thus related In quem alium crediderunt Gentes universae nisi in ipsum qui jam venit Cui enim alii Gentes crediderunt Parthi Medi Elamitae qui habitant Mesopotamiam Armeniam Phrygiam immorantes Aegyptum regionem Africae quae est trans Cyrenem Romani incolae tunt in Hierusalem Iudei Gentes caeterae ut jam Getulonum varietates Maurorum nulli fines Hispanarum omnes termini Galliarum diversae Nationes Britanorum inaccessa loca Romanis Christo vero subdita Sarmatarum Dacorum Germanorum Seytharum abditarum multarum Gentium Provinciarum Insâ—larum multarum nobis ignotarum quae enumerare non possumus in quibus omnibus locis Christi nomen qui jam venit regnaâ— ad Iudaeos Some have sayd and doe yet say that the Church in this sence is a Visible Organicall Politicall body That its visible is confessed both its matter and farme bespeakes visibility as an unseparable Adjunct of its subsisting That it is a body also in the generall sence wherein that word is used or a society of men embodyed by the profession of the same Faith is also granted Organicall in this businesse is an ambiguous terme The use of it is plainly Metaphoricall taken from the members instruments and Organs of a naturall body Because Paul hath said that in one body there are many members as eyes feet hands yet the body is but one so is the Church It hath been usually said that the Church is an Organicall body What Church Paul speakes of in that place is not evident but what he alludes unto is The difference he speaks of in the individuall persons of the Church is not in respect of Office Power and Authority but gifts or graces and usefullnesse on that account such an Organical body we confesse the Church Catholick visible to be in it are persons indued with varietie of gifts and graces for the benefit and ornament of the whole An Organicall Politicall body is a thing of another nature a Politick body or Common-wealth is a Society of a certain portion of mankind united under some forme of Rule or government whose supreame and subordinate administration is committed to severall persons according to the Tenor of such Laws and Customes as that Society hath or doth consent unto This also is said to be Organicall on a Metaphoricall account because the Officers and Members that are in it and over it hold proportion to the more noble parts of the body Kings are said to be Heads Councellors 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the constitution of such a Common-wealth distâ—â—ctly as such it is required that the whole hath the same Laws but not that only Two Nations most distinct and different on the account of other ends and interests may yet have the same individuall Laws and customes for the distribution of Justice and preservation of peace among themselves An entire forme of Regiment and government peculiar thereunto is required for the constitution of a distinct Politicall Body In this sence we denie the Church whereof we speake to be an Organicall Politicall Body as not having indeed any of the requisites thereunto Not one Law of Order the same individuall Morall Law or Law for Morall duties it hath but a Law given to the whole as such for Order Polity Rule it hath not All the members of it are obliged to the same Law of Order and Polity in their severall Societies But the whole as such hath no such Law it hath no such head or Governour as such Nor will it suffice to say that Christ is its head for if as a visible Politicall body â—t hath a Politicall Head that Head also must be visible The Commonweal of the Jews was a Politicall body of this God was the Head and King hence their Historian saith their Government was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and when they would choose a King God said they rejected him who was their politicall Head to whom a sickle was paid yearly as Tribute called the sickle of the Sanctuary Now they rejected him not by asking a King simply but a King after the manner of the Nations yet that it might be a visible Politicall Body it required a visible supreame Magistrate to the wholeâ—… which when there was none all Polity was dissolved amongst them Judg. 21. Christ is the head of every particular Church its Lawgiver and Ruler but yet to make a Church a visible Organicall Politicall Body it 's required that it hath visible Governours Rulers and of the whole Nor can it be said that it is a Politicall body that hath a supreame Government Order in it as it is made up and Constituted of particular Churches and that in the Representatives convened doth the supream visible power of it consist for such a Convention in the judgement of all ought to be Extraordinary only in ours is utterly impossible and de facto was not among the Churches for 300 years yea never besides the visible Catholick Church is not made up of particular Churches as such for if so then no man can be member of it but by vertue of his being a Member of some visible Church which is false profession of the Truth as before stated is the formall Reason and Cause of any Persons Relation to the Church visible which he hath thereby whether he belong to any particular Church or no. Let it be evidenced that the Universall Church whereof we speake hath any Law or Rule of Order and Government as such given unto it or that it is in possibility as such to put any such Law or Rule into execution that it hath any homogeneous Ruler or Rulers that have the care of the Administration of the Rule and Government of the whole as such committed to him or them by Jesus Christ that as it hath the same common spirituall and known Orders and Interests and the same Specificall Ecclesiasticall Rule given to all its Members so it hath the same Politicall interest Order and Conversation as such or that it hath any one cause constitutive of a Politicall Body whereby it is such or hath at all the forme of an Instituted Church or is capable of any such forme and they that doe so shall be farther attended to CHAP. VI. Romanists charge of Schisme on the account of separation from the Church Catholick proposed to consideration The importance of this plea on both sides The summe of their charge The Church of Rome not the Church Catholick Not a Church in any sence Of Antichrist in the Temple The Catholick Church how intrusted with interpretation of Scripture Of intepretation of Scripture by Tradition The interest of the Romane Church herein discharged All necessary truths believed by Protestants No contrary principle by them manifested Profane persons no members of the Church Catholick Of the late Romane Proselyts Of the Donatists Their businesse reported and case stated The Present
latter sence also The plea about Metropoliticall Churches I suppose will be thought very impertinent to what I have now in hand so it shall not at present be insisted on That the state of Churches in after Ages was moulded and framed after the patterne of the civill Goverment of the Roman Empire is granted And that conformity without offence to any be it spoken we take to be a fruit of the working of the mystery of Iniquity But that there was any such order instituted in the Churches of Christ by the Apostles or any instituted by the Authority from the Lord and Ruler is utterly denyed nor is any thing but very uncertaine conjectures from the sayings of men of after Ages produced to attest any such order or constitution When the order spirituality beauty and glory of the Church of Christ shall returne and men obteine a light whereby they are able to discerne a beauty and excellency in the inward more noble spirituall part indeed life and soul of the worship of God these disputes will have an issue Chrysostome sayes indeed that Corinth was the Metropolis of Achaia but in what sence he sayes not the Politicall is granted the Ecclesiasticall not proved nor are we enquiring what was the state of the Churches of Christ in the dayes of Chrysostome but of Paul But to returne If any one now shall say will you conclude because this evill mentioned by the Apostle is Schisme therefore nothing else is so I Answer that having before asserted this to be the chiefe and only seat of the Doctrine of Schisme I am inclinable so to do and this I am resolved of that unlesse any man can prove that something else is termed schisme by some divine writer or blamed on that head of account by the Holy Ghost elsewhere and is expressly reproved aâ— another crime I will be at Liberty from admitting it so to be But yet for what may hence by a parity of Reason be deduced I shall close with and debate at large as I have professed The Schisme then here described by the Apostle and blamed by him consists in causelesse differences and contentions amongst the members of a particular Church contrary to that of love prudence and forbearance which are required of them to be exercised amongst themselves and towards one another which is also termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 15. 21. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 16. 13. And he is a Schismatick that is guilty of this sinne of Schisme that is who raiseth or entertained or persisteth in such differences nor are these termes used by the Divine writers in any other sence That any men may fall under this guilt it is required 1. That they be members of or belong to some one Church which is soe by the institution and appointment of Jesus Christ And we shall see that there is more required hereunto then the bare being a Believer or a Christian 2. That they either raise or entertaine and persist in causelesse differences with others of that Church more or lesse to the interruption of that Exercise of love in all the fruits of it which ought to be amongst them and the disturbance of the due performance of the duties required of the Church in the worship of God As Clement in the forementioned Epistle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. That these differences be occasioned by and do belong to some things in a remoter or nearer distance appertaining to the worship of God their differences on a Civill account are elsewhere mentioned and reproved 1 Ep. cap. 6. for therein also there was from the then state of things an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 v. 7. This is that Crime which the Apostle rebukes blames condemnes under the name of Schisme and tells them that were guilty of it that they shewed themselves to be carnall or to have indulged to the flesh and the corrupt principle of selfe and their own wills which should have been subdued to the obedience of the Gospell Mens definitions of things are for the most part Arbitrary and loose fitted and suited to their severall apprehensions of Principles and conclusions so that nothing cleare or fixed is generally to be expected from them from the Romanists description of Schisme who violently without the least colour or pretence thrust in the Pope and his Head ship into all that they affirme in Church matters least of all I can allow men that they may extend their definitions