And thirdly in respect of their work to feed the Church of God c. And as this name Ouer-seer is restrained onely to these so it may bee safely extended to euery particular in that kind and so is the vse in Scripture Phil. 1.1 To all the Saints in Christ Iesus which are at Philippi with the Bishops c. And most plainely in the 1 Tim. 3.1 If any man desireth the office of a Bishop c. this is the generall signification of the word in Scripture But you shall vnderstand that by common practice of speech I find this name alwayes almost euer since the Apostles times particularly applied to those that haue a primacy and precedency in the Church aboue their fellow-Ministers and so Bishops are not Ouer-seers of the flocke onely but also of the Pastors too within such a compasse some greater some smaller which we call Diocesses and as this is generally so in all antient Writers so likewise if the Postscript be authenticall 2 Tim. as for any thing I see it must then the Scripture fauours it too for there Timothy is said to be a Bishop in this sense and so had other Pastors vnder him And so much for the signification of the name Bishop Now wee come to their Office we speake still in the particular sense their Office besides their preaching and other ministeriall Duties common to all Ministers consists First in ordaining Ministers secondly in reforming things amisse First in ordaining Ministers So it is said of Titus that hee was left in Crete to ordaine Elders Titus 1.5 and so in the 1 Tim. 5.22 the Apostle would haue Timothy lay hands rashly on no man c. What is it to lay on hands but to ordaine Ministers And this Timothy must doe and thereto Antiquitie so plainely agrees that Ierome though otherwise bitter enough against Bishops acknowledged it to be done by them and misliked not the doing of it And surely seeing ordination must be continued in the Church some Persons must needs haue a special ouer-ruling hand in it and who are they but Bishops that is they that are highest and chiefest in the Ministery So the Apostles and so the Euangelists being the chiefest in the Ministry did ordaine Ministers If it be said that the Apostles ordained not as Bishops but as Apostles and Timothy and Titus not as Bishops but Euangelists yet the same office being of necessitie still to be performed some must alwaies be in the Church answerable to them in that respect call them how you will if not Bishops yet they must haue as much authoritie in this businesse as I for my part do ascribe to Bishops It is true that extraordinary Officers are not to be imitated in extraordinary workes but in their ordinary workes of continuall and necessary vse when extraordinary Officers cease ordinary must succeed them I doe not say they did this wholly and alone but stil other Presbyters or Ministers were assistants and layd on hands with them and so it was in the Primitiue Church and so our Law requires that the Bishop should make no Minister vnlesse other Ministers be with him but yet still they haue the chiefe stroke the power of ordaining
peculiar to him and other ministers to administer it which wee blesse c. The third Duty is prayer Act. 6.4 and in the 1 Cor. 14.16 there the manner of publike prayer is plainely set downe that is that which is conceiued by the Minister and the people accompanying him in their affections and saying Amen The fourth Duty belonging to their Office is that they be an example to their flocke of holinesse in life so the Apostle exhorts the Elders to whom hee writ 1 Pet. 5.3 to bee an example to their flocke and so the Apostle exhorts Timothy to bee an example to them that beleeue 1 Tim 4.12 The fifth Duty is to visit the sicke So it is intended Iames 5.14 If any man bee sicke let him call for the Elders of the Church c. Their sixth Duty they are to vse and exercise the power of the Keyes both in binding and loosing for that also is common to them with the Apostles and that which is said to the Apostle in Ioh. 20.23 is said also to all true Ministers Whose sinnes soeuer ye remit on earth they are remitted c. This is peculiar to all in the Ministery and none else The seuenth Duty belonging to their Office is that they are to haue care ouer the poore I vrge it not so much that they should distribute with their owne hands yet that is needfull too where greater occasions are not hindred by it for so the Apostles all was brought and laid at their feet and they did distribute it till they had greater businesse in hand But this they ought to doe to see it performed by those that are in places both collections and distributions 1 Cor. 16.1 Eighthly and lastly their Duty is to bee continually resident and attendant ouer their Charge Act. 20.28 Take heede to the flocke ouer which the holy Ghost hath made you ouerseers c. The very name Ouerseer intends so much that they must be continually resident ouer the flocke wherein the Apostles themselues though they went from place to place yet they were very carefull in visiting and in writing to the Churches which they had planted as Paul and Barnabas did Act. 15.36 and they did long to bee with them as the Apostle Paul saith Rom. 1.11 and when they were hindred from it they bewailed it as Satans worke therein So doth the same Apostle 1 Thes 2.8 and when they could not come themselues they supplied their bodily absence by the presence of their Ministers and Deputies as also by Letters But no ordinary Minister can thus excuse himselfe but they are continually bound to bee resident And the danger is exceeding great when the Pastor is absent as wee may see in the 1 Cor. 15.12 When the Apostle was absent some crept into the Church that taught errors and false Doctrine as that there is no resurrection c. and the danger of it amongst vs is too apparant and lamentable And therefore wee are to pray vnto God that those in Authoritie may force them that are tied to a Charge to be resident vpon it so much for Presbyters In the third place we come to Doctors I finde the word vsed in Ephes 4.11 and we expound it Teachers which hath two significations First I find it to bee vnderstood of those that teach the Word and that is the true and onely sense of it in the Scriptures secondly sometimes it is vnderstood of those that instruct Schollers specially in the grounds of Religion and so after in other matters and so it is taken in some antient Writers The question concerning Doctors is in the former sense this Whether there must bee such an one in euery particular Congregation as a seuerall Officer from the Pastor For answer whereunto I say that the Office of a Doctor is necessary in both senses generally in the Church and also in the former sense as hee is a Teacher hee is necessary in euery particular Congregation yea and further I say that if there bee in one and the same Congregation a Doctor in whom is the Word oâ— knowledge ioyned with a Pastor in whom is the word of wisdome 1 Cor. 12.8 it is not to be misliked But that this must be so of necessitie that wee deny for howsoeuer the gifts bee diuers the Doctors to teach and expound the Scripture the Pastors to apply it yet they may bee and are vsually found in the same Person and therefore wee shall find it Scripture that teaching and preaching concurre together in the same Officer so it is said of our Sauiour Christ himselfe Matth. 9.35 That hee went about teaching and preaching the Gospell And so it is said of the Apostles Paul and Barnabas Act. 15.35 That they continued preaching and teaching at Antioch And so the Apostle 1 Tim. 6.2 requires this in Timothy that he teach and exhort And this is generally required of all preaching Elders 1 Tim. 5.17 that they labour in the Word and Doctrine and what is that but to teach and apply And euery Minister must bee apt to teach What necessitie is there of a Doctor in euery particular Congregation Howsoeuer then they are diuerse gifts yet commonly they are found in the same person and that which they alleage Eph. 4.11 makes directly against them for if the Apostle there had meant to haue made them diuerse offiâ—es heâ— would haue disioyned theÌ„ with the same note of difference as hee did the other and haue said and some Pastors and some Teachers but in that he conioynes them together and saith Pastors and Teachers hee makes them to bee as one Now we come in the fourth place to gouerning Elders I finde Gouernors mentioned in Scripture as in the 1 Cor. 12.28 and also Rulers Rom. 12.8 And I deny not but this is of necessary vse in the Church for the Ministers must bee endued with it they must rule and gouerne as we haue seene before 1 Tim. 5.17 And it may bee of good vse too for the Church euen in those that are out of the Ministry as in the Christian Magistrate but that this must bee meant directly of some that must of necessity rule in euery particular Church besides the Ministers I cannot see specially seeing they ascribe to these Rulers a hand in the Censures of the Church which being a chief part of the power of the keyes and therefore appropriated to the Ministers and limited by Christ onely to the Apostles and them how shal they be imparted to others without their open wrong I will deliuer my iudgment briefely and freely in this case First either there were none such at all or if there were such they were onely by practice not by institution or if they were by institution yet they were for that present dispensation and not perpetuall or lastly if they were perpetuall yet our Church is not destitute in that case First either there were none such at all for first whereas it is said that the Iewes had their Elders
Angells and there wee shall liue continually praising and glorifying God there we shall haue fulnesse of ioy and pleasures for euermore Psal 16. To conclude therefore let vs not debase our selues to sinfull and vile and slauish courses but let vs labour to walke in some good measure answerable to such great and high priuiledges as these are The Twentieth LECTVRE of the CHVRCH THe last point we spake of was concerning the priuiledges of the Church not humane such as Kings and men endowed the Church withall but diuine such as God endues the Church withall and therein wee handled two points first that there are such priuiledges belonging to the Church secondly what these Priuiledges are there is something to be added to the last point namely what they are For there are two speciall priuiledges something questionable aboue the rest each of them subiect to mistaking and the mistaking of them is and hath beene the cause of much error The first is concerning the infallible guidance of the Church by the Spirit of truth and thereupon ariseth this question whether the Church may erre or no The second Priuiledge questionable is concerning the necessity of being a member of the Church if euer wee will attaine saluation and thereupon ariseth this question whether any can be saued out of the Church or no These are the two points which I purpose to handle at this time The first is concerning the infallible guidance of the Church by Gods Spirit wherupon ariseth this question whether the Church may erre or no And because error is a generall name affirmed as wel of matters of obedience as of knowledge of bad maÌ„ners as well as of false doctrine therfore in plaine and large termes it shall be propounded and handled thus whether the Church may erre either in manners or doctrine or in both or in neither to open the way to the disclosing of the point wee are to vnderstand rightly these words Church and Error First concerning the word Church for whereas sometimes it signifies the whole Company of Beleeuers liuing on earth somtimes some one visible Congregation professing the Faith of Christ the state of the question is not of both alike but we must vnderstand it far otherwise of the one then of the other For whereas in the first sense it containes Beleeuers onely and all of them together it must needs haue some speciall Priuiledge aboue particular Congregations at least for some kinde of Error Euery Beleeuer hath a Priuiledge in that respect aboue an vnbeleeuer therefore all together much more so that if it bee possible that one or two might be seduced to Error yet that all of them together should bee so it is impossible And whereas in the second sense the Church consists of Hypocrites as well as true Beleeuers yea sometime all or most of Hypocrites therefore the Church taken in this sense must needes bee more subiect vnto Error then in the former sense Secondly concerning the word Error The Word of God prescribes euery true and right way and euery swaruing from that is therefore called Error whether it be in Doctrine or manners because it is a going from that true and right way which the