of things unto what they apprehend of an alike nature to that which gives rise to the whole disquisition and is the first thing defin'd But at this I must professe my selfe to be somewhat entangled that I could never yet meet with a definition of Schisme that did comprize that was not exclusive of that which alone in the Scripture is affirmed so to be Austins Definition contains the summe of what hath since been insisted on saith He Schisma ni fallor est eadem opinantem eodem ritu utentem solo Congregationis delectari dissidio Gâ—n Faust lib. 20. cap. 3. by dissidium congregationis he intends separation from the Church into a peculiar Congregation a definition directly suited to the cause he had in hand and was pleading against the Donatists Basil in Epist ad Amphiloch Con. 44. distiguisheth between 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and as he makes Schisme to be a division arising from some Church controversies suitable to what those dayes experienced and in the substance true so he tells us that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is when either Presbyters or Bishops or Laicks hold unlawfull meetings Assemblyes or Conventicles which was not long since with us the only Schisme Since those days Schisme in generall hath passed for a causelesse separation from the communion and worship of any true Church of Christ the Catholick Church saith the Papist with a relinquishment of its society as to a joynt celebration of the ordinances of the Gospell how farre this may passe for Schisme and what may be granted in this description of it the processe of our discourse will declare In the mean time I am most certain that a Separation from some Churches true or pretended so to be is commanded in the Scriptures so that the withdrawing from or relinquishment of any Church or society whatever upon the plea of its corruption be it true or false with a mind and resolution to serve God in the due observation of Church institutions according to that light which men have received is no where called Schisme or condemned as a thing of that nature but is a matter that must be tryed out whether it be good or evill by vertue of such generall rules and directions as are given us in the Scriptures for our orderly and blamelesse walking with God in all his wayes As for them who suppose all Church power to be invested in some certain Church Officers originally I meane that
the Church-Catholick visible 3. For a particular Church of some place wherein the instituted worship of God in Christ is celebrated according to his minde From the Rise nature of the things themselves doth this distinction of the signification of the word Church arise for whereas the Church is a society of men called out of the world It is evident there is mention of a twofold call in Scripture one effectuall according to the purpose of God Rom. 8. 28. the other only externall The Church must be distinguished according to its answer and obedience to these calls which gives us the two first states and considerations of it And this is confessed by the ordinary glosse ad Rom. 8. Vocatio exterior fit per Praedicatores est communis bonorum malorum interior vero tantum est Electorum And whereas there are Lawes and externall rules for joynt communion given to them that are called which is confessed the necessity of Churches in the last acceptation wherein obedience can alone be yeilded to those Laws is thereby established In the first sence the Church hath as such the properties of perpetuity invisibility infallibility as to all necessary meanes of Salvation attending of it not as notes whereby it may be known either in the whole or any considerable part of it but as certaine Adjuncts of its nature and existence Neither are there any signes of lesse or more certainty whereby the whole may be discerned or known as such though there are of the Individualls whereof it doth consist In the second the Church hath perpetuity visibility infallibility as qualifyed above in a secondary sence namely not as such not as visible and confessing but as comprizing the individualls whereof the Catholick Church doth consist For all that truely believe professe though all that professe doe not truely believe Whether Christ hath had alwayes a Church in the last sence and Acceptation of the word in the world is a most needlesse enquiry nor are we concerned in it any farther then in other matters of fact that are recorded in story though I am apt to believe that although very many in all Ages kept up their station in Relation to the Church in the two former acceptations yet there was in some of them scarce any visible Society of worshippers so far answering the institution of Christ as to render them fit to be owned and joyned withall as a visible particular Church of Christ but yet though the notions of men were generally corrupt the practice of all professours throughout the world whereof so little is recorded at least of them that did best is not rashly to be determined of Nor can our Judgement be censured in this by them who think that when Christ lay in the Grave there was no Believer left but his Mother and that the Church was preserved in that one person So was Bernard minded Tractat. de pass Dom. ego sum vitis sâ—la per illud triste sabbathum stetit in fide salvata fuit Ecclesia in ipsa sola Of the same minde is Marsilius in Sent. Quaest 20. Art 3. as are also others of that sort of men see Bannes in 2. 2. Thom. Quaest. 1. Art 10. I no way doubt of the perpetuall existence of innumerable Believers in every age and such as made the profession that is absolutely necessary to salvation one way or other though I question a regular association of men for the celebration of instituted worship according to the mind of Christ The 7000 in Israel in the dayes of Elijah were members of the Church of God and yet did not constitute a Church state among the ten Tribes But these things must be farther spoken to I cannot but by the way reminde a learned Person with whom I have formerly occasionally had some debate in print about Episcopacy and the state of the first Churches of a mistake of his which he might have prevented with a little enquiry into the judgement of them whom he undertook to confute at a venture I having said that there was not any ordinary Church Officer instituted in the first times relating to more Churches in his Office or to any other Church then a single particular Congregation He replyes that this is the very same which his memory suggested to him out of the Saints Beliefe printed 12 or 14 yeares since where instead of that Article of the Apostolick Symbole the holy Catholick Church this very Hypothesis was substituted If he really believed that in professing I owned no instituted Church with Officers of one denomination in Scripture beyond a single sence v. 24. saith the Apostle I fill up that Congregation I renounced the Catholick Church or was any way necessitated so to doe I suppose he may by what hath now been expressed be rectifyed in his Apprehension If he was willing only to make use of the advantage wherewith he supposed himselfe accommodated by that expression to presse the perswasion owned in the minds of ignorant men who could not but startle at the noyse of denying the Catholick Church it may passe at the same rate that most of the reports in such discourses are to be allowed at But to proceed In the first sence the word is used Mat. 16. 28. upon this rock will I build my Church and the gates of Hell shall not prevaile against it this is the Church of the Elect redeemed justifyed sanctifyed ones that are so built on Christ and these only and all these are interested in the promise made to the Church as such in any sence but is peculiarly made therein to every one that is truely properly a part member of that Church Who and who only are interested in that promise Christ himselfe declares Joh. 6. 40. Joh. 10 28 29. Joh. 17. 20 24. they that will apply this to the Church in any other sence must know that it is incumbent on them to establish the promise made to it unto every one that is a true member of the Church in that sence which whatever be the sence of the promise I suppose they will find difficult worke of Eph. 5. 25 26 27. Christ loved the Church and gave himselfe for it that he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word that he might present it to himselfe a Glorious Church not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing He speakes only of those whom Christ loved antecedently to his dying for them whereof his love to them was the cause who they are is manifest Joh. 10. 15. Joh. 17. 17. And those on whom by his death he accomplished the effects mentioned of washing cleansing and sanctifying bringing them into the Condition promised to the bride the Lambs wife Rev. 19. 8. which is the new Jerusalem Rev. 21. 2. of elected saved ones v. 27. Col. 1. 18. containes an expression of the same light and evidence Christ is the head of the body the
Church not only a governing head to give it Rules and Lawes but as it were a Naturall head unto the body which is influenced by him with a new spirituall life which Bellarmine professeth against as any requisite condition to the members of the Catholick Church which he pleadeth for In that same which is behind of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his bodies sake which is the Church which assertion is exactly paralell to that of 2 Tim. 2. 10. Therefore I endure all things for the Elects sake that they may obtaine Salvation so that the Elect and the Church are the same persons under severall considerations and therefore even a particular Church on the account of its participation of the nature of the Catholick is called Elect 1 Pet. 5. 13. and so the Church Mat. 16. 18. is expounded by our Saviour himselfe Mat. 22. 24. But to prove at large by a multiplication of Arguments and testimonies that the Catholick Church or Mysticall body of Christ consists of the whole number of the Elect as Redeemed Justifyed Sanctifyed Called Believing and yeilding obedience to Christ throughout the world I speake of it as Militant in any one Age and of them only were as needlessly actum agere as a man can well devise It is done already and that to the purpose uncontroulably terque quaterque And the substance of the doctrine is delivered by Aquinas himselfe p. 3. Q. 8. A. 3. In briefe the summe of the inquiry upon this head is concerning the matter of that Church concerning which such glorious things are spoken in Scripture namely that it is the Spouse the Wife the Bride the Sister the only one of Christ his Dâ—ve undefiled his Temple Elect Redeemed his Sione his Body his new Jerusalem concerning which inquiry the Reader knowes where he may abundanly find satisfaction That the asserting the Catholick Church in this sence is no new Apprehension is known to them who have at all looked backward to what was past before us Omnibus consideratis saith Austin puto me non temere dicere alios ita esse in domo dei ut ipsâ— etiam sint eadem domus Dei quae dicitur aedificari supra petram quae unica columba appellatur quae sponsa pulchra sine macula ruga hortus conclusus fons signatus patens aquae vivae paradisus cum fructu pomorum alios autem ita constat esse in domo ut non pertineant ad compagem domus Sed sicut esse palea dicitur in frumentis de Bapt. lib. 1. cap. 51. who is herein followed by not a few of the Papists hence saith Biel. accipitur etiam Ecclesia pro tota multitudine praedestinatorum in Canon Miss Lec 22. In what sence this Church is invisible was before declared Men elected redeemed justifyed as such are not visible for that which makes them so is not But this hinders not but that they may be so upon other Consideration sometimes to more sometimes to fewer yea they are so alwayes to some Those that are may be seen and when we say they are visible we do not intend that they are actually seen by any that we know but that they may be so Bellarmine gives us a description of this Catholick Church as the name hath of late been used at the pleasure of men and wrested to serve every designe that was needfull to be carryed on to the interest which he was to contend for but in it self perfectly ridiculous He tells us out of Austine that the Church is a living Body wherein is a body and a soule thence saith he the soule is the internall graces of the spirit Faith Hope and Love the body is the externall profession of Faith some are of the soul and body perfectly united to Christ by faith and the profession of it some are of the soule that are not of the body as the Catechumeni which are not as yet admitted to be members of the visible Church but yet are true believers Some saith he are of the body that are not of the soul who having no true grace yet out of hope or temporall feare doe make profession of the faith and these are like the haire nailes and ill humours in an humane body Now saith Bellarmine our definition of a Church comprizeth only this last sort whilst they are under the head the Pope which is all one as if he had defined a man to be a dead creature composed of haire nailes and ill humours under an hat but of the Church in this sence so farre It remaineth then that we enquire what is the Vnion which the Church in this sense hath from the wisdome of its head Jesus Christ That it is one that hath an union with its head and in it selfe is not questioned It is one sheepfold one Body one spouse of Christ his only one as unto him and that it might have onenesse in it selfe with all the fruits of it our Saviour praies Joh. 17. 19 20 21 22 23. the whole of it is described Eph. 4. 15 16. may grow up into him in all things which is the head even Christ from whom the whole body fitly joyned together and compacted by that which every joynt supplieth according to the effectuall working in the measure of every part maketh increase of the body to the edifying it selfe in love And of the same importance is that of the same Apostle Col 2. 19. not holding the head from which all the body by joynts and bands having nourishment ministred and knit together increaseth with the increase of God Now in the union of the Church in every sense there is considerable both the formalis ratio of it whence it is what it is and the way and meanes whereby it exerts it selfe and is usefull and active in communion The first in the Church as now stated consists in its joynt holding the head and growing up into him by vertue of the communication of supplies unto it therefrom for that end purpose That which is the formall Reason and cause of the Union of the members with the Head is the formall Reason and Cause of the Union of the members with themselves The Originall Vnion of the members is in and with the Head and by the same have they union with themselves as one body Now the inhabitation of the same Spirit in him and them is that which makes Christ Personall and his Church to be one Christ mysticall 1 Cor. 12. 12. Peter tells us that we are by the promises made partakers of the Divine Nature 2 Pet. 1. 4. we are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we have communion with it that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is no more but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I cannot easily consent Now it is in the person of the Spirit whereof we are by the promise made partakers he is the Spirit of promise Eph. 1. 13. promised by God to Christ Act. 2. 33. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
are enquiring after But because there is very little security to be enjoyed in an expectation of the sobriety of men in things wherein they are or suppose they may be concerned that they may know before hand what is farther incumbent on them if in reference to us they would prevaile themselves of any such notion I here informe them that our perswasion is that this union was never utterly broken by any man taken into it or ever shall be to the end of the World and I suppose they esteeme it vaine to dispute about the Adâ—uncts of that which is denyed to be But yet this perswasion being not common to us with them with whom we have to doe in this matter I shall not farther make use of it as to our present defence That any other union of the Catholick Church as such can possibly be fancyed or imagined by any as to the substance of what hath been pleaded leaving him a plea for the ordinary soâ—ndnes of his Intellectualls is denyed Let us see now then what is our concernment in this discourse unlesse men can prove that we have not the spirit of God that we do not savingly believe in Jesus Christ that we doe not sincerely love all the Saints his whole body and every member of it they cannot disprove our interest in the Catholick Church It is true indeed men that have so great a confidence of their own Abilities and such a contempt of the World as to undertake to dispute them out of conclusions from their naturall sences about their proper Objects in what they see feele and handle and will not be satisfied that they have not proved there is no motion whilst a man walks for a conviction under their eye may probably venture to disprove us in our spirituall sense and experience also and to give us Arguments to perswade us that we have not that communion with Christ which we know we have every day Although I have a very meane perswasion of my own Abilities yet I must needs say I cannot think that any man in the world can convince me that I doe not love Jesus Christ in sincerity because I doe not love the Pope as he is so Spirituall Experience is a security against a more cunning Sophister then any Jesuâ—â—te in the world with whom the Saintâ— of God have to deale all their lives Eph. 6. 12. And doubtlesse through the rich grace of our God helpe will arise to us that we shall never make a Covenant with these men for peace upon conditions for worse then those that Nahash would have exacted on the men of Jabesh Gileadâ— which were but the losse of one eye with an abiding reproach they requiring of us the deprivation of whatsoever we have to see by whether as men or Christians and that with a reproach never to be blotted out But as we daily put our Consciences upon triall as to this thing 1 Cor. 13. 5. and are put unto it by Sathan so are we readie at all times to give an account to our Adversaries of the hope that us in us Let them sift us to the utmost it will be to our advantage Only let them not bring frivolous objections and such as they know are of no weight with us speaking as is their constant manner about the Pope and their Church things utterly forraigne to what we are presently about miserably begging the thing in Question Let them weigh if they are able the true nature of Vnion with Christ of faith in him of Love to the Saints consider them in their proper Causes Adjuncts and Effects with a sprituall eye laying aside their prejudices and intolerable impositions if we are found wanting as to the truth and sincerity of these things if we cannot give some account of our translation from death to life of our implantation into Christ and our participation of the Spirit we must beare our own burthen if otherwise we stand fast on the most noble and best account of Church Vnion what ever and whilest this shield is safe we are lesse â—mxious about the issue of the ensuing contest Whatever may be the apprehensions of other men I am not in this thing sollicitous I speake not of my selfe but assuming for the present the person of one concerning whom these things may be spoken whilest the efficacy of the Gospell accomplisheth in my heart all those divine and mighty effects which are ascribed unto it as peculiarly it workes towards them that believe whilest I know this one thing that whereas I was blind now I see whereas I was a servant of sinne I am now free to righteousnesse at liberty from bondage unto death instead of the fruits of the flesh I find all the fruits of the Spirit brought forth in me to the praise of Gods glorious grace whilest I have an experience of that powerfull work of conversion and being borne againe which I am able to mannage against all the accusations of Satan having peace with God upon justification by faith with the love of God shed abroad in my heart by the Holy Ghost investing me in the priviledges of Adoption I shall not certainly be moved with the disputes of men that would perswade me I doe not belong to the Catholick Church because I doe not follow this or that or any part of men in the world But you will say this you will allow to them also with whom you have to doe that they may be members of the Catholick Church I leave other men to stand or fall to their own Master only as to the Papall multitude on the account of severall inconsistencies between them and the members of this Church I shall place some swords in the way which will reduce their number to an invisible scantling I might content my selfe by affirming at once that upon what hath been spoken I must exclude from the Catholick Church all and every one whom Bellarmine intends to include in it as such namely those who belong to the Church as hairs and ill humours to the body of a man But I adde in particular 1. All wicked and prophane persons of whom the Scripture speakes expressly that they shall not enter into the Kingdome of God are indisputably cut off Whatever they pretend in shew at any time in the outward duties of Devotion they have neither faith in Christ nor love to the Saints and so have part and fellowship neither in the union nor communion of the Catholick Church How great a proportion of that Synogogue whereof we are speaking will be taken off by this sword of their Popes Princes Prelates Clergie Votaries and people and that not by a rule of private surmises but upon the visible issue of their being servants to sin â—aters of God and good men is obvious to all Persons of really so much as reformed lives amongst them are like the berries after the shaking of an Olive tree 1 Cor 6. 7 8