Word of God doth teach vs And though Error properly signifie a swaruing from the Truth whether on the right or on the left hand yet it comprehends â—gnorances too that is their not attaining to some heauenly Truthes these Errors are of diuers kindes especially foure First some are either fundamentall or in smaller matters Secondly some are either of obstinacy or of infirmity Thirdly some are either finite and for a time others are for euer Fourthly some are either generall or particular First some are either fundamentall or in smaller matters fundamentall Errors are such which being held doe race the very foundation he that erres in this manner cuts himselfe off from Christ and cannot be saued such was the Error of the Church of Galâ—tia in Gal. 5.2.4 where they ioyned the workes of the Law with Christ in the matter of Iustification and therefore the Apostle tells them in the 2. verse that if they were circumcised Christ should profit them nothing and vers 4. yee are abolished from Christ whosoeuer is iustified by the workes of the Law is fallen from Grace Other Errors are of smaller moment as when men hold the foundation but yet erre in building on it and such notwithstanding these errors may bee saued 1 Cor. 3.12 to 15. the Apostle saith that some build hay and stubble vpon the Foundation but shall this turne to their damnation No themselues shal be saued saith hee but what without Repentance No for in the 13. verse it is said The day shall declare it because it shall bee reuealed by Fire and the Fire shall trie euery mans worke of what sort it is that is the Day or Light of Gods Truth shall dispell this darkenesse and the Fier of Gods Spirit shall purifie and purge away these errors from them so that they must repent of these errors But then yee will say what difference is there betwixt those that erre in the foundation and those that erre in smaller matters for they that erre in the foundation shall be saued too vpon their Repentance It is true but yet there is great difference betwixt them for first they that erre in the foundation are seldome and hardly reclaimed not one amongst a hundreth but they that erre in smaller matters are vsually and easily reclaimed for if the foundation bee ouerthrowen all must bee reared vp a new but if any thing that is built vpon it be amisse it may be easily amended yea those that erre in smaller matters cannot chuse but bee reclaimed as hauing the foundation and therefore cannot possibly perish Secondly those that erre in the foundation must repent particularly of that error and must also embrace the contrary Truth else hee cannot be saued But those that erre in matters of lesse moment though they doe not repent of their error in particular Nay though they do not know them for who knowes his errors yet if they repent in general of them they shall find mercy pardon from God so that we see there is a great difference betwixt these Secondly some errors are either of Infirmity or of Obstinacy Of infirmitie as when wee are either by negligence Ignorance Ouersight weakenesse as being taken tripping in a snare against our knowledge and against our purpose and holy desire or by other occasions such the Apostle speakes of Gal. 6.1 Brethren if a man be suddenly fallen into any offence yee which are spirituall restore such a one c when as they see it not to bee an error or if they doe see it to be so yet they haue some weake desire and labour against it but yet the assault is so strong and their corruption so great that they cannot ouercome it this is an Error of Infirmitie Some errors are of obstinacy that is
when as the Partie knowes the right and yet willingly declines from it and these that thus erre are so far from striuing against their Error that they rather striue against a manifest Truth to maintaine their Error such an Error the Iewes are taxed for by Stephen Acts 7.51 and by Paul himselfe Acts 28.26 where he applies a place out of Esay to them shewing their obstinacie that in seeing they did see and not perceiue c. so that this is an error of obstinacy for a man to know the Truth and yet willingly to decline from it Thirdly some are finite and for a time onely some finall and for euer for a time onely and vpon better Aduice they change their minde such was Peters deniall of Christ Matth. 26.75 for which hee presently repented and went out and wept bitterly Againe some are finall and for euer as when men liue and dye in sinne without any Repentance at all at least without any true and sound Repentance such was the sinne of Iudas in betraying Christ he died desperately in it without any true Repentance Mat. 27.3 5. Lastly some Errors are particular some are generall and each of these in two respects first in respect of the persons that erre secondly in respect of the things they erre in for when as one or two or some few men in a Congregation are tainted with Error here is a particular Error in respect of the persons as it was in the Church of Corinth when as but some of them denied the Resurrection and not all 1 Cor. 15.12 But when as all or the greatest part in a Church erre this is a generall Error in respect of the persons An Instance of this wee haue in the Iewes when as they did all cry out against our Sauiour Christ Crucifie him Crucifie him So secondly in respect of the things erred in as when a man or a Church erres onely in one or in few things this is a particular Error in that respect so did the Church of Pergamus Reuel 2.14 I haue a few things against thee But when a man or a Church erres in all or the most things this is generall also in respect of the things they erre in as the Church of Rome at this day erres in all or the most things and so their Error is generall in that respect as also in respect of their persons Now to apply all this to the subiect of the question whether the Church may erre in all or in any of these respects or no If wee vnderstand the Church in the first sense for the whole Company of Beleeuers liuing on earth in this sense the Church may be said to erre first in matters of smaller moment not in the foundation Secondly of Infirmity not of obstinacy Thirdly at least onely for a time not for euer Fourthly particularly not vniuersally either in respect of the persons or of the things But if wee vnderstand the Church in the latter sense of one particular Congregation in this sense the Church may erre in all these which that I may the more largely and distinctly without Confusion deliuer and you apprehend receiue it plainely in these Obseruations The First is this That the Church militant the whole Company of Beleeuers on earth howsoeuer it hath many excellent Priuildges by the Spirit of truth yet it is not so exempted from Error but that it may and doth oftentimes erre both in Doctrine and manners I shall not neede to handle Errors in manners by themselues and Errors in Doctrine by themselues for each of these are transgressions against the Word Wil of God and they are both damnable and each alike may take hold of the Church 1 Cor. 13.12 The Apostle Paul speaking of himselfe being then a sound yea a principall Member of the Church of Christ acknowledgeth ingenuously much Ignorance that hee knowes little to that hee should know he knowes but in part Now Ignorance being an Error in a generall sense as wee heard before then we see that the Apostle willingly vndergoes the Imputation of Error and if he bee in Error who can looke to escape And therevpon it followes by necessary consequence that he erred in manners too for wee cannot bee obedient in that wee doe not know so that as his knowledge was imperfect so was his loue and obedience too But for errors in manners it is far plainer in Rom. 7.22 23. where the Apostle acknowledgeth that there was a Law in his members rebelling against the Law of his minde and leading him captiue vnto the law of sinne c and this was not his infirmity alone but it is the infirmity of all the Faithfull the Spirit stirres them vp to doe good yea but saith the Apostle Galat. 5.17 the flesh lusteth against the Spirit and the Spirit against the flesh and these are contrary one to another so that you cannot doe the same things you would And our Sauiour giues an Inckling of this to his Disciples in a kinde of Parable Ioh. 13.10 where he faith He that washed is needeth no â—â—ue to wash his feete c. which though it be spoken in a negatiue sense as shewing that nothing needes washing in them but their feete yet it is affirmatiue in force shewing that none is so cleansed and purified but that still hee hath foule feete that is hee hath still sinne and error in him and these must be cleansed and washed away or else he can haue no part in Christ Iesus as in verse 8 So likewise for error in manners the Apostle Iames 3.2 saith In many things wee sinne all there all are included and that not in one kinde onely as nâ— a diuided sense as if one should offend in one thing and another in another thing but in a compounded sense not one or many but all sinne and that not in one or few things but in many And for further confirmation of the Truth hereof it is elsewhere negatiuely deliuered as in the 1 King 8.46 There is not a man that liues and sinnes not now lay these two together and we shall see that none is exempted from error in manners So for Error in Doctrine Rom. 3.4 where it is not onely affirmed in generall of all and of euery one in particular that euery man is a liar that is that he erres in some of his Apprehensions of the Truth but the Apostle doth likewise so derogate the holding of the whole Truth entirely and incorruptly from man that he appropriates it to God alone so that it is as possible for man to bee God as not to bee deceiued So that the Doctrine is cleare that the Church militant that is the Company of Beleeuers liuing on earth may and oftentimes doe erre both in Doctrine and manners So much for proofe of the point out of Scripture Reas 1 The Reasons of the point are these First mans frailtie The members of the militant Church true Beleeuers they are but men and therefore naturally louing darkenesse
in the like case but if men were neuer before baptized then though they bee of yeares of discretion yet they are to receiue Baptisme But whether hath the Church power to compell men to be members No surely faith cannot be forced vpon any yet if the Magistrate be Christian he by his authority may and must compell men to come to the outward meanes else wee deny him the priuiledge of his authority and of our subiection So did Iosiah cause all that were found in Ierusalem and Beniamin to stand to the couenant 2 Chron. 34.32 As they haue power to admit into the Church so they haue power to repell and keepe out and this wee finde to be plaine Acts 8.36.37 See heere is water saith the Eunuch what doth let mee to be baptised Philip said vnto him if thou beleeuest with all thine heart thou may'st c. as who should say where faith is wanting it is a sufficient let to keepe from baptisme and so from being admitted into the Church But what shall children doe then I answer they if they be the seed of the faithfull are pre-supposed to be within the couenant and so they are to be reputed as Gen. 17.7 God saith to Abraham I will establish my Couenant betweene mee and ther and thy seede after thee and Acts 3.29 The promise is made to you and to your children saith the Apostle and so in the 1 Cor. 7.14 The vnbeleeuing wife is sanctified by the beleeuing husband c. else were your children vncleane but now are they holy and therefore where children are tendred by faithfull parents to the Church they must admit them so far as they haue power and that is to baptisme Marke 10.13.14 as it was with circumcision in the time of the Law the children of the faithfull all that were males were circumcised so it is in Baptisme which succeedes in the roome of that all the children of beleeuing parents are to be made partakers of it So you see the Church hath power ouer persons that are not come in and that either to admit or repell them Secondly they haue power ouer persons as they are come in already and that either to keepe them in or to cast them out to keepe them in as in Reu. 3.11 Our Sauiour saith to the Angell of the Church of Philadelphia Hold fast that thou hast that no man take thy Crowne from thee and what was the Angels Crowne but the faithfull in that Church So the Apostle Paul calls the Thesalonians his Crowne and how must hee hold them fast and keepe them in By confirming exhorting reprouing comforting and instructing them bearing with their weaknesse admitting them to the Lords Table and vpon their repentance loosing them from their sinnes So the Church hath power to cast out for their obstinacy in sinne and so to binde them in the chaines of euerlasting damnation that the Church hath this power it is plaine for the Word of God is powerfull each way It is the sauour of life vnto life vnto some to other It is the sauour of death vnto death so the Censures of the Church are wonderfull powerfull Iohn 20.23 whose sinnes yee remit they are remitted and whose sinnes soeuer yee retaine they are retained saith our Sauiour to his Disciples And so we see how the Church did cast out the Incestuous man in 1 Cor. 5.4 5. and how they receiued him in againe in the 2 Cor. 2.7 8. The next point is the power that the Church hath ouer members as officers and herein the Church hath power to choose or refuse to place or displace to choose and place Acts 6.5 and the saying pleased the multitude and they choose Stephen c. to refuse and displace as in Acts 8.21 Peter refused Simon Magus when he would haue bought gifts of the holy Ghost for money and in the 1 Tim. 5.11 refuse younger widdowes c. and in the 1 Kings 2.27 to the 35. we may read how Salomon displaced and cast out Abiather from the Priests office But of this I haue spoken sufficiently before the matter of Church gouernment and therefore as I promised I will referre you thither Now in the second place the Church hath power ouer things and these things are of diuers kindes some are matters of substance some of circumstance the Churches power in matters of stubstance is eyther touching the Scripture it sefe or in things besides the Scripture as touching the Scripture and that is eyther touching the credit and authority of Scripture or the sense of it first of the credit and authority of Scripture which is called into question and much disparaged not onely by those that are without but euen of those that professe themselues to be within and to be members of the Church which should most lighly esteeme it some of of her champions as they pretend challenge at least an equall yea indeed a superiour authority to the Church aboue the Scripture and therefore the point to be discused here is whether the authority of the Church be greater then the authority of the Scripture It is not denyed but that the Church hath some authority concerning Scripture as wee shall heare afterward but that it hath authority equall with or aboue Scripture is not to be granted I will draw this point into an obseruation Doctr. which shall be this That howsoeuer the Church of God is endued with great power and authority from aboue yet the authority of the Church is not greater then the authority of the Scripture no it is not equall with it but the authority of the Scripture is greater and higher then the authority of the Church here are two parts of this obseruation First that the authority of the Church is not greater then of the Scripture secondly that the authority of Scripture is greater then of the Church the same places that proue one proue both Ioh. 4.39 The woman of Samariah hauing had conference with our Sauiour and beleeuing him to be the Messiah she went and told it in the Citty and it is said in the 39. verse that many of the Samaritans beleeued in Christ for the saying of the woman but it is said in the 41. verse that many moe beleeued because of Christs owne words The voyce of the woman what is it but the voyce of the Church shee beleeuing in Christ her selfe propounds him vnto others which is the Office of the Church in this case well the people beleeued for her saying but doe they rest vpon that as the chiefest authority of their faith No for verse 41. many moe beleeued for his owne word and verse 42. they that did beleeue for the saying of the woman acknowledge a greater and surer cause of their faith disclayming the former as insufficient now say they wee beleeue not for thy saying for wee haue heard him our selues and know that this indeede is that Christ the Sauiour of the world and is not Christs voyce to
be beleeued besides the Word Gal. 1.8 Reas 6 Lastly the practice of the faithful is answerable to this both of teachers and learners the Teachers they haue referred the people still for certaine proofe of the truth to the Scriptures Esa 8.20 to the law and to the testimony if they speake not according to this Word it is because they haue not light in them Acts 10.43 to him giue all the Prophets witnesse saith Peter to Cornelius referring the truth hee taught to be tryed by the Scripture and so this hath beene the practice of the learners Acts 17.11 12. The men of Berea seached the Scriptures to try whether the things were so as Paul had taught them and yet Paul was a principall member of the Church and in his Doctrine hee was specially guided by the Spirit more then euer any Church was since and the Bereans are commended for this and not accounted curious So that the Teachers and the Learners haue still referred themselues for the tryall of the truth to the Scriptures and not to the Church and therefore the authority of the Scripture is greater then the authority of the Church Yea Obiect but you will say so the Scriptures are vsually referred to the censure of other Scripture and yet that is no proofe that therefore one Scripture is of greater authority then another how then doth this proue that the Scripture is of greater authority then the Church I answer Answ yes It proues the first ponit of the obseruation plainely that is that the Church is not aboue the Scripture which is the maine controuersie Nay if it be well considered it proues the second point of the obseruation that the authority of the Scripture is greater then that of the Church I say it proues it as sufficiently though not at the first sight so plainely for still in euery kinde there must be one highest which all the rest must settle vpon else there will be no stay at all but we shall runne on infinitely and without end now the Scripture or the Church is the highest thing in this kinde whereon we are to rest for they cnanot be equall then the Scriptures must needs be highest and if they be referred to any at all it must be to themselues for there is none greater nor higher as in the matter of an oath Heb. 6.13 to 16. men sweare by him that is greater then them selues But God sweares by himselfe because there is none greater to sweare by So likewise the Church is referred to the Scripture for trial because the Scripture is higher then the Church but Scripture is referred to Scripture because there is none higher to be referred to nor there cannot be two highests in one kinde for that is against nature and reason too and therefore when the sayings of the Church are referred to the approbation of Scripture it is the referring of them to an higher and so the authority of the Scripture is greater then the authority of the Church The vses are these The first is matter of refutation Vse 1 against the Papists that vsually disparage the holy Scriptures and set them downe too low and doat on the Church aduancing it too high their reach therein is not so much the loue they beare to the Church it selfe but that thereby they might exalt themselues and their owne Church and that their faith might be reputed the onely true sauing faith because their Church teacheth it So that God and his Word must goe downe that they might be lifted vp but if it be true that the Church were aboue the Scriptures yet except they can proue their Church to be the only true Church of God which they are neuer able to doe it helps not their cause It is strange to see and heare what monstrous and blasphemous speaches and positions many of them haue deliuered to this purpose as that the Scripture is of no more authority without the approbation of the Church then Esops Fables Oh horrible blasphemie there are some others of a better kinde that are more modest that say that the Scriptures are to be fitted to the times and the sense thereof is to be altred as the times alter others there are that say that the Churches are not bound to take the Scriptures as true without the allegation of the Church and that the Church hath authority to reiect or allow Scripture and that yee may know that by the Church they meane their Romish church and by that the Pope hearken how blasphemously they ascribe vnto him all power in heauen and in earth that hee may dispence against the Apostles and their Canons and against all the commandements of God in the old and new Testament c. Here the world may see that the church of Rome is that whore of Babilon an impudent and shamelesse strumpet that sets such a brasen face and belches out such whorish filthy blasphemies against God and his Word the very naming of these positions is refutation enough for them in any Christians iudgements To come to their best positions in this controuersie Position 1 First the Church say they is supreme Iudge in all controuersies of Religion but yee see by this obseruation that it is not so God is higher and the Scripture is higher the Spirit indeede is the Iudge and the highest Iudge speaking openly and plainely in in the Word and secretly in the minde and heart of euery beleeuer 1. Ioh. 2 20 27. you haue anoyntment from that holy one and know all things And againe the same anoynting teacheth you of all things Obiect yea but say they are not men sent to the Priests to enquire at their mouhes Mal. 2.7 and is not the Priest the highest Iudge then Answ I answer What are wee to goe to the Priests for for the Law not for their owne Iudgement whereto if they speake wee are to receiue it yet not because it is their saying but Gods Law but happly they can deliuer no other but Gods Law that is flatly contradicted verse 8. where the Prophet saith that they are gone out of the way and haue caused many to fall by the Law yea but say they the high Priest was the Iudge as wee may see Deut. 17.8 12. But hee was to iudge according to the Law as we may see in Vers 11. so that except they will arrogate more to themselues then the messengers of the Lord of hoasts did vnder the law they cannot be Iudge nor Iudges of the Scripture The second position of theirs is this Position 2 That whatsoeuer the Church saith we must take it as a Law and obey it It is true that whatsoeuer the Church saith according the Law and Word of God we must obey it not otherwise The Scribes and Pharises were to bee obeyed as they sate in Moses chaire that is as they taught his Doctrine Matth. 23 2 3. but if they transgresse and bring in the precepts of men and their owne traditions
to the word and the Spirit There must be a perswasion in vs that the Word is of God else there is no profit by it 1 Thessa 2.3.2 Peter 1.19 20. 2 Tim. 3.16 And therefore still the Preface of the Prophets is Verbum Domini And so much shall seue to be spoken concerning the authority of the Scripture The foure and twentieth LECTVRE of the CHVRCH COncerning the power of the Church yee haue heard how it extends it selfe to persons and things for so we diuided it for our more easier proceeding in the point that which concernes persons wee haue already spoken of And that which concernes the thing wherein the Church hath power wee haue entred into and shewed that they are of two sorts eyther matters of circumstance or matters of substance The Churches power in matters of substance are eyther in matters touching Scripture or besides Scripture touching Scripture and that I shewed was of two sorts eyther touching the authoritie of Scripture or the sense of Scripture Of the authority of Scripture we spake in the last Lecture Now wee are to speake of the sense of Scripture which wee shall be the longer in handling because looke what was wanting in the former point shall be here supplyed Touching this point what authority the Church hath in the sense of Scripture it is as materiall and as difficult a point as the former First as materiall for after we are made acquainted which the letter of Scripture so that we know which are Canonicall bookes written by the Infallible direction of the Holy Ghost and that euery thing contained in them is the vndoubted truth of God wee are still as far to seeke in matters of faith as before till we proceed further and be acquainted with the sense and meaning of Scripture for the Word of God is not so much the letter as the sense and the Scripture is not so much the bare written word as the right meaning and vnderstanding of that which is written That what a man saith is his speech indeed in common acceptation But yet if it bee not taken in the sense hee meanes it he will and may iustly disclaime as none of his speech A mans meaning is contained in his words as the things signified in the signe because words are the signification of our meaning but the subiect of them wherein it properly rests and is seated is the breast of