the Gospell and communion thereof CHAP. V. Of the Catholick Church visible Of the Nature thereof In what sense the Vniversality of Professors is called a Church Amiraldus his Judgement in this businesse The Vnion of the Church in this sense wherein it consists Not the same with the Vnion of the Church Catholick Nor that of a particular instituted Church Not in relation to any one officer or more in subordination to one another Such a subordination not proveable 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Nicene Synod Of generall Councells Vnion of the Church visible not in a generall Councell The true Vnity of the Vniversality of professors asserted Things necessary to this union Story of a Martyr at Bagdat The Apostacy of Churches from the unity of the Faith Testimony of Hegesippus Vindicated Papall Apostacy Protestants not guilty of the breach of this Vnity The Catholick Church in the sence insisted on granted by the Ancients Not a Politicall body THe Second generall notion of the Church as it is usually taken signifies the Vniversality of men professing the Doctrine of the Gospell and obedience to God in Christ according to it throughout the World This is that which is commonly called the visible Catholick Church which now together with the union which it hath in its selfe and how that Unity is broken falls under consideration That all Professors of the Gospell throughout the World called to the knowledge of Christ by the Word doe make up and constitute his visible Kingdome by their professed subjection to him and so may be called his Church I grant That they are precisely so called in Scripture is not unquestionable What relation it stands in to all particular Churches whether as a Genus to its Species or as a Totum to its parts hath lately by many been discussed I must crave leave to deny that it is capable of filling up or of being included in any of these denominations and Relations The Vniversall Church we are speaking of is not a thing that hath as such a specificative forme from which it should be called an Vniversall Church as a particular hath for its ground of being so called It s but a collection of all that are duely called Christians in respect of their profession nor are the severall particular Churches of Christ in the world so parts and members of any Catholick Church as that it should be constituted or made up by them and of them for the order and purpose of an instituted Church that is the cellebration of the worship of God and Institutions of Jesus Christ according to the Gospell which to assert were to overthow a remarkable difference between the oeconomy of the Old Testament the New Nor do I think that particular Congregations doe stand unto it in the Relation of Species unto a Genus in which the whole nature of it should be preserved and comprized which would deprive every one of membership in this Vniversall Church which is not joyned actually to some particular Church or Congregation then which nothing can be more devoid of truth To debate the thing in particular is not my present intention nor is needfull to the purpose in hand The summe is the Vniversall Church is not so called upon the same account that a particular Church is so called The formal Reason constituting a particular Church to be a particular Church is that those of whom it doth consist doe joyne together according to the minde of Christ in the excercise of the same numericall Ordinances for his worship And in this sence the Vniversal Church cannot be said to be a Church as though it had such a particular forme of its own which that it hath or should have is not only false but impossible But it is so called because all Christians throughout the world excepting some individuall persons providentially excluded do upon the enjoyment of the same preaching of the word the same Sacraments administred in specie profes one common faith and hope but to the joynt performance of any exercise of Religion that they should heaâ—e one Sermon together or partake of one Sacrament or have one Officer for their Rule and Government is ridiculous to imagine nor doe any professe to think so as to any of the particulars mentioned but those only who have profit by the fable As to the description of this Church I shall acquiesce in that lately given of it by a very learned Man Saith he Ecclesia Vniversalis est communio seu societas omnium coetuum I had rather he had said and he had done it more agreeable to principles by himselfe laid down omnium Fidem Christianam profitentium sive illi ad Ecclesias aliquas particulares pertineant sive non pertineant qui Religionem Christianam profitentur consistens in eo quod tametâ—â— neque exercitia pietatis uno numero frequentent neque Sacramenta eadem numero participent neque uno eodemque omnino ordine regantur gubernentur unum tamen corpus in eo constituunt quôd eundem Christum Servatorem habere se profitentur uno in Evangelio propositum iisdem promissionibus comprehensum quas obsignant confirmant Sacramenta ex eadem institutione pendentia Amyrald Thes de Eccles nom defin The. 29. There being then in the World a great multitude which no man can number of all Nations Kindreds people and languages professing the doctrine of the Gospell not tied to mountaines or hills Joh. 4. but worshipping 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 1. 2. 1 Tim. 2. 8. Let us consider what union there is amongst them as such wrapping them all in the bond thereof by the will and appointment of Jesus Christ and wherein the breach of that union doth consist and how any man is or may be guilty thereof I suppose this will be granted That only Elect believers belong to the Church in this sense considered is a Chimaera feigned in the braines of the Romanists and fastened on the Reformed Divines I wholly assent to Austins dispute on this head against the Donatists and the whole entanglement that hath been about this matter hath arisen from obstinacy in the Papists in not receiving the Catholick Church in the sense mentioned before which to doe they know would be injurious to their interest This Church being visible and professing and being now considered under that constituting difference that the union of it cannot be the same with that of the Catholick Church before mentioned it is cleare from hence that multitudes of men belong unto it who have not the Relation mentioned before to Christ and his body which is required in all comprehended in that union seeing many are called but few are chosen Nor can it consist in a joynt Assembly either ordinary or extraordinary for the celebration of the Ordinances of the Gospell or any one of them as was the case of the Church of the Jewes which met at set times in one place
Guilty in any kind of such a breach or the breach of such an Vnity This then now insisted on being the union of the Church of Christ as visibly professing the word according to his own minde when I have laid down some generall foundations of what is to ensue I shall consider whether we are guilty of the breach of this Vnion and argue the severall pretensions of men against us especially of the Romanists on this account 1. I confesse that this union of the generall visible Church was once comprehensive of all the Churches in the world the Faith once delivered to the Saints being received amongst them From this unity it is taken also for granted that a separation is made and it continnes not as it was at the first institution of the Churches of Christ though some small breaches were made upon it immediately after their first planting The Papists say as to the Europaean Churches wherein their and our concernment principally lyes this breach was made in the dayes of our forefathers by their departure from the common faith in those Ages though begunne by a few some Ages before We are otherwise minded and affirme that this secession was made by them and their Predecessors in Apostacy in severall generations by severall degrees which we manifest by comparing the present profession and worship with that in each kind which we know was at first embraced because we find it Instituted At once then we say this Schisme lyes at their doors who not only have deviated from the common faith themselves but do also actually cause and attempt to destroy temporally and eternally all that will not joyne with them therein For as the mystery of iniquity began to worke in the Apostles dayes so we have a testimony beyond exception in the complaint of those that lived in them that not long after the operation of it became more effectuall and the infection of it to be more diffused in the Church This is that of Hegesyppus in Eusebius Eccles Hist lib. 3. cap. 26. who affirmes that the Church remained a Virgin whilst the Apostles lived pure and uncorrupted but when that sacred Society had ended it's pilgrimage and the generation that heard and received the word from them were fallen asleep many false doctrines were preached and divulged therein I know who hath endeavoured to elude the sence of this complaint as though it concerned not any thing in the Church but the despisers and persecutors of it the Gnosticks But yet I know also that no man would so doe but such a one as hath a just confidence of his own ability to make passable at least any thing that he shall venture to say or utter For why should that be referred by Hegesyppus to the Ages after the Apostles and their hearers were dead with an exception against its being so in their days when if the person thus expounding this testimony may be credited the Gnosticks were never more busie nor prevalent then in that time which alone is excepted from the evill here spoken of Nor can I understand how the opposition and persecution of the Church should be insinuated to be the deflowring and violating of its chastity which is commonly a great purifying of it so that speaking of that broaching and preaching of errors which was not in the Apostles times nor in the time of their Hearers the chiefest time of the rage madnes of the Gnosticks such as spotted the pure incorupted Virginity of the church which nothing can attaine unto that is forraigne unto it that which gave originall unto sedition in the Church I am of the mind so I conceive was Eusebius that recited those words that the good man intended corruptions in the Church not out of it nor oppositions to it The processe made in after Ages in a deviation from the unity of the faith till it arrived to that height wherein it is now stated in the Papall Apostacy hath been the work of others to declare therein then I statet the rise and progresse of the present Schisme if it may be so called of the visible Church 2. As to our concernment in this businesse they that will make good a charge against us that we are departed from the Vnity of the Church Catholick it is incumbent on them to evidence that we either doe not believe and make profession of all the Truths of the Gospell indispensably necessary to be known that a man may have a