the speaker So the Word of God is in the Scripture as the signe whereby God signifies his meaning but the subiect of them wherein properly the meaning of them restes is in God himselfe so that this is a materiall point to be knowne Secondly it is as difficult a point as the former for after we heare which is the right letter of Scripture it is as difficult to know which is the right sense as before it was to know which was the right letter for the same words sometimes haue diuers significations and one and the same sentence may be vnderstood many wayes and diuers men are of diuers minds expounding one and the same Scripture diuers wayes euery man abounding in his owne sense the true beleeuer expounding it to the maintenance of the true Catholique faith the Heretique to the maintainance of his Heresie Yea among and true beleeuers themselues one interprets the same words to that opinion that he fauours and another to a contrary that he fauours What is to be done in this case The Church is here thrust vpon vs as the onely or chiefest vmpyre in these differences and that alone to be the true sense which shee pronounceth And surely I see not but that the Church may as probably and plausibly challenge authority to deliuer which is the meaning of Scripture as which is the letter of Scripture We haue giuen the Church her due touching the former acknowledging her authority in and about the letter of Scripture but not ouer or aboue it and so God willing we will deale as ingenurously in this concerning the sense of Scripture But yet we will limit and bound it within certaine necessary cautions and limitations And that we may doe so we will handle it by way of Obseruation The Obseruation is this Doct. That howsoeuer the Church hath great authority in expounding Scripture yet she must not expound it as shee list and according to her owne minde but according to Gods minde and the meaning of the Scripture it selfe But say some the Church will not nor cannot expound them Ob. but according to Gods minde and therefore this is a needlesse Obseruation I Answer It is true that the Catholique Church that is Answer the whole company of the faithfull cannot do otherwise But particulâ—r visible Churches may and oft times haue expounded Scripture to their owne minde and not according to Gods minde And therefore it is reason that they should bee thus bounded and limited we will proceed then to the proofes of the obseruation And first I will prooue it by rules And secondly by examples The rules in the Scripture are plaine for this note and that first in generall Esay 8.20 To the law to the Testimony c. whosoeuer is the speaker and whatsoeuer he speakes in matters of God and of Religion and therefore specially in expounding Scripture it must be according to the law and the testimony that is according to the meaning that God intendeth therein and so in the 1 Peter 4.11 the Apostle saith Let him that speakes speake as the words of God that is in Gods sense As in generall all must thus speake Gods Word so specially the Preacher or whosoeuer that takes vpon him to expound Gods Word he must speake it as the Word of God that is not onely for the manner of it reuerently and zealously as becomes the Word of God but for the matter much more that is in the same sense that God himselfe hath spoken it as hee being then in Gods stead and deliuering his message else he speakes his owne words not Gods Secondly more particularly Iohn 5 39. Search the Scripture saith our Sauiour he doth not bide them take the Scriptures and reade them and giue what sense of them they thinke good But he bids them search them that is examine them and consider aduisedly of them lay them rightly together weigh one place wel with another and make diligent inquiry after the sense reach that God intends in them And so we shall find that they are first witnesses of Christ and then that they are helpes to eternall life See it yet more neerely Rom. 12.6 Let vs prophesie according to the proportion of faith saith the Apostle whereby prophecy is expresly meant interpretation of Scripture for so it is taken in the 1 Cor. 14.3.31 and that is to be framed according to the proportion or Analogy of faith which whether it be meant of faith contained in the Creede or of the measure of faith that God hath endued vs with all yet still
it is to bee vnderstood that that faith which God hath reuealed in the body of the Scripture must needs be the rule and square of all interpretations And so in the 2 Peter 1.20 No prophesie of Scripture is of any priuate interpretation c. where intepretation of Scripture is named and all priuate interpretations of Scripture excluded now what is meant by priuate interpretations it is explained by the opposition vers 21. but holy man of God spake as they were mooued by the Holy Ghost so that euery interpretation is forbidden and condemned as ptiuate that is not according to the minde of the holy Ghost that speakes in Scripture and see it falls in right with the obseruation as if it were the same words Secondly the examples of the practice of the faithfull is plaine for this Nehem 8.7.8 The Text saith they read in the book of the Law and gaue the sense c. not that they did giue a sence of their owne but they gaue that sense that the Lord himselfe therein intended and so caused them to vnderstand it So in Act. 8.34 35. the Eunuch reading that place Esa 53. hee was led as a Sheepe to the slaughter c. hee asketh Philip whether the Prophet speaketh this of himselfe or of some other acknowledging thereby that the meaning of the Prophet himselfe must be the Rule that he must goe by in expounding the Prophet And Act. 17.11 The Bereans took not the Apostles word no farther then it was consonant to the sense of Scripture but they searched the Scriptures daily whether those things were so And our Sauiour him selfe submitted himselfe to the same Rule Luke 24.27 he expounded Moses and the Prophets to them that is hee did plainely deliuer their meaning for that is the right office of an Interpreter as when two speake together being of a strange language the Interpreter is to tell what each of them meaneth And this being the chiefe office that the Church hath concerning Scripture to interpret them shee is then to giue no other sense of them but that which is the minde of God and the meaning of the Scriptures themselues this is true preaching and this did our Sauiour Luke 4.17.21 hee opened the booke and read in it and then expounded it So much for the proofe of the point The reasons are these Reas 1 first what the Church doth according to her owne will not following the sense of the Scripture they doe it as naturall men for so farre as they are spirituall so farre they follow the mind of God and deny themselues now the naturall man perceiueth not the things of the Spirit of God and the sense of the flesh is enmity against God Rom. 8.7 and when Peter confest aright that our Sauiour was the Sonne of God flesh and blood did not reueale this vnto him Matth. 16.17 and therfore if so be they will find out the truth in the Scripture they must not consult with themselues but with the Spirit of the Lord. Reas 2 Secondly the light of nature affords euery man to interpret his owne words acccording to his owne meaning specially hee that makes lawes is to expound them And is not the Scripture Gods owne Word and is not he the author of all the Lawes and Statutes therein contained And shall wee scantle God of that in this kinde which is due to euery man in the like kinde Shall euery man expound his owne words and interpret the lawes hee makes according to his owne meaning And shall not God doe so much more It is the Apostles reason for the words of the Prophets 2 Pet. 1.20 21. where he saith that no prophesie of Scripture is of any priuate interpretation but holy men of God spake as they were moued by the holy Ghost as if hee should say it is Gods Word and therefore not to be interpreted after the will of man and it may as iustly be applyed to all the Scriptures as to the Prophets because they be all of God 2 Tim. 3.16 all giuen by inspiration from God therefore God is to expound them Reas 3 Thirdly It is so in the iudgement of outward and carnall things because they be of God therefore they are to be proceeded and dealt in after his will and not our owne the iudgement that man giues is not his owne but it is Gods Iudgement as Iehosaphat saith to the Iudges in the 2 Chron. 19.6 7. if it be so in ciuill things that the Iudge must doe nothing but that which God will haue him to doe because it is Gods Iudgement much more in Religious iudgements as about the sense of Scripture it must needes be so for the life of naturall reason is farre more cleare in the other then these yea the Lord himselfe quotes them both together in this case limiting both alike Deut. 17.8 to the 11. If a controuersie arise they must goe vnto the Priest and vnto the Iudge and what they informe according to the Law that they must doe Reas 4 Fourthly the Church is the Spouse of Christ Now the wife must be aduised by her husband and not runne on her owne head So they are the sheepe of Christ and therfore to follow the Shepherds voyce and not to goe before it framing it to their owne fancies and the Church hath the promise of the Spirit no further but as following Gods Word Iohn 14.26 Reas 5 Fifthly the Church hath erred and that most dangerously in interpreting of Scripture and that was when they neglected to obserue the minde of God and followed their owne mind and therefore her owne wofull experience may teach her this wisdome Reas 6 Sixthly By this meanes the Scriptures shall be and are occasionally the author of all heresie for whence haue they sprung but from hence that men haue taken the Scripture and mis-interpreted them in fauour of their owne opinions Yea but what is this to the Church that particular men haue done this Yes for if they may doe it why not the other and these very Heretikes were of the Church when they did thus misinterpret the Scriptures Reas 7 Seuenthly by this meanes the Church shall be found contrary or at least diuers from her selfe two seuerall Churches expounding the same Scripture two contrary waies yea one and the same Church expounding the same Scripture now one way and now another way Reas 8 Eightly It is the practice of the diuell and his instruments to handle the Word deceitfully making merchandize of it turning it to their owne and other mens affections as the Apostle speaketh in the 2 Cor. 2.17 and 4.2 whereas the Apostles and Gods Ministers doe otherwise they make Gods meaning plaine in euery mans conscience in the sight of God So it is the practice of the diuell and his instruments to mis-apply Scripture wresting it to error to their owne destruction 2 Pet. 3.16 So they alleage it quite against the meaning of God as Satan did Math. 4 6. Lastly the sufficiency of