communion with God in Christ and be saved Or 2. That doing so in the course of our lives we manifest and declare a principle that is utterly inconsistent with the belief of those Truths which outwardly we professe or 3. That we adde unto them in opinion or worship that or those things which are in very deed destructive of them or doe any way render them insufficient to be saving unto us If neither of these three can be proved against a man he may justly claime the priviledge of being a member of the visible Church of Christ in the World though he never in all his life be a member of a particular Church which yet if he have fitting opportunity and Advantage for it is his duty to be And thus much be spoken as to the state and condition of the visible Catholick Church and in this sence we grant it to be and the unity thereof In the late practice of men that expression of the Catholick Church hath been an Individuum Vagum few knowing what to make of it A Cothurnus that every one accommodated at pleasure to his own principles and pretensions I have no otherwise described it then did Irenaeus of old said he judicabit omnes eos qui sunt extra veritatem id est extra Ecclesiam Lib 4. cap. 62. and on the same account is a particular Church sometimes called by some the Catholick Quandoque ego Remigius Episcopus de hâc luce transiero tu mihi Haeres esto Sancta venerabilis Ecclesia Catholica urbis Remorum Flodoardus lib. 1. In the sence insisted on was it so frequently described by the Ancients So again Irenaeus Etsi in mundo loquelae dissimiles sunt sed tamen virtus traditionis una eadem est neque hae quae in Germania sunt â—undatae Ecclesiae aliter credunt aut aliter tradunt neque hae quae in Hibernis sunt neque hae quae in Celtis neque hae quae in Oriente neque hae quae in Aegypto neque hae quae in Lybia neque hae quae in medio mundi constitutae Sed sicut sol Creatura Dei in universo mundo unus idem est siâ— lumen praedicatio veritatis ubique lucet lib. 1. cap. 3. to the same purpose Jusâ—in Martyr 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dialog cum Tryphone The generality of all sorts of men worshipping God in Jesus Christ is the Church we speak of whose extent in his daies Tertullian
state of things unsuited to those of old Apostacy from the Vnity of the Church Catholick charged on the Romanists Their claime to be that Church sanguinary false Their plea to this purpose considered The blasphemous mannagement of their plea by some of late The whole dissolved Their inferences on their plea practically prodigious Their Apostacy proved by instances Their grand Argument in this cause proposed Answered Consequences of denying the Roman Church to be a Church of Christ weighed LEt us see now what as to conscience can be charged on us Protestants I meane who are all concerned herein as to the breach of this union The Papists are the persons that undertake to mannage this Charge against us To lay aside the old Plea subesse Romano Pontifici and all those â—eats wherewith they jugled when the whole world saâ—e in darknesse which they doe not now use at the entrance of their charge The summe of what they insist upon firstly is The Catholick Church is intrusted with the interpretation of the Scriptures and declaration of the Truths therein contained which being by it so declared the not receiving of them implicitely or explicitely that is the disbelieving of them as so proposed and declared cuts off any man from being a member of the Church Christ himselfe having said that he that heares not the Church is to be as an Heathen man or Publican which Church they are that is certaine It is all one then what we believe or doe not believe seeing that we believe not all that the Catholick Church proposeth to be believed and what we doe believe we believe not on haâ— account Ans Their insisting on this plea so much as they doe is sufficient to evince their despair of making good by instance our faylure in respect of the way and principles by which the unity of the visible Church may be lost or broken Faile they in this they are gone and if they carrie this plea we are all at their disposall The summe of it is the Catholick Church is intrusted with sole power of delivering what is truth and what is necessary to be believed This Catholick Church is the Church of Rome that is the Pope or what else may in any juncture of time serve their interest But as it is known 1. We deny their Church as it is stiled to be the Catholick Church or as such any part of it as particular Churches are called or esteemed So that of all men in the World they are least concerned in this Assertion Nay I shall goe farther Suppose all the members of the Roman Church to be found in the Faith as to all necessary Truths and no way to prejudice the Advantages and priviledges which accâ—â—e to them by the profession thereof whereby the severall individualls of it would be true members of the Catholick Church yet I should not only deny it to be the Catholick Church but also abideing in its present Order and Constitution being that which by themselves it is supposed to be to be any particular Church of Christ at all as wanting many things necessary to constitute them so and having many things destructive utterly to the very Essence and being of that Order that Christ hath appointed in his Churches The best plea that I know for their Church state is that Antichrist sits in the Temple of God Now although we might justly omit the Examination of this pretence untill those who are concerned in it will professedly owne it as their plea yet as it lyes in our way in the thoughts of some I say to it that I am not so certaine that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies to sit in the Temple of God seeing a Learned man long agoe thought it rather to be a setting up against the Temple of God Aug. de Civitate Dei lib. 10. cap. 59. But grant the sence of the expression to be as it 's usually received it imports no more but that the man of sinne shall set up his power against God in the midst of them who by their outward visible profession have right to be called his Temple which intitles him and his Copartners in Apostacy to the name of the Church as much as changing of mony and selling of Cattle were Ordinances of God under the old Temple when by some mens practising of them in it it was made a den of Theeves 2. Though as to the plea of them and their interest with whom we have to do we have nothing requiring our Judgements in the case yet ex abundanti we adde that we deny that by the will and appointment of Jesus Christ the Catholick Church visible is in any sence intrusted with such an interpretation of Scripture as that her declaration of Truth should be the measure of what should be believed or that as such it is intrusted with any power of that nature at all or is inabled to propose a Rule of Faith to be received as so proposed to the most contemptible individuall in the world or that it is possible that any voice of it should be heard or understood but only this I believe the necessary saving Truths contained in the Scripture or that it can be consulted with all or is as such intrusted with any Power Authority or Jurisdiction nor shall we ever consent that the Office and Authority of the Scriptures be actually taken from it on any pretence As to that of our Saviour of telling the Church it is so evidently spoken of a particular Church that may immediately be consulted in case of difference between Brethren and does so no way relate to the businesse in hand that I shall not trouble the Reader with a debate of it But doe we not receive the Scripture it selfe upon the Authority of the Church I say if we did so yet this concernes not Rome which we account no Church at all That we have received the Scripture from the Church of Rome at first that is so much as the Book its selfe is an intollerable figment But it is worse to say that we receive and own their Authority from the Authority of any Church or all the Churches in the World It is the expression of our Learned Whitaker Qui Scripturâ—â—â— non credit esse divinam nisi propter Ecclesiae vocem Christianus non est To deny that the Scripture hath immediate force and efficacy to evince its own Authority is plainly to deny them on that account being brought unto us by the providence of God wherein I comprize all subservient helps of humane Testimony we receive them and on no other But is not the Scripture to be interpreted according to the Tradition of the Catholick Church and are not those interpretations so made to be received I say among all the figments that these latter Ages have invented I shall adde amongst the true stories of Lucian there is not one more remote from Truth then this Assertion That all that any one Text of
Scripture may be interpreted according to the universall Tradition of the Catholick Church and be made appeare so to be any farther then that in Generall the Catholick Church hath not believed any such sence to be in any portion of Scripture which to receive were destructive of Salvation And therefore the Romanists tell us that the present Church that is theirs is the keeper and interpreter of these Traditions or rather that its Power Authority and Infability being the same that it hath been in former Ages what it determines is to be received to be the Tradition of the Catholick Church for the triall whereof whether it be so or no there is no rule but its own determination which if they can perswade us to acquiesce in I shall grant that they have acquired such an absolute dominion over Vs and our Faith that it is fit that we should be Soul and Body at their disposall It being then the work of the Scripture to propose the saving Truths of Christ the beliefe and profession whereof are necessary to make a man a member of the Church so as to make them of indispensable necessity to be received if they can from them convince us that we doe not believe and professe all every one of the Truths or Articles of Faith so necessary as expressed we shall fall down under the Authority of such conviction If not we professe our Consciences to be no more concerned in the Authority of their Church then we judge their Church to be in the priviledges of the Church Catholick But 2. It may be we are chargeable with manifesting some principles of Prophanenesse wherewith the beliefe of the Truth we professe hath an absolute inconsistency For those who are liable and obnoxious to this charge I say let them plead for themselves For let them professe what they will and cry out 10000 times that they are Christians I shall never acknowledge them for others then visible enemies of the Crosse Kingdome and Church of Christ Traytors and Rebells are not de facto Subjects of that King or Ruler in reference to whom they are so Of some who said they were Jewes Christ said they lyed and were not but the Synagogue of Satan Rev. 2 9. Though such as these say they are Christians I will be bold to say they lye they are not but