the Scriptures and plainenesse and constancy in it selfe is such that it requires that whosoeuer interpret them they must doe it according to the meaning of God in them and not their owne minde So much of the reasons Vse 1 The vses of this point are many The first is for matter of reproofe and that principally of the Papists and it meets with them two waies First it reproues their opinion and secondly their practice And first it reproues them for their opinion for they esteeme the Scriptures but a dead or killing Letter and the written Word but bare and dead Inke It is the Church say they that is the mouth of the Scriptures giuing it sound and sense and it hath no meaning but what shee pronounceth This is their wicked opinion but the faithfull haue spirituall eares they heare God himselfe speake euen in the written Word It is true that the Church sounds it to the outward eare but God speakes in it to the heart and conscience and they receiue it not as the word of man but as it is indeed the Word of God A dead letter doe they call them O horrible blasphemy Stephen calls them liuely Oracles Acts 7.38 and the Angell Acts 5.20 calls them words of life and Christ himselfe saith Iohn 5.39 that eternall life is in them and that they are witnesses of him If they be dumbe as they say they are then they giue but a slender witnesse of Christ but our Sauiour would haue vs to know that there is a liuing voyce in the Scripture as hee saith Iohn 6.63 the words that I speake are spirit and life I say not that this life is in the Scriptures simply but as it is in the Sacraments to the faithfull Receiuer that is by the promise of God and the presence of his Spirit It is true that the Church is the mouth of the Scriptures as Aaron was the mouth of Moses Exod. 4.16 Hee shall be thy spokes-man to the people hee shall be vnto thee in stead of a mouth and thou shalt be vnto him in stead of God And as the Prophets were the mouth of God Luke 1.70 as he spake by the mouth of all his holy Prophets c. thus the Church is the mouth of God and his spokes-man to the people and so farre shee is to be beleeued But that she is so the mouth of Scriptures as that what sense soeuer shee speakes must be esteemed the voyce of Scripture this is not to be beleeued No the Scripture is not dumb but speakes it selfe Rom. 10.11 the Scripture saith and Rom. 11.2 Wot ye not what the Scripture saith and most plainely Rom. 9.17 for the Scripture saith vnto Pharaoh c. that is God in the Scripture saith to Pharaoh so that the Scriptures are not dumb but the spirituall man heares God speake in them As it condemnes their opinion so secondly it condemns their practice and that in many respects and first in regard of their vulgar latin translation for they impose that vpon the Church as the authenticall Text and Word of God and in the councel of Trent they haue decreed that none may appeale frō it vnder any pretence and that vpon paine of Gods curse It is true that translations are Scripture so far as they goe with the originall Text but that any translation is to be equalled much lesse preferred to the originall Text wherein both the the matter and the words are Gods owne it is absurd And this is a sufficient motiue to any indifferent mans iudgement not blinded and besotted with mysts of preiudice and error that wee are in the right and they are in the wrong because we are willing to stand to the tryall of Gods own Text but they will onely stand to their owne translation refusing the other The second practice of theirs heere reproued is that all their expositors are slaues and vassalls to their Church for in all their interpretations either they must concurre to award with the sense that the Church hath already giuen or if they differ they must vaile Bonnet and say with submission of their iudgement to the church of Rome and then though they doe erre yet it is not damnable because they shew a willingnesse to be better aduised else they are Heretikes and Castawayes it were farre more grace in them to submit themselues to the iudgement of God with intreaty of pardon for that wee haue not attained to the full sense of his words for if any wrong be done therein it is most to him whose words wee haue mistaken and also wee must pray vnto him for further illumination who is the father of lights and in this they would shew themselues to be the good seruants of God whereas in the other they shew themselues to be the seruants and slaues of men Their third practice here reproued is this That in the oath which generally all Papists receiue they doe sweare to vnderstand Scripture onely so as the Fathers ioyntly do expound them and to receiue no other interpretation but that which they doe generally consent in No doubt but the Fathers ioyntly consenting and all agreeing in the exposition of a Scripture It is great reason to moue me to belieue that it is the true sense but yet it is no proofe that I should sweare to it but I aske what one place of Scripture is there that is not manifest by its owne light which is expounded one and the same way by all the Fathers If it be manifest by it selfe wee beleeue it for its owne light and not for theirs but if it be not manifest in it selfe then some one or other of Fathers dissent in the interpretation of it yea but say they if most agree then it is all one as if they all agreed But what if the most dissent from the best must we follow the most to doe euill But in the diuision of the Commandements they follow not the most but leaue all the rest of the Fathers and follow Austin who will haue but three Commandements in the first Table because hee had a conceit of a mystery of the Trinity to be in them But will they beleeue the most and leaue the best this is against Gods Commandement to follow the multitude to doe euill but thus they must doe or else they are foresworne See what dangerous plunges these desperate fellowes put themselues on to vphold the Churches transcendent authority in expounding of Scripture◠but secondly what if they do all generally concur and yet misse in the right expounding of Scripture some of the best learned amongst the Papists challenge them so to doe and we can giue instance of it as in the dangerous heresy of the Millenaries vpon that place Reu. 20.4 that Christ should raign on the earth after the day of iudgement a 1000. yeers now if they follow the Fathers in this exposition wherein they generally erre they must forsake the truth if they
follow them not they breake their oath what a snare doe these men intangle themselues in Lastly if they should neuer erre yet to sweare to the words of men is to inthrall our consciences to men which the Lord alone is to haue the command thereof The last practice of theirs here reproued is that when the Church dissents they rely finally on the iudgement of Councells and Popes for the sense of the Scriptures whereas they are all but men and may erre yea and haue erred one of them crossing that which another hath held and therefore we must not tye the Scriptures to mens humours no let God be true and euery man a lyer let Gods Word expound it selfe and let not vs ty it to the interpretation of men though they be neuer so many neuer so holy so learned so painfull or so great in the Church For that may be truely said of Councells and Fathers and without disgrace to the best of them that is spoken of Iohn Baptist Iohn 1.9 that they are not the light but men that beare witnesse of the light Vse 2 The second vse is for Instruction to teach vs what wee are to doe in this case for now that we haue ouerthrowne the error of the aduersaries wee must set vp the truth of God and therefore this teacheth vs warinesse and care and conscience in meddling with the Scripture and the sense thereof for wee must know that God is dishonoured when his word is mistaken and belyed when it is falsely interpreted and wee must know that God is made the author of sinne and heresie when his Word is peruerted to the maintenance thereof and God himselfe is subiected to man when man presumes of himselfe to expound or to tye his meaning to other mens interpretations Briefely it is light life and saluation if it be vnderstood and beleeued aright else it is death and destruction and therefore wee had neede looke well about vs in meddling with the Scripture and the sense thereof and carry our selues warily carefully and conscionably therein And that first in admitting the expositions of others secondly in making expositions of our owne First in admitting the expositions of others wee must not altogether looke into them with other mens eyes but with our owne wee are not to take any expositions vpon any mans or any churches bare word but wee are to examine their grounds and their reasons whereby they are maintained But some may say If I examine their grounds I make my selfe the Iudge of the sense of Scripture and were I not as good rest on the Churches iudgement as mine owne I answere first that if I doe thus yet I doe not properly censure the Scripture but their grounds secondly I answer that any Church or any of the faithfull may iudge of the sense of Scripture that is as being led by it and following it thirdly I say we rest neyther on our owne iudgement nor on the Churches but on the Scriptures and when the Church iudgeth according to them wee must willingly embrace it if shee dissent from them wee may and must make bold to dissent from her wee haue an excellent example in this case for the receiuing of expositions in that holy Father Austin who finding an interpetation of Cyprians a holy man too not so well agreeable to Scripture and another of Liconius an heretike on the same Text more agreeable thereto refused Cyprians exposition though otherwise hee greatly reuerenced him and receiued that of Liconius though otherwise hee knew him to be out of the right way and said Pardon mee Cyprian I must leaue thee heere and take Liconius exposition not because it is his but because it is Gods This is an ingenuous practice and this we must follow we must looke into other mens expositions with our own eyes and examine their grounds and that without respect of persons Secondly in framing expositions of our owne when we come to the Scripture to seeke the sense hereof we must not come as Lords to command but as seruants to obey not as masters to teach what we will haue it say but as schollers to learne what it selfe doth say not as the speaker but as the interpreter to take that which is spoken to our hand And that we may walke vprightly herein and take such a course as is pleasing to God and worthy of the Scripture and beneficiall and comfortable to our selues let vs be ruled by these directions they are very pithy he that is ruled by them God will reueale his meaning to them so far as shall be for their saluation There are some things that we are to be ruled by before we come to expound the Scripture and some things in the exposition of it and some rules we are to obserue after it I labour to make this point plaine because it is a maine difference betwixt vs and the Papists And also because that without the knowledge of the sense of Scripture we cannot be saued First then we are to obserue these directions before we take the Scripture in hand and that is First we must goe to God by prayer wee must begin with God that he may begin with vs and goe on with vs and leade vs safe through to the end of our businesse pray with Dauid Psal 119.18 Lord open mine eyes that I may see the wonders of thy Law pray for light and for the grace of illumination of him that is the Father of lights Iames 1.17 for thy selfe art darkenesse and pray to him for wisedome Iames 1.5 for all thine owne wit in this case is foolishnes and pray for the Spirit of God that hee may be present with vs and effectuall vnto vs to instruct direct quicken and teach vs for that which is in vs is but flesh and nature and the naturall man perceiueth not the things of God 1 Cor. 2.14 and doubt not but that thou shalt be heard and find good successe for thou hast Gods promise for it Iames 1.5 If any man lacke wisedome let him aske of God and it shall be giuen him Luke 11.13 The second Rule we must be directed by herein is this we must haue a reuerent affection and conscionable respect to the Word wee must consider that it is Gods owne voice one of the holiest things of God a most precious Iewell bestowed on the Church touch it not with vnwashen hands with vnprepared hearts handle it reuerently religiously and charily If we doe thus nothing shall be more profitable vnto vs it shall be life and saluation if not nothing shall bee more dangerous to vs it shall be death and destruction 2 Cor. 2.16 Thirdly be not fore-stalled by preiudice that is doate not vpon some conceipt and be not wedded to thine owne opinion for this will preuent vs of all the good that otherwise we might receiue by the Scripture wee haue an example of this in the Iewes who would not beleeue Iesus Christ to bee the
Shepheards and of Christ Luke 2.19 51. she did ponder and keepe these sayings in her heart And this wil ripen our thoughts digest our readings and conceits as chewing the cud separating the refuse and turning the best into good nourishment The third duty is conference we must conferre of the things we reade and heare as the two Disciples did Luke 24.4 32. for this will reuiue our vnderstanding and quicken our wits and wheâ— our reason and helpe our memories and stablish our iudgement and throw out the hidden substance as it were from the huske and winnow away the chaffe from the wheat And fourthly to these we must adde patience wait the Lords leasure and tarry till he giue the succsse and till he reueale his will to thee and thus doing God will reueale it Phil. 3.15 all this while that thou hast beene toyling and striuing expect and waite vpon God and thou shalt finde the successe in Gods good time thou hauing vsed the meanes dayly labouring and praying for the effect be sure it shall bee reuealed vnto thee when it is best for thee and thou fittest for it and if it should neuer be reuealed to thee yet thy former paines seconded with patience shall make thy state as good in Gods acceptance through Christ as if thou haddest knowne it Fiftly that which strikes the nayle to the head is practise and experience a most certaine guide in all points fundamentall After we haue done all the former rules we must adde practice therefore practise Religion in the obseruation of Gods wayes in afflictions in temptations in the court of thine owne conscience in thy dayly watch in the continuall course and terme of thy life Iohn 7 17. If any man doe his will hee shall know of the Doctrine whether it be of God or no Act. 5.32 the holy Ghost whom God hath giuen to them that obey him Psal 119.100 I vnderstand more then the ancients because I haue kept thy Precepts God wil not see vs erre in Iudgement and practice too in such necessary points as he sees we desire as well to obey as to learne And so much for the second vse which teacheth vs warinesse and care and conscience in medling with Scripture Vse 3 The third Vse teacheth vs thankfulnesse to God that we liue in those times of light wherein we haue so many good helpes for the knowledge of Scripture learning tongues sciences histories wits all of them being at the highest and ripest now And many godly men both at home and abroad yea many Churches haue published their iudgement touching the sense of most places of Scripture And therefore if men will be blind now let them be blind for euer let vs take the benefit of these helpes thankefully and soberly and let vs adde to these the vse of those seciall helps before mentioned then it is not possible that we should erre fundamentally and finally in any truth But there are diuers exceptions made against this Doctrine Obiect 1 first say some all this while this is but priuate interpretation flatly forbidden 2 Peter 1.20 Answ I Answer that is priuate which is of man as we may see in the 21 Verse of that Chapter so that our interpretation according to the former rules being framed out by the Spirit is falsely called priuate that same Spirit teaching vs which teacheth all the faithfull Secondly It is excepted that this is a detraction from the Church I Answere No for any priuate man that beleeueth is of the Church and as the Church must trye the Spirits so must euery beleeuer 1 Cor. 12.10 and 1 Iohn 4.1 and as the Church hath the promise of the Spirit so hath euery beleeuer And this is a sure rule the Spirit doth infallibly teach euery one of Gods chosen first or last euery thing needfull for his saluation he vsing such meanes as the Lord hath appointed Phillip 3.15 It is so in manners therefore it is so in Doctrine each being a part of the truth which God requireth and which the Spirit leads vs into Psal 25.5 leade me in thy truth and teach me for thou art the God of my Saluation And Psal 143.10 teach mee to doe thy will for thou art my God Euery one of the faithfull hath the Spirit to comfort them in their distresse to helpe them in their temptations to perswade them to holinesse and why not therefore to inlighten and teach them the truth Ob. 3 Thirdly It is excepted how doe you know whether such an interpretation be from Gods Spirit or from your owne fancy for any Heretique can and will say as much as you Answ 1 I Answer If the matter bee necessary to saluation the promise of God puts vs out of all doubt Iohn 16.13 when the Spirit of truth is come he will guide you into all truth Secondly hast thou sought and attained that interpretation by prayer Then out of question the Lord will not giue thee scorpions and poyson when thou askest fish Errors when thou askest the truth Thirdly doth it concurre with the articles of faith not doubted of then it is the truth Obiect 4 Fourthly Is it not more likely that a whole Church specially the Doctors and Pastors of it are so guided then a particular man and so are to bee beleeued before him Answ Answer yes If they follow the former rules and yet then they are to be beleeued not so much because they are the Church but because they are directed by those rules sometimes one particular man or two follow these rules but the present Church doth not in this case the one or two are to be beleeued before the present Church as in the time of Wicklife Husse and Luther one or few then deliuering the truth ought to be beleeued before the present Church because they obserued these rules Sometimes the Church doth obserue these rules and particular men doe so too then eyther they concurre and so the truth is directly deliuered receiued or else they dissente and then rather follow the streame then one or two if there be no other reason to the contrary For sometimes euen in this case too one man may see more then many as Paphnutius in the Councell of Nice Againe sometimes the Church obserues these rules and some particular men doe not so In this case particular men are right Heretiques and the other the true Church of God Fifthly It is Obiected that by this meanes we all rest on our owne Iudgement and so haue no faith in God Answ I Answer Our Iudgement in matters necessary to saluation being wrought in vs by the letter sense of Scripture revealed by the Spirit is not our owne iudgement indeede but Gods our frailties wherewith we are accompanied are ours onely but wee are endued with our iudgement from God so that we rest on Gods iudgement now and not our owne Euery man must haue faith of his owne that is though not of his owne by working
yet of his owne by possession and feeling and therefore euery man must haue iudgement of his owne too for faith without iudgement is blinde presumption And must I not rest on my faith in that sense And why not on mine owne iudgement too that is on Gods Iudgement which he hath endued my minde and soule withall Obiect 6 Lastly it is obiected This is strange say they wee heare them confesse that euery man though he be neuer so much inlightned yet he is subject to error and yet euery one of them assures himselfe hauing one Answ no more warrant then another that hee is in the truth I answer so farre as wee haue full assurance that wee are in the truth that is in matters fundamentall so farre wee doe acquit all the faithfull from being subiect to error finally and therefore this is no strangenesse at all And so much concerning this point The fiue and Twentieth LECTVRE of the CHVRCH COncerning the power of the Church we haue heard that it reacheth to persons and things for so we diuided it for plainenesse sake concerning Persons we haue done concerning things we haue entred into them and shewed that the things wherin the Church hath power are either matters of substance or matters of circumstance matters of substance and that either touching Scripture or besides Scripture touching Scripture and that either touching the authority or sense of Scripture Of these two last points wee haue spoken namely concerning the power of the Church touching the authority and sense of Scripture Now wee are to speake of matters besides Scripture which is the last point concerning matters of substance that is the point we are now to speake to matters beside Scripture for though in deede and in truth there is nothing to be held in matters of substance in Religion but what is sufficiently warranted by the Word either expressely or at least by sound consequence and deduction yet because some haue fondly imagined and confidently auouched that such things there are and that it is in the Churches power to ordaine them and because some churches haue vsurped and incroached vpon more authority in this case then euer was granted or comitted to them from God therefore in handling the authority of the Church this point also amongst the rest is needfull to be spoken vnto Matters of substance in Religion are of two sorts some concerning faith teaching vs what to know and beleeue others concerning obedience prescribing vs what to do and practise in each of these the Church hath a great hand where the light of Scripture goes before and where shee followes the Doctrine thereof accordingly but where the Scripture is silent in any thing of either or both these kindes there the Church must be silent too and not desire to speake Wee will deliuer the matter plainly by way of obseruation and that is this namely Doct. that the Church hath no power to decree and ordaine any matter of substance in Religion eyther for faith or for obedience without or besides the Scripture The places that prooue this point are of diuers kindes for plainenesse sake wee will reduce them to these heads first some places ascribe this authority to God alone the second sort commends vs to the sufficiency of the Scripture in it selfe the third sort condemne all adding to Scripture and the last sort condemne all Doctrine so taught The first that ascribe this authority to God alone they are these Iames 4.12 there is one Law-giuer which is able to saue and to destroy and what is it to ordaine matters of substance in Religion but to giue Lawes Lawes I say of the highest kinde such as we must liue and be saued by and who is it that giues these Lawes hee onely that is able to saue and to destroy for so the Law-giuer is there described which being peculiar to God alone hee alone must be the Law-giuer Now the Lawes that God hath giuen are contained in the Scriptures which are therefore called the Word of God because therein God hath deliuered his minde and meaning therefore besides those in Scripture no other Lawes are to be ordained for matters of substance in Religion another proofe of this kinde wee haue Matth. 23.8 10. Be not called Doctors and be not called Master for one is your Doctor and Master and who is that but Christ himselfe Now what is it to be our Doctor and to be our Master It is to teach vs what to beleeue and what to doe that wee may be saued therefore Christ being our onely Doctor and Master he alone is to teach and direct vs in matters of Saluation And in Ioh. 1.18 The Office of reuealing God to man is appropriated to Christ hee onely declares him and the reason is there implyed because he onely came out of the bosome of the Father and therefore he onely knowes the minde of his Father and therefore consequently he onely being of ability and authority to declare it so that whosoeuer takes vpon him to reueale any part of the minde of God hee must shew that he comes out of Gods bosome else hee neither must nor can speake in this businesse that Christ himselfe hath already reuealed that is that which is contained in the Scripture Now that we may know that this Rule is inuiolably to be obserued wee must know that all which euer had to deale in matters of saluation were precisely tyed and and confined to this scantling both teachers and hearers Teachers they must teach nothing in this kinde but what Christ in his Word hath first taught The Apostles and in them all Ministers are forbidden to teach any thing but what Christ commands them Matth. 20.28 that and nothing besides that yea the holy Ghost Christs speciall and chiefe Deputy on earth hee is to receiue of Christ and to shew that to the people Iohn 16.14 15. he shall receiue of mine and shew it vnto you And the Text saith in the 14. verse that he shall glorifie Christ in this as who should say if hee teach ought besides it were a dishonour and disparagement to the Lord Iesus much more if any other should doe so and so the hearers they are tyed to this scantling too for so it was prophesied before Deut. 18.15 The Lord thy God will raise vp a Prophet vnto thee like vnto me from among you euen of your brethren vnto him yee shall hearken And this Prophet is Christ as the Apostle Peter proues Acts 3.17 And this was after confirmed by a voyce from heauen Matth. 17.5 This is my welbeloued Sonne in whom I am well pleased heare him And it is the marke of Christs owne sheepe that they will heare his voyce Iohn 10.6.27 and his onely and not a strangers that is whatsoeuer is spoken not according to the voyce of Christ in the Scripture So much for the first sort of Scriptures The second sort that proue this point are such as commend vnto vs the