slaves of Sathan Though they live within the Pale as they call it of the Church the Catholick Church being an inclosure as to profession not place yet they are not within it nor of it any more then a Jew or Mahumetan within the same precinct suppose they have been Baptized yet if their belly be their God and their lives dedicated to Satan all the Advantage they have thereby is that they are Apostates and Renegadoes That we have added any thing of our owne making profession of any thing in Religion absolutely destructive to the fundamentalls we professe I know not that we are accused seeing our crime is asserted to consist in detracting not adding Now unlesse we are convinced of failing on one of these three accounts we shall not at all question but that we abide in the unity of the visible Catholick Church It is the common cry of the Romanists that we are Schismaticks Why so because we have separated our selves from the communion of the Catholick Church what this Catholick is and how little they are concerned in it hath been declared How much they have prevailed themselves with ignorant soules by this plea we know Nor was any other successe to be expected in respect of many whom they have wonne over to themselves who being persons ignorant of the righteousnesse of God and the power of the Faith they have professed not having had experience of communion with the Lord Jesus under the conduct of them have been upon every provocation and temptation a ready prey to deceivers Take a little view of their late Proselyts and it will quickly appeare what little cause they have to boast in them With some by the craft and folly of some Relations they are admitted to treat when they are drawing to their dissolution These for the most part having been persons of dissolute and profligate lives never having tasted the power of any Religion whatever they have professed in their weakenesse and disturbed dying thoughts may be apt to receive any impression that with confidence and violence is imposed upon them Besides it is a farre easier proposall to be reconciled to the Church of Rome and so by Purgatorie to get to Heaven then to be told of Regeneration Repentance Faith and the Covenant of Grace things of difficulty to such poor Creatures Others that have been cast down from their hopes and Expectations or out from their enjoyments by the late revolution in these Nations have by their discontent or necessity made themselves an easie prey to their zeale What hath been the residue of thir Proselytes What one who hath ever manifested himselfe to share in the power of our Religion or was not prepared by principles of superstition almost as deep as their own have they prevailed on But I shall not farther insist on these things To returne Our communion with the visible Catholick Church is in the unity of the faith only The breach of this union and therein a relinquishment of the communion of the Church lyes in a relinquishment of or some opposition to some or all of the saving necessary truths of the Gospell Now this is not Schisme but Heresie or Apostacy or it is done by an open profligatenesse of life so that indeed this charge is nothing at all to the purpose in hand though through Grace in a confidence of our own innocency we are willing to debate the guilt of the crime under any name or title whatever Unto what hath been spoken I shall only adde the removeall of some common objections with a recharge on them with whom principally we have as yet had to do come to the last thing proposed The case of some of old who were charged with Schisme for separating from the Catholick Church on an account wholy and cleerly distinct from that of a departure from the faith is an instance of the judgement of antiquity lying in an opposition to the notion of departure from the Church now delivered Doth not Augustine Doe not the rest of his Orthodox contemporaries charge the Donatists with Schisme because they departed from the Catholick Church And doth not the charge rise up with equall efficacy against you as them At least doth it not give you the nature of Schisme in another sence then is by you granted The Reader knows sufficiently if he hath at al taken notice of these things whereto find this cloud scattered without the least annoyance or detriment to the Protestant cause or of any concerned in that name however by lesser differences diversified among themselves I shall not repeate what by others hath been at large insisted on In briefe put the whole Church of
have found out new ways of justifying our separation from Rome on principles of limiting the Jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome to a peculiar Patriarchat and granting a power to Kings or Nations to erect a Patriarchate or Metropolitan within their own Territories and the like the Protestant cause is not concerned in their Plea the whole of it on both hands being forraigne to the Scripture relating mostly to humane constitutions wherein they may have liberty to exercise their Witts and Abilities Not receding from what hath by others solidly been pleaded on the Answers above mentioned in answer to the principles I have hitherto evinced I shall proceed to give my account of the Argument proposed That we mistake not I only premise that I take Schisme in this Argument in the notion and sense of the Scripture precisely wherein alone it will reach the Consciences and bear the weight of inferring damnation from it 1. Then I wholly deny the Major Prop. as utterly false in what sense soever that expression True Church of Christ is taken Take it for the Catholick Church of Christ I deny that any one who is once a true member of it can utterly forsake its communion no living member of that body of Christ can perish and on supposition it could doe so it would be madnesse to call that crime Schisme nor is this a meer deniall of the Assertion but such as is attended with an invincible Truth for its maintenance Take it for the generall visible Church of Christ the voluntary forsaking of its communion which consists in the profession of the same faith is not Schisme but Apostacy and the thing it selfe is to be removed from the question in hand And as for Apostates from the faith of the Gospell we question not their damnation it sleepeth not who ever call'd a Christian that turned Jew or Mahumetan a Schismatick Take it for a particular Church of Christ I deny 1. That Separation from a particular Church as such as meerly separation is Schisme or ought to be so esteemed though perhaps such separation may proceed from Schisme and be also attended with other evills 2. That however separation upon jusâ— cause and ground from any Church is no Schisme This is granted by all Persons living Schisme is causelesse say all men however concerned And herein is a truth uncontroulable Separation upon just cause is a duty and therefore cannot be Schisme which is alwayes a sinne Now there are 500 things in the Church of Rome whereof every one grafted as they are there into the stock principle of imposition on the practice and confession of men is a sufficient cause of separation from any particular Church in the world yea from all of them one after another should they all consent unto the same thing impose it in the same manner if therebe any Truth in that Maxime It is better to obey God then man 2 I wholy deny the Minor Proposition also if spoken in reference to the Church of Rome Though I willingly acknowledge our separation to be voluntary from them no more being done then I would doe over againe this day God assisting me were I called unto it But separation in the sense contended about must be from some sâ—ate and condition of Christs Institution from communion with a Church which we held by his appointment otherwise it will not be pleaded that it is a Schisme at least not in a Gospell sense Now though our Forefathers in the faith we professe lived in sub ection to the Pope of Rome or his subordinate engines yet they were not so subject to them in any way or state instituted by Christ so that the relinquishment of that State can possibly be no such separation as to be termed Schisme For I wholy deny that the Papacy exercising its power in its supreame and subordinate Officers which with them is their Church is a Church at all of Christs appointment or any such thing And when they prove it is so I will be of it So that when our Forefathers withdrew their neck from his Tyrannicall yoke and forsook the practice of his abominations in the worship of God they forsook no Church of Christs institution they relinquished no communion of Christs appointment A man may possibly forsake Babylon and yet not forsake Sion For the Aggravations of the sinne of Schisme from some Ancient Writerâ— Austin and Optatus men interested in the contests about it Leo and Innocent gaining by the notion of it then growing in the World Thomas Aquinas and such vassalls of the Papacy we are not concerned in them what the Lord speaks of it that we judge concerning it It is true of the Catholicâ— Church alwaies that out of it no salvation it being the Society of them that shall be saved and of the visible Church in generall in some sense and cases Seeing with the heart man believeth to Righteousnesse and with the mouth confession is made unto Salvation But of a particular Church in no sense unlesse that of contempt of a known duty and to imagine Peter to speak of any such thing is a fancy The consequence of this devesting the Roman Synogogue of the priviledges of a true Church in any sense arising in the thoughts of some to a denyall of that ministry which we have at this day in England must by the way a little be considered For my part be it spoken without offence If any man hath nothing to plead for his ministry but meerly that successive Ordination which he hath received through the Church of Rome I cannot see a stable bottome of owning him so to be I do not say if he will plead nothing â—lse but if he hath nothing else to plead He may have that which indeed constitutes him a Minister though he will not ownâ— that so it doth Nor doth it come here into enquiry whether there were not a true Ministry in some all along under the Papacy distinct from it as were the thousands in Israell in the days of Elijah when in the ten Tribes as to the publick worship there was no true Ministry at all Nor is it said that any have their Ministry from Rome aâ— though the Office which is an Ordinance of Christ was instituted by Antichrist But the question is whether this be a sufficient and good basis and foundation of any mans interest in the office of the Ministry that he hath received Ordination in a succession through the administration of not the woman flying into the Wildernesse under the persecution of Antichrist not of the two witnesses prophesying all along under the Roman Apostacy not from them to whom we succeed in doctrine as the Waldenses but the Beast it selfe the persecuting Church of Rome the Pope and his adherents who were certainly Administrators of the Ordination pleaded for So that in doctrine we should succeed the persecuted Woman and in Office the perseâ—uting Beast I shall not plead this at