bookes by the Scripture and not make any so of her selfe for this she cannot doe The third Position is this That as the Church cannot make any booke Canonicall which is not so of it selfe for she hath no power to deuise adde diminish or alter any part of Gods worship outward passages of Gods worship are much in her power as we shall see hereafter but that she may ordaine any part of his worship besides Scripture or affixe remission of sins or other supernaturall effects to the obseruations and ceremonies which she deuiseth all this is but will-worship hatefull to God and expresly forbidden Col. 2.23 Intolerable hath beene the presumption of the Church of Rome in both these For first they haue ordained besides Scripture Images satisfactons new Sacraments new intercessours new propitiatory sacrifices and sundry other parts of Gods worship and seruice Secondly euen to ceremonies of their owne deuising as to crossings processions ringing of Bels pennance and such like they haue ascribed forgiuenes of sinnes driuing away of Deuils and such like gracious effects wherein consists no small part of Gods worship The fourth point is concerning the customes of the Church custome we know preuailes much in matter of practice and many times they are very approuable and not to be varyed from but vpon good occasion yet in matters of Religion yeelding to customes hath bred much inconuenience as wee see amongst vs profaning the Sabbath by playing and walking in the streets and in the fields after the exercises is growen to such a custome as that men thinke it no sinne and so in other things And to speake plainely customes are but a carnall motiue apt to ouer sway the naturall man but of themselues besides Scripture they are no spirituall motiues to the true Beleeuer The ancient fathers tye vp customes in Religion thus short that they must be agreable to the truth so that where truth and customes agree there they are to be admitted else to be reiected Now what is truth Our Sauiour saith Gods Word is truth Iohn 17 17. then if there be any customes in matters of Religion besides the Scriptures which are the truth they must be abolished euen by the Iudgement of the Fathers whom the Papists would seeme to alleadge for these things yea but say they the Apostle Paul alleadgeth custome 1 Cor. 11.16 but how doth he alleadgeth them Against contentions because contentions are against the Word of God so that custome besides Scripture is nothing worth The last point is for matter of traditions Traditions are one mine Piller of Popery and if they leaue them once they will quickly leaue their Religion too Now if we vnderstand traditions in a general sense It intends the whole Doctrine of Saluation which from time to time hath beene deliuered from the fore fathers to the children of the Church And so we willingly embrace traditions as being the Doctrine contained in the word and so the speeches of many of the ancients are to bee expounded and doe make for traditions But in the particular sense as the Popish Church intends them that is vnwritten verities and matters besides Scripture then so there is no building on them If they be verities it is more then we know and being vnwritten we haue no warrant to receiue them to his point we say first eyther there were no such traditions at all or secondly if there were yet they were needlesse considering the sufficiency of the Scripture thirdly if they were needfull yet they were vncertaine lastly if they were certaine yet certainely they were but the words of men and not certainely the word of God First eyther there were none at all I meane for matter of substance yes say they for substance ye haue something by tradition as the Baptisme of Infants the change of the Sabbath and that so many bookes are Canonicall Scripture c. We Answer wee haue not these by tradition for they may sufficiently be proued by good consequence out of the Scripture As first for the Baptisme of Infants we haue the example of our Sauiour in Marke 10.14 And secondly for the Canon of Scripture we haue that place 2 Tim. 3.16 the whole Scripture is giuen by Inspiration from God c. yea but what place in the word saith that so many bookes are Canonicall I Answer euery booke beares witnesse of it selfe and this place of them all that they are Canonicall Thirdly for the change of the Sabbath we haue Reu. 1.10 where it is called the Lords day so that we haue Scripture enough for these things to satisfie an humble minded man that is not contentious Secondly if there were any such yet they were needlesse for supposing the sufficiency of Scripture which we haue proued before what neede vnwritten traditions besides Scripture Indeed before the Word of saluation was committed to writing It was needfull that it should be deliuered by word of mouth from man to man but the word being now written and hauing beene now written these 1610. yeeres and as much written as euer shall be what haue we to doe with traditions besides Scripture Thirdly if they were necessary yet they are vncertaine for how shall I know that the Apostles deliuered ought by tradition or that the Churches after them be they either de facto or de iure For that which is alleadged from the Apostle in the 2 Thess 2.15 keepe the Instructions yee haue bin taught eyther by word or by Epistle whereupon they say the Apostle left traditions and Epistle I Answere these words doe not imply any diuersity in the things he taught but onely in the manner of deliuery looke what he preacht he writte And whatsoeuer can be alleaged for the Churches after them is but the testimony of man we must know it by history and what certainety is there in that to repose my Saluation vpon Lastly if they were certaine yet all this while they were but certaine the traditions of men and certainely not the Word of God And therefore here is the damnable presumption of the Papists that they by name call them the Word of God vnwritten equall them both in authority to binde the conscience in necessity to be beleeued and obeyed with the written word common sence and reason which is endued but with the least touch of Religion will easily decide this controuersie If we adde heere to determination of councels consent of fathers decrees of Popes and other patches and faynings of Popish Religion the conclusion must be this that either there were none such or if there were they were not beside Scripture but according to it or else if they were besides Scripture then they were no matter of substances nor Saluation nor to be receiued as such The second Vse is for Instruction to teach vs what Vse 2 it is that our faith must be framed by and what euery truth is to be tryed by And that is
them It is a foolish doctrine of the Papists That ignorance is the mother of deuotion it must needs be a blind and gracelesse deuotion in thâ—t minde where knowledge hath not first inlightned the vnderstanding Let vs now come to the fourth and last ballance and therin try our religion and theirs in these seuen instances and that is the ballance of comfort of conscience that is the true Religion that bringeth soundest comfort of conscience for that is the right Gospell that brings glad tydings of peace to the afflicted soule and agrees directly with Christs spirituall office Esay 61.1 The Spirit of the Lord is vpon me therefore hath the Lord anointed me he hath sent me to preach good tydings to the poore to binde vp the broken hearted c and Matth. 11.28 But the Religion of our Church brings sound comfort to the conscience and the Popish Religion doth not so but rather purposely afflicts mens consciences then comfort them terrifying them with a slauish feare nourishing the Spirit of bondage and bringing men backe as it were to the Law againe Therefore our Religion is the true Religion theirs is the false See this in the first instance waighed in this Ballance The sufficiency of the Scripture sets the conscience at rest as hauing all that is needfull to be beleeued or done set plainely before vs in Gods Booke so that we need not wander after vncertainties and doubtings but we may know what wee must trust vnto And the absolute command of Scripture conuinces the conscience that it is well done and both together assures the conscience of him that endeauours truely to frame himselfe thereunto that he is in the right way to heauen and in the certaine state of grace and Saluation Secondly if all be of Gods free grace and not of mans free will then wee are singularly comforted in that all our thoughts desires and workes are not our owne for then they would be loathsome to God who can bring a cleane thing out of an vncleane But they are Gods owne doings and they are the actions of his owne Spirit and therefore cannot but be acceptable vnto him Thirdly if Iustification be by faith alone without mans merits then we haue peace with God Rom. 5.1 And then wee haue assurance of Saluation being grounded not on the sands of our owne merits but on the immouable rocke Christ Iesus and his righteousnes and the fauour of God and the free promise of mercy in him Fourthly if Christ be our onely Aduocat we haue assurance to bee heard Iohn 16.23 and 1 Iohn 5.14 15. and Rom. 5.1 2. for what can the Lord deny his owne Son or us for his sake whereas if we haue other aduocats we know not whether they heare vs yea of many we know not whether they be Saints or no or if they doe heare vs yet wee know not whether they will or can helpe vs yea we hauing no sound warrant to pray to Saints we know not whether the Lord will bee angry with vs for such an vnwarrantable course so fare the worse for sodoing amongst men Fifthly if we worship God in Spirit and truth and not in Images then we haue assurance that we worship the true God and that after the true and right manner And this is the specificall difference of Gods Religion from all other Religions whatsoeuer whereas if we worship in or by an Image wee doe still suspect whether wee doe well or no for euen nature it selfe if it be well marked abhors that God should be reputed a materiall substance and therefore how can God be pleased that he should be so resembled Sixthly if we celebrate the memoriall of the Lords death in our Communion then the benefit of Christs death is effectually settled to the beleeuing soule by the presence of the Spirit and the comfort and strength of the bread and the sweetenesse and comfort of the wine in our stomacke workes an answerable correspondency by the thing signified to the soule and puts vs in possession of it Lastly if we haue the meanes of Saluation plainely deliuered vnto vs that we may see into them with our owne eyes and not darkely as they are amongst the Papists then we know what we worship Iohn 4. Wee walke in the light whereas they poore soules goe on in the darke not knowing whither they goe So wee see in all these foure ballances that their Religion is too light and ours is downe weight And so we see that they are iustly reprooued for censuring our Church to be a false Church because wee haue a false Religion whereas theirs is the false and ours is the true Religion Secondly It is for reproofe of the Separatists They are very clamorous and bitter against vs But I purpose God willing briefly to answer the sum of all their exceptions and to let all their bitter clamours alone Their first Exception is against the constitution of our Church they say it hath a false constitution and therefore is a false Church But this is a false Consequence and can neuer be prooued there be many froggs and mice and other Creatures generated of putrefaction and yet are true froggs though they be not produced by naturall generation And hee that out of the very stones can raise vp children vnto Abraham is able to gather a Church otherwise then by that which they call a true constitution so that the consequence is false and the Antecedent is false too For our Constitution through Gods mercy is true and sound Constitution signifies sometime the state which a thing is framed vnto as the naturall constitution of the Body that is the state condition or dispensation which by the rule of nature it is endued with sometimes it signifies the Act whereby it is to be framed as the naturall constitution of the body that is the Act of Nature whereby it is constituted Each of these are in the Church as being a Body in a borowed sense And the constitution of ours is true in the first sense we haue the Word Sacraments ministry and Gouernment and people professing the true Religion and obedience thereunto And therefore what need we to inquire into the Act whereby wee were so constituted as thereby to disproue the Truth of our Church As for example when I come into a strange place that hath the name of a City and there I see people corporations Ciuill assemblies lawes and orders and a generall profession of obedience thereunto Shall not I hold that a true City though I know not how it was founded and gathered But if it be necessary to be inquired into in the second sense the Constitution of our Church is true and good in that sense also men are truly called and gathered amongst vs by the ministry of the Word but say they they were not so gathered at the first I Answer first if they were not it is no preiudice to vs we are so now