amongst themselves for love is the bond of perfectnesse Col. 3. 14. Hence then it appears what is the Vnion of such a Church and what is the communion to be observed therein by the appointment of Jesus Christ The joynt consent of all the members of it in obedience to the command of Christ from a principle of Love to walk together in the universall celebration of all the Ordinances of the worship of God instituted and appointed to be celebrated in such a Church and to performe all the duties and offices of Love which in reference to one another in their respective stations and places are by God required of them and doing so accordingly See Phil. 2. 1 2 3. cap. 4. 1 2 3. 1 Cor 1. 10. 2 Cor. 13. 11. Rom. 15. 5. Whereas there are in these Churches some Rulers some Ruled some eyes some hands in this Body some parts visibly comely some uncomely upon the account of that variety of gifts and graces which is distributed to them in the performance of duties regard is to be had to all the particular Rules that are given with respect to men in their severall places and distributions Herein doth the Vnion of a particular Church consist herein have the members of it communion among themselves and with the whole 4. I shall farther grant and adde hereunto Over and above the Vnion that is between thâ— members of severall particular Churches by vertue of their interest in the Church Catholick which draws after it a necessity of the occasionall exercise of duties of Love one towards another and that Communion they have as members of the generall Church visible in the profession of the Faith once delivered unto the Saints There is a Communion also to be observed between these Churches as such which is sometimes or may be exerted in their Assemblies by their Delegates for declaring the sense and determining things of joynt concernment unto them Whether there ought to be an ordinary combination of the Officers of these Churches invested with the Power for the disposall of things Persons that concerne one or more of them in severall subordinations by the institution of Christ as it is not my judgement that so there is so it belongs not unto my present undertaking at all to debate That which alone remaines to be done is to consider what is our concernment as to the breach of this Vnion which we professe to be appointed by Jesus Christ and that both as we are Protestants as also farther differenced according to the intimations given at the entrance of this Discourse What hath already been delivered about the nature of Schisme and the Scripture Notion of it might well suffice as to our Vindication in this businesse from any charge that we are or seem obnoxious unto But because I have noâ— reason to suppose that some men will be so favourable unto us as to take paines for the improvement of principles though in themselves clearely evinced on our behalfe The application of them to some present cases with the removall of objections that lye against my intendment must be farther added Some things there are which upon what hath been spoken I shall assume and suppose as granted in Thesi untill I see them otherwise disproved then as yet I have done Of these the first is That the departing or secession of any man or men from any particular Church as to that communion which is peculiar to such a Church which he or they have had therewith is no where called Schisme nor is so in the nature of the thing it selfe as the generall signification of the word is restrained by its Scripture use but is a thing to be judged receive a little according to the causes and circumstances of it 2. One Churches refusing to hold that communion with another which ought to be between them is not Schisme properly so called 3. The departure of any man or men from the Society or Communion of any Church whatever so it be done without strife variance judging and condemning of others because according to the light of their Consciences they cannot in all things in them worship God according to his minde cannot be rendred evill but from circumstances taken from the persons so doing or the way and manner whereby and wherein they doe it Unto these I adde that if any one can shew and evince that we have departed from and left the communion of any particular Church of Christ with which we ought to walke according to the order above mentioned or have disturbed and broken the Order and Vnion of Christs Institution wherein we are or were inwrapped we put our selves on the mercy of our judges The Consideration of what is the charge on any of us on this account was the first thing aymed at in this Discourse and as it was necessary from the Rules of the method wherein I have proceeded comes now in the last place to be put to the issue and triall which it shall in the Next Chapter CHAP. VIII Of the Church of England The charge of Schisme in the name thereof Proposed and considered Severall considerations of the Church of England In what sence we were members of it Of Anabaptisme The subjection due to Bishops Their power examined It s orginall in this Nation Of the Ministeriall power of Bishops It s present continuance Of the Church of England what it is It s description Forme peculiar and constitutive Answer to the charge of Schisme on separation from it in its Episcopall constitution How and by what means it was taken away Things necessary to the constitution of such a Church proposed and offered to proofe The second way of constituting a nationall Church Considered Principles agreed on and consented unto between the parties at variance on this account Judgement of Amiraldus in this case Inferences from the common principles before consented unto The case of Schisme in reference to a Nationall Church in the last sense debated Of particular Churches and separation from them On what accounts Justifiable No necessity of joyning to this or that Separation from some so called required Of the Church of Corinth The duty of its members Austins Judgement of the practice of Elijah The last objection waved Inferences upon the whole THat which first presents it selfe is a plea against us in the name of the Church of England and those intrusted with the Reiglment thereof as it was setled and established some yeares since the summe whereof if I mistake not amounts to thus much You were sometimes members and Children of the Church of England lived in the communion thereof professing obedience thereunto according to its Rules and Canons you were in an orderly subjection to the Arcsh-Bishops Bishops and those acting under them in the Hierarchie who were officers of that Church in that Church you were baptized and joyned in the outward worship celebrated therein but you have now voluntarily
and of your own accord forsaken and renounced the communion of this Church cast off your subjection to the Bishops and Rulers rejected the forme of worship appointed in that Church that great bond of its communion and set up separated Churches of your own according to your pleasures and so are properly Schismaticks This I say if I mistake not is the summe of the charge against us on the account of of our late attempt for Reformation and reducing of the Church of Christ to its primitive institution which we professe our aime in singlenesse of heart to have been and leave the judgement of it unto God To acquit our selves of this imputation I shall declare 1. How farre we owne our selves to have been or to be members or Children as they speake of the Church of England as it is called or esteemed 2. What was the subjection whein we or any of us stood or might be supposed to have stood to the Prelates or Bishops of that Church And then I shall 3. Put the whole to the issue and enquiry whether we have broken any bond or order which by the institution and appointment of Jesus Christ we ought to have preserved entire unviolated not doubting but that on the whole matter in difference we shall finde the charge mannaged against us to be resolved wholy into the Pruâ—ence and interest of some men wherein our Consciences are not concerned As to the first proposall the severall considerations that the Church of England may fall under will make way for the determination of our Relation thereunto 1. There being in this Country of England much people of God many of his Elect called and Sanctified by and through the Spirit and blood of Christ with the washing of water and the Word so made true living members of the mysticall body or Catholick Church of Christ holding him as a spirituall Head receiving influences of life and grace from him continually they may be called though improperly the Church of England that is that part of Christs Catholick Church militant which lives in England In this sense it is the desire of our soules to be found and to abide members of the Church of England to keep with it whilst we live in this world the Vnity of the Spirit in the bond of Peace Hierusalem which is above is the Mother of us all and one is our Father which is in Heaven one is our Head Soveraigne Lord and Ruler the dearly beloved of our Soules the Lord Jesus Christ If we have grieved offended troubled the least member of this Church so that he may justly take offence at any of our waies we professe our readinesse to lye at his or their feet for Reconciliation according to the mind of Christ If we bear not love to all the Members of the Church of England in this sense without dissimulation yea even to them amongst them who through mistakes and darknesse have on severall accounts designed our harme and ruine if we rejoyce not with them and suffer not with them however they may be differenced in and by their opinions or walkings if we desire not their good as the good of our own Soules and are not ready to hold any communion with them wherein their and our Light will give and afford unto us peace mutually if we judge condemne despise any of them as to their Persons Spirituall state and Condition because they walk not with us let us be esteemed the vilest Schismaticks that ever lived on the face of the Earth But as to our membership in the Church of England on this account we stand or fall to our own master 2. The Rulers Governors Teachers and Body of the People of this Nation of England having by Laws Professions and publick Protestations cast off the Tyranny Authority Doctrine of the Church of Rome with its Head the Pope joyntly assented unto and publickly professed the doctrine of the Gospell as expressed in their publick Confession variously attested and confirmed declaring their profession by that publick confession Preaching Laws and Writings suitable thereunto may also be called on good account the Church of England In this sense we professe ourselves members of the Church of England as professing and adhering to that Doctrine of Faith in the Unity of it which was here