What things are to be warranted Warrants for the cautions conditions and carriage of the businesse are First more principall Secondly inferâ—our warrant Second head and in it fiue Rules The second Rule That is vncomely in one place which is decent in another What is to be reputed decent Order extends it selfe to two things First to things to be done Secondly to persons The third Rule Three wayes how peace is indangered The fourth Rule Three wayes how this rule is broken The fifth Rule The third head and that is the end And there be two kinds of them Two graces necessary for this First wisedome Secondly love When this Rule is swerved from Instances in divers duties Proofes are here vsed because omitted before The sixth generall things concerning the Church viz. the priuiledges of it In this head two points handled 1 handled by way of obseruation Reasons 2 things handled viz. the priuiledges of Church and they be of two sorts 1 humane 2 diâ—r these â—uers sorts generally of two sorts 1. In respect of others both friends and enemies 2. In respect of themselues 1 temporall priuiledges 2. Spirituall priuiledges theseâ— of two sorts 1 common to all the members 2. proper to the true Beleeuers and these of two sorts 1. matters of present possession of diuers kindes 4 The workes God doth for the faithfull 2. matters of future certainties 2. other speciall priuileges added and intreated on 1. concerning the infallibe guidance of the Church by Gods Spirit and so whether the Church can erre or no either in manners or in Doctrine or in both or in neyther Errors of foure sorts 1. what a fundamentall Errors is Errors in smaller matters what they be Difference btwâ—eene them that erre in the foundation and them that erre in smaller matters The second thing is concerning the necessity of being a member of the Church if euer wee will attaine saluation and so whether any may be saued out of the Church or no. Extra fidem Ecclesiae Morn 451. The seuenth generall head in the doctrin of the church viz. the aduersaries and opposites of it This handled in 5. point â— Th◠〈…〉 that the Church of God hath many Aduersaries to oppose it deliuered in a Doctrine Stiâ—ting vp to many duties The second point what these aduersaries are and they are many 2. sort 3. sort 4. sort 5. sort 6. sort 7. sort 8. sort 9. sort 10. sort 11. sort 12. sort Vse 3. The third point which is how these Aduersaries oppose vs. The matter they strike at 1 against the persons of professors 2 against their profession The manner of their opposition â— secretly 2. openâ— 3. The means or weapons wherby they fight against Gods Children 1 carnall reasons and therein 2. Religious pretences and herein 1. Scriptures 2. that they are the Church 3. miracles 3. more grosse dealing The 4. point how the Church is to carry her selfe to her aduersaries 2. things to be done that we may be able to make a good fight What is to be done in it and therein 2. things The 2 worke to be done 2 thing how it is to be done The 5 point how the Lord carrieth himselfe to his Church and their aduersaries How God is with the saith full in many respects How God is against the enemies his Church many waies Vse 2. The 8. generall head of the Church viz. the power and auhority of it And in it 3. things to be spoken vnto 1. that there is a power 2. point what manner of power it is and in it things asserted 1 that it is not humane but diuine How we may know when the Church speakes true or false Two things asserted that power of the Church is not temporal but spirituall The 3. thing asserted that the Power of the Church is limited and scantled within the bounds of the Word The 4. thing asserted that the power of the Church is the greatest power on earth Kings are vnder the power of the Church though they be aboue the persons that exercise it The 3 point is what it is that the Church haue power in it is double 1. ouer persons and that 1 either as members either not come in to admitte Who are to be admitted The Act and meanes of admission This not to be renued vpon any falling away How far the Magistrate may compell Or to repell them Or secondly as come in to keepe them in or cast them out Or thirdly ouer members as Officers to choose or refuse place or displace Secondly the Church hath power ouer things and these either matters of substance as touching the Scripture and therein first touching the credit of the Scripture And herein whether the authority of Church bee greater then the authority of the Spripture Bellarmy de Verbo Dei interpret 246. The blasphemous speeches of the Papists concerning the Scripture without the approbation of the church The Church of Rome is that whore of Babilon The best positions of the Papists in this controuersie Answered How the Church is to be beleeued and obeyed Answered Reasons against it Reply How we must esteeme of the Scriptures How we must esteeme of the Church 4. Wayes how we may know the scripture to be the Scripture 6 Rules concerning our beleeuing what the Church saith of the authority of the Scripture The second thing the Church hath power in about the Scripture is thâ— sense of it and how farre it hath power therein Hieron in Epist ad Gelat cap. 1. Reprouing first the opinion of the Papists The Scriptures speake and haue a voyce How the Church is the mouth of the Scripture The Scripture not dumbe Secondly their practice first in regard of the vulgar latine translation imposed by them as the authenticall Text. Secondly in that all their Expositors are slaues and vassalls to their Church Thirdly in regard of the oath which generally all Papists recâ—ue concerning the exposition of the Scripture The Fathers doe all generally concur and yet misse in the right expounding of the Scriptures Fourthly in that they rely vpon the iudgements of Councells and the Popeâ— in case the Church dissent First other mens and the Churches expositions are to be examined by vs. Ob. Answer 1. Rectract lib. cap. 18. Secondly in framing expositions of our owne we must come not as masters to teach but as schollers to learne to the Scriptures Directions to walke and be ruled by when wee seeke the sense of the Scripture they are of three sortes 1 some before wee come to expound the Scripture they are 7. Things to be obserued in the businesse it selfe How we may consulie with Gods Spirit What is the analogie of faith Things to be doue after Diuers obiections against this doctrine Ob. 2. Ob 5. Of the authority of the Church in matters besides the Scriptures and what is to be held therein The places that proue this are of foure sorts First such as ascribe thâ—s authority to God alone Secondly such as commend
together Act. 15.2 there was a setled forme of Gouernment And so the Church of Philippi Phil. 1.1 was also grown to some perfection and setled forme of Gouernment they had their Bishops and Deacons So likewise the Church of Ephesus Act. 17.28 they had their Elders and Ouerseers Secondly some are lesse perfect as the Church in Creta which had some things that were vnperfect and therefore Titus was left there to redresse things amisse Tit. 1.5 And so the Churches of the Gentiles were not growne to that perfection and therefore the Apostles would lay no heauy burthen on them but that which they should be well able to beare Act. 15.19 yet these were true Churches So that though some visible Churches be vniuersall some particular some more notoriously knowne some lesse knowne some more pure some more corrupt and some growne to some perfection and ripenesse some in their infancy lesse perfect yet all these are true visible Churches so long as they professe the true sauing faith This may suffice for the illustration of the Note Now we come to the proofes of the point and first vnder the Law there was a set place chosen where the Lord would put his Name that is where Religion should bee profest and he dwels there that is as a Father or as a Master of the family begetting children and ruling and gouerning that family by his Word Now what is this vnder the Gospell but this that where Gods sauing truth is profest there God himselfe is present as in his true visible Church Matth. 18.20 Where two or three are gathered together in my Name saith our Sauiour there am I in the midst of them What is a Church but a company of people gathered together in the Name of Iesus Christ And what is it to bee gathered together in his Name but ioyntly to professe his sauing Truth And what are they in the midst of whom he is but his Church For so in Reuel 2.1 hee is said to walke in the midst of the seuen golden Candlesticks And what are the seuen golden Candlesticks but the seuen visible Churches Reuel 1.20 and this is not tied to any one place more then other but wheresoeuer saith our Sauiour two or three are gathered c. be it among the Iewes or among the Gentiles be it generally in the World or particularly in a Parish or House wheresoeuer it is saith our Sauiour I am in the midst of them neither doth hee say that of necessity there must be any great multitude of them if but two or three are gathered together in his Name he is in the midst of them So Act. 2.41 47. there was a true visible Church there was a company of people that receiued the Word that is that heard it and obeyed it and they were baptized that is they did not onely embrace but outwardly professe the sauing Truth and so they were added to the Church that is they were of the visible Church Doe but consider how the Apostle 1. Cor. 1.2 describes the Church of Corinth to them that are sanctified in Iesus Christ that is to those that haue true sauing Faith in Christ that sanctifies them Saints by Calling that is such as make profession at the least to be so with all that call on the Name of the Lord Iesus in euery place which phrase calling on the Name of the Lord generally in Scripture signifies the profession of Gods Religion so that those that thus professe the true Religion are true visible Churches Reuel 1.20 the Churches there are said to be golden Candlestickes Now what is the vse of a Candlesticke but to hold forth the light to be seene of men and this not onely experience teacheth but Christ himselfe teacheth it Mat. 5.15 Neither doe men light a Candle and put it vnder a Bushell but on a Candlesticke and it giueth light to all that are in the house And what is the true visible Church but a company that hold forth the light of the sauing Truth to bee seene by the World And those instances alleaged of those Churches that are some more visible some lesse some more pure some more corrupt some more perfect some more imperfect yet all of them true Churches prooues the whole substance of the Obseruation cleerely and directly And so much for the proofes The Reasons of the point are these First the sauing Reas 1 truth or faith it selfe is the life of the Church therefore they that professe it and thereby make it publikely knowne to the World that the same is the sauing truth and that embrace it they are a true visible Church Secondly where there is such a company professing Gods Reas 2 truth there they haue the promise of Christs presence in a speciall manner Matth. 18.20 but Christ is present no where in such a speciall manner but in his Church therefore such a company are a true Church Againe they haue also the promise of life and saluation Rom. 10.13 but none are saued but those that are of the Church therefore they are a true Church Thirdly the true Church is built on the Prophets and Reas 3 Apostles Ephes 2.10 that is on that sauing faith which they taught and wrote therefore they that professe this faith must needs be a true visible Church Fourthly there Christ is honoured and obeyed publikely as their Head Ephes 1.22 therefore they that professe to be such are his visible Body Fifthly there amongst such a company are the ordinarie meanes of saluation which are no where else to bee found but in the visible Church Matth. 16.19 Sixthly there his voyce is openly heard and in some measure obeyed therefore they are his sheepe and that is his fold Ioh. 10.27 Seuenthly all other societies and companies consist of those that professe such a Calling or Mystery and obedience thereunto therefore they that publikely professe the sauing faith of Christ and the knowledge of his Lawes and obedience thereunto they and none other are the true visible Church of Christ Eighthly the true visible Church is distinguished from all other societies whatsoeuer by this profession of the sauing faith for other companies of men either professe no Religion at all or not the true Religion therefore whatsoeuer company doth professe the true sauing faith and Religion that is a true visible Church of Christ Lastly the particular profession of the sauing faith makes a particular man a true member of the true visible Church as we may see in the example of the Eunuch Act. 8.37 38. he beleeued the sauing faith of Christ and was baptized and so made open profession of it and so became a member of the true visible Church If this profession in particular make a particular man a true member of the visible Church much more in generall doth it make a company of men professing the same faith to bee a true visible Church Vse 1 The Vses of the point are many The first is matter of reproofe against the Papists who lay