established and declared as was before spoken As to the attempt of some who accuse us for everting of fundamentalls by our doctrine of Election by the free grace of God of effectuall Redemption of the Elect only conversion by the irresistible efficacy of Grace and the associate doctrines which are commonly known we suppose the more sober part of our Adversaries will give them little thanks for their pains therein If for no other Reason yet at least because they know the cause they have to mannage against us is weakned thereby Indeed it seems strange to us that we should be charged with Schisme from the Church of England for endeavouring to reforme our selves as to something relating to the worship of God by men everting and denying so considerable a portion of the Doctrine of that Church which we sacredly retaine entire as the most urgent of our present Adversaries doe In this sense I say we still confesse our selves members of the Church of England nor have we made any separation from it but do daily labour to improve and carry on the light of the Gospell which shines therein and on the account whereof it is renowned in the world 3. Though I know not how proper that expression of Children of the Church may be under the New Testament nor can by any meanes consent unto it to the urging of any obedience to any Church or Churches whatsoever on that account no such use being made of that consideration by the Holy Ghost nor any parallell unto it insisted on by him yet in a generall sence so farre as our receiving our Regeneration and new birth through the grace of God by the preaching of the Word and the saving truths thereof here professed with the seale of it in our baptisme may be signified by that expression we owne our selves to have been and to be Children of the Church of England because we have received all this by the administration of the Gospell here in England as dispensed in the severall Assemblyes therein And are contented that this concession be improved to the utmost Here indeed are we left by them who renounce the Baptisme they have received in their infancy repeat it again amongst themselves Yet I suppose that He who upon that single account will undertake to prove them Schismaticall may find himselfe intangled Nor is the case with them exactly as it was with the Donatists They doe the same thing with them but not on the same Principles The Donatists rebaptized those who came to their societies because they professed themselves to believe that all Administration of Ordinances not in their Assemblyes was null
one another hath been the greatest ball of strife and most effectu-all engine of difference and distance between us may be a meanes to reconcile in Love them that truely feare God though engaged in severall wayes as to some particulars I confesse I have not any great hope of much successe on this account for let principles and ways be made as evident as if he that wrote them carryed the Sunne in his hand yet whilst men are forestalled by prejudices and have their affections and spirits engaged suitably thereunto no great alteration in their minde and wayes on the clearest conviction whatever is to be expected All our hearts are in the hand of God and our expectations of what he hath promised are to be proportioned to what he can effect not to what of outward meanes we see to be used 4. To conclude what vaine janglings men are endlesly engaged in who will lay their own false hypotheses and preconceptions as a ground of farther procedure is also in part evident by what hath been delivered Hence for instance is that doubty dispute in the world whether a Schismatick doth belong to the Church or noe which for the most part is determined in the Negative when it is impossible a man should be so but by vertue of his being a Church Member A Church is that alienum solum wherein that evill dwelleth The most of the enquiries that are made and disputed on whether this or that sort of men belongs to the Church or no are of the same value and import He belongs to the Church Catholick who is united to Christ by the spirit and none other And he belongs to the Church Generall visible who makes profession of the faith of the Gospell and destroyes it not by any thing of a just inconsistency with the beliefe of it And he belongs to a Particular Church who having been in a due order joyned thereunto hath neither voluntarily deserted it nor been judicially ejected out of it Thus one may be a member of the Church Catholick who is no member of the generall visible Church nor of a particular Church as an elect infant sanctifyed from the womb dying before baptisme and one may be a member of the Church generall visible who is no member of the Church Catholick nor of a particular Church as a man making profession of the true faith yet not united to Christ by the Spirit nor joyned to any particular visible Church or he may be also of the Catholick Church and not of a particular as also of a particular Church and not of the Catholick And a man may every true believer walking orderly ordinarily is a member of the Church of Christ in every sence insisted on of the Catholick Church by a Union with Christ the head of the visible Generall Church by his profession of the Faith and of a particular Congregation by his voluntary assotiating himselfe therewith according to the will and appointment of our Lord Jesus Christ FINIS Reader In the Authors absence many errors and mistakes obscuring or perverting the sence of the places where they are have escaped the presse which thou art desired to correct according as here directed PAg. 2. l. 20. r. and p. 3. l. 14. man p. 5. l. 22. clamorous p. 7. l. 6. vobis p. 9. l. 19. Lutherans Sacramentarian p. 11. l. 21 establish it p. 13. l. 8. conducingnesse p. 15. l. 2. the present p. 16. l. 12. Yea I p. 22. l. 18. His word p. 24. l. 8. Scissure p. 29. l. 18. extended is of p. 31. l. 17. unity of the p. 36. l. 5. dele among l. 13. Metropolitans p. 39. l. 22. dele if p. 42. l. 1. instructed by Authority from their p. 43. l. 2. is not p. 50. l. 26. that shall be pleased to consider p. 54. l. 18. other promises p. 60. l. 24. in the civil state to p. 64. l. 22. our fore-fathers p. 73. l. 13. dele of l. 25. scriptures p. 75. l. 7. nor are they not at all l. 16. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 38. l. 24. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 88. l. 1. dele sence v. 24. saith the Apostle I fill up that l. 12. repartees l. 21. Church there is no promise made to the Church p. 90. l. 1. sence v. 24. saith the Apostle I fill up that p. 91 l. 4. Sion p. 93. l. 10. that it hath an p. 101. l. 13. dispute men p. 102. l. 19. is in p. 110. l. 28. moats p. 124. l. 28. Juvenalis p. 126. l. 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 131. l. 20. hath been p. 133. l. 18. summed up p. 134. l. 15. men p. 146. l. 15. ad Judaeos p. 155. l. ult Scripture p. 160. l. 13. Catholick Church p. 166. l. 20. their writing l. 21. a sweet p. 168. l. 28. have not only p. 169. l. 24. begun p. 172. l. 6. sport l. 8. institutions l. 9. language p. 173. l. 18. Gentlemen p. 176. l. 15. do that p. 180. l. 9. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 185. l. 19. another p. 186. l. 10. to its p. 189. l. 2. Athenaeus l. 3. Thrasilaus p. 192. l. 13. Patriarchs or Metropolitans l. 29. Conscience p. 194. l. 13 14. are there p. 198. l. 15. Scriptures p. 199. l. 24 25. the gifts of his spirit p. 200. l. 14. due to Elders p. 202. l. 7. those many Churches p. 204. l. 1. it seemes 205. l. 17. dele his p. 215. l. 18. is the union enquired after p. 216. l. 17. their sence l. 21. dele the p. 218. l. 2. a Title p. 229. l. 24. your severall p. 234. l. 13. if I have p. 236. l. 16. the unity consists l. 25. visible Church p. 240. l. 21. nor conc p. 242. l. 1. any man may p. 244. l. 24. dele as p. 245. l. 1. Dio Cassius l. 15. there be a p. 247. l. 23. one civile p. 256. l. 20. commit p. 264. l. 2. drive l. 10. or on any l. 17. their administrations §. 1. § 2. §. 3. §. 4. §. 5. §. 6. §. 7. §. 8. §. 9. §. 10. §. 11. §. 12. §. 13. §. 14. §. 15. §. 16. §. 17. §. 18. §. 19. §. 1. §. 2. §. 3. §. 4. * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chronic. Antioch Joh. Male p. 98. A. MS. Bib. Bod. §. 5. §. 6. §. 7. §. 8. §. 9. §. 10. §. 11. §. 12. §. 13. §. 14. §. 15. §. 16. §. 17. §. 18. §. 19. §. 20. §. 21. §. 22. §. 23. §. 24. §. 25. §. 26. §. 27. §. 28. §. 29. §. 30. §. 31. §. 32 §. 33. §. 34. §. 35. §. 36. §. 37. §. 38. §. 39. §. 40. §. 41. §. 42. §. 43. §. 44. §. 45. §. 46. §. 47. §. 48. §. 1. §. 2. §. 3. §. 4. §. 5. §. 6. §. 7. §. 8. §. 9. §. 10. §. 11. §. 12. §. 1. §. 2. §. 3. §. 4. §. 5. §. 6. §. 7. §. 8. §. 9. §. 10. §. 11. §. 12. §. 13. §. 14. §. 15. §. 16. §. 16. §. 17. §. 18. §. 19. §. 20. §. 21. §. 22. §. 23. §. 24. Ille Coetus Christianorum qui solus in orbe clareâ— regeneratis est ecclesia solus Coetus Christianorum papae subditorum Claret regeneratis ergo prob apud illas solos sunt qui miracula faciunt ergo Val Mag. Deut. 13. 1 2. Mat. 7. 22 23. Exod. 3. 7. §. 25. §. 26. §. 27. §. 28. §. 29. §. 30. §. 1. §. 2. §. 3. §. 4. §. 5. §. 6. §. 7. §. 8. §. 9. §. 10. §. 11. §. 12. §. 13. §. 14 §. 15. §. 16. §. 17. §. 18. §. 19. §. 20. §. 21. §. 22. §. 23. §. 24. §. 25. §. 26. §. 27. §. 28. §. 29. §. 30. §. 31. §. 32. §. 33. §. 34. §. 35. §. 36. §. 3◠§. 38. §. 39. §. 40. §. 41 §. 42. §. 1. §. 2. §. 3. §. 4. §. 5. §. 6. §. 7. §. 8. §. 9. §. 10. §. 11. §. 12. §. 13. §. 14. §. 15. §. 16. §. 17. §. 18. §. 19. §. 20. §. 21. §. 22. §. 23. §. 24. §. 25. §. 26. §. 27. §. 28. §. 29. §. 30. § 31. §. 32. §. 33. §. 34. §. 35. §. 36. * Si quis aut privatus aut populus eorum decretâ—â— non stetit sacrificiis interdicunt Haec paena apud eos est gravissima quibus ita est interdictum ii numero impiorum sceleratorum habentur ab iis omnes decedunt aditum eorum sermonemque defugiunt ne quid ex contagione incommodi accipiant neque iis petentibus jus redditur neque honos ullus communicatur His autem omnibus Drâ—dibus praeest unus qui summam inter eos habet Authoritatem hoc mortus si quis ex reliquis excellit dignitate succedit at si sunt plures suffragio Druidum adlegitur Nonnunquam etiam de principatu armis contendunt Caes lib. 6. de Bell. Gal. §. 37. §. 38. §. 39. §. 40. §. 41. §. 42. §. 43. §. 44. §. 45. §. 46. §. 47. §. 48. §. 49. §. 50. §. 51. §. 52. §. 53. §. 54. §. 55. §. 56. §. 57. §. 1. §. 2. §. 3. §. 4. §. 5. §. 6. §. 7. §. 8. §. 9. §. 10. §. 11. §. 12. §. 13. §. 14. §. 15. §. 16. §. 17. §. 18. §. 19. §. 20. §. 21. §. 22. §. 23. §. 24. §. 25. §. 26. §. 27. §. 1. §. 2. §. 3. §. 4. §. 5. §. 6. §. 7. §. 8. §. 9. §. 10. §. 11. §. 12. §. 13. §. 13. §. 14. §. 16. §. 17. §. 18. §. 19. §. 20 §. 21 §. 22. §. 23. §. 24. §. 25. §. 26. §. 27. §. 28. §. 29. §. 30. §. 31. §. 32. §. 33. §. 34. §. 35. §. 36. §. 37. §. 38. §. 39. §. 40. §. 41. §. 42. §. 43. §. 44. §. 45. §. 46. §. 47. §. 48. §. 49. §. 50. §. 51. §. 52. §. 53. §. 54. §. 55. §. 56. §. 57. §. 58. §. 59. §. 60. §. 62. §. 63. §. 64. §. 65 §. 66. §. 67. §. 68.